2016/12/13 City Council Resolution 2016-113RESOLUTION NO. 2016-113
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
ACCEPTING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FOR
FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2015 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2016
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section Government Code Section 66000 et
seq., the City of Rohnert Park is required to prepare an annual report regarding development
impact fees within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, staff has prepared a report that contains the information required by
Government Code Section 66000 et seq., a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated by this reference; and
WHEREAS, this report has been made available to the public not less than fifteen (15)
days from the date of the next regularly scheduled public meeting. The report has been available
for public review at the Clerk's office and on the City's website since November 28, 2016; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 66001 (d) requires a local agency to make
findings with respect to any unexpended funds for the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit
into the account or fund; and
WHEREAS, the City's Per Acre Development Fee Fund No. 110 contains unexpended
funds; and
WHEREAS, Per Acre Development Fee Fund No. 110 fees are to be used for the
expansion of the City's water system, including but not limited to production, storage,
distribution facilities and necessary engineering and planning studies; and
WHEREAS, there is a reasonable relationship between the Per Acre Development Fee
and its use, because the fee will be used for the expansion of the City's water system, including
but not limited to production, storage, distribution facilities and necessary engineering and
planning studies; and
WHEREAS, the approved land used plans and environmental documents for each
Specific Plan Area and Planned Development Area in the City require the construction of water
storage facilities and these improvements are slated for construction beginning in Fiscal Year
2016-17; and
WHEREAS, all funds available in the Per Acre Development Fund, which total
$628,585.64 will be used to fund construction of water storage facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Fund No. 147 contains unexpended
funds; and
2016-113
WHEREAS, Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Fund No. 147 serves as a mechanism for
non-residential development to offset the impacts created by new workers on the City's
affordable housing stock; and
WHEREAS, there is a reasonable relationship between the Affordable Housing Linkage
Fee and its use, because the fee will be used to assist in the construction of affordable housing
within the new developments; and
WHEREAS, Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Fund No. 147 have been deposited into
the City's Affordable Linkage Fee Fund No. 147; and
WHEREAS, the economic recession has constrained all residential development,
including affordable housing development until quite recently; and
WHEREAS, some funds available in the Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Fund, which
total $120,739.23 will be used to assist in the construction of affordable housing in the Southeast
Specific Plan Area in Fiscal Year 2017-18, with additional expenditures on future phases of
other affordable housing development throughout the city; and
WHEREAS, Traffic Signalization Fund No. 150 fees are to be used for traffic signals
installation in the Rohnert Park Major Thoroughfare District; and
WHEREAS, there is a reasonable relationship between the Traffic Signalization Fee and
its use, because the fee will be used to fund traffic signal installations or modifications on the
Snyder Lane Widening Project and a signal capacity project; and
WHEREAS, the Traffic Signalization Fees have been deposited into the City's Traffic
Signal Fund No. 150 and no additional funds are anticipated to be deposited into this fund
because the fee was eliminated in 2004; and
WHEREAS, funds available in the Traffic Signalization Fund, which total
$1,506,170.02 will be used in FY 16-17 on the Snyder Lane Widening Project for the traffic
signalization and a signal capacity increase study staring in Fiscal Year 2016-17 with the project
to follow in FY 17-18, and other signal projects intersecting Snyder Lane beginning in FY 2016-
17 through FY 2020; and
WHEREAS, the Copeland Creek Drainage Fee Fund No. 191 fees are to be used for
improvements to the Copeland Creek watershed to offset the impacts of new development; and
WHEREAS, there is a reasonable relationship between the Copeland Creek Drainage
Fund and its use, because the fee will be used to install mitigation planting in Copeland Creek;
and
WHEREAS, the Copeland Creek Drainage Fee have been deposited into the City's
Copeland Creek Drainage Fee Fund No. 19 land no additional funds are anticipated to be
deposited into this fund because the fee was eliminated in 2004; and
2
2016-113
WHEREAS, all funds available in the Copeland Creek Drainage Fee, which total
$54,147.14 will be used to install mitigation planting in Copeland Creek;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert
Park that the foregoing recitals are true and correct.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find and adopt as
follows:
1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66000 et seq., the City has conducted
an annual review of its development impact fees and capital infrastructure programs
and the Council has reviewed the Development Impact Fee Report for the fiscal year
2016-17.
2. The funds have been and shall be used for the purposes stated in said report and are
necessary to mitigate impacts resulting from development in the City and there is a
reasonable relationship between the use of the fees and the type of development
project upon which the fee is imposed.
The City's Per Acre Development Fee Fund No. 110 contains unexpended funds.
These fees are to be used for the expansion of the City's water system, including but
not limited to production, storage, distribution facilities and necessary engineering
and planning studies. There is a reasonable relationship between the Per Acre
Development Fee and its use, because the fee will be used for the expansion of the
City's water system, including but not limited to production, storage, distribution
facilities and necessary engineering and planning studies. The approved land used
plans and environmental documents for each Specific Plan Area and Planned
Development Area in the City require the construction of water storage facilities and
these improvements are slated for construction beginning in Fiscal Year 2016-17. All
funds available in the Per Acre Development Fund, which total $628,585.64 will be
used to fund construction of water storage facilities.
4. The Affordable Linkage Fee Fund No. 147 contains unexpended funds. The
Affordable Linkage Fee Fund No. 147 serves as a mechanism for non-residential
development to offset the impacts created by new workers on the City's affordable
housing stock. There is a reasonable relationship between the Affordable Linkage
Fee and its use, because the fee will be used to assist in the construction of affordable
housing within the new developments. Some funds available in the Affordable
Linkage Fee Fund, which total $120,739.23 will be used to assist in the construction
of affordable housing in the Southeast Specific Plan Area in Fiscal Year 2017-18,
with additional expenditures on future phases of other affordable housing
development throughout the city.
The Traffic Signalization Fund No. 150 fees are to be used for traffic signals
installation in the Rohnert Park Major Thoroughfare District. There is a reasonable
2016-113
relationship between the Traffic Signalization Fee and its use, because the fee will be
used to fund traffic signal installations or modifications on the Snyder Lane Widening
Project and a signal capacity project. All funds available in the Traffic Signalization
Fund, which total $1,506,170.02 will be used on the Snyder Lane Widening Project
for the traffic signalization portion of the project and the signal capacity increase
project staring in Fiscal Year 2016-17.
The Copeland Creek Drainage Fee Fund No. 191 fees are to be used for
improvements to the Copeland Creek watershed to offset the impacts of new
development. There is a reasonable relationship between the Copeland Creek
Drainage Fund and its use, because the fee will be used to install mitigation planting
in Copeland Creek. All funds available in the Copeland Creek Drainage Fee, which
total $54,147.14 will be used to install mitigation planting in Copeland Creek;
7. The Council hereby approves, accepts and adopts the Development Impact Fee
Report for the fiscal year 2015-16.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2016.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
'96&t -
Gin d tort , ayor
ATTEST:
oow" -
Caitlin Saldanha, Deputy City Clerk
Attachment: Exhibit A
AHANOTlJ: CALLINAN W 5TAFFOP-D: MACKENZiE: k
J�f3ELFORTE:
AYES: ( S) NOES: ( V) ABSENT:( d) ABSTAIN:( 0)
4
2016-113
Exhibit A
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT
Fiscal Year July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016
Issued on November 28, 2016
State Law (Government Code Section 66006), requires each local agency that imposes AB 1600
development impact fees to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those
fees. Further, it stipulates that fees imposed on new development have the proper nexus to any
project on which they are imposed.
AB 1600 imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected.
The fees must be segregated from the General Fund and from other funds or accounts containing
fees collected for other improvements. Each fund must earn its own interest and be used for the
same purpose as the fee collected.
The report shall be completed within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, and made
available to the public at least 15 days in advance of the public meeting at which the report is
presented. The following information should be contained in the report:
• A description of the type fee in the account or fund.
■ The amount of the fee.
• The beginning and ending balances of each fund for which the impact fees were
collected.
• The amount of fee collected and the corresponding interest earned.
• An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the
amounts expensed on each such improvement including the total percentage of the
cost of the public improvement that was funded with the fees.
• An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public
improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have
been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement.
• A description of any interfund transfer, loan or any refund made for each impact fee
fund including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will
be expended, and in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be
repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
• The amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collect to complete
financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of
funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenue exceeded
the amount to be refunded.
PER ACRE DEVELOPMENT FEE (Fund No. 110)
This fee was established per Resolution 79-08 and provides for the expansion of the City's water
system, including but not limited to production, storage, distribution facilities and necessary
engineering and planning studies. The City has not previously programmed capital projects related
to water production, storage and distribution facilities, because there are insufficient funds
collected at this time. However, the approved land used plans and environmental documents for
each Specific Plan Area and Planned Development Area in the City require the construction of
water storage facilities. These improvements are slated for construction beginning in Fiscal Year
2016-17. No interfund transfers or loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or
allocations were made pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: $17,715.00 per acre
Fund Balance, Receipts, and Interest Earned:
Beginning Balance:
Adjustment to Fund Balance
Receipts
Interest
Expenditures
Ending Balance:
$ 483,238.92
0.00
142,575.16
2,771.56
0.00
$ 628,585.64
2
Five Year Revenue Test
Revenues
Expenditures
Adjustments
Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 10/11
$ 2,811.59
FY 2011/12
$ 320.80
$ 0.00
$
0.00
3,132.39
FY 2012/13
28,642.54
0.00
0.00
31,774.93
FY 2013/14
334,331.05
0.00
0.00
366,105.98
FY 2014/15
116,853.34
0.00
279.60
483,238.92
FY 2015/16
145,346.72
0.00
0.00
628,585.64
Totals
$ 628,306.04
$ 0.00
$
279.60
$ 628,585.64
Result: Fi\e year spent test not met in accordance with Go\,emment Code 66001.
2
PER ACRE DEVELOPMENT FEE (Fund No. 110) continued:
The table below shows the planned usage of the Per Acre Development Fee funds that were not
spent within the 5 year period, but retain a reasonable relationship between the Per Acre
Development Fee and its use, because the fee will be used for construction of water storage
facilities in FY 16-17.
Per Acre Development Fee Future Public
% of Project
Project # Project Name Expenditure Funded with Fee
N/A University District Water Tank $5,000,000.00 100.00%
N/A Updated Tank Sizing & Location Analysis 50,000.00 100.00%
Total Expenditures $5,050,000.00
3
SEWER CAPACITY CHARGE (Fund No. 120)
This fee was established per Resolution 2008-127. The fee served as the mechanism by which the
City of Rohnert Park collected from new development the funds necessary to pay for the
Incremental Recycled Water Program (IRWP) Capacity Expansion Projects that benefit new
development. The City is no longer collecting for Sewer capacity charge. This fee was
incorporated into the Public Facilities Fee on November 22, 2011. An outstanding receivable is
due in the amount of $1,030. As the receivable is collected, the funds are transferred to the Sewer
Enterprise Fund to pay for a portion of the City's share of the expansion of the Subregional
Wastewater System Expansion debt service. No loans were made from this fund. In addition, no
refunds or allocations were made pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section
66001.
Amount of Fee: NA -No longer collected
Fund Balance, Receipts, and Interest Earned:
Beginning Balance:
$ 0.00
Adjusment to Fund Balance
0.00
Receipts
3,395.56
Interest
156.43
Expenditures
3,551.99
Ending Balance:
$ 0.00
Five Year Revenue Test
Revenues Expenditures Adjustments Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2010111 $ 1,381,908.16
FY 2011/2012
$ 133,793.40
$ 967,846.44 $
0.00
547,855.12
FY 2012/2013
340,907.56
888,762.68
0.00
0.00
FY 2013/2014
3,047.62
3,047.62
0.00
0.00
FY 2014/2015
3,007.07
3,007.07
0.00
0.00
FY 2015/2016
3,551.99
3,551.99
0.00
0.00
Totals $ 484,307.64
$ 1,866,215.80 $
0.00
$ 0.00
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001
4
SEWER CAPACITY CHARGE (Fund No. 120), continued:
Sewer Capacity Charge Public Improvement FY 15-16 Expenditures
% of Project
Project # Project Name Expenditure Funded with Fee
N/A Subregional Wastewater System $ 3,551.99 N/A
Total Expenditures $ 3,551.99
AFFORDABLE HOUSING LINKAGE FEE (Fund No. 147)
This fee was established per Resolution 2006-277. The fee serves as a mechanism for non-
residential development to offset the impacts created by new workers on the City's affordable
housing stock. The City has not programmed capital projects related to affordable housing because
there are insufficient funds collected at this time. However, as development proceeds in the City's
Specific Plan and Planned Development Areas, the fee revenue will be used to assist in the
construction of affordable housing within the new developments. These improvements are slated
for construction beginning in Fiscal Year 2017-18. No interfund transfers or loans were made from
this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations were made pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of
Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: $0.69 per commercial square foot
$1.19 per retail square foot
$0.71 per industrial square foot
Fund Balance, Receipts, and Interest Earned:
Beginning Balance:
$ 120,487.81
Adjustment to Balance
0.00
Receipts
195.96
Interest
55.46
Expenditures
0.00
Ending Balance:
$ 120,739.23
The City plans to expend $15,000 in Affordable Housing Linkage Fee revenue to assist in the
construction of affordable housing in the Southeast Specific Plan Area in 2017-18, with additional
expenditures on future phases of that development.
Z
Five Year Revenue Test
Revenues
Expenditures Adjustments
Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2010/11
$ 24,850.00
FY 2011/12
$ 2,253.54
$ 0.00 $
0.00
27,103.54
FY 2012/13
3,185.40
0.00
0.00
30,288.94
FY 2013/14
1,552.50
0.00
0.00
31,841.44
FY 2014/15
88,646.37
0.00
0.00
120,487.81
FY 2015/16
251.42
0.00
0.00
120,739.23
Totals
$ 95,889.23
$ 0.00 $
0.00
$ 120,739.23
Result: Five year spent test not met in accordance with
Government Code 66001.
The City plans to expend $15,000 in Affordable Housing Linkage Fee revenue to assist in the
construction of affordable housing in the Southeast Specific Plan Area in 2017-18, with additional
expenditures on future phases of that development.
Z
TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION FEE (Fund No. 150)
This fee was established per Resolution 79-84 for the construction of traffic signals at planned
intersections. This fee was superseded by the Public Facilities Fee on July 13, 2004.
No loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations were made pursuant to
subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: NA -No longer collected
Fund Balance, Receipts, and Interest Earned:
Beginning Balance: $ 1,507,282.17
Adjument to Balance 0.00
Receipts 0.00
Interest 8,308.11
Expenditures 9,420.26
Ending Balance: $ 1,506,170.02
Five Year Revenue Test
Traffic Signalization Fee Public Improvernents FY 15-16 Expenditures
% of Project
Project # Project Name Expenditure Funded with Fee
2016-03 TR -102 Traffic Flow Improvement Study $ 9,420.26 100.00%'
Total Expenditures $ 9,420.26
7
Revenues
Expenditures
Adjustments
Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2010/11
$ 1,862,107.07
FY 2011/12
$ 12,731.13
$ 113,606.28
$ 0.00
1,761,231.92
FY 2012/13
8,426.66
281,006.91
0.00
1,488,651.67
FY 2013/14
13,814.32
0.00
0.00
1,502,465.99
FY 2014/15
4,816.18
0.00
0.00
1, 507, 282.17
FY 2015/16
8,308.11
9,420.26
0.00
1,506,170.02
Totals
$ 48,096.40
$ 404,033.45
$ 0.00
$ 1,506,170.02
Result: Fi\,e year spent test not met
in accordance with Government Code 66001.
Traffic Signalization Fee Public Improvernents FY 15-16 Expenditures
% of Project
Project # Project Name Expenditure Funded with Fee
2016-03 TR -102 Traffic Flow Improvement Study $ 9,420.26 100.00%'
Total Expenditures $ 9,420.26
7
TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION FEE (Fund No. 150) continued:
The table below shows the planned usage of the Traffic Signalization Fee funds that were not spent
within the 5 year period, but retain a reasonable relationship between the Traffic Signalization Fee
and its use, because the fee will be used to pay for the signalization portion of the Snyder Lane
Widening Project in FY 2016-17; a Medical Center/Snyder and Jasmine project beginning in FY
2016-17; Commerce and Snyder project programmed for FY 2019-20 and the Signal Capacity
Increasing Project, the study is programmed for FY 2016-17 and the remainder programmed for
FY 2017-18.
rrattic Signalization Fee Future Pumic Improvementy
r-
% of Project
Project #
Project Name
Expenditure
Funded with Fee
2014-01
Snyder Lane Widening
$ 240,000.00
2.80%
N/A
Medical Center/Snyder and Jasmine Signals
500,000.00
100.00%
N/A
Commerce and Snyder
700,000.00
100.00%
N/A
Signal Capacity Increasing Project
650,000.00
100.00%
Total Expenditures
$ 2,090,000.00
r-
CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND FEE (Fund No. 160)
This fee was established per Ordinance 47 for the acquisition, improvement, and expansion of
public parks, playgrounds, open space, recreation facilities, and community facilities such as fire
stations, libraries, civic auditoriums, civic centers, and sports stadiums. This fee was superseded
by the Public Facilities Fee on July 13, 2004 and is no longer collected.
The money is used as the City has applicable projects. It was anticipated in FY 2013-14 that these
funds would be used to pay for the Sports Center Locker Room Retrofit project; however a new
funding source, 2007R bond proceeds was identified and used instead. These remaining funds will
be transferred to a capital projects fund to pay for the majority of the M Park Tennis Courts
rehabilitation in FY 2015-16 and will be exhausted by the end of the fiscal year. No loans were
made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations were made pursuant to subdivisions
(e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: NA -No longer collected
Fund Balance, Receipts, and Interest Earned:
Beginning Balance: $ 205,121.97
Adjument to Balance 0.00
Receipts 9,645.24
Interest 0.00
Expenditures 214, 767.21
Ending Balance: $ 0.00
Capital Outlay Fund Fee Public Improvement rY io-ib it:xpenuitures
% of Project
Project # Project Name Expenditure Funded with Fee
2015-02 M Section Tennis Courts 214,767.21 70.87%
Total Expenditures $ 214,767.21
D
Five Year Revenue Test
Revenues Expenditures
Adjustments
Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2010/11
$ 217,326.04
FY 2011/12
$ 1,501.53 $ 0.00
$ 0.00
218, 827.57
FY 2012/13
1,124.44 0.00
0.00
219, 952.01
FY 2013/14
648.12 9,645.44
0.00
210, 954.69
FY 2014/15
898.10 6,655.50
(75.32)
205,121.97
FY 2015/16
9,645.24 214,767.21
0.00
0.00
Totals
$ 13,817.43 $ 231,068.15
$ (75.32)
$ 0.00
Result: Fi\,te year spent test met in accordance with Goternment Code 66001
Capital Outlay Fund Fee Public Improvement rY io-ib it:xpenuitures
% of Project
Project # Project Name Expenditure Funded with Fee
2015-02 M Section Tennis Courts 214,767.21 70.87%
Total Expenditures $ 214,767.21
D
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE (Fund No. 165)
This fee was updated per Resolution 2008-126 and shall be solely used for; (a) the purposes
described in the Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP); (b) for reimbursing the City for the
development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City; or (c) for
reimbursing developers who have constructed public facilities described in the PFFP or other
facility master plans adopted from time to time by the City Council where those facilities were
beyond that needed to mitigate the impacts of the developer's project or projects. All expenditures
from this fund are in the form of transfers to capital project funds.
In FY 2014-15 an audit adjustment was made that recognized 2 loans that were made in prior fiscal
years to this fund for development projects. The first loan was from the former Redevelopment
Agency for Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase I in the amount of $10,055,725, and the second was a
loan from the Sewer Enterprise fund to catch up for prior year debt service payments that should
have been made from this fund in the amount of $1,222,382. The remaining loan balances at June
28, 2016 are $9,555,725 and $1,227,687 respectively.
No loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations were made pursuant to
subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: See Attachment 1
Fund Balance, Receipts, and Interest Earned:
Beginning Balance:
$ (7,911,396.83)
Adjustment to Fund Balance
0.00
Receipts
5, 292, 403.79
Interest
23, 024.20
Expenditures
7, 373, 057.92
Ending Balance:
$ (9,969,026.76)
10
Five Year Revenue Test
Revenues
Expenditures
Adjustments
Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2010/11
$ 754,235.64
FY 2011/12
$ 39,559.83
$ 129,630.54
$ 0.00
664,164.93
FY 2012/13
13,117, 204.97
698, 099.58
0.00
13, 083, 270.32
FY 2013/14
2, 598, 968.03
9,211,117.62
0.00
6,471,120.73
FY 2014/15
2,761,610.60
5,869,147.00
(11,274,981.16)
(7,911,396.83)
FY 2015/16
5,315,427.99
7,373,057.92
0.00
(9,969,026.76)
Totals
$ 23,832,771.42
$23,281,052.66
$ (11,274,981.16)
$ (9,969,026.76)
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001
10
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE (Fund No. 165) continued
Project #
2005-03
2011-11
2014-01
N/A
N/A
yunnc Facinties reeyuwic Improvement rT -m-io t_xpenaitures
Proiect Name
Recycled Water Expansion
Dowdell Ave Construction
ESTS - Phase III/Snyder Lane Widening
Subregional Wastewater System Debt Service
2005 Sewer COPS Debt Service (Expansion)
Total Expenditures
11
% of Project
Expenditure
Funded with Fee
$ 9,601.65
100.00%
3,103.50
100.00%
6, 382, 374.69
80.00%
769,173.98
N/A
208, 804.10
N/A
$ 7,373,057.92
COPELAND CREEK DRAINAGE (Fund No. 191)
This fee was established per Resolution 67-64 for improvements to the Copeland Creek watershed
to offset the impacts of new development. This fee was superseded by the Public Facilities Fee on
July 13, 2004 and is no longer collected.
The City has not programmed capital projects in the Copeland Creek watershed largely because of
delays in development. However, the City has budgeted the full available balance in Fund No. 191
for a contract with California Conservation Corps North Bay to install mitigation planting in
Copeland Creek. The mitigation planting was necessitated by improvements to the bridge at
Copeland Creek and Snyder Lane that serves new development. The funds will be exhausted by
the end of Fiscal Year 2016-17. No interfund transfers or loans were made from this fund. In
addition, no refunds or allocations were made pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government
Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: NA — No longer collected
Fund Balance, Receipts, and Interest Earned:
Beginning Balance:
Adjustment to Fund Balance
Receipts
Interest
Expenditures
Ending Balance:
$ 53,850.19
0.00
0.00
296.95
0.00
$ 54,147.14
12
Five Year Revenue Test
Revenues Expenditures
Adjustments
Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2011/12
0.00
FY 2011/12
$ 31.50 $ 0.00
$ 0.00
31.50
FY 2012/13
54,505.46 0.00
0.00
54,536.96
FY 2013/14
72.20 234.00
0.00
54,375.16
FY 2014/15
231.03 756.00
0.00
53,850.19
FY 2015/16
296.95 0.00
0.00
54,147.14
Totals
$ 55,137.14 $ 990.00
$ 0.00
$ 54,147.14
Result: Fi\,e year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001.
12
WILFRED DOWDELL PUBLIC SAFETY MITIGATION PROGRAM
(Fund No. 315)
This fee was established per resolution 14-129 for the Wilfred Dowdell Public Safety Equipment
Mitigation Fee. The fee mitigates impacts to the City's public safety department as a result of
development in the Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan Areas. Specifically the fee provides for the
purchase of equipment needed to outfit the additional Public Safety Officer required as a result
of Project development.
The City has not programmed purchases of public safety outfit gear because there are insufficient
funds available at this time. The City will utilize fee revenue to purchase public safety outfit gear
including a vehicle and turnout gear as soon as sufficient funds are available. No interfund
transfers or loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations were made
pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: $1,867.01 per acre
Fund Balance, Receipts, and Interest Earned:
Beginning Balance:
$ 13,024.24
Adjument to Balance
0.00
Receipts
0.00
Interest
71.82
Expenditures
0.00
Ending Balance:
$ 13,096.06
13
Five Year Revenue Test
Revenues Expenditures
Adjustments
Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2010/11
$ 0.00
FY 2011/12
$ 0.00 $ 0.00
$ 0.00
0.00
FY 2012/13
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
FY 2014/15
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
FY 2014/15
13, 024.24 0.00
0.00
13, 024.24
FY 2015/16
71.82 0.00
0.00
13,096.06
Totals
$ 13,096.06 $ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 13,096.06
Result: Fire year spent test met in accordance
with Government Code 66001
13
Development Fees
ATTACHMENT 1
Public Facility Fee PFF -'flte public facility fee consists of a population mitigation fee, a traffic mitigation fee, a
component mitigation fee, and an administrative fee. The PFF is used to fund the construction of wide range of
infrastructure to support the City's General Plan. The PFF arnount charged to a development is based on which area the
development will be constructed.
Table 1 Residential Fees
Land Use
Infill East
Infill
Northeast
University
Southeast
Sonoma
Northwest
Wilfred
Stadium
Canon Manor
Designation
of Hwy
West of
SPA
District SPA
SPA
Mountain
SPA
Dowdell
Lands PD
SPA
101
Hwy 101
SPA
Village
SPA
SPA
Cenerai officL
$9,045
$10,491
NA
$9,498
$9,498
1'D
$10,491
$10,491
$10,491
NA
Single
$19,664
$21,282
$30,506
$30,940
$28,007
$24,018
NA
NA
NA
$22,031
Family
$6,475
$7,216
NA
$6,641
$6,641
$6,641
$7,006
$7,006
$7,006
NA
Residential
Llnit
$13,585
$14,505
NA
$13,873
_
$18,124
$13,873
$14,505
$14,505
$14,505
NA
Multi -Family
$12,691
$13,703
$18,978
$19,081
$15,520
$14,089
NA
$14,189
$14,386
Residential
Light
$2,912
$3,246
NA
$3,016
$3,016
$3,016
$3,246
$3,246
$3,246
unit)
Industrial
NA
_
NA
-
NA
NA
Senior
$12,020
$13,032
NA
NA
NA
NA
Housing
-
Heavy
$2,912
$3,246
NA
$3;016
$3,016
(unit)
$3,246
$3,246
$3,246
NA
Industrial
Assisted
$10,453
$10,959
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Livin unit
Warehouse
$2,342
$2,677
NA
$2,447
$2,447
Table 2 Non -Residential Fees Applied to Enclosed Thousand Square Feet (TSF)
Land Usc
Infill East
Infill West
Northeast
University
Southeast
Sonoma
Northwest
Wilfred
Stadium
Canon
Designation
of Hwy
of flwy
SPA
District
SPA
Mountain
SPA
Dowdell
Lands PD
Manor
101
101
SPA
Villa&c PD
SPA
SPA
Cenerai officL
$9,045
$10,491
NA
$9,498
$9,498
$9,498
$10,491
$10,491
$10,491
NA
(eneloscd iso
-
Hotel/Motel
$6,475
$7,216
NA
$6,641
$6,641
$6,641
$7,006
$7,006
$7,006
NA
(enclosed tsf)
IteLail
$13,585
$14,505
NA
$13,873
$13,873
$13,873
$14,505
$14,505
$14,505
NA
(enelosetl 14
Light
$2,912
$3,246
NA
$3,016
$3,016
$3,016
$3,246
$3,246
$3,246
NA
Industrial
(enclosed is
-
Heavy
$2,912
$3,246
NA
$3;016
$3,016
$3,016
$3,246
$3,246
$3,246
NA
Industrial
(enclosed tsf)
Warehouse
$2,342
$2,677
NA
$2,447
$2,447
$2,447
$2,677
$2,677
$2,677
NA
(tsl
Table 3 Non -Residential Fees Applied to Gallons of Wastewater Generated (GAL)
Land Use
Infill East
Infill West
Northeast
University
Southeast
Sonoma
Northwest
Wilfred
Stadium
Canon
Designation
of Ilwy
of Hwy
SPA
District
SPA
Mountain
SPA
Dowdell
lands PD
Manor
101
101
SPA
Village PD
SPA
SPA
General Office
$70.37
$70.37
NA
$119.83
$116.47
I
$116.47
$70.37
$70.37
$70.37
$116.47
(enclosed ts1)
„
Hotel/Motel
$70.37
$70.37
NA
$119.83
$116.47
$116.47
$70.37
$70.37
$70.37
$116.47
enclosed tsf)
Retail
$70.37
$70.37
NA
$119.83
$116.47
$116.47
$70.37
$70.37
$70.37
$116.47
enclosed Isf
Light
$70.37
$70.37
NA
_
$119.83
$116.47
$116.47
$70.37
$70.37
$70.37
$116.47
Industrial
enclosed 1st.
Heavy
$70.37
$70.37
NA
$119.83
$116.47
$116.47
$70.37
$70.37
$70.37
$116.47
Industrial
enclosed ISI)
Warehouse
$70.37
$70.37
NA
$119.83
$116.47
$116.47
$70.37
$70.37
$70.37
$116.47
is
Table 4 Non -Residential Fees Applied to Disturbed Site Area (TSF)
Land Use
Infill East
Infill West
Northeast
University
Southeast
Sonoma
Northwest
Wilfred
Stadium
O'uiun
Designation
of I lwy
of Hwy
SPA
District
SPA
Mountain
SPA
Dowdell
Lands PD
Manor
101
101
SPA
Villa e PD
SPA
SPA
General Office
NA
NA
NA
$292.22
NA
NA
$265.95
$265.95
$265.95
NA
(enclosed tsf)
Hotel/Mtitcl
NA
NA
NA
$292.22
NA
NA
$265.95
$265.95
$265.95
NA
(enclosed tsf)
Retail
NA
NA
NA
$292.22
NA
NA
$265.95
$265.95
$265.95
NA
enclosed tsf)
Light
NA
NA
NA
$292.22
NA
NA
$265.95
$265.95
$265,95
NA
Industrial
(enclosed tst)
Heavy
NA
NA
NA
$292.22
NA
NA
_
$265.95
$265.95
$265.95
NA
industrial
enclosed tsf)
Warehouse
NA
NA
NA
$292.22
NA
NA
$265.95
$265.95
$265.95
NA
is
Attachment I A
Public Facilities Fee Schedule Notes
1. See 2011 Update to the Public Facilities Finance Plan for detailed presentation of calculations. (Adopted by City
Council Resolution)
2. "Infill Development' is all development (new, remodel or reconstruction) outside ofthe defined Specific Plan
Areas or Planned Developments
3. Non-residential fees are calculated by summing the values from Tables 2, 3, and 4 for the type of land use
proposed.
4. "Mixed Use" fees are calculated by summing the fees calculated for each type of land use within the mixed use
proposal.
5. NA or Not Applicable means that a particular fee component does not apply within the defined geographic area
because:
a. New development within that geographic does not create impacts to certain infrastructure systems; or
b. Approved Specific Plans do not include certain land use classes, hence fee components have not been
computed.
6. Enclosed Thousand Square Feet is calculated based on the gross floor area, as defined in Chapter 17.04 of the
Municipal Code including any patio area under a horizontal projection of the roof, the floor above or other
covering, when such area is used for activities integral to the commercial business.
7. Disturbed Thousand Square Feet is calculated based on the total area approved for grading on the property.