2002/12/19 City Council Agenda PacketCity of Rohnert Park* 6756 Commerce Boulevard+Rohnert Park, California 94928
Phone: (707)588-2227 ♦ FAX: (707)588-2274 ♦ WEB: www.gwity.org
ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING for GOAL SETTING
AGENDA
December 19, 2002
5:00 p.m.
Special Session - Open
Call to Order
Roll Call (Flores Mackenzie Nordin Spradlin _ Vidak-Martinez
Unscheduled public appearances:
For public comment on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time (limited to
3-5 minutes per person, or allocation of time based on number of speaker cards submitted,
not to exceed a 30 minute total time limit) - Public comments for Special Meetings are
restricted to items listed on the agenda. [G.C.54954.3(a)]
5:05 p.m.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the consent calendar will be considered in toto by one action of
the Council unless any Councilmember or anyone else interested in any matter
on the consent calendar has a question about same.
A. Acknowledging the City Manager/Clerk's report on the posting
of the meeting's agenda
B. Approval of Bills/Demands for Payment concurrently for:
• City of Rohnert Park/City Council
• Community Development Commission
C. Accepting Casb/Investments Report for Month End,
October 31, 2002 concurrently for:
• City of Rohnert Park/City Council
• Community Development Commission
• Rohnert Park Financing Authority
D. City Resolutions for Adoption:
2002-272
Endorsing the Rohnert Park Boys and Girls Club Sonoma County
Community Development Block Grant Application
2002-273
Endorsing the Committee on the Shelterless (COTS) Sonoma
County Community Development Block Grant Application
2002-274
Endorsing the Rebuilding Together Rohnert Park Sonoma County
Community Development Block Grant Application
2002-275
Authorizing and Approving an Agreement with Ms. Toni Bertolero
of Winzler & Kelly, Consulting Engineers, for the Appointment as
Interim City Engineer
2002-27
ut o—fizmg City Manager/City Attorney to Draft Appropriate
Documents to Memorialize Option No. 1 as Outlined in Sonoma
County Wineries Association Letter of December 6, 2002
City of Rohnert Park CONCURRENT MEETINGS Agenda (2) - SPECIAL MEETING - December 19, 2002
for City Council/Community Development Commission/RohnertPark FtnancingAuthorUy/Rohnert Park Dlshzct
D. City Resolutions for Adoption: (con't)
2002-277 Approval of a Purchase Agreement between the City of Rohnert Park and
the Community Development Commission to Purchase 450 City Hall Drive
2002-278 Approval of an Agreement between the Community Development
Commission and the City of Rohnert Park to Provide Improvements to
Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park to Preserve the Stock of Affordable
Housing Within the Redevelopment Project Area
E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION matters:
CDC Resolutions for Adoption:
2002-11 Approval of a Purchase Agreement between the City of Rohnert Park and
the Community Development Commission to Purchase 450 City Hall Drive
2002-12 Approval of Development Agreement and Security Agreement between the
- - Community Development Commission and Burbank Housing for the
Purpose of Developing Affordable Housing at 450 City Hall Drive
2002-13 Approval of an Agreement between the Community Development
Commission and the City of Rohnert Park to Provide Improvements to
Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park to Preserve the Stock of Affordable
Housing Within the Redevelopment Project Area
2002-14 Approval of Pre -Development Agreement between Mercy Housing of
California to Develop Affordable Housing at the Southwest Shopping
Center in Compliance with the City's General Plan and Housing Element
2002-15 Approval of a Pre -Development Agreement with Burbank Housing for a
Scattered Site Housing Development within the Redevelopment Project Area
2002-16 Approval of an Affordable Housing Development Agreement with Kisco for
the Wellness Center Site
5:10 p.m.
2. GOAL SETTING - Council consideration of goal setting objectives as follows:
Council Goals for 2003
Question: What do we want to accomplish?
CLOSED SESSION - COUNCIL, WILL MEET IN CLOSED SESSION IN THE
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE AFTER THE SPECIAL MEETING TO CONSIDER:
• Personnel matters (G.C. 54957)
ADJOURNMENT no later than 8:00 p.m.
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other
pEr onto—assists ng- p]eaSe ••sweet the City Offims at
(707) 588-2227 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation by
the City. Please make sure the City Manager's office is notified as soon as possible if you have a visual
impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another format (Braille, audio -tape, etc.)
JH-h:agenda\121902 AGENDA -SPECIAL MEETING for GOAL SETTING
NOTICE OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR HOLDING A
CLOSED MEETING of the CITY COUNCIL of the
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
December 19, 2002
LOCATION: City Manager's Office at City Hall, 6750 Commerce Blvd.,
Rohnert Park, Ca.
TIlVIE: 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the listed agenda
item for the closed session is reached
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54950 et.sey., the -
City Council will hold a closed session. More specific information
regarding this meeting is provided as follows:
*Personnel matters (G.C. 54957)
Include names/titles of City staff &/or consultants in attendance
- Review of evaluation of City Attorney and City Manager
M eer/City Clerk
Attachment to:
City of Rohnert Park
City Council Agenda
Dec. 19, 2002
JH-h:agenda/ 1219o2ag
CITY COUNCII. SPEAKER CARD
mme: ( �/�fk1ress
: /- ��
tone: S8 5`'S Y7 7.
0PIC: S sggL,
%
rief Summary of Comments:
L 5`3sS�,�dw�
61,
14p` CIO Gfly� See Reverse
4
CITY COUNCII. SPEAKER CARD
Date:
Addreiec 8 Sjv �D d2F1`1J� ►-� b�
Phone: 7 �7 45`SzZs
TOPIC: M I/t E-Vm
Brief Summary of Comments:
j1 pyS�
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
nate: � / ?L(l) � Date:
ime:r �/� . Name:?{,-N-'gl4
idress: lQ l� I Address: 8 jy J7 0 OzFI'11� �( b
lone: � `�—S �7 7. �Phone: 7 ��
�gs�s'Zzs
OPIC: �S� o �3 S Sod Q�3z,,�`0,�" TOPIC: 10/6 VM
rief Summary of Comments: Ct . Brief Summary of Comments:
e�
5 512
12
r�f� -tg h
VD y'(
�p S zrri^ �C [%e �!!�/d � See Reverse V See Reverse
Q
City of Rohnert Park* 6750 Commerce Boulevard* Rohnert Park, California 94928
Phone: (707)588-2227*FAX: (707)588-2274+WEB: wwv.rpcity.org
ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING for GOAL SETTING
AGENDA
December 19, 2002
5:00 p.m.
Special Session - Open
Call to Order
Roll Call (Flores Mackenzie_ Nordin Spradlin _ Vidak-Martinez_)
Unscheduled public appearances:
For public comment on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time (limited to
3-5 minutes per person, or allocation of time based on number of speaker cards submitted,
not to exceed a 30 minute total time limit) - Public comments for Special Meetings are
restricted to items listed on the agenda. [G.C.54954.3(a)]
5:05 p.m.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the consent calendar will be considered in toto by one action of
the Council unless any Councilmember or anyone else interested in any matter
on the consent calendar has a question about same.
A. Acknowledging the City Manager/Clerk's report on the posting
of the meeting's agenda
B. Approval of Bills/Demands for Payment concurrently for:
• City of Rohnert Park/City Council
• Community Development Commission
C. Accepting Cash/Investments Report for Month End,
October 31, 2002 concurrently for:
• City of Rohnert Park/City Council
• Community Development Commission
• Rohnert' Park Financing Authority
D. City Resolutions for Adoption:
2002-272
Endorsing the Rohnert Park Boys and Girls Club Sonoma County
Community Development Block Grant Application
2002-273
Endorsing the Committee on the Shelterless (COTS) Sonoma
County Community Development Block Grant Application
2002-274
Endorsing the Rebuilding Together Rohnert Park Sonoma County
Community Development Block Grant Application
2002-275
Authorizing and Approving an Agreement with Ms. Toni Bertolero
of Winzler & Kelly, Consulting Engineers, for the Appointment as
Interim City Engineer
2002-276
Authorizing City Manager/City Attorney to Draft Appropriate
Documents to Memorialize Option No. 1 as Outlined in Sonoma
County Wineries Association Letter of December 6, 2002
City of Rohnert Park CONCURRENT MEETINGS Agenda (2) - SPECIAL MEETING - December 19, 2002
for City CounciUCommunity Development CommissionJRohnert Park Financing Authority/Rohnert Park District
D. City Resolutions for Adoption: (con't)
2002-277 Approval of a Purchase Agreement between the City of Rohnert Park and
the Community Development Commission to Purchase 450 City Hall Drive
2002-278 Approval of an Agreement between the Community Development
Commission and the City of Rohnert Park to Provide Improvements to
Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park to Preserve the Stock of Affordable
Housing Within the Redevelopment Project. Area
E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION matters:
CDC Resolutions for Adoption:
2002-11 Approval of a Purchase Agreement between the City of Rohnert Park and
the Community Development Commission to Purchase 450 City Hall Drive
2002-12 Approval of Development Agreement and Security Agreement between the
Community Development Commission and Burbank Housing for the
Purpose of Developing Affordable Housing at 450 City Hall Drive
2002-13 Approval of an Agreement between the Community Development
Commission and the City of Rohnert Park to Provide Improvements to
Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park to Preserve the Stock of Affordable
Housing Within the Redevelopment Project Area
2002-14 Approval of Pre -Development Agreement between Mercy Housing of
California to Develop Affordable Housing at the Southwest Shopping
Center in Compliance with the City's General Plan and Housing Element
2002-15 Approval of a Pre -Development Agreement with Burbank Housing for a
Scattered Site Housing Development within the Redevelopment Project Area
2002-16 Approval of an Affordable Housing Development Agreement with Kisco for
the Wellness Center Site
5:10 p.m.
2. GOAL SETTING - Council consideration of goal setting objectives as follows:
Council Goals for 2003
Question: What do we want to accomplish?
CLOSED SESSION - COUNCIL WILL MEET IN CLOSED SESSION
AFTER THE SPECIAL MEETING TO CONSIDER:
• Personnel matters (G.C. 54957)
- Evaluation of performance of City Attorney and City Manager
ADJOURNMENT no later than 8:00 p.m.
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other
person to assist you while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City Offices at
(707) 588-2227 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation by
the City. Please make sure the City Manager's office is notified as soon as possible if you have a visual
impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another format (Braille, audio -tape, etc.)
JH-h:agenda\121902 AGENDA -SPECIAL MEETING for GOAL SETTING
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
BILLS FOR APPROVAL
December 19, 2002
Hand Check Numbers 130008-130024
Dated December 4-12, 2002 $182,263.17
Computer Check Numbers 130025-130262
Dated December 13, 2002 $275,992.65
Subtotal $458,255.82
Stacy & Witbeck
Rohnert Park Railroad Crossing, Project No. 1995-07 $45,471.38
Subtotal $45,471.38
TOTAL 1 $503,727.20
)B ID VALUE S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARD
SME 11:15 DEMAND LIST
M A S DATE 1-S-7TTr37
—CH—K#-----V E1N'L7O"-/1N-A-M FIEEC't rOTW
130008
09736
BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA
77,716.34
130009
10061
CA MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS
10.00
�D
00325
KAISER FOUNDA-ITON
. 7E
130011
00325
KAISER FOUNDATION
34,689.72
130012
12063
NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION
5,377.12
13-0'0
N"A t`T-O WAt—D F E R R ECPENSA M Oi IV
130014
00363
ROHNERT PARK PEACE OFFICERS
3,817,50
130015
003`23
UNITED WAY
303.25
—1-3-T" 6
u u c4
REDUOTM7-CREui_
130017
00364
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTL. UNION!
889.31
130018
09254
CITY OF *ROHNERT PARK
615.00
-
q ' -E C tJ JT1'� A S 50"C T�#-N
i-2-0-0-0-
1300210
06592
ACTOR'S EQUITY ASSOCIATION
99.80
130021
00325
KAISER FOUNDATION
6,929.59
—1
32 t3M1� E#S=S TEi� T
? 5,015-0
130023
12563
ROHNERT PARK DISPOSAL
24,321.71
130024
09068
CA APPLICANT EXPEDITE SVC
84.00
----t-3-9x0
,9-45
. L -D :_ 'MMP -X N --r`N
54? 9
130051
09134
ACCOUNT€MPS
7,505.28
130 052
07842
AM PRINTING COMPANY
395.38
0053
7S7�M205.70
130054
00017
AMERI-CRAFT
99.51
130055
06996
ANIMAL CARE CENTER OF SONOMA
100.00
�i371 {YSt�
5 -.6-1
130057
04477
WENDY *AUDISS.
161.85
13005,8
10447
AVAYA
1,801,18
-3-0-
"B -A -EC i4T-E-L-HU D-IS-"INZ —'C O NSCI M-rN
,
130060
11513
RON *BENDORFF
16.40
130061
08884
BERRYMAN & HENIGAR, INC.
2,814.68
X1-3v-001B%NK-:L-E1'-A-1A1ZM
S-970-0
130063
06433.
PAMELA *BRASHEARS
70.00
1`30064
13`088
BUCHANAN FOOD SERVICE
156.29
—1
6-- 0_0
130066
09886
C.J.M. PRODUCTIONS
139.50
130067
13333
CA ALCHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL
300.00
—13vT
-33"3"6—C-A:
P -U r- I C EMPLO-YERS-L-NBAYR
20.
130069
00059
CA WATER RESOURCES BOARD`
700.00
130070
13048
CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC
2,787.48
130072
08543
CENTRAL COAST POLYGRAPH INC.
150.00
130073
03476
DAWN *CERINI
20.00
13 74
_.3 3.32
'MFzRY GtiRFfi2ER
1 0"000
130075
13172
JOYCE Y :- *Ct ANG DMD
300.0.0
13.0076
00100
CHEVRON NATIONAL TRAVEL_ CARD
6,188.87
`---1 3"0 r
418
_ P GY BCH I -3`Et`E SK-
-4-4-. 0-0
130078
00103
CITY CLERKS ASSOC. OF CALIF.
210.00
130079
05527
CLONE DIGITAL PRINT & COPY
267.89
7-3
iNANETTE"-9-GO
I'-,- 0-0-
130081
10131
COMER ARCHITECTS
210.00
130082
06476
JOHN M. *CONNOL'P
300.00
13008:3
13012
CORE UTILITIES
926.25
130084
---1 0`0s_
1 034
e
COST PLUS WORLD MA°RKET
25.'94
130056
I
13302
TOM *DAMBLY
--9-1-
600.00
130087
08167
DAN'S SUPERIOR AUTO SERVICE.
757.51
-1-3 04
t _
G�TCV
630.00
130089
11886
DAYWIRELESS SYSTEMS
2,700.00
130090
11220
DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES
999.45
i 0-0-
0-
ROBERT- ENXEll
260.00
130092
05626
DIRECT MAILING SYSTEMS
477.60
130093
03993
DIVERSIFIED RISK
1,031.83
_ 1_3.009-4
08;`�DOt2Bt�E�[71=C
RICH' *HENRY
700
130095
11285
GERALDINE *DUNCANN
78.00
130096
00149
DUST-TEX SERVICES, INC.
1222.50
i
OS
-eM-B -SS Y -SU -I Tf
65-6-4
130098
10950
EXTRA TEAM
945.00
130099
08064
MICHELLE *FAHY
390.00
r-3-01-0
0 8
A -TR MK--�= F`A-4
35 0-0
130101
08108
FASTSIGNS
94.60
130102'
11345'
FISHER FRIE'DMAN ASSO/AIA
262.89
iO3
0-2 7 DAV-I-D--*1= R-NZ-eR
1-1-. 9-
130104
13335
FROGGY 92.9 KFGY FM
120.00
130105
11642
BOB *GALAGARAN
100.00
1-311
c ilS1�G 41r' P -0-R `SB -AR AND -RE..,
0-0-0
130107
10017
GIBLIN ASSOCIATES
3,386.50
130108
02029
GLOBAL DOCUGRAPHIX SCANNING
729.85
130110
00173
GRAINGER, INC.
34.99
130111
11241
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO
262.77
�T1-3-01
0-3
i-C-H-AEL-o-*-GRTC
26"-0
80-U-
130113
130113
08444
GROENIGER & COMPANY
156.20
130114
13306
DALE *GUTRIDG£
630.00
`+1-3Yit1
kNSEL_PO,IZ
55_9
130116
10991
TOR *HANSEN
600.00
130117
13312
NED *HARAN
550.00
-301-f-
1=1f R NGTt NEER-I1� i1U
427-. 0
130119
09345
LAWRENCE' D. *HE NIG, D.D.S.INC.
270.00
1301220
13307
RICH' *HENRY
630.00
-.p
R -T- E- UTP KE NT -'R E -NTA
2-4-55
130122
11074
HILTON FARNKOFF & HOBSON, LL>C
1,170.80
130123
02369
HILTON HOTEL
874.09
�1-T012 4
_ 1-12
H -O ENTG , 0
0 3 . u
130125
12355
JOSH *HOLDRIDGE
210.00
130126
06854
HOME DEPOT
626.31!
aNDA :p H
ter.
130128
03285
HSC ELECTRONIC SUPPLY
87.11
130129
07982
IDEAL COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.
2,608.56
-�t-3OJt:3
NTER-NA-.-REVEMk SE"
8--79 -
130131
13300
GARY *JOHNSON
630.00
130132
07553,
JOHN'STONE SU'PPL.Y"
10.36
+B ID VALUE S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
ME 11:15 DEMAND LIST
MA1�lI? DA'f`E�1f 1 j120�S
C HE C ND -G -"#7 NWK HECR-TO7 L
130133
11911
NANCY *KAUFMAN
40.00
130134
00533
KELLY-M`OORE PAINT COMPANY INC.
11.23
--1-31-2-070-0-
-2"0:0 0
130136
130136
12760
TIM *KNIFFIN
700.00
130137
01569
KSRO
720.00
-1-3
E -LINE-
4- .
130139
12482
DEBORAH *LAUC'HNER
69.20
130140
10040
WILLIAM P. *LAWRENCE
135.00
--- t-SO-r4l
0
UES PLiERSEN
130142
08498
SANDRA M. *LIPITZ
100.00
130143
00894
DANIEL *LOGUE
450.00
-3-0-t4-4------------03
2
BRELEI-4:LUSC"OMBE
070-0-
130145
1105E
KENNETH J. *LYNN DDS
24.15
130146
100222
TOM *MARTIN
525.00
-1-3Y1
0�}-G82 J1Xtttd�' MARTY
670-
130148
12490
MASTERSON COMMUNICATIONS
80.00
130149
08720
MBNA AMERICAN BUSINESS CARD
1,019.96
-1 3-d1s 0
1 -33 -2 -9
-BR -PFI -N-` C-A-RTRY
SSD d 0
130151
03214
MIRACLE AUTO PAINTING
400.51
130152
08025
NORCAL BUILDING MATERIALS
187.06
-13-OT 3
0S Q-8--NORTH-BAY-GOIZFOI
AI'r- pE-AL-TH
45. 00
130154
12224
NORTH BAY PERMIT SVCS
52.00
130155
00509
NORTH PARK VETERINARY CLINIC
75.00
-3-01-5'6----01-1
NO RTHE-R N-CAL-I+F OR -NIA JU VE, iLh
65-0-4
130157
11140
ODV INC.
325.59
130158
08499
OFFICE DEPOT
258.32
13 -0 -1 -GO
SGB
OL`D`A D UBE-DEV ELO P MENT-SERVl_C
, S75 70-0
130161
07080
OPPERMAN & SON, INC.
1,205.39
130162
09350
DOUGLAS C. *OSTROWSKI, D.D.S.
64.00
-Ji 3-" Y3
5 3
KRISTIN E1ti1 •�
Q 8-33
130164
00340
PACIFIC BELL
103.08
130166
13014
PACIFIC BELL/WORLD COM
2,4223.29
-13-016
-2S-3P-A-C-I-F-rC-VA-S-AND-ELeCTR7-
4-1553-5"
130168
03010
PACIFIC SOFTWARE SERVICES
1,440.00
130169
10079
PACIFIC SUN
440.00
�JI3-"-
22-4Z-�"A
MESS P -A
td..56
130171
13330
ROBERTA *PARKER
40.00
130172.
13313
JIM *PASSARELL
475.00
�13V-1-7
`r8�cY4
D EL KN E"L"4cP-AT TO
E25. 2 0
130174
11137
BRIAN W. *PAYNE DDS
225.00
130175
13325
DANA *PEARLMAN
70.00
1 30� 76
�1-65`--P�i74LUMACIOOL
OF-BACL
3775
130177
00259
PETTY CASH
197.49
130178
04688
PETTY CASH
147.45
-13 07-9-025-9-P
F I3 ER�,1d I� f d�H E74t
-510
130180
12488
ELENA *PIAZZISI
716.00
130181
02981
PIONEER TIRE & BRAKE
592.80
-1 3-0-1-82-0-0-
3- P-OWE2R`I-ND1 USTR-I-ES , I -N
-0-7-�a0
130183
13301
ALY88A *POWERS
300.00
130184
09551
PRAXAIR
108.42
)S ID VALUE S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
KME 11:15 DEMAND LIST
E MGN D -D -ATE -1-2 713-/2 0 0 2
`C FiE VEN"D70 k #?'N !'t CREC K T
130185
00269
THE *PRESS DEMOCRAT
3,412.03
130186
00767
PURITY PRODUCTS COMPANY
274.61
1-3V-214
P�KE71w—S1i A N"C
v . 64
130188
002265
REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INS.
63,009.00
130189
04908
REDWOOD LOCK
27.48
1-3-02-1-750
r
1-37T 0-0
1301`91
10430
REPUBLIC ELECTRIC
3,955.34
1301$2
13388
ARLENE *RICO
400.00'
_-1�_1 ..
S--S`O
M I SERVICES
4, 593-5 D
130194
11354
JOHN C. *RO.SINSON, DDS
215.00
130195
08675
ROHNERT PARK AUTO PARTS
396.95
X13 tTt ]'G
0 0 G3
HXER-T-P-A-R-K-TOW SERV
5-0-
130197
00337
ROHNERT PARK VETERINARY CLINIC
180.00
130198
09116
GERONIMO *ROMERO DDS
528.20
1 -3.O -f _,
yEVTLL
130200
04797
SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE
1,255.80
130201
00297
SANTA ROSA FIRE EQUIP. INC.
20.98
2 0
4 GJ 00
DW�E
fiR_ C��PA�
GP 1
;5�
130203
0531.1
SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE
8-0.0.0
130204
07665
SANTA ROSA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT
17.28
--rloz0
330 ""
'CA't:-E r4gLE"SO-FTW-XR"E-"I-N
07405
130206
09649
DAVID L. *SCHEINER, DR
812.00
130207
12710
SEARCH GEAR
1,265.12
1---tiE
N D -GEN ESR-ATl-01d-R-O- eF iN
a -2'
130209
02228
PAUL.=*SH'EP'HERD
143.00
130210
10510
JASON *SHERBUNDY
1,400.00
130212
08699
SIERRA SPRINGS WATER COMPANY
62.68
130213
13323
SIX ROSDLEES' INC
30.88
1-3V-214
P�KE71w—S1i A N"C
0 0_-�
130215
10911
GEORGE *SMELTZ
6.48.00
130216
04,045
SO CO FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION
311.50
1-3-02-1-750
r
1-37T 0-0
130218
07549
SO CO TRANSIT - ACCOUNTING
189.0E
130219
00322
SO CO WATER AGENCY
50,608.94
-T-t-3-0-2170
S--S`O
N-0 MA F-eNC-I1N G -KC -AD
3'6-. -0
130221
04989
SONOMiA INDEX TRIBUNE
77.00
13022E
12461
"�"
SONOMA VALLEY PUBLISHING
4,S49.08
13 c 2-Oln9
SOP q-T-ST-rCA-TED-S'YSTEM
; T
130224
02740
SOUND EXPRESSIONS
75.00
130225
04294
STEVEN *STAYROOK
397.41
-3-02 C,
130227
0290
SUNSET LINEN SERVICE
259.00
130228
09850
SUTTER-WARRACK HOSPITAL
2,234.52
1-3-07229
`r 7-6-0"j
A Y -N E---vS U'T T`O-N "DD
4 GJ 00
130230
01801
SYAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
473.23
130231
11938
SYNSIOTICS
145.46
-3 0`232
G 7
wNLTER--*l -ADD E'u-'CC; I
E4 -a -a-
130233
07405
TARGET STORES
49.65
130234
00381
TDS'- TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYS
312.84
aB ID VALUE S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
ME 11:15 DEMAND LIST
Ei°fA�t1-D�'t'E-"1 c7 T37"2 �0�
__CHE- VENDO R -"A -M CHECK-TO'f aL
130235
11634
DAVID J. *THARP, DDS
136.00
130236
04285
THEATRE BAY AREA
200.00
— 1-
R E 8 ECCAfiFfiQM P S O1�1
0"0`0"0
130238
13326
JEFF *THORNE
70.00
130235
08738
TOOBTOWN
175.00
Z70-0-
6 : o -o130241
130241
00264
TRUGREEN LANDCARE
675.26
130242
06=ses
UC REGENTS
270.00
--y928
N"ITETF_RENT
7-1-87-59-
,1-8 - 9130244
130244
00310
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
74.00
130245
10492
UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES
291.33
�I-3
Jt'T-0 7 --VERT
130247
05305
VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY
1.78.20
130248
06449
VISION HEALTH OPTOMETRY CENTER
1,383.25
—1-3Or
�6-3StJ-a!
=1�tAl�'i'-CaMf4UI�t-i't`Y�fZ
130250
11180
BANG OF *WALNUT CREEK
4.17
130251
13239
CHIN-CHU *WANG
589.20
1 3 O c 52
0-4-47-9TWE�T-GRUtUP-I'
A Y M EN'T-C-T R
-0-.37 —
130253
00328
WESTERN FARM CENTER
836.51
130254
09651
DAVID A. *WHEELER, DDB
188.00
—13-025-5
83Si
WH -I TL`O-CK--&-WE-T-NSERGE
; 1-aS7O"0
130256
12727
MARY-RITA *WILLIAMSON
180.00
130257
12359
KEN *WINETT
550.00
11-S02
-1
W-rN'STA _
5vJ-. 8-7
130259
09523
RICHARD,K. *WONG, DDS
280.00
130260
130314
WOOFS & ASSOCIATES
699.82
S
427.22
Total Demand: 458,255.82
i
. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
BILLS FOR APPROVAL
December 19, 2002
Hand Check Numbers 2963-2965
Dated December 11, 2002 $59,250.02
For PreApproval:
Rebuilding Together RP $25,000.00
TOTAL $84,250.02
002963 12529 SIGNET TESTING LABS' 250.00
002964 00253 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 14,000.02
u00 - OHNERT FAKK W45,000.00
Total Demand 8q, 250. 02
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: The Honorable Mayor 8 Members of the City Council From: Sandra M. Lipitz
City Manager Netter Acting City Engineer Step Finance Director
City Attorney Strauss Assistant City Manager Donley
Accountant/Auditor Raymond Finance Services Manager Lauchner
Date: December 10, 2002
CASH BALANCES AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2002
General Fund ($2,378,323.76)
Payroll Account 0.00
Traffic Safety Fund 297,114.61
Motor Vehicle License Fees 870,747.03
R.E.M.I.F. (52,584.62) ($1,263,046.74)
Special Water Connection Fee Fund
Per Acre For Development Fee Fund
Water/Wastewater Fee Fund(Dev. Imp. Fund)
Sewer Service Connection Fee Fund -
Water/Wastewater Fee Fund(Spec. Sewer Conn. Fund)
Water Utility Fund
Sewer Utility Fund
Garbage Utility Fund
Garbage Utility Fund -Commercial Set-aside Fund
Garbage Utility Fund -Rate Stabilization Fund
Garbage Utility Fund-Diversion/Education Set -aside -Fund
General Fund -Refundable Deposits
Utility Fund -Refundable Deposits
Improvement Project Fund
Gas Tax Fund: Sec. 2107 Maint./Const.
Sec. 2107.5 Engineering
Sec. 2106 Const.%Maint.
Sec. 2105
SB 140
Transportation Development Act(TDA) Fund
Capital Outlay Fund
I.S.T.E.A. Fund
Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Fund
Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLESF) Fund
Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (AB2928)
Fire Benefit Assessment(Measure M) Fund
Annexation Fees Fund
Rent Appeals Board Fund
Copeland Creek Drainage Facilities Fund
Debt Service Fund
Debt Service Fund -Assessment. Districts
Traffic Signals Fund
Vehicle Abatement Fund
Performing Arts Center Endowment Fund
Dental Self -Insurance Fund
Petty Cash
General Fund Reserve
General Fund Endowment Reserve
Reserve For Self -Insured Losses
Reserve For Retired Employee Medical
Reserve For Technology Equipment
Reserve For Infrastructure Maintenance
Reserve For Capital Projects
Reserve For Purchase of Video Equipment(New C/H)
Reserve For P.E.R.S. Costs -Public Safety Employees
Reserve For P.E.R.S. Costs -Miscellaneous Employees
Reserve for Dev. of Add'I Rec. Facilities
Miscellaneous Reserve(CDA Loan Principal Repayment)
Reserve For Housing Programs
Reserve For Active Employee Medical
Sub -Total Operating Cash
$283,051.96
6,000.00
318,071.76
312,968.05
28,607.83
Special Enforcement Unit -South
Cash with Fiscal Agent (Municipal Leasing)
Cash with Fiscal Agent (Earned Interest Fund)
Cash with Fiscal Agent (1993 Consolidated Refunding District)
Cash with Fiscal Agent (2002C Water/Wastewater Revenue Bonds)
Sub -Total City Cash
Employee Deferred Compensation(City Is Trustee):
Deferred Compensation- Washington Mutual 457 Plan
Deferred Compensation- ICMA 401(a) Plan
Deferred Compensation- ICMA 457 Plan -Full Time Employees
Deferred Compensation- Washington Mutual -Part Time Employees Plan
Total Employee Deferred Compensation
937,770.93
692,889.55
74,988.33
4,771,905.00
74,988.31
2,637,140.95
1,477,343.55
377,600.69
60,659.92
365,185.88
226,367.11
259,552.23
105,344.35
(370,495.16)
948,699.60
0.00
105,326.34
0.00
30,372.45
58,677.21
120,737.52
17,543.41
59,296.42
37,911.05
60,054.21
0.00
275.46
865,104.43
18,441.06
1,754,220.00
(1,010.95)
3,675.00
2,203,507.58
3,246,116.1.0
867,382.00
1,517,500.00
34,632.79
0.00
783,313.37
70,000.00 ,
267,525.00
697,922.00
163,257.00
73,000.00
177,399.00
0.00
24,609;072.95
12,248.06
92,287.99
0.00
268,904.82
2,000,000.00
26,982,513.82
2,044,546.00
1,667,858.40
8,227,098.60
233,781.30
12,173,284.30
TOTAL CASH .$39,155,798.12
CASH DISTRIBUTION. AS OF OCTOBER 31. 2002
Petty Cash
Payroll Checking Account -Exchange Bank
General Checking Account -Exchange Bank @ 0.750%
Utility Checking Account -Exchange Bank @ 0.750%
Recreation Checking Account -Exchange Bank @ 0.750%
Subtotal of Petty Cash and Checking Accounts
Credit Card Payment Savings Accounts: Finance
Community Center
Sports Center
Building Department
Subtotal of Cash In Credit Card Savings Accounts
Investment Accounts -See Schedule of Investments Attached
Cash With Leasing Company/Municipal Leasing:
Fidelity Investments @ 5.040%
Cash With Fiscal Agent (Earned Interest Fund) @ 5.513%
Subtotal of Cash With Fiscal Agent
Employee Deferred Compensation(City is Trustee):
Deferred Compensation -Washington Mutual 457 Plan
Deferred Compensation-ICMA 401(a) Plan
Deferred Compensation-ICMA 457 Plan -Full Time Employees
Deferred Compensation -Washington Mutual -Part -Time Employees Plan
Total Employee Deferred Compensation
Total Cash Distribution
Investment Yield for OCTOBER 2002 3.782%
$3,675.00
0.00
(594,694.67)
(1,519.00)
1,786.72
(590,751.95)
1,658.63
1,457.47
1,208.46
1,087.76
5,412.32
27,475,565.46
92,287.99
0.00
92,287.99
2,044,546.00
1,667,858.40
8,227,098.60
233, 781.30
12,173,284.30
$39,155,798.12
INVESTMENT POLICY &SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES
The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy of the City of Rohnert Park as
outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #2002-68, adopted April 23, 2002.
The City currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six
months.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK -SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS -OCTOBER 31, 2002
Maturity
%
Investment
Investment
Valuation
Bank Name
Type
Date
Int.
Par Value
Market Value
Source
Exchange Bk Savings
Svgs
N/A
0.750%
$506,051.06
506,051.06
Note (1)
North American Bk
C.D.
11/14/02
7.050%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Provident Bk of Ohio
C.D.
12/08/02
5.500%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Treasury Bank
C.D.
01/17/03
4.960%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
E.Stroudsburg Svgs
C.D.
02/25/03
5.550%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Providian Nat'l Bk
C.D.
02/28/03
7.330%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Mid America Bk
C.D.
04/06/03
5.500%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Family Savings Bk
C.D.
04/16/03
5.250%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Direct Merchants Bk
C.D.
04/18/03
5.260%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
International Fin. Bk
C.D.
04/21/03
6.500%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Farmers SB/N. Madison
C.D.
04/24/03
7.110%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Rumson Fair Haven BT
C.D.
04/25/03
5.130%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
First SB of Huntington
C.D.
04/27/03
7.100%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
First Financial Bk
C.D.
05/29/03
5.150%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
San Jose Nat'l Bk
C.D.
06/04/03
5.150%
300,000.00
300,000.00
Note (1)
Capital One FSB
C.D.
06/19/03
6.250%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Parkvale Savings Bank
C.D.
07/16/03
4.000%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Shelby County Bk
C.D.
07/28/03
6.320%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Nations Bank
C.D.
08/03/03
5.500%
1.00,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Intervest National Bank
C.D.
08/06/03
4.970%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Milwaukee Western Bank
C.D.
08/10/03
5.000%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Community First Bank
C.D.
08/13/03
4.800%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
First N.B./Olathe,KS
C.D.
09/15/03
5.800%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Feliciana Bank
C.D.
10/23/03
3.750%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Interstate Net Bank
C.D.
10/25/03
3.750%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Bk of Oklahoma, N.A.
C.D.
11/01/03
6.700%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Bank of Arkansas
C.D.
11/01/03
6.700%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Keybank USA
C.D.
11/05/03
5.700%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Heritage Savings Bk
C.D.
01/26/04
5.550%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Firstate/Compass Bk
C.D.
01/26/04
6.800%
99,000.00
.99,000.00
Note (1)
Capitol One Bank
C.D.
02/03/04
4.130%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Sunset Bank
C.D.
02/08/04
4.100%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Exchange Bank
C.D.
02/26/04
4.250%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Royal Palm Bnk of Florida
C.D.
03/07/04
3.910%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
FirstComm/PocahontasFSL
C.D.
03/10/04
3.500%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Commerce National Bank
C.D.
03/18/04
3.800%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Farmers Bank
C.D.
03/27/04
4.200%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Americaunited B&T
C.D.
03/28/04
7.200%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Pan American Bk
C.D.
04/18/04
5.320%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Western Bk
C.D.
04/19/04
5:400%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Eurobank
C.D.
04/22/04
4.050%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Heritage Bk
C.D.
05/01/04
7.310%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Klamath First FS&L
C.D.
05/04/04
7.200%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Benchmark Bank
C.D.
05/20/04
4.170%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Mtn.West Bk/Helena
C.D.
05/29/04
5.387%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Park Avenue Bk
C.D.
06/04/04
6.500%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Redwood Credit Union
C.D.
06/06/04
4.850%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Valley State Bank
C.D.
06/08/04
5.250%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
New South Fed.Svgs.Bk.
C.D.
06/20/04
4.150%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
First Nat'l Bank of Marin
C.D.
06/28/04
6.500%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
MBNA American Bank
C.D.
06/30/04
4.120%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Amcore Bank N.A.
C.D.
07/06/04
5.090%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Peoples SB of Groveland
C.D.
07/19/04
4.000%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Cornbelt Bank Trust
C.D.
08/06/04
5.200%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
First N.B.of Chicago
C.D.
08/11/04
6.750%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Bank One
C.D.
08/19/04
6.620%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Crestmark Bank
C.D.
09/04/04
5.000%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
First Source Bank
C.D.
09/04/04
5.000%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Mill Creek Bank
C.D.
09/06/04
3.250%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
So.Br.-Vly NB -Moorefield
C.D.
09/17/04
5.000%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Bank USA
C.D.
09/21/04
6.650%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Union National Bank
C.D.
09/26/04
4.670%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Broadway Nat'l Bk
C.D.
10/12/04
6.650%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
First Bank(Sterling, KS)
C.D.
10/29/04
4.110%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Metropolitan Nat'l Bank
C.D.
10/30/04
4.200%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
First State Bk of N.D.
C.D.
11/03/04
6.750%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
DMB Community Bk
C.D.
11/15/04
6.700%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Pendleton FSB
C.D.
12/27/04
7.160%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Alpine Bank of Illinois
C.D.
01/14/05
4.570%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
State Farm Financial FSB
C.D.
02/13/05
4.900%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Lighthouse Comm.Bk
C.D.
03/06/05
7.250%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
M&T Bank
C.D.
03/15/05
4.480%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Access Bank
C.D.
04/22/05
4.480%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Providian'Bank
C.D.
05/03/05
7.280%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Peoples Bk/Franklin Co.
C.D.
05/04/05
7.450%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Valley Bank of Arizona
C.D.
05/08/05
7.440%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Richfield Bank & Trust
C.D.
06/08/05
7.500%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
First Bank
C.D.
06/17/05
4.450%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Premier Bank
First Alliance Bank
Belvidere National Bank
FNMA MTN
Builders Bank
Busn.Bk/Fox River Vly.
Franklin. Bank
FHLB MTN
FNMA MTN
Mercantile Trust
Strategic Capital Bank
OBA Federal Savings
FNMA MTN
First Comm Bk/Whitehall
FHLB MTN
Golden Security Bank
FHLB MTN
FHLB MTN
FHLB MTN
FHLB MTN
State of Calif.-LAIF
So. Co. Investmt. Pool
C.D.
C.D.
C.D.
M.T.N.
C.D.
C.D.
C.D.
M.T.N.
M.T.N.
C.D.
C.D' '
.D'.
C.D.
M.T.N.
C.D.
M.T.N.
C.D.
M.T.N.
M.T.N.
M.T.N.
M:T.N.
Pooled
Pooled
07/29/05
12/12/05
01/14/06
03/06/06
04/09/06
04/27/06
06/07/06
11/07/06
12/05/06
01/10/07
01/10/07
02/21/07
03/12/07
03/22/07
03/28/0.7
05/13/07
05/15/07
05/23/07
09/10/07
10/22/07
N/A
N/A
Subtotal(See Investment Summary below)
1983-10 R/D-Resv.-So.Co.
1993 Consol.R/D-So.Co.
2002C W/WW Revenue Bonds
Totals
4.450%
99,000.00
99,000.00
4.900%
100,000.00
100,000.00
5.010%
99,000.00
99,000.00
4.625%
400,000.00
403,752.00
7.500%
99,000.00
99,000.00
5.760%
99,000.00
99,000.00
5.750%
99,000.00
99,000.00
4.000%
500,000.00
507,325.00
5.000%
500,000.00
501,720.00
5.230%
99,000.00
99,000.00
5.400%
99,000.00
99,000.00
5.400%
99,000.00
99,000.00
5.150%
500,000.00
506,250.00
5.360%
99,000.00
99,000.00
5.450%
1,000,000.00
1,015,000.00
5.400%
90,000.00
90,000.00
5.250%
1,000,000.00
1,001,560.00
4.010%
1,000,000.00
1,019,380.00
3.500%
1,000,000.00
1,007,340.00
3.000%
1,000,000.00
1,002,190.00
2.687%
8,769,338.58
8,769,338.58
2.687%
114,271.00
114,271.00
$25,206,660.64
$25,271,177.64
2.687%
0.00
0.00
2.687%
268,904.82
268,904.82
1.651%
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
$27,475,565.46
$27,540,082.46
Note (1)
Note (1)
Note (1)
Note (2)
Note (1)
Note (1)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (3)
Note (4)
Note (5)
Note (5)
Note (1) These are investments in Certificates of Deposit. Current Market Value and Par Value are
typically equal.
Note (2) Gilford Securities current market values as of October 31, 2002 are presented.
Note (3) These are funds invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund, State of California.
Current Market and Par Value are typically equal. Interest is received quarterly and the
Par Value remains the same.
Note (4) These are funds invested in the Sonoma County Investment Pool. Current Market Value
and Par Value are typically equal. Interest is received quarterly and the Par Value
remains the same.
Note (5) These funds are being held by Sonoma County acting as a Fiscal Agent for the City of
Rohnert Park.
INVESTMENT SUMMARY BY TYPE
OCTOBER 31, 2002
# of % Of Avg. Average
Investment Type Invmnts Portfolio YTM Par Value Book Value Days TM
CD's -Banks 89 35.38% 5.514% $ 8,917,000 $ 8,917,000 603
Managed Pools(Laif/Scip) 2 35.24% 2.673% 8,883,610 8,883,610 1
Passbook Svgs -Exch Bk 1 2.01% 0.500% 506,051 506,051 1
Medium Term Notes .9 27.37% 3.945% 6,900,000 6,964,517 1546
101 100.00% 25,206,661 25,271,178
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Summary of Revenue & Expenditures
As Of October 31, 2002
Add: Temporary Funding From Sewer Connection Fee Fund(Council Authorized)
For Purchase of Street Light System(Project 1993-06) $225,203.00
Accounts Receivable -Sonoma, County CDC Reimb for Engineering Fees ($295.13)
Accounts Receivable (Reimbursement due Project 1996-06) (12,830.51)
Total Improvement Project Fund ($370,495.16)
Balance @
Current Fiscal Year
Balance @
Project No. and Description
30 -Jun -02
Revenue
Expenditures
31 -Oct -02
1977-04
Transport Avenue Ext.A.D.
29,487.98
0.00
0.00
29,487.98
1978-01
SnyderLn/Hinebaugh Cr A.D.
23,319.67
0.00
0.00
23,319.67
1979-05
Classic Ct. Assess.Dist.
8,387.21
0.00
0.00
8,387.21
1979-10
Laguna Verde Assess.Dist.
11,122.68
0.00
0..00
11,122.68
1983-10
Professional Ctr Dr.A.D.
28,133.01
0.00
0.00
28,133.01
1991-04
RPX/101 O/Cross-Phase II
6,095.14
0.00
0.00
6,095.14
1993-06
Street Lighting Acquisition
(225,,203.00)
0.00
0.00
(225,203.00)
1994-07
Snyder Lane Bikepath
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1995-07
Rubberized RR Crossing
0.00
0.00
124,242.01
(124,242.01)
1996-01
RPX Interchng. Improvmts.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1997-02
Commerce/Laguna Bikepath
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1997-08
Sewer I/1 Repairs
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1998-04
Benecia Youth Ctr Remodel
(73,156.29)
164,795.13
127,515.65
(35,876.81)
1998-09
Sidewalk Access Ramps
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1999-02
Medical Ctr. Site Improvement
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1999-03
City Hall Building
(10,279.09)
10,279.09
1,975.00
(1,975.00)
1999-05
G.I.S. Basemap
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1999-06
PS Water Imps/99
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1999-08
Sewer Flow Test(A/B Sections
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1999-09
M Pool ,
0.00
(17.68)
0.00
(17.68)
1999-10
Snyder Lane Widening
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1999-11
SCADA System Update
38,225.00
0.00
1,733.75
36,491.25
1999-12
Copeland Crk. Extension
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1999-13
Pavement Mgmt. Database
0.00
0.00
2,294.00
(2,294.00)
1999-15
Community Ctr Complex Imps
278.80
0.00
0.00
278.80
1999-16
Stadium Lands Appraisals
(12.90)
553.47
540.57
0.00
2000-01
Civic Ctr. Area Improvements
(2,868.74)
0.00
0.00
(2,868.74)
2000-02
County CAD/RMS System
(25,332.39)
52,928.15
212,010.84
(184,415.08)
2000-03
Camino Colegio Reconstr.
0.00
0.00
3,368.25
(3,368.25)
2000-04
W/W Basin Removal
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2000-05
Traf Signal Control Replacemt
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2000-06
Community Ctr Beam Repair
0.00
0.00
64.50
(64.50)
2000-07
Overlays -2000
0.00
6,676.57
7,761.25
(1,084.68)
2000-08
Commerce Blvd. Bike Path
(5,676.50)
0.00
2,407.50
(8,084.00)
2000-09
Audible Traffic Signals
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2000-13
Energy Retrofit
(25,500.00)
25,500.00
0.00
0.00
2000-14
Community Center Garden
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2000-15
Traffic Signal-GC@Dbltree.
0.00
0.00
80.00
(80.00)
2001-01
SW Pedestrian Ramp Ph2
(6,734.62)
4,835.20
4,916.89
(6,816.31)
2001-02
Adrian Drive Utility Conversior
0.00
0.00
1,212.00
(1,212.00)
2001-03
Community School
0.00
0.00
6,075.28
(6,075.28)
2001-04
P.A.C. Hwy. Signage
(19,110.00)
0.00
71,951.04
(91,061.04)
2001-05
Water Meters Installation
(2,315.00)
0.00
17,536.94
(19,851.94)
2002-01
Traffic Signal Modifications
21,112.00
0.00
0.00
21,112.00
2002-06
Finance Computer System
0.00
109,934.38
142,344.32
(32,409.94)
Sub -total
($230,027.04)
$265,549.93
$728,029.79
($582,572.52)
Add: Temporary Funding From Sewer Connection Fee Fund(Council Authorized)
For Purchase of Street Light System(Project 1993-06) $225,203.00
Accounts Receivable -Sonoma, County CDC Reimb for Engineering Fees ($295.13)
Accounts Receivable (Reimbursement due Project 1996-06) (12,830.51)
Total Improvement Project Fund ($370,495.16)
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Recap of Project Expenditures
As of October 31, 2002
Current Mo. Fiscal Year
Project No. and Description: Expenditures Expenditures
1977-04 Transport Ave Ext. A.D.
0.00
1978-01
SnyderLn/HinebaughCr A.D
0.00
1979-05
Classic Court Assess. Dist.
0.00
1979-10
Laguna Verde Assess. Dist.
0.00
1983-10
Professional Center Drive
0.00
1991-04
RPX/101 O/Cross-Phase II
0.00
1993-06
Street Lighting Acquisition
0.00
1994-07
Snyder Ln. Bikepath
0.00
1994-08
M Park -:Phase II
0.00
1995-07
Rubberized RR Crossing
0.00
1995-09
Public Safety North L.U.S.T.
0.00
1996-01
RPX Interchng. Improvmts.
0.00
1996-12
Snyder Ln Parcel Landscap,
0.00
1997-02
Commerce/Laguna Bikepatl
0.00
1997-06
Toilet Replacement Prog.
0.00
1997-08
Sewer 1/1 Repairs
0.00
1998-03
Water Storage Tanks(3)
0.00
1998-04
Benecia Youth Ctr Remodel
4,055.08
1998-05
Well #42 -Hageman Lane
0.00
1998-06
Overlays -1998
0.00
1998-07
Copeland Crk. Bikepath Re(
0.00
1998-08
PAL Building Remodel
0.00
1998-09
Sidewalk Access Ramps
0.00
1998-10
Emergency Driveway-P/S
0.00
1998-11
Community Center Sculptun
0.00
1999-02
Medical Ctr. Site Improveme
0.00
1999-03
City Hall'
0.00
1999-05
G.I.S. Basemap
0.00
1999-06
PS Water Imps/99
0.00
1999-08
Sewer Flow Test(A/B Sectio
0.00
1999-09
M Pool
0.00
1999-10
Snyder Ln. Widening
0.00
1999-11
SCADA System Upgrade
1,377.50
1999-12
Copeland Crk. Extension
0.00
1999-13
Pavement Mgmt. Database
0.00
1999-14
Park Playground Structures
0.00
1999-15
Community Ctr Complex Iml
0.00
1999-16
Stadium Lands Appraisals
0.00
2000-01
Civic Ctr Area lmprvmnts
0.00
2000-02
County CAD/RMS System
183,296.00
2000-03
Camino Colegio Reconstr.
0.00
2000-04
W/W Basin Removal
(58.05)
2000-06
Community Ctr. Beam Repa
0.00'
2000-07
'RPX Overlays Program
0.00
2000-08
Commerce Blvd Bike Path
0.00
2000-09
Audible Traffic Signals
0.00
2000-10
Cam. Coronado Spd Bumps
0.00
2000-13
Energy Retrofit
'0.00
2000-14
Community Center Garden
0.00
2000-15
Traffic Signal-GC@Dbltree.
0.00
2001-01
SW Pedestrian Ramp -Ph 2
139.74
2001-02
Adrian Drive Uility Conversic
1,212.00
2001-03
Community School
(1,148.40)
2001-04
P.A.C. Hwy. Signage
0.00
2001-05
Water Meters Installation
16,614.94
2002-05
Irrigation Line Relocation
0.00
2002-06
Finance Computer System
36,993.32
TOTALS $242,482.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
124,242.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
127, 515.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,975.00
0:00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,733.75
0.00
2,294.00
0.00
0.00
540.57
0.00
212,010.84
3,368.25
0.00
64.50
7,761.25
2,407.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
80.00
4,916.89
1,212.00
6,075.28
71,951.04
17,536.94
0.00
142,344.32
$728,029.79
Expenditures
Total
1,275,422.74
572,379.87
157,194.99
1,521,881.45
530,849.06
3,467,536.63
0.00
361,465.53
363,704.77
494,696.70
1,326.00
14,003.25
1,61.5.00
94,772.03
1,218,519.99
5,713.50
1,606,051.74
256,356.89
56,319.96
486,204.33
158,709.50
865,518.32
140,216.50
106,809.68
26,896.49
3,874.50
545,045.18
43,404.05
12,175.00
45,400.00
1,164,026.25.
923.00
19,796.25
15,355.50
4,772.00
179,344.00
471.22
39,011.00
781,168.74
402,507.92
11,098.01
833,644.76
1,248.76
30,725.25
8,084.00
24,031.00
13,991.00
357,760.63
69,511.19
157,305.49
11,651.51
1,212.00
84,387.01
91,061.04
19,851.94
0.00
142,344.32
$18,560,491.13
Est. Total
Project
Expenditures
1,305,000
595,700
165,600
1,533,000
548;900
3,420,000
750,900
365,000
365,000
550,000
50,000
700,000
30,000
75,000
1,225,000
30,000
1,610,000
1,000,000
58,000
1,000,000
160,000
90,000
200,000
70,500
26,000
15,000
4,700,000
7,100
15,000
100,000
700,000
10,000
400,000
100,000
10,000
180,000
30,000
50,000
1,000,000
50,000
250,000
300,000
150,000
600,000
500,000
26,300
14,500
200,000
35,000
1.00,000
200,000
500,000
100,000
500,000
3,000,000
100,000
300,000
$30,166,500
CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Summary of Revenue and Expenditures
As of October 31, 2002
CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND:
Neighborhoods A & B
Colegio Vista Area
Ladybug Area
Area West of Freeway
Eagle Park Area
Dorotea Park Area
Sunrise Park Area
Mt.Shadows/Coleman Valley
Rohnert Foothills (Area G)
S.of E.Cotati Ave.(M Section)
Foothills
R Section
Community Facilities
Open Space
Balance @
Current Fiscal Year
Balance @
30 -Jun -02
Revenue
Expenditures
31 -Oct -02
($31,937.25)
$0.00
$0.00
($31,937.25)
0.00
7,760.00
0.00
7,760.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,744.08
0.00
0.00
1,744.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,195.00
0.00
0.00
7,195.00
50,020.00
0.00
0.00
50,020.00
0.00
1,510.00
0.00
1,510.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
174.87
0.00
0.00
174.87
4,100.79
19, 047.30
0.00
23,148.09
44,510.00
4,501.55
0.00
49,011.55
Subtotal $75,807.49 $32,818.85 $0.00 $108,626.34
Less: Accounts Receivable (Re: 4H of Sonoma Co. Deferred Fees) (3,300.00)
Total Capital Outlay Fund' $'105,326.34
COMMUNITyDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: The Chairman and Members of the Community FROM: Sandra M. Lipitz�-
Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park Treasurer
Executive Director Netter City Engineer Gaffney
Asst. Exec. Dir. Donley City Attorney Strauss
Accountant/Auditor Raymond Finance Services Manager Lauchner
Management Analyst Fogle
DATE: December 11, 2002
CASH BALANCES AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2002
Improvement Project Fund
Cash From Property Tax Increment
Low & Moderate Income Housing Fund
Interest From Bond Proceeds
Interest From Increment
Debt Service Fund (1991 TARB) -
Debt Service Reserve Fund (1991 TARB)(Old)
Debt Service Fund (2001 TARBs)
Lease Payment Fund (1991 RCGP)
Redevelopment Fund (1999 TABs)
Debt Service Reserve Fund (1999 TABs)
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CASH
($443,705.78)
285,683.02
3,230,337.63
57,985.53
321,854.92
3,622.57
867,638.15
6,143.83
293.70
2,005,406.85
910, 769.89
$7,246,030.31
CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2002
Checking Accounts:
Interest Rate
Exchange Bank Checking Account
0.20%
$287,097.29
Investment Accounts:
Investment Maturity Interest
Source of
Investment Institution Type Date Rate
Par Value
Market Value
Valuation
Exchange Bank Passbook N/A 0.500%
179,213.19
179,213.19
Note (1)
Capital One Fed. Svgs. Certof Dep. 06/19/03 6.250%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1).
Valencia National Bank Certof Dep. 06/23/03 7.250%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Providian National Bank Certof Dep. 03/17/04 4.030%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Americaunited Bank Cert.of Dep. 03/28/04 7.200%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
New South Fed.\ Svgs.Bk. Cert.of Dep. 06/20/04 4.150%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
First Financial. Bank Certof Dep. 11/15/04 4.400%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Providlan Bank Certof Dep. 12/03/04 4.890%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Metropolitan NaU. Bank Certof Dep. 12/14/04 4.450%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
Capitol One Bank Cert.of Dep. 01/08/05 6.960%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
State Farm Financial FSB Cert.of Dep. 03/07/05 4.900%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Bank of Oklahoma Cert.of Dep. 03/15/05 4.550%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Park Avenue Bank. NA Certof Dep. 04/23/05 5.600%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
First Alliance Bank Cert.of Dep. 12/13/05 4.900%
100,000.00
100,000.00
Note (1)
Key Bank USA Cert.of Dep. 05/04/06 5.100%
99,000.00
99,000.00
Note (1)
State of Calif.-LAIF Pooled Invs. N/A 2.687%
1,575,641.97
1,575,641.97
Note (1)
Sonoma Co Invsmt Pool Pooled Invs. N/A 2.687%
18.202.87
18,202.87
Note (1)
3,165,058.03
3,165,058.03
3;165,058.03
CASH HELD BY FISCAL AGENTS:
Investment Maturity Interest
Investment Institution Type Date Rate
Par Value
Market Value
1991 TARB'S:
US Bank-Trustie
Tax Allocation Refunding Reserve Fund:
Fidelity Daily Money Fund Money Fund N/A 1.470%
282.15
282.15
Note (1)
Union Bank -Trustee
Interest Fund:
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas Fund N/A 1.685%
215.70
215.70
Note (1)
Tax Allocation Principal Fund:
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas Fund N/A 1.685%
1.53
1.53
Note (1)
Tax Allocation Refunding Reserve Fund:
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas Fund N/A 1.685%
870,761.34
870.761.34
Note (1)
871.260.72
871.260.72
871,260.72
2001 TARB'S
US Bank -Trustee
Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Cost of Issuance Fund:
Fidelity Daily Money Fund N/A 1.470%
262.60
262.60
Note (1)
262.60
Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Special Fund:
Fidelity Daily Money Fund N/A 1.470%
263.04
263.04
Note (1)
263.04
Union Bank -Trustee
Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Special Fund:
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas Fund N/A 1.685%
0.00
0.00
Note (1)
Interest Fund:
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas Fund N/A 1.685%
62.83
62.83
Note (1)
Cost of Issuance Fund:
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas Fund N/A 1.685%
5,555.36
5.555.36
Note (1)
5,618.19
1994 Lease Payment Fund:
Union Bank -Trustee
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1.685%
293.70
293.70
Note (1)
293.70
293.70
293.70
1999 TAB'S:
US Bank -Trustee
1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Redevelopment Fund:
Fidelity Daily Money Fund N/A 1.685%
9.03
9.03
Note (1)
9.03
Union Bank -Trustee
1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Redevelopment Fund:
Local Agency Investment Fund N/A 2.687%
1,992,518.36
1,992,518.36
Note (2)
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas. Note N/A 1.685%
000
0.00
Note (2)
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas. Note N/A 1.685%
12,879.46
12.879.46
Note (2)
Total 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Redevelopment Fund
2,005.397.82
2.005,397.82
2,005,397.82
US Bank -Trustee
1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Reserve Fund:
Fidelity Daily Money Fund N/A 1.470%
0.00
0.00
Note (1)
0.00
US Bank -Trustee
1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Costs of Issuance Fund:
Fidelity Daily Money Fund N/A 1.470%
0.00
0.00
Note (1)
0.00
Union Bank -Trustee
1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Reserve Fund:
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas. Note N/A 1.685%
910,742.13
910,742.13
Note (2)
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas. Note N/A 1.685%
0.71
0.71
Note (2)
Total 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Reserve Fund
910.742.84
910,742.84
1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Interest Fund:
Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas. Note N/A 1.685%
27.05
27.05
910.769.89
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CASH
$7,246,030.31
Investment Yield for OCTOBER 2002
2.793%
INVESTMENT POLICY & SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES
The investments above are in with the investment
policy of the Community Development
Commission of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined In the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution
#2002-68,
adopted on April 23, 2002. The Commission currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure
requirements for the next six months.
Note (1) The source of valuation for these investments is their respective monthly statements. The Par
Value and
Market'Value for these investments are typically the same as interest is paid or wired monthly.
Note(2) The source of valuation for this Investment is the October 31, 2002 US Bank and Union Bank Trust Statements.
F'
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
_IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003
Summary of Revenue and Expeditures
October 31, 2002
ACTIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PROJECTS:
Balance @ Current Fiscal Year Balance @
Project No. and Description 30 -Jun -02 Revenue Expenditures 31 -Oct -02
1999-04 Library $35,239.41 $1,327,964.62 $949,288.44 $413,915.59
2001-06 Golf Course Project (115,249.90) (105.32) 742,266.15 (857,621.37)
Totals ($80,010.49) $1,327,859.30 $1,691,554.59 ($443,705.78)
($443,705.78)
PROJECTS SINCE INCEPTION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION:
Total
Current Mo.
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
Project
Project No. and Description:
Expenditures
Expenditures
Total
Expenditures
1980-04
Performing Arts Center
Closed
Closed
7,343,365.73
$7,343,366,
1984-21
Expressway Extension
Closed
Closed
1,297,481.39
1,297,482
1986-25
Seed Farm Drive Extension
Closed
Closed
30,867.66
30,868
1987-15
Roberts Lake Road
Closed
Closed
1,547,369.43
1,547,370
1988-15
Swim Center
Closed
Closed
144,688.38
144,689
1988-18
Public Safety Building
Closed
Closed
7,184,580.56
7,185,000
1988-23
Senior Center
Closed
Closed
851,620.35
851,621
1989-12
RP Expwy Widening
Closed
Closed
308,383.61
308,384
1990-02
R.P.J.H. Gym/Bldg
Closed
Closed
750,000.00
750,000
1990-05
A Park Lights
Closed
Closed
93,897.69
93,898
1990-14
Animal Shelter
Closed
Closed
1,393,699.43
1,393,700
1991-01
Commerce BI. Bikepath
Closed
Closed
120,476.95
161,000
1991-04
RPX/101 Overcrossing
Closed
Closed
374,340.99
375,000
1992-01
SW Blvd Landscaping
Closed
Closed
11,803.35
11,804
1999-04
Library
$202,924.01
$949,288.44
6,904,661.29
8,000,000
2001-06
R.P. Golf Course Project
$275,508.78
742,266.15
1,473,245.58
1,000,000
Totals
$478,432.79
$1,691,554.59
$29,830,482.39
$30,494,182
ROHNERT PARK FINANCING A UTHORITY
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: The Chairman and Board Members of the FROM: Sandra M. Lipitz
Rohnert Park Financing Authority Authority Treasurer
Executive Director Netter City Engineer Gaffney
Management Analyst Fogle City & Authority Attorney Strauss
Accountant/Auditor Raymond Finance Services Manager Lauchner
DATE: December 10, 2002
CASH BALANCES AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2002
1999 C.O.P.'s-Capital Facilities Project:
Capital Project Fund -1999 C.O.P.'s
$4,844,600.67
Costs of Issuance Fund -1999 C.O.P.'s
'0.00
Lease Payment Fund -1999 C.O.P.'s
23,650.41
1999 C.O.P.'s-Master Equipment Lease Program:
Debt Service Fund -1999 Master Equipment Lease
177.68
Debt Service Reserve Fund -1999 Master Equipment Lease
183,962.41
Capital Project Fund -1999 Master Equipment Lease -
828,210.34
Costs of Issuance Fund -1999 Master Equipment Lease
0.00
TOTAL ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY CASH $5,880,601.51
CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2002
CASH HELD BY FISCAL AGENTS:
Maturity Interest Source of
Investment Institution Date Rate Par Value Market Value Valuation
1999 C.O.P.'s Caaltal Facilities Prolect Funds:
Union Bank
1999 C.O.P.'s Lease Payment Fund:
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1.672% $23,650.41 $23,650.41 Note (1)
Total $23,650.41 $23,650.41 $23,650.41
1999 C.O.P.'s Capital Prolect Fund:
Union Bank
Local Agency Investment Fund N/A 2.687% $1,751,085.59 $1,751,085.59 Note (1)
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1.672% 997,457.30 997,457.30 Note (1)
FNMA Discount Note 05/02/03 2.358% 2,096,057.78 2 124 275.20 Note (2)
Total $4,844,600:67 4,872,818.09 4,844,600.67
1999 C.O.P.'s Costs of Issuance Fund:
Union Bank
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1.672%
0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00 0.00
1999 Master Equipment Lease Funds:
.
1999 Series A-5 Year Equipment Fund:
1999 Master Equipment Lease -Lease Payment Funds:
Union Bank
Union Bank
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1•.672%0 $772,600.13
$772,600.13_ Note (1)
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1.672%
$177.68
$177.68 Note (1)
Union Bank '
177.68
1999 Master Equipment Lease -Reserve Funds:
$0.00
0.00
Union Bank
TOTAL ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY CASH
$5,880,601.51
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1.672%
$0.00
$0.00
1999 Master Equipment Lease -Reserve Funds:
Union Bank
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1.672%
$183,962.41
$183962.41 Note (1)
183,962.41
183,962.41
$183,962.41
1999 Master Eaulament Lease -Capital Protect Funds:
1999 Series -A-3 Year Equipment Fund:
Union Bank
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1.672% $55,610.21
$55,610.21 Note (1)
1999 Series A-5 Year Equipment Fund:
Union Bank
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1•.672%0 $772,600.13
$772,600.13_ Note (1)
$828,210.34
$828,210.34 828,210.34
1999 Master Equipment Lease -Costs of Issuance Funds:
Union Bank '
Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 1.672% $0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
TOTAL ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY CASH
$5,880,601.51
Investment Yield for OCTOBER 2002 2.212%
INVESTMENT POLICY & SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES
The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy, of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in
the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #2002-68, adopted on April 23, 2002. The Authority currently
has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six months.
Note(1) The source of valuation for this investment is the October 31, 2002 Union Bank Trust Statements. However
the Par Value and Market Value are typically the same as interest is credited and paid monthly.
Note(2) The source of valuation for this investment is the October 31, 2002 Union Bank Trust Statements.
City of '
ROHNERT
MEMORANDUM
Office of the City Manager
DATE: December 13, 2002
TO: Joe Netter, City Manager
FROM: Steve Donley, Assistant City Manager
Council g
Miscellaneous
Communications
Agenda • q.
Copy to:
copy to:
SUBJECT: EXPLANATION OF CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS 2002-272,
2002-273, 2002-274 FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION AT
THE DECEMBER 19, 2002 MEETING
On the December 19, 2002 City Council agenda, three resolutions are on the
consent agenda requesting City Council endorsement of Community Development
Block Grant Applications for the Boys and Girls Club (Reso 2002-272), Committee
on the Shelterless (Reso 2002-273), and Rebuilding Together (Reso 2002-274).
Applicants for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding must receive
endorsement by the local governing body for their applications to be considered.
The funding being requesting by the non-profit agencies are restricted to the
provision of services to low-income individuals and families. The endorsement
does not commit any city resources or funding.
CDBG funding applications are processed by the County of Sonoma Community
Development Commission and reviewed by a citizen committee appointed by the
County Board of Supervisors. The ultimate authority of allocating A'he -CDBG-
funding rests with the Board of Supervisors.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 272
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
ENDORSING THE
ROHNERT PARK BOYS' AND GIRLS' CLUB
SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the Boys' and Girls' Club of Rohnert Park was initiated to assist young people in
our community by providing after-school and summer activities to help keep youth occupied in
wholesome activities and off the streets; and
WHEREAS, the vast majority of these youth come from low-income families; and
WHEREAS, the Sonoma County Community Development Commission (SCCDC) is taking
applications for grants for FY 2003-2004 and the Boys' & Girls' Club is applying for such a grant
in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000), which will be used to help provide services;
and
WHEREAS, one of the requirements of applying for a grant from SCCDC is endorsement from
the communities in which the grantee serves.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park
that it commends the Boys' and Girls' Club for its diligent work in helping youth from
predominately low-income families.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it
wholeheartedly endorses application by the Boys' and Girls' Club to SCCDC for the requested
$30,000 in grant funds.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19th day of December. 2002
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 273
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
ENDORSING
THE COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS [COTS]
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park participates in the Sonoma County
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program; and
WHEREAS, the Committee on the Shelterless- (COTS) intends to apply for
CDBG community services funds to provide services to low-income families in Rohnert
Park; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park commends COTS for their work providing
emergency shelter/housing, a center for homeless children, as well as an opportunity
center.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Rohnert Park that it strongly supports and endorses the application for CDBG funds
submitted by the Committee on the Shelterless (COTS) and urges approval of this
application.
DULY and REGULARLY ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Rohnert Park this 19th day of December, 2002.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST
Deputy City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 274
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
ENDORSING
REBUILDING TOGETHER ROHNERT PARK
SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, Rebuilding Together Rohnert Park [RTRP] (formerly Christmas in April) was incorporated
on March 16, 2000 and soon after obtained its 501(c)(3) charitable classification; and
WHEREAS, RTRP rehabilitates the homes of very low- and low-income homeowners, primarily the
elderly, disabled, and families with dependent children so they may remain in their homes living in warmth,
safety, and independence; and
WHEREAS, the work accomplished for the needy homeowners includes, but is not limited to, installing
safety grab bars in bathrooms, wheelchair ramps and lifts, replacing roofs, plumbing, wiring, and all other
vital repairs. Donations of building materials and funds are provided by local businesses and government
agencies; and
WHEREAS, RTRP has expanded its geographical scope to include the City of Cotati and is planning to
increase the number of homes to receive major rehabilitation; and
WHEREAS, the Sonoma County Community Development Commission (SCCDC) is taking applications
for grants for FY 2003-2004 and Rebuilding Together Rohnert Park is applying for such a grant in the
amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000), which will be used to help provide materials and some
professional labor; and
WHEREAS, one of the requirements of applying for a grant from SCCDC is endorsement from the
communities in which the grantee serves.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it
commends Rebuilding Together for its diligent work in helping to assist the most needy in our community
and endorses their application to SCCDC for the requested $15,000 in grant funds.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19t' day of December, 2002
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
Pt UlsE D
"'is- 000 to ipfa24 000
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-274
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
ENDORSING
Council: X Date j
Miscellaneous
Communications
Agenda/,?
Copy to:
Coy to:
REBUILDING TOGETHER ROHNERT PARK
SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, Rebuilding Together Rohnert Park [RTRP] (formerly Christmas in April) was incorporated
on March 16, 2000 and soon after obtained its 501(c)(3) charitable classification; and
WHEREAS, RTRP rehabilitates the homes of very low- and low-income homeowners, primarily the
elderly, disabled, and families with dependent children so they may remain in their homes living in warmth,
safety, and independence; and
WHEREAS, the work accomplished for the needy homeowners includes, but is not limited to, installing
safety grab bars in bathrooms, wheelchair ramps and lifts, replacing roofs, plumbing, wiring, and all other
vital repairs. Donations of building materials and funds are provided by local businesses and government
agencies; and
WHEREAS, RTRP has expanded its geographical scope to include the City of Cotati and is planning to
increase the number of homes to receive major rehabilitation; and
WHEREAS, the Sonoma County Community Development Commission (SCCDC) is taking applications
for grants for FY 2003-2004 and Rebuilding Together Rohnert Park is applying for such a grant in the
amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), which will be used to help provide materials and some
professional labor; and
WHEREAS, one of the requirements of applying for a grant from SCCDC is endorsement from the
communities in which the grantee serves.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it
commends Rebuilding Together for its diligent work in helping to assist the most needy in our community
and endorses their application to SCCDC for the requested $20,000 in grant funds.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19'' day of December, 2002
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-275
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH
MS. TONI BERTOLERO OF WINZLER & KELLY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS,
FOR THE APPOINTMENT AS INTERIM CITY ENGINEER
FOR THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
WHEREAS, the City Engineer rendered his resignation as of December 4, 2002;
and
WHEREAS, there are several administrative functions required of the City
Engineer as outlined in the Rohnert Park Municipal Code, Chapters 13 and 16; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager desires to appoint an Interim City Engineer to
fulfill the responsibilities as outlined in the Municipal Code and to provide other general
Engineering services as may be required; and
WHEREAS, Toni Bertolero with the firm of Winzler & Kelly, Consulting
Engineers, has provided a proposal to perform Engineering Services to the City of
Rohnert Park; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Bertolero is currently a contract Engineer for the City of Cotati
and is willing to act in the capacity as Interim City Engineer for the City of Rohnert Park.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rohnert Park that it concurs with the City Manager's appointment of Toni Bertolero of
Winzler & Kelly to the position of Interim City Engineer.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby authorize and
approve an agreement by and between Toni Bertolero of Winzler & Kelly, Consulting
Engineers, and the City of Rohnert Park, a municipal corporation, for the appointment of
Interim City Engineer for the City of Rohnert Park.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and
directed to execute same for and on behalf of the City of Rohnert Park.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 2002.
ATTEST:
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Deputy City Clerk Mayor
JH -h:121902 Resol Appointing Interim City Engineer
City Manager's Office
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and FROM:
Members of the City Council
Council; X
Miscellancom
Communications
A ends g
Con to:
Joseph D. Netter
City Manager
RE: Interim City Engineer DATE: December 11, 2002
As you are aware, former City Engineer Joe Gaffney retired December 4, 2002. 1 have
been working with the firm of Winzler & Kelly, Consulting Engineers, to providing
Engineering services on a temporary basis. An individual in their firm by the name of
Ms. Toni Bertolero, is currently a contract Engineer for the City of Cotati. On an interim
basis, Ms. Bertolero is willing to act in the capacity as Interim City Engineer for the City
of Rohnert Park.
Ms. Bertolero is in the process of formulating a contract letter which we will use to
generate a formal agreement.
The specific projects I have assigned for her immediate attention are as follows:
♦ The CalTrans Co -Operative Agreement on the Wilfred Avenue Interchange Project
♦ Public Facilities Financing Plan - Review of Harris & Associates report
♦ Project Amy's Kitchen in the southeast corner adjacent to the Agilent site — Review
of water/sewer needs request
♦ General Engineering Department oversight — Reporting directly to Public Works
Manager Bill Stephens
This program is an interim measure that may turn out to be permanent based on the
contract terms and conditions as negotiated. Currently Ms. Bertolero will keep a record
of her hours (time and materials) until such .time as a formal contract is executed. I may
recommend that she work based on a monthly retainer based on a specified number of
hours worked per week. This will be decided once negotiations are finalized and we get
a feel for the Departments' needs.
We met with the Engineering Department Staff and they are very excited about the
experience and expertise of Ms. Bertolero as well as the depth and diversity of
Engineering services that Winzler & Kelly provide.
Hopefully the final agreements will be completed by the Special Council meeting
scheduled for December 19, 2002 or the City Council's regular meeting scheduled for
January 14, 2003. Should you have any questions concerning this matter please don't
hesitate to contact me.
cc: Pamala Robbins, Personnel Manager
Bill Stephens, Public Works Manager
Engineering Department Staff
Department Heads
S
��7Il�TZ-7 FR sz��ELLY
C O N S- u L T I N O E N O I N E E R* S
Antoinette (Toni) Bertolero
Civil Engineer
Experience
Proposed Responsibility Ms. Bertolero has over 20 years of experience in municipal engineering. Her
Project Manager broad experience has been in the area of public works and utilities engineering
and management. She has held the title of City Engineer with the cities of
Benicia and Cotati and has also held the.title of Utilities Engineer -Manager for
the City of Benicia Utilities Department. Her experience also includes public
Education outreach and consent building, water supply and contract negotiations, agency
B.S./1980/Civil coordination, permit acquisition, and regulatory agency negotiations.
Engineering, University
of California at Berkeley Related experience includes the following:
Project Manager/coordinator for the City of Santa Rosa Geysers Recharge
Pioject. Responsibilities in this $150 million project include being the task
Professional Registration leader for local permits acquisition, local agency coordination, hazardous
1983/CiviVCA materials project assessment and oversight, and right-of-way acquisition
from public agencies_ .
Grade 4 Water Operator
Certified Project Manager/coordinator for the City of Santa Rosa Incremental
Recycled Water Program (IRWP). This program identifies project
alternatives to be considered for the future disposal of wastewater flows
resulting from increases in population of cities that discharge to the Santa
Rosa (regional) Treatment Plant. The technical memoranda also consider
disposal and treatment impacts resulting from the upcoming California
Toxics Rule (CTR). Study included preparation of technical memoranda
pertaining to project alternatives such as indoor water conservation,
agricultural reuse, river discharge, rapid infiltration and ponds, well
injection, urban reuse, and aquifer storage and recovery.
Project Manager for the design of the Cordelia Unit #3 Upgrade for the
City of Vallejo. The Project initially consisted of installation of variable
drives for the existing raw water pumps and the renovation of the
emergency power engine for the pump motors. Winzler & Kelly's
preliminary design led to a more effective and efficient pumping strategy
that resulted in an upgrade, not to the Cordelia Pump Station, but to the
Jameson Canyon Pump Station. Design consisted of electrical
modifications, installation of additional pump and drives.
• Project Manager for the design of the Monticello Pump Station Renovation
Project for the City of Vallejo. The Project is for the renovation of the
City's raw water transmission system delivering a maximum flow of 18.6
mgd.. Work includes demolition, replacement of three 200 -Hp vertical
turbine pumps, construction of enclosed pump house and ventilation
system. Work included complex construction sequencing to ensure reliable
operation of facilities during construction.
• City Engineer for the City of Cotati performing duties of the office,
including capital improvement projects engineering, water and wastewater
BERTOLERO Page 1
C O N 8- U L T I N 6 E N O I N E E R 8
Antoinette (Toni) Bertolero
Civil Engineer
Experience
system planning, and representing the Engineering Division at Planning
Commission and City Council meetings. Responsibilities also include
coordination/negotiations with the Sonoma County Water Agency for
technical review of water supply ad storm drainage issues, and
development review and representing the Engineering Department before
City Council and Planning Commission.
Project Manager for the design of the Redwood Drive Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station for the City of Cotati. Project included construction of 2,700
feet of force main and a sewer lift station with two 5 -Hp submersible
pumps. Work included acquisition of right-of-way.
Assistant Project Manager for the City of Petaluma Mainline Railroad
Bridge Replacement Project. Project consisted of the planning and design
of the removal and replacement of an existing railroad bridge across the
Petaluma River. Project involved coordination with the US Army Corps of
Engineers, the Northwestern Pacific Railroad, Northcoast Rail Authority,
and the Golden Gate Bridge District.
Project Manager for the Llano Pump Station Project for the City of Santa
Rosa. Design of 4,000 Hp pump station that delivers up to 21 mgd of
reclaimed water to the Geysers geothermal steam fields.
Utilities Engineer/Manager for the City of Benicia responsible for the
City's water/wastewater facilities. Developed and implemented facilities
replacement program, capital improvement program and other utility -
related programs (such as pollution prevention cross connection control,
water conservation, water quality and pretreatment). Project representing.
Ms. Bertolero's past experience for the City of Benicia are listed below:
Wastewater Treatment Expansion Project: Project included the planning
and design of a $25 million wastewater treatment plant expansion for the
City of Benicia. Improvements consisted of two new activated sludge
aeration basins, two new clarifiers, a new digester, a new dissolved air
flotation thickener, odor control improvements, and a new
operations/maintenance/administration building.
Water Treatment Plant Expansion. $6 million water treatment plant
expansion construction project. Improvements included a new
sedimentation basin and new GAC filters.
Seismic Retrofit Project. Project included the planning, design, and
construction of $1 million interior recoating and seismic retrofit of 2.2 MG
steel tank and did so under budget (first phase of reservoir improvement
Prole)•
rage z
..�' '�xTNIl�7ZLER�-�,ILLIL�Y
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Antoinette (Toni) Bertolero
Civil Engineer.
Experience
Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade. Project consisted of the design and
construction of a $4 million wastewater treatment plant upgrade.
Improvements included installation of a new secondary unit (rotating
biological contactors) and a gravity thickener.
Successfully promoted and acquired water quality testing and monitoring
of source water for North Bay Aqueduct users through the Municipal
Water Quality Investigation Committee.
BERTOLERO Page 3
if
4�r WINZLER(S;r,KELLY
C O N S' U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
December 12, 2002
i �Yrs
ppoly
OFF 7,
Mr. Joe Netter, City Manager
City of Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Re: Letter Proposal to Provide City Engineering Services
Dear Mr. Netter:
I Miwellanmus I , A
t0:
to:
Ref: P2-220000-004
Winzler & Kelly is pleased to submit this letter proposal to provide the City with city
engineering services on an as -needed basis.
Currently both the City and Winzler & Kelly are working towards a formal agreement including
a scope and estimate of costs for services, which include capital improvement engineering,
development review, and general city engineering services. Until that agreement is finalized, the
City desires a temporary arrangement to ensure that the role of City Engineer is provided without
delay and that there is coverage for ongoing projects that require the immediate review and
oversight of the City Engineer.
Toni Bertolero will be assigned as the Interim City Engineer and will report to Bill Stephens, the
City's Public Works Manager. We acknowledge that the City wishes to maximize the use of the
City's Engineering and Public Works staff and Toni will do so. At times, she may need to use
Winzler & Kelly technical staff for support services not available to her in the Engineering and
Public Works departments, and as approved by the Public Works Manager. It is estimated that
Toni will spend approximately one to two mornings (or afternoons) per week at the Rohnert Park
City Hall office and will be available to answer calls from the City at our Santa Rosa office. The
specific times will be coordinated with the Public Works Manager, depending on the workload
and staff needs.
Winzler & Kelly is ready to commence with this arrangement, effective immediately, and upon
your approval. Attached is a copy of Winzler & Kelly's standard labor charges. Toni's standard
hourly rate is $125 per hour, however, for the City engineering services, her hourly rate will be
$95 per hour. We acknowledge that this hourly rate is open to negotiation of the engineering
services agreement that is ongoing.
Creative Solutions for Over 50 Years
495 Tesconi Circle, Santa Rosa, CA 95401-4696
tel 707.523.1010 fax 707.527.8679
www.w-and-k.com
WINZLERSZI�LLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G N E E R S
Mr. Joe Netter
December 12, 2002
Page 2
Thank you for selecting Winzler & Kelly for this assignment. We look forward to working with
the City in this key role. If you have any questions regarding this letter, feel free to call me or
Toni at 523-1010.
Sincerely,
WINZLER & KELLY
"t
Mc Solomon
Region Manager
as
Attachment
"`
FEE SCHEDULE
WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SANTA ROSA
(Effective July 2002)
Hourly Ra .s (1)
Principal
Level IX, X
$ 130-185
Associate Engineer
Levels VII, VIII
110-160
Senior Project Engineer
Levels V, VI
90-105
Staff Engineer
Level I thru IV
40-85
Associate Scientist
Levels VII, VIII
130-155
Senior Project Scientist
Levels V, VI
100-125
Staff Scientist
Level I thru IV
30-95
Senior Surveyor
Levels V thru VIII
75-110
Staff Surveyor
Levels I thru IV
60-70
Survey Crew (2 -person)
135-180(2)
Survey Crew (3 -person)
195-250(2)
Senior Technician
Levels V thru VIII
70-100
Staff Technician
Levels I thru IV
35-65
Senior Designer
Levels VIII thru IX
90-110
Staff Designer
Levels VI thru VII
70-85
Senior CADD
Levels IV thru V
60-65
Staff CADD
Levels I thru IM
35-55
Senior Wordprocessor (3)
Levels V thru VIII
60-90.
WP/Support (3)
Levels I thru IV
25-55
(1) A surcharge to our rates is added for forensic -related services.
(2) Actual crew rates vary with personnel assigned, and may be superceded by California's
prevailing wage rates, if applicable.
(3) Includes wordprocessors, clerical staff, etc.
Actual cost plus 15%.
The cost of using equipment and specialized supplies is billed on the basis of employee hours
dedicated to projects. This method is less costly, but less precise, than billing on the basis of "units of
service." We strive to maintain fair and competitive rates, designed to recover our investment in these
items which bring increased efficiency to employee labor. Instead of billing one rate with no regard to
the types of projects, we have opted to apply four separate rates, such that only those projects utilizing
certain types of equipment are charged. Our rates are:
A. Office consumables $5.00/hr
B. Environmental Department consumables $10.00/hr
C. Survey consumables $10.00/hr
D. Environmental, Construction and Land Surveying equipment
Various at market
FEESR002.doc
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into this
between the City of Rohnert Park, hereinafter
"Consultant."
and
WHEREAS, the City requires
day of , 200_, by and
referred to as the "City," and
. hereinafter - referred to as the
WHEREAS, the Consultant is qualified and experienced to provide such services.
NOW, THEREFORE, said City and said Consultant for the considerations hereinafter set
forth, mutually agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK. Consultant shall perform those services described as Tasks in
the Scope of Work and Schedule of Performance attached as Exhibit "A" within the time frames
stated therein. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that time is of the essence in this contract
because the City has a contractual obligation to a third party to implement metered water and sewer
rates within a specific time frame. Therefore, Consultant's compensation will be reduced by an
amount equal to $1,000 for each day that Consultant fails to provide the work product within the
time stated in Exhibit A.
2. COORDINATION. Consultant shall assign , to
personally participate in said project and to coordinate the activities of the Consultant.
3. COMPENSATION.
A. City shall pay Consultant as compensation in full for such services and
expenses at the rates set forth in the Standard Hourly Rates and Charges attached as Exhibit "B," the
total sum not to exceed $ . Progress payments will be tied to
completion of tasks so all payments are proportional to the work completed.
B. Consultant shall submit itemized monthly statements for work performed.
City -shall make any payment due within thirty (30) days after approval of the invoice by City.
Payment will be made for the approved amount of the invoice minus ten (10) percent. The ten (10)
percent retained by City will be held until 30 days after final completion and acceptance of the
contract work.
C. Payments due and payable to Consultant for current services are within the
current budget and within an available, unexhausted and unencumbered appropriation of the City. In
the event the City has not appropriated sufficient funds for payment of Consultant services beyond
the current fiscal year, this Agreement shall cover only those costs incurred up to the conclusion of
the current fiscal year; payment for additional work is conditional upon future City appropriation.
4. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of its execution until the
completion of the work contemplated by this Agreement and its final acceptance by City unless
terminated earlier as provided herein.
5. NOTICES. All notices, bills, and payments shall be made in writing and may be
given by personal delivery or by mail. Notices, bills and payments sent by mail should be addressed
as follows:
TO CITY: [Dent. Namel
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
P.O. Box 660
ROHNERT PARK, CA 94559-0660
TO CONSULTANT:
and when so addressed, shall be. deemed given upon deposit in the United States mail,
postage prepaid. In all other instances, notices, bills and payments shall be deemed given at the
time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names and addresses of the person to whom
notices, bills and payments are to be given by giving notice pursuant to this Paragraph.
6. AMENDMENT OF SCOPE OF WORK. City shall have the right to amend the
Scope of Work within the Agreement by written notification to the Consultant. In such event, the
compensation and time of performance shall be subject to renegotiation upon written demand of
either party to the Agreement. Failure of the Consultant to secure City's written authorization for
extra or changed work shall constitute a waiver of any and all right to adjustment in the contract
price or time due, whether by way of compensation, restitution, quantum meruit, etc. for work done
without the appropriate City authorization.
7. CITY'S RIGHT TO TERMINATE/SUSPEND CONTRACT. At any time and for
any or no reason, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, take possession of the
Consultant's work, e.g., studies, preliminary drawings, computations, specifications, etc., insofar as
they are complete and acceptable to the City, and pay the Consultant such equitable proportion of
the total remuneration as the work satisfactorily done by the Consultant at the time of such
discontinuance bears to the whole of the work required to be done by the Consultant under the terms
of this Agreement.
8. CORRECTION OF WORK. The performance of services or acceptance of information
furnished by Consultant shall not relieve the Consultant from obligation to correct any defective,
inaccurate or incomplete work subsequently discovered and all such work shall be remedied by the
Consultant on demand without cost to the City.
9. DELAYS AND EXTENSIONS. The Consultant will be granted time extensions for
delays beyond the Consultant's control. Time extensions will be equal to the length of the delay or
as otherwise agreed upon between the Consultant and the City. In such event, compensation as set
forth in the Scope of Work shall be subject to renegotiation upon written demand of either parry to
the Agreement.
10. RECORDS OF PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
contract performance costs, expenses, etc., and make these records available for inspection, audit,
and copying by the City during the agreement period and for a period of three (3) years from the
date of final payment.
11. SUBCONTRACTING. None of the services covered by this contract shall be
subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City. In accordance with Government Code
Section 7550, Consultant agrees to state in a separate section of any filed report the numbers and
dollars amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to preparation of the report.
12. ASSIGNMENT. The Agreement shall not be assigned by the Consultant in whole
or in part, without the written consent of the City.
13. INDEMNIFICATION. To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall
indemnify, hold harmless, release and defend City, its officers, employees and agents from and
against any and all actions, claims, demands, damages, disability, losses, expenses including
attorney's fees and other defense costs and liabilities of any nature that may be asserted by any
person or entity including Consultant, in whole or in part, arising out of Consultant's activities
hereunder, including the activities of other persons employed or utilized by Consultant in the
performance of this Agreement (including design defects and regardless of City's approval, use or
acceptance of the work or work product hereunder) excepting liabilities due to the sole negligence
or willful misconduct of City. This indemnification obligation is not limited in any way by any
limitation on the amount or type of damages or. compensation payable by or for Consultant under
Worker's Compensation, disability or other employee benefit acts or the terms, applicability or
limitations of any insurance held or provided by Consultant and shall continue to bind the parties
.after termination/completion of this Agreement.
14. INSURANCE. Without limiting Consultant's indemnification provided herein,
Consultant shall take out and maintain, throughout the period of this Agreement, the following
policies of insurance placed with insurers with a current A.M. Bests rating of no less than A:VH or
its equivalent against injury/death to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in
connection with the activities hereunder of Consultant, its agents, employees or subcontractors:
A. Comprehensive or Commercial General Liability Insurance -at least as -broad --
as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001),
in an amount of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence. If work involves. explosive, underground or collapse
risks, XCU must be included. If a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit
shall apply separately to this project or the general aggregate shall be twice the required occurrence
limit. Said policy shall contain, or be endorsed with, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, employees and agents, are covered as insureds for liability
arising out of the operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant. The coverage shall contain
no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, agents and
employees.
(2) The policy shall not be canceled or materially reduced in coverage without thirty
(30) days prior written notice (10 days for non-payment of premium) to City by certified mail.
(3) The inclusion of more than one insured shall not operate to impair the rights of
one insured against another insured, and the coverage afforded shall apply as though separate
policies had been issued to each insured, but the inclusion of more than one insured shall not operate
to increase the limits of the insurer's liability.
(4) For claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance is primary coverage
to the City, and any insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the City is excess to
Consultant's insurance and will not be called upon to contribute with it.
(5) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the parties, including
breach of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, its officers, employees and agents.
B. Automobile liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as ISO Form
numbers CA 000106 92, Code 1 (any auto), for vehicles used in the performance of this Agreement
with minimum coverage of not less than $1,000,000 per accident combined single limit (CSL).
Such policy shall contain or be endorsed with the provision that coverage shall not be canceled or
materially reduced in coverage without thirty (30) days prior written notice (10 days for non-
payment of premium) to City by certified mail.
C. Worker's Compensation insurance meeting statutory limits of Labor Code which
policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain a waiver of subrogation against City, its officers,
agents, and employees and provide for thirty (30) days prior written notice to City in the event of
cancellation. If Consultant has no employees, Consultant may sign and file the following
certification in lieu of insurance:
"I am aware of the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700
which requires every employer to be insured against liability for
workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance
with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with the
provisions of that code before commencing with and during the
performance of the work of this contract. "
D. Professional liability insurance/errors and omission coverage in an amount no
less than $1,000,000.00 combined single limit (CSL). If insurance is written on a claim -made basis,
Consultant agrees to maintain such insurance in effect for at least three (3) years following
completion of performance under this Agreement.
E. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates and original endorsements
effecting the required coverage prior to execution of this Agreement by City. The endorsements
shall be on forms provided by City or as approved by City Attorney. Any deductible or self-insured
retention over $100,000.00 shall be disclosed to and approved by City. If Consultant does not keep
all required insurance policies in full force and effect, City may, in addition to other remedies under
this Agreement, take out the necessary insurance, and Consultant agrees to pay the cost of said
insurance.
15. STANDARD OF CARE. City relies upon the professional ability of Consultant as a
material inducement to entering into this Agreement. Consultant agrees to use reasonable care and
diligence in rendering services under this Agreement. Consultant agrees that the acceptance of his
work by City shall not operate as a waiver or release of said obligation of Consultant. The absence,
omission, or failure to include in this Agreement, items which are normally considered to be a part
of generally accepted professional procedure or which involve professional judgment shall not be
used as a basis for submission of inadequate work or incomplete performance.
16. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES. The Consultant warrants that he
4
has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for
the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage
fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making this
Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this
Agreement without liability, or, in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or
consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage
fee, gift, or contingent fee.
17. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest
and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree
with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant further covenants that in the
performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed.
18. STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTEREST. If City determines Consultant comes
within the definition of Consultant under the Political Reform Act (Government Code §87100),
Consultant shall complete and file and shall require any other person doing work under this
Agreement to complete and file a "Statement of Economic Interest" with the Clerk of the City of
Rohnert Park disclosing Consultant and/or such other person's financial interests.
19. MERGER. This Agreement shall constitute the entire Agreement between the
parties and shall supersede any previous agreements, 'whether verbal or written, concerning the same
subject matter. No modification of this Agreement shall be effective unless and until evidence by a
writing is signed by both parties.
20. DEFAULT. If Consultant should fail to perform any of his obligations hereunder,
within the time and in the manner herein provided or otherwise violate any of the terms of this
Agreement, City may terminate this Agreement by giving Consultant written notice of such
termination, stating the reason for such termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to
receive as full payment for all services satisfactorily rendered and expenses incurred hereunder, an
amount which bears the same ratio to the total fees specified in the agreement as the services
satisfactorily rendered hereunder by Consultant bear to the total services otherwise required to be
performed for such total fee; provided, however, that the City shall deduct from such amount the
amount -of damage, if any, sustained -by -City by virtue of the breach of the Agreement by —
Consultant.
21. NO WAIVER OF BREACH; TIME. The waiver by City of any breach of any term
or promise contained in this Agreement shall not. be deemed to be a waiver of such term or
provision or any subsequent breach of the same or any other term or promise contained in this
Agreement. Time is of the essence in carrying out the duties hereunder.
22. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be
construed to create and the parties do not intend to create any rights in third parties.
23. ATTORNEY FEES, APPLICABLE LAW AND FORUM. In the event either parry
brings an action or proceeding for damages arising out of the other's performance under this
Agreement or to establish the right or remedy of either party, the prevailing party shall be entitled to
recover reasonable attorney fees and costs as part of such action or proceeding, whether or not such
action or proceeding is prosecuted to judgment. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted
according to California law, and any action to enforce the terms of this Agreement or for the breach
thereof shall be brought and tried in the County of Sonoma.
24. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that Consultant, in
performing the services specified herein, shall act as an independent contractor and shall have
control of the work and the manner in which it is performed. Consultant is not to be considered an
agent or employee of the City and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus
or similar benefits City provides its employees. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this
Agreement, Consultant expressly agrees that he/she shall have no recourse nor right of appeal under
rules, regulations, ordinances or laws applicable to employees.
25. TAXES. Consultant agrees to file tax returns and pay all applicable taxes on
amounts paid pursuant to this Agreement and shall be solely liable and responsible to pay such taxes
and other obligations, including, but not limited to, state and federal income and FICA taxes.
Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any liability which it may incur to
the United States for to the State of California as a consequence of Consultant's failure to pay, when
due, all such taxes and obligations.
26. EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES. Consultant shall not discriminate in its
performance under the Agreement either directly or indirectly on the grounds of race, color,
religion, sex, age, national origin, or other prohibited grounds in its employment practices, and shall
take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during
employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, or other prohibited
grounds.
27. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW: Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal,
state and local laws, rules and regulations affecting the Consultant and his/her work hereunder.
Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant has all licenses, permits, qualifications
and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice
Consultant's profession and to do the work hereunder. Consultant represents and warrants to City
that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this
Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to
practice his/her profession and do the work contemplated by this Agreement.
28. TITLE TO DOCUMENTS. Title to all plans, specifications, maps, estimates,
reports, manuscripts, drawings, descriptions and other final work products compiled by the
Consultant under the Agreement shall be vested in the City, none of which shall be used in any
manner whatsoever, by any person, firm, corporation, or agency without the expressed written
consent of the City. Basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations, and other data prepared
or obtained under the Agreement shall be made available, upon request, to the City without
restriction or limitations on their use. Consultant may retain copies of the above-described
information but agrees not to disclose or discuss any information gathered, discussed or generated in
any way through this Agreement without the written permission of City during the term of this
Agreement or until ninety (90) days after receipt of final payment from City.
29. INTERPRETATION. Notwithstanding the fact that one or more provisions of this
Agreement may have been drafted by one of the parties to this Agreement, such provisions shall be
interpreted as though they were a product of a joint drafting effort and no provisions shall be
interpreted against a party on the ground that said party was solely or primarily responsible for
drafting the language to be interpreted.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK:
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
COUNTERSIGNED:
11► : ►1 1 I_ I"
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
CONSULTANT:
('Title)
(Title)
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF WORK
D
SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
EXHIBIT "B"
COMPENSATION RATES AND CHARGES
CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTANT
I HEREBY CERTIFY that, I am the , and a duly
authorized representative of the firm of
whose address is and that
neither I nor the above firm I here represent has:
a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent
fee, or other consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide
employee working solely for me or the above consultant) to solicit to secure
this Agreement.
b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this
contract, to employ or retain the services of any firm or
person in connection with carrying out the Agreement; or
C) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than.a bona
fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) any fee,
contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in connection
with, procuring or carrying out the Agreement;
Except as here expressly stated (if any);
I acknowledge that this certificate is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both
criminal and civil.
Date
agr\Consult.
Signature
10
City Manager's Office
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and FROM
Members of the City Council
I communications I � -1
*oseh. Netter
City Manager
RE: Study for Removal of Two Wastewater
Ponds on City Owned Property DATE: December 13, 2002
As Council is aware the City is in the process of determining whether the two
wastewater ponds adjacent to the Costco/Rohnert Park Stadium site can be eliminated
or relocated. This plan would facilitate additional acreage for the west side commercial
development in the City's economic development plan.
We are currently working with Redwood Equities (represented by Mr. Ken Blackman) to
develop a master plan for several parcels on the west side of US 101. The City
Attorney is currently working with Redwood Equities attorney Mr. Chris Costin in
working out several details for a purchase/development agreement.
Because at this time we are not able to finalize an agreement due to technical issues
and other terms, the City has solicited proposals from two engineering firms to
determine what requirements are necessary to facilitate the ponds removal or
elimination. Enclosed for your information are two proposals, one from Winzler & Kelly,
Consulting Engineers, and the other one from Brelje & Race Consulting Engineers.
Staff recommends Council's authorization for hiring Winzler & Kelly, Consulting
Engineers to begin the studies necessary to determine the viability of removing or
eliminating the wastewater ponds. It is recommended that Council authorize a cost not
to exceed $20,000 for the research phase of the project, which would be allocated out
of the Wastewater Capital Funds.
Winzler & Kelly was selected as they are currently providing engineering services to the
City of Rohnert Park. This project would be included in Winzler & Kelly services through
Mrs. Toni Bertolero as Interim City Engineer.
This item is being presented now to expedite this project as the west side developments
are the highest priority.
If you should have any questions concerning this matter, please don't hesitate to
contact my office.
t� W IN ZLER KELLY
C 0 N S U L T I N G E N G 1 N E E R S
DEC Ref: P2-2243-03004
December 10, 2002 2Q0�
Mr. Joe Netter, City Manager ��� 0-F a��?l 1T��T PARE
City of Rohnert Park
Engineering Department
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Re: Letter of Interest and Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for the Wastewater Ponds
Relocation Project
Dear Mr. Netter:
Winzler & Kelly is pleased to submit three (3) copies of this Letter of Interest and SOQ in
response to the Request for Qualifications dated November 14, 2002 for this project. This SOQ
was prepared based on the information received in the Request for Qualifications as well as
discussions with City of Rohnert Park Public Works and Engineering staff and a project site
visit.
It is our understanding that the City desires timely closure of the pond site in order to make the
site available for future industrial or commercial development. Winzler & Kelly is uniquely
qualified to perform this work because of the various components involved in this project. We
have in-house environmental staff as well as planning and engineering staff that would work
with City staff towards the City's goals and objectives for this project.
In order for these goals to be met, the existing ponds need to be analyzed as part of the City's
wastewater system, in conjunction with the Santa Rosa Subregional system. The analysis will
consider the City's wastewater system needs that will need to be addressed by eliminating or
reducing the volume of the wastewater ponds.
FIRM PROFILE
Winzler & Kelly is a multidiscipline firm with over 50 years of experience in the design of
infrastructure for municipalities and government agencies. During our growth and development,
we have established a staff of engineers and environmental scientists thoroughly versed in
developing and analyzing alternatives and providing cost effective, implementable design
solutions. Today, we operate from offices throughout California and the Pacific Rim, with our
largest operations located in Santa Rosa and San Francisco.
We provide engineering support services in the following disciplines:
Creative Solutions for Over 50 Years
495 Tesconi Circle, Santa Rosa, CA 95401-4696
tel 707.523.1010 fax 707.527.8679
, www.w-and-k.com
� � � WIl�TZLERSZ,I�LLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Mr. Joe Netter, City Manager
December 10, 2002
Page 2
• Civil/Structural/Mechanical/Electrical Engineering
• Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Engineering
• Instrumentation, Control and Telemetry Systems
• Surveying and Mapping
• Construction Inspection and Management
• Hazardous Material Management and Abatement
• Industrial Hygiene, Lead and Asbestos Abatement
• CEQA/NEPA Compliance and Permitting
• Project Funding and Financing
• Public Outreach
00
Mia
"�NG►NEER%NG
In addition to project assignment in the disciplines listed above, Winzler & Kelly has provided
engineering staff support to municipalities and local agencies on an as -needed basis.
Winzler & Kelly specializes almost exclusively in municipal engineering for cities, counties and
special districts. Because of this, we understand the need to balance the public involvement
process, staff needs and council or board direction when implementing a project.
Because we have completed numerous planning and design assignments, we have developed a
broad range of experience in dealing with engineering problems. Through these many projects,
Winzler & Kelly has developed a strong experience base in dealing with the intergovernmental
and regulatory aspects of facilities planning, design and construction management.
FIRM EXPERIENCE -
The following are examples of similar projects recently performed by Winzler & Kelly. These
projects highlight Winzler & Kelly's experience in projects similar in scope in one or all
elements of the City's Wastewater Ponds Relocation Project.
Subregional Biosolids Reuse Project, Laguna Compost Facility, Santa Rosa, CA
The City of Santa Rosa's Laguna Compost Facility was constructed with a large storm water
equalization pond on the site. While the pond was effective at attenuating peak runoff flows, it
also consumed over an acre of valuable space that would otherwise be available for compost
curing and other uses. When the City decided to expand their municipal composting operation,
Winzler & Kelly performed an optimization study that identified a way to eliminate the pond.
The changes were quickly implemented and the City has benefited from over two years of
trouble-free operation.
WII_TZL.ERSZI<LLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Mr. Joe Netter, City Manager
December 10, 2002
Page 3
Reference:
City of Santa Rosa
Mike Reynolds
(707) 543-3374
Oakmont Water Recycling Plant Upgrade Project, Santa Rosa, CA
Winzler & Kelly completed the design of upgrades to the City of Santa Rosa's remote recycled
water facility at the community of Oakmont. The Water Recycling Plant provided the primary
water source for an 18 -hole golf course within the community.
Our work included study, predesign services, surveys, geotechnical review, environmental
review, final design, public outreach and construction management. The project included a 10 -
million gallon concrete -lined recycled water storage pond and modifications to the existing Golf
Course Pump Station and 18 -inch recycled water transmission main. An optimization analysis
was performed to determine the pond size. Construction scheduling and sequencing was
carefully planned to minimize outages and inconveniences for the customer.
Reference:
Larry Brown
Formerly Deputy Director of Utilities
(760) 723-3992
Brown Farm Storage Pond Expansion, Santa Rosa, CA
Winzler & Kelly completed the Brown Farm Storage Pond project. The project involved design,
bidding, and construction management for increased wastewater storage pond capacity.
The City of Santa Rosa operates and maintains the Laguna Subregional Water Reclamation
Plant. The plant has a design capacity of 18 million gallons per day (mgd) and serves the cities
of Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park, Cotati, Sebastopol, and the South Park County Sanitation District.
The system includes collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater for these communities.
Disposal is accomplished by a combination of methods, including discharge to the Russian River
via the Laguna de Santa Rosa, urban irrigation, created wetlands and agricultural irrigation. To
balance the disposal system, effluent storage ponds with a total capacity of approximately 1,500
mg, are located west and southwest of the City of Santa Rosa. The holding ponds serve as
temporary storage facilities prior to either irrigation or river discharge.
In order to properly operate the disposal system, the City must constantly balance the need for
irrigation against the discharge to the river. Pond levels must be low at the start of the wet
weather season to avoid potential overflows during the wet weather months. However, during
the dry weather season, the pond water levels should be high to provide an ample supply of
_ � WII�7ZLERsZI�LLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Mr. Joe Netter, City Manager
December 10, 2002
Page 4.
irrigation water. This delicate balance has resulted in the need for an additional 90 mg of storage
capacity.
A study was conducted to determine the most economical means to increase the reclamation
system storage capacity. Based on the study, it was determined that increasing the Brown Farm
Pond by 90 mg was the most cost-effective manner to increase system capacity. The project
involved design, bidding, and construction management for the increased storage pond capacity.
Due to innovative design concepts, the project was completed in four months — ahead of
schedule and budget. The City realized a $0.5 million savings and now maintains adequate
storage capacity.
Reference:
City of Santa Rosa
Dan Carlson
(707) 543-3950
City of Livermore Water Reclamation Plant Emergency Holding Basin
Winzler & Kelly completed the Emergency Holding Basin Rehabilitation project for the City of
Livermore. Our scope of work included a providing an optimization study, engineering and
environmental services, and construction administration.
The goal of the project was to repair the existing basin and, at the same time, increase storage
capacity. By deepening the basin, the City economically added capacity without expanding
existing plant treatment processes. The basin was deepened as much as seven feet in some
locations, increasing the storage capacity from 7.5 million gallons to nearly 13 million gallons.
Construction was performed in two stages, keeping the plant fully operational through the
duration of the project.
Reference:
City of Livermore
Ralph Olsen
(707) 373-5236
Hidden Valley Lake Community Services District Pond Closure
Winzler & Kelly is providing engineering services to assist the District in the closure of two
aerated treatment ponds at their wastewater treatment plant. The work includes assisting the
District in obtaining approval from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board,
preparing a water sampling plan, collecting pond sludge data, and meeting with the applicable
_ .� WINZLERSZ��LLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Mr. Joe Netter, City Manager
December 10, 2002
Page 5
agencies. The final product of this phase of our work is the development of a Pond Closure Plan
including an estimate of costs and work schedule to complete the pond closures.
Reference:
Mel Aust
Hidden Valley Lake CSD
(707) 987-9201
PROJECT APPROACH
Winzler & Kelly's (W&K) approach is to provide a study that analyzes and evaluates the
technical issues pertaining to this project. The study will assist the City -in determining the
feasibility of relocating or simply eliminating the ponds so that the site may be used for future
development.
The project essentially consists of three components:
1. Pond size optimization
2. Pump station and discharge pipeline capacity analysis
3. Pond alteration and closure
Pond optimization would be done by analyzing various influent hydrographs (flow scenarios),
then determining the necessary pond volume as a function of pumping capacity. This process
would result in the development of several design alternatives that would provide the needed
redundancy to accommodate maintenance and peak flow events. In the course of examining the
feasibility of different pond configurations, W&K will consider statutes of the State of California
Department of Safety of Dams (DSOD) that regulate design and construction of wastewater
ponds. Our analysis will also include coordination with the Santa Rosa Subregional Plant to
clarify constraints, if any, pertaining to wet weather discharge to the Plant under existing
treatment plant requirements and projected future requirements.
Because the pond, pump station, and outfall sewer comprise a complete system, we anticipate
that it will be necessary to examine alternatives for increasing deficiencies of the trunk sewer.
This might include a combination of rehabilitation and replacement of portions of the sewer line.
Another essential component of the study will be to determine the requirements for altering or
closing the existing pond. Reclaiming land that was once used for wastewater storage often
involves managing the dis 1 of many years' worth of accumulated solids, which is regulated
under the EPA's 503 regulations. W&K is currently performing identical services for the
Hidden Valley Lake Community Services District, where we are helping them reclaim several
acres of wastewater ponds.
_ .�' WINZLERsz,I�LLY
C O N S U L T I N O E N C N E E R S
Mr. Joe Netter, City Manager
December 10, 2002
Page 6
Finally, one of the most important aspects of the project will be to develop realistic cost
estimates and concept design drawings for each alternative. This will allow the City to prepare
their capital improvement budget, while optimizing their financial resources. The result will be a
program of projects that allows the City to redevelop and reclaim valuable real estate for public
use.
PROJECT TEAM
The key team members proposed for this work are shown below. Detailed resumes are included
as attachments to this SOQ.
• Toni Bertolero, Project Manager
• Rod Houser, Project Engineer
• Shishir Doctor, Electrical Engineer / I&C
• Elizabeth Cargay, Pond Closure
• Tami Borton, CEQA
• Marc Solomon, Principal -In -Charge
CLOSING
Thank you for providing Winzler & Kelly an opportunity to work for the City on this important
assignment. We look forward to hearing from you and discussing our qualifications further. For
any questions regarding this Statement of Qualifications, please feel free to contact me at (707)
523-1010.
Sincerely,
WINZLER & KELLY
Toni Bertolero, P.E.
kj
Attachments:
Resumes
c: Marc Solomon, Winzler & Kelly
.. �'�"' tXTIl�7ZLEPISZ.KELLY
C C N S U L T I N O E N G I N E E R S
Antoinette (Toni) Bertolero
Civil Engineer
Experience
Proposed Responsibility Ms. Bertolero has over 20 years of experience in municipal engineering. Her
Project Manager broad experience has been in the area of public works and utilities engineering
and management. She has held the title of City Engineer with the cities of
Benicia and Cotati and has also held the title of Utilities Engineer -Manager for
the City of Benicia Utilities Department. Her experience also includes public
Education outreach and consent building, water supply and contract negotiations, agency
B.S./1980/Civil coordination, permit acquisition, and regulatory agency negotiations.
Engineering, University
of California at Berkeley Related experience includes the following:
• Project Manager/coordinator for the City of Santa Rosa Geysers Recharge
Project. Responsibilities in this $150 million project include being the task
Professional Registration leader for local permits acquisition, local agency coordination, hazardous
1983/Civil/CA materials project assessment and oversight, and right-of-way acquisition
from public agencies.
Grade 4 Water Operator
Certified Project Manager/coordinator for the City of Santa Rosa Incremental
Recycled Water Program (IRWP). This program identifies project
alternatives to be considered for the future disposal of wastewater flows
resulting from increases in population of cities that discharge to the Santa
Rosa (regional) Treatment Plant. The technical memoranda also consider
disposal and treatment impacts resulting from the upcoming California
Toxics Rule (CTR). Study included preparation of technical memoranda
pertaining to project alternatives such as indoor water conservation,
agricultural reuse, river discharge, rapid infiltration and ponds, well
injection, urban reuse, and aquifer storage and recovery. -
• Project Manager for the design of the Cordelia Unit #3 Upgrade for the
City of Vallejo. The Project initially consisted of installation of variable
drives for the existing raw water pumps and the renovation of the
emergency power engine for the pump motors. Winzler & Kelly's
preliminary design led to a more effective and efficient pumping strategy
that resulted in an upgrade, not to the Cordelia Pump Station, but to the
Jameson Canyon Pump Station. Design consisted of electrical
modifications, installation of additional pump and drives.
• Project Manager for the design of the Monticello Pump Station Renovation
Project for the City of Vallejo. The Project is for the renovation of the
City's raw water transmission system delivering a maximum flow of 18.6
mgd. Work includes demolition, replacement of three 200 -Hp vertical
turbine pumps, construction of enclosed pump house and ventilation
system. Work included complex construction sequencing to ensure reliable
operation of facilities during construction. -
• City Engineer for the City of Cotati performing duties of the office,
including capital improvement projects engineering, water and wastewater
BERTOLERO Page 1
�'�'���" �U"Il�TZLERSZKELLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Antoinette (Toni) Bertolero
Civil Engineer
Experience
system planning, and representing the Engineering Division at Planning
Commission and City Council meetings. Responsibilities also include
coordination/negotiations with the Sonoma County Water Agency for -
technical review of water supply ad storm drainage issues, and
development review and representing the Engineering Department before
City Council and Planning Commission.
• Project Manager for the design of the Redwood Drive Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station for the City of Cotati. Project included construction of 2,700
feet of force main and a sewer lift station with two 5 -Hp submersible
pumps. Work included acquisition of right-of-way.
Assistant Project Manager for the City of Petaluma Mainline Railroad
Bridge Replacement Project. Project consisted of the planning and design
of the removal and replacement of an existing railroad bridge across the
Petaluma River. Project involved coordination with the US Army Corps of
Engineers, the Northwestern Pacific Railroad, Northcoast Rail Authority,
and the Golden Gate Bridge District.
• Project Manager for the Llano Pump Station Project for the City of Santa
Rosa. Design of 4,000 Hp pump station that delivers up to 21 mgd of
reclaimed water to the Geysers geothermal steam fields.
• Utilities Engineer/Manager for the City of Benicia responsible for the
City's water/wastewater facilities. Developed and implemented facilities
replacement program, capital improvement program and other utility-
related programs (such as pollution prevention cross connection control,
water conservation, water quality and pretreatment). Project representing
Ms. Bertolero's past experience for the City of Benicia are listed below:
Wastewater Treatment Expansion Project. Project included the planning
and design of a $25 million wastewater treatment plant expansion for the
City of Benicia. Improvements consisted of two new activated sludge
aeration basins, two new clarifiers, a new digester, a new dissolved air
flotation thickener, odor control improvements, and a new
operations/maintenance/administration building.
Water Treatment Plant Expansion. $6 million water treatment plant
expansion construction project. Improvements included a new
sedimentation basin and new GAC filters.
Seismic Retrofit Project. Project included the planning, design, and
construction of $1 million interior recoating and seismic retrofit of 2.2 MG
so uncier ouaget �iirst pnase or reservoir improvement
program).
BERTOLERO Page 2
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Antoinette (Toni) Bertolero
Civil Engineer
Experience
Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade. Project consisted of the design and
construction of a $4 million wastewater treatment plant upgrade.
Improvements included installation of a new secondary unit (rotating
biological contactors) and a gravity thickener.
Successfully promoted and acquired water quality testing and monitoring
of source water for North Bay Aqueduct users through the Municipal
Water Quality Investigation Committee.
BERTOLERO Page 3
��TINZLERsZTZELL`Y
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Rodman R. Houser
Civil Engineer
Proposed Responsibility
Project Engineer
Education
B.S./1992/Civil
Engineering, University
of California, Davis with a
minor in mathematics
Professional Registration
CiviVCA/#54215
HOUSER
Experience
Mr. Houser is a licensed civil engineer with broad experience in water
distribution network modeling, pump station design and process control. He is
also experienced with linear and nonlinear programming, dynamic programming
and other tools used in process optimization. Mr. Houser's experience in water
and wastewater spans all phases of project development including planning,
design and construction management of major wastewater and reclaimed water
infrastructure.
He has recently. completed the following pump station and pipeline projects:
• City of Santa Rosa, Compost Facility, CA. Served as project engineer on a
series of tasks including construction management of a biosolids composting
facility, preparation of operations and annual maintenance for biosolids
composting facility.
Project Manager for the design of the Llano Pump Station for the City of
Santa Rosa's Geysers Recharge Project. The 4,000 horsepower pump
station is sized to deliver up to 40 mgd of reclaimed water to the Geysers'
geothermal steam fields and other agricultural reuse projects. Mr. Houser
was also responsible for developing the project's Facility Plan that
established key design criteria and control strategies for the $130 million
project.
• Project Engineer for the design of the City of Calistoga Wastewater
Treatment Plant Upgrade Project. Responsibilities included overall design
and discipline coordination for the $9 million upgrade project. The design — --- -
includes an extended aeration basin, headworks, filters and disinfection
system to produce Title 22 effluent for reclamation.
Parkland Pump Station, City of San Diego, CA. Project engineer for
design and demolition of an existing pump station and replacement of that
pump station with a new, higher capacity facility delivering up to 7,500 gpm
of potable water. Approximately 1,000 linear feet of 12 -inch pipeline will be
constructed. Once constructed, three other pump stations will be demolished
and a fourth may be rehabilitated to serve as a redundant pressure source.
• Otay Water District 1004-2 Pipeline, Reservoir and Pump Station,
Spring Valley, CA. Project engineer for design of a 10 -inch water main, site
improvements, 1.4 MG steel reservoir with a recirculation pump station and
disinfection facility to replace an existing 0.3 MG tank.
City of Milpitas, CA. As Staff Engineer, prepared hydraulic calculations and
pump selection for the Zones 1 and 2A Pump Stations comprising 4,000
horsepower of pumping capacity and over ten million gallons of reservoir
storage. Automated controls for five engine -driven split -case pumps
comprising 2,000 horsepower of pump capacity. Developed control schemes
.'�' �XTINZLEF�sZKELLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Rodman R. Houser
Civil Engineer
Experience
to optimize demand peak shaving operations and provided engineering
services owning construction and startup engineering.
• Project Engineer for the Dublin -San Ramon Services District's Zone 22
Pump Station. Developed automated process control system to integrate
tanks, pump station, ad bypass systems.
• Mission Bay Development, San Francisco, CA. Civil engineer responsible
for hydraulic modeling of the phased improvements to the City's low-
-pressure water system.
City of Sunnyvale, CA. As Civil Engineer, he conducted hydraulic network
analysis that modeled the City's water distribution system serving over
56,000 residents and incorporated the effects of a reclaimed water system.
The City's existing model was updated using a PC-based network analysis
program and the results were used to optimize the. City's capital
improvement expenditures.
• City of Santa Rosa, CA. Provided civil engineering design and construction
support for the City's new 12.5 megawatt substation at the Laguna
Subregional Treatment Plant.
City of San Jose, CA. Civil engineer providing design services during
construction of a 108 -inch reclaimed water line and prepared complete
hydraulic analysis for the South Bay Water Recycling Program's Effluent
Diversion Project. The facility is designed to convey up to 271 million _
gallons per day to the San Francisco Bay and 84 million gallons per day to a
reclaimed water system.
HOUSER
- _ -�' '�U-1NZLEPISZ��ELLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Shishir M. Doctor
Project Manager
Senior Electrical Engineer
Proposed Responsibility
Sr. Electrical and
Instrumentation/Control
Engineer
Education
B.S./1967/Electrical
Engineering
Sardar Patel University,
India.
M.S./1971/ Electrical
Engineering
North Dakota State
University
Professional
Registration
Electrical Engineering
California # 13224
Colorado # 33992
Connecticut # PEN 22205
Hawaii # PE -10151
Iowa # 7423
Indiana # 10001272
Kansas # 16174
Michigan # 47100
Minnesota # 10965
Missouri # E-2000171058
New Mexico # 14584
Nevada # 14688
Oregon # 18411
Tennessee # 106792
Texas # 87164
T T+.,1, # 1 A A Q4 C
Experience
Mr. Doctor is a project manager and senior electrical engineer at Winzler &
Kelly, Consulting Engineers. He has over 33 years of varied project management
and engineering design experience.
As a project manager at Winzler & Kelly, his responsibilities include serving as
the primary contact for technical matters between clients and the design team.
He is responsible for providing complete and accurate design and construction
documents which meet the client's. criteria and production time line. He assures
that all technical matters for Architectural, Civil, Structural, Mechanical,
Electrical and Environmental, are value -engineered and coordinated and conform
to Owner's objectives.
Mr. Doctor has managed and designed numerous electrical/mechanical/structural
projects for semiconductor production, research and testing areas, DOD and DOE
facilities, pharmaceutical facilities, clean rooms, satellite testing laboratories,
Data and Training Centers and related facility projects. The projects involving
HVAC, SCADA, high purity and medical gas systems, electrical substations,
power distribution systems, security lighting, fire detection, alarm and
'suppression systems, and data / communication systems. He is also well versed
in energy conservation application, cogeneration and emergency power systems.
Representative Projects
Bayer Corp. Berkeley, CA.: Project Manager for replacement of a 2,000 -
liter media preparation tank located in a Class 10,000 clean room with a new
6,000 -liter capacity stainless steel tank. The media tank was equipped with
fill and drain ports, dimpled jacket for heating and/or cooling the contents
and a multi -screw agitator and mixer. The complete assembly was mounted
on load cells and braced for seismic zone 4 loadings. The stainless steel
piping and fill valves for the ambient and medium temperature WFI (Water
for Injection) were modified to match the increased height of the tank.
Calpine Corp., Middletown, CA.: Project Manager for circuit breaker
coordination study, Unit 12. Time -Current Curves were plotted for the
circuit breaker solid-state trip units and motor overload relay using the
Dapper and Captor software. Trip unit pickup, short time and long time
delays were adjusted to provide optimal coordination and selectivity for the
200 HP cooling tower motors.
• Calpine Corp., Middletown, CA.: Project Manager for installing an
emergency power feeder to MCC for Unit 13 from the existing 400 -kW
emergency generator unit serving the fire pumps. A manual power transfer
scheme was developed and designed to permit qualified personnel to power
up the selected loads. Mechanical key interlocks and safeguards were
incorporated such that the MCC could not be energized by both the normal or
emergency power source.
DOCTOR Sep -02
.�" �xT1NZLERSZ,I�ELLY
C O. N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Shishir M. Doctor
Project Manager
Senior Electrical Engineer
Experience
City of Calistoga, Calistoga, CA.: Senior Electrical Engineer for the Waste
Water Treatment Plant upgrade project. Efficient process technologies, PLC
control system and project phasing opportunities were applied to allowing
the existing plant to be rebuilt from the ground up, while maintaining
continuity of operations and minimizing rate increases to the customers. The
electrical system comprised of variable frequency drives and energy efficient
motors. The existing PLC based control and alarm system was upgraded to
permit automatic and/or manual control of each process and system.
City of Santa Rosa, Laguna Substation: Project Coordinator and Quality
Assurance checker for the design and construction of the Laguna substation
for the City of Santa Rosa, California. The new facility had to be integrated
with the existing on-site cogeneration facilities and coordinated with the
PG&E 69 -kV transmission line. PG&E had plans to upgrade their
transmission system to 115 -kV. Winzler & Kelly was awarded the 1999
CELSOC Award for this innovative design.
• County of Sonoma, Los Guilucos Juvenile Detention Facility, Santa
Rosa, CA.: Project Manager for the design of a 400 -kW emergency
generator and relocation of an existing 3,000 -gallon double contained, fuel
tank with leak detection. The emergency generator was configured to
automatically start and power the 15 -kV switchgear upon failure of the utility
source.
Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA.: Senior Electrical Engineer for the design of
a Data Center and Training facility at the MP -1 Building. The Data Center
was equipped with vertical racks, for mounting electronic equipment and
termination of data and communication cables (Cat. 5). Clean power was
provided to the equipment racks, via duplex and four-plex receptacles, to
power the electronic devices. UPS and emergency generator were also
provided to assure reliability of power. Each training room had adequate
power, data, and communications jack to support the individual workstations.
Kenilworth Park, Petaluma, CA: Senior Electrical Engineer for the design
of the Sports Complex Lighting. The complex consisted of a varied sport
fields - two football fields, a soccer field, a baseball field, a softball field, and
six tennis courts. Support poles, light fixtures and their location were
selected to complement the sport - aerial or ground level. The total area of -
the sports complex was approx. 48,000 square feet. The design comprised
of installing 50 to 75 foot high poles with 400 to 1,000 watt metal halide
lamp assemblies to provide 20 to 30 FC horizontal illumination and 10 FC
vertical illumination in accordance with IES Standards.
DOCTOR Sep -02
�ZLERSP_J EL Y
C 0 N 8 U L T I N 0 E N G I N E E R S
Shishir M. Doctor
Project Manager
Senior Electrical Engineer
Experience
• San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant, CA.: Project
Manager and senior electrical engineer for Capital Improvement Projects
consisting of.
Replacing 4-350 HP, 5 -kV, 400 RPM, Vertical, motors and VFD drives.
Replacing 4-100 HP and 2-200 HP, 480 -volts, motors and VFD drives.
Replacing two 115 -kV, Circuit Switchers on the PG&E incoming feeders.
Installing a 500 -kW, diesel emergency generator unit.
Replacing 16 RAS Valve Operators.
Replacing a 1,500 -kVA, Freon Filled Transformer.
Installing 118 electrical manhole dewatering sump pumps.
Replacing 480 -volt rated Motor Control Centers A & F.
Replacing double -ended, 4.16 -kV and 480 -volt rated Switchgear lineups.
Replacing the 4.16 -kV Switchgear lineup for 5 engine -generator units and
installing a plant -wide Load Shed System.
Two Rock Elementary School, Petaluma, CA.: Project Manager for the
design and upgrade of the electrical power, HVAC and Fire detection and
alarm system. The school modernization project included roof restoration,
gas heating and electric cooling for each classrooms, replacement of the main
electrical switchboard and complete replacement of the fire detection and
alarm system.
Municipal Utilities. Electrical Engineer for the evaluations and cost
appraisal of Electrical Power generation and power distribution systems for
Privatization. The Electrical / Mechanical system were analyzed to
.determine their condition and remaining life. The complete system and
equipment was then quantified and costed to determine its market value.
Annual operating and maintenance costs of the system were compared to the
anticipated revenue stream generated. The market valuation was then
adjusted to reflect the revenue stream over the life of the system. Decisions
to privatize or continue ownership of the utility/distribution system were
based on the results of this evaluation.
• Miscellaneous Projects
Trained and participated in Value Engineering Studies.
Conducted Life Cycle Cost Analysis.
Prepared Construction Cost Estimates.
Conducted Feasibility studies, -and System Shori Circuit Analysis.
Conducted Utility System studies for generation capabilities, distribution
system network, substation facilities, system fault protection and operational
procedures.
DOCTOR Sep -02
��' WINZLERsZI�ELLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Elizabeth A. Cargay
Senior Environmental Manager
CARGAY
Experience
Proposed Responsibility
Ms. Cargay has completed well and septic system identification on over 42 miles
Phase I Hazardous
of pipeline corridors. She has worked with governmental agencies to develop
Materials Assessment
appropriate well and septic setbacks, worked with clients and project engineers
on design considerations and has field identified, soil tested and designed basic
well and septic systems for construction projects. Her role has ranged from field
inspector to project manager on small and large projects for private and public
Education
sector clients.
B.A./1985/Geology
California State
Ms. Cargay's representative project experience includes the following:
University, Humboldt
• Geysers Recharge Pipeline, Project Assessment, City of Santa Rosa, CA.
Management and
Completed a hazardous materials project assessment and well and septic
Administration of Health
system identification for 42 miles of a tertiary treated waterline corridor
and Safety Programs
study. Project included working with the County Well and Septic Division,
the Regional Water Quality Control Board and property owners along the
pipeline corridor for the identifications, developing pipeline setback
requirements, design standards, construction contingencies and specification
preparations.
Professional Registration
1993/California
Old Town Trunk Sewer Replacement, Phases I and H, City of Santa
Registered
Rosa, CA. Project Area Phase I ESA and Phase II subsurface drilling with
Environmental Assessor
plan and specification preparation along several sewer routes extending
#05300
through commercial, industrial and residential areas, and included over
475 -parcel data review to assess the potential for soil or groundwater
Assistant Radiation
contamination. Nine borings were completed where contamination was
Safety Officer and
identified along the chosen route.
Certification
• Upper Warren Avenue Sewer Replacement, Phase I, Union Sanitary
District, Fremont, CA. Completed a Phase I ESA along a sewer route
extending through commercial, industrial and residential areas to identify the
potential for hazardous materials during construction.
• Lakeville Bridge Construction, Phase I and II, City of Petaluma, CA.
Performed a portion of a Phase I ESA and a Phase II subsurface excavation
of hydrocarbon -impacted soil beneath a bridge abutment.
• Humboldt County Maintenance Stations, County of Humboldt, CA.
Performed Phase I and II site assessments at nine maintenance stations in
Humboldt County where petroleum hydrocarbons were present at all sites.
• Prince Memorial Greenway, City of Santa Rosa, CA. Project included
overseeing the excavation of stream slopes where old batteries were stored
and a landfill was located. Removed lead and petroleum contaminated soil
and hauled soil to several landfills. .
CARGAY
_ ��`' ��TiNZLERSZ,KELLY
C G N S U L T 1 N G E N G I N E E R S
Tamblyn Borton
Environmental Planner
Proposed Responsibility
Environmental Review
Permitting
Education
M.S./1991/Urban and
Regional Planning, San
Jose State University
B.S./ 19 84/Agricultural
and Resource Economics,
University of
Massachusetts
BORTON
Experience
Ms. Borton is familiar with environmental review and compliance at the federal,
state, county, and municipal levels, and specializes in infrastructure planning.
Ms. Borton has approximately eight years of experience managing the
preparation of environmental impact reports (Ellis) under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and environmental impact statements (EISs)
under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Ms. Borton has
experience, facilitating federal, state and local permits (Section 404, Section 7,
Section 1600, NPDES, Caltrans, etc.). She has also performed Phase I
Environmental Site Assessments.
Ms. Borton has several years of experience with planning counter support, design
and architectural review and code enforcement. She has been involved with
several General Plan updates. Ms. Borton is also an experienced journalist, who
specialized in business, real estate, planning, the environment, and related issues.
• State of California. Technical specialist for the siting and permitting of
power plants throughout the state.
• County of Contra Costa. Performed initial review of project applications.
Prepared use permits for subdivisions and residential and commercial
projects.
• City of Vallejo. Staff support for current planning activities. Wrote and
presented staff reports before the Planning Commission. Wrote initial
studies.
• City of Tracy. Recent assignments include Assistant Project Manager for the
Tracy Hills Interim and Permanent Wastewater Treatment Facilities E1R and
Project Manager for the City of Tracy Public Buildings Master Plan Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Prepared numerous initial studies and
wrote portions of several infrastructure° and specific plan EIRs.
• City of Atwater, General Plan Update EIR. Wrote an EIR concurrent with
the update of the General Plan. Issues included traffic, noise, air quality, air
force base reuse, and loss of agricultural land.
• City of San Rafael. Parcel -specific land use research for traffic analysis,
mapping, and General Plan update.
• Town of Windsor. Environmental review and documentation of the Town's
planned infrastructure improvements and engineering projects.
•• City of King. As part of contract team for King City, performed
_ -��' '�xTIl�ZLEI�SZI�ELLY
c o N 8 U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Tamblyn Dorton
Environmental Planner
Experience
• Dry Creek -West Placer Community Facilities District EIR Addendum,
Placer County. Addendum to the 1992 Dry Creek -West Placer Community
Facilities District EIR. Required because of changes in the project
description, subsequent biological and hydrology studies, and clarification of
mitigation. Developed the 'Mitigation Monitoring Program.
• Lassen County General Plan EIR and Final EIR, Lassen County._
General Plan update of 1968 document. Issues: Land use, loss of agricultural
land, wildlife and biology, traffic and circulation, public services, and
utilities. Responded to comments on the EIR and wrote findings for adoption.
• City of Occidental. Wrote comparative environmental analysis for potable
water conveyance and treatment facility alternatives, and prepared and
presented the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the preferred
alternative.
• Modesto General Plan Update EIR, Modesto. General Plan update to
expand Sphere of Influence. Issues included the unavoidable loss of
agricultural land, traffic and circulation, noise, hydrology (potential for
flooding), and air quality.
• Shastic Redevelopment Plan EIR, Redding. Redevelopment plan spans
three jurisdictions (Shasta County, the cities of Redding and Anderson).
Issues: Taking of sensitive species and habitat, disturbance of prehistoric and
historic remains, noise, and seismic activity.
• Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Baptist Church, Oakland. For
refinancing of a Baptist church and school. Major issue was groundwater
contamination.
• Rohnert Park General Plan Amendment EIR and Final EIR, Rohnert
Park. Change in zoning to allow for additional housing. Issues included
traffic, air quality, hydrology, land use, and aesthetics.
• Orange Avenue Landfill Conditional Use Permit EIR and Final EIR,
Fresno. CUP to continue operations following annexation to the City of
Fresno. Issues included groundwater contamination from medical waste.
• City of Clayton. Facilitated plans for 1,400 -home subdivision from
development agreement to building inspection. Served as City representative
for joint powers agreements to facilitate integrated waste management and
stormwater management programs, which had recently been mandated by
state and federal law.
BORTON
, ��' ��T]NZLEF�sZKELLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Mare S. Solomon
Senior Civil Engineer
Proposed Responsibility
Principal -in -Charge
Education
B.S./1981/Civil
Engineering, Duke
University
M.S./1986/Public Health,
Tulane University
Professional Registration
Ci vil/CA/PA/LA/OH/MI
Grade 3 Water Treatment
Plant Operator
Water Distribution System
Operator
Diplomat, Academy. of
Environmental Engineers
Certified Plumbing
Engineer
Memberships
Santa Rosa Chamber of
Commerce: Governmental
Review Committee/
Leadership Steering
Committee/Water and
Agriculture Task Force
Tomorrow's Leaders
Today .
CELSOC: Chapter
President/Board of Prof.
Engineers Liaison
Committee/Business
Mgmt. & Insurance
Committee
AWWA Chairperson
WEF
CWEA
Experience
Mr. Solomon has 20 years of experience in the planning and design of piping and
pumping systems for water, recycled water and wastewater facilities. His broad
project experience has exposed him to all phases of project planning, design,
system modeling, system controls, construction management and operational
reliability. This experience enhances his project management abilities, as he is
able to work effectively with engineers, operators and the general public. Being a
principal of Winzler & Kelly, Mr. Solomon has been involved in all aspects of
design projects from project management to quality assurance. Recent projects in
which Mr. Solomon participated include:
Old Town Trunk Sewer, City of Santa Rosa, CA. Principal -in -Charge for
the City of Santa Rosa to prepare a route selection study to bypass 4,000 linear
feet of failing sanitary trunk sewer. The existing sewer passes through one of
the City's most active commercial/industrial areas. The study included
microtunneling under U.S. Highway 101, a Phase I Environmental Project
Assessment, utility conflicts, required right-of-way acquisition and traffic
control. At the completion of the study, Winzler & Kelly was authorized to
begin design of the preferred alignment.
• City of Calistoga Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Project,
Calistoga, CA. Responsibilities included overall design and discipline
coordination for the $6 mullion upgrade project. The design includes an
extended aeration basin, headworks, filters and disinfection system to
produce Title 22 effluent for reclamation.
• City of Santa Rosa Compost Facility, Santa Rosa, CA. Served as Project
Engineer on a series of tasks including construction management of a
biosolids composting facility and preparation of operations and maintenance
manual for biosolids composting facility.
• Oakmont Recycled Water Storage Pond Upgrade, City of Santa Rosa,
CA. Work included analysis of golf course irrigation needs and water
balance to develop optimal pond size. Final design included the
reconstruction of the storage pond.
• Laguna Treatment Plant U.V. Hypochlorite Disinfection Project, Santa
Rosa, CA..Work included design of a hypochlorite disinfection system to
meet the Title 22 chlorine residual requirements for recycled water.
• Putah Creek Bank Stabilization, Sonoma County, CA. The project
involved emergency repairs to stabilize streambank erosion on Putah Creek.
The stream bank erosion washed out an 8 -inch water pipeline crossing of the
creek and threatened the remaining 10 -inch sewer force main and 12 inch
AoUr, reclaimed water pipeline. Repairs included grading, 1,200 tons of half -ton
AAEE riprap and erosion control facilities. The project was funded by the State
FEMA through the Governor's Office of Emergency Services.
SOLOMON
4�. .,��' `�ZTINZLERSZKELLY
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Mare S. Solomon
Senior Civil Engineer
Experience
• Busk Property Abatement, Santa Rosa, CA. As Project Engineer, prepared
plans and specifications to mitigate illegal grading. on the Busk property. The
design work included excavating and reconstructing existing fills, fill
removal and erosion control. The work was coordinated with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and the USDA Soil,Conservation Service.
• Eastern Dublin Master Plan, Dublin San Ramon Services District,
Dublin, CA. Work included an analysis of water, wastewater and recycled
water demands.
• Eastern Dublin Water System Project, Dublin San Ramon Services
District, Dublin, CA. Work included design of 20,000 linear feet of 14- and
18 -inch potable and recycled water pipeline, 3.5 -MG reservoir and 2,400-
gpm pump station.
• East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland, CA. Solids handling and
treatment facility for Orinda Filter Plant including a 30-mgd pump station
(three 150 -hp pumps).
• Pipe Material Evaluation Study, City of Livermore, CA. Project Manager
for a pipe material evaluation study for a 24- to 36 -inch diameter pipeline.
• Kitty Hawk Road 24 -inch Reclaimed Waterline, City of Livermore, CA.
Project Manager for 24 -inch reclaimed waterline. Project included 4,000 -
linear feet of 24 -inch PVC pipe, 2,000 linear feet of .8- and 10 -inch diameter
reclaimed waterline and pressure reducing valve station, 300 -foot I580 jack
and bore involving Caltrans' coordination and review, innovative and cost-
effective creek crossing, and special coordination with FAA for pipe routing.
• Sonoma Developmental Center, Eldridge, CA. Project Manager for the
water treatment, storage and distribution improvements including 1.0 MG
reservoir.
• City of Cotati, CA. 1 -MG welded steel tank and 4,200 linear feet of 16 -inch
ductile iron pipe transmission main.
• City of St. Helena, CA. Startup engineer for a 2,000-gpm pump station and
2.7 -MG water storage tank.
• Santa Margarita Pump Station, Southwest Division, CA. Work included
study and design for this 20-mgd pump station including six engine -driven,
• Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, City of Cloverdale, CA. Project
Manager for the wastewater treatment plant expansion.
SOLOMON
2
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
Marc S. Solomon
Senior Civil Engineer
SOLOMON
Experience
• Salida Sanitary District, Salida, CA. Land disposal of sewage sludge study.
• East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland, CA. Golf Course Irrigation
Reclamation Study.
• Eastern Dublin Reservoir Storage Project, Dublin, CA. Project Manager
for hydraulic modeling of Dublin San Ramon Services District potable water
system including 8- to 24 -inch diameter pipe, 12 reservoirs, and eight pump
stations. Project Manager for Phase I design, including 10,000 linear feet of
14- and 18 -inch pipeline, reservoir and pump station improvements.
Stormwater/Lagoon Pump Station Improvements Project, City of Foster
City, CA. As Principal -in -Charge, provided quality assurance/quality control
for the $1.25 million replacement and upgrade of a stormwater/lagoon
pumping system. Also responsible for the selection of pumps.
• Odor Control Project, City of Livermore, CA. Project Manager for an
odor control project at the City's water reclamation plant. The project
included an 8,000 cfm Brotower odor control unit and aluminum covers for
the headworks and primary treatment process.
• North Trunkline Relocation, Livermore, CA. Principal -in -Charge for
environmental review, permitting, and design for fast-track relocation of the
City's North Trunk gravity sewer. The project includes relocating 3,100 feet
of 24 -inch PVC gravity sewer at depths greater than 20 feet out of a creek --
embankment, where,erosion had undermined the reliability of the sewer. The
design included coordination with Caltrans and the developer of an adjacent
property where the relocated sewer is to be located.
Engvall Relief Sewer, San Bruno, CA. Principal -in -Charge for hydraulic
modeling and design of improvements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows
in the Engvall collector sewer. The project included hydraulic evaluation of
three collector sewers that combine and cross I-280. The highway crossing
and downstream sewers were undersized to handle wet weather flows,
causing overflows upstream in the Engvall sewer. The design included sewer
replacement and a new highway crossing, including microtunneling and bore
and jack installations. Coordination with Caltrans was critical to the success
of the project.
Napa Sanitation District's North Segment Trunk Sewer. Principal -in -
Charge for the design of this fast-track trunk sewer replacement project. The
design included 1,800 feet of 54 -inch, PVC -lined RCP gravity sewer
adjacent to a railroad track. During construction, contaminated soils were
encountered requiring Phase I Environmental Assessment.
t�
BRELJE &RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
December 9, 2002
Mr. Joseph Netter
City Manager
City of Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486
Subject: Wastewater Pond Relocation
City of Rohnert Park
Statement of Qualifications
Dear Mr. Netter:
DEC I12ov
CITY OF ROi VERT PARK
It was a pleasure to meet with Bill Stevens and Joe Gaffney to review the City's request for
consulting services regarding analysis of options available to the City associated with conversion of
the Town's wastewater storage ponds to commercial or industrial land uses. We understand the City
' desires the selected firm perform a complete analysis of the existing wastewater storage, pumping
and transmission system, considering wide ranging flow scenarios reflecting current flows and future
—' projections.—Recommendations would-be,derived-from_the analysis -to -serve- s-abasis for he .ityto
move ahead with conversion of the ponds to a more cost-effective use.
_ _We were fortunate to have the opportunity_to speak with George Koetke regarding the operation_ of
the City's wastewater pump station. George made several insightful and revealing comments about
past operation of the facility. His considerable experience will be of great value during the analysis
and subsequent design of a project.
The required elements of the necessary engineering work are familiar to Brelje & Race. We have
' recently analyzed and designed a 15 million gallon per day influent wastewater pump station for the
Town of Windsor. Completed in 2001, the pump.station serves the entire town. A component of
that design included ponds that are utilized during high flows for storage of wastewater in the same
' fashion as the City's ponds. Another component of the Town's system included the design of a 5 -
mile long, 20 -inch diameter effluent force main.
We view the Rohnert Park project as a great opportunity to apply our firm's talent and expertise.
The Brelje & Race principals and staff who have prior experience with like projects would be
available to participate in the City's current project an our principa s would rec y manage the
work.
W.• I W I PRMI6-02121 Orohn enpark doe
5.570 SKYLANE BLVD., SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 PHONE: 707/576-1322 FAX: 707/576-0469
We have attached a list of "project notes" that could serve as a starting point for an investigation and
analysis on this project. We often use the "project notes" method as a preliminary design tool to
begin an outline for an initial project meeting, solicit input from members of our staff with special
expertise in a given area or to gather information from City staff. The notes are rough and backed by
the general thought: "write down everything you thinkyou might need to known now". Refinements
are incorporated as information is developed and more ideas emerge. The information would
eventuallybe rearranged into a report or become the design criterion for a preliminary plan. We have
attached our company profile, resumes, services rate schedule and past letters of recommendation.
We have enjoyed working with the City on the development, design and construction of the recently
completed water storage tank projects located on Maple and Manor and at Well 24. We would
sincerely welcome the opportunity to repeat that experience.
Our thanks to Mr. Stevens and Mr. Koetke for their assistance and our congratulations and best
wishes to Mr. Gaffney on his retirement from the City.
Very truly yours,
IBRELJE & RACE
chard Ingram
enclosures
t
IW.•IWlPR1M6-021210rohnertparkdoc
11
n
0
0
M
co
BRELJE & RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
COMPANY PROFILE
I Brelje ' & Race, Consulting Civil Engineers, has been providing engineering, surveying and
planning services in the North Bay Area for more than 40 years. Clients have included public
agencies, land developers, utility companies, construction contractors, institutions and
I geothermal developers. The firm takes particular pride in the fact that it continues to serve
clients 25 years or more after their original projects were completed. A broad mix of clients and
projects and the long history of service in the area have allowed Brelje & Race to develop a
unique understanding of the issues involved in developing successful projects in an environment
of competing interests.
Brelje & Race offers a full range of services across a broad range of disciplines applicable to
public works projects, including preparation of feasibility and project reports; environmental
review documents; design and construction surveying; land surveying and right-of-way and
easement documents; construction plans and specifications; construction inspection and contract
administration; preparation of operation and maintenance manuals and instruction on their use.
The offices of Brelje & Race are located five miles north of Santa Rosa near the Sonoma
' County Airport. The Brelje & Race staff presently includes 15 civil engineers, 1 mechanical
engineer, 3 licensed land surveyors, 2 professional planners, and a supporting group of drafters,
construction inspectors, surveyors, and clerical personnel. The organization is extremely stable.
' Most of the key people have been with the firm for ten years or more.
Although Brelje & Race is predominantly known as a civil engineering firm, the company has
maintained its own professional planning staff for over 20 years and has become recognized for
1 its expertise in the preparation of environmental review documents, particularly Initial Studies,
as prescribed by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The environmental work
performed by Brelje & Race is predominantly related to the review and analysis of public works
—� projects.—The-daily-interaction between engineers and planners-at-Brelje-&-Race-provides-an
opportunity for the sharing of ideas and perspectives. This type of interaction leads to project
designs that encompass both sound engineering practices and a respect for natural resources.
' Brelje & Race has significant experience with the design of water and wastewater storage
reservoirs, pump stations and transmission piping systems. Over the past five years we have
' designed and administered construction for 21 new water storage reservoirs alone. Brelje &
Race principals Richard Ingram and Tom Yokoi have acted as
project managers on numerous projects that are similar to the
Rohnert Park Wastewater Pond Relocation Project. Most all
projects involved permit acquisition and environmental
processing. Many of the projects faced some level of public ,
controversy. All projects were completed under the direction
' of one of the principals of Brelje & Race. The following
"Relevant Experience" section includes projects that illustrate
the--gwdifieafims. These—partir.War—projects-.were
undertaken for the City of Santa Rosa, City of Rohnert Park
and the Town of Windsor.
1
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
CITY OF SANTA ROSA - WEST COTATI RECLAMATION PIPELINE
In early 1996, Brelje & Race was retained by the City for preliminary design, final design, and
construction management services for the West Cotati Reclamation Pipeline Project. The
project involved the installation of approximately 17,000 feet of 16 -inch reclaimed water
transmission main from the City's Poncia Pond Pump Station to an impoundment constructed
by Gallo at a vineyard site southwest of Cotati. The project was planned designed, and
constructed all within the same year, (including environmental review and permit acquisition)
ahead of schedule and at a construction cost of $0.9 million, significantly under, the preliminary
` cost estimate.
Richard Ingram was the project manager, Norman Amidon was the project engineer. David
' Long and Norman Amidon served as resident engineers. Taber Consultants was the
geotechnical engineer.
' Reference: Dan Carlson, Utilities Capital Projects Coordinator
(707) 543-3944
WATER STORAGE TANKS — FOR CITY OF ROHNERT PARK (1 99B)
With the intent of supplementing its water storage capabilities, the City of Rohnert Park entered
into a contract with Brelje &Race for the design of new
storage reservoirs. The resulting project consisted of
construction of two welded steel water storage tanks, with
individual capacities of 1.3 MG and 0.7 MG. The new 1.3 MG
tank is a low profile above -ground tank constructed at a site
within a developing residential neighborhood. A landscaped
' mound was constructed from excess excavates matenal,. i ne
top of the tank is no higher than existing trees along an adjacent
railroad right-of-way. The new 0.7 MG tank has been
-� constructed -on-an-isolated-parcel-in -the-back-portion _of_a
businesspark The top of the tank is no higher than adjacent
business park buildings. Both tanks were equipped with cathodic
protection.
A booster pump station with variable frequency drives, pressure sustaining control valves and
an emergency generator have been constructed at each tank site. The generator and controls
' were housed in a block building to attenuate noise. The generator and control system at the ..
business park site also include provisions to power an existing water supply well located on the
site.
' Tom Yokoi was the project manager and Norman Amidon was the project engineer. Taber
Consultants served as the geotechnical engineer.
1 Reference: Joe Gaffney, Former City Engineer
X7077-Sg&,2230
New 1.3 million gallon tankfor the City of
Rohnert Park designed by Brelje & Race.
r�
I
•WINDSOR WATER DISTRICT (NOW THE TOWN OF WINDSOR) PHASE 1 -A
RECLAIMED WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN AND PUMP STATION
Pursuant to the Windsor Water District's Wastewater Master Plan, Brelje & Race designed and
the District ultimately constructed the Phase 1-A Reclaimed Water Transmission Main and
Pump Station. Improvements included a pump station with capacity to pump up to 10 million
gallons per day. The transmission main totaled approximately 27,000 lineal feet of 20 -inch
diameter pipe. The pipeline extended from the Treatment Plant generally within public
roadways, with the exception of a 4,000 foot section within a Sonoma County Water Agency
' access easement along Windsor Creek. The pipeline terminated at a concrete outfall structure
within Mark West Creek. In addition to engineering design services, Brelje & Race also
provided design surveying, construction staking and construction observation services. The
' project was completed in 1992.
Richard Ingram was the project manager and primary design engineer for this project.
Reference: John Johnson, Operations Manager
(707) 838-1006
TOWN OF WINDSOR INFLUENT PUMP STATION
' In accordance with recommendations contained within the Town of Windsor Master Plan . for
Water Reclamation, Brelje & Race designed a new influent pump station for the Town. The
project, entitled Wastewater Reclamation Facilities Expansion, Phase II, Stage 1, included the
construction of a pump station with a capacity approximately 15 million gallons per day. Six
variable frequency drive self priming centrifugal pumps are housed indoors in a dry pit. The
project included the design of an emergency power generation facility, fuel tanks, dual
to-reema-m-s-wiffi automated controisandlxv i g and metering station 612t direact's flow to Iflue,
treatment plant or to high flow storage ponds. The pump station building includes a bridge
crane for easy removal for servicing of pumps and motors. In addition to design engineering,
Brelje &Race also provided design surveying, construction staking and engineering services
during construction. The project was completed in 2000.
' Richard Ingram was the project manager and primary design engineer for this project.
Reference: John Johnson, Operations Manager
(707) 838-1006 - - - - --- _ - -
1
� s �
P LIC jj
C EN(
W er and ,
las Y
S. Lc
C les I
can JI
S Y,
ich D'T
C
Ti
dote: N hers in
J treatment
drainage,
PE (30)
PE (25)
i, PE (18)
on, PE (9)
or, PE (5)
er, PE (25)_
e, PE (7)
ey, PE (6)
maso, ME (13)
enas (2)
Basaran
BREjE&RACE
;CONSULI ING CIVIL ENGINEERS
OMP
PRIVATE SECTOR
CIVIL, ENGINEERING
Site improvements for
commercial, industrial ani
residential developments;
schools and wineries
Thomas Joneg, PE (14)
David Long; PE (8)
i
ENGINEERS
Ken Lombardi, PE (2)
Arthur Ralston, PE (8)
Tyson Robertson, PE (1
John Thompson, PE (7;
Andrew Gilmore
D TECHNICIANS
Henning Juul
James Henry
Lynn Erickson
u Mobley -Swinney
Nancy Pec 1
irentheses following individual names indicate years
PERSONNEL
LAND SURVEYING
Design surveys, topographic
mapping, boundary surveys,
construction staking .
PRINCIPAL SURVEYOR
Lanny Sjoden, LS(35)
SURVEYORS
Charles Deiner, LS (16)
Ted Rollheiser, LS (24)
Barry Noble (19)
Scott Simkins
STAFF
Mary Hiatt
urtney Pastrick
Brelje & Race Engineers.
.PLANNING
Environmental planning, land use
planning and entitlements,
permitting
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
Susan Nelson (20)
FLANKER
Justin Witt (3)
ACCOUNTING STAFF
Ken Cram
Ginger Bonner
I .
BRELJE &RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
1
SERVICES RATE SCHEDULE
' EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 26, 2002
'
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Principal
$110.00 to $ 125.00/hour
Senior Engineer/Surveyor
75.00 to
100.00/hour
Senior Planner
70.00 to
80.00/hour
'
Engineer/Surveyor
65.00 to
75.00/hour
Planner
60.00 to
70.00/hour
Technician/Drafter
65.00 to
75.00/hour
COMPUTER TIME
$25.00/hour
'
COMPUTER PLOT
Vellum
$8.00/sheet
Mylar
$15.00/sheet
'
TYPING AND CLERICAL
$40.00/hour
MILEAGE
$0.45/mile
FIELD SURVEYING
One-man Party
$100.00/hour
(Including GPS Equipment & Vehicle)
-'
Two-man Party—
$172:00/hour
(Including Survey Equipment &Vehicle)
' Three-man Party
(Including Survey Equipment & Vehicle)
' GPS Equipment
OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS
' MATERIALS & OUTSIDE SERVICES
Stakes, Pipes, Monuments,
' Maps, Prints, etc.
$210.00/hour
$25.00/hour
Cost + 15% Handling Charge ,
Cost + 25% Handling Charge
' RateScheduleStd-2002.doc
5570 SKYLANE BLVD., SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 PHONE: 707/576-1322 FAX: 707/576-0469
US
IPRINCIPAL ENGINEER:
B R E L J E &RACE
CONSULTING . CIVIL ENGINEERS
RICHARD INGRAM
BRELJE & RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
' EDUCATION
University of California, Berkeley.
M.S. Environmental/Sanitary Engineering, 1987
B.S. Civil Engineering, 1977
REGISTRATION
Registered Civil Engineer, State of California
' R.C.E. No. 31798
EXPERIENCE
1988 - Present, 1982 - 1986: Brelje & Race, Santa Rosa, California
Project Manager involved with development of Town of Windsor projects including advanced waste
treatment, extended air activated sludge, UV disinfection, effluent irrigation and a comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan for treatment, storage and disposal; prepared numerous reports for Water
Quality Control Board; conducted pilot testing for direct filtration study; prepared improvement plans,
specifications and cost estimates; contract administration and public hearing processes. Project
Manager West Cotati Reclamation Pipeline Project for City of Santa Rosa Utility Department
responsible for project report, design, construction administration, inspection and startup of 3 -mile, 16 -
inch diameter reclaimed water transmission main. Project Manager for Camp Meeker Water Supply and
Water Distribution Projects, including coordination of public hearings, project design, construction
management and state and federal funding for 5.5 -mile water
storage facilities and 7 miles of distribution main.
1987: Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton,-SanFrancisco,-California--- - - - - - - -
Project Sanitary Engineer responsible for preparation of improvement plans, specifications, cost
estimates and engineering reports.
1986 - 1987: Santa Rosa Junior College
Instructor, Engineering Department
1980 - 1982: City of Santa Rosa, Public Works Department
Assist. Civil Engineer for street reconstruction, assess. districts, effluent disposal systems.
I1979 - 1980: Goldberg -Mann Associates, Civil Engineers, Albuquerque, NM
Prepared drainage analyses, site development plans and project inspection.
' 1977 - 1979: MacKay and Somps, Civil Engineers, Santa Rosa, California
Prepared improvement plans for residential subdivisions; chainman/survey crew.
' PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Sncid-Vof Civil En -g veers Water Environment Federation
California Water Environment Association WateReuse
' Wine Country Water Works Association
PRiv IM-INGRAM.DOC
1 5570 SKYLANE BLVD., SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 PHONE: 707/576-1322 FAX: 707/576-0469
B R E L J E &RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
THOMAS K. YOKOI
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER: BRELJE & RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
EDUCATION
University of California, Berkeley, B.S. Civil Engineering, 1969
Member Chi Epsilon Fraternity (Civil Engineering Honorary)
Member Tau Beta Pi Fraternity (Engineering Honorary)
REGISTRATION
Registered Civil Engineer, State of California
R.C.E. No. 21863
EXPERIENCE
' 1972 - Present: Brelje & Race, Santa Rosa, California
Primarily involved in the analysis and design of water and wastewater projects. District
Engineer for the Bodega Bay Public Utility District. Principal -In -Charge and/or project
-' eer-for-water-projects-in.Healdsburg,Hopland, Rolnies� Ply, Redwood Vallex, Bodega
Bay, Windsor, Cloverdale, Buckingham Park, Lucerne, Inverness, Valley of the Moon and
St. Helena. Principal -In -Charge and/or project engineer for wastewater projects for the
Bodega Bay Public Utility District (secondary, tertiary and reclamation), Sonoma County
Water Agency (Airport and Forestville), County of Sonoma (Geyserville and Graton), The
Sea Ranch., Cloverdale, Windsor and numerous wineries. A principal at Brelj e & Race since
' 1991.
1970 - 1972: City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering,
' Bridge and Structural Design Division (1970-1972)
Street and Freeway Design Division (1969-1970)
Bridge and structural design including structures for the Terminal Island Treatment facility,
' retaining walls, concrete box girder bridge, concrete slab bridge and bridge abutments.
Design of streets and freeway connections and involved in freeway feasibility studies.
' PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
' American Society of CivilEngineers AffiWcan Water WOM Assoc.
Water Environment Federation California Water Environment Assoc.
Wine r ttntff Watff Wer4s - R^^^
1
PRWRES YOKOL0300DOC
1 5570 SKYLANE BLVD., SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 PHONE: 707/576-1322 FAX: 707/576-0469
PROJECT ENGINEER:
BRELJE&RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
RICHARD DITOMMASO
BRELJE & RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
' EDUCATION
University of California, Santa Barbara
' B.S. Mechanical Engineer, 1979
REGISTRATION
Registered Mechanical Engineer, State of California
R.M.E. No. 22823
' EXPERIENCE
1989 - Present: Brelje & Race, Santa Rosa, California
Responsible for performing engineering design and analysis, and providing construction
' assistance for public works water and sanitary systems. Responsibilities also include
preparation of improvement drawings and specifications for municipal water systems,
' pumping stations for reclaimed water, sewage lift pumping stations and unit process design for
advanced wastewater treatment facilities, as well as assistance during bidding and
construction.
i 1986 - 1989: GEO Operator Corporation, Santa Rosa, California
Production/Design Engineer responsible for providing and supervising layout, design,
specifications, material procurement and construction for steam gathering and condensate
disposal facilities and systems associated with the production of geothermal steam for the
generation of electricity. Additional responsibilities included technical support to field
' operations staff for new construction, retrofit and maintenance activities.
1979 -1986: Union Oil Co. of Calif., Geothermal Div., Santa Rosa, California
Production Engineer responsible for the design, cost estimation, material procurement,
preparation of specifications for materials and equipment, contractor bid evaluation and
technical support of new construction, retrofit and maintenance activities for geothermal steam
gathering systems including disposal systems for steam condensate.
PROFESSION AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Mechanical Engineers Geysers Geothermal Association
Calif. Water Pollution Control Assoc. Geothermal Resources Council
ta i . Wifter En-viromnent Assoc. Amrncan Water orAssoc.
5570 SKYLANE BLVD., SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 PHONE: 707/576-1322 FAX: 707/576-0469
I
PROJECT ENGINEER
BRELJE& 0
RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
SARAH YARDLEY
BRELJE & RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
' EDUCATION
University of California, Berkeley
M.S. Civil & Environmental Engineering, 1996
' McGill University, Montreal
B.A. Geography, 1970
REGISTRATION
Registered Professional Civil Engineer, State of California
R.C.E. 64014
' EXPERIENCE
1997 -Present: Brelje & Race, Santa Rosa, California
EDesign Engineer responsible for evaluation, planning, analysis, design, construction assistance,
start-up, and trouble -shooting of wastewater treatment and reclamation facilities. Responsible
for preparation of reports, improvement plans and specifications, cost estimates, product
selection, analysis of existing treatment plant data, shop drawing review, resolution of design
questions during construction, and preparation of operations and maintenance manual.
Projects include the Town of Windsor Water Reclamation Master Plan; Sears Point Raceway
(now Infineon) water and wastewater system expansions and improvements; Water
Reclamation Joint Use Feasibility Study, Airport-Larkfield-Wikiup Sanitation Zone and Town
_ of Windsor; Town of Windsor Water Reclamation Plant Phase IIA Expansion projects; Camp
Meeker Wastewater Reclamation Engineering Report; Vintners Inn Effluent Storage Pond;
City of Santa Rosa Medica Road Water Main Extension Project. Project Engineer for Town of
Windsor Water Reclamation Plant Ultraviolet Light Disinfection System.
Ma- August, 1996: Brelje & Race, Santa Rosa, California
' Engineering Intern responsible for wastewater treatment facility start-up oversight and
preparation of Operations and Maintenance Manual.
1978 –1995: Wallpaper Installations Contractor
Small.. business owner responsible for advertising, bidding, installation, record keeping,
bookkeeping and customer relations.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Water Environment Federation
C'.alifomia Water Fmirnnment AccnCintinn
WateReuse
Wine Country Water Works Association
PRM/RES YARDLEY.DOC
5570 SKYLANE BLVD., SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 PHONE: 707/576-1322 FAX: 707/576-0469
BRELJE&RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
PROJECT/DESIGN ENGINEER:
EDUCATION
NORMAN K. AMIDON
BRELJE & RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California
B.S. Civil Engineering, 1983
Member Tau Beta Pi Fraternity (Engineering Honorary)
REGISTRATION
Registered Civil Engineer, State of California
R.C.E. No. 41702
Land Surveyor -in -Training, State of California
Certificate No. ZL003017
EXPERIENCE
1993 -Present: Brelje & Race, Santa Rosa, California
Projectand_Design Engineer_for.theSonland, Rol nertP_ark and Redwood Valle_ywater system
improvement projects. Design and Resident Engineer for well, water main replacement and
storage facility proj ects for the Sweetwater Springs and Russian River County Water Districts.
D_esign Engineer for the City of Santo Rosa's West Cotati Reclamation Pipeline Project and for
water main replacement projects for the Valley of the Moon Water District.
1993: Chaudhary & Associates, Napa, California
Resident Inspector, consultant -to the California Department of Transportation for the
reconstruction of Highway 175, Lake County, California.
' 1989-1992: Pacific Underground Construction, San Jose, California
Project Engineer responsible for construction inspection and contract administration for public
works projects, including Forts Baker, Barry and Cronkite sewage disposal systems, Army
Corps of Engineers, Marin County; Brommer Street Sewage Lift Station, City of Santa Cruz;
Silver Creek Valley Water System, City of San Jose; Windsor Reclaimed Water Line Project,
Town of Windsor, California
onoma County Water Agency, an osa, a orma
Resident Inspector during construction of the Oakmont Aqueduct Pipeline Project.
IPRMXRES_AMIDON0300.DOC
5570 SKYLANE BLVD., SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 PHONE: 707/576-1322 FAX: 707/576-0469
PROJECT ENGINEER:
EDUCATION
BRELJE&RACE
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
ANDREW C. GILMORE
BRELJE & RACE
CONSULTING CIvEL ENGINEERS
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California
M.S. Civil Engineering, 2001
State University of New York
B.S. Engineering Geology, 1996
PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
Engineer In Training (EIT-FE) Fundamentals of Engineering, State of California, 2001
IEXPERIENCE
' 2002 - Present: Brelje & Race, Santa Rosa, California
Project Engineer involved in the design of high strength winery wastewater treatment and
disposal systems; study and design of algae filtration systems for ponds supplying golf course
irrigation Water
2001 to 2002: Summit Engineering, Santa Rosa, California
Project Engineer for preparation of Report of Waste Discharge and wastewater feasibility
reports for numerous winery projects; performed water quality evaluation of a multiple -user
wastewater management system; design and permitting for a spray irrigation disposal system
' for secondary wastewater.
2001: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
' Teaching Associate in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department; instructed
engineering students in the process of engineering design and use of AutoCAD.
'1991 — 2001: Irrigation Training and Research Center (ITRC), San Luis Obispo
Project/Research Assistant involved in installation, programming and calibration of a
' demonstration S.C.A.D.A. system for 1TRC training classes; investigated energy conservation
practices for irrigation districts; conducted canal simulations.
— 1999.* ARCADIS Ger—aghty & Miller, Inc., MeMille, New Y or
Hydrogeologist-Scientist 2 for fieldwork performed for governmental and private facilities;
imt z'rpFe atioixrcnif hydr^vsceiolegio data;planned,-exaeuW and-intapreted aquifu tests.
' 5570 SKYLANE BLVD., SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 PHONE: 707/576-1322 FAX: 707/576-0469
Project Notes
Introduction
As described in the Cover Letter that accompanies this Statement of Qualifications for
the City's Wastewater Pond Relocation Project, we have prepared a list of "project notes"
that could serve as a starting point for an investigation and analysis on this project. We
often use the "project notes" method as a preliminary design tool to begin an outline for
an initial project meeting, solicit input from members of our staff with special expertise
in a given area or to gather information from City staff. The notes are rough and backed
by the general thought: "write down everything you think you might need to known now".
Refinements are incorporated as information is developed and more ideas emerge. The
information would eventually be rearranged into a report or become the design criterion
for a preliminary plan.
Project Notes
Wastewater Pond Relocation
City of Rohnert Park
PONDS
• Review alternate pond sites; locations west of the City may generate
opportunities. Review concept of providing additional pump station at new pond
site.
• Discuss potential long-term issues regarding sale of existing pond sites for use as
commercial and industrial development. Will any special soils tests for pond
bottoms be required? Any permits for pond abandonment? Check what was
required for COSTCO development.
Determine a time line for new pond project. Review likely environmental and
political difficulties of creating a new raw sewage storage pond. Identify
regulatory agencies expected to have jurisdiction.
FLOW DETERAHNATION
• Review existing inflow and infiltration studies.
• Acquire historical meter and pond level readings, match those to daily rainfall
ta. Develop-spreadsheet-modeHer-pe
• Determine ultimate population of planning area, review allowable design
I-----population relative -to current approved general -planning documents.
• Discuss past experiences during peak flow situations with operations staff.
IFORCEMAIN / OUTFALL
I• Review reliability tradeoffs — because reliability is now good with ponds, what
would be comparable?
' • Parallel main sizing. Desirable operating range for low flows for forcemains at
greater that 3 feet per second velocity at least sometime during each day. Review
' peak flow pipe design, balancing main size and energy consumption.
•
Investigate operational scenarios' at the Laguna Subregional treatment plant that
' would cause variable head conditions at the downstream end of the exisfmg
and/or planned forcemains. Check worst-case backwater condition at Laguna
I
w:\w\PRM\6-021210rohnert park notes.doc
I• Look into width of right-of-way for pipeline options.
• Piping immediately downstream of pump stations seems undersized: hydraulics
review required. Review hydraulics of 18 -inch crossing of Hinbaugh Creek.
Consider replacement of 18 -inch section.
• Review cost of pipe materials and installation: PVC, ductile iron, cement lined
and coated welded steel, polyethylene.
• Develop piping system curve. Investigate doing field testing of existing main and
compare actual headlosses to calculations for headloss. Determine high headloss
Iareas, look for cost effective remediation.
' • Walk pipeline routes, create photo log.
• What is the pressure limitation of existing outfall main? Determine class of
asbestos cement pipe and installed thrust restraint capability.
• Look into implications of channel crossing at Hinbaugh creek, identify potential
' permitting requirements.
• The existing main is asbestos cement pipe. An alternative that involved removal
' of the existing main may be cost prohibitive because of disposal of hazardous
materials.
• Parts of old pump station are in the process of being reconditioned - could serve
-' as -low -or mid range -flow -pump -station ---need to investigate details.----_.
• Existing 200 hp pumps with VFD's are large compared to actual demand for
' horsepower at average pumping rates and operating at inefficient pumping rates.
Look at overall energy efficiency.
' - • Newer pump station: 3 - 200 horsepower pumps, 2 in operation; operations staff .
has observed flow of about 8 million gallons per day (mgd) during peaks, perhaps
' 1 to 2 mgd in addition going to ponds - need to verify. City reports observing 100
psi at pump station at peak flow.
' • Determine peak emergency power capability. Does it match potential peak flow
horsepower requirements?
' • Explore funding opportunities related to reduction of overall pump station energy
use. Consider installation of premium efficiency motors and utilization of the
exis g pump s a
' Consider using newer pump station for high flows only.
tWAVAPRM\6-021210rohnert park notes.doc
I CITY OF
Ao�;c
SANTA ROSA
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
IApril 28, 1997 69 Stony Circle
Santa Rosa,- CA 95401
707-543-3930
FAX 707-543-3936
Attn: Susan Nelson
I BRELJE & RACE
P.O. Box 1895
Santa Rosa, CA 95402
RE: WEST COTATI RECLAMATION PIPELINE PROJECT
With filling of the Gallo reservoir, the West Cotati Reclamation
I Pipeline Project is now "complete." In my twenty years
experience as a Project Manager for the City of Santa Rosa, this
project ranks at the top with regard to overall "owner"
satisfaction. This was a highly visible project with significant
public awareness and also the City's first "cooperative" project
with private industry (Gallo). Thus, it was even more important
' than usual to stay on schedule and to have minimal "surprises".
Brelje & Race, as the project engineer, did an outstanding job at
completing this job on schedule, under budget, and without
compromise in project quality.
■ Much of the credit for this success rests with project manager,
Rich Ingram. His specific knowledge with reclamation pipeline
projects and his overall experience as a project manager was
' — — - clearly -demonstrated on this -project. Normao Amidon—Jane
Christiansen, Jack Locey and David Long all played key roles in
' making this project an unqualified success.
Congratulations on a job well done!
' Sincerely,
' DANIEL C. CARLSON
Capital Projects Coordinator
' DCC\NELSON.P08
i
ITOWN OF
WINDSOR
Town of Windsor
Public Works Department
8400 Windsor Road
IP.O. Box 100
Windsor, CA 95492-0100
Phone (707) 838-1006
IFax (707) 838-3137
IPrinted on recycled paper.
September 18, 2001
Subject: Letter of Reference
To Whom It May Concern:
Brelje & Race Engineers have been the primary consulting engineering service for
the Windsor Water District/Town of Windsor since well before I became
employed with the Windsor Water District in February of 1991. Through these
years they have designed the water and sewer infrastructure for this community,
they have prepared long term Master Plans for all of the Town's utilities, and they
have provided extensive support services to Town utilities operations staff.
A key element of Brelje & Race's approach in their work has been to work closely
with and obtain input from and work cooperatively with Town staff. They strive
to obtain the benefits of operations history and experiences from staff to be sure
measures are incorporated in their work to tailor the final product to the specific
needs and characteristics of the Town's system. Brelje & Race Engineers have
been a valuable element in the long term planning and design of the Town of
Windsor's utility systems.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
LUa UUiy
OL
hn C. Johnso
Public Works Director
a
"City of
I
IENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT
September 19, 2001
Ms. Sue Nelson
Brelje & Race
5570 Skylane Boulevard
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
Sue:
I It was.a pleasure working with your firm in the design and construction of the two
new water storage tanks for RohnertPark. Tom Yokoi was very•knowledgeable and
personable in developing the relationships with the City and with the contractor.
Tom pointed out several design features that we had not considered in our original
RFP, which resulted in cost savings for the City. I feel that a lot of the credit for
having the project finish on time and under budget should go to the efforts of your
staff in assisting us on this project.
I look forward to working with you and your firm on future projects.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
seph CY 6aff-ney
ity Engineer
Jgaffney@rpcity.org
c: File
1 6750 Commerce Boulevard - Rohncrt Park, CA 94928-2486 . (707) 588-2232 - Fax (707) 588-2238 • www.rpcity.org
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-276
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAFT
APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS TO MEMORIALIZE OPTION NO. 1 AS OUTLINED IN
SONOMA COUNTY WINERIES ASSOCIATION LETTER OF DECEMBER16, 2002
WHEREAS, the Sonoma County Wineries Association has requested an amendment to
its original lease or other documents that would modify the existing ground lease agreement dated
May 12,1992; and
__ WHEREAS, Former Mayor Armando Flores, the City Manager and the Assistant City
Manager met with Sonoma County Wineries Association Board Members and Administrative,
Staff to discuss the Wineries Association ground lease and other terms of its operation; and
WHEREAS, the Sonoma County Wineries Association prepared a letter dated December
6, 2002 outlining several options it would like the City to consider; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Assistant City Manager reviewed the options and
are recommending Option No. 1 for City Council's consideration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rohnert
Park concurs with the City Manager's recommendation of Option No. 1 and directs the
City Attorney and the City Manager to draft documents to memorialize this option as an
amendment to the ground lease or other means.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 2002.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
IH -h:121902 so Co wineries Assn Proposal
City Manager's OfficeI"'se°°°mm
Commuaicatiom
o
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and FROM: osep D. Netter
Members of the City Council City Manager
CC: Steve Donley, Assistant City Manager
RE: California Wine & Visitor's Center DATE: December 12, 2002
A meeting was held with former Mayor Armando Flores, Staff and representatives from
the Sonoma County Wineries Association. The discussion centered around the Ground
Lease and operations of the Welcome Centern/Vine & Visitor's Center. Several options
were discussed with the conclusion that the Wineries Association was not interested in
continuing the retail operation nor the Welcome Center operation of the Center. Their
interest was only to maintain an office operation.
Former Mayor Armando Flores and I requested the Wineries Association outline its
options in writing so that Staff could evaluate each option and recommend to the City
Council what options to pursue. A letter dated December 6, 2002 was received
outlining those options — See Exhibit A.
BACKGROUND
To refresh the Council Subcommittee's memory, and to give a historical perspective for
the new Council Members on the Wine & Visitors Center, the following is provided.
The City of Rohnert Park executed a land lease with the Sonoma County Wineries
Association on approximately 2.1 acres adjacent to Roberts Lake that is owned by the
City of Rohnert Park. This lease was executed by Resolution No. 92-84 on May 12,
'1992. The on i io h
1. The Wineries Association agreed to build an approximate 13,000 square foot
building for a Wine & Visitor's Center. The Wineries Association was responsible for
all the costs of construction, improvements, and furnishings of the facility.
2. The lease term was for a twenty-five year period. For the first ten years the City
would receive rental payments of $3,600 per month which would include an
approximately $1,100 per month rental from the Chamber of Commerce sub -lease.
For the second ten years of the term, the City would receive the greater of $3,600
per month, or ten percent (10%) of the Wineries Association's annual gross income.
For the last five years, the lease amount would be determined by mutual agreement
of the Wineries Association and the City of Rohnert Park based on fair market rents
for comparable properties.
3. The City agreed to contribute promotional funds in the amount of $120,000 annually,
at the rate of $10,000 per month for the first ten years of the lease. This
commitment would end following the tenth year payment, which is scheduled to end
on December 31, 2002.
Page 2
December 12, 2002
4. The lease is a triple net lease which means that the Sonoma County Wineries
Association would pay for all insurance, property taxes, repairs and improvements to
the facility.
5. And finally, in order to support tourism and promote Rohnert Park and the County as
a whole, and to provide available funds for the contribution to the Sonoma County
Wineries Association, the Council increased the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) by
one percent (11%) for General Fund purposes.
CURRENT STATUS
Jamie Douglas, Executive Director and two Board Members of the Sonoma County
Wineries Association called a meeting with Rohnert Park management last year to
brainstorm options for use of the facility. They are currently not happy with the financial
operation of the California Welcome Center, the retail operation or managing the facility
as it currently is structured. They are requesting re-evaluation due to the SCWA re-
focus on its overall goals and purpose.
In this discussion, they provided City management with the Sonoma County Wineries
Associations Welcome Center statement of operations which shows an operating total
deficit of $113,000. Included in this deficit is the ground lease to the City of Rohnert
Park for approximately $45,000, property taxes of $22,000, and an operating retail
deficit of $50,000. These numbers do not include the City's promotional funds
contribution of $120,000_peryear as theyoffset the debt service on the building of
approximately the same amount.
Because of the magnitude of this deficit, representatives from the Wineries Association
are rethinking the focus of its operation. They indicate wine sales are down throughout
the County and operating a retail center is not its forte.
In addition, operating a California Welcome Center is costly as the Wineries Association
is responsible for advertising, signage and other printed materials. They are
questioning the benefits of being a California Welcome Center as the clientele are not
necessarily wine connoisseurs and the facility is becoming a bathroom stop for travelers
on US 101.
Also, with technology advancements such as the Internet, development of websites, etc.
over the past ten years, the idea of a central location for information on wineries, tasting
rooms, locations, etc. seems obsolete. They are finding that the public are mostly using
other sources for information through technical means.
Page 3
K December 12, 2002
IMPACTS ON CURRENT LEASE
In research of the lease agreement, the City is obligated to pay $10,000 per month or
$120,000 annually for the first ten years as previously stated. The first payment made
by the City of Rohnert Park was January of 1993, following the Certificate of
Occupancy. Therefore, the ten year period and commitment by the City of Rohnert
Park would end December 31, 2002. There are no other formal obligations or
commitments to the City of Rohnert Park for providing promotional funds beyond this
initial ten year period. Remember, the ground lease is a twenty-five (25) year obligation
between the SCWA and the City of Rohnert Park.
The SCWA had requested Council's consideration in continuing a subsidy to the
Wineries Association in order to help offset operating costs of the facility. They had
requested a proposal from the City which they hoped would include a subsidy to assist
its operations. This request was brought to the City Council's. attention and it was
decided not to continue the subsidy past December 31, 2002.
Based on this decision, the Wineries Association still has a commitment of paying the
rent as well as operating the facility. If they do not continue, under the conditions of the
lease they would be in breach of lease and the City would have the option of taking over
the facility and the SCWA would forfeit any interest it has in the facility, improvements,
or lease.
Options have been previously discussed, including converting a portion of the facility
into other commercial ventures such as a restaurant, possibly the location of a Trader
Joe's type operation, or other retail outlet operators that would compliment both the
Doubletree Hotel and the surrounding retail center.
The SCWA desires to stay in Rohnert Park at the Center but only maintain an office
operation.
RECOMMENDATION
It is clear that the Wineries Association does not want to continue operating the facility
under the existing ground lease provisions. They have provided several options for the
City to consider. Assistant City Manager Steve Donley and I have evaluated each
option presented.
We recommend Option No. 1 for City Council's consideration.
Option No. 1 would allow the Wineries Association to relocate its office operation into
the southeast wing adjacent to the Rohnert Park Chamber's offices. This space is
approximately 800 sq. ft. The City would agree to free rent for a period of three (3)
years. The Sonoma County Wineries Association would relinquish any rights it
maintains under the existing ground lease. The City would have the sole control and
access to the balance of the facility.
Page 4
December 12, 2002
This option would facilitate the City and its Broker to market the remaining space
(approximately 7,800 sq. ft.) for a restaurant operation or other commercial use without
the restrictions or control of the existing tenant, the SCWA.
The loss in rental would total approximately $36,000 for a three (3) year period. In
addition, under the existing ground lease, the City would forfeit the $45,000 annual rent
from the Wineries Association. But remember, the City is not contributing the $120,000
per year as previously stated.
Staff feels this is a win/win option. The City still retains presence of the Wineries
Association in our community, the facility is turned over to the City for an aggressive
marketing of other retail possibilities, and little negative press is generated.
For the future of the "California Welcome Center," I have approached Mr. Bill Comstock,
General Manager of the Doubletree for his interest in taking over this operation. The
benefit is advertising on US 101 and foot traffic in the hotel. Mr. Comstock is supposed
to get back to me soon.
O'Brien
Watters
&Davl*s LLP
Attorneys at Law
Toni L. Griffin
TGriffin@obrienlaw.com
Honorable Councilpersons
Joseph Netter, City Manager
City of Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Cly' OF PVI -I
December 6, 2002
Re: Sonoma County Wineries Association
Our File No. 2269-4129
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Via Facsimile (588-2274)
and Via First Class Mail
The Sonoma County Wineries Association ("SCWA") is the lessee under a ground lease from the
City of Rohnert Park ("City") of the land presently containing a building built by the SCWA and
occupied by the SCWA (and its subtenants) and run as the California Welcome Center/Wine Center.
The building itself was built. at a cost of about $1.6 million with approximately half of that cost
borrowed and the other half, about $800,000, contributed by the members and supporters of the SCWA.
For approximately the last two years various officers of and the Executive Director of the SCWA have
been discussing with various City officials the SCWA's need for a modifications in the provisions of the
ground lease. As the officers and the Executive Director have advised the City's officials the need for
modifications arose primarily from two things.
First, the concept behind the wine center and California Welcome Center was to bring consumers
to Rohnert Park and to provide information as well as to have retail space for the sale of wine and
related merchandise. This concept has not worked out as originally envisioned. The original lease
contemplated that the sales generated by the SCWA retail location would grow and that both the City
and the SCWA would benefit by that growth and the increased traffic. The original lease contains
significant restrictions on the kind of subtenants and the rent which may be collected from subtenants.
Even though the SCWA has done continuous advertising about its wine center and Rohnert Park
location, the traffic to the Welcome Center/wine center has not been as high as was expected and the
persons making use of the Welcome Center services have not turned out to be likely to purchase wine or
many other items from the SCWA's retail store (where the wines of member wineries are available for
purchase). While this is partly attributable to the economic downturn and to the increase in retail
operations at many Sonoma Count wineries, it is also attributable to a change in the way many people
get their information about travel and about what wineries are in Sonoma County and where those
voice 707.545.7010 l facsimile 707.544.2861 / www.obrienlawcom
Fountaingrove Corporate Centre I / 3510 Unocal Place, Suite 200 / P.O. Box 3759 / Santa Rosa, California 95402-3759
R
Honorable Councilpersons
Joseph Netter
December 6, 2002
Page 2
wineries are located. The Internet has grown significantly as a provider of such information to persons
who have computers or access to computers.
Second, the City of Rohnert Park, itself facing money issues caused by the economic downturn,
has advised the SCWA that the SCWA will no longer receive any TOT funds from the City. Without
funding support the SCWA can no longer afford to operate the facility as it is presently operated.
Mayor Flores, Mr. Netter, and Mr. Donley met -with Ms. Bertran, President of the SCWA, Mr.
Dale, Ms'. De Loach, (all members of the board of the SCWA and the committee designated by the
board to resolve this issue), Ms. Douglas, the Executive Director of the SCWA, and myself on December
2nd to discuss the matter of the ground lease again. It is our understanding that a timeline to resolve the
ground lease issues was agreed to as follows. The matter would be addressed by the new City Council
at a special meeting to be held before the end of the year. A special committee of the City Council and
Mr. Netter and Mr. Donley would meet again with the participants of the 12/02/02 meeting on January
13, 2002.
This letter is intended to outline options which the SCWA sees for reaching a mutually beneficial
resolution. There are two components to such a resolution, what happens in the interim period and the
final resolution.
Addressing the long-term options first, the SCWA has considered the following options:
1. In exchange for free rent for a period of three (3) years on an 800 square foot portion of the premises
the SCWA would relinquish its rights under the Ground Lease. This option has benefits for both the
City and the SCWA. The City would own the building free and clear of the ground lease obligations
and could lease the rest of the building to a restaurant or other sales -tax -revenue -generating client as
well as being able to deal directly with the Chamber of Commerce whose sublease from the SCWA
expires on 1/1/03. The SCWA and the Sonoma County Grape Growers would both occupy the 800
square foot portion of the premises and thus, under this option, both would remain in Rohnert Park.
2. The SCWA would relinquish its rights under the ground lease and would pay rent of $1100 per
month on a month-to-month basis for the 800 square feet referred to above. The SCWA would not
commit to staying for any specific period and, indeed, might leave virtually immediately. The
immediate departure of the SCWA under these conditions would result in press coverage which
would almost certainly be negative with respect to the City and, perhaps more importantly to the
City's interests, would leave the City with an empty building (except for the Chamber's continued
presence should the City negotiate an extension of or a new lease with the Chamber) for an unknown
period of time.
3. The City would agree to an amendment of the lease under which the SCWA could and would rent to
a restaurant or other sales -tax -revenue -generating tenant. The terms of such a lease would provide
that from monies received from the such a new tenant or tenants the City would be reimbursed for
any monies it advances (parking lot study and improvements for example), the SCWA would be
reimbursed for any monies it must pay or that it advanced and the City and the SCWA would each
receive some share of the receipts after such a reimbursement formula. This plan would allow the
Honorable Councilpersons
Joseph Netter
December 6, 2002
Page 3
SCWA to recover a part of its investment in the building and would allow the City to have the
benefit of incremental rental income as well as the benefit of a sales -tax -revenue -generating tenant.
One problem with this option include, that there is presently no new tenant negotiating with the
SCWA, or, per the 12/02/02 meeting negotiating with the City, and it is not known how long the
situation could drag on before a tenant is available. Other problems arise from the difficulty inherent
in negotiating a three-way agreement and from the fact that for fifteen years the City and the SCWA
would both be landlords at this facility, and would most likely require additional negotiations to
address the difficulties of restaurants which fail and the like. The SCWA board is concerned that
such future issues would detract from its ability to achieve the true goals of the SCWA. The City
would also see this as adversely impacting the City's future opportunities with respect to the building
(for example, if a restaurant defaulted the City might decide to use the building for its own offices
were the SCWA not involved.)
4. If the City decided that it would be advantageous to it to sell the building as soon as possible to
generate money for the City, then the SCWA would be willing to relinquish its rights under the
ground lease and to immediately locate space elsewhere and move, in exchange for $300,000.00
which would be due on the sale of the building by the City. The City would receive the sales price
dollars in excess of the $300,000.00. This option allows the City to raise money quickly and also
allows the SCWA to recover some of its original investment in the building.
5. The City could allow the SCWA to sell its ground lease to an investor, a new tenant or another
interested party and to make changes to the ground lease which would allow for the required change
in use. The SCWA could then negotiate directly with such person or entity to see if the new owner
had space available that it would lease to the SCWA. This option has the downside of being difficult
to negotiate between the SCWA and the City unless the buyer/transferee of the ground lease is
known. Our understanding based on both the representations of City officials attending the 12/02/02
meeting and Mr. Rogers' representations to us is that no one has expressed an interest in doing this at
this time.
If the SCWA and the City cannot come to a mutually agreeable resolution the SCWA might well be
forced by the economic times to default on the ground lease in its present form. An agreement between
the SCWA and the City allows both the City and the SCWA to avoid negative publicity and allows the
City to develop and enter into future partnerships in the. tourism community without the cloud of
negativity a failure to resolve might generate.
Addressing the interim period (that is, the period from now until a mutually satisfactory solution is
reached), it is clear that the agreed -to timeline does not allow the parties to come to a mutually
satisfactory resolution before January 1st. As the SCWA has advised the City of its monetary
difficulties in continuing the ground lease without modification and because the timeline to resolve
modifications extends into January, we request the City's confirmation that the it will not consider the
SCWA to be in default of the ground lease during the discussion period. The SCWA requests the City's
consent to the SCWA moving into the 800 square feet referred to above.
In order to avoid the building being dark during the period until a mutually satisfactory solution is
worked out and a new tenant is located, the SCWA proposes that the SCWA would continue to staff and
Honorable Councilpersons
Joseph Netter
December 6, 2002
Page 4
provide liability insurance for the retail store and tasting area. The SCWA would on a short-term basis
continue to operate the California Welcome Center. No payments would be owed under the ground
lease. Profits from the operation of the retail store would be divided with the City. This interim
proposal is intended to cover only January 2003 and perhaps another month until details of a mutually
satisfactory resolution are worked out. However, in the event that the City and the SCWA agree to
option 1, discussed above, the SCWA would be willing to continue the arrangement with respect to
running the retail store and tasting area and splitting profits for an additional reasonable period until the
City found a tenant for those parts of the building and tenant improvements were ready to commence.
Very truly yours,
Toni L. Griffin
TLG:ms
cc: Jaimie Douglas
gASonoma Cty Wineries Assoc\General Matters\Ltr\City of Rohnert Park 12 06 02.doc
Clty of
ROHNERT
911�
6750 Commerce Boulevard
Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486
RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED
CONFIDENTIAL.,
Recycled 1\
/ 30% Post Consmner W�
1
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Rohnert Park, California 94928
MEMORANDUM
CONFIDENTIAL
December 12, 2002
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Betsy Strauss
RE: Wine Center Lease
CONFIDENTIAL
p. Z2-tra.u5;3 X
You have received a letter from the Sonoma County Wineries Association dated December
6, in which five "long-term" options for a relationship between the Wineries Association
and the City are presented for your consideration. The selection of one of these options or
a different option entirely is a policy decision for the City Council. I wanted to take this
opportunity to provide you with some information about the lease with the Wineries
Association:
On May 12, 1992, the City entered into a 25 -year Agreement and Ground Lease with the
Sonoma County Wineries Association for a Wine and Visitors Center. Under the
Agreement the Wineries Association agreed to construct a building on the property suitable
to house a wine and visitors center, and operate the Sonoma County Wine and Visitors
Center at its own expense. The City agreed to contribute promotional funds in the amount
of $120,000 (at the rate of $10,000 per month) "during the first ten years after certification
of occupancy." The Agreement requires the Association to pay the City $3,600 per month,
in rent. The Agreement contemplated that the Association would sublet space in the
building to the Chamber of Commerce. Any subrent received by the Association in excess
of $1100 was payable to the City.
It is my understanding that the City has fulfilled its commitment to contribute promotional
funds of $120,000. The City may terminate the Agreement and Ground Lease if the
Wineries Association fails to pay rent. If the City were to terminate the Agreement and
Ground Lease either (1) the City may retake possession of the property and must pay the
construction lender the balance due on its loan; or (2) the City may retake possession of the
property and operate the Wine and Visitors Association; or (3) the City may accept the
construction lender as a substitute lessee. For your information, the last payment to the
construction lender is due in February, 2003.
(707) 588-2214 1 bstrauss@rpcity.org
-2— December 13, 2002
The letter froYn the Wineries Association refers, on a number of occasions, to the
willingness of the Association to "relinquish its rights under the Ground Lease." The
Wineries Association has the right to continue to lease the property from the City if it
continues to abide by the terms of the lease (e.g. payment of rent, etc.).
Thank you for your attention. Please let me know if you have questions.
4
C=ry Ke.sol • No . 2oo2- 2?7
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 277
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK FOR THE SALE OF
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 143-051-063,143-051-064 (450 CITY HALL DRIVE)
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064 were acquired by
the City of Rohnert Park in 1998 for the purpose of creating a civic center and downtown;
WHEREAS, since the purchase of the parcels, the City of Rohnert Park has adopted a
General Plan, Housing Element and City Centre Plan;
WHEREAS, the General Plan, Housing Element and City Centre Plan call for
development of affordable housing in the area where the city -owned parcels are located;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission's serves the community by
developing public infrastructure and affordable housing;
WHEREAS, the goals of the City's General Plan, Housing Element and City Centre Plan
are met by selling the parcels to the Community Development Commission;
WHEREAS, attached as Exhibit A to this resolution is the Acquisition Agreement;
WHEREAS, and independent appraisal has placed the value of Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064 at $1,335,000;
WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park deems the appraisal's value of Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064 as a accurate assessment of current market values and a
fair return of its original purchase;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rohnert Park
that the City Manager is authorized to execute a purchase agreement and related title transfer
documents for the sale of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19a' day of December 2002.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
D
Agreements
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY AND THE COMIVIISSION HEREBY AGREE AS
FOLLOWS:
1. Agreement to Sell and Purchase.
The Ci agrees to sell to the Commission, and the Commission agrees to
urchase from the ity, the Property, upon the terms and for the consideration set
orth in this Agreement.
2. Purchase Price.
The Purchase Price for the Property shall be the amount of ONE
MILLION THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,335,000).
The Purchase Price shall be paid in cash at the time of delivery to the Commission of a
Edeed conveying the Property to the Commission. The Commission shall pay all
transaction and closing costs related to the property purchase. The purchase price of
$1,335,000 was determined by an independent appraisal performed by Ronald J.
Croker, MAI, SRA on September 5, 2002. The Comirussion authorized this appraisal at
the regularly scheduled July 23, 2002 meeting.
3. Conveyance of Title and Delivery of Possession.
The City and the Commission shall open an escrow with a title company
acceptable to both parties. All transaction and closing fees shall be the responsibility of
the Commission. The proposed use of the property is consistent with the General Plan.
A formal determination by the City of Rohnert Park Planning Commissionursuant to
Government Code Section 65402 will be required prior to conveyance of
title. The
Property shall be conveyed and possession delivered by the City to the Commission
upon delivery by the City to the Commission of a grant deed to the Property in
accordance with the conditions set forth in Section 5 of this Agreement.
Upon conveyance, the Commission shall file the grant deed for
recordation among the land records in the Office of the County Recorder for Sonoma
County.
4. Condition of Title to the Property.
The City shall convey by grant deed to the Commission fee simple title to
the Property. Title shall be free and clear of all recorded or unrecorded liens, encum-
brances, covenants, assessments, easements, leases and taxes, except as approved by
the Commission in writing.
5. Occupancy of the Property by City or Others.
The Property shall be conveyed to the Commission free and clear of any
possession or right of possession by the City or any other person.
6. Permission to Enter the Property.
2 12/18/2002
Prior to the conveyance of title, the City grants to the Commission, its
authorized officials, agents, employees, contractors and contractors' employees the
right of access to the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the
Property, obtaining data and making surveys and tests. All such work performed on
the Property by the Commission shall be at the sole expense of the Commission. The
Commission shall hold the City harmless from any injury or damages arising out of
any activity pursuant to this Section 6.
7. Notices and Communications Between the Parties.
Formal notices, demands and communications between the Commission
and the City shall be sufficiently given if dispatched by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the addresses of the Commission and the
City set forth below:
Commission: Community Development Commission
Of the City of Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Attn: Executive Director
City: City of Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Attn: City Manager
Written notices, demands and communications may be sent in the same manner to
such other addresses as either party may from time -to -time designate.
8. Entire Agreement.
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of
the parties relating to the acquisition of the Property and payment of the Purchase
Price for the Property. It integrates all the terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental thereto and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the
parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. This Agreement is
executed in two (2) duplicate counterparts, each of which is deemed to be an original.
9. Termination of Agreement.
This Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall
terminate upon full payment by the Commission to the City of the Purchase Price for
the Property, and upon delivery by the City to the Commission of a grant deed for the
Property.
The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date when this
Agreement has been signed by both parties.
3 12/18/2002
COMMISSION:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Executive Director
BY
Secretary
CITY:
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
By:
City Manager
ATTEST:
By
City Clerk
4 12/18/2002
LEGAL DESCRIMON OF THE PROPERTY
PSR/AcquisAgmt Exhibit A 1/13/99
' Escrow No. 5149211PB DESCRIPTION PAGE
' Situated in the State of California, City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, and
described as follows:
' PARCEL ONE:
Parcel 2 as shown on the map entitled, ROHNERT PARR PARCEL MAP NO. 107, filed in the
office of the County Recorder of Sonoma County on June 18, 1986 in Book 385 of Maps, at
Pages 17 and 18, Sonoma County Records.
' (143-051-063-000)
1 PARCEL TWO:
Parcel 3 as shown on the map entitled, ROHNERT PARR PARCEL MAP NO. 107, filed in the
office of the County Recorder of Sonoma County on June 18, 1986 in Book 385 of Maps, at
Pages 17 and 18, Sonoma County Records.
(143-051-064-000)
1
1
1
.F•HINESAUGH .REEL
�� nn ea ••f
I ' . t•
o
f A[ .:4
2.r MAPS 40 rte .•
�---r, CITY HALL DRIV[
ao
e
a✓ I r r. 0
te' 'rat•.;
I
• •rwe� ROHNERT PARI: {,S EXPRESSWAY
(iGfllO
fr D(Lt•
l r l(rOTM
0., OI IiC lal lKCOrDf
fN I.r VAL—of IDWD
UL rAAML rar ro'
1
7f At 7 W.I,, AVAD
Y • a
[Ttlt CAM[" I -G-f a,
0,+11. ",(D M+, h I. OM IL[ Ir
T,( dllc( 0< WOW CO. 000 DVT•
11 lSt nr6 (,rr `lo Y -f
ALL Dlr[MS$ r" oe afn.E(7 ut 7ro•4
o rrt, •Ire o(ur•L/ 7•[.er
f•,r rgD t0•Na I4e+ElK7 M /N•t ••,
or M La•!• 7'101re[D /, IrIS W.
\�[� y •[arrral� M( rdrvrl.Y r(l rrr, t••rl
N 7r••[,arr D•r•[ 1•r•M7r Orr •••«.tr
•\ 7•OrY 7Y rf,v[l Y•I I,D N. •1!?•lY D Ir
/oa fot a r•++ • •w( w, furor. Ew..
.aoMef IMM -IS De•n
rrrr .u/uo4,nn. (.urwr ROHNERT PARK
/.a.elro77t7 .M[er.0 /[7(f PARCEL MAP No.101
o,7YVEV•[., •+[.r[r/01 FI II".rl L.•.:'.., ;(.r'.. •. •1 �;[ •.
Important: This Plat Is not a survey. It rc r -in qly ,.
fumiohlMJ as a.00nvN,tenoo to locate t#In land in
1'•.L :.44. ...: :F 1 ..
r9l4lioa to adjoining streets and outer lands and fore. [t•:r«„ .[E.,4,
NOT to guarantee any dimensions, distances,
bearings, or acreage. - • ;
37 w a;e;.�,;j!' E:i '..f�i'S•7Ll'1NG MILENGIMYrR5 —_ -- --•-- -
P
I
OOT y Res& - N o . 40 Z - Z78
____
Miscellaneous I I
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 278 co to:
Conv to:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING A COOPERATION
AGREEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROHNERT PARK TO PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO RANCHO FELIZ MOBILE
HOME PARK TO PRESERVE THE STOCK OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITHIN THE
CITY AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park provides 290 affordable housing units for
very -low and low-income citizens in the City of Rohnert Park;
WHEREAS, many of the most disadvantaged residents within the City of Rohnert Park
reside in the Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park;
WHEREAS, insufficient resources exist to provide necessary improvements to Rancho
Feliz Mobile Home Park;
WHEREAS, at the November 18, 2002 City Council Mobile Home Park Subcommittee
meeting, the need to fund improvements was identified;
WHEREAS, these improvements will substantially improve the quality of life for the
residents of Rancho Feliz and will hopefully assist in the crime reduction efforts;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission's serves the community by
developing public infrastructure and affordable housing;
WHEREAS, the City has the staffing resources available to provide services to the
Community Development Commission to improve Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission is committing $500,000 toward
improvements from its Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds and these improvements are
more fully described in the Cooperation Agreement attached as Exhibit A to this resolution;
NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rohnert Park
that the City Manager is authorized to execute a cooperation agreement with the Community
Development Commission for the purpose of providing improvements to the Rancho Feliz
Mobile Home Park.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19'h day of December 2002.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
to
COOPERATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the day of
20_, by and between the CITY OF ROHNERT PARK (the "City") and the
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
(the "Commission").
Recitals
A. The City Council of the City of Rohnert Park, acting pursuant to the
provisions of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code
Section 33000 et seq.), has activated the Commission and has declared itself to
constitute the Commission (Redevelopment Agency) by Ordinance No. 479, adopted on
July 14, 1987.
B. Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, the Commission is
performing a public function of the City and may have access to services and facilities of
the City.
C. The City and the Commission desire to enter into this Agreement for the
following purposes: Provide improvements to Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park
for the purpose of preserving the stock of affordable housing within the Redevelopment
Project Area.
(1) To set forth activities, services and facilities that the City will render
for and make available to the Commission in furtherance of the activities and functions
of the Commission under the Community Redevelopment Law; and
(2) To provide that the Commission will reimburse the City for actions
undertaken and costs and expenses incurred by it for and on behalf of the Commission.
CoopAgmtCity-RF
The source of the Commission's $500,000 commitment will come from the Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund.
Agreements
1. The City agrees to provide for the Commission such staff assistance,
supplies, technical services and other services and facilities of the City as the
Commission may require in carrying out its functions under the Community
Redevelopment Law. Such assistance and services may include the services of
officers, employees and special consultants.
2. The City may, but is not required to, advance necessary funds to the
Commission or expend funds on behalf of the Commission for to provide improvements
to Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park for the purpose of preserving the stock of affordable
housing within the Redevelopment Project Area. These improvement include, but not
limited to, the costs of security lighting, improving disabled access in common areas,
and removing hazardous trees and obstacles. The estimate for these improvements
are listed in Exhibit A. The Commissions obligation for these improvements shall not
exceed $500,000.
3. The City will keep records of activities and services undertaken pursuant
to this Agreement and the costs thereof so that an accurate determination of the
Commission's liability to the City can be made. The City shall periodically, but not less
than annually, submit to the Commission a statement of the costs incurred by the City in
rendering activities and services of the City to the Commission pursuant to this
Agreement. Such statement of costs may include a proration of the City's
administrative and salary expense attributable to services of City officials, employees
and departments rendered for the Commission.
4. The Commission agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred for
services by the City pursuant to this Agreement from and to the extent that funds are
CoopAgmtCity-RF
available to the Commission for such purpose pursuant to Section 33670 of the
Community Redevelopment Law or from other sources provided, however, that the
Commission shall have the sole and exclusive right to pledge any such sources of funds
to the repayment of other indebtedness incurred by the Commission in carrying out the
redevelopment project. The costs of the City under this Agreement will be shown on
statements submitted to the Commission pursuant to Section 3 above. Although the
parties recognize that payment may not occur for a few years and that repayment may
also occur over a period of time, it is the express intent of the parties that the City shall
be entitled to repayment of the expenses incurred by the City under this Agreement,
consistent with the Commission's financial ability, in order to make the City whole as
soon as practically possible.
5. The City agrees to include the Commission within the terms of the City's
insurance policy. The Commission shall pay to the City its pro rata share of the costs of
insurance applicable to its activities resulting from the Commission's inclusion in the
City's policy.
6. The obligations of the Commission under this Agreement shall constitute
an indebtedness of the Commission within the meaning of Section 33670 et seq. of the
Community Redevelopment Law, to be repaid to the City by the Commission with
interest at five percent (5%) per annum.
CoopAgmtCity-RF
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first
above written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Secretary
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
"CITY"
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Chairperson
"COMMISSION"
CoopAgmtCity-RF 4
EXHIBIT A
Estimated Costs of Improvements
Task Cost Estimate
Security Lighting $8,000
+ Electrical Upgrades
+ Installation of Lighting in Rear of Park $25,000-
+ Installation of Lighting in Clubhouse Parking Lot $10,000
+ Installation of Motion Sensor Lights at Park Perimeter $5,000
ADA Improvements
+ Upgrading Access In Clubhouse, Walkways $125,000
+ Grading And Paving Rear Storage Area To Enable ADA Access $75,000
Removal of Dangerous Obstacles and Trees
+ Removal of Hazards in Rear Storage Area $10,000
+ Removal of Diseased and Damaged Trees (provides partial $242,000
removal of trees, total cost is estimated at $1,300,000)
TOTAL $500,000
Note: The costs listed above are estimates. The budget for each task may be modified
as actual costs are known. The total obligation of the Commission shall not exceed
$500,000.
CoopAgmtCity-RF
City of
ROHNERT
MEMORANDUM
Office of the City Manager
DATE: December 13, 2002
Council: R
Misceuaneous
Communications
Agenda - 0 '
Copy to:
coff to
TO: Joe Netter, City Manager
FROM: Steve Donley, Assistant City Manager cSll�s
4 fa
SUBJECT: CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS FOR CDC BOARD
CONSIDERATION AT THE DECEMBER 19, 2002 MEETING. IN
REFERENCE TO RESOLUTIONS 2002-11, 2002-12, 2002=13,
2002-14, 2002-15, 2002-16
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to provide the Community Development Commission
Board guidance on evaluating the contracts being provided to them at the
December 19, 2002 meeting. Due to a recent proposal by Governor Davis,
inaction on this issue will place $3.2 million of CDC money in jeopardy of being
taken by the State of California.
BACKGROUND:
On December 6, 2002, Governor Davis released his proposals for cuts and
revenue enhancements. One proposal deals directly with redevelopment, which is
the funding mechanism for the Community Development Commission. In his 37 -
page release, he notes on page 27 [Attached as Exhibit A] that community
redevelopment agencies are required to transfer 20% of their annual property tax
increment into a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. He goes on to propose
"that Community -Redevelopment Agencies -be -required -to -immediately -transfer
any balances in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds that were
unencumbered on December 1, 2002, to the State Controller for deposit into the
General Fund." He further states that this action is expected to generate
approximately $500 million in the current year.
Concerning the proposal to transfer funds from Low and. Moderate Income
Housing fund, cities and redevelopment agencies have disagreed with the
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), over the meaning of
the word "unencumbered." HCD looks at funds in an agency's Low and Moderate
Housing Fund, notes that they are not under contract, and concludes that they are
not committed. Statewide cities and redevelopment agencies have pointed out -that
those funds could very well be committed to specific housing projects in the
pipeline even though that are, technically, not yet encumbered through contracts.
For FY 02-03, the CDC has budgeted $3.1 million in housing projects, but none of
these projects fit HCD's criteria of being committed.
The State Assembly Budget subcommittees will begin hearings on Monday,
December 16 to consider the Governor's proposals. The current actions
presented to the Community Development Commission does not guarantee the
State of California will not take our low and moderate income housing funding, but
it does place the CDC is a Stronger position to retain the $3.2 million in funding.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTIONS:
Adoption of Resolution 2002-11: Approval of a Purchase Agreement between the
City of Rohnert Park and the Community Development Commission to Purchase
450 City Hall Drive (the PAL Building Site).
At the July 23, 2002 CDC budget study session, staff presented a
$1,750,000 budget to purchase the PAL site and develop approximately 50-
55 units of affordable and market rate housing on that site in cooperation
with Burbank Housing. During the business portion of the July 23, 2002
meeting, the CDC Board authorized staff to hire an appraiser to appraise
the PAL building site in preparation for acquisition.
At the August 13, 2002 meeting, the Executive Director of the Burbank
Housing provided a presentation to the City Council regarding possible
development options at the PAL building site. Further action on this project
was deferred until the outcome of the election was determined.
Action on this item authorizes the Executive Director to execute a purchase
agreement with the City for the PAL site. The purchase price determined
by the appraisal is $1,335,000. Sufficient funding exists in the CDC for this
purchase and this purchase has been budgeted in the FY 02-03 budget.
-Proceeds-from this -sale -go -to the-City-of-Rohnert Park's General-Fund—A
similar resolution on the City Council agenda provides authority for the City
Manager to execute a purchase agreement of behalf of the City of Rohnert
Park. Development of this site into an affordable housing project provides
the City of Rohnert Park significant progress in meeting its mandated
affordable housing development goals and is consistent with the City
Centre Plan and Housing Element.
Adoption of Resolution 2002-12: Approval of Development Agreement and
Security Agreement between the Community Development Commission and
Burbank Housing for the Purpose of Developing Affordable Housing at 450 City
Hall Drive (the PAL Building Site).
As indicated in the information provided regarding Resolution 2002-11
above, Burbank Housing has been working with the CDC to develop an
affordable housing project on the PAL Building Site. In order to move this
project forward, the pre -development funding and additional financing will
be required. Out of the $1,750,000 budgeted for this project, $415,000
remains available for these expenses. The proposed agreement commits
the $415,000 toward this project. Total development costs for this project
are estimated at $8.4 - $8.7 million. Additional resources from this project
are anticipated to come from federal and state tax credits, federal
Community Development Block Grant funding, and participation by
developers meeting their low income housing goals. The proposed
agreement provides the CDC complete discretion on the release of funding,
consent approval on all work completed, and the right to any plans
produced. This agreement can be cancelled upon the direction of the
majority of the CDC Board.
Adoption of Resolution 2002-13: Approval of an Agreement between the
Community Development Commission and the City of Rohnert Park to Provide
Improvements to Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park to Preserve the Stock of
Affordable Housing Within the Redevelopment Project Area.
At the November 12, 2002, CDC meeting, the CDC Board authorized a
$343,750 mobile home rehabilitation program to upgrade substandard
homes in Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park. At the November 18, 2002 City
Council Mobile Home Park subcommittee, the need to fund upgrades in the
common areas throughout the mobile home park was identified. Items such
as improving disabled access, improving security lighting, and removing
dangerous trees are beyond the financial ability of the park's resources.
These improvements will substantially improve the quality of life for the
residents of Rancho -Feliz -and -will -hopefully_assistin the crime reduction
efforts.
This agreement commits $500,000 of CDC funding to improve these
deficiencies within the park. The improvements will be performed by city
staff or contractors supervised by the city. A similar resolution is on the City
Council agenda authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract with
the CDC to perform the improvements in Rancho Feliz.
3
Adoption of Resolution 2002-14: Approval of a Pre -Development Agreement
Between Mercy Housing of California to Develop Affordable Housing at the
Southwest Shopping Center in Compliance with the City's General Plan and
Housing Element.
City staff was contacted by Mercy Housing to redevelop the Southwest
Shopping Center into an affordable housing project and enhance the
existing retailers on the site. On December 3, 2003 met with Mercy
Housing at the Southwest Shopping Center site and discussed
redevelopment options for presentation to the City Council/CDC Board.
Due to the recent actions proposed by the Governor, staff is accelerating
the presentation of this project concept to the CDC Board and proposes
entering into a pre -development agreement with Mercy Housing to
redevelop the Southwest Shopping Center.
Mercy Housing is a nationwide non-profit organization that has developed
more than 12,000 housing units providing more than 30,000 low-income
individuals and families an affordable home. Due to the complexities and
size of the Southwest Shopping Center, past attempts to redevelop the
Southwest Shopping Center have not been successful. Staff believes
Mercy Housing has the experience to complete the redevelopment of the
site.
The FY 02-03 budget has allocated $500,000 for the purpose of
redeveloping Southwest Shopping Center. The proposed agreement
provides the CDC complete discretion on the release of funding, consent
approval on all work completed, and the right to any plans produced. This
agreement can be cancelled upon the direction of the majority of the CDC
Board.
Approval of Resolution 2002-15: Approval of a Pre -Development Agreement with
Burbank Housing for Scattered Site Housing Development with the
Redevelopment Project Area.
This agreement with Burbank Housing provides pre -development funding
(site analysis, environment analysis, architectural and engineering plans)
for sites that have been previously considered for affordable housing
projects. These sites are: the City Hall Site (6750 Commerce BI.), the
Southwest Station Site (former Boys and Girls Club site), the city -owned
undeveloped two acre parcel west of Food 4 Less. Approval of this
agreement does not obligate the CDC to develop these parcels into
affordable housing projects. The proposed agreement provides the CDC
complete discretion on the release of funding, consent approval on all work
completed, and the right to any plans produced. This agreement can be
cancelled upon the direction of the majority of the CDC-Board—.Staff--
4
DC-Board—Staff -
4
recommends allocating the $400,000 budgeted in FY 02-03 for the City
Centre Mixed -Use Project toward this project.
Approval of Resolution 2002-16: Approval of an Affordable Housing Development
Agreement with Kisco for the Wellness Center Site.
In November 2001, the City Council approved as lease with Kisco to
develop the wellness center site. In the lease agreement, Kisco is required
to restrict 20% of its units (approximately 44 units) to low-income seniors
within the Community. The total commitment of funding by the CDC to
provide these units is $450,000 and $170,000 has already been dispersed
to Kisco. This resolution is merely a precautionary measure to ensure that
the State of California will not be able to take the remaining $270,000
allocated to provide affordable senior housing.
California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board
Reimbursement to Counties for the Cost of Special Elections: The 2002 Budget Act
includes $1 million to reimburse counties for the cost of special elections. The Administration
proposes to revert $333,000 of this amount, which reflects the unencumbered balance
remaining after all pending special elections claims are paid by the Board.
Commission on State Mandates
Non -Proposition 98 Mandate Funding: Consistent with the action taken in the 2002 Budget
Act, it is proposed to continue the suspension of payment for various budget year and prior year
reimbursable non -Proposition 98 mandates, resulting in savings of $769.4 million in 2003-04.
Department of Veterans Affairs
Local Assistance Funding: The 2002 Budget Act provided $2,350,000 General Fund to
provide support to county veterans services offices. The Administration proposes to revert
$118,000 from the funds appropriated for these programs due to the State's current fiscal
constraints.
Local Government Financing
Transfer of Unencumbered Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds to the State:
Community Redevelopment Agencies are required to transfer at least 20 percent of their annual
property tax increment into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for the purposes of
increasing, improving, and preserving low- and moderate -income housing. An estimated
$500 million of property tax revenue that would otherwise be available for schools and other
govemmental functions, if not for the establishment of the Community Redevelopment
Agencies, remains unutilized. The Administration proposes that Community Redevelopment
Agencies be required to immediately transfer any balances in their Low and Moderate Income
Housing Funds that were unencumbered on December 1, 2002, to the State Controller for
deposit into the General Fund. This action is expected to generate approximately $500 million
in the current year. The Administration intends to address the overall policy of redevelopment
agency funding as part of the Governor's 2003-04 Budget.
Shared Revenues
Abolition of Special Reserve Fund for Vehicle License Fee Tax Relief: As part of the
implementation of the vehicle license fee rebate program, a Special Reserve Fund for Vehicle
License Fee Tax Relief was created. This rebate program was replaced with a General Fund
offset beginning in 2001=02 -Only a modest portion -of the $33 -million balance -In -this -Special
Fund is estimated to be needed for rebates attributable to late filers in future years. Therefore,
the Administration proposes legislation to eliminate this Special Reserve Fund and transfer its
balance to the General Fund. This shift of resources will have no impact on the vehicle license
fee tax relief program or local governments, and rebates that may result from late filers in the
future will be funded from the General Fund instead.
EXHIBIT A
CDC R-esoL. No. 2002— ► �
Miscellaneous Imo.
A enda
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-11 copy to:
Cony to:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK FOR THE PURCHASE OF
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 143-051-063,143-051-064 (450 CITY HALL DRIVE)
AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, one of the primary goals and missions of the Community Development
Commission is to develop and maintain affordable housing within the Redevelopment Project
Area.
WHEREAS, Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064 are within the
boundaries of the Redevelopment Project Area;
WHEREAS, Commission staff identified Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and
143-051-064 as a possible affordable housing project and sought out of non-profit housing
developer to develop a project;
WHEREAS, Commission staff began meeting with Burbank Housing Development
Corporation in early 2002 and on April 8, 2002, Burbank Housing Development Corporation
provided Commission staff with a letter formally expressing their desire to develop an affordable
housing project on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064;
WHEREAS, at the July 23, 2002 Commission budget study session, staff presented a
$1,750,000 budget to purchase Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064 and
this project budget was formally appropriated from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund
at the August 13, 2002 meeting;
WHEREAS, during the business portion of the July 23, 2002 meeting, the Commission
authorized staff to hire an appraiser to appraise Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and
143-051-064 in preparation for site acquisition.
WHEREAS, at the August 13, 2002 meeting, the Executive Director of Burbank Housing
Development Corporation provide a presentation to the Commission regarding development
options on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064.
WHEREAS, the purchase price of $1,335,000 was determined by an independent
appraisal performed by Ronald J. Croker, MAI, SRA on September 5, 2002;
WHEREAS, the project proposed by the Commission is categorically exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15332 (Class 3 —
Infill Development Projects);
WHEREAS, attached as Exhibit A to this resolution is the Acquisition Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Community Development Commission
of the City of Rohnert Park that the Executive Director is authorized to execute a purchase
agreement and related title transfer documents for the sale of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-
051-063 and 143-051-064.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19th day of December 2002.
ATTEST:
Deputy Secretary
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Chairperson
ACQUISITION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this _ day of r 200_,
by and between the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROHNERT PARK (the Commission) and the CITY OF ROHNERT PARK (the
"City"
Recitals
A. The Commission is a public body, corporate and politic, organized and
existiunder the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety
Cod
enection 33000 et seq.) to carry out the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment
Plan") for the Rohnert Park Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project").
B. The City is a public body, corporate and politic, authorized by the
California Community Redevelopment Law and the Redevelopment Plan to aid and
cooperate with the Commission in carrying out the Project and ensuring the fulfillment
of the purposes of the Redevelopment Plan.
C. In furtherance of the Commissions activities implementing the
Redevelopment Plan, the Commission and City desire to enter into this agreement to
F,rovide for the purchase by the Commission of certain real property (herein the
`Property") currentl owned by the City. The Property consists of two parcels,
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-064 and 143-051-063. The Property is more
particularly described in the "Legal Description of the Property," attached hereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
D. The Property is located within the City. The Commission is acquiring the
Property for purposes of developing affordable housing units.
E. The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332 (Class 32 — Infill
Development Projects).
F. The Commission has appropriated sufficient funding in its Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund to purchase the two parcels for affordable housing
development purposes.
1 12/18/2002
Agreements
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY AND THE COMMISSION HEREBY AGREE AS
FOLLOWS:
1. Agreement to Sell and Purchase.
The City agrees to sell to the Commission, and the Commission agrees to
Ffrom the City, the Property, upon the terms and for the consideration set
forth in this Agreement.
2. Purchase Price.
The Purchase Price for the Property shall be the amount of ONE
MILLION THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,335,000).
The Purchase Price shall be paid in cash at the time of delivery to the Commission of a
grant deed conveying the Property to the Commission. The Commission shall pay all
transaction and closing costs related to the property purchase. The purchase price of
$1,335,000 was determined by an independent appraisal performed by Ronald J.
Croker, MAI, SRA on Setember 5, 2002. The Commission authorized this appraisal at
the regularly scheduled My 23, 2002 meeting.
3. Conveyance of Title and Delivery of Possession.
The City and the Commission shall open an escrow with a title company
acceptable to both parties. All transaction and closing fees shall be the responsibility of
the Commission. The proposed use of the property is consistent with the General Plan.
A formal determination by the City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission pursuant to
Government Code Section 65402 will be required prior to conveyance of title. The
Property shall be conveyed and possession Tel by the City to the Commission
upon delivery by the City to the Commission of a grant deed to the Property in
accordance with the conditions set forth in Section 5 of this Agreement.
Upon conveyance, the Commission shall file the grant deed for
recordation among the land records in the Office of the County Recorder for Sonoma
County.
4. Condition of Title to the Property.
The City shall convey by grant deed to the Commission fee simple title to
the Property. Title shall be free and clear of all recorded or unrecorded liens, encum-
brances, covenants, assessments, easements, leases and taxes, except as approved by
the Commission in writing.
5. Occupy of the Property by City or Others.
The Property shall be conveyed to the Commission free and clear of any
possession or right of possession by the City or any other person.
6. Permission to Enter the Property.
2 12/18/2002
Prior to the conveyance of title, the City grants to the Commission, its
authorized officials, agents, employees, contractors and contractors' employees the
right of access to the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the
Property, obtaining data and making surveys and tests. All such work performed on
the Property by the Commission shall be at the sole expense of the Commission. The
Commission shall hold the City harmless from any injury or damages arising out of
any activity pursuant to this Section 6.
7. Notices and Communications Between the Parties.
Formal notices, demands and communications between the Commission
and the City shall be sufficiently given if dispatched by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the addresses of the Commission and the
City set forth below:
Commission: Community Development Commission
Of the City of Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Attn: Executive Director
City: City of Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Attn: City Manager
Written notices, demands and communications may be sent in the same manner to
such other addresses as either party may from time -to -time designate.
8. Entire Agrees.
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of
the parties relating to the acquisition of the Property and payment of the Purchase
Price for the Property. It integrates all the terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental thereto and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the
parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. This Agreement is
executed in two (2) duplicate counterparts, each of which is deemed to be an original.
9. Termination of Agreement.
This Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall
terminate upon full payment by the Commission to the City of the Purchase Price for
the Property, and upon delivery by the City to the Commission of a grant deed for the
Property.
The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date when this
Agreement has been signed by both parties.
3 12/18/2002
COMMISSION:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
By:
Executive Director
ATTEST:
By
-AND-
CITY:
Secretary
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
City Manager
ATTEST:
By
City Clerk
4 12/18/2002
LEGAL DESCRIMON OF THE PROPERTY
PSR/AcquisAgmt Exhibit A 1/13/99
y.
' r Escrow No. 5149211PB DESCRIPTION PAGE
' Situated in the State of California, City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, and
described as follows:
I
PARCEL ONE:
III
Parcel 2 as shown on
the map entitled, ROHNERT
PARR PARCEL
MAP NO.
107,
filed in the
office of the County
Recorder of Sonoma County
on June 18,
1986 in
Book
385 of Maps, at
Pages 17 and 18, Sonoma County Records.
'
(143-051-063-000)
'
PARCEL TWO:
Parcel 3 as shown on
the map entitled, ROHNERT
PARR PARCEL
MAP NO.
107,
filed in the
office of the County
Recorder of Sonoma County
on June 18,
1986 in
Book
385 of Maps, at
'
Pages 17 and 18, Sonoma County Records.
(143-051-064-000)
1
III
J-HIFIEBAUGH .:REEI(
4117 ....
ww— ;4-ZA ta
8 Mel am
LOCATION
r )KPS 40
%
YAo
7
4—A
---J. CITY HALL DRIVE
-od
M 7, EL Z
....-W ROHMERT PAR1,;cc%EXPRESSWAY
ILI
"Qmr
ot, I
Ll"T"
orr-AL AlCO-1 It, ........
3m* I.-, .s I
M—11L .0oI m,
,3, .•
- tco-%,- ". o,fl
4 � —ESlo-o
ST.It fS -1 we a- "
• ",to M,.1, II M ILC I -
,,g orrict w IoIctm m-. It PUT -
g . t,nnN. m. -CI—Itttl
pUg: 16MOE� ROHNERT PARK
PARCEL MAP 140-101
fmpmtRrvt: Title pW Is not 8 SUrvey. It is mn q1v
fumlohod 9% a 0onvonlenoo to locate the land In "n
r914KIon to adjoining streets and other lands and
ycyrv.NOT to guaranteg any &mengions, distances, fc-ift'" of L
bearings, or weege,
GRIL ENGINEERS
VAO
cDc Resb(.�lo
Council: X
Miscellaneous
Communications
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-12 co to:
Co y to:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSI
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING A PRE -DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WITH BURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 143-051-063,143-051-064 (450 CITY HALL DRIVE)
AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, one of the primary goals and missions of the Community Development
Commission is to develop and maintain affordable housing within the Redevelopment Project
Area.
WHEREAS, Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064 are within the
boundaries of the Redevelopment Project Area;
WHEREAS, Commission staff identified Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and
143-051-064 as a possible affordable housing project and sought out of non-profit housing
developer to develop a project;
WHEREAS, Commission staff began meeting with Burbank Housing Development
Corporation in early 2002 and on April 8, 2002, Burbank Housing Development Corporation
provided Commission staff with a letter formally expressing their desire to develop an affordable
housing project on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064;
WHEREAS, at the July 23, 2002 Commission budget study session, staff presented a
$1,750,000 budget to purchase Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064 and
this project budget was formally appropriated from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund
at the August 13, 2002 meeting;
WHEREAS, from the budget adopted by the Commission, $1,335,000 will go toward
acquisition Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064 and $415,000 will go
toward fulfilling the tasks outlined in the Pre -Development Agreement;
WHEREAS, at the August 13, 2002 meeting, the Executive Director of Burbank Housing
Development Corporation provided a presentation to the Commission regarding development
options on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064;
WHEREAS, the purchase price of $1,335,000 was determined by an independent
appraisal performed by Ronald J. Croker, MAI, SRA on September 5, 2002;
WHEREAS, the Commission has entered into an Acquisition Agreement with the City of
Rohnert Park for the purchase of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064;
WHEREAS, the acquisition of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-063 and 143-051-064
will make land available for an affordable housing development;
WHEREAS, the project proposed by the Commission is categorically exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15332 (Class 3 —
Infill Development Projects);
WHEREAS, attached as Exhibit A to this resolution is the Pre -Development Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Community Development Commission
the City of Rohnert Park that the Executive Director is authorized to execute a Pre -Development
Agreement with Burbank Housing Development Corporation.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19a' day of December 2002.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Chairperson
ATTEST:
Deputy Secretary
PRE -DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the day of ,
20_, by and between the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK (the "Commission") and BURBANK HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ("Burbank Housing").
Recitals
A. The Commission and Burbank Housing desire to enter into this Agreement
for the following purposes: Develop approximately 50 affordable housing units on two
parcels, specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-064 and 143-
051-063. The property is more particularly described in the "Legal Description of the
Property," attached hereto as Exhibit A.
The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act,
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332 (Class 32 — Infill Development Projects).
(1) To set forth activities, services and facilities that Burbank Housing
will render for and make available to the Commission in furtherance of the activities and
functions of the Commission under the Community Redevelopment Law; and
(2) To provide that the Commission will reimburse Burbank Housing for
actions undertaken and costs and expenses incurred by it for and on behalf of the
Commission. The source of the Commission's $415,000 commitment will come from
the Low and Moderate income housing fund as appropriated in the Commission's FY
02-03 budget.
MAS/CoopAgmtCity-Ag
6/16/99
00000/000
Agreements
1. Burbank Housing agrees to provide for the Commission such staff
assistance, supplies, technical services and other services and facilities of Burbank
Housing as the Commission may require in developing the affordable housing units.
Such assistance and services may include the services of officers, employees and
special consultants.
2. The Commission may advance necessary funds to the Commission or
expend funds on behalf of the Commission for the pre -development of the affordable
housing project located on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-051-064 and 143-051-063.
The pre -development tasks include, but not limited to, site environmental studies, site
engineering reports, architectural plans, engineering plans and specifications,
environmental mitigation and public infrastructure improvements. The Commissions
obligation for these improvements shall not exceed $415,000 without approval of the
Commission. Burbank must receive authorization from the prior to initiating any of the
work described above. In addition, the scope and direction of work performed by
Burbank Housing on behalf of the Commission shall require prior approval of the
Commission. All work performed on behalf of the Commission shall be the property of
the Commission.
3. Burbank Housing will keep records of activities and services undertaken
pursuant to this Agreement and the costs thereof so that an accurate determination of
the Commission's liability to Burbank Housing can be made. Burbank Housing shall
periodically, but not less than annually, submit to the Commission a statement of the
costs incurred by Burbank Housing in rendering activities and services of Burbank
Housing to the Commission pursuant to this Agreement. Such statement of costs may
include a proration of Burbank Housing's administrative and salary expense attributable
to services of Burbank Housing's officials, employees and departments rendered for the
Commission.
PredevAgreement-BH
4. The Commission agrees to reimburse Burbank Housing for all costs
incurred for services by Burbank Housing pursuant to this Agreement from and to the
extent that funds are available to the Commission for such purpose pursuant to Section
33670 of the Community Redevelopment Law or from other sources provided.
5. INDEMNIFICATION. To the full extent permitted by law, Burbank Housing
shall indemnify, hold harmless, release and defend the Commission, its officers,
employees and agents from and against any and all actions, claims, demands, damages,
disability, losses, expenses including attorney's fees and other defense costs and liabilities
of any nature that may be asserted by any person or entity including Burbank Housing, in
whole or in part, arising out of Burbank Housing's activities hereunder, including the
activities of other persons employed or utilized by Burbank Housing in the performance of
this Agreement (including design defects and regardless of Commission's approval, use or
acceptance of the work or work product hereunder) excepting liabilities due to the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of Commission. This indemnification obligation is not
limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation
payable by or for Burbank Housing under Worker's Compensation, disability or other
employee benefit acts or the terms, applicability or limitations of any insurance held or
provided by Burbank Housing and shall continue to bind the parties after
termination/completion of this Agreement.
6. INSURANCE. Without limiting Burbank Housing's indemnification provided
herein, Burbank Housing shall take out and maintain, throughout the period of this
Agreement, the following policies of insurance placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Bests rating of no less than A:VII or its equivalent against injury/death to persons or
damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the activities hereunder of
Burbank Housing, its agents, employees or subcontractors. The cost of maintaining this
coverage shall be deemed a reimburseable expense in performance of the agreement.
A. Comprehensive or Commercial General Liability Insurance at least as
broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence
PredevAgreement-BH 3
form CG 0001), in an amount of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence. If work involves explosive,
underground or collapse risks, XCU must be included. If a general aggregate limit is used,
either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project or the general
aggregate shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Said policy shall contain, or be
endorsed with, the following provisions:
(1) The Commission, its officers, employees and agents, are covered as
insureds for liability arising out of the operations performed by or on behalf of Burbank
Housing. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the Commission, its officers, agents and employees.
(2) The policy shall not be canceled or materially reduced in coverage
without thirty (30) days prior written notice (10 days for non-payment of premium) to
Commission by certified mail.
(3) The inclusion of more than one insured shall not operate to impair the
rights of one insured against another insured, and the coverage afforded shall apply as
though separate policies had been issued to each insured, but the inclusion of more than
one insured shall not operate to increase the limits of the insurer's liability.
(4) For claims related to this project, the Burbank Housing's insurance is
primary coverage to the Commission, and any insurance or self-insurance programs
maintained by the Commission is excess to Burbank Housing's insurance and will not be
called upon to contribute with it.
(5) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the parties,
including breach of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the Commission, its
officers, employees and agents.
B. Automobile liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as ISO
Form numbers CA 0001 06 92, Code 1 (any auto), for vehicles used in the performance of
PredevAgreement-BH 4
this Agreement with minimum coverage of not less than $1,000,000 per accident
combined single limit (CSL). Such policy shall contain or be endorsed with the provision
that coverage shall not be canceled or materially reduced in coverage without thirty (30)
days prior written notice (10 days for non-payment of premium) to the Commission by
certified mail.
C. Worker's Compensation insurance meeting statutory limits of Labor
Code which policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain a waiver of subrogation against
the Commission, its officers, agents, and employees and provide for thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the Commission in the event of cancellation. If Burbank Housing has no
employees, Burbank Housing may sign and file the following certification in lieu of
insurance:
"I am aware of the provisions of California Labor Code Section
3700 which requires every employer to be insured against
liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I
will comply with the provisions of that code before
.commencing with and during the performance of the work of
this contract "
D. Professional liability insurance/errors and omission coverage in an
amount no less than $1,000,000.00 combined single limit (CSL). If insurance is written on
a claim -made basis, Burbank Housing agrees to maintain such insurance in effect for at
least three (3) years following completion of performance under this Agreement.
E. Burbank Housing shall furnish the Commission with certificates and
original endorsements effecting the required coverage prior to execution of this Agreement
by the Commission. The endorsements shall be on forms provided by the Commission or
as approved by the City Attorney. Any deductible or self-insured retention over
$100,000.00 shall be disclosed to and approved by the Commission. If Burbank Housing
PredevAgreement-13H 5
does not keep all required insurance policies in full force and effect, the Commission may,
in addition to other remedies under this Agreement, take out the necessary insurance.
7. Termination or modification of Agreement by the Commission. The
Commission may terminate or modification this agreement at anytime without cause by
written notice to Burbank Housing. Termination or modification shall become effective
ten (10) days after the date of the letter.
8. Termination or modification of Agreement by Burbank Housing. Burbank
Housing may terminate or modification this agreement at anytime without cause by
written notice to the Commission. Termination or modification shall become effective
ten (10) days after the date of the letter.
PredevAgreement-BH
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first
above written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Secretary
PredevAgreement-BH
BURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
19
Executive Director
"BURBANK HOUSING"
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
MR
Chairperson
"COMMISSION"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
PSR/AcquisAgmt Exhibit A 1/13/99
Escrow No. 5149211PB DESCRIPTION PAGE
Situated in the State of California, City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, and
described as follows:
PARCEL ONE:
Parcel 2 as shown on the map entitled, ROHNERT PARK PARCEL MAP NO. 107, filed in the
office of the County Recorder of Sonoma County on June 18, 1986 in Book 385 -of Maps, at
Pages 17 and 18, Sonoma County Records.
(143-051-063-000)
PARCEL TWO:
Parcel 3 as shown on the map entitled, ROHNERT PARK PARCEL MAP NO. 107, filed in the
office of the County Recorder of Sonoma County on June 18, 1986 in Book 385 of Maps, at
Pages 17 and 18, Sonoma County Records.
(143-051-064-000)
1
I q..91NENAUGH CREEI
h,f•t7'0%it—
to.
574 0—m
... CtL I
-CIL
9WIG&W
MAPS 49
M!mo.
T
--A CITY HALL DRIVIIIVII
w I
d
2,
0
EXPRESSWAY
Ro"HERT P4 1,;
D' I
LIt
• 3m".. tn.m 0
IY
IL ...IAL lo- 2-1 co -1
So -o"
.6.1 01 -1
M;=Ll M
o`1.CI V`
ROHNERT PARK
IL PARCEL MAP 140-101
Immmm This ph" is riot a survey. It Is: rflig q1v e. fn 0, OW•
,.r•,1 `, It
fumlohod es a oonvonfertoo to locate tfiti land in
rgletioA to edfoln1mg streets end o1 ter lands and
NOT to guarantee any dSmensions, distances,
bearings, or acreage.
Z' —F., LC C,*m
R
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 13
CDC Regoi. too , bo -a-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING A COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK TO PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO RANCHO FELIZ
MOBILE HOME PARK TO PRESERVE THE STOCK OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
WITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, one of the primary goals and missions of the Community Development
Commission is to develop and maintain affordable housing within the Redevelopment Project
Area.
WHEREAS, the Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park is within the boundaries of the
Redevelopment Project Area;
WHEREAS, Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park provides 290 affordable housing units for
very -low and low-income citizens in the City -of Rohnert Park;
WHEREAS, many of the most disadvantaged residents within the Redevelopment Project
Area reside in the Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park;
WHEREAS, insufficient resources exist to provide necessary improvements to Rancho
Feliz Mobile Home Park;
WHEREAS, at the November 18, 2002 City Council Mobile Home Park Subcommittee
meeting, the need to fund improvements was identified by a subcommittee of the local governing
body;
WHEREAS, these improvements will substantially improve the quality of life for the
residents of Rancho Feliz and will hopefully assist in the crime reduction efforts;
WHEREAS, the City has the staffing resources available to provide services to the
Community Development Commission to improve Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission is committing $500,000 toward
improvements from its Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds and these improvements are
more fully described in the Cooperation Agreement attached as Exhibit A to this resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Community Development Commission
that the Executive Director is authorized to execute a cooperation agreement with the City of
Rohnert Park for the purpose of providing improvements to the Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19'' day of December 2002.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Chairperson
ATTEST:
Deputy Secretary
COOPERATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the day of
20_, by and between the CITY OF ROHNERT PARK (the "City") and the
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
(the "Commission").
Recitals
A. The City Council of the City of Rohnert Park, acting pursuant to the
provisions of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code
Section 33000 et seq.), has activated the Commission and has declared itself to
constitute the Commission (Redevelopment Agency) by Ordinance No. 479, adopted on
July 14, 1987.
B. Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, the Commission is
performing a public function of the City and may have access to services and facilities of
the City.
C. The City and the Commission desire to enter into this Agreement for the
following purposes: Provide improvements to Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park
for the purpose of preserving the stock of affordable housing within the Redevelopment
Project Area.
(1) To set forth activities, services and facilities that the City will render
for and make available to the Commission in furtherance of the activities and functions
of the Commission under the Community Redevelopment Law; and
(2) To provide that the Commission will reimburse the City for actions
undertaken and costs and expenses incurred by it for and on behalf of the Commission.
CoopAgmtCity-RF
The source of the Commission's $500,000 commitment will come from the Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund.
Agreements
1. The City agrees to provide for the Commission such staff assistance,
supplies, technical services and other services and facilities of the City as the
Commission may require in carrying out its functions under the Community
Redevelopment Law. Such assistance and services may include the services of
officers, employees and special consultants.
2. The City may, but is not required to, advance necessary funds to the
Commission or expend funds on behalf of the Commission for to provide improvements
to Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park for the purpose of preserving the stock of affordable
housing within the Redevelopment Project Area. These improvement include, but not
limited to, the costs of security lighting, improving disabled access in common areas,
and removing hazardous trees and obstacles. The estimate for these improvements
are listed in Exhibit A. The Commissions obligation for these improvements shall not
exceed $500,000.
3. The City will keep records of activities and services undertaken pursuant
to this Agreement and the costs thereof so that an accurate determination of the
Commission's liability to the City can be made. The City shall periodically, but not less
than annually, submit to the Commission a statement of the costs incurred by the City in
rendering activities and services of the City to the Commission pursuant to this
Agreement. Such statement of costs may include a proration of the City's
administrative and salary expense attributable to services of City officials, employees
and departments rendered for the Commission.
4. The Commission agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred for
services by the City pursuant to this Agreement from and to the extent that funds are
CoopAgmtCity-RF
available to the Commission for such purpose pursuant to Section 33670 of the
Community Redevelopment Law or from other sources provided, however, that the
Commission shall have the sole and exclusive right to pledge any such sources of funds
to the repayment of other indebtedness incurred by the Commission in carrying out the
redevelopment project. The costs of the City under this Agreement will be shown on
statements submitted to the Commission pursuant to Section 3 above. Although the
parties recognize that payment may not occur for a few years and that repayment may
also occur over a period of time, it is the -express intent of the parties that the City shall
be entitled to repayment of the expenses incurred by the City under this Agreement,
consistent with the Commission's financial ability, in order to make the City whole as
soon as practically possible.
5. The City agrees to include the Commission within the terms of the City's
insurance policy. The Commission shall pay to the City its pro rata share of the costs of
insurance applicable to its activities resulting from the Commission's inclusion in the
City's policy.
6. The obligations of the Commission under this Agreement shall constitute
an indebtedness of the Commission within the meaning of Section 33670 et seq. of the
Community Redevelopment Law, to be repaid to the City by the Commission with
interest at five percent (5%) per annum.
CoopAgmtCity-RF
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first
above written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Secretary
CoopAgmtCity-RF
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Mayor
"CITY"
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
M
Chairperson
"COMMISSION"
EXHIBIT A
Estimated Costs of Improvements
Task Cost Estimate
Security Lighting
+ Electrical Upgrades $8,000
+ Installation of Lighting in Rear of Park $25,000
+ Installation of Lighting in Clubhouse Parking Lot $10,000
+ Installation of Motion Sensor Lights at Park Perimeter $5,000
ADA Improvements
+ Upgrading Access In Clubhouse, Walkways $125,000
+ Grading And Paving Rear Storage Area To Enable ADA Access $75,000
Removal of Dangerous Obstacles and Trees
+ Removal of Hazards in Rear Storage Area $10,000
+ Removal of Diseased and Damaged Trees (provides partial $242,000
removal of trees, total cost is estimated at $1,300,000)
TOTAL $500,000
Note: The costs listed above are estimates. The budget for each task may be modified
as actual costs are known. The total obligation of the Commission shall not exceed
$500,000.
CoopAgmtCity-RF
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-14
c pG
Resc(. Ma. 20'0z_'1
Council:
Miscellaneous
to:
to:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING -A PRE -DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WITH MERCY HOUSING OF CALIFORNIA FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND
AUTHORIZING THE. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, one of the primary goals and missions of the Community Development
Commission is to develop and maintain affordable housing within the Redevelopment Project
Area.
WHEREAS, the Southwest Blvd. Shopping Center is within the boundaries of the
Redevelopment Project Area and has been identified as potential affordable housing sites in the
City of Rohnert Park's Housing Element;
WHEREAS, Commission staff began meeting with Burbank Housing Development
Corporation in Summer 2002 and met with Mercy Housing of California at the Southwest
Shopping Center on December 3, 2002 to discuss affordable housing and redevelopment options;
WHEREAS, at the July 23, 2002 Commission budget study session, staff presented a
$500,000 budget to provide assistance to an affordable housing project at the Southwest Blvd.
Shopping Center;
WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled August 13, 2002 meeting, the Commission
appropriated $500,000 toward this project into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund;
WHEREAS, attached as Exhibit A to this resolution is the Pre -Development
Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Community Development Commission
the City of Rohnert Park that the Executive Director is authorized to execute a Pre -Development
Agreement with Mercy Housing of California.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19a' day of December 2002.
ATTEST:
Deputy Secretary
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Chairperson
PRE -DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the day of
20_, by and between the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK (the "Commission") and MERCY HOUSING OF
CALIFORNIA ("Mercy Housing").
Recitals
A. The Commission and Mercy Housing desire to enter into this Agreement
for the following purposes: Redevelop the Southwest Blvd. Shopping Center by
developing affordable housing and working with the property owners to enhance
retailers on site, the Shopping Center is specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 143-092-058 and 143-092-009. The property is more particularly described in
the map attached hereto as Exhibit A.
(1) To set forth activities, services and facilities that Mercy Housing will
render for and make available to the Commission in furtherance of the activities and
functions of the Commission under the Community Redevelopment Law; and
(2) To provide that the Commission will reimburse Mercy Housing for
actions undertaken and costs and expenses incurred by it for and on behalf of the
Commission. The source of the Commission's $500,000 commitment will come from
the Low and Moderate Income Housing fund as appropriated in the Commission's FY
02-03 budget.
PredevAgreement-MH
Agreements
1. Mercy Housing agrees to provide for the Commission such staff
assistance, supplies, technical services and other services and facilities of Mercy
Housing as the Commission may require in developing the affordable housing units.
Such assistance and services may include the services of officers, employees and
special consultants.
2. The Commission may advance necessary funds to the Commission or
expend funds on behalf of the Commission for the pre -development of the affordable
housing project located on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 143-092-058 and 143-092-009.
The pre -development tasks include, but not limited to, site environmental studies, site
engineering reports, architectural plans, engineering plans and specifications,
environmental mitigation, and public infrastructure improvements. The Commission's
obligation for these improvements and tasks shall not exceed $500,000 without
approval of the Commission. Burbank must receive authorization from the prior to
initiating any of the work described above. In addition, the scope and direction of work
performed by Mercy Housing on behalf of the Commission shall require prior approval
of the Commission. All work performed on behalf of the Commission shall be the
property of the Commission.
3. Mercy Housing will keep records of activities and services undertaken
pursuant to this Agreement and the costs thereof so that an accurate determination of
the Commission's liability to Mercy Housing can be made. Mercy Housing shall
periodically, but not less than annually, submit to the Commission a statement of the
costs incurred by Mercy Housing in rendering activities and services of Mercy Housing
to the Commission pursuant to this Agreement. Such statement of costs may include a
proration of Mercy Housing's administrative and salary expense attributable to services
of Mercy Housing's officials, employees and departments rendered for the Commission.
PredevAgreement-MH
4. The Commission agrees to reimburse Mercy Housing for all costs incurred
for services by Mercy Housing pursuant to this Agreement from and to the extent that
funds are available to the Commission for such purpose pursuant to Section 33670 of
the Community Redevelopment Law or from other sources provided.
5. INDEMNIFICATION. To the full extent permitted by law, Mercy Housing
shall indemnify, hold harmless, release and defend the Commission, its officers,
employees and agents from and against any and all actions, claims, demands, damages,
disability, losses, expenses including attorney's fees and other defense costs and liabilities
of any nature that may be asserted by any person or entity including Mercy Housing, in
whole or in part, arising out of Mercy Housing's activities hereunder, including the activities
of other persons employed or utilized by Mercy Housing in the performance of this
Agreement (including design defects and regardless of Commission's approval, use or
acceptance of the work or work product hereunder) excepting liabilities due to the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of Commission. This indemnification obligation is not
limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation
payable by or for Mercy Housing under Worker's Compensation, disability or other
employee benefit acts or the terms, applicability or limitations of any insurance held or
provided by Mercy Housing and shall continue to bind the parties after
termination/completion of this Agreement.
6. INSURANCE. Without limiting Mercy Housing's indemnification provided
herein, Mercy Housing shall take out and maintain, throughout the period of this
Agreement, the following policies of insurance placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Bests rating of no less than A:VII or its equivalent against injury/death to persons or
damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the activities hereunder of
Mercy Housing, its agents, employees or subcontractors. The cost of maintaining this
coverage shall be deemed a reimburseable expense in performance of the agreement.
A. Comprehensive or Commercial General Liability Insurance at least as
broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence
PredevAgreement-MH 3
41
fon-n CG 0001), in an amount of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence. If work involves explosive,
underground or collapse risks, XCU must be included. If a general aggregate limit is used,
either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project or the general
aggregate shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Said policy shall contain, or be
endorsed with, the following provisions:
(1) The Commission, its officers, employees and agents, are covered as
insureds for liability arising out of the operations performed by or on behalf of Mercy
Housing. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the Commission, its officers, agents and employees.
(2) The policy shall not be canceled or materially reduced in coverage
without thirty (30) days prior written notice (10 days for non-payment of premium) to
Commission by certified mail.
(3) The inclusion of more than one insured shall not operate to impair the
rights of one insured against another insured, and the coverage afforded shall apply as
though separate policies had been issued to each insured, but the inclusion of more than
one insured shall not operate to increase the limits of the insurer's liability.
(4) For claims related to this project, the Mercy Housing's insurance is
primary coverage to the Commission, and any insurance or self-insurance programs
maintained by the Commission is excess to Mercy Housing's insurance and will not be
called upon to contribute with it.
(5) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the parties,
including breach of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the Commission, its
officers, employees and agents.
B. Automobile liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as ISO
Form numbers CA 0001 06 92, Code 1 (any auto), for vehicles used in the performance of
PredevAgreement-MH 4
this Agreement with minimum coverage of not less than $1,000,000 per accident
combined single limit (CSL). Such policy shall contain or be endorsed with the provision
that coverage shall not be canceled or materially reduced in coverage without thirty (30)
days prior written notice (10 days for non-payment of premium) to the Commission by
certified mail.
C. Worker's Compensation insurance meeting statutory limits of Labor
Code which policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain a waiver of subrogation against
the Commission, its officers, agents, and employees and provide for thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the Commission in the event of cancellation. If Mercy Housing has no
employees, Mercy Housing may sign and fiie'the following certification in lieu of insurance:
'l am aware of the provisions of Califomia Labor Code Section
3700 which requires every employer to be insured against
liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and 1
will comply with the provisions of that code before
commencing with and during the performance of the work of
this contract. "
D. Professional liability insurance/errors and omission coverage in an
amount no less than $1,000,000.00 combined single limit (CSL). If insurance is written on
a claim -made basis, Mercy Housing agrees to maintain such insurance in effect for at least
three (3) years following completion of performance under this Agreement.
E. Mercy Housing shall fumish the Commission with certificates and original
endorsements effecting the required coverage prior to execution of this Agreement by the
Commission. The endorsements shall be on forms provided by the Commission or as
approved by the City Attorney. Any deductible or self-insured retention over $100,000.00
shall be disclosed to and approved by the Commission. If Mercy Housing does not keep
PredevAgreement-MH 5
I
all required insurance policies in full force and effect, the Commission may, in addition to
other remedies under this Agreement, take out the necessary insurance.
7. Termination or modification of Agreement by the Commission. The
Commission may terminate or modification this agreement at anytime without cause by
written notice to Mercy Housing. Termination or modification shall become effective ten
(10) days after the date of the letter.
8. Termination or modification of Agreement by Mercy Housing. Mercy
Housing may terminate or modification this agreement at anytime without cause by
written notice to the Commission. Termination or modification shall become effective
ten (10) days after the date of the letter.
PredevAgreement-MH 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Secretary
PredevAgreement-MH
MERCY HOUSING OF CALIFORNIA
in
Executive Director
"MERCY HOUSING"
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
M
Chairperson
"COMMISSION"
COUNTY ASSESSOR IS FAReEL !NAS' TAX CGDE ARVF 14345
�-ooz
7-oos
1
/0 &L'OC'K 2 i%a�7ir
.. I
7F1. 20-- __ 1
fg•,69 _____.-___._-_
---- BLbID —.06-, +--se!°u (,1
,
575.20
ico- 'b 98.10„ I25' laxl 39 /BIM �.
J •�3 �q ib 5e
h
Al III Svi Nf7 Cab IPaKb I. •bi A. .7 1{�1� 7j� � '�• 110110
N I 329'Siw A r�y['�`A "SEr •' �L /4.5. .
SBI^MIO t A L �ti Ne9e •J)'2 O �. `�� ';� _ D �•
1I l/�,��) 50 M \
JPL IB / �l � • �' .� � 8 � $� U I.27Ac. U y 97aP a '
cut 00 3.2?7Ac '� n Aevl�a d_
O ar n
RIS /55-4/ 8Y'•E-:OI. N: DRIVE
8 -3.
f
y 7��OLLL�G-E* .9VIEW NB9aSJ'rDRIVE R,p039� c I
~t:
9.0 e7s0�e
@77 �^ In ao,
�..lo
29.1a p ,43 •4�� o Y'�tt� K'4[30 �
_'-,.Y�� aP ._ '`,ia p raj •� \� /9
�� �g;�� m .s• ° 4 ecocx l
• `i 'p ta'atl � m
" 5 - _041
a -B
oe .au+ar2
l� ,u B. L
\ cn
NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARP F6R
ASSESSMENT PURPOSES'ONLY, Nr
LIABILITY IS ASSI.►YEM) FQR TTM
HE
U T DATA DELINEATED
tiE=Ei�`I .
Assessor Is
Sgnom a CgLa 1 y, co/if
I
ti
CDC. ResoL At. 26oz qS
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY- DEVELOPMENT
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING A PRE -DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WITH BURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, one of the primary goals and missions of the Community Development
Commission is to develop and maintain affordable housing within the Redevelopment Project
Area.
WHEREAS, the City Hall Site (6750 Commerce Blvd.), the Southwest Station Site (435
Southwest Blvd.), and the vacant lot west of Food 4 Less (705 Rohn6rt Park Expressway) are
within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Project Area and have been identified as potential
affordable housing sites in the City of Rohnert Park's Housing Element;
WHEREAS, Commission staff began meeting with Burbank Housing Development
Corporation in early 2002 and on July 14, 2002, Burbank Housing Development Corporation
provided Commission staff with a letter formally expressing their desire to pursue further
affordable housing projects at the City Hall Site (6750 Commerce Blvd.), the Southwest Station
Site (435 Southwest Blvd.), and the vacant lot west of Food 4 Less (705 Rohnert Park
Expressway);
WHEREAS, at the July 23, 2002 Commission budget study session, staff presented a
$400,000 budget to provide assistance to an affordable housing project in the City Centre area;
WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled August 13, 2002 meeting, the Commission
appropriated $400,000 toward this project into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund;
WHEREAS, due to the lack of progress on the City Centre Housing project, staff
recommends allocating the $400,000 appropriated for the City Centre project to the three sites
listed above in a Pre -Development Agreement with Burbank Housing Development Corporation;
WHEREAS, at the August 13, 2002 meeting, the Executive Director of Burbank Housing
Development Corporation provided a presentation to the Commission regarding affordable
housing development options;
WHEREAS, attached as Exhibit A to this resolution is the Pre -Development Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Community Development Commission
of the City of Rohnert Park that the Executive Director is authorized to execute a Pre -
Development Agreement with Burbank Housing Development Corporation.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19t' day of December 2002.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Chairperson
ATTEST:
Deputy Secretary
PRE -DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the day of
20, by and between the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK (the "Commission") and BURBANK HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ("Burbank Housing").
Recitals
A. The Commission and Burbank Housing desire to enter into this Agreement
for the following purposes:- Develop affordable housing units on three sites: the
City Hall Site (6750 Commerce Blvd.), the Southwest Station Site (435 Southwest
Blvd.), and city -owned vacant lot west of Food 4 Less (705 Rohnert Park Expressway
West)
(1) To set forth activities, services and facilities that Burbank Housing
will render for and make available to the Commission in furtherance of the activities and
functions of the Commission under the Community Redevelopment Law; and
(2) To provide that the Commission will reimburse Burbank Housing for
actions undertaken and costs and expenses incurred by it for and on behalf of the
Commission. The source of the Commission's $400,000 commitment will come from
the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund as appropriated in the Commission's FY
02-03 budget.
Agreements
1. Burbank Housing agrees to provide for the Commission such staff
assistance, supplies, technical services and other services and facilities of Burbank
Housing as the Commission may require in developing the affordable housing units.
PredevAgreement-BH2 1
Such assistance and services may include the services of officers, employees and
special consultants.
2. The Commission may advance necessary funds to the Commission or
expend funds on behalf of the Commission for the pre -development of the affordable
housing project located on three sites: the City Hall Site (6750 Commerce Blvd.), the
Southwest Station Site (435 Southwest Blvd.), and city -owned vacant lot west of Food 4
Less (705 Rohnert Park Expressway West). The pre -development tasks include, but
not limited to, site environmental studies, site engineering reports, architectural plans,
engineering plans and specifications, environmental mitigation and public infrastructure
improvements. The Commissions obligation for these improvements shall not exceed
$400,000 without approval of the Commission. Burbank must receive authorization
from the prior to initiating any of the work described above. In addition, the scope and
direction of work performed by Burbank Housing on behalf of the Commission shall
require prior approval of the Commission. All work performed on behalf of the
Commission shall be the property of the Commission.
3. Burbank Housing will keep records of activities and services undertaken
pursuant to this Agreement and the costs thereof so that an accurate determination of
the Commission's liability to Burbank Housing can be made. Burbank Housing shall
periodically, but not less than annually, submit to the Commission a statement of the
costs incurred by Burbank Housing in rendering activities and services of Burbank
Housing to the Commission pursuant to this Agreement. Such statement of costs may
include a proration of Burbank Housing's administrative and salary expense attributable
to services of Burbank Housing's officials, employees and departments rendered for the
Commission.
4. The Commission agrees to reimburse Burbank Housing for all costs
incurred for services by Burbank Housing pursuant to this Agreement from and to the
extent that funds are available to the Commission for such purpose pursuant to Section
33670 of the Community Redevelopment Law or from other sources provided.
PredevAgreement-BH2
u
5. INDEMNIFICATION. To the full extent permitted by law, Burbank Housing
shall indemnify, hold harmless, release and defend the Commission, its officers,
employees and agents from and against any and all actions, claims, demands, damages,
disability, losses, expenses including attorney's fees and other defense costs and liabilities
of any nature that may be asserted by any person or entity including Burbank Housing, in
whole or in part, arising out of Burbank Housing's activities hereunder, including the
activities of other persons employed or utilized by Burbank Housing in the performance of
this Agreement (including design defects and regardless of Commission's approval, use or
acceptance of the work or work product hereunder) excepting liabilities due to the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of Commission. This indemnification obligation is not
limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation
payable by or for Burbank Housing under Worker's Compensation, disability or other
employee benefit acts or the terms, applicability or limitations of any insurance held or
provided by Burbank Housing and shall continue to bind the parties after
termination/completion of this Agreement.
6. INSURANCE. Without limiting Burbank Housing's indemnification provided
herein, Burbank Housing shall take out and maintain, throughout the period of this
Agreement, the following policies of insurance placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Bests rating of no less than A:VII or its equivalent against injury/death to persons or
damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the activities hereunder of
Burbank Housing, its agents, employees or subcontractors. The cost of maintaining this
coverage shall be deemed a reimburseable expense in performance of the agreement.
A. Comprehensive or Commercial General Liability Insurance at least as
broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence
form CG 0001), in an amount of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence. If work involves explosive,
underground or collapse risks, XCU must be included. If a general aggregate limit is used,
either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project or the general
PredevAgreement-13H2 3
aggregate shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Said policy shall contain, or be
endorsed with, the following provisions:
(1) The Commission, its officers, employees and agents, are covered as
insureds for liability arising out of the operations performed by or on behalf of Burbank
Housing. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the Commission, its officers, agents and employees.
(2) The policy shall not be canceled or materially reduced in coverage
without thirty (30) days prior written notice (10 days for non-payment of premium) to
Commission by certified mail.
(3) The inclusion of more than one insured shall not operate to impair the
rights of one insured against another insured, and the coverage afforded shall apply as
though separate policies had been issued to each insured, but the inclusion of more than
one insured shall not operate to increase the limits of the insurer's liability.
(4) For claims related to this project, the Burbank Housing's insurance is
primary coverage to the Commission, and any insurance or self-insurance programs
maintained by the Commission is excess to Burbank Housing's insurance and will not be
called upon to contribute with it.
(5) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the parties,
including breach of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the Commission, its
officers, employees and agents.
B. Automobile liability 'insurance with coverage at least as broad as ISO
Form numbers CA 0001 06 92, Code 1 (any auto), for vehicles used in the performance of
this Agreement with minimum coverage of not less than $1,000,000 per accident
combined single limit (CSL). Such policy shall contain or be endorsed with the provision
that coverage shall not be canceled or materially reduced in coverage without thirty (30)
PredevAgreement-BH2 4
I
days prior written notice (10 days for non-payment of premium) to the Commission by
certified mail.
C. Worker's Compensation insurance meeting statutory limits of Labor
Code which policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain a waiver of subrogation against
the Commission, its officers, agents, and employees and provide for thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the Commission in the event of cancellation. If Burbank Housing has no
employees, Burbank Housing may sign and file the following certification in lieu of
insurance:
'I am aware of the provisions of California Labor Code Section
3700 which requires every employer to be insured against
liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I
will comply with the provisions of that code before
commencing with and during the performance of the work of
this contract "
D. Professional liability insurance/errors and omission coverage in an
amount no less than $1,000,000.00 combined single limit (CSL). If insurance is written on
a claim -made basis, Burbank Housing agrees to maintain such insurance in effect for at
least three (3) years following completion of performance under this Agreement.
E. Burbank Housing shall furnish the Commission with certificates and
original endorsements effecting the required coverage prior to execution of this Agreement
by the Commission. The endorsements shall be on forms provided by the Commission or
as approved by the City Attorney. Any deductible or self-insured retention over
$100,000.00 shall be disclosed to and approved by the Commission. If Burbank Housing
does not keep all required insurance policies in full force and effect, the Commission may,
in addition to other remedies under this Agreement, take out the necessary insurance.
PredevAgreement-BH2 5
7. Termination or modification of Agreement by the Commission. The
Commission may terminate or modify this agreement at anytime without cause by
written notice to Burbank Housing. Termination or modification shall become effective
ten (10) days after the date of the letter.
8. Termination or modification of Agreement by Burbank Housing. Burbank
Housing may terminate this agreement at anytime without cause by written notice to the
Commission. Termination or modification shall become effective ten (10) days after the
date of the letter.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Secretary
BURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
as
Executive Director
"BURBANK HOUSING"
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Chairperson
"COMMISSION"
PredevAgreement-BH2 6
CDC ResaL, t4o - 26o 2 -16
council: X
I Miscellaneous
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-16 Copy to:
Cony to:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING THE COMMITMENT OF
$450,000 IN LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUNDS TO
THE WELLNESS CENTER HEALTH CARE CAMPUS (KISCO)
WHEREAS, one of the primary goals and missions of the Community Development Commission
is to develop and maintain affordable housing within the Redevelopment Project Area.
WHEREAS, the proposed Wellness Center Campus project is located in the Redevelopment
Project Area;
WHEREAS, the developer of this campus is Kisco Retirement Communities (KRC);
WHEREAS, the Wellness Center Campus project proposes to build approximately 200 units
available to senior citizens and create an environment for senior citizens where health care and
nutrition resources are provided for on the campus;
WHEREAS, KRC has committed to provide 20% of its units to low and very -low income seniors;
WHEREAS, KRC is contractually obligated to provide 20% of units to low and very low income
seniors by the lease executed by Kisco and the City of Rohnert Park in December 2001.
WHEREAS, $450,000 in Community Development Commission funding has been appropriated
from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund in fiscal year 02-03 to provide affordable
housing to seniors -at the Wellness Center Development;
WHEREAS, $170,000 of Community Development Commission funding has already been
dispersed to KRC;
WHEREAS, these improvements will substantially improve the. availability of affordable housing
for senior citizens within the Redevelopment Project Area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rohnert Park affirms its
commitment and contractual obligation to Kisco Retirement Communities to provide $450,000 in
assistance to fund affordable housing units at the Wellness Center Campus Development and the
Executive Director is authorized to execute agreements and disperse payments to meet this
obligation.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 19`x' day of December 2002.
ATTEST:
Deputy Secretary
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Chairperson
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
6750 Commerce Boulevard
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: IZI(t f0a
TO: PHONE.
FAX:
.�M Ke►v� e.d� , 7 re5s f�Gfa� �
FROM. -C' o �\ PHONE:
FAX.
RE:
�� flea. "'03 pt"Ca
Number of pages including cover sheet: 3
Message
FAX 691- aA 33
— '-AX .' '591-5P-31
588-2227
588-2274
City of Rohnert Park* 6750 Commerce Boulevard+Rohnert Park, California 94928
Phone: (707)588-2227* FAX: (707)588-2274 *WEB: mww.rpcity.org
ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING for GOAL SETTING
AGENDA
December 19, 2002
5:00 p.m.
Special Session - Open
Call to Order
Roll Call (Flores_ Mackenzie Nordin Spradlin _ Vidak-Martinez_)
Unscheduled public appearances:
For public comment on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time (limited to
3-5 minutes per person, or allocation of time based on number of speaker cards submitted,
not to exceed a 30 minute total time limit) - Public comments for Special Meetings are
restricted to items listed on the agenda. [G.C.54954.3(a)]
5:05 p.m.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the consent calendar will be considered in toto by one action of
the Council unless any Councilmember or anyone else interested in any matter
on the consent calendar has a question about same.
A. Acknowledging the City Manager/Clerk's report on the posting
of the meeting's agenda
B. Approval of Bills/Demands for Payment concurrently for:
• City of Rohnert Park/City Council
• Community Development Commission
C. Accepting Cash/Investments Report for Month End,
October 31, 2002 concurrently for:
• City of Rohnert Park/City Council
• Community Development Commission
• Rohnert Park Financing Authority
D. City Resolutions for Adoption:
2002-272 Endorsing the Rohnert Park Boys and Girls Club Sonoma County
Community Development Block Grant Application
2002-273 Endorsing the Committee on the Shelterless (COTS) Sonoma
County Community Development Block Grant Application
2002-274 Endorsing the Rebuilding Together Rohnert Park Sonoma County
Community Development Block Grant Application
2002-275 Authorizing and Approving an Agreement with Ms. Toni Bertolero
of Winzler & Kelly, Consulting Engineers, for the Appointment as
Interim City Engineer
2002-276 Authorizing City Manager/City Attorney to Draft Appropriate
Documents to Memorialize Option No. 1 as Outlined in Sonoma
County Wineries Association Letter of December 6, 2002
City of.Robnert Pari: CONCURRENT MEETINGS Aizenda (2) - SPECIAL MEETING - December Y9, 2002
for City CounciUCommunity Development CommissionlRohnert. Park Financing Authority/Rohnert Park District
D. City Resolutions for Adoption: (con't)
2002-277 Approval of a Purchase Agreement between the City of Rohnert Park and
the Community Development Commission to Purchase 450 City Hall Drive
2002-278 Approval of an Agreement between the Community Development
Commission and the City of Rohnert Park to Provide Improvements to
Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park to Preserve the Stock of Affordable
Housing Within the Redevelopment Project Area
E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION matters:
CDC Resolutions for Adoption:
2002-11 Approval of a Purchase Agreement between the City of Rohnert Park and
the Community Development Commission to Purchase 450 City Hall Drive
2002-12 Approval of Development Agreement and Security Agreement between the
Community Development Commission and Burbank Housing for the
Purpose of Developing Affordable Housing at 450 City Hall Drive
2002-13 Approval of an Agreement between the Community Development
Commission and the City of Rohnert Park to Provide Improvements to
Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park to Preserve the Stock of Affordable
Housing Within the Redevelopment Project Area
2002-14 Approval of Pre -Development Agreement between Mercy Housing of
California to Develop Affordable Housing at the Southwest Shopping
Center in Compliance with the City's General Plan and Housing Element
2002-15 Approval of a Pre -Development Agreement with Burbank Housing for a
Scattered Site Housing Development within the Redevelopment Project Area
2002-16 Approval of an Affordable Housing Development Agreement with Kisco for
the Wellness Center Site
5:10 p.m.
2. GOAL SETTING - Council consideration of goal setting objectives as follows:
Council Goals for 2003
Question: What do we want to accomplish?
CLOSED SESSION - COUNCIL WILL MEET IN CLOSED SESSION
AFTER THE SPECIAL MEETING TO CONSIDER:
• Personnel matters (G.C. 54957)
- Evaluation of performance of City Attorney and City Manager
ADJOURNMENT no later than 8:00 p.m.
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other
person to assist you while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City Offices at
(707) 588-2227 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation by
the City. Please make sure the City Manager's office is notified as soon as possible if you have a visual
impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another format (Braille, audio -tape, etc.)
JI1-h:agenda\121902 AGENDA -SPECIAL MEETING for GOAL SETTING
Dec. 16 2002 12:10PM
YOUR LOGO :City of Roknert Park
YOUR FAX NO. :707-588-2274
NO.
OTHER FACSIMILE
START TIME
USAGE
TIME MODE
PAGES
RESULT
01
919134320824
Dec.13
12:06PM
01'17
SND
02
OK
02
97924516
Dec.13
12:44PM
00'56
SND
02
OK
03
97924516
Dec.13
12:47PM
00'56
SND
02
OK
04
4158832096
Dec.13
01:58PM
01'13
RCV
02
OK
05
<FAX # NOT AVAIL.>
Dec.13
02:30PM
00'30
RCV
01
OK
06
97734204
Dec.13
02:36PM
00'49
SND
01
OK
07
95856705
Dec.13
02:38PM
01'46
SND
01
OK
08
Finance
Dec.13
04:19PM
01'12
SND
01
OK
09
Finance
Dec.13
05:45PM
01'32
SND
01
OK
10
Via Fax
Dec.16
06:14AM
01'56
RCV
02
OK
11
<FAX # NOT AVAIL.>
Dec.16
08:13AM
00'59
RCV
01
OK
12
99442223
Dec.16
08:59AM
00'42
SND
00
OTHER FAX
NOT RESPOND
13
92248833
Dec.16
09:01AM
01'49
SND
04
OK
14
99442223
Dec.16
09:06AM
00'42
SND
00
OTHER FAX
NOT RESPOND
15
99442223
Dec.16
09:07AM
00'42
SND
00
OTHER FAX
NOT RESPOND
16
99442223
Dec.16
09:09AM
00'42
SND
00
OTHER FAX
NOT RESPOND
17
99442223
Dec.16
09:12AM
00'20
SND
00
PRESSED THE STOP KEY
18
VidakMarti
Dec.16
10:18AM
01'39
SND
02
OK
19
FloresArma
Dec.16
10:20AM
01'07
SND
02
OK
20
MackenzieJ
Dec.16
10:22AM
01'07
SND
02
OK
21
917475359745
Dec.16
11:28AM
00'42
SND
00
OTHER FAX
NOT RESPOND
22
917475359745
Dec.16
11:30AM
00'42
SND
00
OTHER FAX
NOT RESPOND
23
917475359745
Dec.16
11:31AM
00'13
SND
00
PRESSED THE STOP KEY
24
917275359745
Dec.16
11:32AM
01'11
SND
02
OK
25
2_'95842233—~
6-`-`-
95811874 _
, —
Dec,. -16-1.1:
DL c ' 6i11
36AM
57RM
00'
32_
10
SND _01
-SND03�_
OK
OK r
27
95215239
Dec.16
11:59AM
_0l'
00'42
SND--
00
_
OTHER FAX
NOT RESPOND
28
95215239
Dec.i6
12:01PM
00142
SND
00
OTHER FAX
NOT RESPOND
29
952152:59 -______Dec.
12:02PM
00'42
SND
00
OTHER FAX
NOT RESPOND
30239-
-15
--03---
OK. _
� . • • � • • C •tib • M .•r^ 11• :+i i � • � �..
The CaiverGuide Series on _ f/ective Board
Governance provides succinct explana-
tions of key aspects of the Policy Governance
model of board leadership. Policy Governance,
an empowering and fundamental redesign of
the board role, emphasizes values, vision,
empowerment of both board and staff, and the
strategic ability to lead leaders. Under Policy Governance, a board crafts its
values into policies of four types: ends, executive limitations, board -executive
linkage, and governance process. Except for what belongs in bylaws or
enabling statutes, these categories of board policy contain everything the
board has to say about values and perspectives that underlie all organiza-
tional decisions, activities, practices, budgets, and goals. Because values per-
meate and dominate all organizational life, redesigning policy in this way
presents the most powerful lever for expressing board leadership.
ENDS: The board defines which human needs are to be met, for whom, and
at what cost. Written with a long-term perspective, these mission -related
policies embody the board's long-range vision.
EXECUTIVE LIMITATIONS: The board establishes the boundaries of accept-
ability within which staff methods and activities can responsibly be left to
staff. These limiting policies apply to stall means rather than ends.
BOARD -STAFF LINKAGE: The board clarifies the manner in which it dele-
gates authority to staff as well as how it evaluates staff performance on pro-
visions of the ends and executive limitations policies.
GOVERNANCE PROCESS: The board determines its philosophy, its account-
ability, and specifics of its own job. The effective design of its own board
processes ensures that the board will fulfill its three primary responsibilities:
maintaining links to the ownership, establishing the four categories of writ-
ten policies, and assuring executive performance.
' Policy Governtmce , is a service mark of Jahn Calver
IlllffCARVERGUIDE
BASIC
PRINCIPLES
OF POLICY
GOVERNANCE
John Carver and
Miriam Mayhew Carver
•'D JOSSEY-BASS
A Wiley Company
www.josseybass.cor
,
FINAL DRAFT: 5/9/01
City of Rohnert Park
Council and Staff
O.UR MISSION
Serving our community together.
OUR VALUES
Serve in a respectful, jPso�ve and welcoming manner. I
Create a positive and tgafthy environment.
Dedicate ourselves to high standards of service.
Take actions that are in the best interests of the community.
OUR VISION
1. Organizational Excellence
Pride in our creativity, innovation, accessibility and responsiveness to the
needs of the people we serve.
2. A Model of High Quality City Services
Our community has a continuum of excellent services and a solid
infrastructure that sets a standard for others.
3. Financial Health
We promote economic vitality and responsible use of resources resulting in a
fiscally sound city government.
4. Community, Economic'and Environmental Sustainability and Stewardship
We are committed to utilizing our resources"to build an economically, socially,
and environmentally healthy community in away that meets the needs of the
people who live here today and in the future.
5. Taking Our Place As a Major Partner in the Health of a Dynamic Region
We create partnerships and alliances that result in collaborations of mutual
benefit between the city and other public, private and non-profit entities in
support of a healthier, better integrated region.
6. Wonderful Quality of Life. For All
We are the cultural and educational center of Sonoma County; a
well-planned, safe, family-oriented clean, beautiful community; a great place
to live and work for people of all ages and incomes.
W01. . . . . . . . . .
cc
lZ& k'*
k;
. '71
NA WIV
yJl /A
C lit
0 '01 IN
MAW)
•
MISSISTA TEMENT
ON
Niggig
t
0 F THE CITY COUNCIL
0t:
OF
AD
TVE CITY OFROHNERT PARK
_�_Lo
cc
lZ& k'*
k;
. '71
NA WIV
yJl /A
C lit
0 '01 IN
MAW)
V
A
R
1.4 OBJECTIVES AND THEMES
GENERAL PLAN OBJECTIVES
Several objectives for the General Plan were identified and considered by the Oversight
Committee, based on public outreach conducted early in the General Plan process. The
foundation for development of the goals and policies in the General
objectives provide s
Plan, and include:
,
• Establish a 20 -year Urban Growth Boundary;
• Keep the city's small-town feel;
,
• Provide for slow, managed, and predictable growth;
• Increase housing affordability and diversity;
• Establish better cross-town connections;
• Maintain or increase open space ratios within the City;
'
• Encourage local jobs and maintain the jobs/housing balance;
• Build and maintain infrastructure in anticipation of growth;
• Integrate land use planning with SSU expansion plans and establish better
'
connections with the University;
• Uphold or improve current levels of city services;
'
• Encourage socioeconomic diversity;
• Ensure legal adequacy and address external jurisdictional issues, including
'
coordination with the Sonoma County Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO), Sonoma County, and Rohnert Park's neighbors;
• Increase pedestrian and bike access;
1
• Provide a framework for design standards that reflect these objectives; and
• Create options for the city's edges. Allow for soft boundaries and scenic corridors.
'
THEMES '
Building on these overall objectives, the General Plan is structured around several themes,
which form the basis of goals and policies throughout the document.
1. An Urban Growth Boundary and Growth Management Program. The General Plan '
establishes a 20 -year growth boundary, "trigger" caps on development, and adequate
public facility requirements. These policies and programs will ensure phased and
orderly development, and a sustained high quality of life.
1-6 1
Chapter 1: Introduction and Overview
2. A "Greenbelt" around the city, with targeted growth areas. Growth is targeted in
selected areas to the east and northwest to reinforce a contiguous and compact urban
form. Land surrounding the city, where Rohnert Park's boundaries do not coincide
with Cotati's, are maintained in open space. An open space buffer is also maintained
between new growth areas and Petaluma Hill Road. The buffer varies in width and
includes both open land and recreational facilities.
3. City/University Integration, and Mixed -Use Centers. The General Plan designates a
new pedestrian -oriented University District—envisioned with a mix of residential,
retail, entertainment, and office uses that cater to students, faculty, and staff, as well
as residents—along Rohnert Park Expressway north of the campus. In addition, the
City Center, adjacent to the Expressway and Commerce Boulevard, is designated for
a mix of public, office, residential, and retail uses. In addition to these two new
centers, the Wilfred-Dowdell Village is already being planned as of 1999 and
provides a variety of shops and commercial uses, in a pedestrian -oriented enclave on
the westside.
4. Balanced Neighborhoods. A guiding premise of the Plan is that activities and
facilities used on a frequent basis, such as stores and parks, should be easily
accessible to residents. Land uses are designated to ensure balanced neighborhood
development with a mix of uses and housing types, provision of parks and schools,
and easy access to mixed-use and commercial activity centers.
5. Increased Connectivity and Accessibility. The city's existing neighborhoods have few
interconnecting streets, and US 101 limits east -west access. Improved connections
between neighborhoods, as well as new connections across the highway are included
in the General Plan. Roadway improvements and new streets are also proposed to
link different neighborhoods and to connect residential areas with SSU.
6. A Network of Open Space. Using creeks as the armature, an interconnected network
of open space, parks, and trails is provided. These will also enable connections from
existing neighborhoods to open space areas beyond Petaluma Hill Road and the SSU
campus.
Pedestrian- and Bicycle -Friendly Environments. Policies for land uses, mixes,
intensities, and urban design are established to encourage walking and bicycling. In
activity centers like the University District, policies are also established to promote
small block sizes and frequent local streets, which help maximize the permeability of
a neighborhood for people walking or bicycling.
8. Enhanced Community Character. The General Plan establishes specific urban design
policies at a citywide, neighborhood, and street scale. Connections between
neighborhoods, transitions between urban and open space areas, city and
neighborhood edges, community orientation of development, building massing, and
streetscapes are all addressed. Policies are also included for viewshed protection.
1-7
Goal 1
Goal 2
Goal 3
Goal 4
Goal 5
Goal 6
City Of Rohnert Park
Armando F. Flores Councilman
December 19, 2002
GOALS FOR 2003-04
To Reduce Expenditures To Closely Reflect Revenue
A @ /."//.? /" :?
To Use Designated Fund Accounts, Only If Absolutely Necessary, To Support
The General Fund
To Reduce Personnel, Through Retirement And Resignation, And Maintain A
Level Of Satisfactory Service
To Reduce Existing City Programs And Services And Maintain Acceptable
Levels
To Focus On Economic Development Projects And Programs
To Emphasize Priority Efforts From Every Department In The Support And
Consideration Of Projects And Programs That Promote Economic Development
Jan. 07 2003 11:33AM
YOUR LOGO :City of Rohnert Park
YOUR FAX NO. :707-588-2274
NO.
OTHER FACSIMILE
START TIME
USAGE TIME
MODE
PAGES
RESULT
01
95215436
Jan.03
03:47PM
05'38
SMD
11
OK
02
95421077
Jan.03
05:58PM
00'37
SND
01
OK
03
Via Fax
Jan.06
06:27RM
01'54
RCV
02
OK
04
Finance
Jan.06
03:37AM
01'39
SND
02
OK
05
95426127
Jan.06
10:07AM
01'18
SND
02
OK
06
95426127
Jan.06
10:09AM
01'08
SND
02
OK
07
95842338
Jan.06
10:10AM
01'18
SND
04
OK
08
95841511
Jan.06
10:12AM
00'42
SND
00
NO DOCUMENT
09
97951198
Jan.06
10:14AM
01147
SND
.04
OK
10
95841511
Jan.06
10:27AM
00134
SND.
00
PRESSED THE STOP KEY
11
914152574411
Jan.06
10:28AM
01124
SND
04
OK
12
99380374
Jan.06
10:35AM
00'44
SND
01
OK
13
Via Fax
Jan.06
11:21AM
00150
RCV
01
OK
14
REMIF
Jan.06
11:53AM
01'39
SND
04
OK
15
REMIF
Jan.06
12:24PM
04151
SND
13
OK
16
<FAX # NOT AVAIL.>
Jan.06
02:16PM
00147
RCV
00
OTHER FAX NOT RESPOND
17
925 933 4126
Jan.06
02:29PM
01'17
RCV
03
OK
18
925 933 4126
Jan.06
02:31PM
03139
RCV
11
OK
19
ABSFAX
Jan.06
02:49PM
00'58
RCV
01
OK
20
97620473
Jan.06
03:17PM
00142
SND
00
OTHER FAX NOT RESPOND
21
97620473
Jan.06
03:18PM
00142
SND
00
OTHER FAX NOT RESPOND
22
97620473
Jan.06
03:20PM
00143
SND
01
OK
23
912095217221
Jan.06
04:24PM
01116
SND
03
OK
24
96644350
Jan.07
09:00AM
00'59
SND
02
OK
25
707 938 0374
Jan.07
09:24AM
00'40
RCV
01
OK
26
95856705
Jan.07
09:37AM
01'14
SND
01
OK
27
7079442223
Jan.07
10:16AM
02142
RCV
05
OK
28
95653778
Jan.07
11:10AM
00146
SND
02
OK
29
707 894 3451
Jan.07
11:27AM
02117
RCV
09
OK
30
VidakMarti
Jan.07
11:32AM
01119
SND
02
OK
GOAL SETTING
COUNCIL WORK SESSION 12/19/02
NOTES —Page 1
SAX TO : �v rvt �
� n 1
S!J �
SATISFACTORY QUALITY OF LIFE
• Create and Sustain Financial StabilityJ
- - --- —
• Acceptable Level of Services and Programs (Customer Service)
• Maintain Existing and Establish New Partnerships (Mutually Beneficial)
• Maintain City Infrastructure and Enhance as Possible
[18 month Timeline].
NOTES - Page 2
CREATE AND SUSTAIN FINANCIAL STABILITY
• Economic Development Plan
• Streamline Service Delivery
• Reorganize City Departments
• Implement the General Plan
• Retain Existing Businesses
• Maximize Tourism Potential
• Work with LAFCO / Annexation
Armando F. Flores Goals for 2003-2004 [Attached to Page 2]
Goal 1: To Reduce Expenditures to Closely Reflect Revenue
Goal 2: To Use Designated Fund Accounts only if absolutely necessary to Support the
General Fund
Goal 3: To Reduce Personnel, through Retirement and Resignation, and Maintain a
Level of Satisfactory Service
Goal 4: To Reduce Existing City Programs and Services and Maintain Acceptable
Levels
Goal 5: To Focus on Economic Development Projects and Programs
Goal 6: To Emphasize Priority Efforts from Every Department in the Support and
Consideration of Projects and Programs that Promote Economic Development.
NOTES - Page 3
ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF SERVICES AND PROGRAMS
• Define "Acceptable" — Maximize Public Input
Response Times/ Public Safety
Acceptable Levels — Public Works
Parks
Streets
Storm Drains
Traffic
• Acceptable --+ Affordable
• Concept of Customer Service for City Staff
• Employee Morale
• Responsiveness
• Insights from Department Staff and Administration
NOTES - Page 4
PARTNERSHIPS — MAINTAIN EXISTING AND ESTABLISH NEW ONES
County, CRPUSD, SSU, the Jurisdictions, Santa Rosa, CBD's, Service Organizations,
Santa Rosa = Water/Sewer
• Affordable Housing
• Mobile Home Parks
• Green Center / Tourism
• Sponsorships —a Park / Area
• Volunteers
• Private Enterprise
• Youth Sports
• Change Paradigm to: How we Can Do rather than Why we Can't Do
NOTES - Page 5
MAINTAIN CITY INFRASTRUCTURE — ENHANCE AS POSSIBLE
• Capital Improvement Program
• Report Card — Departments given to Council Quarterly
• Regular Department Updates: Keep it Simple
• Establish a Base Fund for Priority Projects
• City Facilities kept Open as Possible
• Street Maintenance
• Examine Special Funds in Budgets
GOAL SETTING
COUNCIL WORK SESSION 12/19/02
NOTES — Page 1
SATISFACTORY QUALITY OF LIFE
• Create and Sustain Financial Stability
• Acceptable Level of Services and Programs (Customer Service)
• Maintain Existing and Establish New Partnerships (Mutually Beneficial)
• Maintain City Infrastructure and Enhance as Possible
[18 month Timeline].
NOTES - Page 2
CREATE AND SUSTAIN FINANCIAL STABILITY
• Economic Development Plan
• Streamline Service Delivery
• Reorganize City Departments
• Implement the General Plan
• Retain Existing Businesses
• Maximize Tourism Potential
• Work with LAFCO / Annexation
Armando F. Flores Goals for 2003-2004 [Attached to Page 2]
Goal 1: To Reduce Expenditures to Closely Reflect Revenue
Goal 2: To Use Designated Fund Accounts only if absolutely necessary to Support the
General Fund
Goal 3: To Reduce Personnel, through Retirement and Resignation, and Maintain a
Level of Satisfactory Service
Goal 4: To Reduce Existing City Programs and Services and Maintain Acceptable
Levels
Goal 5: To Focus on Economic Development Projects and Programs
Goal 6: To Emphasize Priority Efforts from Every Department in the Support and
Consideration of Projects and Programs that Promote Economic Development.
NOTES - Page 3
ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF SERVICES AND PROGRAMS
• Define "Acceptable" — Maximize Public Input
Response Times/ Public Safety
Acceptable Levels — Public Works
Parks
Streets
Storm Drains
Traffic
• Acceptable --+ Affordable
• Concept of Customer Service for City Staff
• Employee Morale
• Responsiveness
• Insights from Department Staff and Administration
NOTES - Page 4
PARTNERSHIPS — MAINTAIN EXISTING AND ESTABLISH NEW ONES
County, CRPUSD, SSU, the Jurisdictions, Santa Rosa, CBD's, Service Organizations,
Santa Rosa = Water/Sewer
• Affordable Housing
• Mobile Home Parks
• Green Center / Tourism
• Sponsorships —a Park / Area
• Volunteers
• Private Enterprise
• Youth Sports
• Change Paradigm to: How we Can Do rather than Why we Can't Do
NOTES - Page 5
MAINTAIN CITY INFRASTRUCTURE — ENHANCE AS POSSIBLE
• Capital Improvement Program
• Report Card — Departments given to Council Quarterly
• Regular Department Updates: Keep it Simple
• Establish a Base Fund for Priority Projects
• City Facilities kept Open as Possible
• Street Maintenance
• Examine Special Funds in Budgets
�` vt
Gt.,l V\,
c<
6�
G�
/A/IY Q
(loopt
�eS � -opt(000es
00
4
00
i�
P
��� �..
r��/oma
Ca� ��a,( � �,P. rovCer.�v�- �r� R
.�p �I�`C�cC — G�-fJ�'3 �vr%�G� � CA>(.cti.c..Q
�.�✓�
0000V
L)iL
OOPA
h
6
t
aotot
o �,
Co�,��i11� i�A.n��S W►�Ih ��tic0000e"l SI�GG�(�t!—
17t4 N
Af `
i
•it
L
IK f
S
i.
4
uu! �"�'
' ;. - t / � list ��
�b. �'� ,�
rji � iM
'� �� ,'�
r'
�� h_
� �
�,
�� � _
V •f/ - f e�
0 ?� , �f ,
,�
..- r
��
` ,,,