The URL can be used to link to this page

2000/12/12 City Council Agenda PacketCity of Rohnert Park ® 6750 Commerce Boulevard i e Rohnert Park, California 94928 �j ROHNERT PARK. CITY COUNCIL, Community Development Commission i z Rohnert Park Financing Authority Opt',, - I Rohnert Park District CONCURRENT MEETINGS O I, 666 , AGENDA o 'Tuesday, December 12, 2000 a 6:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION.- COUNCIL WILL MEET IN CLOSED SESSION IN THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE PRIOR TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING TO CONSIDER: • Litigation matters (G.C. 54956.9) 6:55 p.m. REGULAR SESSION - Open' Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call (Flores_Mackenzie_Reilly_Spiro_Vidak-Martinez)- L Mayor's Report on Closed Session (G.C. 54957.1) 2. Approval of.Minutes - November 28, 2000 7:00 p.m. , a 3. Unscheduled public appearances: For public comment -on items not listed on the agenda, or on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time (limited to 3..-5 minutes per appearance & a 30 minute total time limit, or allocation of time based on number of speaker cards submitted) PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING - *SEE NOTE ON LAST PAGE OF THIS AGENDA 4 7:30 p.m. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the consent calendar Will be considered in toto by one, action of the Council unless any Councilmember or anyone, else interested in any matter on the consent calendar has a question about same. A. Acknowledging the City Manager/Clerk's report on the :posting of the meeting's agenda B. Approval of Bills/Demands for Payment concurrently for: • City of Rohnert Park/City Council • Community Development Commission C. Accepting Cash/Investments Report for Month End, July 31, 2000 concurrently for: • City of Rohnert Park/City Council • Community Development Commission • Rohnert Park Financing Authority D. Ordinance for Adoption-:, No. 661 Repealing Municipal Code Chapter 17.64, Wireless Communication Facilities, and Adding a New Chapter 17.64, Communication Facilities City of Rohnert Park CONCURRENT MEETINGS Menda (2) December 12, 2000 for City CounciUCommunity Development. CommissionlRohnert Park Financing AuthoriolRohnert Park District E. Resolution for Adoption: 2000-236 Declaring Results of Consolidated General Election and Municipal Election Held in the City of Rohnert Park on November 7, 2000 5. 7:35 p.m. CEREMONYFOR CITY COUNCIL OFFICER SELECTIONS Aro_Y � ,for the YEAR 2001 , #Reflections of 2000 - Comments by Council Members, if any #Presentation to Mayor Vicki Vidak-Martinez for 2000 Year as Mayor #Administration of Oath of Office & Presentation of Certificate of Election to Council Members Elect. Jake Mackenzie Linda -Spiro Vicki Vidak Martinez #Recognition of the Selections of City Council Officers for Year 2001 ®Mayor Jake Mackenzie & Vice Mayor Armando F. Flores #Perspectives for 2001- Comments by Council Members, if any # Other Informational Matters from/for Council, if any # Other Unscheduled Public Appearances, if any (limited to S minutes per appearance with an unrestricted total time limit) #Adjournment to Refreshments THOUGHTS TO PONDER: e Sometimes you gotta create what you want to be a part of. - Geri Weitzman If we cannot now end our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. - John F. Kennedy o I was.wise enough to never grow up while fooling most people into believing I had. -Margaret Mead JH-h:agaidas/121200ag Citv of Rohnert Park CONCURRENT MEETINGS Agenda (3) December 12, 2000 for City Council/Community Development CommissionlRohnert Park Financing Authority/Rohnert Park District NO'T'E: Time shown for any particular matter on the agenda is an estimate only. Matters may be considered earlier or later than the time indicated depending on the pace at which the meeting proceeds. If you wish to speak on an item under discussion by the Council which appears on this agenda, after receiving recognition from the Mayor, please walk to the rostrum and state your name and address for the record. - PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING - Any item raised by a member of the public which is not agendized and may require Council action shall be automatically referred to staff for investigation and disposition which may include placing on a future agenda. If the item is deemed to be an emergency or the need to take action arose after posting of the agenda within the meaning of Government Code Section 54954.2(b), Council is entitled to discuss the hatter to determine if it is an emergency item under said Government Code and may take action thereon. DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City Offices at (707) 588-2200 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation by the City. Please make sure the City Manager's office is notified as soon as possible if you . have a visual impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another format (Braille, audio -tape, etc.) JH-h:agendas/121200ag NOTICE OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR HOLDING A CLOSED MEETING of the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF ROHNERT PARK December 12, 2000 LOCATION: City Manager's Office at City Hall, 6750 Commerce Blvd., Rohnert Park, Ca. TIME: 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter. as the listed agenda item for the closed session is reached Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54950 et.seq., the City Council will hold a closed session. More specific information regarding this meeting is provided as follows: eLitigation matters (G.C. 54956.9) - Possible litigation - one case City anager/City:Clerk Attachment to: City of Rohnert Park City Council Agenda Dec. 12, 2000 JH-h:agaida/121200ag City of RohnertPark 9 6750 Commerce Boulevard Rohnert Park, California 94928 ROIINERT PARK CITY COUNCIL r Community Development Commission Rohnert Park Financing Authority Rohnert Park District CONCURRENT MEETINGS O�. AGENDA o Tuesday, December 12, 2000_ p90 6:00 p.m. 0 CLOSED SESSION.- COUNCIL WILL MEET IN CLOSED SESSION IN THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE .PRIOR TO THE, REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING TO CONSIDER: • Litigation matters (G.C. 54956.9) 6:55 p. mi. REGULAR SESSION Open Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call (Flores_Mackenzie_Reilly_Spiro_Vidak-Martinez 1. Mayor's Report on Closed Session (G.C. 54957.1) 2. Approval of,Minutes -November 28, 2000 7:00 p.m. 3. Unscheduled public appearances: For public comment on items not listed'on the agenda, or on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time (limited to 375 minutes per appearance & a 30 minute total time limit, or allocation of time based on number of speaker cards submitted) PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING - *SEE NOTE ON LAST PAGE OF THIS AGENDA 7:30 p.m. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the consent calendar Will be considered in toto by one, action of the Council unless any Councilmember or anyone else interested in any matter on the consent calendar has a question about same. A. Acknowledging the City Manager/Clerk's report on the posting of the meeting's agenda B. Approval of Bills/Demands for Payment concurrently for: • City of Rohnert Park/City Council • Community Development Commission C. Accepting Cash/hwestments Report for Month End, July 31, 2000 concurrently for: • City. of Rohnert Park/City Council • Community Development Commission • Rohnert Park Financing Authority D. Ordinance for Adoption:. No. 661 Repealing Municipal Code Chapter 17.64, Wireless Communication Facilities, and Adding a New Chapter 17.64, Communication Facilities City of Rohnert Park CONCURRENT MEETINGS Aizenda (2) December 12, 2000 for City CouncillCommunity Development Commission/Rohnert Park Financing Authority/Rohnert Park District E. Resolution for Adoption: 2000-236 Declaring Results of Consolidated General Election and Municipal Election Meld in the City of Rohnert Park on November 7, 2000 5. 7:35 p.m. � - CERE14101VY F®l� � CITY COUNCIL OFFICER SELECTIONS for the YEAR 2001 0 #Reflections of 2000 - Comments by Council Members, if any ®Presentation to Mayor Vicki Vidak-Martinez for 2000 Year as Mayor #Administration of Oath of Office & Presentation of Certificate of Election to Council Members Elect. Aake Mackenzie Linda Spiro Vicki Vdak-Martinez ♦Recognition of the Selections of City Council Officers for Year 2001 *Mayor Jake Mackenzie & Vice Mayor Armando E Flores Perspectivesfor 2001- Comments by Council Members, if any i Other Informational Matters from/for Council, if any ♦ Other Unscheduled Public Appearances, if any (limited to S minutes per appearance with an unrestricted total time limit) ♦Adjournment to Refreshments THOUGHTS TO POAMER: Sometimes you gotta create what you want to be a part of. - Geri Weitzman • If we cannot now end our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity.- John F. Kennedy • 1 was.wise enough to never grow up while fooling most people into believing I had. -Margaret Mead JH-h:agendas/121200ag City of Rohnert Park CONCURRENT MEETINGS Agenda (3) December 12, 2000 for City Council/Community Development Commission/Rohnert Park Financing Authority/Rohnert Park District NOTE: Time shown for any particular matter on the agenda is an estimate only. Matters may be considered earlier or later than the time indicated depending on the pace at which the meeting proceeds. If you wish to speak on an item under discussion by the Council which appears on this agenda, after receiving recognition from the Mayor, please walk to the rostrum and state your name and address for the record. - PLEASE F LL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING - Any item raised by a member of the public which is not agendized and may require Council action shall be automatically referred to staff for investigation and disposition which may include placing on a future agenda. If the item is deemed to be an emergency or the need to take action arose after posting of the agenda within the meaning of Government Code Section 54954.2(b), Council is entitled to discuss the matter to determine if it is an emergency item under said Government Code and may take action thereon. DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City Offices at (707) 588-2200 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation by the City. Please make sure the City Manager's office is notified as soon as possible if you have a visual impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another format (Braille, audio -tape, etc.) JH-h:ageadas/121200ag NOTICE OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR HOLDING A CLOSED MEETING of the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF ROHNERT PARI December 12, 2000 LOCATION: City Manager's Office at City Hall, 6750 Commerce Blvd., Rohnert Park, Ca. TIME: 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter.as the listed agenda item for the closed session is reached Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54950 et.seq., the City Council, will hold a closed session. More specific information regarding this meeting is provided as follows: °Litigation matters (G.C. 54956.9) - Possible litigation - one case City anager/City.Clerk Attachment to: City of Rohnert Park City Council Agenda Dec. 12, 2000 JH-h:agenda/121200ag CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CA " Date: eC, D 2 Name• C'--C;`O��` C�� f �'�� % - Address: 56 CCS TJX,El q-�SZ Phone: 767 7 7i� ? 25 e TOPIC: GamR A Brief Summary of Comments: ti VBG -114 LV 87-6 n Z4 L lF/ => See Reverse Oath of Office STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA For the OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rohnert Park, do you, Jake Mackenzie, Linda Spiro, and Vicki Vidak Martinez, solemnly -swear ,(or affirm) that you will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that you take this obligation freely,` without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which you are about to enter. ---------------------------- Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of --------------------- (Name) --------------------- (Title) 1111n rro cMT 0 100A LAKE MENDOCINO RESERVOIR - WATER SUPPLY POOL FLOOD CONTROL POOL SILT STORAGE THE RUSSIAN RIVER WATER SYSTEM �c LAKE LAKE P/LLSBURY CAPE HORN VAN ARSDALE DAM POWER PLANT I LAKE PILLSBURY SCOTT DAM RESERVOIR- ` TUNNEL IC1 I WATER STORAGE CAPACITY 86,388 A.F. POTTER. VALLEY SCOTT DAM- Ll HEIGHT 130 FT. (j I LENGTH 805 FT. TOP ELEVATION 1,838.5 FT. P5� ' SPILLWAY ELEVATION 1,818.3 FT. 70,000 A.F. 551P� J, 48,000 A.F. 4,500 A.F. LAKE r MENDOC/NCL TOTAL 122,500 A.F. CO 7E ? COYOTE DAM- DAM HEIGHT 151 FT. UKIAH i LENGTH 3,532 FT, TOP ELEVATION 784 FT, oI SPILLWAY ELEVATION 765 FT. $ I I o TOP OF WATER SUPPLY POOL 737.5 FT. L °L I I I� I HOPLAND I Il TYPICAL MULTIPURPOSE RESERVOIR OF THE RUSSIAN RIVER PROJECT TYPICAL WATER COLLECTOR OF THE l ^ RUSSIAN RIVER PROJECT L� L — — R v 9 �o 90 MIRABEL FORESTVILLE HWY 116 WOHLER PETALUm-'.., rl&lt r LEGEND WWRIIIIIIIIII` ICLOVERDALE WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINES 00000 NORTH MARIN TRANSMISSION PIPELINE 13 COLLECTORS (PUMPING PLANTS) MENDO_C/NO COY/NTY_ J BOOSTER STATIONS 1 EMERGENCY WELLS 4. SCWA CONTRACTOR SERVICE AREAS SONOMA COUNTY 7 `1 I AKE SONOMA LAKE KGs X92 1 ESERVOIR— SONOMA C7 WATER SUPPLY POOL 212,000 A.F. �� ,` �•:.; FLOOD CONTROL POOL 130,000 A.F. . MINIMUM POOL 13,000 A.F.COVIN5 y SILT STORAGE 26,000 A.F. < �L LAK NTY TOTAL 381,000 A.F. DAM SPR/NGS ( NAP = +' ARM SPRINGS DAM - HEIGHT 319 FT. ! LENGTH 3,000 FT. HEALDSBURG 1 TOP ELEVATION 519 FT. y SPILLWAY ELEVATION 495 FT. TOP OF WATER SUPPLY POOL 459 FT. WINDSOR GUERNEVILLE�� SANTA FORESTVILLE U� SEBASTOPOL ROHNERTVALL Y OF BODEGA PARK ON o BAY R v 9 �o 90 MIRABEL FORESTVILLE HWY 116 WOHLER PETALUm-'.., rl&lt r LEGEND WWRIIIIIIIIII` STREAM CHANNELS USED FOR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINES 00000 NORTH MARIN TRANSMISSION PIPELINE 13 COLLECTORS (PUMPING PLANTS) WELLS BOOSTER STATIONS STORAGE TANKS EMERGENCY WELLS 4. SCWA CONTRACTOR SERVICE AREAS GENERAL LOCATION MAP PREPARED BY THE MOTOR HOUSING ACCESS LADDER CONCRETE CAISSON RUSSIAN RIVER WATER SURFACE PUMP DISCHARGE LINE ' •'NATURAL FILTER DEEP WELL TURBINE PUMPS ..,-PERFORATED LATERAL INTAKE PIPES 1— , SAN FRANCISCO BA Y rC SAN FRANCISCO SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY 2150 WEST COLLEGE AVENUE SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 1998 Russian River Fhe Russian River originates in central Mendocino County. t drains 1,485 square miles and reaches the Pacific Dcean at Jenner, 20 miles west of Santa Rosa. Its main hannel is 110 miles long, with five main tributaries upstream from the Mirabel Collectors: the East Fork of the Russian River, Big Sulphur Creek, Mark West Creek, Maacama Creek, and Dry Creek. Lake Van Arsdale toEel River PAC I 1 C O1,u7n CE N Cape Horn l Po Va Dam 1'k i/aahh —IDT Coyote Dam tt, 01 - Racer.._ — RX A Mendocino Count — Sonoma County — Warm Springs DamDrYCre, lei Russian River System Storage Reservoirs Coyote Valley Dam: Located on the East Fork of the Russian River, this rolled earth embankment forms Lake Mendocino. Lake Mendocino: This U.S. Army Corps of Engineers project began storing water in 1959. It captures a drainage area of about 105 square miles, and provides a water supply pool of 70,000 acre-feet. Warm Springs Dam: Located about 14 miles northwest of Healdsburg, this rolled earth embankment dam forms Lake Sonoma. Three major reservoirs provide water storage for the Russian River Basin: Lake Mendocino on the East Fork of the Russian River; Lake Sonoma on Dry Creek; and Lake Pillsbury on the Eel River, which connects to the Russian River via an inter -watershed tunnel. Lake Mendocino and Lake Sonoma provide water for agriculture, municipal and industrial uses, in addition to maintaining the minimum stream flows required by Agency water rights permits. These minimum streamflows provide recreation and fish passage for salmon and steelhead. Water Transmission System Storage Reservoirs Scott Dam: This concrete gravity dam on the Eel River captures a drainage area of 298 square miles and forms Lake Pillsbury. Lake Pillsbury: An important water supply for the Russian River, Lake Pillsbury has a storage capacity of 86,388 acre-feet. Since 1921 the lake has supplied water from the Eel River by way of a tunnel constructed through a mountain ridge to the Russian River. Lake Sonoma: Located at the confluence of Warm Springs Creek and Dry Creek, this lake began storing water in 1984 and has a capacity of 381,000 acre-feet. Sonoma Booster Station No.2 Inflatable rubber dam: The rubber dam is raised in the spring when potable water demand increases. The dam raises the water level and creates a small lake from which to draw water into the off -stream infiltration ponds. Permanent fish ladders provide fish passage when the dam is raised. Well Field: As a stand-by water source, five wells have been added near the Mirabel collectors, providing an additional 20 mgd (million gallons per day) of pumping and diversion capacity. Chlorination facilities: The natural water entering the collectors is extremely clean; however, chlorine is added as a precaution against possible contamination in the distribution system. A home swimming pool contains about 1 to 3 parts per million; in comparison, the chlorine content in the Agency water supply is about 6/10 of a part per million at the infection point and about 2/10 of a part per million at the far end of the distribution line. Eldridge Sonoma Reservoirs Reservoirs No.1 & 2 No.1 & 2 Sonoma e/% Santa Rosa Booster StationCt No.1 �4tft�,M� Wohler Annadel Glen Ellen pumping • •� Reservoir No.1 plant �� Ralphlne S�Rosa QQJ Rese.1-4 rvoir i� No Inflatable Dam Reservoirs No. 1 o.1 & 2 Forestville Booster Station Forestville Emergency Wells River Management System Mirabel & Wohler Collectors: The Agency has constructed five collector wells adjacent to the Russian River—two collectors at Wohler Road and three collectors at Mirabel Park. Water is extracted from the deep gravel underflow of the Russian River by each collector. A typical collector has a 13 -foot diameter concrete caisson (pipe) extendingg 50 to 60 feet below the surface of the natural streambed. Perforated pi es (horizontal wells) extend radially from the bottom of each caisson into the aquifer. Each collector well houses two large electric pumps. Infiltration ponds: In the summers, algae can plug the riverbed and cause a reduction in the water reaching the gravel underflow. Cleansing winter floods restore infiltration in the riverbed, but during late summer and late fall it is necessary to augment infiltration by diverting water to infiltration ponds. Fish -screening facilities ensure that fish are not diverted from the river into the infiltration ponds. Booster 'Station Aqueduct Transmission System The aqueduct system consists of tanks, pipelines and emergency wells and is designed to carrythe anticipated (average) daily demand. Maximum demand occurs during July or August, at this time excess demand is met by storage tanks. Tanks: Sixteen steel storage tanks placed throughout the transmission system store 108.8 million gallons. Pipelines: The Agency has about 79 miles of underground pipeline extending from the Russian River to Santa Rosa, Cotati, Petaluma and Sonoma. The pipes range in size from 16 inches to 48 inches in diameter. Emergency wells: Three wells are capable of providing about 2 million gallons per day, and were constructed in 1977 in response to drought conditions. Sonoma Valley Treatment Plant The Treatment Plant provides secondary treatment of wastewater through a system of aeration basins, sedimentation basins, solids processing units, chlorination facilities and dechlorination facilities. Effluent enters the District's Wastewater Reclamation Facility for reuse. Valley of t14 Moon Water Sonoma District EI Verano Puap n u Starape Treelmenl oe ■■ Inipe[bn Rohnert Park Co'KtO- SonomaVatleyCourttySa ftatiIsWct Cotatl EI Petaluma s etlonism - go �a�d Water District The Reclamation Kastania Sebastopol Cotatl Reservoirs Early Warning System: To safeguard the water supply, three Early Warning System Stations(EWS) have been added in the Russian River watershed upstream from the collectors at Wohler and Mirabel. Equipment continuously monitors water quality to detect contamination before water enters the distribution system. pH Adjustment/Corrosion Control System: The Russian River water has a natural pH of about 7.1 - 7.6. To reduce lead and copper corrosion present in indoor plumbing fixtures, it is desirable to raise the pH of the river water to 8.3-8.5. TheAgency responded by constructing two pH Adjustment/Corrosion Control facilities, located at the Wohlerpumping plant and chlorination facility, where sodium hydroxide is added to the water supply. This treatment helps reduce dissolved metal content in reclaimed water as well. I Novato Facility is a Kastania system of Pump i — storage reservoirs Station �and distribution lines � that connect to privately owned irrigation systems, transmission lines and pumping stations. These allow for the reuse of reclaimed wastewater to irrigate pasture lands and vineyards. Some of the reclaimed water is also used to enhance wetland and wildlife habitats. Flood Control The Agency maintains over 300 miles of creek channels. Thousands of native trees and shrubs have been planted along channel banks with the help of Sonoma County Releaf and local school children to mitigate vegetation lost due to channel clearing and construction. Emergency Plan The Agency provides water supply and pressure for fire fighting and other emergencies from minor accidents to ma or disasters. Contingency plans are in place for specific events such as flood, earthquake or electrical power failure. J The Sonoma County Water Agency is responsible for providing a safe and reliable water supply to its customers. The public entrusts the = Agency to provide high- Y quality water for drinking and domestic purposes, industrial and agricultural uses, firefighting, and emergencies. Water quality monitoring and laboratory testing provide assurance that the water delivered to our communities is safe. The Agency consistently meets state and national standards for drinking water quality; also, it maintains 300 miles of flood control channels and natural waterways, assisting to protect lives, homes, property, and the environment during floods. The Agency's ' high standard for water quality and its flood control preparedness o ensure health and safety for ho generations to come �J J As the demand for water has grown in California, concern for conservation has increased. The Sonoma County Water Agency's Water Conservation Program is an integral part of water supply planning. The Agency shares the California State OnWater Resource Control Board's commitment to conserve water by sponsoring incentive programs for plumbing efficiency (ultra -low - flush toilets, low -flow showerheads and faucet aerators), landscape irrigation auditing and incentive programs for large -turf areas, water system leak detection, and urban and non -urban reuse. Water is conserved and waterways are protected by recycling water to irrigate parks, vineyards and crops. U u J From design engineers to environmental specialists to construction inspectors, the Sonoma County Water Agency's staff works cooperatively with other agencies in locating, designing, and constructing environmentally sensitive projects that reduce impacts on fish, animals and plants. The Fisheries Enhancement Program gives the Agency the opportunity to work closely with local I- _q landowners to ensure high water quality and l improved habitat for fish , (such as steelhead trout and coho salmon) and wildlife species in and adjacent to local waterways. The Agency's environmental specialists and landscape architects prepare restoration and revegetation plans to improve habitat for fish and wildlife, and people too! o-_ The Sonoma County Water Agency believes in the importance of water education and its role in conserving and protecting the environment. The Agency's Water Education Program, available to all public and private schools in Sonoma and North Marin counties, is designed to help educators teach students the value of water as an important natural resource. The Education Program includes classroom presentations, student assemblies and teacher workshops, a biannual educational newsletter, a pilot -study outdoor laboratory, and partnership and collaboration with other organizations and interest groups for community projects. Through —. this partnership with schools, our youth become "nseR aware of how daily water -use habits affect the management of water and are encouraged to be responsible for future water resources. c 43 d �_ - Vicki Vidak-Martinez Mayor, December 1999 -. December 2000 MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN CITY General Plan Adopted (2 year process) completed • Approval of Ballot Measures N (UGB) & O (Art.XXXIV-Affordable Housing) • Expressway Bridge Widening - 4 lanes completed .& Phase 11 under construction (10 year process) • New Library approved - under construction • New City Hall approved. - under design • Completed agreements with all. Bargaining Units:: RPPOA; Public Safety Dispatchers; SEIU-Local 707 Maintenance; Confidential Unit; & Management Group • Completed Emergency Driveway at Dept. of Public Safety • Adopted Megan's Law (Map of Sex Offenders) City Procedures • Approval of A.G.Spanos 176 Unit Apartment Project (120 Golf Course Dr.) • Approval of Next Level Project (6050 & 6100 Commerce Blvd.) • Automated Citizens Information Services (ACIS). Program - Implemented • Citywide Net Working; & Web Site - Implemented • New Municipal Code Published w/ Web Site Access - Implemented • Approval of Electronic Management Data Svcs. (Bldg. Dept. initial project) *.Approved new Franchise Agreement with AT&T for Cable. TV Services • Approval of Energy Services Contract Agreement . •_Approval of Solid Waste Services Request for Proposals (RFPs) • Established Policy for Services on City Commissions/Committees/Boards • Approval of "The Vision" Teen Center Project • Dedications of New Play Equipment in City Parks: Civic Center Drive; Alicia Park; Burton Avenue.; & Benecia Park • Efforts toward Golf Course improvements *'Approved a Plan for Metering Residential Homes - over a five (5) year period • Recruited and hired a new Public Safety Director, Planning Director and Finance Director JDNfjhh:121200 Mayor's A000wHshments Year 2000 -e7 . I would like to extend congratulations to all of the candidates in this years election for running campaigns that did not need the benefit of last minute hit pieces, at least none that I am aware of. To the winners, I looked forward to at least -two more years of working with you on issues important to the residents of Rohnert Park, and there will be many such issues and some tough decisions that we will have to make. I wish nothing but the best of success for our new Mayor and his subordinate, I mean the Vice -Mayor, during the upcoming year. To our outgoing Mayor, thank you for your efforts during the last 12 months. We are fortunate to have a first rate staff working for the City of Rohnert Park. From top to bottom or bottom to top, they are the best. Ms. Strauss, thank you very much for your expert legal guidance. Mr. Netter, thank you for your leadership and please extend our "thanks and appreciation to all city employees through the newsletter if possible. Thank you to all the volunteers throughout the city and to those that give of their time to serve on the various commissions, committees and boards. Without their dedication we could not function. A special thanks to the youth representatives for keeping all of us informed and for their untiring efforts at making the "vision" a reality. Thank you too to the SSU student representatives for including us in their community. It is customary that the outgoing mayor will highlight accomplishments of the past year. It is also customary that.the incoming mayor presents a vision of what lies ahead. I will not bore you with my thoughts on the past year's accomplishments or the next years vision. And while all of us sitting up here may have a different vision of where we want to be or how we want to get there, the reality is we will have to work together, setting aside our differences with each other and with staff to accomplish what needs to be accomplished to make this city a better place to live. In 1996 that city council placed a temporary ugb on the ballot, promising to come to a consensus and place a long term ugb on this years ballot. That didn't exactly happen as originally proposed. Regardless we now have the overwhelming support of those that voted for the implementation measures. I look forward to working on goals of the new. general plan. In closing, I would like. to thank all of you who have supported me during the last 10 years. And saving the best and most important to me for last, I want to thank my family. Nick, Danielle and Sean, I look forward to watching you meet the challenges of adulthood. I am proud of all three of you. And to my wife, thank you for being my campaign manager, mother of our children, wife (soon to be 20, years) and best friend. I am very lucky. Happy holidays to all and, barring any dimpled or hanging chads, a successful and safe . new year. Dec 13 00 01:23p Bellevue USD 707 542 6127 p.4 Perspectives For 2001 I just love the sound of the number 2001. For me, it brings a vision of progress and technology. As a result of the November 7th election, our team will continue for another two years. Fiv ., dedicated Council members focused on improving the city is, perhaps, the best perspective. Major projects will include: I. Construction will begirt of the Library followed by the construction of City Hall. 2. The Council will select the parameters of our golf courses modernization projects and the. north courses will be closed in April as work begins. 3. We will devote much energy to economic development establish a long term plan for economic stability. 4. Our Rohnert Park Expressway Project will be completed and the impact on traffic flow will be dramatic. For many reasons, 2001 will be a good year. Dec 13 00 01:22p Bellevue USD 707 542 612"1 p.e- 1�..... ....... �► •• • - • Decemberill Refiections I have said many times to my fellow Council Members that this has been a great year. To be certain that I did not get too enthusiastic, they have told me that I am running for office again. However, in reflecting overthe past year, I have very much appreciated the friendship, wit, and dedication of the Council members. As a Council, we have completed and scheduled major projects that will enhance our city. The hundreds of hours that were necessaryfor the completion of the General Plan resulted in a profound 20 year document that formulates the basis of responsible growth and development. Vickie and Jake were'exceptionai in their commitment: Five months from now, the children will rejoice and enjoy M Pool. We went through an extensive period of evaluation and selected a plan that was diverse and affordable. Alsm improved this yearwere our new Library and City Hall, Both were absolutely necessary for stability and success of our city. We are in an ever-expanding technical world. Our children and our families need a state-ot-the-art library. We need to prepare our children for the world of computers, research, and the Internet. As a city, we have expanded services to residents. This has required new departments and new personnel. In order to be even more effective, they will appreciate being located N one facility. There, proximity and staff Interaction will promote efficiency and supportfor residents. Wien I reflect upon- our success, it has been a team effort This Includes all of our Gly , staff led by City Manager Joe Netter and the depart[TTent heads. A special thank you to: City Attorney Betsy Strauss City Engineer Joe Gaffney City Planners Nancy Kaufman and Ron Bendorf Director Of Public Works Bill Stephens Building Official Lee Braun Director Of Recreation Tim Barry Director Of Performing Arts Michael Grice Finance Director Sandy Lipitz Public. Safety DireotorJeff Miller Personnel Manager Pamala Robbins Dec.13 DO 01:23p Bellevue USD 707 542 6127 p.3 -2- Administrative Assistant Troy nPitling, Judy Hauff, Beth I-idster Our succe:3s is also shared with our many commission members. Theytoo have devoted many hours to improving our city. Iwouldalsoliketothankanothermemberoftheteam,-mywife-Eftabeth. Shehas,withonly an occasional expression of concern, supported my attendance at many meetings. I am grateful to her for her support and encouragement Thank you also to my District Office staff and friends who are hone tonight. You know how important you are to all my efforts. Reflections on 2000: Presentation to Out -going Mayor Vicki Vidak-Martinez. The events of this past year, truly the last year of the 20th Century, were prologue to the new century and the role of Rohnert Park in this part of the world . You can just look 'at the minutes of our last council meeting for a snapshot , a crystallized moment which reflects all the commitments all the pressures ,all the opportunities all of us on this council and all of us in this community have faced and with which we are trying to deal .Here's the laundry list! Holiday Lights Youth representative SSU student representative Rancho.Feliz after school program Financial reporting award Impact of telecom valley -Next level T's academy Second unit appeal-Councilmember Flores translates. Communications Ordinance Golf course Rotation of mayor Teen center joint use with SSU ABAG Housing #'s S Laguna watershed group Draft zoning ordinance -General Plan Transit Initiatives -Santa Clara /Alameda counties Code enforcement action plan. This council deals with these disparate problems. We work together, albeit with some dynamic tension. So despite some of the more outrageous gaffes in reporting locally or absolute lack of reporting in the case of the PD , now absent from most of our meetings , this past year saw us 1 complete our GP update, pass a 20year UGB and miracles of miracles we actually approved an affordable housing project -never built but never mind. We did of course avoid taking. advantage of an other opportunity with Mr Spanos to actually get some affordable units built on the infamous golf course drive site... whatever did happen to that urgency to build ?. I have for each of the past 3 years reflected upon the year left , in some cases thankfully, behind . At the end of this my e year for reflection, we ,on this council, collectively have demonstrated the truth of the hypothesis currently purveyed by political analysts and consultants -Incumbents Rule! It is to one of these incumbents that I now address these remarks- our outgoing Mayor Vicki Vidak-Martinez, a woman of fewer words than I. Perhaps this one last time Madam Mayor you'll . forgive my loquacity and accept my hopefully eloquent words. It was said, evidently of the son of of an English architect [Sir Christopher Wren], Si monumentum requiris, circumspice. Now this :inscription to be found in St Paul's Cathedral, London can be applied to that room in which we all or at least some of us find ourselves this evening. In particular it's a brighter world we sit in twice a month in the wee hours[ seems they are wee anyhow]. Madam mayor - I'm pleased to be the one congratulating you on a year well served! The likelihood of my doing this 3 years ago , at least with good grace, must have seemed remote and of course some would have hoped that it would not have happened at all.[ Go figure that out, Jud Snyder] . Demonization is a deplorable if very satisfying way of conducting local yes even national politics. And truth be told the mayor and I were each others' demons. But as I told Jim Ghilloti [ now there's a real demon] in a candidates' interview this September, despite the sheer fun of an adrenaline- charged political warfare, sooner or later and hopefully sooner the parties waging war need to call a truce and consider other means of settling contentious.issues. I believe you've done that successfully and with grace. Madam mayor - you have served the city well this past year. You have explored different ways 2 of doing things, You have certainly "fought our corner" fiercely when resource distribution came up in various contexts. The" Supes" certainly have been impressed by the vigor with which yuo've represented us on Tourism matters. While Central Sonoma County may -not make for a catchy acronym it does seem to be the `Bermuda Triangle" as far as many in this county are concerned when scarce resources are concerned. You've done well in representing our point of view as the third largest city in Sonoma county. You have been a worthy co-conspirator, if that's the word, in getting our General Plan passed and the complementary UGB measure on the ballot. Needless to say ,the committee for Yes on Measure N [ now there's an irony], represent the zenith of ecumenism in this community. Verily , verily-" The wolf shall also dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid, and the calf and the young lion... together. "- Enough you say and I would agree - you made it work and that has been recognized in the way most gratifying to us electeds -you were re-elected with the greatest # of votes. Mind you .as a Scot my cost per vote was a wee bit less than yours!. Congratulations on a job well done! 3 Perspective for 2001: Mayor Jake Mackenzie reflects on the year to come. As Nick Reilly likes me to say as your local braveheart-"Freedom ... freedom... freedom!" Of course it was another Scot ,Robert Burns who said "Freedom and whisky gang thegither". Maybe George W and Al should subscribe to the Burns approach to post-election nerves. Non sequitur or not, this is a grand time to gain some perspective of the political process in this country.. As I write this early today the Supremes still "keep [us] hangin' on"..more to come no doubt: I do want to take the time -sorry party animals but this is my time to perspect- to give thanks to many. Thanks to City staff ably led by Joe Netter and his management team and ably assisted by Troy Dettling, Judy Hauff, Beth Lidster and Ellen Beardsley .Thank you Betsy Strauss for being our wise counselor. Thanks to all the unsung folk on our staff who do the ' day to day work that keeps the city going. Thanks to all the volunteers who give their time so generously. I will thank you all individually during the year to come as I bike , walk and ride around our city. I would like to thank my appointees to commissions for their hard work -. indeed they are ` unhonour'd and unsung". Shawn Kilat has epitomized the standard I would like to see exhibited by commissioners. She stands up for her _own beliefs, she is indefatigable in her research and she asks questions of the "experts" based on that research and.these beliefs. The quality of the advice we receive from our commissions is directly related to the quality and quantity of the work done by those who advise us. I `ll miss her advice as my appointee to the Planning commission. I'm looking for a replacement ; folk with professional qualifications are encouraged to apply. 'Many friends and supporters, now my friends I hope,. walked precincts for me this fall. Some of you are here tonight - Thank you! There are 3 people I'd like to mention specifically- My son Gordon William Mackenzie and his partner Michelle McAvoy. Them first then my wife Barbara. Michelle McAvoyis my webmistress I'm not comfortable with the P.C. webperson. Gordon assisted her. The result was 1vmv. iakemackenzie. org , my very own site . It got rave reviews from my tech head buddies . Thank you both for all your hard work . I hope to persuade Michelle and Gordon to. transform it into a site where I can respond to those of you out there in space - cyber that is. In these interesting times we're condemned to live in ,new means of communication are to be fully utilized . The other woman I'd like to thank is sitting here tonight beside my mother-in-law. Four years ago Barbara Mackenzie managed my campaign , wrote my literature as she handles all of the tasks she undertakes -with skill., with exactitude, with passion, with integrity and with a great respect for and command of the English language .I represent the ultimate challenge to a manager such as Barbara- as I have to other managers I have known in my long and checkered career. She has continued to be my friend through these campaigns and travails .I love her dearly. Thank you, Barbara. Here in the Friendly City, we're about to embark on a new century and a whole new direction. The once maligned "Rodent Park", while still disparaged by less enlightened neighbours, is, as we all know a fine place to be in this year 2000. We've.sung the praises of our accomplishments and they are many and varied. Now we collectively need to examine the tasks ahead and they are many and varied. When I looked back at perspectives from past years, I was pleased enough. In June 1996, I laid out the following approach," By the year 2000 , a rational approach to establishment of an urban growth boundary , representing the `probable physical boundaries and service area' of our city can be crafted and voted on by all of us as part of [what became Measure N[ 1996 version]."It'gratifies me no end to find ourselves exactly where I said we would be in 2000. 'In the year 2001 -our goals are laid out in our Budget. This represents a major improvement from the past when there was no , or at least no expressed, strategic direction to the budget . These goals represent the beginning of a Strategic Plan for our City .We need to put this plan in place in 2001. General plan implementation. The big one! Ordinances , specific plan guidelines , Permanent green belt round the city and performance indicators to track our progress and adjust our path to success. We need to immediately examine the possibility of a jobs/housing/transportation impact fee approach in this community with the idea that it would be adopted county -wide. Economic development The "strategery", as SNL would have George W say, for ED needs to be developed and put in place this year. We need, to examine our Budget immediately in January 2001 to determine what restrictions we face and adjustments we need to make. This may not be much fun! Technical Innovation The strategy for IT must go into place and guide us in RP now that we have advanced from the beginner slopes -we're not ready for the fast runs quite yet but we need to look ahead . Community Health / Quality of Life Traffic summit -need to get the neighbourhoods together - this was on folks minds this fall. We need to develop the infrastructure - the Vision, the senior center and the teen Center. We need a skate, park in RP Me need more partnership projects with the schools and SSU. We need to deal with boundary issues with these partners. Services and Infrastructure Put the 5 year Capital Improvement plan in place .Garbage contract in place, water supply needs to be expanded , -start work on metering-asmy Uncle Paul 1 ' in Indiana would say-WOWWork,Work! . Our Downtown starts to take shape! What impact will SSU's new Info center and music center have on us here in RP? As you can see there's work enough for all - we need our best and brightest , young and old , - sorry senior, to join us in this work. As your mayor, I will practice what I have been preaching -Open government with citizen participation. My meeting schedule will be available at city hall and my meetings will be open. As your mayor, I will pursue campaign reform with full. disclosure. There is a need to reform our system. As your mayor, I will maintain a sense of humour and an open mind. The need to have fun is part of all of us; while we're striving to compete and survive in the year 2001 ,let's remember to have some fun. What better time to start than now. Let the revels begin! Page 3 of 3 t CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES for: CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION November 28, 2000 Tuesday The concurrent meetings of the City of Rohnert Park for the City Council and the Community Development Commission met this date in regular session for a regular meeting commencing at 7:28 p.m. in the City offices, ✓6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, with Mayor Vidak-Martinez presiding. CALL TO ORDER: - Mayor Vidak-Martinez called the, regular session to order at 7:28 p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: (5) Councilmembers Flores, Reilly and Spiro; Vice Mayor Mackenzie, and Mayor Vidak-Martinez Absent • ( 0 ) None Staff present for all or part of the meeting: City Manager Netter, City Attorney Strauss, Planning and Community Development Director Kaufman, Interim Assistant City Manager Stephens, Finance Director Lipitz, and Accountant/Auditor Raymond. 1. CLOSED SESSION: Mayor Vidak-Martinez reported on the closed session which commenced at approximately 6:00 p.m. to discuss matters listed on the agenda attachment, representing an update. 2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES - NOVEMBER 14, 2000: Upon MOTION by Councilmember Flores, seconded by Councilmember Reilly, the Minutes of November 14, 2000, were APPROVED 3-0 AS SUBMITTED, with Vice Mayor Mackenzie and Councilmember Spiro abstaining. City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES 'November 28, 2000 Page ( 2 ) 3. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS, IF ANY (INFORMATIONAL ONLY): Mayor Vidak-Martinez asked the Councilmembers if there were any informational communications to add to the agenda. *Mayor Vidak-Martinez reminded the community that the Holiday Lights Celebration will be held on Thursday, November 30th, from 6:00-7:30 p.m. at the Community Center. 4. YOUTH REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CITY COUNCIL FROM HIGH SCHOOL 2000-2001 YOUTH OF THE YEAR PROGRAM SELECTIONS: 1. Senior Harjit Banwait and Juniors Kaitlin Glass and Laura Lively were recognized. The youth reps shared the contents of the Youth Report DISTRIBUTED to Councilmembers. Highlights included the following: (1) A dance to honor the Exchange Students is in the works. (2) Pictures of the Exchange Students will be displayed in the front office at Rancho Cotate. (3) Championship football game Saturday, December 2nd, at Santa Rosa J.C. at 7:00 p.m. Vice Mayor Mackenzie REQUESTED a list of the names and the countries represented by the exchange students. 5. SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATED STUDENTS, INC., REPRESENTATIVE: 1. Seann Pridmore, ASU Vice President of University Affairs at SSU, was recognized. Highlights from the SSU Report included: (1) Copies of SSU's newspaper, The Star, were DISTRIBUTED to Council. (2) SSU back at the Inn of the Beginning, Thursday, December 7th. (3) Ad hoc committee formed to come up with an alternative name for the SSU mascot. (4) SSU Women's basketball vs. Holy Name College, Saturday, December 2nd, at SSU. *City Council/Community Development Commission Y. City of Rchnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES November 28, 2000 Page(3 ) 6. UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES: Mayor Vidak-Martinez stated that in compliance with State law (The Brown Act), citizens wishing to make a comment may do so at this time (limited to 3-5 minutes per appearance with a 30 -minute limit). 1. Lauri and Jennifer Heanue, 35 Madrigal Street, were recognized and thanked the Council for the monetary support provided for the Rancho Feliz After -School Program. Mrs. Heanue SUGGESTED opening up the program to all Rohnert Park schools. Jennifer shared her comments on the movies, cooking projects, and games that she and her brother enjoy in the program. They noted that there are about 30 students in the program which runs from approximately 3-6 p.m. after school. Vice Mayor Mackenzie REQUESTED that Jennifer's written comments, ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL MINUTES, be DISTRIBUTED to appropriate staff. 2. Al Barr, 5746 Dexter Circle, was recognized and ASKED for an update on his complaint about the back-up alarms from Hertz -Big 4, which he presented to Council at the October 24th meeting. City Manager Netter informed Mr. Barr that the City has met with Hertz - Big 4 to discuss the matter, and they are in the process of -conducting a survey and reviewing their use permit. The City Manager also indicated that they are trying to determine if the sounds are coming from Empire Tractor, and Mr. Barr urged the City to keep working on rectification of the noise problem. City Manager Netter noted that staff would be more informed by mid-December on the matter. ********************************************************** 7. CONSENT CALENDAR: Mayor Vidak-Martinez asked if there were any questions regarding the matters on the Consent Calendar, which were explained in the City Manager's Council Meeting Memo. The Mayor signified removal of one Consent Calendar item for further discussion as follows: Item D per Councilmember Reilly's recommendation. Acknowledging the City Manager/Clerk's report on the posting of the meeting's agenda *City Council/Community Development Commission A City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES November 28, 2000 Page(4 ) Approval of Bills/Demands for Payment concurrently for: *City of Rohnert Park/City Council in the amount of $1,946,626.47 *Community Development Commission in the amount of $37,938.35 Resolutions for Adoption: 2000-233 CALLING FOR SEALED PROPOSALS FOR ONE (1) MINI HALF -TON PICK-UP FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 2000-234 REJECTING THE CLAIM OF LOIS L. PATYK (RE: ALLEGED FALL AT SPRECKELS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER) Upon MOTION by Vice Mayor Mackenzie, seconded by Councilmember Flores, with the exception of Item D, the Consent Calendar as otherwise outlined on the meeting's agenda was,UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Item for consideration: Approval of donations of a Summer Family Pool Membership and a one-year individual Sports Center Membership for Rohnert Park Chamber of Commerce Auction, Annual Spring Business .Showcase, Thursday, May 10,.2001 Councilmember Reilly asked for clarification on this donation, and City Manager Netter responded with the amounts of $180 and $225 respectively. Upon MOTION by Councilmember Reilly, seconded by Vice Mayor Mackenzie, Item D was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 8. FINANCIAL REPORTING AWARDS: *Accepting "Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting" Award from the Government Finance Officers Association for the City' -s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1999 (18th consecutive year): City Manager Netter and Council presented Finance Director Lipitz with this award and thanked her and staff for their efforts. City Manager Netter noted that anyone interested in viewing this financial report can go to the Finance Department and check out a copy of it. *City Council/Community Development Commission City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES November 28, 2000 Page(5 ) *Presentation of the Award of Financial Reporting Achievement to George P. Raymond, Accountant/Auditor: City Manager Netter and Council presented Accountant/ Auditor Raymond with this award and thanked him for his efforts in -the Finance Department. 9. SKATING RINK RELOCATION TO SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD: 1. Staff report ori Financing Options for privately -owned skating rink: City Manager Netter shared the contents of the October 16th staff memo. Councilmember Spiro REQUESTED more information on the City of Cotati's financing of Oliver's Market. Vice Mayor Mackenzie ASKED Next Level Communications to come back to the Council with an innovative means of financing the relocation of Cal Skate. At this time, Mayor Vidak-Martinez called forward citizens who submitted speaker cards for this item: 1. Charles Kitchen, 4457 Hollingsworth Circle, was recognized and reiterated his suggestion made at an earlier Council meeting to pursue Next Level Communications for the funding of the relocation of Cal Skate. He briefly discussed his findings on certain financial matters related to Next Level. 2. Fred Garcia, 926 Hacienda Circle, was recognized and thanked the Council for its consideration in the possible relocation of Traditional Aikido of Sonoma County. He'discussed the benefits of Aikido.and PROPOSED a partnership between the Aikido members and supporters and the City to work with at -risk youth in the community. He SUBMITTED to the City Manager a petition signed by 130 residents who support Traditional Aikido of Sonoma County. Councilmember Spiro SUGGESTED contacting James Brown at Exchange Bank regarding a consortium of banks in Sonoma County that help fund organizations which provide services to low and moderate -income families in the community. 3. Buck Oates and Bob Cassanova, 320 Professional Center Drive, were recognized and thanked the Council for its efforts in trying to help Cal Skate fund its relocation. .They said that they will explore the possibilities in seeking funds through Next Level and the bank consortium. They discussed how Cal Skate, though privately owned, would enhance the Southwest area, and they ASKED that the City *City Council/Community Development Commission City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES November 28, 2000 Page (6 ) J continue to consider working with them on the financing aspect of the skating rink relocation. Council CONCURRED to take no action on this matter due to budgetary concerns. 10. T'S ACADEMY STATUS REPORT/EXTENSION REQUEST: Councilmember Reilly discussed his reasons for requesting an extension of the deadline date for Reverend Tharpe, noting the 5 -month delay in the letter of support from the City. FOR THE RECORD, Councilmember Reilly asked that the original vote of support for T's Academy be noted: Motion by Mackenzie, seconded by Spiro, unanimously approved, with directions for staff to proceed. Council discussion concluded, and upon MOTION by Councilmember Reilly, seconded by Councilmember Spiro, a motion to extend,the deadline for a status report from T's Academy from June 1st, 2001, to November 1st, 2001, was APPROVED 4-1 with Mayor Vidak-Martinez dissenting. 11. PLANNING AND ZONING MATTERS: 1. File No. 1902 - Consideration of Appeal of Jose L. Sanchez Use Permit for a Second Residential Unit at 7835 Burton Avenue: a. Staff Report: Planning and Community Development Director Kaufman shared the contents of the staff report and noted that a letter from Howard Stiefer, Jr., the northern neighbor of Mr. Sanchez, was received today and put in Council's packets. She and City Attorney Strauss then responded to Council inquiries. Councilmember Spiro REQUESTED that an ordinance be drafted outlining the requirements for additional parking for second units. b. PUBLIC HEARING: Mayor Vidak-Martinez OPENED the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. 1. Sandra Leatherwood, 7821 Burton Avenue, was recognized and voiced her opposition to Mr. Sanchez' application to construct a second unit on his property. She discussed current problems with parking, traffic, access to the backyard, drainage, and property value issues that have affected her adversely. She *City Council/Community Development Commission City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES November 28, 2000 Page(7 ) SUBMITTED to the City Manager a packet consisting of letters of opposition from neighbors to Mr. Sanchez, as well as a printout from the Sonoma County Assessor's Office regarding the property at issue. City Attorney Strauss indicated that she would look into the Vehicle Code to check for compliance regarding a PG&E vehicle parked in the area of Burton Avenue in question. 2. Michael R. Finale, 7815 Burton Avenue, was recognized and expressed his concern over the possible precedent being set by allowing a second unit to be constructed. He called into question the timing of the drive-by to check on the parking situation on Burton Avenue. He discussed the residual effects of allowing a secondary residence on Mr. Sanchez' property, namely the increased demand for parking. 3. Joe and Diana McMakan, 7847 Bernice Court, were recognized and expressed their opposition to Mr. Sanchez' application. They noted that in addition to living directly behind Mr. Sanchez, the backyards are small, and that a secondary residence would affect the quality of life they enjoy in— that neighborhood. They discussed the effects of "urban sprawl, specifically traffic, cost to government, crime, and accidents. They indicated that they moved from San Francisco to Rohnert Park to enjoy life in a single-family dwelling. Mr. McMakan also commented on the benefits of having profit -oriented recreation, such as Cal Skate, in the community. 4. Jose Sanchez, 7835 Burton Avenue, was recognized and REQUESTED the use of a Spanish translator due to his limited English. Through the translation of Councilmember Flores, Mr. Sanchez indicated that he could not understand his neighbors' opposition. 'He SUBMITTED photographs of the parking available on his property, as well as photographs of the neighbors', some of whom, he noted, have two or three cars and/or a trailer, in addition to having other individuals living in their homes with additional vehicles. He indicated that his interest in building the second unit is to have a place for his 18 -year-old son, and he noted that, in the interest of maintaining a good relationship with his neighbors, he would respect the decision of the Council. *City Council/Community Development Commission City of Rohnert Park November 28, 2000 There being no one further Mayor Vidak-Martinez CLOSED 9:00 P.M. *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES Page ( 8 ) desiring to speak on this item, the public hearing at c. Council discussion/action: City Attorney Strauss provided clarity on State law regarding second units. Resolution for consideration: 2000-235 DENYING AN APPEAL OF A USE PERMIT AND RESIDENTIAL PARKING EXEMPTION TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SECOND RESIDENTIAL UNIT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7835 BURTON AVENUE (JOSL L. SANCHEZ) Council discussion concluded, and upon MOTION by Vice Mayor Mackenzie, seconded by Councilmember Spiro, a motion was made to approve Resolution No. 2000-235 with the recommendation to the applicant to consider attaching the second unit to the existing dwelling, and with amended language as follows: "If the applicant chooses to attach the second unit to the main residence, the unit shall be no larger than 300 square feet, shall meet all applicable setback, height, and lot coverage limitations, shall satisfy all of the conditions listed above for this approval, and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Director." The motion was APPROVED 4-1 with Councilmember Flores dissenting. Councilmember Flores then translated the following action of the Council into Spanish for Mr.. Sanchez. 2. Communications Facilities Zoning Ordinance: a. Staff Report: Planning and Community Development Director Kaufman shared the contents of the staff report and responded to Council questions. b. Ordinance for introduction: No. 661 REPEALING MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.64, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES, AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 17.64, COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Upon MOTION by Councilmember Spiro, seconded by Vice Mayor Mackenzie, a motion to introduce Ordinance No,. 661 was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. *City Council/Community Development Commission N City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES November 28, 2000 Page ( 9 ) 12. GOLF COURSE MATTERS: 1. Results of 11/20/00 Special Meeting held for the purpose of considering alternatives presented by American Golf Corporation for golf course improvements or to consider other options: and 2. Staff update on progress of any options selected for consideration: City Manager Netter briefly recapped the Golf Course Special Meeting held on November 20, 2000. He talked about two option for upgrading the north and south courses, specifically the aspect of a signature golf course. He also commented on possible financing structures for such improvements and on the discussions around rate charges. At this time, Mayor Vidak-Martinez called forward citizens who submitted a speaker card for this item. 1. Robin Bleckwehl, 5000 Roberts Lake Road, was recognized and expressed her support for improvements to both golf courses as an excellent means for economic development. She discussed how a first-class destination golf course could be added to a travel package that would include the newly renovated Doubletree Hotel and the Wine Center/ California Welcome Center. She'also noted American Golf's commitment to the community via various fundraisers, and she encouraged the City to forge a new relationship with them. 2. Charles Kitchen, 4457 Hollingsworth Circle, was recognized and encouraged the Council to shorten and tighten the contract with American Golf to five years. He expressed his feeling that American Golf is solely responsible for the poor condition of both courses, and he suggested 18 workers need to be working the course. He read an excerpt about American Golf's previous handling of a golf course in Miami. 3. Barrymore Ivers, 5753 Davis Circle, was recognized and talked about how signature golf courses don't always provide a good return on investment. He suggested more investigation into that option. He indicated that there should be more accountability and tighter controls in any new contract with American Golf, and he discussed the problem with the sale of buckets of balls as an example. He also *City Council/Community Development Commission City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES November 28, 2000 Page(10) j suggested that an efficient maintenance plan be drafted for the improved courses. 4. Jim Cronin, Alma Avenue, was recognized and indicated that he was speaking as a resident and a golfer. He noted his support for the $5.3 million option and suggested starting with the south course. He expressed his problems with the proposed rate structure, and he SUGGESTED the formation of a small, ongoing oversight committee made up of representatives from the City, American Golf; the golf reps, and residents. He also SUGGESTED putting a preventative maintenance program in place so as to reestablish and maintain the images of the newly improved courses. 5. Ray Regnault, 4406 Hedge Court, was recognized and noted that he was a 20 -year golfer and 16 -year resident. He. expressed his support for higher green fees as a means of raising funds to improve the courses. He discussed the problems with signature courses,.and he SUGGESTED hiring local architect Fred Bliss to design the north course and then using the extra money to improve the clubhouse. Furthermore, he SUGGESTED following the City of Fairfield's example in leasing out their City - owned clubhouse at night to Legends & Heroes Sports Bars, which could generate more income for the City and the golf courses. Council discussion concluded with Council CONCURRENCE to direct staff to come back in a timely manner with proposals from at least two. professional firms which would outline specific costs and details of improvements for both courses. EXTEND COUNCIL MEETING: Upon MOTION by Councilmember Flores, seconded by Vice Mayor Mackenzie, a motion to extend the meeting past 10:00 p.m. to finish necessary agenda items was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED at approximately 9:55 p.m. RECESS: Mayor Vidak-Martinez declared a recess at approximately 9:55 p.m. RECONVENE: Mayor Vidak-Martinez reconvened the Council at approximately 10:09 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. *City Council/Community Development Commission City of Rohnert .Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES November 28, 2000 Page (11) 13. SELECTION OF CITY COUNCIL OFFICERS FOR 2001: 1. Selection of,Mayor: Upon MOTION by Councilmember Spiro, seconded by Mayor Vidak-Martinez, a motion'to select Vice Mayor Mackenzie to serve as Mayor was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 2. Selection of Mayor Pro Tempore (Vice Mayor): Upon MOTION by Vice Mayor Mackenzie, seconded by Mayor Vidak-Martinez, a motion to select Councilmember Flores to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore (Vice Mayor) was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 14. POSSIBLE PARTNERSHIP WITH STUDENTS: 1. Consideration of new Teen Center -joint use by Rohnert Park Teens and Sonoma State University Students: City Manager Netter briefly recapped the contents of the staff. reports provided to Council from Recreation Director Barry. Mayor Vidak-Martinez called Seann Pridmore, A.S.U. student rep from Sonoma State University, and Mr. Pridmore commented that in his discussions with the Teen Center youth representatives, they indicated to him great enthusiasm in attending occasional A.S.U. events that would be held at. the Teen Center. 2. Council discussion/direction/action: Upon MOTION by Councilmember Reilly, seconded by Councilmember Spiro, a motion to direct staff, to work with SSU students and youth reps to formulate a plan for the joint use of the Teen Center, was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 15. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND/OR OTHER REPORTS: 1. Report on Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Executive Board Meeting: Mayor Vidak-Martinez reported that she conveyed the information about Rohnert Park's housing unit allocations into the record, and that the City was encouraged to appeal ABAG's decision on the final allocations within 30 days. City Manager Netter noted that the City Attorney is drafting an appeal, and he directed Council to the November 17th memo from ABAG. Upon MOTION by Councilmember Reilly, seconded by Councilmember Flores, a motion to proceed with the appeal to ABAG was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. *City Council/Community Development Commission City of Rohnert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES November 28, 2000 Page(12) 2. Other: South Laguna Watershed Group: Mayor Vidak- Martinez and Vice Mayor Mackenzie reported on the extensive community effort put into the planting of 4000 trees along Copeland Creek at the beginning of November. Vice Mayor Mackenzie noted that the City would like to eventually,accurately map the drainage areas around Rohnert Park. 16. COMMUNICATIONS: Communications per the attached outline were brought to the attention of the City Council. *City.Manager Netter directed Council to No. 11: "N. Kaufman/Planning Director: Alternative Proposals for Public Review of Draft Zoning Ordinance." He noted that the recommendation is to use the Planning Commission with a Council liaison to set up a public process for the Zoning Ordinance changes. Council CONCURRED TO AGENDIZE this matter for the next Council meeting. 17. MATTERS FROM/FOR COUNCIL: 1. Senior Center Expansion Request: At the suggestion of Councilmember Spiro, Council CONCURRED TO AGENDIZE this matter for a January Council meeting. 2. Park Benches and Containers for Pet Poop: Councilmember Spiro stated that she has received. written and verbal communications about the need for benches and poop containers in certain areas of the City. Council CONCURRED TO AGENDIZE this matter for a January Council meeting. 3. Appointment procedures/City and Regional: At the request of Councilmember Spiro, Council CONCURRED TO AGENDIZE the matter of regional appointments for a January Council meeting. 4. Review of Santa Clara Valley 1/2 -cent Transit Sales Tax and Alameda 1/2 -cent Transportation Sales Tax Ballot Measures: At the suggestion of Councilmember Reilly, Council CONCURRED TO AGENDIZE a discussion of these various transportation sales taxes for a January Council meeting. *City Council/Community Development Commission C) 0 City of Rohriert Park *CONCURRENT MEETINGS MINUTES November 28, 2000 Page(13) 5. Concurrence for Cancellation of December 26th City Council meeting due to holiday: Council CONCURRED to cancel the Council meeting scheduled f -or Tuesday, December 26th, due to the holiday. 18. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: 1. Code Enforcement Action Plan: For informational purposes, City Manager Netter referred Council to the Code Enforcement Program timeline as outlined in the staff report provided to the Councilmembers. City Attorney Strauss acknowledged the extensive amount. of work which Building Official Braun has put into this code program. 19. OTHER UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES: At this time, Mayor Vidak-Martinez called forward any citizens wishing to speak. No one responded. There being no further business, Mayor Vidak-Martinez ADJOURNED the meeting at approximately 10:27 p.m. A��-e D Katy Leonard, Certified Shorthand Reporter CSR No. 11599 Vicki Vidak-Martinez, Mayor City of Rohnert Park *City Council/Community Development Commission I -CITY OF ROHNERT PARK BILLS FOR APPROVAL (Revised) December 12, 2000 Hand Check Numbers 111597-111606 Dated November 21, 2000 Dental Check Numbers 111607-111638 Dated November 22, 2000 Hand Check Numbers 111639-111640 Dated November 27-28, 2000 Computer Check Numbers 111-641-111834 Dated November 30, 2000 Hand Check Numbers 11183 5-11183 7 Dated December 1-4, 2000 ' Computer Check Numbers 111838-111979 Dated November 8, 2000 Action Plumbing $35,934.25 $10,597.14 $28,192.39 $182,367.38 $13,123.23 $204,290.36 Subtotal $474,504.75 Project No. 1997-6 Toilet Replacement Program $4,659.15 Ghilotti Brothers Construction Project No. 1991-04 RPX UC Improvements $131,543.18 CG Builders Project No. 1999-09 Magnolia Park Pool $54,777.78 Pipeline Excavators Project No. 2000-01 Civic Center, Area Improvements $19,305.00 Robert J. Endres Release of Landscape Deposit - Big 5 Sporting Goods $10,000.00 Subtotal $220,285.11 TOTALI $694,789.86 S CITY OF ROHNERT PARK BILLS FOR APPROVAL December 12, 2000 Hand Check Numbers 111597-111606 Dated November 21, 2000 $35,934.25 Dental Check Numbers 111607-111638 Dated November 22, 2000 $10,597.14 Hand Check Numbers 111639-111640 Dated November 27-28, 2000 $28,192.39 Computer Check Numbers 111-641-111834 $182,367.38 Dated November 30, 2000 Hand Check Numbers 111835-111837 Dated December 1-4, 2000 $13,123.23 Computer Check Numbers 111838-111979 Dated November 8, 2000 $204,290.36 Total $474,504.75 ID VALUE S3FA3401 10:07 CHECK # VENDOR #/NAME CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DEMAND LIST DEMAND DATE 11/22/2000 CHECK TOTAL 111611 09325 JOSEPH G. *AYMAR, D.D.S. 65.00 111612 09456 PERRY J. *BINGHAM DDE INC. 142.00 111613 ! 06556 MICHAEL J. *BIRD, D.D.S. 54.00 111614 09334 DOUGLAS *CHASE D.D.S. 291.00 111615 09336 RONALD E. *COX D.D.S. 495.20 111616 09337 CRAIG H. *DAVIS, DDS, MSD 1,121.40 111617 12094 KELLY A. *ELWARD, DDS 192.50 111615 09343 WALTRAUT *GRAD, DDS PROF.COR. 955.20 111619 09345 LAWRENCE D. *HENIG, D.D.S.INC. 1,530..00 111620 04502 JAMES T. *HENLEY, D.D.S. 609.00 111621 09346 GEORGE G. *HENLEY, DDS 439.60 111622 09648 FRANK *HODGES, DDS 119.00 111623 09578 ROBERT P. *JEFFERS, D.D.S. 323.20 111624 09348 MARK S. *KRONCKE_, D.D.S. 613.00 111625 01450 TERESA *MAZZANTI 64.50 111626 10790 JEFFREY B. *MCATEE DMD PC 95.00 111627 10676 MARK *NIZIBIAN, D.D.S. 69.60 111628 10791 JUSTIN D. *PHILLIPS, DDS 98.14 111629 09416 GERONIMO *ROMERO, DDS 139.00 111.630 09356 DR. JON K. *SCARR,ORAL SURGEON 96.00 _ 111631 11760 WAYNE *SUTTON, DDS 580.40 111632 09362 DAVID J. *TERRIBILINI, DDS 256.00 111633 09365 ROBERT D *TRADEWELL DDS 92.00 111634 10965 CHARLES K. *WEAR, DDS 610.50 111635 09782 CLINTON E. *WEAVER, D.D.S. 55.00 111636 09651 DAVID A. *WHEELER, DDS 150.00 111637 09367 CRAIG *WILSON, D.D.S. 95.00 111638 12095 JOHN S. *WOO, DDS 1,215.00 __ Total Demand: 10,5`97.14 40B ID VALUE S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK fIME 08:12 DEMAND LIST DEMAND D Al'ET-1-173-Q 1-2-0-0� -CHECK-#------- -------VENDOR--#7NAME CHECK-T-OTAL 111597 09068 CA APPLICANT EXPEDITE SVC 126.00 111598 10717 AFLAC 653.82 1-1-1-5 9 9-- -- --- 0-65 9 2---- ACTOR-'-S-E"C1U'I-T Y A S-S-UC7"A-T"i0-N E2 .•2-0 111600 00364 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTL. UNION 755.70 111601 09514 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES, INC. 200.35 1-1-1-6-0-2 - --0-0-324F R-EDWO-O-D-CR'ED-IT-Ut4- 7-,8-6S--.-59 111603 00323 UNITED WAY 193.50 111604 12064 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION 1,295.19 1-1-1-6-0 5----- _-12-0-G 3-------NAT-I-O NAL D E F ER R ED -COM P -EN SAT -I -O N 4, 78-67. T6 111606 08061 WASHINGTON STATE 35.54 111639 02591 CA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 25,150.27 1-17-6�F0- -0-0-385 CA-PUBLI-C-EMP-LOYEE� 3-;7T42-.1-2 111645 00245 101 INTERNATIONAL, INC. 41.12 111646 12059 ADAMS SURFACING 100.00 1-1-1-6-47 --- -1-051-3--- ALLEMAND-E'LE"C7R-I-C-SUPPL-Y 1-0-27.1-3 111648 07208 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC. 102.05 111649 07409 AMERICAN BRISTOL INDUSTRIES 850.53 1-1-1-G 5-0- "- 0-9 7 4-1 A M E R -I -CAN -SP -EC -I A CTY-HEALTH-P-LAN 1T1-3-1 111651 00016 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN: 114.00 11165E 10635 ANIMAL CARE TRAINING PROGRAM 134.10 1-1-1-653-----0334 UPiT-I-C`C-OMMER-C"IAL-TNDU`STR-I-E-S i-2 . Q0 111654 07501 ARDEN INDUSTRIES 647.20 111655 10644 PAULA C. *ASMUS O.D. 370.00 -1-1-1-657 0 -G0 -8 -& AT & T �F B ice, 111658 06401 AT&T 3.74 111659 12048 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICE 2,272.73 1-1-i-GG0 - --`--09'1-9-0 BAECHTEL HUD-rS-I-N-C-C-0N-SUL=N i , 1-T7`50 111661 00019 JAMES *BAKER.' 309.93 111662 11501 JILL *BARRETT 88.00 1 -1 -1 -GG 3 0-0-0-39 BAY A R E-A BA R R-rCA-D-E--ZE"I-C 483-7 111664 00695 BB&T, INC. 930.99 111665 12085 BEST SOFTWARE INC 483.75 -1-1-l-&G-G--0-4-9-1-G--CAND-XCE-WB-I-R-CHF-I-ELD 57.99 111667 09736 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA 45,580.12 111668 05533 GEORGE *BRANNEN, CSO 119.79 -1-1 4-0-9-- P E TER -K .* B R U'C K 111670 09288 BUDDIES PIZZA 210.16 111671 00929 THOMAS *BULLARD 31.63` -1-1-1-672--------0236-4---BUTLER-'-S-UN-1-FORMS -8 ,C-. 2 111673 10885 C. SPECIALITIES INC 280.50 111674 06226 CA ASSO OF HOSTAGE 35.00 1-1-1-675 0-9-3-1-9 Ci4-`CONSUMER AFF -KI -R8 -DEP -T 4-0-0-0 111676 09592 CA HIGHWAY PATROL 518.94 111677 12101 ANTHONY *CAETANO 400.00 -1-1-1-678- - 0 -9725 --RACHEL *-CARE 3-0-0-0-0 111679 03476 DAWN *CERINI 66.40 111680 11418 PEGGY *CHMIELEWSKI 226.00 -1-1-1-68-1- 1-2-0 9 2 ---TERRY-- CLARK X0-0 111682 06366 NANETTE *COATS 2.50.00 111683 00109 COGGINS FENCE & SUPPLY, INC. 35.00 )B ID VALUE S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK IME 08:1P DEMAND LIST FM A N g DATE -1 -f7 -T012 0- CHE-CK-#-- --VEND-OR-#/NAME CHE_CK-TOTAL 111684 00117 CITY OF *COTATI 150.00 1.11685 11283 CROCKER NETWORKING SOLUTIONS 99.00 1 -1-0'8-9 8 C UM M -I -N S -W E ST 2747.38 111687 10421 DATAMATIC.COM LTD 72.05 111688 09422 GREG *DAVIS 65.00 -1-1-&819- 1-1-2 2-0- DELL F -I -N A N C -I AL SER-►-I-CE-,,3 174-1-2. 9 111690 03993 DIVERSIFIED RISK 896.96 111691 08758 KAJIRA *DJOUMAHNA 41.60 1-1-1-6-92 1-1-288 GERALD-I-NE-*-DUN-C-ANN GS70-0 111693 00138 E&M ELECTRIC & MACHINERY, INC. 1,479.90 111694 11120 EMPIRE EYE DOCTORS 127.50 -1-1-1-&95 07 42-1 E Q U -I -T Y -LEAGUE 6-03-9-0 111696 08436 EVAN JOHNSON PHOTOGRAPHY 314.00 111697 08064 MICHELLE *FAHY 390.00 -1-1-1-&9 1-20-8-6-- FALCON A S S O -I -C -A T E S -TN 9-0-`0 0 111699 02450 CHRISTOPHER J. *FEAHR O.D. 113.00 111700 00157 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION• 380.02 -1-1-1-7-0-1- 1-2-0-1'5 F I -RS -T FL i GHT 138.75 111702 03497 FISHMAN'SUPPLY COMPANY 57.95 111703 11913 FURNITURE 101 2,800.00 1-1-17-0-4 1-1-4-65 -PA-MELA *GAFFFNEY -305-0-0 111705 12097 GEOLINE POSITIONING SYSTEMS 14.00 111706 10017 GIBLIN ASSOCIATES 132.00 --l-1-1-7-0-7-- -- --07357-- GOLDfN-PAC-IFIC II -NC . - -3-4-97-27 111708 04043 MARSHALL *GOLDY 80.00 111709 01624 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS 415.00 1-1-i 7-1-1----- 0-0-173- -GR-A-I-NGER ; I -NC '1 r 1-3-6 -.-t8 111712 08444 GROENIGER & COMPANY 505.25 111713 12106 APRIL *HAINES 70.00 1-117-14 ----0957-4 HANSEL-LEAS-IN E9-42 111715 10583 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL 429.81 111716 12109 HIGHLIGHTS FOR CHRISTMAS 26.04 1-1--17-1 7 - -=-03532- T -HE -*H -I -T -MEN TERMITE-&-FEST 634-0-0 111718 05227 HOLIDAY INN 271.83 111719 06854 HOME DEPOT 423.96 -----0-0-1-8 9 -B E -T -T -Y3 -A N E-* H O -T -A -L -I -N X 7 3 7-8-0 111721 03285 NSC ELECTRONIC SUPPLY 12.75 111722 12099 I.E. COMMUNICATIONS 50.00 -1-1-1-7-23--- ---- 1 1-973-- I-MAGEWARE-S-Y-S-T-EMS-INC 4270-3-t -3-0 111724 00198 INT'L CITY/COUNTY MANAGEMENT 904.14 111725 00195 INT'L CONFERENCE OF BUILDING 158.03 1-1172-6 0-24-22 IN-T-ERNAL REVENUE -S- R -VICE 132..7-9 111727 10337 IOS CAPITAL 270.90 111728 07553 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 4.09 -1-1-1-7-2-9 -1-0-9 3-6--- ,7ONE-S-&-MA DH-A-V-A-N 5025 111730 00533 KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY INC. 8.73 111731 05206 L & M DISTRIBUTION, INC. 42.66 1-1-1732 04-6-87 L -C A-C-T-ION-POL-I-C�St1PPtY 1-0-6-.9- 1 111733 01247 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 112.25 111734 03425 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 376.98 JOEL ID VALUE S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK MIME 08:12 DEMAND LIST D EMAN`D-D-ATE--rl / 3-0-/-2-0-0-0 CHECK # VENDOR --#/NAME HE-CKTOTAL 111735 12088 KAREN *LAMKE 13.34 111736 03631 LIFE FITNESS PRODUCTS, INC. 2,522.98 -11-1-7 ---08-49-8 SANDRA M -*LIP -I TZ 4 -6 .66 111738 03860 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION 12.28 111739 11561 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE 59.00 -1-1-1-7-4-0--0-9 5-7 2-- -LYNN-PEAVEY-COMP- NY 88-60 111741 09436 JOHN *MACKENZIE 327.00 111742 02573 MANLY GMC TRUCK 85.02 -1-1-1-7-4-3-- ---- 1 2-09-t KA -RE -N -*MANN -I -N 1-1-"-0- 1"11744 12096 KATHRYN *MARSHALL 362.50 111745 03102 MARY'S PIZZA SHACK 135.72 1-1-1-7-4-6--- ---0-144-o -TERE-S-A *MA-ZZANTI 377-87 111747 12008 MEDX CORPORATION 268.16 111748 11466 GAIL F. *MITCHELL 1,209.11 1-1-1-74g- -- ---02845 -MONfiANA-HA-WK INC 1-4G 1'7 111750 08025 NORCAL BUILDING MATERIALS 183.32 111751 05790 NORTHBAY VENDING WEST 185.15 1-1-1752--- --1-2089-- --NORTHERN--C-A-L-IFORN-IA BOHEM-I-A-N 3-20-.0-0- 1117S3 10215 NORTHERN VIDEO 122.14 111754 08499 OFFICE DEPOT 240.57 1-1-1755 -- --- ---1-1-91-4--- OPERATOR -CERT I -F I -CAT I -ON 3S-0-95-- 5-0:`95111756 111756 07080 OPPERMAN & SON, INC. 404.72 111757 09453 KRISTINA *OWENS 500.00 1-1-1 7 59--- 0 0 34-0 P -A -C -I -F -I -C -BELL 9-79-G 3 111760 10079 PACIFIC SUN 240.00 111761 12102 SUSAN *PERRY 50.00 --1-1-i-7 6-2- --_- -- ----0-4-6 8 8---- PETTY---C-A :S H 2-3-9. 6 111763 10259 PFIZER ANIMAL HEALTH 131.26 111764 05795 PITNEY BOWES PREPAID DEPT. 149.13 1-1-17-6-5- - -1-0-0-63- -POWER I-NDUST-RIES-I-NC. 9-09 111766 10986 POWER UP PRODUCTS 349.50 111767 00269 THE *PRESS DEMOCRAT 82.91 -1-1-1-7-6-8- - - 0374-1- PROMARK IN- . 4954 111769 00267 RADIO SHACK 55.86 111770 03696 GEORGE *RAYMOND 35.00 1-1-177-1- 0-67-73 RECORD-MANAGEMEN-T-SERV-ICES----- c -G55:25 111772 10670 RED WING SHOES 534.92 111773 00263 REDWOOD OIL COMPANY 978.62 -1-1-1-7-7-4-- - --0-051-1 -RELIABLE HARDWARE & STEEL C . 7-1-17 111775 10430 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 420.00 111776 12087 GENIE *ROBERTS 25.00 1-1-1779 02{;75 R0HNER-T-P-A-RK-AUT-O-PART1-7-21-3-.9 4 111780 00757 CITY OF *ROHNERT PARK 275.89 111781 06983 ROHNERT PARK OPTOMETRIC CENTER 512.00 -`1-1-17-8c - -06-494----- -- `R0HNERT-P-ARK TIRE AUTO-CNTR 727-9-1 111783 00337 ROHNERT PARK VETERINARY CLINIC 405.00 111784 12105 IRENE *ROWLEY 50.00 -1-1-1785 1-1783--- RWE DI -S -T -R -I -BU -ING 358-9- 111786 05958 DAVID *SALDANHA 140.00 111787 05209 SAMUEL FRENCH, INC. 12.26 -1B ID VALUE ME .08: 12 CHECK S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DEMAND LIST E{-A-ND-DATi E-1 1-73072 600--- -----VEND-OR-4r/NAME Q -----VEND-OR-# 1NAME C}iE-CK-TOTAL 111788 00303 SAN FRANCISCO NEWSPAPER AGENCY 22.00 111789 12090 CLAUDIA *SANCHEZ 400.00 --l-1-1-7-9-0---- -----0-029-9-- -SANTA RUS-A BL-UEPR-I-NT-SERVTCE 1-72 .3 111791 00064 SANTA ROSA CHEVROLET 297.91 111792 00297 SANTA ROSA FIRE EQUIP. INC. 178.73 JENNA *-SEDA 2-.7 111794 02360 SEE'S CANDIES 1,151.90 111795 01062 SHAMROCK MATERIALS, INC. 1,742.44 1-1-1-79-6 -OGG25------SHELL O -IL -COMPANY 5-3"0 111797 02228 PAUL *SHEPHERD 29.25 111798 11376 SHARON *SHNELL-HOBBS 404.30 1-1-1-799- 0-72-04 -SHUTTERBUG 47-8 111800 12060 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPL'IE`S 344.00 111801 00491 PAUL *SKANCHY 253.65 77-- -S 0-C 0 A UD -I TOR 971-42.30 111803 04045 SO CO FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION 431.00 111804 00687 SO CO RECORDER 425.00 1-1-1-8-0-5 ------0.0-3-1-7 _-"SO-CO-SHER-iF 7758-5-70-0 111806 12103 SONOMA COUNTY SOCCER LEAGUE 320.00 111807 04989 SONOMA INDEX TRIBUNE 182.00 1-1-1-8 0"8 -0 3-8 22- L I -NDA --wSP-I-R" -8-7. 4"0�- 111809 00281 PAMELA *STAFFORD 592.80 111810 08077 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 873.10 1-1-18"1-1 02ss9-0- 5UNSET-LI"NEN-SERVi-C 1-42 c 111812 01801 SYAR INDUSTRIES, INC; 287.42 111813 00567 WALTER *TADDEUCCI 326.65 1-1-i-814 --0-82-1-1 -TONY-*-T`AM 1�0-.-T0 111815 07405 TARGET STORES 168.88 111816 00381 TDS - TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYS 619.53 11 i`$1-7 01-3$4 JOHN *THOMP-SO 111518 09742 REBECCA *THOMPSON 150.00 111819 12108 TOWN AND COUNTRY LIMOUSINE SV 427.80 1-1-1-820- - -1-025-0---- MATTHEW WTOWN-SEND E9-87.-0 111821 11340 UNISOURCE 1,162.67 111822 07928 UNITED RENTALS 488.75 1-1-1-82 3-- 1-2-0 9 3 E L A D"I-A *-VAL-EN"C-I 111824 05305 VICTOR'MEDICAL COMPANY 22.23 111825 06449 VISION HEALTH OPTOMETRY CENTER 568.20 --1-1-1-826 ----0-8-0-G 1- WASH -I -NGT -ON -STATE 5-070-0 111827 00328 WESTERN FARM CENTER 348.55 111828 04632 WHEELER & ZAMARONI 80.63 i-1-1-829 -'--0835"1 tJti-I�1'LO"CK-� WE-i-IVBER�ER 5a 539 CO 111830 12104 JEFF *WILSON 70.00 111831 00308 XEROX CORPORATION 1,233.24 1-1-1-8 3 3------047 1-5- YAR D B -I -R D-'- 5-4-`7 8 111834 . 01139 Z.A.P. MANUFACTURING, INC. 184.74 Total Demand: 246,494.02 )B ID VALUE S3FA3401 -1_M E-1_3_:_3 7 _ CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DEMAND DATE 12/08/2000 CHECK # VENDOR #/NAME CHECK TOTAL 111835 08707 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 168.33 1-1_18_3-6 _090-68- CA-AP_P_LI_CAN_LEXP-EnITE 51 C -4-2-0_0 111837 003714 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 12,912.90 111842 02618 3T EQUIPMENT COMPANY 137.69 0 9 i_3 4 A C C_0 U N T EM. I ,_31_?_0 0 _ 111844 119614 ADECCO 552.00 1118145 12120 ADVOCACY RESOURCE CENTER 75.00 111_$_4.6 1_0.3 b_3 _ _A LF_H_A_E L-E_C T R_O_N_I S 1 2A__8_? 111847 11303 ALPHA INTERNET SYSTEMS 1,545.00 111848 06408 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 225.00 1i y 814 �J 0 9 4 9 3 R_I C_H.A RDS. * A_S_LO - D_. _7_0_0__0_0 111850 06401 AT&T 29.38 111851 120148 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICE 795.95 f --------------04477 WEN:DY .AAJDI S $14_._36 111853 05622 MARLENE *AUSTIN 3,596.15 111854 10938 AVID INC 969.77 1 i 1855 __-__06�B62 BAY ALARM CQMPA-NY 72,il-0 111856 11513 RON *BENDORFF 17.19 111857 10789 BEVERLY'S CRAFTS 46.13 ___072$7 60YS AND GIRLS GL_LI_B 30, 0_0_0 . 00 111859 10380 GABRIEL *BRENNER 450.00 111860 10$$5 C. SPECIALITIES INC 77.00 11.1861 _ _070-68__-__ CA ARGRICULJUR__A!._P430�UCi�O1� 75.00 111862 09258 ROBERT L. *CASSEL 118.00 11'1863 00099 CHEM -MARK DISH MACHINE SERVICE 64.50 111864 -0 01_0 a C H_E V R QN_RkT I 4 N:k- L 1 R AV_E L -CSR D 7, 9 0 9. 14 6 111866 02689 COSTCO WHOLESALE 2,233.78 111867 11404 RYAN *CRAMER 450.00 111869 11223 CROCKER NETWORKING SOLUTIONS 195.00 111870 12041 AIDA *CRUZ 97.75 1 1 1 871 -----12117 CASEY *DIS 10. 00 111872 09422 GREG *DAVIS 65.00 111$73 112$$ GERALDINE *DUNCANN 48.75 1 1 1874 -_ 0 01 �4�3 DUST -TAX SERV I CES I CSC . 78.75 111$75 11187 EARLY LEARNING INSTITUTE 2,140.00 111876 06923 LEWIS *EDSON 20.00 111877 __4.07265 FACE TO FACE 15 000.00 111878 12122 GERSHWIN HOTEL 823.00 111879 00639 THEODORE *GIESIGE 45.00 111880 02335 MARGOT *GODOLPHIN 160.00 111881 00173 GRAINGER, INC. 103.25 111882 03830 MICHAEL *GRICE 793.58 111$83 04658__ .TAMES *GRUNDMAN 564.99 111884 10991 TOR *HANSEN 300.00 111885 00003 MICHAEL *HARROW 50.00 111886 10878 HAWTHORN SUITES 790.00 111887 11772 ANNE *HENDERSON 159.37 111888 10583 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL 873.98 11.1889 ____ _ _03532- THE *HITMEN TERMITE & PEST 137.00 )B ID VALUE S3FA3401 CME 1-3-3 CHECK # CITY OF ROHNERT PARK --- RE M,9In I T5;T DEMAND DATE 12/08/2000 VENDOR #/NAME CHECK TOTAL 111890 05E27 HOLIDAY INN 271.83 OT 5- 71 111892 00185 WARREN K. *HOPKINS 572.48 111593 05341 AMANDA *HOUSEMAN 107.50 03288 HSC ELECTRONIC SUPPLY 13.29 111895 06175 MATTHEW *HUGHES 450.00 111896 07526 IMMECOR CORPORATION 405.00 11187 09221 ,7ACQiSEM11 FE�LCE COJPAJY i ,_UO_4 111898 11405 GRANT *JOHNSON 450.00 111599 11911 NANCY *KAUFMAN 31.93 111900 00533 KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY INC. 34.73 111901 08546 KEN *KENNEMER, MFC 760.00 111902 11988 KEY MUNICIPAL FINANCE 3,821.89 1 1 1 X43 _ ____04$1_$ THE *LAB 1U.25 111904 11406 TOM *LAVEZZOLI 450.00 111905 01166 MARGARET *LEINSTER 340.00 111906 12-123 MIRIAM *LINARES 400.00 111907 03860 LOCAL GOVERNMENT'COMMISSION 36.82 111908 10246 HOLLIE *MARTIN 400.00 111909 _ 09176 ERIC *MATZEN 450.00 111910 06367 MARY *MC DOUGALL 41.47 111911 121122 JOHN *METRAS 250.00 111912 12115 R.C. *MOXON 10.00 111913 002241 NORTH SAY COMMUNICATIONS 2.49 111914 03508 NORTH BAY CORPORATE HEALTH 135.<00 111915- 06561 NORTH BAY EYE ASSOC. 120.00 111916 05790 NORTHBAY VENDING WEST 50.40 111917 12089 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BOHEMIAN 222.00 111918 11407 SEAN *O'DONNELL 450.00 111919 12118 OAKWOOD APTS - MARINA DEL REY 3,935.79 111920 08499 OFFICE DEPOT 20.04 111922 04068 OLD ADOBE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 6,644..61 111925 00340 PACIFIC BELL 4,001.57 111926 002253 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 7,358.53 111927 10079 PACIFIC SUN 120.00 111928 01894 DELANE E. *PATTON 164.16 111929 00269 THE *PRESS DEMOCRAT 3,299.65 111930 00266 HOMER *RAIL 704.96 111931 03696 GEORGE *RAYMOND 9.58 111932 04905 REDWOOD LOCK 43.50 111933 00263 REDWOOD OIL COMPANY 564.17 111934 10430 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 3,410.00 111935 105G5 ERIC *ROBINSON 300.00 111936 012253 ROHNERT PARK ARTS ASSO 3.500 00 111937 02675 ROHNERT PARK AUTO PARTS 231.13 111935 00644 ROHNERT PARK CHAMBER OF 31125.00 111939 06983 ROHNERT PARK OPTOMETRIC CENTER 604.00 111940 05958 DAVID *SALDANHA 140.00 111941 08787 SAMUEL FRENCH 45.42 -111942 __ _ i ^21_21_ 8AM_FRAN-CI_SCQ-LYAIC�1�Ek�A 4, 500.00 )B ID VALUE S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK �M E 1_3_3 7 D E M-A�LD_L�S T DEMAND DATE 12/08/2000 CHECK # VENDOR #/NAME CHECK TOTAL 111943 07665 SANTA ROSA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 395.85 --i-l-1-9-4-4--- 01-6_7_8 B Q G E R S S C H -W -A -N -K E 3 Q0.00 111945 12114 MICHELLE *SELF 10.00 111946 01062 SHAMROCK MATERIALS, INC. 115.39 i i t SWT ---A-14 80 H E E H A NL S_ZRAXE_1-8-F, 111948 08699 SIERRA SPRINGS WATER COMPANY 47.96 111949 08700 SO CO EMERGENCY SERVICES 100.00 —1-1 S 0_C 0_QE E -C E_ OF C-0-M--"_i_I-S LQI15 1 Q (ZO 111951 12111 SO CO TOURISM COUNCIL 15,000.00 111952 07098 SO CO WINERIES ASSO 10,000.00 111953 061 95 SO CO YOQ-T 1-DE_VELQFMENT ASSfO 111954 09000 CARL *SOKOL 525.00 111955 04989 SONOMA INDEX TRIBUNE 26.40 1 i_i �J 5 6 1 01 4 0 s 0N--0 NLA-QPJ_0 -E TJ�Y QE N TE R 21 2-0 0 111957 00251 PAMELA *STAFFORD 4,936.75 111958 12116 GARY *STIPE 10.00 1 t t 9590751 7 SUE_+ STUBIEI_NE 2225 111960 09850 SUTTER MEA GTR. OF SANTA 'ROSA 601.80 111961 01797 ARTHUR *SWEENEY 1,150.00 1 1_i 962 09003 S�T_E-P_HEN—* T- H-R-UaH MESO 00 111963 11560 TICKETS.COM 302.08 111964 11340 UNISOURCE 46.60 111967 10492 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 10,812.66 111968 09733 VERIZON (AIRTOUCH) 1,181.11 111970 11707 VERTEX 100.00 111971 05305 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 56.95 1_1_1_9_7.2_ 0 G G 4 5TW_A T-E_M.AN.AG-E M E NT 1 ,� P -7-8--G S 111973 00328 WESTERN FARM CENTER 163.10 111975 07518 YAMAS CONTROLS, INC. 2,071.66 —1-1-1-9-7-6— 0-4.7_1.5 Y_AR A B I_R.D ' S 6 F1 _O S 111977 07593 JANICE *YOUNG 475.00 111978 09717 YWCA OF SONOMA COUNTY 8,000.00 1 1 1 9 7 9 1-AO S D E1- O_R.AH Z.A.L�LI_N I 4 0 Total Demand: 217,413.59 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF ROHNERT PARK BILLS FOR APPROVAL December 12, 2000 Hand Check Numbers 2637-2640 Dated November 12-38, 2000 $55,338.35 Less Previously Approved (11/14&28) ($49,968.35) Total 1 $5,370.00 �• S ID VALUE S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ME 11:28 DEMAND LIST --- DEM AND—DATE-1-173-072-00-0 CHECK--#--- Total VENDOR—# -!-NAME HE -CK -70T -AL 002637 12069 COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS 7,400.00 002638 11885 OLD REPUBLIC TITLE CO 10,000.00 _0-0-2-63-9--- -- 11-3-38--- ---NOL-L—&—TAM 32—,s -6-8—.3s- 2 ,5-G S..35002940 002940 07353 PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CNTR. ,370.00 5,370.00- Total Dements: 55,338.35 INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM (27 To: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Sandra M. Lipitz City Manager Netter City Engineer Gaffney Finance Director City Attorney Strauss Assistant City Manager Leivo Accountant/Auditor Raymond Management Analyst Fogle Date: November 29, 2000 CASH BALANCES AS OF JULY 31, 2000 General Fund Payroll Account Traffic Safety Fund Motor Vehicle License Fees R. E. M.I.F. Special Water Connection Fee Fund Per Acre For Development Fee Fund Water/Wastewater Fee Fund(Dev. Imp. Fund) Sewer Service Connection Fee Fund Water/Wastewater Fee Fund(Spec. Sewer Conn. Fund) Water Utility Fund Sewer Utility Fund Garbage Utility Fund Garbage Utility Fund -Commercial Set-aside Fund General Fund -Refundable Deposits Utility Fund -Refundable Deposits Improvement Project Fund Gas Tax Fund: Sec. 2107 Maint./Const. Sec. 2107.5 Engineering Sec. 2106 Const./Maint. Sec. 2105 SB 140 Transportation Development Act(TDA) Fund Capital Outlay Fund I.S.T.E.A. Fund Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Fund Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLESF) Fund Fire Benefit Assessment(Measure M) Fund Annexation Fees Fund Rent Appeals Board Fund Copeland Creek Drainage Facilities Fund Debt Service Fund Traffic Signals Fund Vehicle Abatement Fund Performing Arts Center Endowment Fund Dental Self -Insurance Fund Petty Cash General Fund Reserve Reserve For Self -Insured Losses Reserve For Retired Employee Medical Reserve For Infrastructure Maintenance Reserve For P.E.R.S. Costs -Public Safety Employees Reserve For P.E.R.S. Costs -Miscellaneous Employees Reserve for Dev. of Add'I Rec. Facilities Miscellaneous Reserve(CDA Loan Principal Repayment) Reserve For Housing Programs Reserve For Active Employee Medical Sub -Total Operating Cash Special Enforcement Unit -South Cash with Fiscal Agent (Earned Interest Fund) Cash with Fiscal Agent (Refunding Dist 1983-10A) Cash with Fiscal Agent (1993 Consolidated Refunding District) Sub -Total City Cash ($399,652.86) 0.00 18,330.58 166, 980.40 (45,570.00) ($259,911.88) 870,809.03 1,859,703.71 16,033.88 6,030,890.38 16,033.88 2,239,369.36 2,538,478.59 17,129.82 400,039.48 122,958.95 85,435.00 1,109,551.89 $419,354.02 0.00 131,691.25 194,766.72 28,607.83 774,419.82 Employee Deferred Compensation(City is Trustee): Deferred Compensation- Washington Mutual 457 Plan Deferred Compensation- ICMA 401(a) Plan Deferred Compensation- ICMA 457 Plan -Full Time Employees Deferred Compensation- Washington Mutual -Part Time Employees Plan Total Employee Deferred Compensation TOTAL CASH (4,000.00) (35,881.93) 0.00 3,925.92 92,047.12 52,142.17 49,840.00 66,497.46 60,054.21 0.00 1,116,272.10 9,595.44 1,752,922.00 (42,313.21) 4,100.00 307,166.00 1,655,305.00 1,077, 500.00 301,972.00 288,580.99 749,184.69 231,257.00 0.00 302,399.00 206,733.00 24,066,240.87 594,055.47 0.00 0.00 499,860.04 25,160,156.38 2,296,544.46 1,742,945.95 8,616, 589.37 182, 818.77 12,838,898.55 $37,999,054.93 AW . CITY OF ROHNERT PARK -SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS -JULY 31, 2000 Source of Investment Maturity Interest Par Value of Curr. Mkt. Val. Investment Investment Institution Type Date Rate Investment Of Investment Valuation Exchange Bank Savings Passbook Svgs N/A @ 2.000% $77,728.50 $77,728.50 Note (1) Citizens Fed. Svgs. Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/28/00 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Franklin Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/28/00 @ 5.950% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Approved Federal Svgs. & Loan Cert.of Deposit 09/01/00 @ 5.901% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Crescent Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/26/00 @ 6.420% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Metropolitan Bank & Trust Cert.of Deposit 09/28/00 @ 5.901% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Capitol Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/25/00 @ 6.360% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Bank of Petaluma Cert.of Deposit 11/01/00 @ 6.350% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Quad City Bank & Trust Cert.of Deposit 11/12/00 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Michigan Heritage Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/08/00 @ 6.410% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Argo Federal Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/21/00 @ 5.370% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Hamilton Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/21/00 @ 6.400% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Superior Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/13/01 @ 5.370% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First State Bank of Colorado Cert.of Deposit 01/27/01 @ 5.400% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Jefferson Bank & Trust Cert.of Deposit 02/05/01 @ 6.160% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Premier Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/11/01 @ 6.150% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Redwood Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/11/01 @ 6.100% 500,000.00 500,000.00 Note (1) Riverway Trust Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/08/01 @ 6.800% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Family Federal Savings Cert.of Deposit 03/12/01 @ 6.630% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Mid America Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/06/01 @ 5.810% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Family Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/14/01 @ 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Liberty Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/15/01 @ 5.460% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) International Bank of Miami Cert.of Deposit 04/26/01 @ 6.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Farmers Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/28/01 @ 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Eaton Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/28/01 @ 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cole Taylor Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/06/01 @ 5.520% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Golden Security Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/11/01 @ 6.100% 90,000.00 90,000.00 Note (1) Provident Bank of Maryland Cert.of Deposit 05/13/01 @ 5.510% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Citizens State Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 @ 6.140% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Financial Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 @ 6.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Chevy Chase Fed. Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 @ 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Mountain West Bank of Helena Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 @ 5.507% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) National Republic Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/30/01 @ 7.850% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Saratoga National Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/04/01 @ 6.200% 300,000.00 300,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Michigan Cert.of Deposit 06/12/01 @ 6.200% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) NAB Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/12/01 @ 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Nevada Cert.of Deposit 06/29/01 @ 7.600% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Valencia National Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/24/01 @ 5.350% 300,000.00 300,000.00 Note (1) First Bank of Brunswick Cert.of Deposit 07/31/01 @ 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Amcore Bank N.A. Cert.of Deposit 08/04/01 @ 6.210% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Enterprise Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/05/01 @ 6.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First America Bank & Trust Cert.of Deposit 08/06/01 @ 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cornbelt Bank & Trust Cert.of Deposit 08/06/01 @ 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Milwaukee Western Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/10/01 @ 6.400% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Bay Financial Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/13/01 @ 6.070% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) American Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/01/01 @ 5.900% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Associates National Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/17/01 @ 5.750% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Georgetown Bank & Trust Cert.of Deposit 09/17/01 @ 6.450% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Treasury Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/18/01 @ 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Citizens Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/21/01 @ 5.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Parkvale Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/16/01 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Feliciana Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/23/01 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Republic Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/26/01 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Advanta National Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/13/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Greene County Bank' Cert.of Deposit 02/01/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Capital One Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/02/02 @ 5.540% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) M&T Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/03/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Great Southern Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/16/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Commerce National Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/17/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FNB Southwest Cert.of Deposit 03/26/02 @ 5.560% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Oakwood Deposit Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/08/02 @ 5.600% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Landmark Community Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/21/02 @ 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) BankFirst N.A. Cert.of Deposit 06/15/02 @ 6.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Upstate National Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/25/02 @ 7.350% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Eaton Federal Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/27/02 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Houston Community Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/14/02 @ 6.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Admiralty Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/17/02 @ 7.360% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cross Country Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/25/02 @ 6.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Nati. Bk. of the Rockies Cert.of Deposit 08/08/02 @ 6.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Union Bank of the West Cert.of Deposit 09/04/02 c@D 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 09/09/02 @ 5.715% 500,000.00 486,497.00 Note (2) Pocahontas Federal S&L Cert.of Deposit 09/09/02 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (2) Fidelity Federal Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/16/02 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (2) Provident Bank of Ohio Cert.of Deposit 12/18/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 01/14/03 @ 6.500% 500,000.00 498,269.00 Note (2) East Stroudsburg Savings Cert.of Deposit 02/25/03 @ 5.550% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Providjan National Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/28/03 @ 7.330% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 04/07/03 @ 6.000% 1,000,000.00 972,899.00 Note (2) rASu DISTBIRIITION AS QF JULY 31. 2000 Petty Cash $4,100.00 Payroll Checking Account -Exchange Bank 0.00 General Checking Account -Exchange Bank @ 0.750% 100,399.69 Measure M Refund Checking Account -Exchange Bank @ 0.000% 65,143.41 Utility Checking Account -Exchange Bank @ 0.750% 2,457.10 Recreation Checking Account -Exchange Bank @ 0.750% 10,375.21 Subtotal of Petty Cash and Checking Accounts 182,475.41 Investment Accounts -See Schedule of Investments Attached 24,977,680.97 Cash With Leasing Company/Municipal Leasing: Fidelity Investments @ 5.040% 0.00 Cash With Fiscal Agent (Earned Interest Fund) @ 5.513% 0.00 Subtotal of Cash With Fiscal Agent 0.00 Employee Deferred Compensation(City is Trustee): Deferred Compensation -Washington Mutual 457 Plan 2,296,544.46 Deferred Compensation-ICMA 401(a) Plan 1,742,945.95 Deferred Compensation-ICMA 457 Plan -Full Time Employees 8,616,589.37 Deferred Compensation -Washington Mutual -Part -Time Employees Plan 182,818.77 Total Employee Deferred Compensation 12,838,898.55 Total Cash Distribution $37,999,054.93 Investment Yield for JULY 2000 6.131% The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #2000-108, adopted March 23, 2000. The City currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six mont Commerce National Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/14/03 @ 5.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 jW Note (1) International Finance Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/21/03 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Farmers St. Bk. of New Madison Cert.of Deposit 04/24/03 @ 7.110% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First State Bank of Huntington Cert.of Deposit 04/27/03 @ 7.100% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) National Penn Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/21/03 @ 5.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 05/30/03 7.875% 1,000,000.00 1,005,938.00 Note (2) Capital One Federal Svgs Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/19/03 6.250% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Shelby County Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/28/03 6.320% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Nations Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/03/03 5.500% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Credicard National Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/19/03 @ 6.300% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 10/29/03 @ 6.020% 1,000,000.00 968,369.00 Note (2) Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. Cert.of Deposit 11/01/03 @ 6.700% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Bank of Arkansas Cert.of Deposit 11/01/03 @ 6.700% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Keybank USA Cert.of Deposit 11/05/03 @ 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 11/18/03 @ 6.000% 500,000.00 483,684.00 Note (2) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 01/05/04 @ 6.000% 1,000,000.00 963,520.00 Note (2) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 01/20/04 @ 6.060% 500,000.00 482,469.00 Note (2) Heritage Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/26/04 @ 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FNMA Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 02/19/04 @ 6.000% 500,000.00 481,287.50 Note (1) Americaunited Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/28/04 @ 7.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FNMA Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 04/26/04 @ 6.020% 500,000.00 480,906.50 Note (2) Heritage Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/01/04 @ 7.310% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Klamath First Federal S&L Cert.of Deposit 05/04/04 @ 7.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 05/10/04 @ 6.135% 498,828.13 482,266.00 Note (2) FHLB Med. Term Step-up Note Medium Term Note 06/01/04 @ 5.750% 500,000.00 485,096.50 Note (1) Park Avenue Bank Cert.,of Deposit 06/04/04 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Marin Cert.of Deposit 06/28/04 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Chicago Cert.of Deposit 08/11/04 @ 6.750% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Med. Term Note Cert.of Deposit 08/17/04 @ 7.050% 500,000.00 493,017.50 Note (1) Bank One Cert.of Deposit 08/19/04 @ 6.620% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Bank USA Cert.of Deposit 09/21/04 @ 6.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Broadway National Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/12/04 @ 6.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First State Bank of North Dakota Cert.of Deposit 11/03/04 @ 6.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) DMB Community Bank Cert.of Deposit 11/15/04 @ 6.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Lighthouse Community Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/06/05 @ 7.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Providian Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/03/05 @ 7.280% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Peoples Bank of Franklin County Cert.of Deposit 05/04/05 @ 7.450% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Valley Bank of Arizona Cert.of Deposit 05/08/05 @ 7.440% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Richfield Bank & Trust Cert.of Deposit 06/08/05 @ 7.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) State of Calif.-LAIF Pooled Investments N/A @ 5.800% 4,795,826.56 4,795,826.56 Note (3) Sonoma Co.lnvestmt. Pool Pooled Investments N/A @ 5.598% 102,437.74 102,437.74 Note (4) Subtotal $24,477,820.93 $24,263,211.80 1983-10 Ref. Dist. Res.-So.Co. @ 5.598% 0.00 0.00 Note (5) 1993 Consol.Ref.Dist.-So.Co. @ 5.598% 499,860.04 499,860.04 Note (5) Totals $24,977,680.97 $24,763,071.84 Note (1) These are investments in Certificates of Deposit. Current Market Value and Par Value are typically equal. Note (2) Gilford Securities current market values as of July 31, 2000 are presented. Note (3) These are funds invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund, State of California. Current Market Value and Par Value are typically equal. Interest is received quarterly and the Par Value remains the same. Note (4) These are funds invested in the Sonoma County Investment Pool. Current Market Value and Par Value are typically equal. Interest is received quarterly and the Par Value remains the same. Note (5) These funds are being held by Sonoma County acting as a Fiscal Agent for the City of Rohnert Park. Project No. and Description IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Summary of Revenue & Expenditures As Of July 31, 2000 Balance @ 30 -Jun -00 Current Fiscal Year Revenue Expenditures Balance @ 30 -Jun -00 1977-04 Transport Avenue Ext.A.D. 29,487.98 0.00 0.00 29,487.98 1978-01 SnyderLn/Hinebaugh Cr A.D. 23,319.67 0.00 0.00 23,319.67 1979-05 Classic Ct. Assess.Dist. 8,387.21 0.00 0.00 8,387.21 1979-10 Laguna Verde Assess.Dist. 11,122.68 0.00 0.00 11,122.68 1983-10 Professional Ctr Dr.A.D. 28,133.01 0.00 0.00 28,133.01 1991-04 RPX/101 0/Cross-Phase II 225,614.74 0.00 0.00 225,614.74 1993-06 Street Lighting Acquisition (300,303.00) 0.00 0.00 (300,303.00) 1994-07 Snyder Lane Bikepath (203,941.05) 0.00 0.00 (203,941.05) 1994-08 M Park -Phase II 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 1995-07 Rubberized RR Crossing 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 1995-09 Public Safety No. L.U.S.T. 0.00. 0.00 1996-01 RPX Interchng. Improvmts. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1996-12 Snyder Ln Parcel Landscape 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1997-02 Commerce/Laguna Bikepath (4,281.00) 0.00 0.00 (4,281.00) 1997-06 Toilet Replacemt Program 240,109.95 0.00. 600.00 239,509.95 1997-08 Sewer 1/1 Repairs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-03 Water Storage Tanks (3) 160,182.90 0.00 0.00 160,182.90 1998-04 Teen Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-05 Well #42 -Hageman Lane 1,278.00 0.00 0.00 1,278.00 1998-06 Overlays -1998 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-07 Copeland Crk. Bikepath Redo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-08 PAL Building Remodel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-09 Sidewalk Access Ramps (7,013.50) 0.00 0.00 (7,013.50) 1998-10 Emergency Driveway-P/S 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-11 Community Center Sculpture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-02 Medical Ctr. Site Improvement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-03 City Hall Building (56,405.05) 6,164.65 0.00 (50,240.40) 1999-05 G.I.S. Basemap 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-06 PS Water Imps/99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-08 Sewer Flow Test(A/B Sections) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-09 M Pool 435,551.66 0.00 43,200.00 392,351.66 1999-10 Snyder Lane Widening 0.0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-11 SCADA System Update 39,312.50 0.00 0.00 39,312.50 1999-12 Copeland Crk. Extension 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-13 Pavement Mgmt. Database 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-14 Park Play Structures 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-15 Community Ctr Complex Imps. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-16 Stadium Lands Appraisals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2000-01 Civic Ctr. Area Improvements (858.00) 0.00 0.00 (858.00) 2000-02 County CAD/RMS System (2,180.00) 0.00 0.00 (2,180.00) 2000-03 Camino Colegio Reconstr. (2,856.00) 0.00 0.00 (2,856.00) 2000-04 W/W Basin Removal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2000-05 Traf Signal Control Replacemts 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 Sub -total $804,662.70 $6,164.65 $43,800.00 $767,027.35 Add: Temporary Funding From Sewer Connection Fee Fund(Council Authorized) For Purchase of Street Light System(Project 1993-06) $300,303.00 Error Correction For CDC Project Expense Reimbursement Deposited In City Checking 43,610.97 Accounts Payable- Fund 310 Projects 11,441.08 Accounts Payable -Fund 540 Projects 0.00 Accounts Receivable (Reimbursement due Project 1996-06) (12,830.51) Total Improvement Project Fund $1,109,551.89 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Recap of Project Expenditures As of July 31, 2000 Est. Total Current Mo. Fiscal Year Expenditures Project Project No. and Description: Expenditures Expenditures Total Expenditures 1977-04 Transport Ave Ext. A.D. 0.00 0.00 1,275,422.74 1,305,000 1978-01 SnyderLn/HinebaughCr A.D. 0.00 0.00 572,379.87 595,700 1979-05 Classic Court Assess. Dist. 0.00 0.00 157,194.99 165,600 1979-10 Laguna Verde Assess. Dist. 0.00 0.00 1,521,881.45 1,533,000 1983-10 Professional Center Drive 0.00 0.00 530,849.06 548,900 1991-04 RPX/101 0/Cross-Phase II 0.00 0.00 1,849,692.97 1,885,000 1993-06 Street Lighting Acquisition 0.00 0.00 0.00 750,900 1994-07 Snyder Ln. Bikepath 0.00 0.00 361,465.53 365,000 1994-08 M Park -Phase II 0.00 0.00 363,704.77 365,000 1995-07 Rubberized RR Crossing 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000 1995-09 Public Safety North L.U.S.T. 0.00 0.00 1,326.00 50,000 1996-01 RPX Interchng. Improvmts. 0.00 0.00 14,003.25 700,000 1996-12 Snyder Ln Parcel Landscape 0.00 0.00 1,427.50 30,000 1997-02 Commerce/Laguna Bikepath 0.00 0.00 3,003.00 56,000 1997-06 Toilet Replacement Prog. 600.00 600.00 1,219,119.99 1,100,000 1997-08 Sewer 1/1 Repairs 0.00 0.00 4,213.50 30,000 1998-03 Water Storage Tanks(3) 0.00 0.00 1,353,590.35 1,450,000 1998-04 Teen Center 0.00 0.00 798,593.78 1,000,000 1998-05 Well #42 -Hageman Lane 0.00 0.00 56,319.96 58,000 1998-06 Overlays -1998 0.00 0.00 486,204.33 1,000,000 1998-07 Copeland Crk. Bikepath Redo 0.00 0.00 158,709.50 70,000 1998-08 PAL Building Remodel 0.00 0.00 24,830.89 40,000 1998-09 Sidewalk Access Ramps 0.00 0.00 7,013.50 200,000 1998-10 Emergency Driveway-P/S 0.00 0.00 106,809.68 70,500 1998-11 Community Center Sculpture 0.00 0.00 26,896.49 26,000 1999-02 Medical Ctr. Site Improvemen 0.00 0.00 3,874.50 15,000 1999-03 City Hall 0.00 0.00 62,569.70 4,700,000 1999-05 G.I.S. Basemap 0.00 0.00 7,023.98 7,100 1999-06 PS Water Imps/99 0.00 0.00 12,175.00 15,000 1999-08 Sewer Flow Test(A/B Section 0.00 0.00 45,400.00 100,000 1999-09 M Pool 43,200.00 43,200.00 83,838.34 700,000 1999-10 Snyder Ln. Widening 0.00 0.00 923.00 10,000 1999-11 SCADA System Upgrade 0.00 0.00 10,687.50 400,000 1999-12 Copeland Crk. Extension 0.00 0.00 6,284.00 100,000 1999-13 Pavement Mgmt. Database 0.00 0.00 2,478.00 10,000 1999-14 Park Playground Structures 0.00 0.00 179,344.00 180,000 1999-15 Community Ctr Complex Imp 0.00 0.00 750.02 30,000 1999-16 Stadium Lands Appraisals 0.00 0.00 5,472.98 50,000 2000-01 Civic Ctr Area lmprvmnts 0.00 0.00 858.00 1,000,000 2000-02 County CAD/RMS System 0.00 0.00 34,426.64 50,000 2000-03 Camino Colegio Reconstr. 0.00 0.00 2,856.00 250,000 2000-04 W/W Basin Removal(Fd 310) 0.00 0.00 13,983.50 300,000 TOTALS $43,800.00 $43,800.00 $11,367,598.26 $21,371,700 CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Summary of Revenue and Expenditures As of July 31, 2000 Balance @ Current Fiscal Year Balance @ 30 -Jun -00 Revenue Expenditures 31 -Jul -00 Neighborhoods A & B ($31,937.25) $0.00 $0.00 ($31,937.25) Colegio Vista Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ladybug Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area West of Freeway 764.40 169.68 0.00 934.08 Eagle Park Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dorotea Park Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sunrise Park Area 6,440.00 0.00 0.00 6,440.00 Mt.Shadows/Coleman Valley 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rohnert Foothills (Area G) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S.of E.Cotati Ave.(M Section) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Foothills 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R Section 174.87 0.00 0.00 174.87 Community Facilities (13,665.67) 11,185.02 0.00 (2,480.65) Open Space (5,712.98) 0.00 0.00 (5,712.98) Subtotal ($43,936.63) $11,354.70 $0.00 ($32,581.93) Less: Accounts Receivable (Re: 4H of Sonoma Co. Deferred Fees) (3,300.00) Total Capital Outlay Fund ($35,881.93) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: The Chairman and Members of the Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park Executive Director Netter City Engineer Gaffney Asst. to the Exec. Dir. Leivo City Attorney Strauss Accountant/Auditor Raymond Management Analyst Fogle CASH BALANCES AS OF JULY 31, 2000 Improvement Project Fund Cash From Property Tax Increment Low & Moderate Income Housing Fund Innovative Housing Rent Fund Interest From Bond Proceeds Refundable Deposits -Innovative Housing Rents Interest From Increment Debt Service Fund (1991 TARB) Debt Service Reserve Fund (1991 TARB) Lease Payment Fund (1991 RCOP) Redevelopment Fund (1999 TABs) Debt Service Reserve Fund (1999 TABs) TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CASH FROM: Sandra M. Lipitz OL Treasurer DATE: November 15, 2000 $0.00 27,296.22 2,618,740.08 5,241 .51 77,690.69 3,396.26 150,756.49 640,280.10 1,134,390.55 516.47 10,770,358.12 1,226,432.68 $16,655,099.17 CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF JULY 31, 2000 Checking Accounts: Interest Rate Exchange Bank Checking Account 0.75% $55,836.24 Housing Rehabilitation Checking A\C Exchange Bank 0.75% 36,627.45 Subtotal -Checking Accounts Investment Accounts: 4' . .- $92,463.69 CASH HELD BY FISCAL AGENTS: Investment Maturity Interest Investment Institution Type Date Rate Par Value Market Value First Trust -1991 TARB's: Interest Fund: Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund Tax Allocation Principal Fund: Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund Tax Allocation Refunding Reserve Fund: FHLMC M/T Note M/T Note Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund Total 1991 TARB Reserve and Interest Fun 1994 Lease Payment Fund: Pacific Horizon Treasury Fund COP Lease Payment Fund: Pacific Horizon Treasury Fund Total 1991 C.O.P. Funded Interest N/A 5.170% 640,278.57 640,278.57 Note (1) N/A 5.170% 1.53 1.53 Note (1) 11/25/08 6.430% 1,000,000.00 934,400.00 Note (2) N/A 5.170% 134,390.55 134,390.55 Note (1) Fund 1,774,670.65 1,709,070.65 5.170% 516.47 516.47 Note (1) 5.170% 0.00 0.00 Note (1) 516.47 516.47 1,774,670.65 516.47 US Bank -Trustee -1999 TABs: Investment Maturity Interest Source of Investment Institution Type Date Rate Par Value Market Value Valuation Exchange Bank Passbook N/A 2.020% 40,762.97 40,762.97 Note (1) First Central State Bank Cert.of Dep. 01/12/01 7.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Quad City Bank & Trust Cert.of Dep. 02/18/01 6.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Credit America Savings Cert.of Dep. 12/13/01 6.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Providian National Bank Cert.of Dep. 03/16/02 7.090% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Key Bank USA Cert.of Dep. 05/04/02 5.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cross Country Bank Cert.of Dep. 10/01/02 6.800% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Capital One Fed. Svgs. Cert.of Dep. 06/19/03 6.250% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Valencia National Bank Cert.of Dep. 06/23/03 7.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Americaunited Bank Cert.of Dep. 03/28/04 7.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) State of Calif.-LAIF Pooled Invs. NIA 5.800% 1,795,944.65 1,795,944.65 Note (1) Sonoma Co Invsmt Pool Pooled Invs. N/A 5.598% 16,317.89 16,317.89 Note (1) 2,747,025.51 2,747,025.51 2,747,025.51 CASH HELD BY FISCAL AGENTS: Investment Maturity Interest Investment Institution Type Date Rate Par Value Market Value First Trust -1991 TARB's: Interest Fund: Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund Tax Allocation Principal Fund: Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund Tax Allocation Refunding Reserve Fund: FHLMC M/T Note M/T Note Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund Total 1991 TARB Reserve and Interest Fun 1994 Lease Payment Fund: Pacific Horizon Treasury Fund COP Lease Payment Fund: Pacific Horizon Treasury Fund Total 1991 C.O.P. Funded Interest N/A 5.170% 640,278.57 640,278.57 Note (1) N/A 5.170% 1.53 1.53 Note (1) 11/25/08 6.430% 1,000,000.00 934,400.00 Note (2) N/A 5.170% 134,390.55 134,390.55 Note (1) Fund 1,774,670.65 1,709,070.65 5.170% 516.47 516.47 Note (1) 5.170% 0.00 0.00 Note (1) 516.47 516.47 1,774,670.65 516.47 US Bank -Trustee -1999 TABs: 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Redevelopment Fund: Local Agency Investment Fund N/A 5.800% 5,650,017.48 5.,650,017.48 Note (2) First Amer. Treas. Note Treas. Note N/A 5.178% 855,730.38 855,730.38 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 03/22/01 5.400% 1,000,000.00 991,300.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 08/18/00 5.400% 704,156.25 699,650.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 10/16/00 5.400% 792,125.00 796,400.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 02/22/01 5.500% 800,000.00 793,360.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 04/12/01 5.440% 1,000,000.00 991,300.00 Note (2) First Amer. Treas. Note Treas. Note N/A 6.000% 11,961.06 11,961.06 First Amer. Treas. Note Treas. Note N/A 6.000% 279,224.50 279,224.50 Note (2) Total 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Redevelopment Fund: 11 093,214.67 5,418,925.94 11,093,214.67 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Reserve Fund: FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 2/25/02 5.700% 890,000.00 869,708.00 Note (2) First Amer. Treas. Note Treas. Note N/A 4.400% 57,208.18 57,208.18 Note (2) 947 208.18 926,916.18 947,208.18 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CASH $16,655,099.17 Investment Yield for JULY 2000 5.640% The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy of the Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #2000-108, adopted on March 23, 2000. The Commission currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six months. Note (1) The source of valuation for these investments is their respective monthly statements. The Par Value and Market Value for these investments are typically the same as interest is paid or wired monthly. Note(2) The source of valuation for this investment is the July 31, 2000 US Bank Trust Statement. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 Summary of Revenue and Expeditures July 31, 2000 Project No. and Description 1999-04 Library 1999-04 Library Funding(Bonds) Other CDC Projects(TBD) Totals Deduct: Duplicate Transfer to G/F due C Balance @ 30 -Jun -00 ($347,452.39) 5,252,155.77 5,820,674.96 10,725,378.34 (43,610.97) $10,681,767.37 Current Fiscal Year Revenue Expenditures $0.00 42,040.74 46,550.01 $88,590.75 Current Mo. Fiscal Year Project No. and Description: Expenditures Expenditures 1980-0 Performing Arts Center 1984-21 Expressway Extension 1986-25 Seed Farm Drive Extension 1987-15 Roberts Lake Road 1988-15 Swim Center 1988-18 Public Safety Building 1988-23 Senior Center 1989-12 RP Expwy Widening 1990-02 R.P.J.H. Gym/Bldg 1990-05 A Park Lights 1990-14 Animal Shelter 1991-01 Commerce BI. Bikepath 1991-04 RPX/101 Overcrossing 1992-01 SW Blvd Landscaping 1999-04 Library Totals Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed 0.00 $0.00 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed 0.00 $0.00 Balance @ 31 -Jul -00 $0.00 ($347,452.39) 0.00 5,294,196.51 0.00 5,867,224.97 $0.00 $10,813,969.09 Expenditures Total 7,343,365.73 1,297,481.39 30,867.66 1,547,369.43 144,688.38 7,184,580.56 851,620.35 308,383.61 750,000.00 93,897.69 1,393,699.43 120,476.95 374,340.99 11,803.35 351,036.43 (43,610.97) $10,770,358.12 Total Project Expenditures $7,343,366 1,297,482 30,868 1,547,370 144,689 7,185,000 851,621 308,384 750,000 93,898 1,393,700 161,000 375,000 11,804 5,000,000 $21,803,611.95 $26,494,182 ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHOR/TY INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: The Chairman and Board Members of the FROM: Sandra M. Lipitz Rohnert Park Financing Authority Authority Treasurer Executive Director Netter City Engineer Gaffney Management Analyst Fogle City & Authority Attorney Strauss Accountant/Auditor Raymond DATE: November 13, 2000 CASH BALANCES AS OF JULY 31, 2000 1999 C.0.P.'s-Capital Facilities Project: Capital Project Fund -1999 C.O.P.'s $4,985,528.33 Costs of Issuance Fund -1999 C.O.P.'s 21,922.13 Lease Payment Fund -1999 C.O.P.'s 154.66 1999 C.O.P.'s-Master Equipment Lease Program: Debt Service Fund -1999 Master Equipment Lease 997.40 Debt Service Reserve Fund -1999 Master Equipment Lease 184,872.92 Capital Project Fund -1999 Master Equipment Lease 1,009,641.76 Costs of Issuance Fund -1999 Master Equipment Lease 2,341.87 TOTAL ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY CASH $6,205,459.07 CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF JULY 31, 2000 CASH HELD BY FISCAL AGENTS: 1999 C.O.P.'s Costs of Issuance Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 5.900% $21,922.13 $21,922.13 Note (1) 1999 Master Equipment Lease -Lease Payment Funds: First American Treas Obligations N/A 5.900% $997.40 $997.40 Note (1) 1999 Master Equipment Lease -Reserve Funds: Maturity Interest Source of Investment Institution Date Rate Par Value Market Value Valuation Trust Accounts at US Bank: 1999 C O P 's Capital Facilities Project Funds: Funds 1999 C.O.P.'s Lease Payment Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 5.900% $54,926.92 $54,926.92 First American Treas Obligations N/A 5.900% $154.66 $154.66 Note (1) Total First American Treas Obligations N/A $154.66 $154.66 $954,714.84 Note (1) 1999 Master Equipment Lease Costs of Issuance First American Treas Obligations 1999 C.O.P.'s Capital Project Fund: Funds 5.900% $2,341.87 $2,341.87 Note (1) Local Agency Investment Fund N/A 5.800% $1,592,886.79 $1,592,886.79 Note (1) First American Treas Obligations N/A 5.900% 2,198,860.29 2,198,860.29 Note (1) FNMA Medium Term Note 10/16/00 6.300% 396,062.50 398,200.00 Note (2) FNMA Medium Term Note 12/15/00 5.700% 797,718.75 794,480.00 Note (2) Total $4,985,528.33 $4,984,427.08 1999 C.O.P.'s Costs of Issuance Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 5.900% $21,922.13 $21,922.13 Note (1) 1999 Master Equipment Lease -Lease Payment Funds: First American Treas Obligations N/A 5.900% $997.40 $997.40 Note (1) 1999 Master Equipment Lease -Reserve Funds: First American Treas Obligations N/A 5.900% $184,872.92 $184,872.92 Note (1) 1999 Master Equipment Lease Capital Project 1999 Series A-3 Year Equipment Fund: Funds First American Treas Obligations N/A 5.900% $54,926.92 $54,926.92 Note (1) 1999 Series A-5 Year Equipment Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 5.900% $954,714.84 $954,714.84 Note (1) 1999 Master Equipment Lease Costs of Issuance First American Treas Obligations N/A Funds 5.900% $2,341.87 $2,341.87 Note (1) $154.66 4,985,528.33 21,922.13 997.40 184,872.92 54,926.92 954,714.84 2,341.87 TOTAL ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY CASH $6,205,459.07 Investment Yield for JULY 2000 5.874% INVESTMENT POLICY & SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #2000-108, adopted on March 23, 2000. The Authority currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six months. Note(1) The source of valuation for this investment is the July 31, 2000 US Bank Trust Statement. However, the Par Value and Market Value are typically the same as interest is credited and paid monthly. Note(2) The source of valuation for this investment is the July 31, 2000 US Bank Trust Statement. 1 r ` r CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ORplI A CS, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT A/D. 6 6 1 ***City Clerk -Use Only*** Department: Planning Department Meeting Date Held Until Submitted By: Nancy Kaufman, Planning and Community Development AVoP7104) ? III --ft VA) Director Agenda Title: Ordinance repealing Municipal Codb"Chapter;17.64, Wireless /±RDeadline Date for: Communication Facilities, and adding a new Chapter 17:64,. Council Action: Communication Facilities That the City Council make Requested Council Action: the following findings. and approve the proposed Ordinance adopting new communication facility regulations as part of the Zoning Ordinance. and 1. - The proposed zoning text change is consistent with the ove aesthetic al ntent uali of of the C and the prthe Community ovision of Public Facilities Elements of the General Plan relative to the q., tY infrastructure to both existing and future residents. istent with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance as prescribed 2. The proposed zoning text change is cons in Municipal Code Section 17.02.020. 3. A duly noticed public hearing has been held to receive and consider public testimony regarding the proposed zoning text change. 4. The environmental findings as made by the Planning Commission. in. Res b the CitCounc lth. respect to the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration are hereby adoptedy tY . . ent Summary: On June 27,'2000 the City Council adopted a 90 day UrgenOrdlnfanenroacthmente permi develotmfor of a Telecommunications Ordinance and prohibiting the issuance tenications purposes in the interim. The Telecommunicati telecommunications ons Ordinance was ap roved' a Ci dinance, the Cou on September 26, 2000. As a companion .to the Telecommunicationsof theZoninOr Ordinance have existing een revised Communication acilities regulations contained in Chapter 17.64 and u d to reflect current technolo 'es and to address the aesthetic concerns with 1 su ort equipme late with both wireless and cable or fiber o tic facilities. The staff analysis summarizing the or lnance's provisions is included in the attached Staff Reportdated October 12, 2000. the On October 12, 2000, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (4 ayes) to recommend approval of Ordinance with the addition of the changes recommended in an October .12, 2000 memo from the Planning Director to the Comfor mission (attached) and directing staff al look into as in an Done neighbo neighthe number borhood. The changes ham radio operators and limiting the number of commercial antennas Y incorporated into the Ordinance. Further, the .followin from. the October 12 memo have been g additional changes have been added to address the concerns of the Planning Commission. 1. Page 3, Section 17:64.042 C. has been amended to limit to one the number of HAM radio antenna structures than can be located on any one parcel. 2. Page 4, Section 17.64.050 A.3. has been added to limit to one the numberof tenna s a service provider lace in any one neighborhood Provisions limiting the types can phd without approval of a conditional use permit. -use zoning districts are already included in Sections 17.64.040 B. of towers allowed in residential and mixed and 17.64.042. h r Also, for clarification purposes, staff has made a proposed change to Section -17:64.040 C. to replace "backup "backup generator." For example, batteries used for backup power supply -power supply (e.g., generator)" with would not trigger a conditional use permit. Staff is also proposing changes to Sections 17.64.050 D. and EA. to add undergrounding as one of the siting preferences for ancillary support equipment. Underlining has been used to indicate the location of changes to the Ordinance since the Commission's October 12 meeting. Attachments: Draft Ordinance dated 11/8/00; PC minutes from October. 12, 2000; PC Resolution No. 2000-37; Memorandum from the Planning Director to the Conimiss orije: Changes to the Draft Communication Facilities Ordinance; PC Staff Report dated 10/ 12/00 with attachmeri'ts they existing Chapter 17.64 and .the Initial Study CITYAGER'.S RECOMMENDATION: O Consent Item Regular Time ( pproval () Public Hearing Required, O Not Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment ( ) Policy Determination by Council O City Comments: City Manager's Signature: Date. g � Council Action Vote: JH-h:ShellACouncil Agenda Transmittal City Clerk Use Only . 2 I y PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT - 11/8/00 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OH CODE AND RT PARK REPEALING THE EXISTING CHAPTER 17.64 OF THE MUNI CIPAL ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 17.64 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO COMMUNICATION FACILITIES The City, Council of the City of Rohnert Park does hereby ordain as. follows: . SECTION ONE. Chapter 17.64 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed. SECTION TWO. A new Chapter 17.64 is added to the Rohnert Park Municipal Code as follows: CHAPTER 17.64 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Sections: 17.64.010 Title 17.64.020 Purpose and intent 17.64.030 Definitions 17.64.040 Applicability 17.64.042 Exemptions, 17.64.050 Site development criteria 17.64.052 General development standards 17.64.060 Operations and maintenance standards 17.64.070 Conditional use permit 17.64.010 Title. This chapter shall be titled the Communication Facilities Ordinance of the city of Rohnert Park. 17 64 020 Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of this chapter is to establish development standards to regulate a placement and design of Communication dards which are P to preserve the unique visual character of the city; to establish developmentties; to consistent with federal law related to the developmentthhoovi ion ,of communication unication ' lservices acknowledge the community benefit .associated P Within the city; and to provide incentives for well designed and well placed facilities. 17.64.030. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words, phrases,_ and terms shall have the meanings set forth herein. Words not defined- shall be given their common and ordinary meaning. "Antenna" means any system of poles, panels, rods, reflecting discs or similar devices used for the transmission or reception of electromagnetic waves or radio frequency signals. PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT -- 11/8/00 "Collocation" means the location of two or more wireless, hard wire, or cable Communication Facilities on a single support structure or otherwise sharing a common location. Collocation shall also include the location of Communication Facilities with other facilities such as water tanks, light standards, and other utility facilities and structures. " Communication facility" means an unstaffed facility, generally consisting of antennas, and equipment cabinet or structure, and related equipment; which receives and/or transmits electromagnetic waves, light waves, radio frequencies or other types of signals. "Equipment cabinet" means a cabinet or structure used to house equipment associated with a wireless, hard wire, or cable communication facility. "Monopole" means a single freestanding pole, post, or similar structure, used to support equipment associated with a single communication facility. "Multipoint Distribution Service" means a microwave communication service that delivers video programming data and/or voice communication directly to subscribers including multichannel multipoint distribution series instructional television fixed services and local multipoint distribution services or as defined by the Section 207 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 1.4000 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations and any interpretative decisions thereof issued by the Federal Communications Commission "Service provider" means any authorized provider of communication `services. "Tower" means any ground or roof mounted pole, spire, structure, or combination thereof taller than 15 feet, including supporting lines, cables, wires, braces, and masts, intended primarily for the purpose of mounting an antenna or similar apparatus above grade. 17.64.040 Applicability. This Section shall apply to all proposed Communication Facilities, except as provided for in Section 17.64.042. A conditional use permit is required for the following uses: A. A Communications Facility that does not meet the applicable site development criteria, general development standards, and operation and maintenance standards outlined in Sections 17.64.050, 17.64.052, and 17.64.60, respectively. B. A Tower in a non-residential and non -mixed-use zoning district over 35' in height; provided, however, that a Tower of any height shall be prohibited in all residential and mixed-use zoning districts, except as set forth in Section 17.64.042 below; C. A Communications Facility, with a backup generator, located in a commercial or residential zoning district and a Communication Facility, in any zoning district, with anancillary fuel storage tank(s) to support the backup power supply. PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT --11/8/00 D. A Communications Facility or Tower that would not otherwise be permitted by serve all areas this Chapter but that is necessary for the. adequate development of facilities to Commission can within the city, to promote competition and achieve open access if the Planning make the findings set forth in Section 17.52.090. All proposed Communication Facilities that require a conditional use permit shall also require environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 17 64 042 Exemptions. A conditional use permit shall not. be required for Communication Facilities meeting the follow criteria: . A. Antennas that are installed, placed, or maintained under the roof, or do not extend above the roof, or are behind and below an approved roof screen and do not protrude above the lic highest point of the building or are camouflaged in such 'a way as to not be visible from shall be right-of-way or other property. However, staff approval from the slat forth in this subsection. required to ensure that such antennas comply .with the Historically significant buildings and structures listed on the National Register.of Historic Places survey or registry or the California Register, identified as an historic stn a havinre in g significant isto is contribution or as determined by a qualified architectural hist onan as g to the area shall not be exempt. B. The following Communication Facilities also shall not require a conditional use unted on a mast less than twelve feet (12') high, is not permit provided that the antenna is mo located on an historic building, and is not readily visible from a public right-of-way: in is 1. Any antenna structure that is one meter (39.37 inches) to -home satellite sereter vice, or less designed to ' receive direct broadcast satellite service, including as defined by Section 207 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and any interpretive decisions thereof issued by the Federal Communications Commission. 2. Any antenna structure that is two meters (78.74 inches) or less in diameter located in a commercial or industrial zone and is designed to transmit or receive Radio Communications by Satellite or Terrestrial Communications Antenna. 3. Any antenna structure that is one meter (39.37 inches) or less in diameter or diagonal measurement and is designed for subscribing to a Multipoint Distribution Service. 4. Any antenna that is designed and used solely, to receive television broadcast transmission. 3 PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT --11/8/00 C. Any antenna structure that is designed and used solely in connection with authorized operations of an amateur radio station licensed ' by the FCC (i.e., a "HAM" radio transmission) provided there is no more than one structure on a single parcel and that the antenna structure does not exceed maximum building height limits of the zoning district. 17.64.050 Site development criteria. The following development standards shall apply to the development of all new Communication Facilities within the city of Rohnert Park: A. Spacing and collocation. 1. New Communication Facilities shall be collocated with existing facilities and with other planned new facilities whenever feasible and aesthetically desirable. In addition, where feasible and aesthetically desirable, service providers. are encouraged to collocate with other facilities such as water tanks, light standards, and other utility structures where the collocation, is found to minimize the overall visual impact..Service providers shall exhaust all reasonable measures to co -locate their Communications Facilities on existing Towers or with or within existing' ancillary support equipment facilities prior to applying for new Communication Facility sites. The service provider shall provide evidence that the provider has contacted all other potential providers who have, or who are reasonably likely to be installing facilities within the vicinity of the proposed facility and has offered to participate in a joint installation project on reasonable terms. In order to facilitate collocation, conditions of approval for conditional use permits for new facilities shall require all service providers to cooperate in the siting of equipment and antennas to accommodate the maximum number of operators at a given site where found to be feasible and aesthetically desirable. 2. A minimum distance of 1,000' shall be provided between Towers. There shall be a maximum of two Towers per assessor's parcel or developed site. .3. A service provider shall not locate more than one antenna in any one neighborhood unless additional antennas are approved by the Planning Commission R Height. 1. All ground mounted communication equipment, antennas, poles or towers shall be of a minimum functional, height. 2. The height of a Tower located on the ground shall not exceed 35'. However, if a Tower is located in a district with a height limit greater than 35', then the Tower may exceed 35' if a conditional use permit is first approved by the Planning Commission. A Tower, however, shall not exceed 65' when located adjacent to residentially zoned properties and shall be setback at a ratio of two horizontal feet for every one -foot in height and shall not be readily visible to the nearest residentially zoned property. Under no. circumstances shall a Tower be higher than 75'. If it is determined that a Tower requires hazard lights to meet the safety requirements of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), or the California Highway Patrol (CHP), then the Tower shall be deemed too high. 4 PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT --.11/8/00 3. The height of a Communications Facility located on a building shall not exceed 15' above the maximum height limit for that district. 4. Antennas mounted -on the side of a building shall not extend above the building parapet. C. Colors and materials. All antennas, poles, towers or equipment, including ancillary support equipment, shall have a non -reflective finish and shall be painted or otherwise treated to match or blend with the primary background and minimize visual impacts. Antennas attached to a building shall be painted or otherwise treated, to match the exterior of the building or the antenna's background color. All ground -mounted equipment shall be covered with a clear anti - graffiti type material of a type approved by the Planning Director or shall be adequately secured to prevent'graffiti. D. Screening. All ground mounted equipment, antennas, poles, or towers shall be sited to be screened by existing development, topography, or vegetation, to the extent feasible. Ground mounted facilities are .encouraged to be located within buildings underground or in areas where substantial screening by existing buildings or vegetation can be achieved. Additional new vegetation or other screening may be required by the Planning Director or by the Planning Commission if a conditional use permit is required. The applicant shall use the smallest and least visible antennas possible to accomplish the owner/operator's coverage objectives. (See also Section 17.64.050.E. Siting below.) E. Siting. 1. Communication Facilities located on the roof of a building of legally conforming height shall be set back from the nearest roof edge the equivalent of the height of the Tower or a minimum of 10', whichever is greater. 2. Towers and antennas shall be setback at a ratio of two horizontal feet for every one . foot in height and shall not be readily visible to the nearest residentially zoned property. 3. Towers and antennas shall be set back from any site boundary or public right-of-way by a minimum of 25'.. No part of any Tower shall extend into any required front yard or beyond the property lines of the development site. 4. In order of preference, ancillary support equipment for a communication facility shall be located either within a building, underground, in a rear yard .or on a screened roof top area. Ground mounted facilities that are located within the front or side yard or public right-of-way shall be located so as to be screened by landscaping, in close proximity to existing above ground utilities (such as electrical tower or utility poles), light poles, trees 'of comparable height, water tanks, and other areas where the ground mounted facility will not detract from the image or appearance of the City. (See also Section 17.64.050 D. Screening above.) PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT --11/8/00 F. Power lines. All power lines to and within a communications site shall be underground. G. Backup Power Supplies. All backup power supplies (e.g., generators) located in an industrial zoning district shall be enclosed within an equipment enclosure and operated in accordance with Section 17.64.060.C. of this Chapter. Backup power supplies for Communication Facilities located in commercial or residential zoning districts shall require the approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. In any zoning district, ancillary fuel storage tank(s) to support backup power supplies shall require approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. 17.64.052. General development standards. A. Each facility shall comply with any and all applicable provisions of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code and any state or federal agency including, but not limited to, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). B. Certification must be provided that the proposed facility will at all times comply with all applicable health requirements and standards pertaining to electromagnetic and/or radio frequency radiation. C. Interference with city communication systems is prohibited. All proposed facility applications shall include reports, as required by the Department of Public Safety, to evaluate for potential interference (e.g., HF, UHF, VHF, eight hundred mHz). The applicant shall be responsible for any costs incurred by the city, including the costs of retaining consultants, to review and analyze the reports. D. The owner or operator of any facility shall submit and maintain current at all times basic contact and site information. Applicant shall notify city of any changes to the information submitted within thirty days of any change, including change of the name or legal status of the owner or operator. This information shall include, but is not limited to the following: 1. Identity, including name, address, and telephone number, and legal status of the owner of the facility including official identification numbers and FCC certification, and if different from the owner, the identity and legal status of the person or entity responsible for operating the facility; 2. Name, address and telephone number of a local contact person for emergencies; and 3. Type of service provided. Identification signs, including emergency phone numbers of the utility provider, shall be posted at all communication facility sites. E. As part of project review, the Planning Commission, the City Council (on appeals), or staffmay require additional screening and/or landscaping, undergrounding, an alternative color 6 PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT --11/8/00 scheme, or relocation of a tower or ancillary equipment -to a less obtrusive area of the site where it would have a less prominent visual presence due to slope, topography, size or relationship -to public right-of-ways. F. Discontinuation of use. All equipment associated with a Communication Facility shall be removed within thirty days of the discontinuation of the use and the site shall be restored to its original pre -construction condition. In addition, the service provider shall provide the city with a notice of intent to vacate a site a minimum of thirty days prior to the vacation. For facilities to be located on public property, this removal requirement, and appropriate bonding requirement, shall be included within the terms of the lease. For facilities to be located on private property, since the subject property owner shall be ultimately responsible for removal of the equipment, the terms of private leases are encouraged to include the equipment removal as a provision of the lease. G. A Communication Facility shall not adversely affect the public health, peace, safety or welfare. H. For service providers, who plan to establish multiple wireless Communication Facilities within the city, the service provider is encouraged to apply for approval of all facilities under a master use permit application. Under this approach, all proposed facilities may be acted upon by the city as a single, application. I. In the event that the Planning Director or Planning Commission needs assistance in understanding the technical aspects of a particular proposal, services of a communications consultant may be requested to determine the engineering or screening requirements of establishing a specific wireless communications facility. This service will be at the applicant's expense. 17 64 060 Operations and maintenance standards. A. All Communication Facilities and related equipment, including lighting, fences, shields, cabinets, and pole's shall be maintained in good repair, free from trash, debris, litter and graffiti and other forms of vandalism, and any damage from any cause shall be repaired as soon as reasonably possible so as to minimize occurrences of dangerous conditions or visual blight. Graffiti shall be removed from any facility or equipment as. soon as practicable, and in no instances more than forty-eight (48) hours from the time of notification by the city. B. Each Communication Facility which contains trees, foliage or other landscaping elements, whether or not used as. screening, shall be maintained in good condition at all times in accordance with the approved landscape plan, and the owner or operator of the facility shall be responsible for replacing any damaged, dead or decayed landscaping as promptly as reasonably possible. Amendments or modifications to the landscape plan shall be submitted for approval to the Planning Director. PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT --11/8/00 C. Each Communication Facility shall be operated in such a manner so as to minimize any possible disruption caused by noise. Backup generators shall only be operated during periods of power outages, and shall not be tested on weekends or holidays, or between the hours of 10 p.m: and 7 a.m. on weekday nights. At no time shall'equipment noise from any source exceed an exterior noise level of sixty (60) dB at the property line. D. Each owner or operator of a facility shall routinely and regularly inspect each site to ensure compliance with the standards set forth in this section. SECTION THREE. Severability. The city council hereby declares that every section, paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase is severable. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this article is for any reason found to be invalid or unconstitutional, such valid, or constitutionality shall not affect the validity or unconstitutionality of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this th day of ATTEST: CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor Vicki Vidak-Martinez APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy City Clerk Judy Hauff City Attorney Betsy Strauss 8 2000. ROHNERT PARK PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES THURSDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2000. The Planning Commission of the City of Rohnert Park met this date in a regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Conference Room, 6750 Commerce Blvd., with Chairperson Kilat presiding. Call To Order Chairperson Kilat called the meeting of the regular session to order at approximately 7:00 p.m. with Associate Planner Ron Bendorff leading the pledge. Roll Call Approval'of Minutes Unscheduled Public Appearances Present (4) Commissioners: Kilat, Mochel, Nordin, and Nilson Absent (1) Commissioner Militello Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, Associate Planner, Ron Bendorff, and Recording Clerk, Maria McConnell, were present. ; Upon motion by Commissioner Mochel,_ and seconded bTcommissioner Nordin, the Minutes of September 28, 2000, were,unanimously aPoroved. Gordon Anderson, 6050 Commerce Blvd., ohnert Park, was recognized and stated he wished to address the Planning Co ission regarding the Planning Commission meeting of September 14, 2000 an ile No. 1694 approving the expansion of Next Level Communications. He stat he had corrections.to the Minutes of that meeting he wished to submit. Mr. Anderson reference `page 7, paragraph 11. He stated that Mr. Oates did not work with the adjace business owners and this is an untruth. He stated that Mr. Oates was testi g under oath and paragraph 11 is a misstatement that is then left open to intetpretation. Mr. Ande on referenced page 8, paragraph 15, wherein Commissioner Mochel asked at the item be held over and in paragraph 23, Commissioner Militello stated tha ime is money." Mr. Anderson felt this was.'a demonstration of a "conflict of ere st" and that Commissioner Militello had a bias under the Brown Act in that the hearing body is not to have a preconceived attitude and Commissioner Militello's statement could be construed as a conflict of interest. Mr. Anderson referenced second to last paragraph on page 8, Chairperson Kilat's statement that the developer. address the jobs/housing .imbalance and the second paragraph on page 9 regarding traffic mitigation. He stated he oversaw AirTrac for many years and this company conducts studies as to why people use one form of 1 Planning Commission Minutes October 12, 2000 File No. 1899 Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance Amendment Park. Commissioner Mochel complimented Agilent Technologies for the use o ndscape materials and the planting of large trees.Chairperson Kila agreed with Commissioner Mochel and asked that 15 -gallon trees be used in a landscape plan. Chairperson Kilat stated she wished to address the sever ousirig problem in the Bay area and referenced the new General Plan's requi ent that the city maintain a job/housing balance. She advised the represe -ves of Agilent Technologies that a suggestion was made to Next Level munications during their recent Planning Commission appearance, that the consider working with the city in the future to consider having dialogue as to.what they can do to provide housing for their future employees. 'IX Mr. Dan Condron, stated Agilent echnologies is very active in the housing coalition and they, in fact, recently me ith the housing trust from Silicon Valley and they are in the process of: -.puffin ogether a housing trust for this area. Mr. Condron reassured the Cb�mmi oners that housing is ,one of their main concerns as they recognize that hoes' g is a business issue as well. Commissioner oche) and Commissioner Nordin complimented Agilent for being a leader in th raining of local workers and hoping that other businesses follow their lead. Com ssioner Mochel stated they are'doing a great service to alleviate some of the u n sprawl problems. Commissioner Nordin made the motion to approve Resolution 2000-36 approving Site Plan and Architectural Review for the expansion of an existing building and Use Permit, Site Plan and Architectural Review of a temporary modular office building, motion seconded by Commissioner Nilson, and unanimously approved. . Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, reviewed the staff report on an Ordinance of the City of Rohnert Park repealing the existing Chapter 17.64, Wireless Communication Facilities, to the Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) and adding a new Chapter 17.64, Communication Facilities to the Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance). Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, reviewed the history of the Ordinance and stated that on June 27, 2000 the City Council adopted a 90 -day Urgency Ordinance directing the development of a Telecommunications Ordinance and prohibiting the issuance of encroachment permits for telecommunications purposes in the interim. The Telecommunications Ordinance was approved by the City Council on September 26, 2000. She further . stated that as . a . companion to the Telecommunications Ordinance, the existing Wireless Communication Facilities regulations contained in Chapter 17.64 of the Zoning Ordinance have been revised and updated to reflect current technologies and to address the aesthetic concerns with ancillary support equipment associated with both wireless and cable or fiber optic facilities. The changes indicated in the proposed ordinance are those that have been made since the ordinance was distributed to the telecommunication companies for review and comment. Although the proposed ordinance is similar to the existing Wireless Communication ordinance, it has been expanded to cover a wide range of communication facilities including electromagnetic waves, light waves, radio 10 Nanning Commission Minutes October 12, 2000 frequencies and other types of signals. The exemptions ana site oeveiopmeni criteria also have been expanded to address new technologies for example, Direct TV, and to cover more thoroughly criteria relating to height, colors, materials, screening, and siting of antennas, poles, towers, and. ancillary equipment Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, stated she did receive comments from Advanced TelCom Group asking for a rewording of the Ordinance and read the rewording contained in Sections 17.64.030; 17.64.042(8)(2) page 3; Section 17.64.052(E) page 6. In addition; Advanced TelCom Group requested that the maximum height for exempted towers be increased from 35' to 40' which staff recommends against. Chairperson Kilat, asked how this ordinance differs. from one presented by Planning Director, Wendie Schulenburg wherein cellular poles and co -location sites were to be identified. Planning Director,, -Nancy Kaufman, stated that if all criteria's are met and they are asking for additi4Aal height, a Conditional Use Permit would be required. Chairperson Kilat expressed concern regarding EMF (electronic magnetic fields) and a proliferation of these towers being placed all over the city. Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, stated there are .not any standards at this time addressing EMF's but if and when they are established they would be addressed by the requirement that the facilities not affect the public health and safety. She also stated that. there are limitations as to how much the City can regulate certain facilities. Commissioner Nilson asked if this Ordinance is modeled after other city's Ordinances. Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, stated it is, however, the technology is changing so rapidly, the city has had to be very creative in addressing .the issues as they are presented to us. Commissioner. Mochel asked if the Ordinance applies .to antennas in residential areas. Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, stated if the antenna is screened and not visible from a public right-of-way or adjacent property, it is exempt. Commissioner Mochel referenced Section 17.64.042, page 3. and stated it virtually exempts ham radio operators. Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, stated ham radio operators are regulated by the .FCC and are very important during emergencies and they are a public interest so the city doesn't regulate them. She stated she would research this further and bring theinformation back to the Commissioners at the next meeting or she could advise the City Council that the Planning Commission asked that they study the matter further. Commissioner Mochel state that the Commission or Council should be able to require a change in a facility if problems that, were not anticipated in the review occur. Commissioner Nilson stated he feels an. applicant should be able to move forward 11 Planning Commission Minutes Matters from Commissioners Matters from Planning Director October 12, 2000 on a project after they have been approved by the Planning Commission and be assured .we are not going to later change the rules on them after the fact. Discussion ensued' regarding equipment removaland added conditions to the Ordinance and the possibility of the burden being on the city to remove outdated equipment. Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, stated the city doesn't have control over private property matters and if they meet all the conditions in the Ordinance, the applicant doesn't need prior approval: She stated that the Telecommunication Ordinance approved by the City Council is very detailed. Chairperson Kilat opened the public hearing. With no one wishing to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Nordin made the motion recommending approval of the Resolution to the City Council with the addition of the changes recommended in the Planning Directors mere wof October 12, 2000; and directing staff to look into ham radio operators and limiting the. amount of towers in any one neighborhood, motion seconded by Commissioner Mochel and unanimously approved. Chairperson Kilat asked staff who is conducting the traffic studies throughout the city. l Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, stated .that the City does n now, but they may be s the challengers to the General Plan who have filed awsuit against the city. Chairperson Kilat concurred. Chairperson Kilat asked if there isn't a requirement that traffic engineers have to notify the city that they are putting cables across the roadways. Planning Director, Nancy Kaufman, states that the City Engineer, Joe Gaffney did not have to approve the study bu 'he would like to see the data when the studies are completed. Planning Director, Nancy 06fman, advised that Next Level, the remodel of the Good Nite Inn, and Mat& Hotel esuites were approved by the City Council at their meeting of October 12000. PlanningDirect , Nancy Kaufman, stated there has been some changes made to the formatti of the staff reports and agenda and asked if the Commissioners had any inputA6 those changes and if so, please advise staff. Pla ing Director, Nancy Kaufman, advised the Commissioners that Associate P nner, Ron Bendorff and herself are working on a new Zoning Ordinance. She asked for direction from the Planning Commission if they would like to hold study sessions, set up a committee or use the internet to implement the changes to the Zoning Ordinance. She stated she welcomed input from the Commissioners as to how they would like to see the revision handled. Commissioner Nilson recommended that the Zoning Ordinance revisions be included in regularly scheduled meetings of the Planning Commission. Commissioner Mochel recommended one meetinsa for IPA Commission r - 217 PC RESOLUTION NO.2000-,5 ij A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE EXISTING CHAPTER 17.64 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 17.64 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO COMMUNICATION FACILITIES WHEREAS, on June 27, 2000 the City Council adopted a 90 -day Urgency Ordinance directing the development of a Telecommunications Ordinance and prohibiting the issuance of encroachment permits for telecommunications purposes in interim. WHEREAS, on September 26, 2000 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 660 adding Chapter 5.34 to the Rohne4,Park Municipal Code relating to the use of the public rights- . of -way and public property for telecommunications, phone; gas, electric, and other facilities and services. WHEREAS, as a companion to the Telecommunications Ordinance, the existing Wireless Communication Facilities regulations contained in Chapter 17.64 of the Zoning Ordinance have been revised and updated to -reflect current technologies and. to address the aesthetic concerns with ancillary support equipment associated with both wireless and cable or fiber optic facilities. WHEREAS, Planning, Application No. 1899, the proposed Communication Facilities Ordinance, was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, on October 12, 2000, the Planning Commission 'reviewed Planning Application No. 1899, the proposed Communication Facilities Ordinance, during a scheduled public meeting at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the project; .and, WHEREAS, at the October 12, 2000 Planning Commission meeting, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be, heard, the Commission considered all the facts relating to Planning Application No. 1899, the proposed Communication Facilities Ordinance. NOW,, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval to the City Council of Planning Application No. 1899, the proposed Communication Facilities Ordinance, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The proposed zoning text change is consistent with the overall intent of the Community Design and Public Facilities Elements of the General Plan relative to the aesthetic quality of the city and the provision of infrastructure to both existing and future residents. 2. That a duly noticed public hearing has been held to receive and consider public testimony regarding the proposed zone change. 3. An Initial Study was prepared -for the project, and on the basis of substantial evidence in the whole record before the Commission, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, therefore a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be approved which reflects the lead agency's independent judgement and analysis. The Planning Director in the -City of Rohnert Park Planning Department shall maintain the record of the proceeding on which this decision is .based. 4. The project would not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. There are no native species or plants, no unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants, no sensitive native vegetation on or adjacent to the. site. Further, there is no indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this,piroject. ' Section 3. Environmental Clearance.. An Initial Study was prepared for this project and indicates that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and accordingly a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby adopted. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of the.proposed Communication Facilities Ordinance, Planning Application No. 1899 DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 12th day of October, 2000, by the City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission by the following vote: Shawn Kilat, Chairperson, Rohnert Park Planning Commission Attest: Maria McConnell, Recording Secretary AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MILITELLO MOCHEL NILSON NORDIN KILAT 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK REPEALING THE EXISTING CHAPTER 17.64 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 17.64 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO COMMUNICATION FACILITIES The City Council of the City of Rohnert Park does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION ONE. Chapter 17.64 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code is repealed. SECTION TWO. A new Chapter 17.64 is added to the Rohnert Park Municipal Code as follows: CHAPTER 17.64 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Sections: 17.64.010 Title 17.64.020 Purpose and intent 17.64.030 Definitions 17.64.040 Applicability 17.64.042 Exemptions . 17.64.050 Site development criteria 17.64.052 General development standards 17.64.060 Operations and maintenance standards .17.64.070 Conditional use permit 17.64.010 Title. This chapter shall be titled the 'Communication Facilities Ordinance of the city of Rohnert Park. 17 64 020 Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of this chapter is to establish development standards to regulate the placement and design of Communication Facilities so as to preserve the unique visual character of the city; to establish development standards which are consistent with federal law related to the development of Communication Facilities; to acknowledge the community benefit associated with the provision of communication services within the city; and to provide incentives for well designed and well placed facilities. 17.64.030 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words, phrases, and terms shall have the meanings set forth herein. Words not defined shall be given their common and ordinary meaning. "Antenna" means any system of poles, panels, rods, reflecting discs or similar devices used for the transmission or reception of electromagnetic waves or radio frequency signals. "Collocation" means the location of two or more wireless, hard wire, or cable Communication Facilities on a single support structure or otherwise sharing a common location. Collocation shall also include the location of Communication Facilities with other facilities such as water tanks, light standards, and other utility facilities and structures. " Communication facility" means an unstaffed facility, generally consisting of antennas, and equipment cabinet or structure, and related equipment, which receives and/or transmits electromagnetic waves, light waves, radio frequencies or other types of signals. "Equipment cabinet" means a cabinet or structure used to house equipment associated with a wireless, hard wire, or cable communication facility. "Monopole" means a single freestanding pole, post, or similar structure, used to support equipment associated with a single communication facility. , "Multipoint Distribution Service" means a, wireless system that is designed to deliver data through the air at rates of up to 155 Mbps (typical cell phone voice calls use between 8 and 64 kbps depending on the system). "Service provider" means any authorized provider of communication `services. "Tower" means any ground or roof mounted pole, spire, structure, or combination thereof taller than 15 feet, including supporting lines, cables, wires, braces, and masts, intended primarily for the purpose of mounting an antenna or similar apparatus above grade. 17.64.040 Applicability. This Section shall apply to all proposed Communication I Facilities. eExcept as provided for in Section 17.64.042. A -a conditional use permit is required for the following uses: A. A Communications Facility that does not meet *the applicable site development criteria, general development standards, and operation and maintenance standards outlined in Sections 17.64.050, 17.64.052, and 17.64.60, respectively. B. A Tower in a non-residential and non -mixed-use zoning district over 35' in height; . provided, however, that a Tower of any height shall be prohibited in all residential and mixed-use zoning districts, except as set forth in Section 17.64.042 below; and C A Communications Facility with a backup power supply (e Qeneratorl located ,in a commercial or residential zoning district A Communication Facility, in any zonnn district with an ancillaly fuel storage tank(s) to support the backup power supply. DG. A Communications Facility or Tower that would not otherwise be permitted by this Chapter but that is necessary for the. adequate development of facilities to serve all areas within the city, to promote competition and achieve open access if the Planning Commission can make the findings set forth in Section 17.52.090. 2 All proposed Communication Facilities that require a conditional use permit shall also require environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 17 64.042 Exemptions. A conditional. use permit shall not be required for Communication Facilities meeting the follow criteria:. A. Antennas that are^installed, placed, or maintained under the roof, or do not extend above the roof, or are behind and below an approved roof screen and do not protrude above the highest.point of the building or are camouflaged in such a way as to not be visible from a public right-of-way or other property. However, staff approval from the Planning sanal Blaildiftg Departments shall be required to ensure that such'antennas comply with the standards set forth in this subsection. Historically significant buildings and structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register, identified as an historic structure in a local historic survey or registry or as determined by a qualified architectural historian as having significant historic. contribution to the area shall not be exempt. B. The following Communication Facilities also shall not require a conditional use permit provided that the antenna is mounted on a mast less than twelve feet (12') high, is not located on an historic building, and is not readily visible from a public right-of-way: 1. Any antenna structure that is one meter (39.37 inches) or less in diameter and is designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service; including direct -to -home satellite service, as defined by Section 207 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and any interpretive decisions thereof issued by the Federal Communications Commission. 2. Any antenna structure that is two meters (78.74 inches) or less in diameter located in a commercial. or industrial zone and is designed to transmit or receive Radio Communications by Satellite Antenna. 3. Any antenna structure that is one meter (39.37 inches) or less in diameter or diagonal measurement and is designed for subscribing to a Multipoint Distribution Service. 4. Any antenna that is designed and used solely to receive television broadcast transmission. C. Any antenna structure that is designed and used solely in connection with authorized operations of an amateur radio station licensed by the FCC (i.e., a "HAM" radio transmission) provided that the antenna structure does . not exceed maximum building height limits of the zoning district. -17.64.050 Site development criteria. The following development standards shall apply to he city of Rohnert Park: development of all new Communication Facilities within t A: Spacing and collocation. 1. New Communication Facilities shall be collocated with existing facilities and with other planned new facilities whenever feasible and aesthetically desirable. In addition, where feasible and aesthetically desirable, service providers are encouraged - to collocate with other facilities such as water tanks, light standards, and other utility structures where the collocation, is found to minimize the overall visual impact. Service providers shall exhaust all reasonable measures to co -locate their Communications Facilities on existing Towers or with or within existing ancillary support equipment facilities prior to applying for new Communication Facility sites. The service provider shall provide evidence that the provider has contacted all other potential providers who have, or who are reasonably likely to be installing facilities within the vicinity of the proposed . facility and has offered to participate in a joint installation project on reasonable terms. In order to facilitate collocation, conditions of approval for conditional use permits for new facilities shall require - all service providers to cooperate in the siting of equipment and antennas. to accommodate the maximum number of operators at a given site where found to be feasible and aesthetically desirable. 2. A minimum distance of 1,000' shall. be provided between Towers. There shall be a maximum of two Towers per assessor's parcel or developed site. B. Height. 1. All ground mounted communication equipment, antennas, poles or towers shall be of a minimum functional, height. 2. The height of a Tower located on the ground shall not exceed 35'. However, if a Tower is located in a district with a height limit greater than 35', then the Tower may exceed 35' if a conditional use permit is first approved by the Planning Commission. A Tower, however, shall not exceed 65' when located adjacent'to residentially zoned properties and shall be setback at a ratio of two horizontal feet for every one -foot in height and shall not be readily visible to the nearest residentially zoned.property. Under no circumstances shall .a Tower be higher than 75'. If it is determined that a Tower requires hazard lights to meet the safety requirements of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), or the California Highway Patrol (CHP), then the Tower shall be deemed too high. 3. The height of a Communications Facility located on a building shall not exceed 15' above the maximum height limit for that district. 4. Antennas mounted on the side of a building shall not extend above the building parapet. C. Colors and materials. -All antennas, poles, towers or equipment, including ancillary support equipment, shall have a non -reflective finish and shall be painted or otherwise treated to match or blend with the primary background and minimize visual impacts. Antennas attached to a building shall be painted or otherwise treated to match the exterior of the building or the antenna's. background color. All ground -mounted equipment shall be covered with a clear anti - graffiti type material of a type approved by the Planning Director or shall be adequately secured 4 to prevent graffiti. D. Screening. All ground mounted equipment, antennas, poles, or towers shall be sited to be screened by existing development, topography, or vegetation, to the extent feasible. Ground mounted facilities are encouraged to be located within areas where substantial screening by vegetation or other screening. creening may be existing vegetation can be achieved. Additional new required by the Planning Director or by the Planning Commission if a conditional use permit is required. as a eenditionof l fer the " miit The applicant shall use the smallest and least visible antennas possible to. accomplish the owner/operator's coverage objectives. (See also Section 17.64.050.E. Siting below.) E. Siting. 1. Communication Facilities located on the roof of a building of legally conforming height shall be set back from the nearest roof edge the equivalent of the height of the Tower or a minimum of 10', whichever is greater: 2. Towers and antennas shall be setback at a ratio of two horizontal feet for every one foot in height and shall not be readily visible to the nearest residentially zoned property. 3. Towers and antennas shall be set back from. any site boundary or public right-of-way by a minimum of 25'. No part of any Tower shall extend into any required front yard or beyond the property lines of the development site. 4. In order of preference, ancillary support equipment for a communication facility shall be located. either within a building, in a rear yard or on.a screened roof top -area. Ground mounted facilities that are located within the front or side yard or public right-of-way shall be located so as to be screened by landscaping, in close proximity to existing above ground -utilities (such as electrical tower or utility poles), light poles, trees of comparable. height; water tanks, and other areas where the ground mounted facility will not detract from the image or appearance of the City. (See also Section 17.64.050 D. Screening above.) F. . Power lines. All power lines to and within a communications site shall. be underground. G Baclaip Power Supplies All backup power supplies (e.g., generators) located in an industrial zoning district shall be enclosed within an equipment enclosure and operated in accordance with Section 17.64.060.C. of this Chapter. Backup power supplies for Communication Facilities located in commercial or residential zoning districts shall require the approval of a conditional use ermit b the Planum Corrrmissron. In an zoning district ancillary fuel storage tank(s) to support back-up power supplies shall require approval of a conditional use pen -nit by the Planning Commission. 17.64.052. General development standards. A. Each facility shall comply with any and all applicable provisions of the Rohnert Park Municipal. Code and any state or federal agency including, but not limited to, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). B. Certification must be provided that the proposed facility will at all times comply with all applicable health requirements and standards pertaining to electromagnetic and/or radio frequency radiation. C. Interference with city communication systems is prohibited. All proposed facility applications shall include reports, as required by the Department of Public Safety, to evaluate for potential interference (e.a., HF, UHF, � VHF, eight hundred mHz). The applicant shall be responsible for any costs incurred by the city, including the costs of retaining consultants, to review and analyze the reports. D. The owner or operator of any facility shall submit and maintain current at all times basic contact and site information.', Applicant shall notify city of any changes to the information submitted within thirty days of any change, including change of the name or legal status of the owner or operator. This information shall include, but is not limited to the following: 1. Identity, including name, address, and telephone number, and legal status of the owner of the facility including. official identification numbers and FCC certification, and if different from the owner, the identity and legal status -of the person or, entity responsible for operating the facility; 2. Name, address and telephone number of a local contact person for emergencies; and 3. Type of service provided. Identification signs, including emergency phone numbers of the utility provider, shall be posted at all communication facility sites. E. The Planning Commission or staff may require additional screening and/or landscaping, an alternative color scheme, or relocation of a tower or ancillary equipment to a less obtrusive area of the site where it would have a less prominent visual presence due to slope, topography, size or relationship to public right-of-ways. F. Discontinuation of use. All equipment associated with a Communication Facility shall be removed within thirty days of the discontinuation of the use and the site shall be restored to its original pre -construction condition. In addition, the. service provider shall provide the city with a notice of intent to vacate a site a minimum of thirty days prior to the vacation. For facilities to be located on public property; this removal requirement, and appropriate bonding requirement, shall be included within the terms of the lease. For facilities to be located on private property, since the subject property owner shall be ultimately responsible for removal of the equipment, the terms of private leases are encouraged to include the equipment removal as a provision of the lease. G. A Communication Facility shall not adversely affect the public health, peace, safety or welfare. H. For service providers, who plan to establish multiple wireless Communication Facilitiesmithin the city, the service provider is encouraged to apply'for approval of all facilities under a master use permit application. Under this approach, all proposed facilities may be acted upon by the city as a single application. I. In the event that the Planning Director or Planning Commission needs assistance in understanding the technical aspects of a particular proposal, services of a communications consultant may be requested to determine the • engineering or screening requirements .of establishing a specific wireless communications facility. This service will be at the applicant's expense. 17 64 060 Operations and maintenance standards. A. All Communication Facilities and related equipment, including lighting, fences, shields, cabinets, and poles shall be maintained in good repair, free from trash, debris, litter and graffiti and other forms of vandalism, and any damage from any cause shall be repaired as soon as reasonably possible so as to minimize occurrences of dangerous conditions or visual blight. Graffiti shall be removed from any facility or equipment as soon as practicable, and in no instances more than forty-eight (48) hours from the time of notification by the city. B. Each Communication Facility which contains trees, foliage or other landscaping elements, whether or not used as screening, shall be maintained in good condition at all times in accordance with the approved landscape plan, and the owner or operator of the facility shall be responsible for replacing any damaged,. dead or decayed landscaping as promptly as reasonably possible. Amendments or modifications to the landscape plan shall be submitted for approval to the Planning Director. C. Each Communication Facility shall be operated*in such a manner so as to -minimize any possible disruption caused by noise. Backup generators shall only be operated during periods of power outages, and shall not be tested on weekends or holidays, or between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekday nights. At no time shall equipment noise from any source exceed an exterior noise level of sixty (60) dB,at-the property line. D. Each owner or operator of a facility shall routinely and regularly inspect each site to ensure compliance with the standards set forth in this section. SECTION THREE. Severability. The city council hereby declares that every section, paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase is severable. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this article is for any reason found to. be invalid or .unconstitutional, such valid, or constitutionality shall not affect the validity or unconstitutionality of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this th day of 52000. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor Vicki Vidak-Martinez ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Deputy City Clerk Judy Hauff City Attorney Betsy Strauss TO: Chairperson Kilat and .Members of the Commission COPY: Betsy Strauss, City Attorney Angela Fogle, Management Analyst FROM: Nancy Kaufman -A�-- Planning & Community Dev. Director DATE: October 12, 2000 SUBJECT. Changes to the Draft Communication Facilities Ordinance --Agenda Item No. 6 Based on additional information and comments received from Advanced Te1Com Group, the following changes to the draft Communications Facilities Ordinance are proposed: 1. Section 17.64.030 Definitions (page 2): Replace definition of "Multipoint Distribution Service" with the following: "...means a Microwave Communication service that delivers video programming, data and/or voice communication directly' to subscribers, including multichannel multipoint distribution series, instructional television fixed services, and local multipoint distribution services, or as defined by the Section 207 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 1.4000 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations and any interpretative decisions thereof issued by the Federal Communications Commission." 2. Section 17.64.042(B)(2) (page 3): Replace Satellite Antenna with "Satellite or Terrestrial Communications Antenna." 3. Section 17.64.052(E) (page 6): Add "As part of project review," to the beginning of the paragraph and insert "City Council (on appeals)" after "Planning Commission." The revised wording would state, As part of project review, the Planning Commission, City Council (on appeals), or staff may require additional screening and/or...." Advanced Te1Com Group also requested that the maximum height for exempted towers (see Sections 17.64.040(B) and 17.64.050(B)(2) be 6750 Commerce Blvd. - Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486 - (707)588-2212 ' FAX: (707)588-2274 Members of the Planning Commission Page 2 increased from 35' to 40'. Their argument is that a standard telephone pole is 40' and conditional use permit is not required for these poles. In developing the ordinance; staff reviewed ordinances from a number of different cities. The height limits for exempted structures ranged from 15' to whatever the height limit is for a specific zoning district, with several ordinances using a height limit of 35'. Staff continues to recommend 35'. A standard of 35' is, closer to the height of light poles and the trend is toward requiring the undergrounding of utilities (i.e., the elimination of telephone poles) . File: 1899 PC Meeting: 10/12/00 Agenda Item No. 6 City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission Staff Report ty of-Rohnert Park repealing the existing Chapter Project Description An Ordinance of the Ci 17.64, . Wireless Communication Facilities, to the Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) and adding a new Chapter 17.64; Communication Facilities, to the Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance). Location Citywide Applicant City of Rohnert Park G.P. Designation Varies Zoning Varies Background On June 27, 2000 the City Council adopted a 90 -day Urgency Ordinance directing the development of a Telecommunications Ordinance and prohibiting the issuance of encroachment permits for telecommunications purposes in the interim; The Telecommunications Ordinance was approved by the City Council on September 26, 2000. As a'co'MP anion to the Telecommunications Ordinance, the existing Wireless Communication Facilities regulations contained in Chapter 17.64 of the Zoning Ordinance have been revised -and updated to reflect current technologies and to address the aesthetic concerns with ancillary support equipment associated with both wireless and cable or fiber optic facilities. Staff Analysis A copy of both the proposed and the existing communication ordinances are attached. The changes indicated in the proposed ordinance are those that have been made since the ordinance was distributed to the telecommunication companies for review and comment. Although the proposed ordinance is similar to the existing Wireless Communication ordinance, it has been expanded to cover a wide range of communication. facilities including electromagnetic waves, light waves, radio frequencies and other types of signals (see definition of Communication Facility in the new ordinance). The exemptions and site development criteria also have been expanded to address new technologies (e.g., Direct TV) and to cover more thoroughly criteria relating to height, colors, materials, screening, and siting of antennas, poles, towers, and ancillary equipment. Section 17.64.040 describes how the ordinance is to be applied. Essentially, a conditional use permit is required for new communication facilities unless they are listed as an exemption in Section' 17.64.042 or they meet -all the criteria listed in Section 17.64.050, 17.64.052, and. 17.64.060. Section 17.64.042 exempts facilities that are placed so as not to be visible from the public right- of-way or other property unless located . on a building or structure of historic significance. File: 1899 PC Meeting: 10/12/00 Agenda Item No. 6 Generally, subject to specific criteria listed in each respective exemption, the exemptions include antenna structures that are one meter (39.37 inches) or less in diameter (e.g., Direct TV dishes), antenna structures two meters (78.74 inches) or less ' in diameter located in a commercial or industrial zone, antennas used solely to receive television broadcast transmission, and "HAM" radio transmission antennas that are within the height limits of a particular zoning district. Also exempted from the requirement for a conditional use permit would be all communication facilities that meet all applicable site development criteria, general development standards, and operation and maintenance standards The site development criteria address the spacing and collocation of facilities, the height, color, materials, screening, and siting of facilities, and the undergrounding of power lines to and within a communication site. Environmental Review Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial Study was preparedfor the project, evaluating all potential environmental impacts. On the basis of this Initial Study, a Negative Declaration was prepared for the project, finding that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment. Findings Recommended findings for approving the project are included in the attached resolution. Public Notification A public hearing notice denoting the time, date, and location of the proposal's hearing was published in the Press Democrat and the notice was posted pursuant to State Planning Law. Alternative Actions The following alternatives are available to the Commission: 1. Adopt the attached resolution recommending to the City Council approval of the Communication Facilities Ordinance as written or with modifications.. 2. Direct staff to prepare a resolution recommending to the City Council that the Communication Facilities Ordinance not be adopted. 4. Direct staff to further evaluate specific issues and postpone action on the Ordinance to a later date. Staff Recommendation Based on the analysis and findings of this report and the attached resolution, staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by motion adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2000-_, recommending approval of the revisions to the Zoning Ordinance as they relate to Communication Facilities. 2 File: 1899 PC Meeting: 10/12/00 Agenda Item No. 6 Respectfully Submitted, Nancy Kaufman Planning and Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2000-_ (draft Ordinance attached). 2. Rohnert Park MC Chapter.17.64, Wireless Communication Facilities 3. Initial Study 3 17.64.010-17.64.030 Chapter 17.64 p �l WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Sections: 17.64.010 Title. 17.64.020 Purpose and intent. 17.64.030 Definitions. 17.64.040 General. 17.64.050. General development standards. 17.64.060 Professional, commercial and industrial district development standards. 17.64.070 Residential districts. 17.64.080 Use permit review. and approval. 17.64.090 Exceptions. 17.64.100 Exemptions. 17.64.110 Remedies not exclusive. 17.64.120 Severability. 17.64.010 Title. This chapter shall be titled the Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance of the city of Rohnert Park. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). 17.64.020 Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of this chapter is to r 'establish development standards to regulate the placement and design of wireles communication transmission facilities so as to preserve the unique visual character of the city; to establish development standards which are consistent with federal law related to the development of wireless communication transmission facilities; to acknowledge the community benefit associated with the provision of wireless communication services within the city and to provide incentives for well designed and well placed facilities; and, to secure additional benefit from the facilities for the public by encouraging the leasing of publicly owned properties where feasible for the development of wireless communication facilities. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). "Antenna" means any system of poles, panels, rods, reflecting discs or similar devices used for the transmission or reception of radio frequency signals. "Collocation" means the location of two or more wireless communication facilities on a single support structure or otherwise sharing a common location. Collocation shall also -include the location of -wireless communication facilities with other facilities such as water tanks, light standards, and other utility facilities and structures. ' "Equipment cabinet" means a cabinet or structure used to house equipment associated with a wireless communication facility. 456 (Rohnert Park 1/97) 1 17.64.040-17.64.050 "Monopole' means a- single free-standing pole, post, or similar structure, used to support equipment associated with a single wireless communication facility. "Related equipment" means all equipment ancillary to the transmission. and reception of voice and data via radio frequencies. Such equipment may include, but is not limited to, cable, conduit and connectors. "Service provider" means any authorized provider of wireless communication services. "Wireless communication facility" means an unstaffed facility, generally consisting of antennas, and equipment cabinet or structure, and related equipment, which receives and/or transmits radio frequency signals_ . (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). 17.64.040 General. Wireless communication facilities may be allowed in all zoning districts within the city, subject to approval of a land use permit application and consistent with the development standards established under this chapter. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). 17.64.050 General development standards. The following development standards shall apply to the development of all new wireless communication facilities within the city of Rohnert Park: A. New wireless communication facilities shall be collocated with existing facilities and with other planned new facilities whenever feasible and aesthetically desirable. In addition, where feasible and aesthetically desirable, service providers are encouraged to collocate with other facilities such as water tanks, light standards, and other utility structures where the collocation is found to minimize the overall visual impact. In order to facilitate collocation, conditions of approval for land use permits for new facilities shall require all service providers to cooperate in the siting of equipment and antennas to accommodate the maximum number of operators at a given site where found to be feasible and aesthetically desirable. B. All ground mounted wireless communication equipment, antennas, poles or towers shall be of a minimum functional height. C. All equipment, antennas, poles or towers shall have a non -reflective finish and shall be painted or otherwise treated to minimize visual impacts. .D. All ground mounted equipment, antennas, poles, or towers shall be sited to be screened by existing development, topography, or vegetation, to. the extent feasible. Ground mounted facilities are encouraged to be located within areas where substantial screening by existing vegetation can be achieved. Additional new vegetation or other screening may be required as a condition of approval for the permit. 456-1 (Rohnert Park 1/97) 17 ,64.060 Prote sio rz 111,,. __ - the standards. In addition to the general development-standards, esslonaing development standards apply to properties within the city's prof, commercial and industrial districts. citys A. All proposed wireless communication facilities tS ustrial district shall be completelycreened professional, commercial- and ind 456-2 (Rohnert Park 1/97) 17.64.060 E_ Roof mounted equipment and antennas shall belocated ated .as far away as desirable from the edge of the building. .'Antennas feasible and aesthetically attached to a building shall be painted or otherwise treated to match the exterior of building or the antenna's background color. the g - F. Where feasible, the location of wireless communication facilities shall property or right -of- I s= publicly owned or controlled be encouraged to be located on pu y way., G. All use permit approvals for wireless communication transmission a five-year period. use pe may be verits sites shall be reviewed at the end of the extended administratively by the planning department p on fication the finding conditions of land use permit's continued compliance with under which the application was originallyappo approval approval with a wireless communication facility shall H. All equipment associated be removed within- thirty days of the discontinuation of the use and the site shall r In the service provider restored to its original preconstruction condition. addition, a notice of intent to vacate a site a minimum of thirty r� shall provide the city with For facilities to be located on public property, this days prior to the vacation. removal requirements shall be included within the terms of the lease. For owner shall be facilities to be located on private property, since the subject property of the equipment, the terms of private leases -.i ultimately responsible for removal are encouraged to include the equipment removal as, a provision of the lease. I. A wireless communication receiving the transmission facility shall not adversely affect the public health, peace, safety or welfare: J. For service providers who plan to establish multiple wireless is encouraged to , communication facilities within the city, the service provider apply for approval -of all facilities under a master use permit application: Under by the city as a single this approach, all proposed facilities may be acted upon application. K For proposed facilities which do not movedevelopmenttandards n findhats due to the contained. within this ordinance, if the planning act to the noncompliance, -the proposed facility may create a significant imp an independen party neighborhood, the planning commission may require of the applicant to confirm the radio frequency ne ds of the review at the expense applicant. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). 17 ,64.060 Prote sio rz 111,,. __ - the standards. In addition to the general development-standards, esslonaing development standards apply to properties within the city's prof, commercial and industrial districts. citys A. All proposed wireless communication facilities tS ustrial district shall be completelycreened professional, commercial- and ind 456-2 (Rohnert Park 1/97) 17.64.070 -17.64.090 - from the view of surrounding properties or otherwise not be generally perceptible. Screening may include designs such as locating the facility within attics, steeples, towers, behind and below parapets, or concealed within a new architectural addition to a building or structure which is architecturally compatible with the building. If a new architectural addition is proposed to accommodate a facility, then the project will be subject to all architectural reviews as provided by Section 17.40.040 of this code. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). 17 64 070 Residential districts. In addition to the general development standards, wireless communication facilities shall not be permitted in any residential districts unless exceptions are made as per Section 17.64.050 and complies to the following development standards: A. All facilities shall be substantially screened from the view of surrounding properties and the public view or collocated with existing facilities or structures so as not to create.a substantial additional visual, noise, or thermal impact. Antennas are encouraged to be located within areas where substantial screening by existing vegetation can be achieved. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). 17 64 080 Use permit review and approval. Review and approval of use permit applications for wireless communication receiving and transmission facilities as required under this section are as follows: A. For all city professional, commercial and industrial zoning districts, if a proposed facility is found to be consistent with.all development standards contained within this section, the use permit may be approved administratively upon notification to property owners within a three hundred foot radius of the proposed site. B. For proposed facilities within the city's professional, commercial and industrial zoning districts, any proposed facility which requires an exception from any provision of this section, the application shall require review and approval by the planning commission during a noticed public hearing as provided in Chapter 17.52 of this code as per Section 17.52.070 of this code. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). A. Any proposed wireless communication receiving and transmitting facility which is not consistent with the development standards contained within this chapter, shall require approval of a variance or exception by the planning commission during a noticed public hearing. B. The planning commission may grant a variance or exception to waive any provision of this ordinance where found necessary to allow for the adequate 456.3 (R.ohnert Park 1/97) 17.64.100-17.64.120 development of facilities to serve all areas within the city and that the findings set forth. in Section 17.54.100 can be made. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). A. The planning director may find that certain types of wireless communication facilities and systems are. exempt from the requirements of this section and do not require use permit approval. Exempt facilities shall include private non-commercial wireless communication systems or facilities which are contained entirely on-site for the purpose of serving the premises. on the site and having no potential visual, noise, thermal or radio frequency interference on surrounding properties. As to any other exempt facilities, the planning director shall prepare a list of facilities that are considered to .be exempt, or in the alternative list, the standards by which an exemption will be granted. Such determination shall be reviewed and approved by the city council. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). 17 64110 Remedies not exclusive. The remedies in this article are not exclusive. The city may rely on any remedy authorized by law. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). 17,64,120 Severability. The city council hereby declares that every section, paragraph, sentence; clause and phrase is. severable. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this article is for any reason found to be invalid or unconstitutional, such valid or constitutionality shall not affect the validity or unconstitutionality of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases. (Ord. 626 §2 (part), 1997). 4564 (Rohnert Park V.97) 9 (i r "r Initial Study Proposed Amendments to Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance Applicant: Application No.: Date:. Lead Agency: Initial Study Prepared by: Review Period: City of Robnert Park 1899 September 13, 2000 City of Robnert Park 6750 Commerce Boulevard Robnert Park, CA 94928 Ron Bendorff Associate Planner September 20, 2000 to October 9, 2000 Project Description and Setting Project Title: Proposed Amendments to Wireless Communications Facility Ordinance Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rohnert Park, 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486 - Contact Person and Phone Number: Ron Bendorff, (707) 588-2231 Project Location: Citywide Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Rohnert Park, 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486 General Plan Designation (2000): N/A Zoning: N/A Description of Project: Proposed amendments to Section 17.64 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code regarding wireless communications facilities. The proposed. amendments would replace the existing wireless communications facilities ordinance with a revised ordinance, intended to regulate the placement and design of all communication facilities. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required: none Determination: It has been determined that the project is discretionary in nature and is not otherwise exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to .CEQA Guidelines Section 15051, "Criteria for Identifying the Lead Agency," it is further determined that the City of Rohnert Park is the appropriate lead agency for this project. This Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the State Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Nancy H. Kaufman Planning :and Community Development Director For City of Rohnert Park 9'--/3 -CC Date Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 1 09/13/00 Environmental Checklist and Supporting Information 1. AESTHETICS Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? c. Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated X X X a -c: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any visual impacts in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development.. The intent of the ordinance is to minimize the visual impact of communication facilities. throughout the City, which would be a beneficial. impact. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 2 09/13/00 1. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES a -c: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not impact any agricultural lands in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 3 09/13/00 Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Would the project: Mitigation Incorporated a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, X or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Progr of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for X agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C. Involve other changes in the existing X environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use? a -c: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not impact any agricultural lands in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 3 09/13/00 3. AIR QUALITY, Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of X the applicable air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute X substantially to an existing or projected air . quality violation? C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net X increase of any criteria air pollutant for whic the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial X pollutant concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a X substantial number of people? ' a -e: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any air quality impacts in. and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 4 09/13/00 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Would the project: Mitigation Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either X directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? III c. Have a substantial adverse effect on X federally -protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of X any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances X protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted X Habitat Conservation.Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 5 09%13/00 a — f.: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any impacts on biological resources in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES Potentially I Potentially I Less Than No Impact Significant Impact Significant Significant Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the X significance of historical resources as defined in CEQA Section 15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the X significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Section 15064.5? C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those X interred outside of formal cemeteries? a— d: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any impacts to cultural resources in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 6 _ 09/13/00 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS a -d: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any impacts related to geology and soils 'in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 7 09/13/00 Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Would the project: Mitigation Incorporated a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as X delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a know fault? ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including X liquefaction? iv) Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss X of topsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is X unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in X Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building.Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? a -d: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any impacts related to geology and soils 'in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 7 09/13/00 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Would the project: a. - Create a significant hazard to the public or X the environment through the 'routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or X the environment ,through reasonably - foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C. Emit hazardous emissions or handle X hazardous or acutely -hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or.proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a X list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. Impair implementation of or physically X interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? f. Expose people or structures to a significant X risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? a — f: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any impacts related to hazardous materials in and of themselves. Projects subject to -the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 8 09/13/00 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project: Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant. Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated a. Violate any water quality standards or waste X discharge requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or X interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local Rroundwater table level? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantially additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect floo flows? X X X KI Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 9 09/13/00 X KIN a -h: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any hydrology and water quality impacts in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 10 09/13/00 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the proJect: a. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance or any specific plan) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? b. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? c. Physically divide an established community? a -c: Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated X ►a X The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any land use and planning impacts in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 11 09/13/00 10. MINERAL RESOURCES Potentially Significant Impact Would the project: Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known X mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- X important mineral resource iecovery site delineated by the General Plan, a specific plan or other land use plan? M711 The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any impacts related to mineral resources in and of themselves. Projects subject to the.revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. 11. NOISE Would the project result in: a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? C. A substantial'permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 12 11 Potentially. Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated X X X X 09/13/00 a -d: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any noise impacts in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 13 09/13/00 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project: a. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes or businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers 'of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated 1 X X X. a -c: The proposed amendmentsare not site specific and therefore would not create any impacts on population and housing in and of themselves. ..and subject to the revised. ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior. to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 14 _ 09/13/00 13. PUBLIC SERVICES Would thero ect result in substantial Potentially P Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant No Impact adverse physical impacts associated with the Impact Unless Impact provision of new or physically -altered Mitigation Incorporated governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically -altered. governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts in order to maintain acceptable service ratios; response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: a. Fire and police protection? X b. Schools? X c. Other public facilities? X a -c: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any impacts on public services in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 15 09/13/00 • .r r 14. RECREATION Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated. a. Would the project increase theuse of existing X neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational X facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a -b: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any impacts on recreational facilities in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 16 09/13/00 15. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC a -g: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any transportation or traffic impacts in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 17 09/13/00 Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Would thero ect: P Mitigation Incorporated a. Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial X in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., X sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? c. Inadequate emergency access or access to X nearby uses? d. Insufficient parking or capacity on-site or X off-site? e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or X bicyclists? f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting X alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? X a -g: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any transportation or traffic impacts in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 17 09/13/00 16. UTLITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Would the project: Incorporated a. Result in a determination by the wastewater X treatment provider that serves the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Require or result in the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? b. Require or result in the construction of new X storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C. Require new or expanded entitlement or X resources for water supplies? d. Be served by a landfill with insufficient X permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? e. Conflict with federal, state, or local statutes X and regulations related to hazardous waste disposal? a -e: The proposed amendments are not site specific and therefore would not create any impacts on utilities in and of themselves. Projects subject to the revised ordinance would require supplemental environmental review prior to development. Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 18 09/13/00 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated a. Does the project have the potential to de- X grade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare of endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the'major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are X individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects; the effects of other current projects, and the effects .of probable future projects.) c. Does the -project have environmental effects X that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a. Refer to Section 4, Biological Resources. b. The proposed amendments would not impact any existing or presently planned projects. c. This Initial Study has not identified any potentially -significant, adverse impacts: Other Information Sources City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code Wireless Communications Ordinance Page 19 09/13/00 1- " RESOLUTION NO. 2000-236 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DECLARING RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION AND MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ON NOVEMBER 7, 2000 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park, Sonoma County, California, that: WHEREAS, a Consolidated General Election and Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Rohnert Park on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, as required by law; and WHEREAS, it appears that notice of said election was duly and, legally given, that voting precincts were properly established, that election officers were appointed and election supplies famished, that in all respects said election was held and conducted and the votes cast thereat received and canvassed and the, returns thereof made, determined and declared in the time, form and manner as required by the General Laws of the State providing for and regulating municipal elections in said City; and WHEREAS; the Council of the City of Rohnert Park met at the regular meeting place of said Council on Tuesday, December 12, 2000 to review and adopt the canvass of the returns of said election and install the newly electedofficers; and WHEREAS, said canvass was duly completed and the results thereof are as hereinafter set forth. 1. That said consolidated general election and municipal election was held and conducted in the City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, State of California, on Tuesday, November 7, 2000 in the time and in the form and manner as required by law. 2. That a canvass of the votes cast in said City for the office of City Council was duly performed by the Office of the Sonoma County Clerk and Registrar of Voters in accordance, with law and transmittal for same constituting certification 'of the Official Canvass. for adoption by the, governing body of the City of Rohnert Park was received by the City on November 30, 2000. 3. That the total number of votes cast in said City of Rohnert Park at said election was 15,500. (includes 3,579 absentee votes). 4. That the names of the persons voted for, the number of votes received by each said persons in - said precincts, together with the whole number of votes which they received in the entire city, are as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, being a Statement of the Votes by Eeve T. Lewis, Sonoma County Clerk and Registrar of Voters. 5. That at said consolidated general election and municipal election held in the City of Rohnert Park on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, the following persons were elected to the following offices, respectively: Jake Mackenzie, Linda Spiro and Vicki Vidak-Martinez were elected as members of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park for the term of four (4) years, from and after Tuesday, December 12, 2000 and until their successors shall have been duly elected and qualified. 6. That the City Clerk of the City of Rohnert Park is hereby directed to fill out, execute and deliver to each of the persons elected a Certificate of Election signed by him and duly authenticated. He shall also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California. Citv of Rohnert Park Resolution No. 2000-236 (Page 2 of 2) 7. That the City of Rohnert Park Measure N was presented to the voters of the City to determine whether it should be passed, with the Measure stating as follows: "Shall the voters of Rohnert Park amend the General Plan to make the Urban Growth Boundary effective for 20 years so as to prevent urban sprawl, protect community separators, preserve agricultural land and open space, and control the amount and rate of growth to conform to the new General Plan; be spread evenly over 20 years, and provide that no change can be made to the Urban Growth Boundary measure unless approved by the voters?" 8. That the City of Rohnert, Park Measure N presented to the voters of the City at its consolidated general election and municipal election on November 7, 2000 was approved and passed by the voters by the following results: NO 4,249 and YES 10,274 ; and that the results are hereby approved and adopted. 9. That the City of Rohnert Park Measure O was presented to the voters of the City to determine where it should be passed, with said Measure stating as follows: "Without increasing taxes, 'shall private sponsors with government assistance be allowed to develop, construct, or acquire low=rent housing subject to these conditions: Authorized units shall not exceed four percent of units in the City; No more than' 15 percent of the units shall be located in any 'Section (A through S) or specific plan area; Twenty percent of the units shall be reserved for elderly or ' disabled households; The authorization shall expire November 8, 2020. 10, That the City of Rohnert Park Measure, 0 presented to the voters of the City at its consolidated general election and municipal election on November 7, 2000 was approved and passed by the voters by the following results: NO 6,504 and YES 7,462 ; and that the results are hereby approved and adopted. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 12th day of December; 2000. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST: Approved as to form: Deputy City Clerk C Attorne FLORES: _ MACKENZIE: _ REILLY: _ SPIRO: _ VIDAK-MARTINEZ: _ AYES: _ NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JH -h:121200 Resolution Declaring Results of Election EEVET.LEWIS COUNTY CLERK " REGISTRAR OF VOTERS /j = EX -OFFICIO CLERKBOARDOF SUPERVISORS3 S`�RA��DFYVO'T`ERS ,.435 FISCv,DgIVE SAN�+4IOSk, CA%.95403; r > ............::k:::r ..�: NOV .... of pARx M E M O R A N D U DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 2000 P.O. BOX 11485 SANTA ROSA, CA 95406-1485 (707) 565-6800 (800) 750 VOTE C0 TDD (707) 565-6888 M/ C�C,�• 07) 565-6843 ��UtiNE0US TD - TO: JURISDICTIONS PARTICIPATING IN THE NOVEMBER 7, 2000moo CONSOLIDATED ENERAL ELECTION vi - FROM.• fT,� 'COUNTY CLERK & REGISTRAR OF VOTERS RE: OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST Enclosed please find the Official Statement of Votes Cast for your jurisdiction's contest(s) voted upon arthe November 7, 2000 Consolidated General Election. This transmittal constitutes certification of the Official Canvass for adoption by your jurisdiction's governing body. Copies of the Statement of Votes Cast will be available for sale in our office. Copies include all contests which were on the ballot November 7, 2000. As we are not able to break out individual jurisdictions, you may wish to consider making copies of the enclosed certification available to your candidates and/or interested citizens. Also enclosed, for School and Special Districts, . are the Certificates of Election and Oaths of Office for newly elected board members. Elective officers, elected or appointed pursuant to E. C. §10554 and Edi C:, §5017, take .office at noon on the first Friday in December (December 1, 2000) next following the general district election. Prior to taking office, each elective officer shall take the official oath and execute any bond required by the principal act. Please send a signed copy -of the Certificates of Election and Oaths; of Office to the Registrar of Voters Office, P. 0. - Box 11485, Santa Rosa, CA 95406.' Should you have any questions in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact me at 565-2583, or Janice Atkinson, Assistant Registrar of Voters, at 565-6814. S. IelectionElection DataW0110710ERTPAGES..wpd STATEMENT OF THE VOTES �10�L 3 � 2004 Cly OF ROFirdRRT PARK CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION CAST AT THE HELD ON NOVEMBER 7, 2000 COUNTY OF SONOMA STATE OF CALIFORNIA I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )ss. COUNTY OF SONOMA ) I, EEVE T. LEWIS, COUNTY CLERK of said county, do hereby certify the following to be a true and correct copy of the Statement of the Votes Cast at the CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION held on November 7, 2000, for the candidates and measures herein set forth. Witness my han ffi al this 22nd day of November, 2000. �`�' 0�� EEVE T. LEWIS, COUNTY C ERK —COUNTY ONOMA 0,� �q coUN�� A 11/22/00 127 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION, NOVEMBER 7, 2000 028 MEMBER, ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL R 0 h n Me V er i mt c b T k eP h i ra -r 0 m J V k a a J i R B C P s k 0 d E A i a L e S J h a G L t o i R h a n k I L y L n M a m - S 0 d W a u e F M T T T CE S a 0 c n s a R S u 01 t 0 k H r A R ue u S d e K K u t T C N nc t p c n i L d i I A 0 ct r 1 0 z L i s n 0 S u i u r c i a n 0 e N T T L3 d 0 k e t e n z 2601 -PCT 2601 59 37 62. 9 144 4 15 81891 4 2001 2602 -PCT 2602 79 451 56. 6 171 7 135 5 1 18 -PCT 1 1 10 2605 -MB CT 2605 66 2607 -PCT 2607 621 33 53. 71 12 1 15 8 6 5 13 -PCT 6 3601 -PCT 3601 10 66 7 55. 8 1 14 32 3 16 8 8 5 16 --3602-PCT 3602 3603 -PCT 3603 79 51 64. 0 131 14 17 2 5 24 15 6 13 12 9 2 19 -PCT 3605 -PCT 3605 50 31 62. 9 8 1 11 41 0 2 1335 1 8 6 8 14 -PCT 36U6 3607 -PC 3607 4.5 69 38 55. 5 15 1 14 54 8 5 6 1 _PCT 3608 3609 -PCT 3609 66 41 25 61. 1 169 7 1 1 2 1 1 111 -PCT 3611 -PCT 3611 81 46 57 12 1 18 1 31 231 14 8 6 25 PCT 3613 3613- 73 421 57. 19 16 3 2 01 10 5 19 -PCT 3614 3615- CT 3615 9 73 44 61 10 23a 15 4� 283 .3 23 151 6 6 23 -PCT6 6 3617 -PCT 3617 71 34 48. 7 13 3 141 7 4 3 .16 -PCT 3619 -PCT 3619 84 51 60� 10 19 4 245 18 8 8 1 51 24 3622 -PCT 3622 441 24 55.1 5 9 21 10 4 4 2 10 00 601 -ABS PCT 8002601 59 8 14. 9 2 17-1 4 4 2 1 1 232 6 -ABS PCT 002603- BS PCT 8002603 5 6 12. 1 2 28 1 2 -ABS PCT 00 606 -ABS PCT 8002606 95 16 16 3 6 8 3 1 2 8 002 -ABS PCT 002608 A S PCT 8002608 110 1 15 1 4 7 4 1 .2 11 51 2 3 8 -ABS PCT 003602 -ABS PCT 8003602 78 17 2 4 144 7 9 1 5 9 -ABS PCT 003604-A S PCT 8003604 66 1 171 -ABS PCT 003606 -ABS CT 8003606 43 71 16. 1 3 29� 34! 1 1 6 -ABS PCT 8003607 003608 -ABS PCT 8003608 661 10 15 21 69 4 1( 5 1 11 E1 2 1 4 8.. - -ABS PCT 003610 -ABS PCT 8003610 85 13 15 31 6 6_ -ABS PCT 003612 -ABS PCT 8003612 54 81 1 2 9 4 9 3 2 4 -ABS PCT 003614 -ABS PC7 8003614 9 19 0 1 4 9 1 9 6 3 3 111 -ABS PCT 003616- S PCT 8003616 79 14 18 5 6 1 66 5 1 21 5 ABS PCT 003618 -ABS PCT 8003618 86 16 19 5 9 6 71 11 �4 2 3 1 8 -ABS PCT 003 0- S PCT 8003620 95 4 S. 8 1 11 9 31 4 11 -ABS PCT 3003623 -ABS PCT 8003623 82 15 18. 3 6 11 60 4 2 2 24 9 S OTA 2031 357 17 86 1581 30 1644 96 50 53_ 184. GRAND TO ALS 1�1 481 11/22/00 192 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION, NOVEMBER 7, 2000 "" 3 MEASURE N/0 ROHNERT PARK URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING M. M e e a a sU s ur u rb r ea eA n f N Of G 0 -r -r 0 d R B Rw Ra E A of ob'� G L hh hl I L n ne• S 0 eB e T J T ro rH R S U to to A R n u T C N Pd Ps I A 0 as Y ai Y 0 S U rr e N rn e N N T T ky s 0 kg s 0 2601 -PCT 2601 59 37 62. 23 10 1 15 2602 -PCT 2602 79 451 56 29 11 2 11 -PCT2603 52 34g 66 22E 93 183-- 2605 -MB PCT 2605 66. 2 2 1 -PCT 2607 -PCT 2607 621 33 53. 22 8 16 12 -PCT26UB 110 69 45 --30� 321 3601 -PCT 3601 --3602 66 37 5 22 121 18 14 -PCT 8 141 z 3603 -PCT 3603 79 51 64� 315 169 25 20 -PCT 3604 667 0 3605 -PCT 3605 503 1 62 0 8 17 10 606 -PCT 3606 437 zil � 531 141 3607 -PCT 3607 69 38 55 23 101 22 9 -PCT 61 1 3609 -PC 3609 41 5 61. 1 4 15 7 -PCT16lU 852 4 5.4 30 23� 160 3611 -PCT j2121 81 46 57 30 13 20 21 PCT 54C 327 213 15� 14 3613 -PC 3613 73 421 57. 29 10 21 16 -PCT3614 97; 555 56 36S 13S 259 3615 -PCT 361 73 44 61 29 13 18 221 -PCT 20 3617 -PCT 3617 71 34 48:1 24 6 21 9 -PCT 3619- CT 3619 84 51 60: 33 15 1 5 -PCT .36ZO 95E 56 —SiX 14E 231 28 3622 -PC 36 441 4 16 . 5 13 72 -PCT3623 82� 47 30 131 002601 -ABS PCT 8002601 59 8 14. 2 4 3 -ABS PCT 9 002603 -ABS PCT 8002603 52 6 4 1 31 1 -ABS PCT 002606 -ABS CT 8002606 5 161 16� 1 41 71 7 -ABS PC62 002608- BS T 8002608 110 16 14. 10 4 6 9 81 -ABS PCT661. 00360 - BS P T 8003602 78 17 22. 1 5 7 9 -ABS PCT79 1 003604 -ABS PCT 8003604 66 11 17:1 3 5 4 -ABS PCT 6 0 lg 003606- BS 8003606 43 6 4 1 3 2 -ABS PCT 12 1825 3 003608 -ABS PCT 8003608 661 10 15� 3 3 ABS PCT 8003609 41 12 29 003610 -ABS PCT 8003610 85 13 15� 9 2 6 - �63 -ABS PCT 003612 -ABS PC 8003612 54 81 5 2 3 3 ABS PCT 003614 ABS PCT 8003614 97 19 0�1 13 5 10 8 -ABS PCT8003615 13A 19 003616 -ABS _ 8003616 79 14 9 3N 61 -ABS PCT 003618- BS CT 8003618 86 1 19 11 4 -ABS PCT 51 5 003620 ABS CT 8003620 95 4 5� 6 9 3 -ABS PCT36 003623 -ABS PCT 8003623 824 1 0 3 ABSENTEE TOTALS 2031E 357e 17.6 2394991 1712 1583 GRAND TOTALS-2113TE —13-4W —76—.3 —10274 424 7462 504 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 7, 2000 STATEMENT OF WRITE-IN VOTES CAST ui U) N 0 0 2 U 0 o cu o CL L) Q..c a) '2 .2 N> 0 co IL 0 a) U) w 03 4T r3 J' Y 'AV7 2602 108 2603 1 2606 2 -5E 3601 3 3601 AV 4 3602 5 -7 Ir P? 3604 AV 2 3606 7 3606 AV 2 Z6g -gq 4 5," 3608 AV 3609 170 3609 AV 76 ry Qv'. x 3611 AV 2 3612 AV 1 3613 8 3f iv 3615 15 3615 AV 4 3616 4 13618 AV 23 W-1 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 7, 2000 STATEMENT OF WRITE-IN VOTES CAST N cn 0 0 'a U a) r 0 cu cn -6 2i ami If '2 .2 6 a) ca cn c > = c: r-0 ca M Q) 0 a) a) -0 4 In LU 3619 10 3619 AV lv 3623 AV 84 5033 AV 5701 20 2,u 5703 18 5703 AV 3 5704 23 7— % T U 5706 28 5706 AV 11 Absentee Totals 1 226 63 Grand Totals 2 689 227 mm