2011/07/12 City Council Agenda Packet
City of Rohnert Park. 130 Avram Avenue. Rohnert Park, California 94928
PHONE: (707) 588-2227. FAX: (707) 792-1876 . WEB: www.rvcitv.orl!
ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
Community Development Commission
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, July 12,2011
Joint Regular Meeting - Open Session: 5:00 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBER
130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California
The Rohnert Park City Council welcomes your attendance, interest and
participation at its regular city meetings scheduled on the
2nd and 4th Tuesdays of each month at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber.
City Council/CDC/RPFA Agendas and Minutes may be viewed at the City's website:
www.rpcitv.orJ!
Council/CDC/RPF A may discuss and/or take action on any or all of the items listed on this agenda.
If you challenge decisions of the City Council, the Community Development Commission, or the
Rohnert Park Financing Authority of the City of Rohnert Park in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearing(s) described in this Agenda, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Rohnert Park at, or prior to the public hearing(s).
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or
other person to assist you while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City
Clerk's Office at (707) 588-2225 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements
for accommodation by the City. Please make sure the City Clerk's Office is notified as soon as
possible if you have a visual impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another
format (Braille, audio-tape, etc.)
PUBLIC COMMENTS: For public comment on items listed or not listed on the
agenda, or on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time (limited to three
minutes per appearance and a 30 minute total time limit, or allocation of time based
on number of speaker cards submitted)
- PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING -
*SEE NOTE AT THE END OF THIS AGENDA
Capies .of all staffreparts and dacuments subject ta disclasure that relate ta each item .of business referred t.o an the
agenda are available far public inspectian Thursday befare each regularly scheduled City Cauncil meeting at City
Hall, lacated at 130 A vram A venue. Any writings .or dacuments subject ta disclasure that are pravided ta all, .or a
majarity .of all, .of the members .of the City Cauncil regarding any item an this agenda after the agenda has been
distributed will alsa be made available far inspectian at City Hall during regular business haurs.
"')
'.
,
ANNOUNCEMENT: Please turn off all pagers, cellular telephones and all
other communication devices upon entering the Council Chamber because of
electrical interference with the sound recording and TV broadcast systems.
5:00 p.m.
1. CITY COUNCIL, CDC & RPFA JOINT REGULAR MEETING - Call to Order/Roll Call
(Ahanotu _ Callinan_Mackenzie _ Stafford _ Belforte ~
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PRESENTATIONS
A. Recognition of Members of the Sewer Rate Fund Stakeholders Group
B. Presentation by Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCT A)/Caltrans regarding
Highway 101 traffic switch and 12-day closure of Commerce Boulevard
4. CITY MANAGER / CITY ATTORNEY / DEPARTMENT HEAD BRIEFINGS
This time is set aside for City Staff to present a verbal report to the Council on the activities
of their respective departments. No action may be taken except to place a particular item on a
future agenda for Council consideration.
A. Public Safety Update on Fourth of July Fireworks
B. Code Compliance Report for June 2011
C. 2010 Annual Water Report
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item or on City business not
listed on the Agenda may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes.
Those wishing to address the Council on any report item listed on the Agenda should submit
a "Speaker Card" to the City Clerk before announcement of that agenda item.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the consent calendar will be considered together by one action of the City
Council, the Community Development Commission, and/or the Rohnert Park Financing
Authority, whichever is applicable, unless any Council Member or anyone else interested in a
consent calendar item has a question about the item.
A. Approval of Minutes for:
1. City-CDC-RPF A Joint Regular Meeting - June 28, 2011
B. Acceptance of Reports for:
1. City Bills/Demands for Payment dated July 12,2011
2. CDC Bills/Demands for Payment dated July 12,2011
C. City Council Resolution for Adoption:
1. 2011-60 Approving a Change - in the Salary Range for Economic Development
Manager from 94M to 98M
D. Acceptance of 4th Quarter Report for FY 201012011 on City Council Travel Expenditures
7. CLASS II BIKE LANE INSTALLATION ON CAMINO COLEGIO
Consideration of installation of a Class II Bike Lane on Camino Colegio between Southwest
Boulevard and East Cotati Avenue by eliminating parking on the west side of Camino
Colegio, north of Cala Way and south of Casa Way and eliminating parking on the east side
of Camino Colegio, north of Casa Way and south of Southwest Boulevard
A. Staff Report
B. Public Comments
C. Resolution for Adoption:
2011-61 Approving Installation of a Class II Bicycle Lane on Camino Colegio
between Southwest Boulevard and East Cotati A venue
a. Council motion/discussion/vote
8. SONOMA COUNTY/CITY SOLID WASTE ADVISORY GROUP (SWAG) UPDATE
Consideration of accepting report regarding SWAG activities, providing feedback on
Research Report recommendations, and directing the City's SWAG member to vote to
proceed with a consultant study of the recommendations
A. Staff Report / Presentation by SWAG representatives
B. Public Comments
C. Council discussion/direction/action
9. FEE WAIVER AND CO-SPONSORSHIP POLICY
Consideration of establishing a Fee Waiver and Co-sponsorship Policy to address requests
from governmental agencies, local non-profit and community service organizations, and
private enterprises to co-sponsor various activities, or to waive temporary use permit fees
and/or rental fees for the use of City facilities.
A. Staff Report
B. Public Comments
C. Council discussion/direction
10. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE
Consideration of designating a voting delegate and alternate for the League of California
Cities Annual Conference to be held September 21-23,2011, in San Francisco
A. Council discussion/direction/action
11. STANDING COMMITTEE / AD HOC COMMITTEE / LIAISON REPORTS
This time is set aside to allow Council members serving on Council committees or on
regional boards, commissions or committees to present a verbal report on the activities of the
respective boards, commissions or committees on which they serve. No action may be taken.
A. Standing Committee Reports
B. Liaison Reports
1. Sonoma County Transportation Authority/Regional Climate Protection Authority
(SCTAlRCPA), 7/11/11 (1M)
2. Russian River Watershed Association Technical Working Group, 7/12/11 (1M)
C. Other Reports
).,
"
12. COMMUNICATIONS
Copies of communications have been provided to Council for review prior to this meeting.
Council Members desiring to read or discuss any communication may do so at this time. No
action may be taken except to place a particular item on a future agenda for Council
consideration.
13. MATTERS FROM/FOR COUNCIL
A. Future agenda item regarding Council consideration of City participation and financial
contribution to the City's 50th Anniversary Celebration.
1. Council discussion/direction
14. PUBLIC COMMENTS
15. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION IN CONFERENCE ROOM 2A TO CONSIDER:
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
(Government Code S54956.9) Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision
(b) of Government Code S54956.9: one case
B. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government Code S54957.6)
Agency designated representative: Gabriel Gonzalez, City Manager
Rohnert Park Employees' Association (RPEA)
Rohnert Park Public Safety Officers' Association (RPPSOA)
Service Employees' International Union (S.E.I.U.) Local 1021
Confidential and Management Units
16. RECONVENE OPEN SESSION IN COUNCIL CHAMBER
17. MAYOR'S REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION (Government Code ~ 54957.1)
18. ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: Time shown for any particular matter on the agenda is an estimate only. Matters may be considered
earlier or later than the time indicated depending on the pace at which the meeting proceeds. If you wish to speak on
an item under discussion by the Council which appears on this agenda, after receiving recognition from the Mayor,
please walk to the rostrum and state your name and address for the record.
- PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING -
Any item raised by a member of the public which is not agendized and may require Council action shall be
automatically referred to staff for investigation and disposition which may include placing on a future agenda. Ifthe
item is deemed to be an emergency or the need to take action arose after posting of the agenda within the meaning
of Government Code Section 54954.2(b), Council is entitled to discuss the matter to determine if it is an emergency
item under said Government Code and may take action thereon.
CERIFICA TION OF POSTING OF AGENDA
I, Terri Griffin, City Clerk for the City of Rohnert Park, declare that the foregoing agenda for the Ju]y ]2,2011,
Joint Regu]ar Meeting of the Rohnert Park City Council/CDC/RPFA was posted and avai]able for review on
July 7, 20]], at Rohnert Park City Hall, 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California 94928. The agenda is
also available on the City web site at www.rpcitv.ore:,
Executed this 7'h day of Ju]y, 20] ], at Rohnert Park, California.
071211 AGENDA-JT REGULAR MTG OF RPCITY COUNCIL-CDC-RPFA.DOC
.>
COURTESY AGENDA
, 07/12/11
cc: T. Griffin, City Clerk
Connie Bolmeier
Rohnert Park-Cotati Regional Library
6250 Lynne Conde Way
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Barbara Tatman
gbtatman@comcast.net
David Stubblebine
dstub@hotmail.com
Ira Freed
ira@irafreed.com
Michael McCaffry
asktheace@me.com
Pat Miller
patm illersmail@gmail.com
Item 3.B
Seana Gause - Tom Donohoe
Brian F. Beaudoin
Caltrans
brian f beaudoin@dot.ca.gov
Rey Centeno
Caltrans
rev centeno@dot.ca.gov
NOTE:
Place marker on agenda for each
individual recipient.
Item 3.A
Andy Durkee - Susan Adams
Bonnie Black
BonnieLBlack@aol.com
Elaine Sampson
Jo-ell@comcast.net
Jennifer Wiltermood
imillrmood@aol.com
Mike Thompson
Mike scwa@hotmail.com
Paul Libeu
Paul.libeu@att.net
Seana Gause
SCTA
Seana.Gause@sonoma-countv.org
Dale Lagallee
Caltrans
dale legallee@dot.ca.gov
Tom Donohoe
Ghilotti Bros.
TomD@ghilottibros.com
Andy Durkee
Andv@durkees.net
Brian Thomas
Brian. thomas@proforma.com
Gerard Guidice
gman@iscweb.com
Joseph Gaffney
J gaffnev@comcast.net
Nick Aronis
nick@thegodfrevgrouP.com
Susan Adams
susan@hollingsworthinsurance.com
Robert Haus
Caltrans
robert haus@dot.ca.gov
Hal Streater
Caltrans
hal streater@dot.ca.gov
<",
Item 4.B
Marilyn Ponton
Planning and Building Manager
Development Services
ItemS
Martha Cheever, Executive Secretary
Sonoma County Department of
Transportation & Public Works
Martha.cheever@sonoma-countv .or~
Item 4.C
Carol Adams
Administrative Analyst
Public Works and Community Services
Item 7
Patrick Barnes
Deputy City Engineer
Development Services
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
t(U
~ame:
~em#:
\ddress:
~hone: (~-q) -::J-q-,2 - If:lD:::)
~
rOPIC: ~t' '\B-teAl'dlt{~~
Brief Summary of Comments: ' _
~~o~~er~~'
~~i "S\~V\..
See Reverse ~
Q)
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
Date:~ /2 ~genda Item #: Z
Name:.A(~ 7. 6(~~
Address: /3Q5 ~u7fW~r13LIJcJtJr7
Phone: c'c9..3 -0 Cj:A Cj'
See Reverse ~
Date:
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
Agenda Item #: t:I
V, '-rt C-c I'L- t- ~ C?-? I ~'-
(j)e
Name:
Address:
Phone:
TOPIC:
l3(kc A~
Brief Summary of Comments:
fJ~ v<rr- ~ s!-%
IS fJ/4C- -r I've / ~
See Reverse ~
,
L
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
Date: 711'2//,( Agenda Item #: 7
Name: ;:T6J!fJ 0v7,-f/-<!tJ ./
Address: 7! C;S (QI C f1i!rtj/J() Cott6/0
Phone: 70"7 - 795-- 6/71--
(!J)
II. I -
TOPIC: C f'r/!Vo Q::Jti&-IO V Il'{ 1-/!-.l/[/
Brief Summary of Comments:
See Reverse ~
. #ITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD, (Y
Date: 1/ to! I Agenda. Item #:~
Name: r!:!:r....:'"- ~ GYJ W
Address:~r 0 a r; Vl' /~i(Y.ft -'Abhn-
Phone: !:>7S () / S?:>
See Reverse -+
f[P't
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD ~
Date: () 1/' (2 I i) Agenda Item #: 1-
Name: ~r~o/\ WH tr6l/Yl C
Address: ,,' S I ~ So '^'~ \~ S +- ~l \Ai.
Phone: 701 ~ "1 q l( - q:> ~ ,
TOPIC:C.l d\.~ S 1] IStl,<
Brief Summary of Comments:
.... .s t f -(' e t J\ ~c--J...s
I .
C~ ~ r/"v \./l ~
C 0 <;; ~ ']; <-- '^ ~ rrOc I
-- r rv'l PI)...t;! , r 0 Cd, { /-r <: c.:).:e.-./'~J
V' [j'L~(J -1 { v' \ ~ .
.5~ pf,r 1. ~t ~~~~t>'Jwt, fl~
~5 f): (Ov1-('/lrJ
coer ~,' ().
+ r 0\. {.{ r c...
See Reverse -+
.~().)/v ~ )
~!v
IN SONOMA COUNTY
IN AND NEAR ROHNERT PARK
FROM ROHNERT PARK EXPRESSWAY OVERCROSSING
TO SANTA ROSA AVENUE OVERCROSSING
Stage 2 Cross-5ectlon
COLl
LINE
0.61
Va.
Exist
ETW
0.61
6.6
SB
TRAfFIC
LANE
CLl
liNE
I
O~61
R/W
Built In
preVI0US~
stoge
...- ~~!!!!lIue~!!~ :ffiNC
o /,/4{' -- ------ ,~~.~: ----
_G;.-"'_________________,..- 1 Temp (~T.Wl~W WAL
~:Tt!iNG
TYPE tKI
From previou
Stage
1
l
~
Construct S8 mainline
and complete
construction of Wilfred
Ave
IN SONOMA COUNTY
IN AND NEAR ROHNERT PARK
FROM ROHNERT PARK EXPRESSWAY OVERCROSSING
TO SANTA ROSA AVENUE OVERCROSSING
Stage 3
Il:al!!s
Shill NB & SB mainline
lralllc 10 Ihe NB elde.
Open newly
conetructed NB Wilted
Ave off/oR*rampa. S8
on.ramp from WJfred,
ColUDlst, and
ColUDlalIWIlfnldAve
SB off-ramp
WILFRED Ave/Golf Course Dr OFF.RAMPvla (NEW)
r. o. ommerceBlvd via REPLAC )
r. 0.20.287
lilt
La
1
!
i /11"""""""
/1111 .MOOR
I
I
""","'1
aBan
R..
Sta "CL1"m..
STA:"CL1" ~-KP"O
PM 15.5
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
4
PM 13.9
.CONTRACT NO. 129654
'--
~=l'::i~g,:o~,,~n:1CT~04T'"
,~
.J
STAt _ ..
Till ~~::i
, ;~(/ /(,1 ,-~
/./:1~V~~_~~-=::-~~~:'_:~: .:. ~~~~~:
I::;'~-.:.'..I .':'=:':~,
-- .--::0-::':';";'- rCl:~ .:--~;
~'~"'.:l
NIII'UII........-rl'...
nootcoorpu:1'__....~
.. ~ ~ ':' ~......~..
"'t..:."":,=....':'...
ICIJ~'
2
IN SONOMA COUNTY
IN AND NEAR ROHNERT PARK
FROM ROHNERT PARK EXPRESSWAY OVERCROSSING
TO SANTA ROSA AVENUE OVERCROSSING
Stage 3 - Cross Section
JJ.
'"
CL
LINE
JJ. JJ.
0.61
0'.61 Vcr
6.6 B.6 1.0 Var R/W
SB NO
TRAfFIC TRAFFl
LANE LANE
COLl
LINE. 1.5
Vcr 1.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 ".9 Vat'
\ .. vcr
"of 1
...-'E~~~!!!::!!~ ...
~ ........." "":---7 ........ FOR DETAILS
,;,....... LFOR DETAILS ... SEE TYPICAL
.......... SEE TYPICAL ~_ ~~~"!!~-
........'" X-SECllON ---L-
...-:..________________-/ ~~~KmING
"ALL
Temp RAILING
(Type Kl
!l__~~---~~!'l-.........
LFOR DETAILS SEE ..................
TYPlCAl X-SECTION .......' r::EXiS+ CHAIN
____-----------.... 'ij LINK FENCE
RET liNING WALL ~.......~ .f OG
~~
Temp RETA
SHOUL.D BE
AND BURIED
THE STRUC
FOR nNAL
SECTION A-A
ITY?ICALl
NO SCALE
~
3
\
Detours
.~~DP
4
p(..t~ cc:
cc:
~~ V.
r. @ Mtg. Of:-1
File:
File:
ZJI
Co.d.~>C()l11pliance
e.One Part-time Code Compliance Officer
e Works Tuesday - Thursday
eStartedApril2011
e Complaint Based System
,- -',' . .'.....,..'..,'-..,-.... ,"'.- .'. ...... ,..... - .,--....- -' .'. ".,'-
. eGenerally,property owners deaf with'.
issues after one or two contacts. '
7/14/2011
tA0) D.)..~
1
Code Complaints - May & June
Weeds/
Debris
Signs
Vehicles - Before
7/14/2011 It
2
Vehicles- After
Vehicle- Before
7/14/2011
3
Vehicle -After
7/14/2011 '"
4
W.eeds-Before
7/14/2011
5
Weeds-Before
7/14/2011 \
6
Weeds - After
Debris.... Befo.re
7/14/2011
7
Debris-Before
7/14/2011
\.
8
Debris ...B.efore
7/14/2011
9
Car.canopy.-Before
7/14/2011 \
10
Car Canopy - After
Car Canopy - Before
7/14/2011
11
Car Canopy - After
Code. CC>l1'1pli.Cln ce-Nex!?!~~~?
· Automating complaint, case file, letter
generation, and documentation
Citizens will have one stop location for all
complaints - Public Works or Code Compliance
· Public Safety filling Neighborhood.
Preservation- position next. week, ' ,
'.~. We'.willwor~together'on'cqd~'issues:"
',....Public SatetyfdrpubJi~right~of~wayiss."
. . -",,;'.-' y. ,i. ;i,,, > 0.,.;"-,;,,:;,,, -,!""....:",' ;""--':"">"";;'''-~'~ ;-",';1t-?):1;::;W:~i::i('~~J::;;~~:;;'2;:},:: ~':<;':?,2//'.;';'" s; ,',' ,;",,::_-,<,';"", :,,,..,,:-,)~-.,c,,;>, "':~
7/14/2011
"
12
Code Compliance Issues
· Please call 588-2249 for anonymous
complaints regarding:
..... Weeds
.... Inoperable Vehicles
.... Car Canopies
..... Debris
7/14/2011
13
7/14/2011
o t-V~~)
,Acl vv-1 \A-.
1
7 /14/2011 ~
2
7/14/2011
3
7 /14/2011 ~
4
7/14/2011
5
7/14/2011
j
"
6
..Facility Reservation
· Appeal to City Manager
7/14/2011
7
7/14/2011 '\
8
Griffin, Terri
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Griffin, Terri
Thursday, July 07, 2011 4:12 PM
Andy Durkee; Barbara Tatman; Bonnie Black; Brian Thomas; David Stubblebine; Elaine
Sampson; Gerard Guidice; Ira Freed; Jennifer Wiltermood; Joseph Gaffney; Michael
McCaffry; Mike thompson; Nick Aronis; Pat Miller; Paul Libeu; Susan Adams
Lidster, Beth
July 12th City Council Meeting Agenda
071211 AGENDA-Jt Regular Mtg of RPCity Council-CDC-RPFApdf
To all members of the Sewer Rate Fund Stakeholders Group:
Attached for your information is the agenda for next Tuesday's City Council meeting, which begins at 5:00 p.m. (See
Item 3.A.) If you haven't already done so, please call Beth Lidster at 588-2226 to advise whether you will be able to
attend.
Hope you can join us!
Terri
Terri A. Griffin, CMC
City Clerk
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
ir (707) 588-2225
~ (707) 792-1876
~ tgriffin(Qlrpcity.org
- FRIDA Y CLOSURE: Please note that City Hall is open Monday through Thursday, 8 am - 5 pm, and is closed on Friday.-
1
Griffin. Terri
From:
Sent:
To:
Griffin, Terri
Thursday, July 07, 2011 4:25 PM
'Seana Gause'; 'Brian F Beaudoin'; 'Dale Legallee'; 'Hal Streater'; 'Robert Haus'; 'Rey
Centeno'; 'Tom Donohoe'
Barnes, Patrick
SCTAlCaltrans Report on July 12th City Council Agenda
071211 AGENDA-Jt Regular Mtg of RPCity Council-CDC-RPFA.pdf
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Attached for your information is the agenda for the July lth Rohnert Park City Council meeting, which begins at 5:00
p.m. (See Item 3.B.) If a PowerPoint presentation will be made, please email that presentation to me at
tgriffin@rpcitV.org no later than noon on Tuesday, July lih.
Thanks,
Terri
Terri A. Griffin, CMC
City Clerk
em OF ROHNERT PARK
130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
if (707) 588-2225
~ (707) 792-1876
I2l tgriffin@rpcity.org
- FRIDA Y CLOSURE: Please note that City Hall is open Monday through Thursday, 8 am - 5 pm, and is closed on Friday.-
1
Sonoma 101 Widening
Petalmna to Winds
li:IItrcrn5.
:hw\Jr
Di$tr. @ Mtg. Of: -J
. e
Major Work Anticipated Through Summer 2011
Wilfred Avenue Interchange
JUNE 9, 2011
NEWSLETTER
VOLUME No. 01
ISSUE No. 03
Road Improvements Mainline Route 101
· Complete paving for traffic switch to new northbound structures
· Traffic shift to new NB/SB temporary alignment
· Traffic switch to new Southbound Wilfred Off-Ramp and re-open Santa
Rosa Avenue On-Ramp
· Construct embankment for new 101 southbound lanes between temporary
retaining walls
Bridge Improvements Mainline Route 101
· Open new Wilfred A venue Off-Ramp
· Open new northbound stage of Commerce Boulevard Viaduct
· Open new northbound stage of Wilfred Avenue Undercrossing
Demolish remaining existing Commerce Boulevard Viaduct
Construct the foundations for the final stages of southbound Wilfred
Undercrossing and Commerce Boulevard bridges
California Department of
Transportation
Public Information Officer - Sonoma
County
111 Grand Avenue
Oakland, CA 94162
(510) 286-5576
www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/projects.htm
Hotline
1-866-322-0614
Summer Lane Closures
Local Street Improvements
· Roberts Lake Road sidewalk and access upgrades
· Commerce Boulevard realignment and access upgrades
· Complete railroad improvements at Golf Course Drive
· Intermittent mainline 101 and ramp
lane closures
· Two week full closure of Commerce
Boulevard planned for late July
· Intermittent full night closures of
Commerce Blvd planned through
summer and fall
Funding Sources
· CMIA - Proposition 1 B
· SCTA - Measure M
· State - STlPIRIP
,c...".:...................... .... ...........'.......... '.'-.:: -'.':..' .... " ,.....' ..... .'.' - .' _". '. . '.. '.... '....,.. '. . . ............ -c..' .' ....' ~. . ....... \.'.' '.'.' .' "..' '. -. _'.' _...... ;'.. .."'.:.._"." ..... ........-..' .' ......' ........ .' ...... -.' '.' .... ..' '.
< " .,,'.'- -: - ,', " - -':: - - - " ,', - - ,,'- .---::.-: ,:-,- "-",'-:',."
Maj()~lJJlQ()tlling Milestones Through Fall 2011 on. the Wilfred Interchange Project
raffic switch to new northbound bridges July 2011
al stage of new bridge construction August 2011
Page 2
~
liIItrans.
.,...."..."""..,"......"",.....'.....""'1
Pepper Road in Petaluma to Rohnert Park Expressway
(Central A Project)
Road Improvements Mainline Route 101
Bridge Improvements Mainline Route 101
.
Construct sound walls multiple locations .
Sierra A venue ramp upgrades
Hwy 116 ramp upgrades ·
Electrical and drainage upgrades at multiple locations ·
Structural section and AC paving multiple locations
Construct concrete median barrier ·
Final hot mix asphalt overlay
Southbound widening at Laguna De Santa Rosa and
Copeland Creek bridges
Construct new southbound 101/116 Separation bridge
Complete Sierra Ave Undercrossing northbound
widening
Construct new northbound Railroad Avenue
Undercrossing
Local Street Improvements
· Commerce Boulevard upgrades
· Route 116 upgrades
· Sierra A venue upgrades
· Old Redwood Hwy access to 101
.
.
.
.
.
.
Summer Lane Closures
Funding Sources
. CMIA - Proposition 1 B
. SCTA - Measure M
· State - STlPIRIP
· Intermittent mainline 101 and
ramp lane closures
· Weekend closures at Sierra Ave
and Railroad Ave NB Off-ramps
Near Old Redwood Hwy in Petaluma to Pepper Road
(Central B Project)
Road and Bridge Improvements Mainline Route 101
Funding Sources
· Construction starts June 2011
· Median 101 widening
· Median 101 bridge widening at Willow Brook Creek
· Outside shoulder 101 widening
· Soundwall construction along southbound 10 1
· Pepper Road ramp improvements
· Anticipated completion of all work November 2011
· CMIA - Proposition 1 B
Summer Lane Closures
· Intermittent mainline 101
and ramp lane closures
Major Work Milestones for Central A and 8 Projects
Complete all work for Central A project by November 2011
Complete Central B Project by
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
City of Rohnert Park 130 Avram Avenue Rohnert Park, CA 94928
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
June 28,2011
TO:
City Council
COPY:
Gabe Gonzalez
FROM:
Darrin Jenkins
RE: Code Compliance - June Monthly Report
Statistical Report:
Month YTn
Complaints 19 47
Cases Opened/Notices Sent 49 124
Cases Closed 42 77
No. of Permits Generated 3 6
Abatements 0 0
Complaint Types:
WeedsIDebris 5 18
Graffiti 1 1
Vehicles 2 5
Building 1 1
Zoning 5 11
Signs 3 9
Other 0 0
7/12/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 4.B
Abandoned Vehicle Abatement:
MarkedIN oticed Removed Towed
Month 13 4 0
YTO 27 17 1
Highlighted Cases:
Emily Ave. - Several property owners were found to have inoperable vehicles and miscellaneous debris.
CCO Hearn found that two of the properties were rentals and contacted all the owners. The owners
cooperated and the properties were brought into compliance.
Arlen - CCO Hearn fond this property to be a foreclosure with overgrown weeds approximately 4-foot
high. He was able to get in contact with the new owner. The owner cut the weeds and will maintain the
property.
Liman - CCO Hearn observed a garage converted into unpermitted habitable space. He spoke to the
tenants and they cooperated. The conversion included a full bathroom and had several life safety
violations. Building Inspector Greg Adams ordered the conversion vacated. CCO Hearn contacted the
property owner and he claimed no knowledge of the unpermitted conversion. A violation notice was sent.
and the conversion will be removed.
Lords Manor - CCO Hearn investigated a complaint of a large accessory shed under construction. Hearn
contacted the property owner, who allowed an inspection of the property. Hearn found the shed required a
permit and was built within the rear yard setback. He also found a second shed with electrical, a bed and a
TV. The owner said the shed was not used as habitable space and agreed to remove the electrical, bed and
TV. The violation notice was sent and owner is correcting the violations.
Sequoia/Civic Center Dr. - CCO Hearn investigated a complaint of obstructions on the sidewalks in this
area. He found several portable basketball hoops completely blocking the sidewalks on several streets.
Violation notices were sent and everyone cooperated and removed the obstacles.
Snyder/Camino Corto - CCO Hearn observed an in-progress roof repair at this complex with no permit
card posted. He contacted the workers and confirmed no permit had been issued. The company
cooperated and obtained the proper permits.
Landsdown Cir - Officer Vincent requested CCO Hearn inspect a property for an inoperable vehicle and
debris. Hearn checked and found four properties with violations, two of which were rental properties.
Hearn contacted the property owners and violations are being corrected.
substances That Could Be in Water
lie sources of drinking water (both tap water
' o Q o
aid bottled' water) include rivers, lakes, streams,
;� N
reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels
' v
wer the surface of the land or through the ground,
U
dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some
ases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances
4ulting from the presence of animals or from human
ctivi[y,
a order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the
J.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and
e State Department of Public Health (Department)
rescribe regulations that hrriit the amount of certain
ontaminants m " water provided by public water
ptems Department regulations also establish limits
it contaminants in bottled water that must provide
ae same protection for public health. Drinking water,
icluding bottled water, may reasonably be expected to
ontain at least small amounts of some contaminants.
'he presence of contaminants does not necessarily
idicate that water poses a health risk.
�onza�inants�� that may be present in source water
icrobial'Contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria,
xatay coYne from sewage treatment plants, septic
itemS,, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife;
aorgaue Contaminants, such as salts and metals, that
an bez naturally occurring or can result from urban
orrtib
tvater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater
zschges, oil and gas'production, mining; or farming;
'esicides and Herbicides, that may come from a
ane ;of sources, such as agriculture, urban, stormwater
toff,'and residential uses;
)rgantc Chemical Contaminants, including synthetic
o
nclol "atifeorganic chemicals, which are by-
products
i� processes and and petroleum production and
7 b
rhrch can also come from gas stations, urbanstormwater
G
F
.tnof,agrrcultural applications, and septic systems;
00
cv
adioactive Contaminants,;, that can be naturally
E
o a
d
ecurrtng or c fie the result 'bf oil a�d,gas production
Q
v °
5 ,
nd rninmg activities `'
V
[
v h
E
lore information about'&kitaminants'and
x
0 4
v o '�,
o z
potential .-
ealth effects can be obtained by calling the U.S. EPA's
�°
4-
o 7
afe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426 -4791.
O W
C
°
m
o -�
U 0
G ~O 1
E °
f. .�
N s
0 _Oo
® U Q U
4p"Na RT PARk
Presented By
City of Rohnert Park
'C/LIPORN'
Quality Firsfi
We are pleased to provide you with this year's
Annual Water Quality Report. This edition covers
all testing completed from January 1 through December
31, 2010. Over the years, we have dedicated ourselves to
producing drinking water that meets or exceeds all state
and federal drinking water standards. We continually
strive to adopt new and better methods for delivering
the best quality drinking water to you. As new challenges
to drinking water safety emerge, we remain vigilant
in meeting the challenges of source water protection,
water conservation, and community education while
continuing to serve the needs of our water customers.
Included in this report is a summary of results from
water quality tests, an explanation of our water sources,
and information on how to interpret the data. This
"Consumer Confidence Report" is required by law, and
we are proud to share our results with you.
f.
s
a Jk ''€
Source Water. ascription
The City of Rohnert Park delivers treated water to
its customers, produced primarily by the Sonoma
County Water Agency (SCWA) — approximately 65
percent in 2010. Water produced by SCWA originates
from six Ranney Collectors (or Caissons) along the
Russian River; seven production wells along the Russian
River; and three production wells along the Cotati
Aqueduct in the Santa Rosa Plain. The primary water
supply received from SCWA is supplemented and
blended with water from a series of 29 groundwater
wells located throughout the City. Prior to blending, the
water distributed from the City wells is treated with a
chlorine disinfectant to protect the community against
microbial contaminants. Combined, the City's water
system provides roughly 1.5 billion gallons of clean
drinking water every year.
Additionally, Rohnert Park has seven water storage tanks
with a total capacity of approximately 4.5 million gallons
of treated water. This source is used to balance water
system pressure during peak demand periods and also
provides for fire protection.
g www rpCiN o'rg.
assessment
of Public Health,
urce Assessment"
7 2003, which is in
State Departrn.ent
ssessment is to determine if water soi
It also includes an' inventory of',potential sources of
contamination, within the delineated: area: and provides
a determination of the water supply's susceptibility to
contamination by the identified potential sources
According to the Drinking Water Source Assessment Plan,
our water sources are most vulnerable to the following
activities: chemical /petroleum storage, pesticide /fertilizer
used -in' association with parks and golf courses (note:
� x pesticides and fertilizers are no longer used in City
,,q.
parks), transportation corridors (railroad /freeways/
highways /road right -of- ways), stormdrain discharge
points, stormwater detention facilities, agricultural
drainage, golf course ponds, high - density housing, and
utility stations (maintenance areas). If you would like
to review the plan, please feel free to contact our office
during regular business hours: (707) 588 -3300.
C�ur S-t�o�s?
If you are interested in learning more about
water quality or your water utility, please direct
your questions, concerns, or comments to the
Department of Public Works at (707) 588 - 3300.
Important Health Information
W ile your drinking water meets the federal and
ate standard for arsenic, it does contain low
levels of arsenic. The arsenic standard balances the
current understanding of arsenic's possible health
effects against the costs of removing arsenic from
drinking water. The U.S. EPA continues to research
the health effects of low levels of arsenic, which is a
mineral known to cause cancer in humans at high
concentrations and is linked to other health effects
such as skin damage and circulatory problems.
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants
in drinking water than the general population.
Immunocompromised persons such as persons with
cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have
undergone organ transplants, people with HIV /AIDS
or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and
infants may be particularly at risk from infections.
These people should seek advice about drinking
water from their health care providers. The U.S. EPA/
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk
of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial
contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking
Water Hotline at (800) 426 -4791 or http: / /water.epa.
gov /drink/hotline.
Lead in Home Plumbing
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious
health problems, especially for pregnant women and
young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily
from materials and components associated with
service lines and home plumbing. We are responsible
for providing high - quality drinking water but cannot
control the variety of materials used in plumbing
components. When your water has been sitting for
several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead
exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2
minutes before using water for drinking or cooking.
If you are concerned about lead in your water, you
may wish to have your' water tested. Information on
bead in drmkang water; testing methods, and steps
rnznxr
you can take to =nize exposure is available from
`the Safe Drinking Water:Hotline or at www.epa.gov/
Sampling Results
During the past year, we have taken hundreds of water samples in order to determine the presence of any radioactive, biological, inorganic, volatile organic, or synthetic organic
contaminants. The table below shows only those contaminants that were detected in the water. The state allows us to monitor for certain substances less than once per year because
the concentrations of these substances do not change frequently. In these cases, the most recent sample data is included along with the year in which the samples were taken.
Note: A total of 597 Total Coliform samples were taken in 2010. None of the samples tested positive.
SUBSTANCE
YEAR=.
`;' {UNIT Oi:iMl_ASURE) SAMPLEI
Arsenic (ppb)
2010
Barium (ppm)
2010
Fluoride (ppm)
2010
Haloacetic Acids' (ppb)
2010
Nitrate [as N031 (ppm)
2010
TTHMs [Total
2010
Trihalomethanes]' (ppb)
Odor - Threshold (TON)
Tap water samples;were collected for lead and
SUBSTANCE x t ;YEAR
ND -0.11
i (UNIT OF MEASURE) s�'SAMPLED
NA
. ..
Nib,
Copper (ppm) f, 2010
1.3
Lead (ppb) 2010
15
SUBSTANCE
YEAR
(l1NtT OF,MEASUREi
SAMPLED.,
Chloride (ppm)
2010
Color (Units)
2010
Copper (ppm)
2010
Corrosivity (Units)
2010
Iron (ppb)
2010
Manganese (ppb)
2010
Odor - Threshold (TON)
2010
10
0.004
5.45
3 -9.3
NA ;
NA
No
?Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from orchards; glass and electronics
NS
2.5
i ND -20
NA
<3
No
1.0
production wastes
1
2
0.01
ND -0.11
NA !
NA
No
€ Discharges of oil drilling wastes and from metal refineries; erosion of natural
11.3 -12
11.3
j 10.87 -11.90
t
1
!
(
NS
51.82
deposits
2.0
1
0.05
ND -0.19
NA j
NA
No
j Erosion of natural deposits; water additive that promotes strong teeth;
ND-41
No
3
NS
1
ND -8
0.47
jdischarge from fertilizer and aluminum factories
60
NA
4.3
3.4 -5.9
NA 1
NA
No
By- product of drinking water disinfection
45
45
10.18
ND -32
NA !
NA
No j
Runoff and leaching from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks and
f
sewage; erosion of natural deposits
80
NA
18.68
4.7 -25
17.6
9.6 -24.7
No 1
By- product of drinking water disinfection
I
analyses from sample sites throughout
?
the community _,
I
0.3 J 0.195 0/32 f No Internal corrosion of household plumbing ------
systems; erosion of natural deposits; leaching from wood
I preservatives
0.2 i 3.1 1 0/32 No j Internal corrosion of household water plumbing systems; discharges from industrial manufacturers; erosion of
natural deposits
500
NS
23.35
1 ND -83
8.15
1 5.3 -22
No
15 i
NS
2.5
i ND -20
NA
<3
No
1.0
NS
0.01
1 ND -0.132
NA
NA
No
Non - corrosive
NS
11.59
11.3 -12
11.3
j 10.87 -11.90
t
1
No
i
300
NS
51.82
t
ND -341
ND
1 ND
No
50
NS
37.56
? ND -189
3.15
ND-41
No
3
NS
1
ND -8
0.47
ND -3.2
No
Runoff /leaching from natural deposits; seawater influence
Naturally occurring organic materials
Internal corrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of
natural deposits; leaching from wood preservatives
Natural or industrially influenced balance of hydrogen,
carbon, and oxygen in the water; affected by temperature and
other factors
Leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes
Leaching from natural deposits
Naturally occurring organic materials
...�.., aissotvea aortas (PP-) 2010 ! - _ - ...�� o un _
1,000 x —r� N R off /leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes
NS 335 240 -660 150
Turbidity (NTU) 2010 130 -180 No } Runoff /leaching from natural deposits
Zinc (ppm) 2010 5 NS 1.74 0.1 -11 1.1 t 0.03 -1.1 No
5.0 NS 0.08 ND -0.29 Soil runoff
i NA NA
14 — ' No Runoff /leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes
SUBSTANCE Y
EAR
R4NGE AM f r ,..t: tgn Fair std.. 1:?
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
S AMOUNT�� OUNT �7, �'.�
AMPLED . DETECTED
Bicarbonate
ETECTED Lo4i/N' TYICLS� r �
e (PP�n) 2010 210.25 ,� CEt: , �f f, � y :��` '� � r,sty � � � •. t `e. � :� �}_
I >j -283 I10 15 95 140 NA • '` '�'
Calcium
(PP m ) 2010 35.88 19 -71 20.01
Magnesium (ppm) 2010 12 -28 Natural geology
20.13 12 -39 11.45 2.1 -17
pH (Units) Natural geology
2010 7.43 7.2 -7.6 7.6 `
Potassium (ppm) 2010 ' T34 -8.37 Measure of acidity of water
2.18 1.6 -2.5 1.31 ! ND -1.9 NA
Sodium (PP-) 2010 27 16-48 1 i
Total Alkalinity (ppm) 2010 5 69
i 8.1-44 Sodium refers to the salt present in the water and is generally naturally occurring
n' 172.36 127 -232 103.39
Total Hardness' (PPM) 2010 95 -120 NA
171 88
23 95-340 98 '
i l 40 -141 Generally found in ground and surface water
' We were required by the U:S:`EPA to conduct an evaluation of our distribution system. This is known as an Initial Distribution System Evaluation IDSE
disinfection by- product.concentrations. Disinfection by-products r distribution
HAAS and tem. Th result from continuous disinfection of drinking water and form w
source water. ( 1 and is intended to identify locations in our distribution system that have elevated
' Rohnert Park water may be considered moderately hard when determining settings for water -using appliances such as dishwashers, filters, and water when disinfectants combine with organic matter that naturally occurs in the
er softeners. =° N''
Definitions
AL (Regulatory Action Level): The concentration of a
contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other
requirements that a water system must follow.
µS /cm (microsiemens per centimeter): A unit expressing the
amount of electrical conductivity of a solution.
MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level): The highest level of a
contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs
are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as is economically and
technologically feasible. Secondary MCLs (SMCLs) are set to
protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water.
MCLG (Maximum Contaminant Level Goal): The level of a
contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or
expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by the U.S. EPA.
MRDL (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level): The highest
level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing
evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of
microbial contaminants.
1���,:'"- ..;•-• -tea „� � � � �"'f
MRDLG (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal):
The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is
no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect
the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial
contaminants.
NA: Not applicable.
ND (Not detected): Indicates that the substance was not found by
laboratory analysis.
NS: No standard.
NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units): Measurement of the
clarity, or turbidity, of water. Turbidity in excess of 5 NTU is just
noticeable to the average person.
PDWS (Primary Drinking Water Standard): MCLs and MRDLs
for contaminants that affect health, along with their monitoring
and reporting requirements and water treatment requirements.
PHG (Public Health Goal): The level of a containing
drinking water below which there is no known or ezp
health. PHGs are set by the California EPA.
ppb (parts per billion): One part substance per billion -pj
(or micrograms per liter),
"cam Ft
PPm (parts per million): One part substance per tzj,11�
water (or milligrams per liter).y
TON (Threshold Odor Number): A measuie)bf� , ,
TT (Treatment Technique): A required pro s ssr,
the level of a contaminant in drinking Ovate
_.. ,
.rte
IF
..
DRAFT MINUTES
PENDING APPROVAL
MINUTES OF THE JOINT REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
City Council
Community Development Commission
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Rohnert Park City Hall, Council Chamber
130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California
1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor Belforte called the City CounciIlCDC/RPF A joint regular meeting to order at 5 :00 p.m.
Present:
Gina Belforte, Mayor
Jake Mackenzie, Vice Mayor
Amy O. Ahanotu, Council Member
Joseph T. Callinan, Council Member
Pam Stafford, Council Member
Staff present: City Manager Gabriel Gonzalez, City Attorney Michelle Kenyon, and Deputy City
Clerk Terri Griffin.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Led by City Clerk Judy Hauff.
3. PRESENTATIONS
A. Mayor Belforte read and presented City Clerk Judy Hauff with Resolution No. 2011-47 and a
Proclamation from Assemblymember Jared Huffman honoring the occasion of her retirement.
City Clerk Hauff made brief remarks and passed her notepad and pen to Deputy City Clerk
Griffin.
4. CITY MANAGER / CITY ATTORNEY / DEPARTMENT HEAD BRIEFINGS
A. Farmers' Market, Tasty Tuesdays and Community Mural Project updates were
presented by Community Services Manager Guy Miller.
B. Recognition and Appreciation Award from Rebuilding Together Naming City of
Rohnert Park 2011 Gold Partner was presented by Housing & Redevelopment Manager
Linda Babonis.
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Belforteremoved Item No. B.1 (City BillsIDemands for Payment) and Item Nos. C.5, C.6, and
C.7 (Resolution Nos. 2011-54, 2011-55, and 2011-56) from the Consent Calendar.
A. -Approval of Minutes for:
1. City-CDC Joint Special Meeting - June 7, 2011
2. City-CDC Adjourned Joint Special Meeting - June 8, 2011
3. City-CDC-RPFA Joint Regular Meeting - June 14,2011
B. Acceptance of Reports for:
2. CDC Bills/Demands for Payment
3. City Cash/Investments Report for Month Ending May 2011
4. CDC Cash/Investments Report for Month Ending May 2011
5. RPF A Cash/Investments Report for Month Ending May 2011
C. City Council Resolutions for Adoption:
1. 2011-50 Rejecting Claim for Damages: Andrew and Rosa Sanchez
2. 2011-51 Rejecting Claim for Damages: Jeffrey Murray
3. 2011-52 Rejecting Claim for Damages: Ling Murray
4. 2011-53 Approving an - Extension of 120 Days to the Temporary Debris Box Franchise
Agreements with Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting
D. CDC Resolution for Adoption:
1. 2011-05 Approving and Adopting the CDC Budget for Fiscal Year 2011-2012
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Mackenzie/Stafford) and carried unanimously to approve the Consent
Calendar with the exception of the Item No. B.1 (City Bills/Demands for Payment) and
Item Nos. C.5, C.6, and C.7 (Resolution Nos. 2011-54, 2011-55, and 2011-56).
Items removed from Consent Calendar:
B. Acceptance of Reports for:
1. City Bills/Demands for Payment
Mayor Belforte stated she would be abstaining on this item due to a listed payment to her
business.
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Stafford/Callinan)and carried 4 - 0 - 1 (Belforte abstaining) to accept
the City Bills/Demands for Payment dated June 28, 2011.
C. City Council Resolutions for Adoption:
Mayor Be1forte thanked Council, staff and City Manager Gonzalez for their work on the budget.
5. 2011-54 Approving and Adopting the Operating Budget for the City of Rohnert Park for
Fiscal Year 2011-2012
6. 2011-55 Approving and Adopting the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Budget for Fiscal Years 2011-2012 through 2015':2016 and Approving Projects for
Fiscal Year 2011-2012
7. 2011-56 Approving and Adopting Financial Policies Regarding (1) Use of Restricted
Reserve Funds; (2) Use of Restricted Capital Reserve Funds for Infrastructure,
Facilities and Equipment and Use of General Fund Surplus; and (3) Vehicle
Replacement -
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Mackenzie/Callinan) and carried unanimously to adopt Resolution
Nos. 2011-54, 2011-55, and 2011-56.
7. FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 FUNDING FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS AND
PROGRAMS - Consideration of Fiscal Year 2011-2012Funding for City of Rohnert Park Community
Service Organizations and Programs from the City's Affordable Housing Trust Fund
A. Staff Report by Housing & Redevelopment Manager Babonis,
B. Public Comments: None
C. Resolutions for Adoption:
1. 2011-57 Authorizing and Approving an Agreement with the Committee on the Shelterless
(COTS) to Provide Management Services for the Shared Housing Program and
Authorizing the Provision of Financial Assistance from the City's Affordable
Housing Trust Fund
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Stafford/Mackenzie) and carried unanimously to adopt
Resolution No. 2011-57.
2. 2011-58 Authorizing and Approving an Agreement with Rebuilding Together Rohnert Park,
Inc. to Provide Home Rehabilitation Services for Low and Very Low Income
Homeowners in Rohnert Park and Authorizing the Provision of Financial
Assistance from the City's Affordable Housing Trust Fund
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Stafford/Mackenzie) and carried unanimously to adopt
Resolution No. 2011-58.
Mayor Belforte stated she would recuse herself from consideration of Resolution No. 2011-59
due to her position as President of SCA YD. Mayor Belforte turned the gavel over to Vice Mayor
Mackenzie to chair the meeting in her absence and left the dais at 5:41 p.m.
3. 2011-59 Authorizing and Approving an Agreement with Sonoma County Adult and Youth
Development (SCA YD)to Operate the Rohnert Park Homeless Prevention, Rental
and Deposit Assistance Program and Authorizing the Provision of Financial
Assistance from the City's Affordable Housing Trust Fund
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Stafford/Mackenzie) and carried 4-0-1 (Belforte absent/recused)
to adopt Resolution No. 2011-59.
Mayor Belforte returned to the dais at 5:48 p.m.
8. TEMPORARY DEBRIS BOX REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - Consideration of Request for
Proposals (RFP's) for Temporary Debris Box Services
A. Council Member Stafford reported on the Waste and Recycling Committee meeting and
recommended soliciting exclusive and non-exclusive Requests for Proposals for temporary debris
box services.
B. Public Comments: None
C. DIRECTION: Council concurred to direct staff to solicit Requests for Proposals f or both
exclusive and non-exclusive temporary debris box services with the assistance of R3 Consulting.
9. DEVELOPMENTSERVICESCOSTRECOVERYFEES-ANNUALREPORT
A. Staff Report presented by Management Analyst Eydie Tacata.
B. Public Comments
C. Council discussion/direction
DIRECTION: Council concurred to direct staff to provide additional information regarding the
conditions for imposition of pre-application meeting fees. Council further directed staff to
schedule a public hearing to review the proposed fee changes and seek public input prior to the
public hearing.
,
j
10. STANDING COMMITTEE/ AD HOC COMMITTEE / LIAISON REPORTS
A. Standing Committee Reports: None
B. Liaison Reports
1. Vice Mayor Mackenzie reported on the Sonoma County Transportation Authority/Regional
Climate Protection Authority (SCT A/RCP A) meeting held June 6, 2011.
C. Other Reports
1. Council Member Callinan announced a 50th Anniversary Committee meeting on June 29th
and a fundraising dance to be held in September.
2. Vice Mayor Mackenzie announced the Sister Cities Committee concert next Saturday (July
2nd) at the P~rforming Arts Center to raise funds for disaster relief in Japan.
11. COMMUNICATIONS
None.
12. MATTERS FROM/FOR COUNCIL
Mayor Belforte called attention to a question she received regarding notification to nearby residents
of spraying along the golf course fence. City Manager Gonzalez indicated he would look into the
matter.
13. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
14. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION IN CONFERENCE ROOM 2A
Mayor Belforte recessed the meeting at 6: 13 p.m. to closed session to consider:
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Government Code
~54956.9) Sierra Club and Sonoma County Conservation Action v. City of Rohnert ParklWal-
Mart Stores, Inc., Sonoma County Superior Court No. 248112
B. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government Code ~54957.6)
Agency designated representative: Gabriel Gonzalez, City Manager
Rohnert Park Employees' Association (RPEA)
Rohnert Park Public Safety Officers' Association (RPPSOA)
Service Emp.1oyees' International Union (S.E.I.D.) Local 1021
Confidential and Management Units
15. RECONVENE JOINT REGULAR MEETING OPEN SESSION IN COUNCIL CHAMBER
Mayor Belforte reconvened the meeting to open session at 8:55 p.m. All Council members were
present except Council Member Stafford.
16. MAYOR'S REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION (Government Code ~ 54957.1)
Mayor Belforte advised there was no reportable action taken in closed session.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Belforte adjourned the joint regular meeting at 8:55 p.m.
Gina Belforte, Mayor
City of Rohne~ Park
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
BILLS FOR ACCEPTANCE
Check Numbers: 199847 - 200143
Dated: June 21, 2011 :- July 06, 2011
July 12, 2011
TOTAL
$1,132,236,57
$1,132,236.57
Accounts Payable
Checks for Approval
User: ccolburn
Printed: 07 /06/2011 - 11:45 AM
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
199847
06/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Training & Ed
So Co Health Service
100.00
Check Total:
100.00
199848
06/22/2011
General Fund
Police /Training/Ed. -
Double Tree by Hilton San Dieg
567.90
Check Total:
567.90
199849
06/22/2011
General Fund
Police /Training/Ed. -
Aaron Johnson
180.00
Check Total:
180.00
199850
06/22/2011
General Fund
Police /Training/Ed. -
DALE UTECHT
180.00
Check Total:
180.00
199851
06/23/2011
General Fund
Spay/Neuter Voucher $2
Dr. Joel Reif
720.00
199851
06/23/2011
General Fund
Spay/Neuter Voucher $2
Dr. Joel Reif
670.00
Check Total:
1,390.00
199852
.06/27/2011
General Fund
Aflac Payable
AFLAC
591.36
199852
06/27/2011
General Fund
Aflac Payable
AFLAC
466.78
Check Total:
1,058.14
199853
06/27/2011
General Fund
Court Order Payable
CA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
75.00
Check Total:
75.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 1
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
199854
06/27/2011
General Fund
199855
06/27/2011
General Fund
199856
06/27/201 I
General Fund
199856
06/21/2011
General Fund
199857
06/27/2011
General Fund
199858
06/27/2011
General Fund
199859
06/27/2011
General Fund
199860
06/27/2011
General Fund
199861
06/27/2011
General Fund
199862
06/27/2011
General Fund
199863
06/27/2011
General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Emplyee Benfits /Medical Insur
HARTFORD LIFE INS
18,539.22
Check Total:
18,539.22
Blue Cross W/H Payable
HSA Bank
50.00
Check Total:
50.00
Def Comp Payable -Gw
NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATIO
1,225.00
Def Comp Payable -Gw
NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATIO
2,622.50
Check Total:
3,847.50
Def Comp Payable -Gw
NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATIO
2,415.28
Check Total:
2,415.28
Prepaid Legal Services
PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
41.85
Check Total:
41.85
Scope Dues Payable
SEIU Local 1021
1,097.86
Check Total:
1,097.86
United Way Payable
UNITED WAY
95.00
Check Total:
95.00
Eye Care/VSP/Payables
Vision Service Plan - (CA)
758.35
Check Total:
758.35
Emplyee Benfits /Eye Care
Vision Service Plan - (CA)
622.37
Check Total:
622.37
Emplyee Benfits /Eye Care
Vision Service Plan - (CA)
10.46
Check Total:
10.46
�AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 2
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
199864 06/27/2011 General Fund Non - Department /Travels & Mee US BANK 440.00
Check Total: 440.00
199865 06/29/2011 General Fund Refundable Deposits Kelly Warrender 21393
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 3
Check Total:
213.93
199866
06/29/2011
General Fund
Ref Deposit -Liab. Insur
HUB International
1,370.00
199866
06/29/2011
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
HUB International
- 280.21
199866
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Rp Community
HUB International
- 280.21
199866
06/29/2011
General Fund
Cash
HUB International
280.21
Check Total:
1,089.79
199868
06/29/2011
General Fund
Planning /Contractual S
Your Other Office, Inc.
1,391.79
Check Total:
1,391.79
199869
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Refuse - Travel/Meetings
Linda T. Babonis
5.80
Check Total:
5.80
199870
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Conservation Measures
Sandy Alarcon
37.50
Check Total:
37.50
199871
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Telephone
AT &T
28.53
Check Total:
28.53
199872
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
The Barricade Company
44.25
Check Total:
44.25
199873
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
Big O Tires
69.99
Check Total:
69.99
199874
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Professional
Caltest Analytical Laboratory
1,098.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 3
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
1,098.00
199875
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
CNH Capital
107.56
Check Total:
107.56
199876
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.. /Professional
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
867.00
Check Total:
867.00
199877
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Friedman's
107.46
199877
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Friedman's
56.16
Check Total:
163.62
199878
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Grainger, Inc.
10.85
199878
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Grainger, Inc.
50.85
Check Total:
61.70
199879
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Groeniger & Company
257.08
Check Total:
257.08
199880
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Ground Hog Construction
4,625.00
Check Total:
4,625.00
199881
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Hammonds Water Treatment Syste
4,672.00
Check Total:
4,672.00
199882
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Home Depot
160.27
199882
06/29/2.011
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Home Depot
32.55
199882
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Home Depot
151.11
199882
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.. /Cross Conn Co
Home Depot
68.61
199882
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Home Depot
203.34
Check Total:
615.88
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 4
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
199883
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Horizon Distributors Inc.
2,447.86
Check Total:
2,447.86
199884
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. Bldg/Facilty
Northgate Company, Inc.
1,200.00
199884
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. Bldg/Facilty
Northgate Company, Inc.
555.00
Check Total:
1,755.00
199885
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Pace Supply
2,620.13
Check Total:
2,620.13
199886
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
7,817.13
Check Total:
7,817.13
199887
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Miscellaneous
Powerplan
3,815.00
199887
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
Powerplan
293.78
Check Total:
4,108.78
199888
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
77.41
Check Total:
77.41
199889
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Conservation Measures
Susan Schultz
37.50
Check Total:
37.50
199890
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water /Clothing Allowance
Sunset Linen Service
55.59
Check Total:
55.59
199891
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Conservation Measures
Sandy Alarcon
37.50
Check Total:
37.50
199892
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr, /Telephone
AT &T
3030
199892
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Telephone
AT &T
15.52
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM)
Page 5
Check Number. Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM )
Page 6
Check Total:
45.82
199893
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
200.65
199893
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Spec Dept Equ
Grainger, Inc.
26.61
Check Total:
227.26
199894
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Spec. Departm
Home Depot
13.62
Check Total:
13.62
199895
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
Bldg/Facilty
Leo's Roofing, Inc.
4,679.00
Check Total:
4,679.00
199896
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
Bldg/Facilty
Northgates
1,200.00
199896
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
Bldg/Facilty
Northgates
555.00
Check Total:
1,755.00
199897
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Spec Dept Equ
Pace Supply
2.37
Check Total:
2.37
199898
06/29/2011
Uiility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
5,630.50
Check Total:
5,630.50
199899
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Miscellaneous
Pep Boys
197.91
Check Total:
197.91
199900
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Ent/Collect SystemRepair
Petersen Tractor Service, LLC
1,760.00
Check Total:
1,760.00
199901
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Laguna Plant/
City of Santa Rosa
737,184.33
Check Total:
737,184.33
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM )
Page 6
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
199902 06/29/2011 Utility Fund Sewer Entr. /Miscellaneous Santa Rosa Auto Parts 418.07
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 7
Check Total:
418.07
199903
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Water Conservation Measures
Susan Schultz
37.50
Check Total:
37.50
199904
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Ent/Collect SystemRepair
USA Blue Book
621.97
Check Total:
621.97
199905
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer /Cell Phone
Verizon Wireless
90.02
Check Total:
90.02
199906
06/29/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Contractual S
WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES
1,250.00
Check Total:
1,250.00
199907
06/29/2011
General Fund
Ps Main Station Bidg/Facilty
ABM Janitorial Services - Nort
1,624.00
199907
06/29/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Bldg/Facilty
ABM Janitorial Services - Nort
213.00
199907
06/29/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter Bldg/Facilty M
ABM Janitorial Services - Nort
583.00
Check Total:
2,420.00
199908
06/29/2011
General Fund
Pac /Production
GENE ABRAVAYA
92.60
199908
06/29/2011
General Fund
Pac /Marketing
GENE ABRAVAYA
69.90
Check Total:
162.50
199909
06/29/2011
General Fund
Finance /Contractual S
Accountemps
777.00
199909
06/29/2011
General Fund
Finance /Contractual S
Accountemps
1,346.63
Check Total:
2,123.63
199910
06/29/2011
General Fund
Fire /Spec Dept Equ
Adamson Industries Corp.
1,304.90
Check Total:
1,304.90
199911
06/29/2011
General Fund
Burt/Ave Rec Cr/Fac Maint/Non-
Air Connection
4,669.88
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 7
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
199911 . 06/29/2011 General Fund
199912 06/29/2011 General Fund
199913 06/29/2011. General Fund
199914 06/29/2011 General Fund
199915 06/29/2011 General Fund
199916 06/29/2011 General Fund
199916 06/29/2011 General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM)
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Burt/Ave Rec Cr/Fac Maint/Non-
Air Connection
1,500.00
Check Total:
6,169.88
Benecia Pool /Fac Maint/Non-
Allemand Electric Supply
383.25
Check Total:
383.25
Fire PRevention /Office
AM Printing Company
142.35
Check Total:
142.35
Dennis Amantite
165.00
Check Total:
165.00
City Hall Bldg/Facilty
Aramark Uniform Services
57.58
Check Total:
57.58
Data Processing /Telephone
AT &T
5,160.30
R.P. Gymnasium /Telephone
AT &T
22.84
Check Total:
5,183.14
Sign/Telephone
AT &T
109.72
Rec. Programs /Telephone
AT &T
14.28
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
24.74
Benecia Pool /Telephone
AT &T
15.52
Pac /Telephone
AT &T
42.72
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
159.08
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Telephone
AT &T
45.62
Publ Works Gen /Telephone
AT &T
14.28
Library /Contractual S
AT &T
29.77
Center /Telephone
AT &T
39.80
P/S Bldg -North /Telephone
AT &T
37.81
Publ Works Gen /Telephone
AT &T
15.52
Data Processing /Telephone
AT &T
184.82
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
66.13
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
- 158.90
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
-88.31
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
-88.31
Page 8
Check. Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
199917
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Telephone
AT &T
-6.29
Check Total:
458.00
199918
06/29/2011
General Fund
Data Processing/Cellular Phone
AT &T Internet Services
750.00
Check Total:
750.00
199919
06/29/2011
General Fund
Burt/Ave Rec Cr Bldg/Facilty
Automotive Appearance Speciali
1,511.74
Check Total:
1,511.74
199920
06/29/2011
General Fund
Non- Depart ment /Contractual S
BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC
8,843.75
199920
06/29/2011
General Fund
Non - Department /Contractual S
BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC
9,857.50
Check Total:
18,701.25
199921
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
Raizelah Bayen
19.50
Check Total:
19.50
199922
06/29/2011
General Fund
Data Processing /Spec. Departm
BECK COMMUNICATIONS
148.52
Check Total:
148.52
199923
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
Colette Benge
546.00
Check Total:
546.00
199924
06/29/2011
General Fund
Fire /Spec Dept Equ
BK Upholstery
175.00
Check Total:
175.00
199925
06/29/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
Pete Breeland
78.00
Check Total:
78.00
199926
06/29/2011
General Fund
ROLAND L. BRUST
9,581.40
Check Total:
9,581.40
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 9
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
199927
06/29/2011
General Fund
City Hall Annex Bldg/Facilty
Buchanan Food Service
121.94
Check Total:
121.94
199928
06/29/2011
General Fund
Ceramics Studio -Cont Svcs
Michele Carter
97.50
Check Total:
97.50
199929
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
CASCO
158.22
Check Total:.
158.22
199930
06/29/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter Fees
Brittany Cassar
95.00
199930
06/29/2011
General Fund
Animal Licenses
Brittany Cassar
12.00
Check Total:
107.00
199931
06/29/2011
General Fund
Planning /Professional
Code Source
1,030.45
Check Total:
1,030.45
199932
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Spec. Departm
Comcast
54.29
199932
06/29/2011
General Fund
Center /Spec. Departm
Comcast
42.07
Check Total:
96.36
199933
06/29/2011
General Fund
Non - Department /Advertising/P
The Community Voice
663.00
Check Total:
663.00
199934
06/29/2011
General Fund
Street Lighting /Spec. Departm
Consolidated Electrical Distri
504.97
Check Total:
504.97
199935
06/29/2011
General Fund
Brian Davis
150.00
Check Total:
150.00
199936
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
Gay Dawson
260.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 10
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
260.00
199937
06/29/2011
General Fund
Dianna Delgy
30.00
Check Total:
30.00
199938
06/29/2011
General Fund
Pac /Admin /Rent/Lease/Tax
Dell Financial Services
154.50
199938
06/29/2011
General Fund
Data Processing/Equipment Leas
Dell Financial Services
77.39
Check Total:
231:89
199939
06/29/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
Denise Drake
290.55
199939
06/29/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
Denise Drake
96.00
199939
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
Denise Drake
968.50
Check Total:
1,355.05
199940
06/29/2011
General Fund
Pac /Facility Repa
DTC Grip & Electric
485.47
Check Total:
485.47
199941
06/29/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
Eureka Oxygen Co.
538.20
Check Total:
538.20
199942
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Postage
FedEx Kinko's Office
6.01
199942
06/29/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
FedEx Kinko's Office
137.96
Check Total:
143.97
199943
06/29/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
First Choice
41.50
199943
06/29/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
First Choice
41.50
199943
06/29/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
First Choice
79.25
Check Total:
162.25
199944
06/29/2011
General Fund
Burt/Ave Rec Cr /Spec. Departm
Friedman's
14.76
Check Total:
14.76
AP - Checks for
Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM)
Page 11
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
199945 06/29/2011 General Fund
199946
06/29/2011
General Fund
199946
06/29/2011
General Fund
199946
06/29/2011
General Fund
199946
06/29/2011
General Fund
199946
06/29/2011
General Fund.
199946
06/29/2011
General Fund
199.946
06/29/2011
General Fund
199947 06/29/2011 General Fund
199947 06/29/2011 General Fund
199948 06/29/2011 General Fund
199949 06/29/2011 General Fund
199950 06/29/2011 General Fund
199950 06/29/2011 General Fund
199951 06/29/2011 General Fund
199951 06/29/2011 General Fund
199952 06/29/2011 General Fund
199952 06/29/2011 General Fund
199952 06/29/2011 General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Theodore Giesige
Check Total:
Animal Control /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
R.P. Comm. Cntr/Fac Maint/Non-
Grainger, Inc.
R.P. Gymnasium /Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Grainger, Inc.
Check Total:
Streets & Bike /Contractual S
Streets & Bike /Contractual S
Ground Hog Construction
Ground Hog Construction
Check Total:
Police /Paper Supplie
Joseph Halton, Printer
Check Total:
Codding Center / Vehicle Repai Hansel Ford
Check Total:
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control
City Hall Bldg/Facilty The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control
Check Total:
Burt/Ave Rec Cr /Spec. Departm Home Depot
Non - Department /Self - Insured Home Depot
R.P. Gymnasium /Spec. Departm . Horizon Distributors Inc.
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup Horizon Distributors Inc.
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup Horizon Distributors Inc.
Check Total:
281.41
281.41
39.97
46.12
4.14
160.14
57.60
- 100.33
94.66
302.30
2,300.00
2,300.00
4,600.00
55.05
55.05
116.81
116.81
60.00
60.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 12
120.00
17.23
170.89
188.12
17.77
27.45
363.84
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
199953
06/29/2011
General Fund
199954
06/29/2011
General Fund
199955
06/29/2011
General Fund
199956
06/29/2011
General Fund
199957
06/29/2011
General Fund
199958
06/29/2011
General Fund
199959
06/29/2011
General Fund
199960
06/29/2011
General Fund
199960
06/29/2011
General Fund
199961
06/29/2011
General Fund
199962
06/29/2011
General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 13
Check Total:
409.06
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
Honor Jackson
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
Non - Department /Self - Insured
JACOBSEN FENCE COMPANY
280.00
Check Total:
280.00
Animal Shelter Fees
Kyle Jensen
95.00
Check Total:
95.00
Sports Center /Memberships
Kathleen Jones
14.00
Check Total:
14.00
Rec Ref Clearing
Lynette Jones
68.75
Check Total:
68.75
Rec Ref Clearing
Laksavivanh Keophilaphanh
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
Sports Center /Professional
Caroline Kurema
99.00
Check Total:
99.00
Rec Ref Clearing
Deisy Lopez
400.00
Rec Ref Clearing
Deisy Lopez
- 100.00
Check Total:
300.00
Police /Travels & Mee
Rob Luis
5.00
Check Total:
5.00
Fire /Uniforms
Mallory Fire
5,143.14
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 13
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
199962 06/29/2011 General Fund
199962 06/29/2011 General Fund
199963 06/29/2011 General Fund
199964
06/29/2011
General Fund
199964
06/29/2011
General Fund
199964
06/29/2011
General Fund
199964
06/29/2011
General Fund
199964
06/29/2011
General Fund
199965 06/29/2011 General Fund
199966 06/29/2011 General Fund
199967 06/29/2011 General Fund
199968
06/29/2011
General Fund
199969
06/29/2011
General Fund
199969
06/29/2011
General Fund
199970 06/29/2011 General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Fire /Uniforms
Mallory Fire
Fire /Uniforms
Mallory Fire
Non - Department /Training & Edu
Jerrod Marshall
Sports Center /Contractual S
Martial Arts Academy
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
Martial Arts Academy
I
Sports Center /Contractual S
Martial Arts Academy
Sports Center /Contractual S
Martial Arts Academy
Sports Center /Contractual S
Martial Arts Academy
Rec Ref Clearing Nanette Metcalf
Check Total;
8,811.56
11,534.39
25,489.09
1,000.00
Check Total: 1,000.00
1,062.75
318.50
81.50
52.00
35.56
Check Total: 1,550.31
Check Total:
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm MSI Fuel Management, Inc.
Check Total:
Pac /City Events /Contractual S N2 Holdings, Inc
Check Total:
Police /Travels & Mee Nargiza Rakhimi
Check Total:
P.ubl Works Gen /Spec. Departm National Document Solutions, L
City Hall /Office Supplie National Document Solutions, L
Check Total:
JOSEPH D. NETTER
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 14
1,215.00
1,215.00
370.50
370.50
74.06
74.06
3.99
3.99
30.90
204.64
235.54
695.00
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 15
Check Total:
695.00
199971
06/29/2011
General Fund
Pers'L & Purch /Recruitment/G
North Bay Corporate Health Ser
91.00
199971
06/29/2011
General Fund
Pers'L & Purch /Recruitment/G
North Bay Corporate Health Ser
134.00
Check Total:
225.00
199972
06/29/2011
General Fund
Sean,O'Donnell
250.00
Check Total:
250.00
199973
06/29/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Office Supplie
Office Depot
27.93
Check Total:
27.93
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
192.02
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Streets &Bike /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
641.04
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
School Grounds /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
153.99
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Street Lighting /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
12,271.27
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
PW- Traffic Signals /Heat/Light
Pacific Gas & Electric
1,123.22
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
3,291.48
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Center /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
1,649.17
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Alicia Pool /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
16.41
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Benecia Pool /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
1,576.07
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Ladybug Pool /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
9.54
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
2,332.94
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
1,653.75
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
2,894.21
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Magnolia Pool /Heat/Light/Pow
Pacific Gas & Electric
874.30
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Burt/Ave Rec Cr /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
318.76
199974
06/29%2011
General Fund
Pac /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
3,562.48
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Sign/Heat Light & Power
Pacific Gas & Electric
618.29
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Heat/Light/Po
. Pacific Gas & Electric
222.13
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
City Hall Annex /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
976.73
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Non- Department /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
12.86
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter /Heat/Light/Pow
Pacific Gas & Electric
1,293.93
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
Ps Main Station /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
10,734.69
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
690.82
199974
06/29/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg -South /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
191.68
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 15
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
199975 . 06/29/2011 General Fund
199976 06/29/2011 General Fund
199977 06/29/2011 Capital Projects Fund
199978 06/29/2011 General Fund
199979 06/29/2011 General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Pac/Pasco /Production
Check Total:
Pam Enz Costuming Services
Check Total:
Del Patton
Check Total:
Southeast Dist. Specific Plan PBS &J
Check Total:
James Pekkain
Check Total:
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm Petersen Tractor Service, LLC
Check Total:
47,301.78
620.00
620.00
316.00
316.00
5,307.90
5,307.90
1,352.00
1,352.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
199980
06/29/2011
General Fund
Pac /Concessions
Petty Cash - PAC
18.21
199980
06/29/2011
General Fund
Pac /Concessions
Petty Cash - PAC
55.58
Check Total:
73.79
199981
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Petty Cash - Rec
24.00
199981
06/29/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Petty Cash - Rec
22.22
199981
06/29/2011
General Fund
Ceramics Studio /Supplies
Petty Cash - Rec
106.75
199981
06129/2011
General Fund
Ceramics Studio /Supplies
Petty Cash - Rec
40.00
Check Total:
192.97
199982
06/29/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Rent/Lease/Ta
Pitney Bowes
684.00
Check Total:
684.00
199983
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Armory
Proforce Law Enforcement
1,323.63
199983
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Armory
Proforce Law Enforcement
1,434.94
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 16
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
199984 06/29/2011 General Fund
199985 06/29/2011 General Fund
199985 06/29/2011 General Fund
199985 06/29/2011 General Fund
199986 06/29/2011 General Fund
199987 06/29/2011 General Fund
199988 06/29/2011 General Fund
199989 06/29/2011 General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil Redwood Coast Petroleum
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai Redwood Lock & Key
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm Redwood Lock & Key
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm Redwood Lock & Key
Admin Services /Contractual S Regional Government Services
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm Rohnert Park Car Wash
Publ Works Gen /Haz Materials Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.
Rec Ref Clearing Olivia Sandoval
Police Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Police Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Police Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Police Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Rec. Programs Nehicle Repair
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Police Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Codding Center / Vehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai _
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Check Total: 2,758.57
616.34
Check Total: 616.34
3.29
23.00
16.43
Check Total: 42.72
4,400.00
Check Total: 4,400.00
65.81
Check Total: 65.81
100.00
Check Total: 100.00
50.00
Check Total: 50.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 17
-67.74
-10.90
-63.18
-13.08
463.52
-10.90
7.30
34.97
37.25
6.18
17.28
33.33
-10.90
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name .
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
199990
06/29/2011
General Fund
Codding Center / Vehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
93.37
Check Total:
516.50
199991
06/29/2011
General Fund
Data Processing /Contractual S
Santa Rosa Community Media Acc
1,361.25
Check Total:
1,361.25
199992
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Uniforms
Santa Rosa. Uniform & Career Ap
126.86
199992
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Uniforms
Santa Rosa Uniform & Career Ap
118.15
199992
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Uniforms
Santa Rosa Uniform & Career Ap
65.65
199992
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Uniforms
Santa Rosa Uniform & Career Ap
12.00
Check Total:
322.66
199993
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Vehicle Repai
SCOTT SIGNS
676.50
Check Total:
676.50
199994
06/29/2011
General Fund
Benecia Pool Bldg/Facilty
Sierra Chemical Company
1,702.50
199994
06/29/2011
General Fund
H Pool Bldg/Facilty
Sierra Chemical Company
1,702.51
Check Total:
3,405.01
199995
06/29/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Sign A Rama
35.04
199995
06/29/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Sign A Rama
17.52
Check Total:
52.56
199996
06/29/2011
General Fund
Paul Skanchy
310.00
Check Total:
310.00
199997
06/29/2011
General Fund
Angela D. Smith
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
199998
06/29/2011
General Fund
S.A. Exams /Professional
So Co Health Service
1,800.00
Check Total:
1,800.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 18
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
Account Name . Vendor Name Amount
199999
06/29/2011
General Fund
Finance /Contractual S
So Co Records Management
1,108.15
Check Total:
1,108.15
200000
06/29/2011
General Fund
Codding Center /Rent/Royaltie
Theresa Strickland
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
200001
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Spec. Departm
SUN BADGE CO
43.88
Check Total:
43.88
200002
06/29/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Clothing Allo
Sunset Linen Service
106.42
Check Total:
106.42
200003
06/29/2011
General Fund
Community Event.Contracts
Dennis or Laure Tatman
2,509.88
200003
06/29/2011
General Fund
Community Event.Contracts
Dennis or Laure Tatman
192.80
Check Total:
2,702.68
200004
06/29/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Memberships
Michael Thompson
29.14
Check Total:
29.14
200005
06/29/2011
General Fund
Ceramics Studio -Cont Svcs
DENISE THURMAN
179.40
Check Total:
179.40
200006
06/29/2011
General Fund
Codding Center / Vehicle Repai
Tire Distribution Systems, Inc
310.01
Check Total:
310.01
200007
06/29/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Traction of Santa Rosa
20.21
Check Total:
20.21
200008
06/29/2011
General Fund
Codding Center /Excursions
TRAVEL WITH FRIENDS
725.00
Check Total:
725.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 19
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
200009
06/29/2011
General Fund
City Manager /Spec. Depart
Trope Group
142.50
Check Total:
142.50
200010
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Spec Dept Equ
DALE UTECHT
50.00
Check Total:
50.00
200011
06/29/2011
General Fund
Data Processing/Cellular Phone
Verizon.Wireless
90.02
200011
06/29/2011
General Fund
Fire / Cell Phone
Verizon Wireless
45.01
200011
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police / Cell Phone
Verizon Wireless
83.02
Check Total:
218.05
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North Bldg/Facilty
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
30.70
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
96.36
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
94.30
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North Bldg/Facilty
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
69.65
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Spec. Departm
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
25.54
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
Benecia Pool /Spec. Departm
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
111.92
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North Bldg/Facilty
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
29.76
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg -South Bldg/Facilty
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
16.00
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec, Dep
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
47.97
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North Bldg/Facilty
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
17.35
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg -South Bldg/Facilty
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
63.70
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
Benecia Pool /Spec. Departm
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
55.33
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Spec. Departm
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
90.24
200012
06/29/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North Bldg/Facilty
Wal -Mart Community/GEMB
19.20
Check Total:
200013 06/29/2011 General Fund PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup West Cal Tractor
200013 06/29/2011 General Fund PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup West Cal Tractor
Check Total:
200014 06/29/2011 General Fund Publ Works Gen /Vehicle Repai West County Tool & Equipment
Check Total:
768.02
559.16
88.73
647.89
41.52
41.52
200015 06/29/2011 General Fund R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S Xiomara Robles 78.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 20
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
78.00
200016
06/29/2011
General Fund
Police /Spec. Departm
Yahoo! Custodian of Records
39.50
Check Total:
39.50
200017
07/01/2011
General Fund
VINCENT AMATO
5,728.00
Check Total:
5,728.00
200018
07/01/2011
General Fund
AARON HALL
3,878.00
Check Total:
3,878.00
200019
07/01/2011
General Fund
PAUL LAWRENCE
3,740.00
Check Total:
3,740.00
200020
07/01/2011
General Fund
Court Order Payable
Cynthia Loeffler
550.00
Check Total:
550.00
200021
07/01/2011
General Fund
DANA RUGAARD
3,666.00
Check Total:
3,666.00
200022
07/05/2011
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Connie La Frankcis
29.35
200022
.07/05/2011
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Connie La Frankcis
13.17
200022
07/05/2011
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Connie La Frankcis
30.78
Check Total:
73.30
200023
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Miscellaneous
California Water Environmental
208.00
Check Total:
208.00
200024
07/06/2011
General Fund
Finance /Dues,& Subscr
California Municipal Treasurer
155.00
Check Total:
155.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM )
Page 21
Check Number Check Date Fund Name -Account Name Vendor Name Amount
200025
07/06/2011.
General Fund
Dawn Cerini
164.31
Check Total:
164.31
200026
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Spec. Departm
Comcast
66.43
Check Total:
66.43
200027
07/06/2011
General Fund
Data Processing/Equipment Leas
Dell Financial Services
1,191.92
Check Total:
1,191.92
200028
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Hall Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
1,272.00
200028
07/06/2011
General Fund
Center Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
84.00
200028
07/06/2011
General Fund
Burt/Ave Rec Cr Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
75.00
200028
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
25.00
200028
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
25.00
200028
07/06/2011
General Fund
Pac /Facility Repa
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
25.00
Check Total:
1,506.00.
200029
07/06/2011
General Fund
Data Processing /Contractual S
Granicus Inc
700.00
Check Total:
700.00
200030
07/06/2011
General Fund
H Pool Bldg/Facilty
Mike Koftinow
500.00
Check Total:
500.00
200031
07/06/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Lessons
Nancy Larbardi
55.00
Check Total:
55.00
200032
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Council /Dues & Subscr
NORTH BAY BUSINESS
141.00
200032
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Council /Dues & Subscr
NORTH BAY BUSINESS
141.00
Check Total:
282.00
200033
07/06/2011
General Fund
PW- Traffic Signals / Contractua
SONOMA -MARIN AREA RAIL
1,275.35
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM)
Page 22
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
1,275.35
200034
07/06/2011
General Fund
Police /Contractual S
TRAINING INNOVATIONS,
INC.
600.00
Check Total:
600.00
200035
07/06/2011
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
MACTEC ENGINEERING
273.25
Check Total:
273.25
200036
07/06/2011
General Fund
Animal Shltr Training Fee Dep
Diane Pawley
60.00
Check Total:
60.00
200037
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Conservation Measures
AJ Printing & Graphics, Inc.
90.68
Check Total:
90.68
200038
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water /Cell Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
395.42
Check Total:
395.42
200039
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
CNH Capital
15.84
Check Total:
15.84
200040
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Professional
FedEx
25.32
Check Total:
25.32
200041
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Grainger, Inc.
22.56
200041
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Grainger, Inc.
1,299.87
200041
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
129.64
200041
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Grainger, Inc.
33.36
200041
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Grainger, Inc.
31.49
200041
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Miscellaneous
Grainger, Inc.
339.26
Check Total:
1,856.18
200042
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Groeniger & Company
1;073.21
AP - Checks for
Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM)
Page 23
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 24
Check Total:
1,073.21
200043
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Spec. Departm
Home Depot
79.83
200043
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Spec. Departm
Home Depot
48.74
200043
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Spec. Departm
Home Depot
54.72
200043
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Spec. Departm
Home Depot
34.73
Check Total:
218.02
200044
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Spec Dept Equ
Ken Grady Company, Inc.
4,541.20
200044
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Spec Dept Equ
Ken Grady Company, Inc.
5,413.20
Check Total:
9,954.40
200045
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Office Supplie
Office Depot
348.98
200045
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Office Supplie
Office Depot
41.08
Check Total:
390.06
200046
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Spec Dept Equ
Pace Supply
1,303.44
Check. Total:
1,303.44
200047
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
34.01
Check Total:
34.01
200048
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Miscellaneous
Powerplan
2,842.78
Check Total:
2,842.78
200049
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
VEHICLE GAS
& OIL
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,236.44
Check Total:
1,236.44
200050
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Spec Dept Equ
Ryan Process Inc.
4,708.80
Check Total:
4,708.80
200051
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
/Cross Conn Co
Sacramento Flow Control
90.31
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 24
Check Number.
. Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
90.31
200052
07/06/2011
Utility Fund.
WaterNehicle Repairs
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
19.57
200052
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
47.37
Check Total:
66.94
200053
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Shamrock Materials
931.52
200053
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Shamrock Materials
96.75
Check Total:
1,028.27
200054
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water /Clothing Allowance
Sunset Linen Service
49.59
200054
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water /Clothing Allowance
Sunset Linen Service
49.59
Check Total:
99.18
200055
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Syar Industries, Inc.
270.50
200055
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Syar Industries, Inc.
271.01
200055
.07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Syar Industries, Inc.
106.75
Check Total:
648.26
200056
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
United Rentals Northwest, Inc.
110.98
Check Total:
110.98
200057
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Water Conservation Measures
AJ Printing & Graphics, Inc.
90.68
Check Total:
90.68
200058
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. Nehicle Repair
Aramark Uniform Services
29.88
Check Total:
29.88
200059 .07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Telephone
AT &T
93.78
Check Total:
93.78
200060
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer /Cell Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
157.49
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM)
Page 25
Check Number
Check Date _
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
157.49
200061
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Spec Dept Equ
Bartley Pump, In.c
4,323.49
200061
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Spec Dept Equ
Bartley Pump, In.c
2,155.20
Check Total:
6,478.69
200062
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Miscellaneous
Grainger, Inc.
2,689.43
Check Total:
2,689.43
200063
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Emr.
/Spec Dept Equ
Pace Supply
329.08
Check Total:
329.08
200064
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Emr.
/Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
216.83
Check Total:
216.83
200065
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Vehicle Repair
Power Industries
149.31
Check Total:
149.31
200066
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Vehicle Gas & Oil.
Redwood Coast Petroleum
824.28
Check Total:
824.28
200067
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Spec. Departm
Alhambra & Sierra Springs
78.03
Check Total:
78.03
200068
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Miscellaneous
Six Robblees' Inc.
343.79
Check Total:
343.79
200069
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Clothing Allow
Sunset Linen Service
20.18
200069
07/06/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Emr.
/Clothing Allow
Sunset Linen Service
20.18
Check Total: 40.36
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 26
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
200070 07/06/2011 Utility Fund
200071 07/06/2011 Utility Fund
200071 07/06/2011 Utility Fund
200072 07/06/2011 General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Sewer Entr. /Spec Dept Equ Telstar Instruments Inc.
Check Total:
Sewer Entr. /Professional Winzler & Kelly
Sewer Entr. /Professional Winzler & Kelly
Check Total:
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S All Good Driving School, Inc.
3,210.38
3,210.38
1.0,679.00
1,176.50
11,855.50
56.25
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 11:45 AM) Page 27
Check Total:
56.25
200073
07/06/2011
General Fund
Benecia Pool /Spec. Departm
American Red Cross
72.00
200073
07/06/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Spec. Departm
American Red Cross
16.00
Check Total:
88'.00
.200074
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Aramark Uniform Services
86.50
Check Total:
86.50
200075
07/06/2011
General Fund
Data Processing /Telephone
AT &T
47.13
200075
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Telephone
AT &T
30.12
200075
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Telephone
AT &T
29 77
200075
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
58.33
200075.
07/06/2011
General Fund
Data Processing /Telephone
AT &T
58.33
200075
07/06/2011
General Fund
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
60.42
200075
07%06/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter /Telephone
AT &T
29.77
200075
07/06/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg - North /Telephone
AT &T
29.15
200075
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
58.33
200075
07/06/2011
General Fund
P/S Bldg -South /Telephone
AT &T
39.29
200075
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
86.86
200075
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
188.26
Check Total:
715.76
200076
07/06/2011
General Fund
Finance /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
137.12
200076
07/06/2011
General Fund
Data Processing/Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
144.11
200076
07/06/2011
General. Fund
Ps Main Station/Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
56.62
200076
07/06/2011
General Fund
Planning /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
387.82
200076
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
230.61
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 11:45 AM) Page 27
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
2,849.56
200077
07/06/2011
General Fund
200076
07/06/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
249.60
200076
07/06/2011
General Fund
Codding Center /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
28,57
200076
07/06/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
42.67
200076
07/06/201.1
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
95.36
200076
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Manager /Cellular Phone.
AT &T MOBILITY
68.68
200076
07/06/2011
General Fund
Police / Cell Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
1,177.37
200076
07/06/2011
General Fund
Fire / Cell Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
231.03
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 28
Check Total:
2,849.56
200077
07/06/2011
General Fund
MARTIN AVILA
300.00
Check Total:
300.00
200078
07/06/2011
General Fund
Non- Department /Self-Insured
B & L Glass Company
780.38
Check Total:
780.38
200079
07/06/2011
General Fund
Benecia Pool Bldg/Facilty
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
149.31
Check Total:
149.31
200080
07/06/2011
General Fund
Dr. James E. Bruns
150.00
200080
07/06/2011
General Fund
Dr. James E. Bruns
150.00
Check Total:
300.00
200081
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Hall Annex Bldg/Facilty
Buchanan Food Service
132.15
200081
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Hall Annex Bldg/Facilty
Buchanan Food Service
113.90
Check Total:
246.05
200082
07/06/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
Jessica Bull
156.00
Check Total:
156.00
200083
07/06/2011
General Fund
City Hall Bldg/Facilty
Business Card
227,28
Check Total:
227.28
200084
07/06/2011
General Fund
Non - Department /Travels & Mee
Business Card
274,78
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 28
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
200084
07/06/2011
General Fund
200084
07/06/2011
General Fund
200084
07/06/2011
General Fund
200084
07/06/2011
General Fund
200084
07/06/2011
General Fund
200084
07/06/2011
General Fund
200084
07/06/2011
General Fund
200085 07/06/2011 General Fund
200086
07/06/2011
General Fund
200086
07/06/2011
General Fund
200086
07/06/2011
General Fund
200086
07/06/2011
General Fund
200087
07/06/2011
General Fund
200088
07/06/2011
General Fund
200089 07/06/2011 General Fund
200090
07/06/2011
General Fund
200090
07/06/2011
General Fund
200091
07/06/2011
General Fund
Account Name
Vendor Name
City Manager /Travels & Mee
Business Card
T &E - City Represesentation
Business Card
City Hall /Office Supplie
Business Card
City Hall /Spec. Departm
Business Card
City Manager /Travels & Mee
Business Card
City Council/Travel- Callinan
Business Card
T &E - City Represesentation
Business Card
Fire Prevention /Travels & Mee Business Card
VEHICLE GAS & OIL BUSINESS CARD
Data Processing /Travels & Mee BUSINESS CARD
Data Processing/Training & Edu BUSINESS CARD
Data Processing /Miscellaneous BUSINESS CARD
Police/I.D. Business Card
City Manager / Travvels & Mee
Business Card
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Business Card
Non - Department /Travels & Mee
Busniess Card
City Manager /Travels & Mee
Busniess Card
Community Event.Contracts Robert Butler
Amount
29.18
50.00
97.19
214.02
-40.00
-40.00
-40.00
Check Total:
545.17
29.55
Check Total:
29.55
49.25
959.40
350.00
4.82
Check Total:
1,363.47
345.98
Check Total:
345.98
100.00
Check Total:
100.00
581.93
Check Total:
581.93
85.10
114.65
Check Total:
199.75
500.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 29
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
200092 07/06/2011 General Fund
200093 07/06/2011 General Fund
200094 07106/2011 General Fund
200095 07/06/2011 General Fund
200096 07/06/2011 General Fund
200096 07/06/2011 General Fund
200097
07/06/2011
General Fund
200097
07/06/2011
General Fund
200097
07/06/2011
General Fund
200097
07/06/2011
General Fund
200098 07/06/2011 General Fund
200099
07/06/2011
General Fund
200099
07/06/2011
General Fund
200099
07/06/2011
General Fund
200099
07/06/2011
General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
PW- Traffic Signals /Contractua CALTRANS
SEAN CAMILLERI
Check Total: 500.00
5,837.70
Check Total:
Check Total:
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty Chem -Mark Dish Machine Service
Check Total:
City Hall /Rent/Lease/Ta CIT Technology Fin Service, In
Check Total:
Street Lighting /Spec. Departm
Street Lighting /Spec. Departm
Benecia Pool /Concession Pu
H Pool /Concession Pu
Benecia Pool /Concession Pu
H Pool /Concession Pu
City Electric Supply
City Electric Supply
Check Total:
Clover Stornetta Farms, Inc.
Clover Stornetta Farms, Inc.
Clover Stometta Farms, Inc.
Clover Stometta Farms, Inc.
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Spec. Departm Comcast
H Pool Bldg/Facilty
Benecia Pool Bldg/Facilty
Benecia Pool Bldg/Facilty
H Pool Bidg/Facilty
Check Total:
5,837.70
146.80
146.80
40.00
40.00
5,501.28
5,501.28
128.12
229.86
357.98
80.65
94.11
216.62
207.01
598.39
13.38
Check Total:. 13.38
Commerical Pool Systems, Inc. 208.01
Commerical Pool Systems, Inc. 149.00
Commerical Pool Systems, Inc. 1,242.95
Commerical Pool Systems, Inc. 502.93
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 30
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
200100 07/06/2011 General Fund
200100 07/06/2011 General Fund
200101 07/06/2011 General Fund
200101 07/06/2011 General Fund
200102 07/06/2011 General Fund
200103
07/06/2011
General Fund
200104
07/06/2011
General Fund
200104
07/06/2011
General Fund
200105 07/06/2011 General Fund
200106 07/06/2011 General Fund
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
200107
07/06/201.1
General Fund
200107
07/06/201.1
General Fund
200107
07/06/201.1
General Fund
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Check Total:
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S Gale Davis
Sports Center /Contractual S Gale Davis
Check Total:
Center Bldg/Facilty Electrical Equipment Company,
Center Bldg/Facilty Electrical Equipment Company,
Check Total:
City Manager /Spec. Depart FedEx
Rec Ref Clearing Mariela Flores
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup Gardeners Aid
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup Gardeners Aid
Rec Ref Clearing Les Goeas
Data Processing /Contractual S Government Outreach
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty Grainger, Inc.
H Pool Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
Benecia Pool Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
Ps Main Station Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
Street Lighting /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
2,102.89
276.90
159.90
436.80
-71.61
1,031.61
960.00
77.75
Check Total: 77.75
400.00
Check Total: 400.00
75.12
49.71
Check Total: 124.83
400.00
Check Total: 400.00
1,000.00
Check Total: 1,000.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 31
51.96
25.93
147.85
206.96
309.40 .
18.22
45.50
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
14.71
200113 .
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Street Lighting /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
27.64
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
153.60
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
56.51
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup
Grainger, Inc.
46.60
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter Bldg/Facilty M
Grainger, Inc.
40.95
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter Bldg/Facilty M
Grainger, Inc.
56.03
.200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter Bldg/Facilty M
Grainger, Inc.
216.32
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Spec Dept Equi
Grainger, Inc.
3.18
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
52.36
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
3.98
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Street Lighting /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
125.75
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Benecia Pool Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
120.82
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
Benecia Pool Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
19.05
200107
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
329.42
200108 07/06/2011 Capital Projects Fund
200109 07/06/2011 General Fund
200110 07/06/2011 General Fund
200111 07/06/2011 General Fund
200112 07/06/2011 General Fund
200112 07/06/2011 General Fund
Check Total:
LED Street Light Conversion
Hannibal's, Inc. Electrical Co
Check Total:
Rec Ref Clearing
Shannon Hawkins
Check Total:
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S Tomas C. Henderson
Check Total:
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S KIERSTEN HILL
Check Total:
Center Bldg/Facilty The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control
Burt/.Ave Rec Cr Bldg/Facilty The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control
Check Total:
2,058.03
2,565.00
2,565.00
62.00
62.00
180.00
180.00
39.00
39.00
60.00
60.00
120.00
200113
.07/06/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Fac Maint/Non-
Home Depot
14.71
200113 .
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Home Depot
64.40
200113
07/06/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Spec. Departm
Home Depot
92.86
200113
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Home Depot
97.80
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM)
Page 32
Check Number
Check Date
]Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
200113
07/06/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup
Home Depot
3.29
200113
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Home Depot
316.53
200113
07/06/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Bldg/Facilty
Home Depot
62.28
200113
07/06/2011
General Fund
Burt/Ave Rec Cr /Spec. Departm
Home Depot
268.74
200113
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Spec. Departm
Home Depot
49.16
Check Total:
969.77
200114
07/06/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup
Horizon Distributors Inc.
1,352.00
200114
07/06/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Horizon Distributors Inc.
245.19
200114
07/06/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Horizon Distributors Inc.
6.30
200114
07/06/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Horizon Distributors Inc.
8.00
200114
07/06/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup
Horizon Distributors Inc.
350.34
200114
07/06/2011
General Fund
Ymca/Soccer Bld/Spec. Departme
Horizon Distributors Inc.
15.22
200114
07/06/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
Horizon Distributors Inc.
169.94
200114
07/06/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Landscape Sup
Horizon Distributors Inc.
12.93
200114
07/06/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup
Horizon Distributors Inc.
110.19
Check Total:
2,270.11
200115
07/06/2011
General Fund
BARC SummerCamp /Supplies
Innovative Screen Printing
256.23
200115
07/06/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Innovative Screen Printing
473.04
Check Total
729.27
200116
07/06/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
Honor Jackson
520.00
Check Total:
520.00
200117
07/06/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Lessons
Leila Khoura
52.00
Check Total:
52.00
200118
07/06/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
Julie McIntyre
180.00
Check Total:
180.00
200119
07/06/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
Diane Micheli
76.05
Check Total:
76.05
200120
07/06/2011
General Fund
Pac /City Events /Contractual S
N2 Holdings, Inc
264.60
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 33
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
200121
07/06/2011
General Fund
200122
07/06/2011
General Fund
200123
07/06/2011
General Fund
200123
07/06/2011
General Fund
200123
07/06/2011
General Fund
200123
07/06/2011
General Fund
200123
07/06/2011
General Fund
200124
07/06/2011
General Fund
200124
07/06/2011
General Fund
200125
07/06/2011
General Fund
200126
07/06/2011
General Fund
200127
07/06/2011
General Fund
200128
07/06/2011
General Fund
200129
07/06/2011
General Fund
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM )
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Page 34
Check Total:
264.60
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
Northgate Company, Inc.
175.00
Check Total:
175.00
City Hall /Office Supplie
Office Depot
19.27
Check Total:
19.27
Park Maint /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
57.25
Non- Department /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
209.49
PW- Traffic Signals /Heat/Light
Pacific Gas & Electric
56.11
City Hall /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
69.77
City Hall /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
2,798.33
Check Total:
3,190.95
Benecia Pool /Spec. Departm
PARAGON SCREENPRINTING
547.33
H Pool /Spec. Departm
PARAGON SCREENPRINTING
547.34
Check Total:
1,094.67
Animal Shelter Fees
Diane Pawley
95.00
Check Total:
95.00
R.P. Gymnasium /Concession Pu
Pepsi -Cola
166.83
Check Total:
166.83
H Pool Bldg/Facilty
Power Industries
48.12
Check Total:
48.12
Sports Center /Contractual S
Shelby Rasmussen
140.00
Check Total:
140.00
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
143.55
Page 34
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
200129
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,347.04
200129
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,518.91
200129
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,583.60
200129
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,124.65
200129
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
542.31
Check Total:
6,260.06
200130
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Bidg/Facilty
Redwood Lock & Key
5.48
200130
07/06/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Redwood Lock & Key
3.29
Check Total:
8.77
200131
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
221.64
200131
07/06/2011
General Fund
Planning Nehicle Repair
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
14.69
Check Total:
236.33
200132
07/06/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Contractual S
Shamrock Materials
624.98
200132
07/06/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Contractual S
Shamrock Materials
557.82
Check Total:
1,182.80
200133
07/06/2011
General Fund
Mark Sharp
171.60
Check Total:
171.60
200134
07/06/2011
General Fund
BARC SummerCamp /Supplies.
Sign A Rama
355.85
Check Total:
355.85
200135
07/06/2011
General Fund
Community Event.Contracts
John Sorensen
900.00
Check Total:
900.00
200136
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Clothing Allo
Sunset Linen Service
106.42
200136
07/06/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Clothing Allo.
Sunset Linen Service
144.46
Check Total:
250.88
200137
07/06/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Tire Distribution Systems, Inc
222.36
Page 35
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM)
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
222.36
200138
07/06/2011
General Fund
Planning /Spec. Departm
Trope Group
238.19
Check Total:
238.19
200139
07/06/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
West Cal Tractor
88.73
200139
07/06/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
West Cal Tractor
200.29
Check Total:
289.02
200140
07/06/2011
General Fund
Rec Ref Clearing
Naomi Williams
175.00
Check Total:
175.00
200141
07/06/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
Mary-Rita Williamson
130.00
Check Total:
130.00
200142
07/06/2011
General Fund
Data Processing /Contractual S
Winzip Computing
308.00
Check Total:
308.00
200143
07/06/2011
Capital Projects Fund
Public Facils.Finance Plan Adm
Winzler & Kelly
2,190.00
200143
07/06/2011
Capital Projects Fund
Public Facils.Finance Plan Adm
Winzler & Kelly
954.75
200143
07/06/2011
Capital Projects Fund
Copeland Creek Bike Path Recon
Winzler & Kelly
1,151.00
Check Total:
4,295.75
Report Total: 1,132,236.57
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:45 AM) Page 36
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
BILLS FOR ACCEPTANCE
July 12, 2011
Check Numbers: 5807 - 5815 $ 227,112.36
Dated: June 29, 2011 - July 6, 2011
TOTAL $ 227,112.36
Accounts Payable
Checks for Approval
User: ccolburn
Printed: 07/06/2011 - 11:17 AM
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
5807
06/29/2011
Redevelopment General Fund
Professional Services
California Redevelopment Assoc
350.00
Check Total:
350.00
5808
06/29/2011
Redevelopment General Fund
Contractual Services
Foxtail Irrevocable Trust
2,125.30
Check Total:
2,125.30
5809
06/29/2011
Redevelopment General Fund
Contractual Services
Union Bank, N.A.
61.00
Check Total:
61.00
5810
06/29/2011
Low & Moderate Income Housing
Travels & Meetings
Linda T. Babonis
41.06
Check Total:
41.06
5811
06/29/2011
Low & Moderate Income Housing
Professional Services
California Redevelopment Assoc
350.00
Check Total:
350.00
5812
06/29/2011
Low & Moderate Income Housing
Miscellaneous
State of California
25.00
Check Total:
25.00
5813
07/06/2011
Redevelopment General Fund
Dues & Subscriptions
CALED
80.00
5813
07/06%2011
Redevelopment General Fund
Dues & Subscriptions
CALED
80.00
Check Total:
160.00
5814
07/06/2011
Redevelopment General Fund
Contractual Services
Sonoma Mountain Business Clust
222,000.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:17 AM) Page 1
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Check Total: 222,000.00
5815 07/06/2011 Redevelopment General Fund Contractual Services WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 2,000.00
Check Total: 2,000.00
Report Total: 227,112.36
AP - Checks for Approval ( 07/06/2011 - 11:17 AM) Page 2
Agenda Packet Preparation TIMEUNES' for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
· Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Robnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008~ 173
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
7/12/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 6.C.l
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-60
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
July 12,2011
Department:
Administration
Submitted By:
Submittal Date:
Gabriel A. Gonzalez, City Manager
July 7, 2011
Agenda Title:
Change in Salary Range for Economic Development Manager
Requested Council Action: Approve Resolution "Approving a Change in the Salary Range for
Economic Development Manager from94M to 98M"
Summary: At its January 25,2011 meeting, the City Council authorized the City Manager to create an
Economic Development Manager position. The position was recruited under a 94M salary
range ($42.85 ... $52.08 per hour), however, the responding candidate pool did not meet
expectations for the education and experience necessary to perform the job duties
appropriately. Staff has conducted further research and concluded that the salary range for
this position is below market to generate a pool of qualified candidates. Staff is requesting a
change from the 94M salary range to the 98M salary range ($51.96 - $63.16 per hour), which
more closely aligns with the marketplace for this type of position. The financial impact of
this adjustment will depend on the actual salary negotiated with the top candidate. The new
salary range will not exceed the total amount ($191,000) previously approved for the
Economic Development Manager and Temporary Part- Time Management Analyst.
Enclosures: Economic Development Manager Job Description
Resolution "Approving a Change in the Salary Range for Economic Development Manager from 94M
to 98M"
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: (X) Consent Item ( ) Regular Item
(X) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
Per City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item. (Revised 031309) JH:TG-S:05-b
City of Rohnert Park
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER
DEFINITION
This is an "at-will" position. Under the general direction of the City Manager, the
Economic Development Manager plans, directs, and coordinates the various functions
of economic development for the City. The incumbent initiates, forumulates, designs,
coordinates, markets, implements and monitors various development projects; analyzes
and identifies opportunities for additional growth; develops and actively implements
economic development strategies; and serves as advisor to City officials and staff,
business groups, property owners, and developers. Also performs other duties as
required. '
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
The Economic Development Manager has the direct responsibility for developing and
implementing multi-faceted economic strategies for the community, including activities
related to economic development.
SUPERVISION RECEIVED/EXERCISED
Administrative direction is provided by the City Manager. The Economic Development
Manager may be assigned to provide direct or project-based supervision of other staff to
ensure the delivery of programs and services .
ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS
(These duties are a representative sample; position assignments may vary)
. Plans, organizes, manages, and establishes priorities for the economic development
of the City; carries out the City's Economic Development Plan by setting priorities,
defining measurable goals and timelines for carrying out the specific activities
identified in the Plan, and documenting and reporting on accomplishments;
participates in the development and implementation of additional goals, objectives,
and policies to assure the economic development and financial vitality of the City.
. Coordinates and participates in the work of data collection, analysis, plan formulation
and implementation of a wide variety of economic development activities; may
assign, monitor and evaluate work performance; interprets City policies and
establishes work priorities, schedules and standards.
. Coordinates special studies and provides overall direction to the planning and review
. .
of economic development; coordinates the review process with other agencies,
divisions and City departments; prepares or oversees the preparation of staff
reports, resolutions, research reports and other materials for presentation to the City
Council, advisory bodies, and community groups or to meet state and federal
requirements. .
~
City of Rohnert Park
Economic Development Manager
Page 2 of 4 Pages
· Represents the City at public meetings and in discussions with business owners,
land owners, developers and community groups regarding economic development
activities; reviews proposals to evaluate the feasibility of proposed projects and
prepares or directs the preparation of reports, studies and recommendations.
· Develops and implements economic strategies for the community that promote
business retention and expansion, attracts new business; serves as advocate for
corporate and small business concerns, and identifies opportunities to maintain and
enhance existing business relationships with the City.
· Serves as principal City liaison on economic development activities, to local, regional
and statewide economic development and real estate organizations.
· Advises, consults, and assists in administering contracts with professional
consultants retained for economic development program planning and/or the
preparation of related studies and reports; provides direction. and oversight as
needed.
· . Develops and maintains systems and records that provide for proper documentation
of programs and financial activity.
· Monitors and reports on the progress of the City's Economic Development Plan to
the City Council, Planning Commission, special committees, and City management
team.
· Responds to a variety of inquiries and complaints received from the business
community.
· Prepares the program budget; establishes revenue goals, recommends and
manages expenditures within the budget.
· -May act as a disaster service worker in the event of a disaster or emergency.
QUALIFICATIONS
Sufficient experience, education and training in the management of complex public
organizations to perform the duties of the Economic Development Manager.
EducationfTraininq/Experience:
A typical way of obtaining the required qualifications is to possess:
· Graduation from an accredited university or college with a Bachelor's Degree in
Public Administration, Business Administration, Urban Planning, or a. related
field. A Master's Degree in Public Administration, Business Administration, or
Urban Planning is highly desireable.
· Minimum of three to five (3-S) years of increasingly responsible experience in
dealing with economic development, urban planning and financial programs.
· Possession of an lED certificate. from CALED is highly desirable.
City of Rohnert Park
Economic Development Manager
Page 3 of 4 Pages
License/Certificate:
. Possession of a Class C California driver's license by date of appointment.
Special Requirement:
. Per California State Law, smoking is not permitted inside City facilities/vehicles
or within 20 feet of main entrances, exits and operable windows.
Knowledqe of:
. Marketing, real estate development, investment planning/counseling, business
forecasting, business development, financial management
. Land disposition and development, general planning principles, state
redevelopment laws and regulations, project scheduling, and contract
administration is desirable
· Current trends in' local economic development, with specific reference to
revitalization is essential
· Practices and methods of supervision, training techniques, leadership,
organizational and operational control
Skill to:
· Operate computer software programs such as Outlook, MS Word, and Excel with
proficiency
Abilitv to:
· Analyze and interpret economic demographic and physical data pertaining to the
City and apply this information to the development of comprehensive
revitalization programs
. Possess excellent oral and written communication skills
. Learn and utilize new technology
. Meet deadlines
. Make presentations before public bodies and community organizations
. Establish and maintain effective relationships with City organizations
· Establish and maintain effective relationships with City officials, developers, civic'
groups, various agency representatives and the public
. Plan, revise and implement sound economic development programs for the City
· Exemplify an effective customer service attitude with the public; officials, and co-
workers.
Workinq Conditions:
Position requires working in a standard office environment and involves sitting,
standing, walking, reaching, twisting, turning, kneeling, bending, and squatting in the
performance of daily .activities. The position also requires grasping, repetitive hand
City of Rohnert Park
Economic Development Manager
Page 4 of 4 Pages
movement, and fine coordination in writing reports using a computer keyboard.
Additionally, the position requires near, far, and color vision in reading plans, reports,
using the computer and surveying land use areas; hearing is required when interacting
with the public and City employees. The incumbent also must be available to be called
for local emergencies, attend meetings in various other cities, work irregular or
extended hours to attend various meetings, and work with constant interruptions.
FLSA Status:
Employee Unit:
Approved By:
Date Approved:
Updated By:
Date Updated:
Exempt, At Will
Management
City Council
February 8, 2011
Gabriel A. Gonzalez, City Manager
July 7,2011
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
APPROVING A CHANGE IN THE SALARY RANGE FOR
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER
FROM 94M TO 98M
WHEREAS, an Economic Development Plan was adopted by the City Council of Rohnert Park
on August 24,2010;
WHEREAS, an Economic Development Manager will be tasked with implementing the City's
adopted Economic Development Plan and redevelopment activities;
WHEREAS, staff has developed a job description for Economic Development Manager to
appropriately reflect the current needs of the City and focus of the position;
WHEREAS, based on' a recruitment at the current salary range and staff contacts with other
organizations, it appears the salary level is inadequate to generate highly qualified candidates; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the salary for this position be adjusted and placed at the
salary range which follows:
Position
Economic Development Manager
Ranee
98M
Monthlv Salary
$9,007- $10,948
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park
approves the change in salary range for Economic Development Manager from 94M to 98M.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park this
12th day ofJuly, 2011.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
City of Rohnert Park
Council Members Quarterly Travel Expense
4th Quarter April - June 2011
Note: Expenses are reported when paid not attended
Account
Event Description
Amount
City Representation 6602
Mackenzie City Representation
Local Economic Development -Belforte hotel reimbursement
2011 Legislative Action Days-Belforte
Local Economic Development conference
2011 Economic Summit-Belforte
Stafford 6606
So County Economic Development
Noon Times Luncheon
North Bay Leadership Council
Mackenzie 6611
Mayors/ Council Members
Building Livable Communities
Noon Times Luncheon
Sustainable Enterprise conference
ABAG
Noon Times Luncheon
Mayors/ Council Members
Economic Insight conference
Noon Times Luncheon
Belforte 6612
Callinan 6613
2011 Legislative Action Days
Mayors/ Council Members
Ahanotu 6614
Mayors/ Council Members
Travel reimbursement to/from Sacramento
Mayors/ Council Members
North Coast Builders Exchange 57th Annual Dinner
7/12/2011 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO.6 D
Check Date
4/13/2011
4/20/2011
5/11/2011
5/12/2011
5/12/2011
6/30/2011
4/30/2011
5/11/2011
6/8/2011
4/13/2011
4/20/2011
4/25/2011
5/12/2011
5/12/2011
5/18/2011
6/8/2011
6/8/2011
6/8/2011
5/12/2011
6/15/2011
4/13/2011
4/30/2011
6/8/2011
6/15/2011
50.00
114.70
149.09
40.00
195.00
50.00
598.79
55.00
25.00
30.00
110.00
50.00
459.54
25.00
129.00
100.00
25.00
55.00
30.00
25.00
898.54
40.00
55.00
95.00
50.00
681.99
55.00
60.00
846.99
Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELlNES for Regular City Council Meetings
. held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization" ,
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
I Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Robnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
7/12/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO.7
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-61
CITY OF ROHNERTPARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
Department:
July 12, 2011
Development Services
Submitted By:
Submittal Date:
Patrick Barnes, Deputy City Engineer
June 27, 2011
Agenda (Subject Only) Title:
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park Approving
the Installation of a Class II Bicycle Lanes on Camino Colegio
Requested Council Action:
Staff requests Council pass a resolution approving the installation of Class II bike lanes on Camino
Colegio between Southwest Boulevard and East Cotati Avenue.
Summary: Staff is preparing plans to overlay Camino Colegio Road between Southwest Boulevard and
East Cotati Avenue.
This project provides the opportunity to restripe the existing roadway.
The roadway segment is inchlded in the City's Bicycle Master Plan as a Class II bike lane.
The roadway segment is too narrow to have parking on both sides and have Class II bicycle lanes. To
accommodate Class II bicycle lanes, parking would need to be eliminated on at least one side of the
roadway segment
Enclosures: StatIReport, Resolution
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item (X) Regular Item
(X) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
Per City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item. (Revised 031309) JH:TG-S:05-b
Staff Report
Bike Paths on Camino Coleeio
Requested Council Action:
Staff requests Council pass a resolution approving the installation of Class II bike lanes on the
Camino Colegio between Southwest Boulevard and East Cotati Avenue.
Backeround:
Staff is preparing plans to overlay Camino Colegio Road between Southwest Boulevard and East
Cotati Avenue. This project provides the opportunity to restripe the existing roadway.
The roadway segment is included in the City's Bicycle Master Plan as a Class II bike lane. A
Class II bicycle lane is a 5 foot lane dedicated to bicycles that take them out of the direct flow of
traffic. The Bicycle Master Plan was modified by City Council as late as 2008 and, in that
document, Council affirmed their direction that Camino Colegio would have Class II bike lanes.
Generally there are three north south connectors in the Bicycle Master Plan. These are,
Commerce, Snyder and the combination 'ofCamino Colegio/Country Club. The longest of these
routes is the Camino Colegio/Country Club route. Without this segrrient the route is incomplete
and cyclists may be forced on a zig-zag pattern that includes Snyder Lane, East Cotati Ave and
Southwest Boulevard as well as a number of turning movements at busy intersections. Without
this section the distance traveled by bike nearly doubles, cyclists are moved onto very busy roads
and must take left hand turns at East Cotati and Snyder, and Southwest and Snyder.
The roadway segment is too narrow to have parking on both sides and have class II bicycle lanes.
Recommendation of the Bicycle Advisory Committee
Staffmet with the BAC on April 25, 2011. The BAC was concerned that there be adequate
parking along the roadway. A couple ofthe BAC members lived either on Circle Drive or
Camino Colegio. and were familiar with the area. They did not want to create animosity among
their neighbors or the non-biking public. The BAC believed that this was an important north
south connector and that there was sufficient room to allow adequate parking on one side while
accommodating Class II Bike Lanes. They felt this would improve safety along the roadway.
Additional Community Outreach
Staff brought this issue to Council on May 24,2011 and Council dire.cted Staff to hold a public
workshop to address concerns raised at that meeting. Staff sent letters to 218 residences and the
Bicycle Advisory Committee and posted the meeting at the City Hall and on City web site.
Staff held a public workshop on June 13, 2011. The public workshop provided an opportunity to
gather information related to concerns about safety, noise, parking and other considerations.
Among the major concerns discussed were:
1. Speeding along Camino Colegio.
2. Disregard for the stop sign at Camino Colegio and Casa.
3. Site distanc:e at the exits of multifamily parking lots.
4. Proximity of parking for single family homes and the condos between Cala and Casa.
5. Bicycle safety.
After a thorough discussion of the issues and the presentation of five different scenarios, the
public was asked to vote on three possible scenarios. One alternative received over 90% of the
votes. This alternative involved installing bicycle lanes and eliminating parking on the west side
of Camino Colegio, north of Cala Way and south of Casa and eliminating parking on the east
side of Camino Colegio, north of Casa Way and south of Southwest Boulevard.
Generallyit was felt that this solution best met the needs of the residents, providing parking
where it is most needed, providing greater sight distance from multifamily parking lots,
providing safety for cyclists and providing a measure of traffic calming.
The remainder of this report discusses two major factors affecting this recommendation; parking
and safety. In addition, there is a discussion of other concerns raised by residents at the public
meeting.
Is there sufficient Parking to Eliminate Parking?
There are 48 parking spaces available on the east side of the road. There are about 44 parking
spaces available on the west side of the road. Staffhas counted parked cars several times at
different times of the day. The greatest parking level is at night. Staffhas counted a total of32
vehicles on a weekday night. A resident, John Wyman, informed us he counted 37 total vehicles
during a recent weekend. The charts below show the number of occupied and empty parking
spaces on weekday and weekend nights under four different scenarios.
I Empty
I Used
Parking Both Sid6 Parking East Side Parking West Side Alternating
P,rl<ingSothSiI"
P'rkin!Ea'tSi'"
Pariil>gW!\tSide
~t"""h~
Available Parking Weekday Nights
Available Parking Weekend Nights
At the beginning of the design process Public Safety expressed concern that ~f any parking along
Camino Colegio was removed there would be a potential that the cars would: a) park illegally, or
b) park on Circle Drive, an already heavily parked street. They expressed this concern to the
BAC.
Public Safety believes that the new configuration is the best configuration because it maintains
parking in front of the homes and multiplexes,' which should minimize the above problems.
Public Safety has stated that there may need to be a little education up front regarding parking in
the bike lane. It is hoped that our outreach work to date will work to minimize Public Safety's
effort.
Safety
The primary reason for the installation of the bicycle lane is bicycle safety. Separating cars and
bike improves safety.
Bicycle safety involves much more than striping bicycle lanes. However, studies indicate that
"cities with high levels of bicycling and good safety rates tend to have extensive infrastructure,
whereas those with low bicycling rates and poor safety records generally have done much less"
(Pucher and Dijkstra, 2003; Fietsberaad, 2006; Pucher and Buehler, 2008, Pulcher, Dill and
Handy 2010).
Records indicate that there was one injury accident along Camino Colegio during the 5 year
period from 2005 to 2010. Without Camino Colegio, the alternate route would be East Cotati to
Snyder to Southwest Boulevard. In a five year period from 2005 to 2010, there were 6 bicycle
accidents along this route. Moreover, Southwest Boulevard currently is not striped for a bike
lane in the westbound direction.
Adding the Clas~ II bicycle lanes should enhance safety in other ways that are important to the
residents along Camino Colegio:
1. Visually narrowing should slow traffic. The roadway will be narrowed by the new
striping for bicycle lanes and by increasing parking density.
2. Sight distance will be improved. On the side where parking is eliminated sight distance
will be markedly improved including at the entrances to the multifamily parking lots. On
the side with parking, moving the travel lane out 5 feet will enhance sight visibility
around the parked cars.
3. Drivers exiting cars will exit into the bicycle lane rather than the car travel lane.
Other Workshop Requests
At the public outreach Staffhas heard the following complaints and suggestions that staff stated
we would look into. In keeping our commitment to those who attended the workshop, these
items are included in this staff report as well as their disposition:
1. Can we install a blind curve sign along Camino Colegio?
a. Blind curve signs are for locations where stopping distance is less than sight
distance. This location would not meet that warrant. Moreover, with the removal
of the parking on the inside of the curve, sight distance will be improved.
2. Can we put in a flashing light at Casa?
a. As requested, the stop sign on Camino Colegio will be enhanced with a flashing
light.
\
3. Can we eliminate parking for 20 feetin front of stop signs at Casa and Camino Colegio?
a. This will be done as part of the project.
4. Can we trim shrubbery on Southwest near Camino Colegio to enhance visibility for
persons making left hand turns?
a. Public works will remove the shrubbery for about 'l1 block to enhance sight
distance in this area. This should be completed by July 12th.
5. Can we remove the tree between the two exits at 7127 Camino Colegio?
a. Public Works has informed us that this tree is private. Therefore the City cannot
take it down. The property owner could remove it.
6. Is there anything that can be done to lower traffic volumes or speeds on Camino Colegio?
a. Staffhas looked at other measures such as speed humps and concludeq that given
the configuration and use of Camino Colegio, these could create problems with
emergency vehicles or create other problems. Staff believes that the striping
changes recommended with the addition of bike lanes will provide traffic
calming, but this may not be sufficient to lower speeds to the posted 25 mph. ,
Options:
There are two choices before the Council:
1. Keep parking on both sides and designate the roadway as a Class III bikeway (bicycles
ride in traffic).
2. Add Class II bike lanes (bicycles have their own lane) to the roadway segment. This
would increase safety but result in a loss of parking spaces on Camino Colegio.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends Council pass a resolution approving the installation of bike lanes on Camino
Colegio between Southwest Boulevard and East Cotati Avenue in conformance with the bicycle
Master Plan. This would be accomplished by eliminating parking on the west side of Camino
Colegio, north of Cala Way and south of Casa and eliminating parking on the east side of
Camino Colegio, north of Casa Way and south of Southwest Boulevard to provide sufficient
width to install dedicated Class II bicycle lanes meeting State standards.
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF A CLASS II BICYCLE LANES
ON CAMINO COLEGIO BETWEEN SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD
AND EAST COTATI AVENUE
WHEREAS; the Bicycle Advisory Committee is charged with overseeing the
implementation of bicycle facilities identified in the City's General Plan and in the Bicycle
Master Plan;
WHEREAS; General Plan Policy TR-41 requires staff to ensure that bikeways are
continuous and interconnected;
WHEREAS; Class II bicycle lanes on both sides of Camino Colegio between East Cotati
Avenue and Southwest Boulevard would provide continuity between bike lanes in Camino
Colegio to the south and Country Club to the north;
WHEREAS, Class II bicycle lanes on both sides of Camino Colegio between East Cotati
Avenue and Southwest Boulevard are shown on City and County Bicycle Master Plans;
WHEREAS, the Bicycle Advisory Committee and Citizens living on Camino Colegio
met and recommended eliminating parking on the west side of Camino Colegio, north of Cala
Way and south of Casa and eliminating parking on the east side of Camino Colegio, north of
Casa Way and south of Southwest Boulevard to provide sufficient width to install dedicated
Class II bicycle lanes meeting State standards; and
WHEREAS, the elimination of parking and striping of the bicycle lanes will provide
traffic calming along this section of Camino Colegio and improve sight distance from multi-
family housing parking exits;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City ofRohnert
Park that it does hereby approve the installation of Class II bicycle lanes on Camino Colegio, .
north of East Cotati Avenue and south of Southwest Boulevard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is authorized to take all action to
ensure installation of a Class II bicycle lane on the above-referenced segment of Camino Colegio.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 12th day of july, 2011.
ATTEST:
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
City Clerk
Mayor
OAK #4850-6082-2025 v2
Griffin, Terri
Subject:
FW:,Support for Camino Colegio Bike Lanes
Distr.@ Mtg. Of:
cc:
cc:
'File:
File:
From: Sandra Lupien rmailto:SandraL@bikesonoma.orgl
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 2:28 PM
To: Belforte, Gina; blumaqazz@aol.com; Ahanotu, Amy; Callinan, Joseph; Stafford! Pam
Cc: gary@bikesonoma.orq; Barnes! Patrick .
Subject: Support for Camino Colegio Bike Lanes
Dear Mayor Belforte, Vice Mayor MacKenzie, and Council members,
Tonight, July 12, 20ll,you will hear a staff report by Deputy City Engineer Patrick Barnes in which he will recommend
Council pass a resolution to approve the installation of Class II Bicycle Lanes on Camino Colegio between Southwest
Boulevard and East Cotati Avenue. These lanes have long been in the City's Bicycle Master Plan, and the design before
you is the result of a community effort to create a solution that w'orks for everyone.
I urge you to pass the Resolution to move forward with plans to install these Class II bike lanes. You may do so with
confidence.
The presence of Class II bike lanes on Camino Colegio, a key North/South connector in Rohnert Park, will do so much to
increase the safety of bicyclists who live and work in Rohnert Park. In addition; it will make bicycling a more viable
transportation option by providing a critical safe route in Rohnert Park's bicycle network.
As you will recall, o'n May 24th, 2011, Council heard a staff report on this project. At that time, several members of the
public expressed concern over the fact that some automobile parking would need to be eliminated in order to
accommodate the bike lanes. At that meeting, Council wisely directed City Staff to hold a public workshop to address
these concerns.
I attended that meeting, hosted by the Bicycle Advisory Committee, on June 13, 2011. It was an inspiring example of a
community working together to create a solution that benefits everyone. The meeting facilitator saw to it that everyone
in attendance was able to say his or her piece. It was exciting to listen to everyone express their concerns and propose
solutions. During the meeting, it became clear that residents were, above all, concerned about safety of all road users,
and they identified a few key areas of particular concern (outlined in the Staff Report for tonight's meeting). Mr. Barnes
presented five design options, which were, based on the community's concerns, narrowed down to three. As the
meeting came to a close, the facilitator asked attendees to vote on the design option they preferred. 90% voted for the
option before you tonight.
I was among those who, in my capacity with Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition, voted for this option. It offers multiple
benefits:
1. Allows for the installation of Class II bike lanes on both sides;
2. Retains parking in the places in which it is most heavily used (and according to the parking counts, the remaining
parking is more than adequate);
3. Addresses several of the residents' safety concerns by improving visibility (especially when pulling out of
driveways on the East side of Camino Colegio); and
4. Visually narrows the roadway, which is proven to help slow down automobile traffic.
I think you'll agree that implementing this plan will benefit all those who use Camino, Colegio. Please vote in favor of
Class II Bike Lanes on Camino Colegio.
Thank you for workingto make Rohnert Park's roadways safe for all users, including those riding bicycles.
1
Yours truly,
Sandra Lupien
Development & Outreach Director
Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition
www.Bike$onoma.org
707-545-0153 (Office)
707-694-8702 (Cell)
Like SCBC on Facebook
Follow SCBC on Twitter
Check out our Safe Routes to School Program
http://www.sonomasaferoutes.org/
on Facebook
2
,r Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Robnert Park Municioal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
{This sectionfor City Clerk Use Only}
7/12/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO.8
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
July 12,2011
Department:
Administration
Submitted By:
Submittal Date:
Gabriel A. Gonzalez, City Manager
June 28, 2011
Agenda Title:
Sonoma County Solid Waste Advisory Group (SWAG) Update
Requested Council Action: Provide Feedback on Recommendations in the SWAG Research
Committee Report and SWAG's Conceptual Next Steps in the Process
Summary:
On December 8, 2009, the County Board of Supervisors approved the formation of a regional advisory
group for the express purpose of developing a long-term solid waste strategy. The purpose of the regional
advisory group (hereinafter referred to as "SWAG") is to make recommendations on solid waste system
planning and operations, such as, appropriate regional solid waste projects, priorities, schedules and
funding sources to be considered by the Member Jurisdictions. The Member Jurisdictions include:
County of Sonoma
City ofHealdsburg
City of Santa Rosa
Town of Windsor
City of Cloverdale
City ofPetaluma
City of Sebastopol
City of Cotati
City of Rohnert Park
City of Sonoma
There are eleven (II) SWAG members consisting of two (2) members of the Board of Supervisors and
one (1) City Council Member from each city in Sonoma County. Each City also has an Alternate
Representative. The City ofRohnert Park SWAG representative is Councilmember Pam Stafford and her
alternate is Mayor Gina Belforte.
In November 2010, the SWAG Research Committee ("Research Committee'') was formed. The Research
Committee's goal is to recommend a short list of options which could feasibly meet the SWAG's,
objectives for increased diversion, economic efficiency and local control. To that end, the Research
Committee has performed extensive analysis which has resulted in the following fmdings and
recommendations:
1
,..
Finding #1: The existing infrastructure for single stream recycling and construction and demolition
debris recycling ("C & D") has capacity which is currently underutilized. The waste going to landfill
disposal still contains significant quantities of the divertible materials.
Recommendation #1:
A. Increase waste reduction and diversion education through door-to-door (face-to-face
visits) outreach focused at commercial and C & D waste generators (level of effort = one
full time position).
B. Increase education efforts at schools and institutions (level of effort = one half-time
position).
C. Adopt a Model Countywide Mandatory Commercial Recycling Ordinance.
D. Adopt a Model Countywide C & D Recycling Ordinance.
Finding #2: Organics is the largest fraction of the waste stream that is still being landfill disposed. Food
waste is the largest fraction of the organic waste stream. Current infrastructure capacity does not exist to
address this volume.
Recommendation #2:
A. Support the current efforts of the Sonoma County Waste Management Agency
("SCWMA") to develop new composting capacity in Sonoma County and encourage the
facility design to include food waste composting.
B. Determine the feasibility of the Santa Rosa Laguna Wastewater Treatment Plant playing
a role in the re-use of food waste.
C. Once a full food waste diversion program is available, provide focused one-time
education outreach to generators for maximizing use.
Finding #3: Even with effective efforts to maximize use of existing single stream recycling infrastructure
in order meet higher diversion goals such as 90%, a mixed waste processing facility will likely be needed
to remove recyclables from the commercial and multi-family waste streams.
Recommendation #3:
A. Study development ofa Mixed Waste Processing Facility that targets the multi-family
and commercial waste stream.
B. Design flexibility into the system for emerging technologies.
Finding #4: In order to achieve the highest diversion goals it will be necessary to address the
remainder/composite, mixed residue and other materials within the waste, stream. Technologies such as
anaerobic digestion and thermal conversion could address this waste stream and create renewable energy.
These technologies are expensive and currently unproven in California for use with municipal solid waste
at the scale that would be required.
Recommendation #4:
A. Implement further analysis- after ftrst measuring the success of implementation of the
other measures.
B. Adopt a policy to support innovative emerging technologies that may be proposed by the
private sector within the region.
SWAG has provided a Summary of Recommendations and Cost and Diversion Impacts. Each
recommendation and the action steps associated with that 'recommendation has been assigned a cost to
ratepayers (i.e., estimated monthly residential rate impact) and an estimate ofthe potential for additional
diversion.
2
The total estimated residential monthly rate impact is $1.72. The total potential for additional diversion is
between 17% and 28%. When combined with Sonoma County's current diversion rate, the future
potential total diversion rate could be between 81 % - 92%.
SWAG is asking each jurisdiction to provide feedback to their SWAG representatives regarding the
recommendations in the SWAG Research Committee Report and the conceptual next steps in the process.
Once each City has provided feedback to their SWAG representative, the SWAG representatives will be
asked to vote on the conceptual direction. '
Staff Analysis:
Staff has reviewed the SWAG update and the following attachments:
. Execut ive Summary of the SWAG Research Committee Report (Attachment A)
. Educat ion by Garbage Franchise Agreement (Attachment B)
. Vi sion for the SWAG to Develop a Long-Term Regional Solid Waste Resource Solution
(Attachment C)
. Preliminary Scope of Consultant Analysis (Attachment D)
Staff offers the following observations based on its review:
. The Research Cominittee's methodology and reliance on reliable data substantiates their findings
and recommendations. The Research Committee:
o Defined current disposal volumes and recent trends
o Identified existing processing capacity in the County
o Evaluated waste characterization and divertibility analysis
o Reviewed existing capacity versus needs - gap analysis
o Developed program and infrastructure options for both traditional and emerging
technologies that maximize the use of existing programs and infrastructure and then
address the remaining gaps in capacity
o Developed findings and recommendations
. The use of the work of others who have performed independent research and analysis ads
substance and credibility to the Research Committee's findings. The Research Committee
reviewed a number of reports including:
o Organic Disposal Alternatives in Sonoma County report created by the,AB939 Local
Task Force (LTF)
o Sonoma County Waste Management Agency Waste Characterization Study prepared by
Cascadia Consulting Group
o Draft version of Planning for Zero Waste in Sonoma County Discussion Paper prepared
by the LTF
. The recommendation to explore and develop new types of mixed processing facilities to meet the
longer term diversion goal of 90% is relevant.
o For example, Rohnert Park has a large number of multi-family facilities that do not divert
recyclables and compostables from the waste stream due to high turnover rates, limited
space, the inconvenience of source separation and intermittent outreach.
. Increased diversion is critical to the County of Sonoma for a number of reasons, including, but
not limited to the extension of the useful life ofthe Centrallartdfill.
3
o Currently, the County of Sonoma estimates that the Central landfill will reach its capacity
by 2015.
. Food waste represents a significant percent of the remaining waste that has yet to be diverted
from the landfill. The ~esearch Committee has suitably recommended the identification and
development of a new composting facility capable of processing food waste.
o The current composting facility at the Central landfill does not have the ability to handle
food waste and will, in all likelihood, need to relocate in order to extend the useful life of
the Central landfill.
. The use of existing facilities and eco-friendly emerging technologies offers a means by which
zero waste can be achieved and GHG's ("Green House Gas Emissions") can be lowered in'
pursuit of countywide goals. Both provide tremendous benefits in terms of sustainability and the
environment.
Staff Recommendation:
Based on staff's review of the aforementioned materials, staff recommends the City Council direct its
SWAG representative to vote in favor of the conceptual direction outlined in the SWAG Research
Committee Report including the next step in the SWAG process which is to hire an independent
consultant to analyze the short list of options, which will include cost-benefit, life cycle cost, sensitivity
analysis and reliability analysis.
Next Steps:
Once the analysis is complete and staffhas access to the report, staff can perform a thorough analysis of
the impacts of the solid waste strategy to Rohnert Park residents.
Enclosures: Sonoma City/County Solid Waste Advisory Group (SWAG) Update and Attachments
SWAG PowerPoint Presentation
CITY A Tl'ORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGE:R'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item
( ) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
(X) City Comments: Provide feedback on recommendations.
(X) Regular Item
Per City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item.
(Revised 031309) JH:TG-S:05-b
4
AGENDA TITLE:
Sonoma City/County Solid Waste Advisory Group (SWAG) Update
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Accept report providing an update on SWAG activities, presenting the recommendations from
the SWAG Research Committee Report and the next steps in SWAG process. Provide
feedback on Research Report recommendations and direct jurisdiction SWAG member to vote
to proceed with a consultant study of the recommendations.
BACKGROUND:
On December 8, 2009, the County Board of Supervisors approved the formation of a regional
advisory group for the expressed purpose of developing a long-term Solid Waste strategy. On
December 17, 2009, the Board Chair sent letters to each of the City Mayors inviting their
participation and asking each Council to appoint a representative and an alternate member.
The purpose of the Sonoma County/City Solid Waste Advisory Group is to make
recommendations on solid waste system planning and operations, such as, appropriate
regional solid waste projects, priorities, schedules and funding sources to be considered by the
Member .Jurisdictions.
The first meeting of the SWAG was held on February 22,2010. The meetings are chaired by
Board Supervisor Shirlee Zane and are Co-Chaired by Councilmember John Sawyer, Santa
Rosa, and Steve Barbose, Sonoma.
The current voting members and alternatives include:
County of Sonoma - Supervisor Shirlee Zane
County of Sonoma - Supervisor David Rabbitt
City of Sonoma - Councilmember Steve Barbose, All. Mayor Laurie Gallian
City of Healdsburg - Councilmember Jim Wood, all council members serve as alternates
City of Santa Rosa - Councilmember John Sawyer, All. Gary Wysocky
City of Cetati - Vice Mayor Susan Harvey, All. Mark Landman
City of Rohriert Park - Councilmember Pam Stafford, All. Mayor Gina Belforte
City of Cloverdale - Vice Mayor Bob Cox, All. Joe Palla
Town of Windsor - Vice Mayor Deborah Fudge, All. Sam' Salmon
City of Sebastopol - Mayor Guy Wilson, All. Sarah Glade Gurney
City of Petaluma - Councilmember Tiffany Renee, All. Gabe Kearney,
In October and November of 2010, staff to the SWAG, met with all member jurisdictions to
provide them with an overview on the SWAG, results of a facilitated discussion on SWAG
goals and objectives, and a timeline of proposed future SWAG activities.
1
The purpose of this agenda item is to update the member jurisdictions on actions and activities
of the SWAG that have taken place since the prior presentation and to get feedback to bring
back to the SWAG.
DISCUSSION:
UDdate on SWAG Activities
At the November 15, 2010 SWAG meeting staff gave an update on lhe presentations to Cities
and the County on the preliminary SWAG goals and objectives. Also, the SWAG authorized
the formation of the Research Committee.
On February 28, 2011, following feedback from the jurisdictional presentations as well as
further discussion of the SWAG, the SWAG adopted the following goals and objectives:
Waste Diversion Objectives
. 80% diversion by 2015, focus on organics and education
. 90% diversion by 2020, identify how to get to 100%
. 100% diversion as a long-term goal (25-50 yrs)
Economic Efficiencies
. Develop upstream regional fee system, or other reasonable alternative which
allows for maximized diversion and minimized cost
. Reopen Central Landfill; provides revenues for regional liabilities
. New Regional Compost Facility; for increased diversion of Organics
. Central Landfill mining, may provide additional revenues
Local Control
. Evaluate different governance models
. Develop Franchise Agreements that reflect the Local (Regional) Priorities
. Identify and articulate the regional benefits of jurisdictional flow commitment
The SWAG Research Committee (RC) was directed to recommend a short list of options which
could feasibly meet the SWAG's goals and objectives. The recommendations from the
Research Committee Report, dated May11, 2011, were presented to the SWAG at their May
16, 2011 meeting and are summarized below.
SWAG Research Committee ReDort
The RC's scope of work was to recommend a short list of options which can feasibly meet
SWAG's objectives for increased diversion, economic efficiency and local control. The SWAG
focused on creating a diverse membership on the RC, with' none of the committee members
having a business interest in the outcome. That being said the RC encouraged active
participation from the stakeholders during preparation of the report. The committee
representation and the participant representation are shown below.
2
Committee Membershio
. Elected Officials
. City and County staff
. Regulatory
'. Environmental Conlmunity
. Business Community
Active Committee Particioants
. Landfill Operators
. Haulers
. Recyclers
. C&D Processors
. Composting
. Public
The RC built their recommendation on a foundation of reliable existing data. Their overall
approach was based on the consensus assumption that, it would be most cost effective to
maximize use of existing waste collection, processing and recycling infrastructure, before
recommending development of any new infrastructure. Therefore, the following steps were
used to develop their findings and recommendations:
. Define landfill waste disposal volumes & trends
. Identify existing in-county processing and diversion infrastructure capacity
. Evaluate landfill waste characterization (what types of materials make up the waste that
is still going to a landfill for disposal) and want materials are divertible (Le. can to be re-
used or recycled)
. Compare existing infrastructure capacity vs. the quantity of remaining divertible
materials in the waste stream - identify gaps
. Identify processing options to address gaps - traditional & emerging technologies
. Develop findings and recommendations to maximize use of existing infrastructure as
well as address new infrastructure needs if any.
The Executive summary of the SWAG Research Committee Report dated May 11, 2011 is
included herein as Attachment A. The full report is available on the SWAGwebpage at
htto:/Iwww.sonoma-
countv.orq/tow/odf/inteqrated waste/advisory qrouo/swaq research committee final reoort
20110511.odf. The findings and recommendations are summarized below:
Findina #1: The existing infrastructure for single stream recycling and construction and
demolition debris recycling (C & D) has capacity which is currently underutilized. The waste
going to landfill disposal still contains significant quantities of these divertible materials.
Recommendation #1:
A. Increase Waste Reduction and Diversion Education through door-to-door (face-to-face
visits) outreach focused at commercial and C&D waste generators (level of effort = one-
full time position)
B. Increase education efforts at schools and institutions (level of effort = one half-time
position)
C. Adopt a Model Countywide Mandatory Commercial Recycling Ordinance
D. Adopt a Model Countywide C & D Recycling Ordinance
It should be noted that SWAG members pointed out that in some cases face to face visits with
Commercial and Multi-family units are included in their existing franchise collection
3
agreements. Attachment B shows a summary of the current education efforts required by the
jurisdictions to be provided by their waste collector.
Finding #2: Organics is the largest fraction of the waste stream that is still being landfill
disposed. Food waste is the largest fraction of the organic waste stream. Current infrastructure
capacity does not exist to address this volume.
Recommendation #2:
A. Support the current efforts of the Sonoma County Waste Management Agency
(SCWMA) to develop new composting capacity in Sonoma County and encourage the
facility design ,to include food waste composting
B. Determine the feasibility of the Santa Rosa Laguna Wastewater Treatment Plant
playing a role in the re-use of food waste
C. Once a full food waste diversion program is available, provide focused one-time
education outreach to generators for maximizing use.
Finding #3: Even with effective efforts to maximize use of existing single stream recycling
infrastructure in order to meet higher diversion goals such as 90%, a mixed waste processing
facility will likely be needed to remove recyclables from the commercial and multi-family waste
streams.
Recommendation #3:
A. Study development of a Mixed Waste Processing Facility that targets the Multi-Family
and Commercial Waste Stream
B. Design Flexibility into the system for emerging technologies
Finding #4: In order to achieve the highest diversion goals, it will be necessary to address
the "remainder/composite", "mixed residue" and "Other" materials within the waste stream.
Technologies such as anaerobic digestion and thermal conversion could address this waste
stream and create renewable energy. These technologies are expensive and currently
unproven in California for use with municipal solid waste at the scale that would be required.
Recommendation #4:
A. Implement further analysis - after first measuring the success of implementation of the
other measures
B. Adopt a policy to support innovative emerging technologies that may be proposed by
the private sector within the region
The RC developed the cost summary included on page 7 of the Executive Summary, only as a
tool fqr the SWAG members to get a relative feel for cost/benefit of the recommended options.
The RC understands that there are different methods to achieve the recommendations. The
RC anticipated that a consultant would be hired to perform an independent analysis of the
options presented in the Research Committee Report.
Other SWAG activities that are on-aoina include:
On March 30, 2001 the County submitted application to the Regional Water Quality Control
Board, CalRecycle and the Local Enforcement Agency to permit the full development of the
4
Central Disposal Site. The regulatory agencies are reviewing the application for
"completeness" once it is deemed complete they will commence their review.
The SWAG also identified the need to form a technical advisory committee (TAC) of County
and City staff and counsel's to work on such issues as governance, system funding options,
and settlement of liabilities. The T AC has been meeting since December with the goal of
coming to consensus on some basic principles to be addressed by a settlement agreement. In
addition, the T AC has been begun working with a consultant to address funding structure
options. The TAC also recently provided an update to the SWAG on how the passage of
Proposition 26 may impact the discussions related to system funding structure.
Next SteDs in SWAG Process
In July 2010, the SWAG directed staff proceed based upon a Vision Statement that outlined
the process by which the SWAG would develop its recommendations for the long-term regional
waste solution. It is enclosed as Attachment C. Consistent with the process as outlined the
following next steps are planned.
Completion of Plannina Phase
The next step in the planning phase is to check-in with each of the jurisdictions to get feedback
on the recommendations in the SWAG Research Committee Report and the SWAG's
conceptual next steps in the process. Once each city has provided feedback to their SWAG
representative, the SWAG representatives will be asked to vote on the conceptual direction.
Analvsis Phase
With the conceptual selection of the waste diversion option(s), the' next phase will involve a
third party detailed feasibility analysis. The first step in the Analysis Phase will be to
commission a third party consultant to analyze the short list of options, which will include cost-
benefit, life cycle cost, sensitivity analysis and reliability analysis. In particular, the reliability
analysis will involve the consultant independently developing the estimated costs of the options
as well as independently estimating the diversion potential of each option. The scope of this
analysis will include analysis of full system costs, and the cost-benefit of the landfill disposal at
the Central Landfill versus out-haul of remaining waste to out-of-county landfills for disposal,
with and without the potential increases in diversion that may be accomplished under the
proposed options. A preliminary outline of the consultant's scope of work is attached at
Attachment D. This will be present to and finalized with the SWAG in the future, after they
receive the jurisdictional feedback resulting from these presentations.
The third party analysis report will be reviewed by the T AC consisting of the City and County
managers, counsel and staff, prior to being brought back to the SWAG for their consideration.
The T AC will have also completed analysis of governance options as well as a construct in
moving revenue collections upstream. Upon the completion of analysis, the TAC will be
recommending to the SWAG a waste diversion strategy, a governance model and a
methodology with schedule for moving revenue collection upstream. The SWAG will be asked
5
to select the long-term solid waste strategy with another check-in with each of the individual
jurisdictions to make sure they concur with the SWAG direction.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Executive Summary of the SWAG Research Committee Report
Attachment B - Education by Garbage Franchise Agreement
Attachment C - Vision for the SWAG to Develop a Long":Term Regional Solid Waste resource
Solution
Attachment D - Preliminary Scope of Consultant Analysis
6
ATTACHMENT A
EXECUTfVES~Y
Final Research Committee Report
For the Sonoma County/City Solid Waste
Advisory Group
The SWAG Research Committee was formed by action of the Sonoma County/City Solid Waste
Advisory Group (SWAG) on November 15, 2010. The duties or objectives outlined for the
Research Committee (Re) have been stated as:
"To recommend a short list of regional solid waste system options for SWAG
consideration which canfeasibly meet SWAG's objectives for increased diversion,
economic efficiency and local control. "
Sonoma County has done a great job of implementing recycling and waste diversion programs
that have contributed to recovering almost two thirds of the waste stream for beneficial use. The
RC's recommendations focus on options to reduce, recycle and/or process the remaining one
third of the waste stream that is still being disposed in local and regionallandf111s.
The RC at their initial meeting had a discussion and reached consensus that the research and
recommended options should focus on the following activity areas; Waste Reduction, Waste
Diversion, Education, Legislation, Enforcement, and Transfer/Processing Infrastructure.
The following report provides an overview of the work of the RC along with our findings,
recommendations and estimated costs relating to waste reduction, education, legislative,
enforcement and facility infrastructure policy options that the RC believes can feasibly meet
SWAG's objectives for increased diversion, economic efficiency and local control.
The RC wishes the reader to note that it was not within the scope of the RC's work to develop
strategies for the system funding structure. The RC was also not charged with quantifying the
impact that implementation of these recommendations may have on reducing other system costs
and meeting climate protection goals. The RC acknowledges that all of these items are
significant and will be addressed in future more detailed analysis which will be accomplished by
a third party consultant. The RC stands ready to assist with this process.
Project Approach
Th~ subcommittees' consensus included a goal of building our recommendations on a foundation
of reliable data that was either existing, or readily developable within a short time frame~ We
also agreed that it would be most appropriate to maximize the utilization of Sonoma County's
existing capacity for diversion before recommending the development of new in.fnlstructure.
The RC also incorporated the valuable work of others. Our initial steps included review of a
number of reports including the Organic Disposal Alternatives in Sonoma County report created
by the AB 939 Local Task Force, (LTF), the Sonoma County Waste Management Agency Waste
Characterization Study prepared by Cascadia Consulting-Group as well as the then current draft
version of the Planning for Zero Waste in Sonoma County Discussion Paper prepared by the
LTF.
1
From this basis the subcommittees outlined our work plan and implemented the following
general scope of work:
· Defined current disposal volumes and recent trends
. Identified existing processing capacity in the County
. Evaluated waste characterization & divertibility analysis
. Reviewed existing capacity vs. needs - gap analysis
. Developed program and infrastructure options both traditional & emerging
technologies that maximize the use of existing programs and infrastructure and then
address the remaining gaps in capacity
. Developed findings and recommendations
Presented in this Executive Summary is an overview of the research, analysis and project
approach that has led the RC to develop our specific recommendations for SWAG's
consideration.
Findinf!s and Recommendations:
Our recomm~ndations are offered as a phased approach and include suggested points in the
process where the results from initial actions can be assessed and subsequent steps can build
upon actual results from the previous accomplishments. It is important to allow for some
flexibility in the planning process, especially for the longer-term objectives to accommodate
changes in the waste stream and the evolution of emerging technologies. Our detailed
recommendations can be sUmmarized within the four following broad areas:
· Maximize the use of existing diversion facilities in the County
· Diligently pursue additional compo sting capacity for the organic fraction of the waste
stream including food waste using current technology of aerobic aerated static pile
compo sting.
· Develop new mixed waste processing capability, (resource recovery facility).
· Consider the development of emerging technologies, such as anaerobic digestion and/or
thermal conversion facilities, based on future analysis.
Existine Diversion Capacity
Finding]: The inventory of existing permitted solid waste processing facilities, (listed in Table 2
within the main body of the report), demonstrates that the County as a whole has a significant
amount ofunderutilized diversion process capacity. The categories of facilities that have the
ability to handle additional volumes of material include:
· Transfer Processing
· Construction and Demolition Debris
· Source Separated Processing facilities
In addition, the waste disposed of currently in landfills, still has a significant amount of
divertible materials that can be recovered through these types of existing facilities. The
2
combination of the composition of the waste stream matching with the capabilities of the existing
facilities in the County offers the most cost effective first opportunity to achieve additional
diversion with little or no new capital investment.
Recommendation]: Maximize Existing Capacity
As part of SWAG's work to accomplish the stated objectives of increased diversion, economic
efficiency and local control, the RC recommends the consideration of policy which emphasizes
the benefits of maximizing the use of the existing diversion infrastructure in Sonoma County.
This policy should focus on both waste reduction and diversion. The implementation of this
policy may include action by the SWAG or individual jurisdictions and should include further
study of the following options:
1A: Increase education efforts on waste reduction and diversion by funding one
full-time position with equipment and supplies for outreach materials -
specifically focused on door-to-door outreach with Commercial and C & D
waste generators.
1B: Increase ,education efforts for scbools and institutions on waste reduction and
diversion by funding one half-time position with equipment and supplies.
1e: Adopt a ModelCountywide Mandatory Commercial Recycling Ordinance
1D: Adopt a Model Countywide C & D Recycling Ordinance
Additional Compost Capacity & Food Waste
Finding 2: Organics is the largest fraction, (36%), of Sonoma County's waste stream that is still
being disposed in landfills. Food waste is part ofthe organics component and represents the
biggest volume of any single material at 21 percent of the total waste stream. Translating this to
tonnage equates to a possible range of315...... 435 tons per day of Organics being disposed. While
this represents a good opportunity for targeted diversion, current capacity does not exist to
handle this volume. The County's composting facility only has 36 tons per day of remaining
capacity. It is also important to understand that the existing method of ''wind row" composting
has limited capacity for food waste.
The Sonoma County Waste Management Agency, (SCWMA), is in the process of working
towards the development of a new composting operation that will have additional capacity in
terms of volume and possibly the ability to incorporate larger volumes and types of food waste
along with the current green waste material. New regulations relating to air impacts from
composting will necessitate a change in the method for composting in the County. While this
may present some new challenges it also represents an opportunity to incorporate a facility
design which can accommodate the beneficial reuse of food waste, the single largest component
currently going to landfill disposal.
Many communities in California are looking to address the beneficial ,use of food waste as a
diversion strategy. As our recycling programs have removed a significant percentage of other
material, food waste continues to become a larger and larger component of what is left in the
disposal stream. Santa Rosa's Laguna Wastewater Treatment Plant and its biosolids management
3
infrastructure may have the capability to playa role in the beneficial reuse of food waste here in
Sonoma County. The concept of adding a percentage of food waste in the digesters at wastewater
treatment facilities is being considered by a number of communities.
Recommendation 2: Additional Compost Capacity
The ~C recommends ~e following options be studied further to suppor:t increased diversion of
orgamcs:
2A: Support the efforts of the SCWMA to develop new compo sting capacity in
Sonoma County and specifically encourage that the new facility design
incorporate the ability to include food waste as part of the acceptable
feedstock for the composting process.
2B: Determine the feasibility of the Santa Rosa Laguna Wastewater Treatment
Plant in playing a role in the beneficial reuse of food waste in Sonoma
County.
2C: Once a full food waste diversion system is available, establish a one-time
focused educational outreach effort to inform commercial and residential
generators to ensure maximum use of the food waste and composting
programs.
New and Mixed Waste Processinf! Facilitv
Finding 3: Even with effective efforts in the areas of maximizing the use of the existing
processing infrastructure and developing additional corilposting capacity in the County, new
types .of facilities will need to be developed in order to meet the longer term 90% diversion goal
identified by SWAG. For example, while source separated recycling programs have been very
successful for single-family residents there have been some challenges to replicate the same level
of success for the multi-family and some of the commercial waste sector customers. Factors such
as the high turn-over at multifamily facilities have had an impact on customer education and
participation rates and space constraints for additional biIis have inhibited recycling opportunities
for certain sectors of the business community: One of the effective ways to recover this material
can be through the development of a mixed waste processing facility.'
By using a combination of human sorting and mechanical separation techniques based on size,
weight, magnetic separation etc. operators have looked to segregate the various components of
the waste stream for recyclables, organics and possible refuse derived fuel resources. Through
the evolution of these efforts the current sorting equipment technology has advanced
significantly. Mixed waste processing facilities can, and should be, designed for specific
applications. This is not a situation where "one size fits all". For Sonoma County, it will be
important to assess the specific needs for material recovery prior to design and implementation
of a mixed waste processing facility. This is an ,instance where it will be prudent to analyze the
results of the prior diversion efforts of the community before moving forward with a significant
capital investment. It will be critical to design a facility based on what is left in the waste stream
along with a clear understanding of the type of "feedstock" the facility will be expected to
produce from the waste material input.
4
With the understanding that the specific design will need to be developed based on the future
results of the next phase of diversion efforts in the County, it is the consensus of the RC that a
mixed waste processing facility will be a feasible component of an integrated plan to achieve
SWAG's diversion goals.
Recommendation 3: Mixed Waste Processing Facility
The RC recommends that the SWAG's policy and planning efforts include the development of a
mixed waste processing facility as a feasible option for further feasibility study and development.
Additionally, the further analysis should include designing flexibility in the facility for it to
support future emerging technologies.
3A: Develop Mixed Waste Facility that targets Multi-Family Commercial Waste
Stream
3D: Design Flexibility for Emerging Technologies
Emersmu! Technolo2V
Finding 4: As the County moves towards higher levels of diversion the remaining waste stream
will be comprised of materials that have been identified in the Cascadia Report using terms such
as; "Remainder/Composite", "Mixed Residue" and "Other". These materials by their nature will
not lend themselves to recovery through the traditioMl programs for recycling and composting.
Some of these materials can be separated through the specific design ofa mixed waste
processing facility as described previously. The current thinking in the industry related to the
remainder of the waste stream is to focus on separation of material into groups based on organics
and energy recovery potential. '
The organic fraction of the remaining material can be considered for both energy recovery and
soil amendment applications through anaerobic digestion. Other constituents like mixed non-
recyclable plastic and paper can be utilized as a high BTU feedstock for renewable energy
recovery through a variety of thermal conversion processes. The design of these emerging
thermal processes differs from traditional waste to energy combustion and has been promoted as
having low emissions and significant carbon reduction potential. These types of processes have
been developed primarily in other countries or through smaller scale projects here in the United
States. While commercial scale projects don't have a long track record in this country, the
scientific theory behind many of these emerging technologies is well founded and worth future
study and consideration as part of an integrated approach to accomplishing the higher levels of
diversion identified through the SW AG objectives.
Recommendation 4: Emerging Technologies
We recommend that the SWAG's policy and planning efforts include the consideration of
emerging technologies, such as anaerobic digestion and low emission thermal conversion, as part
a comprehensive and integrated approach to achieving the stated diversion goal objectives. Our
recommendation includes the future study of these technologies however, because of the
potential high cost of these technologies, prior to implementation a study should be completed to
measure the success. Our research identified that there are already smaller scale innovative
technologies being proposed within ,the region to address specific waste streams, the RC
5
recommends a policy to support those efforts within the community. '
4A: Implement Further Analysis
4B. Adopt a policy to support emerging technologies within the community.
Conclusions:
This report is offered to SW AG with great appreciation for the effort that is being put forth on
the part of the City and County elected representatives to come together and develop a consensus
for solid waste and diversion policy and planning measures on behalf of the Sonoma County
Community. The RC developed their recommendations with the input of a diverse range of
knowledgeable individuals representing just about every solid waste and recycling stakeholder
interest in the county. We have worked diligently to fmd the common ground that we all can
agree on. We have endeavored to offer sound public policy options regarding diversion
processing and facility development strategies for SWAG's consideration.
Beyond the written report, the work of the RC has included extensive discussion and healthy
debate of each of the presented areas. While we have suggested the need for addition study in
certain areas, we have provided SWAG with the specific recommendations for further detailed
study for which we have a high degree of confidence will represent cost effective solutions to
meet the stated objectives for diversion, economic effici€mcy and local control. To that end,
included in the full report is a summary table which attempts to quantify the range of potential
cost/rate impacts and potential additional diversion that could be achieved through
implementation of the various options.
The RC has estimated based upon our research that Recommendations #1-3 should all be able to
be implemented for less than anadditional $2.00/month impact to a typical residential collection
bill. It should be noted that this table estimates rate impacts to residential customers to
implement these waste reduction and diversion efforts, as if they are full add-ons to the existing
system costs. However, should diversion goals be achieved there will be a significant reduction
in remaining tonnage going to landfill disposal, which should result in offsetting savings. We
expect that when the consultant study is performed which takes into account all system costs,
that these potential offsetting savings will be analyzed.
6
Summary of Recommendations and Cost and Diversion Impacts
1. Maximize A. Increased Education
Existing Capacity For Commercial,
C&D, Schools &
Institutions $0.06 3%-6%
B. C&D Ordinance
C. Mandatory
Commercial Recycling
2. Additional A. Support Existing Site
Compost Selection & '
Capacity Permitting Processes
B. Determine Feasibility $0.16 6%-10%
of Food-Waste at l TP
C. Education for Food
Waste
'3. Mixed Waste A. Develop Mixed-
Processing Waste Facility
Facility Targeting Multi-
Family Commercial $1.50 4%-6%
Waste Stream
B. Design Flexibility for
Emerging
Technologies
4. Emerging A. Implement Further tbd 4%-6%
Technologies Analysis
Total Estimated
Residential $1.72
Monthly Rate
, Impact
Total Potential
for Additional 17%- 28%
Diversion
Current Diversion
Rate 64%
Future Potential
Total Diversion 81%-92%
7
ATTACHMENT B
Education by GARBAGE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
Sonoma
~
RESIDENTIAL
COMMEROAL
MULTIFAMILY (MFU) SCHOOLS
CLOVERDALE: General outreach includes newsletters 2x/year, holiday bill insert + annual visit to city buildings + information to new accounts
."".,...!............,...,.,,"".........!............",......',.,.,.......".','."..,'.'.'.,.....,.."....'.0......................,-.'.'...1,."..........;""""'.".
Redwood Required: Annual bill insert Annual bill insert Quarterly.contact
~:=I(RED) Extras: Approximately 2S visits/year Approximately 10 visits/ Presentations by request
year
C~~~~I,:, ,~~bli,~9,~~ p,~~!i~. ey~~~~ ~~~,t~,t! ,Ki.~~ ~~y~ f~,r~~r~, ~~~~~~~ ~.t~:!-, ~~":I~!~~~~ ,~~~~~~~ ~,~I,id~y' b,i!'. ~~~~~t ,~, i,~f~r~~~,~n,~o .~~~ ~,~c.~~~.t~. .. . . . . . .
Redwood Required: 40 (or MFU) visits/year 40 (or Commercial) Annual contact
Empire visitslYear
Disposal (RED) Extras: Presentations by request
HEALDSBURG: Tabling at public events, newsletters 2/year, holiday notice (counts as lof 4 req. inserts) + annual visit to city buildings +
information to new accounts '
..,...."..',..',........".....,...,..............................................."....'.,......,..."."....,....................................................
Redwood Required: Bill inserts 4/year Annual bill insert Annual bill insert Annualc()f1tact
~:~ (RED) Extras: Approximately 2S visits/year Approx. 10 visits/year ~~~~:Zid~1t~~uest
~,~~~~~~~:, ~~ea~~p,~y.~rs!,~~Ii,~~y.i~~~,.~~~!i.~~.~~ p'~~~i.~ ~y~~~ !~~.~~~~,~~P?!,~~~)~ ~~~~.~~~r~, ~y~~~ 1; ,i~t~~.~~i~ ~~, ~~,~~~~,~~~.., ,...".......,...,..
Petaluma Refuse Required: '
& Recyding Extras:
Approximately 40 visits/year
Approximately 20 visits/ Annu.alcontact/
year Presentati.ofls by request
~~~~~~r ,P~~~,:, ~,ol!d,ay' ~y'~,,~~,~I,i~,~~i~,~Y~~~, (~~~~;~~y! ,~~~~~~ ~~.~t!,~~~~~~ ~xp'o,~~~),~ !~f~!':'~~~~, ~~,~~Yf,~c~~.~~~ ,
Rohnert Park Required: 2 bill inserts/year 100 visits/year 100 visits/year
Disposal Extras:
Annual contad!
PresentatiQns bYrequ~st
~~~~~ ,~~~A,:, Yea,r1Y,o~t~ea(,h ca,'!1,p'~!~~~ (~~~~~~ ~.~,I~~~~ .~(~~~~1~ ~,~Ii~,~~ ~~~~" p~.bli~,~~ir,~~b!i~~ ,e~~~s,(~~~~.o~y! .F~~~~~~.r~~t! .~~~1. . .. .' . ., . . . . , . , "
Santa Rosa Required: '
Recyding"
Collection Extras:
Visits as requested or recommended Visits as requested or Annualcontactf
(Approximately 25 visits/year) recommended Presentations by request
~.~~~,~O,P~L,:,Pu,bl,k,~a,i~t~b~i~,~ ,(~~~~~~,r,~~p,~,,~!~.J~ .~~~~I,~~.~~, ~y~~r~,~?~i,~~Y,i~~~~ ~,i~,f~~~~~i?,~ !?, ~,e~ ?~c?,~n~~""""".",..""".".,."""""",.
Redwood Required: Annual bill insert Annual bill insert Ann~al contact
~pire I Extras: Visits as requested or recommended Preselltatiollsby requeSt
ISposa (Approximately 2S visits/year)
SONOMA: Information to new accounts
...................."..,.,...............,............,............,......",..........',.'.",,'.,,'.,.....""..... ,.,.,.......,.,......,..........,................. ..
Sonoma Garbage Required: Newsletters 2/year
Collectors Extras: Visits by request Presentations by request Presentations bytequest
~,~I,~,~~~P~~~E,D,~~EJl: ~e~~I.~~~s.?/y~a~,~?~i,~~Y,i,ns~~t :,i,~f~rlll~ti?,~,t~~~~?~~~~~~".."""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,, """"""'" """"""
RED Required: Visits by request
Sonoma Garbage Extras:
Collectors
WINDSOR: Yearly outreach campaign* (includes newsletters 2/year), holiday insert, cleanup flyers 2/year + city building visits 2x/year + information
to new accounts
..,.",............ ,...........,.....,.................,.........................,.,..........,.,.,.."...............,..,...".,.......................................
Windsor Refuse
& Recyding
PreSentations by request
Required:
Extras:
Biannual contact
Quarterly contact/
Presentations by request
*Qutreach campaigns consist of 4 projects, approved by the city. 2 are always newsletters (as they are not required by the city). The other 2 are targeted on certain
problem areas or goals. 2011 Outreach Campaigns for Santa Rosa consist of downtown focused outreach and mul.ti-family outreach with certain goals,
Windsor's campaigns are summer event recycling and green can audits/veggie waste education.
10 visits/quarter
10 visits/quarter
STAFFING: North Bay Corporation dedicates 2 staff people to serve 131,200 customers; Sonoma Garbage Collector does not have a dedicated staff person to
serve its 5,470 customers '
Date: May 25, 2011
Based upon SWAG direction July, 2010
Attachment C
VISION FOR THE SWAG TO DEVELOP A LONG-TERM
REGIONAL SOUD WASTE RESOURCE SOLUTION
March, 2010
[6-12months]
1) PHASE I-SWAG STRUCTURE, RULES OF
GOVERNANCE, GUIDING PRINCIPLES
a) SWAG Guiding Principles - already adopted as part of the
Rules of Governance
i) Local Control (Le. public vs. private ownership)
ii) Regional Services
iii) Waste Diversion
iv) Economic Efficiencies
v) Reliability
vi) Flexibility
vii) Climate Protection
b) SWAG Rules of Governance -adopted, establishing
membership, and voting
2) PHASE 2- PLANNING
a) Timelines - presented
b) Education and Awareness of Issues and Options
i) Financial Overview - Expenses and Funding Structure -
presented
ii) Facility Tours - [July and August]
iii) Presentations on Technologies and Education and
Enforcement Strategies [July through September]
c) Facilitated Discussion with SWAG of Guiding Principles to
Develop Measurable Objectives [September and/or
October SWAG Meeting]
i) Assign Priority i.e. which Principles are the most
important which are the least?
ii) Eliminate Options the SWAG is not interested in if there
are any
iii) Define Measurable Objectives for the Principles Le....
(1) What level of diversion defines success?
(2) What level of GHG reduction defines success?
[6-9 Months]
Based upon SWAG direction July, 2010
(3) What is the definition of economically efficient?
What is the range of fiscal constraint?
(4) What level of risk in technology is acceptable?
(5) Etc....
d) Full Council/Board reports to present Objectives and get~
feedback [October or November]
~.'Wh{_
f) Determine a list of acceptable Options that feasibly address
Objectives
i) Establish a Research Committee (RC) of public, industry,
business, environmental, county and city managers/staff
ii) Report results of RC analysis of feasible options back to
SWAG
g) Determine Short-list of Options to Analyze
i) SWAG discussion to reach consensus on a short list of
Options
h) Full Council/Board Reports to get Feedback on the short
list of Options [Spring 2011]
~G{_
3) PHASE 3 - ANALYSIS - DETAilED TECHNICAL
FEASIBILITY
a) Detailed third-party analysis of the short list of Feasible
Options
i) Cost-benefit
ii) Life cycle cost
iii) Sensitivity analysis - participation, generation, economy
etc.
iv) Reliability/Proven technology
b) Review and Critique of preliminary analysis by a Technical
Advisory Committee (TAC) consisting of City and County
managers, counsel, and staff
c) Finalize Analysis
d) Consider how liabilities might be addressed under each
option (on-going discussions between County and Cities -
Managers and Attorneys groups)
[2-3 months]
[6-9 months]
[ dependent
upon
solution]
Based upon SWAG direction July, 2010
4) PHASE 4 - SWAG SELECTION OF REGIONAL SOLUTION
a) Presentation of Analysis to SWAG
b) SWAG Discussion (Facilitated) to develop consensus on a
recommended regional solution
c) Full Council/Board Reports to present recommended
solution and get feedback
-
5) PHASE 5 - DEVELOP FRAMEWORK FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF REGIONAL SOLUTION
a) TAC to develop recommendations on:
i) A Governance Model- who implements? County, new
or existing JPA, private sector owner or operator?
ii) Resolution to Remaining Liabilities
Hi) A Sustainable Funding Mechanism
iv) Participation Framework (flow commitment?)
v) Implementation Process/Steps
b) Present Preliminary TAC Recommendations to SWAG for
Input
c) Full Council/Board Reports to get Feedback on
Implementation Framework
&1.,.'I:.{_
6) PHASE 6 - IMPLEMENT
Attachment D
Preliminary StODe of Consultant Analvsis
The SWAG Research Committee (RC) was directed to recommend a short list of
regional solid waste system options for SWAG consideration which can feasibly
meet the SWAG's objectives for increased waste diversion, economic efficiencies,
and local control.
The next step in the SWAG process is to have an independent consultant review
the'work of the research committee. The objectives of the third party assessment
will be to review and validate the findings and analyze each of the short list of
recommended options in the Research Committee Report. The consultant may
also recommend other action steps which feasibly can meet the SWAG's goals
and objectives. The consultant's analysis will include the following:
1. Cost/benefit - volume of waste diverted versus cost of diversion program
or infrastructure
2. life cycle cost - education programs, start-up versus on-going costs, life
cycle related to new infrastructure, including the landfill
3. Sensitivity analysis - how sensitive are the recommended options to cost
changes due to waste reduction, levels of participation of the jurisdictions,
economic conditions, regulatory changes, fuel prices, etc.
4. Reliability analysis - The reliability analysis will involve the consultant
independently developing both the estimated cost of the options as well as,
the diversion potential of each option and then estimating the reliability of
what they have done.
The consultants scope of work will include the analysis of full system costs and
the cost/benefit of the landfill disposal at the Central Landfill versus out-haul of
remaining waste to out-of-county landfills for disposal, with and without the
potential increases in diversion that may be accomplished under the proposed
options. Full system costs will be presented in terms of gate fees for the time
being, until such time as another regional system fee structure is proposed.
1
Attachment D
The consultants' scope of work will be to address:
. Education - Need to maximize participation in existing Commercial Single
Stream and Construction Demolition Debris recycling programs - Identify
best practices for educating these sectors of the waste generators to get
best cost /benefit and lasting results. Is a face to face program based upon
visits to generators the best approach? Is it best done through the Sonoma
County Waste Management Agency or Jurisdictions' Franchise Collectors?
Public employees vs. private?
. Mandatory Commercial Recycling Ordinance - Latest regulatory status?
Best practices for early implementation? Best practices related to
enforcement? Costs? Which approach is best for ordinance development a'
County wide approach or an individual jurisdiction approach?
. Construction Demolition Debris Ordinance - Best practices for
implementation? Best practices related to enforcement? Costs? Which
approach is best for ordinance development a County wide approach or an
individual Jurisdiction approach?
. Organics Infrastructure - Composting of green waste and food waste? Best
practices? Best location? Is there a role for regional treatment plant(s) to
help dispose of food waste? Cost/benefit and other considerations
. Mixed Waste Processing Facility - assess specific processing lines needed,
and include the cost/benefit, including Iifecycle and on-going operation and
maintenance costs.
. Are there additional diversion opportunities at the Regional Transfer
Stations - what could be done? What is the cost/benefit? Low tech. or
high tech programs?
. Waste Reduction Programs - Best practices to achieve actual waste
reduction, instead of dealing with the material after it is discarded. Are
there any reduction programs that have quantifiable cost/benefits?
2
. '. ,.'" ,'.' "n ""'" ',' ..' ,,' " . ',.:. ": :;' :".'-.~"<Co:-
, . ,.' , .',.,. ,.', ". .' '. --'., . - '~:', ' . ,'" '::-,
..-:..:..... ~::' :,....~'..>. ....,:.:>';- :.-< ".'.,' '.~:":":.,.':>. '::>,.:'~'. '. ,:,"",''-:-.'.:':'.:..:.'?". .>'
',', '" "'.' ;'..' ;.,' ',- --,..' '-,- ,.:.,'.' ,,'. , ,.> :.'.,.--.,.
"".:,Conceptual.SWAG'$(.",
6bjectives.'.'..-'.:Approv~d'F.'
, ". ""'_""',., -- ,:.,:,,'.,', ,,,'''',,,'''.' '''',-,'-': ,:','-'--'"
-. ,'. ,...;:-:....~'~:._.-,-,.:,~.:,,;:........' "-::":'/;~:;,,,,>,"'i''-':..'
f';)i~{;~;;"""{.;'/'.""d'
;i~!&J28;~&i~~Q --.
, "'}'" J..'?,""-'
. " :,:. . ,',;. ". .' .. '. :',' ". '.. .'. c. ~ , - '..., - ". n'. ,. : - "'. -'. , " :"': ,:' ,:' . ,..c', . .'., < ", ':'...' :
II' Waste DiversionobJebti , '" " .
" 'lIaO%diverSiofl by 2oi5)fo<?~s,~ri:'():r~CiniC~/, ','"
arid education ,',' ,',. ;/'-;."<J,"<", ,;,' "
II 90% diversion by 202()~identifYh6w;toget to
100% ".' ",i>' ' "
1110()%diversionas a long~terrngOal:{25;'50 ,".
yrs) , '. '
"","'--"""""-,'" ,,".'
',:":,'."'.,'."-, ;"".,' ,., ",
,,,".';,""','.;..,,,'.. .
" .,...-;:.:.,.',"',
1
.," '<. ,~, ,:-',> ;,:-,..,> ~_':' ."
',',;
;~:;::<~~."':;:' . ',~
'. /""
, ":';'-:,-,\-_,\,,_:-:.:L,::~<,.-:::._;
,,:<,' "':'<d'::'"
,j-an',:",
':~'1:alf:1';< .... :.,"
-;:.r~ <:-~'.~:~-', >, ~,' ':
'.-{:-',.-/~:~:-":_:
'-' '.',-"......,--..
.,' ':',.' . ~-":' '. ','.,.,;'-".:' ';~.:
."'Lo"'''c'''a'' '1'(3"'-"0'-':'::::':'" ':'... , ,'::':, ,':'
".<...., ,.' ",,~; . ~:,:,.:-,:>:~..:.,~ "..",-,::'- -':
, " '. .' .,.-';',:,;.;" '-"",,-._,'.-..
:'i1~~~;tii;~~;:~~~~{~. .
,..Identify and~a[-ticulatettieregiO'nattienefjts of '"
, jurisdiCtiorl~rtlowcommitment.? ',' ",',. '.' ' '".",' , ,,' .
2
" "":'-'><:"::'~":'_, _:',:<> ': '._',.-' , ,',' ',,::'.' ,_ .,-" ",---.,:'":.:__'.:,':"_>_'-._>,_-':,.:" .~":: ': "'<:"- -> ';' / ". \- - . :,' ',_, ,_' - c' ...:"'., '_''-.'. ,'.:,:', ,_,,_,,: -
~~~~'V~~<.7~~~~~~'~:::: ,:,.':.:',:,__,_::,,:.::,:'
w~iJ~~f~~i~:~i~:A~~6n~:
- -. . -- - '1'.'.'.'_'
:\\<~::;;,::
'::,',\.'-J.<';
..' ',,'
.>,,>":.:;:.,-','
:':>:,.~.:: :::_ :(:__):,_~.,:;:<:.::'; ':":,': -:: ,':'>.-:;;'\: - .c',' - "
'-'-'.'_:' ',-,'-;'- -
:-,:.>_:,;~:,:,:--." -"
>:":,"-,'-,";':,';
"-"""""'-<
':'':--:';:',,:".-,'
:':':-~/-:: :;. '<-:> :;;~ -~,'
.',C .- ~,_ '__: _ {_ "-.
:,-,>
;::::.';,,'..:.::"::-./:.
',_::<:i';'..".-',,'::',;_
. " -,,",_:- '.'. ~
':c':-:-:':"-.'_.';,--. _'':'_>:,_':
: " C"".;_>' .,-. .
,'.,', '-.'-',.---,'-,"::
..-,,'." '-_.-..' ,'".
::,'_-':-- '.. .: ,,:..<.::.'-".:,:,':' --i,','.':,'.":-', -;".o',~
"..- -'. .,'--'":-. ''"-' :: ..'" ,.-' ':'- '.' -'" '.>' .
-. : ..' -. .' ~~.' . ..' .'-' '~.".
" .'-,', :":":',"':,,:,-"./:.<--', '::':--'::
:. ,.".' '.- ',' '-':"":-, :',': :;"',-'-'Y:'~', '"_:::-:<
--: .:' ;-.,.._.'..-,' '::," ,<:.,'..'....--
.' ,',.',- '<" '....:.:-", -:"--:.,\".:
, --:' '< ",'."- ".- ,
. -, . ',-',.--:---:,.:,; -,,-:'-'.."
." , -- " '.".:: ':', '-."- '-", ~
"'-'.'-,,--_.-..-, '-' .', -..,
.:, .' -' .:-..'" '. : ',."
"'" '-' -, '-.' "
, .. "',' ,', '.',"':,5,,:.,,-,
.. .- - - ,'"
.':: '. ,-:,;i:::~. ,':
"",Dive'r$e.'.G()trlKritte~'.'Particip~!f<?n,::"
~~~~~~~~J,-~M-~"
,', " >"-,.i _,':.":'c;',":,': :'::"-':.","
ILActivePartiCipants; ,',,'
''':.-':' '-:., ",:,,,'.-:,. ".-..:,-....:.-'.,-".-..:'--' ,"
.','.'. ':,'ilLandfili()perators
.. Haulers .
l1li Business Community
6
3
_.c"." "'_'0-' .' ".:/_,-,-,.'_,', ,._'-.:./
,.-'>,.;' ,,'
~~\~f()ject Appro~G..
~~1~~~~~~::~~~~~: ·
'\j,,: Evaluate wastecharac '
... \ct~pacity VS. ne~ds~g.t
f'tify.processi~gop~i'"
,;.~~rging te~h~~I?~i~,
'.gdingsand re,cqmrrien,
::'.'" > :;.::,;~':~
',"
,.;..,
"'.<_-..;",-:C:";.'
.' :0.,:.,: .___".' :---'_>-",:.' '.;.c:'
.... ',:-. .:..:- ':"'-':'-':":'_::'-";,:"':,
'., ',- ""-_,0',___"':"':
>-' :: :..:':>': ,,-.;>:~, -/::,,:::,j ,"../':......:. ,-;:
, ",,-.; - -" :'::;""";"/ .' :.::;i\,:,:,;~';:\:';::.>i-:':';,:':Y_i_>'.:";':; .. ,'<.~,::.:
..:.'-......
""-':'.'-',-,-':'.'
''''--''.''''-''-';
" ",7)',
~-'>:::';.:'i>~~i(;.~t<:'_ :,',"':,-- '- ,_::,:.;-"'" '-...." -- ',"'-l,;:;:;-:',,:':<,;:':'./,
'.'.,';$':,...,' 'C""tY'.;'.~,::
t~. ~~~taW:~~;St~ean#
'." ->:';':.;'....,:'c' ~,-,'.; .'
4
;7
_Future Capacity
ing permit)
.Currently Available
paeily
TransferlProeessing Recycling/CDI
Facilities & Landfill
Compost Facilities Recycling - Source
Separated Only
.CurrentAclual
Average Daily
Throughput
10
5
Material Type
Organics
C&D
Paper
Plastic
Metal
Mixed Residue
Glass
Special Waste
Hazardous & E-Waste
Total Waste Stream
Percent
36.3%
27.4%
16.3%
7.4%
3.9%
3.1 %
2.6%
1.7%
1.4%
100%
Tonnage Range- Tons per Day
315-435
237 - 329
141-195
64 - 89
34-47
27 - 37
22 - 31
15-20
12-17
867 -1200
12,
6
. .,' .
. . :"'.,". -"'-<':",:-:'-,-:
'- " '., -:., - ',', . ,'" -'-.
. ,'- '-- --- ,,- - ""-.., .
.:. ,,' '. '. ,'.' ','-' " .- .'.',' ---" ,',- "....-..' ':"","",;
,. ,Findings' & Recommsndations> , "
. - ' . ',- ".' . .
. '.', --,"; -'......--.-,.-..
{,."', -,- ---',,' ".
-.' . .
,,,'. ,',.-' ---,,--,,:",:.---'.:
. . -, '.~. '-"
.' Finding' #1 ': Th~e)(istin~ir1frastruCt~re 'forsil1~le <"
." ;,.. ,~": "
'.'streamrecycling and constr,uctiooCind. , ".. ' '"., '.. ',. .." ',,' .." .
'.. ,. (jeO'lolition debrisrecycling(C& p) tlasdap~city,i.'
Vlhichi~ currently. underlJtilized~Th~ waste"?: < ".,".
" ,,',.Ri~pOS~d'oj .stiil;cdntainsSignificahf.Quantilies of,.,...
,.thesedivertible;niaterials~' . " '.'. ','.' ,,'0'> '.
. \:,:'-':'
"-'-:,':,,"':.::-,\," :
',-."-_..,:.:..-,..",.:."_:,:..';,,
">';;"'-''-',,: >;-:, ~':'(,,:; -:: ':,','
., ,~.
';:_.;,'. .,'" :-':' -' :,~.-.<' ;-
.."/..13..'.
- - 'n --"_ ". '" _' -- .,' _ '. :: . . - -...., :_' . - :'. -. .... _ ~
'.".Findings..&.. R~9omrnendati()n.~.'
-. ., _.. ,_'_'_'. "', _n .'., _,' '_ ,'___ _'..
". '-', " ',' ',' ",,'" -- ,.: .':;-: ,:'-:- ',.
...,"'Reconll11el'ldatiOn.#1.:>.. '
.'A.....I.nCrefls~.'WastEiBe.ductip~..~Ad .,.[)iV~rSi'~rl.,.Eq~c~ti()r1.",',.............'..,...
.,thr()ughdoor~to-do()r'outreflch focU~datconul1~rciaL ,'. "
,andC&Dwaste generators (level. ofe~ort = ()OE)..fun ....,"...,
timeposition) ,. ,."" ;., " " , ", ',,' ,.., .,'.',
'f3.lncrease education efforts at schools and institutions
(level of ,effort = one half,.tirhe position)"
G. Adopt a Model Countywide Mandatory Commercial: ' '
Recycling Ordinance
D.Adopta ModeLCountywideC &0 Recycling Qrdina.nce
7
':,'," ,-:>':-- :-:".
~,':, "':'.: ::",':.:.::'-<,--....:.. .,,',:>~
',-- - ',," ,'.' '---:
~ :' - : ' ..: --: ~ '. .' ,- ' ",
'-"- '-"-,",---':,;""','
,,' Fingings &Recommend~tip;9;~:Fi
".",,'~indil1g#2:,: Organics' is. t~elargest~!r~6tib:;;1~;:"'"
, the waste str~amt~~tis.stii(beingla.~. .,' . '.',;,,'. ,'".
." disposed. Food waste. is the'largestfrac~i~h)~f>.;
, ';:thi~orgarliCwastest;ea~.Current < .., ..'. ..' .,.,,:;:::;.;.
, - _'" '_ ~': '::, '.__~,,: -,_:. :'__ -:_',:: '.): '.~, ','. ' :. -,- . " '. - ,'. , '." .','. .,~;: -, -' .- '. ,'-"'c' <'" ':,,~,,)~:",\"<:-','_:: _;,.
",,';. ',. infrastructure cap.adty doesn;otexistt<!;aqqt~ss.;
.::: ~'" .:~ ":':-:-:',:: _:,':"::;::',::',,:.-- ,- :.><---.-'. .::':': /- -- ',;, .-,>.:.-,.:" -: "', ',,',:;\, ,,':'....'.. ,,-, ";-"-"'".. .
"'.."'thisvoILJme. '".".,.,,'.:. ;,:
",;:::;?'/X:{;,-:-:>~<:::
~ '''>'L;:\'>''
'.-",' ,'." -, ",'.
. .., ~." ". ,-',,-", /,,- ""'- ',' .-,,~;' "'-
'.' ,- -,"'-,'-.
:_',"-,-,:".'.-",.:.;.^:. ,"'.
"-" -,', - ,,--.-,,^
:.. '. . -.-.' -:' '- '" .: ;- .- :' - '. .. : ' .:: '.:~:,
'.c, __ _. .__ ' .'
, .. --,- -,,--,-,..,-,-,--, ."
'. " - ,,,'
'.' .,,"--: "'",'
r, ':,::' _, :__::. ,_' ':': :" _' __~': _~-~':'
~ . '. ", .- :'''''~ :::~~' /:
.,,'.,.,15
^ .' '-:. <.:, '~',:~~ ,',:,:,::<:':: ,<,)',~.-:'>'-::-y>:,::-;:.~::':;: -) ,:::,-;:;~"-'
',,' ",'" -'" --",'" ,,-"- "",'
,;,-:.,:>:_::--",::,,:,'.,'.-.-":','.,:<:::;.':::-:-..'.,,/';'-"'.,::::'-
. '-'-,<:---p.:..:':,:.-.-.' ,",."'-,.-:--,::--.:'_'''..>',-::,.
'. -.. . ": ::--":,:,.:: ",_::'-:.:.',':;.'.~:,';'_:>',:,
.:" ,'- - ,'--" -,' . ....
,',-",'- , ",:,,". '.:--'. ,'.",,': - ;,', .- .-,
',\ - -:_ _' :': - ..' _.', " ": , ::_: '_ ' '::" i:\.':.-: c; " '.":,-,: ~:,~,',;(,,:--,;:, :;.'.:,<~':.,'__: ;;,:/;':,\:,--:','_,-:-_;
:. . '.,,", "",," ",' "-' ':-' -"-,,,.:.: .-..'..,..,.:-....;;,-',':.-,,:
,.FindihgS&t=l~Comm~ndati9~$:"""".' '
;','- :- . , -, -",,' -,'-", , ': ',--:',:"",-:--:",-,-;,~'" - :,'; ':-".;~.,.:'~~'-::('.':.,"i'>:';:~:-::;:'~:''''----'
')Recommel'lclation#2:i,..,.., , ,."Li,T"'.
A.8lJP~orttheefforts'()fihflSCvvMAt~d~.Y~lop0H~~(
, 99n)pqstin!JCapacitY.iriSorlomaCbl.Jn~;al'l~'.;;;i'..r,,'. .,;
,.' encouragethe.faCilitYdesigritciinclU~~if69~y.,~$te' '
compostiog ',', , '>'1
. - '_ : "'_ ':: ~':,'.: ,', "",:'_'.:_: -\''':'; :-,:' ::-;t:
,B. . Determine the f~asipilityof:theSRL~P playipg.
a role,inthere..useOffoodwaste. '.',,'.', .,.;."
G. Once a full food waste. diversion program is "
available, do focused one-time education outreach
to generators to maximize its use
16
8
". '.' '." ._-, ,'-
; ',,-,::,,--,-,-,':
....-.'" ,.'.',.'.
",-,-..'-'-',,' '---.
",,'" """
'-".' ",-'
"Findings" &,:Fieco:m rnefld~tierrS~;:<'"
.., ", ,- . -"- -.'-~ ,',' ---'-"';< ''''. ":" '-,' "," _.-- '-- ,- '.. "-':,' - ,'-,--- :',-,':
~~~~~.!(?~0?~4"~n:.-'Z.~~~~~~~~~.>'l.~-' :
',""""-.,,,-,._':<,'-'.- '.:' c/o:'
'",,>:,.-,"::,:':::"',:
-' .: .~ \: ". .
:!:":-'-,,-:-"':--,":,--,-'
'.:. ',;--"'.-'.<'~"-.,' ,;.:-.,.:'.---.'
" -'-"--..,.-...-,.,,,;-
~.-.-:,:_,' ,-,<./
:,--,,',"
,:,:'->-"",:;-""'~
., ; : . ,:, '.. ,:~':' ~-',
,. ,,>"",.-
, "': ~ "", --:..'~.,
. .:~. ,:,' -. :.-~<:.',..:,:. :,.;<>:,~:,::": ':
. .-", ".'-.:_: - ',' '.- .-,-," :.
. '. ",-- "'-' '..'",
,',,-.,' '-.....- .,....-
"--' - -,', '-. .-.,'- -'" .
. ," ',-, -d...". .,.,.
',.'.':; .,'.;-',' --- .--,-,,.. .,',
-,- " -''', "'-- "..'.
" "'..:.' ..:,:,,:' ::,,-,. .
,--,"-.::;/
~,,1..__--: .. ..
.,.,',""-',:
. "-.;.,""-';
,,' F,irlCting.s:'.'~.".R;e6Qrl1rn.~.n~9.ati()~ij~;;'~>~;'
<. -:,;.'.''''':-.''':'''':.-'.'.:-;' ,'.','",: . :"-.-,-:'.. "'-,-'>..,':--.'.;:'. ,,': :.':::..~_<.:::~::':/:\,.:';':;.::'<(::::,)::::.:':,>..:.;..~:-.::'.-.:.-i:(:
.",RecOrnlnendation.#3:i.. _ .<. ".,p '.",.,,
'A.StLJdydevelopmenfofa MixedWasteProCes~hig;.>
,Facility 'that targets the Multi;;Family C()mm~rcial" "..' ,,".
Waste Stream" " ' .," ,".", , ' : '".'..', '
; ':,'- ,',:,.: ,-,) :,':-"," ", ;,....{ .: -<":''-'' :'.>,_.....:,::.:::-:=.-.:. :::: '--' "':.'-:,'"<:.::,\,,_::,\,',,,):;~,?..j:-:.:~~/:":.,<:-_."-,:
B. Design Flexibility into the system for Emergir;t9 ",", ",.,
Technologies
9
~"::':':::'::'-"':-'::<,,'::-:,:"<
';-' "'. .:.,:. --'\.',<'.-::','-::-
.'. ,:,,}:>::;!
Findings &.ReeommelJd~tiQ~~~if,.'.
" '-." - ",c, :. .,: - - .' -';- ',' - - ".'--:' , '. _ .-,.,- ,,-~, '_ ""', --. ',-_', , :_ - '_ -- ' ','- '; _; -c ' ". -_, ' . ',',' , . _ ','_ - ;, - ;:, _ ':..'- ':.-' ',-.
~~~.~~~%~~~t~~-;e.."i~~$.~~:~W~~i.~ '
,:::-,-~~'..', ':~,';-;:':':~< '"
;:'---,'.....',:..
"",' ,'" : .." ," _'._-,. .- ,- .:,_ .-_ " :.' .'__;-" - '._:,' '. c '.:." '::' ',..'.' '__." _-:....'. -': ',.-,.' ,"--. -', -':">'''':, ,:_,:,:, _
Finding #4: Ino[(jef t~aC!1iev~the ~igtl '
, "diversiorigoals,itWiU, be necessary to ~,.
\; ,.,'Jhe ur~nlaind~r/ci6rT1p6~ite" ,';"rni~edrJsr:J(;J ',.' ,
. -6the('mat~[j~SllliU;ih~be ~a~!e.~l;~a'i
, ,': Techl'lologiessLJcnas,aherobicdigestiori;' .
:. }h~tmal ~~\i~i~~ Cp[J;~k~d~~~ ;l1i;~"\
,'., ,'/ ,. stream and create renewable energy. ?[
, ',', '. lechnOI()giesareexpe:n~ive.' '. ."..'.',.,',;.,.;.:;,/19;
.,,--,:.'-:'_...,..-':,<:,-'.'.:-':':..;---',"-,' ",.'.
;.:, , .-' ,_:: -:- ,:>";';" ,,;:,:,-,-/-::.,;-:.,;;:>,'::,-,-,>-{::--; >,<
, " '. '-.;:,:; ':'- :'::::' _: ::'--/?",-'::',~,~"~;'~:;:':;:, ':::-' ;<j'\;---;'
, ;,.". \".,..'--,<..::\,:'-::~,}.::<;'I-\::;:-'.'
, , ;._-,....,.,...,';
10
" " ,- '- --,',"",':..' "-.'
, -:.., ,,', ',' ,,--' ,,' -'. -, --, .
,-::, ;,': '_ -<', - ,'-'i ',~ ;";:: '-:, ,::::'-, ,:':':,':'" ','~,':; :,:,', -,_,::/ ,'''':'_:-':..:",__:::'::,-:,:~::: ,:':':,.;:,f::':>'> :",:' .::-
" ,Rep9rtConch.Jsion
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;,_::,-,:
22
11
, .' .'; ."'~' :',"'..,,<,:":
f: ;~>;:. ' .
.. i'::~:~~:~~~h:~o:~~~~b~~t~~G~i~~~~~'3
'.,'...to ,Regulato~ Ag~(lCiEl~]operfnit,th~.~G>~nr".""
L~ndfillJor Long:'term.Di~po~al, ".' .'~ ....""..,,,'.':.:'.
.~~re:~~~:~I;~~~;:1!f~lp. ....~"
..,. ", ..,.~'e~I.~m~ntof; Iiabilities~ 'funqing,and "...,., ','..>'~
'..<,goyerriarice'~ec()h1mehdations '.' ,',.'...".,~ '.',,',,'.'.'
.~ (,1':;:/:";'" .'~
."" .<;)'..;~3>
"',C""" ":","-"',';."",'..:.",'.
~~. ,y,',',:".". :"., :" "" ,',.', :'.' '.' "-' " ,:: :. ';, .-"
:- ,':.',' '~, --,: : .,: -} ,', -: '::", ,;', ;':;" ,,::,. ", ~"..:'..
" , ':' '-- ", .,,-':', - ," . '.'..' :"'.. ,::" , ':..~', -' :', .' " '
"',,,,,,'-';'::"",'.- ,". .,':
... ",:., ,',";','-:,'-":.- '",,'''',:'',''."',' ",'
" . .' , ..', , , , " .'.' ';', '. :- .' ",,;..., ". ,:~.. , . ," '" '.'
""". .-.:' ,'" ',:," : ' ':.', ": :".-,.,-..",":.:,'........,:,...
Next Steps in $;WAGRrQc~~s. . ..
Cost vs. benefit
Sensitivity analysis
12
13
ITEM NO.9
FEE WAIVER AND
CO-SPONSORSHIP POLICY
TO BE DISTRIBUTED
ON 7/12/11
r Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Robnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
7/12/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO.9
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
July 12,2010
Department:
Administration
Submitted By:
Gabriel A. Gonzalez, City Manager
Submittal Date:
July 9, 2011
Agenda Title:
Fee Waivers and Co-Sponsorships
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve the draft "City of Rohnert Park Fee Waiver and Co-Sponsorship Policy"
BACKGROUND
The City routinely receives requests from governmental agencies, local non-profit and community service
organizations, and private enterprises to co-sponsor various activities, orto waive temporary use permit
fees and! or rental fees for the use of City facilities. Staff recognizes the value of partnering with others in
a fiscally responsible manner to provide additional services of benefit to the community, and has
developed a draft policy to facilitate fulfillment of these requests.
Organizations would be eligible for fee waivers or co-sponsorships only when they meet criteria specified
in the policy and reGeive City Manager approval.
PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Currently, requests for fee waivers and co-sponsorships are approved on a case-by-case basis. No
standards exist to ensure a consistent and equitable process. A policy addressing the handling of these
requests will meet that objective.
FISCAL IMP ACT/FINANCING
Fee reductions are already provided for non-profit organizations as part of the facility rental fee schedule.
Co-sponsorships and fee waivers for special events could result in reduced revenue totals at fiscal year-
end, e.g., facility rentals and temporary use permits. Consequently, it is anticipated only a minimal
number of events would receive approval each year. Waived fees in the past year include Project
,
,
Graduation ($3,600), Community Voice Family Fun Day ($750), and Community Voice Cinco de Mayo
($375).
IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES OR PROJECTS
All resources to be provided by the City in co-sponsorship of an event or program would be within
current funding allocations, and expenditures would not result in a reduction of other City services. The
City would retain the right to refuse any request meeting the criteria, based on lack of resources.
Organizations would be required to mitigate unplanned impacts on facilities.
CONCLUSION
The fee waiver and co-sponsorship policy will provide the community with a fair and open process for
requesting and receiving City support for their endeavors. Approval of a limited number of these requests
will not overly burden the City's resources.
Enclosures: Draft City of Rohnert Park Fee Waiver and Co-Sponsorship Policy
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item
( ) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
(X) Regular Item
Per City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item.
(Revised 031309) JH:TG-S:05-b
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
CO-SPONSORSHIP AND FEE WAIVER POLICY
INTRODUCTION:
The City of Rohnert Park routinely receives requests from non-profit organizations,
service clubs, and others to co-sponsor various activities, or to waive temporary use
permit fees and/or rental fees for the use of City facilities. Examples of these activities
include public music performances, art exhibitions, sporting events, sales of food or
merchandise, walk-a-thons, tele-a-thons, raffles, and auctions.
Recognizing the value of partnering with other ag(3nci~s and organizations to provide .
additional services of benefit to the community,.; whjle still upholding its fiscal
responsibilities, the City has established the following policy to direct when fees may be
waived or co-sponsorships approved.
POLICY:
Fees may be waived, or co-sP9psorships approveq, by the City Manager or his/her
designee, based on his/her dete '.;, lion that thep[()gram or event: 1) is of significant
value to the community or to a portion ofit~ residents, and 2) is within the
scope of services normally provide
~ra~~igneewill also consider factors
ht, pr€>~~~(3d event location and time of
nd monetary cost to the public.
Before granting aP8%p~
including but not li@!imaa
day, impact on thes~!~. undin
While indi~ig~~I~:orgaprivate enterprises may qualify for fee
waivers~E~o'i~p(),;m.Y:f>rshl " is policy's criteria, the City does not
guaral')t(3(3;all reque$t~(;'r^(i11 be .'... mmo ..' he City Manager (or his/her designee)
may det~rmine not to p~~.Mide si:J rt, due tack of adequate funds or other resources,
or when the, request repr~~(3nts ~Cqnflict of interest or is not in the best interest of the
City.
. -.
, .,
Activities specifiCi3Hy prohibit~.q::.from City co-sponsorship or waiver of fees include those
that: enhance privat~~usine;'es; are held on behalf of, in support of, or in opposition to
any political candidat ot measure or advocate a political position; advocate or
promote the sale or us ',m tobacco, alcohol, controlled substances, firearms or other
weapons; promote adult~6riented businesses or include pornography; or that solicit
criminal activity. Religious organizations, companies or groups may obtain fee waivers
or co-sponsorships if the proposed program, event or project neither promotes religious
messages nor advocates for or promotes religious beliefs.
The City's co-sponsorship or financial support of events or programs is not intended to
create public forums of general speech and/or public expression, except as provided by
law. To the extent any event, site, project or program is designed for a specific purpose
1
or public message, such event, site, project or program shall remain a non-public forum
subject to the City's exclusive use and control.
All resources to be provided by the City in co-sponsorship of an event or program shall
be within current funding allocations, and expenditures shall not result in a reduction of
other City services. If the Facility Use Fee schedule approved intermittently by City
Council includes reduced fees for use of facilities by certain types of organizations, such
organizations shall not be entitled to a fee waiver under this Policy for such previously
approved use. Fee waivers may be reflected in reduced revenue totals at fiscal year
end.
The City reserves the right to access all activiti~&,~t any time to ensure all rules,
regulations, conditions of use, City and health ~m~}s~fety laws are not violated. Co-
sponsorships and fee waivers can be revoke 9tany time,~ffective immediately, if the
recipient agency or organization fails to co ,/. ith this policy or any other local, State
or Federal regulation.
Those seeking fee waivers or co-sponsorships must q!Jalify under one of the following
three categories:
1. Government
Fees may be waived or
government agency whose
its normal busines ctions.
ap~~~~ed when the applicant is a
consi~tent with the performance of
2.
s approved for a non-profit or community
ing criteria:
of it or community service organization
'ty of Ro 'Ii Park or surrounding communities (may
;:IRS documentation of non-profit status).
B. ' The impositiq!!)\ of fees or absence of co-sponsorship would create a
fin.~ncial hard~~tp on the organization or would have a detrimental effect
on t~~,,~ervic~&;provided to the public.
C. The ever:t~ii~,f:;;program will be open to the public and is in compliance with
the City's non-discrimination policy and all other applicable City policies.
D. The proposed event or program shall not have a significant impact on
existing or future City facilities or other City activities, and any minor
impacts shall be mitigated by the applicant or its volunteers. If such
impacts cannot be mitigated, the public benefit provided by the event or
program must outweigh the impacts created.
2
3. Private Enterprise
Fees may be waived or co-sponsorships granted for an event, program or
project proposed by an individual or private business if all the following criteria
are met:
A. Neither the applicant nor any other individual or private business will
profit financially from the event, program' or project.
B. The event, program or project is within the scope of services provided by
the City.
C. The event or program is open to the PLJRliC and is in compliance with the
City's non-discrimination policy and;;jII'otl"'1~r applicable City policies.
E. The proposed event or program shall noth@y~ a significant impact on
existing or future City facilj~t~~<or otherCitY<9~tivities, and any minor
impacts shall be mitigateg<.~y the applicant orjt~yolunteers, If such
impacts cannot be mitigated, the public benefit provided by the event or
program must outweigh the inip;;jcts creaf$d.
The following applies to all~~.~9.~~.L prograniSi/Cihd projects designated as co-'
sponsorships or for which fees haV~be~nNyaived:
A. Use of facilities for programs<,
on: prior rese Council
City Councilj<.., '.' r urgen
Manager). Preference I be giv
City.
.' . .
.~ subjet!;!p facility availability, based
> !;~.~ g6V~E,ned by Section IX of the
e~9'1~ye<;!~i.~ (as determined by the City
those activities conducted directly by the
":,:,:;::\.,::<,<,_,,'::. 'i;,:.,".
B. Alla~$rleie$or, orga";}Hons~~~.~~~tihg'use of City facilities must complete a
~~()i1ity UseA8~licatio.pd Agree~~pt The City Manager may, at his or her
di.~.~retion, place'."~~8diti6n.< n the use'to minimize impacts to facilities or costs to
the)~i~y, or to resfo~~!tacilitl , pre-event condition.
C. APPlici~I"It~may bei~~,~ired tdi'purchase Special Event Insurance providing for
general liability up to $~,.OOO,OOO (two million dollars) per occurrence, and a hold
harmless agr$~menL)\Fhe per-occurrence amount and insurance fee shall be
determined aridp(;lidfatthe time application is made.
:<::":!.:::"
D. A refundable secl.ffity deposit may be required. Dep osit a mounts are set to
ensure proper clean-up and cover the City's costs for remediation of any damage
or loss. If the full deposit is not received by the specified date, the facility request
shall be cancelled and approval withdrawn.
E. Applican ts utilizing facilities shall comply with all requirements normally
applicable to use of City facilities. Applicants are required to check with staff to
assure all conditions of the facility use permit have been met, based on
standards established by the City. Deposits will be refunded within four (4) to six
(6) weeks of the event or activity, if standards have been met.
3
"
F. Applicants shall secure any necessary additional permits, e.g., from the County
Health Department for food sales, and alcohol use permits.
G. Appropriate recognition of the City of Rohnert Park as co-sponsor of or
contributor to the event or program will be provided on all promotional materials
and at the event or program. Promotional materials, the event/program
schedule, location and activities must be approved in advance by the City
Manager or his/her designee.
H. When conducting fundraising events or progral"t)s, applicants must provide
financial statements detailing funds raised andctiSlfibuted, within thirty (30) days
following the event or program.
I. Applicants are responsible for paym~Hfof thefLlIJeost of materials, labor,
replacement, repairs, or damages ." d to the!e.M~l1t, project or program,
, regardless of the amount. If da occurs and theF,completed remediation
costs the City less than the a f the deposit, the ctifference shall be
refunded.
program or project, the City
ase basis:
Upon agreeing to co-sponsor op
may provide some or all of the foil',
1. City staff assistance with pia .
2. Use of the City' e, logo, 0
3. Use of City re luding ,
4. Assistance tion of
Cable Televi ,I Focusecr~atio
5. Display space fOrpfom ,qJ materi ,
:,::,'::'::::,~i',':,::_",., '{;,:t~::;::,'_.
ofi~~'*~~;~,r~~~~hiP may deliver a written appeal for
r, no late,f:f't~an thirty (30) days prior to the proposed
made by the City Manager shall be final.
','"
Staff shalljp~9Mide annual\ orts:.e City Manager regarding fee waivers and co-
sponsorships~Pl?roved or."'. lemen ed during the past fiscal year. Reports shall
include City costS,a.nd com ts regarding the effectiveness of the co-sponsorship/fee
waiver program inpr.qvidil). ,dditional recreational and community services through
private and non-profit'PSl~;',> ships. The City Manager shall provide the report to City
Council no later than sixt~(('60) days following the close of the fiscal year.
4
Distr. @ Mtg. Of:
cc:
cc:
To: Rohnert Park City Council File:
File:
Re: Agenda Item 9, FEE WAIVER AND CO-SPONSORSHIP POLICY
Tonight you will be reviewing the draft Fee Waiver and Co-Sponsorship Policy. First, thank you
for your time and consideration of this policy. Rohnert Park city and residents have long
, yearned for a central area for fun community events. This has recently been confirmed with the
much successful Friday night Farmer's Market, Party on the Plaza, and Downtown Summer
Cinema. Thank you to the city for realizing this need and organizing some of these events.
Others however, such as the Summer Cinema are in no way city sponsored. Other cities in our
surrounding area have a city staff member that is paid by the city to organize and fundraise for
these events with the city providing the staff hours with members from many departments
sharing the load for things such as zoning, planning, safety, fundraising, etc. In Rohnert Park, I,
a private citizen, resident and local business owner recognized the need and very willingly and
enthusiastically took it upon myself to acquire the property, apply for the permits, organize the
event, and fundraise to pay for it. The Downtown Summer Cinema is a not-for-profit event. All
money raised is spent on the event for movie equipment rental, portable bathrooms, signage,
printing, movie royalties, hay bales, and miscellaneous supplies. Local sponsors make this event
possible to be free to the families of Rohnert Park and our surrounding areas. An additional
$1600 in permit fees as currently requested by the city of Rohnert Park will come directly out of
my personal pocket and potentially kill this event in the future. I want to keep this event free and
there is only so much money I can fundraise from local businesses. So far that number is $6250,
which will cover almost all costs, except the $1600 requested by the city for permit fees. This is
truly a showing of great support from local business to the citizens of Rohnert Park. I hope the
city can help in the same way.
I hope that the "friendly city" will help with events in our city that are family oriented and that
meet the goals and intents described in the city's general plan, downtown development plan, the
economic development plan and the description for uses in "mixed-use" areas.
I know that we are in tough financial times. The permit fees are figured based on staff time from
current city employees who were paid the same amount of money whether they spent time
reviewing my permit or not. There was no direct cost to the city, only the opportunity to help
make the city a better place for our families. As elected officials and representatives of our
citizens, helping members of the community make this a better place is what we want from you.
The city should do everything possible to support such events to help bring the community
together and bring people from the surrounding area to our town to eat dinner, buy goods, and
use our services. I sincerely love Rohnert Park and think it's the best place in the world to raise a
family. I want to help contribute to the fun family atmosphere of Rohnert Park and appreciate
any cooperation from the city to make this happen. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Sincerely, Jeff Schach, RohnertPark's Downtown Summer Cinema
1400 K STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PH:(916) 658-8200
, FX: (916) 658-8240
7/12/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 10
~ ~M~I~1l~
CITIES
WW\V.CACITlES.ORG
Council Action Advised by August 26,2011
RECEIVED
JUN 1 6 2011
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
June 9, 2011
TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks
RE:DESIGNA TION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND AL TERNA TES
League of California Cities Annual Conference - September 21-23, San Francisco
The League's 2011 Annual Conference is scheduled for September 21-23 in San Francisco. An
important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (at the closing General
Assembly), scheduled for 2:30 p.m., Friday, September 23, at the San FranciscoMoscone West
Convention Center. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on
' ,
resolutions that establish League policy.
In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting
delegate~ , Your city may also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote
in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity.
Please complete the attached Voting Delegate fOJ:m and return it to the League's office
, no later than Friday, August 26,2011. This will allow us time to establish voting
delegate/alternates' records prior to the conference.
Please note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting
process at the Annual Business Meeting.
- Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate
and up to two alte111.ates must be designated by the city council. When completing the
attached Voting Delegate form; please attach either a copy of the council resolution that
reflects the council action taken, or have your city clerk or mayor sign the form affirming
that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that
designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and
cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone.
-Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be
registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they
may register for Friday only. To register for the conferen~e, please go to our website:
www.cacities.org. In order to cast a vote, at least one person must be present at the
Business Meeting and in possession of the voting delegate card. Voting delegates and
alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up
-more-
~'~1191'M
, '~
)t)
"
the voting delegate card at the Voting Delegate Desk. This will enable them to receive
the special sticker on their name badges that will admit them into the voting area during
the Business Meeting. '
~ Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting
delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but
onlyb,etween the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find
themselves unable to attend the Business Meeting, they may not transfer the voting card
to another city official.
· Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the Business Meeting, individuals with
the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission to this area will be limited to those
individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate
or alternate. If the voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, they must sign in at
the Voting Delegate Desk and obtain the special sticker on their badges.
The Voting DelegateDesk, located in the conference registration area ofthe, San Francisco
Moscone West Convention Center, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, September
21,8:30 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.; Thursday, September 22,7:30 a.m. - 4:00p.m.; and September 23,
7:30-10:00 a.m. The Voting Delegate Desk will also be open at the Business Meeting on Friday,
but not during a roll call vote, should one be undertaken.
The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please
share these procedures and this memo with your council ahd especially with the individuals that
your council designates as your city's voting delegate and alternates.
Once again, thank you for completing the voting delegate and alternate form and returning it to
the League office by Friday, August 26th. If you have questions, please call Mary McCullough
at (916) 658-8247.
Attachments:
· 2011 Annual Conference Voting Procedures
· Voting Delegate/Alternate Fonn"
~kF~~~~~
CITIES
1400 K Street, Suite 400. Sacramento, California 95814
Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240
www.cacities.org
,Annual Conference Voting Procedures
2011 Annual Conference
1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to
League policy.
2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city
council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are
identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credentials Committee.
3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may
pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration
area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk. Here they
will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at
the Business Meeting.
4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates
(or alternates), and who have picked up their city's voting card by providing a signature to
the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk, may sign petitions to initiate a
resolution.
5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a City official must have in his or her possession the city's
voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting card may be
transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to
another city official who is neither a voting delegate or alternate.
6. Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meeting, individuals with a voting card
will sit in a designated area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special
sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate.
7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the
validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the
Business Meeting.
7/12/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 11.B.1
seTA
490 MEN[)OCINO AVI\NlW, SOl'n:206
SANTA ROSA, CA 95401
WWW.SCTAINI'O.ORG (707) 565-5373
t'A
!iOflOma CQUlltv trcmsJ)t1rtatiOfl.,t,ttMrltv
reqlona~ clfmat<- Pfot~e:tIOl'l alJtMtity
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA
July 11,2011- 2:30 p.m.
Sonoma County Permit & Resource Management Department
Planning Commission Hearing Room - 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA
1. Call to order the meeting of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCT A) and the
Sonoma County Regional Climate Protection Authority (RCPA)
2. Public comment on items not on the regular agenda
3. Consent Calendar
A. SCTA Consent
3.1. Hwy 101 - cooperative agreement with Petaluma for Old Redwood I/C (ACTION)*
3.2. Hwy 101 - cooperative agreement with Cotatirelated to Central A construction (ACTION)*
3.3. Hwy 101 - MSN 8-2 cooperative agreement #4-2213, Amendment #3 (ACTION)*
3.4. Hwy 101 - North Marin Water District cooperative agreement (ACTION)*
3.5. Measure M - appropriation & de-obligation for Santa Rosa Creek Trail phases (ACTION)*
B. SCTA/RCPA Concurrent Items
3.6. Minutes of the June 6, 2011 meeting (ACTION)*
4. Regular Calendar
C. RCPA
4.1. RCPA Planning
4.1.1. CCA - feasibility study status report (ACTION)
4.1.2. Cap & Trade, Dividends and Offsets Study Session - draft agenda (ACTION)*
4.2. RCPA Projects 'and Programs
4.2.1. RCPA activities report (REPORT)*
D. SCTA
4.3. SCT A Planning
4.3.1. Comment letter to A8AG/MTC on Initial Vision Scenario (ACTION)*
4.3.2. Local Roads - 2011 Pothole Report from MTC (REPORT)*
4.4. SCTA Projects and Programming
4.4.1. SMART - status report (ACTION)
· Report on TAM action related to funding for SMART
4.4.2. TFCA - Transportation Fund for Clean Air FY11/12 Program of Projects (ACTION)*
4.4.3. Transit - State Transportation Assistance (STA) update for FY11/12 (REPORT)*
4.4.4. Green My Ride - Real Time Ride Share request for proposal (ACTION)*
4.4.5. Hwy 101 - Marin/Sonoma Narrows 8-4 & 82/84 Combined Funding Plans (ACTION)*
4.4.6. Measure M - 2011 Strategic Plan - Maintenance of Effort policy proposal (ACTION)*
4.4.7. Measure M - 2011 Strategic Plan - Highway 101 programming (ACTION)*
4.4.8. Hwy 101 - Central 8 CTS mitigation (ACTION)*
4.4.9. Update on State Highway projects - Rte. 116 and Hwy. 101 (REPORT)
5. Reports and Announcements
5.1. NCRA report
@@~(I)
.
~@
@
2
5.2. MTC report*
5.3. Executive Committee report
5.4. Advisory Committee agendas*
5.5.SCTA/RCPA staff report
5.6. Announcements
6. Adjourn
*Materials attached.
The next SCTAIRCPA meetings will be held September 12, 2011
Special RCPA Study Session on Cap and Trade will be held August 8, 2011
Copies .of the full Agenda Packet are available at www.sctainfo.org
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability that requires the agenda materials to be in an alternate format or that requires an
interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact SCTAlRCPA at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to
ensure arrangements for accommodation.
SB 343 DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the SCTAlRCPA
after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the SCTA/RCPA office at 490 Mendocino Ave., Suite 206, during
normal business hours.
Pagers, cellular telephones and all other communication devices should be turned off during the committee meeting to avoid electrical
interference with the sound recording system.
TO REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS: Please consider carpooling or taking transit to this meeting. For more information check www.511.om.
htto:/lwv'Iw.srcitv.oralcitvbus or www.sctransit.com
3
7/12/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 11.8.2
RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED AS~__.... .-..
TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP MEETING
July 12, 2011, 8:30 AM - 10:00 AM
Windsor Town Council Chambers
9291 Redwood Road, Windsor, CA 95492
RUSSIAN RIVER
WATERSHED ASSOCIATION
AGENDA
1. Greetings and Introductions
2. RRWA Project UpdatesJ Work Plan Kick-off
. Outreach Strategies
o Environmental Column - sign up and topics for 2011-2012
o RRWA web site enhancements
o Creek Cleanup sponsorships
. North Coast IRWMP update
. Creek Week 2011 - kickoff discussion
. Creek Signs Bulk Order :.- creek name lists
. MS4 Permit Support
o Pollutant Specific Outreach update
o StormwaterActivities Table for 2010-2011
o LID Manual review and comments
. Phase II Stormwater Update
o CASQA key issues
o RRWA Working Group recommendation to Board
o Forum to follow this meeting
'. Stormwater Training
o QSP/QSD - August 9-11, Ukiah
o CESSWI- August 15 & 16 (QSP prerequisite), Santa Rosa
. Storrnwater Citizens Advisory Group
o Safe Medicine Disposal Program update - meeting to follow this meeting
3. Forum and Advocacy
. Update from July 1, 2011 lunch meeting with RWQCB staff
. Topics for Sept 15, 2011 lunch meeting with RWQCB staff
. Discussion of potential future advocacy items
4. Future Meetings and Agenda Items
. Next Working Group - August 9, ,2011 (followed by October 11)
. July 28, 2011 Board of Directors - Low Impact Development Technical Design
Manual, City of Santa Rosa
. BODfTWG Upper Watershed/Ukiah meeting and tour - Sept 22, 2011
5. Items of Interest
6. Public Comment
7. Adjourn
STORMWATER PHASE II FORUM FOLLOWS THIS MEETING - 10:15 -11:30
SAFE MEDS MEETING FOLLOWS THIS MEETING - 10:15 -11:30
The Russian River Watershed Association complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals
with disabilities upon request.
Please contact Virginia Porter at (707) 833-2553 with any questions.
7/12/11 City Council Agenda
Item No. 12
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
July 12,2011 Meeting
1. Barbara Homan I Resident
2. Sylvia de Souze I Resident
3. Christine White I Resident
4. Sammy Twasha& 7 relatives I Resident
5. Robert and Rita Stedman
6.
7.
Opposition to outsourcing police and fire
Opposition to outsourcing police and fire
Opposition to outsourcing police and fire
Phone call opposing outsourcing police
Opposition to outsourcing police and fire
6/27/11
6/27/11
6/29/11
7/01/11
7/07111
Communications Distributed at meeting (7/12/11)
I~
I]
1. I
: ~!
~ j
j
! J
i
,+ ":j..~_...._-!-_....,..J.."
\ ,i '
; i
t
1 r
!
i T-n~- I;,
, ' ! ! i : !
~ ~ i, i V- j ~~! 1 ~ i ~ ~"~ -t .... - ~
n~ 00 i' ' ,~,' i ;ji I' ' ~
-. ' . . ",. ,~. ' "
"',. ' ,I I "'" . "-
, II- i . 0.; ~ -y ~..! i . " ~. J . d ~
i~Q(~ ~ : ~ ~ J~ i .1.~ t~ . :. ~?j ~ ~ J tl
. ! J ~. ~ ~ r .' j; 4 d .
~ :; ~ ~. '" ~; . ~1" ~ ~~ 1" ~ 'iJ '1~
!iiI""" u.. ~.' ~.~. ~ Q... ... 0- "t' . ~ .~
..... ~ G .C ClC:.,. '< e>:-: .3 · ? j
..... is . .~, · "1.. :3
u .' .:...'
June 22, 2011
RECEIVED
JUN 2 7 2011
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
City of Rohnert Park
City Ha II
130 Avram Ave.
Rohnert Park, CA
Attn: Members of City Council
Ladies and Gentlemen:
lam very distressed and concerned to learn that you are
planning to outsource our Local Police and Fire Services.
The residents of Rohnert Park voted to pass Measure E in
order to maintain our local Police and Fire Services. Now you
want to renege on your promise? If you outsource the Police
and Fire Services the tax money earned will go to Sonoma
County and not to Rohnert Park as was intended. That is NOT
right! !
For the safety of the residents of Rohnert Park, I urge you to
please do not out source our Local Police and Fire Services.
I know times are hard right now for EVERYONE, but please
consider our safety.
Thank you.
A very concerned resident,
~_~h~,
Sylvia de Souza
5.1(, L~tt-Ic/ Cf. ~
Christine K. White
634 Santa Alicia Drive
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Rohnert Park Council Members
City Hall
130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
RECEIVED
JUN 2 9 2011
~rN OF ROHNERT PARK
June 24, 2011
Re: Elimination of Rohnert Park Police and Fire Fighter Jobs
Dear Mayor Belforte, Vice Mayor Mackenzie, and Council Members Ahanotu, Callinan
and Stafford,
I am appalled to learn that you rejected the proposal that the bargaining unit put forth. I
have great empathy for the police officers and fire fighters and their families to have the
devastating threat of loss of jobs and homes.
As a member of this community, I have personally benefitted from emergency medical
services and police services multiple times. As a voter, in the next election I promise to
vote against anyone that approves a proposal that replaces our local force with the
sheriff's department.
I know about the risks that fire fighters face because my husband was a professional
firefighter with the City of San Rafael for over 30 years. I know the sacrifices that
spouses and families make because of the work schedule. They miss holidays,
anniversaries, watching their kids play sports, miss school events and parties. They help
people who are at their lowest, and the emotional toll can be great. How very
disappointing that you would be so disloyal.
Please reconsider your decision making and treat the police officers and fire fighters
with the respect they deserve.
Sincerely,
~
t~~
Christine K. White
Cc: Rohnert Park Police Officers and Fire Fighters
Stedman Schloss
5249 Daniel Dr.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
ROHNERT PARK
JUl - 7 2011
CITY CLERK
To Members of the City Counsel,
We are distressed over the possibility of losing our local police and fire
department. We feel that this is not in the best interest of the citizens of
Rohnert Park. Like many other citizens, we voted for Measure E to keep our
local fire and police department. Now that we are paying the increase in
taxes, the City Counsel is considering not giving the citizens what we
bargained for. We urge the members of the City Counsel to make
responsible choices as our representatives. The fire and police department
are a valuable and necessary part of our city's pulse. During emergencies we
need an emergency response team that can be where they need to be quickly
and efficiently. Minutes count in every emergency andhaving a local police
and fire department is essential.
Sincerely,
~"~V?Ji~~~-
Business Owners and Residents of Rohnert Park,
Robert and Rita Stedman
'. ,
-.{ .:' l- ,:.-
...:.0.
-.: I,.!.)'
J Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELlNES for Regular City Council Meetings {This section for City Clerk Use Only}
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no 7/12/11 City Council Agenda
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization", ITEM NO. B.A
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets [Distributed 7/12/11]
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesdaymorning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Robnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date: July 12,2011
Department: Administration
Submitted By: Gabriel A. Gonzalez, City Manager
Submittal Date: July 12,2011
Agenda Title: Matters From/For Council: Rohnert Park 50th Celebration
REQUESTED ACTION: Council direction to staff to agendize the request for financial contribution
for the regularly scheduled Rohnert Park City Council meeting of July 26,
2011
BACKGROUND
In 2012, Rohnert Park will be celebrating its 50th anniversary as an incorporated city. Presently, a group
of city residents and groups has come together to plan Rohnert Park 50th Celebration. The City has
received a request fot a financial contribution in the amount of $24,000 from the Rohnert Park 50th
Celebration (attached is their letter and revenue spreadsheet). In their letter the group is requesting to use
the funds for a number to pay for various costs associated with the event.
The 50th Celebration is a significant event to the community, in particularly since several of the original
city founders still reside in Rohnert Park as well as long term families from the original Rohnert Park
days. The event will be open to the community and the group is planning a marketing strategy to attract
people from outside the City to visit Rohnert Park during the Celebration.
Staffwill need to work with the City Attorney's office to develop criteria to make a determination that the
City's financial contribution is not a gift of public funds and identify a list of eligible expenditures that
again are not deemed a gift of publics and/or inappropriate. Also, additional information from the
Rohnert Park 50th Celebration may be warranted to fully evaluate the return of investment of the $24,000
by the City.
Enclosures: Letter
Revenue Spreadsheet
0
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item ( ) Regular Item
( ) Approval () Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended O Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
Per City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item.
(Revised 031309) JH:TG- S:05 -b
Rohnert Park 50th Celebration
Scope of the event:
The Rohnert Park 50th Celebration is a one day event, September 15, 2012. The purpose of this event is
to bring the citizens, businesses, groups and clubs of Rohnert Park together to celebrate the 50th
anniversary of the city.
The event will begin with a parade, time yet undetermined, but most likely a late morning start. It will
most likely begin at the middle school, pass down Snyder and end at East Cotati Avenue.
The next stage of the event, which may overlap some of the end of the parade time, will be a fair/market
on the city campus at the corner of Snyder Lane and Rohnert Park Expressway. The anticipated list of
activities include food vendors, a history of Rohnert Park exhibit, game booths for children, art and craft
vendors, car show, contests, two stages with entertainment rotating through, and non-profit group
booths.
The final stage of the event may be fireworks. These may be staged somewhere behind the high school
with the idea that they can be viewed from the event on the city campus as well as from the high school
parking lot.
The anticipated overall attendance at this event is 3000-5000 people.
Getting the word out:
The committee wants to begin soliciting sponsorships now from local business and community entities;
Many businesses are creating their 2012 budget now, necessitating immediate ramping up of the
sponsorship portion of our process to best access their 2012 dollars.
The committee has contacted the high school sports department with the anticipation that Rancho
Cotate's homecoming can be scheduled for the same weekend as this event. The committee intends to
involve the schools as much as possible not only in the parade but in other activities such as an art
contest to design banners to hang around the city in 2012 advertising the event. The committee will be
contacting all groups and clubs asking them to designate 2012 a year to remember the 50th anniversary
of Rohnert Park as well as giving the 2012 Friday Night Market a 50th Anniversary theme.
Income:
There will be income generated by both pre-event opportunities and at the event.
Pre-event income:
. sponsorships
· sales of commemorative buttons, hats and t-shirts
· possible fireworks booth both in 2011 and 2012
Event income:
. parade fees
. booth and vendor fees
· parking fees
· sales of beer, wine, soda and water
· sales of commemorative buttons,hats and t-shirts
\,
All income generated will be used to defer costs. The committee intends to give all income to the city to
pay back any upfront costs the city may shoulder. Subsequent income will be used to pay any costs not
initially funded by the city and all final proceeds, if any, above expenses will be given to the city to use
inside the non-profit entity for any future city events.
Anticipated income streams are estimates at this point and you will see they are incomplete for the entire
scope of the event. We will have the ability to nail them down more closely later on this year. The
parade, booth and vendor fees will rely on an accurate participation count. That count cannot be
determined until final mapping of the event creates capacity boundaries, and actual selling of spaces
begins. Beer, wine, soda and water sales will contributeto income, and we hope to get a more accurate
idea of possibilities with the 2012 Friday Night Market numbers. 2011 Friday Night Market numberswill
be used in the meantime.
Expenses:
There will be expenses that will require both 'in kind' city services and actual funds. Examples of'in kind'
needs are Public Safety throughout the day, Public Works assets such as safety barriers and garbage
cans, and the man power to deliver them to the site, and the use of power and water at the site. We are
working closely with Guy Miller to coordinate those costs.
Actual funds will be needed to, as examples, create sponsorship and public relations packets, buy
marketing supplies such as banners, supply the Historical Society with boards and supplies for their
display, hire bands for entertainment and supply them with a stage and sound, stock a beer, wine, soda
and water concession, and fireworks.
EntityIssues:
The committee had two issues that would be solved by being allowed to run under a non-profit
corporation; one being the need for a one day beer & wine license and the other for insurance. We
understand the city is currently working to resurrect a non-profit corporation and that it is 60-90 days out
from completion. Ifwe may be allowed to access that non-profit corporation we could use it for the
gathering and tracking of monies and as a contact point for mail inquiries, as well as the entity that
would afford us the opportunity to apply for the one day beer & wine license and obtain insurance.
Until the city completes the non-profit corporation filing we request that the city council allow the city to
accept sponsorship donations and other moriies. As expenses are incurred we request the city then
disburse payments.
Funding Request:
The committee needs to request funding from the city from both their 2011-12 budget and their 2012-13
budget. 2011-12 budget monies are needed for start up costs. 2012-13 monies and in-kind services will
be needed to supplement the income stream generated from fees and sponsorships to pay costs incurred
before the event itself can create income.
The committee is requesting $24,139 from the 2011-12 budget to cover costs as seen on the attached
Expenses spreadsheet. These funds will enable the creation of publicity and sponsorship packets, a logo,
a website and buy banners.
Rohnert Park 50th Celebration
Income
Source Anticipated Revenue
Fireworks Booth
Parade
Early Bird fees Number of Participants
non - commerical tbd $ 40
commercial tbd $ 250
youth bands tbd free
Regular fees
non - commerical
commercial
youth bands
Late Entry fees
non - commerical
commercial
youth bands
Booths
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
Number of booths
Art & Craft
Games
Food Venders
Beer & Wine Concession
wine & beer
sodas & water
Sponsorships
Parking
10
$ 60
$ 350
$ 20
$ 100
$ 600
$ 40
Fee
$ 60
$ 100
$ 300
Income
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
$ 3,000
unit of sales price
$ 5 $ -
$ 1 $ -
levels and dollar values to be determined tbd
unit of sales price