The URL can be used to link to this page

2011/06/28 City Council Resolution 2011-55RESOLUTION NO. 2011-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ADOPTING THE FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2011 -12 THROUGH 2015 -16 AND APPROVING PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2011 -12 WHEREAS, the City's Capital Improvement Program Committee, made up of various City departments, has assembled a slate of proposed capital improvement projects and associated costs covering the period between Fiscal Year 2011 -12 and Fiscal Year 2015 -16; WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park's General Plan 2000 requires that a Capital Improvement Program be in place as a planning and budgeting tool for the improvement of City facilities and infrastructure, to be reviewed and updated annually; WHEREAS, this project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to the California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15306 (Class 6 — Information Collection); WHEREAS; City staff and the Rohnert Park Planning Commission have reviewed the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2011 -12 through 2015 -16 and recommend its adoption; WHEREAS, on June 14, 2011, the City Council reviewed and discussed the draft Five - Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2011 -12 through 2015 -16 and recommended revisions; and WHEREAS, on June 28, 2011, the City Council reviewed the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2011 -12 through 2015 -16 with recommended revisions. NOW THEREFORE BE. IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park does hereby authorize and adopt the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2011 -12 through 2015 -16 and approve projects for FY 2011 -12. DULY AND REGULARY ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert. Park this 28th day of June, 2011. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ATTEST: ig ERT Clerk 1� �acrPOR AHANOTU: AYt' CALLINAN: AYE MACKENZIE AYE STAFFORD: AYE BELFORTE: AYE AYES: (5) NOES: (0) ABSENT: (0) ABSTAIN: (0) 1 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET 2011 -12 ■ 2012 -13 ■ 2013 -14 ■ 2014 -15 ■ 2015 -16 City Council Gina Belforte, Mayor Jake Mackenzie, Vice -Mayor Amy O. Ahanotu, Council Member Joseph T. Callinan, Council Member Pam Stafford, Council Member City Manager Gabriel A. Gonzalez CI TY OF ROHNERT PARK FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET 2011 -12 ■ 2012 -13 ■ 2013 -14 ■ 2014 -15 ■ 2015 -16 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Section 1 Funded Projects • Project Summary Project Descriptions Section 2 Funded Projects Beyond 5 -Year CIP and Partially- Funded Projects Section 3 Unfunded Projects Appendix • Planning Commission. Resolution 2011 -13 • City Council Resolution 2011 -56 CI TY OF ROHNERT PARK FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET 2011 -12 ■ 2012 -13 ■ 2013 -14 ■ 2014 -15 ■ 2015 -16 Introduction The Five -Year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) document serves as a multi -year planning tool to coordinate the financing and scheduling of major projects undertaken by the City. The capital improvements presented in this document include new and expansion construction projects, as well as rehabilitation or replacement of existing City owned assets. In general a capital project will meet the following criteria: • The project is $50,000 or greater in cost. • The project has a life span of at least 10 years. • The project is unique in nature and is not a recurring budget expenditure. • The project is a fixed asset (may include activities /components that result in a fixed asset, such as training, preliminary studies, software, acquisition, etc.). This five -year plan attempts to set funding strategies not only for the current fiscal year of 2011 -2012, but also projects future needs for major construction and public facilities that .benefit the citizens of Rohnert Park. This fiscal year's Capital Improvement Program will address the following issues through rehabilitation, preventative maintenance, and expansion of facilities: • Elimination of potentially hazardous or unsafe conditions and potential liabilities • Replacement of high maintenance and inefficient/ineffective infrastructure or systems • Stimulation of the local economy • Elimination of blighted conditions • Compliance with the Rohnert Park General Plan • Preservation of existing assets How the CIP is used While the CIP is dynamic and consequently must be revised periodically to address changing needs, priorities, and financial conditions, an adopted Five -Year CIP provides a guideline to city staff for project prioritization, scheduling and work planning. The schedule for Capital Improvement Projects is based on available funding, public benefit, and funding restrictions. The CIP also assists staff in showing funding and scheduling relationships among all the of the City's projects, anticipated development, regional developments, and funding sources. The CIP also: • Serves as a communications tool to the public, other governmental .units, and the business community detailing the location and timing of improvements. • Improves intergovernmental and regional cooperation Fulfills requirements of planning, regulatory and financial requirements as documentation of the City's intent to expend funds to preserve assets and continue to provide services Organization of CIP document This CIP document is organized into three parts: • Section 1 — Funded Projects. These are projects that have identified and committed funding (i.e. the revenues are restricted to certain uses or are project - specific and cannot be used for other projects) and are scheduled within the five -year CIP period as well as can be determined at this point in time. Projects shown with costs in Fiscal Year 2011 -12 represent projects that are in- progress, planned, or will be initiated with the Council approval of this CIP. These projects have also been scheduled with consideration to available project delivery capacity (in -house and through outside professionals). Also, depending on prevailing economic conditions and funding opportunities that may arise, projects may be moved forward or back within the 5 -year CIP period. Staff will seek Council's guidance and approval for such changes to the CIP. • Section 2 — Projects Beyond 5 -Year CIP and Partially- Funded Projects. These are projects.that have identified funding, but are scheduled at this time outside of the five -year CIP period. These projects are listed within this document so that, should economic conditions change, new funding opportunities arise, or other /new projects emerge that can coordinate with the City's CIP projects, the project descriptions and costs are available in a single document for reference and project planning. . Although the bulk of the projects in this section are those listed in the Public Facilities Financing Plan and are expected to the funded by the Public Facilities Fee, there are a few projects that have been identified in the FY 2010 -14 Five -Year CDC Implementation Plan and are proposed for partial funding from Redevelopment funds. Most of these projects can be phased, and thus can be delivered with the partial funding if so desired. Section 3 Unfunded Projects. The list of Unfunded Projects includes projects that have been identified in other planning documents such as the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Corridor Master Plan, previous CIPs, or by City staff. They are recorded in this CIP document so that should funding opportunities arise, the project descriptions and costs are available in a single document for reference and project planning. For all of the projects included in the CIP — with the exception of projects in progress for which actual costs, or projected costs and available funding are known and fixed — the actual amount of fiinds available for projects are based on conservative revenue estimates, and are strictly estimates, as the revenue sources and timing of available funds will vary. SECTION 7 FUNDED PROJECTS FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. PROGRAM BUDGET (FY 2011 -12 through 2015 -16) FUNDED PROJECTS DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION COSTS 5 -year Total TOTAL Project Costs - FY 2011 -12 PROJECT ProjeCt . through 2010 - through FY COST (Des. & CIP # Pro /ect # Project Title funding Source manager 11(estlactuaq 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 2015 -16 2015 -16) Const.) v n- Y OF -33 Southside Fire Station Public Facilities fee TBD 0 0;# 0 0 3,640,262 0 $3,640,262 $3,640,262 Copeland Creek Detention Basin & Developer; Copeland Creek Drainage Fund. Applications for Prop. 84 grant OF -39 2006 -04 Steelhead Refugia Prop. 1 B grant submitted by SCWA. P. Barnes 9,440 0 0 738,604 4,311,298 0 $5,049,902 $5,059,342 Energy Management System for Public OF-48 2010 -12 Safety Building EECBG Grant BAAQMD) J. Chung 5,000 72,690 0 0 0 0 $72,690 $77,690 Demolition of Building & Site .tw OF-49 2010 -13 Improvements, 435 Southwest Blvd. Redevelopment Fund 2007 H Bond R. Pedroncelli 101,000 49,000 0 0 0 0 $49,000 $150,000 OF Northeast Drainage Basin Public Faciltiies Fee TBD 0 O u, 0 0 0 4,010,166 $4,010,16 $4,010,166 Total Ci Facilities Pro ects $115,440 $121,690 $0 $738,604 $7,951,560 $4,010,166 $12,822,02 $72,937,460 PARKS AND) RECREATION PR-49 2007 -19 Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park Open Space District matching grant P. Bames 900 0 tiabi 710,000 0 0 0 $710,00 $710,900 Total Parks and Recreation Pro ects $900 $0 $710,000 $0 $0 $0 $710,000 $710,900 TRANSPORTATION'PRQJECTS� ': Golf Course Drive West Widening (between 1999 City Limits &Dowdell Public Facilities Fee (Developer project TR -24 2010-05 Ave /City staff support) TBD 4,197 30,000 0 0 0 0 $30,000 $34,197 Snyder Lane Widening -Phase 1 3 TR -26 2007 -03 (Southwest Blvd. to Medical Cntr Dr. ) Public Facilities Fee, Gas Tax TBD 52,177 0 u 3,084,399 0 0 0 $3,084,399 $3,136,576 kgg TR -27 Snyder Lane Widening - Phase 2 Public Facilities Fee, Gas Tax TBD 01 0 0 0 6,649,754 0 $6,649,754 $6,649,754 TR -28 Snyder Lane Widening - Phase 3 Public Facilities Fee, Gas Tax TBD 0 0 0 0 0 1,604,026 $1,604,026 $1,604,026 Rohnert Park Expressway Widening - TR -29 2005 -10 East Public Facilities Fee TBD 35,045 ,1� 0 t1 760,123 0 7,722,380 0 $8,482,503 $8,517,548 Dowdell Avenue (375' N to 750' S of Public Facilities Fee (Developer project 1 TR -30 Wilfred Ave) / City staff support) TBD 01 10,000_ 0 0 0 0 $10,000 $10,000 Dowdell Avenue (Business Park Dr to TR -32 Martin Ave) Public Facilities Fee TBD 0 0 0 1,958,512 0 0 $1,958,512 $1,958,512 " NOTE: For detailed breakdown of project preconstruction / construction costs for each project, refer to the individual Project Descriptions. Printed 6/20/2011 FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET (FY 2011 -12 through 2015 -16) FUNDED PROJECTS WATER "SYSTEM WA -04 2004 -08 Water Main improvement Project Public Facilities Fee P. Barnes 161,672 r 0 ` DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION 2,206,756 COSTS 0 $2,290,279 $2,451,951 WA -20 2005 -03 Recycled Water System Expansion SCWA LRT2 TBD 11,415 0 50,000 1 0 0 $650,000 $661,415 5 -year Total TOTAL Project Costs WA -23 (FY 2011-12 PROJECT . P. Barnes 1,200 1,200,000; � Project through 2010 - 0 0 $1,200,000 $1,201,200 through FY COST (Des. & CIP# Project# Project Title Funding Source manager 11(estlactual) 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 2015 -16 2015 -16) Const.) 0 m :E 340,000 0 0 0 $340,000 $340,000 Water service charges (water utility ,0 TR -75 2010 -09 2011 Various Streets Overlays Prop. 1 B P. Bames 80,000 691,1801 WA -28 0 0 0 0 $691,180 $771,180 0 Aden Drive and East Cotati Avenue Measure M, Federal (STPICMAQ), $600,000 $600,000 TR -78 2010 -07 Overlays Prop. 42, Gas Tax P. Bames 70,250 150,000, Water service charges (water utility' 894,500 0 0 0 $1,044,500 $1,114,750 Bruce Avenue & Bridgit Drive Water fund), water meter replacement reserve, Copeland Creek Bike Path Gas Tax, Measure M, Federal System Replacement 2005 CSCDA water revenue bond P. Bames 0 1,600,000 400,000 0 0 0 $2,000;000 TR -79 2010 -08 Reconstruction (Transportation Enhancement program) T. Bertolero 80,000 120,000 600,000 0 0 0 $720,000 $800,000 WA -31 Well Rehabilitafion Program Traffic Safety Fund, Traffic Signalization TBD 0 0 1,11111 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 $400,0001 $400,000 TR-80 2011 -02 Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project Fund, Gas Tax P. Bames 30,000 510,0 ON, 0 0 0 0 $510,000 $540,000 Water service charges 2013 Various Streets Preventive 0 0' 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 $720,000 $720,000 TR -81 Maintenance Measure M, Gas Tax P. Bames 0 0 (:`{ 550,000 0 0 0 $550,000 $550,000 Gas Tax, Measure M, Gas Excise Tax TR -82 2014 Street Maintenance Project ( "Prop. 42 swap ") P. Barnes 0 0 70,000 940,000 0 0 $1,010,00 $1,010,000 Total Trans ortatlon Pro'ects $351,669 $1,511,1800 $5,959,022 $2,898,512 $14,372,134. $1,604,026 $26,344,87 $26,696,544 WATER "SYSTEM WA -04 2004 -08 Water Main improvement Project Public Facilities Fee P. Barnes 161,672 r 0 ` 83,523 2,206,756 0 0 $2,290,279 $2,451,951 WA -20 2005 -03 Recycled Water System Expansion SCWA LRT2 TBD 11,415 0 50,000 600,000 0 0 $650,000 $661,415 Water Storage Tanks Exterior Painfing WA -23 2008 -03 Project 2005 CSCDA Water Revenue Bond P. Barnes 1,200 1,200,000; � 0 0 0 0 $1,200,000 $1,201,200 WA -27 Commerce Water Line Re lacement Water service char es P. Games 0 0 m :E 340,000 0 0 0 $340,000 $340,000 Water service charges (water utility ,0 WA -28 2011 -03 2011 Water Meter Installation Project fund), water capital projects reserve J. Chung 0 300,000, j 300,000 0 0 0 $600,000 $600,000 Water service charges (water utility' `?Yk Bruce Avenue & Bridgit Drive Water fund), water meter replacement reserve, WA -30 System Replacement 2005 CSCDA water revenue bond P. Bames 0 1,600,000 400,000 0 0 0 $2,000;000 $2,000,000 WA -31 Well Rehabilitafion Program Water service charges TBD 0 0 1,11111 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 $400,0001 $400,000 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant and Hydrant Kai WA -32 Valve Replacement Water service charges TBD 0 0' 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 $720,000 $720,000 NOTE: For detailed breakdown of project preconstruction / construction costs for each project, refer to the individual Project Descriptions. Printed 6/2012011 FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET (FY 2011 -12 through 2015 -16) FUNDED PROJECTS .. NOTE: For detailed breakdown of project preconstruction / construction costs for each project, refer to the individual Project Descriptions. PHmed 6 /20/2011 Sewer service charges, Public Facilities` 5 -year Total TOTAL 2011 -04 Interceptor Outfall Rehabilitation Fee P. Barnes 0 Project Costs 0 0 0 6,503,075 $6,653,075 $6,653,075 (FY 2011 -12 PROJECT Project through 2010- through FY COST (Des. & CIP# Project# Project Title Funding Source manager 11(est/actual) 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 2015 -16 2015 -16) Const.) 0 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 $3,600,000 $3,600,000 Eastside Trunk Sewer- Phase 2 (Main Public Facilities Fee / Developer WA -33 Well and Tank Site Electrical Upgrades Water service charges TBD 0 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 $800,000 $800,000 10,351,723 Water Service Laterals along East Side 0 0 $10,751,723 $10,789,893 Eastside Trunk Sewer - Phase 2 (South Public Facilities Fee / Developer 1,111111,11 WA -34 Trunk Sewer route Water service charges TBD 0 0 ', , 400,000 0 0 0 $400,000 $400,000 0 Water Distribution System $1,889,066 $1,889,066 WA -35 Improvements: Circle Drive Water service charges. TBD 0 0 0 3,025,000 2,475,000 0 0 $5,500,000 $5,500,000 $300,000 Water Tanks 1 & 2 Ladders and Interior Bruce Avenue & Bridgit Drive Sewer Sewer service charges (sewer utility WA -36 Cleaning Water service charges J. Chung 01 1001000 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 $100,000 $100,000 Total Water Proiects t17A9A71 ea 9nn nnn cG n7R r9l to 79Z9 7aa @Ann nnn tACn nnnl t4c nnn 09 tAG 41A — .. NOTE: For detailed breakdown of project preconstruction / construction costs for each project, refer to the individual Project Descriptions. PHmed 6 /20/2011 Sewer service charges, Public Facilities` WW -08 2011 -04 Interceptor Outfall Rehabilitation Fee P. Barnes 0 150,000 0 0 0 6,503,075 $6,653,075 $6,653,075 WW -10 Sewer Pipeline Re lacement Sewer service charges P. Barnes 0 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 $3,600,000 $3,600,000 Eastside Trunk Sewer- Phase 2 (Main Public Facilities Fee / Developer WWA1 2007 -02 Reach) advance, Canon Manor Fee P. Barnes 38,1701 400,000 10,351,723 0 0 0 $10,751,723 $10,789,893 Eastside Trunk Sewer - Phase 2 (South Public Facilities Fee / Developer 1,111111,11 WW -12 Reach ) advance, Canon Manor Fees P. Barnes 0 188,907 1,700,159 0 0 0 $1,889,066 $1,889,066 WW -15 Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Program Sewer service charges TBD 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 $300,000 $300,000 Bruce Avenue & Bridgit Drive Sewer Sewer service charges (sewer utility WW -20 Replacement fund), 2005 sewer revenue bond P. Barnes 0 11900,000 1 1,300,000 0 0 0 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 Replacement of Sewer Pipe Under Hwy WW -21 101 @ RPX overcrossing Sewer service charges. P. Barnes 0 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 $1,500,00 $1,500,000 Total Wastewater System Projects $38,170 $2,638,907 - $13,351,882 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $9,303,075 $27,893,864 $27,932,034 eke TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $680,466 $7,4711,777111111111 $25,099,427 $10,698,87 $24,103,69 $15,397,267 $82,771,038 $83,451,50 .. NOTE: For detailed breakdown of project preconstruction / construction costs for each project, refer to the individual Project Descriptions. PHmed 6 /20/2011 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. ;Southside Fire Station I :.Other Facilities F $0 F _............... .................... _._........---.............. _... . Project Location . ............. ._...._._............... .................._....._..._...._.......OF ._..-..3._..3 . ... ...........................i Description ;TBD $728,052 :Three -bay fire station located east of Highway 101 within the Sonoma Mountain :Village Planned Development. The facility will include storage and office areas. "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing - - - -- $0 Department Project Manager department's $0 (Public Safety —J TBD work plan? ❑ $0 Project Status: - - ----- - - -- -- - -- - - -- - - -------- - _....__.......__... — `Not in current work plan ____ ...... Justification $0 ! I proposed facility replaces the Station 4 (Maurice Avenue Station) Expansion I !public Facilities Fee :ct proposed in the original Public Facilities Financing Plan. The increased uses associated with the Sonoma Mountain Village Planned Development an expansion of Station 4 -- located in a modified residential dwelling -- a practical and viable public safety facility for the anticipated needs in the area. TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $3,640,262 i F $0 DESIGNICONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through o-yr. CIP FY 201.1 -1.2 FY 2012 -1.3 FY 201.3 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2Q16 period ❑ Design /Engineering FUNDING SOURCES $0 Funding Funding beyond $0 F S67 F $0 F $0 $0 I $364,026 $0 Land Costs $728,052 F $0 PEEP $0 - - - -- $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings ............ _ ____ ...... $0 ! I $0 $o $0 $0 1 $0 $0 Improvements $0 - -- $o $0 . $0..'... $0 ....-$2,002,145 Inspection f CM ....._ . °..._ _ $0..... __._$0 $0.._..:'..._ - -$� .. __._.. $0 ' L $0 ... F $0 I.......... ............ $0 $0 $0 $546,039 $0 Contingency t . $0 i......... $0 ._.......... $o ... _....... - -- -- — $0 $0 $728 052 $0 Other Expenses $0 ; $0 - ..__...__._..., $0 $0 j ! $0 $0 . ...... ...... .. .. Total Design/ $0 $0 Construction $364,026, FUNDING SOURCES $0 Funding Funding beyond $0 $0 $2,002,145 F $0 $546,039 ............ . $0 $728,052 F $0 PEEP $0 - - - -- $0 $0 $0 ...1.. $3,640,262 s0 I $3,640,2620...... Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 l $3,640,262 $0 $3,640,262 $0 GAP FUNDING _.._...._ ... _$0 .. -- - - $� _. $0— - -- $� -. $0 $0 NEEDED _ Date D FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period PEEP $0 - - - -- $0 $0 - $0 $3 640 262 $0 $3 640 262 $0 I .. ............ _ ____ ...... $o $o $o $o !j $0 -$o $0 1 - -- $o ....._ . °..._ _ $0..... __._$0 $0.._..:'..._ - -$� .. __._.. $0 ' L $0 ... _.._. °_... $0 ( L. ...__$. - $o �... $o $o I- ..._. ......._._. . .......... .:... -- ..___ $o ... _....... - -- -- — $o I $o L - ._._... ..:._._.._....._._........._... -) -- $0 --- ..__........._.... $o $o _ $o $o ''..... $ —= - ..__...__._..., $o _ Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 l $3,640,262 $0 $3,640,262 $0 GAP FUNDING _.._...._ ... _$0 .. -- - - $� _. $0— - -- $� -. $0 $0 NEEDED _ Date D Date S Project Description 5-Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11-12 to FY 85-16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. .Copeland Creek Detention Basin & Steelhead Refugia !Other Facilities 2006-04 OF-39 Project Location Description !Along Copeland Creek, east of Petaluma Hill Road ,Construction of an approximately 65-75 acre-foot regional detention facility to "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing the 1 00-year flow in Copeland Creek Department Project Manager department's Development Services `m�� P. Barnes n, _ �P - —___'_____—_____-__.___________� Justification _--_- F"^dbmu8vu,oes; .................. ... --��_��-�-_'--____-� ject was identified m the Storm Drain Master Plan mminimize flooding in m Creek downstream from Petaluma Hill Road. The ponds will also temporary refuge for migrating umo|hean during o large storm events, `t detention, os well ao potential groundwater aquifer recharge. 0eveloper; Copeland Creek Drainage Fund. Applications for Prop. | 184 grant Prop. 1 B grant submitted by SCWA. TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded so DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through yr. CIP malarAllualuillillIFY201.1-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 FY2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016. period El Land Costs so F so] so Inspection CM $0 $1, FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5-year CIP FY 2011-12 FY 201.2-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016 period .Copeland ek _^�--------_^�^_______-^_----___�`_______'�_--_----� Prop. 84 grant total Sources GAP FUNDING | meEoso ............. ^='~=—~~= ....... ..... --�—^L ---- --- --- ..... --_-------�------��--------|�_______��_______� Date Date Copeland Creek Detention Basin & originally l Unfunded/ PFFP City funding share source is identified Steelhead Refugia ast LJnderfunded I project City funding share is committed E] Friday, June 17, 20114:26:52 PM 5/ /20 Mechanism .Copeland ek _^�--------_^�^_______-^_----___�`_______'�_--_----� Prop. 84 grant total Sources GAP FUNDING | meEoso ............. ^='~=—~~= ....... ..... --�—^L ---- --- --- ..... --_-------�------��--------|�_______��_______� Date Date Copeland Creek Detention Basin & originally l Unfunded/ PFFP City funding share source is identified Steelhead Refugia ast LJnderfunded I project City funding share is committed E] Friday, June 17, 20114:26:52 PM 5/ /20 Mechanism total Sources GAP FUNDING | meEoso ............. ^='~=—~~= ....... ..... --�—^L ---- --- --- ..... --_-------�------��--------|�_______��_______� Date Date Copeland Creek Detention Basin & originally l Unfunded/ PFFP City funding share source is identified Steelhead Refugia ast LJnderfunded I project City funding share is committed E] Friday, June 17, 20114:26:52 PM 5/ /20 Mechanism Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. :Energy Management System for Public Safety Building Other Facilities Costs after 2010 -12 OF-48 Project Location through Description ..... ................._ ........ ............. --._...._.__ .._...._.........._....__...... ..................... .. (Public Safety Main Building FY 201.1 -12 FY 2012 -13 :Upgrading the Energy Management System for the heating and air condition FY 2015 -16 ........................ _.._...._......_......__.................................._........................._.__................_._...--.........._._..._._..................... "project Owner" Implementing ............................_.1 In implementing controls at the main Public Safety Building. $0 Department Project Manager department's $0 —so-1 __...__._.......__..........._:.. ..._..........._..:....._.._... Public Wks / Comm Svcs ........ __._...._....._._.._........... J. Chung work plan? Project Status: - — -- — -- -- - - - - -- -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- --------- - - - - -= Implementation in progress. $0 Justification FnndinaCnnrrnc• $0 $0 The current system uses more energy than necessary and requires more mainetenance calls because of inconsistent heating, cooling and corrections necessary to maintain a tolerable temperature. This project will greatly improve the system's energy efficiency, reduce the City's costs, and contribute to a healthier and more comfortable work environment for the building's occupants. Grant (BAAQMD) TOTAL PROJECT COST (.Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $77,690 $0 — Total Sources $5,000 ... ....._$72. 690 ...... ' i_....__......._.........._.._$ 0 ............... ..._:..........._......_$0_...' I.................... --- - ._......_$ 0..._.._.... ..._........................_$0 i _$77,690.......J ... ..............._............... $0...... GAP FUNDING _ .._$0 - - -- $0._.. _.... __._._. —$� - - - - -._ $0 - -- ..._$0_... . . .. $0_._ $0� -- $0 NEEDED Date D Date E DESIGNMONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP FY 201.1 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 201344 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 �� $0 —so-1 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 T $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $5 000 $72 690 . _........... $0 $0 $0 ._ .... $0 $77,690 $0 Inspection / Civi I ....... $0 $0 $ $0 ......._ $0 I . ................ 0 $0 ..._ ....... $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 i . .._ . $0.. (.:... _.... $0... $0....... $0 Other Expenses F777 777j5T] $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $5,000 $72,690 $0 $0 ir $0 l $0 1 $77,690 ( $0 Construction I .. FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period Total Sources $5,000 ... ....._$72. 690 ...... ' i_....__......._.........._.._$ 0 ............... ..._:..........._......_$0_...' I.................... --- - ._......_$ 0..._.._.... ..._........................_$0 i _$77,690.......J ... ..............._............... $0...... GAP FUNDING _ .._$0 - - -- $0._.. _.... __._._. —$� - - - - -._ $0 - -- ..._$0_... . . .. $0_._ $0� -- $0 NEEDED Date D Date E Project ®escript1A1'i 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY I1 -1.2 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Demolition of Building & Site Improvements, 435 Southwest Blvd. I 10ther Facilities 112010-13 OF-49 _.. .... _ .. _.. . Project Location Description 435 Southwest Blvd. ................._......... ... ......... _ ..- ...._._...._........_:..... .. ...... Abatement of hazardous materials, removal of building and site improvements, abandonment of utilities and rough grading and drainage. Other expenses include "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing pest control; storage and /or relocation of existing equipment, communication Department Project Manager department's facilities. Redevelopment R. Pedroncelli work plan? Project Status: -- - — - - - -- — - -- -------- - - - - -- ----- --------------- -- -- — — lDemolition complete. Grading, site work and drainage in progress. Justification .__.... .. _ ___. Fundin:iSources: s project removes an old, blighted building that was harboring pests and was the most part, unusable. This project prepares the old Fire Station site for sale i eventual use as the site of an affordable housing / mixed -use project. ;Redevelopment Fund (2007 H Bond) I TOTAL P120JECT COST (Design and Construction) r Amount unfunded $150,000 I.. $0 ........................ DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after . through 5 yr. CIP t t - FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 201.3 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ $ 15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106 000 F $0 ......... $0 $0.... F____s_o $29,000 $0 Total Design/ $101,000 $49,000 $0 $0 ' $0 $0 ( ( $150,000 , $0 Construction 1 I u . FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -I5 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period $150,000....... $0 _.__.._....... $0 _.. ..__.....----- ..- $0 ._.... ..._.._ ................ _.$0__._ ............ ......................_$0...... $0 Design/Engineering g b b�l $15,000 $ $0 $0 1 $0 � $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings. IF $ ' $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 Improvements $86,000 11 $20,000 —� $0 1 $0 , $0 $0 Inspection / CM $0 $0 r�- .T .� . _.... $0 $0 i $0 $0 ... .............._... .... . Contingency $0 I $� .... $0 $0 .: .._ $0 $0.... Other Expenses F $0 j $29,000 $0 $0 $0 IF-so $ 15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106 000 F $0 ......... $0 $0.... F____s_o $29,000 $0 Total Design/ $101,000 $49,000 $0 $0 ' $0 $0 ( ( $150,000 , $0 Construction 1 I u . FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -I5 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period $150,000....... $0 _.__.._....... $0 _.. ..__.....----- ..- $0 ._.... ..._.._ ................ _.$0__._ ............ ......................_$0...... $0 . s . 0 $0 1 Total Sources $101,000 - $49,000 1 , ... $�.._....._._. _ . .. $0 ._l ..._.. ... ... $� I ..... $0 i I $150,000 GAP FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 NEEDED .._.._.. _..._.._..._........._ - -- — Date D Date C Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Northeast Drainage Basin !Other Facilities $0 �OF -50 $0 Project Location ............................ Description TBD _ :Upstream detention basin on the Hinebaugh Creek system. _.__......_ "Project Owner" ................._._.....__.._.......__.........___._...:_.......__ ..... ....... ......... ..._...........: Implementing In implementing ! $0 Department Project Manager department's $0 Buildings Development Services p ! ;TBD work plan? ❑ -so $0_ Project Status: $0 - - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- Not in current work plan $0 _.. Justification FundinuSoure": _. . -mwater flow from new development will result in the need for more capacity in drainage system. An upstream detention basins on the Hinebaugh Creek :em is recommended to reduce peak flow throughout the City's drainage em and provide capacity for new development. !Public Faciltiies Fee TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $4,010,166 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP FY 201.1 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $401,017 Land Costs $0 $0 .. ........ $4,010,166 $0 .................. ............:.................. Funding Funding beyond through 5-year CIP FY 2016 period $0 O ! $0 $0 $0 $0 i . $0 Buildings $0 IF -so $0_ $0 $0 $0 Improvements $ .: $0 _.. $0 $0 _$0 $2,205,591.... . Ins ection / CM pl..... (� $0 ! ............. _ $0 $0 ..... .... . .. 0 $0 ..... _ $601,525 Contingency $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $802,033 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Desi n/ g $0 1 $0 $0 $0 ,. .. .....$0 I ( $4,010,166 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 - $401,017 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,205,591 F $0 ..... . ..... .... .................. . ......... ............................... $601,525 $0 $802,033 ..... ........ _... F $0 $0 $0 .. ........ $4,010,166 $0 .................. ............:.................. Funding Funding beyond through 5-year CIP FY 2016 period $4,010,166 $0� - -$0 ----- ......__._$O ...... _._ ......... _ ... _ .... -$0 �....__$ _... ..._..._......._.._.._ Total Sources $0 $0 '$0 $0 j��$0 $0 $4,010,166 $4,010,166 so l._......_ _........ t. ..._._ .. GAP FUNDING $0.- - - -- $�- --- - - - -$� - - -- $� -.— $0 -.$0- $0 $0 ... NEEDED Date D Date C Project Description 5-Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11-12 to FY 15-16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park (I. P a r k s and R e c r e a t i o n 2007 -19 P R 4 9 Project Location Description !East of Petaluma Hill Road ............... ........... ......... . . . . . ... . ............... . . ........ . . ............... - ................... ........ ... . . ............ ,, ........... .Construction of a multi-use trail connecting the service road to Tank No. 8 (potable .water tank serving University District) east of Petaluma Hill Road to Crane Creek Project Owner" Implementing In implementing .Regional Park. This trail is part of a multi-phased project connecting the Copeland Department Project Manager depa .Creek Bike Path at its terminus in Sonoma State University to the regional park. rDevelopment Services I.P. Barnes work rtment's plan? Project Status: -------------------------- -- — - -------------------- - ----------- - ---- - -------- - --- — — - — ------------------- - - ---- -------- Considering land acquisition/dedication alternatives Justification . . ............. . -... F d i n;y,';o u rees: trail is shown in regional master plans for parks and open space. The City ,ed with Brookfield Homes to secure a dedication of trail easement on its erty for the construction of a trail connecting the urbanized area of Rohnert : and its citizens to nearby open space resources. Space District matching grant TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $710,900 $900 ............ .......... - .............. - DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 201.3-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016 period I . ❑ Design/Engineering $0 ............... ............... F—$ .................... . .... Contingency $0 ........ ................... ............ F— .. $o $0 I ....... . . ............ . . .... ............................. ... . ... F77WI Other Expenses F-so $0 $0 Land Costs �6 - L ............... . i F--$o F—$o $0 $0 Buildings F$0_ 1 F_$o _� F $o $01 � 17---so'l, Improvements $o_A0 . ......... - F _$710,000 .. . .................................. ........... $0 ........... ............................ so Inspection / CM $0 ............... ............... F—$ .................... . .... Contingency $0 ........ ................... ............ F— .. $o $0 I ....... . . ............ . . .... ............................. ... . ... Other Expenses F-7—so-TI—so F—$o $0 $900_ L.......... ..... ....... J Date T $6_1 L ----------------- J $710,000 ............ ----------------- -------------------- �6 - L ............... . i F--$-o-1, 1711.411 ................ . .. .. ........... ............... .............. 1111111111111-11111111111111 , I . ......... J Total Design/ $o 'm6,666, 1 $0 vio,666 . ....... . ... $0 Construction .................................. FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5-year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources $o ..... . _.... . _._...... ._...$ .. . o ..........$710,000 _s oFso_ F ..... ... . ...$.....7.... 1...0... . ,..0....0.. . 0 .... . - - - $0 ............ ... ... ..... . ................................... . . ................... . GAP FUNDING I so $0 7--$o-F----$oF$900 [:=$o NEEDED — Date D Date T Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -1.2 to .FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Golf Course Drive West Widening (between 1,999 City Limits & Dowdell A Transportation 2010 -05 TR -24 .......... ............................................. ............................... . Project Location Description iGolf Course Drive West (formerlly Wilfred Avenue) .... ..... ........ of Golf Course Drive West (formerly Wilfred Avenue) from 2 -lanes to 4- - " lanes between the 1999 City Limits and Dowdell Avenue. The project includes "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing .Class II bike lanes on both sides, sidewalks and landscaping, and traffic signals at Department Project Manager department's Redwood Drive, Labath Avenue, and Dowdell Avenue. IDevelopment Services I 1TBD work plan: ❑ Project Status: - - - - -- - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - — -- -- - - - - - Not in current work plan. (Primarily a developer -built project.) Justification ......:......_._......__.. _._...._..._.._....____._....._ _._..__...____...__. FundingSources: widening project is necessary to both reconstruct this roadway which was ntly- annexed from the County, and also increase capacity to serve planned ,lopment as part of the implementation of the Rohnert Park General Plan the -ed- Dowdell Specific Plan and Northwest Specific Plan. ;Public Facilities Fee (Developer project / City staff support) TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $34,197 $0 Project costs Costs after through DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS FY 2016 period ❑ ..........$34,197 i r FY 201.1 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Design /.Engineering $4,197 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 __ $0 0 $0 F77 $0 1,-s o $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 i $0 i $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 ....... ................ $0 0 $0 .. ......... $0 Inspection / CIVI F; s6_1 I $0 ......... ....... $0 ........ _.... .... $0 $0 ........... ... . i . $0 Contingency $� ,' $0 ........ . $0 ..' ... ..... ... $� $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 : $0 $0 Project costs Costs after through 5 -yr. CIP FY 2016 period ❑ ..........$34,197 $0 ..............................; _ ....................................... $0 $0 ..........; $0 $0 $0 _ .............$0...... $30,000 ............ ............................................ $0 $0 $0 $0 ......... .. ...... Total Design/ $4,197 i g $30,000 $0 $0. .. $0 $0 $34,197 $0....� Construction - FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 PEEP $4,197 $30,000 ............ ............................................ $0 $0 r - -- $0 i.......................... $0 $0 $0 $0 ..............................; _ ....................................... $0 $0 ..........; $0 $0 .. $0 . - -- ...... $0 __ $0 0 $0 r $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 ! :............................-........... ........... . $0 $* o I $0 $0 i $0 i $0 Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $0 ................ $0.... Total Sources $4,197 $30,000 $0 $0 j $0 $0 $34,197 $0 l.._... .._._.___ ..................._._ _._. ....... .... _....._.._....... _ ...... _.... _.: GAP FUNDING -...._ .. -i _ ..._. s6._... L_ - - -- . ............. $0 $0 _ $0- -- $0 $-- $0 NEEDED .......- ------- - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- Date b bate C Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Snyder Lane Widening -Phase 1 (Southwest Blvd. to Medical Cntr Dr.) Transportation 2007 -03 TR -26 Land Costs _._. _......._ ..................._...._... ......._:......_.._............ __._...__ .............. .... ..........._.. ........... Project Location Description Snyder Lane (Southwest Blvd. to Medical Cntr Dr.) ...................._........_.............._...._.._......_._.........._................._........_..................._........................................................_......._..._._......................................... ........._..............._.._.. .This project is for the widening of Snyder Lane between Medical Center Drive and $0 :Southwest Blvd. and includes four.travel lanes, a Class 11 bike lane on both sides, "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing bridge at Copeland Creek, sidewalks and landscaping, and traffic control device / Department Project Manager department's Devlopment services work plan: m rovement at Rohnert Park Expressway. — ❑ Project Status: - -- -- - - - ----- ----- IDesigned with Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase 2 On hold. _.._.... ___ ............. .._.. . ... ........... .._. _..... . Justification FundingSources: ding to the General Plan, project specific EIRs and the City's recent review of capacity needs, this widening project is necessary to increase capacity to planned new development. Facilities Fee, Gas Tax TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $3,1.36,576 � � $0 DESIGNMONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs - through FY 201.1 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 201344 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 Design /Engineering F77162,177 ; $0 $164,139 $0 $0-1 $0 Land Costs FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 ,PFF(roadway) $0 $0 (: L. $0 i $0 $0 $0 PFF (med /front) Buildings F7 7777_i57Mso $563,167 - $0 $0 '—so $0 Improvements $0 $0 $2,163156 L............. $0 $0 I....... $0 ...............1 Inspection / CM $0 i $0 $0 .... F $0 ] $0 . . ... ......... ... $324,473 ..................._.........._ _.... $0 . I $0 $247,235 - -- Contingency $0 $0 $432,631 $0 $0 ... . .. . . $298,100 $0 i $0 L.............. _........ ................. . ................................ Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 ,$0 1 0 $216,316 $0 E$0 $2,163,156 Costs after 5-yr. CIP period ❑ $0 $0 $0 .$324,473 .... ...... ... ....... .......... so . . F—$432,631 $0 $0..... $0 J L_ Total Design/ .......... g $52,177 $0 0,084,399 $0 $0 $0 $3,136,576 Construction l Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $1,634,417 J $�....... $563,167 I $0 Total Sources $0 _. $0..._! :._$3,136,576....._ $0 ....... ... ._$0... $0 $3,136,576.. $o GAP FUNDING $52177 $0 ($52,177) $0 $0 $0 $� $0 NEEDED L ._ —.. — -- — - -- - -- Date D Date S FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 ,PFF(roadway) $0 $0 (: L. $1,634,417 _......._.._... �$0 ......... i� $0 �; $0 PFF (med /front) - . - - -_$0 $0 $563,167 - r -- $0 - $0 $0 PFF (bridge) $0� $0 ........ _ ._._.........:1 $393,658 ----- ...- - - - - -- $0 i $0 $0 .... ;PFF (signal @ SV1� $0 $0 __ __ :__ C_- _ - -- $247,235 - -- $0 ? �- -- _ - - - - - $0 - -- - 0 :_ : : :: _ - $- ........... ...................... . 'Gas Tax so ... . .. . . $298,100 $0 i $0 $0 , Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $1,634,417 J $�....... $563,167 I $0 Total Sources $0 _. $0..._! :._$3,136,576....._ $0 ....... ... ._$0... $0 $3,136,576.. $o GAP FUNDING $52177 $0 ($52,177) $0 $0 $0 $� $0 NEEDED L ._ —.. — -- — - -- - -- Date D Date S Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No._ Snyder Lane Widening - Phase 2 1 JTrans'portation $0 TR -27 I $0 ......._ ............._............_...... .._..._._.........._._......... _......................... Project Location Description ................ ... ......... ..... __... - ...... Snyder Lane (approx. Moura Lane to Creekside MS) This project is for the widening of Snyder Lane between southside of "G" section - "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing and Creekside Middle School and includes bridges at Five Creek and Crane Department Project Manager department's Creek, four travel lanes, a Class I. bike lane on both sides, sidewalks and ............... .... _. Development Services ! ITBD work plan? landscaping. ❑ 'Project Status: _ - - - --- - - - - -- - - - - - ------------------------------- - - -- -- -- — Not in current work lan l P Justification .. _ .... ... _..1 Fundint=.Sources: According to the General Plan, project specific EIRs and the City's recent review of traffic capacity needs, this widening project is necessary to increase capacity to serve planned new development. Facilities Fee, Gas Tax TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $6,649,754 $o DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. r i FY 201.1 -1.2 FY 2012 -13 FY 201.3 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 201.5 -16 FY 2016 period IP ❑ Design /Engineering F $458,604 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o I $0 $0 ; 0 $458,604 $0 Land Costs F $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 j $0 Improvements $0 $0 .. .._..... $0 ... _....... __ .. ..................... 0 $4,586,037 ......_.. $0 i ..............__....._ .. Inspection / Clvl P $0 ! $0 ! ....... - .............. $0 ._ 0 $687,906 ......... ! $0 Contingency $0 „ $ $0 $0 $917 207 $0 ......... ........ Other Expenses $Q $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design / $0 $0 $0 0 $6,649,754 I $O-H- $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 $6,649,754 I $0 Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period L.W,761,061 ....... .......... ..._ ............... ..._$0 ..... . $2,397,112 $0 $498,991 _ . ..__..........._._._._..._$�_:. $498,991 � $0 $493,600 $o...... Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $6,649,754 $0 $6,649,754 $0 :.... ..._..... t . ...................... � : 1 GAP FUNDING.._ $... - . ...._.. $�.....- - - .._....._.._.. $0__ ..................... . $0 - -$0 .... $0. NEEDED Date D Date C $458,604 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,586,037 .. ........ $0 I... ........._..._ ............. $687,906.... �... $0...... $917,207 F $0 $0 _ $0 $6,649,754 I $0 Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period L.W,761,061 ....... .......... ..._ ............... ..._$0 ..... . $2,397,112 $0 $498,991 _ . ..__..........._._._._..._$�_:. $498,991 � $0 $493,600 $o...... Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $6,649,754 $0 $6,649,754 $0 :.... ..._..... t . ...................... � : 1 GAP FUNDING.._ $... - . ...._.. $�.....- - - .._....._.._.. $0__ ..................... . $0 - -$0 .... $0. NEEDED Date D Date C Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Snyder Lane Widening Phase 3 Transportation TR -28 ...................... ........................ ...................... ............ ...... ....._.................._._.... ! Project Location _ Description.._...._............... ._:._ .............. ............... ................................................................ ............... - ...................... ............._... .......................... _ ............ ........._ ISnyder Lane (Creekside MS to Medical Center Drive) This project is for the widening of Snyder Lane between Creekside Middle School _..._ ............................._...._.....................__...._._............................._...._..... ........__........__.........._ ....... ..........._..._....._.__...... and Medical Center Drive and includes four travel lanes, a Class II bike lane on "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing both sides, bridge crossing at Hinebaugh Creek, sidewalks and landscaping. Department Project Manager department's Development Services TBD P ❑ work plan? Project Status: - - -- --- - - - - -- - --- ---- -------------- - - - --- -- - - - - -- ..__.... - -- ....... - ------- Not in current work plan Justification _..._. _ __.... _ _,.. _.__ _...... FundineSoui ces: to the General Plan, project specific EIRs and the City's recent review of icity needs, this widening project is necessary to increase capacity to ned new development. Facilities Fee. Gas Tax TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $1,604,026 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. i FY 201.1 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 201.3 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 F1` 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 7.4 .FY 20.14 -15 FY 2015 -:16_ PFF (roadway) $0 $0 j � ................ $0 :............... - ... _ ........... $0 j ^ !....................... $0 F $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,622. Land Costs -- ... - — $315,724 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 Buildings _. $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $OJ $0 0 $0 Improvements $0 - $o F $0 _ $0 .... $0 $0.. $1,106,225......1 Inspection / CM r ........ $ _ ..... ._ $0 ...... ............ $0 ........ . ............. $0 $0 _ .................... $16 Contingency $0 $0 .... . _ $0 $0 $0 ...... _ ............ . 1 $221,245 .......................... . Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,934 $0 ... $221,245 $0 $0 $0 Total Design / ( $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,604,026 $1,604,026 ( $0 l Construction I FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 7.4 .FY 20.14 -15 FY 2015 -:16_ PFF (roadway) $0 $0 j � ................ $0 :............... - ... _ ........... $0 j ^ !....................... $0 j .... $669,692 ............................................................ PFF (med /front) $0 $0 $0 $0 �i $0 -- ... - — $315,724 PFF (bridge) $0 _...... ..._.. . . ...... . $0 $0 $0 $0 L $498,710 -- — - Gas Tax $0 $0. _. $0 $0 $0 1. — $119,900 ...... $0 $0 $0 ( $0 _!. $0 $0 - Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period F—.. 692......_ $0 .. ...... $315,724 -- F— !498,710. $0 _! _ ........... _ . .... - .._. ...... _ .............. $119,900 j $0 1 L... ............. ................... - -' L so- $0 ........... $o..._ Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,604,026 $1,604,026 $0 ....._ . ___ _ _ ..1 GAP FUNDING $0 __.._..$0 .. - -- -- $�-- _ $�— -- ......._...._ ....._$0 .... . -- - -- $0_ $0 $0 NEEDED Date D Date C Project Description J 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. :Rohnert Park Expressway Widening - East Transportation $0 2005 -10 TR -29 $0 Project Location 0 $0 Description Rohnert Park Expressway Land Costs ....... _ ... . ................... . . . . . . . . . . . This project is for the widening of Rohnert Park Expressway between Snyder Lane "Project _ .......... ......................... ............................... and Petaluma Hill Road and includes four travel lanes, a Class I bike lane on both Owner" Implementing In implementing sides, sidewalks and landscaping. This project includes traffic signal devices / Department Project Manager department's work improvements at Petaluma Hill Road. "Other" project expense includes . Development Services :TBp plan? ❑ environmental mitigation. Project Status $0 ----------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- - -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- ------ — -- - - -- Not in current work plan $0 Justification Fundinl=Sources: ._______.. Jing to the General Plan, project specific EIRs and the City's recent review of capacity needs, this widening project is necessary to increase capacity to planned new development. I.Public Facilities Fee TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $8,517,548 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS. Project costs Costs after through 5_yr. CIP t - FY 2011-1.2 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -1.5 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 j $0 I $0 $35,045 ! $0 $536,983 0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $1,144,056 U .......... - $0 $3,955,014 $0 $223,140 $0 I D i $0 $0 $0 i $0 $0 Buildings $Q $0 _......... $ $0 $0 0 i $0 Improvements $0 $0 L..--- $0 i . .. so so $o $0 , . $0 I�� $0 ........ $0 0 $5,720,281 .... L $0 Inspection / CM $ $0 ......... ( $0 ......:.. 0 $858,042 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 1,144056 F $0 Other Expenses ............. $0 ,. $0 $223,140 $0 I $0 F $0 $572,028 $0 $0 $0 $0 j $0 I $0 $0 $0 $5,720,281 ....... .. ................ ....... . .... . .. ....... . l .............. ._......__................._.__ $0 $858,042 $0 $0 $1,144,056 U .......... - $0 $3,955,014 $0 $223,140 $0 ...... Total Design/ $35,045 $0 $760,123 $0 $7,722,380 $0 $8,517,548 ( $0 Construction - FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 PFF (roadway) $0 (�$0 $4,073,994 $0 j $0 I $0 I ...._... . ................... I- ......_..._., ......__........._ ................. . .. ....... . l .............. ._......__................._.__ 'PFF (med /frontage) $0 $0 -- $0 U .......... - $0 $3,955,014 -$0 PFF (Sig @ PHR) $0 $0 ..... :......_.._.......� . __....... $0 ........................... $0 $265,400 ..................... _ ........ -.- ............. ................. $0 _......... __......._. .............l PFF (emn- ronmental) $0 $0 ...... $223,140 . $0 $0 L..--- $0 i . .. so so $o .........__._ $0 L -- , . $0 I�� $0 i . Total Sources - ............__... .._.._$0......! ... $4,297,13 $0.._._ Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $8,517,548 $0 .... ........ _ ._.._ .......................... ................... ............................... GAP FUNDING F $35,045 - $0 (�($3,537,011) $0 $3,501,966 $0 I $0 $0 NEEDED 1________.._ - - -- -- -- -- - - -- Date D Date E Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to .FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Dowdell Avenue (375'N to 750'S of Wilfred Ave) Transportation TR -30 ........... ....._:..._.__......_.. ............ _ ..... ........ ............... ...._ .._.._..:.............. .......... _._..._.. __. ....... ............... ......................... ....................... _I Project Location Description �Dowdell Avenue - .. _ ... . This project is for the reconstruction of Dowdell between 375' north of Wilfred Ave. to 750' south of Wilfred Ave and includes two travel lanes, Class II bike lane on "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing both sides, sidewalks and landscaping. Department Project Manager department's pg, p ............................. ........................_...... ,................................... ............................... IDevelo ment Services ; jTBD work plan? Project Status: -- - -- - - - - -- -- - -- -- - -- — - - - -- -- — -- - -- JNot in current work plan (Primarily a developer -built project.) ...................... .... .....__... . _....._ _ ..._.._... .Justification .... FundingSout ces: ........... ling to the General Plan, project specific EIRs and the City's recent review of capacity needs, this widening project is necessary to increase capacity to planned new development. 'Public Facilities Fee (Developer project / City staff support) TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $10,000 $0 FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011-12 FY 2012 -13 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after i t FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 201.3 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 through FY 2016 5 -yr. CIP period ❑ Design /Engineering $0 $ 001 00 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $10,000 $0 -Land Costs $0 I $0 $0 , $0 $0 Buildings $0 I $0 $0 ' $0 ' $0 I 7--s-671 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 t_.._._.._ ..... _ . ...._ $0 �$0 $0 $0 ..... $0 $0 Inspection / CM $ .. ..._..._ $o ....... .........._..............__.... ...... _ .. - -- -- -._.__ ...._....._.......... - - -- -� Contingency $0 $0 f..... $0 � $0 $0 ( $0 , $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 ......... $0 $0 ..:..... ... .. ........... ..... .......__� $0 I $0 $0 —6 —I $0 Total Design/ g $0' $10,000 $0 $0 $0 , $0 $10,000 �� $0 I Construction. .... FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011-12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 ;PEEP $0 € �$10,000� l._......._ ...... ......................_._.....� $0 ...... ............................... . $0 . 11^ $0 $0 $0 so —1 ^ $0 r i - - $0 I { I - - -- $0 I $0 $0 _ �$0� I........_....._... ------ .._._ : $0 . ._.__.. $0 : I $0 ........ $0 - ......_ ............. .. �- $o l $0 $o $o $0 ; $o ....... .........._..............__.... ...... _ .. - -- -- -._.__ ...._....._.......... - - -- -� -- - - -- - ....... - -- -- _- .... _ .... _ -- ........... .............._._, :.._..__..._.: - - ._..._._.._. ...... _ ............. ...................... -- ......._..... $o $6 i $ ° -- $a $o _ $o Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $o_ $o . Total Sources $0 _$10 000... ......_ . . $0....... $0 .' L .... $° $.... - .._._$10,000..... $0.. GAP FUNDING $0! $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NEEDED __...— -- ._......_...__ _.. -- -- Date D Date D Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to .FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. C.IP No. ;Dowdell Avenue (Business Park Dr to Martin Ave) ;Transportation $0 TR -32 $0 :............................. .................................. .................... ............................................................................... ............................... Project Location Description .......... ............ ......... .......... .... _ 'Dowdell Avenue (Business Park Dr to Martin Ave) This project is for the reconstruction of Dowdell between Business Park Drive and "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing :Martin Avenue and includes two travel lanes, Class II bike lane on both sides, Department Project Manager department's sidewalks and landscaping. Development Services 'TBD work plan. ......... . ......... _..........._..__... ....... Project Status: - -- . ._..- - -- .... -- ..__.. - - - -- - - - - ... -------- - .._...- 'Not in current work plan Justification .......... ....... FnndinoSourcec: ding to the General Plan, project specific EIRs and the City's recent review of capacity needs, this widening project is necessary to increase capacity to planned new development. is Facilities Fee TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $1,958,512 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5 -yr. C1P i - FY 201.1 -12 FY 2012 -1.3 FY 201:3 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 . FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering $0 ; $0 $0 $0 $0. $0 $1,350,698 $0 $1 $0 ............ $0 $0 Land Costs F---$-0q $0 ..............._..$....... _.._ . ....... -$ 0--.:. ......... . ......... _..........._..__... ....... $ 0 $0 —so $0 $0 Buildings $0 ( $0 _.. - -- ............. ... . — --- ... $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 H $0 $0 Improvements $ ... _ .. ......$0... $0.......� Inspection/ CIVI $q ( so . $0 $202,605 ! $0 $0 .. Contingency $0 _ ..... .. $0 ................. (�$0 (. ......... .. $270,140 $0 $0 Other Expenses F_______$_01 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,070 $0 $0 $0 $0. $_0 $1,350,698 $0 202,605 ............ $0 $270140 $0 $0 $0 Total Design / $0 $0 $0 $1,958,512 I $0 $0 ( $1,958,512 $0 Construction I L FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 PFF (roadway) $0 $0 ! $0 $732,672 $0 ..._... J $0 l -- - - - -- - -- ..._._ __...__.._ PFF med /front ( ) $0 $0 .. $0 _ ..............._..$....... _.._ . ....... -$ 0--.:. ......... . ......... _..........._..__... ....... ......__. ......._............,._$0....._ .. ....._.._.._.......__...$0...._ 0 $0 $0 $0 _ ..__..... --- ( $0 _.. - -- ............. ... . — --- ... $0 ..... $0 I ! $0 $0 I Total Sources $0 $0 '.-so ....._.... ........ $1�958,512� $0 1 ................... ......................... . ..... � ;......__........ .._................_.........._ Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP . FY 2016 period $732,672.. t ......... _. $0...... $1,225,8 -- - - -J 0 1 $1,958,512 ......_. .... ....................._$0....... . GAP FUNDING $0 j $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 NEEDED - -- - - - ........................ __...._..__ Date D Date D Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. 2011 Various Streets Overlays ITransportation 112010-09 R -75 Project Location Description !Segments of Santa Dorotea Circle, Camino Colegio .. . ........ .. ...................................................._.........._.........._......................_......................................................................................................_....... ............................... 1.5" - 3" overlay of Santa Dorotea between Daniel and Davis, Santa Dorotea ___._.'....._ ............._._........_.___............................................._......,_..:....._.....__.......__......_.._.._ ......_._...................... between Dexter and Dorian, and Camino Colegio between Southwest Blvd. and ! Project Owner" Implementing In implementing East Cotati Avenue. ADA upgrades to curb ramps. Department Project 1Vlanager department's (Development Services P. Barnes work plan. O Project Status: - -- -- -- ------------- - - - - -- ---- .._....__..__..__.... -- - - - - --°---------- ---------- --- -------- -- - - - - - -i (Construction in Summer 2011. Justification FundingSources: _ Prop. 1B TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $771,180 $0 \n ongoing pavement preservation program is needed to maintain the streets in rood condition. DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP W MFY201.142 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering Date 2 $0 $0 $80,000 1 ; i�' $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 ...$53;180..._. $0 $0 $I $0 $0 ; $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 ^ 0 $0 Improvements $0 I $588 000....._ $0 $0 $0 $0.... Inspection / CM F77$0 ' $53,180 _......_.._ .. $0........_ ... — 1 .......... $o. '; $� ...._.... .. $�.._ Contingency ..... . $0 .._$50,000...... - ..._... $0 ...._ . ............ $0 i ._.... $0$ Other Expenses $0 ', $0 $0 $0 $0 IF $0I $80,000 Date 2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6 $588,000 $0 ...$53;180..._. $0 $50,000 $0 .... .. ...... .......... ... .._ Total Design/ ......... ..... f $0 l g $80,000 ,' ( $691,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $771,180 I Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources „ $80,000 ...$... 6.. 91,180 .._.... $0....... __ $�.. i . $0 $0 $771,180.. $0.._. ...... GAP FUNDING F ... $-0--] ` - - —$0- - $0 - --- ..._._...-- _$0..._::- $0 $0 - -$� ---- ... -$0 NEEDED _ ......... _.... . .......... ............ Date D Date 2 Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. :Arlen Drive and East Cotati Avenue Overlays ITransportation 2010 -07 TR -78 ......... ..._....._. ........ ............_..........__._._.._........:...._.._._........_..._.......__........_.. ._..........._._..........._... Project Location Description Segments of Arlen Drive, East Cotati Avenue .........- ........ ..................._. _......._..................._.. .._..._..._.._.............._.........................................._.._....._........_..._... ............__..._.__.......... ;Overlay of Arlen Drive (Commerce Blvd. to Adrian Avenue) and East Cotati Avenue (Snyder Lane to east City Limits, eastbound only), "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing ( y y y), in accordance with Department Project Manager department's City's Pavement Maintenance Program and Federal -aid restrictions limiting funding ............... ............................... ........ ........................._...., . _ ..._........_._._.............. to roads on the Federal -aid Highway Classification System. !Development Services HP. Barnes _ work plan: Project Status: ------ - - - - -- - -- --------- - - - - -- — - - -- - -- - -- - - - - -- - Design in progress Construction planned for Summer 2012. Justification _._. Fundm:?Sources. nent management is an ongoing program needed to maintain the streets in condition. M, Federal (STP /CMAQ), Prop. 42, Gas Tax TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $1,114,750 $0 Project costs DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Costs after through 5-yr. CIP t t FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -1.3 FY 201:3 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design/Engineering $70,25�0 ' $30,000 $0 !. $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $844,500 _. ...... ............ _.... $0 i $0 $0 $0 i $0 $0 Buildings $0 $5,250 $0 $0 $0 - .._..... 0 $0 $0 $0� $0 Improvements $0 $0 $120,000 —$724,500 0 $0 $0 Inspection /. Ci✓f ....... $o $ti $o....1...... $0 i i�...... $o ( L - -- $o...... $0 $ 00 $8.5 ,0 ._........ .. . $0 $0 $0 Contingency , F____$_0_1 $0 ....... ........................ $85,000 ......... .............. $0 ............ ..... $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $100,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $844,500 _. ...... ............ _.... $0 ......... ........ .$85,0 ._ . __ J I� - -. _ _ .._._ $250,000 .._.. -- -- _.. — -- $0 $0 ......._$85 000...... $$p0....� �._. $0 $0 Total Design/ $70,250 i $150,000 $894,500 $0 $0 $0 I $1,114,750 ( $0 _I Construction I FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP t t FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period Federal .s.... 0 $0 _ ........................_.., ;.................._ $563,000 ..............._............... $0 $0 L................ ............................... t._....._......_.............. i._..........._._ $0 . ..............................J $563,00 i.......__......... $0 Measure M $65,000 $150,000 —_ - -- - - -. _ _ .._._ $250,000 .._.. -- -- _.. — -- $0 $0 $0 .._......._...................i - -- -- - -, $465,000 �1 - - - - -- $0 $5,250 $0 Prop. 42 $5 250 l $0 j .....::: l......._ $0 - .._..... $0 0 _..... - -- -- .................... 0 _................... $81,500 __ $0 Gas Tax I $0 $0 _ . $81,500 - - -- $0 $0 -___ -_ -___ $0� . -- - -- - -- - $o $o ....... $o $ti $o....1...... $0 i i�...... $o ( L - -- $o...... Total Sources $70250 $�150,000� $894,500 $0 ; $0 $0 $1,114750 ------------- $0 L_ . . ......... . ...... GAP FUNDING $0 I $_0_1 $ $0 $0 $0 — $0 $0 NEEDED L — ...--- ----.._..__ ...._._...... Date D Date A Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -1.2 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Copeland Creek Bike Path Reconstruction Transportation 2010 -08 TR -79 Project Location Description Segments of Copeland Creek Bike Path .......................... _......._.................................................._........._ ........................ ......................... . ......... _........__........_. _. _.. . ;Reconstruction of deteriorated sections of Copeland Creek Bike Path between ................................._............................ ...... _ ............... _. ........... .................................................... ....................................... Commerce Blvd. and Seed Farm Drive, and Snyder Lane and Sonoma State "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing University. Department Project Manager department's Development Services T. Bertolero work plan! Project Status: _ - - --- ---- — - -- ------------ --- - (Environmental documentation, design Justification _..._. _.._... .... - -_... ..__........ Fundmi=Sout ces: City regularly receives request from citizens, SSU students and staff, and 'USD students and staff to fix the most deteriorated sections of the Copeland k Bike Path. In some locations, the pavement has deteriorated such that irs like crack sealing, patching and even overlays will provide little to no :dy. Reconstructing the path will restore usefulness and safe conditions to the t well - traveled, east -west recreation and alternative transportation facility in iert Park. 'Gas Tax, Measure M, Federal (Transportation Enhancement ;program) TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $800,000 ( $o Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period ................ $80,000_.....1 FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after FY 201.2 -13 -.13 #Y20.13-1.4 through FY 2016 5 yr. CIP ❑ iiiiiiiiiwarAuttlipillilllFY2011-1.2 $0 1. $0 FY 2012 FY 2014 -15 FY 201.5 -16 period Design /Engineering $80,000 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 �� $150,000 $0 Land Costs F $0 $0 $0 $0 j $0 r $0 F $o $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ! $0 $0 0 Improvements $0 $50,000 ...... .. $600,00. $0 $0 I $0 ............................. ! $650,000 $0 Inspection / CM �..... $0 0 1 $0 :.... $o $� .. L ...................... �. I ......... ...... Contingency $ t) $0 ; $0 $0 $0 $0 .... ......... $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $80,000 (J $120,000 $600,000 [ - $0 $0 $0 $800,000 [1 $0 f Construction _ ... . - Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period ................ $80,000_.....1 FUNDING SOURCES PFFP project ❑ $, 50, 000 -0,000 FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 20.14 -15 FY 2015 -16 ,Gas Tax $80 000 $0 l $0 $0 1. $0 $o i $0 I ._ ......... . .... _.._..- - Measure M - -- — $0 - - - -- -- $50,000 -- $0 - - - -. ........ ,. $0 - $0 -- - -- - ----- ..._.. -- $0 Federal $0 ( $70,000 $600,000 $0 0 $0 .......... .......................... $ $o j _ $0 ............__._ ......... ....... $0 _ o _ ............._....... ....... . $o .... _ .... _ ... ............._._ ... .......... ... - -- 0 - $......... . . ...... ........ $0 a —$o , , $$o Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period ................ $80,000_.....1 .__.. _ ...................._$0....... PFFP project ❑ $, 50, 000 -0,000 Copeland Creek Bike Path Reconstruction Last printed TR -79 Friday, June 17, 20114:26:53 PM $67 $0 $O - - - -- -_ $o $0 Total Sources $80,000 $120,000 $600,000 $0 . i..._.. $0 $O ( $800 000 GAP FUNDING __ $0... _$� - - -- - -$� ------$._.._.__ . ........................_$0.... _...__.._$0 I $0 - -$0 NEEDED Date Date originally last submitted _ revised 2/28/2010 06/02/2011 l Unfunded / Underfunded ❑ PFFP project ❑ City funding share source is identified 0 City funding share is committed Reso No.2010 -43 Mechanism J Copeland Creek Bike Path Reconstruction Last printed TR -79 Friday, June 17, 20114:26:53 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. ;Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project ITransportation 112011-02 ......................... TR- 80................I .......... .................... . Project Location DescriptionVarious locations throughout City ............................................................ _.... _..._.............._...._...... ..._......._.__............_... .... __......_._.........._.............._..__....._.....................__...._._.._..._.._....._ ................... ......._ ..._................_:........i :Pedestrian safety improvements citywide, including: signing, striping, curb ramp ;upgrades, signal timing adjustments, and battery power backup for continued "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing ;traffic control during power outages. Includestraffic signal installation at Department Project Manager department's g g Development Services P. Barnes work plan? :intersection of Rancho Verde Mobile Home Park at Rohnert Park Expressway. Project Status. IScoping /study, preliminary engineering & design. . ............. .... Justification FundineSources: This project combines recommendations of a recent pedestrian safety study of ITraffic Safety Fund, Traffic Signalization Fund, Gas Tax Snyder Lane and staff recommendations for improvement of safety for pedestrians at intersections and crosswalks. TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $540,000 $0 ........._$0.......I ........... .......................$0...... $540,000 $0 ............... ...:................. ............................... GAP FUNDING F $Q .....__..__.._......_ $0 ...... -- .............. _ . $ . . 0 .... ..................... . _......_..._$ 0........_. ......._......__......_$�...... ---- .._....._.... $0 ( —�_ $0 _ $0 NEEDED Date D Date C DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after i - FY 201.1 -1.2 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 through FY 2016 5 -v r. CIP period ❑ Design/Engineering g b! 30,000 : $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $0 Land Costs $t) , ; $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 ':. i $0 !!�� $0 $0 $0 Improvements ........._...$.....5.... . ..... $0..... $0 .._..... $0 $0.... $510,000 ......... .... $0 Inspection / CiVt $0 $0 1 $4 .1Q,000 $0 $0 $0 i $0 L... ....... Contingency $0 $0 (—$0 I_......... $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 Total Design/ ( $30,OOQ $510,000 $0 �- ......- $0 ' $0 $0 $540,000 $0 l Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ........._$0.......I ........... .......................$0...... $540,000 $0 ............... ...:................. ............................... GAP FUNDING F $Q .....__..__.._......_ $0 ...... -- .............. _ . $ . . 0 .... ..................... . _......_..._$ 0........_. ......._......__......_$�...... ---- .._....._.... $0 ( —�_ $0 _ $0 NEEDED Date D Date C Project Descript1011 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. '2013 Various Streets Preventive Maintenance ITransportation T R -81 ........................................ ............ ._..._......._.._._.. ...........__.._._............. _..._...._ ........... ........ _..................... .........._......_.....__...... Project Location Description...... ITBD ............... ......_.... ....._..... ............_............ ................... ........_.............. 'Digouts and crack seal in Summer 2012 and slurry seal in Spring /Summer 2013. _..._...._._ ...... ......._............._..._..... of select roads per the Pavement Management Program. "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing D_ epartment Project Manager department's Development Services ;:P. Barnes work plan? F Project Status: ..................... - ------------------ - -- ------------- --- ---------------- - -- -- .._...__.... -- Not in current work plan. Justification _...__. _..._.. FundtnLySoui ces uses preventive maintenance performance to inform the allocation of regional Is for local street and road maintenance. The 2010 update of Rohnert Park's ement Management Program calculated that 9% of the City's annual streets ntenance budget should be for preventive maintenance, i.e. pavement iagement treatment on streets with PCI or 70 or above. This project helps to II this goal, as well as extend the life of streets by 5 -7 years. M, Gas Tax TOTAL PROJECT COST (.Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $550,000 $0 Project costs DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS throu It Costs after g FY 2016 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 ........ _ ............ . . 5 -yr. CIP period ❑ $0 1. $0 $35,000........ i i FY 2011 -1.2 FY 2012-13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 20.15 -16 Design/Engineering g b $0 ! $0 $0 $0 ! . $0 $0 Land Costs $300,000 $0 ! I $0 ...._....._.......; $0 $0 � $0 $0 —so $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 I 0 $0 Improvements $6, $ $480,000 .._. $0 $0... $0.... Inspection/ CM $0 $0 $ 0 $ 0 ' $0 ; $0 I. ....� ....................... $0 ............................... $35,000 $0 !; $0 .. ........... ...... _ ..... _........_._._...._ $0 L..........._............ Contingency $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 F--so $0' 0 $0 $0 g FY 2016 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 ........ _ ............ . . 5 -yr. CIP period ❑ $0 1. $0 $35,000........ FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 $0 $35,000 ....... _ ....... ... Measure M $0 $0 $250,000 ........... ............__...._._...._..... $0 - ......._. Total Design/ $0 $0 s666,666 $0 : $0 ; $0 $550,000 $0 Construction I . ....... l FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources $0 $55Q000 �$0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0 GAP FUNDING $0 S ._._....__.......__$0._.. _.. - -- $0 - - - -- $0 - - -- - -$� _ $0....._ - -- $0 _ $0 NEEDED Date D FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013-1.4 FY 20.14 -15 FY 20.15 -16 Measure M $0 . $0 l $250,000 ........... ............__...._._...._..... $0 ................ !............... ---so-] ...._.............................:............................ — $0 . 'Gas Tax $0 $0 $300,000 $0 ! I $0 ...._....._.......; $0 - -- ..........._$0..._ ._..........._...........__$ .......: ............. _......... ...... __ $� ._ _.......... _. ........................... .._.__$�........ ... _.._..--- ............_....- $0 $0 $0 $ 0 $ 0 ' $0 ; - - -� . Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources $0 $55Q000 �$0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0 GAP FUNDING $0 S ._._....__.......__$0._.. _.. - -- $0 - - - -- $0 - - -- - -$� _ $0....._ - -- $0 _ $0 NEEDED Date D Date 2 Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -1.2 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. 12014 Street Maintenance Project I ITransportation TR -82 .......__..._......._ .........:............................... ..... . ...................... ............._ . _..................__....._........__.................. ...._._......................_. Project Location Description..__._......._ .............._._ ..... __...............__................................. _........._..:. rrTBD ......... ........ . _. ... _. . Overlay of selected streets based on Pavement Management Program. "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing Department Project Manager department's Development Services iP. Barnes work plan? ❑ Project Status: - - - -- ............. ......................................... ._ ......... -- -- -- -- - ---- -------- -- ----------------- - Not in current work plan Justification ................ ............................... ....... ................. ........ ................ .... .. FundingSources: Extend the useful life of City streets in accordance with the Pavement, Gas Tax, Measure M, Gas Excise Tax ( "Prop. 42 swap ") 'Management Program. TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $1,010,000 F $o DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS i FY 201.1 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Design /Engineering $07 $0 � $0 Contingency Land Costs $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 Other Expenses Buildings $o I $0 $O J $0 . $0 $0 Mechanism Friday, June 17, 20114:26:53 PM $0 I Improvements $0 $0 ......... ................. $0 $800,000 $0 $0 Inspection / CM _.. $0 $0 $0 _..__. ........ ......... ... $70,000 $0 $0 ......... ......... Contingency $200,000 $0 _..._ _ �. $0 $0 $0 , 000 $0 $0 Other Expenses ............. __..... ...... .. ....... ._......._. ..$....7.....0....,.. .................. . $0 Mechanism Friday, June 17, 20114:26:53 PM $0 I $0 $0 Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP FY 2016 period ❑ ..._.......$70,000 FY 201.2 -13 $0 FY 2015 -16 'Gas Tax $0 �.. $0� $70,000 .....1.... $200,000 $0 _..._ _ �. $0 Measure M $0 $800,000 $0 $0 - - - -- -- $340,000 $0 $70,000 ................... ............ _ . _ . .................. . $0 $7.... - -- - $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $70,000 $940,000 i $0 $0 $1,01 0,000 f $0 .Construction ' L� ..... .....� FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 'Gas Tax $0 �.. $0� $70,000 .....1.... $200,000 $0 _..._ _ �. $0 ....... Measure M $0 U submitted revised $0 $0 - - - -- -- $340,000 $0 - - - -- -- - $0 ❑ ❑ Mechanism Friday, June 17, 20114:26:53 PM Gas Excise Tax (Prop $0 '� I $0 $0 $400,000 $0— : $0' 42 swaP) ........... ................_..........:::. t _.._.__..._..._.__.. ........ _ so 0 ... .._. $o $o $o $o .. ....... $o Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period �. $z o ... $o $346000 $0 $400,000 -; $0 ........ $ _:...! C _ .............................$ $o j $o Total Sources $0 $0$0 $70,000 F $940000 $0 $0 ! �$1,010�,000 $0 l.......... � :.............. l ......I l NEEDED DING ....... ..- $ - - - --- -- $0 - - - -- $0 _. -_ ..................... $0 $0 $0 $0 Date Date City y funding :share source is identified 2014 Street Maintenance Project originally last Unfunded/ PFFP Last printed TR -82 submitted revised nderfunded project City funding share is committed ❑ _- ____ -- . -- 4/21/2011 04/21/2011 1 ❑ ❑ Mechanism Friday, June 17, 20114:26:53 PM Pr`ect Description 5-Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11-12 to FY 15-16 01 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Water Main Improvement Project �Water Systems 2004-08 -04 ............. . ......... . ... . . Project Location Description Various streets ...... . .. . . ....... .. ............................................. . .. .............. ............ ............ ..... . .......... .. - ...................................... ......... ..................... .......... Construct approximately 1.6 miles of water distribution pipelines from eight to sixteen inches in diameter. Construct pressure regulating stations to regulate "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing transmission Department art ment's system pressure down to distribution system pressure. (Formerly D ............... Project Manager dep ...... . . .. 'called "System Distribution Improvements", also called "Eastside Water System Development Services ..P. Barnes work plan? 'improvements" and "Westside Water System Improvements" in PFFP. Project Status: ------------ JDesign in progress; project on hold. Justification FundinffSources: water system improvements are all intended to provide adequate service for development. While new development will place day-to-day demands on the w system associated with new water uses, the primary design factor that ributes the need for and sizing of the improvements is Fire Flow. The water am improvements are intended to allow the whole water system to deliver a gn fire flow of 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM). 'Public Facilities Fee TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $2,451,951 . .................... $0 � ... . ........ ............ DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP FY 201.1-1.2 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design/Engineering F-110 $o 1. I IF - ---$o-] I —$o $83,523 $0 1 $0 Land Costs F . ...... F F_$490,390 ............... F—so F—$o $0 J F Buildings F _._$_07 17--s0 F—$o —$o I $0 Fs0 Improvements F----$—O-ll—$o .......... .. . .... ....... [—$o .1 ................ $1,348,573 ............... ........................ .................... ...................... Inspection/ CM A$o ............... ....................... ..................... I ...................... 6- F_$0 1 ..................... . ... s367,793 !1— _-_$01 '$O ... . ............................. . ............. ........................................ Contingency .............. �fl F ................... ........... $o ........... ............... 490390 $, ............... .......... ................. . . ....... Other Expenses !—$o F—$o $0 F_ . F—$245,195 I. ____ .................. $o 1. I IF - ---$o-] IF F$ —1,348,573 $ $0 F--$-367.-793 $ . ...... F F_$490,390 ............... .................. . . ...... $0 $2,206,756 Total Design/ $o $�o Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-1.4 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 IPEEP .............$.....1. 61,M F-................. $o I . ...... -V...8.....3.—...,..6... . 2 ....3 .... ....... F $....2.....,..2.. .0.....6. . ,..7... . 5 ....6 .... 11 .... ... ... ............... $ 0 $0 F ' ..... I .......... ** . .. .... $o $0 $0 ............................. - ....... . .... .... F .$0 F. . . - ......... . ................ . .. $ . .o .... ...... ................... . ......... $0 ......... . .. .................... . . . ........ . ............ .................................... . ......... $0 $0 $0 $0 . ..... . .................... . ------ ------- .... . .......... . . ..... . . . ............................... . .... - .......... ............ ............. ................. ......... .. .. ..... .. $o $0 ... . ........ . ........................... . ...... . ...... - Funding Funding beyond through 5-year CIP FY 2016 period 2,451,6-5-1 $_01 ......... __ ..... . ..... . ............................ F—vo-11 $o1 ............ __ . . ......... . ...... . . ........ . ... . . ..... ...... $o F-$ol ........ . .. . $o L------- _ ---------------------- .............. .......... _$0 $83,523 Total Sources F_T61_,�672 F$_o7I F—$2,206,756 0 L------------ – --- ........... ........................ .. . ........... H ............ GAP FUNDING F-----$—O—] F_$0 $0 $o I F$o I F$0 _1 F$6__1 NEEDED L .......... . ........ _: .... . . ....... J L ........... . ____ ................... . . . . ................................ . ................. ...... . ....... I. .. . . ............... . . . . .. . ..... . ...... ...................... . ..... . ...... . ....... . Date Date Water Main Improvement Project Unfunded / ity funding share source is identified E] ded/ PFFP originally last submitted revised Underfunded project City funding share is committed ❑ WA-04 Last printed ------------- 3/23/20 ❑ 6i 66/08/2011 Mechanism Friday, June 17, 20114:26:63 PM ........ . .... .... ......... Funding Funding beyond through 5-year CIP FY 2016 period 2,451,6-5-1 $_01 ......... __ ..... . ..... . ............................ F—vo-11 $o1 ............ __ . . ......... . ...... . . ........ . ... . . ..... ...... $o F-$ol ........ . .. . $o L------- _ ---------------------- .............. .......... _$0 $83,523 Total Sources F_T61_,�672 F$_o7I F—$2,206,756 0 L------------ – --- ........... ........................ .. . ........... H ............ GAP FUNDING F-----$—O—] F_$0 $0 $o I F$o I F$0 _1 F$6__1 NEEDED L .......... . ........ _: .... . . ....... J L ........... . ____ ................... . . . . ................................ . ................. ...... . ....... I. .. . . ............... . . . . .. . ..... . ...... ...................... . ..... . ...... . ....... . Date Date Water Main Improvement Project Unfunded / ity funding share source is identified E] ded/ PFFP originally last submitted revised Underfunded project City funding share is committed ❑ WA-04 Last printed ------------- 3/23/20 ❑ 6i 66/08/2011 Mechanism Friday, June 17, 20114:26:63 PM ........ . .... .... ......... Project Description 5-Year Capital Improvement Program ITY 11-12 to FY 15-16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. .Recycled Water System Expansion lWater Systems -03 Description Project Location ITBD .Expand the recycled water system including transmission, storage and site retrofits "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing accordance with the updated Incremental Recycled Water Master Plan (I RWMP) Department Project Manager department's !Development Services i�:TBD work plan? Project Status: Justification FundinqSaurcei: will serve most a recycled water projects m avoid water system expansion. TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5 FY 201.1-12 FY 201243 YY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 Fy' 2015-16 FY 2016 period El Design/Engineering 5-year cIP FY 2016 $0 r _$50,000 $0 so ' Land Costs ` ~____—__�------___^.^_____--� F so Buildings $0 so so � `~mp^`^~~~s L��L____��_L��-__ ��___' ��JL___�-~._�____�._� � Inspection ` /Cm« so IF s7o Contingency ' —so F—so Total Design/ so s66,666 1 $600,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding Funding beyond through 5-year cIP FY 2016 period ' Total 8ounom ^__`_____`_______.�-______.�______- �_______ ................................ 415 $0 so ` Date D Date originally ^ Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Water Storage Tanks Exterior Painting Project ! Water Systems [2008-03 WA -23 .............. _ ............... ._.. ........................ .............. ....... .............................. Project Location Description Water storage tanks 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 .........._ . .. ......... 9 ....... .._.... .......... Repaint exterior surfaces of water storage tanks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 "Project Owner' Implementing In implementing Department Project Manager department's ..................... ....................., Public Wks / Comm Svcs P. Barnes work plan? Project Status: - -- - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - ------ - - - - -- Awaiting CIP approval to initiate project. 3 ustification FundingSources Water storage tank exteriors require repainting as routine maintenance to protect steel from deterioration. Tank surfaces will be prepared and if necessary repaired prior to be repainted Costs will be considerably less if existing lead paint is not present. 2005 CSCDA Water Revenue Bond TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded _ . .................._ _ $1,201,200 �... ..................................._$ 0 ............................... DESIGNICONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP FY 2011 -1.2 FY 2012 -13 FY 201.3 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering $1 200 $0 $0 $0 F7 7V200 F —so $0 $0 $0 �� $0 Land Costs $0 j - $0 $0 $0 ! $0 1 $0 Buildings $0 j $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Improvements $0 j $1200,000 ....... -- .......................:... $0 .. $0 $0 ......_....... $0 Inspection ! CM o - - =- $0 h1. $0 $0 $0 $0 _ r $0 Contingency g $0 I I........ $0 $0 $0 $0 ................................. i;_....... $0 .Other Expenses $0 � r $0 (—$0 - -- $0 $0 r $0 $1,200 $1 200 $0 $0 $0 $0 i!, $0 $1;200,000 ........ $0.. F ....... $° L $o__. $0....... -- $0 ........... _....... Total Design/, $1,200 i $1,200,000 $0 $0 , l g $0 $0 $1,201,200 (.......... .. $t1 I Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Water Revenue $1 200 $1,200,000...._. $o... $o $ i!, Bond .......:: .., _.. :.......... ..$.....0 ... _..._... - --- 0 $o — $0 $o f —$o , -- - $o $o ! $o _.____..._.______.___i __ _ $0 ._ __..... �._... $o o - - =- — $0 $0 -- $0 $0 ' $0 — $0 ..... $o , $o..... i $o .._ I $o . i ... $a . I .o.... Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources $1,200 ! $1,200,000 . $0 $0 0 $0 $1,201,200 $0 I .._... GAP FUNDING $Q ......... GAP __... -- $0 -- ..:— ._.....:$�__'...__..__..... - $0.... -- ........__..._ $0 $0 - - .....:. -- - -$0 NEEDED Date D Date C Project Description I 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. ;Commerce Water Line Replacement FS' 2016 lwater Systems $0 ........ FY 201.1 -1.2 FY 2012 -13 WA -27 FY 2015 -16 ............. ........ _ .............. _._.................. .................................. ............................................................................. Project Location ............................................ _ ....... .......I Description _ ............ _.... _........ ...... ... ..................... . ......_ Commerce Boulevard $0 1 Upgrade water line along Commerce Boulevard from Utility Court to Golf Course "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing Drive and along Golf Course Drive from Commerce Boulevard to Roberts Lake Department Project Manager department's :Road Public Wks / Comm Svcs I P. Barnes work plan? � $0 Project Status: 0 - - - ------------ - - - --.... - ................ - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- ----------- - Not in current work plan $0 Justification .................. __ - .. ..._......- FundinuSonrrec _.._..... .1..... .... existing water lines in this area are undersized or non - existent. service charges TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $340,000 1 F-so Project costs Costs after through DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS FS' 2016 period ❑ $0 ........ FY 201.1 -1.2 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 .Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 Land Costs Mechanism Waterrate model Friday, June 17, 20114:26:53 PM __. � $0 $0 ' 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings ............._._.._.... - --, $0 .. .-- ...-- ..._........--- ........ � $0 1—so $0 .__............_ $0 I $0 i 0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $340,000 :.... $0.....:... $0 $0..... Inspection / CM $0 . $0 $0 .................... �$0 .. $ F$......... I Contingency $0 i $0 ......... $0 $0 I'. . ............ _ ..... ...... $0 $0 Other Expenses � $0 i 0 (L $0 $0 $0 $0 Project costs Costs after through 5 yr. CIP FS' 2016 period ❑ $0 ........ $0 FY 201546 $0 _ $0 $340,000 $0 $0 $0 $340,000 $0 ❑ Mechanism Waterrate model Friday, June 17, 20114:26:53 PM __. � $0 -- . Total Design / $0 $0 $340,000 $0 $0 $0 $340,000 $0 I Construction - Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources $0 $0 ! $340,000 �$0 i $0 $0 ' I $340,000 $0 :........... .............. ................. 1.............._... .........._.................... ......__...._. ............_............._.._� L_.._............. ...................._.........1 GAPFUNDING - -- .......__.__...: .._._. _..._........_.._$0 _....._.__... - - -$� -- .._..:-- --- .._.__._$._.._ _............__.__.__$o_.. -- - - - -$o - I -- $0 - - - -- - -$0 NEEDED Date Date FUNDING SOURCES City funding share source is identified FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 201546 Water service charges $0 $0 ................_.. $340,000 1- $0 $0 L $0 3/23/2001 06/03/2011 ❑ ❑ Mechanism Waterrate model Friday, June 17, 20114:26:53 PM $q ___...__..._.. $0 -- ....:................._........ $0 - -- — $0 $0 . ..... _............ - - -- ... - 1-......... $0 ' _............_._......_......_; ............._._.._.... - --, $0 .. .-- ...-- ..._........--- ........ � L.__.. .........._._.- $0 .__............_ _ _ $0 :._._........ - -- — $0 ! $0 I C_ - -- -- -- - ...................... - – $0 - -- - - __ ............_ _ _ ........................ ........... $0 L L $0 $0 $0 H $0 $0 Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources $0 $0 ! $340,000 �$0 i $0 $0 ' I $340,000 $0 :........... .............. ................. 1.............._... .........._.................... ......__...._. ............_............._.._� L_.._............. ...................._.........1 GAPFUNDING - -- .......__.__...: .._._. _..._........_.._$0 _....._.__... - - -$� -- .._..:-- --- .._.__._$._.._ _............__.__.__$o_.. -- - - - -$o - I -- $0 - - - -- - -$0 NEEDED Date Date City funding share source is identified Commerce Water Line Replacement originally last Unfunded/ PFFP Last printed WA-27� submitted rtiVl5e(1_......_._ nderfunded : project City funding share is committed ❑�/ 3/23/2001 06/03/2011 ❑ ❑ Mechanism Waterrate model Friday, June 17, 20114:26:53 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program. FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No.. CIP No. 2011 Water Meter Installation Project (Water Systems 112011-03. WA -28 Project Location _ Description (Various citywide .. ........... .... _ ..._.. .. Install meters on un- metered City properties and backfiows where needed. Separate school and park irrigation water where shared. "Protect Owner" Implementing In implementing Department Project Manager department's (Public Wks / Comm Svcs '.J. Chung work plan? Project Status: ---- - --------------------- -- - - - - - -- - ---- ------------ -- ---- - - -- - -- - - -- - -- - - IPlans specifications and estimates (PS &E) Justification _.... _...... FundingSources: ty is currently paying for irrigating some school properties since only one meter on -site. Separating the flows will give the City ability to know how to charge iter usage to school district. Water service charges (water utility fund), water capital projects (reserve F ROJECT COST d Construction) Amount unfunded 600,000 $0..._....... Inspection/ CiV1 $0 r..... -� ................. .DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 i Project Costs after $ Contingency $0 I $0 $0 � through 5-yr. CIP t t FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 ' FY 201.3 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Desi n /Engineerin $0 g g 0 $0 ( $0 $0 I $0 $0 Land Costs $0 � --. $0 $0 $0 $0 i $0 I. $0 $0 $0 $0 ;;, $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings 7 $0 j i $0 $0 $0 $0 i� $0 $0 $0 Improvements 7--7-s-oli $300,000 $300,000 € $0 $0 ...... $0 $600,000 $0 Inspection/ CiV1 $0 r..... -� ................. $0 $0 i - $�0 $300,000 ... ............................._. , $ Contingency $0 I $0 $0 � $0 i $0 1 $300,000 $0 i. Other Expenses _ ..................._...- ... $0 I $0 $0 : $0 1 $0 . F $0 ........... . Total Design/ $0 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 I $0 $600,000 $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 ............ FY 2013 -14 .FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Water service charges $0 $300,000 ... ............................._. , - - -- $0 -, $0 i ; $0 $0 ........... . Total Design/ $0 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 I $0 $600,000 $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -14 .FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Water service charges $0 $300,000 ... ............................._. , - - -- $0 -, $0 i ; $0 $0 Water capital projects $0 $0 $300,000 .................................._................................. $0 $0 ..............................: $0 :reserve $0 $O ii l.__.._.. .._.__........._ ............... ! $0 ----- ....- _............_._ $0 0 II ............... ............_._._.__.._........ ..... ----- — $0 . --- ...- --. $0 $0 $0 $0 i $0 I. $0 ....................._ . . $0 $0 . . $0�... i. $0 $0 $0 ................. _ ..... _.__ ..__ ..... _ .................. __._ - -- - Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources $0 $300,000 $300,000 $0 ! $0 $0 $600,000 $0 GAP FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 NEEDED __— Date D Date 2 Project ®escrlptio 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Bruce Avenue & Bridgit Drive Water System Replacement I (Water systems WA -30 Project Location Description — - - - -- p ....... ............._..__._........._. ,Bruce Drive, Bridgit Avenue .____.._...._._..__....._ ................._._._.._.......__._.__._...._......_....._._..._.__............ ......_....._......_._._......_ _. Replacement of water lines on Bruce Avenue and Bridgit Drive. This project is "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing !concurrent with Bruce Avenue & Bridgit Drive Sewer Replacement (sewer main Department Project Manager department's and lower lateral replacement). _.....:.....__._ ................_.. ........_...................... Development Services P. Barnes work plan'? —_ F Project Status: - - -- -------- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - Awaiting CIP approval for project initiation _ ... .. ......... .... - -_. ... Justification FundineSources. If sewer project is undertaken, replacement of water lines ideally would take place concurrently while the street is opened up. This is one of the oldest sections of town and water system rehabilitation should be undertaken as the water assets reach their useful life expectancy. service charges (water utility fund), water meter replacement 2005 CSCDA water revenue bond TOTAL PROJECT COST (.Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $2,000,000 $0 FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013-1:4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION'COSTS ......... $0....:_ Project costs Costs after ........... - -- -- — -- Water meter $0 ! $219,000 l.._.......... - -- - $0 $181,000 through .,yr. CIP ;replacement resv M315411111111IMFY 201.142 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering 167; $200,000 $0 $0 i; $0 $0 $200,000 $0 Land Costs $0 -_... _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .......... .... ..... $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 ' i $0. $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements p.......... $0 $1,200,000 $300,000 0 $0 .. $0 $1,500,000 $0 Inspection / CIVi $150,000 ............. $0 $0 $100 000 .:.... .... .. ...... _$50,000 I $0 $0 l ..._. :..... ......... I. $0 Contingency $0.. .... $100,000.... $....5.....0....,..0.. ..0....0 .... . F—.--...s. '. $0.... $150,000 $0 Other Expenses $0 F--so ... $0 ......$.....0 ... ...... ..$0 . .- .. ........ .. - - -- Total Design/ $t) $1,600,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 ) Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013-1:4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 °Water service charges $0 $1,600,000 ....... ......... $0....:_ .. $0 , �....... $0 ....... $0 ........... - -- -- — -- Water meter $0 ! $219,000 l.._.......... - -- - $0 $181,000 ___ ___ ____ $0 $0 __ _ __ _ $0 ;replacement resv $0 — 2005 water revenue $0 $0 $219,000 $0 $0 bond........ - .......... . ......... ........... _.._ .._._.._ ......... .._..._ _._.__ ........ _ ....... ... i $0 -_... _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .......... .... ..... $0 _._..__._._.._........_.... I .........._ ...$ .. - - -_.. ... ............. $o..- ............ $o i.............. .. .$0 ................................. Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $1,600,000 I Date B $0 - -- $181,000 { i -- ._...._......._._._.. $0 $219,000 l.._.......... - -- - ._ $0 ...... _ ..._._------- $0 I $0 $0J - Total Sources ( $0 $1,600,000 : ............$.....4....0.....0... ,.000 $0 $0 0 I $2,000 000 $0 GAP FUNDING $ ._..... $0 _.. __.....__._.._.- .._ -$. — ...... - -- $0 ;__.._..._ $0 _. _- ...._._..._....._$0- I $0 _ - -- $0 NEEDED ___.___ Date D Date B Project Description 5-Year Capital I mprovement Program FY 11-12 to FY 15-16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Well Rehabilitation Program ter Systems 31 ............ . ........ ... ..................... Project Location Description lCitywide. .... ......................... ............. - ............... ............. ............................. . ....... .................... ............... ........... ............. ......................... ............................... --- ............ ........................... ................. Annual well rehabilitations, including casing, pumps, meters, chlorinators, and .A othe appurtances. "Project Owner" implementing In implementing Department Project Manager department's Public Wks omm Svcs TBD work plan? ❑ Project Status: I . . . .... ............. ........ . . . ....... ------- . .................. . . .... .............................. ....... - - - -- - - - -- - - - - ------------------- - -- - ---- - - - - Not in current work plan. ........... .... - ................... Justification FnndinoSnnrr.Pq-- project is part of water system maintenance and the replacement of aging City service charges TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $400,000 $0 DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through yr. CIP M115-1111IRMFY201.1-12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 1 2015-16 FY 2016 period ❑ Inspection CM F—i—I ............. A�so .................... . ..... [--so ......................... .......... . .... ............... $0 1: ........... --------------- ..... .................... $0 Contingency $0 ... .................. —$0 ........... .................... $0 --so ................. . ........... 0 ......... ------------------- ............................ Other Expenses sp, F $o F-so $0 $o F _. _ ................. so] FUNDING SOURCES FY 2016 FY 2011-12 FY F FY 2013-1.4 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 Water service charges $o F—$o 1� 17---$ol F —sl00000 !1?o,..o $100,000 $400,000 .............. .......... ........................ ........................ ........... .................. $o. . ..... . ....... so F .. �-0-1 ............ $ $6: 1 0 $0 F— —$-0-1 F $0 . . ... . ... . ............ - . .......... J Total Design/ _77 . .. ............. - - --- I �ioo-,666 1 $100,000 i — $**'] 1 $0 11 $100,666 000 1 � 0 Construction ............................... Total Sources F----$70 Funding Funding beyond through FUNDING SOURCES FY 2016 FY 2011-12 FY 201.2-13 FY 2013-1.4 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 Water service charges $o F—$o 1� $100,000 F —sl00000 !1?o,..o $100,000 .. ......... .............. .............. .......... ........................ ........................ ........... ........................................... . ..... . ....... so F .. �-0-1 ............ $ $6: 1 0 1 F $0 . . ... . ... . ............ - . .......... J F $o L ----------- -- - ---------- . .... . .. . ................... $0 . ... . ..... F----s-o--', [--so .................... . .. . . ... . ...... .............. !6 ....... .......... ... .. - .................... C�] .................... . ...... . ................ . . $0 i $0 $0 . . ...... ........................... . . $ 0 ............................. ................. . . .. $0 . . ....... . Total Sources F----$70 Funding Funding beyond through 15-year CIP FY 2016 period $400,000 L ................. - ..... . ............... F----$o-I ........... .............. .............. . ... -- --- ------ - -- - ----------- ------------- $0 I .. �-0-1 ............ $ $6: 1 1 $100..,..0....0. . ..0 .... .F$i00000 $166,666 $100,000 � o' .-I ...... . .. . ........................$ .... o . .... - '- .................................. .......................... . .. .... . GAP FUNDING - $0 $0 ----- - . .... NEEDED . . ............. . ................. ......... —J Date D Date Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant and Hydrant Valve Replacement lwater Systems WA -32 Project Location Description Cit ide. ....._......._ .........................._.............._..:_........_......._...................._.............._..............._........_............._................. ..............._............... Yw Replacement of fire hydrants and valves. .............._......................._....._....._......_........................_........__......... ......................._._...._ "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing Department Project Manager department's (Public Wks / Comm Svcs I TBD work plan? ❑ Project Status: -- ---- _ ----------------- ---------- -- __- -------------------------------- Not in current work plan. Justification ... ._ .ur ._ .._... .._.__. ___..___ . Fundint=_Sources: replacement of City's aging fire protection system. service charges TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $720,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRU Project costs CTION COSTS Costs after through 5 -yr. CIP I i - FY 201.1 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0$0 _.............. . .......... ...., ............... $0 $0 $0 i $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $720,000 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 ;� $0 ! ............. _....._......._.._.__.. ....:_............._.._.._....- $0 ............ ........................ . ....__....................._... $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 F $0 Improvements -- - -- $0 ..._....- - - -- $0 $180 000 $1 $180,000 $180,000 Inspection ! CM (7 $0 $0 $0 $0 !! $0 $0 I.......!^ .....i .. . ... ............... �...... .... ... ..........._I. Contingency $0 $0 ( $o$0 $0 i $0 $0 gi ( J Other Expenses -$0-1 $0 F $0 0 $0 $0 E:77$0 1 $0 $0 $0$0 _.............. . .......... ...., ............... $180,000 ..........._...__....._._::_... $1880,000 i L.................. ............_....._...........! 0$180,000 f............... .............._... $180,000 . .................... ........! $0 $0 $720,000 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ;� $0 ! ............. _....._......._.._.__.. ....:_............._.._.._....- $0 ............ ........................ . ....__....................._... Total Design/ $0 $0 j $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $720,000 $0 Construction I I I .................................. FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Water service charges $0 I.................. $0$0 _.............. . .......... ...., ............... $180,000 ..........._...__....._._::_... $1880,000 i L.................. ............_....._...........! 0$180,000 f............... .............._... $180,000 . .................... ........! I $0 $0 $0 -- ...._.__... $0 ;� $0 ! ............. _....._......._.._.__.. ....:_............._.._.._....- $0 .._._._ ............ ........................ . ....__....................._... - - -..._ ._ -- - -- -- .. - -.:,_ _ .... ..._....- - - -- ................. $o •-- ................. .._ ..._...._._......_......- ..__.. I $o � $0 $0 ; $0 i. $a...., Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources $0 F $0�i $180,000 j $1�80,000�' $180,000 $180,000 $720,000 $0 ............... ...... 1...._. ... .......... NEEDED DING $Q ! .......... ......$� - ----- . ... . $ _0 . $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 — $0 NEEDED --- - -- Date D Date D Project Descrip 5-Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11-12 to FY 15-16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. ;Well and Tank Site Electrical Upgrades Water Systems IWA -33 .......... _ _ __ ....... . ...... ___ ................ . ... ............ . ............... Project Location - Description . Citywide ...... ......... .......... . ......... I .................................................. ............ . ... ........ . .. - ................... ...... . .. ........ . .............. - .................................. ............... .Upgrades of electrical systems at water wells and tanks. ........ "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing Department Project Manager department's ...................... ... . ....... ........ . ... ............................................................ !Public Wks / Comm Svcs work plan? ❑ Project Status: . . ............ --------------- - -- - ----------------------------- - -- - --------------------------------------- ............... ... Not in current work plan. .......... Justification ove reliability of electrical systems to result in improved operational controls, !water service charges monitoring, regulation of water pressure, control of pump energy usage, and nization of well water usage. TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $800,000 $0 .......... .......................... ............ .... ... ................... - DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through I i-yr. CIP FY 2011-12 FY- 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 201.5-16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design/Engineering F--- —$o I City funding share source is identified Well and Tank Site.Electrical originally last ,$o PFFP $0 $o —so submitted revised Land Costs 1 project City funding share is committed ❑ .......... ................ ............. -- 4/7/2011 --- [—v0..... 1 -- ...................... I I I �6 1 I Buildings F - - - - so-] L ---------- -- - - - - J i: i�$o F—$o $0 7---$07 Improvements $0 ............... F -$200,000 .......................... ... .................. $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Inspection / CM — ...... . .. . --.-.-.-.-. ------- $-07—$0 .......... . . ....... ...... . .. .... . ... $o .. .-.....-..... ---- $o-] vo l —...... Contingenev F $0 $0 $o Other Expenses F-- s-0--11—so F—$o $0 i ---$-61 ,F----$61 .... . .... . ......... ................... F--- —$o I City funding share source is identified Well and Tank Site.Electrical originally last Unfunded/ PFFP L ---------------- i Upgrades Last printed !WA-33 submitted revised $800,000 t -- ........... J 1 project City funding share is committed ❑ .......... ................ ............. -- 4/7/2011 --- [—v0..... 1 -- ...................... I I I �6 1 I Friday, June 17, 20114:26:54 PM F----$-o-1 L-- .......... .......... ............... J F - - - - so-] L ---------- -- - - - - J ... . ........ . . .......... . . $200,000 $200, 666 $ Total Design/ Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011-12, FY 2012-1.3 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 Funding Funding beyond through 5-year CIP FY 2016 period 0,000 $200,000] $200,000 Total Sources F ------ $0-� F�$O �: �$20 F -$200,000 $o� ..................... - ......... . . ........... ............... . ............ ...... .... . .................... . ............................................. . ... ----------------------- - GAP FUNDING .....—.....—........ - . - . .- ....... . ..... o .r........ -. — . ---$O—] F. — ....... $0 ..:_.... ......__.._....:.._.._$0....... [--so L $0 NEEDED Date Date 1 City funding share source is identified Well and Tank Site.Electrical originally last Unfunded/ PFFP Upgrades Last printed !WA-33 submitted revised Joderfunded 1 project City funding share is committed ❑ .......... ................ ............. -- 4/7/2011 --- El Mechanism Friday, June 17, 20114:26:54 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Water Service Laterals along East Side Trunk Sewer route Water Systems WA -34 . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Project Location Description Avram, Santa Alicia, Southwest, Snyder .Replacement of water services laterals along the East Side Trunk Sewer route "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing Department Project Manager department's .............._..................:................. ..............._.- ........_.._. _. Public Wks / work Comm Svcs ! TBD Prr`' ❑ 1 a Project Status: _...- - - ...- -- - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- Not in current work plan.- - - Justi ication FundineSources: the streets will be opened up already to install the trunk sewer line, I ;Water service charges ement of the aging water infrastructure at the same time should be lered to reduce impacts to the street from multiple trenching, and to possibly overall construction costs by adding this to a concurrent and co- located TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $400,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP r i - FY 201.1 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 201.3 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 :. $0 $0 $0 i $0 $0 Land Costs � - - -- 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 �0 $ $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $ I $0 Improvements $0 $0 $400 000 ......... _ � ..-� $0 !. $0 $0 Inspection / Civt $0 $0 $0 .. ......_ 1 0 ....... ....1� $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 2 — $0 $0 $0 I $0 �� $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 ....... ........_.... F $0 ........... ........... .................... $o ......$o 1. $0....... � - - -- 0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $400 000 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 I $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -1.3 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $400,000..._.1 L........_ $0 ............................... .............. ................._- $. ..._ ...... � -$0_ ... _ ..._...._$ �..... _.._- ............ _$0— . so _. . ..... $400,000$0 0 $400,000 Total Sources ..... . .... GAP FUNDING ........ . $ - -- - $0 - --- ...._$0 -- - - - -- $0- _.._..._..- $0 -- $0 _- $0 -� $0 NEEDED - - - -- I - - - - -- _. Date D Date C Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Water Distribution System Improvements: Circle Drive :Water service charges $ lWater Systems $0 $0 $ WA -35 $0 Project Location _......_.......__.. _ ................_............. _.._............._......................... ............................... Description .. ......... _.:..._ .. _ .._._.._. Ciro cle Drive _ Replacement of water main and laterals on Circle Drive. F "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing $0 Department Project Manager department's $0 $0 $0 _..__...........__...._.... ._......._..._.... (Development Services ._._..-...._.._.._. _..- ..._ ....................... 1713D work plan? ❑ Buildings F Project Status: - -- - — - ......... ._.... ......... - - - -- -- -- - -- _ . - - - - - -- Not in current work plan Justification ......... .._ -... FundmpSourcec. ......... is one of the older sections of town and water system rehabilitation should be !rtaken as the water assets reach their useful life expectancy. The street is in need of an overlay and /or reconstruction, and this can be accomplished service charges. TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $5,500,000 $0 'DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5 -yr. CIP i t FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -1.5 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering FY 2012 -13 F $0 $0 :Water service charges $ $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $550,000 $0 I I $0 ... ............................... $0 Land Costs F $0 $0 $0 $0. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings F $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 Improvements $0 ... iii $0 _ ............. F $1,512500 $1,512,500 $0—] $0 Inspection/ CM F7777i0 ` $0 $412,500 $412,500 :.; $0 Contingency $0 $0 I._..... ...... -- $550,000 . $550,000 _ . ..... ._ $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 ! $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ ( $0 $0 $3,025,000 $2,475,000 :Construction l— FUNDING SOURCES $550,000 FY 2012 -13 F $0 $0 :Water service charges $ $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $3,025,000 ........ $0 j $0 $825,000 ......................... . ... ............................... $0 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 — $0 ( $5,500,000 I $0 FY 2011 -12 F FY 2012 -13 F FY 201.3 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 F FY 2015 -16 :Water service charges $ $0 $ C , $0 $ $3,025,000 $ $2,475,000 . I $0 $ $0 j $0 ! $ $0 $ $0 $ $0 I $0 $ $0 $0- 0 0 - --- ...--- .$0...._ . .............. ...$0 $0 ;' $ $0 Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $5,500,000 $0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 1---so 7 _... . $0 $0 -.. �. -- -- $o .._.. - -- -. $o $o . id-] Total Sources $q $0._I ..$3,025,.0... 0...0 ........... $2,475,000... ._ $0 $0:... F.s ... $0 GAP FUNDING _$Q —$0 — -- -$o- __........_.._ $_.._ :_, ....... $�... ---- -..._. $� $0 -- — - $0 NEEDED Date Date City funding share source is identified Water Distribution System originally _ ]ast Unfunded / PFFP Improvements: Circle Drive submitted nderfunded project City funding share is committed E] revised_ Last printed WA -35 4/7/2011 11 06/08/2011 ❑ ❑ Mechanism Friday, June 17, 20114:26:54 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Water Tanks 1 & 2 Ladders and Interior Cleaning I lwater System WA -36 ............ Project Location Description......................._...._._............................................................................._............_..................................... ._............................. Tanks 1 and 2 I Replacement of ladders at Tanks 1 and 2 and cleaning of tanks. ............................... .................................. ..................._............................ ....................................._........._......... ..._.........................._ ...... . "Project Owner" Lnplementing In implementing Department Project Manager department's Public. Wks / Comm Svcs HJ. Chung work plan? ❑ Project Status: Scoping Justification ...__.... FundingSout ces: ladder structures are deteriorated and unsafe. service charges TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) r Amount unfunded $100.000 L ........................_......._......._$ 0......... ........._...._................ DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5 -yr. CIP i i - FY 201.1 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 201344 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering F77 $0 $0 Water Tanks 1 & 2 Ladders and $0 $0 $0 $6,000 - $62,000 $0 $0 $0 I ......_$26 000 I $0 Land Costs r $0 7- $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 :. $0 $0 $0 $O $0 $0 i $0 $0 Improvements $0 ! ...... $62,000 $0 _. $0 $0.. -- - $° $�..... Inspection / CM ( L....... $o ...... $o... $0 ..... $26,000 ..._.. $0 . $0 . . _ . .............. i $0 $0 Contingency $0 ...._.. $6,000 ._ .. ....... $0 ._ .... ..... ... . $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 , $0 $0 $0 $6000... $0 $0 Water Tanks 1 & 2 Ladders and $0 $0 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 $0 - $62,000 $0 I. $0 I ......_$26 000 I $p.... $0 i € ........... _ - -- $6,000...... .... -- $0 $0 $0 . Total Design/ $o $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 Construction — ........ .....� Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $10..0 C ........ $ .........1 Total Sources $0 $1�00,000�i $0 .............s.. 0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 ..........._ ............ .....1 _.._. _._ . ._.............. GAP FUNDING F777777j671F $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NEEDED --- - - - -:. - - -. ..... Date Date FUNDING SOURCES City funding share source is identified {] Water Tanks 1 & 2 Ladders and FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Water service charges $0 I. $100,000 ............. ....... . $0 ..... ............ $0 jj $0 1......... ... ........... i...... ........ $0 i € ........... _ - -- - -$� - - - - -- $0 - - - - - - -- ....... . $0 $0 $0 $0 i $0 $0 -_... C- -- - $° - - $° .._..--- ..... - - -............... $0 ;; $0 i - -_ _ - - ° -' $o ...... $o... so Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $10..0 C ........ $ .........1 Total Sources $0 $1�00,000�i $0 .............s.. 0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 ..........._ ............ .....1 _.._. _._ . ._.............. GAP FUNDING F777777j671F $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NEEDED --- - - - -:. - - -. ..... Date Date City funding share source is identified {] Water Tanks 1 & 2 Ladders and originally last Unfunded/ PFFP interior Cleaning Last printed WA -36 submitted revised nderfunded I project City funding share is committed E] ........ - 6/6/2011 ` , 06/06/2011 -, ❑ ❑ , Mechanism t_ Friday, June 17, 20114:26:54 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CI.P No. 'Interceptor Outfall Rehabilitation Wastewater Systems 112011-04 Costs after WW -08 -15 .......................... . ._......._... ........_..... .... _................. .. ......._....................... $0 Project Location Description ......................... _.......... _.. ....... _.................. _......................... ............................... ;West of Rohnert Park to Subregional Treatment Plant :Inspect and rehabilitate 30 year old sewer pipeline between Rohnert Park and......... p p .Santa Rosa Subregional Sewerage Plant on Llano Road. Includes upgrades to ........... _ .......... . ..................... ._.. ...._ ......................... .. "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing pump station. (Also called "Interceptor Outfall - Phase 2 ". in PFFP.) A preliminary Department Project Manager department's ... ....................................:............._......._..._... ..........._._................. IDevelopment Services 1:P. Barnes work plan? engineering study will be needed to determine project scope and alternatives prior $0 to design. Project Status: - - - -- — - - - - - -- Preparation for pre design study. Justification , ..._.... _._ ... FnndinaSnnrep.— parallel sewer pipeline was designed to be used in conjunction with Aitated old pipeline. service charges, Public Facilities Fee TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction). Amount unfunded $6.653.075 $0 Total Design/ $0 $150,000 ( $0 $0 ! $0 $6,5075 $6,653,075 $0 Construction I 03, ................ FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS City funding share source is identified ❑�/ Project costs Costs after FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 through 5-yr. C1P $0 $0 FY 2011 -1.2 FY 2012 -13 FY 201344 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design/Engineering ::, $0 ; 1, $150,000 1 $0 $0 $0 �� $653,210 $803,210 $0 Land Costs - - $0 - - -- $0 �: -- - -.. _. _ ._. ..., $4,770,614 j $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings 0 — - ......_ _... _..... . $0 $0 77i&9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ................. I $0 i . . $0� - -.. $0.. Improvements $ $0_......._..... $0.. $0 $0 $4,588,327..... $4,588,327.. $0....... Inspection / CM $803,210 $0 I l $0 ( $0 ., $0 $0 $0 .... $803,210 ,Contingency g Y $0 $0 ' .......... .... _.......... $0$0 $0 $0 (.. ................. .. $458,328 $458,328 $0 Other Expenses I F_$0, I F-so — $0 $0 — $0 ......_._........ F $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $150,000 ( $0 $0 ! $0 $6,5075 $6,653,075 $0 Construction I 03, ................ Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $1,732,461 $0 ...... ........................... .. .... _ ........................ _ ........ $4,920,614 $0 ....... `...... _.................. $0_� Total Sources $0 $150,000 $o_.__ _ $0 $0 $6,503,075 i $6....,. 6. ...5....3.....,..0....7.....5 $0...._. GAP FUNDING _....... $ - - - -- - - -$� $� - .._._... $� -- $0 ....._.$0 - $0 _- $0 NEEDED _.._ _........._..._. _ Date . Date FUNDING SOURCES City funding share source is identified ❑�/ FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -1.3 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 PFFP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0� ,$1 732 461 ❑ �/❑ Mechanism L — _- - -- ::, . Sewer service $0 $150,000 $0 - - $0 - - -- $0 �: -- - -.. _. _ ._. ..., $4,770,614 j $0 $0 $0 - - ...... -- $0 ....... _ .... .......... $0 - 0 — - ......_ _... _..... . $0 $0 $0 $0 r— $0 $0 ......................... _............................ ......... $0 $0 $0 ................. I $0 i . . $0� - -.. $0.. Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $1,732,461 $0 ...... ........................... .. .... _ ........................ _ ........ $4,920,614 $0 ....... `...... _.................. $0_� Total Sources $0 $150,000 $o_.__ _ $0 $0 $6,503,075 i $6....,. 6. ...5....3.....,..0....7.....5 $0...._. GAP FUNDING _....... $ - - - -- - - -$� $� - .._._... $� -- $0 ....._.$0 - $0 _- $0 NEEDED _.._ _........._..._. _ Date . Date City funding share source is identified ❑�/ Interceptor Outfall Rehabilitation originally, last Unfunded/ PFFP submitted reVlSetl nderfunded project City funding share is committed E] Last printed WW-08 — - - 3/3/2006 �! _ 06/17/2011- , ❑ �/❑ Mechanism L — _- - -- Friday, June 17, 201114:26:54 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -1.2 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. :Sewer Pipeline Replacement (Wastewater Systems WW -10 ................................................. ............................... Project Location _ Description Citywide - -........_....__..__ ............................................_........_................._........................_........_...__..... .......__._..._.._............. . Replacement program of existing sewer pipelines throughout the City, in .............. _ ............... _........._........................_........ ..._.........._...............: "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing accordance with a capital program recommended by the Sewer System ;Management Plan. Department Project Manager department's ................. ............_._._............., ......_._.......... ..._...__......_....._......... Development Services P. Barnes work plan'? Project Status: ---- - --------------- ______ __ _____________... __ ______. ____..__________________...._.. ----- lBruce & Bridgit (WW -20) for 2012-13 phase of ongoing program Justification .... __..... fi FnnAina.Cnnrrnc• Many of existing pipelines in the City's sewer collection system have reached their useful life of 40 -50 years. As part of the Sewer System Management Plan that the City will develop as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, a capital improvements program for the collection system will also be developed, identifying pipelines to be replaced over time. service charges TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $4,800,000 $� Inspection / 'CM $0 DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0. Project costs Costs after Contingency -- $0, $0 $0$0 $0 $0 through 5 -yr. CIP i - FY 201.1-12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 =15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 Land Costs so 1—so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 _ $0 $0 $0 IF-so is $0 $0 $0 Improvements p $0 $0 $0 $1,20 $1,200,000 ...................... IFL $1,200,000 $3,600,000 ......$.... -1,200,000 Inspection / 'CM $0 0 $0. 0 $0 ......... .. $�... Contingency -- $0, $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0�1 Other Expenses r $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 ! $1,200,000 f $1,200,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 ..... _.... $0 ... $O_... $0..... t — $0 $3,600,000 $1* "266,666 .I Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $3,600,000 $1;20...0,..000 ..... ..... ._ ........ ... .. ._. ....... .............. o $o ....... _..._.__.._.._............ 1 . . _ $0 i � .. .. _$. °......... �so- .. ..................... -$o .. Total Sources $0 $0 ! $0 $1,200,000 I $1,200,000 $1,2 0 $3,600 000 $1,200,000 GAP FUNDING —_.... $�I .......... .$.O._.. ----- ..._.. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NEEDED � �� $0 Date D Date S Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. ;Eastside Trunk Sewer - Phase 2 (Main Reach) !Wastewater Systems 112007-02 $0 . i $0 $0 . ......_.. . ........ . ......... WW -11 _ _ .............. ............................................_..... .._........_................... .................. _._..._...... ........_........_._........... Project Location Description _ ......:...................................................................... ........_...................._. _ ............................._..._._._......._................ AvrAve, vA Santa Alicia Ave.,Southwest Blvd to Snyder Ln. ..........._............__..... ;Wastewater main varying from 12-48 " in diameter. Phase 2 route starts at .connection to Phase 1 at Avram Ave., and routes through Santa Alicia Ave., along _ ..........................._.........._..;....... ............................... "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing Southwest Blvd to the intersection at Snyder Lane. Department Project Manager department's ......... Development Servic es P. Barnes work plan? ❑ Protect Status ---- -- - ----- --- ......._.__ ....... - - -- -- - -- — ----- - -- - - - - -- - — -- Designed On hold. C Justification ......... ......... . .................. . .. ....._... FundingSo.urces: s capacity for new development in the Specific Plan and Planned pment areas east of Highway 101, including new connections in the Canon subdivision and some existing development east of Highway 101 Public Facilities Fee / Developer advance, Canon Manor Fee i TOT:A.L, PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $10,789,893 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after ' through 5 -yr. CIP i - FY 201.1 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Inspection / CM $0 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 $0 $1,618,484 $0 . i $0 $0 . ......_.. . ........ . ......... Contingency $0 ............... $0 $2,157,979 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses ......... . $0 1 $0 F_so7l. $0 $0 r $0� $1,078,989 - $0 $0 $5,934,441. $0 $0 $0 $1,618,484 $0 $2,157,979 F $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $38,170 , ! $400,000 $10,351,723 $0 $0 $10,789,893 I $0 Construction $0 -� u FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 PEEP $0 $438,170 ! �....... ....., $9,767,229 ..... ........� $0 i $0 1. — $0 - ...__._...._... - -- — -- - - - - -- o -- :Canon Manor Fees $0 $0 _$58_4_,_4_9__4__ -- ......_._. __._ ...!..... .......... r $0 $0 .. ............. $0 $0 $0 '. �........_ � $0 ... ...._._._._..._._._ $0 $0 i, __ ........ _ . $0 _ .......... . -- -- - t _ ( ............._.......... .......................__._.... ......... ........... _ _....... .. Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $0.. $0...._ Total Sources $0 _$ 438 ,170......:.$10,351,723....... $0 117 ...... ....... _$0 $O..I $10,789,893 GAP FUNDING $38 170 ($38,170) $0 $0 $0 $0 ( — $0 $0 NEEDED . - - �. ---- ..._._........... - - -- . $0 ...._ Date D Date E Project DescrIpt0011 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 1142 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Eastside Trunk Sewer - Phase 2 (South Reach) (Wastewater Systems WW -12 Design /Engineering $0 $188,907 $0 Project Location Description ........... ...... _ ..................... ...... _.............................._ ............_.................. ....................................._._. .......... .................. ... Snyder Lane from Southwest to East Cotati Ave. .Continuation of Phase 2 route, starting from Snyder Lane @ Southwest Blvd. _.........__...--- ......................._._.........._.._................_......___....._....._................_..._._._.......... ............._..__..._._..__... "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing :extending south to the intersection of Snyder Lane RPX @ East Cotati Avenue. Department Project Manager department's ..........._..._.......-.....__......_..__. ..._._......:._._.._ ........... .............._._..._._.. ....- ..._...................... (Development Services P. Barnes work plan? ❑ Project Status: - - .......... .......... - -- ................................ __......__.._..__......... -- - - -- - - -- - - - ... -- - Not in current-work plan Justification ......_ FnndinvRnnrrnc• capacity for new development in the Specific Plan and Planned pment areas east of Highway 101, including new connections in the Canon subdivision and some existing development east of Highway 101 Public Facilities Fee / Developer advance, Canon Manor Fees TOTAL PROJECT COST (.Design and Construction) rr Amount unfunded $1,889,066 I .......................................... $.............................. DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP FY 2016 period ❑ .... Total Design/ $0 $188,907 $1,0,159 $0 1 $0 $o i $1,889,066 $0 Construction 70 FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Public Facilities Fee t t FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Design /Engineering $0 $188,907 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 Land Costs $o $0 $0 $0 I F77 777$,0 I $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 — $0 '; $0 - - $0 ............._.._._................. ..........._..._............... $o $o $o $o ......._ $o F $0 ` ; $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $1,038,986 $0 '........... $0. $0......., Inspection! CIVI F $0 0 $283,360 ... ............. _ ..... . $0 $�.........� Contingency $0 . $0 .. ....,. $377,813 ......... .. $0 ........_... $0 !:......._ $0 Other Expenses $0 $ $0 , $0 is 5-yr. CIP FY 2016 period ❑ .... Total Design/ $0 $188,907 $1,0,159 $0 1 $0 $o i $1,889,066 $0 Construction 70 FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Public Facilities Fee $o $188,907 I ......................... $1,518,288 $0 $0 - ... _.......... $0 ....................... $181,871 $0 li $0 $0 Canon Manor Fee $o $0 $0 $0 $0 _._...:. .... .._..__ $0 $0 - - -- -- - $0 ......... $0 $0 — - $0 — $0 '; $0 - - $0 ............._.._._................. ..........._..._............... $o $o $o $o ......._ $o $o.. Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period $1,707,195 $0 . ..... .. ...... IF $181,871 1 I $0 $ x$0......1 $0 I r_. —$0 �- $0J ..... ..$0 .. Total Sources $0 $188,907 $1,700,159 $0 �� $0 $0 $1,889,066 $0 .1 _..... . ................ l _1 GAP FUNDING ._$Q --- ......... —..$0 _ �. .__._._. $0 ._.... - - - -$0 -. .. $�.._ ._... _._$0 $0 $0 NEEDED Date D Date E Project Description 5-Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11,12 to FY 15-16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. 'Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Program Wastewater Systems WW 15 ............................... Project Location D...... . e..scription . ;Citywide . . .. . ... . .. ....... . . . .. ....................... ... . ........... .... ... ... .A series of projects to reduce rainwater and groundwater infiltration into the sewer system. "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing Department Project Manager department's .. . .......................................................... ........... . . . ........ Public Wks I Comm Svcs 1713D V work plan? Project Status: — ------- ------ — -- .. - Not in current work plan. I_- . ....... .... . ..... ....... ......... . . . . . . ... ....... .......................... . Justification FundinLrSources: -he additional non-wastewater flows from rainwater and groundwater into the ,ewer collection system result in additional operating costs at the City's pumping ;tation and the Subregional Treatment Plant. The additional flow can also ipproach the limits of conveyance capacity in City's sewers and pump station. service charges TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $400,000 $611 . . . . ...... �6 $i66,666 $100 Total Design/ so 1 $100,000 666 s366,666 $ioucio ConstructionI L ............................. - ..................... FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011-12 FY 2012-1.3 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION COSTS Sewer service charges so Project costs Costs after . $100,000 . . $100,000 $100,000 .......... : through FY 2016 5-yr. (JP ❑ I ............ _J1 FY 2011-1.2 FY 201.2-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 201.5-16 period Design/Engineering F $b,� F77777 � $0 ! 7 $0 F 07 10 . . . ....... . ... . ......... E= $0 I $o Land Costs . . . 0 $0 L . ....... L . ........ ... ............ . ... ... ---- ---- - . ... $0 ........... . . . .............. $0 ....... . ...... . .. . ........... ..... . ...... .................. .......... . .............. ... : ......... . ... . ....... . ......... . ........ ............. so $0 F $o $o ............. ...... $o Aso F-$o $0 1---$0 r $o Buildings F777777i671 H $0 $0 1 _$0_1 Improvements F_ F-so .......... ... . . ................... .......... F-$o ........ . .............................. _V-00—,000 .............. ................ F__$1o_,000o ...................... ...................... F_$_30_0_,o_oo_1 ........................................... F $100,000 -- ...... . .................... ................ Inspection CM [ ------------------------ F F_$0 ............ ..H .......... ...... $0.. $0 ................. ------------------------- so . . ...... .............. F -------- ------ ------- Contingency F----] 117 ......... ..... --$o .......... . ............ F - ....................... $0 ............ F ....... ....... ... Other Expenses $ 0 $0 $0 $0 F i IL ----------------------- $611 . . . . ...... �6 $i66,666 $100 Total Design/ so 1 $100,000 666 s366,666 $ioucio ConstructionI L ............................. - ..................... FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011-12 FY 2012-1.3 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 Sewer service charges so . $100,000 . . $100,000 $100,000 .......... : I ............ _J1 ................................ - 7-7-7- o . .... $0 0 F 07 10 . . . ....... . ... . ......... E= [7:7�1 $o ................................ .......................... . . . 0 $0 L . ....... L . ........ ... ............ . ... ... ---- ---- - . ... $0 ........... . . . .............. $0 ....... . ...... . .. . ........... ..... . ...... .................. .......... . .............. ... : ......... . ... . ....... . ......... . ........ ............. so $0 .. ... .. . .. .. . ........... ........... . $o .... ... ............................. $0 ............. ...... $o Funding Funding beyond through 5-year CIP FY 2016 period [_7 �O000 $0 $100,00 000 F $300,000 Total Sources F -sl00000 1 0 ........ . ..... . . ............................ ....... . ........ .................. ...................... .... .. ........................ .... . ....... ........... ...................... . . . . ....... . GAP FUNDING F7777iFl L ........... . $6_1 F-$. o . . ........ . .. . ........ . .. . ....$0 .... . ... ...... . .s.o . NEEDED Date D Date I Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Bruce Avenue & Bridgit Drive Sewer Replacement Description _...... ......... ..... . ......... .... ... Replace collection system main and lower laterals on Bruce Avenue and Bridgit Drive Justification Category Project No. CIP No. iWastewater Systems WW-20 Project Location Bruce Avenue "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing Department Project Manager department's (Development Services P. Barnes _— work plan'? O Project Status: Awaiting CIP approval for project in is one of the oldest areas of Rohnert Park and experiences high inflow & tration of groundwater and stormwater. This extra water leaking into the sewer tem increases the City's sewer treatment costs. This project would begin acing the sewer collection system infrastructure (which has reached its useful expectancy), as well as reduce sewer treatment costs. !Sewer service charges (sewer utility fund), 2005 sewer revenue ibond TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded rr $3,200,000 L ............. . ......................$........ . $0 , DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS 200 000 0 $0 i t FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Design /Engineering $0 ; $320,000 $0 0 $0 $0 Land Costs itiation Fundin::Sources: $0 is one of the oldest areas of Rohnert Park and experiences high inflow & tration of groundwater and stormwater. This extra water leaking into the sewer tem increases the City's sewer treatment costs. This project would begin acing the sewer collection system infrastructure (which has reached its useful expectancy), as well as reduce sewer treatment costs. !Sewer service charges (sewer utility fund), 2005 sewer revenue ibond TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded rr $3,200,000 L ............. . ......................$........ . Inspection/ CIVi $0 , DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS 200 000 0 $0 i t FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Design /Engineering $0 ; $320,000 $0 0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 r 480,000 � $0 $0 $0 $0 , $0 $0� Buildings $ $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements p $0 $960,000 .......... _........ $800 000 $0 ................................ $0 $0 Inspection/ CIVi $0 , ..... 00 200 000 0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $340 000 ..._ .... ..... .............. $300,000 $0 $0 l $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $1,900,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 201.2 -1.3 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP FY 2016 period ❑ $320,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,760,000 $0 480,000 � $0 $640,000 $0 $0 1, 7---s-o-] $3,200,000 I $0 Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources $0 $1,900,000..... $1, 300, 000 ...... ........._............._._..,. $0..__.I ._._...._........._.._....._.__$ 0. ...... ...... . ..... ......._........_$0 ! 1 1.._$3,200,000.._. GAP FUNDING NEEDED _ '_ $ -- - - -$0- - -- - -..._ $0 -... -- $0 - - - --- -so-..1 __... - ._...._..._$0 ... - - -- $0 $0 Date D Date B Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program FY 11 -12 to FY 15 -16 ProjectName Category Project No. CIP No. Replacement of Sewer Pipe Under Hwy 101 @ RPX overcrossing (Wastewater Systems WW -21 ......................................._.............. ........................... -1 -. ................ ..........._.......................... .................. ............ .................._...._.._..._ Project Location Description Under Hwy 101 at Rohnert Park Expressway overcrossing - .._.... _.__.... ... .... .._...... Jack and bore under Hwy. 101 at approximately the location of the Rohnert Park Expressway Overcrossing (aka "Don Claussen Overcrossing") to install new line "Project Owner" Implementing In implementing :E and abandon existing line. Department Project Manager department's g....................................... ..............................i ..........._...................... ......................_........ work plan? iPublic Wks / Comm Svcs 1P. Barnes p ❑ Project Status: - -- - -- Awaiting approval and adoption of CIP prior to project initiation. Justification .......... FundlnsSources: Reduce maintenance costs and prevent pipe failure at this section of pipe, which has developed a "belly" due to pressure on pipe. service charges. TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $1;500,000 $0 .DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project costs Costs after through 5-yr. CIP i FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 period ❑ Design /Engineering Date , R $0 .............. .. $0...... $0 $0 $0 $0 'f $0 $0 r $0 : $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I F $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 j $0 $0 Improvements $0 i.... .... r---so ......... $0 ...... _ ............ $0 $0 $1,500,000 Inspection / CM $Q $0....... $0 $0 $0 $0....... Contingency _. '. $0 $.0.._._ $0 .._ $D $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 1-so $0 $ $0 $0$0 $0 Date , R $0 .............. .. $0...... $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 .- ........................... _ ... . Date , R $0 .............. .. $0...... $0 .... $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $0 Construction I I FUNDING SOURCES FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -1.4 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 46 Funding Funding beyond through 5 -year CIP FY 2016 period Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $1,5 000 00 $1,500,000 $0 0 [ ....... ..I . 1 .... [ .... l F GAP FUNDING - $0- -- - -- $0 - - - -- —$o -- .._...._..- ...... $0 ...........- -. $� - .....- - - -$0 -----so-F----s-6 NEEDED Date. D Date , R 1 z�? f>. �uxxe• ��x< s:.. �: ��. iz' a�ez' a��.,a..�.tu°n�`��`��,�.<;;:�C' "`.....�:. w..,.��..�a�i7 •�.�z�,,,��* ,;�!"�.'��d�.�...,. �.rc�a�%��'a:�;�. ,F�a3x7F�.�lt".'f�"�' €& z•'�3 SECTION Z FUNDED PROJECTS BEYOND 5 -YEAR CIP and PARTIALLY- FUNDED PROJECTS FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET (FY 2011 -12 through 2015 -16) PROJECTS BEYOND 5 -YEAR CIP and PARTIALLY - FUNDED PROJECTS CIP # Project Title Description Funding Sources Project Cost Project Status , - - � i s s. _._.,. :'t ., .,. <.... m di'. 1..2 a,<. i, 3. . � �' •S sn <.. . <...,. . ..has `i ......,1 �' ;.x,.. i i z L s' 8. . , o.. . h . .. .....< . . -�.� , ..,. . , h Prepared for 6128111 Rohnert Park City Cound meetng FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET (FY 2011 -12 through 2015 -16) PROJECTS BEYOND 5 -YEAR CIP and PARTIALLY - FUNDED PROJECTS CIP # Project Title Description Funding Sources Project Cost Project Status Prepared for 828111 Rohnert Park City Council meefing This project is for the reconstruction and improvement of Keiser Avenue between Snyder Lane and Petaluma Hill Road. The TR -35 Keiser Avenue Improvements new road includes two travel lanes, a Class II bike lane on both Public Facilities Fee $7,242,430 Not in current work plan sides, 2 traffic signals (Petaluma Hill Rd and Snyder Ln), sidewalks and landscaping. This project is for the extension of Bodway between Valley House Drive and Railroad Avenue. The extension will include TR -49 Bodway Parkway Extension two travel lanes, a Class II bikeway on both sides of the street, Public Facilities Fee $2,230,298 Not in current work plan sidewalks and a landscape strip. Environmental mitigation is included in "Other Expenses" in design /construction costs below. This project is for the extension of Bodway between Valley Intersection Improvements - Commerce House Drive and Railroad Avenue. The extension will include TR -83 Blvd. @State Farm Drive two travel lanes, a Class II bikeway on both sides of the street, Public Facitiiies Fee $537,700 Not in current work plan. sidewalks and a landscape. strip. Environmental mitigation is included. TR -84 Intersection Improvements - Commerce Blvd @ Southwest Blvd Add new signal. Public Facilities Fee $543,200 Not in current work plan. TR -85 Intersection Improvements - Labath Ave @ Restripe 2 northbound lanes and 4 southbound lanes and Public Facilities Fee $212,000 Not in current work plan. Rohnert Park Expwy reprogram signal. TR -86 Intersection Improvements - Redwood Dr @ Rohnert Park Expwy Restripe northbound lanes and modify signal Public Facilities Fee $207,400 Not in current work plan. TR -87 Intersection Improvements - US 101 NB ramps @ Golf Course /Commerce Restripe nouthbound through lane to shared through /right/left. Public Facilities Fee $173,000 Not in current work plan. TR -88 Intersection Improvements - US 101 SB ramps @Wilfred /Redwood Restripe southbound through lane to shared through / right/left. Public Facilities Fee $173,000 Not in current work plan. WATER:SYSTEM "3x l: ��. M1 is .. WA -16 Water Model Stud Update Study p Confirm water demand projections and update model as Water service charges 9 $150,000 Not in current work plan necessary. Prepared for 828111 Rohnert Park City Council meefing FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET (FY 2011 -12 through 2015 -16) PROJECTS BEYOND 5 -YEAR CIP and PARTIALLY- FUNDED PROJECTS CIP # Project Title Description Funding Sources Project Cost Project Status Prepared for 628111 Rohnert Park Co Cound meeUnp Construction of water storage tank located east of Petaluma Hill WA -26 Water Storage Tank #8 Road to include water tank, 12 -inch and 16 -inch water Developer $4,600,000 In design (by developer). Not transmission mains, a 16 -inch recycled water main, and an in current work plan. access road. S.T 0 .,... �..� .. , , ,.... ... ,. WW -16 Wastewater Pump Station Pony Pump Installation of pump to specifically designed to handle low sewer Sewer service ce charges $399,000 Not in current work plan. conditions Phase 3 of the Eastside Trunk Sewer extends from the intersection of Snyder Lane and Southwest Blvd north along WW -17 Eastside Trunk Sewer - Phase 3 Snyder Lane to its intersection with Rohnert Park Expressway. Public Facilities Fee $2,851,095 Not in current work plan Phase 3 includes approximately 2,000 feet of 24 -inch diameter gravity sewer. Prepared for 628111 Rohnert Park Co Cound meeUnp �.f�'?.�v�s�_�" u.,< �, �� .�"'��,��:.,��^i��z��i�."��a >, ai.�� ...., �< „z��Ps�`��s��".��:/;✓��,� Via. �. �1� SECTION 3 UNFUNDED PROJECTS FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET (FY 2011 -12 through 2015 -16) UNFUNDED PROJECTS CIP # Project Title Description Justification Funding Status Project Cost Project Status pA,`..:.> ��. , A; �., �r '<. -- 1;„ ,. , of ... >. - _ .... ... � � "\ �,,..p �... 2 � s. „it's �£ \k'"� c, v J '� � �'. �.. �� zc.. f. -: «: - n, L... ? %l R ?. S ... „ i. ...��1._ .. ._��.,:a ':,e,�tv rS',., .::: -..o.. ... x' -.. e� as,...'. \'wia .\ _..... .. .. +ui�:.. \ v..�.y ,. >. ... .. > f. '3 F�T� vxu�?� ..... _:� ..... Type 1 Fire Truck for west side yp ( Fire truck for West Side Public Safe Facility Safety ty is Increased call demand, reduce response times to high risk Unfunded. $350,000 in funding EQ -03 public safety facility) needed facilities, provide response to major economic revenue sources identified in FIGR MOU. $750,000 Unfunded for city • • T1(� ..; ...,<.s.. Ll .. a;. CGi�s .<. \,.. .. I.. `�'\ r.. �• \r �°" ,„ b .. 'i .�;.. ins - 5. d-z e ... .. - ua . � Y.. �':-:.•.s / e✓ r \ ., 1 < : X ..... .�..f ...., ..,,.. h .�— ..,..,.5, <, ^..�w\- YAcx .� .,✓i, "6':P ,:.r r'.. w a3. •;'.,.: ..?. .��<. Public Works Corporation Yard Regular repair and replacement of corporation yard, Corporation yard asphalt is in desperate need of attention, repairs Unfunded. Possible funding sources OF -30 Asphalt Repair parking lot and driveway asphalt must be made to prevent further damage to base rock and to include water and sewer operations. $261,500 Unfunded provide a safe working environment for employees Built in 1972, the Northern Fire Station has undergone two minor Complete interior remodel and installation of fire interior upgrades over the past 20 years. The building currently OF -34 Northern Fire Station Interior protection sprinkler system to bring building up to has no fire sprinkler protection. The remodel will include Unfunded $500,000 Unfunded Upgrade code. installation of upgrades including skylights, energy efficient appliances and other solutions to increase energy efficiency. The roof of structure will also need to be replaced. Design and implementation, including installation, of The City's parks and recreational facilities lack basic identification a signage and wayfinding program to provide design signs. Entrances and access to the bike and walking path Redevelopment. (Partial Citywide Wa indin & Si na a tYwi Yf 9 9 9 identity, consistency, clear directional communication b Y network, including creekside paths, is not clearly marked. implementation mentioned as Not included in work OF-41 Program for points o interest in Rohnert Park, including park Directional signs to the City's destinations and points -of- interest possible project within Corridor $200,000 plan. i locations, bike and walking paths, and other local and are few, haphazard, and have no consistent and unified design. Improvements project in FY 2010 -14 regional destinations in the City. A signage and wayfinding program would address these issues CDC 5 -year plan.) and shape the community image of Rohnert Park. Annual program to prioritize and replace segments of Address potential liability risks and ADA issues due to sidewalks OF43 Sidewalk Rehabilitation Program damaged sidewalk badly damaged by tree root upheaval; cracking due to weather, Unfunded. $500,000 Unfunded. soil expansion and tree roots; and past faulty repair. Compliance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit requires that municipal OF-45 Corp Yard Shop Runoff Interceptor Design and installation of drainage structure to divert operations be conducted as to minimize water quality impacts to Unfunded $80,000 Not in current work potential runoff from City shops into sewer system. local creeks. Runoff containing potential hazardous constituents plan from the City's automotive and mechanical shops must be redirected to prevent non - compliance with the NPDES. Prepared lu MW Rohn Perk C]yC Wl meal], FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET (FY 2011 -12 through 2015 -16) UNFUNDED PROJECTS CIP # Project Title Description Justification Funding Status Project Cost Project Status Pr ,,Wf,,W II Rohned Pn CtlyC,u l—IM Replace current above - ground fuel storage tanks at Improve fuel tank security and accurate and reliable gauging for OF-46 Above - Ground Tanks (Corp Yard Corporation Yard and Public Safety North, to include better fuel management. Provide improved environmental Unfunded $82,500 Not in current work and Public Safety North) pad, enclosure, tanks, gauges, pumps and electrical. l protection and compliance with better spill containment and fill plan This will install a new parallel controls system to run the chillers, Safety Public Safe Main - HVAC Controls New main controller, new wiring, new programming boilers, air handling units concurringly with the existing HVAC Not in current work OF -51 Phase 1 including design and engineering. This estimate controls system. The 46 subzones will be switched over to the Unfunded $53,000 reflects using the $25,000 grant funding in this phase. new system one at a time as each subzone controller fails. plan Design and engineering will be done in this phase. OF -52 Public Safety Main - Exterior Roof parapet wall exterior coating, window seal This will fix the leaks around the windows & washing the exterior Unfunded $53,200 Not in current work Coating (Phase 1) replacement, & exterior washing (EIFS) stucco should make the building look newer. plan OF -53 Public Safety Main - Roof Replace entire roof. Preservation of existing asset. Unfunded $145,000 Not in current work plan OF -54 Public Safety Main - Chiller Replacement Replace chillers. Preservation of existing asset Unfunded $170,000 Not in current work plan P OF -55 Public Safety Main - Exterior Coating (Phase 2) New coating on building exterior. Preservation of existing asset. Unfunded $75,000 Not in current work plan Because the existing subzone controllers are being discontinued Public Safety Main - HVAC Controls Replace new subzone controller to the new control but still have life, we can replace them as each fail. The new P Not in current work OF -56 subzone controllers will be tied into the new HVAC controls Phase 2 system as each fails over several years. Unfunded $71,000 plan system. We anticipate completely phasing out the old system over a 5 year period. : S t�D [[ y 3... Z -: '� 2 lsn 5. h -.. ✓. -. :'- � Ew.....eow.'.a.��. ... ...... : >S c. . .... \e... e, v'..�.x.:: .. ...o._'Ta: e.. s:..._..♦ v. ......; ...._...:__ ...,.._..:. s`. ',. � � ..?_. .Ai' ..,r ... .. .,........ z,:.i .. ...: .,,r.. � .. .x.� v , .. �. ,.., Numerous customer complaints and staff concerns over the PR -06 Sports Center Air Conditioning Replace air conditioning system for the Center. years indicates a need to install this system. The interior P g y Unfunded $570,000 Not in current work System temperature of this uncooled facility can reach 85 -90 degrees and plan could be unsafe for use. 15,000 square -foot facility skateboard park with PR -21 Skateboard Park - Permanent concrete surfaces, ramps and other street - course Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan Unfunded $2,000,000 Not in current work features; fencing, signage, security lighting and (April 2008), 6 -year Capital Improvements Plan. plan irrigation. Installation of ramps, paths and other site PR-47 ADA Improvements to Parks improvements at and around playgrounds to address Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act Unfunded $145,000 Not in current work path -of- travel issues plan Pr ,,Wf,,W II Rohned Pn CtlyC,u l—IM FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET (FY 2011 -12 through 2015 -16) UNFUNDED PROJECTS CIP # Project Title Description Justification Funding Status Project Cost Project Status P,p-11, W &11 R,h.,d ftM City C,u lmp H" The exterior paint is cracking and peeling. The underlying wood PR -51 Callinan Sports & Fitness Center Repainting of building exterior and locker rooms is decaying due to the lack of paint protection. The interior of the Unfunded $180,000 Not in current work Painting locker rooms has had numerous patches and is in need of plan repainting. Existing equipment is worn and inefficient. Repairs and PR -52 Community Center HVAC Removal and replacement of old HVAC equipment maintenance costs are beginning to exceed the value of the Unfunded $55,000 Not in current work Replacement equipment. New equipment will be more energy efficient and plan. reduce operating costs. The enclosure that contains the Community Center's mechanical systems is damaged and has existing leaks. Water collects in PR -53 Community Center Mechanical Re -roof the mechanical systems enclosure located this enclosure, which is located directly above the new restrooms Unfunded $74,000 Not in current work Enclosure Re -Roof on the Community Center roof. constructed with the Community Center ADA Improvements and plan Truss Repair Project. Continued leakage may damage the new improvements. Existing equipment is worn and inefficient. Repairs and PR -54 Boiler Replacement - Sports Center Replacement of boiler in sports center maintenance costs are beginning to exceed the value of the Unfunded $65,000 Not in current work equipment. New equipment will be more energy efficient and plan reduce operating costs. PR -56 Playground Replacement Program Annual program of replacing playground equipment, p g g p yg Regular replacement of playground equipment is necessary to comply with playground safety standards and ADA, as well as Unfunded $672,000 Not in current work including fall material. . reduce liability. plan PR -57 Passive Turf Area 250' by 500' field providing space for citywide special events, festivals, multiple sports and adjacent areas Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan. Unfunded $840,000 Not in current work for passive recreation, picnicking and socilaizing. (April 2008), 6 -year Capital Improvements Plan. plan PR -58 Dog Park 2 -acre dog park with turf dog run (separate areas for small and large dogs); agility course for dogs; Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan Unfunded $600,000 Not in current work drinking fountains; bench seating. p rovements Plan. (Ap ril 2008 )' y Capital Improvements 6-year Ca plan Large group picnic areas would feature benches, a PR -59 Group Picnic Areas grill, sink and serving table and would seat 60. Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan Unfunded $336,000 Not in current work (Estimated cost of $168,000 for each large picnic (April 2008), 6 -year Capital Improvements Plan. plan area.) Skate features begin at approximately $15,000 and PR -60 Skate Features can run up to $120,000 depending on the size, Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan Unfunded $120,000 Not in current work amount and variety of features such as grind rails, (April 2008), 6 -year Capital Improvements Plan. plan benches and ramps. PR -61 ADA Transition Plan Update Plan to identify physical changes required to make Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan Unfunded $75,000 Not in current work programs and facilities accessible. (April 2008), 6 -year Capital Improvements Plan. plan P,p-11, W &11 R,h.,d ftM City C,u lmp H" FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET (FY 2011 -12 through 2015 -16) UNFUNDED PROJECTS CIP # Project Title Description Justification Funding Status Project Cost Project Status Preps faM &11 Rohn Peh CityC mlm io The city's Aquatics Master Plan of 1999 listed this project as a high priority. The pool would attract more memberships to the Sports Center Renovation &Indoor Sports Center Renovation including 75' x 30' Center and create a better family atmosphere to attract and retain Not in current work PR -62 Swimming Facility recreational lap pool with four shallow lanes. members. Year -round swimming is recommended for optimum Unfunded $6,000,000 plan health, and is particularly feasible for older people, whose numbers are growing rapidly. Also identified in Parks & Recreation Facilities Master Plan (April 2008). PR Park Paths and Parking Lot Asphalt -paved paths in parks as well as parking lots Eliminate trip hazards and address access and ADA compliance -64 Overlays for neighborhood parks are in need of overlays. issues where possible. Unfunded $500,000 Unfunded Community Development Block Grant Install sidewalk access ramps in locations where (CDBG). Unfunded after FY 11 -12. Ramp upgrade to be TR -19 Sidewalk Access Ramps none are present and to retrofit existing locations to Sonoma County Grand Jury mandate. Possible sources include $947,500 included in 2012 comply with the Americans with Disabilties Act. Redevelopment, Measure M, Gas streets projects Tax. ,... zSF `K ✓ 7. y, �'. .,. � ..... :.r -::- .., ..a -.v ,m. �.... w.,. ...... r, c _.. .�. S.TT! r_. ....i S�.x`i: ✓>�.> 4 `1 Community Development Block Grant Install sidewalk access ramps in locations where (CDBG). Unfunded after FY 11 -12. Ramp upgrade to be TR -19 Sidewalk Access Ramps none are present and to retrofit existing locations to Sonoma County Grand Jury mandate. Possible sources include $947,500 included in 2012 comply with the Americans with Disabilties Act. Redevelopment, Measure M, Gas streets projects Tax. Unfunded. Possible funding sources TR -22 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Install traffic calming devices at various locations This project responds to citizen complaints abuot disruptive, include Traffic Safety Fund, Not in current work Program throughout the City. problematic, or dangerous traffic conditions in neighborhoods Redevelopment, Measure M, Gas $2,850,000 plan Tax. Rohnert Park Expressway Median Modification of the existing median opening to Intensified development on the south side of Rohnert Park Unfunded. Possible funding sources include Traffic Safety Fund, Not in current work TR -33 Modifications provide left -turn movement(s) from RPX on the Expressway West at the 300 -400 block may warrant Redevelopment, Measure M, Gas $63,600 plan modifications to the median to improve turning and stacking Tax. The City's Bike Master Plan and General Plan show a Class III route through Holly and Fauna Avenues, crossing over the Bike / pedestrian.bridge connecting the western Wilfred Channel Extension, but there is no "official" crossing Unfunded. Possible funding sources TR -67 Holly -Fauna Bike Bridge terminus of Holly Avenue and eastern terminus of here. Pedestrians and cyclists must either wade through the include: Transportation Development $190,000 Not in current work Fauna Avenue at the Wilfred Channel Extension creek or travel south to cross at the golf course, where the Act (TDA) fund plan channel goes underground. A bike /ped bridge would enable a safe crossing of the creek and connect the two Class III routes on Holly and Fauna Avenues. Preps faM &11 Rohn Peh CityC mlm io SECTION 4 /_1 > >:4:111K PC RESOLUTION NO. 2011-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE DRAFT FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FY 2012 -2016 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ROHNERT PARK GENERAL PLAN 2000 WHEREAS, on July 25, 2000 the City Council approved Resolution No. 2000 -152 adopting a comprehensive update of the City's General Plan which included specific policies and objectives for infrastructure, construction and maintenance of public facilities; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is appointed by the City Council as the Planning Agency for the City of Rohnert Park and is required by State law to review and rind that all proposed projects included in the Capital Improvement Program (GIP) are consistent with the adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the- Project manager has determined that finding the Capital Improvement Program in conformance with the General Plan is not a project pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, and additionally, since this is consistency finding, the previous environmental documentation for the General Plan is adequate CEQA documentation; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2011, the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Application No. 131,2011 -021 CIP, the draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Program. Budget Fiscal Years 2009 -2014, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the project; and, WHEREAS, at the May 26, 2011, Planning Commission meeting, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all the facts relating to Planning Application No. P1,2011 -021 CIP, the draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Budget Fiscal Years 2012 -2016. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DOES RESOLVE: that the Planning Commission of the City of Rohnert Park does hereby find that the proposed draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Budget Fiscal Years 2012 -2016, as attached and incorporated herein, is consistent with the adopted City of Rohnert Park Comprehensive General Plan and incorporates all information and comment provided at its May 26, 2011 public meeting as part of its finding, including the staff report. NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby report to the City Council that the draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Budget Fiscal Years 2012 -2016, Planning Application No. P1,2011 -021 CIP is consistent with the Rohnert Park General Plan 2000. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 26th day of May, 2011 by the City of Rohnert Park Platmin2 Commission bAthe following vote: I DavidWrmstrong, Chairperson, RohnerVPark Planning Commission Attest: S�san Azevedo, S etary AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ADAMS ARMSTRONG �+ BORB.A.j+6+'tGIUDICE T I- AYDON A 6,1" k RESOLUTION NO. 2011-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ADOPTING THE FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2011 -12 THROUGH 2015 -16 AND APPROVING PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2011 -12 WHEREAS, the City's Capital Improvement Program Committee, made up of various City departments, has assembled a slate of proposed capital improvement projects and associated costs covering the period between Fiscal Year 2011 -12 and Fiscal Year 2015 -16; WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park's General Plan 2000 requires that a Capital Improvement Program be in place as a planning and budgeting tool for the improvement of City facilities and infrastructure, to be reviewed and updated annually; WHEREAS, this project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to the California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15306 (Class 6 — Information Collection); WHEREAS, City staff and the Rohnert Park Planning Commission have reviewed the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2011 -12 through 2015 -16 and recommend its adoption; WHEREAS, on June 14, 2011, the City Council reviewed and discussed the draft Five - Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2011 -12 through 2015 -16 and recommended revisions; and WHEREAS, on June 28, 2011, the City Council reviewed the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2011 -12 through 2015 -16 with recommended revisions. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park does hereby authorize and adopt the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2011 -12 through 2015 -16 and approve projects for FY 2011 -12. DULY AND REGULARY ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park this 28th day of June, 2011. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk