2002/01/08 City Council MinutesCITY OF ROHNERT PARK CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES for:
CITY COUNCIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY
January 8, 2002
Tuesday
The concurrent meetings of the City of Rohnert Park for
the City Council, the Community Development Commission,
and the Rohnert Park Financing Authority, met this date in
regular session for a regular meeting to commence at
6:45 p.m. in the City Offices, 6750 Commerce Boulevard,
Rohnert Park, with Mayor Flores presiding.
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Flores called the regular session to order at
6:50 p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance.
ANNOUNCEMENT:
At 6:50 p.m., Mayor Flores ANNOUNCED that due to
technical problems with the cable transmission, the
City Council meeting would not be broadcast this
evening. The Mayor then apologized to the viewing
public and noted that the session would still be
recorded.
ROLL CALL:
Present: (5) Councilmembers Mackenzie, Reilly, and
Vidak- Martinez; Vice Mayor Spiro; and
Mayor Flores
Absent: (0) None
Staff present for all or part of the meeting: City
Manager Netter, City Attorney Strauss, Assistant City
Manager Donley, Planning and Community Development
Director Kaufman, City Engineer Gaffney, and Recreation
Director Barry.
amity oL Honnert rarx - uuNuuHHEN -i- mEE -ziNu6 yri7 J"J
January 8, 2002 Page(2 )
REMEMBRANCE:
Mayor Flores noted the passing of longtime resident and
community activist Clara Brown Umland, who served on the
Cultural Arts Commission and worked at City High School.
He indicated that services will be held at the Church of
Jesus Christ on Country Club Drive tomorrow at 11:00 a.m.
1. MAYOR'S REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION:
Mayor Flores reported on the closed session which
commenced at approximately 6:00 p.m. to discuss matters
listed on the agenda attachment, representing an update.
LITIGATION MATTERS:
1. Las Casitas et al. v. City of Rohnert Park: Nothi
to report.
2. Claim of Iry Sutley: Nothing to report.
3. Possible litigation, one case: Nothing to report.
3. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS, IF ANY (INFORMATIONAL ONLY):
[Out of order]
Mayor Flores asked the Councilmembers if there were any
informational communications to add to the agenda.
*INFORMATIONAL NOTE: Vice Mayor Spiro announced the
Winter 2002 Book Sale, sponsored by the Cotati - Rohnert
Park Unified School District and the Rohnert Park
Public Safety Officers' Association (RPPSOA), on
January 25 -26, 2002, at 6600 Hunter Drive. She noted
anyone interested in volunteering should call the
Department of Public Safety at 584 -2600.
* Councilmember Vidak- Martinez discussed The Movement an
Act to Leave No Child Behind, a national policy vision
that incorporates the best practices and programs to
address the needs of America's children. She
DISTRIBUTED a letter from Marc Morial, Mayor of the Ci,
of New Orleans, requesting an endorsement of the
movement. Council CONCURRED TO AGENDIZE the matter fo
action at the next Council meeting..
*City Council /Community Development Commission /
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(3 )
* Councilmember Mackenzie indicated that he would be
giving a report on the Water Advisory Committee meeting
under Agenda Item 15, "Council Committee and /or Other
Reports."
* Councilmember Vidak- Martinez indicated that she would
be giving a report on the Investors' Tourism Council
meeting.
2. APPROVAL OF CONCURRENT MEETING MINUTES FOR:
REGULAR CONCURRENT CITY MEETINGS - DECEMBER 11, 2001
SPECIAL CEREMONIAL MEETING - DECEMBER 13, 2001
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Vidak- Martinez, seconded by
Councilmember Mackenzie, the Regular Concurrent City
Meetings Minutes of December 11, 2001, and the Special
Ceremonial Meeting Minutes of December 13, 2001, were
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AS AMENDED:
* Councilmember Mackenzie: Special Ceremonial Meeting
Minutes, page 2, last paragraph, replace "Scotland,
the Great" with "Scotland the Brave."
4. YOUTH REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CITY COUNCIL FROM HIGH
SCHOOL YOUTH LEADERSHIP OF ROHNERT PARK SELECTIONS:
1. Recognizing Youth Representatives: Senior Adam Nordin
(Community Service Committee - 24 -Hour Relay Steering
Committee) was recognized.
*Youth Report /Comments, if any: Highlights of the
Youth Report included the following:
(1) December Canned Food Drive a success - over
32,000 cans collected;
(2) The Catamount, RCHS newspaper, ranked 9th in
the nation - DISTRIBUTED TO COUNCIL;
(3) Basketball season in full swing;
(4) 24 -Hour Relay Planning Committee meeting,
January 15, 2002, from 3:30 to 4:30 at the SCAYD
Burton office - call 793 -9030 if interested.
2. Other Youth Comments, if any: None.
5. SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATED STUDENTS, INC.,
REPRESENTATIVE:
1. Recognizing SSU ASI Representative Travis Tabares_:
ASI Representative Tabares was recognized.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MIN7
January 8, 2002 Page(4 )
2. SSU ASI Report /Comments, if any: ASI Representati
Tabares reported on several events /issues, with
highlights including the following:
(1) Sports updates available on the SSU website;
(2) Exended report on JUMP, ASI's community service
programs, including Adopt -a- Grandparent, Cougar,
Club, Events Committee, and SOUP (Serving Our
Unfed People) - over 5,000 total hours of
volunteer time for JUMP this fall.
6. SCHEDULED APPEARANCES /PRESENTATIONS:
*MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS OF PROCLAMATIONS
1. Congratulating and Honoring Eagle Scout Andrew
Fitzpatrick Ryan: Eagle Scout Ryan came forward,`
and Mayor Flores explained the numerous
accomplishments required to achieve the status of
Eagle Scout. The Mayor then read a portion of the
proclamation, and Council congratulated Eagle
Scout Ryan on his achievement.
2. Congratulating and Honoring Eagle Scout Eric
William Smith: Eagle Scout Smith was unable to
attend the meeting this evening, and Mayor Flores'
indicated that he would be honored at a later time,
3. Expressing Appreciation to James Grundman, David
Rowley, and Joe French, of the City's Information
System, for their dedication, expertise, and
relentless hard work to win war against computer
virus and toxins: City Information System staffer%
Grundman, Rowley, and French came forward and
were presented Resolutions of Appreciation for the
dedicated efforts in maintaining the City's
Information System.
7. UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES:
Mayor Flores stated that in compliance with State law,
The Brown Act, members of the public wishing to make a
comment may do so at this time, limited to 3 -5 minutes
appearance, with a 30- minute limit.
*City Council /Community Development Commission /
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(5 )
1. Albert Perron, 4735 Fairway Drive,
noted that he had been before the
November 27, 2001, to request City
a broken wastewater line in front
DISTRIBUTED a photo of said water
that the problem has gotten worse.
that the City fix the water line.
was recognized and
Council on
action in repairing
of his house. He
line and indicated
He again requested
2. David Carey, 4725 Fairway Drive, was recognized and
shared Mr. Perron's concerns over the City's lack of
action taken to repair the broken water line. He
discussed a noise problem stemming from the broken
water line.
Mayor Flores instructed both Mr. Perron and Mr. Carey to
come to the next Council meeting on January 22, 2002, to
discuss the matter. Furthermore, the Mayor DIRECTED City
Manager Netter to work with Public Works Manager Stephens
to resolve the matter immediately.
*************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
8. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Mayor Flores asked if there were any questions about
the matters on the Consent Calendar, which were explained
in the City Manager's Council Meeting Memo. The Mayor
signified removal of one Consent Calendar item for further
discussion as follows: Resolution No. 2002 -07 per
Councilmember Mackenzie's recommendation.
ACKNOWLEDGING THE CITY MANAGER/CLERK'S REPORT ON THE
POSTING OF THE MEETING'S AGENDA
APPROVAL OF BILLS /DEMANDS FOR PAYMENT CONCURRENTLY FOR:
*CITY OF ROHNERT PARK /CITY COUNCIL IN THE AMOUNT OF
$1,927,809.79
*COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION IN THE AMOUNT OF:
$849,243.05
ACCEPTING CASH /INVESTMENTS REPORT FOR MONTH END,
OCTOBER 31, 2001, CONCURRENTLY FOR:
*CITY OF ROHNERT PARK /CITY COUNCIL
*COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
* ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park
January 8, 2002
Resolutions for Adoption:
*CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUI
Page ( 6 )
2002 -01 EXTENDING CONDOLENCES TO THE FAMILY OF WILLIA
"BILL" BALFOUR AND HONORING AND RECOGNIZING H
MANY YEARS OF SERVICE IN THE FINANCE DEPARTME
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
2002 -02 ENDORSING THE ROHNERT PARK BOYS AND GIRLS
SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
APPLICATION
2002 -03 ENDORSING THE COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS
(COTS) SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
GRANT APPLICATION
2002 -04 ENDORSING THE SONOMA COUNTY ADULT AND YOUTH
DEVELOPMENT (SCAYD) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B
GRANT APPLICATION
2002 -05 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SEALED PROPOSALS FOR N
ENERGY - EFFICIENT POOL HEATER AT BENECIA POOL
2002 -06 ACCEPTING COMPLETION AND DIRECTING CITY ENGI'
TO FILE NOTICE OF COMPLETION, MAGNOLIA PARK
POOL, PROJECT NO. 1999 -09
2002 -08 HONORING AND RECOGNIZING KENDRA J. HEATH,
WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS EXAMINER /ADJ
AT THE REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE
ON THE OCCASION OF HER RETIREMENT
2002 -09 REJECTING THE INSUFFICIENT CLAIM OF BILL AND
MARIE SLACK (RE. ALLEGED AUTO DAMAGE)
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Mackenzie, seconded by
Councilmember Vidak- Martinez, with the exception of
Resolution No. 2002 -07, the Consent Calendar as otherwiE
outlined on the meeting's agenda was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVI
Item for Consideration:
2002 -07 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN BENEFITS FOR THE ROHNERT
PARK CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember Mackenzie requested clarification
regarding the date of April 30, 1997, in the resoluti
and staff responded to further Council inquiries.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(7 )
Council discussion concluded and upon MOTION by Vice Mayor
Spiro, seconded by Councilmember Vidak- Martinez,
Resolution 2002 -07 was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED with the
following amendments:'
(1) Section A, second paragraph, per City Attorney
Strauss, amend to read: "The City shall pay any
deductible or co- payments required by Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan, Inc., California North
Region (S Coverage), Health Plan of the Redwoods
(Empire Plan), Blue Cross Prudent Buyer Plan for
those members of the City Council in office on the
date this resolution is adopted and who were
elected before April 30, 1997;
(2) Section H, second paragraph, delete "Resolution
87 -117" and amend it to read "Resolution 89 -117.
*************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
9. PLANNING AND ZONING MATTERS:
File No. 2001- 074 -1: Consideration of an Ordinance
adding Chapter 17.70, Housing Trust Fund and
Inclusionary /In -Lieu Fee Requirements, to the Rohnert
Park Municipal Code, including consideration of the
adequacy of a Negative Declaration for same.
1. Staff Report: Planning and Community Development
Director Kaufman shared the contents of the staff
report and responded to Council questions.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: Mayor Flores OPENED the Public
Hearing at 7:40 p.m.
1. Kevin Pohlson, 5960 Inglewood Drive, Pleasonton, was
recognized and noted that he represents Brookfield
Homes regarding the University District Specific Plan.
He DISTRIBUTED AND REVIEWED A LETTER, ATTACHED TO THE
ORIGINAL SET OF MINUTES, outlining Brookfield Homes'
comments on the proposed ordinance and how it might
apply to the University District LLC portion of the
University District Specific Plan satisfying the 15%
requirement of the 1,405 housing units. Furthermore,
he reviewed comments in the letter regarding the
Inclusionary /In -Lieu Fee Ordinance, and he provided
ABAG Blueprint 2001 and HCD documentation to supplement
the recommendations.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(8 )
Mayor Flores CLOSED the Public Hearing at 7:55 p.m.
3. Council Discussion /Action: Staff responded to
further Council inquiries.
Resolution for Adoption:
2002 -10 CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN
ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 17.70, HOUSING TRUST
FUND AND INCLUSIONARY /IN -LIEU FEE REQUIREMENTS,
TO THE ROHNERT PARK MUNICIPAL CODE
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Reilly, seconded by
Vice Mayor Spiro, Resolution 2002 -10 was UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVED.
Ordinance for Introduction:
No. 677 ADDING CITY OF ROHNERT PARK MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 17.70, HOUSING TRUST FUND AND
INCLUSIONARY /IN -LIEU FEE REQUIREMENTS
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Reilly, seconded by
Vice Mayor Spiro, Ordinance for Introduction No. 677 was
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED with the following conditions:
(1) Section C, "Alternative Equivalent Action,"
language outlining the transfer of units from
one developer to another, including a transfer fee,
would be added as an example of alternative
equivalent action;
(2) Section D, "In -Lieu Housing Fee," consideration of
adding language limiting the number of units for
payment of the fees on the size of the projects;
(3) Further consideration of staff comments and HCD
response to staff inquiries.
10. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2002:
Mayor Flores referred Councilmembers to the "Year 2002
Liaison Assignments" document in the agenda packets.
2002 Liaison Assignments are as follows:
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park
January 8, 2002
Regular Inside Agencies
Bicycle Advisory
COYF
Cultural Arts
Housing Finance Authority
Rent Appeals Board
Parks & Recreation
Planning
Senior Citizens
Sister Cities
*CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
Page ( 9 )
Regular Outside Agencies
ABAG
Chamber of Commerce
Library Advisory
Mayors' & Councilmembers' Working Group
Regional Wastewater
School District /Cities
Sonoma County Tourism - Investors
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
Sonoma County Water Agency
Regular Inside Subcommittees
Assn. of Retired Employees (ARECORP)
Cable Television
Golf Courses
Hospital Site
Mobile Home Parks
Performing Arts Center
Rohnert Park Stadium
Temporary Committees
Canon Manor
Channel 22
City Hall Planning
City Land Use /Stadium Vicinity
Commissions' Policy Review
Economic Development
Executive Committee
Founders' Day
General Plan Implementation Oversight
Garbage
Library Planning
Rohnert Park Youth Summit
Technology
Telecommunications
Liaison Alternate
JM
JR
VVM
JM
AF
LS
LS
VVM
LS
VVM
JR
AF
AF
JM
AF
VVM
LS
JR
Liaison Alternate
LS
JM
VVM
AF
JR
AF
AF
LS
AF
VVM
VVM
AF
VVM
LS
JM
LS
AF
JM
Councilmembers
AF
&
VVM
AF
&
JM
LS
&
AF
LS
&
JR
VVM
& LS
& LS
LS
&
AF
AF
&
JR
Councilmembers
JM
& VVM
AF
& JR
JM
& AF
JR
& VVM
VVM
& JM
LS
& VVM
AF
& LS
LS
& AF
JM_&
VVM
VVM
& JM
AF
& JR
LS
JM
LS
& AF
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park
January 8, 2002
MEM
*CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
Page(10)
Councilmember Mackenzie clarified that the Sonoma County
Water Agency refers to the Water Advisory Committee which
meets on the first Monday of each month. At the request
of Vice Mayor Spiro, Mayor Flores clarified the difference
between the Cable Television Subcommittee, which will
handle AT &T compliance and upgrade issues, and the
Telecommunications Subcommittee. The Mayor noted that
the Cable Television Subcommittee will schedule a
meeting with Management Analyst Fogle to address relevant
matters.
Furthermore, Council CONCURRED TO AGENDIZE the matter of
the General Plan Implementation Oversight Subcommittee
for a full Council discussion at the next Council meeting.
11. COMMISSION /COMMITTEE /BOARD APPOINTMENTS - COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS FOR VACANCIES AND /OR
TERMS EXPIRED DECEMBER 31, 2001:
1. Bicycle Advisory Committee:
In order to fill the vacancy due to Christopher Costello's
resignation, Mayor Flores DIRECTED STAFF to advertise the
position and instructed any interested members of the
public to contact City Hall.
2. Housing Financing Authority
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Vidak- Martinez, seconded by
Vice Mayor Spiro, Council UNANIMOUSLY AFFIRMED the resident
el-eeten-s re- appointment at large of James F. McGinnis and
ratified the December 11, 2001 resident re- election for the
re- appointment of Patrick Reymond, as members of the
Housing Financing Authority, who will respectively serve
two -year terms to expire December 31, 2003.
*CLERICAL PROCEDURAL CORRECTION ABOVE for 1/8/02 City Council meeting by Deputy City Clerk J. Hauff for
clarification of "at large" City Council re- appointment s City Council ratification of the resident election
(deletion lined out /addition underlined)
3.. Mobile Home Parks Rent Appeals Board:
Upon MOTION by Vice Mayor Spiro, Council UNANIMOUSLY
AFFIRMED the re- appointment of Michael Caalim as
Mayor Spiro's nomination for a two -year term to
expire December 31, 2003.
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Reilly, Council UNANIMOUSLY
AFFIRMED the re- appointment of Katherine Collins as
Councilmember Reilly's nomination for a two -year term to
expire December 31, 2003.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(11)
Councilmember Vidak- Martinez REQUESTED TO AGENDIZE filling
the vacancy due to Michael Muchmore's lack of interest in
re- appointment until the next Council meeting to allow her
time to review applications for the position.
4. Sister Cities Relations Committee:
Upon MOTION by Vice Mayor Spiro, seconded by
Councilmember Mackenzie, Council UNANIMOUSLY AFFIRMED the
re- appointments *at large of Gordon Adam, Carol Grubler,
Susan Harrow, and Keiko M. Monraz, who will respectively
serve two -year terms to expire December 31, 2003.
*CLERICAL PROCEDURAL. CORRECTION ABOVE for 1/8/02 City Council meeting by Deputy City Clerk J.Hauff for
clarification of "at large" City Council re- appointments (addition underlined)
12. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - CONSIDERATION OF 2001 -02
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION:
1. Staff Report: Recreation Director Barry gave a
brief overview of the staff report provided to
Council in the agenda packets.
2. Council Discussion /Action: Councilmember Reilly
clarified that he gave a rating of "A" to the
Rohnert Park Community Library and a rating of "B"
to the Benecia Park Youth Center Remodel. City
Manager Netter indicated that he will be meeting
with Director Public Safety Bullard to discuss the
needs of the department, and he will bring that
information to the upcoming six -month budget review
meeting for the Council. Council then CONCURRED
with the results of the Council rankings of the
2001 -02 Capital Improvement Projects.
RECESS: Mayor Flores declared a recess at
approximately 8:20 p.m.
RECONVENE: Mayor Flores reconvened the Council at
approximately 8:28 p.m. with all of the
Councilmembers present.
13. GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM - MATTERS RELATED
TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROCESS, IF ANY:
1. Process for considering projects that vary
significantly from current programs and policies -
Consideration of General Plan Subcommittee to
provide feedback to applicant for their proposal
prior to processing the project proposal through the
Planning Commission and City Council:
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(12)
*Council Discussion /Action: Councilmembers shared
their perspectives on the matter, and Mayor Flores
indicated that the issue will come back before the
City Council at the next Council meeting for full
discussion as an action item.
2. Other, if any: None.
14. BACK -UP ALARM ORDINANCE REVIEW - RESPONDING TO AL BARR
PROPOSAL:
1. City Attorney Report: City Attorney Strauss
summarized the contents of her staff report,
noting that she would report back to Mr. Barr when
she gets a response from Michael Mason, Chief
Counsel for CAL -OSHA, regarding the validity of
the proposed ordinance.
2. Council Discussion /Direction: At this time, Mayor
Flores called forward a member of the public
interested in speaking on this issue.
1. Al Barr, 5746 Dexter Circle, was recognized and
thanked the Council and staff for following through on
his proposed back -up alarm ordinance. He REQUESTED
a copy of City Attorney Strauss' January 8, 2002,
memorandum, which was then SUBMITTED to him.
15. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND /OR OTHER REPORTS, IF ANY:
1. Water Advisory Committee: Councilmember Mackenzie
reported on the January 7 meeting of the Committee,
including a discussion of the need for cities to
discuss a draft vision statement and to consider a
number of possible issues in drafting a new
agreement with SCWA over the next two years. He
also noted that the Committee is awaiting a
biological assessment from the National Marine
Fisheries Service in terms of threatened species
in the Russian River watershed. At the suggestion
of Councilmember Mackenzie, Mayor Flores DIRECTED
STAFF to set up a workshop for the February 12
Council meeting to discuss a draft vision statement
and to review the relevant issues regarding the
new agreement with SCWA.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(13)
2. Investors' Committee for Sonoma County Tourism
Council: Councilmember Vidak- Martinez showed how
Rohnert Park is well featured in this year's
Visitors' Guide. She then DISTRIBUTED an article
from today's Press Democrat, entitled, "Lodging
surcharge may build ad fund," and she discussed the
implications for Rohnert Park. Council CONCURRED
TO AGENDIZE the matter of a lodging surcharge for
a full discussion at the next Council meeting.
16. COMMUNICATIONS:
Communications per the attached outline were brought to
the attention of the Councilmembers.
* Councilmember Reilly, per letter from A. Estrada,
resident, requesting recognition for local young people
serving in the military: Council CONCURRED with
Councilmember Reilly's suggestion to DIRECT STAFF to
draft a resolution and /or proclamation honoring local
young residents and other members of the community
currently serving in the military.
*Vice Mayor Spiro, per a phone call she received today
regarding the unprofessional and vulgar manner in which
a resident was treated by a local towing company: City
Manager Netter REQUESTED that Vice Mayor Spiro direct
the citizen to put the specifics of the complaint in
writing so that staff may pursue appropriate action.
*Mayor Flores, per information from Councilmember
Vidak- Martinez, regarding the illness of Marie
Vinsick, a member of the Mobile Home Parks Rent Appeals
Board: At the suggestion of Mayor Flores, Council
CONCURRED to DIRECT STAFF to send flowers to Ms. Vinsick
at Kaiser Hospital and to convey Council's best wishes
for her recovery.
17. MATTERS FROM /FOR COUNCIL:
1. Garage conversions /parking issues: Vice Mayor
Spiro raised concerns about garage conversions,
and City Attorney Strauss indicated that the
matter will come before the Planning Commission
this month and in due course before the City
Council in the upcoming weeks.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEE
January 8, 2002 Page(14)
City Manager Netter DISTRIBUTED the Planning
Commission's January 10, 2002, staff report
concerning proposed amendments to the Rohnert Park
Municipal Code regarding exceptions to the
off - street parking requirements in the City's
residential zoning districts. Vice Mayor Spiro
raised concerns about vehicles with signage parking
on City streets.
Upon MOTION by Vice Mayor Spiro, seconded by Councilmember
Reilly, a motion to place the matter of a review of the
parking ordinance under "Matters from /for Council" was
APPROVED 4 -1 with Councilmember Vidak- Martinez dissenting,
2. Mavors' & Councilmembers!Association, Cit
Selection Committee yearly meeting, Thursday,
January 10, 2002, 6:30 p.m., Doubletree Hotel,
Rohnert Park: INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY - All
Councilmembers invited to attend.
3. Joint Meetings Schedule for SSU President's Cabine
City of Cotati; and Cotati - Rohnert Park Unified
School District: Mayor Flores indicated that he
will be meeting with City Manager Netter to review
possible dates for meetings with SSU's President's
Cabinet, the City of Cotati, and the Cotati-
Rohnert Park Unified School District.
4. Other informational items, if any: None.
18. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
1. Appointment of Tom Bullard - Director of Public
Safety: City Manager Netter referred Council to
the e -mail and the press release regarding the
appointment of Mr. Bullard. The City Manager
noted that a small celebration is planned for
mid - February to honor Director Public Safety
Bullard for his years of service and his
achievement.
2. Other informational items, if any:
a. Monthly Project Update Reports: City Manager
Netter stated that he will be presenting the
Council with a monthly report on project update
at the first Council meeting of each month in a
effort to assist the Council in tracking each
project.
*City Council /Community Development Commission /
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(15)
19. OTHER UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES:
At this time, Mayor Flores called forward any members
of the public wishing to speak. No one responded.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, Mayor Flores
ADJOURNED the meeting at approximately 8:56 p.m.
Katy Leonard,
Certified Shorthand Reporter
CSR No. 11599
Armando Flores,
Mayor
City of Rohnert Park
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
January 8, 2002
Ms. Nancy Kaufman
Planning and Community Development Director
City of Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Boulevard
11J5 - i q3-62_
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
KLILL0
M E S
RE: Municipal Code Chapter 17.70 Housing Trust Fund and Inclusionary / In-
Lieu Fee Requirements Ordinance
Dear Ms. Kaufman:
Brookfield Homes appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the City of
Rohnert Park Inclusionary Housing and In -Lieu Fee Ordinance. Our comments to
the proposed ordinance are based upon the University District LLC portion of the
University District Specific Plan satisfying the 15% requirement of 1,405 housing
units through one or more of the following methods:
A. Dedicate land to a non - profit development and management company who
shall provide up to 130 high density rental units in one or two
communities within the University District Specific Plan.
B. Construct second dwelling units at the same time as the primary single
family detached home to satisfy the need for students and smaller
households. These "affordable -by- design' deed restricted units would
meet the City's size and parking standards and achieve or exceed the
City's affordable unit requirement. These units, which are promoted by
the State of California Subdivision Map Act, by HCD and by ABAG as
methods to provide affordable housing, shall be provided at a two -to -one
ratio to insure that the City required affordable unit count is met or
exceeded while allowing the primary homeowner the ability to utilize
these units as housing for family members through their life cycle. The
=LO HOMES opportunity to rent these second dwelling units provides affordable
n INC. housing opportunities while allowing the primary homeowner to achieve
income to supplement mortgage payments.
C. Construct and sell for -sale units to satisfy a portion or all of the for -sale
affordable housing requirements.
ewood Drive
D. Fund In -Lieu Affordable Housing Fees for a portion of the University
n. CA 94588 District LLC property so as to facilitate the development of an offsite or
1.5.463. 2600 onsite non - profit rental community or other project that satisfy the City's
227.8740 affordable goals.
E. Construct off -site infrastructure that supplies future affordable housing
opportunities for the eastside development areas of the City so as to satisfy
the affordable housing requirements of the University District.
These methods to satisfy the affordable housing requirements shall be provided
within the Specific Plan in phases tied to a Development Agreement that relies on
the City's Growth Management Plan. These methods for satisfying the City's
affordable housing requirements would be within the purview of Section
17.70.040 C2 Alternative Equivalent Action of this Ordinance.
Our comments to the Inclusionary/ In -Lieu Fee Ordinance are as follows:
Section 17.70.040 G.I.b
If a Specific Plan includes an affordable housing program, this program shall
be developed pursuant to a Specific Plan financing and phasing plan. As
market rate units typically subsidize the affordable units, the affordable units
cannot proceed ahead of the market rate units without jeopardizing the
financial viability of a project.
2. Section 17.70.040 G I.c
The City's standard development fees for the affordable housing units should
be waived or reduced to facilitate the development of affordable housing
pursuant to recommendations by ABAG and HCD. See attached Exhibit A -1
for ABAG fee waiver recommendations and Exhibits A -2 through A -5 for
HCD fee waiver recommendations.
Section 17.70.040 H and I
A development that provides market rate for -sale homes is allowed by State
law to satisfy its affordability requirements through rental housing.
Accordingly, a Specific Plan or other development should be allowed to
satisfy its affordable requirements with second dwelling units as moderate
income rental units while providing low and very -low affordable units in a
stand alone rental community. Moderate income second dwelling units should
be considered as mechanisms to satisfy affordable goals of the City,
considering the critical housing needs of Sonoma State University students.
Students are expected to comprise a large percentage of the rental population
of the University District Specific Plan and these students may not qualify for
low or very -low affordable requirements as they are often dependents of
parents, yet they still need affordable moderate rate housing. The use of
moderate income affordable criteria will open up these second dwelling units
to a much wider number of students and small households, thereby relieving
housing shortages elsewhere and achieving City affordability goals. Attached
are Exhibits B -1 through B -7 that describe the value of second dwelling units
pursuant to ABAG and HCD.
4. Section 17.70.040 K
1. The use of moderate income rental second dwelling units in a single
family detached for -sale home program can be achieved through
recorded deed restrictions on the rental rates. This system, which is
regulated easier than other for -sale affordable programs, provides long
term affordability while reducing the management and oversight
responsibilities of the City. The deed restriction ties the affordable
program to the land and the City's oversight is reduced.
5. Section 17.70.040 J
1. This Section needs to be rewritten to insure that affordable units reflect
the exterior architectural materials and design of the adjacent community
and not the size bedroom count. The size and interior specifications
should not match the market rate units, especially on larger homes as
this reduces affordability rather than increases affordability. If an
affordable home is to match a larger home, it pushes the affordable
income levels to rates that are higher than the majority of the City's
affordable needs. The goal of the affordable programs of ABAG and
HCD is to provide housing opportunities at affordable rates, which is
typically satisfied by smaller units.
6. The ABAG Blueprint 2001 document encourages the use of local taxes and
revenues, tax options, municipal bonds, State, Federal Resources to promote
affordable housing (See attached Exhibits C -1, C -2, C -3 and C -4). We also
know of City programs such as "silent seconds" that also enable for -sale
housing to become available to affordable incomes.
7. We encourage the City to utilize the ABAG Blueprint 2001 and the June
2001 HCD Housing Element Questions and Answer statements regarding the
value of second dwelling units to achieve affordable housing opportunities,
especially since ABAG has had such an important role in determining the
number of affordable housing units that the City must provide in order to
satisfy its HCD requirements. Exhibits D -1, D -2, D -3 and D -4 emphasize
ABAG's commitment to second dwelling units. Since HCD relies on ABAG
for its housing projections, could it not also rely on ABAG and its own
published recommendations for housing types to satisfy affordable housing.
See attached Exhibits D -5 through D -8 for HCD recommendations.
The value of larger affordable rental housing projects over individual units is
conveyed as follows:
A. Subsidies are better available from the Federal Tax Credit program on
projects over 50 units.
B. The ability to efficiently manage and maintain an affordable project
increases substantially when the project is plus 50 units. This also better
facilitates long term affordability and energy conservation.
C. Smart growth ideas convey the value of larger, higher density projects
being more conservation and a more efficient use of land.
D. Inclusionary opportunities exist on larger properties better than on
smaller properties, thereby making in -lieu fees and transfer credits (one
property owner buying affordable credits from another property owner)
better mechanisms to insure the availability of long term affordable units.
E. If the ultimate goal is to provide more long term affordable housing
opportunities, then larger affordable projects should be created, located
within a community or quadrant of the City nearby the subject project.
The attempt to locate affordable housing on every residential street
undermines the efficient management of affordable housing and financing
availability for affordable housing. If the goal is to locate affordable
housing within neighborhoods, then utilize second dwelling units, which
provide integrated architectural housing that is "affordable -by- design ",
easier to regulate and satisfies housing needs.
9. Lastly, if the City enacts an In -Lieu Fee for affordable housing, we suggest a
"sliding scale" be utilized to appropriately reflect the proposed home sizes of
a community.
Thank you for this opportunity to provide our thoughts on the inclusionary/ in -lieu fee
ordinance and we look forward to the January 2002 City Council hearing regarding this
issue and the development of the University District Specific Plan.
Sincerely,
Kevin Pohlson
V.P. Land Planning
KP:mI
Cc: John Ryan, Brookfield Homes
Craig Harrington, Quaker Hill Development
Cecily Talbert, McCutchen
Walt Keiser, EPS
N 4 _ FINANCIAL RESOURCES Blueprint 2001
s and Fee Waivers
California cities levy developmenc and impact Fees and e\accluns on new commercial and /or residential
)pment co generate Funding for infrastructure development and public improvements. Fees are also
imeS charged co generate Funds For affordable housing development. For example, in some jurisdictions
nclusionary zoning, developers are given the option co pad' tees in lieu of providing a required number of
market -race units. Another approach is co charge an "affordable housing" Fee on all commercial and
trial developments (usuallc based on square footage), given chat these developments will generate local
rid For additional affordable units.
loprnenc impact fees vary areacly, but can account For as much as 20 percent of a new home's cost in some
fictions. To Facilitate the provision oFaffordable housing, some jurisdictions provide "fee waivers" chic
.e or eliminate ocal deve o rent tees (often with the exception of school impact fees), rovidina a torm of
subsidy in return for Ion, term affordabilicv restrictions on the affected units. There is a Scace- mandared
)l fee waiver For senior housing developments, as chore is no "nexus ber.veen the development oFseni�r
ing and impacts on local schools.
Scace legislation (AB 1600) requires jurisdictions co sho«, the reiationship ber,veen Fees and their impact on
oSed developmenc, the imposition of a Fee should be done as part of a comprehensive housing program. A
nuniry should have a clear idea oFaffordable housing need. the amount of funding needed, how the tends
Fees are co be used, and how they supplement ocher programs.
eflts
Allows a community co generate and direct Funds For affordable housing From local programs and proje�:ts"
Allows developers of market -race unics to contribute co the developmenc or affordable units at another
Provides an incentive for affordable housing by providing fee waivers and reducing overall conscruccion costs
on projects with long -term affordabilin, agreements.
g the Housing Element Process...
Review Current Fee Programs. Review all fees being levied co determine how much Fee programs contribute
and how the resources collected are being used. Also determine the conditions under which Fees can be
waived. This should be done as part of the overall housing strategy.
Involve the Development Community. Involve housing developers co determine the amount; applicabilicv,
and impact of a fee waiver program chat would speciFically support affordable housing developmenc. Earle
contact with developers also eases the acceptance of new fees.
tential Programs and Actions
Develop Clear and Reasonable Guidelines and Waiver Programs. Fees must be reasonable and there muse
be a demonstrated relationship benveen the impacts of new conscruccion or job creation and the need for
affordable housing. Waiver programs must also be carefully designed so chat chev are directed ac prod.:cir,_
housing unics chat are affordable or aimed at special needs groups.
�dopt a Fee Waiver Policy. An adoCted pollcv chic clear[%- scaccs prate .:-es for wat%ing F •iii
developers ro seek concessions and promote cne developm:.r,c or affur:. - -, housim-'.
Establish a Plan for the E_xpendicure of Funds. A cicar rle:cble •. ::ocn lit.:r t r:,
the useEuiness of ices and will make i•ees more dc�enslolc . is r -..:il it( - : >ir'� ,r.• - . -.
ntacts and Resources
Ah�DCi!CILA' D PY �;'Il7 i1C i!!!iillJG'i; �li!C( .iC!C�i'r'i �c ^• !i l.':7: ' —..
J
Aot lit My Bat.[ .ntlid: RenlovG;lf B [i'i'i 1 ") ;0 . �)�oi "!l lU!i J.L
Co Affordable Housing. HUD, %Vashington, DC. 1` 91
A C 4 -4
Association of Bay Area Governments /446
e
f
V1
State Department of "'C(
Deve[opment
� Promote multifamily rental housing above ground floor
commercial uses (mixed residential- nonresidential land use).
Permit apartment uses in office /commercial areas where
office space revenue can offset rental costs and act as an
internal project subsidy.
,i: Compile and maintain an inventory of public surplus lands
and land owned by other entities, such as school districts,
public utilities, etc., to identify sites suitable for development
of low- and moderate - income housing. Facilitate the
acquisition of surplus public lands and other identified land for
fordattetousirr9 -deve op t.
Zone for housing types typically occupied by renter,
L` households (e.g. second units, apartment artment complexes, an
mixed
use project-.__--
L, Offer development incentives (e.g. land writedowns, fee
waivers, and below market rate financing) negotiated through
developer agreements to increase multifamily densities in
selected areas.
Reduce multifamily development standards (e.g. number of
required covered parking spaces, setback and building height
requirements, etc.)
Q-7 3c) g 1) t
At
« Appropriate zoning and development standards facilitate the
What are appropriate location, siting, capacity, and price of residential development to
zoning and deve%pment meet identified housing needs, particularly new construction for
standards "� lower income households. These include establishing maximum
densities, minimum floor areas, maximum lot coverage, allowing
minimum building, rear and side yard setbacks, reduced parking
and amenities requirements, and other controls such as
streamlined architectural and design review standards.
State zoning law (Government Code Section 65913:1) requires
localities to zone sufficient vacant land for residential use with
in
appropriate standards to meet the housing needs side ed at
the general plan. Appropriate standards are requirements
"contribute significantly to the economic feasibility of producing
housing at the lowest possible cost.
In regulating subdivisions, Government Code Section 65913.2
provides that a local government may not impose design criteria
for the purpose of rendering an affordable housing development
infeasible. A community may not impose standards and criteria
for public improvements (e.g. streets, sewers, schools, or parks)
i�
ii
um Zoo,
30 j
ECement Questions QZAnswers
iy —.Z_J
State q)epartment of wring and Com nity (DeveCopment
opportunities. Localities can create first time homebuye
sharing, or self -help housing programs to provide of
homeownership opportunities. Local governments can also assist
developers in making applications for other public or private
housing funds or low- income housing tax credits.
Working with local nonprofit housing developers, advocacy
groups and tenants may make assisting in the development of
affordable housing easier and more effective. Many jur;sdictions
support existing nonprofit housing developers or help establish
new joint ventures and local housing sponsors. Local
governments can establish a local housing authority or work with
an established nonprofit development corporation or Community
Based Housing Development Organization (CHDO) to develop
operate, and manage low- and moderate - income housinc
projects. Contacts for housing advocacy and technical assstancE
organizations are available through HCD with links on oui
website.
Local governments can indirectly facilitate the development o
more affordable housing through effective administration cf Ian(
use controls and by providing appropriate regulatory concession:
and incentives.
The following are examples of programs that have beep
successfully implemented by localities to comply with State la\
and address their housing needs:
Adopt a density bonus ordinance in compliance wit
Government Code Section 65915 and develop an outreac
program to ensure its successful implementation.
Expand on the minimum requirements of state density 'oonu
law by offering additional density bonuses (more than 2
percent) and /or bonuses for housing meeting the speci:
needs of the community (e.g., housing for large families).
Use landbanking to make surplus lands available as sites f,
affordable housing.
Provide fast track or one -stop permit processing for log
income housing probe
(� 4 Reduce, waive or subsidize development and impact fees
affordable housing projects.
Reduce o e ; eve ent stan Lo promo
affordable housing development. For example, redw
parking standards or covered parking requirements for seni
or certain projects designed for lower income house ^olds.
`,3, Allow the purchase of air rights to increase building heig'r
and /or intensify residential uses.
A - C -0 At) ,
36 June
ECement Questions (SZAnswen
LS. Z3 u Ltt. -- + u u _ u L-Z
State Department of � and t
L
L i Use State Housing Law (SHL) codes without additional lo(
requirements. State law prohibits modification of SI
standards, except where local variations are necessary
reasons of climate, geology, or topography (Health a
Safety Code Section 17958.5).
On /Off Site Improvement Requirements
LL;, Reduce street widths (e.g., 36 feet or less) and right of wa
(e.g., 56 feet or less)
L
Li Reduce the number and size of sidewalks (e.g., on one side
of street only)
y Use roll curbs instead of formed curbs and gutters
,y Increase spacing between manholes
,� Allow multiple service laterals
L
L� Allow common trenching for utilities
�, Allow fire hydrant intervals of 500 feet or more
a Where appropriate; reduce the size of water and sewer mair
Design residential streets to accommodate average traffic
estimates
Use utility or sidewalk easements instead. of right -of -ways
L, Place water supply systems and sanitary sewers
easements instead of right -of -ways
Fees and Exactions
jL� Reduce or waive fees, exactions, and /or developme
standards for particular types of development (e.g., rental
assisted housing, second units, mixed -use and in ill project
housing affordable to low- and moderate - income householdE
Lid Allow payment of fees upon certificate or occupancy, rathE
than prior to building permit issuance to reduce developE
construction financing costs and overall development costs
Processing and Permit Procedures
L Expedite permit processing (allow one -stop, consolidates
and concurrent permit processing)
& Hold pre - application development conferences
L Prepare and present explanatory materials on the applicatio
and review processes to streamline permit processing
Utilize development agreements as authorized b
Government Code Section 65864
Eliminate conditional use permit requirements for multifamil
projects when land is zoned multifamily
38 A/ • C • • June 20
State (Department of aredCo sty (Development
LQ4 Provide tenant relocation assistance and/or direct rental
subsidies. In the event of owner mortgage prepayment or
project based Section 8 opt -out, the Section 8 enhanced
voucher may not be sufficient to assure affordability or the
new owner may refuse to accept Section 8 vouchers. In such
cases, local relocation assistance and additional rental
subsidies may be necessary. Work with the local Public
Housing Authority to determine the availability of tenant -
based Section 8 vouchers for tenants who choose to move
from at risk units or who are displaced by conversion. Some
jurisdictions have used redevelopment housing funds for
replacement of Section 8 rental subsidies.
C4 Provide ongoing reservation technical assistance and
education to affected tenants and the community at- lance. on
the need to preserve the existing affordable housing smcK.
V i J At
What other kinds of local L Prohibit condominium conversions or establish a purchase
Program actions help program to assist interested income eligible tenants in
,0reVe/7t the 1055 of at- purchasing their units.
t,4 Require owners to replace low- income units conversed to
risk government market rate on a one -to -one basis.
a55i5tedprofect5? �, Provide local direct rental subsidies to affected tenants who
wish to remain in converted units or where Section 8
vouchers and certificates are not available.
Link local housing sponsors with converting projects requiring
new ownership, financing and /or subsidies, and
management.
Provide prospective new owners with predevelopment,
acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or gap grants and loans in
exchange for long -term use and rent restrictions.
Provide rehabilitation grants /loans with extended use
restrictions for older units (e.g. locally funded with mortgage
revenue bond proceeds, CDBG, or HOME).
Act as an "intermediary" to temporarily preserve converted
units until local housing sponsors can secure financing to
repurchase and rehabilitate.
Offer local incentives (lower_ interest rate loans and more
favorable loan terms and conditions) to owners wishing to
refinance and prepay their existing mortgage in exchange for
continued affordability restrictions.
Reduce, waive or subsidize local development fees
associated with preservation or replacement of at risk units.
Incorporate preservation incentives /conversion disincentives
into an adopted Preservation Ordinance.
__ '. /,/ - C 1, 4e:> .
June 2001
41 )
ON 3 - PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES Blueprint 2001
and Units ' •
and unit is an additional self - contained living unit on the same lot as the primary residential unit. It may
.her attached to or detached From the primary unit, but must contain cooking, eating, sleeping, and rull
icion facilities. State law (Gov Code §65352.2) permits second units and establishes minimum standards For
development. Second units are also known as in -law units or accessory, dwellings and are sometimes called
i�. Flats although chat term also applies to a similar but more restrictive type of unic (Gov Code �65352.1).
al government can either adhere co the State standards or adopt its own second unit ordinance. ,An,. local
lance must comply with the provisions in the State law. The c'car intent of the State is co promote the use or
id units (Gov Code 165352.1501. Stace law exempts second units From local growth limits.
osicion co second units generally comes From neighborhood concern over parking and traffic impacts. Local
ac-on can control the location, size, parking requiremencs, and architectural compatibility. In order to
rnize fears (usually unfounded) chat single- family neighborhoods will be overrun by second units. sot^
nunicies limit the number oFsecond units by neighborhood.
eFits
provides affordable housin_z because usually there are no land cost;. Second units Frequendv rent For iess
than comparabiv sized apartments.
Supplements the income of the homeowner, thus allowintr the elderly co remain in their homes or mocecate-
income ami ies to afford houses.
Provides housing For family members throughout their lice cycle. For example, the second unit can be renc;d
when a family is young and just geccing scarred; then used as a home office; then used For their children as
chev become teenagers and voung adults: then as a living unic For elderly parents; ecc.
Permits the elderly to "age in place' and helps them avoid unnecessary and premature relocation to nursing
homes and supportive housing.
the Housing Element Process...
Provide Facts. Respond to community Fears about being ovem-helmed with impacts From second unic b,%-
collecting information from ocher communities about the number of second unit applications they received
when their ordinances were liberalized and the actual impacts that were experienced after unic occuoancl.".
Also, cry to evaluate the actual impacts from existing second units in the community.
Evaluate Existing Ordinances. Review existing ordinances in relation to second unit requirements. At a
minimum, local ordinances should comply with State law requirements. Determine how many second units
have been approved in recent years and if the number is low, determine what the barriers are. Incen-ie%Vs
with recent applicants may highlight existing standards, Fees. or ocher requirements char discourage the
development of new second units.
Educate Officials. Provide information on second units to local officials, includinv data on second
Within the jurisdiction as well as experiences From ocher jurisdictions. Help them understand the
benefits oFencouraging more second units and strategies for addressing Docer,nal impacts.
vial Programs and Actions
Adopc an Effective Ordinance. Adopc a second unic ordina s c r:,�istent :i-h State l:!
existing ordinances and the amount, location and :tcfordabiL :�_;iir _. end units .na.
tmpcovemencs and modi lcacions.
:-adopt Standards. Encourage se:onu units by actoocl
Rl(nimum lvc size, m:uXimum unic size. parking scandar _`s. iC :D.: :< .!. ^. !, ;hc rCQluuiC�MCf`,ti.
Association of Bay Area Governments
,005A (:57. 3 -23
�X/474 /'3 /T
TIoN 3 - PROGRAMS AND-STRATEGIES
Blueprint 2001
A nticipace Concerns. Address compacibilirti issues within exiting neighborhoods by esr,rhlishing ,ichic%ahle
srrndards and guidelines.
Ad Reasonable Parking Requirements. Establish reasonable parking requirements chat take inro
consideration the size of the unit and location. ivlosc second units are unlikely to need more than one off -
screec space, and units located close to transit, e.mplovmenc centers or where on- street parking is plentiful
Rlav nor need any off - street spaces. Also consider innovaciye parking provisions, such as tandem parking or
alloy; ng parking in side -vard setbacks, for their potential applicability.
void Excessive Requirements. Limits on the maximum number of unics within a neighborhood,
requirements For owner occupancy, and high parking requirements may deter legal construction of second
unics and should be used only when absolutely necessary to ameliorate community concerns.
Discourage Conditional Use Permits. IF second unit approvals can be made without a conditional use
Permit or ocher action requiring public hearing, propercv owners will Find it less burdensome co add second
unics.
Provide Assistance. Financial or technical assistance can encourage second unit development and in;t -ro e
their affordability.
Legalize Existing Second Units. Allow for the legalizing and upgrading of existing units so as co conforn; to
health and safecv requirements. This can be encouraged by re-viev ;ing building code requirements co :nsLme
chev are not excessive and by streamlining the conformance process.
Encourage Second Units in New Construction. New housing should be designed with Flexible spaces th.0
can be used For second unics, housing For family teenagers or seniors, or home offices.
ncacis and Resources
Appendix Dtor phone number; rubere releva'ne.
Prornorino Second Unir>, Urban Ecology's "pealize the Vision— series, No. 6, Oakland, 1998.
`ljo...
Housing For Seniors (Pale 3-58)
Association of Bay Area Governments
'0004 04's .04 6. 3-24
}
w
X /--,/i/5/7"
?ION 3 - PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES
Blueprint 2001
-ess Stories
Second Units Reduce Costs of Home Ownership in a Planned Unit Development. COUreslde Village, a
mixed -use development on a 63.5 acre sire in Santa Rosa includes single- family homes around a core of
multi- family apartments, retail, live /work units, a pre - school, community center, and church, with pocket
parks scattered through the development. The developmenr is zoned as a "planned community district" and
is designed to replicate a traditional town or village with its mix of housing types, income groups and an
environment where pedestrians are given equal consideration.
The housing type variery includes second dwelling units as a principal permitted use on some lots without
Cequiring a conditional use permit. The use permit requirements establish ma_xImum allowable heights and
setbacks From the lot line and require that all second units go through design review. Prior to obtaining a
building permit, an agreement of restrictions is recorded against the property deed, speciFving chat the
second unic may nor be sold as a separate dwelling unit and chat it must be restricted in size to 700 square
Feet. iNtorcgages on homes with second units are substantially lower after income potential is calculated in.
Second Unit Legalization through the Home Safe Program. Following a Finding in the mid -1990s by Daly
City Building Inspectors of thousands of illegal second units, the City created its "Home Safe Program,
which allowed owners co legalize units built before Januar 1992 after pa.vmenc of a `;100 application Fee.
Daly City ensured chat second units were brought up co current building code standards by relaxing zoninU
restrictions on parking, size, and density. Over a two -year amnesty period, over 1,000 second units were
effeccively legalized. Since then the program has been suspended, mostly due co neighborhood concerns o%-,-r
the ensuing lack oFscreec parking. Currently, second units ('which are mostly in ground floor garages! are
required to provide two parking spaces per unit.
Association of Bay Area Governments 0,0044 045 JA 6:.. 3 -25
/--,— X /-,/ i 13 / -- AS ■s _ _
N 3 - PROGRAMS ANO STRATEGIES
rking at Home
SMART
GROWTH
rking ac home is linked to the affordability of housing because a home office may reduce the need co rent
ce space elsewhere. [c can also save considerable time and expense associated with commuting and is allows
ple who must be at home co supplement their income through Home -based work. The reduction or
�ination of automobile commutes also has potential environmental benefits and having more people ac home
no, the day can enhance neizhborhood safety, contribute co the sense of community, and support near .
Lit businesses,
me occupation regulations have been an integral part of developrnenc regulations For many years. Recency.
concept of live -work units has become common. These copies a,e often created separately in poiicies ar.,.
finances, buc are really 5vo segments along a broad concin'uum. T hey are likely co merge because n,-%v housing
ncreasingly being designed co accommodate workspace.
efits
Negaces the need co rent or"Nce space elsewhere and the savinzs can be applied co the home purchase o;
rental.
Allows people who have difficulry being away From the house or long periods co have some income chat
chey can use For buving or renting a home.
Increases efficiencies, cherebv producing more income chat can be used co buy or rent a home.
Reduces the expenses associated with commuting. Nlon:%- saved can be applied co mortgage or rental
oaymencs.
Produces more zees on the street in residential areas du,ing normal work hours and, therefore, maY
crime.
Contributes co neighborhood cohesion by allowing people co 4ve and work in the same neighborhood.
Supports rehabilitation of under - utilized commercial and industrial areas through development OF kv,e %%ock
units.
Plays a major role in the incubation of new businesses chic provide community -based jobs.
g the Housing Element Process...
Review General Plan Policies. The general plan should be reviewed to ensure Chat it provides policy
guidance for home occupations and live -work units.
Review Home Occupation Ordinances. Existing home occupation ordinances should be reviewed co -MSUre
they do not present unreasonable obstacles co working at home.
Programs and Actions
Ensure Zoning Allows Live -Work Units. The zoning ordinance should be revised co allow lire -V L)r
be built as part OF new building or as existing buildin, rehabilitation.
Tailor Re�ulacions co Area. Home -work regular ions may., �:ar. :.;t in ;erenc parrs Of CICv Ur,e ur.
l
Some communities use Ohre° categories OF home -work: ome occupati live -work, and
latter cacegor,- emphasizes Che work aspects Or the UnIC Ir'i al.'J'.'•'S acri% :C!ZCS WIC, mOCe [?01st:. M';�! .
�ibra� ion. etc.
ClariR- Sale of .Merchandise. Most
o rd, ! n 11O C gnu e SO )an.:es a L..
sociation of Bay Area Governments
,a..3,#4 a... ,<s
.max , 4, Z, /_; 5 i7- $:.
N 3 - PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES
et and Infrastructure Standards
1•
SMART
GROWTH
1 designed and implemented appropriately, lice - planning innovations can provide a win -win outcome,
housing construction costs while also creating developments chat are more pedestrian Friendly.
munities can modify their subdivision and engineering requirements For topics such as street widths, or use
rrnance -based standards in place of prescriptive planning and engineering standards.
is
ables more affordable housing co be built by reducing development costs and, potentially, allowitn more
units per acre.
Contributes to the livability of a community and reduces energy and material requirements.
g the Housing Element Process...
Establish a Task Force. Some communities have assembled a housing cask Force including non- pro,ic and
for - profit organizations, public agencies, and community representatives to review local regulatory processes,
including street and inFrascruccure scandards. Any cask Force should include representatives From alf
departments whose mission is affected by development standards. In particular, the involvement or public
works, engineering, Fire, and public safety officials is critical in any decision co modify developme. ^,c
standards.
Involve the Community and Provide Accurate, Accessible Information. \�'ide participation helps pinpoint
regulatory reform possibilities and generates a positive community attitude coward the recommenc!=ons.:�
public information program can help explain the benefits of modified standards in relation co livabillityy and
safety. Design charreues and computer simulations are useful cools chat can help residents visualize
alternative development patterns.
Review Codes and Standards. Review the local codes and standards For unnecessary or costly requirements
chat contribute to construction costs, as well as excessive permit Fees.
Emphasize the Relationship Between Standards and Livability. Site and engineering scandards hav,- a direct
impact on the livability of a neighborhood, especially on pedestrian and bicycle friendliness, safety, and
opportunities for social interaction. These considerations should be an integral part of deliberations on site
and engineering standards.
tial Programs and Actions
Reduce Street Width. Limit street width co the minimum required to carry traffic and provide parking.
Consider the use of one -way loop streets as a way to further narrow width.
Design Efficient Street Patterns. Design the street network to reduce the need For driving. A grid or
modified grid pattern is preferable co a cul -de- sac / cot lector /arterial system chat requires residents to cr '.: .l
long distance to reach a shopping area, school, or ocher racilic..- chat is actually located nearby.
Reduce Pavement Thickness. Reduce pavement thickness to ::onform co actual need.
NIodify Cul -de -sacs. Reduce turning radius on cul-de-iacs any' "Voc:< «'(: the rite departm nt a>
actual requirements For modern Fire equipment.
Reduce On- Street Parking. Consider requiring parkin` o; '.'.' or:e ;ide or cln:r icreec i calan' in
consideration the potential implications of reduced on ., -etc :k n, :o e��uirements n>r urr
parking in individual developments). In areas prov'dc adequate .
between the sidewalk and moving traffic through use or n,cscape trip).
Use Natural Stormwater Drainage. Eliminate curbs and ut: -s in parking areas, and divert storm ` ",uer .p
sheet flows and swales.
3 -95
Association of Bay Area Governments
ION 3 - PROGRAMS AND_STRATEGIES
Blueprint 2001
jualks and Malkways
Consider Combined Sidewalks and Curbs. Integrate curbs and sidewalks by constructing sloped curbs
alone screecs with light traffic. Combining sidewalks and curbs along busy screecs, however, can discourage
pedestrian activity due ro the distinct lack oFseparacion beRVeen the walking path and moving vehicles.
Emphasize Pedestrian Circulation. Design the pedestrian circulation system so chat people can walk, rather
than drive, co destinations.
jit,ision Design
Provide Flexibility for Housing Types. Provide lots suicabie For zero loc line units and ocher housing ^.oes
chat consume less land per unit.
Anticipate Second Units. Design lots chat are suitable For the inclusion of second units.
Orient Lots Efficiently. Orient the lots so chat solar energy: and natural ventilation can be used ro rec' e
enerw bills.
Drainage Systems
Use Natural Svscems. Incorporate natural detention and retention systems inro the site plan, perhaps as pare
of the park ant'. recreation lands or habitat protection syscem.
Use Less Expensive Materials. Consider less expensive materials such as polvvinyl chloride and
polybucylene, and /or precast concrete structures.
nary Sewers
Lvtod'Fy Manhole Requirements. Increase manhole spacing and substitute cleanours For manholes.
ilities and Utili :-1 Easements
Change Location of Utility Lines. Place utility lines in easements instead of rights -oF way in order co -duce
length of line.
Promote Common Trenching. Use common Erenching For multiple utilities.
tacts and Resources
Appendix D for phone numbers- and addresses, where relevant.
Arendt, Randall, Growing Greener: Purring Conservation inro Local Plans and Ordinances, Island Press.
Washington, DC, 1999.
Burden, Dan, Street Design Guidelines for Healthy /Neighborhoods, Cencer For Livable Communities,
Sacramento, 1999.
Jarvis, Frederick D., Site Planning ar!d Community Desi; !tor Grear ,Neig /,borhoods, Home Builders Press.
1993.
r / ,r .{ ✓.•. e!.. i Zoq;;!e;!t JtandardI ' PAS
Sanders, �`Gelford, et al, Affordable Si;!g_e- Family Hou�v.;� -- �� � �f D =�'��
385. American planning Association, Chicago, 1984"
Souchworrh. Michael and Eran Ben - Joseph, Screer; 1;1C!
York, 1996.
%� oe 44 — 3 -96
Association of Bay Area Governments /"`i
N 3 - PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES
sign Guidelines and Design Review (/'age 3-8
king Standards (Page 3 -88)
ning Standards and Building Codes (Page 3 -98)
Blueprint 2001
ess Stories
)rivace Street Width Reductions. In the Ciry or Vacaville. the Public %`Forks Deparcmenc preFers rhac screec
vldchs be maintained ac the current 50 feet wide standard co enable emergency and ocher service vehicles co
,love freely. However, city staff has negotiated standards on a case -by -case basis for private screec xtdc's co
)e reduced co 32 co 36 feet in planned unic developments.
ncouraging Street Width Reductions to Make Pedestrian - Friendly Streets. Over the past several �ea-s.
:he Ciry of Pleasanton has realized the benefits of reduced street w idchs along w;ch varied setbacks F`or
tomes in new planned unic developmencs. Ciry staff encourage 3_ Fooc wide streets with parkin, on bosh
;ides. They work closely with engineering and Fire departments co evaluate each development and mici;ar.
c
issues of access in a number oFdifferenc ways, including the pro,.
ro ision or ample numbers of Fire hYdraers.
The resulting reduction in asphalt hardscape has translated co increased landscaping and separated side«alks.
which makes For visually and spatially more accraccive streets. The reduced screec widths also sloe do«
traffic by requiring drivers ro pay more attention co the road, making the streets more pedestrian frienc�.�.
Together with ocher traffic calming devices like traffic circles being implemented through the Cicv's Cdrplcal
Improvement Program in older areas, Pleasancon is actively Irving co return streets co neighbochood
residencs. The Cicv also relaxes setbacks For Furnccional porches co 15 Feec (with the setback for the house ac
20 feet) and grants an additional Five feet for porches when garages are sec back 23 Feet: From the screer. By
encouraging residential design chat brings porches and homes closer ro the street and sets garages furc;.er
back, Pleasancon is encouraging the development of pedescriari,riendly. accracrive neighborhoods.
3 -97
Association of Bay Area Governments 4,4,95,P6 6.
% C01III140
N 4 - FINANCIAL RESOURCES
Blueprint 2001
a� Taxes and Revenues
nmuniry chat is committed to addressing local housing issues can create local resources For housing b�
Sing or raising special cages. Alternatively, it can redirect the revenues of existing taxes or allocate a portion
oerneral Fund co housing assistance. New taxes and the expenditure of local revenues Involve a host of
legal, and political issues chat must be addressed. Because of Proposition 13 restrictions on special taxes,
nactmenc of a new tax requires a two- thirds voce of the public it the proceeds are co be dedicated cc a
�ular purpose, such as affordable housing.
;J ES
i,res a community a powerful cool
r the development of affordable
Busing. Local subsidies can be
)mbined with land use
�ncessions and scare and Federal
Inds co provide very affordable
ousing.
lows a community to pursue
jeccives or programs most suited
its needs since Funds are locally
neraced and noc subject to
icside restrictions on their use.
the Housing Element
Review Tac Options. Review and
evaluate all possible options, caking
into consideration the amount of
Funds chat could be generated, the
ease OFcollection, potential .
difficulties in meeting legal
requirements, political support and
opposition, and possible negative
impacts.
Tax Options
■ Property Taxes to repay general obligation bonds over a 20 to
30 year period can be used to finance new housing. A t:.o thins
vote is required to raise property taxes for general obliga -ion
bonds.
■ Transfer Taxes on the sale of property cannot be levied or
special purposes under Proposition 13, but in certain cases ca"
be used to add to the general fund. As well, new or exis? :'g
transfer tax proceeds can sometirnes be redirected to h using
related uses.
■ Special Taxes such as parcel taxes, hotel taxes, or a var ety of
business taxes are excellent sources of funds, but if use--
specifically for -.ousing, a two-thirds vote is necessary.
■ Gann Limit Surpluses can be a resource for affordable rouslr..:7
and require only a majority vote of the electorate. Under
Proposition Four. if revenues of a community exceed certain
limits, the proceeds must be returned to taxpayers, or t-e
electorate can c.nnose to direct the surplus to other speci�ic,
one-time purposes.
■ Dedication of Revenues, such as the interest from mun,c :pal
accounts, residuals from bond repayments, or the proceeds
from the sale of public property can be used for housing. Some
communities have used such dedicated revenues to support a
housing trust fund, a flexible account that can be a source of
grants or loans for the development of affordable housing.
■ General Fund Allocations can be made to support affordable
housing activities. This can occur on a one-time project or
program - specific basis or as part of annual budgeting.
Be Specific. Have a clear idea of
the amount of local resources to be raised and how they are to be used. Identify and carger the programs or
projects chat will use the funds.
tential Programs and Actions
Establish Clear Guidelines. Establish clear guidelines and link generated rands co a specific purpose. su.:,
Funding an affordable housing crust.
Generate Community Support. Broad community support is c-'cial to imposinQ any new taxes• E uca ==
the community about community housing needs and the cocec -ial benefits of a special ca:( assess :.e
build political support and seek endorsements from influential :ndividuals and groups.
Establish a Coordinated Housing Scratew. To be e;f :' = ne``.Iv genera -ed local revenues razed ;=
coordinated with land use programs and ocher funding
�A6 4 -10
Association of Bay Area Governments
s
c
IUN .4 - FINANCIAL RESOURCES Blueprint 2001
ni jpal Bonds
sand counties have traditionally Funded infrastructure pro�eccs through long -term borrowing in the Form of
cipal bond Financing. A number of municipalities are also using bond Financing to support local affordable ;F a
ing programs.
most common Forms oFbond Financing For affordable housing are \/lorc-,a,e Revenue Bonds (�lRBsl and
��ernpt Revenue Bonds. �1RBs are generally used cc assist first -cime homebuyers in the purchase or either
or existing housing, while tae- exempt revenue bonds are used ro assist developers of multi - family rental
ing units co acquire land, construct a new developmenc, or rehabilitate existing units.
advantage of "cax - exempt revenue bonds" (which fund revenue - generating improvements and are
;written on the basis of earmarked revenues), as opposed cc general obligation bonds (which are backed bv
nunicipality's tax base), is chat then do not require voter approval. General obligation bonds must be
oved by two- thirds of the voters. However, general obligation bonds can be used For any type of
,structure improvements chat serve a public purpose (such as affordable housing), while revenue bonds can
be used to Finance improvements chat will generate revenues in return (e.g., providing low - interest loans
are Chen paid back). San Francisco is one of the Few Bay :� ea cities chat has successfully passed a vocer-
�oved municipal bond cc support affordable housing developmenc, providing significant resources For the
s affordable housing programs.
;ral and state restrictions require chat cax- exempt bonds used cc increase affordable housing opporcunicies
blish affordability guidelines, including price and income guidelines For First -time homebuyers and in ome
lelines For rental tenants. For rental housin„ a minimum of _0 percent of the total units are required co be
rdable cc v,-ry low- income households (less than 50 percent of median income). projects with de: ^:.r
rdabilicy (oFcen 100 percent) have a much better chance oFgecting bond allocations.
al jurisdictions can offer bond Financing when a specific project has been proposed or in response cc requests
Financing From a developer. The sponsoring government z. ^,tin, usually in cooperation with the de�eioeer,
s together a specific proposal For ciry council or board approval. An application is also submitted to c:ne
ifornia Debt Limit Allocation Committee (CDL-\Q ac the Scace Treasurer's Office, which is responsible or
caring private activiry bonds. Bond allocation is highly competitive and a complicated Formula is used co
gn points For each proposal. The California Housing Finance Agency also uses proceeds From the sales of
ids to operate single - Family and multi. - Family below - market interest race loan programs described in more
ail in the section on state Financing.
tents
Assists First-time homebuyers to obtain mortgages ac below - market interest races and helps Finance the
construction and rehabilitation of multi - Family rental housing development.
Allows local government cc raise substantial amounts of funding For affordable housing without affeccnz
their cgs rates or operating agencies.
Allows local government cc become directly involved in the developmenc process. By combining bu
Financing with land donations, Fee waivers, and ocher Financial subsidies. a community can carger
and low - income renters.
.n the Housing Element Process...
Consider Bond Approval Criteria when Designating Sites. Ta:<e into ::Insideracton the Scace's
approval criteria when designating sites For affordable ho sic, e!opmenc. This will improve t.. .......
0r %vinninz approval From CDL_kC.
A Cr-,, 4 -14
Association of Bay Area Governments
N 4 - FINANCIAL RESOURCES
TE RESOURCES
Blueprint 2001
gencies play an important role in providing housing ass!sc.lnce by allocating Federal housing Funds and /or
loans available to affordable housing developments. The three principal agencies involved are the Scace
rer's Office, the California Housing Finance Agencv (CHF.�). and the California Department of Housing
,mmunicy Development (HCD).
ms for housing assistance change frequently and detailed descriptions of programs, application proc.dures
bunts of subsidy available are provided by the concerned agencies. The major sources ofscace housin`
ice include:
1e California Debt Limit allocation Committee (CDL -�C). CDLAC, an agency within the Treasu:.r's
Mice, is responsible for overseeing private bond issuances. See :Municipal Bonds, Pale 4 -14,
Le California Tax Credit allocation Committee (CTCAC). CTCAC, also an agency within the Tr,-asurer's
"lice, is responsible For allocating Federal and state cax credits chat are crucial to the construction an_`
tabilicacion of affordable housing developments. See Tax Cred r for Loan Income Hoaasing, Pave 4 -2i.
lifornia Housing Finance agency. CHFA offers a variety of programs to Fund new construction an,' resale
single - family housing for First -time homebuvers. The 501 c)(3) Preservation ,Nfortgage Program. to:
ample, allows the mortgage to be used as acquisition financing For projects that employ cox- exempt 'ponds
d tax credits. CHFA also provides permanent financing for new apartments and subsidizes certain Fro; is
ough its Housing assistance Trust, a Flexible source of sate funds that can offer deferred loans to
ve cash Flows in projects where at least half of the units are for low-- income households.
1'!Department of California Housing and Community Development. HCD is responsible for admin an`
Federal funds for non- enc!tlement jurisdictions and for various scale programs funded through housing
bonds. In the past decade there have been no new housing bonds. However, with passage of the L\,[ulc:-
Family Housing assistance Program, a substantial source of Funds will be made available For assisting tr:
construction of new rental housing.
Online Resources!
HCD's Clearinghouse for Affordable Housing and Community
Development Finance is an excellent source of information for over 200
housing programs offered by the Federal and State government, private
lenders, and foundation grants. The site is at
http: / /www.hcd.ca.gov /clearinghouse. The database specifies applicants
and counties served by each program. It can be searched by:
• Types of Assistance, including information on
construction /rehabilitation loans, down payment assistance, rental
subsidies or predevelopment /interim finance).
• Activities Funded, including information on acquisition,
preservation of affordable housing, new-for sale housing, purchase
assistance, rehabilitation of apartments. ;roux homes and
transitional housing amongst others.
Association of Bay Area Governments 14, 04S 04 6M. 4 -24
i'
O
,2-- X/"-// -5 /-7- Ii-"
4 - FINANCIAL RE30URCES
ERAS. RESOURCES
Blueprint 2001
housing assistance cakes many Forms. The single largest (and often least recognized) Federal program is
e interest car deduction, estimated at S54 billion in 1996 For the entire nation. The California Housing
)00) reports chat Federal assistance For affordable housing %vas only S 17.2 billion nationwide the same
is assistance was primarily used to maintain and operate the existing supply of affordable housing.
For new construction were considerably lower.
iia localities receive Federal subsidies For affordable housing through a number of programs. These
is may be administered locally or at the county level, or in the case of non - entitlement jurisdictions
rural cities and counties) by the California Department of Housing and Community Developmenc
;rate programs, Federal programs often change in terms of program details, application procedures, and
nc of subsidy dollars available. For detailed descriptions, current subsidy levels, and up -to -dace application
jures, refer co program literature available online From the U.S. Department of Housing and Cuban
opmenc (HUD, http:l /www.hud.,,ou).
OF the largest programs, based on current Funding levels, include:
Community Development Block Grant Program. CommunIcY Development Block Grant Program
(CDBG) is the largest Federal housing - related program For affordable housing. It is a `pass - through' program
chat allo%vs local governments co use Federal Funds to alleviate poverty and blight. Cities with populations of
over 50,000 receive CDBG Funds directly From HUD, while smaller cities usually use county - administered
CDBG funds. HUD makes allocations based on a Formula chat cakes population, poverty, and housing
distress into account. CDBG Funds are used For a varies,.- of housing efforts including activities aimed at
reducing costs For private development (helping Fund site acquisition, improvement, and ocher soft costs':
housing acquisition and rehabilitation through short and long -term loans, grants or loan guarantees; direct
pavmenc of rent or mortgage and housing counseling services; and Fair housing activities. CDBG Funds are
best used in combination with ocher subsidy sources or to provide pre - development Funding co initiate
housing development.
HOME Investment Partnership Act. HOivIE, like CDBG, is a Formula -based block ;rant program.
HOME funds must be spent only on housing and are intended to provide incentives For the acquisition.
construction, and rehabilitation of affordable rental and home ownership. HOME requires local
governments to provide matching funds, though the matching ratio depends on the specific uses to %which
HOME funds are to be put. The federal -co -local marching ratio for tenant assistance is currently Four -co-
one, while the match for rental construction is two -co -one.
Section 8 Assistance. Although this long - standing federal assistance program is not expected to increase in
size or scope, it remains an important program For helping to Fill the gap between household income and
housing costs. See Rental Assistance, Page 3 -79.
Low Income Housing Tax Credits. This program is crucial to the development of affordable housin"z
development. See Tax Credits for Low Income Hoaasi a?, Pa;e 4 -21.
Association of Bay Area Governments 0*040S .4 c4v.=. 4 -25
NoIX C
Blueprint 2001
Convert obsolete older public /institutional /commercial /industrial buildings to residential use chrou`,h
adaptive reuse and /or historic preservation.
over-zone — Create a surplus of land For residential development during the current planning period o' u
least 20 percent more than the locality's share of the region, housing nerd. Overzoning compensates [or
urban land left vacant due to ownership and development constraints (about 10 percent), and creates a real
surplus (10 percent). A sufficient supply of land beyond the time Frame of the element helps prevent land
shortages From bidding up land costs.
Allow small and irregular size lot development.
Phase additional capital improvements - Coincide capital improvements with the demand For ne«
construction.
Access alternative capital improvement Funding mechanisms - Such as Mello -Roos communit%. Facilities
bonds, the Infrastructure Bank, special assessment districts, development agreements, general or special
obligation bonds, and /or the use oFscace and Federal Funds (e.g. cransporcacion Funds) to expand
infrastructure capacity.
Increase height limitations — Allow three stories in multifamily zones ac minimum.
Use innovative siting techniques — Approve Subdivision :",taps chat can accommodate zero -lot -lines any
half -plea developments.
Promote clustering of new housing to help reduce new inFrascruccure and housing development cosy.
Increase Floor area ratios — Allow For larger buildings on smaller lots and /or more units per lot bv redo in,
the FAR (total lot area divided by the total building area).
Establish no net loss policy — Rezone equal amounts of land to replace anv residential land used for oc:,er
than its intended residential use.
8: How can a locality make sufficient sires available to accommodate its share of the RHEA For
income levels, particularly lower- & moderate - income households?
While the land inventory may identify sufficient sites in the aggregate to accommodate the locality's total
nerical share of the regional housing need assessment (RHNA), is may nor identify sufficient sites with
nopriace zoning and infrastructure to accommodate the very low -, low- or moderate - income household
lion of the share of need. In these circumstances, the element must identify sites to address the need For
rer- and moderate- income households.
Localities have developed various land use controls and development incentives to encourage a varier, of
housing types for all income levels, including:
Zone sites For higher density and more intensive residential use.
Encourage and Facilitate second unit development in single - Tamil..- residential arras.
Zone sites for mobilehomes and mobilehome par. use.
Establish a rencal -only zone chat provides For rental
densicv residential use.
Promote multifamily rencal housing a00%'e ground tloo,' :u: n :erc:.:
land usfl. P'rmlc apammCnc uses in oricelconimerc!!ti ar a ac can Ut'Sc_
co-scs aria ac: as an Internal oroiect sub'slu:'.'.
Association of Bay Area Governments
015,04 COO. C -19
/5 / 7- X> 0 2W
IX C
Blueprint 2001
%chat is required to identify adequate sites for emergency shelters and transitional housing?
:ry locality with an identified unmet homeless and /or transitional housing need must identify adequace
ncluding existing facilities chat can be converted co accommodate chat need. The identified sices should be
>le For use as emergency shelter and cransicional housing. appropriate sices have the following
teriscics:
ion: The site should be located within the boundaries of the jurisdiction, close co public services and
,es, including transportation, and easily accessible from areas where homeless persons congregate.
Any zoning classification chat allows the siting of a shelcer or cransicional housing project, and does noc
le the development of the sices, or the conversation or use of an existing structure is appropriate. .fir
g application for emergency shelter or cransicional housing should regulate the use, noc the users.
communities include shelters and cransicional housing as a permitted or conditional use in one or more
The General Plan designation and site zoning should accommodate the development of (or comrersio OL,
lg facilities co) emergence shelters or transitional housing without undue special regularory approval.
lopment standards: Parking requirements, Fire regulations, and design scandards should noc impede the
:nc use of the site as an emergency shelcer or For cransicional housing.
%Vhac is required to identify adequate sites for farm-worker housing?
Fes identified for Farmworker housing should Facilitate the provision of housing For agricultural work,--s
minimizing the development of prime ag e
ricultural land co urban uses. These sires should also hav
ccerisucs relating to location, zoning and development scandards which would be appropriate For their use
)using For Farmworkers. Where a need For Farmworker housing has been identified, the program shout::
ify zones where housing For permanent and where appropriate For migrant Farmworkers is allowed.
lace Farmworker sices have noc been idencihed, jurisdictions must allow Farmworker housin, "biz rivhc".
and counties are encouraged co work cooperatively co identify their respective share oFsices needed For
orker housing and to locate chose sites, co the extent feasible, within or adjacent co existing urbanized
pment of Housing for Low - and Moderate - Income Households
What is local g w-
overnment's role in assisting in the development of adequate housing For to
v,-
117
households?
laving assessed and identified the housing needs of low- and moderate - income households, localities
lov a significant number of diverse strategies co assist in developing adequace housing co meeting chose
s. A combination of public and private resources is necessar." co build affordable housintr.
.licies can oFfer direct support For the development oFaffordablc housing through %arious i;,anc
aanisms including the issuance of municipal and mortgage re.enue bonds and use OF redevelopment
cc assistance can also be provided through the utilization OF::oproori ace rederal and scare hnanc a:_:
idv programs co creaze rental and owriersniD opporlunt, e . LJ 1:.:.:J r ", irSt :me lom_2
ni
sharing, or self help housing programs co provide afford�ie hot e,)v. rship Opporcunicies. L:,
rRmencs can also assist developers in making applications rOr ocher D.:Dt! Ur pril ace hOlhln° C'unGS Or
me housing cax credits.
iation of Bay Area Governments W4 C -23
�Xi���-
OIX C
Blueprint 2001
;ing with local nonprofit housing developers, advocacs• '_"Oups and tenants may make assisting in the
t�pment of affordable housing easier and more eEEcccive. Manv jurisdictions support existing nonprotrc
ing developers or help establish new joint ventures and local housing sponsors. Local governments can
lish a local housing authority or work with an established nonproFic development corporation or
rnunrry Based Housing Development Organization (CHDO) ro develop, operate, and manage low- and
irate- income housing projects. Contacts For Housing advocacy and technical assistance organizations are
able through HCD's websice.
oovernmenes can indirectly Facilitate the deyelopmernc 01 more affordable housing through effecciye
niscracion of land use controls and by providing appropriate regularory concessions and incenciyes.
following are examples of programs chat have been successfully implemented by localities to compt.v % ich
law and address their housing needs:
,adopt a density bonus ordinance in compliance with Go%ernmenc Code Section 65915 and develop an
outreach program to ensure its successful implementation.
Expand on the minimum requirements of state densic�- bonus !aw' by o feting additional densiR bones s
(more than 25 percent) and /or bonuses For housing meeting the special needs of the communi(v ie•g
housing For large Families).
Use landbanking to make surplus lands available as sites or affordable housing.
Provide Fast crack or one -stop permit processing For low-income housing projects.
Reduce, waive or subsidize development and impact fees tot affordable housing projects.
Reduce or waive certain development standards co promote affordable housing development. For exan,olf .
reduce parking standards or covered parking requirements for senior or certain projects designed for to er
income households.
Allow the purchase of air rights co increase building heights and /or incensih residential uses.
7: When must a housing element include programs to address or remove governmental
For each policy, requirement, or procedure identified as a governmental constraint, the element must include
appropriate program action to eliminate or modify the constraint or demonstrate how it will be offset b%
policy or program.
What are examples of programs localities have used to reduce or eliminate barriers to the
tenance, improvement, and development of housing?
The Following are strategies communities have Found aporopriate co C: mOVe i-:.gulacory barriers:
. Use Controls
Mod&v and /or reduce rowch controls to enSllre ac:om:7'.0:d : :oP. r C' "c),c i l llc liiln nCCC:;.
Exempc affordable housing projects 'rrom (zmv. "ch cone'-' "„• urn: ant
Allow• zero -loc line and cluster devl- loomenes.
C -24
Association of Bay Area Governments Oez 045 '4 6:—
i
X14-,Z1 --� 7--
NDIX C
Etelax development standards, For example:
Front yard set backs of 20 Feet or less
,minimum lot sizes of 6,000 square Feet or less
Lot width of 60 Feet or less.
Reduce parking requirements.
Provide flexible standards For second units to encourage their development.
s and Enforcement Procedures
allow use of alternative building design and construction materials and methods.
Blueprint 2001
Issue building permits before subdivision approval so the developer can begin construction upon per;-,,.:c
approval.
Coordinate inspection /enForcemenc activities For existing housing with inFormacion, technical assiscan�:e.
and the availabiliry of rehab ilitaeion program gram /loans.
Allow rehabilitation using materials and methods as oFdace oForiginal construction, unless a health or
safety hazard would result (Health and SaFecv Code Section 17922 (c)).
Use State Housing Law (SHL) codes without additional local requirements. State law prohibits
modilicacion oFSHL standards, except where local variations are necessary For reasons oFchmace, geeio �.
or topography (Health and SaFety Codc Section 17958.5).
toff Site Improvement Requirements
Reduce street widths (e.g., 36 Feec or less) and right oFways (e.g., 56 Feec or less).
Reduce the number and size oFsidewalks (e.g., on one side oFscreec onlv).
Use roll curbs instead of formed curbs and ,uciers.
Increase spacing between manholes.
Allow multiple service laterals.
Allow common Trenching For utilities.
Allow Fire hydrant intervals of 500 feet or more.
Where appropriate, reduce the size of water and sewer mains.
Design residential screccs to accommodate average traffic estimates.
Use uciliry or sidewalk easements instead of right -oE -ways.
Place water supply systems and sanitary sewers in easements instead of right- of -ways.
and Exactions
Reduce or waive Fees, exactions, and /or development standards For particular rapes oFdevelopmenc
rental housin, second units, mixed use and inlill prolecrs, housing ;iftordable ro lo-.-
Z:' --
Moderace-income households).
allow payment of fees upon,cercilicate or Occupant'•". rather than prl0r CO bulldlll, Der M C ( itla
i
reduce develo Der construction Financing, costs and 0%'e -a!l daf %-elopmenc �:O)r't.
Association of Bay Area Governments "Zoa A a... C-25
ff- X 141 7- At�
PENDIX C Blueprint 2001
Relax dcvelopmenc standards, For example:
Fronc yard sec backs of 20 Feet or less
Minimum lot sizes oF6,000 square Feet or less
Loc width of 60 Feet or less.
Reduce parking requirements.
Provide flexible standards For second units co encourage their development.
ides and Enforcement Procedures
Allow use of alternative building design and construction materials and methods.
Issue building permits before subdivision approval so the developer can begin construction upon peanut
approval.
Coordinate inspection /enforcement activities For existing housing with information, technical assistance.
and the availabiliry of rehabilitation program grants /loans.
Allow rehabilitation using materials and methods as of dace oForiginal construction, unless a health or
safety hazard would result (Health and Safecy Code Section l i 922 (c)).
Use State Housing Law (SHL) codes without additional local requirements. Scace law prohibits
modihcacion oFSHL standards, except where local variations are necessary For reasons oFclimate, geolon.
or topography (Health and SaFecv Code Section 17978.0.
Off Site Improvement Requirements
Reduce street widths (e.g., 36 Feet or less) and right oFways (e.g., 56 Feet or less).
Reduce the number and size oFsidcwalks (e.g., on one side oFscreec only).
Use roll curbs instead of Formed curbs and guccers.
Increase spacing between manholes.
Allow multiple service laterals.
Allow common trenching For utilities.
Allow Fire hydrant intervals of 500 Feet or more.
Where appropriate, reduce the size of water and sewer mains.
Design residential streets to accommodate average traffic estimates:
Use utility or sidewalk easements instead of right - of -ways.
Place water supply systems and sanitary sewers in easements instead of right -oF -ways.
and Exactions
Reduce or waive Fees, exactions, and /or dcvelopmenc standards For particular types oF(levelopmcni: e. ..
rental housing, assisted housing, second units, mixed use and infili projecrs. housing aFFordable co lo.
moderate- income households).
allow payment of Fees upon certificate or occupancy rather than prior Co bulldtn`_ per,n C
reduce developer constmactlon financin`> cosy and ovcrall defv':lopmeni co;cs.
ation of Bay Area Governments 140�5 A a... C -25
state (Department of Mousing and Community (DeveC)pment
,36 Af)
How /s "use by right" Use by right means the use does not require a conditional use
permit, except when a mixed -use (commercial /industrial/
defined. residential) project is proposed. Use by right for all rental
multifamily residential housing is to be provided in accordance
with subdivision (f) of Section 65589.5.
Qz) ) / ,J A?)
What strategies can be The following approaches have been used by localities to
increase their total residential development capacity:
used to increase total
residential develoDrnent Upzone existing residential areas at appropriate densities to
facilitate development of affordable housing.
capacity., Prezone and annex land suitable for residential use.
L Establish Minimum Densities - Designate minimum densities
of development to assure that existing available land is not
underutilized.
L Institute Flexible Zoning - Allow various residential uses
within existing zones without requiring rezoning or conditional
approvals.
Allow and Encourage Mixed -Use Zoning - Permit housing in
certain non - residential zones either as part of a mixed -use
project or as a stand alone residential use.
Rezone underutilized land from nonresidential to residential
to expand the supply of available residential land.
Zone for promote and encourage infill compact. transit -
oriented walkable bikeable and pedestrian- friendly
developments to facilitate Smart Growth strategies and
uce-dayeklpment of non - residential land.
L Encourage development that to es a van age or existin
infrastructure with surplus capacity (e.g. recycling; compact,
infll, mixed use, manufacture , units).
e eve co and /or recycle underutilized existing land t ore
intensive uses.
Convert obsolete older public /institutional /commercial/
industrial buildings to residential use through adaptive reuse
and /or historic preservation.
Overzone - Create a surplus of land for residential
development during the current planning period of at least 20
percent more than the locality's share of the regional housing
need. Overzoning compensates for urban land left vacant
due to ownership and development constraints (about 10
per and creates a real surplus (10 percent). A sufficient
supply of land beyond the time frame of the element helps
prevent land shortages from bidding up land costs.
zs
Element Questions (<A-Wers
C
tune ?00]
state �De t o ojj�g a qireggular unity 06veCopncent
Allow small and size lot development.
Phase Additional Capital Improvements - Coincide capital
improvements with the demand for new construction.
�-, Access alternative capital improvement funding mechanisms
Such as Mello -Roos community facilities bonds, the
Infrastructure Bank, special assessment districts,
development agreements, general or special obligation
bonds, and /or the use of state and federal funds (e.g.
transportation funds) to expand infrastructure capacity.
Increase height limitations — Allow three stories in multifamily
zones at minimum.
Use innovative siting techniques — Approve Subdivision Maps
that can accommodate zero -lot -lines and half -plex
developments.
Promote clustering of new housing to help reduce new
infrastructure and housing development costs.
C- Increase Floor Area Ratios — Allow for larger buildings on
smaller lots and /or more units per lot by reducing the FAR
(total lot area divided by the total building area).
Establish No Net Loss Policy — Rezone equal amounts of
land to replace any residential land used for other than its
intended residential use.
r /
(^ • ` � J
/7 a 10Ca /i make While the land inventory may identify sufficient sites in 'the
y0W Ca aggreqate to accommodate the locality's total numerical share of
sufCient sites availab /e to the regional housing need assessment (RHNA), it may not identify
accommodate its share of sufficient sites with appropriate zoning and infrastructure to
the RHNA fora / /income accommodate the very low -, low- or moderate - income household
portion of the share of need. In these circumstances, the element
levels, particularly lower- must identify sites to address the need for lower- and moderate -
6 moderate - income income households.
households? Localities have developed various land use controls and
development incentives to encourage a ygLj2jy of housing types
for all income levels, including:
Xj3 Zone sites for higher density and more intensive residential
=OEncourage and a`j ca gas ssuch dasnito eedluce develoo gent
dent or
Zone sites for mobilehomes and mobiiehome park use.
Establish arental -only zone that provides for rental apartment
/ development in areas designated for higher density
residential use.
Questions aZAnswers
29
�/G b
jurce 2001
I
State (Department
(Deve(opment
that exceed those imposed on other developments in similar
zones. Additionally, the effect of a community's ordinances and
actions on accommodating the housing needs of the region must
be considered.
04� o: At
Mesta loca /itypro�ide No. However, a locality's ability to accommodate all units needed
during the planning period is best served by designating
adequate sites through appropriate zoning as early as possible. The most direct
appropriate zoning at procedure is for the locality to undertake rezoning when the
housing element is adopted. Although the program does not have
the beginning of the to ensure the provision of sites at the beginning of the planning
p /arming,oeriod? period, it must make provision for sites that will be available soon
enough in the planning period to reasonably permit develcoment
during the planning period. The locality may also commit to
subsequent zoning actions within the five -year schedule of the
housing program. Subsequent zoning allows the locality to meet
the site- specific rezoning provision (e.g., public notification and
hearing) according to a prescribed timetable.
Q411 J t
i f A)
How can a community Communities with limited vacant land should focus their land
inventory analysis on underutilized land, identify sites with the
with /itt /e vacant /and potential for recycling or rezoning and, opportunities for mixed
idertifysites to uses (residential and commercial, for example). Identification of
accommodate its entire these sites opportunities should be accompanied by programs
that encourage their development and /or reuse including
reg %oral share programs to initiate any necessary rezoning, establish appropriate
allocation? regulatory and /or financial incentives, re!ax development
standards (design criteria, parking, building height, setback
requirements, etc.), support more compact and higher density
residential developments, and facilitate the new construction of
multifamily rental and owner - occupied units. Examples . of
successful site programs for communities with limited vacant land
include second units, infill, transit oriented developments, and
mixed -use developments. Such developments are often located
in urban cores areas, Redevelopment Project Areas, adjacent to
existing neighborhoods, close to transit centers and established
businesses and services. Maximizing the use of underutilized
land through recycling leverages the use of existing infrastructure
and can reduce overall development costs.
Questions aZAnswers 31 dune 2001
state (Department
ty (Development
�EN/OVE OR MITIGATE GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
� Government Code Section 6558 (c� (3�
04// k ?)
when must a housing
element include
programs to address or
,,e no ve go vernmental
constraints?
41
What are examples of
programs localities have
used to reduce or
eliminate barriers to the
maintenance,
improvement, and
development of
housing?
A?)
For each policy, requirement, or procedure identified as a
governmental constraint, the element must include an appropriate
program action to eliminate or modify the constraint or
demonstrate how it will be offset by another policy or program.
P. 31 ___0
Questions C�Answers
A?)
The following are strategies communities have found appropriate
to remove regulatory barriers:
Land Use Controls
L Modify and /or reduce growth controls to ensure
accommodation of projected housing needs
Exempt affordable housing projects from growth control
ordinances
,23 Allow zero -lot line and cluster developments
iZ. , Relax development standards, for example:
■ Front yard set backs of 20 feet or less
• Minimum lot sizes of 6,000 square feet or less
• Lot width of 60 feet or less
Reduce parking requirements
Provide flexible standards for second units to encourage their
development'
Codes and Enforcement Procedures
Allow use of alternative building design and construction
materials and methods.
Issue building permits before subdivision approval so the
developer can begin construction upon permit approval.
Coordinate inspection /enforcement activities for existing
housing with information, technical assistance, and the
availability of rehabilitation program grants /loans.
Allow rehabilitation using materials and methods as of dace of
original construction, unless a health or safety hazard would
result (Health and Safety Code Section 17922 (c)).
�
, Use State Housing Law (SHL) codes without additional local
requirements. State law prohibits modification of SHL
standards, except where local variations are necessary for
reasons of climate,
Safety Code Section
37
geology, or topography (Health and
17958.5).
00dICb
June ?001
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES for:
CITY COUNCIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY
January 8, 2002
Tuesday
The concurrent meetings of the City of Rohnert Park for
the City Council, the Community Development Commission,
and the Rohnert Park Financing Authority, met this date in
regular session for a regular meeting to commence at
6:45 p.m. in the City Offices, 6750 Commerce Boulevard,
Rohnert Park, with Mayor Flores presiding.
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Flores called the regular session to order at
6:50 p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance.
ANNOUNCEMENT:
At 6:50 p.m., Mayor Flores ANNOUNCED that due to
technical problems with the cable transmission, the
City Council meeting would not be broadcast this
evening. The Mayor then apologized to the viewing
public and noted that the session would still be
recorded.
ROLL CALL:
Present: (5) Councilmembers Mackenzie, Reilly, and
Vidak- Martinez; Vice Mayor Spiro; and
Mayor Flores
Absent: (0) None
Staff present for all or part of the meeting: City
Manager Netter, City Attorney Strauss, Assistant City
Manager Donley, Planning and Community Development
Director Kaufman, City Engineer Gaffney, and Recreation
Director Barry.
City of Rohnert Park.
January 8, 2002
REMEMBRANCE:
*CUNCURRENT MEETiNGS MiNUTE6
Page ( 2 )
Mayor Flores noted the passing of longtime resident and
community activist Clara Brown Umland, who served on the
Cultural Arts Commission and worked at City High School.
He indicated that services will be held at the Church of
Jesus Christ on Country Club Drive tomorrow at 11:00 a.m.
1. MAYOR'S REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION:
Mayor Flores reported on the closed session which
commenced at approximately 6:00 p.m. to discuss matters
listed on the agenda attachment, representing an update.
LITIGATION MATTERS:
1. Las Casitas et al. v. City of Rohnert Park: Nothing
to report.
2.
Claim of
Iry
Sutley:
Nothing
to report.
3.
Possible
litigation,
one case:
Nothing to report.
3. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS, IF ANY (INFORMATIONAL ONLY):
(Out of order]
Mayor Flores asked the Councilmembers if there were any
informational communications to add to the agenda.
*INFORMATIONAL NOTE: Vice Mayor Spiro announced the
Winter 2002 Book Sale, sponsored by the Cotati - Rohnert
Park Unified School District and the Rohnert Park
Public Safety Officers' Association (RPPSOA), on
January 25 -26, 2002, at 6600 Hunter Drive. She noted
anyone interested in volunteering should call the
_ c _ i_ l _
Department of Public Sdiety at Do'±-Zevv.
*( -n„nri l member Vi rlak- Martinez discussed The Movement and
Act to Leave No Child Behind, a national policy vision
that incorporates the best practices and programs to
address the needs of America's children. She
DISTRIBUTED a letter from Marc Morial, Mayor of the City
of New Orleans, requesting an endorsement of the
movement. Council CONCURRED TO AGENDIZE the matter for
action at the next Council meeting.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(3 )
* Councilmember Mackenzie indicated that he would be
giving a report on the Water Advisory Committee meeting
under Agenda Item 15, "Council Committee and /or Other
Reports."
* Councilmember Vidak- Martinez indicated that she would
be giving a report on the Investors' Tourism Council
meeting.
2. APPROVAL OF CONCURRENT MEETING MINUTES FOR:
REGULAR CONCURRENT CITY MEETINGS - DECEMBER 11, 2001
SPECIAL CEREMONIAL MEETING - DECEMBER 13, 2001
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Vidak- Martinez, seconded by
Councilmember Mackenzie, the Regular Concurrent City
Meetings Minutes of December 11, 2001, and the Special
Ceremonial Meeting Minutes of December 13, 2001, were
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AS AMENDED:
* Councilmember Mackenzie: Special Ceremonial Meeting
Minutes, page 2, last paragraph, replace "Scotland,
the Great" with "Scotland the Brave."
4. YOUTH REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CITY COUNCIL FROM HIGH
SCHOOL YOUTH LEADERSHIP OF ROHNERT PARK SELECTIONS:
1. Recognizing Youth Representatives: Senior Adam Nordin
(Community Service Committee - 24 -Hour Relay Steering
Committee) was recognized.
*Youth Report /Comments, if any: Highlights of the
Youth Report included the following:
(1) December Canned Food Drive a success - over
32,000 cans collected;
(2) The Catamount, RCHS newspaper, ranked 9th in
the nation - DISTRIBUTED TO COUNCIL;
(3) Basketball season in full swing;
(4) 24 -Hour Relay Planning Committee meeting,
January 15, 2002, from 3:30 to 4:30 at the SCAYD
Burton office - call 793 -9030 if interested.
2. Other Youth Comments, if any: None.
5. SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATED STUDENTS, INC.,
REPRESENTATIVE:
1. Recognizing SSU ASI Representative Travis Tabares:
ASI Representative Tabares was recognized.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 . Page(4 )
2. SSU ASI Report /Comments, if any: ASI Representative
Tabares reported on several events /issues, with
highlights including the following:
(1) Sports updates available on the SSU website;
(2) Exended report on JUMP, ASI's community service
programs, including Adopt -a- Grandparent, Cougar
Club, Events Committee, and SOUP (Serving Our
Unfed People) - over 5,000 total hours of
volunteer time for JUMP this fall.
6. SCHEDULED APPEARANCES /PRESENTATIONS:
*MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS OF PROCLAMATIONS
1. Congratulating and Honoring Eagle Scout Andrew
Fitzpatrick Ryan: Eagle Scout Ryan came forward,
and Mayor Flores explained the numerous
accomplishments required to achieve the status of
Eagle Scout. The Mayor then read a portion of the
proclamation, and Council congratulated Eagle
Scout Ryan on his achievement.
2. Congratulating and Honoring Eagle Scout Eric
William Smith: Eagle Scout Smith was unable to
attend the meeting this evening, and Mayor Flores
indicated that he would be honored at a later time.
3. Expressing Appreciation to James Grundman, David
Rowley, and Joe French, of the City's Information
System, for their dedication, expertise, and
relentless hard work to win war against computer
virus and toxins: City Information System staffers
Grundman, Rowley, and French came forward and
were presented Resolutions of Appreciation for their
dedicated efforts in maintaining the City's
Information System.
7. UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES:
Mayor Flores stated that in compliance with State law,
The Brown Act, members of the public wishing to make a
comment may do so at this time, limited to 3 -5 minutes per
appearance, with a 30- minute limit.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(5 )
1. Albert Perron, 4735 Fairway Drive, was recognized and
noted that he had been before the Council on
November 27, 2001, to request City action in repairing
a broken wastewater line in front of his house. He
DISTRIBUTED a photo of said water line and indicated
that the problem has gotten worse. He again requested
that the City fix the water line.
2. David Carey, 4725 Fairway Drive, was recognized and
shared Mr. Perron's concerns over the City's lack of
action taken to repair the broken water line. He
discussed a noise problem stemming from the broken
water line.
Mayor Flores instructed both Mr. Perron and Mr. Carey to
come to the next Council meeting on January 22, 2002, to
discuss the matter. Furthermore, the Mayor DIRECTED City
Manager Netter to work with Public Works Manager Stephens
to resolve the matter immediately.
*************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
8. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Mayor Flores asked if there were any questions about
the matters on the Consent Calendar, which were explained
in the City Manager's Council Meeting Memo. The Mayor
signified removal of one Consent Calendar item for further
discussion as follows: Resolution No. 2002 -07 per
Councilmember Mackenzie's recommendation.
ACKNOWLEDGING THE CITY MANAGER /CLERK'S REPORT ON THE
POSTING OF THE MEETING'S AGENDA
APPROVAL OF BILLS /DEMANDS FOR PAYMENT CONCURRENTLY FOR:
*CITY OF ROHNERT PARK /CITY COUNCIL IN THE AMOUNT OF
$1,927,809.79
*COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION IN THE AMOUNT OF:
$849,243.05
ACCEPTING CASH /INVESTMENTS REPORT FOR MONTH END,
OCTOBER 31, 2001, CONCURRENTLY FOR:
*CITY OF ROHNERT PARK /CITY COUNCIL
*COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
* ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(6 )
Resolutions for Adoption:
2002 -01 EXTENDING CONDOLENCES TO THE FAMILY OF WILLIAM
"BILL" BALFOUR AND HONORING AND RECOGNIZING HIS
MANY YEARS OF SERVICE IN THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
2002 -02 ENDORSING THE ROHNERT PARK BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
APPLICATION
2002 -03 ENDORSING THE COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS
(COTS) SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT APPLICATION
2002 -04 ENDORSING THE SONOMA COUNTY ADULT AND YOUTH
DEVELOPMENT (SCAYD) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT APPLICATION
2002 -05 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SEALED PROPOSALS FOR NEW
E- 1NERGY- L'T.+FICIENT POOL HEATER AT RRNRC"TA POOL
2002 -06 ACCEPTING COMPLETION AND DIRECTING CITY ENGINEER
TO FILE NOTICE OF COMPLETION, MAGNOLIA PARK
POOL, PROJECT NO. 1999 -09
2002 -08 HONORING AND RECOGNIZING KENDRA J. HEATH,
WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS EXAMINER /ADJUSTER
AT THE REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND
ON THE OCCASION OF HER RETIREMENT
2002 -09 REJECTING THE INSUFFICIENT CLAIM OF BILL AND
MARIE SLACK (RE. ALLEGED AUTO DAMAGE)
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Mackenzie, seconded by
Councilmember Vidak- Martinez, with the exception of
Resolution No. 2002 -07, the Consent Calendar as otherwise
outlined on the meeting s agenda was - uriANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Item for Consideration:
2002 -07 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN BENEFITS FOR THE ROHNERT
PARK CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember Mackenzie requested clarification
regarding the date of April 30, 1997, in the resolution,
and staff responded to further Council inquiries.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(7 )
Council discussion concluded and upon MOTION by Vice Mayor
Spiro, seconded by Councilmember Vidak- Martinez,
Resolution 2002 -07 was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED with the
following amendments:'
(1) Section A, second paragraph, per City Attorney
Strauss, amend to read: "The City shall pay any
deductible or co- payments required by Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan, Inc., California North
Region (S Coverage), Health Plan of the Redwoods
(Empire Plan), Blue Cross Prudent Buyer Plan for
those members of the City Council in office on the
date this resolution is adopted and who were
elected before April 30, 1997;
(2) Section H, second paragraph, delete "Resolution
87 -117" and amend it to read "Resolution 89 -117.
*************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
9. PLANNING AND ZONING MATTERS:
File No. 2001 - 074 -1: Consideration of an Ordinance
adding Chapter 17.70, Housing. Trust Fund and
Inclusionary /In -Lieu Fee Requirements, to the Rohnert
Park Municipal Code, including consideration of the
adequacy of a Negative Declaration for same.
1. Staff Report: Planning and Community Development
Director Kaufman shared the contents of the staff
report and responded to Council questions.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: Mayor Flores OPENED the Public
Hearing at 7:40 p.m.
1. Kevin Pohlson, 5960 Inglewood Drive, Pleasonton, was
recognized and noted that he represents Brookfield
Homes regarding the University District Specific Plan.
He DISTRIBUTED AND REVIEWED A LETTER, ATTACHED TO THE
ORIGINAL SET OF MINUTES, outlining Brookfield Homes'
comments on the proposed ordinance and how it might
apply to the University District LLC portion of the
University District Specific Plan satisfying the 15%
requirement of the 1,405 housing units. Furthermore,
he reviewed comments in the letter regarding the
Inclusionary /In -Lieu Fee Ordinance, and he provided
ABAG Blueprint 2001 and HCD documentation to supplement
the recommendations.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(8 )
Mayor Flores CLOSED the Public Hearing at 7:55 p.m.
3. Council Discussion /Action: Staff responded to
further Council inquiries.
Resolution for Adoption:
2002 -10 CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN
ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 17.70, HOUSING TRUST
FUND AND INCLUSIONARY /IN -LIEU FEE REQUIREMENTS,
TO THE ROHNERT PARK MUNICIPAL CODE
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Reilly, seconded by
Vice Mayor Spiro, Resolution 2002 -10 was UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVED.
Ordinance for Introduction:
No. 677 ADDING CITY OF ROHNERT PARK MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 17.70, HOUSING TRUST FUND AND
TNC'T.TTGTnNARV /TN- T.T'F'.TT FEF. RF.QTTTREMENTS
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Reilly, seconded by
Vice Mayor Spiro, Ordinance for Introduction No. 677 was
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED with the following conditions:
(1) Section C, "Alternative Equivalent Action,"
language outlining the transfer of units from
one developer to another, including a transfer fee,
would be added as an example of alternative
equivalent action;
(2) Section D, "In -Lieu Housing Fee," consideration of
adding language limiting the number of units for
payment of the fees on the size of the projects;
(3) Further consideration of staff comments and HCD
response to staff inquiries.
10. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2002:
Mayor Flores referred Councilmembers to the "Year 2002
Liaison Assignments" document in the agenda packets.
2002 Liaison Assignments are as follows:
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park
January 8, 2002
Regular Inside Agencies
Bicycle Advisory
COYF
Cultural Arts
Housing Finance Authority
Rent Appeals Board
Parks & Recreation
Planning
Senior Citizens
Sister Cities
*CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
Page ( 9 )
Regular Outside Agencies
ABAG
Chamber of Commerce
Library Advisory
Mayors' & Councilmembers' Working Group
Regional Wastewater
School District /Cities
Sonoma County Tourism - Investors
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
Sonoma County Water Agency
Regular Inside Subcommittees
Assn. of Retired Employees (ARECORP)
Cable Television
Golf Courses
Hospital Site
Mobile Home Parks
Performing Arts Center
Rohnert Park Stadium
Temporary Committees
Canon Manor
Channel 22
City Hall Planning
City Land Use /Stadium Vicinity
Commissions' Policy Review
Economic Development
Executive Committee
Founders' Day
General Plan Implementation Oversight
Garbage
Library Planning
Rohnert Park Youth Summit
Technology
Telecommunications
Liaison Alternate
JM
JR
VVM
JM
AF
LS
LS
VVM
LS
VVM
JR
AF
AF
JM
AF
VVM
LS
JR
Liaison Alternate
LS
JM
VVM
AF
JR
AF
AF
LS
AF
VVM
VVM
AF
VVM
LS
JM
LS
AF
JM
Councilmembers
AF
& VVM
AF
& JM
LS
& AF
LS
& JR
VVM
& LS
LS
& AF
AF
& JR
Councilmembers
JM
& VVM
AF
& JR
JM
& AF
JR
& VVM
VVM
& JM
LS
& VVM
AF
& LS
LS
& AF
JM
& VVM
VVM
& JM
AF
& JR
LS
JM
LS
& AF
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(10)
Councilmember Mackenzie clarified that the Sonoma County
Water Agency refers to the Water Advisory Committee which
meets on the first Monday of each month. At the request
of Vice Mayor Spiro, Mayor Flores clarified the difference
between the Cable Television Subcommittee, which will
handle AT &T compliance and upgrade issues, and the
Telecommunications Subcommittee. The Mayor noted that
the Cable Television Subcommittee will schedule a
meeting with Management Analyst Fogle to address relevant
matters.
Furthermore, Council CONCURRED TO AGENDIZE the matter of
the General Plan Implementation Oversight Subcommittee
for a full Council discussion at the next Council meeting.
11. COMMISSION /COMMITTEE /BOARD APPOINTMENTS - COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS FOR VACANCIES AND /OR
TERMS EXPIRED DECEMBER 31, 2001:
1. Bicycle Advisory Committee:
In order to fill the vacancy due to Christopher Costello's
resignation, Mayor Flores DIRECTED STAFF to advertise the
position and instructed any interested members of the
public to contact City Hall.
2. Housing Financing Authority
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Vidak- Martinez, seconded by
Vice Mayor Spiro, Council UNANIMOUSLY AFFIRMED the resident
_'^,...-ions re- appointment at large of James F. McGinnis and
ratified the December 11, 2001 resident re- election for the
re- appointment of Patrick Reymond, as members of the
Housing Financing Authority, who will respectively serve
two -year terms to expire December 31, 220"01-3).
*CLERICAL PROCEDURAL CORRECTION ABOVE for 1/8/02 City Council meeting by Deputy City Clerk J. Hauff for
clarification of "at large" City Council re- appointment S City Council ratification of the resident election.
(deletion lined out /addition underlined)
3. Mobile Home Parks Rent Appeals Board:
Upon MOTION by Vice Mayor Spiro, Council UNANIMOUSLY
AFFIRMED the re- appointment of Michael Caalim as
Mayor Spiro's nomination for a two -year term to
expire December 31, 2003.
Upon MOTION by Councilmember Reilly, Council UNANIMOUSLY
AFFIRMED the re- appointment of Katherine Collins as
Councilmember Reilly's nomination for a two -year term to
expire December 31, 2003.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(11)
Councilmember Vidak- Martinez REQUESTED TO AGENDIZE filling
the vacancy due to Michael Muchmore's lack of interest in
re- appointment until the next Council meeting to allow her
time to review applications for the position.
4. Sister Cities Relations Committee:
Upon MOTION by Vice Mayor Spiro, seconded by
Councilmember Mackenzie, Council UNANIMOUSLY AFFIRMED the
re- appointments *at large of Gordon Adam, Carol Grubler,
Susan Harrow, and Keiko M. Monraz, who will respectively
serve two -year terms to expire December 31, 2003.
*CLERICAL PROCEDURAL CORRECTION ABOVE for 1/8/02 City Council meeting by Deputy City Clerk J.Hauff for
clarification of "at large" City Council re- appointments (addition underlined)
12. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - CONSIDERATION OF 2001 -02
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION:
1. Staff Report: Recreation Director Barry gave a
brief overview of the staff report provided to
Council in the agenda packets.
2. Council Discussion /Action: Councilmember Reilly
clarified that he gave a rating of "A" to the
Rohnert Park Community Library and a rating of "B"
to the Benecia Park Youth Center Remodel. City
Manager Netter indicated that he will be meeting
with Director Public Safety Bullard to discuss the
needs of the department, and he will bring that
information to the upcoming six -month budget review
meeting for the Council. Council then CONCURRED
with the results of the Council rankings of the
2001 -02 Capital Improvement Projects.
RECESS: Mayor Flores declared a recess at
approximately 8:20 p.m.
RECONVENE: Mayor Flores reconvened the Council at
approximately 8:28 p.m. with all of the
Councilmembers present.
13. GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM - MATTERS RELATED
TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROCESS, IF ANY:
1. Process for considering proiects that var
significantly from current programs and policies -
Consideration of General Plan Subcommittee to
provide feedback to applicant for their proposal
prior to processing the project proposal through the
Planning Commission and City Council:
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(12)
*Council Discussion /Action: Councilmembers shared
their perspectives on the matter, and Mayor Flores
indicated that the issue will come back before the
City Council at the next Council meeting for full
discussion as an action item.
2. Other, if any: None.
14. BACK -UP ALARM ORDINANCE REVIEW - RESPONDING TO AL BARR
PROPOSAL:
1. City Attorney Report: City Attorney Strauss
summarized the contents of her staff report,
noting that she would report back to Mr. Barr when
she gets a response from Michael Mason, Chief
Counsel for CAL -OSHA, regarding the validity of
the proposed ordinance.
2. Council Discussion /Direction: At this time, Mayor
Flores called forward a member of the public
l
interested iii speax_ iiiy oii Liiis issue.
1. Al Barr, 5746 Dexter Circle, was recognized and
thanked the Council and staff for following through on
his proposed back -up alarm ordinance. He REQUESTED
a copy of City Attorney Strauss' January 8, 2002,
memorandum, which was then SUBMITTED to him.
15. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND /OR OTHER REPORTS, IF ANY:
1. Water Advisory Committee: Councilmember Mackenzie
reported on the January 7 meeting of the Committee,
including a discussion of the need for cities to
discuss a draft vision statement and to consider a
niimhar of nnggi hl P i sque s in drafting a new
agreement with SCWA over the next two years. He
also noted that the Committee is awaiting a
biological assessment from the National Marine
Fisheries Service in terms of threatened species
in the Russian River watershed. At the suggestion
of Councilmember Mackenzie, Mayor Flores DIRECTED
STAFF to set up a workshop for the February 12
Council meeting to discuss a draft vision statement
and to review the relevant issues regarding the
new agreement with SCWA.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(13)
2. Investors' Committee for Sonoma County Tourism
Council: Councilmember Vidak- Martinez showed how
Rohnert Park is well featured in this year's
Visitors' Guide. She then DISTRIBUTED an article
from today's Press Democrat, entitled, "Lodging
surcharge may build ad fund," and she discussed the
implications for Rohnert Park. Council CONCURRED
TO AGENDIZE the matter of a lodging surcharge for
a full discussion at the next Council meeting.
16. COMMUNICATIONS:
Communications per the attached outline were brought to
the attention of the Councilmembers.
* Councilmember Reilly, per letter from A. Estrada,
resident, requesting recognition for local young people
serving in the military: Council CONCURRED with
Councilmember Reilly's suggestion to DIRECT STAFF to
draft a resolution and /or proclamation honoring local
young residents and other members of the community
currently serving in the military.
*Vice Mayor Spiro, per a phone call she received today
regarding the unprofessional and vulgar manner in which
a resident was treated by a local towing company: City
Manager Netter REQUESTED that Vice Mayor Spiro direct
the citizen to put the specifics of the complaint in
writing so that staff may pursue appropriate action.
*Mayor Flores, per information from Councilmember
Vidak- Martinez, regarding the illness of Marie
Vinsick, a member of the Mobile Home Parks Rent Appeals
Board: At the suggestion of Mayor Flores, Council
CONCURRED to DIRECT STAFF to send flowers to Ms. Vinsick
at Kaiser Hospital and to convey Council's best wishes
for her recovery.
17. MATTERS FROM /FOR COUNCIL:
1. Garage conversions /parking issues: Vice Mayor
Spiro raised concerns about garage conversions,
and City Attorney Strauss indicated that the
matter will come before the Planning Commission
this month and in due course before the City
Council in the upcoming weeks.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEE'riNGS M1NUT.Eb
January 8, 2002 Page(14)
City Manager Netter DISTRIBUTED the Planning
Commission's January 10, 2002, staff report
concerning proposed amendments to the Rohnert Park
Municipal Code regarding exceptions to the
off - street parking requirements in the City's
residential zoning districts. Vice Mayor Spiro
raised concerns about vehicles with signage parking
on City streets.
Upon MOTION by Vice Mayor Spiro, seconded by Councilmember
Reilly, a motion to place the matter of a review of the
parking ordinance under "Matters from /for Council" was
APPROVED 4 -1 with Councilmember Vidak- Martinez dissenting.
2. Mavors' & Councilmembers' Association, Cit
Selection Committee yearly meeting, Thursday,
January 10, 2002 6.30 p.m., Doubletree Hotel,
Rohnert Park: INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY - All
Councilmembers invited to attend.
3. Tninfi MPPtInas Schedule for SSU President's Cabinet,
City of Cotati• and Cotati - Rohnert Park Unified
School District: Mayor Flores indicated that he
will be meeting with City Manager Netter to review
possible dates for meetings with SSU's President's
Cabinet, the City of Cotati, and the Cotati -
Rohnert Park Unified School District.
4. Other informational items, if any: None.
18. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
1. Appointment of Tom Bullard - Director of Public
Safety: City Manager Netter referred Council to
the e -mail and the press release regarding the
appointment of Mr. Bullard. The City Manager
noted that a small celebration is planned for
mid - February to honor Director Public Safety
Bullard for his years of service and his
achievement.
2. Other informational items, if any:
a. Monthly Proiect Update Reports: City Manager
Netter stated that he will be presenting the
Council with a monthly report on project updates
at the first Council meeting of each month in an
effort to assist the Council in tracking each
project.
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority
City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES
January 8, 2002 Page(15)
19. OTHER UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES:
At this time, Mayor Flores called forward any members
of the public wishing to speak. No one responded.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, Mayor Flores
ADJOURNED the meeting at approximately 8:56 p.m.
Katy Leonard,
Certified Shorthand Reporter
CSR No. 11599
Armando Flores,
Mayor
City of Rohnert Park
*City Council /Community Development Commission/
Rohnert Park Financing Authority