Loading...
1977/01/24 City Council MinutesROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL MINUTES January 24, 1977 The Council of the City of`Rohnert Park met this date in regular session commencing at 7:10 p.m. in the City Offices, 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, with Mayor Flores :presiding. The regular session was preceded by an executive' session and at which all Councilmen and City Manager Callinan were present and which was held to discuss litigation and personnel matt6rs. Call to Order Mayor Flores called the meeting of the regular session to order at approximately 7:10 p.m and. led the pledge of allegiance. Roll Call Present: (5) Councilmen Beary, Eck, Hopkins, Roberts and Flores Absent: (0) None Staff present for all or part of the meeting: City Manager, Callinan, City Attorney Flitner, Planning Director Skanchy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brust, Fire Services Commander Bick, Parks and Recreation Director Pekkain, and Student Intern Zimmerman Approval of Minutes Upon motion of Councilman Eck, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved9 with Mayor Flores abstaining, the minutes of January 10, 1977were approved. Approval of Bills Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Eck, and unanimously approved, the bills presented per the attached list in the amount of $796,251.53 were approved. Communications Communications per the attached outline were brought to the attention of the Council. No action was taken'on any communication except I as noted specifically in these minutes. Commerce Blvd'. Councilman Eck initiated a'discussi6n concerning a letter Widening, Bicycle received from the State Department of Transportation con- Path cerning its not participating.in funding the Commerce Boule- vard widening project if a two-way bikeway is installed. Discussion followed during which City Manager Callinan advised that the Dept. of Transportation was re-evaluating its position. National League Mayor Flores referred to a letter from the National League of `Cities of Cities concerning its membership criteria, dues for the coming year, and recommended that the City's membership becontinu'ed. Adding Non-Agend . aed There were no requests to consider non-agendaed items, Items except Councilman Beary to report on the Youth Advisory Commission under Matters from Councilmen. Unscheduled Public There was no person in the audience desiring to address Appearances the City Council. Sting Ray Swim Team - F inaoricaal Report Ordinance No. 321 Ordinance No. 322 Resolution No. 77-08 Page 2 January 24, 1977 Mayor Flores questioned if a representative of the Sting .1 Ray Swim Team was present. There being no response the matter was continued to th.ez February IU+'h MaO+;-n& AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 58 (Mechanical Play Devices) City Manager Callinan explained the ordinance. Upon motion of Councilman Beary, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, reading of Ordinance No. 321 was waived and said ordinance was adopted. AYES: (5)Councilmen Beary., Eck, Hopkins, Roberts, and Flores NOES: (0)None AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF.ROHNERT PARK AMENDING g'1 OF ORDINANCE 307 (1976),AS IT AMENDED 9 1 OF ORDINANCE 190 (1971) AS AMENDED ALSO KNOWN AS SECTION 15.40.020 OF CHAPTER 15 OF THE ROHNERT PARK MUNICIPAL CODE (Construction Fees) City Manager Callinan explained the ordinance. Upon motion of Councilman Eck, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, reading of Ordinance No. 322 was waived and said ordinance was adopted. AYES: (5)Councilmen Beary, Eck, Hopkins, Roberts, and Flores NOES: (0) None A RESOLUTION OUTLINING POLICY CONCERNING USE OF FEES DEPOSITED IN CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND City Manager Callinan reviewed his memo to the City Council, dated January 20th, concerning subject resolution. Upon motion of Councilman Eck, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, reading of Resolution No. 77-08 was waived and said resolution was adopted. Resolution No. 77-09 A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT, SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AT NO NAME STREET SIGNALS, Project No. 1976-18 City.Manager Callinan reviewed his memo to the City Council, dated January 20th, and bid results. Discussion followed with City Engineer Brust participating. Upon motion of Councilman Beary, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, reading of Resolution No. 77-09 was waived and said resolution was adopted. Pagc 3 January 24, 1977 Growth Policy City Manager Callinan reminded that the City Council had considered the proposed growth program at its January 5th meeting, informed that the Planning Commission had endorsed the policy with special considerations; reviewed his memo to the.City Council, dated January 20th, and informed that notices of public hearing had been published in the Santa Rosa Press Democrat and Rohnert Park - Cotati Clarion as well as various news releases sent to press correspondents re. same Mayor Flores declared the public hearing open concerning a °proposed resolution entitled "Resolution Con cerning Growth of the City of Rohnert Park and Enacting a Program for Coping With It ". - Mayor Flores outlined the format for conducting the public hearing.. City Manager Callinan reviewed his memo to the City Council, dated December 9, 1976, and briefly outlined some of the major points contained in the proposed resolution concerning growth. City Attorney Flitner commented on possible conflict of interest and opioned that, in general, any councilman could - _,vote upon the proposed resolution. Mr. John E. Taylor, 8345 Liberty Avenue, was recognized and questioned City Manager Callinan why multiple family dwellings with not more than two bedrooms and units proposed for,only the aged, handicapped, or low income were excluded from consideration in the determination of the yearly total of residential units. Councilman Eck explained to`Mr.`Taylor that although the growth policy resolution had''been prepared by staff, ques- tions should be directed to the City Council, Mr. Taylor questioned why certain units were exempt from the. growth policy and how many people in the audience had read the proposed program." There was no response from any member of the audience. Mayor Flores, City Manager Callinan and Mr. Taylor partici- pated in a discussion concerning availability of the proposed resolution to interested parties, legal notice advising of the Council's public hearing and ,public response to same. Mr. Alfred Parkins, 8315 Liberty Avenue, was recognized and asked why one and two bedroom multiple family and mobile home units had been excluded from the growth policy especially since such apartments would generate children thereby affect- ing.the need for school facilities° Mayor Flores explained that the the amount of school aged children generated from a multiple family district was lower than normal. Page 4 January 24, 1977 City Manager Cal.linah commented on existing mobile home ,pads, reviewed a repor t entitled Survey of Residential r In -I +Q11 rlatarl .Tarn n-mr 1 1(177 ncz i+ -nal =+ac! to nnr, in=ne,1v in'adult - and family mobile:home parks. ,Mr. Joe -Kiof er:,. 'North rCounty Is District Counsel of Carpenters, wasrbcognized and advised that he represented the area's l-ocal carpenters..' Mr. Lawrence Blanc, 7284 Calcutta Court, was recognized and commented on the City's enactment of a school impact fee imposed on development and restricted school growth expressing that mobile homes and apartment dwellers need for services was at least As much as, if not more than, thAt of the single family homeowner® Mr. Whitmore representing the equipment operators union was recognized and informed that said organization would, with ,reluctancei:endorse the proposed growth policy, generally commented on persons advocating restricted growth, recommended that Rohnert Park not adopt a restricted growth policy and 'informed,t.hat-he may move to Rohnert Park in light of the present availability of water. Mr. Jim Campbell, representing Teamsters Local 980 of Rohnert Rohnert Park, was recognized and informed that although he didn't- care to see enactment of a growth policy, the program proposed wasi,one that could be lived with. Mr. Ray Springer, resident and representative of the Build- ing Trades-Counsel of Sonoma County, was recognized and informed that although members of the building trades defi- nitely objected to limiting growth, that the proposed resolu- tion would be acceptable, Mrs. Elaine Trowbridge, 6039 Elsa Avenue, was recognized and expressed her approval of the proposed growth policy and commented negatively on the exlusion of multi-family, rhohile home parks and low income housing from the limitation in the policy. Mr'Mike Gragg, 7408; Brenda Way, was recognized and generally ., expiessed that growth shouldn't be curtailed altogther, rather slowed down and opioned that the proposed resolution concerning growth should cover a wider variety of construction, Mr. Larry Smith, Executive Officer of the Associated Building i1fidustry, was recognized and recommended that the words Viand the problems associated with it" be stricken from page 5, item 4. Mr. Maurice Fredericks, 242 Alden Avenue, was recognized and,j after informing that he was addressing the Council as'a resident, generally reflected on Rohnert Park growth since its inception in 195.5 and recommended that the issue .be debated considerably. Page 5 January 24, 1977 City Manager Callinsn noted that a letter had been received from the School .Board of Trustees of the Cotati - Rohnert Park School District, dated January 24, 1977, requesting clarification concerning the growth policy. Mayor Flores noted that 800 of the recent school bond issues in California had been defeated. Discussion followed concern - ing same as related to growth.`, Mrs. Anna Cousterouse, 7333 Carioca Court, was recognized and, after informing that,s,he was addressing the Council as a resident, advised that' there was a misconception of the proposed growth.policy.`:in that it would alleviate the overcrowded conditions in the school classrooms. She pointed out.that there was no provision in the proposed policy relating to the enrollment pr.oblems;,experienced by the school district. There being no one further desiring to be heard, and no communications received except as specifically noted in these minutes, Mayor Flores declared the public hearing closed. Discussion followed during which each Councilman generally reflected and commented upon the proposed growth policy, including exempting specific types of _units from same, articulated /controlled growths time limitation of subject policy, over crowded condition of school facilities, type of units generating children, no growth restrictions, various industries affected by a growth policy in providing housing for individuals desiring same, and availability of school construction funds. Resolution No. 77 -10 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING GROWTH OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AN ENACTING A PROGRAM FOR COPING WITH IT Councilman Eck made a motion, which was seconded by Council- man Hopkins, to waive the reading of Resolution No. 77 -10 and adopt same. Discussion followed. Councilman Eck made a' motion, seconded by Councilman Roberts, that page 5, item 1 of Resolution No. 77 -10 concerning the Council's conducting meetings and hearings with major owners of residentially designated properties to determine the amount of residential units to be approved for any one construction year be amended to designate a committee consisting of the Council and two ex officio representatives from both the Cotati-Rohnert Park'School District and Petaluma High School District Board of Trustees. Discussion followed. Said motion failed by the following vote: AYES: (2) Councilmen Eck and Roberts NOES: (3) Councilmen Beary, Hopkins and Flores Page 6 January 24, 1977 Upon motion of Mayor Floras, seconded by Councilman Roberts, and approved by the followng roll call vote, page 5, item 1-of Resolution.NO< 77 -10 concerning the Council's conducting meetings and hearings with major owners of residentially designated properties to determine the amount of residential units to.be approved for any one construction year was arnendeci to provided that. the Cotati- Rohnert Park School District and Petaluma High 'School District Board of Trustees would be requested to send representatives) to provide input;. AYES ( "3),Councilmen Eck, Roberts and Flores NOES, (2) Councilmen Beary and Hopkins Upon motion of Councilman Eck, seconded by Councilman Hopkins --A ad approved by the following roll call vote, the words "of from 300" were stricken from page 6, item 3 of Resolution No. 77 -10. AYES : - (3) Councilmen Eck, Hopkins and Flores NOES: (2) Councilmen Deary and Roberts Councilman Eck made,a motion to add the following to page 6, item 3 of.Resoluton No. 77 -100 "In order to facilitate input from,the school districts, the Council will request information on school capacity from the Cotati- Rohnert Park and:Petaluma High School Districts, to aide the Com- mittee.in determining students for the coming year. This information will be presented prior to the meeting with the developers." Said motion died for lack of a second Councilman Eck made a motion to delete from page 6, item 4(b) of Resolution No. 77 -10, i.e. "multiple family units with not more than two (2) bedrooms per unit." Said motion died for Lack of a second. ,Councilman.Eck made a motion to change from "not more than two (2) bedrooms per unit" to "not more than one (1) bed - roomsper unit" as contained on page 6, item 4(b). Said motion died for lack of a second. Councilman Roberts made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, that the existing ' obile home units /pads (142, as. reported an the "Survey of Residential Units, January 1, 197711) may or may not be allowed to be occupied since they would be included in the proposed growth policy upon its enactment. Discussion followed with City Attorney Flitner participating. Page 7 January 24, 1977 Councilman Roberts and Hopkins withdrew their motion and second respectively and staff was directed to monitor occupancy of the.,family mobile home parks and to not allow more than the 'approved number of.units in which children are allowed. Councilman Roberts made a motion to ban future approval of tentative maps within the City. of Rohnert Park. Wired 0'A 0-V oxtev, . Said motion{ Discussion followed. Councilman Beary stated for the record that as a result of the growth policy homeowners are going to experience more rapid assessments, increases in taxes, renters are going to experience sharper increases in rent, home buyers are going to experience higher increases in home costs. Discussion followed. Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved by,a roll call vote, the words "and the problems associated with it" were stricken from Page 5, item 4, of Resolution No. 77 -10. AYES: (5) Councilmen Beary, Eck, Hopkins, Roberts and Flores NOES: (0) None The original motion made by Councilman Eck, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, to waive the reading of Resolution No. 77 -10 and adopt same, with amendments thereto, was approved by the following roll call vote. AYES: (4) Councilmen Eck, Hopkins, Roberts and Flores NOES: (1) Councilman Beary Recess Mayor Flores declared a recess at this point in the meeting the time being approximately 8:45 p.m. Reconvene Mayor Flores reconvened the meeting at approximately 8:55 p.m., with all Councilmen present. Joanne and Kirsten Mayor Flores announced that the "No All Night Parking" Courts, "No All signs posted on Joanne and Kirsten Courts would be considered Night Parking Signs" at this time. Mrs. Trimbley, 913 Kirsten Court, Apt. C, was recognized and, informing that she managed seven buildings, four apart - ments each, explained that she had conducted an independent survey to determine how many vehicles each of her tenants owned. Overall she found that there were 65 cars, 9 trucks, 10 motorcycles, 1, ,boat, 1. camper and 2 vans or a total of 85 vehicles..'Mrs. Trimbley explained the difficulty in providing parking for residents as well as guests in relationship to areas designated as "no parking" areas. Page 8 January 24, 1977 Mayor Flores explained the purpose of providing city services, i.e.,,street sweeping and refuse disposal. Mr. Albert Mahood, property owner of 907 and 909 Joanne Court, was recognized and informed that he was not aware upon purchasing the property that no parking would be en- forded on Joanne Court, expressed that no overnight parking was discriminatory, noted that most residents owned two vehicles,, and recommended that one day be set aside for street sweeping 'services. Joann Thurston, 910 Joanne Court, was recognized and explained that upon returning home late at night from work she felt safe parking on the street (Joanne Court) because it was patrolled and was well lighted. Susan Ro.manyk, 908`Joanne Court, Apt. A, was recognized and informed that her car had been vandalized while parked in the garage, therefore, she will not walk or park to the rear of the units at night. Mr. Larry Rolaf, 913 Kirsten Court, was recognized and advised that his car had been hit while parked in front of the apartments, that the suspect left the scene without notifying anyone, and that if it hadn't been for his neighbors witnessing the accident he wouldn't have known who was i responsib le. Mr. Courtney Williamson, 909 Joanne Court, was recognized and commented briefly on the provision of 1 1/2 parking spaces per unit in relationship to the number of vehicles owned by tenants, recommended that the present number of required parking spaces (2) per unit be increased, that one day be set aside for street sweeping, and opioned that Kirsten and Joanne'Courts should not be posted for no parking because single family districts are not restricted. Mr. Thurston, 910 Joanne Court, was recognized and informed that he had conducted an indpendent survey of parking and garage uses in the single-family district on Camino Coronado comparing it to that of Kirsten and Joanne Courts. He noted that homeowners in residential districts parked their driveways, wHch made a considerable difference as compared to that of a multiple family district. Mr. Thurston briefly described the uses of garages, storage areas and off/on street parking,, Discussion followed. ...:Upon motion of Councilman Flores seconded by Councilman Roberts, and unanimously ap p roved, the Council directed that the "No All Night Parking" signs on Kirsten and Joanne Courts be removed and that four hours one day a week be designated specifically for street sweeping purposes. Discus- sion followed. File No. 0491 - Henry L. Hicks, et al, Precise Development Plan and Architectural Review Page 9 January 24, 1977 Upon motion of Councilman Eck, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, the Council directed that a letter be sent, over the Mayor's signature, requesting property owners whose apartments are poorly lighted to the rear of the structure to instigate measures to alleviate same. Planning Director Skanchy informed of Henry Hicks, et al, application for precise development plan and architectural review of a 63 unit apartment complex and 13 lot single family development, described its location, surrounding zoning and development, site plan and renderings which were displayed, Planning Commission approval, and informed that copies of the Planning staff report had been disseminated to Council members. Discussion followed with City .Manager Callinan and Planning Director Skanchy participating concerning there being adequate, provision for parking within the development. Mayor Flores declared the public hearing open to consider Henry L. Hicks',, et al, precise development plan and 11 1 architectural review of a 63 unit apartment complex and 13 lot single family development located south of Copeland Creek, west of Northwestern Pacific Railraod tracks. Mr. Henry Hicks advised, upon questioning of Councilman Hopkins; that the proposed development would not be developed this year. Councilman Hopkins reiterated the purpose of approving only the =first 60 units of the original develop - ment, which is located on the north side of Copeland Creek. Discussion continued relative to the City's General Plan. There being no one further desiring to be heard, and no written communications received, Mayor Flores declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Hopkins made a motion to approve the precise development plan and grant architectural approval subject to the Council's review of -the first phase of development i.e. 60 units as approved by the City Council on December 13, 1976. Discussion followed.during which Councilman Hopkins withdrew his motion. Mr. Hicks generally reviewed some of the alterations made to the proposed development to comply with planning staff's recommendations and necessity;of receiving approval for the entire development, consisting.of two separate parcels of land, in order to obtain financing for same. Discussion followed. Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Beary, and approved by the following vote, Henry L. Hicks', et al precise development plan for a'63.unit apartment com- plex`Ana 13 lot single family residential development located Page, January 24, 1977 Mr, Jim Redding, 7147 Barhi Lane, was recognized and advised that he represented both the applicant and property owner in requesting that the Council consider reducing the 50' setback from Commerce Boulevard as approved by the Planning Commission. Mr. Redding cited that the California Skate structure had a lesser setback, compared the two structure's architecture, lot dimensions, and tentative map approval for industrial development in the area. There being no one further desiring to be heard, and no written communications reueived, Mayor Flores declared the public hearing closed. Discussion followed concerning landscaping and setback from Commerce Boulevard in relationship to the proposed structure. ' Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Roberts, and approved with Councilman Beary abstaining, precise development plan and architecture for a commercial/ professional warehouse building located east of Commerce Boulevard, north of the California Skate structure (A.P. No. 143-020-51) was approved subject to conditions recommended in the planning staff report and changing the required setback from 50 feet to 43 feet from Commerce Boulevard right-of-way. AYES: (4) Councilmen Eck, Hopkins, Roberts and Flores NOES: (0) None ABSTAI14: (1) Councilman Beary ,south,pf Copeland Creek, west of the Northwestern-Pacific railrg.ad tracks (A.P. No. 143.-060-50) was approved subject to conditions and further subject to the Council.withqlding architectural approval of.subject.-development pending construction ction of the first 60 units to.the north of Copeland Creek, as previously approved. AYES: (3) Councilmen Beary, Hopkins, and Flores "NOES: (2) Councilmen Eck and Roberts File No. 0508 Planning Director Skanchy informed of Pacific Coast Develop- Pacific Coast ment Corporation's application for precise development Development, plan and architectural review of a proposed commercial/ Precise Develop- professional warehouse building; described its location, ment Plan and surrounding development and zoning, S-LLt:-, plan and rendering Arch. Review which was displayed, landscaping, parking, setbacks, and recommended that subject application be approved subject to conditions. Mayor Flores declared the public hearing open to consider Pacific Coast Development Corporation's precise development plan and architectural review of a commercial/professional warehouse located east of Commerce Boulevard, north of California Skate, Mr, Jim Redding, 7147 Barhi Lane, was recognized and advised that he represented both the applicant and property owner in requesting that the Council consider reducing the 50' setback from Commerce Boulevard as approved by the Planning Commission. Mr. Redding cited that the California Skate structure had a lesser setback, compared the two structure's architecture, lot dimensions, and tentative map approval for industrial development in the area. There being no one further desiring to be heard, and no written communications reueived, Mayor Flores declared the public hearing closed. Discussion followed concerning landscaping and setback from Commerce Boulevard in relationship to the proposed structure. ' Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Roberts, and approved with Councilman Beary abstaining, precise development plan and architecture for a commercial/ professional warehouse building located east of Commerce Boulevard, north of the California Skate structure (A.P. No. 143-020-51) was approved subject to conditions recommended in the planning staff report and changing the required setback from 50 feet to 43 feet from Commerce Boulevard right-of-way. AYES: (4) Councilmen Eck, Hopkins, Roberts and Flores NOES: (0) None ABSTAI14: (1) Councilman Beary File No. 0512 - Frank Jones, Use Permit Application Councilman Eck Leaves and Returns Page 11 January 24, 1977 City Manager Callinan reviewed his.memo to the City Council, dated January 20, 1977, concerning Frank Jones use permit application for a retail nursery located at 5665 South Santa Rosa Avenue. Planning Director Skanchy described the:site plan and elevations, which were displayed, .parking, storage area, and fencing. Councilman'Eck left the Council Chambers at approximately 10:54 and returned at approximately 10:55 p.m. Planning Director Skanchy continued explaining the Planning Commission's approval of the use .permit subject to conditions and related items. Mr. Norman Francisco, 5665 South' Santa Rosa Avenue, was recognized and reflected that the conditions imposed on the applicant, Mr. Jones, were to make him,as property owner, comply with prior conditions imposed by the City. Mr. Francisco generally discussed future construction, landscaping, bumper guards and striping, landscaping and dedication and improvement of road right -of -way. Discussion followed between Mr. Francisco, City Manager Callinan and members of the City Council. Councilman Eck made'a motion to approve Frank Jones use permit application for a retail nursery at 5665 South Santa Rosa Avenue, subject to those conditions listed in the staff report and imposed by the Planning Commission. Mr. Frank Jones, 965 Elizabeth Avenue, was recognized and generally discussed approval of his use permit in relationship - to conditions imposed on Mr. Francisco, reminded that the City would benefit from,.sales, tax derived from the busimss. Mr. Francisco informed that the Council's position would leave him no choice but to return the applicant's deposit. Councilman Hopkins seconded the motion made by Councilman Eck, which was approved by the roll call vote, approving Frank Jones' use permit application for a retail nursery,. at 5665 South Santa Rosa Avenue (A.P. No. 143- 040 -40) sub- ject to conditions contained in the staff report and stipulat- ing that `a building permit cannot be issued until Mr. Francisco complies with conditions (prior and current) and that Mr. Jones resubmit revised building plans fcr review by the Planning Commission. AYES: (3) Councilmen Eck, Hopkins, and Flores NOES: (2) Councilmen Beary and Roberts Page 12 January 24, 1977 Housing and- City Manager Callinan reviewed his memo to the City Qouncil,; Community dated January 2�,' 977 cofi�eriiiiig the Housii<g and ,Community �;�-y T1., 'Z- .. ,-; i- a n +- 'Clotra i nt♦rriari+ A n+ Mayor Flores declared the public hearing open re. the City's proposed application under the Housing and Community Develop- ment Act. There being no one desiring to be heard, and no written " communications received, Mayor Flores declared the.public,, hearing closed. Upon motion of Councilman Beary, seconded by Councilman Eck, and unanimously approved, the-Council authorized staff to submit an application�.under'the. Housing and Community ♦ 1, 11Y 11 Deveiopmeut Act for l) a water storage Cann in 1i neighbor- hood, 2) pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Copeland Creek, 3) pedestrian walkway over U.S. 101 freeway. Transit'Shuttle City Manager Callinan reviewed his memo to the City Council, Service dated January 20, 1977, concerning transit service provided by Petaluma and proposed increase:.n student's local fare. Discussion followed. Upon motion of Councilman Eck, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved,.the.City Council endorsed the increase in the student's local fare from 15� to 25� and the issuance of transfer tickets as outlined in the County of Sonoma's January 4,,.977 letter. Resolution No, 77 -09 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK SOLICITING SEALED BIDS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WELL NO. 14 AND DECLARING AND DETERMINING THAT AN EMERGENCY.EXISTS city MAnager-Callinan reviewed his memo to the City Council dated January'20, 1977, concerning construction of an additional City well® Upon motion of Councilman Beary, seconded by Councilman Roberts, and unanimously approved, reading of Resolution No, 77 -09 was waived and said resolution was adopted. North Marin County City Manager Callinan introduced Mr. John Nelson of North Mater District and Marin County Water Di Page 13 January 24, 1977 Councilman Beary made a motion to accept the agreement with an amendment to include that if an emergency arose that Rohnert Park would have the ability to "buy back" subject wells and further to include that North Marin and Petaluma would not receive water for any less than they are now getting by aqueduct and that the difference be credited to Rohnert Park to defray the cost of Rohnert Park buying the wells when the agreement expires. Said motion died for lack of a seoncd. Upon motion of Mayor Flores, seconded by Councilman Eck, and approved by the following vote, Mayor Flores and Council- man Hopkins were appointed to a committee to meet and confer with staff and the other agencies concerning the proposed agreement with the Sonoma County Water Agency, North Marin County Water District and City of Petaluma for development of two wells. AXES: (4) Councilmen Beary, Eck, Hopkins and Flores NOES: (1) Councilman Roberts Adjournment Mayor Flores adjourned the Council meeting at this point, the time being approximately 11:20 p.m. J-11 o,_ r Deputy City Clerk APPROVED: / Mayor