The URL can be used to link to this page

2016/11/22 City Council Agenda PacketMission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community/or Today and Tomorrow." City of Rohnert Park ♦ 130 Avram Avenue ♦ Rohnert Park, California 94928 PHONE: (707) 588-2227+ FAX: (707) 794-9248 ♦ WEB: www.rpcity.org ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL Rohnert Park Financing Authority (RPFA) Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC) JOINT REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 22, 2016 Open Session: 5:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBER 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California The Rohnert Park City Council welcomes your attendance, interest and participation at its regular city meetings scheduled on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. City Council/RPFA agendas and minutes may be viewed at the City's website: www.rpciiy.org. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Council/RPFA may discuss and/or take action on any or all of the items listed on this agenda. If you challenge decisions of the City Council or the Rohnert Park Financing Authority of the City of Rohnert Park in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearing(s) described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Rohnert Park at, or prior to the public hearing(s). RIGHT TO APPEAL: Judicial review of any city administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5 may be had only if a petition is filed with the court no later than the deadlines specified in Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, which generally limits the time within which the decision may be challenged to the 90th day following the date that the decision becomes final. SIMULTANEOUS MEETING COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE (Government Code § 54952.3): Members of the City Council receive no additional compensation as a result of convening this joint meeting of the City Council and the Rohnert Park Financing Authority. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Provides an opportunity for public comment on items not listed on the agenda, or on agenda items if unable to comment at the scheduled time (limited to three minutes per appearance and a 30 minute total time limit, or allocation of time determined by Presiding Officer based on number of speaker cards submitted). PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING ANNOUNCEMENT: Please turn off all pagers, cellular telephones and all other communication devices upon entering the Council Chamber. Use of these devices causes electrical interference with the sound recording and TV broadcast systems. City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Agenda November 22, 2016 for City Council/RPFA/CDC Successor Agency Page 2 of 6 1. CITY COUNCIL/RPFA/SUCCESSOR AGENCY JOINT REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL (Ahanotu _ Callinan Stafford _ Mackenzie _ Belforte 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PRESENTATIONS 4. DEPARTMENT HEAD BRIEFING A. Community Services: November 25th -26th Arts & Crafts Faire Update 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item or on City business not listed on the Agenda may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes. Those wishing to address the Council on any report item listed on the Agenda should submit a "Speaker Card" to the City Clerk before announcement of that agenda item. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the Consent Calendar will be considered together by one or more action(s) of the City Council and/or the Rohnert Park Financing Authority and Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission, whichever is applicable, unless any Council Member or anyone else interested in a consent calendar item has a question about the item. A. Approval of Minutes for: 1. City CounC1URPFA/Successor Agency Joint Regular Meeting, November 8, 2016 B. Acceptance of Reports for: 1. City Bills/Demands for Payment dated November 22, 2016 2. Successor Agency to the CDC Bills/Demands for Payment dated November 22, 2016 C. City Council Resolutions for Adoption: 1. 2016-110 Approving a Six -Month Extension of Temporary Debris Box and Roll -Off Collection Services Franchise Agreements with Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting and Authorizing the City Manager to Send Notices of Intent to Extend Agreements 2. 2016-111 Approving a Third Amendment to the Agreement for Purchase and Sale Between the City and Stadium RP Development Partners, LLC, Regarding the Sale of the Property Known As Stadium Lands D. Ordinances for Adoption: No. 901 An Ordinance of the City Council of Rohnert Park, California, Amending Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) of the City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Agenda November 22, 2016 for City Council/RPFA/CDC Successor Agency Page 3 of 6 Zoning Ordinance to Adopt Development Standards for the Priority Development Area Plan 2. No. 902 An Ordinance of the City of Rohnert Park Adopting the 2016 California Building Standards Code by Reference, as Amended to Reflect Local Conditions, and Repealing Chapters 15.04 Through 15.30 and 15.36 of Title 15 "Buildings and Construction" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code and Adding Section 15.04 (General Provisions and Penalties), 15.08 (Building Code), 15.12 (Residential Code), 15.16 (Electrical Code), 15.18 (Mechanical Code) 15.20 (Plumbing Code), 15.22 (Energy Code) 15.24 (Existing Building Code), 15.26 (Green Building Standards Code) 15.28 (Fire Code), and 15.30 (Administrative Citations for Fireworks) to Title 15 "Buildings and Construction" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code E. Approval of Cancellation of Regular City Council Meeting Scheduled for December 27, 2016 Due to the Holiday Season F. City Council Confirmation of Mayor Belforte's Nomination of Paul Libeu for Appointment as the City's Representative to the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District for a Four -Year Term Expiring December 31, 2020 Council Motion/Roll Call Vote (Ahanotu _ Callinan_ Stafford _ Mackenzie _ Belforte 7. Discussion and Direction on Partnering with the County of Sonoma on Railroad Quiet Zones that Include the City of Rohnert Park A. Staff Report B. Public Comments C. Council discussion/direction 8. Discussion and Direction on Proposed Community Center Digital Sign Design and Use Policy A. Staff Report B. Public Comments C. Council discussion/direction 9. Selection of City Council Officers for 2017 — Consideration of Nomination and Selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor A. Selection of Mayor Public Comments Council motion/discussion/vote B. Selection of Mayor Pro Tempore (Vice Mayor) Public Comments Council motion/discussion/vote City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Agenda November 22, 2016 for City Council/RPFA/CDCSuccessor Agency Page 4 of 6 10. PUBLIC HEARING (NO EARLIER THAN 6PM) Consideration of a Resolution Establishing and Setting a Schedule for Water Capacity Charges Under the Mitigation Fee Act (Exempt from CEQA Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)) A. Staff Report B. Public Comments C. Resolution for Adoption: 2016-112 Establishing and Setting a Schedule for Water Capacity Charges Under the Mitigation Fee Act a. Council motion/discussion/vote 11. Discussion and Direction of a Potential Update of the City Council Protocols (the Established Procedural Rules for the Conduct of City Council Meetings and Council Business) A. Staff Report B. Public Comments C. Council discussion/direction 12. CITY COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, AND BOARD APPOINTMENTS A. Report of Appointments to City Commissions, Committees, and Boards — Terms Expiring December 31, 2018 1. Staff Report 2. Public Comments 3. Council discussion/receive report B. City Council Appointments to the Planning Commission — Terms Expiring December 31, 2018 1. Staff Report 2. Public Comments 3. Council motion/discussion/vote 13. COMMITTEE / LIAISON / OTHER REPORTS This time is set aside to allow Council members serving on Council committees or on regional boards, commissions or committees to present a verbal report on the activities of the respective boards, commissions or committees on which they serve. No action may be taken. A. Standing Committee Reports B. Liaison Reports 1. Chamber of Commerce (Board of Directors) (11/15) 2. Association of Bay Area Government (ABAG) General Assembly (11/17) 3. Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA) (11/14) C. Other Reports City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Agenda November 22, 2016 for City Council/RPFAICDC Successor Agency Page 5 of 6 14. COMMUNICATIONS Copies of communications have been provided to Council for review prior to this meeting. Council Members desiring to read or discuss any communication may do so at this time. No action may be taken except to place a particular item on a future agenda for Council consideration. 15. MATTERS FROM/FOR COUNCIL Prior to agenda publication, any Councilmember may place an item on this portion of the agenda. Upon the concurrence of two Councilmembers, the item may be added to a subsequent agenda for deliberation and action. In accordance with the Brown Act, at the City Council meeting, Councilmembers may not add items hereunder, except for brief reports on his or her own activities or brief announcements regarding an event of community interest. A. Sonoma County Cannabis Regulations 16. PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons wishing to address the Council on City business not listed on the Agenda may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes. Those wishing to address the Council on any report item listed on the Agenda should submit a "Speaker Card" to the City Clerk before announcement of that agenda item. 17. CLOSED SESSION A. Recess to Closed Session in Conference Room 2A to Consider: 1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code §54957.6) Agency designated representative(s): Darrin Jenkins, City Manager Employee Organizations: a. Service Employees' International Union (SEIU) b. Rohnert Park Employees' Association (RPEA) c. Rohnert Park Public Safety Officers' Association (RPPSOA) d. Rohnert Park Public Safety Managers' Association (RPPSMA) e. Management Unit f. Confidential Unit g. Unrepresented Employees 2. Conference with Legal Counsel — Anticipated Litigation — Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(4): (One Case) B. Reconvene Joint Regular Meeting Open Session in Council Chamber C. Report On Closed Session (Government Code § 54957.1) 18. ADJOURNMENT City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Agenda November 22, 2016 for City Council/RPFA/CDC Successor Agency Page 6 of 6 NOTE: Time shown for any particular matter on the agenda is an estimate only. Matters may be considered earlier or later than the time indicated depending on the pace at which the meeting proceeds. If you wish to speak on an item under discussion by the Council which appears on this agenda, after receiving recognition from the Mayor, please walk to the rostrum and state your name and address for the record. Any item raised by a member of the public which is not on the agenda and may require Council action shall be automatically referred to staff for investigation and disposition which may include placing on a future agenda. If the item is deemed to be an emergency or the need to take action arose after posting of the agenda within the meaning of Government Code Section 54954.2(b), Council is entitled to discuss the matter to determine if it is an emergency item under said Government Code and may take action thereon. DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (707) 588-2227 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation by the City. Please notify the City Clerk's Office as soon as possible if you have a visual impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another format (Braille, audio -tape, etc.) AGENDA REPORTS & DOCUMENTS: Copies of all staff reports and documents subject to disclosure that relate to each item of business referred to on the agenda are available for public inspection at City Hall located at 130 Avram Avenue, during regular business hours, Monday through Friday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. Any writings or documents subject to disclosure that are provided to all, or a majority of all, of the members of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda has been distributed will also be made available for inspection at City Hall during regular business hours. CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA I, Caitlin Saldanha, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Rohnert Park, declare that the foregoing agenda for the November 22, 2016, Joint Regular Meeting of the Rohnert Park City Council/RPFA was posted and available for review on November 17, 2016, at Rohnert Park City Hall, 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California 94928. The agenda is also available on the City web site at www.ri)city.org, Executed this 17' day of November, 2016, at Rohnert Park, California. Caitlin Saldanha, Deputy City Clerk Stormwater Educat1@ ion and Outreach Pro1% grams qaxts because every cboice matters r91 Daily Acts "You must be the change you want to see in the world" it I ahatrica Gandhi 1. � j Our Partners Stormwater & Weser Conservation Education Programs: • City of Petaluma since 2007 • City of Cotati since 2009 • Town of Windsor since 2010 • City of Healdsburg in 2015 Model ite Development & Stewc- • CR y of Sebastopol since 2013 Bywater Programs: 04, • City of Cloverdale in 2014 City of Santa Rosa in 2016 99 munity Action Campaigns & Sustainability Tours: Sonoma C&nty Water Agency / Russian River Watershed Association 0 Slow it, Spread it, Sink it, and Store it! r TORMW Problem or obi PAVE IF + SL 0 W P1PEiT ME.A POLL -UTE IT INK f -1111111111116 '- •A www.oaecwater.org 0 I. NEW its a 'INN rad Lancaster tiJ X- �Inwater.corn@20C-18 Brad Lancaster 5 Reasons to Harvest the Rain 1. Emergency Preparedness 2. Saves Money 3. Recharges Groundwater 4. Flushes Soil Salts 5. r Plants Love Rainwater! A I r] 99 MMO Prepare Your Sponge with Mulch 1- 99 Spread and Sink with Swales Y Retain with Rain Barrels gutter residential rain garden (keep 10 feet away from most structures) {rock/vegetated- native plants absorb Swale or pipe runoff and pollutants while attracting songbirds ' % ycY, ° overflow structure and butterflies Al I root zone aids in nutrient uptake, microbial activity, t _ and infiltration — t # gravel bed (if needed) ponding zone allows pollutants perforated , o settle and organic matter to cug Pipe to outlet mulate r (if needed) `�µJI;�. Increase Permeable Surfaces i 'Copeland Creek Revival' Anew model for Rohnert Park n d i L R fr+ '*pw. � .�', •r'. soppp 7et Clean U Ty the Creer! 4 4or .T1 1p -"qqq CON5MATION HYDROLOGY: ADAPTJNG GURWATER FOOTPRINT tQM�Z(MON WoJARDS ]REGEA RAT IVE REHYDRATM4 &0& W -6N RECEIVE. voN ECHARG SLOW IT SPREAM 51NK IT WATERSHED AWARENESS D OKI L IV [WROJil iT L TRIgNsronom REE E EVAPORATION 0 A04K 7RA71ON PERCOLATION LE'rS KEEP THE CREEK RETA.IN FCL E COLD ANDCOPIOUS ... DUDE jb + i• w z "Life 'is not about waitin -for the ut lei r t nonyrriou _ yin 4v Thank You! Brianna Schafer brianna@dailyacts.org FtOHNERT PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES I WWWAPCITY.0110 imp 06 RC)HL NEWT PAIL 9:70MMUNtIFY CENTER 1 5401 SNYDER IANE CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD Date: 'l `% Agenda Item #:_ w Name:A(Ul— Pvm(� Address: Phone: Topic: i �.(:�►�iL� Brief Summary of Comments: k u �tjubo� M uV—. See Reverse ADAMS SURFACING P.O. BOX 1825 SANTA ROSA, CA 95402 707 528-9651 FAX 707 544-5349 NOVEMBER 16, 2016 Supplemental Items for City Council Meeting: N ove rn►�e � �-�- � l � JOB: CONVERTING TWO TENNIS COURTS (#3 & # 4 WEST COURTS) INTO EIGHT PICKLE BALL COURTS AND INSTALLING PERMANENT NEW NET POSTS FOR PICKLE BALL COURTS AT SUNRISE PARK, SNYDER LANE, ROHNERT PARK, CA PROPOSAL 1. JACKHAMMER TO DIG OUT SIXTEEN TWO FOOT DEEP HOLES TO ACCOMMODATE NET POST SLEEVES. 2. SUPPLY AND INSTALL SIXTEEN SLEEVES INTO CONCRETE MIX. 3. SUPPLY AND INSTALL EIGHT SETS OF NEW THREE INCH ROUND NET POSTS (GREEN) AND EIGHT NEW NETS FOR PICKLE BALL. 4. RUN SANDING MACHINE OVER ENTIRE SURFACE OF COURTS. 5. FILL ALL CRACKS WITH NOVA BOND COURT PATCH AND NOVACAULK ELASTDAURIC CRACK FILLER. 6. APPLY TWO COATS OF NOVA ACRYLIC RESURFACER TO ENTIRE SURFACE OF COURTS. 7. APPLY THREE COATS OF NOVA COLOR COAT SYSTEM TO COURTS. COATS WILL BE TEXTURED WITH SAND. COLORS WILL BE NOVAGREEN INSIDE PLAYING AREAS OF EIGHTPICKLE BALL COURTS AND NOVARED OUTSIDE PLAYING AREAS. 8. MEASURE OUT AND APPLY GAME LINES WITH NOVATEX WHITE LINE PAINT FOR EIGHT PICKLE BALL COURTS. PRICE: $25,600.00 (TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS) PRICE GOOD FOR TWO MONTHS FROM PROPOSAL DATE. * THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT INCL UDE THE REMOVAL AND RE -PA VING OF APPX 1100 SO_ UARE FEET OF SINKING AND DETERIORATED ASPHALT ALONG NORTHERN EDGE OF BOTH CO UR TS SUBMITTED BY: STEVE ADAMS, CA LICENSE#689697 The Secret Weapon The brothers say their biggest strength is their family bond. "There are a lot of players that have the same skill level as me and my brother, but, unlike them, we are always communicating, and that might be from playing together all our lives, or being twins, or maybe just being regular siblings," says Joe. John adds, "We've played together so long that we just know each other's moves and what we're going to do. We know exactly where to go." In a Pickle: Play the Game More People Are Sweet 4n If you take a game of tennis and slow it down—smaller court, slower racket, harder -to -hit ball— you get pickieball. The sport is played with wooden paddles and a plastic ball (a ball with larger holes is often used for indoor play; smaller holes for outdoors) on a short, square court. The net is hung at 34 inches in the middle (compared with 36 inches for tennis), and there is a non -volley zone on both sides of the net to prevent high-speed spikes, according to the U.S.A. Pickleball Association rulebook. Players score when the other side can't return a shot. The first side to reach 11 points with a two-point lead wins. John Torres at the net He says the sport is a great one for older players. Ashley Landis for The Wall Street journal The game is believed to be the creation of the late Joel Pritchard, a Washington state congressman, who made up the game on the spot in the summer of 1965 in response to his children's complaints of boredom. The name comes not from the family dog, Pickles, as popularly related. According to a newspaper column by Pritchard's wife, Joan, it was so heavily based on other games it reminded her of the pickle boat in crew, "where oarsmen were chosen from the leftovers of other boats." Pickleball is the first sport to be added for competition in the National Senior Games in 20 years, says spokesman Del Moon. More than half of the states participating in the games recommended adding the sport, based on requests from pickleball players. The popularity of pickleball has grown in the past five years, averaging a thousand new players per year, says Tom Burkhart, pickleball competition director for the NSGA and Mid -South Regional Director for the USAPA. There are now more than 100,000 players in the U.S., according to the USAPA. The number of pickleball courts in North America have doubled to more than 5,600 since 2010. "This is a game that has a lot of participation from people who have never been an athlete in their life," says Mr. Burkhart. "They can still acclimate and become a decent player." The popularity among seniors is creating a trickle-down effect, and pickleball is becoming more popular with schools' physical education programs and at recreational camps, says Becky Wesley, a spokeswoman for NSGA. Casa Grande Dispatch Maricopa Monitor Coolidge Examiner Eloy Enterprise Florence Reminder & Blade -Tribune Arizona City IndependentlEditlon San Tan Valley Sentinel Tri -Valley Dispatch httpllwww.pinalcentral.com/vasa—grande_dispatchlarea_news/cg-resort-hosts-hundreds-for-national-picklebWl-tourneylarticle 452c2el6-a36e-lle6-62dl-eb9llaOe652l.htmi CG resort hosts hundreds for national pickleball tourney By JOEY CHENOWETH Staff Writer Nov 5, 2016 Joey Chenoweth/PinalCentrel Ryan Goodwin returns a plakleball during a practice session Friday ahead of the USA Pioldeball Association natroral tournament which began Saturday at tsh Palm Creek Golf & RV Resort. Goodwin's teamate Marcus Luke Is at left. CASA GRANDE — Most senior communities attract residents seeking peace and quiet, to get away from the big crowds in order to relax and enjoy their retirement. They sure wouldn't like to bring in over 1,000 people from around the country to take part in an intense, immense competition. The residents at Palm Creek Golf & RV Resort in Casa Grande are different. In fact, they might be the opposite. They have united for months of preparation and thousands of volunteer hours to welcome in the biggest event in the U.S. for a tittle -known but fast-growing sport: pickleball. "It's actually a draw," said Donna Christiansen, a park resident and president of the Palm Creek Pickleball Club. "This is crazy. We moved here in 2001, and there wasn't pickleball at the time. Now we have 900 members. It's very addictive, and once you get wrapped up in it you want to be near it. You want to live somewhere you can play it a lot." The game with the funny name incorporates aspects of several different sports — most notably tennis, badminton and table tennis — in order to create an activity that is accessible to people of all ages. The court size is the same as a standard badminton double court, with the two sides zoned much like a tennis court. The nets were originally at badminton height but were eventually lowered to 36 inches, much closer to tennis. The rackets are like larger versions of these used in table tennis but smaller than a tennis racket. The ball is similar to what is used in wiffle ball but smaller. The USA Pickleball Association each year organizes its biggest competition, called Nationals. This year's event runs from today through Nov. 13. This is the eighth year for this competition, and the second that has been played at Palm Creek. It's a logical location for the tournament because the park contains 32 dedicated pickleball courts. "It's very prestigious to have it," Christiansen said. "I don't know how long we'll have it, but right now the amount of players out there are outpacing the number of courts. There are very few out there that have as many dedicated courts as we do." USAPA President David Jordan said more than 900 players have registered to play in this event, coming In from all over the country as well as Canada, Mexico and even one from Spain. These are the best players in the world. They are split up into singles, doubles, men's, women's, mixed, senior and youth. Most players compete in at least three of those categories over the course of the tournament, vying for a total purse of $20,000. When Nationals started eight years ago, there were only 400 players registered. It remained at that level over the next couple of years but has grown by about 100 players every year since then. "We've been working for a lot of the year," Jordan said. "When we started out about 14 years ago, we had about 400 members. Now we're up to about 16,000." Pickleball is a relatively young sport, tracing its origins back to 1965 when three men from a small island in Washington created a gam that they hoped would appease their bored children. They found a badminton court, some table tennis paddles and a plastic ball and discovered that all the elements worked well together. They wrote up some rules, formed a corporation to promote and protect the sport and watched as it grew from there. According to the USA Pickleball Association, there is no official record of how the sport got its name, but there are two humorous anecdotes. The first involves Joan Pritchard, the wife of one of the founders — then -state Rep. Joel Pritchard — who noted that the mish-mashed sport reminded her of a pickleboat, "where the oarsmen were chosen from the leftovers of other boats." Barney McCallum, another founder, said the name originated from the Pritchards' dog Pickles. He is quoted as saying, "The Pritchards had a dog named Pickles, and you're having fun at a party, right? So anyways, what the hell, let's just call it pickleball." it has since taken off in senior communities across the country. "It's a good senior sport," Christiansen said. "It's great for all ages, but I think it really took off as a senior sport, because there are a lot of people who played tennis but now can't run all over the court. Its a little smaller, a little faster. Tennis gave you time to get to the ball. Here, they play mostly right by the net." David Wight, the pickleball club's vice president, was living in the Palm Springs, California area five years ago when he first started playing pickleball. Even though he had no previous racket sport experience, he was instantly in love with the sport. He came to Palm Creek for a tournament a couple years ago and saw a place with a large, highly competitive base of players, where he could live a fun, thrilling life, "I moved here because of the pickleball," Wight said. "It's the best place in the world." Jordan said Wight's experience is common. "Once you put a paddle in their hands and they hit the ball a couple times, they usually get hooked," Jordan said. "It's a great sport for men, women, old, young. It's a lot easier on your body, and it's definitely a game where you can strategically play." Part of USAPAs mission is to grow the sport, which has become easier over the years thanks to word of mouth. Jordan said a problem his organization is facing is that the number of players is outpacing the amount of facilities in which to play. USAPA is working with municipalities to get more courts put in around the country. They also provide grants to middle and high schools to start pickleball programs, "There are a lot of tennis courts sitting out there doing nothing, nobody is playing on them and grass is growing on them in some cases," Jordan said. "They can easily be converted into pickleball courts, and they can get a lot of use out of them. You can get four pickleball courts out of one tennis court. That's 16 People playing instead of four." The hope is that in the not -too -distant future there will be more pickleball paradises like Palm Creek, where people can learn to play. For now, people In Casa Grande can enjoy the one they have right down the road. The competition is open to the public, running from B a.m. to the early evening every day. It is free to attend, and those who do can see the hard work put in by a small part of the city's community to put together a large-scale event. "It takes a village," Christiansen said. "It takes a huge village." lGet Carded Casa GrandeValleyNewspapers Inc. Commercial Printing Stn{ fn C+ud 8uru1nnhvi 200 W. 2ndSt.•CasaGrande i------ URYdeSIPMaad printed " (520)836-3111 • PlnalCentral.tam USAPA UPDATES Sport of plddebalLexpands In Las Vegas area (http://www.usapa.org/usapa.news/sport-of- 'Ift • OUTDOOR RFSC M JusmRntion N ! I.,,......Y: N17)Q .� +r'ICKLBh7 L (/usapa-membership/) (httpY/www.usapa.orp� Home / Store Tournaments a Ratings Training a Court Info Membership/ Donations Rules a Referees Ambassadors Places to Play Pickleball A d o erPlace Name Places to Play About USAF Select State, Province or Country Code: AK AL AR X17 A 91 QC U f -L _(5A lil IA L12 IL ILS KS KY LA MA MD aL lVIT MO NLS lITINCN-11NENH W NIVINV I121AQKDRPA-RT5C22MTX S�ZA_VI WAW? w6/ M Canada: ,LO,B _C MB ly_B NI INS ON PE OC SK International: ABW AUS BEL BLZ BgE3 Cgs GBR GRC GTM MEX NIC 1LZ, All P_iaePs lnteve M pof l c s to P a _ E ist of 3-letter_94urttry Cold9s ece t!y_Added laces to Play F eisa Guide Please help us to have a complete and accurate list of Places to Play by posting any new locations to this database or by contacting a nr.; ll5APA arnbassadc:r to post a new location or any new information. Anyone is allowed to post a new location, just click on Add Another PI Name at the top of any places -to -play page. Badminton Plaices to Play If you are unable to find a place to play pickleball, check out some of the links for places to play badminton. A pickleball court is the same size as a doubles badminton court. Just lower the net to 3 feet (34 inches at the center) and yc are ready to go, Start your own group and watch it grow. U akato badminton places to jjLgy Month-end Chart of the Growth of Places to Play Pickleball Places to Play MOnah End Share I__ J Share 463 USAPA Affiliate Partners rrRO LI -f r , PICKLEBALL-X PKk1-ne" ur Reeb .5�LL '""'6`' f'Al_ai?� Poen®erria.W Y.51 LLi 1i Y_I �js PlliRl Casa Grande Dispatch Maricopa Monitor Coolidge Examiner Eloy Enterprise Florence Reminder & Blade -Tribune Arizona City Independent/Edition San Tan Valley Sentinel Tri -Valley Dispatch A " ... V.Eight locations throughout Final County to serve you. s Now enrolling for Spring semester! hftpl/www.pinalcentral.com/casa-grande dispatch4ocal sportslpicWeball-not-just-for-grandparents-anymore/artioleJfi809582-a75B-1le6-9875-436efc108aad.html FEATURED Pickleball not just for grandparents anymore By RODNEY HAAS Staff Writer Updated Nov 11, 2016 Oscar Perez Pickleball 2016 Nationals VIII Tuesday at Palm creek.The 10 day tournament ends Nov 14. "For me it's so much fun and the people you meet are welcoming and are fun to play with," Elliott said. "Pretty much everyone you " # - meet you most likely become friends with them." It's atrend that has officials like David Jordan, president of the governing body of the sport, USA Pickleball Association, excited about the future of the sport. CASA GRANDE — Rachel Elliott is making her third appearance at .. the national pickleball championships this week. a But the Oxford, Florida native is not your typical pickleball player, a sport that typically associated with retires in RV parks and retirement communities. I[S +21 err Instead the 14 -year-old Elliot represents a new trend of players, `-- Pickleball 2016 Nationals VIII younger, traveling professionals who find games and courts while Updated Nov 10, 2016 moving from town to town on business trips. "For me it's so much fun and the people you meet are welcoming and are fun to play with," Elliott said. "Pretty much everyone you " # - meet you most likely become friends with them." It's atrend that has officials like David Jordan, president of the governing body of the sport, USA Pickleball Association, excited about the future of the sport. Hundreds arrive to play some Jordan recalls when he first joined the association in its second year, pickleball there was 300 members. Now, 11 years later, the association has 16,000 members and averages about 1,000 new members a month. s7 y 1.- .' "It's a fun sport," said Jordan of the rise in popularity among the younger generation. "It started off with mostly seniors and then they passed it down to their kids and their grand kids. If you look at it, we have 88 -year-olds playing. The health benefits of it. You get a lot of tennis players who can't play — this court is not too big. It's much ki,17 smaller. Pickle ball is opposite from tennis where in tennis, singles is CG resort hosts hundreds for the most popular sport and not doubles. In pickleball it's just the national pickleball tourney opposite." Having the sport passed down is how Elliott and her brother got Pickleball: 'Ping pong on a involved when she was 10 years old. She said that her grandparents badminton court' picked up the sport when they moved to The Villages, a retirement community in Florida located just about 45 miles northwest of Orlando. It was there that she said her grandparents first taught her Pickleball courts planned for parents including her dad who used to play NCAA Division I tennis. Arizona City Golf Club "It's definitely a lot of fun and it's definitely a family sport," said Elliott, who added that she was able to play in mixed doubles with her parents. "We didn't medal, but we scared some of the top teams. So it's a lot of fun and we had a lot of fun playing with our family. "It's a sport for all ages, but it's mostly for 50 and over. All the younger players are coming into the sport." Elliot and her family are just some of the 800 players competing this week in the national tournament being held at Palm Creek RV resort. This weekend the tournament will welcome the nation's best of 4.5 and 5.0 rated players who will be competing for a combined $21,000 prize money, spread out among two divisions, a 19-49 year old open division and a 50 and over open division. "(The 19-49 group) has lots of experience and it's a very different game then if you were going to watch the 85 plus crew," said Rosemary Reese, of Casa Grande, who is the assistant regional director of the Southwest Region which includes Arizona, New Mexico and Mexico. WOM f7, ." "'AUS p53fl15A6-11,1-wwrw-PinalCcn�,el.cen, Jordan added that a part of the reason for the explosion of growth in the sport among 19-49 year olds has to do with the change in society. For most current retires, their working years were spent having to physically showing up to the office and work. However, today's young professionals are mobile where a laptop and a wifi connection is the new office, and as a result frees them up to play and travel to pickleball tournaments. Then they can head to a coffee shop and go back to work. "A lot of these young folks don't go to the office anymore. They work on their computers at home. That's why many are able to play and get into the sport," Jordan said. How much the sport is changing is evident in how Jordan noted eight years ago their wwas only four sponsorship signs ringing around the courts. Today there are numerous sponsorships along with vender tents selling merchandise and accessories. "it's huge. I think all of these factors have contributed to where we are at now," Reese said. "Between Dave and 1, we have put in a lot of years and people ask me if it gets boring. 'No.' Because it's always changing." to a Aa,zo^,� REAS STA E Successful Home Search BUYERS' GUIDE TRENDS (HTTP:NINWW.CONNECTSPORTS.COMIPRIMARY_TAG/TRENDS/} What's Behind Pickleball's Massive Grp By Matt Swenson, November 8, 2016 (http://www.connectsports.com/feature/Whats-behind-picklebal Is -massive -growths (http://www.connectsports.com/feature/whats-behind-pickleballs-massive-growths (http://www.connectsports. com/feature/Whats-behind-picklebal Is -massive -growths (http://www.connectsports.com/featurelwhats-behind-pickleballs-massive-growth/) (http://www. connectsports.comlfeaturelwhats-behi nd-pickleballs-massive-g rowthl (http://www. connectsports.comtfeature/whats-behi nd-pickleballs-massive-growth/) (http://www. connectsports.com/feature/whats-behind-pickleballs-massive-growth/) (http://www.connectsports. com/feature/W hats-behind-pickl ebal Is -massive -growths Pickleball's surge in popularity is evident when looking at USA Pickleball (http:/)www.usapa.orgn Association Nati, In 2013, 400 players participated in a 24 -court event. This year, about 900 are playing on 32 courts, and an extra competition Nov. 5-13 at Palm Creek Golf & RV Resort (http://palmcreekgolf.com/). "We're maxed out," says Justi director of nearly four years. "We've had waiting lists since June." That's with minimal advertising too. Maloof expl what's led to the pickleball revolution and why it looks to keep going. Organization. Pickleball was born in Bainbridge Island, Washington, in 1965. But USAPA didn't come to be until wasn't a sport; pickleball was just a game," says Maloof. USAPA created a comprehensive rule book, sanctioned sport. PAGES (http:/Mww.connectsports.com/feature/Whats-behind-pickleballs-massive-growth/2� F(http://www.connectsports.comtfeature/whats-behind-pi ckleballs-massive-growth/3n LAS VEGAS REVIEW -JOURNAL Emall alerts e -Edition Apps Subscriptions Rf:C*CM SI0'les Outboard Motor Rebuilding Get Your Motor Running4Less 2 Year Warranty-Reman/Rebuild Go to <' texasoutboardrebuild. corn ` 49°F sunny ilas Vegas IJV ;;cine { Local I L-•,,.':< I Busipess I Ocinior; I Crit-ne EnteNainment I Life I Video Otks I Autos ;some€ Jobs I Cleosifliads `kc,,'ewz di:- Home v Sporis Phoenix prep guard Jay... Devonte Bovd, UNLV didn't... Share Posted November 15, 2016 - 1:39pm Updated November 15, 2016- 11:06pm Sport of pickleball expands in Las Vegas area CALENDAR Saturday: Color Me Kind SK, Henderson Saturday: Fast and the Furriest, SK, 1 M run, Las Vegas By BETSY HELFAND LAS VEGAS REVIEW -JOURNAL After competing in a pickleball league in Minnesota this summer, Rick Johnson returned to Ljs Vegas and started a website with a new league about two months ago. How Men Tighten Their Skin Remove "Old Man" Wrinkles And I Eve -Bags Quickly And Easily GOLF GUIDE 2016; Las Vegas Golf Guide L :il NFL BARS IN LAS VEGAS > Q0 N "_ - , >• =%I= nevadapreL s.com t•Aost Popular Las Vegas casino executives named to Trump inaugural committee Saturday: Lightin' It Up For Linemen. 5K Saturday: Mount Charleston Marathon, marathon. half marathon, Las Vegas Saturday: Pray for Snow Party at Skye Canyon, Las Vegas Sunday: PJ 5K, Las Vegas There were six teams in his league in Minnesota, and he was hoping to maybe match that- ADVF RNS i\G Johnson did way better than that. The newly formed Las Vegas Pickleball League, which begins play in January, has 16 teams and more than 300 participants, making it the largest pickleball league in the country. It gives pickleball enthusiasts around the area a new way to compete as the sport continues to grow. "The pickleball league opens up a whole new social outlet for pickleball to mix people together," said Johnson, who estimated that about 200 of the league's members had played pickleball in the past, with about 100 new members. Pickleball is a paddle sport with similarities to tennis, badminton and pingpong. While it has been popular with seniors around the Las Vegas Valley, the league is helping expand its reach to a younger crowd, too. "It's kind of a cool sport that the grandson can play with grandpa and be competitive, and they can both have a good time," Johnson said. "It's a really unusual sport that way that everyone in the family can play and have a good time." The league is almost an equal mix of men and women, and Johnson said the youngest players are probably about 14 and the oldest in their SOS or 90s. 9 of 21 Clark County schools tabbed for possib:e charter takeove, Las Vegas homebuilder buvs Penn Jillelle,< mansion The Slarn na: Husband wants to stop Clark County lav;suil over death of wife, attorney Susan winters Norwegian Air suspending four Las Vegas routes because it's just too hot Columnists Features In The Outdoors Nevada offers plant; of open space for hunteis to share Jane Ann Morrison s Al Capcno gun rrh; u;, embarrasses the IRS KATS! Ricky Martin gave Las Vegas guitarist lesson in real rock stardom Ron Kantowski Former Las Vegas Stars manager _ Russ Nixon remembered 14 Nlore Columnists League adviser John Sloan said he was delightfully surprised by the amount of interest in the league. More videos: "When people get into pickleball, they really get hooked and they love it, and they just seek opportunities to play the sport," Sloan said. "It's a very socially positive environment to be ow around other pickleball players because they have a lot of fun, it's competitive and ;;.► exhilarating." CALENDAR Sloan was a pickleball ambassador for seven years before recently relinquishing the role. When he started it, he said there was one community in the area that was starting to play 17 18 r s 20 21 22 - !' All week the sport. In-A-Fecl Now, he said they have pickleball at all of the active adult communities around the valley. The Orleans Thumday, Nov 17, 9:00 pm "Retired people, for the most part, have been the ones promoting the sport the most vigorously," Sloan said. , ? . Karaoke Harrah's Las Vegas But he's out to change that, working with the Clark County School District to get pickleball Monday, Nov 21.6:00 pm into all 60 of the middle schools. Cool Change Onix, which makes pickleball paddles and balls, has donated 1,500 paddles to help the Rampart casino cause, and Sloan has been leading clinics with physical education coaches around the V%dnessay, Nov 23,6:00 pm area. Karaoke He said about 15 schools were involved and the project has started to pick up momentum. saddle%rSpurs salocn 888 884-0153 L QViESr' FRICE Ul:;1F;r.h ; FE St _bG AP_ VJ? U5 I•;i USA ORDERS OVER S69 AND GET OUR LO W PRICE GUARANTEE Limired rIMC Offer" Lave it orsend ircack fora full refund! Sat gar-, ]jDM r'aciJ'i_ 7M.'? Type what you're looking for her, NETS SETS CLOTHING ACCESSORIES DEALS You are here: Home > Learning Center > Pickleball Court Construction The Definitive Guide to Pickleball Court Construction As the Baby Boomers started trickling into retirement a few years ago, something explosive began in the world of Pickleball. Now with that trickle in full flood, Pickleball is one of the fastest growing sports in the America. According the USA Pickleball Association,(www.usapa.org), last year alone, 52:3 new pickleball courts were opened up nation wide. So far this year? If you or your community hasn't gotten on the pickle bail bandwagon yet, it's high time to make it happen. Whether you're interested in setting up a simple court at home, re -purposing an underused basketball or tennis court, or helping to bring your community a multi -court complex, this guide is intended to help you through each step of the process. We'll start with the most basic of court zonstruction so chat iF you're new to the game you can get yourself hooked as quickly and inexpensively as possible. Already hooked and ready to upgrade your playing surface? We'll walk you through the process of transforming some ready-made and underutilized spaces that almost every town has. Does your community already have a strong and growing p'ickieball club? Sounds like you're ready to start working with your local Parks 6 Recreation Department to Find a dedicated space for multiple courts, perhaps even with some lighting for those short winter days. Cost Considerations Costs of pickleball-court construction vary widely, depending on how elaborate your vision is. On the low end, to get started with a simple home set, i.e. a portable net, 4 -paddles, balls, and a roll of court tape, you'll be looking at roughly $200- $400. On the high end, you could work off of the example set bythe pickleball club of Bend, OR, which recently raised close to $300,000 for a new B -court complex complete with lighting for evening play and stadium seating for tournaments. However, it's in between the $300 starter set and the $300,000 multi -court community complex, is where most folks will fall. Here's a rough cost breakdown: Net/Court Tape - $300 Court Resurfacing - $3,500 - $5,000 New Court Construction Basic ($10,000 - S15,000) • Basic plus lighting and fencing - $20,000 - $35,000 • 8 -Court Community Complex with fencing but no lighting - $110,000 - $150,0o0) • 8 -Court Community Complex with fencing, lighting, and stadium seating - $300,000 and up. Whatever your budget though, pickleball is an easy sport to get into, and an even easier sport to love. Other Considerations Noise - are your neighbors, home owners association, or community at large ok with a court or courts going in? A growing number of communities have started to deal with complaints about pickleball noise. See: and (A noise reducing option is highlighted below) Orientation - Where does the predominant light come from on your site? Shade? Wind? What time of day will you typically be playing? All of these factors should be considered when you're determining the orientation of your court(s). The USAPA recommends a north -south orientation. Court Color - Regardless of the surface you choose For your court, you will have your options of color schemes. To play around with different color options click here: 1---t_ '' •:.:: •' •,i_:.:5vs4 ?i- „v> . :r:- _: ' ' n,:' DIY vs Professional Contractors - putting in a basic court with an existing pad is a relatively easy endeavor that almost anyone could do. With the right tools, you could even put in your own permanent nets, and paint a nice court. But if you're looking at resurfacing or building a new court, it's 1;.,orth the extra cost to have a professional do it right. They'll not only warranty their work in most cases, but they'll also help ensure that your new court is up to code for your community. Back to Basics Pickleball began as a backyard creation in 1965 when a group of friends couldn't find the shuttlecock to play badminton with. Over a few days of tinkering, the creators worked outthe equipment kinks and rules. They dropped the badminton net to 36", built some basic paddles out of plywood,. and used a wiffleball. If you have a paved, Flat driveway or an old asphalt basketball court, then you're ready to slap some lines down and get playing. • An official Pickle -ball court is 20 -feet wide by 44 -feet long. However, you'll want to leave room on the sides and ends for running off court after playing a ball, so the recommended playing area is 34 -feet by 64 -feet. If converting tennis courts, four picklebal I courts can fit in the same area at dimensions of 30 -feet by 60 -feet (see diagram below). If you're setting up your court indoors, it's recommended that you have at least 16-20 feet of height to the light fixtures. Official Pickleball Court Size NON-VOLLEY. Not 36' ZONE Official Size - 20'x44' Recommended Total Playing Area - 34'x64' Height (Indoor Courts) - 18'-20' Supplies You'Il Need: • A spool of string, or a carpenter's chalkline, to mark off initial lines before permanently marking them. • Tape Measure • Court Tape ($8.99 for a 200 -foot roll x 2 -rolls) or line marking paint ($15.99 per can) or Pickleball Court Stencils A more portable option are E2 Court Lines ($29.99) if taped or painted lines aren't an option. • If painting lines, a sealer should be considered as well to prevent the lines from bleeding. • Nets: Portable Nets System ($159-$259) Permanent Net Posts ($289-$379) • Permanent Net ($79-$159) 'If converting a local basketball or tennis court, or even putting lines in a neighborhood cul-de-sac, you'll want to make sure to get permission from your local Parks & Recreation Department and/or the neighborhood home owners association first. • Step 1: After selecting the area that you want to put the court in, tape the end of your string to the ground. • Step 2: measure out 20 -Feet in as straight of a line as possible. Pull the string taught and tape the end to the ground. • Step 3: At a right-angle to your second corner, measure out 44 -Feet and tape that end to the ground, (a large carpenter's square can come in handy here), • Step 4: Repeat Step 2 at a right-angle to your last corner and then repeat step 3 at a right angle to that corner. (In measuring your final 44 -foot section you may realize that you're off by a few inches, in which case you'll need to adjust the positioning of the previous corners to fix your angles), • Step 5: Once you have four square corners and the distances accurate, use your court tape or line spray and go over the top of your new rectangular line. Now that you have the basic outline in place setting up the rest of the lines will be easy. • Step 6: Measure 22 -feet from the end -line and set a net post up. From the opposite end corner do the same and set up your net • Step 7: From each corner measure 15 -feet towards the net and make a mark. Tie aline between the marks and paint or tape over it; these are your volley lines. Step 8: Measure in 10 -feet on your new volley lines and make a mark. Do the same on each end -line. Tie a line between the marks and paint or tape over it. Step 9: Start playing some pickleball! If doing it yourself isn't quite your style, or if you have a pad that needs to be improved before playing on it, call your local sports court surfacer and they can paint professional lines or resurface your existing pad to your specifications. Resurfacing costs will be specific to your court site, but generally will range between $3,500-$5,000. Another option for your court surface is a tile court system such as VersaCourt. Some players don't like the way the ball bounces on a tile court system, but we've gotten fairly good reviews about them recently. The primary benefit of a VersaCourt system is that its design drastically reduces the impact on joints and the lower back. It's grippy surface reduces the risks when lunging orjumping for balls. The added safety and reduced wear and tear on your body from a VersaCourt system will cost approximately $5,000-$8,000. Four Piakleball Courts Per Tennis Court Diagram r� ate— 1- I Diagram showing the layout for four pickleball courts on a tennis court. Tennis court shown with red lines. Building Your Own Court From The Ground Up But what if you don't have a big, flat driveway? Or the local tennis club doesn't want to share their courts with you and your group of pickleballers? Perhaps it's time to call your local concrete contractor and sports court surfacer. We talked to Jason Black at Cascade Sports and Tennis Court Surfacing, about the costs and steps of putting in a new court or resurfacing an old one. Jason and his team surfaced the court at our Kent, Washington headquarters and they did a fantastic job. Jason recommends calling up a concrete contractor or landscape architect first and getting a quote from them. Pouring a new courtvaries dramatically in cost depending on the site you've selected for your court. Variables such as drainage, excavation, grading, and site layout will affect the cost per square foot. You'll also want to look into your community's regulations regarding drainage, some areas require a certain amount of drainage per lot, which your house and any other structures will count against. Do you even have enough drainable space to put a new concrete pad? Do you have room for parking? For a minimum of a 1,500 square foot pad, the price could vary from $8,000 - $35,000. Asphalt is cheaper to pour, but the surfacing costs are higher because there's more air pockets to fill. Contractors most likely will not give you a quote over the phone, they'll need to come look at the site to give you an estimate. Once you've got your estimate and a trusted contractor, that's when you call your local court surfacing company and talk to someone like Jason. Your court surfacing company will contact with the concrete contractor before they pour the slab and make sure they pourthe pad properly. It is imperative that the slab is poured specifically for court construction. "It kills me when people pour their expensive pad and the concrete guy says a vapor barriers or zip strips aren't necessary;' Jason said. "It has to be poured specifically as a court, not as you would pour a patio or sidewalk, otherwise folks end up having to patch their brand new pads to make them work as courts" Jason emphasized three important points in dealing with your concrete contractor. Insist on a medium broom finish; A vapor barrier to help with proper drainage is a must to insure the longevity of your court; • And make sure the contractor uses zip strips in forming the seams between sections of the pad. (If you look at most patios or sidewalks you'll notice a roughly 112 inch gap between sections, which would have to be filled and patched before a court surface was put down. Patches wear down much faster than the rest of your pad. On a new pad, nobody wants a patch!) A couple of other points you'll wantto address with the contractor is whether or not you want permanent net posts installed, if you want fencing around the court, and if you want lighting. If so, all three will need to take place with the pour. Once you've got your pad poured to the exact specifications you need, it will take 28 -days for the concrete pad to cure before a court surface can be applied; 14 -days in the case of asphalt. Once it's cured, it will take only about 3 or 4 days, sunshine dependent, for a company like Cascade Sports and Tennis Court Surfacing to finish off your new court. For a brand new court at 1,500 square feet, the cost for surfacing will be about $3,500 - $5,000, (a bit cheaper for resurfacing as less coats of acrylic are necessary). "We start by filling in any seems or imperfecltions the concrete contractor may have left, Jason said. "We apply an adhesion promoter, which has to be done quickly, but is painstaking work. We get that down and then have to get the first coat of Acrylic down within two hours. For every 30 -gallons of the acrylic paint, we mix in 300lbs of sand. This fills in all the cracks and air pockets and gives your court that nice textured surface' The first coat dries in about an hour and they scrape all the sand that hasn't gone into any cracks back off, (almost all of it). The acrylic has to cure for about an hour before a second coat can be applied. Next comes the surface paint, which is at least a two day process with new courts as two coats are necessary. This is also a bit weather dependent for outdoor courts as the product requires direct sunlight to dry properly_ "We always try to put the second coat on in the morning, so I can watch it dry and make sure the sun hits the whole court," Jason said. "If you've got one corner where the sun isn't hitting, it won't dry consistently and cure properly." Once the second coat has cured properly, court lines are painted and not long after you're ready to break in your new pickleball court! Invite your friends over and before you know it pickleball will be growing rapidly throughout your community. Building a Community Court Complex Now that you've been helping grow the sport of pickle ball in your community by modifying existing courts, working with the Parks & Recreation Department, and even building your own backyard court, perhaps it's time for a dedicated multi -court complex. There's a lot of work and organization thatgoes into getting to this stage, but if your group of pickleballers has the momentum going, perhaps it's time to start the process. To provide us with an example of how to get this stage of growth going, we talked to A.J. Fraties, President of the Bend Pickleball Club. From humble beginnings, the Bend pickleball Club has successfully raised over $110,000 and secured matching funds from the Bend Parks S Recreations Department to build an 8 -court complex dedicated solely to pickleball. After those courts were finished in the summer of 2024, they quickly received a private donation of $250,000 to build another 8 -court complex complete with lighting for evening play and stadium seating in order to host tournaments. Amenities to Consider • Benches - a bench on either side of the court should be considered for resting and/or viewing ($100-$300) • Gear Storage - hooks to hang jackets, cubbies for bags, etc. • Tables outside of playing area for socializing ($200-$800) • Restrooms - Hosting a weekend tournament? A portable toilet can be rented for $100-$300. Want a Porta Potty on site permanently, it'll cost about $800. • Parking - If the courts are open to public, parking will become an issue if Pickleball grows in your community as fast as it does everywhere else. • Maintenance Storage - Equipment such as brooms, leaf blowers, washing equipment, will be necessary to keep the court properly maintained. "in-kind donations from local contractors was an important part of our overall fundraising efforts; A.J. said, In exchange for name plaques at the entrances to courts and banner advertising at tournaments, the Bend Pickleball Club received in-kind donations from a handful of local contractors. Whether it was to help with the concrete pad, painting the courts, installing the fences, or putting in benches, the Bend Pickleball Club left no stone unturned in approaching local business sponsors. Lighting • A minimum of two 1.500 watt lamps • Poles should be 18-20' high • Poles mounted in center. at least 24" back from court • Costs will vary but expect S1,500-$2.000 per light pole installed with fixtures The overall construction process is the same for a multi -court system as itis for a single court, just on a larger scale. One aspect to consider though are ball barrier fences between the courts. This is just a 4 -foot fence, with padding, to prevent balls going into the courts of other players. Fencing • Should be 10 -feet high • A lower 4 -foot fence can be used. but youll want to make sure to pad the top of the fence in order to prevent injuries • Contact your local contractor for a cost estimate Acoustifence should be considered to reduce noise. A recent study by the USAPA showed that installing Acoustifence around pickleball courts reduced noise by over 50 percent. A 6'x30' roll of Acoustifence material will cost around $750. "We had the benefit of a working with a Parks & Recreation Department that gave us a dedicated site with infrastructure already in place;" A.J. added, while discussing the paved parking area and restrooms. "We didn't have to raise money for that, which helped a lot' With a strong and growing pickleball club, the support of your local Parks & Recreation Department, and some support from local businesses, you can have your multi -court complex ready for tournaments in no time. Your email address rnEutioe Terms and Conditions I Secure Shopping I Privacy Policy aJO_e al : , This conversion would involve providing new surfacing and striping for 6 Pickleball courts along with the installation of 6 nets and posts. It would mean we would retain the tennis nets as a divider and line the 6 courts (3 on each side of the tennis nets), allowing us to get 2 additional Pickleball courts in the space. Both companies indicated that the cost and installation of each net would be about $1100 for a total of $6600 , which is included in the estimate. The remaining cost would be for the resurfacing, painting and striping. We are very sincere about doing a joint project and sharing in the cost to obtain dedicated Pickleball courts. We look forward to having the opportunity to work together on this project. Revenue Estimates If there were dedicated Pickleball Courts, there is a possibility of adding revenue through the formation of leagues and tournaments which would be run by City staff. We could explore hosting "The Martini Cup, the Inaugural Martinez Pickleball Tournament," which could draw competitors from across northern California. Recommendation T,r`✓G 1p� L�cti`1I lea We would like to request the PaU�&G recommend that the City Council support the Court Conversion Project and direct staff to work with the �Wickleball Group on its implementation. My Spee Tennis Story: Hi, my name is Nate and I'm a tennis teaching pro. I came up with the idea for Spec Tennis after my experience playing paddle tennis in Southern California and platform tennis in Connecticut. Both of those sports are a ton of fun, but are played only in specific areas of the country on an extremely limited number of courts. By comparison, I was struck by the number of pickleball courts that are popping up all over the US, seemingly on a daily basis. So I began experimenting by trying out various tennis balls, paddles and rules on pickleball courts with other tennis pros. The end result was Spec Tennis, which is more competitive and challenging than pickleball (and more tennis -like!). In Spec Tennis,the relationship between the net height, the dimensions of the court, and the bounce of the ball, make it difficult to hit a lot of outright "winners" As a result, there are lots of incredible rallies and players have to focus on constructing the point. This is true in both singles and doubles . I also created the rules and designed a scoring system that is easy to remember, and makes play very efficient. With players getting only one serve, the majority of the time spent on the court is actually playing Spec Tennis. There is not a lot of time spent picking up balls or changing sides. Another key benefit of Spec Tennis is that even if there is not a court in your area, confit can be create. in I minutes using painter's tape (to mark the lines) and a portable net, on any standard tennis court. Thanks for reading and I hope to see you on the Spec court in the future! Best, Nate THE OFFICIAL USSPTA RULES OF SPEC TENNIS COUNT 1) Play is on a 44 x 20 foot asphalt court (commonly known as a pickleball court). 2) The net is 32 inches high at center and 34 inches high at sidelines. 3) The four serving boxes are 10 x 15 feet and begin at the baselines and end 7 feet from the net. 4)The same court is used for singles and doubles. EQUIPMENT 1) Play is with a perforated paddle, which can be textured or untextured. 2) Paddles can be up to 19 inches long, and up to 9 1/2 inches wide, and up to 1 1/2 inches thick. 3) The official ball for tournament play is the Wilson US Open orange dot tennis ball. SCORING 1) Games are played to 4 points. At 3 points -all, the next point wins. 2) Sets are played to 4 games. At 3 games -all, the next game wins. 3) Tournament singles and doubles matches are 3 out of 5 sets. 4) Recommended recreational play for singles and doubles is 2 out of 3 sets. 5) Points are won and lost as in tennis, with the exception of the serve where a single fault results in loss of point. THE SERVE 1) Players get one serve. 2) Server must contact the ball at belt height or below (an underhand serve). Server can strike the ball with or without bouncing it first. 3) In tournament play, server must have both feet behind the baseline and one foot on a designated mark 4 feet behind the intersection of the baseline and sideline while contacting the ball. 4) In recreational play, server must have both feet behind the baseline and one foot in line with the sideline while contacting the ball. 5) Serve must land in the opposite diagonal box. Lines are in play. Serves that hit the net (lets) are in play. SERVING FORMAT 1) To begin a singles or doubles match, players spin the racquet. Winner(s) can either choose to serve first or choose to let the opponent(s) serve first. The non-server(s) chooses which side of the court to begin on. 2) The serving procedure is similar to tennis. In singles, the server begins in the deuce court and serves the entire game, alternating between the deuce and the ad court. The opponent serves the next game. In doubles, players alternate in order: Team A, player 1; Team B, player 1; Team A, player 2; Team B, player 2. 3) The service returner must let the serve bounce before hitting it. 4) Players change sides after each set only. 5) When a new set begins, the existing order of service continues unchanged. OTHER RILES OF PLAY 1) Players can serve -and -volley in both singles and doubles. The server (or serving team) is not obligated to let the service return bounce on his (their) side of the court. 2) The pickleball restraint line, 7 feet from the net, does not apply to Spec Tennis. Players in both singles and doubles can volley the ball (out of the air) from any position on the court. 3) Players are allowed a 30 -second standing water break after each game, and a 3 -minute seated break after each set. 4) Players cannot play rebounds off the back or side fences. If a ball hits a fence or other perimeter barrier, the point is over. 5) If during play an errant ball from another court comes onto the court, the point stops and is replayed as a Let. 6) if during play a player is impeded or potentially impeded by a player on an adjacent court, the point stops and is replayed as a Let. 7) No Lets are awarded based on a player being impeded by a fence or other perimeter barrier. Players are responsible for being cognizant of out-of-bounds distances, which can vary by court. 8) A player touching the net, or the opponent's court, during play, including with his paddle, results in the loss of point. 9) Players may follow through over the net, but may not contact the ball on the opponent's side of the net. The one exception is: If the wind or spin brings the opponent's shot back over the net, the player can strike the ball on the opponent's side of the net if it hasn't bounced twice. 10) The USSPTA code of conduct is in effect during match play. Match officials and/or tournament directors have the authority to warn, penalize and default offending players. USAPA UPDATES CG resort hosts hundreds for national plckleball tourney (httpJ/w6vw.usapa.org/usapa-nev PICKL EBRL L (httpJ/www.usapa.org) 1 Seach.- (/usapa-membership/) Home / Store Tournamellte 8 Ratings Training a Court Info Membership/Donations; Rules & Referees Ambassadors Places to Play Para-Pickleball LIKE US IFP Rulebook Update: April 2015 j►ifillNyq (http://www.challengedathletes.org/site/c.4nJHJQPgEiKUE/b.6449449A.B480/Operation-Rebound.htm) (https://www.selkirk.com/) Adrienne Barlow, USAPA Para-Pickleball Ambassador - email (mailto:adrib0997@gmaii.com) (http://rocknrolipickleball.com/) For more information about para-pickleball, click the Rock N Roll Pickleball logo: 2016 Valor Games Far West Demo & Clinic: Click Here (https://www.youtube.com/watch7v=sl-n2-tin6U) to view a video. rr �Q4 What is Para-Pickleball? Para-Pickleball is pickleball using a classification system versus a skill rating. A classification system is used versus a skill rating to categorize impairment levels specific for those wishing to compete with a variety of physical impairments. Although the sport of pickleball is already accommodating to many, para-pickleball was created to form meaningful -competitive opportunities for a variety of permanent -physical impairments including physical disabilities accommodated with wheelchairs, power chairs and crutches. Ambulatory/standing athletes with a diagnosed physical disability or disabilities may also compete. Para-pickleball uses a classification approach similar to the International Paralympic Committee (https)/www.paralympic.org/classification), thus pairing athletes in competition classes to compete with and against others of similar or like impairment levels. Some restrictions apply. Volunteers Needed to Form Classification Committee: If you are an M.D., Physical Therapist or other physical medicine specialist, we are forming a classification committee for para-pickleball. Ifyou are interested In serving on this committee and have experience in any ofthe above listed specialties, please send your CV and other qualifications to USAPA Para-Pickleball at email (mailto:adrib0997@gmail.com). The USAPA Board collaborated with a committee comprised of selected individuals, both "Standing Players"and "Wheelchair Players" to develop rules specific to wheelchair pickleball. The following rules have been finalized and have been added as "Section 16 - Wheelchair Pickleball" to the IFP Pickleball Rule Book. SECTION 16 - WHEELCHAIR RULES News Events (http; twww,usapa.QgVusapa-news/marlborough-Vick4 16. A. Basic Play league -attracts -more -than -150 -seniors -to -the -courts/) 16. D.1. When a wheelchair player strikes a ball in the NVZ, on a volley, it is a fault only (hitpJ/wt ygj)u�A"baII league attracts r seniors if the larger -rear wheels contact NVZ. t an to the courts nevus/ma�VyAt .usopa onvusapa- The wheelchair is considered part of the player's body and all applicable rules that apply to a player's body will apply to n+pwUAmilborough-pickleball4eague-attmets-mom the wheelchair except In non -volley zone as listed below. It4,%&-senlora-to-tha-courts/) JY� 1$ 2016 All applicable rules which apply to standing players apply to those in a wheelchair except as listed below. '(lrFt}994www.usapa.arglusarya-n�nrslspon-of-plckleba volley, or it is a fault. I I- (�j4��lAw�9 31aYli�s-a Ween 16. B. Two Bounce Rule �sp httrt of plckleball expands In Las Vegas r ggniors- p:Ilwww.usapa.orglusapa-news/spar 16. E. Wheelchair/Standing Pickleball p�Rl hall-expands-In•las-vegas-areal) The wheelchair pickleball player is allowed two bounces of the ball on his or her side of the net. The IVY Yr, 2016 (f.usapa.orgiusapa-na[lonals8lnationalsvi€I second bounce can be anywhere inside or outside of the court boundaries. WRpj"gWgggj%doublesn 16. E.1. When a wheelchair pickleball player is playing with or against a standing person in singles or #,Stream: Mens Open 16. C. Service 16. C.1. Server shall be in stationary position, and then allowed one push before striking ball. (h�47bsapa.org/usapa-newsrpickleball-not-)use 6 W. -ball not just for grandparents anyn ttpJAvww.usapa.o rg1mapa- 16. C.2. At the time the server strikes the ball, the server shall not touch with any wheel: any baselines, n leball-notlust-far-grandparents-anymore sidelines, center lines or the extended center or sidelines. ",2 u.tpa.orgiusapa- 16. D. Non -Volley Zone (NVZ) (two bounce rule applies)brat's Behind Picklebairs Massive Grow, ( ttpJ/www.usapa.org/usapa-newslwha Ick leballs-ma sslve�growth/) N 8t(wpa.or8/usapa- 16. D.1. When a wheelchair player strikes a ball in the NVZ, on a volley, it is a fault only Iry , . , .• if the larger -rear wheels contact NVZ. Sponsor Directory 16. D.2. Upon exiting the NVZ, after striking a bounced ball, the player's larger -rear wheels must return AppareVAccessories (4) (http://www.usapa.orWbusines directory/cat/apparelaccessories/) to outside the NVZ boundaries (so no rear wheel contact is made in the NVZ) before hitting a Digital/Software Solutions (2) volley, or it is a fault. (http://www.usapa.org/business-directory/cat/digital- company/) Home/RV Resorts (2) (httpJ/www.usapa.org/business- 16. E. Wheelchair/Standing Pickleball directory/cat/homerv-resorts/) Instructionlrraining (0) (httpJ/www.usapa.org/busines� directory/catrnstructiontrain ing/) 16. E.1. When a wheelchair pickleball player is playing with or against a standing person in singles or Pickleball Retailers (14) (http://www.usapa.org/busines! directory/cat/pickleball-retailers/) doubles, the rules of pickleball for standing players shall appNto all standing players Tournaments &Tours (1) (httpJ/www.usapa.org/busine while the wheelchair pickleball rules shall apply to all wheelchair players. directory/cat/toumamertts/) Uncategorized (0) (http:Hwww.usapa.org/business- di rectory/cat/un categorized/) 16. F. Singles Wheelchair Pickleball 16. F.1. Singles play with one or both players in a wheelchair shall be played on half court. The server and the receiver shall serve, receive and playthe entire point from their respective service and receiving court Click here (http://www.usapa.org/ifp-official-rules/) to view and download a complete copy of the IFP Rule Book. In accordance with the requirements of the American with DisabilitiesAck the USAPA will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in its services, programs or activities. Share L. Like'.'�2 Share -erre, Share 12 pro -Level Sponsor USAPA Affiliate Partners ii 0 0 w NMr P AGI. 1. . � REEK ll! ABOUT The USA Pickleball Association (USAPA) was organized to promote the growth and development of pickleball, on both a national and international level. This organization provides players with official rules, tournaments, rankings and promotional materials. The USAPA is a nonprofit 501(cX3) corporation. It is governed by a board of directors who provide the guidance and infrastructure for the continued growth and development of the sport. Join now and be part of one of America's fastest growing sports! Email: geninfo@usapa.org (mailto:geninfo@usapa.org) Address: USAPA, P.O. Box 7354, Surprise, AZ 85374 Media Inquires, Click Here (/media -relations/) Buy Pickleball Nets AMIN A#YW,,Ni $139: PORraai NET 33373 (/usa pa-po rta b le -net -system/) PICKLEBALL �0 PkZdebnN us Reebok& K riK'pm "WRLI Ir,Fnllew 5 P O A T — FEATURED VIDEO PickleBall Copyright® USAPA Pickleball. Website Developed by W51 ingixlhttpl/w m.wsilog!x.com) SHOP OUR STORE P -1gK C EHRL L (http://www.usapastore.com/defauK.asp) CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD Date: ' 1 L /Agenda Item M — Name: Address: Phone: Topic: QIP Brief Summary of Comments: See Reverse CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD �L i J(v Agenda item I Date: 1j� 4.4Rk01UjNERT AItem No. 6A1 62 MINUTES OF THE JOINT REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK City Council Rohnert Park Financing Authority Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission Tuesday, November 8, 2016 Rohnert Park City Hall, Council Chamber 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California 1. CITY COUNCIL/RPFA/SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CDC JOINT REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Mayor Belforte called the joint regular meeting to order at 5:02 pm, the notice for which being legally noticed on November 3, 2016. Present: Gina Belforte, Mayor Jake Mackenzie, Vice Mayor Amy O. Ahanotu, Councilmember Joseph T. Callinan, Councilmember Pam Stafford, Councilmember Absent: None. Staff present: City Manager Jenkins, Assistant City Manager Schwartz, City Attorney Marchetta-Kenyon, Finance Director Howze, Development Services Director Pawson, Director of Public Works and Community Services McArthur, Human Resources Director Perrault, Planning Manager Beiswenger, Planner Tusinger, Building Official Bradford, Civilian Fire Marshal Thompson, Community Development Assistant Espino and Deputy City Clerk Saldanha. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Led by Riley Nichols, College Student and Petaluma Community Access (PCA) Volunteer. 4. SSU STUDENT REPORT Erin Jasper, Legislative Representative, Sonoma State University Associated Students, Inc. (SSU ASI) reported student opposition against the proposed tuition increase for the 2017- 2018 school year. Erin Jasper also shared student's concerns regarding waste management issues. City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes November 8, 2016 for City Councit/Rohnert Park Financing Authority/Successor Agency Page 2 of 6 3. PRESENTATIONS A. Presentation by Rohnert Park Health Center Rohnert Park Health Center Program Manager, Eliot Enriquez, provided a presentation regarding Rohnert Park Health Center's annul updates and shared key successes from 2015-2016 year. 5. DEPARTMENT HEAD BRIEFING A. Development Services: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Meeting Update Development Services Director Pawson provided the update. B. Public Safety: Update on 2016 Part I Crimes Public Safety Director Masterson provided a brief presentation and responded to Councilmember's questions. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes for: 1. City Council Special Meeting, October 18, 2016 2. City Council/RPFA/Successor Agency Joint Regular Meeting, October 25, 2016 B. Acceptance of Reports for: 1. City Bills/Demands for Payment dated November 8, 2016 2. RPFA- Cash Report for Month Ending September 2016 3. Housing Successor Agency- Cash Report for Month Ending September 2016 4. Successor Agency- Cash Report for Month Ending September 2016 5. City - Cash Report for Month Ending September 2016 C. City Council Resolutions for Adoption: 1. 2016-105 Approving an Addendum to the University District Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 2. 2016-106 Approving the Water Tank #8 Project and Amendments to the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Capital Improvement Program to Add the Water Tank #8 Project and Related Budget and Appropriations 3. 2016-107 Approving and Adopting the Plans and Specifications for the Alicia Park Restroom Renovation Project No. 2015-04, and Finding the Project Exempt from CEQA, and Awarding the Contract to R&C Construction 4. 2016-108 Declaring Intent to Reimburse Certain Expenditures from Proceeds of Tax -Exempt Obligations and Approving an Acquisition and Fee Funding Agreement for Bond -Funded Facilities with the California Statewide Communities Development Authority and University District LLC and Vast Oak Properties LP City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes November 8, 2016 for City Councit/Rohnert Park Financing Authority/Successor Agency Page 3 of 6 ACTION: Moved/seconded (Ahanotu/Callinan) to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried by the following unanimous 5-0 vote: AYES: Ahanotu, Callinan, Stafford, Mackenzie, and Belforte, NOS: None, ABSTAINS: None, ABSENT: None. Mayor Belforte noted that the Alicia Park Renovation Project outlined in Item 7.C.3 is expected to be completed under budget and thanked staff for their diligent efforts on this project. 8. Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Memorandum of Understanding with Sonoma County and the Sonoma County Water Agency Regarding Actions to Effectuate the Transfer of Property and Construction of a Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park Over the Anderson 128 Property Development Services Director Pawson presented the item. Recommended Action(s): By Minute Order, and subject to changes approved by the City Attorney, authorize the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with Sonoma County and the Sonoma County Water Agency regarding actions to effectuate the transfer of property and construction of a Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park over the Anderson 128 Property. Public Comment: None ACTION: By Consensus (none opposed), City Council approved the recommended action via minute order authorizing the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with Sonoma County and the Sonoma County Water Agency regarding actions to effectuate the transfer of property and construction of a Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park over the Anderson 128 Property. 9. CLOSED SESSION A. Mayor Belforte made the closed session announcement pursuant to Government Code §54957.7 and Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:45 p.m. in Conference Room 2A to Consider: 1. Conference with Legal Counsel — Anticipated Litigation - Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(d)(2): (One Case) 2. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code §54956.8) Property: Stadium Lands Lot 1 (APN: 143-040-124) City Negotiator: Darrin Jenkins, City Manager Negotiating Parties: Matt Waken, Stadium RP Development Partners, LLC and Bruce Orr, 365 Advisors, Inc. Under Negotiation: Price and Terms B. Reconvened Joint Regular Meeting Open Session in Council Chamber at 6:43 p.m. C. Report on Closed Session (Government Code § 54957.1) Mayor Belforte reported: no reportable action. City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes November 8, 2016 for City Council/Rohnert Park Financing Authority/Successor Agency Page 4 of 6 10. PUBLIC HEARING (NO EARLIER THAN 6PM — Noticed on 10/28/2016) Introduction of an Ordinance Regarding Municipal Code Amendments to Adopt Development Standards for the Priority Development Area Plan Planning Manager Beiswenger and Planner Tusinger presented the item. Recommended Action(s): Conduct a public hearing and waive first reading and introduce ordinance to amend Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) of the Rohnert Park Zoning Ordinance. Hearing Opened 6:47 p.m. Public Comments: None. Hearing Closed 6:47 p.m. ACTION: Moved/seconded (Stafford/Mackenzie) to introduce Ordinance 901 An Ordinance of the City Council of Rohnert Park, California, Amending Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) of the Zoning Ordinance to Adopt Development Standards for the Priority Development Area Plan. Title read by Mayor Belforte. Motion carried unanimously by the following 5-0 roll call vote: AYES: Ahanotu, Callinan, Stafford, Mackenzie, and Belforte, NOS: None, ABSTAINS: None, ABSENT: None. 11. PUBLIC HEARING (NO EARLIER THAN 6PM — Noticed on 10/28/2016) Introduction of an Ordinance Adopting by Reference the 2016 California Building Standards Code Including Proposed Local Amendments, Policies and Fees and Approval of a Resolution Amending Building Plan Check and Inspection Fee Schedule Development Services Director Pawson, Building Official Bradford and Civilian Fire Marshall Thompson presented the item. Recommended Action(s): Introduce for first reading by title only, an Ordinance adopting the 2016 California Building Standards Code by reference as amended to reflect local conditions and adopt a Resolution Amending Building Plan Check and Inspection Fee Schedule. Vice Mayor Mackenzie stepped away from the dais at 6:55 p.m. and returned at 7:02 p.m. Hearing Opened 7:33 p.m. Public Comments: None Hearing Closed 7:33 p.m. ACTION: Moved/seconded (Stafford/Ahanotu) to introduce Ordinance 902 An Ordinance of the City of Rohnert Park Adopting the 2016 California Building Standards Code by Reference, as Amended to Reflect Local Conditions, and Repealing Chapters 15.04 Through 15.30 and 15.36 of Title 15 "Buildings and Construction" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code and Adding Section 15.04 (General Provisions and Penalties), 15.08 (Building Code), 15.12 (Residential Code), 15.16 (Electrical Code), 15.18 City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes November 8, 2016 for City Councit/Rohnert Park Financing Authority/Successor Agency Page 5 of 6 (Mechanical Code) 15.20 (Plumbing Code), 15.22 (Energy Code) 15.24 (Existing Building Code), 15.26 (Green Building Standards Code) 15.28 (Fire Code), and 15.30 (Administrative Citations for Fireworks) to Title 15 "Buildings and Construction" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code. Title read by Mayor Belforte. Motion carried unanimously by the following 5-0 roll call vote: AYES: Ahanotu, Callinan, Stafford, Mackenzie, and Belforte, NOS: None, ABSTAINS: None, ABSENT: None. ACTION: Moved/seconded (Stafford/Ahanotu) to adopt Resolution 2016-109 Amending Building Plan Check and Inspection Fee Schedule Motion carried by the following unanimous 5-0 vote: AYES: Ahanotu, Callinan, Stafford, Mackenzie and Belforte, NOS: None, ABSTAINS: None, ABSENT: None. 12. COMMITTEE / LIAISON/ OTHER REPORTS A. Standing Committee Reports None. B. Liaison Reports 1. Water Advisory Committee (WAQ (10/4) Councilmember Callinan and Development Services Director Pawson reported that a ceremonial meeting took place honoring Supervisor Efren Carrillo. Development Services Director Pawson also reported on drought conditions and water regulations. C. Other Reports None. 13. COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Belforte reported that the Community Center will be hosting a Veterans Day celebration event on Friday, November 11th, and the featured keynote speaker is Director of Public Safety, Brian Masterson. 14. MATTERS FROM/FOR COUNCIL None. 15. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 16. CLOSED SESSION A. Mayor Belforte made the closed session announcement pursuant to Government Code §54957.7 and Council recessed to Closed Session at 7:38p.m. in Conference Room 2A to Consider: 1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code §54957.6) City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes November 8, 2016 for City Councit/Rohnert Park Financing Authority/Successor Agency Page 6 of 6 Agency designated representative(s): Darrin Jenkins, City Manager Employee Organizations: a. Service Employees' International Union (SEIU) b. Rohnert Park Employees' Association (RPEA) c. Rohnert Park Public Safety Officers' Association (RPPSOA) d. Rohnert Park Public Safety Managers' Association (RPPSMA) e. Management Unit f. Confidential Unit g. Unrepresented Employees B. Reconvened Joint Regular Meeting Open Session in Council Chamber at 8:55 p.m. C. Report on Closed Session (Government Code § 54957.1) Mayor Belforte reported: no reportable action. 17. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Belforte adjourned the joint regular meeting at 8:55 p.m. Caitlin Saldanha, Deputy City Clerk Gina Belforte, Mayor City of Rohnert Park City of Rohnert Park CITY OF ROHNERT PARK BILLS FOR ACCEPTANCE November 22, 2016 Check Numbers: 235427 - 235710 $2,621,778.29 Dated: November 1, 2016 - November 14, 2016 TOTAL $2,621,778.29 Accounts Payable Checks for Approval - ---„� User: gburke Printed: 11/15/2016- 3:25 PM `-'aLerox-t� Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235427 11/01/2016 General Fund Standard Ins Payable National Account Services 4,742.27 235427 11/01/2016 General Fund Life Ins - Retiree Med National Account Services 1,780.13 235427 11/01/2016 General Fund Short & LongTerm Disabilty Pay National Account Services 9,270.80 Check Total: 15,793.20 235428 11/01/2016 Water Utility Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -Water Friedman's Home Improvement 30.31 235428 11/01/2016 Water Utility Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -Water Friedman's Home Improvement 0.14 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.14 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 140.36 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.65 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.65 235428 11/01/2016 Water Utility Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -Water Friedman's Home Improvement 49.82 235428 11/01/2016 Water Utility Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -Water Friedman's Home Improvement 0.23 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.23 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 65.70 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 0.30 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.30 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 215.97 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 6.69 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -6.69 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 52.46 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.24 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.24 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 9.96 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.05 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.05 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Equipment < $5K - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 1,680.48 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Equipment < $5K - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 7.77 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -7.77 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 37.23 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.17 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.17 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 605.55 Page 1 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 2.80 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -2.80 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 59.42 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.27 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.27 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 137.98 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 0.63 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.63 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 667.67 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 3.08 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -3.08 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 302.28 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 1.39 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -1.39 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 158.71 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.73 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.73 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 36.43 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.16 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.16 235428 11/01/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Friedman's Home Improvement 18.64 235428 11/01/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Friedman's Home Improvement 0.09 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.09 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 135.82 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.62 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.62 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 55.19 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 0.25 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.25 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 5.09 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 0.03 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.03 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 272.38 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 1.26 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -1.26 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 26.22 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.12 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.12 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 180.25 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 0.83 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.83 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 117.36 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.54 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.54 Page 2 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 151.55 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.70 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.70 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 11.98 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 0.06 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.06 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 118.90 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.55 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.55 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 89.92 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.42 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.42 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement -126.49 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement -0.58 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement 0.58 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 28.57 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.13 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.13 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 50.69 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.24 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.24 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 172.69 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.80 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.80 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 68.95 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.31 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.31 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 54.59 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 0.25 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.25 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Self Insured Losses -Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 47.28 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Self Insured Losses -Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.21 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.21 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 121.24 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Friedman's Home Improvement 0.56 235428 11/01/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.56 Check Total: 5,851.15 235429 11/01/2016 Water Utility Fund Water Entr. /Res Util A/R Beth Cervantes 78.38 235429 11/01/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Sewer Res Util A/R Beth Cervantes 127.67 235429 11/01/2016 Sewer Utility Fund A/R -Res Sewer Util Penalties Beth Cervantes 0.03 Check Total: 206.08 Page 3 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name 235430 11/04/2016 ISF - Information Technology Telephone - IT AT&T 235431 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - RPCC AT&T 235431 11/04/2016 ISF - Information Technology Telephone - IT AT&T 235431 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - B Pool AT&T 235431 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - RPCC AT&T 235431 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PAC AT&T 235431 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PW AT&T 235431 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - RPCC AT&T 235431 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PW AT&T 235432 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Police 235432 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - FIN 235433 11/04/2016 Capital Projects Fund University Dist. Specific Plan 235433 11/04/2016 General Fund Postage & Shipping - Police 235433 11/04/2016 General Fund Postage & Shipping - DS 235434 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - AS 235434 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Sewer 235434 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - RPCC 235435 11/04/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks 235435 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks 235435 11/04/2016 General Fund Equipment < M - Parks 235435 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks 235435 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks 235435 11/04/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks 235435 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets 235436 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks 235437 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Page 4 of 40 Check Total: Check Total: EMPLOYMENT SCREENING EMPLOYMENT SCREENING Check Total.• FedEx FedEx FedEx Check Total: Friedman's Home Improvement Friedman's Home Improvement Friedman's Home Improvement Check Total: John Deere Financial John Deere Financial John Deere Financial John Deere Financial John Deere Financial John Deere Financial John Deere Financial Check Total: Landscapes Unlimited Check Total: Miracle Play Systems Check Total: Void Amount 2,703.00 2,703.00 17.94 1,022.04 37.73 37.77 171.40 35.89 57.37 17.94 1,398.08 76.00 92.60 168.60 69.69 22.31 55.54 147.54 20.61 93.78 42.11 156.50 84.44 27.22 643.77 7.56 75.76 73.78 532.17 1,444.70 520.25 520.25 693.63 693.63 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name 235438 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Redwood Lock & Key 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PW Check Total: 235439 11/04/2016 General Fund Animal Shelter Fees - AS Rebecca Sposeto 235439 11/04/2016 General Fund Animal Licence Revenue -AS Rebecca Sposeto Check Total: 235440 11/04/2016 General Fund Elections Expense -Non Deptment The Community Voice Check Total: 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Bldg -North AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Telephone - Sewer AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PW AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Telephone - Fleet AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Telephone - Sewer AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Telephone - Fleet AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Main Station AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - CH AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Main Station AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Main Station AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - AS Bldg AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - B Pool AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - H Pool AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - M Pool AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 ISF - Information Technology Telephone - IT AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PW AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Main Station AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - RPCC AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - CH AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PW AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Main Station AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - CH AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - CH AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - CH AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Bldg -North AT&T 235441 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Telephone - Sewer AT&T 235442 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Fire Costco Wholesale 235442 11/04/2016 General Fund Concession Purchases - PAC Costco Wholesale 235442 11/04/2016 General Fund Concession Purchases - PAC Costco Wholesale 235442 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - AS Costco Wholesale 235442 11/04/2016 General Fund Concession Purchases - PAC Costco Wholesale Page 5 of 40 Check Total= Void Amount 13.05 13.05 45.00 12.00 57.00 192.00 192.00 99.57 36.85 19.80 37.73 19.80 173.52 99.57 1,590.76 281.24 36.53 37.78 17.96 17.96 17.95 55.64 37.77 737.55 37.80 73.58 73.58 77.48 73.61 109.46 185.12 37.73 173.52 4,159.86 -146.71 166.43 170.56 42.54 104.29 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235442 11/04/2016 General Fund Concession Purchases - PAC Costco Wholesale 39.92 235442 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Fire Costco Wholesale 291.47 235442 11/04/2016 General Fund Concession Purchases - PAC Costco Wholesale 173.45 Check Total: 841.95 235443 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC Kathleen Robinson 364.00 Check Total: 364.00 235444 11/04/2016 General Fund Productions - Production Benjamin Acedo 200.00 Check Total: 200.00 235445 11/04/2016 General Fund POST Training & Travel -Police American River College 160.00 Check Total: 160.00 235446 11/04/2016 General Fund POST Training & Travel -Police Anaheim Marriott Suites 281.80 Check Total: 281.80 235447 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - SpC Anthony Bergland 2,502.00 Check Total: 2,502.00 235448 11/04/2016 General Fund Training & Travel - Police CAPE 275.00 Check Total: 275.00 235449 11/04/2016 General Fund License Permit & Fees - Parks Co of Sonoma Clerk 50.00 Check Total: 50.00 235450 11/04/2016 General Fund Training & Travel - Police Catherine Colburn 73.00 Check Total: 73.00 235451 11/04/2016 General Fund Meetings & Travel - Police Catherine Colburn 22.10 Check Total: 22.10 235452 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Main Station Comcast 17.67 Check Total: 17.67 235453 11/04/2016 General Fund Rec Ref Clearing Andrea Davis 200.00 Check Total: 200.00 235454 11/04/2016 General Fund Building Permit Fees Timothy Harrison 110.00 Page 6 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount Check Total: 110.00 235455 11/04/2016 General Fund Training & Travel - Police Health First Training 400.00 Check Total: 400.00 235456 11/04/2016 General Fund Rec Ref Clearing Louis Hernandez 350.00 Check Total: 350.00 235457 11/04/2016 General Fund POST Training & Travel -Police HIlton Garden Inn 708.75 235457 11/04/2016 General Fund POST Training & Travel -Police HIlton Garden Inn 748.16 Check Total: 1,456.91 235458 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC Bettyjane Hotaling 4,608.50 Check Total: 4,608.50 235459 11/04/2016 General Fund Rec Ref Clearing Ian Kennedy 400.00 Check Total: 400.00 235460 11/04/2016 General Fund Training & Travel - Fire Wes Kitchel 3,600.00 Check Total= 3,600.00 235461 11/04/2016 General Fund Exp Belforte - CC Los Cien, Inc. 25.00 235461 11/04/2016 General Fund Meetings & Travel - CM Los Cien, Inc. 25.00 Check Total_ 50.00 235462 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - SpC Julie McIntyre 225.00 Check Total.- 225.00 235463 11/04/2016 General Fund PS/ PS Services Miguel Reyes 10.00 Check Total_ 10.00 235464 11/04/2016 General Fund Productions - Production Michael Ross 200.00 Check Total: 200.00 235465 11/04/2016 General Fund POST Training & Travel -Police ANDREW SMITH 320.00 Check Total: 320.00 235466 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC Randy Snyder 1,398.00 Check Total- 1,398.00 Page 7 of 40 Check Number Check Date 235467 11/04/2016 235468 235469 235470 235470 235471 235472 235473 235473 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 235474 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 11/04/2016 Fund Name General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund Sewer Utility Fund Water Utility Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund Account Name Spec Dept Exp- Community Event POST Training & Travel -Police POST Training & Travel -Police Meetings & Travel - CM Meetings & Travel - CM Postage & Shipping - SrC PS/ PS Services Contract Svcs - SpC Contract Svcs - SpC PG&E -SpC PG&E -RPCC PG&E-BARC Repairs & Maint Routine -LBRC PG&E -PAC PGE - AS Bldg PG&E - H Pool PG&E - Sewer PG&E - Water PG&E-CHA PG&E - PS Main Station PG&E - PS Bldg -North PG&E - PS Bldg -South PG&E -PW PG&E - Streets PG&E - Parks PG&E - Gold Ridge PG&E - SrC PG&E - M Pool Page 8 of 40 Vendor Name Void Sonoma County Environmental Health Check Total: Rebecca Sotelo Check Total: CASEY THOMPSON Check Total: Town of Windsor Town of Windsor Check Total: United States Post Office Check Total: Luis Vega Dondiego Check Total: Fatima Worden Fatima Worden Check Total: Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Pacific Gas & Electric Amount 154.00 154.00 145.00 145.00 640.00 640.00 40.00 40.00 80.00 71.82 71.82 10.00 10.00 225.00 160.00 385.00 4,962.94 3,733.72 549.06 529.04 4,582.91 1,792.33 1,571.91 5,829.35 26,453.46 1,209.96 9,762.52 1,054.69 181.07 55.83 21,348.63 4,467.63 801.60 2,286.91 735.88 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name 235474 11/04/2016 General Fund PG&E - B Pool 235475 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Fire 235475 11/04/2016 General Fund Concession Purchases - PAC 235475 11/04/2016 General Fund Concession Purchases - PAC 235475 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - AS 235475 11/04/2016 General Fund Concession Purchases - PAC 235475 11/04/2016 General Fund Concession Purchases - PAC 235475 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Fire 235475 11/04/2016 General Fund Concession Purchases - PAC Vendor Name Pacific Gas & Electric Check Total: CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 235476 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Telephone - Sewer AT&T 235476 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PW AT&T 235476 11/04/2016 ISF - Information Technology Telephone - IT AT&T 235476 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Main Station AT&T 235476 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PAC AT&T 235476 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - SpC AT&T 235476 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - AS Bldg AT&T 235476 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Bldg -South AT&T 235476 11/04/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Bldg -North AT&T 235477 11/04/2016 ISF - Information Technology Telephone - IT Comcast 235478 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Janitorial Svcs - SWR 235479 11/04/2016 General Fund Advertising - Productions 235479 11/04/2016 General Fund Postage & Shipping -Production 235479 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Printing Services 235479 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund Printing - Water 235479 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Printing Services 235479 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund Printing - Water 235480 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Spec Dept Exp -Sewer 235481 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms - Fire Page 9 of 40 Check Total Check Total: Check Total ABM Janitorial North Calif -LA Check Total: Ad Vantage Marketing Ad Vantage Marketing Ad Vantage Marketing Ad Vantage Marketing Ad Vantage Marketing Ad Vantage Marketing Check Total: Alhambra & Sierra Springs Check Total: All Star Fire Equipment, Inc. Void Amount 288.29 92,197.73 -146.71 166.43 170.56 42.54 104.29 39.92 291.47 173.45 841.95 19.82 37.77 37.77 19.82 19.82 73.73 37.92 37.77 37.77 322.19 240.91 240.91 133.37 133.37 564.27 1,245.85 91.24 91.25 46.63 46.63 2,085.87 68.95 68.95 266.51 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235482 11/04/2016 General Fund Medications - AS Amatheon, Inc. Check Total: 266.51 183.74 Check Total: 1,067.63 235484 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - RPCC Check Total: 183.74 235483 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Spec Dept Exp - Fleet Aramark Uniform Services 29.00 235483 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Fleet Aramark Uniform Services 246.55 235483 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Fleet Aramark Uniform Services 27.16 235483 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -PW Aramark Uniform Services 41.84 235483 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Sewer Aramark Uniform Services 30.68 235483 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Water Aramark Uniform Services 34.28 235483 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks Aramark Uniform Services 14.57 235483 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks Aramark Uniform Services 7.10 235483 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks Aramark Uniform Services 46.54 235483 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine-ASBIdg Aramark Uniform Services 140.08 235483 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Fleet Aramark Uniform Services 27.16 235483 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -PW Aramark Uniform Services 41.84 235483 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Sewer Aramark Uniform Services 30.68 235483 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Water Aramark Uniform Services 34.28 235483 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Street Aramark Uniform Services 14.57 235483 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks Aramark Uniform Services 7.10 235483 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks Aramark Uniform Services 46.54 235483 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine - CH Aramark Uniform Services 247.66 Check Total: 1,067.63 235484 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - RPCC Associated Services 8.00 Check Total: 8.00 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 30.85 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 0.14 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable The Barricade Company -0.14 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 277.66 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 1.28 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable The Barricade Company -1.28 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks The Barricade Company 345.08 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks The Barricade Company 1.25 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable The Barricade Company -1.25 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 398.36 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable The Barricade Company -1.84 235485 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 1.84 Check Total: Page 10 of 40 1,051.95 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235486 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - PAC Beacon Fire Protection 1,000.00 Check Total: 1,000.00 235487 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Police Bettin Investigations 1,673.82 235487 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Police Bettin Investigations 1,569.12 Check Total: 3,242.94 235488 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC BOLT STAFFING SERVICE, INC. 637.43 235488 11/04/2016 General Fund Janitorial Svcs - SrC BOLT STAFFING SERVICE, INC. 328.48 235488 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - FIN BOLT STAFFING SERVICE, INC. 1,133.20 Check Total: 2,099.11 235489 11/04/2016 Permanent-Spreckles Donation: Equip over $5K - Endowmt Brokaw Design 3,500.00 235489 11/04/2016 Capital Projects Fund PR -76a A Park Restroom Brokaw Design 1,842.25 Check Total: 5,342.25 235490 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - RPCC CA Department of Justice 112.00 235490 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - SpC CA Department of Justice 96.00 235490 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - H Pool CA Department of Justice 21.34 235490 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - M Pool CA Department of Justice 21.32 235490 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Police CA Department of Justice 1,020.00 235490 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - FIN CA Department of Justice 64.00 235490 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Parks CA Department of Justice 48.00 235490 11/04/2016 General Fund Recruitment - B Pool CA Department of Justice 21.34 Check Total: 1,404.00 235491 11/04/2016 ISF - Information Technology Spec Dept Exp - IT CDW Government 92.66 235491 11/04/2016 ISF - Information Technology Spec Dept Exp - IT CDW Government 59.15 Check Total: 151.81 235492 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets City Electric Supply 1.883.55 235492 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets City Electric Supply 8.70 235492 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable City Electric Supply -8.70 Check Total: 1,883.55 235493 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Code Source 15,013.96 235493 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Code Source 6,885.00 235493 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Code Source 530.00 Check Total: 22,428.96 235494 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine - PW Comcast 26.89 Page 11 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name 235495 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - PW 235496 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Contractual Svs -Sewer 235496 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - Streets 235496 11/04/2016 Casino Public Service Contract Svcs - RPSC 235496 11/04/2016 Wilfred Widening Maintenc JE Contractual Svcs Wilfred JEPA 235496 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - Streets 235497 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine - CH 235498 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Spec Dept Exp -Sewer 235498 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - PW 235498 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - PW 235498 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable 235499 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Rep NonDeptmtl - Fleet 235500 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - RPCC 235500 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - SrC 235500 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - SrC Vendor Name Check Total: Complete Welders Supply Check Total: DC Electric Group Inc. DC Electric Group Inc. DC Electric Group Inc. DC Electric Group Inc. DC Electric Group Inc. Check Total: ENERGY PLUS Check Total: Eureka Oxygen Co. Eureka Oxygen Co. Eureka Oxygen Co. Eureka Oxygen Co. Check Total_ Fastenal Check Total: Fishman Supply Company Fishman Supply Company Fishman Supply Company Check Total: 235501 11/04/2016 General Fund Gas & Oil - Police Flyers Energy 235501 11/04/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 235501 11/04/2016 General Fund Gas & Oil - Police Flyers Energy 235501 11/04/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 235501 11/04/2016 General Fund Diesel Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 235501 11/04/2016 General Fund Gas & Oil - Fire Flyers Energy 235501 11/04/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 235501 11/04/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy Check Total: 235502 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine-PSMain Friedman's Home Improvement 235502 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine-PSMain Friedman's Home Improvement 235502 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement Page 12 of 40 Void Amount 26.89 52.51 52.51 986.00 4,803.82 443.43 147.81 4,222.71 10,603.77 500.42 500.42 71.60 185.10 -1.84 1.84 256.70 11.86 11.86 50.10 60.90 30.36 141.36 415.58 867.10 719.95 1,151.90 876.25 987.24 723.55 718.10 6,459.67 22.22 0.11 -0.11 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235502 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine - SrC Friedman's Home Improvement 74.83 235502 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine - SrC Friedman's Home Improvement 0.35 235502 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.35 Check Total: 97.05 235503 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - AS Frizelle-Enos Company 242.40 235503 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - AS Frizelle-Enos Company 1.00 235503 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Frizelle-Enos Company -1.00 235503 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - AS Frizelle-Enos Company 414.38 235503 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - AS Frizelle-Enos Company 1.79 235503 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Frizelle-Enos Company -1.79 Check Total: 656.78 235504 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet GCR Tires & Service 232.70 Check Total 232.70 235505 11/04/2016 General Fund Police/Armory - Police Glock Professional Inc 781.91 Check Total: 781.91 235506 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Rep NonDeptmtl - Fleet Grainger, Inc. -87.75 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Streets Grainger, Inc. 123.72 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Streets Grainger, Inc. 28.92 235506 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Small Tools - Sewer Grainger, Inc. 56.68 235506 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund Small Tools - Water Grainger, Inc. 89.15 235506 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund Small Tools - Water Grainger, Inc. 113.44 235506 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -Water Grainger, Inc. -319.69 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund - Spec Dept Exp - Streets Grainger, Inc. 224.59 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -RPCC Grainger, Inc. 71.80 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - PW Grainger, Inc. 419.24 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund Equipment < $5K - SpC Grainger, Inc. 249.58 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -RPCC Grainger, Inc. 2.48 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Grainger, Inc. 194.97 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Grainger, Inc. 224.59 235506 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund Small Tools - Water Grainger, Inc. 43.32 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Grainger, Inc. 46.90 235506 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -Parks Grainger, Inc. 9.38 Check Total: 1,491.32 235507 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet Hansel Ford 14.66 Check Total: 14.66 235508 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Hawley's Paint Store, Inc. 7.56 Page 13 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name 235508 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Hawley's Paint Store, Inc. 235508 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Hawley's Paint Store, Inc. Check Total: 235509 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 235509 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 235509 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL Check Total: 235510 11/04/2016 General Fund Medications - AS Henry Schein Animal Health 235510 11/04/2016 General Fund Spay/Ntr Fd Eligible Exp- AS Henry Schein Animal Health 235510 11/04/2016 General Fund Medications - AS Henry Schein Animal Health 235510 11/04/2016 General Fund Medications - AS Henry Schein Animal Health Check Total: 235511 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control Check Total: 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Horizon 235512 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon Check Total: 235513 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Small Tools - Sewer Instrument Technology Corp Check Total: 235514 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Equipment < $5K - Sewer JWC Environmental LLC 235514 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Equip over $5K - Sewer JWC Environmental LLC 235514 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Equip over $5K - Sewer JWC Environmental LLC 235514 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable JWC Environmental LLC Page 14 of 40 Void Amount 215.71 51.55 274.82 53.04 0.25 -0.25 53.04 189.23 135.62 216.86 66.23 607.94 75.00 75.00 0.06 -0.06 12.90 -0.39 0.39 -84.22 1.36 -1.36 293.14 0.80 -0.80 174.87 0.65 -0.65 141.94 538.63 271.88 271.88 37,262.00 24,187.97 -0.03 0.03 Check Number Check Date Fund Name 235515 11/04/2016 General Fund 235516 11/04/2016 General Fund 235517 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235518 11/04/2016 General Fund 235518 11/04/2016 General Fund 235519 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund 235520 11/04/2016 General Fund 235520 11/04/2016 General Fund 235521 11/04/2016 General Fund 235521 11/04/2016 General Fund 235521 11/04/2016 General Fund 235521 11/04/2016 General Fund 235522 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235523 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund 235523 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund 235523 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund 235523 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund 235524 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund 235525 11/04/2016 General Fund Account Name Spec Dept Exp - Streets Contract Svcs - Police Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet Advertising - Productions Advertising - Productions Repairs & Maint Routine -Sewer Recruitment - SpC Recruitment - Parks Office Supplies - RPCC Office Supplies - RPCC Office Supplies - PW Spec Dept Exp - PW Veh Repairs for Water -Fleet Small Tools - Water Small Tools - Water SystemRepair - Water SystemRepair - Water PG&E - Water Concession Purchases - SpC Page 15 of 40 Vendor Name Check Total: Kelly Moore Paint Company, Inc Check Total: Kone Inc Check Total: Nardsons Enterprises, Inc. Check Total: North Bay Bohemian North Bay Bohemian Check Total: Northgate Company Inc. Check Total: Occupational Health Centers of Califoi Occupational Health Centers of Califoi Check Total: Office Depot Office Depot Office Depot Office Depot Check Total: Opperman & Son, Inc. Check Total: Pace Supply Pace Supply Pace Supply Pace Supply Check Total: Pacific Gas & Electric Check Total: Pepsi-Cola Void Amount 61,449.97 47.72 47.72 110.39 110.39 390.00 390.00 278.00 278.00 556.00 295.00 295.00 157.50 76.00 233.50 26.87 11.71 257.99 54.36 350.93 299.89 299.89 109.84 102.12 184.88 -112.50 284.34 3,363.45 3,363.45 278.61 Check Number Check Date Fund Name 235526 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235526 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235527 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235527 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235527 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235528 11/04/2016 General Fund 235528 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund 235528 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund 235529 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235529 11/04/2016 General Fund 235529 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund 235530 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund 235530 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund 235530 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund 235531 11/04/2016 General Fund 235532 11/04/2016 General Fund 235532 11/04/2016 General Fund 235533 11/04/2016 General Fund 235534 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235534 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235534 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235534 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet 235534 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount Check Total: 278.61 Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet Platinum Chevrolet 82.65 Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet Platinum Chevrolet 82.81 Check Total_ 165.46 Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet Powerplan 170.40 Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet Powerplan 42.42 Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet Powerplan 39.42 Check Total: 252.24 Uniforms - Fire Red Wing Shoes 241.40 Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Sewer Red Wing Shoes 225.10 Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Water Red Wing Shoes 300.00 Check Total: 766.50 Repairs & Maint Routine -Fleet Redwood Lock & Key 13.05 Repairs & Maint Routine-ASBIdg Redwood Lock & Key 619.20 Repairs & Maint Routine -Water Redwood Lock & Key 11.96 Check Total: 644.21 SystemRepair - Water Reliable Hardware & Steel Co. 23.32 SystemRepair - Water Reliable Hardware & Steel Co. 186.10 Spec Dept Exp - Water Reliable Hardware & Steel Co. 142.75 Check Total: 352.17 Self Insured Losses -Parks Ross Recreation Equipment, Inc. 2,506.91 Check Total. 2,506.91 Contract Svcs - Parks Roto -Rooter Plumbers 834.00 Contract Svcs - RPCC Roto -Rooter Plumbers 275.75 Check Total: 1,109.75 Spec Dept Exp - Streets Rydin Decal 816.30 Check Total: 816.30 Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 478.87 Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 10.31 Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 52.47 Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 26.08 Veh Repairs for Fire -Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 10.31 Page 16 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235534 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 30.31 235534 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 13.01 Check Total: 621.36 235535 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms - Police Santa Rosa Uniform & Career Apparel 76.07 235535 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms - Fire Santa Rosa Uniform & Career Apparel 285.80 235535 11/04/2016 General Fund Uniforms - Police Santa Rosa Uniform & Career Apparel 271.66 Check Total: 633.53 235536 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Shamrock Materials 192.55 235536 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Shamrock Materials -0.88 235536 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Shamrock Materials 0.88 Check Total: 192.55 235537 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Six Robblees' Inc. 33.18 Check Total: 33.18 235538 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police-Fleet Smothers 61.11 235538 11/04/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police-Fleet Smothers -0.14 235538 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Smothers 0.14 Check Total: 61.11 235539 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 0.52 235539 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Syar Industries, Inc. -0.52 235539 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 111.93 235539 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 1.86 235539 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Syar Industries, Inc. -1.86 235539 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 402.14 235539 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries. Inc. 0.50 235539 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Syar Industries, Inc. -0.50 235539 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 107.97 235539 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 0.55 235539 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Syar Industries, Inc. -0.55 235539 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 118.86 235539 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 0.50 235539 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Syar Industries, Inc. -0.50 235539 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 106.97 Check Total: 847.87 235540 11/04/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine - SrC Tap Plastics Inc 280.58 Check Total: 280.58 Page 17 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235541 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - Police Transunion Risk & Alternative 25.00 Check Total: 25.00 235542 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - RPCC Trope Group 4,639.28 Check Total: 4,639.28 235543 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - Parks UCPNB 2,083.33 235543 11/04/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC UCPNB 416.67 Check Total: 2,500.00 235544 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets United Forest Products, Inc. 2.60 235544 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable United Forest Products, Inc. -2.60 235544 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets United Forest Products, Inc. 562.90 Check Total: 562.90 235545 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp -BARC WEST COUNTY TRANSPORTATIO 1,048.91 Check Total: 1,048.91 235546 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Wheeler Zamaroni 349.11 235546 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Wheeler Zamaroni 1.61 235546 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Wheeler Zamaroni -1.61 235546 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Wheeler Zamaroni 141.68 235546 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Wheeler Zamaroni 0.65 235546 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Wheeler Zamaroni -0.65 235546 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Wheeler Zamaroni 94.45 235546 11/04/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Wheeler Zamaroni 0.43 235546 11/04/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Wheeler Zamaroni -0.43 235546 11/04/2016 Sewer Utility Fund SystemRepair - Sewer Wheeler Zamaroni 437.72 235546 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Wheeler Zamaroni 496.44 235546 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Wheeler Zamaroni 354.53 Check Total: 1,873.93 235547 11/04/2016 Water Utility Fund Small Tools - Water Wyatt Irrigation Co. 419.78 Check Total: 419.78 235548 11/09/2016 RP Fountation Trust Fund Lic Permits & Fees PAC -RP Foud CA Alcohol Beverage Control 450.00 Check Total: 450.00 235549 11/09/2016 ISF - Information Technology Office Equip - IT Lynbrook 12,442.74 Check Total: 12,442.74 Page 18 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235550 11/10/2016 General Fund Def Comp Payable-Gw Nationwide Retirement Solutions 200.00 235550 11/10/2016 General Fund Def Comp Payable-Gw Nationwide Retirement Solutions 400.00 Check Total: 600.00 235551 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund EDD - PW WTR CA EDD Dept 1,312.00 235551 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund EDD - PW WW CA EDD Dept 1,148.00 235551 11/10/2016 General Fund EDD - PW CA EDD Dept 820.00 235551 11/10/2016 General Fund EDD - DS CA EDD Dept 6,300.00 235551 11/10/2016 General Fund EDD - Parks CA EDD Dept 1,016.00 235551 11/10/2016 General Fund EDD - Parks CA EDD Dept 420.00 Check Total: 11,016.00 235552 11/10/2016 General Fund Court Order Payable CA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 484.02 Check Total: 484.02 235553 11/10/2016 General Fund HSABank Payable HSA Bank 1,153.00 Check Total: 1,153.00 235554 11/10/2016 General Fund Kaiser W/H Payable KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC 94,535.30 235554 11/10/2016 General Fund Kaiser W/H Payable KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC 14,687.95 235554 11/10/2016 General Fund Kaiser W/H Payable KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC 21,215.88 235554 11/10/2016 General Fund Kaiser Hlth Ins - Retiree Med KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC 34,494.83 235554 11/10/2016 General Fund Kaiser Hlth Ins - Retiree Med KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC 16,544.01 235554 11/10/2016 General Fund Kaiser Hlth Ins - Retiree Med KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC 33,683.24 235554 11/10/2016 General Fund Kaiser Hlth Ins - Retiree Med KAISER HEALTH PLAN INC 1,392.24 Check Total: 216,553.45 235555 11/10/2016 General Fund Prepaid Legal Services Legal Shield 67.75 Check Total: 67.75 235556 11/10/2016 General Fund PORAC LTD Payable MYERS-STEVENS & CO, INC 1,311.50 Check Total: 1,311.50 235557 11/10/2016 General Fund Def Comp Payable-Gw Nationwide Retirement Solutions 1,521.25 Check Total: 1,521.25 235558 11/10/2016 General Fund Def Comp Payable-Gw Nationwide Retirement Solutions 2,940.84 235558 11/10/2016 General Fund Def Comp Payable-Gw Nationwide Retirement Solutions 1,750.00 Check Total: 4,690.84 235559 11/10/2016 General Fund Rpea Dues CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 615.00 Page 19 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name 235560 235561 235562 235562 235562 235562 235562 235562 235562 235563 235564 235565 235565 235565 235565 235565 235566 235566 235566 235566 235567 235568 235568 11/10/2016 General Fund 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund Sewer Utility Fund General Fund Sewer Utility Fund Water Utility Fund General Fund General Fund Water Utility Fund General Fund General Fund Account Name Scope Dues Payable United Way Payable Eye CareNSP/Payables Eye CareNSP/Payables Eye Care - Retiree Med Eye Care - Retiree Med Eye Care - Retiree Med Eye Care - Retiree Med Eye Care - Retiree Med POST Training & Travel -Police POST Training & Travel -Police Janitorial Svc -PS Main Station Contract Svcs - PW Janitorial Services - CH Contractual Svs -Sewer Contract Svcs - Gold Ridge Printing Services Printing - Water Printing Services - Finance Printing Services - Finance Water Conservation Measures Spec Dept Exp - RPCC Spec Dept Exp - RPCC Page 20 of 40 Vendor Name Check Total: SEIU Local 1021 Check Total; United Way Check Total: Vision Service Plan - (CA) Vision Service Plan - (CA) Vision Service Plan - (CA) Vision Service Plan - (CA) Vision Service Plan - (CA) Vision Service Plan - (CA) Vision Service Plan - (CA) Check Total: HIlton Garden Inn Check Total: HIlton Garden Inn Check Total: ABM Janitorial North Calif -LA ABM Janitorial North Calif -LA ABM Janitorial North Calif -LA ABM Janitorial North Calif -LA ABM Janitorial North Calif -LA Check Total: Ad Vantage Marketing Ad Vantage Marketing Ad Vantage Marketing Ad Vantage Marketing Check Total: AM Conservation Group Inc Check Total: Aramark Uniform Services Aramark Uniform Services Void Amount 615.00 1,204.57 1,204.57 43.26 43.26 840.49 509.58 504.56 95.36 4.76 413.25 1,903.64 4,271.64 708.75 708.75 748.16 748.16 1,767.00 263.00 803.00 133.37 1,084.32 4,050.69 102.45 102.45 147.76 81.56 434.22 1,413.51 1,413.51 101.39 101.39 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235568 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Street Aramark Uniform Services 14.57 235568 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks Aramark Uniform Services 7.10 235568 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks Aramark Uniform Services 46.54 235568 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Fleet Aramark Uniform Services 27.16 235568 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -PW Aramark Uniform Services 41.84 235568 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Sewer Aramark Uniform Services 30.68 235568 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Water Aramark Uniform Services 34.28 235568 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Street Aramark Uniform Services 14.57 235568 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks Aramark Uniform Services 7.10 235568 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks Aramark Uniform Services 46.54 Check Total: 473.16 235569 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - RPCC Associated Services 32.95 Check Total: 32.95 235570 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Bldg -North AT&T 615.48 Check Total: 615.48 235571 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Equip over $5K - Sewer B&H Photo 2,299.00 Check Total: 2,299.00 235572 11/10/2016 General Fund Small Tools - Parks B.W.S. Distributors, Inc 199.72 235572 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks B.W.S. Distributors, Inc 208.42 Check Total: 408.14 235573 11/10/2016 General Fund Printing Svcs - NonDept BARLOW PRINTING, INC. 1,479.00 Check Total: 1,479.00 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Equipment Rental - Streets The Barricade Company 300.00 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 594.02 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 43.19 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 0.20 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable The Barricade Company -0.20 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 1,511.71 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 6.98 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable The Barricade Company -6.98 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 373.46 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 1.73 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable The Barricade Company -1.73 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 53.85 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets The Barricade Company 0.25 235574 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable The Barricade Company -0.25 Page 21 of 40 Check Number Check Date 235574 11/10/2016 235574 11/10/2016 235574 11/10/2016 235574 11/10/2016 235574 11/10/2016 235574 11/10/2016 235575 235575 235575 235576 235577 235578 235579 235579 235579 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 Fund Name General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund Sewer Utility Fund General Fund ISF - Fleet ISF - Fleet ISF - Fleet General Fund Account Name Spec Dept Exp - Streets Spec Dept Exp - Streets Sales Tax Payable Spec Dept Exp - Streets Spec Dept Exp - Streets Sales Tax Payable Self Insured Losses -Parks Self Insured Losses -Parks Sales Tax Payable License Permit & Fees - Sewer Contract Svcs - AS Veh Repairs for Water -Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet Sales Tax Payable 235580 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - FIN 235580 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Contractual Svs -Sewer 235580 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Contractual Svs - Water 235580 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - SrC 235580 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - FIN 235580 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Contractual Svs - Water 235580 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Contractual Svs -Sewer 235581 11/10/2016 General Fund 235581 11/10/2016 General Fund 235581 11/10/2016 General Fund 235581 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - CH Repairs & Maint Routine-ASBIdg Supplies Exp- PS Main Station Spec Dept Exp - CH Page 22 of 40 Vendor Name The Barricade Company The Barricade Company The Barricade Company The Barricade Company The Barricade Company The Barricade Company Check Total: Bartley Pump, Inc Bartley Pump, Inc Bartley Pump, Inc Check Total: Bay Area Air Quality Management Check Total: Bay Area Sound & Security Inc. Check Total: Big O Tires Check Total: BK Upholstery BK Upholstery BK Upholstery Check Total: BOLT STAFFING SERVICE, INC. BOLT STAFFING SERVICE, INC. BOLT STAFFING SERVICE, INC. BOLT STAFFING SERVICE, INC. BOLT STAFFING SERVICE. INC. BOLT STAFFING SERVICE, INC. BOLT STAFFING SERVICE, INC. Check Total: Buchanan Food Service Buchanan Food Service Buchanan Food Service Buchanan Food Service Check Total Void Amount 224.08 1.03 -1.03 108.25 0.50 -0.50 3,208.56 930.95 4.30 -4.30 930.95 569.00 569.00 149.85 149.85 79.99 79.99 450.00 -0.32 0.32 450.00 1,133.20 478.24 478.24 246.36 906.56 478.24 478.24 4,199.08 120.24 122.04 273.48 90.07 605.83 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235582 11/10/2016 General Fund Legal Svcs - Legal Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 4,150.64 235582 11/10/2016 General Fund Legal Svcs - Legal Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 5.024.24 235582 11/10/2016 Rent Appeals Board Legal Svcs - RAB/Non-Petition Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 2,433.60 235582 11/10/2016 Capital Projects Fund Sonoma Mtn Village Project Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 3,590.60 235582 11/10/2016 Capital Projects Fund Southeast Dist. Specific Plan Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 2,477.80 235582 11/10/2016 Capital Projects Fund University Dist. Specific Plan Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 5.720.00 235582 11/10/2016 General Fund Legal Svcs - Legal Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 245.44 235582 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Legal Svcs - Sewer Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 513.00 235582 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Legal Svcs - Water Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 644.00 235582 11/10/2016 Successor Agency Housing Fun Legal Svcs - Housing Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 1.867.32 235582 11/10/2016 General Fund Legal Svcs - Legal Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 153.40 235582 11/10/2016 Capital Projects Fund Southeast Dist. Specific Plan Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 10,194.97 235582 11/10/2016 General Fund Developer Refundable Deposits Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 3,538.60 235582 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 1,742.52 235582 11/10/2016 Rent Appeals Board Legal Svcs - RAB/Non-Petition Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 974.98 235582 11/10/2016 General Fund Developer Refundable Deposits Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 873.60 Check Total: 44,144.71 235583 11/10/2016 General Fund Strong Motion Fees Cat 1 - DS CA Department of Conservation 460.41 235583 11/10/2016 General Fund Strong Motion Cat 2 - DS CA Department of Conservation 1,075.20 235583 11/10/2016 General Fund Strong Motion CA Department of Conservation -76.78 Check Total. 1,458.83 235584 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - Streets CA Dept. of Transportation 1,200.62 Check Total: 1,200.62 235585 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Contractual Svs - Water Caltest Analytical Laboratory 7,446.10 Check Total: 7,446.10 235586 11/10/2016 General Fund Police/Armory - Police City of Fairfield 1,425.00 Check Total: 1,425.00 235587 11/10/2016 ISF - Information Technology Spec Dept Exp - IT CMS Communications Inc 482.53 235587 11/10/2016 ISF - Information Technology Spec Dept Exp - IT CMS Communications Inc 1.98 235587 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable CMS Communications Inc -1.98 235587 11/10/2016 ISF - Information Technology Spec Dept Exp - IT CMS Communications Inc 517.52 235587 11/10/2016 ISF - Information Technology Spec Dept Exp - IT CMS Communications Inc 40.43 235587 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable CMS Communications Inc -40.43 Check Total: 1.000.05 235588 11/10/2016 General Fund Printing Services - Finance Co of Sonoma Information Svstems Di 184.47 Page 23 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount Check Total: 184.47 235589 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Code Source 103.35 235589 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Code Source 846.30 235589 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Code Source 330.00 235589 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Code Source 341.90 235589 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Code Source 303.22 235589 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Code Source 200.00 235589 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Code Source 395.85 Check Total: 2,520.62 235590 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - SpC Comcast 19.54 235590 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Bldg -South Comcast 6.12 235590 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - SrC Comcast 51.07 235590 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Bldg -North Comcast 4.33 235590 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - CH Comcast 42.97 235590 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - B Pool Comcast 155.91 Check Total: 279.94 235591 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - NonDept COMMUNICATION LEASING 97.48 Check Total: 97.48 235592 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - AS Complete Welders Supply 76.56 Check Total: 76.56 235593 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - Police Cream's South Towing 1,500.00 Check Total: 1,500.00 235594 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - Fire CSG Consultants Inc 577.50 Check Total: 577.50 235595 11/10/2016 Capital Projects Fund Sonoma Mtn Village Project Dudek 1,365.00 235595 11/10/2016 General Fund Developer Refundable Deposits Dudek 8,252.70 235595 11/10/2016 General Fund 2297 Revenue - DS Dudek -8,252.70 235595 11/10/2016 General Fund 2297 Expenses - DS Dudek 8,252.70 235595 11/10/2016 General Fund Developer Refundable Deposits Dudek 1,518.80 235595 11/10/2016 General Fund 2297 Revenue - DS Dudek -1,518.80 235595 11/10/2016 General Fund 2297 Expenses - DS Dudek 1,518.80 235595 11/10/2016 Capital Projects Fund University Dist. Specific Plan Dudek 1,995.60 235595 11/10/2016 Capital Projects Fund University Dist. Specific Plan Dudek 14,692.50 Check Total: 27,824.60 235596 11/10/2016 General Fund Recruitment - FIN EMPLOYMENT SCREENING 104.60 Page 24 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235596 11/10/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Police EMPLOYMENT SCREENING 188.70 235596 11/10/2016 Casino Public Service Recruitment - RPSC EMPLOYMENT SCREENING 104.60 Check Total: 397.90 235597 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - H Pool Eureka Oxygen Co. 143.30 235597 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - SrC Eureka Oxygen Co. 26.00 235597 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - H Pool Eureka Oxygen Co. 205.19 Check Total: 374.49 235598 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - PW Fastenal 396.26 235598 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Fastenal 53.90 235598 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Fastenal 0.25 235598 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Fastenal -0.25 235598 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Rep NonDeptmtl - Fleet Fastenal 71.93 235598 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - PW Fastenal 26.46 Check Total: 548.55 235599 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - CH First Alarm Securities Services 41.78 235599 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - SpC First Alarm Securities Services 109.00 Check Total: 150.78 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Fishman Supply Company 59.54 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Fishman Supply Company 0.27 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Fishman Supply Company -0.27 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp -BARC Fishman Supply Company 137.71 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Gold Ridge Fishman Supply Company 137.71 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - RPCC Fishman Supply Company 58.43 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - SrC Fishman Supply Company 87.98 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - SrC Fishman Supply Company 73.73 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -PAC Fishman Supply Company 8.69 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - H Pool Fishman Supply Company 321.03 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - H Pool Fishman Supply Company 143.55 235600 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - SrC Fishman Supply Company 94.47 Check Total: 1.122.84 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 1.039.88 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Gas & Oil - Police Flyers Energy 547.56 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Gas & Oil - Police Flyers Energy 458.81 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 559.99 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms - Police Flyers Energy 434.15 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 630.57 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms - Police Flyers Energy 716.54 Page 25 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 931.51 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms - Police Flyers Energy 775.86 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Gas & Oil - Fire Flyers Energy 1,061.92 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 915.53 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 563.52 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Gas & Oil - Police Flyers Energy 704.39 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 774.83 235601 11/10/2016 General Fund Unleaded Fuel Inventory Flyers Energy 562.60 Check Total: 10.677.66 235602 11/10/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Police Fogle Consulting 1.525.00 235602 11/10/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Police Fogle Consulting 1.525.00 235602 11/10/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Police Fogle Consulting 1,525.00 Check Total: 4,575.00 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 17.51 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 0.09 235603 ' 1/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.09 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs &Maint Routine - PS -N Friedman's Home Improvement 28.20 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs &Maint Routine - PS -N Friedman's Home Improvement 0.13 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.13 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine-PSMain Friedman's Home Improvement 4.96 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine-PSMain Friedman's Home Improvement 0.02 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.02 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -BARC Friedman's Home Improvement 8.22 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -BARC Friedman's Home Improvement 0.03 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.03 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 205.68 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Friedman's Home Improvement 0.95 235603 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Friedman's Home Improvement -0.95 Check Total: 264.57 235604 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Streets -Fleet GCR Tires & Service 544.92 235604 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet GCR Tires & Service 140.49 235604 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet GCR Tires & Service 800.24 235604 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Water -Fleet GCR Tires & Service 544.92 235604 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Water -Fleet GCR Tires & Service 242.24 235604 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet GCR Tires & Service 147.41 235605 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Sewer --Fleet Page 26 of 40 Check Total General Equipment Maintenance 2,420.22 7,556.67 Check Number Check Date Fund Name 235606 11/10/2016 Capital Projects Fund Account Name PR -73 PAC HVAC Replacement Vendor Name GHD Check Total: Page 27 of 40 Void Amount 7,556.67 6,205.28 6,205.28 305.00 305.00 14.60 183.51 41.51 69.22 103.15 108.14 362.18 15.18 7.07 203.76 88.91 148.40 15.41 20.57 37.22 66.16 14.89 224.59 9.16 92.00 1,825.63 300.00 300.00 700.00 100.00 1,400.00 1,557.66 -652.50 905.16 3,750.00 Check Total: 235607 11/10/2016 General Fund Dues & Subscription - FIN Government Finance Officers Associal Check Total: 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine - PW Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - PW Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -RPCC Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - AS Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine - PW Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -PAC Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Parks Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -PAC Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Spec Dept Exp -Sewer Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - PW Grainger, Inc. 235608 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Spec Dept Exp -Sewer Grainger, Inc. Check Total: 235609 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - NonDept Granicus. Inc. 235609 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - NonDept Granicus, Inc. 235609 11/10/2016 ISF - Information Technology Contract Svcs - IT Granicus, Inc. 235609 11/10/2016 ISF - Information Technology Contract Svcs - IT Granicus, Inc. Check Total: 235610 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet Hansel Ford 235610 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet Hansel Ford Check Total: 235611 11/10/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Police Michael T. Hardin Investigations Page 27 of 40 Void Amount 7,556.67 6,205.28 6,205.28 305.00 305.00 14.60 183.51 41.51 69.22 103.15 108.14 362.18 15.18 7.07 203.76 88.91 148.40 15.41 20.57 37.22 66.16 14.89 224.59 9.16 92.00 1,825.63 300.00 300.00 700.00 100.00 1,400.00 1,557.66 -652.50 905.16 3,750.00 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount Check I otal: 3,750.00 235612 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Hawkins Traffic Safety Supply 542.03 235612 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Hawkins Traffic Safety Supply -3.72 235612 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Hawkins Traffic Safety Supply 3.72 Check I otal: 542.03 235613 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL -642.36 235613 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL -2.97 235613 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 2.97 235613 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Small Tools - Water HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 184.00 235613 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Small Tools - Water HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 0.85 235613 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL -0.85 235613 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -Water HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 134.77 235613 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -Water HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 0.62 235613 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL -0.62 235613 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Storm Drains HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 474.34 235613 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Storm Drains HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 2.17 235613 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL -2.17 235613 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -Water HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 162.46 235613 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -Water HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL 0.75 235613 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL -0.75 Check Total: 313.21 235614 11/10/2016 General Fund Medications - AS Henry Schein Animal Health 136.56 235614 11/10/2016 General Fund Medications - AS Henry Schein Animal Health 435.20 Check Total: 571.76 235615 11/10/2016 General Fund Shelter Food - AS Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, Inc 106.97 235615 11/10/2016 General Fund Shelter Food - AS Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, Inc 63.48 Check Total: 170.45 235616 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - B Pool The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control 175.00 235616 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine-ASBIdg The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control 80.00 235616 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - BARC The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control 60.00 235616 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC The Hitmen Termite & Pest Control 75.00 Check Total: 390.00 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 84.22 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 0.39 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Horizon -0.39 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon -77.16 23561', 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon -0.36 Page 28 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Horizon 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Horizon 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Horizon 235617 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Horizon Check Total: 235618 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Spec Dept Exp - Water Hotsy Pacific 235618 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Spec Dept Exp - Water Hotsy Pacific 235618 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Hotsy Pacific Check Total: 235619 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Equipment Rental - Water JIM -N -I RENTALS Check Total: 235620 11/10/2016 General Fund Equip Lease - SrC KBA Docusys Inc 235620 11/10/2016 General Fund Equip Lease - SpC KBA Docusys Inc 235620 11/10/2016 General Fund Equip Lease - CH KBA Docusys Inc 235620 11/10/2016 General Fund Equip Lease - AS KBA Docusys Inc 235620 11/10/2016 General Fund Equip Lease - PAC KBA Docusys Inc 235620 11/10/2016 General Fund Equip Lease - PW KBA Docusys Inc 235620 11/10/2016 General Fund Equip Lease - Police KBA Docusys Inc 235620 11/10/2016 General Fund Equip Lease - RPCC KBA Docusys Inc Check Total: 235621 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Kelly Moore Paint Company, Inc 235621 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Kelly Moore Paint Company, Inc 235621 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Kelly Moore Paint Company, Inc Check Total: 235622 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - AS Koefran Industries 235622 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - AS Koefran Industries Check Total: 235623 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Fire -Fleet LEETE GENERATORS 235623 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet LEETE GENERATORS Check Total: 235624 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - FIN MACIAS GINI & O'CONNELL LLP Page 29 of 40 Void Amount 0.36 133.36 0.62 -0.62 -46.68 -0.21 0.21 93.74 264.13 1.22 -1.22 264.13 352.35 352.35 411.11 315.37 2,860.03 304.50 402.37 411.11 2,59053 682.51 7,977.53 10.09 79.57 322.41 412.07 400.00 150.00 550.00 306.76 751.62 1,058.38 26,70852 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount Check Total: 26,708.52 235625 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs-Street Martin Ranch Supply 121.79 235625 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs-Street Martin Ranch Supply 125.05 235625 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs-Street Martin Ranch Supply 125.05 Check Total: 371.89 235626 11/10/2016 General Fund Equipment < $5K - Police METROMOBILE 413.16 Check Total: 413.16 235627 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - Storm Drains Miksis Service Inc 1,760.00 Check Total: 1,760.00 235628 11/10/2016 General Fund Developer Refundable Deposits MOE ENGINEERING, INC. 4,403.75 235628 11/10/2016 General Fund 2297 Revenue - DS MOE ENGINEERING, INC. -4,403.75 235628 11/10/2016 General Fund 2297 Expenses - DS MOE ENGINEERING, INC. 4,403.75 235628 11/10/2016 Successor Agency Housing Fun Contract Svcs - Housing MOE ENGINEERING, INC. 870.00 Check Total: 5,273.75 235629 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp -DS Mr. Sparkle 22.99 235629 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Sewer --Fleet Mr. Sparkle 122.99 235629 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Water-Fleet Mr. Sparkle 56.00 235629 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks-Fleet Mr. Sparkle 26.00 235629 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Rep NonDeptmtl - Fleet Mr. Sparkle 149.50 Check Total: 377.48 235630 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - NonDept MuniServices, LLC 500.00 Check Total: 500.00 235631 11/10/2016 General Fund Office Supplies - Police National Document Solutions, LLC 156.70 235631 11/10/2016 General Fund Office Supplies - DS National Document Solutions, LLC 33.53 235631 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Spec Dept Exp - Water National Document Solutions, LLC 40.14 235631 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms - Police National Document Solutions, LLC 26.10 Check Total: 256.47 235632 11/10/2016 General Fund Advertising - Productions North Bay Bohemian 278.00 Check Total: 278.00 235633 11/10/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Police Occu-Med LTD 540.00 Check Total: 540.00 235634 11/10/2016 General Fund Recruitment - Parks Occupational Health Centers of Califoi 76.00 Page 30 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name 235634 11/10/2016 General Fund 235635 235635 235636 235637 235637 235638 11/10/2016 General Fund 11/10/2016 General Fund 11/10/2016 General Fund 11/10/2016 General Fund 11/10/2016 General Fund 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Account Name Recruitment - SpC Office Supplies - CH Office Supplies - CH Spec Dept Exp - Civil Defense PG&E - Streets PG&E - CH Spec Dept Exp -Sewer 235639 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks 235639 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks 235639 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable 235639 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks 235639 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks 235639 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable 235639 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet 235639 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet 235639 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable 235639 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet 235639 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet 235639 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable 235640 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water 235640 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water 235640 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable 235641 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Uniforms & Laundry Svcs -Sewer 235642 11/10/2016 General Fund EAP Expense - NonDept Page 31 of 40 Vendor Name Void Amount Occupational Health Centers of Califoi 76.00 Check Total: 152.00 Office Depot 589.59 Office Depot 490.18 Check Total: 1,079.77 Office Furniture World, Inc 326.25 Check Total: 326.25 Pacific Gas & Electric 10.19 Pacific Gas & Electric 62.96 Check Total: 73.15 Power Industries 161.88 Check Total: 161.88 Productivity Plus Account 189.11 Productivity Plus Account 0.88 Productivity Plus Account -0.88 Productivity Plus Account 133.58 Productivity Plus Account 0.62 Productivity Plus Account -0.62 Productivity Plus Account 107.17 Productivity Plus Account 0.49 Productivity Plus Account -0.49 Productivity Plus Account 267.68 Productivity Plus Account 1.24 Productivity Plus Account -1.24 Check Total: 697.54 R&B Company 288.32 R&B Company 1.34 R&B Company -1.34 Check Total: 288.32 Red Wing Shoes 65.24 Check Total: 65.24 Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance 552.16 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235645 11/10/2016 Refuse Utility Fund Refuse/Contractal/Professnl Sv Check Total: 552.16 235643 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet Redwood Lock & Key 165.20 235643 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Redwood Lock & Key 46.76 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets Check Total: 211.96 235644 11/10/2016 Recycled Water Utility Fund System Repair - RW Reliable Hardware & Steel Co. 109.97 235644 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - PW Reliable Hardware & Steel Co. 78.30 235644 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - PW Reliable Hardware & Steel Co. 50.24 235644 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Reliable Hardware & Steel Co. 132.54 235644 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Reliable Hardware & Steel Co. 19.14 Check Total: 390.19 235645 11/10/2016 Refuse Utility Fund Refuse/Contractal/Professnl Sv Revolt Recycling LLC 3,760.30 235645 11/10/2016 Refuse Utility Fund Refuse/Contractal/Professnl Sv Revolt Recycling LLC 2,200.19 Check Total: 5,960.49 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 1,709.95 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 107.66 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 107.66 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 541.97 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 533.12 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 217.80 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 272.45 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 561.09 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs - CH CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 445.07 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 148.96 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 221.72 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 38.06 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs-NonDept CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 77.74 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 38.06 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 80.40 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 134.23 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 60.09 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 38.06 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 38.06 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 77.32 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 69.70 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 74.73 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 38.06 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 38.06 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 153.08 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 92.88 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 38.06 Page 32 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 55.08 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 38.06 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs- Streets CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 259.20 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs-B Pool CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 334.25 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs-Parks CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 1,813.86 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs-Parks CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 352.92 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water Costs-Parks CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 2,097.24 235646 11/10/2016 General Fund Water - PW CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 191.96 Check Total: 11,096.61 235647 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Parks Ross Recreation Equipment, Inc. 1,936.75 Check Total: 1,936.75 235648 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Laguna Plant - Sewer City of Santa Rosa 718,098.64 235648 11/10/2016 PFFP Fund SubR Expansion Debt Service City of Santa Rosa 44,719.00 235648 11/10/2016 Recycled Water Utility Fund Purchase of RW City of Santa Rosa 36,554.48 Check Total: 799,372.12 235649 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts -254.48 235649 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Small Tools - Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 108.74 235649 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 57.59 235649 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 169.58 235649 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 30.93 235649 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 154.08 235649 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 86.96 235649 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 13.37 235649 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for DS-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 12.28 235649 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for SrC-Fleet Santa Rosa Auto Parts 19.72 Check Total: 398.77 235650 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms - Police Santa Rosa Uniform & Career Apparel 511.13 235650 11/10/2016 General Fund Uniforms - Fire Santa Rosa Uniform & Career Apparel 160.84 Check Total: 671.97 235651 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Sherwin Williams 111.76 235651 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Sherwin Williams 30.65 235651 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Sherwin Williams 45.32 Check Total: 187.73 235652 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - DS Shums Coda Associates Inc 240.00 Page 33 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name 235653 11/10/2016 General Fund 235654 235654 235654 235655 235655 235655 235656 235656 235657 235658 235659 235659 235659 235660 235660 235660 235661 235661 235661 235662 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 General Fund ISF - Fleet ISF - Fleet General Fund General Fund General Fund Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 223.20 Check Total: 240.00 Recruitment - Police Simpson Investigative Services Group 262.75 PR -70 Comm Ctr Roof Replacment Check Total: 262.75 Spec Dept Exp - Streets Six Robblees' Inc. 335.17 Veli Repairs for Parks -Fleet Six Robblees' Inc. 20.00 Veh Repairs for Parks -Fleet Six Robblees' Inc. 6.74 Check Total: 361.91 Spec Dept Exp - Parks Soiland Co., Inc. 223.20 Spec Dept Exp - Parks Soiland Co., Inc. 0.31 Sales Tax Payable Soiland Co., Inc. -0.31 Page 34 of 40 Check Total: 223.20 Capital Projects Fund PR -76a A Park Restroom Sonoma Media Investments-Advertisir 762.00 Capital Projects Fund PR -70 Comm Ctr Roof Replacment Sonoma Media Investments-Advertisir 802.00 Check Total: 1,564.00 Water Utility Fund Legal Svcs - Water State Water Resources Control Board 17,370.80 Check Total: 17,370.80 General Fund Spec Dept Exp -Police SUN BADGE CO 277.71 Check Total: 277.71 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Sweet Lane Wholesale Nursery 70.36 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - Streets Sweet Lane Wholesale Nursery 0.33 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Sweet Lane Wholesale Nursery -0.33 Check Total: 70.36 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 120.84 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Syar Industries, Inc. 0.56 General Fund Sales Tax Payable Syar Industries, Inc. -0.56 Check Total: 120.84 General Fund Advertising - Non Depmt"l The Community Voice 216.00 Capital Projects Fund University Dist. Specific Plan The Community Voice 192.00 General Fund Advertising - Non Depmt"1 The Community Voice 204.00 Check Total; 612.00 General Fund Contract Svcs - ED The Design Guild 1,350.00 Page 34 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Check Total: 235663 11/10/2016 General Fund Equipmert < $5K - Police Trope Group 235663 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Depi Exp - CH Trope Group Check Total: 235664 11/10/2016 General Fund Janitorial Svcs - SpC Universal Building Services 235664 11/10/2016 General Fund Janitorial Services - ComCtr Universal Building Services 235664 11/10/2016 General Fund Janitorial Services - BARC Universal Building Services 235664 11/10/2016 General Fund Janitorial Svcs - SrC Universal Building Services 235664 11/10/2016 General Fund Janitorial Services - H Pool Universal Building Services 235664 11/10/2016 General Fund Repairs & Maint Routine -PAC Universal Building Services 235664 11/10/2016 General Fund Janitorial Svcs - SpC Universal Building Services Check Total: 235665 11/10/2016 General Fund Developer Refundable Deposits Ward Levy Appraisal Group, Inc. 235665 11/10/2016 General Fund 2297 Revenue - DS Ward Levy Appraisal Group, Inc. 235665 11/10/2016 General Fund 2297 Expenses - DS Ward Levy Appraisal Group, Inc. Check Total: 235666 11/10/2016 General Fund Productions - Production WEAPONS OF CHOICE 235666 11/10/2016 General Fund Productions - Production WEAPONS OF CHOICE 235666 11/10/2016 General Fund Sales Tax Payable WEAPONS OF CHOICE Check Total: 235667 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund SystemRepair - Water Wheeler Zamaroni Check Total: 235668 11/10/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp -DS Your Other Office, Inc. Check Total: 235669 11/10/2016 General Fund Building Stanrds Spec Rev - DS CA BUILDING STANDARDS 235669 11/10/2016 Buildg Standard Sp Rev SB147Bldg Stnds/SB1473 Payable CA BUILDING STANDARDS 235669 11/10/2016 Buildg Standard Sp Rev SB 147Buildng Standards Special Rev CA BUILDING STANDARDS Check Total: 235670 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Veh Repairs for Police -Fleet LEETE GENERATORS Check Total: 235671 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Spec Dept Exp - Fleet MSI Fuel Management, Inc. Page 35 of 40 Void Amount 1,350.00 3,947.24 653.17 4,600.41 1,336.00 919.00 580.00 1,297.00 1,200.00 1,530.00 1,336.00 8,198.00 4,300.00 4.300.00 4,300.00 4,300.00 30.40 0.21 -0.21 30.40 367.03 367.03 264.26 264.26 161.00 547.00 -70.80 637.20 252.75 252.75 208.75 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount Check Total: 208.75 235672 11/10/2016 General Fund Rec Ref Clearing Rubicella Antonia 400.00 Check Total: 400.00 235673 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - SpC AT&T 340.99 235673 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Main Station AT&T 111.37 Check Total: 452.36 235674 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - PW AT&T 37.71 235674 11/10/2016 ISF - Information Technology Telephone - IT AT&T 37.71 235674 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - PS Main Station AT&T 19.79 235674 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - PAC AT&T 19.79 235674 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - SpC AT&T 73.59 235674 11/10/2016 General Fund Telephone - AS Bldg AT&T 37.90 Check Total: 226.49 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - CM AT&T MOBILITY 54.26 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - DS AT&T MOBILITY 184.28 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - HR AT&T MOBILITY 77.88 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - Police AT&T MOBILITY 1,049.88 235675 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Cell Phone - Sewer AT&T MOBILITY 253.12 235675 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Cell Phone - Water AT&T MOBILITY 292.06 235675 11/10/2016 ISF - Information Technology Cell Phone - IT AT&T MOBILITY 131.08 235675 11/10/2016 ISF - Fleet Cell Phone - Fleet AT&T MOBILITY 53.20 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell. Phone - Fire AT&T MOBILITY 307.65 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - AS AT&T MOBILITY 39.68 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - PW AT&T MOBILITY 102.56 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - Streets AT&T MOBILITY 151.92 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - Parks AT&T MOBILITY 180.60 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - SrC AT&T MOBILITY 24.68 235675 11/10/2016 General Fund JEPA Mtn/ Cell Phone AT&T MOBILITY 24.68 Check Total: 2,927.53 235676 11/10/2016 General Fund Training & Travel - Police Michael Bates 818.13 Check Total: 818.13 235677 11/10/2016 General Fund Rec Ref Clearing Chuck Formoso 400.00 Check Total 400.00 235678 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC Gary Zane Friedman 819.00 Page 36 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount Check Total: 819.00 235679 11/10/2016 General Fund Productions - Production MARY JO HAMILTON 339.00 Check Total: 339.00 235680 11/10/2016 General Fund Rec Ref Clearing Valentina Lopez 293.75 Check Total: 293.75 235681 11/10/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets PGE 51.58 235681 11/10/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets PGE 469.44 235681 11/10/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets PGE 28.34 235681 11/10/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets PGE 138.83 235681 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund PG&E - Water PGE 209.65 235681 11/10/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets PGE 13.25 Check Total: 911.09 235682 11/10/2016 General Fund Rec Ref Clearing Kongchay Phommachanh 400.00 Check Total: 400.00 235683 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC Kathleen Robinson 62.40 235683 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC Kathleen Robinson 8.00 235683 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC Kathleen Robinson 156.00 Check Total: 226.40 235684 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - Gold Ridge Lajwan Renee Robinson 617.50 235684 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - Gold Ridge Lajwan Renee Robinson 72.00 Check Total: 689.50 235685 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - RPCC Skyhawks Sports Academy 867.75 Check Total: 867.75 235686 11/10/2016 General Fund Training & Travel - Fire Sonoma Fire Training Officers Assoc. 300.00 Check Total: 300.00 235687 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - SpC PAMELA STAFFORD 94.25 Check Total. 94.25 235688 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - SpC Sue Stubblebine 107.25 Check Total_ 107.25 235689 11/10/2016 ISF - Information Technology Telephone - IT Verizon Wireless 144.30 235689 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - CH Verizon Wireless 38.01 Page 37 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount 235689 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - PW Verizon Wireless 10.02 235689 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - DS Verizon Wireless 38.01 235689 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - DS Verizon Wireless 68.07 235689 11/10/2016 General Fund Cell Phone - Police Verizon Wireless 20.04 235689 11/10/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Cell Phone - Sewer Verizon Wireless 20.02 235689 11/10/2016 Water Utility Fund Cell Phone - Water Verizon Wireless 40.04 235689 11/10/2016 ISF - Information Technology Cell Phone - IT Verizon Wireless 76.02 Check Total: 454.53 235690 11/10/2016 General Fund Building Permit Fees Vivint Solar 165.00 235690 11/10/2016 General Fund Building Standards Special Rev Vivint Solar 1.00 235690 11/10/2016 General Fund Building Permit Fees Vivint Solar 165.00 235690 11/10/2016 General Fund Building Standards Special Rev Vivint Solar 1.00 235690 11/10/2016 General Fund Building Permit Fees Vivint Solar 165.00 235690 11/10/2016 General Fund Building Standards Special Rev Vivint Solar 1.00 Check Total: 498.00 235691 11/10/2016 General Fund Production - Summer Programs David Yen 1,500.00 Check Total: 1,500.00 235692 11/10/2016 General Fund Contract Svcs - SpC Kathleen Zincavage 93.60 Check Total: 93.60 235693 11/14/2016 General Fund John Anglin 629.40 Check Total: 629.40 235694 11/14/2016 General Fund Telephone - B Pool AT&T 65.89 Check Total: 65.89 235695 11/14/2016 General Fund Telephone - SpC Comcast 19.54 235695 11/14/2016 General Fund Telephone - SrC Comcast 55.82 Check Total: 75.36 235696 11/14/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Training & Travel - PW SWR CITY OF COTATI 600.00 Check Total: 600.00 235697 11/14/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - SrC Fishman Supply Company 60.73 235697 11/14/2016 General Fund Spec Dept Exp - SrC Fishman Supply Company 34.23 Check Total: 94.96 235698 11/14/2016 General Fund JAMES HEROLD 226.00 Page 38 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount Check Total: 226.00 235699 11/14/2016 General Fund Arthur Hollingsworth 1,242.66 Check Total: 1,242.66 235700 11/14/2016 General Fund Diane Holmes 74.57 Check Total: 74.57 235701 11/14/2016 General Fund Warren K. Hopkins 2,004.92 Check Total: 2,004.92 235702 11/14/2016 General Fund POST Training & Travel -Police NAPA VALLEY COLLEGE 182.00 Check Total: 182.00 235703 11/14/2016 General Fund JOSEPH D. NETTER 925.40 Check Total: 925.40 235704 11/14/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets Pacific Gas & Electric 51.58 235704 11/14/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets Pacific Gas & Electric 10.19 235704 11/14/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets Pacific Gas & Electric 103.98 235704 11/14/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets Pacific Gas & Electric 469.44 235704 11/14/2016 General Fund PG&E - PS Main Station Pacific Gas & Electric 71.89 235704 11/14/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets Pacific Gas & Electric 61.17 235704 11/14/2016 General Fund PG&E - CH Pacific Gas & Electric 1,049.88 235704 11/14/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets Pacific Gas & Electric 28.34 235704 11/14/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets Pacific Gas & Electric 138.83 235704 11/14/2016 Water Utility Fund PG&E - Water Pacific Gas & Electric 209.65 235704 11/14/2016 General Fund PG&E - Streets Pacific Gas & Electric 13.25 Check Total: 2,208.20 235705 11/14/2016 General Fund Del Patton 559.17 Check Total: 559.17 235706 11/14/2016 Sewer Utility Fund Laguna Plant - Sewer City of Santa Rosa 507,865.75 235706 11/14/2016 PFFP Fund SubR Expansion Debt Service City of Santa Rosa 254,951.89 Check Total: 762,817.64 235707 11/14/2016 SECA - State Seized Assets State Seizure Pending -Payable Sonoma County Office of the District , 208,800.00 235707 11/14/2016 SECA - State Seized Assets Interest Inc State Seized Asse Sonoma County Office of the District, 1,086.94 Page 39 of 40 Check Number Check Date Fund Name Account Name Vendor Name Void Amount Check Total: 209,886.94 235708 11/14/2016 General Fund Walter Taddeucci 672.22 Check Total 235709 11/14/2016 General Fund John Thompson Check Total: 235710 11/14/2016 General Fund Robert H. Williams Check Total- Report Total: AP -Checks for Approval (11/15/2016 - 3:25 PM) Page 40 of 40 672.22 378.40 378.40 418.13 418.13 2,621,778.29 SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK BILLS FOR ACCEPTANCE November 22, 2016 Check Numbers: 235582 $237.12 Dated: November 1, 2016 - November 14, 2016 TOTAL $237.12 to C. N M El., N G a� 0 CIO U C) U 0 r z i m m m IL ,�'pHNERT P.4Rx �r g 62 CA LIFp RNSP Meeting Date: Department: Submitted By: Prepared By: Agenda Title: ITEM NO. 6C1 Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 22, 2016 Administration Don Schwartz, Assistant City Manager Don Schwartz, Assistant City Manager Extension of Temporary Debris Box Franchise Agreements with Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Approve the extension of Temporary Debris Box Franchise Agreements with Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting for a period of six (6) months; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute and deliver Notices of Intent to Extend on behalf of the City of Rohnert Park for extension of said agreements to Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting. BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: At the November 22, 2011 City Council Meeting, the Council adopted Resolution 2011-113 approving the award of exclusive multiple provider franchise agreements for temporary debris box and roll -off collection services to Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting respectively. The term of the agreements was for a four (4) year and six (6) month period which expired on June 30, 2016. On June 14, 2016 the City Council approved six month extensions to these agreements, with expiration on December 31, 2016. Staff wishes to further extend the temporary debris box and roll -off collection services franchise agreements with Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting for a period of six (6) months or until such time that the agreements are superseded by formal action of the City Council. Staff has been conducting a Request for Proposals process for new agreements. During that process, we learned of some ambiguities among the City's solid waste agreements. In particular, the City's Waste Delivery Agreement with Republic Services (operator of the Central landfill) explicitly excludes waste from debris boxes from the requirement that the City direct its waste to the Central landfill. However, Republic Services suggests that, even though debris box waste is exempted from that requirement, `residual' waste from debris boxes — that waste which cannot be recycled — is required to be delivered to the Central landfill. In addition, Republic charges lower rates to one debris box provider (Rohnert Park Disposal) that are not available to other providers, thereby creating the ITEM NO. 6C1 potential for a competitive advantage for Rohnert Park Disposal should the `residual' debris waste be delivered to the Central landfill. The extension will provide staff with additional time to resolve these issues. R3 Consulting Group will continue to assist in this effort, including updating key terms of the Agreement regarding payment, enforcement, reporting, etc.to help the City attain its diversion goals, maintain reasonable rates and provide for adequate performance, enforcement and reporting mechanisms. Staff recommends the City Council approve an additional six-month extension of the temporary debris box franchise agreements with Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting and further recommends authorizing the City Manager to execute and deliver on behalf of the City, a notice of intent to extend the agreements to both parties. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: No additional options were considered; if approved, the contract extensions will allow staff additional time to pursue the RFP/Q process for these agreements. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: By approving the proposed agreement extensions, the City Council would be furthering Goal C of the City's Strategic Plan by ensuring the effective delivery of public services. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: There is no fiscal impact. The terms of both contracts remain in full force and effect until Council considers the adoption of new contracts for this service at a future City Council meeting. Finance Dept. Approval Date: N/A City Manager Approval Date: November 9, 2016 City Attorney Approval Date: November 7, 2016 Attachments: 1. Approving Resolution 2. Second Amendments to the Temporary Debris Box Franchise (Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting) 3. Letters re Notice of Intent to Extend Agreements (Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. & Industrial Carting) 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING A SIX-MONTH EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY DEBRIS BOX AND ROLL- OFF COLLECTION SERVICES FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS WITH ROHNERT PARK DISPOSAL, INC. AND INDUSTRIAL CARTING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SEND NOTICES OF INTENT TO EXTEND AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, on November 22, 2011 the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park ("City") adopted Resolution No. 2011-113, awarding a Multiple Provider Exclusive Temporary Debris Box and Roll -off Collection Service Agreement ("Agreement") to Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting; and WHEREAS, the term of the Agreements commenced on January 1, 2012 and continues in full force and effect ; and WHEREAS, the Agreements may be extended in up to twelve (12) month increments for a maximum of four (4) years until June 30, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City extended the Agreement for six (6) months until December 31, 2016 and desires to create a further extension for an additional six months until June 30, 2017, and Franchisees are willing to extend for this period of time; and WHEREAS, the additional extension will allow City staff sufficient time to: (a) complete a previously commenced Request for Proposal/Qualification process with interested debris box and roll -off collection service providers, (b) work with a consultant to assist staff in updating key terms of the Agreement regarding payment, enforcement, reporting, etc., and (c) return to the City Council to consider awarding franchise agreement(s) to service provider(s) on the updated terms. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park hereby approves an Amendment to the Agreements with Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting, respectively, in substantially similar form to the Amendment attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, subject to minor modification by the City Manager or City Attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the City of Rohnert Park, Notices of Intent to Extend said Agreement to Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting and take other actions as may be necessary and appropriate to effectuate the Amendment. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park this 22nd day of November, 2016. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Gina Belforte, Mayor ATTEST: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk Attachments: Second Amendment to Agreements with Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting AHANOTU: CALLINAN: STAFFORD: MACKENZIE: BELFORTE: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT:( ) ABSTAIN: ( SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE MULTIPLE PROVIDER EXCLUSIVE TEMPORARY DEBRIS BOX AND ROLL -OFF COLLECTION SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AND ROHNERT PARK DISPOSAL, INC. This First Amendment to the Multiple Provider Exclusive Temporary Debris Box and Roll -off Collection Service Agreement ("First Amendment") between the City of Rohnert Park ("City") and Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. ("Franchisee") is made this day of 2016 with reference to the following facts and intentions: RECITALS WHEREAS, on November 22, 2011 the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park ("City") adopted Resolution No. 2011-113, awarding a Multiple Provider Exclusive Temporary Debris Box and Roll -off Collection Service Agreement ("Agreements") to Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting; and WHEREAS, on June 14, 2016 the City Council approved six month extensions to these agreements, with expiration on December 31, 2016; and WHEREAS, the term of the City's Agreement with Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. commenced on January 1, 2012 and continues in full force and effect until December 31, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Agreement may be extended in up to twelve (12) month increments for a maximum of four (4) years until June 30, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to extend the Agreement for six (6) months and Franchisee is willing to extend for this period of time; and WHEREAS, the extension will allow City staff sufficient time to: (a) complete a previously commenced Request for Proposal/Qualification process with interested debris box and roll -off collection service providers, (b) work with a consultant to assist staff in updating key terms of the Agreements regarding payment, enforcement, reporting, etc., and (c) return to the City Council to consider awarding franchise agreement(s) to service provider(s) on the updated terms. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions and covenants herein contained, the parties do hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Temporary Extension. Section 2.01 (Term) of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term for an additional six (6) months, terminating on June 30, 2017. 2. Relationship to Agreement. Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3. Authority and Non -Assignment. City and Franchisee represent to the other that they have authority to enter into this First Amendment. Any corporate signatory represents and warrants that it has all requisite corporate power and corporate authority to enter into and perform this Agreement. 4. Counterpart Signatures. This First Amendment may be signed in multiple counterparts which, when signed by all parties, shall constitute a binding agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed on the date first written by their respective officers duly authorized on their behalf. "CITY" City of Rohnert Park By: Darrin Jenkins, City Manager Per Resolution No. APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney ATTEST: By: City Clerk OA "FRANCHISEE" Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. By: (Name) Its. SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE MULTIPLE PROVIDER EXCLUSIVE TEMPORARY DEBRIS BOX AND ROLL -OFF COLLECTION SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AND INDUSTRIAL CARTING This First Amendment to the Multiple Provider Exclusive Temporary Debris Box and Roll -off Collection Service Agreement ("First Amendment") between the City of Rohnert Park ("City") and Industrial Carting ("Franchisee") is made this day of 12016 with reference to the following facts and intentions: RECITALS WHEREAS, on November 22, 2011 the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park ("City") adopted Resolution No. 2011-113, awarding a Multiple Provider Exclusive Temporary Debris Box and Roll -off Collection Service Agreements ("Agreement") to Rohnert Park Disposal, Inc. and Industrial Carting; and WHEREAS, on June 14, 2016 the City Council approved six month extensions to these agreements, with expiration on December 31, 2016; and WHEREAS, the term of the City's Agreement with Industrial Carting commenced on January 1, 2012 and continues in full force and effect until December 31, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Agreement may be extended in up to twelve (12) month increments for a maximum of four (4) years until June 30, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to extend the Agreement for six (6) months and Franchisee is willing to extend for this period of time; and WHEREAS, the extension will allow City staff sufficient time to: (a) complete a previously commenced Request for Proposal/Qualification process with interested debris box and roll -off collection service providers, (b) work with a consultant to assist staff in updating key terms of the Agreement regarding payment, enforcement, reporting, etc., and (c) return to the City Council to consider awarding franchise agreement(s) to service provider(s) on the updated terms. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions and covenants herein contained, the parties do hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Temporary Extension. Section 2.01 (Term) of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term for an additional six (6) months, terminating on June 30, 2017. 2. Relationship to Agreement. Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3. Authority and Non-Assitnment. City and Franchisee represent to the other that they have authority to enter into this First Amendment. Any corporate signatory represents and warrants that it has all requisite corporate power and corporate authority to enter into and perform this Agreement. 4. Counterpart Signatures. This First Amendment may be signed in multiple counterparts which, when signed by all parties, shall constitute a binding agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed on the date first written by their respective officers duly authorized on their behalf. "CITY" City of Rohnert Park By: Darrin Jenkins, City Manager Per Resolution No. APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney ATTEST: By: City Clerk "FRANCHISEE" Industrial Carting By: (Name) Its. City Council Gina Belforte Mayor November , 2016 Rick Powell, General Manager Rohnert Park Disposal P.O. Box 1916 Santa Rosa, CA 95402 Jake Mackenzie Re: Notice of Intent to Extend the Temporary Debris Box Agreement Vice Mayor ("Agreement") between the City of Rohnert Park and Rohnert Park Disposal for the provision of Temporary Debris Box Services within the City of Rohnert Amy 0. Ahanotu Park Joseph T. Callinan In accordance with the Agreement Article 2 — Term of Agreement and Article Pam Stafford 17 — Modifications to the Agreement, the City of Rohnert Park does hereby Councilmembers Dear Mr. Powell: Darrin Jenkins On November 22, 2016, the Rohnert Park City Council authorized the City City Manager Manager to execute and deliver on behalf of the City of Rohnert Park, a Notice of Intent to Extend the Agreement with Rohnert Park Disposal. Don Schwartz Darrin Jenkins Assistant City Manager In accordance with the Agreement Article 2 — Term of Agreement and Article Michelle Marchetta Kenyon 17 — Modifications to the Agreement, the City of Rohnert Park does hereby City Attorney extend the Term of the franchise agreement with Rohnert Park Disposal for a Alexandra M. Barnhill period of six (6) months. The amended term shall extend the current Assistant City Attorney agreement from December 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017. All remaining terms accepted by the undersigned on and conditions contained within the Agreement shall remain in full force and JoAnne Clerk er City Clerk throughout effect thhout the extended term. Betsy Howze Sincerely, Finance Director Rohnert Park Disposal Brian Masterson Director of Public Safety John McArthur Darrin Jenkins Director of Public Works and City Manager Community Services Mary Grace Pawson The terms and conditions of the forgoing Notice of Intent to Extend are hereby Director of accepted by the undersigned on 2016. Development Services Victoria Perrault Rohnert Park Disposal Human Resources Director By: Title: 130 Avram Avenue ♦ Rohnert Park CA ♦ 94928 ♦ (707) 588-2226 ♦ Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpcity.org City Council Gina Belforte Mayor November 2016 Curtis Michelini, Sr., President Industrial Carting P.O. Box 2638 Rohnert Park, CA 94927 Jake Mackenzie Re: Notice of Intent to Extend the Temporary Debris Box Agreement Vice Mayor ("Agreement") between the City of Rohnert Park and Industrial Carting for the Michelle Marchetta Kenyon provision of Temporary Debris Box Services within the City of Rohnert Park Amy 0. Ahanotu period of six (6) months. The amended term shall extend the current Joseph T. Callinan Pam Stafford Dear Mr. Michelini: Councilmembers and conditions contained within the Agreement shall remain in full force and Community Services On November 22, 2016, the Rohnert Park City Council authorized the City JoAnne Buergler Manager to execute and deliver on behalf of the City of Rohnert Park, a Darrin Jenkins City Manager Notice of Intent to Extend the Agreement with Industrial Carting. Don Schwartz In accordance with the Agreement Article 2 — Term of Agreement and Article Assistant City Manager 17 — Modifications to the Agreement, the City of Rohnert Park does hereby Michelle Marchetta Kenyon extend the Term of the franchise agreement with Industrial Carting for a City Attorney period of six (6) months. The amended term shall extend the current Alexandra M. Barnhill agreement from December 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017. All remaining terms Assistant City Attorney and conditions contained within the Agreement shall remain in full force and Community Services effect throughout the extended term. JoAnne Buergler accepted by the undersigned on City Clerk Director of Sincerely, Betsy Howze Finance Director Victoria Perrault Brian Masterson Director of Public Safety Darrin Jenkins John McArthur City Manager Director of Public Works and Community Services The terms and conditions of the forgoing Notice of Intent to Extend are hereby Mary Grace Pawson accepted by the undersigned on 12016. Director of Development Services Industrial Carting Victoria Perrault Human Resources Director By: Title: 130 Avram Avenue ♦ Rohnert Park CA ♦ 94928 ♦ (707) 588-2226 ♦ Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpcity.org �LpyiNERT pARg ITEM NO. 6C2 .� Mission Statement � sz "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." �AtlF6 AK''P CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November 22, 2016 Department: Administration and Development Services Submitted By: Don Schwartz, Assistant City Manager and Mary Grace Pawson, Development Services Director Prepared By: Don Schwartz, Assistant City Manager Agenda Title: Adoption of Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park Approving a Third Amendment to the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of 5870 Labath Avenue (Stadium Lands) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt resolution approving a Third Amendment to the Agreement for Purchase and Sale (PSA) for the City's Stadium Lands property at 5870 Labath Avenue. BACKGROUND: In August, 2015 the City entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell approximately 12.25 acres of City -owned property at 5870 Labath Avenue, known as the Stadium Lands property. The City Council approved two amendments to the initial agreement in November, 2015. The first amendment extended the initial due diligence period for 30 days, and the second allowed the buyer to construct up to 135 apartments on the property. Staff is recommending that the City Council approve a Third Amendment to the Purchase and Sales Agreement. The proposed Amendment includes: a. Removing the City's right to repurchase the property should the buyer not commence construction of a hotel on the site within three years of the PSA effective date, or abandons construction of a hotel (Section 7.3). b. Removes the requirement for the buyer to obtain a building permit prior to close of escrow, instead requiring the buyer to obtain a grading permit, and adding the requirement for the buyer to obtain a construction deed of trust documenting that buyer has funds required to begin construction (Section 2.2f). Adding approximately 0.1 acres to the amount of property purchased without increasing the purchase price (Recital A and Section 1.3). d. Amending the Development Agreement Term Sheet to add the requirement for buyer to construct the Martin Avenue improvements, with City to fund the portion on its retained property (Exhibit B). ITEM NO. 6C2 ANALYSIS: The first two changes are necessary for the buyer to obtain financing for the hotel and residential components of the project. While this reduces protection of the City interests, the developer has substantial incentives to build a hotel without these requirements and has agreed to provide a construction deed of trust prior to close of escrow. The third change reflects the fact that the City no longer needs to retain the 0.1 acre in question for our uses for future City facilities; retaining that acreage could increase the City's costs for improvements. The fourth change reflects the agreement reached between the parties with respect to the construction of the Martin Avenue improvements. ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommended action is consistent with the Strategic Plan goal of achieving financial stability. The proposed Third Amendment to the Purchase and Sale agreement is necessary to allow the construction of the hotel, which will bring additional visitors and tax revenue to the City. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: 1. Recommended Option: Staff recommends approving the Third Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement because it will allow the sale of the property and associated project to proceed without substantially increasing risk to the City. Reducing the City - owned land by 0.1 acre will reduce the City's costs for improving the property. 2. Alternative: Staff also considered retaining the buyer's requirements and did not recommend this option because it would have made construction of the hotel and residential units infeasible. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: Staff estimate that the City's net revenue from sale of the Stadium Lands property will be approximately $6 million, and on-going revenue from the hotel and residential development will be $800,000/year. Department Head Approval Date: N/A Finance Director Approval Date: N/A City Attorney Approval Date: November 10, 2016 City Manager Approval Date: November 17, 2016 Attachments (list in packet assembly order): 1. Resolution approving Third Amendment to Stadium Lands Purchase and Sale Agreement 2. Proposed Third Amendment to Stadium Lands Purchase and Sale Agreement 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING A THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE BETWEEN THE CITY AND STADIUM RP DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, REGARDING THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS STADIUM LANDS WHEREAS, on August 11, 2015, the City and 356 Advisors, Inc. and MJW Investments, LLC (the "Initial Buyer Party"), entered into that certain Agreement for Purchase and Sale (Including Joint Escrow Instructions) and Terms of Development (the "Original Agreement") with respect to Buyer's purchase and development of that certain real property consisting of 12.25 acres and located at Labath Avenue and Carlson Avenue in the City of Rohnert Park (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2015, City and the Initial Buyer Parry entered into a First Amendment to the Original Agreement to extend the due diligence period an additional 30 days to allow the buyer time for further analysis; and WHEREAS, on November 24, 2015, City and the Initial Buyer Party entered into a Second Amendment to the Original Agreement, as amended, to set forth the terms and conditions of a modified project that allows for residential development, including a revised Development Agreement Term Sheet; and WHEREAS, the Initial Buyer Party subsequently assigned its interests in the Original Agreement, as amended, to MJW Investments, Inc., who subsequently assigned its interests in the Agreement to Stadium RP Development Partners, LLC (the "Buyer"); and WHEREAS, Buyer and City now desire to amend the Agreement a third time to: (1) remove the City's right to repurchase the Property; (2) amend the description of the Property to add an additional 0.1 acres; (3) amend Buyer's condition to close to require a grading permit, rather than a building permit, and a construction deed of trust; and (4) amend the Development Agreement Term Sheet to set forth the terms by which the Buyer will construct the Martin Avenue improvements; and WHEREAS, Buyer and City staff have negotiated the form of a Third Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Including Joint Escrow Instructions) and Terms of Development, attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Third Amendment"). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it does hereby find, determine, declare and resolve as follows: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. Section 2. Approval of the Third Amendment. The form of Third Amendment included as Exhibit A to this Resolution is approved subject to minor modifications approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 1 Section 3. Authority to Execute. The Mayor or her designee is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Third Amendment, in substantially similar form to that attached as Exhibit A Section 4. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 22nd day of November, 2016. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Gina Belforte, Mayor ATTEST: JoAnne M. Buergler, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A AHANOTU: CALLINAN: STAFFORD: MACKENZIE: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT:( ) ABSTAIN: (2) 2016-111 BELFORTE: THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE (INCLUDING JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS) AND TERMS OF DEVELOPMENT This Third Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale (Including Joint Escrow Instructions) and Terms of Development ("Third Amendment"), dated as of 2016 ("Effective Date"), is by and between the CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, a California municipal corporation ("Seller" or "City"), and STADIUM RP DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, a California limited liability company (the "Buyer"). RECITALS A. On August 11, 2015, Seller and Buyer's predecessor -in -interest, 356 Advisors, Inc. and MJW Investments, LLC (the "Initial Buyer Party"), entered into that certain Agreement for Purchase and Sale (Including Joint Escrow Instructions) and Terms of Development (the "Original Agreement") with respect to Buyer's purchase and development of that certain real property consisting of 12.25 acres and located at Labath Avenue and Carlson Avenue in the City of Rohnert Park (the "Property"). Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement, as defined in Recital C. below. B. On November 2, 2015, City and the Initial Buyer Parry entered into a First Amendment to the Original Agreement to extend the Due Diligence Period an additional 30 days to allow Buyer time for further analysis (the "First Amendment"). C. On November 24, 2015, City and the Initial Buyer Party entered into a Second Amendment to the Original Agreement, as amended, to set forth the terms and conditions of a modified project that allows for residential development, including a revised Development Agreement Term Sheet (the "Second Amendment"). The Original Agreement, as modified by the First and Second Amendments, may be referred to herein as the "Agreement." D. The Initial Buyer Party subsequently assigned its interests in the Agreement to MJW Investments, Inc., who subsequently assigned its interests in the Agreement to Buyer. E. Buyer and City now desire to amend the Agreement a third time to: (1) remove the City's right to repurchase the Property; (2) amend the description of the Property to add an additional 0.1 acres; (3) amend Buyer's conditions to close to require a grading permit, rather than a building permit, and a construction deed of trust; and (4) amend the Development Agreement Term Sheet to set forth the terms by which the Buyer will construct the Martin Avenue improvements. F. The City Council of the City of Rohnert Park duly authorized the execution of this Third Amendment by resolution adopted on 52016. OAK #4843-8194-5898 Q AGREEMENT Recital A is amended to delete the reference to 12.25 acres and replace it with 12.35 acres. 2. Section 2.2(f) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: "(f) Buyer shall be prepared to obtain a grading permit and to construct the Hotel immediately upon close of escrow, as demonstrated by an agreement between Buyer and a hotel operator or franchise, a construction contract between Buyer and a contractor ready to begin construction of the Hotel, and a construction deed of trust documenting the loan to Buyer of funds necessary to begin construction." 3. The last sentence of Section 4. 1, regarding Seller's right to repurchase, is hereby deleted in its entirety. 4. The first sentence of Section 7.1 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: "The failure by any party to perform any obligation under this Agreement or the Development Agreement, if the failure has continued for a period of thirty (30) days after the other party demands in writing that the defaulting party cure the failure, shall be deemed a default hereunder." 5. Section 7.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety. 6. Exhibit A, Legal Description of the Property, is deleted in its entirety and replaced with Exhibit A-1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 7. Exhibit B, Development Agreement Term Sheet, is deleted in its entirety and replaced with Exhibit B-2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 8. Exhibit C, Grant Deed, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Exhibit C-1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 9. Except as hereby amended by this Third Amendment, the Agreement, as amended by the First and Second Amendments, remains in full force and effect. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] OAK #4843-8194-5898 Q IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment as of the Effective Date. SELLER: City of Rohnert Park Dated: , 2016 By: Gina Belforte, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney BUYER: STADIUM RP DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, a California limited liability corporation Dated: , 2016 By: Name: Its: Matthew J. Waken Manager OAK #4843-8194-5898 Q 3 EXHIBIT A-1 EXHIBIT A BUSINEW PARK DR i i LSON AVE. CARAVE S89'43'10'W 344.65' "'�R=32.04' I - cy� 139'13'10" _ L=21.90' o, l S89"43'10"W C61 'F N45'08'25'W o arm- ROHNERT PARK wAr 177.14' 48.14' =. 16.22' R16900' W I S44'41'09"W A-39113110" =D 1 24.44' L-115.68' 1 L >CATION MAP 1 -C I Q W "> NO SCALE _ 1 S or co THE CITY OF OPMERT PARK w 1� APN 143-040-124 p 1 DOG NO. 2001-173231 1 Q R=234.00' A=18'45'00"� I 1 1 L=76.58'uj 518"45'00'E Q +� 65.29' I m 1 o R--25 DO g i R-270.00' A-94'34'01" trO7'40'L14" R=808.00' 41.26' L=36.15' LF03'23'01" L=47,72S14'10'S9'E 168.00' P1;L f 58344 49'W - -0 20'0}' 44'1 242.fi9 R=$34.00' 1}^_ _ - L=291.54' R=7'92.00` t--15'40'31' SOO"07'14'E L=216.$8' 26.15' APN 14J-040-120 CITY PARCEL APN 14J-040-124 HIAEBAUGH CREEK 0 200 500 E3AJEM CNF E EAFUNCI$ BEING SOUTH 89'34'00" EAST BETWEEN FOUND 3" BRASS BGALE=" - 20Q' DISKS IN MONUMENT WELLS ALONG BUSINESS PARK DRIVE MARKING THE EASTERLY END OF A 250' RADIUS CURVE AND THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION WITH REDWOOD DRIVE THIS EXHIBIT IS FOR GRAPHIC AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ENTITLED ROHNERT BUSINESS PURPOSES ONLY. ANY ERRORS OR PARK SUBDIVISION, FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 375 OF OMISSIONS SHALL NOT AFFECT THE MAPS. PAGES 10 AND 11 SONOMA COUNTY RECORDS. DEED DESCRIPTION.. owNER AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION CITY OF ROHNERT PARK MAILING ADDRESS CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 6750 COMMERCE BLVD. 12.32 ACRES TO ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 707 5882234 MJW INVESTMENTS, LLC A.P. No. 143-040-124 PROPERTY ACQUISITION DEED SCALE: 1"-200' DATE: 11-15-16 DYM, zap CKr, AS APPROVED FILE N0. R. - DOC. NO. 2001-173231 DOC. NO. OAK #4843-8194-5898 v2 Exhibit A- I EXHIBIT B-2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TERM SHEET Development Agreement ("DA") between the City of Rohnert Park ("City") and 356 Advisors, Inc. and MJW Investments, LLC (together the "Buyer") concerning the development of certain real property consisting of 12.25 acres and located at Labath Avenue and Carlson Avenue in the City of Rohnert Park ("Property"). 1. Purpose of Agreement. The purpose of the DA is to set forth (a) Buyer's vested rights to develop and construct (i) an up to 300 -room select service and/or suite hotel(s); and (ii) a separate retail, commercial, residential (up to 135 apartments or such lower amount as can be adequately parked and meet any other established City requirements in existence at the time of this Amendment), or office component in addition to the hotel (collectively, the "Project") in accordance with the general plan, land use designation and zoning in place as of the date of the Agreement, (b) Buyer's obligations to phase the Project to ensure the hotel is constructed prior to or simultaneously with retail/commercial development, and (c) Buyer's obligation to construct and/or fund certain required public improvements. 2. Term. The term would be five years commencing on the effective date of the DA, with one possible two-year extension, which may be approved in City's reasonable discretion if Buyer has made progress toward constructing the Project. 3. Development. The Project would be developed in accordance with the general plan designation and zoning currently in place and the following approvals to be obtained by the Buyer concurrently with approval of the DA: (a) Conditional Use Permit; (b) Site Plan and Architectural Review; and (c) a Tentative Subdivision Map, as described in Section 4 below (the "Project Approvals"). The permitted uses, density and intensity of development and maximum height and size of proposed buildings shall all be in accordance with the Project Approvals, including any mutually agreed upon amendments. 4. Tentative Subdivision Map. Buyer would submit an application and undertake necessary actions to seek the approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map splitting the Property into 5 lots, including (a) the southern 2.9 -acre portion to be retained by City; (b) the portion to be used for the park as described in Section 8(d) of this Exhibit; (c) the portion on which the hotel will be developed; (d) the portion on which the retail component will be developed; and (e) the portion on which the residential portion will be developed. 5. Phasing. Buyer would agree to certain milestones for development as follows: (a) Buyer would obtain a building permit to construct the hotel prior to, or in concurrence with, issuance of a building permit for any other development on the Property, including any residential development. (b) Buyer would commence construction of the hotel prior to, or in concurrence with, commencement of construction of any other development on the property, but no later than three years from the Effective Date of the Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Buyer's purchase of OAK #4843-8194-5898 Q Exhibit B-2-1 the Property, subject to force majeure as defined in Section 8.20 of the Purchase and Sale Agreement. (c) Buyer would complete construction of the hotel and obtain a certificate of occupancy within 18 months of commencement of construction, subject to force majeure as defined in Section 8.20 of the Purchase and Sale Agreement. 6. CEQA. Buyer will comply with all mitigation measures in the Stadium Area Master Plan EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP). Buyer shall comply with all additional mitigation measures imposed as a result of the Project -level CEQA process. 7. Vested Rights. City would grant Buyer the vested right to develop and construct the Project, in accordance with the City general plan and zoning in place as of the effective date and the Project Approvals, except for: (a) New City laws and regulations regarding procedural matters, such as hearing bodies, appeals and applications, provided such laws and regulations are uniformly applied on a city-wide basis to all substantially similar types of development projects and properties; (b) New City laws and regulations that revise the City's uniform construction codes, and that are in effect at the time of permitting, provided such laws and regulations are uniformly applied on a city-wide basis to all substantially similar types of development projects and properties; (c) New City laws and regulations that are necessary to protect physical health and safety of the public or do not conflict with the DA or Project Approvals, provided such laws and regulations are uniformly applied on a city-wide basis to all substantially similar types of development projects and properties; and (d) Changes to the law mandated by State or Federal Law, as provided in Government Code section 65869.5. 8. Benefits to Ci (a) Buyer would agree to construct to City standards and specifications and/or dedicate the following improvements for public use within the noted time -frames: (i) Final 1/3 of Carlson Avenue improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and 16 -foot wide of travelway to provide an ultimate curb -to -curb width of 48 feet, prior to occupancy of first development project; (ii) Sidewalk along Dowdell Avenue frontage, prior to occupancy of first development project; (iii) Labath Avenue northbound right -turn lane at Martin Avenue widening and improvements (or as determined by a traffic study), prior to occupancy of first development project; OAK #4843-8194-5898 Q Exhibit B-2-2 (iv) Storm drain outfall into Hinebaugh Creek (design, permitting, and construction), as shown on the Stadium Lands approved tentative map, prior to occupancy of first development project; (v) 12 -inch water main in Redwood Drive between Hinebaugh Creek PRV vault to Martin Avenue, prior to occupancy of first development project; and (vi) Site irrigation connected to existing recycled water system within Labath Avenue and/or Dowdell Avenue at a date to be determined. (b) Buyer would agree to construct to City standards and specifications the Martin Avenue improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk to provide an ultimate curb -to -curb width of 42 to 55 feet, as illustrated in Attachment 1, prior to occupancy of the first development project, with City to fund the half -width of the improvements adjacent to the property to be retained by City, as illustrated in Attachment 1. (c) Buyer would contribute its proportionate share, based on anticipated water usage by the Project, estimated cost of $110,000, toward a water storage tank located on the west side of the City prior to issuance of first building permit. (d) Buyer would enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement to address long- term maintenance of on-site storm drainage and water quality features within the City. (e) Buyer would design, construct and dedicate to City a public park of at least 0.65 acres in a location on the Property, as approved by the City. The total cost of the parkland and improvements shall equal $788,000, with the land valued at $583,673 per acre, as verified by the City with supporting documentation by Buyer. In the event that the Buyer's total costs are lower than $788,000, the difference between $788,000 and the actual costs would be paid by Buyer to City prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project. (f) Buyer would pay an annual assessment of $800 per residential unit constructed on the Property, to be adjusted annually in accordance with the Consumer Price Index, to the City with such obligation to be documented in an instrument recorded against the Property. Buyer may consider an alternative financing mechanism to fund the annual assessments and City will work in good faith with Buyer to establish such a mechanism, if legally supportable, subject to City approval. The recorded instrument or financing mechanism shall be in place or established prior to the issuance of the first building permit. (g) Buyer would contribute $50,000 toward the creation of affordable housing in the City, with such payment due prior to the issuance of the first building permit. 9. Fees, Taxes, Reimbursements and Assessments. (a) Impact Fees. Buyer would pay impact fees in place at the time the Development Agreement is executed, at the rate then in effect as shall be increased based upon the Construction Cost Index from the Engineering News Report. OAK #4843-8194-5898 Q Exhibit B-2-3 (b) Taxes and Assessments. City could impose and Buyer would pay any new, increased or modified taxes or assessments, provided such taxes or assessments are equally applied on a city-wide basis and have a uniform effect on a broadly-based class of land, projects or taxpayers, as applicable, within the City. (c) Processing and Consultant Fees. Buyer would pay all reasonable processing fees imposed by the City to cover the actual costs to City of processing applications for the Project Approvals, as such fees are uniformly applied, at the rate in effect at the time of application. Buyer would also pay all reasonable, out-of-pocket costs of City of engaging third -parties consultants as City may deem reasonably necessary to process such applications. (d) Reimbursements. Buyer will have no obligations under the COSTCO Reimbursement Agreement as City will provide funding from the proceeds of the sale of the Property. Buyer shall pay the developer of the Reserves site the amount of $62,995, as set forth in the Reimbursement Agreement for the Reserves project, and provide City with proof of payment prior to or at issuance of the first building permit or grading permit for the Project. Buyer shall also pay Redwood Equities Investments the amount of $83,585.35, as determined by the Reimbursement Agreement for the Stadium Lands Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and provide City with proof of payment prior to or at issuance of the first building permit or grading permit for the Project. 10. General Provisions. (a) Assignments. Assignments of Buyer's rights and obligations under the DA would be subject to City's review and approval, in City's reasonable discretion which will not be unreasonably withheld. Any assignment, other than reasonable financing requirements, would be documented by an assignment and assumption agreement in a form reasonably acceptable to City. (b) Remedies/Default/Termination. The DA would include standard provisions for notice of default and opportunity to cure. In the event of default by City, the only remedy would be specific performance of the terms and provisions of the DA. In event of default by Buyer, the primary remedy would be specific performance of the terms and provisions of the DA. A claim for actual monetary damages would only be considered if specific performance is not granted by a court. In no event would either party be entitled to any consequential, punitive or special damages. City and Buyer would be required to follow the procedures set forth in Government Code sections 65867 and 65868, with a hearing before the City Council, prior to termination of the DA. In the event of termination, the only surviving provisions would be the Buyer's indemnification of City. A default under the Development Agreement would also be a default under the Purchase and Sale Agreement, by which the Property is transferred, and a default under the Purchase and Sale Agreement would also be a default under the Development Agreement. (c) Indemnity. Buyer would defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney, in any action brought by a third party to challenge the DA, including the related environmental review. In addition, Buyer would OAK #4843-8194-5898 Q Exhibit B-2-4 defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City for any claims arising out of the development and construction of the Project. (d) Annual Review. Buyer would provide City with annual written documentation demonstrating good faith compliance with the terms of the Development Agreement. If the City determines that Buyer has not complied in good faith, the Buyer shall have 30 days from written notice of default to cure the default, otherwise the City may terminate the DA in accordance with Government Code section 65865.1. (e) Application Approval. City's signature on planning applications as property owner shall not grant approval of applications. City retains its full discretionary authority regarding approval of planning and other land use approvals regardless of signature by City as property owner on such applications. OAK #4843-8194-5898 Q Exhibit B-2-5 HOTEL PARCEL 3 Attachment I Depiction of Martin Avenue Improvements 19' 5.5' _ 0.50' r Sw ------- 2X lAC EXHIBIT B-2 ATTACHMENT 1 PORTION TO BE REIMBURSED BY a 15' 13' T T 2%1�. a' P 0.50'4.5' FUTURE SW 2% `CURB & FALL ACL 2 AB AWAY GUTTER CURB & GUTTER—' MARTIN AVENUE PER CITY STD PRIVATE STREET SECTION ALONG CITY—PARCEL 5 FRONTAGE NO SCALE RESIDENTIAL — PARCEL 2 LEQEND I RETAIL — PARCEL 4 3 CITY — PARCEL 5 -PORTION OF MARTIN AVE. TO BE REIMBURSED BY CITY PLAN SCALE: 1'=200' IMIPORTION OF MARTIN AVE. TO BE REIMBURSED BY CITY PORTION OF MARTIN AVE. TO BE FUNDED SOLELY BY DEVELOPER NOVEMBER 2015 OAK #4843-8194-5898 Q Exhibit B-2-6 CITY LANDS PARCEL 5 r PORTION OF MARTIN AVE. TO BE FUNDED SOLELY BY DEVELOPER 0 200 500 SCAL FP i' — 200' EXHIBIT C-1 FORM OF GRANT DEED RECORDING REQUESTED BY Title Insurance Company AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Attention: (Space Above This Line for Recorder's Use Only) [Exempt from recording fee per Gov. Code § 27383] GRANT DEED For valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, a California municipal corporation ("Grantor"), hereby grants to STADIUM RP DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, a California limited liability corporation (collectively, "Grantee"), all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in the real property described in Attachment 1 attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property"). I" Ly, "111 City of Rohnert Park Dated: , 201_ By: ATTEST: [FORM— Do NOT EXECUTE] , Mayor [signature must be notarized] City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney EXHIBIT C -I OAK 44825-3884-0612 v9 Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Communityfor Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November 22, 2016 Department: Development Services Submitted By: Jeffrey S. Beiswenger, AICP, Planning Manager Prepared By: Zach Tusinger, Planner I ITEM NO. 6D 1 Agenda Title: Adoption of Ordinance No. 901 Amending Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) of the Zoning Ordinance to Adopt Development Standards for the Priority Development Area Plan RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 901 to amend Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) of the Rohnert Park Zoning Ordinance. BACKGROUND: Ordinance No. 901 originates from an oversight earlier this year. As part of the Central Rohnert Park Priority Development Area (PDA) Plan adoption, several associated amendments to the Rohnert Park Zoning Ordinance were packaged together for adoption. This occurred successfully at the Planning Commission level. When the package reached the City Council for review and adoption, the exhibit detailing the code revisions and additions for Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) was inadvertently not included as an attachment to Ordinance No. 897. As a result, the revised development standards needed to fully implement the PDA have not been adopted. Two new zoning districts were created with the PDA: Downtown Mixed -Use (DTM-U) and Downtown High Density Residential (DTR -H). Both are reliant on the proposed amendments to Chapter 17.10 to codify setbacks, building heights and other development standards that apply to these districts. While these Zoning Code amendments were recommended by the Planning Commission as noted above, the amendments were inadvertently omitted from the Council Packet and have not yet been formally adopted. Adopting Ordinance No. 901 would rectify this oversight and ensure that the PDA can be fully implemented in the City's Zoning Code. On November 8, 2016 staff brought forward the first reading of this ordinance for consideration by the City Council which received a majority vote of five to none. ANALYSIS: When it approved the PDA Plan, the City Council also adopted General Plan Amendments in order to implement the vision outlined in the PDA. The ordinance will implement the amended General Plan and will result in the following specific rezoning actions: • High Density Residential (R -H). The maximum residential density in this zone would be reduced from 30 units per acre to 24 units per acre. This action is to ensure consistency with the adopted General Plan. • Downtown High Density Residential (DTR -H). The Downtown High Density Residential (DTR -H) would be added to include modified development standards, including densities ITEM NO. 6D1 of up to 30 units per acre, and maximum building heights of up to 60 feet. The goal of this action is to create an area in the City where taller, denser residential development helps to activate the downtown area. • Downtown Mixed -Use (DTM-U). The Downtown Mixed -Use (DTM-U) would be added to include modified development allowing for densities of up to 45 units per acre. Residential development would only be permitted as part of mixed-use projects. The goal of this action is to create a vibrant mixed-use area within the City's downtown core. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: The proposed amendments were contemplated and covered in the Central Rohnert Park Priority Development Plan Environmental Impact Report which was certified and adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2016-027 on March 8, 2016. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: None. This action is necessary to fully implement the adopted PDA Plan. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This action is consistent with Strategic Plan Goal D: Continue to develop a vibrant community. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: This action results in the modest fiscal impact associated with the staff time necessary to prepare the ordinance and modify the Zoning Code. These activities can be covered within the scope of Development Services approved operational budget. Department Head Approval Date: 11/16/16 Finance Director Approval Date: N/A City Attorney Approval Date: N/A City Manager Approval Date: N/A Attachments (list in packet assembly order): 1. Ordinance No. 901 with Exhibit A -Changes to Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) OA ORDINANCE NO. 901 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.10 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADOPT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN WHEREAS, the applicant, City of Rohnert Park, filed Planning Application No. PLRZ2016-0001 proposing to amend the Zoning Map and the Rohnert Park Zoning Ordinance by amending Chapter 17.06 (Land Use Regulations), Chapter 17.07 (Land Use Footnotes/Special Provisions), and Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) of the City of Rohnert Park Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on February 25, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the proposed changes to Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards); and WHEREAS, on March 8 and March 22, 2016, the City Council held a public hearing at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the proposal; and WHEREAS, the amendments to the Zoning Map and the Rohnert Park Zoning Ordinance Chapters 17.06 (Land Use Regulations) and 17.07 (Land Use Footnotes/Special Provisions) were approved by Ordinance Number 897, which was adopted March 22, 2016; and WHEREAS, Ordinance Number 897 inadvertently omitted the exhibit amending Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards); and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) are attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) are necessary to implement the Central Rohnert Park, Priority Development Area Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council certified and adopted the EIR prepared for the Priority Development Area Plan by adoption of Resolution No. 2016-027, on March 8, 2016 and has otherwise carried out all requirements for the Plan pursuant to CEQA; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California State Law and the Rohnert Park Municipal Code, a public hearing was published for a minimum of 10 days prior to the first public hearing in the Community Voice; and Ord. 901 WHEREAS, on November 8, 2016 the City Council held a public hearing at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the proposal; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Zoning Ordinance amendment application for the proposal; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Recitals and Evidence. The above recitations are true and correct. In making its findings, the City Council relied upon and hereby incorporates by reference all staff reports, presentations, and other documentation presented to the Council in the meeting. Section 2. Environmental Review. The City Council approved the Final EIR for the Priority Development Area Plan, as described in City Council Resolution No. 2016-027, on March 8, 2016. Section 3. Findings for Enactment of Amendments to Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance. The City Council hereby makes the following findings concerning amendments to Chapter 17.10 (Development Standards) of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. That the proposed amendments to the Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance are consistent with the General Plan 2020. Criteria Satisfied. The proposed amendments are consistent with General Plan 2020 as amended by Resolution 2016-027, which was adopted March 22, 2016. The general plan amendments amended general plan land use diagrams which are consistent with the proposed zoning map changes and with the Central Rohnert Park, Priority Development Area Plan. The general plan amendments also added goals and policies to General Plan 2020 which are supportive of the zoning ordinance text amendments, these include: 1. Amending 17.10 (Development Standards) to add standards for the DTR -H and DTM-U zoning districts. 2. That the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance will be beneficial to the public health, safety or welfare. Criteria Satisfied. The proposed amendments will implement the vision for a walkable, mixed-use downtown area established by Central Rohnert Park, Priority Development Area plan and will be beneficial to the public health, safety and welfare by creating more development activity, living and shopping opportunities in the central part of Rohnert Park. An EIR was completed to demonstrate that the plan will have minimal negative impacts to the public health, safety or welfare. Ord. 901 Section 4. Approval of Municipal Code Amendments. The City Council hereby approves the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and deletes Chapter 17.10 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code on Development Standards, and replaces it with that shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full. Section 5. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that every section, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase of this ordinance is severable. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason found to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity, or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effective 30 days after its adoption, and shall be published and posted as required by law. Section 7. Publication. The City Clerk is directed to cause this ordinance to be published in the manner required by law. [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.] Ord. 901 This ordinance was introduced by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park on November 8, 2016 and DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this November 22, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN CITY OF ROHNERT PARK: Gina Belforte, Mayor ATTEST: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney I, JOANNE BUERGLER, CITY CLERK of the City of Rohnert Park, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of November, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk 4 Ord. 901 Exhibit A Chapter 17.10 - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 17.10.010 - Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish the development standards for the zoning districts within the city of Rohnert Park. The development standards table gives the required site area and dimensional requirements for lots within each district, including maximum building heights, minimum building setbacks, minimum open space requirements, floor area ratios, and maximum lot coverages. Following the table are additional standards, dimensional requirements and exceptions. 17.10.020 - Development standards table. The following table and text are adopted as the city's basic development standards for the zoning districts within the city of Rohnert Park. To use the chart, find the appropriate zoning district on the left-hand side of the table. Read across the row for the zone in question and the development standards for that zone will appear in the corresponding columns. If a number appears in parentheses in the table, a further qualifier, requirement, or exception is listed by that number in the following listing of footnotes. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ZONING DISTRICTS Maximum Mini Minimum Mini Mini Maxim Mini Maxi Maxi Mini Mini Building mum Side Yard mum mum um mum mum mum Zoni mum mum Height Front Setback Open Lot Residen Rear Floor Lot ng Lot Lot (Feet) Yard (Feet) Space Size tial Yard Area Cover Dist Width Depth Setba Per (Sq. Density Setba Ratio age rict (Feet) (Feet) Prim Acces ck Unit Ft.) (Units/ Inter Cor ck (FAR) (Perce (1) (1)(2) (1) Acre) ary sory (Feet) for ner (Feet) (Sq. Factor nt) 1 (3) (4) (5) 1 1 Ft.) 40,00 0 100 150 1.0 1 35 12 50 10 20 50 N.A. N.A. 1 30 17,00 R -E 100 150 2.0 35 12 25 10 20 25 N.A. N.A. 40 0 R -L 5,000 50 100 6.0 35 12 20 5 1 10 (10) N.A. 0.4 50 R -M 3,700 40 80 12.0 35 12 20 5 10 20 �00 0.55 40 (10) (13) (14) (18) F5 R -H 10,00 60 100 24.0 45 12 20 (10)( 10 20 400 1.15 40 0 11) (13) (14) (18) 5 Ord. 901 DTR -H 10,00 0 60 100 30.0 60 15 20 (p) (11) 10 20 (20) (13) 400 (14) 1.15 (18) 40 C-0 10,00 60 - 100 N.A. 45 N.A. 15 (10) 15 10 i N.A. 1.0 50 C -N 10,00 50 100 N.A. 35 N.A. 15 (10) 15 10 N.A. 0.4 60 C-R 20,00 50 100 N.A. 65 N.A. 15 (10) 15 10 N.A. 0.4 60 I -L 20,00 0 100 100 N.A. 45 N.A. 15 10 15 10 N.A. 0.5 (16) 60 M -U 10,00 0 60 (9) 100 (9) 24 (7) 45 12 10 (9) 10 10(g) 200 (9) 1.5 (17) 80 10 (9) DT M -U 10,00 0 60 (9) 100 (9) 0/35 60 12 (7)(19) 10 (9) 10 (9) 10 10(g) (9) 200 1.5 (17) 80 PI 10,00 p N.A. N.A. N.A. 45 N.A. 10 15 10 N.A. 15 0.5 50 OS- N.A. N.A. I N.A. 1.0 (8) 35 N.A. 20 20 25 I N.A. I N.A. 25 N.A. TN.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. EC EC N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 35 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. (1) The lot minimums listed do not apply to the condominium parcelization of a project where land is being divided for individual building envelopes. Further, for lots within subdivisions approved prior to January 2003, the minimum lot size shall be that shown on the approved subdivision map. (2) The minimum width of a residential corner lot shall be ten percent greater than the minimum lot width for a given district. (3) Towers, spires, cupolas, chimneys, elevator penthouses, water tanks, monuments, and similar structures and necessary mechanical appurtenances covering not more than twenty percent of the top floor roof area may exceed by eight feet the maximum permitted height in the underlying zoning district by conditional use permit. (4) See Section 17.10.060 for additional requirements for accessory structures. 6 Ord. 901 (5) Front porches may project up to five feet into the front yard setback. Front yard and street side setbacks shall be reserved for landscaping only, excluding driveways for ingress and egress and front porch projections. For lots within subdivisions approved prior to January 2003, front yard setbacks shall be as shown on the approved subdivision map. (6) A minimum lot size of four thousand five hundred square feet may be allowed in the R -L District for projects that utilize design features such as clustering and common open space areas. (7) Maximum density within the M -U District shall be dependent on the dimensional requirements of the property (e.g. setbacks, FAR, parking). (8) Applies only to the developable portion of any property within the OS -ARC District. (9) In the M -U District, front, rear, and/or side yard setbacks maybe reduced or eliminated if approved by the planning commission and if structures remain outside of an easement and comply with city approved design guidelines. (10) The interior side yard setback may be eliminated for attached dwelling units in the R -M and R -H Districts, provided the applicable building code requirements can be met. (11) In the R -H and C -O Districts, interior side yards shall be increased by one foot for every foot of building over thirty-five feet. (12) The interior side yard setback may be eliminated for attached commercial units in the C -N and C-R Districts, provided the applicable building code requirements can be met. (13) The rear yard setbacks may be reduced to ten feet for one-story building additions that are no wider than fifty percent of the buildable width of the lot. (14) This shall include private open space of a minimum area of one hundred square feet when on ground level and/or sixty square feet if equal to or greater than six feet above ground. (15) F.A.R. of 1.5 is allowed for hotel and motel projects in the C-R District. (16) F.A.R. of 1.0 is allowed for industrial projects that are approved by the planning commission and meet criteria set forth in city approved design guidelines. (17) F.A.R. of 1.5 is the maximum for non-residential projects; an F.A.R. of 2.0 is allowed for mixed residential/residential projects. (18) The maximum sizes for housing units shall be as provided for in Section 17.10.070 of this chapter. (19) Residential units are only permitted in the DTM-U if 50% or more of the total building square footage is non-residential or if 75% or more of the ground floor is designed for an active retail or service use (e.g. restaurant, shop, beauty salon, etc.) (20) The corner sideyard setback may be reduced to five feet for buildings that address the street with units accessible from the public sidewalk. Yard Diagram 7 Ord. 901 Rear Yard Rear Yard r I T PLIC ' Skie Yard STREET - STREETI.,, . X N� � Side Side PUBILf [wa Rear I 56da 51tle Yard Yard I STREET Front Yard Yard r Yard Yard Sipe Yard I Front Yard From Yard Corner Lot "erior Lot Comer Lot PLIBUC STREET (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.10.030 - Legally established yard setbacks. On any property line where there is a legally established side or rear yard building setback line less than that required by the standards established by this ordinance, that setback may be continued when expanding a structure for a use permitted by the zoning district in which the property is located, provided maximum lot coverage is not exceeded and all other required setbacks apply. This provision does not apply to expansions into front yard setbacks. (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.10.040 - Projections into yards. Projections into required yard setbacks shall be permitted as follows, provided that no projection shall extend into a public utility easement: A. Projecting features such as balconies, sills, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, covered porches, awnings, cornices, eaves, and ornamental features may extend into a required side yard or a space between structures that is five feet or more in width not more than two feet and may extend into a required front or rear yard not more than four feet. B. Open, unenclosed, uncovered balconies, landings, platforms, patios, decks, porches, stairways, terraces, and vehicular access drives and parking and loading areas, no part of which is more than four feet above the grade of the ground, may extend into a required rear or side yard to within three feet of the property line or the required space between buildings. C. Attached patio covers may feature supporting members that encroach to within ten feet of a rear property line and to within five feet of a side property line, with eaves allowed to extend an additional two feet into these setbacks. Yard Projections 8 Ord. 901 U" IM Wor 4 PPd M b" (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.10.050 - Required separations between structures. A. The minimum separation between main structures or between main structures connected by a breezeway shall be ten feet, with an additional one foot of separation required for every foot that a structure exceeds a height of thirty-five feet. B. The minimum distance between any main structure and any detached accessory structure shall be five feet. Any structure that is set back five feet or less from a main structure shall be considered an attached structure for setback purposes and must comply with all dimensional requirements that pertain to the main structure. Separations between Buildings/Accessory Building Setbacks (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.10.060 - Accessory structures. A. Detached/attached. Detached accessory structures (i.e. structures separated from the main structure by five feet or more) shall be located behind the front elevation of the main structure and shall cover no more than ten percent of the rear yard area, with total lot coverage for all structures on-site not to exceed that listed in Section 17.10.020 for the applicable zoning district. In the event an accessory building is attached to the main building or less than five feet from the main structure, it shall be considered structurally a part of the main building and shall comply in all respects with the development standards applicable to the main building. B. Setbacks for accessory structures. The minimum side and rear yard setback for carports is five feet and for all other accessory structures the setback is three feet. C. Accessory building as a second unit. If the accessory building is a second residential unit, a ten foot rear yard setback and five foot side yard setbacks must be provided. In the case of a corner lot adjacent 9 Ord. 901 to a reversed frontage lot, accessory buildings shall not project beyond the front yard required or existing on the adjacent reversed frontage lot. D. Building permits requirements. Building permits are not required for detached accessory structures that are one hundred twenty-eight square feet or less in size, that are no greater than twelve feet in height, that are not habitable, and that do not require utilities. Accessory structures shall not include kitchens, unless part of an approved second unit. (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.10.070 - Maximum size of housing units. A. The maximum square footage of housing units (including garages and accessory structures) shall be determined by the following formulas for the respective zoning districts. (Note: These maximums do not apply to units allowed through a density bonus arrangement.): R -L (Low Density Residential): 600 sq. ft. + F.A.R. Factor (0.40) x Net Lot Area R -M (Medium Density Residential): 400 sq. ft. + F.A.R. Factor (0.40 for detached; 0.55 for attached) x Net Lot Area R -H (High Density Residential) F.A.R. Factor (1.15) x Net Lot Area DTR -H (Downtown High Density Not applicable Residential) B. The planning commission may allow an increase in the floor area ratio factor (FAR) for a residential property within an R -L or R -M district, subject to the granting of a use permit, in accord with the provisions of Section 17.25.010, Conditional Use Permits, if the following findings can be made: 1. The maximum lot coverage for the property would not exceed that permitted for the zoning district; 2. The required setbacks and height limitations of the zoning district can be met for all structures; 3. A usable outdoor area (at least one minimum dimension of fifteen feet) for residents would be maintained on the lot; 4. The issuance of the use permit would not infringe on the privacy or light and air easements of adjacent properties; 5. The total FAR for the lot would not exceed .55. (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.10.080 - Reasonable accommodation. A. Purpose. It is the purpose of this section to provide reasonable accommodations in the City's zoning and land use regulations, policies, and practices when needed to provide an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. 10 Ord. 901 This section provides a procedure to request reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities seeking equal access to housing under the Federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (the Acts) in the application of zoning laws and other land use regulations, policies and procedures. B. Reasonable accommodation. A request for reasonable accommodation may be made by any person with a disability, their representative or any entity, when the application of a zoning law or other land use regulation, policy or practice acts as a barrier to fair housing opportunities. A person with a qualifying disability under the Acts. Generally, a person with a disability is a person who has a physical or mental impairment that limits or substantially limits one or more major live activities, anyone who is regarded as having such impairment or anyone who has a record of such impairment. The proceeding definition of a person with a disability and this section are intended to apply to those persons who are defined as disabled under the Acts as they may be amended from time to time. A request for reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the rules, standards and practices for the siting, development and use of housing or housing- related facilities that would eliminate regulatory barriers and provide a person with a disability equal opportunity to housing of their choice. Requests for reasonable accommodation shall be made in the manner prescribed by Section 17.10.080.C, Process. C. Process. (1) Applicant. A request for a reasonable accommodation may be made by any person with a disability, his or her representative, or a developer or provider of housing for individuals with a disability. (2) Application. An application for a reasonable accommodation shall be made on an application form provided by the planning division. If an individual needs assistance in making the request for reasonable accommodation, the city will provide assistance to ensure that the process is accessible. (3) Review with other land use applications or discretionary permits. If the project for which the request for reasonable accommodation is made requires another discretionary permit or approval (including but not limited to; conditional use permit, design review, general plan amendment, zone change, etc.), the applicant may file the request for reasonable accommodation together with the application for the other discretionary permit or approval. The processing procedures of the discretionary permit shall govern the joint processing of both the reasonable accommodation and the discretionary permit. (4) Required submittals. An application for a reasonable accommodation shall include the following: a. Documentation that the applicant is: (i) a person with a disability; (ii) applying on behalf of one or more persons with a disability; or (iii) a developer or provider of housing for one or more persons with a disability. b. The name and address of the individual(s) requesting the reasonable accommodation. c. The name and address of the property owner(s). d. The address of the property for which accommodation is requested. e. The current use of the property. f. A description of the reasonable accommodation requested by the applicant and why the reasonable accommodation is necessary to make the specific property accessible to the individual. g. Where applicable, documentation that the requested accommodation is designed and constructed pursuant to Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations to allow access, circulation and full use of the building and facilities by persons with disabilities. 11 Ord. 901 (5) The planning director may request additional information from the applicant if the application does not provide sufficient information for the city to make the findings required in Section E. D. Review authority. (1) Development services director. Requests for reasonable accommodation shall be reviewed by the development services director (director), or his designee if the request for reasonable accommodation is not filed concurrently with another discretionary permit or approval. (2) Other review authority. Requests for reasonable accommodation submitted for concurrent review with another discretionary land use application shall be reviewed by the authority reviewing the discretionary land use application. E. Review procedure. (1) Director review. The director, or his designee, shall make a written determination within 45 days and either grant, grant with modifications, or deny a request for reasonable accommodation in accordance with Section 17.10.080.F., Findings and Decision. (2) Other reviewing authority. The written determination on whether to grant or deny the request for reasonable accommodation shall be made by the authority responsible for reviewing the discretionary land use application in compliance with the applicable review procedure for the discretionary review. The written determination to grant or deny the request for reasonable accommodation shall be made in accordance with Section 17.10.080.F, Findings and Decision. Findings and decision. (1) Findings. The written decision to grant or deny a request for reasonable accommodation will be consistent with the Acts and shall be based on the following findings, all of which are required for approval: a. The housing that is the subject of the request will be used by an individual with a disability under the Acts. b. The request for reasonable accommodation is necessary to make specific housing available to an individual with a disability under the Acts. c. The requested reasonable accommodation would not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the city as "undue financial or administrative burden" is defined in the Acts. d. The requested reasonable accommodation would not result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a city program or law, including but not limited to land use and zoning, as "fundamental alteration" is defined in the Acts. e. The requested reasonable accommodation will not, under the specific facts of the case, result in a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals or substantial physical damage to the property of others. (2) Conditions of approval. In granting a request for reasonable accommodation, the reviewing authority may impose any conditions of approval deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the reasonable accommodation would comply with the findings required by subsection (1) above. In making the findings in subsection (1) above, the reviewing authority may approve alternative reasonable accommodations which provide an equivalent level of benefit to the applicant. G. Appeal of determination. A determination by the reviewing authority to grant or deny a request for reasonable accommodation may be appealed to the planning commission. However, if the reviewing authority was the planning commission, a decision to grant or deny a request for a reasonable accommodation may be appealed to the city council. 12 Ord. 901 (Ord. No. 844, § 2(Exh. A), 3-13-2012) 13 Ord. 901 °„NEa PAR" ITEM NO. 6D2 Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Cniieaaxt" Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Meeting Date: November 22, 2016 Department: Development Services and Public Safety Submitted By: Mary Grace Pawson, Director of Development Services Brian Masterson, Director of Public Safety Prepared By: Jay Bradford, Chief Building Official Jim Thompson, Fire Marshal Agenda Title: Adoption of Ordinance No. 902 adopting by Reference the 2016 California Building Standards Code Including Proposed Local Amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 902 adopting by reference the 2016 California Building Standards Code, as amended to reflect local conditions (Attachment 1). BACKGROUND: On October 11, 2016, for discussion purposes, staff provided Council with an overview of the local amendments and fee schedule updates that are being proposed by the Chief Building Official and the Fire Marshal. The Council was generally supportive of the proposed amendments and fee scheduled changes but requested that staff make additional efforts to notify the building community of proposed changes. Staff has conducted an informational meeting with the building community, participated in the 12th Annual Inspectors Forum sponsored by the Redwood Empire Remodelers Association and reached out individually to interested parties regarding the proposed changes. On November 8, 2016 staff brought forward the first reading of the adopting ordinance and fee resolution for consideration by the City Council, which received a majority vote of five to none. ANALYSIS: Based on expressed findings of need supported by local climatic, geological or topographical conditions allowed by Health and Safety Code 17958.7 (a) and together with Stakeholder, community, and Council feedback, Staff recommends repealing Chapters 15.04 through 15.30 and 15.36 of Title 15 "Buildings and Construction" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code and adding section 15.04 (General Provisions And Penalties), 15.08 (Building Code), 15.12 (Residential Code), 15.16 (Electrical Code), 15.18 (Mechanical Code), 15.20 (Plumbing Code), 15.22 (Energy Code), 15.24 (Existing Building Code), 15.26 (Green Building Standards Code), 15.28 (Fire Code), and 15.30 (Administrative Citations For Fireworks) to Title 15 "Buildings And Construction" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: The adoption, implementation and enforcement of the 2016 Standards with local amendments support Strategic Plan Goal D — Continue to Develop a ITEM NO. 6D2 Vibrant Community. Approval of the recommended fee schedule changes aligns with Strategic Plan Goal B — Maintain Financial Stability. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: Staff has entertained multiple events and public hearings meant to engage stakeholders, the public and Council to illicit comments and direction regarding the proposed amendments to the 2016 California Building Standards Codes. That feedback was instrumental in crafting the scope of the amendments presented to Council on 11/8/2016 which received a majority vote of five to none. To date no further options have been considered. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: The fiscal impact of adopting the 2016 Standards with the proposed local amendments will be minimal, due to the changes to Development Services Fee Schedule that where adopted on 11/8/2016. Department Head Approval Date: 11/14/16 Finance Director Approval Date: N/A City Attorney Approval Date: 11/14/16 City Manager Approval Date: 11/16/16 Attachments (list in packet assembly order): An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park Adopting the 2016 California Building Standards Code by Reference, as Amended to Reflect Local Conditions, Repealing Chapters 15.04 through 15.30 and 15.36 of Title 15 "Buildings and Construction " of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code and Adding Section 15.04 (General Provisions and Penalties), 15.08 (Building Code), 15.12 (Residential Code), 15.16 (Electrical Code), 15.18 (Mechanical Code), 15.20 (Plumbing Code), 15.22 (Energy Code), 15.24 (Existing Building Code), 15.26 (Green Building Standards Code), 15.28 (Fire Code), and 15.30 (Administrative Citations for Fireworks) to Title 15 "Buildings and Construction" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code 2 ORDINANCE NO. 902 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, ADOPTING THE 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE BY REFERENCE, AS AMENDED TO REFLECT LOCAL CONDITIONS, REPEALING CHAPTERS 15.04 THROUGH 15.30 AND 15.36 OF TITLE 15 "BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION" OF THE ROHNERT PARK MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTION 15.04 (GENERAL PROVISIONS AND PENALTIES), 15.08 (BUILDING CODE), 15.12 (RESIDENTIAL CODE), 15.16 (ELECTRICAL CODE), 15.18 (MECHANICAL CODE), 15.20 (PLUMBING CODE), 15.22 (ENERGY CODE), 15.24 (EXISTING BUILDING CODE), 15.26 (GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE), 15.28 (FIRE CODE), AND 15.30 (ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS FOR FIREWORKS) TO TITLE 15 `BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION" OF THE ROHNERT PARK MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the City is responsible for local enforcement of the California Building Standards Code, also known as California Code of Regulations, Title 24; WHEREAS, the California Building Standards Code is updated by the California Building Standards Commission approximately every three years based upon published model codes specified in the California Health and Safety Code; WHEREAS, local jurisdictions responsible for enforcement of the California Building Standards Code must enact local administrative regulations in order to implement the California Building Standards Code; WHEREAS, on or before July 1, 2016, the California Building Standards Commission published the 2016 California Building Standards Code; WHEREAS, on January 1, 2017, the building standards and regulations contained in the 2016 California Building Standards Code become effective and applicable throughout the State of California; WHEREAS, it is sometimes necessary to amend the California Building Standards Code as allowed per the California Health and Safety Code due to climatic, geological, or topographical local conditions; WHEREAS, the appendices of any parts of the California Building Standards Code only apply to a local jurisdiction if specifically adopted by that agency or when specified by state law; WHEREAS, it is necessary to authorize the Building Official to require that licensed building contractors perform specified work when public health and safety is at risk; and WHEREAS, nothing in this ordinance is intended to duplicate, contradict, or enter a field which has been fully occupied by state law, including the California Building Standards Code. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds that: A. A public meeting introducing the proposed amendments to the Municipal Code was held by the City Council on November 8, 2016. B. In accordance with CEQA Section 15061(b) (3), this is not a project subject to CEQA in that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. C. This ordinance is enacted pursuant to and in compliance with Health & Safety Code Sections 17958.5, 17958.7, and as expressly permitted in Government Code Section 50022.2 to make local amendments to the California Building Standards Code. D. As required Health and Safety Code 17958.7 (a), the amendments to the California Building Standards Code adopted by this ordinance and as described in Chapters 15.08 through 15.30 are necessary for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare due to the local climatic, geologic or topographical conditions as described in findings 1 through 8 below. 1. Modification of California Building Code (CBC) Section 501.2 and California Fire Code (CFC) Sections 505.1, 505.1.1, 505.1.2, and 505.1.3 is necessary since due to the many street cul-de-sacs within the City and the distance between emergency response facilities, clearly visible street numbers on buildings, at all hours, are of necessity. 2. Modification of CBC Chapter 9, California Residential Code (CRC) Sections R313.2, R313.2.1, and R313.2.2 is necessary since the City is bisected by Highway 101 and the Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) rail corridor. The railroad and freeway create barriers, which obstruct traffic patterns and delay response time for fire equipment, and create the need for greater use of fire suppression systems. 3. Modification of CBC Section 1503.7, CRC Appendix Chapters H, J and V is necessary because the soil conditions within the City are highly expansive, thereby creating the potential for damage to building foundations as well as concrete slabs. Means are required to keep rainwater away from foundations and slabs, which would exacerbate expansive conditions and potentially damage structures. 4. Modification of CBC Section 1705A.13.5 is necessary because the City is located in a highly active seismic fault zones that has the potential of causing severe ground movement, ground shaking, ground failure, land siding, lateral spreading and ground liquefaction. Damage to buildings and infrastructure in the City could be quite severe. Additional inspections for seismic construction are a necessity. 5. Modification of CBC Sections 1808.6.2.1 and 1907.2 is necessary because the City experiences an unusually high water table, subjecting concrete slabs to excessive hydraulic pressure also resulting in the potential flooding within foundation crawl spaces. Page 2 Ord. 902 6. Modification of California Electrical Code (CEC) Section 230.79(C) is necessary because the City is bisected by Highway 101 and the SMART rail corridor. The railroad and freeway create barriers, which obstruct traffic patterns and delay response time for fire equipment, and create the need for upgrade to ageing and undersized electrical systems. 7. Modification of California Plumbing Code (CPC) Sections 301.2.6 and 604.1 is necessary because the soils within the City are considered acidic, creating a deleterious effect on metal piping placed underground. 8. Modification of CPC Appendix Chapters A, B, D, and I is necessary because water conservation is important in the region due to local geography and climate. Having alternatives for pipe sizing, use of gray water, and use of recycled water will help to conserve our water resources. 9. Modification of CFC Sections 320, 320.1, 903.2, 903.2.20, 903.2.21, and 5614.1 through 5614.13 is necessary because the City, on average, experiences an approximate annual rainfall of 40 inches. This rainfall can normally be expected between October and April. During the winter months, the City may experience periods of heavy rain, which causes local flooding. Winter storms are often accompanied by high winds, which have uprooted trees and damaged power lines. The City has also experienced periods of heavy fog, which has delayed the responding fire apparatus and prevented early discovery of structure fires. During the dry period, temperatures range from 70 degrees to over 100 degrees. These temperatures are often accompanied by light to gusty winds, which when coupled with highly flammable vegetation, can cause uncontrollable fires. With increased development spreading into the brush covered foothill area, wind driven fires could have severe consequences, as has been demonstrated on several occasions throughout the state. 10. Modification of CFC Sections 202, 901.6.1.1 through 901.6.1.4, 907.2, 907.2.9, and Appendix Chapters A through N is necessary because the City is susceptible to seismic hazards resulting from movement along any one of several known faults in the area. The most serious direct earthquake hazard threat is from the damage or collapse of buildings and other structures due to ground movement. In addition to damage caused by earthquakes, there is the possibility of earthquake -induced fires starting because of damage to gas lines, power lines or heat producing appliances and the unavailability of water for fire control due to broken water mains. In the event of a major earthquake many areas of the City may not be accessible to emergency equipment and, if bridges or roads are damaged, the City may be isolated from outside assistance. 11. Modification of CFC Sections 507.5.1, 903.3.1, 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.1.1 exemption, 903.3.1.2, 903.4, 903.4.1, 903.4.2.1, B105.1, B105.2, Table B105.2 footnotes, , Table C102.1, D103.2 through D103.4, D103.6, D106.1, D106.2, 5601.1.1.3(5), 5602. 1, Chapter 80, NFPAI3D, Section 5.1.1.2 and Chapter 80, NFPAI3D, Section 8.2.4.1 is Page 3 Ord. 902 necessary because the City is divided by Highway 101 and the SMART rail corridor. The railroad and freeway create barriers, which obstruct traffic patterns and delay response time for fire equipment. The water supply within the City is directly affected by the topographical layout. The City water system is currently pressured from the Sonoma County Water Agency aqueduct inter -tie. In the event of a major catastrophe, the City does not have an elevated water storage system to supply pressured water to the City fire hydrants. While it is clearly understood that the adoption of the amendments to the California Building Standards Code and the adoption of Ordinances may not prevent the incidence of fire or potential building hazards, it is noted the implementation of these various amendments will reduce the severity and potential loss of life and loss of property. The following revisions to the Rohnert Park Municipal Code are made based on the findings set forth above and the record of proceedings for consideration of this Ordinance. SECTION 2. Chapter 15.04, "General Provisions and Penalties" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed and replaced the follows: "Chapter 15.04 - General Provisions and Penalties Section 15.04.010 - Local administrative authority defined. Excepting California Building Code Appendix JGrading, which is administered by the city engineer, and State Fire Marshal regulated sections of California Building Code and California Residential Code, which is administered by the fire code official, whenever the term "local administrative authority" or "authority having jurisdiction" is used in the codes adopted by Chapters 15.04 through 15.32, excepting Chapters 15.28 and 15.30, in reference to a local official charged with the responsibility of carrying out the regulations adopted by said code, such local official shall be the building official. Said building official shall have all authority given to such official by said code. Section 15.04.020 - Penalties for violation. In addition to any other penalties that may be provided at law, any person, firm, corporation, or other entity violating any of the provisions of Chapters 15.04 through 15.32, or any of the provisions of the codes, as amended, adopted by reference in Chapters 15.04 through 15.32, is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or both. In the discretion of the citing officer, the penalties set forth above may not apply to violations of Chapters 15.04 through 15.32 where more specific penalty provisions exist. Every such violation shall be deemed a separate offense for each day or portion thereof during which such violation continues. Section 15.04.030 - References to prior code. Page 4 Ord. 902 Unless superseded and expressly repealed, references in the local jurisdictions forms, documents and regulations to the Chapters and Sections of the past adopted regulations of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code, Title 15 - Building and Construction shall be construed to apply to the corresponding provisions contain within the currently adopted Rohnert Park Municipal Code, Title 15 - Building and Construction and all other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby superseded and expressly repealed. Section 15.04.040 - Adopted - Administrative provisions. "2016 California Building Code, Chapter 1, Division II - "Scope and Administration," adopted in its entirety: The provisions of the 2016 California Building Code, Chapter 1, Division II - Scope and Administration is adopted by reference, subject to the following additions and amendments to certain sections thereof which shall read and provide as set forth in this Chapter, and shall apply to all locally enforced parts of California Code of Regulations, Title 24." Section 105.8 - Added - Permit application date. Subject to California Building Code, Chapter 1, Division I Section 1. 1.9 - Effective date of this code, only those standards approved by the California Building Standards Commission and amended by Rohnert Park Municipal Code, Title 15 - Building and Construction that are effective at the time an application for building permit is submitted shall apply to the plans and specifications for, and to the construction performed under, that permit. Production home permit application submissions for which a master home permit application has been submitted to the enforcing agency, which contains all required documents referenced in the local jurisdiction's Residential Plan Submittal Requirements Guidelines, prior to the effective date of any new code may not be required to comply with such new code, but that of the code effective when the master home permit application was submitted, provided the master home permit application is submitted within one year of the effective date of the new code. Section 109.6 - Added - Refunds. Refunds of fees paid may be made, subject to the following: A. Applications for refunds must be made in writing to the building official within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date the fee is paid. All applicants made after one hundred eighty (180) days will be rejected. Page 5 Ord. 902 B. One hundred per cent (100%) of a fee erroneously paid or collected may be refunded. C. Ninety percent (90%) of the plan review fee may be refunded when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or cancelled or expires or becomes void before any plan review effort has been expended. No portion of the plan review fee shall be refunded when any plan review effort has been performed. D. Ninety percent (90%) of the building, plumbing, electrical, and/or mechanical permit fee may be refunded when a permit for which some or all of these permit fees have been paid is withdrawn or cancelled or expires or becomes void before any work was done and before any inspections are performed. No portion of these fees shall be refunded when any work was done and/or any inspections have been performed. E. The building official may authorize the refund of all or part of a fee in order to correct an error by the department. The details of such a refund shall be retained in project file. Section 109.7 - Added - Fee adjustments. Any adjustments to fees are subject to the following: A. Application for a fee adjustment must be made in writing to the building official within thirty (30) days of the date the fee is issued. B. The building official may authorize the adjustment of all or part of a fee in order to correct an error by the department. The details of such an adjustment shall be retained in project file. Section 109.8 - Added - Fee collections. Any unpaid fees shall be subject to the same collection measures outlined in Section 1.27 of this Title. Section 110.7 - Added - Concealed construction. Any and all portions of work covered or concealed without authorization by the building official shall be uncovered or unconcealed to allow for inspections set forth in Sections 110.3.1 - 110.3.10. The local jurisdiction's "Concealed Construction Verification Guidelines" shall be used to determine compliance with this section. Page 6 Ord. 902 Section 113.4 - Added - Appeals applications. All applications for appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official relative to the application and interpretation of this code shall be subject the local jurisdiction's "Board of Appeals (Building Department) Guidelines" as prepared by the building official and fees as outlined in the Building Plan Check, Inspection and Permit Fees Schedule as established or amended by City Council resolution. Section 114.2 - Amended - Notice of violation. The building official is authorized to serve a notice of violation or order on the person responsible for the erection, construction, alteration, extension, repair, moving, removal, demolition or occupancy of a building or structure in violation of the provisions of this code, or in violation of a permit or certificate issued under the provisions of this code. Such order shall direct the discontinuance of the illegal action or condition and the abatement of the violation. Method of service shall be subject to Section 116.4. Section 114.3 - Added - Prosecution of violation. Added after first paragraph. In addition if the notice of violation is not complied with within thirty (30) days the local jurisdiction may deem the structure unsafe and subject to the terms of Section 116. Section 114.4 - Amended - Violation penalties. All persons and construction shall be subject to the following: A. Any and all portions of work shall be complete and free of correction notices and or violations prior to the expiration of the permit or certificate authorizing said work or occupancy. The local jurisdiction's Outstanding Correction Notifications and Expired Permits or Certificates Guidelines shall be used to determine compliance with this section and the applicability of fines for non- compliance. B. Any and all portions of work completed without required permits shall be charged a fine of twice the cost of the plan review and inspection fee. C. Any person who violates a provision of this code or fails to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who erects, constructs, alters or repairs a building or structure in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the building official, or of a permit or Page 7 Ord. 902 certificate issued under the provisions of this code, shall be subject to penalties as prescribed by law. Section 114.5 - Added - Fee or fine adjustments. Any adjustments to fines are subject to the following: A. Application for a fine adjustment must be made in writing to the building official within thirty (30) days of the date the fine is issued. B. The building official may authorize the adjustment of all or part of a fine in order to correct an error by the department. The details of such an adjustment shall be retained in project file. Section 114.6 - Added - Fine collections. Any unpaid fines shall be subject to the same collection measures outlined in Section 1.27 of this Title. Section 117.1 - Added - Licensed contractor required When a permit is taken out by the property owner or their authorized representative both of which are without a valid California contractor's license, the building official is authorized to require the work, or portion of work, authorized by a the permit to be performed by a licensed California contractor if the building official determines the public safety and welfare is at risk." SECTION 3. Chapter 15.08, "Building Code" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed and replaced the follows: "Chapter 15.08 - Building Code 15.08.010 - Adopted - 2016 California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 2, "California Building Code". The 2016 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, incorporating the International Building Code, 2015 Edition, published by the International Code Council, one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official, is adopted by reference, subject to the following additions and amendments to certain sections thereof which shall read and provide as set forth in this Chapter. Section 501.2 - Amended - Address Numbers. Page 8 Ord. 902 Address numbers shall meet the requirements specified in Section 15.28.505.1.1- 15.28.505.1.3 of this Title. Section 1503.7 - Added - Splash Protection. All buildings of Group R Occupancy shall include a concrete landing at the exterior of garage side doors. The landing area shall be a minimum of nine sq. ft. (3'x3'). Group R and U structures shall include rain gutters, downspouts, rain leaders and splash blocks. Section 1705A.13.5 - Added - Special seismic inspector. Third -Parry Inspection. All new structures consisting of R-1, R-3 & R-6 Occupancies or A, B, E, F, H, 1, M Occupancies with an occupant load of fifty or greater, shall employ a third -party inspector for the purpose of inspecting the components of the lateral load system. Third -party inspectors, similar to special inspectors as required elsewhere in Chapter 17A, shall be approved by the building official. All costs associated with the special seismic inspection process shall be borne by the developer. Section 1808.6.2.1 - Added - Slab -on -grade foundations. A. Unless conforming to Section 1808 in its entirety and other than pre- or post -tensioned slabs and engineered pier and grade beam foundations systems, buildings utilizing slab on grade construction shall be constructed on a building pad consisting of a minimum of thirty inches of engineered non -expansive fill material meeting the requirements of Table 1 below. The building pad area to receive the engineered non - expansive fill shall include an area at least five feet beyond the outside edge of the building foundation. The building pad area shall be over excavated to the proper depth and the grade scarified to a minimum depth of eight inches and shall be moisture conditioned and re - compacted to a minimum of ninety percent over optimum. The engineered non -expansive fill shall be placed in lifts not exceeding eight inches, brought to near optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum of ninety percent of maximum dry density at or within two percent of the optimum moisture content. The depth of the engineered non -expansive fill shall be increased as necessary to maintain a minimum of twelve inches of the engineered non -expansive fill material under all footings, unless determined otherwise by the soils report/geotechnical engineer and approved by the building official. Lime treatment is an acceptable alternative to engineered non -expansive fill, providing that it is described within the project geotechnical report as an allowable alternative. Table 1. Non -expansive Fill Requirements Page 9 Ord. 902 Plasticity Index less than 13 Liquid Limit less than 50 Percent Soil Passing #200 Sieve between 5% & 45% Maximum Aggregate Size 3 inches Maximum Dry Density as determined by ASTM -D 1557 test procedures B. Except for residential additions of five hundred square feet or less and Group U buildings of five hundred square feet or less, all foundation designs shall reference a current site specific soils investigation report. The allowable area requirements of this subsection may be increased to one thousand square feet for R-3 construction when a request is submitted in writing to the building official and the building official approves such request. Section 1907.2 - Added - Nonstructural concrete minimum reinforcement. All nonstructural concrete slabs within the building the building envelope are subject to the following. 1. All slabs shall have a minimum reinforcement of #3 rebar placed eighteen inches on center, each way. Reinforcement shall be placed on suitably sized supports, concrete cubes, or similar material approved by the building official, so as to suspend the reinforcement to mid plane in the slab. All exterior concrete slabs shall have weakened plane joints at a maximum of ten feet intervals each way. 2. All slabs shall have a minimum sand or approved rock base cushion of not less than four inches in thickness placed immediately below the slab." Exception: Sidewalks and surfaces required under Section 1503.7 - Splash Protection." Section 15.08.020 - Fire protection systems. Fire protection systems must comply with the requirements specified in Chapter 15.28 of this title. To the extent there is any conflict between the provisions of Chapter 15.28 of this title and the provisions of Chapter 9 of the 2016 California Building Standards Code, the provisions of Chapter 15.28 of this title shall govern. Section 15.08.030 - Appendix Chapters Added. Appendix Chapter I, Patio Covers and Appendix Chapter J, Grading shall be considered as part of the body of the code as adopted in Section 15.08.010." Page 10 Ord. 902 SECTION 4. Chapter 15. 10, "Residential Code" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed. SECTION 5. Chapter 15.12, "Residential Code" is added to the Rohnert Park Municipal Code as follows: "Chapter 15.12 - Residential Code Section 15.12.0 10 - Adopted - 2016 California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 2.5, "California Residential Code." The 2016 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2.5, incorporating the International Residential Code, 2015 edition, published by the International Code Council, one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official, is adopted by reference, subject to the following additions and amendments to certain sections thereof which shall read and provide as set forth in this Chapter. When there is a conflict with or omission of the provisions of the Division II - Administration and that of Section 15.04 of this title, the provisions of Section 15.04 of this title shall govern. Section R313.2 - Amended - One- and two-family dwellings automatic fire systems. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and maintained in all newly constructed one and two family dwellings and accessory structures thereto, including U and S occupancies. Exceptions: 1. Detached Group U occupancies 1000 sq. ft. or less in floor area. 2. Detached pool houses 1000 sq. ft. or less in floor area within 50 feet of the pool and limited to a single bathroom. Section R313.2.1 - Added - Additions and alterations. Sprinkler systems shall be installed as required when California Fire Code, Section 903.3.21 and Chapter 15.28 of this title are exceeded. Section R313.2.2 - Added - Design and Installation. Automatic residential fire sprinkler systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with Section R313 or NFPA 13D. Section 15.12.020 - Appendix Chapters Added. Page 11 Ord. 902 Appendix Chapter H, Patio Covers and Appendix Chapter J, Existing Buildings and Structures and V, Swimming Pool Safety Act shall be considered as part of the body of the code as adopted in Section 15.12.010." SECTION 6. Chapter 15.16, "Electrical Code" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed and replaced with the following: "Chapter 15.16 - Electrical Code Section 15.16.010 — Adopted - 2016 California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 3, "California Electrical Code". The 2016 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 3, incorporating the "National Electrical Code," 2014 Edition, published by the National Fire Protection Association, one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official, is adopted by reference, subject to the following additions and amendments to certain sections thereof which shall read and provide as set forth in this Chapter. Sections 230.79(C) - Amended - One- or Two -Family Dwelling. For a one -family dwelling or two-family dwellings, the service disconnecting means shall have a rating of not less than 100 amperes, with an enclosure and bus bar rating of not less than 200 amperes, 3 -wire. The service disconnecting means, enclosure, and bus bar combination may require upgrades when any of the following requirements are exceeded: 1. When any other permit is applied for and the existing main service enclosure was manufactured by Federal Pacific or Zinsco. 2. When Five (5) or more circuits are modified. 3. When any secondary power source is added. 4. When an addition increases the existing gross floor area by 50% or more. 5. When a remodel, alteration or repair to an existing building includes demolition, removal or repair of more than 50% of the structure (including walls, columns, beams or girders, floor or ceiling joists and coverings, roof rafters, roof diaphragms, foundations or similar components). For the purpose of applying this section, the following criteria shall be considered in the 50% threshold evaluation: Page 12 Ord. 902 a. The removal or demolition of more than 50% of the exterior or interior load bearing walls. b. Removal of the roof structure or ceiling thereby permitting installation of new circuits. Note: The rating requirements of the bus bar and enclosure for the service disconnecting means do not require the main service entrance conductors to be upgraded as long as the main service disconnect is rated to match the rating and sizing of the existing main service entrance conductors. Section 15.16.020 - Added - Article 91 - Administration and Enforcement. Annex H - Administration and Enforcement, excepting articles 80.15 and 80.27, of the Appendix to the California Electrical Code is adopted. Annex H is retitled as Article 91 - Administration and Enforcement. When there is a conflict with or omission of the provisions of this section and that of Section 15.04 of this title, the provisions of Section 15.04 of this title shall govern." SECTION 7. Chapter 15.18, "Mechanical Code" is added to the Rohnert Park Municipal Code as follows: "Chapter 15.18 - Mechanical Code Section 5.18.010 - Adopted - 2016 California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 4, "California Mechanical Code". The 2016 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 4, incorporating the "Uniform Mechanical Code," 2015 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official, is adopted by reference. When there is a conflict with or omission of the provisions of the Division II - Administration and that of Section 15.04 of this title, the provisions of Section 15.04 of this title shall govern." SECTION 8. Chapter 15.20, "Plumbing Code" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed and replaced with the following: Page 13 Ord. 902 "Chapter 15.20 - Plumbing Code Section 15.20.010 - Adopted - California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 5, "California Plumbing Code". The 2016 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 5, incorporating the "Uniform Plumbing Code," 2012 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official, is adopted by reference. When there is a conflict with or omission of the provisions of the Division II - Administration and that of Section 15.04 of this title, the provisions of Section 15.04 of this title shall govern. Sections 301.2.6 - Added - Water supply materials All underground service supply lines shall be of non-metallic material consisting of either polyethylene, minimum class 160, Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC), minimum schedule 40, PEX or PEX-AL-PEX. Metallic materials may be used when suitable protection, approved by the building official, is provided. Section 604.1 - Amended - Pipe, Tube, and Fittings. Material for building water piping shall comply with the applicable standard referenced in Table 604.1. All underground service supply lines shall be of non-metallic material consisting of either polyethylene, minimum class 160, Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC), minimum schedule 40, PEX or PEX-AL-PEX. Metallic materials may be used when suitable protection, approved by the building official, is provided. Section 15.20.020 - Added - Appendix Chapters. Appendix Chapter A, Sizing Water Supply, Appendix Chapter B, Explanatory Notes on Combination Waste & Vent Systems, Appendix Chapter D, Sizing Storm - Water Systems and Appendix Chapter I, Installation Standards, of the Appendix to the 2016 California Plumbing Code shall be considered as part of the incorporation of the code as referenced in Section 15.20.010." SECTION 9. Chapter 15.22, "Energy Code" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed and replaced with the following: "Chapter 15.22 - Energy Code Page 14 Ord. 902 Section 15.22.010 - Adopted - California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 6, "California Energy Code". The 2016 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6, published by the California Building Standards Commission, one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official, is adopted by reference." SECTION 10. Chapter 15.24, "Mechanical Code." of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed. SECTION 11. Chapter 15.24, " Existing Building Code." is added to the Rohnert Park Municipal Code as follows: "Chapter 15.24 - Existing Building Code 15.24.010 - Adopted - California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 10, "California Existing Building Code". The 2016 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 10, published by the California Building Standards Commission, one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official, is adopted by reference. " SECTION 12. Chapter 15.26, "Green Building Code" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed and replaced with the following: "Chapter 15.26 - Green Building Standards Code Section 15.26.010 - Adopted - California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 11, "Green Building Standards Code" or "CALGreen". The 2016 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11, published by the California Building Standards Commission, including Appendix Chapter A4, Residential Voluntary Measures at Tier I level for New Residential Construction except Division A4.2 Energy Efficiency and Appendix Chapter A5, Nonresidential Voluntary Measures at Tier I level for New Non -Residential Construction except Division A5.2 Energy Efficiency, one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official, is adopted by reference." SECTION 13. Chapter 15.28 "Fire Code" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed and replaced with the following: Page 15 Ord. 902 "Chapter 15.28 - Fire Code Section 15.28.0 10 - Penalties for violations. Any violation of this Chapter is a misdemeanor. Each day a violation of Chapter 15.28 of this Title exists constitutes a separate offense. Section 15.28.020 - Adopted - "2016 California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 9, "California Fire Code". The 2016 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 9, incorporating the International Fire Code, 2015 Edition, published by the International Code Council, one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official, is adopted by reference, subject to the following additions and amendments to certain sections thereof which shall read and provide as set forth in this Chapter. Section 101.6 - Added - Applicable standards. Where no applicable standards or requirements are set out in Chapter 15.28 of this Title, or contained within other laws, codes, regulations, ordinances or rules adopted by the City or its officials, compliance with applicable standards of the National Fire Protection Association or other nationally recognized fire safety standards or other recognized good engineering practices, as approved by the fire code official shall constitute compliance with Chapter 15.28 of this Title. Nothing herein shall derogate from the power of the fire code official to determine compliance with codes or standards for those activities or installations within the fire code official's jurisdiction or responsibility. Section 103. 1.1 - Added - Fire code official. Whenever the term "fire code official" is used in Chapter 15.28 of this Title, it shall mean the Fire Marshal or his/her designee. Section 104.3 - Amended - Right of entry. A. The fire code official in the performance of duties prescribed in Chapter 15.28 of this Title, may enter upon and into any and all premises under his/her jurisdiction, at all reasonable hours for the purpose of inspecting the same to determine whether or not the provisions of Chapter 15.28 of this Title and all applicable laws or ordinances pertaining to the protection of persons and property from fire, explosion or exposure to hazardous materials are observed. However, an inspection warrant must be secured where entry is refused, except in an emergency situation. No Page 16 Ord. 902 owner, occupant or any other person having charge, care or control of any building or premises shall fail or neglect, after proper request is made and consent given, or an inspection warrant is obtained, to promptly permit the fire code official's entry for the purpose of inspection and examination. B. The fire code official may enter any building or premises to extinguish or control any fire, perform rescue operations, investigate the existence of suspected or reported fires, gas leaks or other hazardous conditions or take any other action necessary in the reasonable performance of his/her duties. Section 104.11.4 - Added - Emergency response penalty. In the event that the fire code official responds to any emergency caused by failure to comply with Chapter 15.28 of this Title and within the responsibility for enforcement of the fire code official as given in Section 104.11 of the California Fire Code, the person who caused the emergency will pay a penalty. The penalty shall constitute a debt of such person to the City and shall be collectable by the fire code official. Penalties shall be based on the current Rohnert Park Fire Division Fee Schedule as established or amended by City Council resolution. Section 105. 1.1 - Added - Additional required fire permits. The Director of Public Safety or the fire code official may require additional prescribed operational and construction permits as identified in the Fire Division Fee Schedule. Permit fees shall be based on the current Rohnert Park Fire Division Fee Schedule as established or amended by City Council resolution. Section 105.2.5 - Added - Fees. All applications for a permit required by Chapter 15.28 of this Title shall be made to the Fire Division of the Department of Public Safety or Building Department in the form and detail, including any required plans, required by the City of Rohnert Park Fire Division. The City Council may establish fees, by resolution, for permit applications. Section 108 - Amended - Appeals process. Whenever the Fire Prevention Division denies an application or permit, the applicant may appeal in writing the decision of the fire code official to the Director of Public Safety within 15 days. The Director shall review the written appeal and render a decision within 30 days of its receipt. The decision of the Director shall be final. Page 17 Ord. 902 Section 202 - Added - ALARM. A signal from a residence or business location in the City of Rohnert Park which ends at the City Department of Public Safety offices, or at a central alarm company's office which in turn relays it to the Department of Public Safety offices and which causes City personnel to respond, or through any other means that result in Department of Public Safety personnel responding to the signal. Section 202 - Added - EMERGENCY. An incident which requires a response by Department of Public Safety personnel. A response due to a failure, malfunction or other error, whether human or mechanical, which results in the transmission of an alarm to the Department of Public Safety is not an emergency. In the event that a question arises as to whether a response by City personnel was a response to an emergency as defined herein, the fire code official shall determine whether an incident constituted an emergency and his or her decision is final. Section 202 - Amended - FALSE ALARM. Added after the first paragraph as follows: Or An alarm to which City personnel or equipment have responded because of a report that an emergency existed and which did not require a response because the incident for which the alarm was given did not occur. Section 320 - Added - COMBUSTIBLE VEGETATION Section 320.1 - Added - Defensible space and neighboring property. Persons owning, leasing, or controlling property within areas requiring defensible space are responsible for maintaining a defensible space on the property owned, leased or controlled by said person, within a distance of not less than 30 feet from any neighboring building or structure. Distances may be modified by the fire code official because of a site-specific analysis based on local conditions. Section 505.1 - Amended - Address numbers. New and existing buildings shall have approved illuminated address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. Where access is by means of a private road and the building Page 18 Ord. 902 cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole, or other approved sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. The numbers shall contrast with their background. Address numbers shall be Arabic numerals or alphabet letters. Size and location of the Address Numbers shall be approved by the fire code official. Section 505. 1.1 - Added - One- and two-family dwellings. Address numbers for one and two family dwellings shall be a minimum of 4 inches in height with a minimum stroke width of one half (0.5) inches. Section 505.1.2 - Added - Numbers for other than one- and two-family dwellings. Each address identification character shall be not less than twelve (12) inches high with a minimum stroke of one inch. Suite and unit numbers shall not be less than six (6) inches high with a minimum stroke of three- quarters (0.75) inch or as approved by the fire code official. Section 505.1.3 - Added - Complex directory. Where two or more buildings cannot be viewed from the public way or when determined by the fire code official, an illuminated complex directory, monument, pole or other approved sign or means shall be used to identify the structures at the main entrances to the property. Section 507.5.1 -Amended - Fire hydrant and fire main required locations. Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 150 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and fire mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. Section 901.6.1.1 - Added - False fire alarm. The expenses incurred as a result of responding to a false alarm, as defined herein, shall be reimbursed if the number of responses exceeds an annual amount or consecutive period, as prescribed in the current Rohnert Park Fire Division Fee Schedule as established or amended by City Council resolution. Section 901.6.1.2 - Added - New alarm installations. In the case of new alarm installations, there will be a thirty day grace period in which responses will not be monitored for purposes of enforcement under this Chapter. Page 19 Ord. 902 Section 901.6.1.3 - Added - Commercial alarm responsibility. In determining responsibility for commercial alarms, the persons who contract with the alarm company for service, or the lessee or occupant of the structure which has installed and maintains said alarm shall be ultimately responsible for that alarm system. Section 901.6.1.4 - Added - Residential alarm responsibility. Responsibility for the alarm system in multi -family residential dwellings and condominiums shall rest with the persons who contracts with the alarm company for service to the system. Section 901.7 - Added - Out of service fire protection systems. Added after the second paragraph as follows: When a system is deemed out of service, the operator shall immediately provide current insurance documents and insurer's contact information to the fire code official. The operator or impairment coordinator shall also be responsible for contacting the insurer to inform them of changes in operation of the fire protection system. Section 903.2 - Amended - Automatic sprinkler system. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and maintained in all newly constructed buildings. Exceptions: 1. Detached Group U occupancies 1000 sq. ft. or less, as approved by the fire code official. 2. Detached pool houses up to 1000 sq. ft. in floor area within 50 feet of the pool and limited to a single bathroom. 3. Detached non-combustible motor vehicle fuel dispensing canopies classified as a Group M occupancy. 4. Detached Group B or M occupancies 500 sq. ft or less. Section 903.2.20 - Added - Changes of occupancy. When the fire code official determines, based on life and fire risk, that a proposed use or occupancy classification is more hazardous than an existing use or occupancy classification, including the conversion of residential buildings to condominiums, then no change of use or occupancy shall be made unless such structure is made to comply with the requirements for a Page 20 Ord. 902 newly constructed building. Section 903.2.21 - Added - Additions, remodels, alterations or repairs. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided as follows: 1. In an existing one- or two-family dwelling when an addition increases the existing gross floor area by 50% or more. 2. In an existing non-residential building when an addition increase the existing gross floor area by 25%. 3. Additions to existing Residential Group R-1 occupancies that result in additional guest rooms or dwelling units, the building shall meet the requirements for a newly constructed building. 4. When a remodel, alteration or repair to an existing building includes demolition, removal or repair of more than 50% of the structure (including walls, columns, beams or girders, floor or ceiling joists and coverings, roof rafters, roof diaphragms, foundations or similar components). For the purpose of applying this section, the following criteria shall be considered in the 50% threshold evaluation: a. The removal or demolition of more than 50% of the exterior or interior load bearing walls. Or, b. Removal of the roof structure or ceiling thereby permitting installation of overhead piping. Or, c. Removal of interior tenant improvements reducing the building to a "shell" condition shall require the future build -out to comply with fire sprinkler requirements. Exception: Alterations or additions made solely for the purpose of complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act. 5. Any combination of items above where the improvements equal or exceed fifty percent (50%) of the structure, the entire building shall meet the requirements for a newly constructed building. Note: The percentage of work shall be determined and added to any successive remodels that may occur within a subsequent three (3) year period. If the combined percentage totals 50% or more, this work shall constitute a substantial improvement and the building shall be subject to the fire sprinkler requirement. Page 21 Ord. 902 Section 903.3.1 - Amended - Design criteria. Fire sprinkler systems installed in buildings of undetermined use shall be designed and installed to have a design density of 0.33 gallons per minute per square foot over a minimum design area of 3,000 square feet. Where a subsequent occupancy change requires a system with greater capacity, it shall be the building owners' responsibility to upgrade the system to the required density and meet any additional requirements of Chapter 15.28 of this Title at the time of such change. Section 903.3.1.1 - Added - Installation requirements. Added after the first line as follows: NFPA 13 sprinkler systems shall be required. NFPA 13D sprinkler systems as amended in Chapter 80 may be substituted for NFPA 13 when approved by the fire code official, and as adopted by City standards. Section 903.3.1.1.1 - Exempt locations, is deleted in its entirety. Section 903.3.1.2 — NFPA 13R sprinkler systems, is deleted in its entirety. Section 903.4 - Amended - Sprinkler system monitoring and alarms. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, all valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems, and associated pumps, tanks, water levels and water flow switches shall be electronically supervised. Valves when used for standpipes are excluded from this provision unless required by the fire code official. Section 903.4.1 - Amended - Monitoring. Alarm, supervisory, and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote supervising station or proprietary supervising station as defined in NFPA 72, or when approved by the fire code official, shall sound an audible alarm at a constantly attended location. Section 903.4.2.1 - Added - Alarms notification. Every new fire alarm system installed for the purpose of notification, including those systems activated solely by fire sprinkler systems, shall be designed so that all occupants of the building shall be notified audibly and visually for each separate occupancy or each separate residential dwelling unit. Page 22 Ord. 902 Section 907.2 - Amended - Required fire alarm installations. An approved fire alarm system installed in accordance with the provisions of this code and NFPA 72 shall be provided as follows: A. All newly constructed commercial buildings shall be provided with a complete manual and automatic fire alarm system approved by the fire code official which when activated will sound an alarm which is audible throughout the building and will notify all occupants. B. In any commercial occupancy where a use creates a change of occupancy classification as listed in the California Building Code, the entire structure shall be provided with a fire alarm system approved by the fire code official. C. An exterior horn / strobe alarm device is required to be installed in all buildings with fire sprinkler systems located on the street frontage side, official. The horn / strobe alarm shall be or as approved by the fire code Section 907.2.9 - Amended - Manual fire alarm systems. Exceptions: 2.2. The notification devices installed in the common areas serving the residential units shall operate upon sprinkler water flow or manual pull station activation. Appendix B, Section B 105.1 - Amended - One- and two- family dwellings. The minimum fire flow requirements for one and two family dwellings having a fire -flow calculation area which does not exceed 3,600 square feet shall be 1,500 gallons per minute at 20 psi. Fire flow and flow duration for dwellings having a fire flow calculation area in excess of 3,600 square feet shall not be less than that specified in Table B 105.1. Appendix B, Section B 105.2 - Amended - Buildings other than one- and two-family dwellings. The minimum fire flow and flow duration for buildings other than one and two family dwellings shall be as specified in Table B 105.1 of the California Fire Code. Exception: A reduction in required fire flow of up to 50 percent is allowed when the building is provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with other sections of Chapter 15.28 of this Title. The resulting fire flow shall not be less than 1,500 gallons per minute for the prescribed duration as specified in Table B 105.1. Page 23 Ord. 902 Appendix B, Table B 105.2, Footnote A, is deleted in its entirety. Appendix C, Table C102.1 - Amended - Footnotes f and g. Footnotes f and g are deleted and replaced as follows: Table C102.1, Footnote f: For commercial, industrial and multifamily residential buildings, average spacing shall be no greater than 300 feet. Appendix D, Section D103.2 - Amended - Grade. The grade of fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with City standards or as approved by the fire code official. Appendix D, Section D 103.3 - Amended - Turning radius. The minimum turning radius shall be in accordance with City standards or as approved by the fire code official. Appendix D, Section D103.4 - Amended - Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45,720 mm) shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with City standards. Appendix D, Section D103.6 - Amended - Signs. Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING -FIRE LANE signs complying with the California Vehicle Code. Appendix D, Section D106.1 - Amended - Projects having more than 50 dwelling units. Multiple -family residential projects having more than 50 dwelling units shall be provided with two separate and approved fire access roads. Appendix D, Section D 106.2, is deleted in its entirety. Section 5601.1.1.3(5) - Added - Manufacturing. The manufacturing of fireworks is prohibited except under special permits as required by local, county, or state regulations. Section 5602.1 - Added - Definitions. Page 24 Ord. 902 The following words and phrases, as used in this Chapter with regard to the sale of fireworks, are defined as follows: AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS: Organizations incorporated under the same charter or organization and their auxiliaries if the auxiliary is incorporated under the same charter; 2. Organizations sharing the same officers and/or place of meetings and/or national parent organization; 3. Subdivisions and/or fractional divisions, however named or delineated, of organizations; 4. Sub -organizations, one of whose primary purposes is to provide financial and/or staffing support to a parent non-profit organization. DANGEROUS FIREWORKS: Dangerous fireworks as defined in Health and Safety Code Sections 12505 and 12561 and the relevant sections of Title 19, Code of Regulations, Subchapter 6 which are hereby incorporated by reference. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION: Any non-profit association, charity or corporation or a group which is an integral part of a recognized national organization having such tax-exempt status or an organization affiliated with and officially recognized by an elementary, junior high and/or high school and/or school district that serves, in whole or in part, the residents of the City of Rohnert Park or public and/or private community college, college and/or university which is located within the boundaries of the City of Rohnert Park. PERSON: Any individual, firm, partnership, joint venture, association, concern, corporation, state, trust, business trust, receiver, syndicate or any other group or combination acting as a unit. PRINCIPAL AND PERMANENT MEETING PLACE: Includes, but not be limited to, a permanent structure, playing field, or geographic area that services a population which resides in or is located within the City of Rohnert Park. PUBLIC DISPLAY OF FIREWORKS: An entertainment feature where the public is admitted or permitted to view the display or discharge of fireworks. PYROTECHNICAL DISPLAYS: Public firework displays or displays used in conjunction with special effects, for motion pictures, theatrical and group entertainment productions operated by a professional California State Page 25 Ord. 902 licensed pyrotechnician. All such displays must secure a fire department permit and meet all applicable requirements of California Health and Safety Code. "State -approved fireworks" shall mean state -approved fireworks defined in Health and Safety Code Sections 12529 and 12562 and the relevant sections of Title 19, Code of Regulations, Subchapter 6, which are hereby incorporated by reference. State -approved fireworks are commonly referred to as safe and sane fireworks. Throughout the remainder of this document the term state -approved fireworks will be used to denote safe and sane fireworks. Section 5614.1 - Added - Sales. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell state -approved fireworks within the City of Rohnert Park without having obtained a City of Rohnert Park Fire permit. Section 5614.2 - Added - General prohibition against possession, sale or use of fireworks. Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, no person shall possess, sell, use, display or explode any rocket, including but not limited to, Piccolo Petes, firecrackers, roman candles, squibs, torpedoes, torpedo canes, wire core sparklers, wooden core sparklers, black cartridges or other combustible devices or explosive substances or any kind of fireworks, by whatsoever name known, within the City of Rohnert Park. Section 5614.3 - Added - Authorized sale of state -approved fireworks. It is unlawful to sell state -approved fireworks within the City of Rohnert Park at any time other than the following: Between eight a.m. on the thirtieth of June and ending at nine p.m. on July 4th of the same year. Section 5614.4 - Added - Authorized use of state -approved fireworks. The use of state -approved fireworks may occur beginning on the thirtieth of June and ending on the fourth of July between the hours of eight a.m. and ten -thirty p.m. Section 5614.5 - Added - Prerequisite for issuance of permit. A. No permit to sell state -approved fireworks shall be issued to any person. This prohibition excludes non-profit organizations as defined in Section 15.28.5602.1. B. Each such non-profit organization shall have its principal and permanent meeting place within the City of Rohnert Park limits. Page 26 Ord. 902 C. No non-profit organization shall submit more than one application for a permit to sell state -approved fireworks within the City of Rohnert Park. If more than one application is submitted on behalf of any non-profit organization, including an affiliated organization, all such requests shall be void. The fire code official will determine whether organizations or groups are affiliated. Any attempt to transfer an application shall void any and all applications filed by or on behalf of both the transferor/non- profit organization and the transferee/non-profit organization. D. Clean-up deposit. Each non-profit organization shall post a two hundred dollar ($200.00) clean-up deposit with the application to sell state - approved fireworks within the City of Rohnert Park. The deposit will be forfeited to the City in the event the permittee fails to remove rubbish from the designated clean-up area by five p.m. on July fifth. The clean- up area will be assigned by the Fire Department upon receipt and approval of the application by the non-profit organization. The clean-up areas are the designated parks and City -owned parking lots within the City of Rohnert Park. The Director of Public Works or his/her designee will check the clean-up site and then report their findings to the Fire Department. The Fire Department will make the final determination if the deposit will be refunded. Section 5614.6 - Added - Application for permit. A. All applications for permits to sell state -approved fireworks shall be in writing to the fire code official. Applications may be filed beginning the first day of April of each year up to and through the end of the work day of the last day of May of the same year, at which time the filing period for that year will be closed. Applications shall set forth the proposed location of the fireworks stand being applied for, and other information as may be required by the fire code official. B. Applications shall include: A written assurance that, if the permit is issued to the applicant, the applicant shall, at the time of receipt of such a permit, deliver to the fire code official liability insurance in the amount required by the City. 2. A copy of the requisite State retail sales permit from the Office of the California State Fire Marshal. A statement of the zoning of the real property on which the fireworks stand is to be located. 4. A non-refundable application fee in the amount established by resolution of the City Council. This application fee shall be in Page 27 Ord. 902 addition to any fee or tax imposed by Chapter 15.28 of this Title or by City Council resolution. The proposed location of the fireworks stand, the name, address and telephone number of one or more responsible adults who will be in charge of and responsible for the fireworks stand during the period that state -approved fireworks are sold, displayed or stored at such location, and written permission from the owner of record of the property upon which the stand will be located. 6. The proposed location of night storage of the fireworks. Documented evidence, either in the form of a certificate or other similar documentation, that a representative from the non-profit organization attended a state -approved fireworks stand operator safety seminar conducted by the Fire Department and/or the licensed fireworks wholesaler that is supplying the state -approved fireworks to the non-profit organization. C. Applicants for such permits shall be notified by June 22 of each calendar year by the fire code official of the approval or disapproval of such applications for such permit. All organizations whose applications have been approved shall receive their permit at the time their fireworks booth passes a required fire inspection. Section 5614.7 - Added - Denial of application. A. The fire code official shall issue the permit to sell state -approved fireworks unless he or she finds that: 5. The applicant has failed to provide sufficient plans, information or other data necessary to render a determination respecting compliance with the requirements of Chapter 15.28 of this Title; or 6. The applicant is not in compliance with any of the requirements of Chapter 15.28 of this Title; or 7. The applicant has failed to pay any and all fees and costs required to operate a fireworks stand in the City of Rohnert Park. B. Any denial of a permit pursuant to this section may be appealed pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 15.28 of this Title. Section 5614.8 - Added - Operation of fireworks stand. Page 28 Ord. 902 A. No person shall knowingly sell fireworks to any person under the age of eighteen. B. Proof that the fireworks stand operator/organization demanded, was shown, and acted in reliance upon bona fide evidence of age and identity in any sale of fireworks forbidden by this Chapter shall be a defense in any proceedings for suspension or revocation of its state -approved fireworks permit or any criminal proceedings for violations of this Chapter. For purposes of this section, bona fide evidence of age and identity of purchaser is a document issued by a federal, state, county or municipal government which contains a photograph of the purchaser including, but not limited to, a valid California Driver's License or Identification Card issued to a member of the armed forces. C. The sale of state -approved fireworks shall begin no earlier than eight a.m. on June thirtieth and shall not continue after nine p.m. on July fourth of the same year. No person under the age of eighteen shall sell or participate in the sale of state -approved fireworks at such stand. No person under the age of eighteen shall be permitted inside the stand during hours of operation. D. No person other than the permitted nonprofit organization(s) shall operate the stand for which the permit is issued or share or otherwise participate in the profits of the operation of such stand. Section 5614.9 - Added - Temporary fireworks stand. All retail sales of state -approved fireworks shall be permitted from within a temporary fireworks stand, and retail sales from any other building or structure is hereby prohibited. Temporary stands shall be subject to the following provisions: No fireworks stand shall be located within twenty-five feet of any other building or within one hundred feet of any gasoline pump, distribution point of flammable liquid, or flammable/combustible liquid storage. Location of stands is contingent upon approval of the location in writing by the fire code official or his/her designee. Fireworks stands need not comply with the provisions of the Building Code of the City of Rohnert Park. However, all stands shall be erected under the supervision of the fire code official who shall require that the firework stands be constructed in a manner which will reasonably ensure the safety of attendants and patrons. No stand shall have a floor area in excess of three hundred fifty square feet. Each stand shall have at least two exits. Each stand in excess of forty feet in length shall have at least three exits spaced approximately equidistant apart. However, in no case shall the distance between the exits exceed twenty-four feet. Exit doors shall be not less than twenty-four inches wide Page 29 Ord. 902 and six feet in height and shall swing in the direction of exit travel. Each stand shall be provided with one 2AIOBC fire extinguisher, in good working order and easily accessible for use in case of fire. All retail sales of state -approved fireworks shall be permitted only from within a temporary stand. Sales from any other building or structure are hereby prohibited. Section 5614.10 - Added - General fireworks stand requirements for permittees. All weeds and combustible materials shall be cleared from the location of the fireworks stand to a distance of at least twenty-five feet surrounding the fireworks stand. All trash resulting from the operation of the fireworks stand must be removed on a daily basis in accordance with Section 15.28.5614.5(D). "NO SMOKING" signs shall be prominently displayed on and in the state approved fireworks stand. Additional signs shall be posted in a conspicuous location, on the stand, that identifies the required minimum age of persons purchasing fireworks; locations where fireworks are illegal; and restricting the discharge of fireworks near stands. Each state -approved fireworks stand must have an adult in attendance and in charge thereof while fireworks are stored therein. Sleeping or remaining in the stand after close of business each day is forbidden. All unsold stock shall be removed from the stand and located in an approved storage area immediately after close of business on each day of operation. In addition, all unsold stock of fireworks in the hands of the permittee after nine p.m. on the 4th day of July shall be returned to the wholesaler/distributor within twenty-four hours and removed from the City of Rohnert Park within ten days. On closing of the state -approved fireworks stand, all litter shall be removed from the premises. Each state -approved fireworks stand must have available in an accessible place inside the stand its permit to sell state -approved fireworks, its State Fire Marshal Retail Sales Permit and proof of its required insurance. No person shall smoke within twenty-five feet of the state -approved fireworks stand. No person shall light or cause to be lit or permit to be lit any state -approved fireworks or combustible material within fifty feet of any state -approved fireworks stand. Section 5614.11 - Added - Supervision of minors. It shall be unlawful for any person having the care, custody or control of a Page 30 Ord. 902 minor (under eighteen years old) to permit such minor to discharge, explode, fire or set off any dangerous, illegal fireworks, at any time, or to permit such minor to discharge or set off any state -approved fireworks unless such minor does so under the direct supervision of a person over eighteen years of age and during the time period permitted by this Chapter. Section 5614.12 - Added - Transportation of state -approved fireworks. Wholesalers of fireworks must obtain a permit to deliver fireworks into the City in accordance with provisions of the California Health and Safety Code. No deliveries may be made on or after July 4 of each year. Section 5614.13 - Added - Revocation of Permit -Appeal. The fire code official may revoke the permit of any permittee who violates any of the provisions of this Chapter. Such revocation shall not occur prior to (1) the permittee being notified of the alleged violation and provided an opportunity to request a hearing; and (2) a hearing taking place before the City Manager, if requested by the permittee. If the revocation occurs between June 22nd and July fourth, the fire code official shall inform the permittee that the permittee may seek review of the fire code official's decision by the City Manager on the next business day. At the earliest opportunity on the next business day after the revocation, the fire code official shall provide the City Manager with written notice of the permittee's alleged violation, including the name of the permittee and a brief statement of the grounds for potential revocation. The City Manager shall meet with the permittee and the fire code official on that day, upon the permittee's request, to review the fire code official's decision. The decision of the City Manager shall be final." Chapter 80, NFPAI3D, Section 5.1.1.2 - Added - Spare sprinkler heads. A supply of at least three sprinklers shall be maintained on the premises so that any sprinklers that have operated or been damaged in any way can be promptly replaced. Chapter 80, NFPAI3D, Section 8.3.4.1 - Added - Location of sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be required in enclosed attached garages and a minimum of a single head in attics, near the attic access hatch. Section 15.28.030 - Adopted - Appendix Chapters. A through N of the Appendix to the California Fire Code shall be considered as part of the incorporation of the code as referenced in Section 15.28.020." Page 31 Ord. 902 SECTION 14. Chapter 15.30, "Administrative Citations For Fireworks" of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed and replaced with the following: "Chapter 15.30 - Administrative Citations for Fireworks Section 15.30.010 - Purpose and scope. A. This chapter provides for the imposition, enforcement, collection, and administrative review of all administrative fines, related to: (1) the possession, use, storage, sale and/or display of those fireworks classified as "dangerous fireworks" in California Health and Safety Code Sections 12500 et seq., with the exception of a pyrotechnic licensee when operating pursuant to that license; and (2) the sale, use, and/or display of "safe and sane fireworks" as defined in California Health and Safety Code Sections 12500 et seq. on or at dates, times and/or locations other than those permitted by the Chapter 15.28 of this Title. B. The issuance of citations imposing administrative fines may be performed at the discretion of the officials of the city authorized hereunder; and the issuance of a citation to any person constitutes but one remedy to redress violations of this Code by any person. By adopting this chapter, the city does not intend to limit its authority to employ any other remedy, civil or criminal, to redress any violation of this Code or state law by any person. C. The imposition of fines related to "dangerous fireworks" under this chapter shall be limited to persons who possess, sell, use and/or display, or the seizure of, twenty-five pounds or less (gross weight) of such dangerous fireworks. D. Fines collected pursuant to this chapter related to "dangerous fireworks" shall not be subject to Health and Safety Code Section 12706. However, the city shall provide cost reimbursement to the State Fire Marshal for the transportation and disposal of "dangerous fireworks" seized by the city where applicable. These costs will be included in any administrative fines imposed under this chapter. E. The definitions set forth in Chapter 15.28 of this Title are incorporated into this chapter. Section 15.30.020 - Enforcement. A. This chapter shall be enforced pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.25 of this Title. The amount of the administrative penalty for violations of this chapter and those sections of Chapter 15.28 pertaining to fireworks shall be governed by Section 15.30.030. B. The fire code official or his/her designee shall enforce the provisions of Chapter 15.30 and those sections of Chapter 15.28 of this Title pertaining to fireworks. Section 15.30.030 - Penalties for violations. Page 32 Ord. 902 A. In addition to the penalties provided for in Chapter 15.04 of this Title, each person who violates any provisions of this chapter and/or Chapter 15.28 of this Title as they relate to the possession, use, storage, sale, and/or display of "dangerous fireworks" shall be subject to the imposition and payment of an administrative fine of one thousand dollars per occurrence, a late charge of two hundred fifty dollars if the fine is not paid within thirty days of the date of citation, and all costs incurred by the office of the state fire marshal for the transportation and disposal of any dangerous fireworks seized from the person. The costs incurred by the office of the state fire marshal will be calculated based upon the regulations promulgated by that office. If those regulations have not been adopted by the office of the State Fire Marshal at the time a person is cited for possession of dangerous fireworks under this Code, the city will reserve twenty-five percent of any fine collected under this provision to cover the cost of reimbursement to the office of the state fire marshal. B. In addition to the penalties provided for in Section 15.04 of this Title, each person who sells, uses, and/or displays "safe and sane fireworks" on or at dates, times, and/or locations other than those permitted by Chapter 15.28 of this Title shall be subject to the imposition of payment of an administrative fine as provided below: Number of Offenses in One Year Amount of Administrative Penalty Late Charge Total Amount of penalty Plus Late Charge First $250.00 $ 75.00 500.00 150.00 $ 325.00 Second 650.00 Third 750.00 300.00 1,050.00 Section 15.30.040 - Additional violation. Causing, permitting, aiding, abetting, or concealing a violation of any provision of this chapter or Chapter 15.28 of this Title relating to fireworks shall also constitute a violation." SECTION 15. Chapter 15.36, "Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code", of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed. SECTION 16. SEVERABILITY Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. SECTION 17. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effective on January 1, 2017, no less than 30 days after its adoption, and shall be published or posted as required by law. Page 33 Ord. 902 This ordinance was introduced by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park on November 8, 2016 and DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this November 22, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Gina Belforte, Mayor ATTEST: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney Page 34 Ord. 902 N6RT Pp$k +� Mission Statement ,g sa "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a 000 Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." CAL1 F©RN7P CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November 22, 2016 Department: Administration Submitted By: Darrin Jenkins, City Manager Prepared By: Caitlin Saldanha, Deputy City Clerk ITEM NO. 6E Agenda Title: Approval of Cancellation of the Rohnert Park City Council Regular Meeting Scheduled for December 27, 2016 Due to the Holiday Season RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Minute Order, approve the cancellation of the Rohnert Park City Council Regular Meeting scheduled for December 27, 2016 due to the holiday season. BACKGROUND: The City Council has the authority to establish meeting dates and times as well as reschedule or cancel such meetings with proper and timely notice. The City Council Protocols outline the conditions for cancelling a regularly scheduled meeting as follows: Chapter I, Section F Cancellation of Regular Meetings "any meeting of the Council may be canceled in advance by a majority vote of the Council. " It should also be noted that the second regularly scheduled meeting in December is traditionally cancelled and has not taken place in recent years such as 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. If the City Council decides to cancel the regular meeting on December 27, 2016, then required posting and noticing of the cancelled meeting will be handled by City Clerk's Office staff. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: 1. Recommended Option: Staff recommends cancelling the Rohnert Park City Council Regular Meeting scheduled for December 27, 2016 due to the holiday season. 2. Alternative: The City Council can maintain the current meeting schedule and hold the Rohnert Park City Council Regular Meeting on December 27, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: None. Department Head Approval Date: N/A Finance Director Approval Date: N/A City Attorney Approval Date: N/A City Manager Approval Date: 11/16/2016 Attachments: None Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NO. 6F Meeting Date: November 22, 2016 Department: Administration Submitted By: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk Prepared By: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk Agenda Title: City Council Confirmation of Mayor Belforte's Nomination of Paul Libeu for Appointment as the City's Representative to the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District for a Four -Year Term Expiring 12/31/2020 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Confirm the Mayor's nomination of Paul Libeu as the City's Representative to the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District (District) for a Four -Year Term Expiring 12/31/2020. BACKGROUND: Mr. Paul Libeu has served as Rohnert Park's representative to the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Board of Trustees since March 2005. He has requested reappointment to a 4 -year term. ANALYSIS: The City is a member of a number of joint powers authorities, governmental agencies, and advisory groups. The City selects representatives to serve on the boards of these agencies. Per the City Council Protocols (Protocols), the Mayor nominates and the Council confirms by majority vote of the membership appointments to outside agencies, committees, commissions, boards, and taskforces. As noted in the letter from the District attached, Council has the option of appointing Mr. Libeu to a two-year or a four-year appointment per California Health and Safety Code SB 1588 Section 2024(a). Mr. Libeu has requested a four-year term. This outside appointment requires City Council confirmation per the Protocols. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Involvement by representation with outside authorities, governmental agencies, and advisory groups supports the City's values of communication and collaboration. ITEM NO. 6F OPTIONS CONSIDERED: 1. Recommended Option: City Council confirm the Mayor's nomination of Paul Libeu for a four-year term expiring 12/31/2020 as the City's Representative to the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District. 2. Alternative: City Council could confirm the Mayor's nomination and appoint Paul Libeu to a two-year term expiring 12/31/2018 as the City's Representative to the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District however this option is not recommended based on Mr. Libeu desire to serve a four-year term. 3. Alternative: City Council can choose to not make an appointment however this options is not recommended because representation supports the City's values of communication and collaboration. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: None. Department Head Approval Date: NA Finance Director Approval Date: NA City Attorney Approval Date: NA City Manager Approval Date: 11/16/2016 Attachments (list in packet assembly order): 1. Completed Reappointment/Fact Sheet Form 2. Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District notification of expiring term 3. City Council Protocols Section IX, Outside Agency Appointments 2 ROHNERT PARK City of Rohnert Park 2017 y OCT Request for Reappointment 112016 .." CITY CLERK Name of Commission/committee/Board M CA nr� '+snr�ss �i � �� } t IleI +6V C"uk-�d I --Full Name CA 1A � ( LJ l " L— r J 1P_ LA_ Residence Address (Physical Address. not PO) _ Home Phone - — Cell Phone Email Employerr r;,p Employed Since - -- f l Jou Title/Position _ Work Phone 1 �'JNU41AC_ jCAoc kI`� Vec� o.VfiroI ()ISt' �l+rG�ri•7 � Please list community groups v,c Pry i dov .� cbaRW_ M.uSr5CQPA44f 144 a'-.1) or organizations you are affiliated with and list any offices held. Additional Comments MuuAhrAtAJ C60-JoWta4t-t C_.uN-(Vj" 0,MO T E'Gs a l•�z ISCAIC..4� AO 31 1 rY' [ a.fir v or .t to j me t-�Le,�-p 6z PZ1"�ms ke Ix�f. �,e � c ►{-f ]-0 4*'4-k , sJKV14-4 V-04pug -1 1 C -a I T 0VU � /U PL"' J4 t04 j All OV'A PO r6 -A 0 to a f r6 b 00�_ttr. tvDVj Is ry off` -fi( '�'j -N ato&v".� GtdK tb Lk Moroio�� a C, �(-).Rack- ` Ph/q PC,_ y [_ -F L- b�pj4 6c -'r j I W Name (Printed) Signatc,re Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794.9248 www.rocity.ora ��,�>sISOtv0 3 o ROHNERT PARD OUR 0" OCT 212016 595 Heiman Lane Cotati, CA 94931 October 17, 2016 CITY CLERK 1,800.231.3236 or 707.285.2200 707.285.2210 fax www.msmosquito.com Philip D. Smith Dear City Clerk: District Manager shall classify themselves by lot into two classes, as nearly equal as possible. The Rohnert Park The current term of Paul Libeu, the City of Rohnert Park representative to our BOARD OF TRUSTEES District's Board of Trustees, expires December 31, 2016. While it is no longer petah Petaluma Paul Sagues mandated that you appoint a representative to our Board {Health and Safety Code Lee Braun, President Belvedere SB 1588, Article 3, Section 2022 (d)}, it is the intent of the Legislature that Shaun McCaffery, Vice President persons appointed to Boards of Trustees have experience, training, and education Healdsburg in fields that will assist in the governance of the District. Herb Rowland, Jr., Secretary If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (707) 285-2200. Thank Novato Laurie Gallian, Treasurer The following information is sent to assist your elected officials in the Sonoma appointment process. California Health and Safety Code SB 1588 Yvonne Van Dyke Cotati Section 2022 (a) Each person appointed by a board of supervisors to be a Tamara Davis Sonoma County Atfarge member of a board of trustees shall be a voter in that county and a resident of Carol Giovanatto that portion of the county that is within the district. Cloverdale Martin Castro Section 2024 (a) The term of office for a member of the board of trustees shall be Windsor for a term of two (2) or four (4) years at the discretion of the appointing Arthur Deicke authority. Santa Rosa Una Glass Sebastopol Section 2023 (c) At the first meeting of the initial board of trustees, the trustees Paul Libeu shall classify themselves by lot into two classes, as nearly equal as possible. The Rohnert Park term of office of the class having the greater number shall expire at noon on the Steve Ayala first Monday in January that is closest to the second year from the appointments petah Petaluma Paul Sagues made pursuant to Section 2021. The term of office of the class having the lesser Ross number shall expire at noon on, the first Monday in January that is closest to the Terry Pebbles first year from the appointments made pursuant to Section 2021. Marin County At Large Ed Schulze Marin CountvAtLarge If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (707) 285-2200. Thank Nancy Barnard you for your prompt consideration of this matter. Corte Madera Laura Fennema Tiburon Sandra Ross Mill Valley Respectfully, Dawn Williams Administrative Assistant Frank Egger Fairfruv Pamela Harlem San Rafael 15. Any event resulting in substantial media coverage (e.g., discovery of improperly stored bodies by funeral home) 16. Any Public Safety event involving an elected official, City Manager, department head that comes to the attention of the Department of Public Safety 17. Activation of the City's Emergency Operations Center Requirements in existing law (e.g., juvenile information, notification of immediate family members) or the need to protect crime victims may restrict the ability to provide information. This policy is not intended to circumvent legal limits to law enforcement restricted information. In cases where incidents not requiring Council action occur during the hours of 9:00 p.m. through 8:00 a.m., Councilmembers will be contacted the next morning or shortly thereafter. VIII. LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS The Mayor assigns liaisons to various outside agencies, committees, commissions, boards, and taskforces. 1. Unless acting in an official liaison capacity, individual Councilmembers should refrain from attending meetings organized or chaired by City staff which are not open to the public. 2. Liaisons are obligated to keep Council well informed on activities pertaining to Rohnert Park via the Council Committee and Other Reports at Council meetings. 3. City staff may serve as a liaison with the concurrence of the City Manager. IX. OUTSIDE AGENCY APPOINTMENTS The Mayor nominates and the City Council confirms by majority vote of the membership appointments to outside agencies, committees, commissions, boards, and taskforces. 1. An appointee's role is to represent the City on matters affecting the City of Rohnert Park. Appointees have no authority to appropriate City funds except as otherwise approved by the City Council. 2. Appointees are obligated to keep Council well informed via Council meetings or City staff. 3. Appointees are expected to attend meetings on a regular and consistent basis. 4. Each appointees serves at the pleasure of the City Council. Any City Councilmember may bring forward a proposal to remove an appointee. Three affirmative votes of the City Council are required to remove an appointee. City Council Protocols Page 21 of 27 Amended 311012015 by Reso. No. 2015-047 1343373v1A 80078/0012 5. City staff may be appointed with the concurrence of the City Manager. X. COUNCIL COMMITTEES A. Purpose The City Council from time to time forms committees. These committees are formed to study, investigate, and make recommendations to the full Council regarding specific topics. In some instances these are standing committees and in other instances these are ad hoc committees. In order for the committees to serve effectively, it is necessary to establish certain policies for the conduct of City business by committees. B. Appointment Council committees will be appointed by the Mayor. Committee members will be promptly notified of their selection and the scope of the committee assignment. The Mayor will designate the term of the committee and identify whether it is a standing appointment (on-going) or a short-term (ad hoc) assignment. 1. Standing Committee is a committee that has a continuing subject matter jurisdiction or has a meeting schedule that is fixed by the Council. 2. Ad Hoc Committee is a committee that has a specific purpose and limited duration, does not have a continuing subject matter jurisdiction, and does not have a meeting schedule that is fixed by the Council. C. Conflict of Interest Should an appointee to a committee discover a conflict of interest with his/her appointment to the committee, that discovery will be communicated to the Mayor immediately. D. Committee Meetings Council committee meetings will be scheduled at times which allow for each member to attend. Each member should make an effort to accommodate the committee meeting schedule. The schedule of committee meetings will be promptly communicated to each committee member. Individual committee members will not meet with other citizens or organizations during a fact finding process or other reason associated with the scope of the committee's purpose without the knowledge of all committee members. E. Communications Committee members are obligated to keep all members well informed via the Council Committee and Other Reports at Council meetings, and will not purposely harbor or keep relevant information from other members. City Council Protocols Page 22 of 27 Amended 3/10/2015 by Reso. No. 2015-047 1343373v1A 80078/0012 Meeting Date: Department: Submitted By: Prepared By: Agenda Title: ITEM NO. 7 Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 22, 2016 Development Services Mary Grace Pawson, Director of Development Services Vanessa Marin, Senior Engineering Technician Discussion and Direction on Partnering with the County of Sonoma on Railroad Quiet Zones that Include the City of Rohnert Park RECOMMENDED ACTION: Direct staff to partner with the County of Sonoma on quiet zones that include the City of Rohnert Park and take follow up actions necessary to fund the effort. BACKGROUND: The Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) is currently testing its passenger rail service between Airport Boulevard in Sonoma County and Central San Rafael in Marin County. SMART anticipates beginning full passenger service in April 2017 with a tentative train -operating schedule that would result in approximately 30 trains per day running on the corridor. The earliest weekday train is estimated to arrive in Rohnert Park at approximately 5:30 A.M and latest train is estimated to leave Rohnert Park sometime around 9:30 PM (see Attachment 1). SMART is currently running approximately 30 trains per day in its testing mode but with a much less predictable schedule. The renewed active rail activity, including the use of train warning horns, has stimulated community interest in "quiet zones" along the proposed service route. While SMART representatives have been very clear that quiet zones will not be recognized during the testing phase for safety reasons, staff has been working to understand the process, issues and costs around establishing a quiet zone for Rohnert Park. Staff has been coordinating with the County of Sonoma (County) and the City of Cotati around this issue. On November 14, County staff requested that the City join its effort to establish a regional quiet zone. Quiet Zone Definition: Under the Federal Railroad Administration's (FRA) "Final Rule on Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway -Rail Grade Crossings" (the Train Horn Final Rule), train horns are required to sound at all highway grade crossings, including crossings of City streets and paths. The Train Horn Final Rule includes a provision for local jurisdictions to manage the use of train horns through the creation of "quiet zones." A quiet zone is a section of rail line, at least one-half mile in length that contains one or more consecutive public crossings within which blowing of train horns is prohibited except in certain circumstances. In "full quiet zones," horn prohibitions are in effect 24 -hours per day. In "partial quiet zones," horn prohibitions are in effect from 10 pm in evening until 7 am in the morning. Even in a designated quiet zone, the locomotive engineer must sound the train horn when entering and leaving the station and may sound the train horn to provide warning if he or she ITEM NO. 7 has determined such action is warranted for safety purposes. Federal regulations hold engineers personally liable for some types of accidents and engineers tend to err on the side of using warning horns. Because the Train Horn Final Rule is specific to train horns, quiet zone designations do not include any other railroad noises such as engine braking, engine noise, and grade crossing bells and lights. Federal Process for Establishing a Quiet Zone: The FRA has established that the absence of train horns adds to risk of accidents at grade crossings. Because of this, when a local agency wishes to establish a quiet zone, it must follow a federally regulated process that evaluates the risk of the proposed zone and identifies additional safety measures to counter balance the risk. Specifically, local agencies must take the following steps in the following order. 1. Identify the crossings to be included in the quiet zone. 2. Conduct a "diagnostic review" of the crossings with the Public Utilities Commission and other stakeholders to identify what supplemental safety measures (SSMs) can be installed to assist in meeting quiet zone requirements for reducing the risk of accidents in the quiet zone. 3. Provide a Notice of Intent (NOI) to all of the railroads that operate in the proposed quiet zone and state agencies responsible for pedestrian and highway safety. If local agencies are working together to establish a regional quiet zone, these agencies must document this working relationship with the NOI. In the City's case, the County is proposed to act as the "lead agency" and will submit an NOI. Cooperating agencies must submit letters of support with the single NOI. 4. Submit an alternate safety measure (ASM) application to the FRA if necessary. 5. Upon review and comment by the FRA, fund and construct the supplemental safety measures required by the FRA. 6. Once the supplemental safety measures are installed, submit a Notice of Quiet Zone Establishment to the California Public Utilities Commission, all railroads operating over the crossings within the quiet zone, and the Federal Railroad Administration. Other Quiet Zone Considerations: In addition to the federal process requirements, staff is working to understand the local conditions that might impact quiets zones. These include: • Inter -agency cooperation around quiet zones; • The impacts of the current "testing schedule" versus the proposed operational schedule on horn use; and • The required agreement with SMART, particularly the indemnity provisions. ANALYSIS: In considering the designation of a quiet zone, the City needs to balance the potential to mitigate noise impacts with the impacts to public safety, the increased exposure to liability and the cost of constructing and maintaining the supplemental safety measures. Staff has begun this process. Complying with the Federal Process: As the first step in the federal process, staff has identified the following grade crossings in and around Rohnert Park that could be included in a quiet zone (see Attachment 2): • Railroad Avenue (located in Sonoma County) 2 ITEM NO. 7 • East Cotati Avenue (located in the City of Cotati) • Southwest Boulevard • Rohnert Park Expressway • Golf Course Drive. Federal regulations do not require review and evaluation of the two Copeland Creek path crossings as part of the quiet zone establishment process. The Federal Railroad Administration is only required to review public grade crossings, and pedestrian crossings are considered "private" crossings. These two crossings will be in the quiet zone, but they were not evaluated for supplemental safety measures that could be installed and are not included in the risk calculator. Staff coordinated a diagnostic review, which is the second step in the federal process, as part of the research necessary to evaluate quiet zone feasibility. The review included representatives of Rohnert Park, Cotati, Sonoma County, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the FRA, and SMART. The diagnostic review was intended to accomplish three tasks: • Update existing Inventory Forms for each crossing with the FRA so that all participants have the most up-to-date information; • Identify existing Supplemental Safety Measures (SSMs) and Alternative Safety Measures (ASMs) at each crossing; and • Identify potential SSMs or ASMs that could be installed or modified to count towards reducing the risk index for the zone from Railroad Avenue to Golf Course Drive. Supplemental safety measures can take a variety of forms and serve to prevent vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians from going around lowered gates at crossings, which is a common cause of grade crossing accidents. SSMs are "pre -approved" by FRA and can include more secure gate -crossing systems, median improvements that reduce the potential to get onto the tracks, channelization devices that physically separate traffic, or one-way streets with gates. Alternate Safety Measures (ASMs) can also be proposed and typically include shortened medians. These measures are often installed at grade crossings that have specific constraints, such as a driveway or intersection on one side of the grade crossing, which precludes the use of a median. ASMs require an additional approval process by the FRA, which can take 8 to 10 months to complete, before being able to pursue a quiet zone for that crossing. Field Review Findings: At all of the crossing locations reviewed, W10-1 ("Railroad Crossing") signs and the signs designating the start and end of the quiet zone would need to be installed in the correct locations prior to establishing a quiet zone. Also, updated traffic counts will be required for each intersection. The Railroad Avenue crossing (Attachment 3) is in Sonoma County but borders Sonoma Mountain Village in Rohnert Park. The crossing includes a 60 foot median on the east side of the crossing (because of existing access road constraints) and a 100 foot median on the west side of the crossing. Because of the shorted median on the east side of the crossing, this intersection needs to be reviewed and approved as ASM by the FRA, before any improvements at the Railroad Avenue crossing can be used to lower the overall quiet zone risk threshold. As indicated above, this could take 8 to 10 months. The East Cotati Avenue crossing (Attachment 4) is within the City of Cotati limits but borders Rohnert Park neighborhoods. This crossing requires the installation of a bollard in the middle of ITEM NO. 7 the new pedestrian crosswalk parallel to the railroad crossing to allow the existing median to qualify as an SSM, thus lowering the overall quiet zone risk score. The Southwest Boulevard crossing (Attachment 5) includes an existing median in each direction. The medians will need to be raised and extended and a bollard will need to be added in pedestrian crossing in order to create an SSM that will lower the overall quiet zone risk threshold. The Rohnert Park Expressway grade crossing (Attachment 6) requires a raised median for 100' in each direction to replace the existing inverted median. A 1" roll over dike needs to be installed on the access driveway to the SMART station to deter vehicles from entering while still giving access to emergency vehicles. The Golf Couse Drive grade crossing (Attachment 7) has two driveways within 100 feet of the tracks. Because it is likely infeasible to eliminate those driveways (one is access to a Chevron station and one is access to an undeveloped private parcel), there isn't a constructible way to use the median as an SSM. There are no other SSMs that would feasibly work at this location, meaning that the Golf Course Drive intersection would have no safety improvements, beyond signs, if a quiet zone is implemented. The diagnostic review concluded that the Rohnert Park Expressway, Southwest Boulevard, and East Cotati crossings can be retrofitted with approved SSMs that would reduce the risk factors in a potential quiet zone. The East Railroad Avenue crossing would need to be approved with a non-standard alternative safety measure by the FRA to allow for further reduction of risk in a potential quiet zone. The Golf Course Drive grade crossing cannot feasibly accommodate either approved supplemental safety measures or potentially -approvable alternative safety measures. Staff has developed two potential timelines for quiet zone formation, one assuming that only "preapproved" SSMs are proposed and the other assuming that a nonstandard ASM is requested. The timelines are included as Attachment 8 and indicate that with standard SSMs, a quiet zone designation could be achieved as early as August 2017. Including ASMs in the request extends the schedule until May 2018. These schedules are approximate at this time and may not provide adequate time for negotiating with SMART on the required agreement. The schedules indicate that it is not reasonable to expect that a quiet zone could be designated and approved prior to the beginning of SMART's fare service in April 2017. Quiet Zone Safety Calculation: Because reduced use of train horns may increase the risk of accidents at crossings, the FRA requires local agencies to evaluate the risk of the proposed zone as a whole and identify additional safety measures required to counter balance the risk that may be caused by the elimination of the train horn. The evaluation must take into consideration grade crossing geometry, traffic volume, train speed, and collision history. The FRA has established a risk calculator to help local jurisdictions through this evaluation by calculating a Quiet Zone Risk Index. The Quiet Zone Risk Index compares the safety of the quiet zone, with all approved safety measures, to two nationally established risk indices. To be approved, the Quiet Zone Risk Index must be less than at least one of these indices. The first index is the National Significant Risk Threshold (NSRT) which has a value of 14,347. The second index is the Risk Index with Horns (RIWH), which is a measure of how the proposed quiet zone would perform if the train horns were not restricted. For the proposed joint quiet zone, the Risk Index with Horns is 17,408, meaning that even when the SMART train is operating within all FRA rules, including unrestricted horns, the corridor is still rated above the National Significant Risk Threshold. 2 ITEM NO. 7 After completing the diagnostic review, Rohnert Park staff completed the FRA compliant risk calculator in order to confirm the feasibility of a quiet zone and estimate the cost of installing the safety measures. The risk calculator primarily considers types of warning devices, train speed, traffic volumes, and the proposed SSMs. The calculator indicates that the eleven crossings that would be included in a combined Rohnert Park/Cotati/County quiet zone have a risk index total of 29,036 if horns are not used and supplemental safety measures are not installed. Staff modeled the current configuration and four scenarios for SSMs including: 1. All available SSMs and ASMs are used at all Sonoma County Crossings, East Cotati, Southwest Boulevard and Rohnert Park Expressway crossings. No SSMs or ASMs are employed at Golf Course Drive because they are not feasible. 2. SSMs are employed at all crossings except East Railroad Avenue where there is currently an ASM. No SSMs or ASMs are employed at Golf Course drive because they are not feasible. 3. SSMs are employed at all crossings except Golf Course Drive, Rohnert Park Expressway, and East Railroad Avenue. 4. SSMs are employed at all crossings except Golf Course Drive and Rohnert Park Expressway. Table 1 presents a summary of this work and illustrates that all scenarios are viable, although scenario 1 is "most safe". Attachment 9 provides additional backup. Summary of Quiet Zone Risk Index Options (Table 1) SSM Construction Options Current Configuration Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 West Robles Ave N Y Y Y Y Todd Road N Y Y Y Y Scenic Ave N Y Y Y Y Golf Course Drive N N N N N Rohnert Park Expressway N Y Y N N Southwest Blvd N Y Y Y Y East Cotati Ave N Y Y Y Y East Railroad Ave N Y N N Y Old Adobe Road N Y Y Y Y Main St/ Woodward N Y Y Y Y Ely Road N N Y Y Y Y Risk With Quiet Zone* 29,036 10,604 11,743 16,355 15,217 Risk Index with Horns** 17,408 17,408 17,408 17,408 17,408 *Supplemental and Alternative Safety Measures are infeasible on Golf Course Drive ** Lower score is less risk Scenarios three and four indicate that Rohnert Park may not need to implement SSMs at both Southwest Boulevard and Rohnert Park Expressway to implement a quiet zone. The scenarios indicate that the quiet zone is below the Risk Index with Horns threshold even with some supplemental safety measures not installed. However, staff does not have clear information on 5 ITEM NO. 7 whether or not implementing all feasible SSMs will be required or could be advantageous to the City, as part of an agreement with SMART. In order to provide the Council with a conservative estimate of the costs of establishing a quiet zone, staff has assumed that the City would need to install/ refurbish both medians on Rohnert Park Expressway and Southwest Blvd as part of establishing a quiet zone. The expected cost of this work is approximately $300,000 and is illustrated in Table 2. These costs include an estimate for signage, traffic counts and allowance for staff time and legal review. Staff has assigned a fifty percent (50%) contingency to the construction work because estimates have been developed without the benefit of design activity beyond the diagnostic review. Table 2 Projected Costs For SSM Installation & Quiet Zone Pursuit RPX LS Lump Sum HR Total Median Curb Perimeter Square Feet 420 LF $ 32,634 Gravel fill 1000 SQ FT $ 14,000 Roll over curb for driveway 50 LF $ 3,675 Signage Placement 1 LS $ 1,200 Traffic Control 1 LS $ 5,000 Southwest Blvd Median Curb 420 LF $ 32,634 Concrete Fill 1025 SQ FT $ 16,144 Signage Placement 1 LS $ 1,200 Bollard Installation 6 EA $ 9,000 Traffic Control 1 LS $ 5,000 Construction Contingency 1 LS $ 60,243 Other Costs Construction Management 1 LS $ 6,024 SMART Encroachment Permit 1 LS $ 1,500 Inspections 1 LS $ 6,024 Staff Time $ 120 HR $ 18,720 Legal Review $ 1 LS $ 25,000 Reimbersement to Lead Agency $ 180 HR $ 7,200 Design 1 LS $ 20,000 Traffic Count 1 LS $ 3,300 Other contingency 1 LS $ 30,000 TOTAL $ 298,499 Legend LF Linear Feet LS Lump Sum HR Per Hour SQ FT Square Feet rol ITEM NO. 7 Investigating Interagency Partnerships: Finally, because of the proximity of Rohnert Park, Cotati, and Sonoma County, SMART and the FRA have indicated that the two cities and the County would benefit from pursuing a quiet zone jointly in order to cover all segments of the City. Both the FRA and CPUC expressed that from a safety standpoint, it would be highly beneficial to have the County and cities work together to create one quiet zone for the area. Both regulators indicated that when train horn rules change frequently within a short distance there is a higher probability of confusion for the train operator and the public and a higher risk for accidents due to this confusion. Sonoma County has expressed that they will be pursuing quiet zones in a couple of segments for all of their crossings around the end of the year. The County has offered to be the "lead agency" and has requested that the City join this effort to form a joint quiet zone. Sonoma County has indicated that they intend on bringing each of their crossings below the National Significant Risk Threshold of 14,347. This is below the Risk Index with Horns that was evaluated in Table 2. The County believes this decision will help mitigate their liability. The County believes that a quiet zone could be established even if the City did not invest in all feasible SSMs, as long as the overall quiet zone "score" is below the Risk Index with Horns, which is 17,408. While this may be feasible as a proposal to the regulatory agencies, staff does not know if this will have adverse impacts on the City's liability. For this reason, staff has budgeted the quiet zone establishment to include the installation of all feasible SSMs in Rohnert Park. If both the City and the County install all feasible SSMs, the result would be similar to Scenario 1, evaluated in Table 2 and the corridor would have a "score" that is below the National Significant Risk Threshold of 14,347. This is a relatively conservative approach which will ideally mitigate long term liability, although it does increase first costs. Staff has been in communication with other agencies and has been able to gauge the intention for each agency affected by the issue of quiet zones which is presented in Table 3. The table indicates that with the exception of Cotati and Rohnert Park, all SMART member agencies either have or are expecting direction to pursue quiet zones. Table 3 Agency Proceeding with Notice of Intent? City of Petaluma Yes- Council Directed City of Santa Rosa Yes- Council Directed Sonoma County Yes- Board direction expected in December 2016 City of Cotati Not currently City of Novato Yes- Council Directed City of San Rafael Yes- Council Directed Marin County Yes- Council Directed Pursuit of an Agreement with SMART: In order for the City to establish a quiet zone, it must negotiate an agreement with SMART to set forth responsibilities for constructing and maintaining SSMs and ASMs (e.g., striping and median maintenance) because these improvements must be completed inside SMART's right-of-way. The Agreement will likely also 7 ITEM NO. 7 set SMART's and the City's liabilities in the event of any claims in or around the quiet zones (e.g., indemnification). Currently, several Cities are negotiating these agreements with SMART, but none have been finalized, and the language has not become public. Important issues include whether they will track standard legal rules delineating the cities' and SMART's obligations regarding the construction and maintenance of the SSMs and ASMs, and/or whether SMART will demand that the agreements shift burdens and liabilities to the cities that would not otherwise fall to the cities. Staff believes that one effective method for securing the best possible agreement with SMART is to negotiate with the County and ideally the other agencies pursing quiet zones. While this is unlikely to remove all risk from the City, SMART's Board of Directors is ultimately composed of the various cities and counties, and working together should result in the best overall outcome for the public at large. Summary: While staff believes that there is an inherent risk with the designation of a railroad quiet zone, it is technically feasible to designate a quiet zone through the City that can be approved by the regulating agencies. There is a strong consensus amongst the other agencies in the area to designate quiet zones and the regulators acknowledge that consistent quiet zone designation is preferable from a safety and public awareness standpoint. The County has offered to be the lead agency for formation of the quiet zone which provides the City with strong negotiating partner. This may improve the chances of securing a reasonable and equitable agreement with SMART. The City has received a number of comments from residents regarding this issue, which are included as Attachment 10. Designating a quiet zone will come with a cost of $300,000. This cost is currently not budgeted and will likely need to funded from the City's General Fund. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: While staff believes that there is inherent risk with designation of a railroad quiet zone, pursuing this action in partnership with the County of Sonoma would be consistent with Strategic Plan Goal A — Practice Participative Leadership at all Levels and Strategic Plan Goal C — Ensure Effective Delivery of Public Services. SMART is providing a new valuable public service to our community. However, this service creates impacts and requires some adjustments by the population. Quiet zone designations could help mitigate some of the noise impacts. Staff believes that participating with the County and other cities along the rail corridor provides the best option to recognize the most benefits from the quiet zone or zones while arriving a fair and considered method for sharing the risk with SMART. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: 1. Partner with the County of Sonoma on a Railroad Quiet Zone that includes the City of Rohnert Park (recommended action). This option will provide for a coordinated quiet zone that will provide the most benefit to the residents of Rohnert Park. Also, by partnering with the County, the City is likely to secure to the most favorable agreement with SMART because we will be part of a group of agencies negotiating together. 2. Initiate a Rohnert Park only quiet zone (not recommended). Because of the City's proximity to crossings in the County and Cotati, this action would be less effective in minimizing noise impacts. The action would likely result in additional costs for the City because it would be not be able to share effort with other agencies. The action could result in increased liability for the City because it would not have the benefit of negotiating collectively with other agencies about the SMART Quiet Zone Agreement. N. ITEM NO. 7 3. Take no action at this time (not recommended). The City may initiate the formation of quiet zone at any time so the City Council does not have to act now in order to preserve its future options. However, staff believes that acting in cooperation with Sonoma County provides the City with the best most cost effective way to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks associated with establishing a quiet zone. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: The estimated fiscal impact of this action is $300,000. This estimate includes: • Coordination with the County on the NOI and the City's letter of support and negotiation with SMART on the Quiet Zone Agreement • Design, construction and administration costs for the quiet zone improvements • Legal costs associated with review of the NOI and letter of support and the SMART Quiet Zone Agreement. The proposed funding source for this work would be the Infrastructure Fund, which is funded through transfers from the General Fund. Staff anticipates that budget amendments will be necessary if the Council directs the recommended work on quiet zones. Department Head Approval Date: 11/16/16 Finance Director Approval Date: NA City Attorney Approval Date: 11/16/16 City Manager Approval Date: 11/17/16 Attachments (list in packet assembly order): 1. SMART draft Schedule 2. Map of Rail Stations and Grade Crossings 3. Diagnostic Review Findings- East Railroad Avenue 4. Diagnostic Review Findings- E Cotati Avenue 5. Diagnostic Review Findings- Southwest Blvd 6. Diagnostic Review Findings- Rohnert Park Expressway 7. Diagnostic Review Findings- Golf Course Drive 8. Schedule for Quiet Zone establishment 9. FRA calculator results 10. Public comment received 6 ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Nov'16 I Dec'16 Jan '17 I Feb '17 I Mar'17 I Apr'17 I May'17 IJun'17 I Jul'17 I Au'17 I Se '17 Oct '17 Nov'17 I Dec'17 Jan Feb '18 Mar'18 A r'18 Ma '18 Ju 30 6 132027 4 111825 1 8 152229 5 121926 5 121926 2 9 162330 7 142128 4 111825 2 9 162330 6 132027 3 101724 1181151221291511211912613 11011712413117 11412112814 11111812514 111825 1 8 152229 6 132027 3 1 Identify Crossings Complete Diagnostic Review 0 days 0 days Mon 1/2/17 Mon 1/2/17 Mon 1/2/17 Mon 1/2/17 ♦ 1/2 ♦ 1/2 2 with applicable agencies Receive Council Direction Send Notice of Intent Receive Approval of ASMs (if 30 days 60 days 210 days Tue 1/3/17 Tue 2/14/17 Tue 2/14/17 Mon 2/13/17 Mon 5/8/17 Mon IF 3 4 5 needed)* Construct SSMs/ ASMs and 100 days Tue 12/5/17 12/4/17 Mon 6 Install Signage Send Notice of Quiet Zone 21 days Tue 4/24/18 4/23/18 Tue 5/22/18 7 Establishment Quiet Zone Established 1 day Wed 5/23/18 Wed 5/23/18 8 Task Project Summary Manual Task I I Start -only E Deadline Project: Schedule for Quiet Zon Split ................... . . Inactive Task Duration -only Finish -only ] Progress Date: Fri 11/11/16 Milestone ♦ Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Summary Inactive Summary Manual Summary I I External Milestone Page 1 ID Task Name Duration (Start Finish I Nov '1 30 6 13 I Dec'16 20 27 4 11 18 25 Jan '17 1 8 15 22 I Feb '17 I Mar'17 IApr'17 29 5 12 19 26 5 12 19 26 2 9 Ma '17 IJun '17 IJul '17 Au '17 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 1 2 9 16 23 30 6 1 Identify Crossings Complete Diagnostic Review with applicable agencies Receive Council Direction Send Notice of Intent Construct SSMs/ ASMs and Install Signage Send Notice of Quiet Zone Establishment Quiet Zone Established 0 days 0 days 30 days 60 days 100 days 21 days 1 day Mon 1/2/17 Mon 1/2/17 Tue 1/3/17 Tue 2/14/17 Tue 2/14/17 Tue 7/4/17 Wed 8/2/17 Mon 1/2/17 Mon 1/2/17 Mon 2/13/17 Mon 5/8/17 Mon 7/3/17 Tue 8/1/17 Wed 8/2/17 ♦ 1/2 ♦ 1/2 IT 2 3 4 5 6 7 Project: Schedule for Quiet Zon Date: Fri 11/11/16 Task Split Milestone Summary F� ..„..„..„...... ,,,,, ♦ Project Summary Inactive Task Inactive Milestone Inactive Summary Manual Task I Duration -only Manual Summary Rollup Manual Summary I I Start -only ! Finish -only 1 I External Tasks I External Milestone Deadline Progress Manual Progress Page 1 Document: T:\Projects\2016\SMART\S MART_crossings2.mzd 10/17/2016 654 E Railroad Ave - Google Maps M Google Image capture: Apr 2016 © 2016 Google https://www.goog!e.com/maps/@38.3142923,-122.6809158,3a,60y,269.92h,92.48t/data=!3m 6! 1 e1 !3m4! 1 sdeK8Gm KsGhXtpFM N VG034w!2e0!7i 1331206656 2/3 10/17/2016 1002 E Cotati Ave - Google Maps I 0 0 0 Image capture: Apr 2016 @ 2016 Google https://www.google.com/maps/@38.3319802,-122.6912744,3a,75y,253.09h,87.61 t/data=!3m6! 1 e1 !3m4! 1 sH hPUYXDGYl lv8QyBi i 5JAQ!2eO!7i 13312!8!6656 2/3 if ti .. tl ',1- ' s� tie .r y, � ,lt •'� s � . r r l % T Yyy � 1t AR _ Rohner�t rk Ex}�.y • , Rahnert Park Expy Rohnert f'arlt has y Ro imerI Park Exp Roh lr —� i e ar Ex • R© Wert Park Expy kX • . Y • '� R , •, 1 ril ♦ � � r , .fir * Google « •�� x rdtr • of TM7-1 ��. j 1= 4 F - r:• Ck CC irs- �f `Y a - - — � J � J c r� Sierra-Raeitic•�,Aani sol` � ' cl C►►nurse � r �� - F,' z ��•. ',cel l i , - '- #� G©If Course Dr Golf CoTr`sr�=� Google =' FRA - Quiet Zone Calculator Page 1 of 1 Print This Page Home l Help l Contact I log Off, marin@rpcity.org Cancel I Change Scenario: I QUIET ZONE 49173 V I Continue Crossing Street Traffic Warning Device Pre -SSM SSM Risk Create New Zone 498665X WEST ROBLES AVE. 1000 Gates 0 0 12,456.52 MODIFY Manage Existing Zones Log Off Step by Step Instructions: Step 1: To specify New Warning Device (For Pre -Rule Quiet Zone Only) and/or SSM, click the MODIFY Button Step 2: Select proposed warning device or SSM. Then click the UPDATE button.To generate a spreadsheet of the values on this page, click on ASM button—This spreadsheet can then be used for ASM calculations. * Only Public At Grade Crossings are listed. Click for Supplementary Safety Measures rSSMI Step 3: Repeat Step (2) until the SELECT button is shown at the bottom Click for ASM spreadsheet: ASM * Note:The use of right side of this page. Note that the SELECT button is shown ONLY when ASMs requires an application to and approval from the FRA. the Quiet Zone Risk Index falls below the NSRT or the Risk Index with Horn. Step 4: To save the scenario and continue, click the SELECT button 49867OU TODD ROAD 900 Gates 0 0 12,114. 498671B SCENIC AVE. 800 Gates 0 0 14,404. 498673P GOLF COURSE DRIVE 7004 Gates 0 0 64,835. V 498674W ROHNERT PARK EXPY 10000 Gates 0 0 63,422. 498675D SOUTHWEST BLVD 10000 Gates 0 0 60,698. 498676K EAST COTATI AVE. 8080 Gates 0 0 24,515. 4986775 EAST RAILROAD AVE 1400 Gates 0 0 16,694. 49867BY OLD ADOBE ROAD 1900 Gates 0 0 17,354. 498679F MAIN ST/WOODWARD 2500 Gates 0 0 18,624. 498680A ELY ROAD N 900 Gates 0 0 14,270. 15 MODIFY 82 MODIFY 86 MODIFY 42 MODIFY 90 MODIFY 72 MODIFY 75 MODIFY 96 MODIFY 87 MODIFY 72 MODIFY Summary Proposed Quiet Zone: Quiet Zone- 2nd Segment of Sonoma County- Cotati-RP Type: New 24-hour QZ Scenario: QUIET ZONE -49173 Estimated Total Cost: $0.00 Nationwide Significant Risk Threshold: 14347 .00 Risk Index with Horns: 17407.55 Quiet Zone Risk Index: 29035.79 https:Hsafetydata.fra.dot.gov/Quiet/scen.aspx?zoneid=39619 11/15/2016 FRA - Quiet Zone Calculator Page 1 of 1 Print This Page Home l Help l Contact I log Off, marin@rpcity.org Create New Zone Manage Existing Zones Log Off Step by Step Instructions: Step 1: To specify New Warning Device (For Pre -Rule Quiet Zone Only) and/or SSM, click the MODIFY Button Step 2: Select proposed warning device or SSM. Then click the UPDATE Cancel I Change Scenario: I QUIET ZONE 49173 Crossing Street Traffic Warning Device 498665X WEST ROBLES AVE. 1000 Gates 49867OU TODD ROAD 900 Gates 498671B SCENIC AVE. 800 Gates 498673P GOLF COURSE DRIVE 7004 Gates 498674W ROHNERT PARK EXPY 10000 Gates 498675D SOUTHWEST BLVD 10000 Gates 498676K EAST COTATI AVE. 8080 Gates 4986775 EAST RAILROAD AVE 1400 Gates 49867BY OLD ADOBE ROAD 1900 Gates 498679F MAIN ST/WOODWARD 2500 Gates 498680A ELY ROAD N 900 Gates V I Pre -SSM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 0 0 Continue SSM Risk 13 2,491.30 13 2,422.83 12 3,601.21 — 0 64,835.86 13 12,684.48 13 12,139.78 13 4,903.14 12 4,173.69 4,338.74 7 1,489.99 12 3,567.68 button—This spreadsheet can then be New 24-hour QZ MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY button.To generate a spreadsheet of the values on this page, click on ASM Quiet Zone- 2nd Segment of Sonoma County- Cotati-RP button—This spreadsheet can then be New 24-hour QZ used for ASM calculations. * Only Public At Grade Crossings are listed. Estimated Total Cost: Click for Supplementary Safety Measures rSSMI Step 3: Repeat Step (2) until the 14347 .00 SELECT button is shown at the bottom Click for ASM spreadsheet: ASM * Note:The use of right side of this page. Note that the 10604.43 SELECT button is shown ONLY when ASMs requires an application to and approval from the FRA. the Quiet Zone Risk Index falls below the NSRT or the Risk Index with Horn. Step 4: To save the scenario and continue, click the SELECT button Summary Proposed Quiet Zone: Quiet Zone- 2nd Segment of Sonoma County- Cotati-RP Type: New 24-hour QZ Scenario: QUIET ZONE -49173 Estimated Total Cost: $267,000.00 Nationwide Significant Risk Threshold: 14347 .00 Risk Index with Horns: 17407.55 Quiet Zone Risk Index: 10604.43 Select https:Hsafetydata.fra.dot.gov/Quiet/scen.aspx?zoneid=39619 11/15/2016 FRA - Quiet Zone Calculator Page 1 of 1 Print This Page Home l Help l Contact I log Off, marin@rpcity.org Create New Zone Manage Existing Zones Log Off Step by Step Instructions: Step 1: To specify New Warning Device (For Pre -Rule Quiet Zone Only) and/or SSM, click the MODIFY Button Step 2: Select proposed warning device or SSM. Then click the UPDATE Cancel I Change Scenario: I QUIET ZONE 49173 Crossing Street Traffic Warning Device 498665X WEST ROBLES AVE. 1000 Gates 49867OU TODD ROAD 900 Gates 498671B SCENIC AVE. 800 Gates 498673P GOLF COURSE DRIVE 7004 Gates 498674W ROHNERT PARK EXPY 10000 Gates 498675D SOUTHWEST BLVD 10000 Gates 498676K EAST COTATI AVE. 8080 Gates 4986775 EAST RAILROAD AVE 1400 Gates 49867BY OLD ADOBE ROAD 1900 Gates 498679F MAIN ST/WOODWARD 2500 Gates 498680A ELY ROAD N 900 Gates V I Pre -SSM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 0 0 Continue SSM Risk 13 2,491.30 13 2,422.83 12 3,601.21 — 0 64,835.86 13 12,684.48 13 12,139.78 13 4,903.14 0 16,694.75 4,338.74 7 1,489.99 12 3,567.68 button—This spreadsheet can then be New 24-hour QZ MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY button.To generate a spreadsheet of the values on this page, click on ASM Quiet Zone- 2nd Segment of Sonoma County- Cotati-RP button—This spreadsheet can then be New 24-hour QZ used for ASM calculations. * Only Public At Grade Crossings are listed. Estimated Total Cost: Click for Supplementary Safety Measures rSSMI Step 3: Repeat Step (2) until the 14347 .00 SELECT button is shown at the bottom Click for ASM spreadsheet: ASM * Note:The use of right side of this page. Note that the 11742.71 SELECT button is shown ONLY when ASMs requires an application to and approval from the FRA. the Quiet Zone Risk Index falls below the NSRT or the Risk Index with Horn. Step 4: To save the scenario and continue, click the SELECT button Summary Proposed Quiet Zone: Quiet Zone- 2nd Segment of Sonoma County- Cotati-RP Type: New 24-hour QZ Scenario: QUIET ZONE -49173 Estimated Total Cost: $254,000.00 Nationwide Significant Risk Threshold: 14347 .00 Risk Index with Horns: 17407.55 Quiet Zone Risk Index: 11742.71 Select https:Hsafetydata.fra.dot.gov/Quiet/scen.aspx?zoneid=39619 11/15/2016 FRA - Quiet Zone Calculator Page 1 of 1 Print This Page Home l Help l Contact I log Off, marin@rpcity.org Create New Zone Manage Existing Zones Log Off Step by Step Instructions: Step 1: To specify New Warning Device (For Pre -Rule Quiet Zone Only) and/or SSM, click the MODIFY Button Step 2: Select proposed warning device or SSM. Then click the UPDATE Cancel I Change Scenario: I QUIET ZONE 49173 Crossing Street Traffic Warning Device 498665X WEST ROBLES AVE. 1000 Gates 49867OU TODD ROAD 900 Gates 498671B SCENIC AVE. 800 Gates 498673P GOLF COURSE DRIVE 7004 Gates 498674W ROHNERT PARK EXPY 10000 Gates 498675D SOUTHWEST BLVD 10000 Gates 498676K EAST COTATI AVE. 8080 Gates 4986775 EAST RAILROAD AVE 1400 Gates 49867BY OLD ADOBE ROAD 1900 Gates 498679F MAIN ST/WOODWARD 2500 Gates 498680A ELY ROAD N 900 Gates V I Pre -SSM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Continue SSM Risk 13 2,491.30 13 2,422.83 12 3,601.21 0 164,835.86 0 63,422.42 13 12,139.78 13 4,903.14 0 16,694.75 12 4,338.74 7 1,489.99 12 3,567.68 button—This spreadsheet can then be New 24-hour QZ MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY button.To generate a spreadsheet of the values on this page, click on ASM Quiet Zone- 2nd Segment of Sonoma County- Cotati-RP button—This spreadsheet can then be New 24-hour QZ used for ASM calculations. * Only Public At Grade Crossings are listed. Step 3: Repeat Step (2) until the ALERT: Quiet Zone qualifies because QZRI is less SELECT button is shown at the bottom than Risk Index with Horns. right side of this page. Note that the 17407.55 SELECT button is shown ONLY when Click for Supplementary Safety Measures fSSMI the Quiet Zone Risk Index falls below the NSRT or the Risk Index with Horn. Click for ASM spreadsheet: ASM * Note:The use of Step 4: To save the scenario and ASMs requires an application to and approval from the FRA. continue, click the SELECT button Summary Proposed Quiet Zone: Quiet Zone- 2nd Segment of Sonoma County- Cotati-RP Type: New 24-hour QZ Scenario: QUIET ZONE -49173 Estimated Total Cost: $239,000.00 Nationwide Significant Risk Threshold: 14347 .00 Risk Index with Horns: 17407.55 Quiet Zone Risk Index: 16355.25 Select https:Hsafetydata.fra.dot.gov/Quiet/scen.aspx?zoneid=39619 11/15/2016 FRA - Quiet Zone Calculator Page 1 of 1 Print This Page Home l Help l Contact I log Off, marin@rpcity.org Create New Zone Manage Existing Zones Log Off Step by Step Instructions: Step 1: To specify New Warning Device (For Pre -Rule Quiet Zone Only) and/or SSM, click the MODIFY Button Step 2: Select proposed warning device or SSM. Then click the UPDATE Cancel I Change Scenario: I QUIET ZONE 49173 Crossing Street Traffic Warning Device 498665X WEST ROBLES AVE. 1000 Gates 49867OU TODD ROAD 900 Gates 498671B SCENIC AVE. 800 Gates 498673P GOLF COURSE DRIVE 7004 Gates 498674W ROHNERT PARK EXPY 10000 Gates 498675D SOUTHWEST BLVD 10000 Gates 498676K EAST COTATI AVE. 8080 Gates 4986775 EAST RAILROAD AVE 1400 Gates 49867BY OLD ADOBE ROAD 1900 Gates 498679F MAIN ST/WOODWARD 2500 Gates 498680A ELY ROAD N 900 Gates V I Pre -SSM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Continue SSM Risk 13 2,491.30 13 2,422.83 12 3,601.21 0 164,835.86 0 63,422.42 13 12,139.78 13 4,903.14 12 4,173.69 12 4,338.74 7 1,489.99 12 3,567.68 button—This spreadsheet can then be New 24-hour QZ MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY MODIFY button.To generate a spreadsheet of the values on this page, click on ASM Quiet Zone- 2nd Segment of Sonoma County- Cotati-RP button—This spreadsheet can then be New 24-hour QZ used for ASM calculations. * Only Public At Grade Crossings are listed. Step 3: Repeat Step (2) until the ALERT: Quiet Zone qualifies because QZRI is less SELECT button is shown at the bottom than Risk Index with Horns. right side of this page. Note that the 17407.55 SELECT button is shown ONLY when Click for Supplementary Safety Measures fSSMI the Quiet Zone Risk Index falls below the NSRT or the Risk Index with Horn. Click for ASM spreadsheet: ASM * Note:The use of Step 4: To save the scenario and ASMs requires an application to and approval from the FRA. continue, click the SELECT button Summary Proposed Quiet Zone: Quiet Zone- 2nd Segment of Sonoma County- Cotati-RP Type: New 24-hour QZ Scenario: QUIET ZONE -49173 Estimated Total Cost: $252,000.00 Nationwide Significant Risk Threshold: 14347 .00 Risk Index with Horns: 17407.55 Quiet Zone Risk Index: 15216.97 Select https:Hsafetydata.fra.dot.gov/Quiet/scen.aspx?zoneid=39619 11/15/2016 � WC. b .4 000 SAP ansa 000, f$ M AM DRAFT WEEKDAY SERVICE CONCEPT DRAFT CONCEPTUAL SMART Weekday Train Service: Sonoma County Airport and San Rafael Southbound - Sonoma County Airport to San Rafael (READ DOWN) TRAIN NO. 4 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 Stations I am pm Sonoma County Airporl Iv 4:49 5:19 5:49 6:19 6:49 7:19 7:49 8:19 1:19 3:19 3:49 4:19 4:49 5:19 5:49 Santa Rosa North Iv 4:56 5:26 5:56 6:26 6:56 7:26 7:56 8:26 1:26 3:26 3:56 4:26 4:56 5:26 5:56 Santa Rosa Downtown Iv 5:01 5:31 6:01 6:31 7:01 7:31 8:01 8:31 1:31 3:31 4:01 4:31 5:01 5:31 6:01 Rohnert Park Iv 5:08 5:38 6:08 6:38 7:08 7:38 8:08 8:38 1:38 3:38 4:08 4:38 5:08 5:38 6:08 Cotati Iv 5:12 5:42 6:12 6:42 7:12 7:42 8:12 8:42 1:42 3:42 4:12 4:42 5:12 5:42 6:12 Petaluma Downtown Iv 5:25 5:55 6:25 6:55 7:25 7:55 8:25 8:55 1:55 3:55 4:25 4:55 5:25 5:55 6:25 Novato - San Marin Iv 5:36 6:06 6:36 7:06 7:36 8:06 8:36 9:06 2:06 4:06 4:36 5:06 5:36 6:06 6:36 Novato - Hamilton Iv 5:44 6:14 6:44 7:14 7:44 8:14 8:44 9:14 2:14 4:14 4:44 5:14 5:44 6:14 6:44 Marin Civic Center Iv 5:50 6:20 6:50 7:20 7:50 8:20 8:50 9:20 2:20 4:20 4:50 5:20 5:50 6:20 6:50 San Rafael ar 5:56 6:26 6:56 7:26 7:56 8:26 8:56 9:26 2:26 4:26 4:56 5:26 5:56 6:26 6:56 Northbound - San Rafael to Sonoma County Airport (READ DOWN) TRAIN NO. 4 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Stations 1. am pm San Rafael Iv 6:29 6:59 7:29 7:59 8:29 8:59 11:59 3:59 4:29 4:59 5:29 5:59 6:29 6:59 7:29 Marin Civic Center Iv 6:35 7:05 7:35 8:05 8:35 9:05 12:05pm 4:05 4:35 5:05 5:35 6:05 6:35 7:05 7:35 Novato - Hamilton Iv 6:41 7:11 7:41 8:11 8:41 9:11 12:11 4:11 4:41 5:11 5:41 6:11 6:41 7:11 7:41 Novato - San Mairn Iv 6:49 7:19 7:49 8:19 8:49 9:19 12:19 4:19 4:49 5:19 5:49 6:19 6:49 7:19 7:49 Petaluma Downtown Iv 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 12:30 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 Cotati Iv 7:13 7:43 8:13 8:43 9:13 9:43 12:43 4:43 5:13 5:43 6:13 6:43 7:13 7:43 8:13 Rohnert Park Iv 7:17 7:47 8:17 8:47 9:17 9:47 12:47 4:47 5:17 5:47 6:17 6:47 7:17 7:47 8:17 Santa Rosa Downtown ar 7:24 7:54 8:24 8:54 9:24 9:54 12:54 4:54 5:24 5:54 6:24 6:54 7:24 7:54 8:24 Santa Rosa North Iv 7:29 7:59 8:29 8:59 9:29 9:59 12:59 4:59 5:29 5:59 6:29 6:59 7:29 7:59 8:29 Sonoma County Airporl Iv 7:36 8:06 8:36 9:06 9:36 10:06 1:06 5:06 5:36 6:06 6:36 7:06 7:36 8:06 8:36 am times shown in light type face pm times shown in bold type face SMART 11 SONOMA-MARIN AREA RAIL TRANSIT DRAFT WEEKEND/HOLIDAY CONCEPT WITH FERRY SHUTTLE DRAFT PHASE 1 Saturday/Sunday/Holiday CONCEPT with San Rafael— Larkspur Shuttle and Current (December 2015) Ferry Schedule SOUTHBOUND TRAIN NO -> TRAIN NO -> 51 53 55 57 59 61 Stations J Stations J am am pm pm Airport Iv 8:03 --- --- 3:18 6:18 --- Santa Rosa North Iv 8:10 --- --- 3:25 6:23 --- Santa Rosa Downtown Iv 8:15 10:25 12:25 3:30 6:30 --- Rohnert Park Iv 8:22 10:32 12:32 3:37 6:37 --- Cotati Iv 8:26 10:36 12:36 3:41 6:41 --- Petaluma Downtown Iv 8:39 10:49 12:49 3:54 6:54 8:10 Novato -San Marin Iv 8:50 11:00 1:00 4:05 7:05 8:21 Novato -Hamilton Iv 8:58 11:08 1:08 4:13 7:13 8:29 Civic Center Iv Iv. 9:32 11:37 2:07 7: — —872-5 San Rafael arr. 5 7: 5 San Rafael (shuttle) Iv. 9:15 11:25 1:25 4:30 7:35 8:35 Larkspur (shuttle) arr. 9:25 11:35 1:35 4:40 7:45 8:45 Larkspur (Ferry) Iv. 9:30 11:40 1:40 4:45 --- --- SF (Ferry) arr. 10:30 12:30 2:30 1 5:35 --- DRAFT PHASE 1 Saturday/Sunday/Holiday CONCEPT with San Rafael—Larkspur Shuttle and Current (December 2015) Ferry Schedule NORTHBOUND TRAIN NO -> 52 54 56 58 60 62 Stations J am pm SF (Ferry) Iv. --- --- 12:40 3:45 6:25 7'25 Larkspur arr. --- --- 1:30 4:35 7:15 8.10 Fer Larkspur Iv. 9:00 11:10 1:40 4:45 7:20 8'20 Shuttle San Rafael (Shuttle) arr. 9:10 11:20 1:50 4:55 7:30 8:30 San Rafael Iv. 9:20 11:25 1:55 5:00 7:35 8:40 Civic Center Iv. 9:26 11:31 2:01 5:06 7:41 8:46 Novato- Iv. 9:32 11:37 2:07 5:12 7:47 8'52 Hamilton Novato -San Iv. 9:40 11:45 2:15 5:20 7:55 9:00 Marin Petaluma IV. 9:51 11:56 2:26 5:31 8:06 Downtown 9:11 Cotati Iv. 10:04 12:09pm 2:39 5:44 --- Rohnert Park Iv. 10:08 12:13 2:43 5:48 --- 9:28 Santa Rosa Iv. 10:15 12:20 2:50 5:55 --- 9:35 Downtown North Santa Iv --- --- 2:55 6:00 --- 9:40 Rosa Airport arr. --- --- 3:02 6:07 --- 9:47 ,�k�SMART 11 SQNOMA-MARIN AREA RAIL TRANSIT Marin, Vanessa From: Adams, Carol Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 4:59 PM To: Adams, Carol Subject: FW: Smart noise - complaint From: Bob Hoffman [mailto:bhoff@ips.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 4:07 PM To: Admin Subject: Smart noise - complaint I live a half block from the Smart tracks and close to the new Cotati station. PLEASE do something to dampen down the noise level from the train horns. It's really terribly load. Nothing was noted when we voted for Smart that indicted the level of the horn noise, or perhaps we wouldn't have voted for it. Santa Rosa it seems is working towards getting the sound dampened through residential areas. PLEASE do the same for Rohnert Park. A very unhappy Rohnert Park resident Marin, Vanessa From: Adams, Carol Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 4:58 PM To: Adams, Carol Subject: FW: SMART train Attachments: 8 Railroad Quiet Zones.pdf From: Ashley Thomas [mailto:athomas7829@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 1:15 PM To: Admin Subject: SMART train The SMART train has seriously changed my way Of life for the worse. I own a home that backs up to the Southwest crossing gate. The train horn goes off at all hours of the day. Sometimes 3 short honks and sometimes the conductor lays on the horn. And when the trains not coming, the gate NEVER works right. It goes off 20+ times a day for no train. And today I see this: http://www.pressdemocrat.com/news/6134937-181/santa-rosa-seeks-smart-quiet So Santa Rosa and San Rafael care more about their citizens and tax payers than Rohnert Park?? Are we looking into this as well??? Please clarify. 1 tLA X FNO D 2016 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Gi ",."Say FA'� "SRT 9 ��I/151M5� City of Rohnert Park .130 Avram Avenue. Rohnert Park, CA 94926. r7M 966-2226. Fax: rNn M-1876 CITIZEN COMPLAINT FORM PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE YOUR NAME Richard Brookes ADDREss 92 Walnut Circle, Rohnert Park CA 94928 TELEPHONE (707) 586-1935 DATE OF THE INCIDENT ongoing PLACE OF THE JNc1DENT at my home and along fhe route of the SMART train DEsmnmom Thank you for considering my request. I moved to Valley Village Mobile Home Park in 2004 because it was quiet and peaceful, a place I could pursue my craft of writing and enjoying my later years without distraction. Now, my peace and enjoyment of life is disturbed over and over each day by the very loud horn of the SMART train as it passes through Rohnert Park. This train is destroying my quality of life and is not only a nuisance but is affecting my health, increasing my stress and making it impossible to concentrate on my work. I would hope that the City could negotiate with the RR to find a way to eliminate the crossing signal from the train as it passes through Rohnert Park. There are surely more than adequate ways to warn vehicles and pedestrians without the use of the horn blasts from the train itself. Please do something to restore my quality of life and that of other residents who live close to the SMART train tracks. I am 81 years old and not in either a financial position or in a health condition that would make a move feasible. Please help. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER I FILE A COMPLAINT? The complaW is received, reviewed, and assigned to a supervisor for further investigation. You will be contacted after examination of the facts and circumstances. Marin, Vanessa From: Adams, Carol Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 4:57 PM To: Adams, Carol Subject: FW: Trains and Quiet Zones From: Doggus Maximus[mailto:giantweenerdog@Vahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2016 12:01 PM To: Admin Subject: Trains and Quiet Zones I would like to find out if, and if not, why not, Rohnert Park has applied for a Quiet Zone for the SMART trains. I have read that just about every city up and down the line has done so, but I did not see RP on the list, and want to find out why, as the noise from the beast going by is really intolerable and needs to be controlled, and perhaps a Quiet Zone would be a start. Do citizens need to get a petition going, or show up en masse at city hall meetings, in order to get something done about this noise monster? thanks Marty Martha Hamilton Scott "Life is one long process of getting tired." ...Samuel Butler, 1835-1902 Marin, Vanessa From: Adams, Carol Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 4:58 PM To: Saldanha, Caitlin; Marin, Vanessa Cc: Buergler, JoAnne; Pawson, Mary Grace Subject: FW: Quiet Zones Greetings, I am forwarding this message to you for processing as it relates to the 11/22 agenda item. Thank you, Carol From: Doggus Maximus Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 5:48 PM To: Admin Subject: Quiet Zones To the RP City Council: I am requesting that you start the process to get a Quiet Zone for Rohnert Park, to protect us from the unnecessary noise of the loud horns of the SMART trains. I live in Valley Village, fortunately not right by the train tracks, but close enough. Neighbors who are unfortunate to live right by the tracks are assaulted hourly by the horrid horns and this must be stopped, or at least lessened in severity. I know that all up and down the line, people's lives are being disrupted by these dreadful horns. I see that just about every other city in Marin and Sonoma have requested Quiet Zones, but not Rohnert Park, and I think its time that we join the list and start the process to get a Quiet Zone classification. I am told that aside from Quiet Zones, there is technology available to actually have horns that are lower in decibels and yet still safe. I request that the money be found to purchase these less noisy horns. SMART must be forced to answer to the needs and demands of the citizens that are being assaulted by the noise. Marty Martha Hamilton Scott "Life is one long process of getting tired." ...Samuel Butler, 1835-1902 Marin, Vanessa From: Barb Dahl <barbara dahl@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 12:14 PM To: Marin, Vanessa Subject: Question regrading Quiet Zone Requirements Hi Vanessa, I hope all is well with you . I was at a recent Disaster/Emergency planning meeting here in RP at the Library. The SMART outreach person was there (Michael >???). He indicated that Cotati had applied for a Quiet Zone. It was my understanding from the City Council meeting quite awhile back that they were included in our request along with the first stop in Petaluma (Railroad Avenue or whatever it's called). As there were a lot of folks there talking, I may have misunderstood him, but I believe he said Cotati had been turned down by RFA because the Quiet Zone ended at a pedestrian crossing which is not allowed. He also stated that Rohnert Park would not qualify for the same reason. I'm aware that due to a crank shaft issue, that going operational for the train has been postposed to at least the end of the 1st quarter of 2017. I've also learned that just about every jurisdiction along the line has applied for a Quiet Zone and folks are asking why hasn't Rohnert Park. So here's the questions: Is it true about Pedestrian Crossings? If so, would the fact that we are also including Cotati and 1st station in Petaluma ensure we aren't denied for thatreason? Has a decision been made on either Novato or San Rafael? Thanks, Barb Marin, Vanessa From: Adams, Carol Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 8:59 AM To: Marin, Vanessa; Saldanha, Caitlin Cc: Buergler, JoAnne; Pawson, Mary Grace Subject: FW: complaint about train horns -from Gov outreach Good Morning, Below is a SMART Train noise complaint for the 11/22 agenda item. Thanks, Carol From: Selberg, Jette Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 8:36 AM To: Adams, Carol Subject: complaint about train horns -from Gov outreach My house backs up to the railroad tracks between Southwest Blvd. And East Cotati Ave. Starting at 6am-9pm the trains lay on their horns every time they pass by. I understand it's probably a safety precaution for the road crossing, but is there any other way the trains can go about crossing the roads safely? The horns are absolutely deafening and annoying! Please consider a less noisy solution the trains crossing the roads. Thank You! Kindra Minassian 7267 Circle Dr. 7073315268 7073315268 kindraminassian@vahoo.com I S1 Mulberry Court Rohnert Park, CA 94928 November 15, 2016 Rohnert Park City Council RE: Smart Train Please consider the process for initiating a QUIET ZONE for our city, as the Smart trains are creating noise pollution for many residents. We live in Valley Village Mobile Home Park, on the side of the park next to the tracks. No longer is the quaint tooting of the horns a novelty — it is now a downright NUISANCE and disruption to the peace and quiet we hoped for when moving into a SENIOR mobile home park in Rohnert Park. I see For Sale signs throughout our park now that the trains blare all day long and into the night; it's disrupting the life styles of many of us, and for those who are house bound all day, it's a hard price to pay for sanity. These trains do not just toot two long and one short — we have counted many blasts — up to nine one night about Bpm — and this is not a one-time instance! There are other cities that are requesting QUIET ZONES for their residents (and taxpayers). Please take into consideration the elder citizens who are subjected to this unnecessary blaring of the horns and join the petitions for Smart Train to think about PEOPLE, and not just transportation and tax revenues. Thank you for your consideration and hopefuly, ACTION! Dorothy and Richard Kiehne Marin, Vanessa From: Adams, Carol Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 1:28 PM To: Saldanha, Caitlin; Marin, Vanessa Cc: Buergler, JoAnne; Pawson, Mary Grace Subject: FW: Quiet zone Hello All — here is another SMART Train correspondence for the 11/22 CC meeting. You can expect more of these coming your way soon. Thanks, Carol From: MRK1128@AOL.COM [mai Ito: mrkll28@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 11:50 AM To: Admin Subject: Quiet zone Please create a quiet zone in Rohnert Park; especially at Southwest and Expressway crossings. My home is on Walnut Circle, in Valley Village and the decibel of the horn and excessive use of it have destroyed the peace of mind, ability to sleep and value of my property has decline by 100 percent. Thank you. Fr. Mark R. King Sent from AOL Mobile Mail I Discussion and Direction on the Establishment of a Railroad Quiet Zone November 22, 2016 19 -voiANERT P4 `L�`1LIFOR'S1i 62 What is a quiet zone? Section of rail line at least /2 mile long where horns are not routinely sounded Two types of quiet zones 24 hour quiet zone Partial quiet zone: 10 pm to 7 am QUIET 7ZO4� DO[S NOT SOUS HORN Standard (Federal) Horn Requirements 2long- I short- I long whistle blasts- repeated r Begin horn blowing 15-20 seconds prior to reaching a crossing (up to '/4 mile) pedestrian crossings and road crossings are included Continuously blow horn until train reaches crossing Quiet Zone Exempt Noises Crossing bells at every intersection One horn blast while arriving and leaving the station Horn blowing due to safety concerns as the engineer encounters them Wo Federal Railroad Administration's � View on Quiet Zones Safer to pursue a single joint quiet zone than multiple continuous quiet zones Limits potential confusion for engineer and the public SMART Policy on Quiet Zones Quiet zones will not be recognized until revenue service begins Expected start of revenue service is April 2017 Local Action on Quiet Zones Council/Board directed quiet zones in: Marin County, San Rafael, Novato, Petaluma and Santa Rosa Sonoma County has requested Rohnert Park and Cotati join it in forming a joint quiet zone 4 :; RR Crossings that affect Rohnert Park Quiet Zone Establishment Process Crossing diagnostic review (complete) Notice of Intent (or letter of support) Apply for approval of alternative safety measures (if necessary) Install all necessary and approved safety measures Submit a Notice of Quiet Zone Establishment 4 Crossing Diagnostic Review Conducted on October 17,2016 with CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission), FRA (Federal Railroad Administration), SMART (Sonoma -Marin Area Rail Transit), Sonoma County City of Cotati Sonoma County has conducted additional reviews of other crossings 4 Crossing Diagnostic Review Update existing FRA inventory forms Identified existing Supplemental Safety Measures (SSMs) and Alternative Safety Measures (ABMs) Identified additional SSMs and ASMs that would reduce risk in the quiet zone 4 Diagnostic Review Summary East Railroad Avenue eni Currently has 60' median ASM installed. Can request Approval by FRA or can change to SSM by Moving driveway and increasing median length to 100' Diagnostic Review Summary East Cotati Avenue Diagnostic Review Summary Southwest Blvd Diagnostic Review Summary 11% 1 r Diagnostic Review Summary Golf Course Drive Diagnostic Review Summary Estimated cost of Rohnert Park Improvements is $300,000 Alternative Safety Measure at Railroad Avenue requires an additional approval step Estimated schedule for establishment August 2017 (no alternative safety measures) May 2018 (with alternative safety measures) FRA Quiet Zone Calculator a Calculator establishes theQ uiet Zone Risk Index (QZRI) Calculator compares QZRI to two "base line" safety indexes National Significant Risl<Threshold (NSRT) Risk Index With Horns (RIWH) FRA Quiet Zone Calculator For a quiet zone to be approved the Quiet Zone Risk Index must be: lower than the National Significant Risk Threshold or lower than the Risk Index with Horns Calculator takes an average of the total zone, and does not base it on individual crossings Sonoma County's Approach Lower the risk index at each crossing to below both thresholds Limit any potential future liabilities by installing these SSMs 'N l FRA Quiet Zone Calculator - Current Configuration (No SSMs) Crossing IStreet (Traffic I Warning Device 498665X WEST ROBLES AVE. 1000 Gates 498670U TODD ROAD 900 Gates 498671E SCENIC AVE. 800 Gates 498673P GOLF COURSE DRIVE 7004 Gates 498674W ROHNERT PARK EXPY 10000 Gates 498675D SOUTHWEST BLVD 10000 Gates 498676K EAST COTATI AVE. 8080 Gates 4986775 EAST RAILROAD AVE 1400 Gates 498678Y OLD ADOBE ROAD 1900 Gates 498679F MAIN ST/WOODWARD 2500 Gates 498680A ELY ROAD N 900 Gates * Only Public At Grade Crossings are listed. Click for SUDdementary Safety Measures ISSN Click for ASM spreadsheet: ASM * Note:The use of ASMs requires an application to and approval from the FRA. 0 SSM Risk 0 12,456.52 MDDIFY 0 12,114.15 MQDIFY 0 14,404.82 MQDIFY 0 64,835.86 MQDIFY 0 63,422.42 MQDIFY 0 60,698.90 MQDIFY 0 24,515.72 MQDIFY 0 16,694.75 MQDIFY 0 17,354.96 h1QDIFY 0 18,624.87 1'r1ODIFY 0 14,270.72 MODIFY Summary Proposed Quiet Zone: Quiet Zone- 2nd Segment of Sonoma County- Cotatl-RP Type: New 24-hour QZ Scenario: QUIET ZONE -4917.3 Estimated Total Cost: X0.00 Nationwide Significant Risk Threshold: 14347 .00 Risk Index with Horns: 17407.55 Quiet Zone Risk Index: 29035.79 FRA Quiet Zone Calculator Summary of Quiet Zone Risk Index Options (Table 1) SSM Construction Options Current Configuration Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 West Robles Ave N y y y y Todd Road N y y y y Scenic Ave N y y y y Golf Course Drive N N N N N Rohnert Park Expressway N y y N N Southwest Blvd N y y y y East Cotati Ave N y y y y East Railroad Ave N y N N y Old Adobe Road N y y y y Main St/ Woodward N y y y y Ely Road N N y y y y Risk With Quiet Zone* 10,604 11,743 16,355 15,217 Risk Index with Horns** 17,407 17,407 17,407 17,407 17,407 *Supplemental and Alternative Safety Measures are infeasible on Golf Course Drive ** Lower score is less risk Note: Scenarios I and 2 put the proposed zone under both the Risk Index with Horns and the Nationwide Significant RiskThreshold of 14,347. Agreement with SMART g SMART will require an agreement for :o. q Liability Maintenance Indemnification Several Cities and Marin county are currently negotiating agreement with SMART Staff sees an advantage to working with the County to establish this agreement together with SMART 4 Summary There is some inherent risk and cost to establishing quiet zones There is also a strong consensus amongst other agencies to designate them The risk can be reduced with proper safety measures Pursuing a joint quiet zone has more benefits than pursuing one independently Staff recommendation Partner with Sonoma County joint for a quiet zone: Safer option than pursuing independently Likely to help with SMART agreement negotiations Has the most benefit to residents Next Steps Establish budget to pursue quiet zone and recommended supplemental safety measures Provide letter of support to County for joint quiet zone Continue to evaluate establishment process and agreement with SMART Questions? Backup SSM Examples An SSM is an FRA "p re -app roved" safety device that reduces the risk of vehicles crossing the tracks Median improvements 100' in length Channelization devices Extra quadrant gates ASM Examples An ASM needs to be approved by the FRA with an additional application Reduces risk of vehicles crossing tracks Shortened medians Could take an additional 8 to 10 months to get approval by FRA Crossing Diagnostic Review Review consists of public grade crossings Pedestrian crossings are considered "private", and are not reviewed for additional safety measure opportunities Ped crossings are not incorporated into the FRA calculator Copeland CreekTrail SSM Construction �r � Quiet zone scenarios indicate that Rohnert Park may not need to implement SSMs at both RPX and Southwest Blvd • There isn't clear information as to whether implementing all SSMs possible is advantageous to the City SSM Construction F Assume SSMs will have to be installed on RPX and Southwest Blvd for cost estimating purposes *Expected cost is around $300,000 Cost Breakdown Table 2 Projected Costs For SSM Installation & Quiet Zone Pursuit RPX Total Median Curb Perimeter 420 LF $ 32,634 Gravel fill 1000 SQ FT $ 14,000 Roll over curb for driveway 50 LF $ 3,675 Signage Placement 1 LS $ 1,200 Traffic Control 1 LS $ 5,000 Southwest Blvd Median Curb 420 LF $ 32,634 Concrete Fill 1025 SQ FT $ 16,144 Signage Placement 1 LS $ 1,200 Bollard Installation 6 EA $ 9,000 Traffic Control 1 LS $ 5,000 Construction Contingency 1 LS $ 60,243 Other Costs Construction Management 1 LS $ 6,024 SMART Encroachment Permit 1 LS $ 1,500 Inspections 1 LS $ 6,024 Staff Time $ 120 HR $ 18,720 Legal Review $ 1 LS $ 25,000 Reimbursement to Lead Agency $ 180 HR $ 7,200 Design 1 LS $ 20,000 Traffic Count 1 LS $ 3,300 Other contingency 1 LS $ 30,000 TOTAL $ 298,499 CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD ®ate: Agenda Item 1#: ! erne: L �'� 0 Address:(•/ TOPIC: I. N, U1 f / T "47> 17 Brief Summary of Comments: See Reverse 4 CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CART] -� Date: , Agenda item #: Name Address: Phare: TOPIC: ! Brief Summary of Comments:-� See Reverse CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD Date: Agenda Item M. =f Name:, Address: Phone: TOPIC: Brief Summary of COM"Wnts: See Reverse CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD Date: 7' . Agenda Item Name: Phone: — Brief Summary of Comments: see Reverse %.l I I 6-vulml n. arcmmcn I Anu I� bate:' 4/ Agenda,ltem #; Address, " Brief Summary of Comments. _SPP EiO vn ira Meeting Date: Department: Submitted By: Prepared By: Agenda Title: ITEM NO. 8 Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 22, 2016 Public Works and Community Development John McArthur, Director of Public Works and Community Development Maya Labourdette, Management Analyst Terrie Zwillinger, Project Coordinator Direction on Proposed Community Center Digital Sign Design and Use Policy RECOMMENDED ACTION: Provide direction to staff on proposals for the Community Center digital sign in regards to: 1. Options for New Sign Design, 2. Options for New Sign Frame and Monument Sign Design, and 3. Use Policy. BACKGROUND: On April 23, 2013, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing and approving the Digital Billboard Lease Agreement (Lease) by and between the City and Kirk Veale, dba Veale Outdoor Advertising (Veale), for the financing, installation, operation, and maintenance of the City's digital billboard adjacent to the Highway 101 freeway sign. The Lease included provisions to have Veale replace the manual (non -digital) message board at the Community Center Complex with a digital billboard sign. The construction and installation of the Community Center sign was to be at no cost to the City. Furthermore, the City was to receive the exclusive use of thirty-five percent (35%) of all advertising time in order to promote events and announcements that the City determined best to serve the needs of the City and its residents. Upon adoption of the Lease, City Council directed staff to proceed with exploring sign alternatives, but directed that it no longer wished to use the new sign for commercial advertising. Veale agreed to relinquish rights and responsibility of the Community Center sign, and make a payment of $50,000 to the City for the construction and installation of a new sign. The City would have exclusive use of the new Community Center sign and would be responsible for its construction, operation, and maintenance. Staff returned to the City Council on October 13, 2015 seeking direction on possible sign alternatives at the Community Center Complex. The options ranged from a small, single -faced digital sign that would display up to two lines of text and no graphics to a double sided, V- shaped digital sign with capacity to display text, photos and graphics. The costs ranged from no cost to the City (cost fit within Veale's $50,000 credit) to an estimated $77,000 net City cost. The City Council directed staff to design and install a dual -faced (V shaped) digital reader board with at least two lines of text that could be purchased within the $50,000 credit from Veale. City 1 ITEM NO. 8 Council selected this sign style because it fit within the budget provided by Veale and would have minimal operation and maintenance costs. During the discussion about the Community Center sign options, City Council also expressed interest in replacing the two monument signs located at the Community Center Complex. City Council directed staff to research the available options and costs to upgrade these signs. ANALYSIS: Upon receiving direction from Council on the Community Center sign design, staff engaged in the following three key tasks: 1. Renegotiated the Lease Agreement with Veale, 2. Entered into Agreement with YESCO LLC for construction and installation of a new Community Center sign, and 3. Held Public Outreach Meeting. Amendment to Lease Agreement with Veale: On July 12, 2016, the City Council adopted a resolution to execute a First Amendment to the Lease with Veale. Included in this First Amendment was an increase in the payment from Veale from $50,000 to $65,000 for the construction and installation of the Community Center sign. The First Amendment also relieved Veale of any additional responsibility for the Community Center sign and prohibited the City from using the sign to engage in commercial advertising. Community Center Digital Sign Option: On May 26, 2016, staff entered into agreement with YESCO LLC for the construction and installation of the new Community Center sign per City Council direction. YESCO has since provided the City with a new sign option that was not available when City Council first considered the sign choices. The sign proposed by YESCO LLC fits within the new amount provided by Veale and is of better quality than the type of signed previously presented to the City Council. The new sign option is a dual -faced (V shaped), full color, LED display sign with the capacity for graphic animation (similar to the Highway 101 sign). The sign can also be programmed to display text only, if so desired. The size of the sign would be essentially the same as the sign originally selected by City Council (see Table 1 on the following page). The cost of the new sign would be $49,882.22, well within the available funds from Veale. The new sign would cost more in annual operation and maintenance (see Table 1 on the following page); however, staff believes the enhanced graphic quality would entice more organizations to promote community events on the sign, which could generate enough additional revenue to offset the increased maintenance costs. 2 ITEM NO. 8 Table 1: Comparison of Estimated Operation and Maintenance Costs Sign Type/Size Yesco Service Agreement $/yr Electrical $/yr Wireless Comm. $/yr City Labor $/yr* Total $/yr SELECTED BY CITY COUNCIL 10/25/15 Small single faced sign N/A $500 N/A $5,300 $5,800 2 -line digital text only Size: TV x 8'4" YESCO'S NEW PROPOSED SIGN Double-faced sign $6,500 $1,800 N/A N/A $8,300 2 -line digital text only Size: 3'0" x 8'1" *Note: City labor based on a Maintenance Worker Il ($55.44/hr top step weighted hourly rate) performing an estimated 8 hours a month of work. Operation and Maintenance costs would increase from an estimated $5,800/year to $8,300/year with the new LED -style sign due mainly to the addition of a yearly maintenance agreement with YESCO. The maintenance agreement is not required, but is recommended because it includes replacement of defective wiring within the display, defective ballasts, defective LEDs, and thorough cleaning of the electronic display every 12 months. Staff is not as proficient in the newer LED technology, so it would be more efficient to contract out the maintenance of the sign. Staff has carefully considered the two sign options, and even with the additional annual operation and maintenance costs, is recommending the new proposed sign due to the benefits that come from the sign's improved technical quality and capacity. The benefits include greater marketing and promotional opportunities, and even the potential to generate additional revenue through the promotion of certain events and productions by outside organizations. Public Outreach Meeting: On August 22, 2016, a public meeting was held to discuss the Community Center sign project with residents and solicit comments and/or concerns. Five residents attended the meeting and they voiced some concerns about the proposed sign, mainly around the potential safety risk of distracted drivers. There was also a concern about the increased brightness of the sign. At the end of the meeting, consensus was expressed that if a digital sign were to be placed in the existing sign location, they would be in favor of one that consisted of just text and not a sign with animation or pictures. The notes from this meeting are included as Attachment 1. Staff has carefully considered the public comments and has reviewed research on the issue of digital billboards and distracted driving. According to a publication released by the U.S. Department of Transportation in 2011, multiple studies on the subject did not "demonstrate that the advertising signs detracted from driver's glances forward at the roadway or at traffic control devices"; however, studies have "demonstrated that signs showing moving video or other dynamic elements may draw attention away from the roadway" (www.fbwa.dot.gov). The proposed Community Center sign would have digital text and static images, but would not have animation or moving video that has been shown to be distracting. The Community Center sign would also function quite differently than the 101 billboard sign which is owned and operated by Veale. The primary purpose of the 101 digital sign is for commercial advertising; therefore, the 101 sign displays as many advertisements as possible (one every six seconds) to 3 ITEM NO. 8 maximize revenue. The proposed Community Center sign would function much like a static billboard and be used primarily to promote City events and public services announcements. Furthermore, it would have the following features to minimize distraction: 1. Considerably longer display times (3-5 minutes for each display), 2. Automatic dimming as daylight decreases, and 3. Automatic shutdown during late night hours (such as from IOpm to 6am). Therefore, based on the research and features of the proposed Community Center sign, staff does not believe it would pose a significant distraction to drivers or a nuisance to residents. Community Center Sign Frame and Monument Sign Design: Along with purchasing and installing a new Community Center digital sign, the City will have the opportunity to choose its preferred design for the sign's frame. The cost of the frame is included in the proposal from YESCO. Staff has reviewed the choices for frame design concepts and has selected three recommended sign alternatives for City Council review and direction. Photos of these sign options are included as Attachment 2. City Council has also previously expressed interest in replacing the monument signs at the Community Center Complex and has since directed staff to pursue options. There are two monument signs at the Community Center Complex; one sign is located at the entrance to the Sports Center (north) parking lot off of Rohnert Park Expressway; the other sign is at the entrance to the PAC as approached from Snyder Lane. Depending on the type of monument sign selected, the total estimated cost for replacing the two monument signs is $50,000480,000 ($25,000-$40,000 each). Although, the monument signs cannot be replaced with funding from Veale, staff still recommends that the City Council selects a design option at this time. This would give the City the opportunity to coordinate the design concept for the frame of the Community Center digital sign with new monument signs to improve promotional capabilities and City branding at the Community Center Complex. Attachment 3 contains three monument sign alternatives for City Council review. Staff would then implement the monument sign replacement project when funding became available. Community Center Sign Use Policy: The Lease with Veale for the Highway 101 digital billboard stipulates that 10 percent of the total advertising time will be allocated for City usage. The City currently has a Digital Billboard Use Policy that was implemented to direct the City's usage of this advertising time. The First Amendment to the Lease states that the City will have exclusive use of the Community Center sign to use for community events and general public interest notifications, but not for commercial advertising. Staff is proposing that the City create a new policy to govern the Community Center sign, rather than amending the current Digital Billboard Use Policy. This would ensure maximum flexibility in policy design and provide more clarity in the ways the two signs will operate. The Community Center sign policy would prohibit commercial advertising per the Lease with Veale. It would also define community events and general public interest notifications which would likely include the following: 1. Community Events Sponsored by City and/or Local Non -Profit Organizations: these would include events that: a) Promote the community, 2 ITEM NO. 8 b) Are of a civic, public or educational nature, c) Are made available to the general public; 2. Productions at the Performing Arts Center; 3. Public Safety Alerts and Service Announcements; 4. Other City Alerts and Public Service Announcements (e.g. water conservation measures or public meetings); 5. Local Public Educational Institution Announcements. The Community Center sign policy could limit use by local non-profit organizations to a certain percentage of the sign's operational time. Staff recommends capping 15 percent of the sign's operational time for local non-profit organizations, so that 85 percent of the operational time is available for the City's use of the sign. Staff recommends that the policy retains a fee for promoting non-profit events, but this fee could be reduced to 50 percent of the amount charged for advertising on the 101 Digital Billboard. Therefore, non-profit charitable organizations would be charged $50 per week, $20 for weekend only, or $12 per day (minimum 2 days) to promote events on the Community Center digital sign. This minimal fee would help offset the cost of providing administrative staff time for formatting and loading graphic displays on the sign. Additionally, the City might also want to consider allowing renters of the Community Center and/or PAC facilities who plan to hold an event open to community members, to promote their events on the Community Center sign. The City could implement a new fee for promoting these events on the Community Center sign which could be added to the Recreation and Facility Program Fee Schedule. This fee could be a flat rate that could be added to the facility rental fee or a percentage amount of the facility rental fee. Either way, it could be a new source of revenue for the City. Summary: In summary, there have been some key developments since staff received original direction from City Council on the Community Center sign options. The prices of digital signs have decreased, sign technology has improved, and the City has an additional $15,000 in funds from Veale to construct and install the sign. This presents an opportunity for the City to maximize the quality and capability of the sign and to choose a frame option that could coordinate with new monument signs to update and re -brand the Community Center Complex. The careful development a use policy for the new sign could potentially support the higher operation and maintenance costs associated with the improved sign option. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: The Project involves replacement of existing facility equipment and there is no expansion of the existing use. Therefore, the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) of CEQA Guidelines. (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15301, 15302). 5 ITEM NO. 8 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: The Community Center sign design and use policy is in alignment with GOAL C: Ensure the effective delivery of public services and GOAL D: Continue to Develop a Vibrant Community. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: (list however many are appropriate) Community Center Sign Design: Recommended Option: The type of sign with only two lines of dot-matrix type text that the City Council approved in October 2015 has become obsolete as technology continues to change. Staff recommends the approval of the proposed LED digital sign design from YESCO because it provides a more robust sign that still fits within the credit from Veale. Staff can program the sign to display text only (if needed), but would have the capability to program advertisements with graphics if desired. Although the yearly operation and maintenance costs would increase from what was previously proposed with the new sign, the costs could be recovered through the revenues received from advertising. Installing a new Community Center sign also creates an opportunity to select the monument signs located at the Community Center Complex for an updated and coordinated re -branding effort. Staff recommends this option. 2. Alternative: Staff also considered the construction of the originally approved dot-matrix sign; however after discussions with YESCO, it has been found that the dot-matrix type signs are essentially obsolete and would not provide benefit to the City related to cost, other than reduced operation and maintenance costs. However, the anticipated revenue from advertising sales should offset the operation and maintenance costs associated with the new proposed sign. Therefore, staff does not recommend this option. 3. Alternative: The City could also choose not to construct a new Community Center sign and instead rely on the old marque and vinyl banners. However, the City would not be able improve promotional capability for City events and public service announcements nor utilize Veale's credit. Therefore, staff does not recommend this option. Community Center Sign Use Policy: Recommended Option: A new use policy could be created to govern the usage of the Community Center sign. This would be a separate policy from the Digital Billboard Use Policy for the digital billboard adjacent to Highway 101. Establishing separate policies for the two billboards would allow for maximum flexibility in policy design and mitigate possible confusion over the operation of the two distinctly different signs. Establishing a percentage of display time and reducing fees for non-profit organizations would give them much greater promotional opportunities for community events. Allowing renters of the Community Center and/or PAC to promote their events on the Community Center sign could also bring additional revenue to the City. Staff recommends this option. 2. Alternative: Staff also considered amending the current Digital Billboard Use Policy to include the guidelines for the Community Center sign. However, since the two signs have distinct operating differences, combining all the policy and procedural information for the usage of both signs into one policy had the potential for confusion for both staff and advertisers. Therefore, staff does not recommend this option. on ITEM NO. 8 FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: At the October 2015 meeting, the City Council chose a small, double-faced sign with two lines of text (no graphics) because it fit within the budget provided by Veale and would have minimal operation and maintenance costs. While the cost of the new sign in YESCO's bid increased from the original estimated cost, it still fits within the credit amount from Veale. Veale will pay the City up to $65,000 for the installation and construction of the sign and YESCO's bid for the new proposed sign is $49,882.22. The estimated construction costs to provide electrical service to the new sign have decreased considerably. Originally, staff projected an electrical install cost of $12,000. However, staff has now determined that only minor improvements are needed and the electrical project can be completed by Public Work's staff within the FY 2016-17 available department budget. Operation and Maintenance costs would increase from $5,800/year to $8,300/year with the new sign due mainly to the addition of a yearly maintenance agreement with YESCO. The proposed Community Center sign use policy may increase revenue to the City via the advertising of community events hosted by non-profit organizations. Should City Council direct staff to allow renters of the Community Center and/or PAC to also advertise community events, then there will likely be additional revenue generated by the operation of the Community Center sign. This additional revenue could be used to offset the yearly operation and maintenance costs of the sign. If City Council chooses to move forward with replacing the two monument signs at the Community Center Complex, the cost would range from $50,000-$80,000. This project is not currently budgeted, and therefore a funding source would need to be identified. Department Head Approval Date: 11/2/2016 (J. McArthur) Finance Director Approval Date: N/A (B. Howze) City Attorney Approval Date: N/A (K. Murphy) City Manager Approval Date: 11/10/16 (D. Jenkins) Attachments (list in packet assembly order): 1. Notes from Public Outreach Meeting 2. Options for Frame Design 3. Options for Monument Signs 7 Attachment 1 Proposed Community Center Complex Digital Sign Public Meeting, August 22, 2016 at 6:OOpm at Community Center Presenters: John McArthur and Terrie Zwillinger Attendees: 5 residents (plus 2 children). One of the residents lives on Jasmine and his house backs up to Snyder. Purpose of the meeting was to solicit comments and/or concerns about the new digital sign that is proposed to replace the existing static sign at the Community Center Comments/Concerns: • Is the sign going to generate revenue? • Do not want casino advertisement • Do not want big gaudy sign • Did the City look at other sites in town to put the sign? • Who determines the location of the sign? • How much brighter is the proposed sign going to be than the current sign? • Will the sign be turned off at a designated time? • The sign is going to reduce home values in the area • There were many trees removed with the road project — will any of them be replanted? • Can trees be planted behind the homes adjacent to Snyder? That would help block the brightness of the digital sign • Has the City considered the safety of drivers? The sign is just another distraction for drivers. • There are high school kids in the area • Some states have banned digital signs/billboards. Have you researched that? • Did the city contact other areas where signs were installed and ask for their pre and post installation accident data? Did other communities have safety issues? The sign will cause accidents. • Residents want a crosswalk at Jasmine Circle and RPX • The City should spend money on stop signs and not this project • Is the crosswalk at Snyder and Copeland creek going to be a lighted crosswalk? • Is the crosswalk at Medical Center Drive and Snyder going to be a lighted crosswalk? • When is the striping for the crosswalks on Snyder going to be completed? • The City should not construct this project until the crosswalks are installed • What will the refresh rate of the sign? It should be slow enough so people are not distracted by it going to the next ad too fast • Will the fees generated from ads on the sign be used for anything? They should be used for specific things • The participants agreed that if a digital sign were to be constructed, they would prefer a sign with only text and not a TV type with animation or pictures Attachment 2 Frame Oations for Citv Council Consideration: Text: City Council can choose the text to be displayed on the sign. For example, text can state City of Rohnert Park, Spreckels Performing Arts Center, or Community Center Complex. Color Options: Frame color can be selected from the City's color palette. The following page demonstrates the Community Center digital sign option as well as the City of Rohnert Park's color palette. I Attachment 3 Monument Sign Alternatives for City Council Consideration: Text: City Council can choose the text to be displayed on the sign. For example, text can state City of Rohnert Park, Spreckels Performing Arts Center, or Community Center Complex. Color Options: Frame color can be selected from the City's color palette. The following page demonstrates the Community Center digital sign option as well as the City of Rohnert Park's color palette. Ifs - .. T' rML- Community Center Complex Sign Design & Use Policy November 229 2016 wu weir S Pritf"o3EHIt4M ARTS erNTF °` R{7HP�EiiT PA K Presenters: John McArthur, Director of Public Works and Community Services Maya Labourdette, Management Analyst Background Steps Tal<en to Date: First Amendment to Lease with Veale Public Outreach Meeting Agreement for New Sign Construction and Installation Direction on New Digital Sign Option Direction on Monument Sign Options Direction on New Digital Sign Use Policy Next Steps Highway 101 Digital Billboard Sign Master Lease Agreement between City &Veale City Council approved April 23, 2013 Provisions forVeale to replace existing Community Center sign with new sign Veale to contribute up to $50,000 to City for new sign o City responsible for sign operation and maintenance background City Council Direction on Community Center Complex Sign Options Staff presented sign options on October 13, 2015 City Council directed staff to install a dual -faced digital reader board sign Cost to remain under $50,000 City Council also directed staff to research replacement of monument signs �iteps ato Date - Renegotiated Lease with Veale Public Outreach Meeting Entered into agreement to construct and install new Community Center sign First Amendment to Lease with Veale City Council approved First Amendment on July 12, 2016 City responsible for purchase, installation and operation of new Community Center Complex digital sign Veale to increase payment from $50,000 to $65,000 Digital sign would not be used for commercial advertising Public Outreach Meeting Meeting held on August 22, 2016 Five residents attended and expressed concerns about: Safety risk due to distracted drivers Brightness of sign Hours of use -rublic Outreach Meeting Response to Concerns: Multiple studies demonstrate that digital signs, without animation or moving video, do not distract drivers Community Center Sign would have: No animation or video Automatic dimming as daylight decreases Long advertisement display times (3-5 minutes) Limited hours of operation during nighttime Ow Original Sign Option F -I ► Dual -faced, LED digital display ► Full graphic capability ► Can be programmed for text only, if desired ► 3'0"x8'1" r Cost $50,000 Note: Existing sign is 6' x 10' ► Graphic Display Utilizes latest technology Enhanced promotional opportunities Cost is lower than previously presented Credit from Veale is sufficient for new sign option plus contingency D Sign Type Sign Selected by City Council October 2015 YESCO'S New Proposed Sign Optio Yesco Service Agreement $/yr Estimated Electrical City Labor Total $ /yr $ /yr $ /yr New Digital Sign Option City Council Direction: A) Original Digital Sign Option B) New Digital Sign Option New [digital sign frame Options Text & Logo Options: City of Rohnert Park Spreckels Performing Arts Center Community Center Complex Other New Digital sign frame Options Color Options: Frame color can be selected from City's color palette Primary Colors M Secondary Colors a Extended Colors New Digital Sign Option City Council Direction, Frame Options: text and color Rohnert Park Expressway _ Community enter ------ Sports Center PerformingArts Center - �a _ _ y IY0 Snyder Lane _ �/�� * _ t �� •.7%.6'�.k �• „it ;..fir f r r i 54u7 ' 5445 Community Center ' Sports Center ` #_A - Performing Arts Center ' —z" IY0 Community Center Complex - Monument Sign Options - -_` 5409 SPRECKFIS ,..,, FeTfcrMM' glkrks Oenter Estimated Cost: $25,000 - $40,000 each sign Size: — 4' x 10' i ea Community Center Complexm Monument Sign Options City Council Direction: A) Select monument sign style and construct when funding is identified B) Postpone selection until funding is identified and project is budgeted Community Center Digital Sign Use Policy City's Existing Digital Billboard Use Policy for Hwy 10 I Digital Sign Directs City's usage of Hwy 101 digital billboard City currently receives 10% of advertising time Community Center Digital Sign Use Policy Staff recommends developing new policy for Community Center Complex digital sign Prohibit commercial advertising Define acceptable sign uses: Community events sponsored by City or local non -profits Productions at Spreckels Performing Arts Center Public Safety and other City alerts and service announcements Local public educational institution announcements Community Center Digital Sign Use Policy Policy could also include: Limitation of use by outside organizations Establishment of fees for promoting events by local non -profits Establishment of fees for renters of Community Center or PAC to promote events open to community members Community Center Digital Sign Use Policy City Council Direction: A) Create separate policy to guide sign usage or amend current Hwy 101 Digital Billboard Use Policy? B) Limitation on use by outside organizations? 85% City Use 15% Local Non Profits C) Establish fees for local non-profit events? Set at 50% of fees for Highway 101 digital billboard sign D) Allow renters of Community Center and/or PAC to promote events on sign for a fee? Based on City Council direction, staff would: Proceed with site plan and architectural review with Planning Commission Proceed with construction and installation of new Community Center digital sign Proceed with identifying possible funding sources for replacement of monument signs (if desired) Develop policy (or amend policy) to guide Community Center digital sign usage Return to City Council for review and approval of new (or amended) policy ROj;NEFLT TA 1{ �R7,iF(33�"�71P- ITEM NO. 9 Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November 22, 2016 Department: Administration Submitted By: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk Prepared By: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk Agenda Title: Selection of City Council Officers for 2017 - Consideration of Nomination and Selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor RECOMMENDED ACTION: Select the Mayor and Vice Mayor for one (1) year terms commencing at the first regular meeting in December 2016. BACKGROUND: City Council Protocols section I.H.3 states, "The Mayor and Vice Mayor will be elected by three (3) affirmative votes of the City Council. In years when members of the City Council are to be elected, the City Council shall consider the election of a Mayor and Vice Mayor for one (1) year terms at the first regular meeting after certification of the general election results has been received by the City. In years when no members of the City Council are to be elected, the City Council shall consider the election of the Mayor and Vice Mayor for one (1) year terms at the second regular meeting in November of each year or no later than the succeeding meeting." ANALYSIS: The 2016 General Municipal Election was cancelled per Resolution 2016-85. Therefore, certification of the general election results will not be received by the City. The Mayor and Vice Mayor will be elected by three (3) affirmative votes of the City Council. The City Council shall consider the election of the Mayor and Vice Mayor for one (1) year terms at the second regular meeting in November of each year. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This item aligns with the City's Strategic Plan Goal A & C by facilitating participative leadership at all levels while also ensuring the effective delivery of public services. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: Staff recommends nomination and selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor. No other options were considered as these actions are initiated by the City Council Protocols. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: None. Department Head Approval Date: NA City Manager Approval Date: 11/14/2016 Finance Director Approval Date: NA City Attorney Approval Date: NA Attachments (list in packet assembly order): City Council Protocols Section I.H.3. 2 ITEM NO. 9 3. Election of Council Officers The Mayor and Vice Mayor will be elected by three (3) affirmative votes of the City Council. In years when members of the City Council are to be elected, the City Council shall consider the election of a Mayor and Vice Mayor for one (1) year terms at the first regular meeting after certification of the general election results has been received by the City. In years when no members of the City Council are to be elected, the City Council shall consider the election of the Mayor and Vice Mayor for one (1) year terms at the second regular meeting in November of each year or no later than the succeeding meeting. I. Attendance by the Public Except as specifically provided by law for closed sessions, all meetings of the Council will be open and public in accordance with the terms, provisions and exceptions consistent with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code sections 54950, et seq.). J. Agenda Packets The City Council agenda packet, including all reports, communications, ordinances, resolutions, contracts, documents, or other matters to be considered by the City Council at the regular meeting, will be delivered to members of the City Council no later than the Thursday preceding the Tuesday Council meeting to which the agenda packet pertains. Friday delivery is allowed with City Manager approval. The agenda packet will be made available for public inspection upon its distribution to the City Council. Any writings or documents subject to disclosure that are provided to all, or a majority of all, of the members of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda has been distributed will also be made available for public inspection at City Hall during normal business hours. K. Action Minutes Minutes of Council meetings will be action minutes. Action minutes will include final motions and will note for the record how each Councilmember voted. The minutes will also reflect the names of public speakers. Council and staff discussion and comments will not be included in the minutes. The City Clerk will have exclusive responsibility for preparation of the minutes and directions for corrections to the minutes will be made only by majority vote of the City Council. 1. Written Comments for the Record Written comments by a Councilmember may be read "for the record" and submitted to the City Clerk to be placed on file with archives of agenda items and, if requested, attached to the original set of minutes. 2. Reading, of the Minutes Unless the reading of the minutes of a Council meeting is ordered by a majority vote of the Council, the minutes may be approved without reading if the City Clerk has previously furnished each Councilmember with a copy. City Council Protocols Amended 3/10/2015 by Reso. No. 2015-047 1343373v1A 80078/0012 Page 3 of 27 ROj;NEFLT TA 1{ �R7,iF(33�"�71P- ITEM NO. 10 Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November 22, 2016 Department: Development Services Submitted By: Mary Grace Pawson PE, Director of Development Services Prepared By: Mary Grace Pawson PE, Director of Development Services Agenda Title: Consideration of a Resolution Establishing and Setting a Schedule for Water Capacity Charges under the Mitigation Fee Act (Exempt from CEQA Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Resolution Establishing and Setting a Schedule for Water Capacity Charges under the Mitigation Fee Act. BACKGROUND: The City has captured the majority of its development impact fees in its Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), a nexus study that complies with the requirements of Government Code Section 66000 and lays out the reasonable relationship between the City's fees and the impacts of new development. The PFFP covers all infrastructure required to support new development with the exception of water supply (both groundwater and the Sonoma County Water Agency supply) and storage tanks. The City currently has two fees associated with water for new development, its "Per Acre Development Fee", established in 1972 and most recently updated in 1998 by Resolution Number 98-22 and its "Water and Wastewater Conservation Fee," adopted in 1998 by Resolution Number 98-26. The purpose of the proposed Water Capacity Charge is to replace these fees with a new charge that is calculated based on the new development currently planned by the City and the water supply infrastructure necessary to serve that development. ANALYSIS: The City's authority to impose capacity charges is outlined in the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000). The Mitigation Fee Act requires that when a local agency, such as the City, imposes fees for water connections or sewer connections, or imposes capacity charges, those fees or charges shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge is imposed (Government Code Section 66013). The current fees are grounded in an engineering report from 1979, which calculated the fees by dividing the cost of anticipated improvements over the anticipated land use pattern at the time (1979). The anticipated improvements included improvements to the City's well -field, several new tanks and a new sewer line. While these fees were updated to account for inflation from time to time, with the most recent update being 1998, the underlying land uses and anticipated improvements have not changed from the 1979 report. In order to update the fee, staff worked with GHD Inc. to develop an updated Water Capacity Charge Analysis (Resolution Exhibit A), which is based on current land uses and water supply and storage needs. ITEM NO. 10 The land uses in the Water Capacity Charge Analysis are based on the City's current General Plan, including the amendments for the University District, Southeast, Wilfred Dowdell and Northwest Specific Plan Areas (SPAs), the Stadium Lands and Sonoma Mountain Village Planned Development Areas (PDs) and the Central Rohnert Park Priority Development Area. The improvements included in the Water Capacity Charge analysis include: • buy -in to the City's existing well field, which will provide capacity for new development • a fair share allocation of the Sonoma County Water Agency's planned supply improvements, which will provide capacity for new development; and • the five (5) new storage tanks that are required by the environmental documents for the various SPAS and PDs. The sewer facilities that were included in the 1979 engineering report are not included in the current study because the Public Facilities Finance Plan includes all sewer facilities needed for new development. The proposed capacity charges will result in new development supporting its share of the City's existing well field and the Sonoma County Water Agency supply. The proposed capacity charges will also provide a clear mechanism for multiple developers to share the costs of required storage tanks, with development served by each storage tank paying its proportionate share of the cost of that tank. Because the land uses and anticipated improvements have been updated, and the sewer facilities have been removed, the proposed Water Capacity Charges generally result in slightly lower fees for planned development than the prior two fees. As the two fees were enacted to fund some improvements that are part of the current analysis, any remaining revenue in the funds is proposed to be transferred to the Water Capacity Charge fund. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Council's action to establish Water Capacity Charges is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b) (3) because it is a means of mitigating potential environmental impacts which have been identified in environmental analyses of other planning efforts, specifically the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and the EIRs for the various SPAS and PDs. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: 1. Approve the Resolution establishing a Water Capacity Charge schedule (recommended action). This option will result in a new fee program with a clear nexus to the water supply and storage facilities necessary to serve new development. It provides the development community with a way to share the costs of storage tanks that benefit multiple properties, it provides the City with a funding source to construct facilities as needed for development and it generally results in slightly lower costs for developers than the current programs. 2. Do not approve the Resolution establish the Water Capacity Charge schedule. This option, which is not recommended, would leave the current "Per Acre Fee" and "Water/Wastewater Conservation Fee" programs in place. These existing programs require an update and generally result in higher costs to the development community. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This action is consistent with Strategic Plan Goal C (ensure effective delivery of public services) and Strategic Plan Goal D (continue to develop a vibrant community). This action provides for the timely construction of infrastructure and a fair -share cost allocation between new and existing development. 2 ITEM NO. 10 FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: The recommended action will have a positive fiscal impact for the City. By establishing the Water Capacity Charge program, the City will have a current capacity charge program designed to ensure that new development pays its appropriate share of the existing and planned water supply and storage system. The proposed capacity charge system includes an allowance for the administration of this new program which further mitigates potential fiscal impacts. Consistent with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act, proceeds from capacity charge revenue will be deposited in a dedicated account. That account will provide the funding source for improvements authorized under this capacity charge program. Department Head Approval Date: 10/04/2016 Finance Director Approval Date: 10/17/2016 City Attorney Approval Date: 11/09/2016 City Manager Approval Date: 11/14/2016 Attachments: 1. Resolution Establishing and Setting a Water Capacity Charge Schedule under the Mitigation Fee Act 2. Resolution Exhibit A — Water Capacity Charge Analysis 3. Resolution Exhibit B — Water Capacity Charge Schedule 4. Letter to Interested Parties RESOLUTION NO. 2016-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ESTABLISHING AND SETTING A SCHEDULE FOR WATER CAPACITY CHARGES UNDER THE MITIGATION FEE ACT WHEREAS, the General Plan of the City of Rohnert Park requires that new development pay its proportionate share of the cost of capital improvements made necessary by that new development; and WHEREAS, the City's existing water supply, including its groundwater well field and its Sonoma County Water Agency supply, provide capacity that benefits new development; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Reports approved for the specific plan areas and planned development areas within the City require the construction of water storage tanks to mitigate the impacts of new development; and WHEREAS, the City's existing water fee programs, including its "Per Acre Fee" program and its "Water/Wastewater Conservation Fee," were last updated in 1998 and require an update; and WHEREAS, Exhibit A which is attached to this Resolution is a financial analysis that provides documentation of the costs of the water supply and storage infrastructure and an allocation of those costs to all benefitting parties including new development within the City; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing before the City Council on this adoption of the Water Capacity Charge schedule was published twice in the newspaper for at least ten (10) days pursuant to Government Code Section 6062(a) and was mailed to interested persons who requested the information fourteen (14) days in advance; WHEREAS, the analysis in Exhibit A was made available for public review for at least fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing on this Resolution; and WHEREAS, on November 22, 2016 the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park conducted a duly noticed public hearing to receive and consider public comments on the staff report and presentation regarding the establishment of the Water Capacity Charge Schedule and the analysis included in Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it does hereby authorize and approve: 1. Findings. The City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference complies with California Government Code Section 66013 by establishing the facilities and infrastructure it describes provide benefit to the persons and property being charged. B. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to fund water supply and storage systems and improvements as described in Exhibit A. C. After considering the specific infrastructure systems and cost estimates identified in Exhibit A, the City Council approves such descriptions and cost estimates, and finds them reasonable as the basis for calculating and imposing the Water Capacity Charge. D. The infrastructure systems and upgrades and charge methodology identified in Exhibit A are consistent with the City's General Plan, including recent updates to the General Plan, because it implements the General Plan policy that requires that new development pay its proportionate share of the cost of capital improvements made necessary by that new development. E. The Water Capacity Charge is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines section 15061(b) (3). The intent of the Water Capacity Charge is to provide one means of mitigating potential environmental impacts which have been identified in environmental analyses of other planning efforts, including the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. 2. Establishment of Fee; Schedule. The Water Capacity Charge for various parcels within the City is hereby established and set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. The parcels all have identical land use in the City's General Plan including recent updates to the General Plan. In the future, the General Plan Land Use Framework should be consulted as necessary to support accurate determination of fees. 3. Use of Fee. The funds generated by the imposition of the Water Capacity Charge shall be solely used: (a) for the purposes described in Exhibit A; (b) for reimbursing the City for the development's fair share of those costs already incurred by the City as a result of the development; or (c) for reimbursing developers who funded infrastructure in the Water Capacity Charge program beyond that needed to mitigate the impacts of the developers' project or projects. The Water Capacity Charges shall be deposited, accounted for, and expended in accordance with Government Code Section 66006 and all other applicable provisions of law. 4. Automatic Increase. The Water Capacity Charges shall automatically increase on July 1 in each year hereafter in accordance with any increases in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for the San Francisco Bay Area in the twelve months from April 1 of the fiscal year preceding said July 1 and March 30 of the fiscal year ending on such July 1. 5. Fee Review. Annually, as part of the budget process, the City Manager shall review the estimated cost of the water supply and storage facilities, the continued need for these facilities and the reasonable relationship between such need and the impacts of the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which this fee is charged. The City Manager shall report his or her findings to the City Council at a noticed public meeting and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 6. Repeal of Previous Fees. Upon the effective date of this Resolution, Resolution 98-22 which established the City's "Per Acre Fee" and Resolution 98-26, which established the 2 2016-112 City's "Water/Wastewater Conservation Fee", are repealed and staff is directed to transfer any revenue in these fee funds to the Water Capacity Charge fund. 7. Judicial Action to Challenge this Resolution. Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of the date of adoption of this resolution. 8. Severability. If any provision or clause, or paragraph of this resolution or the imposition of the Water Capacity Charge for any project within the City or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this resolution or other fees levied by this resolution which can be given effect without the invalid provisions or application of fees, and to this end the provisions of the resolution are declared to be severable. 9. Administration. The Water Capacity Charge program shall be administered in accordance with procedures outlined in Section 3.28 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code, except that the Water Capacity Charges shall be deposited in a dedicated account and shall not be comingled with the Public Facilities Fee Fund. The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to take the actions necessary to effectuate the administration of the Water Capacity Charge Fund. 10. Further Actions. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute documents pertaining to this Resolution and the Water Capacity Charge program for and on behalf of the City of Rohnert Park. 11. Effective Date. Pursuant to Government Code 60017, this Resolution shall take effect sixty (60) days after its adoption. 12. Recitals. The recitals to this Resolution are true and correct and material to the adoption of this Resolution. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 22nd day of November, 2016. ATTEST: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Gina Belforte, Mayor Attachments: Exhibit A and Exhibit B AHANOTU: CALLINAN: STAFFORD: MACKENZIE: BELFORTE: AYES:( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT:( ) ABSTAIN: ( ) 3 2016-112 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charge Analysis October 2016 City Of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charcle Analvsis i Contents ExecutiveSummary ...................................................................................................1 ES.1 Introduction and Purpose....................................................................................1 ES.2 Structure of the Analysis......................................................................................1 ES.3 Land Uses Included in the Analysis.....................................................................2 ESA Capital Facilities Included in the Analysis............................................................2 ES.5 Summary of Benefit Analysis for the Capital Facilities.........................................4 ES.6 Allocation of Capacity Charges............................................................................5 ES.7 Summary of Cost -Allocation and Capacity Charges............................................6 ES.8 Approval Process and Annual Updates.............................................................11 1. Authority and Methodology..............................................................................12 1.1 Authority...........................................................................................................12 1.2 Methodology.....................................................................................................12 IncrementalCost Method................................................................................................................13 SystemBuy -In Method...................................................................................................................13 Combined Method — Future System Buy-In....................................................................................13 Land Uses & Basis of Cost Estimates......................................................................15 1.3 Introduction.......................................................................................................15 1.4 Existing and General Plan Proposed Land Uses...............................................15 1.5 Adjustments for Paid Fees................................................................................17 Sonoma Mountain Village Payments..............................................................................................18 Stadium Lands, Wilfred Dowdell and University District Payments................................................20 1.6 Growth Management and Absorption Rates.....................................................20 1.7 Basis of Cost Estimates....................................................................................21 1.8 Land Acquisition, Rights -of -Way and Environmental Mitigation Costs...............22 2. Water System Facilities................................................................................... 23 2.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................23 2,2 Water Facilities Description...............................................................................23 GroundwaterSupply.......................................................................................................................24 RecycledWater Supply..................................................................................................................25 October 2016 City Of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charcle Analvsis Sonoma County Water Agency Supply...........................................................................................26 Capital Improvements for Water Supply.........................................................................................29 Capital Improvements for Common Transmission Facilities...........................................................30 Capital Improvements for Transmission and Storage Facilities on the Petaluma Aqueduct and Russian River — Cotati Intertie................................................................................30 Summary of Improvements to Agency System...............................................................................30 WaterDistribution System..............................................................................................................31 Summary of Water System Improvements and Costs....................................................................32 2.3 Method for Allocating Costs.............................................................................. 32 Conservationin the UWMP............................................................................................................34 Accounting for Conservation in the Capacity Charge Program.......................................................35 IrrigationAccounts..........................................................................................................................37 Accounting for Water Recycling......................................................................................................37 Water Demand Factors for the Capacity Charge Program.............................................................38 2.4 Fee Component Calculations............................................................................40 GroundwaterSupply.......................................................................................................................40 Sonoma County Water Agency Supply...........................................................................................41 Distribution System Improvements.................................................................................................45 2.5 Summary..........................................................................................................46 2.6 Administrative Allowance..................................................................................47 2.7 Government Code Section 66013 Findings for Water System Improvements...................................................................................................48 Definitionof Benefit.........................................................................................................................48 Facilities that Provide Benefit.........................................................................................................48 Cost of the Facilities that Provide Benefit.......................................................................................49 List of Tables Table 1 — Summary Cost Estimate and Allocation................................................................3 Table 2 — Water Use Factors for New and Existing Development........................................6 Table 3 — Proposed Water Capacity Charge Components...................................................7 Table 4 — Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Infill (2016-17) ..........................................7 Table 5 — Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Northeast SPA (2016-17) ........................8 Table 6 — Proposed Water Capacity Charges for University District SPA (2016-17) ............ 8 Table 7 — Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Southeast SPA (2016-17) .......................9 Table 8 — Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Sonoma Mountain Village PD (2016-17).......................................................................................................9 October 2016 City Of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis Table 9 — Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Northwest SPA (2016-17) .......... Table 10 — Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Wilfred Dowdell SPA (2016-17) Table 11 — Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Stadium Lands PD (2016-17)... Table 12 — Land Uses in the Water Capacity Charge Program ............................... Table 13 — Sonoma Mountain Village — Summary of Paid and Unpaid Water Charges............................................................................................ Table 14 - Value of Groundwater Infrastructure Assets ........................................... Table 15 — Water Supply Allocations to Agency Contractors and Customers .............. Table 16 — Contractor and Customer Share of Agency Capital Project Improvements Table 17 — Summary of Agency's Planned Capital Projects ......................................... Table 18 — Summary of Water Storage Tank Improvements ........................................ Table 19 — Summary of Water System Improvement Components.. Table 20 - Summary of Water Demand Factors from Various Plans Table 21 — New Development Conservation Measures and Cal Green References Table 22 — Estimated Water Conservation Savings from New Development Measures 3 and 7.............................................................................. Table 23 — Water Use Factors with Conservation Table 24 - Water Demand Factors Table 25 - Nonresidential Land Uses — Employee Allocations ...................................... Table 26 — Water Demand Factors for New and Existing Development ....................... Table 27 — Water Demand Factors by SPA and PD ..................................................... Table 28 — Water Capacity Charge Component for Groundwater Supply .................... Table 29 — City Share of Agency Capital Projects Plan ................................................ Table 30 — Water Capacity Charge Component for Agency's Funded Water System Improvements....................................................................................... . Table 31 — Water Capacity Charge Component for Agency's Comment Transmission System Improvements........................................................................... Table 32 — Water Capacity Charge Component for Agency's Pipeline and Storage Improvements........................................................................................ Table 33 — Water Capacity Charge Component for Storage Tanks .............................. Table 34 — Summary of Water Capacity Charge Components ..................................... 10 10 11 17 19 25 27 29 31 32 32 33 35 36 37 38 39 40 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 46 List of Figures Figure 2.1: Specific Plan and Planned Development Areas.................................................16 Figure 2.2: Sonoma Mountain Village.................................................................................19 Appendix A: Water Tank Cost Estimate Backup October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacitv Charge Analvsis Executive Summary ES.1 Introduction and Purpose In July of 2000, the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park (City) adopted a General Plan which outlined projected growth and land use patterns and identified major infrastructure systems that the City would need to support these land use patterns. The General Plan also included policies requiring new development to pay its "fair share" of required improvements. To implement these policies, the City established and currently administers a Mitigation Fee Program in accordance with California Government Code Section 66000 et. seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act, hereinafter the Act). In 2004, the City of Rohnert Park (City) adopted its Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) which outlined a comprehensive program for managing the cost of constructing a number of infrastructure improvements that will support new development. The PFFP was updated in 2006 in order to reflect some land use changes and updated project costs. In 2006, the City also adopted its Sewer Capacity Charge Program which provided a system for the City to collect capacity charges to support expansions to the wastewater treatment and disposal and water recycling facilities, operated by the Santa Rosa Subregional System and serving the City. In 2011, the City updated and consolidated the PFFP and Sewer Capacity Charge programs into a single fee program that covered all anticipated infrastructure improvements required to serve new development, with the exception of potable water supply and storage. This Water Capacity Charge Analysis supports the adoption of Water Capacity Charges to cover the costs of providing water supply and storage for new development. ES.2 Structure of the Analysis This Executive Summary presents a summary overview of the Water Capacity Charge Analysis including: • the new land uses that will be subject to the charge; • the capital improvements that will be required to support those land uses; • the benefits provided by these improvements to new development; • the methodology used to allocate the cost of capital projects; and • a summary of the proposed Water Capacity Charges. The Executive Summary also describes the procedures required to adopt and update the charges. Chapter 1 provides a more in-depth discussion of the authority under which the City develops, adopts, and updates its capacity charge program and a discussion of the fee calculation methodology that will be applied. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 2 Chapter 2 provides a discussion of the land uses subject to the capacity charge, including changes that have occurred since the adoption of the General Plan. It also presents an overview of the cost estimating assumptions that are used throughout this analysis. Chapter 3 presents: • detailed descriptions and cost estimates for the capital facilities included in the Water Capacity Charge; • a detailed description of the cost allocation factors; • a detailed description of the fee calculations; and • the findings, required by the Act, for the Water Capacity Charge. This Water Capacity Charge Analysis has been structured to parallel the construction of the PFFP. This organization is intended to support the City's efforts to administer both charge programs and to provide the City with the option of combining the PFFP and Water Capacity Charge programs at a future date. ES.3 Land Uses Included in the Analysis This analysis is based on the buildout projections of the City's General Plan and its Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Population and water demand projections utilized in this analysis are based upon the General Plan's planning horizon, with modifications as necessary to reflect additional, project specific work. The General Plan describes potential development within six designated specific plan areas (SPAs): the Northwest SPA, the Wilfred Dowdell SPA, the Northeast SPA, the University District SPA, the Southeast SPA and the Canon Manor SPA. All of the SPAs, except Canon Manor, will receive water from the City. As a result all SPA land uses, except Canon Manor, are included in this analysis. The City is also anticipating infill development in two planned development areas (PDs), and a designated Priority Development Area (PDA). New infill in the Stadium Lands PD, Sonoma Mountain Village PD and intensified land uses in the Central Rohnert Park PDA will receive water from the City. These land uses are also included in the analysis. ESA Capital Facilities Included in the Analysis This analysis includes facilities that provide for potable water supply and storage and which are available to serve new development. The facilities included in the analysis have been developed by reviewing: • the City's General Plan, which conceptually described significant infrastructure improvements; Specific Plans and Planned Development Plans, which provide more refined analyses of the capital improvements necessary to support planned development; October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 3 • The capital improvement projections developed by the City's wholesale water supplier, Sonoma County Water Agency (Agency), portions of which will benefit planned growth in the City; and • The City's 2010 and 2015 Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs), which describes the City's overall water supply strategy. As described in more detail in Chapter 3, the PFFP Program already includes fee components to support planned improvements to the City's water transmission system and recycled water system, so these improvements are not included in the Water Capacity Charge Program. The Water Capacity Charges will support the potable water supply and storage systems. Table 1 lists the improvements included in this analysis, their cost estimates and the percentage allocated to new development. Generally, new development has a relatively modest share of the water supply facilities. The groundwater supply benefits new development in the City, but also benefits existing development in the City, so costs are shared between new and existing development in the City. In addition to benefitting new and existing development in the City, the Agency supply benefits a number of other entities that are also the Agency's customers. As a result, costs are shared throughout the Agency's service area, reducing the percentage that is allocated specifically to new development in the City. The new water tanks are specifically required of a number of the Specific Plan and Planned Development Areas and do not benefit any other water users, hence all costs for the water tanks are allocated only to new development in the City. Chapter 3 provides a detailed discussion of the allocation factors and calculations used to arrive at the "fair share" values. Table 1 — Summary Cost Estimate and Allocation Fee Component Total Costs Costs Included in the Capacity Charge Program New Development Share %to New Development Groundwater Supply $ 26,236,600 $ 26,236,600 $ 5,382,942 20.52% Agency Supply Funded Water Supply Improvements $ 24,604,000 $ 24,604,000 $ 432,612 1.76% Common Transmission System Improvements $ 39,977,000 $ 39,977,000 $ 702,916 1.76% Distribution and Storage Improvements $ 2,400,000 $ 2,400,000 $ 81,542 3.40% Storage Tanks required by development -specific EIRs $ 14,341,000 $ 14,341,000 $ 14,341,000 100.00% Total Proqram $ 107,558,600 $ 107,558,600 $ 20,941,013 The cost estimates for each improvement have been developed or updated based on independent cost estimating efforts and are Class 5 (planning -level) estimates of probable October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 4 construction cost. The Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering, International (AACE) defines a Class 5 cost estimate as follows: Generally prepared on very limited information, where little more than proposed plan type, its location, and the capacity are known, and for strategic planning purposes such as but not limited to market studies, assessment of viability, evaluation of alternate schemes, project screening, location and evaluation of resource needs and budgeting, long-range capital planning, etc. Some examples of estimating methods used would include cost/capacity curves and factors, scale -up factors, and parametric and modeling techniques. As provided for by the Act, the City may update the capacity charges as more refined cost estimates become available. ES.5 Summary of Benefit Analysis for the Capital Facilities Government Code 66013 specifically requires that "charges... benefit ... the person or property being charged". The projects included in this proposed capacity charge program benefit developing properties because the City will not have adequate, reliable capacity to serve new development without investments in its water system. Water supply sufficiency benefits new development because the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that new development document the availability of water supplies. This CEQA requirement has its basis in both legislative mandate (Water Code Section 10910 et. seq.) and case law (Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rancho Cordova). For new development, a defined program to provide sufficient water supply, which includes a clear Capital Improvement Program and funding strategy, greatly facilitates both CEQA compliance and project implementation. Water supply reliability benefits new development because findings of supply sufficiency must include an analysis of the ability to manage dry water years and must include a water shortage contingency plan (Water Code Section 10910 et. seq.). A diverse water supply portfolio provides enhanced reliability because the City is not dependent upon a single source or water supplier to meet all needs. Adequate water storage benefits new development because distribution and storage capacity is necessary to deliver the water supply to the development and to provide for fire safety. The City will achieve a reliable, sufficient water supply through investments in groundwater supply, Agency supply and storage improvements. The specific facilities providing benefit are described below. • The City's network of groundwater wells provides up to 2,577 acre-feet annually of water supply that is available to new and existing development. The City's 2004 Citywide Water Supply Assessment (WSA) and its 2005, 2010 and 2015 Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs) illustrate how the available groundwater supply is used in October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 5 a conjunctively managed fashion to provide capacity for existing users and planned growth. The groundwater facilities have largely been constructed and new development will "buy -in" to the groundwater system that provides benefit. The Agency's water supply system provides up to 7,500 acre-feet annually of water supply that is available to new and existing development. The City's 2004 Citywide WSA and its 2005, 2010 and 2015 UWMPs illustrate how the City uses its contracted supply from the Agency to provide reliable water service, while maintaining sustainable pumping of the groundwater basin. The Agency's Capital Projects Plan describes improvements to its water supply system, its common transmission system and its distribution and storage system that are necessary to allow it to comply with environmental regulations and deliver its contracted supply volumes. New development will pay a portion of the City's share of the Agency's Capital Project costs. The new water storage tanks provide benefits to various SPAs and PDs which include emergency and fire supply and compliance with regulations. Each SPA or PD will fund the cost of the discrete storage improvements required to serve the development in that specific area. ES.6 Allocation of Capacity Charges For capital improvements associated with water capacity, costs are allocated based on relative water demand. The City's UWMP is its primary planning tool for analyzing and projecting water demands, including unit demand factors. The water demand factors in this analysis are based on the 2010 UWMP with adjustments made for required conservation from new development. The demand factors are different for new and existing development because the City has established policies and requirements, including the CalGreen Building Code, which require new development to install more efficient fixtures and irrigation systems than can be required of existing development. The factors from the 2010 UWMP are used because these demand factors will allow the City to meet the water conservation targets it adopted under the Water Conservation Act of 2009. While the more recent 2015 UWMP reviews the City's progress towards achieving the adopted water use targets, the 2015 UWMP did not change the water use targets or the water use factors the City uses to project future demand. Chapter 3 provides a more detailed discussion on projected water demands. The demand factors used in this analysis are: • Single Family Dwelling Units (SFRs): 287 gallons per day (gpd) for existing development and 232.4 gpd for new development; • Multifamily Dwelling Units (MFRs): 143 gpd for existing development and 118 gpd for new development; Nonresidential employees: 28 gpd per employee for existing development and 22.4 gpd per employee for new development. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 6 Water use factors are created by multiplying the base unit (SFRs, MFRs or employees) by the demand factors as illustrated in Table 2. Table 2 — Water Use Factors for New and Existing Development Because non-residential demands are calculated on a per employee basis, the new employees projected at buildout are allocated to each SPA, PD and Infill Development based on the total new non-residential square footage associated with each type of development. Chapter 3 provides additional detail on this methodology and illustrates the calculations. ES.7 Summary of Cost -Allocation and Capacity Charges The cost for each capital facility included in the capacity charge program has been allocated to new development based on benefits received and the demand factor for each land use. This allocation is described in detail and the calculations are illustrated in Chapter 3. Summarily: for the groundwater component, costs are allocated between new and existing development in the City, because the groundwater supply benefits all land uses in the City; for the Agency supply component, costs are first allocated between the City and other Agency customers and then allocated between new and existing development in the City, because this supply benefits regional land uses; • for the water tanks, costs are allocated to land uses within each specific SPA or PD because each tank provides specific benefit to a specific SPA or PD. Table 3 represents the results of the cost allocation calculations and illustrates the portion of the proposed charge associated with each component of the program. October 2016 Units Capacity Factors d Water Use Factor Percent Share 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2.1 1x4 3x5 Land Use Class Existing Planned Buildout New Development Existing New Existing New Existing New Residential Single Family Residential units 7,719 10,343 2,624 287.0 232.4 2,215,353 609,772 43% 12% Multi -Family Residential units 8,594 11,483 2,889 143.0 118.0 1,228,942 341,003 24% 7% Senior Housing units 207 209 2 143.0 118.0 29,601 236 1% 0% Assisted Living units 0 135 135 143.0 118.0 - 15,935 0% 0% Non -Residential Employees 21,900 25,831 3,931 28.0 22.4 613,200 88,054 12% 2% Totals 1 1 4,087,096 1,055,000 79% 21% Because non-residential demands are calculated on a per employee basis, the new employees projected at buildout are allocated to each SPA, PD and Infill Development based on the total new non-residential square footage associated with each type of development. Chapter 3 provides additional detail on this methodology and illustrates the calculations. ES.7 Summary of Cost -Allocation and Capacity Charges The cost for each capital facility included in the capacity charge program has been allocated to new development based on benefits received and the demand factor for each land use. This allocation is described in detail and the calculations are illustrated in Chapter 3. Summarily: for the groundwater component, costs are allocated between new and existing development in the City, because the groundwater supply benefits all land uses in the City; for the Agency supply component, costs are first allocated between the City and other Agency customers and then allocated between new and existing development in the City, because this supply benefits regional land uses; • for the water tanks, costs are allocated to land uses within each specific SPA or PD because each tank provides specific benefit to a specific SPA or PD. Table 3 represents the results of the cost allocation calculations and illustrates the portion of the proposed charge associated with each component of the program. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 7 Table 3 - Proposed Water Capacity Charge Components * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons Tables 4 through 11 illustrate the application of the proposed capacity charge components to the individual SPAs and PDs. The tables also include a 3% administration allowance so that the City can cover its costs associated with program administration and updates over time. Support for this "administration allowance" is also included in Chapter 3. Table 4 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Infill (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ Groundwater Charge Component Agency Charge Components Tank Charge Components Land Use Class Funded Water Suppl Common Transmission System pipelines & Storage NE SPA UD SPA SE SPA WD SPA NW SPA Stadium Lands SMV Residential Single Family Residential units $ 1,185.69 $ 95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ $ 43.61 Single Family Residential units $ 1,185.69 $95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ 2,192.67 $3,856.34 $4,574.10 $ $ - $ $5,233.60 Multi -Family Residential units $ 602.25 $48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,113.73 $1,958.76 $2,323.34 $ $3,665.57 $ $2,658.32 Senior Housing units $ 602.25 $48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,113.73 $1,958.76 $2,323.34 $ $3,665.57 $ $2,658.32 Assisted Living units $ 602.25 $48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,113.73 $1,958.76 $2,323.34 $ $3,665.57 $ $2,658.32 Non -Residential pd $ 5.10 $ 0.41 $ 0.67 $ 0.08 $ 9.44 $ 16.59 $ 19.68 $ $ 31.05 $ $ 22.52 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons Tables 4 through 11 illustrate the application of the proposed capacity charge components to the individual SPAs and PDs. The tables also include a 3% administration allowance so that the City can cover its costs associated with program administration and updates over time. Support for this "administration allowance" is also included in Chapter 3. Table 4 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Infill (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 Groundwater Charge Component Agency Char a Components Tank Charge Component 3% Administrative Allowance Total Mitigation Fee per Unit Number of Units in SPA SPA Charge Land Use Land Use Class Funded Common Pipelines Water Transmission & Supply System Storage Residential Single Family Residential units $ 1,185.69 $ 95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ $ 43.61 $1,497.38 0 $ Multi -Family Residential units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ $ 22.15 $ 760.57 0 $ Senior Housing units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ $ 22.15 $ 760.57 0 $ Assisted Living units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ $ 22.15 $ 760.57 0 $ Non -Residential (gpd) $ 5.10 $ 0.41 $ 0.67 $ 0.08 $ $ 0.19 1 $ 6.44 1 0 $ * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 8 Table 5 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Northeast SPA (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ 3,836,907 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons Table 6 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for University District SPA (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ 7,082,948 Groundwater Charge Component AgencyChar a Components Tank Charge Component 3% Administrative 1 Allowance Total Mitigation Fee per Unit Number of Units in SPA SPA Charge I Land Use Land Use Class Funded Common Pipelines Water Transmission & Supply S stem Storage Residential Pipelines & Storage Residential Single Family Residential units $ 1,185.69 $ 95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ 2,192.67 $ 109.39 $ 3,755.83 920 $ 3,455,364 Multi -Family Residential units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,113.73 $ 55.56 $ 1,907.71 200 $ 381,543 Senior Housing units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,113.73 $ 55.56 $ 1,907.71 0 $ Assisted Living units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,113.73 $ 55.56 $ 1,907.71 0 $ Non -Residential (gpd) $ 5.10 $ 0.41 $ 0.67 $ 0.08 1 $ 9.44 $ 0.47 $ 16.16 0 $ * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons Table 6 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for University District SPA (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ 7,082,948 * For Residential Land Usesthe cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 Groundwater Charge Component Agency Char a Components Tank Charge Component 3% Administrative Allowance Total Mitigation Fee per Unit Number of Units in SPA SPA Charge Land Use Land Use Class Funded Water Supply Common Transmission S stem Pipelines & Storage Residential Single Family Residential units $ 1,185.69 $ 95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ 3,856.34 $ 159.30 $5,469.41 883 $ 4,829,489 Multi -Family Residential units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78,64 $ 9.12 $ 1,958.76 $ 80.92 $2,778.10 762 $ 2,116,912 Senior Housing (units) $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,958.76 $ 80.92 $2,778.10 0 $ - Assisted Living units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,958.76 $ 80.92 $2,778.10 0 $ Non -Residential (gpd) 1 $ 5.10 $ 0.41 $ 0.67 $ 0.08 $ 16.59 $ 0.69 $ 23.54 5802 $ 136,548 * For Residential Land Usesthe cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacitv Charge Analvsis 9 Table 7 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Southeast SPA (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ 2,710,650 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons Table 8 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Sonoma Mountain Village PD (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ 3,737,751 Groundwater Charge Component Agency Char a Components Tank Charge Componentl 3% Administrative Allowance Total Mitigation Fee per Unit Number of Units in SPA SPA Charge I Land Use Land Use Class Funded Common Water Transmission Supply System Pipelines & Storage Residential Residential Single Family Residential (units) $ 1,185.69 $ 95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ 4,574.10 $ 180.84 $6,208.71 394 $ 2,446,231 Multi -Family Residential units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 2,323.34 $ 91.85 $3,153.61 81 $ 255,443 Senior Housing units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 2,323.34 $ 91.85 $3,153.61 0 $ - Assisted Living units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 2,323.34 $ 91.85 $3,153.61 0 $ - Non -Residential (gpd) $ 5.10 $ 0.41 $ 0.67 $ 0.08 1 $ 19.68 $ 0.78 1 $ 26.72 1 336 $ 8,977 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons Table 8 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Sonoma Mountain Village PD (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ 3,737,751 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 Groundwater Charge Component Agency Char a Components Tank Charge Component 3% Administrative I Allowance Total Mitigation Fee per Unit Number of Units in PD PD Charge I Land Use Land Use Class Funded Water I Supply Common Transmission System Pipelines & Storage Residential Single Family Residential units $ 1,185.69 $ 95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ 5,233.60 $ 200.62 $6,887.99 378 $ 2,603,660 Multi -Family Residential (units) $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 2,658.32 $ 101.90 $3,498.65 275 $ 962,127 Senior Housing (units) $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 2,658.32 $ 101.90 $3,498.65 0 $ - Assisted Living units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 2,658.32 $ 101.90 $3,498.65 0 $ - Non -Residential (gpd) $ 5.10 $ 0.41 $ 0.67 $ 0.08 $ 22.52 1 $ 0.86 1 $ 29.64 1 5802 $ 171,964 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacitv Charge Analvsis 10 Table 9 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Northwest SPA (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ 2,809,089 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons Table 10 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Wilfred Dowdell SPA (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ 64,372 Groundwater Charge Component Agency Charge Components Tank Charge Component 3% Administrative Allowance Total Mitigation Fee per Unit Number of Units in SPA SPA Charge Land Use Land Use Class Funded Water Supply Common Transmission System Pipelines & Storage Residential Single Family Residential (units) $ 1,185.69 $ 95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ - $ 43.61 $1,497.38 0 $ - Multi -Family Residential units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 3,665.57 $ 132.12 $4,536.11 398 $ 1,805,370 Senior Housing units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 3,665.57 $ 132.12 $4,536.11 0 $ - Assisted Living units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 3,665.57 $ 132.12 $4,536.11 0 $ - Non -Residential (gpd) $ 5.10 $ 0.41 $ 0.67 $ 0.08 $ 31.05 $ 1.12 $ 38.43 26118 $ 1,003,719 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons Table 10 - Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Wilfred Dowdell SPA (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ 64,372 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 Groundwater Charge Component Agency Charge Components Tank Charge I Component 3% Administrative Allowance Total Mitigation Fee per Unit Number of Units I in SPA SPA Charge Land Use Land Use Class Funded Water Suppl Common Transmission S stem Pipelines & Storage Residential Single Family Residential (units) $ 1,185.69 $ 95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ $ 43.61 $1,497.38 0 $ Multi -Family Residential units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ $ 22.15 $ 760.57 0 $ Senior Housing units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ $ 22.15 $ 760.57 0 $ Assisted Living (units) $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ $ 22.15 $ 760.57 0 $ Non -Residential (gpd) $ 5.10 $ 0.41 $ 0.67 $ 0.08 $ $ 0.19 $ 6.44 9990 $ 64,372 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 11 Table 11 — Proposed Water Capacity Charges for Stadium Lands PD (2016-17) Total Charge Burden $ 186,951 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons ES.8 Approval Process and Annual Updates The City Council approves all Water Capacity Charges. The Council renders its decision on the proposed charges after calling a Public Hearing and considering testimony and evidence presented at the Public Hearing. The law allows the City to update its capacity charges and requires annual public accountings for the charges and their use. All annual reporting is made at a public meeting. In a City with a large planned growth element, these annual findings are especially relevant. The charge calculations and revenue projections are based on planning projections for new development and budgetary estimates for the capital improvements. As capital improvement budgets are updated, through the design and construction process, and as land use projections are updated as development proceeds, it is very important to update the capacity charges to reflect current costs and growth patterns in order to assure that the program is generating enough revenue to fund the planned capital facilities, through reasonable allocations across all land uses. October 2016 Groundwater Charge Component Agency Char a Components Tank Charge Component 3% Administrative I Allowance Total Mitigation Fee per Unit Number of Units in PD PD Charge I Land Use Land Use Class Funded Water I Supply Common Transmission S stem Pipelines & Storage Residential Single Family Residential units $ 1,185.69 $ 95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ $ 43.61 $ 1,497.38 0 $ Multi -Family Residential units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ $ 22.15 $ 760.57 338 $ 257,073 Senior Housing units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 22.15 $ 760.57 0 $ Assisted Living units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 22.15 $ 760.57 0 $ Non -Residential (gpd) 1 $ 5.10 $ 0.41 $ 0.67 $ 0.08 $ $ 0.19 $ 6.44 4637 $ 29,878 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons ES.8 Approval Process and Annual Updates The City Council approves all Water Capacity Charges. The Council renders its decision on the proposed charges after calling a Public Hearing and considering testimony and evidence presented at the Public Hearing. The law allows the City to update its capacity charges and requires annual public accountings for the charges and their use. All annual reporting is made at a public meeting. In a City with a large planned growth element, these annual findings are especially relevant. The charge calculations and revenue projections are based on planning projections for new development and budgetary estimates for the capital improvements. As capital improvement budgets are updated, through the design and construction process, and as land use projections are updated as development proceeds, it is very important to update the capacity charges to reflect current costs and growth patterns in order to assure that the program is generating enough revenue to fund the planned capital facilities, through reasonable allocations across all land uses. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 12 1. Authority and Methodology 1.1 Authority In California, an agency's ability to levy capacity charges is governed by California Government Code Section 66000 et. seq. and specifically described in Section 66013 (the Mitigation Fee Act, hereinafter the Act). While the Act specifically exempts water and sewer capacity charges from the nexus findings required for other types of mitigation fees,' it specifically defines a "capacity charge" and limits that charge to "the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the ... charge is imposed". A capacity charge is defined as "a charge for facilities in existence at the time a charge is imposed or charges for new facilities to be constructed in the future that are of benefit to the person or property being charged". As with other types of mitigation fees, the Act requires that capacity charges be deposited in a separate capital facilities fund and that annual accounting be provided for that fund. The Act also outlines the provisions for establishing or modifying the capacity charge. 1.2 Methodology The methodology for calculating capacity charges, including the methodology used to determine the cost of facilities included in the charge program, must meet the Act's test for reasonableness. Because of the unique circumstances of individual agencies, there are numerous methodologies for calculating capacity charges but each is grounded in the basic principal of reasonable allocation of costs to benefitting entities. Several major publications regarding mitigation fees and charges for various infrastructure needs are recognized in the industry including: • Development Impact Fees, Arthur C. Nelson, 1998 • Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges, Manual M1, American Water Works Association, 5th Edition, 2000 • Comprehensive Guide to Water and Wastewater Finance and Pricing, Second Edition, George A. Raftelis, 1993 • System Development Charges for Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater Facilities, Arthur C. Nelson, 1995 These publications describe a number of methodologies but all the methodologies are grounded in two primary approaches — the incremental cost methodology and the system buy -in methodology. The two approaches are described below to illustrate the different perspectives. A method that combines both perspectives is also described. Government Code Section 66013(h) October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 13 Incremental Cost Method The incremental cost methodology is commonly used for establishing fees in communities experiencing considerable new growth. The approach is based on the cost of new or planned capital facilities. The cost of growth -related facilities is allocated to the new development to be served by the facilities. Under this approach, new customers pay for the incremental investment necessary for system expansion. Consequently, new customers pay fully for additional capacity in new facilities to avoid imposing a burden on existing customers. System Buy -In Method The system buy -in method is based on the average investment in the capital facilities by current customers. Raftelis describes the system buy -in methodology as follows: "Under this approach, capital recovery charges are based upon the `buy -in' concept that existing users, through service charges, tax contributions, and other up -front charges, have developed a valuable public capital facility. The charge to users is designed to recognize the current value of providing the capacity necessary to serve additional users. The charge is computed by establishing fixed asset value under a historical or reproduction cost basis and deducting relevant liabilities (long- term debt, loans, etc.) from this amount. The number of units of service is then divided into this difference (considered to be the utility's equity) to establish the capital recovery charge." More simply, the buy -in fee is determined by taking the current value of assets (historical cost escalated to current dollars and adjusted for depreciation) divided by the current number of customers (expressed in equivalent residential units). By paying fees calculated on this basis, new development buys into the existing capital facilities on par with existing development. Combined Method — Future System Buy -In This method combines both existing and planned facilities into fee calculations. This is because new development benefits from surplus capacity in existing facilities, but also requires new facilities to provide required capacity. The challenge in using a combined approach for fee calculation is to make certain that new development is not paying for needed capacity in both existing and new facilities. One approach that combines both existing and new facilities is the future system buy -in methodology, which is similar to the system buy -in method described previously, except that it views and assesses the system at some point in the future. Where the typical system buy -in approach divides the existing system value by the current number of units of development, the future buy -in approach considers what the system will be like at some future planning horizon and divides this by the total number of units of development to be served at that point in time. This analysis utilizes the future system buy -in method. The future Rohnert Park water supply and storage system will include a groundwater supply system, an improved Agency supply system and five new storage tanks, required by the CEQA documents for the various SPAs and PDs. This analysis describes the existing and future development benefitting from the system, October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 14 the costs associated with the system and the calculations used to allocate the value of these facilities to the benefitting land uses. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charqe Analvsis Land Uses & Basis of Cost Estimates 1.3 Introduction 15 This chapter outlines the existing and proposed, residential and nonresidential land uses within the City and its sphere of influence. The land use classes are used to model the impacts created by new and existing development in order to provide for a reasonable allocation of costs. 1.4 Existing and General Plan Proposed Land Uses The City's 2000 General Plan identified six major SPAs: • Northeast SPA • University District SPA • Southeast SPA • Canon Manor SPA • Wilfred Dowdell SPA • Northwest SPA These are illustrated on Figure 2.1. The City's General Plan anticipated annexation and development of all of the SPAs except the Canon Manor SPA. The City provides sewer but not water service to the Canon Manor SPA so Canon Manor land uses are not included in the water capacity charge calculations. To date the University District, Southeast, Northwest and Wilfred Dowdell SPAs have been approved. The City has also approved three major infill development projects: the Stadium Lands PD, the Sonoma Mountain Village PD, and Central Rohnert Park PDA. Each of these planned developments includes enough specificity to allow for the calculation of capacity charges associated with the proposed land uses. Table 12 below presents the land uses considered in the Water Capacity Charge Program. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charge Analysis 16 IIIIF �I I VIII II II II �� i I I I li II P Wilfred / Dowdell — — — — Specific Plan Area SII SII mll a � `II Northwest SII jl II Specific w Plan Area II �I o.FE�I I � i �l ¢ Northeast Stadium I g� Specific II Lands 81 tl pNNuq % ,j Plan Area Planned Development — 1; ��" --- — —_ -- _---- --� - -- University 4 Specific �i Plan Area. D II Canon ` Manor 1 Specific Plan Area CST \�—_—� III s$FPo II Sonoma II MountainSoutheast II Figure 2.1: village Specific Specific Plan Areas & Planned Plan Area Planned Development Areas Development October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 17 Table 12 - Land Uses in the Water Capacity Charge Program Notes: 1. Units of Land Use Classes in PFFP 2011 which provided original assumptions for water infrastructure needs. 2. New Development land use includes all approved SPAS, PDs and the PDA alonq with adjustments for prepayments in Sonoma Mountail Villaqe 3. NW SPA Land Use Classes areas shown below are from Table 3-1 of the adopted Northwest Specific Plan. 4. Sonoma Mountain Village Land Use Classes shown are the remaining planned residential units and non-residential area for which the Per Acre Development Fee was not pre -paid and land -use conversions have occurred as specifically explained in this Report. 5. Additional development potential of residential and non-residential land uses in Central Rohnert Park PDA Plan,Table 4.2 (PDA Site Potential and Requirements). 6. Includes Planned Buildout reduction in square footage of Light Industrial in Sonoma Mountain Village PD due to land use conversion. 1.5 Adjustments for Paid Fees The City has currently administers two programs that are intended to mitigate for new development's impacts on water supply. These are known as the "Per Acre Fee Program" and the "WaterMastewater Conservation Fee Program". All development within the City's pre -2000 city limits generally paid the Per Acre Fee and WaterMastewater Conservation Fee that was in effect at the time of their development2. The City's proposed water capacity charges will replace the Per Acre Fee and the WaterMastewater Conservation Fee. This replacement will not affect most of the new development areas which have not yet paid capacity fees. The exceptions are 2 According to the City's records, the first formal resolution adopting per acre fees is Resolution No. 72-148 adopted 11-6-72, approximately 10 years after incorporation. October 2016 Specific Plan Areas, Planned Development, Priority Development Area Infill Land Use Class PFFP 2011 Land Use 1 Planned Buildout New Develo ment2 NE SPA UD SPA SE SPA WD SPA NW SPA Stadium Lands Sonoma Mountain Village Central Rohnert Park PDA5 Residential Single Family Residential units 7,719 10,343 2,624 920 883 394 0 0 0 378 0 Multi -Family Residential units 8,594 11,483 2,889 200 762 81 0 398 338 275 835 Senior Housing units 207 209 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Assisted Living units 0 135 135 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -Residential General Office square feet 1,028,506 1,302,138 273,632 0 0 0 0 58,400 0 10,000 205,232 Hotel/Motel square feet 519,483 664,483 145,000 0 0 0 0 54,000 0 91,000 0 Retail square feet 2,148,308 3,738,292 1,589,984 0 175,000 10,0001 302,114 458,700 140,000 74,244 429,926 Light Industrial(square feet 8 1,638,472 972,923 347,515 0 0 0 0 218,200 01 0 129,315 Heavy Industrial(square feet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Warehouse (square feet) 1,589,632 1,589,632 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0E764,4]3 Total Non -Residential 6,924,401 8,267,468 1,343,067 0 175,000 10,000 302,114 789,300 140,000 175,244 Notes: 1. Units of Land Use Classes in PFFP 2011 which provided original assumptions for water infrastructure needs. 2. New Development land use includes all approved SPAS, PDs and the PDA alonq with adjustments for prepayments in Sonoma Mountail Villaqe 3. NW SPA Land Use Classes areas shown below are from Table 3-1 of the adopted Northwest Specific Plan. 4. Sonoma Mountain Village Land Use Classes shown are the remaining planned residential units and non-residential area for which the Per Acre Development Fee was not pre -paid and land -use conversions have occurred as specifically explained in this Report. 5. Additional development potential of residential and non-residential land uses in Central Rohnert Park PDA Plan,Table 4.2 (PDA Site Potential and Requirements). 6. Includes Planned Buildout reduction in square footage of Light Industrial in Sonoma Mountain Village PD due to land use conversion. 1.5 Adjustments for Paid Fees The City has currently administers two programs that are intended to mitigate for new development's impacts on water supply. These are known as the "Per Acre Fee Program" and the "WaterMastewater Conservation Fee Program". All development within the City's pre -2000 city limits generally paid the Per Acre Fee and WaterMastewater Conservation Fee that was in effect at the time of their development2. The City's proposed water capacity charges will replace the Per Acre Fee and the WaterMastewater Conservation Fee. This replacement will not affect most of the new development areas which have not yet paid capacity fees. The exceptions are 2 According to the City's records, the first formal resolution adopting per acre fees is Resolution No. 72-148 adopted 11-6-72, approximately 10 years after incorporation. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 18 Sonoma Mountain Village and Stadium Lands PDs and the Wilfred Dowdell and University District SPAs where some fees have been paid. These are discussed below. Sonoma Mountain Village Payments A review of building permits within the Sonoma Mountain Village PD indicates that the City has received full payment of Per Acre Fees and Water/Wastewater Conservation Fees for 80 acres known as the "North Site" within the Sonoma Mountain Village PD some time ago. The revenue was used by the City to construct improvements the water system. This "North Site" contains the existing buildings on the site and is located between Valley House Drive and Camino Colegio, as illustrated on Figure 2.2. The development plan for Sonoma Mountain Village indicates that the "North Site", which has paid fees, includes development phases 1A, 1B and 1 D. The South Site, which has not paid fees, includes phases 1 C, 2 and 3. Phases 1A, 1 B and 1 D include 322 single family residences, 719 multi -family residences and 568,535 square feet of non-residential development. Because the water fees have been paid for this site, they will not be included in the capacity charge program. Table 13 illustrates the reductions in land use contributing to the capacity charge program, as a result of pre -paid fees in the Sonoma Mountain Village PD. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charqe Analvsis Figure 2.2 Sonoma Mountain Village Planned Development 19 EXISTING CRY YIELL FUTURE POLICCIIRE STAMIV FUTURE SEWWER PUMP STATION W4TER TANK CAMINO COLEGIO � � � 0 3 a k\ mini.-.- 11 LOFTS BLDG — RAILROAD TRACKS THEATER BUILDING WITH PARKING GARAGE MIXED USE RETAIL WIGREEN ROOF CHAMPIONSHIP ALL-WEATHER SOCCER FIELD CIVIC BLDG INNOVATION CENTER PHASE Ib -_ MIXED USE ■ ._ --- RETAIL -- -- WIGREEM ~ ROOF WE LINED I WEU-ARKING CENTER I GARAGE PHASE 2 _ _, - - 1NIGREEN CODOM ROOF ENTERPRISES MIXED USE -__�— RETAIL - THE --- - - -1, VALLEY SQUARE �� _-i HOUSE Gr -_ MIXED USE ■ ._ --- RETAIL -- -- WIGREEM ~ ROOF WE October 2016 I PHASE 2 _ _, _ - PHASE 3 - CIVIC BLDG --�,------- _ - -- r 1 PHASE 1 A PHASE IB - - - - ® PHASE IC ! t PG&E /f SUBSTATION L� PHASE I C} `T �+! Q PHASE 2 I t 3' � IPHASE NOT APART NOT APART f ti I >i 01 N 500 y■�.11' - - - - - EA ST RA IL R0 AD AVE NUE October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 20 Table 13 — Sonoma Mountain Village — Summary of Paid and Unpaid Water Charges Prepaid Usesl Land Uses Impacting in Phases 1A, I Water Supply Land Use Class Sonoma Mountain Villaqe PD Land Use by Proiect Phase 1B and 1D (Phases 1C, 2 and 3) Source: Sonoma Mountain Village Project DEIR Table 2-2 and Figure 2-7 (PBS&J August 2009) Stadium Lands, Wilfred Dowdell and University District Payments Since late 2013, Per Acre and Water/Wastewater Conservation Fees were paid for development projects within the Wilfred Dowdell and University District SPAs and Stadium Lands PD. The revenue from these fees has not yet been expended. The City has reviewed these payments in light of the proposed Water Capacity Charges and concluded that the payments received are generally equivalent to the fees that would be due under the proposed Water Capacity Charge Program. Therefore, in order to simplify the calculations and avoid disparity within these development areas, Water Capacity Charges have been calculated assuming that all the land uses within the Stadium Lands PD and the Wilfred Dowdell and University District SPA will pay the new Water Capacity Charges. The City will transfer revenue received from Per Acre Fees and Water/Wastewater Conservation Fees to the Water Capacity Charge Program and use this existing fee revenue to construct improvements contemplated by the Water Capacity Charge Program. This will preserve equity between property within these developing areas and allow necessary water system improvements to be constructed. 1.6 Growth Management and Absorption Rates The City has an adopted Growth Management Ordinance that is intended to provide for orderly build out of residential development over the 20 -year planning horizon contemplated by the General Plan. In its simplest form, the Growth Management Ordinance has the effect of limiting the number of residential building permits issued to 225 per year. There are exceptions for affordable housing and provisions to carry over building permits (i.e., if 50 are issued in one 3 Chapter 17.66 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code. October 2016 1A 113 1C 1D 2 3 Total Residential Single Family Residential units 167 94 11 61 153 214 700 322 378 Multi -Family Residential units 461 225 275 33 994 719 275 Senior Housing units - - - Assisted LW units - - Non -Residential General Office square feet 285,978 10,000 130,000 425,978 415,978 10,000 Hotel/Motel square feet 91,000 91,000 - 91,000 Retail (square feet 149,224 1,667 35,910 1,666 36,667 1,667 226,801 152,557 74,244 Light Industrial(square feet Heavy Industrial square feet Warehouse(square feet Total Non -Residential 435,202 1,667 136,910 131,666 36,667 1,667 743,779 568,535 175,244 Source: Sonoma Mountain Village Project DEIR Table 2-2 and Figure 2-7 (PBS&J August 2009) Stadium Lands, Wilfred Dowdell and University District Payments Since late 2013, Per Acre and Water/Wastewater Conservation Fees were paid for development projects within the Wilfred Dowdell and University District SPAs and Stadium Lands PD. The revenue from these fees has not yet been expended. The City has reviewed these payments in light of the proposed Water Capacity Charges and concluded that the payments received are generally equivalent to the fees that would be due under the proposed Water Capacity Charge Program. Therefore, in order to simplify the calculations and avoid disparity within these development areas, Water Capacity Charges have been calculated assuming that all the land uses within the Stadium Lands PD and the Wilfred Dowdell and University District SPA will pay the new Water Capacity Charges. The City will transfer revenue received from Per Acre Fees and Water/Wastewater Conservation Fees to the Water Capacity Charge Program and use this existing fee revenue to construct improvements contemplated by the Water Capacity Charge Program. This will preserve equity between property within these developing areas and allow necessary water system improvements to be constructed. 1.6 Growth Management and Absorption Rates The City has an adopted Growth Management Ordinance that is intended to provide for orderly build out of residential development over the 20 -year planning horizon contemplated by the General Plan. In its simplest form, the Growth Management Ordinance has the effect of limiting the number of residential building permits issued to 225 per year. There are exceptions for affordable housing and provisions to carry over building permits (i.e., if 50 are issued in one 3 Chapter 17.66 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 21 year, 400 may be issued the following year, providing a 2 -year average of 225 per year). Because the Growth Management Ordinance clearly sets forth the residential development pattern, this analysis does not include an analysis of probable development patterns. 1.7 Basis of Cost Estimates Capital facility needs and costs were gathered from a range of sources including: • City of Rohnert Park General Plan • Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) for the o University District SPA (May 2006) o Stadium Lands PD (February 2008) o Northeast SPA (May 2008) o Wilfred Dowdell SPA (September 2008) o Southeast SPA (July 2009) o Sonoma Mountain Village PD (August 2009) o Northwest SPA (June 2014) • City of Rohnert Park 2010 Urban Water Management Plan • City of Rohnert Park 2015 Urban Water Management Plan • City of Rohnert Park Asset Valuation for Municipal Wells • City of Rohnert Park Water Model Study (Brelje & Race, 2004) • Sonoma County Water Agency Capital Projects Plan — FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17. The facilities included in this analysis are primarily in the planning stages. Cost estimates have been developed by reviewing the proposed design criteria, reviewing available local construction cost information for similar facilities, and utilizing standard estimating guidance such as the RS Means Construction Cost Data. Cost estimates are Class 5 (planning -level) estimates of probable construction cost as defined by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering, International (AACE) as follows: Generally prepared on very limited information, where little more than proposed plan type, its location, and the capacity are known, and for strategic planning purposes such as but not limited to market studies, assessment of viability, evaluation of alternate schemes, project screening, location and evaluation of resource needs and budgeting, long-range capital planning, etc. Some examples of estimating methods used would include cost/capacity curves and factors, scale- up factors, and parametric and modeling techniques. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 22 These costs are indexed to the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (ENR CCI) for the San Francisco Bay Area which is 10897.59 (August 2014). The costs for the well infrastructure is indexed to 11555.15 (July 2016 ENR CCI). 1.8 Land Acquisition, Rights -of -Way and Environmental Mitigation Costs In general, the Water Capacity Charge Program assumes that rights-of-way will be dedicated in accordance with the City's General Plan Policy, when the right-of-way is within the City. For the Agency's projects, the capacity charge program assumes that right-of-way costs are included in the Agency's cost estimates. The capacity charge program also assumes that environmental mitigation costs for wetlands and other sensitive habitats are covered in the costs estimates for the proposed improvement projects. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charge Analysis 23 2. Water System Facilities 2,1 Introduction The City's General Plan has four major goals related to water supply. These are: • PF -E Provide sufficient quantities of water for Rohnert Park residents and businesses, while ensuring that safe groundwater yield is not exceeded. • PF -F Utilize purchased water supplies... and reduce reliance on groundwater drawn from municipal wells, except for emergency use.4 • PF -G Continue to encourage water conservation through use of reclaimed water and reduction of water consumption and discharge, for both existing and new development. • PF -H Ensure that groundwater withdrawal does not exceed safe yield.5 These goals are supported by 15 policies that relate to the groundwater supply system, the water that the City purchases from the Agency, the recycled water system, the water distribution system and overall conservation practices. While the City has adequate capacity to serve its existing population, investments in the existing groundwater system, expansions to the Agency and recycled water systems, and expansions to the distribution system are necessary to comply with the General Plan policies and assure that the water supply system is reliable under a range of hydrologic and emergency conditions. This chapter provides narrative description and cost estimates for the proposed water supply and storage facilities as they are currently understood. Because some of the proposed facilities are still subject to review under CEQA, the descriptions included in this analysis are intended to present the basis of the cost estimates, not to commit the City or the Agency to a particular construction strategy. 2.2 Water Facilities Description The City has three sources of water supply: local groundwater, recycled water and supply it purchases from the Agency. The City also maintains its own retail distribution system including, 4.5 million gallons of storage capacity and seven booster pump stations that deliver water to two pressure zones. The City uses a conjunctive use strategy to balance its water supply portfolio and assure reliable delivery of water to all users. Under normal conditions the City uses primarily its Agency supply and recycled water supply, with groundwater used to meet peak demands or to provide reliability in the event of unanticipated circumstances. When the Agency supply is constrained by drought or regulatory requirements, the City has the ability to use more groundwater and reduce its demand on the Agency's system. ° The General Plan predicted that the groundwater well system would be dedicated to "backup and emergency use" in the Year 2010, based upon the Agency's estimates for completing improvements to its water diversion and transmission system. The City now estimates that these improvements will not be completed until after 2020, but undertaking and funding these improvements is necessary to comply with existing General Plan Goal PF -F. As a result, the City currently uses a conjunctive use water management strategy, drawing on its Agency and recycled water supplies before utilizing groundwater. 5 The City's UWMP includes a detailed analysis of the groundwater supply supporting a planned use of 2,577 AFY of groundwater and illustrating consistency with General Plan Goal PF -H. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 24 Groundwater Supply The City has developed a total of 42 groundwater wells, 29 of which are currently active. One additional well is classified as a standby well that can be used in emergencies for up to five consecutive days but not more than 15 days in a year. The active wells have a total rated production capacity of 8.3 mgd. All of the City's wells are located in the Santa Rosa Valley Groundwater Basin. The City conducted extensive work during its 2004 Citywide Water Supply Assessment in order to document that its well field has a long term, sustainable production rate of 2,577 acre-feet per year (AFY). The City supported the Groundwater Management Plan recently adopted by the Sonoma County Water Agency's Board of Directors and is working with other agencies in the Santa Rosa Plain to comply with the Groundwater Sustainability Act of 2014. While the City's annual demand on its well field varies from year to year, the groundwater supply is available for the benefit of new and existing development. As part of its ongoing risk management activities, the City developed an estimate of the value of its groundwater infrastructure in 2007, including all well infrastructure, buildings, tanks and ancillary facilities. These values have been brought forward to 2016 values to represent the infrastructure investment available for new and existing users, and is shown in Table 14. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charqe Analvsis Table 14 - Value of Groundwater Infrastructure Assets Facility Appraised Value 2007 Depreciation* 2007-2016 Inflation Adjustment Value 2016 Well $ 1,020,100 $ 836,482 $ 886,854 Well 4/Tank 1 $ 464,400 $ 380,808 $ 403,740 Well $ 904,200 $ 741,444 $ 786,093 Well 6 $ 816,560 $ 669,579 $ 709,900 Well $ 1,052,300 $ 862,886 $ 914,848 Well 8 & 8A $ 1,762,800 $ 1,445,496 $ 1,532,541 Well 9/Tank 2 $ 1,000,800 $ 820,656 $ 870,075 Well 10 $ 1,087,800 $ 891,996 $ 945,711 Well 11 $ 884,600 $ 725,372 $ 769,053 Well 12 $ 798,400 $ 654,688 $ 694,112 Well 13 $ 581,900 $ 477,158 $ 505,892 Well 14 $ 1,903,900 $ 1,561,198 $ 1,655,211 Well 15 $ 2,067,300 $ 1,695,186 $ 1,797,267 Well 16 $ 2,164,200 $ 1,774,644 $ 1,881,510 Well 17 $ 609,000 $ 499,380 $ 529,452 Well 18 $ 687,600 $ 563,832 $ 597,785 Well 19 $ 559,080 $ 458,446 $ 486,052 Well 20 $ 608,600 $ 499,052 $ 529,104 Well 21 $ 580,900 $ 476,338 $ 505,022 Well 22 $ 505,900 $ 414,838 $ 439,819 Well 24/Tank 7 $ 1,003,600 $ 822,952 $ 872,509 Well 26/Tank 4 $ 938,100 $ 769,242 $ 815,564 Well 27/Tank 5 $ 1,375,500 $ 1,127, 910 $ 1,195, 831 Well 29 $ 673,400 $ 552,188 $ 585,440 Well 30 $ 391,900 $ 321,358 $ 340,710 Well 31 $ 686,900 $ 563,258 $ 597,176 Well 33 $ 750,900 $ 615,738 $ 652,817 Well 34 $ 819,200 $ 671,744 $ 712,195 Well 35 $ 690,900 $ 566,538 $ 600,654 Well 37 $ 347,190 $ 284,696 $ 301,840 Well 39 $ 489,233 $ 401,171 $ 425,329 Well 40 $ 547,180 $ 448,688 $ 475,707 Well 41 $ 909,600 $ 745,872 $ 790,787 Well 42 $ 494,600 $ 405,572 $ 429,995 Totals $ 30.178.543 $ 24.746.405 $ 26.236.593 Well infrastructure asset value remaining I $ 26,236,593 * Assumes a 50 -year facility life Recycled Water Supply 25 The City hosts an urban recycled water system that supplies irrigation water for parks and school grounds south of Golf Course Drive, the North and South Rohnert Park Municipal Golf courses, and various commercial and industrial sites. Current recycled water use averages October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 26 approximately 1,000 AFY6. Recycled water is supplied by the City of Santa Rosa Subregional System (Subregional System), of which the City is a member. Recycled water is delivered through a low-pressure and high pressure distribution system. The Subregional System's Incremental Recycled Water Program (IRWP) Master Plan and EIR includes an expansion of the recycled water system (including pumping and distribution facilities) that will allow it to deliver up to 1,300 AFY of recycled water supply to the City. The City's plan for managing the costs of expanding the recycled water system is included in the 2011 PFFP. Costs for the recycled water system are not included in this analysis. Sonoma County Water Agency Supply The Agency is the primary provider of potable water to eight water contractors, including the cities of Santa Rosa, Petaluma, Sonoma, Rohnert Park, and Cotati, the Town of Windsor, and the Valley of the Moon, and North Marin Water Districts. The Agency also provides surplus water, by agreement, to other customers including Cal American Water Company's Larkfield system, the Forestville, Kenwood and Lawndale Water Districts, the Penngrove Water Company, Marin Municipal Water District and small, non -surplus customers consisting of the County of Sonoma, State of California and Santa Rosa Junior College. The Restructured Agreement for Water Supply (2006) defines the business agreement between the Agency, its prime contractors and its customers. Table 15 illustrates the annual water supply allocation, by contractor and customer, defined in that agreement. 6 See Table 5-5, City of Rohnert Park, 2010 Urban Water Management Plan October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis Table 15 — Water Supply Allocations to Agency Contractors and Customers Annual Amount During Fiscal Year Agency AF % of Tota I Prime Contractors (1) Santa Rosa 29,100 33.24% North Marin 14,100 16.11% Petaluma 13,400 15.31% Rohnert Park 7,500 8.57% Cotati 1,520 1.74% Valley of the Moon 3,200 3.66% Sonoma 3,000 3.43% Windsor 5,620 6.42% Other Customers 2 Larkfield Cal Am 700 0.80% Forestville Water District 500 0.57% Kenwood Water District 12 0.01% Lawndale Water District 86 0.10% Penn rove Water Company 278 0.32% Marin Municipal Water District 8,500 9.71% Small Non -Surplus Customers 16 0.02% Total 87.532 100.00% (1) From the Restructured Water Supply Agreement (2006) (2) From the Agency's 2010 UWMP Table 3-2 27 The Agency's primary source of supply is from the underflow of the Russian River. In order to facilitate year-round underflow, Russian River water is stored behind Warm Springs Dam for later release from Lake Sonoma and behind Coyote Dam for later release from Lake Mendocino. These dams are federal projects under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Agency is the local sponsor and partners with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the water supply portion of the reservoir projects. The Agency owns and operates the water supply pools at both Lake Sonoma and Lake Mendocino. The water supply pool of Lake Sonoma is 212,000 acre-feet and Lake Mendocino is 111,000 acre-feet. The Agency also owns and operates three groundwater supply wells located in the Santa Rosa Valley Groundwater Basin, which provide emergency supply. The Agency uses about 14 miles of the natural channel of Dry Creek and about 8 miles of the natural channel of the Russian River to convey water from Lake Sonoma to six radial collector wells at its Wohler and Mirabel production facilities. An important method used to increase production capacity during peak demand months involves raising an inflatable dam on the Russian River near Mirabel that allows for operation of five infiltration ponds that increase the area of infiltration along the Russian River. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 28 A system of aqueducts, booster pumps and tanks then distribute the water to the various water contractors and other system customers. The major pipelines that comprise the transmission system are known as the Santa Rosa Aqueduct, the Sonoma Aqueduct, the Petaluma Aqueduct, and the Russian River to Cotati Intertie. The Water Agency owns the northern portion of the North Marin Aqueduct that extends from the terminus of the Petaluma Aqueduct to the Kastania Booster Station, located near the border of Marin County with Sonoma County. The remainder of the North Marin Aqueduct is owned and maintained by the North Marin Water District, which transfers water to the District's service area. The City's water supply comes through the Petaluma Aqueduct and the Russian River to Cotati Intertie, which serve the cities of Rohnert Park, Cotati, and Petaluma, the North Marin Water District and Marin Municipal Water District. The Water Agency's major storage facilities are located at Ralphine (36 MG), Cotati (36 MG), Kawana Springs (20 MG), Kastania (12 MG), Sonoma (10 MG), Eldridge (8.0 MG), and Annadel (5.5 MG). The Agency is responsible for the planning, environmental review, design, and construction of capital improvement projects that support its water supply and transmission system and allow it to deliver the water necessary to meet its contractors' and customers' current and planned demands. In order to execute this responsibility, the Agency has developed a Capital Projects Plan. The Capital Projects Plan addresses improvements to the water supply and transmission system, as well as improvements to other Agency infrastructure, including flood control and sanitation facilities. The improvements include the work necessary to provide a reliable water supply including compliance with increasing environmental regulations and compliance with the Russian River Watershed Biological Opinion which was issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service in September 2008. The Agency's Capital Projects Plan is organized to present investments in water supply, which benefit all contractors and customers, and transmission system improvements, which uniquely benefit different customers and contractors, depending on which portions of the system they use. The transmission system improvements are further broken down to reflect "common improvements" and improvements to unique portions of the pipeline and storage system. The City will have a share in water supply improvements, common transmission system improvements and pipeline and storage improvements related to the Petaluma Aqueduct and the Russian River to Cotati Intertie. Table 16 illustrates the percentage shares in the various types of improvements, based on each contractor's and customer's share of the water supply. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 29 Table 16 - Contractor and Customer Share of Agency Capital Project Improvements %Share of Water Annual Amount %Share of Supply & Common During Fiscal Year Total Water Transmission (AFY) Supply Improvements Prime Contractors %Share of Russian River Intertie & Petaluma Aqueduct Improvements Santa Rosa 29,100 33.24% 33.24% North Marin 14,100 16.11% 16.11% 31.13% Petaluma 13,400 15.31% 15.31% 29.58% Rohnert Park 7,500 8.57% 8.57% 16.56% Cotati 1,520 1.74% 1.74% 3.36% Valley of the Moon 3,200 1 3.66%1 3.66% 0.61% Sonoma 3,000 1 3.43%1 3.43% 18.76% Windsor 5,620 1 6.42%1 6.42% Other Customers 2 Larkfield Cal Am 700 0.80% 0.80% Forestville Water District 500 0.57% 0.57% Kenwood Water District 12 0.01% 0.01% Lawndale Water District 86 0.10% 0.10% Penn rove Water Company 278 0.32% 0.32% 0.61% Marin Municipal Water District 8,500 9.71% 9.71% 18.76% Small Non -Surplus Customers 16 0.02% 0.02% Total 87,532 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% (1) From the Restructured Water Supply Agreement (2006) (2) From the Agency's 2010 UWMP Table 3-2 Capital Improvements for Water Supply The projects that the Agency describes in its "water supply" category include activities that allow it to maintain and expand its water storage and diversion system in accordance with legal and environmental regulations. The Agency's Capital Projects Plan includes: • Two phases of habitat enhancement on Dry Creek, intended to comply with the Biological Opinion and allow continued use of the Dry Creek channel for moving water to the Wohler and Mirabel production facilities; • A fish passage project on Wallace Creek, a tributary of Dry Creek, intended to comply with the Biological Opinion and allow continued use of the Dry Creek channel for moving water to the Wohler and Mirabel production facilities; and • A Dry Creek Bypass Pipeline, which may be necessary to comply with the Biological Opinion, if habitat enhancement efforts are not successful. The Capital Projects Plan fully funds the two phases of the habitat enhancement project and the fish passage projects. It also includes initial investments in the bypass pipeline. However, October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 30 because the bypass pipeline project may not be needed, if the habitat enhancement and fish passage projects are successful, the Agency has not included the full construction cost of the Dry Creek Pipeline in the "funded" portion of its Capital Projects Plan. Current system customers are not currently paying for this improvement because it may not be necessary. Capital Improvements for Common Transmission Facilities The projects that the Agency describes in its "common facilities" for the transmission system allow it to maintain and expand the portions of the transmission system that are necessary to serve all contractors and customers. These include: • Six projects to mitigate potential hazards from seismic activity and liquefaction; • A project to upgrade the disinfection system at its collector wells; • A new storage tank near Forestville; • Replacement of the fish screen at the Mirabel production facilities to comply with the Biological Opinion; • Surge protection improvements at the Mirabel production facilities; and • Meter replacement throughout the transmission system. These projects are fully funded. Capital Improvements for Transmission and Storage Facilities on the Petaluma Aqueduct and Russian River — Cotati Intertie The projects that the Agency describes in its "transmission and storage facilities" include a range of projects in different areas of its aqueduct system. Two projects, both for cathodic protection, are included for the Petaluma Aqueduct and the Russian River to Cotati Intertie. These projects are fully funded. Summary of Improvements to Agency System Table 17 presents a summary of the Agency's planned capital projects, including their beneficiaries and costs. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 31 Table 17 — Summary of Agency's Planned Capital Projects Project Name Benefits Supply Transmission System Funded Total Funded Future Unfunded Common Facilities Storage & Pipeline Facilities Water Supply Projects Dry Creek Habitat Enhancement Mile 1 All $ 8,650,000 $ 8,650,000 Wallace Creek Fish Passage All $ 304,000 $ 304,000 Dry Creek Habitat Enhancement Miles 2 &3 All $ 15,400,000 $ 15,400,000 Dry Creek Bypass Pipeline All $ 250,000 $ 142,180,000 $ 142,430,000 Common Transmission System Projects AirValves Replacement and Upgrade All $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Liquefaction Mitigation All $ 6,401,000 $ 6,401,000 Collector 6 Chlorine Solution Lines All $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Collector 6 Liquefaction Mitigation All $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 Forestville Storage Tank All $ 800,000 $ 800,000 Multi-purpose FacilityatWestside Road &Wohler Bridge All $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 Rupture Protection All $ 2,619,000 $ 2,619,000 Fish Screen Replacement All $ 7,154,000 $ 7,154,000 Surge Control System at the Mirabel Production Facilities All $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 RDS Liquefaction Mitigation All $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Seismic Hazard Mitigation atthe Mark West Creek Crossing All $ 4,046,000 $ 4,046,000 Seismic Hazard Mitigation atthe Russian River Crossing All $ 4,007,000 $ 4,007,000 System wide Meter Replacements All $ 1,250,000 $ 1,250,000 Storage & Pipeline Projects Petaluma Aqueduct Cathodic Protection Petaluma Aqueduct & Russian River- Cotati Intertie $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 Russian River Cotati Intertie Cathodic Protection Petaluma Aqueduct & Russian River- Cotati Intertie $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 Totals 1 $ 24,604,000 $ 142,180,000 $ 39,977,000 $ 2,400,000 $ 209,161,000 Water Distribution System Potable water from the Agency's transmission system and City wells is delivered to customers through the retail distribution system, which includes pipelines, pumping and storage facilities. In order to meet the needs of planned development, the City identified improvements to its retail pipeline system and included those costs in its 2011 PFFP. Because of this, retail pipeline improvement costs are not included in this analysis. In addition to improvements to the retail pipeline system, the City has also identified the need for water storage improvements to serve new development (the City has adequate storage to serve existing development). These include October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charqe Analvsis 32 individual tanks and pumping systems which were not included in the PFFP. Table 18 presents a summary of these facilities. Additional detail is included in Appendix A. Table 18 — Summary of Water Storage Tank Improvements Development Area Tank Size (gallon) %of Total Costs Cost per gallon Well Field Infrastucture Total Cost Northeast Specific Plan 630,000 $ 3.56 $ 2,240,000 Southeast Specific Plan 360,000 $ 5.55 $ 1,997,000 Northwest Specific Plan Area 640,000 $ 3.55 $ 2,270,000 University District Specific Plan 833,000 $ 6.00 $ 4,994,000 Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan Area 245,000 $ 5.55 $ - Sonoma Mountain Village Planned Development 970,000 $ 2.93 $ 2,840,000 Stadium Area Planned Development 318,000 $ 4.87 $ - Total $ 14,341,000 Summary of Water System Improvements and Costs Table 19 summarizes the costs for various water system components and their percentage of the total program cost. By far the largest single cost component is the Agency's future bypass pipeline which is unfunded, because it may not need to be constructed (see discussion in Section 3.2). Because this future project may not be needed to serve either new or existing development, these costs are not included in the capacity charge program. Table 19 — Summary of Water System Improvement Components Improvement Total Cost %of Total Costs Cost Included in City's Program Well Field Infrastucture $ 26,236,593 10.5% $ 26,236,593 Agency Water Supply - Funded $ 24,604,000 9.9% $ 24,604,000 Agency Water Supply - Unfunded (Future Pipeline) $ 142,180,000 56.9% $ - Agency Transmission System - Common $ 39,977,000 16.0% $ 39,977,000 Agency Transmission System - Pipelines & Storage $ 2,400,000 1.0% $ 2,400,000 Local Water Tanks $ 14,341,000 5.7% $ 14,341,000 Totals $ 249, 738, 593 100.0% $ 107, 558, 593 2.3 Method for Allocating Costs For capital improvements associated with water capacity, costs are allocated based on relative water demand. The City's UWMP is its primary planning tool for analyzing and projecting water October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 33 demands, including unit demand factors. Due to the requirements of California's Water Code Section 10910 et. seq., there is a strong linkage between the City's UWMP, any Water Supply Assessments (WSAs) prepared to support or augment the UWMP, and the environmental evaluations for new development projects. The City has been diligent in its implementation of these requirements and has prepared the following water supply planning documents: • 2004 Citywide Water Supply Assessment • 2005 Urban Water Management Plan • 2010 Urban Water Management Plan.' These documents have been used to support various plans and environmental documents prepared by each of the SPAs and PDs. As a result, there are a number of unit demand factors that have been published for new development proposals, which are summarized in Table 20. Table 20 - Summary of Water Demand Factors from Various Plans Planning Document Water Demand Factors SFR MFR CIISource pd/unit polunit 2010 UWMP* 287 143 ** 12010 28 pd/employee UWMP Water Demand Analysis and Water Conservation Update (UWMP Appendix B) - Figure 5 Baseline demands before conservation 2004/05 WSA/UWMP 282-351 155 1950 pd/acre 2004 WSA Tables 4-1 and 4-2 dated 1/2004 Northeast SPA 287 143 NA NESPA calculations by applicant dated 2/12/12 University District SPA 282-351 155 1950 d/acre UD Draft and Final EIRs rely on 2004 WSA Southeast SPA 285-360 160 1950 d/acre SESPA Draft EIR dated 12/2005 Wilfred Dowdell SPA 1950 pd/acre Relies on 2004 WSA Northwest SPA 160 50-125 pd/tsf Dahlin Group submittal on behalf of applicant dated 5/06/08 Stadium Lands PD 160 1950 d/acre Stadium Lands Final EIR 10/2007 Sonoma Mountain Village PD 1 154-253 152 30-140 pd/tsf Sonoma Mountain Village Water Plan (2009) - Table F. Includes green building standards and offsets from rainwater, graywater and recycled water * 95 gallons per capita per day total use multiplied by average household size of 3.06 persons. 59% of usage is indoor usage. ** 70 gallons per capita per day total use multiplied by average household size of 2.04 persons. 78% of usage is indoor usage. Table 20 illustrates that, with the exception of the Sonoma Mountain Village PD, the baseline unit demand factors included in the 2010 UWMP are generally lower than the unit demands presented in earlier planning documents. This reflects the City's efforts to increase water conservation, which has reduced overall water demand in the period between 2004 and 2010. Sonoma Mountain Village's Water Plan generally includes lower unit water demand values. Sonoma Mountain Village developed detailed calculations on its water conservation strategy within its Water Plan and committed to implementing these strategies as part of its development Due to the provisions of the Water Conservation Act of 2009, the City's 2010 Urban Water Management Plan was actually adopted in June of 2011. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 34 approvals. As such, the Sonoma Mountain Village PD demands cannot be compared to those of other developments until the effects of conservation are fully taken into account. Conservation in the UWMP The City's 2010 UWMP conformed to the requirements of the Water Conservation Act of 2009, and presented its baseline water demands, its water conservation targets for 2015 and 2020 and its plan for achieving these targets through the implementation of various water conservation measures. Within its 2010 UWMP, the City calculated its required water conservation targets using both an individual and a regional methodology. The individual methodology resulted in a 2015 interim target of 140 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) and 2020 final target of 119 gpcd. The regional methodology resulted in a 2015 interim target of 142 gpcd and a 2020 final target of 129 gpcd. In adopting its 2010 UWMP, the City elected to use the regional methodology for the purposes of complying with the reporting requirements of the Water Conservation Act of 2009.8 As indicated in Table 20, the average per capita water demands documented in the City's 2010 UWMP are currently below the adopted targets. This indicates that the City will be able to meet or exceed its adopted targets if it can maintain its current level of water conservation performance. Currently, the City is implementing a water conservation program based on six best management practices (BMPs) targeted at existing customers. These include: • BMP 1 - Residential Water Surveys — Interior and Outdoor • BMP 2 - Plumbing Retrofit Kits • BMP 5a - Large Landscape Water Budgets • BMP 6 - Washer Rebates • BMP 7 - Residential Public Education • BMP 9 - Commercial Water Audits. Appendix B of the 2010 UWMP (the Maddaus Report) included an analysis of six different future water conservation programs in order to allow the City to evaluate options for maintaining conservation performance. Within its 2010 UWMP, the City used the conservation savings projected from a program called "Tier 1 + New Development" to demonstrate that it would meet or exceed its water use targets. The "Tier 1 + New Development" program includes continuation of the City's existing program, addition of BMP 14 - Single and Multifamily Toilet Replacement and eight measures focused exclusively on new development. The New Development Measures are: • ND 1 — Irrigation System Rain Sensor Requirement • ND 2 — Smart Irrigation Controller Requirement • ND 3 — High Efficiency Toilet Requirement • ND 4 — High Efficiency Dishwasher Requirement 8 City of Rohnert Park Resolution 2011-48 adopted June 14, 2011. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis • ND 5 — High Efficiency Washing Machine Requirement • ND 6 — Hot Water on Demand Requirement • ND 7 — High Efficiency Faucet and Showerhead Requirement • ND 8 — Landscape and Irrigation Requirements 35 The "Tier 1 + New Development" program's blend of measures, targeted at both new and existing development, is particularly effective for the City because it has significant planned development potential within its service area. The 2010 UWMP estimates that with full implementation of the "Tier 1 + New Development" program, the 2015 and 2020 water use will be 102 gpcd, which is significantly below the City's adopted targets of 140 and 129 gpcd, respectively. This indicates that City could expect to meet its targets even if it did not fully implement all aspects of the "Tier 1 + New Development" program. Accounting for Conservation in the Capacity Charge Program The City has not adopted a "new development ordinance", which would specifically impose all the New Development measures modeled in the Maddaus Report on developers. Within its 2010 UWMP, the City indicated that its plan for implementing the New Development measures is based on its use of the Cal Green Building Code. The City has adopted the Cal Green Building Code and it became effective January 1, 2011.9 There is significant overlap between the New Development measures modeled in the Maddaus Report and the Cal Green Code. This overlap is presented in Table 21, which illustrates that the City will be able to achieve New Development Measures 2, 3 ,7, and 8 through Cal Green but it may need additional authority to impose New Development Measure 1, 4 ,5 and 6. In order to appropriately account for the conservation savings that are likely to be experienced given the City's existing authority, water conservation savings for new development are projected based on the implementation of New Development Measures 2, 3, 7 and 8. Table 21 — New Development Conservation Measures and Cal Green References ND Measure Cal Green Requirement* Cal Green Checklist Source ND 1 Irrigation Rain Sensor Requirement No ND 2 Smart Irrigation Controller Requirement Yes 4.304.1, 5.304.3 ND 3 High Efficiency Toilet Requirement Yes 4.303.1, 4.303.3, 5.303.2, 5.303.3 ND 4 High Efficiency Dishwasher Requirement No ND 5 High Efficiency Washing Machine Requirement No ND 6 Hot Water on Demand Requirement No ND 7 High Efficiency Faucet & Showerhead Requirement Yes 4.303.1, A4.303.1,5.303.2, 5.303.6 ND 8 Landscaae & Irriaation Reauirements Yes 4.304.1. A4.303.1. 5.303.1 * These measures are mandatory per the City's Cal Green checklists. The Maddaus Report indicates that the expected water conservation savings from ND 2 Smart Irrigation Controllers is 15% and the expected water conservation savings from ND 8 Landscape and Irrigation Requirements is 10% bringing total outdoor savings to 25%. The efficacy of water conservation savings from ND 3 High Efficiency Toilets and ND 7 High 9 2010 UWMP Section 3.4 October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 36 Efficiency Faucets and Showerheads can be estimated using the methodology outlined in the Cal Green Code, which is presented in Table 22. Table 22 - Estimated Water Conservation Savings from New Development Measures 3 and 7 Baseline Water Use Cal Green Worksheet WS -1 Base Use Rate* Units Duration Units Daily Uses Occupancy" Total Use pd SFR Indoor Use Toilet 1.6gallons/flush 1 flushes 3 3.06 14.7 Shower 2.5gallons/minute 8 minutes 1 3.06 61.2 Bathroom Sink 2.2ngallons/flush 0.25 minutes 3 3.06 5.0 Kitchen Sink 2.2 4 minutes 1 3.06 26.9 Total Targeted SFR Indoor Uses 107.8 MFR Indoor Use Toilet 1.6 1 flushes 3 2.04 9.8 Shower 2.5gallons/minute 8 minutes 1 2.04 40.8 Bathroom Sink 2.2gallons/minute 0.25 minutes 3 2.04 3.4 Kitchen Sink 2.2gallons/minute 4 minutes 1 2.04 18.0 Total Targeted MFR Indoor Uses 72.0 Reduced Water Use Cal Green Worksheet WS -2 Efficiency Rate*** Units Duration Units Daily Uses Occupancy* Total Use pd SFR Indoor Use Toilet 1.28gallons/flush 1 flushes 3 3.06 11.8 Shower 2.0gallons/minute 8 minutes 1 3.06 49.0 Bathroom Sink 1.5 gallons/minutel 0.25 minutes 3 3.06 3.4 Kitchen Sink 1.5gallons/minute 4 minutes 1 3.06 18.4 Total Targeted SFR Indoor Uses 82.6 MFR Indoor Use Toilet 1.28gallons/flush 1 flushes 3 2.04 7.8 Shower 2.0gallons/minute 8 minutes 1 2.04 32.6 Bathroom Sink 1.5gallons/minute 0.25 minutes 3 2.04 2.3 Kitchen Sinkl 1.5gallons/minute 4 minutes 1 2.04 12.2 Total Targeted MFR Indoor Uses 54.9 Total Projected Savings Baseline - Reduced Water Use Baseline Reduced Total Savings d gpd gpd SFR Indoor 107.8 82.6 25.2 MFR Indoor 72.0 54.9 17.1 *Indoor Base Use Rates are EPA standards set by 1992 or 2005 Act ** Cal Green requires that occupancy be counted as 2 persons for the 1 st bedroom and 1 person for each additional bedroom. This initial analysis is based on City's average population for type of unit. Project specific calculations requires use of Cal Green occupancies *** Efficiency Rate is based on USEPA Energy Star Standards October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 37 The water use factors, including conservation, are developed by applying the anticipated conservation savings to the baseline water use documented in the City's 2010 UWMP. This calculation is illustrated in Table 23. Table 23 — Water Use Factors with Conservation 1 UWMP Water Use Factors Total Indoor Outdoor SFR 287.0 169.3 117.7 MFR 143.0 111.5 31.5 2 New Development Indoor Conservation Savings Table 24 SFR 1 25.21 25.21 0.0 MFR 1 17.11 17.11 0.0 3 New Develo ment Outdoor Conservation Savings Maddaus SFR 1 29.41 0.01 29.4 MFR 1 7.91 0.01 7.9 4 New Develo ment Water Use Factors 1 - 2+3 SFR 1 232.41 144.11 88.3 MFR 1 118.01 94.41 23.6 This calculation illustrates that with the application of the new development conservation measures, new residential development can be expected to produce demands ranging from approximately 118 to 234 gallons per day which is similar to the range of performance specifically articulated in Sonoma Mountain Village's Water Plan and indicates that a single water use factor is appropriate for the capacity charge program. Irrigation Accounts The City requires separate irrigation meters on large irrigation accounts. These irrigation accounts are in addition to residential and commercial, industrial and institutional (CII) accounts, and typically serve parks, schools and landscaped common spaces. While the irrigation accounts contribute to the overall water demand, including water demand in new developments, the irrigated areas typically serve to meet conditions of development and would not exist in the absence of new residential and non-residential development. Because new irrigated areas, and the attendant new water demand, exist to support the new residential and non-residential development, not as an independent development feature, these accounts are not assigned demand factors for the purpose of calculating capacity charges. Accounting for Water Recycling As described above, the City hosts an urban recycled water system that was installed in the 1990s. Recycled water is used for irrigation of large non-residential landscapes including parks October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 38 and school grounds, various commercial and industrial sites, and the Foxtail Golf Course. Recycled water use offsets historic demands on the City's potable water system. Both the Stadium Lands PD and the Sonoma Mountain Village PD are connected to the recycled water system. Within its 2005 and 2010 UWMPs, the City anticipated that an additional 300 acre-feet per year of recycled water could be used for urban irrigation, primarily for new landscaping, parks and common areas. As described above, this type of use is supportive of new development and no special demand factor or "credit" is assigned when recycled water is used to replace potable water in an irrigation account. Development of the expanded recycled water supply requires significant coordination with the Santa Rosa Subregional System, which produces the recycled water, and a significant capital expenditure. The timing of this expansion project is not certain. As a result potable water may be used for some period of time to service new irrigation accounts, which is another reason that a special "credit" is not given for expanded recycled water system. Water Demand Factors for the Capacity Charge Program The water demand factors for the capacity charge program are calculated as follows. Water Demand factors are established based on the 2010 UWMP with adjustments made for planned conservation. Residential conservation has been calculated based on the implementation of planned conservation measures. Nonresidential conservation is estimated to result in a 20% savings from the base demand because of the requirements of the Water Conservation Act of 2009. These factors are presented in Table 24. Table 24 - Water Demand Factors Land Use Category Base Unit Demand Demand with Conservation Savings Source of Conservation Savin s pd pd Single Family Residential EA 287.0 232.4 2010 UWMP with New Development Conservation Measures Multi -Family Residential EA 1 143.0 118.0 12010 UWMP with New Development Conservation Measures Nonresidential Use Employeel 28.0 22.4 12010 UWMP with assumed 20% savings 2. Because non-residential demands are calculated on a per employee basis, the new employees projected in the General Plan are allocated to each SPA, PD and Infill Development based on the total new non-residential square footage associated with each. This calculation is illustrated in Table 25. As a matter of comparison, the 2011 PFFP predicts a total of 27,308 new employees (based on a ratio of approximately 3 employees per 1,000 square feet). The water October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 39 capacity charges will be based on 25,831 new employees. This reduction is a result of the reduced land uses in the Northwest SPA. Table 25 - Nonresidential Land Uses — Employee Allocations Notes: 1. From PFF 2011 Land Use Classes. This "2011 Base" Square Footage of Nonresidential Land Uses is used with the "2011 Base" number of Employees Associated with New Development to extrapolate employee ratio to non-residential new development. 2. From Table 15 - Water Capacity Charge Land Use. Includes adjustments to NW SPA and SMV PD due to land use conversions as described in this report. 3. 2011 Base includes the 700,000 square feet that exist in the Sonoma Mountain Village PD 4. Includes infill outside of the Stadium Lands PD, Sonoma Mountain Village PD, and Central Rohnert Park PDA. 3. Because cost allocations will be based on demand, which is indicative of infrastructure impacts, the water demand factors presented in Table 24 are applied to new and existing land uses. This is illustrated in Table 26. Table 27 provides additional breakdown for each SPA and PD. October 2016 Nonresidential Land Uses Square Footage Planned New 2011 Base' Buildout 2 Development Employees Associated with New Development Planned New 2011 Base Buildout Development Citywide Totals 6,806,303 8,267,468 1,461,165 21,900 25,831 3,931 NE SPA - - - UD SPA - 175,000 175,000 259 SE SPA - 10,000 10,000 15 WD SPA 302,114 302,114 446 NW SPA - 789,300 789,300 1,166 Stadium Lands - 140,000 140,000 207 Sonoma Mountain Villa e 3 700,000 175,244 175,244 259 Central Rohnert Park PDA - 764,473 764,473 1,130 Subtotal SPAs and PDs 700,000 2,356,131 2,356,131 3,482 Other Infill 4 - 303,874 303,874 449 Totals 2,660,005 1 2,660,005 3,931 Notes: 1. From PFF 2011 Land Use Classes. This "2011 Base" Square Footage of Nonresidential Land Uses is used with the "2011 Base" number of Employees Associated with New Development to extrapolate employee ratio to non-residential new development. 2. From Table 15 - Water Capacity Charge Land Use. Includes adjustments to NW SPA and SMV PD due to land use conversions as described in this report. 3. 2011 Base includes the 700,000 square feet that exist in the Sonoma Mountain Village PD 4. Includes infill outside of the Stadium Lands PD, Sonoma Mountain Village PD, and Central Rohnert Park PDA. 3. Because cost allocations will be based on demand, which is indicative of infrastructure impacts, the water demand factors presented in Table 24 are applied to new and existing land uses. This is illustrated in Table 26. Table 27 provides additional breakdown for each SPA and PD. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 40 Table 26 - Water Demand Factors for New and Existing Development Table 27 - Water Demand Factors by SPA and PD Land Use Class Demand Factor Units UD SPA Capacity Factors pd Water Use Factor Percent Share Land Use Class Existing Planned Buildout New Development Existing New Existing New Existing New Residential Units Total Demand Factor I Units Total Demand Factor lUnIts Total Demand Factor Total Demand Units Factor Units Total Demand Factor Single Family Residential units 7,719 10,343 2,624 287.0 232.4 2,215,353 609,772 43% 12% Multi -Family Residential units 8,594 11,483 2,889 143.0 118.0 1,228,942 341,003 24% 7% Senior Housing units 2071 209 2 143.0 118.0 29,601 236 1% 0% Assisted Living units 0 135 135 143.0 118.0 - 15,935 0% 0% Non -Residential Employees 21,900 25,831 3,931 28.0 22.4 613,200 88,054 12% 2% Totals Total 1 237,399 300,9381 101,456 4,087,096 1,055,000 79% 21% Table 27 - Water Demand Factors by SPA and PD Land Use Class Demand Factor NE SPA UD SPA SE SPA WD SPA NW SPA Stadium Lands SMV Central Rohnerl Park Units Total Demand Factor I Units Total Demand Factor Units Total Demand Factor Units Total Demand Factor I Units Total Demand Factor lUnIts Total Demand Factor Total Demand Units Factor Units Total Demand Factor Single Family Residential Units 232.4 920 213,792 883 205,194 394 91,559 378 87,841 - Multi Family Residential Units 118.0 200 23,607 762 89,943 81 9,561 - 398 46,978 338 39,896 275 32,460 835 98,559 Nonresidential (Employee 22.4 - . 2591 5,8021 151 336 446 1 9,990 1,166 26,118 207 1 4,6371 2591 51802 11130 25,312 Total 237,399 300,9381 101,456 9,990 73,096 4,5331 1 126,1021 123,871 2,4 Fee Component Calculations The cost of water system improvements in the capacity charge program is approximately $110 million excluding the unfunded portion of the proposed Dry Creek Pipeline Project in the Agency's Capital Projects Plan. This section describes the fee component calculation for the various capital projects, in the Program. These calculations have been performed for each component because the land uses that benefit vary by component. Groundwater Supply The groundwater supply component consists of buy -in to the existing network that benefits all City customers. This water supply source provides an important element of reliability for both existing and future customers. Table 28 presents the calculation of the groundwater charge component. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 41 Table 28 — Water Capacity Charge Component for Groundwater Supply Total Cost $26,236,593 New Development Share $ 5,382,942 Cost per gpd $ 5.10 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons Sonoma County Water Agency Supply The Agency supply component consists of the City's share of improvements to the water supply, common water transmission and pipeline and storage systems as described in the Agency's Capital Projects Plan. This water supply source provides an important element of reliability for both existing and future customers. There are two steps to calculating the charge component associated with the Agency supply. The first step is to calculate the City's share of the planned capital costs based on its share of the Agency's average annual deliveries, using the information presented in Table 16. Table 29 illustrates the application of the City's share to each element of the Agency's program. October 2016 Units Capacity Factors pd Water Use Factor Percent Share Cost Share Cost per Land Use Unit* Land Use Class Existing Planned New Buildout Development Existing New Existing New Existing New Existing New New Residential Single Family Residential units 7,719 10,343 2,624 287.0 232.4 2,215,353 609,772 43% 12% $11,303,428 $3,111,247 $ 1,185.69 Multi -Family Residential units 8,594 11,483 2,889 143.0 118.0 1,228,942 341,003 24% 7% $ 6,270,449 $1,739,905 $ 602.25 Senior Housing units 207 209 2 143.0 118.0 29,601 236 1% 0% $ 151,034 $ 1,205 $ 602.25 Assisted Living units 0 135 135 143.0 118.0 15,935 0% 0% $ $ 81,304 $ 602.25 Non -Residential Employees 21,900 25,831 3,931 28.0 22.4 613,200 88,054 12% 2% $ 3,128,739 $ 449,281 $ 5.10 Totals I 1 1 4,087,096 1,055,000 79% 21% $20,853,650 $5,382,942 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons Sonoma County Water Agency Supply The Agency supply component consists of the City's share of improvements to the water supply, common water transmission and pipeline and storage systems as described in the Agency's Capital Projects Plan. This water supply source provides an important element of reliability for both existing and future customers. There are two steps to calculating the charge component associated with the Agency supply. The first step is to calculate the City's share of the planned capital costs based on its share of the Agency's average annual deliveries, using the information presented in Table 16. Table 29 illustrates the application of the City's share to each element of the Agency's program. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Table 29 — City Share of Agency Capital Projects Plan 42 Project Name Benefits Supply Transmission System Funded Total City Percent Share City Cost Share Funded Common Facilities Storage & Pipeline From Table 18 Water Supply Projects DryCreek Habitat Enhancement Mile 1 All $ 8,650,000 $ 8,650,000 8.57% $ 741,305 Wallace Creek Fish Passage All $ 304,000 $ 304,000 8.57% $ 26,053 DryCreek Habitat Enhancement Miles 2 &3 All $ 15,400,000 $ 15,400,000 8.57% $ 1,319,780 Dry Creek Bypass Pipeline All $ 250,000 $ 250,000 8.57% $ 21,425 Subtotal Funded Water Supply Projects $ 24,604,000 $ 2,108,563 Common Transmission System Projects Airyalves Replacementand Upgrade All $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 8.57% $ 85,700 Liquefaction Mitigation All $ 6,401,000 $ 6,401,000 8.57% $ 548,566 Collector 6 Chlorine Solution Lines All $ 500,000 $ 500,000 8.57% $ 42,850 Collector Liquefaction Mitigation All $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 8.57% $ 257,100 Forestville Storage Tank All $ 800,000 $ 800,000 8.57% $ 68,560 Multi-purpose FacilityatWestside Road &Wohler Bridge All $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 8.57% $ 102,840 Rupture Protection All $ 2,619,000 $ 2,619,000 8.57% $ 224,448 Fish Screen Replacement All $ 7,154,000 $ 7,154,000 8.57% $ 613,098 Surge Control System at the Mirabel Production Facilities All $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 8.57% $ 257,100 RDS Liquefaction Mitigation All $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 8.57% $ 428,500 Seismic Hazard Mitigation atthe Mark West Creek Crossing All $ 4,046,000 $ 4,046,000 8.57% $ 346,742 Seismic Hazard Mitigation at the Russian River Crossing All $ 4,007,000 $ 4,007,000 8.57% $ 343,400 System wide Meter Replacements All $ 1,250,000 $ 1,250,000 8.57% $ 107,125 Subtotal Common Transmission System Projects $ 39,977,000 $ 3,426,029 Storage & Pipeline Projects Petaluma Aqueduct Cathodic Protection Petaluma Aqueduct & Russian Rive r- Cotati Intertie $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 16.56% $ 198,720 Russian River Cotati Intertie Cathodic Protection Petaluma Aqueduct & Russian Rive r- Cotati Intertie $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 16.56% $ 198,720 Subtotal Storage and Pipeline Projects I 1 1 $ 2,400,0001 1 $ 397,440 Totals 1 1 $ 24,604,000 1 $ 39,977,000 1 $ 2,400,000 1 $ 66,981,000 1 1 $ 5,932,032 Unfunded Agency Projects are not included in the Capacity Charge Program October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 43 The second step is to allocate the City's share of the Agency supply costs over new and existing development. This calculation is illustrated in Tables 30 through 32 which develop the cost allocation for each of the three subcomponents of the Agency's proposed supply improvements. Table 30 — Water Capacity Charge Component for Agency's Funded Water System Improvements Total Cost $ 2,108,563 New Development Share $ 432,612 Cost per gpd $ 0.41 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 Units Capacity Factors pd Water Use Factor Percent Share Cost Share Cost per Land Use Unit* Land Use Class Planned Existing Buildout New Development Existing New Existing New Existing New Existing New New Residential Single Family Residential units 7,719 10,343 2,624 287,0 232.4 2,215,353 609,772 43% 12% $ 908,425 $ 250,042 $ 95.29 Multi -Family Residential units 8,594 11,483 2,889 143.0 118.0 1,228,942 341,003 24% 7% $ 503,939 $ 139,831 $ 48.40 Senior Housing units 207 209 2 143.0 118.0 29,601 236 1% 0% $ 12,138 $ 97 $ 48.40 Assisted Living units 0 135 135 143.0 118.0 15,935 0% 0% $ - $ 6,534 $ 48.40 Non -Residential Employees 21,900 25,831 3,931 28.0 221.41 613,200 88,054 12% 2% $ 251,448 $ 36,108 $ 0.41 Totals 4,087,096 1,055,000 79% 21% $ 1,675,951 $ 432,612 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 44 Table 31 — Water Capacity Charge Component for Agency's Common Transmission System Improvements Total Cost $ 3,426,029 New Development Share $ 702,916 Cost per gpd $ 0.67 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons. October 2016 Units Capacity Factors pd Water Use Factor Percent Share Cost Share Cost per Land Use Unit' Land Use Class Existing Planned PPlan ed New Development Existing New Existing New Existing New Existing New New Residential Single Family Residential units 7,719 10,343 2,624 287.0 232.4 2,215,353 609,772 43% 12% $ 1,476,025 $ 406,273 $ 154.83 Multi -Family Residential units 8,594 11,483 2,889 143.0 118.0 1,228,942 341,003 24% 7% $ 818,808 $ 227,200 $ 78.64 Senior Housing units 207 209 2 143.0 118.0 29,601 236 1% 0% $ 19,722 $ 157 $ 78.64 Assisted Living units 0 135 135 143.0 118.0 15,935 0% 0% $ - $ 10,617 $ 78.64 Non -Residential Employees 21,900 25,831 3,93128.0 22.4 613,200 88,054 12% 2% $ 408,557 $ 58,668 $ 0.67 Totals E4,087,096 1 1,055,000 79% 21% $ 2,723,113 $ 702,916 * For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charge Analysis 45 Table 32 — Water Capacity Charge Component for Agency's Pipeline and Storage Improvements Total Cost $ 397,440 New Development Share $ 81,542 Cost per gpd $ 0.08 Distribution System Improvements The distribution system improvements include five new storage tanks that will serve the various new developments. These are discrete improvements that only benefit new development and the costs are properly apportioned each SPA or PD. Table 33 illustrates this allocation. October 2016 Units Capacity factors pd Water Use Factor Percent Share Cost Share Cost per Land Use Unit* Land Use Class Existing Planned Plann d New Development Existing New Existing New Existing New Existing New New Residential Single Family Residential units 7,719 10,343 2,624 287.0 232.4 2,215,353 609,772 43% 12% $ 171,228 $ 47,130 $ 17.96 Multi -Family Residential units 8,594 11,483 2,889 143.0 118.0 1,228,942 341,003 24% 7% $ 94,987 $ 26,357 $ 9.12 Senior Housing units 207 209 2 143.0 118.0 29,601 236 1% 0% $ 2,288 $ 18 $ 9.12 Assisted Living units 0 135 135 143.0 118.0 15,935 0% 0% $ - $ 1,232 $ 9.12 Non -Residential Employees 21,900 25,831 3,931 28.01 22.41 613,200 88,054 12% 2% $ 47,395 $ 6,806 $ 0.08 Totals I I 1 1 4,087,096 1 1,055,000 79% 21% $ 315,8981 $ 81,542 * For Residential Land Uses the cost oer unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost oer unit is based on aallons. Distribution System Improvements The distribution system improvements include five new storage tanks that will serve the various new developments. These are discrete improvements that only benefit new development and the costs are properly apportioned each SPA or PD. Table 33 illustrates this allocation. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis Table 33 — Water Capacity Charge Component for Storage Tanks Northeast Tank $ 2,240,000 University District Tank $ 4,994,000 Southeast Tank $ 1,997,000 Wilfred Dowdell Tank $ 46 Northwest Tank $2,270,000 Stadium Lands Tank $ - Sonoma Mountain Village Tank $2,840,000 Land Use Class Demand Factor NE SPA UD SPA SE SPA WD SPA NW SPA Stadium Lands SMV NW SPA Stadium Lands Units Total Demand Factor Units Total Demand Factor Units Total Demand Factor Units Total Demand Factor Units Total Demand Factor Total Demand Units Factor Units Total Demand Factor Single Family Residential Units 232 920 213,792 883 205,194 394 91,559 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,113.73 $1,958.76 $2,323.34 $ $3,665.57 378 87,841 Multi Family Residential Units' 118 200 23,607 762 89,943 81 9,561 $2,658.32 Assisted Living units 398 46,978 338 39,896 275 32,460 Nonresidential(Employees)22 $ - - 259 5,802 15 336 446 9,990 1,166 26,118 207 4,637 259 5,802 Totals 237,399 300,938 101,456 9,990 73,096 44,533 126,102 Tank Component by Land Use Class Single Family Residential Units $ 2,192.67 $ 3,856.34 $4,574.10 $ 5,233.60 Multi Family Residential Units* $ 1,113.73 $ 1,958.76 $2,323.34 $3,665.57 $ - $ 2,658.32 Nonresidential gallon $ 9.44 $ 16.59 $ 19.68 $ $ 31.05 $ $ 22.52 2.5 Summary Table 34 summarizes the allocated capacity charges for each of the components in the capacity charge program. Table 34 — Summary of Water Capacity Charge Components For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 Groundwater Charge Component AgencyChar a Components Tank Charge Components Land Use Class Funded Common Water Transmission Supply System Pipelines & Storage NE SPA UD SPA SE SPA WD SPA NW SPA Stadium Lands SMV Residential Single Family Residential units $ 1,185.69 $ 95.29 $ 154.83 $ 17.96 $ 2,192.67 $3,856.34 $4,574.10 $ $ - $ $5,233.60 Multi -Family Residential units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,113.73 $1,958.76 $2,323.34 $ $3,665.57 $ $2,658.32 Senior Housing units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,113.73 $1,958.76 $2,323.34 $ $3,665.57 $ $2,658.32 Assisted Living units $ 602.25 $ 48.40 $ 78.64 $ 9.12 $ 1,113.73 $1,958.76 $2,323.34 $ $3,665.57 $ $2,658.32 Non -Residential (gpd) $ 5.10 $ 0.41 $ 0.67 $ 0.08 $ 9.44 $ 16.59 $ 19.68 $ $ 31.05 $ $ 22.52 For Residential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on an SFR or MFR. For Nonresidential Land Uses the cost per unit is based on gallons October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charge Analysis 2.6 Administrative Allowance 47 The City actively administers the capacity charge program. Administrative activities include: • Annual accounting and reporting as required by Act • Updating participating land uses based on development plans • Updating program costs based on capital plans and construction activities • Updating water use factors • Updating the Water Capacity Charge Analysis and establishing new charges to reflect changes in costs, land use and or water use. Active administration of the program provides a benefit to new development by ensuring that the charges are consistent, predictable, equitable and based on current understanding of costs and land uses. Because administrative activity can vary from time to time, the City uses an administrative allowance in order to budget for these activities. The City's allowance of 3% is based on the 2005 AACE International Transactions10. These transactions document that the "Program Management" costs for a wide range of water and wastewater programs, undertaken over the 30 year period from 1973 to 2002, ran from a low of 1.5% to a high 9.7% with a historical average of 3.2%." The City's allowance is slightly lower than the documented historical range for this type of cost. 10 AACE is the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering " "Controlling Non -Construction Costs", Tables 2 and 3. Peter R. Bredeheoft Jr. 2005 AACE International Transactions. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charge Analysis 48 2.7 Government Code Section 66013 Findings for Water System Improvements While the Water Capacity Charges are not subject to the same nexus requirements as other Mitigation Fees, Government Code Section 66013 (GC 66013) outlines several standards that must be met in order for fees to be established. This section summarizes how the City's proposed Water Capacity Charges meet these standards. Definition of Benefit GC 66013 specifically requires that "charges... benefit ... the person or property being charged". The projects included in this proposed program benefit developing properties because the City will not have adequate, reliable capacity to service new development without investments in its water system. Water supply sufficiency benefits new development because the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that new development document the availability of water supplies. This CEQA requirement has its basis in both legislative mandate (Water Code Section 10910 et. seq.) and case law (Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rancho Cordova). For new development, a defined program to provide sufficient water supply, which includes a clear Capital Improvement Program and funding strategy greatly facilitates both CEQA compliance and project implementation. Water supply reliability benefits new development because findings of supply sufficiency must include an analysis of the ability to manage dry water years and must include a water shortage contingency plan (Water Code Section 10910 et. seq.). A diverse water supply portfolio provides enhanced reliability because the City is not dependent upon a single source or water supplier to meet all needs. Adequate storage system capacity benefits new development because distribution and storage capacity is necessary to deliver the water supply to the development and to provide for fire safety. Facilities that Provide Benefit The City will achieve a reliable, sufficient water supply through investments in groundwater supply, Agency supply and distribution improvements. The specific facilities providing benefit are described below. The City's network of groundwater wells provides up to 2,577 acre-feet annually of water supply that is available to new and existing development. The City's 2004 Citywide WSA and 2005 and 2010 UWMPs illustrate how the available groundwater supply is used in a conjunctively managed fashion to provide capacity for existing users and planned growth. These facilities have largely been constructed and new development will "buy -in" to the groundwater system that provides benefit. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae Analvsis 49 The Agency's water supply system provides up to 7,500 acre-feet annual of water supply that is available to new and existing development. The City's 2004 Citywide WSA and 2005 and 2010 UWMPs illustrate how the City uses its contracted supply from the Agency to provide reliable water service, while maintaining sustainable pumping of the groundwater basin. The Agency's Capital Projects Plan describes improvements to its water supply system, its common transmission system and its distribution and storage system that are necessary to allow it to comply with environmental regulations and deliver its contracted supply volumes. New development will pay a portion of the City's share of the Agency's Capital Project costs, based on the demands created by new development. The new water storage tanks provide benefits to each SPA or PD which include emergency and fire supply and compliance with regulations. Each SPA or PD will fund the cost of the discrete storage improvements required to serve the development. Cost of the Facilities that Provide Benefit GC 66013 specifically limits capacity charges to "the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the ... charge is imposed". The cost estimates included in this Capacity Charge Analysis are supported by the City's valuation of its groundwater network, the Agency's Capital Projects Plan and the requirements of development specific EIRs. In each case, improvement costs have been allocated based on water use projections. When the facilities benefit existing users, this share has been calculated and removed from the costs allocated to new development. This Analysis includes adjustments to avoid duplication with the City's Public Facilities Fee Program. Specifically, recycled water improvements and in -city water distribution system improvements, which have been included in the 2011 PFFP, are not included in this Analysis. October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charqe Appendix A Water Tank Cost Estimate Backup October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae October 2016 Northeast Specific Plan Tank Size (gal) 630,000 Project Description, Notes 0.4 -acre site; 13 ft above grade; 8 ft below grade; 80 -ft diameter ITEM ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT TOTAL 20% CONTINGENCY TOTAL COST NO. CONTINGENCY TOTAL COST COST ITEM COST" 25% MANAGEMENT COST Surface Costs: 25% MANAGEMENT Surface Costs: 1 Mobilization 10 % $ 1,410,000 $ 141,000 $ 63,000 $ 200,000 2 Sitework 1 LS $ 227,000 $ 267,900 $ 121,000 $ 390,000 3 Water Storage Tank 1 EA $ 476,000 $ 561,700 $ 253,000 $ 810,000 4 Pump Station 1 EA $ 270,999 $ 319,800 $ 144,000 $ 460,000 5 Electrical / I&C 1 LS $ 221,000 $ 260,800 $ 117,000 $ 380,000 $ 460,000 5 Electrical / I&C 1 LS $ 225,000 Total Costs $ 2,240,000 The cost of Contractor's Bonds, Insurance, Overhead, and Profit (18%) is included in items 2-5 Cost per gallon (construction) Cost per gallon (complete) $ 2.46 $ 3.56 October 2016 Northwest Preliminary Specific Plan Project Description, Notes Tank Size (gal) 640,000 ITEM ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT TOTAL 20% CONTINGENCY TOTAL COST NO. COST ITEM COST* 25% MANAGEMENT Surface Costs: 1 Mobilization 10 % $1,424,000 $ 142,400 $ 64,000 $ 210,000 2 Sitework 1 LS $ 231,000 $ 272,600 $ 123,000 $ 400,000 3 Water Storage Tank 1 EA $ 480,000 $ 566,400 $ 255,000 $ 820,000 4 Pump Station 1 EA $ 270,999 $ 319,800 $ 144,000 $ 460,000 5 Electrical / I&C 1 LS $ 225,000 $ 265,500 $ 119,000 $ 380,000 Total Costs $ 2,270,000 The cost of Contractor's Bonds, Insurance, Overhead, and Profit (18%) is included in items 2-5 Cost per gallon (construction) Cost per gallon (complete) $ 2.45 $ 3.55 October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae October 2016 University District Specific Plan Project Description, Notes Tank Size (gal) 833,000 ITEM ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT TOTAL 10% CONTINGENCY TOTAL COST NO. NO. COST ITEM COST * 25% MANAGEMENT 0% Surface Costs: Surface Costs: 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 95,000 $ 95,000 $ 33,000 $ 128,000 2 Sitework 1 LS $ 1,850,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 648,000 $ 2,498,000 3 Water Storage Tank 1 EA I $ 1,484,000 1 $ 1,484,000 1 $ 519,000 $ 2,003,000 4 Pump Station 0 EA 1 $ $ $ - $ - 5 Electrical / I&C 1 LS 1 $ 270,000 1 $ 270,000 $ 95,000 $ 365,000 Electrical / I&C 1 LS $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ Total Costs $ 4,994,000 Follow s bond estimate prepared by McKay & Somps- 08/2015 w ith adjustments for inflation Cost per gallon (construction) Cost per gallon (complete) $ 4.44 $ 6.00 October 2016 Southeast Specific Plan Project Description, Notes Tank Size (gal) 360,000 ITEM ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT TOTAL 5% CONTINGENCY TOTAL COST NO. COST ITEM COST* 0% MANAGEMENT Surface Costs: 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 2,000 $ 32,000 2 Sitework 1 LS $ 358,000 $ 358,000 $ 18,000 $ 376,000 3 Water Storage Tank 1 EA 1 $ 810,000 1 $ 810,000 1 $ 41,000 1 $ 851,000 4 Pump Station 1 EA $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ 20,000 $ 410,000 5 Electrical / I&C 1 LS $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ 16,000 $ 328,000 Total Costs $ 1,997,000 Follows Bond Estimate Prepared by Civil Design Consultants - 05/10/2016 Cost per gallon (construction) Cost per gallon (complete) $ 5.28 $ 5.55 October 2016 City of Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charae October 2016 Sonoma Mountain Village Planned Development Tank Size (gal) 970,000 Project Description, Notes Tank shall be a welded steel tank conforming to AWWA D100-05 WELDED CARBON STEEL TANKS FOR WATER STORAGE Tank shall be entirely above ground. ITEM ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT TOTAL 20% CONTINGENCY TOTAL COST NO. COST ITEM COST* 25% MANAGEMENT Surface Costs: 1 Mobilization 10 % $ 1,784,000 $ 178,400 $ 80,000 $ 260,000 2 Sitework 1 LS $ 350,000 $ 413,000 $ 186,000 $ 600,000 3 Water Storage Tank 1 EA $ 550,000 $ 649,000 $ 292,000 $ 940,000 4 Pump Station 1 EA $ 270,999 $ 319,800 $ 144,000 $ 460,000 5 Electrical / I&C 1 LS $ 341,000 $ 402,400 $ 181,000 $ 580,000 Total Costs $ 2,840,000 The cost of Contractor's Bonds, Insurance, Overhead, and Profit (18%) is included in items 2-5 Cost per gallon (construction) $ 2.02 Cost per gallon (complete) $ 2.93 October 2016 RESOLUTION EXHIBIT B Table 1: Residential Fees Table 2: Non -Residential Fees Infill East of Hwy 101 Infill West of Hwy 101 Northeast Specific Plan University District Specific Plan Southeast Specific Plan Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan Northwest Specific Plan Stadium Lands Planned Development Sonoma Mountain Village Planned Development Single Family Residential (units) $1,497.38 $1,497.38 $3,755.83 $5,469.41 $6,208.71 NA NA NA $6,887.99 Multi -Family Residential (units) $760.57 $760.57 $1,907.71 $2,778.10 $3,153.611 NA 1 $4,536.111 $760.571 $3,498.65 Senior Housing (units) $760.57 $760.57 $1,907.71 $2,778.10 $3,153.61 NA $4,536.11 $760.57 $3,498.65 Assisted Living (units) $760.57 $760.57 $1,907.71 $2,778.10 $3,153.61 NA $4,536.11 $760.57 $3,498.65 Table 2: Non -Residential Fees Sonoma Mountain Stadium Lands Village Infill East of Hwy Infill West of Hwy Northeast University District Southeast Wilfred Dowdell Northwest Planned Planned 101 101 Specific Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan Development Development Non Residential (per gpd) $6.44 $6.44 $16.16 $23.54 $26.72 $6.44 $38.43 $6.44 $29.64 City Council ATTACHMENT 4 to City Council Item October 14, 2016 Dear Property Owner and/or Development Community Representative, The City of Rohnert Park is committed to keeping property owners and stakeholders in the development community informed about proposed changes that may affect future projects. To this end, City staff is holding an informational meeting: Building Fee Updates and Water Capacity Charge Program Monday, October 24, 2016, 2:30 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. Council Chambers, Rohnert Park City Hall, 130 Avram Avenue Gina Belforte Water Capacity Charge fee program. The City currently administers two fee Mayor The specific topics to be covered include the following: Jake Mackenzie Fees related to the adoption of 2016 California Building Standards Code. The Vice Mayor City is considering the adoption of the 2016 California Building Standards Code Amy 0. Ahanotu ("Building Code"), amended to reflect local conditions, and also amending Ch. 15 of Joseph T. Callinan the Rohnert Park Municipal Code. The implementation of the updated Building Code Pam Stafford will require City staff to provide compliance services, and in turn, new fees to recover Councilmembers costs associated with these services. The proposed fees are related to work without Karen W. Murphy permits, change of occupancy and use, water meter permits, and expired permits and Assistant City Attorney corrections. (See Attachment A, Building Fee Schedule — New/Revised Fees.) Darrin Jenkins Water Capacity Charge fee program. The City currently administers two fee City Manager programs to fund improvements to its water system. These are the "Per Acre Fee" program, currently set at $17,715 per undeveloped acre and the "Water/Wastewater Don Schwartz Conservation Fee" program, currently set at $325 per new residential unit or $1,625 Assistant City Manager per non-residential acre. In addition, developers within the City's Specific Plan and Michelle Marchetta Kenyon Planned Development Areas have also been conditioned to construct new water City Attorney storage tanks. The City proposes replacing these fee programs with a new Water Capacity Charge program developed to cover the specific water supply and water Karen W. Murphy storage tank facilities needed for new development. (See Attachment A, Water Assistant City Attorney Capacity Charges, Tables 1 & 2 for the proposed fees.) The City has made a comparative analysis of the current and proposed programs and, in general, the new JoAnne Buergler charges will result in slightly lower costs for the development community than the City Clerk current system. (See Attachment B.) Betsy Howze Finance Director The City Council is scheduled to consider and adopt the updated Building Code and associated fees, as well as the Water Capacity Charge program and repeal of the old Brian Masterson fees, at a public hearing held at 6:00 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at City Hall, Director of Public Safety 130 Avram Avenue in Rohnert Park. John McArthur Director of Public Works and We encourage you to attend our October 24t" informational meeting g y g so we may Community Services provide you answers to any questions you may have prior to the November 8t" public hearing. You are also welcome to contact me directly to discuss the programs. I can Mary Grace Pawson be reached at (707) 588-2234. Director of Development Services Victoria Perrault Sincerely, Human Resources Director Mary Grace Pawson, PE Director of Development Services — City of Rohnert Park mpawson(a_rpcity.orq (707) 588-2234 130 Avram Avenue ♦ Rohnert Park CA ♦ 94928 ♦ (707) 588-2226 ♦ Fax (707) 792-1876 www.rpcity.org Outstanding Corrections Residential All Other Occupancies Expired Permits or Certifications Residential All Other Occupancies Work without Permits ATTACHMENT A $100.00 $250.00 $100.00 $250.00 Double the cost of base plan review and inspection fee Building Department Board of Appeals Requests Residential $500.00 All Other Occupancies $1,000.00 Change of Occupancy or Use Permit All Occupancies $350.00 Water Meter Permit Residential $500.00 Table 1: Residential Fees Table 2: Non -Residential Fees Infill East of Hwy 101 Infill West of Hwy 101 Northeast Specific Plan University District Specific Plan Southeast Specific Plan Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan Northwest Specific Plan Stadium Lands Planned Development Sonoma Mountain Village Planned Development Single Family Residential (units) $1,497.38 $1,497.38 $3,755.83 $5,469.41 $6,208.71 $1,497.38 $1,497.38 $1,497.38 $6,887.99 Multi -Family Residential (units) $760.57 $760.57 $1,907.71 $2,778.10 $3,153.61 $760.57 $4,536.11 $760.57 $3,498.65 Senior Housing (units) $760.57 $760.57 $1,907.71 $2,778.10 $3,153.61 $760.57 $4,536.11 $760.57 $3,498.65 Assisted Living (units) $760.57 $760.57 $1,907.71 $2,778.10 $3,153.61 $760.57 $4,536.11 $760.57 $3,498.65 Table 2: Non -Residential Fees Sonoma Mountain Stadium Lands Village Infill East of Hwy Infill West of Hwy Northeast University District Southeast Wilfred Dowdell Northwest Planned Planned 101 101 Specific Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan Development Development Non Residential (per gpd) $6.44 $6.44 $16.16 $23.54 $26.72 $6.44 $38.43 $6.44 $29.64 ATTACHMENT B Rohnert Park Water Capacity Charge Analysis - Comparative Summary of Existing and Proposed Fee Structure Savings (New Charges with Tanks - Existing Fees with Tanks) $ (2,588,219) $ (3,739,532) $ (869,300) $ (414,680) $ (2,797,461) $ (379,861) $ (1,003,936) Special Plan Area / Planned Development NE SPA LID SPA SE SPA WD SPA NW SPA Stadium Lands SMV* Existing Development Fees for Water Per Acre Development Fee (Reso 98-22) Acres 215.70 297.00 80.00 24.77 170.00 30.00 95.00 Fee per Acre $ 17,715.00 $ 17,715.00 $ 17,715.00 $ 17,715.00 $ 17,715.00 $ 17,715.00 $ 17,715.00 Subtotal Per Acre Development Fee $ 3,821,126 $ 5,261,355 $ 1,417,200 $ 438,801 $ 3,011,550 $ 531,450 $ 1,682,925 Special Water Connection Fee (Reso 98-24) SFR (units) 920 883 394 0 0 0 0 Fee per Unit $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ 1,715.00 $ 1,715.00 MFR (units) 200 762 81 0 450 0 0 Fee per Unit $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 Nonresidential (acres) 0.00 20.00 7.00 24.77 110.00 0.00 0.00 Fee per Acre $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal Special Water Connection Fee $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - Water/Wastewater Conservation Fee (Reso 98-26) SFR (units) 920 883 394 0 0 0 378 Fee per Unit $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 MFR (units) 200 762 81 0 450 338 275 Fee per Unit $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 Nonresidential (acres) 0.00 20.00 7.00 24.77 110.00 15.70 4.02 Fee per Acre $ 1,625.00 $ 1,625.00 $ 1,625.00 $ 1,625.00 $ 1,625.00 $ 1,625.00 $ 1,625.00 Subtotal Water/Wastewater Conservation Fee $ 364,000 $ 567,125 $ 165,750 $ 40,251 $ 325,000 $ 135,363 $ 218,762 Total Existing Development Fees for Water $ 4,185,126 $ 5,828,480 $ 1,582,950 $ 479,052 $ 3,336,550 $ 666,813 $ 1,901,687 Cost of Required Tank $ 2,240,000 $ 4,994,000 $ 1,997,000 $ - $ 2,270,000 $ - $ 2,840,000 Total Existing Fees +Tank $ 6,425,126 $ 10,822,480 $ 3,579,950 $ 479,052 $ 5,606,550 $ 666,813 $ 4,741,687 Estimate New Capacity Charges for Water (includes tanks) $ 3,836,907 1 $ 7,082,948 1 $ 2,710,650 1 $ 64,372 $ 2,809,089 $ 286,951 $ 3,737,751 Savings (New Charges with Tanks - Existing Fees with Tanks) $ (2,588,219) $ (3,739,532) $ (869,300) $ (414,680) $ (2,797,461) $ (379,861) $ (1,003,936) Proposed Water Capacity ;� Charge November 22, 2016 19 pp-- -Iqq oiiN E RT P4 , P), `Nka. -'-A L I F 0 R N 62 Purpose of the Water Capacity t Charge Updates and replaces the "Per Acre Water Fee" and the "Water & Wastewater Conservation Fee" Includes the full range of water supply and storage facilities that the City needs to build Provides benefits and flexibility for the City and developers (4V,014'NE7" RTP,Rk f72 i=aKN1P A Current Practice All developers pay "Per Acre" and "Water and Wastewater Conservation" fees All large developers are also required to construct water storage tanks No ability to use fee revenue for Sonoma County Water Agency upgrades Limited ability to make tank configurations more efficient or encourage developers to work together Benefits of the Capacity Charge for the City Includes all required water infrastructure Groundwater wells Agency supply improvements Storage tanks Allows City to collect fees and construct facilities in the most efficient manner Calculated by land use rather acre which better reflecting impacts Compliments and can combine with the Public Facilities Fee program Benefits of the Capacity Charge for Developers "Master" developers will pay less Allows for credit at building permit when developer funds or constructs a storage tan I< Provides for flexibility in timing and better coordination Calculated by land use rather than area which is more fair Proposed Capacity Charge Am FA��b MOMMI Development Area =MA Infill (includes Stadium Lands and Wilfred Dowdell) University District SPA Southeast SPA Sonoma Mountain Village PD Northeast SPA Northwest SPA $1,497.38 $760.57 $6.44 $5,469.41 $2,778.10 $23.54 $6,208.71 $3,153.61 $26.72 $6,887.99 $3,498.65 $29.64 $3,755.83 $1,907.71 $16.16 NA $4,536.11 $38.43 Comparative Cost for Master t --j Developers University District SPA Southeast SPA Sonoma Mountain Village PD Northeast SPA Northwest SPA $10,823,000 $7,083,000 $3,740,000 $3,580,000 $2,711,000 $ 869,000 $4,742,000 $3,738,000 $1,004,000 $6,425,000 $3,837,000 $2,588,000 $5,607,000 $2,809,000 $2,798,000 Notification to Property t Owners ,k All property owners and interested parties notified of October 24 workshop and tonight's meeting One -one follow up with active development interests University District Southeast Sonoma Mountain Village Stadium Lands 11NERT ry r+ I C) {72 CALIFOR�IP Questions? �L,JJN r pAR,V .� Mission Statement � sz "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." �AtlF6 AK''P CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November 22, 2016 Department: Administration ITEM NO. I I Submitted By: Darrin Jenkins, City Manager and JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk Prepared By: Carol Adams, Executive Assistant to the City Manager and JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk Agenda Title: Discussion and Direction of a Potential Update of the City Council Protocols (the Established Procedural Rules for the Conduct of City Council Meetings and Council Business) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council to discuss potential amendments to the City Council Protocols (Protocols) and provide direction to amend the Protocols and bring back for adoption by resolution. BACKGROUND: Prior to October 2008, Rohnert Park Municipal Code (RPMC) Chapter 2.08 and various resolutions set forth the procedural rules by which the Council conducted its meetings and city business. The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 807, which removed the procedural provisions from the municipal code and required the establishment of time and place for regular City Council meetings and City Council Protocols be adopted by resolution. At the same meeting the Council adopted, Resolution 2008-173, City Council Protocols ("Protocols") and repealed conflicting and/or redundant resolutions, minute actions, and policies related to the Protocols. Since then, the Protocols were amended by Resolutions 2010-109 and 2015-047. ANALYSIS: The Protocols have been a valuable resource to guide staff on supporting Council in conducting their business. Staff has identified certain provisions that could benefit from updating to provide clearer direction. Potential updates are to sections: • VII. Councilmember Administrative Support o D. Council Notification of Significant Incidents. Staff is requesting the Council review the list in Attachment 1 and modify it as the Council desires. • XI. City Commissions, Committees, and Boards - A. Appointments to City Commissions, Committees, and Boards o A.3. Nominations are made on a rotation basis and the City Clerk shall keep a record of the Councilmembers' rotation order. Staff is seeking establishment of the rotation order. A typical rotation order would be based on seniority. In the event two or more Councilmembers were elected at the same election, seniority would be based on the number of votes received in the election. If seniority based ITEM NO. I I is agreed upon, the established rotation order would be Mackenzie, Stafford, Belforte, Callinan, and Ahanotu. o A.6. "The City Council may establish committees or other taskforces with appointments made "at large" by Council as a whole and may not follow the nomination/appointment rules as outlined in these Protocols. This procedure may be used for committees or taskforces as the City Council deems appropriate." Staff is seeking to clarify the above paragraph. For example: The City Council may establish committees, commissions, boards, or other taskforces with a nomination/appointment process as the Council deems appropriate. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Updating the Protocols is in alignment with Goal C- Ensure the Effective Delivery of Public Services. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: 1. Recommended Option: Direct staff to update the City Council Protocols and bring back for Council consideration. 2. Alternative: Direct staff to not update the City Council Protocols. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: No fiscal impact is expected. Department Head Approval Date: NA Finance Director Approval Date: NA City Attorney Approval Date: NA City Manager Approval Date: 11/16/2016 Attachments (list in packet assembly order): 1. Protocols Section VII. Councilmember Administrative Support — D. Council Notification of Significant Incidents 2. Protocols Section XI. City Commissions, Committees, and Boards 2 the distribution of these communications as required to meet submission deadlines. B. Master Calendar A master calendar of Council events, functions or meetings will be provided to the full Council. Functions, events or meetings to be attended by individual Councilmembers will only be included on the master calendar at the request of individual Councilmembers. C. Requests for Research or Information Councilmembers may request information or research from staff or the City Attorney on a given topic directly when it is anticipated that the request can be completed by staff or the City Attorney in less than an hour. Councilmember requests for research or information that are anticipated to take staff more than one hour to complete should be directed to the City Manager. Requests for legal review that are anticipated to take more than one hour to complete shall be directed to the Council for Consideration during a council meeting. Requests for new information or policy direction will be brought to the full Council at a regular meeting for consideration. D. Council Notification of Significant Incidents To ensure the City Council is aware of significant public safety incidents, the following incidents will be briefed to the City Council by the City Manager or the Director of Public Safety: 1. Major injury or death of a City employee, an employee's immediate family member, or a prisoner in custody by the Department of Public Safety 2. Officer -involved shooting 3. Traffic collision involving a City vehicle resulting in a serious injury requiring hospitalization 4. Hostage or barricaded subject 5. Riot or other major disturbance (e.g., violent protest) 6. City participation in disaster response to other jurisdictions (e.g., strike teams sent to the San Diego fires) 7. Homicide or any unusual event leading to death 8. Major fire resulting in the loss of a structure 9. Assault where the victim may expire 10. Robbery with serious injury 11. Major sex crime with bodily injury 12. Kidnapping 13. A substantial school -related incident 14. Felony arrest of any City employee, or political figure City Council Protocols Amended 311012015 by Reso. No. 2015-047 1343373v1A 80078/0012 Page 20 of 27 15. Any event resulting in substantial media coverage (e.g., discovery of improperly stored bodies by funeral home) 16. Any Public Safety event involving an elected official, City Manager, department head that comes to the attention of the Department of Public Safety 17. Activation of the City's Emergency Operations Center Requirements in existing law (e.g., juvenile information, notification of immediate family members) or the need to protect crime victims may restrict the ability to provide information. This policy is not intended to circumvent legal limits to law enforcement restricted information. In cases where incidents not requiring Council action occur during the hours of 9:00 p.m. through 8:00 a.m., Councilmembers will be contacted the next morning or shortly thereafter. VIII. LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS The Mayor assigns liaisons to various outside agencies, committees, commissions, boards, and taskforces. 1. Unless acting in an official liaison capacity, individual Councilmembers should refrain from attending meetings organized or chaired by City staff which are not open to the public. 2. Liaisons are obligated to keep Council well informed on activities pertaining to Rohnert Park via the Council Committee and Other Reports at Council meetings. 3. City staff may serve as a liaison with the concurrence of the City Manager. IX. OUTSIDE AGENCY APPOINTMENTS The Mayor nominates and the City Council confirms by majority vote of the membership appointments to outside agencies, committees, commissions, boards, and taskforces. 1. An appointee's role is to represent the City on matters affecting the City of Rohnert Park. Appointees have no authority to appropriate City funds except as otherwise approved by the City Council. 2. Appointees are obligated to keep Council well informed via Council meetings or City staff. 3. Appointees are expected to attend meetings on a regular and consistent basis. 4. Each appointees serves at the pleasure of the City Council. Any City Councilmember may bring forward a proposal to remove an appointee. Three affirmative votes of the City Council are required to remove an appointee. City Council Protocols Page 21 of 27 Amended 311012015 by Reso. No, 2015-047 1343373v1A 80078/0012 F. Committee Materials Meeting agendas will be compiled by staff with input from each committee member. Committee materials will be provided to each committee member. These materials will be distributed to each committee member at the same time. Special arrangements may be made with committee members who are out of town when materials are distributed. G. Committee Recommendations Generally, committee members should reach agreement on findings and recommendations to present to the City Council. When the opinions of committee members are divergent, each member may submit his/her findings and recommendations separately to the City Council. Although written minutes of each committee meeting are not required, committee findings and recommendations should be presented to the City Council in a written document. H. Staffing Councilmembers assigned to committees will observe the City Council Protocols regarding staff assignment of duties. Only the City Manager will assign staff to committees for the purposes of administrative services, to attend committee meetings, and to assist with committee presentations to the City Council. XI. CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, AND BOARDS A. Appointments to City Commissions, Committees, and Boards The following procedures will be used in considering appointments by the City Council to the various City commissions, committees, and boards which extend for a term in excess of six (6) months: 1. All persons interested in being considered for service on a City board, commission, or committee must have on file with the City an application (fact -sheet) or request for reappointment indicating an interest in serving. 2. For City commissions, committees, and boards with five (5) members, each Councilmember shall be entitled to appoint one member. All other commissions, committees, and boards in excess of five (5) members shall be selected by the Council as a whole on an "at -large" basis. 3. At -large nominees must receive a majority vote of the City Council membership in order to be appointed. Nominations are made on a rotation basis. The City Clerk shall keep a record of the appointments and the Councilmembers' rotation order. The rotation order shall stay intact for future appointments unless amended or rescinded. 4. Whenever an appointed member of a commission, committee, or board vacates a term of office, the Councilmember who nominated said person, or the Councilmember's successor in office, shall be entitled to make the appointment to complete the term of office. City Council Protocols Page 23 of 27 Amended 3/10/2015 by Reso. No. 2015-047 1343373v1A 80078/0012 5. Whenever a vacancy occurs on a City commission, committee, or board, the City Clerk shall post a notice of the vacancy notifying the public of the vacancy to be filled and the date that applications will be considered to fill the vacancy in compliance with the Maddy Act. 6. The City Council may establish committees or other taskforces with appointments made "at large" by Council as a whole and may not follow the nomination/appointment rules as outlined in these Protocols. This procedure may be used for committees or taskforces as the City Council deems appropriate. B. Policy for Service on City Commissions, Committees, and Boards 1. Attendance Members of commissions, committees, and boards are expected to attend meetings on a regular and consistent basis. An automatic vacancy shall occur on a commission, committee, or board if a member is absent from three (3) consecutive regular meetings without cause. Cause means "illness or other unavoidable circumstance of which the chair of the board, commission or committee is notified prior to the meeting." The chair of the commission or committee shall notify the City Manager promptly of all absences that are excused for cause. 2. Removal Each member of a board, commission, or committee created and appointed by the City Council serves at the pleasure of the City Council. Any Councilmember may bring forward a proposal to remove a board, commission, or committee member. Three (3) affirmative votes of the City Council are required to remove a member of a board, commission, or committee. 3. Role Most commissions, committees, and boards established by the City Council are advisory to the City Council. The role of all such commission, committee, or board is to make recommendations to the City Council on matters affecting the City of Rohnert Park. Except as otherwise provided in state or local law, commissions and committees have no independent role separate and apart from their role as advisory to the City Council. Commissions, committees, and boards have no authority to appropriate funds or make policy except as otherwise approved by the City Council. 4. Conflict of Interest All members of commissions, committees, and boards shall abide by the provisions of the Political Reform Act of the State of California and provisions of the common law relating to conflicts of interest. City Council Protocols Page 24 of 27 Amended 3/10/2015 by Reso. No. 2015-047 1343373v1A 80078/0012 y -O NE RT 1'q RK Mission Statement "' r' "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November 22, 2016 Department: Administration Submitted By: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk Prepared By: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk ITEM NO. 12A Agenda Title: Acceptance of Report of Appointments to City Commissions, Committees, and Boards for terms expiring December 31, 2018 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Acceptance of Report of Appointments to City Commissions, Committees, and Boards for terms expiring December 31, 2018. BACKGROUND: In compliance with the Maddy Act (Gov't Code § 54970, et seq.) a 2016 Local Appointments List containing required advisory body appointive information was posted and distributed in December 2015. On October 5, 2016, the Committee, Commission, and Board members were advised of their expiring term. In order to attract potential applicants, the City Clerk's office issued a press release on October 14, 2016. ANALYSIS: Per the City Council Protocols (Protocols) for City Commissions, Committees, and Boards with five (5) members, each Councilmember shall be entitled to appoint one member. The Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Councilmembers have made their appointments which are reported below. REPORT OF APPOINTMENTS The following is a list indicating the member who is requesting reappointment, those seeking appointment, and the name of the appointing Councilmember: BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Five Two-year Terms ITEM NO. 12 A Necessary qualifications: Current Rohnert Park residents are eligible. Preference is given to interested and responsible bicycle enthusiasts to review and make recommendations to the City Council on Bike Path Plans/Projects in the community. Meets on the 4th Monday @ 5:30 p.m. - City Hall Conference Room 2A PURPOSE: Review Bike Path Plans/Projects & make recommendations to City Council. (Established 9/22/92 by City Council concurrence; Amended 9/22/15 by Resolution 2015-154; (Policy Resolutions 2000-117; 2000-232; 2005-43; 2015-047) APPOINTEE I FIRST APPOINTED Terry Gault 11/2009 Katherine Musick 1 2/2015 Stephen Gold 1 1/2015 Tim Hensel 1 1/2011 Gary Gutierrez I NA MOBILE HOME PARKS RENT APPEALS BOARD Five Two-year Terms - Staggered ACTION Reappointment Reappointment Reappointment APPOINTED BY Gina Belforte Jake Mackenzie Pam Stafford Reappointment I Joseph T. Callinan Appointment I Amy O. Ahanotu Necessary qualifications: Current Rohnert Park residents who are duly qualified registered voters are eligible. Board Members will be required to file conflict of interest statements as required by law. Preference is given to citizens interested in preventing unreasonable rent increases for controlled mobile home rental spaces in Rohnert Park for the five (5) mobile home parks in the city while still assuring the owner's right to a fair return. Meets on the 1st Thursday @ 6:00 p.m. - Council Chamber PURPOSE: Administration of Mobile Home Park Ordinance No. 494 (Chapter 9.70 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code), established to regulate rent adjustments for the five (5) mobile home parks in the city. (Established by Initiative Election 12/8/87 by Ord. No. 494; Amended 1/24/95 by Ord. No. 599; 7/11/95 by Ord. No. 607; 1/23/96 by Ord. No. 612; and 8/22/00 by Ord. No. 658; subject to Policy Resolutions 2000-117; 2000-232; 2005-43; 2015-047) APPOINTEE I FIRST APPOINTED I ACTION I APPOINTED BY Kurt Engelhart 17/1995 I Reappointment I Jake Mackenzie Sarah M. Finnigan 18/2015 1 Reappointment I Pam Stafford ITEM NO. 12A PARKS & RECREATION Necessary qualifications: Current Rohnert Park residents COMMISSION are eligible. Preference is given to citizens indicating an Five Two-year Terms interest in parks and recreation programs for the community. Meets on the 3rd Thursday @ 6:00 p.m. - Council Chamber PURPOSE: Review policies & programs & make recommendations to Council & Recreation Department. (Established 11/19/62 by Ord. No. 12; Amended 7/17/72 by Ord. No. 180; Amended 9/26/83 by Ord. No. 423; Amended 7/21/86 by Ord. No. 466; Amended on 4/26/89 by Ord. No. 512; Amended 2/11/93 by Ord. No. 572; Amended 1/28/03 by Ord. No. 694; Amended 1/23/07 by Ord. No. 778; Amended 4/26/16 by Ord. No. 898; subject to Policy Resolutions 2000-117; 2000-232; 2005-43; 2007-16; 2008-069; 2015-047) APPOINTEE FIRST APPOINTED ACTION APPOINTED BY Chris Borr 1/2009 Reappointment Gina Belforte Gerald Griffin 1/1993 Reappointment Jake Mackenzie Linda Canterbury 6/2015 Reappointment Pam Stafford Michael Bird 1/2003 Reappointment Joseph T. Callinan Bonnie L. Black 1/2005 Reappointment Amy O. Ahanotu SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMISSION Five Two-year Terms Necessary qualifications: Current Rohnert Park residents, who are 60 years old or older, are eligible. Preference is given to citizens indicating an interest in identifying the needs of the elderly of the community and creating citizen awareness of these needs. Meets on the 3rd Thursday of January, May, & September at 1:00 p.m. - Senior Center PURPOSE: To advise Council and City Manager on policies & programs serving Rohnert Park's Senior Citizens. (Established 11/24/80 by Resolution No. 80-214; subject to Policy Resolutions 2000-117; 2000-232; 2005-43; 2015-047) APPOINTEE FIRST APPOINTED ACTION APPOINTED BY Lorreen Abbott 3/2016 Reappointment Gina Belforte Caryl Sherman NA Appointment Jake Mackenzie Elaine Sampson 1/2005 Reappointment Pam Stafford Cheryl Burton 4/2015 Reappointment Joseph T. Callinan Nancy Garvey 2/2015 Reappointment Amy O. Ahanotu ITEM NO. 12A STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Making appointments to City Committees, Commissions, and Boards supports the City's values of communication and collaboration and Goal D — Continue to Develop a Vibrant Community. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: 1. Recommended Option: City Council to receive the Report of Appointments. 2. Alternative: City Council could consider the item at a future City Council meeting however this option is not recommended because current terms expire 12/31/2016 which could result in a lack of quorum for most bodies. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: None. Department Head Approval Date: NA City Manager Approval Date: 11/17/2016 Finance Director Approval Date: NA City Attorney Approval Date: NA Attachments (list in packet assembly order): 1. Completed Reappointment/Fact Sheet and Fact Sheet Application Forms 2. City Council Protocols Section XI, City Commissions, Committees, and Boards City of Rohnert Park Request for Reappointment 2017 ROHNERT PARK OCT 1.12016 CITY CLERK Name of Commission/Committee/Board Bicycle Advisory Comittee Full Name Terry Gault Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) Home Phone ( ) Cell Phone ( ) Email Employer The Henderson Group Employed Since 1997 Job Title/Position Managing Partner Work Phone Big Brothers Big Sisters - Mentor Bay Area Consultants Network - Vice -Chair and Board Member Please list community groups or organizations your are affiliated with and list any offices lie Id. Have served on BAC since 2009 Additional Comments Terry_ Gault Name (Printed) Signature October 9, 2016 Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www,rpcity.org City of Roh nert Park Request for Reappointment 2 C' -7 NaMe Of COMMISSIWC*M lnec/Boald bicycle, e. Pci do5llrmn Advr rye :-',-vnrwrtee Full Nime Kzw,,aflno t�Xatio) Mx,,xk Rosidanco Address (Physic.il Address, not PO) H*rVic Phone L fri'd i I Unploycr c! In V1. 1!*. Vv )ob title/Posillon PIcase list community groups or organizations you are affiliated with and I ist any offices held. Additional Comments W" 1printodl W1 Phonc Ernpfoyrd Since Work Phone Solic'm'D stmt� sn'nata I have remix ZI c� T t j C:;R a -. 1 tj. Pedestrian Advisory Committee- and I look :rd tD Vpatkj rt ROHNERT PARK OCT 112016 CITY CLERK a -g-l(c Date 1WXvMM Merv* - fthr%ert Oark Ch1, O -Mn a (7071 $09-2,1627 * rio(In MV49 R -HNERT PARC 4U, °" •, City of Rohnert Park 2016 Fact Sheet for Appointments to Commissions, SEP 9 X016 Committees and Boards CITY CLERK dF`� Which Commission, Board, or Committee do you seek Appointment? bl w CIS. - e-" Ted xs+nlrte- AjV �o3 V^'e-_ Residence Telephone Name Address Work Phone i*a —{ )- --- - Cell 1 ( } — -- Email Indicate . Reasons for your Interest in Appointment I Joist of die F,PP� art 7"vt to t S , Sa�+� pnw`° G�4.cP,✓►A • Z rt d� G+tJ s Srlre¢ Ov.of pAS r-es��nlo, j4 / �ke�'� ow, ej�. s-�s-P'>'` qq h azawa� s aha c rr (v�-PW+1 0(1 rs SW -,j , T'vJ bew'- +0 cor+i 4yt� V4-c- ih ri.A�y wot 3 kW-1-1AA3 GIiW1YiY�i ��C �ti �. Z .t_ cra g tN �`lK List Activities in Clubs, Associations, etc. Rolkr\ei* rte% — sil-U- 20[4 b 5i�e_ Ed.-d,� •c;� C,o i JAS 5t-Dr'%vw( S'o - sir,et 2d U1 'P c� J,h 9lpe c+ r i) a,e j, -S o M o -F Are you Over 18? Yes No Are you Registered to Vote in Rohnert Park? 67-- 9 No What Year did you Become a Rohnert Park Resident? 2,0 1 Employer j"�,-C, � r-'. et Address Type of Business Specific Work Performed High School Diploma (Y' No Other Degrees, Awards, etc. JFR Oket d1r t• S u PM c� i.Uvv.v Vel' Gtv� Ai SlA 3 � ��1^ � 1B44� o� j A^ Signature Date: PLEASE RETURN TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE a)2a(Z0c(o 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 792-1876 www.rpcity.org Foran Approved by City Council 1/7/03 m:\commission-conunittee-board appointments\2015-2016 annual appointments fornts\2016 fact sheet.docx ROHNERT PARK City of Rohnert Park 2017 OCT 26 2016 r;Request for Reappointment CITY CLERK 'aeiFartia Name of Commission/Committee/Board ] } C -r6 -/Z Ahb ` � q>iz� STP - j tl V A >V} -soo- cii M I Full Name --T-� M 14 a N L Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) Home Phone ( ) Cell Phone Email Employer 5 0 n 0 ✓ice Sr ,4"I'� &'i Employed Since ) �� 3 Job Title/Position }NS7--,et�C`�i[�h � S;r'hQ� Work Phone (dol) 6&LL ,4L455- tiP+jv, ,�-- L b05 a -g (4� e--\,%C-,t, -j f -t lA Q. N R r -HA L r ✓1 e GL I l -FU � n i� Please list community groups kyr,- 4klp_ 5 ✓j Ca I i -4�C r n , - or organizations you are YV)`y„nbe-(- dT -*V\p -t>'l V! "I C-c-�-ri G affiliated with and list any fl'i Ke- r'?Zk L4. offices held. it C ono r 6 iQ iJ�,- w r r Upb Ir�r.n a N. Cc�l ® M e.rn h e. e D Sp V! 0 m v" Co vn �� %j i L.+� C �'Q. coC- Additional Comments"` 6k 0 P'?v\ r Name (Printed) Signature Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 W W W.rpcity.org 0 •, City of Rohnert Park Fact Sheet for Appointments to Commissions, Committees and Boards Which Commission, Board, or Committee do you seek Appointment? Name Gary Gutierrez Residence Telephone Address Work Phone Fax ( ) Cell Email Indicate Reasons for your Interest in Appointment 12016 ROHNIERT PAR iO,CT 2 6 2016 CITY CLERK I am interested in participating on the Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee because biking and walking are important to my family's quality of life and contributes to the personal health and well-being of our community. I am committed to help build a thriving Rohnert Park that includes safe and convenient transportation systems for bicyclists and pedestrians. As a bike commuter, I want to improve bicycle safety, improve air quality, and reduce green house gas emissions. I am interested in the "Aging Together" initiative to promote a community that ages together by supporting self-care, physical fitness, and good mental health across our lifespans. List Activities in Clubs, Associations, etc. *Service Employees International Union Local 1021- Bargaining Team Member and Worksite Steward *United Way of Sonoma County- Schools of Hope Classroom Tutor at Thomas Page Elementary school *Sonoma County Community Development Commission -Homeless Census & Data Survey Volunteer *County of Sonoma- Day of Caring volunteer annually for various community service projects *PTA- Treasurer- Evergreen Elementary School Are you Over 18? Q No Are you Registered to Vote in Rohnert Park? ' Yes No What Year did you Become a Rohnert Park Resident? Employer County of Sonoma Address 2227 Capricorn Way, Suite 100, Santa Rosa 95407 Type of Business County Government Specific Work Performed Supervising Employment & Training Counselor High School Diploma Yes No Other Degrees, Awards, etc. B.A. Degree -Sociology and Criminal Justice from Sonoma State University M.A. Degree -Counseling from Saint Mary's College Signature Date: October 23, 2016 PLEASE RETURN TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 792-1876 www.rpcity.org Fonn Approved by City Council 1/7/03 m kommission-committee-board appointments\2015-2016 annual appointments Forms\2016 fact sheet docx 2016-10-10 12:23 YVHEWIS 7079444950 >> P 1/1 City of Rohnert Park 2017 ° Request for Reappointment �sai•nua" Name of Commission/Committee/Board i Mobile Home Parks Rent Appeals Board Full Name� L Kurt Cngelhart Residence !Address (Physical A�dress, nvt r'�).. . Fiume Phone Frnall Employer I Retired L.Jo i itl.e Position Volunteer Plea.Se list Corrantinity groups or organizations you are affiliate(] with and lis[. any offices held. Additional <_omments L Kurt Engelhart Name (Printed) C( -.Al Phone. ROH141=RT PAP -K OCT 112016 CITY CLERK Employed Since j -1991 I Work Phone Rant Hoard, Kohnert Park Yountville Veterans Home, Yountville I I j Goals in the Mobile Horne Parks Rent Appeals Board - Keeping in touch with mobile home and trailer park law. Helping insure a healthy relationship between owners and residents. Administering City law to the best of my ability. Note- I have no postal delivery to 7450 Cristobal Way_ My mailing address is PO Box 195, Yountville, CA 94599. Sign, stu _ 10 OCT 2016 Date 730 Avr im Avenue . Rolmert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588 2227 • I'ax ('/0/) 194 y248 www-rucltv.oi 8, ROHNF!"`T ;'ARK City of Rohnert Park 2017 NOV 01 2016 g Request for Reappointment CITY CLERK C+ro"pv► Name of Commissian/Committee/Board Mobile Home Parks Resit Appeal .Board Full Name Sarah Mercedes Finnigan Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) Home Phone Gell Phone Email - - Employer Eden I&R, Inc. Fniployed Since 01/19/16 w_.w. Job Title/Position Deputy Director Work Phone American Red Cross, Volunteer American University of Paris, President's Alumni Advisory Council, Memb Please list community groups Alameda County Emergency Managers Association, Treasurer or organizations you are affiliated with and list any offices held. Thank you for considering my candidacy for reappointment. Additional Comments Sarah M. Finnigan October 31, 2016 Name (Printed) Signature Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpcltv.oret ROHNEI-Z"T r?AkK `A16City of Rohnert Park 2017 L4Request for Reappointment OCT 31 Nis ..:,. CITY CLERK Name of Commission/Committee/Board r -{r,46 --i — Fun Name Gr'/11^i S fip,�l��r Auto Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) Homy Phone Cell Phone Entail — -- - -- - — Employer fo"M+rV Y G Employed Since Job Title/Position Sr -P�� rAVI, Work Phone Please fist community groups l �V or organizations you are �r✓(��? ��! 1r�eG lily Ue> affiliated with and list any offices held, Additional. Comments Vl VI V f AV-. Name (Printed) Aignature Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpcity.org ROHNERT PARK City of Rohnert Park 2017 OCT 112016 Request for Reappointment CITY CLERK Name of Corn mission/Corn mittee/Boa rd V lw" S At-jQ Full Name Ger -A' 'n BP,4 GitFF i N Residence Address (Physical Address, not PCI) Home Phone Cell Phone Email Employer Job Title/Position 12ECn-t:PrTl��/ COM.MI SS�oNJ .............. Employed Since Work Phone ( ) � 14-kde- SC 62 U69 v, nt97 �Ao(AS PAO J Please list community groups 1 `� (t-o-qorJ U dL% 2 3 yE' tt or organizations you are ) j*w , te-ZOv I /V 149 WLrj /.J1J /i' 4wy affiliated with and list any offices held. V 6 l t e 5 L/, -r7-"-" L �ik&P AAs env 1 Poi pa G3 oe; or T-0,0 aMCAJ-10,) t"O' c4, 0f-TaO6, TO �� Sys A ro.j . jr Cp�� l,�rtp T -Z) C©n1,r7w14 /Afe TD Additional Comments I L /' JEW_ G(kr-4�d loll i Name (Printed) Signature Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpcity.org City of Rohnert Park Request for Reappointment 201JROHNERT PARK OCT 24 2016, CITY CLERK Name of Commission/Committee/Board -Park z) and �Qcpf I-�'Oy Full Name Linda Canterbury Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) Home Phone Email I Employer Traditional Medicinals (Tea Mfg) Job Title/Position Accounts Payable Please list community groups or organizations you are affiliated with and list any offices held. Cell Phone Please see application ubmitted 2015 Employed Since July 2012 Work Phone Mame (Printed) Signature- Date /e-6'14 �rITARN�1 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) wNw.rpGtv.ora 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 City of Rohnert Park Request for Reappointment OCA %a SIB CITY CLERK Name of Commission/Committee/Board P Af;7, r, a ` R Full Name 1,' I Cy A E £ S• Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) Home Phone Cep Phone Email Employer K-L7l Eb t)F-0T-tS-NEmployed Since �iGF _....... ... -.._....._.. Joh Title/Position Work _Phone ( ) �� (Z,�. �lR� S aF rB ��L — r✓3oFlRJ G'� ES ��bAcN Please list Community groups CSF CUplft1 CR U or organizations you are affiliated with and list any offices 'held. � iVb L.UnI�� Aci�vE )� �i��i;R ariVE Additional Comments Name (Printed) Signature Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpdtv.ore City of Rohnert Park �.yll»jej ..�p� Request for Reappointment SAI IF.F.1F Name of Commission/Committee/Board A?"k Full Name Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) Home Phone Cel) Phone Email Employer/ ROHNERT PARK 2017 OCT 312918 CITY CLERK ................ _................. Employed Since - Joh Title/Position - Work Phone ( ) Please list community groups or organizations you are affiliated with and list any offices held. Additional Comments a /Vrlit0L, Z l -NMMMM4 44& - Name (Printed) Signature Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rncity.ors City of Rohnert Park Request for Reappointment 2017-2018 Park and Recreation Commission Bonnie L. Black INDICATE REASONS FOR YOUR INTEREST APPOINTMENT I believe the outstanding network of parks and recreational services to be this city's greatest asset and basic identity. I am interested in returning to the Commission to offer my experience to help protect and develop these services. After years of stagnation in park development and just hoping to preserve the parks and amenities we have under severe budget restraints, Rohnert Park is now seeing new development and starting to address the deferred maintenance. The possibilities of finally creating a `down town' with public space amenities is on the municipal radar screen and offers some great potential. I would like to be a part of the team that insures that these new developments include the best possible parks and recreational opportunities for Rohnert Park. I've been honored to serve on the Park and Recreation Commission for most of a decade with some outstanding other commissioners. Although we represent different ideas, we have worked together well these past few years. I believe that with strong staff leadersh ip, and better communication with the Planning. Commission and the City Council, we can be even more effective in the future. LIST ACTIVITIES IN CLUBS, ASSOCIATIONS, ETC. RP Parks and Recreation Commission 2004-2016 (with 2 year break), PROS Committee, Founder and Community Liaison of Best Friends Canine Club 1999 -present, BOD of Rohnert Park Swim Club 1988-1998, several RP P'T'As 1985-2000, ED of The Education I oundation of Cotati-Rohnert Park 1994-2005 and currently on Advisory Board, Accordion Festival Committee 1995-2004, volunteer for the RP Animal Shelter, Sewer Fund Stakeholders Committee, "Adopter'(for B.FCC) of Golis Park through the RP Adopt a Park program and 4Paws Healing and Wellness Center (volunteer canine therapy team that visits hospitals and the RP Library and disasters offering comfort, encouragement and emotional mrpport)_ OTHER DEGRESS, AWARDS, ETC. BA Degree, teaching credential, Certificate in Canine Behavior and Training, CPRS District 2006 Community Service Award "for outstanding service and support to the RP Rec. Dept.", Sonoma County JX Wilson Award 2002, US Congressional Recognition 2002 Cm recognition of outstanding and invaluable service to the community — JX Wilson Award') ROHNEn'r PARK City of Rohnert Park 2017 Request for Reappointment OCT 0 2016 CITY CLERK Name of Commission/Committee/Board Full Name,©Y' rel 1 LoI�_l 1(7. TL►�,JO Residence Address (Physical Address, not PC) - - — - _- Home Phone Cell Phone ( ) Email Employer 0—t t Y'C Employed Since Joh Title/Positlon -- work Phone 3®hd Please kilt community groups CR PSI) 0 a -%-%he w Co vh N. or organizations you are affiliated with and list any offices held, I -- C- t nF r�o ti; � � �-� ��. � � , Pa�,r � cw► TecLoJ-i - lov'a.l Additional Comments Name (Printed) Signature Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpcity.org City of Rohnert Park I Z0j%W PARK Fact Sheet for Appointments to Commissions, NOV 02 2016 Committees and Boards CITY CLERK Which Commission, Board, or Committee do you seek Appointment? .. .... ... ...... ... I . ..... Name 11 ) ResirJence Telephone . . . ....... Address Work Phone Fax Cell ............ Email Indicate Reasons for your Inter( ht in Appointment Lt� V -- :,V5L Activities in Clubs, Associations, etc, 2�Ali 4� Are you Over 18? YesiJ No .. . . . . ... . ........... . . ...... Are you Registered to Vote in Rohnert Park? Yes No TA&VL,ov What Year did you Become a Rohncrt Park Resident? Employer Address Type of Business Specific Work Performed High School Diploma Yes No 5 Other Degrees, Awards, etc. A j-t:-Zo " A— \-7 . ....... ....... ... . ................. Signature Date: 4 (0 4 PLEASE RETURN TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 130 Avram Avenue - Rohnert Park CA - 94928 - (707) 588-2227 - Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpcity.org Forni Approved by City Council 1/7/03 m:\coininission-committee-board appointinents\2017-2018 annual appointment fonns\2017 fact sheet.doex RoHNERT ppRK City of Rohnert Park 2017 pC� 25 2016 '•` Request for Reappointment f 1 CIV CLERIrC Name of Commission/Committee/Board c; /'J .4 y t ,r2,:Nj Full Name ,¢ i IV.E 5,Q /,7 r 5; �' r Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) Home Phone Cell Phone ( ) Email Employer 6- Employed Since Job Title/Position Work Phone ( ) /dG� r✓ t rrc s w/J'!/h r�TF« Please list community groups r� /V or organizations you are 2 r2-� s P �w i7 affiliated with and list any _ `� 5 offices held. S61 T 4 /L �" / /� �'� P �= /✓a CUs Additional Comments ��'� .T I N� 5 /�/,A2T ./R,� , ,✓, c�TG r�r'i✓�� R s .Ls C o /%�/ T L ��' G K C~C P l/ P Nc X tN +wC �K�� t�S /f' 6 o f 7-0 5 r T Name (Printed) Signature Dat 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rocity.ore City of Rohnert Park 201 OHNERT PARK >> Request for Reappointment OCT 28 X016 CITy CLERK Name of CoJrrmiision/Committ Board ) ; �>er�cr��;;�o, t vmr�•xS+� Full Name I C (� �r --VaDo Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) Home Phone Cell Phone ( ) Email Employer - Employed Since Job Title/Position Work Phone ( ) Please list community groups or organizations you are affiliated with and list any offices held. I I r Additional Comments1��-v,�x.mvnw eA C Ob Name ( i ted) IM 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpcity.org IG ROHNEKI' PARK City of Rohnert Park 2017 OCT 20 2016 Request for Reappointment CITY CLERK Narne of Comm ission/Com mitt e/Board +.�rz�ws 40 (119 PVJ Full Name Residence Address - (Physical Address, not PO) Home Phone Cell Phone Email - Employer Employed Since Job Title/Position l /�-- Work Phone ( ) Please list community groups or organizations you are affiliated with and list any offices meld. Additional Comments /� 7 Nam (Printed) Signature iJ A /2 - Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpcltV.org F. Committee Materials Meeting agendas will be compiled by staff with input from each committee member. Committee materials will be provided to each committee member. These materials will be distributed to each committee member at the same time. Special arrangements may be made with committee members who are out of town when materials are distributed. G. Committee Recommendations Generally, committee members should reach agreement on findings and recommendations to present to the City Council. When the opinions of committee members are divergent, each member may submit his/her findings and recommendations separately to the City Council. Although written minutes of each committee meeting are not required, committee findings and recommendations should be presented to the City Council in a written document. H. Staffing Councilmembers assigned to committees will observe the City Council Protocols regarding staff assignment of duties. Only the City Manager will assign staff to committees for the purposes of administrative services, to attend committee meetings, and to assist with committee presentations to the City Council. XI. CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, AND BOARDS A. Appointments to City Commissions, Committees, and Boards The following procedures will be used in considering appointments by the City Council to the various City commissions, committees, and boards which extend for a term in excess of six (6) months: 1. All persons interested in being considered for service on a City board, commission, or committee must have on file with the City an application (fact -sheet) or request for reappointment indicating an interest in serving. 2. For City commissions, committees, and boards with five (5) members, each Councilmember shall be entitled to appoint one member. All other commissions, committees, and boards in excess of five (5) members shall be selected by the Council as a whole on an "at -large" basis. 3. At -large nominees must receive a majority vote of the City Council membership in order to be appointed. Nominations are made on a rotation basis. The City Clerk shall keep a record of the appointments and the Councilmembers' rotation order. The rotation order shall stay intact for future appointments unless amended or rescinded. 4. Whenever an appointed member of a commission, committee, or board vacates a term of office, the Councilmember who nominated said person, or the Councilmember's successor in office, shall be entitled to make the appointment to complete the term of office. City Council Protocols Page 23 of 27 Amended 3/10/2015 by Reso. No. 2015-047 1343373v1A 80078/0012 5. Whenever a vacancy occurs on a City commission, committee, or board, the City Clerk shall post a notice of the vacancy notifying the public of the vacancy to be filled and the date that applications will be considered to fill the vacancy in compliance with the Maddy Act. 6. The City Council may establish committees or other taskforces with appointments made "at large" by Council as a whole and may not follow the nomination/appointment rules as outlined in these Protocols. This procedure may be used for committees or taskforces as the City Council deems appropriate. B. Policy for Service on City Commissions, Committees, and Boards 1. Attendance Members of commissions, committees, and boards are expected to attend meetings on a regular and consistent basis. An automatic vacancy shall occur on a commission, committee, or board if a member is absent from three (3) consecutive regular meetings without cause. Cause means "illness or other unavoidable circumstance of which the chair of the board, commission or committee is notified prior to the meeting." The chair of the commission or committee shall notify the City Manager promptly of all absences that are excused for cause. 2. Removal Each member of a board, commission, or committee created and appointed by the City Council serves at the pleasure of the City Council. Any Councilmember may bring forward a proposal to remove a board, commission, or committee member. Three (3) affirmative votes of the City Council are required to remove a member of a board, commission, or committee. 3. Role Most commissions, committees, and boards established by the City Council are advisory to the City Council. The role of all such commission, committee, or board is to make recommendations to the City Council on matters affecting the City of Rohnert Park. Except as otherwise provided in state or local law, commissions and committees have no independent role separate and apart from their role as advisory to the City Council. Commissions, committees, and boards have no authority to appropriate funds or make policy except as otherwise approved by the City Council. 4. Conflict of Interest All members of commissions, committees, and boards shall abide by the provisions of the Political Reform Act of the State of California and provisions of the common law relating to conflicts of interest. City Council Protocols Page 24 of 27 Amended 3/10/2015 by Reso. No. 2015-047 1343373v1A 80078/0012 Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November 22, 2016 Department: Administration Submitted By: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk Prepared By: JoAnne Buergler, City Clerk ITEM NO. 12B Agenda Title: City Council Appointments to the Planning Commission — Terms Expiring December 31, 2018 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Appoint City Councilmembers' Nominations to the Rohnert Park Planning Commission for Terms Expiring December 31, 2018. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission is charged with development of the General Plan, implementation and administration of the Zoning Ordinance, and review of development applications. Planning Commission members shall reside in Rohnert Park and will serve for a 2 -year term (or remainder thereof). Commissioners are required to file conflict of interest statements consistent with state law. Applicants are expected to be residents interested in acting as an advisory agency to the City Council and in having such powers and duties as may be assigned to it by the City Council, including that of Board of Appeals to hear appeals of Zoning Administrator decisions. There are five members of the Planning Commission with terms expiring December 31, 2016. On October 5, 2016, the five Commissioners were advised of their expiring term. In order to attract potential applicants, the City Clerk's office issued a press release on October 14, 2016. All five Commissioners are seeking reappointment. No additional fact sheet applications were received. ANALYSIS: Rohnert Park Municipal Code 17.25.091 states each Councilmember may nominate one resident for appointment by the City Council. The following is a list indicating the Commissioners who are requesting reappointment and the name of the nominating Councilmember: Nominee Action Nominated by Gerard Giudice Reappointment Mayor Belforte Susan Haydon Reappointment Vice Mayor Mackenzie Daniel A. Blanquie Reappointment Councilmember Stafford ITEM NO. 12B John E. Borba Reappointment Councilmember Callinan Susan Adams Reappointment Councilmember Ahanotu Nominees for Planning Commission must be appointed by the City Council per Municipal Code. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Making appointments to the Planning Commission supports the City's values of communication and collaboration and Goal D — Continue to Develop a Vibrant Community. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: 1. Recommended Option: City Council appoint the Councilmembers' nominees to the Planning Commission for two-year terms expiring 12/31/2018. 2. Alternative: City Council could consider the item at a future City Council meeting however this option is not recommended because current terms expire 12/31/2016 which could result in a Planning Commission lack of quorum. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: None. Department Head Approval Date: NA City Manager Approval Date: 11/16/2016 Finance Director Approval Date: NA City Attorney Approval Date: NA Attachments (list in packet assembly order): 1. Completed Reappointment/Fact Sheet Forms 2. Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 17.25.091 City of Rohnert Park 2017 Request for Reappointment {+eiru.w5". Name of commission/Committee/Board y,1 I Full Name (,y--c-<� � Iv � k� 0 - Residence Address (Physical Address, not Pd) Home Phone Cell Phone Email Employer { + Ori .wnAI�A Employed Since ROHNERT PARK OCT 14,20% CITY CLERK Job Title/Position vc�`Cl- Work Phone ` c"k(' Ca�R ►l CICU 6 Please list community groups 2,,` or organizations you are YAMV � �A� t t � TP�- �&S k affiliated with and list any offices held. T\WV\ r IS ( S -�"Vv w ` stns -,-j Additional Comments 0\,W� qju�tck )a a (Printed) ' tb►2-II b Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.racitv.ora °I .' i City of Rohnert Park 201A0H RK NE.`°y i �...��, ° Request for Reappointment OCT 24 2016 CITY CLERK Name of Commission/Committee/Board' Full Name I5115f�N p�f>'9�f iJot.� Residence Address (Physical Address, not P01 Home Phone Cell Phone Email Employer1rWrrv��C jn�ci,_..r� Employed Since ?( Job Title/Position Work Phone Please list community groups �'�Y ��'�� Er(�GI►��`' �''"'�" fi'a `�� ¢ ��"� �'��' or organizations you are affiliated with and list any offices held. �-I f}+a�t Yle-Ts' 6#V.W ; ��"f,I�D � ��•+�►.+�Y � 1ck{.-+ �d...?•C+� /(�_ �]�' i Additional Comments i I � i Name (Printed) ASignaureMM Da e 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www. rpdty.ork From: 10/1812016 99:58 9202 P.001/001 ROHNERT PARK City of Rohnert Park 2017 OCT 19 2016 Request for Reappointment •ar.arMa CITY CLERK Commission Daniel DB Claims Services Group, Inc. 14!E,_ 2/2003 .M , President ar h y I served several years on the Executive Board of the Rohnert Park Baseball League. I was also a Rotarian. On a city level, I currently serve on the Planning Commission and my current appointment began in 8/2013.1 was previously on the Planning Commission (2002-2004). I also chaired the Rohnert Park Parks and Recreation Open Space Committee (2005-2008.) On a state level, I was elected and served as President of the California Association of Independent Insurance Adjusters (1997-1998.) I served on the Cotati-Rohnert Park Education Foundation Board, just retiring in 7/2016. I was on their Executive Board for several years, to include being President in 2007-2008. ?A a '� �"l Name (Printed) Signature Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 7949248 www.radmora "'"" City of Rohnert Park 2017 ROHNE, ?Iak��C Request for Reappointment OCT 24 2016 �urexw+" CITY CLERK Name of Commission/Committee/Board Full Nameoh Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) i Morrie P1 one Cell Phone Email Employer Z +z -�'[.'P..srn 34 - Employed Since lob Title/position, = Work Phone _3%, � ' �',)-r--`Lkrv'.;.r f��'�vrk..�-'�� J`'r.�•w+b C�'��rc. i Please list community groups t t3cc�r�l I or organizations you arent'_-r affiliated with and list any 5` rylf'v_t3 offices held. co COP— os- ' c� P ' �.t s�+ mac, y c� Additional Comments fe A --z S6 -v,•1– '{>\ krv,",� S „"O +1 I I Name (Printed) Si n Lire Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rocitY.ork lv'otkoieva PARK City of Rohnert Park 2417 Request for Reappointment C "srnaM•,^ Name of Commission/Committee/Board Planning Commission Full Name Susan Adams Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) 1-lonle Phone ( ) Cell Phone ( ) Email Employer Art Hollingsworth Insurance Employed Since 1997 Job Title/Position Director of Operations Work Phone ( ) - ,+ LJMS PTSA RP Committee to review Water/sewer rates Please list community groups Community School Advisory Committee or organizations you are Co-chair, Yes on Measure D (parcel tax) affiliated with and list any Chair, Yes on Measure B ( school bond) offices held, Chair, Parcel Tax Renewal Committee Member, Yes on Measure C Member, Rohnert Park, Chamber of Commerce ANA- J 7.j . Additional Comments Susan H. Adams Name (Printed) Thank you for considering my application. Rignature 10/24/1.6 Date 130 Avram Avenue • Rohnert Park CA • 94928 • (707) 588-2227 • Fax (707) 794-9248 WWW.rpdLt-orX Rohnert Park, CA Code of Ordinances Page 1 of 2 Article IX. - Planning Commission 17.25.090 - Planning commission created. Subject to the provisions of this section, there is created a planning commission for the city consisting of five members. (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.25.091 -Planning commission appointments—Term of office—Compensation—Vacancies. A. Members of the planning commission shall be appointed by the city council. Each councilperson may nominate one resident of the city of Rohnert Park for appointment to the planning commission. The term of each commission member shall be for two years expiring on December thirty first. B. Each member shall serve at the pleasure of the city council and until his successor is appointed and qualified. C. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment for the un -expired portion of the term. D. Members of the commission shall serve without compensation unless otherwise provided for by the city council. E. Members of the commission may be reimbursed for actual expenses incurred in carrying out business of the planning commission provided such reimbursement is approved by the city council. (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.25.092 - Planning commission officer election. The planning commission shall elect a chairman and a vice-chairman from the appointed members. The planning commission shall appoint a secretary who need not be a member of the commission. Officers of the commission shall be elected annually. (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.25.093 - Planning commission meetings. The planning commission shall hold at least one regular meeting in each month. (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) about:blank 11/14/2016 Rohnert Park, CA Code of Ordinances Page 2 of 2 17.25.094 - Planning commission rules—Record keeping. The planning commission shall, subject to approval by the council, adopt rules for the transactions of business and shall keep a public record of its resolutions, transactions, findings, and determinations. (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.25.095 - Planning commission powers and duties. The planning commission shall have such powers and duties as may be assigned to it by the city council including that of board of appeals to hear appeals of zoning administrator decisions. (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) 17.25.096 - City council may function as planning commission. As an alternative to the establishment of a planning commission, the city council may by resolution designate the city council itself as the planning commission, in which event the city council shall perform all of the functions and duties of the planning commission as set forth in this title. Where separate public hearings are provided for before the planning commission and the city council, as in amendments to this title, these public hearings may be combined in the public hearing before the city council. (Ord. 695 § 3, 2003) about:blanlc 11/14/2016 r.. . -.. w`aw.. raw vl R.+"19i hit 1..19.1•V Bate: fry- Agenda Item H: Address:. # Phone: Topic; Brief Summary of Comments: See Reverse CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD Date: I _ `� Agenda Item #A- Name: Address: Phone: Brief Summary of Comments: