2011/09/27 City Council Agenda Packet
City Clerk's Archive
City Hall
City of Rohnert Park. 130 Avram Avenue. Rohnert Park, California 94928
PHONE: (707) 588-2227. FAX: (707) 792-1876 . WEB: www.rvcitv.org
ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
Community Development Commission
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, September 27,2011
Joint Regular Meeting - Open Session: 5:00 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBER
130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California
The Rohnert Park City Council welcomes your attendance, interest and
participation at its regular city meetings scheduled on the
2nd and 4th Tuesdays of each month at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber.
City Council/CDC/RPFA Agendas and Minutes may be viewed at tlte City's website:
www.rvcitv.orf!
Council/CDC/RPFA may discuss and/or take action on any or all of the items listed on this agenda.
If you challenge decisions of the City Council, the Community Development Commission, or the
Rohnert Park Financing Authority of the City of Rohnert Park in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearing(s) described in this Agenda, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Rohnert Park at, or prior to the public hearing(s).
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or
other person to assist you while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City
Clerk's Office at (707) 588-2225 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements
for accommodation by the City. Please make sure the City Clerk's Office is notified as soon as
possible if you have a visual impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another
format (Braille, audio-tape, etc.)
PUBLIC COMMENTS: For public comment on items listed or not listed on the
agenda, or on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time (limited to three
minutes per appearance and a 30 minute total time limit, or allocation of time based
on number of speaker cards submitted)
- PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING -
*SEE NOTE AT THE END OF THIS AGENDA
Copies of all staff reports and documents subject to disclosure that relate to each item of business referred to on the
agenda are available for public inspection Thursday before each regularly scheduled Ci~ Council meeting at City
Hall, located at 130 A vram A venue. Any writings or documents subject to disclosure that are provided to all, or a
majori~ of all, of the members of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda has been
distributed will also be made available for inspection at Ci~ Hall during regular business hours.
ANNOUNCEMENT: Please turn off all pagers, cellular telephones and all
other communication devices upon entering the Council Chamber because of
electrical interference with the sound recording and TV broadcast systems.
5:00 p.m.
1. CITY COUNCIL, CDC & RPFA JOINT REGULAR MEETING - Call to Order/Roll Call
(Ahanotu _ Callinan_Mackenzie _ Stafford _ Belforte3
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Led by Pratiksha Sharma, 6th grade student from Marguerite Hahn Elementary School
3. SSU STUDENT REPORT
By Amanda Burke, Sonoma State University Associated Students, Inc. (SSU ASI) Legislative
Representative
4. PRESENTATIONS
A. Mayor's Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of October as Domestic
Violence Awareness Month
B. Mayor's Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming October 9-15, 2011, as 2011 Fire
Prevention Week
C. Mayor's Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming October 5, 2011, as International
Walk and Roll to School Day in Rohnert Park
5. CITY MANAGER / CITY ATTORNEY / DEPARTMENT HEAD BRIEFINGS
This time is set aside for City Staff to present a verbal report to the Council on the activities
of their respective departments. No action may be taken except to place a particular item on a
future agenda for Council consideration.
A. 1 st Annual Art and Music Festival Update
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item or on City business not
listed on the Agenda may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes.
Those wishing to address the Council on any report item listed on the Agenda should submit
a "Speaker Card" to the City Clerk before announcement of that agenda item.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the consent calendar will be considered together by one action of the City
Council, the Community Development Commission, and/or the Rohnert Park Financing
Authority, whichever is applicable, unless any Council Member or anyone else interested in a
consent calendar item has a question about the item.
A. Approval of Minutes for:
1. City Council/CDC/RPFA Joint Regular Meeting - September 13,2011
B. Acceptance of Reports for:
1. City Bills/Demands for Payment dated September 27, 2011
2. CDC Bills/Demands for Payment dated September 27,2011
3. City Cash/Investments Report for Month Ending July 2011
4. CDC Cash/Investments Report for Month Ending July 2011
5. RPFA Cash/Investments RepOli for Month Ending July 2011
C. City Council Resolutions for Adoption:
1. 2011-89 Authorizing the Submittal of an Application to Designate Central Rohneli
Park as a Priority Development Area
2: 2011-90 Authorizing and Approving an Agreement with North Fork Environmental,
Inc. dba North Fork Associates for Planning Consulting Services
3. 2011-91 Awarding the Purchase ofa Harben Unit for the Public Works Department
D. CDC Resolution for Adoption:
1. 2011-07 Adopting an Amended Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule Pursuant to
Section 34169(g) of the California Health and Safety Code
8. CITY/CDC ITEM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CONTINUATION
ORDINANCE AND REMITTANCE AGREEMENT
Consideration of (1) adopting Ordinance No. 839 determining to comply with the Alternative
V oluntary Redevelopment Program pursuant to Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California
Health and Safety Code in order to pelmit the continued existence and operation of the
Rohnert Park Community Development Commission; and (2) approving and authorizing
execution of a Remittance Agreement between the Community Development Commission of
the City of Rohnert Park and the City of Rohnert Park Pursuant to Health and Safety Code
Section 34194.2
A. Staff Report
B. Public Comments
C. Ordinance for Adoption: Waive Full Reading and Adopt Ordinance by Reading Title:
1. No. 839 Ordinance of the City of Rohnert Park Determining to Comply with the
Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Pursuant to Part 1.9 of
Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code in Order to Permit
the Continued Existence and Operation of the Community Development
Commission of the City of Rohnert Park
a. Council motion/discussion/roll call vote
D. City Council Resolution for Adoption:
1. 2011-92 Approving and Authorizing Execution of a Remittance Agreement
between the City and the Community Development Commission of the
City of Rohnert Park Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34194.2
a. Council motion/discussion/vote
E. CDC Resolution for Adoption:
1. 2011-08 Approving and Authorizing Execution of a Remittance Agreement
between the Commission and the City of Rohnert Park Pursuant to Health
and Safety Code Section 34194.2
a. CDC motion/discussion/vote
9. STREETLIGHT UPDATE
Consideration of streetlight life cycle cost analysis and streetlight alternatives.
A. Staff Report
B. Public Comments
C. Council discussion/direction
10. SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND (SLESF)
Consideration of approving the Fiscal Year 2011-12 California Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Expenditure Plan to continue supplemental funding for
the salary and benefits for an anti-gang enforcement officer.
A. Staff Report
B. PUBLIC HEARING
C. City Council Resolution for Adoption:
1. 2011-93 Approving the 2011-12 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund
Expenditure Plan
11. CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
Consideration of nomination and appointment to the Cultural Alis Commission for one two-
year term expiring December 31, 2012.
A. Staff Report
B. Public Comment
C. Council nomination/discussion/action
12. MAYORS' AND COUNCILMEMBERS' ASSOCIATION APPOINTMENTS
Consideration of supporting letters of interest for appointments to the following vacancies by
the Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association Board of Directors on October 13,2011
A. North Bay Division, League of California Cities Executive Board: Two two-year terms.
B. Sonoma County Child Care Planning Council: One three-year term.
13. STANDING COMMITTEE / AD HOC COMMITTEE / LIAISON REPORTS
This time is set aside to allow Council members serving on Council committees or on
regional boards, commissions or committees to present a verbal report on the activities of the
respective boards, commissions or committees on which they serve. No action may be taken.
A. Standing Committee Reports
B. Liaison Reports
1. Senior Citizens Advisory Commission meeting, 9/15 (PS)
2. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) Board of Directors meeting, 9/21 (JM)
3. Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors meeting, 9/21 (PS)
4. Russian River Watershed Association Board of Directors meeting, 9/22 (JM)
C. Other Reports
1. League of California Cities Annual Conference, 9/23 (GB)
14. COMMUNICATIONS
Copies of communications have been provided to Council for review prior to this meeting.
Council Members desiring to read or discuss any communication may do so at this time. No
action may be taken except to place a particular item on a future agenda for Council
consideration.
15. MATTERS FROM/FOR COUNCIL
A. Scheduling of City Council Special Meeting for Strategic Plan Workshop on Saturday,
November 5, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.
1. Council discussion/direction
B. Scheduling of future agenda item related to authorization for City Manager to approve
annual requests from Reverend Samuel Tharpe for $500 contribution to Thanksgiving
dinner
1. Council discussion/direction
C. Scheduling of future agenda item related to Sonoma County special event permits for
events held near or adjacent to Rohnert Park city limits.
1. Council discussion/direction
16. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION IN CONFERENCE ROOM 2A TO CONSIDER:
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to CaI. Gov't Code section 54956.9(b): One
potential case involving the claims of the County of Sonoma that the County's cities are
liable for the costs of closing and monitoring the closure of the County's centrallandfilI.
B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EV ALUA TION (Government Code 954957)
Title: City Manager
Annual performance review of City Manager
17. RECONVENE OPEN SESSION IN COUNCIL CHAMBER
18. MAYOR'S REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION (Government Code ~ 54957.1)
19. PUBLIC COMMENTS
20. ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: Time shown for any particular matter on the agenda is an estimate only. Matters may be considered
earlier or later than the time indicated depending on the pace at which the meeting proceeds. If you wish to speak on
an item under discussion by the Council which appears on this agenda, after receiving recognition from the Mayor,
please walk to the rostrum and state your name and address for the record.
- PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING -
Any item raised by a member of the public which is not agendized and may require Council action shall be
automatically referred to staff for investigation and disposition which may include placing on a future agenda. If the
item is deemed to be an emergency or the need to take action arose after posting of the agenda within the meaning
of Government Code Section 54954.2(b), Council is entitled to discuss the matter to determine if it is an emergency
item under said Government Code and may take action thereon.
CERIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA
I, Terri Griffin, City Clerk for the City of Rohnelt Park, declare that the foregoing agenda for the September 27,
2011, Joint Regular Meeting of the Rohnert Park City Council/CDC/RPF A was posted and available for review
on September 22, 2011, at Rohnert Park City Hall, 130 A vram A venue, Rohnert Park, California 94928. The
agenda is also available on the City web site at www.rpcitv.on~,
Executed this 22nd day of September, 2011, at Rohnert Park, California.
Terri Griffin, City Clerk
092711 AGENDA-JT REGULAR MTG OF RPCITY COUNC1L-CDC-RPFA
COURTESY AGENDA
09/27/11
Connie Bolmeier
Rohnert Park-Cotati Regional Library
6250 Lynne Conde Way
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Dan Adam, Fire Marshall
Department of Public Safety
Robin Miller
Cultural Arts Commission
1206 Capri Way
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
NOTE:
Place marker on agenda for each
individual recipient.
pratiksha Sharma
655 Enterprise Dr., #129
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Beth Dadko
Health Information Specialist
Sonoma County Health Services
bdadko@sonoma-countv.org
Phyllis Transue
Cultural Arts Commission
50 Francis Circle
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Sherry Courter
SCourter@srcitv.org
ChuniAnello
Cultural Arts Commission
459 Enterprise Drive
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Andrew Dylan Wright
Andrew.wright@oce.com
~.r.:~ ~~.
..:.;-~ be"~.
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
Dale: ~. Agenda Hem #: L/. l:
Name: ~ ~ct La
Address:
Phone: '5 '4 (p - .s I ~
(j)
TOPIC:_l.\-,p ~ it '1.C
Brief Summal"Y of Comments:
SRTS
See Reverse ~
Griffin, Terri
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 12
[Distributed 9/23/11]
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Griffin, Terri
Friday, September 23,2011 3:51 PM
Griffin, Terri
Gonzalez, Gabe
Item No. 12 - Additional Letter of Interest for LaCe North Bay Division Executive Board
Item No. 12 - Additional Letter of Interest.pdf
Mayor Belforte and Members of the City Council:
Attached for your consideration is an additional letter of interest received today from Susan Harvey, Vice Mayor, Cotati.
Hard copies will also be distributed on the dais at next Tuesday's meeting. No letters of interest were received for the
Sonoma County Child Care Planning Council.
Terri
Terri A. Griffin, CMC
City Clerk
CITI OF ROHNERT PARK
130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
11 (707) 588-2225
~ (707) 792-1876
[8J tgriffin@rpcitv.orq
website I facebook
1
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 12
[Distributed 9/23/11]
Sonoma County, California
City of Cotati
September 21, 2011
Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmembers
c/o Gay Johann, City Clerk, City of Sonoma
Via email for distribution to Sonoma County Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association
Dear Mayors and Councilmembers,
I am requesting your consideration to support me for a position on the Executive Board of the North Bay Division
of the League of Cities.
Since being elected to Cotati's City Council in 2009, I have served on the Solid Waste Advisory Group,
Association of Bay Area Governments, Sonoma County Health Action, Solar Sonoma County, Subregional
Wastewater Policy Advisory Committee and as the City's liaison to the Planning Commission and the Library
Advisory Board. Prior to my election to the City Council I served as Planning Commissioner and was involved in
the adoption in Cotati's Downtown Specific Plan. Additionally, I am a recent graduate from the Leadership for the
Ecology and Economy program. I currently serve as the Vice Mayor for the City ofCotati, and I am actively
involved as the liaison for our Chamber of Commerce.
Although short-lived, it was truly my honor to serve as the Mayor and Councilmembers representative on the
Human Services Commission. My participation in the Human Services Commission Spring Panel provided me
with insights to those in need in our communities, and how our social service organizations work very hard with
few resources to improve life for so many people.
I have over 30 years of experience in management of business and information systems, with a track record of
bringing together diverse points of view to solve problems and achieve results. My business background has taught
me that everyone brings something of value to the table, and that it is important to listen and work together in order
to work through tough issues to develop the right solutions. I strongly believe that in working together we can
achieve what may seem to be unachievable. I intend to use my skills, energy and enthusiasm to help solve the needs
of our communities on the North Bay Division League of California Cities' Executive Board.
I would be honored to be given the opportunity to learn more about your cities by representing you on the North
Bay Division League of California Cities' Executive Board. Given the opportunity, I will work hard to represent
you.
I truly appreciate the support and consideration of the Mayor and Councilmembers. Please feel free to contact me
at or by phone 707-795-0637.
Respectfully yours,
Susan Harvey
Vice Mayor, City of Cotati
201 West Sierra Avenue, Cotati, CA 94931-4217 - TELEPHONE 707879284600 - FAX 795-7067
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO.9
LED and Induction
~ Alternative Street Lighting
HPS (existino)
LED (high efficiency)
Induction (high efficiency)
~ LED & Induction Technology Analysis
, Capital Cost
20-Year Life Cycle Costs
Performance Characteristics
Market Trends
. Incentives
~ Recommended Technology
1
~ Awarded $164,100 via the Energy Efficiency
Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) - ARRA
funding - Sept. 2009
~ $85,000 allocated to street light conversions
, $55,000 - LED lights at various City parks (completed)
, $ 5,000 - LED lights at the Community Center
(completed)
$25.000 - Pilot street light conversion project (=
remaining grant fUQding balance)
~ Existing Infrastructure = High Pressure Sodium
(HPS) fixtures
o Old technology (most common)
Relatively high O&M costs
Consumes more energy than LED and Induction
2,700 HPS street lights currently existing
2,100 x 70 watt fixtures (primarily in residential areas)
, 350 x 150 watt fixtures (main roads like Enterprise Dr. & RPX)
, Total energy cost per year = approximately $140,000
9/27/2011
2
Includes initial outlay for new fixtures:
For a 70-Watt Equivalent Fixture
Alternatives
Alt 1 - Induction
Capital
J/fixture
Alt 2 - LED
452
412
372
Existing - HP5
~ LED fixtures approx. 10% lower than induction
~ $50 rebate available per LED fixture from PG&E
2 Components of the 20-Year Life-Cycle Cost
~ Energy Cost
~ Maintenance Cost (maintenance cost = replacement cost)
HPS CONVERSION TABLE - Energy Usage
HPS (existing) 70 watt
LED (high efficiency) 37 watt
INDUCTION (high efficiency) 40 watt
9/27/2011
3
Actual Bulb life
Alternatives Duration Expectancy*
Alt 1 - Induction 94,000 hrs 20 yrs
Alt 2 - LED 1 50,000 hrs 37 yrs
Existing - HPS 24,000 hrs 6 yrs
* Light fixture is at least 70% light output at end of life expectancy.
How often do we replace the lamps in street lights?
20-Year life-Cycle Conversion
# of Bulb
Changes/20-yrs
1
.54
What we can
expect over a
20-yr period...
Alternative
Induction
LED
3
HPS (existing)
Total Total
Annual 20-Year Life
Cost Cycle
Power Power Annual Bulb Power and Power and
Alternatives Capital Usage Cost"" Replacement Replacement Replacement
J/fixture (watts) (S/vr) (S/yr) (S/vr) (S/fixture/20yeor)
Alt 1 - Induction 452 40 20 11 33 660
Alt 2 - lED 412. 37 19 9.5 29 580
Existing - HPS 372 70 42 30 72 1,440
* Capital cost does not include $50 rebate for LED retrofit projects
"Power costs are based on usage of I I hrs/day or 4, 100 hrs/year.
9/27/2011
4
To convert 2, 100 70-watt fixtures:
Total
Total Projected
"Power *Replacement Annual
Conversion Savings Savings Savings
Alternatives Cost (S) ($fv') (Sly') (Sly,) Payback
Alt I - Induction 950,000 46,200 39,900 86,000 11 years
Alt 2 - lED 760,000 48,300 43,000 91,000 8.3 years
. = cost of current HPS Power & Replacement - Induction/LED Power & Replacement
LED
. A Semi-conductor light source - a circuit
board with an array of LED's.
. Energy Efficient - saves 40% over HPS
. Environmentally friendly - 100% recyclable
material
INDUCTION
. Charges Mercury atoms to produce UV light
source - similar to fluorescent lamps
. Similar energy efficiency to LED
. Mercury disposal needs special handling
. A matured technology, 10 + years, not
common & no new improvement potential
9/27/2011
5
lED
. Distributes light very evenly
. See more colors, almost like
sunlight
INDUCTION
. Produces a glow, less even light
distribution
. Similar, See more colors, almost like
sunlight
San Jose Hellyer Road Mock-up
Maxwell Bridge, Napa - LED Lighting
AFTER
9/27/2011
6
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge - lED lighting
~ Conserves energy - Saves $$$'s
o Change City Standard to lower lighting level
o Additional energy reductions possible in the
future (Change from 70 watt HPS to 30 watt LED - 57%
energy reduction)
> Distributes light better
o Enhanced visibility - broader color spectrum
9/27/2011
7
~ Provides dimming technology
o Additional energy and cost savings
~ Lasts longer
o Next generation LED is rated to 1 50,000 hours or
36-year life expectancy
~ More agencies and local governments are
moving towards LED street light technology.
~ This will allow for bulk purchasing of the
fixtures to bring down costs.
o An example is PG&E's LED turn-key program.
9/27/2011
8
Current street light conversion projects:
LED
. County of Marin
Danville
. Los Angeles
. Morgan Hill
. Novato
. petaluma
. Pittsburg
. San Francisco
. San Jose
. Santa Cruz
. Walnut Creek
. Washington D.C.
. Watsonville
. CalTrans*
INDUCTION
. Antioch
. Cupertino
. San Diego
* CalTrans has developed
a standard for LED's
which is being used as a
model for other City's to
fol/ow.
Current incentives favor LED technology:
· PG&E rebate = $50jfixture
. 12% price reduction for 70 watt-equivalent LED lighting
fixture
· PG&E reduced tariff rate
. Bulk purchasing power and project management
. PG&E's Turn-Key Program
. PG&E's total project management concept
. Low-interest financing programs
. Offered by PG&E and the State
9/27/2011
9
DESCRIPTION LED INDUCTION
. .
.~~~~~~~~~~~:~~:=::::::~:~:=:::~:~:~:::~:::::::~=::::~L=::~::::::::~::~~~:::~]:~:~::=~::::~:=::~::::::~:
LIFE CYCLE COST: I * !
"PERFO'R'MANCE~'"'''''''''''''''''''''''''-''''-''''''''_''H'''''''......1...............--.......................r..........-............-..........-
...............................--...............................................................~..._......._..........................+...-....-............................
. Energy Efficiency I * !
.......:....u~h~.;;i~.~.;ib~.ti.~~........_....._......._..................-..1.............-... * ............-..-l.....-.-..........-..........-......
.....................................-............................................................+....-............................-...+-.....................................""...
. Longevity ! * !
..........................................................................................................+...........................................+-.-...................-...........
. Dimming I * I
.:-.E;i;~.~;;;-;;~~i...._............._....~..._..............._....r................;..-.-.-..-T-....-..-........---..
TRENDS.&:-j.N-CENTi.VES;..............._...............................l....................-...................r..............-..-.................
..................-.........._....__...................-........................................tt.......................................--t'.....-..................................
. State and Nationwide Retrofits ~ * !
~~~~:~:~~~~:::::--=F=+::=f=:==
RECOM'MENDATIO
· Direct staff to develop a LED
street light standard for adoption
by the City Council at a later date.
9/27/2011
10
LED Street Light Conversion Project would
benefit the City by:
· Saving the General Fund money;
· Meeting the City's Greenhouse Gas Action Plan
goals;
. Maximizing volume purchase power and
eligibility for further rebates; and
· Providing means for evaluating and planning
future citywide LED street light conversion
project. .
9/27/2011
11
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 4.A
~rotlamatfon
'At!' of ~obntrt ~ari
Proclaiming October, 2011 as
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE A W ARENESSMONTH
WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park recognizes that the crime of domestic violence violates an
individual's privacy, dignity, and security due to the systematic use of emotional, physical,
psychological, and economic control or abuse; and
WHEREAS, domestic violence happens in the homes of the rich, the poor, the religious, and the
agnostic. It is present in the homes of people. of all races. In other words, there is terrorism on
American soil- in our families - and it continues to increase; and
WHEREAS, one out of every three women experience physical assault by a partner during
adulthood - a health care threat of epidemic proportions; and
WHEREAS, stopping the cycle of vicious criminal assault in the home requires a coordinated
effort between the criminal justice system and the agencies that provide services to victims - as
well as the resolve and courage of survivors; and
WHEREAS, our focus is to increase awareness and education on domestic violence, its causes,
signs, prevention, and treatment; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that I, Gina Belforte, as Mayor and on behalf of
the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park, do hereby proclaim the month of October, 2011 as
Domestic Violence Awareness Month in Rohnert Park.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 27th day of September, 2011.
CITY OF ROHNERTPARK
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 4.8
~fftte of tbe jAAapor of tbe QCitp of l\obnert t)ark, QCalifornia
t)roclamation
Proclaiming
October 9-15, 2011 as
2011 Fire Prevention Month
WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park is committed to ensuring the safety and security of those living in and visiting our
City; and
WHEREAS, fire is a serious public safety concern both locally and nationally, and homes are where people are at
greatest risk from fire; and
WHEREAS, according to the latest research from the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), in 2009 home fires
killed more than 2,500 people in the U.S., and fire departments in the United States responded to more than 360,000
home fires; and .
WHEREAS, cooking equipment is the leading cause of home structure fires and injuries, and the third leading cause of
home fire deaths; and
WHEREAS, heating and electrical equipment and smoking materials are among the leading causes of all reported
home fires. The risk of dying in a home structure fire caused by smoking materials rises with age; and
WHEREAS, home candle fires are reported to a U.S. fire department on an average of every 30 minutes; and
WHEREAS, working smoke alarms cut the risk of dying in reported home fires in half and automatic fire sprinkler
systems cut the risk of dying in a home fire by about 80%; and
WHEREAS, Rohnert Park's first responders are dedicated to reducing the occurrence of home fires and home fire
injuries through prevention and protection education; and
WHEREAS, residents who have planned and practiced a home fire escape plan are more prepared and will therefore
be more likely to survive a fire; and
WHEREAS, the 2011 Fire Prevention Week theme, "Protect your Family from Fire!" effectively serves to remind us all
of the simple actions we can take to keep our homes and families safe from fire year-round.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that I, Gina Belforte, as Mayor and on behalf of the City Council of the City
of Rohnert Park, do hereby recognize October 9-15 as 2011 Fire Prevention Week in Rohnert Park and hope to
heighten the awareness and increase the education of our residents so they are able to take personal steps to
increase their safety from fire, especially in their homes.
Duly and Regularly Proclaimed this 27th day of September, 2011
by
Gina Belforte, Mayor
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 4.C
l!J)fftte of tbe JAAa!,or of tbe ([it!, of l\.obnert ~ark, ([alifornia
llroclamation
jJJrotlnimiug
<l&ctober 5, 2011
3Jnternational Walk anb 3L\oU to ~cbool ;map in 3L\obnert ~ark
WHEREAS, a lack of physical activity plays a leading role in rising rates of obesity, diabetes, and other
health problems among children, and being able to walk or bike to school offers an opportunity to build
activity into daily routines; and
WHEREAS, driving students to school in private vehicles contributes to traffic congestion, air pollution, and
climate change; and
WHEREAS, an important role for parents and caregivers is to teach children about pedestrian and bicycle
safety and become aware of the difficulties and dangers that children face on their trip to school each day
and the health and environmental risks related to physical inactivity and air pollution; and
WHEREAS, community leaders and parents can determine the "walkability" or "bikeability" of their
community by using a walkability or bikeability checklist and collaborating with local public works agencies;
and .
WHEREAS, children, parents and community leaders around the world are joining together to walk and bike
to school and evaluate walking and bicycling conditions in their communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that I, Gina Belforte, as Mayor and on behalf of the City Council
of the City of Rohnert Park, do hereby proclaim October 5, 2011, "International Walk and Roll to School Day"
in Rohnert Park and encourage our residents to become involved in the safety and health of our children.
Duly and Regularly Proclaimed this 21h day of September, 2011
by:
Gina Belforte, Mayor
DRAFT MINUTES
PENDING APPROVAL
MINUTES OF THE JOINT REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
City Council
Community Development Commission
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
Tuesday, September 13,2011
Rohnert Park City Hall, Council Chamber
130 Avram Avenue, RohnertPark, California
1. CALL TO ORDERlROLL CALL
Mayor Belforte called the City CouncillCDC/RPFAjoint regular meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Present: Gina Belforte, Mayor
Jake Mackenzie, Vice Mayor
Amy Ahanotu, Council Member
Pam Stafford, Council Member
Absent: Joseph T. Callinan, Council Member
Staff present: City Manager Gabriel Gonzalez, City Attorney Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, and City
Clerk Terri Griffin.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Belforte led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. SSU STUDENT REPORT
Amanda Burke, Sonoma State University Associated Students, Inc. (SSU ASI) Legislative
Representative provided an update regarding current activities at SSU.
4. PRESENTATIONS
A. Kristen Reeder, Education Outreach Director, made a presentation regarding services by Sonoma
County Wildlife Rescue
B. Lynne Conde, Director of Santa Rosa Junior College Medical Assisting Program and faculty of
Bauman College, made a presentation regarding healthy eating, fitness and academic
performance and accepted a Proclamation Proclaiming the Week of September 26-30, 2011 as
Child~ood Obesity Prevention and Fitness Week.
5. CITY MANAGER / CITY ATTORNEY / DEPARTMENT HEAD BRIEFINGS
Director of Development Services Darrin Jenkins reported on a recent Building Code Enforcement
Evaluation report issued by the Insurance Services Office (ISO).
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. Lee Pierce, Government Affairs Manager, Global Recovery, spoke regarding Agenda Item No.8.
2. Maureen Gleeson spoke regarding Agenda Item No.8.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR
Vice Mayor Mackenzie pulled Item 7.C.l (Resolution 2011-86).
Council Member Stafford pulled Item 7.D (Approval of Letter of Commitment to Support the
SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation Funding Opportunity
(DE-FP A-0000549).)
Mayor Belforte pulled Item 7.B.I (City Bills/Demands for Payment dated September 13,2011).
A. Approval of Minutes for:
1. City Council/CDC/RPF A Joint Regular Meeting - August 23, 2011
B. Acceptance of Reports for:
2. CDC Bills/Demands for Payment dated September 13,2011
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Mackenzie/Stafford) and carried 4-0-1 (Callinan absent) to approve
the Consent Calendar except for Items 7 .B.I, 7 .C.1, and 7.D.
Items removed from Consent Calendar:
7.B.I Acceptance of City Bills/Demands for Payment dated September 13,2011.
Mayor Belforte stated her intention to abstain due to a listed payment to her business.
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Mackenzie/Stafford) and carried 3-0-1-1 (Belforte abstain and
Callinan absent) to accept Item No.7 .B.l.
7.C.l Adoption of Resolution No. 2011-86, Approving a Reimbursement Agreement between City
of Rohnert Park and Sonoma Land Acquisition Company, LLC for Northwest Specific Plan
Area
ACTION: Following Council discussion, it was moved/seconded (Mackenzie/Stafford) and carried
4-0-1 (Callinan absent) to approve Item No. 7.C.1.
7.D. Approval of Letter of Commitment. to Support the SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar
Challenge to Induce Market Transformation Funding Opportunity (DE-FP A-0000549)
ACTION: Following Council discussion, it was moved/seconded (Stafford/Mackenzie) and carried
4-0-1 (Callinan absent) to approve Item No. 7.D.
8. AWARD FOR TEMPORARY DEBRIS BOX SERVICES
Consideration of (1) rejecting certain applications for exclusive and non-exclusive temporary debris
box and roll-off collection services as non-responsive and affirming other applications as responsive;
and (2) awarding a franchise agreement for exclusive temporary debris box and roll-off collection
services to RohnertPark Disposal, Inc.
Vice Mayor Mackenzie noted that a revised Resolution No. 2011-88 was placed on the dais for the
Council's consideration. City Attorney Kenyon further noted that copies of the supplemental packet
and revised resolution were placed on the table at the rear of the Council Chamber.
A. Staff report provided by City Manager Gonzalez, Richard Tagore-Erwin, R3 Consulting, and
City Attorney Kenyon. City Attorney Kenyon further reported on a potential threat of litigation
received within the last 24 hours regarding continuation rights. As a result, two major changes
were made to Resolution No. 2011-88: (1) a more thorough explanation of the continuation rights
issue was included for a full record; and (2) an indemnification requirement by Rohnert Park
Disposal was included in the event there is litigation concerning the award.
Council Member Stafford and Mayor Belforte provided a report for the Waste & Recycling
Committee.
B. Public Comments
1. Curtis Michelini, Industrial Carting
2. John Moore, attorney for Industrial Carting
3. Terry Benedict
C. Resolutions for Adoption:
1. 2011-87 Rejecting Certain Applications for Exclusive and Non-Exclusive Temporary
Debris Box and Roll-off Collection Services as Non-Responsive and Affirming
Other Applications as Responsive
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Stafford/Mackenzie) and carried 4-0-1 (Callinan absent) to
adopt Resolution No. 2011-87.
2. 2011-88 Awarding a Franchise Agreement for Exclusive Temporary Debris Box and Roll-
off Collection Services to Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc.
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Stafford/Ahanotu) and carried 4-0-1 (Callinan absent) to adopt
the revised Resolution No. 2011-88.
9. GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL REPORT
Review of the Annual Report on the Status of the General Plan Calendar Year 2009-2010, and
direction to staff to file the Annual Report to the State Office of Planning and Research and the
Department of Housing and Community Development
A. Staff Report provided by Planning and Building Manager Marilyn Ponton.
B. Public Comments: None
DIRECTION: Council concurred to direct staff to file the Annual Report with the State Office of
Planning and Research and the Department of Housing and Community
Development.
10. PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA
Consideration of a draft application to designate Central Rohnert Park as a Priority Development
Area (PDA) and direction to staff to complete application and bring final application and resolution
authorizing submittal of application to FOCUS for Council adoption at the September 27, 2011
meeting.
A. Staff Report provided by Management Analyst Eydie Tacata
B. Public Comments: None
DIRECTION: Council concurred to direct to staff bring the final application to designate Central
Rohnert Park as a Priority Development Area (PDA) and a resolution authorizing
submittal of the application to FOCUS for Council adoption at the September 27,
2011 meeting.
11. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CONTINUATION ORDINANCE
Consideration of introducing Ordinance No. 839 determining to comply with the Alternative
V oluntary Redevelopment Program pursuant to Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and
Safety Code in order to permit the continued existence and operation of the Rohnert Park Community
Development Commission.
A. Staff Report provided by Economic Development Manager Babonis
B. Public Comments: None
C. Ordinance for Introduction: Waive Full Reading and Introduce Ordinance by Reading Title:
1. No. 839 Ordinance of the City of Rohnert Park Determining to Comply with the
Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Pursuant to Part 1.9 of Division
24 of the California Health and Safety Code in Order to Permit the Continued
Existence and Operation of the Community Development Commission of the
City of Rohnert Park
ACTION: Moved/seconded (Mackenzie/Stafford) and carried 4-0-1 (Callinan absent) by roll call
vote to introduce Ordinance No. 839.
12. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE RESOLUTIONS
Consideration of the City's position on the League of California Cities Annual Conference
Resolutions and direction to the City's voting delegate
A. Staff Report provided by City Manager Gonzalez
B. Public Comments: None
DIRECTION:
Resolution No.1: Alternative Methods of Meeting Public Notice Requirements and to Advocate for
Revisions to the Government Code Recognizing Alternative Methods as a Means to Meet Noticing
Requirements.
Council concurred to direct the Mayor to approve this resolution.
Resolution No.2: Tort Reform
Council concurred to direct the Mayor to approve this resolution.
Resolution No.3: Raising Public Awareness about the Imminent Health and Safety Concerns for
Bullied Children
Council concurred to direct the Mayor to approve this resolution.
Resolution No.4: Prison Rape Elimination Act of2003
Due to a 2-2 tie, no Council direction was given and no action will be taken on this resolution.
Resolution No.5: Replacement of the Death Penalty with the Sentence of Life Imprisonment without
the Possibility of Parole
A majority of the Council concurred to direct the Mayor to take no action on this resolution.
Resolution No.6: City of Bell
A majority of the Council concurred to direct the Mayor to approve this resolution.
13. STANDING COMMITTEE / AD HOC COMMITTEE / LIAISON REPORTS
A. Standing Committee Reports: None
B. Liaison Reports
1. Vice Mayor Mackenzie reported on the Sonoma County Transportation Authority/Regional
Climate Protection Authority (SCTA/RPCA) meeting held September 12.
C. Other Reports
1. Council Member Stafford reported on the Rohnert Park Chamber of Commerce Noontimes
held September 7.
2. Mayor Belforte reported on the Chili N' Wheels event.
3. Council Member Stafford reported on the 1 st Annual Art and Music Festival.
14. COMMUNICATIONS
At the request of Council Member Ahanotu, City Attorney Kenyon provided an update regarding the
issues raised in a recent communication received from Robert Grundman. Council concurred to
direct the City Attorney to provide the City Attorney's previous legal review and opinion to the
Council for consideration and possible further direction.
15. MATTERS FROMfFOR COUNCIL
A. DIRECTION: Council concurred to schedule a City Council Work Session on October 11,
2011, at 4:30 p.m. regarding Fiscal Year 2010-11 Year End Financial Report and Fiscal Year
2011-12 Cash Emergency Preparedness Plan
At the request of Mayor Belforte, Council concurred to allow the Mayor to discuss with the
Mayors' and Cbuncilmembers' Association membership the possibility of job creation through
local public works projects.
Mayor Belforte announced the upcoming Sock Hop fundraiser for the City's 50th Celebration on
September 24 and a BBQ Cook-off at Sonoma Mountain Village on October 1.
Mayor Belforte acknowledged the Public Safety Department for Chief Dennett's Memorial
Service.
Mayor Belforte reported that on September 11 at 10:00 a.m. the Public Safety Department
participated in a National Moment of Remembrance by holding radio silence for one minute,
sounding station alarms, and flying City flags at half-mast. Mayor Belforte further announced
that five local churches also rang bells, observed a moment of silence, or stopped services in
remembrance.
16. FOXTAIL GOLF COURSE
Consideration of request by CourseCo, Inc., Foxtail Golf Course management firm, to renegotiate
existing lease agreement between the City of Rohnert Park and CourseCo, Inc.
A. Disclosure of potential conflict
Council Member Stafford stated that she resides within 500' of the golf course.
Council Member Ahanotu stated that he resides within 500' of the golf course.
Mayor Belforte stated that she resides within 500' of the golf course.
B. Random selection of disqualified council members
City Clerk Griffin randomly selected Council Member Stafford and Mayor Belforte to participate
in this matter by drawing their names out of a box.
Council Member Ahanotu left the meeting at 8:01 p.m.
C. Staff Report provided by City Manager Gonzalez.
D. Public Comments
1. Tom Isaak, Foxtail Golf Course
2. John Telischak, Foxtail Golf Course
DIRECTION: Council concurred with the staff recommendation to (1) perform an analysis of the
implications of renegotiating the agreement versus not renegotiating the agreement
and report back to the Council within one month; and (2) direct staff to send
CourseCo a demand letter for the delinquent amount due.
17. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
18. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Belforte adjourned the joint regular meeting at 8: 19 p.m.\
Gina Belforte, Mayor
City of Rohnert Park
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
BILLS FOR ACCEPTANCE
September 27, 2011
Check Numbers: 201375 - 201654
Dated: Sept. 12,2011 - Sept. 21, 2011
TOTAL
$2,619,070.40.
$2,619,070.40
Accounts Payable
Checks for Approval
User: ccolburn
Printed: 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
201375
09/12/2011
General Fund
Blue Cross W/H Payable
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS
25,162.46
201375
09/12/2011
General Fund
Emplyee Benfits /Health InsBl
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS
50,142.88
Check Total:
75,305.34
201376
09/12/2011
General Fund
Court Order Payable
CA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
17.00
Check Total:
17.00
201377
09/12/2011
General Fund
Blue Cross W/H Payable
HSA Bank
125.00
Check Total:
125.00
2013.78
09/12/2011
General Fund
Kaiser W/H Payable
KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC
104,169.86
201378
09/12/2011
General Fund
Emplyee Benfits /Medical Insur
KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC
44,622.64
Check Total:
148,792.50
201379
09/12/2011
General Fund
Kaiser W/H Payable
KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC
998.57
Check Total:
998.57
201380
09/12/2011
General Fund
Emplyee Benfits /Medical Insur
KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC
689.78
Check Total:
689.78
201381
09/12/2011
General Fund
Standard Ins Payable
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS
CO
956.30
Check Total:
956.30
AP Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM ) Page 1
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201382
09/12/2011
General Fund
Standard Ins Payable
MYERS- STEVENS & TOOHEY
1,248.00
Check Total:
1,248.00
201383
201383
09/12/2011
General Fund
Def Comp Payable -Gw
NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATIO
1,225.00
09/12/2011
General Fund
Def Comp Payable -Gw
NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATIO
2,322.50
Check Total:
3,547.50
201384
09/12/2011
General Fund
Def Comp Payable -Gw
NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATIO
2,611.49
Check Total:
2,611.49
201385
09/12/2011
General Fund
Rpea Dues
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
225.00
Check Total:
225.00
201386
09/12/2011
General Fund
Scope Dues Payable
SEIU Local 1021
1,089.14
Check Total:
1,089.14
201387
09/12/2011
General Fund
Court Order Payable
United States Treasury
325.00
Check Total:
325.00
201388
09/12/2011
General Fund
United Way Payable
UNITED WAY
85.00
Check Total:
85.00
201389
09/12/2011
General Fund
Eye CareNSP/Payables
Vision Service Plan - (CA)
5,450.84
Check Total:
5,450.84
201390
09/12/2011
General Fund
Emplyee Benfits /Dental Care
Vision Service Plan - (CA)
1,297.55
Check Total:
1,297.55
201391
09/12/2011
General Fund
Eye CareNSP/Payables
Vision Service Plan - (CA)
506.49
Check Total:
506.49
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM)
Paae,
Check Number .Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
201392 09/12/2011 General Fund Emplyee Benfits /Dental Care Vision Service Plan - (CA) 592.25
Check Total: 592.25
201393 09/13/2011 General Fund Police /Training/Ed. - Hyatt Regency Newport Beach 282.72
Check Total: 282.72
201394 09/13/2011 General Fund
201395
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201396
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201397
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
2013.97
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201398
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201399
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201400
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201400
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201400
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201400
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201400
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM )
Police /Training/Ed. - Troy Moore
Sewer Entr. /Miscellaneous Complete Welders Supply
Check Total:
Check Total:
Sewer Entr. /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
Check Total:
Sewer Entr. /Spec. Departm
Praxair Distribution Inc. - 19
Sewer Entr. /Spec. Departm
Praxair Distribution Inc. - 19
Check Total:
Sewer Entr. /Laguna Plant/
City of Santa Rosa
Check Total:
Refuse Col Entr /Contractual S
R3 Consulting Group
Check Total:
Collection/Contract Svcs -Rp Di
Rohnert Park Disposal
City Contractual Svcs
Rohnert Park Disposal
Refuse Col Entr /Cash
Rohnert Park Disposal
Refuse Col Entr /Cash
Rohnert Park Disposal
Refuse Col Entr/Refuse Div/Ed
Rohnert Park Disposal
Check Total:
180.00
180.00
1,955.17
1,955.17
40.71
40.71
8.26
70.50
78.76
678,316.83
678,316.83
11,060.00
11,060.00
717,073.66
134,298.59
717,073.66
- 864,368.89
12,996.64
717,073.66
Psae, I
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201401
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
Refuse Col Entr /Advertising/Pu
So Co Clerk
50.00
Check Total:
50.00
201402
201402
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
General Fund
General Fund
Planning
Planning
/Contractual S
/Contractual S
North Fork Associates
North Fork Associates
2,186.25
449.00
Check Total:
2,635.25
201403
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr.
/Spec. Departm
Costco Wholesale
479.46
Check Total:
479.46
201404
201404
201404
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
Utility Fund
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
Water Entr.
Water Entr.
/Spec. Departm
/Spec Dept Equ
/Spec Dept Equ
B.W.S. Distributors, Inc
B.W.S. Distributors, Inc
B.W.S. Distributors, Inc
34.77
1,263.66
754.08
Check Total:
2,052.51
201405
201405
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
Utility Fund
Water Entr.
Water Entr.
/Spec Dept Equ
/Spec Dept Equ
Bartley Pump, In.c
Bartley Pump, In.c
53,308.40
5,166.00
201406 09/14/2011 Utility Fund
201407 09/14/2011 Utility Fund
201407 09/14/2011 Utility Fund
201408 09/14/2011 Utility Fund
201408 09/14/2011 Utility Fund
201408 09/14/2011 Utility Fund
201409 09/14/2011 Utility Fund
VEHICLE GAS & OIL
Check Total:
Chevron and Texaco Business Ca
Check Total:
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair Grainger, Inc.
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm Grainger, Inc.
Water Entr. /Small Tools Home Depot
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm Home Depot
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair Home Depot
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ Horizon Distributors Inc.
Check Total:
Check Total:
58,474.40
580.87
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 4
580.87
124.11
28.83
152.94
588.10
176.77
18.33
783.20
38.64
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
201410
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201411
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201412
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201413
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201414
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201415
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201415
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201416
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201416
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201416
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201417
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201417
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201417
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
201417
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
38.64
3,624.82
3,624.82
2,696.00
2,696.00
281.87
281.87
11.34
11.34
172.55
172.55
24.09
245.48
269.57
4.95
-12.96
173.64.
165.63
107.42
107.42
105.44
105.44
Check Total: 425.72
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) D e
Check Total:
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Ken Grady Company, Inc.
Check Total:
Water Entr. /Water Meter Re
National Meter & Automation, I
Check Total:
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
Pace Supply
Check Total:
Water Entr. /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
Check Total:
WaterNehicle Repairs
Pep Boys
Check Total:
WaterNehicle Repairs
Redwood Coast Petroleum
WaterNehicle Repairs
Redwood Coast Petroleum
Check Total:
WaterNehicle Repairs
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
WaterNehicle Repairs
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
WaterNehicle Repairs
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
Check Total:
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Shamrock Materials
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Shamrock Materials
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Shamrock Materials
Water Ent/Distrib SystemRepair
Shamrock Materials
38.64
3,624.82
3,624.82
2,696.00
2,696.00
281.87
281.87
11.34
11.34
172.55
172.55
24.09
245.48
269.57
4.95
-12.96
173.64.
165.63
107.42
107.42
105.44
105.44
Check Total: 425.72
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) D e
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201418
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Contractual S
So Co Water Agency
222,141.62
Check Total:
222,141.62
201419
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
Water/Clothing Allowance
Sunset Linen Service
49.59.
Check Total:
49.59
201420
201420
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
Utility Fund
Utility Fund.
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Telstar Instruments Inc.
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Telstar Instruments Inc.
1,470.00
1,300.00
Check Total:
3,770.00
201421
201421
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
General Fund
General Fund
Ps Main Station Bldg/Facilty
ABM Janitorial Services - Nort
201421
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Bldg/Facilty
ABM Janitorial Services - Nort
1,624.00
Animal Shelter Bldg/Facilty M
ABM Janitorial Services - Nort
213.00
583.00
Check Total:
2,420.00
201422
09/14/2011
General Fund
Finance /Contractual S
Accountemps
1,710.00
Check Total:
1,710.00
201423
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pac /Postage
Ad Vantage Marketing
726.00
Check Total:
726.00
201424
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
All Good Driving School, Inc.
56.25
Check Total:
56.25
201425
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Office Su lie
PP
AM Printing Company
119.35
Check Total:
119.35
201426
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Contractual S
American Medical Response
300.00
Check Total:
300.00
201427 09/14/2011 General Fund Police / Cell Phone
American Messaging 8.86
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM )
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) n___
Check Total:
8.86
201428
09/14/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Spec. Departm
American Red Cross
232.00
Check Total:
232.00
201429
09/14/2011
General Fund
Spay/Neuter Voucher $2
Animal Hospital of Cotati
60.00
Check Total:
60.00
201430
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Aramark Uniform Services
788.21
201430
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Aramark Uniform Services
1,029.95
201430
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pac /Facility Repa
Aramark Uniform Services
113.29
201430
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Aramark Uniform Services
283.66
201430
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Aramark Uniform Services
209.93
201430
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter Bldg/Facilty M
Aramark Uniform Services
39.09
201430
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter Bldg/Facilty M
Aramark Uniform Services
39.09
Check Total:
2,503.22
201431
09/14/2011
General Fund
Sports Center. /Professional
ASA
375.00
Check Total:
375.00
201432
09/14/2011
General Fund
KEITH ASTLEY
64.47
Check Total:
64.47
201433
09/14/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Big 4 Party
271.25
201433
09/14/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Big 4 Party
271.25
201433
09/14/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Big 4 Parry
271.25
201433
09/14/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Big 4 Party
271.25
201433
09/14/2011
General Fund
Community Event.Contracts
Big 4 Party
387.35
Check Total:
1,472.35
201434
09/14/2011
General Fund
Fire /Training & Ed
JAMES BRADY
70.00
Check Total:
70.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) n___
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201435
09/14/2011
Utility Construction Fund
Eastside Trunk Swr Proj- Phase2
BRELJE & RACE CONSULTING
4,377.25
Check Total:
4,377.25
201436
201436
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Buchanan Food Service
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Buchanan Food Service
168.23
168.23
Check Total:
336.46
201437
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm Cntr/Publicity
Business Card
201437
09/14/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Business Card
19.00
201437
09/14/2011
General Fund
Codding Center /Excursions
Business Card
49.95
201437
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium B(dg/Facilty
Business Card
165.00
201437
09/14/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Spec. Departm
Business Card
47.40
201437
09/I4/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Publicity
Business Card
67.41
201437
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm Cntr/Publicity
Business Card
225.00
8.38
Check Total:
582.14
201438
09/14/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Professional
Business Card
201438
09/14/2011
General Fund
Community EvenUSpec. Dep
Business Card
225.00
201438
09/14/2011
General Fund
BARC SummerCamp /Supplies
Business Card
24.65
201438
09/14/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Business Card
132.46
201438
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Spec. Departm
Business Card
151.63
201438
09/14/2011
General Fund
BARC SummerCamp /Supplies
Business Card
21.00
201438
09/14/2011
General Fund
BARC SummerCamp /Supplies
Business Card
75.74
66.00
Check Total:
696.48
201439
09/14/2011
General Fund
Econ Develp /Travels & Mee
Busniess Card
66.59
Check Total:
66.59
201440
201440
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
Butler Schein Animal Health Su
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
Butler Schein Animal Health Su
14.32
687.74
Check Total:
702.06
201441
09/14/2011
General Fund
Emplyee Benfits /State Unemplo
CA EDD Dept
18,516.68
Check Total:
18,516.68
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM )
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
14,315.00
Check Total:
14,315.00
201442
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Carl's Body Shop
492.48
201443 09/14/2011 General Fund
201444 09/14/2011 General Fund
201445 09/14/2011 General Fund
201446 09/14/2011 General Fund
201446 09/14/2011 General Fund
201447 09/14/2011 General Fund
201448 09/14/2011 Capital Projects Fund
201449 09/14/2011 General Fund
201449 09/14/2011 General Fund
201450 09/14/2011 General Fund
201451 09/14/2011 General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty CASCO
Check Total: 492.48
160.24
Check Total:
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Spec. Departm Castino Restaurant Equipment &
Check Total:
Dawn Cerini
Check Total:
Police /Gas & Oil Chevron and Texaco Business Ca
Pubi Works Gen /Gas & Oil Chevron and Texaco Business Ca
Check Total:
Street Lighting /Spec. Departm City Electric Supply
160.24
550.23
550.23
61.87
61.87
649.58
46.05
695.63
253.89
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) pnae o
Check Total:
253.89
University Dist. Specific Plan
Clearwater Hydrology
14,315.00
Check Total:
14,315.00
R.P. Gymnasium /Spec. Departm
Comcast
66.66
Pac /Telephone
Comcast
18.16
Check Total:
84.82
Police /Training & Ed
Community Engagement and Youth
50.00
Check Total:
50.00
Animal Control /Advertising/P
The Community Voice
500.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) pnae o
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Check Total: 156.60
201457, 09/14/2011 General Fund Police /Training/Ed. - PATRICK FAHY 300.00
Check Total: 300.00
201458 09/14/2011 General Fund ROBERT FERRY 2,232.88
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Paee 10
Check Total:
500.00
201452
09/14/2011
General Fund
Rec Ref Clearing
Ana Contreras
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
201453
09/14/2011
General Fund
Rec Ref Clearing
Fernando Contreras
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Concession Pu
Costco Wholesale
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pac /Concessions
Costco Wholesale
87.65
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Office Supplie
Costco Wholesale
94.21
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Spec. Departm
Costco Wholesale
107.39
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pac /Concessions
Costco Wholesale
46.59
201454
09/14,/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Spec. Departm
Costco Wholesale
23.35
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Costco Wholesale
.59
1010.86
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pac /Concessions
Costco Wholesale
1
201454
09/14/2,011
General Fund
Pac /Concessions
Costco Wholesale
199.43
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
Ps Main Station Bldg/Facilty
Costco Wholesale
55.92
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter Bldg/Facilty M
Costco Wholesale
40.66
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pac /Concessions
Costco Wholesale
8 67
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Costco Wholesale
120.40
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Spec. Departm
Costeo Wholesale
22.00
201454
09/14/2011
General Fund
H Pool /Concession Pu
Costco Wholesale
65.03
294.84
Check Total:
1,332.59
201455
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Training/Ed. -
Double Tree by Hilton San Dieg
283.95
Check Total:
283.95
201456
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
DRIVE LINE SERVICE OF
156.60
Check Total: 156.60
201457, 09/14/2011 General Fund Police /Training/Ed. - PATRICK FAHY 300.00
Check Total: 300.00
201458 09/14/2011 General Fund ROBERT FERRY 2,232.88
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Paee 10
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
2,232.88
201459
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
205.00
Check Total:
205.00
201460
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Friedman's
88.28
Check Total:
88.28
201461
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Spec. Departm
Frizelle -Enos Company
243.84
201461
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Spec. Departm
Frizelle -Enos Company
238.00
Check Total:
481.84
201462
09/14/2011
General Fund
Planning /Training & Edu
GEORGE FROSTICK
150.00
Check Total:
150.00
201463
09/14/2011
General Fund
Street Lighting /Spec..Departm
Grainger, Inc.
62.11
201463
09/14/2011
General. Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Grainger, Inc.
24.62
201463
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Grainger, Inc.
39.80
201463
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Grainger, Inc.
39.85
201463
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Grainger, Inc.
128.46
201463
09/14/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup
Grainger, Inc.
47.94
201463
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
204.26
201463
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Grainger, Inc.
39.06
201463
09/14/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
19.43
201463
09/14/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Grainger, Inc.
36.62
201463
09/14/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
23.24
Check Total:
665.39
201464
09/14/2011
General.Fund
Police /Office Supplie
Joseph Halton, Printer
55.54
Check Total:
55.54
201465
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
266.07
201465
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
75.96
201465
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
74.91
201465
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
45.57
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) P�— I t
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
201465 09/14/2011 General Fund Animal Control /Shelter Food Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
201466 09/14/2011 General Fund
201467 09/14/2011 General Fund
201468
09/14/2011
General Fund
201468
09/14/2011
General Fund
201469
09/14/2011
General Fund
201469
09/14/2011
General Fund
201469
09/14/2011
General Fund
201469
09/14/2011
General Fund
201469
09/14/2011
General Fund
201469
09/14/2011
General Fund
201469
09/14/2011
General Fund
201470
09/14/2011
General Fund
201470
09/14/2011
General Fund
201471
09/14/2011
General Fund
201471
09/14/2011
General Fund
201472
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Training/Ed. -
Pac/Pasco /Production
Hilton Garden Inn Roseville
Tracy Hinman Sigrist
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Animal Shelter Bldg/Facilty M The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control
Check Total:
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
Home Depot
P/S Bldg -North Bldg/Facilty
Home Depot
Animal Control /Fac Maint/Non-
Home Depot
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Home Depot
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
Home Depot
Center Bldg/Facilty
Home Depot
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
Home Depot
Check Total:
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup Horizon Distributors Inc.
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup Horizon Distributors Inc.
Check Total:
Police /Training/Ed. - Hyatt Regency Newport Beach
Police /Training/Ed. - Hyatt Regency Newport Beach
Check Total:
City Hall Bldg/Facilty InfoStor
Check Total:
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) v�nA
726.77
453.00
453.00
1,602.65
1,602.65
80.00
60.00
140.00
43.26
30.29
39.32
57.40
57.41
26.25
26.25
280.18
159.65
730.08
889.73
282.72
282.72
565.44
34.50
34.50
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201473
09/14/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
JENSEN LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC
140.00
Check Total:
140.00
201474
.09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
JRL Machine & Driveline
987.08
Check Total:
987.08
201475
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Contractual S
Roger Klein, D.V.M.
2,190.00
201475
09/14/2011
General Fund
Spay/Neuter Voucher $2
Roger Klein, D.V.M.
345.00
Check Total:
2,535.00
201476
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Contractual S
Koefran Industries
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
201477
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Contractual S
Barbara Leach, D.V.M.
1,580.00
Check Total:
1,580.00
201478
09/14/2011
General Fund
Rec Ref Clearing
Gina Lindfors
100.00
Check Total:
100.00
201479
09/14/2011
General Fund
Sandra M. Lipitz
1,209.91
Check Total:
1,209.91
201480
09/14/2011
General Fund
Non - Department /Professional
Management Partners, Inc
4,887.00
Check Total:
4,887.00
201481
09/14/2011
General Fund
Rec Ref Clearing
Reina Martinez
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
201482
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
Matheson Tri -Gas, Inc.
113.16
201482
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
Matheson Tri -Gas, Inc.
37.83
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21 /2011 - 10:52 AM ). PaQe 13
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
150.99
201483
09/14/2011
General Fund
Animal Shelter Fees
Kathleen McCall
95.00
Check Total:
95.00
201484
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Spec. Departm
MED -TECH RESOURCES INC
158.67
Check Total:
158.67
201485
201485
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
General Fund
General Fund
Rec Ref Clearing
Rec Ref Clearing
Maria Mendoza
Maria Mendoza
400.00
-75.00
Check Total:
325.00
201486
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Spec. Departm
METRO PCS
50.00
Check Total:
50.00
201487
201487
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
General Fund
General Fund
Police /Training/Ed. -
Police /Training/Ed. -
Troy Moore
Troy Moore
180.00
180.00
Check Total:
360.00
201488
09/14/2011
General Fund
Non- Department /Contractual S
Municipal Code Corporation
500.00
Check Total:
500.00
201489
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pac /City Events /Contractual S
N2 Holdings, Inc
122.50
Check Total:
122.50
201490
201490
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
General Fund
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Nardsons Enterprises, Inc.
Nardsons Enterprises, Inc.
153.00
40.00
Check Total:
I93.00
201491
09/14/2011
General Fund
Fire /Uniforms
National Document Solutions, L
536.64
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10 :52 AM) PaaP 14
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) p�no
Check Total:
536.64
201492
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police / Cell Phone
Sprint/ Nextel Communications
399.65
Check Total:
399.65
201493
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pac /Marketing
North Bay Bohemian
222.00
201493
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pac /Marketing
North Bay Bohemian
254.89
Check Total
476.89
201494
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pers'L & Purch /Recruitment/G
North Bay Corporate Health Ser
48.00
Check Total:
48.00
201495
09/14/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Professional
North Coast Officials Associat
449.00
Check Total:
449.00
201496
09/14/2011
Capital Projects Fund
Sonoma Mtn Village Project
North Fork Associates
130.81
201496
09/14/2011
Capital Projects Fund
Sonoma Mtn Village Project
North Fork Associates
2,317.00
Check Total:
2,447.81
201497
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Office Supphe
Office Depot
26.46
Check Total:
26.46
201498
09/14/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Contractual S
Old Adobe Development Services
790.92
201498
09/14/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Contractual S
Old Adobe Development Services
540.15
201498
09/14/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Contractual S
Old Adobe Development Services
324.09
201498
09/14/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Contractual S
Old Adobe Development Services
216.66
201498
09/14/2011
General Fund
City Hall Annex Bldg/Facilty
Old Adobe Development Services
324.09
201498
09/14/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Contractual S
Old Adobe Development Services
864.24
201498
09/14/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Contractual S
Old Adobe Development Services
648.18
201498
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pac /Facility Repa
Old Adobe Development Services
1,618.00
Check Total:
5,326.33
201499
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Pace Supply
1,530.85
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) p�no
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total: t 530 85
201500 09/14/2011 General Fund
201501 09/14/2011 General Fund
201502 09/14/2011 General Fund
201503 09/14/2011 General Fund
Park Maint /Heat/Light/Po Pacific Gas & Electric
Non - Department /Heat/Light/Po Pacific Gas & Electric
City Hall /Heat/Light/Po Pacific Gas & Electric
R.P. Gymnasium /Heat/Light/Po Pacific Gas & Electric
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
773.50
773.50
20.70
20.70
40.01
40.01
2,931.84
Check Total:
2,931.84
201504
09/14/2011
General Fund
Non - Department /Heat/Light/Po
Pacific Gas & Electric
188.65
Check Total:
188.65
201505
09/14/2011
General Fund
Pers'L & Purch /Professional
PATRICK CLARK CONSULTING
3,723.52
Check Total:
31723.52
201506
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
PGE
59.47
Check Total:
59.47
201507
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Power Industries
658.52
Check Total:
658.52
201508
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
Praxair Distribution Inc. - 19
311.56
Check Total:
311.56
201509
201509
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum.
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
743.58
1,443.51
AP - Checks for
Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM )
Check Number. Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
201509
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
758.88
201509
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
673.65
201509
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,300.94
201509
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Gas &.Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
700.50
201509
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
994.23
201509
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,133.42
201509
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
512.72
Check Total:
8,261.43
201510
09/14/2011
General Fund
EAP Expense
Redwood Empire Municipal Insur
695.54
Check Total:
695.54
201511
09/14/2011
General Fund
Spay/Neuter Voucher $2
Dr. Joel Reif
970.00
Check Total:
970.00
201512
09/14/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike. /Spec. Departm
Reliable Hardware & Steel Co.
987.35
201512
09/14/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
Reliable Hardware & Steel Co.
24.12
Check Total:
1,011.47
201513
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Training/Ed. -
Residence Inn San Ramon
922.50
Check Total:
922.50
201514
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Travels & Mee
Rohnert Park Chamber of Commer
25.00
201514
09/14/2011
General Fund
T &E - City Represesentation-
Rohnert Park Chamber of Commer
25.00
201514
09/14/2011
General Fund
City Council -T &M- Stafford
Rohnert Park Chamber of Commer
25.00
201514
09/14/2011
General Fund
Planning /Travels & Mee
Rohnert Park Chamber of Commer
125.00
Check Total:
200.00
201515
09/14/2011
General Fund
Cash
Rohnert Park Disposal
134,298.59
201515
09/14/2011
General Fund
Refuse Franchise Fees
Rohnert Park Disposal
- 86,644.25
201515
09/14/2011
General Fund
Admin. Svcs.-Refuse Rechg
Rohnert Park Disposal
- 30,325.49
201515
09/14/2011
General Fund
Admin. Svcs. -Refuse Rechg
Rohnert Park Disposal
- 17,328.85
Check Total:
-0.00
201516
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
269.75
AP'- Checks for
Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM)
paaP 17
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201516
201516
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
General Fund
General Fund
Fire Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
201516
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
39.51
201516
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
- 253.13
201516
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
-25.92
26.63
201516
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
11.48
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
25.05
Check Total:
93.37
201517
201517
09/14/2011
09/14/2011
General Fund
General Fund
Police /Uniforms
Santa Rosa Uniform &.Career Ap
Police /Uniforms
Santa Rosa Uniform & Career Ap
19.42
14.05
Check Total:
33.47
201518
09/14/2011
General Fund
Mark Sharp
•
196.85
Check Total:
196.85
201519
09/14/2011
General Fund
Police /Training/Ed. -
SHERATON GATEWAY
287.46
Check Total:
287.46
201520
09/14/2011
General Fund
Non- Department /Community Pro
Sign A Rama
170.82
Check Total:
170.82
201521
09/14/2011
General Fund
Codding Center / Vehicle Repai
SIGN DYNAMICS
271.25
Check Total:
271.25
201522
09/14/2011
General Fund
Angela D. Smith
400.00
Check Total:
400.00
201523
09/14/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Smothers
9.41
Check Total:
9.41
201524
09/14/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
Randy Snyder
641.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM )
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name
Amount
General Fund
201527
Check Total:
641.00
201525 09/14/2011 General Fund Publ Works Gen /Clothing Allo Sunset Linen Service
145.30
Check Total:
145.30
201526 09/14/2011 General Fund Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm Syar Industries, Inc.
273.97
Check Total:
273.97
201527
09/14/2011
General Fund
201527
09/14/2011
General Fund
201528
09/14/2011
General Fund
201529
09/14/2011
General Fund
201530
09/14/2011
General Fund
201531
09/14/2011
General Fund
201532
09/14/2011
General Fund
201533
09/14/2011
General Fund
201534
09/14/2011
Capital Projects Fund
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 -.10:52 AM )
Community Event.Contracts
Laure Tatman
Community Event.Contracts
Laure Tatman
Check Total:
Police Nehicle Repai
Tire Distribution Systems, Inc
Check Total:
Fire Nehicle Repai
TRACE ANALYTICS
Check Total:
City Hall Bldg/Facilty
Universal Building Services
Check Total:
Police /Training/Ed. -
DALE UTECHT
Check Total:
Police /Training/Ed. -
DALE UTECHT
Check Total:
Police /Training/Ed. -
DALE UTECHT
Check Total:
Sonoma Mtn Village Project
Vargas Greenan Architecture
2,170.60
63.20
2,233.80
1,092.32
1,092.32
610.00
610.00
1,150.00
1,150.00
180.00
180.00
180.00
180.00
180.00
180.00
400.00
Page 19.
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201540
09/14/2011
Capital Projects Fund
201540
Check Total:
400.00
201535
09/14/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
West Cal Tractor
630.83
201535
09/14/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
West Cal Tractor
504.47
201535
09/14/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
West Cal Tractor
50.76
201536 09/14/2011 General Fund
201537 09/14/2011 Capital Projects Fund
201538 09/14/2011 General Fund
201539 09/14/2011 General Fund
201540
09/14/2011
Capital Projects Fund
201540
09/14/2011
Utility Construction Fund
201540
09/14/2011
Capital Projects Fund
201540
09/14/2011
Capital Projects Fund
201540
09/14/2011
Capital Projects Fund
201541
09/14/2011
Capital Projects Fund
201542
09/15/2011
General Fund
201542
09/15/2011
General Fund
201542
09/15/2011
General Fund
201542
09/15/2011
General Fund
Check Total:
Publ Works Gen /Small Tools West County Tool &Equipment
Check Total:
Ranch Verde Trafic Signal Whitlock & Weinberger Transpor
Check Total:
Police /Training/Ed. -
Sports Center /Professional
JASON WILLIAMS
Check Total:
Winning Edge Sports Training
Check Total:
2011 Various St Overlay
Winzler & Kelly
Eastside Trunk Swr Proj- Phase2
Winzler & Kelly
2011 Various St Overlay
Winzler & Kelly
Public Facils.Finance Plan Adm
Winzler & Kelly
Copeland Creek Bike Path Recon
Winzler & Kelly
Stadium Area Specific Plan Your Other Office, Inc.
P E R S Payable CALPERS
Pers- Survivorship CALPERS
Pers Redeposit Payable CALPERS
P/S Personnel /Pers/Employee CALPERS
1,186.06
52.99
52.99
2,157.50
2,157.50
480.00
480.00
158.40
158.40
1,588.75
1,021.00
1,897.25
5,067.00
959.54
Check Total: 10,533.54
537.41
Check Total: 537.41
378,134.57
336.00
2,835.30
386.18
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM ) Page 20
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201542
09/15/2011
General Fund
P/S Personnel /Pers/Employer
CALPERS
1,298.80
Check Total:
382,990.85
201543
09/15/2011
General. Fund
Pers- Survivorship
CALPERS
20.00
201543
09/15/2011
General Fund
P E R S Payable
CALPERS
17,984.54
Check Total:
18,004.54
201544
09/19/2011
General Fund
Emplyee Benfits /Life Ins /Sala
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO
1,034.69
201544
09/19/2011
General Fund
Standard Ins Payable
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO
4,117.11
Check Total:
5,151.80
201545
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Friedman's
89.08
201545
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Friedman's
83.16
Check Total:
172.24
201546
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
-22.36
201546
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
148.19
201546
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
14.40
201546
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
293.90
Check Total:
434.13
201547
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm.
Home Depot
61.92
201547
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Home Depot
215.60
201547
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
Home Depot
52.56
Check Total:
330.08
201548
09/21/2011.
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Small Tools
Mateo Tools
105.85
Check Total:
105.85
201549
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
Pep Boys
49.09
Check Total:
49.09
201550
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Power Industries
229.22
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 21
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM ) Page 22
Check Total:
229.22
201551
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water /Clothing Allowance
Red Wing Shoes
277.30
Check Total:
277.30
201552
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
Redwood Lock & Key
163.78
Check Total:
163.78
201553
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec. Departm
Reliable Hardware & Steel Co.
10.31
Check Total:
10.31
201554
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
81.26
Check Total:
81.26
201555
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
WaterNehicle Repairs
Sebastopol Bearing & Hydraulic
86.47
Check Total:
86.47
201556
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water /Clothing Allowance
Sunset Linen Service
49.59
Check Total:
49.59
201557
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Water Entr. /Spec Dept Equ
Wyatt Irrigation Supply Inc.
58.10
Check Total:
58.10
201558
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Small Tools
Mateo Tools
105.85
Check Total:
105.85
201559
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. Bldg/Facilty
Petersen Tractor Service, LLC
603.75
Check Total:
603.75
201560
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Clothing Allow
Sunset Linen Service
35.00
201560
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. /Clothing Allow
Sunset Linen Service
22.70
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM ) Page 22
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
57.70
201561
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Sewer Entr. Bldg/Facilty
United Forest Products, Inc.
84.09
Check Total:
84.09
201562
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Refuse Col Entr /Professional
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LL
9,644.96
Check Total:
9,644.96
201563
09/21/20.11
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LL
2,685.20
Check Total:
2,685.20
201564
09/21/2011
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
Clearwire Legacy LLC
- 130.50
201564
09/21/2011
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
Clearwire Legacy LLC
319.25
201564
09/21/2011
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
Clearwire Legacy LLC
422.30
201564
09/21/2011
General Fund
Refundable Deposits
Clearwire Legacy LLC
683.66
Check Total:
1,294.71
201565
09/21/2011
General Fund
Animal Shltr Training Fee Dep
Chris Kessler
60.00
Check Total:
60.00
201566
09/21/2011
General Fund
Planning /Contractual S
Whitlock & Weinberger Transpor
3,055.50
Check Total:
3,055.50
201567
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Spec. Departm
Michael Bates
47.49
Check Total:
47.49
201568
09/21/2011
General Fund
Finance /Contractual S
Accountemps
1,710.00
Check Total:
1,710.00
201569
09/21/2011
General Fund
Pac /Postage
Ad Vantage Marketing
130.40.
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 23
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
201570 09/21/2011 General Fund
201571 09/21/2011 General Fund
201571 09/21/2011 General Fund
201572 09/21/2011 General Fund
201573 09/21/2011 General Fund
201574 09/21/2011 General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575.
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201575
09/21/2011
General Fund
201576
09/21/2011
General Fund
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Check Total:
Police /Armory Alameda County Sheriffs Offic
Check Total:
H Pool /Spec. Departm
H Pool /Spec. Departm
City Hall Bldg/Facilty
American Red Cross
American Red Cross
Aramark Uniform Services
Check Total:
Check Total:
Non- Department /Dues & Subscr Association of Bay Area Govern
Check Total:
Data Processing /Telephone AT &T
Check Total:
Pac /Telephone
R.P. Gymnasium /Telephone
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Telephone
Sign/Telephone
R.P. Gymnasium /Telephone
Animal Shelter /Telephone
Data Processing /Telephone
Ps Main Station /Telephone
Publ Works Gen /Telephone
P/S Bldg -South /Telephone
P/S Bldg -North /Telephone
Ps Main Station /Telephone
P/S Bldg -North /Telephone
Animal Control/Medications
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
Blue Sky Veterinary Hospital
Check Total:
130.40
300.00
300.00
54.00
27.00
81.00
61.28
61.28
8,148.00
8,148.00
5,248.82
5,248.82'
5.19
5.19
5.20
109.78
58.94
30.06
29.91
16.21
29.58
30.48
29.89
41.76
65.30
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM ) Page 24
457.49
75.00
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 25
Check Total:
Check Total:
75.00
201577
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Training & Ed
JAMES BRADY
201582
112.00
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
Butler Schein Animal Health Su
298.01
Check Total:
112.00
201578
09/21/2011
General Fund
Sports Center /Contractual S
Pete Breeland
General Fund
78.00
CA Department of Justice
209.00
Check Total:
78.00
201579
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Eye Care
Dr. James E. Bruns
Cal -Line Equipment, Inc
150.00
201584
09/21/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
Cal -Line Equipment, Inc
Check Total:
150.00
201580
09/21/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
Buchanan Food Service
679.09
201580
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Bldg/Facilty
Buchanan Food Service
54.62
Check Total:
733.71
201581
09/21/2011
General Fund
Legal Services /Professional
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LL
21,553.76
201581
09/21/2011
General Fund
Rent Appeals Bd /Professional
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LL
530.40
201581
09/21/2011
General Fund
Legal Services /Professional
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LL
2,699.84
201581
09/21/2011
General Fund
Legal Services /Professional
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LL
3,627.00
201581
09/21/2011
Capital Projects Fund
Wilfred - Dowdell Dist.Spec.Plan
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LL
1,419.60
201581
09/21/2011
General Fund
Legal Services /Professional
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LL
2,491.84
201581
09/21/2011
Capital Projects Fund
Sonoma Mtn Village Project
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LL
1,328.60
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 25
Check Total:
33,651.04
201582
09/21/2011
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
Butler Schein Animal Health Su
7.57
201582
09/21/2011
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
Butler Schein Animal Health Su
298.01
Check Total:
305.58
201583
09/21/2011
General Fund
Personnel /Recruitment/F
CA Department of Justice
209.00
Check Total:
209.00
201584
09/21/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
Cal -Line Equipment, Inc
489.73
201584
09/21/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
Cal -Line Equipment, Inc
-2.83
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 25
Check Number Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
Check Total:
486.90
201585
09/21/2011
General Fund
Community Event.Contracts .
William Campbell
500.00
Check Total:
500.00
201586
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Self - Insured
Carl's Body Shop
1,971.09
201586
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Vehicle Repai
Carl's Body Shop
540.00
Check Total:
2,511.09
201587
09/21/2011
General Fund
Finance /Travels & Mee
CGSA
35.00
201587
09/21/2011
General Fund
City Manager /Travels & Mee
CGSA
35.00
201587
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Training & Ed
CGSA
35.00
201587
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Training & Ed
CGSA
35.00
201587
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Training & Ed
CGSA
35.00
Check Total:
175.00
201588
09/21/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Spec. Departm
Comcast
13.41
Check Total:
13.41
201589
09/21/2011
General Fund
Fire /Contractual S
Community Economic Solutions
3,000.00
Check Total:
3,000.00
201590
09/21/2011
Utility Construction Fund
Tank 1 &2 Ladders safety upgrade
The Community Voice
780.00
201590
09/21/2011
General Fund
Spay/Neuter Voucher $2
The Community Voice
500.00
201590
09/21/2011
General Fund
PW -Storm Drains /Spec. Depa
The Community Voice
624.00
Check Total:
1,904.00
201591
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
Complete Welders Supply
92.92
Check Total:
92.92
201592
09/21/2011
General Fund
Community Event.Contracts
JEROME DALBECK
200.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 26
Check Number Check Date Fund Name
Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Check Total:
201593 09/21/2011 General Fund Non - Department /Community Pro Display Sales
Check Total:
201594 09/21/2011 General Fund Sports Center /Contractual S Denise Drake
201594 09/21/2011 General Fund R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S Denise Drake
Check Total:
201595 09/21/2011 General Fund Pac /Facility Repa DTC Grip & Electric
Check Total:
201596 09/21/2011 General Fund Pers'L & Purch /Recruitment/G EMPLOYMENT SCREENING
Check Total:
201597
09/21/2011
General Fund
H Pool Bldg/Facilty
Eureka Oxygen Co.
201597
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
Eureka Oxygen Co.
Check Total:
201598
09/21/2011
General Fund
City Hall Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
201598
09/21/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
201598
09/21/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium Bldg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
201598
09/21/2011
General Fund
Burt/Ave Rec Cr Bidg/Facilty
First Alarm Sercurities Servic
Check Total:
201599
09/21/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
First Choice
201599
09/21/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
First Choice
Check Total:
201600
09/21/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Spec. Departm
Frizelle -Enos Company
Check Total:
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM }
200.00
681.10
681.10
149.50
26.00
175.50
168.72
168.72
110.00
110.00
126.36
527.35
653.71
1,272.00
75.00
75.00
84.00
1,506.00
41.50
37.50
Page 27
79.00
149.61
149.61
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201601
09/21/2011
General Fund
Community Event.Contracts
Edward John Ghilardi Jr
500.00
Check Total:
500.00
201602
09/21/2011
General Fund
Street Lighting /Spec. Departm
Grainger, Inc.
337.64
201602
09/21/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Grainger, Inc.
14.97
201602
09/21/2011
General Fund
Street Lighting /Spec, Departm
Grainger, Inc.
61.21
201602
09/21/2011
General Fund
Center Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
22.56
201602
09/21/2011
General Fund
R.P. Gymnasium /Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
46.58
201602
09/21/2011
General Fund
Benecia Pool Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
326.89
201602
09/21/2011
General Fund
Ps Main Station Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
24.88
201602
09/21/2011
General Fund
Ps Main Station Bldg/Facilty
Grainger, Inc.
44.40
Check Total:
879.13
201603
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
Hansel Ford
330.26
Check Total:
330.26
201604
09/21/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
45.57
201604
09/21/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
115.10
201604
09/21/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Shelter Food
Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, In
136.71
Check Total:
297.38
201605
09/21/2011
General Fund
Storm Drains /Contractual S
The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control
95.00
Check Total:
95.00
201606.
09/21/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
Home Depot
74.67
201606
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Fac Maint/Non-
Home Depot
79.33
201606
09/21/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
Home Depot
28.97
201606
09/21/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup
Home Depot
4.17
Check Total:
187.14
201607
09/21/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Horizon Distributors Inc.
64.59
201607
09/21/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Horizon Distributors Inc.
149.05
201607
09/21/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Horizon Distributors Inc.
52.32
Check Total:
265.96
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 28
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201613
09/21/2011
General Fund
201613
09/21/2011
201608
09/21 /2011
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
IDEXX Distribution, Inc.
95.95
Check Total:
95.95
201609
09/21/2011
General Fund
Rec Ref Clearing
Ryan Kurada
59.00
Check Total:
59.00
201610
09/21/2011
Capital Projects Fund
LED Street Light Conversion
Leotek Electronics
156.24
201611 09/21/2011 General Fund
201611 09/21/2011 General Fund
201612 09/21/2011 General Fund
201613
09/21/2011
General Fund
201613
09/21/2011
General Fund
201613
09/21/2011
General Fund
201613
09/21/2011
General Fund
201614 09/21/2011 General Fund
201614 09/21/2011 General Fund
201614 09/21/2011 General Fund
201615 09/21/2011 General Fund
201616 09/21/2011 General Fund
Check Total:
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai Lithia Motors Payment Processi
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai Lithia Motors Payment Processi
Check Total:
Non - Department /Training & Edu Jerrod Marshall
Check Total:
Sports Center /Contractual S
Martial Arts Academy
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
Martial Arts Academy
Sports Center /Contractual S
Martial Arts Academy
Sports Center /Contractual S
Martial Arts Academy
Publ Works Gen /Small Tools
Police /Small Tools
Fire /Small Tools
Econ Develp /Paper Supplie
Check Total:
Matco Tools
Matco Tools
Matco Tools
Check Total:
ERIC MATZEN
Check Total:
National Document Solutions, L
156.24
23.87
9.77
33.64
1,000.00
1,000.00
1,261.65
552.50
129.00
182.00
2,125.15
105.85
105.85
105.82
317.52
65.00
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM ) Page 29
65.00
30.70
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Check Total:
30.70
201617
09/21/2011
General Fund
Pac/Pasco /Advertising/P
North Bay Bohemian
254.89
Check Total:
254.89
201618
09/21/2011
General Fund
Non - Department /Audit Fees
Odenberg Ullakko Muranishi & C
1,398.75 .
Check Total:
1,398.75
201619
09/21/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Spec. Departm
Office Depot
-84.35
201619
09/21/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
Office Depot
20.60
201619
09/21/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
Office Depot
29.97
201619
09/21/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
Office Depot
85.99
201619
09/21/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
Office Depot
4.49
201619
09/21/2011
General Fund
City Hall /Office Supplie
Office Depot
22.90
Check Total:
79.60
201620
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Vehicle Repai
Pep Boys
19.52
Check Total:
19.52
201621
09/21/2011
General Fund
City Manager /Contractual Se
Petersen, Gayle
157.50
Check Total:
157.50
201622
09/21/2011
General Fund
Non -Dept Leases/Transfer Out
PNC Equipment Finance
7,809.42
Check Total:
7,809.42
201623
09/21/2011
General Fund
Non - Department /Professional
Price, Paige & Company
3,030.00
Check Total:
3,030.00
201624
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police , /Office Supplie
The Printer Doctor
253.89
Check Total:
253.89
201625
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
786.17
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21 /2011 - 10:52 AM)
Page 30
Check Number
Check Date
Fund Name
Account Name
Vendor Name
Amount
201625
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,045.43
201625
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,090.47
201625
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
856.81
201625
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
986.02
201625
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
862.63
201625
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Gas & Oil
Redwood Coast Petroleum
1,490.91
Check Total:
7,118.44
201626
09/21/2011
General Fund
Park Maint /Spec. Departm
Redwood Lock & Key
34.99
201626
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Spec. Departm
Redwood Lock & Key
3.80
201626
09/21/2011
General Fund
Burt/Ave Rec Cr Bldg/Facilty
Redwood Lock & Key
12.21
201626
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
Redwood Lock & Key
28.80
201626
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Spec. Departm
Redwood Lock & Key
5.43
Check Total:
85.23
201627
09/21/2011
General Fund
Spay/Neuter Voucher $2
Dr. Joel Reif
580.00
Check Total:
580.00
201628
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Self - Insured
Reliable Auto Glass
845.35
Check Total:
845.35
201629
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Reliable Hardware & Steel Co.
378.81
Check Total:
378.81
201630
09/21/2011
General Fund
Library /Spec. Departme
Republic ITS Inc
193.43
201630
09/21/2011
General Fund
PW- Traffic Signals /Contractua
Republic ITS Inc
390.00
Check Total:
583.43
201631
09/21/2.011
General Fund
Animal Control/Medications
ROADRUNNER PHARMACY
90.49
Check Total:
90.49
201632
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Haz Materials
Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.
310.44
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 31
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM ) Page 32
Check Total:
310.44
201633
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
18.05.
201633
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
83.83
201633
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
19.34
201633
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
7.37
201633
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
70.99.
201633
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Miscellaneous
Santa Rosa Auto Parts
-10.52
Check Total:
189.06
201634
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Clothing Allo
Santa Rosa Shoes
300.00
Check Total:
300.00
201635
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police /Uniforms
Santa Rosa Uniform & Career Ap
65.05
Check Total:
65.05
201636
09/21/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
Shamrock Materials
556.76
Check Total:
556.76
201637
09/21/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Sign A Rama
190.96
201637
09/21/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Sign A Rama
17.36
201637
09/21/2011
General Fund
Community Event/Spec. Dep
Sign A Rama
17.36
Check Total:
225.68
201638
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Smothers
37.16
20I638
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
Smothers
-20.61
Check Total:
16.55
201639
09/21/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
Soiland Co., Inc.
10.00
Check Total:
10.00
201640
09/21/2011
General Fund
Pac /Facility Repa
SOUND EXPRESSIONS
772.55
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM ) Page 32
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name. Vendor Name Amount
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM ) Page 33
Check Total:
772.55
201641
09/21/2011
General Fund
Animal Control /Spec Dept Equip
Stafford Medical
340.25
Check Total:
340.25
201642
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Clothing Allo
Sunset Linen Service
112.30
Check Total:
112.30
201643
09/21/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike /Spec. Departm
Syar Industries, Inc.
320.01
Check Total:
320.01
201644
09/21/2011
General Fund
Pac/Rental /Spec Dept Equ
Theatre Bay Area Advertising
55.00
Check Total:
55.00
201645
09/21/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
DENISE THURMAN
187.20
Check Total:
187.20
201646
09/21/2011
General Fund
Police Nehicle Repai
Tire Distribution Systems, Inc
535.44
Check Total:
535.44
201647
09/21/2011
General Fund
R.P. Comm. Cntr /Contractual S
Pat Tyler
390.00
Check Total:
390.00
201648
09/21/2011
General Fund
Data Processing /Spec. Departm
The UPS Store
187.15
Check Total:
187.15
201649
09/21/2011
General Fund
Transient Occupancy Tax
Mark Verdu
293.05
Check Total:
293.05
201650
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Victory Auto Plaza
108.38
201650
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen Nehicle Repai
Victory Auto Plaza
9.30
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM ) Page 33
Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Amount
Report Total: 2,619,070.40
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 34
Check Total:
117.68
201651
09/21/2011
General. Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
West Cal Tractor
7.45
201651
09/21/2011
General Fund
Streets & Bike / Landscape Sup
West Cal Tractor
39.63
201651
09/21/2011
General Fund
PW- Landscape/Landscape Sup
West Cal Tractor
108.26
Check-Total:
155.34
201652
09/21/2011
Capital Projects Fund
Copeland Creek Bike Path Recon
Winzler &Kelly
181.50
201652
09/21/2011
General Fund
Publ Works Gen /Fuel Tank Mai
Winzler & Kelly
6,652.80
Check Total:
6,834.30
201653
09/21/2011
Utility Construction Fund
Tank 1 &2 Ladders safety upgrade
Your Other Office, Inc.
211.41
Check Total:
211.41
201654
09/21/2011
Utility Fund
Ref Deposits -Meter Deposits
National MS Society
2,500.00
Check Total:
2,500.00
Report Total: 2,619,070.40
AP - Checks for Approval ( 09/21/2011 - 10:52 AM) Page 34
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
BILLS FOR ACCEPTANCE
September 27, 2011
Check Numbers: 5840 - 5843 $ 34,947.89
Dated: Sept. 14, 2011 - Sept. 21, 2011
TOTAL $ 34,947.89
Accounts Payable
Checks for Approval
User: ccolbum
Printed: 09/21/2011 - 10:46 AM
Check Number. Check Date Fund Name Account Name
5840 09/14/2011 Redevelopment General Fund Travels & Meetings
5841 09/14/2011 Low & Moderate Income Housing Contractual Services
5842 09/21/2011 Redevelopment General Fund Contractual Services
5843 09/21/2011 Redevelopment General Fund Community Ctr Retrofit
Vendor Name Amount
Busniess Card
115.74
Check Total:
115.74
SO CO Adult & Youth Developmen
32,500.00
Check Total:
32,500.00
Foxtail Irrevocable Trust
2,272.15
Check Total:
2,272.15
Vaider Inc
60.00
Check Total:
60.00
Report Total: 34,947.89
AP - Checks for Approval.( 09/21/2011 - 10:46 AM ) Page 1
Agenda Packet Preparation TlMELINES for Regular City COlll1cil Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no later
than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
_ Agenda Items w/attachments via email and hard copy to City Clerk DUE no later than NOON
Two (2) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later than
Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on Wednesday
afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with Rohnert Park
MuniciDal Code Section 2.08.050
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 7.C.1
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-89
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
Department:
Submitted By:
Submittal Date:
Agenda Title:
September 27,2011
Development Services
Eydie Tacata, Management Analyst
September 16,2011
Authorizing Submittal of Application for Central Rohnert Park to be
Designated a Priority Development Area
Requested Council Action:
Consider resolution authorizing submittal of application to FOCUS to designate Central Rohnert
Parkas a Priority Development Area.
Summary:
City staff requests the City Council consider the attached resolution authorizing the submittal of
an application for Central Rohnert Park, a 282-acre area bounded to the west by Highway 101,
Santa Alicia Drive and A vram Avenue to the south, and the Northwest Pacific Railroad tracks to
the east, to be designated as a Priority Development Area (PDA).
PDA designation would allow the City to access funding administered through regional planning
agencies including the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, which are expected to direct
more transportation and other funding to "focused growth" areas as a way to meet greenhouse
gas reduction goals of the Sustainable Communities Planning Act (SB 375). The City Council
reviewed a draft of the application at the September 13,2011 meeting and directed staff to
finalize the application and prepare a resolution for their consideration authorizing the submittal
of the application to FOCUS.
Staff recommends that the Council approve the attached resolution. PDA applications are
accepted on a rolling basis. With an approved resolution, the application will be submitted in
time to be reviewed by the FOCUS program staff during the October - December 2011 quarter.
Enclosures: Resolution No. 2011-89
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
( ) Regular Time
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: (X) Consent Item
(X) Approval ( ) Public HearingRequired
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( )Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
(Revised 031309) JH:TG-S:05-b
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO DESIGNATE
CENTRAL ROHNERT PARK AS A PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA
WHEREAS, the FOCUS program, a regional planning initiative of the Association of
Bay Area Governments and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in coordination with
the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and Bay Conservation and Development
Commission (collectively, the "regional agencies") supports a future regional development
pattern that is compact and connected;
WHEREAS, the regional agencies invite local governments in the nine county San
Francisco Bay Area to identify areas of focused growth within their communities as "Priority
Development Areas";
WHEREAS, the regional agencies are developing incentives and are committed to
providing technical assistance to designated Priority Development Areas to assist communities
working to advance focused growth;
WHEREAS, a Priority Development Area must meet all of the following criteria: (a)
within an existing community, (b) near existing or planned fixed transit (or served by
comparable bus service) and ( c) is planned, or is planning, for more housing;
WHEREAS, City of Rohnert Park staff have identified a 282-acre area in Rohnert Park
referred to as "Central Rohnert Park," bounded by Highway 101 to the west, Santa Alicia Drive
and Avram Avenue to the south, and the Northwest Pacific Railroad tracks to the east, that meets
all of the criteria as Priority Development Area;
WHEREAS, City staff have prepared an application to FOCUS to designate Central
Rohnert Park as a Priority Development Area, which was considered by the Rohnert Park City
Council at a public meeting on September 13,2011.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert
Park that it authorizes the submittal of an application to FOCUS to designate Central Rohnert
Park as a Priority Development Area.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 2ih day of September, 2011, by the
City Council of the City of Rohnert Park.
. ATTEST:
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
9ity Clerk
Mayor
Agenda Packet Preparation TlMELlNES for Regular City Council Meetings {This sectionfor City Clerk Use Only}
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
- Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no 09/27/11 City Council Agenda
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
- Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization", ITEM NO. 7.C.2
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
· Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets RESOLUTION NO. 2011-90
with 2 sets single-sided & ] 8 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
- Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no. later
than Tuesday morning One (1) weel{ prior to Council meeting date
- Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-] 73
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
September 27,20] ]
Department:
Development Services
Submitted By:
Marilyn Ponton, Planning and Building Manager
Submittal Date:
August 30, 20] 1
Agenda Title:
Authorizing and Approving an Agreement with North Fork
Associates for Planning Consulting Services
Requested Council Action: Consideration of Resolution Approving an Agre~ment with
North ForkAssociates for Planning Consulting Services
Summary:
The City has major land development projects in Specific Plan / Planned Development Areas
underway or scheduled for hearing, action or implementation in 20 1 ] /20 1 2. The City anticipates
completing environmental documents, entitlements, and annexations on these areas within the
next year. Rohnert Park remains unique in the concurrent processing of more than one major
project along with the implementation of recently approved projects.
This work load, combined with the current staffing levels in the Development Services
Department (one planner), creates a need for additional planning resources to meet the City's
goals for economic development. Saving a few months or years on the development project
entitlement process means earlier creation of jobs, earlier demand for supplies and materials
from our local suppliers, and ultimately more tax revenue for the City.
The planning work associated with processing specific plans and planned developments is fully
reimbursed by the developers of these projects with no General Fund impact.
The City has three basic alternatives to meet the current planning needs:
Alternatives:
· Create a new position, and recruit and hire an experienced planner to assist with the
advanced planning workload. The advantage of this option is that the cost to the
developers might be slightly lower. The disadvantages of this are the difficulty in
creating a new position, the six months it takes to complete a recruitment, the eventual
layoff if the workload decreases, and the potential ofa General Fund impact ifthere are
lulls in the workload. The estimated cost is approximately $ I 24,000 per year. This
option is not recommended.
· Delay processing of specific plans and planned developments. This option is not
recommended as it may expose the City to liability and it also delays progress of
development projects such as the University District Specific Plan, and the Northeast
Specific Plan and implementation of the Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan.
· Contract for limited planning services including environmental review during the
concurrent processing of major projects until the projects are approved. When work is
complete, then the outside professionals are easily released. Fluctuations in work load
are easily addressed as the outside professionals will not be given work unless there is
more than City staff can process in a timely manner. This method has the advantage that
we can control what the outside professionals work on to make sure the work is
reimbursed and there is no General Fund Impact.
North Fork Associates has been providing limited contract planning services to the City on the
Specific Plans including environmental review.
The attached agreement with North Fork Associates will provide development review and
general planning services as specified in the proposal. The value of the contract is not to exceed
$45,000. The cost of these services would be fundedas follows:
Development Deposit Accounts: $35,000. These are costs fully reimbursed by developers at no
cost to City and would be charged to the respective developments and projects.
General Plan Maintenance Fund (Development Fees): $10,000. This task is proposed to amend
the Zoning Ordinance as required to achieve consistency with current laws.
Enclosures: Resolution, Agreement
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: (X) Consent Item
(X) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Detennination by Council
( ) City Comments:
( ) Regular Item
Per City Manager's review and direction for distribution ofthis agenda item.
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH
NORTH FORK ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. DBA NORTH FORK ASSOCIATES
FOR PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain general planning consulting services;
WHEREAS, North Fork Associates has the experience and expertise to provide said
services; and
WHEREAS, North Fork Associates has provided similar services to the City for
planning and environmental review services.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City ofRohnert
Park that it does hereby authorize and approve an agreement by and between N0I1h Fork
Associates, a California corporation, and the City of Rohnert Park, a municipal corporation, for
planning consulting services.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and
directed to take all actions to effectuate this agreement for and on behalf of the City of Rohnert
Park, including execution, if necessary, in substantially similar form to the agreement attached
hereto as Exhibit "A," subject to minor modifications by the City Manager or City Attorney.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 2ih day of September, 20 I ].
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
City of Rohnert Park
130 Avram Ave.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the day of
2011, by and between the CITY OF ROI-INERT PARK ("City"), a Califomiamunicipal
corporation, and North Fork Environmental, Inc. dba North Fork Associates ("Consultant"), a
California corporation.
Recitals
WHEREAS, City desires to obtain Planning Consulting Services in connection with
several development projects and General Plan consistency updates;
WHEREAS, Consultant hereby warrants to the City that Consultant is skilled and able to
provide such services desclibed in Section 3 of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, City desires to retain Consultant pursuant to this Agreement to provide the
services described in Section 3 of this Agreement.
Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above, and all defined tenns set
forth in such recitals and in the introductory paragraph preceding the recitals, are hereby
incorporated into this Agreement as if set forth herein in full.
2. Proiect Coordination.
A. City. The City Manager or his/her designee, shall represent City for all
purposes under this Agreement. The Planning and Building Manager is hereby designated as the
Project Manager. The Project Manager shall supervise the progress and execution of this
Agreement.
B. Consultant. The Consultant shall assign Cathleen Spence-Wells to have
overall responsibility for the progress and execution of this Agreement for Consultant.
3. Scope and Performance of Services
A. Scope of Services. Subject to such policy direction and approvals as the
City through its staff may determine from time to time, Consultant shall perform the services set
out in the "Scope of Work" attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
B. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are to commence upon
receipt of a written notice to proceed from City, but in no. event prior to receiving a fully
executed agreement from City and obtaining and delivering the required insurance coverage, and
[1]
Revised: 10/271] 0
EXHIBIT A
satisfactory evidence thereof, to City. The services of Consultant are to be completed as directed
by the City's Project Manager. Consultant shall perfoml its services in accordance with the
schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference. Any changes to
these dates in either this Section 3 or Exhibit A must be approved in writing by the Project
Manager.
C. Standard of Quality. City relies upon the professional ability of
Consultant as a material inducement to entering into this Agreement. All work perfOlmed by
Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with all applicable legal requirements
and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in
Consultant's field of expertise.
4. Compensation and Method of Payment.
A. Compensation. The compensation to be paid to Consultant, including
both payment for professional services and reimbursable expenses, shall be at the rate and
schedules attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by reference. However, in no
event shall the amount City pays Consullant exceed Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00).
Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of unsatisfactory work,
even if such defects were lmown to the City at the time of payment.
B. Timing of Payment. Consultant shall submit itemized monthly statements
for work performed. City shall make payment, in full, within thirty (30) days after approval of
the invoice by the Project Manager.
C. Changes in Compensation. Consultant will not undertake any work that
will incur costs in excess of the amount set forth in Paragraph 4(A) without prior written
amendment to this Agreement.
D. Taxes. Consultant shall pay all taxes, assessments and premiums under
the federal Social Security Act, any applicable unemployment insurance contributions, Workers
Compensation insurance premiums, sales taxes, use taxes, personal property taxes, or other taxes
or assessments now or hereafter in effect and payable by reason of or in connection with the
services to be performed by Consultant.
E. No Overtime or Premium Pay. Consultant shall receive no premium or
enhanced pay for work normally understood as ovel1ime, i.e., hours that exceed forty (40) hours
per work week, or work performed during non-standard business hours, such as in the evenings
or on weekends. Consultant shal1not receive a premium or enhanced pay for work performed on
a recognized holiday. Consultant shall not receive paid time off for days not worked, whether it
be in the form of sick leave, administrative leave, or for any other form of absence.
F. Litigation Support. Consultant agrees to testify at City's request if
litigation is brought against City in connection with Consultant's work product. Unless the
action is brought by Consultant or is based upon Consultant's negligence, City will compensate
Consultant for the preparation and the testimony at Consultant's standard hourly rates, if
requested by City and not part of the litigation brought by City against Consultant.
-2-
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27110
5. Amendment to Scope of Work. City shall have the right to amend the Scope of
. Work within the Agreement by written notification to the Consultant. In such event, the
compensation and time of performance shall be subject to renegotiation upon written demand of
either party to the Agreement. Consultant shall not commence any work exceeding the Scope of
Work without Plior written authorization from the City. Failure of the Consultant to secure
City's written authorization for extra or changed work shall constitute a waiver of any and all
right to adjustment in the contract price or time due, whether by way of compensation,
restitution, quantum meruit, etc. for work done without the appropriate City authorization.
6. Tenn. This Agreement shall commence upon its execution by both parties and
shall continue in full force and effect until completed, anlended pursuant to Section 21, or
otherwise telminated as provided herein.
7. Inspection. Consultant shall furnish City with every reasonable opportunity for
City to ascertain that the services of Consultant are being performed in accordance with the
requirements and intentions of this Agreement. All work done and all materials furnished, if
any, shall be subject to the Project Manager's inspection and approval. The inspection of such
work shall not relieve Consultant of any of its obligations to fulfill the Agreement as prescribed.
8. Ownership of Documents. Title to all plans, specifications, maps, estimates,
reports, manuscripts, drawings, descriptions and other final work products compiled by the
Consultant under the Agreement shall be vested in City, none of which shall be used in any
mmmer whatsoever, by any person, film, corporation, or agency without the expressed written
consent of the City. Basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations, and other data
prepared or obtained under the Agreement shall be made available, upon request, to City without
restriction or limitations on their use. Consultant may retain copies of the above-described
information but agrees not to disclose or discuss any information gathered, discussed or
generated in any way through this Agreement without the written pelmission of City during the
term of this Agreement, unless required by law.
9. Employment of Other Consultants, Specialists or Experts. Consultant will not
employ or otherwise incur an obligation to pay other consultants, specialists or experts for
services in connection with this Agreement without the prior written approval of the City.
10. Conflict ofInterest.
A. Consultant covenants and represents that neither it, nor any officer or
principal of its firm, has, or shall acquire any investment, income, business entity, interest in real
property, or other interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the
interests of City, hinder Consultant's performance of services under this Agreement, or be
affected in any manner or degree by performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant
further covenants that in the performance of the Agreement, no person having any such interest
shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor without the express
written consent of the City. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest, or the
appearance of any conflicts of interest, with the interests of the City in the performance of the
Agreement.
B. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the
Political Reform Act because Consultant:
-3-
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27/]0
(1) will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to its
rendition of infOlmation, advice, recommendation, or counsel independent of the control and
direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal contract monitoring; and
(2) possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond
the rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel. (2 Cat Code Regs.
S 18700(a)(2).)
11. Liability of Members and Employees of City. No member of the City and no
other officer, elected official, employee or agent of the City shall be personally liable to
Consultant or othelwise in the event of any default or breach of the City, or for any amount
which may become due to Consultant or any successor in interest, or for any obligations directly
or indirectly incW"red under the terms of this Agreement.
12. Indenmity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant hereby agrees to
defend (by counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City,
its officers, elected officials, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, danlages, costs, liabilities, or obligations brought on account of or arising out
of any acts, enors, or omissions of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, and
subcontractors undertaken pursuant to this Agreement excepting liabilities due to the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of City. The City has no liability or responsibility for any
accident, loss, or damage to any work performed under this Agreement whether prior to its
completion and acceptance or otherwise. Consultant's. duty to indemnify and hold harmless, as
set forth herein, shall include the duty to defend as set forth in California Civil Code S 2778.
This indenmification obligation is not limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type
of damages or compensation payable by or for Consultant under Worker's Compensation,
disability or other employee benefit acts or the terms, applicability or limitations of any
insurance held or provided by Consultant and shall continue to bind the parties after
termination/completion ofthis agreement. This indemnification shall be regardless of and not in any
way limited by the insmance requirements ofthis contract. This indemnification is for the full period of
time allowed by law and shall survive the termination of this agreement.
13. Consultant Not an Agent of City. Consultant, its officers, employees and agents
shall not have any power to bind or commit the City to any decision.
14. Independent Contractor. It is expressly agreed that Consultant, in the
performance of the work and services agreed to be performed by Consultant, shall act as and be
an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of City; and as an independent
contractor, Consultant shal1 obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue
to City's employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such
rights.
15. Compliance with Laws.
A. General. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to
comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations.
Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has and shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep
in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, insurance
and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant
-4-
1208604vl 80078/00]2
Revised: 10127/10
shall maintain a City business license. The City is not responsible or liable for Consultant's
failure to comply with any or all of the requirements contained in this paragraph.
B. Workers' Compensation. Consultant certifies that it is aware of the
provisions of the California Labor Code which require every employee to be insured against
liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self~insurance in accordance with the
provisions of that Code, and Consultant certifies that it will comply with such provisions before
commencing performance of the Agreement and at all times in the performance of the
Agreement.
C. Prevailing Wage. Consultant and Consultant's subconsultants (if any)
shall, to the extent required by the California Labor Code, pay not less than the latest prevailing
wage rates to workers and professionals as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations of
the State of California pursuant to California Labor,Code, Pm17, Chapter 1, Article 2. Copies of
the applicable wage determination are on file at the City's office ofthe City Clerk.
D. Injury and Illness Prevention Program. Consultant certifies that it is aware
of and has complied with the provisions of California Labor Code S 6401.7, which requires
every employer to adopt a written injury and illness prevention program.
E. City Not Responsible. City is not responsible or liable for Consultant's
failure to comply with any and all of its requirements under this section and Agreement.
F. Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant and Consultant's insurance company
agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, elected officials, employees,
agents and volunteers for losses paid under Consultant's workers' compensation insurance policy
which arise from the work perfOlmed by Consultant for the City.
16. Confidential Information. All data, documents, discussions or other information
developed or received by or for Consultant in performance of this Agreement me confidential
and not to be disclosed to any person except as authorized by the City, or as required by law.
17. Assigllll1ent; Subcontractors; Employees
A. Assigllll1ent. Consultant shall not assign, delegate, transfer, or convey its
duties, responsibilities, or interests in this Agreement or any right, title, obligation, or interest in
or to the same or any part thereof without the City's prior written consent. Any assigllll1ent
without such approval shall be void and, at the City's option, shall immediately cause this
Agreement to terminate.
B. Subcontractors; Employees. Consultant shall be responsible for
employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services of Consultant hereunder.
No subcontractor of Consultant shall be recognized by the City as such; rather, all subcontractors
are deemed to be employees of the Consultant, and Consultant agrees to be responsible for their
performance. Consultant shall give its personal attention to the fulfillment of the provisions of
this Agreement by all of its employees and subcontractors, if any, and shall keep the work under
its control. If any employee or subcontractor of Consultant fails or refuses to carry out the
provisions of this Agreement or appears to be incompetent or to act in a disorderly or improper
-5-
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: ] 0/27/10
manner, it shall be discharged immediately from the work under this Agreement on demand of
the Project Manager.
18. Insurance. Without limiting consultant's indemnification provided hereIn,
Consultant shall comply with the requirements set forth in Exhibit C to this Agreement.
19. Termination of Agreement: Default.
A. This Agreement and all obligations hereunder may be tenninated at any
time, with or without cause, by the City upon 5-days' written notice to Consultant.
B. If Consultant fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement
within the time and in the manner herein provided or otherwise violate any of the terms of this
Agreement, in addition to all other remedies provided by law, City may tenninate this
Agreement immediately upon written notice. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to
receive as full payment for all services satisfactorily rendered and expenses incurred hereunder,
an amount which bears the same ratio to the total fees specified in the Agreement as the services
satisfactorily rendered hereunder by Consultant bear to the total services otherwise required to be
performed for such total fee; provided, however, that the City shall deduct from such amount the
amount of damages, if any, sustained by City by virtue of the breach of the Agreement by
consultant. .
C. In the event this Agreement is terminated by City without cause,
Consultant shall be entitled to any compensation owing to it hereunder up to the time of such
termination, it being understood that any payments are full compensation for services rendered
prior to the time of payment.
D. Upon tennination of this Agreement With or without cause, Consultant
shall turn over to the City Manager immediately any and all copies of studies, sketches,
drawings, computations, and other data, whether or not completed, prepared by Consultant or its
subcontractors, if any, or given to Consultant or its subcontractors, if any, in connection with this
Agreement. Such materials shall become the pelmanent property of the City. Consultant,
however, shall not be liable for the City's use of incomplete materials nor for the City's use of
complete documents ifused for other than the project contemplated by this Agreement.
20. Suspension. The City shall have the authority to suspend this Agreement and the
services contemplated herein, whoHy or in pmi, for such period as it deems necessary due to
unfavorable conditions or to the failure on the part of the Consultant to perform any provision of
this Agreement. Consultant will be paid for satisfactory Services performed through the date of
temporary suspension.
21. Merger: Amendment. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive
statement of the agreement between the City and Consultant and shall supersede all prior
negotiations, representations, or agreements, either Wlitten or oral. This document may be
amended only by written instrument, signed by both the City and Consultant. All provisions of
this Agreement are expressly made conditions.
-6-
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: 1 0/27/1 0
22. Interpretation. This Agreement shall be interpreted as though it was a product of
ajoint drafting effort and no provisions shall be interpreted against a party on the ground that
said party was solely or primarily responsible for drafting the language to be interpreted.
23. Litigation Costs. If either party becomes involved in litigation arising out of this
Agreement or the performance thereof, the court in such litigation shall award reasonable costs
and expenses, including attorneys' fees, to the prevailing party. In awarding attorneys' fees, the
court will not be bound by any court fee schedule, but shall, if it is in the interest of justice to do
so, award the full amount of costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees paid or incurred in good faith.
24. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
25. Written Notification: Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval or
communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other pm1y shall be in
writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice,
demand, etc. shall be addressed to the other pm1y at the address set forth below. Either party
may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address. Notice shall be
deemed communicated within 72 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this
section.
If to City:
City Manager
City of Rohnert Park - City Hall
130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
If to Consultant:
Cathleen Spence-Wells, President
North Fork Associates
1167 High Street
Auburn, CA 95603
26. Consultant's Books and Records.
A. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices,
vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for
services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to the City and all documents and records
which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years,
or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this
Agreement.
B. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this
Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business
hours, upon written request by the City Attorney, City Auditor, City Manager, or a designated
representative of any of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City
for inspection when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed
upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this
Agreement.
-7-
1208604v] 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27/10
C. The City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers,
require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be
maintained in the City Manager's office.
27. Agreement Binding. The tenns, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement
shall apply to, and shall bind, the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, assigns, and
subcontractors of both pm1ies.
28. Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant is an equal opportunity employer
and agrees to comply with all applicable state and federal regulations governing equal
employment opportunity. Consultant wil1 not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment because of race, age, sex, creed, color, sexual orientation, marital status or national
origin. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensme that applicants are treated during such
employment without regard to race, age, sex, creed, color, sexual orientation, marital status, or
national origin. Such action shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following:
employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; lay-offs or
termination; rates of payor other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including
apprenticeship. Consultant further agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees
and applicants for employment, notices setting f0l1h the provisions of this nondiscrimination
clause.
29. City Not Obligated to Third Parties. The City shall not be obligated or liable for
payment hereunder to any party other than the Consultant.
30. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy
hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder.
31. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions contained herein shall for any
reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, then such provision or
provisions shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions hereof, and such invalidity,
illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof, and this Agreement
shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had not been contained.
herein.
32. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated
herein by this reference:
A.
B.
C.
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
Exhibit C:
Scope of Work
Compensation/Fee Schedule
Insurance Requirements
33. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of
which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties
when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this
Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.
34. News Releases/Interviews. All Consultant and subconsultant news releases,
media interviews, testimony at hearings and public comment shall be prohibited unless expressly
authorized by the City.
-8-
1208604 v I 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27/10
35. Applicable Law~ Venue. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted
according to California law. In the event that suit shall be brought by either party hereunder, the
parties agree that trial of such action shall be held exclusively in a state com1 in the County of
Sonoma, California.
36. Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of one of the
pm1ies represents that he or she is duly authorized to sign and deliver the Agreement on behalf of
such party and that this Agreement is binding on such party in accordance with its terms.
37. STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTEREST. If City determines Consultmlt
comes within the definition of Consultant under the Political RefOlm Act (Government Code
S871 00), Consultant shall complete and file and shall require any other person doing work under
this Agreement to complete and file a "Statement of Economic Interest" with the Clerk of the
City of Rohnert Park disclosing Consultant and/or such other person's financial interests.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date
first above written.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
CONSULTANT (North Fork Associates)
BY~
Title: r~~ . reSt'
Date: ~ 30
By:
City Manager Gabriel Gonzalez
Date:
Per Resolution No. 2011- _adopted by the Rohnert Park
City Council at its meeting of
CONSULTANT
By:
Title:
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: .
City Attorney
ATTEST:
By:
City Clerk
-9-
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27110
north
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
::as~(),.l;llt:;<-
Fork
City of Rolmert Park
Contract Planning Services
North Fork Associates (NFA) proposes to provide contract staffing services to assist the City of
Rohnert Park with the project management and entitlement processing tasks for projects
currently under review at the City. The projects under review include the Northeast Specific
Plan and revisions to the University District Specific Plan (approved in 2006). The projects are
in differing phase of environmental and application review. Based upon review of the project
files and discussion with City staff, the entitlements, current status and anticipated tasks
associated with each of the projects are listed below. In addition, NFA proposes to provide
current and advanced planning services as requested by the Planning and Building Manager.
Northeast Specific Plan (NESP)
Requested entitlements:
. Annexation
. General Plan Amendment
. Prezoning
. Specific Plan
. Final Development Plan
. Tentative Map
. Environmental Impact Report
. Development Agreement
Status:
The staff comments on the second Administrative Final EIR have been compiled. NF A will
provide direction on behalf of the City to ESA in order to complete the FEIR. Next submittal is
the screencheck FEIR. As directed by the Planning and Building Manager, General Plan
amendment exhibits, Specific Plan edits and LAFCO applications will be prepared by or
reviewed by NFA for completion and adequacy. Assist Plannihg and Building Manager in
review of outstanding application items and plans toward completion of the Specific Plan and
EIR process and preparation for public hearings - draft and final staff reports and exhibits,
hearing noticing, and presentation materials.
University District Specific Plan (UD)
Requested entitlements:
· General Plan Amendments
· Specific Plan Amendments
[10]
Revised: 08/24/11
· Tentative Map
· Development Area Plans
· Development Agreement Amendments
· CEQA compliance
Status:
Tbe University District Specific Plan application was approved by the City in 2006. The
applicant's are preparing submittals for revisions to the Specific Plan, Development Area Plans,
Development Agreement and revised tentative maps. Specific Plan amendment will require
amendments to the General Plan. Updates to the phasing and infrasb'ucture plans are currently
being prepared. The applications contemplated will require review of the previously-certified
EIR for consistency with proposed actions and determination of appropriate CEQA document.
Assist Planning and Building Manager in review of revised application items, completion of the
application process and preparation for public hearings - draft and final staff reports and
exhibits, hearing noticing, and presentation materials.
General Plan Amendments
Proposed Action:
· Prepare amendments to General Plan consistent with City Council action
Status:
The City's requirement for public art with new projects has been rescinded however the
General rlan has not been formally amended to be consistent with the City Council action. In
addition, the Bike Master Plan has been updated. That update is not reflected in the
Transportation Element. Prepare the amendments, appropriate CEQA document, draft and
final staff reports and exhibits for Planning Commission and City Council hearings.
Zoning Ordinance Amendments
Proposed Action:
· Prepare amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
Status:
Several Zoning Ordinance amendments are proposed to streamline the permit procedures for
new commercial uses in the City. In addition, revisions to IncIusionary Housing provisions are
proposed. Prepare the amendments, appropriate CEQA document, draft and final staff reports
and exhibits for Planning Commission and City Council hearings.
NFA Scope of Services
NFA's Principal Planner, Cathy Spence-Wells and other NFA staff as necessary will assist City
staff with the application processing andEIR preparation management for the specific plan and
-11-
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27/10
planned development projects outlined above and with any other current and advanced
planning tasks as assigned by the Plmming and Building Manager.
Ms. Spence-Wells will be the principal contact for communications with City staff, the
applicants, and the EIR consultants. She will ensure that all parties are kept informed
and on schedule with the work program and deliverables. She will consult City staff
through every phase of the CEQA and development review processes; and will
promptly relate the relevant information to appropriate parties to ensure accuracy and
internal consistency.
Specific PlansjPlanned Developments
Throughou t the development review process, NF A will act as a "clearinghouse" for all
. environmental documents, technical reports, correspondence, and scheduling/ coordination of
meetings required to take the projects through the public hearing and EIR certification process.
NF A's proposed scope of work would include, but not be limited to, the following tasks:
.
EIR Preparation and Management Provide oversight and direction to SESP and NESP
applicants and environmental consultants throughout completion of the EIR process,
serving as primary contact between the City, the applicant and EIR consultant. NF A
will review environmental documentation completed to date and comment on the
environmental documents on behalf of the Planning Division. NF A will also compile all
EIR review comments completed by the various City departments and assist with the
interdepartmental coordination of EIR-related comments as needed. Take primary role
in oversight and management of the EIR preparation; ensure routing of submittals to the
appropriate departments and agencies; and provide EIR status/schedule updates.
Ensure departmental files provide a legally-adequate EIR administrative record. For
other applications complete or review environmental documentation to ensure
compliance with CEQA and other state regulations.
.
Application Coordination Assist staff in ongoing processing and management of the
applications; update and organize all project files; review and comment on all project
submittals; and be responsible for scheduling regular meetings on an individual and
group basis between City staff, applicant and other agencies as needed to ensure steady
progress of the application processing. This would include communication and
coordination with each of the City departments and agencies in a manner that will
provide consistent responses and direction to the project applicant.
Development Agreement Provide support to City staff with Development Agreement
negotiations and completion of draft DAs.
.
Staff Report Preparation Prepare staff reports for Planning Commission and City Council
hearing, conditions of approval and findings, as directed by the Planning and Building
Manager.
.
Public Hearing Preparation Prepare public presentation materials, including staff reports
and exhibits for the Planning Commission and City Council hearings.
-12-
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27!l 0
.
Annexation Prepare annexation applications (NESP) and coordinate process through
LAFCO.
.
Project Implementation Review and provide input on all supporting plans, programs and
actions to ensure that the project is consistent with City policies and environmental
mitigation requirements. Coordinate update of Specific Plan, General Plan Diagram
and Zoning Map to reflect final decision on project.
Current and Advanced Planning Services
Upon request by Cily Planning and Building Manager, North Fork Associates staff will provide
current and advanced planning conlTact services. These services can assist staff with processing
project applications, environmental review, staff report preparation, project implementation
and advance planning project support.
Schedule and Costs
Charges for work completed under this scope of services will be billed according to North Fork
Associates' revised fee schedule which reflects a 5% hourly rate reduction for the Planning staff.
As the time to complete the tasks associated with these projects is unknown and will vary by
project, NF A proposes to complete tasks on a time and materials basis.
-13-
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27110
EXHIBIT B
COMPENSATION / FEE SCHEDULE
north
, .....,.,-]1(:.
tOI-Co'L...,
Revised Fee Schedule for City of Rohnert Park
Title
Hourly Rate
PLANNING
Principal Planner
137.75
Planning Manager
123.50
Senior Planner
114.00
Associate Planner
90.25
Assistant Planner
71.25
Resource Specialist
85.50
NATURAL RESOURCES
Senior Biologist
120.00
Associate Biologist
95.00
Assistant Biologist
75.00
Field Technician
60.00
PROJECT SUPPORT
CAD/GIS/Mapping Specialist
85.00
Graphics Technician
70.00
Project Administrator
85.00
Project Editor
85.00
Word Processing/Production/Admin Support
55.00
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Subcontractors and direct, non-salary costs associated with document production, reproduction,
distribution, and project communications include a 10% administration charge.
Mileage is charged at the IRS approved rate.
114]
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27/10
EXHIBIT C
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS for Consultant Services Agreement
Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of the Work, Consultant will maintain insurance in
conformance with the requirements set forth below. Consultant will use existing coverage to comply with
these requirements. If that existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth here, Consultant
agrees to amend, supplement or endorse (he existing coverage to do so. Consultant acknowledges that the
insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage
required. Any insurance proceeds available to City in excess of the limits and coverage required in this
agreement and which is applicable to a given loss, will be available to City.
Consultant shall provide the following types and amounts ofinsurance:
General Liability Insurance using Insurance Services Office "Commercial General Liability" policy form
CG 0001 or the exact equivalent. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. There shall be no cross
liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another. Limits are subject to review but in
no event less than $2,000,000 (Two Million Dollars) per occurrence.
Business Auto Coverage on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 0001 including symboll (Any Auto)
or the exact equivalent. Limits are subject to review, but in no event to be less than $2,000,000 (Two
Million Dollars) per accident. If Consultant owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non-
owned auto endorsement to the general liability policy described above. If Consultant or Consultant's
employees will use perspnal autos in any way on this project, Consultant shall provide evidence of
personal auto liability coverage for each such person.
Workers Compensation on a state-approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by law
with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 (One Million Dollars) per accident or disease.
Excess or Umbrella Liability Insurance (Over Primary) ifused to meet limit requirements, shall provide
coverage at least as broad as specified for the underlying coverages. Any such coverage provided under
an umbrella liability policy shall include a drop down provision providing primary coverage above a
maximum $25,000 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary but covered by the umbrella.
Coverage shall be provided on a "pay on behalf' basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy
limits. Policy shall contain a provision obligating insurer at the time insured's liability is determined, not
requiring actual payment by the insured first. There shall be no cross liability exclusion precluding
coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another. Coverage shall be applicable to City for
injury to employees of Consultant, subconsultants or others involved in the Work. The scope of coverage
provided is subject to approval of City following receipt of proof of insurance as required herein. Limits
are subject to review but in no event less than $2,000,000 (Two Million Dollars) per occurrence.
Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form
coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors Or omissions of the consultant and "Covered
Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this
agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 (One Million Dollars) per claim and in the
aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of" the insured and must include a provision establishing the
insurer's duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this
agreement.
[15]
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27/10
Insurance procured pursuant to these requirements shall be written by insurers that are admitted carriers
in the state of California and with an A.M.Bests rating of A- or better and a minimumjinancial size VII.
General conditions pertaining to provision of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and City
agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Consultant.
1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required
herein to include as additional insureds the City, its officers, elected officials, employees, agents,
and volunteers using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 20 10 or an approved equivalent. If
completed operations coverage is excluded, the policy must be endorsed to include such coverage.
Consultant also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise.
2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant,
or Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss.
Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any
insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise.
3. The worker's compensation policy is to be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation. The insurance
company, in its endorsement, agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers,
elected officials, employees, agents, and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of this policy .
which arise from the work performed by the named insured for the City.
4. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contractor and available or applicable to this
agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this
Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of
such insurance coverage.
5. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include
any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in
writing.
6. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called
"third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the
insured or of any contractor or subcontractor.
7. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional
requirements by the City, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of
coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect
City's protection without City's prior written consent.
8. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of celiificates of insurance
evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's
general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In
the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is
canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty,
to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement
and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by
Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at City option.
[16]
1208604v] 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27!l 0
9. Certificate(s) are to ref1ect that the insurer wi]] provide 30 days notice to City of any cancellation of
coverage. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any
exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes
no obligation, or that any party will "endeavor" (as opposed to being required) to comply with the
requirements of the certificate.
10. It is acknowledged by the patties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be
provided by Consultant or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, non-
contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self insurance available to City.
11. Consultant agrees to ensure that subcontractors; and any other party involved with the project who
is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance
coverage required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and
assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in confonnity with the .
requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with
subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review.
12. Consultant agrees not to self-insure or to use any self-insured retentions or deductibles on any
portion of the insurance required herein and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor,
subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance
of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self-insure its obligations to City. If
Consultant's existing coverage includes a deductible or self-insured retention, the deductible or self-
insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the
Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self-insured retention,
substitution of other coverage, or other solutions.
13. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and
types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of
such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City will
negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City.
14. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been
executed immediately upon any paliy hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in
furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement.
15. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City t.o inform
Consultant of non-compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional
obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard.
] 6. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents
face an exposure fi'om operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies
whether or not the agreement is canceled or terminated for any' reason. Termination of this
obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect.
17. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of ins.urance required herein expiring during the term of
this Agreement have. been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same
coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A
[17]
1208604vl 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27/1 0
coverage binder or letter fi'om Consultant's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate
of insurance and/or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to
the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five days of the expiration of the
coverages.
18. The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of
Consultant under this agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity
defenses under such laws with respect to City, its officers, elected officials, employees, agents, and
volunteers.
19. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as
limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally
provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of
clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be
limiting or all-inclusive.
20. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in
this agreement and are intended by the pmiies here to be interpreted as such.
21. The requirements in this Section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to
the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this
Section.
22. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any
way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Consultant for the cost of additional
insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with
reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying
with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other
amounts with respect thereto.
23. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant
arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by
such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims
if they are likely to involve City.
[18]
1208604 v I 80078/0012
Revised: 10/27/10
CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTANT
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the t\-QS -\~~n+
duly authorized representative of the firm of ~o\~ ~ rv:... e f\\J \ (\)1\ MQn\c-.\ lIne
whose address is \ \~ I \1\S" ~tcl-\ f\'->bvrn Qj\ C\-S<.oo3
neither I nor the above firm I nere represent has: J
, and a
<;\!Jo- NQr'\'-\' f"2-.~ .v~
, and that I.SS{)G\~,......-....)
a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent
fee, or other consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide
employee working solely for me or the above consultant) to solicit to
secure this Agreement.
b) Agreed, as an express or inlplied condition for obtaining this contract, to
employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with
carrying out the Agreement; or
c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any finn, organization or person (other than a
bona fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) any
fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in
connection with, procuring or carrying out the Agreement;
Except as here expressly stated (if any);
I acknowledge that this certificate is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both
criminal and civil.
'6/~ j/l
Date /
--_.---~._---- -
SIgnature
[19]
1208604vI80078/0012.
Revised: 10/27/1 0
r--.~.. Agenda Packet Preparation TIME LINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances
& Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email to review for "approvals as to form"
DUE no later than NOON Two (2) Tuesdays prior to Council meeting dates
. Agenda Items with related attachments via email to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting dates
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk
no later than Tuesday mornings One (1) week prior to Council meeting dates
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed
on Wednesday afternoons One (1) week prior to Council meeting dates for
compliance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.050
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 7.e.3
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-91
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
September 27,2011
Department:
Public Works
Submitted By:
Angie Smith, Purchasing Agent
Submittal Date:
September 15, 2011
Agenda Title: Award of Purchase for a Harben Unit for the Public Works Department
Requested Council Action: Pass Resolution Awarding the Purchase for a Harben Unit for
the Public Works Department
Background: The City currently only has a high volume, low pressure vac-con that is primarily
used for cleaning large sewer lines. Due to the high volume the vac-con pushes it can blowout
the smaller sewer lines in residential areas. The sewer department does not have the equipment
needed to flush the smaller sewer lines throughout the City. Other City's have multiple volume
sewer cleaners for maintaining their sewer systems.
Having one piece of equipment to handle sewer cleaning is very difficult when the vac-con is
down for repairs or service. Staff is currently not able to respond immediately to backflow issues
afterhours as not all personnel have the required license to operate the vac-con. This makes
service on backflow issues limited to normal business hours. The vac-con is also so large that it
limits the places it can travel to perform necessary sewer cleaning.
Purpose/Justification of Recommended Action: A Harben Unit is a high velocity sewer
cleaner, similar to the City's current Vac-Con truck. It is a separate unit that is installed on the
chassis of a Class C Truck. The Harben Unit is designed for cleaning small sewer lines varying
in size from 6" to 10" it is equipped with a jet cam color video inspection system and does not
require a special driver's license to operate.
The Harben Unit also complies with the City's Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP)
Equipment List, Mandated and Adopted by City Council on 7-14-2009.
The purchase of the Harben Unit will improve staff response time, allow staff to safely clean
smaller sewer lines and increase the life expectancy of the vac-con, which is generally 15 years
and costs approximately $250,000. Having the Harben Unit as the first responder will prolong
the life of the vac-con by 5 to 7 years.
Fiscal Impact/Financing: The Public . Works Department budgeted in fiscal year 2011-2012,
$80,000.00 to purchase a Harben Unit. These funds are available under City account number
510-7200-400-9510.
Summary: As per Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 3.04.090, bids were mailed out on
August 19,2011, posted at three City facilities as well as on the City's website. The bid opening
was held on September 12, 2011. At said bid opening two (2) proposals were received.
Bids received:
Contractor
American Hydro-Vac Equipment
Irvine, CA
Contract Total
$64,977.40
3T Equipment
Santa Rosa, CA
$66,336.90
Upon review of bids by staff, it was determined that awarding the contract to the lowest bidder
would be the most cost advantageous to the City.
Conclusion: Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the
purchase contract and other pertinent documents for the Harben Unit, in the 'amount of
$64,977.40.
Enclosures: Resolution
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: (X) Consent Item
(X) Approval () Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended () Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
( ) Regular Time
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AWARDING THE PURCHASE OF A
HARBEN UNIT FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, proposals were solicited by the City Council for a Harben Unit for the
Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, two (2) proposals were received by the City Manager and reviewed with the
City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Robnert
Park that it does hereby authorize and approve the purchase contract for the aforementioned
Harben Unit for the Public Works Department to the most responsive bidder, compatibility and
other factors considered, to wit:
Contractor Name
Contract Total
American Hydro- V ac Equipment Co.
Irvine, CA
$64,977.40
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed
to execute documents pertaining same for and on behalf of the City of Robnert Park.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 27th day of September 2011.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
JH-S:05-d
Agenda Packet Preparation TIME LINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda items to City Manager via em ail for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park Municioal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
9/27/2011 CDC Agenda Item
ITEM NO. 7.D.l
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-07
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
September 27, 2011
Department:
Administration
Submitted By:
Linda T. Babonis, Economic Development Manager
Submittal Date:
September 20, 2011
Agenda Title:
Amended Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule
Requested Council Action: Adopt an Amended Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule
Pursuant to Section 34169(g) of the California Health and Safety Code
Summary: On August 23,2011, the Community Development Commission adopted an Enforceable
Obligation Payment Schedule pursuant to Section 34169 (g) of the California Health and Safety Code.
Following adoption of the Schedule, staff identified certain errors included in the Schedule adopted
August 23. The proposed corrections are reflected in the attached Amended Enforceable Obligation
Payment Schedule and are summarized below;
1) Items 11, 17, 18, 19, and 21 in the initial Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule have been
corrected to reflect more accurate information, including the timing and specific amounts of payments.
These items are now listed in the amended schedule as items 11, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
2) Items 20 and 22 have been deleted from the fIrst Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule due to
the fact that these projects are complete and there will be no FY 2011/12 expenditures to report.
3) Item 21 has been added to the Amended Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule to reflect an
obligation that was inadvertently left off of the schedule.
Enclosures: Resolution, Amended Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule
GENERAL COUNSEL'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by General Counsel.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION:
(x) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Submitted with Comment ( ) Policy Determination by CDC
(x) Consent Item () Regular Item
( ) Not Recommended
( ) City Comments:
Per Executive Director's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item.
(Revised 031309) JH:TG-S:05-b
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ADOPTING AN AMENDED ENFORCEABLE
OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO SECTION 34169(g) OF THE
CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park
("Commission") is a redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California
Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code ~ 33000 et seq.) ("CRL") and has been
authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to
action of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park ("City Council" or "City," as applicable);
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the CRL, the City Council approved and adopted a
Redevelopment Plan for the Rohnert Park Redevelopment Project ("Project") on July 14, 1987,
by Ordinance No. 479, (as amended to date, "Redevelopment Plan"), and the Commission is
vested with the responsibility for implementing and carrying out the Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Commission is currently in the process of carrying out the goals and
objectives of the Redevelopment Plan by continuing to eliminate blight; increase, improve and
preserve the supply of affordable housing in the community; stimulate and expand economic
growth and employment opportunities by revitalizing properties and businesses within the
Project; and alleviate deficiencies in public infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, in connection with approval and adoption of the State Budget for Fiscal.
Year 2011-12, the California Legislature has approved, and the Governor has signed
(i) ABXl 26 (Stats.2011, chap. 5, "ABXI26"), which immediately, and purportedly
retroactively, suspends otherwise legal redevelopment activities and incurrence of indebtedness
and dissolves redevelopment agencies effective October 1, 2011, and requires redevelopment
agencies to adopt a payment schedule for all agency enforceable obligations in conformance with
Section 34l69(g) of the Health and Safety Code by August 28, 2011, and submit such schedule
to the county auditor-controller, the State Controller and the State Department of Finance (the
"Dissolution Act"); and (ii) ABXl 27 (Stats.2011, chap. 6, "ABXl 27"), which allows
communities to avoid the consequences of the Dissolution Act and continue their redevelopment
agency if the community enacts an ordinance agreeing to comply with the alternative voluntary
redevelopment program described in Section 2 of ABXl 27 adding Part 1.9 (commencing with
section 34192) of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code (the "Alternative Redevelopment
Program"); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 34169(g)(2) of the Health and Safety Code, the
Commission adopted an Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule on August 23, 2011, and
posted the Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule on the City's website; and
OAK #4812-6734-3370 v2
1
WHEREAS, Commission staff have prepared an Amended Enforceable Obligation
.PciYment Schedule to correct certain errors in the Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule
adopted on August 23.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. The Commission hereby adopts the Amended Enforceable Obligation
Payment Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 2. The Commission Secretary is hereby directed to post a copy of the
Amended Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule to the City's web site and to transmit a
copy of the Amended Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule to the State Department of
Finance, the State Controller and the Sonoma County Auditor in accordance with Section
34169(g)(2) of the Health and Safety Code.
DUL Y AND REGULARLY ADOPTED by the Community Development Commission
of the City of Robnert Park this 2ih day of September, 20 II.
Chairperson
ATTEST:
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
General Counsel
OAK #4812-6734.3370 v22
EXHIBIT A
ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE
[Insert]
Exhibit A
OAK #4812-6734-3370 v2
Name of Redevelopment Agency: Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park
Project Area(s) Rohnert Park Redevelopment Project
AMENDED ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Per AB 26 - Section 34167 and 34169 ( *)
Page 1 of 1 Pages
Total Outstanding
Debtor Obligation
as of June 30,
Total Due During
Payments by Month (August 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011)
Aug"
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Project Name / Debt Obligation
Payee
Description
2011
Fiscal Year
Bonds issue to fund non - housing projects &
1
11991 Tax Allocation Bonds
20% set-aside
580,000
0
1 580,000
580,000
2
1999 Tax Allocation Bonds
-
Bonds issue to fund non - housing projects
31,880,000
395,000
395,000
395,000
3
2001 Tax Allocation Bonds
Bonds refunding issue
8,506,306
969,468
228,634
228,634
4
2007R Tax Allocation Bonds
Bonds issue for non- housing projects
38,086,897
973,918
486,959
486,959
5
2007H Tau Allocation Bonds
Bonds issue to fund housing projects
25,586,091
856,582
508,991
508,991
Loan from City for acquisition and construction
of Performing Arts Center (CDC Reso No. 200
-
6
Performing Arts Center Project
City of Rohnert Park
05)
3,602,300
276,750
93,375
93,375
7
Community Center Complex
City of Rohnert Park
Ground Lease (CDC Reso No. 2003 -08)
2,699,000
241,0001
20,083
20,083
20,083
20,083
20,083
100,415
-
Housing & Redevelopment
8
Direct Staff Cost
Manager
Administration
3,006,504
111,352
9,279
9,279
9,279
9,279
9,279
46,395
Support costs (e.g., Executive Director, CFO,
IT, etc.) Allocated under Public Improvement &
Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreemen
9
Administration Fees
City of Rohnert Park
(CDC Reso No. 2011 -02)
27,737,586
1,027,318
513,659
513,659
10
1 Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
Same
City Attorney (CDC Reso No 2010 -20)
1,620,000
60,000
1 5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
25,000
December property tax increment, estimated
11
County Property Tax Admin Fee
County of Sonoma
fee
4,716,117
174,671
170,671
170,671
12
Trustee Fees
Union Bank
Bondlssues
216,000
8,000
122
2,541
61
311
61
3,096
Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co
Commission share of auditing costs (City Reso
13
Auditing Fees
LLP
No. 2011 -28)
216,000
8,000
6,135
6,135
Estimated pass through payments for 11112 t
14
Pass-through Obligation
County of Sonoma
year - Health & Safety 33401
98,799,534
3,659,242
3,659,242
3,659,242
Estimated pass through payments for 11/12 -
15
Pass-through Obligation
County of Sonoma
Health & Safety 33676
40,778,640
1,510,320
1,510,320
1,510,320
Sonoma Mountain Business
Payment obligation under Grant Agreement
16
Grant
Cluster
(CDC Reso No. 2010 -18)
444,000
444,000
1
222,000
222,000
Golf course CIP Fund contribution per Lease
17
Fund Contribution
CourseCo.
Agmtw /CourseCo. (Tenn May 2021)
200,000
20,000
1,667
1,667
1,667
1,667
1,667
8,335
Seifel Consulting (Bond
Development Feasibility Study of (2) sites (CD
18
Feasibility Study
proceeds - reimbursement)
Reso No. 2010 -17)
39,717
39,717
2,157
4,500
8,000
8,000
10,000.
32,657
Demolition, expenses for consultant & staff
time. Done under Public Improvement &
DAMA Construction (Bond
Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreemen
19
lSouthwest Station
Proceeds - Reimbursement)
(CDC Reso No. 2011 -02)
9,000
9,0001
9,000
9,000
Retrofit Studies. Expenses for staff time. Done
under Public Improvement & Affordable
PAC, Sports & Community Ctr (Project
Bond Proceeds -
Housing Reimbursement Agreement (CDC
20.
#2010 -14)
Reimbursement
Reso No. 2011-02)
30,151
30,151
151
1,800
2,700
2,700
1, 2,700
10,051
Feasibility Studies. Expenses for consultants
-
Various consultant
and staff time. Done under Public Improvemen
Recr & Community Facility
payees /Bonds proceeds -
& Affordable Housing Reimbursement
21
Improvements (Project # 2011 -01)
reimbursement
Agreement (CDC Reso No. 2011-02)
69,065
69,065
1,965
26,500
9,000
12,900
10,400
60,765
Totals - This Page
288,822,908
10,883,554
2,249,008
.71,370
55,790
281,940
6,012,592
8,670,700
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Totals - Page 2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
Totals - Page 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Totals - Page 4
Totals - Other Obligations
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Totals -All Pages
288,822,908
10,883,554
2,249,008
71,370
55,790
281,940
6,012,592
8,670,700
Agenda Packet Preparation TlMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Qrdinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney viaemail for review and approval as to form DUE
no later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda items to City Manager via em ail for his review and responding "email
authorization", synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and
. an em ail copy to the City Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to C;:ouncil meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
9/27/11 Joint City CounciI/CDC
Agenda Item
ITEM NO.8
ORDINANCE NO. 839
(ADOPTION)
CITY RESOLUTION
NO. 2011-92
CDC RESOLUTION
NO. 2011-08
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
CITY COUNCIL AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AGENDA ITEM TRANS MITT AL REPORT
Meeting Date:
September 27,2011
Department:
Administration
Submitted By:
Linda Babonis, Economic Development Manager
Submittal Date:
September 19, 20 II
Agenda Item:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CONTINUATION
ORDINANCE AND REMITTANCE AGREEMENT
Requested Council Action:
I. Waive Full Reading and Adopt Ordinance by Reading Title: Ordinance of the City of
Rohnert Park Determining to Comply with the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment
Program Pursuant to Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code in
Order to Permit the' Continued Existence and Operation of the CommunitY" Development
Commission of the City of Rohnert Park
2. Adopt a resolution approving a Remittance Agreement between the City and the
Community Development Commission pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section
34194.2
Requested Community Development Commission Action:
1. Adopt a resolution approving a Remittance Agreement between the City and the
Community Development Commission pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section
. 34194.2
Page 1 of 4
OAK #4820-0383-1562 v2
Summary
On June 29, 2011, the Governor signed into law companion bills ABXl 26 and ABXl 27
relating to redevelopment. ABXl 26 ("AB 26") immediately suspends agency activities and
eliminates redevelopment agencies effective October I, 2011. ABXl 27 ("AB 27") exempts
agencies from suspension and dissolution under AB 26 if a city adopts an ordinance agreeing to
comply with what AB 27 calls the "Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program," under
which participating communities "voluntarily" pay additional tax increment to school entities
and special districts (the "AB 27 Ordinance").
Prior to considering the Remittance Agreement, the City Council will be considering for
second reading and adoption the AB 27 Ordinance. If the City Council adopts the AB 27
Ordinance, it is agreeing to make annual payments ("remittancestt) to the County Auditor-
Controller beginning in FYII-12, and in all succeeding years the Community Development
Commission ("Commission") is in existence. AB 27 also authorizes, pursuant to Section
34194.2 of the Health and Safety Code, the City and Commission to enter into an agreement
whereby the Commission may transfer a portion of its tax increment to the City, in an
amount not to exceed the annual remittance required that year. The attached Remittance
Agreement will enable the Commission to annually transfer a portion of its tax increment to
the City in an amount not-to-exceed the required annual remittance.
Although the California Supreme Co~rt issued an order in California Redevelopment
Association, et at. v. Ana Matosantos, et al. which stays parts of ABXl 26 and almost all
of ABXl 27, at this time it is still unclear what actions a redevelopment agency or city
should be taking during pendency of the stay. Given the uncertainty surrounding the current
status of redevelopment, it is recommended that the City Council and Commission approve the
attached Remittance Agreement to ensure that the City and Commission are in the best possible
position regarding the on-going future of redevelopment once the Supreme Court issues its final
ruling, which is expected by January 15,2012.
In Fiscal Year 2011-12, the total amount of all remittance payments for all agencies statewide is
$1.7 billion. In subsequent years, the amount is currently anticipated to be $400 million per year.
For the first year, each agency's share of the $1.7 million is determined by the amount of tax
increment received in Fiscal Year 2008-2009. The State Department of Finance determines the
amount of each city's annual payment; however, a city may appeal the amount under certain
conditions. The City has appealed the $4,011,622 estimated amount determined by the
Department of Finance to be paid by the City for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 and is awaiting the
Department of Finance's response.
Discussion
Because of the importance under AB 27 of fully describing all debts in the. 20 II Statement of
Indebtedness which must be filed by no later than October I, 2011, the California
Redevelopment Association recommends that the best course for cities that are adopting an AB
27 Ordinance is to enter into a conditional Remittance Agreement, as allowed under Health and
Safety Code Section 34192.4 prior to October 1, 20 II. The Remittance Agreement will provide
for the Commission's reimbursement of City remittance payments required under AB 27 in the
Page 2 of 4
OAK #4820-0383-1562 v2
event that the Court upholds AB 26 and AB 27. Both the City's AB 27 Ordinance and the
proposed Remittance Agreement provide that they are null and void if the Court determines that
AB 26 and AB 27 are determined by a court of compete jurisdiction to be unconstitutional,
illegal, invalid or otherwise unenforceable or inapplicable, for any reason or in any manner. In
addition, the Remittance Agreement clearly states that neither the Commission nor the City is
obligated to transfer any monies under the Remittance Agreement during the pendency of the
stay.
Adoption of the attached conditional Remittance Agreement now should help protect the City
against the possibility that the Supreme Court could uphold AB 26 and 27 but fail to provide
adequate additional time for cities and agencies to act under the legislation. A second reason to
adopt the Remittance Agreement now has to do with provisions in AB 27 (specifically, Health
and Safety Code Section 34194(c)(2)) requiring that for the 2012-13 fiscal year and each year
thereafter, the AB 27 remittances include payment of an amount equivalent to 80 percent of the
total "net school share" of debt service or payments on "new debt." "Net school share" is defined
as the school share of property tax revenues, less any passthrough payments, that would have
been received by the school entities in the absence of redevelopment. "New debt" is defined as
debt that is not included on a redevelopment agency's October 1, 2011, Statement of
Indebtedness (SOl) but shows up on a later SOL Adopting the Remittance Agreement now
allows it to be reported on the October 2011 SOl and, therefore, avoids having that
reimbursement obligation treated as a "new debt" triggering the Section 34194( c )(2) payments to
the schools.
Conclusion
Adopting the Ordinance will allow the continued existence and operation of the Commission and
would allow the Commission to include the payments owed under the Remittance Agreement on
its October 2011 SOL
Adopting the Resolution approving the Remittance Agreement would enable the Commission to
transfer its available funds to the City to make the payments required under AB 27. In addition,
adopting it prior to October I, 2011, would allow the Commission to include the payments owed
under the Remittance Agreement on its October 2011 SOL
Recommendation
I. Staff recommends the City Council Waive Full Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 839.
2. Staff recommends the City Council and Community Development Commission adopt the
attached Resolutions approving the Remittance Agreement.
Exhibits
1. Ordinance No. 839
2. City Council Resolution
3. Community Development Commission Resolution
4. Remittance Agreement
Page 3 of 4
OAK #4820-0383-1562 v2
CITY ATTORNEY/GENERAL COUNSEL'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City
Attorney/General Counsel.
CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION: () Consent Item (X) Regular Time
(X) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
Page 4 of 4
OAK #4820-0383-1562 v2
ORDINANCE NO. 839
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DETERMINING TO COMPLY
WITH THE ALTERNATIVE VOLUNTARY REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
PURSUANT TO PART 1.9 OF DIVISION 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND
SAFETY CODE IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND
OPERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROHNERT PARK
WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission of the City of Robnert Park
("CDC") is a redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community
Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code S 33000 et seq.) ("CRL") and has been authorized
to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the
City Council of the City of Robnert Park ("City Council" or "City," as applicable); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the CRL, the City Council approved and adopted the
Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Robnert Park Redevelopment Project on
July 14, 1987, by Ordinance No. 479, as amended to date (the "Project"), and the CDC is vested
with the responsibility for implementing and carrying out the Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, the CDC is currently in the process of carrying out the goals and objectives
of the Redevelopment Plan by continuing to eliminate blight; increase, improve and preserve the
supply of affordable housing in the community; stimulate and expand economic growth and
employment opportunities by revitalizing properties and businesses within the Project; and
alleviate deficiencies in public infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, in connection with approval and adoption of the State Budget for Fiscal
Year 2011-12, the California Legislature has approved, and the Governor has signed
(i) ABXl 26 (Stats.2011, chap. 5, "ABXl 26"), which immediately, and purportedly
retroactively, suspends all otherwise legal redevelopment activities and incurrence of
indebtedness, and dissolves redevelopment agencies effective October 1, 2011 (the "Dissolution
Act"); and (ii) ABXl 27 (Stats. 2011, chap. 6, "ABX1 27"), which allows communities to avoid
the consequences of the Dissolution Act and continue their redevelopment agency if the
community enacts an ordinance agreeing to comply with the alternative voluntary redevelopment
program described in Section 2 of ABXl 27 adding Part 1.9 (commencing with section 34192)
of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code (the "Alternative Redevelopment Program"); and
WHEREAS, the Alternative Redevelopment Program requires the participating
communities to remit specific annual payments in amounts determined by the State Department
of Finance, subject to the Commission's right to appeal such amounts, to the county auditor-
controller for allocation to school entities and special districts; and
WHEREAS, a Petition for Writ of Mandate was filed in the Supreme Court of the State
of California on July 18, 2011 (California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos,
et al., Case No. 5194861), challenging the constitutionality of ABXl 26 and ABXl 27 on behalf
of cities, counties and redevelopment agencies and requesting a stay of enforcement; and
OAK #4830-9148-8266 v2
1
WHEREAS, on August 11, 2011, the Supreme Court issued a partial stay on the
effectiveness of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 until the Court can rule on the constitutionality of the
two bills, which stay was further modified by the Court on August 17, 2011 (collectively, the
"Stay"); and
WHEREAS, the Stay is unclear as to what actions an agency or city should be taking
during pendency of the Stay; and
WHEREAS, the City has appealed the California Department of Finance's
determination of the Fiscal Year 2011-12 community remittance amount, as provided in
Health and Safety Code Section 34194, and is awaiting the Department's decision on such
appeal; and
WHEREAS, in order to enable the continued operation and unrestricted activities of the
Commission to serve the essential role of implementing the goals and objectives of the
Redevelopment Plan, under the threat of dissolution pursuant to ABX 1 26, and upon the
contingencies and reservations set forth herein, the City shall participate in the Alternative
Redevelopment Program and make the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 community remittance, in the
estimated amount of $4,011,622, or such lesser amount as may be determined based upon
the City's appeal of the Department of Finance's calculations, as well as the subsequent
annual community remittances as set forth in ABXl 27; and
WHEREAS, while the City currently intends to make these community remittances,
the City shall not be obligated to make any community remittance during pendency of the
Stay and, in the event the Stay is lifted, such payments shall be made under protest and
without prejudice to the City's right to recover such amounts and interest thereon, in the
event the Supreme Court makes a final determination that ABXl 26 and ABXl 27 are
unconstitutional; and
WHEREAS, the City reserves the right, regardless of any community remittance
made pursuant to this Ordinance, to challenge the legality of ABXl 26 andABXl 27; and
WHEREAS, the City is the lead agency concerning this Ordinance pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (codified as Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.)
("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, City staff has determined that this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA,
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), because the community remittances
authorized hereunder are a government funding mechanism and fiscal activity, and do not
involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant
environmental impact; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have
occurred.
OAK #4830-9148-8266 v2
2
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park ordains as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and
incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. PARTICIPATION IN THE ALTERNATIVE REDEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM. In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 34193, and based on the
Recitals set forth above, the City Council hereby determines that the City shall comply with the
provisions of Part 1.9 of Division 24 ofthe Health and Safety Code, as enacted by ABXl 27.
SECTION 3. PAYMENT UNDER PROTEST. Subject to the conditions and
reservations set forth in Section 4 below, the City Council hereby determines that the City shall
make the community remittances set forth in Health and Safety Code section 34194 et seq.
SECTION 4. EFFECT OF STAY OR DETERMINATION OF INVALIDITY. City
shall not make any community remittance payments during pendency of the Stay. In the event
the Stay is lifted, such remittance payments shall be made under protest and without
prejudice to the City's right to recover such amounts and interest thereon, in the event the
Supreme Court or another court of competent jurisdiction determines that ABXl 26 and
ABXl 27 are unconstitutional and therefore invalid, and all appeals therefrom are exhausted or
unsuccessful, or time for filing an appeal therefrom has lapsed. If there is a final determination
that ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 are invalid, this Ordinance shall be deemed to be null and void and
of no further force or effect.
SECTION 5. IMPLEMENTATION. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs
the City Manager to take any action and execute any documents necessary to implement this
Ordinance, including but not limited to notifying the Sonoma County Auditor-Controller, the
Controller of the State of California, and the California Department of Finance of the adoption of
this Ordinance and the City's agreement to comply with the provisions of Part 1.9 of Division 24
of the Health and Safety Code, as set forth in ABX1 27.
SECTION 6. ADDITIONAL UNDERSTANDINGS AND INTENT. The City
Council does not intend, by enactment of this Ordinance, to pledge any of its general fund
revenues or assets to make the remittance payments. Rather, coricurrently with adoption of this
Ordinance, City will enter into a remittance agreement with the Commission as authorized by
Section 34194.2, pursuant to which the Commission will transfer annual portions of its tax
increment to the City in amounts not to exceed the annual community remittance payments to
enable the City, directly or indirectly, to make the annual remittance payments in the event the
Stay is lifted and ABXl 26 and ABXl 27 are upheld. As with this Ordinance, the remittance
agreement between City and Commission will be deemed null and void and of no further force or
effect if there is a final determination that ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 are invalid.
SECTION 7. CEQA. The City Council finds, under Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4), that this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in that it is not a "project," but instead consists
of the creation and continuation of a governmental funding mechanism for potential future
projects and programs, and does not commit funds to any specific project or program that may
result in a potentially significant environmental impact.
OAK #4830-9148-8266 v2
3
SECTION 8. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION. The City Council hereby authorizes and
directs that a Notice of Exemption be filed with the County Clerk of the County of Sonoma,
California, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 9. CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS. The documents and materials that
constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City
Clerk's office located at City Hall, 130 Avram Avenue, Robnert Park, California 94928. The
custodian for these records is Terri Griffin, City Clerk.
SECTION 10. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application
thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other
provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid
provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City
Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity
of any particular portion thereof.
SECTION 11. EFFECTIVE DATE AND PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall be
in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption and shall be published and posted as
required by law.
This Ordinance was introduced by the City Council of the City of Robnert Park on
September 13,2011 and adopted on ,2011, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Gina Belforte, Mayor
ATTEST:
Terri Griffin, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney
OAK #4830-9148-8266 v2
4
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT
P ARK APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
REMITT ANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROHNERT PARK PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
SECTION 34194.2
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and
Safety Code Sections 33000, et seq.) ("CRL"), the City Council ("City Council") of the City of
Robnert Park ("City") created the Community Development Commission of the City of Robnert
Park ("CDC") to serve as the redevelopment agency within the City; and
WHEREAS, the CDC is responsible for carrying out the Redevelopment Plan for the
Robnert Park Redevelopment Project ("Redevelopment Plan") covering certain areas within the
City ("Project Area"); and
WHEREAS, as part of the 2011-12 State budget bill, the California Legislature enacted,
and the Governor signed: (i) ABXl 26, which prohibits agencies from taking numerous actions,
effective immediately, and purportedly retroactively, and provides that agencies are deemed to be
dissolved as of October I, 2011; and (ii) ABXl 27, which provides that agencies do not have to
cease activities and do not have to dissolve, if the community creating the redevelopment agency
enacts an ordinance agreeing to comply with the alternative voluntary redevelopment program
described in Section 2 of ABXl 27 adding Part 1.9 (commencing with section 34192) of
Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code ("Alternative Redevelopment Program"); and
WHEREAS, the Alternative Redevelopment Program requires the City to remit specific
annual payments to the Sonoma County Auditor-Controller ("City Remittance"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34194.2 of the CRL, the City may enter into an
agreement with the CDC, whereby the CDC will transfer a portion of its tax increment to the
City in a particular fiscal year, in an amount not to exceed the amount of the City Remittance for
such fiscal year, for the purpose of financing activities within the Project Area related to the
CDC's goals; and
WHEREAS, a Petition for Writ of Mandate was filed in the Supreme Court of the State
of California on July 18, 2011 (California Redevelopment Association, et al. v; Ana Matosantos,
et al., Case No. 5194861), challenging the constitutionality of ABXl 26 and ABXl 27 on behalf
of cities, counties and redevelopment agencies and requesting a stay of enforcement; and
WHEREAS, on August 11, 2011, the Supreme Court issued a partial stay on the
effectiveness of ABXl 26 and ABXl 27 until the Court can rule on the constitutionality of the
two bills, which stay was further modified by the Court on August 17, 20 11 (collectively, the
"Stay"); and
OAK #4829-8352-1546 v2
WHEREAS, the Stay is unclear as to what actions an agency or city should be taking
during pendency of the Stay and, therefore, notwithstanding the pending litigation and the Stay,
City adopted Ordinance No. 839 agreeing to comply with the Alternative Redevelopment
Progranl, subject to certain terms and conditions, and City and CDC wish to enter into a
remittance agreement pursuant to Section 34194.2 of the CRL in order to enable the City to
make the annual City Remittance payments required by ABXl 27 and enable the CDC to
continue its activities necessary to carry out the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan,
in the event ABXl 26 and ABXl 27 are upheld and the Stay is lifted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby approves the
Remittance Agreement, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Agreement"),
and authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City,
subject to such technical or clarifying revisions as are reasonably determined necessary by the
City Manager and approved by the City Attorney.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed
to take all actions and execute all documents as necessary or appropriate to carry out the
Agreement on behalf of the City.
DULY AND REGULAR ADOPTED this 2ih day of September, 2011.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Gina Belforte, Mayor
ATTEST:
Terri Griffin, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney
OAK #4829-8352-1546 v2
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A REMITTANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK PURSUANT TO
HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34194.2
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and
Safety Code Sections 33000, et seq.) ("CRL"), the City Council ("City Council") of the City of
Robnert Park ("City") created the Community Development Commission of the City of Robnert
Park ("CDC") to serve as the redevelopment agency within the City; and
WHEREAS, the CDC is responsible for carrying out the Redevelopment Plan for the
Robnert Park Redevelopment Project ("Redevelopment Plan") covering certain areas within the
City ("Project Area"); and
WHEREAS, as part of the 2011-12 State budget bill, the California Legislature enacted,
and the Governor signed: (i) ABXl 26, which prohibits agencies from taking numerous actions,
effective immediately, and purportedly retroactively, and provides that agencies are deemed to be
dissolved as of October I, 2011; and (ii) ABXl 27, which provides that agencies do not have to
cease activities and do not have to dissolve, if the community creating the redevelopment agency
enacts an ordinance agreeing to comply with the alternative voluntary redevelopment program
described in Section 2 of ABX1 27 adding Part 1.9 (commencing with section 34192) of
Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code ("Alternative Redevelopment Program"); and
WHEREAS, the Alternative Redevelopment Program requires the City to remit specific
annual payments to the Sonoma County Auditor-Controller ("City Remittance"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34194.2 of the CRL, the City may enter into an
agreement with the CDC, whereby the CDC will transfer a portion of its tax increment to the
City in a particular fiscal year, in an amount not to exceed the amount of the City Remittance for
such fiscal year, for the purpose of financing activities within the Project Area related to the
CDC's goals; and
WHEREAS, a Petition for Writ of Mandate was filed in the Supreme Court of the State
of California on July 18, 2011 (California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos,
et ai., CaseNo. 5194861), challenging the constitutionality of ABXl 26 and ABXl 27 on behalf
of cities, counties and redevelopment agencies and requesting a stay of enforcement; and
WHEREAS, on August 11, 2011, the Supreme Court issued a partial stay on the
effectiveness of ABXl 26 and ABXl 27 until the Court can rule on the constitutionality of the
two bills, which stay was further modified by the Court on August 17, 2011 (collectively, the
"Stay"); and
OAK #4820-4366-9770 v2
WHEREAS, the Stay is unclear as to what actions an agency or city should be taking
during pendency of the Stay and, therefore, notwithstanding the pending litigation and the Stay,
City adopted Ordinance No. 839 agreeing to comply with the Alternative Redevelopment
Program, subject to certain terms and conditions, and City and CDC wish to enter into a
remittance agreement pursuant to Section 34194.2 of the CRL in order to enable the City to
make the annual City Remittance payments required by ABXl 27 and enable the CDC to
continue its activities necessary to carry out the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan,
in the event ABXl 26 and ABXl 27 are upheld and the Stay is lifted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the CDC hereby approves the
Remittance Agreement, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Agreement"),
and authorizes and directs the Executive Director of the CDC to execute the Agreement on
behalf of the CDC, subject to such technical or clarifying revisions as are reasonably determined
necessary by the Executive Director and approved by CDC Counsel.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the CDC Executive Director is hereby authorized
and directed to take all actions and execute all documents as necessary or appropriate to carry out
the Agreement on behalf of the CDC.
DULY AND REGULAR ADOPTED this 27th day of September, 2011.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Gina Belforte, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Terri Griffin, Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michelle Kenyon, General Counsel
OAK #4820-4366-9770 v2
REMITTANCE AGREEMENT
PURSUANT TO
CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34194.2
THIS REMITTANCE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into this
day of ,2011, by and between the CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, a general law
city and municipal corporation (the "City") and the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, a public body, corporate and politic (the
"CDC"), with reference to the following facts:
A. The CDC is a redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California
Community Redevelopment Law (health and Safety Code Section 33000, et seq.) and is
responsible for implementing the Redevelopment Plan for the Robnert Park Redevelopment
Project ("Redevelopment Plan") covering certain areas within the City ("Project Area").
B. Assembly Bill No. xl 26 ("AB 26") and Assembly Bill No. xl 27 ("AB 27") were
passed by the State Legislature on June 15,2011 and signed by the Governor on June 29, 2011.
C. AB 26 requires that each redevelopment agency be dissolved unless, pursuant to
AB 27 (to be codified as Part 1.9 of the California Health and Safety Code, commencing with
Section 34192), the community that created it enacts an ordinance committing it to participate in
what is commonly known as the voluntary alternative redevelopment program and to make
certain statutorily-specified payments described in Health and Safety Code Section 34194 to the
County Auditor-Controller ("Alternative Redevelopment Program" or "Program").
D. The City Council of the City of Robnert Park the "City Council") has adopted
Ordinance No. 839 to comply with AB 27 and participate in the Alternative Redevelopment
Program (the "Ordinance"). .
E. An action challenging the constitutionality of AB 26 and AB 27 has been filed
on behalf of cities, counties and redevelopment agencies and is being litigated by the League
of California Cities and California Redevelopment Association, and the Supreme Court of
the State of California has stayed, in part, the effect of AB 26 and AB 27.
F. Pursuant to the Ordinance, the City has committed to . make the remittances
required by the Alternative Redevelopment Program, to otherwise comply with the Program's
requirements and, in doing so, to authorize the continuation of the CDC after enactment of AB
26 and AB 27.
G. The City has committed to make the remittances under protest and without
prejudice to the City's right to recover such amounts and interest thereon in the event there is a
final determination by the Supreme Court that AB 26 and AB.27 are invalid.
H. Notwithstanding the Supreme Court's order staying the effectiveness of AB
26 and AB 27, the City and CDC desire to prepare for the Supreme Court's ultimate
determination on the merits of the litigation and to be prepared for continued operation of
the CDC if AB 26 and AB 27 are found to be a valid exercise of the State Legislature's
power.
1
OAK #4815-2305-1786 v2
I. Execution of this Agreement will allow the City and CDC to continue
redevelopment activities immediately upon the Supreme Court's determination on the merits
of the litigation, or upon its lifting of the stay as to AB 26 and AB 27, should either take
place.
J. In the event the Supreme Court issues a final determination that AB 26 and AB
27 are invalid, this Agreement shall be null and void and of no further force or effect, as the City
has already determined that the Ordinance shall be deemed to be null and void and of no further
force or effect in such event.
K. Unless and until AB 26 and AB 27 are invalidated, the City, pursuant to Health
and Safety Code Section 3.4194.1, may use any available funds not otherwise obligated for other
uses in making remittances to the Sonoma County Auditor-Controller pursuant to Health and
Safety Code Section 34194 or 34194.5.
L. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34194.2, the City may enter into an
agreement with the CDC, whereby the CDC will transfer a portion of the taxes allocated to it
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670 ("Tax Increment") to the City, in an amount
not to exceed the annual remittance required that year pursuant to Chapter 3 of Part 1.9, for the
purpose of financing activities within the redevelopment area that are related to accomplishing
CDC project goals ("City Remittances").
M. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the foregoing transfer of Tax
Increment funds, should the Supreme Court uphold the validity of AB 26 and AB 27, in this
current fiscal year and forthcoming fiscal years, in amounts sufficient to pay the annual City
Remittances required by the Alternative Redevelopment Program and to allow the City to
undertake projects, programs and activities related to the CDC's project goals, including the
administrative costs of undertaking those projects, programs, and activities.
N. The obligations of the CDC under this Agreement shall constitute an indebtedness
of the CDC for the purpose of carrying out the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area.
O. As further stated in the Ordinance, the City reserves the right, whether any City
Remittance has been paid, to challenge the legality of AB 26 and AB 27.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
I. INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS
The recitals above are an integral part of this Agreement and set forth the intentions of
the parties and the premises on which the parties have decided to enter into this Agreement.
II. OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES
I. The CDC shall transfer to the City in a timely manner Tax Increment or any other
available funds in an amount sufficient for the City to make the City Remittances required by the
Alternative Redevelopment Program. The amount to be transferred to the City shall equal the
entire amount determined by the State Director of Finance to be the City's obligation under the
2
OAK #4815-2305-1786 v2
Program, subject to the City's right to appeal the amount of remittance to the Director pursuant
to the Program. The City and CDC agree that if CDC does not have sufficient Tax Increment or
other funds available to make the full City Remittance required in any fiscal year, City shall have
no obligation to use City funds for such purpose; in which case the CDC may be deemed to be
dissolved under Health and Safety Code Section 34195. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CDC
shall have no obligation to transfer any monies under this subsection I for the duration of the
Supreme Court's stay.
2. Subject to the timely receipt from the CDC of Tax Increment or other funds
sufficient to make the annual City Remittances required by the Program, the City shall pay to the
Sonoma County Auditor-Controller, no later than January 15 and May 15 of each year, one-half
of the City Remittance amount due for each fiscal year while this Agreement is in effect. The
City's obligation to make such City Remittance payments shall be a special limited fund
obligation of the City payable solely from Tax Increment or other available funds paid to the
City by the CDC pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be
deemed to be a pledge of the City's general fund revenues or any other assets to pay the City
Remittances for any fiscal year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City shall have no obligation to
transfer any monies under this subsection 2 for the duration of the Supreme Court's stay.
III. TERMINATION
This Agreement shall be deemed null and void if AB 26 and AB 27 are determined by a
court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, illegal, invalid or otherwise unenforceable
or inapplicable, for any reason or in any manner. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other
provision of this Agreement, either the City or the CDC may terminate this Agreerrient at any
time, for any reason or no reason, by written notice to the other party.
IV. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
In contemplation of the provisions of California Government Code Section 895.2
imposing certain tort liability jointly upon public entities solely by reason of such entities being
parties to an agreement as defined by Government Code Section 895, the parties hereto, as
between themselves, pursuant to the authorization contained in Government Code Sections 895.4
and 895.6, shall each assume the full liability imposed upon it, or any of its officers, agents or
employees, by law for injury caused by negligent or wrongful acts or omissions occurring in the
performance of this Agreement to the same extent that such liability would be imposed in the
absence of Government Code Section 895.2. To achieve the above-stated purpose, each party
indemnifies, defends and holds harmless the other party for any liability, losses, cost or expenses
that may be incurred by such other party solely by reason of Government Code Section 895.2.
V. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; WAIVERS; AND AMENDMENTS
I. This Agreement shall be executed in duplicate originals, each of which is deemed
to be an original. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the
parties, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect
to the subject matter ofthis Agreement.
3
OAK #4815-2305-1786 v2
2. This Agreement is intended solely for the benefit of the City and the CDC.
Notwithstanding any reference in this Agreement to persons or entities other than the City and
the CDC, there shall be no third party beneficiaries under this Agreement.
3. Any waiver or amendment of the provisions of this Agreement must be in writing
and signed by the authorized representatives of the parties.
4. As to the performance of any obligation under this Agreement of which time is a
component, the performance of such obligation within the time specified is of the essence.
VI. SEVERABILITY
If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall
continue in full force and effect unless the rights and obligations of the parties have been
materially altered or abridged by such invalidation, voiding or unenforceability.
VI. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS
This Agreement shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of all successors and
assigns of the parties, whether by agreement or operation of law. This Agreement shall survive
any full or partial merger of the City and the CDC and shall remain in effect and be fully
enforceable according to its terms.
4
OAK #4815-2305-1786 v2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first
set forth above.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
By:
Gabriel Gonzalez, City Manager
Attest:
Terri Griffin, City Clerk
Approved As To Form:
By:
Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney
OAK #4815-2305-1786 v2
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROHNERTPARK
By:
Gabriel Gonzalez, Executive Director
Attest:
Terri Griffin, Secretary
Approved As To Form:
By:
Michelle Kenyon, General Counsel
5
Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings {This sectionfor City Clerk Use Only}
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
· Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no
later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date . 9/27/11 City Council Agenda
· Agenda items to City Manager via email for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to
the City Clerk for drafting agendas ITEM NO.9
· Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets
with 2 sets single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
· Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Thursday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park Municioal Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No; 2008-173
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
September 27,201 I
Department:
Public Works & Community Services
Submitted By:
John McAl1hur, Director of Public Works & Community Services
Submittal Date:
September 2 1,20 II
Agenda Title:
High Efficiency Street Lighting Alternatives
Requested Council Action: Discussion and Direction to Staff in Developing aHigh Efficiency Street
Lighting Standard
RECOMMENDATION
Staff has completed a thorough analysis of high efficiency street lighting alternatives and
recommends that the City Council direct staff to develop a Light-Emitting Diode (LED) street
lighting standard for adoption by the City Council at a later date.
Over the past few months, staff has studied various high efficiency street lighting alternatives.
Our hope is to develop an energy efficient street lighting standard that will be used for new
developments within the City of Rohnert Park and also for replacement of existing street lights.
The three alternatives were compared and analyzed based on life-cycle cost, performance, and
current market trends. The timing of this study was necessitated by two factors:
I. Street Light Maintenance Sustainability and Costs - street light maintenance was
recently shifted to Public Works staff. We are seeking ways to extend maintenance
intervals thereby improving service levels, reducing workload/impact to staff, and
lowering supplies and labor costs.
2. There is approximately $25,000 in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(ARRA) grant funding remaining for energy efficient street lighting projects -
before pursuing a modest street lighting pilot project, a standard should be in place
so that the pilot project is consistent with future lighting projects.
PILOT PROJECT BACKGROUND
In September 2009, the City was awarded $164,100 in ARRA grant funding through the
DepaI1ment of Energy's (DOE) Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program
(EECBG). The purpose of the EECBG program is to assist eligible agencies in creating and
implementing strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to reduce total energy usage, and
to improve energy efficiency through other "shovel ready" projects such as street lighting
converSIOns.
$85,000 in grant funding was allocated towards lighting conversions. The City has completed
two of the three planned lighting conversion projects as follows:
I. $55,000 - LED lights at various City parks (completed)
2. $5,000 - LED lights at the Community Center Complex (completed)
3. $25,000 - LED street light pilot project (remaining grant funding balance)
Upon City Council's direction to develop and implement the new LED street lighting standard,
the remaining $25,000 in EECBG funds would be used to fund the a modest LED street light
conversion pilot project.
STREETLIGHT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
Objectives
The new street lighting standard should: I) have the lowest costs - including capital, operating
and maintenance, 2) achieve the highest performance - color, range, and output, and 3) reduce
energy consumption - a grant requirement and climate action plan goal.
Alternative Overview
Existing Technology - High Pressure Sodium (HPS) - Rohnert Park currently has approximately
2,700 existing High Pressure Sodium (HPS) lights throughout the City with roughly 2, 1 00 of
those lights being located in residential areas and 350 situated on main roads such as Commerce
Boulevard and Rohnert Park Expressway. Typically, the residential HPS lights consist of lower
watt fixtures (70 watts) with the higher watt fixtures (I50 watts) placed on the main roads.
Although HPS lights are the most common type of street lighting, the technology is old with
comparatively high operation and maintenance costs. HPS lighting also tends to be less uniform
with hotspots under the fixtures and also consumes considerably more energy than either LED or
induction lighting. In light of these findings, staff is not considering HPS lighting for further
analysis and will focus the following discussion to two alternatives: LED and induction lighting.
1. Light-Emitting Diode (LED) - In contrast to the existing HPS lighting infrastructure, LED
uses an array of light-emitting diodes (light distribution points) which provide the ability
to direct, expand or narrow light distribution according to need. LED's produce a cool,
white light with a high color rendering index that maximizes brightness and visibility.
This type of lighting is also considered the most environmentally-friendly alternative as it
contains no mercury in its fixtures. LED's also offer greater savings potential with its
dimming technology that could provide variable lighting output capacity if installed
during the conversion process.
2. Induction - Induction lighting differs from LED's in that it converts electrical power into
visible radiation - similar to fluorescent lamps. This type of lighting is not considered
new technology nor is it widely used by municipalities in streetlight applications, but it
does represent similar electrical costs and life-expectancy as LED's. The light output for
induction lighting is typically a softer white than LED's; provides for a wider range of
colors, but has a narrower light distribution capacity. Induction lighting fixtures contain
mercury which will pose future disposal problems (and costs). In comparison to LED's,
induction lighting fixtures cost less initially to purchase but do not have the dimming
technology so consequently have less capacity to reduce energy consumption and energy
costs during their life-cycle.
Evaluation Criteria
Several factors were considered in evaluating both lighting alternatives. In addition to cost, staff
considered lighting technology performance, as well as market trends and financial incentives.
The following criteria will be discussed and weighed through each alternative:
I. Capital Cost - The initial capital outlay related to converting existing HPS fixtures.
2. 20-Year Life Cycle Costs - This includes power consumption, and anticipated
replacement costs. Replacement cost is the cost of bulbs and labor needed to change a
bulb at some future point in time. Key factors affecting replacement cost is bulb life-
expectancy - the longer the anticipated bulb life, the greater the replacement interval
becomes which translates into lower life-cycle costs.
3. Performance - Color, and light distribution are key considerations with each technology.
With greater light distribution, the fewer number of fixtures could be used to achieve the
same lighting affect; thus, better performance can lead to lower costs.
4. Market Trends - Staff considered what technology other jurisdictions are converting to.
Conceivably, the more one technology is embraced, the greater the possibility of bulk
purchasing increases thereby lowering the initial capital outlay.
5. Incentives - Rebates and grant opportunities were also considered in evaluating total cost.
Financial incentives can significantly reduce capital outlay and future costs. Also, PG&E
offers a discounted power rate on both LED and induction lighting fixtures. Since the
lower electrical usage rate is comparable for both lighting technologies, it was considered
in this analysis.
Other factors, including dimming capability and future disposal costs were also considered in
this analysis.
ANAL YSIS
Capital Cost
Capital cost includes the initial outlay for the new fixtures. LED fixtures are approximately 10%
lower than an equivalent induction fixture (summarized in Table 2). Additionally, PG&E is
currently offering a $50 rebate per fixture for LED streetlight retrofit projects. It is not clear at
this time whether this rebate will be offered in the future; however, it is available now and could
be used with the street light retrofit pilot project.
20- Year Life Cycle Costs
Staff conducted a 20-year life-cycle cost analysis of both lighting alternatives. This analysis
considered both total energy and replacement costs:
1 ~ Energy costs were figured based on current PG&E rates with the assumption that
throughout the year, street lights are on a little over 11 hours per day or about
4,100 hours per year.
2. Replacement (or Maintenance) costs were based on the number of lamp
replacements for each fixture type over a 20-year period. Replacement costs
include labor and the price of bulbs in present dollars.
The table below represents the anticipated frequency that bulbs are replaced within a useful or
serviceable life-cycle period. Both induction and LED lighting gradually decay in light output
over time; whereas, traditional HPS bulbs will fail (or go out completely) at the end of their life
cycle - much like an incandescent bulb. This table demonstrates how many years it will take for
an induction or LED bulb to decay to 70% light output.
Table 1: Bulb Replacement Frequency
Equivalent Life Frequency
Alternatives Duration Expectancy* (#/20-yr Cycle)
Alt 1 - Induction 94,000 hrs 20 yrs 0
Alt 2 - LED 150,000 hrs 37 yrs 0
Existing - HPS 24,000 hrs 6 yrs 3
* light fixture is at least 70% light output at end of life expectancy
The 20-year cost analysis is outlined in Table 2 below. This table shows annual power and
replacement cost ($/year) for both technologies as well as anticipated costs over a 20-year
period. ExistingHPS lighting is also shown for comparison purposes. Please note that LED
lighting reaches 70% output after 37 years. For comparison purposes, total LED costs were
amortized over a 20-year period.
Table 2: 20-Year Life Cycle Cost per 70 Watt-Equivalent Fixture
Total Total
Annual 20- Year Life
Cost Cycle
Power Power Annual Bulb Power and Power and
Capital Usage Cost Replacement Replacement Replacement
Alternatives $/fixture (watts) ($/yr) ($/yr) ($/yr) ($/fixture/20year)
AIt 1 - Induction 452 40 20 11 33 660
AIt2-LED
412*
37
19
9.5
29
580
Existing - HPS
372
70
42
30
72
1,440
* Capital cost does not include $50 rebate for LED retrofit projects
Other costs not figured into this analysis include bulb disposal costs upon replacement. LED
bulbs can be disposed of with normal household waste at only a marginal cost. Induction light
bulbs contain mercury and will have to be disposed of in compliance with applicable hazardous
waste handling procedures. These costs are presently unknown but can be significant and
therefore should be considered.
The following table (Table 3) demonstrates the time in years when the City would reach a
positive Net Present Value (NPV), or begin to realize a savings from a significant capital project.
The scenario considered for analysis was replacement of the City's approximately 2l00, 70-watt
fixtures with either LED or induction lighting. Table 3 illustrates that LED lighting provides the
City with the quickest return on a large-scale capital investment.
Table 3: Projected Rate of Return - Major Capital Project
Total Power Total
Conversion Savings Replacement Savings
Alternatives Cost (per year) (per year) (per year) Payback
AIt 1 - Induction 950,000 46,200 39,900 86,000 ] ] years
AIt 2 - LED 760,000 48,300 43,000 9],000 8.3 years
Performance
Current LED lighting technology provides superior lighting performance compared to induction
lighting. Both lighting technologies offer superior color distribution to conventional HPS
lighting and have been described as resembling natural sunlight; however, LED lighting offers
the following distinct advantages:
l. Light Distribution - LED lighting has broader and more evenly distributed light.
In some cases, fewer light fixtures could be used to realize an equivalent lighting
effect.
2. Dimming Capability - Only LED lighting is capable of using dimming
technology; the ability to lower light output (similar to a residential fixture). This
could be useful as a cost savings practice to lower energy consumption.
3. Duration - LED's last longer than induction lighting. Currently, LED's last over
40% longer; however, based on rapidly improving LED technology, we believe
this will only continue to improve.
Market Trends
Market trends indicate that more agencies and local governments are moving towards converting
existing street light infrastructure to LED technology as opposed to induction. The primary
reason for this trend revolves around the fact that induction lighting represents "matured
technology" (1 0+ years old) and has no known new improvement potential. On the other hand,
LED lighting is continually evolving and is rapidly becoming less expensive, longer lasting and
more energy efficient.
Locally, County of Marin and the cities of Pet alum a and Novato have adopted a LED street light
standard. In addition, some of California's largest cities, including Los Angeles, San Jose, and
San Francisco, have also adopted an LED standard. Staff anticipates more agencies to follow
suit as LED street lighting technology continues to improve. The cost analysis discussed above
represents present value (today's costs) and attempts to forecast future price reductions and
performance enhancements. However, we are confident that in light of the ongoing technology
improvements and enhanced purchasing power gained as more agencies adopt this standard, the
City's return on a large scale capital project will be realized even sooner than discussed above.
Financial Incentives
The current available incentives favor LED technology. Incentives range from financing
programs, consolidated project management, purchasing rebates, and electrical usage rate
reductions. Specifically, PG&E is offering multiple programs and incentives geared toward LED
lighting that include:
1. $50 per fixture rebate for an LED lighting fixture - This amounts to a l2% price
reduction for a 70-watt equivalent LED lighting fixture;
2. Bulk purchasing power and project management - PG&E has launched a 'Turn
Key' program that enables agencies to make bulk purchases through PG&E: this
program significantly lowers the unit cost of each LED fixture. Another optional
component of this program is a total project management concept where PG&E
purchases and installs the fixtures; and
3. Low-interest financing programs - Both the State and PG&E offer low-interest
financing programs for LED street light conversion projects.
RECOMMENDA TION
LED lighting is less expensive upon initial capital purchase, offers lower 20-year operating costs,
and also provides superior lighting performance. Additionally, based on current market trends,
technology improvements, and incentives, we believe the gap between LED and other
technologies will continue to widen in favor of LED's. Table 4 briefly summarizes the direct
comparison between LED and induction lighting technologies; LED street lighting technology is
superior in all measured categories.
Table 4: Alternative Evaluation Summary Matrix
AI
C . I
20- Year Life
C I C P ~
T d
I
ternatJves aplta ~yc e ost er ormance ren s ncentlves
AU 1 - Induction
Alt 2 - LED X X X X X
Staff recommends that the City Council directs staff to develop a LED street light standard for
adoption by the City Council at a later date.
Financial Impacts
Should the City Council direct staff to develop a LED Street Light Standard, staff would proceed
with a grant-funded pilot LED Street Light Conversion Project. The benefits of this pilot project
include:
1. Saves the General Fund money;
2. Progress towards the City's Greenhouse Gas Action Plan;
3. Maximizes volume purchase power and eligibility for further rebates - through
PG&E, the City would achieve economy of scale with the initial purchase,
thereby stretching the City's grant allocation as far as possible. This partnership
would also provide the mechanism for obtaining future rebates; and
4. Provides a means for the evaluation and planning of Citywide LED street light
conversion - an incremental approach by converting only a small amount of
fixtures at this time will allow the City time to evaluate the new LED technology
before proceeding to a more comprehensive citywide project.
Future large-scale LED conversion projects would provide a significant savings to the City's
General Fund. LED street lights would reduce street light energy costs by 50-60%, and reduce
labor expenses through a 500% (or 30-year) increase in streetlight replacement intervals.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent ltem
( ) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
(X) Regular Time
Per Interim City Manager's review and direction for distribution of this agenda item.
(Revised 03 ]309) JH:TG-S05-b
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
, Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances &
Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE
no later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
, Agenda Items w/attachments via email and hard copy to City Clerk DUE no later than
NOON Two (2) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
, Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later
than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
, Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed/mailed on
Wednesday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with
Rohnert Park Municioal Code Section 2.08.050
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 10
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-93
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
September 27,2011
Department:
Department of Public Safety
Submitted By:
Brian Masterson, Director of Public Safety
Submittal Date:
September 5, 2011
Agenda Title:
2011-12 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Expenditure Plan
Requested Council Action:
Hold a public hearing and adopt Resolution Approving the 2011-12 Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Expenditure Plan
Summary: The State of California provides supplemental funding to local law enforcement agencies under the Citizens
Option for Public Safety (COPS) through a program that establishes in each county treasury a Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) that receives an annual allocation of Sate funds (California Government Code
30061). The County Auditor allocates monies from this fund each year and is allocated based on population. The Funds
must be used for front line municipal police services for the purpose of anti-gang activity, juvenile justice and community
crime prevention programs.
The City Council is required to hold a public hearing each year to consider the request of the Police Chief for the use of
these funds. The Council must consider the request for spending separate and apart from the allocations from the general
fund (annual budget). Approval of the funding request to receive SLESF monies must be determined by a Council
majority vote.
The City of Rohnert Park anticipates receiving $100,000 for fiscal year 2011-12. This funding allocation is included in the
City's 2011-12 budget and will be used by the Police Department to provide frontline law enforcement services as partial
funding for a sworn officer, specifically an anti-gang enforcement officer, as shown below in the table:
2009/10 2010/11 2010/11 2011/12
Actual Budget Actual Request
Sworn Office Salary $ 81,682 $ 90,000 $ 101,515 95,000
Benefits 59,521 56,700 63,801 59,850
Uniform allowance 240 240 240 240
Equipment
141,443 146,940 165,556 155,090
SLESF Grant Funding (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)
Department Total 41 ,443 46,940 65,556 55,090
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council, by resolution, approve the 2011-12 SLESF expenditure plan
for the continuation the supplemental funding of anti-gang enforcement officer salary and benefits as well as any services,
supplies and equipment for the position.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:( ) Consent Item
(X) Approval (X) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
( ) Regular Time
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-93
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
APPROVING THE 2011-12 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
SERVICES FUND EXPENDITURE PLAN
WHEREAS, The State of California enacted the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS)
program, under Assembly Bill (AB) 3229 to fund front line law enforcement services:
WHEREAS, a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) has been established
in Sonoma. County to receive amounts allocated from the COPS program;
WHEREAS, estimated funds available under this program is approximately $100,000 to the
City of Robnert Park;
WHEREAS, the Council conducted a public hearing to consider recommendations for use of
these funds as required by law;
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 30061 requires the Council of the City of Robnert
Park to annually approve an expenditure plan for these;
WHEREAS, the 2011/2012 budget was approved or will be approved in anticipation of
using the SLESF funds as a part of the Police Department's budget;
WHEREAS, the Department of Public Safety of the City of Robnert Park plans to use the
funding to continue the supplemental funding of a sworn officer's position;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Robnert
Park does hereby request and authorize the acceptance of SLESF grant funds and approve the 2011-
12 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund expenditure plan allocation for funding a sworn
officer position for front line law enforcement services.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 2ih day of September 2011.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST
City Clerk
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park will be holding
a PUBLIC HEARING.
WHERE: Rohnert Park City Hall- Council Chamber
130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, California
WHEN: Tuesday, September 27,2011, at the hour of 6:00 p.m.
or as soon thereafter as the matter is reached on the agenda.
PURPOSE: To solicit input regarding the Fiscal Year 201l-12 Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Expenditure Plan
Representatives of this proposal will be available to respond to questions.
All persons interested in this matter should appear at the September 27,2011, City Council
meeting. Written statements may be submitted to the City Clerk in advance for presentation to
the Council as part of the public hearing.
NOTE: If you challenge this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you
or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Rohnert Park at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Documents related to this item are available for public review during normal business hours at
the City Clerk's Office, 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, CA, (707) 588-2225.
Questions regarding this matter should be directed to Cathy Orme, Accounting Manager, (707)
585-67l7
Dated: September 14, 20 II
Published: September 16,2011
Terri Griffin, City Clerk
r-
{This section for City Clerk Use Only}
Agenda Packet Preparation TlMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings
held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month:
. Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances & Agreements to
Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no later than NOON Three
(3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda items to City Manager via em ail for his review and responding ..email authorization",
synchronized with above timeframe of Assistant City Attorney review, and an email copy to the City
Clerk for drafting agendas
. Agenda Items with attachments via email and a total of twenty (20) complete hard copy sets with 2 sets
single-sided & 18 sets double-sided/stapled to City Clerk DUE no later than NOON Two (2) Fridays
prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later than
Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date
. Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas postedldistributedlmailed on Thursday
afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with Rohnert Park Municipal
Code Section 2.08.020 and related Resolution No. 2008-173
09/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 11
CITY OF RQHNERT PARK
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT
Meeting Date:
Department:
September 27, 2011
Administration
Submitted By:
Submittal Date:
Terri Griffin, City Clerk
September 20,2011
Agenda Title:
Cultural Arts Commission Appointment
Requested Council Action: Consider nomination for and appointment to vacancy on the Cultural
Arts Commission
BACKGROUND
The Cultural Arts Commission has been established to encourage and develop programs among
community groups for the cultural enrichment of Rohnert Park. As stated in Rohnert Park Municipal
Code section 2.24.030, preferences in the selection of Cultural Arts Commission members are given
where possible to persons of acknowledged accomplishment in the professional practice of the arts. or to
persons who have demonstrated a deep interest in and appreciation of cultural and artistic activities.
. Each member of the City Council is allowed to nominate one individual for appointment to the Cultural
Arts Commission. Each person nominated must receive a majority vote of the City Council to be
appointed. Currently, two vacancies exist on the Commission:
12/31/2010
2/22/2011
Expired term (Michael Randolph)
Resignation (Ronald Breeze)
No.ITlination by
Council Member Ahanotu
Council Member Callinan
The City Clerk's Office has distributed and posted notices ofthese vacancies since January 2011 and
February 2011, respectively.
On September 12,2011, the City Clerk's Office received the attached Fact Sheet Application from
Andrew Dylan Wright seeking appointment to the Cultural Arts Commission. Mr. Wright submitted his
application for nomination by Council Member Callinan; however, Mr. Wright indicated he would be
willing to be considered for either vacancy.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Council consider the nomination and appointment of Andrew Dylan Wright to the
Cultural Arts Commission for the remainder of a two-year term to expire December 31, 2012.
Attachment:
1. Fact Sheet Application from Andrew Dylan Wright
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item
( ) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required
( ) Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment
( ) Policy Determination by Council
( ) City Comments:
(X) Regular Time
"II I '-'I 1'''''".......'' . 1"""\,"" - IvV 1""'\ V I CUll ,",VCIIU~ - I'VI"I~I" ro.n, "'''' - ~""i7"U
PHONE: (707) 588-2227 FAX: (707) 792-1876 EMAIL: tgriffin@rpcitv.orq
FACT SHEET FOR CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO COMMISSIONS, BOA~OMMITTEES
. . ERr PARK
Towhich Commission, Board, or Committee do you seek Appointment?
Cultural Arts Commission
SEP 1 2 2011
eln' CLERK
Name: Andrew Dylan Wright
Residence Telephone: (707) 480-6098
Address: 443 Anson Avenue, Rohnert Park CA 94928
Work phone: (707) 665-9500 Fax: (707) 792-4461
E-mail: andrew.wright@oce.com
Cell: (707) 480-6098
Indicate Reasons for your Interest in Appointment:
After living in Rohnert Park for 24 years, I have benefited from others volunteering to help make this city the great
community that it is. As my personal abilities have grown, I now feel that I have an opportunity to volunteer my
own time to give back to our town. Since the arts are one of my hobbies, I feel that havingan active roll in the
Cultural Arts Commission would be a great start.
List Activities in Clubs, Associations, etc.
Boy Scouts of America
Are you 18 or over? Yes: ~ No: _
Are you registered to vote in Rohnert Park? Yes: ~ No:
What year did you became a Rohnert Park Resident: 1987
Employer: ace North America, a Canon Group Company
Address: 546 Portal Street, Suite A. Cotati CA 94931
Type of Business: Corporate Office Equipment/Software Sales
Specific Work Performed: Major Accounts Sales Manager
Do you have a High School Diploma? Yes
Other Degrees, Awards, etc. American Legion Award
Signature
8/20/2011
Date
ITY CLERK'S OFFICE: 130 Avram Avenue Rohnert Park CA 94928
(Form approved by City Council 1/7/03)
M:\Commissioll-Committcc-Board Appo;ntmcf1{s\Fnrms\FACT SHEET.DOC
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 12
r lICitp of~onomfl
r No, 1 1 he Plaza
Sonoma, California 95476-6618
, Phone (707)938-3681 Fax (707) 938-8775
I J:>-jyiz-ii/; cifyhaJi@I;sono';1dcityolg
,::
~~-"----_.._~------:-. -~~-Ol\
Aswan, Amb RebulJlic of Egypt
ChambollecMusigny, France
Greve in ChiantI. Italy
Kaniv, Ukraine
Patzcuaro, Mexico
September 8, 2011
Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association of Sonoma County
Board of Directors
Dear Mayors:
The Board of DirectorsoftheMayors' and Councilmembers' Association of Sonoma County will
hold its fourth regular meeting of 2011 on October 13, 2011, in the City of Petaluma.
One of the major business items for this meeting will be to consider appointments to the
following:
North Bay Division, LOCC Executiveaoard - TWO POSITIONS
(MCASC is. represented on the E .Board by two members plus an alternate. Terms are two years
from the date of appointment)
1. To fill the term vacated by Kathleen Shaffer upon her appointment as the Second Vice
President of the Division.
2. To fill the other position that has been vacant fora while.
Sonoma County Child Care Planning Council- ONE POSITION
(Term is three years frorn the date of appointment)
1. To fill the expiring term (12f31l11) of Marsha Vas Dupre (Santa Rosa)
Because time is ofthe>essence, please ask your Councilmembers to submit their leUersof
interest to the Mayors in the Sonoma County Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association and to
Gay Johann, City Clerk, City of Sonoma, #t The Plaza, Sonoma CA95476 no later than
September 22, 2011. This should provide enough time to allow review at each of your Council
meetings prior to the October 13, 2011 Board meeting.
S~~4lbW
Laurie Gallian
Mayor
City of Sonoma
QCitp of $ononta
No. 1 The Plaza
Sonoma, California 95476-6618
Phone (707) 938-3681 Fax (707) 938-8775
E.Mail: cityhal/@sol1omacity.org
September 12, 2011
Sonoma County Mayors and Council Members
Re: Application for North Bay Division, League of California Cities- Executive Board
Dear Mayors and Councilmembers,
I am submitting a new letter of interest for your consideration to fill the position on the
Executive Board of the North Bay Division of the League of Cities.
Thank you for your most recent support for appointment as Alternate on the North Bay Division
Executive Board. Recently with the election of Kathleen Shaffer as the Second Vice President of
the North Bay Division, there are now two openings for Executive Board membership. I would
appreciate your continued support and request that you appoint me to this position.
This year I have been Mayor for the City of Sonoma. I am also honored to serve this year as the
Chair of the Mayor's and Councih:nember's Association. It has been my distinct honor to
currently serve as your representative on the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and
Open Space District Advisory Committee since June 2009. I serve and am currently the Vice
Chair of the Committee. I have also served on the subcommittee for Matching Grants and
currently serve on the Stewardship Committee.
Besides serving on the Ag Preservation and Open Space District, prior to elected office I served
on the 2007 Sonoma County Community Climate Action Plan Committee. In 2008, I entered
into elected office in Sonoma and serve on the Sonoma County Transportation Authority and
Regional Climate Protection Authority, Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District, and the Water
Advisory Committee.
It is my intent to represent as I do now the interests of all the cities and towns in Sonoma
County. I am well informed as to other cities and town with issues confronting the landscape of
this county. I am a strong proponent for Redevelopment Agencies and their merit to our
communities. I work collaboratively with all agencies to have challenging issues presented and
discussed. I believe in being firm and fair. It is most important to listen and represent this
community. Engaging the public in a civil and professional manner to get results is a goal I
strive for. I have a vision of leadership that watches out for the future generations. I am
accessible and connect with people and issues.
I have attended the initial League Leadership training and am in my second year of the
Advanced Leadership training. I am in communication with our Representative Nancy Bennett
Hall, as well as local County Assembly members and Senate representative. I have collaborated
on many issues as well as serve with our SO CO Board of Supervisors on local Boards and
Committees.
I eagerly anticipate the possibility of representing you on the NB LOCC Executive Board and
accept the challenge to work collaboratively in a regional cities leadership approach to explore
and support our cities and town in the challenges and successes in Sonoma County for today
and future generations.
Thank you for your consideration and I would very much 'appreciate your support for this
appointment. Feel free to contact me at laurlegallian@comcast.net or at (707) 738~9847.
Sincerely,
.."-1
_.,..1 ,-(:.',,... /"" ,// // . --
.~v ., '~. /{o'
y? 'I ,& ,(/'t' "
. .,,(J!I (/~{L. y~ ra-vf.....t.-~jL.
: /7""-' /
.....~_...--_f J
Laurie Gallian
Mayor
City of
Sant,cl ~R()sa
September 14,2011
Sonoma County Mayors and Council Members
c/o Gay Johann
City Clerk. City of Sonoma
No.1 The Plaza
Sonoma. CA 95476
Re: North Bay Division, League of California Cities Executive Board
Dear Mayors and Council Members:
I am pleased to submit my letter of consideration for one of the positions on the Executive
Board for the North Bay Division of the League of Cities. I am seeking this position as I believe
I have skills which will be of benefit to the organization.
Scott Bartley Over the years I have devoted a great amount of time serving on various boards and
Councilmember commissions, both with the City of Santa Rosa, The American Institute of Architects, and
Sonoma County Non-Profits.
With the City of Santa Rosa, in addition to currently serving on City Council, I spent seven years
on the Planning Commission (four of those years serving as Chair), along with serving ten years
on the Design Review Board. During my time on the Commission and Board I was involved in
the development of every planning document the City currently uses.
In my service on City Council I have chaired the Mayor's Pension Task Force and currently
serve on the Mayor's Gang Prevention Task Force, along with representing Council on the Art
in Public Places Committee and the Courthouse Square Reunification Committee.
As an architect, I have also been involved in the American Institute of Architects, serving as
President of the Redwood Empire Chapter. I have also served as a Director on the State Board
of the California Council of the American Institute of Architects, and am past-chair of the Bay
Area Forum of the AIACC.
I also attended the New Mayors and Council Members Academy, recently attended the
Legislative Action Days. and I completed the Advanced Leadership Workshop of the League.
Additionally, as a Planning Commissioner, I have attended several of the League's Planners
Institutes.
I believe my experience with both government and professional advocacy groups, along with my
recent experience with the League, give me the qualifications for this position, and I ask for your
support.
Very truly yours,
~-~
sc~le;, ~~ I
Council Member
SPB/sks
CITY COUNCIL
100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Room 10. Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Phone: (707) 543.3010 . Fax: (707) 543..3030
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 13.6.2
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
September 21, 2011
1:30 PM
Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Council Chambers
575 Administration Drive
Room iOOA
Santa Rosa, CA
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of the August 17, 2011, Regular Board Meeting Minutes and the August 22,
2011, Special Board Meeting Minutes
3. Public Comment on Non-agenda Items (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes)
4. Board Member Announcements
5. General Manager's Report
6. Consent Agenda
a. Approval of Monthly Cost Report
b. Approval of a Resolution of local support for the application for $3,000,000 in
Regional Transportation Improvement Program, Transportation Enhancement
funds for the construction of the multi-use pathway within the Initial Operating
Segment in Sonoma County
c. Approval of AECOM Contract Amendment NO.4
d. Approval ofa Resolution Relating to Employer Paid Member Contributions to the
California State Employees Retirement System (CaIPers) and Approval of a
Resolution to Tax Defer Member Paid Contributions to the California State
Employs Retirement System (CaIPers) under Internal Revenue Code Section
414(H)(2)(Employer Pick-up)
7. Real Estate Committee Update/Report
Page 1 of 2
8. Closed Session:
a) Conference with Legal Counsel: Existing Litigation - Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit
District v. Todd Associates, LLC; SCV-248274 (Govt. Code Section 54956.9(a)).
b) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation or Significant Exposure to
Litigation (Govt. Code Section 54956.9(b)).
c) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation or Significant Exposure to
Litigation (Govt. Code Section 54956.9(b)).
d) Conference with Legal Counsel: Initiation of Litigation - Gov't Code Section 54956.9 (c)
9. Report out of Closed Session
10. Next Board of Directors Meeting: October 19, 2011, 1:30 PM, San Rafael City Hall
Council Chambers, 1400 Fifth Street, San Rafael, CA
Next Regular Real Estate Committee Meeting: October 5, 2011, 10:00 AM, San Rafael
Corporate Center, 750 Lindaro Street, 1st Floor, TAM Conference Room, San Rafael, CA
Next Regular Executive Committee Meeting: October 5, 2011, 12:00 PM, San Rafael
Corporate Center, 750 Lindaro Street, 1st Floor, TAM Conference Room, San Rafael, CA
Next Regular Operations Committee Meeting: October 12, 2011, 1:30 PM, San Rafael
Corporate Center, 750 Lindaro Street, 1st Floor, TAM Conference Room, San Rafael, CA
11. Adjournment
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: if you have a disability that requires the agenda materials to be in an alternate
format or that requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact
SMART at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation. Please conta.ct the
Office of the District Clerk at (415) 226-0893 for information.
DOCUMENTS: Documents distributed by SMART for its monthly Board meeting or committee meetings, and which
are not otherwise privileged, may be inspected at SMART's office located at 750 Lindaro Street, Suite 200, San
Rafael, CA 94901 during regular business hours. Documents may also be viewed on SMART's website at:
www.sonomamarintrain.org. Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to SMART after distribution of
the agenda packet are available for public inspection at the SMART Office located at 750 Lindaro Street, Suite 200,
San Rafael, CA 94901 during regular business hours.
For information about accessing SMART meetings by public transit, use the trip planner at www.511.org.
Page 2 of 2
2
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 13.B.4
RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED AS~
JOINT MEETING OF THE.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS/TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
September 22, 2011, 10:00 AM
Ukiah City Council Chambers
300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482
RUSSIAN RIVER
WATERSHED ASSOCIATION
AGENDA
A. Call to Order and Introductions
B. Approval of the Agenda
C. Approval of Standing Items
. Minutes: July 28, 2011 Board of Directors Meeting
D. BODITWG Business
. Coordination with Partner Agencies
o Sotoyome Resource Conservation District - Watershed Day, Valerie
Minton presenting
. Environmental Columns for 2011
. NCIRWMP Update
. RRWA Web Site
. Creek Signs
. Creek Week 2011 - RRWA Proclamation
. Stormwater Citizens Advisory Group
. Phase II Stormwater Update: RRWA Comments - Oral and Written
. Safe Medicine Disposal Program
. Recent and Ongoing Advocacy Items
o Update on Sept 15 meeting with RWQCB EO and staff
o Next meeting with RWQCB EO and staff - December 2011
o RRWA update to RWQCBI Russian River-Friendly Resolution and
Video Contest "Greatest Hits" - Sept 29, 2011
E. Meeting Schedule
. BOD - December 8, 2011 - Update from RWQCB Executive Officer; SCWA
Presentation - Water Smart Development Guidebook; Selection of Map
Layers; and Work Planning 2012-2013 Kick-Off
. TWG - October 11,2011
F. Items of Interesf
G. Public Comment
H. Adjourn
The Russian River Watershed Association complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals
with disabilities upon request.
Please contact Executive Director, Virginia Porter, at (707) 833-2553 with any questions.
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
Item No. 14
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
September 27, 2011 Meeting
1. PG&E
Notification of Filing Gas Transmission Pipeline Safety
Enhancement Plan
Items for Council Consideration
Support CourseCo Lease Renegotiation
Request letter from City requesting Smart Meter citizen opt-out
9/15/11
2. Milo lIIicht Resident
3. Michael Jacobvitz / Resident
4. Karen Hudson
9/16/11
9/19/11
9/19/11
SEPTEMBER 8, 2011
TO: STATE, COUNTY AND CITY OFFICIALS
RECEIVED
S[P 1 5 2011
cny OF ROHN
NOTIFICATION OF FILING OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY'S ERY PARK
GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PLAN
R.11-02-019
What is the Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan Filing?
On June 9, 2011, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) issued its Decision Determining Maximum
Allowable Operating Pressure Methodology and Requiring Filing Of Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Replacement
Or Testing Implementation Plans (0.11-06-017). 0.11-06-017 requires all California natural gas transmission
operators to develop and file an Implementation Plan setting forth criteria for which segments of natural gas pipelines
that were not strength tested, or lack sufficient details related to performance of any such test, are identified for
strength testing or replacement. 0.11-06-017 also states that the Implementation Plan must include interim safety
enhancement measures that will enhance public safety during the implementation period and that the Implementation
Plan must consider retrofitting pipelines to allow for in-line inspection tools and, where appropriate, automated shut-
off valves.
DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT THIS FILING
On August 26, 2011, PG&E filed its proposed, two-phase, Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan (or Implementation
Plan) with the CPUC in compliance with 0.11-06-017, requesting changes to its Gas Transmission and Storage
(GT&S) rates effective January 1, 2012. Phase 1 (2011-2014) targets pipeline segments that are in highly populated
urban areas, have vintage seam welds that do not meet modern standards, or are "grandfathered" under current
regulations and have not been strength tested. Phase 2 (commencing in 2015) targets pipeline segments that have
been previously strength tested or are in rural areas.
In this filing, PG&E seeks approval of the work scope proposed for both phases of the Implementation Plan, and
proposes a three-year adjustment to rates for 2012 through 2014 for Phase 1 work. Cost recovery for Phase 2 will be
addressed in a subsequent filing with the Commission. PG&E also presents how the costs to operate its
. transmission and storage business will be assigned to each customer class.
The Implementation Plan focuses on the following key areas:
Pipeline Modernization Prooram - During Phase 1, PG&E proposes to strength test 783 miles, replace 186 miles,
upgrade 199 miles of pipe to allow for in-line inspection, and in-line inspect 234 miles.
Valve Automation Proqram - During Phase 1, PG&E proposes to automate 228 valves, which includes remote-
controlled valves (RCV) in urban areas and automatic shut-off valves (ASV) in populated areas that cross earthquake
faults. In addition, PG&E will enhance its Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system to provide
operators additional information, tools, and training to allow for early detection and quick response to pipeline rupture
events. PG&E will also conduct a study to evaluate potential SCADA expansion and improvement.
Pipeline Records Inteoration Prooram - This program consists of two work efforts: (1) collecting and verifying all
pipeline strength tests and pipeline features data necessary to calculate the maximum allowable operating pressure
(MAOP) of all gas transmission pipelines and associated components, and (2) transition away from relying on
traditional paper records by consolidating data into integrated, core data management systems and building materials
traceability for gas transmission pipeline components from receipt, through installation, to retirement from service.
Interim Safety Enhancement Measures - PG&E's Implementation Plan includes the following interim safety
enhancement measures: (1) validate the MAOP for all gas transmission pipelines in the system, (2) interim pressure
reductions and (3) increased leak surveys and patrols.
This filing does not address distribution (gas lines handling reduced pressure) rates or the commodity costs of gas.
Rates for PG&E's gas distribution services, and the rates PG&E charges for natural gas itself, are set in separate
CPUC proceedings.
Will rates increase as a result of this filing?
Yes, if the CPUC approves PG&E's request, a typical residential customer using 37 therms per month would
see an average monthly gas bill increase of $1.93, from $45.23 to $47.16. A typical small business customer
1
'y
using 287 therms per month would see an average monthly gas bill increase of $14.95, from $279.80 to
.. $294,75. Individual customers' bills may differ
A table illustrating the impact of the requested $247:3 million increase in gas revenue for 2012, on each
customer class, was included in a bill insert mailed directly to customers beginning earlier this month.
In addition to the $247.3 PG&E is seeking for 2012, PG&E also requests Implementation Plan revenue requirements
for 2013 and 2014 of $220.8 million and $300.6 million, respectively. This money will be used to implement the work
scope indicated in the Implementation Plan related to pipeline modemization, valve automation, pipeline records
integration, and interim safety enhancement measures, all in a safe and reliable manner.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
To request a copy of the filing and exhibits or for more details, call PG&E at 1-800-743-5000.
For TDDmY (speech-hearing impaired), call 1-800-652-4712.
Para mas detalles lIame aI1-800-660-6789. ~ m aR ~ 'il1-800-893-9555
You may request a copy of the filing and exhibits by writing to:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Gas Transmission Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan
P.O. Box 7442, San Francisco, CA 94120.
THE CPUC PROCESS
The CPUC's Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) will review this filing.
The DRA is an independent arm of the CPUC, created by the Legislature to represent the interests of all utility
customers throughout the state and obtain the lowest possible rate for service consistent with reliable and safe
service levels. The DRA has a multi-disciplinary staff with expertise in economics, finance, accounting and
engineering. The DRA's views do not necessarily reflect those of the CPUC. Other parties of record may also
participate.
The CPUC may hold evidentiary hearings where parties of record present their proposals in testimony and are
subject to cross-examination before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). These hearings are open to the public, but
only those who are parties of record may present evidence or cross-examine witnesses during evidentiary hearings.
Members of the public may attend, but not participate in, these hearings.
After considering all proposals and evidence presented during the hearing process, the ALJ will issue a draft
decision. When the CPUC acts on this filing, it may adopt all or part of PG&E's request, amend or modify it, or deny
the filing. The CPUC's final decision may be different from PG&E's filing.
If you would like to learn how you can participate in this proceeding or if you have comments or questions, you may
contact the CPUC's Public Advisor as follows:
Public Advisor's Office
505 Van Ness Avenue
Room 2103
San Francisco, CA 94102
1-415-703-2074 or 1-866-849-8390 (toll free)
TTY 1-415-703-5282 or TTY 1-866-836-7825 (toll free)
E-mail topublic.advisor@cpuc.ca.gov
If you are writing a letter to the Public Advisor's Office, please include the number of
the filing (R.11-02-019) to which you are referring. All comments will be circulated to the Commissioners, the
assigned Administrative Law Judge and the Energy Division staff.
A copy of PG&E's Gas Transmission Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan and exhibits are also available for review at
the California Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m.-
noon, and on the CPUC's website at http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/puc/.
2
September 12,2011
RECEIVED
SEP 1 6 2011
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
.1'
;/
r
'f
. I
~I t./..l
!~ ..
i~il
\ {r
Milo lllich
300 Enterprise Drive # 237
Rohnert Park CA 94928-7817
miloni@aol.com
707-541-6829
Rohnert Park;
City Council
Planning Commission
Public Works
Police Department
Four items for your consideration.
1. Can you court Kaiser Permanente to move their over
crowded Rohnert Park Facility to take over the old State
Farm area? It has bus service near it and soon a train
station. Both a big advantage to Kaiser Members in Central
Sonoma as well a our City.
2. Most of Enterprise Drive is RESIDENTIAL, yet there are
no posted Speed Limit Signs. It is hard to cross the street
because cars use this as an alternative to the Expressway
and SPEED, especially during commute times, sometimes to
the squealing of wheels when they come off of Commerce. I
believe that for Residential Areas, the State Speed Limit is
35 MPH, especially from Commerce to where Enterprise
turns at the tracks, and then some help could be beneficial
there as well. Other than that, more Stop Signs?
3. There is no Street Marker Sign for Hunter on Enterprise
where Hunter Drive joins it. Also Hunter Drive does have
Posted Speed Limit Signs.
- 2 -
4. For more safety at crosswalks.
Approximately 100 yards, or more [depending on the Speed
Limit] on the flowing side of an on coming Cross Walk,
placing 3 rows of those "White Dots" used for Dividing
Lanes, about a yard apart, might alert drivers that a cross
walk is there, and each and every time a repeated driver
crosses one this could send a message to their Brain to be
more alert.
> > > > > Traffic Row
CROSS WALK
Dots
.~~.. -II
. ,.. - --II
. II + II
.
. II + II
.
. II + II
.
. II + II
.
. II + II
. II + II
.
. II + II
.
. II + II
.
.11 + II
. . . . . II + II
II ... II
II + II
II + II
II + II
II + II
II + II
II + II
II + II
II .A- ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.-- .
.
.
.
.
.
.
: Traffic Row < < < < <
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . .
Dots
Thank you all for looking at these issues in making Rohnert
Park a quieter and safer place to live.
Lidster, Beth
From: michael jacobvitz [michaeljacobvitz @gmail.com] iiA- %.,J A V L.L,r
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 12:55 PM SEP 1 9 2011
To: Admin
Subject: Support CourseCo Lease Renegotiation CfJY OF ROHNERT PARK
Dear Mr. Gonzalez:
I support the City's effort to renegotiate with CourseCo as I think CourseCo has done an outstanding job managing the courses and serving the golf community. , Not only have they
improved our courses (especially the North Course) drawing regional golfers from across the Bay Area, but they have also staffed the courses with very friendly and service -
oriented staff. As a resident single golfer often paired with others, I find many of the players surprised at finding Rohnert Park such a beautiful city in large part due to the golf
courses winding across the city. The courses provide habitat for wildlife, beautiful viewsheds for residents, and affordable golf for all ages and incomes.
I think the City should rent the courses for free to CourseCo and make a profit sharing arrangement. It is a win -win as the City would not have to spend money on course expenses
or marketing and would reap income as the courses generate revenues and profits. it might also allow.CourseCo to maintain the current pricing structure to retain current regulars
and attract more golfers through marketing and aggressive pricing.
Please pass my email on to whomever from the City is involved with the renegotiation of the lease. Thanks.
Michael Jacobvitz
1057 Hawthorne Circle
Rohnert Park
From:
Sent:
To:
~~<3
Tim & Karen [nOsdU.h01@gmaiI.COm1c,,-S('p, ~lv~r-
Friday, September 16, 2011 5:15 PM "# YO 9. u
Griffin, Terri; eolivares@cLsanta-rosa.ca.us; dthompSOn@Ci.cotati.ca.f~oft 20;;
cityclerk@ci.petaluma.ca.us ~~<9
Fwd: City of Solvang sends letter to the CPUC for no cost SM opt out )' I>~.t
Griffin, Terri
Subject:
Dear Mayors,
Please consider supporting your constituents by writing a letter similar to the one written by Solvang to the
CPUC.
Thank-you for your consideration and support on this important issue. Many people are being forced to leave
their homes because of health problems related to Smart Meters. Others are concerned about fires, privacy
issues, potential health dangers, and rate increases. The World Health Organization classified non-ionizing RF
radiation as a possible carcinogen (class 2B) with lead, DDT, chloroform, and engine exhaust. This non-
ionizing RF radiation is being emitted from Smart Meters into homes schools, businesses, and our environment
from 1-3 times a minute, 24 hours a day. People should have the right to to choose an opt without charge.
Respectfully,
Karen Hudson
Sonoma County Citizens Against Smart Meters
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sandi Maurer <ispirit@sonic.net>
Date: Fri, Sep 16,2011 at 7:57 AM
Subject: City of Solvang sends letter to the CPUC for no cost SM opt out
To: california-emf-safety -coali tion <california -emf-safety -coali tion@googlegroups.com>
http://www.santaynezvalleyiournaI.com/archive/9/37/8950/
The Solvang City Council decided Monday night to send a letter to California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) asking them to allow a no-cost, opt-out program for people who wanted their smart meters removed.
1
9/27/11 City Council Agenda
ITEM NO. 15.B
RECEIVED
SEP 1 3 2011
Cl1Y OF ROHNERT PARK
September 11, 2011
City Council
City Hall
Attention: Beth Lidster
130 A vram A venue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
RE: City Council Donation for Annual Thanksgiving Dinner
Dear City Council:
I would, once again, like to request a $500 donation from the Council to support the Annual
Thanksgiving Dinner served on Thanksgiving for the community of Rohnert Park. I would
also like to request the use of the Rohnert Park Senior Center to serve the dinner. As, in
the past, the funds and building use will be use specifically for the dinner.
This will be the 231"d year we have been able to provide this community service to the
community. Thank you for your continued support of this dinner.