The URL can be used to link to this page

2005/06/28 City Council Resolution (20)RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 209 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK MAKING DETERMINATIONS, CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEEDINGS AND DESIGNATING "THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO COLLECT AND RECEIVE ASSESSMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL FUND FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 05 -1 (SEWER FORCE MAIN PROJECT NO. 2003 -11) WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore adopted Resolution No. 2005 -139 (the "Resolution of Intention ") declaring its intention to order the acquisition and construction of the improvements described in the Resolution of hltention (the "Improvements ") and to form Assessment District No. 05 -1 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) (the "Assessment District ") under the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code, "the Act "); and WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore preliminarily approved a report prepared under and pursuant to the Act and, in particular, Section 10204 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Engineer's Report"); and WHEREAS, this City Council fixed June 28, 2005, at the hour of 7:00 p_m. at the regular meeting place of the City, 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, California, as the time and place of hearing protests and objections to the improvements proposed in the Engineer's Report to be made, the extent of the Assessment District proposed to be created, and/or to the proposed assessment; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused notice to be given of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, the filing of the Engineer's Report and the time and place and purpose of said hearing, all as required by the Act and by Section 53753(c) of the California Governunent Code and Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution ( "Article XIIID" ), and WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the Resolution of Intention, the owners of certain properties have requested that such properties be included within the boundaries of the Assessment District and the owners of certain other properties have requested that changes be made in the amount proposed to be assessed against such properties; and WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore approved an amended boundary map for the Assessment District reflecting the inclusion therein of the additional properties referred to above, and WHEREAS, a final Engineer's Report (the "Final Report ") has been prepared setting forth the Improvements to be acquired and constructed and the changes referred to above, and the Final Report has been filed with the City Council and has been available for review by the property owners within the proposed Assessment District; and WHEREAS, at the time and place stated in the aforesaid notice, a hearing was duly held by this City Council and, during the course of said hearing, the Final Report was duly presented and considered, all written protests and objections received, if any, were duly presented, read, heard and DOCSOC I 113808%1,24675-0001 considered and all persons appearing at said hearing and desiring to be heard in the matter of said Final Report were heard, and a full, fair and complete hearing has been conducted; and WHEREAS, this City Council has received all ballots filed with the City Clerk prior- to the conclusion of the hearing, and the Assessment Engineer, on behalf of the City Clerk, has counted all ballots for and against the formation of the Assessment District as provided in Article XIIID; and WHEREAS, this City Council has considered the assessment proposed in the Final Report and the evidence presented at said hearing-, and WHEREAS, it appears that the Director of Finance is covered by a blanket fidelity bond covering the faithful performance of the duties imposed by law in an amount deemed by this City Council to be adequate; and WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 10424 of the California Streets and Highways Code, funds collected by the Director of Finance pursuant to an assessment under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 are required to be placed in a special improvement fund designated.by the name of the assessment proceeding; and BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it does hereby find, determine, resolve and order- as follows: Section 1. The public hearing referred to in the recitals hereof has been duly held, and each and every step in the proceedings prior to and including the hearing has been duly and regularly taken- This City Council is satisfied with the correctness of the Final Report, including the assessment and diagram and the maximum annual assessment for administrative expenses, the proceedings and all matters relating thereto. Section 2. The property within the Assessment District to be assessed as shown in the Final Report will be benefited by the Improvements. Section 3. City Council overrules and denies any and all protests, objections and appeals made in regard to these proceedings, and it finds and determines that a majority of the ballots received are in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots were weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. Section 4. The amount of the assessments shown in the Final Report and the proposed maximum annual assessment per parcel for administrative expenses shown are confirmed and are fixed in said amounts. Section 5. The amounts to be assessed against the individual parcels shown on the assessment diagram contained in the Final Report are hereby approved and confnned; and the City Council is authorized and directed to endorse the fact and date of such approval on the Final Report. Section 6. The assessment diagram and assessment is to be placed on file in the office of the Superintendent of Streets, and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to record, or cause to be recorded, the assessment diagram and assessment in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Sonoma as required by Sections 3114, 10401 and 10402 of the California Streets and Highways 2 DOCSOC/ 1 1 13808v 1 /24675 -0001 Code; and the City Clerk shall record, or cause to be recorded, a Notice of Assessment as required by Section 3114 of said Code. Section 7. The Superintendent of Streets is authorized and directed to give notice of the recordation of the assessment, as provided in Section 10404 of said Code. Section 8. The Director- of Finance is designated to receive the assessments paid during the 30 day cash payment period which shall commence on the date of recording the assessment diagram with the County Recorder. Section 9. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 28tbay of June , 2005 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK cam. C-46% —, S1_ Mayor FLORES: AYE SMITH: AYE SPRADLIN: AYE VIDAK- MARTINEZ: AYE, MACKENZIE: AYE AYES: (5) NOES: (0) ABSENT: (0) ABSTAIN: (0) CERTIFICATION 1, Judy Hauff, City Clerk of the City of Roltnert Park, do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of City Council Resolution No. 2005 -2_09, adopted by the City Council for the City of Rohnert Park at a regular meeting held on the28*day of June 2005 at its fully noticed and posted location by the vote therein stated, the original of which resolution is on file in the office of the Citv Clerk of cairl c;tv DATED: DOCSOC /1 1 13808v]/24675-0001 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ASSESSMENT DISTRICT OS -Ol (SEWER FORCE MAIN PROJECT NO. 2003-11) FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Prepared for: ROIAN ERT PARR - G2 CA CIPOR1�r City of Rohnert Park June 14, 2005 Prepared by: eo I�.L,�ZI�ELL:.Y C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E- R S 495 Tescom Circle Santa Rosa, CA 95401 -4696 (707) 523 -1010 www.w- and -k.com 02056- 05003 City of'RohnertPark Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Assessment....................................................................................................... ............................... 1 SummaryCost Estirnatc ................................................................................... ............................... 1 Description of Improvements .......................................................................... ............................... 3 Engineer's Cost Estimate ................................................................................. ............................... 4 Methodof Assessment ..................................................................................... ............................... 4 General......................................................................................................... ............................... 4 Benefit.......................................................................................................... ............................... 5 Considerations from Proposition 218 ......................................:............... ............................... 5 General Benefits Provided by the Project ................................................ ............................... 6 Unique and Special Benefits Provided by the Project ............................. ............................... 6 Method for Allocating Costs ........................................................................ ............................... 6 Proposed Development Patterns .............................................................. ............................... 7 ApportionmentFormul a ............................................................................... ............................... 8 Boundary Map and Assessment Diagram ........................................................ ............................... 8 Assessment Roll and Names & Addresses of Property Owners ...................... ............................... 9 Plans and Specifications .................................................................................. ............................... 9 Maximum Annual Assessment for Administrative Costs & Expenses ........... ............................... 9 Certificates..................................................................................................... ............................... 10 Appendix 1 Assessment Roll Boundry Map and Assessment Diagram 02056 -05003 1 June 14, 2005 City o f Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, on May 10, 2005, the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, State of California ( "the City "), under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (the Act) adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings No. 2005 -139 (Resolution) for the acquisition and /or construction of the public improvements more particularly therein described in and for Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11, the "Assessment District "); WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to make and file a report presenting a general description of any works and appliances already installed and any other property necessary or convenient for the operation of the improvements, plans and specifications for the proposed construction, estimate of costs, maps and descriptions of lands and easements to be acquired, and diagram and assessment of and upon the subdivisions of land within the assessment district, to which Resolution and the description of said proposed improvements therein contained reference is hereby made for further particulars; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under the Act and the order of the City Council, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of said acquisitions, work and improvements, and the costs and expenses incidental thereto which specifically benefit the assessment district and are to be paid by the assessment district. The amount to be paid for said acquisitions, work and improvements, and the expenses incidental thereto is generally as follows: SUMMARY COST ESTIMATE And, I do hereby assess and apportion the Balance to Assessment of the Total Cost of said acquisitions, work and improvements upon the several lots, pieces or parcels or portions of lots or subdivisions of land specifically benefited thereby and liable therefore, severally and respectively, in accordance with the special benefits to be received by such subdivisions, respectively, from the acquisitions and improvements. These pieces, parcels or portion of lots or subdivisions of land are hereinafter numbered to correspond with the numbers upon the attached Assessment Diagram. The portions of land and apportioned assessments are more particularly set forth in Appendix 1, attached herein, and incorporated by reference. 02056 -05003 1 Jwie 14, 2005 1 2 3 As Preliminarily Approved As Confirmed and Recorded As Modified After Recorded Construction Costs $16,800,000.00 $16,800,000.00 Incidental Expenses $1,443,405.25 $1,731,276.11 Total Costs $18,243,405.25 $18,531,276.11 Estimate Contributions $(14,138,860.73) $(13,567,410.43) Balance to Assessment $4,104,544.52 $4,963,865.68 And, I do hereby assess and apportion the Balance to Assessment of the Total Cost of said acquisitions, work and improvements upon the several lots, pieces or parcels or portions of lots or subdivisions of land specifically benefited thereby and liable therefore, severally and respectively, in accordance with the special benefits to be received by such subdivisions, respectively, from the acquisitions and improvements. These pieces, parcels or portion of lots or subdivisions of land are hereinafter numbered to correspond with the numbers upon the attached Assessment Diagram. The portions of land and apportioned assessments are more particularly set forth in Appendix 1, attached herein, and incorporated by reference. 02056 -05003 1 Jwie 14, 2005 City of Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report As required by the Act, an Assessment Diagram is hereto attached showing the Assessment District and also the boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of land within said Assessment District as the same existed at the time of the passage of said Resolution, each of which subdivisions having been given a separate number upon said Diagram. Said assessment is made upon the several subdivisions of land within said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by said subdivisions, respectively, from said improvement. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property. Each subdivision of land assessed is described in the within Assessment Roll by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Sonoma for the Fiscal Year 2004 -2005 and includes all of such parcel excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or right of way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Notice is hereby given that serial and /or tenn improvement bonds to represent unpaid assessments and bear and interest at the rate of not to exceed twelve percent (12 %) per annum, or such higher rate of interest as may be authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by Division 10 of the Streets and Highway Code, the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 and the last installment of such bonds shall mature not to exceed forty (40) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date. Under the Resolution of Intention, the requirement of Division 4 of the California Streets and Highways Code (The Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 193 1) are acknowledged to have been expressly waived in the petitions submitted by the property owners. Dated: 2005 Engineer of Work By: Mary Grace Pawson, P.E. RCE 044573 02056 -05003 2 June 14, 2005 City of Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS Within the limits of the City of Rohnert Park and the County of Sonoma, the construction and /or acquisition of the following Improvements, including all planning, design, contingencies, construction administration and general administration services, the acquisition of all necessary rights of way, the acquisition of licenses, franchises and permits and the construction of all auxiliary work necessary and /or convenient to the accomplishment thereof, in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park, together with the incidental costs of financing including but not limited to, capitalized interest, discounts, legal, financial advisory services, engineering and appraisals: 1. The Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11 including a new 30 -inch sewer interceptor /outfall extending from the City's terminal pump station to the City of Santa Rosa's Subregional Water Reclamation Facility and generally following "Wilfred Route" as described in Facility Plan and 10% Design Report for said project. 2. Any necessary modifications to the City's Tenninal Pump Station and existing 24 -inch interceptor / outfall required to allow the Sewer Force Main Project to function as an integrated system. 02056 -05003 -3 June 14, 2005 City of Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE The Assessment District is intended to finance new development's share of the new interceptor /outfall sewer and the required upgrades to the pump station and existing interceptor outfall. The City anticipates undertaking this project in two phases and the cost estimate below is broken out by project phase. Item Quantity Unit As Preliminarily Unit Cost Approved Subtotals Construction Costs New Sewer Interceptor /Outfall Construction (1) 1 LS $9,100,000 Design & Management (2) 1 LS $1,800,000 Pump Station and Interceptor /Outfall Rehabilitation Construction (2) 1 LS $5,100,000 Design & Management (2) 1 LS $800,000 Subtotal Construction Costs $16,800,000 Contribution for General Benefits $(13,567,410) Subtotal To Assessment $3,232,590 $3,232,590 Financing Costs Capitalized Interest (3 years @ 6.5 %) 1 LS $967,954 Bond Reserve (10 %) 1 LS $496,387 Bond Discount (2 %) 1 LS $99,277 City Administration (1 %) 1 LS $49,639 Bond Counsel 1 LS $59,639 Disclosure Counsel 1 LS $25,000 Assessment Engineering 1 LS $10,000 Bond Printing 1 LS $15,000 Fiscal Agent 1 LS $5,000 Incidental Contingency 1 LS $3,381 Subtotal Financing Costs $1,731,276 Balance to Assessment $4,963,866 $4,963,866 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Formation of the City's Assessment District 05 -01 provides the mechanism necessary to finance the acquisition or construction of certain public improvements necessary to permit development of the Northeast, University District, Southeast, Northwest, Stadium Lands Specific Plan Areas and the proposed Sonoma Mountain Village District in accordance with the approved General Plan of the City. The Improvements proposed to be financed through the Assessment District provide for general benefits in to all properties in the City's sewer service area and special 02056 -05003 4 June 14, 2005 City of Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -1.1) Final Engineer's Report benefits to the parcels of land within the Assessment District boundaries. The Assessment District provides the mechanism for financing the costs of the special benefits. Contributions from the City's Sewer Enterprise and its Public Facilities Fee Program provide the financing mechanism for the general benefit contribution. The proposed Assessment District is being formed under the authority of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (the "Act ") and Article XIIID of the California State Constitution together with its implementing legislation, (collectively "Proposition 218 "), which require that local agencies levy assessments according to special benefit. Costs and expenses of the proposed Improvement(s) must be apportioned against the properties by a formula or method which proportionally and equitably distributes the costs in direct proportion to the estimated special benefits these parcels receive from the improvements. Neither the Act nor Proposition 218 specifies the method that is used to apportion the benefits. This responsibility rests with the Assessment Engineer, who recommends the apportionment of costs based upon an analysis of the special and direct benefit to be received by each parcel in the Assessment District from the particular proposed Improvement. The approval of assessment rests with the City Council, who may approve the proposed assessments after hearing all testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing and tabulating the assessment ballots previous submitted by all record owners of property within the Assessment District. Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council must make the final determination whether or not the assessment apportionment has been made in direct proportion to the estimated special benefits received by each parcel. Assessment ballot tabulation will be finalized at this time and, if the majority of the assessment ballots submitted, weighted by the assessment amount are in opposition to levy of assessments, then the proceedings must be abandoned. If not, the City Council may authorize the levy of assessments. The following section sets forth the methodology used to apportion the costs of the improvements to each parcel in the proposed Assessment District. Benefit Considerations firom Proposition 218 In November 1996, the voters of California approved Proposition 218, which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California State Constitution. Proposition 218 added new procedures and requirements for all assessments. Particularly, Proposition 218 requires the following: The assessment proceedings must identify all parcels which will have special benefit conferred upon them, including property owned by Federal, State or Local government agencies. "Special benefit" means "particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large." General enhancement of property value is not considered to be a "special benefit." 02056 -05003 5 June 14, 2005 City of Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report The assessment on a parcel may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on the parcel. The improvements proposed to be included in Assessment. District 05 -01 must meet the special benefit test of Proposition 218. Additionally, the assessment on each parcel must not exceed the cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on the parcel. General Benefits Provided by the Project The Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11 has been sized to provide service to the City's sewer service area through General Plan buildout, including all existing development and all new development. Existing user General Benefit is approximately $12.68 million or 75% of total project costs (not included in the Assessment District). The remaining 25% of project costs benefit new development. The properties in the Assessment District account for approximately 78% of new development. The remaining share of the costs for new development also represent a general benefit and will be collected through mitigation fees to be collected at the time the building permits are pulled. This total general benefit is equal to the existing users share and the share of new development not in the District. The total general benefit contribution is $13,567,410. Unique and Special Benefits Provided by the Project The Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11 provides unique and special benefit to the properties within the Assessment District. These benefits include: Provision of wastewater collection infrastructure to serve the proposed development; except as described above, this infrastructure is provided for the benefit of the property within this Assessment District. Compliance with the City's requirements that all Specific Plan demonstrate adequate infrastructure service to support development. Method for Allocating Costs The proposed Assessment District finances wastewater pumping conveyance facilities. Wastewater flow patterns (often measured in gallons per day or "gpd ") detennine the size of pumping and conveyance facilities. In general, costs for wastewater system improvements are most fairly apportioned according to demand placed on the system by benefiting property. This can generally be measures by water consumption or wastewater flow and the City uses this flow - based methodology to compute its rates for sewer usage. However, with this Assessment District, the assessment must be fixed for the term of the bonds. The City's Public Facilities Finance Plan established a method for "normalizing" wastewater flow patterns within a Common Use Factor or "CUF ". The CUF relates the average population from various land uses to one another. Since average wastewater flow is fundamentally related to population this methodology provides a system for allocating costs between various types of 02056 -05003 6 June 14, 2005 City of Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report existing and new land use designations. Essentially the CUF captures the portion of the system capacity that is designed to serve each property. The Public Facilities Finance Plan calculated the CUF for each type of existing and proposed land use based on either the average residential population, as established by the City's General Plan or the average employee density, as calculated from U.S. Census Data and the City's General Plan.1 Table 1, below lists the Common Use Factors for each major land use category in the City. Table 1 Common Use Factors for Various Land Use Classes Land Use Class Unit CUF /Unit Single Family Residential EA 3.2000 Multi - Family Residential EA 2.0000 General Office 1 000s 0.3287 Hotel /Motel 1 000s 1.0539 Strip Retail 1 000s 1.8388 Shopping Center Retail 1 000s 1.7998 Industrial /Warehousing 1 000s 0.6575 All costs associated with special benefits arising from the project shall be apportioned based on the common use factors associated with the proposed land use on the parcel. Property dedicated for future public use, primarily parks, is exempted from this assessment. This type of property satisfies other conditions of development imposed on the property within the Assessment District and helps to create the benefits realized by residential and non - residential development. Because these types of uses are created as conditions of development, they do not experience the unique and special benefits provided to privately owned property in the proposed Assessment District. The property within the proposed Assessment District is not yet subdivided and the assessment method included an examination and review of the proposed land use patterns in order fairly allocate costs to the existing parcel configurations. It is the intent of this report to achieve equivalent assessments on equivalent land uses once the final subdivision process is complete. The method used to establish the assessments on each major area proposed to be developed is described in detail below and is intended to assist in future reapportionment activity. Proposed Development Patterns The property within the proposed Assessment District is subject to the City's Specific Planning Process. The proposed Assessment District includes all or a portion of five major Specific Plan Areas and the Sonoma Mountain Village area which has not yet completed its planning application. The planned developments included in this Assessment District are described below. ' Refer to City of Rohnert Park, Public Facilities Finance Plan, May 2004, Section 3.4.2 for a detailed calculation of the Common Use Factors. 02056 -05003 7 June 14, 2005 City o f'Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report Northwest SPA: The proposed Assessment District includes just under 80 acres in the 170 acre Northwest SPA. Petitions have been submitted covering 6 Assessor's Parcels. Proposed land uses include 495 multi - family residential units and approximately 495,000 square feet of commercial use and 77,000 square feet of industrial use. Northeast SPA: The proposed Assessment District includes 113.49 acres in the 274 acre Northeast SPA. Petitions have been submitted covering 9 Assessor's Parcels. Proposed land uses include 463 single family residential units. University District SPA: The proposed Assessment District includes approximately 260 acres in the 300 acre University District SPA. Petitions have been submitted covering 9 Assessor's Parcels. Land Uses include 1419 residential units and approximately 250,000 square feet of commercial land uses. Southeast SPA: The proposed Assessment District includes approximately 80 acres and 1 Assessor's Parcel in the Southeast SPA. Land uses include 499 residential units and 20,000 square feet of commercial use. Stadium Lands: The proposed Assessment District includes 4 parcels in the Stadium Lands SPA. The proposed land use includes 167 residential units and approximately 250,000 square feet of commercial land uses. Sonoma Mountain Village: The owners of this property have petitioned the council to include 2 parcels in the Assessment District. They have requested an assessment equivalent to 1007 residential units and approximately 80,000 square feet of commercial land uses. The assessment does not constitute a land use approval. Apportionment Formula The apportionment formula for each parcel in this Assessment District can be expressed mathematically as: Cost per CUF = Total Assessment District Project Cost /Total CUF in Assessment District Assessment per Parcel = CUFs on Parcel x Cost per CUF Appendix I illustrates the application of this assessment formula to the parcels in the proposed Assessment District. BOUNDARY MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Both the Boundary Map and the Assessment Diagram are on file with the City Clerk. Reference is hereby made to the maps of record in the office of the Assessor of the County of Sonoma for a detailed description of the lines and dimension of any Parcels shown herein, which maps shall govern for all details concerning the lines and dimensions of such Parcels. Reduced copies of the Boundary Map and Assessment Diagram are included on the following pages for reference. 02056- 05003 6 June 14, 2005 City of Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main .Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report ASSESSMENT ROLL AND NAMES & ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS Appendix 1 contains a list of the names and addresses of all property owners within the Assessment District as well as the assessment proposed to be levied on each property. The list is indexed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers of the County of Sonoma, as well as the Assessment Diagram Number for this Assessment District. Reference is made to the records of the Assessor of Sonoma County for a complete description of the boundaries of each property. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Reference is hereby made to the Plans and Specifications in and for said assessment proceedings on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rohnert Park, said Plans and Specifications being too bulky to be bound with this Engineer's Report. MAXIMUM ANNUAL. ASSESSMENT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS & EXPENSES In accordance with Section 8682.1 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City may collect an amount equal to its costs associated with administering the Assessment District. This cost will be spread to each parcel in the Assessment District on a pro -rata basis. This cost is set at $10,000 for the Assessment District and may be adjusted annually by the corresponding percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area. This cost shall be apportioned to the parcels in their current configuration on a per acre basis. At the time of approval of final subdivision maps, these costs should be apportioned to each new parcel on an equal basis. Public parcels (such as roadways, landscape easements, parks, open spaces and structural buffers) should be exempt from this assessment. Reapportionment of these costs should be conducted in a manner that allows for uniform cost allocation across all future lots. 02056 -05003 9 June 14, 2005 City of Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -01 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report CERTIFICATES 1. I, the City Clerk of the City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, State of California, hereby certify that the Assessment and Assessment Roll in this Engineer's Report, in the amounts set forth in Columns (1) of each, with the Assessment Diagram attached, was filed with me on May 2005. Judy Hauff, City Clerk City of Rohnert Park. California 2. I, have prepared this Engineer's Report and do hereby certify that the amounts set forth in Column (2) under Summary Cost Estimate on Page 1 hereof entitled "Assessment ", and the individual amounts in Column (2) of the Assessment Roll herein, have been computed by me in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, State of California, adopted on May _ 2005. Mary Grace Pawson P.E. Winzler & Kelly Consulting Engineers Engineer of Work 3. I, the City Clerk of the City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, State of California, hereby certify that the Assessment in this Engineer's Report, in the amounts set forth in Column (2) was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, State of California on May , 2005, by Resolution No. Judy Hauff, City Clerk City of Rohnert Park, California 02056 -05003 10 June 14, 2005 City of Rohnert Park Assessment District 05 -0.1 (Sewer Force Main Project No. 2003 -11) Final Engineer's Report 4. I, the Superintendent of Streets of the City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, State of California, hereby certify that the Assessment in this Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was recorded in my office on May , 2005. Superintendent of Streets City of Rohnert Park, California 5. A Notice of Assessment was recorded and the Assessment Diagram was filed in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Sonoma, State of California, on April , 2005. County Recorder County of Sonoma, California 02056 -05003 11 June 14, 2005 Appendix 1 Table 3 -17 Utilities Improvements Sewer Trunk Line Mitigation Fee Calculation Total Cost: $ 16,800,000 Cost per CUF $263.49(1) Land Use Units C2) Total Common Use Factors Percent Share Cost Share Cost Per Laud' use 3 Existinq New Total Existing New I Total I Existing New Existing New New Single Family Residential units 7,764 1,956 9,720 3.20 24,845 6,2591 31,104 38.97% 9.82% $ 6,546,235 $ 1,649,206 $ 843 Multi-Family Residential units 8,213 2,761 10,9741 2.00 16,426 5,522 21,948 25.76% 8.66% $ 4,328,006 $ 1,454,892 $ 527 Senior Housing units 207 61 268 2.00 414 122 536 0.65% 0.19% $ 109,083 $ 32,219 $ 527 Assisted Living units 0 135 135 1.00 0 135 135 0.00% 0.21% $ - $ 35,571 $ 263 General Office thousandsquare feet: 1,018 501 1.519 0.33 335 165 499 0.52% 0.26% $ 88,145 $ 43,407 $ 87 Hotel /Motel thousandsquare feet 458 124 581 1.05 482 130 613 0.76% 0.20% $ 127,067 $ 34,376 $ 278 Strip Retail thousandsquare feet 507 94 601 1.84 9321 174 1,106 1.46% 0.27% $ 245,615 $ 45,756 $ 485 Shopping Center /Retail thousandsquare feet) 1,459 1,234 2,692 1.80 2,6251 2,220 4,846 4.12% 3.48% $ 691,764 $ 585,066 $ 474 Light Industrial thousandsquare feet 1,638 1,324 2,9631 0.66 1.077 871 1,948 1.69% 137% $ 283,845 $ 229,394 $ 173 Heavy Industrial thousandsquare feet' 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% $ - $ - $ 173 Warehouse thousandsquare feet] 1,490 71 1,561 0.66 979 47 1,026 1.54% 0.07% $ 258,060 $ 12,302 $ 173 Education students 2,0001 755 2,755 0.00 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% $ - $ - $ - Park /Recreation (acres) Agricultural /Rural (acres) 1871 86 273 0.00 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% $ $ - $ 4281 0 428 0.00 1 01 0 0.00% 0.00% $ $ - $ Total 1 1 48,11 15,64 63,761 75.46 0/0 24.54%1 $ 12,677 820 $ 4,122,189 Notes: (1) Cost per Common Use Factor is Total Cost/Total Common Use Factor: (2) Common Use Factor is people /land use uni (3) Cost per Land Use Unit is Cost per Commoon Use Factor x Common Use Factor for the Land Us Rohnert Park Finance Plan \Cost Allocations \Budget and Assessment Roll 6 -9 -05 \Cost Allocations from PFFP 6/20/2005 Assessment Roll Assessment District 05-01 (Sewer force Main Project No. 20034 1) Assmt No. APN Acreage Land Use Units CUF Total CUF Assessment Owner Address city State Zip SPA 1 45073001 39,00 MFR 495.00 2.00 990.00 $400,553.04 Redwood Equities Investments P.O. Box 14955 Santa Rosa CA 95402 -6955 Northwest Plan Area 3.03 Industrial 26.12 04575 17.17 $6,948.17 2 45073002 2.48 Industrial 21.38 0.6575 14.06 $5,686.95 Redwood Equities Investments P.O. Box 14955 Santa Rosa CA 95402 -6955 Northwest Plan Area 3 45073003 1.04 Industrial 8.96 0.6575 5.89 $2,384.85 Hunter Dennis R P.O. Box 9069 Santa Rosa CA 95405 Northwest Plan Area 4 45073004 2.48 industrial 21.37 0.6575 14.05 $5,683.85 Redwood Equities Investments P.O. Box 14955 Santa Rosa CA 95402 -6955 Northwest Plan Area 5 45074009 25.24 Commercial 400.83 1.80 721.49 $291,914.11 Redwood Equities Investments P.O. Box 14955 Santa Rosa CA 95402 -6955 Northwest Plan Area 6 45074010 5,93 Commercial 94.17 1.80 169.51 $68,583,62 Redwood Equities Investments P.O. Box 14955 Santa Rosa CA 95402 -6955 Northwest Plan Area 7 45222002 10 SFR(LDR) 57.00 3.20 18240 $73,798.86 Bendetac Albert A & Cynthia Beilig TR 161 Esmeyer Dr. San Rafael CA 94903 -3770 Northeast Plan Area 8 45222004 20 SFR (RER) 43.00 3.20 137.60 $55,672.83 Hall Keith TR 11775 Wilshire Blvd. Ste, 1840 Los Angeles CA 90025 Northeast Plan Area 9 45222005 10 SFR (LLR) 38.00 3.20 121.60 $49,199.24 Sammons John T 710 W. Cotat Ave. Cotati CA 94931.5102 Northeast Plan Area 10 45222006 10 SFR(LDR) 60.00 3.20 19200 $77,683.01 Eastern Development Corporation 99 Somerset Ln. Atherton CA 94027 -5432 Northeast Plan Area 11 45222007 20 SFR(LDR) 61.00 320 195.20 $78,977.73 Selvage John R TR & Selvage Leslie A TR 1910 McClaskey Ave. Eureka CA 95501 Northeast Plan Area MFR 0.00 2.00 0.00 $0.00 12 45222011 8 SFR 78.00 3.20 249.60 $100,967.92 Pols Ada Marie 7900 Shenadoah Ln. Someset CA 95684 Northeast Plan Area 13 45222013 10 SFR(LDR) 53.00 3.20 169.60 $68,620.00 Dhesi Kuklip & Surnder ET AL 1219 Hemp Ct. Rohnert Park CA 94928 -1538 Northeast Plan Area 14 45222014 20.4 SFR (RER) 54.00 3.20 172.80 $69,914.71 Selvage John R TR & Selvage Leslie A TR 1910 McClaskey Ave. Eureka CA 95501 Northeast Plan Area 15 45222021 5.09 SFR LLR 19.00 3.20 60.80 $24,590,62 Tatman BGR LLC 979 Goff Course Dr. Rohnert Park CA 94928 Northeast Plan Area 16 45262001 19.75 * SFR 125.00 3.20 400.00 $161,839.61 North Bay Title Co. cto Quaker "if Development Corp. P.O, Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 -2240 University District 17 45282002 19.77 SFR 46.00 3.20 14720 $59,556.98 North Bay Title Co, clo Quaker Hill Development Corp. P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 -2240 University District 18 45262003 $0.32 SFR 70.00 320 224.00 $90,630.18 North Bay Title Co. cto Quaker Hill Development Corp. P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 -2240 University District 19 45262004 9.79 Open Space 0.00 3.20 0.00 $0.00 Vast Oak Properties clo Craig Harrington P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 University District 20 47111030 79.69 SFR 463.00 3.20 1481.60 $599,453.92 Carinalli Clement C & Ann Marie 3990 Wallace Road Santa Rosa CA 95404 Southeast Plan Area MFR 36.00 200 72.00 $29,131.13 Strip Retail 20.00 1.84 36.80 $14,889.24 21 47131019 44.95 * SFR 144.00 310 460.80 $186,439.23 Vast Oak Properties clo Craig Harrington P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95446 University District MFR 79.00 2.00 158.00 $63,926.65 22 47131024 29.84 * SFR 58.00 3.20 185.60 $75,093.58 North Bay Title Co. clo Quaker Hill Development Corp. P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 -2240 University District MFR 143.00 2.00 286.00 $115,715.32 Commercial 40.00 1.80 71.99 $29,128.16 23 47131025 89.99 * SFR 136.00 3.20 435.20 $176,081.50 North Bay Title Co. cto Quaker Hill Development Corp. P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 -2240 University District MFR 354.00 2.00 708.00 $286,456.11 Commercial 210.00 1.80 378.00 $152,938.43 24 47131026 27.64 SFR 92.00 3,20 294.40 $119,113.95 University District LLC WOLagonda Way Ste. 100 Danville CA 94526 University District MFR 154.00 2.00 308.00 $124,616.50 25 47131027 6.7 * SFR 18.00 3.20 57.60 $23,304.90 University District LLC 5001-agonda Way Ste. 100 Danville CA 94526 University District 26 143040110 14.81 Retail 258.05 1.80 464.44 $187,912.82 City of Rohnert Park 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park CA 94928 -2411 Stadium Lands MFR 167.00 200 334.00 $135136.08 27 46051039 98.36 * SFR 80.00 3.20 256.00 $103,577.35 Pine Creek Properties & Codding Enterprises 6400 Redwood Drive Santa Rosa CA 94928 Sonoma Mountain Village MFR 423.00 2.00 846.00 $342,290.78 Commercial 80.00 1.80 144.00 $58,262.26 28 46051040 76.93 * SFR 81.00 3.20 259.20 $104,872.07 Pine Creek Properties & Codding Enterprises 6400 Redwood Drive Santa Rosa CA 94928 Sonoma Mountain Village MFR 423.00 2.00 846.00 $342,290.78 Total CUF In AD 12268.60 $4,963,865.68 Note: * Acreage information has been provided by the Developers Engineer. Common Use Factor Table Land Use Class Unit CUF /Unit Single Family Residential EA 3.2000 Multi - Family Residential EA 2.0000 General Office 1 000s 0.3287 Hotel /Motel 1 000s 1.0539 Strip Retail 1 000s 1.8388 Shopping Center Retail 1 000s 1.7998 Industrial /Warehousing 1 000s 0.6575 Summary Cost Estimate (1) (2) (3) As Preliminarily Approved As Confirmed and Recorded As Modified After Recorded Construction Costs $16,800,000.00 $16,800,000.00 Incidental Expenses $1,443,405.25 $1,731,276.11 Total Costs $18,243,405.25 $18,531,276.11 Estimate Contributions $14,138,860.73 $13,567,410.43 Balance to Assessment $4,104,544.52 $4,963,865.68 Item Quantity Unit As Preliminarily Approved Unit Cost Subtotals As Confirmed & Recorded Unit Cost Subtotals As Changed & Modified Unit Cost Subtotals Construction Costs New Sewer Interceptor /Outfall Construction (1) 1 LS $9,100,000 Design & Management (2 ) 1 LS $1,800,000 Pump Station and Interceptor /Outfall Rehabilitation Construction (2) 1 LS $5,100,000 Design & Management (2 ) 1 LS $800,000 Subtotal Construction Costs $16,800,000 Contribution for General Benefits $13,567,410 Subtotal To Assessment $3,232,590 $3,232,590 Financing Costs Capitalized Interest (3 years @ 6.5 %) 1 LS $967,954 Bond Reserve (10 %) 1 LS $496,387 Bond Discount (2 %) 1 LS $99,277 City Administration (1 %) 1 LS $49,639 Bond Counsel 1 LS $59,639 Disclosure Counsel 1 LS $25,000 Assessment Engineering 1 LS $10,000 Bond Printing 1 LS $15,000 Fiscal Agent 1 LS $5,000 Incidental Contingency 1 LS $3,381 Subtotal Financing Costs $1,731,276 Balance to Assessment $4,963,866 $4,963,866 (1) 90% Estimate for Rohnert Park Sewer Interceptor Outfall Project, Winzler & Kelly, F ebruary 2OUb (2) Final Preliminary Design Report, Winzler & Kelly, August 2004 SCALE 1" = 1200' � ® � � aMtilit t /Ittnu� /f`a ,wwi p \\ \ \p0\\ � �p�' �� - .. .. � � :• \�ixiliii i iiimu. @�iii� ii i °iiii� - - - - - -. .��.� � ` ♦♦ ♦� �i. \ \ \\ - -_ =_ / i IIInIInI111111h. \ %IWIIUlIii41 flji agar � o0 0♦ � -� .,♦ \t111t ��. �� s� ®f� \ �. ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦'♦ � �`1'`•r`1G al., == is � � /Illy: +�'� tttt� , o♦♦ ♦. ` ♦Iet11/ ia{��` aaaaao� � �`•'o' %'a'• III % %aiw I /IIIIIIIIII . ♦O,o ,•1 f /11/: •• ►Qt4'l \tl19: JC'.� ! ., ```' /�.•`,�,. � /\ � � 1 • / 1 _ 1 ♦ ee ► 11•. lual „� ?','.1 a. �: tll m IMI . • 1• 10 ♦♦ ,♦ ea••,f .'l"aymo n,P�PP,o •i ! . �O ■w.■11I1� ��1 ! \� aae ,J,O ,•{111 �-?nmre/ _ Ilia , i• • 1 • 11. � � � t � _� •••♦Oiiae aeaetlr�S . =1= °_ _� _ rl :,:. 9''•• � i1'r•�.. __ � '• ' " nnn nnnnuun �• • • 1 1 1 �� - ,� ■, LIN • '��,�� s n, *ql.0 ?uininll q�u�i lint iluo��_ ee .,9111nnanninnnl 1 • / 1 .; ' 1 • . t • • � � er n W ♦`a iii w•a. •. �/ 1• 1 i .. MAN ♦ .. ` •. r s 1• t ♦/ ■� �� rj °•wi �j{j�� i�w rib ita {•� ME � � ® �. is f ♦ ♦Ie ♦ � cd r .a1 \w 1 / 11 IS ww.j ♦•,I♦ ♦ ww�♦ Rj• �t III�,r •t�Q � �i.� .t�9.11 1 : � = flltllll ■ •i ,+ . i� I � , � f if wf �� • /I� is I /�.�1Unt nllitt -., i.�.�� , eeel��, ww.www \��►N�� o � 1111 1111 r ►� :� t Sp��r +�A� is •.i A-4 1 • 11 '1• IAIa�1 • ?wY ..v <'�'!r■�:ii_I . � � �••��f;•��,�� : /,_ t ♦'�'�f• w :: .r = t:'�!�e - `�ul�s•. Ii�Aamn n w u��i.n 1 • 1 `�r� •eI, did�� - Z' ► - _ -11 i� I INIIi l n •�•�. •'`�I��I �� 1'e�i /llt��i,, ♦': %I�linii .ea ':2 LOCATION NOT TO LE ♦�•0® �� : � ".pa�`a� `sai � c�•Ilnur �1 = S , , 5;• .� �� C. a `,,� °� ♦, ♦,♦ \ \, ♦,,• ♦,.aaaaaPaaa� ••ir�rpil,••ii1 ♦ ::>t 1 Ra a ♦. �i� OQ �e ,aa a��i��•I •i .,♦ nntmnum 1 nn■ R ►�`a�� •i ° �`O O O` \ \ \i�i9�i ••• p ae •v. •i. ♦i J/1 111 �C FILED IN THE OFFICE OF OF t.�� • nnnnetili u■. mp` ee�,•,p,. ♦O a \e�.i�...� ••• �. ►i, �iv1 xn.• rn ai • ' e 1 Illll•Itllnttit■ �nsae�.,♦,,,'♦ �jw��w'f,�� ••�• ♦�••,e♦ 4t - •11.. ■ I= Rxp -% n • OF ROHNERT PARK THIS DAY .. • c•nnnnnum■ ,•:.f 1. ♦♦♦ p .. �iG �i�iG •� .w„ •� �• ►qC ;: p� • 2005. ' •�♦ ®S�� S i 1R1/t 1t IRtRne p::IJJ CJ ♦. ♦. �::S +a 4C�`:•i 9.••,at �C �� ..:�i... - � ►• _ _ - 1• nupnnnl Inn • ... o♦ ♦ w . • • .N •. . _ �• a /ttnrla RRII•e• •••a. �•`�•�. ✓•,ice° aa•� ••••iae`i, :9 °; a:.i 1:� �► nn� .,�'1�. ` � _• wn einuRe�7 aa•O,o� , aa`..aja•� S +•••;.•• •.94 -' � Z� Gr � ir'+'1► f JUDY HAUFF, CITY CLERK CITY OF ROHNERT PARK � n r�q 1 un luau• � ��O .� aaGa`. •I •d` .aaia49•• � �� tl: La.. ■ nEu n . O .•.`9 O9a` •• 9a••.••a .�. ..•'W�i�. aI' a •9• G•io•iQ O• �aa F . ILi A �i�IRlI �t w 9w • .. w a • ♦ a •b . 1� a 1. � � A� wyq�i�w��99 V1 • ♦� VD` � 4� �' � ee - see: a• , let � . O • � ♦ 99 a• �• ,p! �V �_ �Es::Sp �, �,. � •� �•i•Oi •. 9 • ? .aaa � / :�• ♦ • _- ICS �IN�11 2, 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE MAP SHO\AANG �,��•'v`I►•9 \fiDyiwvs •�° i •t e c ia`aaa� i 1� -- - m_e a: = %iR► �. . `i �. ��,• ♦'1�■��i�wi�.�0 ♦v�� / Oj III • @;• P �i� i %� I @ @� II ` fp1 • 1 ` ` • ��,• ♦� A��'a. � .. er: �,� ,•. . \�Y ��a • ,.., . . �a f.� ..• �� .. •� E . •\ ; �.! C • .� • . ♦ p i �. oJ , •�4 J j-�o io Ji °t• IjpfN'-j 11 t I l .t ,nZ u • = �tp1 j I •�'t , � t v itpI,t/♦ p i ,••v •i •♦♦ ie p °♦►eIh` pa, • , ' �J f'C� ., I� i� ►■ A • w ♦ ` • • . � �♦• ♦aa� s a a� ai , a• \`� Y � di� �d ♦�� \ N p � - s• d.. ixesIlInne1ll� �l ai � M i_ina rau i Itl e • _m: i l 9` = - - e m m_ e 's n ' 1n I1 . � 1 ' O i'1 l l�1I�1IH� �■ �� It I �' ■ r ■ • 1 • • e BOUNDARIES • a -WER • • CE MAIN PROJECT NO. ./ OF - • PARK. • OF • • APPROVED e BY • • • -. PARK AT A THEREOF. • ON d •vim � =` , •;•C'r, .: ooal� h d ♦��V �� G'` . � • ' � I ile fltnnlfl w. ■ t■ DAY OF / e 5 BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. �,e`� ♦, .- .�` n � Jim �� aN 0 \� 4Zj•L� 0,. ` `� ali I _ inlRi �1� T� w � t Q • as �f � i.. 4D - 0 1 as nnn111t11�� ' l�• � • �:'re..••K• /.r.t ♦aa• �• ��s •� �= t1 nx e(�. Ru r;'i p� . � II �� .•d►�,a{ d�i '; n•`. G ��/ *►` ♦ � a.♦` i '�t d. pt a 1 euul ■ NINON• �, � ,,,; , ' °.,r�.• �,,.,� • ,,a..,,a9 ; �.,, • uwr i� 1 i tR 11 :�11'1�111 �� . ♦ il�...� �` ,`0 r °, a�N'. G ..r� a♦ 1 minnmur i ■ ■ ■ l♦ty / �/ ♦ G `� ; ♦aa •.� x.•;'::19 -- ellnnl a '�', � ��; 177 � � ` •,, . ♦a`OA�;I,, / //1 � � � • •,�� s Inxn O C I e1 '- �� ° • • s try � ItIII► ., . . .,: : yS�.a r p .. P w.' A .• s8 - �� ,1� � ! •I / /Ih � ! l% ♦♦y ie ♦♦j� Y� �, `® ♦ � .?y�.�i, a °D .• •- . o•: \:o anllln c • unaij n ,� .� .,,��w9iA• 1��,;._.r,'' °r,., per.. •� • ♦ •.��♦►�p ►•gyp .rpo,. Imn-s - 'v/1nZ a I i . /i. �/ S �, ( // 'i .. Op . • �• O •� N• r� Q en -is 1 I A .► 1 \ �I Ir �� ., .,., 7., O O6 9 ..�.� •a pa Pp • • �� 1 a • • 11 II SIN \ �i f.'i i • 9• eb L� 9a • • • • : • • • . rp �..` • ... �•i% �,♦�� t� � .• i � to � Mw SL i ••1 • • • • • • ♦ ♦' � • `•,' . c �!.� @ /ice• ml %y al fl i S :�1 I i ♦ �`O' vow• ■• -` � f/N w nffltfl lflfl► i• a • h �� ••lli � ♦� ♦ i �Q � iii at a1 • �i • • • • • ,� /. ♦ ♦ o�i, O ♦� �'y .tea u`$ • • • . . !� ♦ �� `• VALLEY HOUSE DR •• • • // 046-051-014 • -. •1 . . 1 e i Assmt. No. APN Acreage Land Use Units CUF Total CUF Assessment Total Assmt. For APN Assmt. For Merge Owner Address City State Zip SPA 1 45073001 39.00 MFR 495.00 2.00 990.00 $400,553.04 $407,501.21 $407,501.21 Redwood Equities Investments P.O. Box 14955 Santa Rosa CA 95402 -6955 Northwest Plan Area 3.03 Industrial 26.12 0.6575 17.17 $6,948.17 2 45073002 2.48 Industrial 21.38 0.6575 14.06 $5,686.95 $5,686.95 $5,686.95 Redwood Equities Investments P.O. Box 14955 Santa Rosa CA 95402 -6955 Northwest Plan Area 3 45073003 1.04 Industrial 8.96 0.6575 5.89 $2,384.85 $2,384.85 $2,384.85 Hunter Dennis R P.O. Box 9069 Santa Rosa CA 95405 Northwest Plan Area 4 45073004 2.48 Industrial 21.37 0.6575 14.05 $5,683.65 $5,683.65 $5,683.65 Redwood Equities Investments P.O. Box 14955 Santa Rosa CA 95402 -6955 Northwest Plan Area 5 45074009 25.24 Commercial 400.83 1.80 721.49 $291,914.11 $291,914.11 $291,914.11 Redwood Equities Investments P.O. Box 14955 Santa Rosa CA 95402 -6955 Northwest Plan Area 6 45074010 5.93 Commercial 94.17 1.80 169.51 $68,583.62 $68,583.62 $68,583.62 Redwood Equities Investments P.O. Box 14955 Santa Rosa CA 95402 -6955 Northwest Plan Area 7 45222002 10 SFR(LDR) 57.00 3.20 182.40 $73,798.86 $73,798.86 $73,798.86 Bendelac Albert A & Cynthia Beilig TR 161 Esmeyer Dr. San Rafael CA 94903 -3770 Northeast Plan Area 8 45222004 20 SFR (RER) 43.00 3.20 137.60 $55,672.83 $55,672.83 $55,672.83 Hall Keith TR 11775 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 1840 Los Angeles CA 90025 Northeast Plan Area 9 45222005 10 SFR (LLR) 38.00 3.20 121.60 $49,199.24 $49,199.24 $49,199.24 Sammons John T 710 W. Cotati Ave. Cotati CA 94931 -5102 Northeast Plan Area 10 45222006 10 SFR(LDR) 60.00 3.20 192.00 $77,683.01 $77,683.01 $77,683.01 Eastern Development Corporation 99 Somerset Ln. Atherton CA 94027 -5432 Northeast Plan Area 11 45222007 20 SFR(LDR) 61.00 3.20 195.20 $78,977.73 $78,977.73 $78,977.73 Selvage John R TR & Selvage Leslie A TR 1910 McClaskey Ave. Eureka CA 95501 Northeast Plan Area MFR 0.00 2.00 0.00 $0.00 12 45222011 8 SFR 78.00 3.20 249.60 $100,987.92 $100,987.92 $100,987.92 Pols Ada Marie 7900 Shenadoah Ln. Someset CA 95684 Northeast Plan Area 13 45222013 10 SFR(LDR) 53.00 3.20 169.60 $68,620.00 $68,620.00 $68,620.00 Dhesi Kuldip & Surinder ET AL 1219 Hemp Ct. Rohnert Park CA 94928 -1538 Northeast Plan Area 14 45222014 20.4 SFR (RER) 54.00 3.20 172.80 $69,914.71 $69,914.71 $69,914.71 Selvage John R TR & Selvage Leslie A TR 1910 McClaskey Ave. Eureka CA 95501 Northeast Plan Area 15 45222021 5.09 SFR LLR 19.00 3.20 60.80 $24,599.62 $24,599.62 $24,599.62 Tatman BGR LLC 979 Golf Course Dr. Rohnert Park CA 94928 Northeast Plan Area 16 45262001 19.75 SFR 125.00 3.20 400.00 $161,839.61 $161,839.61 $161,839.61 North Bay Title Co. c/o Quaker Hill Development Corp. P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 -2240 University District 17 45262002 19.77 SFR 46.00 3.20 147.20 $59,556.98 $59,556.98 $59,556.98 North Bay Title Co. c/o Quaker Hill Development Corp. P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 -2240 University District 18 45262003 30.32 SFR 70.00 3.20 224.00 $90,630.18 $90,630.18 $90,630.18 North Bay Title Co. c/o Quaker Hill Development Corp. P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 -2240 University District 19 45262004 9.79 Open Space 0.00 3.20 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Vast Oak Properties c/o Craig Harrington P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 University District 20 47111030 79.69 SFR 463.00 3.20 1481.60 $599,453.92 $643,474.30 $643,474.30 Carinalli Clement C & Ann Marie 3990 Wallace Road Santa Rosa CA 95404 Southeast Plan Area MFR 36.00 2.00 72.00 $29,131.13 Strip Retail 20.00 1.84 36.80 $14,889.24 21 47131019 44.95 SFR 144.00 3.20 460.80 $186,439.23 $250,365.88 $250,365.88 Vast Oak Properties c/o Craig Harrington P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 University District MFR 79.00 2.00 158.00 $63,926.65 22 47131024 29.84 ' SFR 58.00 3.20 185.60 $75,093.58 $219,937.06 $219,937.06 North Bay Title Co. c/o Quaker Hill Development Corp. P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 -2240 University District MFR 143.00 2.00 286.00 $115,715.32 Commercial 40.00 1.80 71.99 $29,128.16 23 47131025 69.99 ` SFR 136.00 3.20 435.20 $176,081.50 $615,476.05 $615,476.05 North Bay Title Co. c/o Quaker Hill Development Corp. P.O. Box 2240 Healdsburg CA 95448 -2240 University District MFR 354.00 2.00 708.00 $286,456.11 Commercial 210.00 1.80 378.00 $152,938.43 24 47131026 27.64 SFR 92.00 3.20 294.40 $119,113.95 $243,730.46 $243,730.46 University District LLC 5001-agonda Way Ste. 100 Danville CA 94526 University District MFR 154.00 2.00 308.00 $124,616.50 25 47131027 6.7 * SFR 18.00 3.20 57.60 $23,304.90 $23,304.90 $23,304.90 University District LLC 5001-agonda Way Ste. 100 Danville CA 94526 University District 26 143040110 14.81 Retail 258.05 1.80 464.44 $187,912.62 $323,048.70 $323,048.70 City of Rohnert Park 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park CA 94928 -2411 Stadium Lands MFR 167.00 2.00 334.00 $135,136.08 27 46051039 98.36 ' SFR 80.00 3.20 256.00 $103,577.35 $504,130.39 $504,130.39 Pine Creek Properties & Codding Enterprises 6400 Redwood Drive Santa Rosa CA 94928 Agilent Area MFR 423.00 2.00 846.00 $342,290.78 Commercial 80.00 1.80 144.00 $58,262.26 28 46051040 76.93 ` SFR 81.00 3.20 259.20 $104,872.07 $447,162.85 $447,162.85 Pine Creek Properties & Codding Enterprises 6400 Redwood Drive Santa Rosa CA 94928 Agilent Area MFR 423.00 2.00 846.00 $342,290.78 Total CUF in AD 12268.60 $4,963,865.68 $4,963,865.67 $4,963,865.67 Note: ' Acreage information has been provided by the Developer's Engineer.