2014/03/13 Planning Commission ResolutionPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2014-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR UNIVERSITY DISTRICT
SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT LOCATED SOUTH OF KEISER AVENUE, WEST
OF PETALUMA HILL ROAD, AND NORTH OF COPELAND CREEK (APNs 045-
253-0077 045-253-009 THROUGH -012, 045-253-018, 045-262-001 THROUGH -004,
047-131-019, AND 047-131-024 THROUGH -027)
WHEREAS, the applicant, University District LLC, filed Planning Applications
proposing a General Plan Amendment (PL2012-043), Specific Plan revision (PL2012-044),
Tentative Map (PL2013-009), Tentative Parcel Map (PL2012-047), Development Agreement
(PL2012-048), and related applications and approval of an Addendum to the Final
Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") (PL2012-045) in connection with the proposed University
District Specific Plan ("UDSP") Project located south of Keiser Avenue, west of Petaluma Hill
Road, and north of Copeland Creek (APNs 045-253-007, 045-253-009 through -012, 045-253-
018, 045-262-001 through -004, 047-131-019, and 047-131-024 through -027 (the "Project"), in
accordance with the City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code ("RPMC"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing revisions to the University District Specific Plan
project that was approved in 2006. The current Project, as proposed, would result in no changes
to the total number of residential units (1,645 units), but would result in changes to the number
of residential units by land use designation and would change the gross acreage and
configuration for each designation in the UDSP area and reduce the total commercial building
area.
WHEREAS, for the environmental review of the 2006 project, the City of Rohnert Park,
acting as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), published
a Notice of Preparation ("NOP") of a Draft EIR for the proposed Project on December 1, 2003.
The NOP was distributed for a 30 -day comment period beginning on December 1, 2003. The
City then initiated work on a Draft EIR for the project (Project); and
WHEREAS, the City completed the Draft EIR on July 27, 2005 and circulated it to
affected public agencies and interested members of the public for the required 45 day public
comment period, from July 27, 2005 to September 15, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rohnert Park duty noticed and
conducted a public hearing on August 25, 2005 in order to receive comments on the Draft EIR;
and
WHEREAS, the City completed the Recirculated Draft EIR to update two sections of the
Draft EIR and circulated it for public review on June 24, 2009 for the required minimum of 45
days, from November 28, 2005 through January 11, 2006; and
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2006, the City published the Final EIR ("EIR") for the Project
by incorporating: 1) the Draft EIR and Recirculated Draft EIR; 2) comments received about the
Draft EIR and Recirculated Draft EIR and responses to those comments; 3) changes,
clarifications and corrections to the Draft EIR and Recirculated Draft EIR; and 4) appendices;
and
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at which
time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the EIR;
WHEREAS, to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed
revisions associated with Project relative to the EIR, the City retained ICF International to
prepare an addendum to the UDSP Final EIR pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act ("CEQA"); and
WHEREAS, the Addendum to the EIR concluded that the proposed changes in the
project would not result in a new or substantially more severe impact than disclosed in the 2006
EIR; and
WHEREAS, Section 21000, et. seq., of the Public Resources Code and Section 15000,
et. seq., of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (the "CEQA Guidelines"), which
govern the preparation, content, and processing of environmental impact reports, have been fully
implemented in the preparation of the EIR and Addendum; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California State Law and the RPMC, public hearing notices
were mailed to all property owners within an area exceeding a three hundred foot radius of the
subject property and a public hearing was published for a minimum of 10 days prior to the first
public hearing in the Community Voice; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City
of Rohnert Park ("Commission") makes the following findings, determinations and
recommendations with respect to the Addendum to the EIR for the proposed Project:
1. The Commission has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the EIR
and Addendum and all written documentation and public comments prior to
making recommendations on the proposed Project; and
2. The Addendum to the EIR was prepared and reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines; and
That the Addendum to the EIR constitutes an adequate, accurate, objective, and
complete EIR in compliance with all legal standards; and
4. The information and analysis contained in the Addendum to the EIR reflects the
City's independent judgment as to the environmental consequences of the
proposed Project; and
The documents and other materials, including without limitation staff reports,
memoranda, maps, letters and minutes of all relevant meetings, which constitute
the administrative record of proceedings upon which the Commission's resolution
is based are located at the City of Rohnert Park, City Clerk, 130 Avram Ave.,
Rohnert Park, CA 94928. The custodian of records is the City Clerk.
6. The EIR Addendum identifies that the proposed revised Project was examined
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and 15164 and the conclusion of the
analysis is that the changes in the project would have no new or substantially
more severe impact. All of the pertinent mitigation measures from the 2006 EIR
continue to apply to the Project and no new significant environmental effects
would occur and the applicant has not declined to adopt mitigation measures or
alternatives.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that
the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park ("City Council") approve the Addendum to the EIR;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that after considering the EIR and Addendum and in
conjunction with making these findings, the Planning Commission hereby finds that pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and 15164, the Project would not cause a new impact or
substantially more severe significant environmental effect than was assessed in the 2006 EIR,
thus the City, as lead agency can adopt an addendum; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Exhibit A (CEQA Addendum) provides the
analysis conducted light of the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all of the pertinent mitigation measures from the
2006 UDSP EIR continue to apply to the proposed changes to the project; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any interested person may appeal this Resolution
of the Planning Commission to the City Council within 10 calendar days of its passage pursuant
to RPMC Section 17.25.123. Any such appeal shall be in the form provided by RPMC Section
17.25.124 and with the payment of the fee established by the City.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 13th day of March, 2014 by the City of
Rohnert Park Planning CWmmission by the following vote:', N�
AYES: 0 NOES: ABSENT: V ABSTAIN: v
IJ
ADAMS B
Attest:
usan Azevedo,
BORBA GIUDICE HAYDON
Secretary
City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission
EXHIBIT A
ADDENDUM MEMO
EIR ADDENDUM
SEE EXHIBIT 1 ATTACHED TO THE STAFF REPORT
Memorandum
Date: I February 28, 2014
To: Marilyn Ponton, AICP, Planning and Building Manager
City of Rohnert Park
130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Cc; f Cathy Spence -Wells
From: I Sally Lyn Zeff, AICP, Principal
Subject: Evaluation of Need for Subsequent Environmental Documentation for
Proposed Changes to the University District Specific Plan Project
Purpose
The purpose of this memo is to provide guidance to the City of Rohnert Park regarding its decision
as to the appropriate level of subsequent CEQA documentation for the proposed revisions to the
approved University District Project (the 2014 UDSP Amendments). The University District Specific
Plan (UDSP) project was originally approved by the City in 2006. Prior to approving the UDSP, the
City prepared and certified an environmental impact report (EIR) that analyzed the impacts of the
UDSP, and adopted the required CEQA findings (SCH # 2003122014).
This memo represents the professional opinion of its preparer but is not intended to be and should
not be construed as legal advice. The City's legal counsel should always be consulted on these
matters, and we defer to their opinion in all cases.
State CEQA Guidelines and Subsequent Documents
An environmental impact report ("EIR") must be prepared if there is substantial evidence that a
project may have a significant effect on the environment. Public Resources Code Section 21166 and
the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 provide that once an EIR has been certified for a project,
no subsequent EIR is necessary unless specific conditions indicate that there would be a new or
more severe impact as a result of a later approval related to that project. This is a limitation on the
requirement to prepare a subsequent EIR and, unlike the determination of whether an original EIR
is necessary, is not subject to the "fair argument" standard. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162,
630 K Street, Suite 400 - Sacramento, CA 95814 - 916.737.3000 � 916.737.3030 fax - icfi.com
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
City of Rohnert Park — University District Specific Plan
February 28, 2014
Page 2 of 2
(a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR
shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial
evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due
to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as
complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or
negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in
the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the
project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on
the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative.
An original EIR typically analyzes the changes that would occur from the baseline of existing
conditions as a result of the project. Analysis under Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162 is different. It begins at the baseline of the prior EIR's analysis of the
project. The focus is on whether changes have occurred that are substantial enough to necessitate
revisiting some part of the prior analysis. So, even though the project may not have been built the
subsequent analysis begins from the assumption that it has been.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, where none of the conditions described in Section
15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred, if some changes or additions are
necessary the lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR. An addendum
need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR. Prior to
making a decision on the project, the City Council shall consider the addendum with the final EIR.
Methodology
ICF planning staff reviewed the completed applications for the proposed revisions to the project,
including the proposed revisions to the UDSP and the proposed revised tentative maps based on the
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
City of Rohnert Park - University District Specific Plan
February 28, 2014
Page 3 of 3
proposed 2014 amendments to the University District Specific Plan (2014 UDSP Amendments). ICF
then evaluated the proposed revisions compared to the 2006 UDSP EIR to assess the extent to which
the proposed 2014 Project revisions differ from the 2006 Project analyzed in the original 2006
UDSP EIR. Our inquiry was limited to determining whether the changes are substantial enough to
require additional environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 as
implemented through the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 or whether an Addendum pursuant
to Guidelines Section 15164 can be prepared. The following supporting studies submitted by the
applicant helped to inform this analysis:
• TJKM Draft Traffic Report Traffic Impact Study for University District LLC & Vast Oak
Properties dated December 17, 2012 and the Final Traffic Impact Study for University
District LLC & Vast Oak Properties dated January 3, 2014 (Traffic Report).
• John Olaf Nelson Report of Updated Water Supply Analysis for University District Specific
Plan dated December, 2012.
• Ted Winfield & Associates Update on CTS Status and Biological Resources in Vicinity of
Vast Oak Property and University District LLC dated December 13, 2012 (Biological
Resources Report)
• Memoranda documenting updated population, land use allocation, sewer, and parks
data regarding the proposed 2012 University District Specific Plan Amendment.
ENGEO Geotechnical Exploration Update UDLLC and Vast Oak Properties dated April 3,
2006 and revised December 12, 2012.
• ENGEO Hydrologic Evaluations Report
• AES Technical Memorandum University District Specific Plan Air Quality Analysis -
Revised January 2014
• AES Technical Memorandum University District Specific Plan Noise Analysis - Revised
January 2014
We understand from the City that the 2014 UDSP Amendments (also referred to as the "Revised
Project") are consistent with the 2006 UDSP, albeit with minor changes summarized in the attached
CEQA Addendum, and thereby the Revised Project was evaluated under both Sections 15162 and
15164 to determine whether a subsequent environmental impact report or an Addendum was the
appropriate method of environmental review. As a tool for evaluation, ICF reviewed the Revised
Project to determine if:
(1) The proposed revisions constituted substantial changes in the project which will require
major revisions to the 2006 UDSP EIR due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects;
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
City of Rohnert Park - University District Specific Plan
February 28, 2014
Page 4 of 4
(2) Substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the
2014 UDSP Amendments which will require major revisions to the 2006 UDSP EIR due to
new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the
previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have
been know when the 2006 EIR was certified indicates that the Revised Project will result in
new significant effects or substantially more severe impacts, or mitigation or alternatives
previously found to be infeasible would be feasible and/or considerably different and would
substantially reduce project impacts, but the applicant declined to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative.
ICF reviewed each of the impacts identified in the 2006 EIR and assessed whether the proposed
changes and revisions to the approved project would alter the findings presented in the 2006 EIR
for that impact based on the findings set forth above. The results of this evaluation are provided in
the attached Table ES -1, and are summarized below and further discussed in the CEQA Addendum.
In support of this analysis, ICF air quality specialists conducted a peer review of the air quality study
submitted by the applicant. ICF CEQA specialists also reviewed other submittals as summarized
below. It is ICF's opinion that none of the conditions described in Guidelines Section 15162 calling
for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. Thus an addendum to the 2006 EIR is the
appropriate level of environmental review.
Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. (W -Trans), the City's traffic consultant, conducted a
peer review of the Traffic Impact Study for University District LLC & Vast Oak Properties, TJKM
Transportation Consultants, December 2012.
The City of Rohnert Park engineering department prepared a technical memo: University District
Specific Plan - Compliance with 2006 Water Supply Analysis, September 20, 2013 to supplement the
water supply analysis prepared by the applicant.
Analysis
University District Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report
(2006)
The UDSP establishes land use planning and regulatory requirements for a 300 -acre area. The EIR
for the UDSP considered the following project (Table 2-1), which was slightly different than the
project that was approved.
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
City of Rohnert Park — University District Specific Plan
February 28, 2014
Page 5 of 5
Table 2-1. University District Specific Plan Development Proposal
Specific Plan
Development
Properties
Estate
Low
University District Specific Plan
Estimated Dwelling Units
Total
Med High Mixed 2nd w/ 2nd
Total
w/o
2nd
Comm.
Sq. Ft.
UD LLC Units
0
0
110
154 0
62
326
264
0
Vast Oak Units
25
240
314
476 100
64
1,219
1,155
250,000
Gee Units
0
42
0
0 0
0
42
42
0
CRPUSD Units
0
20
113
0 0
0
133
133
0
Abu-Halawa Units
0
16
0
0 0
0
16
16
0
Total Specific Plan
25
318
537
630 100
126
1,736
1,610
250,000
.- ®I .......... -
Source: University District Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report 2006
- -
-
The 2006 EIR evaluated the impacts of project related to aesthetics, agricultural resources, land use
and planning, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and
hazardous materials, noise, population and housing, public services, transportation/traffic, utilities
and service systems, and water resources. The 2006 EIR identified environmental impacts and
recommended mitigation measures to address the environmental impacts associated with the UDSP,
These impacts and mitigation measures are summarized in Table ES -1.
2014 UDSP Amendments and Proposed Revisions
The proposed 2014 UDSP Amendments and revisions to the project would reconfigure the location
of various land uses included in the UDSP, change the mix of residential densities, and reduce the
amount of office and retail commercial development as shown in the 2014 UDSP Land Use Plan. The
result would be the following land uses.
• 1,645 residential units, at various densities, as shown on the table below, a reduction in total
housing units from the approved project and the project evaluated in the EIR, and an overall
reduction in density, as the proposed changes include increases in amounts of lower density
development and reductions in higher density development. This includes the revised
assumption that the second units assumed to be constructed under the approved Specific Plan
would be reduced from 126 to 0. Proposed changes are highlighted. Increases are highlighted
in green and reductions are highlighted in yellow.
• 100,000 gross square feet of neighborhood -serving commercial development, a reduction from
the approved project and the project evaluated in the EIR.
• Open space along Petaluma Hill Road and on both sides of Hinebaugh Creek, as evaluated in the
2006 EIR and approved previously.
• Park lands, configured differently and in different locations than evaluated in the EIR and
approved previously.
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
City of Rohnert Park — University District Specific Plan
February 28, 2014
Page 6 of 6
• Changes in the site plan design, including changes in the circulation plan, which would have
multiple interior roads, with six access points on Rohnert Park Expressway and multiple access
points on Keiser Avenue.
University District Specific Plan Revised Development Proposal
Specific Plan
Development
Properties
University District Specific Plan
Estimated Dwelling Units
Estate Low Med High Mixed 2nd
Total
Total w/o Comm.
w/ 2nd 2nd Sq. Ft.
UD LLC Units
0
0
20
0
0
1)
203
203
0
Vast Oak Units
2.ita
®
®
218
0
im
j,2s,"I#
100,000
Gee Units
0
42
0
0
0
0
42
42
0
CRPUSD Units
0
20
113
0
0
0
133
133
0
Linden (Abu-
0
16
0
0
0
0
16
16
0
Halawa) Units
Total Specific Plan
2184
0
1,645
1.00,Ooo
Source: UDSP Specific Plan Amendment" submitted by the applicant
to the
City of Rohnert Park dated January
6, 2014
Technical Studies
The following technical studies were prepared to assess the impacts of the proposed changes in the
proposed project:
• Air Quality
• Noise
• Traffic
• Compliance with 2006 Water Supply Analysis
The evaluation and peer review performed by City, including by its consultants ICF and W -Trans,
resulted in the identification of several areas where the studies submitted by the applicant did not
provide a basis for determining whether the project as proposed to be changed would result in any
significant effects disclosed in the 2006 EIR being substantially more severe than presented in the
previous EIR. Additional studies were performed that addressed these issues, and the revised
studies are now considered be adequate for the City's use in making a determination.
No Substantial Changes in the Project
The 2006 UDSP EIR was prepared under the direction of the City and certified in accordance with
the requirements of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The EIR examined the potential environmental
effects of the University District Specific Plan. The purpose of the Specific Plan was to provide a
greater level of detail than what was provided in the City of Rohnert Park General Plan in order to
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
City of Rohnert Park— University District Specific Plan
February 28, 2014
Page 7 of 7
guide the development of a mixed-use pedestrian -oriented community within the University District
(2006 UDSP Draft EIR, page ES -1). The development was designed to provide diverse residential
opportunities and a commercial center to accommodate the needs of the residents of existing and
new neighborhoods, the Sonoma State University population, and patrons of the City's Community
Center and the Green Music Center. The Revised Project includes:
• Shift the location of the commercial center/mixed use designated property to the east to
align with the Green Music Center, and replace the medium density residential uses with
commercial center/mixed use.
• Realign public parks and landscape areas to create a continuous north -south landscaped and
park corridor consistent with the Rohnert Park General Plan.
• Reconfigure the estate residential property at Vast Oak North and replace medium density
residential uses with estate residential and low density residential.
• Reduce the total acreage and shift the location of land designated high density residential to
the north, along Keiser Avenue and adjacent to the western boundary of Oak Grove Park, in
an area previously designated low density and medium density residential.
• In the area north of Hinebaugh Creek and southwest of Oak Grove Park, replace low density
residential with medium density residential.
• In the area west of Twin Creeks Park between Hinebaugh Creek and Rohnert Park
Expressway, replace high density residential and commercial/mixed use designated
property with medium density residential.
• In the area east of Twin Creeks Park between Hinebaugh Creek and Rohnert Park
Expressway, replace a portion of property designated medium density residential and high
density residential with low density residential.
• In the area south of Rohnert Park Expressway, change land use designation to
public/institutional/medium density residential.
• Designate Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District land as public/institutional and
medium density residential.
• Designate Gee and Linden property as low density residential.
• Increase the size of the Vast Oak West water quality basin.
• Eliminate the "notch" park and UDLLC park, increase the size of the Twin Creeks park, and
provide landscaped areas in UD LLC that promotes the north -south linear park.
• Eliminate the private promenade parks in Vast Oak phases 2, 4 and 5 and introduce the east -
west minor street with bike lanes.
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
City of Rohnert Park — University District Specific Plan
February 28, 2014
Page 8 of 8
Although the 2014 UDSP Amendment would result in a reduction in the amount of development
contemplated within the plan area, the objectives of the 2006 UDSP have not changed and still guide
the 2014 UDSP Amendments. The current proposal is substantially the same project as that
assumed and analyzed in the 2006 EIR for the following reasons
• All development impacts would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the
2006 EIR.
• Although the locations of various land uses would shift within the development area, the 2014
UDSP Amendments include the same land use types as those proposed in the 2006 UDSP.
• The Revised Project would include a similar, slightly reduced level of development.
No Substantial Changes in Circumstances
Project Site
As described in the 2006 UDSP EIR, the UDSP project site was farmed continuously for many years
before the City approved the UDSP in 2006. Following approval of the UDSP, some changes to the
project site were made as part of implementation of the approved project.
In 2010, a majority of the 226.58 acre Vast Oak Properties site was sheet graded and disturbed,
including VO North, VO East and VO Central. The wetlands within the areas were filled pursuant to
the 404 Permit issued the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE).
In 2006, the UDSP developers created the wetland mitigation consisting of constructed vernal pools
and associated seasonal wetland habitat on the Anderson 48 property to the east of Petaluma Hill
Road (Ted Winfield & Associates, Update on CTS Status and Biological Resources in Vicinity of Vast
Oak Property and the University District LLC dated December 21, 2012, page 2). In 2007, the UDSP
developers established wetland mitigation for the Vast Oak Properties, located in the Scenic
Corridor areas of Vast Oak East and Vast Oak North. Also in 2007, a temporary bridge was installed
across Hinebaugh Creek in the Vast Oak Properties area to allow construction and farm equipment
to cross the creek. The bridge has since been removed (Winfield Biological Resources Report, page
2). No other modifications to the project site have been made.
Project Site Vicinity
Some of the development projects identified in the 2006 EIR as occurring in the future cumulative
condition have since been developed. Specifically, construction of the Green Music Center was
completed in early 2013, and the Graton Rancheria completed the Graton Resort and Casino in
November 2013. Both facilities are operational. The 2006 EIR took into consideration the
cumulative environmental impacts associated with these development projects. The technical
studies prepared for the 2014 CEQA Addendum take into consideration the updated condition in
which the 2014 UDSP Amendments will be undertaken. As a part of the review and assessment
performed for the Addendum, it was determined that no substantial development has occurred in
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
City of Rohnert Park — University District Specific Plan
February 28, 2014
Page 9of9
the area that was not identified as foreseeable in the 2006 EIR as a part of cumulative impact
analysis.
Based on the analysis conducted in the CEQA Addendum, there are no substantial changes in
circumstances in which the 2014 UDSP Amendments will be implemented that would result in new
significant environmental effects or in a substantial increase in the severity of the previously
identified impacts.
No New Information
Following the publication of the 2006 EIR and related project approvals, several changes to the
regulatory background relative to air quality and climate change, biological resources, and
hydrology occurred. These changes are discussed in detail in the technical studies attached to the
Addendum and summarized below.
Based on the technical studies completed for the 2014 UDSP Amendments, no new information of
substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known when the 2006 EIR
was certified indicates that the 2014 Revised Project will result in new significant effects or
substantially more severe impacts. Moreover, there are no mitigation measures or alternatives
previously found to be infeasible which are now found to be feasible and/or considerably different
that would substantially reduce project impacts.
Air Quality and GHG/Climate Change Regulatory Background and Air Quality
Changes
The CEQA Addendum and the AES Air Quality Report identify the following new information since
the 2006 EIR was certified:
• The BAAQMD updated its CEQA Guidelines in June 2010 and May 2011. Subsequently,
the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines were challenged and upheld in Court.
• The National and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS and CAAQS) were
updated since the approval of the 2006 EIR.
• Updated monitoring data was available from monitoring stations throughout Sonoma
County, the SFBAAB, and the State of California for 2009, 2010, and 2011.
• The 2011 BAAQMD Guidelines provide methodologies for evaluating impacts due to
TACs and PM 2.5 emissions.
• Due to changes in federal, state and local laws since 2006, EIRs now include an
evaluation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change as further discussed
on pages 5-10 of the Air Quality Report. On December 30, 2009, the Natural Resources
Agency adopted CEQA Guidelines amendments for the quantification and mitigation of
GHG emissions.
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
City of Rohnert Park — University District Specific Plan
February 28, 2014
Page 10 of 10
As stated in the CEQA Addendum and the accompanying Air Quality Reports, these changes in
applicable regulations and new information related to monitoring data did not result in the
identification of new significant air quality impacts or in a substantial increase in the severity of the
previously identified impacts. The studies performed in support of the Addendum assessed the
impacts of the project with the changes in regulation and air quality and provide evidence that with
these changes and the proposed revisions to the project, impacts would not be greater than those
identified in the 2006 EIR, and no new impacts would occur. GHG/Climate change was not
addressed in the 2006 EIR, as no standards existing for impact determinations for GHG or climate
change. An analysis of GHG emissions and climate change impacts was prepared to estimate and
analyze GHG emissions resulting from the 2014 UDSP Amendments and compare them to those that
would result from implementation of the proposed project. The study concluded that GHG
emissions would not be greater than to those that would result from implementation of the
proposed project because of the reduction in levels of development associated with the 2014
Revised Project, because of measures identified in the 2006 EIR and incorporated into the approved
project, including shade trees, recycled water, a recycling and waste reduction onsite and
accessibility to transit services, and because the proposed 2014 Revised Project includes emission
offsets.
Biological Resources Regulatory Changes
On August 18, 2009, the USFWS issued its draft rule proposing to designate critical habitat for the
California tiger salamander ("CTS"). The draft rule was based on a prior proposal to designate CTS
critical habitat in 2005 in the same area which ended in litigation. On August 31, 2011, the USFWS
published its final rule designating critical habitat in the Santa Rosa Plain for CTS. The final critical
habitat rule designates the same area as critical habitat as that proposed in 2005, with a key
exception that the Trust Lands held for the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria are excluded
from the designation. Additionally, the CDFW1 listed CTS as threatened under the State Endangered
Species Act effective August 19, 2010 (CDFW, 2010). The project site is outside the recently
designated critical habitat for the Sonoma CTS.
Since 2006, conditions at the University District property have not changed in a manner that would
result in new biological resources impacts (See the Biological Resources Report attached to the
Addendum). The update on CTS status prepared by biologist Ted Winfield and provided to the City
by the applicant provides information concerning multi-year California tiger salamander (CTS)
larval surveys conducted between 1994 and 2003 and five years of aquatic surveys conducted on
the project site and areas east of Petaluma Hill Road, as well as at the Anderson 48 Mitigation Site
between 2007 and 2011 and states that these studies confirm that CTS do not occur on the property
(Ted Winfield & Associates, Update on CTS Status and Biological Resources in Vicinity of Vast Oak
Property and the University District LLC dated December 21, 2012, page 3).
For these reasons, the change in the listing of the CTS does not result in identification of any new
significant impacts related to CTS.
1 As of January 1, 2013, the California Department of Fish and Game was renamed the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife.
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
City of Rohnert Park— University District Specific Plan
February 28, 2014
Page 11 of 11
Hydrology and Water Quality Regulatory Changes
Since 2006, the State has continued to adopt more stringent requirements related to water quality
controls, but there have been no changes to the regulatory background. The December 2, 2008
FEMA floodplain map for the project area has not been revised subsequent to the publication of the
UDSP EIR and the Clean Water Act 303d list for the Laguna de Santa Rosa does not contain
additional pollutants of concern. The RWQCB is continuing to develop the TMDL for the Laguna de
Santa Rosa, and expects to receive EPA approval by 2014 (NCRWQCB, 2010).
The 2006 Specific Plan provided for a detention basin in Vast Oak West. Moreover, although the
2006 UDSP EIR included provisions for detention as part of the Vast Oak and UDLLC subdivisions,
the 2014 revisions propose to increase the size of the Vast Oak West water quality basin in order to
assure that all hydrologic and storm drainage impacts are fully addressed while minimizing impacts
to water quality in a manner contemplated in the 2006 Specific Plan EIR. The UDLLC property
onsite basin mitigates the UDLLC development impacts and reduces the post -development, 10 -year
and 100 -year flow rates. The proposed onsite detention basins therefore reduce peak runoff and
capture flows, so that the project discharge would not exceed the existing stormwater system
capacity. The Vast Oak and UDLLC projects have been designed to provide for no net increase in
peak stormwater discharge relative to current conditions in accordance with the 2006 Specific Plan
and EIR.
No New Impacts
Based on our review of the proposed changes to the project and the studies submitted to the City by
the project applicant, and the peer review analyses, the 2014 Revised Project would not result in any
new significant environmental effects which were not disclosed in the 2006 EIR, nor would the
project revisions result in a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified impacts
analyzed in the 2006 UDSP EIR.
Table ES -1 and the technical studies attached to the Addendum provide evidence in support of these
conclusions, including evaluation of each impact and mitigation measure identified in the 2006 EIR
in Table ES -1, and air and GHG modeling results, a noise study, and updated traffic study, and an
evaluation of water supply.
OAK #4827-8777-3720 v1
CEQA ADDENDUM
EVALUATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE
UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SPECIFIC PLAN
PREPARED FOR:
City of Rohnert Park
130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Contact: Marilyn Ponton, AICP, Development Services Director
PREPARED BY:
ICF International
630 K Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Contact: Sally Zeff, AICP
916.737.3000
February 2014
ICF International. 2014. Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the University District Specific
Plan. CEQA Addendum. February. (ICF 00100.13.) Sacramento, CA. Prepared for the City of
Rohnert Park, CA.
Contents
Introduction....................................................................................................................................1
CEQARequirements...........................................................................................................................2
Program EIR Requirements................................................................................................... ... 2
SubsequentCEQA Review...................................................................................................................... 2
Description of the Proposed Project...................................................................................................4
University District Specific Plan as Evaluated in the Environmental Impact Report (2006) .................. 4
Proposed Revision to the University District Specific Plan.................................................................... 5
MitigationMeasures............................................................................................................................- 7
Summary of Technical Analyses........................................................................................................10
Analysis of Revised Project Relative to the University District Specific Plan Analyzed in the
SpecificPlan EIR...............................................................................................................................12
Withinthe Scope.................................................................................................................................. 12
ImpactAnalysis.................................................................................................................................... 12
Conclusion............................................................................................................................................ 31
Listof Preparers...............................................................................................................................32
ICFInternational.................................................................................... .......... 32
W-Trans................................................................................................................................................ 32
Cityof Rohnert Park............................................................................................................................. 32
Attachment 1 Impacts and Mitigation Table
Attachment 2 Technical Studies
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the a iCF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Tables
University District Specific Plan Development Proposal.......................................................................4
University District Specific Plan Revised Development Proposal 2014 ..................................................7
Figures
Figure1: 2006 Land Use Plan..............................................................................................................8
Figure2: 2014 Site Plan......................................................................................................................9
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the ii ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Introduction
The following is an addendum to the EIR prepared by the City of Rohnert Park ("City") for the
University District Specific Plan in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15164. This project was originally approved by the City in 2006 in
conjunction with approval of the University District Specific Plan ("2006 UDSP"). At the time of
the approval, the City prepared and certified an environmental impact report ("Specific Plan
EIR") that analyzed the impacts of the UDSP, and adopted the required CEQA findings.
CEQA provides that when a program EIR has been prepared for a project, the need for
additional environmental analysis of later activities consistent with the project is limited. Later
activities can include changes in the project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, it is
concluded from the following analysis that the proposed changes in the project described below
would not result in a new or more severe impact relative to the program EIR. The City will
consider this addendum, with the program EIR, when approving the project.
This addendum comprises the following sections.
• CEQA Requirements, describing the findings necessary for adoption of an addendum.
• Description of the Proposed Project.
• Table of 2006 EIR Impacts and Mitigation Measures and Analysis of Project Changes
Relative to the 2006 program EIR.
• Technical Studies
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 1 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
CEQA Requirements
Program EIR Requirements
Section 15168 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides that when a program EIR has been
certified for a project, "subsequent activities in the program must be examined in light of the
program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared."
If the agency finds, pursuant to Section 15162, that no new effects could occur and no new
mitigation measures would be required, then the activity can be approved as being within the
scope of the project covered by the program EIR and no new environmental document would
be required.
As described below, this project consists of revisions to the UDSP, in conjunction with
corresponding amendments to the Rohnert Park General Plan, subdivision approvals, design
guidelines, and an Amended and Restated Development Agreement. Subsequent CEQA review
of those revisions is being undertaken pursuant to Section 15162.
Subsequent CEQA Review
Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides that when an EIR has been certified for a
project, no subsequent EIR is required for a later activity under that project unless one or more
of the following has transpired.
Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration
due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified
as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or
negative declaration;
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in
the previous EIR;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project,
but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 2 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects
on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure
or alternative.
When a new or more severe impact is identified that can be mitigated to a less -than -significant
level, the lead agency can adopt a subsequent mitigated negative declaration. Where the activity
does not cause a new impact or substantially more severe impact, the lead agency can adopt an
addendum, per CEQA Guidelines Section 15164; see also Santa Teresa Citizens Action Group v.
City of San Jose (2003) 114 Cal.AppAth 689, 702-803). The addendum and lead agency's
findings should include a "brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR,"
and the explanation "must be supported by substantial evidence." (CEQA Guidelines, §
15164(e).) "An addendum need not be circulated for public review," but must be considered by
the lead agency prior to making a decision on the project. (Id., § 15164(c) -(d).)
Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that a CEQA lead agency may prepare an
addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of
the conditions described above for Section 15162 calling for preparation of an SEIR have
occurred. Because the EIR previously evaluated development of the University District Specific
Plan, this Addendum evaluates whether any of the conditions requiring a subsequent EIR exist,
and/or whether there are any minor clarifications or revisions to the EIR that would be needed
in order for the City of Rohnert Park to rely on the EIR. The following sections of this
Addendum document the information and analysis contained in the EIR and relevant
information that has become available since the EIR was prepared.
The proposed Revised Project described below is examined in the attached Impacts and
Mitigation Table and analysis in light of the provisions of Section 15162. All of the pertinent
mitigation measures from the 2006 program EIR continue to apply to the proposed changes to
the project. The conclusion of the analysis that follows is that the changes in the project would
have no new or substantially more severe impact. For that reason, pursuant to Section 15164,
this Addendum was prepared.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 3 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Description of the Proposed Project
University District Specific Plan as Evaluated in the
Environmental Impact Report (2006)
The 2006 UDSP establishes land use planning and regulatory requirements for development of
an approximately 297 -acre site located on each side of Hinebaugh Creek, along the eastern
boundary of Rohnert Park's City limits, south of Keiser Avenue, west of Petaluma Hill Road, and
north of Copeland Creek as shown in Figures 1 and 2 of the 2006 UDSP.
On May 23, 2006, the City of Rohnert Park adopted the March 2006 Final Environmental Impact
Report for the University District Specific Plan ("Specific Plan EIR"). The project evaluated in
the Specific Plan EIR consisted of the development of a total of 1,610 dwelling units without
secondary units (1,736 total units with secondary units), and up to 250,000 square feet of
commercial center/plaza uses (including a hotel). The City approved the 2006 University
Specific Plan for a total of 1,645 total units, 126 second units, and 175,000 gross square feet of
neighborhood serving commercial, retail, and office space ("2006 Project"). The 2006 Specific
Plan also included parks and open space. The 2006 Project also included amendments to the
Rohnert Park General Plan, prezoning and annexation, tentative maps and development area
plans for the Vast Oak and UD LLC properties, and design guidelines.
The Specific Plan EIR considered the following project (Table 2-1 of the 2006 EIR), which was
slightly different in the numbers of units.
University District Specific Plan Development Proposal
University District Specific Plan
University District Specific Plan
Specific Plan
Estimated Dwelling Units
Total
Development
Total
w/o
Comm.
Properties
Estate Low Med
High
Mixed
2nd
w/ 2nd
2nd
Sq. Ft.
UD LLC Units
0 0 110
154
0
62
326
264
0
Vast Oak Units
25 240 314
476
100
64
1,219
1,155
250,000
Gee Units
0 42 0
0
0
0
42
42
0
CRPUSD Units
0 20 113
0
0
0
133
133
0
Abu-Halawa Units
0 16 0
0
0
0
16
16
0
Total Specific Plan
25 318 537
630
100
126
1,736
1,610
250,000
Source: University District Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report 2006
CEQA Addendum
February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the
4
ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Proposed Revision to the University District Specific
Plan
The "2014 Project" or the "Revised Project" refers to the 2014 University District Specific Plan
amendments ("2014 UDSP"), any accompanying General Plan amendments, associated
subdivision approvals, design guidelines, development area plans and the Amended and
Restated University District Development Agreement.
The proposed mixed-use residential project would be developed on currently vacant parcels
within the University District Specific Plan area. Although the 2014 Project would involve
changes in dwelling unit allocation within each land use category, as well as changes in product
type and location compared to the prior 2006 University District Specific Plan, the total
development proposed would not exceed the maximum allowable development potential
approved in the 2006 UDSP and analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR, as further discussed below.
The proposed 2014 Project covers the same site as approved in the 2006 UDSP while amending
the 2006 UDSP to include the following changes illustrated on the 2014 Specific Plan
Amendment Land Use Plan. The 2006 Land Use Plan is included as Figure 1 and the 2014 Site
Plan is included as Figure 2.
■ Shift the location of the commercial center/mixed use designated property to the east to
align with the Green Music Center, and replace the medium density residential uses with
commercial center/mixed use.
■ Realign public parks and landscape areas to create a continuous north -south landscaped
and park corridor consistent with the Rohnert Park General Plan.
■ Reconfigure the estate residential property at Vast Oak North and replace medium density
residential uses with estate residential and low density residential.
■ Reduce the total acreage and shift the location of land designated high density residential to
the north, along Keiser Avenue and adjacent to the western boundary of Oak Grove Park, in
an area previously designated low density and medium density residential.
■ In the area north of Hinebaugh Creek and southwest of Oak Grove Park, replace low density
residential with medium density residential.
■ In the area west of Twin Creeks Park between Hinebaugh Creek and Rohnert Park
Expressway, replace high density residential and commercial/mixed use designated
property with medium density residential.
■ In the area east of Twin Creeks Park between Hinebaugh Creek and Rohnert Park
Expressway, replace a portion of property designated medium density residential and high
density residential with low density residential.
■ In the area south of Rohnert Park Expressway, change land use designation to
public/institutional/medium density residential.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 5 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
• Designate Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District land as public/institutional and
medium density residential.
■ Designate Gee and Linden property as low density residential.
■ Increase the size of the Vast Oak West water quality basin.
• Eliminate the "notch" park and UDLLC park, increase the size of the Twin Creeks park, and
provide landscaped areas in UD LLC that promotes the north -south linear park.
• Eliminate the private promenade parks in Vast Oak phases 2, 4 and 5 and introduce the
east -west minor street with bike lanes.
In addition to the changes in the Specific Plan land use designations, text amendments to the
2006 UDSP have been proposed to clarify that the specific details of individual development
projects would be determined through development area plans and the tentative map process.
The proposed Specific Plan amendment also includes minor revisions of an administrative
nature to update the 2006 UDSP.
The proposed revisions to the project would reconfigure the project, change the mix of
residential densities, and reduce the amount of office and retail commercial development. The
result would be the following land uses.
■ 1,645 residential units, at various densities, as shown in the table below. This is a reduction
in total number of housing units from the project evaluated in the EIR consisting of 1,736
units (includes 126 second residential units). It also represents an overall reduction in
residential density, as the proposed changes increase amounts of lower -density
development and reduce the amount of higher -density development. This includes the
revised assumption that the second residential units assumed to be constructed under the
approved Specific Plan would be reduced from 126 to 0. Proposed changes are highlighted.
Increases are highlighted in green and reductions are highlighted in yellow.
■ 100,000 gross square feet of neighborhood -serving commercial development. This is a
reduction from the approved project (175,000 square feet) and the project evaluated in the
EIR (250,000 square feet).
■ Open space along Petaluma Hill Road and on both sides of Hinebaugh Creek. This remains
as evaluated in the 2006 EIR and approved previously.
■ Park lands, configured differently than evaluated in the EIR and approved previously.
■ Changes in the site plan design, including changes in the circulation plan, which would have
multiple interior roads, with six access points on Rohnert Park Expressway and multiple
access points on Keiser Avenue.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 6 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
University District Specific Plan Revised Development Proposal 2014
Specific Plan
Development
Properties
University District Specific Plan
Estimated Dwelling Units
Estate Low Med High Mixed 2nd
Total
Total w/o Comm.
w/ 2nd 2nd Sq. Ft.
UD LLC Units
0
0
0
0
0
0
203
203
0
Vast Oak Units
t,6
4Q4
V58
218
X156
0
R$1
1,25
100,000
Gee Units
0
42
0
0
0
0
42
42
0
CRPUSD Units
0
20
113
0
0
0
133
133
0
Linden (Abu-Halawa)
0
16
0
0
0
0
16
16
0
Units
Total Specific Plan
?S
382
869
218
0
1,645
100,000
Source: UDSP Specific Plan Amendment submitted by the applicant to the City of Rohnert Park, dated January
6, 2014
Mitigation Measures
The Specific Plan EIR establishes a number of mitigation measures that apply to activities
within the 2006 UDSP area. These measures were adopted with approval of the 2006 UDSP. As
described in the attached Impacts and Mitigation Table, pertinent mitigation measures would
continue to be applied to the 2014 Project to ensure that the Specific Plan EIR's conclusions
regarding the significance of anticipated environmental impacts remain valid. No additional
mitigation measures are necessary or proposed for the 2014 Project because there are no new
significant or substantially more severe impacts resulting from the proposed changes in the
project, changes in circumstances, or new information as further discussed below.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 7 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Figure 1
2006 Land Use Plan
LAND USE PLAN
UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SPECIFIC PLAN
ROHNERT PARK, CA
r9
U.
LIS(II{Nh
ESGIE DENSNY COUNENCK/MiKEO-USE
LOW DENSITY OVEN SI'ACE/WEIL MDS/UMW
MEDIUM OrNSDY I'MN/DEC WAS
MEDIUM DENSOY-ALLEY LJ INIAOS
flat DENSITY
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 8 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
a -
LEGEND
Q ESTATE SFD-2a LOTS
Q Law- W x W aF[;6aa Lora
0 LOW- W X 80' 8FQ104 LOTS
°; LOW - W x87 8Fa114 LOTS
MEDIUM -4S x 90im 8FD = Lars
MEDIUM -49 x T4' 8FD-179 LOTS
Q PNW01UM DENaRYam-101 LOTE
Pu uvANST1 xncNAL4waN
Q MEDIUM - MOTOR COURT 8FO
LOTS -118 LOTS
M]HIaH-MULTWAMILY
APARTMENTS -218 UNITS
[of MDaM6USE 490 LOTS
Q OPEN SPACE
PUBLIC PARKS
I I I I I D
7"
L T
i
=MMUM urtov.r �urtiewe:rcrio
�mni�
Figure 2
2014 Site Plan
0
VAST OAK
SITE FLM
UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SPECIFIC PLAN
ROHNERT PARK CALIFORNIA
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 9 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Summary of Technical Analyses
The project applicant, Brookfield Homes, retained various consultants to review the proposed
project and prepare technical analyses in order to compare the proposed 2014 Project to the
2006 Project and determine if the changes would result in any new significant impacts or in a
substantial increase in the severity of the impacts evaluated in the prior Specific Plan EIR. The
City of Rohnert Park Development Services Department undertook a review of these technical
studies and retained consultants to conduct peer review analyses of the technical reports. The
purpose of the technical analyses was to determine whether the changes are substantial enough
to require additional environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166
as implemented through the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 or whether an Addendum
pursuant to Guidelines Section 15164 could be prepared. The technical studies are on file with
the City of Rohnert Park Development Services Department, and some are attached to this
Addendum as noted below, and are incorporated by reference. The City retained ICF to conduct
a peer review and analysis of the following technical studies prepared and/or reviewed for this
Addendum:
■ TJKM Draft Traffic Report Traffic Impact Study for University District LLC & Vast Oak
Properties dated December 17, 2012 and the Final Traffic Impact Study for University
District LLC & Vast Oak Properties dated January 3, 2014 (Traffic Report).
■ John Olaf Nelson Report of Updated Water Supply Analysis for University District Specific
Plan dated December, 2012.
■ Mark Lander, Engineering Consultant University District Specific Plan Compliance with
2006 Water Supply Analysis (Water Supply Analysis)
■ Ted Winfield & Associates Update on CTS Status and Biological Resources in Vicinity of Vast
Oak Property and University District LLC dated December 13, 2012 (Biological Resources
Report)
■ January 2014 Tables documenting updated population, land use allocation, sewer, and
parks data regarding the proposed 2014 University District Specific Plan Amendments.
■ ENGEO Geotechnical Exploration Update UDLLC and Vast Oak Properties dated April 3,
2006 and revised December 12, 2012 (Geotech Report - on file at City Development Services
Department).
■ ENGEO Hydrologic Evaluation, Vast Oak and University District LLC Properties, Rohnert
Park, California 2012 and 2013 Reports (Hydrology Reports - on file at City Development
Services Department).
■ AES Technical Memorandum University District Specific Plan Air Quality Analysis - Revised
January 2014
■ AES Technical Memorandum University District Specific Plan Noise Analysis - Revised
January 2014
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 10 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
The technical reports evaluated whether altered conditions, changes, or additions to the project
or the circumstances in which the project would be undertaken that occurred after the Specific
Plan EIR was adopted would result in new or substantially more severe impacts not disclosed in
the Specific Plan EIR, in order to confirm that the City can rely on the Specific Plan EIR for
purposes of approving the proposed 2014 Project.
The Specific Plan EIR previously evaluated development of the University District Specific Plan
at a programmatic level and evaluated development of UDLLC and Vast Oak properties at a
project level. This Addendum evaluates whether any of the conditions requiring a subsequent
EIR exist, and/or whether there are any minor clarifications or revisions to the Specific Plan EIR
that would be needed in order for the City of Rohnert Park to rely on the Specific Plan EIR.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 11 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Analysis of Revised Project Relative to the University
District Specific Plan Analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR
The attached Impacts and Mitigation Table evaluates the proposed 2014 Project in the context
of the Specific Plan EIR. This evaluation describes the findings of the Specific Plan EIR and
determines whether there is substantial evidence of a new or substantially more severe impact
not disclosed in the Specific Plan EIR. All mitigation measures identified in the Specific Plan EIR
remain in place with the 2014 Project.
Within the Scope
The project proposed in the 2014 UDSP amendments would cover the same area as the adopted
UDSP and as that evaluated in the Specific Plan EIR. As a result, the 2014 Project is essentially
the same as the project analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR certified for the UDSP in 2006. As
shown in the attached Impacts and Mitigation Table referred to as Table ES -1 and further
discussed below, the proposed changes in the project would not result in any new significant
impacts or in a substantial increase in the severity of the prior environmental impacts analyzed
in the Specific Plan EIR.
Impact Analysis
The following summarizes the findings of the Specific Plan EIR. The Specific Plan EIR evaluated
aesthetic, agricultural resources, land use and planning, air quality, biological resources,
cultural resources, geology and seismicity, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, population
and housing, public services, transportation and traffic, utilities and service systems, and water
resources. This Addendum evaluates the 2014 Project for each of these categories of
environmental impacts. The analysis is informed by the following assessment of changes in the
environment.
Project Site Location
The UDSP project area is located in Rohnert Park, which is in the southern portion of Sonoma
County, approximately 6 miles south of Santa Rosa. The Sonoma County region includes a
diverse mosaic of landforms, topography, environments and urban areas as further discussed in
Section 3.1 of the Specific Plan EIR (see DEIR, pages 3.1-3.6).
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 12 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Existing Conditions
Project Site
The UDSP project site was farmed continuously for many years before the City approved the
UDSP in 2006. Following approval of the 2006 UDSP, some changes to the project site were
made as part of implementation of the approved project.
In 2010, a majority of the 226.58 acre Vast Oak Properties site was sheet graded and disturbed,
including VO North, VO East and VO Central. The wetlands within the areas were filled
pursuant to the 404 Permit issued the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) as further
discussed in the CEQA Addendum.
In 2006, the UDSP developers created the wetland mitigation consisting of constructed vernal
pools and associated seasonal wetland habitat on the Anderson 48 property to the east of
Petaluma Hill Road (Ted Winfield & Associates, Update on CTS Status and Biological Resources
in Vicinity of Vast Oak Property and the University District LLC dated December 21, 2012, page
2). In 2007, the UDSP developers established wetland mitigation for the Vast Oak Properties,
located in the Scenic Corridor areas of Vast Oak East and Vast Oak North. Also in 2007, a
temporary bridge was installed across Hinebaugh Creek in the Vast Oak Properties area to
allow construction and farm equipment to cross the creek. The bridge has since been removed.
No other modifications to the project site have been made.
Project Site Vicinity
Some of the development projects identified in the 2006 EIR as occurring in the future
cumulative condition have since been developed. Specifically, construction of the Green Music
Center was completed in early 2013, and the Graton Rancheria completed the Graton Resort
and Casino in November 2013. Both facilities are operational. The 2006 EIR took into
consideration the cumulative environmental impacts associated with these development
projects. The technical studies prepared for the 2014 CEQA Addendum take into consideration
the updated condition in which the 2014 UDSP Amendments will be undertaken. As a part of
the review and assessment performed for the Addendum, it was determined that no substantial
development has occurred in the area that was not identified as foreseeable in the 2006 EIR as
a part of cumulative impact analysis.
Aesthetics
Specific Plan EIR Findings
As stated in the Executive Summary of the 2006 DEIR, the Specific Plan EIR concluded that
project development would result in impacts on views of and across the project site and in increase
in night-time lighting that would be reduced to a less -than -significant level by mitigation
measures identified in the EIR and by implementation through specific plan design of General
Plan policies. Scenic resources would be permanently altered as a result of changes on the
project site from its current undeveloped and agrarian visual appearance. Removal of farm
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 13 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
fences and alteration of the fields bordering Petaluma Hill Road to develop the site would alter
the overall visual quality of the site for all viewer groups, and the impact of this change, while
reduced by the planned 400 -foot open space and visual buffer along Petaluma Hill Road and on
both sides of Hinebaugh Creek, would remain significant and unavoidable.
The Specific Plan EIR recommended that temporary visual barriers be installed between
construction zones and residences at Redwood Park Estates as mitigation as summarize in
Table ES -1. Additionally, mitigation measures were required for lighting impacts as identified
in Table ES -1.
Analysis of Revised Project
As proposed in the Revised Project, shifting the high density residential units to to the north,
along Keiser Avenue and adjacent to the western boundary of Oak Grove Park, and shifting the
mixed use/commercial center to the east as part of the 2014 Project would not result in new
significant aesthetic and visual quality impacts. Development of the 2014 Project would occur
within the same development area evaluated in the 2006 Specific Plan EIR, and the level of
development would be the same or less as the 2006 Project, as further discussed in Impacts
AES -1 through AES -6 in Revised Table ES -1. This is also true for the shifting of the location for
medium density residential units to the area below Hinebaugh Creek previously designated for
prior high density residential. As with the 2006 UDSP, although the 400 -foot open space and
visual buffer along Petaluma Hill Road and on both sides of Hinebaugh would continue to help
maintain the existing character of the plan area, it would not reduce the impact to a less -than -
significant level (see Specific Plan EIR, page 3.1-21).
Although the 2014 Project would eliminate the "notch" park and UDLLC park and the private
promenade parks identified in the 2006 UDSP, the size of the Twin Creeks Park and Oak Grove
Park would increase, and landscaped areas would be provided in the Vast Oak and UD LLC
areas as shown on the 2014 UDSP Land Use Plan. The realignment of public parks and
landscape areas would continue to provide visual buffers for adjacent land uses.
Based on the City's evaluation of the proposed 2014 Project, the proposed project would not
result in any new significant impacts nor would it result in a substantial increase in the severity
of the visual and aesthetic impacts previously identified for the 2006 UDSP. All aesthetics and
visual impacts of the 2014 Project would be the same or less than the 2006 Project, and would
be mitigated to a less -than -significant level with the incorporation of mitigation previously
identified in the Specific Plan EIR. No new aesthetic impacts or a substantial increase in the
severity of the prior visual or aesthetic impacts would occur under the 2014 Project as
summarized in Revised Table ES -1.
Agricultural Resources, Land Use and Planning
Specific Plan EIR Findings
The Specific Plan EIR concluded development of the 2006 Project would not convert prime
farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance to non-agricultural use, but
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 14 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
the project would convert farmland to urban uses. The 2006 EIR also determined that
Williamson Act contracts would need to be cancelled on the water tank site as further discussed
in Chapter 3.2 of the Specific Plan DEIR. The Specific Plan EIR concluded development of the
2006 Project would not result in impacts on an existing community, but would result in impacts
on vacant and previously farmed lands. Construction of the water tank was found not to
interfere with grazing on the water tank site. The 2006 EIR also concluded development of the
2006 Project would not conflict with adopted plans and policies for the project area, and the
2006 Project would be consistent with the General Plan. No conservation plans affecting the
site were identified in the Specific Plan EIR and none have been adopted for the site since 2006.
Analysis of Revised Project
Although the specific locations of proposed residential and commercial uses have changed
under the 2014 Project, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior
land use impacts would occur because development of the 2014 Project would occur within the
same development footprint as the 2006 Project, with slightly reduced levels of construction of
residential units and a reduction in the size of the mixed use/commercial center. Shifting the
high density residential units to an area previously designated for medium and low density
residential uses would not result in an increase in agriculture -related impacts because the
development is proposed to occur within the same area of disturbance as assumed in the 2006
EIR. This is also true for the shifting of the location for medium density residential units to the
area below Hinebaugh Creek previously designated for high density residential.
Based on the City's evaluation of the proposed 2014 Project, the proposed changes to the
project would not result in any new significant impacts nor would it result in a substantial
increase in the severity of the agricultural resources impacts previously identified for the
Specific Plan UDSP. All agricultural resources impacts resulting from the 2014 Revised Project
would be the same or less than the 2006 Project, and would be mitigated to a less -than -
significant level with the incorporation of mitigation previously identified in the Specific Plan
EIR.
The 2006 Specific Plan was organized around the "Linear Park" trail concept as a community
"spine," using the mixed use/commercial center as a focal point to connect Keiser Avenue to
Copeland Creek. The 2014 Project has altered the Linear Park concept based upon the shift of
the mixed use/commercial center to the east so that it aligns with the Green Music Center. The
2014 Land Use Plan includes a reconfigured Twin Creeks Park and bike lanes along the north -
south main road (Twin Creek Road). Similar to the 2006 Specific Plan, a passive park Oak Grove
Park (approximately 6 acres in size) is planned along Keiser Avenue. A detention basin and
open space along the western boundary of Vast Oaks West and the UD LLC property would
provide a larger open space and visual buffer between the existing development and the new
project compared to the prior 2006 Project. The 2014 Project would eliminate the "notch" park,
UDLLC park and the private promenade parks identified in the 2006 UDSP, the size of the Twin
Creeks Park and Oak Grove Park would increase, and landscaped areas would be provided in
the Vast Oak and UD LLC areas as shown on the 2014 UDSP Land Use Plan. The realignment of
public parks and landscape areas would continue to assure sufficient parks and open space to
meet Quimby Act requirements, while providing visual buffers for adjacent land uses.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 15 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Under the 2014 Project, 1,645 residential units, at various densities would be developed which
would result in a reduction in total housing units compared to the 1,610 -units and 126 second
residential units project evaluated in the Specific Plan EIR. The 2014 Project results in an
overall reduction in residential density, as the proposed changes increase amounts of lower -
density development and reduce the amount of higher -density development. The specific
locations of low, medium and high density residential units, however, have shifted as shown in
the 2014 Land Use Plan. The mixed use/commercial center has been reduced in size and
shifted further to the east under the 2014 Project in order to provide proximity to SSU and the
Green Music Center consistent with the General Plan. Although the specific locations of
residential and commercial uses have changed under the 2014 Project, no new impacts or a
substantial increase in the severity of any prior land use impacts would occur following
adoption of the 2014 Project approvals because less development will occur, and that
development will be located within the 2006 development footprint.
The findings in the Specific Plan EIR were based on existing land uses on and adjacent to the
proposed project site. As described above, land uses on the project site have changed in that
some areas have been graded and agriculture discontinued. Additionally, as described above,
development in the vicinity of the project site that was described as foreseeable in the 2006 EIR
has since been constructed.
Air Quality
With the exception of wetland restoration along the eastern site boundary described in the
Existing Conditions section of this Addendum, no development has occurred within the UDSP
boundaries, and no land uses established that would generate emissions of pollutants or GHGs,
or be sensitive receptors that did not exist at the time of preparation of the Specific Plan EIR.
Specific Plan EIR Findings
The Specific Plan EIR relied on the 1999 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
CEQA Guidelines for the analysis of the Project air quality impacts. The 2014 AES Air Quality
Report contains a summary of recent developments in regulatory conditions affecting air
quality since the time the City adopted the 2006 UDSP. These changes include the following:
■ The BAAQMD updated its CEQA Guidelines in June 2010 and May 2011. Subsequently, the
BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines were challenged and upheld in Court.
■ Table 1 in the Air Quality Report shows the updated National and California Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS and CAAQS). Since the approval of the 2006 EIR, there have
been several changes to the NAAQS and CAAQS as summarized in the AES Air Quality
Report.
■ Monitors that collect air quality data are located at monitoring stations throughout Sonoma
County, the SFBAAB, and the State of California. The Air Quality Report includes updated
monitoring data for criteria pollutants collected in 2009, 2010, and 2011.
■ The 2011 BAAQMD Guidelines provide methodologies for evaluating impacts due to TACs
and PM 2.5 emissions.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 16 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Due to changes in federal, state and local laws since 2006, EIRs now include an evaluation of
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change as further discussed on pages 5-10 of the
Air Quality Report. On December 30, 2009, the Natural Resources Agency adopted CEQA
Guidelines amendments for the quantification and mitigation of GHG emissions.
The Specific Plan EIR analyzed emissions of Criteria pollutant emissions resulting from
construction and operation of the UDSP. Criteria pollutant emissions were quantified using
URBEMIS (Urban Emissions) 2002, Version 8.7.0. With the implementation of the mitigation
measures recommended in the 1999 BAAQMD Guidelines, the Specific Plan EIR determined that
air quality impacts due to construction emissions would be less -than -significant. The Specific
Plan EIR concluded that project -related operational emissions would exceed the thresholds
contained in the 1999 BAAQMD Guidelines. While the Specific Plan EIR recommended
mitigation measures to mitigate and minimize adverse effects as identified in Table ES -1, the
Specific Plan EIR determined that emissions from the Proposed Project operations would result
in a significant and unavoidable air quality impact.
The Specific Plan EIR also provides a carbon monoxide (CO) hotspots analysis, which was
conducted using CALINE4 dispersion model as further discussed on pages 3.3-12 and 3.3-13 of
the DEIR. The Specific Plan EIR included data for CO concentrations at intersections in the
vicinity of the UDSP. No modeled intersection had a CO concentration that exceeded the
Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). Consequently, the impact was determined to be a less -
than -significant impact (see Impacts AQ -1, AQ -2, and AQ -3). The Specific Plan EIR provides an
analysis of the UDSP's potential impact to create odor nuisances (see Impact AQ -4). This impact
was determined to be less -than -significant.
The Specific Plan EIR concluded that the 2006 Project would be inconsistent with the 2000
Clean Air Plan due to the growth in vehicle mile traveled (VMT) induced by implementation of
the City of Rohnert Park General Plan and the 2006 Project. The Specific Plan EIR determined
that the inconsistency with the 2000 Clean Air Plan would result in a significant and
unavoidable impact as discussed in Impact AQ -5.
Analysis of Revised Project
While the overall development area would remain primarily unchanged, proposed UDSP
amendments would result in approximately 61 fewer dwelling units and 100,000 less square
feet of commercial space than was evaluated in the Specific Plan EIR. Table 4 in the attached
AES Air Quality Report provides a comparison of the project analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR
and the 2014 Project. The reduction of these project components would reduce project -related
vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled, as presented in the updated Traffic Study prepared for
the Revised Project.
Updated Air Quality Reports prepared by AES and ICF indicate that construction emissions
resulting from the 2014 Project would be less than the emissions modeled in the Specific Plan
EIR. Nonetheless, the UDSP would result in significant construction -related air quality impacts
as described in the Specific Plan EIR under Impact AQ -1. With the implementation of the
mitigation measures recommended in the EIR, the impacts would still be reduced to a less-than-
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 17 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
significant level as discussed on page 15 of the AES Air Quality Report and summarized in
Revised Table ES -1.
Due to the reduction in the overall number of residential dwelling units and commercial
development within the project site, the total number of vehicle trips and VMT with the 2014
Project would be less than that analyzed in the Specific Plan FEIR. Indirect emissions from
energy consumption would also be reduced. Although project -related Criteria Air Pollutant
emissions from the 2014 Project would be less than emissions estimates provided in the
Specific Plan EIR, the emissions would continue to exceed the 1999 BAAQMD Guidelines'
threshold and 2011 BAAQMD Guidelines thresholds as shown in Table 6 of the AES Air Quality
Report. Consequently, operational emissions would continue to be considered a significant and
unavoidable impact to air quality, consistent with the finding of the Specific Plan EIR.
Mitigation Measure AQ -2a identified in the 2006 EIR would continue to be implemented with
the 2014 Project as discussed in Revised Table ES -1.
The 2014 Project would reduce project -related traffic in the vicinity of the Project site when
compared to the Specific Plan EIR. Emissions would be comparable to the emissions projected
in the Specific Plan EIR and the impacts would be considered less than significant as discussed
in the AES Air Quality Report. Odor impacts would also remain less than significant because the
types of land uses would be the same and would be located in the same area as the 2006
Project.
The AES Air Quality Report also determined that construction activities occurring during the
development of the UDSP Amendment would emit TACs and PM2.5, including diesel particulate
matter (DPM) similar to the levels described in the EIR. The nearest sensitive receptors are
residences, a medical facility, and a school, which are located approximately 25 feet west of the
Proposed Project site; this is a potential temporary impact. Implementation of the mitigation
measures identified in the Specific Plan EIR would reduce fugitive PMz s emissions from earth
moving activities associated with the 2014 Project. Because construction activities would be
temporary and intermittent and would not expose any sensitive receptors to TACs for an
extended period of time, this impact is considered less -than -significant with mitigation.
Moreover, the 2014 Project includes amendments to Specific Plan policies as part of the project
that require that the developers, through contractual obligations with construction contractors,
use diesel particulate matter filters on the construction fleet, and that construction equipment
would not be permitted to idle for more than 5 minutes. With these features included in the
project, diesel particular matter emissions would be reduced by approximately 64%.
An analysis of GHG emissions and climate change impacts was prepared to estimate and analyze
GHG emissions resulting from the 2014 UDSP Amendments and compare them to those that
would result from implementation of the proposed project. The study concluded that GHG
emissions would not be greater than to those that would result from implementation of the
proposed project because of the reduction in levels of development associated with the 2014
Revised Project, because of measures identified in the 2006 EIR and incorporated into the
approved project, including shade trees, recycled water, a recycling and waste reduction onsite
and accessibility to transit services, and because the proposed 2014 Revised Project includes
emission offsets.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 18 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
The AES Air Quality Report contains an analysis of GHG emissions using URBEMIS 9.2.4 to
estimate project -related construction GHG emissions. As shown in Table 7 in that report,
estimated construction GHG emissions from the proposed project analyzed in the Specific Plan
EIR and the 2014 Project over the nine year construction period would be 638 MT per year.
The 2014 Project would be required to adhere to the 2010 Green Building Code which would
reduce GHG emissions through the reduction of VMT for materials deliveries due to the
requirement to purchase local building materials and the requirement to recycle construction
waste. Moreover, the 2006 Specific Plan Development Agreement obligates the project
applicant to implement green building practices in accordance with the City's Build -it -Green
program. Since the Green Building Code did not exist in 2006, it is assumed that the former
project's GHG emissions would not have been reduced. To assure that construction -related
GHG emissions are reduced by 26 percent, the applicant proposes as a part of the project to
voluntarily reduce construction -related GHG emissions by 166 MT per year or 26 percent below
Business as Usual (BAU) through the purchase of off -set credits included in the Project, as
further discussed on pages 24 and 25 of the AES Air Quality Report. Construction emissions
associated with the 2014 Project would not be cumulatively considerable in relation to global
climate change and would not increase compared to GHG emissions that would occur with
implementation of the proposed 2006 Specific Plan.
Based on the City's evaluation of the proposed 2014 Project, the proposed project would not
result in any new significant air quality impacts nor would it result in a substantial increase in
the severity of the air quality impacts previously identified for the 2006 Project. All air quality
impacts resulting from the 2014 Revised Project would be the same or less than the 2006
Project. No new air quality impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the air quality
impacts presented in the Specific Plan EIR would occur under the 2014 Project as summarized
in Revised Table ES -1.
Biological Resources
The Existing Conditions section of this Addendum, above, contains a description of the current
biological resources conditions on the Project Site, including information on implementation of
compensation and mitigation for wetlands impacts consistent with the requirements of relevant
permits and the Specific Plan EIR.
Specific Plan EIR Findings
The Specific Plan EIR identified impacts on biological resources including impacts or potential
impacts on wetlands, riparian habitat, including impacts on riparian vegetation along Copeland
and Hinebaugh Creeks during construction, oak woodlands, listed plants, and listed animals and
their habitats (i.e., California tiger salamander; foothill yellow -legged frogs; northwestern pond
turtles; burrowing owl; and tree-, shrub-, and ground -nesting migratory birds and raptors).
Mitigation and/or compensation described in the Specific Plan EIR were found to reduce these
impacts to a less -than -significant level.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 19 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Analysis of Revised Project
Biological Resources Regulatory Changes and Site Conditions
On August 18, 2009, the USFWS issued its draft rule proposing to designate critical habitat for
the California tiger salamander ("CTS"). The draft rule was based on a prior proposal to
designate CTS critical habitat in 2005 in the same area which ended in litigation. On August 31,
2011, the USFWS published its final rule designating critical habitat in the Santa Rosa Plain for
CTS. The final critical habitat rule designates the same area as critical habitat as that proposed
in 2005, with a key exception that the Trust Lands held for the Federated Indians of Graton
Rancheria are excluded from the designation. Additionally, the CDFW1 listed CTS as threatened
under the State Endangered Species Act effective August 19, 2010 (CDFW, 2010). The project
site is outside the recently designated critical habitat for the Sonoma CTS.
Since 2006, conditions at the University District property have not changed in a manner that
would result in new biological resources impacts (see the attached Biological Resources Report
attached to the Addendum). The update on CTS status prepared by biologist Ted Winfield and
provided to the City by the applicant provides information concerning multi-year California
tiger salamander (CTS) larval surveys conducted between 1994 and 2003 and five years of
aquatic surveys conducted on the project site and areas east of Petaluma Hill Road, as well as at
the Anderson 48 Mitigation Site between 2007 and 2011 and states that these studies confirm
that CTS do not occur on the property (Ted Winfield & Associates, Update on CTS Status and
Biological Resources in Vicinity of Vast Oak Property and the University District LLC dated
December 21, 2012, page 3).
For these reasons, the change in the listing of the CTS does not result in identification of any
new significant impacts related to CTS.
Since the Specific Plan EIR was certified, wetlands mitigation has been completed on the
Anderson 48 site and the scenic corridor on the Vast Oak East site. A riparian restoration plan
has been prepared.
Revised Project
Development of the 2014 Revised Project would occur within the same development footprint
as the 2006 Project. There are no changes to the water tank site. No new impacts or a
substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to riparian vegetation would occur as
summarized in Revised Table ES -1. This is also true with respect to potential impacts to oak
woodland habitat. The Specific Plan EIR indicated that the 2006 Project would preserve this
area as the future Oak Grove Park. Development of the 2014 Project would occur within the
same development footprint as the 2006 Project. The 2014 Project includes an expanded Oak
Grove Park adjacent to Keiser Road which would provide additional opportunities for habitat
preservation. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to
oak woodland habitat would occur.
1 As of January 1, 2013, the California Department of Fish and Game was renamed the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 20 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
As indicated in Revised Table ES -1, Impacts BIO -8 and BIO -9, and BIO -11 through BIO -14, there
is no new information indicating that habitat for any additional listed species beyond those
addressed in the Specific Plan EIR is present within the UDSP area. Moreover, because
development of the 2014 Project would occur within the same development footprint as the
2006 Project, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to
special status species would occur.
Cultural Resources
Specific Plan EIR Findings
Pages 3.5-1 through 3.5-10 of the Specific Plan EIR describe the cultural resources affecting the
property. The Specific Plan EIR concluded construction within the UDSP area would result in
potential adverse impacts to a late period archaeological site (Impact C-1), three other known
prehistoric archaeological sites (Impact C-2), and several historic resources (Impact C-3).
Analysis of Revised Project
There is no new information identifying the presence of any additional cultural resources
within the UDSP area. Because development of the 2014 Project would occur within the same
development footprint as the 2006 Project, the impacts to cultural resources resulting from the
2014 Project would be the same as the impacts associated with the 2006 Project as further
identified in Impacts C-1 through C-5. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity
of the prior cultural resources impacts would occur.
Geology and Soils
Specific Plan EIR Findings
The UDSP Project area is situated on a broad alluvial plan that slopes gently towards the west as
described in Chapter 3.6 of the Specific Plan EIR. The regional geologic map of the project area
indicates that the UDSP site is underlain by Holocene alluvium, consisting of unconsolidated
gravel, sand, silt and clay loam (Miller 1972). Section 3.6 of the Specific Plan EIR provides a
summary of the geologic conditions affecting the UDSP site.
The project site is located within the San Francisco Bay Area, which is a seismically active area.
Although there are no known faults located within the project site, numerous active and
potentially active faults are located in the general project vicinity (UDSP DEIR at p. 3.6-3).
Geologic impacts analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR were determined to be less than significant
in the case of surface fault rupture (Impact GEO-1, DEIR Section 3.6, Page 3.6-5) or potentially
significant in cases where conditions could expose people or structures to adverse effects from
seismic ground shaking during seismic activities (Impact GEO-2, DEIR Section 3.6, pages 3.6-6)
or to geological hazards associated with the offsite water tank (Impact GEO-5, DEIR Section 3.6,
pages 3.6-7). The Specific Plan EIR also determined that the Project would not be expected to
result in impacts due to liquefaction (Impact GEC -3,1) EIR Section 3.6, pages 3.6-6) or landslides
and other slope failures (DEIR, Section 3.6, page 3.6-6). Construction -related soil erosion and
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 21 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
sedimentation related -impacts would be less than significant (DEIR, Section 3.6, page 3.6-6).
Potentially significant and significant impacts, however, could result from ground settlement
and expansive soils as described on pages 3.6-7 and 3.6-8 of the Specific Plan EIR. All of these
impacts would be mitigated to a less -than -significant level as summarized in Table ES -1.
Analysis of Revised Project
The ENGEO Geotechnical Exploration Update Prepared for the UD LLC and Vast Oak Properties
dated December 21, 2012 confirmed that geotechnical conditions have not changed since the
2006 EIR was prepared.
In reviewing the proposed Revised Project, the City confirmed that no changes to the regulatory
background or existing conditions relative to geologic conditions on the UDSP Project site have
occurred that would trigger the need for subsequent environmental review of the UDSP Project
based on the analysis contained in the ENGEO Geotechnical Exploration Update.
The Revised Project does not include any operational activities that would create new
environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any additional
geologic or geotechnical impacts when compared to the impacts analyzed in the Specific Plan
EIR because all improvements would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in
the Specific Plan EIR.
The construction methods and activities of the 2014 Project are consistent with those
construction methods and activities described in the Specific Plan EIR, and, therefore, the
proposed 2014 Project would not result in any new significant impacts or more severe impacts
than those analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR. Impacts to soils/geology and seismicity
determined to be potentially significant in Section 3.6 of the Specific Plan EIR would remain
potentially significant due to the 2014 Project, as a result of the possibility of seismic activities
and existing soil characteristics of the project area. These potentially significant impacts would
be reduced to a less -than -significant level based on the incorporation of the mitigation
measures identified in the Specific Plan EIR, including the recommendations contained in the
Geotechnical Exploration Update, and listed in Mitigation Measures GEO-2a, GEO-5a, and GEO-
7a in Table ES -1.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Specific Plan EIR Findings
Two prior Phase 1 environmental site assessments were performed in the UDSP project area as
described on Pages 3.7-1 and 3.7-2 of the 2006 DEIR. No hazardous materials sites were
identified within the UDSP area at that time.
The Specific Plan EIR indicated that it the project would result in less -than -significant
hazardous materials related impacts due to accident conditions or release of hazardous
materials, or in potentially significant impacts that would be mitigated to a less than significant
level as summarized for Impacts HAZ-1 through HAZ-6 in the Revised Table ES -1. The Specific
Plan EIR indicated that the project would result in less -than -significant hazardous materials
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 22 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
related impacts since there are no Federal National Priority List (NPL) sites within the project
area, and remediation was completed on the one identified leaking underground storage tank
(LUST) site within 0.5 miles of the project site.
Analysis of Revised Project
No hazardous materials sites have been identified within the UDSP area since the Specific Plan
EIR.
The Revised Project does not include any operational activities that would create new
environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any new or
substantially more severe hazardous materials when compared to the impacts analyzed in the
Specific Plan EIR because all improvements would occur within the same development
footprint evaluated in the Specific Plan EIR.
The Specific Plan EIR indicated that it the project would result in less -than -significant
emergency response related impacts. As evaluated in the updated traffic reports, the Revised
Project does not include any operational activities that would create new unsafe conditions for
emergency response and access. All improvements would occur within the same development
footprint evaluated in the Specific Plan EIR. The updated traffic analysis reports confirm that
there would be no new significant emergency access impacts.
Based on the City's evaluation of the proposed 2014 Project, the proposed 2014 Project would
not result in any new significant hazards and hazardous materials impacts nor would it result in
a substantial increase in the severity of the impacts previously identified for the Specific Plan.
All hazards and hazardous materials impacts resulting from the 2014 Revised Project would be
the same or less than the 2006 Project as explained in Revised Table ES -1, and would be
mitigated to a less -than -significant level with the incorporation of mitigation previously
identified in the Specific Plan EIR. No new hazards and hazardous materials impacts or a
substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts would occur under the 2014 Project as
summarized in Revised Table ES -1.
Noise
Specific Plan EIR Findings
The 2006 EIR described noise sensitive land uses based on the existing conditions within the
UDSP area. The east side was characterized as undeveloped agricultural land. Redwood Park
Estates, Creekside Middle School, "J" Section residential development and Kisco Wellness
Center were located in the west site. Several isolated single-family residents were located on
the north side and the Green Music Center and SSU were located on the south side (see 2006
EIR, p. 3.8-2).
The Specific Plan EIR provides an extensive noise impact analysis. The analysis consisted of 15 -
minute noise measurements conducted at various sites along the perimeter of the specific plan
boundaries. Construction noise impacts were analyzed using estimated noise levels of site-
specific, heavy-duty vehicles, and construction equipment. Construction noise impacts were
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 23 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
determined to be less than significant with mitigation. Project -related traffic noise impacts were
determined using the Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Prediction Model, which
utilized the traffic volumes provided in the 2005 TIS (W -Trans, 2005) and measured ambient
noise levels. Near-term traffic noise impacts were determined to be less than significant with
mitigation. The Specific Plan EIR found that noise impacts on existing residential uses and new
residential units constructed as a part of the project adjacent to Rohnert Park Expressway and
Snyder Lane will require construction of noise barriers or additional setbacks along Rohnert
Park Expressway to reduce impacts to a less than -significant level and that traffic generated by
the project would contribute to cumulative noise impacts that cannot be reduced to a less -than -
significant level by available measures, and would be significant and unavoidable.
Analysis of Revised Project
With the exception of wetland restoration along the eastern site boundary described in the
Existing Conditions section of this Addendum, no development has occurred within the UDSP
boundaries, and no land uses established that would generate noise, or be sensitive receptors
that did not exist at the time of preparation of the Specific Plan EIR, as indicated in the attached
AES Noise Report. Ambient noise levels in 2013 were also found to resemble the noise levels
reported in the 2006 EIR as summarized in the AES Noise Report. No changes in circumstances
or new information indicate that noise conditions have changed.
While the overall development area and types of land uses would remain unchanged under the
2014 Revised Project, proposed amendments to the UDSP would result in approximately 91
fewer dwelling units and 150,000 less square feet of commercial space than was evaluated in
the Specific Plan EIR. Table 1 in the AES Noise Report provides a comparison of the project
analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR and the proposed UDSP Amendment. Figure 1 illustrates the
proposed land use designations evaluated in the Specific Plan EIR and Figure 2 illustrates
proposed amendments to the land uses designations evaluated in the AES report. As the figures
demonstrate, the configuration of commercial and residential land uses within the specific plan
boundaries has been modified. Proposed commercial land use designations originally bordering
Rohnert Park Expressway have been moved to the eastern portion of the Proposed Project site
directly north of the existing Green Music Center (an indoor music and art event venue).
Regarding construction noise impacts, the 2014 Project components are similar to the 2006
Project components analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR; therefore, construction activities and
equipment analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR would also be the same. The Specific Plan EIR
determined that construction of the Proposed Project would result in a less -than -significant
impact with the implementation of Mitigation Measures N -1a, N -1b, and N -1c. With the
implementation of mitigation measures N -1a, N -1b, and N -1c identified in the Specific Plan EIR,
construction of the 2014 project would result in a less -than -significant short-term noise impact
as summarized in Revised Table ES -1. Similarly, the Specific Plan FEIR analyzed the impact of
vibration noise on sensitive noise receptors in the vicinity of the project site and determined
that project construction would result in a less -than -significant impact. As discussed above,
sensitive noise receptors in the vicinity of the UDSP site are the same as those identified in the
Specific Plan EIR and the 2014 Project construction activities would be the same as and occur at
the same distance from sensitive noise receptors as those analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR;
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 24 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
therefore, impacts relating to vibration noise from the construction of the 2014 Project would
continue to be less than significant.
The attached updated Noise Study reported that based on the revised Traffic Study, traffic noise
would not increase as a result of the proposed changes to the project as further discussed for
Impacts N-3, N-4 and N-5 in Revised Table ES -1. Changes in the 2014 project site plan may
slightly reduce noise effects internal to the project site, as the commercial and mixed use land
uses would be located at the outside of the project site, rather than in the center of the site.
Mitigation measures would still be required. No new significant noise impacts or a substantial
increase in the severity of any prior noise impacts would occur.
Population and Housing
Specific Plan EIR Findings
The Specific Plan EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the increase in population
growth related to growth inducement, housing and displacement of populations and found that
there would be no significant impacts related to population and housing, primarily because the
project did not include the removal of any existing housing and construction workers and
workers for the job -generating uses proposed as a part of the project would be available in the
area. The Specific Plan EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the displacement of
substantial numbers of existing housing and concluded that the impacts were less than
significant. The 2006 EIR also evaluated environmental impacts due to the availability of
housing, as well as the displacement of populations in Impacts POP -1 and POP -3.
Analysis of Revised Project
Development of the 2014 Project would occur within the same development footprint as the
2006 Project, with slightly reduced levels of residential units as discussed above in the Project
Description section of the Addendum. No housing or populations would be displaced under the
2006 Project or the 2014 Project. The 2014 Project would dedicate a site for affordable
housing. No new significant population -generated impacts or a substantial increase in the
severity of any prior impacts would occur, and the 2014 Project, as was found for the Specific
Plan, would have a beneficial impact on housing.
The 2014 Project includes a reduction in the size of the commercial center from 250,000 square
feet in the Specific Plan EIR to approximately 100,000 square feet in the 2014 Project, reducing
both housing and employment associated with the project and corresponding population
generation.
Based on the City's evaluation of the proposed 2014 Project, the proposed 2014 Project would
not result in any new significant population -related impacts nor would it result in a substantial
increase in the impacts previously identified for the 2006 UDSP. All population -related impacts
resulting from the 2014 Project would be the same or less than the 2006 Project as explained in
Revised Table ES -1, and would be less than significant or beneficial. No new population -related
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 25 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts would occur under the
2014 project as summarized in Revised Table ES -1.
Public Services
Specific Plan EIR Findings
The Specific Plan EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the increase demand for public
services. Section 3.10 of the Specific Plan EIR described the existing conditions for fire, police,
schools and parks and recreation. The Specific Plan EIR found that project would result in
impacts related to increased demand for public services (i.e., water, sewer, drainage, police, fire,
and schools), and that these impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level by a
combination of the public services and utilities plans included in the University District Specific
Plan and mitigation measures identified in the Specific Plan EIR.
Analysis of Revised Project
The UDSP developers provided an assessment of the 2014 Project showing the Revised Project
population levels and resulting demands for the provision of fire, police, schools and parks and
recreation. This information was reviewed by the City and is on file with the City of Rohnert
Park Planning Department. Because the Revised Project would generate lower levels of
development overall, including fewer residential units, the Revised Project would not generate
higher levels of demand for public services. The University District Specific Plan public services
and utilities plans have been updated to support the revised 2014 Specific Plan to City
standards and would therefore address public services as found in the Specific Plan EIR.
Therefore, no new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior
police and fire impacts would occur as reported in Revised Table ES -1. Similarly, the slightly
reduced levels of residential units would reduce the student enrollment estimates for the
project. No new significant population -generated impacts or a substantial increase in the
severity of any prior school impacts would occur.
Because park and recreation demand are largely driven by population, and the Revised Project
would generate lower levels of development overall, including fewer residential units, the
Revised Project would not generate higher levels of demand for parks and recreation. The 2014
Project also includes parks, trails, recreational facilities and open space at the same or greater
level than that contemplated in the Specific Plan UDSP. Therefore, no new significant parks and
recreation -related impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior impacts would
occur with the 2014 Project.
Transportation and Traffic
Specific Plan EIR Findings
Section 3.11 of the Specific Plan DEIR evaluated transportation and traffic impacts resulting
from the 2006 UDSP based on four traffic conditions in the 2007, 2012 and 2020 horizon years.
The Specific Plan EIR concluded that project development would result in an increase in traffic in
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 26 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
the project vicinity. The Specific Plan EIR further concluded that most impacts on traffic would be
reduced to a less -than -significant level by roadway improvements identified as mitigation measures in
this EIR, but impacts on roadways and intersections outside of the City's control will remain
significant and unavoidable. Table ES -1, attached, provides specific information on traffic impacts
and mitigation measures identified in the Specific Plan EIR.
Analysis of Revised Project
There have been no changes or new information related to the intersection analysis
methodology or in the determination of significance since the 2006 EIR was certified.
Consequently, consistent with the Specific Plan EIR traffic analysis, the updated TJKM Final
Report- Traffic Impact Study for University District LLC & Vast Oak Properties in the City of
Rohnert Park, January 3, 2014 (Updated Traffic Report) evaluated the traffic conditions for four
scenarios for 13 intersections as further discussed on pages 7-9 of the Updated Traffic Report.
The Updated Traffic Report updates the existing conditions to reflect traffic conditions in 2012,
when the traffic analysis commenced. Under existing conditions, all intersections are operating
within acceptable LOS standards, with the exception of the northbound North SSU Access stop -
controlled movement at Rohnert Park Expressway, which operates at LOS E during the AM peak
hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour. The Adobe Road/Petaluma Hill Road intersection
also operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour (Updated Traffic Report, page 1). Under
existing conditions, both the U.S. 101 freeway segments evaluated in the traffic study are
operating at LOS C in the southbound direction during the PM peak hour. In the northbound
direction, the freeway segment of Rohnert Park Expressway and Santa Rosa Avenue is
operating at LOS F during the PM Peak Hour.
Although the amount of development within each land use category would change under the
2014 Project, because the total amount of development would not increase from the approved
Specific Plan, corresponding traffic volumes would not substantially increase as further
discussed in the Traffic Report. Further, shifting the location of the commercial center/mixed
use designated property to align with the Green Music Center was found to not result in
changes in circulation. Specific impacts are summarized in Revised Table ES -1, Impacts TRA -1
through TRA -22. Under 2020 Plus Project Conditions, the addition of project traffic would
result in significant impacts at the following intersections:
■ Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue (LOS F both peak hours for westbound approach with added
average delay);
■ Petaluma Hill Road/Keiser Avenue (LOS F both peak hours for eastbound approach with
added average delay);
■ Rohnert Park Expressway/Snyder Lane (LOS D to LOS E during both peak hours);
■ Rohnert Park Expressway/ North SSU Access (LOS F during both peak hours with added
average delay);
■ Rohnert Park Expressway/ Petaluma Hill Road (change from acceptable LOS C to
unacceptable LOS E during both peak hours);
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 27 ICF- 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
• E. Cotati Avenue/Old Redwood Highway (LOS D/E to LOS E/F).
• Adobe Road/Petaluma Hill Road (LOS F during both peak hours with added average delay);
• Main Street/Old Redwood Highway (LOS F during both peak hours with added average
delay.
The Traffic Report concluded that all impacts associated with the proposed project would be
consistent with the Specific Plan EIR impact conclusions, and the report did not identify any
new or substantially more severe traffic impacts as further discussed in the Updated Traffic
Report for the existing conditions, 2012 and 2020 conditions.
The Specific Plan EIR stated that "the University District Specific Plan would include an
interconnected street network that would facilitate emergency access; it does not appear to
include any design features that would adversely affect the maneuverability of emergency
vehicles." The attached updated Traffic Study reports that this impact, and the need for and
effectiveness of the mitigation measures in the Specific Plan EIR would not be changed as a
result of the proposed changes in the 2014 Project. No new significant traffic impacts or a
substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur with the changes in
the location of the specific land uses and associated roadway improvements.
The Specific Plan EIR concluded that the 2006 Project would increase congestion at SSU access.
The attached updated Traffic Study reports that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness
of the proposed mitigation measures in the Specific Plan EIR would not be changed as a result of
the proposed changes in the 2014 Project. No new significant traffic impacts or a substantial
increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur.
The Specific Plan EIR concluded that the 2006 Project would not affect alternative
transportation modes. In its review of the revised site plan, the City concluded that the
proposed revisions to the Specific Plan would not affect the provision of bus service or bike
transportation, and so the Revised Project would not result in a new impact related to
alternative transportation modes.
No new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic
impacts would occur. The proposed site plan and phasing plan changes would not change the
conclusion of the Specific Plan EIR regarding this impact.
Utilities and Service Systems
Specific Plan EIR Findings
The Specific Plan EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the increase in population
growth related to utilities and services. Section 3.12 of the Specific Plan DEIR described the
existing conditions for sewer, electricity, solid waste generation and telecommunications. The
Specific Plan EIR found that the project would have less than significant impacts for these
services.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 28 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Analysis of Revised Project
The UDSP developers provided an assessment of the 2014 Project showing the Revised Project
population levels and resulting demands for water and wastewater. This information was
reviewed by the City and is on file with the City of Rohnert Park Planning Department.
ecause the Revised Project would generate lower levels of development overall, including fewer
residential units, the Revised Project would not generate higher levels of demand for utilities
assessed by the EIR. The University District Specific Plan public services and utilities plans have
been updated to support the revised 2014 Specific Plan to City standards and would therefore
address utilities as described in the Specific Plan EIR. Therefore, no new significant growth -
generated impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior utilities and services
impacts would occur as reported for Impacts UT -1 through UT -5 in Revised Table ES -1 because
a reduced level of development would occur under the 2014 Project as compared to the 2006
Project. The updated water supply and sewer estimates prepared as part of the revisions to the
UDSP and reviewed by the City indicate that all estimates would not exceed projected rates
established in the 2006 Specific Plan EIR, and thus, no new significant or substantially more
severe impacts to utilities and services would occur as a result of these land use changes.
Water Resources
Specific Plan EIR Findings
The Specific Plan EIR evaluated drainage and hydrology impacts, water quality impacts and
impacts due to increase water demand associated with the 2006 Project and found that
increased demand for water to serve the project after development would be able to be met by
available water resources. The Specific Plan EIR further found that an increase in impervious
surfaces due to the project could result in increased runoff from the project site and increased
flows of potentially contaminated water into water bodies and groundwater in the area but that
mitigation measures proposed in the Specific Plan EIR and project design, and the proposed
detention basin in Vast Oak West, would reduce the impacts of the project related to water to a
less -than -significant level.
Analysis of Revised Project
Hydrology and Water Quality Regulatory Changes
Since 2006, the State has continued to adopt more stringent requirements related to water
quality controls, but there have been no changes to the regulatory background. The December
2, 2008 FEMA floodplain map for the project area has not been revised subsequent to the
publication of the UDSP EIR and the Clean Water Act 303d list for the Laguna de Santa Rosa
does not contain additional pollutants of concern. The RWQCB is continuing to develop the
TMDL for the Laguna de Santa Rosa, and expects to receive EPA approval by 2014 (NCRWQCB,
2010).
The 2014 Project increases the size of the Vast Oak West water quality basin to assure that all
hydrologic and storm drainage impacts are fully addressed while minimizing impacts to water
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 29 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
quality in a manner contemplated in the 2006 Specific Plan EIR. The UDLLC property onsite
basin mitigates the UDLLC development impacts and reduces the post -development, 10 -year
and 100 -year flow rates. The proposed onsite detention basins would reduce peak runoff and
capture flows, so that the project discharge would not exceed the existing stormwater system
capacity as contemplated in the Specific Plan EIR. The Vast Oak and UDLLC projects have been
designed to provide for no net increase in peak stormwater discharge relative to current
conditions in accordance with the 2006 Specific Plan and EIR as discussed in the ENGEO
Hydrology Reports. In addition to the provision of on-site detention, the Amended and Restated
Development Agreement also requires that the payment of detention basin fees. Development
of the 2014 Project would occur within the same development footprint as the 2006 project. No
new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior hydrology impacts would
occur with implementation of the 2014 Project.
Regarding the project's water supply, the Specific Plan EIR contained a Water Supply Analysis
for the UDSP based on the City's 2005 Urban Water Management Plan. Under the 2014 Project,
water demand would be projected to be lower than projected in the Specific Plan EIR due to the
reduced levels of development proposed. Development of the 2014 Project would occur within
the same development footprint as the 2006 Project, with less development proposed. Sources
of water are not proposed to be changed. The City evaluated the proposed changes to the
project against the Water Supply Assessment (memo attached) and concluded that sufficient
water supply is available for the proposed Revised Project. Based on the updated analysis, the
total water demand for the 2014 Project would be 503,886 gallons per day. Of this, 91,662
gallons per day (gpd) is recycled irrigation water which would reduce the potable water
demand to 412,224 gpd. Consistent with the 2006 Project, the 2014 Project incorporates a
number of water -conservation measures into the project which would further reduce water
demand to 303,162 gpd. The updated water supply analysis shows a projected domestic water
demand of 303,162 gpd, which is less than the 450,000 to 500,000 gpd interpolated from the
2005 Rohnert Park Urban Water Management Plan (Updated Water Supply Memorandum, page
2). Accordingly, the 2014 Project is consistent with the prior water supply analysis and no new
impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior water supply -related impacts
would occur.
Cumulative Impacts
Specific Plan EIR Findings
The Specific Plan EIR evaluated cumulative impacts associated with the 2006 Project. The
cumulative analysis in the Specific Plan EIR evaluated the cumulative effects on specific
resources, including loss of open space, aesthetic impacts, conversion of agricultural lands, air
quality, biological resources, land use impacts, noise, population -generated impacts to utilities
and services, transportation and traffic, and water resources. The cumulative impact analysis
evaluated the combined impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects in
conjunction with the 2006 Project. The EIR cumulative project list included specific plans for
the City, and development within the vicinity of the UDSP.
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 30 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
The Specific Plan EIR concluded that there could potentially be cumulative impacts from the
development of the 2006 UDSP Project site when combined with foreseeable development
projects through the year 2020. The Specific Plan EIR included appropriate measures to reduce
cumulative impacts, although significant unavoidable impacts related to loss of open space,
conversion of agricultural lands, air quality, biological resources, land use, noise and traffic
remained as summarized in Revised Table ES -1.
Analysis of Revised Project
Development of the 2014 Project would occur within the same development footprint as the
2006 Project, with slightly reduced levels of construction of residential units and a reduction in
the size of the mixed use/commercial center. In some cases, the cumulative impacts would
decrease due to the reduction in the project size and the commensurate reduction in population
and associated trip generation. For example, cumulative air quality impacts would be less than
the 2006 Project due to the reduction in trip generation. For all cumulative impacts, the 2014
Project would not have any new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior
cumulative impacts.
Conclusion
Based on the City of Rohnert Park's evaluation of the 2014 Project, there are no substantial
changes to the project, no substantial changes in circumstances, or new information for all
environmental impact categories, as examined in the attached Impacts and Mitigation Table,
that indicates that the proposed 2014 Project would result in a new or substantially more
severe impact than that disclosed in the Specific Plan EIR. The City of Rohnert Park has
determined that an addendum is the appropriate CEQA documentation in accordance with
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. An addendum need not be circulated for public review. The
decision-making body shall consider this addendum with the Specific Plan EIR before making a
decision on the 2014 Project (CEQA Guidelines sec. 15164).
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 31 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
List of Preparers
ICF International
Sally Zeff, AICP, Project Director
Shannon Hatcher, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Specialist
Terry Rivasplata, AICP, CEQA Specialist
W -Trans
Zack Matley, AICP, Transportation Planner
City of Rohnert Park
Mark Lander, P.E., Engineering Consultant
Cathy Spence -Wells, AICP, Contract City Planner
CEQA Addendum February 2014
Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the 32 ICF 00100.13
University District Specific Plan
Attachment 1
Impacts and Mitigation Table
co
LO
^d b
b
w
0
cd Cd
In
��
•�
O
O O V]
O O
0ai
�t:,N
YwQ
Yw
'd �i
.b
•� i," �/
rn
cn '
cn
co
V' O
C', N
U
C.
O Y b U
d"
aj
U
4-1
Q
U a
nq z
o
=° P,
"camx
v 0
cEg
j
i . ° P.
o
czW
co
Ln
0 0
° ani
O
Cd
� °' on
U � o � U �
U •"
o °'
as s�
N
v75
QE~wv cdr�w
a 3
Z °;
16
4
O
LQ°
ca
U
v 0 v� Y O
U.
v U
n-0
v, O
r,- U U N
L.
O
O
L
U
cn w
O VJ iUi �O C�
Cd
7.., O 7r
U , ^ � U
Z
cn
�Y�
O b
a
a�b
V
v
o o (Q
3 > o �o
' o4.
ani
'ai
4
Cl
U
N U 0N
Nai
Q
NUU�'dp
'N)
vUi NOa-
U
° �
U
-0
C/)
r° ai
c
r ami
q b
d •�
O y. U U
° y U
b Q)U
O N
ca
o
°
3
o
3
° `, � �
``" o a � �°' �
Z Inro
� � �
b
In 0
-0
O Q
O M Qi
ani ami
cd
° 4-i O .d `n 'r.U
U O0
v b cd N
t;
N Q
y
O
N p N
.?
O
U 00 .00.
.�
cd •m cd
•�
19
0
•�, tU,
cd ��t 00
�^
>�••�
cd U
O.� 3
n Q
° •j U
cOn �U
O
U
O
O
�!°
O° O v
bA U
bUq N U
O
D U
1
b
v
R. CO O
N
ca
O O
W
U N O ani U
Q -d Ca
J
o w y
U
v a°i U
Cs
_� a0i
0 o
�O
CJC
Cd Q�In
4
O
•--i
O
bjO
cn
E 0
U)
U O
y
U
N (6
Ln U bq N
H
U y
U
R1
U
U140
LU
A
Q O
W
cl�Ch
U 2 cd
O
O
cd
O U
N O
-
'
T •7. >
0
O
O
> 2U
U a;
•�
U O N 7U,
Q.
y
J
J
U
C', Rei Q
Q
Q Q V] T U U
Q Q V] u U
Q
(0
LO
0
N
(B
0-
a)
7
c
c
0
U
T
N
N
LL
T
N
LU
N
F-
0
d
cc
O
O
Cd
cC
z.
='t "d
O
N c�
ern 0 °' o
r. o •�
�4.. U
IA
p a N U cN O C'S
3 0
'b � � O O � .d y t•. �
O > > N 00
3 'U cd Y o
b
Cc
Y U cc ,-O ,, >
p o Y �,D .0 ( N
O O
'O NO � •� ,� .� � N � b N
O LOD Y O
ay Sr Y
�c o
S1 N n M O P vO U O
En
bA 'b Ri V cd y
r.
ccC N•�, cV 0051 C)
O C�
0
as
' �pami
A Q)
z Q)
t,
N
.fl
.b
O
l
ambo
ov -d b fs cts
N NS"y Y
irl .Y 'b O
C, N U
cn Q •.O. U
C�
ct3 ct co Cod
UD
CIO a a
a '� a
Cc
yV
Y Y vN•1
O 4�
�y Y
cC pp U
v o >
ob o
g
YU
w
U O
C OG
a�
on
J�
on
Ucd
obz
0 o
to 3 P.
1..; O �
cc
o o
0
. DO
In UO
U N i•,
'C
0 In
°J W)
Y YL"' •�
�"
0
�'•' •Lti
c0
o O
O b Y
W o G >
>-'
abi' 0
�p
.x.
N
N
�cd rr
20
OCV
H U 'O
O U3 •.:'
N
.fl
.b
O
l
ambo
ov -d b fs cts
N NS"y Y
irl .Y 'b O
C, N U
cn Q •.O. U
C�
ct3 ct co Cod
UD
CIO a a
a '� a
Cc
ca
Y
Cd
N N
Cd
o C7
b
YU
w
U O
C OG
a�
on
�, o0
on
Q H o -o
P. O
O
o
U Q.) oon ca
Y 110
i GA
on 0 0 U ao c�
Qc%
QJ N O
N N
Y O
o C7
b
C/) b
U O
C OG
a�
v o an
Q H o -o
P. O
LO
0
M
N
O)
cu
CL
Q)
C
C
O
U
0
N
m
7
LL
r
W
d
m
I--
10 y
v
__
N
cd Cd
0 04
a7 LTi S -d
a '�D z z
b �
U � '1..i •y L"i
.o P4
c
I'D
`o°
N o , ¢ o
bA 0
O f b
N N�••." N '� Cd
p O c',
>N N a O
UA-(oa0°
to b U�+U O O v
5 +�' A.
OU
0 Q 'd •� '� N "Cl •�
W U o 0
C)
0 o
°'� °�'
'd C,4
H 3 3 a C,3 . .
LdCd C13
� .. ..
zz
Cd
O
O
O
z
0 �
z2
O
z�
b �
U � '1..i •y L"i
.o P4
c
I'D
`o°
N o , ¢ o
bA 0
O f b
N N�••." N '� Cd
p O c',
>N N a O
UA-(oa0°
to b U�+U O O v
5 +�' A.
OU
0 Q 'd •� '� N "Cl •�
W U o 0
C)
0 o
°'� °�'
'd C,4
H 3 3 a C,3 . .
LdCd C13
� .. ..
zz
Cd
to
z
z
0
0
o
3 w N
aoi 0U�•!
w0
A
U
w a
N cc
O Lt00
o
�"�
o
v '•"
U w d
N
U
U
Cd
G
O .r
on
C7 'x on o
3
dCL�
QaAwvo.,Q
QwQ U�D
D
0
U
r
O
N
m
7
d
LL
T
N
LU
F -
Q)
U)
aD
cr
C
M
Cd
U U'
m
U
b
C O
Cd U
N b�A
to
P ai a� O
N bA
oQy�Os
U7 cd
O
a •ti
N N
�•I V
O O O q �" s. ctUO
b
o o Q) o o
Y � 'd c)w O
• 3
r.
G'+ ate-. Q '� N cd
b N y O m A w
CQ
Gn
'Cy • ttiy" •� U N ° Gn
•/p 0 'b
'b O y 'b n cd cd
0 o O 0
OU cl .d N
f� O P3 o N
W o Y O cd
❑ � O 4-I
\O p ❑ m 'N P. s0. O
O OCd'O G' O
64
F� 3 0 ° 3 a' "° H ON
d Cd C's cd
rl
0
O bD a� bb
0-4
U
C) O �
Cl
P ai a� O
co 0
oQy�Os
o ao
; boo
° U O w •6
°
c� O N
N U .2 N
oc� o o
o 0
N cl
0 3
q3
O 0,I
O cd
cj
O
,d O
U
o w M
0
-
( 4a
OU > O V
'A O
^d C
Py
3.
ti i �l
O cd
d cd
N
o
O U N O
O
C) b O
a
H 3 o•d 3.9
c.
N N
�•I V
O O O q �" s. ctUO
b
o o Q) o o
Y � 'd c)w O
• 3
r.
G'+ ate-. Q '� N cd
b N y O m A w
CQ
Gn
'Cy • ttiy" •� U N ° Gn
•/p 0 'b
'b O y 'b n cd cd
0 o O 0
OU cl .d N
f� O P3 o N
W o Y O cd
❑ � O 4-I
\O p ❑ m 'N P. s0. O
O OCd'O G' O
64
F� 3 0 ° 3 a' "° H ON
d Cd C's cd
rl
0
O bD a� bb
0-4
U
U
U
o ao
; boo
7
°
c� O N
N U .2 N
°
C". 0
O z V
D Q' �+cn.
0 O 'AO
�
O 0,I
O O
0
p
U c H
U
0
Y
0
3.
¢w¢ �du3
d o¢
auu
b W
'S c o
Cc
P4 u c o
y_ :'C:' N bA .�'1. 4:
04UDO
NaV]•�W .� z
pO O
Cd U
110
o b10
N� z z
�
Go 0 � y U
00 • v y o
0 Cd
t4:4 A
44
cn
0� 3b ��04 bop
> O u Y ' 4:rA
`" b ani
b b en cd
o
b o a 0 Ld 3 v °' .fl
O A. "" o U > 0 V 4" N b
o cd
3 =�
o -o o o2 Cd
0 co � a o �; o o p
O W U M w 'b ' -O O ;> cd
Cd a Cl ani u° 3 0 w a" a:
W H a pv C7 . 3 C14o Z cv U IL) C13 Icni W
U) cq
b �
y U
O Cc O U
i v V
Cdu
Na�3� a•�
z
u
u
aj Cd
u U 0�
N cn
� O
O
�a
o > . o
U U z
O
eua r4 o M U
a
b �
a ct a 3 w
LO
0
a�
M
0-
0
O
Cd
bq .ti
z2.
'b
N
0 0 0 N O C; CIA
O
'++ w AJ N b 'G Q3 GJ
O U ON
L."
3Y (�oCd 0
� a
>
W
viol 3 U� C,
O cd "
O w 420
cl
ID
b U Q .+ UJ N cd N aU+ sU P O
ObA yw,0 N N �..
.b0 4
V, to U U
U •+ cd O U O oo cd
Wcd cd v' , U b N Cd
N C4 ❑V -d cd bA
O
C) 0¢' ^? id O O �+ NN rte+
cn cd
al
N bA
V
a� cd '0 w
0 N O N N
A 'ate > Q .0 N yy U
d v d S1 N i b O p
o b. v�U Q d^ O SOA q y0
3 o o
y U o Y .'44a.. U 3 O cd U
y O N > ;j >, O S1
'd Cd UO to k
� '6 N
¢, v�
cd� a U to — 0 OU N
N 'rn N 0 w N 0 .� Q N o •p^
GO U U S �,
y „ U 0 � v CIS
N 0 mU N O tU. N
b^ O CcIn o
j y
Z •� cd .� O
G
ftbi id .O
b •o >FA
o
O
0 0
U
O
N
m
7
d
LL
T -
Ch
W
d
a
v
y
b
Cd
5 a � 0
Cd cd
d
N N
b N V) cd by N cd y o U N 4) �" N' O
cd cj'°'�-doavo 0o:..'dado
a Cd o U >, � C7 o a i Y o�D W Oo o P.
cm C, to C14
Nrndw 30AUdco vs r. — & R
d UwP°d¢�wa
a cd
O b
Cd 10
O O P. p ,`� 4r .'yam. �•" �
cd
P, U U d N' O ys. O U N N N 00 PLO y
C) a b o a) ° �, oco
o P. ' ° �' ° a�
o'� °
oya;N �oobo oU`°op°
42 tH
Oc� q '� cv o .b '� a�
8 PG sU, . � U U U ° b P4 > 41 v id �� . w O Gn
Cd
-d U 0 — U)— ti d q .b N
p ?�! N p U a� O o a� p a� W O a�
�� a� > -d 4) O o U abi P,0 14
a� ani
OU'+�i p .b " 0 U U V o V cd
v N N �N U~
•S.0 C13^ O y U
a
P.m 47 U +'
qt
Cd
aON Ucd PL w N N U U) bcCb OO Pm NN U F
N
o o
cd cd '3 N N O z
(n q p
C�
o�Ob
�.I
cl
ell cn
I
d
Qy O
c�
� •b��A •+�'' � b��A b0"A
U
•�' U b b
." o �" � O
dy 0411 o c' -d cd NQ —Cd -060
cmc Q w '� b b o w '� '�
P:OP4 CV
m
0
00
a)
0)
N
0-
_0 'O
N
7
C
•c
0
U
r
O
N
lC
7
.G
d
LL
r
Ch
W
F-
a
v
y
Q
ti
c ° C;J �
Ccw cc
U U b
p Ln „� •••� I--1 bq a) bA
e4 Po
� U
O O O
�r U
•�.r+ tUi U to
o wi A � '
N z� z� z�
l LdO
cc
° O C� U p -d G 42 bn U 1U d
d3.� ° o -d ° '� o 0 0 A. on �c o ��0•. d b ami o y
O N y p N 5 "d a) U U P: W F. . c '.. A
a �" o chi ,c o Q � oN o o°
o • ap 3 U a� 3� o O
z ° .y . 0 ° `Oo P, ° U a� o °' W y �"+ b
O .CD
° ,y W O" aJ O O U " ' •�, N ° 'b a) ¢, '� �' vU, o
o cd Q)
N `n U ¢, O y' cV .a: U N O O cd U P. ..+ �' O O U
o d o 00•-• �. u a� b oF"�o 3 0o ° 4 0
U°'� b dcl,
3 t�t��, a Y a�0i ani o ° d> aa)icn y
O
Q ami o o ° ° o �° 'o 34. z cd C,3
cd
C) m ani �� �° ani b o P n+ o P, b b4 o Cc O y
N N ' a) 'Y a) N U O, y�yy N �" U N .� a) U N co O ,�
O NLz
N O v Z 's00 7s O P; b 1
"O u
CC O O G' C Cc
acc
U U U cao � S0
bq
u
U1-4
{"" O O O m
G •F""
.4
bA bA
F4 rn
ri o T Q v w 3 Q v� a� b O ani
a,o°,U ��D
N °n o U o ¢ oo '� U ¢ o C 0
v c> v p• U a� �',' v O uCd M CJ 0
U
l.U�Q�cn�lUO�Q�cn�P,U 3QP
LO
O
CD
m
(0
a
W
C
O
U
r
0
N
m
7
G1
LL
ch
LU
a�
l9
a
d
y
a;
a �o
a+ u c
Cd cd
Nr4
NP,V�
3W�
�l'�
r•a'�
Cid
e4
opo
byCC3Cd
° o
Y
W
b4
xQ) U
�x
b '
b
o` a
C7v a ' C7 R �
O� g Y~a 3
:� W 3 ° cd o (1) +.
.
°
Yom�j+" ° •0> 30 o�•+
•i> cC O •� a�
Yp N Cd ,
a ° w•
a) U NO
a� 3
o �
b'o
a.°
p •F
.Y oo 5 r. o- .S
b o o �4� O
Y a� �.' O
cd
0
cd
A,
o
cd - o v
v
.0 cn
0w
> 's = CdO o
'�•'- 0 b N � N
P N
•o O 0 a) O co
v� N c cd b N
y
Cc) 0 o o
q " 0 O 2 �: r
Ob C) -0 ° d 3 0
v 0 w g
Q o.� o 0.) �, o
Y
°
e
{°L b ami bb's c�
o
Y 4-i Y 0 Cd
o V o
w N P-5
ii
4 P4 93
b O O 3 '• a)6
V
::
•
y
O ' W q O
�'o o �
ON 44 ami Q� O EA 4
co
W
°w'
'� o 0
H
H .�
Irl„
N
F+�
hV
Cd O
�..� U r"' �+
t
Y
cd U
Y
Cd U
W t O bA
44
rA
a
CC
a
bA
-5ID
bA .
bD
14
b
Y
as
0 to
o ° -0 b '- (L)
,C
ani
C) cd UCj
U
tocl
Q
0.
O00
m
_LO
O
O
N
0)
M
Cl.
O
w '
bb
4�
O O
MLi G
cd Cj N
c
O — a-) U O � cn
P< n 0 N r.N cd °
^d do a�
W O N ' U N y Om 3
U W Z N U U
GO U 4J N U
o0O U �� va`Z, o °
U p
.•-�
�
O � • � P: �+ � O N s. O S3. P.
b W _
N O Q, 8
o u L. y Q) o o 3 0
cd C)
W " °' ano
V u
C) ."' .�'.t"., cd U p 0 Y b
N N b b4vUi N N cn +U+ •�
N N •�'. N N N cd a N
O
�Cd
U
N bb
a
O cd
U
14
y bA
cl
W U b
N U N S1. cOd
N .y N
+•+ W O N
0 00 cd o m � P, 3
3 'O n \,o 0 0O
p� Y ' O
o
Oo
A O
U) N U O 'b cd U
U O ^' i•. � 'b U
U -d Cd U O U V, v 0
b '� N N N O
N bA .� O -0 N
N b o N N N
o° o bcd b 3 0
U cd
04
00
O cd 'b 'b O N •.,�, �, �' N
ON P..i cd to
al
o
cl) cn I
b c/)
Cd 0 yd yd O N
x O
bn�UP•voa
cd N (. U
Q� n nUP. N �� O 04=� y
�_
w° 0
cd .°
'b
b
Cd U cl
0j)y"c 14
O
.b cd cd '� U
Ci
o��
y
O l0 N
�poo3
O, O
vim° um
WCd
�a a° a
o
N o C O
cd
N N
O
N
/
CQ Q Q Vl
Pr O P; V] P.
4�
O O
MLi G
cd Cj N
c
O — a-) U O � cn
P< n 0 N r.N cd °
^d do a�
W O N ' U N y Om 3
U W Z N U U
GO U 4J N U
o0O U �� va`Z, o °
U p
.•-�
�
O � • � P: �+ � O N s. O S3. P.
b W _
N O Q, 8
o u L. y Q) o o 3 0
cd C)
W " °' ano
V u
C) ."' .�'.t"., cd U p 0 Y b
N N b b4vUi N N cn +U+ •�
N N •�'. N N N cd a N
O
�Cd
U
N bb
a
O cd
U
14
y bA
cl
W U b
N U N S1. cOd
N .y N
+•+ W O N
0 00 cd o m � P, 3
3 'O n \,o 0 0O
p� Y ' O
o
Oo
A O
U) N U O 'b cd U
U O ^' i•. � 'b U
U -d Cd U O U V, v 0
b '� N N N O
N bA .� O -0 N
N b o N N N
o° o bcd b 3 0
U cd
04
00
O cd 'b 'b O N •.,�, �, �' N
ON P..i cd to
al
o
cl) cn I
b c/)
Cd 0 yd yd O N
x O
bn�UP•voa
cd N (. U
Q� n nUP. N �� O 04=� y
�_
(0
0
a�
0)
cD
CL
m
0
U
v
T
0
N
m
7
N
LL
Ch
LU
d
M
a
a�
h
d
Q y a� a .��
u o CdO
�wN w qtr,
a a w
to
Ntnavy
U• .U. � O
C13 U
O O b
'0 O
o aCdiO ��
N Z PQUwcn °N
i
o �w Cd a ; o 0' Y o
co
O bq ^C H w Y "I->
a>i ,�`�, Q
o M 3UPti'wo �, "d..-
0 0 ° o v Y °�° on b' 0 cd .0 3 0 0 o ani 3.
o o - � � 's`�. o 3 \o ani .� .�Cd
CID o P.0 o � � � o Y o o
N � U
O n O 'Z ¢ O
U Cl N N O f•.' �'"' > N O
U 'm 3 a� Q -� = ° = ° 4� Q)o on ao o
a a� o ., i x O Was O U o
0 �o °' g a� Cc > C
cc),
C) U W o' U �, (1) Cd o 0 o v U o ,0 0
U O O N U .�. O U p '� O 0r. U y 0
r o afli O O O p
N x U b x y ami d
En
o 0 (1)o u 4) a) -0
o o
a�V " C's as
y E= c !+
on
d
V
-- V �+ i+ cd U cC U
bA .
a� 0
U O
G U G
cOC O p x O
Q a C o U
cz o v,
W 0
> 0.1 Q b
7
C
C
O
U
v
T—
o
N
R
7
d
LL
T.:
Ch
W
_N
a
a�
.y
a�
U C�00
c0
Wcd
u" o ce O ca O O
P4 u=N 4:fA •iwGG YwP�
O � � m
en .y ou ..„ ° eq • .
w�
.60.
o O off" C7 Y
.,
•o-14
oC,3y
fYi ccl a+ b - v ° O (1)P, b U — .o P.
o q
W t: vii :y o 00
c� a� m �' v o ° 0 vcn °,
P
U o
Nva PaE-�P, POUW�P:PGv�v�p~'v� c�.�
.-. O m o d• iC �
Y �x �oN Y yyq ° ° ; a
3 d � -d a��+ d P. ° 3 C14
0 0 N � � QJ � 0 N -0 4� N ;j N ¢ n � N
° Y o p o o° o o 0 cl,
°d o y '� o •° o o ani ao . .b Y � 0,
O 7J U
U ' N c� . ` N Za; N U - cC d U y0 U P. C.' 0
0 .0
b o P. 3 �" o o p. ° °� ani °o a� U ° A • Z
0 cod -0
o b 3 0o d o o b" w v cq
�' a v ° o> a°i
v�' o �- `� cc � 0 ° o 0 v a 0 �> 0 3 `� o' o
P; b 0 s� 3 N. o � 0 3 b '°J 0 _ 3 � ° 3 a
N" 0 0 0 P: G
c W P, o o °' W o Q. � o° W ami ami o q v
cl
k C
(r=,,
cqs N O U 0 N b O� N .N+ c� ¢ ti
0 M , O U w
W E � c,'o ; v°i � E b P, �� 'v o a>i Q F ss ° °: w° .o p o
b �
Z p >
U
NP,i� On'cl
CO Cd
ciA a on
U p
� R7
�w
bA y U S~•"
N V] •�O bA
V] V]
�V cid N
N N N N W b N Y
d 0 O
v r b oc O 'r
0. O °o O 0 0 tj °' O
wQ3 aaQ3Uaa maL'o
CD
LO
O
M
m
rn
M
0-
Cd
cd
o
rn
0
M CO
c�
0 on •..
a� a� •..
W
�
b
�
C
O
U
C
yy>
�.ry
U "� cl
p
4) o �n
T
0
N
y
U
7
W
Eg m
LL
N
rn
Cd
cd
o
rn
W MO
M CO
0 on •..
a� a� •..
N W 1 p v�
N O U N U 3 L, H N 3 p' 0 o
�/ •y P• 1 N r 1 0 A;
cd Py
O O O b cV cd y0
o �4, �xU C3
aaUU-.5z aa�3Qa�DU�¢ �aQ�
Ocd [� O O
.b .d Z" ," N N >' O p �.., Off•'" ¢, Y o
0 0 p i, 'o M oq o ani p 3 v Cd 0
.
4�.
oU U' �'. o cn U b >, U A.
o o -o > g �o o0n o Y o ani
o"n o m aY b U y z o ami
py o Y > U ono 00 o O P. >
>
a UUO V w� b A
+U+ 7 p +U+ 'O p b s. cd O Y vi •' O
W +�+ NC13 (V cOd �" % O M >"' N a`�'i O O cd
Yty v cC �s 4Y C : cV �� a) o w Q.
0 cd n O aJ m .+ � b O o v� v 0 a)
b LICF, O O '� s. A o w u .Y > U a)
a7 P O O �. a) > " 4= 0 P. [� 0 L•4
HI Srf y > VJ Y Y H .blUYi
W U a� W cqj V) b U
b. d •b
O a>i V O y o '1 q °' « Vn F" O
F UAB 3 ¢•o F U �,� o �E �.o v o b caUcq
Cd
U
w
o � �
40.
b
U � zo
� o
rn o cn 0 «�
W o U A x
L:
cC
on
m
LO
0
m
co
CL
r
Ch
W
d
.Q
t0
F -
'a
a�
ti
0
b w m
a� u cV ri
c 0'-
> O C q C G
aCc Cd mw
uo o
t�N twto
bio bjD
ywal wCG 4; Pa
Nam
CO 0
b r. o° 'a 3a.) o o .b o aaj o 3 0
CO
p o °paQ a. oU appy U " °� U " o ons �' 3
w u �. o ° U o o b id ai `` m ani a� o o
u un o°° a� w O a� o a�r. o o w cc C7 on °
O y U a� o �. o o O O .y i•, O f�. ,-, ,., c� 0 a�
ca vi WUwvoP� °N muu Z mP.v�Z[��D PG P,v�m U�1 'd
ob
N N a) O C) O O •3 w O •3 L,' O Uo
ono � o `° o ou
bo
2 oa o
on a �• -d U 3 'o d O � 110' G °
to
Q Li cd O a) o rn ,D O a) o • °
o 0 o
> a' o o Cd
>30 3x��ixv
b'o
a� ° �. ° ,
Y s `� 3 ° y' R aa) o P" o r. cl N
o
•� U •� ° U 'Z' N d' p •p .�'. aJ N O b •� W °O .� •y
O Y c.,..., bO
OBJ p+'O P -i U° U O
o -d 3 .
b. 3� b a s CO a o o-ba�n a
cd
oa' Z ° U b ami ani
U
c y v y N Ua) a� N N V] U
> v� cd M
o v 0 0 o a ° Q a
W Hu;�°U > PE)�Z• H�Q•b•b 3
5 Cd c
v F""
N A4 P. '' Pr° 'm V]
u
ai
0"4 U iC U Tcd C,Q M
u U
o b1D • o � o �n �n
ev 'n
O v p O U p N O o�n bn
w�l�w a1Ga ZH w� o3Ao
LO
0
LO
a)
0)
co
a
a)
C
0
U
r
O
N
cu
7
a)
LL
T"
Ch
W
a)
fG
y
cc
W
Y � O
o a) cUa o
co
Y o
3 8)
O b •3 yy O
w 'b
C)
U
U
U cd
a)
ami o o o
N a)
cd Y O O
a0�+ O w a) 3 ON
0
Y Y
U �7� O
C,
N c, O
W y
o
t
O`5CA
y O v
cd
ON . N O 00
(' B N s•.
E� O d O -
� 3 w
.Y4 O
0
3 0 Y
O .^ O N
0
s�.Y 0.
0 N
w U O a)
O a) N
N �cz O � > 6' y O
� tea: Q'�b
y -d w U
b O O Y cc a)
j N N '
O
OU •�
W m° 0 3 a
C) It a> _
O 4• C)� U U O
CIO > cd M N
F-' Q .Y
(°
��d,
cd cqj
U U U
to
O �
>,
C'sU U U
PI
00 Pi
O bA b1J
a En cn CA
b
�
a� roct
O
b a0i
cd YC cd pq cn
O
"
N w O
A
y
> O N
v O
U
cl, � 10
0
0 O
0
U O
O O
O 'y
C,3
Y
p
>Cd
00
wQ�zHc�x
���3�
UO
U U z
fs,
,
G7 bq U
O
a) s
U o O D
a/ O N .b a)
U
w U
H U 1
O O
W O a
Y o
CD '.
o 'dm 3 o
a� •�
O
O
N U
cn .�, N
U
rn N
cd cqj
U U U
to
O �
>,
C'sU U U
PI
00 Pi
O bA b1J
a En cn CA
b
�
ca
cd YC cd pq cn
Oi
o Yv
O
a)
A
y
>
U
cl, � 10
o o
b y
00
wQ�zHc�x
���3�
0
U
T
0
N
m
d
LL
T
Ch
LL
_N
.Q
F-
'0
N
cr
m
g cd N
M cOC
°
cd M
Q a3
cd
O' cOC vl
e�,U
ca
oUwU
N O
�wU
N bA ...
p
cid '
vii �+ •�+
bb •..
•Y
y No •..
a�
0 bqn
o
cdY
Cd A N cd N
O N
O y
a� a� w p o q
° 'd ¢
Yp°•
q 'od
°o
o 0 V :3
'0 cdU p O O v
o
p O •� O
O aU+ ° ° O
O0 CJQ%
Q" , '-' N U U
'o •, a
CD
U o o v q .O
H oU p.� 4° . 3 a
o
U 5 -0 Q $,
q Lt
o f� '
x U Cd Q
ccl N U U Q. bD
U V] P4 (A
°
M M s, •- q O
O O .
o z"��
U o U w U
° o v . -, O o
Q� OP,•�b
Y �o Q.
N SG
O P.
o
U
cd O cd cd
Id
U q N N Q a+
p 0 Q. n U 0
U Q. I- _O .O U 0
N •o
W y d O cd
CD o E — cd 5
N b Ncc .0 c N
U O
°
�Q� - 0 .-
Y
U O
'p
O —
°
ca
cd
N O
U+
N
a�
o o
a�
0 bqn
o
� 4 C)
°y'
v
�
bqn
o
O N cd
O
O b °
OL,j
N
�
cdy
t. N
o cd
m
0 of U F
O
N O
0 5
p 0
�° az
a.3
ca
cd
an
bq
b
0 bqn
o
°y'
°y'
�
bqn
bin
bin
o
d
U
Q.b
cn
> O zr
a�
P,
zi
a�
o
Y
p
o
Y cd
N Q�. kr) 'C
v 0
M .b '.---1
' F N
cu
Q. U
V'1
cd
Q" 't". 5
U��M c
U¢x
LO
0
ti
N
m
a
PC:
•� a � O
�+ y E«+ N •bA
Nav�•�w�
Q
y
a3
a3 CU �
a3W
CL
Cd m
U
Inz
a �' •� N z
w
O U
O O N
N J� •.� N O .. 0 0
'x y • � a., Q � i, N
cd y cd N
g
cd " bD n
> o o 5 3 0
C,3 y0 U Q b a)
O d
0 0 0 0= UO N
m > 3 °' "
X.� to o
o Q�
U U O N O
0 a 0 3 y
w' v-�'.
O U Ati b cd UQ 'd cd
O O 0 Com". C� (la 0 cd
Ha�30n.w3�
�3
"°
o � o
u
Q PL4 CA
b
- 'C 0 'd
U �"�
3�O•�,_03n UN - d
cd O —,, y
.N, C:) O O .�
o � � p. P,
pr o 't O
H 1 0
ON U A N
Cd b a s y o
n Cd 3
bb O N 0 O cd " v
cCd N
3 y 0
O N O C"i rn U 6J y C 1p
bi O
N cd 'n Y U G O
Cd
bq U
O O"
zI
C C3 m
Ei
O O bA z
z P. '�
CL
Cd m
U
Cd
¢i
N
f". Y
p4-4
C/)w
P4.N
y U t
M 4cd
N
�W b N
Ycd
OW -o 0 y 0OW
,
'O u .
�axw
�-tP4
ax�
LO
0
b0
N
rn
c�
7
C
.c
0
U
v
0
N
m
m
LL
T"
Ch
W
^D
y
L�
r
a
a�
a�
W
C �O o
P4 Cd W
'S 4: C7 Yw
O
un b 9 N
O O
Y Q)
04
a; C—D
o _
C4 0 cd
N •� N y
U o cd W 'd
cd O 04 "D a�
�".� NO
cdNa,
:3 --cg
0 Zi
01) .C'i
'b �O — O cl U 'b
O cd A A� 0 .U. � O 0
O cd
O U b
° o' 3� o Q o cd
Hn or.0rs.0
o
Y
�3
Y
UCd
.Yi
�N W
d O
cn
OW aUi 0
C.0H
cd 't M
O p b0 N bA
z a '� a '�
Lt
Cd Cd
"d cd
y ."• .b N
•b 03
cd Y cc H
o
O at
cH cd O
4" 4•'O
a�
V
O
z
o bn
a'm
° bn
a'U
Cd 4;
i
O
O
y ."• .b N
•b 03
cd Y cc H
o
O at
cH cd O
4" 4•'O
Ln
cH cd N
W W xi id
W C
O O N
O
v� W tob
cn W bq 3
U cn .
1. Y
V i t-• Y O Y
o-d
�L Y N
�bv�
°wb�°w.°�
C7Qr aHw
C7QrxC7C)
c7rx
LO
0
rn
Q)
m
cU
a_
a�
D
c
0
U
T
O
N
L
d
LL
T
w
W
73
m
a
a�
.b
O
cC y0., M
� Y
U V
C'n � 4 te a.
N rte.' N in U
> vO Y > N
�Q�un�uo
co
0
O
N
N
O)
m
12-
0 O
U
0
N
L
3
N
LL
r
W
d
.Q
F-
3
N
Et
Nav�•3w�
bD
a•�
b
� �
�
.�
o
U
y rl
N
z 2
0
• C•i N
U y
a
Cd o
ors g 3W 3
r.y
O
•O cq En U N
y N r
. y .bCd
N O O�ryy
s� cl La.
4 P. 0.i ° 0 '�"cd
b
oma+. •>
-. r�.�
M
OCd
0
3 T N
cd
cd
p OL.
> Cd [d N
0v'i 3•° ��
y y y
rfj >,O A A
�
_y
W N� +�••' � y U W
Cd
b
C-4 Cq Cd
3a 0 ¢ U
W
H is H cc O En Ov O
U
U �r
cl O
U y
N
N bb
a
o
cd
0-4
N
en .
V] '� �
� . b.•A
tri
to O
4,
CC
Y CN�i
.xg- WO.
U Q
ci
C
CLC CL03
(D
LO
O
N
N
rn
cD
a
m
C
O
U
0
N
L
7
m
LL
N
Ycd
U z N N N N
.0 G
a'�•3xxxx
a
c o
o 0 � 0
cd
U
r . O >
W o b
N U
O � Cd
x w
b
to
O
cz,
a) p
co
m cC p
7O�yy
cd
x
O
Y
_O
o
U
U
on
aoi
.d rn
cc
NU
w o
O
a)
o
?
cd cd O
¢ U
C>7
N p U
>
i .�
�>i'.
xv�wu:w¢-
O�w
LO
O
N
N
N
m
m
CL
"O
N
7
C
O
U
v
T
N
lC
N
LL
T
Ch
LU
N
f0
F -
'a
a�
h
q
o O O U CV1-4
pp
N
r�+i
cC0
a-. G c cC
0 W ZC2 3wv�
b.
cd 5
M b A O ° O
N N x Q co� .— O
Q �
xx o o 0CLI
o P. N r.
V fit o
UO U y
O ybs.,, � ,�J• •Y.
0 0 0
x'd owxuu¢
° � o
Ln cn ' cd cd Q)i ami p
N N a+ � ,Ur ." "d N CYC
CC 6J 0
'd U •- •ti � Uo CIS
cn
-d
x a w Q U P: x w
LO
O
M
N
N
0)
(0
0-
0 O
U
r
O
N
L
M
d
LL
T-:
Ch
W
H
a
a�
y
a�
b
�
U p O
C's
Cd Cd
N
U
�• U
~
•�
UD
e'l
M -ti
N bA
u,
Q)
7 ' c)
cl u
n
O
m
O
W
pU
}rl
CA
N
{Y''1!
•Y
N
0
Nva
z
z 12
cd rYi�
cw OCd
m
a
cd
d
b
Y3
' cd cti O
N
O,'"
N,+" N
"-' N N
O, 3 N
0
cd
y0„
45
}'
0O
° w a� °
o 'A
u .b V1
q
N ¢'
O •Y t -i
'f t]. U O Ri cd
r.
cd
N
¢, u .V N s, .0.
u•
N U
O cd
c U ca
N O U
O " cd
-C f'
a
°_
3
� t
a0i N
w � o
a '� o
u
a °
U)
o u°- `�
" o o
a� 0 Y o
U N
O 0 U
U m
N
cd
s. O
O
-
F," Ca/]
o
+�.+
t-. O v
° y �
b 4: •o u
v In
3
U
,d
o �y
b 4: vim] A
M m
� b -s cud
w 0
C's z3b u 6
°U
q
--0
obl)
0
b n d d N N
cd a[
jQy+ ��y
Cd [�J ]I � �]
•1-�
�y �t •i
��y " ��� Ucd
O U
�y CC U y.., O •y,
O
Vi
f6
^ N
..+'yy Cd ..�i
..Ni Cd O .:..j U m mU Y
O
Ri Y d U Cd �'
Cd
rn YOr U
id ' ��.'
(d
N ,� '�.' '+
y N U
U—
0 N
C:
,
'�'!' O
h N cd
.�+ ,-Y-i N Q cd O
o
Z 3
w id
ani o ani Y
o o b.
d
Cd
°
y
°
cd"''"
° 0 bA
W
Cd O �'
[- a C7 u
i; Y
O
u 3
Cd 0 U .Y .d
o
�N
N i -I SZ.
o
O ° O . N
(1)3. N P, w C's R;
�, .a
cn
it
cl O
i
H�
'0F, ++
ti
C'sCII
U
U
U)
N bD
N bA
u
1-4
u
M M
cd cd
Cd O
a�
a N
° 0"
v'
O U
o >
O N
w
C13YO
�• o
cC
i. P,
1.) °°' o a 0 o
� d� b
�
-1 J v b
ani ? Q
W o
'"'3
lam]
n
N U
x o U U U
x a 3
w a w
LO
0
It
N
N
O)
ca
0-
T -
Ch
LU
_d
H
a
Q
W
d
v
NWV�•�W,�
O
U �
� O
c3 �
d ci cl
bA
•� •0 DD
N ai Fa V� •�
�cd
Cbo�wcd
c0 Cd N
PQ °
.Y N 0
GOQ
�y Lncp U N
ro
O p 0 0 0
xi UUUw V]Ud
o Cd 3-.5
� a.ocq3a0 w
a
0X a�3oN
•�+ UO
U 5
00 O
i� d V °
0 O 3 b cd
y m 0
cd `� 0
o
O cd 'C N N �"
•b 4.) O
rA
Ucq
a' to
W :n )
cd
++
co .d >
c) 0 U rn cd N
O caO C)0 MO
N
O'er N H'.7
O) O N '.j 3 ¢ m ."
SOS-., W
as
N
O W
P. .
7
LO
0
LO
N
(0
a
a�
c
0
U
T
0
N
m
3
d
LL
T
LLQ
N
F --
d
N
vi u
z
•rte q �o c � �
cd ;
aEA e4 o`diu Z Z
cn
M
0
o a b o
a 0 x 'Z El 40, N �to
C0N v�,
Cd m
�Y��
..
Cd p' tj" av'j N U a' cd b
U � r� a 0 Cd — o a 3 -0Cd
O� Z WUH ZU W QLYi k -i
4 O id O
p ¢ 's g O �O ':' .ONr .O ', O
ocZ .���
ai Q UO .d '°" 0 0 ani � - o m cd
�o (�� ° a'"i Cd
o0, 0 ' = v b Z �°
o W. � � b Ps � . ;3h .- � r; � o w
a� a o A w° (1)— cd:' o to cd a O
r.b N• a� v c Pcd O
cd Cd 0 , � U ami
rA
vb M- .> 0 oN b ani ani
cl
W °�,•o bow Q a'cocc
C14 cu cd
a b Y
5 as o
a � � c
w
b o cd
cd
o oio
N �/] V]
t'Q
E
a) •� N � +O+ � Q
a bob a' bAIn
U
CL a) in cd r.
zw�rz )u
LO
0
N
N
N
N
7
C:
0
U
v
T
Q
N
L
m
LL
N
LU
d
t0
F-
a
a)
W
d
"o
M c o
NprV� �W�
cd
yw
U cid 0 cd
O f, vi K b cc
O •� N � N U
o � o o o
s. O i ° m �" " U D U N
a bq F~ •X O bq Y w U
ICE G r. O�U' N 'b O N N
U
Cd
+- i.-, w cd p cd 113 N y U
r. 5 -cul o o sCC� a
cd .�-. cdCd
r' ter C N cd Ur.O cn., N
W y v bF~ Ej 76b r.
O U id O ip
Ub" O O
' �U„ N cd
Cd O
¢
H x o 'cl � -d A
U)
O C
cd cd
�U
w
r.
(D on
w •17
�
0 0
o .�
�:s W) O V) O
rn a) O
0 04 w
W C'� o o o
��
N •X� 0
z W�fx U >
W
N �!
cd
y^7 N
y0 U b cd O U N
ul
cli
cd O N
� y .U+ .S.' vUi N � • � � � ' ' O
Q r w as w N
CD Q) Uri,' Y ° 3 ���
P-�N,y..� �U.I 3O O En
Cc)
Y f1 cc U Y ° Y i—I Y 0° c,
a °
ou .- 0 0 o o
O
P4 L�j
cid O U cd O O Q' 'G q
�p b 4j 0 cd 0
b b F." N �/ b O
-U+
ON cd
O N cots b fs O N
V O2 • Q" $3, O O G N U
41N on o
C
Cd
U
0
°
0 � U
O
.� as
0"z a� v
x�i
w
°
M � � U 'p
C) vu)z
0
r -
C14
O
O)
(0
z
cd cd d•
� Nly
U b
U
�
CdbQ`d
N
N Q CIS "0
O
¢I Y
W W G y �
Q'•y ��
U
Cd
cOd
zzQz�z¢H
cn
T
U)
W
F --
v
to
N O
zC,3
o�
0 z
XLOo
W � �
zz
cd
Lrl
bA
� Nly
Y
U
�
N
U
ZZCD
r
N
U
ai O
Cd
cOd
LL
T
U)
W
F --
v
to
N O
zC,3
o�
0 z
XLOo
W � �
zz
cd
Lrl
bA
LO
0
00
N
a)
0)
N
a
N
7
C
C
O
U
v
0
N
to
d
LL
V-:
ch
LL
d
L�
r
a
m
y
a
.y
�Q
a�
I
o
0 �
O °
N 'i.
o
El
cc
>2�o.�o
to
0 0 m O
c� p .� N Cd
a) N
04 0
►. 0
�O co y sU, O O .0 b
O U ,b N O U • � c� c� � �+
H �.� • A w a c 04 0 a>
O.
"Yam Cd
00 O
cd
to�.��
.4 -C8 o
a> y 0vUi O P,
(1)o �
`Cd PU U O
45
C4-4 ° °.�.
O U
4
v o�.1po ° o�';
ca 0 0cd
v cd Id
O zi N dq p
zo O
p N0
O
N O 4i iC
Hsi.
P. C bDP,0 0
LO
O
O)
N
N
cu
0-
0 0
U
0
N
f0
7
d
LL
T
Ch
W
F-
a
a�
N
a�
rt
W
Cd
� ca Cd c
y bA N to N
W '17 W 17 m
In 0
b N rO y 0
� Y
� � � � Ll. O •� � O
0 3 p -
rn O J by
0
Cd
�a o
CIS
U
I-: o N O
Oca .Si Li U Cd 4-i O
.Y a� Q) y — !;� y
o C Caa E aui .0 U b
b Y o o
>3a�•n
N
cd OU A 00 U O N
N 0 ..; 0
° 'd --d
W4=+ OC,3 cl
c`na 0 3 U
N
H Y 4 m A"
In
Cd
°
b U
0 O 3 >
gib �'
c o
cd
cd
Cd C) a, o
U blo
P, cncd
�_ 3
N> b O N O v U
N N •� 4-c N 0 '�
� a> bu
u bo u H P.
-0 a.0 do 0
N `" W o N o
C U N '~ O d ,., O
ca ,s," �' ca ,�"
.-i Y .b ,s." O �.
N U o u= N c� U
W acn
a) • CO
3 •
00 p U b 0V3 CO 0 U
N N N N v' 2 N N ID -Ij
O O
Cd cd Cd c'a"
U Y U U
w V
o~n a bin V
U
O
O
O
O
.�
.�
.�
O
z�
�
°�
z�
O
°�
z�.
In 0
b N rO y 0
� Y
� � � � Ll. O •� � O
0 3 p -
rn O J by
0
Cd
�a o
CIS
U
I-: o N O
Oca .Si Li U Cd 4-i O
.Y a� Q) y — !;� y
o C Caa E aui .0 U b
b Y o o
>3a�•n
N
cd OU A 00 U O N
N 0 ..; 0
° 'd --d
W4=+ OC,3 cl
c`na 0 3 U
N
H Y 4 m A"
In
Cd
°
b U
0 O 3 >
gib �'
c o
cd
cd
Cd C) a, o
U blo
P, cncd
�_ 3
N> b O N O v U
N N •� 4-c N 0 '�
� a> bu
u bo u H P.
-0 a.0 do 0
N `" W o N o
C U N '~ O d ,., O
ca ,s," �' ca ,�"
.-i Y .b ,s." O �.
N U o u= N c� U
W acn
a) • CO
3 •
00 p U b 0V3 CO 0 U
N N N N v' 2 N N ID -Ij
O O
Cd cd Cd c'a"
U Y U U
w V
o~n a bin V
U
O
� bn
u bn
Q)
ca O O
O
ca O
7.zx
Q)
by
Q o
A g Q)
U
o.
o
a9L4w
.
o.
�
> o
cn 0
cn 0
P. ¢ x
V
a
N
WD
b
q
V
�
O
F -I
bo
o
N�
z 2
b
oyon
b�o�
'C N
U 4
b y O N/
d
�' VNi .b N
U a c W)
.,t
cd
Cd
o
•�y U .7
N UJ
N U
N
y i. oO w
b —U) v� U�
O
4,•U Q�
•� Q O
�� y�y
4-4bb
°
�. � •
O O
B, G -d
as
a��i �d N a - bq�n
v 0 y
O a +� b b aqi
s4 b p. 0
03cn
iw��as~�°v
o v a
o s, v_°
o o
'C O cd —O W N
+U•' N� '�' O cid
�' N
O •� 'C O
W
N5
Hvcn��
o
w y O
N S3�'b CV
p
bA
00.5 ri c��
,0
N "
sem. p
'+�, `d '
C
P4
Cd
ccd
a� oIU
a� �
iAE
a� N
p
�.
P. oda
oa s� s�5.
b
�
•
ci o
u
a a
cd U
P4
Q .4"'.., O bD
S u
a�
q o
Cd �
U
o
vi
N
V]
W .;8
'C N
N U
U
In
cqa
0 • U
ci
u
4
.U.
O •�
cn � �
a w w
LO
O
C7
m
M
0-
0 O
U
v
T
C)
N
7
N
LL
T
Ch
LU
d
H
d
N
d
w
0
Cd 0 a�
0
N 'O �
N
a cn A
O �> G O
C'srn O
O U C,3 >
O N
cn >
cCo
i
Cd N
CU p o cd 0 0 ON ,o 4-. N U 0 4-;
a. N N � pp 4- > b y
3 b° (1)' o
> p P4
O _ 'n Y •0 •-r N
�
cd > rOn O w
C ��y V
W O O� O O G 0 O .,
C) b o (D o > 0���
N 0 0 N 'O O 0 N �y N
In rn
U
4�
O
bA
m
�i
U
yw
a
1
r
0
o a-'
z2
NyJ
0 U
;
>
A 4i
N "
> w o Oo
to 4.
0fO.i'
� O � � (�j N 1•r � 1r w �
•� U U�+ O U Lr"' o
}, V Lr U.
, rr P. o O -Y.�r a U U 0
O� ,y .d >O
> c� n �, b P
N ¢' .y 0 cP1 04
cid (%r r.+
-,Z, s -r 0O Rei 0 cd 'Y C,3
C13 � +.� N N ty U . �r C¢, 2 �
>C13 V r .d v O ani ami 0
0 o Y o c oEr, d
U S�
cd N Cd > N cd � b-rA cd 3
—0 COD
P4 o
0 In Cd
b b4 U + 0 cd
'A �i
O
��c-d+ U
N
cd
cd
cd
N .O
iCIO
P��1R'P;ci
W
ou QQ
c0
Ln
0
N
(')
4)
0)
c0
a
c
0
U
er
r
O
N
m
7
N
LL
T.;
Ch
W
N
H
a
d
.y
N
ct
b o
cz
++ u p Cd U cd U
yL:N �Lr4 L9
~ •L � � F -I � N b0 N
o
U y
of � 'd^' aU+ N • ti
o a Q a CdCd
Wo :
o qun
UR'°, W °� Z
N 0
U
cq
� Wz. co
0bo00 N
cd
' UC3
O �" "" O
a0i CAdo api c❑sd o o
o Cd 0
w cd co
Cc
W 0 Ao 01� A s b o
0 co
oa 3• o+.o o'er
cl cd
a
�u�cl
a� ... o to p o
o a tin
W
V+r '�'".• cd U U
f=1 t,L. O blo 45 ate- 9
OO bA N
N 'F 0.4 •� W 'in
o U
0 .� v
O
cd y yU•� r� m N Q'
CL s. o _
u
R Rd p O O cid U W cd
Hu
CZ < O F-
H W W
LO
O
M
M
O
ca
IL
N
7
C
C
O
U
0
N
f0
7
LL
Ch
W
d
f0
O
.b cd
y U �
i
C O O O
�jcd U cd U � -0
rn
eq
a
"I q i," p/ t�. b
NP4
bA �i
v
7.. 0 U
O cd
- u6,In
b d a
0
°AR3 a 3 >
)
wp ami CIO
-15
W p�jpO a > b
N � z2
01)
cl a [ a c°
� o cd N N 4UU.� � � OS". Ca/] � � b o Q)�
�_ p ^? co
_
O cd N
�O O O O O ,sn" O �••� �p w N OU O .�,
o � Q cd 3 4° p �a Q � N ocl
3 3 4°
oN H o b P4 0 U
� o y b a W o
'n rn Q o � cd 0, w
y -d a"ib x �o o a oN cd �Q. o
O o
U c CA t: ami 0 M U d U� O 0 4, �.
pC b�D id id N N U O by V] N bq � Ll cd
cd
O O i.
p o cd o b w o b u) cd U Y an vl
`° cd ami .O }; o (D�' U o 4
W H cd cd U cd s. s. ts. �i a-. 04 U H cd v� H f -L .fl m m O p. U
b �
Cd
0
cd cd c� U
'IT
NPL4 •'� �4 ' 7r.
U _
a cd O
Mc
.y cd U
b1D 'Scn
N V] •� � � '� Pr V]
O U U
a3 O
i1. O •p U .>>
O 6" cUd L. N y
064 Q ro
U cn c� it 04 o v O
L:
� F-� Q E•-+ NCA � W V] Q
U')
0
Cl)
N
O1
(0
O
7
C
C
O
U
T
0
N
m
a�
LL
T
W
d
ca
H
a
a)
.y
O
W
r. 0 o b
O
o a
al 0
CIS 4 Q) cd> u C u
> .0 C7 "�
a�
N y W d Y
bC,3 U
O O N N 3 0 br. O
N¢ U C'" cq3'
o W H
CU v 4 bA
O O OIC
O cid >
o v- a�a.= 3 .A
ate-. O p
U 0 y 0
b' b cd L.
a� O O U o d.] cd
ago
o 0 o b
U b�A C N Cc cd cc U V] Z'b
,./ 'u C [� Y .. - N O W U
— cC T ' ^ O - U
E -. •Y N 'b °° V] o
° ¢Cd
° >�' u
Q
N
N b
Cd E" P4 a� b CO o
j
3 °J ,o
Cd n
• H N U
O t-. H 4:
th
r.
0 U w c
O N by
w �
'rn
W
W � Vl F" al
s. U
$a, O. U 0
a�
o o
r. 0 o b
O
o a
al 0
CIS 4 Q) cd> u C u
> .0 C7 "�
a�
N y W d Y
bC,3 U
O O N N 3 0 br. O
N¢ U C'" cq3'
o W H
CU v 4 bA
O O OIC
O cid >
o v- a�a.= 3 .A
ate-. O p
U 0 y 0
b' b cd L.
a� O O U o d.] cd
ago
o 0 o b
U b�A C N Cc cd cc U V] Z'b
,./ 'u C [� Y .. - N O W U
— cC T ' ^ O - U
E -. •Y N 'b °° V] o
° ¢Cd
° >�' u
Q
N
N b
pq
j
'C
v
3�>cjCJ
cd a
a�
o o
k
p� o
HEn�4 C.-OaaHxWa
N
w
LO
0
LO
a)
0)
w
� b ami N
C� N �
C/)
b 4? U N N O c m N
0 o 0 a�
'b0 F"i iUi �" Y o
P,, 0 C's
%U - M cd M CZ N vii
In
0o p
In b�� Y cd
rCAs"5 o"
Y fn � ° ✓Il U b
to a ou •
b '� ani 0 b a C O
a� U 'v • 3
Y 0 1.
00' O °
U
O w cd
°;b>�Q�
Ncd 0 0 cd
'
�0 U o "� o
N O 1A •> 'b ti ¢,,O p
H LUi o cn '2 •��' N A. P.
b N
�
� u
o
4
cl
Cd v3
cn
YwH
U,
to
0 w cl,
In
N ?+ V]
U3
Cd
0
r
N
U
O
0 [� w
Cd
O
O .r
O
O
0
O V
Cd
as
bA OCc.,CC
> aU+
� 't
o
CO
° Cd
Cd 00
E E P4 P4
-,QQ
-�
� b ami N
C� N �
C/)
b 4? U N N O c m N
0 o 0 a�
'b0 F"i iUi �" Y o
P,, 0 C's
%U - M cd M CZ N vii
In
0o p
In b�� Y cd
rCAs"5 o"
Y fn � ° ✓Il U b
to a ou •
b '� ani 0 b a C O
a� U 'v • 3
Y 0 1.
00' O °
U
O w cd
°;b>�Q�
Ncd 0 0 cd
'
�0 U o "� o
N O 1A •> 'b ti ¢,,O p
H LUi o cn '2 •��' N A. P.
C's Cd
U
N
O
O �
'cn
N cd O
O
iC U
N U N ice-.
P" 3 CO
pp O 0
H 'I Poi W xi
b N
�
� u
o
73
cl
•'�
O
'rn
L!
N ?+ V]
Py
r
N
U
O
O
O .r
O
LL
C's Cd
U
N
O
O �
'cn
N cd O
O
iC U
N U N ice-.
P" 3 CO
pp O 0
H 'I Poi W xi
_LO
O
M
a)
O)
m
CL
a)
C
c
O
U
0
N
m
7
d
LL
V.:
Ch
W
d
.Q
a
aD
a)
Nprr/�� W
Y
Y
t4 -2
O O
0 0oo C
E P4Uc°v°�
cd
cd
tw
TO
Y U
c
N
.a
� U
CD
LJOO
1`
M
O
O)
(6
7
C
C
O
U
0
N
m
m
a�
LL
N
W
d
F
N
.y
b
y U
w
b nz� Y b
V Cd o
Ct 3 m as -15 CIO0
Ew O U 'I -,cd
O 4i 0
4J 0 P.
� on Own Q o
COO
Y
�O N vyi
}"O'i
E wQW�P4W
O vca
M _
W ID
t Col_
cd > 4, -d Y f•,
C's�+ y O N
o ani O cod y b aa) W In u° b
fy A > U -0 2 �: `.� 00 c0 ' p 'O O 0
y o F !� 11 -0 a� 3 P. " O O
o v ° .
cc
FO—. '" O aJ N
s cd cd 0 " -0 U N cd .- cd Yi
ate-. p 0 O 0 zj
cd �+ ^' o
cd cd a) y d y
0� y cd
(
cd U OU .. Y Q Y cd .b y .b N
it
o • � 3 � �. O 0011 .ty^ .^' � 00 Q. 'd � Y O
O O N rUn U U •. W j 0 'b
0.�'yF~3wF~.�v a
to
cd
R.
Cd
L
o
0 co
'Y O Y O O a� 't Y
�z � O
0 y
'd N b O :3 .�
° p U a) C,4 O r3 W
p Y 0 '� O a
Cd U O44
Y ccLn
-00 y cd 4-4 Y 4.4 N
a) �' O 0 o
Id
C's t"' O L." '00 O W cd 'b
U
In
U aJ
1 cd (D w
y
cd b • �
> 0
aj U
�i
cd
U
w
4.
o i
o �
> O
Oti
o
y O b
ci
a.
> 0 A�
°
- �
N
aJ 0
H p
W 1n
H <C F' d
LO
0
00
M
a)
0)
(0
d
U
N
co
Cdo
H
.d
Ca
3
co
cc C4
v �
(4-4 U
O
a
Cd
cd
cl
m
m
U
Lt 0
w Cd C)
O N t CUC b O ,�
y y O U OA W) w
b�
O . ,� cd
O O +� U O
N vUi U N N ..�., cd
o�o0o�
cd U U m 0 U
;3z�o
U U
o ani abi o W. o `d 3
l0 H
d N •� ate+ U
c�
U rA v� U O
fyy 'U cz N
W G H u U
U s f)0 w
00 4-i O D U U O .� j �3
N bA 04 Q "" •�,
. � O
°H' . a a
Cd
U
w
Cc
U
w
�G
U
LO
0
0)
M
0
a
7
C
0
U
0
N
7
d
LL
r
Ch
W
N
m
Cd �
c
Cd Cod
Navy
3 Cc Cc L
�
0ci
a� �.
�;
LO
0
O
N
(6
b
a
W Eg
u
w
y U
Nav�•3�
Cc
00
o
C,Cd
U
b
U
'
N W •.�
G
b0 'b
«i Y «S
o
¢�o >bo
�❑+wp;� 3 o•o
Cl) fpi U
acd
CIS 0
�0
o � aim
�,r.
03 ° o c° O °
N U • 7r .� aJ '� '_' 4Ui
O O O 'Y > Q. O p bq U U
° O
P, f,• = b
o
cd
Nto
�,.C�C
O cd C .-Y� -IZI Zn cd U
O
�
�! b w U v' cd O o
Y O N y U 0
N cd c,;3 U to M O U O cc cc 'IT
o ct �, U 'b N
�" b ° o ' cc w
�. 3 °� o
w cd a� W
00�* Ca w o 0 CD ,.�>
U
w
on
M
Cd
Cd
0
U
S".
bA
m
ca
U
4�
m
LO
0
v
c�
7
C
0
U
v
0
N
i
lC
7
.Q
N
LL
P
Ch
LU
N
N
to
cc
v °
W5 U K
•1 a "o 0
Ua.'°U �U
Cc
cc � o Z, co
0 o o
F �U�°h�v�
m
U
Cd 0
N
Y
U=- U m U y
N .r. c',
sr N 4+ �.," O O
O ¢, cd cy . Z N c�
3 U
U v a�
to U U
Q O >cd
-d d C0 En
3
U cC
N O ,y bUA ccq ;j
cd
IP
Y
P —L s 0 o P,
U+ N
Yi
vi UUy a0+ � 4 d O
r Y b U L C
cC s. cd N
O b ,S.
W •d r >,
\O U y O 'y
p U N N Ob -0 N N
F~a3.5-0-S3'�D�.
N
d
rn
C,
v
cd
Cc
0 bA
�n
3
a '5�
Ua.'°U �U
Cc
cc � o Z, co
0 o o
F �U�°h�v�
m
U
Cd 0
N
Y
U=- U m U y
N .r. c',
sr N 4+ �.," O O
O ¢, cd cy . Z N c�
3 U
U v a�
to U U
Q O >cd
-d d C0 En
3
U cC
N O ,y bUA ccq ;j
cd
IP
Y
P —L s 0 o P,
U+ N
Yi
vi UUy a0+ � 4 d O
r Y b U L C
cC s. cd N
O b ,S.
W •d r >,
\O U y O 'y
p U N N Ob -0 N N
F~a3.5-0-S3'�D�.
N
d
O
r, a3 M o v V
a�
o
F- U R; P4
LO
O
N
a)
O)
(B
0-
a>
0
C:
O
U
v
V-
0 O
N
i
cC
a)
LL
T
Ch
W
a)
IC
N
b
(D
N
a+ U �p a:+
Y
Cd Cd
Cd
U 'G
f ••,
,+
!�
N
a W
W
01) ocl
cl
V] cd
V
O
O
p/
p co
cd
co
to
W
cd � "
on ct
..cl
(5
•
0
N/.
on
�
z
z 4�Ui
b O
Cd
b
�w
b
° 0Y a> Cd U
bw
3
,�
��
3�
OO
N d
_
O
° 4-
w 'b
OCd
b 3
C)
C.
C) o
Zao pmU,
boOo ami i
to m
C)
�a
d•0 v 0
l
M
,.5 N
OoO 0m 0 o
Cd
v
UON
+' F"+ O a U� 0 O
p U
W
p w N °
p U 5 0
N Cd Y O U U N. O Y
�. "�
¢, O
U N U
on
ti••� • ^' b �+"
p o
o
c �, w
a° 4) o
U o o U¢ o O o
v
:d
� .v
� o � � � � � w
°
'+=
� o
0 Cd C',
7' (d
3 W
7j
a
v� �•�•y! 4�
(D
Cn • ^ d
r� U
y N
U v° p. U
N 4
°
W b vU Y
N w
.>
o �+ a .
o Z Cd
0
�
Cd o .�°, Cd
0 a to
o
WN id N o
cd th
v
Y
N
"'�
�"., a
o
o
o v
p-' N
y0., �°/' a'Ci a�i
U CO O~ " Ri Y
sem.
p
oUo
R, 0 Cd
•� p
Cd �„i Ud
i
►Y
W
,moi
N
H� o a
o
Q
N
C)C)o
a3Piz.
as CZ
W
cl r
Cd
to
�
ci
V
clcl O
Y
p
I -4
W
Cd Cd
U
U
c
q i
m
twt
O In
N
Y
O
CL O U
Y
U N
('. O
o 'd
U
>
Q
C
j
U
cl
NC� ¢,O
C No
4 d
N O O O
zm
co
LO
O
M
m
0)
c�
7
C
O
U
v
0
N
L
3
N
LL
Ch
w
M
F-
d
141
U 'C O 0 Op 0
O �o N> U b vOi O
U y U U O y
3 o °' a
p
.o cd y �' z U u
b U N H y
¢" b N bA �i b o 3 O
U (]�y U od
cOd Q
O tU. W N 6. o O
O O
U Ca 4-. 'b 'app O O U �? Q. �
cd
cdcd
y b
W y o o W
O cd O U y U ...� cdQ) rl
sy V
U
0- w ccdd "° 'n 3
O
0
O O U cn o
O cd +-'
'do a z v
U cd Y a. >
Q" o Y cd
3 U 0
Cd U •,�, '� cyd ", 0.i O
M
b0 ^d U ' y U
V '� � ' U
� cd a. � .� . � N 1•n U
b �
•�, s0. O N U cd Q" U
o o�'y U °�' cd 3
U Pr O O U s. b cd
y y 3 o o
to y
o
5 cd d o°�o °A ami
No V
U
U O N b o U o bq U U
H N b W 3• 3 '� o
LZ
U
Lo
0
N
O)
M
0-
�-° V O
Yo bz�d
O 'C °, ti
p N
V a) coo U b e p ON
Cd '� V .b ° cd VNO `n 3 N
A O cl
q N V 0 o O
P, cd
COD U o ' p ani
o 'S b
>,co
V > ° on Cd p
d y o� y V w0 Q b 0.
ch In
V ° o ,� > >b
> > U V a
V V v O 0 0 i". H. cd H .•+ U
-0 V w .C) V V zj V O V U
w V N> cdCD
p b b4 Y O
O OIn
N �. • N r7 N N N d' N
H PCS b 6, w °U by w bq ON G." N P4
i
V
zH
C's CD
cj
0 oo �� y °J H V "°
O V 0 OH H CO
bA a
-" p
> f". H
''In
C's y p
r.
_
U V U '� z
Q
U 0, N �.
o
P, 0 a
obi 4 >
>33o Q,
p N O O 'G." V rn wcc
o
° O � z °
>V4o�.�Qo��� co
'' p U
V O w°
cd
C,3 a
C) b o Eb v °�° d' a
O U O
N U V O v� b
Cd
N P�Ci o 0 o O .5 O O
F o d H W o 3• 3 U 3 N
Q cqs
U
N
7
C
0
U
v
T
N
c�a
.LQ
d
LL
T
Ch
W
N
F-
d
y
a�
cc
q
NPyV�.'�rW�"
�•�
b
� �
o
Cd
N
/
z
V ~O
N
YO c
O
U 0
'� ¢
'dO
N
� o
v
vv++
❑❑
N 'C
U N
.b (V o w
r.
cd O
Ss+ 0
O N •r-+
>�"
N OCd
N"
y N vUi O ¢.
V cd
cdO w
cd O
U • c�
a>i a>
O, F! q
0
Cd 3 0.0�
o U 4-. �n q
�..o
-- 0 P
p.
0
a
o
W 0> `"
a °?
3
o a
3
a
co
—cod
a�Uco
3
cd
a�
° �w
�Ell
u;
eb)nw �(� a 3'
o
b
y
�
U
cd
F+1
U
NP:zz
a
U
a
q id
W
w
N
rA
m
b
N L
id cd
U �+
b U
0
cd V] N
cid O U
�D 3 Q
0 0
U
r
0
N
i
lC
7
LL
r
Ch
W
d
a
a�
y
a�
cc
b
y
�
U
�
ct, U �i
Nwv�3w�
a�•3
� Y
o �
b
da'
r.
N c
�
W
l
3 0
�c
bJO rA
o m
v
N
Cd
Gf)
cts -0
L.Cdy
4J O +-d .Y O
N — 4-c �, �. o U
In W
>
-0 3.- °�' A
p. o 0 � a� y Z >
o
o y *.
v
.� o � 'o
o 1:1Ua�
a, o
mi
W cn W
m,
b ¢Cc 04
acd
d - m Qo
d'�CO
ani `� oo
OP,V(D�
o (D�•r
CD
�a
o
;;�,��40�oNEn
>0 P, d o�
��b
x °°
o
o 'b
•P o 3 0
o
w oo p. Q 3 N
'" W
1 '� cd
PUi
cdCd
U 5 O
UCd
c '+ `{.,•'
+"
p.
W o 04 O
cd
O�
0
o
COO 3> a s
`O x> b o a'
s >
v a�
O
ON p
�
W 04 P4 0
U
,�
O id �S"U., � , v�
� �, b ��S".,
pip � p � N cyYC
� � � �••� �
N v
Cl r4
T
F+1
w
cd U
bA
pp
N
,
V] '� �
P•+ • �
C �
�
3Q
N
�P43 0R;
' c
a '� •3 � N a '� 3
w
y
b
�
y V
i O
O
r cd 0
V ..+C:jU +' j:+
c4 U
i•-1
Y
U N 0 RS
U
Ui
(�] y
Cd
3 0
Lnb
Pr cn
as
�N�
r
O
N
V
C
>
cl
CY
-•• O Cd 65 N
° al b
N O
Pi
N y�� •�, , XX O
c°C cd C4
N
R,'
•},
Cd
, XX
w
3xun Q
LL
� N
o > + cC 'U N
O U •-• m 6' '� p
U'� W U .O S3.
r'�, ' U) ca .� y CJ O o cd i."
b 0Id Id
a�+
1. Q•i ,�+ .'�.+ �+•� AJ N 14-4O
V cd
-d > '�% c) d ai Z 00
U
rA Go
Cd
cd u CD
cd oU NCd 0
'D
a Cd o ! (1) w
L, X4300 >o r.0 'IT
�b
M 64 C3 2 t! g
3 N
p o U> oC's Cd
.O O � •�
Cc, °.P. d-0 oz's
°Y °In
Y a�
cd O •�' O U O L1. ,� O O C1.
s. P bA m¢ cd d O s• k
O t 'n bo
b o' cd Q O' 0 N o '0
-UO o 0 Q 3 No CC b °
p o 8 3 0
3In
P x .O O UCd
Q.
�3cd >ba 0r. 00�o
oUx P. ° 'd ani
Q, sl �. O b a >,
O p
N O cc a N Ur .22 U ow I-. .�
> >Cd �.�
Oi
bA
as
U
ii
b
�
y V
i O
O
V ..+C:jU +' j:+
c4 U
q
N
.
U
C4 V]
Pr cn
r
O
N
V
C
>
cl
LL
.O O � •�
Cc, °.P. d-0 oz's
°Y °In
Y a�
cd O •�' O U O L1. ,� O O C1.
s. P bA m¢ cd d O s• k
O t 'n bo
b o' cd Q O' 0 N o '0
-UO o 0 Q 3 No CC b °
p o 8 3 0
3In
P x .O O UCd
Q.
�3cd >ba 0r. 00�o
oUx P. ° 'd ani
Q, sl �. O b a >,
O p
N O cc a N Ur .22 U ow I-. .�
> >Cd �.�
Oi
bA
as
U
ii
LO
0
00
0)
c�
Ch
W
F—
(D
.y
"0
w
° ..y
M
CIS
71
N eo
C,3 Cd U
X4:.33
CJ Cc
U
Yw3
U
�w
In
o
ev
�„ ,gin •.. �--� '
PL4 3 w
a� on •.. �
a4 3
� oo •.,
a '7
� o0
Y Y 'c
°
� a
N N
U b
V
¢, Yf..', O, p N
G 0 c
O
Cd
w
°`"
a� _ 361
�P" °
yob
b wcd
1 U p�•
N
3�0 3c�a
3 -Sw
z 2
o a 3
o ° o
co
°' o o
b
.�
>. o o
o a�
3 6
�.Y Y
� Y v d b O °' z"
a�
a� b> p'
>
v, ' d Y >
ami
(1)' >
v�
ami
co °J
b .�
3 aich
�o
Z
Y
aO
U' G a� a�
Q) Cd> y 0
00 �
v 0 0
r3 O •° U °' U 'o
abi •`� '" 'bA
>U y
y U rn °' •o
� 'G
Q
x., N •0 b O ° •O
}' N 'b
N N �••�
'b OY-,
N cC
N cC y.
tJY°'IT
�:b0ut
� �0 '1)
'b p °n-. UO
�pO�3� �v
"d
N O
O O U N
f� >>
q O �..'
L: vi O
N O Y N
'b U Y� U � O
y Cdy< N
N b
'_'"' N
may/
W ��" cd
'C >' Y
�N-!
CC a • O 11 a'"+ �"
.Y
N L: iJ cd p r�
«S
p"' •s"' cxV Y
cd � .�
"d N U N >' p s., co w
.: N N
U f"., vi on Pr cd
Y U
I:D
00
° • � �« 0 0
�i"y
o
�+
U 'n 0 W CIS
�3> �
a�.y b� o � °
� �
� �
Cdo
ani
�o
x p" o b
o -Y Y o
ani
0
CD 41Y
C,
C1.Q)
cd
N Q o
cUd N U> U' i
N y CD (1) Cd
HM'N�
3H dew d.
G -8
p.
,
E4 o.
as
U
clI
a� 4" o on
U
• � w
4"
U
�,�•• 4=.
In
N
r
a C/) •'�
on
P,
c
W%
' cn
d
03
Cd
cd
• C's al
CJ ca
0 on
� !•�
w
In0
CA
b
0
a) �
�
c�
x
a� p
O
U
O
cC
3UU
3
3Hx
N
7
C
C
O
U
0
N
ca
N
LL
r
Ch
LLI
d
y
a�
b
Vi
U
cC c
O cc
Q W
�wN
V
Aar
3w
a �o
a
u
O
O
0 y
l
Eg
bp 95
O
y u
o
O
A
V�
Z
Z 2
�
a)
q
O
r cYd
•�
OO
ON
O
t1 y
'y O I U
U M
y
cc a)
rn
C
Ln -P
vcd �,w
H ""� .b O fn
U
Ld -P O
cCO y
N Q. U N N• •—, U �. .
o cd ce
Q.
p a
'"
c-c8
�n
O 0 o "o . �
400
A o oN
aui ai CD a o
a3i
to °� A y a, 0
3
0 o anz
o
G
0 o.'o-o iti
i b
aUi
:d A 0
o o o o f .�
da'•°
OU
0
"
o
o
y Q
W cd
0 o o
.�°.°
IORO
•
Y CC
b P.
O aJ •�
oN
V� 'b Q) '0 P, P4 )
o ° °
CL
a� aui
Y
c',
, ❑�
a) C p.
i u
3 C8
W
Q 3 a w.
3
d
H ¢� p.,
cd of
o a "o "o o
(1) 0
b
�
�
u K
U
U
Y.
aJ b0
a) b0
as
U
_
W
N
V] 3 �
� • �
r-� • v�
U
O
s.
� �
CUC
W
CCd
30
3Va
Ln
0
O
0)
m
CL
a)
Z)
C:
0
U
T
0
N
L
fC
N
LL
T
Ch
LU
fC
a
a�
h
71
N
bA ^�
(31 C� '� W �
� . b••A
� u
O
A
Z 2)
N
U Cd y
lr Ci C�
O N
v
W C,3N
•cd
Q sl ¢I
b N > O w
N CdCd (D
N N
cn
�o
.o ° b 0. '
.� " 3
3 a:2 to d a as W
U
P, v � S3 . �� �+ 0
V] �0 0 U V 0 O� O O .� s..
]U w o C � �y a� 0 O
�4
�U�b.ti�d�b�p"3
a� b¢r��4-4 £: .>� o
0 0 O v o o cn
d
a-15
o
W N p s.. y-, N N O OA
w
O ° -C � d p a N 3
a
p,3ascdao>>> Q
0 Q) C.) b
10
o
Q
ascc
a
o �
Navy
3
acn
a03c�
❑ p
l
U
�
p
� y
N •�
t,
4 ca
0 3
U
a
R! U
u�
0
LO
N
0)
M
IL
Y
cd
L9
.
Cc od
Cd
En
U bq
U bA
U bA
O
O
O
Y
cq3 cd
Y
Ld cd
al
G
L:
In
z2
z�
z2
O }' U
.b O
0
U CC
U ¢,
Ocd
a, Cd
v w
41)
O 0 N
cn
U
O
O
y 'S
� O
O�
0 O
r4
22. Q O
U � �
H U b
Y
cq3 cd
Y
Ld cd
al
G
L:
In
U bq
U CW
U b0
cn
U
YO
t U U U
o�
Viz.c= q
p
�Y
J
��0
p N
w w Z
O-0
0
U
O U O U
°
xY�
xx
H Uw Ub
A
Y o
L. O
C7 o
C7a°C7
0 0
C7°v�3
LO
0
N
LO
m
m
O
7
C
O
U
r
0
N
i
M
7
d
LL
ch
LLI
_d
(Q
f"
N
a�
W
y cd
NC4Cn•3(��
dW
y V
Nav�•��
°
al
U b cd M
o w~
.b M M
V1
cc :J
o w
O
v
ca r.
N U O
cd
o o z° q
N a ° o
> ! N
0 °
cd N b O
cd
Q) O
° M N N U O vUi O U
N y cd0 N O
b y w0 C,3 to
o — .0� o DO _ b
r-+ q) cd moi U Y
N Cd 0 CO
wv
O O ID O U .� !
o aQ) •o ' b vo � n .o
w �A `13 C;j ° b
o P, cd o 0 0 P.
a z
C:) b C) o
N
TA
�i
° w °
a `o O
cd U
m 'b b 0 U
U0 O n°O
o°. o U'n g ccd U b
a3 u
cd O �
¢' O c0 'b O w N '2
41 ai N cd s: V
N'� �" f�, C,' O �•' O O O
.O Q)}O,, O cd N N
f•1. y'"•i �" U U U U
0 U p N 6 p N °
o Y > (D.°
° a� deo 0 4)
A y ° > z
cq3
to o o
r cd cy can 'ov
U . �--S O cd rn cd
O
I
60
Q
cli U
H
�
N
o
cli
U Co
>
•'�''
¢
Q
O �
U w
O �
U o
^�
O cn
N U
CD
O
co
LO
a>
rn
0-
v
a: .-- ,4) .a) N O M O cd Cd
d 71 cl Ccc -)b v b chi -d O d cd cd
R: y N w o w o w oW T���
to v Cd bj) d to -0 cd O 0 0 0
Na�n'3w a 3aaCdaaooaacQaa
a � ,
�cd-o
ca 00
� � � �.� •� X0000 �
bA y -k"ii co bq m N V1
C p�"p epi ,� cC rO� cay"~• 0 0 0 0 0 M
N v] cd O cdId
ON Q+ 0 .d f•. UN Y" O cd UP�J++ M , ��" p C'A
S
C O S.U. �/ ¢, N CC cyyd ON ,Y
Otb >N w O Zi t." CCC d' p
O O _ a
>, w 'r v O c� N 'b '� � • � ,� '� �
a) O
,.,
14
3 a,cl, -d .�°. o a; °
p3 cc
N d k" Q v o Q b o
o
O o N U- N c� U U +" m y-" Ucd O N O v Y
�+ �L y U .a -)I
S7 O 3• r, Y Cd O" Y bA b Ci b Y z o o. b
0 C,3
P. b 0, o"� Y
ca
C:) -d oca
co
o Q acd
2. O o p ° d° wo ° w o o ° o
Z o Q ss, a P.
W
tUi, U
Cd ca
o 01)
N P■ V] '� V] V] Cn
a�
cl�
ce O i � Cd m
bo
� Y
p b . cl,
"Gq
al > d ' o
0 sj O
U U O .0 U O U O U
_ _
cl0.
M U bA U Vl U O
-- Uw 0 Uw Uwc4
LO
O
L[)
N
m
M
a
d cV
i -r
U O U 3
F.
UJ
0P,°o:n>o
O .b 44 cn 'ZI U
Fa •cn N �s � °
U~ 7 U •° N N
to
ON U cc o. p. • o
a�
bo O vii O 'C O
o z
CC U
c
O N ►. O � tl, .
O
O
Cn . 3
C
C3
a3
U
cyC aO-,
cd
Cc Cc
U b
Cd
U Li
U
°L
zU
O
0
y bA
bq
z �l.1
N O
N
UJ
O
O
•�
mCd
UWP
U ]
UWP:O
UW
�b4���
��
z�
z�
z
z
d cV
i -r
U O U 3
F.
UJ
0P,°o:n>o
O .b 44 cn 'ZI U
Fa •cn N �s � °
U~ 7 U •° N N
to
ON U cc o. p. • o
a�
bo O vii O 'C O
o z
CC U
c
O N ►. O � tl, .
O
O
Cn . 3
C
C3
a3
U
cyC aO-,
cd
�
°L
zU
ON bA
bq
bq
z �l.1
N O
CIS� Cd co
U U
CO '
O
O(D bo to
bq
z C/) CA
N
Nu
y 4�
U
cyC aO-,
cd
�
°L
zU
UOU
U�
u ln' "
U o
N O
N
UJ
Ca
UWP
U ]
UWP:O
UW
co
LO
0
LO
LO
a)
0)
m
IL
a)
c
0
U
T
N
i
7
.Q
a)
LL
T
Ch
LU
a�
a
h
ct
Y Y
0 Cc cd M
O O O
Cd
bA .b bq ,b bA .d
N
Y
N U C N
o W Y b 0 o
N q 0 N .
0 Q
C:) 3 -o
C's �.
' U C,3 0 . n cOH vii N
bq V
3
Q) r.
W - U
•� O O Q, O
�. tU•,Y ,� •o O
N ^c' '> O o N f1• U
a�
z 0 ami 'o
v N O
O O y
Y
0
U
O
. W
P
U
o .Y
C�j'cd
0 o
u o C
t
ti
O
p O
Cd
-0 O Y
O
a 'm°
N
'b
o
un .U.�
cd
o 3
cq
y+ U
bq
N
VEn
.(,
•� N
y, �' CI] Y 0
Y Y
0�3�3�x
b
.d
a3��y
u,
cd d N
cn�v0U
M 'd -S
4+
N
i
N
o .Y
d
d
p V3
ti
O
~" o
O
a 'm°
UWC7ce.
.
Cd cd
Y U
C
U
cq
y+ U
bq
N bA
N bq
4+
� O
> .� y
N
o .Y
d
d
p V3
O
cd:
UWC7ce.
Ucn
Ln
0
LO
N
01
N
a_
c
0
U
v
0
N
m
7
d
LL
T -
Ch
w
d
H
a
a�
w
3
4)
cu
NP•iV�•�W�
�l'�
VO
q � p
�
2
N
z
o C) �P4 a) o 0 o
O
O M'
O p
,. ;
Attachment 2
Technical Studies