2012/05/22 City Council Resolution 2012-48RESOLUTION NO. 2012- 48
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AND
BANEY CORPORATION DBA OXFORD SUITES AND INNS
WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park ( "City ") has received a request for a Conditional
Use Permit and a Development Area Plan for the North Village of the Wilfred Dowdell Specific
Plan;
WHEREAS, the North Village of the Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan includes the Oxford
Hotel and Suites and McDonald's Restaurant Project; and
WHEREAS, Baney Corporation dba Oxford Suites and Inns has agreed to fund the
City's efforts in processing their application, including future documents and legal costs as may
be required for project approval.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the City Manager is
hereby authorized and directed to execute a Reimbursement Agreement with Baney Corporation
in a form substantially similar to that attached, for and on behalf of the City, including
authorization for staff to make minor adjustments to this agreement with City Attorney review
and approval.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 22 "6 day of May, 2012, by the City
Council of the City of Rohnert Park.
ATTEST:
Interim Deputy City Clerk
111911111 11111 RNMIERWIT461",
Ma r
AIIANOTU: AYE BELFORTE: AYE CALLINAN: AYE STAFFORD: AYE MACKENZIE: AYE
AYES: ( 5 ) NOES: ( 0 ) ABSENT: ( 0 ) ABSTAIN: ( 0 )
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made and entered into as of the _ day
of , 2012, by and among the CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ( "City "), a municipal corporation, and
BANEY CORPORATION ( "Developer "), an Oregon corporation.
RECITALS
A. Developer has submitted or plans to submit an application for development of Oxford Suites Hotel
and McDonald's Restaurant ( "Proposed Project ") in Rohnert Park, California. Development of the
Proposed Project requires or contemplates the following approvals, documents and processing
activities (collectively, "Project Approvals ") -
(1) Preparation and adoption of Development Area Plan;
(2) Approval of permits or waivers from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, North Coast Regional
Water Quality Control Board, California Department of Fish and Game;
(3) Tentative Map, Final Map, Parcel Map, lot line merger and /or adjustment, as needed to
create developable parcels;
(4) Recordation of easements /dedications for widening streets and installation of utilities;
(5) Reciprocal access between Home Depot and Village North;
(6) Site specific Hydrology and Drainage study, NPDES General Permit for Stormwater Runoff,
and approval of storm drainage plans by the Sonoma County Water Agency and the City of
Rohnert Park;
(7) Site Plan and Architectural Review;
(8) Grading permits, building permits, transportation permit from appropriate agencies (e.g.
Caltrans, Sonoma County Public Works Department, City) for approval of construction
haul route;
(9) Mitigation monitoring program;
(10) Real estate transaction agreement;
(11) Fee credit reimbursement agreement;
(12) Any other approvals, documents, or processing reasonably necessary to develop the
Proposed Project.
B. Prior to the execution of this Agreement, City and Developer had an Informal Reimbursement
Agreement ( "IRA ") pursuant to which City has been processing the Proposed Project and billing
Developer for costs incurred therewith. Pursuant to the IRA, Developer has previously deposited
1
with City $96,833.12 to serve as a deposit for City's costs incurred in processing the Proposed
Project. As of April 30, 2012, the City has incurred $73,596.62 in such costs. As of April 30, 2012,
Developer has a balance of $22,936.50 remaining, pursuant to the IRA. The City has made a good
faith estimate to summarize all such fees and costs in the exhibit attached to this Agreement as
ATTAC H M E NT A.
C. Continued processing of the Proposed Project and processing of the Project Approvals will require
City to incur various costs and expenses including staff processing, consultant costs, and legal fees
and costs.
D. in order to facilitate processing of the Project, Developer desires to reimburse City for all of its costs
in connection with the Project Approvals, including but not limited to: legal fees, staff time and
consultant costs incurred in connection with the Project Approvals; costs unbilled and
unreimbursed by developer in connection with Project Approvals covered by this Reimbursement
Agreement; and any litigation costs incurred as a result of the processing of the Proposed Project,
approval of any Project permits, real estate transaction agreement or fee credit reimbursement
agreement.
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the foregoing recitals and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties
hereby agree as follows:
1. Purpose of Agreement. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for payment by Developer of all
legal, staff and consultant costs directly or indirectly incurred by City in connection with the Project,
including legal defense costs, if any. Additionally, the purpose of this Agreement is to bring current
all outstanding amounts subject to reimbursement.
2. Developer Reimbursement Obligation. Developer shall reimburse City for the following costs
(collectively, "Eligible Costs ") incurred in connection with the Project (including any and all staff and
or legal costs incurred following approval of the Proposed Project to process the project to
completion):
a. City staff time, processing costs, consultant costs (including, but not limited to, wetlands
specialists, biologists, landscape architects and other consultants required to review plans
and /or designs, mitigation monitoring compliance, permitting as may be required but not
limited to outside agencies and districts) and legal fees associated with processing all Project
applications, implementing any Project Approvals, including legal fees and costs incurred in
connection with the legal defense of any Project Approvals;
b. legal fees and costs payable to City's counsel in connection with the negotiation, drafting,
implementation and defense of the proposed real estate transaction agreement and fee
credit reimbursement agreement;
2
c. a 7% administrative fee charged on costs of outside consultants and legal services which are
included in subsections a and b above;
d. fees and costs which, as of April 30, 2012, City has incurred but which have either not yet
been billed for reimbursement or which have not yet been reimbursed to the City. The City
has made a good faith estimate to summarize all such fees and costs in the exhibit attached
to this Agreement as ATTACHMENT A. The parties acknowledge that the figures on
ATTACHMENT A constitute the City's good faith effort to summarize all such fees and costs,
and Developer agrees that fees or costs which have inadvertently been omitted from
ATTACHMENT A, and are subsequently submitted to Developer, shall be construed as
Eligible Costs pursuant to this subsection d; and
e. fees and costs incurred by City between the period of April 30, 2012, and the effective date
of this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that. (i) to the extent such fees and costs exist,
they have been incurred in connection with the processing of Project Approvals covered by
this Reimbursement Agreement; (ii) City has not yet billed Developer for fees or costs
incurred during such period, but Developer's reimbursement of such fees and costs is
anticipated; and (iii) as of the effective date of this Agreement, the total amount of such
fees and costs has not yet been precisely determined. The parties agree to cooperate in
good faith to determine the precise amount of such fees and costs, to coordinate City's
billing of such fees and costs, and to coordinate Developer's reimbursement of all such fees
and costs.
Eligible Costs as defined in this Reimbursement Agreement do not include City staff time, processing
costs, third party costs and legal fees which are already collected through the imposition of service
fees, state pass - through fees, development impact fees and specific plan /planned development
reimbursement fees, such as those described in the development fee estimate worksheet attached
as ATTACHMENT B (the "Development Fee Costs "). The intent of the Reimbursement Agreement is
to provide for reimbursement of City costs that will not be collected as Development Fee Costs and
City shall not seek reimbursement under this Reimbursement Agreement for any Development Fee
Costs.
The parties agree and acknowledge that ATTACHMENT B is an estimated worksheet and that the
City may enact and impose new or updated fees that are not included in the attached ATTACHMENT
B.
3. Payment of Eligible Costs. City shall submit to Developer a copy of each invoice, bill, demand or
other evidence ( "Invoice ") that the City has incurred Eligible Costs or other reasonable
substantiation of such Eligible Costs. Each such Invoice of Eligible Costs shall be paid in full by
Developer, without deduction or offset, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the Invoice.
Developer covenants and agrees that failure to pay such Eligible Costs to City in full within thirty (30)
calendar days of the date of such Invoice will result in a Late Charge in accordance with Section 4 of
this Agreement, as well as in the cessation of processing the Proposed Project in accordance with
3
Section 9 of this Agreement. Developer further covenants and agrees that, if as a result of a failure
to pay Invoice of Eligible Costs, City ceases processing the Proposed Project application in
accordance with Section 9, Developer shall not directly or indirectly initiate any litigation against City
or its employees, agents, or volunteers for the cessation or delay in processing such applications
following such failure to pay.
4. Late Charge. Developer acknowledges that the late payment of any Eligible Costs will cause City to
incur additional costs, including administration and collection costs and processing and accounting
of expenses ( "Delinquency Costs "). If City has not received payment of all Eligible Costs within thirty
(30) calendar days of the date of the Invoice, the Invoice is considered overdue and Developer shall
immediately be charged a late charge of five percent (5%) of the delinquent amount. The City is
then authorized to pay such Late Charge from the Deposit along with the amount of the unpaid
invoice of Eligible Costs in accordance with Section 5. City and Developer recognize that the
expenses that City shall suffer as a result of Developer's failure to make timely payments is difficult
to ascertain and agree that said five percent (5%) late charge represents a reasonable estimate of
the Delinquency Costs that would be incurred by City. City's acceptance of any such late charge
does not equate with a waiver of Developer's default with respect to the overdue amount, or
prevent City from exercising any rights and remedies available under this Agreement.
5. Security Deposit. Upon signature of this Agreement, Developer shall deposit with City the sum of
Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000) in cash or other immediately available funds ( "Deposit "), as
security for Developer's obligation to pay all Eligible Costs, as provided herein. The Deposit shall be
subject to the following:
a. Developer agrees that if Developer does not pay when due the full amount of each Invoice
of Eligible Costs as provided in Section 3 above, then the City is authorized to pay such
amount from the Deposit, which may include a Late Charge in accordance with Section 4.
b. If the City withdraws from the Deposit, the City shall immediately notify the Developer in
writing that it has used the Deposit to pay all or a portion of the bill, invoice, demand or
other evidence of Eligible Costs, and the Developer shall thereafter have fourteen (14)
calendar days to deposit with City, in cash, an amount necessary to restore the Deposit to its
full amount of $30,000. If the Developer fails to replenish the Deposit within said due date,
City shall have no obligation to continue processing the Proposed Project or to incur any
additional Eligible Costs.
c. If the amount of the unpaid Invoice of Eligible Costs and Late Charge exceeds the available
funds in the Deposit, the City shall immediately notify the Developer in writing that it has
used the Deposit to pay all or a portion of the bill, invoice, demand or other evidence of
Eligible Costs, and the Developer shall have fourteen (14) calendar days to deposit with City,
in cash, an amount necessary to restore the Deposit to its full amount of $30,000, plus the
full amount of the unpaid Invoice of Eligible Costs and applicable Late Charge. If the
Developer fails to fully replenish the Deposit, pay the full Invoice of Eligible Costs and
al
applicable Late Charge within said due date, City shall have no obligation to continue
processing the Proposed Projector to incur any additional Eligible Costs.
d. Developer further covenants and agrees that, if as a result of reduction of the Deposit to
zero dollars or failure to replenish, City ceases processing the Proposed Project application
in accordance with Section 9, Developer shall not directly or indirectly initiate any litigation
against City or its employees, agents, or volunteers for the failure to process or for delay in
processing such applications following such reduction or failure to replenish.
e. If this Agreement is terminated as provided in Section 9 below, City shall return to
Developer within ninety (90) calendar days following the effective date of termination that
portion of the Deposit that has not been expended or committed by City as provided herein,
if any, including interest.
6. No Commitment as to Future Approvals. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a
commitment to grant or issue any Project Approvals or any other preliminary or formal approvals in
connection with the Proposed Project or to enter into the proposed agreements. Developer
acknowledges and agrees that nothing in this Agreement limits City's discretion, in any manner, with
respect to any aspect of the Proposed Project or the proposed real estate transaction and fee credit
agreements. Developer agrees that it shall remain obligated to pay all Eligible Costs, regardless of
whether any aspect of the Proposed Project is approved and regardless of whether City and
Developer enter into the proposed agreements. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, City shall in
good faith expeditiously and with all diligence process the Project Approvals.
7. Indemnity. Developer shall defend (with counsel approved by City, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, employees, volunteers
and agents from and against any and all loss, liability, expenses, claims, costs (including reasonable
attorneys fees), suits and damages of every kind nature, and description, directly or indirectly arising
from any third party legal challenge to the Project Approvals, or the implementation of this
Agreement. Developer may defend against any such third party legal challenge as a Real Party in
Interest using counsel of Developer's choice, and Developer and City agree to cooperate in the joint
defense of the Project Approvals or the implementation of this Agreement. Developer's indemnity
obligations under this Section 7 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement but
cease in the event City denies the Proposed Project.
8. Termination. Developer may terminate this Agreement by providing thirty (30) calendar days
written notice to City. If Developer is in default of any of its obligations under this Agreement and
fails to cure such default within fourteen (14) calendar days following written notice from City, then
City may terminate this Agreement by notice to Developer and, thereafter, City shall have no further
obligation to process applications for the Proposed Project or to continue with negotiation and
drafting of the proposed agreements. Developer shall be responsible for the payment of Eligible
Costs incurred by City up to and including the date of termination regardless of which party
terminates this agreement.
5
9. Cessation of Processing. Developer acknowledges and agrees that City may, in its sole discretion,
cease processing the Proposed Project and all negotiations in connection with the proposed
agreements, if
a. this Agreement is terminated by either party following notice and expiration of any
applicable cure periods as provided herein; or
b. failure to pay such Eligible Costs to City in full within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of
such Invoice; or
c. the Deposit amount is reduced to zero and Developer fails to replenish the Deposit upon
request by City.
Developer further covenants and agrees that if City ceases processing the Proposed Project
applications for any of the foregoing reasons, Developer shall not directly or indirectly initiate any
litigation against City or its employees, agents, or volunteer for the failure to process or for delay in
processing such applications following such Agreement termination.
10. Attorneys Fees. If any legal action is brought by either party to interpret or enforce any terms or
provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees
and costs.
11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to
the matters set forth herein. Any amendments, modifications, or changes to this Agreement shall be
in writing and signed by both parties.
12. Waivers. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing
waiver or a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
13. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or the application of any such provision shall be held
by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable to any extent, the
remaining provisions of this Agreement and the application thereof shall remain in full force and
effect and shall not be affected, impaired or invalidated.
14. CEQA Processing. Developer acknowledges and agrees that the City is the lead agency under CEQA,
that the Wilfred /Dowdell Specific Plan EIR and Supplemental EIR must reflect City's independent
judgment and that City retains full discretion with respect to all findings to be made in connection
therewith.
15. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their
respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns.
16. Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of
California without regard to its choice of law rules. Jurisdiction and venue of litigation arising from
this Agreement shall be in the County of Sonoma, State of California.
9
17. Notices. Notices required by this Agreement shall be personally delivered, mailed, postage prepaid,
or mailed via nationally recognized overnight courier as follows:
To the Developer:
Baney Corporation/ Oxford Hotel Group
475 NE Bellevue Drive, Ste 210
Bend, OR 97701
Attn: Edmund Wadeson
Tel: (541) 749 -1059
Fax: (541) 382 -9461
To the City:
City of Rohnert Park
130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Attn: City Manager
Tel: (707) 588 -2226
Fax: (707)792 -1876
with a copy to:
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
1901 Harrison Street, 9th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
Attn: Michelle Marchetta Kenyon
Tel: (510) 273 -8780
Fax: (510) 839 -9104
Notices given by personal delivery shall be effective immediately. Notices given by overnight courier
shall be effective upon the date of delivery. Notices given by mail shall be deemed to have been
delivered five days after having been deposited in the United States mail. Any party may change its
address for notice by written notice to the other party in the manner provided in this paragraph 17.
18. Interpretation. The titles to the sections of this Agreement are not a part of this Agreement and
shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation of any part of this Agreement. As used
in this Agreement, masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall
each be deemed to include the others where and when the context so dictates. The word
"including" shall be construed as if followed by the words "without limitation." This Agreement is
the product of negotiations among the parties, and it shall not be construed as if it had been
prepared by one of the parties, but rather as if all of the parties have prepared the same. Any rule of
construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not
apply in interpreting this Agreement.
F
19. Authority. Each person executing this Agreement covenants and warrants that (i) the party on
whose behalf he or she is signing is duly incorporated or otherwise established or formed and validly
existing under the laws of its state of incorporation, establishment or formation, (ii) the party has
and is duly qualified to do business in California, (iii) the party has full corporate, partnership, trust,
association or other power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform all of its
obligations hereunder, and (iv) each person (and all of the persons if more than one signs) signing
this Agreement is duly and validly authorized to do so.
20. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts.
21. Assignment of Claims. To the extent City determines that it may have Claims against any Project
Consultant in connection with the Proposed Project, City may, upon written request by Developer,
assign such Claims to Developer. As used herein, "Project Consultant" means any consultant,
contractor, or other third party whose work product gives rise to any Eligible Cost or who is hired by
City in connection with the Project Approvals; and "Claims" means any and all claims, potential
claims, causes of action, and potential causes of action for breach of contract and /or professional
negligence, regardless of whether such claims or causes of action accrue prior to or after the
effective date of this Agreement.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
F:3
IN WITNE-S5 WHEREOF, the par -ties herein have eKeated this Agreementas of the date first above
written,
CITY_
CITY OF fiOHMERT PARK,
a MUniclpal corporation,
City manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
iEti?: At[���iy
ATTEST:
City, Cierk
DEVELOPM
BANEY CORPORATION,
an Oh?gon corporation
urt Raney, President ,.
3
ATTACHMENT A
OXFORD SUITES & INNS - Site Plan & Architectural Review (PL2011- 006SRIUP)
Expenses and deposits through 04/30/2012
SUMMARY
Amount
CONSULTANT SERVICES
$9,577.89
CITY STAFF PROJECT TIME
$64,318.73
CREDIT Deposits I Payments)
$96,833.92
Total Due I (Deposit Remaining)
($22,936.50)
This accounting includes services performed by City staff and consultant work performed, invoiced and paid by City.
Consultant Services
ompany ¢
rgana #ion
Invoice No.
Invoice Date
paid
Date p�id
Paid by Check No
Amount
W -Trans (supp. analysis & access study)
12657
4129111
.
5111111
199064
$2,345.00
W -Trans (supp. analysis & access study)
12686_
_ 613111
6115111
199739
$1,375.00
W -Trans (supp. analysis & access study)
12748
715111
7120111
200334
$205.00
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
153119_
1118112
2129112
204524
$1,503.00
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
153129
$3,439.58
2129112
204524
$2,670.20
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
153804
_1118/12
2113112
2129112
204524
$197.60
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
153793
2113112
2129/12
204524
$655.50
City administrative fee
Subtotal
7%
$8,951.30
$626.59
SUBTOTAL CONSULTING SUPPORT SERVICES $9,577.89
City Staff Services
Work performed _ _
Period
Amount
Application intake
January 2011
$69.63
Site plan submittal review, internal meetings
February 2011
$3,660.89
Site plan submittal review, intemal meetings^
March 2011
$1,113.67
Site plan submittal review, internal meetings
April 2011
$830.84
Review supp traffic analysis & access study; draft report outline; roads
May 2011
$944.05
Review supp traffic analysis & access study; roads & utilities
June 2011
$3,407.85
Draft staff report, mitigation measures, COAs, EIR
July 2011
$6,699.35
Conditions of approva I, fee estimate, access issues
Au us1 2011
$3,714.Q0
Conditions of approval, interim street layout, road alternatives
September 2011
$1,373.87
Conditions of approval, preliminary SUSMP, right -of -wa
October 2011
$3,439.58
Conditions of approval
November 2011
$1,716.00
Conditions of approval, meetings, reimbursement agreement, fee estimate
December 2011
$11,679.25
Conditions of approval, reimbursement agreement, fee estimate, bio
January 2012
$11,732.75
Conditions of approval, reimbursement agreement, Planning Cmsn, meetings
February 2012
$6,873.50
Conditions of approval, reimbursement agreement
March 2012
_
$7,063.50
SUBTOTAL CITY STAFF PROJECT TIME $64,318.73
TOTAL EXPENSES $73,896.62
DEPOSITS
Description
Date of payment
Check No.
Receipt No.
Amount
Deposit
1/14/2011
702986
RCPT2011 -99
$1,200.00)
Deposit
3/8/2011
705102
RCPT2011 -270
($4,950.00)
Deposit
4/412011
_
705557
RCPT2011 -269
($23,075.00
Deposit
4/8/2011
705673
RCPT2011 -315
($3,530.52)
Deposit
3/23/2012
71_7877
RCPT2012 -198
($34,077.60)
Deposit
3/30/2012
718076
RCPT2012 -213
$30,000.00
TOTAL DEPOSITS 1 PAYMENTS ($96,833.12)
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE / (DEPOSIT REMAINING) ($22,936.50)
10
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF ROHNERT PART(
Deveio ment Fees Estimate Worksheet
The Development Fees Estimate Worksheet is provided as an ESTIMATE only. The values calculated in this estimate are based on (1) fees and rates in effect
at the time the worksheet is completed, (2) information provided by the applicant on the Development Fee Estimate Request, and (3) any new /revised
project infonnation provided by the applicant prior to the completion of the estimate. As this worksheet is an estimate only, the final fees calculated and due
at building permit issuance may vary from the estimate. Such variance may be due to new project information revealed in the plan review, plan check
submittals and/or inspections over the number provided by the building fees, consulting or legal services not included in service fees but necessary to provide
services specifically listed below, or impact fee or rate changes that come into effect prior to building permit issuance.
Date Fee Estimate Created I Last Revised Februa 3, 2012
Building Permit Number TBD
Job Address TBD/Oxford Suites Hotel - Wilfred Dowdell Area
CONSTRUCTION VALUE, ACREAGE, UNITS
Acres 3:79 acres
Total Construction Value I $8,150,000:00
Provided by: Applicant
Construction Type
2010 CBC
Occupancy Classification
Gross Floor Area I Enclosed Thousand Square Feet
Note., Gross Floor Area defined in Ch. 17.04 ofMuni Code.
Total Building Area ( sq.ft.)
Note: Conditioned space as indicated by applicant.
Prior Building Area (sq.ft.)
Net Increase (sq. ft.)
Sewer Capacity Credit(s)
Disturbed Thousand Square Feet
Note: Based an total area approved for grading. May use site acreage as proxy
roc estimating purposes.
FEE CALCULATIONS
IIIA
ft -1
- 107,258 s.f.
107,258 s.f.
O s.f,
107258 s.f.
0.00 GALIDAY
Calculation by site acrege 165.09 1000 s.f.
Approved grading - 1000 S.f.
Service Fees
1 Building Plan Check
obtain from current tee table
18,493.48
2 Building Permit & Inspection
Obtain from current tee table
, 24,126.45
3 Fire Services Plan Check
(35% of Bldg. Dept. Plan check or $50, whichever is greater)
6 ,472.72
4 Fire Code /Life Safety Compliance Fee
(36% of Bldg. Dept. Permit fee or $75, whichever is greater)
%' 8,444,26
5 Engineering Plan Check
(Estimate only. Fee due at permit issuance is based on actual cost.)
:1.5000.00
6 Engineering Grading /Site Work
(Estimate only. Fee due at permit issuance is based on actual cost.)
600:00
7 Archiving of plans, permits & other documents
155.00
State Pass - Through Fees
8 Strong Motion Fee
$0.211$1000 valuation
1;711.50
9 Building Standards Administration Special Revolving Fund (BLDST) (First $1o0K = $4; every additional $25K Add $1)
326.00
Development Impact Fees
Use drop -down list to select Specific Pfan or Planned Development Area
Wilfred Dowdell SPA
Use drop down list to select Land Use Designation for PFF determination
Hotel/Motel - -
10 Public Facility Fee - Non -res fee, public facilities
$fi;401:Op per 1,000 s.f.
656;558.46
11 Public Facility Fee - Non -res fee, sewer component
$59:36 x daily ttow gallons 11462.50
=! 737;038.75
12 Public Facility Fee - Non -res fee, drainage component
$243.06 per 1,000 s.f.
40,116.87.
13 Special Water Connection Fee (OR see Line 14)
$8,935 per acre
0.00
Parcel was previously assessed at less than $4, 700 /acre: Type TRUE or
FALSE
FALSE
14 Per Acre Development (OR see Line 13)
$17,715 per acre
- :..::67139:85
Parcel was previously assessed: Type TRUE or FALSE
1FALSE - -
15 Copeland Creek Drainage Fee
$630 per acre
0:00
Parcel is subject to fee: Type TRUE or FALSE
]FALSE.
16 Affordable Housing Linkage Fee
741008.02
17 General Plan Maintenance Fee
(1.5% of construction valuation
40,750:00
Specific Plan f Planned Development Reimhursernent Fees
1s Wilfred/Dowdell Specific Plan Reimbursement Fees
$16,321,82 per acre, if applicable
.;859.70
SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL
Less pre -paid fees
plan check deposit
NETDUE
COMMENTSINOTES
The Engineering fees depend not only on the size and complexities of the project, but on the ability of the developer's engineers to clearly
solve problems. Ignoring an issue can result in an extra plan check and the expenses thereto.
�l
Printed 21312012, 5:38 PM 045 -055 -007, Hotel, Redwood & Wiitred (New Fee Schedule)_2 -3 -12