2015/09/08 City Council Resolution 2015-141RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - 141
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A THIRD ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE EASTSIDE TRUNK SEWER PHASE III
AND SNYDER LANE WIDENING PROJECT (PROJECT 2014 -01)
WHEREAS, an existing waterline on Snyder Lane will need to be relocated; and
WHEREAS, the relocated waterline will be hung onto the side of the Copeland Creek
Bridge; and
WHEREAS, the City prepared and approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration ( "MND ")
for the Eastside Trunk Sewer Project, with included the widening of Snyder Lane from East
Cotati Avenue north to Jasmine Circle environmental document has been prepared and approved
on the Mitigated Negative Declaration level; and
WHEREAS, the MND does not address the relocated waterline, but the relocated
waterline would be located within the Project's footprint and construction boundary; and
WHEREAS, an addendum to an adopted MND can be prepared for minor changes to the
project; and
WHEREAS, hanging the relocated waterline from Copeland Creek Bridge would be a
minor change, would not involve new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified environmental effects, and thus appropriate for analysis
through an addendum to the earlier MND; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert
Park as follows:
A California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration
was prepared for the project on April 28, 2006 and the Notice of Determination was filed
for the project with the Sonoma County Clerk on August 11, 2006. An Addendum to the
Adopted 2006 Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved on February 9, 2007 to
include Snyder Lane Widening. A second Addendum to the Adopted 2006 Mitigated
Negative Declaration was approved on April 28, 2015 to address small modifications to
the project that were made during final design. This third Addendum has been prepared
to address the minor change to the project resulting from hanging the relocated waterline
from the Copeland Creek Bridge. The Council has determined, based on substantial
evidence in the record, that the Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase 3 and Snyder Lane Widening
Project was fully analyzed and approved in the aforementioned MND, NOD, First
Addendum, and Second Addendum. This is a subsequent action in furtherance of the
approved project and no further environmental review is required. Pursuant to CEQA
1
2015-
Guidelines Section 15162, the Council finds that (1) no substantial changes are proposed
to the project; (2) no significant new environmental effects and no substantial increase in
severity of previously identified effects will occur; (3) no new information of substantial
importance shows that the project will have new significant or more severe effects; (4) no
previously identified mitigation measures or alternatives have become feasible; and (5)
no different mitigation measures or alternatives would substantially reduce a significant
effect on the environment.
2. The Third Addendum to the Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration, attached to the
Staff Report as Attachment B and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved
and adopted.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 81h day of September, 2015.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Amy O. Ahanotu, Mayor
ATTEST:
CA Gli,
oAnne M. Buergler, City Clerk
Attachment: Third Addendum to the Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration
CALLINAN: MACKENZIE: *"4'V STAFFORD: J BELFORTE:
AYES: ( ) NOES: ( 0 ) ABSENT: ( 0 ) ABSTAIN
2
2015-
AHANOTU:
Memorandum
August 12, 2015
To: Mary Grace Pawson and Artur da Rosa, City of Rohnert Park
From: GHD Inc. Tel: 707 - 523 -1010
Subject: Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase 3 /Snyder Lane Widening Phase 1 CEQA Addendum
Introduction and Summary
In 2006, an Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS /MND) (State Clearinghouse No. 2006042169)
was prepared for the City of Rohnert Park's (City) Eastside Trunk Sewer (ESTS) Project, which included
the widening of Snyder Lane from East Cotati Avenue north to Jasmine Circle. The City Council adopted
the MND at its noticed public hearing on July 11, 2006 (referred to herein as the "adopted 2006 MND ").
Subsequent to the adoption of the MND, the City opted to extend the widening of Snyder Lane north from
Jasmine Circle to Medical Center Drive. This additional Project activity included improvements to all four
legs of Snyder Lane's intersection with Rohnert Park Expressway. These activities were reviewed
pursuant to CEQA in an addendum to the adopted 2006 MND. That addendum was adopted by the City
on February 9, 2007 (i.e., 2007 Addendum). A second addendum was adopted in April 2015 (i.e., April
2015 Addendum), which addressed changes to the initial project and those reviewed in the 2007
Addendum, including improvements to the Snyder Lane bridge headwalls on the west side; widening of
Snyder Lane from Medical Center Drive to Parkway Drive; revised design of the ingress /egress at the
Rancho Cotate High School Parking lot; and inclusion of a PG &E natural gas /electrical utility
undergrounding project.
The City is now proposing to relocate an existing 8 -inch water line as part of the ESTS Project (see
Appendix A for design plan sheets). While this would not increase the Project's footprint or construction
area boundary, this was not contemplated in the adopted 2006 MND or subsequent Addenda.
Additionally, a portion of the relocated water line would be located within federal and State resource
agency jurisdiction. Therefore, the City has opted to prepare this Addendum to the adopted 2006 MND to
analyze relocation of the water line pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), as discussed below.
Applicability and Use of an Addendum
The City has prepared this Addendum in accordance with Sections 15162, 15164, and 15074.1 of the
CEQA Guidelines. The purpose of this Addendum is to revise technical information resulting from
modifications to the Project and to revise mitigation measures.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 provides that an addendum is the appropriate level of CEQA analysis
when the circumstances defined in Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent
GHD Inc.
2235 Mercury Way Suite 150 Santa Rosa CA 95407 USA
T 1 707 523 1010 F 1 707 527 8679 E santarosa @ghd.com W www.ghd.com
MND do not occur. An addendum to an adopted MND may be prepared only if minor technical changes or
additions are necessary and none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for a subsequent
MND have occurred.
The change in environmental impacts due to the modified Project has been evaluated and measured
against the standards set forth CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 to determine whether an addendum is
appropriate or a subsequent MND is needed. The environmental analysis provided herein provides an
examination of each of the CEQA resource issues. The conclusion is that none of the circumstances that
would require a subsequent or supplemental MND is evident. Therefore, an addendum is the appropriate
level of CEQA analysis and is the appropriate method of amending the MND adopted by the City in 2006.
Through the analysis provided herein, the City has shown that the mitigation measures provided on the
Project's adopted 2006 MND would sufficiently address the modified elements of the ESTS Project
discussed in this Addendum. This Addendum should be read together with the full text of the adopted
2006 MND, the 2007 Addendum, and the April 2015 Addendum for the ESTS Project. Even though
modifications to the approved Project are minor, the modifications have been subjected to a detailed
analytical process consistent with the 2006 MND.
Project Description
The City is proposing to relocate approximately 3,500 linear feet (LF) of an existing buried 8 -inch water
line approximately 4 feet to the east along Snyder Lane from Southwest Boulevard to Parkway Drive. The
majority of the relocated water line would be buried within Snyder Lane, with a slight encroachment into
the banks of Copeland Creek. Approximately 70 LF of the water line would daylight to cross the existing
Copeland Creek Bridge via new pipe supports installed along the west side of the bridge. The existing 8-
inch water line would be abandoned in place. Design and construction would comply with the California
Department of Health Standards for potable water lines. Please refer to Appendix A for illustrations of the
relocated water line.
The relocated water line would be installed within the same construction area boundary identified in the
adopted 2006 MND and subsequent Addenda. Installation of the water line along the bridge would occur
from the bridge /roadway and would not require in- channel disturbance. No additional disturbance would
occur to the Snyder Lane roadway, sidewalks, and the banks of Copeland Creek beyond that
contemplated in the 2006 MND and subsequent Addenda. No additional trees would be removed.
Construction would occur within the time frame identified in Section 3.2.5 of the April 2015 Addendum.
The new water line would be installed via open trench construction, with a trench approximately 2 feet
wide and 5 feet deep. Open trench construction methods would be similar to that described for other
trenched components of the Project. Please refer to the discussion of "Open Trench Installation" on
pages 8 and 9 of the adopted 2006 MND for a description of these construction activities.
Construction equipment would be parked or staged on a previously used construction staging area north
of the creek on the west side of Snyder Lane, as described in the April 2015 Addendum. No staging areas
E
would be placed in areas that may affect any riparian corridors or waters of the US or wetlands. If staging
areas are placed in non -paved areas, they would not be used for more than one construction season and
associated impacts would therefore be temporary in nature.
Approvals Requested or Required
Relocation of the water line would not change the scope of the Project's current resource permitting effort.
Required agency approvals are presented in Section 10 of the adopted 2006 MND.
Environmental Analysis
The City's adopted 2006 MND, 2007 Addendum, and April 2015 Addendum evaluated the environmental
issues included in the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist present during that time and adopted by
the City. These issues, plus those subsequently added to the Appendix G checklist (e.g., Forestry
Resources) are re- evaluated in this Addendum for the proposed water line relocation. This evaluation
identifies whether, with the proposed modification of the ESTS Project, any new significant impacts or
substantially more severe impacts would occur beyond those identified in the prior documents. All
mitigation measures identified in the adopted 2006 MND, 2007 Addendum, and April 2015 Addendum
were incorporated into the project's Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) and adopted by the City. The
MMP mitigation measures also apply to the water line relocation evaluated in this Addendum and are
attached as Appendix B.
The environmental analysis of the potential impacts of the proposed water line relocation is described as
follows.
Aesthetics
The majority of the relocated water line would be buried under Snyder Lane and not visible, with
the exception of minor surficial appurtenances (e.g., valves, meters, etc.). Approximately 70 LF of
the water line would be affixed to the west side of the bridge, at approximately the same elevation
as the roadway. Therefore, it would be visible to pedestrians using the Copeland Creek trails.
However, when viewed with the bridge, the presence of the water line would not alter the existing
visual landscape. The impact would be less than significant and no new impacts have been
identified.
Agricultural and Forestry Resources, Mineral Resources, Public Services, Population and
Housing, and Recreation
The water line relocation is located along Snyder Lane; it would not impact agricultural or forested
lands, result in the loss of mineral resources, induce population growth, increase the need for
public services, displace homes or people, or deteriorate or require construction of new
recreational facilities. The Project area is not located on agricultural or forested lands and is not
located in a mineral resource recovery area or at a recreational facility. The relocated water line
would not be increased in size and, therefore, would not expand water service such that it would
3
induce population growth. Therefore, the Project would not increase demand for public services,
recreational facilities, or housing. No new impacts would occur.
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Construction activities associated with water line relocation would be similar to those indicated in
the adopted 2006 MND and subsequent Addenda, involving temporary emissions of reactive
organic gases (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulates less than 10 microns in size (PM,o),
and particulates less than 2.5 microns in size (PM2.5) from the use of construction equipment and
vehicles. The modifications would not involve any new types of air emissions, contaminants, or
odors as the construction methods and operations would be unchanged. The water line relocation
would cause a very small increase in emissions over the projected overall two -year construction
duration. Implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -1 and AIR -2 would continue to mitigate
these potential impacts to a less- than - significant level. Air quality impacts attributable to the
relocated water line would not create new significant impacts, impacts of substantially greater
severity, or the need for additional mitigation measures.
The water line relocation would not be in conflict with any adopted policies in the City of Rohnert
Park's General Plan that support the reduction of GHG emissions, nor would it conflict with AB32
or its governing regulations. As indicated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3), there is no
need to recirculate the MND due to GHG impacts, even though the MND did not evaluate GHG
per se, because GHG issues were clearly known in 2006 and the MND and 2007 Addendum
were adopted without such an evaluation. Therefore, this Addendum is the appropriate document
to evaluate the GHG impacts of the water line relocation.
Biological Resources
In February 2015 (for the April 2015 Addendum), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's
(CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services'
( USFWS) species list were consulted for potential records of special- status plant and animal
species in the vicinity of the proposed Project. The results of the searches did not indicate a
change from the information presented in the adopted 2006 MND and 2007 Addendum (CDFW
2015; USFWS 2015). In addition, no species- status plant species would potentially be affected by
the modifications, as there is no habitat for rare plants. The water line relocation would not involve
any new potential impacts on wetlands or waters not already anticipated for the Project because it
is located within or along Snyder Lane, is within the previously evaluated construction area
boundary, and would not require disturbance to the channel (as all work would be performed from
the creek banks or from the bridge). Mitigation Measures BIO -1, BIO -3, and BIO -5 would continue
to mitigate for temporary disturbances to the banks of Copeland Creek and nesting birds from the
ESTS Project including water line relocation. No additional trees would be removed for the water
line relocation. Other mitigation measures included in the adopted 2006 MND to protect biological
resources would still be applicable during construction of the ESTS Project. Any potential
4
biological resource impacts attributable to the proposed water line relocation would not create
new significant impacts, impacts of substantially greater severity, or the need for additional
mitigation measures.
Cultural Resources
The potential impacts on documented and undocumented cultural resources in the Project vicinity
were analyzed in the adopted 2006 MND. The file search did not reveal any known or potential
cultural resources within the project limits. This was verified for the April 2015 Addendum, which
covered an expanded Project area (NWIC 2015). Because the water line relocation does not
extend the horizontal or vertical area of disturbance, no new disturbance to a known cultural or
paleontological resource would occur. Mitigation Measures CR -1, CR -2, and CR -3 would
continue to apply by providing archaeological monitoring and treatment of unanticipated finds
during construction, including at staging areas. Potential cultural resource impacts attributable to
the proposed water line relocation would not create new significant impacts, impacts of
substantially greater severity, or the need for additional mitigation measures.
Geology and Soils
The relocated water line would be located entirely within areas previously studied in the 2006
MND and subsequent Addenda. There would be no new seismic or instability risks or erosion
potential, since the proposed construction activities would be the same as those analyzed in the
adopted 2006 MND and subsequent Addenda, and in the previously studied area. The water line
would be designed and constructed in compliance with applicable regulations in the Uniform
Building Code (UBC) and the recommendations of the 2014 geotechnical study prepared for the
Project (RGH Consultants 2014). The risk of severe ground shaking, liquefaction, or seismically -
induced landslides is considered less than significant, as application of the UBC would reduce
risks as much as feasible in a seismically active area. Application of Mitigation Measure GEO -1
would also reduce any additional erosion risks during open trench construction to a less -than-
significant level. Any potential geologic or soil impacts attributable to the water line relocation
would not create new significant impacts, impacts of substantially greater severity, or the need for
additional mitigation measures.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The proposed water line relocation would occur entirely in the area previously surveyed for the
adopted 2006 MND and subsequent Addenda. A search of the Cortese list and associated files
maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board was conducted for the April 2015
Addendum; this file search did not reveal any known hazardous material incident reports or
known or potential sites recorded since 2007 within the expanded project limits (Cal EPA 2011;
DTSC 2015; SWRCB 2015a, 2015b, 2015c). Therefore, the water line relocation is not
anticipated to involve any disturbance to a known hazardous material site or create a new hazard.
Mitigation Measures HAZ -1, HAZ -2, HAZ -3, and HAZ -5 addressing hazards and hazardous
5
materials would remain in force and reduce any potential impacts to a less- than - significant level.
Also, construction in Snyder Lane would alter travel patterns in that area and could affect
emergency vehicle access. Mitigation Measure HAZ -4 would reduce any potential adverse effects
to a less- than - significant level. Any potential hazards impacts attributable to the water line
relocation would not create new significant impacts, impacts of substantially greater severity, or
the need for additional mitigation measures.
Hydrology and Water Quality
Water line relocation would not change the nature of water quality or groundwater impacts or
significantly alter drainage patterns in the area, since the type of proposed construction activities
and future use would be the same as analyzed in the adopted 2006 MND and subsequent
Addenda. The water line relocation would not require in- channel work; all work would be
performed from the creek banks or from the bridge itself. No new impervious surface is proposed
beyond that contemplated in previous evaluations. Mitigation Measures GEO -1 and HAZ -2 would
reduce any potential impacts to hydrology and water quality from open trenching or disturbance to
the creek bank to a less- than - significant level. Any potential hydrologic or water quality impacts
attributable to water line relocation would not create new significant impacts, impacts of
substantially greater severity, or the need for additional mitigation measures.
Land Use and Planning
The relocated water line would be constructed within the public right -of -way. Potable water
pipelines are ancillary public utility uses conditionally allowed within zoning and land use
designations. Therefore, the proposed Project modification would not conflict with land use plans
or policies. There are no applicable conservation plans or natural community conservation plans
covering this area. The relocated water line would not add components that would physically
divide any established communities. The relocated water line would not involve any new
community or land use impacts beyond those analyzed in the adopted 2006 MND, 2007
Addendum, and April 2015 Addendum.
Noise
The water line relocation would not require revisions to the evaluation of potential noise impacts,
as the associated construction activities would be similar in nature to those previously analysed
and within the same construction area boundary. Temporary increases in noise levels from
construction activities were identified and analyzed in the adopted 2006 MND and subsequent
Addenda. Mitigation Measures N0I -1, N0I -2, N0I -3, and N0I -4 presented in the original noise
analysis would remain valid and reduce any potential impacts to a less- than - significant level,
including potential impacts to Rancho Cotate High School in the vicinity of the water line
relocation. Noise impacts attributable to the water line relocation would not create new significant
impacts, impacts of substantially greater severity, or the need for additional mitigation measures.
I
Transportation /Traffic
Relocation of the water line would occur along Snyder Lane. This, along with other Project
components evaluated in the adopted 2006 MND and subsequent Addenda would disrupt
circulation along Snyder Lane, including vehicular traffic, public transit, and bicycle and
pedestrian traffic, including school - related traffic. However, to avoid additional impact, the
installation of the water line is being planned to coincide with the other work currently disrupting
travel on Snyder Lane. The adopted 2006 MND included the development of a Traffic Control
Plan that requires detour routes for public transit services. The MND also included Mitigation
Measure TR -1 to coordinate construction - related traffic with local schools. The amount of
temporary construction - related traffic would remain the same as analyzed in the adopted 2006
MND and subsequent Addenda. Therefore, the water line relocation would not create new
significant impacts, impacts of substantially greater severity, or the need for new mitigation
measures.
Utilities and Service Systems
The Project modification evaluated in this Addendum includes the relocation of approximately
3,500 LF of an existing water line. No modifications to other utility lines are proposed that have
not already been considered in the previous CEQA analyses for the Project. Because no other
changes would occur to sanitary sewer lines or storm drain facilities, the Project modification
would not result in additional impacts to wastewater treatment facilities or storm water drainage
facilities beyond that contemplated in the adopted 2006 MND and subsequent Addenda. The new
water line would be the same size as the existing water line (i.e., 8- inches in diameter) and,
therefore, would continue to offer the same level of service as existing conditions. No new
housing or other development is proposed and, therefore, new or expanded entitlements for
water supplies are not required. Construction methods would remain unchanged from that
considered in the adopted 2006 MND and subsequent Addenda. While the total volume of solid
waste may increase incrementally with this Project modification, minimal construction debris
would be generated by the Project and would be minimized per BMPs set forth in the Project's
SWPPP.
Mandatory Findings of Significance
The water line relocation would not substantially change the proposed Project design from that
analyzed in the adopted 2006 MND, 2007 Addendum, or April 2015 Addendum. As modified, the
ESTS Project would still allow the City to meet projected development demands presented and
analyzed in the City's General Plan and General Plan EIR. A review of the City's development
permit files did not reveal additional projects which would occur concurrent with this Project
generating new cumulative impacts. The modified Project's impacts would not add appreciably to
any existing or foreseeable future significant cumulative impact, such as species endangerment,
7
habitat loss, or air quality degradation. Incremental impacts, if any, would be very small and
negligible.
The proposed modification to the Project would not require revisions to the evaluation of
Mandatory Findings of Significance. The modifications would not involve any new impacts,
impacts of greater severity or require additional mitigation measures, or result in cumulatively
considerable effects or substantially adverse effects.
References
California Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Cortese List: Section 65962.5(a).
http: / /www.calepa.ca. gov / SiteCleanup /CorteseList/SectionA.htm #Facilities. Accessed on
February 23, 2015.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2015. California Natural Diversity Database. Reviewed
February 23.
California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2015. EnviroStor. Hazardous Waste and Substances
Site List. http: / /www.dtsc.ca. gov /SiteCleanup /Cortese_List.cfm. Accessed on February 23.
Northwest Information Center (NWIC), California Historical Resources Information System. 2015. Record
Search Results for the proposed Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase 3- Snyder Lane Road Widening
Phase 1 Project. NWIC File No. 14 -1099. February 25.
RGH Consultants. 2014. Geotechnical Study Report, Snyder Lane Widening. June 4.
Rohnert Park, City of. 2006. Draft Initial Study / Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Eastside
Trunk Sewer Project. Adopted July 11. Prepared by Winzler & Kelly.
. 2007. Addendum to the Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration, Eastside Trunk Sewer
Project (Improvements to the Intersection of Rohnert Park Expressway & Snyder Lane. Adopted
February 9. Prepared by Winzler & Kelly.
State Water Resources Quality Control Board (SWRQCB). 2015a. "Active" CDO and CAO.
http: / /www.calepa.ca. gov / SiteCleanup /CorteseList /CDOCAOList.xlsx. Accessed February 23.
. 2015b. Sites Identified with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels Outside
the Waste Management Unit. http: / /www.calepa.ca. gov / SiteCleanup /CorteseList/CurrentList.pdf.
Accessed on February 23.
. 2015c. Geotracker. https:// geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov /. Accessed on February 23.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Federal Endangered and Threatened Species that Occur or May Be
Affected by Projects. Cotati Quad and Sonoma County lists. Reviewed February 23.
�:3
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Water Line Relocation Plan Sheets U106 and U405
R
N < 11
w
-o
LOLn 133HS 336 8 8 a 9 8
00 +9C VIS 3NII HOiVVq - - - - - - - - - - - - 8
rco
p
7
j
o i
M.8
-W-.8 (3) vOi
(dObG) TL 90L ANI.9(3)
99�00L ANI jVZ (N)
VS 9 , �U
V9 _ 9H, AM
8.
HASS
ASS
OZ SOL ANI
�2
>
o
33�30
dN1713—db-
89 '80t ANI
as Bo
z
'6 (NVBV9901)-9 .9 ��
iRi
ZMLANI.WN)
L9 LU AN1.0e (N)
Wo zzFLV# HASS
Mast t37—
iv
u- >
1bg.� $� Ro
z
o
0
�Z- z< o.
N
No
°a II Z6< o.
-o
<
< ... 1, U U o.lo
Z.
X,
Oo T o
45
t's INS
1-1v 1 SS.9
tz;
w
z M.9 N
ANI
N-g�
dliu.8,(.)oi D3N 00
< dou.s, (3)
..........
965" Ala
Ctfta38180%(N)
< s
I ' a o. TO UtANI XL
t; > - I I I i � I
dOH .91(N) 011OBNNOO
z w dDid.gl (N)
I , 5 m L
UH HAM N)
N
<
U)
T
:S I II VIP> Im
w
-Z
o
LS 3NII 1131VIN 2 g 8 9 9 8
g (D
9 - - N
o�
il p
91 il
fi
O
_J
10
0
O
' II
1
IAA
a -
O LL
wz
o
Z
WI W
oof
CSC)
I
I
t
�o
Od
�O
M9
9S,Rl
J
L
_ Mb -9t
W
L]
IM
I �
I
I
I
m
Q
�Nn
1 U¢�
Qj wz
r� LLO
11
C.
g I PII
INNII
W zo
z J,LL Z
O '
F W Q J F
6
�q
k�
�N
pO d b
alI s
m
I
I
�
O
rcaiwa
2� w
'o
M
¢
U
z� r
aH5
3r
-
O
pc�mo,n
o8 _
m
I
-yaa
Ho �
U
�° I
a a
Sr
N
UUoOUS¢
OFZ�Na
�
tia ��
C7
2
o
�o
>o
ss .ul
a S
�U
m
Va
F Z
¢w
I
I
I
j
O �
<
2
O
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
�o
I
I
t
�o
Od
�O
M9
9S,Rl
J
L
_ Mb -9t
W
L]
IM
I �
I
I
I
m
Q
�Nn
1 U¢�
Qj wz
r� LLO
11
C.
g I PII
INNII
W zo
z J,LL Z
O '
F W Q J F
6
�q
k�
�N
pO d b
alI s
z
Z
-
O
L)
U
W
C7
2
m
O
a
Appendix B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
m
'o
L
a
L
d
3
m
s
_
3
L
d
.y
W
W
i
L
IL
t
0
s
0
w
0
a
_
�o
C
0
im
_
0
Cad
G
r
a
d
a
U)
ca
s
a
U
N
O
a.
U)
W
0
0
N
Q
Q
0
00
U)
m
L
a
)
0
d
a
m
L
d
U
N
O
a`
F-
w
a
x
Q
U)
co
r
IL
U
N
O
CL
I
0
CD
00
U)
U
N
O
n
U)
U)
w
r
Q
rn
m
0
v
ro
ro
m
t
CL
1
U
N
O
IL
0
2
Q
a
m
L
n.
U
U7
O
�7
0
Q
m
s
a
I
U
N
O
d
F
W
2
C7