2004/07/13 City Council Agenda PacketEM
Bingham McCutchen LLP
Suite 210
1333 North California Blvd.
PO Box V
Walnut Creek, CA
94596-1270
925.937.8000
925.975.5390 fax
binghom.com
Boston
Hartford
London
Los Angeles
New York
San Francisco
Silicon Valley
Singapore
Walnut Creek
Washington
BINGHAM McCUTCHEN
Marie A. Cooper
Direct Phone: (925) 975-5367
Direct Fax: (925) 975-5390
marie.cooper@bingham.com
Our File No.: 2228690005
July 13, 2004
Via Email to City Clerk's Office ohauff@rpcity.org)
Hon. Members of the City Council
City of Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Boulevard
Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486
Re: PFFP Development Impact Fees – Agenda Item 9
Dear Councilmembers:
I am writing on behalf of the applicants for the University District Specific Plan.
In my letter of June 8, I listed some concerns we wanted to see addressed in the
next round of fee refinements. We have since been working with City staff and
have resolved our concerns through some clarifying edits to the proposed
resolution. Staff also has advised us that the language of the ordinance is
intended to be interpreted as set forth below, and that Council adoption of the
ordinance will be premised on these interpretations. We have no objections to
adoption of either the ordinance as interpreted below, or the resolution as revised
for adoption.
The interpretations are as follows:
Section 3.28.030.D exempts projects that have paid a PF Fee or its equivalent.
This language means that development projects that have received all
development permits, and which paid an impact fee, will be exempt from the new
PF Fees. Developers that pull a new permit before the effective date of this
ordinance will pay the City's existing impact fees. Developers that pull a permit
after the effective date of this ordinance will pay the new PF fees. The nexus
study used the most current data available (county assessor's roll + list of projects
the City was currently processing) to arrive at its estimate of existing
development—all development that paid or will in the next 60 days pay the old
mitigation fees is treated as existing development for the purpose of the nexus
analysis.
Section 3.28.040 means the City is establishing a basis for enacting PF fees for
any number of facilities, but that the matters specified in the council resolution
Hon. Members of the City Council
July 13, 2004
Page 2
(amount of fee; benefit and impact areas; specific public improvements; their
estimated costs; and the reasonable relationship/nexus determinations) will be
established only upon adoption of an implementing fee resolution such as the
resolution presented tonight. This means that these matters are being established
for the fees set forth in the resolution proposed for adoption tonight, but not for all
facilities discussed in the PFFP.
Bingham McCutchen LLP
bingham.com Section 3.28.060 means that the City will make fees payable at the times
permitted under Government Code section 66007.
Sections 3.28.070.A.b and 3.28.080 refer to credits and reimbursements when a
developer constructs facilities or provides services that are to be funded by
PF Fees. The ordinance treats the developer's provision of the portion of such
facilities or services with a nexus to that developer's project as an in lieu payment
of PF fees, and uses the terms "credit" and "reimbursement" when addressing
construction of oversized facilities or provision of additional services.
We thank staff for working with us to answer the questions we raised.
Sincerely yours,
Marie A. Cooper
cc: Carl Eric Leivo, Ph.D., AICP
Gabrielle Whelan
Mary Grace Pawson
Kevin Pohlson
Craig Harrington
30165404_1.DOC
City Of Rohnert Park
From The Office Of
Armando F. Flores, Councilman
July 13, 2004
Waste Committee Report
G
1 fi3 --D
1. The Mechum Road Site was established in 1971 in a canyon.
2. The site produces meths a ga .
3. Currently there is a problem with the liner and a leachate is being produced.
4. The Water Quality Board has mandated that the leachate level be lowered.
5. Tipping fees have been increased form $55 per ton to $70 per ton.
6. After the leachate problem has been resolved, tipping fees are expected to be
reduced.
7. There is a 10 -year usable life projection for the existing site and east canyon.
8. If the west area is developed, the viable life of the site could be 20 years.
9. The new Joint Powers Authority is not presently in effect since 100%
membership is necessary.
10. I recommend that the Council request that Jake, as our representative,
support the development of a plan of action that includes a timetable.
With these elements in place, the Council will have a sound basis for
future decision-making.
Water Issues Report
1. Our city wells are capable of producing 4 MGD. The average amount
provided is 1.6 MGD.
2. During impairment conditions, the City would receive the number of MGD
that is currently being negotiated. City wells would provide the water
necessary for residential acceptable levels.
3. City wells are utilized, on a rotation basis, to maintain operational status and
production viability.
4. Recent studies have reaffirmed to sustainability of groundwater in the Santa
Rosa Plain.
5. The City Water Model Project has been sent to the engineers for their
evaluation and analysis.
--4f � ,i ss� d`i. .';- ,ei .,•.; `ww 7 � .. R. ya r wt 1. :yam. p. J�;9' r ;5.-r.:f.... i �(�,, .. r.. .s --;;_.r
i,. s 1 s.`*. Y' is'. rA. 5 ..i",, t b;.n.;k i i i, "f'yk y ".� f�" y �:' � s_i' � �.:•c tx '4+' tA, t;+a�°.4 �, f:"
�. .�: :,�,. s �''�'� i�•R •^'; ^� Fx�. �# Y � a'� '-i's d"'':�y�. n �'- '+� �sk,.�` '•� y�.s�Ae'.. Vit' b. �:�. y.,.
,. .... _z,•n. .� .•rv.....,•..5'' ..i ,:h'ii _...-f •r�,, ,y. `.. ,.. !.:4.R. .�''ixf YK l.. i .may. A• -t. �^r, _.�' !-t' f:.i''- _ ,�i �.�y.T �`s+'., ++•::+Yw
�yay 2 ,�.. �,t!�...•-.?5{,�'' .t.•M1..�.. .d!,t.. ..;.)).i ry ,3� ... •,+.y;.1 .. .: ,�.? .r,�+'ax.'�t,,;` .``��-ky �y�p !ty::��wa'��y. �,_ aat��?,�'j${�':m 7y�t^... �-i '�-�.�:x..
...� . • k. d,.»�� �,40�y ^wr '�ti:. < L'. F J ♦' ... .. l �� � �ty� �� i. ,�.ry�r N `�<aLti ' 1 :j�
1 , � ;:sx s. ?:-+"y •:�.r>';iy ..tiss s'*' • .t. ro, i... �, ,r r •s �.Nn z:. xy k. n�.I .,J' q ° r. �;_ L srtjj
d. ` FF;f-.t«d �,�..;.'L�.a:.�"��fs' }:�: `'�,, �`h�•.`_°�'yt., ',zr'"•.�` •°� �'`s�F�--ri;;-.;-t� }�,.�` 'T ��aa,--... � .......t..... - �.:'��^ ,�,��'_�'8;. "'s-+t�iEi 3C i. "`�'...'�ia.., ^sf� .r,:4 •, � t....T,.� �.,zy = � �"�; :�.,1.
'�" •;,,t *_+F ' tai °s�s. .;�y 4 �.,, }.�' e. 'f". •i /ix -x•.'� �... •' .,,. ••titrid kd �Y.:3 ^'�. };' 7 y' lis ;��^;.�� k= yy,� � �.<µ 'I' w..,+. K. `f -'y +, d`+'�:. {,',
t ,s-: +`r.f ,�.,`,. 5 •.'49.. #4?.na -7`bx J-1 s.,,=t, x i.-�•..» '�i'a.r�s" d'�- r 'C: ».- ,.?;.. "$^fix ..Q .r.' tS.• `�_";.,'+`A :.
T
✓, - ..�> .e,< ,tib. �.t t � �-'' '�'� 6� �"�'; b•,, "'•- '� '�' .C.*.d!'x', _
. , r. _a., ° z .�s '.xF � , � '� r • =t - +c 'u�' 1 � 't`�s; ' `(�' �.` -x u _�d�
So.nlomaCoufnty.WasteManage
mu
,f
and Current Issues
Presentation to,the Board of Supervisors
June 22., 2004
t��
'D
Ionight's Presentation
:> Solid Waste System Overview
- Roles & Responsibilities
e10, Major Issue Categories
Disposal Issues
2
Waste Svstem uverview-
Roles & Res-'�onsibilities
m� All Jurisdictions - each contracts with private
haulers for collection services
$a County - responsible for all county solid
waste disposal sites
:� Sonoma County Waste Management Agency
— AB939, County -wide waste programs
3
Solid Waste System verview-
�� -each jurisdiction contracts with
private haulers
,P,v
ow Empire Waste Management (also Cloverdale Disposal
and Larry's Sanitary Service)
46f400 residential customers
North Bay Corporation (also Pacific Coast Disposal,
Rohnert Park Disposal, Santa Rosa Recycling and
Collection, Sunrise Garbage Service, West Sonoma
County Disposal, and Windsor Refuse and Recycling)
61f000 residential customers
Cloverdale
INDUSTRIAL EMPIRE WAS
RTING MA,NAGEMEN
-1
Healdsbu
r.,
Windsor
Waste Hauler
Service Territories
<Rohnerf�. ar-k SONOMA
` ARBAGE
otatiSonoma nt_. ELECTORS
N P I u ma
A
5
ste Svstem Overview-
Roles & Responsibilities
�� Disposal - County operates County -wide
disposal system
m� 1 landfill
6+ 5 transfer stations
m� 7 closed landfills
rei
•� � �� ��a �-�:- ��- .tom -��: ,.
CLOVERDALE
'Saw
A
onor'na
Annapolis
County Transfer Station Healdsburg
Landfill and_ Transfer Station n���,
�! HEALS
Transfer Stations
Guerneville ,
Transfer Station.
Occidental, SANTA
Trans rStationffl�
SEBASTOPOLU10. 101
.� !-ROHNERT 1
`� COTAT',I PARK
Disposal Site J t :.,SONOMA
PETALUMA
WTransfer Station N -, sonomanT
rransf
f L Municipal Landfill Station
x`20
4AN
1 PABLO BAY"
7
a
,..,��ii '" .�L,.}"���y �; ��.. �. ;f�'"� .'�-~>•.'� su •.w4 �sa�a'�'....ir" �.a�.�.�,n �Ry � i�,.. z.. �`s. �,•'� �r�c..• `» �:t.
!! - 7 .. �,* v V. ,.+4':i y tt � r &i.' �• v � �4 l , ,y t. �e;ri � i .��'i� - y'�. �.: AL �e(-s • v'Si'n�F i fir.:. 'n r � .s". X r}�t.
Vii.. !ry :;,�+{.ay yt 11{. H t s': yr " I �.� • �a 5i, ,*�; .,P n u k Fa � 'i •7 x �.. * a .y;
:'aMr�* � y,':','�'.( A''y �:�,� 3f^, yf !';`'`.,y�_ •�. .� d .,§ y::. F"fi� �'.. .e y: r
r: s,e1'. �.��;xi4• •T,,.. :� „�ia«r s.,,g• -�. .5 ' "' r.-.. «n:.a.., 3i�`:4". : ay' .!•�ti y 'h .+�,'�i, .m . �nL .' i'�S x 1 moi,'-.�#' ^ � . _ .}. i', t�,a.s...
. � �:r;. �" M,,,. y"''yt -'iX, r.0 .w„ ��+K;Fd:Sct �•r;^ �.• .':°!Y r .�.. �-•� -t; tg•7a4;'s'z.,. AQ'r'.s�F� P;"'Y' ••.�,�.... ��'. •�� ,�.._.�,.y,.'"�. F,,,�.::
. E.. :�- �',W � t .+ � , R i A � :` C't eN ry,�i,.. r "�.. e..p•. % r.. Y � � h �,. 7�. .Y .a.
s 4 - -a7 w Y :H r• w .w" �''` ,* i�
kr '' x. _`-�(�,�`rt• S. a r {
.�"4'�'° ie r s. t �•�; .�. k ,�'.? ,F'•: fi r! ,IC';"ua., ti R+ iv v„.•G. t „JFt4 u"" C ;y. i y �"9 sity c [d T1 'k:
�as'1'Su�s/r'3&a5t '- 1 T ., a=_',tfasd'.�- is� r 3 y1'.F fi .; �r •'Di. � �'"'�. #:; iY,,, !:::
Solid Waste System Overview-
-9-% -1,ito
gig les &
I/ibilitiesN g/
�ffh The Sonoma County Waste
Management Agency (SCWMA) is
responsible for A6939 regions
programs
u b
t
r
� k�� t .+ ��,`^Sf•�)a ARi �� � r. � �. tbi _'w; #'� A� r.'`tZ KF tts �"� � y. �: .4g5t� :yrt*�K.t �� Vit a `•:
-i "1{.. r � A� ., � �• f•... iC �.. e :A I:,.�fi-.r a `Z° � ,,� } ..E ,,.- .�'�'� �'i i )� �` t"�'� .r:y r � �i1" °�'�.
:a't +� '.��{ n;;# r?. L`t� k. � �. *f^`•� '' r q. 4 .ti' { �.,�+t ,.(.�, • i ! s ! j,,, „ � F �P�i�. r �{ y A 4, , # .> „�M'!.. '.�• � ..r�.:.`� >
"Y r r. yryr �fyr, {R.'� �� �9. � -d•- • r �'k. :. 4--o ar .i{.....,.>>•tr•.%' . w. �� w,c.�._ b��:�.' w,.�rg�6-�...:.�.�� off,.,.: p .•.....��.�:�s,..:.�;
a?' '•.d F Y� ..!� "' � "��t i �� �{;;.1�, ; }. � t �, y�'. ,.j�{�;.�,i''S N �� � "` rd. r +"$f' A? t �.:r ��`�•J� �#s5� i�� t4��;�x �+R i �`�°"i sJ3�3ts".� 8 =yt
'" i ::;i�a� '(.' s.{At'�u• .*„r #tt�.Ji p:{Y1,'..- r�lnr°y y •i�'n.'Li, ',r 'fi'yS' '�.'�§eihi''3�;-, ", +r s
yc. 'r""� � r' FF �,: y 4t ^ot �t. •res `yr
The Sonoma County Waste
Management Agency
aY Formed bFY`t.�;��``. ce to r, e rr d e n m n n n n owan..
I rIt Powers A,-il � � � sir . "i �y
i"""s�sts of th,e�nine cite of Son oma Count y
�a fpr: �
the Coun bf"Sono � a
_
h.
voted
Has six ori Ma=ry --re
�kr. v urisdiction a single
ponsibilitime s-
10
,��;. it '{+1C ..,.�} x 3. o ]� r+ F` )- e•: .. skha+n�t� tk8 ,s §E^'`� �jza S^�''�# �'c��'�..: ` '�?�.,�wi fik }•a° iY.. � ,�., .� } ;y, y�t4,
'� w' P7 .R� 4t..:�M1 �..�wfl•±T Fs', ,s ! is«q ..� '�i .^I��r•.���sr " i�, +i:. '� � r�.�i ,�'S'"e0.�'��k k r. y;,
11,s �' ^�. 3., }� �;+�' z:. �i �.s,:t..'��„ �.,a,�;,:t, .�,r i' ay. ,a-%�a_'.�a tet.-..�•^'�`' �� '���t?: � e..� +r .k
a '�;+',��` ��rF "►���'}�}-r�-` z�?"�` �',.' `�' � x � 3� .'~� a, �""+- . ��`�y��-'�'�•.Y@�.r,,�i �;;;m g'� ,''�' -Y" c �r �"-� �:.
'•� .k. -`';o i .�'ry 11 1. ';.ii' ,F.• '.�,k /x -. "'Rp� ?'seri:..,¢{: � r. r 3 )7 J' ' 2°� �Y. r°nr h .i• .yt t� '.'tNt+-: �;�" k,�, �� '�,,;;+�1��.� iR3. ✓ �+�?; '�', .F .5''s_•e'�. �. �
fb .-4' �+ aytl .q 4i .-;�� yyz,. I.Ay • ° 1 •�,�� M }� .a tt � �- y% iL..J+?"7 T s': f .:' C` tt
a �.��� � a-,,. r sG`-� r '��';�,�..� isr'. '" � ,. ' "� a > c''"�+rj� ,�;,r • � r , ,� �F ;�a,�� i:_ ' � x��' �. t � .
WMA'Respo,",.Sl'bi"litiol.,cf
Wood Wa,s-,,te-lPro ess��n
mbvYa rd {rite Processi n r
.JFt j 1 �k °� d�k fyiS. i
,Ilo'lwl, ousehold Haza rdous Wate ManAae�rnent
x wt ,,.y�kirw spa r 9N9'
Rec, C l inEd u ca�t� on ti
,- `
r 'wrntty � �"'�
r .� E
■ Sb' i t'' W a¢ te Di C�ersi'on �
�K�"" � ,fit fiy �_ , M�L
■
WasteMk F z �ae metIa n n
-,=9 .: g
11
. . . . . . . . . .
Wood Waste P-illocz?c1sin ou
Oft -0
Collected at the six
7i
e..
County 6�5_,;.praga.
Proces,ged'at Centrale
UIS PIO sai sito"•s,�� aro, 1.
fl'lect'
17
12'8GO tDn co
di~riW �✓ �pw1
Y� R
20
4.Is $247ton
T i p p4 bi, g� A b- e
q
End -uses, a `M%-�d,
products and
bio=mass
fuel
12
A 71K.1
1J
n
Ya rd Was e Pro' C V12- Ss b 91A
Collected at the six, County sites
qN,
Com posted,,atm hae;Ci�ien,,.tral Is
A4 Pr D
jpo
(temp .
grairty 10cation since 10F.Erl
82 P,2,w-_?! 0 0 tons c o'F, [e c t O'd in 2003ry
`3 0 /tO.;h,;tq,
41110 Tip g ,...&*'$
pt fee,
Work und",way
�`,.tb,,Aesta b I is h a
re,
Am offiith
e
COM C
13
Household Haz
�� Household T
Waste FacHrit
(opening late "."2004)
(®r Community Toxi
Collections
f1b Toxics, Rover p"ic
service
41; Toxics Roundups
discontir
14
e
F ?+ 7,
A.-,
-T-%
Ret.---j-vcling Ea'ucatioln
w..
Recyclin-Guide,
irwr 177-7.
4'i
t 4k
� rw,
DO
la,
15
Inf
C f N `�♦ '. PLY `i y.'. S� t� S t
Solid Waste Diversion
16
M
Waste Management Planning
posa MOW
Amenr'.
ditv Udp a"
ntegrated Waste
Management Plan. (CoIWMP)
17
k
4
ti S
r�•y
t
tet` t r a r 3
at-'gt
-';'1s
f s 3 ,�I �s wC>'�' 7E ✓ �� n +�� 'ss, p 'nL- � � c, f� .,� � .,x� }i R k a � �..� Cyst �frs�,r ia,% ■ �� �y,� ;. ��„�� ,�y i I� �. {
g 1a}
r M
�,;.
r
Current Solid Wastu
Management Plan -Over vie w.,
a-aOctober 2003, - SCWMA adopted 2003
Countywide Integrated Waste
Management Plan
�� March 2004 — Approved by California
Integrated Waste Management Board
W
t
t
.yk
. ��. � y..:� ,a;.{y^y'�!' <.. 41 r.I� � i2��` ,. se. �"� 4+n � •� : Y �. �`.. L': ) � a •,�:�. �P' � �G :y.0 ��.:�%'r�� ..n "f /.! F$.Fi' e'�Y':Se'S. .x x 19' :.`,7{ r.,a"'�'
t , +r, t � �.:', xf,. a, ..d' P .x:a � �P ` �': IE�i."�:t�, `. :f, F �3 � r .:J�� t �.. �' "� # ��. .� _."' i ,_ � � � y ! ,{ �� i,¢'..,r � �} ? • a � i •FF
�� Maximum expansion of the Central
Landfill
G-1; Site a new landfill in the County
Establish "flow control" agreement
between the cities, SCWMA, and the
County to direct refuse and green waste
to County and SCWMA facilities
19
y �Y i'"'nt}pF•�-• t7d ,O'j�+es4j, v�5. �t '�-.f��+Y <-! `4 -� -� � t% �d�; ;',. t � :.ii'n ��" rn:4,; �( '��ra-� t `.i.r P y �.�a 4. �,.� .p i . ft
r ' i .� -+� x.. i3H H� �. � :` a :s � ..,� � a t i .�• Y i ,.. � �.. } ..c fat �w� ._,fi y 3 ,t � f?'" 1 t..,
.K t =k (y"., t,_ J"�� .,.�:� +...tJ �, s.,:-#t6e.,t q5 •,„� �.:t� <rFti`. .:4 rs,. .r y. � rt: t:'� �a4. a} �..1 i,`.�'ti� :.E � r-se��
17
2003 CoIWMP (continued)
Develop a permanent, regional compost
facility -
R� Build anaerobic digester to make biogas
and reduce refuse volume
�a Mandatory recycling services
<, 7,0% recycling rate by 2015
20
WV
s kY
r�
2 �
4
'S. ��� :{ ._ .':: .._ .. .tet •�.t 4 h� � c �"' `
21
iPsrFf?�At,
MaV"or
Issue Cate_.,,00r
JAOV
��
DISpOSdI ISSU2S (topic of tonight's discussion)
Collection Licenses., Hauling and
Recycling Contracts (future)
�� Service and Financial Issues (future)
22
`•. a ..7"
,r"".,33w.3,.?_V•r - t 7-�. r.t�,'{. }�nt• .i.,- xr..:`3r.k5 ,'�"r�T , ..,. �,. a S•��"1ry.ro.:.;..�'R�.rj;�' ,�.. �y.#,:-:it;+t;-� ';. 'nC ii 3'tf: 's�#=.�� WY"I sW wy,.1
i 'W"i}i'�ti�A#rt^r+;.�R".fe+«. a�:tw-.. y1�j+ r y :�:.'i`.a- �, .., p r,�a. �-:'-_ F.r. j+.! .sw"'�Ls'i,r<"s.i�,,.� `+{ ':'5 3. �i i_ !)'.+-;�`t7 x=r•ry':y�i--. `T`'�} • F`�r`na� �rl � `,,•` :.r,. ty�r,�. '?ry. .,.��7 . . �w�
'.:
a 3 � ��' :`" # .. tr'S �..:�,e,sn.�r�e:.ad.` �F ra,.=,f3 �^r! ' r� i r• s
r.'V'i,! �''i �.'i!�i.C..r¢`F,y: '?�� ,. �� �u :ia ai r1.. :::v .'r t�'",� r'!Y. '4 ". FW`3:. �w•.a�� �. r..; ••4.,��.��.ry" �u-,'�`i+,fi� •'r_I Y�!'a�A�: �:. i.t .+c
� y ,4 � •.�� e,1{ r.0yx»+� � 1 �'. � � r; . a # _.°✓w� i• � 4 F..� ;`s»s$ r� y � 3 %� a 4� � �,i
Future Issue Catoorories
s
Collection Licenses, Hauling and Recycling
Contracts
m+ Interim Hauling and Disposal Agreement (exp. 6/05)
�� Transfer Station Operation and .Hauling Agreements
(exp. 9/07)
mi Recycling Agreements (exp.,9/05)
b� Garbage Collection License Extensions (exp. 4/11)
23
,, 1 f° * �?;v, tit -x � �•� ti,s'.. �;, r ;n,2 . ,t,'�� �` t %`� j+ e.:�i +� �k�M g r' 't�. x ^;
t,o Y .,i .:�1 x ru, .,4. w v h 'k�a% �• S E � 1: q;�.R•r h" s 7 ,,,� ,,,_ ��• � s`.
k� 1 �.i�..s� rt" �'�[.. * �(({,. f �''Ii �,.•, . :� ��-E�iw, ,. k' '�-�'� iia i�� �r�yifi`, �f"t 7, N''f �'�� .� g 3 y�k`;>
r
�. s .Y •, J �. d1gg r'. �,F ��a w. A s �{ 7 � � `L 4 r v ��, t M n F 1, 2 5.
a �'' .:,� 5 t '. s9�'x`�'t r., a,�• + '_,. s 'T �S _ a` t j r3"jk•= �. • ;•y• v
Puture Issue CatOCY
ebories
�r Refuse Services and Financial Issues
`� Refuse Division 20 -Year Financial. Forecast
ma County Disposal System — cost reductions
is Feasibility of mandatory pick-up in
urbanized unincorporated areas
`a Analysis of uniform refuse rate structure
24
..,i y � '1 .i'""'P� � f !'irP .:. K�' .�=T� C. N :. ::�}.P � a 11 � �' ,�.^�.^ 1" 3 i�Y/' � X:y. � � yi Y .. :4 }+"' ` i Z' ,�.; � y � s•,T 1
�yy n .k 3 � l r s y 1^ � �a N t •+ u f tT + e, L� .0 .W, fw� h 1'� : ! y��,,,�� r r+.:: Y ,� w.•
y � `'�C� r Sw . +'y�. x.z. .,r.YS »� "� + .. u ani i.`°i�" r . s � r : �• �.x T c
.�. � �..p.�kw. Jf 'im:,.9ti�wd^i„�" .r"�iy:y� � f '".;1..' '� < r �� ±w.;dY , ,�';� X;;'•. r. 'u�.eu'.-."u. � r �. Lbt�:_y;��� e � �y.,� {}f.'�� :,� t � ; < ^v `"'Swi y�::t�
rw "'rt n ti �� 'Y 7t• 3...s n.} i� rr + {' ^"��''^
f s{ , v 1 8La rsj'i• ,� y;3� r � �. ,g +#:i+wtwtx„ 4� .y �-> � n:i $'' :i � � } p h:r. fcT�,� � .Y (, �:x.5 � � T'� �� ti.� � �'�*""" `'' s' `.
� .e4 + �� ,?,:.. r{ . ? • • �n� r a �..• � '°°' ,, 1'`A 4 r . � f £: r 3 ¢.++r"` . Yi. ��vt. ��` •' c'�� +a'
Dioopl"losal Issme.-S -
�� IDelay to the Central Landfill Expansion
schedule is causing a disposal issue for
Sonoma County.
25
r
ilk
��'' �+ +.: Ct.• s + �'. �. v.l `, �� iY''s4t t .( ` ,�c 4; 2C.p.,�*r F3itl ;r F ;'.�" r {.^ st .ir:, e1a:,'.
�i s ni'; ��, Ir?�i.�0 .,q � ,.,. 1e a*. f �.:•�, h^� � � m8. r -F �' .+. � �..,; ✓� � {�� � � �
- . � +'. "'^'t�Y " v.C! 'L I 3 M+S.•. �Y! -. '`'C � . Y 1+ � 'Yt Ki4:. � � b ��` SiT Y!P1 .Df 3 `.^�'
DiSpinosal Issuve-Ov
�� The County has established a team to
work with the,Water Quality Control.
Board to resolve, disposal issues .
dvoffh The team has prepared aWork' Plan to
address both short and long-term
disposal needs for Sonoma County
m
.i"'" 9. est ' j �\ � ' z�" �,, it' i� a � n �.. � �ti-r 3� f ..µ !. � ,f t --'•ie ! i
..;Y �� i;: �' �� �"' �.'n� •�^ t� t e F � � { t k; 411,
-
� � 3 .a��^� zr '�, r �u ., �- .y 7 ^'�+r ,w . ,y a ,• r _y. ^� ""'�"'s`""'T*' �, � ,�,,_f :a
� n � :,�/4. w J i; K •9 �� .)k. �b'.,� ++;i �a .. st � t + a'° c zra. `''� +P` < �9 �g +'p41,.:.... t.`^,
F 7. ' �' Y k•�,; �x " t ++�„ r � I � °'�, r , A { . • i c-§! � t'# .�"`r ar Y, ,+ ya{ r' d+ �d �... 4s�,.
B
�..'-
I-Roc,pl,",osal Issme-Sy
�� Background on the cause of delays in
landfill expansion
�'I; Short-term Solid Waste Disposal Work
Plan
Reassessment of Long. -term Solid Waste
Disposal Plan and update 20 -Year
Financial Plan
27
r '+F`.� Y3'`••$ fi� d•,A a K*. .6a i ti'
RAW - „iy ,,''"!.
i�
kv
y�,
-i�...,,.^.�1 ter.. ;... c„�. 'M +.Lii. �r�•ak,`!� flf u'
Tf�
. h
•°; 3-+t: n .yF f,•.� ri �r ,A.: ,c-�`'� 'S v' t b"� v .,+r. 'o } �'..»
a•�The Central Landfill site opened in 1971
�� East'
Canyon expansion opened for
operations in August 2002
W.
29
411p, "Constituents of Concern" were
detected in the underdrain from under
the new liner in May 2003
401A.11 RWQCBpermits for future liner
construction have been delayed
30
`'"°'
a=. ti." s �, - � nl ,'" i'r ✓req;, ff ` n Y 1 f .j yy
aYt 7,....:±. 7� ! Y t'�$ d 4 tRl} <'Fk - '..'-'C•�iY3 �. 5 i �,+CS a
s 1, ,y, r ! :#°'�°fsR6�`"a, �. �rf '+ssF p��R.q-#-a Y". r � .air•"!�'}�« �+�^-� 4 'T a. .: 31 k t. l 2 �l �a� .::?t ("" ,�#°
'i'b .,s 1
4
3 1
:moi" ..,ea
Background, (continued)
ghApril 2004 - County began hauling 30%
of municipal solid waste, out -of -county
to allow time to work with Water Board.
on these issues
41'; July 2005 — Currently constructed solid
waste disposal capacity will be filled
32
; 0
e
a �� ���... ".x,' .c:',t ,d' ..! t �� „f�, s` I S. t..z. u x � �;'� ,.e, r ��� •"'i x'�' 'f •-�,�9. �:s."3` ^i
:r . f+. *{ F. ." a ;.. }!r r ;�`TP�- j �:.; i .♦ � " _s �+ 9 �f��-: `'r .t.'. ,/flT'Iq��_�j�y L � '' � a*� i � i,s�a
1} ..;ii. `� 4t ' �� �' " £ � 3,: t . -pp� ,,'rFF y ''y.4: -.s ^�.; •*a } ' "e 'en t
+Y..«� �.. t''"";4a x4. ti'ar ml" q;, xi~ "�sL.. < �,.F`�,.h'f i""` .S..F ��Y`i%¢4s�w �,F',4M ..��K`r'sG' „y'wn6 'k_.+'at. x ta.. a..•,F ,:
r. :� '�-`� ��..e+..: . � �>_,...:kyw� ,� �'}5 r -.: , .- .cu y �s � '9�;:r!'� �`' ,.;`.._"" ^sr' r�-tZ;r".—*•idrr.
. _ 1. '« � a.. ,:� i'.-..' t � . ? ;r:. d .•: `7 fR a+ '`.. �'K � t i °.''. '�" "� M� b } iY 4 +�` -Y .. b X
.. x � e �., v 7 � ... . � � - yy � + j .: � � x ��W:.�wd .�r1X�7,f ���iw � �.{ `. �.y +�� �` p. k� .�� (�•. L�� i. .w �"i
L a y, h g L [". i F; ia..9'r; .. a ,# 'k'y, "�tl } 4- ,.y, �. �p+l. 4 4 � } �� � 4 � n } 3 . �{x�t . � y� 'Z 3' h:,t S J 1 ,�,,•w-u7:y hn � x u
� 4 , _ R. � � r �t ��, ray ,��, t� i y •�a ��� y�.� �.� s r4 ?aS �� �, �: {, ,� �t �^ .� � $a�,�y+ ���, ,
�� Leachate and landfill gas issues at
Central
flo Develop short-term landfill expansion
plan
,41; Additional landfill issues
33
E �
.°e i 6 � 3F � c i�x �1 r1 't . t tt.. ., °� % • f 7�i' ef' °`s `
„iia •f.' � � 'T�;: �, ,:�:x{} .tr' _, y.. •r :.� �. ,.r, { t c ,. r .!'.` { .� � `a� ��4 �.. ' #. a� dt �� � �', ,4, ..
^..x.. .,¢. ..-sf.��,. ..v.t:,�y 4 R." � �,i'."n.�'�� ._ � t ��' { i.'" ��S• S^•Pam { .^""Sa � ,N �;'e �`�y-i�+j".....-� i .L. E „1. ��`ry. ..-r r_.
k° � y : � 4 s �K � t ti�r �, � � .t�:. 4 ,rt•^_ 1 .�^A y x >y 4 _Y'� 'w,ft r '.2 �Fnry ��1� J � � �•� xa-:7.��
4 NOV
Leachate aff"Ud Lal"Ildfill Gas Iss"t'.
��
Must reduce leachate levels in old
landfill & demonstrate control of landfill
gas to prevent potential migration
m� Develop conceptual -model of landfill site
+.Enhance leachate and landfill gas
extraction efforts
d+ Develop corrective action plan
6� Monitor to demonstrate effective control
34
.33, � '� � +• .w,t r ='>w k i,yw{' +a dk � .7�Jr _'�' � c '.�_ �x r ;` a ti
.,.:4y.6,,y '�l 3.,, F^: d 5. rL y ✓'• .F, >4 .i a•/x r
`�
4' :Et � >. .1` ♦ Y$:x '.A, ! ; ���. -. 'i'i r4;a£,hE Ej
^Exs� x ,,��jj6 m.,. �.. :Xd f-`:�I a;� ��c �{+ w t` w� i _fi• .,(�. j�. $ � . F "1 ���. 'i..4 -a
:. �� "� - ,, �'t I:1W�.,x �� {- �:� . t 2 ..'as: ';k. ..� r � i'_ .r.ab� 'i ,� -. s;a.:. �"::__�.. � .,.k7:`.«.'�1... � f?b�'-� a �3+� f•^'..
} - «s ,j${ -x'+' a r .+ '..'4s .,,+,M �-•'w.�ai .� � war,.. yE,- ?*< �g +{ vw..; 'i=,'�`
1 :'`s Y "�.1. 4 c1F.�''9 „i $�p• Ct g"+�u
r 3..� R ! _� Y'�+yy �' .r 4 7{ .0 Y.��„_ 46 y t:. , Sr.;gr s.” 1 . Y, i. + �� w ! • .I ,.' ✓ F'� ..t 'r...
ltNXiiuofr+�sf.� r t-
iiYGb.ripi :1 111 i`r . tiY Pr ,Yf
Short -Term La.",,dJ"1-11 Expa.".1sion Plaff".s
4� Pursue 3 potential areas of capacity
expansion
ma Rock Extraction Area (ry 3 years)
�i East Canyon Expansion Area (N 5y ears)
Existing Compost Operation Area
(N 2 years)
35
36
R+�����
F `7c "
J•
v r �a:
r„`
f+
e'+�:. 'fi•�A'rii�i. .�� as'•:�.xxn �. ''r, �''a 9
��.:F', '"_. s`.. i� � {' � �.. l rxt �
w 4 v.
J R
'!t,< 1 �i{., � � .'A X i .
x, .. 6v3? r,.J�c�r.:f a. �d. .: .�•. LQ`w• i_':�
.,^.4....... .'gJ:-a+c',.
."'�`-',�-: i• -�k3 �`' `+t'i'p,
" �• � r t i �7. �t
l •.. < 1
t Y''v � Y.: .i• • }•n i .II ,�`' . x4C
� a'M1__:i SJ d sT «�. •r+
`
'y>;< ' rt
! ar`
Y 1 `: SF' i•
.� �. .'"�}'�s.
k. `•;txdfk�,(}yV-
T. �m'F, ,ks,,, 'e ,_`,� f?b y°�:i
i
�� atrr f
R t
x {� ♦ ;�` .ep 3• � ;N '� �'
ir'r�.: sa3i%� ' ��:Jj ��
�'.r.� �..,+k'ie -;ni
�re:
..i ya.
t.
F'i4ii:
F? ''N
S.
a�
•i. _ • ` ,�.'R't'..* ""9
#'. .{ A":P4."'�Y m5;: v>•y�F ^N. .ei 1. ifX.
b. ,��.r Y.. y*. �^` ia- �e
f"y.' !rYP7d -rtY.. .^^fT4, � *i; yy'.i Lx s
� y Jam-, i ..y` .t§��M19Y�.
.�..,. .u...xr,.,ra> .d .3.�3—„-...-2..
5 K � : A; 'R+: 'M 1�i
�. {1 'ry':P�: r/k uT .�e:.4'. �•
�. `'.+� K�i ..Y
�•i..q yj '� .i � \� ��
.?nml� �g"i�11 i..
�; Jt.E 1. 5•s. 4•�
1].ypt
-.fi � kF- y�.
_
-4. 5. �
.711'x,. {� }�x- .�Ar�
'/'::c.> .� L = .�i.�. �:4•.
fit:, yF � ;�:' h ���
f Vii_.
'� ..:�
A,� ..Sri' . h��#.5' ai, 7 " f'2': ��'�-'1Y+.`>•�4ra. ^�'s
,,.... .. �
:..� :.y^. '° 7�rr��}'e.. r �Y.f � i t•$
4y'...1
�.'?;�r4 .yep+ 4r
f
,
k.�r.*�ise! w`.. �d�k�,� � �
.��t
�"$
u
= F J". .< C4't
{-•.FY �.t
a•Y'.
•"ort -Term Landfill Expansiollit, I&
IS/ 'Plans
�� All 3 potential areas of capacity
expansion require -
m+ CEQA documentation
d+ New Permits
�+ Water Board approved liner design
37
t(t
r`•'!i •k :i..`e7i.a3..� ,�'.it- "� 4:1':=z .a RE.`.' { J ,�3;:., tF i•' 1'
"'�.ir....} _.� �, : a �t^-•+•. ^' k, � 7'r" `# _ �.... .. x c � ...Z' ..,�s .� .- c r � :N.
i dt t m �,r t sa . p:�.,,s,. S r'� 1 a � ,..?•. ,� '}�. �j J �� kM.
;1U
#,'.�,� .t :5^ •.. {, ��.•+....._ `�fi 7`� �i ." :•�,� i�• � .:, �1 '' .i%�rjd� .as.G` :d��'e
Additional Issues
�� New site for composting of green waste
�a Due to delay in the start of construction
of additional landfill liner, after July
2005,,.all Sonoma County municipal
solid waste may go out -of -county for
disposal for an interim period of time
38
p� County plans to hire a consultant to
reassess the long-term waste disposal
plan in the CoIWMP
�� County needs to update budget
forecasts with new data and revise the
20 -Year Financial Plan
39
-77 7
T
'44.,,_,t �s �, .. ��`��f. �: �� t 'S' �, i .s,� r _X � z': ,� q"`ryir,},� � �+ �5 ,� .e.�.P, ra � '� ��t �,,.s, v�p
'44
Lo,nlg-term Q:,,*=
(1) Assess feasibility of West Expansion
High development cost due to site conditions
,esv, Permit issues due to proximity ,to old landfill
,P
Need for additional property
(2) Evaluate siting new landfill in Sonoma
County
(3) Anaerobic Digester to reduce waste
volume and make renewable energy
40
f '• .. .t.Rt§i y �1.��
.r. sy " w. , is �✓•,• �. P
. .,, !i'�345 �.., "_, yMr 3�'�t sy •.a,,i 'y . w+�:,`�.n.r Cs�'rp��.� "S'.:t: i. �. r l.e"y _ �`3'''i �';;�� �o: ;'.'l;k �jA'''� �,. t: �, r � ,,�+y ,
'� Y ' F 'r4 �y d «, . 1. .� t,}� - s.�. . d R,'is r^# ��.'i"_ i°4b f :-a r , ats"r �r;� s. • •^'v°^,r.:$.n Z -� :Y.� :L;r"i e si::•
' t � aC:. q t, �. r •,wi rM1 �� �� � r �% F P ' r„' �r i. •.. S, � ;'��. k. �... � - ..1:..
,,, -�=. � ,:.m.� 1 '. �' �.. +N •• `�.-:,-...� � n'ci,. : 9..'e`'' i,�::. � µa . ' �..,.::i ae�,� E.. �., , ''P'�t'c,,.�-� '� �� �•�:`'i .9` S� "s�.
#:-, a. X .. A "y� ��� -`'.:.�k� S' � < n� °s�.•••r LK Ly:♦� t 4..i- •:� R"�' ,Y..,.^T : r ,-..�!, , 3�"�,r��-`.a..=. ;:,�c �'�, . `4- ,•'R'F+'vt. s+Y--r-•"'--2�-
' S fi
,{.�y-�'.� e. �. i:�°'=y� °'.i'"a k'§isd �' # � rn,+�v• r :H, .�:r r ,. a :"P.Y•.... `� t � iP. ,�,�.,.� �� �,., WeK''t'��.: tr~.
.jtr .wt -:;� `�. - 'f�'L. 'qw 3^ ,• `, s .y� :Yr k Y . 9 '+-• ,t. A_'�yw��..' W�a�'..
Options
Additional Long-term
Evaluate Feasibility of:
(4) Hauling all refuse out of Sonoma County
=a Loss of long term control
(5) JPA assuming greater responsibility for
disposal
(6) Privatizing all or part of solid waste system
(7) Other options?
41
t � F 3 a Y.'','s �' " �•: A }'^ �a�i�fe � 1~ �r �. �.� �� i 91 a - � ..�; r r a 4',s{ �.+� r x 5x{+r(i�t /''T is3a ad` Z �x 7� y�s�',.'�d '�..+'S. ��n� .;ori .�a'
4®r.
� '�:I�ir t. y ,..r -.�.•• '1 e } .` s+ jh .r' J„,..i�.a.4 � _rye �'' ,�„f?F'. d �� � �4��`'C� �.t "S�� � *"-f.
r
Requ,rested Board Actio."..
f� Direction from Board on which long-
term solid waste disposal options to
evaluate
�� Direction from Board on whether to
establish an ad hoc committee to work
with staff on future issues
42
I j
Benefits to R 0
f N
hnert Park
t�
�Y
0 $5.9M for local street maintenance, traffic calming and
ITS
c� $0.4M for Copeland Creek/Laguna Trail
o Funding for 101 bike/ped crossings
0 $188M for Highway 101 from south of Petaluma to
Windsor HOV lanes
o $23M for SMART including grade crossings, final
engineering &stations site development
o $19M Penngrove improvements including Railroad
Avenue interchange
0 $25M for Sonoma County Transit — including funding for
transit/paratransit in Cotati
DALY SALES 406-2633902 07/08/04 10:27A P.003
Brill
irillt
fhone:503-691-5645
Ton free: 1-800-455-6281
1995 SWU"be. 71989% 08 91M
Emat. 8218solecOldmCILCOM
Web: Www1mcledtaclLcom
DALY SALES 406-26SSS02 07/08/04 10:27A P.002
I
f f
PortableJPermanent Recycled Rubber Speed Hump
Overall parabolic shape falls.within.accepted-I.T.E specifications,
with a rise from 3/8" on the leading edge up to 3" over a span of 7'.
40'
14'
Restrictor Street Lump 40' Wide Street
Posted Speed 25 MPH
Bill Daly
Daly Sales/Recycled Technology
San Jose, CA
(408) 203-1172
4 2'
1'
1'
DALY SALES 406-2699902 07/06/04 10:27A P.001
Daly Sales
1249 Malone Road, San Jose CA 95125
Phony/Fax (408) 269-9902
Pi%c7rA it .r -R f_W 07-20Cg7A
Quotation
Erica Ruiz
St Joseph Health System
Sent To: - Community. Benefit
90. South E Street; Ste 303
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
(7.07). 522-1571.
Fax 525-5383
TOTAL $6,605.50 • ..
REF NO.
QTY
Salospmson Bill Daly
Quoto number
Dato 71112004
Customor ID
TSR -25
1
Terms Net 30
Est DoWtory Date 7-14 working days ARO '
Shipped vra LTL
1
FOB j point of origin'
Prepaid/Coliacr prepay & add
Tax exempt
Reason
Quote good for 60 days due to
flucuating shipping costs.
Ululav To
Name' Same
Adokets (line 1)
Addws (line 2)
City, State a Prov.
Pnstalcoda, Country
Company frame
rica, thanks for your interest and the"
pportunity to quote. Please call if you
ave any questions.
t? `t '\ c f �
d y a
ot
PRICE
DESCRIPTION EACH TOTAL
ntriclor Speed Hump, to fit 40'
reet, split to match attached
swings
I' Speed Hump, Split 14' x 6' 5,440,00 5.440,00
14',14' in direction o1 travel
xcial markings per drawings 100.00` 1 D0 00
;bedded high -reflective tape
riang'includes mounting
vdware and materials
ornponents made in US out o
cycled car tires,
11 components are modular and
hese may be eligible for
gent, duo to recycled
ill Daly
lobile (408) 203-1172
s STOTAI $5,540.00
!tach Sates tsar. t1M! 415.50
SHIMM49MANDUNO 650.00
Met
5-t
C -Gb rzp wavy; rb c lc—L,
p� C1Le-f--K�c�eo `1 vj�- C vt
cNt..�-- 6,C
6k CA ci c� r CI�o55v`,�c,�
"� v.1 � v 1L , -t- � \ L2 I�,1 G� C.� � i S �.�(/L� �•Jl tom' L� v- e Gi
1 r +=
rN �. 1 So �v�.e ���-� Y t� wi � � a
�.
c{ tom. p
c� Lk,,. k' -�-�
RA V
Ri7q VC)
. e'l7d L-Orc/Rcnc
I)FSC'PIPTIOM OF RlIII DIPIC-,
PARCEL / y S
SHEET OF SHEETS
.,-tr:
O
0
C-4
■■■��■��i�02■■■®■Ic�■e®onoommr��
�i �■�a
_
■1
l■�=■m
M■■■�■ ��
■Own
mill
■
■�■■■■■0
MEN
MINI IMINIM
mmm
mmm
WE NEW
■lELl�111
■■■■■■■■■■�■�I■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■�1
- • •
■�
■�lS!■■■■■
■NEW
■Q*■�:��Gl�■■■�■■�111�■■■■■
■�■
■�■��■
■
NOMINEE
MEN
ON W��
NME=o�Lw4rz.
■
NEON
9 MOON
■�'/R
�■���■�
■MWN� WERE
INCOME
■■■■■■Im�■■■■�■re■■�■■�I■■■■■■■■■
■I�■I■
MOMININ■
■■■
■®■e
E ffi!■■■■■■■■■NE
IN ■■■■■■■�■■
s i •-
■■■■■■�w�■■■■■■�■�■■�■�■■■■■�■aE7E�■■I■■F1/A■
■[1■�■�I
r r■ ..�._- �IAL�f■■■■■■■■■■■■■I■I■■■■■�■■■■BE
■■■■■■■■■■■■
■�■■■■■■�■■■
MMI
■
-
Modification FactoT i
.. . , nDMINH
® i
SAME
�WF—m�
Noma
FIMME,
__-_-_
it • ' c
____Em
__�_
ff.=
99".
1101100001011
1111111111100
011000
Irmo
11010100111111
11000011111011
MOINES
11100011000
WON
...�
..CC■
C
o.MIAMI
:C�.....
MaQVIVAI..1
• .
mmflmm1�
V
.,-tr:
O
0
C-4
JHN-b5-lyyb X1:1'7
P.01.02
�G. & L. Service Planning 3965 Occidental Road Santa Rosa CA 95401
FAX
TQ
(pacific Gas and
Electric Company
Chuck Scobel
Phone:
Fax phone: 707 521-3505
CC:
Date: 7/7/04
Number of pages including cover Z
Sheet:
From:
'tom Porter
Phone: Co#707-579-6480
Fax hone; 707 579 6148
REMARKS. ❑ Urgent x For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please comment
Mr. Scobel,
Please find the attached Electric Rule 16 tariffs which outlines PG&E's policy for setting electric metering
equipment.
Let me know if you have any further questions.
Tom Porter
Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No.
Pacific Gas and fflectric Company Cancelling Revised Cel, P. U. C_ Sheet No.
i
San Francisco, Callfomio
ELECTRIC RULE 16^ -SERVICE EXTENSIONS
(Continued)
D. RESPONSIBILITIES FOR NEW SERVICE EXTENSIONS (Cont'd.)
2. PG&E RESPONSIBII-ITY (Cont'd.)
a. SERVICE, METER, AND TRANSFORMER (Cont'd.)
4) METERING. When the meter is owned by PG&E, PG&E will be
responsible for the necessary instrument transformers where required,
test facilities, meters, associated metering equipment, and the metering
enclosures when PG&E elects to locate metering equipment at a point
that is not accessible to Applicant,
5) TRANSFORMER. The transformer where required, including any
necessary switches, capacitors, electrical protective equipment, etc.
When either a padmounted or overhead transformer is installed on
Applicant's Premises, the Service Extension shall include the primary
conductors from the connection point at the distribution supply line to
the transformer and the secondary conductors, if any, from the
transformer to the- Service Delivery Point.
P.02f02
15605-E
14884-E
(T)
(T)
b. SPECIAL CONDUIT INSTALLATIONS. PG&F shall own and maintain
service conduits only if-, (1) they are located in•the same trench with (T)
distribution facilities, and (2) when it is necessary to locate Conduits on
property other than that owned by Applicant, as determined by PG&E, or as
may be required by local authorities.
c. CABLE -IN -CONDUIT, In those cases where PG&E elects to install its
service conductors using pre -assembled cable -in -conduit (CIC), the conduit
portion will,�e considered a part_ of the conductor installation provided by
d. GOVERNMENT INSPECTION. PG&E will establish electric service -to,
Applicant following notice from the governmental authority having jurist
that the Applicant -owned facilities have been installed and inspected in
accordance with any applicable laws, codes, ordinances, rules, or
regulations, and are safe to. energize.
Advice Letter No. 1765-E
Decision No. 97-12-098
28856
Issued by
Thomas 15. BoHorff
Vice President
Rates 8 Account Serylces
(T)
(Continued)
Date Piled May 11. 109Q
Effective July b, '199ti
Resolution No.
Honorable Mayor, Council Members and Citizens of the City of Rohnert Park
The Rohnert Park Employees Association would like to take this opportunity to address
this City Council, Mayor and the Citizens of Rohnert Park regarding the upcoming Recall
Election. It is our heartfelt belief that when the City Council voted to accept the
Memorandum of Agreement with the Federated Indians of the Graton Rancheria, they
were acting in the best interest of the City and its citizens. -The recall of Armando Flores
and Amie Spradlin is an unfair persecution of these Council Members who, when faced
with the possibility of a casino being built on the outskirts of our city without any money
to mitigate the impacts, negotiated an extraordinary agreement that was designed to
provide money to mitigate those impacts.
The agreement includes annual donations of
• a million dollars for local school programs such as sports and music
• a million dollars for local non -profits and human services programs
• a million dollars for low income healthcare
• a million dollars for low income housing and neighborhood projects
• five million dollars for the city's general fund
One-time donations include:
• 15 million dollars for traffic improvements related to the casino
• 3 million dollars to build, equip, and staff a Public Safety facility
The Rohnert Park Employees Association also believes it was very important for
the City Council to protect the citizens of Rohnert Park by negotiating that
agreement because the City did not have the authority or resources to wage any
resistance to the casino coming. to the location just outside Rohnert Park. The
Rohnert Park Employees Association supports the difficult decisions the City
Council made to protect our City from facing the same problems as Alexander
Valley.
Therefore, the Rohnert Park Employees Association opposes the Recall Election
and hereby declares its support of Council Members Armando Flores and Amie
Spradlin in the upcoming recall election on August 24`h.
In Closing, we encourage Rohnert Park citizens to vote "NO" on the recall.
Thank you.
James Grundman Angie Smith
RPEA Political Action Committee RPEA President
a��Zke'd -fv P(esen L�anc�`l
v rrt in wfGS
The Proposed Golf Course Dr./Wilfred Av Interchange
Design and Financing
—My name is Linda M. Long.
I reside, with my family, at 944 Helene Court in Rohnert
Park, our home for 21 years.
~My street backs up to Golf Course Drive.
~I would like you to address the following concerns
regarding the design and financing of the proposed Golf
Course Drive/Wilfred Avenue interchange project.
--The design of the proposed Golf Course Drive/Wilfred
Avenue interchange has been referred to by one city council
member as "scary" and a "night mare" indicating there were
other "much better" designs (city council meeting May 25,
04).
—If you walk west on Golf Course Drive, stop at 101 and
peek over the freeway, you will see that Golf Course Drive
directly aligns with Wilfred Avenue.
Wilfred Avenue is the street on which the entrance to a
proposed casino is to be located.
--The current interchange design has Golf Course Drive
progressing under the freeway straight through to Wilfred
Avenue.
This would cause Golf Course Drive to become a super
highway to the proposed casino.
Stations Casinos, the company financing this casino
project, as part of their business model, primarily garners
roJ
patrons from local communities surrounding their casinos
(CNBC July 7,04)
This particular proposed casino would generate close to a
half billion dollars in annual revenues.
These revenues would be heavily dependent on huge
amounts of traffic to and from their facility.
Stations Casinos would have to reconcile with Cal Trans
concerning the enormous traffic impact on 101.
That would include dumping traffic on to. surface streets.
Golf Course Drive would be a primary recipient of this
traffic under this interchange design.
~We have only to look to our neighbors to the north to
realize the impact of this casino traffic.
They have had words creeping into their traffic vocabulary:
Words like brinks trucks, buses, shuttles, jake- braking and
last but not least 24/7.
Several months ago I learned from the traffic division of
Public Safety that there was no law preventing such vehicles
from making there way down Golf Course Drive.
—I've recently learned that, concerning the Golf Course
Drive/Wilfred Avenue project, Cal Trans has not been able
to include, in their Environmental Impact Report, anything
related to the casino because it's not in anybody's general
plan and there's really no description of the casino project or
an environmental document for the casino project.
There are over 200 condos and homes plus apartments that
either back up to or face Golf Course Drive.
For us the environmental impact would be huge.
Golf Course Drive is a tree -lined neighborhood avenue and
I believe it should remain that way.
~With regard to the financing of this Golf Course
Drive/wilfred Avenue project another city council member
reminds us that this project has already been funded by Cal
Trans.
—If the city moves forward without Cal Trans funding, our
city will forfeit the 40 million dollars ear marked by the state
for this project.
—The financing of this project, by the city, would involve
using over 6 million dollars from the General Fund and
eventually attaching fees and assessments to the water and
sewer charges paid for by the residents (also referred to as
`existing users').
The residents or `existing users', through various taxes,
have. already paid for this interchange.
I respectfully request:
1) That all designs regarding the Golf Course
Drive/Wilfred Avenue project discussed and/or shown
to any council members be presented to the public and
considered.
2) That a public hearing be held regarding these
interchange designs.
3) That all residents either backing up to or facing Golf
Course Drive be notified in writing of any hearings on
this interchange design
4) That the schedule for this project be in accordance
with the Cal Trans calendar and funded by Cal Trans
monies already earmarked for this project.
5) That a full public hearing take place with regard to
funding the Golf Course Drive/Wilfred Avenue
Project if the 40 million dollars allocated by Cal trans
is forfeited.
6) That the Cal Trans Environmental Impact Report on
the Golf Course/Wilfred Avenue project include a
description of the casino project and an environmental
document for the casino project.
7) That the Rohnert Park General Plan include a
description of the casino project and an environmental
document for the casino project particularly as it
relates to the Golf Course Drive/Wilfred interchange
project.
-The Cal Trans delay, with regard to this project, allows us
to take a deliberate, measured look at the various designs and
how they would affect the residents of our community.
~It also allows us to use the forty million dollars allocated to
us, in all fairness, by the state and federal governments.
Thank you,
'A4 -A -
A -T
Linda M. Long
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD U ,
Name: , �1 f -f n, '
Address:
Phone:-5-85--
TOPIC:
hone•X35--
TOPIC• ' a -n-ll kU .
Brief Summary of Comments:
r -i` h6 ,0 Fe G
Name:
Address:
,%e Reverse --.-
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
Date: T �3 o
M
TOPIC:
Brief Summary of Co ents:
9 y9sy
See Reverse ->
Date: -7 -
Name: SF.�r �'t v s S n✓r� c� 4- s
Address: A0.7
Phone:
TOPIC: S t -/6.d D iiy A (d C AA #+'-c. s
or Y
Brief Summary of Comments: w
AJC,t " wq to e. "cJ 4 P4 -,V
G/r e
See Reverse -s
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD ( J
Date:_ 7•1-f- D'jl
Name:- (24k ck w dlee
Address: 790 Ste } 96 -yo a,
Phone:
TOPIC: .
Brief Summa of Comments:
.See Reverse —).
' CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD
Date:
_'�7/t3 lolt
Name:
Address: Uy n r C
Phone: ----,j q �._ ' 2
TOPIC: e< C
4
Brief Summary of Comments:
See Reverse —�
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD)
Date:
I
Name: p YA( \p
Address: 0
TOPIC: C.QAl
Brief Stun�4 of Comments:
See Reverse
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD r
` Co
Date:
Name:. Q� e Qr-cs.
Address:( f lid y��.� U s
Phone:y—�
TOPIC:
Brief Summary of Comments:
See Reverse --).
'r fi"t •*�' .fir y�.xSza�»`' M:(# art k" � .T� r..: �.i,W 't�: 'e'4. .eLo'�.r y STe�:� t�;;�e k• +r �Y ��.. .zr �. ;� ».� E
,.4 f..x� fX„.i.?., ,k 'i� 'p+c. ,�+;. �¢ Y �' E +:e„'� (. ?r �r�` •A` -.;`t" a Cbz .Q-:��i�, �+ 'ai!r t �.i. r •.C<.
=,•. u�i,. $r. �,, x�; � '�:i�, �-'°. „i k �... �'SF' a. t '�".' ,C t 's °k 5,. �,?'+ � ; � err ,'�;r .r c:'�, ;,, ''�'j 'ey..`
_ .rRl +. . fG... 5!i'+-a-f..tS. }` � x�. ,t rr u� , .c+•.` >.•kr .ye. .' iq .�.t !' e... r., AF, ,.'�Ka. . �. 3.. -iC � +... }�.s..
`._,.yt...+,��'> �`y, 4"z 1+. 3., t,.., r.7n�?F• � ,v;: a:a q�ha r��rw.k..=-., `^ii...�' - '.._ �°':: i"atE i � ?i;!w i..��..L ''T x sa.s,.3'.,� .;+r �..ry, 'M.,,h, a �t�: �:: - e., ;�:•,:,K..; ?.
� • 3'' F . "i�:at ,+.� ap �,a� xz ,�� t�¢,� fii •''� �fiYis 't� j x"f. �rra� � 4" °• x ,-�*: -5� 6��.,.y"e..�h... •- � �i'' {t' 6,i. s� .T 7 `�s � a;
i ,. ,. � tr i-.. k µis - � .:. .�rt� � n., r`i ,ti. iir,r� >Ea. ., � t t -'+i � a,: r r sc,: 6+t�is� r J,Z•..`�::t � fi , � ,.
Y s 1 s s a «_'J` �,_ .4. l.,x.. :.x t✓+ ;;F: .s. 4.{; .� r"..;, y 3. 9,.
Presentation to the Board of Supervisors
June 22, 2004
1
.a..; ,-+�I,' i r `�� �������.:�XX 4 y jEj+' -� �k #t! '� i�.�., � c �.v'" ��,�''e � �•,.... r';.tsf� �•��i�i.'r � G r` �"s�+' �,,'}}`,�w �'� n�.. ,
c stir. �.7 !� f• `.,+Y ra7t',+ T, i' t �i1.'si. ��• rc:'.� f cs�'�I 1'. ro ; f +.#,1° �, j' ! d T, �,,�k..'S",'.i'�,r x + 2.,.
-'r�' ''i r.'��n,.3�. .g°2'�n.d }t Ys'stti�>^i ri v. J. s ��.r.� �. 1` '4.w s.,','4� .f" `i"� + (s �� ,�•�' '}('ql ;i, .�#.. �.R� �6t��i �t �.. �e{ ;.'i .l¢. �'
•.� �"s.>�.T R7„�, .4�.y+� •��� *�•'�..� .: � �xci�:y � a: d �;��� ?' y.l.�. +�-t+•+F >y`C Q •.6�� � ePt` � #a Na Vii' ...`.1 t ...Y 7;i L1
t7^r'3 y4. 1 c+ +r �.. �r'�?'i'""• ,s
_ 1 p
�/T' N�:" jfs •a.. s$f 'l���' �� �'E LJ s. e .t'�`�:sRs�'``.ttx 1..�_r. T,.�� ``I' �. i. a -.TMS,. #fi + �v .;S k` pt � q�t ���h.� ,t� � r� � i nY
iBY&,.:a-:n61�.6w�rts+4e.a4a2tirLLa—�'`��aa�+'�� "-�' iiSy_ aa -„t 3' 1 �, Mt, wyi, � r u` ,• pS�(�. S � _ 4 h.::.
.Wer --ht's
J;
�V Solid Waste System Overview
- Roles & Responsibilities
Major Issue Categories
Disposal Issues
Pa
1
40 All Jurisdictions each contracts with private
haulers for collection services
A"r County —responsible
waste disposal sites
for all county solid
:� Sonoma County Waste Management Agency
—
AB939,, County -wide waste programs
9
r�
l.Ya F.
Solid
Responsibilities
R� Collection - each jurisdiction contracts with
private haulers
ea Empire Waste Management (also Cloverdale Disposal
and Larry's Sanitary Service)
46,400 residential customers
wean North Bay Corporation (also Pacific Coast Disposal,
Rohnert Park Disposal, -Santa Rosa Recycling and
Collection, Sunrise Garbage Service, West Sonoma
County Disposal, and Windsor Refuse and Recycling)
61,000 residential customers
�- Cloverdale
'`EMPIRE WAS Waste Hauler
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT Service Territories
ARTING N"z__
Healdsburg,
�'o \ Windsor
,OR TH�B , Y _ ioi
C0' I'ORATION Sar)ta s
Sebastono_&-
'--�-Rohnert)Par
-6otati Sonoma .
Pbtaluma
ONOMA
,ARBAGE
�LLECTORS
s
-I"--M 7d0
d 1, H aste Svstem S
4
vveriew-
J<oles & Responsibilities
I&
Disposal - County operates County -wide
.disposal system
ma 1 landfill,
6� 5 transfer stations
da 7 closed landfills
31
Sonoma
County \ ��
Landfill and
Transfer Stations
CLOVERDALE
Annapolis
Transfer Station
Healdsburg
Transfer Station
HEALDSBURGI�
WINDSOR
Guerneville
1-01 Occidental LT Transfer Station SANTA'RPSA
C Trans' r Station P 1
SEBASTOPOL-..t,- 101
�? f-ROHNERT
ent I COTATI'1 PARK
7, CDisposa�I',Site
',S6NOMA
PETALUMA
1 Transfer Station N - SonomaU
.._.,l
'.. �i Municipal Landfill Station
15 20
wig
SAN
PABLO BAF
7