2010/03/09 City Council Agenda Packet
Judy Hauff
City Clerk
City Hall
.City of Rohnert Park + 130 Avram Avenue + Rohnert Park, California 94928
PHONE: (707) 588-2227 + FAX: (707) 588-2274 + WEB: www.rpcitv.ore
ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
Community Development Commission
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Joint Regular Meeting - Open Session: 6:00 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBER
130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California
The Rohnert Park City Council welcomes your attendance, interest and
participation at its regular city meetings scheduled on the
2nd and 4th Tuesdays of each month at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber.
City Council/CDC/RPF A Agendas and Minutes may be viewed at the City's website:
www.rpcitv.or!!
Council/CDC/RPFA may discuss and/or take action on any or all of the items listed on this agenda.
If you challenge decisions of the City Council, the Community Development Commission, or the
Rohnert Park Financing Authority of the City of Rohnert Park in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearing(s) described in this Agenda, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Rohnert Park at, or prior to the public hearing(s).
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter
or other person to assist you while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the
City Clerk's Office at (707) 588-2227 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure
arrangements for accommodation by the City. Please make sure the City Clerk's Office is
notified as soon as possible if you have a visual impairment requiring meeting materials to
be produced in another format (Braille, audio-tape, etc.)
PUBLIC COMMENTS: For public comment on items listed or not listed on the agenda, or
on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time (limited to three minutes per
appearance and a 30 minute total time limit, or allocation of time based on number of speaker
cards submitted) - PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING -
*SEE NOTE ON LAST PAGE OF THIS AGENDA
Copies of all staff reports and documents subject to disclosure that relate to each item of business referred to on the
agenda are available for public inspection by 11 :00 a.m. the Friday before each regularly scheduled City Council
meeting at City Hall, located at 130 Avram Avenue. Any writings or documents subject to disclosure that are
provided to all, or a majority of all, of the members of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after the
agenda has been distributed will also be made available for inspection at City Hall during regular business hours.
I,
6:00 p.m.
1. CITY COUNCIL, CDC & RPFA JOINT REGULAR MEETING - Call to Order/Roll Call
(Belforte _ Breeze_Callinan _ Mackenzie_Stafford-.-J
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Led by Andrew Lopez, Student,
Waldo Rohnert Elementary School
3. SSU STUDENT REPORT - Sonoma State University Associated Students, Inc. Student
Report by Jesse Schwartz, SSU ASI Legislative Representative
4. PRESENTATIONS
1. Homeless Prevention Program Mid- Year Update by Sonoma County Adult and Youth
Development (SCA YD)
5. CITY MANAGER / CITY ATTORNEY / DEPARTMENT HEAD BRIEFINGS
This time is set aside for City Staff to present a verbal report to the full Council on the
activities of their respective departments. No action may be taken except to place a particular
item on a future agenda for Council consideration.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons wishing to address the Council on any consent Calendar item or on City business not
listed on the Agenda may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes.
Those wishing to address the Council on any report item listed on the Agenda should submit
a "Speaker Card" to the City Clerk before announcement of that agenda item. Speakers are
asked to speak directly into the podium microphone so comments may be heard and recorded.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the consent calendar will be considered together by one action of the City
Council, the Community Development Commission, and/or the Rohnert Park Financing
Authority, whichever is applicable, unless any Council Member or anyone else interested
in a consent calendar item has a question about the item.
1. Approval of Minutes for:
a. City Council Special Meeting - February 23,2010
b. City-CDC-RPFA Joint Regular Meeting - February 23,2010
c. City Council Special Meeting February 26, 2010
2. Acceptance of Reports for:
a. City Bills/Demands for Payment
b. CDC Bills/Demands for Payment
c. City Cash/Investments Report for Month Ending January 31, 2009
3. City Council Resolutions for Adoption:
a. 2010-20 Amending the Outline of Certain Conditions of Employment, Fringe
Benefits, and Salary Adjustments for the Management Unit to Remove the
Director of Public Safety and Authorizing the City Manager to Fill the
Position of Director of Public Safety Through an Employment Contract
b. 2010-21 Approving an Amended Retention Schedule for Sonoma County Public
Safety Consortium Records
8. REVENUE BALLOT MEASURE - Consideration of Ballot Argument III favor of a
Temporary Funding Measure for the June 8, 2010 Election
1. Revenue Enhancement Ad Hoc Committee Report, 2/12/10 mtg. (AB/JM)
2. Public Comments
3. City Resolution for Adoption:
a. 2010-22 Approving and Authorizing the City Council to Submit an Argument in Favor
of the Rohnert Park Essential City Services Temporary Funding Measure, to
be Submitted to the Voters at the Consolidated Primary Election to be Held on
June 8, 2010
i. Council motion
ii. Council discussion
iii. Council vote
9. CITY BUDGET - NEXT STEPS to consider following February 23rd work session on
review of FY 2009-10 Service Levels and Budget
1. Staff Report
2. Public Comments
3. Council discussion/direction/action
10. REVIEW OF CDC PROJECTS & PROGRAMS
1. Staff Report
2. Public Comments
3. CDC discussion/direction/action
11. CAMPAIGN FINANCE REGULATIONS - Consideration of amending Chapter 2.65,
"Campaign Finance Regulation", S2.65.11 0, "Penalties," of the Rohnert Park Municipal
Code
1. Staff Report
2. Public Comments
3. Ordinance for Introduction: Waive Further Reading and Introduce Ordinance by
Reading Title:
a. No. 820 Amending Chapter 2.65, "Campaign Finance Regulation", S2.65.11O,
"Penalties," of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code
i. Council motion
ii. Council discussion
iii. Council roll call vote
12. STANDING COMMITTEE / AD HOC COMMITTEE / LIAISON REPORTS
This time is set aside to allow members of the Council serving on Council subcommittees or
on regional boards, commissions or committees to present a verbal report to the full Council
on the activities of the respective boards, commissions or committees upon which they serve.
No action may be taken except to place a pmiicular item on a future agenda for Council
consideration.
d
1. Standing Committee Reports, if any
a. Economic Development, 2/25/10 mtg. (PS/GB)
2. Ad Hoc Committee Reports
a. General Plan Implementation, 2/23/1 0 mtg. (PS/GB)
b. Other, if any
3. Liaison Reports
a. Sonoma County Waste Management Agency (SCWMA), 2/17/10 mtg. (DS)
b. Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCT A) & Regional Climate Protection
Authority (RCP A), 3/8/10 mtg. (JM)
c. Other, if any
4. Other Reports
a. Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund (REMIF) Annual Meeting, 1/28-1/29/10
(GB)
b. Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association, 2/11/10 mtg. (PS)
c. Other, if any
13. COMMUNICATIONS
Copies of communications have been provided to Council for review prior to this meeting.
Council Members desiring to read or discuss any communication may do so at this time.
No action may be taken except to place a particular item on a future agenda for Council
consideration.
14. MATTERS FROM/FOR COUNCIL
1. Consideration of earlier meeting start time (PS)
a. Council discussion/direction
2. Water Issues Subcommittee Report, 3/5110 mtg. (JM)
a. Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Budget - City
Council consideration of direction for Rohnert Park's Water Advisory Committee
Member regarding the SCW A FY 2010-11 Budget
i. Council discussion/direction/action
3. Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association - City Council consideration of supporting
letters of interest for vacancies:
a. Sonoma County Child Care Planning Council Committee
i. Council discussion/direction/action
b. Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)
i. Council discussion/direction/action
c. Airport Land Use Commission
i. Council discussion/direction/action
4. Calendar of Events
5. City Council Agenda Forecast
6. Other informational items, if any
15. PUBLIC COMMENTS
16. ADJOURNMENT of City Council-CDC-RPFA Joint Regular Meeting
NOTE: Time shown for any particular matter on the agenda is an estimate only. Matters may
be considered earlier or later than the time indicated depending on the pace at which the meeting
proceeds. If you wish to speak on an item under discussion by the Council which appears on this
agenda, after receiving recognition from the Mayor, please walk to the rostrum and state your
name and address for the record.
- PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING -
Any item raised by a member of the public which is not agendized and may require Council
action shall be automatically referred to staff for investigation and disposition which may
include placing on a future agenda. If the item is deemed to be an emergency or the need to take
action arose after posting of the agenda within the meaning of Government Code Section
54954.2(b), Council is entitled to discuss the matter to determine if it is an emergency item
under said Government Code and may take action thereon.
CERTIFICA TION OF POSTING OF AGENDA
I, Terri Griffin, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Rohnert Park, declare that the foregoing agenda for the March 9,
20 I 0, Joint Regular Meeting of the Rohnert Park City Council/CDC/RPF A was posted and available for review on
March 4, 20] 0, at Rohnel1 Park City Hall, 130 A vram A venue, Rohnert Park, California 94928. The agenda is also
available on the City web site at www.rpcitv.org,
Signed this 4th day of March, 20] 0, at Rohnert Park, California.
0309] 0 AGENDA-Jt.Regualr Mtg,-RPCity Council-CDC-RPFA doc
~
City of Rohnert Park+ 130 Avram Avenue+Rohnert Park, California 94928
Phone: (707) 588-2225+ FAX: (707) 792-1876+ WEB: www.rpcitv.ore
ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
NOTICE AND AGENDA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a SPECIAL MEETING of the
CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF ROHNERT PARK,
will be held on
Friday, March 12,2010, at 1:30 p.m.
at the Doubletree Hotel, Sonoma Room
One Doubletree Drive, Rohnert Park, California
Said special meeting shall be for the purpose of the following:
1 :30 p.m.
1. CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - Call to Order/Roll Call
(Belforte _ Breeze_Callinan _ Mackenzie_Stafford-.-J
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO CONSIDER:
1. PERSONNEL MATTERS (Government Code S54957)
a. Public Employment
Title: City Manager
4. RECONVENE SPECIAL MEETING OPEN SESSION
5. MAYOR'S REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION (Government Code ~ 54957.1)
6. ADJOURNMENT of City Council Special Meeting
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while
attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City Offices at (707) 588-2225 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to
ensure arrangements for accommodation by the City. Please make sure the City Manager's office is notified as soon as possible
if you have a visual impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another format (Braille, audio-tape, etc.)
PUBLIC COMMENTS: For public comment on items listed or not listed on the agenda, or on agenda items if unable to speak at the
scheduled time (limited to three minutes per appearance and a 30 minute total time limit, or allocation of time based on number of speaker
cards submitted) - PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING - JH-03l2l0 Special Agenda-RPCity Council
Miwok District Centennial Campfire
Program
Pre- Campfire Displays
Scouting Memorabilia: Bob & Donna Lake, Steve Marshall
BSA Founders: Bill Nay
College Planning Assn: John Murray
Flag Ceremony, Scout Oath and Law: Troop 7
Firestarters: Order of the Arrow, Orca Lodge
Ali Benzerara, Troop 55
Carl Peterson, Troop 4
Welcome and Introductions: Masters of Ceremony
Tyler Harwood, Troop 7
Phillip Johnson, Troop 7
Monica Peterson, Crew 4 and Ship 1
Cheerleaders: Zack Rockafellow & Sam Keechler, Troop 16
BSA Centennial Video
History of BSA and Miwok District
Grandpa: Lee McCann (voice by Jim Taylor)
Cub Scout: Caleb Wood, Pack 3 (voice by Jill Richardson)
Lord Baden - Powell: Philip Sales, Troop 16
Daniel Carter Beard: Bill Nay
Others: Miwok District Scouts, Scouters and Chartered
Organization Representatives
Essay Contest���_
Presentation of Awards: Ed Schramm and Grant Goodeve
Tiger Cub Winner: Alex Hoffman, Pack 16
Cub Scout Winner: Ian McKissick, Pack 84
Webelos Scout Winner: Wyatt Lage, Pack 16
Boy Scout Winner (age 11 -14): Jackson Keechler, Troop 16
Older Scout Winner (age 15 -20): Ronald Kohut, Troop 16
Adult Winner: Jill Richardson
,,?oo~.( ~ ilIA, eJt:1 ~'
~ 0' ..J \' oJ"'"" -. (l.Ji ~ f<"
q~ ,~ ~;~Qr~ 0
f~ . .@Mt
CC: } 9,- Of: 't t: :J,
cc: . '("p",^^ ' of$?
F"I l
Ie:
File:
-:>
This guide is part of the 2010
Big Read, Sonoma County
Provided by KRCB TV 22,
Radio 91 FM & www.krcb.org
P� \. u p ,r-�' '�ar �Z �; -F.y arc. �.
SCAYD Homeless Prevention Program
Households and Families Funded for each FY
L
FY 2004 -05
FY 2005 -06
FY 2006 -07
FY 2007 -08
FY 2008 -09
FY 2009 -10
21
Households
People
Households
People
Households
People
Households
People
Households
People
Households
People
L
a,
July
17
40
1 11
21
9
24
9
19
11
28
14
40
�a
Q
August
8
19
13
29
7
19
26
49
14
42
15
34
37
1 90
1 47
1 113
1 46
1 117
1 44
1 05
Total
102?
1 244? 1
161
1 397 1
r
September
6
19
9
23
10
19
11
21
14
38
14
29
Subtotal
1 31 1
78
33 1
73
1 26 1
62
1 46
89
1 39
108 1
43
103
L
October
11
27
9
23
9
21
24
60
16
37
17
32
v
November
8
21
21
54
11
26
14
30
13
37
14
40
N
December
8
18
13
33
17
43
9
23
17
43
13
33
Subtotal
27
66
43
110 1
37
1 90
1 47
1 113
1 46
1 117
1 44
1 05
L
Januar
10
33
11
24
8
22
11
26
15
53
19
67
Q
February
13
35
17
40
9
20
15
37
10
30
13
29
c i
March
1 10
1 32
1 11
1 30
1 17
1 37
1 13
1 24
14
41
Subtotal
1 33
1 100
1 39
1 94
1 34 1
79
1 39
1 87
1 39
1 124 1
32
96
L
i
April
11
26
11
31
13
38
20
52
13
33
�a
v
May
?
?
14
24
16
39
9
25
18
53
June
?
?
21
65
18
47
13
33
14
41
Subtotal
1 11?
1 26?
1 46
1 120
1 47
124
1 42
1 110
1 45
1 127
Total
102?
1 244? 1
161
1 397 1
144
355
1 174
1 399 1
169 1
476
Projected Projected
180 480
Is
Rohnert Park Homeless Prevention Program
Logged Phone Calls
July -
32 Calls
66 Calls
109 Calls
286 Calls
300 Calls
341 Calls
September
1 st Quarter
July /16 Aug /32 Sept /18
July /49 Aug /56 Sept /49
July /82 Aug /101 Sept /103
July /89 Aug /119 Sept /92
July /112 Aug /117 Sept/112
October -
37 Calls
79 Calls
189 Calls
282 Calls
336 Calls
325 Calls
December
2nd Quarter
Oct /34 Nov /24 Dec /21
Oct /68 Nov /52 Dec /69
Oct/117 Nov /85 Dec /80
Oct /109 Nov /117 Dec /110
Oct /90 Nov /124 Dec /111
January -
65 Calls
96 Calls
190 Calls
325 Calls
342 Calls
a s (through
February)
March
3rd Quarter
Jan /34 Feb /32 Mar /30
Jan /69 Feb /49 Mar /72
Jan /129 Feb /100 Mar /96
Jan /139 Feb /87 Mar /116
Jan /169 Feb /89 Mar/
50 Calls
91 Calls
230 Calls
297 Calls
288 Calls
April - June
4th Quarter
Apr /29 Mav /30 June /32
Apr /72 Mav /61 June /97
Apr /119 Mav /82 June /96
Apr /133 May /91 June /64
Projected 1,392
TOTAL 184 Calls 332 Calls 718 Calls 1,190 Calls 1,266 Calls Calls
I
Rohnert Park Homeless Prevention Program
Workshop Attendees
July- 32 Attendees 60 Attendees 62 Attendees 82 Attendees 94 Attendees 121 Attendees
September
1 st Quarter July /20 Auq /31 Sept /11 July /34 Aug /22 Sept /26 July /37 Aug /27 Sept/30 July /41 Aug /48 Sept /32
October- 37 Attendees 80 Attendees 60 Attendees 95 Attendees 116 Attendees 111 Attendees
December
2nd Quarter Oct/24 Nov /21 Dec /23 Oct/26 Nov /39 Dec /30 Oct /34 Nov /40 Dec /42 Oct /31 Nov /39 Dec /41
January - 65 Attendees 75 Attendees 80 Attendees 97 Attendees 116 Attendees 80 Attendees
March
3rd Quarter Jan /29 Feb /20 Mar /31 Jan /37 Feb /24 Mar /36 Jan /42 Feb /32 Mar /42 Jan /53 Feb /27 Mar/
April - June
4th Quarter
50 Attendees 1 66 Attendees
84 Attendees 93 Attendees 109 Attendees
)r/23 May /33 June /28 Apr /38 May /31 June /24 Apr /46 May /33 June /30
Projected 468
TOTAL 184 Attendees 11 281 Attendees 286 Attendees 367 Attendees , 435 Attendees I Attendees
},
-----'J\18J88U!S
'dI8L1 JnoJ\ liB JO! U!B6B nOJ\ >tUBLI..L
'8IqB:W0!W08 188! 8W 8pBW nOJ\ lnq L1l!M :WBlS Ol d18L1
JO! >tSB Ol 8W JO! L16nOU8 PJBLI SBM II '8SB8 lB 8W lnd lnq
W81qOJd J\W 8^IOS nOJ\ P!P J\IUO lON '8PBW 8M UO!l8BSUBJl
8L1l U! S8W!lIIB lB nOJ\ L1l!M 8SB8 lB SBM IlBLll MOU>t
I 08!IQnd 86BJ8^B 8L1l Ol 8P!^OJd J\8L1llBLll 88!^J8S pUB Qof
8L1llnoqB 8JB8 lI!lS 81d08d 8WOS 88S Ol 6U!L1S8J!8J S! II o8W
JO! p8J\BldS!p nOJ\ SB UJ88U08 pUB l88dS8J L18nS L1l!M P8lB8Jl
U88q I 8^BLI qof 8lBlS JO J\lUn08 B U! >tJOM lBLll 81d08d
L1l!M IB8P Ol PBLI 8^BLlllBLll SJB8J\ J\UBW 8L1l J8^O 'OlU!
!18SJ\W u8u06 8^BLllOU PlnoLlS IlBLll UO!lBnl!S B !O lnO 8W
6U!dI8L1 U8L1M p8J\BldS!p nOJ\ lBLll WS!IBUO!SS8!OJd pUB d18L1
8L1l1lB JO! nOJ\ >tUBLll Ol S8lnU!W M8! B 8>tBl Ol P8lUBM I
'J\J08 JB80
601 L ~/60
SCAYD Homeless Prevention Program
Households and Families Funded for each FY
L
FY 2004 -05
FY 2005 -06
FY 2006 -07
FY 2007 -08
FY 2008 -09
FY 2009 -10
21
Households
People
Households
People
Households
People
Households
People
Households
People
Households
People
L
July
17
40
1 11
21
9
24
9
19
11
28
14
40
Ca
Q
August
8
19
13
29
7
19
26
49
14
42
15
34
37
90
47
113
46
117
44
105
Subtotal
33
100
39
94
r
September
6
19
9
23
10
19
11
21
14
38
14
29
Subtotal
31
78
33
73
26
62
46
89
39
108
43
103
L
October
11
27
9
23
9
21
24
60
16
37
17
32
cc
0
November
8
21
21
54
11
26
14
30
13
37
14
40
cm
December
8
18
13
33
17
43
9
23
17
43
13
33
M
Subtotal
27
66
43
110
37
90
47
113
46
117
44
105
L
Januar
10
33
11
24
8
22
11
26
15
53
19
67
ca
o
May
?
?
14
24
16
39
9
25
18
53
a
February
13
35
17
40
9
20
15
37
10
30
13
29
M
March
10
32
11
30
17
37
13
24
14
41
Subtotal
33
100
39
94
34
79
39
87
39
124
32
96
i
April
11
26
11
31
13
38
20
52
13
33
ca
o
May
?
?
14
24
16
39
9
25
18
53
June
?
?
21
65
18
47
13
33
14
41
Subtotal
11?
26?
46
120
47
124
42
110
45
127
Total
102? 1
244?
161
397
144
355
174
399
169
476
Projected Projected
180 480
3
Rohnert Park Homeless Prevention Program
Logged Phone Calls
July -
32 Calls
66 Calls
109 Calls
286 Calls
300 Calls
341 Calls
September
1 st Quarter
July /16 Aug /32 Sept /18
July /49 Aug /56 Sept /49
July /82 Aug /101 Sept /103
July /89 Aug /119 Sept /92
July /112 Aug /117 Sept /112
October -
37 Calls
79 Calls
189 Calls
282 Calls
336 Calls
325 Calls
December
2nd Quarter
Oct /34 Nov /24 Dec /21
Oct /68 Nov /52 Dec /69
Oct /117 Nov /85 Dec /80
Oct /109 Nov /117 Dec /110
Oct /90 Nov /124 Dec /111
January -
65 Calls
96 Calls
190 Calls
325 Calls
342 Calls
258 Calls (through
February)
March
3rd Quarter
Jan /34 Feb /32 Mar /30
Jan /69 Feb /49 Mar /72
Jan /129 Feb /100 Mar /96
Jan /139 Feb /87 Mar /116
Jan /169 Feb /89 Mar/
50 Calls
91 Calls
230 Calls
297 Calls
288 Calls
April - June
4th Quarter
Apr /29 May /30 June /32
Apr /72 May /61 June /97
Apr /119 MaV /82 June /96
Apr /133 MaV /91 June /64
Projected 1,392
TOTAL 184 Calls 332 Calls 718 Calls j 1,190 Calls 1,266 Calls Calls
--7
ID
Rohnert Park Homeless Prevention Program
Workshop Attendees
July -
32 Attendees
60 Attendees
62 Attendees
82 Attendees
94 Attendees
121 Attendees
September
1 st Quarter
July /20 Aug /31 Sept /11
July /34 Aug /22 Sept /26
July /37 Aug /27 Sept/30
July /41 Aug /48 Sept /32
October-
37 Attendees
80 Attendees
60 Attendees
95 Attendees
116 Attendees
111 Attendees
December
2nd Quarter
Oct /24 Nov /21 Dec /23
Oct/26 Nov /39 Dec /30
Oct/34 Nov /40 Dec /42
Oct /31 Nov /39 Dec /41
January -
March
3rd Quarter
April - June
4th Quarter
65 Attendees 75 Attendees 80 Attendees 97 Attendees 116 Attendees 80 Attendees
Jan /29 Feb /20 Mar /31 Jan /37 Feb /24 Mar /36 Jan /42 Feb /32 Mar /42 Jan /53 Feb /27 Mar/
50 Attendees 66 Attendees 84 Attendees 93 Attendees 109 Attendees
Apr /23 May /33 June /28 Apr /38 May /31 June /24 Apr /46 May /33 June /30
TOTAL 184 Attendees 281 Attendees 286 Attendees 367 Attendees 435 Attendees 1 PAttendeess$
h
-----'AI8J8JU!S
'dI8L1 JnOA liB JO~ U!B6B nOA >jUBLI..L
'8IqB:W0~WOJ 188~ 8W 8pBW nOA lnq Lll!M lJBlS Ol d18L1
JO~ >jSB Ol 8W JO~ Ll6noU8 PJBLI SBM II '8SB8 lB 8W lnd lnq
W81qOJd AW 8AIOS nOA PIP AIUO lON '8PBW 8M UO!lJBSUBJl
8L1l U! S8W!lIlB lB nOA Lll!M 8SB8 lB SBM IlBLll MOU>j
I 'J!lqnd 86BJ8AB 8L1l Ol 8P!AOJd A8L1llBLll 8J!AJ8S pUB qof
8L1llnoqB 8JBJ lI!lS 81d08d 8WOS 88S Ol 6U!LlS8J~8J S! II '8W
JO~ p8ABldS!p nOA SB UJ8JUOJ pUB p8dS8J LlJnS Lll!M P8lB8Jl
U88q I 8ABLI qof 8lBlS JO AlUnOJ B U! >jJOM lBLll 81d08d
Lll!M IB8P Ol PBLI 8ABLlIlBLll SJB8A AUBW 8L1l J8AO 'OlU!
~18SAW U8:ij06 8ABLllOU PlnoLlS IlBLll UO!lBnl!S B ~O lno 8W
6U!dI8L1 U8L1M P8ABldS!p nOA lBLll WS!lBUO!SS8~OJd pUB d18L1
8L1l1lB JO~ nOA >jUBLll Ol S8lnU!W M8~ B 8>jBl O:}. P8lUBM I
'AJ08 JB80
60/ L ~/60
CJ)
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
Date: ("..) IGt ( I () Agenda Item #: \D ~tt~l
Name: C_her y I lE\.Lt.\.e_r.
Address: S;/O~ 1:)e..'t"\ec G{ Q 9
Phone: S ~ b' \ <{S 1 C;
TOPIC: C be ~Jec..\->
Brief Summary of Comments:
( V ~Or d''';i '" C D!Y\~ da -40 r>
foe an Glt~wpose C\.e\d
See Reverse -')0
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD 0
Date:
"',<. "~' f;::t
_.)
Agenda Item #:
\t
t:;~'.) f~), t~~,~Tf_,/<
'-)'
::'.-...-
:-' ~'~'\
" -, A
Name:
,'<
\ '; '(' '" A
~''>':"J t,,...:,......<t"/r
Address:
Phone:
~_ 1
",I i,",.",! r~"A \,'~, ',,~ -~- ~'" ;!
" _co ,_ ,} ',f-:...; i '~\_.L.;'\
;,._,;-.~) '._.J \, ,f:
f:) f~"t
l o~ r '", "1. S:"'{-'C"",}
I",,) .4'~ '...,
TOPIC:, C'\j, ". i\ "", \
~(')\. .?cb;
'\,,~... ';-I_-.'~ ',.,..._,.
Brief Summary of Comments:
See Reverse -')0
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
Date: 3 q ! 0 Agenda Item #: l 0
iAf2~ L oN EI:'AN q=: L.(...,
Address: n 00 vkLq;y' +{';HJ~\.o/' j')"R, (( ,P,
Phone: ') () ""7 "" &&f 0;)0 (
TOPIC: c...'Oc..- Pi<...o:s GC){'S r'
Brief Summary of Comments:
C670-tt $,fY 15
~ ,<lei-'"> ,,~ ,.'"
<) () VI.' '-" d'\..\
(~
~ M OC, P f\,DS "~~;:c'Jr 4<_,0> . ,~~, \,,! /7 $').'
(f'./ FvN\)lN6.
See
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
Date: --:s "l A
- genda Item #:
Name: Erl' ( f?v! r (I .r
Address: .,:5 I EYe C-r
Phone: 707-S6'l-7S3)
/0
TOPIC:
( Dc
Brief Summary of Comments:
Stilet.. ~V'-4\,^,"i ,'Vt: s~ --To
( (') 1M VV\- E' of\-f
See
MINUTES OF THE ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
Community Development Commission
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
MEETING LOCATION: CITY HALL- COUNCIL CHAMBER
130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California
The Rohnert Park City Council, Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert
Park, and the Rohnert Park Financing Authority met this date for the Joint Regular Meeting
scheduled to commence at 6:00 p.m. with Mayor Stafford presiding.
1. CITY COUNCIL, CDC & RPFA JOINT REGULAR MEETING - Call to Order/Roll Call
Mayor Stafford called this meeting to order at 6:22 p.m.
Present: Pam Stafford, Mayor
Gina Belforte, Vice Mayor
Arnie Breeze, Council Member
Joseph T. Callinan, Council Member
Jake Mackenzie, Council Member
Absent: None
Staff and/or consultant partIcIpants: Daniel Schwarz, Interim City Manager; Michelle
Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney; Sandy Lipitz, Director of Administrative Services; Cathy
anne, Accounting Manager; Linda Babonis, Housing & Redevelopment Manager; Brian
Goodman, Housing & Redevelopment Assistant; Darrin Jenkins, Director of Development
Services; John McArthur, Director of Public Works & Community Services; Brian
Masterson, Director of Public Safety; and Judy Hauff, City Clerk.
Community Media Center staff present for the recording and televised production of this
meeting: Josh Jacobsen, Video Technician and Josh Cimino, Video Techincian.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Riley Moore, Student, Thomas Page Elementary School,
led the pledge of allegiance. Mayor Stafford presented Riley with a card and a pen.
3. SSU STUDENT REPORT - Jesse Schwartz, SSU ASI Legislative Representative, Sonoma
State University Associated Students, Inc. reported on current activities at SSU.
4. PRESENTATIONS - None
\
5. CITY MANAGER / CITY ATTORNEY / DEPARTMENT HEAD BRIEFINGS
1. Special Enforcement Unit (SEU) Report and Acknowledgment of Federated Indians
of Graton Rancheria (FIGR) Funding - Director of Public Safety Masterson referred to
the hard copy of this report distributed at the dais which was previously provided
electronically to Council and shared highlights of accomplishments, cases and projects by
the Special Enforcement Unit. He commended the work this unit does and the funding
contribution for this unit from the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria. Interim City
Manager Schwarz also commended the importance of this unit and indicated that the City
could not afford what the Tribe contributes for the Special Enforcement Unit.
Mayor Stafford acknowledged Greg Sarris, President of the Federated Indians of Graton
Rancheria, with many representative of the Tribe present in the audience, and invited him
to the podium to speak. Mr. Sarris indicated that the funding for the Special Enforcement
Unit is the will of the Tribe and the many representatives of the Tribe were here tonight to
come forward and let the City Council know this is what they wanted all along, to help
work with the Council to create a safe city. He commented that the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Tribe provides opportunities that will
benefit everyone, not only the Tribe, but the community.
Council comments commended the SEU Report and expressed appreciation to FIGR
President Greg Sarris and the Tribe for the contributions benefiting the entire community.
Vice Mayor Belforte recommended formal appreciation from the City Council to the
Tribe in the future with the presentation of a resolution or proclamation. Council
agreed.
2.a Department of Public Safety - Investigation Changes - Sergeant Jeff Nicks reviewed
the report distributed at the meeting for this item entitled, "2009 High Technology Crime
in California: Annual Report to the Governor & Legislature" and responded to Council
questions. Council commended this report and the effective efforts of the Department of
Public Safety on making the community a safer place.
2.b Department of Public Safety - Grant from California Department of Justice
Director of Public Safety Brian Masterson reported on the recent grant received in the
amount of $80,000 through the California Department of Justice. His comments included
noting this is a win/win situation with receiving these funds and expanding our reputation
with Public Safety Officers' involvement in the task force. Interim City Manager
Schwarz commended Chief Masterson's hard work on this effort to secure this
opportunity for Rohnert Park.
3. Northeast Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) Public Comment
Hearing at the Planning Commission meeting of February 25,2010 at 7:00 p.m.
Building and Planning Manager Marilyn Ponton explained this item which included
noting that the Planning Commission will not take action at this time but will receive
comments to March 15th on this proposed plan.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Stafford invited public comments at 6:57 p.m. She advised
that budget items were already discussed during the work session scheduled prior to this
regular meeting and the budget work session will be reconvened this evening. She noted that
the decision has been made to keep the Performing Arts Center open as a rental only facility.
1. Bill Conner, Rohnert Park, expressed support of keeping at least two pools open.
2. Lyndi Brown, Penngrove, not present, submitted a speaker card indicating support of
keeping pools open.
3. Wade H. Cooper, Rohnert Park, expressed support of keeping pools open.
4. Amy Heflin, Rohnert Park, expressed support of keeping pools open.
5. Yijie Shinn, Rohnert Park, expressed support of keeping pools open.
6. Cheryl Kaul, Rohnert Park, expressed support of keeping pools open.
7. John Metras, Cotati, as a music teacher, expressed support of maintaining operations at
the Performing Arts Center instead of making it a rental facility.
8. Matthew Gilster, Rohnert Park, as lifeguard at Honeybee Pool, expressed support of
keeping at least one pool open on both sides of town.
9. Raghda Zacharia, Rohnert Park, expressed support of the Piranha Swim Team and
keeping pools open.
10. Mike Sweeney, Sebastopol, expressed support of keeping pools open.
11. Larry Jorgensen, Petaluma, expressed support of keeping pools open.
12. Darlene Follansbee, Rohnert Park, as the mother of two daughters on the Piranha Swim
Team, expressed support of keeping at least one pool open year round and a pool open on
each side of town.
13. Diana Steil, Santa Rosa, as an ex-Piranha Swim Team mom, expressed support of
keeping pools open.
RECESS: Mayor Stafford recessed this meeting for a dinner break at 7:32 p.m.
RECONVENE:
Mayor Stafford reconvened this meeting at 8:00 p.m. with all Council Members present.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Stafford advised all items on the consent calendar were considered together by one
action of the City Council, the Community Development Commission, and/or the
Rohnert Park Financing Authority, whichever is applicable, unless any Council Member
or anyone else interested in a consent calendar item had a question about the item.
Council Member Callinan pulled item 1.a on the special meeting minutes.
1. Approval of Minutes for:
b. City-CDC-RPF A Joint Regular Meeting - February 9, 2010
2. Acceptance of Reports for:
a. City Bills/Demands for Payment
b. CDC Bills/Demands for Payment
c. CDC Cash/Investments Report for Month Ending January 31, 2009
d. RPF A Cash/Investments Report for Month Ending January 31,2009
a.
3. City Council Resolutions for Adoption:
a. 2010-13 Rejecting the Claim of James E. Bruns (re: Alleged City leaves blowing on
his property)
b. 2010-14 Approving a Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Rohnert
Park and Sonoma Mountain Village, LLC
c. 2010-15 Amending the ICMA-RC Deferred Compensation Plan (457 Plan)
d. 2010-16 Approving a Cooperation, Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City
of Rohnert Park and the Community Development Commission of the City
of Rohnert Park (CD C) for Assessor's Parcel No. 045-081-007 and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement
e. 2010-17 Approving a Cooperation, Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City
of Rohnert Park and the Community Development Commission of the City
of Rohnert Park (CDC) for Assessor's Parcel Number 045-082-053 and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement
4. CDC Resolutions for Adoption:
a. 2010-03 Approving a Cooperation, Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City
of Rohnert Park and the Community Development Commission of the City
of Rohnert Park (CDC) for Assessor's Parcel No. 045-081-007 and
Authorizing the Executive Director to Execute the Agreement
b. 2010-04 Approving a Cooperation, Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City
of Rohnert Park and the Community Development Commission of the City
of Rohnert Park (CDC) for Assessor's Parcel Number 045-082-053 and
Authorizing the Executive Director to Execute the Agreement
MOTION by Council Member Mackenzie to adopt the Consent Calendar with the exception of
Item l.a on the special meeting minutes, seconded by Vice Mayor Belforte, CARRIED
UNANIMOUSL Y, reading was waived and said motion was APPROVED.
Items for consideration:
1. Approval of Minutes for:
a. City Council Special Meeting - February 9, 2010
Council Member Callinan referred to Item #5 of these minutes on the Mayor's Report
on Closed Session indicating "no reportable action" and shared a portion of
information from the League of California Cities on the Brown Act that an oral or
written report must be provided on actions taken during closed session. Discussion
included City Attorney Kenyon advising that nothing that occurred in the closed
session of February 9th was reportable according to the Brown Act. Further
discussion concluded in Council agreement that the Mayor could read out the titles of
the closed session items as listed on the agenda to provide the information to the
listening audience.
MOTION by Council Member Callinan to approve the February 9, 2010 City Council
Special Meeting Minutes as submitted, seconded by Vice Mayor Belforte, CARRIED
UNANIMOUSL Y, reading was waived and said motion was APPROVED.
8. REGIONAL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE - Consideration of
adopting a Regional Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance or adhering to the state ordinance
currently in effect.
1. Staff Report - Planning and Building Manager Marilyn Ponton reviewed the report
provided for this item via power point presentation and responded to Council questions.
She introduced the local leader of the Regional Stakeholders Group, Daniel Muelrath.
2. Review by Regional Stakeholders Group - Representative Daniel Muelrath responded to
Council questions on this item.
3. Public Comments - None
4. Council discussion/direction
Discussion ensued on this item which included: MOTION by Council Member Callinan
to go with the state ordinance for this item, seconded by Council Member Breeze, and
following discussion of the motion, FAILED 2 - 3 with Vice Mayor Belforte, Council
Member Mackenzie and Mayor Stafford dissenting, said motion was NOT APPROVED.
MOTION by Vice Mayor Belforte to refer this matter to the Water Issues Subcommittee
for review and recommendation, seconded by Council Member Mackenzie, and following
discussion of the motion, CARRIED 3 - 2 with Council Members Breeze and Callinan
dissenting, said motion was APPROVED.
RECESS: Mayor Stafford recessed this joint regular meeting at 8:47 p.m. to reconvene the joint
special meeting scheduled earlier today for the Budget Work Session.
RECONVENE: Mayor Stafford reconvened this joint regular meeting at 10:29 p.m. with all
Council Members present.
9. RESOLUTION DECLARING A FISCAL EMERGENCY - Consideration of declaring a
fiscal emergency and adopting a resolution finding and declaring that a fiscal emergency exists.
1. Staff RepOli - Interim City Manager Schwarz reviewed the staff report for this item which
included reading the findings as indicated in the report for this item.
2. Public Comments - Mayor Stafford invited public comments at 10:33 p.m. No one
responded.
3. City Resolution for Adoption: [Article XIIIC, Section 2(b) of the California Constitution
requires a unanimous vote for approval of this item]
a. 2010-18 Finding and Declaring that an Emergency Exists that Requires Asking the
Voters to Approve an Essential Services Temporary Funding Measure
1. Council motion - MOTION by Council Member Mackenzie to adopt
Resolution No. 2010-18 which included reading the above resolution title,
seconded by Council Member Breeze.
ii. Council discussion ensued.
iii. Council roll call vote - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, reading was waived
and via roll call vote said motion was APPROVED.
.,.,
::>
10. REVENUE BALLOT MEASURE - Consideration of Calling for an Election in June 2010
asking the voters of Rohnert Park to Approve a Temporary Funding Measure
1. Staff Report - Interim City Manager Schwarz explained the staff report provided for this
item and responded to Council questions.
2. Public Comments - Mayor Stafford invited public comments at 10:45 p.m. No one
responded.
3. City Resolution for Adoption:
a. 2010-19 Calling an Election to Ask the Voters of the City of Rohnert Park to
Approve a Five Year General Transactions and Use Tax of One-Half
Cent; Requesting that the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Sonoma Consolidate the Election with the Established Election to be
Held on June 8, 2010; and Directing the County Elections Department
to Conduct the Election on the City's Behalf
1. Council motion - MOTION by Council Member Mackenzie to adopt
Reso]ution No. 20]0-]9 which included reading the above resolution title,
seconded by Council Member Breeze.
ii. . Council discussion - None.
iii. Council vote - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, reading was waived and said
motion was APPROVED.
MOTION by Council Member Callinan to continue the remaining agenda items to the next agenda,
seconded by Council Member Breeze, CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, and said motion was APPROVED.
Due to the lateness of the hour, in accordance with the preceding approved motion, the following
items as listed on the agenda of the open session were not handled at this meeting and were
continued to the next regular meeting:
11. CAMPAIGN FINANCE REGULATIONS
12. STANDING COMMITTEE / AD HOC COMMITTEE / LIAISON REPORTS
13. COMMUNICATIONS
14. MATTERS FROM/FOR COUNCIL
15. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None.
16. ADJOURN TO CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION IN CONFERENCE ROOM 2A
Mayor Stafford adjourned this meeting at 10:47 p.m. to closed session to consider:
1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government Code 954957.6)
Agency designated representative: Daniel Schwarz, Interim City Manager
Rohnert Park Employees' Association (RPEA)
Rohnert Park Public Safety Officers' Association (RPPSOA)
Service Employees' International Union (S.E.I. U.) Local 1021
Rohnert Park Public Safety Managers' Association (RPPSMA)
2. PERSONNEL MATTERS (Government Code 954957)
a. Public Employment
Title: City Manager
17. RECONVENE JOINT REGULAR MEETING OPEN SESSION
Mayor Stafford reconvened this meeting to open session at 11 :05 p.m.
18. MAYOR'S REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION (Government Code ~ 54957.1)
Mayor Stafford advised Council met in closed session regarding matters listed on the agenda
for this meeting. She read the content of the agenda titles listed for this closed session and
advised there was no reportable action from closed session.
19. ADJOURNMENT of City Council-CDC-RPFA Joint Regular Meeting
Mayor Stafford adjourned this meeting at 11 :06 p.m.
Q:~ot~
Judy uff, City CI
City of Rohnert Park
Pam Stafford, Mayor
City of Rohnert Park
l\
MINUTES OF THE ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
JOINT SPECIAL MEETING
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
MEETING LOCATION: CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBER
130 Avram Avenue, Rohnerf Park, California
The Rohnert Park City Council and the Community Development Commission of the City of
Rohnert Park met this date for the joint special meeting scheduled to commence at 4:00 p.m.
with Mayor Stafford presiding.
1. CITY COUNCIL & CDC JOINT SPECIAL MEETING - Call to Order/Roll Call
Mayor Stafford called this meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
Present: Pam Stafford, Mayor
Gina Belforte, Vice Mayor
Arnie Breeze, Council Member
Joseph T. Callinan, Council Member'
Jake Mackenzie, Council Member
Absent: None
Staff and/or consultant partICIpants: Daniel Schwarz, Interim City Manager; Michelle
Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney; Sandy Lipitz, Director of Administrative Services; Cathy
Orme, Accounting Manager; Mary McDougall, PerfOlllling Arts Center Technical Advisor;
Darrin Jenkins, Director of Development Services; Brian Masterson, Director of Public
Safety; John McArthur, Director of Public Works & Community Services; Guy Miller,
Recreation Services Manager; and Judy Hauff, City Clerk.
Community Media Center staff present for the recording and televised production of this
meeting: Josh Jacobsen, Video Technician and Josh Cimino, Video Techincian.
Mayor Stafford explained the procedure for this evening's special and regular meetings to
proceed from this work session directly into the regular session and then taking a break at an
appropriate time.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mayor Stafford invited public comments at 4:02 p.m. No one responded.
Minutes of the Rohnert Park City Council-CDC JOINT SPECIAL MEETING
(2 of 5)
May 1 , 2009
3. WORK SESSION for REVIEW of CITY & CDC BUDGETS:
1. REVIEW OF FY 2009-10 SERVICE LEVELS AND BUDGET - Interim City
Manager Schwarz provided opening comments explaining this is basically part two for
this item with reference to part one reviewed at the previous February 9th Council
meeting. He indicated this meeting heavily emphasizes the Performing Arts Center and
Recreation Department as requested at the last meeting. He shared the challenges of
losing redevelopment funds to the state and heading into virgin territory noting it was
challenging to put a cost estimate on a few of these items this evening. He advised staff
will provide a brief presentation as compared to the last meeting and that the information
on the dais at this meeting from Public Safety was the only thing not included in the
agenda packets distributed to Council.
Director of Administrative Services Lipitz provided the summarized power point
presentation for the 2009-10 Budget Reductions Completed and in Progress which
included participation and/or responses to Council questions throughout the review of this
item by: Sandy Lipitz, Director of Administrative Services with Cathy Orme, Accounting
Manager; Mary McDougall, Technical Advisor for Performing Arts Center; John
McArthur, Director of Public Works & Community Services; Guy Miller, Recreation
Services Manager; Brian Masterson, Director of Public Safety; Dan Schwarz, Interim
City Manager; and Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney.
a. Council discussion/direction/action
Council discussion throughout this budget review included directive action as follows:
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER OPTIONS - MOTION by Council Member Breeze
that the Council direct staff to reduce the subsidy of the Performing Arts Center by about
$100,000 and direct staff to look into viable options for regional groups and at the same
time put a cap on the legal expenses and direct staff to look into legal requirements of the
endowment funds, seconded by Council Member Mackenzie.
Discussion of the motion included a MOTION by Council Member Mackenzie to accept
a friendly amendment to add to the motion the addition of $50,000 of monies identified as
coming from the gift and interest from the endowment fund, to which Interim City
Manager Schwarz advised interest from the endowment fund is already in the picture and
requested the amender to the motion to indicate a grand total. Council Member
Mackenzie indicated it would be a total of $96,000. Lacking a second to the motion, this
amendment to the motion was not accepted.
Further discussion of the initial motion on the floor included: speculation on possible
uses of the endowment funds; City Attorney Kenyon recommended capping attorney time
at eight hours as the amount for legal fees would depend on which attorney works on
review of the legal requirements; Council Member Breeze recommended a cap of $500
for review of the legal requirements; and Mayor Stafford recommended having Interim
City Manager and Director of Administrative Services work on it first with a cap of
$1,000 for review of the legal requirements.
The MOTION on the floor CARRIED 3 - 2 with Council Members Mackenzie and
Callinan dissenting, said motion was APPROVED.
Minutes of the Rohnert Park City Council-CDC JOINT SPECIAL MEETING
(3 of 5)
Mav 1,2009
FINANCE DEPARTMENT ITEMS FOR IMPLEMENTATION/CONSIDERATION
Director of Administrative Services Lipitz continued the power point presentation on this portion
of the review and responded to Council questions. Discussion ensued.
CITY ADMINISTRATION & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ITEMS
FOR IMPLEMENT A TION/CONSIDERA TION
Interim City Manager Schwarz reviewed the power point presentation on these two portions of the
review and responded to Council questions. Discussion ensued.
PROPOSED REDUCTION IN WORKFORCE - With reference to the first two slides of the
power point presentation at this meeting and the handout distributed at the dais for this item,
Interim City Manager Schwarz and Director of Administrative Services Lipitz reviewed this item
further and responded to Council questions. Discussion ensued.
MOTION by Council Member Mackenzie to accept the reductions in workforce as presented,
seconded by Council Member Breeze, and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, said motion was
APPROVED.
CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR LIST- Discussion ensued on this list provided to Council.
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES-Budget for Fiscal Year 2009-10 - Discussion ensued on this
report provided to Council which included explanation of the item by Interim City Manager
Schwarz.
MOTION by Council Member Callinan to reduce the Non-Department budgeted expense by
10%, seconded by Council Member Breeze, and following further discussion which included
explanation by Interim City Manager Schwarz indicating that the vast amount of this item relates
to insurance with a big amount for workers comp so staff would need time to go through it, with
acknowledgment by the maker of the motion that he wanted to make the motion for the 10%
reduction and see what staff comes back with, the motion on the floor CARRIED
UNANIMOUSL Y and said motion was APPROVED.
UNFORESEEN MAINTENANCE - MOTION by Council Member Callinan to eliminate the
$100,000 indicated in the budget for Unforeseen Maintenance, seconded by Council Member
Breeze, and following discussion which included explanation of this item by Interim City
Manager Schwarz indicating this is an element related to risk, the motion FAILED 2 to 3 with
Vice Mayor BelfOlie, Council Member Mackenzie and Mayor Stafford dissenting, said motion
was NOT APPROVED.
Further discussion included noting people were present in the audience waItmg for regular
meeting items; the need to review unfinished items of this special meeting before handling
specified items on the regular meeting; and City Attorney Kenyon responding to Council
question that it can recess and reconvene a meeting at any time.
RECESS: Mayor Stafford recessed this joint special meeting at 6:22 p.m.
~
Minutes of the Rohnert Park City Council-CDC JOINT SPECIAL MEETING
(4 of 5)
Mav 1. 2009
RECONVENE:
Mayor Stafford reconvened the joint special meeting at 8:47 p.m. with all Council Members present.
REVIEW OF FY 2009-10 SERVICE LEVELS AND BUDGET (Continued)
LEGAL SERVICES - Council discussion included: (1) MOTION by Council Member
Callinan to cut City Attorney Fees from $425,000 to $250,000, seconded by Council Member
Breeze; and (2) MOTION by Council Member Callinan that City Attorney Bills should be
approved by Council before being paid, seconded by Council Member Breeze.
(1) MOTION by Council Member Callinan to cut City Attorney Fees from $425,000 to
$250,000, seconded by Council Member Breeze. Discussion of the motion included City
Attorney Kenyon response to Council questions on the breakdown of the Legal Services signified
on page 20 of the Amended Budget 2009-10 in the amount of$425,000 includes the General City
Attorney Services in addition to litigation paid out of the General fund and that litigation not paid
out of the Enterprise Fund for the last year amounted to $338,000 out of General City Attorney
Services and $116,000 for Personnel Services. Maker of the motion Callinan AMENDED THE
MOTION to reduce the $338,000 to $250,000 for General City Attorney Services, accepted by
seconder Breeze, and FAILED 2 - 3 with Vice Mayor Belforte, Council Member Mackenzie
and Mayor Breeze dissenting, said motion as amended was NOT APPROVED.
(2) MOTION by Council Member Callinan for City Attorney Bills to be approved by Council
before being paid, seconded by Council Member Breeze. Discussion of the motion included
City Attorney Kenyon responses to Council questions on the current billing process and
explanation of legal obligations of the City, along with her suggestion that a Council
subcommittee review the attorney bills and sign off on them, which is the current procedure of
the City Manager. Maker of the motion Callinan AMENDED THE MOTION to bring City
Attorney Bills to a Council Subcommittee for approval before being paid, accepted by seconder
Breeze, and FAILED 2 - 3 with Vice Mayor Belforte, Council Member Mackenzie and Mayor
Breeze dissenting, said motion as amended was NOT APPROVED.
PUBLIC SAFETY BUDGET - MOTION by Council Member Callinan to cut the Public
Safety Department budget $300,000 without any layoffs, seconded by Council Member Breeze,
and following discussion, FAILED 1 - 4 with Vice Mayor 13elforte, Council Members Breeze
and Mackenzie and Mayor Stafford dissenting, said motion was NOT APPROVED.
CITY POOLS - Discussion ensued on the information provided in the power point presentation
on M, Band H Pools and included MOTION by Council Member Mackenzie to keep B Pool and
H Pool open and maintain closed M Pool, seconded by Mayor Stafford, andP ASSED 4 - 1 with
Council Member Callinan dissenting, said motion was APPROVED.
Other Considerations for Expense Reduction/Efficiency Improvements - Discussion
proceeded on items listed in this section of the power point presentation and included the
following Council actions.
Minutes of the Rohnert Park City Council-CDC JOINT SPECIAL MEETING
(5 of 5)
Mav 1,2009
BURTON AVENUE RECREATION CENTER - MOTION by Council Member Mackenzie
to close Burton Avenue Recreation Center, seconded by Mayor Stafford. Discussion included
Director of Public Works & Community Services McArthur responding to Council questions
which included the belief that Burton A venue Recreation Center is holding its own. Council
Member Mackenzie WITHDREW the motion.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS on above referenced list - MOTION by Council Member
Mackenzie to turn off tennis and ball court lighting, implement central stores, eliminate or
restrict dumping privileges at Corp. Yard, decommission spas, eliminate morning lap swim, and
assume street lighting maintenance for one year, seconded by Council Member Breeze,
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, said motion was APPROVED.
LEGAL SERVICES - With reference to categories for General Government Expenditures in
the 2009-10 City Budget, page 20, a MOTION by Council Member Mackenzie that General
Attorney Services be $285,000 and that there be a line item for General Legal Services for the
City Attorney services the City is purchasing, seconded by Council Member Callinan,
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, said motion was APPROVED.
REVENUE ENHANCEMENTS - Discussion ensued on this section listed under Other
Considerations in the power point presentation. MOTION by Vice Mayor Belforte to
implement the Revenue Enhancements which included implement voluntary Senior Center
membership, lease City Hall Annex to OADS, demo Community Center fountain/site renovation,
and adjust facility rental, picnic, and swim fees, CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, said motion was
APPROVED.
PARKS RESTROOMS - Discussion ensued on the proposal to close the restrooms in city parks
as reviewed by Director of Public Works & Community Services McArthur. MOTION by
Mayor Stafford to close the restrooms in city parks as reviewed and find alternative solutions,
CARRIED 4 -1 with Council Member Callinan dissenting, said motion was APPROVED.
PUBLIC SAFETY BUDGET - Concluding comments of this session included MOTION by
Council Member Callinan without any layoffs in Public Safety to make a reduction of $150,000
in the Public Safety Department budget, seconded by Council Member Breeze, FAILED 2 - 3
with Vice Mayor Belforte, Council Member Mackenzie and Mayor Stafford dissenting, said
motion was NOT APPROVED.
In closing, Council comments acknowledged the power point slide showing the accumulated
total in the amount of $985,000 for budget cuts indicated throughout this work session.
4. ADJOURNMENT of City Council & CDC Joint Special Meeting
Mayor Stafford adjourned this meeting at 10:22 p.m.
r;!:;yr;:..1i~1
City of Rohnert Park
Pam Stafford, Mayor
City of Rohnert Park
3
MINUTES OF THE ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
Friday, February 26, 2010
MEETING LOCATION: The Doubletree Hotel, Sonoma Room
One Doubletree Drive, Rohnert Park, California
The Rohnert Park City Council met this date for the Special meeting scheduled to commence at
11 :00 a.m. with Mayor Stafford presiding.
1. CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - Call to Order/Roll Call
Mayor Stafford called this meeting to order at 11: 1 0 a.m.
Present: Pam Stafford, Mayor
Gina Belforte, Vice Mayor
Arnie Breeze, Council Member
Joseph T. Callinan, council Member
Jake Mackenzie, Council Member
Absent: None
Staff and/or consultant participants:
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney, and Bobbi C. Peckham, Peckham &
McKenney.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mayor Stafford invited public comments at 11: 1 0 a.m. No one responded.
3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION:
Mayor Stafford recessed this meeting at 11: 1 0 a.m. to closed session to discuss:
1. PERSONNEL MATTERS (Government Code ~54957)
a. Public Employment
Title: City Manager
4. RECONVENE SPECIAL MEETING OPEN SESSION
Mayor Stafford reconvened the special meeting open session at 6:35 p.m. with all Council
Members present.
Minutes of the Rohnert Park City Council SPECIAL MEETING
(2 of 2)
February 26, 2010
5. MAYOR'S REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION (Government Code ~ 54957.1)
Mayor Stafford advised Council met in closed session regarding matters as listed on the
, Special Meeting Agenda and there was no reportable action from closed session.
6. ADJOURNMENT of City Council Special Meeting
Mayor Stafford adjourned this meeting at 6:35 p.m.
Pam Stafford, Mayor
City of Rohnert Park
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
BILLS FOR APPROVAL
March 16,2010
Check #191108-191361
Dated February 18 - March 3, 2010
TOTAL
..,..
$1,280,578.09
$1,280,578.09
Accounts Payable
Checks for Approval
User: speterson
Printed: 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
191101
02/18/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
Bldg/Facilty
HOME DEPOT
52.17
Check Total:
52.17
19110`
02/18/2010
General Fund
Police
/Spec Dept Equ
R.H.F. Inc
144.17
19110$
02/18/2010
General Fund
Police
/Spec Dept Equ
R.H.F. Inc
75.00
191109
02/18/2010
General Fund
Police
/Spec Dept Equ
R.H.F. Inc
75.00
191100
02/18/2010
General Fund
Police
/Spec Dept Equ
R.H.F. Inc
100.00
191109
02/18/2010
General Fund
Police
/Spec Dept Equ
R.H.F. Inc
75.00
191100
02/18/2010
General Fund
Police
/Spec Dept Equ
R.H.F. Inc
75.00
19110
02/18/2010
General Fund
Police
/Spec Dept Equ
R.H.F. Inc
75.00
191110 02/18/2010 Utility Fund
191111 02/18/2010 Utility Fund
191112 02/18/2010 Utility Fund
191113 02/18/2010 Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
WaterNehicle Repairs
Water Entr. /Water Meter Re
Check Total:
BARTLEY PUMP, INC.
Check Total:
HOTSY CLEANING EQUIPMENT
Check Total:
NATIONAL METER & AUTOMATION
Check Total:
Water Entr. /Office Supplie OFFICE DEPOT
Check Total:
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 1
619.17
3,250.00
3,250.00
1,041.53
1,041.53
1,037.88
1,037.88
267.87
267.87
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
191114
02/18/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
191114
02/18/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
Check Total:
211.86 .
191115
02/18/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SYAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
285.66
Check Total:
285.66
191116
02/18/2010
General Fund
Data Processing /Telephone
AT &T
5,263.25
Check Total:
5,263.25
191117
02/18/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
26.55
191117
02/18/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
30.33
191117
02/18/2010
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Telephone
AT &T
7.58
191117
02/18/2010
General Fund
Pac /Telephone
AT &T
3.79
191117
02/18/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Telephone
AT &T
7.58
Check Total:
75.83
191118
02/18/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Telephone
AT &T
15.44
191118
02/18/2010
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North /Telephone
AT &T
67.23
Check Total:
82.67
191119
02/18/2010
General Fund
Contrct/Classes /Contractual S
RAIZELAH BAYEN
826.07
Check Total:
826.07
191120
02/18/2010
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
SHERRY BLANCHARD
2,096.25
Check Total:
2,096.25
191121
02/18/2010
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
PETE BREELAND
78.00
Check Total:
78.00
191122
02/18/2010
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Bldg/Facilty
CAL -STEAM #2504
367.42
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 2
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 3
Check Total:
367.42
191123
02/18/2010
General Fund
Ceramics Studio -Cont Svcs
MICHELE CARTER
481.00
Check Total:
481.00
191124
02/18/2010
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
Gale Davis
464.75
191124
02/18/2010
General Fund
Contrct/Classes /Contractual S
Gale Davis
1,010.75
Check Total:
1,475.50
191125
02/18/2010
General Fund
Contrct/Classes /Contractual S
GAY DAWSON
156.65
Check Total:
156.65
191126
02/18/2010
General Fund
STEVE GOSSAGE
514.27
Check Total:
514.27
191127
02/18/2010
General Fund
Non- Department /Self - Insured
HOTSY CLEANING EQUIPMENT
446.37
Check Total:
446.37
191128
02/18/2010
General Fund
Ref Deposit -Liao. Insur
HUB INTERNATIONAL
700.00
191128
02/18/2010
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
HUB INTERNATIONAL
- 700.00
191128
02/18/2010
General Fund
Cash
HUB INTERNATIONAL
700.00
191128
02/18/2010
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Rp Community
HUB INTERNATIONAL
-52.53
Check Total:
647.47
191129
02/18/2010
General Fund
—
CHERIE JONES
438.52
Check Total:
438.52
191130
02/18/2010
General Fund
Non - Department /Self - Insured
KELLY -MOORE PAINT COMPANY INC.
105.70
Check Total
105.70
191131
02/18/2010
General Fund
Contrct/Classes /Contractual S
FRANK KRUZIC
97.50
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 3
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 4
Check Total:
97.50
191132
02/18/2010
General Fund
Contrct/Classes /Contractual S
SIENA MC CARTHY
78.00
Check Total:
78.00
191133
02/18/2010
General Fund
Storm Drain/Bldg Facility
Miksis Service Inc
3,500.00
Check Total:
3,500.00
191134
02/18/2010
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
NORTH BAY KUNG FU
572.00
Check Total:
572.00
191135
02/18/2010
General Fund
SEAN O'DONNELL
229.00
Check Total:
229.00
191136
02/18/2010
General Fund
KRISTINA OWENS
500.00
191136
02/18/2010
General Fund
KRISTINA OWENS
270.50
191136
02/18/2010
General Fund
KRISTINA OWENS
105.97
Check Total:
876.47
191137
02/18/2010
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
PETALUMA SCHOOL OF BALLET
725.40
Check Total:
725.40
191138
02/18/2010
General Fund
Storm Drain/Bldg Facility
RAIN FOR RENT
401.22
Check Total:
401.22
191139
02/18/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,129.72
Check Total:
1,129.72
191140
02/18/2010
General Fund
City Manager /Travels & Mee
DANIEL SCHWARZ
544.70
Check Total:
544.70
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 4
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
191141
02/18/2010
General Fund
Rec Ref Clearing
NORMA SUAREZ
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
191142
02/18/2010
General Fund
Contrct/Classes /Contractual S
PAT TYLER
286.00
Check Total:
286.00
191143
02/18/2010
General Fund
Inspection /Professional
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
18.80
Check Total:
18.80
191144
02/19/2010
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
ESA
11,821.88
Check Total:
11,821.88
191145
02/19/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
GRAINGER, INC.
30.61
Check Total:
30.61
191146
02/19/2010
Utility Fund
Water Emr. /Spec Dept Equ
WEST COAST GRAPHICS
54.50
Check Total:
54.50
191147
02/19/2010
General Fund
Traffic Signals /Contractual S
GRAINGER, INC.
120.96
Check Total:
120.96
191148
02/19/2010
General Fund
Data Processing /Contractual S
Granicus Inc
700.00
Check Total:
700.00
191149
02/19/2010
General Fund
Non - Department /Self - Insured
KELLY -MOORE PAINT COMPANY INC.
38.40
Check Total:
38.40
191150
02/19/2010
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
RELIABLE HARDWARE & STEEL CO.
24.02
Check Total:
24.02
191151
02/19/2010
General Fund
T &E - City Represesentation
ROHNERT PARK CHAMBER
OF
41.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 5
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
191151
02/19/2010
General Fund
191151
02/19/2010
General Fund
191152
02/19/2010
General Fund
191152
02/19/2010
General Fund
191153
02/19/2010
General Fund
191154
02/24/2010
General Fund
191155
02/24/2010
General Fund
191156
02/24/2010
General Fund
191157
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
191158
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
191158
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
191159
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
191160
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM )
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
City Council /Travel- Belforte
ROHNERT PARK CHAMBER OF
41.00
Non - Department /Travels & Mee
ROHNERT PARK CHAMBER
OF
41.00
Check Total:
123.00
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY
793.52
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY
793.52
Check Total:
1,587.04
Spay/Neuter Voucher $2
ROHNERT PARK VETERINARY CLINIC
140.00
Check Total:
140.00
Planning /Contractual S
DYETT & BHATIA
2,047.10
Check Total:
2,047.10
Police /Spec. Departm
NEWCAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
200.00
Check Total:
200.00
Animal Shltr Training Fee Dep
DAWN KEEGAN
60.00
Check Total:
60.00
Sewer Entr. /Spec. Departm
GRAINGER, INC.
17.68
Check Total:
17.68
Sewer Emr. /Spec. Departm
HOME DEPOT
-19.59
Sewer Entr. /Spec. Departm
HOME DEPOT
20.00
Check Total:
0.41
Sewer Emr. /Vehicle Repair
Redwood Coast Petroleum
64.63
Check Total:
64.63
Sewer Entr. /Laguna Plant/
CITY OF SANTA ROSA
742,444.95
Page 6
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
191161 02/24/2010 Utility Fund
191162 02/24/2010 Utility Fund
191163 02/24/2010 Utility Fund
191164 02/24/2010 Utility Fund
191165 02/24/2010 Utility Fund
191165 02/24/2010 Utility Fund
191165 02/24/2010 Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Contractual S
Sewer Entr. /Clothing Allow
Water Entr. /Miscellaneous
Check Total:
SPRINGBROOK SOFTWARE
Check Total:
SUNSET LINEN SERVICE
Check Total:
CA HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Check Total:
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm FARM PLAN
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm GRAINGER, INC.
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm GRAINGER, INC.
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm GRAINGER, INC.
Check Total:
742,444.95
225.00
225.00
45.00
45.00
70.00
70.00
354.25
354.25
142.14
34.47
25.72
Check Total:
202.33
191166
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
GROENIGER & COMPANY
186.84
191166
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
GROENIGER & COMPANY
373.68
191166
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
GROENIGER & COMPANY
93.04
191166
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
GROENIGER & COMPANY
322.25
Check Total:
975.81
191167
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water/Vehicle Repairs
Redwood Coast Petroleum
64.64
Check Total:
64.64
191168
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
Check Total:
105.93
191169
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
SIGN DYNAMICS
109.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM)
Page 7
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
109.00
191170
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Contractual S
SPRINGBROOK SOFTWARE
225.00
Check Total:
225.00
191171
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water /Clothing Allowance
SUNSET LINEN SERVICE
36.25
Check Total:
36.25
191172
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SYAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
400.25
Check Total:
400.25
191173
02/24/2010
General Fund
Finance /Contractual S
ACCOUNTEMPS
1,080.00
Check Total:
1,080.00
191174
02/24/2010
General Fund
DENNIS AMANTITE
555.01
Check Total:
555.01
191175
02/24/2010
General Fund
Non - Department /Training & Edu
TORRI AMATO
125.00
191175
02/24/2010
General Fund
Non - Department /Training & Edu
TORRI AMATO
129.00
Check Total:
254.00
191176
02/24/2010
General Fund
JOHN ANGLIN
578.40
Check Total:
578.40
191177
02/24/2010
General Fund
City Hall Annex /Telephone
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
64.60
191177
02/24/2010
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Telephone
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
43.07
191177
02/24/2010
General Fund
Pac /Telephone
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
21.53
191177
02/24/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
86.14
191177
02/24/2010
General Fund
Police /Telephone
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
172.28
191177
02/24/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Telephone
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
43.07
Check Total: 430.69
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 8
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
191178
02/24/2010
General Fund
191179
02/24/2010
General Fund
191180
02/24/2010
General Fund
191181
02/24/2010
General Fund
191182
02/24/2010
General Fund
191183
02/24/2010
General Fund
191183
02/24/2010
General Fund
191184
02/24/2010
General Fund
191185
02/24/2010
General Fund
191185
02/24/2010
General Fund
191186
02/24/2010
General Fund
191187
02/24/2010
General Fund
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM )
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Page 9
JERRY BICK
72.80
Check Total:
72.80
Non - Department /Self - Insured
BUCHANAN FOOD SERVICE
85.06
Check Total:
85.06
PETER M. CALLINAN
239.11
Check Total:
239.11
Non -Dept Leases/Transfer Out
CITICAPITAL
7,734.42
Check Total:
7,734.42
Police /Uniforms
THE COBBLER
216.91
Check Total:
216.91
Inspection /Professional
CODE SOURCE
900.00
Inspection /Professional
CODE SOURCE
552.70
Check Total:
1,452.70
Non - Department /Advertising/P
COMMUNITY VOICE
379.50
Check Total:
379.50
Trees & Parkwys /Spec. Departm
FARM PLAN
83.13
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
FARM PLAN
5.80
Check Total:
88.93
City Hall /Postage
FEDEX
239.06
Check Total:
239.06
City Hall Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
39.00
Page 9
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 10
Check Total:
39.00
191188
02/24/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
FIRST CHOICE
33.73
191188
02/24/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
FIRST CHOICE
67.73
Check Total:
101.46
191189
02/24/2010
General Fund
Non - Department /Self- Insured
GRAINGER, INC.
46.57
191189
02/24/2010
General Fund
H Pool Bldg/Facilty
GRAINGER, INC.
128.57
Check Total:
175.14
191190
02/24/2010
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Spec. Departm
HOME DEPOT
22.29
Check Total:
22.29
191191
02/24/2010
General Fund
Comm Cntr Grnds /Spec. Departm
HORIZON /AUTOMATIC RAIN
109.21
Check Total:
109.21
191192
02/24/2010
General Fund
Non - Department /Training & Edu
AARON JOHNSON
1,961.10
Check Total:
1,961.10
191193
02/24/2010
General Fund
CHERIE JONES
90.00
Check Total:
90.00
191194
02/24/2010
General Fund
Animal Shelter Fees
DAWN KEEGAN
95.00
Check Total:
95.00
191195
02/24/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen
TOM KELLEY
147.15
Check Total:
147.15
191196
02/24/2010
General Fund
Pac /City Events /Contractual S
BRIAN MC CARTHY
122.50
Check Total:
122.50
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 10
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name .
Amount
191202
02/24/2010
Capital Projects Fund
191202
02/24/2010
Capital Projects Fund
191197
02/24/2010
Capital Projects Fund
City Hall Acquisition/Renov
MC KIM DESIGN GROUP
654.41
191197
02/24/2010
Capital Projects Fund
City Hall Acquisition/Renov
MC KIM DESIGN GROUP
925.23
191197
02/24/2010
Capital Projects Fund
City Hall Acquisition/Renov
MC KIM DESIGN GROUP
850.66
Check Total:
2,430.30
191198
02/24/2010
General Fund
Non- Department /Self - Insured
MOST DEPENDABLE
119.00
191199 02/24/2010 General Fund
191200 02/24/2010 General Fund
191200 02/24/2010 General Fund
191201 02/24/2010 General Fund
191202
02/24/2010
Capital Projects Fund
191202
02/24/2010
Capital Projects Fund
191202
02/24/2010
Capital Projects Fund
191202
02/24/2010
Capital Projects Fund
191202
02/24/2010
General Fund
191203 02/24/2010 General Fund
191204 02/24/2010 1 General Fund
191205 02/24/2010 General Fund
Check Total:
Animal Shelter Fees CHERYL MOUTON
Check Total:
City Hall /Office Supplie National Document Solutions, L
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm National Document Solutions, L
Check Total:
Pac/Pasco /Advertising/P NORTH BAY BOHEMIAN
Northeast Dist. Specific Plan
Sonoma Mtn Village Project
Southeast Dist. Specific Plan
University Dist. Specific Plan
Planning /Contractual S
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
Non - Department /Audit Fees
Check Total:
NORTH FORK ASSOCIATES
NORTH FORK ASSOCIATES
NORTH FORK ASSOCIATES
NORTH FORK ASSOCIATES
NORTH FORK ASSOCIATES
Check Total:
Old Adobe Development Services
Check Total:
OUM
DELANE E. PATTON
Check Total:
119.00
95.00
95.00
434.40
29.80
464.20
266.48
266.48
6,305.25
6,205.00
2,416.50
283.50
7,812.25
23,022.50
3,708.33
3,708.33
5,000.00
5,000.00
441.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 11
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
191206 02/24/2010 General Fund
191206 02/24/2010 General Fund
191206 02/24/2010 General Fund
191207 02/24/2010 General Fund
191207 02/24/2010 General Fund
191208 02/24/2010 General Fund
191209
02/24/2010
General Fund
191209
02/24/2010
General Fund
191209
02/24/2010
General Fund
191209
02/24/2010
General Fund
191209
02/24/2010
General Fund
191209
02/24/2010
General Fund
191209
02/24/2010
General Fund
191210
02/24/2010
General Fund
191210
02/24/2010
General Fund
191210
02/24/2010
General Fund
191210
02/24/2010
General Fund
191211 02/24/2010 General Fund
191212 02/24/2010 General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Pac/Pasco /Production
Theatre /'Travels & Mee
Pac /Facility Repa
Ps Main Station Bldg/Facilty
City Hall /Fac Maint/Non-
Police /Armory
Police Nehicle Repai
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Fire Nehicle Repai
Police /Gas & Oil
Police /Gas & Oil
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PLATT
PLATT
Proforce Law Enforcement
Redwood Coast Petroleum
Redwood Coast Petroleum
Redwood Coast Petroleum
Redwood Coast Petroleum
Redwood Coast Petroleum
Redwood Coast Petroleum
Redwood Coast Petroleum
Check Total: 441.00
16.60
2.00
33.14
Check Total: 51.74
109.25
11.06
Check Total: 120.31
1,047.93
Check Total: 1,047.93
64.64
64.64
64.64
917.90
799.28
564.86
1,019.79
Check Total:
Street Lighting /Contractual S
REPUBLIC ITS
Street Lighting /Contractual S
REPUBLIC ITS
Traffic Signals /Contractual S
REPUBLIC ITS
Traffic Signals /Contractual S
REPUBLIC ITS
Check Total:
Travel/Mtgs- Mackenzie
ROHNERT PARK CHAMBER OF
Check Total:
PAULSKANCHY
3,495.75
4,482.21
275.00
2,028.10
2,631.00
9,416.31
41.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 12
41.00
292.59
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name
Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 13
Check Total:
292.59
191213
02/24/2010
General Fund
Finance /Travels & Mee
ANGELA D. SMITH
49.25
Check Total:
49.25
191214
02/24/2010
General Fund
DOUGLAS SMITH
271.87
Check Total:
271.87
191215
02/24/2010
General Fund
Finance /Contractual S
SO CO REPROGRAPHICS
2,877.07
Check Total:
2,877.07
191216
02/24/2010
General Fund
BIA Assessment Payable
SO CO TAX COLLECTOR
56,600.09
Check Total:
56,600.09
191217
02/24/2010
General Fund
Pac/Pasco /Advertising/P
SONOMA WEST PUBLISHERS
684.90
Check Total:
684.90
191218
02/24/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Clothing Allo
SUNSET LINEN SERVICE
102.00
Check Total:
102.00
191219
02/24/2010
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
TDS - TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYS
85.54
191219
02/24/2010
General Fund
Non - Department /Self - Insured
TDS - TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYS
664.86
Check Total:
750.40
191220
02/24/2010
General Fund
Finance /Postage
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
320.00
Check Total:
320.00
191221
02/24/2010
General Fund
Recreation Adm /Travels & Mee
MAYA VAN DEN HEUVEL
36.50
Check Total:
36.50
191222
02/24/2010
General Fund
ROBERT H. WILLIAMS
1,331.38
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 13
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
1,331.38
191223
02/24/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Telephone
AT &T
0.32
Check Total:
0.32
191224
191224
191224
191224
191224
191224
191224
02/24/2010
02/24/2010
02/24/2010
02/24/2010
02/24/2010
02/24/2010
02/24/2010
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
Rec. Programs /Telephone
Ps Main Station /Telephone
Benecia Pool /Telephone
Pac /Telephone
Ps Main Station /Telephone
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Telephone
Publ Works Gen /Telephone
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
14.50
29.15
15.85
13.26
3.41
0.38
0.16
Check Total:
76.71
191225
02/24/2010
General Fund
Animal Shelter Fees
MOLLY PRIER
45.00
Check Total:
45.00
191226
191226
02/25/2010
02/25/2010
General Fund
General Fund
Aflac Payable
Aflac Payable
AFLAC
AFLAC
649.46
471.34
Check Total:
1,120.80
191227
02/25/2010
General Fund
Court Order Payable
CA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
75.00
Check Total:
75.00
191228
02/25/2010
General Fund
Emplyee Benfits /Medical Insur
HARTFORD LIFE INS
15,214.03
Check Total:
15,214.03
191229
02/25/2010
General Fund
Blue Cross W/H Payable
HSA Bank
350.00
Check Total:
350.00
191230
191230
191230
02/25/2010
02/25/2010
02/25/2010
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
Kaiser W/H Payable
Emplyee Benfits /Medical Insur
Emplyee Benfits /Medical Insur
KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC
KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC
KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC
96,248.62
1,208.40
39,454.90
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM)
Page 14
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 15
Check Total:
136,911.92
191231
02/25/2010
General Fund
Emplyee Benfits /Medical Insur
KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC
611.86
Check Total:
611.86
191232
02/25/2010
General Fund
Kaiser W/H Payable
KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC
886.92
Check Total:
886.92
191233
02/25/2010
General Fund
Def Comp Payable -Gw
NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATIO
3,422.83
Check Total:
3,422.83
191234
02/25/2010
General Fund
Def Comp Payable -Gw
NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATIO
2,235.00
Check Total:
2,235.00
191235
02/25/2010
General Fund
Prepaid Legal Services
PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
41.85
Check Total:
41.85
191236
02/25/2010
General Fund
Scope Dues Payable
SEIU Local 1021
1,036.72
Check Total:
1,036.72
191237
02/25/2010
General Fund
United Way Payable
UNITED WAY
85.00
Check Total:
85.00
191238
02/25/2010
General Fund
Eye Care/VSP/Payables
Vision Service Plan - (CA)
868.18
Check Total:
868.18
191239
02/25/2010
General Fund
Emplyee Benfits /Eye Care
Vision Service Plan - (CA)
20.92
Check Total:
20.92
191240
02/25/2010
General Fund
Emplyee Benfits /Eye Care
Vision Service Plan - (CA)
601.45
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 15
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 16
Check Total:
601.45
191241
02/26/2010
General Fund
Animal Shltr Training Fee Dep
LISA COLLODI
60.00
Check Total:
60.00
191242
02/26/2010
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
PBS &J
27,016.86
191242
02/26/2010
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
PBS &J
3,146.25
191242
02/26/2010
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
PBS &J
1,910.00
191242
02/26/2010
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
PBS &J
11,423.75
Check Total:
43,496.86
191243
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Herb Davis
295.32
191243
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Herb Davis
105.00
191243
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Herb Davis
73.13
Check Total:
473.45
191244
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Sandra Geary
40.81
Check Total:
40.81
191245
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Beth Stevens
23.59
Check Total:
23.59
191246
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Xim Weng
22.73
191246
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Xim Weng
11.60
191246
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Xim Weng
12.19
Check Total:
46.52
191247
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Maria Guzman
66.45
191247
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Maria Guzman
70.08
191247
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Maria Guzman
40.36
Check Total:
176.89
191248
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
Accounts Payable
Jason Abrao
12.32
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 16
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
191248
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
191248
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
191249
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
191250
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
191250
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
191250
03/02/2010
Utility Fund
191251
03/03/2010
General Fund
191251
03/03/2010
General Fund
191251
03/03/2010
General Fund
191252
03/03/2010
General Fund
191253
03/03/2010
General Fund
191254
03/03/2010
General Fund
191254
03/03/2010
General Fund
191255 03/03/2010 General Fund
191256 03/03/2010 General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Accounts Payable
Jason Abrao
38.51
Accounts Payable
Jason Abrao
14.59
Check Total:
65.42
Accounts Payable
Dana Rugaard
49.26
Check Total:
49.26
Accounts Payable
Realty World Benchmark
9.35
Accounts Payable
Realty World Benchmark
35.52
Accounts Payable
Realty World Benchmark
37.55
Check Total:
82.42
Center Bldg/Facilty
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
115.00
Burt/Ave Rec Cr Bldg/Facilty
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
72.00
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
144.00
Check Total:
331.00
Publ Works Gen /Vehicle Repai
ACE ELECTRIC SERVICE
240.89
Check Total:
240.89
Pac/Pasco /Admissions
ACTORS THEATRE FOR
4,084.00
Check Total:
4,084.00
Police /Vehicle Repai
ALLDATA
375.00
Publ Works Gen /Vehicle Repai
ALLDATA
375.00
Check Total:
750.00
Fire /Uniforms
ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT,
INC.
312.61
Check Total:
312.61
Ps Main Station/Cellular Phone
AMERICAN MESSAGING
166.57
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 17
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
191257 03/03/2010 General Fund
191258 03/03/2010 General Fund
191259 03/03/2010 General Fund
191260 03/03/2010 General Fund
191261 03/03/2010 General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Police /Contractual S
Police /Vehicle Repai
FRUUi.7
ANDREOLI TOWING
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Animal Control /Contractual S ANIMAL CARE CENTER OF SONOMA
Check Total:
R.P. Gymnasium /Telephone AT &T
Data Processing /Telephone AT &T
Check Total:
166.57
300.00
300.00
50.00
50.00
329.29
329.29
23.36
23.36
30.27
Check Total: 30.27
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Library /Contractual S
AT &T
30.09
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Center /Telephone
AT &T
39.94
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North /Telephone
AT &T
33.99
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Telephone
AT &T
15.71
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Data Processing /Telephone
AT &T
185.32
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
66.31
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
108.34
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
75.77
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
160.57
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
1,150.56
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Data Processing /Telephone
AT &T
797.51
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
285.81
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Data Processing /Telephone
AT &T
43.57
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Telephone
AT &T
30.16
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
558.57
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Telephone
AT &T
30.09
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
58.90
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Data Processing /Telephone
AT &T
84.87
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station /Telephone
AT &T
61.02
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 18
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Shelter /Telephone
AT &T
30.09
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
H Pool /Telephone
AT &T
15.11
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Benecia Pool /Telephone
AT &T
14.42
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
Magnolia Pool /Telephone
AT &T
14.42
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North /Telephone
AT &T
29.47
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
58.90
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
P/S Bldg -South /Telephone
AT &T
35.40
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
2.12
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
87.71
191262
03/03/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Telephone
AT &T
323.60
Check Total:
4,428.34
191263
03/03/2010
General Fund
Finance /Cellular Phone
AT &T INTERNET SVCS
750.00
Check Total:
750.00
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
City Manager /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
67.23
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
Finance /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
134.88
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
Data Processing/Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
146.71
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station/Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
1,572.37
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
City Engineer /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
187.28
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
Inspection /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
63.24
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
353.30
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
Park Maint /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
29.74
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
Mini Bus /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
57.52
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
Sports Center /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
29.10
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
68.35
191264
03/03/2010
General Fund
Planning /Cellular Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
67.23
Check Total:
2,776.95
191265
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC
84.99
Check Total:
84.99
191266
03/03/2010
General Fund
Fire /Vehicle Repai
BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL
67.56
Check Total:
67.56
191267
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control /Spec. Departm
BLADE KING SPECIALITIES
11.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 19
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Check Total:
191268
03/0312010
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
BUCHANAN FOOD SERVICE
191268
03/03/2010
General Fund
Center Bldg/Facilty
BUCHANAN FOOD SERVICE
191268
03/03/2010
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
BUCHANAN FOOD SERVICE
191268
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station Bldg/Facilty
BUCHANAN FOOD SERVICE
191274
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Postage
Check Total:
191269
03/03/2010
General Fund
Fire Nehicle Repai
BURTON'S FIRE
191269
03/03/2010
General Fund
Fire Nehicle Repai
BURTON'S FIRE
191275
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
Check Total:
191270
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Travels & Mee
BUSINESS CARD
Check Total:
191271
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police/I.D.
BUSINESS CARD
191271
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police/I.D.
BUSINESS CARD
191271
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /I.D.
BUSINESS CARD
191271
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Spec. Departm
BUSINESS CARD
Check Total:
191272
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /I.D.
BUSINESS CARD
Check Total:
191273
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Spec. Departm
Business Card
Check Total:
191274
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Postage
BUSINESS CARD
Check Total:
191275
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL
191275
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM )
11.00
774.55
56.85
947.37
133.33
1,912.10
233.11
-47.53
Page 20
185.58
725.00
725.00
3.59
40.22
66.46
131.95
242.22
357.00
357.00
32.48
32.48
33.69
33.69
4.60
91.33
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Check Total: 95.93
191276 03/03/2010 General Fund R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty CAL -STEAM #2504 219.47
191276 03/03/2010 General Fund P/S Bldg -South /Fac Maint/Non- CAL -STEAM #2504 51.47
191277 03/03/2010 General Fund
191278
191278
191278
191278
191278
191278
191278
191279
Publ Works Gen .
SEAN CAMILLERI
Check Total:
Check Total:
03/03/2010
General Fund
City Hall /Rent/Lease/Ta
CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SVCS
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Equipment Leas
CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SVCS
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control / Eqpt Lease
CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SVCS
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Rent/Lease /Ta
CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SVCS
03/03/2010
General Fund
Center /Rent/Lease/Ta
CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SVCS
03/03/2010
General Fund
Sports Center /Rent/Lease/Tax
CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SVCS
03/03/2010
General Fund
Pac /Admin /Rent/Lease /Tax
CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SVCS
03/03/2010 General Fund
191280 03/03/2010 General Fund
City Hall /Fac Maint/Non- CITY ELECTRIC SUPPLY
Publ Works Gen /Vehicle Repai CNH Capital
Check Total:
270.94
147.15
147.15
2,350.02
2,106.40
83.95
219.96
83.95
547.92
83.96
5,476.16
142.31
Check Total: 142.31
614.47
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 21
Check Total:
614.47
191281
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Licenses
LISA COLLODI
12.00
191281
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Shelter Fees
LISA COLLODI
95.00
Check Total:
107.00
191282
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control /Advertising/P
COMMUNITY VOICE
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
191283
03/03/2010
General Fund
Contrct/Classes /Contractual S
CREATIVE CERAMICS
16.62
191283
03/03/2010
General Fund
Contrct/Classes /Contractual S
CREATIVE CERAMICS
266.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 21
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
54.19
Amount
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
GRAINGER, INC.
3.91
191290
191283
03/03/2010
General Fund
Contrct/Classes /Contractual S
CREATIVE CERAMICS
191290
381.39
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
GRAINGER, INC.
14.89
191290
Check Total:
664.01
191284
03/03/2010
General Fund
Non - Department /Election Expe
DFM ASSOCIATES
General Fund
159.78
GRAINGER, INC.
80.70
Check Total:
159.78
191285
03/03/2010
General Fund
Pac/Pasco /Production
DRAMATISTS PLAY SERVICE, INC.
960.74
31.75
Check Total:
960.74
191286
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
EUREKA OXYGEN CO
35.33
Check Total:
35.33
191287
03/03/2010
General Fund
City Hall Annex Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
84.00
Check Total:
84.00
191288
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control /Shelter Food
FRIZELLE -ENOS
37.80
191288
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control /Spec. Departm
FRIZELLE -ENOS
41.16
191288
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control/Shelter Food
FRIZELLE -ENDS
49.67
191288
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control /Spec. Departm
FRIZELLE -ENOS
116.91
Check Total:
245.54
191289
03/03/2010
General Fund
STEVE GOSSAGE
500.00
Check Total: 500.00
191290
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station Bldg/Facilty
GRAINGER, INC.
54.19
191290
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
GRAINGER, INC.
3.91
191290
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
GRAINGER, INC.
135.53
191290
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
GRAINGER, INC.
14.89
191290
03/03/2010
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
GRAINGER, INC.
29.77
191290
03/03/2010
General Fund
H Pool Bldg/Facilty
GRAINGER, INC.
80.70
Check Total:
318.99
191291
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
HANSEL FORD
31.75
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM)
Page 22
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
191291
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Vehicle Repai
HANSEL FORD
446.68
191291
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Vehicle Repai
HANSEL FORD
1,754.56
191294
03/03/2010
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Check Total:
2,232.99
191292
03/03/2010
General Fund
OES Vehicle
CITY OF HEALDSBURG
2,690.44
Check Total:
2,690.44
191293
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control /Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
31.92
191293
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control /Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
38.15
191293
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control/Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
34.79
191293
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control/Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
76.31
191294
03/03/2010
General Fund
Benecia Rec Bld Bldg/Facilty
191294
03/03/2010
General Fund
Center Bldg/Facilty
191294
03/03/2010
General Fund
Animal Control Bldg/Facilty
191294
03/03/2010
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
191294
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station Bldg/Facilty
191294
03/03/2010
General Fund
Burt/Ave Rec Cr Bldg/Facilty
191295 03/03/2010 General Fund
191295 03/03/2010 General Fund
191296 03/03/2010 General Fund
191297
03/03/2010
General Fund
191297
03/03/2010
General Fund
191298
03/03/2010
General Fund
191298
03/03/2010
General Fund
191298
03/03/2010
General Fund
Non - Department /Self - Insured
Non - Department /Self - Insured
Check Total:
THE HITMEN TERMITE & PEST
THE HITMEN TERMITE & PEST
THE HITMEN TERMITE & PEST
THE HITMEN TERMITE & PEST
THE HITMEN TERMITE & PEST
THE HITMEN TERMITE & PEST
HOME DEPOT
HOME DEPOT
Trees & Parkwys /Spec. Departm HORIZON /AUTOMATIC RAIN
Park Maint /C/0-Equipment
Park Maint /C/0-Equipment
Non - Department /Self - Insured
Non - Department /Self - Insured
Non - Department /Self - Insured
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
John Deere Co
John Deere Co
Check Total:
KELLY -MOORE PAINT COMPANY INC.
KELLY -MOORE PAINT COMPANY INC.
KELLY -MOORE PAINT COMPANY INC.
181.17
75.00
60.00
80.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
395.00
11.91
3.43
15.34
16.75
16.75
16,161.79
7.00
16,168.79
32.79
26.73
5.98
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 23
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
191299
03/03/2010
Capital Projects Fund
191300
03/03/2010
General Fund
191301
03/03/2010
General Fund
191302
03/03/2010
General Fund
191303 03/03/2010 General Fund
191304 03/03/2010 General Fund
191305
03/03/2010
General Fund
191305
03/03/2010
General Fund
191305
03/03/2010
General Fund
191305
03/03/2010
General Fund
191305
03/03/2010
General Fund
191305
03/03/2010
General Fund
191305
03/03/2010
General Fund
191305
03/03/2010
General Fund
191305
03/03/2010
General Fund
191306
03/03/2010
General Fund
191306
03/03/2010
General Fund
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM )
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Page 24
Check Total:
65.50
City Hall Acquisition/Renov
KEMA INC
5,518.00
Check Total:
5,518.00
Animal Control /Contractual S
KOEFRAN INDUSTRIES
115.00
Check Total:
115.00
Non - Department /Travels & Mee
ELIZABETH LIDSTER
44.00
Check Total:
44.00
Data Processing /Contractual S
MC AFEE INC
1,790.00
Check Total:
1,790.00
P/S Personnel
CHRISTOPHER MEDINA
150.00
Check Total:
150.00
Non - Department /Spec. Departm
National Document Solutions, L
509.54
Check Total:
509.54
Pac /Admin /Rent/Lease/Tax
NEWCAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
71.33
Police /Equipment Leas
NEWCAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
626.65
City Hall /Rent/Lease /Ta
NEWCAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
699.71
Recreation Adm /Rent/Lease/Tax
NEWCAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
71.33
Youth & Fam Svc/Equipment Leas
NEWCAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
71.33
Center /Rent/Lease/Ta
NEWCAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
71.33
Publ Works Gen /Rent/Lease/Ta
NEWCAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
71.33
Animal Control / Eqpt Lease
NEWCAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
71.33
Sports Center /Rent/Lease/Tax
NEWCAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
71.33
Check Total:
1,825.67
Pac /Admin /Office Supplie
OFFICE DEPOT
54.07
Sports Center /Office Supplie
OFFICE DEPOT
32.82
Page 24
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
191307
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
191308 03/03/2010 General Fund
Honeybee Park /Heat/Light/Po
Ladybug Park Heat/Light/Powe
Sunrise Park /Heat/Light/Po
M Park /Heat/Light/Po
Rainbow Park /Heat/Light/Po
Center /Heat/Light/Po
Alicia Pool /Heat/Light/Po
Benecia Pool /Heat/Light/Po
Ladybug Pool /Heat/Light/Po
H Pool /Heat/Light/Po
R.P. Gymnasium /Heat/Light/Po
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Heat/Light/Po
Magnolia Pool /Heat/Light/Pow
Burt/Ave Rec Cr /Heat/Light/Po
Pac /Heat/Light/Po
Sign/Heat Light & Power
City Hall /Heat/Light/Po
City Hall Annex /Heat/Light/Po
Non - Department /Heat/Light/Po
Animal Shelter /Heat/Light/Pow
Ps Main Station /Heat/Light/Po
P/S Bldg -North /Heat/Light/Po
P/S Bldg -South /Heat/Light/Po
Publ Works Gen /Heat/Light/Po
Trees & Parkwys /Heat/Light/Po
School Grounds /Heat/Light/Po
Street Lighting /Heat/Light/Po
Traffic Signals /Heat/Light/Po
Alicia Park /Heat/Light/Po
Benecia Park /Heat/Light/Po
Caterpillr Park /Heat/Light/Po
ColegioN Park /Heat/Light/Po
Dorotea Park /Heat/Light/Po
Eagle Park /Heat/Light/Po
Golis Park /Heat/Light/Po
Check Total:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
R.P. Gymnasium /Concession Pu PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
Check Total:
86.89
193.04
486.76
109.03
1,166.15
23.33
1,555.90
24.90
379.73
45.22
5,890.94
750.64
4,804.98
282.86
419.45
3,038.33
553.86
317.95
1,097.04
32.93
1,166.66
7,210.22
1,038.66
254.78
675.98
656.07
34.07
12,561.81
1,375.31
177.53
48.72
9.90
68.13
72.87
116.62
338.01
46,978.38
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 25
284.26
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Check Total: 284.26
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
PETTY CASH
10.89
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
Fire Nehicle Repai
PETTY CASH
8.92
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Office Supplie
PETTY CASH
47.94
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Postage
PETTY CASH
44.00
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
PETTY CASH
26.15
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Bldg/Facilty
PETTY CASH
10.00
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
PETTY CASH
34.88
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
Center Bldg/Facilty
PETTY CASH
9.56
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
H Pool Bldg/Facilty
PETTY CASH
2.58
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
PETTY CASH
12.62
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
Burt/Ave Rec Cr Bldg/Facilty
PETTY CASH
6.53
191309
03/03/2010
General Fund
Library /Fac Maint/Non-
PETTY CASH
19.15
Check Total:
233.22
191310
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Armory
Proforce Law Enforcement
1,109.42
Check Total:
1,109.42
191311
03/03/2010
General Fund
Non - Department /Spec. Departm
PRUDENT PUBLISHING COMPANY
621.71
Check Total:
621.71
191312
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1.,478.79
191312
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
542.99
191312
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
916.45
191312
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,071.63
Check Total:
4,009.86
191313
03/03/2010
General Fund
EAP Expense
REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INS.
842.19
Check Total.
842.19
191314
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
REDWOOD LOCK
28.52
191314
03/03/2010
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
REDWOOD LOCK
2.73
191314
03/03/2010
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
REDWOOD LOCK
2.73
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 26
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 27
Check Total:
33.98
191315
03/03/2010
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
RELIABLE HARDWARE & STEEL CO.
37.89
Check Total:
37.89
191316
03/03/2010
General Fund
OES Vehicle
ROHNERT PARK PUBLIC
2,690.44
191316
03/03/2010
General Fund
OES Vehicle
ROHNERT PARK PUBLIC
888.38
Check Total:
3,578.82
191317
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
SAFETY -KLEEN CORP
256.22
191317
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
SAFETY -KLEEN CORP
55.96
191317
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
SAFETY -KLEEN CORP
55.95
Check Total:
368.13
191318
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
SANTA ROSA AUTO PARTS
135.25
191318
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
SANTA ROSA AUTO PARTS
127.90
191318
03/03/2010
General Fund
Non- Department Nehicle Repai
SANTA ROSA AUTO PARTS
78.93
191318
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
SANTA ROSA AUTO PARTS
32.01
191318
03/03/2010
General Fund
Fire Nehicle Repai
SANTA ROSA AUTO PARTS
22.46
191318
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
SANTA ROSA AUTO PARTS
27.05
Check Total:
423.60
191319
03/03/2010
General Fund
Benecia Pool Bldg/Facilty
SIERRA CHEMICAL COMPANY
257.65
191319
03/03/2010
General Fund
H Pool Bldg/Facilty
SIERRA CHEMICAL COMPANY
1,809.38
191319
03/03/2010
General Fund
Magnolia Pool /Fac Maintenanc
SIERRA CHEMICAL COMPANY
257.65
Check Total:
2,324.68
191320
03/03/2010
General Fund
Ps Main Station/Fac Maint/Non-
SO CO EMERGENCY SERVICES
578.00
191320
03/03/2010
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North /Fac Maint/Non-
SO CO EMERGENCY SERVICES
578.00
Check Total:
1,156.00
191321
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Clothing Allo
SUNSET LINEN SERVICE
137.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 27
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 28
Check Total:
137.00
191322
03/03/2010
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
SYAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
92.60
Check Total:
92.60
191323
03/03/2010
General Fund
Fire /Vehicle Repai
Traction of Santa Rosa
86.55
191323
03/03/2010
General Fund
Fire /Vehicle Repai
Traction of Santa Rosa
38.32
191323
03/03/2010
General Fund
Fire /Vehicle Repai
Traction of Santa Rosa
32.26
Check Total:
157.13
191324
03/03/2010
General Fund
Data Processing/Cellular Phone
VERIZON WIRELESS
180.04
191324
03/03/2010
General Fund
Police / Cell Phone
VERIZON WIRELESS
90.02
191324
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Cellular Phone
VERIZON WIRELESS
45.01
Check Total:
315.07
191325
03/03/2010
General Fund
Data Processing /Contractual S
Vision Internet
200.00
Check Total:
200.00.
191326
03/03/2010
General Fund
P/S Bldg -North Bldg/Facilty
WAL -MART COMMUNITY BRC
140.60
191326
03/03/2010
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
WAL -MART COMMUNITY BRC
13.32
Check Total:
153.92
191327
03/03/2010
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
WEST COAST GRAPHICS
337.88
191327
03/03/2010
General Fund
Trees & Parkwys /Spec. Departm
WEST COAST GRAPHICS
158.27
Check Total:
496.15
191328
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Small Tools
WEST COUNTY TOOL &
29.30
Check Total:
29.30
191329
03/03/2010
Capital Projects Fund
09 American Recov Act St Maint
WESTERN TECHNOLOGIES
INC
1,740.00
Check Total:
1,740.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM ) Page 28
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
191330
03/03/2010
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Fuel Tank Mai
WINZLER & KELLY
3,269.82
Check Total:
3,269.82
191331
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water/Vehicle Repairs
ALLDATA
375.00
Check Total:
375.00
191332
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water /Cell Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
269.63
Check Total:
269.63
191333
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Professional
CALTEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
882.00
Check Total:
882.00
191334
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Rent/Lease /Ta
DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES
829.20
191334
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Rent/Lease/Ta
DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES
394.70
Check Total:
1,223.90
191335
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
124.50
191335
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
228.00
Check Total:
352.50
191336
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
GRAINGER, INC.
11.67
191336
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
GRAINGER, INC.
41.85
191336
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
GRAINGER, INC.
496.39
Check Total:
549.91
191337
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
GROENIGER & COMPANY
39.16
Check Total:
39.16
191338
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
HOME DEPOT
79.42
191338
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
HOME DEPOT
186.78
Check Total:
266.20
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 29
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
191339
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Heat/Light/Po
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
4,227.94
Check Total:
4,227.94
191340
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
PEP BOYS
33.25
Check Total:
33.25
191341
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
PETTY CASH
20.00
Check Total:
20.00
191342
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
VEHICLE GAS & OIL
Redwood Coast Petroleum
735.60
Check Total:
735.60
191343
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
REDWOOD LOCK
4.63
191343
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Emr. /Spec. Departm
REDWOOD LOCK
112.70
Check Total:
117.33
191344
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
RELIABLE HARDWARE & STEEL CO.
13.82
Check Total:
13.82
191345
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
SANTA ROSA AUTO PARTS
135.24
191345
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
SANTA ROSA AUTO PARTS
146.02
191345
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
SANTA ROSA AUTO PARTS
388.91
Check Total:
670.17
191346
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water /Clothing Allowance
SANTA ROSA SHOES
297.90
191346
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water /Clothing Allowance
SANTA ROSA SHOES
- 149.44
191346
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water /Clothing Allowance
SANTA ROSA SHOES
122.90
Check Total:
271.36
191347
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
191347
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
191347
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
191347
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM)
Page 30
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
191347
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
191347
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
191347
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
86.67
191347
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
191347
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SHAMROCK MATERIALS 68661
105.93
Check Total:
934.11
191348
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water /Clothing Allowance
SUNSET LINEN SERVICE
36.25
°
Check Total:
36.25
191349
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
SYAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
390.04
Check Total:
390.04
191350
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Water/Vehicle Repairs
VICTORY AUTO PLAZA
28.33
Check Total:
191351
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Vehicle Repair
ALLDATA
375.00
Check Total:
375.00
191352
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Telephone
AT &T
90.73
191352
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Telephone
AT &T
29.62
191352
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Emr. /Telephone
AT &T
15.71
191352
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Telephone
AT &T
66.31
191352
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Telephone
AT &T
94.03
191352
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Telephone
AT &T
2,205.88
Check Total:
2,502.28
191353
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer /Cell Phone
AT &T MOBILITY
209.56
Check Total:
209.56
191354
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
124.50
191354
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
1,152.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM) Page 31
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
1,276.50
191355
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Spec. Departm
GRAINGER INC.
15.31
191355
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Spec. Departm
GRAINGER, INC.
46.68
Check Total:
61.99
191356
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Heat/Light/Po
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
173.67
191356
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Heat/Light/Po
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
5,998.39
Check Total:
6,172.06
191357
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Vehicle Gas
& Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
735.61
Check Total:
735.61
191358
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Clothing Allow
SUNSET LINEN SERVICE
45.00
Check Total:
45.00
191359
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
Nehicle Repair
TDS - TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYS
-99.75
191359
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
Nehicle Repair
TDS - TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYS
355.04
Check Total:
255.29
191360
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
Nehicle Repair
VICTORY AUTO PLAZA
56.66
Check Total:
56.66
191361
03/03/2010
Utility Fund
Sewer Emr.
/Miscellaneous
WEST COAST GRAPHICS
212.55
Check Total:
212.55
Report Total:
1,280,578.09
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:13 PM)
Page 32
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
BILLS FOR APPROVAL
Checks 5488 -5498
Dated February 18- March 3, 2010
March 16, 2010
$8,947.31
TOTAL $8,947.31
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name
Vendor Name Amount
5496 03/03/2010 Redevelopment General Fund Contractual Services
5497 03/03/2010 Redevelopment General Fund Travels & Meetings
5498 03/03/2010 Low & Moderate Income Housing Contractual Services
Check Total:
985.25
HUPPE LANDSCAPE CO INC
100.00
Check Total:
100.00
ROHNERT PARK CHAMBER OF
50.00
Check Total:
50.00
HUPPE LANDSCAPE CO INC
200.00
Check Total:
200.00
Report Total:
8,947.31
AP - Checks for Approval ( 03/03/2010 - 2:07 PM )
Page 2
Workforce Reduction
Rent City Hall Annex
Non Departmental Reduction
Public Safety Operational Savings
Public Safety Building Maintenance
Renegotiated CAD /RMS Contract
Reassign Officer to Computer Task Force
PAC Rental Only
Decommission A & L Pools
Temporary Closure of M Pool
Eliminate Morning Lap Swim
Turn Off Court Lighting
Decommission Spas
Close Park Bathrooms
In -house Street Light Maintenance
Implement Warehouse
Eliminate Maint. Program Purchase
Eliminate Shop Lift Purchase
Scanning Technican Position Frozen
Building Inspection Changes
TOTAL
r�
May -10
In process
Currently Closed
March -10
April -10
April -10
April -10
May -10
September -10
GENERAL FUND
BUDGET REDUCTIONS
2009 -10
2010 -11
GF SAVINGS
GF SAVINGS
145,000
297,000
2,500
30,000
5,500
200,000
100,000
15,000
50,000
15,000
171000
35,000
20,000
5,000 10,000
402,500 1,012,000
Distr. @)Vltg. Of:
/-r�ric aT1o. �
cc:
File:
File:
NOTES
would not open in June
3 months savings (more heat loss in winter months)
2 months savings
Parts, contracted services only
65 - 75,000 /year contracted services
Savings in bulk purchases - labor redistributed to other areas
Will not purchase
Will not purchase
50,000
80,000
100,000
15,000
5,500
65,000
4,000
15,000
2,500
15,000
2,500
15,000
3,500
25,000
10,000
70,000
25,000
171000
35,000
20,000
5,000 10,000
402,500 1,012,000
Distr. @)Vltg. Of:
/-r�ric aT1o. �
cc:
File:
File:
NOTES
would not open in June
3 months savings (more heat loss in winter months)
2 months savings
Parts, contracted services only
65 - 75,000 /year contracted services
Savings in bulk purchases - labor redistributed to other areas
Will not purchase
Will not purchase
Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park MuniciDal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
{This sectionfor City Clerk Use Only}
3/9/10 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 7,3
RESOLUTION NO, 2010-20
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date: March 9, 2010
Department: Administration
Submitted By: Dan Schwarz, Interim City Manager
Submittal Date: March 4, 20 I 0
Agenda Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AMENDING THE OUTLINE OF CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT, FRINGE
BENEFITS, AND SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT UNIT TO REMOVE
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
FILL THE POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY THROUGH OF AN
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
Requested Council Action: Approve attached resolution.
Summary:
In 2009, occupants of the positions of Public Safety Commander and Public Safety Lieutenant completed
the process to become a represented bargaining group, the Rohnel1 Park Public Safety Managers
Association. As a result of this action, the existing Management Unit is comprised of unrepresented
miscellaneous managers and one sworn officer, the Director of Public Safety. There are differences in the
employment arrangements for miscellaneous and sworn staff members that make inclusion of one sworn
officer in the Management Unit cumbersome. A recent example is the Council's approval of a furlough
program for miscellaneous managers. The Director of Public Safety cannot be furloughed, as he needs to
be available to the City at all times. As a result, the current Director, Brian Masterson, has not been
subject to the furlough program.
Statewide, it is increasingly common for police chiefs and fire chiefs to be employed through an at-will
contract to the City Manager. A chief is a unique position in the City structure - an individual that serves
the Council through the City Manager but is also an important and distinct entity in the community. An
employment contract creates greater accountability in the employment relationship. It also provides
greater flexibility to the City in attracting and retaining qualified individuals.
The attached resolution would remove the position of Director of Public Safety from the Management
Unit. It would also authorize the City Manager to employ the current and future Directors of Public
Safety through an at-will contract arrangement. The City Council would still retain considerable
Employment Arrangement for Director of Public Safety
Page 2
influence on the employment arrangement in that it would authorize the budgeted amount to compensate
the Director of Public Safety.
Director Masterson is eager to contribute to the City's fiscal recovery by implementing the concession he
offered publically at a Council meeting in the fall - that he will pay 9% of his salary toward his pension
cost under the California Public Employees' Retirement Fund (CaIPERS). Nine-percent is the current
employee's share for a sworn officer. An employment contract will allow Director Masterson to make
such a concession.
For the Council's information, Director Masterson and I are reviewing final language of a contract that
would have the following terms:
Term: Effective Date to April 2, 2013.
Arrangement: At-will to City Manager; severance of 6 months if terminated without cause.
Salary: $13,460 per month (current salary).
Benefits: The current benefit package, plus $3,000 annually for professional development.
Future changes made to Management Unit benefits will apply to the Director of
Public Safety. Director Masterson will pay 9% of his salary toward CalPERS
costs through December 31, 2011.
Fiscal Impact: The terms of the employment contract will net an approximate General Fund savings of
$20,000 through December 31, 20 II.
Enclosures: Resolution
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: (X) Consent Item
(X) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
( ) Regular Time
Per Interim City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item.
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AMENDING THE OUTLINE OF CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT, FRINGE
BENEFITS, AND SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT UNIT TO REMOVE
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILL
THE POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY THROUGH OF AN EMPLOYMENT
CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2008-21, which approved The Outline of
Certain Conditions of Employment, Fringe Benefits, and Salary Adjustments for the Management Unit
(Outline);
WHEREAS, the Outline identifies as members of the unrepresented Management Unit the
positions of Director of Public Safety, Public Safety Commander, and Public Safety Lieutenant;
WHEREAS, incumbents in the positions of Public Safety Commander and Public Safety
Lieutenant formed a represented bargaining group, the Rohnert Park Public Safety Managers Association,
effectively making the Director of Public Safety the only sworn member of the Management Unit;
WHEREAS, it is increasingly the norm throughout California for the heads of police and fire
departments to serve at-will to the City Manager through an employment contract; and
WHEREAS, the incumbent Director of Public Safety has volunteered to enter into an
employment contract with the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rohneli Park
amends the Outline to remove the position of Director of Public Safety.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park authorizes the
City Manager henceforth to fill the position of Director of Public Safety through an at-will employment
contract.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park this 9th
day of March, 2010.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
~
Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to the
City Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items w/attachments via email and the original with twelve (12) complete hard copy
sets to City Clerk DUE no later than NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with Rolmert
Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008,173
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
3/9110 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 7.3
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-21
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
March 9, 2010
Department:
Public Safety
Submitted By:
Terri Mazzanti
Technical Services Manager
Submittal Date:
February 22, 2010
Agenda Title: Amendment to retention schedule for Sonoma County Public Safety Consortium
(SCPSC) Records.
Requested Council Action: It is recommended by the Department of Public Safety that the Council
approve an amendment to the retention schedule for the Sonoma County Public Safety
Consortium (SCPSC) Records. This amendment would extend the retention period of five (5) specific
record types as recommended and adopted by the Sonoma County Public Safety Consortium (SCPSC)
records.
Summary: The City of Rohnert Park has an existing retention schedule for records. On September 25,
2007 the Council adopted Resolution 2007-159 approving a records retention schedule
that was developed by member agencies ofthe Sonoma County Public Safety Consortium (SCPSC).
Rohnert Park is a member agency. The retention schedule developed took into account that some City
documents referenced in the retention schedule are now retained in a shared database maintained by
County under a service agreement. The County had requested that the SCPSC adopt a shared retention
schedule in order to maintain records under one consistent standard. This retention schedule applies to
both paper documents and electronic documents.
The retention schedule adopted in September 2007 exceeded the City of Rohnert Park's time lines on
some items, remained consistent on other items, and added additional records. The revision to the
recommended retention schedule amends 5 types of records. In each case the recommendation is to
extend the period of retention for these records.
The Police Chiefs and the Sheriff were presented with these recommendations and have approved this
revision to the SCPSC retention schedule.
\
Enclosures: Resolution
SCPSC retention schedule with recommended revisions highlighted.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item
( ) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
( ) Regular Time
Per Interim City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item. Date:
(Revised 021809) JH:TG-S :05-b
d
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
APPROVING THE AMENDED RETENTION SCHEDULE FOR
SONOMA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY CONSORTIUM RECORDS
WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park ("City") is one participant of the Sonoma County
Public Safety Consortium (SCPSC), and the County of Sonoma has requested all SCPSC
participants to adopt a shared retention schedule in order to maintain records under one
consistent standard;
WHEREAS, some City documents currently maintained by the Department of Public
Safety are retained in a shared database maintained by the County of Sonoma under a service
agreement with the participants ofthe SCPSC;
WHEREAS, on September 25,2007 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2007-159,
approving a records retention schedule that was developed by member agencies of the SCPSC;
WHEREAS, this amendment to the retention schedule amends five (5) types of records
and exceeds the period of retention for these records; and
WHEREAS, all participating Chiefs of Police and the Sheriff have approved this revised
SCPSC retention schedule.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of Rohnert
Park that it does hereby authorize and approve the amended countywide retention schedule
attached as Exhibit "A."
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this _ day of
,2010.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
3
REPORTS
Misdemeanor crime reports
STATUTE
SYSTEM
CURRENT
Current SCPSC
RECORD TITLE OR DESCRIPTION
COMMENTS
REFERENCE
CUSTODIAN
ROHNERT PARK
10 yrs
ARRESTS
ILEADS
Indefinitely
Indefinitely
Suicides;
Reports involving felony arrests for:
ILEADS
2 yrs
Indefinitely
Traffic fatalities;
Offenses punishable by death;
ILEADS
5 yrs
ILEADS
Indefinitely
Indefinitely
Offenses punishable by life imprisonment;
1 yr
2 ys
ILEADS
Indefinitely
Indefinitely
ILEADS
Embezzlement of public funds
5 yrs
799 P.C.
ILEADS
Indefinitely
Indefinitely
5 yrs
Provided case does not relate to
ILEADS
Indefinitely
Child abuse;
unserved warrants, identifiable
ILEADS
Indefinitely
items have all been recovered,
and there is no pending litigation.
Any report falling under 799 P.C.
(no limit for commencement) or
800 P.C. (crime punishable by 8
Reports involving arrests for all other felonies
years or more in prison).
799 P.C.
ILEADS
Indefinitely
10 yrs
If there is an active warrant
associated with this case, D.A.
needs to be advised. Dismissal of
case from D.A., dismissal of
warrant needs to be complete.
Any unrecovered property needs
to be removed from CLETS, any
Reports involving arrests for misdemeanors
evidence needs to be disposed of.
802 P.C.
ILEADS
2 yrs
5 yrs
Asset seizures
ILEADS
6 mo
10 yrs
11357(e) destroy when offender
11357(b) arrests
turns 18.
11361.5 H &S
ILEADS
2 yrs
REPORTS
Misdemeanor crime reports
ILEADS
2 yrs
5 yrs
Felony crime reports
ILEADS
5 yrs
10 yrs
Homicides;
ILEADS
Indefinitely
Indefinitely
Suicides;
ILEADS
2 yrs
Indefinitely
Traffic fatalities;
ILEADS
5 yrs
10 yrs
Natural causes;
ILEADS
1 yr
2 ys
Attempted suicides /5150;
ILEADS
1 yr
5 yrs
HazMats (complaint/no complaint);
ILEADS
5 yrs
Missing persons (outstanding);
ILEADS
Indefinitely
Child abuse;
ILEADS
Indefinitely
STATUTE
SYSTEM
CURRENT
RECORD TITLE OR DESCRIPTION
COMMENTS
REFERENCE
CUSTODIAN
ROHNERT PARK
Current SCPSC
"Information Report" as only charge
ILEADS
5 yrs
871 W &I escapees
ILEADS
5 yrs
Domestic Violence
ILEADS
10 yrs
Non -Fatal traffic reports --
ILEADS
Includes counter reports, 20002 reports
ILEADS
5 yrs
5 yrs
PDO Accident Reports
ILEADS
5 yrs
City ordinance violations;
799 P.C.
ILEADS
2 yrs
Provided such items are lawfully
Reports of lost and found property
disposed of
34090 G.C.
ILEADS
1 yr
2 yrs
Upon determination by Police
Department or judicial
determination of factual
innocence; records sealed for
period of 3 years from date of
3 yrs from date of
Factually innocent reports
arrest and then destroyed.
851.8 P.C.
ILEADS
expungement
5 yrs from date of
Sealed juvenile records
781(a) W &I
ILEADS
sealing
Abandoned /Stored/Impounded /towed vehicle
i
reports
ILEADS
1 yr
5 yrs
Citations
ILEADS
2 yrs
2 yrs
Registration is required
Indefinitely or until a certificate
of rehab is obtained per Chapter
3.5, Section 4852.01 of Title 6 of
Arson registrants - Adults
Part 3.
457.1 P.C.
ILEADS
Indefinitely
Registration is required for 10
years, until reach age of 25 or
until record is sealed per 871(a)
Arson registrants - Juveniles
WIC.
457.1 P.C.
ILEADS
10 yrs
Section 11590 H &S does not have
Narcotic registrants
a limit to registration requirement.
11590 H &S
ILEADS
Indefinitely
5 yrs
Kept until master record
Records Management System
ILEADS
is purged
Expired permits (CCW)
ILEADS
2 yrs
(from date of expiration)l
I I
ILEADS
1
2 yrs
W
Current SCPSC
Adults Indefinitely /
Juveniles Indefinitely
unless sealed per 871(a)
WIC
10 yrs
90 days
CLETS Log ( CAD 3 yrs
Field Contacts ILEADS 10 yrs
Tracker Records CAD 1 yr
Terminal to Terminal Messaging CAD 1 yr
Officers Activity Log I CAD 3 yrs
RECORD TITLE OR DESCRIPTION
COMMENTS
STATUTE
REFERENCE
SYSTEM
CUSTODIAN
CURRENT
ROHNERT PARK
Sex registrants - All
290 P.C.
ILEADS
Indefinitely
Bicycle Registration
ILEADS
Indefinitely
Rotational tow log
Records of towed vehicles are
retained in CLETS 30 days.
CAD
2 yrs
W
Current SCPSC
Adults Indefinitely /
Juveniles Indefinitely
unless sealed per 871(a)
WIC
10 yrs
90 days
CLETS Log ( CAD 3 yrs
Field Contacts ILEADS 10 yrs
Tracker Records CAD 1 yr
Terminal to Terminal Messaging CAD 1 yr
Officers Activity Log I CAD 3 yrs
City of Rohnert Park
3/9/10 CITYCOUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM NO.8
for
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-22
AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE CITY
COUNCIL TO SUBMIT AN ARGUMENT IN FAVOR
OF THE ROHNERT PARK ESSENTIAL CITY
SERVICES TEMPORARY FUNDING MEASURE,
TO BE SUBMITTED E VOTERS AT THE
CONSOLIDATED PRI ELECTION TO BE
HE ON JUNE 8, 2010
ITEM
r
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
· Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
· Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total oftwenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park Municioal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
3/9/10 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO.8
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-22
[Distributed 3/5/10]
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date: March 9, 2010
Department: City Council
Submitted By: Revenue Enhancement Ad Hoc Committee
Submittal Date: March 5, 2010
Agenda Title: REVENUE BALLOT MEASURE
Requested Council Action: Adopt Resolution No. 2010-22 Approving and Authorizing the City
Council to Submit an Argument in Favor of the Rohnert Park Essential
City Services Temporary Funding Measure, to Be Submitted to the Voters
at the Consolidated Primary Election to Be Held On June 8, 2010
Summary:
On February 23, 2010, the City Council voted unanimously to place the Rohnert Park Essential City
Services Temporary Funding Measure on the June 8,2010 ballot. For measures placed on the ballot by
the legislative body, the legislative body may file a written argument for or against any city measure. The
argument cannot exceed 300 words and must be accompanied by the printed name and signature of its
authors. The Revenue Enhancement Ad Hoc Committee drafted the attached Argument in Favor of the
Rohnert Park Essential City Services Temporary Funding Measure for the City Council's review and
approval.
Enclosures: Revenue Enhancement Ad Hoc Committee Report; Resolution No. 2010-22; draft argument
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item
( ) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
(X) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
(X) Regular Time
Per Interim City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item.
(Revised 031309) JH:TG-S:05-b
To:
From:
Rohnert Park Mayor and Councilmembers
Councilmembers Amie Breeze and Jake Mackenzie
Revenue Enhancement Ad Hoc Committee
Update Regarding March 2 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting
2 March 2010
Re:
Date:
On March 2, 2010 the Revenue Enhancement Ad Hoc Committee met with The Lew Edwards
Group (LEG), and the Interim City Manager. LEG reviewed a timeline that now reflects the
Council's decision to proceed with the Essential City Services Measure in June, and responded
to questions. The committee also reviewed updated informational communications tools,
including Frequently Asked Questions, which the City will use to educate the community about
the facts of our current fiscal condition and the ballot measure. Again, all information
disseminated by the City will be factual, and nonadvocacy in nature.
Community Mailer. As part of the on-going Community Education Effort the third in a series of
five public information mailers will be sent before March 23. This third mailer is an
announcement to the public regarding the City's declaration of fiscal emergency and placement
of the Rohnert Park Essential City Services Temporary Funding Measure on the June ballot.
Many cities issue these types of factual announcements following a measure's placement, so the
community can be informed. Mailer #3 will detail the significant cuts that the City Council has
had to make, including those made prior to declaration of the fiscal emergency. This mailer and
future mailings will be reviewed by the Ad Hoc Committee, receive legal approval from the City
Attorney, and e-mailed to all Councilmembers prior to its mailing.
Ballot Argument. The Committee discussed at length LEG's suggestion of having all five City
Councilmembers sign the argument in favor of the ballot measure, as LEG feels it is significant
to present the Council's deliberation and unanimity to its constituents. "All-council" submittal of
the argument is legally permissible. Should a rebuttal be submitted, community members could
be featured on the rebuttal. After careful consideration and discussion, the Committee requested
that LEG draft the ballot argument for consideration by the Council. The draft which will be
considered this evening has been carefully drafted to provide pertinent information that our
recent community survey found to be of greatest interest to the public, as well as effectively
stating the City's position, in the limited 300 words available. In keeping with the Council's
unanimous vote to declare a fiscal emergency and present this measure to the public, it is our
desire that all five City Councilmembers consider signing this argument in favor, as drafted. The
Committee has already reviewed the draft and provided input, as has the City Attorney. If all
five Councilmembers do not wish to sign the argument, then it will be redrafted for signature by
community leaders.
The Committee has scheduled a third meeting for March 16 at 3 PM.
0-
Vote YES on AAA: Rohnert Park's Essential City Services Temporary Funding Measure to
prevent further drastic cuts to your essential services. YES on AAA protects Rohnert Park
against unfair Sacramento money grabs!
State budget cuts and "takeaways" have dramatically reduced the money available for our
services-over $5.5 million taken by Sacramento, putting essential police, fire, street paving,
pothole repair, and park maintenance at risk. .
Rohnert Park faces a severe fiscal emergency~we've had no choice but to slash the
community's services and layoff several employees, including police officers and firefighters-
in the coming months additional cuts will have to be made.
Without Yes on AAA, drastic cuts to public safety services will most likely have to be made.
YES on AAA allows the city some time to continue to preserve the safety of Rohnert Park by
helping to:
. Protect remaining 9-1-1 emergency/medical response services;
. Maintain remaining gang/sex offender enforcement programs; and
. Protect most remaining police and fire services.
YES on AAA's strict fiscal accountability provisions and requirements are:
. Annual audits and published expenditure reports, ensuring funds are used appropriately.
. Rohnert Park visitors share the Yz cent cost Measure AAA is NOT a property tax.
. Measure AAA is not applied to food purchased as groceries or prescription medicine.
. Measure AAA expires in five years.
. EVERY PENNY stays in Rohnert Park, and can't be taken by Sacramento!
We've had different perspectives and disagreements about various issues.
But we are united on the severity of the City's [mancial situation and the need to act. That's why
we voted UNANIMOUSLY to place Measure AAA on your ballot. Join all of the Council and
the community in voting YES on AAA to protect our services and keep our money local!
Visit www.rpcity.org -- learn more about our fiscal emergency.
EXHIBIT A
q
e()fy ~cA -ti~.~~of~
3/9/10 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO.8
[Distributed 3/9/10)
CITY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
March 9, 2010
TO:
Honorable Mayor Stafford and Councilmembers
FROM:
Dan Schwarz, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Agenda Item NO.8: Revenue Ballot Measure
I was contacteq earlier today by the staff from the Lew Edwards Group (LEG),
the City's advisors for the revenue enhancement process. Upon further
consideration, LEG staff proposes making minor changes to the Argument in
Favor of the revenue ballot measure. The changes are attached in legislative
notation. A new "Exhibit A" for the resolution is also attached.
Vote YES on AAA: Rohnert Park's Essential City Services Temporary Funding Measure to
prevent further drastic cuts to your essential services. YES on AAA protects Rohnert Park
against unfair Sacramento money grabs!
State budget cuts and "takeaways" have dramatically reduced the money available for our
services--over $5.5 million taken by Sacramento, putting essential police, fire, street paving,
pothole repair, and park maintenance at risk.
Rohnert Park faces a severe fiscal emergency-we've had no choice but to slash the
community's services and layoff several significant numbers of employees, including police
officers and firefighters-in the coming months additional cuts will have to be made.
Without Yes on AAA, drastic cuts to public safety services will most likely have to be made.
YES on AAA allows the city some time to continue to preserve the safety of Rohnert Park by
helping to:
. Protect remaining 9-1-1 emergency/medical response services;
. Maintain remaining gang/sex offender enforcement programs; and
. Protect most remaining police and fire services.
YES on AAA's strict fiscal accountability provisions and requirements are:
. Annual audits and published expenditure reports, ensuring funds are used appropriately.
. ROhnert Park visitors share the Y2 cent cost. Measure AAA is NOT a property tax.
. Measure AAA is not applied to food purchased as groceries or prescription medicine.
. Measure AAA expires in five years.
. EVERY PENNY stays in Rohnert Park, and can't be taken by Sacramento!
We've all had different perspectives and disagreoments about various issues. But we are united
on the severity of the City's financial situation and the need to act. That's why we voted
UNANIMOUSL Y to place Measure AAA on your ballot. Join all of the Council and the
community in voting YES on AAA to protect our services and keep our money local! .
Visit www.fPcitv.org --learn more about our fiscal emergency.
8-
Vote YES on AAA: Rohnert Park's Essential City Services Temporary Funding Measure to
prevent further drastic cuts to your essential services. YES on AAA protects Rohnert Park
against unfair Sacramento money grabs!
State budget cuts and "takeaways" have dramatically reduced the money available for our
services-over $5.5 million taken by Sacramento, putting essential police, fire, street paving,
pothole repair, and park maintenance at risk.
Rohnert Park faces a severe fiscal emergency-we've had no choice but to slash the
community's services and layoff significant numbers of employees, including police officers
and firefighters-in the coming months additional cuts will have to be made.
Without Yes on AAA, drastic cuts to public safety services will most likely have to be made.
YES on AAA allows the city some time to continue to preserve the safety of Rohnert Park by
helping to:
. Protect remaining 9-1-1 emergency/medical response services;
. Maintain remaining gang/sex offender enforcement programs; and
. Protect most remaining police and fire services.
YES on AAA's strict fiscal accountability provisions and requirements are:
. Annual audits and published expenditure reports, ensuring funds are used appropriately.
. Rohnert Park visitors share the Yz cent cost. Measure AAA isNOT a property tax.
. Measure AAA is not applied to food purchased as groceries or prescription medicine.
. Measure AAA expires in five years.
. EVERY PENNY stays in Rohnert Park, and can't be taken by Sacramento!
We've all had different perspectives about various issues. But we are ,united on the severity of
the City's financial situation and the need to act. That's why we voted UNANIMOUSLY to
place Measure AAA on your ballot. Join all of the Council and the community in voting YES on
AAA to protect our services and keep our money local!
Visit www.rpcitv.org -- learn more about our fiscal emergency.
EXHIBIT A
3
I' Agenda Packet Preparation TlMELlNES for Regular City Council Meetings {This section for City Clerk Use Only}
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no 3/9/10 City Council Agenda
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization", ITEM NO.9
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park Municioal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
March 9, 2010
Department:
Administration
Submitted By:
Dan Schwarz, Interim City Manager
Submittal Date:
March 4, 2010
Agenda Title:
City Budget - Next Steps
Requested Council Action: Provide direction and take appropriate actions regarding Council's
goal of eliminating $1.2 Million from General Fund budget.
Summary:
At the Council's February 23, 2010 meeting, expenditure reductions totaling $985,000 were identified
and approved. The list of approved cuts is attached to this report. Staff is in the process of refining the
list to determine the effective date of each cut. Staff is also studying General Government Expenditures
to meet the Council's goal that $200,000 be eliminated from that portion of the budget. It may be
necessary to consider other elements of the budget to meet this target. We will provide some discussion
of our findings at the Council's March 9, 2010 meeting and anticipate presenting a detailed report at the
Council's March 23 meeting.
At the Council's February 9, 2010 meeting, the Council established a minimum goal of reducing the
General Fund budget by $1.2 million. The Council expressed a desire to find as much as $2 million in
cuts. Staff is seeking direction and, if appropriate, action from the Council on how to proceed. The
Council has revisited the budgets of most of the City operations - the most significant department not yet
considered is Public Safety. Public Safety staff is reviewing operations to determine what additional cuts
the department can sustain; the department budget may be lowered by attrition, as there are indications
that at least one officer may soon obtain employment with another agency.
Staffs recommendation is that the Council affirm its goal of adopting cuts of $1.2 to $2 million. Staff
further recommends that the Council set a minimum target for reducing the Public Safety budget. If the
Council affirms its goal of $1.2 to $2 million, the contribution from Public Safety will likely need to be
$215,000 to $1,015,000. With this direction, staff will prepare an analysis for the March 23 Council
meeting.
City Budget
Page 2
Note: For this budget discussion, staff is incorporating all previously circulated budget material. In order
to save paper, we are not circulating the material with the agenda. The material can be found at
www.rpcity.org under "City's Financial Condition."
Enclosures: table of expenditure reductions
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item
( ) Approval , ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
(X) Regular Time
Per Interim City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item.
WORKFORCE REDUCTION
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
DECOMMISSION A & L POOLS
LOWERED COST OF CAD/RMS
RENT ANNEX
NON DEPARTMENTAL REDUCTION
TEMP CLOSURE OF M POOL
TURN OFF COURT LIGHTING
DECOMMISSION SPAS
ELIMINATE MORNING LAP SWIM
IN-HOUSE STREET LIGHT MAINT.
COMPUTER TASK FORCE OFFICER
CLOSE PARK BATHROOMS
280,000
100,000
15,000
50,000
30,000
200,000
65,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
70,000
80,000
50,000
TOTAL
985,000
~
~r "I
,~ '.f
DOROTHY ROHNERT SPRECKELS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
ENDOWMENT FOR THE FUTURE
3/9nOCity Council Agenda
ITEM NO.9
[Distributed 3/9/10]
~
In December.1989, the City of Rohnert Park established the Dorothy Rohnert Spreckels
Performing Arts Center EndQwmentFund. Its purpose is to Qenerate enou.gh funds
from its earned interest to substantially help offset the operation expenses Incurred at
the Center, and, most importantly, to keep those expenses from being reflected in
community rental rates and ticket prices. The basic mission of the Spreckel~.C?enteris
to assure the community affordable access to the Center's prograrrfiand faclhtles. A
healthy endowment fund is the only way this mission will be accomprlShed.
One month after establishing the Endowment Fund, the San Francisco office of
Community Counseling Services (CCS), a highly respected fund-raising consultancy,
was hired by the City to explore whether or not an ambitious endowment campaign
would succeed. After an intensive five weeks of research, surveys, interviews, and
assessments, the CCS team's report revealed the following conclusions.
IMAGE AND PERCEPTIONS
Without exception, the City of Rohnert Park's Performing Arts Center is viewed as a
benefit to the City of Rohnert Park and the surrounding area. People are proud and
excited that such a state~of-the-art Center has been builtin their city. These positive
feelings will obviously benefit any campaign for funds to insure the continuation of the
Center. This is further evidenced by the indication that nearly nine of every ten
respondents to the survey will use the facility .
CCS rates the perceptions of the proposed project a "10" on a scale often.
~
CASE
The greatest strength of the case is that the proposed new Center would benefit and be
used by many groups in the community: schools, church affiliated organiZQtions, clubs,
local artsgroups,and civic organizations, not to mentionbringingfine, professional
performances and events to the City. Secondly, and even more signfficantIy, the entire
Center has already been paid for and the endowment fund would preclude any
additional taxes over ~above operational costs.
CCS. rates the Case for the endowment an "B" on a scale of ten.
LEADERSHIP
The most positive aspect of the evaluation is the leadership and potential leadership for
a campaign. It is unusually high to find over one-half of all community leaders who are
personc:i1ly interviewed as well as nearly one-quarter of respondents to an anonymous
direCt mail survey indicate they would be willing to assist on a committee to raise funds.
Nearly 50 people, including city officials, would be willing to help raise funds.
CCS rates the Leadership a "9" on a scale of ten.
PROSPECTIVE DONORS
CCS' evaluation discloses that a list of about 250 "prospective" donors can be
developed to include individuals, merchants, clubs, associations., foundations and
corporations. CCS' recommended plan would try to raise a minimum of $1.5 Million from
the least amount of donors. This plan would not exclude a general "community phase,n
however, few campaigns can succeed by relying on support from nominal gifts ina
community phase. In addition, a number of key major gift prospects' opinions and
thoughts on the project are still pending.
CCS rates the prospective donor potential a "6" to "B" on a scale of ten.
~
RESOURCES
The City of Rohnert Park does have, and could provide, the management resources
necessary to mount and sustain a campaign. Such resources would include a budget
for office space, equipment, supplies, staff, materials and managementservices.
9
~
t""\
."....,......,
cc.~i;.-f.~.~ .
-\:}:7f
With these independent findings, the City launched its Enpowment Campaignin June
1990 with a goal of $3,000,000 in gifts and pledges over three years. Led by a
commit;!eemade up of local business and community leaders, all of whom made
generous donations to the Endowment, the campaign is now approachingthe end of its
second year of activities. Thus far, gifts have ranged from $100 to over a half million
dollars, These gifts have come from civic groups, small companies, large corporations,
and individuals. Pledged gifts to the Endowment, stretched over three to five years,will
eventually bring the Fund up to the targeted goals planned by the campaign committee,
The Endowment Fund is our community's best hope to insure the continued operations
and services of the Spreckels Center. It is the essential element in the Center's plan for
long-term financial stability. If the Center is to maintain its policy of affordable rental
rates and ticket prices; its continuation of subsidized arts education programs; its
commitment to the viability of high quality arts programming; and its goal to significantly
reduce, if not eliminate, the need for City tax dollars, then the key to success is the
Endowment Fund -- for the Endowment Fund is our anchor to the future.
The following reports tell the progress and status of the Endowment Campaign.
~
10
(''\
,(\,
INTER OFFICE MEMO
FROM:
r"1N ...il\k~
1o-J~~\%~J~tter .
City Manager
DATE:
March 18,1994
The City Council, at its meeting of March 8, 1994, agreed to re'-
allocate the $20,000 received from Dorothy Rohnert Spreckels frorn
the Endowment Fund (of which the Council designated) to the
Performing Arts Center's general fundraising account.
The Council has agreed tore..:.allocate this to the
fundraising account for the purpose of assisting in
'improvernents at the Performing Arts Center as well
adve.rtis ing and marketing budget.
general
sign
as the
Please make the appropriate'transfer.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please
gi ve "me a call.
JDN:lr
cc: Michael Grice, Director of Performing Arts Center
1
\...d'
.~.
~
Press
~DEMOCRAT-
CouncI~"
CoprlO"~
Copy to
CopylO
Copy to
I
~
May 5, 1994
P.o. BOX 569.427 MENDOCINO AVENUE
SANTA ROSA. CALIFORNIA 95402
! 707) 546-2020
Mr. Joe Netter
City Manager, Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Robnert Park, CA 94928
RECEIVED
0lIttLW1
@. IO~
MAY' 1994
Dear Mr. Netter:
ClTYOF
ROHNERT PARK
Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Section 6250 et seq. of the Government Code), I
hereby request copies or access to the following documents:
.~
If you determine that a portion of the infonnation I have requested is exempt by express provisions
of the law, Gov. Code Section 6256 requires a detennination and notification to me of the reasons
no later than 10 days from your receipt of this request. Gov. Code 6256.2 prohibits the use of the
10-day period, or any provision of the Public Records Act lito delay access for purpose of
inspecting public records."
Government Code 6257 additionally requires segreg~on of any matertial made under this request
that is not exempt in order that any portion of this request can be satisfied.
Please note that the Act is enforceable by court proceedings which, if they result in an order to
disclose infonnation that has been improperly withheld, involved the mandatory award of court
costs and reasonable attorney's fees to plaintiff.
Because the information requested would be used in a news story which would primarily benefit the
general public, I also request that you waive any fees or costs associated with disclosure.
Thank you for your assistance,
~~~
Staff Writer
526-8585
'~
~TI
A New YOIX TImes Company
r~' ...:".'~;I:"I~'''''~'C''\'~~K' "i<;iJ'e"::>>'''I', "'sn#~~~~~
,,' .'. pr.e.. .;, '-, 'i,':,:;} ;
, . : ' . , . '. .~ -.:", .'
".!ti~~~ii~';~]
;,;uona ' ons.4?:
~;~ithi:'jjBE' . .' ~.:~~,;'<'
:':'lly CAROL BENI'El.,.':.
--:t";~~Jr~-~~~!~~~\othr.~R~~;~e rt~~!
. Spieckels Performing Arts Center;'{:~
Wasbulltln'I990,fRohnert Park ,,~A::
.ottlclals' predicted It 'would: be, /
Self-supportlng In five years. But '.:
!with less than 11 year to go, the
'center Is stranded In a financial'.,
morass. . .
;'. Tbe city, taclng Its own budget
crunch, takes' donations and In-
c' 1 from the center's endowment
1 . costing the facility thousands'
of dollars each year. . .
'. '.'It they were anything but a city.
it would bemlsappropriaUon of
funds and diversion ot.assets," said
Belinda Johns, ':who prose.cutes ..".';
cbarlty fraud'cases In' the state~"
. ~ttorney genenil's oftlce. ..,. ~ ":e.".o;;"',"
< The endoiVme'nt fund. with a goal' .
tit $2 million by 1992, languishes lit
. $~35,OOO In 1994. . .
,.: Donations tothe fund were to be
Invested and tbe Income, used to
rrtake . the center seH-supportlng.
But tund-raislng eHorts drift while
the city awaits a multimillion.dol-
'. lar bequest trom Dorothy Rohnert
t, SeeRP, PageA6
, ~;
.;,!,~EP'.R,E!;III!.~~~~~T. ~O~D~Y! ~~RILll. .~9~~.
~ United Way got .In trouble sever: edtolhetund:falsing drtve; but be
I years ago for doIng exacUy wbat since has'movedto Los Angeles.
e cIty tsdolng - reducJng lis' Former City Manager Pete Calli-
:appropriations to member organl- nanplcked Rogers and COlldlotti
I :zations by the amount of. donations. because. "you try to get tnnue'rttial
Continued from Page 41 raised, Felton said. '. people;wbo know peoplewbo'have
Ispreckels, for whom th'e center Is. "It this was a non.profft organlza. money," . Said City Manager Joe
I named.' . tlon, they would be' called on the . Netler. .
I Also, a non.protlt organization t f tt," F It Id . Yet, two years past its seH-set
: formed to' raise.' money -:for ..the. carpe orc' ~ ~.._.~,_,~n sa ,: . deildUne, 'the fund drive' stands at
': center may owe back taxes and The~lty has: a responslbiUty . .$635,000, according to Netter. Most
I penalties to state and federal gov. wheillt accepts donations to make. . of that ::-' $400.000 -: was gJvenby
: emments because the city failed to sure they . are -used 'as'the donor developerHiigh Codding. CondiotU
: apply for tax-exempt status. Intended, he said. contrtbuted $100,000, AmerIcan
, The $7 mllUon Performing Arts , . Golt,the company that contracts to
' Center houses an acting company. I' People who donate to the center operate the city~s golf course, gave
.il symphony and a ballet. It Is the probably expect the money will go $50,000 and Rogers gave $40,000.
;only facility north of Sari FrancIsco to enhance 'thecenter, "but the
:bullt expressly'for the performing .chance of that llappening Is slIm to Sprecke)s bequest expected
: arts 'and It sponsored 254 events none It It goes throUgh the city in the next few years, the city
,last year. said Director MIChael .general'rund," Felton said. . expects $500.000 more, from Cod-
:Grtce. . Two other arts organizations In dIng. City ortlclals also bave been
: But four years after ,Its gala Sonoma County also are :partially told that Dorothy Rohnert Spreck.
.openlng, the center's ','starr: has subsidIzed, by pUblIc agencies . - els, for whose family Rohnert Park
;dropped from Alve',Ao ..'thre~ .the Summer Repertory.Tbeater at .was named, Is considering leavIng
';full-time. employees. 'Its budget Santa Rosa JunIor College and the $6 million to $8 million to the
-stands at $473,000. while the Bur- . Burbank Center for the Arts In' center wben she dies. .
:bank Center for the Arts,' only Santa Rosa. -Rogers. who has been Spreckels'
:one-thlrd larger In square footage, . In both cases, donations are used real estate broker for 30 years, Is'
,has a $3 million budget. to supplement budgets. Neither the credited wIth Influencing her to'
. Some $9.000 In donations to the college nor the county reduces leave the bequest but referred all
;center last year might have been appropriations according to the questions about. the bequest to
:used to supplement the, austere amount donated, said the directors Spreckels' attorney, Bruce Rlch-
:budget. Instead, the money went tor the orga'nlzaUons. ardson.
;Into the city's general fund to orrsct . When the Performing Arts Cen- Richardson, a partner with Rog-'
.the average $200,000 a year the city ter . opened Jour. years ago, city ers In the Red Lion' Inn, could not
:Spend~ to operate the center. ,;'ortlclats hoped ;'Inl:ome" from a be reached for comment. 'Red nags'
: By using' donations this way, the . properly Invested endowment fUnd City leaders had several explil1ia! . NeUer and Grice said they were
city trees money It would otherwJsewould.help make 'the facility Uons for .t~f. ~patheUcJ~.~d,r~!s!n~unawarethecorporaUon never had
have spent on the center. .- ~~"" Jself:supportlng,;-,'/i:.._ .':'.',;..... to date.' .' "':':"',..-',:,,'~A, ,been-. j;lven taX-exempt status and
: Mayor Jim Reilly said he was not . ';""":!(Iti"""i{':j""-~ij,,'iij:'!":i'.i';;'d'- . '''RohnertPark'ls'''ri':new':cltY;~ would tile an appllcatlon Immedl.
. ,troubled by.:, pilttl ng ,'the center's ic)Jnvestmen( income rerouted , , Rogers saId. "We don't h'eve'tbe old alely."--..; "', . .' ,,' "
''1oney In-'the'~!!Y.'S:8enrralfllnd:'1:':' Hp,?,ever ; the-city' also' tSkesthe-f money tha\ towns Ilke~ sa~ta, -R.?~:?:Nevefth'eleS:-'!~ uie non-protH cor-
Aay~e peoP!,eare hl'lppywHh Jhe. me~from :endowment fund In-T.and othe~, communitIes have!:"""-';'poration maybe lIable'for back
,~dea ,;~~;r.e:~~,:!s~~l,n!:,.';;C?~~::; ill e.. rilentil':;f:'!$32,OOOJaSt 'year. ~.J:} 'Netter;:8B.I~.:;bu~get,cut~.baY!l,<;, t1ix~(..l!n~,:peri!,IUes,.saJd.1..:!!ID
';".'\~~~lllt.'iaid ;.i:~~k~G~~~1;~;h~tiJ'. " ~ua~~ti~~7e~~b~;~~r~:~,n:~li~~'>';_~&~~~~:I~~ii~~~~ \~~~f~~<:nb~~ ;"'i:b~el)~~~~,tate ~egJstrar..of marl-
,lIlways ask where thelrmoneY':~,hllB d.':Donors'glve: money to the'~as U~,!l.te~oll~Il ~~natlollS',_; ,) '.'Some, red nags are' going up
',going beforelheymllke a donall,o,n..,,~'~;tendowlTlenttund so themoneywlU;;+Grlce,sald' he} bellevedfund'.:here,'.!c:ampbell llBld. ~If they have
. i CouncflmanDave 'Eck,'WhosllB nllnue.'o fun~ a'certaln organlza"""ralslng"was. on , a'" back burner . ~.revenue. .they ; ()\Ve,tax:onthe
:.pn !lle arts.,ce!1ter,. commlttee"'B,a!~ n::i!:Si<:,i:'.:,,:>:i:;':':\~;;:',. '-;;'because;.of,pledges, fro.m ~qdlng ....,~e_venue:.,~e;;"';;:I;.;,;?ifi*"@ti,i1,;,i*~
'.':' those .who give money to ,the,cente.r,f\er"th.egala9penlng In1990,:,.:and 'Spre<:keJs;,~!;We)elt Il~~..wlth .-JAlert.ed tglhe pr~bJe,mi Eck saId,
:.'M,?W .~~YNH!.yjngl!t~Jh!<'!:Jt;R!)lle'my'/'.e~M!jgur,~}n" !h'e _be,quest .find tlle,cas.h, 'we,,,~d ",:"It's toobad/)l/e'r~.~olnIlJo lose
. :;t:~>Xo~ ,I:~.n~l glylng. consPIpe .!len. al estille..~.r.R.ket' !'Jladeour goalthe 8llId:X~/:;;,:\;:'\-..;._mo e Jh~.!..Could.haY,e,~eIler .be.~n
tot,"cr~d.lt!;T~e, Pe[1orml mfe2 per':Art eIlon:saldlt wasessentlal,tbe' center,",:~Wl'~';J.t.,!
e,r)S1~.~,9ItY'~i,~e811ld " Jtfi-.' xpl~lii:Jo~$ff.t~cJieis.tiilit.... ." ."""""A~:;Qi:\~~
w.~Yer'-'.the ,:pra,ctl 'w1trom1ber'bequ x-exempt
S!~~~lathard Pel 1~9 'CltY'g~iiei~n)l.1l f"" "e
'""""" It I dOJ.loteoinU
properly invested endowment f~nd wQuld help make the Dorothy Rohnert
elf-supporting.
It, I can get lt back. But It I'm deal
there's not a darn thing I can do,'
Felton said.
Non-profit corporation
.: As anotber way of raising mone: .
for the. center, the cJty. In' .199:
created a non-proUt corporation t,
'apply for' grants and spOnsor fund
raiserS. "
.' The directors of the cOrPoratlor
. ..Th<;_ Friends or DorQtby Rohner
Spreckels Performing Arts Cente,
'Were the same men appointed I,
lead the endowment tund drive _
Rogers, CondloUI and Jones.
The theater guiid recently hB!
begun using tbe non.profit corpora
tlon and In tbe past year has raiser
about $18,000, Grtce said. The
ballet and symphony raIse mone)
through other non.prom corpora.
tlons.
LaSt fall, saId Grtce, Rogers.
CondloUI and Jones were replace,
by the dIrectors of the theateJ
guild: Ron MlJatello, KevIn Wohleri
land Mary McDougall.
; But no, one ever applied for
'exemptlon trom . taxes for tbe non.
profit corporation, and It Is listed a~
a for-profit organization wIth both
the IRS and the state Franchise
Tax Board, according to spokes.
men for those a.gencles. . .
/.~;:/
.<::
:' . ':-~':'~';
''''.,-
.:j:
,..
.t,.
','
~I
I'IH" ~,:). ::1'+ J. (. \010 "VMI'1I:." I. r'Ht':K l.l 11 MHLL HI'lI'lt.,x,
1-".1/1
ENOOWlST.XLS
.~;
SPRECKL;E;$;:PE~F::Q,I~fIlJ.NG. ~TS;CENTER
eN~()w.NIJZNr'l;UNOir;()f\.ITRIBUtORS LIST
". <i'" < ;<,~.>>
<c.' ;.' .d'
........
"-../
, ,
_.
DONOR
DATEJ
.(;1
.;,
AMeRICAN~otF CORP.
l'
SAS1C$.JNS;rlNCTS, INC.
.
. . ..
COl1ptNcs;eNTERPRISES
" '.
:.,
; 0-412i1.1lt:,:-:'-:-~:::' ~~-"_ ~'n
':"<;~' '....
01/31194 .'.
.:OO130J~~J' . ....,
:c ........Q1J1',19:3/.i
.:. ;:(fj~q1)f1'2. :'.
0612'1/91.
...
..
"'-~:
.'.
~;
GONiD)'OTtf REV.TROST:;
.
'.!. ."'.',--" -,".-' ., _ . -- .;'-j};/,,-'
t>:,aQttl~a:~l-$l?a~Sgi1!e$ ,
\, .,J'.; f .'
!;'&AlOaVIS~O~M~NTCQ:\' .;
:..:. ,,o":""
'.','. M~a~I~.C9MJ:>ANY
., ~~j,~~REt
~"':~~:. .1<
~~yf!:FAf{M;IN~:iCO.
<.,:., .... ,.'.
\ < ......"..',
. .'.:,....
04/30/90
., '.'
12131.793
.. ,'.
'04120/92....
i
'. :,()9k1'9/90,
'.'
.' '.
,10/17101 :
,
02102103
1~/31~2 "
. 06/17/91 ".
06/30/90 .
.'
Q6130l91
....
....
".
~TERI~A~M~RP~... .
I " '\, \. '.
SLAN.(j!i:iE:.zO...W8fiJ:Y.....
:..... ;
!ANO~e(M~apNATION
AtiJONYM~PPNATlqN
.
06/27190
06/27/90
I
,.06706191:
"
.
c'.;,.
TOTAL..CASH:Ot)NATI.lDNS
'.
.
SALESOF$EATS ....
".
TOTAL CONlRIB,UTEDENDOWM=NTS@ 2128194
'---" '. - ..
. ..
.
"
i1
-0'
.~
,~m
1FT
co:," I
:.!',;;;i$25'iOOO.OO
'/'< 25i:OOO;OO"
DONOR
TOTAL
$50,000.00
$1,500.00
'.
-
1,50aiOO
..100.QOQ,QO
,..3QiOPP.OO
70'iQOO.OO
.100,000;00
'. '100,OOO.QO
$400,000.00
,tOO;OOO:QO, 1'.}$1QO,OOOJXl
.. <.j
2();~OP';O()> I'" .$20,000;00"
.'. .. ,;: ':..,/'. .,'.-?;/ '-- C\ ') J ;.
'.: ':125'0';00'7$1.,250:00 I:7Yt.: I~.J
.... ,?, :,q;.,;.{,.,; ~c<,.;'
.... .. .:.5.000:0a:: . ....\$5;OO(),OQ;
,,' .', ". ." T
';4o:POO'~OOi$40;OOO.OO
- t: rN/~
~.
,-
.
1;SPO:9Q
'.' tisgOiOO.
;3 i$.Q.O. 00
3;$OO.QO/ ....... $10.000.00
,
.
.....
, . ....'4iOO()~OO:
" '.
$1.000.00
. ,
. ...$5ootOO
,
500100.'
.
."
'.
.
. '" 1,Q.Pl,(lO
. .... 500.~OO
$600.00
;
$629i6S0;PO
....
'$5' D'''.'O'OO
. -,~,..
.'
..$&~.4S();OO
'.
Page 1
..~..
F~~
...h.
,---:
8..
".'''' ...
...~
... ..:,"'- --:<"-~.-:'-'--":-.' -' ,'-':,:"'-"'-_"\c
...........-....- "'"", ...
. .....-_.. .'." .
....'..., :_"c_'__:;_'_ "_ _,
. ,_,_' - '." ,n ....
:":'-:;.-..., ",">:-'" .:'-',:. ".'-"- ::-.::.:.,' <- '",,- -~,'-
. "-,..-,.::......,.. .,'" :~._-.-<.'._..;:.,-,--. ,-,---..-.,',-'
.- ,.-.-"'..:- -..-..----.,;-...-....:......
'::.-_.. .--_c--:'_'-;, - ;.-"
. .. ......... ..--.... . .--..
.. ", -' ., .
. ...[)~;f;l~trHYROHNERT SPRECKELS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
ENE10WMENT CAMPAIGN
Gifts or pledges of $100,000 or more
Codding. Enterprizes
Art and Bette Condiotti
Marie Rohnert
Dorothy Rohnert Spreckels
Gifts or pledges of $25,000 to $100,000
Jimmy and Joyce Rogers
American Golf Corporation
Gifts or pledges of $5,000 to $25,000
State Farm Insurance
McBail Homes
r".
Gifts or pledges of $500 to $5,000
Michael Douglas
Sara Warmerdam
Blanche Whitney
Kitchen Kut-Ups
Gifts or pledges $100 to $500
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Abbey
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Anderson
Ms. Vivian Beban
Dr. and Mrs. Max Dubin
Ms. Millie Hamill
Mr. and Mrs. Walt Heagy
Mrs. Edward Isett
Ms. Vesta B. Jelte
Mr. and Mrs. Abraham Newman
Ms. Gladys Ortega
Physical Therapy Services of Rohnert Park
Dr. and Mrs. Charles W. Roth
Ms. Shirley Schiffrin
Mr. and Mrs. Walter R. Schubert
Mr. and Mrs. Nathaniel Snyder
Mr. and Mrs. Michael Steele
CASH BALANCE OF ENDOWMENT FUND (NOT INCLUDING PLEDGES): $407,000
TOTAL PLEDGES (TO BE RECEIVED BY 1995): $600,000
~.
11
General Government Expenditures
Savings in Current Year Budget That Can Also Be Applied to FYlO-11
Office Supplies
Postage
Admin Contractual Services
HR Professional Services
Recruitment
City Hall Annex
One Time Savings in Current Year Budget
Salaries and Benefits
CM Travel
Savings
$10,000
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$31,000
$10,000
$81,000
$35,000
$2,500
$37,500
Budget
$28,000
$25,000
$37,000
$20,000
$62,000
$25,580
, \ -c..9L- ~PF/J.
() ~'
exf Qar'?- Qi: k.y U
~o~-N 01: <KQ~).CA.Y
cc:
File:
File:
General Government Expenditures
Savings in Current Year Budget That Can Also Be Applied to FY10-11
Office Supplies
Postage
Admin Contractual Services
HR Professional Services
Recruitment
City Hall Annex
One Time Savings in Current Year Budget
Salaries and Benefits
CM Travel
Savings
$10,000
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$31,000
$10,000
$81,000
$35,000
$2,500
$37,500
Budget
$28,000
$25,000
$37,000
$20,000
$62,000
$25,580
'1'
Hauff. Judy
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Schwarz,
Tuesday, h 09, 20104:48 PM
Griffin, Tern; 'Hauff, Judy
Lipitz, Sandy
excel sheet
general government exp.xls
Please have this on the laptop so that we can show it on the screen during the budget talk.
Dan
Dan Schwarz~ Interim city Manager
city of Rohnert Park
dschwarz@rpcity.org
(707) 5 212
(707) 5 -2263 fax
www.rpcity.org
1
I
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
A ~eements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
ITEM #10
3/9/10 CDC AGENDA
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
March 9, 2010
Department:
Administration
Submitted By:
(Name & Title)
Submittal Date:
Linda Babonis, Housing & Redevelopment Manager
March 5, 2010
Agenda (Subject Only) Title:
Review of CDC Projects and Programs
Requested Council Action: Provide Requested Direction Enumerated in Staff Recommendation
Summary:
Pursuant to California Redevelopment Law, Redevelopment agencies are required to adopt
implementation plans every five years. Staffhas been working with Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc.
("RSG") to develop the City ofRohnert Park Community Development Commission Five Year
Implementation Plan for FY 2009/10 through 2013/14 (the "Plan"). The proposed Plan is nearly
complete and set for adoption at a noticed public hearing, but staff is wrestling with the $4.1 million take
of Rohnert Park redevelopment funds by the state. Establishing priority projects and programs is critical,
particularly in light of the fact that not all projects and programs contemplated in the Plan will be funded
within the five year period.
Discussion:
Implementation Plans
Implementation plans must contain the specific goals and objectives of the agency for the project area and
specific programs and estimated expenditures proposed to be made during the next five years as well as
an explanation of how these will eliminate blight within the project area and implement the low- and
moderate-income housing requirements. An implementation plan should be viewed as a policy and
program document. Adoption of an implementation plan does not constitute an approval of any specific
program, project or expenditure described in the plan. Agencies may not pursue projects and programs
without an implementation plan.
1
Funding Options for CDC Projects & Programs
The two primary sources of funding for CDC projects and programs are tax increment and bond proceeds.
Tax Increment & 20% Set-Aside
As of July 1,2009, the CDC had a beginning cash balance of$6,391,703. These funds represent
unexpended tax increment from prior fiscal years. Ifthe state prevails in its take of redevelopment funds,
the CDC will lose $5 million in cash reserves over the course of the next two fiscal years.
On 1/26/2010, the CDC amended its FY 2009/1 0 budget. The amended budget reflects the latest revenue
projections as well as expenditures, including the FY 2009/10 State take of Redevelopment Funds in the
amount of $4.1 million. The budget contemplates an operating reserve of$1,171,500. Staff estimates
that the Redevelopment Fund (Fund 910) cash balance on June 30, 2010 will be within ten percent of the
budgeted amount. Projected cash on hand at year end, including the reserve, is $2,271,586. The
estimated Low & Moderate Housing Fund (Fund 911) cash balance at June 30, 2010 is $197,940. This
fund does not have an operating reserve. Funding shortfalls are funded from the Redevelopment Fund.
Series 2007 Tax Allocation Bonds
In cooperation with RSG, tax increment projections have been developed to establish the CDC's capacity
to generate sufficient cash flow to cover its debt throughout the term of its indebtedness which is FY
2037/38. The projection indicates that ifno action is taken to reduce or restructure the CDC's debt on
the Redevelopment side (Fund 910), the CDC may begin to experience negative fund balances as early as
FY 2011/12. In order to ensure sufficient cash flow to service its debt, the CDC needs to retire
("Defease") a portion of its debt, specifically the Series 2007R Tax Allocation Bonds ("TABS"). Retiring
a portion of the Series 2007R bonds will enable the CDC to service its debt and generate positive cash
flow to pursue future projects and programs. Since only a portion of the bonds would necessarily be
defeased, the remainder would be available for projects and/or programs.
As of January 20 I 0, projected cash balances for the Series 2007 TABS are as follows;
2007R (Redevelopment) ...............
2007H (Housing) ...... ... ... ... .........
$20.2 million
$13.8 million
These funds are not currently committed, but would be significantly impacted if 1) the CDC does
authorize the defeasance of a portion of the Series 2007R TABS and/or 2) the A vram properties are not
developed as housing. The former City Hall (6750 Commerce Blvd.) and 100 and 120 Avram were
acquired using the 2007H TABS. If any or all properties are not developed as housing, the proceeds
would necessarily be repaid in proportion to the percent not developed as housing. Below is tbe
breakdown of the purchase price of these properties;
6750 Commerce Boulevard
100 A vram A venue
120 Avram Avenue
$1,137,170
$1,434,802
$1.776.026
$4,347,998
By law, redevelopment agencies are required to commence actions leading to the development of
property acquired with monies from the housing fund, including housing tax allocation bonds, within five
years after acquiring the property. 100 and 120 Avram were acquired in January 2008 and 6750
Commerce was acquired in May 2008.
2
Contractual Obligations & Commitments
The CDC has a number of contractual obligations and funding commitments; some are reviewed and
renewed each year, some are multi-year commitments and all are funded by tax increment revenues.
Annual Commitments - Redevelopment Fund
The CDC had a contractual obligation with the Rohnert Park Chamber of Commerce for support services
in furtherance of economic development. Year-to-date expenditures total $22,939; the contract is "not-to-
exceed" $50,000. The City Manager has suspended assignments under the contract until this budget
review is complete.
Each year the CDC receives a funding request from the Sonoma County Tourism Bureau (the "SCTB").
The CDC does not currently have a formal agreement with this organization; however, staffhas initiated
. discussion with the SCTB regarding the CDC's desire to secure a formal agreement with specific
deliverables. These funds enable the SCTB to promote Rohnert Park as a specific destination point. This
generates a return on investment through increased Transient Occupancy Tax ("TOT"). Without this
funding, Rohnert Park would receive limited recognition in the context of countywide promotions.
Annual Commitments - Housing Fund
The CDC has a contractual obligation and funding commitment to the Committee on the Shelterless
("COTS") for the provision of management services in support of the five CDC-owned shared living
homes and one COTS-leased transitional home (Resolution No. 2009-10). This agreement is brought
before the CDC each year for review, approval and renewal. Non-renewal of the agreement would require
the relocation of families occupying these homes.
The CDC has a contractual obligation and funding commitment to Sonoma County Adult and Youth
Development ("SCA YD") for the provision of homeless prevention services (Resolution No. 2009-11).
This agreement is brought before the CDC each year for review, approval and renewal. Non-renewal of
this agreement would discontinue the provision of one-time rental and deposit assistance to eligible
residents experiencing fmancial difficulty. .
The CDC has a contractual obligation and funding commitment to the Sonoma County Community
Development Commission (the "SCCDC") for administration of the CDC's Housing Rehabilitation
Program (Resolution No. 2009-15). This agreement is brought before the CDC each year for review,
approval and renewal. The CDC recently approved and renewed its agreement with the SCCDC. The
agreement expires on 6/30/10. SCCDC administrative fees are paid in part by the City of Rohnert Park
Development Block Grant ("CDBG") annual allocation which it receives each year, and in part by the
Housing Fund.
Each year the CDC receives a funding request from Rebuilding Together. The CDC has no contractual
obligation. Should the CDC choose not to grant an annual request for funding from Rebuilding
Together, the organization would be unable to rehabilitate the homes oflow-income homeowners,
particularly the elderly, the physically challenged, and families with children.
Multi-Year Commitments - Redevelopment Fund
The City has a lease agreement with Course Co Inc. for the management of Rohnert Park's two municipal
golf courses. As part of the lease agreement, the City is required to make an annual contribution of 1 % of
golf revenue to a Capital Improvement Fund for future golf course improvements. The contribution
requirement commenced January 2005 and increases to 2% on January 2014 through the end of the term
which is 2023 with the possibility of a ten year extension.
3
The CDC makes lease payments to the City for a total of $240,000 per year for city.owned land occupied
by the Performing Arts Center, Community Center and the Sports Center. The CDC's obligation under
the lease agreement expires on 7/7/2023.
All other commitments are debt.related and binding.
Multi-Year Commitments - Housing Fund
The CDC committed funds for the provision of social services to residents of the Vida Nueva Affordable
Housing Project in the amount of $75,000 per year for five years (Resolution No. 2006-09). This is year
two of the five year funding commitment. The CDC is committed to providing an additional $225,000
over the course of the next three years. COTS is currently the service provider.
All other commitments are debt-related and binding.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Commission review, provide direction and take appropriate action on each of
the recommendations discussed in this section. For any recommendation with which the Commission
does not concur, staff requests direction as to alternatives the Commission would like analyzed and
brought back for discussion.
1) The CDC is required to utilize tax increment generated from the project area to increase, improve and
preserve the community's supply of affordable housing (the "housing set-aside"). Over the course of the
next five years, the CDC will have approximately $2.3 million, net of debt service payments, for housing
programs. In the past, the CDC has utilized set-aside funds to support the following programs:
· COTS
· SCA YD
· Rebuilding Together
. Vida Nueva
· CDCRP Housing Rehabilitation Program
Staff recommends the CDC set aside housing set-aside funds as follows;
· $276,000 per year for community-based organizations such as: COTS, SCA YDS and Rebuilding
Together.
· $75,000 per year over the course of the next three years to honor its outstanding commitment to
Vida Nueva.
· Staff recommends eliminating the CDC allocation of$100,000 each year from the Housing Fund
to support a CDCRP Rehabilitation Program.
Residents will still have access to rehabilitation opportunities despite elimination of the $100,000 a year
allocation for a CDC Rehabilitation Program. The CDC would still be able to support rehabilitation
opportunities for low and very low income families through the CDBG Program administered by the
SCCDC. There would simply be fewer opportunities for loans to qualified applicants. In total, staff's
recommendations will generate an additional $700,000 in cash flow over five years that can be used to
fund other projects and programs.
Allocation ofthe recommended $276,000 for community organizations will be discussed during the
review and adoption of the CDC FY 2010/11 budget.
4
2) The CDC has $13.8 million in housing bond proceeds available to pursue its projects and programs.
Proposed projects and programs for FY 2009/10 through 2013/14 include the following:
Project/Program
Neighborhood Beautification Program
Implement a Neighborhood Beautification Program to provide
assistance to residential property owners for improvements such
as painting, landscaping and other improvements. This program
may also assist with the cost of undergrounding utilities in the A
Section neighborhood.
Avram Development - Request for Proposals
Preliminary Cost Estimate
$350,000
$70,000
Prepare a Request for Proposals for the development of
affordable housing at the former City Hall site and 100 and 120
Avram Avenue.
Existing City Hall Site Reuse
$4,352,000
Subsidy for development of an affordable housing project at the
former City Hall site and 100 and 120 Avram Avenue.
Southwest Shopping Center
$1,720,000
As one potential site formixed-use housing identified in the
City's Housing Element, the CDC may assist in facilitating the
redevelopment of this property, located at the southwest corner
of Adrian Drive and Southwest Boulevard. The Housing
Element anticipates that as many as 100 housing units could be
developed at this location with redevelopment of the existing
shopping center.
The Southwest Shopping Center is privately held by several
entities. Any mixed used housing project proposed for the
property would require the interest and cooperation of the
property owners.
Existing Southwest Fire Station Reuse
$2,000,000
Acquire the former fire station located at 435 Southwest
Boulevard in fiscal year 2009-10 for the purposes of either
redeveloping the property with 17 very-low income hOl,Jsing
units, or an alternative use focused on creating a public
assistance site.
Acquisition of Affordability Covenants
To Be Determined
If housing funds are available, the CDC would purchase
affordability covenants to restrict occupancy of Rohnert Park
rental units for 55 years to low and very-low-income households.
5
Staff recommends the CDC implement all of the proposed, fully funded, affordable housing projects and
programs outlined above. Staff further recommends the CDC establish a cost estimate for the acquisition
of affordability covenants in the amount of $2,000,000; and a project/program component for potential
subsidies to non-profit affordable housing developers in the amount of $3.3 million which represents the
remaining available bond proceeds. Finally, staff recommends the CDC direct staff to move forward with
. a Request for Proposals ("RFP") and developer selection for development of affordable housing at the
former City Hall site, 100 and 120 Avram and the former Southwest Station.
3) The CDC's ability to fund projects and programs through tax increment will be impacted by the state's
taking of redevelopment funds in fiscal years 2009/1 0 and 2010/11. Preliminary estimates of the amounts
taken in fiscal years 2009/10 and 2010/11 are $4.1 million and $845,119 respectively. Over the course of
the next five years, the CDC will have approximately $1.0 million in tax increment, net of debt service
payments, for redevelopment projects and programs. This availability assumes the CDC defeasance of a
portion of its Series 2007R TABS. The June 30th cash balance along with the reserve will necessarily be
held pending the outcome of the CRA lawsuit against the state and the successful defeasance of the
bonds.
Proposed projects and programs for FY 2009/10 through 2013/14 include the following:
Project/Program
Economic Development Program
In order to stimulate private investment in the Project Area, the
CDC may provide financial assistance to the Sonoma County
Tourism Bureau and engage professional services as needed
to promote economic development pending the Interim
Executive Directors assumption of his former duties which
include the promotion of economic development.
Additionally, the CDC may fund and facilitate activities and
programs that will promote economic development, attract and
retain businesses, create jobs and support workforce training
and development that meets the needs of local employers.
Preliminary Cost Estimate
$1,000,000
Staff recommends the CDC implement the proposed economic development programs at a cost of
$1,000,000. The Five Year Implementation Plan may be amended. If the California Redevelopment
Association does prevail in its lawsuit against the state, staff may bring the Plan back to the CDC for
consideration and direction.
4) The CDC currently has $20.2 million in redevelopment bond proceeds available to pursue its projects
and programs; however, it will need to defease a minimum of$10 million in bond proceeds at a cost of
$11.3 million leaving approximately $8.9 million. Proposed projects and programs for FY 2009/10
through 2013/14 include the following;
Project/Program
Property Acquisition Program
Establish a program to buy property within the Project Area to
facilitate the redevelopment of the property pursuant to the goals
and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan.
Preliminary Cost Estimate
To Be Determined
6
Project/Program
Sonoma Mountain Business Cluster
The CDC has been providing financial assistance to the
Sonoma Mountain Business Cluster to assist technology
entrepreneurs and start-up companies in achieving success
through the provision of an affordable infrastructure, an
intellectual and entrepreneurial environment, a supportive
services network and mentorship. Completion of this program
would address depreciated property values and impaired
investments in the Project Area.
Corridor Master Plans
Fund public improvements proposed in the Master Plans for
three of the City's corridor areas: Southwest Boulevard,
Commerce Boulevard and State Farm Drive.
Rohnert Park Community Center
Community Center campus wide master planning effort and
construction of first phase.
Recreational and Community Facilities Improvements
Explore opportunities to improve recreational and community
facilities serving the Project Area. Several projects have been
identified as beneficial to the Project Area, including year-round
sports turf for sports fields, an aquatics facility and water/spray
park.
Commercial District Revitalization
Implement a program to provide funding for revitalization
projects in the commercial districts within the Project Area.
Commercial Building Improvement Program
Implement a program to provide property owners with incentives
to upgrade commercial properties. A fagade improvement
program would be an example of the types of projects that the
CDC could support.
Landscape Program
Implement a landscape program to replace existing landscaping
with lower maintenance plants in order to reduce costs and
resources.
Temporary Fire St~tion Facility
Modify an existing City-owned building to utilize it as a
temporary fire station to service portions of the Project Area and
City. This facility would provide service until such time as
funding is available for a permanent facility.
Downtown In-Fill Projects
Utilize a portion of the bond proceeds for the implementation of
the Corridor Master Plans and other projects which contribute to
the development of Rohnert Park's downtown. These projects
would include those identified in the Corridor Master Plans.
Preliminary Cost Estimate
$888,000
$200,000
$2,000,000
$2,400,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$250,000
$2,300,000
7
If the Council concurs with staff's recommendation to defease of a portion of the Series 2007R TABS,
there may be implications for how items enumerated in the table above are funded. The bonds are
primarily for what are considered non-taxable projects. Some of the projects on this list do not qualify for
non-taxable investment unless the investment is done in the form of a grant or similar mechanism that has
no direct return to the CDC.
Staff recommends the CDC implement all proposed projects and programs as funding becomes
available. The preliminary cost estimate for all proposed projects totals $12,538,000. Staff estimates
that $8.9 million will be available following defeasance of a portion of the 2007R TABS. Staff
recommends the following projects be given priority and that the CDC utilizes the existing bond
proceeds, net of defeasance, to fund them:
· Recreational and Community Facilities Improvements.
· Possible relocation of Community Center Complex sculpture.
· Property acquisition program.
5) Staff recommends the CDC direct staff to bring back proposed options for the Series 2007R TABS
defeasance.
LEGAL COUNSEL'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by Legal Counsel.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item (X) Regular Item
( ) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
Per Interim Executive Director's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item.
(Revised 031309) JH:TG-S:05-b
8
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION
PROJECTS & PROGRAMS
W
o�
m ,c
Q.
Z 0
\ O 5
� o -
0 3
v
HOUSING FUND
($2.3 million)
PAST FUNDING COMMITMENTS
• COTS
• SCAYD
9
0
REBUILDING TOGETHER
VIDA NUEVA
CDC HOUSING
REHABILITATION PROGRAM
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
• $276,000 PER YEAR FOR
COMMUNITY -BASED
ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS COTS,
SCAYD AND REBUILDING
TOGETHER
• $75,000 PER YEAR OVER THE
COURSE OF THE NEXT THREE
YEARS TO HONOR OUTSTANDING
COMMITMENT TO VIDA NUEVA
• ELIMINATE CDC ALLOCATION OF
$100,000 EACH YEAR TO
SUPPORT CDCRP HOUSING
REHABILITATION PROGRAM
HOUSING BOND PROCEEDS
PROPOSED PROJECTS &PROGRAMS
($13.8 million)
7PP
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
($13.8 million)
TAX INCREMENT
IF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PREVAILS IN ITS
TAKE OF REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS, THE CDC
WILL LOSE $5 MILLION IN CASH RESERVES
OVER THE COURSE OF THE NEXT TWO FISCAL
YEARS. THIS REPRESENTS AN ENORMOUS
LOSS IN TERMS OF THE CDC'S CAPACITY TO
FUND ITS PROJECTS &PROGRAMS.
3
REDEVELOPMENT FUND
PROPOSED PROJECTS &PROGRAMS
($1 MILLION)
IN ORDER TO SIMULATE PRIVATE INVESMENT IN THE PROJECT AREA AND PROMOTE
ECONOMIC DEVELOMENT STAFF RECOMMENDS THE CDC ...
-FUND AND FACILITATE ACTIVITIES & PROGRAMS THAT WILL PROMOTE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT, ATTRACT AND RETAIN BUSINESSES, CREATE JOBS AND SUPPORT
WORKFORCE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT THAT MEETS THE NEEDS OF LOCAL
EMPLOYERS
• PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO THE SONOMA COUNTY TOURISM BUREAU
ENGAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AS NEEDED PENDING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S
ASSUMPTION OF FORMER DUTIES WHICH INCLUDES THE PROMOTION OF ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
REDEVELOPMENT BONDS
• CDC CURRENTLY HAS $20.2 MILLION IN
REDEVELOPMENT BOND PROCEEDS
• ACTUAL GROWTH RATE OF TAX
INCREMENT LESS THAN PROJECTED
• PROJECTIONS INDICATE NEGATIVE FUND
BALANCE AS EARLY AS FY 11/12
• TO ENSURE SUFFICIENT CASH FLOW TO
SERVICE ITS DEBT, CDC NEEDS TO DEFEASE
A PORTION OF ITS BONDS
• A MINIMUM OF $10.0 MILLION IN BOND
PROCEEDS, AT A COST OF $11.3 MILLION,
MUST BE DEFEASED
- APPROXIMATELY $8.9MILLION FOR
PROJECTS & PROGRAMS
$9,000,000
$8,000,000
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
S-
4
r- O M �.o M N Ln 00 -1 n
O 1— i—I 1- N N N M M M
lO M N Ln W M l0
O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N
Revised Tax Increment
Projections a/o October
15, 2009 (RSG)
Tax Increment Revenue
Projections @ Bond
Issuance (RSG)
15
PROPOSED PROJECTS & PROGRAMS
.
($8.9 million)
REDEVELOPMENT BOND PROCEEDS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
($8.9 million)
Agenda Packet Preparation T1MELINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
· Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
{This sectionfor City Clerk Use Only}
3/9/10 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 11
ORD. NO. 820
(Introduction)
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
March 9, 2010
Department:
Administration
Submitted By:
Judy Hauff, City Clerk
Submittal Date:
February 3, 2010
Agenda Title:
Campaign Finance Regulations
Requested Council Action: Introduce Ordinance No. 820 amending Rohneli Park Municipal Code
section 2.65.110, "Penalties" of Chapter 2.65, Campaign Finance
Regulations
Summary:
On November 22, 2005, the Rohnert Park City Council adopted Ordinance No. 750 adding
Chapter 2.65, Campaign Finance Regulations to the Rohnert Park Municipal Code (RPMC).
RPMC section 2.65.030 limits the amount any person may contribute to a candidate or
candidate-controlled committee to no more than five hundred dollars ($500) during an election
cycle for an elective city office and requires that the City Council review the five hundred dollar
campaign contribution limitation in January of every fourth year commencing in 2010. On
January 26, 2010, the City Council reviewed and retained the five hundred dollar limitation as
adopted by Ordinance No. 750.
Following the Council's discussion and concurrence to retain the current campaign contribution
limitation, staff recommended additional minor amendments to the penalty provisions contained
in Rohnert Park Municipal Code section 2.65.110 to reflect the Council's original intent.
Specifically, staff recommends revising the wording of subsections A and B of section 2.65.110
to mirror language contained in referenced Government Code sections 91000 and 91004.
As subsection A currently reads, an individual who otherwise acts in good faith to comply with
Chapter 2.65 yet inadvertently violates a provision of Chapter 2.65 is guilty of a misdemeanor.
"2.65.110 - Penalties.
A. Criminal Penalties. Any person who knowingly or willfully violates any provision of
this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. In addition to other penalties provided by
."
law, the penalty upon conviction of such person shall be by a fine in accordance with
Government Code Section 91000."
As subsection B currently reads, an individual who otherwise acts in good faith and exercises
reasonable care to comply with the Political Reform Act of 1974 ("Act") yet inadvertently
violates a provision of the Act may be sued in a civil action.
B. Civil Penalties. Any person who intentionally or negligently violates any prm'ision of
the Political Reform /.ct of 1971 any of the reporting requirements of this Chapter may
be sued in a civil action in accordance with Government Code Sections 91004 and
following."
Enclosures: Ordinance No. 820
California Government Code sections 91000 and 91004
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item
(X) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
(X) Regular Time
Per 1nterim City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item.
ORDINANCE NO. 820
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AMENDING SECTION
2.65.110, PENALTIES, OF CHAPTER 2.65, CAMPAIGN FINANCE REGULATIONS,
OF THE ROHNERT P ARK MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, on November 22,2005, the Rohnert Park City Council adopted Ordinance
No. 750 adding Chapter 2.65, Campaign Finance Regulations to Title 2 of the Rohnert Park
Municipal Code (RPMC);
WHEREAS, RPMC section 2.65.030 limits the amount any person may contribute to a
candidate or candidate-controlled committee to no more than five hundred dollars ($500) during
an election cycle for an elective city office;
WHEREAS, RPMC section 2.65.030 further requires the City Council review the five
hundred dollar campaign contribution limitation in January of every fourth year commencing in
2010;
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2010, the City Council reviewed and retained the five
hundred dollar limitation as adopted by Ordinance No. 750; and
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2010, the Council concurred with staffs recommendation to
amend Rohnert Park Municipal Code section 2.65.110, Penalties, to reflect the Council's original
intent and mirror the penalty provisions set forth in Government Code sections 91000 and 91004.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rohnert Park does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 2.65.100 of Chapter 2.65 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"2.65.110 - Penalties.
A. Criminal Penalties. Any person who knowingly or willfully violates any provision of
this chapter shall be guilty ofa misdemeanor. In addition to other penalties provided by
law, the penalty upon conviction of such person shall be by a fine in accordance with
Government Code Section 91000.
B. Civil Penalties. Any person who intentionally or negligently violates any of the
reporting requirements of this Chapter may be sued in a civil action in accordance with
Government Code Sections 91004 and following.
C. Cumulative Remedies. The foregoing remedies shall be deemed non-exclusive,
cumulative and in addition to any other remedy the city of Rohnert Park may have at law
or in equity."
SECTION 2: Severability. The City Council hereby declares that every section, paragraph,
sentence, clause, and phrase of this ordinance is severable. Ifany section, paragraph, sentence,
clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason found to be invalid or unconstitutional, such
1
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining
sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases.
SECTION 3: Effective Date and Publication. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30
days after its adoption, and shall be published and posted as required by law.
This ordinance was introduced by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park on March 9, 2010
and adopted on , 2010 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
2
California Government Code
91000. (a) Any person who knowingly or willfully violates any provision of this title is guilty of
a misdemeanor.
(b) In addition to other penalties provided by law, a fine of up to the greater often thousand
dollars ($10,000) or three times the amount the person failed to report properly or unlawfully
contributed, expended, gave or received may be imposed upon conviction for each violation.
(c) Prosecution for violation ofthis title must be commenced within four years after the date on
which the violation occurred.
91004. Any person who intentionally or negligently violates any of the reporting requirements
of this title shall be liable in a civil action brought by the civil prosecutor or by a person residing
within the jurisdiction for an amount not more than the amount or value not properly reported.
"3
3/9/10 City Council Agenda
.1'\
ITEM NO. 12.1
City of Rohnert Park. 130 Avram Avenue. Rohnert Park, California 94928
Phone (707) 588-2226 · Fax (707) 792-1876. www.rpcity.org
ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday, February 25, 2010, 4:00 p.m.
City Hall, 1 st Floor Conference Room # 1 E
130 A vramA venue, ROhnert Park, California
Committee Members: Pam Stafford, Mayor
Gina Belforte, Vice Mayor
City Staff: Dan Schwarz, Interim City Manager
Linda Babonis, Housing and Redevelopment Manager
0,
AGENDA
Call to OrderlRoll Call.
1. Public Comments
2. Economic Development Strategic Plan
Adjournment
Any writings or documents related to items of business referred to on this Agenda that are subject to disclosure and
submitted to the members of the Economic Developmt(nt Committee after distribution of the agenda packet will be
available for public inspection in the City Manager's Office at 130 A vrarn Avenue, Rohnert Park, CA during normal
business hours;
Disabled Accommodation: If you have a disability which requires an accommodation, an alternative format, or another
person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact (707) 588-2226 as soon as possible to ensure "
arrangements for accommodation. /) A '. .
Posted.1his 19th day of Febl1lll\Y. 2010 Housing & Redevelopment Manago/~ .:I;Jd~~
n
3/9/10 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 12.3
SONOMA COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
February 17, 2010
9:00 a.m.
City of Santa Rosa Utilities Department
Subregional Water Reclamation System Laguna Plant
4300 Llano Road, Santa Rosa, CA 95407
Estuary Meeting Room
***UNANIMOUS VOTE ITEM #8.1 ***
Estimated Ending Time 11 :30 a.m.
AGENDA
ITEM
ACTION
1. Call to Order/Introductions
2. Agenda Approval
3. Attachments/Correspondence:
. Director's Agenda Notes
. Letter from LEA dated 1/25/2010 regarding composting commercial and
residential food material
. Letter from Cold Creek Compost, Inc. dated 5/5/2008
. Letter from Cold Creek Compost, Inc. dated 2/8/2010
. Letter from ECS Refining dated 2/8/2010
4. On file w/Clerk: for CODY call 565-3579
Resolutions approved in January 2010
2010 - 001 Electing a Chair, Vice-Chair and Chair Pro Tempore for 2010
2010 - 002 Approving the Purchase Order with Delta Web Printing for Printing and
Packaging of the 2010 Sonoma County Recycling Guide
5. Public Comments (items not on the agenda)
CONSENT (w/attachments)
6.1 Minutes of January 20,2010
6.2 FY 09-10 Mid-year Financial Report
6.3 SCC Monthly Reports
6.4 Carryout Bag Update
Discussion/Action
2300 County Center Drive, Suite 8100 Santa Rosa, California 95403 Phone: 707/565-2231 Fax: 707/565-3701 www.recyclenow.orq
REGULAR CALENDAR
PLANNING
7.1) Public Hearing for Certification of Final SPEIR for the Discussion/Action
2009 Amendment to the ColWMP (continued from 1/20/10)
[Carter]
ORGANICS
8.1) Amendment to Agreement with ESA for Compost
Relocation [Carter](Attachment)
UNANIMOUS VOTE
ADMINISTRATION
9.1) Staffing Services Update Discussion/Action
[Klassen](Attachments to be provided under separate cover)
9.2) FY 10-11 Draft Work Plan Discussion/Action
[Klassen](Attachment)
9.3) Discussion of New City/County Task Force Discussion/Action
[Klassen]
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
10.1) RFP for E-waste Collection from Transfer Stations
[Stein ma n] (Attach ment)
10.2) Emergency Response Agreement for HHW
[Steinman](Attachment) (continued from 1/20/10)
Discussion/Action
Discussion/Action
11. Boardmember Comments
12. Staff Comments
13. Next SCWMA Meeting 3/17/2010
14. Adjourn
CONSENT CALENDAR: These matters include routine financial and administrative actions and are usually
approved by a single majority vote. Any Boardmember may remove an item from the consent calendar.
REGULAR CALENDAR: These items include significant and administrative actions of special interest and are
classified by program area. The regular calendar also includes "Set Matters," which are noticed hearings, work
sessions and public hearings.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Pursuant to Rule 6, Rules of Governance of the Sonoma County Waste Management Agency,
members of the pUblic desiring to speak on items that are within the jurisdiction of the Agency shall have an
opportunity at the beginning and during each regular meeting of the Agency. When recognized by the Chair, each
person should give his/her name and address and limit comments to 3 minutes. Public comments will follow the
staff report and subsequent Boardmember questions on that Agenda item and before Boardmembers propose a
motion to vote on any item.
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability that requires the agenda materials to be in an alternative
format or requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact the
Sonoma County Waste Management Agency Office at 2300 County Center Drive, Suite B100, Santa Rosa, (707) 565-
3579, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting, to ensure arrangements for accommodation by the Agency.
NOTICING: This notice is posted 72 hours prior to the meeting at The Board of Supervisors, 575 Administration
Drive, Santa Rosa, and at the meeting site the City of Santa Rosa Utilities Department Subregional Water
Reclamation System Laguna Plant, 4300 Llano Road, Santa Rosa. It is also available on the internet at
www.recvclenow.orq
2300 County Center Drive, Suite 8100 Santa Rosa, California 95403 Phone: 707/565-2231 Fax: 707/565-3701 www.recvclenow.orq
SCTA
490 MENDOCINO AVENUE, SUITE 206
SANTA ROSA, CA 95401
WWW.SCTAlNFO.ORG (707) 565-5373
RCPA
~ county t'4MPOrtflUon autbofitv
te-QtoMl (llmat-e prot~ authorttv
,_....._.____.~_.~ .~___._._. _.__._._.___._...__._.____. _,_,_,,_,___,~__,'-._~__'_ _._._..._._"__.._.,,._~_..____._~.__~____ n...._____'_'''' _._._.._,~.__.__..._.____.._..._...__...__
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA
3/9110 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 12.3
March 8, 2010- 2:30 p.m.
Sonoma County Permit & Resource Management Department
Planning Commission Hearing Room - 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA
1. Call to order the meeting of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCT A) and the Sonoma
County Regional Climate Protection Authority (RCPA)
2. Public comment on items not on the regular agenda
3. Consent Calendar
A. SCTA
3.1. Marin/Sonoma Narrows B-2 - cooperative agreement with Sonoma County Water Agency for utility
relocation design (ACTION)*
B. SCTAlRCPA Concurrent Items
3.2. Minutes of the February 8, 2010 meeting (ACTION)*
4. Regular Calendar
C. SCTA
4.1. SCT A Planning
4.1.1. Presentations on transit service (REPORT)
4.1.2. Presentation on Sonoma County travel demand model by Chris Barney (REPORT)*
4.2. SCTA Projects and Programming
4.2.1. MTC Cycle 1 federal funds - proposed block grant strategy for SCT A (ACTION)*
4.2.2. Measure M - Amendment to the Copeland Creek bicycle project description (ACTION)*
4.2.3. Highway 101 Central A project groundbreaking - March 30, 2010 (REPORT)
4.2.4. Update on State Highway projects (REPORT)
4.3. SCTAAdministration '
4.3.1. PUBLIC HEARING 3:30PM - Adopt a resolution calling an election to be consolidated with the
June 8,2010 primary election, to approve imposing a $10 vehicle registration fee to fund
congestion and pollution mitigation programs and projects; adopt a resolution imposing the fee
(ACTION)*
D. RCPA
4.4. RCPA Planning
4.4.1. RCPA goals and objectives - summary of January 29 Board workshop (ACTION)*
4.4.2. Presentation on adaptation by Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District
(REPORT)
4.5. RCPA Projects and Programming
4.5.1. Update on RCPA activities
E. SCTAlRCPA Concurrent Items
4.6. SCTAlRCPA Administration
4.6.1. Selection of SCTAlRCPA Executive Committee (ACTION)*
4.6.2. Form 700 - due to SCT A before April 1, 2010 (REPORT)
@@.~(j)
.
CI)@
(jI......'4" .
" r
..
~.
@
2
5. Reports and Announcements
5.1. SMART Report
5.2. NCRA Report
5.3. MTC Report
5.4. Executive Committee Report
5.5. Advisory Committee Agendas
5.6. SCTA Staff Report
5.7. Announcements
6. Adjourn
"Materials attached.
The next SCTAlRCPA meeting will be held April 12, 2010
Copies of the full Agenda Packet are available at 'NWW.sctainfo.org
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability that requires the agenda materials to be in an alternate fonnat or that requires an
interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact SCTA at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure
arrangements for accommodation.
SB 343 DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Sonoma
County Transportation Authority I Regional Climate Protection Authority Board of Directors after distribution of the agenda packet are
available for public inspection in the Sonoma County Transportation Authority office at 490 Mendocino Ave., Suite 206, during nonnal
business hours.
Pagers, cellular telephones and all other communication devices should be turned off during the committee meeting to avoid electrical
interference with the sound recording system.
3
SCTA
490 MENDOCINO AVENUR, SlJITR 206
SANTA ROSA, CA 95401
WW\V.SCTAINFO.ORG (707) 565-5373
RCPA
5Gnoma county trans.porlaUOfI authorJty
reqiott.al-eltma-t~ prott'ttloll authority
() \ _ _ t- pQ.)-~ _ ~ 0 ~c..'9~_~..Pf~
I\O~~ ~~ R n...n.cV-
NOTICE OF ADJOURNMENT AND CONTINUATION OF EETING~~ -'2.13--.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ~l1istr. Mtg. Of:
~ -/..:!"FWI AJn. 1:2. ~
Regular Meeting of Monday, March 8, 2010, 2:30 p. .cc:--
I Fiie~~-
Adjourned and continued to : File: ___
Friday, March 12, 2010- 1:00 p.m. at the following location:
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
SCTA Conference Room - 490 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 206, Santa Rosa, CA
Call to order the meeting of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCT A) and the Sonoma County
Regional Climate Protection Authority (RCPA)
Public comment on items not on the regular agenda
4.3 Continuance of Item 4.3 SCT A Administration
4.3.1 PUBLIC HEARING - Adopt a resolution calling an election to be consolidated with the June 8,
2010 primary election, to approve imposing a $10 vehicle registration fee to fund congestion and
pollution mitigation programs and projects; adopt a resolution imposing the fee (ACTION)
Adjourn
The next SCTAlRCPA meeting will be held April 12, 2010
Copies of the full Agenda Packet are available at www.sctainfo.org
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability that requires the agenda materials to be in an alternate format or that requires an
interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact SCTA at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure
arrangements for accommodation.
SB 343 DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Sonoma
County Transportation Authority / Regional Climate Protection Authority Board of Directors after distribution of the agenda packet are
available for public inspection in the Sonoma County Transportation Authority office at 490 Mendocino Ave., Suite 206, during normal
business hours.
Pagers, cellular telephones and all other communication devices should be turned off during the committee meeting to avoid electrical
interference with the sound recording system.
@@~(j)
.
~@
@
"1
SCTA
490 MENDOCINO AVI'.NlJR, SUITE 206
SANTA ROSA, CA 95401
WW\V.SCrAlNFO.ORG (707) 565-5373
RCPA
S()MmJ c:oooty traMportatlcm authority
fMJl-onal cflmiJt~ 'Prot~tlol'l: authofUy
Staff Report
To:
SCT A Directors
From:
Suzanne Smith, Executive Director
Item:
4.3.1: PUBLIC HEARING 3:30PM - Adopt a resolution calling an election to
be consolidated with the June 8,2010 primary election, to approve
imposing a $10 vehicle registration fee to fund congestion and pollution
mitigation programs and projects; adopt a resolution imposing the fee
Date:
March 12, 2010
Issue:
Shall the SCTA adopt a resolution calling an election to be consolidated with the June 8,2010 primary
election, to approve establishing a $10 vehicle registration fee to fund congestion and pollution
mitigation programs and projects?
What are the implications, benefits and risks of taking such a measure to voters in March 2010 instead
of November 2010 or a future year?
Shall the SCT A propose to use the fee for transit and bicycle purposes?
BackQround:
SB 83 (Hancock) authorizes a countywide transportation planning agency such as the seTA, by a
majority vote of board, to propose an annual fee of up to $10 on motor vehicles registered within the
county for transportation programs and projects. The bill requires simple majority voter approval of the
measure. The bill requires the DMV, if requested, to collect the additional fee and distribute the net
revenues to the agency, after deduction of specified costs, and would limit the SCTA administrative
costs to not more than 5% of the distributed fees.
The bill requires that the fees collected be used only to pay for programs and projects bearing a
relationship or benefit to the owners of motor vehicles paying the fee that are consistent with a regional
transportation plan, and requires the agency's board to make a specified finding of fact in that regard.
Numerous studies, summarized in the attached documents, have demonstrated the economic and
health benefits to vehicle owners from congestion relief. The proposed resolution also makes specific
findings in this regard. The bill also requires the governing board of the countywide transportation
planning agency to adopt an expenditure plan, but the detailed plan can be adopted after the resolution
is approved, since funds will not be collected until six months following adoption of the measure by the
voters.
Several Bay Area transportation agencies are considering placing the vehicle registration fee measure
on the November 2010 ballot. Since the February SCTA meeting staff has contacted other counties
regarding polling. Unfortunately we missed the opportunity to join in a poll organized by Alameda
County Transportation Authority and one done by Transportation Authority of Marin. Both polls from
those counties show support in the low to mid 60% range for a vehicle license fee to be used for
transportation purposes. Summaries are attached.
\
Sonoma County can look to several past ballot measures results that relate directly to transportation
funding, including a very transit specific measure in 2000 and the SMART measures in 2006 and 2008.
Year Name Type/Amount % Support Notes
1998 Measure B
1998 Measure C
2000 Measure B
2000 Measure C
2004 Measure M
2006 Measure R
2008 Measure Q
Advisory
1/2 cent
Hwy 101, 1/2 cent
Transit, 1/4 cent
Multimodal, 1/4 cent
Rail, 1/4 cent
Rail, 1/4 cent
72.4% Non-binding expenditure plan
47.6% General tax; simple majority
58.5% Specific tax; 2/3rds majority
60.3% Specific tax; 2/3rds majority
67.2% Specific tax; 2/3rds majority
70.1% Specific tax; 2/3rds majority; Sonoma only results
73.7% Specific tax; 2/3rds majority; Sonoma only results
. .. ...
For comparison purposes a % cent sales tax is estimated to cost a family of three approximately $100
annually. The proposed vehicle license fee would cost that same family $30 assuming all three
members have a vehicle.
The cost for SCTA to conduct its own poll will be approximately $25,000. The cost to place a measure
on the ballot will be approximately $75,000-$100,000. Staff recommends the Board consider not
moving forward with a poll at this time but instead consider going directly to the ballot in June 2010.
The rationale behind this recommendation is as follows:
Competition on the November ballot will be significant and will likely include a State Parks
measure tied to vehicle registration fees
Analysis of previous Sonoma County measures indicate significant levels of support for
transportation including high levels of support for transit
A transit and bicycle measure fits well with the newly created RCPA and provides a degree
of balance between modes given Measure M included significant levels of funding for
Highway 101 and local roads (80% total)
With the dramatic impacts to transit over the past two years coupled with no good news in
sight from the State on transit funding this new source could help maintain and improve local
transit
. More cars are sold in the last half of the year (highest number in October) and thus seeking
an increase earlier in the year may provide an advantage in terms of voters making
registration payment further from the time of the election
The earlier a fee is established the sooner it can be put to use improving transportation
. A simple ballot measure that focuses on two transportation components could have appeal
in terms of its brevity and clarity
. It is unlikely anyone will significantly fund a campaign in this climate so going early isn't
going to hamper the campaign efforts
The downside of proceeding quickly includes:
~
. Being first out on this type of funding source could create some legal risk if there is a
challenge to the validity of a local fee
The state of the economy will make any new revenue measure difficult to achieve but it is
unlikely to be much different in November 2010
There will be limited discussion how to spend the revenues
. There will likely be other local revenue related measures on the ballot in June
. There will be no polling in Sonoma County on this specific effort
The proposed content of the expenditure plan and eligible projects is focused on transit and
bicycle/pedestrian programs and projects. Below is a table highlighting the proposed split and likely
revenue generated in the first 5 years.
The transit funding (69%) would be split between local bus transit operators on a population
basis using the same formula as provided for in Measure M and formalized in the annual
Coordinated Claim.
The Safe Routes to School (15%) program would be administered by the SCTA in
conjunction with outside contractors and would be an extension of the limited program
already in existence.
The bike paths and pedestrian projects (12%) would be defined through a public process
that includes an annually competitive program. Projects would need to be included in the
SCTA Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.
The SCT A would use up to 4% of the funds for administrative purposes including
accounting, audits and program management.
$10 Vehicle Registration Fee - Expenditure Plan Funding Split (PROPOSED DRAFT)
Transit operations $ 3,439,033 $ 3,459,668 $ 3,480,426 $ 3,501,308 $ 3,522,316
Safe Routes to School $ 747,616 $ 752,102 $ 756,614 $ 761,154 $ 765,721
Bike paths $ 598,093 $ 601,681 $ 605,291 $ 608,923 $ 612,577
Administration $ 199,364 $ 200,560 $ 201,764 $ 202,974 $ 204,192
Total $ 4,984,107 $ 5,014,011 $ 5,044,095 $ 5,074,360 $ 5,104,806
Policv Impacts:
The SCTA has placed measures before the voters of Sonoma County. In 2004 Measure M, a quarter
cent sales tax was developed by the SCT A and placed on the ballot by the Board of Supervisors. It was
approved by over 2/3rds of the voters. SB83 provides a new funding option to the SCT A that does not
require a 2/3 vote threshold for approval.
Fiscal Impacts:
The cost to place this item on the ballot will be approximately $75,000-$100,000. Staff proposes to use
existing revenue derived from MTC and local jurisdictions' contributions to the SCT A to cover these
costs if the measure is not successful. If the measure passes then this cost would come off the top of
the first year of revenue.
~
With a brief analysis of registered vehicles in Sonoma County, staff has developed the following
revenue projections that could be generated from a 20 year vehicle $10 registration fee. Registered
vehicle information is derived from MTC, DMV and ABAG data.
# of
years $10 fee
1 $4,984,106.50
2 $5,014,011.14
3 $5,044,095.21
4 $5,074,359.78
5 $5,104,805.94
6 $5,135,434.77
7 $5,166,247.38
8 $5,197,244.86
9 $5,228,428.33
10 $5,259,798.90
11 $5,291,357.70
12 $5,323,105.84
13 $5,355,044.48
14 $5,387,174.74
15 $5,419,497.79
16 $5,452,014.78
17 $5,484,726.87
18 $5,517,635.23
19 $5,550,741.04
20 $5,584,045.49
Total $105,573,876.77
Staff Recommendation:
Consider approving Resolution Nos. 2010-005 and 2010-006 calling an election to be consolidated with
the June 8, 2010 primary election, to approve imposing a $10 vehicle registration fee to fund
congestion and pollution mitigation programs and projects and adopting a resolution imposing the fee.
l.\
Resolution No. 2010-005
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
Santa Rosa,' California
March 12, 2010
Resolution Of The Board Of Directors Of The Sonoma County
Transportation Authority, State Of California, Calling A Special
Election To Be Held On June 8,2010, To Approve A Resolution
Imposing A Congestion And Pollution Mitigation Fee To Be
Collected On Vehicles Registered In The County For The Next 20
Years, And Requesting Consolidation Of The Election With Any
Other Election Held On The Same Day In Territory That Is The
Same Or Is In Part The Same Jurisdiction
Resolved, by the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority ("S.C.T.A."),
that:
Whereas, state law authorizes a countywide transportation planning agency, with voter approval,
to adopt a mitigation fee of up to $10 per registered motor vehicle, to fund congestion and/or
pollution mitigation programs and projects; and
Whereas, this Board wishes to propose that a mitigation fee of $10 per registered motor vehicle be
imposed for a period of 20 years to fund the congestion and pollution mitigation programs and
projects set out in Resolution No. 2010-006, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and wishes to call a
special election on whether such resolution should be approved, and consolidate the election on
such measure with any other election being conducted in the jurisdiction of Sonoma County on
June 8, 2010, the date of the statewide primary election; and
Now, therefore, the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority hereby
resolves and orders as follows:
1. The Board reiterates and confirms that its findings set out in Resolution No. 2010-
006, attached hereto as Exhibit A, are true and correct.
2. The Board hereby calls a special election on whether Resolution No. 2010-006,
imposing a congestion and pollution mitigation fee of $10 for 20 years on each motor vehicle
registered in the County of Sonoma, should be approved, and requests that the election on such
measure be consolidated with any other election being conducted in the jurisdiction of Sonoma
County on June 8, 2010, the date of the statewide primary election.
3. The Board finds and declares that the Authority has complied with all laws requiring
notice of the actions contained herein, and has held a public hearing as required by law.
4. The proposition shall be submitted to the voters on the ballot in the following form:
In order to sustain and improve local bus service throughout
Sonoma County, build more bicycle and pedestrian projects Yes
and create a countywide Safe Routes to School program, shall
the Sonoma County Transportation Authority establish a $10
annual vehicle registration fee to be collected for 20 years? No
s
Resolution No. 2010-005
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
Santa Rosa, California
March 8, 2010
5. The ballot to be used at the election shall be both as to form and matter contained
therein such as may be required by law.
6. The Sonoma County Registrar of Voters is hereby authorized, instructed, and
directed to provide and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter, and all supplies,
equipment, and paraphernalia that may be necessary to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
7. The Sonoma County Registrar of Voters is hereby further directed to take the
necessary and appropriate actions to provide the necessary election officers, polling places, and
voting precincts for the election.
8. The polls for the election shall be open during the hours required by law, and the
election shall be held and conducted as provided by law.
9. Notice of time and place of holding the election, together with any other notices
required by law, shall be given by the Sonoma County Registrar of Voters.
10. Arguments for and against the measure may be, and other analyses provided for by
law shall be, submitted in accordance with law. The Chair of the Board of the Authority, or his
designee, is authorized to submit an argument in favor of the measure on behalf of the Board.
11. It is hereby requested that the election be consolidated with any other election held
on the same date in territory that is the same or in part the same.
12.. The Clerk of the Board is directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the
Sonoma County Board of Supervisors and to the Sonoma County Registrar of Voters.
The Foregoing Resolution was moved by Director _' seconded by Director _' and adopted on
roll call by the following vote:
Director Brown
Director Gallian
Director Gilardi
Director Glass
Director Gurney
Director Kelly
Director Mackenzie
Director McGuire
Director Russell
Director Salmon
Director Wysocky
Director Zane
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
Whereupon, the Chair declared the foregoing resolution adopted, So Ordered
I, the undersigned, certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of
the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority held on March 12, 2010.
Suzanne Smith, Executive Director
Clerk, Sonoma County Transportation Authority
\J)
Resolution No. 2010-006
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
Santa Rosa, California
March 12, 2010
Resolution Of The Board Of Directors Of The Sonoma County
Transportation Authority, State Of California, Imposing A
Congestion and Pollution Mitigation Fee To Be Collected On
Motor Vehicles Registered In The County For The Next 20 Years
Resolved, by the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority ("S.C.IA"),
that:
Whereas, state law authorizes a countywide transportation planning agency, with simple majority
voter approval, to adopt a mitigation fee of up to $10 per registered motor vehicle, to fund
congestion and/or pollution mitigation programs and projects; and
Whereas, S.C.T.A. is the transportation planning agency for the County of Sonoma; and
Whereas, this Board wishes to propose that a mitigation fee of $10 per registered motor vehicle be
imposed for a period of 20 years to fund the congestion and pollution mitigation programs and
projects as described in this Resolution:
Now, therefore, the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority hereby
finds, determines, resolves, and orders as follows:
I. Findings.
(a) Each registered motor vehicle driven on the streets and highways of Sonoma
County contributes to congestion. Traffic congestion occurs when the number of vehicles using a
transportation facility exceeds the capacity of that facility. Individual drivers contribute to
congestion in the following ways:
i) Increased desire to travel or increased vehicles on roadways increase congestion.
ii) Peak Hour Travel: when a high proportion of travelers attempt to use the system at
the same time, congestion is worsened.
iii) Vehicle Merging Maneuvers: motorists entering and leaving the traffic flow
contribute to increased congestion.
(b) Congestion on streets and highways imposes the following impacts on community
members, drivers, businesses and commuters:
i) Wasted time: reducing economic productivity and efficiency.
ii) Delay: resulting in late arrival, resulting in lost business or other losses.
iii) Reliability: travelers are unable to estimate travel time accurately, leading drivers to
allocate more time to travel, and less time on productive activities.
iv) Wasted fuel: increasing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, plus
consuming a finite resource (fossil fuel) in an unproductive manner limits availability for other
energy needs.
v) Increased wear and tear on vehicles due to increase vehicle idling: imposing
additional vehicle maintenance costs for persons and businesses.
..,
Resolution No. 2010-006
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
Santa Rosa, California
March 12, 2010
V. Effective Date.
This resolution shall become effective upon certification by the Registrar of Voters of its
approval by a majority of the voters voting on the measure.
The Foregoing Resolution was moved by Director _' seconded by Director _' and was
adopted on roll call by the following vote:
Director Brown
Director Gallian
Director Gilardi
Director Glass
Director Gurney
Director Kelly
Director Mackenzie
Director McGuire
Director Russell
Director Salmon
Director Wysocky
Director Zane
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
Whereupon, the Chair declared the foregoing resolution adopted, So Ordered
I, the undersigned, certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of
the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority held on March 12, 2010.
Suzanne Smith, Executive Director
Clerk, Sonoma County Transportation Authority
\0
Resolution No. 2010-006
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
Santa Rosa, California
March 12, 2010
(e) The programs and projects to be funded by the fee are consistent with the regional
transportation plan adopted by this Authority pursuant to Government Code section 65080.
II. Expenditure Plan; Programs and Projects.
(a) Staff is directed to develop an Expenditure Plan with detailed programs and projects
meeting the following criteria:
i. 69% will go to local bus transit operations based on a population formula as
formalized annually in the Coordinated Claim adopted by the SCT A.
ii. 12% will go to bicycle and pedestrian projects throughout Sonoma County. These
projects must be included in the SCTA Countywide Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan. The funding
will be distributed annually, on a competitive basis, by the SCTA.
iii. 15% will go to a countywide Safe Routes to School program that will include bicycle
and pedestrian safety for teens and children; carpool programs at schools throughout Sonoma
County and other related programs or projects that reduce car trips to schools and promote
transportation safety.
iv. No more than 4% will go to the SCT A for administrative purposes including
accounting, audits and legal services, reporting to the public and program administration.
(b) The programs and projects proposed in the Expenditure Plan should, in total, equal
or exceed the congestion reduction estimates set out in Section I(d) above.
Before any particular project begins, any legally required environmental evaluation will be
completed. Revenue raised by the fee may be used to complete the environmental work and for
other project development phases such as design or environmental mitigation.
(c) In developing the Expenditure Plan, staff shall take reasonable steps to ensure
community participation in the development of the Plan. The Plan shall be presented to this Board
for adoption within six months of approval of this resolution by the voters, at a noticed public
meeting.
III. Contract with Department of Motor Vehicles.
Upon approval of this resolution by the voters, staff is directed to develop a contract with
the Department of Motor Vehicles for approval by this Board, governing collection of the fee and
disbursement to the Authority.
IV. C.E.Q.A.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines section
15378(b)(4), adoption of the resolution is not a "project" subject to the requirements of CEQA,
because it is the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any
commitment to any specific project. The Clerk of the Board is directed to post a Notice of
Exemption in the form required by law.
q
Resolution No. 2010-006
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
Santa Rosa, California
March 12, 2010
vi) Public health impacts: increased stress and air quality related health impacts.
vii) Emergencies: congestion may interfere with the efficient and timely deployment of
emergency vehicles and services.
viii) Spillover traffic from highways and main arterials to secondary roads and side
streets: can have local safety and quality of life impacts.
(c) The programs, services and projects to be funded by the fee will partially mitigate
the effects of traffic congestion and congestion induced pollution, and will produce a benefit to the
vehicle owners subject to the fee by reducing commute time, decreasing individual auto related
expenses, and improving air quality through reduced pollution. Studies indicate that reducing
congested roadway traffic volumes even 5% can reduce travel delay by 10-30%. Increased transit
and bicycle/pedestrian use take an estimate of 1 vehicle off the road for each bike or walking trip
and from .25 to .70 vehicles off the road for each transit rider. Anticipated congestion
improvements include but are not limited to:
i) Reduced delay, and improved productivity and economic efficiency.
ii) Increased travel reliability.
iii) Reduced fuel consumption and vehicle maintenance costs.
iv) Improved air quality
v) Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
vi) Improved public health
vii) Better provision of emergency services.
viii) Reduced impacts to local neighborhoods from spillover traffic.
(d) The cost of the programs and projects listed in Section II below equal or exceed the
anticipated revenue to be raised by the fee. The congestion relief and air quality improvement
benefits to each motor vehicle owner are predicted to equal or exceeds the per vehicle yearly fee,
and will continue to do so for at least 20 years.
The economic benefit of reduced congestion can be calculated using the following methodologies:
DELAY: The U.S Federal Highway's Administration currently estimates that each hour of delay
(time spent traveling under congestion) costs us roughly $12. Sonoma County currently
experiences 53,226 hours of delay each day (estimated financial cost $638,712/day or $233
million/year). A reduction of 1138 hours/day (2% reduction) in daily delay would provide a
congestion reduction benefit equal to the $10 per vehicle per year proposed fee.
TRIPS: Congestion reduction benefits per reduced automobile-mile are estimated to be worth
roughly $0.25 per mile during urban peak hour conditions. The average trip length in Sonoma
County is 13.08 miles per trip; therefore each vehicle trip reduced would save all county
commuters roughly $3.27. A reduction of 4,176 trips from the 1,720,290 current Sonoma County
daily vehicle trips (or a 0.24% reduction in daily vehicle trips) will provide a congestion reduction
benefit equal to the $10 per vehicle per year proposed fee. 200,798 daily trips are currently made
using transit or non-motorized modes. The additional 4,176 trips would represent a 2% increase in
transit or non-motorized trips.
'i
AMIE
Chevron Service Stations
Castino Restaurant Equipment
Rotten Robbie
Shell Service Station
W.W. Grainger
JAKE
CVS/Pharmacy
Food Max
Pape Machinery
In-n-Out
O'Dell Printing Co.
JOE
Home Depot
JE Higgins Lumber Co
Petsmart
Raley's
Exxon Service Station
GINA
Burlington Coat Factory
Target
McPhail's Appliances
Ross
Safeway
PAM
Costco
Hertz
Olive Garden
.\of ;~5 ~\es/ USI2.- \C4-i ~\t-r~\o"rt'O{;;;
G e..A) e;rq t-e... 1...:,6"f Cl c;"r +< t'~ ).).~~
c__ c,d ~ c_ ~<:>i.... ce- -.} e,J;"\ U JJ-.
101 International Truck Sales
Wal-Mart
o ~ I(o--r\l-. .:Pre5'c--{i.PF(I
" ~'\~y ~-.~
~-<~~.vo-
. Mtg. Of: ~~ ~~
L-n:"^ . '1 =
Calendar of Events
Next Council Meeting March 9, 2010
Wednesday, 2/24
State of the City Address
6:30pm Performing Arts Center (PS)
Thursday, 2/25
RRWA Board of Directors - phone conference
9am (JM)
Friday, 2/26
BEA (Business Environmental Alliance)
7:00am Hyatt Vineyard Creek (PS, GB, JM)
Monday, 3/1
WAC / TAC Meeting (JM)
Wednesday, 3/4
Noon Times
11:45am Wedgewood Banquet Center (PS/JC)
Friday, 3/5
Health Action Meeting
8am-l0am. 1030 Apollo Way, SR
Friday, 3/5
Water Issues Subcommittee
4:15pm Council Chambers (GB/JM)
Monday, 3/8
SCTA
2:30pm Santa Rosa (JM)
Tuesday, 3/16
Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors Meeting (PS)
Wednesday, 3/17
Goodwill VIP Reception
5:30-7:00 p.m. 6591 Commerce
3/22
WAC/TAC
9am RP City Hall Chambers (JM/GB)
t.
City of Rohnert Pork
03/09/10 City Council Agenda
Item No. 14.4
City of Cotati
Sonoma County, California
February 24, 2010
Subject: Letter of Interest for Sonoma County Child Care Planning Council
To: Sonoma County Mayors and Council Members Association
this letter will serve as my interest in serving as a representative on the Sonoma County Child Care
Planning Council.
As a mother who raised three children while working full time, I understand the importance of
providing quality care for our children. I was fortunate that I was able to obtain quality care for my
children during their formative years. I feel strongly that quality care Is important not only for the
growth of our children, but also for the ability of their parents to focus on being productive workers
without worrying about the care of their children.
It would be an honor to serve on this council to ensure that Sonoma County has quality, accessible and
affordable child care.
Thank you,
Susan
~~rtwJct4
Susan Harvey 0
City Council Member
Cotati, CA
201 West Sierra Avenue, Cotati, CA 94931-4217 - TELEPHONE 707-792-4600 _ P^X 707-795-7067
jur 1\ S,,", \\ YU,
(" nu; lei 1$1K';lii~?'r
March 3, 2010
Mary Bowman, Clerk, City Selection Committee
Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmembers
RE: Airport Land Use Commission Position
Please consider this letter as my formal request to continue my service on
the Airport Land Use Commission. My current term expires in May, 2010.
In working on the Commission during the past years, I have gained valuable
and unique experiences which are necessary to fulfilling current and future
decision-making responsibilities.
I am asking for your supportso I may continue serving our community on
this important Commission.
Thank you for your consideration.
c- . --"'-=:::::'''''-.' -. -..",
L- .~- "'~-,- '-..,
---..
."._,,-~ ~
-.-""".... ._-",.-' ~ :7 ~
" "''''''--,-,,,,, .-----'"
"'>......,""............,
JOHN SAW'rER---
Councilmember
(}J\^J"'''''''--''''''
JS/sks
f:\council\members\sawyerairportlandusecomniiSSion. doc
City Council
Pam Stafford
Mayor
Gina Belforte
Vice-Mayor
Amie Breeze
Joseph T. Callinan
Jake Mackenzie
Council Members
Dan Schwarz
Interim City Manager
Judy Hauff
City Clerk
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon
City Attomey
James J. Atencio
Benjamin D. Winig
Assistant City Attomeys
Brian Masterson
Director of Public Safety
Darrin W. Jenkins
Director of Development Services /
City Engineer
Sandra M. Lipitz
Director of Administrative Services
John McArthur
Director of Public Works &
Community Services
March 1,2010
Mary Bowman, Clerk City Selection Committee
Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmembers
City of Cloverdale City of Santa Rosa
City of Cotati City of Sebastopol
City of Healdsburg City of Sonoma
City of Petal urn a Town of Windsor
City ofRohnert Park
Re: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)
Dear Mayors and Councilmembers and City Selection Committee,
I am contacting your City Council and the Board of Supervisors to request
support for appointment to the Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO).
I currently serve as the Alternate Commissioner for LAFCO and am actively
engaged in government on a local level as a Mayor. I also have served as a
City Councilmember and Planning Commissioner. My work on the Planning
Commission makes the prospect of reviewing, approving, or disapproving
changes in city and special district organization exciting. Also, I have been a
business owner for 30 years.
I would appreciate a chance to be your LAFCO representative and request
your vote. Please contact me if you have questions at (707) 584-5892 or
email pstafford@rpcity.org.
Sincerely,
9~.~
Pam Stafford
Mayor, City of Rohnert Park
cc: Mary Gourley, City Clerk, City of Sebastopol
130 Avram Avenue. Rohnert Park, CA. 94928 (707) 588-2226 fax: (707) 792-1876
www.rpcitv.org
TOWNOF ..
WINDSOR
Thwn of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway
P.O. Box 100
Windsor,CA 95492..0100
Phone: (707) 838-1000
F8!l.: (707) 838-7349
www.townofwiadsor.eom
Mayor
Sam Salmon
Vice Mayor
Steve Allen
Council members
Debora Fudge
Robin Goble
Cheryl Scholar
Town Manager
1. Matthew Mullan
Printed on recycJed paper &}
... ...--...-.', .:....-...... ._.:.... .~_... --..-....... "
February 24~ 2010
Sonoma County Mayors~ and Councilmembers' Association
7120 Bodega Avenue
Sebastopol, CA 95472
RE: LAFCO Appointment
Dear Mayors and Councilmembers:
I am asking for your support to again fill the position on LAFCO. I have brought
a lot to the table for the past four years. As a civil engineer, I have over thirty-two
years of experience working with local agencies and have worked extensively
with the issues and needs involved with annexations. As a member of the agency,
I have used my expertise to work with the rest of the commissioners to make
logical and well thought out decisions. I currently serve as the Vice-Chair of the
Commission.
I am proud of my record, and would appreciate the opportunity to serve again. I
thank you for your consideration.
~,
~e
Steve Allen,
Vice Mayor
cc: Town .CoWlcll
M. Mullan
Because time is of the essence, please ask your Council members to submit their letters of interest to the Mayors in
the Sonoma County Mayors 'and Councilmembers' Association and Mary Gourley, City Clerk/Program Manager,
City of Sebastopol by March 2, 2010. 111is should provide enough time to allow review at each of your own
Council meetings prior to the February 11,2010 Board meeting.
I realize this request doesn't allow much time, but in order to fill the vacancies as quickly as possible, we need to
move forward with your letters of interest as soon as possible.
Thank you for your expeditious assistance.
Sincerely,
ff~~~y
Sarah Glade GUey
Mayor
Cf: Sonoma County Board of Supervisors
League of California Cities Representative
City Clerks
Clerk of the Board
[This sectionfor City Clerk Use Only]
City of Rohnert Park
03/09/10 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 14.3
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL
City Hall
7120 Bodcga Avcnue
Post Office Box 1776
SebastopoI, CA 95473-1776
707-823-1153 - Phone
707-823-1135 - Fax
&nail: m,!{OurIeV@sonic.net
Web Site: www.ci.sebastopol.ca.us
SEBASTOPOL
tQ,,,,1 flav-u... C'ob,,1 \/Is.ll}n.
CITY MANAGEH
Jack Griflill
MAYOR
Sarah Glade Gumey
CITY CLEHK/PROGRAM MANAGER
Mary Gourley
CITY COUNCIL
Guy \VilsolI. Vice Mayor
Linda Kelley
Larry RobillSOIl
Kathleen ShalIer
February 22, 20 I 0
Sonoma County Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association
Dear Mayors:
The Board of Directors for the Sonoma County Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association will hold its second
regular meeting of201O on April 8, 2010. The location has been changed from Rohnert Park to Santa Rosa:
Date:
Time:
Th~day,ApriI8,2010
6;00 p,m. - Reception - Location: TBD
6:00 p.m. - City Selection Committee Meeting - Location: TBD
Board Meeting - Following the City Selection Committee - Location: TBD
Dinner/General Membership Meeting - Following the Board Meeting - Location: TBD
City of Santa Rosa will be hosting the April 8, 20 I 0 Meeting/Dinner and a location will be sent out once it has been
established.
One of the major business items for this meeting will be to consider appointments to the following Boards and
Commissions:
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) - (Appointed by the City Selection Committee) _ to fill
the vacancy created by Steve Allen (Windsor) - Expiration afTerm: May/2010. Four YearTenn: May
2010-May 2014
Airport Land Use Commission - (Appointed by the City Selection Committee) - to fill the vacancy
created by John Sawyer (Santa Rosa) - Expiration of Term: May/20ll. Four Year Term: May 2010-
May 2014
Sonoma County Child Care Planning Council Committee - to fill the vacancy created by Marsha Vas
Dupre (Santa Rosa) - Expiration afTerm. Three Year Term- March 2010 through March 2013
There were no letters of interest submitted for the last Board meeting.
-I
Fund
Santa Rosa Capital Fund
Petaluma Capital Fund
Sonoma Capital Fund
Sonoma Rev Bond Fund 2003
Storage Rev Bond Fund 2003
Storage Rev Bond Fund 2006
Common Rev Bond Fund 2003
Common Rev Bond Fund 2006
State Loan Debt Service
State Loan Reserve
Agency Fund (Discretionary)
Agency Fund (Charges)
Pipeline Facilities
Storage Facilities
Common Facilities
North Marin
Water Management Planning
Watershed Planning./Restoration
Recycled Water & Local Supply
Water Conservation
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
Water Transmission System
Operatinq Transfers (OT)
Index
675207
675215
675231
675470
675462
675488
675454
675496
675439
675447
675108
675413
675405
675421
675512
675710
675728
675736
675744
FY 10-11
aT Out (8625) aT In (4625)
870,000 0
o
o
o
o
225,000
o
o
o
o
2,703,500
o
o
o
o
[)
,.: /;
; ,
361,
401 2G
1,1
o
('
,
870,000
648,700
2,545,399
76,300
200,000
1,onA99
Total
^1,572,999
12,054,156
\\FILESERVER\Data\Admgt\cminkel\Budget\FY 1011 \Copy of Budget Water Transmission FY 10-11 022410 OT sheet
2/25/20103:21 PM
~
12,054,156
SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
RUSSIAN RIVER CONSERVATION CHARGE COMPUTATION
FISCAL YEAR 2010-11
PROPERTY ASSESSMENT VALUES AS OF FY 09 -10:
TAX CODE
14000
42800
43500
43800
44500
45000
ENTITY
SECURED
$312,595,774
889,906,830
7,372,195,051
3,827,719,691
18,213,857,671
1,952,146,154
2,560,676,896
$35,129,098,067
Forestville Co Water District
City of Cotati
City of Petaluma
City of Rohnert Park
City of Santa Rosa
City of Sonoma
Valley of the Moon Water District
TOTAL
Notes:
1 Total value of secured and unsecured property in service areas of Prime Water
Contractors of Sonoma County (see above)
2 2009-10 Sonoma County tax rate per $100 of full cash value assessed
for payment of Warm Springs Dam Project Obligations
UNSECURED
$2,769,439
18,137,647
432,535,243
118,715,164
668,697,067
54,522,542
22,526,019
$1,317,903,121
3 Total tax levied on citizens residing in service areas of Prime Water Contractors of
Sonoma County, Le., (Line 1/100) x Line 2
4 Total acre feet of water delivered to Prime Water Contractors of Sonoma County
(not incuding North Marin) during the last 12 month period
5 Total Russian River Conservation Charge per Acre Foot (Line 3/ Line 4)
A- 43
TOTAL VALUE
$315,365,213
908,044,477
7,804,730,294
3,946,434,855
18,882,554,738
2,006,668,696
2,583,202,915
$36,447,001,188
$36,447,001,188
0.007
$2,551,290
34,190,98
$74,62
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
Operations and Maintenance Rate Computation
o & M REVENUE REQUIREMENT
ESTIMATED FiSCAL YEAR 10/11 EXPENDITURES
$37,880,774
LESS:
Depreciation
Investment Income, Interest on Pooled Cash, Charges for Services
Power Sales
PWRPA Pre-paid Expense - FY 08/09 Rate Reduction-One time only
Reserve Restoration Surcharge
Recycled Water funds (Sub-object 7277) taken from special reserve
Transfers Out
5,400,000
83,680
875,000
REVENUE REQUIREMENT (Net Expenditures)
o
o
8,255,656
$23,266,438
o & M ACRE FOOT BASE
AVERAGE DELIVERIES - PAST 12 MONTHS
LESS:
49,853,0
Marin Municipal
Surplus (Irrigation)
TOTAL BASE DELIVERIES
7,183.9
94.1
42,575,0
0& M RATE COMPUTATION:
Rate = Revenue Requirement - (Marin Muni Off Peak Deliveries x Highest Prime Rate)
- (Marin Muni Surplus Deliveries x (O&M Charqe + Capital Charqe)
Total Deliveries - Surplus Deliveries - Marin Muni Past 36 Months Deliveries
= 23,266,438 - (4,300.00 x 684.14) - (2.883.93 x 625.40)
49,853.0 - 94.1 - 7,183.9
*
= $434.78
A- 42
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: lwater Conservation
Section/Index No: 675744 I
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 22,996 574,756 350,477
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 32,738 4,816 31,413 (5,156) (36,569) (116.42%)
SUBTOTAL 32,738 4,816 31,413 (5,156) (36,569) (116.42%)
Interqovernmental Revenue
2911 City of Santa Rosa 147,197 (57,562) 0 0 0 N/A
2912 Town of Windsor 104,911 92,800 110,045 100,969 (9,076) (8.25%)
2913 City of Petaluma 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
2914 City of Rohnert Park 67,549 0 0 0 0 N/A
2916 City of Cotati 0 0 0 100,969 100,969 N/A
2919 City of Sonoma 44,860 (5,943) 0 0 0 N/A
2951 North Marin Water District 125,515 (6,806) 0 0 0 N/A
2954 Town of Windsor 3,190 2 0 0 0 N/A,
SUBTOTAL 493,222 22,491 110,045 201,938 91,893 83,50%
Miscellaneous Revenue
3980 Revenue Applicable to Prior Ye 2,300 0 N/A
4040 Miscellaneaous Revenue 874 678 0 N/A
4102 Donations/Reimbursements 73,240 0 0 0 0 N/A
Retailer Program Reimb=$488,763
Prop 50 - Washer Rebate = $126,053
4303 State Grants 13,740 0 0 74,000 74,000 N/A
SUBTOTAL 90,154 678 0 74,000 74,000 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT. W/in Special Dist 1,652,411 1,706,736 1,844,000 1,572,999 (271,001) (14.70%)
SUBTOTAL 1,652,411 1,706,736 1,844,000 1,572,999 (271,001) (14.70%)
TOTAL REVENUES 2,268,525 1,734,721 1,985,458 1,843,780 (141,678) (7.14%)
EXPENDITURES
Services and Supplies
6461 Supplies/Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
6522 District Services 600 1,000 0 0 0 N/A
6523 District Operations 1,571,910 1,058,000 1,058,000 925,000 (133,000) (12.57%)
6536 Business Environmental Allian< 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0.00%
6570 Consultant Services 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 N/A
6584 Trade Shows - So Cty Fair 0 0 20,000 20,000 0 0.00%
6630 Audit Svs . Review of prg 9,000 0 0 0 0 N/A
6800 Public Information 0 200,000 200,000 175,000 (25,000) (12.50%)
7206 Equipment Usage 22,307 0 0 0 0 N/A
7247 Water Conservation 1,837,184 650,000 255,000 299,000 44,000 17.25%
7250 Reimbursable Projects 118,669 0 0 0 0 N/A
7303 Private Car Expense 8,429 0 0 0 0 N/A
xxxx Payments to Other Gov 0 0 0 74,000 74,000 N/A
SUBTOTAL 3,568,099 1,959,000 1,583,000 1,573,000 (10,000) (0.63%)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,568,099 1,959,000 1,583,000 1,573,000 (10,000) (0.63%)
Outstanding Encumbrances 1,851,334
ENDING FUND BALANCE 574,756 350,477 621,257
A-41
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title:
Section/Index No:
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (165,410) 208,4 71 138,337
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY / PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 75,378 27,812 (711 ) 1,781 2,492 (350.49%)
SUBTOTAL 75,378 27,812 (711 ) 1,781 2,492 (350.49%)
InterQovernmental Revenue
2912 Town of Windsor 21,406 42,560 50,487 69,163 18,676 36,99%
SUBTOTAL 21 ,406 42,560 50,487 69,163 18,676 36,99%
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
4102 Donations/Reimbursements 90,000 200,258 200,258 125,000 (75,258) (37,58%)
SV GW Mgmt Plan, SR Plain GW Study & Mgmt Plan
SUBTOTAL 90,000 200,258 200,258 125,000 (75,258) (37,58%)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 419,179 663,044 726,250 1,077,499 351,249 48.36%
SUBTOTAL 419,179 663,044 726,250 1,077,499 351,249 48.36%
TOTAL REVENUES 605,963 933,674 976,284 1,273,443 297,159 30.44%
EXPENDITURES
Services and Supplies
6522 District Administration 2,462 0 0 0 0 N/A
6523 District Operations 105,500 428,808 428,808 430,000 1,192 0.28%
SV GW Mgmt Plan, SR Plain GW Study & Mgmt Plan
6570 Consultant Services 115,059 430,000 461,000 772,500 311,500 67,57%
SV GW Mgmt Plan, SR Plain GW Study & Mgmt Plan
6610 Legal Services 341 0 5,250 0 (5,250) (100.00%)
7206 Equipment Usage 481 0 0 0 0 N/A
7277 Recycled Water Use 1,011,289 145,000 0 0 0 N/A
7303 Private Car Expense 110 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 1,235,242 1,003,808 895,058 1,202,500 307,442 34.35%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,235,242 1,003,808 895,058 1,202,500 307,442 34.35%
Outstanding Encumbrances - Net Change 1,003,160
ENDING FUND BALANCE 208,471 138,337 209,281
A - 40
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title:
Section/Index No:
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (163,217) (573,224) (975,402)
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY / PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 830 (3,742) 3,570 (3,828) (7,398) (207,22%)
SUBTOTAL 830 (3,742) 3,570 (3,828) (7,398) (207.22%)
Interaovernmental Revenue
2912 Town of Windsor 19,826 112,000 132,840 112,000 (20,840) (15.69%)
SUBTOTAL 19,826 112,000 132,840 112,000 (20,840) (15.69%)
Miscellaneous Revenues
4102 Donations/Reimbursements - SR Plain Groundwater 159,442 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 159,442 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 317,483 1,744,854 1,910,900 1,744,854 (166,046) (8.69%)
SUBTOTAL 317,483 1,744,854 1,910,900 1,744,854 (166,046) (8,69%)
TOTAL REVENUES 497,581 1,853,112 2,047,310 1,853,026 (194,284) (9.49%)
EXPENDITURES
Services and Supplies
6522 District Services 5,858 0 0 0 0 N/A
6523 District Operations - RRIFR Program 259,466 1,312,200 1,445,900 1,065,610 (380,290) (26.30%)
6570 Consultant Services - RRIFR Program 418,510 943,090 465,000 701,025
6610 Legal Services 8,242 0 0 0
7206 Equipment Usage 2,368 0 0 0
7303 Private Car Expense 0 0 0 0
SUBTOTAL 694,444 2,255,290 1,910,900 1,766,635 (380,290) (19.90%)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 694,444 2,255,290 1,910,900 1,766,635 (380,290) (19.90%)
Outstanding Encumbrances. Net Change (213,144)
ENDING FUND BALANCE (573,224) (975,402) (889,011 )
A- 39
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: Iwater Management Planning
Sectionllndex No: 675710 I
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 248,309 345,560 1,000,892
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 6,309 3,752 5,288 10,159 4,871 92,11%
SUBTOTAL 6,309 3,752 5,288 10,159 4,871 92,11 %
InterQovernmental Revenue
2912 Town of Windsor 11,421 48,352 57,332 12,838 (44,494) (77.61%)
SUBTOTAL 11,421 48,352 57,332 12,838 (44,494) (77.61%)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 182,898 753,278 824,720 200,000 (624,720) (75,75%)
SUBTOTAL 182,898 753,278 824,720 200,000 (624,720) (75,75%)
TOTAL REVENUES 200,628 805,382 887,340 222,996 (664,344) (74.87%)
EXPENDITURES
Services and Supplies
6523 District OperationS-Urban Wtr Mgmt Plan 12,546 0 674,720 475,000 (199,720) (29.60%)
6570 Consultant SVS-Urban Wtr Mgmt Plan 2,944 50,000 50,000 350,000
6610 Legal Services 79,488 100,000 100,000 125,000
7303 Private Car Expense 6 50 0 0
SUBTOTAL 94,984 150,050 824,720 950,000 (199,720) (24.22%)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 94,984 150,050 824,720 950,000 (199,720) (24.22%)
Outstanding Encumbrances - Net Change (8,393)
ENDING FUND BALANCE 345,560 1,000,892 273,889
A - 38
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title:
Section/Index No:
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 1,655 123,162 124,422
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 38 1,260 2,476 1,250 (1,226) (4,9.50%)
1701 Interest Earned 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 38 1,260 2,476 1,250 (1 ,226) (49.50%)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 121,469 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 121,469 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL REVENUES 121,507 1,260 2,476 1,250 (1,226) (49.50%)
EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
o
o
N/A
o
o
o
ENDING FUND BALANCE
123,162
124,422
125,672
A - 37
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title:
Section/Index No:
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 4,635,510 5,502,806 5,221,349
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 106,768 57,868 101,873 55,893 (45,980) (45.13%)
1701 Interest Earned 0 675 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 106,768 58,543 101,873 55,893 (45,980) (45,13%)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 852,496 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 852,496 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL REVENUES 959,264 58,543 101,873 55,893 (45,980) (45.13%)
EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - Wlin Special Dist 91,968 340,000 340,000 0 (340,000) (100.00%)
SUBTOTAL 91,968 340,000 340,000 0 (340,000) (100.00%)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 91,968 340,000 340,000 0 (340,000) (100.00%)
ENDING FUND BALANCE 5,502,806 5,221,349 5,277 ,242
A- 35
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: Santa Rosa Aqueduct Capital Fund
Section/Index No: 675207
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 4,902,719 5,590,446 5,701,124
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 113,790 110,678 80,913 54,031 (26,882) (33.22%)
1701 Interest Earned 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 113,790 110,678 80,913 54,031 (26,882) (33.22%)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 573,937 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 573,937 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL REVENUES 687,727 110,678 80,913 54,031 (26,882) (33.22%)
EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist 0 0 325,000 870,000 545,000 167.69%
SUBTOTAL 0 0 325,000 870,000 545,000 167.69%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 325,000 870,000 545,000 167.69%
ENDING FUND BALANCE 5,590,446 5,701,124 4,885,156
A - 34
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: I North Marin Water Deposit
Section/Index No: 675512 I
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 11,910 12,285 12,461
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 375 176 217 125 (92) (42.29%)
SUBTOTAL 375 176 217 125 (92) (42.29%)
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 0 0 0 76,300 76,300 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 76,300 76,300 N/A
TOTAL REVENUES 375 176 217 76,425 76,208 35119.00%
EXPENDITURES
OTHER CHARGES
8010 Contribution Non-Co Govt 0 0 0 76,300 76,300 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 76,300 76,300 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 76,300 76,300 N/A
ENDING FUND BALANCE 12,285 12,461 12,586
A - 33
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
REVENUE BOND / STATE LOAN CHARGES - WATER RATES AND ESTIMATED REVENUES FOR FY 10-11
A. ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
Sonoma
Common Storage Pipeline
Facilities Facilities Facilities
2003 A Revenue Bond 675454 675462 675470
PRINCIPAL $160,759 $114,828 $94,414
INTEREST 268,270 191,622 157,556
FISCAL AGENT FEES 1,600 1,500 1,200
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS 3,951 2,822 2,320
DISCOUNT/BONDS 446 319 262
Total Individual Bond Payments 435,026 311,091 255,752
Bond Reserve 65,254 46,664 38,363
Total Individual Bond Debt Service 500,280 357,755 294,115
2006 A Revenue Bond 675496 675488
PRINCIPAL $108,483 $121,518
INTEREST 233,936 262,046
FISCAL AGENT FEES 2,300 2,500
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS 4,085 4,576
DISCOUNT/BONDS
Total Individual Bond Payments 348,804 390,640 0
Bond Reserve 52,321 58,596 0
Total Individual Bond Debt Service 401,125 449,236 0
1, 09/10 Financinn Exn for Common Fac incl above Mirabel TBD - Oakmont
until index established Generators Pipeline
PRINCIPAL 205,000
INTEREST 120,618
FISCAL AGENT FEES 0
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS 0
Total Individual Bond Payments 325,618 0 0
Reserve 16,281 0 0
Total Individual Financing Debt Service 341,899 0 0
SRFLOAN 675439
PRINCIPAL 635,758 N.A N.A
INTEREST 404,475 N.A N.A
USE OF SRF LOAN FUND BALANCE - 675439
Reserve Requirement 156,035
Total SRF Debt Service 1,196,268
SRF LOAN RESERVE 675447
RESERVE 119,627 N,A N.A
Total SRF Debt Service 1,315,895
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE $2,559,198 $806,991 $294,115
S REV. FROM N, MARIN REV. BOND CHARGES $317,069
REMAINING REVENUE REQUIREMENT $2,242,129 $806,991 $294,115
LES
B. CALCULATIONS OF WATER RATES FOR FY 10-11
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
APPLICABLE BASE WATER DELIVERIES IN AF.
CHARGES PER ACRE-FEET
Sonoma
Common Storage Pipeline
Facilities Facilities Facilities
Debt Service Revenue Bonds Revenue Bonds
Charae Charqe Charae
$2,242,129 $806,991 $294,115
35,198.8 35,198.8 4,168.8
$63.70 $22.93 $70.55
C. CALCULATIONS OF NORTH MARIN REVENUE BONDS CHARGE
REVENUE REQUIREMENT FOR COMMON FACILITIES DEBT SERVICE
N. MARIN'S SHARE (REV. REQMT. FOR COMMON FAC. DEBT SERVICE X (11.2/90.4))
ESTIMATED WATER DELIVERIES TO NORTH MARIN (IN AF.)
NORTH MARIN REVENUE BONDS CHARGE
2,559,198
317,069
7,376
43
Common Facilities
Total Debt Service 2,559,198
N. Marin's Share (11.2/90.4) 317,069
Estimated Water Deliveries to N, Marin 7,376.2
Applicable portion of the N, Marin R. Bonds Charge $42.99
A-32
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: ICapital Lease Financing
Sectionllndex No: 675371
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
IBEGINNING FUND BALANCE $0 $700,000 $0
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 0 7,156 0 0 0 N/A
1760 Investment Income 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 7,156 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 700,000 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 700,000 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL REVENUES 700,000 7,156 0 0 0 N/A
EXPENDITURES
OTHER CHARGES
7920 Interest - L T Debt 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist 0 707,156 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 707,156 0 0 0 N/A
ADMIN. CONTROL ACCOUNT
9200 Ent - Principal 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
9209 Ent - Principal Clearing 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 707,156 0 0 0 N/A
Principal Payment 0 0 0
lENDING FUND BALANCE $700,000 $0 $0
A - 30
2/25/20103:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: IState Loan Reserve Fund
Section/Index No: I 675447 I
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
IBEGINNING FUND BALANCE $0 $0 $0
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY 1 PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 13,896 7,692 0 0 0 N/A
1701 Interest Earned 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 13,896 7,692 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 119,641 119,628 119,628 119,627 (1 ) (0,00%)
SUBTOTAL 119,641 119,628 119,628 119,627 (1 ) (0,00%)
TOTAL REVENUES 133,537 127,320 119,628 119,627 (1 ) (0.00%)
EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - Wlin Special Dist 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Reserve Unavail. for Budgeting (133,537) (127,320) (119,627)
I ENDING FUND BALANCE $0 $0 $0
Fund Balance Components at Beainnina of ~ 7/1/08 II 7/1/09 I
Cash $598,191 $731,728
A - 31
2/25/20103:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: IState Loan Debt Service Fund
Section/Index No: 675439
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
IBEGINNING FUND BALANCE $3,604,938 ($35,923) $126,152
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 77,378 6,040 2,022 7,483 5,461 270,06%
1701 Interest Earned 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 77,378 6,040 2,022 7,483 5,461 270,06%
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 340,356 1,196,270 1,196,270 1,196,268 (2) (0.00%)
SUBTOTAL 340,356 1,196,270 1,196,270 1,196,268 (2) (0,00%)
TOTAL REVENUES 417,734 1,202,310 1,198,292 1,203,751 5,459 0.46%
EXPENDITURES
OTHER CHARGES
7930 Interest - L T Debt 438,782 421,880 421,880 404,475 (17,405) (4.13%)
SUBTOTAL 438,782 421,880 421,880 404,475 (17,405) (4.13%)
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist 2,400,000 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 2,400,000 0 0 0 0 N/A
ADMIN. CONTROL ACCOUNT
9200 Ent - Principal 601,450 618,355 618,355 635,758 17,403 2,81%
9209 Ent - Principal Clearing (601,450) (618,355) (618,355) (635,758) (17,403) 2.81%
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,838,782 421,880 421,880 404,475 (17,405) (4.13%)
Principal Payment (601,450) (618,355) (635,758)
Change in Due to Other Gov (618,363)
ENDING FUND BALANCE ($35,923) $126,152 $289,670
A -30
2/25/20103:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: ICommon Facilities Revenue Bonds 2006
Sectionllndex No: 675496
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
IBEG. FUND BALANCE $201,442 $185,576 $80,840
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY 1 PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 3,604 1,936 37 4,928 4,891 13218,16%
1701 Interest Earned 2,659 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 6,263 1,936 37 4,928 4,891 13218.16%
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL
4200 Long Term Debt Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
4209 Long Term Debt Clearing 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 404,725 400,482 1,187,354 401,125 (786,229) (66,22%)
SUBTOTAL 404,725 400,482 1,187,354 401,125 (786,229) (66.22%)
TOTAL REVENUES 410,988 402,418 1,187,391 406,052 (781,339) (65.80%)
EXPENDITURES
SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
6635 Fiscal Agent Fees 1,806 3,300 3,300 2,300 (1,000) (30,30%)
6640 Debt Insurance Costs 4,085 5,085 5,085 4,085 (1,000) (19,67%)
SUBTOTAL 5,891 8,385 8,385 6,385 (2,000) (23.85%)
OTHER CHARGES
7920 Interest 242,141 238,000 398,179 233,936 (164,243) (41,25%)
7922 Premium-Call Bonds (1,984) 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 240,157 238,000 398,179 233,936 (164,243) (41,25%)
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist 81,500 160,100 160,100 0 (160,100) (100,00%)
SUBTOTAL 81,500 160,100 160,100 0 (160,100) (100.00%)
ADMIN. CONTROL ACCOUNT
9200 Ent - Principal 101,407 103,770 625,917 108,483 (517,434) (82.67%)
9209 Ent - Principal Clearing (101,407) (103,770) (625,917) (108,483) 517,434 (82,67%)
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 327,548 406,485 566,664 240,321 (326,343) (57.59%)
Cost of Issuance 0 0 0
Restricted Cash w/Fiscal Agent 0 0 0
Increase in Bonds Payable 0 0 0
Amort of Bond Premium (1,984) (1,984) 0
Amort. of Bond Issuance Costs 4,085 5,085 4,085
Long Term Debt Proceeds 0 0 0
Principal Payment (101,407) (103,770) (108,483)
Post-Audit Adjustment - Closing
COI Funds 0 0 0
ENDING FUND BALANCE $185,576 $80,840 $142,173
A- 29
2/25/20103:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: ICommon Facilities Revenue Bonds - 2003 A
Sectionllndex No: 675454
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEG. FUND BALANCE $234,441 $220,687 $223,039
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY 1 PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 4,117 2,368 1 3,290 3,289 328908,00%
1701 Interest Earned 9,224 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 13,341 2,368 1 3,290 3,289 328908,00%
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL
4200 Long Term Debt Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
4209 Long Term Debt Clearing 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 499,339 498,999 498,999 500,280 1,281 0.26%
SUBTOTAL 499,339 498,999 498,999 500,280 1,281 0,26%
TOTAL REVENUES 512,680 501,367 499,000 503,570 4,570 0.92%
EXPENDITURES
SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
6635 Fiscal Agent Fees 1,223 1,600 1,600 1,600 0 0,00%
6640 Debt Insurance Costs 3,950 3,951 3,951 3,951 0 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 5,173 5,551 5,551 5,551 0 0.00%
OTHER CHARGES
7920 Interest 278,314 273,670 273,670 268,270 (5,400) (1.97%)
7923 Discount 1 Bonds 446 446 446 446 0 0,00%
SUBTOTAL 278,760 274,116 274,116 268,716 (5,400) (1.97%)
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - Wlin Special Dist 97,000 69,500 69,500 0 (69,500) (100,00%)
SUBTOTAL 97,000 69,500 69,500 0 (69,500) (100.00%)
ADMIN. CONTROL ACCOUNT
9200 Ent - Principal 149,897 154,245 154,245 160,759 6,514 4.22%
9209 Ent - Principal Clearing (149,897) (154,245) (154,245) (160,759) (6,514) 4,22%
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 380,933 349,167 349,167 274,267 (74,900) (21.45%)
Increase in Bonds Payable 0 0 0
Amort, of Bond Issuance Costs 4,396 4,397 4,397
Long Term Debt Proceeds
Principal Pa ment (149,897) (154,245) (160,759)
ENDING FUND BALANCE $220,687 $223,039 $295,980
A - 28
2/25/20103:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
Common Facilities - Section 675421
Detailed Listing of Capital Projects
Project &
SUB-OBJECT DESCRIPTION Subobiect FY 2010-11 BUDGET
8528 Mirabel Generator
DESCRIPTION
Mirabel Generator TSD 350,000
8528 Total 350,000
8529 Isolation Valves and Meters
DESCRIPTION
Isolation Valves 7379 50,000
8529 Total 50,000
8552 Forestville Storage Tank
DESCRIPTION
Forestville Storage Tank 7255 103,500
8552 Total 103,500
9105 Mirabel Fish Screen Replacement
DESCRIPTION
Fish Screen Replacement 7357 1,000,000
9105 Total 1,000,000
9107 Air Valves
DESCRIPTION
Air Valves 7429 150,000
9107 Total 150,000
9113 Wohler Site Improvement
DESCRIPTION
Wohler HazMat Storage Facility TSD 0
Decommision Wohler Ponds 7358 200,000
9113 Total 200,000
9128 Local Hazard Mitigation Projects
DESCRIPTION
Collector 3 and 5 Liquefaction Mitigation TSD 350,000
9128 Total 3!i0,OQO
Total Common Facilities
$
2,203,500
A- 27
2/25/20103:21 PM
Section Title: ICommon Facilities
Sectionllndex No: 675421
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
9175 Wohler Mirabel 12KV 1,370,156 22,000 0 0 0 N/A
9176 Mirabel- Cotati Pipeline 151 100 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 6,843,885 2,393,100 1,572,100 2,203,500 631,400 40,16%
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - Wlin Special Dist 56,349 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 56,349 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,119,846 2,393,100 1,572,100 2,203,500 631,400 40.16%
Loan 0 0 0
Outstanding Encumbrances - Net Change 1,016,930 0 0
Capitalized Interest (811,023) 0 0
Proceeds from State Loan & Other L T Debt (1,694) 0 0
Change in Deposit with Others 0 0 0
PY CIP Adjustment - Reclass to PY Exp 26,613
ENDING FUND BALANCE (2,469,302) (1,588,259) (1,283,461 )
A - 26
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: ICommon Facilities
Section/Index No: 675421
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 811,701 (2,469,302) ( 1,588,259)
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 29,517 (21,856) 23,246 (37,101) (60,347) (259,60%)
SUBTOTAL 29,517 (21,856) 23,246 (37,101) (60,347) (259.60%)
Charqes for Services
3980 Revenue Apply to PY 0 271 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 271 0 0 0 N/A
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL
4200 ENT - L TD Proceeds 743,067 0 3,000,000 0 (3,000,000) (100,00%)
4209 ENT - L TD Proc, Clearing (743,067) 0 (3,000,000) 0 3,000,000 (100.00%)
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - Wlin Special Dist 2,578,500 3,295,728 1,801,700 2,545,399 743,699 41.28%
SUBTOTAL 2,578,500 3,295,728 1,801,700 2,545,399 743,699 41.28%
TOTAL REVENUES 2,608,017 3,274,143 1,824,946 2,508,298 683,352 37.45%
EXPENDITURES
Services and Supplies
6522 Dist Services 3,011 0 0 0 0 N/A
7206 Equipment Usage 1,012 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 4,023 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER CHARGES
7480 Exp Applicable to Prior Year 26,612 0 0 0 0 N/A
7924 Capital Interest (811,023) 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL (784,411 ) 0 0 0 0 N/A
FIXED ASSETS
8528 Mirabel Generator 3,071,747 190,000 0 350,000 350,000 N/A
8529 Isolation Valves & Meters 484 6,000 0 50,000 50,000 N/A
8552 Forestville Storage Tank 1,14 (c) and (d; 611 0 0 103,500 103,500 N/A
9105 Mirabel Fish Screen Replacement 53,406 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 800,000 400,00%:
9107 Air Valves 895,043 235,000 235,000 150,000 (85,000) (36.17%)
9113 Wohler Site Improvement 736,784 85,000 57,100 200,000 142,900 250.26%
9128 Local Hazard Mitigation 28,393 30,000 250,000 350,000 100,000 40.00%
9130 Trans System Exp - Water Project EIR,
Dry Creek Feasibility Study, Mirabel/Cotati
Feasibility Study, Flow EIR, Spring Lake
Groundwater, Phase 1112 kv Project 574,571 175,000 0 0 0 N/A
9152 Pump & Collector Capacity 112,539 1 ,450,000 830,000 0 (830,000) (100,00%)
A - 25
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: ISonoma Aqueduct Revenue Bonds
Section/Index No: 675470
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $328,158 $381,735 $426,638
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
. 1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 6,857 4,056 7,004 4,494 (2,510) (35.84%)
1701 Interest Earned 5,418 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 12,275 4,056 7,004 4,494 (2,510) (35,84%)
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL
4200 Long Term Debt Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
4209 Long Term Debt Clearing 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 293,564 293,367 293,367 294,115 748 0.25%
SUBTOTAL 293,564 293,367 293,367 294,115 748 0.25%
TOTAL REVENUES 305,839 297,423 300,371 298,608 (1,763) (0.59%)
EXPENDITURES
SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
6635 Fiscal Agent Fees 774 1,200 1,200 1,200 0 0.00%
6640 Debt Insurance Costs 2,320 2,320 2,320 2,320 0 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 3,094 3,520 3,520 3,520 0 0,00%
OTHER CHARGES
7920 Interest 163,454 160,730 160,730 157,556 (3,174) (1.97%)
7923 Discount I Bonds 262 262 262 262 0 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 163,716 160,992 160,992 157,818 (3,174) (1,97%)
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
ADMIN. CONTROL ACCOUNT
9200 Ent - Principal 88,034 90,590 90,590 94,414 3,824 4.22%
9209 Ent - Principal Clearing (88,034) (90,590) (90,590) (94,414) (3,824) 4.22%
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 166,810 164,512 164,512 161,338 (3,174) (1.93%)
Increase in Bonds Payable 0 0
Amort, of Bond Issuance Costs 2,582 2,582 2,582
Principal Payments on Bonds (88,034) (90,590) (94,414)
ENDING FUND BALANCE $381,735 $426,638 $472,076
A-24
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: I Pipeline Facilities
Section/Index No: 675413
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 4,698 1,030,634 714,311
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY / PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 24,623 8,677 566 7,158 6,592 1164.58%
SUBTOTAL 24,623 8,677 566 7,158 6,592 1164.58%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
2852 Federal Grants 0 0 0 1 ,500,000 1,500,000 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 1,500,000 1,500,000 N/A
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
3980 Revenue Apply to PY 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
4102 Donations/Reimbursements 10,650 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 10,650 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist - Transfer from Santa Rosa Aqueduct
Fund 675207 $325,000 and from the Petaluma Aqueduct Fund
675215 $340,000 148,317 340,000 665,000 870,000 205,000 30.83%
SUBTOTAL 148,317 340,000 665,000 870,000 205,000 30,83%
TOTAL REVENUES 183,590 348,677 665,566 2,377,158 1,711,592 257.16%
EXPENDITURES
FIXED ASSETS
9106 Santa Rosa Aqueduct Sections 2 & 3 534 325,000 325,000 370,000 45,000 13.85%
9115 Wohler Santa Rosa Pipeline 530 0 0 0 0 N/A
9128 Local Hazard Mitigation 0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 N/A
9154 Petaluma Aqueduct 2,772 340,000 340,000 300,000 (40,000) (11,76%)
XXXX Sonoma Pipeline 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 N/A
9163 Eldridge-Madrone Pipeline 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
9174 South Trans, Syst. Pipeline 170,754 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 174,590 665,000 665,000 2,720,000 2,055,000 309.02%
OTHER CHARGES
7924 Interest - Prior Year (102,416) 0 0 0 0 N/A
(102,416) 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 72,174 665,000 665,000 2,720,000 2,055,000 309,02%
Outstanding Encumbrances - Net Change 1,016,936 0
Capitalized Interest (102,416) 0
ENDING FUND BALANCE 1,030,634 714,311 371,468
A- 23
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: IStorage Facilities Revenue Bonds 2006
Section/Index No: 675488
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $1,050,019 $1,065,073 $478,778
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 23,210 5,626 12,864 2,868 (9,996) (77.71%)
1701 Interest Earned 2,979 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 26,189 5,626 12,864 2,868 (9,996) (77.71%)
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL
4200 Long Term Debt Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
4209 Long Term Debt Clearing 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 450,693 448,514 448,514 449,236 722 0.16%
SUBTOTAL 450,693 448,514 448,514 449,236 722 0,16%
TOTAL REVENUES 476,882 454,140 461,378 452,104 (9,274) (2.01%)
EXPENDITURES
SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
6635 Fiscal Agent Fees 1,998 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 0.00%
6640 Debt Insurance Costs 4,575 4,576 4,576 4,576 0 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 6,573 7,076 7,076 7,076 0 0.00%
OTHER CHARGES
7920 Interest 271,237 266,700 266,700 262,046 (4,654) (1.75%)
7922 Premium-Call Bonds (2,222) 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 269,015 266,700 266,700 262,046 (4,654) (1.75%)
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist 75,000 655,000 880,000 225,000 (655,000) (74.43%)
SUBTOTAL 75,000 655,000 880,000 225,000 (655,000) (74.43%)
ADMIN. CONTROL ACCOUNT
9200 Ent - Principal 113,593 116,235 116,235 121,518 5,283 4.55%
9209 Ent - Principal Clearing (113,593) (116,235) (116,235) (121,518) (5,283) 4.55%
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 350,588 928,776 1,153,776 494,122 (659,654) (57.17%)
Cost of Issuance 0 0
Restricted Cash w/Fiscal Agent 0 0
Increase in Bonds Payable 0 0 0
Amort of Bond Premium 0 0 0
Amort, of Bond Issuance Costs 2,353 4,576 4,576
Long Term Debt Proceeds 0 0 0
Principal Payment (113,593) (116,235) (121,518)
Post-Audit Adjustment - Closing
COI Funds 0 0
ENDING FUND BALANCE $1,065,073 $478,778 $319,818
A - 22
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: IStorage Facilities Revenue Bond - 2003A
Section/Index No: 675462
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $167,014 $212,896 $182,861
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 2,949 2,280 284 2,912 2,628 925.42%
1701 Interest Earned 6,588 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 9,537 2,280 284 2,912 2,628 925.42%
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL
4200 Long Term Debt Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
4209 Long Term Debt Clearing 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 357,082 356,840 356,840 357,755 915 0.26%
SUBTOTAL 357,082 356,840 356,840 357,755 915 0.26%
TOTAL REVENUES 366,619 359,120 357,124 360,667 3,543 0.99%
EXPENDITURES
SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
6635 Fiscal Agent Fees 911 1,500 1,500 1,500 0 0,00%
6640 Debt Insurance Costs 2,822 2,822 2,822 2,822 0 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 3,733 4,322 4,322 4,322 0 0.00%
OTHER CHARGES
7920 Interest 198,796 195,480 195,480 191,622 (3,858) (1,97%)
7923 Discount I Bonds 318 319 319 319 0 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 199,114 195,799 195,799 191 ,941 (3,858) (1.97%)
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - Wlin Special Dist 13,961 82,000 82,000 0 (82,000) (100.00%)
SUBTOTAL 13,961 82,000 82,000 0 (82,000) (100.00%)
ADMIN. CONTROL ACCOUNT
9200 Ent - Principal 107,069 110,175 110,175 114,828 4,653 4.22%
9209 Ent - Principal Clearing (107,069) (110,175) (110,175) (114,828) (4,653) 4.22%
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 216,808 282,121 282,121 196,263 (85,858) (30.43%)
Increase in Bonds Payable 0 0 0
Amort. of Bond Issuance Costs 3,140 3,141 3,141
Long Term Debt Proceeds
Principal Pa ment 107,069) 110,175) (114,828)
ENDING FUND BALANCE $212,896 $182,861 $235,578
A - 21
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: IStorage Facilities
Sectionllndex No: 675405
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009.10 2009.10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 642,787 731,732 718,929
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 15,338 6,197 678 14,823 14,145 2086.34%
4102 Donations/Reimbursements 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 15,338 6,197 678 14,823 14,145 2086.34%
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist 88,961 737,000 962,000 648,700 (313,300) (32,57%)
SUBTOTAL 88,961 737,000 962,000 648,700 (313,300) (32.57%)
TOTAL REVENUES 104,299 743,197 962,678 663,523 (299,155) (31.08%)
EXPENDITURES
OTHER CHARGES
7930 Interest - L.T. Debt (4,425) 0 0 0 0 N/A
FIXED ASSETS
9154 Petaluma Aque Relocation 0 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 N/A
9162 Kawana to Ralphine Tanks 2,418 26,000 225,000 225,000 0 0,00%
9168 Kawana Springs Tank # 2 12,906 10,000 0 0 0 N/A
9171 Oakmont Pipeline 30' 720,000 720,000 0 (720,000) (100,00%)
SUBTOTAL 15,354 756,000 945,000 1,425,000 480,000 50.79%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,929 756,000 945,000 1,425,000 480,000 50.79%
Outstanding Encumbrances - Net C 0 0
Long Term Debt proceeds 0 0
Capitalized Interest (4,425) 0 0
ENDING FUND BALANCE 731,732 718,929 (42,548)
A -20
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
Water Transmission System Agency Fund
Local Supplv I Recvcled Water I Tier 2 ProQrams
Balance as of November 12.2009
10-Year Amount Amount Balance
Contractor Allocation Approved Disbursed Available
City of Rohnert Park $649,629 $649,629 $0 649,629
City of Petaluma 2,197,913 2,197,913 2,197,913 0
Valley of the Moon 627,875 627,875 627,875 0
North Marin Water District 1,846,726 1,846,726 1,846,726 0
City of Cotati 157,235 0 0 157,235
City of Santa Rosa 5,065,236 4,003,876 2,048,639 3,016,597
Forestville Water District 104,953 104,953 104,953 0
City of Sonoma 539,411 539,411 174,843 364,568
Marin Municipal WD 1,724,026 1,000,000 1,000,000 724,026
Town of Windsor 86,996 86,996 86,996 0
TOTAL $13,000,000 $11,057,379 $8,087,945 $4,912,055
Program started June 30, 2000 - No end date specified.
A - 19
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
co
<=>
...-
It)
,...
l.O
~ ==
- Ql
"t:l ._
C>I-
::lQlw
u.ll::C)
>'+"o
u~:::>
a;:cco
~~...-
t:: ~ ';
.2 lJ) ~
(filii<=>
(fIQlN
'E >;- >-
(fI:;:;u.
c:;
l:!:iE
I-
...
.s
III
s:
ill
.go
::J
<0 >-
LL
Q) 0
ro
E ~
't; >-
W LL
Iii lJ)
::J f2
13 ro
<{ 0
>-
LL
Iii ro
::J 0
u j.::::
<{ 0
>-
LL
Iii "-
::J 0
13 CD
<{ 0
>-
LL
Iii '"
::J f2
13 '"
<{ 0
>-
LL
Iii '"
::J 0
o ~
<{ 0
>-
LL
ill
.0
E
::J
Z
13
Q)
:0
o
.0
::J
(f)
~
i=
Q) Q)
U U
o ~ ~
Q) C C
:0 (j) ill
o C C
-g 'm 'm
(f) ::;; ::;;
aoooo,*,
DODDer--..
oo~oooco
~~~(j)hgg~
m m (0 "d'
ON
....
ooooo~
OOOOOlO
oo~oooO)
o-om-oa)~
lJ1 0 D LI)
0_ 0_ co co
0- N
....
.,.
.q-omC")CD~
~~h(OOMC\J
~-~(J)-~-~,?
('J) -q- co C\I
o ('l-
....
.,.
NNf'-.. cor..... '*
~~~~~~
<0- a cci mh "d'"' <ri
MOO COoe-
D_ 00_ l() Lt)
ci M"
....
.,.
~~~;~g;
COCDCO"lt<D
r::-~f.:j-gf8'7
1"-_ m_ I'-- ~ CD
lO- C'? N"'
....
.,.
COLOVDt--.'*
M <D l() Lt) C\J
l() co co C\I co
-.;;f -.;t- N- N ~
~ v ~ "d'
~- l[)- ~
....
.,.
l{) N M 0 oc-
o f'-.. f'-.. lI)
~-~(O- ~
N~;: ~
CD <0- C'\I"'
....
.,.
o 0 N M
V co N N rJ)
<O<D~~'~l...
o '"
O'l ~
Gl ...
... 0
ns 'i:::
U Q
EO
.g
Q)
'"
t::
'"
-t::
o
Q)
'"
~
t::
III
~
III
Q
c
Q) CL
E E
.~ ~
rr "0
W in
...
'"
o
C U
o ...
~ ~ ::;,
en 0 ~
'c ~ Q)
~ Q} :S
~ ~ 1;
~ ~ :e
o 0 {!.
.,.
~
o
(f)
Q)
ro
(5
.!!1
Be.-)
~~
UJ'"
UJ"O
Q) C
U '"
e '
CLg
UJ~
~ "',
~~
fij<<J
.<: UJ
U13
Ollll
c:C
+=- 0
C.o
::J ::J
8 '"
U C
ro:.c
fijj
r-----g
f2"O
'" ::J
0'0
>- .~
LL Q)
m ~
0'",
:2Ui
E 8
C ~
- 0
. .0
~~
"'<{
gs
~g
o of
.0 Ol
.!!! ~
~'5
o g>
(f)'E
o ::J
:;: 8
Q) U
';;: co
~ '"
:;:E
..Q.8
Iii ~
o ,Q
:;0:
Q) .
C '"
~~
0_
U U
l!?~
'" 0
"'.0
~ ~
E.8
E~
::J '"
'" 0
Q) U
~ 0
.<:.0
f-.'J!
ill
Ol_
"0 0
::J
<0 >-
LL
c *'
o "-
C!. <0
o N
~ ,.
<F>
Q) 0
ro
.~ ~
U; >-
W LL
o *'
o co
o C\J
g ~
It).
<F>
Iii lJ)
::J 0
13 ro
<{ 0
>-
LL
co *'
~ 0')
o ~
~ C\J
<F>
Iii co
::J 0
o j.::::
<{ 0
>-
LL
M *'
'" "-
It) "-
~... C\j
...
<F>
Iii "-
::J 0
u <D
<{ 0
>-
LL
M: '*
... '"
'" 0')
M r-...:
'"
<J)
<F>
Iii '"
::J f2
13 '"
<{ 0
>-
LL
N '*
... <0
<J) <0
o ~
'" ~
It)
<F>
co l{) U)
::J 0 '"
t5 ~ m
<( 0 00'"
>- N
LL It)
<F>
ill
.0
E
::J
Z
o
"-
'"
'"
13
Q)
:0
o
.0
::J
(f)
...
'"
~
...
o
't::
Q
EO
.g
III
Q) '"
() C
';;: '"
~ (f)Q) <3
i=
o 0} 8,
III ~ J2
E -S c:
o '" Q)
.0 C ~
::J 0 III
(f) U Q
Q) 0 000 0 a
-8'0 g 8_8 ~~tg g
~>=~f~g~~~f~7f
LL
co
'"
;:: ~
CI)
Q)
U
.~
Q,) en 0'
CJ) Q) W
tn ~ ;.s
.5 co ID Q)
~ LL"O 10
~ ~ 6 ~ s
o 0 '00 "0
U E mill(/) s
c N>~OJO
l;; ili ~ "0 f5> ~
co ~:::):E'5c5(/)
.E UQ 0 Q)
~ z ~ ~ 8 ~ m ~
~ ~ I i ~ ~ U5 .~
,~u~U~1J ~
E: (f) ::;; 2! (9 ~ '0,
~ ~ E9 ~ ~ &5 Jj
-'"
Q)
Q)
U
i':'
..E..
0;
C
:;;:
C
'"
<0
o
o
o
o
C\J
'"
13
Q)
B
Ci
Iii
E
(f)
'"
::J
o
Q)
C
.'J!
Qi
U
'"
~
o
o
o
o'
<J)
co
<F>
iO
'0
I-
o
...
It)
<J)
ill
-8>0
::J
<0 >-
LL
o '*-
o a
o a
g l!j
N
III
<F>
Q) 0 0 '*-
10 0 (Q
.S~ci::
en r 0
w LL 0
III
<F>
Iii m
::J 0
t) co
<{ 0
>-
LL
...... '*
co a
N '"
co" to
N ~
'" ,
'<t-
<F>
Iii co
::J 0
t5 ~
<{ 0
>-
LL
M '*
~ "-
M ~
0" M
~ co
III
<F>
Iii "-
::J 0
t5 ID
<{ 0
>-
LL
l/) '$.
<J) C\J
It) a
........ lri
'" ~
N
M
<F>
Iii '"
::J f2
13 '"
<{ 0
>-
LL
(,0 *-
co ll)
... <0
..;- C\j
ro lf?
N
<F>
ro LO lI)
::J 0 ...
t5 ~ M
<{ ~ :f
LL '"
III
<F>
ill
.0
E
::J
Z
"
m
M
"-
13
Q)
:0
o
.0
::J
(f)
...
'"
~
...
Q
6:
EO
~ .g
Q) III
':; t1.l
Q) t::
Q) a: ~
+=- Q) ()
i= Cl Q)
t5 m Ol
ill ::l .!!:!
E ill a3
..8 3: e
::J 0 Q)
(f) n. Q
::;;
n.
C\J
M
o
~
o
C\J
<0
N
N
"-
<{
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
Water Transmission System Agency Fund
DESCRIPTION PROJECT # AMOUNT
6180 - Maintenance I BuildinQs
1 Kawana Booster Pump Mechanical Seal 65,000
2 Mirabel - Transformer Covers (Caissons 3, 4, & 5) 30,000
3 Mirabel - Potable Water Line 7092 150,000
4 Petaluma Aqueduct 24" Mainline Valve 100,000
5 Pond Flow Monitoring Instruments 7002 75,000
6 Wilford Booster Motor & Switch Upgrade 75,000
7 Wohler & Mirabel - Turbidimeters 100,000
8 Wohler & Mirabel - Fuel Storage Sump 40,000
9 Wohler Caustic Pump Spare 20,000
10 Miscellaneous Small Expenses 250,000
11
12
13
6180 Total $ 905,000
A - 16
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
Water Transmission System Aqency Fund
Maior Services & Supplies Expenditure Items
Sub-Object No. and Title
Actual Adopted
FY 08-09 FY 09 -10
Requested
FY 10-11
Difference
Percent
Change
6140 Maintenance - Equipment
927,294 1,072,481
976,000
(96,481)
-9,0%
Decreased budget in 6140 due to lower expected expenses
6180 Maintenance - Proiects 495,840 950,000 905,000 (45,000)
See project list on page A-16 for detail. Budget decreased due to prioritization of project list.
-4,7%
6280 Memberships 70,764 85,000 75,000
Lower Agency revenue in past year is expected to lower membership fees,
(10,000)
-11.8%
76,751
56,641
80,000
23,359
41,2%
6512 Testinq / Analysis 118,399 147,438 210,000
Anticipated additional testing and increased costs for water quality monitoring
62,562
42.4%
6523 District Operations
10,820,013
9,627,665
10,600,000
972,335
10.1%
Reflects an increase due to resuming normal operation and maintenance of facilities, See A-17.
6570 Consultant Services 860,688 826,245
See Consultant SeNices Project List for detail on page A-17,
860,000
33,755
4,1%
6610 Leqal Services 33,842 52,500 50,000
Increased budgelto reflect anticipated expenditures from recent legal procedings.
(2,500)
-4.8%
7206 Equipment Usaqe Charqe
650,261
500,000
500,000
o
0.0%
7212 Chlorine Chemical/Recorder
1,381,622
1,157,329
1,100,000
(57,329)
-5,0%
7394 Power
Reflects level of actual expenditures,
4,928,287
5,812,419
5,250,000
(562,419)
-9.7%
A -15
2/25/20103:21 PM
SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
WHOLESALE WA TER CHARGE COMPARISONS
(Water Companies and Public Agencies)
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2010-11
CHARGE PER
FISCAL YEAR ACRE FOOT
1988-89 $259,04
1989-90 264,17
1990-91 277.24
1991-92 268.21
1992-93 318.08
1993-94 310.40
1994-95 318.45
1995-96 327.14
1996-97 327.00
1997 -98 340.17
1998-99 331.04
1999-00 373,31
2000-01 397.93
2001-02 460.82
2002-03 477.48
2003-04 496,67
2004-05 507.01
2005-06 519,22
2006-07 541.55
2007-08 554.04
2008-09 613.35
2009-10 746.54
2010-11 820.96
A -10
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
Section Title:
Section/Index No:
IWater Transmission System Agency Fund
675108
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
Depreciation 4,948,749 5,148,946 5,400,000
Outstanding Encumbrances - (Decrease) Fund Balance (158,410) 0 0
PY Encumbrances 0 0 0
Change in Prudent Reserve 1,028,831 0 0
Post Audit Adjustments-Payables (200,000) 0 0
Post Audit Adjustments-Receivables 65,391 0 0
Post Audit Adjustments-Inventory 0 0 0
Post Audit Adjustments-Prepaid Expense 0 0 0
Increase in Recycled/Conservation Deposits 0 0 0
Capitalized Interest 0 0 0
Gain/Loss of Disposal of Fixed Asset 179,346 0 0
Reclass of Prior Year Asset 0 0 0
ENDING FUND BALANCE 7,320,789 4,927,824 5,285,120
Operations and Maintenance 675108 Fund Balance Reserve Goal 6,056,280
Over/(Under) Goal (771,159)
A - 13
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
Section Title: IWater Transmission System Agency Fund
Section/Index No: 675108
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
EXPENDITURES
SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
6040 Communications 59,985 60,000 57,135 60,000 2,865 5.01%
6140 Maintenance - Equipment 927,294 1,050,000 1,072,481 976,000 (96,481) (9,00%)
6180 Maintenance - Buildings 495,840 1,000,000 950,000 905,000 (45,000) (4.74%)
6262 Laboratory Supplies 15,917 30,000 27,412 30,000 2,588 9.44%
6280 Memberships 70,764 75,000 85,000 75,000 (10,000) (11,76%)
6410 Postage 59 1,000 2,750 1,000 (1,750) (63.64%)
6461 Supplies / Expenses 76,751 80,000 56,641 80,000 23,359 41.24%
6512 Testing / Analysis 118,399 220,149 147,438 210,000 62,562 42.43%
6522 District Services 9,169 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0,00%
6523 District Operations 10,820,013 10,800,000 9,627,665 10,600,000 972,335 10.10%
6553 Contract-Security Services 16,230 50,000 25,000 50,000 25,000 100,00%
6570 Consultant Services 860,688 1,500,000 826,245 860,000 33,755 4.09%
6610 Legal Services 33,842 300,000 52,500 50,000 (2,500) (4.76%)
6800 Public/Legal Notices 10,394 10,000 5,000 10,000 5,000 100,00%
6820 Rents and Leases-Equip 68,602 70,000 54,992 70,000 15,008 27.29%
6880 Small Tools - Instruments 73,982 75,000 23,508 75,000 51 ,492 219,04%
6889 Software 5,029 25,000 50,000 25,000 (25,000) (50,00%)
7201 Gas / Oil 5,146 5.000 5,000 5,000 0 0.00%
7206 Equipment Usage Charge 650,261 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 0,00%
7212 Chlorine Chem/Recorder 1,381,622 1,100,000 1,157,329 1,100,000 (57,329) (4,95%)
7217 State Permits / Fees 24,262 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 0,00%
7250 Reimbursable Projects 3,046 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.00%
7296 FERC Fees / Costs 1,919 5,000 9,000 5,000 (4,000) (44.44%)
7297 Riverfront Park Levee Maintenance 32,031 100,000 90,000 100,000 10,000 11.11%
7302 Travel Expense 17,639 20,000 15,000 20,000 5,000 33,33%
7303 Private Car Expense 2,239 2,500 5,000 2,500 (2,500) (50.00%)
7320 Utilities 1,035 2,500 4,120 2,500 (1,620) (39,32%)
7394 Power 4,928,287 5,000,000 5,812,419 5,250,000 (562,419) (9.68%)
SUBTOTAL 20,710,445 22,130,149 20,710,635 21,111,000 400,365 1,93%
OTHER CHARGES
7920 Interest Expense 0 0 0 120,618 120,618 N/A
7980 Depreciation 4,948,749 5,148,946 5,261,301 5,400,000 138,699 2,64%
8090 Loss on Fixed Assets 179,346 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 5,128,095 5,148,946 5,261,301 5,520,618 259,317 4.93%
FIXED ASSETS
8510 Buildings /Improvements 0 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 N/A
8533 SCWA-New Metered Ser 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 0,00%
8560 Equipment 77,550 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 N/A
SUBTOTAL 77,550 150,000 20,000 150,000 130,000 650.00%
Note: Adopted budget column includes mid-year budgetary adjustments
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist 7,285,275 10,540,984 10,978,942 10,959,156 (19,786) (0,18%)
SUBTOTAL 7,285,275 10,540,984 10,978,942 10,959,156 (19,786) (0.18%)
APPROP. FOR CONTINGENCIES
9000 Approp. for Contingencies 0 140,000 140,000 140,000 0 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 0 140,000 140,000 140,000 0 0,00%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 33,201,365 38,110,079 37,110,878 37,880,774 769,896 2.07%
A - 12
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
BEGINNING AND ENDING CASH SUMMARY
Section Title: IWater Transmission System Agency Fund
Section/Index No: 675108
Actual Estimated Adopted Requested Percent
Subobject Title 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
BEGINNNG FUND BALANCE 5,634,962 7,320,789 4,927,824
REVENUES
USE OF MONEY I PROPERTY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash 223,819 112,229 86,627 63,680 (22,947) (26.49%)
1701 Interest Earned 0 2,000 0 0 0 N/A
1800 Rents IConcessions 450 0 0 0 0 N/A
1801 Rent - Real Estate 1 1,395 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 224,270 115,624 86,627 63,680 (22,947) (26.49%)
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
2400 State - Disaster Relief 0 145,568 0 0 0 N/A
2680 Federal - Disaster Relief 0 882,325 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 0 1,027,893 0 0 0 N/A
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
3666 Meter Service I Install 30,701 15,935 20,000 20,000 0 0.00%
3980 Revenue Applicable to PY 3,476 4,217 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 34,177 20,152 20,000 20,000 0 0.00%
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
4039 Sale - Power 1,049.974 1,200,000 1,300,000 875,000 (425,000) (32.69%)
4040 Miscellaneous Revenues 1,752 0 0 0 0 N/A
4102 Donationsl Reimb. 8 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0,00%
4109 Outdated Warrants 1,237 0 0 0 0 N/A
4161 Water Sales - O&M 19,366,538 19,543,857 23,006,836 23,613,735 606,899 2.64%
4162 Comm. Rev, Bd, Charge 1,672,022 2,140,510 2,479,916 2,242,129 (237,787) (9,59%)
4163 Storage Rev. Bd, Charge 709,914 695,269 805.353 806,991 1,638 0.20%
4164 Sonoma Aq. Rev, Charge 726,381 249,210 293,367 294,115 748 0.25%
4166 SR Aq, Capital Charge 573,937 0 0 0 0 N/A
4167 Petaluma Aq, Cap. Chg. 852,497 0 0 0 0 N/A
4168 Sonoma Aq. Cap, Charge 121,469 0 0 0 0 N/A
4169 NM Revenue Bd. Charge 168,440 367,040 350,695 317,069 (33,626) (9,59%)
4175 Water Mgmt Planning Sub-charge 182,898 753,278 824,720 200,000 (624,720) (75,75%)
4176 Watershed Planning/Rest Sub-charge 317,484 1,744,854 1,910,900 1,744,854 (166,046) (8.69%)
4177 Recycled Water & Local Supply Sub-charge 342,790 663,044 726,250 1,077,499 351,249 48,36%
4178 Water Conservation Sub-charge 1,652,411 1,445,736 1,583,000 1,572,999 (10,001) (0.63%)
4303 State Grant 25,086 0 0 0 0 N/A
SUBTOTAL 27,764,838 28,812,798 33,291,037 32,754,391 (536,646) (1,61 %)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 Operating Transfer In 1,000,000 591,702 591,702 0 (591,702) (100.00%)
SUBTOTAL 1,000,000 591,702 591,702 0 (591,702) (100,00%)
TOTAL REVENUES 29,023,285 30,568,168 33,989,366 32,838,070 (1,151,296) (3.39%)
A - 11
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
VALLEY OF THE MOON WATER DISTRICT
JAN 09
FEB 09
MAR 09
APR 09
MAY 09
JUN 09
JUL 09
AUG 09
SEP 09
OCT 09
NOV 09
DEC 09
I TOTAL VALLEY OF THE MOON I 0.0 I
144.7
139,6
141.1
235.9
169.4
186.6
165,8
287.7
252,3
158.7
176,9
128.1
2,186.7 I
0,0 I
0.0 I
* * * * DELIVERING AQUEDUCT * * * *
SUMMAR"jOF DELIVERY DATA Santa Rosa Petaluma Forestville Sonoma
TOTAL SANTA ROSA 16,034.5 0.0 0.0 2,860.3
TOT AL OTHER PRIME CONTRACTORS 773.8 17,873,9 0.0 4,024.7
507,3
TOTAL DELIVERIES TO PRIMES 16,808,3 I 17,873,9 I 0.0 I 7,392.3 I
LESS NORTH MARIN 0,0 (7,376,2) 0.0 0.0
TOTAL SONOMA COUNTY DELIVERIES 16,808.3 I 10,497.7 I 0.0 I 7,392,3 I
144.7
139.6
141.1
235.9
169.4
186.6
165,8
287.7
252.3
158.7
176.9
128,1
2,186.71
TOTAL
18,894.8
22,672.3
41,567.2 I
(7,376.2)
34,191.0 I
A - 11
2/25/20103:21 PM
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
JAN 09 35.8 145.7 181.5
FEB 09 30,2 120.3 150.5
MAR 09 9,5 130.9 140.5
APR 09 21,9 197,0 219.0
MAY 09 10.3 141.0 151.3
JUN 09 13.6 216.9 230.5
JUL 09 7.2 186.1 193,3
AUG 09 9.7 155.5 165.3
SEP 09 10.9 175.1 186,0
OCT 09 28,1 271.7 299.8
NOV 09 38,9 306,3 345.2
DEC 09 33.2 230.1 263.3
TOTAL CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 249.5 2,276,7 0.0 0,0 2,526.2
CITY OF COTATI
JAN 09 0,1 33.5 33,6
FEB 09 0,1 24.4 24.5
MAR 09 0.1 22.3 22.4
APR 09 0,7 138.9 139.7
MAY 09 0.6 50.2 50.8
JUN 09 1.2 83,6 84.8
JUL 09 1,1 70.0 71.1
AUG 09 1.4 95.4 96,8
SEP 09 1.0 78.9 79.9
OCT 09 0.4 49.2 49,5
NOV 09 0,3 49.2 49.5
DEC 09 0,2 41.6 41.8
I TOTAL CITY OF COTATIj 7.2 I 737.2 I 0,0 I 0.0 I 744.4 I
TOWN OF WINDSOR
JAN 09 45.2 0,0 45.2
FEB 09 40,0 0.0 40.0
MAR 09 42.4 0.0 42.4
APR 09 52.9 0,0 52.9
MAY 09 46.1 0,0 46,1
JUN 09 55,6 0.0 55.6
JUL 09 31.7 0.0 31,7
AUG 09 38.5 0.0 38,5
SEP 09 32.1 0,0 32.1
OCT 09 34.6 0.0 34,6
NOV 09 77,8 0.0 77.8
DEC 09 20.2 0.0 20.2
I TOTAL TOWN OF WINDSOR I 517,1 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 517.1 I
CITY OF SONOMA
JAN 09 105,6 105.6
FEB 09 83.6 83.6
MAR 09 88.6 88,6
APR 09 ,163.8 163.8
MAY 09 172.5 172.5
JUN 09 226,8 226,8
JUL 09 183.8 183.8
AUG 09 207.1 207.1
SEP 09 200,0 200,0
OCT 09 146.7 146.7
NOV 09 154.3 154,3
DEC 09 105.2 105.2
I TOTAL CITY OF SONOMAI 0,0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 1,838.0 I 1,838.0 I
A - 10 2/25/20103:21 PM
DATA ENTRY SHEET * * * * DELIVERING AQUEDUCT * * * *
Santa Rosa Petaluma Forestville Sonoma TOTAL
WA TER DELIVERED TO:
CITY OF SANTA ROSA (A)
JAN 09 1,206.6 0.0 0,0 160.9 1,367.5
FEB 09 992.1 0,0 0,0 144,9 1,137,0
MAR 09 919.5 0.0 0,0 204.3 1,123.7
APR 09 1,536.8 0.0 0.0 376.1 1,912.8
MAY 09 1,417.5 0.0 0.0 247.7 1,665.2
JUN 09 1,803.2 0,0 0.0 327.3 2,130,5
JUL 09 1,571.2 0.0 0,0 307,9 1,879.1
AUG 09 1,958.0 0.0 0,0 163.2 2,121.2
SEP 09 1,773.3 0,0 0,0 137.2 1,910.5
OCT 09 972.6 0,0 0,0 293.0 1,265.6
NOV 09 964.5 0,0 0.0 281.6 1,246.1
DEC 09 919.4 0.0 0.0 216.2 1,135.5
TOTAL SANTA ROSA 16,034.5 0.0 0.0 2,860.3 18,894.8
CITY OF PETALUMA
JAN 09 443.6 443,6
FEB 09 422.8 422.8
MAR 09 444,8 444.8
APR 09 823.4 823.4
MAY 09 636,5 636.5
JUN 09 947,8 947,8
JUL 09 808.9 808.9
AUG 09 919.0 919.0
SEP 09 744.2 744.2
OCT 09 460.2 460.2
NOV 09 477,1 477.1
DEC 09 355.6 355.6
I TOTAL PETALUMAI 0,0 I 7,483,9 I 0.0 I 0,0 I 7,483.9 I
NORTH MARIN WATER DISTRICT
JAN 09 187,5 187.5
FEB 09 790.7 790.7
MAR 09 490.2 490.2
APR 09 793.1 793.1
MAY 09 754,6 754.6
JUN 09 1,064,5 1,064.5
JUL 09 575.3 575,3
AUG 09 727,4 727.4
SEP 09 552.3 552.3
OCT 09 397.7 397.7
NOV 09 613.5 613.5
DEC 09 429,5 429.5
I TOTAL NORTH MARIN WATERI 0.0 I 7,376.2 I 0.0 I 0,0 I 7,376.2 I
A- 9
2/25/20103:21 PM
SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
ACTUAL WATER DELIVERY DISTRIBUTION BY AQUEDUCT (ACRE FEET)
PRIOR 12 MONTHS
* * * * DELIVERING AQUEDUCT * * * *
Santa Rosa Petaluma Sonoma TOTAL
DELIVERED TO:
CITY OF SANTA ROSA (A)
JAN 09 1,206.6 0,0 160.9 1,367.5
FEB 09 992,1 0.0 144.9 1,137.0
MAR 09 919.5 0,0 204.3 1,123.7
APR 09 1,536.8 0.0 376.1 1,912.8
MAY 09 1,417.5 0,0 247.7 1,665.2
JUN 09 1,803,2 0.0 327.3 2,130.5
JUL 09 1,571.2 0,0 307,9 1,879.1
AUG 09 1,958.0 0.0 163.2 2,121.2
SEP 09 1,773,3 0.0 137.2 1,910.5
OCT 09 972.6 0,0 293.0 1,265.6
NOV 09 964.5 0.0 281.6 1,246,1
DEC 09 919.4 0.0 216.2 1,135.5
TOTAL SANTA ROSA 16,034.5 0.0 2,860.3 18,894.8
OTHER PRIME CONTRACTORS (B)
CITY OF PET ALUMA 0,0 7,483.9 7,483.9
NORTH MARIN WATER DISTRICT 7,376.2 7,376.2
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 249.5 2,276,7 2,526.2
CITY OF COT A TI 7.2 737.2 744.4
TOWN OF WINDSOR 517.1 517.1
CITY OF SONOMA 1,838.0 1,838.0
VALLEY OF THE MOON DISTRICT 2,186,7 2,186.7
TOTAL OTHER PRIME CONTRACTORS 773.8 17,873,9 4,024.7 22,672.3
TOTAL DELIVERIES TO PRIMES 16,808.3 17,873.9 6,884,9 41,567.2
LESS: NORTH MARIN (7,376.2) (7,376.2)
TOTAL SONOMA COUNTY DELIVERIES 16,808,3 10,497.7 6,884.9 34,191.0
NOTE:
All amounts reflected in the above schedule are derived (via formula) from the water use summaries below.
The data entered below is derived from the water billing reports.
A-8
2/25/20103:21 PM
$526.96 Note: N. Marin doe~
42.99 not pay an Aq
74,62 Capital Charge.
20,00
664.56
$684.14
74,62
20,00
$778,76
$526,96
96,00
74,62
20.00
$717.58
$632.35 $632,35 $632.35
SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY RATES FOR WATER DELIVERIES IN FY 10-11
[ X] ESTlMA TED [ ] OFFICIAL
To Be Approved by Board of Directors on April 21,2009
CHARGEPERACREFOO~
Santa Rosa Petaluma
Aqueduct Aqueduct
PRIME CONTRACTORS
O&M Charqe [4.21
Water Management Planning Sub-charge [4.13]
Watershed Planning/Restoration Sub-charge [4.14]
Recycled Water & Local Supply Sub-charge [4.15]
Water Conservation Sub-charge [4.16]
O&M Charge
Capital Charqes - to build fund balance for future projects
Aqueduct Facilities Capital Charges [4,6 e]
$434,78
$4.01
35.00
21,61
31,55
$526.96
$434.78
$4.01
35,00
21,61
31,55
$526.96
Bond & Loan Charqes - to pay for existinq debt service
Storage Facilities Capital Charge [4,7]
Common Facilities Capital Charge [4.8]
Aqueduct Facilities Capital Charges [4.6 b]
Total Capital Charges
TOTAL PRIME CONTRACTORS
OTHER AGENCY CUSTOMERSIWHOLESALE CHARGES
(WATER CO'S & PUBLIC AGENCIES)
O&M Charge
Capital Charges
Aqueduct Facilities Capital Charge
TOTAL OTHER AGENCY CUSTOMERS/WHOLESALE CHARGES (4.12)
(120% OF h')9HEST PRIME)
FORESTVILLE
O&M Charge [4.2] *
Water Management Planning Sub-charge [4,13]
Watershed Planning/Restoration Sub-charge [4,14]
Recycled Water & Local Supply Sub-charge [4.15]
Water Conservation Sub-charge [4.16]
O&M Charge
Capital Charqes
Aqueduct Facilities Capital Charges [4,6]
Storage Facilities Capital Charge [4,7]
Common Facilities Capital Charge [4.8]
Total Capital Charges
TOTAL FORESTVILLE
* Forestville Water District exempt from Santa Rosa Aqueduct sub-charge from FY 06/07 to FY 16/17 [4.12],
22.93 22.93
63,70 63,70
$86,63 $86.63
$613,58 $613.58
$526.96 $526,96
86,63 86.63
$207.38 $207.38
$820.96 $820.96
$434,78
4.01
35,00
21,61
31.55
$526,96
0.00
22,93
63.70
$86,63
$613.58
NORTH MARIN WATER DISTRICT
O&M Charge
North Marin Bond & Loan Charge [4.9]
Russian River Conservation Charge [4,18 (a)]
Russian River Projects Charge [4.18 (b)]
TOTAL NORTH MARIN WATER DISTRICT
THIRD OFF-PEAK (MARIN MUNICIPAL)
Highest Prime
Russian River Conservation Charge
Russian River Projects Charge
TOTAL THIRD OFF-PEAK
SUPPLEMENTAL (MARIN MUNICIPAL)
O&M Charge
Capital Charge [4,11 (b)]
Russian River Conservation Charge
Russian River Projects Charge
TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL
SURPLUS
Non-Municipal/ Municipal [4,11 (a)]
(120% of O&M Charge)
Sonoma
Aqueduct
$434.78
$4,01
35,00
21.61
31,55
$526,96
$0.00
22,93
63,70
70,55
$157,18
$684.14
$526,96
157,18
$136,82
$820,96
Town of Windsor is charged 120% of the highest charge for any other prime contractor on the Santa Rosa Aqueduct from FY 06/07 to FY
21/22 [4.17 (a)]. Town of Windsor pays all subcharges [4.13, 4,14,4.15, and 4.16] on all water they divert from the Russian River using
their equipment [4.17 (b)].
The applicable section of the Restructured Agreement has been indicated in brackets.
A-5
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
D
WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
FY 10 -11 WATER CHARGES PER ACRE -FOOT
FOR PRIME CONTRACTORS
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
SANTA
ROSA
AQUEDUCT
% INCR.
(DECR.)
PETALUMA
AQUEDUCT
% INCR.
(DECR.)
SONOMA
AQUEDUCT
% INCR.
(DECR.)
2010/11
613.58
8.64%
613.58
8.64%
684.14
9.97%
2009/10
564.78
564.78
622.11
2008/09
471.13
511.13
486.22
2007/08
441.70
461.70
453.49
-
2006/07
431.29
451.29
442.60
2005/06
412.68
432.68
424.53
2004/05
402.51
422.51
414.42
2003/04
393.89
413.89
407.95
2002/03
387.49
397.90
387.43
2001/02
383.29
384.02
373.38
2000/01
330.76
331.61
320.74
1999/00
309.92
311.09
298.09
1998/99
299.23
300.72
299.17
1997/98
289.56
293.45
293.44
1996/97
282.11
286.10
285.18
1995/96
272.97
279.89
279.89
1994/95
271.74
278.22
287.12
1993/94
261.92
275.41
282.18
1992/93
260.13
275.10
289.16
1991/92
226.88
239.36
243.83
1990/91
232.85
246.12
252.03
1989/90
220.30
240.15
239.31
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
Water Education Program Materials
Water Ed Workbooks - development and printing
Spanish QWEL
Payments to Contractors from DWR Grant
Green Business Program
Bay Friendly Landscape
115,000
8,000
30,000
74,000
20,000
7,000
299,000
$
xxxx Payments to Contractors from State Grant
Pass through of DWR grant to contractors
$
74,000
74,000
Water Transmission
Page 69
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division: Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Section Title: Water Conservation
Character Title: Use of Money and Property Character No.:
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office.
Estimated interest is projected based on cash on hand and current interest rate trends.
Estimated Average Cash Balance (515,645)
Projected Interest Rate 1,00%
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash ($5,156)
675744-17
Character Title: Intergovernmental Revenues Character No.: 675744-20
2912 Town of Windsor
This item records revenue earned from the Town of Windsor for water diverted from the Russian River using the
Town's equipment. Restructured Agreement 4, 17b
'Character Title: Miscellaneous Revenues Character No.:
4102 Donations/Reimbursements
This item records the reimbursements expected by the water retailers to offset
Water Conservation Program expense. NMWD, VOM, Sonoma, Rohner! Park,
Cotati, Windsor, Petaluma, and Cal American
Water Contractor Reimbursement for Regional Programs-Washer Rebate,
SMART Controllers, Energy/Water, End Use Study,
Prop 13 - SMART Contollers
Prop 50 - Washer Rebate
4303 State Grants
This is for an anticipated Grant from CA Dept of Water Resources
$
74,000
675744-40
Character Title: Other Financing Sources Character No.:
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist - BOS
This item records transfers of funds from the O&M fund to provide for planned expenditures.
This includes revenue from water rates.
675744-46
$1,572,999
Services and Supplies
675744-60
Character Title:
6523 District Operation
This item is requested to provide for the charging of salaries, benefits and overhead costs for staff assigned to
projects budgeted within the Water Conservation Fund.
Water retailersreimburse $341,483 of this expense,
Water education Seasonal Staffing
7247
6536 Business Environmental Alliance
Agreement with the Economic Development Board
$
2319-22, 7190
$
7247
$
7189
$
7189
6570 Consulting Services
Low Impact Development
6584 Trade Shows
Sonoma County Fair
7022 Public Relations
Public Information and ACWA Campaign
7247 Water Conservation
Headwaters to Ocean Curr Devel.
Water Ed Facility Maintenance
Water Transmission
Page 69
Character No.:
900,000
25,000
925,000
50.000
50,000
30,000
30,000
20,000
20,000
$
175,000
175,000
25,000
20,000
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division: Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Section Title: Recycled Water and Local Supply
Character Title:
Use of Money and Property
Character No.:
675736-17
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office.
Estimated interest is projected based on cash on hand and current interest rate trends.
Estimated Average Cash Balance 178,100
Projected Interest Rate 1.00%
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash $1,781
Character Title:
Intergovernmental Revenues
Character No.:
675736-20
2912 Town of Windsor
This item records revenue earned from the Town of Windsor for water diverted from the Russian River using the
Town's equipment. Restructured Agreement 4.17b
Character Title:
Miscellaneous Revenues
Character No.:
675736-40
4102 Donations and Reimbursements
VOMWD, City of Sonoma, County, SCAPOSD, & SVCSD
for Groundwater Management Plain Sonoma Valley
3751
65,000
Santa Rosa, Windsor, Rohnert Park, Cotati, Sebastopol
Cal American, County of Sonoma for Santa Rosa Plain Study
7063
60,000
Santa Rosa, Windsor, Rohnert Park, Cotati, Sebastopol
Cal American, County of Sonoma for Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management
$ 125,000
Character Title:
Other Financing Sources
Character No.:
675736-46
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist - BOS
This item records transfers of funds from the O&M fund to provide for planned expenditures.
$1,077,499
Character Title:
Services and Supplies
Character No.:
675736-60
6523 District Operation
This item is requested to provide for the charging of salaries, benefits and overhead costs for staff assigned to
projects budgeted within the Recycled Water and Local Supply Fund.
DESCRIPTION
Sonoma/Alexander Valley Groundwater Management
USGS Petaluma Ground Water Study
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management
Managing 10-Year LRT2 Program
Sonoma Creek Seepage Study
Sonoma Valley - climate change modeling
PROJECT #
3751
TBD
7063
3944
TBD
3751
6523 Total
6570 Consultant Services
This item covers the costs of services provided by outside consultants.
DESCRIPTION
Sonoma/Alexander Valley Groundwater Management
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Study
Sonoma Creek Seepage Study
USGS Petaluma Groundwater Study
Sonoma Valley - climate change modeling
PROJECT #
3751
7063
TBD
TBD
3751
6570 Total
Requested
FY 10-11
125,000
30,000
220,000
25,000
15,000
15,000
$ 430,000
Requested
FY 10-11
475,000
150,000
90,000
50,000
7,500
$ 772,500
Water Transmission
Page 66
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division: Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Section Title:
Character Title:
Watershed PlanninglRestoration
Use of Money and Property
Character No.:
675728-17
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office.
Estimated interest is projected based on cash on hand and current interest rate trends.
Estimated Average Cash Balance (382,776)
Projected Interest Rate 1.00%
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash ($3,828)
Character Title:
Intergovernmental Revenues
Character No.:
675728-20
2912 Town of Windsor
This item records revenue earned from the Town of Windsor for water diverted from the Russian River using the
Town's equipment. Restructured Agreement 4.17b
Character Title:
Miscellaneous Revenues
Character No.:
675728-40
4102 Donations and Reimbursements
Funding for SR Plain Groundwater Study
Cooperative Funding Agreement with Santa Rosa,
Rohnert Park, Cotati, Windsor, Sebastopol, Cal-
American, and the County
7063-05
Character Title:
Other Financing Sources
Character No.:
675728-46
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist - BOS
This item records transfers of funds from the O&M fund to provide for planned expenditures,
$1,744,854
Character Title:
Services and Supplies
Character No.:
675728-60
6523 District Operations
This item is requested to provide for the charging of salaries, benefits and overhead costs for staff assigned to
projects budgeted within the Watershed Planning and Restoration Fund.
Russian River Instream Flow and Restoration Program (Biological Opinion Response) 1,065,610
$ 1,065,610
6570 Consultant Services
This item covers the costs of services provided by outside consultants,
Russian River Instream Flow and Restoration Program (Biological Opinion Response) $ 701,025
$ 701,025 :
6610 Legal Services
This item is requested to provide funds for the estimated cost of legal services to be provided by County
Counselor outside legal services, as required. 0
Water Transmission
Page 63
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division: Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Section Title: Water Management Planning
Character Title:
Use of Money and Property
Character No.:
675710-17
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office.
Estimated interest is projected based on cash on hand and current interest rate trends.
Estimated Average Cash Balance 1,015,864
Projected Interest Rate 1.00%
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash $10,159
Character Title:
Other Government Revenue
Character No.:
675710-20
2912 Town of Windsor
This item records revenue earned from the Town of Windsor for water diverted from the Russian River using the
Town's equipment. Restructured Agreement 4.17b
Character Title:
Other Financing Sources
Character No.:
675710-46
4625 aT - W/in Special Dist - BaS
This item records transfers of funds from the O&M fund to provide for planned expenditures,
Rate is calcualted to include a $750,000 reduction of existing fund balance,
$ 200,000
Character Title:
Services and Supplies
Character No.:
675710-60
6523 District Operations
This item is requested to provide for the charging of salaries, benefits and overhead costs for staff assigned to
projects budgeted within the Water Management Planning Fund,
Urban Water Management Plan PCAS No. 3700 475,000
475,000
6570 Consultant Services
This item covers the costs of services provided by outside consultants,
Urban Water Management Plan PCAS No,
3700
350,000
350,000
6610 Legal Services
3700-5
125,000
125,000
Water Transmission
Page 60
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division: Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Section Title: Common Facilities
Character Title:
Use of Money and Property
Character No.:
675421-17
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office,
Estimated interest is projected based on cash on hand and current interest rate trends.
Estimated Average Cash Balance (3,710,075)
Projected Interest Rate
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash
1.00%
($37,101)
Character Title:
Other Financing Sources
Character No.:
675421-46
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist - BOS
This item records transfers of funds into the Common Facilities fund to provide for planned capital projects.
Water Transmission Fund 2,203,500
Generator Financing 341,899
Total 2,545,399
Character: Fixed Assets Character No.: 675421-85
8528 Mirabel Generator Requested
DESCRIPTION PROJECT # FY 10-11
Mirabel Generator TBD 350,000
8528 Total 350,000
8529 Isolation Valves and Meters Requested
DESCRIPTION PROJECT # FY 10-11
Isolation Valves 7379 50,000
8529 Total 50,000
8552 Forestville Storage Tank Requested
DESCRIPTION PROJECT # FY 10-11
Forestville Storage Tank 7255 103,500
8552 Total 103,5()()
9105 Mirabel Fish Screen Replacement Requested
DESCRIPTION PROJECT # FY 10-11
Fish Screen Replacement 7357 1,000,000
9105 Total 1,0()O,OOO
9107 Air Valves Requested
DESCRIPTION PROJECT # FY 10-11
Air Valves 7429 150,000
9107 Total 150,000
9113 Wohler Site Improvement Requested
DESCRIPTION PROJECT # FY 10-11
Wohler HazMat Storage Facility TBD 0
Decommission Wohler Ponds 7358 200,000
9113 Total 200,000
9128 Local Hazard Mitigation Projects Requested
DESCRIPTION PROJECT # FY 10-11
Collector 3 and 5 Liquefaction Mitigation Predesign TBD 350,000
9128 Total 350,000
Character: Other Financing Uses
8625 Operating Transfer
Character No.:
675421-86
DESCRIPTION
Transfer to Pipeline for South Transmission System Pipeline
PROJECT #
3554
8625 Total
Requested
FY 10-11
o
o
Water Transmission Page 54
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division: Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Section Title: Pipeline Facilities
Character Title:
Use of Money and Property
Character No.:
675413-17
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office.
Estimated interest is projected based on cash on hand and current interest rate trends.
Estimated Average Cash Balance
Projected Interest Rate
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash
715,752
1'.00%
$7,158
Character Title:
Intergovernmental Revenue
Character No.:
675413-20
2852 Federal Grant
This account records the receipt of Federally awarded grants
Rogers Creek Fault Crossing - FEMA Grant
PCAS No. 7380
$1,500,000
Character Title:
Miscellaneos Revenues
Character No.:
675413-40
4102 Donations/Reimbursements
Reimbursement from North Marin Water District for the South
Transmission System Pipeline. Per the Restructured Agreement for
Water Supply, NMWD reimburses SCWA 13.14% of the expenses for
that project. SCWA invoices NMWD quarterly.
PCAS No. 3554
$0
Character Title: Other Financing Sources Character No.: 675413-46
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist - BOS
Transfer from Common Facilities for South Transmission System Pipeline PCAS No. 3554
Transfer from Santa Rosa Aqueduct Fund 675207 870,000
Transfer from Petaluma Aqueduct Fund 675215
$ 870,000
Character: Fixed Assets Character No.: 675413-85
9106 Santa Rosa Aqueduct Sections 2 & 3 (Slusser to Pet Aq) PCAS #
Preliminary Engineering Study TBD $ 320,000
Condition Assessment Study TBD $
Program Schematic Design TBD $ 50,000
$ 370,000
9128 Local Hazard Mitigation Projects
SR Aqueduct Sonoma Avenue (Rogers Creek Fault) 7380 $ 2,000,000
$ 2,000,000
9154 Petaluma Aqueduct
Condition Assessment Study TBD $250,000
Program Schematic Design TBD $50,000
$ 300,000
XXXX Sonoma Aqueduct
Condition Assessment Study TBD $
Program Schematic Design TBD $ 50,000
$ 50,000
9174 South Transmission System Pipeline 3554 $0
Water Transmission
Page 51
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
$0 balances to data input
Water Transmission
Page 48
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
Water Transmission
Page 48
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division:
Section Title:
Character Title:
Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Storage Facilities
Use of Money and Property
Character No.:
675405-17
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office,
Estimated interest is projected based on cash on hand and current interest rate trends.
Estimated Average Cash Balance 1,482,339
Projected Interest Rate 1,00%
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash
$14,823
Character Title:
Other Financing Sources
Character No.:
675405-46
4625 aT - W/in Special Dist - BaS
This item records transfers of funds into the Storage Facilities fund to provide for planned capital projects.
The next fiscal year's request records the following transfer into the Storage Facilities fund - per the
recommendation of the Water Advisory Committee, pursuant to the terms of the Master Water Supply
Agreement.
Storage Facilities Revenue Bond Fund '06
Operation & Manitenance Fund
$225,000
$423,700
Kawana - Ralphine Pipeline
Petaluma relocation (Cal- Trans)
Character:
Fixed Assets
Character No.:
675405-85
9162 Kawana to Ralphine Pipeline
DESCRIPTION
Preliminary Alignment Eng Study (Reliability and Enhancement)
PROJECT #
3763
Requested
FY 1 0-11
225,000
9162 Total
225,000
9154 Petaluma Aqueduct
DESCRIPTION
Cal- Trans required relocation of pipeline
PROJECT #
7393
Requested
FY 1 0-11
1,200,000
9171 Total
1,200,000
9171 Purchase Rights - Oakmont Pipeline
DESCRIPTION
Purchase from the City of Santa Rosa
PROJECT #
7135
Requested
FY10-11
9171 Total
o
Water Transmission
Page 48
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division: Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Section Title: Sonoma Aqueduct Capital Fund
Character Title:
Use of Money and Property
Character No.: 675231-17
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office.
Estimated interest is projected based on cash on hand and current interest rate trends.
Estimated Average Cash Balance
Projected Interest Rate
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash
125,047
1.00%
$1,250
Character Title:
Other Financing Sources
Character No.: 675231-46
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist - BOS
An Aqueduct Capital Charge of $0.00 per Acre Foot is being levied to accumulate funds for carrying
out capital replacement needs of the Sonoma Aqueduct - per recommendation of the Water Advisory
Committee, pursuant to the terms of the Master Water Supply Agreement. This amount is initially
deposited in the Water Transmission Agency Fund and later transferred to the Sonoma Aqueduct
Capital Fund pursuant to the terms of the Sixth Supplemental Ordinance.
Water Transmission
Page 22
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division: Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Section Title: Petaluma Aqueduct Capital Fund
Character Title:
Use of Money and Property
Character No.:
675215-17
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office.
Estimated interest is projected based on cash on hand and current interest rate trends.
Estimated Average Cash Balance
Projected I nterest Rate
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash
5,589,295
1,00%
$55,893
Character Title:
Other Financing Sources
Character No.:
675215-46
4625 aT - W/in Special Dist - BaS
An Aqueduct Capital Charge of $0.00 per Acre Foot is being levied to accumulate funds for carrying
out capital replacement needs of the Petaluma Aqueduct - per recommendation of the Water Advisory
Committee, pursuant to the terms of the Master Water Supply Agreement. This amount is initially
deposited in the Water Transmission Agency Fund and later transferred to the Petaluma Aqueduct
Capital Fund pursuant to the terms of the Sixth Supplemental Ordinance.
Character Title:
Other Financing Uses
Character No.:
675215-86
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist - BOS
Operating Transfer to Pipeline, #675413, per Long-range Financial Plan
$0
Water Transmission
Page 16
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division: Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Section Title: Santa Rosa Aqueduct Capital Fund
Character Title:
Use of Money and Property
Character No.: 675207-17
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office,
Estimated interest is projected based on cash on hand and current interest rate trends,
Estimated Average Cash Balance
Projected Interest Rate
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash
5,403,140
1.00%
$54,031
Character Title:
Other Financing Sources
Character No.: 675207-46
4625 or - W/in Special Dist - BOS
An Aqueduct Capital Charge of $0 per Acre Foot is being levied to accumulate funds for carrying
out capital replacement needs of the Santa Rosa Aqueduct - per recommendation of the Water Advisory
Committee, pursuant to the terms of the Master Water Supply Agreement. This amount is initially
deposited in the Water Transmission Agency Fund and later transferred to the Santa Rosa Aqueduct
Capital Fund pursuant to the terms of the Sixth Supplemental Ordinance.
Character Title:
Other Financing Uses
Character No.: 675207-86
8625 or - W/in Special Dist - BOS
Operating Transfer to Pipeline per Long-range Financial Plan
Santa Rosa Aqueduct Sections 2 & 3 TBD
Rogers Creek Fault Crossing PCAS # 7380
$870,000
370,000
500,000
Water Transmission
Page 13
2/25/20103:21 PM
Character:
Other Charges (contd.)
675108-75
Character No.:
8010 Contribution to Non-County
This item normally provides funding to partner organizations that help to achieve the Agency's water
supply goals. This includes the Business Environmental Alliance, the North Bay Watershed Association and
the Russian River Watershed Association. No fundings are requested for the 10-11 fiscal year.
Character:
Fixed Assets
Character No.:
675108-85
8510 Buildings / Improvements
This item is requested to provide funds for replacement and or improvement projects that may need to be
undertaken during the fiscal year.
8533 SCWA - New Metered Service PCAS No, 2885 - 2894
This item provides funds for the installation of meters, turnouts and taps on the Agency's pipelines,
Reimbursement for these expenditures is budgeted in 675108-3666, Meter Service /Installation.
8560 Equipment
This item is requested to provide funds for equipment purchases which may be identified during the
fiscal year.
Character:
Other Financing Uses
Character No.:
675108-86
8625 OT - W/in Special Dist - BOS
This item is requested to transfer revenues collected as part of the rate for capital improvements and debt
service payments, These transfers are made pursuant to the terms of the Master Water Supply Agreement
and the Sixth Supplemental Ordinance.
Santa Rosa Aqueduct Capital Fund
Petaluma Aqueduct Capital Fund
Sonoma Aqueduct Capital Fund
Common Facilities Fund
Storage Facilities Fund
North Marin Deposit
Sonoma Aqueduct Revenue Bond Fund
Storage Facilities Rev Bond Fund 2003
Storage Facilities Rev Bond 2006 Fund
Common Facilities Rev Bond Fund 2003
Common Facilities Rev Bond 2006 Fund
State Loan Debt Service Fund
State Loan Reserve Fund
Water Management Planning Fund
Watershed Planning/Restoration Fund
Recycled Water and Local Supply Fund
Water Conservation Fund
Total
o
o
o
2,545,399
423,700
76,300
294,115
357,755
449,236
500,280
401,125
1,196,268
119,627
200,000
1,744,854
1,077,499
1,572,999
$10,959,156
Character:
675108-90
Appropriations for Contingencies
Character No.:
9000 Appropriations for Contingencies
This reserve is established for unanticipated costs which may arise during the fiscal year.
Water Transmission
10
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
Character:
Services and Supplies (continued)
Character No.:
675108-60
7052 Out of State Use Tax
This item budgets for use tax collected by the State of California on purchases from out-of-state vendors.
7201 Gas / Oil
Gas/Oil includes the costs of gas, diesel, and oil to operate the Agency's emergency generators.
7206 Equipment Usage Charge
This item is requested to provide funds for equipment usage,
7212 Chlorine Chemical/Recorder
This sub-object provides funds for the purchase, of chlorine gas used in chlorinating water prior to
transporting to customers. This sub-object also provides funds for caustic soda required by the pH system,
7217 State Permits I Fees
This item is requested to provide funds for various permits and fees required by the State for Agency
operations.
7250 Reimbursable Projects
This item is used to account for expenses that will have an offsetting revenue.
7296 FERC Fees / Costs
This item is requested to provide funds for fees paid to the Federal Energy Commission for licensing costs
associated with the Agency's Hydro-Electric facility at Warm Springs Dam.
7302 TravelExpense
This item is requested to provide funds to cover the cost of travel expenses to meetings and seminars
by Agency staff.
7303 Private Car Expense
This item is requested to provide funds to reimburse employees for the use of their private vehicles,
7320 Utilities
This item is requested to provide funds for utility costs other than power for the water transmission system,
7394 Power
The item is requested to provide funds for electrical energy costs required to meet the pumping demands
of the water transmission system and to operate other water transmission facilities.
Character:
Other Charges
Character No.:
675108-75
7980 Depreciation
This item is requested to provide appropriations for depreciation of the water transmission system buildings,
improvements and equipment. All completed construction projects from Storage Facilities, Pipeline
Facilities and Common Facilities are transferred to the Water Transmission fund upon completion and
depreciation is booked in the Water Transmission fund, No cash expenditure of funds is made,
Water Transmission
9
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
Character:
Services and Supplies (continued)
Character No.:
675108-60
6553 Contract - Security Services
This item is requested to provide funds to contract for outside security services to patrol Agency facilities
at Wohler and Mirabel.
6570 ConsuftantServices
This item covers the costs of services provided by outside consultants,
7111
7258
Requested
FY 10-11
125,000
125,000
150,000
160,000
30,000
150,000
120,000
DESCRIPTION
IBM Hosting Services
LBNL Contract (TOUGH2 model)
USGS Water Quality (Diversion Facilities)
Surface Water/Groundwater Model (HEC)
Dry Creek Stream Guages
Engineering Studies (Ground Water Banking)
Miscellaneous Small projects
PROJECT #
6570 Total
860,000
6610 LegalServices
This item is requested to provide funds for the estimated cost of legal services to be provided by County
Counselor outside legal services, as required,
6820 Rents and Leases - Equipment
This item is requested to provide funds for rents and leases of equipment.
6880 Small Tools - Instruments
This item is requested to provide funds for the purchase of small tools, instruments and equipment that are
individually under $5,000,
6889 Software
This account provides funds for productivity software packages,
Water Transmission
8
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
Character:
Services and Supplies (contd.)
Character No.:
675108-60
6180 Maintenance - Buildings (Contd.)
7092
7002
Requested
FY 10-11
30,000
100,000
150,000
75,000
75,000
100,000
40,000
20,000
250,000
905,000
DESCRIPTION
Mirabel - Transformer Covers (Caissons 3, 4, & 5)
Mirabel - Caisson 4 Electrical Upgrade
Mirabel - Potable Water Line
Pond Flow Monitoring Instruments
Wilford Booster Motor & Switch Upgrade
Wohler & Mirabel - Turbidimeters
Wohler & Mirabel - Fuel Storage Sump
Wohler Caustic Pump Spare
Miscellaneous Small Purchases
PROJECT #
6180 Total
6262 Laboratory Supplies / Expenses PCAS No. 609-2, 609-5, 3288
This account records expenses for supplies and expenses associated with the laboratory.
6280 Memberships
This account records expenses for memberships to professional organizations.
6461 Supplies / Expenses PCAS No. 702, 3288
This account records expenses for routine office supplies and expenses.
6512 Testing / Analysis PCAS No. 609-2, 3288
This account records expenses incurred to comply with all regulatory testing requirements.
6523 District Operations PCAS No. Various
This item provides funds for staff costs when working on Water Transmisssion.
It is anticipated that $10,600,000 will be needed for operations and maintenance of the system,
Water Transmission
7
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
Character:
Services and Supplies
Character No.:
675108-60
6040 Communications
This item is requested to provide funds for communication costs for radio, telephone and data line
charges,
6140 Maintenance. Contracts and Equipment PCAS No, Various
This item is requested to provide funds for purchase of small equipment and for annual equipment
maintenance contracts. Details provided below.
DESCRIPTION PROJECT #
Requested
FY 10-11
Battery Service Agreement
Cathodic Protection - Caissons 2, 3,4 and 5
Caustic Soda Metering Pump Parts
Chlorine Parts and Detectors, spare pH/Chlorine Analyzer
Electrical Equipment, Annual Calibration
Purafil Media Replacement
Mini-Trolls
Pond Maintenance
SONDE (quantity 5)
Stream Gauge Monitoring 0617 -05
Telemetry System Replacements (RTU) with SCADApack
Test Equipment and Software
Transfer Switch Maintenance
Water System Instrument Spares
Water Treatment - Lab Process 0609-02
Electrical & Mechanical Supplies
Wohler/Mirabel switchgear & transformer maintenance
Wohler Transformer Maintenance (4 MVA & 7 MVA)
Wohler/Mirabel and Warm Springs Dam 12 kV PM
9,000
20,000
9,000
60,000
12,000
70,000
15,000
50,000
60,000
41 ,000
75,000
15,000
25,000
50,000
90,000
200,000
60,000
25,000
80,000
Wohler/Mirabel CCTV Upgrade
10,000
Miscellaneous
6140 Total
976,000
6180 Maintenance - Buildings PCAS No. Various
This item is requested to provide funds for contractual costs associated with projects to maintain
the pumping, storage, pipeline and hydro-electric facilities, Details provided below.
DESCRIPTION
PROJECT #
Requested
FY 1 0-11
Kawana Booster Pump Mechanical Seal
65,000
Continued on Next Page
Water Transmission
6
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
CHARACTER JUSTIFICATION
Department - Division: Sonoma County Water Agency - Water Transmission
Section Title: Water Transmission Agency Fund
Character Title:
Use of Money and Property
Character No.:
675108-17
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash
This account records interest on pooled cash held for the Agency by the County Treasurer's office,
Estimated interest is projected based on anticipated cash balance and an interest rate forecast by the,
Sonoma County Treasurer for the County Pooled Investment Program for the coming fiscal year,
Estimated Average Cash Balance 6,367,974
Projected Interest Rate 1.00%
Projected/Planned Interest on Pooled Cash $63,680
Character Title:
Charges for Service
Character No.:
675108-30
3666 Meter Service / Installation
This item reflects revenue received for installation of water meters. Actual revenues fluctuate from year to
year based on requests for service. Expenditures associated with meter installation are budgeted in
675108-8533, SCWA - New Metered Service,
Character Title:
Miscellaneous Revenues
Character No.:
675108-40
4039 Sale - Power
This item records revenue from the sale of power generated at the Warm Springs Dam hydro-electric plant
and sold to Pacific Gas & Electric Company. The contract with PG&E expired on November 3, 2009.
It was renegotiated with PWRPA on a variable rate contract equal to the instantaneous rate that Water
Transmission is charged, This contract will also give renewable energy credits to PWRPA and thereby allow
the Agency to partially meet its renewable energy goal of "Carbon-free Water" by 2015.
4161 Water Sales - O&M inclusive of four subcharges
4162 Common Facilities Revenue Bond Charge
4163 Storage Facilities Revenue Bond Charge
4164 Sonoma Aqueduct Revenue Bond Charge
4165 Petaluma Aqueduct Revenue Bond Charge
4166 Santa Rosa Aqueduct Capital Charge
4167 Petaluma Aqueduct Capital Charge
4168 Sonoma Aqueduct Capital Charge
4169 North Marin Revenue Bond Charge
$ 28,209,087
$ 2,242,129
$ 806,991
$ 294,115
$
$
$
$
$ 317,069
Under the terms of the Sixth Supplemental Ordinance adopted in December 2002, all water transmission
system revenues are to first be deposited in the Agency fund and later transferred to the appropriate capital
or debt service funds, The line items listed above are used to record receipt of these revenues,
Beginning July 1,2006, all revenues received for the four subcharges are likewise received in the Agency's
O&M fund and transferred to each subcharges' designated fund.
Revenue is based on deliveries of
49,853
Acre Feet
Water Transmission
5
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Index No.: 675108
Adopted Requested Percent
Sub-Object No. and Title 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
EXPENDITURES:
APPROPRIATIONS FOR CONTIN.
9000 Appropriations for Contingencies $140,000 $140,000 $0 0,00%
Subtotal Approp. for Contingencies $140,000 $140,000 $0 0.00%
I TOTAL EXPENDITURES $37,110,878 $37,880,774 $769,896 2.07% I
TOTAL NET COST $3,121,512 $5,042,703 $1,921,191 61.55%
(Ex enditures Minus Revenues)
Water Transmission Page 4
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Index No.: 675108
Adopted Requested Percent
Sub-Object No. and Title 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
EXPENDITURES:
SERVICES AND SUPPLIES (Contd.)
6553 Contract - Security Services 25,000 50,000 25,000 100.00%
6570 Consultant Services/Studies 826,245 860,000 33,755 4.09%
6610 Legal Services 52,500 50,000 (2,500) (4,76%)
6616 Change of Venue 0 0 0 N/A
6680 Public/Legal Notices 5,000 10,000 5,000 100,00%
6820 Rents and Leases - Equipment 54,992 70,000 15,008 27.29%
6880 Small Tools - Instruments 23,508 75,000 51 ,492 219.04%
6889 Software 50,000 25,000 (25,000) (50,00%)
7052 Out of State Use Tax 0 0 0 N/A
7201 Gas / Oil 5,000 5,000 0 0,00%
7206 Equipment Usage Charge 500,000 500,000 0 0.00%
7212 Chlorine Chemical/ Recorder 1,157,329 1,100,000 (57,329) (4,95%)
7217 State Permits / Fees 30,000 30,000 0 0,00%
7250 Reimbursable Projects 10,000 10,000 0 0.00%
7296 FERC Fees / Costs 9,000 5,000 (4,000) (44.44%)
7297 Riverfront Park Levee Maintenance 90,000 100,000 10,000 11,11%
7302 Travel Expense 15,000 20,000 5,000 33,33%
7303 Private Car Expense 5,000 2,500 (2,500) (50,00%)
7320 Utilities 4,120 2,500 (1,620) (39.32%)
7394 Power 5,812,419 5,250,000 (562,419) (9,68%)
Subtotal SelVices and Supplies $20,710,635 $21,111,000 $400,365 1.93%
OTHER CHARGES
7920 Interest $0 $120,618 $120,618 N/A
7980 Depreciation $5,261,301 $5,400,000 $138,699 2.64%
8010 Contribution to Non-County $0 $0 $0 N/A
8090 Loss on Fixed Asset $0 $0 $0 N/A
Subtotal Other Charges $5,261,301 $5,520,618 $259,317 4.93%
FIXED ASSETS
8510 Buildings /Improvements $0 $30,000 $30,000 N/A
8533 SCWA - New Metered Service 20,000 20,000 0 0.00%
8560 Equipment 0 100,000 100,000 N/A
Subtotal Fixed Assets $20,000 $150,000 $130,000 650.00%
OTHER FINANCING USES
8625 aT - Wlin Special Dist - BaS $10,978,942 $10,959,156 ($19,786) (0,18%)
Subtotal Other Financing Uses $10,978,942 $10,959,156 ($19,786) (0.18%)
Water Transmission Page 3
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
FY 2010-11 BUDGET
SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Section Title: WATER TRANSMISSION AGENCY FUND
Sectionllndex No: 675108
Adopted Requested Percent
Sub-Object No. and Title 2009-10 2010-11 Difference Change
REVENUES:
USE OF MONEY
1700 Interest on Pooled Cash $86,627 $63,680 ($22,947) (26.49%)
Subtotal Use of Money $86,627 $63,680 ($22,947) (26.49%)
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
3666 Meter Service / Installation $20,000 $20,000 $0 0.00%
Subtotal Charges for Service $20,000 $20,000 $0 0.00%
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
4039 Sale - Power 1,300,000 875,000 (425,000) (32.69%)
4040 Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 N/A
4102 Donations and Reimbursements 10,000 10,000 0 0,00%
4161 Water Sales - O&M 23,006,836 23,613,735 606,899 2,64%
4162 Common Rev, Bd, Chg, 2,479,916 2,242,129 (237,787) (9.59%)
4163 Storage Rev. Bd. Chg. 805,353 806,991 1,638 0,20%
4164 Sonoma Aq, Rev. Bd. Chg, 293,367 294,115 748 0,25%
4165 Petaluma Aq, Rev, Bd. Chg. 0 0 0 N/A
4166 Santa Rosa Aq. Cap. Chg. 0 0 0 N/A
4167 Petaluma Aq. Rev. Bd, Chg, 0 0 0 N/A
4168 Sonoma Aq, Cap, Charge 0 0 0 N/A
4169 NM Revenue Bond Charge 350,695 317,069 (33,626) (9,59%)
4175 Water Mmgt Planning Sub-charge 824,720 200,000 (624,720) (75.75%)
4176 Watershed Planning/Rest Sub-charg 1,910,900 1,744,854 (166,046) (8.69%)
4177 Recycled Water&Local Sply Sub-cha 726,250 1,077,499 351,249 48,36%
4178 Water Conservation Sub-charge 1,583,000 1,572,999 (10,001) (0,63%)
Subtotal Miscellaneous Revenues $33,291,037 $32,754,391 ($536,646) (1.61%)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
4625 OT - W/in Special Dist - BOS 591,702 0 (591,702) (100,00%)
Subtotal Other Financing Sources $591,702 $0 ($591,702) (100.00%)
TOTAL REVENUES $33,989,366 $32,838,070 ($1,151,296) (3.39%)
EXPENDITURES:
SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
6040 Communications 57,135 60,000 2,865 5,01%
6140 Maintenance Contracts & Equip. 1,072,481 976,000 (96,481 ) (9.00%)
6180 Maintenance Projects 950,000 905,000 (45,000) (4.74%)
6262 Laboratory Supplies 27,412 30,000 2,588 9.44%
6280 Memberships 85,000 75,000 (10,000) (11,76%)
6410 Postage 2,750 1,000 (1,750) (63,64%)
6461 Supplies / Expenses 56,641 80,000 23,359 41,24%
6512 Testing / Analysis 147,438 210,000 62,562 42.43%
6522 District Administration (Equip Chg) 9,000 9,000 0 0,00%
6523 District Operations (Staff Chg) 9,627,665 10,600,000 972,335 10,10%
Water Transmission Page 2
2/25/2010 3:21 PM
-r
Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings {This sectionfor City Clerk Use Only}
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
· Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding "em ail authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to 3/9/10 City Council Agenda
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
· Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets ITEM NO. 14.2
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No, 2008-173
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
Department:
Submitted By:
Submittal Date:
Agenda Title:
March 9,20 I 0
Development Services
Darrin Jenkins, Development Services Director/City Engineer
March 4, 20 10
Consideration of Sonoma County Water Agency Budget
Requested Council Action: Consider oral report from Water Issues Subcommittee and provide
input to Rohnert Park's Water Advisory Committee member
regarding the Sonoma County Water Agency Fiscal Year 2010-
2011 Budget
Summary:
This transmits Sonoma County Water Agency's Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Budget. The SCW A Water
Advisory Committee makes an advisory recommendation to the SCW A Board of Directors regarding
each fiscal year's budget. The advisory vote will take place at a special meeting of the Water
Advisory Committee on March 22, 2010. The Rohnert Park Water Issues Subcommittee is
anticipated to make a recommendation to the City Council at the March 9, 20 I 0, meeting.
The budget was recommended for approval by the SCW A Technical Advisory Committee on March
1,2010. The budget was prepared in accordance with the Restructured Agreement for Water Supply
between SCW A and the prime contractors.
Rohnert Park is charged the Petaluma Aqueduct rate proposed at $613.58 per acre-foot, an 8.64%
increase from last year. The SCW A budget is increasing by only 2.07%. However, the Restructured
Agreement provides that the lesser of the last three-year-average and the prior year's water sales are
used as the basis for rate setting. Because water sales were 7.6% lower than budgeted last year, the
net effect is an 8.64% rate increase compared to last year.
Enclosures: Proposed SCW A Budget FY 20 I 0-20 I 1
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item (X) Regular Time
(X ) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
Per Interim City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item. (Revised 031309)JH:TG-S:05-b
,~
3/9/10 City Council Agenda
ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
WATER ISSUES COMMITTEE MEETING
AGENDA
ITEM NO. 14.2
Friday, March 5, 2010
4:15 p.m.
Rohnert Park City Hall Council Chambers
130 A vram Avenue
Committee Members:
Gina Belforte, Vice Mayor
Jake Mackenzie, Council Member
City Staff:
Darrin Jenkins, Director of Development Services / City Engineer
John McArthur, Director of Public Works & Community Services
4:15 p.m.
REGULAR SESSION - Open to Public
Call to Order
1, Public Comments, if any
2. Sonoma County Water Agency Update
3. Proposed FY 10-11 Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) Budget
4. Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance
5.' Rohnert Park Staff Update
6. Additional Comments, if any
7. Adjournment
Posted in accordance with state law.
Any writings or documents related to items of business referred to on this Agenda that are subject to disclosure and distributed
with the agenda or handed out at the meeting wi!! be available for public inspection in the City Manager's Office at 6750
Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, CA during normal business hours.
Disabled Accommodation: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending
this meeting, please contact (707) 588.2226 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure accommodations.
AGENDA FORECAST
March 23rd Meeting
6:00 p.m.
Regular Meeting
Pledge: Zoe Keller, Waldo Rohnert Elementary School
SSU ASI Speaker of the Senate, Jesse Schwartz
Mavor's Presentation
3/23 Lindsay Catton - SSU All American Women's Soccer Award
Department Head Briefing
Consent Calendar
2010- Amending the Nationwide Deferred Compensation Plan (457)
2010- Grant Application Authorization
Individual Items
Budget
Ordinances
Campaign Finance Regulation Ordinance (adoption)
Matters for/from Council
3/16 - Chamber Board of Directors' meeting [PS]
3/22 - WAC/TAC [JM]
Community Development Commission
City of Rohnert Park
03/09/10 Council Agenda
Item No. 14.5
Centennial Campfire
February 8,2010
i
Petaluma Veteran's Memorial Hall
Petaluma, CA
~
{!~1 ~crto~~(
~ q~ ~eDQ-(t/,F~
tf-9 . CJ-k'f ~J~
~...-~ I'RO
cc:
File:
File:
Unit City Committee Cubmaster Chartering Organization
Chairperson
Pack 1 Rohnert Park Robert Halversen Tim Miller St. Elizabeth Seton Catholic Church
Pack 3 Petaluma Karen Wood Brent Wood Petaluma Kiwanis Club
Pack 4 Cotati Gina McCloskey Tom Behnke Lions Club of Cotati
Pack 6 Petaluma Bill Putnam Tim HUQhes Petaluma KniQhts of Columbus
Pack 8 Petaluma Shannon Selstrom Ben Demsher Rotary Club of Petaluma
Pack 16 Sonoma Shauna Aubin Bryan Aubin Valley of the Moon Lions Club
Pack 51 Glen Ellen Jayne Phillips Bill Schoeffler Glen Ellen Community Church
Pack 84 Petaluma Michele Sutton Brian Crosby Lions Club of Petaluma 7-11
Pack 101 Rohnert Park Ann Smith Eric Simpson LOS Rohnert Park 3rd Ward
Pack 102 Rohnert Park Joni Cook Adam Cook LOS Rohnert Park 2nd Ward
Pack 105 Petaluma Duncan Werner Frank Burnell LOS Petaluma 1st Ward
Pack 113 Sonoma Jason Sutter Michael Miller LOS Sonoma Ward
Unit City Committee Scoutmaster Chartering Organization
Chairperson
Troop 2 Petaluma Greg Moore Jamie Lindberg Elks Lodge #901
TroQP 4 Cotati Mary Tullock Keith Schoenthal Lions Club of Cotati
Troop 7 Petaluma Ilona Fague Mike Johnson VFW Pos.t #1929
Troop 8 Petaluma Jennifer Masterson Erik Masterson Rotary Club of Petaluma
Troop 9 Petaluma Gina McCloskey John Shempf Elim Lutheran Church
Troop 16 Sonoma James Osborne Ken Perry Valley of the Moon Lions Club
T r()()p 23 Rohnert Park Lisa Quinn Ray Davis Cross and Crown Lutheran Church
Troop 63 Glen Ellen Julie Shoffner-McGee Tim McGee Parent Group
Troop 68 Rohnert Park Brett Myrum Art Zimmer Rohnert Park/Cotati Rotary
Troop 74 Petaluma Dan DeMars Mike Jayne Lions Club of Petaluma 7-11
Troop 101 Rohnert Park Robert Llewellyn Paul Eagar LOS Rohnert Park 3rd Ward
Troop 102 Rohnert Park David Wheeler Roy Ferris LOS Rohnert Park 2nd Ward
Troop 104 Petaluma Bill Joslin Kit Groves LOS Petaluma 2nd Ward
Troop 105 Petaluma David Durr Dave SpanQler LOS Petaluma 1 st Ward
Troop 113 Sonoma Jason Sutter Robert Adams LOS Sonoma Ward
Troop 222 Sonoma Kathy Peterson Charles Price Valley of the Moon Lions Club
Troop 431 Rohnert Park Stephen Brown Dana Clemensen & Veterans of Foreign Wars
Allen Sisk
Unit City Committee Advisor Chartering Organization
Chairperson
Crew 4 Cotati Dan Ramos Larry Peterson Cotati Lions Club
Crew 2026 Council Danielle InQ Ed SQuire Friends of the ClimbinQ Wall
Crew 105 Petaluma David Durr Chris Monson LOS Petaluma 1 st Ward
Ship 1 Petaluma Binkv Thorsson Barry Thorsson Kiwanis Club of Petaluma
Team 101 Rohnert Park Robert Llewellyn Paul Eagar LOS Rohnert Park 3rd Ward
Team 102 Rohnert Park David Wheeler Rov Ferris LOS Rohnert Park 2nd Ward
Team 105 Petaluma David Durr Spencer Curren LOS Petaluma 1st Ward
Post 31 Kenwood Bob Uboldi Ben Gulson Kenwood Fire Protection District
Post 91 Penngrove Frank Trainer Garrett Piland Rancho Adobe Fire District
Post 110 Sonoma Brett Sackett Eddie Engram Cijy of Sonoma Police Dept.
Post 9400 Petaluma Bob Green Doug Cole Wilmar Volunteer Fire Dept.
Post 1268 Sonoma Debrah Preseten Walt Lewis Young Eagles
Post 500 Rohnert Park Tara Douglas Segt. Michael Bates Rohnert Park Dept. of Public Safety
Post 858 Petaluma Steve Hood Aaron Garihan Petaluma Police Department
Post 911 Sonoma Mike Mulas Lino Sottile Shell-Vista Fire Protection District
Post 360 Rohnert Park Mack Lewis California Highway Patrol
Miwok District - Unit Leadership
diligently to complete their tasks, maintaining a safe environment during the daily
work and safely securing the site at night.
We were impressed with the professionalism, the quality of work and the
timeliness of the Rohnert Park Public Works Department operation. We wanted
to recognize them and thank them for their efforts to maintain a safe and well-
maintained city in an era of reduced budgets and manpower.
Sincerely,
~~-~
Debbie Jones-Gipson
781 Holly Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
G~~r~~
760 Holly Avenue
Rohnert Park, 94928
Ql\O
'~
Bill Gibson
770 Holly Aven
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
March 4} 2010
The Honorable Pam Stafford
Mayor
City of Rohnert Park} California
94928
Dear Mayor Stafford}
A street light near our houses on Holly Avenue stopped working at night. It is on
the dark side of a curve and without the light a safety hazard for residents and
drivers at night. We reported it to the Rohnert Park Public Works Department.
Our first contact} Jeanene} was courteous and helpful. She took the necessary
information about the light pole, said she would get it to the Public Works
personnel concerned} and that someone would be there within three days to
determine the problem.
Within two days} an electric company technician arrived, checked the light,
wires, and pole. When we approached} he courteously answered our questions
and told us that the problem was in the wiring outside the pole.
The next day a Rohnert Park City truck stopped. Mike Bracewell} Utilities Services
Supervisor, explained to us that the wire to the street light needed to be replaced
as well as the wooden pole.
Within a week the wires running to the pole had been replaced. By the end of the
next week the light pole had been replaced and the street} sidewalks, parked cars
and dark curve were again well lighted.
We want to thank Mike Bracewell and Jeanene for their timely} courteous and
informative manner.
We also want to thank the members of the Public Work Department and
personnel who worked to put in the wires and pole. They worked quickly and
diligently to complete their tasks, maintaining a safe environment during the daily
work and safely securing the site at night.
We were impressed with the professionalism, the quality of work and the
timeliness of the Rohnert Park Public Works Department operation. We wanted
to recognize them and thank them for their efforts to maintain a safe and well-
maintained city in an era of reduced budgets and manpower.
Sincerely,
~~-~.
Debbie Jones-Gipson
781 Holly Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
d(jtillWj LJ~
Ginny Wester~erg L/
760 Holly Avenue
Rohnert Park, ';A 94928
Q~n
'~
Bill Gibson
770 Holly Aven
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
2.
cc:
File:
File:
March 4, 2010
The Honorable Pam Stafford
Mayor
City of Rohnert Park, California
94928
Dear Mayor Stafford,
A street light near our houses on Holly Avenue stopped working at night. It is on
the dark side of a curve and without the light a safety hazard for residents and
drivers at night. We reported it to the Rohnert Park Public Works Department.
Our first contact, Jeanene, was courteous and helpful. She took the necessary
information about the light pole, said she would get it to the Public Works
personnel concerned, and that someone would be there within three days to
determine the problem.
Within two days, an electric company technician arrived, checked the light,
wires, and pole. When we approached, he courteously answered our questions
and told us that the problem was in the wiring outside the pole.
The next day a Rohnert Park City truck stopped. Mike Bracewell, Utilities Services
Supervisor, explained to us that the wire to the street light needed to be replaced
as well as the wooden pole.
Within a week the wires running to the pole had been replaced. By the end of the
next week the light pole had been replaced and the street, sidewalks, parked cars
and dark curve were again well lighted.
We want to thank Mike Bracewell and Jeanene for their timely, courteous and
informative manner.
We also want to thank the members of the Public Work Department and
personnel who worked to put in the wires and pole. They worked quickly and
From:
Sent:
@sonoma.edu
esday, March 03, 2010 9:08 PM
Lids r, Beth; burche@sonoma.edu
Stafford, Pam; Belforte, Gina
Stop Walmart Superstore
Hello,
I?~c~>
414 Jf/E'D
I( () .
"
;010
I am a resident of Rohnert Park and I hope you say no to Walmart's expansion here. It will not bring the kind of revenue
needed for the city and in fact will lead to great loss of jobs and tax income for the city.
PLEASE STOP WALMART.
Dr. Elizabeth Burch
Chair, Communication Studies
Respectfully,
Elizabeth Burch, Ph.D.
Communication Studies Department
Sonoma State University
1801 East Cotati Avenue
Rohnert Park, California 94928 U.S.A.
Phone: (707) 664-4059; Office (707) 664-2149 Fax (707) 664-4400
.. -.
~-tl'<e. E:JhP sf-' ,
~SJ kt:.>rJ~~Jc:... f1~'aJ.k; .
~~ ~".>~ cA '9..r4lo4
'7,4;:. :1:::::1'::::1:3" .",.,,~ 0, .--.. '.:''',' '...,.....
,~.- 't-!l.;',.,c.J.:.l::.LQ .pJ1r.1, ,1.:t
.~ . . .
RECEIVED
FEe .2 6 2010
ClTY OF ROHNERT PAAK
P)~nnl::l CO~h-t ,"S IOJ/\
c./O ~~ Auen
(U p.... \, I an Copy ~o:
't-- ~ Copy to:
13C~~~
QUAJ/CA C>J4~;).i
I
I
I
I
I
\ Dec;...r Hec:ds of tt..e... l?chne,..+ Pc..r).<
I pJ~nnl~ CDh'lWI.<SSIOh) ,
Il,I I..) IfB.lllltl. n'l I. ..11",,11.,1,1, n III ,fl,H"IlIIl,1
:r ~ a..- COhcerYlecl.- c:.~+"Z,e.h # :r:
J reo'&.) ,"z e. .J OtA- o..../e. ,he;'h.:} )~bbi'e .ve:;
I h"-,,,oL k> ~Ilaw -t\.. e . R. P. we...l Mc..rt +D
I
e><~ tl-s sfoJ'e. 11-, I~S dec.'-s /01"1 i.vNI
I. Ce)"+......\....~ ~-r-Fec.+- jo~r ~~cJ..,'IJ.h!'n
11 cxS' LJ~J ~)-+ d,~+I-~.s ct>)-rl~tA.h:.h'e S ot/er
i 0- hv..l't'lbe.-r o.p (j e~$ t -rh i's dec..'S ;"'0;-'
I~.s +-0 be.. ho~r -fi..c2. .j~d. of' fL..e
I pe<:>p}G2.. .:l f h.,::d~ the. <::.,'f,'z en S W~Q i..; 1J)
\tU? 'fu,\ ~~~:~ ;: :::,~~3!:se~
I .
115<;j To W A;1- PI A1CT,'
i
j
i
i
II
I
I
I
I
I
k:1-''\e Ernes1-
lss-! L- E511~.:-- pI
-:#1026
Sc..~ -k.- l<o~ L A
qs-'fo,-/
Hauff. Judy
, . . , .
.J/1 (Il)'
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Denniswal@aol.com
Tuesday, February 09,201010:12 PM
Hauff, Judy
(no subject)
I enjoy shopping at a quality market like Pacific, Please don't certify the wall mart environmental impact report please
send to the planning commission and city council.
Lidster, Beth
s oster [packopugs@sbcglobal.net]
T eSday, February 23,20103:38 PM
Admin
Spreckels Performing Arts Center
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear Mr. Schwartz,
I am shocked and dismayed th t the city of Rohnert Park would con closing what I
in the landscape of Sono nty. In these troubled times Spreckels remain a
presentations of the Arts. ast weekend the venue h "The Seafar nd ' tale Fo
excellent adult fare and a children's musical. No where n h of San Francisco is this a possibility
Park.
Certainly the onl son for curtailing the continuation of presentations at the center is finan I. Please look at the
revenue that the orming Arts Center brings to the community. People attending performances frequent your
restaurants, buy gas, stay at the hotels to cite a few positives.
I've been told this may be temporary, let's be realis
Sincerely,
Sherrie
Lidster, Beth
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Janice Wright Uaniceright@hotmail.com]
Tuesday, February 23,20 :18 PM
Admin; Stafford, Pam; Be , Gina; Breeze, Amie; Call"
Spreckel's Performing Art ter
PLEASE consider options other than closing Spreckel's Performing Arts Center. Perhaps the knowledge
that this beautiful facility lose will prompt the public to brainstorm and offer other viable solutions.
Thank you for considerati ice Wright
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microso
1
Lidster. Beth
Dear Mr. Schwarz
would be very willing to serve on a
en. a group of concerne ens in Son
so ys to bring monies to the center. I wo
get tog er to see what we could come up with before t
time constraint but perhaps we could find a way to keep t
what could be done to keep Spreckels Pe
County, non-profit arts organization lea
e happy to see if I could ral orne of t organizations to
dget has to be cut in thi rea. I understand there's a major
nter open next year.
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
PETBALLET@aol.com
Tuesday, February 23,20105:48 PM
Admin
Regarding Spreckels
Ann Derby
Petaluma City Ballet
Artistic Director
707-765-2660 (of e) /707-765-1194 (fax)
1
March 1, 2010
TO: STATE, COUNTY
AND CITY OFFICIALS
'(' ~jo.
City ofRohnert Park
03/09/I 0 Agenda
Item No. 13
PG&E
Ann Derby
Janice Wright
Sherrie Foster
Dennis Wal
Katie Ernest
Elizabeth Burch, Ph.D.
IL COMMUNICATIONS
,2010 Meeting
Application to provide summer 2010 rate relief
Opposed to closing Performing Arts Center
Opposed to closing Performing Arts Center
Opposed to closing Performing Arts Center
Opposed to Walmart expansion
Opposed to Walmart expansion
Opposed to Walmart expansion
3/1/10
2/23/10
2/23/10
2/23/10
2/09/10
2/25/10
3/03/10
Communications Distributed at meeting (3/09/10)
~~-~~~-~-~~-~~~-~
.- ~.~- ....---- ..-,-". ',........ "'--" ''-.
'RJ:c;~'rVED
~.-~ .\.._~ ------.'
316/~o / C:;1
MAR
'J.'. . \,,\
X~
~, . .~~
v ;r'
Ccf;.. ..2)" 7?~-~ fL ~
~.
a::r X<~{/ftfts-? r; .7. ,7-'.~7j' ;r!!--e~/~
~ 7I'~- Zk "~ .i[f~. Y,;?Ec&4L
/U/M 2? /Lljfi( o/&/iru/' .~/ \j>/rr~~~(
.72> 7t!!~::~ ~ 4~::-~: t()~ hav-e
~. .1Le~t^e/, (&NJ( :~:tr~t ' . _~ . . ( .
/Ju:,/~A (5Nt7&~f"Y~k4, '?T-UA'/j
P:e~ 1-., €~wf3t ~ -r ,klc2?-?', 7k;:f S
/1-1 4--ri:.:q/"J1-'~}a:>~"Ajl&IT~/e ~v2?~
-~- . . ~-l- '.' 7;) .' f'i
1~;1. yU8~~6.'t1y' '~./l./"O U..:0f~/~/;;-c~C/1-V--~/C-I""
/ve!:---f ~/ 'VCS::L-:?OX ,r~~c0~Z/~/~~ . ~~~~8, ' .
/V~71)::/Jr13 t;::t? .~V z:: l!{J1 ~L-- l?b(PVJ!.G--t;i(j:, Ej) !
7 crD /Wu C~! -"/Jldcl---? f--~l ~-j .,;L..-t./ly-.
?:::~::l'r;t::::;~~~:!r:k~
~ ~P~IU~jr ~ Pdvf
I~<& W?//~ ~ rU~~1'
......-'
/1/LAd'f/1 ;~ f~'V) n ./.~ ..
///",-()T). f,/}~')//7 /
Lj &-) v' ~ / // .do' /'7/~/ / p - I .~ / . n I '. /7~ i' /t -/.' .
t>/ 6/' V / ~ 'Cj'\ y/LC.,.< '--'~" _...../ ~ VI (/ ~
;ed~trtf-vf ?(J:0JL (~ '/ C;tJ ']:5
;iJ~ -h fA)!fZ/ ItAe1 if'pya;n ~l ~/Vl
'S
Pop-Facts: DemOgti3pbic. Spapshot Report
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
EXIDBIT 9
PAGE30F3
Place, (see appendix for geographies), aggregate
Description
Total
Place
%
2014 Projection
2009 Estimate
2000 Census
1990 Census
42,836
42,219
42,236
36,358
Growth 2009-2014
Growth 2000-2009
Growth 1990-2000
1.46%
-0.04%
16.17%
White Alone
Black or African American Alone
American Indian and Alaska Native Alone
Asian Alone
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone
Some Other Race Alone
Two or More Races
42,219.00
31,982 75.75
745 1.76
356 0.84
3,098 7.34
196 0.46
3,349 7.93
2.493 5.90
Not Hispanic or Latino
Hispanic or Latino:
Mexican
Puerto Rican
Cuban
All Other Hispanic or Latino
42,219.00
34,616 81.99
7,603 18.01
5,341 70.25
252 3.31
52 0.68
1,958 25.75
~ittIEllJl~tlflfl[flrrul~,.;mt~l~~!t.t.t'l
White Alone
Black or African American Alone
American Indian and Alaska Native Alone
Asian Alone
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone
Some Other Race Alone
Two or More Races
7,603.00
3,317 43.63
46 0.61
168 -2.21
42 0.55
9 0.12
3,231 42.50
790 10.39
,.. ~ Prepared On: Fri Jan 29, 2010
CU\F: II.u,S
Prepared For;
Page
Of 12
Claritas Tech Support: 1 8008666511 D 5 R
<<)20IOCLARlTASINC,AIlrightsreserved.' IrE EPORTS
Prepared By:
Prepared For:
Area Map
PRINLA RY TRADE AREA
Order #: 968483049
Site: 01
Zip Code
See Appendix for Geographies
bVest date Par l: '; . Bennptt'D�f1ey Cemetery, ;:
t
Santa Rosa Gott Course `= -1
r �a,4aAad ,t'nt 4^�
- LL
•� �'} � t.%; 'Y III U1 -1 �feliterttary School
Cook Junior Hi h School' `t
1 g
Rosa
Bennett Valley i3cdf ,.
r
uria de.�ar•tto
Robert L Steven Elem Schopl
Golgan Creel, Bennett Valley Etenter-rt. ,
L
ie
Souti Nst Cpty �aI: u�
-
Parks
Hydrography
aly High 3 ,. to
Elsie Allen High Sch
of Matanzas Creel
AAve
Rem erttar oiToi
t�rt,e,uei+
rial Lavvil t'Frxt" 7•'a1y '�
Bellevue Elementary Sc�1oa1
rest, Manierit ty
PpIld
i.vfisr � d ;�tu.f.
n
iv
--,
�
� Sq
•anti � ainr, u,4 v,
"Fr
�: ... ~
t((I nlc is f3'`fli
� � � ll ❑ , �
J, Hlllorest Elemei'it3ry School Re ery oir
a m r y r> -
- ' Got Pv Ic , ce;•s
VI-
Gravenstein Elententar5 Soi8o ". - a ; 01 n
- �.orlirnt!
A s
Rohn1it Pa!! Stadn i C eei side Middle School
tr. , 1311 kit.
oYR,: ,,0rrvi Rd �,
c. �' `Sunrise littri:
"lei Ra
s 1
Doroti�►y R SPecl,els Pa Cerrter
Q. f e
:�
r "y7
L ke Arls,tr F
no m, State Unix_isit3.
r
Waldo Rohneq•Ele errt try Sch
? 0rtof3tla -tra Ele met School
Y3 I
lrtar;r
`
1
F
gUGH
.. 0,
Order #: 968483049
Site: 01
Zip Code
See Appendix for Geographies
0 miles 1.02 2.05
N
WE
S iN
W y
Prepared on: January 31, 2010 Page 1 of 2
® 2010 CLARITAS INC. All rights reserved.
La, k I'A 5 Claritas Tech Support: 1 800 866 6511 SITE,�EAC}RTS
Interstate Highways
US Highways
State Highways
tubjor Highways
lutajor Roads
Roads
Railroads
Landmarks
Parks
Hydrography
,77
,carports
Zip Code
0 miles 1.02 2.05
N
WE
S iN
W y
Prepared on: January 31, 2010 Page 1 of 2
® 2010 CLARITAS INC. All rights reserved.
La, k I'A 5 Claritas Tech Support: 1 800 866 6511 SITE,�EAC}RTS
Pop-Facts: Demographic Snapshot Report
PRIMARY TRADE AREA
E:kmBIT 9
PAGE 1 OF 3
ZIP, (see appendix for geographies), aggregate
Description
Total
ZIP
%
2014 Projection
2009 Estimate
2000 Census
1990 Census
89,601
85,827
80,798
64,967
Growth 2009-2014
Growth 2000-2009
Growth 1990-2000
4.40%
6.22%
24.37%
White Alone
Black or African American Alone
American Indian and Alaska Native Alone
Asian Alone
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone
Some Other Race Alone
Two or More Races
85,827.00
57,014 66.43
1,938 2.26
1,542 1.80
5,276 6.15
336 0.39
14,427 16.81
5,294 6.17
Not Hispanic or Latino
Hispanic or Latino:
Mexican
Puerto Rican
Cuban
AU Other Hispanic or Latino
85,827.00
59,186 68.96
26,641 31.04
21,556 80.91
523 1.96
101 0.38
4,461 16.74
White Alone
Black or African American Alone
American Indian and Alaska Native Alone
Asian Alone
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone
Some Other Race Alone
Two or More Races
26,641.00
9,196 34.52
166 0.62
720 2.70
89 0.33
36 0.14
14,249 53.49
2,185 8.20
".~ PreparedOn: SunJan31,201O Page
C:u~,RI [AS
Prepared For:
Of 12
Clarilas Tech Support: 1 8008666511 D 5 R
It) 2010 CLARITAS INC. All rights reserved, . ITE EPORTS
Prepared By:
0"wel 4-' EEGAN & COPPIN COMPANY, 11.N`-...-
;sM1lteegttn t S Cuppitt TAI
"ra + uv t'
TOTAL EXISTING RETAIL VACANCY ESTIMATES
Fourth Quarter, 2009
Sonoma County
40.0%
36.0%
32.0%
28.0%
24.0%
20.0%
16.0%
12.0%
8.0%
4.0%
0.0%
Petaluma Rohnert Park Santa Rosa Other
13 Direct Vacancy
• - •- �- - •+: -+•+•. �+ .:.:......... nii�r to <Al nr lw a and is subicet to change orwithdraiv.d.: ut interested party should ecrift• the status of the property and the information herein.
I M
9
I~
.y
00
Total
Existing
Buildings
Gross Leasable
Area
Vacancy
Planned
(Sq. Ft.)
Sq. Ft.
(%)
(Sq. Ft.)
Petaluma
2,593,924
290,136
11.2%
895,000
Rohnert Park
3,333,047
399,782
12.0%
95,000
Santa Rosa
7,894,729
735,124
9.3%
345,700
Other
3,549,443
173,401
4.9%
127,293
Total
17,371,143
1,598,443
9.2%
1,462,993
40.0%
36.0%
32.0%
28.0%
24.0%
20.0%
16.0%
12.0%
8.0%
4.0%
0.0%
Petaluma Rohnert Park Santa Rosa Other
13 Direct Vacancy
• - •- �- - •+: -+•+•. �+ .:.:......... nii�r to <Al nr lw a and is subicet to change orwithdraiv.d.: ut interested party should ecrift• the status of the property and the information herein.
I M
9
I~
.y
00
Golf Course Dr, Rohnert Park, CA 94928 to 646 E Cotati Ave, ...
EXHIBIT 7
PAQg) OF 3
http://maps .google.com
;~
,:0 'J
,~ ,.
"4 ,; /:;.
;~ .'" " ":'
1'-\ c~'
To see all the details that are visible on the
screen,use the "Print" link next to the map,
-\
<.J
Driving directions to 646 E Cotati Ave, Cotati, CA 94931
".:-
\{\9 901 Golf Course Dr
I Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Directions to 646 E Cotati Ave, Cotati, CA 94931
3.6 mi - about 8 mins
1. Head northeast on Golf Course Dr toward Hacienda Way
2. Turn right at Snyder In
3, Turn right at E Cotati Ave
Destination will be on the left
0.6 mi
2.1 mi
,; 0.8 mi
<fl 649 E Cotati Ave
{ Cotati, CA 94931
These directions are for planning purposes only, You may find that construction projects, traffic, weather, or other events may cause
,f2
2/6/1 0 2:38 P:
, Golf Course Dr, Rohnert Park, CA 94928 to 6340 Commerce Bl...
EXHIBIT 7
PAGE 2 OF 3
http://maps .google.com
,.
,;1
.~"..... J
j ,
'",)
To see all the details that are visible on the
screen, use the "Print" link next to the map.
Driving directions to 6340 Commerce Blvd, Rohnert Park, CA 94928
c Directions to 6340 Commerce Blvd, Rohnert Park, CA 94928
\( ~~~~e~f ;a~~~S;:~4928 1.9 mi - about 5 mins
~.._._..~~..,.~-,.,.. -_.~~A~_~~..__._._._..._..__ '_u_'.'~.-"L_'_'~_~~.. _.~ __. '~'.-~....-",-, ,.,,_,.,'" .'L~"""~_.' '4',',' '_,o.<-~~~~'__'_-"_"_'~C'" . __.~~.__." .___,..-'~. '_>."
1. Head northeast on Golf Course Dr toward Hacienda Way
2. Make a U-turn at Hacienda Way
3. Take the 1 st left onto Country Club Dr
4, Turn right at Rohnert Park Expy
5, Turn left at Commerce Blvd
Destination will be on the left
62 ft
449 ft
1.0 mi
0,7 mi
325ft
\8) 6340 Commerce Blvd
'I Rohnert Park, CA 94928
2
2/6/10 2:29 P
01 Golf Course Dr, Rohnert Park, CA 94928 to 4625 Redwood Dr,...
EXHIBIT 7
PAGE 1 OF 3
http://maps.google.co
"g()
To see all the details that are visible on the
screen,use the "Print" link next to the map.
Driving directions to 4625 Redwood Dr, Rohnert Park, CA 95407
1.6 mi - about 5 mins
Via Millbrae Ave, Millbrae Ave
qp :~~~~f ~a~~~~AD~4928
-'=C_'''__''~=~''''=',_,,_~,,"~~.,,_U'.'~_'..L~.-~'~.e_,,'_'-=~__. ..,._...._ __.....'-"-_ ,,__,_,"y,._..._ ."_ ~..~.'. ,,_...'_'~ -_~..~_,..-c.,,_.,,-.~.__, J .._._';__.~..'" _ .___ "~.~-jC_._,,~~.i--C_
1, Head northeast on Golf Course Dr toward Hacienda Way
2. Make a U-turn at Hacienda Way
3. Turn right toward Redwood Dr
4. Take the 1st right onto Redwood Dr
5. Make a U-turn
62 ft
1.1 mi
O,2mi
0.2 mi
0,1 mi
)f2
2/2/10 10:35 A
RMP Opportunity Gap - Retail Stores
Area ZIP Codes (see appendix for geographies), Total
EXHIBIT 6
PAGE30F3
Retail Stores
Limited-Service Eating Places-7222
Special Foodservices-7223
Drinking Places -Alcoholic Beverages-7224
2009 Demand
(Consumer Expenditures)
58,031,372
11,664,429
6,495,796
2009 Supply
(Retail Sales)
54,889,915
13,348,180
2,940,116
GAFO *
General Merchandise Stores-452
Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores-448
Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores-442
Electronics and Appliance Stores-443
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, Music Stores-451
Office Supplies, Stationery, Gift Stores-4532
323,141,884
168,509,497
59,899,170
25,468,943
31,404,506
25,258,103
12,601,665
733,394,703
478,016,744
23,863,771
50,836,442
120,823,369
45,973,768
13,880,609
Opportunity
Gap/Surplus
3,141,457
(1,683,751)
3,555,680
(410,252,819)
(309,507,247)
36,035,399
(25,367,499)
(89,418,863 )
(20,715,665)
(1,278,944)
* GAFO (General merchandise, Apparel, Furniture and Other) represents sales at stores that sell merchandise normally sold in
department stores, This category is not included in Total Retail Sales Including Eating and Drinking Places.
Claritas' RMP data is derived from two major sources of information. The demand data is derived from the Consumer Expenditure
Survey (CE Survey), which is fielded by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The supply data is derived from the Census
of Retail Trade (CRT), which is made available by the U.S. Census.Additional data sources are incorporated to create
both supply and demand estimates.
The difference between demand and supply represents the opportunity gap or surplus available for each retail outlet in the
specified reporting geography. When the demand is greater than (less than) the supply, there is an opportunity gap (surplus)
for that retail outlet. For example, a positive value signifies an opportunity gap, while a negative value signifies a surplus.
Of 4
"..~ PreparedOn: SunJan31,2010 Page
c: L'~\ R II!>, S Project Code: '
Prepared For:
3
Claritas Tech Support: 1 800 866 6511
<92010 CLARITAS INC. All rights reserved.
Prepared By;
D S,TEREPORTS
EXHIBIT 6
PAGE20F3
RMP Opportunity Gap - Retail Stores
Area ZIP Codes (see appendix for geographies), Total
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, Music Stores-451
Sportng Goods, Hobby, Musical Inst Stores-4511
Sporting Goods Stores-45111
Hobby, Toys and Games Stores-45112
SewlNeedleworkIPiece Goods Stores-45113
Musical Instrument and Supplies Stores-45114
Book, Periodical and Music Stores-4512
Book Stores and News Dealers-45121
Book Stores-451211
News Dealers and Newsstands-451212
Prerecorded Tapes, CDs, Record Stores-45122
2009 Demand 2009 Supply Opportunity
(Consumer Expenditures) (Retail Sales) Gap/Surplus
144,866,334 123,751,312 21,115,022
108,802,653 103,972,368 4,830,285
36,063,681 19,778,944 16,284,737
59,899,170 23,863,771 36,035,399
43,278,042 17,092,563 26,185,479
2,752,690 828,051 1,924,639
10,875,224 7,403,664 3,471,560
2,424,390 630,945 1,793,445
23,334,305 5,054,392 18,279,913
1,037,124 1,053,751 (] 6,627)
2,854,309 2,121,760 732,549
8,464,306 3,183,763 5,280,543
8,156,822 3,587,445 4,569,377
7,512,898 3,587,445 3,925,453
643,924 0 643,924
25,258,103 45,973,768 (20,715,665)
16,841,342 32,746,528 (] 5,905,] 86)
8,236,451 21,148,405 (12,911,954)
5,425,881 8,772,114 (3,346,233 )
1,413,264 1,353,901 59,363
1,765,746 1,472,108 293,638
8,416,761 13,227,240 (4,810,479)
5,830,599 7,758,439 (1,927,840)
5,559,482 7,727,005 (2,167,523)
271,117 31,434 239,683
2,586,162 5,468,801 (2,882,639)
168,509,497 478,016,744 (309,507,247)
81,485,593 151,496,951 (70,0 II ,358)
87,023,904 326,519,793 (239,495,889)
27,966,578 36,027,273 (8,060,695)
2,117,326 2,564,589 (447,263)
12,601,665 13,880,609 (1,278,944)
7,115,661 10,736,563 (3,620,902)
5,486,004 3,144,046 2,341,958
2,812,727 7,641,117 (4,828,390)
10,434,860 11,940,958 (] ,506,098)
78,276,043 78,850,160 (574, I ] 7)
138,025,301 131,128,324 6,896,977
61,833,704 59,950,113 1,883,591
Retail Stores
Gasoline Stations-447
Gasoline Stations With Conv Stores-44711
Other Gasoline Stations-44719
Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores-448
Clothing Stores-4481
Men's Clothing Stores-44811
Women's Clothing Stores-44812
Childrens, Infants Clothing Stores-44813
Family Clothing Stores-44814
Clothing Accessories Stores-44815
Other Clothing Stores-44819
Shoe Stores-4482
Jewelry, Luggage, Leather Goods Stores-4483
Jewelry Stores-44831
Luggage and Leather Goods Stores-44832
General Merchandise Stores-452
Department Stores Excl Leased Depts-4521
Other General Merchandise Stores-4529
Miscellaneous Store Retailers-453
Florists-453I
Office Supplies, Stationery, Gift Stores-4532
Office Supplies and Stationery Stores-45321
Gift, Novelty and Souvenir Stores-45322
Used Merchandise Stores-4533
Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers4539
. Non-Store Retailers-454
Foodservice and Drinking Places-722
Full-Service Restaurants- 7221
".~ PreparedOn: SunJan31,201O Page
C LJ... R II,,,,,. S Project Code:
Prepared For:
2
Of 4
Claritas Tech Support: 1800 866 6511
<<:> 2010 CLARIT AS INC. All rights reserved,
Prepared By:
D S,TEREPORTS
EXHIBIT 6
PAGE l'of3
RMP Opportunity Gap - Retail Stores
Area ZIP Codes (see appendix for geographies), Total
2009 Demand 2009 Supply Opportunity
Retail Stores (Consumer Expenditures) (Retail Sales) Gap/Surplus
Total Retail Sales Inel Eating and Drinking Places 1,259,469,024 2,281,171,857 (1,021,702,833)
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers-441 203,793,131 559,763,197 (355,970,066)
Automotive Dealers-4411 174,392,813 508,412,691 (334,019,878)
Other Motor Vehicle Dealers-4412 11,711,184 21,279,487 (9,568,303)
Automotive PartsiAccsrs, Tire Stooos-4413 17,689,134 30,071,019 (12,381,885)
Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores-442 25,468,943 50,836,442 (25,367,499)
Furniture Stores-4421 13,783,607 29,950,800 (16,167,193)
Home Furnishing Stooos-4422 11,685,336 20,885,642 (9,200,306)
Electronics and Appliance Stores-443 31,404,506 120,823,369 (89,418,863)
Appliances, TVs, Electronics Stores-44311 23,455,175 96,994,066 (73,538,891 )
Household Appliances Stores-443111 5,067,570 7,645,818 (2,578,248)
Radio, Television, Electronics Stores-443112 18,387,605 89,348,248 (70,960,643)
Computer and Software Stores-44312 6,598,853 20,165,009 ( 1 3,566, 156)
Camera and Photographic Equipment Stores-44313 1,350,478 3,664,294 (2,313,816)
Building Material, Garden Equip Stores -444 121,180,497 316,682,291 '( 195,50 1,794)
Building Material and Supply Dealers-4441 111,410,511 307,207,274 (195,796,763)
Home Centers-44411 46,323,624 119,505,373 (73,181,749)
Paint and Wallpaper Stores-44412 2,444,533 ' 6,251,148 (3,806,615)
Hardware Stores-44413 9,783,043 39,937,196 (30,154, I 53)
'other Building Materials Dealers-44419 52,859,311 141,513,557 (88,654,246)
Building Materials, Lumberyards-444191 20,556,717 55,362,210 (34,805,493)
Lawn, Garden Equipment, Supplies Stores-4442 9,769,986 9,475,017 294,969
Outdoor Power Equipment Stores-44421 1,457,140 1,313,306 143,834
Nursery and Garden Centers-44422 8,312,846 8,161,711 151,135
Food and Beverage Stores-445 173,133,901 292,432,886 (I 19,298,985)
Grocery Stores-4451 157,791,272 279,478,509 (121,687,237)
Supermarkets, Grocery (Ex Conv) Stores-44511 150,073,993 266,657,553 ( 116,583,560)
Convenience Stores-44512 7,717,279 12,820,956 (5,103,677)
Specialty Food Stores-4452 4,827,670 6,860,079 (2,032,409)
Beer, Wine and Liquor Stores-4453 10,514,959 6,094,298 4,420,661
Health and Personal Care Stores-446 61,687,020 23,022,320 38,664,700
Phannancies and Drug Stores-44611 52,815,874 19,106,720 33,709,154
Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies, Perfume Stores-44612 2,158,555 807,859 1,350,696
Optical Goods Stores-44613 2,738,890 35,158 2,703,732
Other Health and Personal Care Stores-44619 3,973,701 3,072,583 901,118
"..~ Prepared On: Sill,lJan31,201O Page
C V, R If A S Project Code:
Prepared For:
Of 4
Claritas Tech Support: 18008666511
1i::12010 CLARITAS INC, All rights reserved.
Prepared By:
D S,TEREPORTS
EXHIBIT 5
Dear Professor Eyler,
I checked with our buyers and department heads and was provided the following information
on product variety by the departments you asked about. These are not what we call SKU's
(stock keeping units) which include all products, For example, if a brand of beer comes in a six
pack or twelve pack, this product is only counted as one item, not two.
The information also includes the amount of these products that come from local producers ~
mostly Sonoma County, but some from the Northern California area,
#: of items
Comments
Over 600 varieties of wine
80% are local wines
325 varieties of tea
25 different brands
80 varieties of coffee
6 local brands representing 85% of all sales
250 varieties of beer
60 local brands, the largest selection in the area
350 varieties of cheese
about 1/3 of all cheese is local
· A~'R~
· CCL Coordinator
· Pacific Market
· 901 Golf Course Drive
· Rohnert Park, CA 94928
· (707) 585-9643 ext. 321
· (707) 585-9123 fax
· anisiar@pacificmkt.com
.
This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain
confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the attorney-client
privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient,
you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive this in error,
please notify the sender by reply email and delete this message. Thank you,
'l,~' " "'-';])
DOWNWARD PRESSURE ON WAGES AND BENEFl;rs
IN THE G<<OCERyINDuSTRY
EXHIBIT 4
PAGE20F2
~, The eotry ofsupeicentersioto l~C Bay Area market will exert substantial downward wage
and benefit pressure in the grocery industry, a sector that currently is a source of high-
wage entry-level jobs.
. ,
~ The average grocery job in the large Bay Area supermarket chains eU,rrently pays wages
and benefits worth about $42,552 per year, o{which about a third is the value of the
benefit package (including health care coverage, vacation, holiday and sick leave).
:> Conve1."sely, supcrcentcrs will offer Lotal compensation (wages and benefits)estima~ed at
$11.68 per hour Jes~v than this, Qr about $21,000 less yearly per average grocery
~mployee.
). If l()wcr wage, big box grocery'stores obtain an 18 percent market share ove~ the next
several years. as indicated in other urban area'), this wagc/benefit payn;U is estiplated to,
fall by as much as $677 million. .
);> Lower regional incomes mean ~ess spending on other gooch; and services. Through
multiplier effects. the net econQmic impact of lhis reduction of wages and benefits to the
-regional economy t?ould be more than dc.mblc thedircet loss.
. I
Comparison ofEstiDJated Wages and Benefits for Unionized
Supermarkets in the Bay 'Area and Wal-Mart Supercenters in the U.s.
Union-grocers, . Wal-Mart
study area U.S.'
Average hourly wage, all workers
Health,& welfare benefits per hour
. Pension benefits per h.our
Premium pay, per-hour basis
Vqcation. per-hour basis
Sick leave. per-hour basis
Benefits package (exql. prem,ium pay)
Total wages and ben,efits, per hour
Benefits/premiums, pE!rCent of base wage
Difference !
,As percent of Wal-Maft hourly
$15.3'0
4.57
1.35
0.77
0.92
0.73
7.57
$23.64
35%
$11.68
98%
$9.60
0.81
0.22
0.48
0.38
0..46
1.87
$11.95
20%
Source: l~eport, Tnble 20
EXHIBIT 4
J> AQlil ofL~_
, '
SUPERCEN'TERS AND THE TRAN'SFORMATION
OF l'HE BAY AREA G'R,OCERY INDUSTRY:
I
Issues,' Trends, and Impacts,
n
JI\
~
l.
!
"
..,t.-..t:.
.... ~. .,
. l!{j,'~"r':~~" , II
'~I . .! -t ., I I
." < J I
, ..... -.til' t~'<~
llP,!:>ii'p".",""ll..... 1....~-:<Y.~~~mYlI>.~.
j~J~iHt}~!.1flj:{t~;~{i~~}~~i7f~, 1L%. ~~'4Yl.:.ri~,.,.i 'f:': ..~;r.:l~~~i1C(!
/J.
"
,l:.,lj"'I'
"
I
'l:I:'
f....
-
-
REPORT OVERVIEW & SUMMARY
Bay Area Economic Forum
January 2004
~
BAY AREA~COUNOL '
~
~~~~.
~~.
, ~"
BAY AREA
ECONOMIC,
FORUM
A Parlnmhip ofll,,! AsIociatitm
ofRayAna~ .
and tltl! Buy An:o C,nmcil,
0, , ' Association
, of Bay Area
Governments
:onPapers: The Effects of Wal-Mart on Local Labor Markets
http://econpapers.repec.orglpaper/izaizadps/dp2545.ht
EXHIBIT 3
EconPapers Home
About EconPapers
Working PaQers
Journal Articles
Books and Chaoters
Software C.omponent~
Authors
JEL codes
New Economics Papers
Advanced Search
:" Quick Search ":'
.._-~~-...--.........."""",........~">-~.~?'~
EconPaoers FAO
Cookies at EconPapers
Archive maintainers FAO
Format for printing
The RePEc bloq
The Effects of Wal=Mart on
Local labor Markets
David Neumark (dneumark@uci.edu), 1!d.DiY.
ZhanSl (iuzh~clarku.edu) and Steohen /11.
Ciccarella (smc227@cornell.edu)
No 2545, IZA Discussion Paoers from Institute
for the Study- of Labor JIZA)
Abstract: We estimate the effects of Wal-Mart
stores on county-level retail employment and
earnings, accounting for endogeneity of the
location and timing of Wal-Mart openings that
most likely biases the evidence against finding
adverse effects of Wal-Mart stores. We address
the endogeneity problem using a natural '
instrumental variables approach that arises
from the geographic and time pattern of the
opening of Wal-Mart stores, which slowly spread
out from the first stores in Arkansas. The
employment results indicate that a War-Mart
store opening reduces county-level retail
employment by about 150 workers, implying
that each Wal-Mart worker replaces
approximately 1.4 retail workers. This
represents a 2.7 percent reduction in average
retail employment. The payroll results indicate
that Wal-Mart store openings lead to declines in
county-level retail earnings of about $1.2
million, or 1.3 percent. Of course, these effects
occurred against a backdrop of rising retail
employment, and only imply lower retail
employment growth than would have occurred
absent the effects of Wal-Mart.
Keywords: Wal-Mart; location; emplovment
(search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEt-codes: J21 R12 (search for similar items in
EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included
in nep-qeo and nep-ure
Date: 2007-01
2/7/10 12:01 PlI
s
,
~
LARGE ENOUGH TO SERVE YOU, SMALL ENOUGH TO CARE
Soon the Rohnert Park City Council will decide the fate of
Pacific Market in the Mt. Shadows Plaza.
The nearby WalMart wants to expand their store into a
WalMart Super Center. It clearly states in WalMart's EIR that
this will put Pacific Market out of business.
Because Pacific Market is local, they buy many of their
products and services from over 60 local or regional bus!nesses.
Over 60 regional businesses that support 4,291 local Jobs
will be affected if Pacific Market closes. We simply can't
afford to hurt our local economy and lose more local jobs.
Please tell your friends and neighbors to help SAVE
Pacific Market Let your City Council know that you care
about local businesses, local jobs and our regional economy.
1. Buying from local!}! owned businesses keeps your IIlOIlCiY draJlaUng
3 Urnes longer ht the Iood ~.
2. With that money. local businesses aeat.e the rnaJorIo/ of new Jobs.
3. local businesses are, by far. the best supporters of 00llIIIlUIlI!Y
profeds and non-prolIm.
4. Because they live here. local businesses provide the best customer
service and support.
5. Bl!}'ing local!}! helps protect the planet because fewer products are
shipped from far away places.
6. Most of all. supporting local business and products preserves
OUR unIQ!1e pIaoe, not just cookie-cutter Anyplace. USA
.,.' :',~'E"Ji:..y;;(,:
_,,"_~ . )~':I:,f>-.~..,;.,
, LOCAL
, ,si,;'o';;;~co~~tY ,
GO
LOCAL
Sonoma County
~
(t)
OQ
--
o
:::J
Po)
CT
C
(I)
--
:::J
(t)
(I)
(I)
(t)
(I)
0-
--
.,
(t)
n
rl
'<
Po)
~
n
rl
(t)
0-
CT
'<
rl
::::r
(t)
n
-
o
(I)
c
.,
(t)
o
-fo\
-0
Po)
n
--
::!)
n
:I
Po)
.,
S
rl
EXHIBIT 2
Company Employees
1 Affinity Signs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 Airgas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3 Alvarado Street Bakery. . . . . . . . . 116
4 Amy's Organics , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000
5 APL Bakery ...,............. 12
6 Avalon Natural Products ....... 100
7 Balletto. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
8 Bear Republic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .77
9 Becoming Independent . . . . . , . . 334
10 Bellweather Farms . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
11 Bennett Ridge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 12
12 Better Botanicals . . . . . , . . . . . . . 5
13 Big River Coffee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
14 Blood Bank of the Redwoods. . . . 120
15 Bohemian................... 17
16 BWC Natural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
17 Caltronics.............,..... 150
18 Castino Restaurant Supplies. . . . . 25
19 Clover Stornetta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
20 Cypress Grove Chevre , . . . . . . . . 39
21 Dynamic Nutraceutucals . . .. . . , 10
22 EO........................ 30
23 Franco American Bakery. . . . . . .37
24 Full Circle baking Company. . . . . 10
25 Gatti Nursery. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
26 Gipsons Golden. . .. ... . .. . . . .5
27 Guayaki Verba Mate. . . . . . . . . . . 36
28 Hanna Winery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
29 Hearts Desire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
30 J.M. Rosen's Cheesecake . . , . . . . 5
31 Kozlowski Farms . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
32 KZST......................16
33 La Tortilla Factory. . . . . . . . . . . . .215
34 Lagunitas................... 38
35 Laura Chenel's Chevre . . . . . . . . , 20
36 Marin French Cheese Co.. . . . . . . 21
37 McEvoy Ranch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
38 Minuteman Press. . . . . . . . , . . . . 9
39 Moresco Distributing Company. . 33
40 Neve Roses .. . . . . . . , . . . . , . . , 18
41 Petaluma Farms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
42 Planeteria................... 12
43 Point Reyes Cheese Company , . , 28
44 Redwood Hill Farm . . . . . , . . , , . 45
45 Rocky Natural Chicken . . . . . . . . 350
46 Rodney Strong. . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 145
47 Sebastiani................... 120
48 Sequoia Floral International. . . . . 30
49 ShiKai....,................. 27
50 Simplers................,... 8
51 Sprint Printing. . . , . . . . . . . . . . .5
52 Straus Family Creamery . . . . . . . . 56
53 Studebaker Cheesecakes . . . . , . . 3
54 Taylor Maid Farms, . . . . . . . . . . , 20
55 The Killer Baking Company. . , . . 2
56 The Tides Wharf. . . . . . , . . . . . . . 180
57 Traditional Medicinals. . . . . . . . , 102
58 Twin Hill Ranch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
59 Wildwood Natural Foods. . . . . . . 100
60 Willie Bird Turkeys. ..... .. ....24
61 Wine Country Cuisine,. . . , . . . . 5
TOTAL REGIONAL JOBS. . . . . . .4,291
Pacific Market Data
EXHIBIT 1
Subject: Pacific Market Data
From: "Mary Barragan" <maryb@pacificmkLcom>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb201009:12:44-0800
To: <eyler@econforensics,com>
Professor Eyler,
Here are the answers to the questions you asked:
l. Total employment at Pacific Markets in Rohnert Park to include the Store Manager and Assistant Store Manager is 50
employees;
2. Total employment at all three Pacific Markets including management is 156 employees;
3. Total weekly customer transactions at Pacific Markets in Rohnert Park is 8,000 per week;
4. Average employee pay at Pacific Markets in Rohnert Park (excluding Store Manager and Assistant Store Manager):
a Full-time employee average hourly wage ,is $17.74
b. Part-Time employee average wage is $12.13
c. All employees average hourly wage is $15.32
Please let me know if you have any further questions,
Mary Barragan I Human Resources Manager
Pacific Markets I 901 Golf Course Drive I Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Telephone: 707-585-9643 ext. 313 I Fax: 707-585-9123
Email: marvb@lpacificmkt.com
This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be
subject to the attorney-dient privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review,
copy or distribute this message. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete this message. Thank
you.
,fJ
213/109:26 AM
5. Cumulative Impacts - The cumulative analysis assumes 57,000 square feet of
new supermarket space, with 45,000 square feet comprising a new 45,000 square
foot supermarket in the Sonoma Mountain Village project of Rohnert Park. BAE
acknowledges on ErR Appendix H, page 46 that: "With the cumulative square
footage of supermarkets assumed here, amounting to 97,000 square feet of
supermarket or supermarket-equivalent space, more than one store might be at
risk of short-term closure, and one store might be at risk of long-term closure."
Considering that Target has already started constructing a full-grocery component
to its stores in Rohnert Park and south Santa Rosa (both of which are in the PTA
and neither of which was accounted for in the EIR), these cumulative impacts will
lengthen any re-tenanting of the Pacific Market to well beyond 2016, if ever,
References
California Department of Finance (2010) "E-6: Population Estimates and Components of
Change by County - July 1,2000-2009", Available HTTP
<<http://tinyur1.com/yzau28p>>, Accessed January 18,2010
City of Rohnert Park (2010) "General Plan" , Available HTTP
<<http://www.rpcitv.org/index.aspx?page=86>>, Accessed February 1,2010
Michael Brandman Associates (2010) "Rohnert Park Wal-mart Expansion Project:
Final Environmental Impact Report and Appendices" Available HTTP:
< <http://www . rpci ty .org/index.aspx?page=44 7> >
Neumark, David, Junfu Zhang and Stephen M. Ciccarella (2008) "The Effects ofWal-
mart on Labor Markets, Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2): 405-30
Volpe, Richard J. III and Nathalie Lavoie (2008) "The effect ofWal-mart supercenters on
grocery prices in New England", Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(1): 4-26
12
occupied by Pacific Market with another grocery store or another
type of use. Many major grocery store operators already have a
presence in the region and there is currently an overall shortfall in
demand for all types of retail spaces in Rohnert Park" (EIR
Appendix H, p. 44).
BAE also points out on EIR Appendix H's page 42 that "the trend
in the supermarket industry until recently has been toward larger
stores and consolidation," At approximately 34,000 square feet,
Pacific Market does not fit the profile of a conventional store.
2. Existing vacancies - On EIR Appendix H, page 47, BAE reports; "there is a
large overhang of vacant retail space in the area currently, approximately 10% or
higher based on the two brokerages tracking vacancies. In Rohnert ParklCotati
alone, this amounts to over 300,000 square feet of space2. While the market
might absorb most of the new space, this large amount of additional vacant space
makes it less likely that a specific supermarket space could be re-absorbed," In
EIR Appendix H's Cumulative Impacts analysis on page 49, BAE states;
"Cumulatively, the additional propos'ed supermarket space, along with the current
high vacancies combined with other planned projects coming online, could result
in a potential for long-term vacancy for a closed supermarket in Rohnert Park."
3. Leakage - As documented above, we estimate there is currently no food store
leakage from the PTA. Even assuming BAE's estimate of$8.8 million in
leakage, since BAE assumes Wal-Mart will capture the 25% share that would
flow to Rohnert Park, this would not leave any available leakage for Rohnert Park
supermarkets. Thus, there is no leakage to justify the re-tenanting of the Pacific
Market.
4, Population growth - On page EIR Appendix H, page 39, BAE conclude: "while
food stores might see a net loss in short-term sales following the store opening in
2011, these losses would be largely abated by 2016 due to increased demand due'
to modest population growth in the PT A". This statement needs careful
consideration. Since BAE used Claritas for its population estimates, we know
that between 20 1 1 and 2016 BAE estimates the PTA population will increase by
3,774, while population in the City of Rohnert Park will increase by just 600 - see
Exhibit 9. Since annual per capita food expenditures are about $3,100, this would
increase available food expenditures in the PT A by $11.7 million and in Rohnert
Park by just $1.9 million. Since the additional $1.9 million would accrue to the
benefit of all Rohnert Park stores, and since the Pacific Market has a very
"neighborhood" location, it is very unlikely that this modest growth in Rohnert
Park would entice any grocery store to re-open at this location.
2 The Rohnert Park retail vacancy has grown to 12% (the highest in Sonoma County) and 400,000 square
feet of vacant space in 4th qtr, 2009 - see Exhibit 8.
11
but it will create significant environmental and infrastructure costs, which have been
neither contemplated nor calculated.
Table 3: Pacific Market Trip Diversions
Pacific Market Total Trips per Year Annual
Shoppers to: # of Round trip Week Year Extra Hours
customers in miles
Wal-Mart 2,000 3.2 6,400 332,800 17,333
Raley's/Safeway 2,000 3.8 7,600 395,200 17,333
Oliver's 2,000 7.2 14,400 748,800 27,733
Combined Trips 2,000 0 0 0 0
Totals 8,000 NIA 28,400 1,476,800 62,399
Gallons of Gas (ZiJ 20 mpg 73,840
Cost to $3/gal 73,840 $221,500
diverted average
drivers
Urban decay evaluation
BAE has concluded in their July 2009 Economic Impact and Urban Decay Analysis for
the Wal-Mart expansion that the sales impacts from this expansion will result in the
closure of Pacific Market in Rohnert Park. However, BAE assumes the following:
"Assuming the economy recovers and growth resumes, these vacancies may resume
absorption by the time the Proposed Project opens and an additional supermarket vacancy
such as the Pacific Market space could be fe-tenanted to meet demand in the area" (EIR
Appendix H, pp. 44-45), The first problem with this statement is that the Proposed
Project is estimated to open in 2011, and since BAE has assumed the PTA will not grow
between 2009 and 2011, it would be unrealistic to assume that the Pacific Market space
would be re-tenanted.
More likely, BAE meant to imply that the Pacific Market space would be re-tenanted by
sometime after 2016 based on the following statement in the Draft EIR Appendix H's
page 41: "Even if the short-term losses led to closure of an existing supermarket, the
overall growth in demand after 2016 could allow for the potential re-tenanting by a
stronger competitor in a by (sic) that year" (underline added). However, based upon
comments in the BAE report, and the assumed growth of the PTA, it is clear from BAE's
own evidence that such a re-tenanting before 2016 is extremely unlikely. Here is the
evidence from the BAE and ErR reports.
1. Broker observations - BAE reports the following information concerning the
state of the leasing market.
"Local real estate brokers report that under current conditions, it
would be difficult to fill vacant supermarket space such as that
10
Develop a project that is consistent with the City of Rohnert Park General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance. - See comments above.
Generate tax revenues to accrue to the various agencies within the project area _
Because the expansion is for the purpose of adding a grocery component, almost all of
the $23.1 million in estimated new sales are food sales ($23.0 million). As mentioned in
the EIR's response to comments SCOTT-5, the existing Wal-Mart already sells health
and beauty aids, which typically constitute a large portion of a supermarkets taxable sales
(EIR, pp. 3-87:3-94), It is therefore anticipated that very few of the new food sales will
be taxable. As mentioned in previous comments, it is also anticipated that virtually all of
Wal-Mart's sales will come from existing stores operating within the PTA. Therefore,
the combination of most new sales being non-taxable and the likelihood that these sales
will consist of sales transferred from existing stores in the PT A, means that the expansion
will not generate any new tax dollars for agencies within the project area, To the extent
that Wal-Mart forces other retailers to lower prices to compete, there may actually be a
net reduction in sales. Since it is assumed that Pacific Market will close, there could also
be a decline in commercial property tax dollars at Mountain Shadows Plaza and other
locations if commercial foreclosures occur.
Minimize travel lengths and utilize existing infrastructure to the maximum extent
possible by expanding the existing Walmart store - The travel time analysis in the
Final EIR suggests that the travel time from 7 selected locations in northern Rohnert Park
is only slightly longer to Wal-Mart than Pacific Market, and if Pacific Market closes,
Wal-Mart will be closer than either Raley's or Costco (FEIR p.2-6). This type of
eomparison misses the primary point, which is, where will the 8,000 customers who
eurrently shop Pacific Market each week go to shop when Pacific Market closes?
Because Pacific Market serves a well-defined trade area where almost all their customers
have to pass near the Pacific Market store, it is reasonable to assume that the distance
between Pacific Market and a replacement market represents new travel distances and
times for Rohnert Park residents I. It is also reasonable to assume that these customer
trips will be diverted in equal numbers to Wal-Mart (because of proximity);
Safeway/Raley's (because of similarity and proximity); Olivers (because of similarity in
product and ambience); and those who will combine their former Pacific Market
shopping at another grocery store they also usually patronize, From Google maps we ean
calculate the distance between Pacific Market and the three other supermarket locations
together with the travel time - see Exhibit 7. This information is analyzed in Table 3
below.
Table 3 assumes 2,000 trips will be diverted to each of the following stores: Wal-Mart:
Safeway/Raley's and Olivers, This would result in 28,400 extra miles each week, or
1,476,800 per year. Assuming the average vehicle gets 20 mpg, this would consume
73,840 gallons of gas, which at $3,OO/gallon would cost these drivers $222,000/year.
These drivers would also spend 62,400 extra hours in their cars each year. Not only will
this create economic and personal hardship on these former Pacific Market customers,
I A recent tabulation 652 Pacific Market customer addresses found that 79% lived within one mile, and a
total of91% lived within the City of Rohnert Park.
9
There are two additional reasons why the injected food sales figure may be even higher.
First, BAE uses Sonoma County per capita figures as a benchmark even though BAE
shows per capita income for Sonoma County is 25% higher than income for the PT A,
$31,712 versus $25,336, respectively (EIR Appendix H, p. 12). BAE notes that
disposable income is a major factor influencing per capita food expenditures, so lower
per capita sales in the PT A compared to higher per capita sales at food stores would result
in greater injections (Ibid, p, 27). A second factor is that per capita food store sales have
been steadily declining in Sonoma County since 2001 as shown in BAE's Exhibit C-4
(Ibid, p. 56).
During this time frame, per capita food sales have fallen 14%, or about 2% per year.
While the recent economic slump has probably played a role, it is also likely that grocery
sales once spent at conventional grocery stores are now going to mass merchants like
Wal-Mart, Target and Costco. Assuming this trend continues, it will reduce sales at
classic grocery stores in the years ahead, thereby placing more grocery stores atrisk of
closure, In spite of this trend, BAE has held per capita food expenditures constant
through 2016 - the estimated fifth year following the anticipated opening ofWal-Mart in
2011.
Promote economic growth and development that is consistent with the policies of the
Rohnert Park General Plan- General Plan Goal LU-H requires that land use patterns
maximize residents' accessibility to neighborhood shopping centers (RP Gen~ral Plan, p.
2-28). Wal-Mart is in a regional location, and because it will add groceries resulting in
the closure of Pacific Market this makes Wal-Mart's use of this land for the sale of
groceries inconsistent with this Goal. Goal LU-7 is even more explicit, in that it
"encourage(s) new neighborhood commercial facilities to be located to maximize
accessibility to all residential areas". Furthermore, it goes on to state that the "intent is to
ensure that.... supermarkets.. ..are located close to where people live and facilitate access
to these on foot or bicycles." (Ibid., p. 2-30) If the expansion of the Wal-Mart was not
anticipated to close Pacific Market, an argument could be made that it is in compliance
with this Goal. However, by forcing the closure of Pacific Market, Wal-Mart will
effectively eliminate the only true, neighborhood-serving supermarket in this
neighborhood since 1985. As explained below, this will substantially increase customer
driving time; due to Wal-Mart's location on the west side of US 101 it will effectively
preclude biking or walking to the store for former customers ofPacifie Market. Finally,
this project is inconsistent with Rohnert Park's General Plan Objectives that include:
keep the city's small town feel; encourage local jobs; and, increase pedestrian and bike
access, Given that Wal-Mart is west of US 101, and all the population is to the east,
traveling to Wal-Mart by foot or bike is not an easy or safe option, Therefore, the Project
is not consistent with Goal TR-F: Encourage alternate modes of travel-including transit,
bicycles, and walking-by coordinating land use planning and development with
transportation and by promoting compact, mixed-use development in targeted areas (Ibid.
p. 4-9).
8
There is also a problem with the population estimates used by BAE. 2009 population
estimates for Rohnert Park, Cotati and Sonoma County are available at the California
Department of Finance (DOF) - www.dof.ca.gov. DOF reports a 2009 population for
Sonoma County of 490,231, while BAE assumes 473,426, based on data supplied by
Claritas. Using BAE data, total Sonoma County retail food sales are estimated at $1.513
billion ($3,230 x $473,426). If the DOF population estimate of 490,231 is used per
capita food sales drop to $3,119 ($1.513B divided by 490,231). Per capita sales of
$3,119 are less than the PT A per capita, which implies a net injection, not leakage. Table
2 below shows the Leakage Calculation Comparison in three steps, Step 1 shows BAE's
estimate from the Draft ErR Appendix H's Table 11 of an $8.8 million leakage. Step 2
corrects the benchmark (Sonoma County) per capita to $3,175, which reduces the leakage
to $4.0 million. Step 3 corrects the 2009 population using DOF data, resulting in a net
iniection of$3,5 million,
Table 2: Leakage Calculation Comparison
Step 1: BAE Original
Food Sales Per Capita
RPICotati
,PTA
Benchmark
SonomaCountv
$3,262
$3,128
$3,230
Per Capita Difference (PT A to Benchmark)
($102)
Leakage
($8,754,000)
Step 2: Benchmark Adjustment
$3,262
$3,128
$3,175
Per Capita Difference (PT A to Benchmark)
($47)
Leakage
($3,953,000)
Step 3: Population Adjustment
$3,262
$3,128
$3,087
$41
Per Capita difference (PTA to Benchmark)
Injection after Population Adjustment
$3,519,000
Population - Steps 1 & 2 50,034 85,827* 476,659
Population - Step 3 50,034 85,827* 490,231
* This number was 84,117 in BAE's Table 10, but then modified to 85,827 in Table 11.
7
Table 1: Variety Comparison
, Product Wal-Mart Pac Mkt Comments on Pac Mkt
Coffee 109 80 6 local brands are 85% of sales
Tea 79 325 25 different brands
Beer 71 250 60 local brands, largest selection in Rohnert Park
Wine 247 600 80% Sonoma and Napa wines
Cheese 189 350 50% local cheese
* The item count is by variety, not SKU - multiple sizes of the same item count as one variety
Provide a grocery store that meets the current unmet demand of consumers residing
within the market area. - In order to determine if food sales are leaving the PT A
(referred to as "leakage") or coming into the PT A (referred to as "injection"), BAE has
. estimated the total existing PT A food sales and compared this to the estimated food
expenditures from the PT A. These estimates are shown in Tables 10 and 11 (EIR
Appendix H, pp. 25, 28) of the DEIR, and indicate that in the years 2009/2011 there will
be a net annual "leakage" of food sales from the PT A of $8.8 million. The sources used',
and 'assumptions made to arrive at a determination of whether there is a "leakage" or an
"injection" are critical in determining if there is any unmet demand. In analyzing BAE's
methodology, we have discovered critical errors, omissions, and inconsistencies. These
are described below.
Throughout their report, BAE has used Claritas (a major data-gathering company, owned
by the Nielsen Company) as their sOll;rce for most of their demographic projections,
Claritas also provides a report available by zip-code areas called the "RMP Opportunity
Gap - Retail Stores". This report compares the demand (expenditures) and supply (sales)
by major retail categories. In their report for 2009, Claritas estimates Supermarket,
grocery sales in the PT A of $267 million, a figure that is almost identical to the estimate
used by BAE of $268.497 million as shown in Table 11 (EIR Appendix H, p, 28).
Clearly BAE agrees with Claritas on the 2009 sales of supermarkets in the PT A.
However, Claritas also indicates in their 2009 report that the expenditures ofPTA
residents for supermarket type items is only $150 million; this indicates that there is an
"injection" of food sales coming into the PT A of $117 million (see Exhibit 6). So instead
of an unmet demand ("leakage") of $8.8 million, Claritas estimates a $117 million
"injection" .
Rather than use the numbers developed by Claritas for estimating food expenditures,
BAE has used a different methodology and data source. But here again problems arise.
As shown in Tables 10 and 11 in Appendix H of the Draft EIR, per capita food sales for
Sonoma County (used as the "Benchmark Area") are allowed to increase from $3,175 in
2008 to $3,230 in 2009, while sales in the PTA are kept flat. Although the per capita
change is small, when multiplied by aPT A population of about 85,000 the consequences
are much greater, and serve the apparent purpose of creating more unmet demand.
6
Finally, consideration must be given to whether Wal-Mart's new job opportunities
replace jobs with better economic benefits. As deseribed in Exhibit 1, Pacific Market
pays their full time workers $17.47 per hour on average, while Wal-Mart states on their
web site concerning the Supercenter in Bakersfield that opened October 27,2009, that
Wal-Mart pays its full time California associates approximately $11.90, Using a 40 hour
work week, this equates to an annual, full-time wage at Wal-Mart of$24,750 versus
$39,900 at Pacific market, a difference of 61 %. This is consistent with a January 2004
study done by the Bay Area Economic Forum that concluded that Bay Area supermarket
wages were 59% better than Wal-Mart wages. The difference in the benefit package was
even more extreme, with Bay Area supermarkets contributing $7,57 per hour in benefits
versus $1.87 per hour for Wal-Mart- see Exhibit 4,
Provide the market area with an affordable shopping alternative to bring a wide
variety of products to Rohnert Park and surrounding communities. There is little
doubt that the grocery products sold at Wal-Mart will be affordable compared to most
eonventional retailers in the PTA. To reach its revenue goals, Wal-Mart'sSupercenter
expansion will use low pricing on a variety of goods as a classic strategy to attract
consumers. Volpe and Lavoie (2008) conclude that: 1) Wal-Mart Supercenters result in a
decrease in grocery prices between 6 and 7% for national brand goods at conventional
supermarkets competing within a radius_of5_miles fromthe-Supercenter. Theassociated
decrease in the priee of private label goods is between 3 and 8%; 2) the greatest impact of
Wal-Mart Supercenters, in terms of price decreases, is in the grocery and dairy
departments for both national brands and private labels; and 3) Wal-Mart Supercenters
price national brand and private label products significantly lower than conventional
supermarkets.
Because Wal-Mart is a large national retailer that uses price as its primary marketing tool,
most of its grocery products are sourced from major manufacturers who can provide Wal-
Mart volume and cost of goods required to meet its pricing and revenue objectives.
Except for its Great Value brand, the variety of grocery products carried by Wal-Mart is
likely to be less than what is offered at large chains like Safeway and Raley's and also
less in several products lines than what is offered at local stores like Oliver's and Pacific'
Market. As an example, Table 1 below shows the results of a comparison of certain
product categories at the Paeific Market in Rohnert Park versus the Wal-Mart
Supercenter in American Canyon; Exhibit 5 shows the raw data. This survey turned up
188 different coffee and tea items at Wal-Mart versus 405 at Pacific Market. Beer is
similar; there are about 71 types of beer at Wal-Mart compared to 250 at Pacific Market,
including 60 local brands. Pacific Market also stocks about 350 different cheese items, of
which 30% are from local producers, versus a selection of about 189 national cheese
products at the Supercenter. In fact, except for selected wines, no local brands were
found at Wal-Mart eompared to a many local brands found at Pacific Market. In short,
except for its private label and a few other items, an expanded Wal-Mart will not add to
the selection of existing brands already available in the PT A, while the closure of Pacific
Market will reduce ehoice among Rohnert Park stores, and especially for local products,
5
DETAILED FINDINGS
Proiect Objectives
There are 14 Projective Objectives listed in the EIR that are considered as justification for
the expansion of the Wal-Mart by approximately 40,000 square feet for the primary
purpose of adding a full grocery component. These Objectives are analyzed in more
detail below.
Create new job opportunities for local residents - The EIR states that Wal-Mart will
add 85 full and part-time jobs due to the expansion. Attached as Exhibit 1, is an e-mail
from Mary Barragan, Human Resource Manager for Pacific Market, indicating the
Pacific Market's Rohnert Park store employs 50 people, and the company has a total
employment of 156 at their three stores. The Wal-Mart expansion will close the Rohnert
Park store thereby eliminating 50 jobs. And, according to the October 22, 2009 letter
(included in the ErR) from Ken Silveira, President of Pacific Markets, if the Rohnert Park
store closes this will likely affect the viability of the other two Pacific Markets.
BAE estimates Wal-Mart will achieve annual food sales of$23.0 million. According to
Pacific Market management, the Rohnert Park store does about $10,0 million, 'So this will
leave $13 million that must come from other food stores, Assuming another store does
not close, the remaining stores will have to reduce employee headcount in order to keep
their labor percent in line with reduced volumes, This typically results in the layoff of
checkers, baggers and members of the stocking crew. While it is impossible to predict
with certainty the number oflayoffs, some educated assumptions can be made. Because
a food store with a total annual volume of $13.0 million has a payroll of about 60 full and
part time workers, it would be reasonable to assume that half of these employees would
be let go if the impaets were spread over several stores. This would result in the loss of
an additional 30 jobs, bringing the total job losses resulting from these direct impacts to a
minimum of80 and a high of 186, .
But there are other indirect impacts to consider. For example, Pacific Market deals with
many local vendors and suppliers, who provide not only product to the stores, but
services as well. Pacific Market estimates there are at least 61 of these firms providing
jobs that support approximately 4,291 local workers - see Exhibit 2. While most of these
firms have multiple business accounts, it is reasonable to assume that some jobs will be
lost, or hours cut such that full time workers become part timers. We would estimate
another 20 workers would be let go. Additional collateral damage would occur at the
Mountain Shadows Plaza where Pacific Market is located. We estimate several of the.
smaller businesses will close, creating the loss of another 5 jobs. In total. it is estimated
that 105 iobs will be lost, increasing the total to 211 if the other two Pacific Markets
.Qlose. The estimate of 105 job losses is consistent with a study by Professor David
Neumark that found that for every new Wal-Mart employee 1.4 existing jobs are lost-
see Exhibit 3.
4
Summary of Proiect Obiectives
The foregoing imlicatesthatmanyofthestatedProJect Objectives are mOre likely to
be detrimental to the City of RohnertPark, localhusiness owners and citizens ofthe
community. There is a g~l1eral belief that most projects are beQ-eficial~nd that
retailers like Wal-Martprovideeconomic stability to a cOll1Ii:1un'ity~. Whilethi~ may
be true under certain circumstances, this proJectwill clearly have many specific and
. unintended consequences that will cancel oufthe perceivedbtmefits. E:l~cJed
officials need to be fully.informed about the consequences ofthisproject.
Urban DecavEvaluation
With regard tothe iss.ueofurban decay; our, review of the data' contained in the
BAE analysis suggests there is little reason to believe tbere willbesufficient demand
to support a re-temmting.ofthePacificMarketby2016 - the year. at which BAE,
cOncludes anothersupermarkettenanhvHI be found.T~eprin'cjpal rea~ons are:'
1) , According toBAR's contacts withJocal reaItors, ihere are 110 maj Or ,supermarket
retailers looking for spaceoftbis size afthi~type ofIocati~n;
2) BAE estimates' there are 300,000 square feet c>fvacant retail in Rohnert.
Pnk/Cotati that "makes it less Iikdya~pecific sUperm~rket spac~could. be re,:
"'absorbed'7;
. ,
. .., . ,
" -. .
3) Tijere actually is no"leakag~":fr.~m the RohnertParklCotatifuarketthat would
supporfthe addition of another supermarket eitbernowQrby2016; ".,
" ,,-, .;. i',' :..' -'," ,_", ,_ '_.., ,_ _.".
4)Claritas (thedatasour~efirmusedhy BAE) estimates thepoplllationin thePTA
,\yillgr()wby3,774bertveen 2009 and 2016. With annual.per capitafo()d '.'
expenditures ofabolIt$3,100, tbis\vouldyieldtotalnew annual foo~lsales of$1l.7
million; spread ,oyer tbeentirePT A. RAE estimates the RohnertJ?arkpopulatioll,
which coriIpri~es,thebulk ofthe<Pacific Market's trade are~,wiII only inc,reaseby
600 people, representing just $1.9 milliouin newfood~ales. ' . <".
,S)A new foodstote'()f45,OQOsqu~refeetisproposed :forsoutljeastRohnertPark,
and Targeti~curr,entlyaddinga full grocery componenftotheir Rohllert Park,
,store, as well as theirstore ill south Sal1faR.osa(~Tact notcon~empla.ted by the
EIR);' these events Will certainly consume' all of the sales potential generated by the
growthoffhePTAthrough '2016~ ' ',.' ,
It is thereforeverv'unlikelvthat anotlIer supermarket can be found to replace
Pacific Marketbv 2016~ifever" ' ,," , , " ',',' , .,"', . "
P, rovid,e a store tliat, W" illllleefthe unmet demand o,f' consumers in themarke, tarea.
The EIR estimates there is a current unmet demand (called "leakage") of food sales from
thePTA of$8.8 million., In reviewing the methodology used td supportthis assumption,
wefollnd'several;'whencol1'ected, the conclusion is reversed from a "leakage" into 'an
"injection" of $35 million, This means that most, if not all, of Wal.,. Mart' sestimated
increased sales following the expansion will c.ome at the expense of existing PTA
retailers.
Promote growth that is consistent with the policies of the City of RohnertPark's
General Plan. ' . " " " ,
'General Plan Goals LU- Hand L U -.7, call for the. City, to "maint<!-in land use patterns that
maximize residents' accessibility to.. ..neighborhood shopping eel1ters,"and to "ensure
that ',' ,.s,upe,rmarke"ts are located, close to where peop",leliv,eand facili"ta, ,te acee, ss to th,' ,e, se
on foot or bicycle." (RP Qeneral Plan; pp. 2:.28, 2'-30)PacifieMarketoperatesinatrue
neighborhood (as opposedto regional)shoppingctmter at a 10cat~onJhathasexistedsirtce
1985, Theclosure,ofPacific Market is contrary to these policies, as it will significantly
inereasegroceryshoppingtravel timefor residents within onel11ile pfthestoreand "
, 'preclude travel onfoot orbicyc1e. It is also inconsistent with Rohnert Park's General'
Plan Objectives that include: keeptheeity'ssmalltown feel;eneouragelQcal}obs; and,
" incre(ise pedestrian andbikeaceess.
Generate tax revenues: . ,',,' ,", ' , " '" " '. " ',', ,.' '
Because theexpansion is for thepufPoseof adding a grocerycomponent,almostall of .
,th,e,$,,23.1, m,il,lio,n in", "est,i,m""" a, t, e, dn,ew, s,a,l"esare fi, ood.sa,les ($". 23.0",mil,lio, n,Y,:S"ince, " fi"o,o,d".sa, "l,..es
are ty,p"ica,l,lyn,on-,',tax,a"ble (e, x,cept fi, or, cle,an,il1,g"aids an,dhe,' alth,an,dbe,."autyp, ,r, 0, d, u.ct,salrea,dy,'.
carried at the existing \V al- Mart), and because the increase inW al- Mart' ssales will corrie'
. from a ,transfer ofsalesat~xistinggroeerystores,theWal-Martexpansionwill not; ;"
'gererate any newsales tax dollars. , In fact, to the extentWal-M:artforces other retailers
to lowerp, rices in order to compete, there, m(iY actually be a net reduction in sales taxes.
. ,
Minimize travel lengths. '..., ,", ",'. . " ',', '. ...,", ,,' ',' ,.
The travel time analysis containedinthe FEIR(p. 2~6) suggests thatthetravel time from
sevenseleeted locations in northemRohnert Park is pnlyslightly 10ngerto>Wal'-Mart
',' than Pacific Market, and ifPacifieMarket closesWal-MaltwilLbe closer than either
~aley's orCostco. This missesthernainpoint,whichishow much {wiher wiUthe'
, current cilstomers of Pacific Market have to traveL when PaciticMarket closes~ 13asedon
. theanalysiscontainedinthe"DetailedFindings'" section. ofthisreport,weestimate the .
combined CQstto.,customers ng\V shopping at Pacific N{arketwill beane?<tra2$AOO ,
". driving miles a week" or1 ,477,000 miles a year consuming at least 73,840 gallons of fuel
at a cost of approximately $222;000 per year, while, addingovet 62,000 hours of drive
time ayear. Air quality issues and extra infrastructure costs flow fronUheseadditional
trips. Moreover, since th~,majqrityofRohnertPark'spoPlllation lives east of US 101,'
traveling to, Wal-Mart' s location by foot or bicycle isnotaneasy()rsafe .option,
Econonlic Impact Analysis
Wal- martExpansion
RohnertPark~ CA '
'RobertEyler, Ph.D,
Ptofessor
'Sonoma State University
March 5, 2010
, , .
The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the economic evidence presented in the Final
. . Env,ironm, ental Jmpa, ct Report,' ',(FE, ' JR) for the expansion oftheRohnert ParkWal..Mart to
. -, - .' - - .
include a fllllgrocery component. TheFEIR added responses' and more information to
the Draft EIR(EIR). The EIl{Was preparedbyMichael BrandmanAssociates with the
Economie' Impaet . and Urban Decay'. Analysis ,prepared by Bay Area Economics, (BAE).
This urban decay analysis ,begins on page 429 of Appendix Hint he l)raftEIR. ,The
. ,f~)cushereisbI1 the.13IR' s conclusions concerning a number of thel'roj~ctive Qbjectives'
along. with the validityofthe'concIusions reachedby BAE in theireconotni~ impact
. analysis. ' . '
~r~atejob9PPoJ;tunitiesJbrlocalresidents., ' . , .
, , ,t~eEIRstatesthe~Wal-MClitexpansiQn will add 85newfull-tiIl1eand'part4irne jobs.
, Our analysis concludes tIiatbetween 105 and 211jobswill be lostbylocal~mployers, ,
and that the quality of thesejobs, in terms of pay and benefits, will also decline. '
. BriIlg,awid~ variety.ofIU'oducts;
While the EIRdoes n?tprovide any specifics to support their conclusiors, our analysis
suggests just the opposite. Except forWal-Mart's private-label br'ands,almostaJlgrocery "
productscariied by Will- Mart are available at existing grocery stores in the ; primary trade
.,area{PT A)~ ,However" because this expansion will close the Pacific Marketin Rohnert
<Pfirk:l this willactuallywdllcepro,ductselection amongRohnertPark gtocerystores;'
, Pa~lficMarket carries marly-unique prqducts, inclllding many Iocally-prodi.lCedgoods.
, . . , ..
1'l1e EIR: lists 14 Project Objectives. These Objectives set forth'certain goals fOf the .
project and establish theover-arphingrea~onswhytIie expaI1sionsllOuldbeaPI)rov~d., In
a numbetofcases,however,thereareotherfact6rs to beconsidered,.TIieseconcern '
possible countervailing impacts the.expansion will have on l?cal residents, businesses,
the City of Rohnert Park, atldsurroundi!ig'commtinities. A number of these 14 Project
Objectives can bequantWablymeasured; andtheseare examined in,moredet~ilin the
boqyof this report, 'Ihepurp9seofthiseyaluation is' to provide 'Rohnert Parkpolicy
makers witl1additioilal facts c,onceI11ing the fOllowing Project Objectives.
" '.'. ,. -. ", ',' ,- '" . - ", ,.' . . '-,
" .- " -,'-.' - .
.~
S'ONOMA
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS
Department of Economics
STATE UNIVERSITY
1801 East Colati Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928-3609
707.664.2366 · Fax 707,664.4009
RECEIVED
MAR 0 8 2010
--""'~-'~'"
'\''(O';JCil:
:.._,.~.tviTscellaneous
t" '-"COmmunications
!"-~-'i\<).:;:nda
~,,,':''';'-,'<-l1t. -p~
OIYOFROHNERT PARK
~J _~..,~.,.....,...?..
'.,
',. .
March 5/ 2010
Judy Hauff, City Clerk
City Hall, 130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Phone: (707) 588-2227
Fax: (707) 792-1876
Email: jhauff@rpcity,org
Ms. Hauff:
Please accept the attached report on the Rohnert Park Wal-mart expansion to a
Supercenter as part of the information used by the Rohnert Park Planning Commission in
making their decision. Ken Silveria of Pacific Market contracted me to write this report and
critique of the EIR's findings. Please distribute to the Planning Commission and anyone else
within the Rohnert Park City government you see fit, Thank you.
Sincerely,
~~
Robert Eyler, Ph.D.
Chair, Economics Department
Director, Center for Regional Economic Analysis Sonoma State University
1801 East Cotati Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928-3609
eyler@sonoma.edu
(707) 664-4256
THE CAlifORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Bakersfield · Channel Islands · Chico · Dominguez Hills · East Bay · Fresno · Fullerton · Humbaldf . Long Beach . Los Angeles . Maritime Academy
Monterey Bay · Northridge · Pomona · Sacramento · San Bernardino · San Diego. San Francisco · San Jose. San Luis Obispo. San Marcos. Sonoma . Stanislaus
r-'
J......-.... .-- :t",;
NO WAl-MART
SUpiERCENIER!
1. Pacific Market, a local, neighborhood market will close and the Mountain Shadow Shopping Center in, the
northeast section of Rohnert Park will become blighted with many shuttered storefronts, Over 60 local vendors that do
business with Pacific Market will be directly impacted,
.................................................... ...... ,. ...................... ............. ............. .............................. .~.............. ......................... ...... ........ ...................... .....................~...~..
2. Rohnert Park will become a Wal-Mart Town with much fewer shopping choices, Raley's, Safeway, Food Maxx,
and Oliver's will face stiff competition from the super center. Local florists, nurseries, and hardware stores will also
suffer.
..................................................... ..... ......... ............................~...... ...... ......................................................... ....... ................................. .....................................
3; The dtywill gain little additional tax revenue because the expansion of the store is mainly for nontaxable
food items and the super center will steal sales tax revenue from other local grocers. The project will not generate
significant new revenues tosupport public recreation and city swimming pools, or police and fire services.
.....n........................................................................................................................................~...................................................................................................
, ,
4; Wal~Mart is a welI~known low wage employer and less than half of the Wal-Mart employeeswillhaveeniployer
providedhealthbenefits. Good jobs at Pacific Market and other local grocery stores will be lost, and the public will pay
the bills for Wal-Mart workers who will rely on local emergency medical services and public clinics for health care,
.............4....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. The super center will significantly increase the traffic congestion in the Wilfred/Golf Course ipferchange
causing delays and more accidents,
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
6, Greenhouse gas emissions .will increase as local groceries close and shoppers from across the region drive to the
super store for cheaper groceries and retaiL
.............................................~.....uu..........................................................................................................................................................................................
"
7. TheWal-Mart super center located right off Highway 101 with 24-hour operations and a huge parking lot will
increase crime, endanger shoppers and add to public costs for police services.
................-...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
8, The benefits of the super center will be dwarfed by the actual costs of this project. Profits from Wal-Martwill
be sent back to Arkansas and very little will recirculate in our local economy.
Labor and Materials Donated by SEIU 1021
Sonoma (,..uunty Consc~ti,on i\qlo,Il
540 Pacific AVf::flllC' Sanm RoS$,C.tt9!i4Q.'3
(707) 57}.8566 -[ax(707) 571~h'i78
SC:CA@conseryationactiQn.otg
StlnlHll<l (0[111('; (Of1If:l<'JUOn lH (j,)f\
G,,',',',,', 0,.0" .".~,.,er, V,.,.""..,8""...,I".., i. 0",.,.,..".0"",.,' .",.."",jll, .,.C,.,.li"".o".o,A,lerl
JUSI Sav NO 10."Wa...Molt SuperSlore , Expansioll
...U......................................H.......U~...........................................................................................................,..................................................................................................
Who opposes the Wal-Mart Supercenter?
A coalition of commuruty organizations has formed to oppose the supercenter that includes: Living Wage
Coalition of Sonoma County, Go Local Sonoma County, Sonoma County Conservation Action, North Bay
Labor Council, Sonoma County Conservation Action, and the California Healthy Communities Network.
.....................................................................................................................................h.~.....................................u.................................................................................
Take Action Now:
Urge the City ofRolmert Park to reject this unnecessary Wal-Mart expansion that offers
few benefits to the community!
Points to include:
· Let them know that you are AGAINST Wal-Mart's proposed expansion.
· Tell them to deny the EIR due to its inadequacies, including economic blighting,
store closures, and traffic.
· Encourage the council to support local retail and grocers, and a network of small
regional vendors which employ 4,000 local residents.
· Ask them to keep you up to date on this issue.
Attend the upcoming planning commission alid city council meetings (exact date will be posted
at: http//:www.livillgwagesolloma.org)
Send letters to:
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Rohnert Park City' Council
c/o City Hall
6750 Commerce Blvd, Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Fax: [707] 588-2263 or Email care of Beth Lidster at blidster@rpcity,org
City Council Contact Information:
Gina Belforte, Vice Mayor Pam Stafford, Mayor
(707) 588-2226 (707) 584~5892
Email: GBelforte@rpcity,org Email: pstafford@rpcity.org
Joseph Callinan Jake Mackenzie
(707) 588-2226 (707) 584-1195
jcallinan@rpcity.org jmackenzie@rpcity.org
Amy Breeze
(707) 217-3795
Email: ABreeze@rpcity,org
..................................~..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Please leave your letter in a stamped and addressed envelope under your doormat by 8:30 pni
tonight. Our Field Organizer will pick it up, plus any extra stamps and envelopes are always
appreciated! Thank you for making your voice heard! www.conservationaction.org
~,~ < ,,,: .. ~.::.'
gain in jobs, and the quality oravaJlable jobs decreases. Wal-Mart ,
workers are among the "working poor", who receive subsidies from
taxpayers because they don't get paid a living wage. Wal-Mart
"associates" receive extremely low wages - so low that most of these
employees (the "working poor" of America) depend on public
assistance for food stamps or health care or housing or child:-care or
other basic necessities. Thus Wal-Mart's low prices are deceptive... the
tax-paying public is, in effect, subsidizing these prices.
Wal-Mart is extremely hostile to unions. One effect, therefore, of
allowing Wal-Mart to expand would be that good middle-class jobs
are replaced by poverty-wage jobs.,
There is no enhancement of tax revenues to the local jurisdiction since
groceries are not subject to sales tax in California. Rohnert Park, like
many other local jurisdictions, is suffering now from budgetary short-
falls. In such times it may be appealing to consider bringing in a large
retailer in order to rake in expected sales-tax revenues. Groceries are
non-taxable in California. However, to the extent that some additional
taxable items would be sold inan expanded store, it wOlJldbe a
Faustian bargain. E)(perience<suggests that Wal-Mart has no scruples
about getting cities to offer them enticements and then selling them
out.
Many local suppliers to local-oriented markets would be adversely
affected by the presence of a Wal-Mart,which by and large uses
national or even international suppliers. The money they take in does
not stay in the local economy.
Finally there is the issueofThirdWorldsweatsh()ps where goodssojd,
in Wal....Martsare manufactured. There isan ethical issue about
supporting the expl.oitation oflow-wage'workers in other countries.
Low astheirpricesare, Wal....Mart has forced its suppliers (many inthe
Third World) to provide goods to it at even lower prices. Thus, some of
the richest people in the world are Waltons.
As citizens, we owe itto ourneighbors in this city who have small
struggling businesses not to letthis cut-throat competitor drive them
out of business - whichWal-Mart hasa history of dOing.
Reference: "See Operation Rollback: Wal:":'Mart's World of Business"by
JEFFERSON DECKER, a review of Nelson Lichtenstein's book "The Retail
Revolution: HowWal-Mart Created a Brave New World of Business" in
"TheNation", 5 October 2009
California Faculty Association, Sonoma State University Chapter
Resolution
RECEIVED
MAR 0 5 2010
February 2010
Be It Resolved:
crry OF
ROH~'.jERT PA!:tK
That the California Faculty Association, Sonoma State University
Chapter, opposes the expansion of the Rohnert Park Wal-Mart into a
SuperCenter because of the adverse effect this expansion will have on
the community in which Sonoma State University is located, including
a deterioration in the quality of jobs available locally. Furthermore, the
Chapter strongly urges the Rohnert Park City Council not to approve
Wal-Mart's proposal to expand.
Rationale:
Shoppers from all over Sonoma County are extolling the benefit of
having a Wal-Mart SuperCenter selling groceries in Rohnert Park. The
benefit is simple: low prices. The trade-offs are much more complex _
- and far outweigh the benefits. Low price comes at a high cost.
There are many reasons to be concerned with the presence of a Wal-
Mart in our community, especially an even larger one than exists now.
Wal-Mart isa mega-corporation that is fully capable of destroying a
local economy, that pays its employees poverty-level wages, that
actually encourages its employees to apply for food stamps and other
taxpayer-supported programs for the poor, that puts pressure on its
third-world suppliers, that is viciously anti-union, etc.Wemust'
educate our community about it. Sure they haveJow prices, and lower-
income shoppers probably like having a Wal-Mart nearby. But we must
consi.der how Wal-Mart achieves its low prices,andthe potentially
disastrous consequences of a SuperCenter in our comm.unity.
In Cotati/Rohnert Park, a Wal-Mart SuperCenter will undoubtedly mean
driving some local markets out of business (e.g., Pacific Market,
Oliver's Market), and bringing the attendant blight to the shopping
centers which they anchor. Across the nation, on the average two
grocery stores fold in a community for every Wal-MartSuperCenter
that goes in. Shopping centers that these grocery stores anchored
tend to enter decline, and urban blight increases. TheSuperCenter, of
course, does .create jobs, although they are predominantly 'Junk jobs".
The net effect on the community is a decided negative. There is no net
':I...
I)
0'
.'\<\
~
'"
c
'" 0
::s .';:
o (':l
<l.l U
C .-
~S (':l .
v ~ ,"'0
~ '~' E 5 0 0
0- .- 0 en ~ .......
g~u<(;>.;>.
::l 0. 0.
o 0 0
U liu
Lidster Beth
, .U"',.
.. ';~~.'11,;11.
From: KEITHCA V ASSO [keithcavasso@comcast.net] , VI iscellaneous
,
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 10:40 AM r ..- Communications X'
,
To: Lidster, Beth :--- Agenda
Subject: Walmart \~~~,~py to: }k, P~-mr ~
L.::,_vpy to: '
Ms. Lidster,
To have the city council pass the expansion of Walmart will be a grave mistake. We live in the G
section and I have been supporting Pacific Market since they opened as Hoger Wileo.We need them
and those people who work there need to keep their jobs. Pacific Market also supports their
employee's unlike Walmart. NO EXPANSION and NO MORE TRAFFIC!!!'"
I know mall my neighbors feel the same!!
Thank You,
Keith Cavasso
1
Lidster, Beth
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Creighton Bell [CREIB@SBCGLOBAL.NET]
Saturday, February 27,20104:53 PM
Stafford, Pam; Belforte, Gina; Breeze, Amie; Callinan, Joseph; Mackenzie, Jake; Admin
Creighton Bell
budget crisis & fiscal responsibility
Honorable Representatives,
Today I received in the mail an expensive mailer from the city manager regarding the city's financial
challenges. I think the city should not have spent the money on this brochure!
I think the city should have saved the money, and communicated with us through our utility bills!
On the city's website is this statement regarding your fiscal responsibility:
"Although Rohnert Park has demonstrated prudent fiscal stewardship and has been able to balance the
budget,...-our City faces a severe budget deficit and fiscal crisis."
If members of the council approved this piece, they should be removed from office. If this is the entirely
the city manager's doing, he should be fired!
Creighton Bell
Rohnert Park
1
Lidster, Beth
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kr Tambo [ktambornini@hotmail.com]
Saturday, February 27,201012:30 PM
Stafford, Pam; Admin
RP Fiscal Challenges Flyer
Mayor Stafford:
I received the flyer re the fiscal crisis, and had some questions which it did not quite address, as follows:
1. The flyer mentions how the crisis has affected public safety, but does not address other city departments services, I
am sure this information is available somewhere, but it would be helpful for a reference included to the sources where
citizens could get more information,
2, The flyer makes a general statement but no specifics on number of officer/firefighter positions already cut, nor how RP
staffing and service levels in these areas compares with other agencies, I am sure this information is also available, but a
reference on where citizens could find this would be useful.
3. The pie chart re: where the money goes lists 'Other' and 'General Govt' categories, and I would like to be able to look
these up to see more specific information on the services included in these general expenditure categories.
4, The flyer identifies negotiated salary reductions that have occurred, but does not identify what bargaining groups and
departments participated in reductions, I would like to know whether all departments and services are being cut equitably,
and which have agreed to voluntary pay reductions,
No one can question that this economic downturn is a tough and serious issue, which has affected so
many individuals, local cities and households. That is why I feel it is important for everyone to show good faith by
participating in the solution. The information on how the cuts have affected all departments, how the departments have
been affected by and participated in reductions, and the specific services the Council is planning to commit funds if the
sales tax increase were approved should be advertised and available to voters before the election.
I would like to see these funds distributed equally to preserve a balanced and vibrant community, including Community
Development (Building and Planning services), Public Works, Parks and Rec services and Public Safety jobs that serve or
community, so that we retain roads and infrastructure in tact (e,g" serviceable roads for residents and emergency
services), that development and growth can be pursued and well planned, and that people can still get out and enjoy
parks and rec services even if in a limited capacity, Lastly, future flyers may also want to mention volunteer opportunities,
as perhaps we may have some retired officers in our community that would like to serve as reservists, or others with other
experience that would like to serve as volunteers to help bridge the gap during this tough economic time,
I would appreciate this being shared with the Council.
Thank you,
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
1
City of Rohnert Park
03/09/1 0 Agenda
Item No. 13
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
March 9, 2010 Meeting
1,
2.
3,
4,
5,
6,
7.
PG&E
Ann Derby
Janice Wright
Sherrie Foster
Dennis Wal
Katie Ernest
Elizabeth Burch, Ph,D,
Application to provide summer 2010 rate relief
Opposed to closing Performing Arts Center
Opposed to closing Performing Arts Center
Opposed to closing Performing Arts Center
Opposed to Walmart expansion
Opposed to Walmart expansion
Opposed to Walmart expansion
3/01/10
2/23/10
2/23/10
2/23/10
2/09/10
2/25/10
3/03/10
Communications Distributed at meeting (3/09/10)
8, Kr, Tambo Budget questions for Council 2/27/10
9. Creighton Bell Budget Crisis 2/27/10
10, Keith Cavasso Opposed to Walmart expansion 3/05/10
11. Robert Eyler, Ph.D. Walmart EIR Critique 3/05/10
12. Mary Finnie/Resident Opposed to Walmart expansion 3/05/10
"