Loading...
1989/03/28 City Council Minutes (3)Rohnert Park City Council Minutes March 28, 1989 4:00 p.m. The Council of the City of Rohnert Park met this date in adjourned regular session commencing at 4:00 p.m. at 6750 Commerce Blvd., Rohnert Park, with Mayor Cochran presiding. Call to Order The Council convened in the parking lot in front of the City Offices in order to view a new bus to be used on the local transit system. Roll Call Present: Councilmen Eck, Hollingsworth, Hopkins, Spiro and Mayor Cochran Absent: None Staff present for all or part of the meeting: City Manager Callinan and Director of Administrative Services Netter. New Buses The Council inspected the new Orion II bus that was on display in the City Offices parking lot which was brought down for inspection by representatives of the Sonoma County Transit System. After inspecting the bus and participating in ceremonial picture taking, the Council was given a short ride around the area in the new bus. Upon conclusion of the bus ride the Council convened in the City Council Chambers. Unscheduled Public Mayor Cochran asked if anyone in the audience desired to Appearances make an unscheduled public appearance. No one responded. Cable Television Mayor Cochran explained for the benefit of the audience the relationship of the City with Multivision. He mentioned the inability of the City to get invovled in setting cable rates as a result of federal IavI, i h i c h prohibits city involvement in same. He pointed out that according to Shearson Lehman, a stock broker firm, that an investment in cable systems is the best investment to make. He commented that Pacific Bell is not ready to discuss the possibility of replacing cable with a fibre optics system. He commented on an alternate system in Ukiah which is a voluntary system. He mentioned that cable franchises operate in most cities with no competition. Mr. Bryan Dwyer introduced himself, stating he lives at 802 Camino Colegio. He gave his explanation of the origination of cable systems and possible alternatives to same. He suggested that perhaps Rohnert Park could have a different system than it presently has. Discussion followed concerning costs of different systems, where they might, in fact, be in existence somewhere. Participating in the discussion was Pastor Chip Worthington. A wide ranging discussion concerning cable television was held with different speakers all giving their personal views as to their feelings towards the local cable system. Upon conclusion of discussions Mr. Dwyer indicated he would, in response to the City Council's request, submit a proposal for an alternate system to the franchised cable system, which proposal will be reviewed by the City Council and then scheduled for consideration. Stephen Troth, 5749 Davis Circle, expressed his annoyance with the fact that cable companies charge for additional outlets when the phone company only charges for one connection to a residence. It was suggested to him that he contact Congressman Bosco's office in view of the federal laws which limit the City's authority in regulating cable. Hertzel Harrison, 4413 Hamlet Court, gave 'a lengthy dissertation concerning his experience with Storer Cable during its rewiring in the city and his annoyance with the green pedestal boxes that are spread throughout the community. He reported on his discussions at the time with City Manager Callinan and representatives of the cable company. Pastor Chip Worthington expressed thanks to the City Council for being responsive to concerns expressed over the deletion of Channel 42 from the programs offered the community. He provided the Council with handouts concerning Channel 42, a copy of which is attached to the original set of these minutes. It was suggested file C ity Managei might appoint a staff member to look at Multivision's record keeping since Pastor Worthington indicated he didn't think they had very good records. George Horwedel, 7769 Camino Colegio, suggested that the Council form a citizens committee with two (2) Council members to renegotiate the contract with Multivision. He pointed out that encouraging antennas is not the answer since in many condo developments antennas are not authorized. Bob Vandercross of Executive Sound, a local business firm, made some comments and suggested that the City should negotiate and possibly consider alternatives to its arrangements with the cable company. He indicated the big cost is in the cable and its installation. He stated that cable companies have phenomenal profits. He said that the City should look at the other side of deregulation. He indicated that one city in Tennessee had condemned its sytem. Joan McCauley, 289 Burton Avenue, appeared and expressed her interest in getting Channel 42 restored. Councilman Hopkins made some comments relative to getting Channel 22 involved in any undertaking that the City pursues as an alternate to cable tv. Councilman Hollingsworth took exception to earlier remarks made by some of the speakers, especially that the City might have a conflict of interest and not want to fight with Multivision because the City gets a franchise fee, comments made about the City Manager not being committed to protecting the citizens' interests, and he indicated that the Council's interested in providing all the channels it can to all the citizens. He said if an alternative existed that was feasible its promoters would be beating the City's doors down. He said the City tried to get for the citizens all the city can from the cable company with the power the City has under federal law. He said the next step for citizens to consider is to solicit Congress to change the law. Council member Spiro suggsested that citizens should withdraw their services from the cable company and that might have some impact on the attitude of the company. A brief discussion was held concerning the green boxes that have sprouted versus underground vaults. Adjournment The adjourned regular session adjourned at approximately 5:30 p.m. `�_—C i ty Manager , C 1 erk Mayor