Loading...
1972/06/19 City Council MinutesCall to Order Roll Call ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL MINUTES June 19, 1972 The Council of the'City of Rohnert Park met this date in regular session commencing at 7:40 p.m. in the City Offices, 435 Southwest Boulevard, Rohnert Park, with Mayor Roberts presiding. The regular session was preceded by an executive session which commenced at 7:00 p.m. and at which all Councilmen and City Manager Callinan were present and which was held to discuss appointments to Commissions. Mayor Roberts .called the meeting of the regular session to order at approximately 7:40 p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance. Present: (5). Councilmen Beary, Flores, Hopkins, Smith, and.Roberts Absent : ( 0) None Staff Present for all or part of the meeting: City Manager Callinan, City Attorney Maxwell, Engineer Hudis, and County Planner John Scudero Approval of Minutes Councilman Beary stated for the record that on page 10 paragraph two of the June 5 minutes, the word "being" should be inserted in the last phrase, i.e. "that it was not fair to parks currently being filled up." Upon motion of Councilman Smith, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, the minutes of June 5, 1972 were approved as corrected. Approval of Bills Upon motion of Councilman Flores, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, the bills presented per the attached list in the amount of $103,198.81 were approved. Communications Communications per the attached outline were brought to the attention of the Council. No action was taken on any communication except as noted specifically in these minutes. Resignation of Parks City Manager Callinan read the letter of resig -- and Recreation Com- nation from Parks and Recreation Commissioner missioner Rasmussen Rasmussen. Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Flores, and unanimously approved, the resignation of Ronald Rasmussen from the Parks and Recreation Commission was accepted with regret and staff directed to send a letter over the Mayor's signature commending him for his services. Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, the reading of Resolution No. 72 -89 was waived and said resolution adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72-90 A RESOLUTI`ON',A.PPOINTING ENGINEER AND ATTORNEYS ( Himebaugh Creek, et al Improvement Project No. 1971 -3) City Manager Callinan .explained the resolution'. UPon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, -the reading of Reslution No. 72 -90 was waived and said resolution adopted.. RESOLUTION N0. 72 -91,, A RESOLUTION OF I14TENTION TO ACQUIRE AND CON- - STRUCT IMPROVEMENTS (Hi:mebaugh Creek, et al Improvement Project No. 1971 -3) Page 2. June 19, 1972 Petaluma School District Councilman Hopkins initiated a discussion regard - ing the Petaluma High School District resolution concerning limitation on residential development. Upon motion of Councilman Smith, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, an invitation to the Cotati City Council, Cotati School District Board of Trustees, and the Petaluma High School District Board will be extended to meet with this Council within the next two weeks in a public meeting to discuss mutual school problems. It was stressed that reasonable representation from each entity should be in attendance. Redwood Empire Division - League of A brief discussion was held concerning choice of delegate California Cities a to the Redwood Empire Division, League of California Cities meetings. Mayor Roberts was designated as delegate with the remaining Councilmen being designated alternates. Project No. 1971 -3 Hinebaugh Creek City Manager Callinan reported that $8,000 had been received from the Rohnerts and $2,000 from Spivock Company to guarantee the engineering costs for the improvement of Hinebaugh Creek Drainage Plan and a report from Engineer Hudis stating there is a majority of theproperty owners petitioning for an assessment district had been received. RESOLUTION NO. 72-89 A RESOLUTION DETERMINING TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AND ASSESSMENT BOND ACTS FOR THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT PROCEEDINGS UNDER DIVISION 4 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE ( Himebaugh Creek, et al Improvement Project No. 1971 ®3) City Manager Callinan explained the resolution. Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, the reading of Resolution No. 72 -89 was waived and said resolution adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72-90 A RESOLUTI`ON',A.PPOINTING ENGINEER AND ATTORNEYS ( Himebaugh Creek, et al Improvement Project No. 1971 -3) City Manager Callinan .explained the resolution'. UPon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, -the reading of Reslution No. 72 -90 was waived and said resolution adopted.. RESOLUTION N0. 72 -91,, A RESOLUTION OF I14TENTION TO ACQUIRE AND CON- - STRUCT IMPROVEMENTS (Hi:mebaugh Creek, et al Improvement Project No. 1971 -3) Upon motion of Councilman Smith, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved with Mayor Roberts absent, the proposed project for improvement of Snyder Lane between Southwest Boulevard and East Cotati Avenue was endorsed with the provision that a bike lane be included in said project., and staff,authorized to call for bids on said project. Mayor Roberts Mayor Roberts returned to the Council Chambers Returns at approximately 8:05 p.m., and resumed the chairing of the meeting. File No. 0228 - Ewell City ManagerCallinan read the planning staff Baker Application report on File No. 0228, Ewell Baker application for Rezoning for rezoning of two acres on Commerce Boulevard. Discussion followed concerning the planned use for the site and whether or not the entire two acres should be rezoned or confine the rezoning to the area required for the veterinarian hos- pital. Councilman Hopkins made a motion, seconded by Councilman Smith, to deny the application. Discussion followed during which it was pointed out that the matter could not be brought up again for a year if tree Council denied same. Councilmen Hopkins and Smith withdrew their motion and second respectively. Upon motion of'Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Smith, and unanimously approved, Page 3. June 19, 1972 City Manager Callinan explained the resolution. Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, the reading of Resolution`No.' 72-91 was waived and said resolution adopted. Project No. 19728 City Manager Callinan reported that staff had Snyder Lane been trying to work out a plan to build a 24 foot wide road section on Snyder Lane from Southwest Boulevard to East Cotati Avenue with dirt and oil shoulders and ditches for drainage in order to keep the cost as low as possible,:: " He advised that Don Head, Sonoma County Director of Public Works, had indicated the county did not have the money to share the cost right now but hopes to soon and is willing to make a recommen- dation for county participation in the proposed project up to $15,00'0. Discussion followed concerning inclusion of a bike path in the project. Mayor Roberts Mayor Roberts turned the gavel over to Vice Leaves Mayor Flores and left theCouncil Chambers at approximately 8:00 p.m. Upon motion of Councilman Smith, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved with Mayor Roberts absent, the proposed project for improvement of Snyder Lane between Southwest Boulevard and East Cotati Avenue was endorsed with the provision that a bike lane be included in said project., and staff,authorized to call for bids on said project. Mayor Roberts Mayor Roberts returned to the Council Chambers Returns at approximately 8:05 p.m., and resumed the chairing of the meeting. File No. 0228 - Ewell City ManagerCallinan read the planning staff Baker Application report on File No. 0228, Ewell Baker application for Rezoning for rezoning of two acres on Commerce Boulevard. Discussion followed concerning the planned use for the site and whether or not the entire two acres should be rezoned or confine the rezoning to the area required for the veterinarian hos- pital. Councilman Hopkins made a motion, seconded by Councilman Smith, to deny the application. Discussion followed during which it was pointed out that the matter could not be brought up again for a year if tree Council denied same. Councilmen Hopkins and Smith withdrew their motion and second respectively. Upon motion of'Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Smith, and unanimously approved, Page 4, June 19, 1972 ' Mr. Callinan read letters on the matter as follows: (1) From Sonoma County Planning Director George Kovatch requesting that no action be taken until the Sonoma State College Environs Plan is considered because the road plans, are in conflict. (2) From Sonoma County Director of Environmen- tal Health, Lester N. Bennett, Jr. dated June 12, 1972. (3), From Sonoma County Director of Public Works Donald B. Head dated June 14, 1972 which indicated that Myrtle Avenue should be ,widened to its ultimate width. Mr. Callinan, noted that copies of all the above had been sent -to each Councilman. Mr. Callinan briefly reviewed.the site plans, drawings., and tentative map for Holiday Park, Uhi'ts- 3, 4, and 5 which were on display and advised the applicati6n.had,been discussed with the Parks'and,Re6reati6n Commission and some of the conditions were recommendations of that body. County Planner John Scudero was recognized and spoke concerning the conflict in the alignment of Roberts Road as shown on the Holiday Park tentative map and the Sonoma State College Environs Study. Discussion followed. action.was deferred on Mr. Baker's application for rezoning to -the next regular meeting and staff directed to write Mr. Baker a letter indi- cating the Council's displeasure with him for missing two meetings and that the application would be denied if he failed to appear at the next regular meeting. File No. 0235 City Manager Callinan reported that notices of Forhim Corperation- the scheduled public hearing on the Forhim Application for Corporation application for zoning to "R-1-.6000- Rezoning PD" of approximately 75'acres, including park and school sites, in the Holiday Park area south of East,Cotati Avenue had been published in The Clarion, sent to property owners in the area, and that copies of the tentative map had been sent to each member of the Council; that the 'Planning Commission had adopted a resolution recommending approval of the application and that the Planning Commission had considered the tentative map and had approved same subject to conditions. Mr. Callinan read letters on the matter as follows: (1) From Sonoma County Planning Director George Kovatch requesting that no action be taken until the Sonoma State College Environs Plan is considered because the road plans, are in conflict. (2) From Sonoma County Director of Environmen- tal Health, Lester N. Bennett, Jr. dated June 12, 1972. (3), From Sonoma County Director of Public Works Donald B. Head dated June 14, 1972 which indicated that Myrtle Avenue should be ,widened to its ultimate width. Mr. Callinan, noted that copies of all the above had been sent -to each Councilman. Mr. Callinan briefly reviewed.the site plans, drawings., and tentative map for Holiday Park, Uhi'ts- 3, 4, and 5 which were on display and advised the applicati6n.had,been discussed with the Parks'and,Re6reati6n Commission and some of the conditions were recommendations of that body. County Planner John Scudero was recognized and spoke concerning the conflict in the alignment of Roberts Road as shown on the Holiday Park tentative map and the Sonoma State College Environs Study. Discussion followed. Page 5. June 19, 1972 Mayor Roberts declared the public hearing open on the application of Forhim Corporation for zoning to "R- 1- 6000 -PD" of approximately 75 acres in the Holiday Park area south of East Cotati Avenue. City Manager Callinan reported that no written communicationshad been received for the public hearing. Mr. Harold Heers, President of Forhim Corporation was recognized and explained the plans on dis- play and noted that he had studied the Sonoma State College Environs Study extensively and felt the alignment of Roberts Road could be worked out and reminded that the County Board of Supervisors would have the final decision on the Environs Study and that might be several months away. Discussion followed regarding the amount of open space in the proposed plan. Mr. Heers advised there were approximately six acres of open space in addition to the five acre park site already dedicated which figures out to approximately the same density as 6500 square foot lots. More discussion followed concerning how credit would be allowed for park improvements against the Recreation Facilities Improvements fee. Mr. Barry Godolphin, 332 Burton Avenue, was recognized and suggested that action be delayed until after the.College Environs Study is con - sidered. There being no one further desiring to be heard, Mayor Roberts declared the public hearing closed. Discussion followed concerning the Planning Commission not being aware that the plan was in conflict with the Environs Study road patterns, the open space and bike path being behind single family homes and policing and maintenance of same, and the possible need for public service sites south of East Cotati Avenue. Mayor Roberts stated he would not allow any con- sideration of the Sonoma State College Environs Plan prior to the scheduled public hearing on same. More discussion followed. Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Flores,.and approved by the following roll call vote, the application of Forhim Corporation for zoning to "fR- 1- 6000PD " of approximately 75 acres in Holiday Park area south of East Cotati Avenue was approved. Ordinance -No. 177 Page 6. June 19, 1972 AYES: (3) Councilmen Flores, Hopkins, and Roberts NOES: (2) Councilmen Beary and Smith Councilman Beary stated for the record that he voted no, even though he liked the plan, due to the recommendation of the county planner, the comments from Mr. Kovatch regarding road align- ment conflict, and no adequate cost analysis of maintenance. Councilman Flores stated for the record he voted yes because this was a unique plan and hoped there would be more plans submitted including landscaped bike paths and he has an obligation to the residents when an opportunity such as this is open. Councilman Hopkins stated for the record he does not understand the conflict of two county departments and would have to agree that the Road Department knows more about roads than the Planning Department and therefore voted yes. Councilman Smith stated for the record that the Environs Plan is one of the most important plans before this community; that the county had been pressured for many years to come forth with a plan.and Sonoma State College had been urged to participate; a public hearing had been recommend- ed; the Planning.Commission did not specifically consider the road patterns; does not know if Roberts Road is in the right Position; does not think this subdivision cannot wait for another two weeks; is concerned that the bike paths are not sufficient - should also have some on the streets; has not seen sufficient figures to justify the subdivision; and was concerned that this plan had been expedited prior to the 6500 square foot minimum lot size ordinance becoming effective. City Manager Callinan advised that it would be appropriate to introduce an ordinance to effect the zoning change, but since the map does require some changes, staff would expect a corrected map incorporating the County Road Department request for Myrtle Avenue to be full width. ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 63, ZONING ORDINANCE (Zoning Map Change--Forhim Corp. File 0235) City Manager Callinan explained the ordinance. Upon motion.-of.Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Flores, and approved by the following Ordinance No. 175 Page 7. June 19, 1972 roll call vote, the reading of Ordinance No. 177 was waived and said ordinance was introduced: AYES: (3) Councilmen Flores, Hopkins, and Roberts NOES- (2) Councilmen Beary and Smith Upon motion of Councilman.Flores, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and approved by the follow- ing voice vote, the final map for Holiday Park Subdivision No. 3 was approved and the Mayor authorized to enter into an appropriate sub- division agreement, subject to the rezoning becoming effective, and subject to the change in the map on Myrtle Avenue to provide for its full width improvement. ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 63--ZONING ORDINANCE (Zoning Map:Change--Codding Enterprises File 0229) City Manager Callinan explained the ordinance. Upon motion of Councilman Flores, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved by the following.roll call vote, the reading of Ordinance. No,.,.,,,175 was waived and said ordinance was adopted.,.., AYES: (5) Councilmen Beary, Flores, Hopkins, Smith, and Roberts NOES: (0) None Ordinance No. 176 AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE USE OF FIREARMS AND GUNS WITHIN THE CITY; PROVIDING EXCEPTIONS THERETO; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF ...City Manager Callinan explained the ordinance. Upon motion,of Councilman'Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved by the following roll call vote, ..the reading of Ordinance No. 176 was waived and said ordinance was adopted:. AYES: (5) Councilmen Beary, Flores, Hopkins, Smith, and Roberts NOES: (0) None The Council questioned if any information pro- gram had been coordinated with the schools regarding the use of firearms. Director of Public Safety Dennett responded that there had ORDINANCE NO. 178 Page 8® June 19, 1972 not, but Officer Amantite is a Hunter Safety "Instructor and, the two programs could be coordinated. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA x-UBJ.J'LC. EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM City Manager Callihan explained the ordinance. 'Upon motion of.Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, the reading of Ordinance No. 178 was waived and said ordinance was introduced. Resolution No. 7292 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING MAKING OF AMENDED ASSESS MENT RE CERTAIN ASSESSMENTS UNDER RESOLUTION OF– INTENTION NO. 7 (Project No. 1956-1, Assessment No. 6.9.2.3) 1 City ManagerCallinan explained the resolution. Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Flores, and unanimously approved, the reading of Resolution No. 72-92 was waived and said resolution was adopted. Resolution No. 72-93 RESOLUTION URGING LIMITATION UPON SIZE OF' CALIFORNIA STATE COLLEGE—SONOMA CAMPUS City Attorney Maxwell read Resolution No. 72-93. Mayor Roberts Leaves Mayor Roberts turned the gavel over to Vice Mayor Flores and left theCouncil Chambers at approximately 9:25 p.m.' Upon motion of Councilman Beary, seconded by Councilman Smith, and unanimously approved with Mayor Roberts absent, Reoslution No. 72:-93 was adopted. Resolution No. 72.--94 RESOLUTION ' AUTHORIZING PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF' SONOMA (Sonoma State College Expressway) City Manager Callihan explained the resolution. Upon motion of Councilman Smith, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved with Mayor Roberts absent, the reading of Reoslution No. 72-94 was waived and said resolution was adopted. Uponmotion of Councilman Smith, seconded by :oun,cilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, Page 9. June 19, 1972 with Mayor Roberts absent, the Council indicated that in considering the agremeent referred to in Resolution No. 72-94 the road which is shown 300' + from the railroad is not being considered for definite alignment. Mayor Roberts Returns Mayor Roberts returned to the Council Chambers at,approximately 9030 p.m. and resumed chairing of the meeting. Resolution No. 72-95 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID OF MOTOROLA CORPORATION (CCCJ Grant -Radio Equipment) City Manager Callinan explained the resolution and the two bids received from Motorola and General Electric, referring to Chief Dennett's memo which recommended the contract be awarded to Motorola even though G. E. was slightly lower however their bid did not meet all specifications Upon motion of-Councilman- Smith, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and - unanimously approved, the reading of Resolution No. 7295 was waived and said resolution was adopted. Redwood Empire Mayor Roberts recognized. Mr. and Mrs. Q. Burch - Kennel Club Dog field, 7517 Bernice, and a group of neighbors Show who wished to appeal the Parks and Recreation Commission decision to.have the Redwood Empire kennel Club Dog Show in Benecia Park again in 1973. Mr. Burchfield appealed to the Council to reconsider the Parks and Recreation decision, noting that noise of vehicles arriving for the show is a problem to neighbors, parking is a problem, shrubs and fences had been damaged in the past, litter is a problem, and flies are now becoming a problem. He stated further that it is impossible to walk in the park for two or three days after the dog show until after the droppings are cleaned up. City Manager Callinan noted that Director of Parks and Recreation Pekkain was trying to get the dog show moved to the high school. Dis- cussion followed. Councilman Flores made a motion, seconded by Mc yor Roberts, to grant ;a permit for the dog show subject to approval of use of the high school facilities for..same< Discussion followed. Mayor Roberts withdrew his second to the above motion. Councilman Flores motion died for lack a second. Page 10. June 19, 1972 Upon motion of Councilman Smith, seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, ,staff was directed to schedule a public hearing .,,on the dog show matter if the high school is not available, giving notice to all organizations that have participated in the past, the Kennel Club, and property owners adjacent to the park. Recess Mayor Roberts declared a recess at this point in the meeting, the time being approximately 10:00 P.M. Reconvene Mayor Roberts reconvened the meeting at approxi- mately;10:08 P.M. Commissions Mayor Roberts announced that an executive session 'had been held prior to the regular meeting to discuss appointments to the Parks and Recreation and other commissions and that no action had been taken. Discussion followed regarding changing the terms of Planning Commissioners. Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Flores, and approved by the following voice vote, staff was directed to prepare an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to provide for one year terms for Planning Commissioners to run from January 1 to December 31 and that the Planning Commission be directed to hold a-public hearing on said proposed amendment and report back to the Council: AYES: (3) Councilmen Flores, Hopkins, and Roberts NOES: (2) Councilmen Beary and Smith Councilman Flores stated for the record that this was a very important step and since it hac been brought tip in Council discussions the matter should have a public hearing. Councilman Smith stated for the record he voted no since nothing had been demonstrated during the evening to warrant a change. Councilman Beary stated for the record he voted no because the City Council now has the discre- tionary power to remove a man and this is an ample safeguard for the Council. Councilman Flores stated for the record that he seconded the motion because this is a unique step; it had been brought up and he feels that the Planning Commission should have an opporturi- ity to comment on it and feels this is the full ­ntent of the motion without stating specifically f,ihether-or. not an individual Councilman is for or against it.:, ' ' Page 11. June 19, 1972 Councilman Smith made a motion, seconded by Councilman Beary, to reappoint all current members to the Parks and Recreation Commission which was defeated by the following roll call vote: AYES: (2) Councilmen Beary and Smith NOES: (3) Councilmen Flores, Hopkins, and Roberts In response to a question, City Attorney Maxwell opinioned that as of July 1, 1972 all the offices for the Parks and Recreation Commission would be vacant unless appointments are made. Discussion followed regarding a joint meeting with the Parks and Recreation Commission. Upon motion of Councilman Flores, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, Dr. John S. Bullen.was reappointed to another four year term on the Cultural Arts Commission. Adjournment to Upon motion of Councilman Flores, seconded by Executive Session Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, the Coun cif adjourned to executive session at 10:30 p.m. to discuss appointments to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Reconvene The executive session was adjourned and the regular meeting was reconvened at 11:05 p.m. with all Councilmen present. Mayor Roberts announced that the Council had met in executive session to discuss appointments to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Upon motion of Councilman Flores, seconded by Councilman Smith, and unanimously approved, the six remaining commissioners were appointed for another year, i.e. 1972 -73. Upon motion of Councilman Flores, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, Dick Driggs was appointed to fill the vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Commission, effective with the 1972 - -73 term. Upon motion of Councilman Flores, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved , Hayes Hunter was appointed Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Mayor Roberts advised that during the executive - session the duties and functions of the Parks r.nd Recreation Commiss�_on had been .discussed and Page 12. June 19, 1972 there were certain changes the Council would ,—like to see carried out which would be discussed with,,the commission during a joint meeting. Upon motion of Councilman Smith, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, City Attorney Maxwell was directed to prepare, and have ready for introduction at the next regular meeting, an ordinance that would change the Parks and Recreation Commission meetings from twice monthly to once monthly, Architectural Review Mayor Roberts initiated a discussion concerning action taken on architectural review at the June 5 meeting and his understanding that it would not apply to builders who have already built in the city and intend to continue with the same type Of construction. Discussion followed. Upon motion of Councilman Flores, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved staff was directed to send a memo to the Planning Commission of the vote taken at the June 5, meeting regarding architectural review and advise that Condiotti Enterprises' development would be exempted from architectural review if construction was to be the same as in its last development, and approved by the following voice vote,, Forhim Corporation would be exempted from ,architectural review if construction was to be the same as in its last development: AYES: (4) Councilmen Beary, Flores, Hopkins, and Roberts NOES: (1) Councilman Smith City Manager Callinan noted that the Planning 'Commission had'final jurisdiction over the matter. Election District Mayor Roberts initiated a discussion concerning Problems election district problems stating that many citizens do not realize the community is in three supervisorial districts now and therefore will vote indifferent precincts than before. It was suggested that a map be included in the next city newsletter showing the supervisorial districts within the city. Petitions of Support Councilman Hopkins advised that he had given to for Bowling Alley members of the Council, for circulation, and Theatre petitions of support for private construction of, a bowling alley and theatre in the community and requested anyone else interested in circu- lating a petition to contact him at home. Page 13< June 199 1972 Planning Commission Councilman Hopkins initiated a brief discussion Minutes regarding Planning Commission minutes which reflected a 3 -2 vote without any comment. He advised that lie would like to see the reasons reflected in the minutes for no votes. Joint City Council -9 Councilman Beary initiated a brief discussion Parks and Recreation concerning a date for a joint meeting With the Commission Meeting Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. The date was set for June 27 at 7030 p.m. in the Council.Chambers Building.Activity Councilman Beary commented that he would like to have the number of units developed in the past year included in the Development Activity Report prepared by the city staff. Deer Meadow Village Councilman Beary questioned the current status of the Deer Meadow Village development on Arlen Drive. City Manager Callinan responded that he had been contacted by Sierra National Bank representatives regarding the development but believed there were still problems to be worked out with the Bankruptcy Court.. Citizen's Advisory Councilman Smith stated he would like to recoma- Committee mend to the Citizen's Advisory Committee that they prepare a bike system element for the existing part of the city. Councilman Flores responded that sub - committee was exploring same. SB 874 Councilman Smith reported that the League of California Cities a.nd recommended that cities take a position opposing SB 874 which provides for municipal liability for repairs and damages as a result of building in violation of building codes. Discussion followed. Upon motion of Councilman Hopkins, seconded by Councilman Beary, and approved by the following voice vote, the Council went on record in opposition to SB 874: AYES: (4) Councilmen Beary, Flores, Hopkins, and Roberts NOES: (1) Councilman Smith AB 515 Councilman Smith reported that AB 5159 which would establish an emergency telephone number (911) throughout California was being considered. Upon motion of Councilman Flores, seconded by Councilman Hopkins, and unanimously approved, staff was directed to send`a letter to Senators Alquist, Behr, and Collier expressing support for AB 515. Mayors and Council- Mayor Roberts noted that the Mayors and Council- men's Association menis Association Sherrif's Committee for extra services in relation to taxes paid, would be meeting informally with -the County Board of Supervisors. Councilman Flores noted that AB974 deals with county services in relation to taxes. Development Activity City Manager Callinan brought to the attention Report of the Council the Development Activity Report prepared for the Council. A brief discussion followed during which it was recommended that the report be issued to the City Council periodically. Pedestrian Safety City Manager Callinan brought to the attention Vehicle Grant of the Council that a grant had been obtained to repair one of the old police cars for use in the Pedestrian Safety Program. Community Center City Manager Callinan brought to the attention Plants of the Council the replacement of the artificial plants in the Community Center by Mrs. Jane Faust and Mr. Kin Gilley,,of the Pozy Patch florist shop. A brief discussion followed con- cerning the ivy at the Community Center. Mr. Callinan advised that.some changes and improvements were planned for the ivied area. New City Offices City Manager Cdllinan reviewed the outline of Furnishings furniture needs for the new City Offices pre- sented to the Council previously. Discussion followed. Upon motion of Councilman Flores seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, Page 14. June 19, 1972 Complaints from Councilman Flores advised that he had received Residents complaints from residents, particularly in the Mardi Gras Homes, of residents converting car--;. ports into garages without regard to appearance. Discussion followed concerning building permits being required but residents not always obtaining same. Mr. Callinan indicated he would follow up on the complaints. Planning Commission- Councilman Flores reminded that the Council had Joint City Council indicated it would like to have a ioint meeting Meeting with the Planning Commission every three months and it should be scheduled soon. Council indi- cated it would meet with the Planning Commission on June 27 at 8:30 p.m. SB 325 Metropolitan Mayor Roberts initiated a discussion regarding Transit Authority SB.325, which concerns the Metropolitan Transit Authority, during which he pointed at that MTA seems to have a money problem and the only funds that will probably be available to Rohnert Park this year will be for bike paths. Mayors and Council- Mayor Roberts noted that the Mayors and Council- men's Association menis Association Sherrif's Committee for extra services in relation to taxes paid, would be meeting informally with -the County Board of Supervisors. Councilman Flores noted that AB974 deals with county services in relation to taxes. Development Activity City Manager Callinan brought to the attention Report of the Council the Development Activity Report prepared for the Council. A brief discussion followed during which it was recommended that the report be issued to the City Council periodically. Pedestrian Safety City Manager Callinan brought to the attention Vehicle Grant of the Council that a grant had been obtained to repair one of the old police cars for use in the Pedestrian Safety Program. Community Center City Manager Callinan brought to the attention Plants of the Council the replacement of the artificial plants in the Community Center by Mrs. Jane Faust and Mr. Kin Gilley,,of the Pozy Patch florist shop. A brief discussion followed con- cerning the ivy at the Community Center. Mr. Callinan advised that.some changes and improvements were planned for the ivied area. New City Offices City Manager Cdllinan reviewed the outline of Furnishings furniture needs for the new City Offices pre- sented to the Council previously. Discussion followed. Upon motion of Councilman Flores seconded by Councilman Beary, and unanimously approved, Page 15, June 199 1972 staff was authorized to acquire the furniture requirements for the new City Offices. Discussion followed concerning smoking in the new Council Chambers due to carpeted floors and upholstered seating. Upon motion of Councilman Beary9 seconded by Councilman Smith, and unanimously approved, -there will be no smoking allowed in the new Council Chambers. Country Manor Subdi­ City Manager Callinan advised that before the vision, Unit 2 final map for Country Manor, Unit 2, is released Drainage Diversion for recording, the Sonoma County Water Agency Agreement staff had suggested the city obtain an agreement from adjoining property owners holding the city harmless from any liability for diversion of storm water over said lands. He read the agree- ment prepared by the County Water Agency staff and advised it would be between the city and the Rohnerts> Upon motion of Councilman Beary, seconded by Mayor Roberts, and unanimously approved, the agreement was endorsed and the Mayor authorized to sign same. Bay Area Sewage City Manager Callinan reported that he and Mayor Control Board Roberts had attended a meeting of a new agency, the Bay Araa Sewage Control Board, and advised that one member of the Council would be appointed by the County Board of Supervisors to serve on said board. Mayor Roberts reviewed the time that would be involved in serving on the new board. Councilman Hopkins indicated he would be willing to serve. 1972-73 Budget City Manager Callinan noted that the 1972 --73 budget was being worked on and should be typed within the next few days. Coastal Legislation City Attorney Maxwell reported that he had Proposed by Attorney requested copies of the Coastal. Legislation General proposed by the Attorney General but had not yet received same. He had discussed the matter with Mr. Carpenter of the League of California Cities who advised that the League does not oppose the legislation but had not gone on record as favoring it. A brief discussion followed. Planning Commission City Attorney Maxwell advised the Council that Communications a standard form of resolution citing detailed reasons for Planning Commission recommendations would only be used on rezoning applications which are controversial and not on routine Page 16. June 19, 1972 rezoningse The Council indicated its agreement with this procedure. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Roberts adjourned the meeting at 12:13 a.m. eput itl C1prk APPR E� w_ Mayor