Loading...
2010/11/16 Planning Commission Resolution (2)PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2010-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE MAP AND TEXT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR SOUTHEST SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT LOCATED NORTHEAST OF BODWAY PARKWAY AND VALLEY HOUSE DRIVE (APN 47-111-030) IN SONOMA COUNTY, CA WHEREAS, the applicant, Redwood Equities LLC, has filed Planning Application No. PL2003-031SP proposing General Plan Amendments, and related certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"), in connection with a proposed mixed-use community located northeast of the intersection of Bodway Parkway and Valley House Drive (APN 47-111- 030 ) (the "Project'), in accordance with the City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code ("RPMC"); and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the land use element of the General Plan ("Southeast Specific Plan General Plan Amendments") would alter the configuration of the existing land use designations onsite and add Public/Institutional and Parks/Recreation land use designations. The project site is currently designated Rural Estate Residential, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Mixed Use. The proposed Southeast Specific Plan General Plan Amendments are attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Southeast Specific Plan General Plan Amendments would amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan as provided on the amended General Plan Land Use Diagram attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Final EIR prepared for the Project; recommended its certification by the City Council; and has otherwise carried out all requirements for the Project pursuant to CEQA; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California State Law and the RPMC, public hearing notices were mailed to all property owners within an area exceeding a three hundred foot radius of the subject property and a public hearing was published for a minimum of 10 days prior to the first public hearing in the Community Voice; and WHEREAS, on November 16, 2010, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at which time interested persons had an opportunity testify either in support or opposition to the proposal: and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the General Plan Amendment application for the proposal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Rohnert Park makes the following findings and determinations with respect to the proposed General Plan Amendment and amendments to Land Use Map: Section 1. The above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. The Planning Commission recommends City Council approval of the Final EIR for this Project, including adoption of associated CEQA Findings, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, as described in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2010-30 approved on November 16, 2010 concurrently with the Planning Commission's approval of this Resolution. Section 3. Findings related to the General Plan Amendments. The Planning Commission makes the following findings concerning the General Plan amendments proposed by Planning Application No. PL2003-031 SP: That the proposed site is appropriate for development under the General Plan's Land Use Designations for the site. Criteria Satisfied. The proposed General Plan amendments would be the same as the current General Plan land use designations but slightly reconfigured. The proposed amendments would also add Parks land use designation to the site to ensure adequate area for future parklands. 2. That the proposed General Plan amendments would be consistent with specific policies in the Land Use Element of the General Plan relative to the proposed development. Criteria Satisfied. The proposed amendments are consistent with specific policies in the Land Use Element of the General Plan applicable to the Southeast Specific Plan area. The policies establish a primarily residential development with a mixed use land use designation for commercial and multi -family uses. The proposed development implements the existing land designations and proposes no changes to the existing policies envisioned in the General Plan and is therefore consistent with such specific policies. 3. That a duly noticed public hearing has been held to receive and consider public testimony regarding the proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map. Criteria Satisfied. A duly noticed public hearing on the proposed General Plan Amendments was held on November 16, 2010. 4. That the proposed Project with the proposed General Plan amendments is consistent with the General Plan. Criteria Satisfied. The General Plan Amendment, and consistency of the Project with the General Plan, are discussed in the application materials, the Final EIR, the Specific Plan, staff reports, and submittals by the Project applicant. The City adopts the conclusions and analysis of those documents regarding General Plan consistency. The Project, including the General Plan Amendment, is consistent with the General Plan and will result in an internally consistent General Plan. 5. The General Plan Amendment approved for this Project will not cause the General Plan to become internally inconsistent. Criteria Satisfied. The General Plan Amendment proposed by the Project Sponsors better implements the General Plan policies and goals than does the land use plan depicted in the General Plan, as explained in the Specific Plan and staff reports. The General Plan Amendment and the remainder of the General Plan comprise an integrated, internally consistent and compatible statement of polices for the City. The various land uses authorized for the Project are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan, as amended. The Project is compatible with and conforms to the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan. The Project furthers the objectives and policies of the General Plan and does not obstruct their attainment. The Project is compatible with and in harmony with the General Plan goals and policies. The Project is in harmony with surrounding neighborhoods, and the site is physically suitable for the development proposed. 6. That the City has considered and evaluated the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan and finds that the proposed General Plan amendments are in compliance with the General Plan. The General Plan comprises many objectives, policies, principles, programs, standards, proposals and action plans (collectively, "policies"), as well as performance standards. The City recognizes that the policies necessarily compete with each other. The City has considered all applicable General Plan policies and the extent to which the project conforms to and potentially competes with each of those policies. The City has fully evaluated the extent to which the Project achieves each policy, including those pertaining to compatibility of land use, protection of open space, standards regarding geology, soils and earthquake risks, hazardous materials, flood hazards and drainage, protection of water quality, protection of biological resources, transportation standards and goals, regional and local housing needs, jobs/housing balance, noise, protection air quality, protection of visual resources, standards for public services and utilities, protection of architectural and historic resources, the provision of housing for all sectors of the economic community, and the provision of employment opportunities for residents of the City. The City has also fully considered the Project's compliance with all goals, policies and objectives in the General Plan, and finds the Project in compliance with the General Plan. 7. The City finds that the balance achieved by the Project among competing General Plan policies is acceptable. Criteria Satisfied. The Project achieves each applicable policy to some extent, and represents a reasonable accommodation of all applicable competing policies in the General Plan. The Project promotes the General Plan goals referenced in the CEQA Statement of Overriding Considerations approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 2010-30 on November 16, 2010 concurrently with the Planning Commission's approval of this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Commission that it does hereby recommend that the City Council adopt the Findings hereinabove; adopt and amend the General Plan Land Use Diagram and approve Application No. PL2003-031SP, General Plan Amendments for a proposed specific plan northeast of Valley House Drive and Bodway Parkway (APN 47-111-030), as described in the Southeast Specific Plan General Plan Amendments attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, in its entirety. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 16th day of November, 2010. AYES: NOES: D ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AHANOTU S ARMSTRONG B9$2A,y NILSON � NORDIN Rohnert Park Planning Commission Susan Azevedo, Recordilxg Secretary EXHIBIT A SOUTHEAST SPECIFIC PLAN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS SEE EXHIBIT 1 ATTACHED TO THE STAFF REPORT