Loading...
2008/06/24 City Council Agenda PacketJudy Hauff City Clerk a� „vERT r Rx City Hall 19 Gz CA LIFOR���' City of Rohnert Park *6750 Commerce Boulevard *Rohnert Park, California 94928 Phone: i(707)588 -2227 ♦ FAX: (707)588 -2274 ♦ WEB: www.rpcity.org ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL Community Development Commission Rohnert Park Financing Authority CONCURRENT MEETINGS AGENDA Tuesday, June 24 2008 MEETING LOCATION: CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, California The Rohnert Park City Council welcomes your attendance, interest and participation at its regular concurrent city meetings scheduled on the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays of each month at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. City Council /CDC /RPFA Agendas and Minutes maybe viewed at the City's website www rpcity.ora Council /CDC /RPFA may discuss and /or take action on any or all of the items listed on this agenda. If you challenge decisions of the City Council, the Community Development Commission, or the Rohnert Park Financing Authority of the City of Rohnert Park in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearing(s) described in this Agenda, or in written correspondence 'delivered to the City of Rohnert Park at, or prior to the public hearing(s). DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City Offices at (707) 588 -2227 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation by the City. Please make sure the City Manager's office is notified as soon as possible if you have a visual impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another format (Braille, audio -tape, etc.) 6:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - Call to Order Roll Call (Breeze Smith Stafford Vidak- Martinez Mackenzie ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION TO CONSIDER: • Litigation Matters CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) Stutrud v. City of Rohnert Park, Court of Appeal I” Appellate District Case No. Al 18408 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) Simes, et al. v. City of Rohnert Park, Sonoma County Superior Court Case No.: SCV 166309 City of Rohnert Park CONCURRENT MEETING Agenda (2 of 5) June 24, 2008 or City Council/Community Development Commission /Rohnert Park Financing Authorit 6:30 p.m. RECONVENE REGULAR SESSION Pledge of Allegiance MAYOR'S REF PORT ON CLOSED SESSION't( nx7ernment Code ,§ 54957 1) 2. MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS i Mayor's Presentation of a Proclamation Recognizing 'Public Safety Officer Jim Brady 3. UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES /COMMENTS: For public comment on items listed or not listed on the agenda, or on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time (limited to 3 -5 minutes per appearance and 'a 30 minute total time limit, or allocation of time based on number of speaker cards submitted) - PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING — *SEE NOTE ON LAST PAGE OF THIS AGENDA 4. CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the consent calendar will be considered together by one action of the Council unless any Council Member or anyone else interested' in a consent calendar item has a question about the item. 1. Approval of City Bills /Demands for Payment 2. Resolutions for Adoption: 2008 -91 Making a Determination of Public Necessity and Convenience for Hampton Inn and Suites at 6248 Redwood Drive (APN 143- 391 -092) 2008 -92 Authorizing and Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Sonoma - Marin Saving Water Partnership 2008 -93 Authorizing the Expenditure of Funds Prior to the Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 Municipal Budget 2008 -94' Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the City Of Rohnert Park for the 2008 -09 Fiscal Year Pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution 2008 -95 Recognizing and Honoring Michael Bracewell for His Dedicated Service as Interim Public Works Manager 5. STADIUM' AREA MASTER PLAN (5900 LABATH AVENUE) — Consideration of a Rezoning (Stadium Area Master Plan - Final Development Plan)' to permit up to 338 residential units and 140,000 square feet of commercial over 29.8 acres (File No. PL2004- 063EIR, GPAM, RZ (FDP)) 1. Staff Report 2. Public Comments City of Rohnert Park CONCURRENT MEETING Agenda (3 of 5) June 24, 2008 for Citv Council /Community Develovment Commission / Rohnert Park Financine Authority 3. Ordinance for Adoption: Waive Further Reading and Adopt Ordinance by Reading Title: No. 799 Amending the Official Zoning Map and Adopting a,Final Development Plan (Stadium Area Master Plan) for Property Located at 5900 Labath Avenue; APNs 143 -040 -116 and A 17(part) - File No. PL2004 -063RZ and PL2004- 063PD (Redwood Equities, LLC) • Council motion • Council discussion • Council roll call vote 6. FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET — Consideration of Adoption of the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for 2008 -2013 and Approval of Projects for Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 1. Staff Report 2. Public Comments 3. Resolution for Adoption: 2008 -96 Adopting the Five -Year Capital Improvements Program for Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 through Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 and Approving Projects for Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 • Council motion • Council discussion • Council vote 7 COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND /OR OTHER REPORTS 1. Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association meeting, 6/12 (JM /TS /VVM) 2. Waste & Recycling Subcommittee meeting, 6/13 (AB /TS) . 3. Sonoma County Waste Management Agency meeting, 6/18 (TS) 3. Other informational reports, if any Councilmember Smith: 2008 Economic Briefing Breakfast: Recovery or Recession, 6/20; Jewish Community Free Clinic Open House, 6/22; other reports, if any Council Member Breeze: other reports, if any Council Member Vidak- Martinez: Tribute to Bob Blanchard, 6/17; other reports, if any Vice -Mayor Stafford: Tribute to Bob Blanchard, 6/17; Welcoming the Native Daughters of the ;Golden West — Annual Grand Parlor meeting, 6/19; Jewish Community Free Clinic Open House (6/22); other reports, if any Mayor Mackenzie: other reports, if any 8. COMMUNICATIONS Copies of other communications have been provided to Council for review prior to this meeting. Council Members desiring to read or discuss any communication may do so at this time. 9. MATTERS FROM /FOR COUNCIL 1. Calendar of Events A. Council Meetings Scheduled on Holidays - Council consideration of rescheduling regular meeting dates that fall on September 91h (California Admission Day) and November 1 It" (Veterans Day) • Council discussion /direction /action 2. City Council Agenda Forecast 3. Other informational items, if any i v. CITY MANAGER' S /CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS 1. Other informational items, if any 11. PUBLIC, COMMENTS ADJOURN the City Council meeting to CONVENE the meeting of the Community Development Commission COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (CDC) OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AGENDA Tuesday, June 24, 2008 Meeting Location: City Hall, 6750 Commerce Blvd., Rohnert Park, CA CDC MEETING - Call to Order Roll Call (Breeze Smith Stafford Vidak- Martinez Mackenzie) Unscheduled public appearances - for public comment on agenda items or other matters 1. CDC WORK SESSION Work Session Item for Review, Discussion and /or Direction: • CDC Budget for Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 2. CDC CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the consent calendar will be considered together by one action of the Commission unless any Commissioner or ,anyone else interested in a consent calendar item has a question about the item. 1. Approval of CDC Bills /Demands for Payment 2. Resolutions for Adoption: 2008 -08 Authorizing the Expenditure of Funds Prior to the Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 Community Development Commission Budget 3. ADJOURNMENT of CDC meeting CANCELLATION NOTICE JUNE 24, 2008 ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY (RPFA) MEETING xxxxxxxxxxxx DUE TO LACK OF BUSINESS THE JUNE 24, 2008 ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING IS CANCELLED City of Rohnert Park CONCURRENT MEETING Agenda (5 of 5) June 24, 2008 or Cit y Council/Community Development Commission /Rohnert Park Financing Aut /zorit CERTIFICATION OF FOSTI NG Ole' AGE NVA 1, Terri Griffin, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Rohnert Park, declare that the foregoing agenda for the June 24, 2008, Regular Concurrent Meeting of the Rohnert Park City Council /CDC /RPFA was posted and available for review on June 18, 2008, at City Hall of the City of Rohnert Park, 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, California 94928. The agenda is also available on the City web site at www.rpcity.or2, Signed this 18`x' day of June, 2008, at Rohnert Park, California. Terri Griffin, Deputy City Clerk JH /'PG:062408 AGENDA- RPCity Council- CDC- RPFA.doc COURTESY AGENDA 06/24/08 cc: J. Hauff, City Clerk (2) T. Griffin, Deputy City Clerk K. Leonard, Shorthand Reporter Kathy Dennison Rohnert Park - Cotati Regional Library 6250 Lynne Conde Way Rohnert Park, CA 94928 NOTE: Place marker on agenda for each individual recipient. Linda Beltz 6182 San Bruno Court Rohnert Park, CA 94928 PSO Jim Brady Public Safety Department (Item No. 2) �II R116 Distr. a Mtg. Of. cc: cc: File: -- v S 41 o 0 U ° U a� n 3 U Cd ate' 0 '" x o m 0 "O i0+ O � � O i-i � 4 U U Q ^1 o ° y 0 Q. cd 0 4 to � q � O r. N Q, JjnL o � d y ° � w O U >, u ti �II R116 Distr. a Mtg. Of. cc: cc: File: -- 0 0 N 4>� 0 N N w v Cb ,a fowv'� L O d �N C Y 0 m m 41 o 0 U ° U a� n 3 U Cd 0 '" x o 3 0 "O i0+ i-i 0 U ° y 0 Q. cd to 0 0 ° O r. N Q, F ° U >, a � Cd U r-+ 'L7 i cC O a> cd 'C 0 o , O V s; 3 a w o C's U M o -°o o ° Cc: Cc ° a. cd . C'i vi cd H W Z J c� cd 0 0 N 4>� 0 N N w v Cb ,a fowv'� L O d �N C Y 0 m m DATE: June 24, 2008 Council: MEMORANDUM M'S{ Office of the City Manager coe CLOSED SESSIC� Copy o: Com to: TO: Honorable Mayor Mackenzie and Members of the City Council FROM: Stephen R. Donley, City Manager SUBJECT: CLOSED SESSION ITEM: SEWER RATES S 4 y� LL 2 CONFIDERTIAL — - -- r CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD Date: %'� Item #: Name: Gc" ..- Phone: 2 CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD Date: Y/' 'v b Item #: Name: yIC;�Vva . k l Address: - Phone: s TOPIC: t✓ + v ^�11��'/y%(L� Brief Summary of Comments: CITY OF ROHNERT PARK BILLS FOR APPROVAL June 24, 2008 Check # 178555 - 178910 Dated June 5 - 18, 2008 Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6/18/08 -TG Copy to: $2,441,101.30 TOTAL $2,441,101.30 as Q w aQ a w Q Q w w Q Lill .Q W Q r�� ti A H 2 C� w 2 N w Y Oz 0O wQ EDED t7 � Cl) O W C/)T U_ T O z u"QwO z z _jW a 0 ao N U Ow w z w 0 U_ z O U U) ITEM Nn. 2 Council: X Miscellaneous o� Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6 /18 /08 -TG Copy to: w w ti N V C7 r Q C� V K * z o z x � Ue y w d 0 o� z v ti A H 2 C� w 2 N w Y Oz 0O wQ EDED t7 � Cl) O W C/)T U_ T O z u"QwO z z _jW a 0 ao N U Ow w z w 0 U_ z O U U) ITEM Nn. 2 Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6 /18 /08 -TG Copy to: ao 0 0 N .ti 0 L O �N C v d Y Meeting Date: Department: Submitted By: Submittal Date: RESO. NO. 2008-91 Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 611$'08 -TG Copy to: CITY OF ROHNERT PARK COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT June 24, 2008 Community Development Department Susan Azevedo, Community Development Assistant June 3, 2008 Agenda Title: Determination of Public Necessity and Convenience for Beer and Wine Sales in a Convenience Store located at 6248 Redwood Drive (Hampton Inn and Suites) Requested Council Action: Approve Resolution Making Determination of Public Necessity and Convenience Summary: The applicant, Hampton Inn and Suites, has applied to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for a type 20 off -sale beer and wine license to offer for sale beer an wine in the convenience store contained in the lobby of the hotel. Because the ABC has determined that there is an over concentration of other alcoholic beverage outlets in the area, they have requested a determination by the City Council that the approval of the license serves a public necessity and convenience. Staff notes that the proposed "convenience" store contained within the hotel will also offer various sundries and personal care items that are intended to serve the daily needs of the hotel occupants. It is not intended to be a store catering to the general public so there are no concerns that the sale of beer and wine will have negative impacts on the surrounding area. Staff, therefore, recommends approval of the resolution. CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW: Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: J/-) Consent Item ( ) Regular Time Approval () Public Hearing Required ( ) Not Recommended () Submitted with Comment ( ) Policy Determination b Co ncil ( ) City Comments: / City Manager's Signature: Date: b / 3 O� RESOLUTION NO. 2008-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK MAKING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC NECESSITY AND CONVENIENCE FOR HAMPTON INN AND SUITES AT 6248 REDWOOD DRIVE (APN 143 - 391 -092) WHEREAS, Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4 provides that the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) may issue a license for off -sale retail alcohol sales despite an undue concentration of licenses if the local governing body determines within 90 days of notification of a completed application that public necessity or convenience would be served by the issuance; WHEREAS, Hampton Inn and Suites is a local hotel that features a convenience store in its lobby that provides various food, sundry and personal care items intended to serve the daily needs of hotel occupants; WHEREAS, the Rohnert Park Municipal Code allows convenience stores as a permitted use in the "C -R" Regional Commercial District and the operation is an accessory use to the hotel; and WHEREAS, the sale of beer and wine at this location is intended to serve hotel guests and not the general public and will be done in a manner that does not negatively impact the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park, California, finds that the granting of a Type 20 alcoholic beverage license to Hampton Inn and Suites at 6248 Redwood Drive (APN 143- 391 -092) serves a public necessity and convenience. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rohneh Park this 24th day of June, 2004. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings held on the 2nd & 4ih Tuesdays of each month: Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances & Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date Agenda Items w /attachments via email and hard copy to City Clerk DUE no later than NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted /distributed /mailed on Wednesday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.050 {This section for City Clerk Use Only) RESO. NO. 2008-92 Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6/18/08 -TG Copy to: E. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 Department: Engineering /Public Works Submitted By: Darrin Jenkins, Director of Public Works /City Engineer (Name & Title) Submittal Date: June 9, 2008 Agenda (subject only) Title: Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Sonoma -Marin Saving Water Partnership Requested Council Action: By resolution authorize and approve a Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Sonoma -Marin Saving Water Partnership Summary: The Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Sonoma -Marin Saving Water Partnership is an agreement between the following parties: Sonoma County Water Agency (Agency) City of Cotati City of Petaluma City of Rohnert Park City of Santa Rosa City of Sonoma North Marin Water District Valley of the Moon Water District Marin Municipal Water District Town of Windsor The MOU commits the City of Rohnert Park to the following: 1. Remain a member in good standing of the California Urban Water Conservation Council (CUWCC) 2. Implement the Best Management Practices of the CUWCC 3. Use best efforts to implement conservation measures that are conditions of the Agency's permits, metered billing of all customer accounts 4. Implement New Construction Water Conservation Measures as appropriate 5. Designate a responsible staff member for supporting conservation activities 6. Provide support and financial data for Agency staff administering regional support 7. Fund a minimum of $120,100 per year for local water conservation programs for the next 10 years. The City of Rohnert Park budgeted approximately $160,000 in conservation in 2007/08, so item 7 above should not present a hardship. The MOU also commits the other customers of the Agency listed above to the items above with a different dollar amount for conservation programs based on their percentage of water deliveries. Finally, the MOU commits the Agency to a number of actions similar to those of the contractors as well as an annual compilation and publication of conservation information on behalf of the MOU signatories. Enclosures: Resolution, Agreement CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW: Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: Consent Item ( ) Regular Time --]�) Approval O Public Hearing Required ( ) Not Recommended O Submitted with Comment ( ) Policy Determination by C ncil ( ) City Comments: City Manager's Signature: Date: �� (Revised 0105 7) H:TG- S:OS -b RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING SONOMA -MARIN SAVING WATER PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park is committed to water conservation and requires water conservation projects; WHEREAS, the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Sonoma -Marin Saving Water Partnership (hereinafter "MOU ") encourages regional conservation measures, programs, and reporting for the Sonoma County Water Agency water contractors; and WHEREAS, the MOU determines the amounts to be budgeted and expended by each Water Contractor and the Marin Municipal Water District for water conservation and maximizes cost- effective water conservation by the parties to this MOU. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it does hereby authorize and approve a Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Sonoma -Marin Saving Water Partnership by and between the City of Rohnert Park, a municipal corporation, and the following public agencies: Sonoma County Water Agency City of Cotati City of Petaluma City of Santa Rosa City of Sonoma North Marin Water District Valley of the Moon Water District Marin Municipal Water District Town of Windsor DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2008. ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DRAFT 02/22/2008 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Sonoma -Maria Saving Water Partnership This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is made by and between the following public agencies: SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY (Agency) CITY OF COTATI ( Cotati) CITY OF PETALUMA (Petaluma) CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ( Rohnert Park) CITY OF SANTA ROSA (Santa Rosa) CITY OF SONOMA (Sonoma) NORTH MARIN WATER DISTRICT (NMWD) VALLEY OF THE MOON WATER DISTRICT (VOMWD) MARIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT (MMWD) TOWN OF WINDSOR (Windsor) SECTION 1 - RECITALS 21 (a) The Sonoma County Water Agency (Agency) was created by California state 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 legislation (Statutes of 1949, Chapter 994 as amended). The Agency operates and maintains a water supply and transmission system (Transmission System) authorized by the Restructured Agreement for Water Supply between and among the Agency and eight Water Contractors: Cotati, Petaluma, Rohnert Park, Santa Rosa, Sonoma, Windsor, NMWD, VOMWD, dated June 23, 2006, by means of which water is furnished to the parties thereto. The Agency furnishes water to MMWD pursuant to the Third Amended Off -peak Water Supply Agreement and Agreement for Sale of Water Between the Sonoma County Water Agency and Marin Municipal Water District both of which were last amended by the Supplemental Water Supply Agreement dated January 25, 1996 (MMWD Agreements). 31 (b) The Restructured Agreement authorizes the Agency to undertake or fund any 32 cost effective Water Conservation Project that has been approved by the Water Advisory 33 Committee (WAC). Last printed 2/22/2008 Page 1 of 12 1 (c) As of the date of this MOU, the WAC has approved $15 million for implementing 2 conservation t i easur es over a 'Lei -year per lod con Iln lef )cing with Fiscal Year 1997-98. 3 (d) The Restructured Agreement establishes a Water Conservation Sub - Charge to 4 be deposited in a Water Conservation Fund created by the Agency. The Water Conservation 5 Fund shall be used only to pay or partially pay for the cost of Water Conservation Projects. The 6 aggregate amount of money to be received by the Agency from the Water Conservation Sub- 7 Charge for each fiscal year shall be sufficient to cover the Agency's estimate of the total cost of 8 all Water Conservation Projects for such fiscal year. 9 (e) The Restructured Agreement Section 1.12 sets forth the Water Conservation 10 Requirements that the Water Contractors must implement and encourages said parties to 11 implement Water Conservation Projects that go beyond those requirements. 12 (f). The parties to.this MOU recognize that establishing common water conservation 13 projects on a regional basis and applicable across the political and jurisdictional boundaries of 14 each party may be a means of cost effectively conserving more water than would otherwise be 15 conserved on an individual agency -by- agency basis. 16 (g) The parties to this MOU further recognize that the Restructured Agreement 17 establishes a Water Conservation Subcommittee (the Subcommittee) of the Technical Advisory 18 Committee (TAC) to the WAC to make recommendations with respect to Water Conservation 19 Requirements pursuant to the Restructured Agreement. 20 SECTION 2 - DEFINITIONS 21 The terms used in this MOU that are defined in Section 1.2 of the Restructured 22 Agreement shall have the meaning set forth in said Section 1.2, C Last printed 2/22/2008 Page 2 of 12 i SECTION 3 — PURPOSE 2 The purpose of this MOU is to determine the amounts to be budgeted and 3 expended by each Water Contractor and MMWD for water conservation, identify Water 4 Conservation Projects that the Subcommittee will consider for recommendation to the TAC, and 5 maximize cost - effective water conservation by the parties to this MOU in Sonoma and Marin 6 Counties. To this end, the Sonoma County Water Agency 2005 Urban Water Management 7 Plan identifies a cumulative target to reduce potable water demand by the year 2030 through 8 implementation of water conservation, local supply and recycled water projects. 9 SECTION 4 - COMMITMENT 10 (a) Each retail water provider signatory to this MOU (Cotati, Petaluma, Rohnert Park, I1 Santa Rosa, Sonoma, NMWD, VOMWD, MMWD and Windsor) commits to participate in the 12 following Regional Water Conservation Projects: i 13 (1) Remain as members in good standing of the California Urban Water 14 Conservation Council ( CUWCC), implement the Best Management Practices (BMPs) of 15 water conservation as are promulgated by CUWCC from time to time in the 16 "Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water Conservation in California ", or 17 implement alternative water conservation measures that secure at least the same level 18 of water savings, and complete and timely file the annual CUWCC report form; and 19 implement or use best efforts to secure the implementation of any water conservation 20 requirements that may be added as terms or conditions of the Agency's appropriative 21 water rights permits or license, or with which the Agency must comply under compulsion 22 of regulation or law. The parties shall require metered billing of all customer accounts 23 they serve. Last printed 2/22/2008 Page 3 of 12 1 (2) Implement the CUWCC BMPs either with: (i) internal staff, or (ii) (/ 2 administered by the d Agency through n C rati F �r.. ing d A.J..�,inist�ation \' y , �g-, y u n WU&I i a vo`�ipGC� c�u� c Funding �u {i �y anu r%u� ifs {JL al {Vi 1 3 Agreement between the party and Agency. It is understood that if a retail water provider 4 is maintaining compliance with any BMP, as determined by the CUWCC, further 5 participation in that BMP is at the discretion of the retail water provider. 6 (3) Implement New Construction Water Conservation Measures as 7 appropriate for the particular party from the list included herein as Attachment A: Draft 8 New Construction Water Conservation Measures. 9 (4) Implement various water conservation measures as may be appropriate 10 for the particular party that go beyond the implementation of the CUWCC BMPs and as 11 contemplated by the Agency's 2005 Urban Water Management Plan and included in 12 Attachment B, 13 (5) Designate a staff member responsible for: (i) submitting the BMP 14 Implementation Report; (ii) coordinating interaction between that party's management 15 and council/board with the Agency staff; (iii) representing the party on the Subcommittee 16 to propose any Water Conservation Project that will increase water conservation 17 amounts or efficiency, including CUWCC BMP compliance, Long Range and Annual 18 Water Saving Goals, and other water conservation related tasks as directed by the WAC 19 such as. addressing the Ahwahnee Water Principles, Leadership in Energy and 20 Environmental Design (LEED), or specific initiatives for regional benefit in the Sonoma- 21 Marin area. 22 (5) Provide customer service support (consumer billing, phone and CUWCC 23 BMP compliance data collection) for Agency staff administering Regional programs; Last printed 2/22/2008 Page 4 of 12 1 (6) Provide financial data support and cost accounting data for Agency and 2 partner staff administering the regional or partner specific programs; and 3 (7) Provide staff support to review new development plans and construction 4 for consistency with regional water conservation recommendations of the Subcommittee 5 and when requested make said data information available to the Agency staff 6 administering regional programs. 7 (b) The Agency, signatory to this MOU, is committed to participate in Regional Water 8 Conservation Projects as defined herein, including: 9 (1) Remain as a member in good standing of CUWCC; implement the 10 applicable BMPs of water conservation as are promulgated by CUWCC from time to 11 time in the "Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water Conservation in 12 California ", or implement alternative water conservation measures that secure at least 13 the same level of water savings, and complete and timely file the annual CUWCC report 14 form; and implement or use best efforts to secure the implementation of any water 15 conservation requirements that may be added as terms or conditions of the Agency's 16 appropriative water rights permits or license, or with which the Agency must comply 17 under compulsion of regulation or law. The Agency shall require metered billing of all 18 customer accounts they serve. Last printed 2/22/2008 Page 5 of 12 1 (2) Prepare and administer Funding and Administration Agreements with the 2 parties for carrying out regional Water Conservation Projects including, but not limited to, 3 Regional Residential and Commercial Clothes Washer Rebate, Regional Large 4 Landscape Water Use Survey, Regional Smart Controller Rebate, Regional Commercial 5 Water Use Assessment, and Regional End -Use Study. 6 (3) Compile necessary data and, in conjunction with the parties, publish an 7 annual report for the partnership detailing water conserved compared to plan and based 8 on best available techniques and industry standards. 9 (4) Pursue partnerships with other utilities to implement regional water 10 conservation programs. 11 12 SECTION 5 — FUNDING 13 Funding for the Partnership shall be from the Agency Water Conservation Fund and 14 expenditures by the Water Contractors and MMWD. For Water Contractors the Agency shall 15 calculate and collect, as a part of the Operations and Maintenance charge, a Water 16 Conservation Sub - Charge, which monies shall be deposited in the Water Conservation Fund. 17 For MMWD, not party to the Restructured Agreement, an equivalent amount shall be included 18 as a component of the Operation and Maintenance Charge and shall be deposited in the Water 19 Conservation Fund. 20 The aggregate amount of money to be received by the Agency for each Fiscal Year and 21 deposited to the Water Conservation Fund shall be sufficient to cover the Agency's estimate of 22 the total cost of all regional Water Conservation Projects for such Fiscal Year. 23 Page 6 of 12 Last printed 2/22/2008 I In addition to expenditures from the Water Conservation Fund noted above, from July 1, 2 2008 through July 20, 2018, a total of Fifteen Million Dollars ($15,000,000) shall be budgeted 3 and expended by the Water Contractors and MMWD to implement Water Conservation Projects 4 to achieve the quantifiable water savings established by the parties to this MOU. The 5 $15,000,000 shall be budgeted and expended by each Water Contractor and MMWD over the 6 next 10 years to support Water Conservation Projects benefiting the Water Contractors and 7 MMWD. The annual amount to be budgeted and expended by each Water Contractor is based 8 upon the prorated share of 3 -year average annual Agency water deliveries to each Water 9 Contractor and MMWD divided by the total Agency water deliveries to the Water Contractors to and MMWD for those 3 years. The annualized amount to be budgeted shall be as follows: 11 Cotati $25,375 (1.69 %); Petaluma $242,150 (16.14 %); Rohnert Park $120,100 (8.01%); Santa 12 Rosa $557,325 (37.15 %); Sonoma $55,000 (3.67 %); North Marin $240,525 (16.04 %); Valley of 13 the Moon $72,200 (4.81 %); Windsor $10,600 (0.71 %) and MMWD $176,725 (11.78 %); based 14 upon water deliveries in 2004, 2005 and 2006. The above annualized amounts shall be 15 adjusted in fiscal years 2012 and 2015 on the same prorated basis noted above to reflect then 16 current 3 -year average annual revised water deliveries. 17 Revenue from the Water Conservation Sub - Charge collected from Windsor by the is Agency for all water diverted by Windsor directly from the Russian River using its own facilities, 19 whether under Windsor's water rights or Agency's water rights, shall be placed in a separate 20 account by the Agency and made available to Windsor as additional funding for Water 21 Conservation Projects. Last printed 2122/2008 Page 7 of 12 1 SECTION 6 - WAIVER OF RIGHTS 2 OU ill Dy signing s M, the "y g y MOU, parties do not waive or relinquish any legal or equitable right 3 that they might otherwise have with respect to any of the actions, activities, or obligations 4 contemplated by the Restructured Agreement, except as expressly provided herein. 5 SECTION 7 - AMENDMENT OF MOU 6 Amendments, revisions or modifications to this MOU shall be in writing and shall be 7 executed by all parties to this MOU. 8 SECTION 8 - THIRD PARTY CLAIMS 9 It is not the intent of the parties to this MOU to create any third party beneficiaries. Any to failure to perform under the terms of this MOU shall not create any claim or right by any 11 individual or entity not a party to this MOU. 12 SECTION 9 - ENTIRE AGREEMENT 13 This writing is intended both as the final expression of agreement between and among 14 the parties hereto with respect to the included terms and as a complete and exclusive statement 15 of the terms of the MOU, pursuant to Civil Code §1896. 16 SECTION 10 - RELATION TO RESTRUCTURED AGREEMENT 17 The parties understand and agree that this MOU supplements the Restructured 18 Agreement for Water Supply and the MMWD Agreements. The parties agree that in the event 19 of an inconsistency between this MOU and the Restructured Agreement for Water Supply (or, 20 for the Agency and MMWD, between this MOU and the MMWD Agreements), the provisions of 21 the Restructured Agreement for Water Supply (or, for the Agency and MMWD, the MMWD 22 Agreements) shall control. Last printed 2/22/2008 Page 8 of 12 1 SECTION 11 -TERM OF MOU 2 The Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Sonoma -Marin Saving Water 3 Partnership shall become effective upon the signature of the parties hereto and shall remain in 4 effect until June 30, 2018 unless extended or terminated earlier. 5 6 SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY 7 8 9 10 By: Date: 11 Chair, Board of Directors 12 13 ATTEST: 14 15 16 Clerk, Board of Directors 17 18 19 CITY OF COTATI 20 21 By: Date: 22 Mayor 23 24 ATTEST: 25 26 27 City Clerk 28 29 30 31 CITY OF PETALUMA 32 33 By: Date: 34 Mayor 35 36 ATTEST: 37 38 39 City Clerk 40 41 Last printed 2/22/2006 Page 9 of 11 i CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 2 3 By: 4 Mayor 5 6 ATTEST: 7 8 9 City Clerk 10 11 12 13 CITY OF SANTA ROSA 14 15 By: Date: Date: 16 Mayor 17 18 ATTEST: 19 20 21 City Clerk 22 23 24 25 CITY OF SONOMA 26 27 By: Date: 28 City Manager 29 3o ATTEST: 31 32 33 City Clerk 34 35 36 NORTH MARIN WATER DISTRICT 37 38 By: 39 President 40 41 ATTEST: 42 43 44 Secretary 45 46 Date.: _ Page 10 of 11 Last printed 2/22/2008 1 2 VALLEY OF THE MOON WATER DISTRICT 3 4 By: Date: 5 President 6 7 ATTEST: 8 9 10 Secretary 11 12 13 14 MARIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 15 16 By: Date: 17 President 18 19 ATTEST: 20 21 22 Secretary 23 24 25 26 TOWN OF WINDSOR 27 28 By: Date: 29 Mayor 30 31 ATTEST: 32 33 34 Town Clerk 35 36 D7 Q 4 41 T: \GM\SCWA \Sonoma Marin SWP1Sonoma Marin MOU draft FINAL 022208.doc Last printed 2/22/2008 Page 11 of 11 ATTACHMENT A NEW CONSTRUCTION WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES Interior (i) Toilets and associated flush valves shall be rated at not more than 1.0 gallons per flush, or be a dual flush model approved by the District. (ii) Urinals and associated flush valves shall be rated at not more than 1.0 gallons per flush. (iii) Shower heads shall have a rated flow of 2.0 gallons per minute or less. (iv) Lavatory faucets shall have aerators or laminar flow deices together with flow control inserts, valves, devices or orifices that restrict flow to a maximum of approximately 1.5 gallons per minute. (v) Laundry facility washing machines shall be front loading / horizontal axis models with an Energy Star rating and a modified water factor of 5.5 or less. (vi) Dishwashers shall be high efficiency models with an Energy Star rating that use no more than 5 gallons per cycle. (vii) Interior plumbing equipped with hot water recirculation system, hot water demand type pump system or hot water thermo- siphon system. Exterior (i) Landscape designs that limit turf size (800 sf residential and 0 sf commercial) and promote use of adequately amended soil, drought - tolerant native and /or low - water use plants. TAGMISMA \Sonoma Marin SWMnew construction we measures Att A 022208.doc Last printed 212212008 (ii) Efficient irrigation system design that applies water to each hydro -zone separately with drip irrigation and /or matched precipitation sprinklers with a high degree of uniformity. (iii) Rain sensing devices that keep the irrigation controller from watering when it rains. (iv) Weather -based irrigation controllers. (v) Irrigation -only services agree to use recycled water should recycled water become available to that service. T:\GM \SCWA\Sonoma Marin SWPnew construction we measures Alt A 022208.doc Last printed 212212008 ATTACHMENT B TIER 2 WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES Measuxe" Taxg�1 Ct�� p$W s I�leasure i L }i j Shoxt Desexxpiao�q z „Vwnbe t5ke r Cate o tir 4 u Rain- sensor (shut Existing Customers off device) retrofit Agency pays for the rain sensor, T2 - 1 SF on irrigation homeowner pays for the optional controllers installation ($35). Provide a rebate for customers who remove irrigated turf grass and replace it with low water using T2 - 2 Existing Customers Cash for Grass (turf plants. The rebate would require SF, MF, CII removal program) that an appropriate irrigation system be installed for the replacement landscaping. Limited to :$500 rebate at $1.00 per square foot. For dedicated irrigation customers, All Dedicated Financial link a landscape water budget to a T2 - 3 Irrigation Meter Incentives for retail water agency's rate schedule customers Being Below Water so that the dedicated irrigation meter Budget customer pays less when their water use is at or under their water budget. Provide financial incentives /rebates for selected permits and equipment Existing CII to convert mixed use meters to a Customers with mixed Financial Rebates separate dedicated irrigation meter. T2 - 4 water use (indoor and for Irrigation Model implementation program outdoor) Meters after City of Santa Rosa's Service Split program. Utility will provide a water budget for the new irrigation meter. Provide an up to $450 rebate for the purchase of a SMART irrigation controller and associated signal fees Existing Customers Smart Irrigation (up to $150). Assume one controller T2 - 5 SF, MF, CII, IRR Controller Rebates for RSF and two for others. Minimum participant requirements: at least 500 sq ft of well maintained turf irrigated with an automatic irrigation control system. For MF & CII customers with Financial landscape, provide rebates for T2 - 6 Existing Customers Incentives/ Rebates selected types of irrigation MF, CII, IRR for Irrigation equipment upgrade including rain Upgrades sensors. Model program after water agencies such as EBMUD or Contra Costa Water District. Existing Customers: Hotel retrofit Following a free water audit, offer T2 - 7 CII (w /financial the hotel a rebate for equipment assistance) - CII identified that would save water. TAGMISCWA \Sonoma Marin SWPWttachmen[ B 022208.doc ATTACHMENT B TIER 2 WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES T: \GWSCWA \Sonoma Marin SWPWttachment 8 022208.doc Existing Provide a rebate schedule for certain efficient equipment such as air - cooled ice machines, steamers, washers, cooling towers, and spray rinse valves. Offer new accounts reduced connection Offer reduced water and sewer fees for installing connection fees to new facilities to efficient process install water efficient equipment in T2 - 8 New Customers: CII equipment for selected businesses new facilities that goes above and (restaurants, beyond the building code laundry mat, requirements. Model program after food/groceries and Santa Rosa's BAT program. hospital) Provide a rebate for replacing Existing Customers: Synthetic Turf existing turf with synthetic turf. T2 - 9 SF (North Marin only) Rebate Market program to all irrigation IRR customers and single family for North Marin only. Provide a rebate or voucher for the installation of a high efficiency toilet (HET). HET are defined as any T2 - 10 Existing Customers: High Efficiency toilet to flush 20% less than an SF & MF Toilet (HET) ULFT and include dual flush technology. Rebate amounts would reflect the incremental purchase cost. Provide a rebate to encourage homeowners to replace old Existing Customers: Dishwasher New inefficient dishwashers with new T2 - 11 SF Efficient efficient dishwashers (meeting certain water efficiency standards, such as gallons /load). Provide a rebate for a standard list of water efficient equipment. Included CH Rebates - would be x -ray machines, T2 - 12 Existing Customers: replace inefficient icemakers, air- cooled ice machines, CII water using steamers, washers, spray valves, equipment efficient dishwashers, replace once through cooling, add conductivity meters on cooling towers, etc. Require that new building be fitted T2 - 13 New Customers: CH 0.5 gal /flush urinals with 0.5 gpf urinals rather than the in new buildings current standard of 1.0- gal/flush models. T: \GWSCWA \Sonoma Marin SWPWttachment 8 022208.doc Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings held on the 2nd & 4 1 Tuesdays of each month: Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances & Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date Agenda Items w /attachments via email and hard copy to City Clerk DUE no later than NOON Two (2) Mondays prior to Council meeting date Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed /mailed on Wednesday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with Rohne.rt Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.050 {This section for City Clerk Use Only) RESO. NO. 2008-93 Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 8118/08 -TG Copy to: CITY OF ROHNERT PARK COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 Department: Administrative Services Submitted By: Sandy Lipitz, Director of Administrative Services (Name & Title) Submittal Date: June 10, 2008 Agenda (Subject Only) Title: Expenditure of Funds Prior to the Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 Municipal Budget Requested Council Action: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the Expenditure of Funds Prior to the Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 Municipal Budget Summary: The City of Rohnert Park's Budget for the Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 will not be approved before the end of this fiscal year. In order to continue the City's daily operations, the Council must adopt a resolution authorizing the expenditure of funds beyond the end of this fiscal year for usual and necessary expenditures including, but not limited to, expenditures for contract services previously authorized by the City Council. Enclosures: Resolution CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW: Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: (7TConsent Item ( ) Regular Time (?lpproval O Public Hearing Required ( ) Not Recommended () Submitted with Comment ( ) Policy Determination y Co nc' ( ) City Comments: City Manager's Signature: v Date: Cn d (Revise 010507 JV- S:05 -b RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS PRIOR TO THE ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2008 -2009 MUNICIPAL BUDGET WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park's Budget for the Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 has not been approved; WHEREAS, the City's daily operations require the expenditure of funds for usual and necessary expenditures including, but not limited to, expenditures for contract services previously authorized by the City Council; and WHEREAS, this resolution is intended to carry forward the prior fiscal year's appropriations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it does hereby authorize and approve expenditures of funds for usual and necessary expenditures, including those previously approved by the City Council prior to the 2008 -2009 Budget adoption. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2008. ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings held on the 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month: • Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances & Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date • Agenda Items w /attachments via email and hard copy to City Clerk DUE no later than NOON Two (2) Mondays prior to Council meeting date • Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date • Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted /distributed /mailed on Wednesday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.050 (This section for City Clerk Use Only) RESO. NO. 2008-94 Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6 118 /08 -TG Copy to: COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM. TRANSMITTAL REPORT Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 Department: Finance Submitted By: Cathy Orme, Accounting Manager Submittal Date: June 2, 2008 Agenda Title: Proposition 4 Appropriations Limit Fiscal Year 2008 -09 Requested Council Action: Approve Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the City of Rohnert Park for the 2008 -09 Fiscal Year Pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution Summary: By the passage of Proposition 4, Article XIII B was added to the Constitution of the State of California, which thereby limits state and local government spending. In general, the article limits annual appropriations of the City to the level of appropriations for the 1978 -79 base year, adjusted for changes in the cost of living, population, and other specified factors. Article XIIIB became effective the first day of the fiscal year following its adoption, i.e. July 1, 1980. For the City of Rohnert Park, the base year (1978 -79) calculations of appropriations subject to limitation are determined to be $4,218,884, which includes all funds. This amount was derived pursuant to a 1989 court decision (Santa Barbara County Taxpayers v. Board of Supervisors) where it was held that franchise fees do not fall within the definition of "proceeds of taxes ". This new base year appropriation limit is subsequently adjusted by the following: PRICE CHANGES 1. Changes in Cost of Living- Lesser of: a. CPI (revised May 198 1) b. State Per Capita Personal Income Change 1. Changes in Cost of Living- Lesser o£ a. CPI (revised May 198 1) b. State Per Capita Personal Income Change 1978 -79 1979 -80 1980 -81 1981 -82 10.17% 14.68% - - -- 6.79% 12.42% 12.11% 9.12% - - -- 1982 -83 1983 -84 1984 -85 1985 -86 - - -- 4.74% 3.74% 2.13% 2.35% - - -- - - -- - --- 1. Changes in Cost of Living- Lesser of: a. CPI (revised May 1981 b. State Per Capita Personal Income Change 1. Changes in Cost of Living- Lesser of: a. Personal Income Change b. Inc. in non - residential assess. val. due to new construction 1. Changes in Cost of Living- Lesser of: a. Personal Income Change b. Inc. in non - residential assess. val. due to new construction 1. Changes in Cost of Living- Lesser of: a. Personal Income Change b. Inc. in non - residential assess. val. due to new construction 1. Changes in Cost of Living - Lesser of: a. Personal Income Change b. Inc. in non - residential assess. val. due to new construction POPULATION CHANGES 2. Changes in Population (Per State Dept. of Finance) 2. Changes in Population (Per State Dept. of Finance) 2. Changes in Population (Per State Dept. of Finance) 1986 -87 1987 -88 1988 -89 1989 -90 3.04% 3.93% 4.98% 4.21% - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- 1990-91 1991 -92 1992 -93 1993 -94 1994 -95 4.14% (0.64)% 2.72% 0.71% 4.72% - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- 1995-96 1997 -98 1998 -99 1999 -00 2000 -01 4.67% 4.67% 4.15% 4.53% 4.91% - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- 2001-02 2002 -03 2003 -04 2004 -05 2005 -06 7.82% -1.27% 2.31% 3.28% 5.26% 2006 -07 2007 -2008 2008 -2009 3.96% 4.42% 4.29% 1978 -79 1979 -80 1980 -81 1981 -82 11.08% 10.88% 6.70% 5.08% 1982 -83 1983 -84 1984 -85 1985 -86 2.93% 4.17% 4.18% 5.32% 1986 -87 1987 -88 1988 -89 1989 -90 5.84% 1.95% 3.31% 5.33% (County) (City) 1990 -91 1991 -92 1992 -93 1993 -94 1994 -95 2. Changes in Population (Per State Dept. of Finance) 3.11% 3.18% 2.43% 1.99% 2.22% (County) (City) (County) (County) (County) 1995 -96 1997 -98 1998 -99 1999 -00 2000 -01 2. Changes in Population (Per State Dept. of Finance) 1.48% 1.20 1.98 1.62 1.39 (City) (County) (County) (County) (County) 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 2004 -05 2005 -06 2. Changes in Population (Per State Dept. of Finance) 1.52 % 1.46% 0.89% 0.88% 0.74% (County) (County) (City) (County) (County) 2006 -07 2007 -2008 2008 -2009 2. Changes in Population (Per State Dept. of Finance) 1.53% .75% .95% (City) (County) (County) The approved appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2007 -08 was $37,297,477. To calculate the new appropriation limit for the fiscal year 2008 -09, you need to apply the 4.29% increase in the California Per Capita Income and the..95% change in population (for the County this year) to the 2007 -08 limit. Therefore, the adjustment to the 2008 -09 appropriation limit represents a 5.24% increase. The "appropriations subject to limitation" for the fiscal year 2008 -09 is calculated to be $39,267,066. Article XIII B of the California Constitution lacks specific procedures for the annual adoption of the appropriation limit. However, SB 1352 (Marks) adds Government code section 7910 which requires the City to establish its appropriation limit by resolution each year at a regularly scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting. The law does not provide for a specific calendar date for the adoption of the resolution. Attached to this transmittal report is the resolution to be adopted at the June 24, 2008, City Council meeting. In this resolution, the appropriation limit of $39,267,066 has been calculated. All supporting documentation used in the calculation of the appropriation limit for the fiscal year 2008 -09 is also attached for your review, and has been available for public inspection since June 2, 2008. The appropriation limits only apply to appropriations financed from the "proceeds of taxes" which the initiative defines as: 1. All tax revenues (excluding Gas Tax and Transportation Development Act Funds); and 2. Any proceeds from the investment of tax revenues; and 3. Any revenues from a regulatory license fee, user charge or user fee that exceeds the amount needed to cover the reasonable cost of providing the regulation, product or service. The initiative would not restrict the growth in appropriations financed from other sources of revenues, including federal funds, bond funds, traffic fines, user fees based on reasonable costs and other gift incomes. The appropriation limit may be changed by one of the following ways: The voters may temporarily vote to change the appropriations limit. The change may not exceed four years unless the voters renew the change. Also, it takes a majority vote for the approval. 2. In the event of an emergency, the appropriation limit may be exceeded for one year. If the appropriation limit is exceeded due to an emergency, the limit in the following three years would be reduced by an amount sufficient to recoup the excess appropriation. 3. If the financial responsibility for providing a program or Service is transferred from the City from another governmental entity, the appropriation limit of both jurisdictions may be adjusted by a reasonable amount that is mutually agreed upon. Any increase in one entity's limit would have to be offset by an equal decrease in the other entity's limit. 4. If the City transfers the financial responsibility for providing a program or service to a private entity, or a source of funds used to support an existing program or service is shifted from "proceeds of taxes" to a regulatory license fee, or user fee, the City's appropriation limit must be reduced accordingly. If, in any fiscal year, the City were to receive or have in excess of the amount that it appropriates for that year, it would be required to return the excess to taxpayers within the next two fiscal years. The initiative specifies that these funds are to be returned by lowering tax rates or fee schedules. The "proceeds of taxes ", for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009 for the City of Rohnert Park, is estimated to be $15,768,000 which is well below the appropriations subject to limitation ($39,267,066) for the same year. This gap between the "proceeds of taxes" and the appropriation subject to limitations assures the City of not being put into a posture of returning tax monies to the taxpayers or having to initiate other procedures as outlined above. It is projected that the City of Rohnert. Park will be able to grow and provide services without an immediate concern of reaching its appropriation limit. If you have any questions on the attached worksheets and /or documentation used in the calculations or would like to discuss Proposition 4 in general, its effect long or short term, please let me know. Enclosures: Resolution — Prop 4 Public Notice Prop 4 Affidavit of Posting CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW: Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: Wconsent Item ( ) Regular Time Approval () Public Hearing Required ( ) Not Recommended () Submitted with Comment ( ) Policy Determination by Council ( ) City Comments: City Manager's Signature: Date: h [ 3 (Revised 10507) H:T -5:05 -b CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Proposition 4 Appropriation Limit Fiscal Year 2008 -09 Base Year (1978 -79) Appropriations $4,218,884 Subject to Limit Change in Cost of Living (1978 -79) CPI Revised 10.17 1.1017 State Per Capita Income 12.42 -------- - - - - -- $4,647,945 Change in Population (1978 -79) Per State Dept. of Finance 11.08 1.1108 Appropriation Limit 1979 -80 Revised $5,162,937 Change in Cost of Living (1979 -80) CPI 14.68 State Per Capita Income 12.11 1.1211 $5,788,169 Change in Population (1979 -80) Per State Dept. of Fin. (Rev) 10.88 1.1088 Appropriation Limit 1980 -81 Revised $6,417,922' Change in Cost of Living (1980 -81) CPI --- State Per Capita Income 9.12 1.0912 ----- --- - - - --- $7,003,236 Change in Population (1980 -81) Per State Dept. of Finance 6.70 1.0670 Appropriation Limit 1981 -82 $7,472,453 " Change in Cost of Living (1981 -82) CPI 6.79 1.0679 ---- -------- -- $7,979,833 Change in Population (1981 -82) Per State Dept. of Finance 5.08 1.0508 Appropriation Limit 1982 -83 $8,385,209 Change in Cost of Living (1982 -83) State Per Capita Income 2.35 1.0235 ----- --- - - - - -- $8,582,261 Change in Population (1982 -83) Per State Dept. of Finance 2.93 1.0293 -------- --- --- Appropriation Limit 1983 -84 $8,833,721 ' Change in Cost of Living (1983 -84) CPI 4.74 1.0474 - - -- -- -- ------ $9,252,439 Change in Population (1983 -84) Per State Dept. of Finance 4.17 1.0417 Appropriation Limit 1984 -85 $9,638,266 M:\P.gendas - City Council Agenda - Items\2008 M24 -08 \Prop 4 Appropriafion Umid- OM9.zls CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Proposition 4 Appropriation Limit Fiscal Year 2008 -09 Change in Cost of Living (1984 -85) CPI 3.74 1.0374 -------- - - -- -- $9,998,737 Change in Population (1984 -85) Per State Dept. of Finance 4.18 1.0418 Appropriation Limit 1985 -86 ----- ---- - -- -- $10,416,684 Change in Cost of Living (1985 -86) CPI 2.13 1.0213 - ------- - - - - -- $10,638,559 Change in Population (1985 -86) Per State Dept. of Finance 5.32 1.0532 Appropriation Limit 1986 -87 --- ----- - - - - -- $11,204,530 Change in Cost of Living (1986 -87) CPI 3.04 1.0304 ---- ---- - - - - -- $11,545,148 Change in Population (1986 -87) Per State Dept. of Finance 5.84 1.0584 Appropriation Limit 1987 -88 - ----- -- - -- - -- $12,219,385 Change in Cost of Living (1987 -88) CPI 3.93 1.0393 ---- ---- - - - - -- $12,699,607 Change in Population (1987 -88) Per State Dept. of Finance 3.33 1.0333 Appropriation Limit 1988 -89 ---- -- -- - -- - -- $13,122,503' Change in Cost of Living (1988 -89) CPI 4.98 1.0498 -------- - - - - -- $13,776,004 Change in Population (1988 -89) Per State Dept. of Finance 3.31 1.0331 Appropriation Limit 1989 -90 - ------- --- - -- $14,231,990 Change in Cost of Living (1989 -90) CPI 4.21 1.0421 --- ---- -- ----- $14,831,157 Change in Population (1989 -90) Per State Dept. of Finance 5.33 1.0533 Appropriation Limit 1990 -91 $15,621,657 M.\Agendas - City Cound!\Agenda - Items12008106 -24 -08 \Prop 4 Appropriation Limit- 08- 09.xls CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Proposition 4 Appropriation Limit Fiscal Year 2008 -09 Change in Cost of Living (1990 -91) CPT 4.14 1.0414 -------- - ----- $16,268,394 Change in Population (1990 -91) Per State Dept. of Finance 3.11 1.0311 (used County change) - ------- - ----- Appropriation Limit 1991 -92 $16,774,341 Change in Cost of Living (1991 -92) Per Capita Income -0.64 0.9936 $16,666,985 Change in Population (1991 -92) Per State Dept. of Finance 3.18 1.0318 (used City change) --- ------ - - - -- Appropriation Limit 1992 -93 $17,196,995 Change in Cost of Living (1992 -93) Per Capita Income 2.72 1.0272 ---- ---- - - -- -- $17,664,754 Change in Population (1992 -93) Per State Dept. of Finance 2.43 1.0243 (used County change) -------- - - - --- Appropriation Limit 1993 -94 $18,094,007 Change in Cost of Living (1993 -94) Per Capita Income 0.71 1.0071 -------- --- --- $18,222,474 Change in Population (1993 -94) Per State Dept. of Finance 1.99 1.0199 (used County change) -------- -- - --- Appropriation Limit 1994 -95 $18,585,102' Change in Cost of Living (1994 -95) Per Capita Income 4.72 1.0472 ------- - ------ $19,462,319 Change in Population (1994 -95) Per State Dept. of Finance 2.22 1.0222 ** (used County change) -- -- -- --- -- - -- Appropriation Limit 1995 -96 $19,894,382 `- Change in Cost of Living (1995 -96) Per Capita Income 4.67 1.0467 - ------- - - - - -- $20,823,450 Change in Population (1995 -96) Per State Dept. of Finance 1.48 1.0148 ** (used City change) - -- ---- -- - - - -- Appropriation Limit 1996 -97 $21,131,637 M:\Agendas - City CounciMgenda - Items\2008 \06 -24 -08 \Prop 4 Appropdation Limit- 08- 09.xls CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Proposition 4 Appropriation Limit Fiscal Year 2008 -09 Change in Cost of Living (1996 -97) Per Capita Income 4.67 1.0467 -------- - -- - -- $22,118,484 Change in Population (1996 -97) Per State Dept. of Finance 1.2 1.012 ** (used County change) -------- - - - - -- Appropriation Limit 1997 -98 $22,383,906= Change in Cost of Living (1997 -98) Per Capita Income 4.15 1.0415 $23,312,838 Change in Population (1997 -98) Per State Dept. of Finance 1.98 1.0198 ** (used County change) -------- - - - - -- Appropriation Limit 1998 -99 $23,774,432 Change in Cost of Living (1998 -99) Per Capita Income 4.53 1.0453 ---- ---- --- --- $24,851,414 Change in Population (1998 -99) Per State Dept. of Finance 1.62 1.0162 (used County change) -------- - - - - -- Appropriation Limit 1999 -00 $25;254,007 Change in Cost of Living (1999 -00) Per Capita Income 4.91 1.0491 $26,493,979 Change in Population (1999 -00) Per State Dept. of Finance 1.39 1.0139 (used County change) -------- - - - - -- Appropriation Limit 2000 -01 $26,862,245 Change in Cost of Living (2000 -01) Per Capita Income 7.82 1.0782 - -- ----- -- - --- $28,962,873 Change in Population (2000 -01) Per State Dept. of Finance 1.52 1.0152 (used County change) -------- - - - - -- Appropriation Limit 2001 -02 $29,403,108 WAgendas - City CounciNAgenda - ItemsU008\08.24- 08Trop 4 Appropriation Limit- 08- 09.xis CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Proposition 4 Appropriation Limit Fiscal Year 2008 -09 Change in Cost of Living (2001 -02) Per Capita Income Change in Population (2001 -02) Per State Dept. of Finance (used County change) Appropriation Limit 2002 -03 Change in Cost of Living (2002 -03) Per Capita Income Change in Population (2002 -03) Per State Dept. of Finance (used County change) Appropriation Limit 2003 -04 Change in Cost of Living (2003 -04) Per Capita Income Change in Population (2003 -04) Per State Dept. of Finance (used County change) Appropriation Limit 2004 -05 Change in Cost of Living (2004 -05) Per Capita Income Change in Population (2004 -05) Per State Dept. of Finance (used County change) Appropriation Limit 2005 -06 Change in Cost of Living (2005 -06) Per Capita Income Change in Population (2005 -06) Per State Dept. of Finance (used City change) Appropriation Limit 2006 -07 -1.27 0.9873 - ------ - -- - - -- $29,029,689 1.46 1.0146 $29,453,522` 2.31 1.0231 -------- - ----- $30,133,899 0.89 1.0089 $30,402,090 3.28 1.0328 --- ----- - -- - -- $31,399,279 0.88 1.0088 $31,675,592 5.26 1.0526 $33,341,729 0.74 1.0074 $33,588,457 3.96 1.0396 - ------- - -- --- $34,918,560 1.53 1.0153 ------- - - - ---- $35,452,814 MAgendas - City CouncillAgenda - Items\2008 100 -24 -08 \Prop 4 Approprialion Limil- 08- 09.xls CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Proposition 4 Appropriation Limit Fiscal Year 2008 -09 Change in Cost of Living (2006 -07) Per Capita Income Change in Population (2006 -07) Per State Dept. of Finance (used County change) Appropriation Limit 2007 -08 Change in Cost of Living (2007 -08) Per Capita Income Change in Population (2007 -08) Per State Dept. of Finance (used County change) Appropriation Limit 2008 -09 * Base year appropriation limit was recalculated because of the 1989 court decision (Santa Barbara County Taxpayers v. Board of Supervisors) which held that franchise fees do not fall within the definition of "proceeds of taxes" and hence such fees need not be included as funds subject to the Gann limit. Each years' appropriation limit is affected by this change. ** Method of calculation of limit changed effective 1/1/91. Now, population change is either the City's or the County's, whichever is higher. City has the option to go back to 1986 -87. This year the County population change was used in the calculation. WYA 1.0442 $37,019,829 0.75 1.0075 --- --- -- --- - -- $37,297,47 4.29 1.0429 $38,897,539 0.95 1.0095 ------- - ---- -- $39,267,066 WAgendas - City CounciMgenda - Items\2008 \06- 24- 0MProp 4 Appropriation Limit- 08- 09.xis RESOLUTION NO. 2008-94 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK FOR THE 2008 -09 FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the California Constitution (Proposition 4) provides for an annual appropriations limit for state and local governments beginning with the 1980 -81 fiscal year, based on the 1978 -79 appropriations, as adjusted for the changes in the cost of living or per capita personal income, population, and other specified factors; and WHEREAS, implementing legislation, which became effective January 1, 1981, provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the year pursuant to Article III B at a regularly scheduled meeting or noticed special meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Rohnert Park that: 1. For fiscal year 2008 -09, the City of Rohnert Park hereby (a) elects the change in the California Per Capita Income for calculating the inflation factor, and (b) elects the change in the City's population for calculating the population factor, necessary to determine the City's appropriation limit. 2. For fiscal year 2008 -09, the total annual appropriations subject to limitation are $15,768,000 and the appropriations limit is $39,267,066. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2008 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST Deputy City Clerk CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 6750 Commerce Boulevard Rohnert Park, California 94928 Telephone (707) 588 -2226 PUBLIC NOTICE Appropriation Limit for the City of Rohnert Park for the 2008 -09 Fiscal Year Pursuant to Article III B of the California Constitution NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Rohnert Park has calculated its annual appropriation limit for the 2008 -09 fiscal year, based on 1978 -79 appropriations, as adjusted for changes in the cost of living or per capita income, population and other specific factors for the subsequent years of 1979 -80 through 2007 -08. The appropriations limit for the City of Rohnert Park for the fiscal year 2007 -08 is calculated to be $39,267,066. Documentation used in the calculation of the appropriations limit is available for public inspection Monday through Friday at the City's Finance Office, 6800 Hunter Drive, Suite B, Rohnert Park, CA 94928, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Cathy Orme Accounting Manager Dated: June 2, 2008 Prop 4 Public Notice June 2 2008.doc AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) .ss COUNTY OF SONOMA ) Cathy Orme, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is, and during all times herein mentioned was, the duly acting and qualified Accounting Manager of the City of Rohnert Park, Sonoma County, California; and that on the 2nd day of June, 2008'she posted full, true and correct copies of Public Notice - Appropriations Limit for the City of Rohnert Park for the 2008 -09 Fiscal Year Pursuant to Article III B of the California Constitution in three public places in said city, to wit: City Offices, 6750 Commerce Boulevard City Offices Annex, 6800 Hunter Drive Suite B Rohnert Park Community Center 5401 Snyder Lane . Subscribed and sworn to before me this RONNERr 444-' day of June, 2008. Clerk IJFORNIp Prop 4 Affidavit of Posting June 2008 Cathy Orme Accounting Manager Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings held on the 2"d & 4`h Tuesdays of each month: Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances & Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date Agenda Items w /attachments via email and hard copy to City Clerk DUE no later than NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted /distributed /mailed on Wednesday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.050 Meeting Date: Department: Submitted By: (Name & Title) Submittal Date: (This section for City Clerk Use Only) RESO. NO. 2008-95 Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6118108 -TG Copy to: CITY OF ROHNERT PARK COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Agenda (Subject Only) Title June 24, 2008 Public Works Darrin Jenkins PE, City Engineer /Public Works Director June 13, 2008 Resolution Recognizing Michael Bracewell Requested Council Action: Approve attached resolution. Michael Bracewell was hired in July 1999. In mid 2003, Mike was promoted to Public Works Supervisor along with Brad Rosaschi. Together they supervised 36 to 40 employees in Public Works operations. In September 2007, Brad retired leaving Mike alone to manage Public Works operations. At that time, Mike volunteered to serve as Interim Public Works Manager until the city could recruit a permanent Public Works Manager. Mike and his staff have accomplished numerous things during his tenure as Interim Public Works Manager. In July, a permanent Public Works Manager will start and Mike will take on a new role in Public Works. The attached resolution recognizes and thanks Mike for his dedication in the role of Interim Public Works Manager. Enclosures: Michael Bracewell's Public Works Accomplishments 2007/08; Resolution CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW: Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: - Consent Item ( ) Regular Time 4-C) Approval () Public Hearing Required ( ) Not Recommended ( Submitted with Comment ( ) Policy Determination by Co nc' ( ) City Comments: City Manager's Signature: Date: ` (Revised 10507) H:TG- S:OS -b Michael Bracewell's Public Works Accomplishments 2007/2008 Between October 2007 and June 2008 Mike accomplished the following: • Implemented an interim organizational plan when Brad Rosaschi retired • Volunteered to be the interim Public Works Manager • Proved himself to be a dedicated & loyal employee by putting the City's needs ahead of his own • Led by example and expected others to do the same • Implemented a Public Works Department work order system • Completed all Public Works budgets which included a 10% reduction in expenses for FY2008/09 • Managed Public Works employees through the January 2008 storms • Provided support for training and certifications obtained by employees • Maintained excellent working relationships with all city departments • Rotated utility employees to learn sewer operations and to obtain Commercial Class B licenses • Provided 24/7 availability for questions and emergencies • Held employees accountable for their actions • Significantly reduced sickness absence abuse. • Promoted and created a teamwork environment within department • Implemented the use of green cleaning products in Public Works • Obtained well rehabilitation energy rebates and improved electrical efficiency • Coordinated the Water Control System and Booster Pump projects • Hired contractor to reduce sidewalk trip hazards • Streamlined daily graffiti reporting procedures to Public Safety • Assisted with the Eastside Trunk Sewer Project • Implemented 9/80 work schedule • Became a Wine Country Water Works Association Board member In addition, under Mike's direction and leadership, the Public Works staff accomplished the following: • Had no lost time Public Works Department accidents or injuries for 343 consecutive days • Recycled street signs by having them refurbished • Painted all well hydropneumatic tanks and well site buildings • Installed new ladders and railings at water tanks 3 & 4 • Purchased a new leak truck, 2 utility trucks, stump grinder, welder, and jack hammer air compressor • Replaced failing automobile shop, welding room, and wood shop roll up doors • Painted interior Public Works front offices & break room • Implemented Rotary Club low water use landscape project (Country Club Drive north) • Assisted in the traffic control coordination and provided staff for the Rancho Cotate High School homecoming parade • Made Senior Center parking lot access improvements • Installed automatic restroom locks at Magnolia and Alicia Parks to decrease vandalism • Painted several restrooms and buildings in parks (standardized the color for quick graffiti abatement) • Organized warehouse, shop, welding room, and corporation yard • Hazmat area clean up, disposal, and record keeping • Relocated approximately 30 geese that resided at Roberts Lake • Resolved 1 VAC problem issues and in Public. Safety Main Station • Installed 2 new basketball hoops and poles at Dorotea Park • Repaired creek and flood channel bridges N Resolution No. 2008 -95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Recognizing and Honoring MICHAEL BRACEWELL For His Dedicated Service as Interim Public Works Manager WHEREAS, Michael Bracewell served in the role of Interim Public Works Manager from October 2007 to June 2008; WHEREAS, Mike is dedicated to the improvement of the City of Rohnert Park and works tirelessly on the city's behalf, often sacrificing his personal time in the process; WHEREAS, Mike is described by co- workers as friendly, caring, funny, hard working, dedicated, and enthusiastic; WHEREAS, the City has received numerous calls from the public reporting how quickly and efficiently Mike has taken care of their concerns; WHEREAS, a small sampling of Mike's accomplishments includes: leading by example, providing 24/7 availability for questions and emergencies, setting a record for no accidents or injuries among Public Works employees for 343 consecutive days, upgrading the automobile mechanics shop, implementing a work order system, holding employees accountable for their actions, reducing employee absence abuse, implementing use of green - cleaning products, streamlining graffiti reporting and cleanup, and implementing the Public Works 9/80 work schedule; and WHEREAS, the remainder of his accomplishments over the last nine months are literally too long to list. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it recognizes Michael Bracewell for a job well done as Interim Public Works Manager. We further salute him for his ability to interface in diverse situations with the public, professionals, employees, and insurance companies. DULYAND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 24`" day of June, 2008. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings held on the 2nd & 4`h Tuesdays of each month: • Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances & Agreements to Assistant City Attorney and Assistant City Manager via email to review for "approvals as to form" and agenda planning DUE no later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting dates • Agenda Items with related attachments via email to City Clerk DUE no later than NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting dates • Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later than Tuesday mornings One (1) week prior to Council meeting dates • Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed /mailed on Wednesday afternoons One (1) week prior to Council meeting dates for compliance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.050 {This section for City Clerk Use Only) ITEM NO. 5 ORD. NO. 799 (ADOPTION) Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6118108 -TG Copy to: CITY OF ROHNERT PARK COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 Department: Community Development Submitted By: Maureen Rich, Senior Planner Submittal Date: June 11, 2008 Agenda Title: Second Reading of Ordinance 799 "Amending the Official Zoning Map and Adopting a Final Development Plan (Stadium Area Master Plan) for property located at 5900 Labath Avenue (APNs: 143 -040 -116 and -117 part) File No.: PL2004 -063 RZ (Final Development Plan)." Requested Council Action: Adopt Ordinance 799 to Rezone 29.8 to a "P -D" zoning district to allow the development of the Stadium Area Master Plan - Final Development Plan. Summary: On June 10, 2008 the City Council considered the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) certification, General Plan Amendments and Rezoning for the project known as Stadium Area Master Plan. The Council voted 5 -0 to certify the EIR, 4 -1 to approve the General Plan Amendments and 4 -1 to approve the Rezoning. While the decisions on the EIR certification and General Plan Amendments are final on the date of action, by law, the Ordinance adopting the Rezoning requires a second reading. Attachments Location Map Ordinance 799 CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW: Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item (X) Regular Time (X) Approval () Public Hearing Required ( ) Not Recommended () Submitted with Comment ( ) Policy Determination by Council ( ) City Comments: City Manager's Signature: Date: i evise 06 ) JH- S:05 -b ORDINANCE NO. 799 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND ADOPTING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (STADIUM AREA MASTER PLAN) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5900 LABATH AVENUE; APN's 143 - 040 -116 AND - 117(part) FILE NO. PL2004 -063RZ and PL2004 -063PD (Redwood Equities, LLC) WHEREAS, the applicant, Redwood Equities, submitted an application for the Rezoning of a 29.8 acre site located generally on the north side of Hinebaugh Creek, east of Labath Avenue, west of Costco, and south of Business Park Drive APN's 143 -040 -116 and -117 (part); WHEREAS, pursuant to California State Law and the Rohnert Park Municipal Code, public hearing notices were mailed to all property owners within an area exceeding a 300 foot radius of the subject property, public hearing notice signs were posted on the property, and a public hearing was published for a minimum of 10 days prior to the first public hearing in the Press Democrat; WHEREAS, on June 10, 2008, the Council of the City of Rohnert Park held a public hearing at which time interested persons had an opportunity to provide public testimony either in support of or opposition to the proposal; WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Rohnert Park reviewed and certified the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project; and has otherwise carried out all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DOES RESOLVE, FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. The Council of the City of Rohnert Park in approving the application for rezoning PL2004 -063RZ (Rezoning) and PL2004 -063PD (Final Development Plan), makes the following findings in accordance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 17.25.073: Rezone PL2004 -063RZ 1. That the proposed Rezoning is consistent with the General Plan. Criteria Satisfied. That the General Plan designations over the site as amended for the purpose of creating new housing with a park and regional commercial development will provide consistency as required by law. 2. That the proposed Rezoning will be beneficial to and not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Criteria Satisfied. The Rezoning as depicted will allow the Stadium Area Master Plan to be implemented to meet the goals of the General Plan concerning this property. The ultimate development of the site will benefit the City by providing additional residential and commercial development in a pedestrian - friendly setting. That with the proposed Rezoning, adequate and available sites remain to mitigate the loss of any residential density on the subject property to accommodate the City's "Fair Share " regional housing needs used by the State Department of Housing and Development in determining compliance with Housing Element Law pursuant to Government Code Section 65863(b). Page 1 of 3 Stadium Area Master Plan APN's 143 - 040 -116 and -117 (part) File No.: PL2004 -063 Rezoning S FAM t io �o Stadium Area Master Plan APN's 143 - 040 -116 and -117 (part) File No.: PL2004 -063 Rezoning S FAM t io Criteria Satisfied. The Rezoning will provide for future residential development on the site and will assist the City in meeting the Quantified Objectives listed in the City's Housing Element of the General Plan. 4. That a duly noticed public hearing has been held to receive and consider public testimony regarding the proposed Rezoning. Criteria Satisfied. The Public Hearing was properly noticed in the local newspaper, by mail and two signs were physically erected on the site. Final Development Plan PL2004 -063PD 1. Each individual component of the development can exist as an independent unit capable of creating an environment of sustained desirability and stability, and the uses proposed will not be detrimental to present andpotential surrounding uses but instead will have a beneficial effect which could not be achieved under another zoning district; Criteria Satisfied. Future development will be guided by the Stadium Area Master Plan dated February 6, 2008. Each component of future development will be designed as independent units. Land uses will be consistent with the Stadium Area Master Plan and will not be detrimental to present and /or potential surrounding uses. 2. The streets and thoroughfares proposed meet the standards of the city and adequate infrastructure can be supplied to all phases of the development; Criteria Satisfied. The Stadium Area Master Plan, dated February 6, 2008, identifies the design of each street and thoroughfare to meet the City of Rohnert Park's street design standards. Infrastructure phasing will be addressed upon request for entitlement for the first project. 3. Any commercial component complements other uses in the development; Criteria Satisfied. The Stadium Area Master Plan, dated February 6, 2008, indicates that commercial development will be located on the southern portion of the site, approximately 15 acres in size. Commercial development in this area is a continuation of existing Regional Commercial development (e.g., Costco and Ashley Furniture). 4. Any residential component will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and community and will result in densities within the P -D district that are no higher than that permitted by the general plan; Criteria Satisfied. The Stadium Area Master Plan, dated February 6, 2008, indicates that high density residential development will be located on the northern portion of the site, approximately 13 acres in size. While no design has been submitted for review, future proposals will meet the City's density requirements and design standards. 5. Any deviation from the standard zoning requirements is warranted by the design and additional amenities incorporated in the final development plan, which offer certain unusual redeeming features to compensate for any deviations that may be permitted; Criteria Satisfied. The Stadium Area Master Plan, dated February 6, 2008, would potentially permit deviates in the parking standards. However, future developments will be required to perform detailed parking analyses to warrant any reduction. 6. The P -D zoning district is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rohnert Park. Criteria Satisfied. The Stadium Area Master Plan, dated February 6, 2008, is consistent with the General Plan designations that are proposed for the area and would generate additional new housing with park/open space and a regional commercial. Page 2 of 3 Section 3. Environmental Clearance. The Council of the City of Rohnert Park has reviewed and certified the Final EIR and has directed staff to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. Section 4: Severability. The City Council hereby declares that every section, paragraph, sentence. Clause and phrase is severable. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this article is for any reason found to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity, or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases. Section 5: Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effective 30 days after its adoption, and shall be published and posted as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Rohnert Park does hereby approve Application Nos. PL2004 -063RZ and PL2004 -063PD which Rezones 29.8 acres of property located at 5900 Labath Avenue and further described as APN's 143 -040 -116 and -117 (part), to the "P -D" Zoning District and adopts the Stadium Area Master Plan as the Final Development Plan. This ordinance was introduced by the Council of the City of Rohnert Park on the 10th day of June, 2008, and DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this day of , 2008 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor Page 3 of 3 Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings held on the 2 ❑d & 4th Tuesdays of each month: • Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances & Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date • Agenda Items w /attachments via email and hard copy approved by City Manager to City Clerk DUE no later than NOON Two (2) Fridays prior to Council meeting date • Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date • Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed /mailed on Wednesday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.050 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK {This section for City Clerk Use Only) ITEM NO.6 RESO. NO. 2008-96 Council: X Miscellaneous _ Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6/20/08 -TG Copy to: COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 Department: Engineering Submitted By: Eydie Tacata, Management Analyst (Name & Title) Submittal Date: June 20, 2008 Agenda Title: Consideration of Adoption of the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for 2008 -2013 Requested Council Action: Adopt the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for 2008 -2013 Summary: Every year, the City updates its Five -Year Capital Improvements Program (CIP), which includes a capital project budget for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as projects slated for design and construction over the next 5 years. This updated CIP for the period from FY 2008 -09 through FY 2012 -13 includes forty -nine (49) projects, totaling over $137 million over five years. During the fiscal year 2008 -09, the proposed capital projects budget will total almost $22 million for twenty -one (2 1) projects in various stages of preconstruction (acquisition, environmental, design, and engineering) or construction. The 21 projects include: • 7 projects that are partially- or fully- funded through the Public Facilities Finance Plan, Redevelopment Tax Allocation Bond proceeds, or some combination thereof, with additional funding sources where needed, including grant funding or existing user share through utility rates • 3 utilities preservation projects funded through water or sewer rates • 11 projects (2 parks and recreation, 5 transportation - related, 1 drainage, 2 water, 1 energy - efficiency) fully - funded through grants, Federal or State funding, proceeds from voter- approved tax initiatives or direct reimbursement from developers. The Planning Commission reviewed the CIP on June 12, 2008 found it to be consistent with the General Plan. As these projects all have identified funding, staff recommends that the Council adopt the Five - Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for 2008 -2013. CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW: Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ( ) Consent Item ><Regular Time Approval () Public Hearing Required ( ) Not Recommended O Submitted with Comment ( ) Policy Determination by Council rity ) City Comments: Manager's Signature: Date: (Revised 01 07) JH:TG- S.05 -b RESOLUTION NO. 2008-96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ADOPTING THE FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 -09 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2012 -13 WHEREAS, the City's Capital Improvement Program Committee, made up of various City departments, has assembled a slate of proposed capital improvement projects and associated costs covering the period between Fiscal Year 2008 -09 and Fiscal Year 2012 -13; WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park's General Plan 2000 requires that a Capital Improvement Program be in place as a planning and budgeting tool for the improvement of City facilities and infrastructure, to be reviewed and updated annually; WHEREAS, this project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to the California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15306 (Class 6 — Information Collection); WHEREAS, City Staff and the Rohnert Park Planning Commission have reviewed the Capital Improvement Program and recommend its adoption; WHEREAS, on June 24, 2008, the City Council reviewed and discussed Capital Improvement Program for FY 2008 -09 through FY 2012 -13. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rohnert Park, does hereby authorize and adopt the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for FY 2008 -09 through FY 2012 -13. DULY AND REGULARY ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2008. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF ROHNERT PARK FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2008 -09 THROUGH 2012 -13 Introduction The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) provides a multi -year list of proposed major capital expenditures and associated operating costs for the City. It provides the means for evaluating facility and infrastructure projects and capital equipment needs. This plan, covering a period of five years, attempts to set funding strategies not only for the current year, but also to project future needs for major construction and public facilities that benefit the citizens of Rohnert Park. This year's Capital Improvement Program will accomplish the following projects next year to address rehabilitation, preventative maintenance, and in some cases, enhancement, of our existing facilities: 1. Realizing the vision of building a downtown for Rohnert Park by the development of the City. Center Plaza, City Center Drive Improvements, and pursuing retail /restaurant development opportunities, 2. New LEED Gold certified City Hall, 3. Road Overlays /Pavement Improvement Program, 4. Commerce, State Farm, and Southwest Blvd. Corridor Plans, 5. Community Center Master Plan— Community Center improvements, and 6. Significant improvements to the reliability and delivery of our water and sewer systems. Why Prepare a Capital Improvement Program? The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) provides the following organizational benefits: 1. Establishes a platform for independent, critical evaluation of each project on its own merits. 2. Develops a plan that balances public facility needs and the city's financial condition on both a short and long term basis. 3. Serves as a communications tool to the public, other governmental units, and the business community detailing the location and timing of improvements. 4. Assists in maintaining a balance between debt service and current expenditures. 5. Maximizes state and federal aid. 6. Provides greater opportunity to fund larger projects. 7. Improves intergovernmental and regional cooperation. GENERAL GUIDELINES What is a Capital Improvement Project? The following definition is used to describe a Capital Improvement (CIP) Project: Any project that meets at 'least one of the fo "owing criteria, and that is deemed a CIP Project (based on this criteria) by the city's Capital Improvement Program Committee (CIP Committee): a. The project is $50,000 or greater in cost. b. The project has a life span of at least 10 years. C. The project is unique in nature and is not a recurring budget expenditure. d. The project is a fixed asset (may include. activities /components that result in a fixed asset, such as training, preliminary studies, software, acquisition, etc.). How are projects developed and evaluated? The City Council has established five goals over the past several years: 1. Raise Revenues 2. Infrastructure — Maintain/Increase 3. Increase Safety — "Safest City on 101" 4. Sustainability 5. Partnership /Cooperation Staff formed a CIP Committee to establish a list of capital projects and evaluate them based on the City Council's established budget goals. This Committee consisted of a representative of those operating departments most involved with the creation and execution of capital projects, such as Public Works, Engineering, Recreation, Performing Arts, City Manager's Office, Public Safety and Finance. The CIP Committee also has the responsibility of monitoring the Program with periodic reviews and provides updates to the City Manager. One member of the Committee serves as coordinator, and is responsible for calling and facilitating meetings, as well as facilitating the creation of Committee reports to the City Manager. What are the categories for the projects? The Committee developed the following project categories for the CIP Program: ♦ City Facilities ♦ Parks and Recreation ♦ Technology ♦ Transportation ♦ Water Systems ♦ Wastewater Systems What is the process? The CIP Committee will drive the following steps of the CIP process. Tasks will commence in the month of November each year and be completed for submittal by March of the next year. 1. Prepare an inventory of existing facility needs. Each department conducts or updates a facility and major equipment inventory and compiles a list of needed projects for the next five years. 2. Send out Capital Improvement Project Request Forms to all departments with a deadline for submittal to the CIP Committee. The Planning Department performs a preliminary review of projects for conformance with the city's General Plan. 3. Determine the status of previous projects. Provide a statement of status on CIP Request Forms for those projects. Identify estimated costs and any changes to the project from the originally approved project. 4. Perform financial analysis and financial programming. Determine the city's financial capability for major expenditures and examine past, present and future revenue, expenses and municipal debt. The objectives of this process include: a. Determining debt capacity and appropriate debt service levels b. Maintaining a preferred balance of debt service and current expenditures C. Maximizing intergovernmental aid relative to local expenditures The intent is to derive a level of capital expenditures the city can safely afford over the next five years, using corresponding funding, with minimal impact on the property tax rate and other city revenues. 5. Compile and evaluate CIP Request Forms. Members of the CIP Committee review each form and rate each project using established criteria. The Committee develops a proposed CIP for review. 6. Adopt the Capital Improvement Program and budget. The CIP Committee presents the Program to the City Manager for review and concurrence. Next, the Planning and Parks & Recreation Commissions review and comment on the Program. The final step is review and approval by the City Council concurrent with their review of the operating budget for the next fiscal year. 7. Monitor the Program. The CIP Committee, through periodic meetings, monitors the status of projects identified for that fiscal year. Since capital projects often involve time - consuming activities, such as bidding, site selection, and lengthy purchasing and construction delays, actual project implementation may occur somewhat later than the planned designated year. Projects may be split over multiple funding years. Will there be an annual Program Update? Yes, each year the process will review the existing plan, receive new proposals, and update the Program The Committee will bring an updated Program forward to the City Manager and City Council each year in concert with timelines for completion of the annual operating budget proposal. (J W C ° r O a u, o0 r CO Oi Ali M; M N ' O� O� Of O, OI. OI Oe �4 ' O O" O" O: O: O' N': C . O - O''. 11 O O: O .-� � GO n N O r 't''. O O:� O''. O: O' O 0:. O O! O N R 't Mi O� OI O N� O °'i I v rn Cl! N O Ket V O, O'. O LO OI O I 'o c E 10 O:. N'.. a7 r'.. 0:. N ° p` EI `mY : Cm E 0 12 w U m o'. o -O Oi O' O. Oi O'- OI N i 00 0'' E 0 o, 0l 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 ': 0 '. 0 0 0 : 0 : 0: v 0 ol� o' of o'I O N� it Nj O: OI 1 O;f O R .411 O : O O V pp I O Ii of O' O O : O O. O, O O O: N N ' Off' °I OO..Y I E' - ` R pp I O Ii of O' O O : O O. O, O O ml °I OO..Y I E' - ` R r R NI °'i I v rn i Ket V o I 'o c E 0 v m v. m c v 0 0 F- x r'! M,. O: I O: O! N' N a Yj EI. c p'1 m EI E I a'I U m. N m � a m E E 0 c I-- O z I ml °I ' I E' - ` p4 °'i I c? a o o I ° p` EI Cm E 0 12 w U m o'. o -O Z. E 0 o, 0l 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 ': 0 '. 0 0 0 : 0 : 0: v 0 r'! M,. O: I O: O! N' N a Yj EI. c p'1 m EI E I a'I U m. N m � a m E E 0 c I-- O z H Ugyi O O O 1� Oi .- 0! V� W'� al Oj Wi In O', a! W1, O)' Ni N. O)! OI 0: In O IN c-I In N''I '- M', cl � N'; (O'. N" N. N O):- N; O''�, Oi O'. O N! W N N O N! NI, t0. 1�� W M M. j Ni Mi O; N rI COI OI O, .. OD. W:. W' O M' I cm) C d !- O O) i In �! .- CO I, IN N'. dj l Vi'i. J (n F li li 0 I O N O O O O O COI Oi CO` I O O Mj OI [fli N O'- O,'. Oj 'cF O O i� N O O V' M N 1�! �` MF O O N. Imo; MI d7� NI � Cp; N 0',. O: OI O'. V m �., N OD "' O)'; LL } O n O NI COI O: Ni O N Ol O):. O O Oi O I O i o1 ol O: O: O Mi �. N j O M a7: M O O O f O O! O I O In O' O. OIL COI N O I O'I O O N V> O O I CO N,, N N O I ID OI In MII N! o O W In (T M I I O 00 O Ol O O O O� O O I Oli OI O, O� c In MI O)j N OI O. N N O) O M.` � I O r O O NI O OI O O, In O': O� O 0- O� 011i Off; O ll T O O) at N (p O O O' O O O O O 1 O. O�, O� I O: O t O O! In O tt d O O O O O 00 p IN ": m p� O 'O O In N�... V') OI 0 Y, O O O O O,' O" 01 -p N n O In O O O r N 1 N (O U N M� A i m' Y o 0! o M o I. of o E In o. 0 0 0'.. o: o: IN E o o" o, o 0 0 0=. I, I m a 0 x x a u EL- a7 'v m Qr C (CO Li C N N o - ¢ El ll LL LL O LL LL V FT o LL U E2 LL c 7 I,.. 2 o Of c o'I 3 w P . d U o -' �� - - o ''�, w of J3�� = c m m o m V) UJ O f O F O N N N N N xx a N 11 N' ' M M c vcDi �n m cr i of 'I, of pe''. K O CK 1-'. R (h 0 -S� 0 CL CD N 00 CD CD C14 c a. M c W E 0 Q. E cC CL m 0 0. ooci -c� C� C\i C\l r,� 'i 'o 00 Q -4� C\i 0 0 15 W; p to C4 O 0 0 C� 0 ICT Ct Ct LR CIL 0 di U Z ol. 0 0 Ct IIJ cl� C� C� Ni O cci t0 Cli m O pi to oi 0 9 0. cc� E E w IT ii o Cf) w n U) F iq cr j3, L21 0 ® j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Pro•ectName ICate West side public safety facility Other Facilities Pro ect No �CIP No. ities 2004 -13 OF -02 Description Project Location Build /Equip and staff a public safety facility west of Hwy 101, including training West area of city and maintenance facility Department Lead Project 'Manager In current FY .TBD !TBD work plan _ (Project Status: _ Programming :Justification $0 Fu►tdingSo►►rces $0 Increased call demand, reduce response times to high risk facilities, provide $0 Inspections /Cm response to major economic revenue sources for city. $0 jj Public Facilities Financing Plan, Redevelopment fund, $0 $0 Funding per FIGR MOU $0 $0 I $0 $2,600,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 ` (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $0 Other Expenses $15,214,988 $3,965,625 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST .' $0 $0 Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $57,571 $0 H $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,571 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 -$0 Buildings $0 $0 :I $5,404,450 $2,953,137 $0 $0 $8,357,587 Improvements $0 $0 l $0 $3,799,830 $0 $0 Inspections /Cm $0 $0 jj $0 $400,000 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 $2,600,000 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 ` $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 .' $0 $0 $0 $3,799,830 $400,000 ......___________......... $2,600,000 $0 $0 Total Design/ $57,571 $0 $5,404,450 $9,752,967 $0 $0 I $15,214,988 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 PFFP I _ _ $0 _ $0 $4,999,363 $0 $0 $0 Redevelopment Fund $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 $0 $0 FIGR MOU J $0 -- $0 $0 $2,250,000 $0 $0 $0 - _ - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $4,999,363 $4,000,000 $2,250,000 $0 $0 Total Sources I $0 $0 $4,999,363 $6,250,000 l $0 I $0 $11,249,363 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $57,571 $0 $405,087 $3,502,967 I $0 $0 $3,965,625 Dateori mall submitted Date last revised West side public safety facility originally Unfunded Project Last printed of -02 3/23/2001 05/25/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName Category JProject No ICIP No. City Hall Acquisition and Renovation Other Facilities 12004 -33 :OF -04 Description Project Location Purchase and renovation of existing property for City Hall (approx. $7 mil), 130 Avram including telecommunications and furnishings (approx. $850K) - $0 - Buildings Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 D. Jenkins D. Jenkins work plan $0 (Project Status: _ _ I - Justification Construction to be completed summer 2008 City services are currently spread out over several locations. This project will FtmdmgSottrces: consolidate city services in an existing building in order to increase staff efficiency, 1999 Certificates of Participation Public Facilities Financing provide better customer service, reduce citizen vehicle trips. Plan, Sale of property, Cable Equipment Fund Inspections /CM CT COS1 $16,400 =TOTAL nsh•uction) Amount unfunded $0 94 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -I1 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 I I 1 . •oet costs � thrr oe g h EY 2013 Design /Engineering $466,800 $0 !� $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 -_$o $0 _- - $0 - Buildings $1,445,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $3,181,000 $2,689 994 $0 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $52,200 $16,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 _ I $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 _ ( $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 ii $0 ! $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $5,145,000 $2,706,394 ,1 - $0 $0 $p $0 - Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 PEEP $1,854,390 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 Certificates of Participa I $4,977,004 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sale of property $950,000 - - $0 $0 $0 - $0 - $0 Cable equipment fund ( $70,000 $0 - $0 $0 $0 - $0 - $0 - $0 $0 - $0 $0 - $0 - $466,800 $0 $1,445,000 $5,870,994 $68,600 - $0 $0 $0 $7,851,394 Funding sources through FY 2013 $1,854,390 $4,977,004 $950,000 $70,000 - _ $0 Total Sources ' $7,851 394 $0 $0 $0� $0 I $0 $7,851,394 GAP FUNDING NEEDED ($2,706,394) $2,706,394 $0 $0 I $0 -_ $0 $0 Date originally submitted Date last revised City Hall Acquisition and Renovation _......._ Unfunded Project 3/23/2001 05/25/2008 -, Last printed OF-04,_ .... Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project a 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName I C ategory Project No. _...... CIP No ........... .......... Re -roof Performing Arts Center ........ Other Facilities 2005 -06 OF -07 Description Project Location $0 Re -roof Spreckels Performing Arts Center building. Performing Arts Center $0 $0 Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 D. Schwarz 1J. Chung work plan $0 (Project Status: $0 ...... _ Not in current workplan $0 Justification FundutgSources ... The Community Center campus buildings are aging. The Community Center roof , .. .. _..__ . _ ..._... $0 has been replaced, the Sports and Fitness Center will be replaced soon, and the p P P Redevelopment fund $0 wooden shake roof of the PAC is showing signs that it needs to be repaired. $0 $0 $0 TO:L: OJECT COST Sales Tax $0 j (D Construction) Amount unfunded $0 l 1 000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated I I ; FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 I project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 ! $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 __$0 $0 $o_ Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $721,000 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 ! $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 j $0 $0 ;' $0 .............. $0 : $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $0 $721,000 I $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $721,000 $0 $0 ............... $0 $0 $721,000 FUNDING SOURCES Funding SOUI'CeS 11 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Redevelopment Fund $0 $0 $0 $721,000 $0 $0 $721,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 _.. Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $721,000 1 $0 $0 $721,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $Q $0 $0 $0 I $0 $O $0 FDate on mall submitted Date last revised Re -roof Performing Arts Center g y Unfunded Project 3/1/2002 05/09 /2008 Last printed OF-07_ " Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM C C _5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName -- (Category Pt olect No ICIP No. Flooding Mitigation - West side Other Facilities OF -17 ,Description Project Location Mitigation of preexisting storm water flooding problem at the Martin Avenue area Rancho Verde MH Park and Martin Ave area FY 2010 -11 and Rancho Verde Mobile Home Park. Also mitigation of any significant noise impacts at Rancho Verde identified in the NEPA review process for the proposed Department Lead Project Manager In current FY casino resort facilities on the west side. P. Barnes TBD work plan i $0 (Project Status: $0 Justification in current workplan - $0 This project is proposed as mitigation for potential impacts of the casino resort FundirtgSout•ces: - $0 facilities on the Rancho Verde Mobile Home Park and the Martin Avenue area. FIGR MOU -$0 - $0 - $0 $0 I'O'I'AI PROJECT COST - - $0 $0 - (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 _ $700,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST - $0 Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -I1 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 tht" ro ugh costs FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 .1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 ,I $0 $0 - $0 $0 - - $0 - -$0 Buildings $0 I $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $700,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 Contingencies $0 $0 is $0 $0 $0 $0 ! $0 ......... Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 ................. $0 $0 $0 . $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $0 $700,000 I $0 - $0 $700,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FIGR MOU $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 - $0 _ $0 -$0 - $0 - $0 $0 _ $0 - $0 $0 - - $0 $0 _ - $0 $0 - $0 - $0 I $0 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $700,000 $0 $0 .................... - $0 $0 Total Sources $� $0 $0 $700,00)0 0 $0 $700,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I — $0 $0 — $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ....... Date Ori final) Submitted I Date last revised Flooding Mitigation West side g y Unfunded Project Last printed of -17 3/4/2004 05/25/2008 - Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM ° 1 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category (Project No. _.. ICIP No. -' _... City Center Drive Plaza & Pedestrian Improvements ;Other Facilities 12006 -02 OF -27 Description Project Location - - $0 Develop a plaza / public space at the parcel north of the Community Library and City Hall Drive Inspections /CM west of the Public Safety building on City Center Drive. Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 R. Bendorff ,J. Chung work plan d'' Contingencies (Project Status: l - - ;Construction to begin summer 2008 $0 Justification FuncllrtgSources. $0 A public gathering place such as this Plaza is a key element in the City Center $0 $0 Concept Plan, The Plan envisioned a plaza in the City Center Drive area as a Redevelopment fund, Transportation for Livable Communities focal point for cultural, recreational, business and civic functions. Currently, the (TLC) grant $0 City Center area is underutilized, functionally obsolete and not user - friendly. The $0 $0 creation of plaza is a move toward fulfilling the goals of the Plan to create a more - TOT II PROJECT COST $0 vibrant, mixed use environment where residents and visitors gather. (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded _ $0 $3,150,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Land Costs -_ $0 $0 _ $0 - I $0 - - $0 $0 - $0 Buildings $0 ) $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0.. $1,908,514 $675,000 1 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $91486 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $100,000 ( $65,000 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 ! $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,583,514 $151,486 $165,000 $0 Total Design/ $250,000 $2,100,000 ) $800,000 $0 $0 $0 ! $3,150,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 Funding sources Unfunded Project City Center Drive Plaza &Pedestrian Improvements - Last printed OF-27 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 ;TLC Grant I $0 $850,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,150,000 'Redevelopment Fund $250,000 $1,250,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 1 - $0 - - $° $0 $0 $0 ' $0 $0 - - $0 - $0 $0 $° $0 1 $o $° $0 $° $0 _ $0 1 $0 I $0 - $° Total Sources $250000 I $2,100,000 $800,000 $00 $0 j $0 $3,150,000 __........... GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 Unfunded Project City Center Drive Plaza &Pedestrian Improvements - Last printed OF-27 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Date Orl ina11 submitted g y 6/15/2005 Date last revised 04/21/2008 - 6�i I 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName - - (Category Project No �CIP No. Public Works Corporation Yard Expansion FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 . Other Facilities through FY 2013 OF -31 Description $0 $0 Project Location $1,678,500 Expansion of the Corporation Yard at its curent location, or at a new location. 600 Enterprise Drive or new location TBD $0 $0 $0 $p Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 _ $0 $0 D. Jenkins „TBD work plan, _ I $0 $o $o IProject Status: $o Justification $o - - Not in current work plan $o The anticipated growth of the city with General Plan buildout will require improved F'undingSout ces: .. _. _._...... _., ...__ and expanded faciltiies to serve the citizens of Rohnert Park. Public Facilities Financing Plan .... _ . TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $1,678,500 $0 .1 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 thrr ouugh gh costs FY 2073 Desigo /Engineering $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 $p Land Costs $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $p $0 $0 Buildings - -$0 $o I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,678,500 $1,678,500 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 ! - $p $p $p - $p...._ Contingencies $0 - $0 I _ $0 $0 $0 - $p -- $0 -. Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 ... $p $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 ' $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $p $p - $0 $0 $0 $1,678,500 $1,678,500 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 l $0 r $1,678,500 $1,678,500 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 - $0 - _ $0 $0 L $0 $0 $p Date originally submitted Date last revised 1 Public Works Corporation Yard Expansion Unfunded Project 4/18/2006 04121/2008 Last printed OF-31 .......... _ -' Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Funding sources Now FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 PFFP I $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,678,500 $1,678,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o $o $o $o $o $o $o I $o $o $o I $o $p $0 Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 l $0 r $1,678,500 $1,678,500 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 - $0 - _ $0 $0 L $0 $0 $p Date originally submitted Date last revised 1 Public Works Corporation Yard Expansion Unfunded Project 4/18/2006 04121/2008 Last printed OF-31 .......... _ -' Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM ® 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName Category L.......... Project No. ll.._.. ._. CIP No. ( - Eastside Fire Station Other Facilities $0 OF -33 Description Project Location $0 Development of a fully functional fire station on Camino Colegio Avenue within the :TBD $0 Sonoma Mountain Village project to service the eastside of the city. Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 TBD TBD work plan 1 $0 (Project Status: $0 ! ....... _ Not in current work plan $850,000 Justification - FundingSources: $0 - The anticipated general plan buildout will greatly increase the need for fire ........... $0 $0 $0 services and protection on the east side of the city, where most of the anticipated public Facilities Financing Plan $0 residential growth will occur. The existing fire station located on Maurice Avenue $0 $0 is undersized and unable to house the necessary appartus to adequately protect $100,000 the area. The Maurice Avenue station offers no room for expansion or additional - TOTAL " PROJECT COST parking. Public Safety anticipates housing a ladder truck in the new facility along (Design and Consh action) Amount unfunded with the addition of a public meeting room and an unstaffed store- front drop -in report area for the public i $6,250,000 $1,286,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 Land Costs - $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 $750,000 Buildings $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Irnprovements $0 $0 l 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 -- Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Contingencies $0 $0 $0 ! $0 $0 $850,000 Sales Tax $0 $0 - $0 ........... $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $4,000,000 $0 $150,000 $850,000 —$0 $100,000 Total Design / $p $p $p -$0 $0 $6,250,000 I $6,250,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Him FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 PFFP I $0 $0 I' $0 $0 - l $0 $0 $0 $0 - - $0l $0 $0 $4,964,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 !, $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $4,964,000 $0 $0 ....._..- ...... _ -- - $0 - $0 Total Sources I $0 l $0 $0 $4,964,000 $0 $0 $4,964,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED f $0 $O $0 ($4,964,000) $0 $6,250,000 , 11 $1,286,000 Date on inall submitted Date last 1 evlsed Eastside Fire Station g Y ......... Unfunded Project - Last printed 0E-33._ 4/10/2006 04/21/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Pro jectName - -- (Category Project No. (CIP No. -- Public Safety Bay Realignment & Signalization other Facilities :zoos -15 of -35 - - - -- -- Description Project Location Phase 1: Realignment and expansion of access driveway to and from Rohnert Public Safety Building (300 City Center Dr.) to RP Expressway Park Expressway. Phase 2: Complete interior finishing of fire bay, living quarters and exterior landscaping and lighting Department Lead Project Manager In current FY P 1 g Inspections /CM D. Adam J Chung work plan-/ $300,000 1 (Project Status: „Justification Design / engineering The placement of the City Center Plaza adjacent to the public safety headquarters FundmgSources: has made it necessary to create alternate egress for response vehicles during an Redevelopment fund (1999 bond, 2007 bond), FIGR MOU, emergency. A direct route from the existing bay onto Rohnert Park Expressway PFFP exists but the driveway would need to be realigned and expanded to be fully $0 functional. TOTAL "PROJECT COST - $0 (Design in(] Construction) Amount unfunded $0 - $5,000,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 ; HER I roug ct costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $75,000 $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Land Costs $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$0 Buildings $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 - - -- - $3,500,000 -- $0 -- — $0 -- $0 — $0 Inspections /CM $0 $300,000 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $750,000 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $75,000 $4,925,000 1 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 Construction $0 $3,500,000 $300,000 $750,000 __$0 $100,000 $5,000,000 FUNDING SOURCES $333,000 $0 - $0 -- $0 $0 _ $0 i $0 _ $0 1 -$0 - $0 Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 1999 bond 1 $417,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $417,000 2007 bond $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 FIGR MOU J - $0 $2,250,000 $0 - $0 - _ $0 $0 $2,250,000 PFFP - $0 $333,000 $0 - $0 -- $0 $0 _ $0 i $0 $0 $0 1 -$0 - $0 Total Sources $417,000 $4,583,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $333,000 $0 $5,000,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I ($342,000) $342,000 $0 $0 I $0 $0 - - $0 Public Safety Bay Realignment & Signalization Date originally submitted Date last revised Unfunded Project Last printed of s5........ 5/31/2006 06/05/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category Protect No. ICIP No. - ......_ Corridor Improvements (Southwest, Commerce & State Farm) Other Facilities 2007 -16 OF -37 Description Project Location $0 Implementation of streetscape and urban design improvements in the City right of :Southwest Blvd., Commerce Blvd., State Farm Drive way in the Commerce Boulevard, Southwest Boulevard and State Farm Drive Department Lead Project Manager In current FY corridors as part of a the Corridor Revitalization Plan. L. Babonis J. Chun g - work )Ian d' $0 (Project Status: I $1,000,000 Concept plan $0 Justification FI s: $0 Concept Plans are being prepared for the Commerce Boulevard, Southwest " I—, "Ill I $0 Boulevard and State Farm Drive corridors. These Concept Plans will be Redevelopment $0 instrumental in revitalizing these corridors so that are visually appealing, $0 $0 encourage pedestrian use while accommodating vehicular traffic, and foster the $0 Sales Tax redevelopment of underutilized properties. TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 (Design an(] Construction) Amount unfunded Other Expenses $2,860,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated , , , , FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 I projct costs througeh FY 201;3 Design /Engineering $75,000 $0 ii $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 !, $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 .j $0 $0 Improvements $0 $200,000 i $200000 $1,000,000 $1,385,000 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 ......... $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $75,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 ( $1,385,000 $0 Construction $0 l - $0 $° - Unfunded Project $75,000 $0 $0 $2,785,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,860,000 FUNDING SOURCES Fundingsources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Redevelopment Fund $75,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 $1,385,000 $0 $2,860,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0__ _ I $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0- - $0I $0 $0 $0l $0 $° $° Total Sources $75,000 $2,860,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 $1,385,000 - -� $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O $O _ $O $0 l $0 $0 $° - Unfunded Project Corridor Improvements (Southwest Commerce & Sta. 6 — l — Date originally submitted Date Last revised Last printed F-37 _ 5/14/2007 05/09/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project i j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category Project No ICI P No. Copeland Creek Detention Basin & Steelhead Refugla Other Facilities 12006-04 OF -39 Description Project Location $0 Construction of an approximately 65 -75 acre -foot regional detention facility to ;Along Copeland Creek, east of Petaluma Hill Road reduce the 100 -year flow in Copeland Creek - Department Lead Project il9anager In current FY $0 D. Jenkins P Barnes work plan,V (Project Status: justification Developer seeking environmental approval. FuntltogSaurces This project was identified in the Storm Drain Master Plan to minimize flooding in Copeland Creek downstream from Petaluma Hill Road. Tthe dual ponds will also Developer; Copeland Creek Drainage Fund provide temporary refuge for migrating steelhead during a large storm events. TOT�ICPROJECT COST (Design and (Construction) Amount unfunded $4,065,000 L _. _.. - $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 r ugh costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 .f - $0 -_. -- -$0 $0 $0 - $0 - - Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $65000 $4, 000 000 $0 $0 $0 $4,065,000 Inspections/CM $0 $0 it - $Q $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 - $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 _,I $0 $0 $0 _.... $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $65,000 ( $4,000,000 $0 Consd•uction FUNDING SOURCES •� � � � FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 ;Developer I $0 $0 $4,000,000 i $0 $0 - $0 - $0 $0 $0 $4,065,000 Funding sources FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 I $0 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $65,000 $0 - $0 $0.. $0 $0 -$0 Total Sources $0_ it $65,000 1 $4,000,000 $0 $0�— $0 $4,065,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $O $Q _ $Q -- $0 I — $Q $Q [ — $Q — II Date originally submitted Date last revised 1 Copeland Creek Detention Basin & Steelhead Refugi Unfuntletl Project 5/11/2007 06/20/2008 Last printed F-39___ Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project " j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 rro�ectivame -- ._ .. ........_ . ................ Adrian Drive Undergrounding, Phase II Description This project will convert existing residential electric services to accept new underground feed. The work will be for Adrian Drive Undergrounding District No 6 from Bruce Avenue to East Cotati Avenue. Justification Improve appearance of neighborhood Category $0 Protect No, (CIP No. Other Facilities $0 12007 -15 OF -40 Project Location $0 I $0 'Adrian Drive between Bruce Ave. and E. Cotati Ave. Department Lead Project Manager In current FY D. Schwarz J. Chung wot k plan (Project Status: Improvements $0 Awaiting PG &E design, funding FundingSout ces: Design /Engineering $0 $0 .L $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 I $0 ,I $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 ( $0 $0 $831,900 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax -- . $0 $0 ,i .... ....... $0 $0 $0 _ $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 (( $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 1 $0 - $0 $0 I $831,900 $0 construction $0 $0.: $0 $831,900 - _$0 _ $0 ......... $0 $0 $831,900 FUNDING SOURCES $0 $0 _ $0 - - -$0 $o Funding sources - $o $o FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Rule 20A Funds (PG& I $0 $0 $0 $0 $660,000 $0 $660,000 Redevelopment Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $171,900 $0 $171,900 - $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 - - -$0 $o $0 - $o $o $0 - $0 $0 _ $0 $0 l -- — Total Sources ( $0 J $0 $0 $0 $831,900 $0 $831,900 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 t $0 Date originally Submitted Date last l evlsed Adrian Drive Undergrounding, Phase II — g y - ---__ 1 Unfunded Project Last printed OF -40 .. 3/23/2001 05/25/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project N I 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNatne - Category Project No. CIP No. Climate Action Plan Implementation other Facilities _. .._. .._.._. OF -a2 Description Project Location $0 Project development and implementation of 17 measures that include photovoltaic .Various city facilities $0 installations, building HVAC improvements, biodiesel and ethanol fuel; fleet measures; and pump measures. Department Lead Pro ect Manager P --- _ - g _ In current FY $0 P. Bruck .:TBD work plan $0 (Project Status: 1 - Not in current work plan $0 Justification $0 $0 i GHG Reduction Action Plan Analysis (August 2007) recommended several plans FundingSourees: $0 — that included measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce energy Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) grant costs, address equipment problems, and increase the certainty of the City's future $0 i - $0 - energy costs. The capital costs of the various measures would be initially funded $0 $0 through grants or loans obtained by a climate action plan coordinator (paid with "TAL $0 BAAQMD grant) and recouped in future energy savings. PROJECT COST $0 Design and Construction) Amount FO %nfunded $0 $75,000 $7,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated F Y 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Project costs th rough EY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Land Costs $0 _ $0 $0 '- - $0 $0 - $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 ! n $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 _._ $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 — $0 -- Other Expenses $0 $0 i - $0 - $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _....$0 $0 "Total Design/ _ $0 $75,000 $0 -$0 $0 $0 $75,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES _ Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 BAAQMDgrant I .- $0 $'%Stoop $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 - $0.- $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -_ $0 $0 $0 $o $0 -. $0 -$0 $0 I $0 $0 Total Sources - -- $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 oft�0 - I GAP FUNDING NEEDED / Date originally submitted Date last revised Climate Action Plan Implementation Unfunded Project 6!19/2008 06/19/2008 Last printed OF -42 ,rune 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM ' j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 J- - -- ProjectName Category lProject No. 161' No. - - _..... Community Center Plaza & Campus Improvements Parks and Recreation 12006-05 PR -12 Description Project Location Various improvements to Community Center campus as recommended by the Community Center Campus (5401 Snyder Lane) Community Center Master Plan, including decommissioning of the fountain, Department Lead Project Manager ht current FY redesign of the center plaza area, development of adjacent vacant lot and other D. Schwarz J. Chung wort "lan phased projects. —. -- lProject Status: -• Design phase Justification - FundingSources The Community Center campus requires improvements to make it an attractive, - -. . -, - -------- - -- -- functional and marketable venue for events. Wedding receptions in particular Public Facilities Financing Plan, Redevelopment constitute a sizable revenue source for the Community Center. Outdoor concerts and fairs would also be popular activities at the Complex and could possibly $522,000 generate revenue. $0 C "1' COST $0 $0 nstruction) Amount u nfunded =(Design $0 $0 00 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated $o FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering ! $17,000 $283,000 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 -- -- - Buildings $0 I $0 I $0 - $0 ,) $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $1,050 000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $4,050,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $125,000 : - __ $286,000 $0 $0 - $411,000 - Contingencies $0 $0 ( $125000 $286,000 $0 $0 ...- _.__........._ -._.. $411,000 Sales Tax $0 $0 -.� $0 : $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $17,000 $283,000 1 $1,300,000 $3,572,000 ( $0 $0 Construction $5,172,000 FUNDING SOURCES $0 $0 _ $0 $0 . l $0 $0 $0 Funding sources Unfunded Project Community Center Plaza & Campus Improvements Last printed - _ PR-12___ Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Redevelopment Fund I $17,000 $283,000 $1,300,000 $3,050,000 $0 $0 $4,650,000 PEEP $0 $0 $0 $522,000 $0 $0 $522,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o $o $o $o $o $o - - - $0 $p -_ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0_! - -- o Total Sources $17,000 $283,000 $1,300,000 $3,572,000 $0 $0 $5,172,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 _ $0 $0 . l $0 $0 $0 Unfunded Project Community Center Plaza & Campus Improvements Last printed - _ PR-12___ Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Date Orr inall g Y submitted 3/23/2001 Date last r evised 04/21/2008 Project 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12-13 ProjectName Category IPt otect No. ICIP No. Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park — - Parks and Recreation 12007 -19 PR -49 -- Description Project Location __........... Construction of a multi -use trail connecting the service road to Tank No. 8 East of Petaluma Hill Road 2008 -09 (potable water tank serving University District) east of Petaluma Hill Road to FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 Crane Creek Regional Park. This trail is part of a multi - phased project connecting Department Lead I'rojcct Manager In current FY the Copeland Creek Bike Path at its terminus in Sonoma State University to the P. Barnes P Barnes work plan id regional park. (Project Status: $711,270 _ Justification Grant awarded. .............. $0 The trail is shown in regional master plans for parks and open space. The City Full(hngSout w , . ... . $0_ worked with Brookfield Homes to secure a dedication of trail easement on its Open Space District matching $0 property for the construction of a trail connecting the urbanized area of Rohnert grant $0 Park and its citizens to nearby open space resources. $0 $0 _ $0 _ TOTAL PROJECT COST .__ $0 $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $711,270 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 , $0 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Estimated gh costs thPrro uugh FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $20,000 d $131130 $0 $0 $0 $151,130 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 1 -$0 $0 _ $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements 0 $0 $490,600 $0 $0 $0 $490,600 Inspections /CM $0 $0 i $19,540 $0 $0 $0 $69,540 Contingencies $0 $p $0 $0 $0 $0 -- -- $0 _ __ __ ..............___............ Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $20,000 I $691,270 Construction $0 I $0 $0 $711,270 FUNDING SOURCES FY Funding sources 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 :Open Space Grant $0 $151,130 $560,140 $0 '- $0 _ $0 $711,270 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0_ $0 $0 _ -- - -- $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 _ $0 .__ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $0 , $0 _ $0 $0 Total Sources I $0 $151,130 $560,140 $0 $0 1 $0 $711,270^ GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 ($131,130) $131,130 $0 I $0 $0 $0 Date originally su m fitted Date last revised Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park .. _. Unfun(le(1 Project 6/29/2007 Last printed PR 49 06/20/2008 l Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM ® rj 1 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName - -$0 _ $0 1 (Category Project No ICIP No Playground Equipment: Benicia, Colegio Vista & Honeybee Parks Parks and Recreation 2007 -17 PR -so Description $0 Project Location $0 Removal and replacement of playground equipment Contingencies Benicia, Colegio Vista and Honeybee Parks $0 I $0 — _ -_$0 Department Lead Project Manager In current FY Sales Tax $0 G. Miller G. Miller work plan W $0 $0 (Project Status: Other Expenses - - _ .. Purchase in progress summer 2008 $0 - Justification $0 Ft►t►d►ngSources $° Existing playground equipment is worn, damaged, and does not meet current _ $° - $o - safety standards. - $0 Workforce /Housing Balance Grant I $o - $0 $0 - TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $208,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 ! $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 I $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $208,000 - -$0 _ $0 �. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 -_ $0 -i $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 — _ -_$0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 - $0 - $0 -_ $0 $208,000 $0 $0 ..... . $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $208,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 ( $208,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES $O $O $O $0 I - -$0 _ $0 �. $0 Funding sources Unfunded Project FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Wkforce /Hsg Grant $0 $208,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $208,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $° $° $° - -$° $° _ $° - $o - $0 _ _ - $0 $o - I $o - $0 $0 - Total Sources $0 $208,000 $0 $0 -- $0 $0 $208,000 , GAP FUNDING NEEDED - $O $O $O $0 I - -$0 _ $0 �. $0 Unfunded Project Playground Equipment Benicia, Colegio Vista &Hon [,,Date originally Submitted Date last ► CvtSed _ — Last printed PR eo_ 7/13/2007 07/16/2007 - Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName _. Category No (CIP No. Copeland Creek Bike Trail and Bike Path Overlays Transportation �Prolect 2006 -11 TR -o8 ... - -- - - -- - - - -- Description ..... ... Project Location $0 -------- ......... Phase 1: Construct new bike path on SCWA right -of -way on north side of South side of Copeland Creek east of Commerce Blvd. Copeland Creek between Redwood Drive and Rohnert Park Expressway, west of Highway 101. Phase 2: Overlay /reconstruct existing bike path on south side of Department Lead Project Manager p` I g In current FY Copeland Creek, from pedestrian bridge east of Commerce Blvd. to Seed Farm P. Barnes P. Barnes work plan J'; Drive. (Project Status: -- - =° -- Construction to begin summer 2008 $0 _. Justification $0 $0 Phase 1: This proposed facility has been identified as a transportation project FuntlttlgSollrces $0 benefitting the region in the strategic planning process for the Measure M sales Measure M, TDA Article 3 $0 tax proceeds. Phase 2: The asphalt- paved bike path on the south side of $0 $0 ....... Copeland Creek has failed, creating unsafe conditions and possible liability to the $0 _.._ $0 City. TOT A L PROJECT COST $0 $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $525,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated $0 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 th t'rouugh rgh costs F1' 2013 Design /Engineering $31,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,000 Land Costs $0 $0 'ii $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 1 _ $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $385,000 '; $0 $0 - _ $0 -------- ......... $0 ........... Inspections /CM $0 -- $49,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 _. Contingencies $0 $60,000 $0 .` $0 $0 $0 _. Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 ....... $0 $0 _.._ $385,000 $49,000 $60,000 $0 $0 Total Design/ $31,000 $494,000 I $0 $0 ( $0 $0 $525,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES _ Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 TDA I $3,000 $172,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Measure M I $28,000 $322,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 i $0 $0 _ I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 - - $0 - — _ _ Total Sources $31,000 I $494,000 $0 $0 $o — $0 $525,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED ' $0 _ $0 _ $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 _ ........ Date originally submitted Date last revised Copeland Creek Bike Trail and Bike Path Overlays I Unfunded Project Last printed TR -08 3/23/2001 05/25/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project j 5 -Year Capital ImprovementProgt am -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName Category Project No. �.. CIP No I - Wilfred Avenue Widening Transportation $0 :TR-25 Description Project Location Inspections /CM This project is for the reconstruction and widening of Wilfred Avenue between the Wilfred Avenue $0 1999 city limits to the urban growth boundary and includes four travel lanes, a Department Lead Project 'Manager In current FY Class II bike lane on both sides, sidewalks and landscaping. Includes traffic BID TBD work tla signals at Redwood Dr., Labath Ave., and Dowdell Ave. (Traffic signals paid by new development only) (Project Status: $0 -- _ Not in current work plan ...... $0 Justification . FunchngSou► ees $0 Wilfred Avenue will be reconstructed and widened in order to implement the City's ............... - .... $0 Other Expenses General Plan. Under the Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), costs will be split PFFP Redevelopment, FIGR MOU $0 between New Development and Existing development and are based on trip $0 $0 generation rates (identified as Segment 13 in the PFFP). $p $0 $0 TOTAL PROJECT COST _ .. $0 (Design and Construction) Amount _ unfunded A $5,764,340 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated I'. FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -1I FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 :' $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 I $0 $0 $0 j $0 $0 $0 Improvements FY 2008 -09 I FY 2010 -11 $3,975,407 FY 2012 -13 Redevelopment Fund I $0 $0 $0 $0 --$--O .l $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $993,852 ,8 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 1 $0 .......... $795,081 $0 -- $0.....,, Sales Tax ...... $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 ............... - .... $0 Other Expenses $0 1, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $p $0 $0 $5,764,340 I $0 $0 Construction A FUNDING SOURCES IBM FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Redevelopment Fund I $0 $0 $0 $161,000 $0 1 $0 ;PFFP (Roadway) ii $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,936,900 $0 ;PFFP (med /frontage) J $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,462,940 ( $0 PFFP (3 signals) I $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,203,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 I $0 — $3,975,407 $993,852 $795,081 $0 $0 $5,764,340 Minding sources through FY 2013 $161,000 $1,936,900 $2,462,940 $1,203,500 _$0 -- Total Sources ( $0� $0 $0 $161,000 $5,603,340 $0 $5,7164,340 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $0 $5,603,340 I�$5,603,340) $0 $0 ............. Date originally submitted Date last revised Wilfred Avenue Widening Unfunded Project 3/24/2005 05/05/2008 Last printed TR 2a .- Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project i 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNarne Category Project No CIP No Snyder Lane Widening - Phase 1 Transportation 2007 -03 TR -26 Description ........... Project Location $0 This project is for the widening of Snyder Lane between Medical Center Drive and :Snyder Lane Contingencies Southwest Blvd. and includes four travel lanes, a Class II bike lane on both sides $0 I $631,632 bridge at Copeland Creek, sidewalks and landscaping, and two traffic signals (at De artment Lead Project v4aua er --p J In current FY Southwest and Rohnert Park Expressway). D. Jenkins TBD work plant' !! $0 (Project Status: 1 - Justification Designed with Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase i 2 On hold Snyder Lane will be widened in order to implement the City's General Plan. Under ttntlingSources: W. .... , _. �. .,.. _a . the Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), costs will be split between New Public Facilities Finance Plan, Gas Tax 'Total Design/ Development and Existing users and are based on trip generation rates (identified $0 $4,667,216 as Segment 12 in the PFFP. $0 $0 Construction TOTAL PROJECT' COST ___..... - $732,250 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $4,680,118 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 thproject costs rough F1' 2013 Design /Engineering $12,902 ! $0 'ii $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,902 Land Costs $p __ $Q $p ._ $0 $0 $0 ._ $0 Buildings $0 $0 I $0 ! $0 $0 $0._ $0 Improvernents $0 $0 1 $3,228,668 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 it $806,916 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 I $631,632 $0 $0 $Q Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . ... .. — $0 ----- .. -- Other Expenses $0 $0 it $0 $0 $0 $0 'Total Design/ $12,902 $0 $4,667,216 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 - $732,250 _ $0 $0 $ FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 PFFP (roadway) $0 ! $0 ! $2,259,300 $0 $0 $0 PFFP (med /frontage) $0 $0 $1,133,668 $0 $0 1 $0 PFFP (bridge) . _ J $0 $0 $467,000 $0 $0 $0 ;PFFP (2 signals) $0 $0 - $732,250 _ $0 $0 $ Gas Tax $0 $0 $87,900 $0 $0 $_ $3,228,668 ........ - $806,916 $631,632 $0 $4,680,118 Funding sources through FY 2013 $2,259,300 $1,133,668 $467,000 $732,250 $87,900 Total Sources $0 $0 $4,680,118 $0 1 $0 i $0 $4,680,118 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $12,902 $0 j ($12,91)2) $Q $0 $0 $0 — - Date originally submitted F Date last revised Snyder Lane Widening Phase t Project Last printed TR 26 2/9/2004 05/08/2008 Unfuntletl Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNatne (Category ]Project ....... No. lCIP No Rohnert Park Expressway Widening - East Transportation 2005 -10 TR -27 Description 1 Project Location $0 This project is for the widening of Rohnert Park Expressway between Snyder Rohnert Park Expressway $0 Lane and Petaluma Hill Road and includes four travel lanes, a Class I bike lane Department Lead Project 14anager Li Current FY on both sides, sidewalks and landscaping. This project includes traffic signals at Petaluma Hill Road and Eleanor Ave. TBD TBD -F workaplan $0 !_ Project Status: $0 - Not in current work plan $0 Justification FunchngSout ces ....... $0 Rohnert Park Expressway will be widened in order to implement the City's $0 $0 General Plan. Under the Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), costs will be split Public Facilities Finance Plan, Measure M $0 between New Development and Existing users and are based on trip generation $0 $0 rates (identified as Segment 8 in the PFFP). $0 Total Design / $0 TAL PROJECT COST _ $9,302,170 ( esign and Construction) Amount Ei unfunded Construction $9, 302,170 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST ! _ $0 Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 ! $0 $0 ! $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 �- $0 ;' $6,415,290 - $0 $0 _ Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $0 $1,603,822 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 $0 $1,283,058 $0 $0 ........ Sales Tax $0 ....... $0 -. $0 $0 $0 ..__ ................. $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 ) $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design / $0 $0 $0 $9,302,170 ( $0 $0 Construction _ $0 _ $0 $0 ! _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,415,290 $1,603,822 $1,283,058 $0 $0 $9,302,170 FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 .Gas Tax I $0 $0 $0 $0 $201,900 $0 $201,900 PFFP (roadway) _ $0 $0 $0 $4,037,400 $0 $0 $4,037,400 PEEP (coed /frontage) ! $0 $0 $0 $4,004,370 $0 $0 $4,004,370 PEEP (2 signals) ! $0 $0 $0 $1,058,500 $0 $0 $1,058,500 $0 I _ $0 _ $0 $0 ! _ $0 $0 $0 - — — — — Total Sources $9,100,270 ! $201,900 —� $0 $9,302,170 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $0 $201,900 ! ($201,900) $0 $0 Rohnert Park Expressway Widening - East !—Date originally submitted Date last revised l Unfunded Project 2/9/2004 05/05/2008 Last printed TR 27. Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName Dowdell Avenue Reconstruction and Extension Description This project is for the reconstruction, of Dowdell between Wilfred Avenue and 750 feet south of Wilfred, and the extension of Dowdell between 750 feet south of Wilfred to Business Park Drive and includes two travel lanes, bridge improvement at Business Park Drive, Class II bike lane on both sides, sidewalks and landscaping. Justification Dowdell will be reconstructed and extended in order to implement the City's Gn IPI 11 h P [Category Project No. ICIP No Transportation PFFP). 7R -28 Project Location :' $0 . Dowdell Avenue - Department Lead Project illanager In current FY TBD TBD Project Status. work lan Not in current work plan TOTAL PROJECT COST ......... _._ -- .. ............ - FundmgSources: - .._.._...; e era an. n er t e ublic Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), costs will be paid fully by New Development and are based on trip generation rates (identified as Public Facilities Financing Plan FY 2009 -10 Segments 3 and 4 in the PFFP). FY 2012 -13 PEEP (roadway) $0 :' $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,322,200 PFFP (bridge) I - $0 $0 _ $0 TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 i $754,000 i,PFFP (frontage) $0 $0 $0 (Design an(] Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $1,283,118 $0 - $0 $0 $3,359,318 _ $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $o $o $o $o _ $o II I: FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 tistimated project costs through through P1'2013 Design /Engineering $0 ! $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $p $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 Buildings $0 ( $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -, Improvements $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $2,316,771 $2,316,771 Inspections /CM $0 $0 j $0 $0 $0 $579,193 $579,193 Contingencies $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $463,354 $463,354 Sales Tax $0 $0 .,, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ! $0 Total Design/ $0 - $0 $0 $0 I $0 $3,359,318 $3,359,318 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources through FY 2013 $1,322,200 $754,000 $1,283,118 $0 .. ............... .. .. .. ..... $0 Total Sources $0 l $0 $0 $0 I $0 33 59,318 $3,359,318 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O $O $0 -$O $ $O -_ $0 ! Date originally submitted Date last revised Last Avenue Reconstruction and Extension __Project Last printed TR 28 2/9/2004 06/02/2008 n untied Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 PEEP (roadway) $0 :' $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,322,200 PFFP (bridge) I - $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 i $754,000 i,PFFP (frontage) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,283,118 $0 - $0 $0 r - $0 $0 I _ $0 $o $o $o $o $o _ $o Funding sources through FY 2013 $1,322,200 $754,000 $1,283,118 $0 .. ............... .. .. .. ..... $0 Total Sources $0 l $0 $0 $0 I $0 33 59,318 $3,359,318 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O $O $0 -$O $ $O -_ $0 ! Date originally submitted Date last revised Last Avenue Reconstruction and Extension __Project Last printed TR 28 2/9/2004 06/02/2008 n untied Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName $0 — Category Project No. L.- — CIP No. . - .Traffic Light -RPX @Rancho Verde MH Park Inspections /CM Transportation Trans p � TR -31 Description $0 Project Location- - - Traffic signal at Rohnert Park Expressway and entry to the Rancho Verde Mobile ' Rohnert Park Expressway $0 Home Park. $0 Department Lead Project Manager In current FY Sales Tax $0 TBD TBD work plan'; $0 $0 (Project Status: Other Expenses -_ - $0 Not in current work plan $0 Justification $0 .. Fun(1ingSources This traffic signal will be needed if regional developments in this area occur. Funding per FIGR MOU - TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $200,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated - FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 ! $0 '1 $0 $0 $0 $0 t $0 Land Costs - $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0- $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0_- $0 $0 — - - -$0 $200,000 - -- $0 Inspections /CM $0 - - $0 - $0 -- $0 $0 $0 Contingencies - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 I $0 $0 ( $200,000 - $0 (' - $200,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES l � FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FIGR MOU $0 $0 $0 $0 - $200,000 1 -_ $0- $p $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o - $0 1 $0 $o $° 1 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $200,.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 - - — - — - - Total Sources 1 $0 s' 0 $0 $0 J $200,0 0 $0 $200,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I - - $0 $O $O $O I - _ $0 $0 $O Date on inall submitted Date last t evised Traffic Light - RPX @ Rancho Verde MH Park 2004 06/02/200 Project Last printed TR 31 g y Unfunde(I Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName Rohnert Park Expressway Rehabilitation Description Reconstruct, overlay and slurry seal various segments of Rohnert Park Expressway. Justification The Metropolitan Transportation Commission is funding Metropolitan Category Project No ICIP No. Transportation 2005-02 4TR-34 Project Location $552,550 ;; ;Rohnert Park Expressway $0 Department Lead Project Nlanager In current FY P. Barnes P Barnes work plan:/', (Project Status: _ Contingencies Construction to be complete summer 2008 FuntlingSoutces Buildings $0 ( $0 $0 $0 Improvements $1,115,404 $552,550 ;; $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $5,200 j $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 '' $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,667,954 $5,200 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $1,115,404 $0 $0 $0 $0 .- $0 -- - - - $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,667,954 $5,200 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $1,115,404 $557,750 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $1,673,154 Construction FUNDING SOURCES _ Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Federal funds I $900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900,000 Gas Tax $300,000 $226,154 $0 $0 $0 $0 $526,154 Measure M $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 TFCA I $47,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 _ $47,000 $0 I $0 $0 $0 I $0 1 $0 $0 Total Sources $1,447,000 j $226154 $0 $0 $0�- $0 $1,673,154 GAP FUNDING NEEDED ($331,596 ) $331,596 $0 $0 I $ $0 Date on inall submitted Date last revised Rohnert Park Expressway.Rehabilitation g y Unfunded Project 4/2/2004 06/02/2008 Last printed TR 3a Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Project Nante Category ]Project No. ]CIP No Keiser Avenue Improvements Transportation TR -35 Description Project Location FY 2009 -10 This project is for the reconstruction and improvement of Keiser Avenue between Keiser Avenue FY 2012 -13 Snyder Lane and Petaluma Hill Road. The new road includes two travel lanes, a D atment Lead Project Manage" e p ►' In Current FY median, a Class 11 bike lane on both sides, 2 traffic signals (Petaluma Hill Rd and TBD TBD work plan', Snyder Ln), sidewalks and landscaping. (Project Status: I - - _- Not in current work plan $0 Justification - FttttdittgSout ces PFFP (med /frontage) Keiser Avenue will be widened in order to implement the City's General Plan. $0 . _ $0 Under the Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), costs will be split between New Public Facilities Finance Plan, Gas Tax $2,934,738 ...__ Development and Existing users and are based on trip generation rates (identified ( $0 $0 as Segment 7 in the PFFP) $0 $0 $870,000 TOTAL PROJECI`C:OST $0 $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded I $0 $6,999,938 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 j $0 ..- ........: $0 $0 $4,827,543 $4,827,543 .................... Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $1,206,886 $1,206,886 ....... Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $965,509 $965,509 .......... ... Sales Tax $0 $0 .` $0 $0 $0 $0 ......... $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $6,999,938 ! $6,999,938 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $388,700 - PFFP (roadway) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,806,500 PFFP (med /frontage) $0 ._ ................ . _.... $0 . _ $0 $0 $0 $2,934,738 ...__ PFFP (2 signals) ( $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $870,000 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $ Funding sources through FY 2013 $388,700 $2,806,500 $2,934,738 $870,000 $0 !. Total Sources l $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 1 $6,999,938 $6,999,938 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I _ $0 _ $0 _ $0 $0 -- $O $0 $0 Date originally submitted Date last revised Keiser Avenue Improvements 5/21/2004 06/02/2008 Project Last printed TR 35 ._ Unfunded Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName Category lProject No. ICI No. Bodway Parkway Extension Transportation TR -49 Description Project Location This project is for the extension of Bodway between Valley House Drive and Bodway Parkway Railroad Avenue. The extension will include two travel lanes, a Class II bikeway on both sides of the street, 2 traffic signals (Valley House Dr. & Railroad Ave.), De tment Lead Project Manager p a►' In current FY sidewalks and a landscape strip. TBD 713D work tlan FY 2012 -13 (Project Status: $0 ......... ° - Not in current work plan $0 Justification -- PFFP (roadway) Bodway will be extended in order to implement the City's General Plan. Under the FundingSources: $0 Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), costs are split between Existing /New Dev. Public Facilities Finance Plan, Gas Tax, Traffic Signalization based on projected trip generation rates (identified as Segment 1 in the PFFP) Fund $0 $0 TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $828,403 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded I $0 j $2,895,159 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated Traffic Signalization Fu FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 II t; -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 thI" ro ugh costs PY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 Buildings $0 $0 I $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,930,106 $1,930,106 Inspections /CM $0 1 $0 ! $0 $0 $0 $579,032 $579,032 Contingencies $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $386,021 $386,021 Sales Tax $0 $0 1 $0 —$0 $0 $0 $0 !. Other Expenses $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,895,159 $2,895,159 Construction - _ FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 ;Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $63,900 PFFP (roadway) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,012,856 PFFP (med /frontage) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $828,403 ._... - - PFFP (2 signals) I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $870,000 Traffic Signalization Fu $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $120,000 (loafing sources through FY 2013 $63,900 $1,012,856 $828,403 $870,000 ._......._.. $120,000 Total Sources $0 IF $0 $0 $0 I $0 $2 895,159 $2 895,159 GAP FUNDING NEEDED ( $0 $0 $0 _ $Q I $0 $0 $0 Date originally submitted Date last revised Bodway Parkway Extension Unfunded Project Last printed TR as _ 3/24/2005 06/02/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project j j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category Project No. ICIP No. Snyder Lane Widening - Phase 2 Transportation p FY 2012 -13 TR -56 Description Project Location - - $0 This project is for the widening of Snyder Lane between southside "G" section and $152,500 I - $0 $152,500 Creekside Middle School and includes four travel lanes, a Class I bike lane on Department Lead Project \tanager In current FY both sides, 1 traffic signal (Eleanor Ave.) sidewalks and landscaping. - TBD TBD $2,897,900 work plan $2,897,900 (Project Status: $0 1 - - _ Not in current work plan $1,697,916 $0 Justification FuttdingSources Snyder Lane will be widened in order to implement the City's General Plan. Under , the Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), costs will be split between New Public Facilities Finance Plan, Gas Tax $0 Development and Existing users and are based on trip generation rates (identified $0 $0 $844,000 as Segment 10 in the PFFP. $844,000 ;PFFP (signal) $0 $0 ,TOTAL PROJECT COST - l $297,250 I $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $5,889,566 $0 l DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 $0 Dest g n /En g' meer m g $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _$0 Land Costs $0 $0 - $0 - -_ - $0 $0 - -- $0 $0 Buildings $0- ( $0 $0 $0 $0 -$0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 r $0 !, $0 $4,061,770 - $0 _ $4,061,770 Inspections /CM $0 $0 '! $0 $0 - $1,015,442 $0 $1,015,442 Contingencies $0 $0 $0 $0 $812,354 $0 : ..........__.._.. ___..._.. . $812,354 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0... $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,889,566 $0 �$5889,566 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $5,889,566 $0 $0,889,566 _..... _._.. GAP FUNDING NEEDED — $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 —_ $0 _ $0 , t t Snyder Lane Widening- Phase 2 Date IASt evd iDate originally submitted Last printed TR 56 -- 3/24/2005 06/02/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Gas Tax I" $0 $0 $0 $0 $152,500 I - $0 $152,500 PFFP (roadway) $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,897,900 $0 $2,897,900 ;PFFP (med /frontage) $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,697,916 $0 $1,697,916 .PFFP (bridges) I $0 $0 $0 $0 $844,000 li $0 $844,000 ;PFFP (signal) $0 $0 $0 $0 l $297,250 I $0 $297,250 Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $5,889,566 $0 $0,889,566 _..... _._.. GAP FUNDING NEEDED — $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 —_ $0 _ $0 , t t Snyder Lane Widening- Phase 2 Date IASt evd iDate originally submitted Last printed TR 56 -- 3/24/2005 06/02/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName ICategory IProject No ICIP No. Snyder Lane Widening - Phase 3 Transportation f TR -57 Description Project Location This project is for the widening of Snyder Lane between Creekside Middle School and Medical Center Drive and includes four travel lanes, a Class II bike lane on 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 both sides, bridge crossing at Hinebaugh Creek, sidewalks and landscaping. Department Lead Project Agana er 1 J g Lt current FY Gas Tax TBD TBD work plan_ !: $0 IProject Status: $37,200 Justification Not in current work plan I, Snyder Lane will be widened in order to implement the City's General Plan. Under , FuntlingSom ces: _ the Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), costs will be split between New Public Facilities Finance Plan, Measure M PFFP (med /frontage) Development and Existing users and are based on trip generation rates (identified $0 $0 as Segment 11 in the PFFP) $276,122 $O__ PFFP (bridge) $Q $0 =TOTALPROJECTCOST uction) Amount unfunded $0 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 l $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 - Buildings $0 $0 j $0 $0 I $0 $0 -$0 Improvements $0 $0 �— $0 $0 $1,333,257 $0 $1,333,257 ......... Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $333,314 $0 $333,314 Contingencies $0 $0 $0 $0 $266,651 $0 $266,651 Sales Tax $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 - I $0 $0 I $0 $1,933,222 $1,933,222 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Gas Tax I $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,200 !, $0 ;PFFP (roadway) I, $0 _ _ , , $0 PFFP (med /frontage) J $p $0 $0 $0 $276,122 $O__ PFFP (bridge) $Q $0 $0 $0 _ $467,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $p I 1 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $37,200 $1,152,900 $276,122 $467,000 $0 Total Sources ( $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,933,222T - $0 $1,933,222 ; GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 $O $O $0 $0 $O $O. Date originally submitted Date last revised Snyder Lane Widening- Phase 3 Unfunded Project 3/2412005 06/02/2008 Last printed TR 57 ..... Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNarne - (Category (Project No. ICIP No. - Seed Farm Drive Extension Transportation ........_____.__...__._____.. Description Project Location $O , _ $O _I — $0 $0 This project is for the extension of Seed Farm Drive between Rohnert Park Funding sources Expressway and Enterprise Drive and includes two travel lanes, a Class II bike Department Lead Project A'lanager FY 2008 -09 In current FY lane on both sides, 1 traffic signal (Enterprise Dr.), sidewalks and landscaping. TBD TBD FY 2012 -13 work plan .Gas Tax (Project Status: $0 $0 $251,800 Not in current work plan $0 $251,800 Justification FunchngSour ces $0 $0 Seed Farm Drive will be extended in order to implement the City's General Plan" $0 $0 - -•• -- Under the Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), costs will be split between New Public Facilities Finance Plan, Measure M $0 Development and Existing users and are based on trip generation rates (identified $457,899 $0 as Segment 9 in the PFFP. $457,899 ;PFFP (1 signals) I $0 $0 $0 TO:II CT COST $0 $0 $435,000 ;Traffic Signalization Fu Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $120,000 99,299 $0 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 _ $0 -_ $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings - $0 I $0 :i; $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $965,034 $0 $0 $965,034 Inspections /CM $0 $0 i $0 $241,258 $0 $0 $241,258 Contingencies $0 - $0 $0 $193,007 $0 $0 - $193,007 Sales Tax $0 $0 . $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $0 $1,399,299 I $0 - $0 Construction $1,399,299 FUNDING SOURCES $0 —_ $0 $O , _ $O _I — $0 $0 $0 _. Funding sources Seed Farm Drive Extension Last printed TR 5s_ Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Date originally submitted 3/24/2005 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 .Gas Tax I $0 $0 $0 $251,800 $0 $0 $251,800 PFFP (roadway) $0 $0 $0 $134,600 $0 $0 $134,600 ;PFFP (med /frontage) $0 $0 $0 $457,899 $0 $0 $457,899 ;PFFP (1 signals) I $0 $0 $0 $435,000 $0 $0 $435,000 ;Traffic Signalization Fu $0 I $0 $0 $120,000 I $0 $0 $120,000 -- Total Sources ( $00� $0 $0 $1,399,299 - $0 $0 $1,399,299 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 —_ $0 $O , _ $O _I — $0 $0 $0 _. Unfuntlet Project Seed Farm Drive Extension Last printed TR 5s_ Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Date originally submitted 3/24/2005 — Date last revised 06/02/2008 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProlectName Category (Project No. ICIP No. g @ Traffic Signal -Seed Farm RPX Transportation TR -6o _._..._ __. Description Project Location This project consists of the installation of a traffic signal at Seed Farm Drive and Seed Farm Drive (ext.) @ Rohnert Park Expressway Rohnert Park Expressway. Department Lead Project Manager In current FY TBD TBD work plan Project Status: - Not in current work plan Justification ..........- -- _.......J This signal is needed to make the intersection operate acceptably and to -Fund ingSour•ecs: accommodate traffic from new development in the area ' d General Plan in actor ante with the Public Facilities Finance Plan TOTAL PROJECI`COS'r (Design an(] Construction) Amount unfunded I. $395,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST ' 11 t: FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Estimate(] costs r ugh through F1' 2073 Design/Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $Q Land Costs $0 $0 I $0 - $0 -$0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - Improvements $0 $0 I $0 " $0 $360,000 $0 $360,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 - - $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies - $0 $0 I $0 $0 $35,000 _ - $0 _ $35,000 Sales Tax $0 - - - - -- $0 — —0 $0 ..—... - -- -_. $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0. $0 $0 $0 $0 $Q Total Design/ Construction $0 $0 i $0 $0 I $395,000 $0 - $395,000 FUNDING SOURCES FY Funding sources 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 PEEP $0 -_ $0 $0 - $0 $395,000 - - $0 $395,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0_ $Q $0 $0 $0 _ $0 I. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 ._ $0 I $0 $0 $0 Total Sources $0 $0 $p $395,000 _ $0 $395,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $Q $0 $0 $O I $0 — $0 $0 Date originally submitted Date last revised Traffic Signal Seed Farm @ RPX 1 Project printed TR 6o 3/24/2005 06/02/2008 Last ri Unfundet p • Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM ® 1 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category (Project No ICIP No. Holly -Fauna Bike Bridge ;Transportation Holly -Fauna Bike Bridge TR -67 Description Project Location FY 2010 -11 Bike / pedestrian bridge connecting the western terminus of Holly Avenue and Wilfred Channel Extension at Holly Ave and Fauna Ave eastern terminus of Fauna Avenue at the Wilfred Channel Extension Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 TBD TBD work plan $0 (Project Status: $0 $0 Not in current work plan $0 Justification - - $0 The City's Bike Master Plan and General Plan show a Class III route through Holly FantiittgSources: _.. , and Fauna Avenues, crossing over the Wilfred Channel Extension, Currently, Transportation Development Act (TDA) fund $0 there is no "official" crossing here. Pedestrians and cyclists who want to get to the - - I $0 $0 other side either wade through the creek or travel south along the creek about $0 $0 300' to the golf course, where the channel goes underground. A bike /ped bridge -TOTAL PROJECT COST -_ $o would enable a safe crossing of the creek and properly connect the two Class III (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded routes along Holly and Fauna Avenues. _ $° $o $° $190,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -I1 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 II $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 j $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Lnprovements $0 $0 I $0 $190,000 $0 $0 $190,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 ! $0 ! _ ... -_ $0 $0 $0 $0 - Contingencies _ $0 $0_ i $0 $0 $0 $° $0 ............. Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 _$0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 'total Design/ $p $0 $0 - $190,000 $0 $0 Construction $190,000 FUNDING SOURCES $O $0 -. $0 $0 $O $O $0 Fmul i n g so a tees Holly -Fauna Bike Bridge Date on mall submitted L_ g Y_ FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 ;TDA - I $0 $0 $0 $190,000 $0 $0 - $190,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - -- . ........... $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 - - I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -_ $o $° $0 $o I _ $° $o $° Total Sources �— $0 $190,000 $0 $0 $190,000 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O $0 -. $0 $0 $O $O $0 Unfunded Project Holly -Fauna Bike Bridge Date on mall submitted L_ g Y_ Date last t evtsed 1 - Last printed TR 67 3/20/2006 04/21/2008 ' Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName -- ...... (Catego►y Project No. ICIP No. 2007 Various Streets Rehabilitation iTransportation 2006 -08 TR -69 - - - Description -- - Project Location .......... Street overlays on segments of Commerce Blvd., Country Club Drive, Golf Course ;Commerce Blvd, Country Club Dr, Golf Course Dr, Roberts La Drive, Roberts Lake Road. (aka Rohnert Park Fed. Proj. No. STPL 5379 -015) Various Streets Rehabilitation, Department Lead Project \Iaua c In current FY P. Barnes P Barnes work plari IPr•oject Status: - - Construction completion summer 2008 Justification - - I his project is needed to maintain the streets in good condition. FuntlittgSources Federal, Gas Tax, Measure M, RAC Grant L PROJECT COST [(D:esign and Construction) Amount unfunded $1311,825 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated II I: FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -I1 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 thl" ro ugh costs FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 .i $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0- _ $0 _ Buildings $0 I $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $835,411 $473,914 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,309,325 Inspections /CM $0 $2,500 $0 _.._. $0 $0 $0 $2,500 Contingencies $0 $0 ( $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 . $0 L $0 $0 $0 $0 -- - -.._. Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 'total Design/ $835,411 $476,414 � $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,311,825 Construction FUNDING SOURCES _ Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Federal I $632,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $632,000 'Gas Tax $252,250 $67,375 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $319,625 Measure M $240,000 _... 1 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $240,000_ .RAC Grant $120,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,200 $0 I $0 $0 $0 -- $0 $0 $0 — - - Total Sources $1,,244 450 $67,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,311,825 GAP FUNDING NEEDED ($409,039) $409,039 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 Date on mall submitted Date last revised 2007 Various Streets Rehabilitation ed Project - y Unfund Last printed TR ss _ 3/25/2005 06/02/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project Description ProjectName 2008 Street Surface Repairs 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Description Preventative maintenance treatments such as crack seal and slurry seal of various streets in accordance with City's Pavement Management Program. (Base bid project estimate is $744,000. Alternate bid estimate adding Rohnert Park Expressway is $200K.) Justification Thic nnnninn nrnnram iS nr.adPd to maintain the streets in aood condition. Category (Project No. ICIP No. Transportation 12007 -13 1TR-70 Construction to begin summer 2008 ........ FundingSources: Buildings $0 $0 $0 !i $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $606,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $55,000 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $65,000 I $0 $0 $0 $0 .......... Sales Tax $0 $0 11 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $806,000 $55,000 $65,000 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $744,000 $200,000 $0 ( $0 $0 I $944,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Gas Tax I $0 $131,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $331,000 Measure M $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Prop. 42 -_ __- $0 $413,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $413,000 _ $0 _ $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $ - $0 $0 1 $o _. $o $0 1 $o $o $0 Total Sources I $0 $744,000 $200,000 $0� $0 $0 $944,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0- �' $0 2008 Street Surface Repairs Date originally submitted Date last revised( ed Project Unfund Last printed TR 70_. ... .............. _ 4/21/2008 06/02/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Improvements 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNarne ...... Category Project No ICIP No. Lancaster Drive Rehabilitation — $0 Transportation 2007-14 TR -71 - - - Description $0 Project Location $0 Rehabilitation of Lancaster Drive $0 Lancaster Drive $0 $0 Sales Tax Department Lead Project Nlanager In current FY $0 $0 P. Barnes P. Barnes work Other Expenses $0 (Project Status: $0 Justification $0 Design phase. Construction in summer 2009 ........_ anticipated. The 2007 update of the Pavement Management System indicated a need for FuruhngSources: $0 rehabilitative and overlay work to this collector street. $p Gas tax, Measure M, Prop. 1 B Consh•uction $0 $0 -$0 i I'O "I AL PROJECT COST - - $0 $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded I $0 $0 $1,479,689 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST I : FY 2008 -09 PLUME= FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Estimated costs ti, Irrough rgh FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $90,000 i $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 - $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $1,209,689 I $0 $0 $0 _ $0 _ Inspections /CM $0 $80,000 :.' $0 $0 -- - $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $100,000 ,I $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . ____. Total Design / _ .... _.._ _.____.._...... $0 $1,479,689 $0 -$0 $p $p Consh•uction $0 $0 -$0 - $0 - $0 - $p -- $1,209,689 $80,000 $100,000 --- --- $0 $0 $1,479,689 FUNDING SOURCES Funding sonrees FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 ;Gas Tax $0 $85,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 ;Measure M $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Prop. 1B $0 - . - - - -- $692,760 $651,929 $0 $0 $0 $1,344,689 ....___ ........... ......... $0 $0 $0 -$0 - $0 - $0 - $p - $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 . —_ -�- - -- - - - Total Sources $0 i $827,760 $651-.,929 $� - $0 $0 $1,479,689 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $651,929 ($651,929) $0 $0 $0 $0 ate originally submitted Date last revised Lancaster Drive Rehabilitation D Unfuntletl Project 4/21/2008 04/21/1008 - Last printed TR 71 _ Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM ® 1 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName ._ $0 (Category - IProject No. ICIP No. 2009 Street Surface Repairs Project $0 Transportation $0 TR -72 Description $0 Project Location $0 Preventative maintenance treatments of various streets in accordance with City's City -wide $0 11 Pavement Management Program. Design phase is expected to begin in Summer , , Lead 1 t oject A�Iauager In current FY 2009 with bid and construction in Fall 2009.Departntent $0 TBD TBD work plan $0 $0 IProject Status: - Not in current work plan Justification F untltttgSout Ces This ongoing program is needed to maintain the streets in good condition. Gas Tax, CIWMB Grant (RAC chip seal) TO "I"L PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $200,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated t I ; FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $� $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 r_ Improvements - $0 - -- $0 .- $150,000 $0 —$0 $0 $150,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 _ I $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Contingencies $0 $0 I $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Sales Tax $0 $0 L $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 j $200,000 $0 $0 $0 Construction $200,000 FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources Ion 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12. FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Gas Tax �, $0 $0 $50,000 ! $0 $0 $0 $50,000 CIWMB grant $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ I $o $0 $0 - $0 $0 11 $0 $0- $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 Total Sources $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $O $O $O $0 $0 $0 1 $0 Date originally submitted Date last revised 2009 Street Surface Repairs Project [ Unfunded Project Last printed TR 72 6/25/2007 06/25/2007 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project ri ProjectNanle 2009 Street Rehabilitation Project 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Description Overlay or reconstruction of various streets in accordance with City's Pavement Management Program. Design phase is expected to begin in Fall 2009 with bid and construction in Spring /Summer 2010. Justification This ongoing program is needed to maintain the streets in good condition. Category Project No. ICIP No. (Project Status: Not in current work plan FundingSources: FUNDING SOURCES $0 $0 ._ _$0 Gas Tax, Measure M, Prop. 42 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $o I PROJECT CO S "f FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Gas Tax I $0 $0 [TO:Ir'AIIL nd Construction) Amount unfunded $0 Measure M $0 $0 $240,000 1,050,000 $0 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 $440,000 -$0 $0 Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 th project " costs rough FY 2013 DesignlEngineertng $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Land Costs $0 $0 .� $0 $0 $Q $0 - $0 Buildings $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ I►nprovements $0 $0 !� $0 _..._ - $8 8 00- ,000 $0 -- $0 — ..__.. $800,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $85,000 $0 - - $0 $85,000 Contingencies $0 $0 $0 i $85,000 $0 $0 $85,000 Sales Tax $0 $0 [ $0 ...... $0 $0 $0 ! $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $80,000 $970,000 $0 $0 $1,050,000 Construction ,I FUNDING SOURCES $0 $0 ._ _$0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $o I $0 - FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Gas Tax I $0 $0 $160,000 $50,000 $0 $0 Measure M $0 $0 $240,000 $160,000 - _ $0 $0 Prop. 42 $0 $0 $440,000 -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ._ _$0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $o I $0 - Funding sources through FY 2013 $210,000 $400,000 $440,000 - $0 $0 Total Sources $0 $0 $840,000 $210,000 I $0 $0 $1,050,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O - $O ($760,000) $760,000 I - $O $O $O Date Originally SUhmitted Date IdSt revlSed 2009 Street Rehabilitati on Project Project Unfunded Last printed TR 73 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project 1 j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName Category Project No �....... - CIP No. ... _ - 2010 Street Surface Repairs Project Transportation TR -74 Description Project Location - $0 Preventative maintenance treatments of various streets in accordance with City's City -wide $0 Pavement Management Program. Design phase is expected to begin in Department Lead Project N9anager In current FY Spring /Summer 2010 with bid and construction in Fall 2010. TBD TBD - -, work plan _ $0 (Project Status: $0 $0 Not in current work plan $115,000 Justification $0 Inspections /CM This ongoing program is needed to maintain the streets in good condition. FuntlingSout Ces $0 $10,000 Gas Tax, Measure M $0 Contingencies PROIGC "1' COS "T $0 ; $0 ! sign and Construction) Amount EiTAL unfunded $0 $150,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 F,stimated $0 $0 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering', $0 $0 ii $0 $15,000 $0 $0 Land Costs - $0 $0 !I - $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 ; $0 ! $10,000 _. $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ - $p $0- i - $0 $150,000 - $0 $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES $15,000 $0 $0 $115,000 $10,000 $10,000 _.$0_._ $0 $150,000 Funding sources through FY 2013 $70,000 $80,000 - -$0 ...... $0 $0 . _ - Total Sources $0] $0 $0 $150,000 $0� $0 $150,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $O $O - $O _ $O I $O - $O �' $0 Date on mall Submitted ate last revised 2010 Street Surface Repairs Project g Y Unfunded Project 6/25/2007 06/25/2007 Last printed TR 74...... Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Gas Tax l $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0 - $0 Measure M i. $0 $0 $0 $80,000 _ $0 $0 -_ ...._ $o - $0 _ _ - $0 $0 ....... - $0 _ $0_ $o $o $o $o $o $o $o $o $o $0 $o $o $15,000 $0 $0 $115,000 $10,000 $10,000 _.$0_._ $0 $150,000 Funding sources through FY 2013 $70,000 $80,000 - -$0 ...... $0 $0 . _ - Total Sources $0] $0 $0 $150,000 $0� $0 $150,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $O $O - $O _ $O I $O - $O �' $0 Date on mall Submitted ate last revised 2010 Street Surface Repairs Project g Y Unfunded Project 6/25/2007 06/25/2007 Last printed TR 74...... Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project ri I ProjectName 2010 Street Rehabilitation Project 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Description Overlay or reconstruction of various streets in accordance with City's Pavement Management Program. Design phase is expected to begin in Fall 2010 with bid and construction in Spring /Summer 2011. Justification This ongoing program is needed to maintain the streets in good condition. (Category Project No. ICIP No. Transportation TR -75 Project Location -_ - TBD Land Costs Department Lead Project Manager In current FY TBD TBD work Juan _ - - -- _Project Status: $0 Not in current work plan $0 FundingSources: $0 Design /Engineering $0 $0 I $0 $90,000 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 ', $0 $0 $970,000 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $0 $0 - $95,000 _ $0 Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 -$0 $95,000 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 ( $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 ' $0 it $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 1 $0 $90,000 1, $1,160,000 $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES - -$0 $0 $0 $0 i -- $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 ;Gas Tax I $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 $0 ;Measure M $0 $0 -. $0 $0 $240,000 - -_ j $0 p - $0 ;Pro 42 $0 $0 $440,000 _ $440,000 $0 - I $0 - -$0 $0 $0 $0 i -- $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $970,000 $95,000 - $95,000 $0 $0 $1,250,000 Funding sources through FY 2013 $130,000 $240,000 $880,000 __$0 $0 Total Sources ( $0 $0 $0 $440,000 $810,000 $0 $1 250,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 _ $0 $350,000) $350,000 $0 $0 ate originally submitted Date last revised 2010 Street Rehabilitation Protect Unfunded Project Last printed TR 75 6/25/2007 06/25/2007 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNa..me $0 $0 $0 Category - ]Prolect No. �CIP No. ..... .... _ _ - -- Dowdell Avenue Extension Improvements $0 Total Sources I Transportation $0 $0 ( :TR-76 Description GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O $0 Project Location $0 $0 $0 Public improvements to Dowdell Avenue Extension as part of redevelopment of Dowdell Ave. Ext, vicinity of former Stadium Unfunded I roject former Crushers Stadium property Date on mall submitted �,g Y_ -- Date last revised Department Lead Project Manager In current FY Last printed TR, 76...... TBD TBD work plan i .' (Project Status: Not in current work plan Justification FuntlutgSources: Redevelopment of the stadium area represents a major commercial and residential infill opportunity Redevelopment TOTA:and ROJ[' C'I COST (Desig Construction) Amount unfunded 00,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -1I FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs tl„ rough FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $0- -$0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 — Improvements $0 - - $700,000 $0 i' $0 $0 _ - -- $0 ..... .... ..... $700,000 - Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 - ...._ . Contingencies $0 $0 $0 i' $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design / $0 $700,000 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $700,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Fundingsources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 ,Redevelopment Fund $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 Total Sources I $0 1 $700,000 $0 $0 ( $0 $0 $700,000 !. GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 Unfunded I roject Dowdell Avenue Extension Improvements .. Date on mall submitted �,g Y_ -- Date last revised __ Last printed TR, 76...... 6/20/2008 06/20/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project Description ProjectName Water Main Improvement Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Construct approximately 1.6 miles of water distribution pipelines from eight to sixteen inches in diameter. Construct pressure regulating stations to regulate transmission system pressure down to distribution system pressure. (Formerly called "System Distribution Improvements ") .Justification the project will improve pressures and fire flows for existing residents and the Category -[Project No. (CIP No. - - - pipelines are sized to accommodate new development as well. Public Facilities Financing Plan; 2005 Water Revenue Bond TOTAL PROJIsC`T COST - -- - (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $2,235,300 $0 DESIGNICONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 thproject costs rough FY 2013 Design /Engineering $162,183 $0 II $0 $0 $0 $0 $162,183 Land Costs - $0 - $0 - - $0 $0 - - $0 - - _ $0 $0 Buildings $0 I $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $p $0 Improvements $0 -..._ $0 r$2 073,117 $0 - .............. $0 $0 .._........ $2,073,117 - Inspections /Cm $0 $0 ii $0 - $0 - $0 $0 - $0 Contingencies $0 $0 ) - $0 -$0 - $0 $0 -$0- Sales Tax $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $162,183 $0 I $2,073,117 $0 I - $0 $0 $2,235,300 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding soil rces FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 PEEP $0 $0 $1,958,700 $0 $0 $0 $1,958,700 ;Revenue Bond $276,600 _ $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $276,600 -- l $0 -_ $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -. - $0 - $0 - $0 _ $� - -$0 - $0 $0 - $� �. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Sources $276 600 l $0 $1,958,700 $0 I $0 $0 $2,235,300 GAP FUNDING NEEDED ($114,417) $0 $114,417 $0 $0 $p - $0 Date originally submitted Date last revised Unfunded Project Water Main Improvement Project 3/23/2001 06/02/2008 Last printed WA-04__ - Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Proect P i l j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProlectName (Category (Project No. ICIP No. .......... - Water Storage Tanks 3 & 4 Interior Recoating Project Water Systems 12005 -01 WA -12 - — Description -- Project Location $0 Recoat interior surfaces of steel water tank. Water Storage Tank #3 $0 Buildings Departinent Lead Project Manager In current FY $D P. Barnes P Barnes , work plan ' $0 (Project Status: - - -- Design in progress; project on hold. $0 Justification - -- - The aggressive soils in Rohnert Park cause corrosion on the buried portions of FunclrngSources: $0 steel water tanks. This recoating project will extend the life of the water storage Water operations fund $0 tanks. Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 1' COS "i' - $0 $0 Sales Tax ruction) Amount [(:Resign :$3:62,518 unfunded $0 $0 $30 000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated t, FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $32,518 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 ,I $D $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $330,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 . ........ - - $0 a $0 $0 $0 $0 - Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax __ ........ ............ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,518 $0 $0 $330,000 $0 $0 $0 - -$0 Total Design/ $32,518 $330,000 - $0 $0 - $0 $0 I $362,518 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 i Water operations I $32,518 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - $0 - -- $0 $0 $0 $0 - -__ $0 -- I $0- $0 - $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - -_ $0 I $0 :' $0 $0 I $0 1 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $332,518 $0 $0 - -$o. ..............__..______. -. $0 Total Sources I $32,518 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $332,518 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 - - Water Storage Tanks 3 & 4 Interior Recoating Project Date on mall s- ubmite r Date last revised 1 Project Last printed WA 12 Unfunded 10/15/2001 06/02/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project �°� 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 P►ojectName (Category Pt oject No ICIP No. Water Model Study Update Water Systems WA -16 - - Description 2008 -09 - Project Location FY 2010 -11 Confirm water demand projections and update model as necessary. N/A Water operations - I $0 $0 - $0 Department Lead Project Manager In current FY I -- $0 $O D. Jenkins TBD work plan $0 $O (Project Status: -- _; $0 $0 _ Not in current work plan $0 Justification $0 $0. _. . Because water demands were estimated without the benefit of metered data, it is Funding Sout ces: $0 - - necessary to confirm the water demand projections and update the model with Water operations fund $0 accurate data as necessary. $0 I $0 TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $100.000 I - -- $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 II I; FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -1I FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 thproject costs rough EY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 ! $100,000 Land Costs $0 $0 $p $0 $O - $0 - $0 Buildings $0 I $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 '', $0 _ $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 -- $0 " $0 $0 $0 $0 - - Contingencies $0 $0 - - j $0 - $0 $0 'i $0 - - $0 - - - Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ -- Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 - $0 $0 $100,000 ( $0 $0- $100,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Water operations - I $0 $0 - $0 $100,000 $0 I -- $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $O $o $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0. $0 $0 - $0 -_ $0 - - $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 I $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $100,000 $0 $0 -$0_ $0 - - -- - - - - Total Sources ( $0 l $0 $0 $100,000 1 $0 I $0 $100,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 -- $0 — $0 L $0 $0 $0 Date originally submitted Date last revised Water Model Study Update -_ _I Unfunded Project Last printed WA 16 2/25/2004 05/05/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project Description rrojectivame ......... . - -_. Recycled Water System Expansion 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Description Expand the recycled water system including transmission, storage and site retrofits in accordance with the updated Incremental Recycled Water Master Plan (IRWMP) being developed by City of Santa Rosa. Justification Project will serve new development's recycled water needs and implement cost Categol y Project No. IC-111P, No. effective recycled water projects to avoid water system expansion. Public Facilities Financing Plan, SCWA LRT2 Funding sources 11 1 FY 2008 -09 TOTAL PROJECT COST FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through EY 2013 PEEP _ J $0 $0 $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $914,000 SCwA LRT2 $0 $0 $0 $649,629 $0 $1,563,629 $649,629 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 Estimated $0 _ $0 $0 _ $0 $$ $0 $0 l project costs $0 $0 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 ) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 ) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $1,563,629 $0 $0 $0 $1,563,629 $0 Inspections /CM $0 ........ $0 !� $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $O I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 �- $0 $0 $0 - $0 - $0 — Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 1 $0 I $0 $1,563,629 $0 $0 $1,563,629 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources 11 1 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through EY 2013 PEEP _ J $0 $0 $0 $914,000 _- $0 $0 $914,000 SCwA LRT2 $0 $0 $0 $649,629 $0 $0 $649,629 $0 $0 -- $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $o $0 _ $0 $0 _ $0 $$ $0 $0 l $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Sources f $0 $0 $0 $1,563,629 $ $0 $1,563,629 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $O $0 $0 $0 L $0 __ $0 ! _ $0 Date originally submitted Date last revised , Recycled Water System Expansion 3122/2004 04/21/2008 Project Last printed WA 20 Unfunded Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM ® 1 j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName _. (Category Protect _ No ICIP No. Water Storage Tanks 1, 3 & 4 Exterior Painting Project _.. Water Systems WA -23 Description 2008 -09 Project Location FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 Repaint exterior surfaces of water storage tanks Water operations $0 Water storage tanks #1, #3, #4 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 Department Lead Project Manager In current FY - $0 $0 P. Barnes P Barnes $O- work plan $0 $0 (Project Status: $0 $0 $0 $0 Not in current work plan $0 $0 Justification $0 $0 $0 $0 Water storage lank exteriors ie uiie ie aintini g q p' gas routine maintenance to protect FundingSout ces r __._.._... steel from deterioration. "tank surfaces will be prepared and if necessary repaired Water operations prior to be repainted Costs will be considerably less if existing lead paint is not present. Tank 1 - 5280 sq feet / Tank 3 - 4474 sq feet / Tank 4 - 4474 sq feet. T PROJECT I AST and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 ii $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 H $620 000 $0 $0 $0 $620,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 i $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 Contingencies $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 _ $0 $60,000 - Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ! $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Water operations $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 __ $0 - $0 $0 $0 $O- _ $0 $0 $0 __$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -_ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 I $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Sources I — $0 I $0 $800,000 $0 I $0 $0 $800 000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 _ $0 __ $0 ___ $0 $o-_ $0... Date originally submitted Date last revised Water Storage Tanks 1, 3 & 4 Exterior Painting Prole Unfunded Project 3/3/2006 06/20/2008 Last printed WA 23._.. Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project Description ProjectName Water System Valve Relocation - Wilfred @ Hwy 101 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Description Water utility relocations adjacent to Roberts Lake Road and Redwood Avenue Justification The Wilfred Avenue Interchange project by Caltrans will affect the City -owned Category FY 2009 -10 Project No (CIP No. Water Systems AL PROJECT COST 2006-17 WA -25 Project Location $0 $0 $0 - ;Roberts Lake Road, Redwood Ave $0 Department Lead Project Nlanager In current FY P. Barnes 11P. Barnes work plan (Project Status: $0 - $0 $0 Design FundingSources: water utilities in the vicinity, necessitating their relocation. The relocation provides Caltrans (reimbursement) an opportunity to improve the performance of the water distribution system at this node. FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 AL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 ign L and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $233,195 - $0 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 $0 , $0 1 $0 rstimated ' FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $46,000 $6,719 l $0 t $0 $0 $0 $52,719 Land Costs _ $0 - $0 .i -- $0 -$0 __ _ _ $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $125,868 ,j $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,868 Inspections /CM $0 $54,608 I $0 $0 $0 -- $0 -- $54,608 _ _ Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 $0 - $0 $0 __$0__ Sales Tax $0 _.._. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ _......... $46,000 $187,195 I $0 $0 I $0 $0 $233,195 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Caltrans ( $0 $233,195 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 -_ $0 $0 - $0 - - J $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $p I $0 $0 $0 , $0 1 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $233,195 - -_ $0 $0 - $0 - -$0 Total Sources [ $ i $233,195 $0 $� $0 $0 $233,195 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $46,000 ($46,000 - $0 $0 I- -$0 - $0 i $0 rDate on mall SUI)ntitte(1 Date last revised Water System Valve Relocation Wilfred @ Hwy 101 I g y Unfun(led Project Last printed WA-25 5/5/2008 05/05/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project ri i - ProjectName .......... Water Storage Tank #8 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Description Construction of water storage tank located east of Petaluma Hill Road to include water tank, 12 -inch and 16 -inch water transmission mains, a 16 -inch recycled water main, and an access road. Justification Water tank will provide potable water storage for future development in University Category IP►oject No. ICIP No. Design /Engineering $0 $20,000 $475,000 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 - $0 - -$0 - - $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0_ Improvements $0 $0 $3,300 000 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $495,000 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 - $0 -- $330,000 -- $0 $0 $0 - Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 - - -- - -- $0 Other Expenses $26,471 $0 $0 $0 $0 -0 $0 $495,000 -$0 $0 $3,300,000 $495,000 $330,000 _ $0 $26,471 Total Design/ $26,471 $20,000 1$4,600,000 $0 I $0 $0 $4,646,471 Coils h•uction FUNDING SOURCES Fundingsources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Developer I $0 $20,000 $4,626,471 $0 $0 i $0 $4,646,471 _ $0 ,_ _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p - $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 i $0 .... $0 _ $0 $0 _ $0 $0 - $0 _ $0 $0 - $0 ( $0 $0 $0 I $0 1 $0 $0 Total Sources $0 $20,000 $4,626 471 $0 I $0 $0 $4,646,471 GAP FUNDING NEEDED ( $26,471 $0 ($26,471) -$0 - $0 $0._. $0 Date originally submitted ate last ►evised water storage Tank as Unfunded Project - -_ Last printed wA 26 - Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category Protect No �CIP No Eastslde Sewer Project Phase 1 Wastewater Systems 2004 -05 WW -07 Description Project Location Wastewater main varying from 12 -48 " in diameter. Phase 1 route starts at pump Redwood Drive, from pump station (J. Rogers) to Avram Ave. station and south along Redwood BI., and then diverts under 101 to Avram Ave. Phase 2 route includes Snyder Lane from East Cotati to RPX then along Department Lead .Project Manager p g In current FY Southwest BI, Alicia St. and connects at Avram Ave. D. Jenkins D Jenkins work plan VI: through FY 2013 (Project Status: $6,734,206 Justification Construction completion expected in summer 2008 - -- — -- The wastewater main is needed to correct identified deficiencies in the collection Fun(IIIIgSources $0 system and carry a portion of the existing system flows. Because this project will Public Facilities Financing Plan, sewer service charges also support system demand created by infll projects in the redevelopment area, developer deposits $0 redevelopment gap funding is being initially provided until Public Facilities Fee is $0 $0 collected to repay the redevelopment funding. .'Developer deposits p p J $1,446,794 $0 TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 _._. $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $13,817,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated FY 2008 -09 F Y 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Project costs th rough FY 2013 Design /Engineering $1,425,119 ! $27,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,452,494 Land Costs _ $31,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,000 _ Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 Improvements $6,077,516 $2,851,552 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,929,068 Inspections /CM $508,643 $2,248,876 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,757,519 _. - Contingencies $0 $570,004 $0 $0 $0 $0 $570,004 Sales Tax $0 $0 .... $0 . _. $0 $0 $0 _ $0 ` -....- Other Expenses $46,916 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,916 Total Design/ $8,089,193 $5,727,807 j $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,817,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 PEEP I $6,734,206 $4,077,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,811,206 Sewer service charges $1,559,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,559,000 .'Developer deposits p p J $1,446,794 $0 $0 $0 _._. $0 $0... $1,446,794 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 _ $0 __ $0 $0 $o - $o $0 $o $o $o Total Sources $9,740,000 $4,077,000 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $13,817,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $1,650,807) $1,650,807 $Q $0 I $Q $Q $0 DatC originally submitted I Date last t CvisCd 1 Eastside Sewer_Project Phase 1 I I Project 3/22/2004 06/20/2008 Last printed WV -07 ........... IIfU tIdC(1 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project i ti ProjectName Sewer Rehabilitation Old Pipeline to Santa Rosa 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Description Inspect and rehabilitate 30 year old sewer pipeline between Rohnert Park and Santa Rosa Subregional Sewerage Plant on Llano Road Justification New oaiallel sewer uiueliiie was desiaried to be used in conjunction rehabilitated Not in current work plan FundingSources: Buildings $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,100,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Contingencies $0 $0 ,I $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 it $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 - $0 A $0 $0 1 - $0 $5,000,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 PFFP I $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 1 $2,500,000 -_ Sewer service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $0 - —� $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0- $0 I $0 $0 $0 l $0 I $0 $0 $4,100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 Funding sources through FY 2013 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 Total Sources $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5 000 000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I - $0 $0 — $0 $0 ( _ $0 $0 $0 III Date originally SUhmittecl Date last revised Sewer Rehabilitation Old Pipeline to Santa Rosa g Y Unfunded Project Last printed ww 08.... .. 3/3/2006 05/05/2008 Friday, ,tune 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM ® j 5 -Year Capital Imp►ovement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category 1 Pro,lect No ICIP No. ....... Sewer Pipeline Replacement Wastewater Systems FY 2008 -09 WW 10 _._ ..... ------ ---- - -- - - Description Project Location FY 2012 -13 Replacement program of existing sewer pipelines throughout the City, in Citywide $600,000 accordance with a capital program recommended by the Sewer System Department Lead Project Manager Lt current FY Management Plan. P. Barnes :P. Barnes work plan $0 (Project Status: $0 $0 Not in current work plan $0 Justification - .... Many of existing pipelines in the City's sewer collection system have reached their Fu►ttli►tgSout ces _ useful life of 40 -50 years. As part of the Sewer System Management Plan that Sewer service charges the City will develop as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, a capital improvements program for the collection system will also be developed, identifying pipelines to be replaced over time. TOTAL PROJECT COST` (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $6,200,000 000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $° $° $° Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $600,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $6,200,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .............. Sales Tax $0 $0 ,; $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 ! $0 $0 ! $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $600,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 I $1,400,000 $1,400,000 I $6,200,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Sewer service charges I $0 $600,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $6,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $o $o $o $o $o $o- $o _ $0 $0 $0 $o $o _ $0 _ $0 $o $o $o $0 - $o $o $° Total Sources ( $0 $600,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 000 $6 200 000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $o _ $0 $0 i _ $0 $0 I $0 _.Date originally Submitted Date last ►CVISed Sewer Pipeline Replacement g Y Unfunded Project 11 11 Last printed VAN-10_._ 5/11/2007 05/05/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName Category Project No. �CIP No Eastside Sewer Project - Phase 2 _ Wastewater Systems 2007 -02 WW -11 - Description - - -- - Project Location . _. _.... Wastewater main varying from 12 -48 " in diameter. Phase 2 route includes Snyder Avram Ave, Santa Alicia Ave.,Southwest Blvd to Snyder Ln. Lane from East Cotati to RPX then along Southwest BI, Santa connecting at Avram Ave. Alicia Ave. and Department Lead Project 11ana er p je lit current FY PFFP $7,817 $0 D Jenkins work plan $0 $0 ! IPr'oject Status: $0 _ ......... $0 Designed On hold. $0 Justification $0 $0 $p The wastewater main is needed to serve new development on the east side of FtrntlrngSotrt ces - $0 town because adequate capacity is not available in the existing main. Public Facilities Financing Plan _ $0 _ $0 $0 TOTAL PROJECT COST - $0 $0 $0 ! (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 I $0 $11,207 817 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 ugh costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $7,817 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,817 Land Costs $0 $p I $0 $0 $t) $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 !7 $0 ;$11,200,000 $0 $0 $11,200,000 Inspections/CM $0 $0 __:I $0 $0 $0 $0 ! _ _ $0 Contingencies $0 $0 ( $0 -$0 _ $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -- .� - -- - -- - - - _.. Other Expenses $0 $0 j $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $7,817 $0 !I $0 611,200,000 $0 $0 $11,207,817 Construction FUNDING SOURCES _ Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 PFFP $7,817 $0 $0 ;$11,200,000 $0 $0 ! $11,207,817 $0 $0 $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $0 -$0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 _ $0 _ $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 ! $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 Total Sources [ $7,817 $0 $0 $11,200,000 l $ $0 $11,207,817 GAP FUNDING NEEDED ( _ $O $O - $O -$Q I $0 $Q $0 Date originally submitted Date last revised Eastside Sewer Project Phase 2 Unfunded Project 5/20/2008 6/20/2008 Last printed WW- 11.,__ Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category IProject No. ICIP No. _..... Inflow & Infiltration Reduction Program Wastewater Systems 12007 -12 W-12 W Description Project Location $0 A series of projects to reduce rainwater and groundwater infiltration into the sewer 'Citywide $0 system. Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 P. Barnes P. Barnes work !✓', $0 IProject Status: _plan _ _ Manhole project is designed $100,000 Justification -- - $0 I The additional non - wastewater flows from rainwater and groundwater into the Furt(IrrtgSour ces - $0 sewer collection system result in additional operating costs at the City's pumping Sewer operations $0 station and the Subregional Treatment Plant. The additional flow can also i $0 $0 approach the limits of conveyance capacity in the City's sewers and pump station. $0 .. Sales Tax $0 TO "1'AL PROJECT COST $0 $0 (Design and Construction) Arnount unfunded Other Expenses $500,000 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated ,-,' FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 tl„ project costs Design /Engineering $0 $0 ',1 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $100,000 ',� $100 000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 .. Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $100,000 I $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 I $500,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 !Sewer operations $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 _ _j . $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ _ l $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $o _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 _._.... _ � 000 $100,000 $100,000 I $100,Total Sources $ $500,000 j GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O $O $O $O L $O $0 c $0 Date originally submitted Date last revised Inflow & Infiltration Reduction Program Unfunded Project Last printed wW -12 — Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:35 PM ® j j _5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category Project No. ICIP No. Type 1 Fire Truck (for west side public safety facility) -13 Major Equipment 'EO -03 Description -$0 Project Location $350,000 Fire truck for West Side Public Safety Facility is needed $0 $0 n/a $0 $0 -- l $0 $0_ _ Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0- - $0 TBD TBD work plan,___. $0 $0 (Project Status: -- $o $o - _ Unfunded $0 Justification $0 $350,000 $0 $0 Increased call demand, reduce response times to high risk facilities, provide FundutgSources $0 $400,000 response to major economic revenue sources for city $0 Funding per FIGR MOU Date originally submitted Date last revised _ � Type 1 Fire Truck (for west side public safety facility) Last p► inted 'EQ-03 .... Unfunded Project 1/26/2004 05/25/2008 - TOTAL PROJECT COST Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:30 PM (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded - $750,000 $400,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 .I $0 $0 $0 $0 _ ..__$0 Land Costs $0 $0 -- $0 -$0 $0 $0 -$0 Buildings $0 $0 .I $0 $0 j $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 f $0 $0 $0 $° $0 Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ... ......... Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 , L ......... $0 $0 $0 _ $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $750,000 $0 $0 $750,000 Total Design/ $0 $0- $0 $750,000 $0 $0 $750,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 FIGR MOU $o $0- - $0 $350,000 -$0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -- l $0 $0_ _ $0 $0 -_ $0 - - $0- - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -_$0 -- $o $o $o - $o ( $o $° $0 Total Sources ( $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000 Date originally submitted Date last revised _ � Type 1 Fire Truck (for west side public safety facility) Last p► inted 'EQ-03 .... Unfunded Project 1/26/2004 05/25/2008 - !� Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:30 PM Project 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 PtojectName (Category IPlojectNo. ICIPNo. Public Works Corporation Yard Asphalt Repair Other Facilities Land Costs - ;OF -30 Description Project Location -$0 Regular repair and replacement of corporation yard, parking lot and driveway Corporation Yard (600 Enterprise Drive) Buildings asphalt Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 M. Bracewell TBD work plan,__! - - -- Improvements (Project Status: $0 - - Unfunded $0 Justification -- $0 Corporation yard asphalt is in desperate need of attention, repairs must be made P'unchng,Sources: $0 to prevent further damage to base rock and to provide a safe working Water operations, sewer operations, General Fund environment for employees $0 - $0 - - $0 -- I 'IAL1'ROJLCI COST $0 Sales Tax (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $261,500 $0 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Other Expenses - Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 IM t t ; t "•Oj ct costs throw h FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs - $0 - $0 $� -$0 $0 - $0 Buildings $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 - - -- Improvements $0 $0 [--$_2 6-11 500 - -: - - — - $0 — $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 ! $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 - $0 - $0 - - $0 -- $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 ...... $0 $0 Other Expenses - $0 $0 - $0 -_ $0 - $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $261,500 $0 $0 $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Water operations I $0 $0 $87,166 $0 $0 $0 .Sewer operations $0 - $0 - $87,167 $0 - -_ $0 - $0 General Fund $0 -- - -- $0 $87,167 $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 _ -$0 -_ $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0- Total Sources $0 $0 $261,500 $0 $0 ( $0 $0 - - -$0 $0 $261,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,500 Funding sources through FY 2013 $87,166 $87,167 $87,167 - $0 $0 $261,500 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O — $O ! $0 -$0 - $0 $0. $0 1114C-9 n mall submitted Date last revised Public Works Corporation Yard Asphalt Repair Y Unfunded Project 3/3/2006 05/16/2007, Last printed of 30 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName Category Protect No �CIP No. Northern Fire Station Interior Upgrade Other Facilities Land Costs OF -s4 -- - ------- Description Project Location $0 Complete interior remodel and installation of fire protection sprinkler system to N. Fire Station Buildings bring building up to code. , Department Lead Project oject Manager In current FY $0 TBD TBD work plan i Improvements (Project Status: _. _. -- ,Unfunded $0 Justification-- - - ---------------------------- - ---------- ................ $0 The Northern Fire Station was built in 1972 and has undergone two minor interior FundmgSout ces $0 upgrades over the past 20 years. There is currently no fire sprinkler protection Unfunded Contingencies system in the building. The remodel will include installation of energy efficient $0 $7,500 upgrades to include skylights, energy efficient appliances and other solutions to $0 $0 .,go green ". The exterior of the building and the landscaping was upgraded in C7`COST .. 2006 -2007, to include metal siding and xeriscaping for water conservation. The __$0 - -- — $0 roof of structure is nearing the end of it lifetime and will also need to be replaced. =(Design struction) Amount un funded $0 I 0 $500,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated � FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 I I ; tlproject costs u•ough FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 i $375,000 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $7,500 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 _ $0 $0 __$0 - -- — $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $100,000 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 I $500,000 $0 $0 $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 .General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0- _ $0 $0 ;. $0 $0 J $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $7,500. . $7,500 $0 $100,000 $500,000 Funding sources through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $500,000 $0 I $0 $0 I $500,000 Date originally submitted Date last revised--- evised , Northern Fire Station Interior Upgrade _....... Unfunded Project Last printed of 3a 3/20/2007 04/21/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Proiect j j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNaine ......... - Parks, Bikepath, and Point -of- Interest Wayfinding & Signage Description Design and implementation, including installation, of a signage and wayfinding program to provide design identity, consistency, clear directional communication for points of interest in Rohnert Park, including park locations, bike and walking paths, and other local and regional destinations in the City. .Justification (Project Status: :Unfunded Sales Tax FundingSpu► Ces $0 f $0 The City's parks and recreational facilities lack basic Identification signs. $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 Entrances and access to the bike and walking path network, which includes Unfunded $0 $0 $0 creekside paths, is not clearly marked. Directional signs to the City's destinations FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 and points -of- interest are few, haphazard, and lack a consistent and unified through FY 2013 - $0 $0 _ $0 design identity. The development and implementation of a signage and TOTAL PROJECT COST $ $0 wayfinding program would address the above - mentioned issues as well as help (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded shape the community image of Rohnert Park. $0 $0 $0 - - -- - $0 -_ $0 $0 $100,000 $0__ $100,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 $0 $0 Estimated $0 $0 $0 I $0 project costs FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 II $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Land Costs - _ $0 $0 - _ $0 $0 $0 $0 _- $0 Buildings $0 $0 !i $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 ) $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies - $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 f $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $O i $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -_ Total Design/ $0 $O ( $100,000 $0 I $0 $0 F I $100,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 - $0 $0 _ $0 _ __$0 - $0 $ $0 �. $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 - - $0 $0 $0 - - -- - $0 -_ $0 $0 $0 $0__ $0 - _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 _ $0 Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $100,000 $0 I - $0 $0 $100,000 ate originally submitted Date last t evised Unfunded Project Parks, Bikepath, and Point-of-Interest Wayfindmg & __. ........._ Last printed of -41 6/1/200$ 06/01/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project Description ProjectName Sports Center Air Conditioning System Description Replace air conditioning system for the Center. 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Justification Numerous customer complaints and staff concerns over the years indicates a Unfunded FundingSources: need to install this system. The interior temperature of this uncooled facility can Unfunded FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 reach 85 -90 degrees and could be unsafe for use. $0- $0 _ $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0__ _ $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $0 $0. $0 $0 $570,000 $0 $570,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 i': $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $o $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $500 000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingencies $0 $0 ( $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Sales Tax $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $570,000 $0 $0 $p $570,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 $0 $0- $0 _ $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0__ _ $0 $0 $0 _ $0 . $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0. $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 I $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 _$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _. l Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $570,000 $0 $0 $0 $570,000 Date originally SUhnlltted Date last revised Sports Center Air Conditioning System ig y r _.._ 1 Unfunded Project Last printed PR-06_ 3/28/2001 03/11/2004 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Progratn -FY 08 -09 to FY ,12 -13 ProjectName Category Project No. ICIP No. Skateboard Park- Permanent Parks and Recreation 2003 -23 PR -21 -- -- -- - -- - -- Description Project Location 15,000 square -foot facility skateboard park with concrete surfaces, ramps and TBD other street - course features, fencing, signage, security lighting and irrigation. Department Lead Project Nlanager In current FY G. Miller TBD work-plan (Project Status: l .. Justification Unfunded Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan (April 2008), 6 -year , FunchngSources Capital Improvements Plan. Unfunded TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded j $2,000,000 $2,000,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 thproject costs rough FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $O I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 I $0 I $0 $0 $0 $p $0 _. Improvernents $0 $0 $0 — -- $2,000,000 $0 -- $0 — -- $2,000,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 ( $0 -$0 $o $0 _ $0 _ Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 .! $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 I $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES _ founding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ',� $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 Total Sources $0 I $0 $0 $0 $— $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED i $� $0 $0 $2,000,000 I $0 $0 $2,000,000. •. Date originally submitted Date last revised Skateboard Park Permanent Unfunded Project _. _ _ 9/24/2003 05/05/2008 Last printed PR 21 _ _ Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:33 PM Project I ProjectName ADA Improvements to Parks 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Description Installation of ramps, paths and other site improvements at and around playgrounds to address path -of- travel issues Justification Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (Category IProject No. ICIP No. Parks and Recreation I PR -47 Project Location Unfunded :Various parks Funding sources Department Lead Project N'lanager In current FY G. Miller TBD work plan IProject Status: _ Unfunded $0 __ FundingSources: .1.1.11.... .11.1.1. Total Design / $0 $0 $145,000 $0 I $0 $0 Construction $145,000 FUNDING SOURCES Unfunded Funding sources i FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 TOTAL PROJECT COST - $0 $0 $0 $0- -_ $0_ $0 $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $0 $0 - $0 - $0 $145,000 $0 $145,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 $0 $0 $0 Estimated $0 $0 t t ; FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Land Costs $0 - $0- $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $O I $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $100,600 $0 $0 $0 - - -__- $100,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingencies -$0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Sales Tax $0 $0 - $0 _$0 $0 $0 _ $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design / $0 $0 $145,000 $0 I $0 $0 Construction $145,000 FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources i FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 - $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0- -_ $0_ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .1111. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 — - — — Total Sources $0....1 $� - - $0 $0 — $0 - _ $0- $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 $0 $145,000 $0 l $0 $0 $145,000 Date originally submitted Date last revised 1 ADA Improvements to Parks .. .1 a11.1 Unfunded Project Last printed PR -47 5/31/2006 04/21/2008 �.'' Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project I 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNarne [Category (Project No ICIP No. Callinan Sports & Fitness Center Painting Parks and Recreation I PR -51 Description FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 Project Location through FY 2013 Repainting of building exterior and locker rooms $0 $0 Sports & Fitness Center (5405 Snyder Lane) $0 $0 $0 $0 Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 $0 $0 $0 G. Miller TBD work Ian $0 - $0 $0 (Project Status: _ - Justification _ I $0 Not in current work plan - $0 The exterior paint is cracking and peeling. The underlying wood is decaying due FuntlirrgSour'ces: -_ $0 0 to the lack of paint protection. The interior of the locker rooms has had numerous Unfunded $0 patches and is in need of repainting. $0 j $p_ _ $p Total Sources i I'0T"AC I'ROJGCT COST $0 ] $0 - $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded - $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 .... $180,000 $180,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 I $0 $0 $180,000 Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs uli-ongh FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 $p Land Costs $0 - $0 $0 _ $0 - $0 $0 - - $0 Buildings $0 I $0 j $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 _ $180,000 $0 $0 $0 ................ $180,000 .............. Inspections /CM $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - Contingencies $0 - - $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 -- $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 .......... $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 - $0 $180,000 $0 I $0 - $0 $180,000 Construction _ FUNDING SOURCES _ Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ I $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 I $0 -_ $0 0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 j $p_ _ $p Total Sources $0 ] $0 - $0 - $0 - $0 $0 - $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 $0 $180,000 $0 I $0 $0 $180,000 Unfunded Project Callinan Sports & Fitness Center Painting Date originally submitted Date last revised 7/16/2007 07/16/2007 Last printed PR 51 ...._..__.____ -_. _..... . - Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM ® j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Project Name $0 (Category 1poJect N0 CIP No. Community Center HVAC Replacement $0 Parks and Recreation — .------ ------- $0 PR -52 Description Inspections /CM Project Location $0 11 - Removal and replacement of old HVAC equipment $0 Community Center (5401 Snyder Lane) $0 - Contingencies $0 - Department lead Project Manager In current FY $0 - - $0 TBD ITBD work plan '. $0 $0 (Project Status: $0 $o __...__. $0 _ Not in current work plan $0 Justification $0 - $0 $0 FuncltttgSources: Existing equipment is worn and inefficient. Repairs and maintenance costs are beginning to exceed the value of the equipment. New equipment will be more Unfunded energy efficient and reduce operating costs. TOTAL PROJECT COST (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $55.000 $55,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs tl„-ongh FY 2013 Design /Engineering ! $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $p $0- a - $0 _ $0 - $� - $0 - $0- Buildings $0 I $0 j $0 i' $0 $0, $0 $0 Improvements - $0 - $0 $0 1 - $o - - -- - $o $0 $0 $55,000 — .------ ------- $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 - $0 11 - $0 - $0 $0 _ $0 - Contingencies $0 - $0 - $0 - $0 - - $0 - $0 - Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 .. $0 $o __...__. $0 _ Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 ( $55,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES $55,000 $0 $0 — $0 -- $0 $0 ( $0 $0 __ I $55,000 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 -- $ - $0 - $0 $0 1 - $o $0 -- $o $o $0 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 - - $0 - $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 - - $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 Total Sources [ $0 1 $0 $0 $0 - GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $55,000 Date originally submitted Date last t evised Community Center HVAC Replacement -_ _ Unfunded Project 7/16/2007 07/16/2007 Last printed PR 52 . Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -1.3 ProjectName (Category Project No. ICIP No. .. .. Community Center Mechanical Enclosure Re -Roof ;Parks and Recreation ! PR -53 Description 2008 -09 Project Location - FY2010 -11 Re -roof the mechanical systems enclosure located on the Community Center roof. :Community Center (5401 Snyder Lane) - $0 $0 Department Lead Project Manager In current FY 1 $0 $0 G. Miller TBD work tlan $0 $0 (Project Status: -_ $p - -- Not in current work plan $0 Justification $0 - I $0 $0 The enclosure that contains the Community Center's mechanical systems is Fu ntlingSottrces: $0 I damaged and has existing leaks. Water collects in this enclosure, which is Unfunded $0 located directly above the new restrooms being constructed with the Community $0 Center ADA Improvements and Truss Repair Project. Continued leakage may damage the new improvements. PROJECT COST' [(Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $74,000 $74,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 ti I; FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -1 I FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 th t" ro ugh costs FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,000 Land Costs - $0 $0 I - $0 $0 $o $0 -_ - $O Buildings $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 F 50,000 ;': $0 $0 $0 $50,000 .................... Inspections /CM $0 $0 a $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,000 Contingencies - $0 $0 -; $10,000 $0 $0 $0 - -- _' $10,000 _ Sales Tax $0 $0 — — $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 I $74,000 $0 - _ $0 $0 $74,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -_ $p $0 - $0 $0 $0 -- $0- $0 - I $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 Total Sources $0 , - $0 $0 _ -$0 I ._.._. $0 - $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $74,000 $0 $0 $0 $74,000 rr Date originally submitted Date last revised Community Center Mechanical Enclosure Re Roof L ,,,..:. .............. Unfunded Project Last printed PR 53 7/17/2007 07/17/2007 ✓' Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description P►ojectName Boller Replacement - Sports Center Description Replacement of boiler in sports center 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Justification Existing equipment is worn and inefficient. Repairs and maintenance costs are Not in current work plan FundingSources: beginning to exceed the value of the equipment. New equipment will be more Unfunded energy efficient and reduce operating costs. Design /Engineering $0 $0 i; $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 _ $0 .i $0 _ _$0 $0 $0 '. Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 Improvements $0...... $0 $65,000 ..................... _' $0 - $0 $0 - Inspections/CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 1 $0 - $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES ... Total Sources I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 $0 $0- $0 $0 $65,000 Funding, Sources through FY 2013 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O $O $65,000 $O L $O $O $65,000 Date originally submitted Date last revised Boiler Replacement - SportsCenter Unfunded Project 1. Last printed PR-54___, 5/9/2008 05/09/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 is $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0. $0 $0 __ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 I _ $0 $0 ... Total Sources I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 $0 $0- $0 $0 $65,000 Funding, Sources through FY 2013 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $O $O $65,000 $O L $O $O $65,000 Date originally submitted Date last revised Boiler Replacement - SportsCenter Unfunded Project 1. Last printed PR-54___, 5/9/2008 05/09/2008 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName $0 Category Project No. CIP No. Year Round Sports Turf $0 Parks and Recreation $0 PR -55 Description Project Location 2.5 acre, year -round sport turf facility to support one championship soccer field TBD and one combination baseball /softball field. Department Lead Project Alanager In current FY G. Miller TBD work plan _! (Project Status: _ - Justification - -- Not in current work plan Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan (April 2008), 6 -year r undrng...... s: Capital Improvements Plan. Unfunded 'O'r"' ECT COST (Design nstruction) Amount unfunded :PR 00 $1,728.000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 th project rough rough FY 2013 Design/Engincering ._ $0 $0 ( $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 _ I $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 i', $0 'I $0 $0 $0 -- Improveinents $0 $0 - -- $0 -- -- $0 $0 $1,728,000 - -- $1,728,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 '� $0 1 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0_.'I $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 Construction FUNDING SOURCES $0 —$0 -- $0 $0 ( $0 $0 $0 $1,728,000 $1,728,000 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - _ $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 _ $0 -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding sources through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 — - -- - - -- Total Sources $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $1,728,000 $1,728,000 rDate origi n Illy sub mitted Date last r'eVlSed r r Year -Round Sports Turf Project 5/5/2008 05/05/2008 Last printed PR 55 ... Unfunded P �'' Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project j j $ ° -_ 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Project Name $0 $0 Category JProject No. CIP No. Playground Replacement Program $o $o Parks and Recreation $° PR -56 Description - - - -- -- Project Location Annual program of replacing playground equipment, including fall material. iCity -wide Department Lead Project Nianager In current FY G. Miller G Miller work plan (Project Status: - - Not in current work plan Justification Regular replacement of playground equipment is necessary to comply with I urtdingSources: ._u .. -° playground safety standards and ADA, as well as reduce liability. Unfunded - TOTAL PROJECT CAST" (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $672,000 $672,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs - $0 $0 ,I -_ $0 ._ $0 $0 - $0 - $0 Buildings $0 $0 'j $0 ! $0 $0 $0 $0 — Improvements $0 — $168,000 $168,000 ..__ _ ... _ -- $168,000 -- $672,000 $0 $168 000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 !I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ........... Sales Tax $0 ... $0 . I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $168,000 $168,000 1 $168,000 $168,000 $672,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources � � � � • FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 1 through FY 2013 $0 $ ° -_ $° $0 $0 $0 l - $o - $0 $0 $o $o $o - $° $° $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 - $0 $0 $0 $° $° $0 $° $0 $0 $° $° Total Sources I $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 1 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED ( $0 $0 $168,000 $168,000 I $168,000 $168,000 $672,000 Date originally submitted Date last revised Playground Replacement Program Unfunded Project 5/5/2008 05105/2008 Last printed PR ss Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Proect tl 1 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNatne Category (Project No L...... IICIP No. L Passive Turf Area Funding sources Parks and Recreation ......... . ., PR -57 Description FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Project Location $0 ! $0 - 250' by 500' field providing space for citywide special events, festivals, multiple TBD $0 $0 sports and adjacent areas for passive recreation, picnickingand socilaizing. Department Lead Project ilIanager In current FY $0 $0 $0 - $0 G. Miller TBD work plan L_ $0 _ $0 _ $0 (Project Status: $0 —� - - - - - Not in current work plan $Q Total Sources I $0 Justification - $0 Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan (April 2008), 6 -year FuntlingSources: $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements Plan. $O $Q Unfunded. $Q $840,000 $$40,000 TOTAL PROJECT`COST Unfunded Project Passive Turf Area ...................................... ..... ............. Date on g Y omitted Da05/05/2008 ed (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded Last printed $840,000 $840,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 F Y 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 progh costs thro ugh FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 -.i $0 - -$0 $p $0 -$0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' $0 Improvements $0 $0 ;j $0 $0 $0 $840,000 $840,000 Inspections /CM $0 - $0 $0 ..... ......... $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies - -$0 $0 $0 - $p - _ $ $0 - $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 ......... ......... $0 ! $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ! $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $0 -$0 I $0 $840,000 $840,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 - $0 ! $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 '_ $0 $0 $0 $0- $0 $0 $0 - $0 _$0 $0 $0 _ $0 _ $0 $0 $0- $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $Q Total Sources I $0 $0 - $0 - $� $0 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $O $Q $Q I $Q $840,000 $$40,000 Unfunded Project Passive Turf Area ...................................... ..... ............. Date on g Y omitted Da05/05/2008 ed 5/5/21008 Last printed PR -57 ....... Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM ® j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category Project No. ICIP No. Dog Park ,Parks and Recreation FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 PR -58 Description $0 Project Location - $0 $0 $0 $0 2 -acre dog park with turf dog run (separate areas for small and large dogs); agility ;TBD $0 , $0 $0 course for dogs; drinking fountains, bench seating. $0 Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 __ $0 $0 G. Miller TBD work plan, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (Project Status: $0 _ $0 _ $0 $0 I $0 $0 -_- Not in current work plan Justification - $0 FunclrrlgSour ces - $0 $0 Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan (April 2008), 6 -year $0 $0 $0 $0 I Capital Improvements Plan. $600,000 on mall submitted Y � Unfunded Unfunded Project Dog Park _ .Date 5/5/2008 05/05/2008 TOTAL PROJECT COST Last printed PR 58 (Design and ('onstruction) Amount unfunded Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 $600,000 $600,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated project costs t ; FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .. Land Costs $0 $0 ( $0 -$0 $0 $0 - $0 _ Buildings $0 ( $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Impr-ovements $0 - - - - -- $0 - $0 - -- - - -- $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 ....... I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .' Sales Tax $0 $0 ..... I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Fu rid i n g so runes FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 $0 _ - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0_ I, $0 $0 , $0 $0 $0 j $0 $0 $0 ............ $0 ............ $0 $0 $0 __ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 _ $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 Total Sources ( - $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 _ $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $600,000 $600,000 on mall submitted Y � Date last revised Unfunded Project Dog Park _ .Date 5/5/2008 05/05/2008 Last printed PR 58 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project 1 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category Project No.- CLP No Group Picnic Areas Fundingsow•ces Parks and Recreation FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 PR -59 Description through FY 2013 Project Location $0 _ -$0 Large group picnic areas would feature benches, a grill, sink and serving table TBD $0 $0 $0 and would seat 60. (Estimated cost of $168,000 for each large picnic area.) Department Lead Project illanager In current FY $0 _ $0 $0 $0 G. Miller TBD work plan $0 $0- $0 $0 (Project Status: - $0 -, $0 I $0 $0 $0 Not in current work plan $0 Total Sources Justification ........... ............. Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan (April 2008), 6 -year FunclrngSourc es, : $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED Capital Improvements Plan. $0 $0 I Unfunded .......... $336,000 TOTAL_ PROJECT COST - Group Picnic Areas Date on inalI SUbntitted Date last revise g Y 5/5/2008 (Design and Construction) Am:$336,000 nfunded Last printed f $336,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 thrr ouugh gh costs FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 .I $0 $0 $0 -- $0 $p Buildings $0 I $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 I $0 $0 $168,000 $168,000 $336,000 ....__... ........... - Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $0 - $0 $0 - $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 - $0 - - $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ............... _... $0 Other Expenses $0 I.'' $0 $0 11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $168,000 $168,000 $336,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Fundingsow•ces FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 $0- $0 _ -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 - _$0 _ $0 $0- $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 - $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 ( $0 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 $0 $0 $0 I $168,000 $168,000 .......... $336,000 Unfunded Project Group Picnic Areas Date on inalI SUbntitted Date last revise g Y 5/5/2008 05/05/2008 Last printed PR ss _ Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project 1 $0 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNante $30,000 I $30,000 (Category Project No ICIP No Skate Features Parks and Recreation PR -60 Description FUNDING SOURCES t Project Location Skate features begin at approximately $15,000 and can run up to $120,000 TBD depending on the size, amount and variety of features such as grind rails, Department Lead Project Manage'- In current FY benches and ramps. FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 G. Miller �TBD work plan $0 $0 (Project Status: $0 $0 J $0 $0 Not in current work plan $0 Justification $0 $0 $0 . Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan (April 2008), 6 -year FuntltngSources. $0 ... Capital Improvements Plan. $0 - $0 Unfunded - $0 $0 $0 $0 -- $0 ._ - $0 "TOTAL PROJECT COST % $0- _$0- $0 l $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $120,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST - $0 $0 ( _ -$0 Estimated $0 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs ti,rough FY 2013 Design /Engineering ! $0 ! $0 f $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 Land Costs $0 - - $0 - - $0 - - -$p $0 $0 - -- $0 - _ Buildings $0 ' $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 05/05/2008 V Friday, dune 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM $0 $30 000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $120,000 ....... Inspections /CM - $0 $0 -� $0 $0 $0 $0 -- $0 Contingencies $0 $0 _I $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 Sales Tax $0 $0......I 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 ( $30,000 $30,000 I $30,000 $30,000 $120,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 J $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ... $0 $0 - $0 $0 _ - $0 $0 $0 $0 -- $0 ._ - $0 - - $0 % $0- _$0- $0 l $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Sources �$0 $0- - $0 $0 ( _ -$0 - $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $120,000 -- Date originally submitted d Unfund Project Skate Features ....... .... _ . .......... ed Last printed PR 60 5/5/2008 05/05/2008 V Friday, dune 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description ProjectName ADA Transition Plan Update 5 -Year Capital Improvement Prograin -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 Description Plan to identify physical changes required to make programs and facilities accessible. Justification Recommended in Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan (April 2008), 6 -year Category (Project No. ICIP No. Capital Improvements Plan. Unfunded t FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 TOTAL PROJECT COST FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 so $0 _ $0 $0 $0 (Design an(] Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $0 $0 _ $0 1 $0 $75,000 $0 $75,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 I $0 $0 $0 Estimated $0 FY 2008 -09 F Y 2009 -10 FY 2010 -I1 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 1" gh costs thro ugh FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 ii $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 — $0 $0 $0 $0 _._. .._. Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 j $0 ! $0 ! $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 ,.. $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $75,000 Total Design/ $0 $0 1 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $75,000 Construction - FUNDING SOURCES t FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 so $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 _. $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 Finding sources through FY 2013 $0 _I $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED ( $0 $O $O $75,000 $0 $O £ $75,000 ADA Transition Plan Update Date originally submitted _Date last revised 1 Unfunded Project 5/5/2008 05/05/2008 PR Last printed 61 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName - _ (Category 1Project N0. ICIP No. Sports Center Renovation Indoor Swimming Facility Parks and Recreation PR -62 Description Project Location FY 2010 -11 Sports Center Renovation including 75' x 30' recreational lap pool with four Sports & Fitness Center (5405 Snyder Lane) through FY 2013 shallow lanes. Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 G. Miller TBD work plan ;! (Project Status: $0 -- Not in current work plan $0 Justification $0 $0 The city's Aquatics Master Plan of 1999 listed this project as a high priority. The FuntltngSout'ces: $0 pool would attract more memberships to the Center and create a better family Unfunded $0 atmosphere to attract and retain members. Year -round swimming is recommended for optimum health, and is particularly feasible for older people, whose numbers are growing rapidly. Also identified in Parks & Recreation ST Facilities Master Plan (April 2008). =and on) Amount unfunded $6,000,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012 -13 project costs ti,roubh FY 2013 Design /Engineering ! $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 ,I $0 $0 _ $0 _ $0 _$0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 I $6,000,000 ............. :. Inspections /CM $0 $o I $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 Contingencies _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _- $0 ___ Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 I $6,000,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding sources $0 FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0_ _ $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 -- $0 I $0 $0 ._. ._... -- - -- -- Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 Date Orl inall Submitted ({ Date last r evised , Sports Center Renovation _& Indoor_ Swimming Facilit _ g y , 1 Unfunded I roject - Last printed PR-62_ _.. 5/5/2008 05/05/2008 �' Friday, June 20, 200812x8:34 PM Description Project $0 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNatne $0 , _ $0 (Category $0 Project No. CIP No Document Management System $0- Technology I TE -06 Description FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Project Location $0 $0 - HR and City Clerk document imaging system $0 $0 City Hall $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 Department Lead Project Manager Li current FY $0 $0 $0 TBD TBD work plan - - $0 $0 (Project Status: - Not in current work plan Justification _ _...... Requested by the Human Resources department in response to HIPPA N unding5out ces: information security requirements Unfunded TOTAL PROJECT COST - (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $165000 $165,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -1 I FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs troug h FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 !t $0 $0 -_ $0 _ $0 - $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -' Ltspections /CM $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 ;! _ $0 -$0 $0 $0 - $0 ......... Sales Tax $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $165,000 1 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000 Total Design/ $0 $165,000 Construction $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $165,000 FUNDING SOURCES $0 _ $0 $0 $0 , _ $0 - $0 I $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0- Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 i $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 , _ $0 - $0 I $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0- Total Sources $$ $0 $0 - -$0 ! $0 $0 $0- $0 ........ -__. GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 $165,000 $0 $0 ( $0 $0 $165,000 ........... Date originally submitted Date last revised Document Management System Unfunded Project Last printed TE os 3/9/2004 05/05/2008 �' Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project 1 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName Funding sources Category 1project No. CIP No. Sidewalk Access Ramps FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 Transportation j TR -19 Description - _ $0 $0 $0 Project Location Install sidewalk access ramps in locations where none are present and to retrofit Citywide existing locations to comply with the Americans with Disabilties Act. , , Department Lead 1 1 oject Manager In current FY $0 $0 $0 TBD TBD work plan;_ $0 $o $o II'roject Status: — $o $o $o Not in current work plan; on hold until funded Justification $0 $0 - - -` $0 Total Sources $0 I . FutttlingSout ces. Sonoma County Grand Jury mandate. $0 $0 $0 $0T $0- Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 I "Redevelopment ...- $400,000 Date originally SU1)Initted Date last revised �.. � Unfunded Project Sidewalk Access Ramps OTAL PROJECT COST , 2/25/2003 05/21/2007 and Construction) Amount unfunded [(Design Last printed TR 19 .... ...._. $400,000 $400,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 it $5,000 i' $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $20,000 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $95,000 $95,000 $95,000 $380,000 $0 $95,000 ;; Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ....... Sales Tax $0 $0 - $0 - -$0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 ) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Totalllesign/ $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 - _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $� - $� _ $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 _ _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o $o $o $o $o $o $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Sources $0 I . $0 $0 $0 $0T $0- $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 I $100,000 $100,000 ...- $400,000 Date originally SU1)Initted Date last revised �.. � Unfunded Project Sidewalk Access Ramps - , 2/25/2003 05/21/2007 Last printed TR 19 .... ...._. Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project 1 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectName (Category IProleet No ICIP No. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Transportation TR -22 Description ....... Project Location Install traffic calming devices at various locations throughout the City. iVarious locations $0 Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $50,000 TBD TBD work plan $50,000 (Project Status: - _- Not in current work plan; on hold until funded Justification $0 This project responds to citizen complaints abuot disruptive problematic, or FunllittgSources: dangerous traffic conditions in neighborhoods Measure M, CDC, Traffic Safety Fund, Redevelopment $0 $4,000 $4,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,000 Sales Tax (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 L $0 L.. $240,000 $200,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST Estimated Other Expenses FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 thro ugh progh costs FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 1 $6,000 1, $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 1 $24,000 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 Buildings $0 I $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $ 005 00 I $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 Sales Tax $0 $0 L $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 11 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 1 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 Construction FUNDING SOURCES FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Redevelopment $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 ................... $o $o $o $o $o 1 $o $o __ $o $o $o I $o $o $0 $200,000 ................... $0 $16,000 _$0 -- __..__...__ $0 $240,000 Funding sources through FY 2013 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $o Total Sources $0 $0 $40,000 $0 1 $0 $0 $40,000 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $20,000 $60,000 I $60,000 $60,000 I $200,000 Date originally submitted Date last reVISCd Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Unfunded Project 2/27/2004 04/21/2008 V; Last printed TR22 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Proect P j 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectNan►e -1 (Category Project No. . ICIP No. .. -- Rohnert Park Expressway Median Modifications Transportation .._.. ....... ............ . ... _ TR -29 Description Project Location $0 Modification of the existing median opening to provide left -turn movement(s) from ,Rohnert Park Expressway $0 I RPX on the Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 TBD TBD work plan $0 a (Project Status: $0 $0 Not in current work plan Sales Tax Justification $0 $0 Intensified development on the south side of Rohnert Park Expressway West at Fun(1►►IgSou► ces $0 the 300 -400 block may warrant modifications to the median to improve turning Unfunded $0 and stacking $0 $0 $0 _ 7'OTAl PROJECT COST $o $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $o $63,600 $63,600 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST $0 Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 project costs through FY 2013 Design /Engineering $0 $0 li $4,800 1 $0 $0 $0 $4,800 Land Costs $0 $0 .( $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 - 1 $48,300 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 I $4,800 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 a $5,700 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,300 $4,800 $5,700 $0 $0 Total Design/ $0 $0 $63,600 $0 $0 $0 $63,600 Construction FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -- -- Jo $o $° $° $o $o - $o $o $o - $o $0 _ $o _ $o $o $0 I $0 $0 $0 ( $0 $0 $0 Total Sources $� $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED $0 $0 $63,600 $0 I $0 $0 $63,600 Date Ol'1 mall SUI)mltted Date last revised Rohnert Park Expressway Median Modifications g Y,,.... � Unfunded Project 2/23/2004 06/15/2005 Last printed TR 29 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Project Description 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program -FY 08 -09 to FY 12 -13 ProjectN ►me 1 [Category Project No. ICIP No. __._..._ Hwy 101 Wilfred Ave Golf Course Drive Interchange Transportation $0 TR -33 -- -- - -- - Description — _ ......... ... Project Location . -.. Upgrade existing interchange Hwy 101, Wilfred Ave, Golf Course Drive $0 Buildings Department Lead Project Manager In current FY $0 j Caltrans P. Barnes (liaison) work elan $0 IP►•oject Status: $0 $0 Design $0 Justification ..... Inspections /CM The Public Facilities Finance Plan schedules this for construction in order to Fuudu►g5our(es: -_ maintain service levels. STIP Improvement District Funding, Measure M Contingencies $0 TOTALPROJECTCOST _ ;1 $4,000,000 $0 $0 (Design and Construction) Amount unfunded $0 $0 I $32 000,000 $32,000,000 DESIGN /CONSTRUCTION COST ......... $0 Estimated FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 I I I : FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 Pro6 ct costs th rou gh FY 2013 Design/Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Buildings $0 $0 $0 j $0 ) $0 $0 Improvements $0 $0 28,000 000 $0 $0 $0 Inspections /CM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingencies $0 $0 ;1 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 Sales Tax $0 $0 1 $0 $0 ......... $0 $0 $0 - _ $0 $0 - -._.. _._.. -.. $28,000,000 $0 ........ _.___ $4,000,000 — - $0..._... Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - - Total Design/ $0 $0 ,32,000,000 $0 ( $0 j Construction $0 $32,000,000 FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources FY 2008 -09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2010 -11 FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 through FY 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 J $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -- _ $0_ __- _ $0 .- $0 $0 - $0 _. _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 j $0 $0 $0 I $p - - $0 . $0 $0 - $0 $0 ( $0 $0 . Total Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 j -_ $0 $0 GAP FUNDING NEEDED I $0 $0 $32,000,000 $0 I $0 $0 $32,000,000 Date originally submitted Date last revised Unfunded Project Hwy 101 Wilfred Ave -Golf Course Orive Interchange 3/25/2004 05/14/2007 Last printed TR 33 Friday, June 20, 2008 12:18:34 PM Item No.: `) File No.:PL2008- 020CIP PC RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE DRAFT FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FY 2008 -2013 IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ROHNERT PARK GENERAL PLAN 2000 WHEREAS, on July 25, 2001 the City Council approved Resolution No. 2000 -152 adopting a comprehensive update of the City's General Plan. WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65401 requires the Planning Commission to review and report to the City Council as to the conformity of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to the City's adopted General Plan. WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PL2008- 020CIP, review of the draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Budget FY 2008 -2013 for conformity with the General Plan, was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, on June 12, 2008 the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Application No. PL2008- 020CIP, the draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Budget Fiscal Years 2008 -2013, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the project; and, WHEREAS, at the June 12, 2008 Planning Commission meeting, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all the facts relating to Planning Application No. PL2008- 020CIP, the draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Budget Fiscal Years 2008 -2013. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval to the City Council of Planning Application No. PL2008- 020CIP, the draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Budget Fiscal Years 2008 -2013, makes the following finding, to wit: Based its own discussion and analysis, and its review of the staff analysis, the Planning Commission finds that the City's draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Budget FY 2008- 2013 is in confornity with, and supports the goals and policy direction established in the Rohnert Park General Plan 2000. Planning Commission Staff Report June 12, 2008 Page 7 of 8 Item No.: � File No.:PL2008- 020C1P Section 3. Environmental Clearance. This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to the California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15306 (Class 6 - Information Collection). NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby report to the City Council that the draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Budget Fiscal Years 2008 -2013, Planning Application No. PL2008- 020CIP, is in substantial conformity with the Rohnert Park General Plan 2000. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 12th day of .Tune 2008, by the City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission by the following vote: !s Amy Ahanotu, Chairperson; Rohnert Park Planning Commission Attest:.,..;; ,(d! 'Susan Azevedo, l;2ecording Secretary AYES: 1 NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ADAMS AHANOTU >/ ARMSTRONG `1 CA.LLINAN KILAT Planning Commission Staff Report June 12, 2008 Page 8 of 8 Griffin, Terri Page 1 of 1 �T EN No. to Distr. @ Mtg. Ot cc: From: Tacata, Eydie F� iie: Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 9:08 AM Foie' To: Griffin, Terri; Barnes, Patrick Subject: CIP errata for distribution tonight at Council mtg Importance: High Attachments: 4907_001. pdf Terri and Pat: For Council distribution tonight, attached are two sheets to replace two pages in error in the CIP: (1) The first page on the "project summary" sheet (showing expenses through 07 -08 for City Hall) (2) Unfunded CIP Proj. #OF -30, Public Works Corporation Yard Asphalt Repair (showing no funding sources) Thanks Eydie From: bldc @rpcity.org [mailto:bldc @rpcity.org] Sent: Tue 6/24/2008 9:05 AM To: Tacata, Eydie Subject: Attached Image 6/24/2008 O �o 't o t C) co C) 0> to of C14 LO ir cl tl� co -! r- 0 in v .9 60 C3 C .......... 92 C) 0 0 O m m ca 05 4,9 o �N cn m m 41 a -1 co ml O tf) LO CL C3 C .......... 92 m m ca 05 �N cn m m 41 a C3 LL a! 2 41 E2 CL CL 0 ML w 1 0 all w E E 0 E E ol Of U>j -6 CL .19 .0 ¢ M Fos CL 0 co co p co 0 D- Z5 W E r E pp 0 D'. (S L Q d 10 C? O tz N M M C? O CL C3 C 92 05 �N O CL 92 O _ ..... _._...._..._..------__-. ..............__.._.Li g _ _ Project Description s -Year Capital ITnprovement Program 44.08 -09 . I . . I I to FY 12 -1.3 OR% [rrojectName �� . _ I Category . Project No. CIP No. Public Works Corporation Yard Asphalt Repair ;Other FaciEities ;OF -30 - -.,- — .-_ _. __ ... -._ _. .- . Description . . . . .. . Project Location..._ .. .. _._._........_.- ...._ -....- - ... . -.... - _ ..... ._.._..._ ...._..-_......_.....__ -- - ____-.._. - - - - -- — ;Regular repair and replacement of corporation yard, parking lot and driveway , ;Corporation Yard (600 Enterprise Drive) . e. ar men . ea ro�ec anager _ .. 'M. Bracewell zTBD F`Y fvork la i _ _ -------- ------- _. _. _.......... I . Piroject Status:. :.: .......... . ., ..... ...... _..- _.._...... _ .... ........................I...... _...._.......__.......__. ...._....._..._.._....- .._..... ._........ , ;Unfu ; .. . , . , .. .. ..... .. Jtistiiicatitin:: .... _.... _ _ .. - ....... .. ....:. ......_.._ _ _ —nde ... . -- - - .. - - . — ___,_ -_. _ .... . . F .. . undzngSources;.:: :.: - ; : ;. .. . . : ICorporation yard asphalt is in desperate need of attention, repairs must be made ..: , ito prevent further damage to base rock and to provide a safe working � Water operations, sewer operations, General Fund environment for employees L. L: ..: :; i .... - 11. -. -.. ., _ ._.__......... ...... :: TOTAL: :1'ROJEC ...::............:.... .. ...........:.:. :.::.::.:_...._...I..........._ _:.... ...: . . G; .....( Design "an_d Conti.. ruction):;:::::;:. Am6u> t unfundeii :..... ' F. ^.._ ....... i $261,500 $261,500 I. m .. _ DESIGNICONSTRUCTION :COST .. :. - :Estimated - .. .. ...... ' -EY 2008 -09 It FY 2009 10 FY 2010 11 FY2011 12 FY 2012 13 I. . project costs . through FY 2013 ......... . ....................... . Deslg►tlEngneeria.:: -:. $0:'': g: :!::.:.:: 11 _ 0 $o i �� $0 $a I1 $a ' I: ........ ... .... ... .....: 1— ::.: ::.::....:......__..- ______:.:I 3 _..._._..— - - -- is .—.J . .. — Land Costs I $0 �I� ;.I $O...II':.,. $0 �` $o ii . _. _ "$0 .. $0 . :...: - I ... .... .. .:........:.:.:..::. ...... ....... .. .....:................. .: Build>!n s...::::;- ::::.:::_:: t: $.0: =::: ...... ...g ...... . ............................... . ...... .. .. .... ... $0 `I $0 $0 $a $ T i. — $0 ... ........_77_ . ....... ..... Irreprovemerits $0 . ....: _ . , ..., ... . $0 -. . ;.. -- $261,500 'j $fl $a $0... ., r..., s 261,500 __ .............:............. ........- .......:...._._..::.:. ,_..::._.:......... Inspecttoris /CM: $a t . ..... .. .... :._�_ $0 $0 $0 $a j $0' - .. $0 1 .- i _: , i _ - ...... 7_.__7,_:,::7 . ........ . .. ._ . Contingencies::- :.:::::.: :::: *: $0; ::;,I .....:,. .... . , . ............:..:.:. :.::.:::..::.......:....:...... :::.I� $0 _ __..._: . _ , �_ - 17 $0 $0 $a $a i ._ —_� . ......_-- .__.._. $0 i .... .. .. .. Sales Taz 0� 11 u 0 0 $ 4 $0 .. $a $0 .... .._.. _. _... ..... . - ether Expenses $o ]], i $o i It I:- $0 1; $0 $0 $b }. 1. :_ $0 _ .� . Total DesigW _ $p ,; L _.::_ $0 .....: _ $261500 ?� $0 I $0 $o i $z615aa G Constrtrctaon �— „n ... .::. ........ - — - .._ FUNDING SOURCES . _ : _ FY 200$,-09 . . . 4. . Fuhd�ng sources through FY,;20T3.. .. FY 2Q09 ;10 -:7;:-: FY 2010 11 FY'2011 12 F'Y .2012 -13 .. .. F. I;z 's — i $a . t' I _ , .._..... __ �... $a ; $a �1 $0 $a $a $0 l.. .... .: ... ­—.1—'.... '' ' .. ..:: 11 $o ; $0 „ $0 $o $a ._. $o $0 I! .... .. _.._ .. ...--.---j - —_ _ , $o ' -: _._._._.-- .._... -I . .. $0 Imo- a $o $o $a : $ i _ ; ........ ... .... ._. . 1. : I 0 i_.._..._-- -- - - - -. � E2 _-_ $0 i( .... _ _ .. � I $0 $0 $a _. _ ..� - - $0 ::.. .,:. Total S0- arces $0 ' i $ I $0 $0 $0 $0 ! ; $0 -. E _ - .. GAPFUNMNONEEDEQ ( $Q. . $0 i - $261500 11 $a s $a I $0 — _ — ; . $261,500 ,: 1- _ , ,.. _..._. -._. I. 3 _.. .:... ..,.,._... ....:-- - .:..::..:.::.:::::: -::, ::.:..::.:.::..._ —............. :::: ::.:.:::..::.:::::::.:...., -:::,. .- ..._:.- _,.,...,:--- l- _:_._- -- - - °:-= ::= :;- :r:-- := :-:= :-::: - = -. - -:- ::-.._ - -:.. Public Works'Corporaflon Yard Asphalt Repair Unfunded Project - - ,. Last printed QF 30 Date originally submitted - Date last revised - 06/24/2008 3/3/2006 F .. ... ; R Tuesday, June 24, 200 .9 0013 AM Cloverdale Cotati Healdsburg Petaluma Rohnert Park Santa Rosa Sebastopol Sonoma Windsor MAYORS' & COUNCILMEMBERS' ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY Council: X Santa Rosa Miscellaneous Cotati Communications. Healdsburg Agenda: 6/24/08 X 6/18/08 -TG Copy to: Windsor. City of Rohnert Park, Chair City for 2008 Mayor Jake Mackenzie 6750 Commerce Boulevard Rohnert Park, .CA 94928 707 588 -2226 AGENDA 6:0 PM -- BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Date: Thursday, June 12, 2008 Time: 6:00 PM — City Selection Committee Meeting 6:30 PM - Board of Directors Meeting .7:00 PM — Dinner /General Membership Meeting Location:. Sonoma Mountain Village; 1100 Valley House Drive 1. CALL TO ORDER: Association Chairperson Jake Mackenzie, City of Rohnert Park 2. ROLL CALL Cloverdale Santa Rosa Cotati Sebastopol Healdsburg Sonoma Petaluma Windsor. Rohnert Park 3. APPROVAL of MINUTES A.. Board of Directors, April 10, 2008, in Petaluma Motion/ second 4. BUSINESS ACTION ITEMS A. Amending Association By -Laws to include Teleconferencing. B. Formation of a Sonoma County Climate Action Policy Working Group as part of the Sonoma County Climate,Action Congress. 5 NEW BUSINESS ACTION ITEM A. Request to Amend Mayors and. Councilmembers meeting schedule and reschedule October 9h meeting to October 2nd or October 13`h due to Yom Kippur Religious Day Observance. 6. NEXT GENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING .Host City: Santa Rosa Date: August 14, 2008 Place: TBD Program: TBD 7. ADJOURNMENT: Adjourn to Thursday, August 14, 2008, at 6:00 PM in Santa Rosa Cloverdale Cotati HeaIdsburg Petaluma Rohnert Park Santa Rosa Sebastopol Sonoma Windsor MAYORS' & COUNCILMEMBERS' ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY City of Rohnert Park, Chair City for 2008 Mayor Jake Mackenzie 6750 Commerce Boulevard Rohnert Park, CA 94928 707 588 -2226 AGENDA GENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING Date: Thursday, June 12, 2008 Time: 6:00 PM — Social Hour begins 6:30 PM — Board Meeting 7:00 PM — Dinner /General Membership Meeting Location: Sonoma Mountain Village, 1100 Valley House Drive, Rohnert Park- 1. . CALL TO ORDER:. Association Chairperson Jake Mackenzie, City of Rohnert Park 2. ROLL CALL 3 Cloverdale Petaluma Rohnert Park Santa Rosa Windsor I ACTION: Celebration of Mayor Bob Blanchard's Public Service 4. APPROVAL of MINUTES A. General Membership Meeting, April 10, 2008 in Petaluma Motion / second 5. TREASURER'S REPORT: Balance $564.50 6. CORRESPONDENCE 7. REPORTS A. Mayors B. City Manager's Committee: Steve Donley, Chairperson, City of Rohnert Park C..Legi.slative Committee: Spokesperson D. Committee Chairs: Other Reports E. Report from Association Chairperson on.Board of Directors /City Selection Committee Actions P. League of California Cities Policy Committees Meeting Reports G. Sonoma County Waste Management Agency Chair Tim Smith: Update on Plastics H. Announcements I. Legislative Update: League of California Cities — Amy O'Gorman 8. DISCUSSION ! ACTION ITEMS B. Amending Association By -Laws to include Teleconferencing C. Formation of a Sonoma County Climate Action Policy Working Group as part of the Sonoma County Climate Action Congress. 9. PROGRAM Sonoma County Transportation Plan — Suzanne Wilford Smith 10. NEXT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Host City: Santa Rosa Date: Thursday, August 14, 2008 Place: TBD Program: TBD 11. ADJOURNMENT: Adjourn to Thursday, August 14, 2008 at 6:00 PM in Santa Rosa Council: X _ Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6/18/08 -TG Copy to: ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL WASTE & RECYCLING SUB - COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Friday, June 13, 2008 11:00 A.M. Rohnert Park Administrative Offices 6750 Commerce Boulevard Committee Members: Arnie Breeze, Council Member Tim Smith, Council Member City Staff: Steve Donley, City Manager Dan Schwarz, Assistant City Manager Sandy Lipitz, Director of Administrative Services Linda Babonis, Management Analyst Cathy Orme, Accounting Manager Kristina Owens, Utility Billing Supervisor 11:00 a.m. REGULAR SESSION — Open to Public 1. Call to Order 2. Introductions -Staff 3. Public Comments, if any 4. Refuse Rate Model ■ Demonstration and Discussion - R3 Consulting 5. Next Steps - Direction from Committee 6. Adjournment Posted in accordance with state law. Disabled Accommodation: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting; please contact the City Offices at (707) 588.2226 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure City accommodations. Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6/24108 X 6/18/08 -TG Copy to: SONOMA COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT AGENCY June 18, 2008 *Please note time change* City of Santa Rosa Utilities Department Subregional Water Reclamation System Laguna Plant 4300 Llano Road, Santa Rosa, CA 95407 Estuary Meeting Room Estimated Ending Time 11:30 a.m. AGENDA ITEM Call to Order /Introductions ACTION )NA COUNTY Waste Management Agency 2. Attachments /Correspondence: Director's Agenda Notes Cold Creek Compost, Inc. Operational Documents (to be distributed at meeting) 3. On file w /Clerk: for copy call 565 -3579 Resolutions approved in May 2008 2008 -018 Resolution of the SCWMA Authorizing the Purchase of Recycling Containers from Creative Pipe, Inc. for use in the Town of Windsor 2008 -019 Resolution of the SCWMA Approving the Purchase Order with Norseman Plastics for the Purchase of Kitchen Veggie Scrap Collection Pails 2008 -020 Resolution of the SCWMA Approving the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement for AB 939 and HHW Facility Services, by and between the Agency and the City of Petaluma 2008 -021 Resolution of the SCWMA Authorizing an Agreement with ASL for Electronic Waste (e- waste) Collection Event Services 4. Public Comments (items not on the agenda) CONSENT (w /attachments) Discussion /Action 5.1 Minutes of May 21, 2008 5.2 Beverage Container Purchase REGULAR CALENDAR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE 6.1 EPR Presentation by Bill Worrell, Discussion /Action Zero Waste Presentation AB 939 Local Discussion /Action San Luis Obispo Task Force [Steinman] EDUCATION 6.2 EPR Implementation Plan (Ordinance) Discussion /Action [Stein man] (Attachment) 10.2 6.3 Third Amendment to Agreement with C2 UNANIMOUS VOTE Alternative Services to Audit Oil Recycling Centers and Coordinate Oil Recycling Publicity and Programs [Steinman] (Attachment) COMPOSTING/WOOD WASTE 7.1 Compost Program Update Discussion /Action [Klassen] 7.2 Compost Relocation Update Discussion /Action [Carter] (Attachment) ADMINISTRATION 8.1 Future Funding Discussion Discussion /Action [Fisher] 8.2 Divestiture Agreements Discussion /Action [Klassen] (Attachment) 8.3 Update on Executive Director Position Discussion /Action [Klassen] (Attachment) DIVERSION 9.1 Zero Waste Presentation AB 939 Local Discussion /Action Task Force [Klassen] (Attachment) EDUCATION 10.1 Back -to- School Grant Program Discussion /Action [C hilcott] (Attachment) 10.2 Spanish Language Outreach Agreement Discussion /Action [Chilcott](Attachment) 11. Boardmember Comments 12. Staff Comments 13. Adjourn CONSENT CALENDAR: These matters include routine financial and administrative actions and are usually approved by a single majority vote. Any Boardmember may remove an item from the consent calendar. REGULAR CALENDAR: These items include significant and administrative actions of special interest and are classified by program area. The regular calendar also includes "Set Matters," which are noticed hearings, work sessions and public hearings. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Pursuant to Rule 6, Rules of Governance of the Sonoma County Waste Management Agency, members of the public desiring to speak on items that are within the jurisdiction of the Agency shall have an opportunity at the beginning and during each regular meeting of the Agency. When recognized by the Chair, each person should give his /her name and address and limit comments to 3 minutes. Public comments will follow the staff report and subsequent Boardmember questions on that Agenda item, and before Boardmembers propose a motion to vote on any item. DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability that requires the agenda materials to be in an alternative format or requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact the Sonoma County Waste Management Agency Office at 2300 County Center Drive, Suite 8100, Santa Rosa, (707) 565- 3579, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting, to ensure arrangements for accommodation by the Agency. Council: X _ Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6 /18 /08 -TG Copy to: o cs — m d O U +•C+ E d O N cfl6 C G 7 O E w N fn C) m >, V W N d >+ LL- CM ca d ¢ c t U 3 3 cc N O N d d� f0 Fyi +� V y C N 1 O L7 C • V V V Q ge. ti a� .r .� .�co. P ai O d N . •y f0 '�` w Q N ca va P � w 3 0 ►+ b as '� a3i y w tP0 w ca t0 W o � V o w G l N V W toy, Distr. @ Mtg. Of:_o- U cc� CC' County of Sonoma File: of the Board Use Only ng Date File: Agenda Item Summary Report ;1,4 () gend Item No: s7- . Department: ❑ 4/5 Vote Required Permit and Resource Management Department Contact: Phone: Board Date: Deadline for Board Action: Pete Parkinson 565 -1925 6/24/08 AGENDA SHORT TITLE: Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy Implementation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Staff recommends that the Board decline to participate financially in the Implementation Plan process and that the process be put on indefinite hold. CURRENT FISCAL YEAR FINANCIAL IMPACT EXPENDITURES AWL FUNDS REQUIRING BOARD APPROVAL Estimated Cost $ NA Contingencies $ (Fund Name: ) Amount Budgeted $ Unanticipated Revenue $ (Source: ) Other Available Approp. $ Other Transfer(s) (Explain Below) (Source: ) $ Additional Requested: $ Total Source of Funds: $ Explanation (if required): Prior Board Action(s): November 2005 — Endorsed Conservation Strategy and adopted Planning Agreement. January 2006 — Approved structure of Implementation Committee January 2007 — Provided direction on method of take authorization. Alternatives — Results of Non- Approval: (1) Board could decide to fund all or portion of Implementation Plan process if funding source is identified; (2) Board could direct that process could be retooled as a Habitat Conservation Plan Cana,.r c...,.. n..,, ,A_ nn o%nc nn no c•n ni..:., r��..,- c..... I_- I_, _..._.__ — Background: Introduction The purpose of this agenda item is to update the Board on the efforts of the Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy Implementation Committee and to seek Board direction on how this process should move forward, if at all. This report will provide a brief background and history, discuss several key issues, outline alternatives and conclude with a staff recommendation. Background and History The Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy process began in 2004, primarily as an effort between the Santa Rosa development community (with support from the City of Santa Rosa), the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) to address both development and conservation issues associated with the listing of the Sonoma County distinct population segment of the California tiger salamander (CTS) as an endangered species. The effort was intended to be a streamlined alternative to the often drawn -out Habitat Conservation Plan process that is set forth in the federal Endangered Species Act. Several local governments were represented on the Strategy Team by a single staff person from the City of Santa Rosa. County staff participated in an advisory capacity. Near the end of 2005, the Strategy Team completed the Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy (Strategy), which described the biology of the CTS, identified "Conservation Areas" where contiguous CTS preserves could be established, and described the mitigation requirements for development within CTS habitat areas. The Strategy also addressed the conservation and mitigation needs of four endangered plant species found in wetland areas on the Plain. The Strategy did not contain many implementation details and some issues, like agricultural land uses, were addressed only preliminarily. Nonetheless, in November 2005 the County, the cities of Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park and Cotati and the Town of Windsor all entered into a Planning Agreement that expressed support for the conservation and mitigation principles set forth in the Strategy and committed to forming an Implementation Committee (Committee) comprised of the local jurisdictions and various stakeholder groups including agriculture, environmental groups and development/private landowner interests for the purpose of Page I of 5 Attachments: Attachment A. City of Santa Rosa City Council Report, May 13, 2008 On File With Clerk: CLERK OF THE BOARD USE ONLY Board Action (If other than "Requested ") Vote: FA13d of Sups Agenda I1ems\2008 \06 -24 -08 SR Plain Consery Strat I nplem__sunnn.doc Background (Continued) developing an implementation plan within two years. The late -2005 timing of the Planning Agreement was the direct result of pressure related to a court order requiring the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to decide whether to designate Critical Habitat for the CTS in Sonoma County. Ultimately, and at least partly as a result of the Planning Agreement, the FWS decided to exclude any Critical Habitat designation. The Implementation Committee was formed in early 2006 and has met monthly since that time. Steve Shupe from the County Counsel's office and Pete Parkinson from PRMD have provided staff support for the Committee since its inception. The Committee adopted a work plan early on, but several key issues have proven difficult to resolve. In the summer of 2007, County staff prepared a Draft Implementation Plan to stimulate Committee discussion of-remaining issues. Progress has remained very slow, however, as several key issues have occupied the Committee's attention. These issues — which include funding, staffing, agricultural issues and uncertainty about the method of obtaining "take" authorization— remain unresolved, and the Committee's work has stalled as a result. Each issue is discussed in more detail below. Funding The Committee has long recognized that, in addition to services provided by County staff and technical advisors, funding would be needed to complete the Implementation Plan process. In particular, local funding to complete an environmental document meeting the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA is necessary. In early 2007, the County used its contract grantwriter to develop a grant proposal under Section 6 of the federal Endangered Species Act, which provides funding for preparing Habitat Conservation Plans and other conservation activities. Despite assurances from the then - Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Julie McDonald, that Sonoma County's application would be given full consideration even though our process did not include a HCP, the application was ultimately not funded for that reason. Staff believes that the consultant cost to complete the Implementation Plan process will be at least $500,000, in addition to in -kind services provided by staff. This includes the cost of the environmental document, development of an adaptive management plan that is needed to ensure long -term conservation benefits and project management to complete the Implementation Plan process. The Committee's expectation has been that the City of Santa Rosa would underwrite most of this cost because most of the development- related benefits of the Strategy will occur in the City. Since late 2007, City officials have expressed increasing concern about both the Implementation Plan process and the state of the City's budget. At the May 21 Committee meeting, Vice -Mayor John Sawyer distributed the attached City Council memorandum and indicated that the Council had decided not to fund the process at this time due to the City's budgetary constraints and increasing uncertainty about whether the process would ultimately be successful without doing an HCP (see further discussion of this issue below). The City recommended that the Implementation Plan process be put on hold. Page 2 of 5 FABd of Sups Agenda Items\2008 \06 -24 -08 SR Plain Consery Strat lmplem_su mn.doc Background (Continued) Staffing Issues County staff has told the Implementation Committee that the current level of support from the County Counsel's office and PRMD is not sustainable without a funding source. Further, even if funding for project management is obtained, moving this effort forward will still require a significant staffing commitment for contract management, document review, etc., and this commitment will be difficult given other workload demands in the County Counsel's office and staff reductions at PRMD. Agricultural Issues The issue of whether agricultural activities can be covered under the Implementation Plan appears to be at Loggerheads. From the FWS perspective, providing "take" coverage for ongoing agricultural activities would require implementation of certain best management practices, and agricultural conversions (e.g. converting pasture. to vineyard) would require the acquisition of other property for mitigation. These requirements are not acceptable to the agricultural community. The mitigation requirements for conversions are seen as economically infeasible. More recently, agricultural stakeholders have attempted to work on a "Safe Harbor Agreement" with FWS in an effort to provide coverage for agricultural operations with or without an Implementation Plan. To date this effort has not been successful. The uncertainty about coverage for agricultural operations is also an issue for the City of Santa Rosa, which relies heavily on agricultural irrigation in the Santa Rosa Plain to operate its subregional wastewater system. Take Authorization The issue of how take authorization would be granted under the federal Endangered Species Act has occupied the Committee's attention almost since the beginning and remains an issue today. Briefly, despite reservations expressed by staff and the agency technical advisors, the Committee has thus far pursued an alternative to the conventional (and statutorily authorized) HCP process, opting instead for an untested application of the Section 7 consultation process (known in shorthand as the "Section 7 /MOU" approach). The Section 7 /MOU approach has been promoted as an equally effective alternative to an HCP and was heavily supported by Deputy Assistant Secretary McDonald, and, originally, by agricultural and development interests and the City of Santa Rosa. Among the risks presented by the Section 7 /MOU approach is a lack of certainty relative to the HCP process. Since it is apparent that an Implementation Plan will not be in place prior to the advent of a new federal administration, this uncertainly is even greater, and played a role in the Santa Rosa City Council's decision to recommend placing the process on hold. On January 23, 2007, your Board considered the take authorization issue, including the potential problems with the Section 7 /MOU approach. Because the Section 7 /MOU approach had already been endorsed by the other local jurisdictions, the Board gave conditional approval to moving forward in that direction. These conditions included: (i) "automatic" take coverage for ministerial projects and agricultural activities without the need for a separate approval from FWS or CDFG; (ii) that the ability Page 3 of 5 FABd of Sups Agenda Items\2008 \06 -24 -08 SR Plain Consery Strat Implem_summ.doc Baekfround (Continued) of FWS and /or CDFG to change mitigation requirements in the future is minimized; and (iii) that a successful legal challenge to the Section 7 /MOU would affect all projects, not just those that did not otherwise have a federal nexus. At this time it appears unlikely that these conditions will be met. After hearing the City's presentation about funding the Implementation Plan process on May 21, the Committee briefly discussed the possibility of doing an HCP to make the effort eligible for federal funding. There was no decision on this question, but staff pointed out that, based on our experience with the grant application last year, we would still be looking at a significant local match (i.e., 50 percent) in order to be competitive with other proposals that cover a wider range of endangered species and a larger geographic area. Staff also noted that the consultant contacted about project cost indicated that retooling for an HCP would likely cost an additional $200,000 to $250,000. Critical Habitat Without funding and with the growing uncertainty about the Section 7 /MOU approach, the Committee's efforts cannot move forward. Some concern has been expressed that abandoning this effort could lead to designation of "Critical Habitat" under the Act, either by FWS initiative or court order. The Center for Biological Diversity has already provided FWS with an "intent to sue" on this issue, regardless of whether the Strategy and Implementation Plan move forward. FWS staff has confirmed that adoption of an Implementation Plan would not necessarily forestall a Critical Habitat designation in the future, and that the only way to accomplish that is with a Habitat Conservation Plan. Although much has been made about the effect of a critical habitat designation, FWS staff indicated that it would not likely affect the outcome of many development projects. It does make the process somewhat more cumbersome, however. Interim Mitigation Guidelines Even if the Conservation Strategy Implementation Plan process is terminated or suspended, the process has been beneficial in a number of ways. Most significantly, as a result of the Conservation Strategy process, FWS has adopted "Interim" mitigation guidelines for CTS, which have been incorporated into a Programmatic Biological Opinion and are thus applicable to any project with a federal "nexus." Since most larger projects in the Santa Rosa Plain have such a federal nexus because they result in the fill of wetlands (thus requiring a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), most larger projects will know what mitigation requirements apply. The absence of guidance from FWS on mitigation requirements was a driving force behind development of the Strategy, but the "interim" guidelines now provide such guidance. In addition, the work done to identify the best areas for targeting the acquisition of mitigation land for CTS will help make any land set aside for CTS more effective from a conservation perspective. Thus several of the most important goals of the Conservation Strategy have already been attained. Page 4 of 5 P: \Bd of Sups Agenda ltems\2008 \06 -24 -08 SR Plain Consery Strat lmplem_ sum in.doc Background (Continued) Alternatives Given the above, the following alternatives available: The County could underwrite the cost of completing the Implementation Plan, estimated to be at least $500,000. Staff does not recommend this option because the County is experiencing its own budget difficulties and there is no source of funding available, and because we do not believe that the Implementation Plan provides sufficient benefits to the County to justify this investment. Finally, we concur with the City of Santa Rosa that the Section 7 /MOU process is too uncertain to make this investment. 2. The process can be retooled as an HCP. This would address the uncertainty inherent in the Section 7 /MOU process and could open up federal funding opportunities. The cost would be somewhat greater, but FWS staff has indicated that much of the biological work needed for an HCP has already been done. It should be noted, however, that some stakeholder groups, notably agriculture and the development community, are not likely to support going with an HCP. Staffing and the local share of funding for this effort would also need to be addressed. The Implementation Plan process can be terminated or placed on indefinite hold. As noted above, FWS has developed a new Programmatic Biological Opinion with the Corps that helps streamline the process for projects that have a federal nexus via wetlands. FWS staff have also indicated they would develop a template for a "low effect" HCP that could be used by project proponents that do not have a federal nexus. The Strategy itself continues to provide important biological information about CTS and helps direct development of conservation banks to the most appropriate areas. The interim CTS mitigation guidelines would also remain in place, which provides developers with certainty as to mitigation requirements and process. However, the guidelines do require a graduated mitigation ratio (3:1 to 1:1, depending on proximity to CTS breeding site) whereas the Strategy calls for a uniform 2:1 ratio in most areas. Mitigation at the highest ratio may be prohibitively expensive for some projects. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board decline to participate financially in this effort at this time and that the Implementation Plan process be placed on indefinite hold. Page 5 of 5 FA13d of Sups Agenda 1tems\2008 \06 -24 -08 SR Plain Consery Strat lmplem_summ.doc �Ory AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL RERORT.AND SUMMARY 1. AGENDA TITLE: CALIFORNIA TIGER SALAMANDER - FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES REQUESTED AGENDA DATE: MAY 13, 20'08 2. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: AYAH ALMAHDI; SR. ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT AUTHOR: CHUCK REGALIA, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 3. PRESENTER: CHUCK -REGALIA 4. ❑ Study Session ❑ Consent Item ® Report Item ❑ Public Hearing ❑ Presentation /proclamation 5. Public Appearance Anticipated? ❑ Yes ❑ No 6. AGENDA SUMMARY: Costs to conduct the CEQA/NEPA review of the Memorandum of Agreement are now estimated to be at least $500,000. Current potential revenues include a $100,000 contribution from the Sub- regional system and $10,000 each from the cities'of Cotati and Rohnert Park. No funding has been budgeted by the City of Santa Rosa, RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended by the Department of Community Development and the City Managers Office that the Council, by motion, place funding of the MOA environmental process on hold until certainty is established at the federal level and until funding is available. 7. VOTE: 5/7 VOTE REQUIRED? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. ORDINANCE SUMMARY —Attach 9. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS: ® NOT A PROJECT ❑ EXEMPT PROJECT ❑ NOT A PROJECT AT THIS TIME ❑ NEGATIVE 'DECLARATION ❑ EIR CERTIFIED BY ❑ P.C. OR ❑ C.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE: 1 -- r)� 1� (Environme { I or) ate) F: \Bd of Sups Agenda Items\2008 \06 -24 -08 SR Plain Consery Strat Implem_att.pdf q 0 3 10. RESO LUTION (S)- AN-D-ORD.l NANG E(S)': Recommended Action (indicate number of each): ORDINANCE —RESOLUTION OTHER: Describe NUHNU 11 Nb UilYLL-,LKK--KLUUL6,-I-L-U-.4'-Att-a'ch�labi5ls:crr-,pre- addressed envelopes. Agendas will be mailed the Friday prior to the meeting date. ,12. CERTIFICATION OF ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT HEAD: -(bate') 13. EMERGENCY SCHEDULING CLEARANCE:' (City Manager) (Date) Version-05.Q.708-,.--.,-:,., F:\Bd of Sups Agenda ltems\2008\06-24-08 SR Plain Consery Strat Implem_att.pdf TO: SUBJECT: STAFF PRESENTER AGENDA ACTION ISSUE (S) Agenda Item #[To be inserted by City Clerk's Office staff] For Council Meeting of: May 13, 2008 CITY OF SANTA ROSA CITY COUNCIL MAYOR AND CITY CO.U.NCIL CALIFORNIA TIGER 'SALANIANDER — FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL.ST.U.DIES CHUCK REGALIA, :D1RECTOR COMMUNITY 'DEVELOPMENT MOTION(S) Should the City Council authorize funding for preparation of the CEQA /NEPA documents supporting the adoption of the Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy Implementation Plan Memorandum of Agreement? BACKGROUND 1. The City of Santa Rosa has a long history of involvement in and commitment to the resolution of issues related to the California Tiger Salamander. Substantial staff resources. and financial support has been provided, including: • Staffing the Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy; • Providing legal support to public and private efforts; • Staffing initial implement committee efforts; and • Participating in the Implementation Committee in review of the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). As recently as March 18, 2008, the City Council indicated that the City does not object to serving as the fiscal agent for the CEQA/NEPA document .preparation if the Memorandum of Agreement meets our objectives and if a cost sharing agreement is developed with the participating agencies, land owners and applicants. City staff and consultants have continued to work with the Agricultural Sub - Committee and the Fish & Wildlife Service to determine if a "Safe Harbor" agreement will be a better mechanism to meet the City's objectives that the Memorandum of Agreement. 2. In the intervening months, the City's economic outlook has continued to weaken; all major City revenue sources have either declined or projected growth has F: \Bd of Sups Agenda Items\2008\06 -24 -08 SR Plain Consery Strat Implem_att.pdf California Tiger Salamander- Funding for Environmental Studies May 13, 2008 City Council Meeting Page;2 of -4' ,. declined. We are experiencing an economic slowdown which has restricted our ability to fund this project. ANALYSIS 1. Costs:to.,co e .nduct the CEQA/NEPA review of the MOA are now estimated. to be least $500,000. Current potential - revenues :include.a ;$1.00,000 contribution from the Sub - regional system and :$T00:00 •each from the cities of.Cotati and.Rohnert, Park. No funding has bee rib iJq `0 ed;by:the City of;Sanfa Rosa: ` The City's funding concept has been to provide, initially financing.-;tp conduct. the CEQA/NEPA review and then be repaid via a yet -to -be adopted fee on new development applications submitted in the area covered by the MOA. Due to the housing downturn, the feasibility of this approach and eventual repayment--is questioned. 2. Concern continues with regard to the feasibility o.f the MOA approach verses adoption of a Habitat Conservation-,! ✓ .. ?lan, particularly with -the pending change in the national administration and ongoing Iegai challenges. This concern focuses on the likelihood of the effort being lost if the direction is changed.,-;,., In, addition, since the w.ork,to, achieve_ the :- Safe..Harbo.r..agreement_with the, Fish & . Wildlife Service appearstprom�smg and: may substitute,for th.e .MQA;',particularly with regard aa;agricultural;and_`utilliit .issues.. u Y Ni. 3. Options for Council co.risideratio.n include .the ;fol.lowing�_. • Slowdown or stop work on Ah e MOA until the City is in, a position.to finance the CE_ AQ /NEPl� work ;_o.r,.., _ • Place funding of the MOA environmental , process. on :hold until certainty is established at the federal level and' until'fundirid is available. .Und,er both. o.pt ores: the, existing, interi. m;guideiin- es,remain,,in.piace. This means that:mitigationat ratios- s�f1'.1, 2:T. or 3:1 wiliibe�requiredi�ased on:distance from s the profiected resources. 4. At this point the best option for the City of Santa Rosa is to put the MOA'prbcess on hold- untiLmore_certainty._;at, the , ,feder:alaevel.is.gghjQve;d_and until funding is available: The .City. should howeyer, coritinudgmo k'fo achieve the Safe Harbor agreement. `. � ; . : , _... ... FABd of Sups Agenda Items12008106 -24 -08 SR Plain ConservStrat Implem_att:pdf California Tiger Salamander- Funding for Environmental Studies May 13, 2008 City Council Meeting Page 3 of 4 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Department of Community Development and the City Managers Office that the Council, by motion, place funding of the MOA environmental process on hold until certainty is established at the federal level and until funding is available. Author: Chuck Regalia Attachments: none F: \Bd of Sups Agenda Items\2008 \06 -24 -08 SR Plain Consery Strat Implem_att.pdf RECEIVER JOR 2 4 ZUU6 Clerk of the Board Use Only .COUNTY OF SONOMA PARK Meeting Date Held Until CITY OF ROHNERT : GENDA ITEM �° k2 4/ 0$ Agenda Item No: Agenda: Item No: ,,�'S SUMMARY REPORT ,, Department: ( ) 415 Vote Required Sonoma County Water A enc Contact: Phone: Board Date: Deadline for Board Action: Chairman Kerns 1565-2241 06 -24-08 AGENDA SHORT TITLE: Water Project Draft EIR REQUESTED BOARD ACTION(S): Discussion and possible direction to General Manager /Chief Engineer regarding deferral of release of Water Project Draft EIR. CURRENT FISCAL YEAR FINANCIAL IMPACT cXPENDITURES ADD'L FUNDS REQUIRING BOARD APPROVAL Estimated Cost $ -0- Contingencies $ (Fund Name: ) Amount Budgeted $ -0- Unanticipated Revenue $ (Source: ) Other Avail Approp $ Other Transfer(s) $ (Explain below) _ (Source: ) Additional Requested: $ -0- Add'I Funds Requested: $ Explanation (if required): Prior Board Action(s): 05/01107: Update on Water Project Environmental Impact Report 04/18/06: Update on Water Project Environmental Impact Report, Urban Water Management Plan and Restructured Water Supply Agreement 11/09/04: Resolution 04 -1089 directing preparation of an EIR for a Water Supply, Transmission and Reliability Project Alternatives - Results of Non Approval: FILE: Background: -),oard of Directors Chairman Kerns requested that this item be placed on the agenda so that the oard could consider deferring finalizing the Draft EIR for the Water Supply, Transmission, and _. Reliability Project (Water Project). The General Manager /Chief Engineer of the Sonoma County Water Agency had anticipated asking the Board to release the Draft EIR at the June 24 Board Meeting, but the Chairman requests Board discussion and direction on that issue, given the pending proceedings discussed below. In November 2004, the Board directed preparation of an EIR for the Water Project. The objective of the Water Project is to provide a safe, economical, and reliable water supply to meet the defined current and future needs in the Agency's service area. Agency staff and consultants have been working on a Draft EIR, which has gone through administrative review. A summary of the components of the Water Project is attached (A -1). Two other pending proceedings are relevant to consideration of release of the Draft EIR. First, the County of Sonoma is completing its new general plan and approval is anticipated this. fall. Second, the Agency has been consulting with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) under Section 7 of the federal Endangered Species Act regarding the USACE and Agency activities in the Russian River Watershed. NMFS has been preparing a Biological Opinion (BO) for the last three years. Agency staff has been advised by NMFS staff that a draft BO, covering existing Agency operations, has been forwarded by the Santa Rosa Office of NMFS to the NMFS Regional Office in Long Beach for consideration. NMFS staff has advised Agency staff to expect the final BO in September. The California Department of Fish & Game will {hen have 30 days to issue a Consistency Determination under the state ESA. Under the final BO :nd Consistency Determination, the Agency would be protected from liability for any "incidental take" of threatened species caused by existing Agency operations. Existing operations includes not only diversions up to 75,000 acre feet per year but also existing Agency flood control operations, and receipt of this BO is important to the Agency's ability to continue to carry out its ongoing water supply and flood control activities. Water Agency staff will be prepared to respond to Board questions on these issues at the Board Meeting. (last page text) REQUESTED BOARD ACTION(S): Discussion and possible direction to General Manager /Chief Engineer regarding deferral of release of Water Project Draft EIR. Attachments: Water Project Objectives and Components (A -1) On File With Clerk: CLERK OF THE BOARD USE ONLY Board Action (if other than "Requested ") Vote: WATER SUPPLY, TRANSMISSION AND RELIABILITY PROJECT "Water Project" WATER PR03ECT OBJECTIVE Provide a safe, economical, and reliable water supply to meet the defined current and future needs in the Water Agency's service area. WATER PROJECT COMPONENTS Demand Reduction to be built into project: savings from water conservation measures (see Water Conservation Component), recycled water, and use of local supplies including SCWA groundwater wells Water Conservation Component > Required savings of an additional 9,440 AFY through implementation of Tier 1 BMPs, selected Tier 2 BMPs, and New Development Standards (project level) Russian River Component > Increase amount of water released from storage in Lake Sonoma and diverted from the Russian River by 26,000 AFY (from 75,000 to 101,000 AFY) (project level) > Obtain water right permit(s) from SWRCB (project level) > Dry Creek bypass pipeline (program level) designed to cant' project flows in excess of 90 cfs in Dry Creek, or minimum instream flow required by Decision 1610, whichever is higher Transmission and Reliability Component Increase capacity of transmission system by 58.4 mgd, from 92 mgd to 150.4 mgd (plus existing 20 mgd standby), and construction, operation and maintenance of facilities to deliver water to contractors > Water Production Facilities at Russian River (program level) o Radial collector wells, vertical wells, surface water diversion works, infiltration ponds, treatment facilities and/or appurtenances > Pipelines • Mirabel- Cotati Pipeline (program level) • Annadel - Sonoma Pipeline (program level) • Wohler -Santa Rosa Pipeline (program level) • Kawana- Ralphine Pipeline (Bennett Valley Road to Sonoma Booster Pump Station) (program level) • Cotati- Kastania Pipeline (project level) > Storage Tanks: Central, East, South (program level) > Booster Pump Stations: • Central Booster Pump Station (program level) • Sonoma Booster Pump Station Modification(project level) > Other related equipment COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (6/24/08) . . . . . . . . . . ti-P: ak rn N N O O J ;= -0 (D - =)' CD (D Q) 0) 'D a0 0 6 0 a) 0 0 , CL CD CL -0 U) (D (D CD 10 Cl 0 -0 D < 0) N (D —M 0 (D _'D 3 0 �- 0 -0 CD 0 Cn 0 M _-v O gr 0 CD C: CL crz CL En co cn 3. ro M CL CD fl .=r M @ 0 5. W y 3 0 CL 0 (D (D R (D"D 0 CL r CD :3 0 (o 8 0 CD O CD 0) X* p "low Cr 0 I. CD rL (D •T CD rAc q, CD (D -0 0 -0 =r (D =r C) CD (D (D C, CL a) no 01- CL 0 CD 0 :31 CD 3. ro M CL CD fl .=r M @ 0 5. W y 3 0 CL 0 (D (D R (D"D 0 CL r CD :3 0 (o 8 0 CD O CD 0) X* p "low •T rAc q, RM pw Ax Ck) 0 -0 D 0 M CL D a CD =F Z) (D 0 CD W c 0 0 cn = CD (D 0 03 E5. :3 5 ii CX (0 0 W 0 U :3 Z CL ra 0 o 0 CD 0 z -0 CD -O --I 0 0 O �Cn (—D 0 0 cr 0 0 IOU 6 11 U) 5 Sll CD o W 0 0- 3 co :3 C—A @ 0 CD 0 CD 0 CA CD 0 W 3 w CL CD CD (n. 0 ' § a m c 2) cn n 3 o CD (D 0 CD 3-0 O C r_r Co 6 0 = U m < 0 =3 (D CL (D co :3 a CD E; a n n -00 0 n (D -O 0 f- m 0 0 S Cnafifvxnia ,`�'tate '- $mate ALEX PADILLA SENATOR, 20TH DISTRICT �TF June 9, 2008 Dear Colleagues: JUN 17 2008 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK California should be the national leader in the fight against obesity. Each year, approximately 60,000 Californians become obese or overweight, conditions which significantly lead to diabetes, hypertension, and other chronic diseases. Last year, I authored legislation (SB 120) that would have required nutritional information on menus and menu boards of large chain restaurants. While the Legislature voted for the bill and 84% of California's registered voters polled supported the measure, it was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger. I recently introduced SB 1420 which, once again, seeks to require restaurants with 15 or more locations in California to provide nutrition information on menus and menu boards. Recently, the United States District Court ruled that New York City's menu - labeling law is legal, appropriate, and in the public interest. All restaurant chains in New York City with 15 or more locations are now required to post calorie information on menu boards — similar to the provisions of SB 1420. Restaurants such as Starbucks, Jamba Juice, Quizno's, Subway, Johnny Rocket's, IHOP and Chipotle have begun to comply. Last month, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health released a first- of -its- kind study showing that posting calorie information on restaurant menus and menu boards could have a sizable impact on the obesity epidemic, even with modest changes in consumer behavior. The study found that if just 10% of restaurant patrons ordered reduced - calorie meals (average reduction of 100 calories per meal) as a result of the calorie information, it would result in a 40% decrease in the annual weight gain in the county population. Knowledge is power in the fight against obesity. I respectfully request your support for SB 1420. Attached please find a picture of a New York City Starbucks menu board CAPITOL OFFICE: STATE CAPITOL, ROOM 4032 - SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 - TEL (916) 651 -4020 - FAX (916) 324 -6645 gQJ� DISTRICT OFFICE: 6150 VAN NUYS BLVD., SUITE 400 - VAN NUYS, CA 91401 - TEL (818) 901 -5588 - FAx (818) 901 -5562 1 w complying with-menu- labeling a sample resolution if you would like to support this measure, as well as the executive summary of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health study. The full report is available at www.publichealth.lacounty.gov. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (916) 651 -4020. Sincerely, Senator Alex Padilla Menu Labeling as a Potential Strategy for Combating the Obesity Epidemic A Health Impact Assessment Paul Simon, Christopher J. Jarosz, Tony Kuo, and Jonathan E. Fielding Executive Summary Mandated posting of calorie information on menus and menu boards of fast food and other large chain restaurants has garnered growing public and legislative support as a potential strategy for addressing the obesity epidemic. However, no studies to our knowledge have sought to quantify the potential impact of this strategy on the epidemic. To. address this gap, we conducted a health impact assessment of menu labeling, as proposed in California's Senate Bill 120 in 2007 and in the current Senate Bill 1420, on the obesity epidemic in Los Angeles County. Data on population weight gain from the California Department of Education Physical Fitness Testing Program and the Los Angeles County Health Survey were used to quantify the obesity epidemic in Los Angeles County. Additional data to estimate the number of meals served annually at large chain restaurants in the county, the percentage of restaurant patrons that would order reduced calorie meals as a result of menu labeling, and the amount of calorie reductions that would result from patron response to calorie postings were examined using published and unpublished data sources. Multiple scenarios of restaurant patron response to calorie postings were examined to estimate a plausible range of impacts of menu labeling on the obesity epidemic. Using conservative assumptions that calorie postings would result in 10% of large chain restaurant patrons ordering reduced calorie meals, with an average reduction of 1QO calories per meal, and no compensatory increase in other food consumption, menu What is a� He'a" lth llrrmpact Assessment? labeling would avert 38.9% of the 6.75 million pound average annual weight gain in the county Ahealthimpactassessmentisacombirtationefproeedures ,methods; population aged 5 years and older. Substantially and toots try whlCh a pokey, prAgram, or prolec #;may be jud'g "ed in' larger impacts would be realized if higher terrns,of its potential effects on the health ova population, and the percentages of restaurant patrons Ordered distribution of those ef#eets withinaho populat ion. t reduced calorie meals or average per meal calorie t Heath Impact Assessment Main' Cortceps antl, Suggested Approach. reductions increased. These findings suggest 13russeis, Belgium Europeanertre for.- Healt#r Policy. World' Health that mandated menu labeling at fast food and Organization Re &61 Offce for Europe 1999. Gothenburg Consensus g Paper other large chain restaurants could have a sizable salutary impact on the obesity epidemic, even with Avatlable at http /lwww eGro uvfao �nUdocumenUPAE /Gothepburgpaper.pdf. Accessed M' - 2 only modest changes in consumer behavior. ;l.LNDED CREME Strawberries Creme 3.85 370 cal 4 45 4711 cal 5 05 650; oz Vanilla Bear- i 3.30 340 cal 3.9Q:,470 cal 4.50 6001 Chai Tea 1 3.85 340 cal 05 440 cal 5.05 580 Green Tea 1 3.85 370 cal 4.45 490 cal 5.05 650' INVITATION FOR SEALED BIDS CITY OF ROHNERT PARK HIGHWAY 101 & WILFRED AVENUE INTERCHANGES WATER SYSTEM VALVE RELOCATION PROJECT NO. 2006 -17 Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, July 15, 2008, at 2:00 PM at 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, California, the City of Rohnert Park will receive and open sealed bids for the Highway 101 & Wilfred Avenue Interchange Water System Valve Relocation Project, Project No. 2006 -17. Bids must be received by the Engineering Department before 2:00:00 PM on July 15, 2008, based on the Official Bid Clock displayed in the area where bids are submitted. The work is described generally as the relocation of an existing pressure regulating valve station in a new vault and miscellaneous water main improvements near the intersection of Golf Course Drive and Roberts Lake Road and the relocation of one existing fire hydrant on Commerce Boulevard and three existing fire hydrants on Redwood Drive. The miscellaneous water main improvements include approximately 60 LF of 8" water main and abandoning unused portions of existing mains in the project area. The fire hydrant relocations include extending or shortening the existing laterals and installing new hydrants in the locations shown. The Contractor must have a valid California contractor's license, a Class "A" General Engineering contracting License. The Engineer's estimate for this project is approximately $109,450.00. A statement of the prevailing wage rate is on file in the office of the Rohnert Park City Clerk, 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, California. Per California Civil Code Section 3247, a performance bond in the amount of 100% of the bid total will be required from the successful bidder for bids exceeding $25,000. The bond must be provided within fifteen (15) calendar days from notice of award and prior to the performance of any work. For any moneys earned by the Contractor and withheld by the City of Rohnert Park to ensure the performance of the contract, the Contractor may, at their request and sole expense, substitute certain securities equivalent to the amount withheld in the form and manner and subject to the terms and conditions provided in the California Public Contracts Code Section 22300. This notice incorporates by reference the terms, conditions and requirements of the specifications approved by the City, any and all changes or amendments to the specifications and special instructions or special notice issued to or given to prospective bidders. The City of Rohnert Park makes no representation or warranty of the condition of the jobsite. All prospective bidders are requested to carefully review the plans and specifications and to examine and conduct tests or otherwise satisfy themselves as to the conditions at the project site, subject to coordination with the office of the Rohnert Park City Engineer. A mandatory Pre -Bid meeting is to be attended by all bidders and their subcontractors. Meeting will be held at the City of Rohnert Park Council Chamber, 6750 Commerce Blvd., at 10:00 a.m., Tuesday July 1, 2008. Construction site tour will follow meeting. Bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared on said day and hour and referred to and considered by the City Council at a future City Council meeting. A copy of the drawings and specifications may be obtained Brelje & Race Engineering, 5570 Skylane Boulevard, Santa Rosa, California 95403; phone contact (707) 576 -1322. Plans and specifications may be purchased for $40.00 Posted Date: June 18, 2008 /s/ JUDY HAUFF First Published Date: Friday, June 20, 2008 City Clerk of the City of Rohnert Park Second Published Date: Friday, June 27, 2008 Saturday, JlWy 19, 2008 Registration begins at 9:3 a Workshop and counseling ` 0.0 am- 1 :00pnn 3033 Oeveland Avenue, SUite 100 (Redwood Credit Union) Santa Rosa, CA 9540 Resources Available to Help Homeovvners Facing Foreclosure o Information panel with Q &A o Beware of scarps o How to work with lenders How to work with Housing Counseling Agencies _ How to prepare for short sales Special Guest Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey -F+r" 'A Ift o Learn about tenants rights cc: cc* a Individual Counseling Sessions in Spanish and F_ngiish File: o Informational exhibits and take -away materials File: Credit and housing counselors, loan servicers, and lenders will be available for brief individual consultations on a st -come, first - served basis. Please bring your loan documents, monthly budget, and other financial information with you to the workshop! Free Event. Free parking in rear of building. Activities for children, Advanced Registration preferred at: fnlbsfocom PIP` y �117-1 FHLBank San Francisco 27 Larkspur Street, San Rafael, CA 94901 m 415 -454 -4554 ® Fax 415- 454 -4595 ° Contractors Lic. #690064 010r. @ Mtg. Of.. cc: cc* June 12, 2008 File` File: pp Mayor Jake Mackenzie a� je U ti City of Rohnert Park 6750 Commerce Blvd Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Subject: Conservation Corps North Bay Luncheon Dear Mayor Mackenzie: Good news for Sonoma County! The Marin Conservation Corps is expanding to serve Sonoma County youth and young adults and changing our name to Conservation Corps North Bay. Conservation Corps North Bay (CCNB) will give Sonoma County youth and young adults opportunities to gain skills, advance their education, and work on significant environmental projects that improve their community. Given the increase in gang activity CCNB will provide Sonoma youth a positive, constructive alternative to gang life and drugs. CCNB's educational and employment skills program is comprehensive and part of all corpsmembers' experience. We are excited to be able to offer our services to the cities and towns of Sonoma County. Conservation Corps are well known across the country as win -win programs for youth and for their communities. Our Sonoma operations will begin with a small recycling program, and gradually expand to include other environmental and disaster prevention programs. An Invitation You have been identified as one of Sonoma County's prominent leaders, and we would like to invite you to be our guest at an informative luncheon on Friday, June 27th at 12 Noon at the Latitude Restaurant in Rohnert Park (5000 Roberts Lake Road). This luncheon is limited to 20 members of the Sonoma community. This small gathering will introduce our services to you and ask you how we can work together for the betterment of Sonoma County. You might want to check out our current website at www.marincc.or for more information. Please respond to Terry Hennessy, at 415- 454 -4554 x 292 or thennessygmarincc.org. Sincerely, Sincerely, (� p Kerry Mazzoni Marilee Eckert Board Chair Executive Director With thesupport /� Vic^ Itco��, PEPNet MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 7 2006 WINNER G 1'!;l`II Business :p Printed on 100% post consumer recycled acid Gee paper CAPITOL OFFICE STATE CAPITOL ROOM 5114 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 (91 6) 651 -4003 DISTRICT OFFICES SAN FRANCISCO 455 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE SUITE 14800 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 (415) 557 -1300 MARIN / SONOMA 3501 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ROOM 425 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 (41 5) 479-6612 SENATOR. MIGDEN@SEN.CA.GOV June 13, 2008 Taliforniax `tatle ,`&m tjC SENATOR CAROLE MIGDEN THIRD SENATE DISTRICT DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS CHAIR LABOR & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS CHAIR Mayor Jake Mackenzie City of Rohnert Park 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Dear Mayor Mackenzie: COMMITTEES ELECTIONS, REAPPORTIONMENT & CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS NATURAL RESOURCES & WATER PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT if. _ ta.Of: e,)1 ,ca SEIy� cc: cc: File: File: I received your June 2nd letters regarding AB 2153 (Krekorian and Hancock) and AB 2175 (Laird and Feurer). You indicate that these Assembly bills have laudable intentions regarding water supply and consumption but contain problematic language and goals for cities fike Rohnert Park. You also state that the Rohnert Park City Council voted on May 27th to oppose both bills. Please note that AB 2153 has since died on the Assembly floor so, needless to say, it will not be considered by the Senate. _AB,2175, however, will be heard by the Senate Natural Resources Committee on June 241n Rohnert Park's water conservation program and recycled water usage figures are impressive. In addition to your letters, I know, first hand, the city's work on environmental and water - related issues. As you remember, I recently had the pleasure of addressing you and the City Council and valued the exchange we had on these and other topics. I appreciate your evaluation of these bills, suggestions for corrective language and the update on the City Council's opposition. I will take your recommendations into consideration when AB 2175 comes before the Senate Natural Resources Committee. Thank you for serving the residents of Rohnert Park and for sharing your concerns. My staff is also available to assist you. Please feel free to call my Sonoma County Field Representative, Holly Butler, in my district office at (415.) 479-6612. Sincerely,. Carole Migden Senator, 3rd District June 18, 2008 1 RELAY FOR LIFE society x Kvwmic v:., Jake Mackenzie, Mayor C/o CitY Hall 6750 Commerce Boulevard Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Dear Mayor Mackenzie, cc: cc,. File: File: Mtg. �3-. l`fcC�-cnZA- As I am sure you have heard, Rohnert Park/Cotati Relay For Life 2008 is coming up June 28 & 29 at the Creekside Middle School. I appreciated seeing you at last year's event and I hope you can join us again. As Mayor of Rohnert Park, I was hoping that you would consent to saying a few words at the Opening Ceremony on Saturday at about 10 am. This truly is a community event and I know that your community would be pleased to see you there. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. I hope to see you there! Sincerely, Janice Chamberlain, Event Chair 542 -5862 217 -5610 medassist307 @yahoo.com Jake MacKenzie Rohnert Park Mayor 6750 Commerce Blvd Rohnert Park, CA 94928 707 -588 -2226 707 -548 -3419 (cell) 707 -588 -2263 (fax) Dear Jake, i3lW. Q Mtg. Of:' 1d'11U U cc: President: David Lee cc: 7425 Mitchell Drive Files ohnert Park, CA 94928 File: &L�w Z 707 -217 -6508 707 - 794 -8179 (fax) DavidMunLee@aol.com www.DK-Landscgping.com June 12, 2008 It was a pleasure meeting you at the Chamber of Commerce event on Wednesday, June 11, 2008. As I briefly mentioned, my business is growing like crazy and one of our corporate objectives is to give back to the community. Right now we're a very small company, but our vision is to grow like crazy. Presently, for a company our size we're doing a lot for the community. As we get bigger and bigger, our plan is to do more and more for the community. I would love to get together with you over coffee, lunch or dinner and discuss what we can do to contribute to our community. Maybe we can help out with an event that's near and dear to you. Give me a call. Sincerely, David Lee, President Complete Professional Quality Service Insured and bonded Business licerae: 861925 707.2k. M2 Eduardo Rodas Installation Manager/ 707.548.6(;04 Irrigation Specialist 7425 Mitchell Drive, Rohnert Park, CA 94928 www.dklandscaping.com City of Rohnert Park Engineering Department June 18, 2008 Rancho Verde Board of Directors Evan Griffith, President 212 Corte Rosa Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rancho Verde HOA Steve Young, President 301 Corte Rayado Rohnert Park, CA 94928 RE: Rancho Verde Flood Protection Maintenance letter Dear Sirs: Enclosed you will find letter from Mayor Jake Mackenzie dated June 10, 2008, sent to the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding Rancho Verde Flood Protection Maintenance. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (707) 588 -2213, Sincerely, CITY OF ROHNERT PARK bit'v4) e2'� Ellen Beardsley Administrative Assistant Enclosures C : Mayor Jake Mackenzie Stephen R. Donley, City Manager Beth Lidster, Secretary Brian Goodman, Housing and Redevelopment Assistant FILE: Rancho Verde Mobile Home Park City of Rohnert Park • 6750 Commerce Boulevard • Rohnert Park, California 94928 Tel: (707) 588 -2232 • Fax: (707) 588 -2274 Calendar of Events Next Council Meeting June 24, 2008 Wednesday, 6/18 Sonoma County Waste Management Agency 8:30am (TS) Friday, 6/20 Economic Development Board welcomes Dr. Steve Cochrane Recovery or Recession: What's Ahead for Sonoma County 7 -9am. Hyatt Vineyard (TS) Wednesday, 6/25 Economic Development Subcommittee Meeting (AB/Vvm) 1:00 pm Saturday, 6/28 Community Workshop on Sustainability 10am -noon. SMV (sponsored by Planning Dept) Monday, 6/30 Bay Area Water Forum: The Los Angeles Green Solution Project 10:30 -1:30. Oakland (JA4) Wednesday, 7/2 Water Issues Subcommittee meeting 1:OOpm Saturday, 7/12 Cotati Kids Day Parade & Festival 10am -3pm (guests arrive by 9:30am) Parade Staging area next to City Hall (JA4) Tuesday, 7/15 Household Toxic Collections 4 -8pm Community Center Parking Lot Tuesday, 8/5 National Night Out 4:30- 8:30pm. Community Center August 14 Mayors & Councilmembers meeting Santa Rosa [Santa Rosa plans programs] Saturday, 8/23 DPS Explorer Post Pancake Breakfast & Open House 8-1 lam. 5200 Country Club Drive September 11 -13, 2008 16 Annual National League of Cities Leadership Summit Welches, Oregon (Vvm) Thursday, 9/18 Senior Citizens Advisory Commission 1 pm. (PS /AB) Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6 /18 /08 -TG Copy to: ITEM NO. 9Q) Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6118108 -TG Copy to: 2.08.010 Time and place of regular meetings. The city council shall meet in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month beginning at six p.m. until such time as the meeting is adjourned in the city council chambers, City Hall, Rohnert Park, California. The city council may, by majority vote, elect to adjourn the meeting, adjourn a meeting to another time and date, and defer agenda items to the next regular city council meeting. If at any time any regular meeting date falls on a holiday, such regular meeting shall be held on a business day as designated by the council as close to the regular meeting day as possible. If by reason of fire, earthquake, or other emergency it is unsafe to meet in the place designated, then the meeting shall be held of the duration of the emergency at such place as is designated by the mayor. (Ord. 709 § 1, 2004: Ord. 634 § 1, 1997: Ord. 617 § 1, 1996: Ord. 534 § 1, 1991: Ord. 464 § 1, 1986: Ord. 319 § 1, 1976: Ord. 298 § 1, 1975: Ord. 221 § 1, 1974: Ord. 202 § 1, 1973: Ord. 169 § 1, 1972) ©E N N 0 00 � 0 0 J N � A 1 m� M[ 0 N �a a W oxHp w p v� I-- u vi U UP� cn�" I� IN z� •� N CU zo {moo U U oc V b o U x O N � t-I U o o o U ° U w � u � !1 U P ` N A Rp c� b O U b N O x oo 0 0 N G w x ti b 0 x V Li O c� 0 w v an v b CCi U c� b 5U 1" 'I 0 OVA Q oc V b o U x O N � t-I U o 0 H F� to O M Cf) n1 o cd .J b 0 x V Li O c� 0 w v an v b CCi U c� b 5U 1" 'I 0 OVA Q b N N t-I b 0 x V Li O c� 0 w v an v b CCi U c� b 5U 1" 'I 0 OVA y' �1 r v 1 It IN- IN IN bjD N cep N M AGENDA FORECAST Tuesday, July 8, 2008 NOTE: No Packet Delivered Friday, July 4`h 6:00pm — Closed Session 7:00pm - Pledge of Allegiance Consent Calendar 2008 - National Night Out 2008 Individual Items ■ Safety Building Bay Realignment ■ Council Benefits Ordinances Matters from Council Bridging the Town/Gown Divide 10/16 -17 San Luis Obispo Council Committee and /or other Reports Economic Development Subcommittee meeting 6/25 (ABNvm) Water Issues Subcommittee meeting 7/2 (JM/PS) Other: Community Workshop on Sustainability 6/28 Bay Area Water Forum: The Los Angeles Green Solution Project 6/30 (JM) City Manager's /City Attorney's Reports Smoking Ordinance Community Development Rohnert Park FinancinE Authority Council: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6/18/08 -TG Copy to: 1400 K STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 PH: (916)658 -8200 Ex: (916) 658-8240 1 l3iattr. @ Mtg. Of: o LEAGUE I c OF cc: CITIES File: Filea A / I. n ._� `.D WWW.CACITIES.ORG Please review this memo carefully -. New procedures were adopted in 2006 regarding designation of voting delegates and alternates and voting at the Annual Conference. June 13, 2008 TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference — September 24 -27, Long Beach The League's 2008 Annual Conference is scheduled for September 24 -27 in Long Beach. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting, scheduled for 8:30 a.m., September 27, at the Long Beach Convention Center. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the. Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting delegate. In the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity, your city may appoint up to two alternate voting delegates. In 2006, the ability to appoint up to two alternates was the result of approval of a League bylaws amendment that increased the number of voting delegate alternates from one to two. Please complete the attached Voting Delegate form and return it to the League's office no later than September 5, so that voting delegate /alternates records may be established prior to the conference. At the conference, voting delegate forms may be returned to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the conference registration area. Please 'note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting process at the Annual Business Meeting. • Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken, or have your city clerk or mayor sign the form affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone. • Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. At least one must be present at the Business Meeting and in possession of voting card in order to cast a vote. Voting delegates and alternates -more- are requested to pick up their conference badges before -sign ng in and picking up the voting delegate card at the Voting "Delegates - Desk_ `T'hi's *ilj'enable them to receive the special stamps on their name WA&s thaf ' ill`adinif *them into the voting area during the Business Meeting. Transferring Voting Card to Non - Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the Business Meeting, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official. New Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission to this area will be limited to those individuals with a special. stamp on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. If the voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, they should be sure to sign in at the Voting Delegate desk and obtain the special stamps on their badges. The Voting Delegate desk in the conference. registration area will be open September 24, 25 and 26, and prior to the Business Meeting on September 27. The conference registration area will open at 12:00 p.m., on September 24, at the Long Beach Convention Center. The Voting Delegate desk will also be open at the Business Meeting, but not during a roll call vote, should one be undertaken. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share it and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals your council designates as your city's voting delegate and alternates. Once again, thank you for completing the voting delegate and alternate form and returning it to the League office by September 5. If you have questions, please call Mary McCullough at (916) 658 -8247. Attachments: 2008 Amlual Conference Voting Procedures Voting Delegate /Alternate Form I , T 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 ��, tJ Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 OF CALIFORN1A www.cacities.org CITIES Annual Conference Voting Procedures 2008 Annual Conference 1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and. up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration area. We encourage voting delegates and alternates to sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk so that they may receive a special stamp on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the Business Meeting. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who .are voting delegates (or alternates) and who have picked up their city's voting card by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to another city official who is not either a voting delegate or alternate. 6. -Voting -Area at Business Meeting. At the Business. Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special stamp on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. If the city's voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, all should sign in at the Voting Delegate desk and obtain the special stamps on their badges. 7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. LEAGUE CITIES CITY: 2008 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE /ALTERNATE FORM Please complete this form and return it to the League office by September 5, 2008. Forms not sent by this deadline may be submitted to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area. Your city council may designate one voting delegate and up to two alternates. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, voting delegates and alternates must be designated by your city council. Please attach the council resolution as proof of designation. As an alternative, the Mayor or City Clerk may sign this form, affirming that the designation reflects the action taken by the council. Please note: Voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Annual Business Meeting. Admission to this special area will be limited to individuals (voting delegates and alternates) who are identified with a special stamp on their conference badge. If your city's voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together at the Business Meeting, they are all encouraged to sign in at the Voting Desk in order to obtain the identifying stamp that will admit them to the special voting area. 1. VOTING DELEGATE Name: Title: 2. VOTING DELEGATE - ALTERNATE Name: Title: 3. VOTING DELEGATE - ALTERNATE Name: Title: PLEASE ATTACH COUNCIL RESOLUTION DESIGNATING VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATES. ATTEST (I affirm that the information provided reflects action by the city council to designate the votigg delegate and alternate.) Name: Title: Please complete and return by September 5 to: League of California Cities ATTN: Mary McCullough 1400 K Street Sacramento, CA 93814 Phone: Date: FAX: (916) 658 -8240 AC2008 V oti ngDelegateLetter.doc SR will consider wastewater plan I PressDemocrat.com I The back to article =0 Santa Rosa... Page 1 of 3 Miscellaneous 11' f opy to: nn, to* v - SR will consider wastewater plan Board will decide whether to review 6 sites for storage projec that could cost $200 million By MIKE McCOY THE PRESS DEMOCRAT Published: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 at 4:30 a.m. Santa Rosa's Board of Public Utilities on Thursday will consider pursuing a mega- wastewater storage pond program that would rival the $205 million wastewater -to- electricity Geysers project. Deputy City Manager Greg Scoles said the board will decide whether to study six potential sites that individually or together could store up to 500 million gallons of wastewater. Scoles said the price of the 60 -plus acres needed for storage, coupled with construction costs, could run from $50 ❑million to $200 million. Even at that expense, Scoles said, the proposed capacity is only a third of the 1.5 billion gallons the city probably will need to deal with growth expected in Santa Rosa and Rohnert Park through the year 2020. Adding 1.5 billion gallons would double the existing storage, which consists of a half -dozen ponds mostly along Lla -no and Olivet roads, the largest of which is the 634 - million - gallon Delta Pond. Scoles said the cost to create each million gallons of storage could be as low as $100,000 and as much as $400,000. At the upper range, Scoles said, the expense to store 1.5 billion gallons could run as much as $600 million. Wastewater not used for irrigation or piped to The Geysers currently is discharged into the Laguna de Santa Rosa. But increasingly stringent environmental laws probably will force the city to end that practice. To that end it is looking at two alternatives: the Russian River and http: / /www l . pressdemocrat.comlappslpbcs.dll /article ?AID= 1200611151NEWS /611150405... 6/24/2008 SR will consider wastewater plan I PressDemocrat.com I The Press Democrat I Santa Rosa... Page 2 of 3 storage for summer irrigation. Scoles said the cost of building massive storage reservoirs could be eliminated if the city can overcome the environmental problems the wastewater creates when discharged into the low - flowing laguna. However, city leaders promised several years ago that effluent generated by revised growth projections would not be discharged into the river system. Complying with that pledge requires additional storage. Scoles said the six storage sites recommended for further study were culled from a list of 34 sites. Of the six, four are owned by the city. Three are located next to existing ponds . along Llano Road and east of Sebastopol and the fourth is off West College Avenue behind the offices of the Sonoma County Water Agency. One of the private parcels is along Alexander Valley Road and belongs to winemaker John Jordan; the other is owned by Brookfield Homes and located east of Petaluma Hill Road across from Sonoma State University's Green Music Center. Scoles said both landowners are aware of Santa Rosa's interest and both have shown an interest in the project. Wastewater storage in the Alexander Valley has long been proposed to ensure the viability of vineyards as state - mandated constraints on the Russian River and its tributaries limit diversions for irrigation. Brookfield Homes, which plans 1,610 residential units in Rohnert Park, has proposed constructing ponds capable of storing up to 100 million gallons of wastewater. The stored effluent would be used during the summer to irrigate back yards and parks developed as part of Brookfield's. 297-acre development. Brookfield's effort is fueled in part by a lawsuit Rohnert Park settled with nearby Penn -grove well owners four years ago in which the city pledged to cap the amount of water it pumped from the ground. The use of wastewater in the Brookfield Homes project would reduce its potable water use by more than half. The search for additional disposal sites began a few years ago. The Geysers project, which uses 4 billion gallons of wastewater a year to generate electricity, was supposed to handle the wastewater generated by Santa Rosa and http: / /wwwl . pressdemocrat.comlappslpbcs.dll /article ?AID = /20061115 /NEW S /611150405... 6/24/2008 SR to boost Geysers wastewater 35% 1 PressDemocrat.com I The Press Democrat I Santa ... Page 1 of 2 back to article =1 SR to boost Geysers wastewater 35% By MIKE McCOY THE PRESS DEMOCRAT Published: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 at 6:27 a.m. In a deal described as a win - win -win for Santa Rosa, Calpine and the environment, the City Council approved an agreement Tuesday to increase the amount of wastewater pumped to The Geysers by 35 percent. "This puts the city in position to recycle 95 percent of its wastewater. That is unprecedented for a city of its size," said Dave Smith; a city consultant on reuse efforts. The agreement will extend by four years the city's contract to pump wastewater to The Geysers to 2037, and calls for a gradual increase in the amount pumped over the next 30 years. The original contract called for the city to pump 11 million gallons a day, or 4 billion gallons a year, to the steam fields where it is injected underground to produce steam, which is converted to electricity by Calpine, the city's partner in the project. Deputy City Manager Greg Scoles said since the project went into operation in December 2003, 15 billion gallons of wastewater that otherwise would have been discharged into the Laguna de Santa Rosa and Russian River have been used to generate electricity. The agreement calls for the city to increase its daily pumping to 12.6 million gallons a day by this winter and to almost 16 million gallons a day sometime in the distant future. The revised deal drew only accolades and unanimous approval at Tuesday's meeting. Pat Barnes, Rohnert Park's deputy city engineer, said his city "strongly supports" the agreement. Santa Rosa runs the regional sewage treatment system on behalf http: / /www l .pressdemocrat. comlappslpbes.dll /article ?AID= /20070815 /NEW S /70815 006... 6/24/2008 SR to boost Geysers wastewater 35% 1 PressDemocrat.com I The Press Democrat I Santa ... Page 2 of 2 of itself, Rohnert Park, Cotati and Sebastopol "We believe it's the right thing for the environment, the right thing for ratepayers, and it's the right thing for green power," he said. Windsor Town Manager Matt Mullan, whose city has an agreement with Santa Rosa to use the pipeline to ship its wastewater to nearby vineyards and potentially The Geysers, also hailed the agreement. "We support t e production Cofhigh-quality, clean- burning energy," he said. Scol /said increased pumping to The Geysers will reduce the amount of effluent the city discharges into the laguna by 70 percent most years and to zero discharge in some years. That will not only help the city meet stricter state discharge standards but also C save up to $200 million that the city might have had to spend to shift its main discharge location to the Russian River and build additional storage reservoirs for other disposal options. The project also should help Calpine, which has been in bankruptcy since 2005. The Geysers project is one of the company's most profitable assets, and its amended contract with the city is scheduled to be reviewed by a federal bankruptcy court on Sept. 11. If the court approves the deal, Scoles said, the city could begin pumping more wastewater almost immediately. Estimates are the wastewater the city has been pumping to Calpine generates 68 megawatts of power, enough to power 68,000 homes. Calpine estimates the extra wastewater it will receive i-n later years will be enough to boost its power production to 85 megawatts. That would power 85,000 homes — roughly Santa Rosa and Rohnert Park combined. The city's cost to boost its pumping capacity will run around $2.3 million. The deal calls for Calpine to pay the city $300,000 for the first 15 years, an amount city officials said should cover the annual cost to pump the extra wastewater to The Geysers. http: / /wwwl .pressdemocrat.com/ apps /pbcs.dll /article ?AID= /20070815 /NEW S /70815006... 6/24/2008 cDc- Work Sessi,rN Qistr. @ Mtg. Of. cc: cc: File: File: City of Rohnert Park Community Development Commission 2008/09 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget Redevelopment - Recent Key Accomplishments *Sonoma Mountain Business Incubator Loan •New City Website •Community Center Master Plan *City Center Downtown Plaza & Pedestrian Improvements "City Center Property Acquisitions *Project Manager & Construction Manager Services - Public Safety Bay Re- Alignment - Community Center ADA and Beam Replacement Project - Corridor Studies - Eastside Trunk Sewer Line Phase I - Neighborhood Enhancement Program Business Incubator City Center Plaza Fire Bay Re- Alignment ,_ SONOMA MOUNTAIN BUSINESS CLUSTER H Housing - Recent Key Accomplishments *Vida Nueva Land Disposition •Acquisition of 100 Avram & 120 Avram Avenue •Acquisition of 6750 Commerce Boulevard -Maintenance/ Repair of 5 CDC owned Shared Living Homes •CalHome Award •Copeland Creek Apartments Improvements •Arbors L.P. Subordination *Sonoma Grove Homeless Prevention Program 100 Avram, 120 Avram & Arbors Copeland Creek Apartments Rohnert Park CDC 2008 -09 Fiscal Year n, , Redevelopment - Key Objectives -City Center Plaza and Pedestrian Improvements completion Community Plaza and Campus Improvements Public Safety Bay Re- Alignment - Chamber of Commerce Executive Director -New City Website -City Center Mixed -use Development - Update Five Year Implementation Plan Corridor Improvements City Center Mixed -use Chamber of Commerce 2 �llohnert Park CDC 2008 -09 Fiscal Year Housing - Key Objectives -Vida Nueva Completion •Avram Avenue Affordable Housing Project -Southwest Blvd. Affordable Housing -City Center. Mixed Use w/ 15% Affordable Units •Affordable Housing Database •General Plan - Housing Element Update 435 Southwest Blvd. Vida Nueva Housing Element Update O PlvY N 1 P ktiS G ENEfRAL 12- 1 PLAN tr4! Proposed Construction Projects FY 2007/08 2007R Bond Proceeds $35,290,617 - Actual .,fill lf�iiJ.;if °ij]lljj ih 1. -1i 11j�l, 1, ll3!- V( iIjj{{{j�: i, tl1, ll,,t'!t l; i, jl('], 1, 11t jj{ jl4 ',i'ttt'I,If,!!'tt��3,jjjlli�l �;ilu�, Iji�!�li 3l'ii311I ] }f .j,.�,6f1j 111.!III,li1I�_I l3?]I.�LI��Il j�3 ljf llltllj ItI „�]l. 1ljlllltl4i;jlllllil!!1j 111, ]I, {ijil -,jl It 1,g�3mated.Bandljl ,j , { 1)iil3 11111 !t �! �,{ll;:l; 11 i3I., })i, jl,i yr„ ni„ llii�jj7,.�,ijh,.,,;I;i,,,l.,ff ff,f! t 111 ,, , ,i,1 Ya!i1IN iillai. 6i�i,�1��j (I1131� {tl3�li�Ili.j!�'3 1{ I��I�{j�,illli�'f1�i11171�S31iti 1, i lY 1II) �1i�l, t,.Lnl� �Il ;fll lllli .t !�.j;+ 111 ontribu 3dpFf•I 111 (I...i11 �.7Ai �,A i>7it.. I.I :ia 111 ;t 1j]lal3yl,l It ltt- ,,F,Ltnd4rig�l �:i�;. la},i1..G:!Ir111n t..i i lf llp o.lii 1111 -0ll 1111,!(11 1!111q6! tllh l {plItdppl, L]fy]yl{l L,}.i�lj, il?,;I- Illl.iWpWp„�1�{ it ! ij .0 jlll� I� y O�, f0i1 i77s bJ1 q, it I 1 0 ]% sjjl�#c atl37s �t o' rrjj I !! { N 11�"a Community Center Plaza & Campus Improvements 500,000 2007R Bonds (FY 2007/08 Actual 63,000; FY 2008/09 Budget 20.00) Sonoma Mountain Village Business Incubator 500,000 2007R Bonds (Completed) 1 i i 7 .111 i!] Ilt( ! 1ljf 1113) 1111 t .11111 �llll��l 14 �I �111iI� Il. =1 I !,' �Ilj� ill) 16G i f., -fl�i l �11�l3i 11]7 },I }:Ijj 1l h1�1�d�1�xYfaY ie ttg t}}e#It Sid iai1�4Ft 11, 1jq4DO,Q001 I 111:1 1! 1 �,3ft lj, llfllll't 1 }{ It 1II 17)1 Iii. 1 1 t)ttTR Btln'ds 11�, 1 yy�! ii¢} 4� 11 1''I�h. "jt� �d1 I 1 r � �?I3 hj! ��l1 , ] ! fi � I I Il {Ill 1! � I.. jllp: j i�l�! I3lijij�lt!I }ii1�111jj�1, 11 j "1" 1 Ij�.11f 1jI1! d 1�i 3Q �11� }iji �illt 13111 j111 t� ��I. �!! ,1,,�,,,,, !C fj l) I,P 1 111 7 11{11 �aa'�1,�>d�d��. , ,..f �.f,,,l ,,,, .�i, t,,1.f�11Ul. Ella f. l,.lf1.317111�II i.ial;j ,l}l lll ll}ln!i,U1ls City Center Drive Area Property Acquisition 4,500,000 2007R Bonds (FY 2007/08 Actual 1,650,000 Actual; FY 2008/09 Budget 3350 000) 3ij f,l'11j, l fllilill; {13j,1 Ill) jl 3 3,, lip I itj]l 1 11 qit i,� 1IIi !ll I {tlt �(, {i�iljljhlj j ,j X111 {l? °II 1 11 jj� } {�ll�lj {111Ujl1l lj��1111�'iT g�(y�����(�7�Rt�pT7t }q��l;����{,3},i,�}� nl,Y1p{l lil �I�11 f111lllll lil I! i!I 1I ICI ljl {t ti lfl 3171, 1;1111 �lI �i �VpjO�iQQ�lll�i Il 1 .j?:i df tll,Il��l ],,i1 t a,i jl�iO�iREB4�S1�1i l3li'llljj'�lllldi.',a!?4 Community Center ADA Improvements and Beam Replacement 670,000 2007R Bonds (Completed) l►7 Proposed Construction Projects FY 2008/09 2007R Bond Proceeds $26,137,049 — Actual Remaining Estimated FY 2007108 Carryover $11,783,000 {i, ii +ti !; •t. { i{ !, {I{ i +,t�l 47 1 r{ (I {f!?q;; i3 h) )I I, i I id i('t ,.iij i I 22'1111 ; + 1�1 �Q�;;:I �,�l1! �i!�,11 {j1,1,111,:;,t '•1, »III! »E91'ii'1,t,� "I'� „ »!I. 'I” �, r °111'io,ill' "�liii'�I'i,»7lI+', )I �'{i.j:'f(l((,Iii+ ! i, Iia. . > +,I, s,d ( ,,! ;,��(L.',11,,yy,,�}.,,,,' „!'I, II ; ,:" E',,7i.!�r,t{I� p('1�: City Center Drive Area Property - Public Improvements 1,499,617 2007R Bonds !!!i(i'» �!!,1,,J ': I11!IIii)i i ) :1113 T Community Center Plaza & Campus Improvements 2,000,000 2007R Bonds f 11111 °211!1 .I;j�,Iij�if!3! �!ii! {; �ullil�!Iit��.) f1{iii �t! 1 iI {f# ffiI I�l1I�IiEi EI Ii,l,l' i119iIa1!�i ! It iljl3l�i Ilppi i �{ I!i'11I,;731I�1 {ll {211!111, ,U,.!,t,' III I•;,li'j 11 }IJJi � t {E {ijl ��'! {Q�I{ Q a(p`litint (1,, I �i,iyll 111'1 r1 �l,+j'� "I'�Iii lY li;li»!!'!ii,37;11IM i- 9' {t'�.lia °11111131 {iliv rrtlli3 +lfl'Ii;k!!,!1' �til�iiT!i, N � ! , IL;ilj3!'�i''1i!!k {I {Ill {11'11 ; ! €, tlaa 3jlin I!!`f, E,hl �blb ,r}1e� {I• (( { { {! {�11i {;11Ilu!tl�n.f il�,Iii -,i!{ #i� $s.i�•4.ii!,1, kI!'!lu{' n'ii llfl!'1ji 1117 {'11'22 }f +i i (]; i ' it I i' (t ' ,i'r,1 f 000,OtjQl {( {'((! . d; �.._, l JI I! i(ihi. ��1 �,lii+ {III � i ltlir!� "I. 1!!111,7 '; i ,i'.. "? . '1dYj7R t3onds �� �,II7li7 4.,;. (IV','' 1 f,)L„:1I -1 d1i Proposed Construction Projects FY 2009/10 El! {3 -Ij� Ili I'll ! Nil 111' 3,1!11, �!;�'. {j�ii�u� �! UUi llIi {1I1{ �l i,.- ,,{ it 1 1! 1` i»il {3 {I, I,I { 1�i1,1,) 1122 IIU !t li.,a i {pl' { i({ i'3fii l ! I � - u „t t !f +ri!i II( (i' { 44 I �{J:.:. .., 1.,. ''j':::i; fI . Std imla '� III i- i - � ,!, a' � "�''l��C�►tj�7..lii'. I1II'�I' West Side Public Safety 4,000,000 2007R Bonds (1 I -: {,� Iii)- uy, (fn + {�!i!7�I�71 »; ±1,11 »11' V II! uilil,i7,I „! +{1lfll!Iillt an'1 at1�$'�mpP� efts• ' Il I, 1411 11 ,y 2 }g00,gd0 , i i , t { �0�7R,Bgrllsj :.;'lllli {'1111 Road Widening Which Benefit Project Area 1,000,000 2007R Bonds 7Projects III +1l, f ql {N'iili!'7I V3'Pr14ni'jl;i ,, {I. I{ ➢ ,. Lfogt000, , 1' 'IiQOR BQnS'i, �iufll Ii11 ill!,1i 111(2,11 {f 1'11 {, {1,13,1' »i i "�V1 ±))±�� {,1'..,_!I "III !11',1{ nl3')!i!.f:I,I fil, i'I" ;;) 1 1.'11 Ii!} Funds allocated to the Eastside Sewer Line Project, in FYs 2007/08 and 2008109, will be repaid to the CDC for other projects. These funds, which originated from the non - housing bond proceeds, when repaid can be utilized for both housing and non - housing projects. El! Proposed Housing Projects FY 2007108 2007H Bond Proceeds $25,785,289 - Actual 12 1 ME 11 111, IMMI, I I I 1IIIIIIIIIIIIIN 111111 JIM! M,! rA ff# V MOO�!!� S�MO& d' Affordable Housing & Loan Agreement for 2007H Development of Former City Hall and Avram Sites $5,110,000 Bonds (No FY 2007/08 Bond Contribution; FY 2008/09 Budget 5,110,000) 77 P007H pe I ', hdC Edk t 0006 ' Bon Is J Proposed Housing Projects FY 2008109 2007H Bond Proceeds $20,299,294 - Actual Estimated FY 2007108 Carryover $5,110,000 IPotential Property Acquisition & Development 8,600,000.00 2007H I Bonds Acquisition of Abandoned Southwest 10 I Safety Station for Affordable Housing Public I 850,000.00 Bonds 07H I Proposed Housing Projects FY 2009110 !'i•'1,i, �,i �' � II;II i!. � � :111'1 {111 i {{ EI � (,�i� i I 1 'III +1 + ,,.., i {,: 1 1!�' � � {l I �� ii ( ( {' !I' iI }I t I VIII � �1�IV;i;il��;�I� I � ��) ��•�if� E � �!� "'i'i ��ii{l � � il��l� � � II °,1;,11!1 ,.I ! ((+ 1{ l 11111 i7 • I,1, !, , ;"�1h , �l!'t1 fl�iti�P jl11 { 1�l.1! ( ! I,� i:l �,tT", ��+Ik,l{ Eie i, i !n I j , !I { EI: ILINI 1,,,3 ��h �E; , I Residehtial Inlfil4 Devseipptr{n[��� lfarious'�ossible 2007H''� 365 $1,,289 � Bondi Funds allocated to the Eastside Sewer Line Project, in FYs 2007/08 Rebuilding Together and 2008/09, will be repaid to the CDC for other projects. These (FY 2007/08 funding $50,000; increase of $10,000 for $60,000 funds, which originated from the non - housing bond proceeds, when S.C.A.Y.D. Homeless Prevention repaid can be utilized for both housing and non - housing projects. (FY 2007 /08 funding $130,000) FY 08109 Funding Requests COTS Support Services $4,000 (HUD- funded match - transitional home) COTS Program Supplemental_ Support $60,500 (FY 2007/08 funding $61,042) COTS Social Services for Vida Nueva $50,000 ($75,000 annual funding commitment 5- years) COTS Construction Reserve $25,000 (No prior- funding commitment) Rebuilding Together (FY 2007/08 funding $50,000; increase of $10,000 for $60,000 emergency repairs) S.C.A.Y.D. Homeless Prevention $137,500; (FY 2007 /08 funding $130,000) S.C.A.Y.D. Rental Assistance for Sonoma Grove $15,000 Total Funding Requests $352,000 City of Rohnert Park Community Development Commission Questions CAC VJ OINK t&b51 ON Distr. @ Mtg. Of:. cc: cc: File: File: PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR SERIES 2007R TAX ALLOCATION BONDS ($35,290,617) NON- HOUSING 3 r 2Q07l08:FISCA. UAL EAR r PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION City Center Plaza Pedestrian Improvements $2,000,000 ($1,957,335 — Plaza and $1,162,349 pedestrian improvement minus $1,150,000 TLC rant) $1,500,000 Community Center Plaza and Campus $500,000 Improvements $2,000,000 Sonoma Mountain Village Business Incubator $500,000 — per agreement Public Safety Bay Realignment $2,000,000 Note: an additional $400k from the 1999 bond & Traffic Si nalization series will be used for this project Eastside Sewer Line $8,976,000 City Center Drive Area Property Acquisition $4,500,000 Martin Avenue Flood Control Phase 2 $1,000,000 Westside Flood Miti ation) Community Center ADA Improvements and $670,000 Beam Replacement TOTAL 1 $20,070,000 f PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION City Center Drive Area Property $1,499,617 Acquisition/public improvements Corridor Studies public improvements (staff $1,500,000 will seek matching fund opportunities) Community Center Plaza and Campus $2,000,000 Improvements Mixed -Use component Avram Develo ment $1,000,000 TOTAL $5,800,000 PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION West Side Public Safety $4,000,000 (Project estimate is $15M. It is anticipated that the PFFP and the Tribe will contribute approx $7.25M— The CDC may be asked to pay the difference. Should the $8.9M* come back to the CDC it could provide additional funding) Community Center Plaza and Campus $2,000,000 Road Widening Projects which benefit the $1,000,000 ( *should the $8.9 come back to the CDC, the CDC Project Area may wish to provide an additional funding) Performing Arts Center Improvements $721,000 Corridor Studies public improvements (staff $1,500,000 will seek matching fund opportunities) TOTAL 1013943v2 80121/0003 2091/1 FISCAL YAI2..... PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION TOTAL 2091/1 FISCAL YAI2..... PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION TOTAL *It is anticipated that the funds allocated for the Eastside Sewer Line project from FY 2007/08 will be repaid to the CDC for other projects. These funds, which originated from the non - housing bond proceeds, when repaid, can be utilized for both housing and non - housing projects. Other non - housing projects the CDC may want to consider funding, should funds become available, include: Additional funding for Westside Public Safety Facility; Additional funding for Road Widening program; Re -use of closed school sites; reuse of the Yardbirds site on Commerce Blvd.; Senior Center expansion ($146k identified in PFFP); Undergrounding of overhead utilities for aesthetic and accessibility reasons; Replacement of sidewalks and curb ramps for accessibility reasons; Decommission or conversion of swimming pools in the Project Area to spray pads; Implementation of elements of the Creek Master Plan/Creek Restoration. Note: CDC staff will be pursuing grant opportunities as available to assist with funding the projects listed above. 1013943v2 80121/0003 0 D 00K.K X546 1 Distr. @ Mtg. Of: / / / 0 0 cc: cc: File: PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR SERIES 2007H TAX ALLOCATION BONDS ($25,785,2 HOUSING PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION City Hall Site Reuse and other property $5,000,000 acquisitions for affordable housing Affordable Housing & Loan Agreement for $5,110,000 (estimated maximum of 73 units at $70,000 per development of former City Hall and Avram unit) Sites Energy efficiency /sustainability $1,200,000 improvements /housing rehabilitation TOTAL 1 $11,310,000 1 PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION Residential in -fill development — various $1,365,289 possible sites including: Southwest Blvd. Area, *$4,000,000 Sonoma Mountain Village Area, Downtown Area, Commerce Blvd. Area TOTAL 1 $1,365,289 1 ` .20.10/11 FISC.�1I. YEAR, , PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION Residential development within downtown $1,600,000 mixed use City Center Area Potential property acquisition and development $8,600,000 Residential in -fill development — various $1,500,000 possible sites including: Southwest Blvd. Area, Sonoma Mountain Village Area, Downtown Area, Commerce Blvd. Area Acquisition of abandoned Southwest Public $850,000 Safety Station for affordable housing Development of abandoned Southwest Public $560,000 (estimated 8 units at $70,000 per unit) Safety Site for affordable housing TOTAL $13,110,000 PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION Residential in -fill development — various $1,365,289 possible sites including: Southwest Blvd. Area, *$4,000,000 Sonoma Mountain Village Area, Downtown Area, Commerce Blvd. Area TOTAL 1 $1,365,289 1 ` .20.10/11 FISC.�1I. YEAR, , PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION TOTAL 1013944v2 80121/0003 *It is anticipated that the funds allocated for the Eastside Sewer Line project from FY 2007/08 will be repaid to the CDC for other projects. These funds, which originated from the non - housing bond proceeds, when repaid can be utilized for both housing and non - housing projects. Other affordable housing projects the CDC may want to consider funding, should funds become available, include: Residential in -fill development at various sites including the Southwest Blvd. Area, Sonoma Mountain Village Area, Downtown Area, Commerce Blvd. Area; Residential development within Specific Plan Annexation Areas; Rehabilitation projects (multi- family and single family residences); Residential development at closed school sites. Note: CDC staff will be pursuing grant opportunities as available to assist with funding the projects listed above. 1013944v2 80121/0003 PROJECT ESTIMATED BOND CONTRIBUTION TOTAL *It is anticipated that the funds allocated for the Eastside Sewer Line project from FY 2007/08 will be repaid to the CDC for other projects. These funds, which originated from the non - housing bond proceeds, when repaid can be utilized for both housing and non - housing projects. Other affordable housing projects the CDC may want to consider funding, should funds become available, include: Residential in -fill development at various sites including the Southwest Blvd. Area, Sonoma Mountain Village Area, Downtown Area, Commerce Blvd. Area; Residential development within Specific Plan Annexation Areas; Rehabilitation projects (multi- family and single family residences); Residential development at closed school sites. Note: CDC staff will be pursuing grant opportunities as available to assist with funding the projects listed above. 1013944v2 80121/0003 CDC: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6/18/08 -TG Copy to: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION BILLS FOR APPROVAL June 24, 2008 Checks 5024 - 5036 Dated June 6 - 18, 2008 $29,866.29 TOTAL $29,866.29 Agenda Packet Preparation TIMELINES for Regular City Council Meetings held on the 2nd & 4`'' Tuesdays of each month: Resolutions (other than standard formats for authorizations and approvals), Ordinances & Agreements to Assistant City Attorney via email for review and approval as to form DUE no later than NOON Three (3) Mondays prior to Council meeting date Agenda Items w /attachments via email and hard copy to City Clerk DUE no later than NOON Two (2) Mondays prior to Council meeting date Agenda Draft review by Mayor, City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, City Clerk no later than Tuesday morning One (1) week prior to Council meeting date Agenda Packets distributed to City Council and Agendas posted/distributed /mailed on Wednesday afternoon One (1) week prior to Council meeting date in compliance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 2.08.050 {This section.for City Clerk Use Only) CDC RESO. NO. 2008-08 CDC: X Miscellaneous Communications Agenda: 6124108 X 6/18/08 -TG Copy to: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 Department: Community Development Submitted By: Linda Babonis, Interim Housing and Redevelopment Manager (Name & Title) Submittal Date: June 11, 2008 Agenda (subject Only) Title: Expenditure of Funds Prior to the Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 Community Development Commission ( "CDC ") Budget Requested Council Action: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the Expenditure of Funds Prior to the Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 Budget Summary: The Community Development Commission's Budget for the Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 will not be approved before the end of this fiscal year. In order to continue the CDC's daily operations, the CDC must adopt a resolution authorizing the expenditure of funds beyond the end of this fiscal year for usual and necessary expenditures including, but not limited to, expenditures for contract services previously authorized by the CDC. Enclosures: Resolution GENERAL COUNSEL'S REVIEW: Relevant documents for this agenda item have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION: onsent Item ( ) Regular Time ?,PApproval () Public Hearing Required ( ) Not Recommended () Submitted with Comment ( ) Policy Determination by CD ( ) City Comments: Executive Director's Signature: Date: (Revised 507) :TG- S:05 -b RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -08 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS PRIOR TO THE ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2008 -2009 BUDGET WHEREAS, the budget of the Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park ( "CDC ") for Fiscal Year 2008 -2009 has not been approved; WHEREAS, the CDC's daily operations require the expenditure of funds for usual and necessary expenditures including, but not limited to, expenditures for contract services previously authorized by the CDC; and WHEREAS, this resolution is intended to carry forward the prior fiscal year's appropriations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park that it does hereby authorize and approve expenditures of funds for usual and necessary expenditures, including those previously approved by the CDC prior to the 2008 -2009 Budget adoption. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2008. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Chair ATTEST: Secretary SR will consider wastewater plan I PressDemocrat.com I The Press Democrat I Santa Rosa... Page 1 of 3 back to article CLOSED SESSION 2211L i, Miscellaneous to: m• SR will consider wastewater plan Hoard will decide whether to review 6 sites for storage project that could cost $200 million By MIKE McCOY THE PRESS DEMOCRAT Published: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 at 4:30 a.m. Santa Rosa's Board of Public Utilities on Thursday will consider pursuing a mega - wastewater storage pond program that would rival the $205 million wastewater -to- electricity Geysers project. Deputy City Manager Greg Scoles said the board will decide whether to study six potential sites that individually or together could store up to 500 million gallons of wastewater. Scoles said the price of the 60 -plus acres needed for storage, coupled with construction costs, could run from $50 ❑million to $200 million. Even at that expense, Scoles said, the proposed capacity is only a third of the 1.5 billion gallons the city probably will need to deal with growth expected in Santa Rosa and Rohnert Park through the year 2020. Adding 1.5 billion gallons would double the existing storage, which consists of a half -dozen ponds mostly along Lla -no and Olivet roads, the largest of which is the 634 - million - gallon Delta Pond. Scoles said the cost to create each million gallons of storage could be as low as $100,000 and as much as $400,000. At the upper range, Scoles said, the expense to store 1.5 billion gallons could run as much as $600 million. Wastewater not used for irrigation or piped to The Geysers currently is discharged into the Laguna de Santa Rosa. But increasingly stringent environmental laws probably will force the city to end that practice. To that end it is looking at two alternatives: the Russian River and http: / /www l .pressdemocrat. com /apps /pbcs. dll /article ?AID= /200611151NEW S/61115 0405... 6/24/2008 SR will consider wastewater plan I PressDemocrat.com I The Press Democrat I Santa Rosa... Page 2 of 3 storage for summer irrigation. Scoles said the cost of building massive storage reservoirs could be eliminated if the city can overcome the environmental problems the wastewater creates when discharged into the low- flowing laguna. However, city leaders promised several years ago that effluent generated by revised growth projections would not be discharged into the river system. Complying with that pledge requires additional storage. Scoles said the six storage sites recommended for further study were culled from a list of 34 sites. Of the six, four are owned by the city. Three are located next to existing ponds along Llano Road and east of Sebastopol and the fourth is off West College Avenue behind the offices of the Sonoma County Water Agency. One of the private parcels is along Alexander Valley Road and belongs to winemaker John Jordan; the other is owned by Brookfield Homes and located east of Petaluma Hill Road across from Sonoma State University's Green Music Center. Scoles said both landowners are aware of Santa Rosa's interest and both have shown an interest in the project. Wastewater storage in the Alexander Valley has long been proposed to ensure the viability of vineyards as state - mandated constraints on the Russian River and its tributaries limit diversions for irrigation. Brookfield Homes, which plans 1,610 residential units in Rohnert Park, has proposed constructing ponds capable of storing up to 100 million gallons of wastewater. The stored effluent would be used during the summer to irrigate back yards and parks developed as part of Brookfield's 297-acre development. Brookfield's effort is fueled in part by a lawsuit Rohnert Park settled with nearby Penn -grove well owners four years ago in which the city pledged to cap the amount of water it pumped from the ground. The use of wastewater in the Brookfield Homes project would reduce its potable water use by more than half. The search for additional disposal sites began a few years ago. The Geysers project, which uses 4 billion gallons of wastewater a year to generate electricity, was supposed to handle the wastewater generated by Santa Rosa and http: / /www l . pressdemocrat. com/appslpbcs. dl llarti cle? AID= 12006 1 1 1 51NE W S161115 0405 ... 6/24/2008 SR will consider wastewater plan I PressDemocrat.com I The Press Democrat I Santa Rosa... Page 3 of 3 its three partners - Rohnert Park, Cotati and Sebastopol. But Santa Rosa and Rohnert Park revised their general plans after The Geysers project was selected in 1998, allowing for more residential development, so additional disposal methods became necessary. Scoles said the bulk of the costs will be paid through increased sewer connection fees on new development and by partners who may want a share of the wastewater for agricultural and urban irrigation or energy production. Scoles said some of the cost may fall to existing ratepayers if the city is required to stop using the laguna for discharges. "If you add the discharge relocation costs and the need for additional storage, you're talking a really big number," he said. Scoles noted that the estimated storage costs do not include $119 million the city expects to spend to install a network of pipelines throughout the southwest and southeast quadrants to deliver the stored wastewater for landscape irrigation. http: / /www l .pressdemocrat. com /apps /pbcs. dl l /article ?AID= /20061 1 1 51NEW S/61115 0405... 6/24/2008 SR to boost Geysers wastewater 35% 1 PressDemocrat.com I The Press Democrat I Santa ... Page 1 of 2 back to article SR to boost Geysers wastewater .35% By MIKE McCOY THE PRESS DEMOCRAT Published: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 at 6:27 a.m. In a deal described as a win - win -win for Santa Rosa, Calpine and the environment, the City Council approved an agreement Tuesday to increase the amount of wastewater pumped to The Geysers by 35 percent. "This puts the city in position to recycle 95- percent of its wastewater. That is unprecedented for a city of its size," said Dave Smith, a city consultant on reuse efforts. The agreement will extend by four years the city's contract to pump wastewater to The Geysers to 2037, and calls for a gradual increase in the amount pumped over the next 30 years. The original contract called for the city to pump 11 million gallons a day, or 4 billion gallons a year, to the steam fields where it is injected underground to produce steam, which is converted to electricity by Calpine, the city's partner in the project. Deputy City Manager Greg Scoles said since the project went into operation in December 2003, 15 billion gallons of wastewater that otherwise would have been discharged into the Laguna de Santa Rosa and Russian River have been used to generate electricity. The agreement calls for the city to increase its daily, pumping to 12.6 million gallons a day by this winter and to almost 16 million gallons a day sometime in the distant future. The revised deal drew only accolades and unanimous approval at Tuesday's meeting. Pat Barnes, Rohnert Park's deputy city engineer, said his city "strongly supports" the agreement. Santa Rosa runs the regional sewage treatment system on behalf http: / /www 1. pressdemocrat.comlappslpbcs.dll /article ?AID= /20070815 /NEW S /70815006... 6/24/2008 SR to boost Geysers wastewater 35% 1 PressDemocrat.com l The Press Democrat I Santa ... Page 2 of 2 of itself, Rohnert Park, Cotati and Sebastopol "We believe it's the right thing for the environment, the right thing for ratepayers, and it's the right thing for green power," he said. Windsor Town Manager Matt Mullan, whose city has an agreement with Santa Rosa to use the pipeline to ship its wastewater to nearby vineyards and potentially The Geysers, also hailed the agreement. "Ve support the production of high - quality, clean- burning energy," he said. Scoles said increased pumping to The Geysers will reduce the amount of effluent the city discharges into the laguna by 70 percent most years and to zero discharge in some years. That will not only help the city meet stricter state discharge standards but also could save up to $200 million that the city might have had to spend to shift its main discharge location to the Russian River and build additional storage reservoirs for other disposal options. The project also should help Calpine, which has been in bankruptcy since 2005. The Geysers project is one of the company's most profitable assets, and its amended contract with the city is scheduled to be reviewed by a federal bankruptcy court on Sept. 11. If the court approves the deal, Scoles said, the city could begin pumping more wastewater almost immediately. Estimates are the wastewater the city has been pumping to Calpine generates 68 megawatts of power, enough to power 68,000 homes. Calpine estimates the extra wastewater it will receive in later years will be enough to boost its power production to 85 megawatts. That would power 85,000 homes — roughly Santa Rosa and Rohnert Park combined. The city's cost to boost its pumping capacity will run around $2.3 million. The deal calls for Calpine to pay the city $300,000 for the first 15 years, an amount city officials said should cover the annual cost to pump the extra wastewater to The Geysers. http: / /wwwl .pressdemocrat.com/ apps /pbes.dll /article ?AID= /20070815 /NEW S /70815006... 6/24/2008