1971/10/04 City Council MinutesROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 4, 1971
The Council of the City of Rohnert Park met this date in
regular session commencing at 7:05 p.m. in the City Offices,
435 Southwest Blvd., Rohnert Park, with Mayor Hopkins pre -
siding.
Call to Order Mayor Hopkins called the meeting of the regular session
to order at approximately 7:05 p.m.
Present: (5) Councilmen Buchanan, Roberts, Rogers, Smith
and Hopkins
Absent: (0) None
Staff Present for all or part of the meeting:
City Manager Callinan, Deputy City Attorney Mawson,
Assistant to the City Manager Albright, Engineer Hudis,
and Planning Consultant Wes Vail
Approval of Minutes Councilman Smith brought to the attention of the Council
the fact that the September 7 minutes did not reflect his
no vote on Pile No. 0137, Ryan Outdoor Advertising, and
also that he would like the minutes to reflect the dis-
cussion he initiated regarding the proposed sign being
located on public property without cost to Ryan Outdoor
Advertising. He further advised that his position had not
changed since Ryan Outdoor Advertising had failed to pro-
vide the Council with dollar figures showing what it would
cost if the sign were paid for and also the dollar figure
showing the loss of revenue to Ryan Outdoor Advertising for
free use of one side of the sign by the city.
Upon motion of Councilman Buchanan, seconded by Councilman
Rogers, and unanimously approved, the minutes of September
7 were approved as corrected and the minutes of September
8, 20 and 23 were approved as submitted.
Approval of Bills Several of the Councilmen requested that action on the bills
be delayed to allow time to review a copy of Mayor Hopkins
expense voucher.
Sergeant - Depart- Director of Public Safety Dennett introduced Sergeant Lee
ment of Public Safety Holmes, explaining that he was the first sergeant in the
department and had been selected by placing first in the
written examination given to five officers in the depart -
ment and first in the oral reviews administered by the
Chiefs of the Petaluma and Sonoma Police Departments and
the City Manager of Sebastopol. The Council extended con-
gratulations to Sergeant Holmes.
Communications Communications per the attached outline were brought to the
attention of the Council. No action was taken on any com-
munication except as noted specifically in these minutes.
Resignation of Mrs. A.letter of resignation from Mrs. Reba Roberts from the
Reba Roberts from Cultural Arts Commission was,brought to the Council's
Cultural Arts Com- attention by City Manager Callinan.
mission
Page -2- October 4, 1971
Upon motion by Councilman Smith, seconded by Councilman
Rogers, and approved with Councilman Roberts abstaining
Mrs. Roberts's resignation from the Cultural Arts Commission
was accepted with regret.
Councilman Smith noted that Mrs. Roberts had contributed
much to the various commissions and committees in Rohnert
Park and hoped her resignation from the Cultural Arts Com-
mission did not mean an end to her activities.
.Approval of Bills
Upon motion of Councilman Rogers, seconded by Councilman
Buchanan, and unanimously approved, the bills presented
per the attached list in the amount of $7,242.37 were
approved.
Project No. 1971 -2
City Manager Callinan reported that Mr. Martin Stone was
Snyder Lane
still trying to work out a satisfactory bid on the bonds
for Project No. 1971 -2, Snyder Lane, and requested that the
matter be deferred until the next regular meeting. The
Council consented.
Resolution No. 71 -125
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GRANT DEEDS (Snyder Lane Improvement
Project No. 1971 -2)
City Manager Callinan summarized the resolution.
Upon motion of Councilman Rogers, seconded by Councilman
Buchanan, and unanimously approved, the reading of Resolu-
tion No. 71 -125 was waived and said resolution was adopted.
Mr. Art Howard appeared and related that Mr. Raymond Pollard
was not in agreement with the Snyder Lane Project, and had
not received notification of the current project. City
Manager Callinan advised that Mr. Pollard's partner's add-
ress was listed on the tax rolls, that notice had been
mailed by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and no
letter of protest had been received at the public hearing.
_
Mr. Howard reported that Mr.,Pollard's partner, Roy Lindorf
had been out of'•tho country for some time.
Project No. 1968 -1a
Engineer Hudis reported that work had just begun on Project
Coddingland Unit No. 2
No. 1968 -1a,, Coddingland Unit No. 2, and that Progress
Payment No. 1 listed on the agenda should be deferred to
the next regular meeting.
City Manager Callinan reported that Mr. Chris Knudtsen, one
of the property owners, had elected to pay cash and -there-
fore his assessment was being reduced accordingly to give
him credit for the bond discount included in the assessment.
Resolution No. 71 -126
A RESOLUTION ORDERING REDUCTION OF ASSESSMENT NO. 5 (Codding-
land Unit 2 Assessment District 1968 --1a)
City Manager Callinan summarized the resolution.
Upon motion of Councilian;Rogers, seconded by Councilman
Page -3- October 4, 1971
Roberts, and unanimously approved, the reading of Resolution
No. 71 -126 was waived and said.resolution was adopted.
Resolution No. 71 -127
DETERMINING UNPAID ASSESSMENTS,AND PROVIDING FOR ISSUANCE
OF BONDS (Coddingland Unit 2 Assessment District 1968 -1a)
City Manager Callinan summarized the resolution.
Upon motion of Councilman Buchanan, seconded by Councilman
Rogers, and unanimously approved, the reading of Resolution
No. 71 -227 was waived and said resolution was adopted.
Emergency Employment
City Manager Callinan reported.that under the Emergency
Act of 1971
Employment Act of 1971 seven positions had been approved
for the city and the federal share of the cost was approxi-
mately $46,890- The city must supply 100 of the cost but
he advised that this could be covered by providing office
space, supervision, etc. and that it was anticipated that
the only cash outlay would be for desks for the two clerk's
Positions. Discussion followed concerning the working
details of the program.
Resolution No. 71 -128
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF SO_011A
(Emergency Employment Act of 1971)
City Manager Callinan summarized the resolution.
Upon motion of Councilman Rogers, seconded by Councilman
Buchanan, and unanimously approved, the reading of Resolu-
tion No. 71 -128 was waived and said resolution was adopted.
File No. 0196
City Manager Callinan reviewed the application of Sonoma
Sonoma Campus Co.
Campus Co, for rezoning of lots in Colegio Vista Subdivi-
Appl. for Rezoning
sion No. 1 from R -1 (Single Family) to R -2, (Two Family)
and advised that since the words "Public Hearing" had not
appeared on the agenda for the last meeting, another
notice of public hearing had been published in The Clarion
and sent to,property owners again. Discussion followed re-
garding conditions that should be placed on the area which
were discussed at the last meeting and City Manager Calli-
nan again reviewed his memo dated September 17, 1971 out -
lining the suggested conditions. Deputy City Attorney
Mawson reviewed his written opinion dated October 1 regard -
ing the placing of conditions on property being rezoned
which suggested that the PD(Planned Development) classifi-
cation be added to the R2 -3,000 and that a variance be
granted from the minimum size requirements of 200,000 square
feet for a planned unit development. He reported that the
suggestion had been discussed with County Planner Wes Vail
who advised that location of the lots made this an ideal
situation for a planned unit development. City Manager
Callinan advised that Sonoma Campus Co. representatives in-
dicated that they would .like ,to have two of the lots re-
zoned tonight so that, -they can proceed to build as ;soon as
,possible and that they would make application for the R2-
3,000- PD.rezoning.for the remainder of the lots and a public
hearing, set for .the next. regular, meeting.
Page -4- October 4, 1971
Mayor Hopkins declared the scheduled public hearing open
on the application of Sonoma Campus Company for rezoning of
certain lots in Colegio Vista Subdivision No. 1 from R -1-
8000 to R- 2- 3,000.
Mr. Alan Forsyth of Sonoma Campus Co. appeared and spoke in
support of the application advising that in his opinion the
R -2 classification would be the best use of the property.
Mr. Olaf Gross, owner of the Tivoli Garden Apartments, was
recognized. He advised that he had no personal interest in
the lots and /or the proposed development but did have an
interest in Rohnert Park and property in the area, and re-
guested that the rezoning be granted as requested.
Mr. John Smaby was recognized and questioned how many units
were involved. Mr. Art Howard, in response, advised there
were 16 lots which would accommodate 32 units and each lot
was approximately 821 x 1101.
There being no one further desiring to be heard, Mayor
Hopkins declared the public hearing closed.
Councilman Rogers made a motion which was seconded by Coun-
cilman Buchanan to approve the concept•.of R -2 zoning for the
lots in Colegio Vista Subdivision No. 1 as requested by
Sonoma Campus Company.
Discussion followed during which the Council was polled on
the matter.
Councilman Smith indicated he was opposed to the rezoning on
the grounds that other owners of R -1 lots could request R -2
zoning since this would set a precedent. Councilman Robert--
agreed with Councilman Smith's position. Mayor Hopkins in-
dicated he would agree to the rezoning if he could feel
assured that control could be maintained over the develop-
ment. County Planner Vail reiterated that R2 -PD would give
the control and apply to the present owners as well as future
owners of the property. More discussion followed.
Councilman Rogers' motion failed by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:, (2) Councilmen Buchanan and Rogers
NOES: (3) Councilmen Roberts, Smith and Hopkins
File No 0137 City Manager Callinan reviewed the request of Ryan Outdoor
Proposed Amendment Advertising for an extension of time for its existing bill -
To Zoning Ordinance board on the west side of the freeway and for a new one on
Re Billboards the east side of the freeway on Commerce Blvd. with one side
of'the sign to be..devoted to advertising the golf course and
the other side used for commercial advertising with local
businesses being given priority for use. He also summarized
the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance.
County Planner Vail advised that in addition to city require -
Page -5- October 4, 1971
ments for signs, the state also has controls which would
apply since the requested sign location was on a state high-
way. He reported that the state requires signs to be placed
at least 500 feet apart and they could only be located in
commercial and industrial areas. He further reported that
nearly all major roads in Sonoma County have been designated
as scenic highways and the county only allows signs in
commercial and industrial areas. He advised that the ten-
dency over the last few years has been to cut down on the
number of billboards and felt that any more billboards in
Rol-inert Park would clutter the area.
Mayor Hopkins declared open the scheduled public hearing on
the proposed amendment to allow outdoor advertising struc-
tures (billboards) as conditional use in certain commercial
and industrial districts.
Mr. Harvey Burton of Ryan Outdoor Advertising appeared in
support of the proposed amendment and advised that his firm
supported both federal and'..state regulations which recog-
nize outdoor advertising with reasonable controls, i.e.
in industrial and commercial areas.
Mr. Louis Beary was recognized and stated he did not believe
the sign ordinance should be changed.
Mr. Richard Day appeared and stated that Mr. Burton seemed
to be trying to bribe the city by offering one side of the
proposed new sign for advertising the city's golf course.
He expressed opposition to the proposed amendment.
Mr. Lee Adair, Ryan Outdoor Advertising, appeared in support
of the proposed 'amendment and stated the city's existing
ordinance seems to be discriminatory in not allowing another
legal business to come.into the city.
Mrs. Gaye Mullins was recognized and advised she supported
the ordinance as it is now written.
Mr. John Smaby was recognized and expressed support for the
ordinance as it now stands.
Mr. Dallas Gileck was recognized and expressed support for
the ordinance as it now stands and expressed the view that
we now have a good view of the mountains and should not
clutter same.
There being no one further desiring to be heard,, Mayor
Hopkins declared the public hearing closed.
Discussion was held by the Council.
Ordinance No. 156 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TEXT OF ORDINANCE NO. 63 - ZONING
ORDINANCE (Outdoor Advertising Structures)
City Manager Callinan summarized the ordinance.
Application of D & K
Enterprises to Oper-
ate Taxi Services
Page -6- October 4, 1971
Upon motion of Councilman Rogers, seconded by Councilman
Buchanan., and approved by the following roll call vote., the
reading of Ordinance No. 156 was waived and said ordinance
was introduced:
AYES: (3) Councilmen Buchanan, Roberts and Rogers
NOES: (2) Councilmen Smith and Hopkins
Councilman Smith stated for the record that he voted no be-
cause (1) he objected to the change in the ordinance and
(2) objected to the procedure in which it was donee i.e.,
if Ryan's had not offered free advertising space to the city
the ordinance change would not be prostituting the land
owned by citizens of Rohnert Park.
City Manager Callinan reviewed the application of D & K
Enterprises for a certificate of public convenience and
necessity to operate a taxi service in Rohnert Park advising
that the firm presently operates the Santa Rosa Cab Co.,
would have yellow cars with black lettering and would have
the same rates in Rohnert Park as in Santa Rosa. He advised
that.pursuant to city ordinance that the Council in consid-
ering the matter should consider the applicant's financial
responsibility, his moral character, experience in the line
of business, and compliance with state and federal laws.
Mayor Hopkins declared the scheduled public hearing open on
the application of D & K Enterprises for a certificate of
public convenience and necessity to operate a taxi service
in Rohnert Park.
Mr. Richard Stevens, President of D & K Enterprises, appear -
ed and reported that his firm presently operates in Santa
Rosa, Novato, Petaluma and Cotati; that they have the neces-
sary experience, manpower and equipment to do a proper job.
There being no one further desiring to be heard, Mayor
Hopkins declared the public hearing closed.
Upon motion of Councilman Rogers, seconded by Councilman
Buchanan, and unanimously approved, the application of D &
K Enterprises for a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity to operate a taxicab within the City of Rohnert
Park was granted, and the necessary findings made in the
affirmative as to the requirements in the ordinance regu-
lating vehicles for hire.
Pile No. 0194 A brief discussion was held by the Council concerning whether
New City Office or not to take the time to have Architect Lawrence Simons
Building who was present make his presentation concerning the proposed
new city office building. Councilman Rogers asked the
audience to indicate how many had come to the meeting for
the scheduled public hearing on the building. When no one
in the audience indicated in the affirmative, the Council
decided not to have Architect Simon °s presentation.
Page -7- October 4, 1971
City Manager Callinan then briefly explained the new City
office building proposed for construction on Commerce Blvd.
indicating that it would be approximately 7,000 to 8,000
square feet,.would house the Cotati School District Adminis-
tration offices and the city administration offices. He ad-
vised that notice of the public hearing had been published
and sent to many community organizations.
Mayor Hopkins declared the public hearing open on the pro-
posed new city office building on Commerce Boulevard.
Mr. Louis Beary was recognized and spoke in opposition to
the new city office building due to the city's financial
position, but thought design of the building was good. He
expressed the opinion that it seemed many recreational
activities were being urged to become self - supporting, the
new garbage contract negotiated with Redwood Empire Disposal
had been ruled in violation of President Nixon's wage and
price freeze, and that he believed an expenditure of this
size should be put to a vote of the people.
Mr. Andy Camozzi, member of the Cotati School District Board
of Trustees, but speaking as a private citizen, appeared and
advised that the school board had voted 3 -2 in favor of the
new building and not unanimously. He further advised that
he had received comments from many citizens of Cotati who
felt the school board should perhaps go some other direction.
Mr. Bart Mitchell, speaking as President of the Cotati
School District Board of Trustees, advised that the board
had gone on record as approving the new building and this
was the official position. Speaking as a citizen of Rohnert
Park, Mr. Mitchell expressed support for the new building
saying he felt the building was badly needed because city
employees were working under very crowded conditions and
that on several occasions the Council Chambers had been
filled to overflowing.
Mr. Art Howard was recognized and questioned why the build-
ing wasn't being proposed for construction on city owned
land in the proposed Civic Center. City Manager Callinan*
responded, explaining that this 12 acre site was too far
removed from the existing residential areas and that it was
being reserved for future development of a complete Civic
center for the city.
Mr. Louis Beary was again recognized and asked if portable
buildings had been considered for use. City Manager
Callinan replied in the affirmative and also commented on
investigation of a second floor to the existing building,
leased space in the shopping center, and leased space in
the old college buildings.
Councilman Smith reported that the Community Center would
cost approximately $10,000 to remodel for use as a Council
meeting place as opposed to $200,000 proposed for the new
building.
Page -8- October 4, 1971
Councilman Roberts explained that the Council had felt that
use of the Community Center by the Council would have cut
down on its use by the public and for various other reasons
it did not seem to be an appropriate solution.
Councilman Smith Councilman Smith left the Council Chambers during the dis-
Leaves and Returns cussion, the time being approximately 8:35 p.m. He returned
at approximately 8:37 p.m.
Mr. Bill Greer was recognized and stated he felt the matter
should be put to the public for a vote.
Mrs. Mary Gileck was recognized and stated she thought more
publicity should have been given to the public hearing so
more residents would be present and suggested that use of
the Community Center on such occasions should be acceptable.
Mr. Roger Kreischer was recognized and expressed disapproval
of the new office building.
Mr. Louis Beary was again recognized and said that the pro -
posed $350,000 bond issue for the golf course had turned
out to be $600,000 and what guarantee would there be that
$200,000 would be enough for the new building. He also said
he believed the matter should be put to a vote of the people
Mr. Bart Mitchell was again recognized and reminded that
part of the cost would be paid by the Cotati School District,
Mr. Art Howard was again recognized and questioned the
$10,000 to $14,000 annual cost figure for the new building
which he thought seemed conservative.
Mr. Bill Willingham was recognized and asked for clarifica-
tion of the proposed site for the building. City Manager
Callinan explained that it was just north of Copeland Creek
on the east side of Commerce.Blvd.
Mr. Andy Camozzi was again recognized and pointed out that
even 'if the school district does pay part of the anticipated
cost, the same taxpayers support the school district and
the city of Rohnert Park.
Mr. Art Howard was again recognized and again questioned the
annual cost figures and asked how the project would be
financed: City Manager Callinan explained that the Council
had not yet made a decision concerning the financing.
Mr. Louis Beary again spoke saying he felt that temporary
buildings should_be investigated more thoroughly and could
not see justification for.expenditures for a new building
When Recreation Department participants are being asked to
pay higher fees for activities.
Discussion followed regarding the possibility of adding an
upstairs to the existing building. City Manager Callinan
Page -9- October 4, 1971
reviewed the needs of city employees now working under very
crowded conditions and reminded that there was no place to
put new professional people such as a planner or engineer
desired in the future by the Council. He suggested the
matter could be put on -the ballot for a vote of the people
either in a special election or in the April election.
The Council decided to keep the matter under consideration
and talk to as many citizens as possible before the next
regular council meeting to solicit opinions. Mayor Hopkins
closed the public hearing.
Mayor Hopkins introduced Lawrence Simons, architect who
designed the proposed building.
City Manager Callinan responding to earlier comments concern
ing recreation activities, pointed out that it was city
policy to provide facilities and support for various pro-
grams such as Boys Baseball,`Babe Ruth Baseball, Soccer, etc
and to encourage individuals to run these programs rather
than having them totally run by the city.
Citizens for a Mr. Michael Mullins, Chairman, Citizens for a Planned Com-
Planned Community re munity, appeared and read a letter which requested the Coun-
Planning Commission cil to re- establish the Planning Commission. Copies of said
letter were supplied to the Council prior to the meeting.
Discussion followed.
Upon motion of Councilman Rogers, seconded by Councilman
Roberts, and unanimously approved, the Council went on recor<
as being in favor of re- establishing the Planning Commission
and soliciting letters from people interested in serving
on the commission and the Deputy City Attorney was instruc-
ted to prepare a proposed ordinance and that the matter be
scheduled for a public hearing at the next regular Council
meeting.
Chamber of Commerce Mr. Ken Cummings, President of Rohnert Park Chamber of
Commerce, appeared, referred to the printed materialrinclud-
ing a proposed City - Chamber agreement and Chamber budget
suggesting a $6,200 contribution from the city,,supplied to
the Council prior to the meeting, and reported that the
Chamber would like to grow with the city and in order to do
so should be operated as a business and that the Chamber
would like city financial support and would like to enter
into a services agreement with the city. He introduced Mr.
.Ned Davis, who for nine years was Manager of the Petaluma
Chamber of Commerce, to answer questions.
In response to a question of what a taxpayer could expect
in r.-eturn for his tax dollars invested in the Cham ber of
Commerce, Mr. Davis replied that it was the responsibility
of an active Chamber of Commerce to bring dollars into the
community and that unless the city wants to depend on the
bedroom tax dollar, a fulltime person should be employed
to promote location of business and industry in Rohnert Park.
He noted that the City of San Leandro had lowered taxes each
Page -10- October 4, 1971
year for the last 20 years as a result of Chamber of
Commerce activities in attracting new business.
Mr. Cummings explained that $6,200 was being requested and
it was proposed that the Chamber report quarterly to the
city and if the proposed duties had not been fulfilled dur-
ing the preceding quarter the contract could be cancelled.
Discussion followed. In response to questioning Mr. Cumming3
replied that probably a fulltime secretary and a half -time
manager.would be employed initially.
City Manager Callinan suggested that perhaps the proposed
increase in business license fees could be allocated to
the Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Cummings pointed out the
Chamber does.not want a donation but proposes to perform
a service under contract to the city.
Mrs. Mary Gileck was recognized and stated that without
residents the city would be nothing.
Mr. Bart Mitchell suggested that two council members meet
with members of the Chamber of Commerce to work out a pro -
gram. Mr. Cummings replied that he would be delighted to
meet with a committee composed of Council members.
Mr. Jack Eddinger, Vice President ;of the Chamber of Commerce
and Manager of the Rohnert Park Branch of Exchange Bank,
stated that Rohnert Park is viewed as the hub of activity
in the next 10 years for population growth and believed the
city should develop a program through the Chamber of Commerce
before the regional shopping center is located here'a'd;
also that community relations should be improved, parti-
cularly with Sonoma State College, and thought the Chamber
of Commerce would be one of the best places to accomplish
this.
Discussion followed during which it was decided that Coun-
cilman Smith and Jack Buchanan would serve as the Council's
committee to meet with the Chamber of Commerce representa-
tives to pursue the matter.
East Cotati Avenue Mayor Jack Groom and City Manager Salfen of Cotati were pre-
Utility Service sent and discussed extending utility service to properties
on East Cotati Avenue with the Council.
Councilman Rogers declared a conflict of interest on dis-
cussion of the Holiday Park vault connection to the East
Cotati Avenue aqueduct but advised that he would participate
in discussion on policy matters
Mr. Harold Heers, developer of the Holiday Park Subdivision
in the area being discussed, appeared and offered his sugges-
tions on extending utility service to the area.
Discussion followed during which it was pointed out that
approximately 3.00 feet of parallel lines would be involved
if both Rohnert Park and Cotati installed utility service.
Page -11- October 4, 1971
Discussion followed concerning the best way to proceed.
In response to questioning, Mayor Jack Groom of Cotati
replied that the Cotati Council was definitely opposed to cue
annexing any part of Cotati. Discussion followed after whic}.
it was decided that since no de- annexation would take place,
staff should work out the best program possible to serve the
properties on East Cotati Avenue east of Adrian Drive..
Rohnert Park Golf Golf Professional Bob Porter reported to the Council on
Course various promotional activities at the golf course, golf
tournaments scheduled for the year and reported that he had
one of the most complete golf shops in Sonoma County which
also promoted play. Discussion followed concerning the de-
crease in August and September revenues compared to the same
period in 1970 and the possible causes for same.
Recess Mayor Hopkins declared a recess at this point in the meeting
the time being approximately 10:10 p.m.
Reconvene Mayor Hopkins reconvened the meeting at approximately
10:20 p.m.
Annual League of Councilman Smith reported on pending legislation discussed
California Cities at the Annual League of California Cities Conference held
Conference Report recently in San Francisco.
Mayor Hopkins reported that he had put in a bid to have the
January meeting of the Redwood Empire Division of the League
of California Cities in Rohnert Park, but would probably
not get it and discussed the possibility of holding the
April meeting in Rohnert Park. The Council indicated it
would favor having the April League meeting here.
Mayor Hopkins also noted that the police protection the city
is getting per dollar is outstanding and a representative
of at least one city had asked for a report on how it was
being done. The request had been relayed to Chief Dennett
for,handling.
Recycling Cans Councilman Rogers reported that he and City Manager Calli-
nan had represented Rohnert Park in San Francisco in con -
nection with a program being conducted jointly by the Rey-
nold Aluminum Co. and Redwood Empire Disposal to distribute
plastic bags to 100 homes in Rohnert Park for the collection
o"= recyclable aluminum cans on a trial basis.
Councilman Roberts noted that the local recycling center had
been .moved to the rear of the shopping center and expressed
ati.�r,ciation to press representatives present for publiciz-
±. new loci "--ion .
Stop Signs Ccuncilman Roberts commented on the possible need for stop
signs at the intersection of Bonnie Avenue and Adrian Drive.
Page -12-
'October 4, 1971
Motorcycle Noise Council ran Roberts commented that he had received complaints
of motorcycle noise.on.. .Anson Court.
Traffic Near HI Councilman Roberts reported that he had received numerous
School complaints of the.traffic bottleneck at Southwest Boulevard
and Snyder Lane near the high school in the morning.
Cable TV: Councilman Smith reported that federal legislation is being
considered that would require cable TV companies to` provide
a free channel for each school class, grades 1 12 and
free channels to police departments for remote coverage.
Fencing g Requirements City Manager Callinan distributed a draft of a proposed
resolution to provide for fencing requirements in residen-
tial areas and read same. Discussion followed.
Resolution No. 71 -129
Seismic Element
Study for General
Plan
Legacy of Parks;
RESOLUTION OUTLINING FENCING. - REQUIREMENTS IN RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICTS
Upcn motion of Councilman Buchanan, seconded by Councilman
Rogers, and ,unanimously approved, Resolution No. 71 -199
was adopted.
City Manager Callinan brought to the attention of the Coun-
cil a proposed seismic element study to.Be made by the City
of Santa Rosa and a request for cities'in the area to parti-
cipate and had indicated to Santa Rosa that Rohnert Park
would participate if the Council had no objections. None
were expressed by the Council.
City Manager Callinan reported that the grant for neighbor-
hood park development funds was going to take longer than
originally anticipated.
Telephone District Deputy City Attorney Mawson, after reviewing the PUC letter
Boundaries decisision not to change telephone district boundaries in
Rohnert Park, recommended that no formal complaint be filed,
but advised he would explore the possibility of having a
rate established for city government systems operated with -
in a city.
Sonoma Campus Company Mr. Alan Forsyth appeared and requested an indication from
Lots on Southwest the Councilmen as to whether or not they would insist on R -1
Blvd. File 0196 zoning for the lots, in Colegio Vista Subdivision No. 1
which were the subject of a rezoning application earlier in
the meeting. Councilmen. Roberts, Smith, and Hopkins indi-
cated they would.`Ynsist on R -1 zoning for said lots.
Adjournment
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned
at 10:45 p.m.
APPROVED:
_ ayor
Dep ty Cit Cher