Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018/02/08 Planning Commission Agenda PacketCity of Rohnert Park Planning Commission AGENDA Thursday, February 8, 2018 6:00 P.M. 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park To Any Member of the Audience Desiring to Address the Planning Commission: For public comment on items listed or not listed on the agenda, or on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time, you may do so upon recognition from the Chairperson. PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (Adams Blanquie Borba Giudice Haydon___) DECLARATION OF ABSTENTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF POSTING OF AGENDA — Agenda has been posted in three public places: Community Center, Public Safety Building and City Hall. PUBLIC COMMENT - Persons who wish to speak to the Commission regarding an item that is not on the agenda may do so at this time. CONSENT CALENDAR - ADOPTION OF MINUTES 7.1 Approval of the Draft Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of October 12, 2017 AGENDA ITEMS 8.1 SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW - File No. PLSR17-0015 — Brianna Arth, Kimley-Horn - Consideration of Resolution No. 2017-13 approving Site Plan and Architectural Review for exterior remodel of Target located at 475 Rohnert Park Expressway (APN 143-391-043) CEQA: The project has been analyzed for compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and found to be categorically exempt as a Class I Exemption under Section 15301: Existing Facility. No further action is required pertaining to environmental review. 8.2 PUBLIC HEARING — TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - File No. PLTU18-0001 — Jim Burch JB+A — Consideration of Resolution No. 2018-14 approving the Temporary Conditional Use Permit for Southeast Specific Plan model home complex related to project signage, located south of the Canon Manor Specific Plan Area, west of Petaluma Hill Road, north of Valley House Drive, and east of Bodway Parkway CEQA: The proposed Sign program is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article 19 Categorically Exemptions Section 15311 Accessory Structures Class H (a) On -Premises signs. No further action is required pertaining to environmental review. 8.3 PUBLIC HEARING —DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN -File No. PLDP17- 0003 — Chris Grant/The Pacific Companies - Consideration of Resolution No. 2018-15 recommending to the City Council the approval of a Development Area Plan to allow a 218 -unit affordable rental housing development on property located south of Keiser Avenue and within the University District Specific Plan area (APN 159-550-007) and Resolution No. 2018-16 recommending to the City Council the approval of a Development Area Plan for Griffin's Grove Park located south of Keiser Avenue and within the University District Specific Plan area (portion of APN 159-550-008) CEQA: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Rohnert Park, as the lead agency, has conducted an environmental review of the University District Specific Plan Area, which includes the project site. The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to address the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may be associated with the planning, construction, and operation of the Project and to identify appropriate and feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to significantly reduce or avoid the impacts identified in the EIR. The City certified the Final EIR on May 23, 2006 and approved an Addendum to the Final EIR on April 8, 2014. A consistency analysis has been prepared as part of the environmental review of the proposed project. The consistency analysis concludes that the proposed Affordable Housing project is consistent with the 2006 UDSP EIR. 8.4 PUBLIC HEARING - DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN - File No. PROJ17- 0002 — Steve Miller/Signature Homes - Consideration of a Development Area Plan and Tentative Subdivision Map for development of a 6.2 acre property, creating 42 new housing units plus a 9814 square foot water quality detention parcel (APNS 045-235-009, 010, 011, 012) 9. ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10. ITEMS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE STAFF 11. ADJOURNMENT Appeals of any decisions made tonight must be received by the Planning Division within 10 days and no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 20, 2018 NOTE: If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearing(s) described in this Agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Rohnert Park at, or prior to the public hearing(s). Disabled Accommodation: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting please call (707) 588-2236. Notification 72 hours in advance of the meeting will enable the city to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.35.104 AD Title III) CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA I, Suzie Azevedo, Community Development Assistant for the City of Rohnert Park, declare that the foregoing notice and agenda for the February 8, 2018, Planning Commission Meeting of the City of Rohnert Park was posted and available for review on February 2, 2018, at Rohnert Park City Hall, 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California 94928. The agenda is available on the City of Rohnert Park's web site at www.rpefty.org. .org. Signed this 2nd day of February, 2018 at Rohnert Park, California. City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission Report DATE: February 8, 2018 ITEM NO: 8.1 AGENDA TITLE: PLSR17-0015 Site Plan and Architectural Review for the Target Exterior Fagade Remodel Project ENTITLEMENTS: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan and Architectural Review LOCATION: 475 Rohnert Park Expressway, APN 143-391-043 GP/ZONING: Commercial R/C-R: Regional Commercial APPLICANT: Brianna Arth, Kimley-Horn RECOMMENDATON Staff recommends approval of Site Plan and Architectural Review (SPAR) for the proposed Target exterior remodel project at 475 Rohnert Park Expressway. SPAR is required for the proposed exterior alterations to the existing building. SUMMARY The project site is located at 475 Rohnert Park Expressway on an approximate 8.5 -acre parcel within a commercial shopping center bordered by Rohnert Park Expressway to the north, Redwood Drive to the east, Laguna Drive to the south, and Labath Avenue to the west (Figure 1). The project proposes to remodel the exterior fagade with new signage and fagade architectural elements. No expansion or other changes are proposed to the Target commercial space, to the paved parking facilities, or the rear building truck loading bays and trash enclosure. The subject site is designated in the General Plan as Commercial -R (Regional) and is accordingly zoned C-R: Regional Commercial. Page 1 w djK ME- N wi P— .......... ANt. ----- -7- Ile BACKGROUND Surrounding Land Uses The project site is located adjacent to Joanne's Fabrics and Crafts, 99 Cents Store, and Burlington Coat Factory to the east. Across Labath Ave to the west includes Reading Cinemas, Pet Smart, Big Lots and other smaller commercial uses. North across Rohnert Park Expressway is Windsor at Redwood Creek, Goodwill Valley Furniture and other smaller commercial uses. South of the project site across Laguna Drive includes residential uses and the Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park (see Figure 2). Issues with Shopping Cart Target store carts are found throughout Rohnert Park in violation of Municipal Code Chapter 5.30 (Abandonment of Shopping Carts). Target is responsible for taking measures to prevent shopping cart leaving the premises. A condition of approval has been provided to require either a shopping cart containment system (e.g. wheel locks on individual shopping cart or a cart retrieval service). Project Details Location and Access The existing building is located along Rohnert Park Expressway set back approximately 800 feet with the rear of the building abutting the intersection of Labath Avenue and Laguna Drive. The building is located at the southern end of the parcel with vehicle access from Labath Avenue, Rohnert Park Expressway, and Redwood Drive. Access to the loading at the rear of the building is from Redwood Drive and Laguna Drive (see Figure 3). No changes are proposed to the access driveways, parking, or loading area. Page 3 Building Elevations The exterior remodel would introduce new architectural elements and articulation to the building facade using materials, textures and wall plane changes. Target's proposed design introduces new materials at the front wall in the form of red accent panels that are layered over the existing exterior wall. All four sides of the building will be repainted. A new color palette is proposed for the exterior utilizing soft grey tones with red accents. The remainder of the building exterior, including sides and rear, will be painted per the Exterior Elevation exhibit shown in Figures 4 and 5. Page 4 Sim New signage is proposed to improve the visibility and navigation for guests arriving by car, bicycle, or on foot of store. The new signage would utilize internally illuminated signs near existing sign locations. New signs are proposed to coordinate with the new building exterior and to provide brand recognition for Target, the pharmacy and online order pickup (see Figure 6). ANALYSIS General Plan The proposed project includes exterior modifications, including new signage, to an existing commercial building and would remain in compliance with the Commercial -R (Regional) General Plan land use designation of the property which is intended to provide sites for retail areas containing a wide variety of businesses, including: retail stores, eating and drinking establishments, commercial recreation, service stations, automobile sales and repair services, financial, business and personal services, hotels and motels, and educational and social services. Zoning Regulations The property is zoned C-R: Regional Commercial which is intended to allow for uses that provide goods and services that serve the community and outlying areas within an eight to twenty -mile radius. Large commercial/retail uses are permitted in the C-R zoning district as well as a range of other commercial activities. The project involves exterior modifications to an existing building and therefore there are no changes to height, setbacks, landscape areas, or parking on the site. Other Municipal Code Provisions Target is out of compliance with Chapter 5.30 (Abandonment of Shopping Carts) and staff does recommend approval of this project unless measure are in place to bring Target into compliance. Target is responsible for taking measures to prevent shopping cart leaving the premises. A Page 5 condition of approval has been provided to require either a shopping cart containment system (e.g. wheel locks on individual shopping carts) or a cart retrieval service (e.g. requiring the daily collection of shopping carts). ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project has been analyzed for compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and found to be categorically exempt as a Class 1 Exemption under Section 15301: Existing Facility. No further action is required pertaining to environmental review. Attachments Resolution 2018-13 Approving a Site Plan and Architecture Review for the exterior remodel of Target located at 475 Rohnert Park Expressway (APN 143-391-043) File No. PLSU17-0015 Exhibit A - Plan Set Exhibit B - Sign Package Exhibit C - Color Board APPROVALS: �I - �7 &u -t,, , ) �� Brett Bollinger, Planhing Ca sultana LIJ Prey Beiswenger, Pla ning Manager Page 6 )� - ,, •) V Date )- Z - Date PLANNING COMMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2018-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR EXTERIOR REMODEL OF TARGET AT 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPRESSWAY (APN 143-391-043) WHEREAS, the applicant, Brianna Arth, filed Planning Application No. PLSR17-0015 for Site Plan and Architectural Review for an exterior remodel of an existing Target commercial building, in accordance with the City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code; WHEREAS, Planning Applications No. PLSR17-0015 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, on February 8, 2018, the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Application No. PLSR17-0015 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support of or opposition to the project; and, WHEREAS, at the February 8, 2018, Planning Commission meeting, upon considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all the facts relating to Planning Application No. PLSR17-0015. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Factors Considered. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PLSR17-0015, makes the following factors, to wit: A. That the developments general appearance is compatible with existing development and enhances the surrounding neighborhood. Criteria Satisfied. The project proposes to remodel the exterior fagade with new signage and fagade architectural elements. No expansion or other changes are proposed to the Target commercial space, to the paved parking facilities, and the rear building truck loading bays and trash enclosure; therefore, the development would remain compatible with existing surrounding commercial development, assuming the issue of nuisance shopping cart is addressed. Target is currently out of compliance with Chapter 5.30 (Abandonment of Shopping Carts). Target is responsible for taking measures to prevent shopping cart leaving the premises. A condition of approval has been provided to require either a shopping cart containment system or a cart retrieval service. B. That the development incorporates a variation from adjacent on-site and off-site structures in height, bulk, and area; arrangement on the parcel; openings or breaks in the fagade facing the street; and/or the line and pitch of the roof. Criteria Satisfied. The project proposes to remodel the exterior fagade with new signage and fagade architectural elements. No expansion or other changes are proposed to the Target commercial space, to the paved parking facilities, or the rear building truck loading bays and trash enclosure. The exterior modifications to the existing commercial building would not alter the height, bulk, or area of the commercial building. Therefore, this finding is not applicable. C. That the development will be located and oriented in such a manner so as to provide pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular connections with adjacent properties, as appropriate, and avoids indiscriminate location and orientation. Criteria Satisfied. The project proposes to remodel the exterior fagade with new signage and facade architectural elements. The project involves exterior modifications to an existing building and therefore there are no changes to the building orientation, height, setbacks, landscape areas, or parking on the site. The exterior modifications to the existing commercial building would not alter the pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular connections with adjacent properties. Therefore, this finding is not applicable. Section 3. Environmental Clearance. The project has been analyzed for compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and found to be categorically exempt as a Class lExemption under Section 15301: Existing Facility. No further action is required pertaining to environmental review. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Planning Application No. PLSR17-0015 subject to the Conditions of Approval attached as Exhibit A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said action shall not be deemed final until the appeal period has expired and that the appeal period shall be ten (10) working days from the date of said action. No building permits shall be issued until the appeal period has expired, providing there are no appeals. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 8th day of February, 2018 by the City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission by the following vote: ADAMS Attest: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BLANQUIE BORBA ABSTAIN: GIUDICE HAYDON Susan Adams, Chairperson, Rohnert Park Planning Commission Susan Azevedo, Recording Secretary EXHIBIT A ADOPTED PER PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2018-13 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPRESSWAY - TARGET SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW The conditions below shall apply to the Target commercial building exterior alterations project located at 475 Rohnert Park Expressway (PLSR17-0015). General Conditions 1. The Site Plan and Architectural Review approval shall expire one year from the Planning Commission approval date, unless prior to the expiration a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion and the use is initiated, or an extension is requested and approved. 2. The facility shall comply with any and all applicable provisions of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code (RPMC) and any state or federal agency. The violation of any condition listed herein shall constitute a nuisance and a violation of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code. In conformity with Chapter 1.16 of the RPMC, a violation of the RPMC may be an infraction or a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as provided by law. In addition to criminal penalties, the City may seek injunctive relief. The Applicant agrees to pay for all attorney's fees and costs, including, but not limited to, staff time incurred by the City in obtaining injunctive relief against the Applicant as a result of a failure of the Applicant to fully perform and adhere to all of the Conditions of Approval. 3. The Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, hold harmless and release the City of Rohnert Park, its agents, officers, attorneys and employees from any claim, action or proceedings brought against any of the above, the purpose of which is to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this application or certification of the environmental document which accompanies it. This indemnification obligation shall include but not be limited to, damages, costs, expenses, attorneys', or expert witness fees that may be asserted by any person or entity, including the Applicant, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of the City, its agents, officers, attorneys or employees. 4. The Site Plan and Architectural Review approval shall expire one year from the Planning Commission approval date, unless prior to the expiration a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion and the use is initiated, or an extension is requested and approved. Shopping Cart Conditions 5. The allowance of carts outside a building or enclosed area of the Target commercial business shall comply with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Chapter 5.30 — Abandonment of Shopping Carts, including: Section 5.30.070 - Identification of shopping carts. All shopping carts used in the city shall be properly identified by the owner thereof, including the name of the local store in which such shopping cart is to be used. All persons owning shopping carts within the city for use by their customers to take outside of the buildings shall have firmly affixed thereto the owner's identification. 6. The owner is required to develop, implement and comply with an abandoned cart prevention plan. The plan must include, at a minimum, the following information: a. A procedure for providing notification to customers that removal of carts from the premises is prohibited and a violation of state and local law. This notice may be provided in the form of flyers, warnings on shopping bags, or any form of written notification that will effectively notify customers of the prohibition; b. A description of the physical measures that will be implemented to prevent the removal of carts from the premises. Physical measures may include, but are not limited to: devices on carts that prevent their removal from the premises; posting of a designated employee or security guard to deter and stop customers from removing carts from the premises, prohibiting carts outside the building of the business unless accompanied by an employee; and c. A procedure for the retrieval of abandoned carts by its employees, or proof that the owner has entered into a contract for cart retrieval services that has been approved by the Director of Development Service. Daily retrieval is required and must include the full extent of Rohnert Park city limits. 7. The owner shall submit a proposed abandoned cart prevention plan to the Director of Development Services within 60 days of the effective date of the SPAR approval, and by July 1 st of each year thereafter. The Director must approve the plan prior to the issuance of a final certificate of occupancy. 2 a w a U tn LL LU w ly LU w a N N U w J LL w w N N Ln m to Z M Q U H -9. U ["- U) W N (a N Z T W (D O O W J Y U z N O ODw tnMLn 'i N li w W a a O ++ x (n I— W - '#- _ r _ At All ROHNERT PARKEXPRESSWAY WT Ila JUNK w L �. o` a o _ . _ Q Q w 0 _p .9 141V -w It- -LAGUNA DR jV r*"ow r � °�� .^"''� .' t .. , . , ,,.,;,,'�, ,vim'"� ► � �, �` �; 4Ltam INA% 7 T T 10 'O MATCH BENJAMIN ! RIVER REFLECTION T-0852 Rohnert Park, CA: Exterior Elevation Refresh C-205 BM #HC -172 REVERE PEWTER - C-36 BM #1552 RIVER REFLECTION STRIPES AND CORNICES - EIFS C-1 RED DCLASSIC GRAY (EIFS PANELS) DCLASSIC GRAY N TK -6662-89 SILVERSMITH W/ PRIMER TK 26017 Proposed Front Elevation October 30, 2017 REPAINTED TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE HC -172 REVERE PEWTER ABOVE/1552 RIVER REFLECTION BASE T T T o) 75'-0" (N) STOREFRONT AND (E) REPAIRED FENCE PAINTED (E) BOLLARDS TO BE ENTRY DOORS, SILVER (N) EIFS C-1 RED (E) BENCH REMOVE (E) SIGN TO REMAIN C-36 RIVER REFLECTION, REPLACE REPAINTED C-1 RED &REPLACE WITH NEW SHADE FABRIC TO MATCH (N) 16'-0" BULLSEYE (N) SIGN 22'-11'2'-5" (E) SIGN TO BE O REMOVED 1 O T-0852 Rohnert Park, CA: Exterior Elevation Refresh C-205 BM #HC -172 REVERE PEWTER - C-36 BM #1552 RIVER REFLECTION STRIPES AND CORNICES - EIFS C-1 RED DCLASSIC GRAY (EIFS PANELS) DCLASSIC GRAY N TK -6662-89 SILVERSMITH W/ PRIMER TK 26017 Proposed Front Elevation October 30, 2017 T REPAINT TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE HC -1552 RIVER REFLECTION (E) BOLLARDS TO BE REPAINTED C-1 RED 0 I 75'-0" — (N) STOREFRONT AND ENTRY DOORS, SILVER 21'-0" + , (N) 16'-0" BULLSEYE E9 REPAINTED TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE HC -172 REVERE PEWTER ABOVE/1552 RIVER REFLECTION BASE C-205 BM #HC -172 REVERE PEWTER o I I C-36 BM #1552 RIVER REFLECTION STRIPES AND CORNICES (E) REPAIRED FENCE PAINTED C-36 RIVER REFLECTION, REPLACE EIFS C-1 RED SHADE FABRIC TO MATCH 2'-5" (E)SIGN TOBE D CLASSIC GRAY (EIFS PANELS) REMOVED DCLASSIC GRAY TK -6662-89 SILVERSMITH W/ PRIMER TK 26017 REPAINTED TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE HC -172 REVERE PEWTER ABOVE/1552 RIVER REFLECTION BASE — (N) EIFS C-1 RED lo (E) BENCH REMOVE (E) SIGN TO REMAIN & REPLACE WITH NEW (N) SIGN 22'-1 C-205 BM #HC -172 REVERE PEWTER o I I C-36 BM #1552 RIVER REFLECTION STRIPES AND CORNICES (E) REPAIRED FENCE PAINTED C-36 RIVER REFLECTION, REPLACE EIFS C-1 RED SHADE FABRIC TO MATCH 2'-5" (E)SIGN TOBE D CLASSIC GRAY (EIFS PANELS) REMOVED DCLASSIC GRAY TK -6662-89 SILVERSMITH W/ PRIMER TK 26017 2- (N) 8'-0" BULLSEYE (N) EIFS C-1 RED 11 Q REPAINTED TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE HC -172 REVERE PEWTER ABOVE/1552 RIVER REFLECTION BASE oll REPAINTED TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE HC -172 REVERE PEWTER ABOVE/1552 RIVER REFLECTION BASE lo 3'-4" (E) RAILINGS AND EXTERIOR DOORS PAINTED TO MATCH C-36 RIVER REFLECTION 2 - 3'-10" REPAINT TO MATCH BENJAMIN 8'-11" MOORE HC -1552 RIVER REFLECTION (E) REPAIRED FENCE PAINTED C-36 RIVER REFLECTION, REPLACE (N) EIFS C-1 RED SHADE FABRIC TO MATCH (N) 8'-0" BULLSEYE FT M o EO bo (N) EIFS C-1 RED M O _ v O p - W O REPAINTED TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE HC -172 REVERE PEWTER ABOVE/1552 RIVER REFLECTION BASE 2- (N) 8'-0" BULLSEYE (N) EIFS C-1 RED 11 Q REPAINTED TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE HC -172 REVERE PEWTER ABOVE/1552 RIVER REFLECTION BASE oll lo 3'-4" (E) RAILINGS AND EXTERIOR DOORS PAINTED TO MATCH C-36 RIVER REFLECTION 3'-10" REPAINT TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE HC -1552 RIVER REFLECTION 0 0 T-0852 Rohnert Park, CA: Exterior Elevation Refresh (N) EIFS C-1 RED o in EO 20EO M Proposed Elevations October 30, 2017 PHOTOGRAPHIC SITE PLAN N. I S. FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 Manufacturing Facilities: Oceanside, CA - Euless, TX- Jacksonville, TX Delaware, OH - Racine, WI Office Locations: Oceanside, CA - Las Vegas, NV - Laughlin, AZ Idaho Falls, ID - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Antonio, TX Houston, TX - Corpus Christi, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY - Knoxville, TN - Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Willowbrook, IL - Tunica, MS - Atlanta, GA Tampa, FL - Daytona Beach, FL - Orlando, FL Building Quality Signage Since 1901 Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/CHC Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match Client Approval/Date: Landlord Approval/Date: Account Project manager: SANDRA RAMI Drawn By: ROBERTO MIJARES/JDR O1 Underwriters O ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. LISTED Ur Laboratories Inc. nEC COMPONENTS ANDSHALLMEET ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE TO COMPLY WITH U.L. 98 AND ARTICLE 6 n OF THE N.E.C. STAN DA R O S, INCLUDING THE PROPER OF AND BONDING OF ALL SIGNS. EXISTING SIGN SCHEDULE EXISTING RED 6'-0"BULLSEYE LOGO 15'-0" TARGET LETTERS 174.7 SQ. FT. ii■i QUANTITY: ONE (1) REMOVE AND DISPOSE NORTH Elevation - Store Front EXISTING RED 2'-5" CVS PHARMACY LETTERS 57.08 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: ONE (1) NORTH Elevation - Store Front A EXISTING RED 3'-0" BULLSEYE LOGO 9.0 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: ONE (1) REMOVE AND DISPOSE NORTHEAST Elevation - Store Front EXIST'G TOTAL BLDG. SIGNAGE: 240.78 S0.FT. PROPOSED NEW SIGN SCHEDULE A NEW 16'-0" WHITE BULLSEYE LOGO 201.0 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: ONE (1) NORTH Elevation - Store Front �Z NEW 14" RED ORDER PICK-UP CHANNEL LETTERS 24.59 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: ONE (1) NORTH Elevation - Store Front EXIST. 2'-5" CVS PHARMACY LETTERS 57.08 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: ONE (1) NORTH Elevation - Store Front A NEW 8'-0" WHITE BULLSEYE LOGO 50.2 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: ONE (1) WEST Elevation - Right Side A NEW 8'-0" WHITE BULLSEYE LOGO 50.2 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: ONE (1) SOUTH Elevation - Rear PROPOSED TOTAL BLDG. SIGNAGE: 383.07 SQ. FT. Project / Location: G)TARGET Store Number: T0852 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPY W ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 Job Number: 23-44719-10 Date: OCTOBER 31, 2017 Sheet Number: 1 Of 10 Design Number: 23-44719-10-R1 This original drawing is provided as part of a planned project and is not to be exhibited, copied or reproduced without the written p e r m i s s i o n o f Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC or its authorized agent. ©FHSC CS a C"? A171 011 OEXISTING NORTH ELEVATION - STORE FRONT Scale: 1/3211=1'-01' EXISTING CONDITION - NORTH ELEVATION I STORE FRONT NTS FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/UHG Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Manufacturing Facilities: Oceanside, CA - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX Delaware, OH - Racine, WI Orrice Locations: Oceanside, CA- Las Vegas, NV - Laughlin, AZ Idaho Falls, ID - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Aotonio, TX Houston, TX - Corpus Christi, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY- Knoxville, TN -Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match Willowbrook, It - Tunica, MS -Atlanta, GA Tampa, FL - Daytona Beach, FL - Orlando, FL Client Approval/Date: Building Quality Signage Since 1901 Landlord Approval/Date: Account Project Manager: Drawn By: ROBERTO MIJARES/JDR nu. Underwriters O ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. USTED nec COMPONENTS AND SHALL MEET Laboratories Inc. f ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE TO COMPLY WITH U.L. 48 AND ARTICLE 600 OF THE N.E.C. STANDARDS, INCLUDING THE PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF ALL SIGNS. Project / Location: I@TARGET Store Number: T0852 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPY W ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 Job Number: 23-44719-10 Dare: OCTOBER 31, 2017 Sheet Number: G Of 10 Design Number: 23-44719-10-R1 This original drawing is provided as part of a planned project and is not to be exhibited, copied or reproduced without the written p e r m i s s i o n o f Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC or its authorized agent. ©FHSC FIELD SURVEY REQUIRED E 341-0" 61-011 271-411 I I o I I I I ---- - --- --- - ---- ---' w EXISTING 72" (6'4") BULLSEYE LOGO & 60" (5'-0") TARGET LETTERS 28.2 + 146.5 = 174.7 S.F. ONE (1) EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION - STORE FRONT SCALE: 3/16"=11-0" SCOPE OF WORK: REMOVE AND DISPOSE 22'-10" 31-111 121-21 /4" m: IV CVS Pharmacy !� EXISTING 29" (2'-5") CVS PHARMACY LETTERS 57.08 S.F. ONE (1) EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION - STORE FRONT SCALE: 1/4"=14" SCOPE OF WORK: REMOVE AND DISPOSE FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/CHC Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Manufacturing Facilities: Oceanside, CA - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX Delaware, OH - Racine, WI Office Locations: Oceanside, CA- Las Vegas, NV - Laughlin, AZ Idaho Falls, ID - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Aotonio, TX Houston, TX - Corpus Christi, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY- Knoxville, TN -Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match Willowbrook, It - Tunica, MS -Atlanta, GA m Tapa, FL - Daytona Beach, FL - Orlando, FL Client Approval/Date: Building Quality Signage Since 1901 Landlord Approval/Date: Account Rep: BOYD H Project Manager: SANDI Drawn By: ROBERTO M 31-011 I I I I I I I • I 0 M I I I I I I I A EXISTING 36" (3'-0") BULLSEYE LOGO 9 S.F. ONE (1) EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION - STORE FRONT SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" SCOPE OF WORK: REMOVE AND DISPOSE Project / Location: REZ QTARGET JDR Job Number: 23-44719-10 Dare: OCTOBER 31, 2017 U Underwriters rl@C COMPONENTo USEND LIALLMEET Store Number: T0852 Sheet Number: 3 of 10 Laboratories Inc. f ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPY W ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE TO .COMPLY WITH U.L. AND ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 Desi n Number: ARTICLE 600 OF THE N.E.C. STANDARDS. IN CLU DING g 23-44719-10-R1 THE PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF ALL SIGNS. This original drawing is provided as part of a planned project and is not to be exhibited, copied or reproduced without the written p e r m i s s i o n o f Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC or its authorized agent. ©FHSC 0 0 12'-8" \ 16'-0" 3/4" 75'-0" OPROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION - STORE FRONT Scale: 1/32"=1'-0" 0 r` ± 417'-2" + '11P_Zu M 2'-5' O = 00 T 22-10" r2,4, 0 N 0 0 OPROPOSED WEST ELEVATION - RIGHT SIDE Scale: 1/32"=1'-0" FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 Manufacturing Facilities:Account Oceanside, CA - Euless, TX - Ja<l—riville, TX23-44719-10 awa Delre, OH - Racine, WI Ofnce Locations: Oceanside, CA - Las Vegas, NV -Laughlin, AZ Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/CHG Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Rep: BOYD HIPPENSTIEL Project / Location: G)TARGET Job Number: Project Project Manager: SANDRA RAMIREZ I Date: OCTO 31 2017 � Idaho Falls, ID - Euless,TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Antonio, TX Drawn By: ROBERTO MIJARES/JDR Houston, TX - Corpus Chnsti, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY- Knoxville, TN -Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match. Store Number: T0852 A Sheet Number: 4 Of 10 nu. Underwriters i ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. LISTED Willowbrook,IL- Tunica, MS -Atlanta, GA Tampa,FL - Daytona Beach, FL -Orlando, FL Building Quality Signage Since 1901 Client Approval/Date: Landlord Approval/Date: DSHALL EETT Laboratories Inc.nEC COMPONENT AND ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE TO COMP LYTANDAR S, D.L. U AND NG TH PROPER°� OUNDINGEANDS.—D NG OF'ALL LSIGNS. 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPY W ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 Design Number: g 23-44719-10-R1 This original drawing is provided as part of a planned project and is not to be exhibited, copied or reproduced without the written p e r m i s s i o n o f Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC or its authorized agent. ©FHSC 25'-0" 3'-811-k 8'-0" 13'-4" OPROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION - REAR Scale: 1/32"=1'-0" ®PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION - LEFT SIDE Scale: 1/32"=1'-0" FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 ± 425'-4" ± 335'-3" 0 T-4" T-10" C? I? � bo boo 60 COM Manufacturing Facilities: O[eansitle, CA -Euless, TX-ladaonville, TX Delaware, Loc Racine, WI OfLas Vegas, ons: Oceanside, CA - Las Vegas, NV -Laughlin, AZ Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/CHc Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Account Rep: BOYD HIPPENSTIEL Project / Location: G)TARGET �Ob NUmbeC 23-44719-10 Project Manager: j g SANDRA RAMIREZ OCTOBER 31 2017 Date: � Idaho Falls, ID - Euless,TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Antonio, TX Drawn By: ROBERTO MIJARES/JDR Houston, TX - Corpus Chnsti, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY- Knoxville, TN -Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match. Store Number: T0852 Sheet Number: 5 Of 10 nu. Underwriters i ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. LISTED Willowbrook,IL- Tunica, MS -Atlanta, GA Tampa,FL - Daytona Beach, FL -Orlando, FL Building Quality Signage Since 1901 Client Approval/Date: Landlord Approval/Date: DSHALL EETT Laboratories Inc.nEC COMPONENT AND ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE TO COMP LYTANDAR S, D.L. U AND NG TH PROPER°� OUNDINGEANDS.—D NG OF'ALL LSIGNS. 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPY W ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 Design Number: g 23-44719-10-R1 This original drawing is provided as part of a planned project and is not to be exhibited, copied or reproduced without the written p e r m i s s i o n o f Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC or its authorized agent. ©FHSC B DE� I I I I i , I , I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I __________� J----------- J-------- I I I i , I , I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I t I I � i I I i I I I I I I I I � I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 , I , I I I I I I I A F�G ACRYLIC FACED INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED "BULLSEYE" MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL CHANNEL LOGO AS SHOWN AND NOTED MATERIAL FINISH COLORS 1-1 WHITE Returns 7328WH ❑AITE Acrylic crylic III WHITE Faces Retainer/Trim-Cap Sloan White ❑LED Illumination FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 Manufacturing Facilities: Oceanside, CA - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX Delaware, OH - Racine, WI Office Locations: Oceanside, CA- Las Vegas, NV - Laughlin, AZ Idaho Falls, ID - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Antonio, TX Houston, TX - Corpus Christi, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY - Knoxville, IN - Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Willowbrook, IL - Tunica, MS -Atlanta, GA Tampa, FL - Daytona Beach, FL - Orlando, FL Building C2uality Signage Since 1901 611 SPACE MAXIMUM 1" MINIMUM 1/2" 14,11 IlTl 14►dl Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/CHC Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match Client Approval/Date: I Landlord Approval/Date: SPACE MAXIMUM 1" MINIMUM 1/2" 6" WALL 7 1 7_ .080 ALUMINUM FILLER INTERIOR PAINTED: WHITE .063 ALUMINUM RETAINER MINIMUM .090 ALUMINUM BACK PIGMENTED ACRYLIC FACES SLOAN LED 1/2" ELECTRICAL BEYOND SIGN BY INSTALLER. INSTALLER TO PROPERLY SEAL WALL. SEALER: BASF-MasterSeal NP 150 ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE (INCLUDING SPACERS) TO BE SUPPLIED BY: INSTALLER MINIMUM 3/8" STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING HARDWARE (2) - WEEP HOLES PER LOW SPOT CLASS 2 SECONDARIES TO DISTRIBUTION BOARD TO BE RUN THROUGH CONDUIT SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER AND WIRED BY INSTALLER. DISTRIBUTION BOARD AND POWER SUPPLIES SUPPLIED BY FEDERAL HEATH SIGN CO. Total: 0.0 Amps EXISTING ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCK -ABLE DISCONNECT SWITCH BY OWNER -WIRED BY ELECTRICIAN. (1 PER CIRCUIT) J -BOX BY INSTALLER 4 aPOWER DISTRIBUTION BOARD– BY. FEDERAL HEATH H� 12 V CLASS TWO POWER SUPPLY, SUPPLIED BY; a° FEDERAL HEATH MOUNTED BY: SUB -CONTRACTOR L LOGO/WALL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE UP (Generic) (1 ) 120V 20A Circuit Required. ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL BE DEDICATED TO SIGNS (INCLUDING GROUND AND NEUTRAL) AND SHALL NOT BE SHARED WITH OTHER LOADS. Account Project Manager: Drawn By: ROBERTO MIJARES Project / Location: CUSTOMER TO PROVIDE DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUITS FOR SIGNS ONLY PER NEC CODE 600.5 ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL BE DEDICATED TO SIGNS (INCLUDING GROUND AND NEUTRAL) AND SHALL NOT BE SHARED WITH OTHER LOADS. PROPERLY SIZED GROUND WIRE THAT CAN BE TRACED BACK TO BREAKER PANEL IS REQUIRED. INSTALLER REQUIREMENTS ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE, SECONDARY WIRING AND CONDUITS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR. ALL PENETRATIONS IN THE WALL ARE TO BE SEALED WITH SILICONE AND TO BE WATERTIGHT. ANY DEVIATION FROM FEDERAL HEATH REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN DAMAGE TO OR IMPROPER OPERATION OF SIGNAGE, CAUSING DELAYS AND ADDITIONAL COSTS. REZ QTARGET JDR nu. Underwriters rt@C CELECTRICAL OMPONENTO USEND UALLMEET Store Number: T0852 Laboratories Inc. f ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPY W ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE TO COMPLY WITH U.L. 48 AND ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 ARTICLE 600 OF THE N.E.C. STANDARDS. INCLUDING THE PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF ALL SIGNS. NEW & REMODEL CONSTRUCTION ADEQUATE BEHIND THE WALL BACKING AND ACCESS IS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW SIGNAGE. CUSTOMER TO FORWARD APPROVED SIGNAGE DRAWINGS TO THE ON SITE CONTACT TO INSURE THAT THE REQUIRED PROVISIONS ARE MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO THE SIGN INSTALLATION. INSTALLER REQUIREMENTS FOR EIFS WALLS IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ANY WALL SPACERS REQUIRED TO KEEP EIFS WALL MATERIAL FROM BEING COMPACTED DURING INSTALLATION OF ANY MOUNTING BOLTS REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE. GENERAL NOTE •INSTALLER SHALL VERIFY WALL CONDITION IN THE FIELD. • TYPE, SIZE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS TO BE DETERMINED. •ALL BOLT HOLES TO BE DRILLED OR PUNCHED. :ALL ALL ALUMINUM FROM STEEL. Job Number: 23-44719-10 Date: OCTOBER 31, 2017 Sheet Number: 6 Of 10 Design Number: 23-44719-10-R1 This original drawing is provided as part of a planned project and is not to be exhibited, copied or reproduced without the written p e r m i s s i o n o f Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC or its authorized agent. ©FHSC B ------------------------ ---------------------------, I I orcler CA ici --------------------------------------------up, i ACRYLIC FACED INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS whip MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL CHANNEL LETTERS AS SHOWN AND NOTED kh SIGN TYPE A i C SQ.FT.QTY OPU14-REMOTE-R 1'-2" 1 12'-10" 17-11" 24.59 1 1 MATERIAL FINISH COLORS BOYD H ■ Returns MP# 8 LOSS) G ■ (FULL GLOSS) Faces 2793 LD Red Modified Acrylic (Altuglas or Equiv.) Red ■ Trimcap/Retainer ■Sloan Red LED Illumination FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 gin END VIEW Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/CHC Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Manufacturing Facilities: Oceanside, CA - EUII s , TX - Jacksonville, TX Delaware, OH - Racine, WI Office Locations: Oceanside, CA- Las Vegas, NV - Laughlin, AZ Idaho Falls, ID - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Antonio, TX Houston, TX - Corpus Chnsti, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY- Knoxville, TN -Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match Willowbrook, IL - Tunica, MS -Atlanta, GA Tampa, FL - Daytona Beach, FL - Orlando, FL Client Approval/Date: Building Ouality Signage Since 1901 Landlord Approval/Date: .040 ALUMINUM FILLER PRE -FINISHED ALUMINUM 1" TRIM CAP MINIMUM .063 ALUMINUM BACK PIGMENTED ACRYLIC FACES SLOAN LED Yz' ELECTRICAL BEYOND SIGN BY INSTALLER. INSTALLER TO PROPERLY SEAL WALL. SEALER: BASF-MasterSeal NP 150 ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE (INCLUDING SPACERS) TO BE SUPPLIED BY: INSTALLER MINIMUM 3/8" STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING HARDWARE WEEP HOLES PER LOW SPOT CLASS 2 SECONDARIES TO DISTRIBUTION BOARD TO BE RUN THROUGH CONDUIT SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER AND WIRED BY INSTALLER. DISTRIBUTION BOARD AND POWER SUPPLIES SUPPLIED BY FEDERAL HEATH SIGN CO. Account Rep: BOYD H Project Manager: SANDI Drawn By: ROBERTO M Total: 0.0 Amps (1 ) 120V 20A Circuit Required. ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL BE DEDICATED TO SIGNS (INCLUDING GROUND AND NEUTRAL) AND SHALL NOT BE SHARED WITH OTHER LOADS. Project / Location: 5 �SPACE MAXIMUM 1" WALMINIMUM ',/211 EXISTING ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCK -ABLE DISCONNECT SWITCH BY OWNER -WIRED BY ELECTRICIAN. (1 PER CIRCUIT) �J-BOX BY INSTALLER POWER DISTRIBUTION BOARD BY: FEDERAL HEATH 12 V CLASS TWO POWER SUPPLY, SUPPLIED BY; FEDERAL HEATH MOUNTED BY: SUB -CONTRACTOR LOGO/LETTER WALL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE (Generic) CUSTOMER TO PROVIDE DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUITS FOR SIGNS ONLY PER NEC CODE 600.5 ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL BE DEDICATED TO SIGNS (INCLUDING GROUND AND NEUTRAL) AND SHALL NOT BE SHARED WITH OTHER LOADS. PROPERLY SIZED GROUND WIRE THAT CAN BE TRACED BACK TO BREAKER PANEL IS REQUIRED. INSTALLER REQUIREMENTS ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE, SECONDARY WIRING AND CONDUITS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR. ALL PENETRATIONS IN THE WALL ARE TO BE SEALED WITH SILICONE AND TO BE WATERTIGHT. ANY DEVIATION FROM FEDERAL HEATH REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN DAMAGE TO OR IMPROPER OPERATION OF SIGNAGE, CAUSING DELAYS AND ADDITIONAL COSTS. REZ QTARGET JDR U Underwriters ELECTRICAL TO USE UAL. LISTED rt@C COMPONENTS AND SHALL MEET Store Number: T0852 L Laboratories Inc. f ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPY W ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE TO COMPLY WITH U.L. 48 AND ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 ARTICLE 600 OF THE N.E.C. STANDARDS. INCLUDING THE PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF ALL SIGNS. NEW & REMODEL CONSTRUCTION ADEQUATE BEHIND THE WALL BACKING AND ACCESS IS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW SIGNAGE. CUSTOMER TO FORWARD APPROVED SIGNAGE DRAWINGS TO THE ON SITE CONTACT TO INSURE THAT THE REQUIRED PROVISIONS ARE MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO THE SIGN INSTALLATION. INSTALLER REQUIREMENTS FOR EIFS WALLS IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ANY WALL SPACERS REQUIRED TO KEEP EIFS WALL MATERIAL FROM BEING COMPACTED DURING INSTALLATION OF ANY MOUNTING BOLTS REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE. GENERAL NOTE •INSTALLER SHALL VERIFY WALL CONDITION IN THE FIELD. • TYPE, SIZE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS TO BE DETERMINED. •ALL BOLT HOLES TO BE DRILLED OR PUNCHED. :ALL ALL ALUMINUM FROM STEEL. Job Number: 23-44719-10 Date: OCTOBER 31, 2017 Sheet Number: I Of 10 Design Number: 23-44719-10-131 This original drawing is provided as part of a planned project and is not to be exhibited, copied or reproduced without the written p e r m i s s i o n o f Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC or its authorized agent. ©FHSC A (IIVIt) 10 E .040 ALUMINUM FILLER PRE -FINISHED ALUMINUM 1"TRIM CAP pnarmacy INIMUM .063 ALUMINUM BACK ACRYLIC FACED INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL CHANNEL LOGO & LETTERS AS SHOWN AND NOTED MATERIAL FINISH COLORS DISTRIBUTION BOARD— MP# 2793 LD Red ■ (FU GLOSS) G ■ (AN gkas Acrylic or Equiv.) Returns Faces ■Red Trimcap/Retainer ■ LEDn Red Illumination FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 r'u FIND VIEW Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/CHC Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Manufacturing Facilities: Oceanside, CA - EUII s , TX - Jacksonville, TX Delaware, OH - Racine, WI Office Locations: Oceanside, CA- Las Vegas, rsV - Laughlin, AZ Idaho Falls, ID - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Antonio, TX Houston, TX - Corpus Chnsti, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY- Knoxville, TN -Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match Willowbrook, IL - Tunica, MS -Atlanta, GA Tampa, FL - Daytona Beach, FL - Orlando, FL Client Approval/Date: Building Ouality Signage Since 1901 Landlord Approval/Date: Account Project Manager: PIGMENTED ACRYLIC FACES SLOAN LED Yzl ELECTRICAL BEYOND SIGN BYINSTALLER. INSTALLER TO PROPERLY SEAL WALL. SEALER: BASF-MasterSeal NP 150 ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE (INCLUDING SPACERS) TO BE SUPPLIED BY: INSTALLER MINIMUM 3/8" STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING HARDWARE WEEP HOLES PER LOW SPOT CLASS 2 SECONDARIES TO DISTRIBUTION BOARD TO BE RUN THROUGH CONDUIT SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER AND WIRED BY INSTALLER. DISTRIBUTION BOARD AND POWER SUPPLIES SUPPLIED BY FEDERAL HEATH SIGN CO. Total: 0.0 Amps (1 ) 120V 20A Circuit Required. ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL BE DEDICATED TO SIGNS (INCLUDING GROUND AND NEUTRAL) AND SHALL NOT BE SHARED WITH OTHER LOADS. Drawn By: ROBERTO MIJARES/JDR nu. Underwriters O ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. USTED COMND SHALL MEET Laboratories Inc. ftEC ALL N.E.C.NTS STANDARDS ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE TO COMPLY WITH U.L. 48 AND ARTICLE 600 OF THE N.E.C. STANDARDS. INCLUDING THE PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF ALL SIGNS. Project / Location: SPACE MAXIMUM 1" 5 1,—WALLMINIMUM 1/2" ., 0 0 EXISTING ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCK -ABLE DISCONNECT SWITCH BY OWNER -WIRED BY ELECTRICIAN. 4��' Dv(1PER CIRCUIT) ° D° �J-BOX BYINSTALLER 4 ,dPOWER DISTRIBUTION BOARD— BY: FEDERAL HEATH � 4 12 V CLASS TWO POWER SUPPLY, SUPPLIED BY; ° FEDERAL HEATH ,a 4 MOUNTED BY: SUB -CONTRACTOR LOGO/LETTER WALL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE (Generic) CUSTOMER TO PROVIDE DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUITS FOR SIGNS ONLY PER NEC CODE 600.5 ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL BE DEDICATED TO SIGNS (INCLUDING GROUND AND NEUTRAL) AND SHALL NOT BE SHARED WITH OTHER LOADS. PROPERLY SIZED GROUND WIRE THAT CAN BE TRACED BACK TO BREAKER PANEL IS REQUIRED. INSTALLER REQUIREMENTS ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE, SECONDARY WIRING AND CONDUITS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR. ALL PENETRATIONS IN THE WALL ARE TO BE SEALED WITH SILICONE AND TO BE WATERTIGHT. ANY DEVIATION FROM FEDERAL HEATH REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN DAMAGE TO OR IMPROPER OPERATION OF SIGNAGE, CAUSING DELAYS AND ADDITIONAL COSTS. I@TARGET Store Number: T0852 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPY W ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 NEW & REMODEL CONSTRUCTION ADEQUATE BEHIND THE WALL BACKING AND ACCESS IS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW SIGNAGE. CUSTOMER TO FORWARD APPROVED SIGNAGE DRAWINGS TO THE ON SITE CONTACT TO INSURE THAT THE REQUIRED PROVISIONS ARE MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO THE SIGN INSTALLATION. INSTALLER REQUIREMENTS FOR EIFS WALLS IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ANY WALL SPACERS REQUIRED TO KEEP EIFS WALL MATERIAL FROM BEING COMPACTED DURING INSTALLATION OF ANY MOUNTING BOLTS REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE. GENERAL NOTE • INSTALLER SHALL VERIFY WALL CONDITION IN THE FIELD. • TYPE, SIZE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS TO BE DETERMINED. :ALL BOLT HOLES TO BE DRILLED OR PUNCHED. ISOLATE ALL ALUMINUM FROM STEEL. Job Number: 23-44719-10 Dare: OCTOBER 31, 2017 Sheet Number: 8 Of 10 Design Number: 23-44719-10-R1 This original drawing is provided as part of a planned project and is not to be exhibited, copied or reproduced without the written p e r m i s s i o n o f Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC or its authorized agent. ©FHSC B ©ACRYLIC FACED INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED 11BULLSEYE° VAW MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL CHANNEL LOGO AS SHOWN AND NOTED FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 Manufacturing Facilities: Oceanside, CA- Euless, TX -Jacksonville, TX Delaware, OH - Racine, WI Office Locations: Oceanside, CA - Las Vegas, NV - Laughlin, AZ Idaho Falls, ID - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Antonio, TX Houston, TX - Corpus Christi, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY - KrImIlle, IN - Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Willowbrook, It - Tunica, MS -Atlanta, GA Tampa, FL - Daytona Beach, FL - Orlando, FL Building C2uality Signage Since 1901 611 n1SPACE MAXIMUM 1" MINIMUM 1/2" FNn MFW Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/CHC Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match Client Approval/Date: Landlord Approval/Date: SPACE MAXIMUM 1" MINIMUM 1/2" 6" 7-17 WA LL� 080 ALUMINUM FILLER INTERIOR PAINTED: WHITE .063 ALUMINUM RETAINER MINIMUM .090 ALUMINUM BACK PIGMENTED ACRYLIC FACES SLOAN LED 1/2" ELECTRICAL BEYOND SIGN BY INSTALLER. INSTALLER TO PROPERLY SEAL WALL. SEALER: BASF-MasterSeal NP 150 ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE (INCLUDING SPACERS) TO BE SUPPLIED BY: INSTALLER MINIMUM 3/8" STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING HARDWARE (2) - WEEP HOLES PER LOW SPOT CLASS 2 SECONDARIES TO DISTRIBUTION BOARD TO BE RUN THROUGH CONDUIT SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER AND WIRED BY INSTALLER. DISTRIBUTION BOARD AND POWER SUPPLIES SUPPLIED BY FEDERAL HEATH SIGN CO. Total: 0.0 Amps EXISTING ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCK -ABLE DISCONNECT MATERIAL FINISH COLORS ❑WHITE Returns 7328 ATLAS [:]WHITE❑ ❑ACUG Faces Retainer/Trim-Cap nWhite LED Illumination FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 Manufacturing Facilities: Oceanside, CA- Euless, TX -Jacksonville, TX Delaware, OH - Racine, WI Office Locations: Oceanside, CA - Las Vegas, NV - Laughlin, AZ Idaho Falls, ID - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Antonio, TX Houston, TX - Corpus Christi, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY - KrImIlle, IN - Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Willowbrook, It - Tunica, MS -Atlanta, GA Tampa, FL - Daytona Beach, FL - Orlando, FL Building C2uality Signage Since 1901 611 n1SPACE MAXIMUM 1" MINIMUM 1/2" FNn MFW Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/CHC Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match Client Approval/Date: Landlord Approval/Date: SPACE MAXIMUM 1" MINIMUM 1/2" 6" 7-17 WA LL� 080 ALUMINUM FILLER INTERIOR PAINTED: WHITE .063 ALUMINUM RETAINER MINIMUM .090 ALUMINUM BACK PIGMENTED ACRYLIC FACES SLOAN LED 1/2" ELECTRICAL BEYOND SIGN BY INSTALLER. INSTALLER TO PROPERLY SEAL WALL. SEALER: BASF-MasterSeal NP 150 ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE (INCLUDING SPACERS) TO BE SUPPLIED BY: INSTALLER MINIMUM 3/8" STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING HARDWARE (2) - WEEP HOLES PER LOW SPOT CLASS 2 SECONDARIES TO DISTRIBUTION BOARD TO BE RUN THROUGH CONDUIT SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER AND WIRED BY INSTALLER. DISTRIBUTION BOARD AND POWER SUPPLIES SUPPLIED BY FEDERAL HEATH SIGN CO. Total: 0.0 Amps EXISTING ELECTRICAL PANEL 4 LOCK -ABLE DISCONNECT DISTRIBUTION BOARD — SWITCH BY OWNER -WIRED BY ELECTRICIAN. (1 PER CIRCUIT) J -BOX BY INSTALLER 4 aPOWER DISTRIBUTION BOARD — BY. FEDERAL HEATH Ymau� 12 V CLASS TWO POWER SUPPLY, SUPPLIED BY; FEDERAL HEATH ,a a° MOUNTED BY: SUB -CONTRACTOR 01111110A LOGO/WALL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NW (Generic) (1 ) 120V 20A Circuit Required. ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL BE DEDICATED TO SIGNS (INCLUDING GROUND AND NEUTRAL) AND SHALL NOT BE SHARED WITH OTHER LOADS. Account Project Manager: Drawn By: ROBERTO MIJARES/JDR O1 Underwriters O ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. LISTEDU` Laboratories Inc. ftCOMPONENTS ANMEET ALL N.E.C. STANDTAND ARDS ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE TO COMPLY WITH U.L. 48 AND ARTICLE 600 OF THE N.E.C. STANDARDS. INCLUDING THE PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF ALL SIGNS. Project / Location: CUSTOMER TO PROVIDE DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUITS FOR SIGNS ONLY PER NEC CODE 600.5 ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL BE DEDICATED TO SIGNS (INCLUDING GROUND AND NEUTRAL) AND SHALL NOT BE SHARED WITH OTHER LOADS. PROPERLY SIZED GROUND WIRE THAT CAN BE TRACED BACK TO BREAKER PANEL IS REQUIRED. INSTALLER REQUIREMENTS ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE, SECONDARY WIRING AND CONDUITS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR. ALL PENETRATIONS IN THE WALL ARE TO BE SEALED WITH SILICONE AND TO BE WATERTIGHT. ANY DEVIATION FROM FEDERAL HEATH REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN DAMAGE TO OR IMPROPER OPERATION OF SIGNAGE, CAUSING DELAYS AND ADDITIONAL COSTS. I@TARGET Store Number: T0852 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPY W ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 NEW & REMODEL CONSTRUCTION ADEQUATE BEHIND THE WALL BACKING AND ACCESS IS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW SIGNAGE. CUSTOMER TO FORWARD APPROVED SIGNAGE DRAWINGS TO THE ON SITE CONTACT TO INSURE THAT THE REQUIRED PROVISIONS ARE MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO THE SIGN INSTALLATION. INSTALLER REQUIREMENTS FOR EIFS WALLS IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ANY WALL SPACERS REQUIRED TO KEEP EIFS WALL MATERIAL FROM BEING COMPACTED DURING INSTALLATION OF ANY MOUNTING BOLTS REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE. GENERAL NOTE •INSTALLER SHALL VERIFY WALL CONDITION IN THE FIELD. • TYPE, SIZE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS TO BE DETERMINED. •ALL BOLT HOLES TO BE DRILLED OR PUNCHED. :ALL ALL ALUMINUM FROM STEEL. Job Number: 23-44719-10 Date: OCTOBER 31, 2017 Sheet Number: 9 Of 10 Design Number: 23-44719-10-131 This original drawing is provided as part of a planned project and is not to be exhibited, copied or reproduced without the written p e r m i s s i o n o f Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC or its authorized agent. ©FHSC 21-211 TYPICAL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS SHOWN, SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER - TO BE UL LISTED AND APPROVED PER NEC 2005 NEC 600-4, 600-3, 21-011 FBS 4505-4 & DESIGNED TO U.L. 48 PER F.S. 553-19. BUSHING PROVIDED BY SIGN INSTALLER. CLASS 2 12VDC 120/240 SECONDARY WIRES 125 ALUMINUM PAN POWER DISTRIBUTION BOARD (PDB) WITH 3/8" DIA. HOLES FOR MOUNTING BY FEDERAL HEATH SIGN. SLOAN POWER SUPPLIES BY FEDERAL HEATH SIGN. INSTALLED TO BOARD BY SIGN INSTALLER. ELECTRICAL ( 2'-0" ) WHIP TWHN #12 WITH TYPICAL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS SHOWN, SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER - TO BE UL LISTED AND APPROVED PER NEC 2005 NEC 600-4, 600-3, FBS 4505-4 & CV CV Il` ti • DESIGNED TO U,L. 48 PER F.S. 553-19. I 120 V ON/OFF DISCONNECT, CONDUIT PLAN VIEW (Power Distribution Board) (Typical) AND PRIMARY TO PDB INSTALLED scale 1 1/2"=1'-0" AND PROVIDED BY G.C. ELECTRICIAN. SCOPE OF WORK: FEDERAL HEATH SIGN TO MANUFACTURE A "POWER DISTRIBUTION BOARD" - ( PDB). TO BE .125 ALUMINUM BREAK FORMED PANEL 1/2" DEEP. PDB TO HAVE 3/8" MOUNTING HOLES PRE- DRILLED. INSTALLER TO MOUNT LETTERS TO EXTERIOR WALL AND RUN SECONDARY LEADS IN CONDUIT THROUGH WALL INTO A HANDI-BOX. CONDUIT THROUGH WALL TO BE SEALED FROM WEATHER WITH APPROPRIATE SEALANT SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER. INSTALLER TO WIRE ALL SECONDARY JUMPS TO CORRESPONDING LETTERS INSIDE BUILDING. INSTALLER TO WIRE SECONDARY LEADS TO POWER DISTRIBUTION BOARD THROUGH CONDUIT. INSTALLER TO COORDINATE LOCATION OF POWER DISTRIBUTION BOARD WITH TARGET ON SITE REPRESENTATIVE PER (E-8 SITE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS). INSTALLER TO MOUNT PDB WHERE REQUIRED. PDB MAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM SIGNAGE IN ANY ONE DIRECTION IS 150 FEET. PDB TO BE MOUNTED USING ADEQUATE HARDWARE SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER. ELECTRICIAN IS TO SUPPLY AND RUN PRIMARY, CONDUIT AND DISCONNECT SWITCH TO PDB AND MAKE FINAL CONNECTION. ALL WORK TO BE DONE PER NEC, UL -48 AND LOCAL CODES. FEDERAL HEATH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS www.FederalHeath.com 4602 North Avenue Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 941-0715 Fax (760) 941-0719 Manufacturing Facilities: Oceanside, CA - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX Delaware, OH - Racine, WI Orrice Locations: Oceanside, CA- Las Vegas, NV - Laughlin, AZ Idaho Falls, ID - Euless, TX - Jacksonville, TX - San Antonio, TX Houston, TX - Corpus Christi, TX - Indianapolis, IN Louisville, KY - Knoxville, TN - Grafton, WI - Delaware, OH Willowbrook, IL - TUnka, MS -Atlanta, GA Tampa, FL - Daytona Beach, FL - Orlando, FL Building Quality Signage Since 1901 Revisions: R1-12-01-17 VA/UHC Update elevations, move placement of Sign A and remove notes on Sign A, E & F. Colors Depicted In This Rendering May Not Match Actual Finished Materials. Refer To Product Samples For Exact Color Match Client Approval/Date: I Landlord Approval/Date: Account ISOMETERIC VIEW (Power Distribution Board)(Generic) NOTE: POWER SUPPLY QUANTITY DEPENDENT ON SIGNAGE REQUIRED. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENT: power distribution board (pdb) to be mounted no more then 12" above ceiling to the bottom of the pdb. refer to design drawings for specific location of pdb. pdb to be mounted so that it is easily accessible from a step ladder. SLOAN POWER SUPPLIES BY FEDERAL HEATH SIGN INSTALLED TO BOARD BY SIGN INSTALLER Project Manager: ELECTRICAL WIREWAY 125 ALUMINUM PAN POWER DISTRIBUTION BOARD BY FEDERAL HEATH SIGN Drawn By: ROBERTO MIJARES 1/2" Project / Location: REZ QTARGET JDR nu. Underwriters rt@C EUECTRiCA TO USEND UALLMEET Store Number: T0852 Laboratories Inc. f ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS 475 ROHNERT PARK EXPY W ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE TO COMPLY WITH U.L. 98 AND ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 ARTICLE 600 OF THE NC, -AN DA R D s. INCLUDING THE PROPER GROUNDI.E.NG AND BONDING OF ALL SIGNS. O° END VIEW scale 1 1/2" = 1'-0" SHIPPING NOTE: PLEASE SHIP ALUMINUM PANELS WITH POWER SUPPLIES IN THE SAME CONTAINER. Job Number: 23-44719-10 Date: OCTOBER 31, 2017 Sheet Number: 10 Of 10 Design Number: 23-44719-10-R1 This original drawing is provided as part of a planned project and is not to be exhibited, copied or reproduced without the written p e r m i s s i o n o f Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC or its authorized agent. ©FHSC City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission Report DATE: February 8, 2018 ITEM NO: 8.2 SUBJECT: File No. PLTU18-0001 —Temporary Conditional Use Permit for Southeast Specific Plan (SESP) Model Home Complexes related to Project Signage LOCATION: Within the Southeast Specific Plan (SEPA) (approximately 80 acres located south of the Canon Manor Specific Plan Area, west of Petaluma Hill Road and undeveloped land, north of Valley House Drive and undeveloped land, and east of Bodway Parkway and undeveloped land.) REQUEST: Approval of the Model Home Temporary Sign Program APPLICANT: Penngrove Mountain LLC SUBJECT Matters relating to the Southeast Specific Plan ("SESP") Project ("the Project"): as proposed the SESP includes approximately 80 acres of lands and allows for a maximum of 475 residential units, 10,000 square feet of commercial uses and a 5 -acre park. 1. Resolution No. 2018-14 approving Temporary Conditional Use Permit for the Southeast Specific Plan Model Home Complexes Related to Project Signage. BACKGROUND The Rohnert Park City Council, at a Special Meeting of Tuesday, December 7, 2010 and a regularly scheduled meeting of December 14, 2010, adopted Resolution(s) No. 2010-134— 2010- 141 and Ordinance Nos. 831 & 832, determining the following action(s) pertaining to the Southeast Specific Plan Project: Resolution No. 2010-134 - Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report Page 1 Resolution No. 2010-135 - Approval of General Plan Amendments and Amended General Plan Land Use Diagram Resolution No. 2010-136 - Approval of Southeast Specific Plan and Design Guidelines Resolution No. 2010-137 - Approval of the Final Development Plan Resolution No. 2010-138 - Approval of the Tentative Map Resolution No. 2010-139 - Approval of the Development Area Plan Resolution No. 2010-140 - Denial of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Adjustment Appeal Resolution No. 2010-141 - Authorization to File Application of Reorganization with LAFCO Ordinance 831 — Prezoning Specific Plan (SP) Ordinance 832 — Development Agreement The SESP is one of five specific plan areas designated in the City's General Plan for future development. The Specific Plan was adopted in 2010 and amended in 2014. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified in conjunction with the 2010 Specific Plan approvals. Revisions in 2014 included adoption of amendments to the Specific Plan, Final Development Plan, Tentative Map, Development Area Plan and Development Agreement. PROPOSED PROJECT Temporary signage will be installed for the purpose of announcing that sales are open to the public. Signs will remain on the property only during the sales phase of the project. Signs will be removed when sales are complete. These signs will be located solely on the Willow Glen property. Signs will consist of four "Main Entry" signs that will be located on the perimeter of the property. The text will contain the project name, "Models Open" and minimal additional text. "Wayfinding" signs will be located on the interior streets and will direct vehicles to the Sales Office and model homes. At the Sales Office site, there will be one "Sales Office" sign, and one "Water Conservation" sign. There will be a "Model" home sign at each model home, for a total of six signs. Signage details are provided as Exhibit 1 to the Resolution and are summarized as follows: The "Main Entry" sign would be a 4 -foot by 14 -foot double faced sign panel mounted on base with landscaping. Total height of the sign would be approximately five (5) feet. There would be a total of five (5) of these signs located on Valley House Drive (2) and Bodway Parkway (3). • The "Wayfinding" signs would be 10 -inches in width by 9 -feet in height double faced sign indicating the direction of the model homes. Of the two (2) "Wayfinding" signs, one would be located at the corner of the public park at the intersection of Wisdom Lane and Watson Drive. The other "Wayfinding" sign would be located adjacent to the model homes at the intersection of Watson Drive and Waterside Lane. • The one (1) "Sales Center" sign would be 3 -feet by 5.5 -feet and located in front of one of the model homes across the street from the public park along Watson Drive. Page 2 The "Model" signs would be 2.5 feet in width by 4.5 feet in height. There would be a total of six (6) "Model" signs, each placed in front of the respective model home along Waterside Lane and Watson Drive. The one (1) "Water Conservation" sign would be approximately 2 feet in width and 3 feet in height. The sign would be placed adjacent to the drought tolerant landscaping in front of one of the model homes. Signs will be constructed with overlayed ply, wrapped with a four-color process matte print. The panels will have substantial thickness, ranging from 6" to 10". The "WG" sign would be cut from metal and will be mounted flush to the sign panels, ranging in depth from 4" to I", depending on the size of the panel. The overall intention is to give a look of premium quality. Staff Analysis The Southeast Specific Plan temporary sign proposal consists of a moderate number of signs to direct customers to and from the model homes and overall Willow Glen development. For the most part, the signs are located along the main entry roads to the development, and on the main model home access roads in the development. Environmental Determination The proposed Sign program is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article 19 Categorically Exemptions Section 15311 Accessory Structures Class Il (a) On -Premises signs. No further action is required pertaining to environmental review. Findings Findings for the Temporary Sign Program are included in the attached resolution. Public Notification This item has been duly noticed by publication in the Community Voice for the Temporary Conditional Use Permit and posted at the prescribed locations in Rohnert Park. Property owners within 300 feet of the project were mailed notices of the proposed application. Staff Recommendation Based on the analysis of this report and the attached resolution, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by motion, adopt Resolution No. 2018-14 approving a Temporary Conditional Use Permit for a Temporary Sign Program for the Willow Glen model homes, subject to the Conditions of Approval. Page 3 Attachments: A. Resolution No. 2018-14 EXHIBITS: 1. Willow Glen Temporary Sign Program APPROVALS: ot_n 41/v LI& Brett Bollinger, PlanniA Consu ant Y� v_" 5 JL eiswenger, Planning Mdhager Page 4 ,-z - 4 - / s Date ;•"/,-IV Date PLANNING COMMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2018-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SOUTHEAST SPECIFIC PLAN MODEL HOME COMPLEX RELATED TO PROJECT SIGNAGE WHEREAS, the applicant, Penngrove Mountain LLC, filed Planning Application No. PLTU18-0001 a Temporary Conditional Use Permit for the Willow Glen model homes temporary sign program in the Southeast Specific Plan in accordance with the City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PLTU18-0001 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, pursuant to California State Law and the RPMC, public hearing notices were mailed to all property owners within an area exceeding a three hundred foot radius of the subject property and a public hearing was published for a minimum of 10 days prior to the first public hearing in the Community Voice; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 2018, the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Application No. PLTU18-0001 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support of or opposition to the project; and, WHEREAS, at the February 8, 2018 Planning Commission meeting, upon considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Planning Commission considered all the facts relating to Planning Application No. PLTU18-0001; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Factors considered. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PLTU18-0001, makes the following factors, to wit: A. That the proposed location of the temporary use is consistent with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; The proposed signs will direct the public to the model home complexes in Southeast Specific Plan area. They will also inform potential home purchasers to the location of the model homes development within Southeast Specific Plan. The signs are located on the major surrounding streets bordering the development for the convenience of potential home buyers. B. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and that the operation and maintenance of the Conditional Use will be compatible with the surrounding uses. The signs are located to safely direct potential home buyers to the model home complexes within the development. They are in locations that will not obstruct construction activities in the development. C. The proposed temporary use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title. The proposed signs are consistent with the Southeast Specific Plan Development Area Plan as approved by the City Council. Section 3. Environmental Clearance. The proposed Sign program is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article 19 Categorically Exemptions Section 15311 Accessory Structures Class II (a) On -Premises signs. No further action is required pertaining to environmental review. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Planning Application No. PLTU18-0001 subject to the following conditions: 1) The Temporary Conditional Use Permit is approved for up to 48 months from the Planning Commission approval date of February 8, 2018, subject to an annual review by Development Services staff for compliance with application provisions and conditions of approval. A report on the status and compliance with conditions shall be submitted to the Planning Commission. After reviewing the report the Planning Commission may determine if further review of the permit is necessary. 2) Temporary signage shall be installed as shown on the Willow Glen Temporary Sign Program Exhibits except as hereinafter modified. 3) Any graffiti or damage to signs shall be promptly repaired. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said action shall not be deemed final until the appeal period has expired and that the appeal period shall be ten (10) working days from the date of said action. No building permits shall be issued until the appeal period has expired, providing there are no appeals. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 8th day of February, 2018 by the City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ADAMS BLANQUIE BORBA GIUDICE HAYDON Susan Adams, Chairperson, Rohnert Park Planning Commission Attest: Susan Azevedo, Recording Secretary WILLOWGLEN HOMES PETALUMA HILL ROAD ROHN ERT PARK TEMPORARY SIGN PROGRAM J RECEIVED JAN 0 2 2018 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK MT =WTI MT= ST R�e!,■� No. r"'Jlew-i IF -pow Io`Isoioj�R` �! �� "i1 �Resupon � =*� ■~ 11-1Iso-FRol11�Edo�;' 11, ■■!1 OR I9 1 MEN:�.�■'�N�11■il.�.■.lr.�ll■ZVr;.ri,�a ►Y+rr,V..-�,rr��r r—L�.-,tr. la��,�r.rr`�/� .�fwMr 1{1�1t:,1►>, .� r+ 11H, MI 0I�l S�■a7+�irrlr1 —J�k�II .1 r *■.1,-_■ ■fiirDo . r r:~ 1f■ .1.d""r r•rI1r}wrI, I Eal. 1.r3■ r■�.� raA M!I.L frw: f:I ,w' ■7 rwI{7w.� roll.. a r ■� � r rILL,��IN rr1' �1 4' T rra �t ■Ir ■"11 ■ �■A �■1 ■��f �r.l■1 f■af< , 1'l,,�+� �i�f7 • L: �7�rrl�.l�i �� �r I Bi I ao rs..Ji i+ ■w ^� .�.�r a�Iy 1L I JIL 11-��:Ll1� ��:.r��+ :r 1� r:w,l r�r T r ` __ ■. •� rLal�Z� MQ rlN l M I 11 Y fAAIr� 11� r ■7 �� rz, •_� �'' 1 ?int ll ■■ ■■ rr�t I■ ■ ■ >II ■ s r7li w r..re+a..r ■ �� Fl.-liffli, WO",1 110310.1i� �= ■fl I 1RJI>MA s . 11 s par R 1 *i=w &.01190all, Y ROPE G�1llf ir r r Jw r r iI Jspt —� I 1■a tali # 'Ai ram � 1 �l �■■ r" {f■�'`:■ ■ f�1■i'' o f��L�i! �ls.�.s;�l LVI rc L INW r>< - a� ■■. �w !1^'M 1K il ■I^r alar■ w■ r 1rEi 1, i� ■� j w jai t d1 LURE`y11 Rol L,■ .■r� N �F ►� �l w1 �ra�+ rµ �4 lINS, VOKNIN NN a�.1 �..a r11ir r■ ■r�-r ■■+ra L�'tii'�� �R-1 1■R �9 a■■ ,����� 1F� �� lint p�' ■�1 ����� �i °'ilrf w i= � ■'ate'; ..� Ll � SO .�� MT Double Sided SignI P1, _ I 11.._..1 ._r nL. Black Metal Letters TOP VIEW 36 min" FRONT VIEW Main Entries - Temporary SIDE VIEW W `� �� P�{{' `� �'T{ �}.' 1 '.i TO" d r �•i� 1f,F�� 1`.l�r�' ' fSA .. �.' 'a,•xi .. 4 �. �� _ - 4�, S•�►,t "'yr�r#' r d. , �5 i�'f iij �1 py,� �'` ,..tat xi 1+ .#, i r fO� !:�i'4 vy r 4"`y� 1 • # - � y'} �'� - _ - Jas ���.�+R� ��'r �' � r�S• � 1 :�� .�+AW _ �{ 11+i .,n ;..._ ..�� ���, dam'' ' �! .. �'-' �. �.`.°\-'. e:'-str!.. err , •}�` <, ' �� . F �� �! S'-�r.� c. ���� •�� TEMPORARY SIGH{ PROGRAM 3 ©, 6.. TOP VIEW Overlayed Ply with Matte Vinyl Surface`" IA/1I I C til 1 Sales Center - Temporary 7' 11; Double Sided Sign Black Metal Letters SIDE VIEW 2'-6" 6" Black Metal Letters 'lot— TOP VIEW 0 Models - Temporary /— Double Sided Sign SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW Water Conservation Temporary City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission Report DATE: - February 8, 2018 ITEM NO: 8.3 AGENDA TITLE: PLDP117-0003 UDSP Affordable Housing Site DAP REQUEST: Consideration of a Development Area Plan for a 218 -unit Affordable Rental Housing Project and proposed Amenities for Griffin's Grove Park LOCATION: UDSP Affordable Housing Project: Approximately 8.24 Acres located on the corner of Keiser Avenue and Kerry Road, APN 159-550-007. Griffin's Grove Park: 6.83 -acre park located immediately east of the UDSP Affordable Housing Project, south of Keiser Road, portion of APN 159-550-008. GP / ZONING: University District Specific Plan -High Density Residential APPLICANT: Pacific West Communities SUBJECT Resolution No. 2018-15 recommending City Council approval of a Development Area Plan for a 218 -unit affordable housing project located on southwest corner of Keiser Avenue and Kerry Road within the University Specific Plan Area (APN 159-550-007) and Resolution No. 2018-16 recommending City Council approval of a Development Area Plan for Griffin's Grove Park (portion of APN 159-550-008). BACKGROUND In 2006, the University District Specific Plan (UDSP) was approved and associated General Plan amendments were adopted and implemented to allow development of 1,610 residential units. The UDSP included approximately 300 acres of lands owned by five property owners (University District LLC, Vast Oak Properties, Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District, Gee, and Linden) in the City of Rohnert Park. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was Page 1 prepared and adopted by the City in conjunction with this 2006 approval of the Specific Plan and parties entered into a development agreement.. In April 2014, the City Council approved revisions to the adopted Specific Plan, which included changes to the Development Standards and Design Guidelines and allowed an increase in the number of residential units and reduction in the amount of commercial area. This amendment identified 218 affordable housing units to be located within a high-density residential lot which is the subject of this proposed project. The City, University District and Vast Oak Properties also entered into an Amended and Restated Development Agreement governing the terms of development (the "Development Agreement"). The Development Agreement sets forth certain requirements regarding the construction, operation and long-term affordability of the affordable housing project. As part of the 2014 City Council approval, park plans that included a 6.83 -acre park within Vast Oaks West (Twin Creeks Park) and a 6.83 -acre park within Vast Oak North (Griffin's Grove Park) were also revised. The Development Agreement sets forth a requirement for an approximately six -acre park within Vast Oak North. The proposed project would modify the size of Griffin's Grove Park by approximately 4,850 square feet to accommodate parking for the affordable housing project. Parks and Recreation Commission On January 18, 2018, the Parks and Recreation Commission considered a proposal by the applicant to include a 10 -foot wide portion of the neighboring Griffin's Grove Park to accommodate some of the parking required for the affordable housing project. The PRC recommended approval of the project with the proposed park changes. The PRC staff report is included as Attachment B PROPOSED PROJECT AND ENTITLEMENTS Location and Access The project is bound by Keiser Avenue to the north, Kerry Road to the west, O'Ryan Road to the south and a future park site to the east. Access to the site is proposed with one access driveway at Kerry Road and one access driveway at O'Ryan Road. In addition, a fire safety access driveway is proposed at Keiser Avenue, as required by the fire department to insure that emergency vehicles can access the property from the north to provide emergency response to buildings located on along Keiser Avenue. Project Details The applicant is seeking approval for a Development Area Plan (DAP) for the University District Specific Plan (UDSP), Affordable Housing Project and the adjacent Griffin's Grove Park. The two components of the DAP are further described as follows: UDSP Affordable Housing Project (Pacific West Communities). Pacific West is proposing to develop the 9.13 -acre University District Affordable Housing property into a 218 -unit affordable rental housing development in accordance with the Development Agreement. The project proposes a total of 116,146 square feet of open space area, which includes a total of 97,953 square feet of public outdoor open space, a 1,538 square foot community building, and a total 16,655 square feet of private open space area (within enclosed patios for each unit). The public open space is provided in a linear park Page 2 configuration with the community building located at the west end of the linear park and two play areas on each end of the park. The park component of the development also includes two barbeque areas, a dog park area and a large open lawn area within the center of the linear park. Pedestrian paths provide interconnectedness between the two play areas and the community building and the other park amenities. In addition, the pedestrian paths direct tenants to crosswalks that lead to the nearby Griffin's Grove Park located just west of the project site. The project proposes a total of 443 parking spaces, 40 of which will be located along the east property boundary with a portion of these spaces encroaching onto the adjacent Griffin's Grove Park. This will require a 10 -foot lot line adjustment to allow for the placement of the parking spaces. 2. Griffin's Grove Park. The design for this park (formerly known as Oak Grove Park) was approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission back in 2014 along with approval of the UDSP Specific Plan. This park is intended to be "passive" in character. The focus of park improvements is to protect Oak trees on the site and protect the natural features as much as possible. Walking paths were included with the original design. The new design for Griffin's Grove Park will continue to protect the Oak trees and keep the park "passive" in character but add a few amenities in the southeast corner of the park (Bocce Ball courts, picnic tables and a shade structure). Parking for Affordable Housing Project The applicant proposes a total of 443 parking spaces, which includes 63 tandem spaces, 93 compact spaces and 326 standard spaces. The parking obligation for the proposed project is 489 spaces as shown in the Table 2 below, prior to the application of any eligible exemptions and reductions. Table 2 — Parkitx x Requirement Unit Type Number of Units Parking required per Unit Total Required (before 10% reduction) Total Proposed 1 Bedroom 27 1 27 2 Bedroom 141 2 282 - 3 Bedroom 50 2.5 125 Guest Spaces 218 1 per 4 55 489 443 In addition to the above parking requirement, the project will require the following as part of the mix of parking spaces: • 24 ADA spaces are proposed - 20 ADA spaces are required • 22 electric vehicle spaces are proposed • 72 bicycle parking spaces are proposed - 55 spaces are required Parking Exemption • According to the number of residential units, 489 parking spaces would be typically be required for a project of this size. However, the Municipal Code (Section 17.16.040) provides a parking exemption that allow for the required parking to be reduced by 10% provided that the project includes the following: Rideshare, Page 3 Transit incentive program, or Other transportation system management program A condition of approval will be adopted along with the project approval to require that a transportation system management program is provided prior to occupancy to allow the project to qualify for this parking reduction. With the reduction, the required parking is 440 spaces and the project is providing 443 — compliant with the Municipal Code. Property Boundary Adjustments needed. The parking configuration proposed above will require a lot line adjustment along the easterly property boundary to accommodate 40 parking spaces. Without these parking space, the project will fall well short of the required parking number, since only 403 spaces are located on the current parcel. Since the necessary lot line adjustment would reduce the size of the park, this proposal was considered by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended approval of the proposed project on January 18, 2018. Parking Lot Landscaping Pursuant to section 17.16. 100 of the Zoning Ordinance, the project is required to include parking lot landscaping, as follows: ■ Perimeter planting areas with a minimum ten (10) feet width adjacent to a residential district and five (5) feet adjacent to other districts. • A parking lot adjoining a street shall have a frontage planting area reflecting the required yard setbacks from the street. Parking areas shall be screened from adjacent streets with berming and/or landscaping to achieve an average height of three feet above the adjacent grade of the parking area. ■ The end of each row of parking stalls shall be separated from driveways by a landscaped planter with a preferred width of five feet. • Parking lot trees at a minimum ratio of one tree for every four parking spaces. • No more than six consecutive parking spaces should be allowed in any row of parking without a tree well or tree well finger from a landscape strip. The applicant has provided a landscape plan that complies with the above list of requirements. Open Space The project is required to provide a total of 400 square feet of open space per unit for a total of 87,200 square feet of open space required. Open space can be provided as private and public open space, with a total of at least 100 square feet of private open space required for ground level units and a total of at least 60 square feet of private open space required for the upper level units. The proposed site plans demonstrates that the project will provide approximately 114,608 square feet of open space therefore exceeding the minimum required. In addition, the project includes a recreational building that will serve the linear park. The overall breakdown of open space and the recreation building is as follows: • Private open space: 16,655 square feet o Each ground level unit will have at least 100 square feet of private outdoor space o Each upper level unit will have at least 60 square feet of private outdoor space ■ Public outdoor open space: 97,953 square feet Page 4 Park Amenities -Affordable Housing Site The applicant proposes a linear park with a 1,538 square foot community building located at the westerly end of the park. There are two play areas with play structures located at each end of the park. Picnic tables and barbeque areas are located near each of the play areas. A designated dog park with tubular steel fencing is located on the east side of the linear park Park Amen ities- Griffin's Grove Park The proponent for the University District Specific Plan Area has provided a site plan demonstrating how Griffin's Grove Park would be developed with amenities that include trails, a park plaza, shade structures and benches and a bocce ball court. Griffin's Grove Park was envisioned as a "passive" park. The proposed added amenities would be consistent with the passive park concept. Architecture Residential buildings The applicant proposed to construct nine (9) multi -family residential building placed in rows of three in an east west linear configuration. The Architectural style of the buildings uses traditional lines with a combination of siding including horizontal lap, board and batten, and shingle. Entry ways are outlined with a single -story porch -like roof element that incorporates the use of a limestone column base. Mailboxes The applicant proposes a mailbox kiosk to be located near the community building. The kiosk will include the required mailboxes, an enclosure structure with horizontal lap siding and a roof cover. Trash enclosures There are four trash enclosure areas dispersed throughout the site to provide ease of access to each of the buildings. The materials used for the enclosure consist of split face concrete masonry units for three sides of the structure. A decorative metal screen with planted vines will be placed on all three sides to provide screening of the wall. Corrugated steel metal gates will provide access to the interior of each of the trash enclosure units. Monument Signs Two approximately 6.5 foot high monument signs will be placed at each of the site access points located on O'Ryan Road and Kerry Road. The signs include a 2.6 -foot high natural stone base with a 3.9 -foot high project sign. NOTIFICATION A public hearing notice denoting the time, date, and location of this hearing was published in the Community Voice on January 26, 2018. Property owners within 300 feet of the Project site and interested parties requesting notification were also mailed notices, and the notice was posted pursuant to State law. Page 5 ANALYSTS The University District Specific Plan identifies this site as the affordable housing component of the University District Specific Plan area, to be developed with 218 affordable rental housing units. In addition, the proposed project meets the requirements of Exhibit D, Section Il, Affordable Housing Complex, of the Development Agreement (DA). Exhibit D, Section 11 (D) of the DA applies minimum quality standards to the apartments as follows: "The Affordable Apartments shall be of high architectural quality, effectively and aesthetically designed and constructed in a workmanlike manner with professionally rendered finishes. The Affordable Apartments shall be indistinguishable from the comparable market rate condominiums in exterior and interior design, quality, materials, fixtures and architectural elements (other than interior flooring materials, countertops, cabinetry and appliances which shall be high quality, but need not be identical to the market rate condominiums). At least eighty percent (80%) of the Affordable Apartments shall be 2- bedroom/2-bath units or larger, and at least ten percent ( 10%) shall be 3- bedroom/2-bath units. Developer shall use best efforts to increase number of 3- bedroom/2-bath units by converting 2- bedroom/ 2- bath units where feasible to do so within the design/ footprint." As proposed, the apartments will comply with the above provisions of the DA. The design and materials proposed will result in apartment buildings that will be of similar or higher quality than market rate apartment buildings in town. The open space provided far exceeds that required in the zoning ordinance both in terms of quantity of land area and quality of amenities provided. The complex will exceed the minimum number of units that are required by the DA to be two- bedroom or larger. The project provides 191 (88 percent) two-bedroom or larger units, which exceeds the minimum of 80 percent. The number of three-bedroom units also exceeds the required minimum, providing 50 (23 percent), which exceeds the minimum of 10 percent. The project provides the additional details required of a Development Area Plan including site plan, landscape plan, open space areas, parking lot configuration, pedestrian access points, and vehicular access all of which are consistent with University District Specific Plan. In addition, the project includes detailed amenities that would be part of the Griffin's Grove Park development. The proposed project, inclusive of the proposed lot line adjustment with Griffin's Grove Park, received preliminary vetting by the Planning Commission on November 1, 2017. At that meeting the Planning Commission expressed support of the proposed project including the concept of modifying the easterly property boundary to accommodate the required parking so long the project included a concurrent DAP for site amenities for the park. The applicant is now requesting that the Planning Commission consider the formal application for the University District Affordable Housing DAP and find the DAP consistent with the University District Specific Plan and recommend City Council approval. In addition, a DAP for Griffin's Grove Park is also presented for concurrent consideration by the Planning Commission. In order to approve a development area plan application, pursuant to Rohnert Park Municipal Code section 17.06.400(E), the City Council must find the proposed development conforms to the specific plan; and either: (a) Public infrastructure and services can be provided concurrently with the Page 6 development; or (b) a statement of public policy consideration and/or an exception can be granted. As noted in the attached Resolutions for adoption by the Planning Commission, the findings for approval can be made. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Rohnert Park, as the lead agency, has conducted an environmental review of the University District Specific Plan Area, which includes the project site. The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to address the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may be associated with the planning, construction, and operation of the Project and to identify appropriate and feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to significantly reduce or avoid the impacts identified in the EIR. The City certified the Final EIR on May 23, 2006 and approved an Addendum to the Final EIR on April 8, 2014. A consistency analysis has been prepared as part of the environmental review of the proposed project. The consistency analysis concludes that the proposed Affordable Housing project is consistent with the 2006 UDSP EIR. Impacts associated with the project are consistent with those previously identified and analyzed in the 2006 EIR and implementation of applicable mitigation measures, as identified throughout this consistency analysis, would ensure that all project -related impacts remain less than significant, consistent with the 2006 EIR. Impacts that were significant and unavoidable in the 2006 EIR remain significant and unavoidable and were considered prior to adoption of the UDSP. To ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of applicable EIR mitigation measures, the project would be required to adhere to the MMRP for the 2006 EIR. In addition, the development of Griffin's Grove Park is consistent with the UDSP EIR. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS No public comments have been received on this item. Attachments 1. Resolution No. 2018-15 Exhibit A - Project Plans, UDSP Affordable Housing Project Exhibit B — Conditions of Approval 2. Resolution No. 2018-16 Exhibit A - Project Plans, Griffin's Grove Park Exhibit B — Conditions of Approval 3. Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report 4. Environmental Consistency Analysis Planning Manager Date Page 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2018-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN TO ALLOW A 218 - UNIT AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF KEISER AVENUE AND WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (APN 159-550-007) WHEREAS, the applicant, Chris Grant, on behalf of Pacific West Communities, filed Planning Applications proposing a Development Area Plan for development of a 218 -unit affordable rental housing project on the property located south of Keiser Avenue and west of the future Griffin's Grove Park and within the University District Specific Plan Area —APN 159-550- 007 (the "Project"), in accordance with the City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code ("RPMC"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Consistency Analysis prepared for the Project; recommended approval by the City Council and has otherwise carried out all requirements for the Project pursuant to CEQA; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California State Law and the RPMC, public hearing notices were mailed to all property owners within an area exceeding a three hundred foot radius of the subject property and a public hearing was published for a minimum of 10 days prior to the first public hearing in the Community Voice; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in Planning Application No. PLDP17-0003 for the proposed Development Area Plan for the property; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Rohnert Park makes the following findings, determinations and recommendations with respect to the proposed Development Area Plan for the property: Section 1. The above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. CEQA Finding. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Rohnert Park, as the lead agency, conducted an environmental review of the University District Specific Plan Area, which includes the project site. The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to address the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may be associated with the planning, construction, and operation of the Project and to identify appropriate and feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to significantly reduce or avoid the impacts identified in the EIR. The City certified the Final EIR on May 23, 2006 and approved an Addendum to the Final EIR on April 8, 2014. A consistency analysis, incorporated herein by this reference, has been prepared as part of the environmental review of the proposed project. The consistency analysis concludes that the proposed Affordable Housing project is consistent with the 2006 UDSP EIR. Impacts associated with the project are consistent with those previously identified and analyzed in the 2006 EIR and implementation of applicable mitigation measures, as identified throughout this consistency analysis, would ensure that all project -related impacts remain less than significant, consistent with the 2006 EIR. Impacts that were significant and unavoidable in the 2006 EIR remain significant and unavoidable and were considered prior to adoption of the UDSP. To ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of applicable EIR mitigation measures, the project is being required to adhere to the MMRP for the 2006 EIR. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. Section 3. Fitidin rs for Approval of Development Area Plan. The Planning Commission, in recommending to the City Council approval of Planning Application No. PLDP 117-0003 hereby makes the following findings concerning the Development Area Plan findings in accordance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 17.06.400: 1. The proposed development conforms to the applicable specific plan Criteria Satisfied. The University District Specific Plan identifies this site as the affordable housing component of the University District Specific Plan area, to be development with 218 affordable rental housing units. The project provides the additional details required of a Development Area Plan including site plan, landscape plan, open space areas, parking lot configuration, pedestrian access points, and vehicular access all of which are consistent with University District Specific Plan. In addition, the project includes detailed amenities that would be part of the Griffin's Grove Park development to compensate for the 10 -foot wide lot line adjustment between the two properties. With the implementation of Exhibit B (Conditions of Approval), this project qualifies for a parking exemption of 10% which is necessary for the development of the project consistent with the zoning ordinance parking requirements. 2. Public infrastructure and services can be provided concurrently with the development Criteria Satisfied. The developer will be required to participate in the Public Facilities Financing Plan, which will provide for necessary off-site public facilities, and shall be responsible for on-site facilities to meet the project's needs. The Development Agreement for the project sets forth the timing of the necessary facilities as they relate to the physical development of the site. Section 4. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of Application No. PLDP 17-0003 for a Development Area Plan (Exhibit A) to a 218 - unit affordable rental housing development of property located south of Keiser Avenue and west of the future Griffin's Grove Park and within the University District Specific Plan Area (APN 159- 550-007), subject to the recommended conditions of approval in Exhibit B. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 8th day of February, 2018 by the City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission by the following vote: Attest: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ADAMS BLANQUIE BORBA —__ GIUDICE HAYDON Susan Adams, Chairperson, City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission Susan Azevedo, Recording Secretary Exhibit B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Resolution No. 2018-15 UNIVERSITY DISTRICT AFFORDABLE HOUSING — AT UNIVERSITY DISTRICT ON-GOING CONDITIONS The conditions below shall apply to the University District Affordable Housing Project (PLDP17-0003) at University District. The University District Development Area Plan shall be developed in accordance with the General Plan (GP), University District Specific Plan (UDSP) including Design Guidelines, Mitigation Measures (MMs) identified in the UDSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Development Agreement (DA) between the City and University District LLC and Vast Oak Properties L.P., the Rohnert Park Municipal Code (RPMC), and the Design and Construction Standards. General Reguirements 1) The applicant shall comply with all documents approved by the City Council and adhere to all verbal representations and exhibits presented by the applicant at the Planning Commission and\or City Council meeting for approval of the University District Specific Plan project unless subsequently revised by the City. 2) The applicant shall comply with the FEIR and Consistency Analysis. In addition the applicant shall pay the cost to monitor the mitigation measures identified in the FEIR for the UDSP Project (SCH # 2003122014) kept on file in the Development Services Department. The requirements contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) shall be incorporated into these conditions and constructed in accordance with the MMP. 3) The applicant shall comply with all terms of the DA, including without limitation, the requirements set forth in Exhibit D (II)(C) and (E) to record an Affordable Housing Agreement and to prepare a marketing and implementation plan. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded against the property no later than prior to the issuance of a building permit for the project. 4) The applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, elected and appointed officials, and employees, from any and all liability or claims that may be brought against the City arising out of its approval of the University District Affordable Housing DAP save and except that caused by the City's active negligence. 5) By accepting the benefits conferred under the University District Affordable Housing DAP, the applicant acknowledges all the conditions imposed and accepts the DAP subject to those conditions with full awareness of the provisions, as may be amended from time to time, and the RPMC, as applicable. 6) The use of the property by the applicant/grantee for any activity authorized by University District Affordable Housing DAP shall constitute acceptance of all of the conditions and obligations imposed by the City. The applicant/grantee by said acceptance waives any challenge as to the validity of these conditions. 7) All improvements shall comply with all applicable sections of the City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code and any other applicable relevant plans of affected agencies, unless superseded by the Specific Plan for this property. 8) The development of this project shall be consistent with all other approvals associated with this project (e.g. UDSP/Design Guidelines). 9) The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and clearances from the Rohnert Park Building and Public Safety Departments prior to occupancy of the project. Site Plan, Landscaping and Signs 10) All improvements shall be in conformance with the submitted Site Plans, Exterior Elevations, and Landscape Plans, except as modified herein. 11) The applicant shall complete a Lot Line Adjustment between the project site and the adjoining property to the east (Griffin's Grove Park). 12) Prior to any grading on this property the applicant shall file for, receive approvals for and cause recordation of a Lot Line Adjustment required by condition of approval 11. 13) All plant materials proposed for use within the project shall be in conformance with the University District Plant Material Matrix contained in Appendix B of the Specific Plan. 14) The design of all entrances to the site shall be subject to Department of Public Safety approval. 15) The designs and locations of decorative paving treatments shall be subject to staff review and approval. 16) The Planning Manager shall have the authority to administratively approve minor variations to the exterior residential color schemes, materials, and finishes that may be subsequently proposed following DAP approval. 17) Air conditioning or mechanical ventilation shall be provided to allow occupants to close windows and doors for adequate noise isolation. Any ground -mounted air conditioning units proposed shall be screened from public view by fencing or landscaping with the final design subject to Staff approval. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment shall be concealed so as not to be visible from public view. This condition shall not apply to roof - mounted photo -voltaic panels, with approval of the building and planning divisions. 18) Design and placement of walls and fences, and gates shall be in accordance with the standards included in University District Affordable Housing DAP and shall be approved by planning staff. 19) All residential buildings and dwelling units shall display illuminated street numbers in a prominent location in such a position that the numbers are easily visible to approaching emergency vehicles. The numbers shall be of a contrasting color to the background to which they are attached and four (4) inches minimum in height. 20) The project applicant shall design and construct all project facilities in accordance with the most recent seismic standards of the California Building Standards Code. 21) The applicant shall design and construct the foundations and/or building pads for all project structures using standard engineering practices that account for, and minimize damage resulting from, expansive soil conditions. Specific design and constructed methods shall be as directed by Mitigation Measure GEO-8a of the FEIR for this project. 22) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, front yard landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by Planning Staff and the City Engineer. Such plans shall be in substantial conformance with the plan submitted as a part of this application. 23) All trees within five feet of the public right-of-way shall have root barriers that are approved by the Engineering Division. 24) A permanent automatic sprinkler shall be installed to maintain all landscape materials and areas. 25) The applicant's engineer shall coordinate with the City Engineer to ensure that recycled water is used for irrigation of the project's landscaping, if available. 26) All exterior lighting shall be designed so as to prevent any spillover lighting onto adjacent properties and rights-of-way. New lighting levels provided shall be compatible with general illumination levels in existing areas to avoid a noticeable contrast in light emissions, consistent with the need to provide for safety and security. 27) Roof -mounted lights are prohibited on buildings without prior approval of Development Services Department. 28) The final location for mailbox enclosures, enclosure sizes, and total number of mailboxes and parcel boxes per enclosure shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division and United States Post Office. Site Improvements 29) All double-check valves provided for domestic water and fire sprinkler systems shall be concealed from any public streets and parking lots with decorative walls and landscaping. Plans shall be submitted to the Development Services Department and City Engineer for review and approval. 30) Any existing overhead and proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Construction Mitigation 31) For any project requiring an on-site inspector to monitor grading, housing construction and/or development, the applicant shall deposit funds with the City to cover the full cost of an inspector prior to any land disturbance. The City Engineer, as appropriate, shall approve the amount and hire the inspector. 32) The developer shall comply with construction hours pursuant to Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 9.44.120. 33) All construction material waste and other debris shall be recycled to the extent feasible. The applicant shall present a "clean site everyday" program to City building staff for approval. The program shall include on-site signage in English and Spanish to be posted at construction entrances. No animals shall be brought on site by construction personnel during work hours. 34) All material storage areas shall be fenced with at least a 6 -foot high chain link fence with at least two separate points of access with sufficient width for emergency vehicles. The access points shall be shown on the construction fire and security protection site plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2018-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN FOR GRIFFIN'S GROVE PARK LOCATED SOUTH OF KEISER AVENUE AND WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, (Portion of APN 159-550-008) WHEREAS, the applicant, Kevin Poulson, on behalf of Brookfield homes, filed Planning Applications proposing a Development Area Plan for a 6.83 -acre park located south of Keiser Avenue and east of the University District Affordable housing site and within the University District Specific Plan Area —APN 159-550-008 (the "Project"), in accordance with the City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code ("RPMC"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Consistency Analysis prepared for the Project; recommended approval by the City Council and has otherwise carried out all requirements for the Project pursuant to CEQA; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California State Law and the RPMC, public hearing notices were mailed to all property owners within an area exceeding a three hundred foot radius of the subject property and a public hearing was published for a minimum of 10 days prior to the first public hearing in the Community Voice; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in Planning Application No. PLDP 17-0003 for the proposed Development Area Plan for the property; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Rohnert Park makes the following findings, determinations and recommendations with respect to the proposed Development Area Plan for the property: Section 1. The above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. CSA Finding. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Rohnert Park, as the lead agency, conducted an environmental review of the University District Specific Plan Area, which includes the project site. The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to address the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may be associated with the planning, construction, and operation of the Project and to identify appropriate and feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to significantly reduce or avoid the impacts identified in the EIR. The City certified the Final EIR on May 23, 2006 and approved an Addendum to the Final EIR on April 8, 2014. Impacts associated with the park project are consistent with those previously identified and analyzed in the 2006 EIR and implementation of applicable mitigation measures would ensure that all project -related impacts remain less than significant, consistent with the 2006 EIR. Impacts that were significant and unavoidable in the 2006 EIR remain significant and unavoidable and were considered prior to adoption of the UDSP. To ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of applicable EIR mitigation measures, the project is being required to adhere to the MMRP for the 2006 EIR. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. Section 3. Findings for Approval of Development Area Plan. The Planning Commission, in recommending to the City Council approval of Planning Application No. PLDP17-0003 hereby makes the following findings concerning the Development Area Plan findings in accordance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 17.06.400: 1. The proposed development conforms to the applicable specific plan Criteria Satisfied. The University District Specific Plan identifies this site as 6.83 -acre park. The park has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission as appropriate for a passive park site. The project includes a future 10 -foot wide lot line adjustment between the project site and the neighboring University District Affordable Housing project to the west. The project provides the additional details required of a Development Area Plan including site plan, landscape plan, pedestrian trails, bocce courts, and other pedestrian amenities, all of which are consistent with University District Specific Plan. These additional amenities would compensate for the 10 -foot wide lot line adjustment between the two properties. 2. Public infrastructure and services can be provided concurrently with the development Criteria Satisfied. The developer will be required to participate in the Public Facilities Financing Plan, which will provide for necessary off-site public facilities, and shall be responsible for on-site facilities to meet the project's needs. The Development Agreement for the project sets forth the timing of the necessary facilities as they relate to the physical development of the site. Section 4. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of Application No. PLDP 17-0003 for a Development Area Plan (Exhibit A) for the Griffin's Grove Park property located south of Keiser Avenue and east of the University District Affordable Housing site and within the University District Specific Plan Area (APN 159-550-008), subject to the recommended conditions of approval in Exhibit B. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 8th day of February, 2018 by the City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ADAMS BLANQUIE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BORBA GIUDICE HAYDON Susan Adams, Chairperson, City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission Attest: Susan Azevedo, Recording Secretary LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR: VAST OAK NORTH PUBLIC PARK* 1st LAND DEVELOPMENT PHASE - VAST OAK NORTH AT UNIVERSITY DISTRICT ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 10, 2018 *PUBLIC PARK NAME TO BE DETERMINED BY CITY VICINITY MAP SITE MAP - PROJECTS — — SITE I j_ -- VAST OAK NORTH PUBUC PARK TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER SHEET L-1.0 PRELIMINARY OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1.1 CONSTRUCTION & LANDSCAPE DETAILS L-1.2 SITE FURNISHINGS IMAGES L-1.3 Brookfield Vast Oak North at University District ,rana.rroo+en-Au«"- I_ Residential Development VAST OAK NORTH PUBLIC PARK Cover Sheet ::rM ^`.`e= L-1 .0 600 LA GONDA WAY r ' •,•1 DANVILLE, CALIFORNIA RA670 Area Plan IRsspa»oo6 Rohnert Park, California CMWWAREAWNffKU Scale: Not Applicable 7 JANUARY 10, 2016 Project No D4416 CeVV62M 20$a raMerFoat"n AiGOPOl0! ThadlawNlpW w WRMMI rnataftih COmTRIR0 Ih0 pdp6Nd WW .MWA Wl WdWWX 61 ft br4k any fail ft WF EPA' p Obftd vMhk%R 1h0 wfpNn a0nlnnl 01vW dOrTvakn AT. x%ulvs 6 �� rfFlEP ar Y ' CRY "a is VAST OAKS 1", (ElA Eft lh1f 4R �, SONOW STATE TANK SREO UNIVERSITY L COIATi X4CHESTER DR CWTIS OR 101 ', 1D4NOIU KAY —am RD AM P, r "f E�CAT71V$_AYE NTS -- VAST OAK NORTH PUBUC PARK TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER SHEET L-1.0 PRELIMINARY OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1.1 CONSTRUCTION & LANDSCAPE DETAILS L-1.2 SITE FURNISHINGS IMAGES L-1.3 Brookfield Vast Oak North at University District ,rana.rroo+en-Au«"- I_ Residential Development VAST OAK NORTH PUBLIC PARK Cover Sheet ::rM ^`.`e= L-1 .0 600 LA GONDA WAY r ' •,•1 DANVILLE, CALIFORNIA RA670 Area Plan IRsspa»oo6 Rohnert Park, California CMWWAREAWNffKU Scale: Not Applicable 7 JANUARY 10, 2016 Project No D4416 CeVV62M 20$a raMerFoat"n AiGOPOl0! ThadlawNlpW w WRMMI rnataftih COmTRIR0 Ih0 pdp6Nd WW .MWA Wl WdWWX 61 ft br4k any fail ft WF EPA' p Obftd vMhk%R 1h0 wfpNn a0nlnnl 01vW dOrTvakn AT. x%ulvs PLANT PALETTE PLANTING NOTES I THE PLANTING DESIGN FOR THE SITE IS DROUGHT TOLERANT AND UTILIZES NATIVE AND ADAPTED ORNAMENTAL PLANTING 2 ALL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER MATERIAL SELECTED RASA WUCOLS WATER USE RATING OF LOW OR VERY LOW. 3 PROPOSED TREE CANOPIES ARE SHOWN AT 459A MATURE GROWTH DIAMETER IN ORDER TO ENSURE THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM FOR TREE GROWTH AND HEALTH CALLOUT SCHEDULE V VVNVIfGIt YRI(K YHIM �[G VtINLA, JM[tl L -ll PATHWAY CONNECTIONS TO VAST OAK NDRTH APARTMENTS NON -IRRIGATED NATURAL GRASSLAND/PASSIVE OPEN SPACE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN WASTE RECEPTACLES SEE IMAGE, SHEET L-13 STREET TREES SHADE TREES ACCENTTREES SHADE STRUCTURE WTH PICNIC TABLES SEE IMAGE, SHEET L -t 3 10 PICNIC TABLES SEE IMAGE, SHEET L-13 11 (2) BOCCECOURT SEE DETAILS, SHEET L-1 2 T2 DRINKING FOUNTAIN SEE IMAGE, SHEET LA 3 13 BENCHES SEE IMAGE, SHEET L-13 14 DG PAVING 5EE DETAIL C, SHEET L-1 2 16 CONCRETE PLAZA 16 PLANTED PARKWAYS N IRRIGATION DESIGN 1R9BQATIQNS Y51EM TO UTKJEE CITY PROVIDED RECYCLED WATER Brookfield _ Development 500 LA GONDA WAY DANVILLE, CALIFORNIA 94526 - Area Plan (925)743-0000 PATHWAY CONNECTION TO UNIVERSITY DISTRICT AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS. FINAL ALIGNMENT TO BE DETERMINED - PATHWAY CONNECTION TO UNIVERSITY DISTRICT AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS. FINAL ALIGNMENT TO BE DETERMINED. Vast Oak North at University District VAST OAK NORTH PUBLIC PARK Rohnert Park, California Preliminary verall Landscaoe Desian vanderTooien " Associates LANDSCAPE ARCHRECTS .4 . Dole• D' 16' 3U SG 120' Scale: 1 30'-0" JANUARY 10, 2010 rX OI III, rnr4Cape OIChitKI Rft Iddr bM. use Of 01(0m10M rn Bny Wnn Is VOCW pM AtOISWII"rl w U J a Y O O J w W O I L-1.1 NORTH 1 Project NO 04416 WUCOLS SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME WATER USE STREETTREES `J PISTACIA CHINENSIS'KEITH DAVEY KEITH DAVEY CHINESE LOW I PISTACHE R ��y PLATANUS XACERIFOLIA'COLUMBIA' LONDON PLANE TREE MODERATE ;n rnDE: TRIES OIIERCUDAORTFOUA CAUFORNIA LIVE OAK VERY LOW ACCENTTREES CERCIS OCCIDENTAUS WESTERN REOBUD VERY LOW PRUNUS CERASIFERA-KRAUTER PURPLE LEAF PLUM LOW •� VESUVIUS' IRRIGATE. ORNAMENTAL GROUNDCOVER/GRASSES ANIGOZANTHIIS 5P1. KANGAROO PAW LOW ARCYOSTAPHYLOS BP MANZANITA VERY LOW CEANOTHUSSP CEAHOTHUD LOW CISTUS BPP, ROCKROSE LOW DIETES BICOLOR FORTNIGHT LILY LOW FESTUCA MAIREI ATLAS FESCUE LOW HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS BLUEOATGRASS LOW LEYMUS'CANYON PRINCE' BLUE WILD RYE VERY LOW MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS LOW PHORMIUM SP, NEWZEALAND FLAX LOW PRUNUS CAROUNIANA CAROLINA CHERRY LOW XYLOSMA CONGESTUM SHINYXYLOSMA LOW HYDROSEEDMIX HYDROSEED CARMBELL BLUE 913YflINCHIUM BELLUM 1 318 RIN BUTTECALIFRCUPNIA BUTTERCUP BLUE-EYED GRASS E MIA 30"k TRIFOLIUM WILDENOVII TOMCATCLOVER "-A VULPIA MICROSTACHYS THREE'WEEK FESCUE 10% PLANTING NOTES I THE PLANTING DESIGN FOR THE SITE IS DROUGHT TOLERANT AND UTILIZES NATIVE AND ADAPTED ORNAMENTAL PLANTING 2 ALL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER MATERIAL SELECTED RASA WUCOLS WATER USE RATING OF LOW OR VERY LOW. 3 PROPOSED TREE CANOPIES ARE SHOWN AT 459A MATURE GROWTH DIAMETER IN ORDER TO ENSURE THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM FOR TREE GROWTH AND HEALTH CALLOUT SCHEDULE V VVNVIfGIt YRI(K YHIM �[G VtINLA, JM[tl L -ll PATHWAY CONNECTIONS TO VAST OAK NDRTH APARTMENTS NON -IRRIGATED NATURAL GRASSLAND/PASSIVE OPEN SPACE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN WASTE RECEPTACLES SEE IMAGE, SHEET L-13 STREET TREES SHADE TREES ACCENTTREES SHADE STRUCTURE WTH PICNIC TABLES SEE IMAGE, SHEET L -t 3 10 PICNIC TABLES SEE IMAGE, SHEET L-13 11 (2) BOCCECOURT SEE DETAILS, SHEET L-1 2 T2 DRINKING FOUNTAIN SEE IMAGE, SHEET LA 3 13 BENCHES SEE IMAGE, SHEET L-13 14 DG PAVING 5EE DETAIL C, SHEET L-1 2 16 CONCRETE PLAZA 16 PLANTED PARKWAYS N IRRIGATION DESIGN 1R9BQATIQNS Y51EM TO UTKJEE CITY PROVIDED RECYCLED WATER Brookfield _ Development 500 LA GONDA WAY DANVILLE, CALIFORNIA 94526 - Area Plan (925)743-0000 PATHWAY CONNECTION TO UNIVERSITY DISTRICT AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS. FINAL ALIGNMENT TO BE DETERMINED - PATHWAY CONNECTION TO UNIVERSITY DISTRICT AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS. FINAL ALIGNMENT TO BE DETERMINED. Vast Oak North at University District VAST OAK NORTH PUBLIC PARK Rohnert Park, California Preliminary verall Landscaoe Desian vanderTooien " Associates LANDSCAPE ARCHRECTS .4 . Dole• D' 16' 3U SG 120' Scale: 1 30'-0" JANUARY 10, 2010 rX OI III, rnr4Cape OIChitKI Rft Iddr bM. use Of 01(0m10M rn Bny Wnn Is VOCW pM AtOISWII"rl w U J a Y O O J w W O I L-1.1 NORTH 1 Project NO 04416 rol i 7- 10- CONCRETE PAVING ' SCALE: 1-1/2," = 1'-0" Q) TREE. ® TREE ROOTBALL SET ON CONCRETE CONCRETE PAVING, CiAMETER LODGE POLE LIGHTLY TAMPED SOIL. DO REINFORCING PER SOIL'S REPORT PINE STAKE SET 30" INTO NOT PENETRATE ROOTBALL RECOMMENDATION. GRADE OR UNDISTURBED WITH STAKES. 1/2" TOOLED RADIUS, SUBGRADE A MINIMUM OF 12"O5 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE, BELOW BOTTOM OF © FINISH GRADE. COMPACTION, & THICKNESS PER SOIL'S C REPORT RECOMMENDATION ROOTBALL PLACE STAKES COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR 31"t ENGINEERED FILL 0 1/4" WIDE X 314" DEEP TOOLED CONTROL [s JOINT (SEE PLANS). 7 3/B" WIDE FiBEa: FILLED EXPANSION N 1 JOINT W/POLYSULFIDE SEALANT 3" DEPTH MULCH. SEALANT COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT VIANDS OS FERTILIZER TABLETS- SEE PAVING, SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION OB FINISH GRADE 2' BELOWTOP OF ENLARGEO?X8 PAVING FOR PLANTING AREA Q THICKENED EDGE AT PLANTING AREA 0j WHERE REQWRED OR UNDER WATERPROOFING #1060. PEDESTALS Q) TREE. ® TREE ROOTBALL SET ON ICY -21' CiAMETER LODGE POLE LIGHTLY TAMPED SOIL. DO K+AJ PINE STAKE SET 30" INTO NOT PENETRATE ROOTBALL C -i GRADE OR UNDISTURBED WITH STAKES. AT FRONT FACE. TYP. EXPANSION JOINT SUBGRADE A MINIMUM OF 12"O5 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. 0— \ 'V BELOW BOTTOM OF © FINISH GRADE. 0FINISH GRADE, C 4" COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 95% ROOTBALL PLACE STAKES 36" 31"t V#4 REBAR@ 18" 0 C. BOTH WAYS [s PARALLEL TO PREVAILING AMENDED BACKFILL. [ � (2) 21 GRAM PLANT TABLETS. 1 3" DEPTH MULCH. VIANDS OS FERTILIZER TABLETS- SEE COMPACTEDSUBG RADE OR 2" CRUSHED OYSTER SHELL ENLARGEO?X8 REDWOM WITH CABOT CLEAR RUBBER TWIST TIES - KNOT GENERAL PLANTING NOTES, 0j WATERPROOFING #1060. DIAMETER WITH CALIFORNIA NATIVE SHRUBS, AND ATTACH TO STAKE W/ SHEET L-1, FOR QUANTITY 2. DO NOT USE AMENDED SOIL FOR 3/4"COUNTER SUNK ALL THREAD CALIFORNIA NATIVE SHRUBS. Lr LL ROOFING TACK. PER TREE SIZE. r MAXVNDS E � O—L MICRO CHANNEL DRAIN (GREY) #8003 7WITH A V' — --1 NOTE: -SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANTING PIT. I 4" CLASS II BASE ROCK PREVAILING IMN-FERLTILIZED TABS ARE NOT TO BE USED WITH CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANTS. rLANDSCAPE \:/ -DO NOT USE AMENDED SOIL FOR X CALIFORNIA NATIVE TREES. TWICE ROOTBALL -SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1"ABOVE DIAMETER RUBBER TWIST TIES PLAN GRADE. ELEVATION WRAPPED IN A FIGURE "B" AROUND TRUNK ,,.TREE STAKING IF' N.T.S. V B= ROW SPACING' 1" X 1" 45 CHAMFER AT TOP BOTH SIDES AND -. a ~-•;' F 2"ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 12" AT FRONT FACE. TYP. EXPANSION JOINT 112) 3" HIGH WATERING BASIN. 16" 15"t 0FINISH GRADE, C 4" COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 95% O/4 AMENDED BACKFILL 36" 31"t V#4 REBAR@ 18" 0 C. BOTH WAYS 0.l TAMPED SUPPORT —(A) � (2) 21 GRAM PLANT TABLETS. 3" DEPTH MULCH. COMPACTEDSUBG RADE OR 2" CRUSHED OYSTER SHELL ENLARGEO?X8 REDWOM WITH CABOT CLEAR NOTE: TWICE ROOTBALL WATERPROOFING #1060. DIAMETER WITH CALIFORNIA NATIVE SHRUBS, 2. DO NOT USE AMENDED SOIL FOR 3/4"COUNTER SUNK ALL THREAD CALIFORNIA NATIVE SHRUBS. SHRUB GALVANIZED STEEL ROD WITH LOCKING NUT MAXVNDS E O—L MICRO CHANNEL DRAIN (GREY) #8003 7WITH -r CLEAN OUT SECTION #8553A 4" CLASS II BASE ROCK rLANDSCAPE \:/ AREA PER PLAN NOTE: SEE DETAIL X, SHEET L -X FOR BOCCE BALL IF' SCOREBOARD DAYLIGHT RUNOFF INTO LANDSCAPED WALL ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREA, CONCRETE CURB AT BOCCE COURT B SCALF: 1" = 1'- 0" FINISH GRADE - 2' BELOW TOP OF PAVING AT SHRUB*ROUNDCOVER AREA. 1" BELOW TOP OF PAVING AT TURF AREA 1 X 4 SEND•A•BOARD, LEAVE 1/2" GAP IN SLIP JOINTS AND END RUNS SCREWTO POSTS WITH 2 #16 PLATED DECK SCREWS AVAILABLE THROUGH EPIC PLASTICS " �2x3x18"PLASTIC STAKE ATVO.C.MIN_ DECOMPOSED GRANITE. SEE CONSTRUCTION CALLOUT PLAN, SHEET L -X, FOR COLOR FILTER FABRIC O CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE THICKNESS AND COMPACTION PER SOIL'S REPORT RECOMMENDATION COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR ENGINEERED FILL. DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING SCALE: 1-1/2 = 1'-0" PI ANT CPAr.INr; SCHFDLILE- A =TRIANGULAR SPACING B= ROW SPACING' SHRUB • SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 8" F^ 2"ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 12" -�J 2 112) 3" HIGH WATERING BASIN. 16" 15"t 0FINISH GRADE, Tcc 21"t O/4 AMENDED BACKFILL 36" 31"t SET ROOTBALL ON LIGHTLY 0.l TAMPED SUPPORT —(A) � (2) 21 GRAM PLANT TABLETS. 3" DEPTH MULCH. COMPACTEDSUBG RADE OR ENGINEERED FILL. NOTE: TWICE ROOTBALL 1. FERTILIZER TABS ARE NOT TO BE USED DIAMETER WITH CALIFORNIA NATIVE SHRUBS, 2. DO NOT USE AMENDED SOIL FOR CALIFORNIA NATIVE SHRUBS. SHRUB E NTS, FINISH GRADE - 2' BELOW TOP OF PAVING AT SHRUB*ROUNDCOVER AREA. 1" BELOW TOP OF PAVING AT TURF AREA 1 X 4 SEND•A•BOARD, LEAVE 1/2" GAP IN SLIP JOINTS AND END RUNS SCREWTO POSTS WITH 2 #16 PLATED DECK SCREWS AVAILABLE THROUGH EPIC PLASTICS " �2x3x18"PLASTIC STAKE ATVO.C.MIN_ DECOMPOSED GRANITE. SEE CONSTRUCTION CALLOUT PLAN, SHEET L -X, FOR COLOR FILTER FABRIC O CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE THICKNESS AND COMPACTION PER SOIL'S REPORT RECOMMENDATION COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR ENGINEERED FILL. DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING SCALE: 1-1/2 = 1'-0" PI ANT CPAr.INr; SCHFDLILE- A =TRIANGULAR SPACING B= ROW SPACING' C=PERIMETER SET -BACK 8" 5" t 4- 12" 10 1!2"t 10- 16" 15"t 12" 24 21"t 11" 36" 31"t _ 24"_ u,6nn x A PLANTING GRID: GROUND COVER SPACING CHART r N.T.S. Brookfield Vast Oak North at University District I vandel'rooien•Associates .„",,,,o,,,,,,m Residential Development VAST OAK NORTH PUBLIC PARK °"s=rctr°" �L L-1 .2 .4...., 500 LA GONDA WAY ms's w'w "��.`'�. DANVILLE, CALIFORNIA 99526 Area Plan Landscape Details (925)743.8000 RDhnert Park, California LANDS[MEARcmrrEQS Cw�S, �"`""�"��""""""� Scale: Not Applicable JANUARY 10, 2016 NORTH Project No 04416 Govy.aM 2010 �,Ando1TW n AssaOpgn. Tho &nNrmL or vW.Nn 11 5tannl, Coot—ld bnl Pin CDn501Dto ft av"07and wp"b&u d+.o&*FVW IWOMllylo archRuct RgprpdoC&an, "o or 90*mWoo In any IMtn U VIMLI�r pfoNt.Nad vAnnal TAP vAVWo oonsanl Al nr4W7pQI1MA"*d01t0, c4`... ' ' ' ' . . . ' r 3 GROUND COVER SPACING CHART r N.T.S. Brookfield Vast Oak North at University District I vandel'rooien•Associates .„",,,,o,,,,,,m Residential Development VAST OAK NORTH PUBLIC PARK °"s=rctr°" �L L-1 .2 .4...., 500 LA GONDA WAY ms's w'w "��.`'�. DANVILLE, CALIFORNIA 99526 Area Plan Landscape Details (925)743.8000 RDhnert Park, California LANDS[MEARcmrrEQS Cw�S, �"`""�"��""""""� Scale: Not Applicable JANUARY 10, 2016 NORTH Project No 04416 Govy.aM 2010 �,Ando1TW n AssaOpgn. Tho &nNrmL or vW.Nn 11 5tannl, Coot—ld bnl Pin CDn501Dto ft av"07and wp"b&u d+.o&*FVW IWOMllylo archRuct RgprpdoC&an, "o or 90*mWoo In any IMtn U VIMLI�r pfoNt.Nad vAnnal TAP vAVWo oonsanl Al nr4W7pQI1MA"*d01t0, WASTE RECEPTACLE SHADE STRUCTURE BOCCE COURTS DRINKING FOUNTAIN PICNIC TABLE BENCH Brookfield Vast Oak North at University District uoclates L-1.3Development 500 LAGONDAWAYAr43,'a, VAST OAK NORTH PUBLIC PARKsit hurnshings W�. CALIFORNIA IM525 Plan {� Images(825)703-0000 _DANVILLE, Park, CaliforniaScale: aCNITSCif ".+.n� ...«Rohnert Not Applicable JANUARY 10, 2018 NORTH Project No 0A416 Ctlnrrlala 201 vo;MJ ITvdnn At%Mn tvD- TIw dray rwa gr widirtl naTl"AN tinaA441M llwa9n cNalkute 11X1 wglnal and nmPubFahvd voa% 41 Itw LaadvAm glringoo RVkod.0 an. wi w alWaSnnm ony W "q la sWRV Fed -144 -haul U.s M— eaa:nm 61 -MM Yaalnn Av wlalns Exhibit B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Resolution No, 2018-16 GRIFFIN'S GROVE PARK— AT UNIVERSITY DISTRICT ON-GOING CONDITIONS The conditions below shall apply to the Griffin's Grove Park Project (PLDPXXX) at University District. The Development Area Plan shall be developed in accordance with the General Plan (GP), University District Specific Plan (UDSP) including Design Guidelines, Mitigation Measures (MMs) identified in the UDSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Development Agreement (DA) between the City and University District LLC and Vast Oak Properties L.P., the Rohnert Park Municipal Code (RPMC), and the Design and Construction Standards. General Requirements 1) The applicant shall comply with all documents approved by the City Council and adhere to all verbal representations and exhibits presented by the applicant at the Planning Commission and\or City Council meeting for approval of the University District Specific Plan project unless subsequently revised by the City. 2) The applicant shall comply with the FEIR. In addition the applicant shall pay the cost to monitor the mitigation measures identified in the FEIR for the UDSP Project (SCH # 2003122014) kept on file in the Development Services Department. The requirements contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) shall be incorporated into these conditions and constructed in accordance with the MMP. 3) The applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, elected and appointed officials, and employees, from any and all liability or claims that may be brought against the City arising out of its approval of the Griffin's Grove Park DAP save and except that caused by the City's active negligence. 4) By accepting the benefits conferred under the Griffin's Grove Park DAP, the applicant acknowledges all the conditions imposed and accepts the DAP subject to those conditions with full awareness of the provisions, as may be amended from time to time, and the RPMC, as applicable. 5) The use of the property by the applicant/grantee for any activity authorized by Griffin's Grove Park DAP shall constitute acceptance of all of the conditions and obligations imposed, by the City. The applicant/grantee by said acceptance waives any challenge as to the validity of these conditions. 6) All improvements shall comply with all applicable sections of the City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code and any other applicable relevant plans of affected agencies, unless superseded by the Specific Plan for this property. 7) The development of this project shall be consistent with all other approvals associated with this project (e.g. UDSP/Design Guidelines). 8) The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and clearances from the Rohnert Park Building and Public Safety Departments prior to occupancy of the project. Site flan, Landscaping and Signs 9) All improvements shall be in conformance with the submitted Site Plans, Exterior Elevations, and Landscape Plans, except as modified herein. 10) The applicant shall complete a Lot Line Adjustment between the project site and the adjoining property to the west (University District Affordable Housing Project). 11) Prior to any Grading on this property the applicant shall file for, receive approvals for and cause recordation of a Lot Line Adjustment required by condition of approval 11. 12) All plant materials proposed for use within the project shall be in conformance with the University District Plant Material Matrix contained in Appendix B of the Specific Plan. 13) The design of all entrances to the site shall be subject to Department of Public Safety approval. 14) The designs and locations of decorative paving treatments shall be subject to staff review and approval. 15) The Planning Manager shall have the authority to administratively approve minor variations to the exterior residential color schemes, materials, and finishes that may be subsequently proposed following DAP approval. 16) The project applicant shall design and construct all project facilities in accordance with the most recent seismic standards of the California Building Standards Code. 17) The applicant shall design and construct the foundations and/or building pads for all project structures using standard engineering practices that account for, and minimize damage resulting from, expansive soil conditions. Specific design and constructed methods shall be as directed by Mitigation Measure GEO-8a of the FEIR for this project. 18) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by Planning Staff and the City Engineer. Such plans shall be in substantial conformance with the plan submitted as a part of this application. 19) All trees within five feet of the public right-of-way shall have root barriers that are approved by the Engineering Division. 20) A permanent automatic sprinkler shall be installed to maintain all landscape materials and areas. 21) The applicant's engineer shall coordinate with the City Engineer to ensure that recycled water is used for irrigation of the project's landscaping, if available. 22) All exterior lighting shall be designed so as to prevent any spillover lighting onto adjacent properties and rights-of-way. New lighting levels provided shall be compatible with general illumination levels in existing areas to avoid a noticeable contrast in light emissions, consistent with the need to provide for safety and security. 23) Any existing overhead and proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Construction Mitigation 24) For any project requiring an on-site inspector to monitor grading, the applicant shall deposit funds with the City to cover the full cost of an inspector prior to any land disturbance. The City Engineer, as appropriate, shall approve the amount and hire the inspector. 25) The developer shall comply with construction hours pursuant to Rohnert Park Municipal Code Section 9.44.120. 26) All construction material waste and other debris shall be recycled to the extent feasible. The applicant shall present a "clean site everyday" program to City building staff for approval. The program shall include on-site signage in English and Spanish to be posted at construction entrances. No animals shall be brought on site by construction personnel during work hours. 27) All material storage areas shall be fenced with at least a 6 -foot high chain link fence with at least two separate points of access with sufficient width for emergency vehicles. The access points shall be shown on the construction fire and security protection site plan. City of Rohnert Park Parks and Recreation Commission Report DATE: January 18, 2018 ITEM No: SUBJECT: Consideration of a Development Area Plan for UDSP Affordable Housing Project and Griffin's Grove Park LOCATION: Within the University District Specific Plan Area (9.13 acre lot and 6.72 park site) located on the southeast corner of Keiser Avenue and the Kerry Road (future roadway). APPLICANT: Pacific West Communities proposal The applicant is seeking approval for a Development Area Plan (DAP) for the University District Specific Plan (UDSP), Affordable Housing Project and the adjacent Griffin's Grove Park. The two components of the DAP are further described as follows: UDSP Affordable Housing Project (Pacific West Communities). Pacific West is proposing to develop the 9.13 -acre University District Affordable Housing property into a 218 -unit affordable rental housing development. The project proposes a total of 116,146 square feet of open space area, which includes a total of 97,953 square feet of public outdoor open space, a 1,538 square foot community building, and a total 16,655 square feet of private open space area (within enclosed patios for each unit). The public open space is provided in a linear park configuration with the community building located at the west end of the linear park and two play areas on each end of the park. The park component of the development also includes two barbeque areas, a dog park area and a large open lawn area within the center of the linear park. Pedestrian paths provide interconnectedness between the two play areas and the community building and the other park amenities. In addition, the pedestrian paths direct tenants to crosswalks that lead to the nearby Griffin's Grove Park located just west of the project site. The project proposes a total of 443 parking spaces, 40 of which will be located along the east property boundary with portion of these spaces encroaching onto the adjacent Griffin's Grove Park. This will require a 10 -foot lot line adjustment to allow for the placement of the parking spaces. 2. Griffin's Grove Park. The design for this park (formerly known as Oak Grove Park) was approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission back in 2014 along with approval of the UDSP Specific Plan. This park is intended to be "passive" in character. The focus of park Page 1 improvements is to protect Oak trees on the site and protect that natural features as much as possible. Walking paths were included with the original design. The new design for Griffin's Grove Park will continue to protect the Oak trees and keep the park "passive" in character but add a few amenities in the southeast corner of the park (Bocce Ball courts, picnic tables and a shade structure). Review by the Parks and Recreation Commission is being specifically requested because the proposed project will affect the size of the Park and amenities are to be added. The eastern edge of the park will be reduced by less than 10 feet (0.11 acres), which is a very slight reduction in size (approximately 1.6%). Staff is also requesting that the commission weigh in on the amenities to be added (the Bocce Ball courts, picnic tables and shelter). The commission has expressed a desire in the past that this park remain "passive" in character and it is the opinion of Staff that the added amenities are consistent with this character. Background The University District Specific Plan ("Specific Plan") is one of five specific plan areas designated in the City's General Plan for future development. The Specific Plan includes approximately 300 acres of lands owned by five property owners (University District LLC, Vast Oak Properties, Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District, Gee, and Linden) in the City of Rohnert Park. In 2006, the University District Specific Plan was approved and the Specific Plan Area was subsequently annexed into the City. Subsequent to the 2006 approvals, the project applicant submitted applications proposing to amend the Specific Plan including changes to the Parks component of the Specific Plan, which would result in increases in total park acreage and reconfigured park layouts. The proposed park changes were considered by the Parks and Recreation Commission on July 13, 2013 and received consideration of a preliminary plan by the Planning Commission on June 27, 2013 and by the City Council on July 23, 2013. The applicant was provided with comments and guidance in proceeding with preparation of a formal application for Specific Plan Amendment. In April 2014, the City Council approved revisions to the adopted Specific Plan, including amendment to the park plans that included a 6.83 -acre park within Vast Oaks West (Twin Creeks Park) and a 6.83 -acre park within Vast Oaks North (Griffin's Grove Park). The proposed project would modify the size of Griffin's Grove Park by approximately 4,850 square feet. General Plan Rohnert Park's General Plan 2000, Chapter 5 Open Space, Parks, and Public Facilities, includes goals and policies for development and preservation of parks and open space within the City with an overall goal of providing an integrated system of parks and trails throughout the City, to continue to develop additional parkland with new development proposals, and to ensure existing parks and recreation facilities are well maintained and provide a safe and secure recreational opportunities. The applicant is required to provide a total of 87,200 square feet of open space on the apartment site. The applicant proposes to comply by exceed their obligation of total public and private open space within the development by over 28,000 square feet. While the property proposes a lot line adjustment thus reducing the size of Griffin's Grove Park, the applicant is working with the proponent of the University District to assure that there are adequate park connections from the project site open space areas to the adjacent park and that pedestrian connections align thus providing a link between the two park areas. In addition, the UDSP proponent has submitted a site plan for the Griffin's Grove Park amenities that include trail connections, a plaza with benches and shade structures, a bocce court, and a drinking fountain. Staff Analysis: Described above, the University District Specific Plan identifies a site of 9.13 acres to accommodate a 218 unit affordable housing project and a site of 6.83 acres located within the Vast Oak North neighborhood and identified as Griffin's Grove Park. The proposed development is for a 218 -unit affordable housing development that includes parking spaces along the common property boundary between Griffin's Grove Park and the project site and would require a lot line adjustment to allow the development to accommodate all of the required parking for the site. The proponent for the University District Specific Plan Area has provided a site plan demonstrating how Griffin's Grove Park would be developed with amenities that include trails, a park plaza, shade structures and benches and a bocce ball court. The affordable housing development would not affect any of the amenities proposed for the park project. In addition, the affordable housing project would include a total of 116,146 square feet of park area which is over 28,000 square feet more than what is required for this development. Environmental Determination Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Rohnert Park, as the lead agency, has conducted an environmental review of the Project. The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to address the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may be associated with the planning, constriction, or operation of the Project and to identify appropriate and feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to significantly reduce or avoid the impacts identified in the EIR. The City certified the Final EIR on May 23, 2006 and approved an Addendum to the Final EIR on April 8, 2014. The proposed project was evaluated as part of the UDSP EIR and thus is consistent with the analysis in the EIR and Addendum and would not result in additional environmental effects. Therefore, no additional environmental review is necessary. Staff Recommendation: Based on the information presented in this report, City staff is recommending that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend to the Planning Commission approval of the proposed Development Area Plan for the UDSP Affordable Housing Project and Griffin's Grove Park. Attachments: A. Resolution B. Project Site Plan with Landscape Plans C. Griffin's Grove Park Site Plan and Landscape Plans APPROPALS: Tc11} y,Beiswenger Planil `ng Manager Date PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2018-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN FOR THE UDSP AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT AND GRIFFIN'S GROVE PARK APN: 159-550-007 AND 159-550-008 WHEREAS, the approval of a Development Area Plan (DAP) entitlement is requested within the University District Specific Plan (UDSP) to allow for construction of an affordable housing project and the design for the adjacent Griffin's Grove Park WHEREAS, Pacific West Communities proposes development of a 9.1 acre parcel into a 218 -unit multi -family affordable housing development with 443 parking spaces and 116,146 square feet of parks and open space area located at within the UDSP in Rohnert Park; and WHEREAS, Pacific West is exceeding the project's open space obligation by over 28,000 square feet. WHEREAS, the master developer (Brookfield Homes) proposes development of 6.8 acres Griffin's Grove Park as part of the construction of the northern portion of the UDSP project; WHEREAS, the proposal will require a lot line adjustment to allow the affordable housing developer to accommodate all of the project's required parking spaces will reduce the size of the adjoining Griffin's Grove Park by 0.1 acre; and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission review is requested to inform the DAP approval by the Planning Commission and City Council and allow for the lot line adjustment; and WHEREAS, the proposed DAP and lot line adjustment is consistent with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and the UDSP. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DOES DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. The proposed DAP and lot line adjustment are consistent with the UDSP and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Section 2. That the proposed affordable housing project's open space area exceeds the is obligation for the multi -family development by over 28,000 square feet and thus conforms with the General Plan; Section 3. That the request to adjust the easterly property boundary would reduce the area of Griffin's Grove Park by 4,850 square feet (.l 1 acres) to 6.72 acres which meets or exceeds the park dedication requirements for the overall UDSP; Section 4. That the resulting size, layout, configuration and amenities of Griffin's Grove park are consistent with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Development Services is hereby authorized and directed to forward this resolution to Planning Commission in support of its review of the DAP for the University District Affordable Housing Project and Griffin's Grove Park. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 181h day of January, 2018 by the following vote: AYES: -j NOES: 0 ABSENT: '�, ABSTAIN:0 BIRD BLACK CANTERBURY BORR GRIFFIN i G f Vii%44a + . Chairperson City of Rohnert, Park Parks and Recreation �C'oinniission Attest:6J.Ul Angela BeraAfi-�corciing Secretary AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT University District Specific Plan EIR Consistency Review 19 ,01iNERT P.4 �AL1FC]RNi► City of Rohnert Park Development Services 130 Avram Avenue Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486 .JANUARY 2018 I. Introduction and Overview University District Specific Plan The proposed University District Affordable Housing project (the "proposed project") would be located within the University District Specific Plan (UDSP) area in the City of Rohnert Park. The UDSP consists of approximately 300 -acres of lands located on each side of Hinebaugh Creek, south of Keiser Avenue, west of Petaluma Hill Road, and north of Copeland Creek. The Plan area includes the Vast Oak property, the UD LLC property, Gee property, Abu-Halawa (Linden) property, and property owned by the Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District (CRPUSD). The City approved the University District Specific Plan document (the "Specific Plan") in 2006 and associated General Plan amendments were adopted and implemented. The Specific Plan guides development of the UDSP area, which is intended to be a mixed-use pedestrian -oriented community providing diverse residential opportunities and a commercial center to accommodate the needs of new and existing neighborhoods; Sonoma State University students, faculty, and staff; and patrons of the City's Community Center and the Green Music Center. The Specific Plan adopted in 2006 provides for development of up to 1,645 total dwelling units, 126 second units, parks and open space, and 175,000 gross square feet (sf) of neighborhood serving commercial, retail, and office space. The Affordable Housing project site is located in the north -central portion of the UDSP area on the Vast Oak property, bordered by Keiser Avenue on the north and the Kerry Road alignment to the west. The Oak Grove Park, a component of the adopted Specific Plan, is located to the immediate east of the project site. To the south of the site is new residential development within the UDSP area. In the current Specific Plan (revised in 2014), the project site is designated High Density Residential and is the assumed location for development of all 218 of the high density residential dwelling units planned for in the UDSP. UDSP Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Addendums In 2006, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CECIA), the City prepared an EIR to analyze the impacts associated with implementation of the 2006 Specific Plan (the "2006 EIR"). The 2006 EIR assumed development of a total of 1,610 dwelling units without secondary units (1,736 total units including secondary units), and up to 250,000 square feet of commercial center/plaza uses (including a hotel). Of the 1,610 total dwelling units in the UDSP, the 2006 EIR assumed that 630 units would be high density residential (476 units would be located on the Vast Oak property and 154 would be on the UD LLC property). The 2006 EIR includes a project -level analysis for the UD LLC and Vast Oak properties within the UDSP area and a program -level analysis for the Abu-Halawa (Linden), Gee, and CRPUSD properties. In 2014, proposed changes to the Specific Plan (the "2014 Project") were analyzed in a CEQA addendum, Evaluation of Proposed Amendments to the University District Specific Plan (the "2014 Addendum"). The features in the 2014 Project were to occur on the same site as the approved Specific Plan with proposed amendments to include different locations for specific project features, changes to development acreage and land use densities, changes to park sizes and locations, an increase to the size of a stormwater detention basin, and new bike lanes. The 2014 Project proposed no changes to the total number of residential units in comparison to the 2006 Specific Plan (1,645 total), but proposed to reconfigure the gross acreage for each designation and change the number of residential units by land use designation. For the high density residential, the 2014 Project proposed to reduce the total acreage of land designated for such uses and proposed to reduce total number of units from 630, as assumed in the 2006 EIR, to 218 units in total. The location of the high density residential units was proposed to be shifted to the north 2 along Keiser Avenue and adjacent to the western boundary of Oak Grove Park, in an area previously designated as low density and medium density residential in the 2006 Specific Plan. The analysis in the 2014 Addendum concluded that the amended project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were analyzed in the 2006 EIR. In April 2014, the City approved the 2014 Addendum and amended the Specific Plan to include the proposed changes. In 2016, the City prepared another CEQA addendum, Evaluation of the University District Water Tank (City Tank #8) Project (the "2016 Addendum"), to analyze the revisions to the 2006 EIR resulting from new project -level details for a water supply tank and storage infrastructure to serve the Specific Plan area the "Water Tank Project"). While the 2006 Program EIR and the 2014 Addendum described and analyzed the offsite water supply tank and associated access road and infrastructure, the specific project -level details were unknown. The 2016 Addendum concluded that the proposed Water Tank Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts than that disclosed in the 2006 Program EIR and 2014 Addendum. In the 2006 Program EIR, 2014 Addendum, and 2016 Addendum potential impacts were analyzed from the viewpoint of the following 13 environmental resource areas: • Aesthetics • Agriculture Resources, Land Use and Planning • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Noise • Population and Housing Public Services • Transportation and Traffic • Utilities and Service Systems • Water Resources In addition to the resource topics listed above, required CEQA considerations including growth -inducing impacts, cumulative impacts, significant and unavoidable impacts, and significant and irreversible environmental changes were also evaluated. Based on the environmental analyses included in the 2006 EIR, the City determined that the Specific Plan, in conjunction with cumulative development within the City of Rohnert Park, would result in a significant and unavoidable impact associated with aesthetics/visual resources and land use as it relates to the loss of open space lands; agriculture as it relates to the conversion of agricultural lands; the cumulative effect on air quality, biological resources, and noise; traffic as it relates to increased congestion at Adobe Road/Petaluma Hill Road in Penngrove, the East Cotati/Old Redwood Highway intersection, and the Adobe Road/Petaluma Hill Road and Main Street/Old Redwood Highway intersections in Penngrove. The 2006 EIR concluded that implementation of the Specific Plan would have significant and unavoidable impacts to aesthetics/visual resources at it relates to the damage of scenic resources; agriculture as it relates to the conversion of farm land to non-agricultural use; air quality as it relates to operational increases in emissions beyond the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) threshold levels and inconsistency with the 2000 Clean Air Plan; cultural resources as it relates to potential adverse impacts on historic structures within the Specific Plan area; noise as it relates to exposure of existing offsite noise - sensitive land uses to cumulative traffic noise; traffic as it relates to increased congestion at Adobe Road/Petaluma Hill Road in Penngrove, the East Cotati/Old Redwood Highway intersection, and Adobe Road/Petaluma Hill Road and Main Street/Old Redwood Highway intersections in Penngrove. 3 All other environmental impacts were determined to be less than significant or less than significant with implementation of identified mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR. In compliance with CEQA, and to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation measures, the City adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the 2006 EIR. The MMRP was adopted concurrently with the 2006 EIR. Both the 2014 and 2016 Addendums concluded that their respective projects would be consistent with the 2006 EIR and neither would result in new or substantially more severe impacts than those previously disclosed and assessed in the 2006 EIR. Note: The UDSP EIR and EIR Addendums are available for review during normal business hours at City Hall, 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, CA 94928 University District Affordable Housing Project Because the site proposed for the proposed project is located within the UDSP area, this analysis has been prepared to evaluate the consistency of the proposed project with the 2006 EIR and EIR Addendums. An overview of the proposed project is presented below. Section II of this document discusses the environmental impacts, by resource topic, followed by a brief analysis of the proposed project's environmental effects related to the EIR impact conclusions and applicability of EIR mitigation measures. Project Description The proposed project would develop 218 multifamily units, consisting of 27 single bedroom units, 141 two bedroom units, and 50 three bedroom units, on the approximately 9.22 acre project site within the Vast Oak North neighborhood of the UDSP. The units would be constructed at a density of 24 units per acre and would be contained within nine 3 -story walk-up buildings. One-half of proposed units would be rented to very low income residents and the other half would be rented to low income residents. The proposed project would also construct an approximately 3,087 sf single story Community Center, which would include a community room, exercise room, office, maintenance room, 2 halls, restrooms, a laundry room, storage closets, and a kitchen. A central lawn area is proposed in the middle of the site, surrounded by two children's play lots and picnic areas with barbeques to the west and east. The project would also include on-site laundry, mail delivery facilities, and a small dog park. Approximately 97,953 sf of public outdoor open space is proposed surrounding the buildings. These areas would be landscaped with grass areas surrounding buildings, and trees, shrubs, and groundcover throughout the project site. Trees would be also placed around the border of the site. Access to the site would be provided from Kerry Road, which would be extended to the west of the project site to Keiser Avenue, and from O'Ryan Road, a new public street which would be constructed to the south of the project site. A total of 443 vehicle parking spaces and 72 bicycle parking spaces would be available in the proposed development, with an additional 30 on street vehicle parking spaces provided. 100 of the 443 parking spaces proposed are planned as tandem spaces. Affordable Housing Location and Land Uses: The project site is located in the north -central portion of the UDSP area, bordered by Keiser Avenue on the north, the Kerry Road alignment to the west, lands of Oak Grove Park to the east, and new development within the UDSP to the south. The project site has historically supported farming since the 4 early 1900s. Nearby uses include Twin Creeks Park to the south below Kincade Place, the Mulberry at University District residential area to the southeast, the Santa Rosa Community Garden and Lawrence E. Jones Middle School to the west, vacant graded lots to the southeast, and other vacant lots dominated by annual grassland to the north, west, and east. As stipulated in the Specific Plan document, the land use designation for the proposed project site is High Density Residential, and the City's zoning designation for the site is Specific Plan. EIR Impact Analysis Consistency Review This section discusses the environmental impacts included in the 2006 EIR, by resource topic, followed by a brief analysis of the proposed project's consistency with each of the impact conclusions and applicability of the 2006 EIR mitigation measures. AESTHETICS AES -1: Obstruct or Adversely Affect Scenic Vistas or Change Visual Character during Construction The 2006 EIR concluded that construction -related visual impacts in the Specific Plan area would be less than significant for all viewers other than residents of Redwood Park Estates and significant for residents of Redwood Park Estates. The 2006 EIR further concluded that, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AES -1, which provides for installation of temporary visual barriers between construction zones and residences at Redwood Park Estates, this impact would be reduced to a less than significant level. Development of the Affordable Housing project would be within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. Project construction near identified sensitive viewers would occur in similar areas and for similar types of structures (e.g. height, massing and design) as described in the 2006 EIR. Development type and associated intensities and densities at the site would be consistent with the assumptions in the 2014 Addendum. No new aesthetic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior -identified impacts to scenic vistas or change in visual character would occur under the proposed project. AES -2: Obstruct or Adversely Affect Scenic Vistas or Change Visual Character during Operation This impact was found to be less than significant in the 2006 EIR. The project site was included within the development footprint assessed in the 2006 EIR and the proposed development of high density residential units on the proposed project site was anticipated in the 2014 Project and assessed in the 2014 Addendum. In the 2014 Addendum, it was determined that this impact would remain consistent with the 2006 EIR. Thus, implementation of the proposed project would not be expected to increase visual impacts. No new aesthetic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior scenic vista impacts would be expected to result from the proposed project. AES -3: Substantially Damage Scenic Resources, Including, but not limited to, Trees, Rock Outcroppings, and Historic Buildings along a Scenic Highway during Construction and Operation Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would not change effects identified in the 2006 EIR associated with the change in land uses within the UDSP area from agriculture to urban on Petaluma Hill Road, a designated scenic roadway. Development under the proposed project would occur within the development footprint assessed in the 2006 UDSP EIR. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior scenic resources impacts would be expected to result from implementation of the proposed project. 5 AES -4: Create Temporary Sources of Light and Glare during Construction As noted in the 2006 EIR, construction activities associated with development within the UDSP would occur during normal business hours and would thus not create new sources of light and/or glare. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and construction activities would be consistent with other development within the UDSP and occur during normal business hours. Accordingly, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior light and glare impacts would be expected to result from the proposed project. AES -5: Create Permanent Sources of Light and Glare The 2006 EIR concluded that no substantial sources of glare would be created once the UDSP has been constructed. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. Accordingly, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior glare impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. The 2006 EIR concluded that development within the UDSP would increase the amount of light from the site that adjacent residents view during the nighttime hours, where no light sources existed (at the time of the preparation of the 2006 EIR). To ensure that lighting impacts remain less than significant, the 2006 EIR included Mitigation Measure AES -5a requiring lighting design to be shielded and directed downward in compliance with City standards. With implementation of Mitigation Measure AES -5a, impacts associated with the proposed project would be less than significant and consistent with the 2006 EIR. Applicable EIR Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure AES -5a: Require Lighting Design to be Shielded and Directed Downward in Compliance with City Standards AES -6: Conflict with Local Policies The 2006 EIR concluded the UDSP is consistent with applicable aesthetic, scenic corridor, and lighting policies. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would therefore be consistent with the same aesthetic, scenic corridor, and lighting policies. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior aesthetic impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES, LAND USE AND PLANNING AG -1: Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to Non - Agricultural Use The 2006 EIR concluded development within the UDSP would not convert prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance to non-agricultural use. Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would not affect any additional land. Therefore, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior agricultural -related impacts would be expected to occur with development of the proposed project. AG -2: Conflict with Existing Zoning for Agricultural Use or a Williamson Act Contract— University District Specific Plan Area The 2006 EIR concluded that development of the UDSP would not conflict with agricultural zoning or with Williamson Act Contracts. Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would not affect any additional land. Therefore, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior agricultural -related impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. AG -3: Conflict with Existing Zoning for Agricultural Use or a Williamson Act Contract—Offsite Water Tank Site The 2006 EIR concluded that development of the UDSP would require cancellation of the Williamson Act Contract on the water tank site. Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would result in no changes to the water tank site. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior agricultural -related impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the Affordable Housing project. AG -4: Conversion of Farmland to Non -Agricultural Use The 2006 EIR concluded development of the UDSP would convert farmland to non-agricultural use. Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would not affect any additional land. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior agricultural -related impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. LUP-1: Loss of Community Cohesion The 2006 EIR concluded development of the UDSP would not impact an existing community but would impact only vacant and previously farmed lands. Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and affect no other lands. Therefore, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior land use impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. LUP-2: Conflict with Relevant Plans and Policies The 2006 EIR concluded development of the UDSP would not conflict with adopted plans and policies for the Plan area and the UDSP would be consistent with the General Plan. The proposed Affordable Housing project is consistent with planned development within the UDSP Area and the proposed development type and associated intensities and densities at the site would be consistent with the assumptions in the 2014 Addendum. The project would be compatible with adjacent uses. For these reasons, the proposed project would not result in any new conflicts with relevant plans and policies and this impact would be consistent with the 2006 EIR. LUP-3: Conflict with Conservation Plans No conservation plans affecting the site were identified in the 2006 EIR and none have been adopted for the site since 2006. Consequently, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior land use impacts would occur with the proposed project. LUP-4: Construction -Related Effects on Existing Land Uses The 2006 EIR determined that the seven phases of development could cause potential temporary construction -related impacts to adjacent land uses. This impact was found to be less than significant in the 2006 EIR. Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint assessed in the 2006 EIR. Accordingly, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior land use impacts would occur following adoption of the Affordable Housing project. 7 LUP-5: Compatibility with Existing or Future Adjacent Land Uses The proposed project would not result in land uses on the project site that are incompatible with existing adjacent land uses. Development proposed with the Affordable Housing project would occur within the development footprint analyzed in the 2006 EIR. Accordingly, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior land use compatibility impacts would be expected to occur under the proposed project. AIR QUALITY AQ -1: Significant Emissions of Pollutants from Construction of Buildings (Residential and Commercial) for Proposed Development of the University District Specific Plan The 2006 EIR concluded that construction of the UDSP would result in significant air pollutant emissions. The Affordable Housing project would be developed within the same footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would construct a portion of the high density residential units assumed in the 2006 EIR. As noted in the 2014 Addendum, the updated Air Quality study prepared for the 2014 Project, which assumed development of the Affordable Housing at the proposed project site, concluded that emissions resulting from buildout of the UDSP would be less than those modeled for the 2006 EIR. Implementation of the 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures AQ 1-a and AQ 1-b, which require that the project ensure consistency with BAAQMD guidelines for reducing construction impacts, would ensure that construction related air quality impacts remain less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ 1-a and AQ 1-b, no new significant construction -related air quality impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior construction air quality impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure AQ -1a: Minimize Dust Emissions and Ensure Consistency with Bay Area Air Quality Management District Guidelines for Reducing Construction Impacts Mitigation Measure AQ -1b: Implement Additional Control Measures to Minimize Construction - Related Emissions of Criteria Pollutants AQ -2: Operational Increases in Emissions beyond Bay Area Air Quality Management District Threshold Levels The 2006 EIR concluded development of the UDSP would result in significant ROG, NOx, CO and PM10 emissions associated with vehicular traffic and area source emissions. As noted in the 2014 Addendum, development of the 2014 Project would occur within the same development footprint as the 2006 project, with slightly reduced levels of residential units (including high density residential) as assessed in the 2006 EIR. The updated Air Quality study prepared for the 2014 Addendum indicated that emissions resulting from buildout of the UDSP would be less than the emissions modeled in the 2006 EIR. Mitigation Measure AQ -2a requires development projects within the UDSP to utilize measures, as identified in the URBEMIS model, to minimize air pollutant emissions. With implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ -2a, the proposed project would result in no new significant operations -related air quality impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior air quality impacts identified in the 2006 EIR. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure AQ -2a: Utilize Measures Identified in URBEMIS 2002 Model to Minimize Air Pollutant Emissions Associated with the Proposed Projects AQ -3: Localized Increases in Carbon Monoxide Concentrations at Intersections Affected by the University District Specific Plan Development The 2006 EIR found that development of the UDSP would result in increased CO concentrations, but the increases were less than significant. As discussed in the 2014 Addendum, due to the reduction in trip generation under the 2014 Project, the updated Air Quality study indicated that emissions resulting from the proposed project would be less than modeled in the 2006 EIR. No new significant operations -related air quality impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior air quality impacts would be expected to occur with development of the Affordable Housing project. AQ -4: Creation of Objectionable Odors by Sources Associated with the University District Specific Plan The 2006 EIR found that development of the UDSP would not cause odor impacts. Because the type of development associated with the proposed project was assumed in the 2006 EIR, there would be no change in this impact. No new significant odor impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior odor impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the Affordable Housing project. AQ -5: Inconsistency with the 2000 Clean Air Plan Caused by Growth Associated with the University District Specific Plan The 2006 EIR concluded that the UDSP would be inconsistent with the 2000 Clean Air Plan due to increased vehicle mile traveled (VMT) with the City of Rohnert Park General Plan and the UDSP. The 2006 EIR determined that the inconsistency with the 2000 Clean Air Plan would result in a significant and unavoidable impact. The proposed Affordable Housing project would be developed with the planned uses for the site, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum. No new significant operations -related air quality impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior air quality impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. Climate Change and GHG An updated Air Quality study prepared for the 2014 Addendum quantified GHG emissions resulting from the 2006 Specific Plan and the 2014 Project, and concluded that GHG reduction measures incorporated into the revised Specific Plan (2014 Project) would reduce GHG emissions below those resulting from the 2006 Specific Plan and would be below the BAAQMD threshold of significance. No new significant operations -related air quality impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any climate change and GHG impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO -1: Direct Loss of Approximately 21.80 Acres of Waters of the United States (Including Wetlands) and 6.57 Acres of Non -Jurisdictional Wetlands The 2006 EIR concluded project construction within the Vast Oak portion of the UDSP would result in the direct loss of an approximately 17.53 acres of waters of the United States, including wetlands, and 6.22 acres of waters of the state. Construction within UD LLC would result in direct loss of 0.10 acre of water of the United States and 0.46 acre of waters of the state. Construction of the potable water tank would 0.06 acre of waters of the United States. The 2006 EIR also stated that an additional 1.28 acres of waters of the United States, including wetlands, would be filled during construction and restoration activities on the Anderson 48 Mitigation Area. Since the 2006 EIR was certified, wetlands mitigation has been completed on the Anderson 48 site and the scenic corridor on the Vast Oak East site. Development of the Affordable Housing project would occur within the same area assessed in the 2006 EIR and would result Cl in no changes to waters of the United States. This impact would not change as a result of the proposed project. 13I0-2: Direct Loss of Approximately 0.06 Acre of Jurisdictional Seasonal Wetlands for Construction of the Potable Water Pipeline and Access Road The 2006 EIR concluded project construction for the potable water line and access road in Vast Oak East would result in the direct loss of an approximately 0.06 acre of seasonal wetland. Development of the Affordable Housing project would occur within the development footprint assessed in the 2006 EIR and would result in no changes to the potable water line. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior wetlands -related impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project BIO -3: Potential Loss of Waters of the United States, Including Wetlands, on the Abu-Halawa; Gee, and Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District Properties As noted in the 2006 EIR, a wetlands survey was not conducted on the Abu-Halawa (Linden), Gee, or CRPUSD properties. As such, the 2006 EIR included Mitigation Measure BIO -3 to require project proponents for development on those properties to conduct a wetland evaluation to ensure that the site does not support potentially jurisdictional wetlands. Development of the Affordable Housing project would not occur on the Abu-Halawa (Linden), Gee, or CRPUSD properties. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the wetlands -related impacts to those properties would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. BIO -4: Disturbance of Riparian Vegetation The 2006 EIR concluded that construction within the UDSP area could impact riparian vegetation along Copeland and Hinebaugh Creeks but noted that measures included in the UDSP project would ensure that the impact was less than significant. As discussed in the 2006 EIR, a riparian restoration plan was prepared for implementation by the UD LLC and Vast Oak properties. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to riparian vegetation would be expected to occur. BIO -5: Potential Disturbance of Riparian Habitat during Construction The 2006 EIR concluded that construction within the UDSP area could impact riparian vegetation along Copeland and Hinebaugh Creeks. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. Consistent with the 2006 EIR, the project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure BIO -5, which requires the installation of construction barrier fencing to protect sensitive onsite biological resources, to ensure that inadvertent impacts to sensitive biological resources remain less than significant. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to riparian vegetation would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EPR Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure BIO -5a: Install Construction Barrier Fencing to Protect Sensitive Biological Resources Adjacent to the Construction Zone BIO -6: Potential Disturbance of Oak Woodland The 2006 EIR concluded project construction within the UDSP area would potentially disturb oak woodland adjacent to Keiser Road in the northern portion of the study area. The 2006 EIR indicated that 10 the UDSP would preserve this area as the future Oak Grove Park. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and on the site adjacent to the Oak Grove Park. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to oak woodland habitat would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. BIO -7: Potential Disturbance of Oak Woodland for Construction of the Potable Water Pipeline and Tank The 2006 EIR concluded construction on the water tank site and installation of the potable water line would potentially disturb oak woodland. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would result in no changes to the water tank site. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to oak woodland habitat would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. BIO -8: Potential Loss of Special -Status Plants The 2006 EIR concluded project construction within the UDSP area would avoid impacts to Lobb's aquatic buttercup population on Vast Oak East, but could result in the potential loss of special status plant species on the CRPUSD, Gee, and Abu-Halawa (Linden) portions of the UDSP. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 project. ,No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to special status plant habitat would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. BIO -9: Disturbance of Central California Coast Steelhead and Degradation of Habitat The 2006 EIR identified an approximately 1,700 -foot reach of Copeland Creek as a potential steelhead migration corridor. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would not impact Copeland Creek. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to steelhead would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. BIO -10: Potential Disturbance of California Tiger Salamanders and Their Habitat The 2006 EIR identified the potential for impacts to the California tiger salamander (CTS). Multi-year CTS larval surveys conducted between 1994 and 2003 and five years of aquatic surveys conducted at the Anderson 48 Mitigation Site between 2007 and 2011 confirm that CTS do not occur on the property. There has been no recent data to suggest that development within the Vast Oak and UD LLC properties would impact CTS. These properties are also located outside the recently designated critical habitat for the Sonoma CTS. Accordingly, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to steelhead would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. BIO -11: Potential Disturbance or Mortality of Foothill Yellow -Legged Frogs The 2006 EIR indicated foothill yellow -legged frogs are known to occur in Copeland Creek. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would not impact Copeland Creek. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to foothill yellow -legged frogs would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. BIO -12: Potential Disturbance or Mortality of Northwestern Pond Turtles The 2006 EIR indicated Northwestern pond turtle are known to occur in Copeland Creek or Hinebaugh Creek. Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint as the 2006 Project and would not be expected to impact any greater segments of 11 Copeland and Hinebaugh Creeks. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to Northwestern pond turtle would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure BIO -12a: Conduct a Preconstruction Survey for Northwestern Pond Turtles in Suitable Uplands. BIO -13: Potential Loss or Disturbance of Breeding or Wintering Burrowing Owl The 2006 EIR concluded project construction within the UDSP area could potentially impact burrowing owl habitat. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to burrowing owl habitat would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure BIO -13a: Conduct Preconstruction Surveys for Active Burrowing Owl Burrows and Implement the California Department of Fish and Game Guidelines for Burrowing Owl Mitigation, if Necessary BIO -14: Potential Disturbance of Special -Status and Non -Special -Status Tree-, Shrub-, and Ground - Nesting Migratory Birds and Raptors The 2006 EIR concluded project construction within the UDSP area could potentially impact special status and non -special status bird habitat and migratory birds. Implementation of 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures BIO -5a, discussed previously, along with Mitigation Measure BIO -14a, which provides measures for avoiding impacts to nesting birds and raptors, would reduce potential construction -related impacts to nesting birds a less than significant level. With implementation of these measures, the proposed project would be consistent with the 2006 EIR and would result in no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts to nesting migratory birds and raptors. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure BIO -5a: Install Construction Barrier Fencing to Protect Sensitive Biological Resources Adjacent to the Construction Zone Mitigation Measure BI0-14a: Avoid Disturbance of Tree-, Shrub-, and Ground -Nesting Special - Status and Non—Special-Status Migratory Birds BIO -15: Introduction or Spread of Noxious Weeds The 2006 EIR concluded project construction within the UDSP area could introduce the spread of noxious weeds currently not in the area. Implementation of the guidelines outlined in Mitigation Measure 1310- 15a would reduce this impact to a less -than -significant level. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -15a, the project would be consistent with the 2006 EIR and result in no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure BIO -15a: Avoid the Introduction or Spread of Noxious Weeds into Previously Uninfested Areas 12 CULTURAL RESOURCES C-1: Adverse Impacts on P-49-3158 The 2006 EIR concluded project construction within the UDSP area could result in potential adverse impacts to a late period archaeological site. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior cultural resources impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. C-2: Adverse Impacts on P-49-3157, P-49-3159, and P-49-2796 The 2006 EIR concluded construction within the UDSP area could result in potential adverse impacts to three other known prehistoric archaeological sites. Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior cultural resources impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. C-3: Potential Adverse Impacts on Historic Structures within the University District Specific Plan Area The 2006 EIR concluded construction within the UDSP area could result in potential adverse impacts to historic resources. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR on a site that supports no existing structures. Therefore, the project would result in no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior cultural resources impacts identified in the 2006 EIR. C-4: Potential Impacts on Archaeological Sites The 2006 EIR concluded construction within the UDSP area could result in potential adverse impacts to archaeological sites within the Specific Plan but outside of the Vast Oak and UD LLC properties. Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the Vast Oak portion of the Plan area and within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior cultural resources impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. C-5: Potential Impacts on Unidentified Buried Cultural Resources The 2006 EIR concluded construction within the UDSP area could result in potential adverse impacts to unidentified burial sites. To reduce this impact to a less than significant level, the project would implement 2006 EIR Mitigation Measure C -5a, which requires Native American and archaeological monitors to be present during all ground -disturbing activities. Mitigation Measure C -5a also requires a monitoring plan to be prepared outlining procedures to be followed in the event of an archaeological discovery. With implementation of Mitigation Measure C -5a, impacts associated with unidentified buried cultural resources would be less than significant. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior cultural resources impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 Elft Mitieation Measures Mitigation Measure C -5a: Implement a Monitoring Program for Buried Cultural Resources GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEO-1: Substantial Adverse Effects Resulting from Surface Fault Rupture 13 The 2006 EIR indicated that it was very unlikely the development within the UDSP area would be impacted by surface fault rupture. All improvements associated with the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the 2006 EIR. The proposed project does not include any operational activities that would create new environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any new or substantially more severe geologic or geotechnical impacts when compared to the impacts analyzed in the 2006 EIR. GEO-2: Substantial Adverse Effects Resulting from Seismic Ground Shaking —University District Specific Plan Area The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP area could be impacted by seismic ground shaking. Mitigation Measure GEO-2a, which requires compliance with the applicable Uniform Building Code Standards, was included in the 2006 EIR to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The proposed project would comply with Mitigation Measure GEO-2a to ensure potential impacts from seismic ground shaking remain less than significant. The proposed project does not include any operational activities that would create new environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any new or substantially more severe geologic or geotechnical impacts when compared to the impacts analyzed in the 2006 EIR Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure GEO-2a: Comply with Applicable Uniform Building Code Standards GEO-3: Substantial Adverse Effects Resulting from Liquefaction The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP area would not be impacted by liquefaction. According to the 2014 Addendum, results of an updated geotechnical investigation of the Vast Oak and UD LLC areas confirmed that geotechnical conditions have not changed since the 2006 EIR was prepared. All improvements associated with the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the 2006 EIR. The proposed project does not include any operational activities that would create new environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in new or substantially more severe geologic or geotechnical impacts when compared to the impacts analyzed in the 2006 EIR. GEO-4: Substantial Adverse Effects Resulting from Landslides and Other Types of Slope Failures The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP are would not be impacted by landslides or slope failure. The UDSP area is generally level to gently sloping and, as noted in the 2006 EIR, no unstable slopes or geologic units have been identified in the project vicinity. All improvements associated with the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the 2006 EIR. The proposed project does not include any operational activities that would create new environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any new or substantially more severe geologic or geotechnical impacts when compared to the impacts analyzed in the 2006 EIR. GEO-5: Substantial Adverse Effects Resulting from Geologic Hazards—Offsite Water Tank Site The 2006 EIR concluded construction on the water tank site and installation of the potable water line could result in potential off-site geologic hazards. Development of the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would result in no changes to the water tank site. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior geologic hazards due to the water tank construction would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. 14 GEO-6: Construction -Related Soil Erosion and Sedimentation The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP area would result in less than significant erosion and sedimentation -related impacts with implementation of City requirements, including preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). All improvements associated with the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the 2006 EIR and would comply with City requirements, including preparation of a SWPPP and implementation of specific best management practices (BMPs) to control runoff, accelerated erosion, and sedimentation during construction. The proposed project does not include any operational activities that would create new environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any new or substantially more severe geologic or geotechnical impacts when compared to the impacts analyzed in the 2006 EIR. GEO-7: Substantial Adverse Effects Resulting from Ground Settlement—University District Specific Plan Area The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP could potentially be impacted by ground settlement and included Mitigation Measure GEO-7a, requiring the processing of native soils prior to construction, to ensure potential impacts associated with ground settlement remain less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-7a, the project would not be expected to create new environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any new or substantially more severe geologic or geotechnical impacts when compared to the impacts analyzed in the 2006 EIR. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation MeaSures Mitigation Measure GEO-7a: Process Native Topsoil Prior to Construction GEO-8: Substantial Adverse Effects Resulting from Expansive Soils—University District Specific Plan Area The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP area could be impacted by expansive soils and included Mitigation Measure GEO-8a requires foundation design to account for expansive soil conditions. With implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-8a, impacts associated with expansive soils at the project site would be reduced to a less than significant level, consistent with the 2006 EIR. Appiicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure GEO-8a. Design Foundations to Account for Expansive Soil Conditions HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HAZ-1: Create a Significant Hazard to the Public or the Environment through the Routine Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Materials The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP area would result in less than significant impacts related to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. All improvements associated with the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the 2006 EIR. The proposed project does not include any operational activities that would create new environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any new or substantially more severe hazardous materials when compared to the impacts analyzed in the 2006 EIR. HAZ-2: Create a Significant Hazard to the Public or the Environment through Reasonably Foreseeable Upset and Accident Conditions Involving the Release of Hazardous Materials into the Environment 15 The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP area could result in potentially significant impacts related to the reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. All improvements associated with the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the 2006 EIR. To ensure potential impacts from hazardous materials remain less than significant, the project would implement Mitigation Measures HAZ- 2a to HAZ-2e and AQ -1. Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a to HAZ-2e include requirements for the proper storage and handling of hazardous materials, handling of spills, preparing and implementing hazardous materials management plans, conducting soil sampling, and handling of soils generated by construction activities. With implementation of these measures, in conjunction with Mitigation Measure AQ -1 (refer to Impact AIR -1), the project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts related to the release of hazardous materials. This impact would be consistent with the 2006 EIR. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a: Follow City of Rohnert Park Fire Department and Other Guidelines for Storage and Handling of Hazardous Materials HAZ-2b: Immediately Contain Spills, Excavate Spill -Contaminated Soil, and Dispose of It at an Approved Facility HAZ-2c: Develop and Implement Plans to Reduce Exposure of People and the Environment to Hazardous Conditions during Construction Activities HAZ-2d: Screen Surface Soils in the Project Area for Residuals from Agricultural Chemicals (Fertilizers and Pesticides) HAZ-2e: Stockpile and Sample Excavated Soils HAZ-3: Emit Hazardous Emissions or Handle Hazardous or Acutely Hazardous Materials, Substances, or Waste within 0.25 Mile of an Existing or Proposed School The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP area could result in a potentially significant impact related to hazardous emissions. The proposed project does not include any operational activities that would create new environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any new or substantially more severe hazardous materials when compared to the impacts analyzed in the 2006 EIR. All improvements associated with the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the 2006 EIR. Consistent with the 2006 EIR, the project would be required to implement Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a to HAZ-2e (refer to Impact HAZ-2) to reduce any potential impacts associated with hazardous materials, substances, and waste to a less than significant level. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a: Follow City of Rohnert Park Fire Department and Other Guidelines for Storage and Handling of Hazardous Materials HAZ-2b: Immediately Contain Spills, Excavate Spill -Contaminated Soil, and Dispose of It at an Approved Facility HAZ-2c: Develop and Implement Plans to Reduce Exposure of People and the Environment to Hazardous Conditions during Construction Activities HAZ-2d: Screen Surface Soils in the Project Area for Residuals from Agricultural Chemicals (Fertilizers and Pesticides) 16 HAZ-2e: Stockpile and Sample Excavated Soils HAZ-4: Located on a Site Included on a List of Hazardous Materials Sites Compiled Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5 The 2006 EIR indicated that implementation of the UDSP would result in less than significant impacts related to development being located on a site included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5. The 2006 EIR concluded that there are no Federal National Priority List sites within the project area and indicated that remediation was completed on the one identified leaking underground storage tank (LUST) site within 0.5 miles of the UDSP site. No hazardous materials sites have been identified within the UDSP area since preparation of the 2006 EIR. An updated Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared for the project (ENGEO 2017), included a review of regulatory databases maintained by county, state, and federal agencies and found no documentation of hazardous materials violations or discharge on the property. The proposed project does not include any operational activities that would create new environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any new or substantially more severe hazardous materials when compared to the impacts analyzed in the EIR because all improvements would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the EIR. HAZ-5: Impair Implementation of, or Physically Interfere with an Adopted Emergency Response Plan or Emergency Evacuation Plan The 2006 EIR indicated that implementation of the UDSP would result in less than significant emergency response related impacts. All improvements associated with the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the 2006 EIR. The traffic analysis conducted for the 2014 Project, which assumed development of high density residential land uses at the project site, confirmed that no new significant emergency access impacts would result under the revised Specific Plan. Thus, the proposed project would not result in new or more significant emergency response related impacts in comparison to the 2006 EIR. HAZ-6: Expose People or Structures to a Significant Risk of Loss, Injury or Death Involving Wildland Fires The 2006 EIR indicated that it the project could result in potentially significant impacts related to exposure of people or structures to risks associated with wildland fires. The proposed project does not include any operational activities that would create new environmental impacts or new construction methods that would result in any new or substantially more severe hazards when compared to the impacts analyzed in the 2006 EIR. All improvements associated with the proposed would occur within the same development footprint evaluated in the 2006 EIR. Implementation of EIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-6a, which requires removal of dry vegetation prior to construction, and Mitigation Measure HAZ-6b, which requires spark - generating construction equipment to be equipped with spark arresters, would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-6a: Before Construction Begins, Clear Materials That Could Serve as Fire Fuel from Areas Slated for Construction Activities HAZ-6b: Require that Spark -Generating Construction Equipment be Equipped with Manufacturers' Recommended Spark Arresters NOISE 17 N-1. Exposure of Existing Residential Uses and Future Residential Uses on the Project Site from Grading and Building Construction Activities The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP area would expose existing and future residents to construction -related noise impacts. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. The Noise Study prepared for the 2014 Addendum concluded that noise levels resulting from the proposed 2014 Project, which assumed development of the proposed project, would be less than that modeled in the 2006 EIR. Mitigation N1 -a, 1-b and 1-c, which restrict hours of construction activity, require notification of nearby residences and designation of a noise disturbance coordinator, and stipulations for construction equipment to be located away from residences, would be required to be implemented by the project to ensure potential noise -related impacts remain less than significant. Accordingly, no new significant construction -related noise impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior construction noise impacts would be expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures N -1a: Restrict Hours of Construction Activity N -1b: Disseminate Essential Information to Residences and Implement a Complaint/Response Tracking Program N -1c: Locate Construction Equipment as Far Away from Residences as Feasible N-2: Exposure of Existing Residential Uses and Future Residential Uses on the Project Site from Construction -Period Groundborne Vibration The 2006 EIR indicated that development within the UDSP would expose existing and future residents to groundborne construction -related vibration impacts. This impact was previously found to be less than significant and the proposed project would not change land uses and structure types to the extent that this impact would be considered different. Accordingly, no new significant construction -related noise impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior noise impacts would be expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. N-3. Exposure of Offsite, Noise -Sensitive Land Uses to Increased Traffic Noise The 2006 EIR found that implementation of the UDSP would result in increased traffic -generated noise levels, but the increases were less than significant. The noise study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that, based on the results of the updated traffic study, noise levels resulting from the 2014 Project would be less than modeled in the 2006 EIR. The proposed project would be within the same development area and include the same level of development as assessed in the 2014 Addendum. Accordingly, no new significant traffic -generated noise impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior noise impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. N-4 Exposure of New Noise -Sensitive Land Uses to Noise The 2006 EIR found that implementation of the UDSP would result in a significant impact related to exposure of new noise -sensitive land uses to noise. The noise study prepared for the 2014 Addendum concluded that traffic noise would not increase as a result of the revisions to the Specific Plan. The proposed project would be within the same development area and include the same level of development as assessed in the 2014 Addendum. Consistent with the 2006 EIR and 2014 Addendum, the project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure N -4a to ensure that noise levels at outdoor residential areas 18 do not exceed 60 decibels (dB) day -night level (Ldn). Mitigation Measure N -4b, which requires interior noise at residences to comply with the City's interior noise goal of 45 dB Ldn, would also be implemented by the proposed project. With implementation of these measures, impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level and would be consistent with the 2006 EIR. Applicable_ 2006 EiR Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure N -4a: Ensure that Noise Levels at Residential Outdoor Activity Areas Do Not Exceed 60 dB Ldn Mitigation Measure N -4b: Apply Acoustical Insulation Treatments to Residential Units N-5: Exposure of Existing Offsite Noise -Sensitive Land Uses to Cumulative Traffic Noise The 2006 EIR found that implementation of the UDSP would result in increased significant noise impacts to off-site noise -sensitive land uses. The noise study prepared for the 2014 Addendum concluded that traffic noise would not increase as a result of the changes to the Specific Plan. Accordingly, no new significant noise impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior noise impacts would be expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. POPULATION AND HOUSING POP -1: Directly Induce Substantial Population Growth The 2006 EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the increase in population growth and concluded that the 2006 Project would not contribute to substantial population growth. The 2006 EIR determined that, with implementation of the phasing described in the Specific Plan, this impact would be less than significant. The 2014 Addendum found that the 2014 Project would reduce both housing and employment associated with the Specific Plan and corresponding population generation. The proposed project would occur within the same development footprint and would include the same development types assessed in the 2006 EIR and 2014 Addendum. No new significant impacts related to population growth or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior population -related impacts would be expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. POP -2: Indirectly Induce Substantial Population Growth The 2006 EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the increase in population growth. No new significant impacts related to population growth or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior population -related impacts would be expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. POP -3: Displace Substantial Numbers of Existing Housing The 2006 EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the displacement of substantial numbers of existing housing and concluded that the impacts would be less than significant. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. Accordingly, no new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior impacts related to displacement of housing would be expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. POP -4: Displace Substantial Numbers of People The 2006 EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the displacement of substantial numbers of people and concluded that the impacts would be less than significant. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. Accordingly, no new 19 significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior impacts related to displacement of people would be expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. POP -S: Increase Availability of Housing The 2006 EIR evaluated the beneficial impact related to the UDSP increasing the availability of housing. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would include development of a portion of the residential units planned for in the UDSP. Consistent with the conclusion reached in the 2006 EIR, the proposed project would have a beneficial impact on housing. PUBLIC SERVICES PS -1: Increased Need for Police and Fire Facilities and Service The 2006 EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the increase in population growth triggering a corresponding demand for police and fire services. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. Because the proposed project would be consistent with development assumptions included in the 2006 EIR and the 2014 Addendum, it would not be expected to generate higher levels of demand for public services. No new significant impacts related to police or fire facilities or services or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior police and fire services impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. PS -2: Increased School Enrollment Associated with Buildout of University District Specific Plan The 2006 EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the anticipated increase in student enrollment resulting from buildout of the UDSP and concluded that associated impacts would be significant. To reduce impacts to a less than significant level, the 2006 EIR included Mitigation Measure PS -2a to require payment of school fees by the developer. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. Because the proposed project would be consistent with development assumptions included in the 2006 EIR and the 2014 Addendum, no new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior school -related impacts would be expected to occur with project implementation. PS -3: Increased Demand for Recreational Facilities Resulting in Substantial Adverse Environmental Impacts or Result in Substantially Accelerated Physical Deterioration The 2006 EIR evaluated environmental impacts due to the demand for parks and recreational services resulting from buildout of the UDSP and concluded that the UDSP would provide sufficient recreational facilities such that no impacts would occur on existing facilities. The proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and the project would include development consistent with the assumptions included in the 2006 EIR and 2014 Addendum. Therefore, no new significant parks and recreation -related impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior impacts would occur with the proposed project. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 2007 plus Early Project Phase TRA -1: Increased Congestion at Sonoma State University Access upon Addition of Early Phase Project Traffic all The 2006 EIR concluded that the UDSP would increase congestion at Sonoma State University (SSU) access during the early phases of development in the Specific Plan area. Because development of the proposed project site was not included as part of the early phase of development, there would be no change in this impact or the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measure included in the 2006 EIR. TRA -2: Impede Emergency Access in Early Phase The 2006 EIR stated that "the University District Specific Plan would include an interconnected street network that would facilitate emergency access; it does not appear to include any design features that would adversely affect the maneuverability of emergency vehicles." Because development of the proposed project site was not included as part of the early phase of development, there would be no change to this impact. TRA -3: Disruption of Alternative Transportation Modes The 2006 EIR concluded that the early phases of development in the UDSP area would have a less than significant impact related to disruption of alternative transportation modes. The 2006 EIR concluded that development within the UDSP would not affect alternative transportation modes. The proposed project would not change the conclusion reached in the 2006 EIR for this impact. 2012 Plus Project Buildout TRA -4: Unacceptable Level of Service at Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the entire UDSP could have a potentially significant impact on traffic levels of services at the Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue intersection. The traffic study prepared for the changes proposed by the 2014 Project concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the 2014 Project. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the planned uses for the site in the 2014 Addendum, there would be no change to this impact conclusion. No new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would be expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -4a: Install Traffic Signal at Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection TRA -4b: Widen Keiser Avenue Westbound Approach and Snyder Lane TRA -5: Unacceptable Level of Service at Petaluma Hill Road/Keiser Avenue Intersection The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP could have a potentially significant impact on traffic levels of service at the Petaluma Hill Road/Keiser Avenue intersection. The traffic study prepared for the changes proposed by the 2014 Project concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the 2014 Project. The updated study further concluded that changes proposed by the 2014 Project would result in lower projected traffic levels from Level of Service (LOS) F to LOS C at this intersection, reducing the severity of this impact to less than significant, thereby eliminating the need for the applicable mitigation measures included in the 2006 EIR. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the planned uses for the site in the 2014 Addendum, there would be no change to this impact conclusion. TRA -6: Unacceptable Level of Service at Rohnert Park Expressway/Snyder Lane Intersection 21 The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP could result in a potentially significant impact related to levels of service at the Rohnert Park Expressway/Snyder Lane intersection. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the 2014 Project. The updated traffic study further concluded that changes in the 2014 Project would result in lower projected traffic levels, from LOS F to LOS E, at this intersection, reducing the severity of the impact but not to a level below the significance threshold. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the planned uses for the site in the 2014 Addendum, there would be no change to this impact conclusion. No new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -6a: Widen Snyder Lane between Keiser Avenue and Southwest Boulevard. TRA -6b: Reconfigure Rohnert Park Expressway/Snyder Lane Intersection TRA -7: Unacceptable Level of Service at Rohnert Park Expressway/Sonoma State University Access Intersection The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP could result in a potentially significant impact related to levels of service at the Rohnert Park Expressway/Sonoma State University access intersection. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the 2014 Project. The proposed project would be consistent with the 2014 Addendum's assumed uses for the site. Accordingly, no new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -7a: Install Traffic Signal or Roundabout at Rohnert Park Expressway/Sonoma State University Access Intersection TRA -8: Unacceptable Level of Service at Rohnert Park Expressway/Petaluma Hill Road Intersection The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP could have a potentially significant impact on levels of services at the Rohnert Park Expressway/Petaluma Hill Road intersection. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that changes to the Specific Plan would result in lower projected traffic levels from LOS D to LOS C at this intersection, reducing the severity of this impact to less than significant, thereby eliminating the need for the applicable mitigation measures included in the 2006 EIR. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the planned uses for the site in the 2014 Addendum, there would be no change to this impact conclusion. TRA -9: Increased Congestion at Adobe Road/Petaluma Hill Road in Penngrove The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would result in a significant and unavoidable impact related to increased congestion at the Adobe Road/Petaluma Hill Road intersection in Penngrove. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the 2014 Project. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the planned uses for the site in the 2014 Addendum, there would be no change to this impact conclusion. No new significant traffic impacts or a 22 substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -9a: City of Rohnert Park Coordination with Sonoma County Transportation Authority and Sonoma County TRA -10: Impede Emergency Access at 2012 Buildout The 2006 EIR stated that "the University District Specific Plan would include an interconnected street network that would facilitate emergency access; it does not appear to include any design features that would adversely affect the maneuverability of emergency vehicles." The 2014 Addendum concluded that changes to the Specific Plan associated with the 2014 Project, which included the relocation of high density residential land uses to the project site, would not change the 2006 EIR conclusion. The site plan for the proposed project would also not change this conclusion. Emergency access to the project site would be available from Kerry Road and O'Ryan Road, as well as from an emergency vehicle only entry at Keiser Avenue. No new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. TRA -11: Provision of Access Control on Rohnert Park Expressway at 2012 Scenario The 2006 EIR evaluated the potential impact to the provision of access control on Rohnert Park Expressway and concluded that approval of access plans, as described in Mitigation Measure TRA -11a, would reduce the impact to a less than significant level. It was determined that the 2014 Project's changes to the Specific Plan would not change the 2006 EIR conclusion. As noted in the 2014 Addendum, as a part of the revised Specific Plan, a signal would be installed at Rohnert Park Expressway / Twin Creeks Road and added eastbound and westbound through lanes, as well as a one-way stop, at Rohnert Park Expressway / Kohlson Place. The 2014 traffic study concluded that, with the proposed improvements, these intersections would operate at LOS C or better and 2006 EIR Mitigation Measure TRA -11a would no longer be required. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the planned uses for the site in the 2014 Addendum, the project would not change this impact conclusion. TRA -12: Disruption of Alternative Transportation Modes at 2012 Buildout The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would have a less than significant impact related to disruption of alternative transportation modes. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that buildout of the revised Specific Plan would result in lower projected traffic levels at this intersection, reducing the severity of the impact to a less than significant level. The 2014 Addendum concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the changes associated with the 2014 Project. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the assumed uses for the project site, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. 2020 Plus Project Buildout TRA -13: Unacceptable Level of Service at Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would result in unacceptable levels of service at the Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue intersection under 2020 conditions. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that buildout of the revised Specific Plan would result in lower projected traffic levels 23 at this intersection, reducing the severity of the impact to a less than significant level. The 2014 Addendum concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the changes associated with the 2014 Project. Improvements to Keiser Avenue and intersections at Keiser Avenue and Snyder Lane and Petaluma Hill Road will be constructed concurrent with project implementation. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the assumed uses for the project site, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -4a: Install Traffic Signal at Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection TRA -4b: Widen Keiser Avenue Approach and Snyder Lane TRA -14: Unacceptable Level of Service at Petaluma Hill Road/Keiser Avenue Intersection The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would have a significant impact on levels of service at the Petaluma Hill Road/Keiser Avenue intersection. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that buildout of the revised Specific Plan would result in lower projected traffic levels at this intersection, reducing the severity of the impact to a less than significant level. The 2014 Addendum concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the changes associated with the 2014 Project. Improvements to Keiser Avenue and intersections at Keiser Avenue and Snyder Lane and Petaluma Hill Road will be constructed concurrent with project implementation. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the assumed uses for the project site, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -14a: Signalize Petaluma Hill Road/Keiser Avenue Intersection TRA -15: Unacceptable Level of Service at Rohnert Park Expressway/Snyder Lane Intersection The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would have a significant impact on levels of service at the Rohnert Park Expressway/Snyder Lane intersection. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that buildout of the revised Specific Plan would result in lower projected traffic levels at this intersection, reducing the severity of the impact to a less than significant level. The 2014 Addendum concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the changes associated with the 2014 Project. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the assumed uses for the project site, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -6a: Widen Snyder Lane between Keiser Avenue and Southwest Boulevard. TRA -6b: Reconfigure Rohnert Park Expressway/Snyder Lane Intersection TRA -16: Unacceptable Level of Service at Rohnert Park Expressway/Sonoma State University Access Intersection 24 The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would have a significant impact on levels of service at the Rohnert Park Expressway/Sonoma State University access intersection. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that buildout of the revised Specific Plan would result in lower projected traffic levels at this intersection, reducing the severity of the impact to a less than significant level. The 2014 Addendum concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the changes associated with the 2014 Project. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the assumed uses for the project site, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -7a: Install Traffic Signal or Roundabout at Rohnert Park Expressway/Sonoma State University Access Intersection TRA -17: Unacceptable Level of Service at Rohnert Park Expressway/Petaluma Hill Road Intersection The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would have a significant impact on levels of service at the Rohnert Park Expressway/Petaluma Hill Road intersection. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that buildout of the revised Specific Plan would result in lower projected traffic levels at this intersection, reducing the severity of the impact to a less than significant level. The 2014 Addendum concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the changes associated with the 2014 Project. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the assumed uses for the project site, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -8a: Add Southbound Right Turn Lane and Separate Eastbound Left and Right Turn Lanes at Rohnert Park Expressway/Petaluma Hill Road Intersection TRA -18: Increased Congestion at East Cotati Avenue/Old Redwood Highway Intersection The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would have a significant impact on levels of service at the East Cotati Avenue/Old Redwood Highway intersection. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that buildout of the revised Specific Plan would result in lower projected traffic levels at this intersection, reducing the severity of the impact to a less than significant level. The 2014 Addendum concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the changes associated with the 2014 Project. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the assumed uses for the project site, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -18a: City of Rohnert Park Coordination with City of Cotati TRA -19: Increased Congestion at Adobe Road/Petaluma Hill Road and Main Street/Old Redwood Highway Intersections in Penngrove The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would have a significant impact on levels of service at the Adobe Road/Petaluma Hill Road intersection in Penngrove. The traffic study prepared for the 2014 25 Project concluded that buildout of the revised Specific Plan would result in lower projected traffic levels at this intersection, reducing the severity of the impact to a less than significant level. The 2014 Addendum concluded that this impact, and the need for and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures in the 2006 EIR, would not be changed as a result of the changes associated with the 2014 Project. Because the proposed project would be consistent with the revised Specific Plan's assumed uses for the project site, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures TRA -9a: City of Rohnert Park Coordination with Sonoma County Transportation Authority and Sonoma County TRA -20: Impede Emergency Access at 2020 Buildout The 2006 EIR stated that "the University District Specific Plan would include an interconnected street network that would facilitate emergency access; it does not appear to include any design features that would adversely affect the maneuverability of emergency vehicles." The 2014 Addendum concluded that changes to the Specific Plan associated with the 2014 Project, which included the relocation of high density residential land uses to the project site, would not change the 2006 EIR conclusion. The site plan for the proposed project would not change this conclusion. Emergency access to the site would be available from Kerry Road and O'Ryan Road, as well as from an emergency vehicle only entry at Keiser Avenue. No new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. TRA -21: Disruption of Alternative Transportation Modes at 2020 Buildout The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would have a less than significant impact related to disruption of alternative transportation modes at 2020 buildout. The 2006 EIR concluded that buildout of the UDSP would not affect alternative transportation modes. The proposed project would not affect the provision of bus service or bike transportation in the UDSP. Accordingly, no new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur as a result of the project. The project would not change the conclusion of the 2006 EIR regarding this impact. TRA -22: Unacceptable Level of Service on U.S. 101 The traffic study prepared for the 2014 Project concluded that buildout of the revised Specific Plan, which assumes development of high density residential at the project site, would result in significant impacts to U.S. 101, similar to those impacts presented in the 2006 EIR. The site plan for the proposed project would not result in changes to the conclusion of the 2006 EIR for this impact. No new significant traffic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior traffic impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS UT -1: Temporary Increase in Solid Waste Generation The 2006 EIR evaluated the temporary solid waste generation due to construction activities within the UDSP and concluded that impacts would be less than significant. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. Because the proposed project would not require higher levels of construction activity than assumed in the 2016 EIR, construction ►IN of the proposed project would not be expected generate higher levels of solid waste. No new significant solid waste -related impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. UT -2: Increase in Solid Waste Generation Associated with University District Specific Plan Implementation The 2006 EIR evaluated increases in population growth and solid waste generation associated with buildout of the UDSP and concluded that impacts would be less than significant. Because buildout of the UDSP was contemplated in the City's General Plan, solid waste generated from buildout of the UDSP falls within the projected waste stream for which the County has made provision. The 2014 Project resulted in slightly reduced levels of residential units as assumed in the 2006 EIR and reduced the size of the mixed/use commercial center. Because the revised Specific Plan would generate lower levels of development overall, including fewer residential units, the 2014 Addendum concluded that buildout under the Plan would not generate higher amounts of solid waste in comparison to the 2006 Specific Plan. Because the proposed project would include development consistent with assumptions included in the revised Specific Plan, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant solid waste -related impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior impacts would be expected to occur. UT -3: Increased Demand for Energy Associated with University District Specific Plan Implementation The 2006 EIR evaluated energy demand associated with the UDSP development and concluded that impacts would be less than significant. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. The 2014 Project resulted in slightly reduced levels of residential units as assumed in the 2006 EIR and reduced the size of the mixed/use commercial center. Because the revised Specific Plan would generate lower levels of development overall, including fewer residential units, the 2014 Addendum concluded that buildout under the Plan would not generate higher demand for energy in comparison to the 2006 Specific Plan. Because the proposed project would include development consistent with assumptions included in the revised Specific Plan, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant energy-related impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior impacts would be expected to occur. UT -4: Increased Demand for Communications Associated with University District Specific Plan Implementation The 2006 EIR evaluated the increased demand for communications due to development within the UDSP and concluded that associated impacts would be less than significant. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. The 2014 Project resulted in slightly reduced levels of residential units as assessed in the 2006 EIR and reduced the size of the mixed/use commercial center. Because the revised Specific Plan would generate lower levels of development overall, including fewer residential units, the 2014 Addendum concluded that buildout under the Plan would not generate higher demand for communications in comparison to the 2006 Specific Plan. Because the proposed project would include development consistent with assumptions included in the revised Specific Plan, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant communications -related impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior impacts would be expected to occur. UT -5: Increased Wastewater Generation Associated with University District Specific Plan Implementation The 2006 EIR evaluated increased wastewater generation due to population growth from the UDSP and concluded that impacts would be less than significant. Development of the proposed project would occur 27 within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would develop a portion of the high density residential units assumed in the 2006 Specific Plan. The 2014 Project resulted in slightly reduced levels of residential units, as assessed in the 2006 EIR, and reduced the size of the mixed/use commercial center. Because the revised Specific Plan would generate lower levels of development overall, including fewer residential units, the 2014 Addendum concluded that buildout would not generate higher levels of wastewater in comparison to the 2006 Specific Plan. Because the proposed project would include development consistent with assumptions included in the revised Specific Plan, as assessed in the 2014 Addendum, no new significant wastewater impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any prior impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. WATER RESOURCES WR -1: Change in Drainage Patterns The 2006 EIR concluded that development of the UDSP would increase runoff, potentially causing flooding on site. As stated in the Specific Plan, each property "will be required to address all of its drainage systems in order to reduce the impacts of development runoff upon the City and regional drainage system." Mitigation Measure WR -1a, which requires development projects within the UDSP to implement recommendations of storm water quality management plans and storm drainage detention analysis, was included in the 2006 EIR to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. The 2006 Specific Plan provided for a detention basin in Vast Oak West. The 2014 Project increased the size of the Vast Oak West water quality basin to assure that all hydrologic and storm drainage impacts would be fully addressed while minimizing impacts to water quality in a manner contemplated in the 2006 EIR. Development on the Vast Oak and UD LLC properties has been designed to provide for no net increase in peak stormwater discharge relative to current conditions, in accordance with the 2006 Specific Plan and EIR, and as discussed in the 2014 Addendum. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and 2014 Addendum. Accordingly, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior hydrologic impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure WR -1a: Implement Recommendations of Storm Water Quality Management Plan and Storm Drainage Detention Analysis WR -2: Water Quality Impacts from Increased Runoff Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and 2014 Addendum. As addressed in Impact WR -1 above, development within the UDSP would result in an increase of impervious surfaces and an increase in stormwater and non-stormwater runoff. The 2006 EIR concluded that implementation of Mitigation Measure WR -1a, as discussed in Impact WR -1, would help in reducing potential water quality impacts to a less than significant level. Implementation of Mitigation Measure WR -2a, which requires regular street sweeping on project roadways and other paved areas, and Mitigation Measure WR -2b, which requires implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to maximize water quality, would serve to further reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. The proposed project would be required to comply with these measures, consistent with the 2006 EIR, to ensure that water quality impacts from increased runoff remain less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure WR -1a, WR -2a, and WR -2b, the proposed project would be consistent with the 2006 EIR conclusions and would result in no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the hydrologic impacts previously identified. 28 Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures WR -1a: Implement Recommendations of Storm Water Quality Management Plan and Storm Drainage Detention Analysis WR -2a: Street Sweeping WR -2b: Best Management Practices to Maximize Storm Water Quality WR -3: Construction -Related Water Quality Effects The 2006 EIR concluded that construction activities associated with development of the UDSP would introduce the potential for increased erosion and sedimentation, which could have subsequent negative effects on water quality and storm drainage capacity. 2006 EIR Mitigation Measure WR -2b, which requires implementation of BMPs to maximize water quality, would reduce this potentially significant impact to a less than significant level. As discussed under Impact WR -2 above, the proposed project would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure WR -2b, consistent with the 2006 EIR, to ensure construction -related water quality effects remain less than significant. With implementation of this measures, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior hydrologic impacts would be expected to occur with the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures WR -2b: Best Management Practices to Maximize Storm Water Quality WR -4: Potential Contamination from Construction Vehicles and Equipment Spills Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. To address potential construction -related impacts to groundwater and surface water quality, the proposed project would be required to implement 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures WR -4a and WR -4b. Mitigation Measure WR -4a requires development projects within the UDSP to prepare and implement a spill prevention and control program to minimize the potential for, and effects from, spills of hazardous, toxic, or petroleum substances during construction activities. Mitigation Measure WR -4b requires development projects to implement measures to maintain groundwater quality in the event of an appreciable spill. With implementation of these measures, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of water quality impacts identified in the 2006 EIR would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures WR -4a: Implement a Spill Prevention and Control Program WR -4b: Implement Measures to Maintain Groundwater or Surface Water Quality WR -5: Flood Hazard The 2006 Specific Plan included a detention basin in Vast Oak West. The 2014 Project increased the size of the Vast Oak West basin to assure that all hydrologic and storm drainage impacts would be fully addressed while minimizing impacts to water quality in a manner contemplated in the 2006 EIR. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and 2014 Addendum, and would comply with 2006 EIR Mitigation Measure WR -5, which requires structures to be constructed outside of the 100 -year floodplain. No new impacts or a substantial W increase in the severity of the prior hydrologic impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. Applicable 2006 EIR Mitigation Measures WR -5a: Construct Structures Outside of the 100 -Year Floodplain WR -6: Seiche, Tsunami, or Mudflow Hazards The 2006 EIR concluded that the UDSP area was not subject to tsunami hazard to the distance from the ocean, and unlikely to be subject to seiche hazard due to the distance to any large water bodies. Since development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR, no new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of seiche or tsunami would be expected to occur under the proposed project. WR -7: Groundwater Quantity The 2006 EIR concluded that groundwater supply, together with the other water supplies available to the City, would be sufficient to meet the demands of the UDSP. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and additional groundwater impacts are not anticipated to occur. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior groundwater impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. WR -8: Insufficient Surface Water Quantity The 2006 EIR contained the UDSP Water Supply Analysis based on the City's 2005 Urban Water Management Plan. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. For the 2014 Project, the City evaluated the proposed changes to the Specific Plan, which assumed development of high density residential at the project site, against the Water Supply Assessment and concluded that sufficient water supply is available for buildout of the revised Specific Plan. Under the proposed project, the site population at buildout would be consistent with the assumptions included in the 2014 Addendum. Sources of water are not proposed to be changed. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior water supply -related impacts would be expected to occur with implementation of the proposed project. WR -9: Use of Recycled Water The 2006 EIR contained the UDSP Water Supply Analysis based on the City's 2005 Urban Water Management Plan. Development of the proposed project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR. As concluded in the 2014 Addendum, buildout under the revised Specific Plan would result in a population that would be the same or lower than the 2006 Project. For the 2014 Project, the City evaluated the proposed changes to the Specific Plan, which assumed development of high density residential at the project site, against the Water Supply Assessment and concluded that sufficient water supply is available for buildout of the revised Specific Plan. Sources of water are not proposed to be changed as a result of the proposed project. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior water supply -related impacts would occur. GROWTH -INDUCING IMPACTS The 2006 EIR evaluated growth -inducing impacts associated with the Specific Plan. The EIR considered the potential for the 2006 Project to indirectly or directly induce growth beyond that proposed in the Specific Plan document. Because the UDSP would be constructed in phases, as outlined in the Specific Plan, and it 30 would comply with growth management goals in the City's General Plan, the EIR concluded that the 2006 Project would not contribute to substantial growth inducement beyond the Specific Plan area and impacts associated with direct or indirect growth would be less than significant. The 2006 EIR also assessed whether the UDSP would result in impacts associated with the removal of a potential obstacle to growth. This impact was found to be less than significant since the UDSP was identified and planned for development in the City's General Plan and planned infrastructure improvements would not be oversized to serve additional growth beyond that described in the UDSP. Finally, the 2006 EIR looked at whether the UDSP would tax community services or facilities to an extent that new services or facilities would be necessary. Because improvements to new services and facilities would be limited to the extension and installation of infrastructure with the capacity necessary to accommodate the Plan area, and because the improvements are incorporated into the Specific Plan and were part of the 2006 Project design, the 2006 EIR concluded that this impact would be less than significant. As discussed throughout this document, the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would include development of a portion of the residences planned for in the UDSP area. Accordingly, the project would not be expected to result in new or substantially more significant growth inducing impacts than identified in the 2006 EIR. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The 2006 EIR evaluated cumulative impacts associated with the Specific Plan. The cumulative analysis in the 2006 EIR evaluated the cumulative effects on specific resources, including loss of open space, aesthetic impacts, conversion of agricultural lands, air quality, biological resources, land use impacts, noise, population -generated impacts to utilities and services, transportation and traffic, and water resources. The cumulative impact analysis evaluated the combined impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects in conjunction with the 2006 Project. The EIR cumulative project list included specific plans for the City, and development within the vicinity of the UDSP. The 2006 EIR concluded that there could potentially be cumulative impacts from the development of the 2006 UDSP Project site when combined with foreseeable development projects through the year 2020. The 2006 EIR included appropriate measures to reduce cumulative impacts, although significant unavoidable impacts related to loss of open space, conversion of agricultural lands, air quality, biological resources, land use, noise and traffic remained. The 2014 Addendum prepared for the 2014 Project, which entailed revisions to the 2006 Specific Plan, indicated that buildout under the revised Specific Plan would result in slightly reduced levels of construction of residential units and a reduction in the size of the mixed use/commercial center in comparison to the 2006 Project. In some cases, the 2014 Addendum concluded that the cumulative impacts would decrease due to the reduction in the project size and the commensurate reduction in population and associated trip generation. For example, cumulative air quality impacts would be less than the 2006 Project due to the reduction in trip generation. For all cumulative impacts, it was determined that the 2014 Project would not have any new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior cumulative impacts. 31 Because the proposed Affordable Housing project would occur within the same development footprint as assessed in the 2006 EIR and would be consistent with the anticipated land use established for the project site in the 2014 Addendum and revised Specific Plan, it would not be expected to result in any new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the prior cumulative impacts. III. Consistency Determination As demonstrated in the analysis included in Section II of this document, the proposed Affordable Housing project is consistent with the 2006 UDSP EIR. Impacts associated with the project are consistent with those previously identified and analyzed in the 2006 EIR and implementation of applicable mitigation measures, as identified throughout this consistency analysis, would ensure that all project -related impacts remain less than significant, consistent with the 2006 EIR. Impacts that were significant and unavoidable in the 2006 EIR remain significant and unavoidable and were considered prior to adoption of the UDSP. To ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of applicable EIR mitigation measures, the project would be required to adhere to the MMRP for the 2006 EIR. Conclusion; • The proposed project is consistent with the anticipated land use established for the project site in the UDSP; • The proposed project would not result in impacts on the environment that are peculiar to the project or the project site that were not identified as impacts in the 2006 EIR; • The proposed project would not result in potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts that were not identified in the 2006 EIR; • The proposed project would not result in significant impacts, which, as a result of substantial new information that was not known at the time the 2006 EIR was certified, would be more severe than were already analyzed and disclosed in the 2006 EIR; and • The project sponsor will undertake feasible mitigation measures specified in the 2006 EIR to mitigate project -related significant impacts. 32 ROHNERT PARK UNIVERSITY DISTRICT AFFORDABLE HOUSING SOUTHEAST CORNER OF KEISER AVENUE AND NORTH KERRY ROAD WITHIN VAST OAK NORTH AT UNIVERSITY DISTRICT ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA DAP SUBMITTAL PROJECT SHEET INDEX Sheet Number Sheet Name T1.1 COVER AND TITLE SHEET INDEX CIVIL Sheet Number Sheet Name C.1 OVERALL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN C.2 NATURAL RESOURCES EXHIBIT C.3 SITE PLAN CA PARKING PLAN C.5 TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION PLAN C.6 OPEN SPACE PLAN C.7 TITLE SHEET C.8 GRADING PLAN C.9 UTILITY PLAN LANDSCAPE Sheet Number Sheet Name L-1.0 COVER SHEET L-1.1 PRELIMINARY OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1.2 PRELIMINARY PLAY AREA ENLARGEMENT L-1.3 LANDSCAPE PLANS / IMAGERY L-1.4 PICNIC AREA DETAIL / IMAGERY ARCHITECTURAL Sheet Number Sheet Name A1.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A1.2 SITE DETAILS, PLANS, AND ELEVATIONS A2.1 UNIT PLANS A2.1A UNIT PLANS A2.1 B LAUNDRY AND MAINTENANCE ROOM PLANS _A2.2 A2.3 BUILDING A COLORED ELEVATIONS BUILDING B COLORED ELEVATIONS A2.3A 3D SITE PERSPECTIVES A2.4 COMMUNITY BUILDING COLOR ELEVATION A3.1 COMMUNITY BUILDING - FLOOR PLAN A3.2 COMMUNITY BUILDING - ELEVATIONS A3.4 COMMUNITY BUILDING - ROOF PLAN A4.1A BUILDING A - FIRST FLOOR PLAN A4.1 B BUILDING A - SECOND FLOOR PLAN A4.1C BUILDING A - THIRD FLOOR PLAN A4.2 BUILDING A - ELEVATIONS A4.4 BUILDING A - ROOF PLAN A5.1A BUILDING B - FIRST FLOOR PLAN A5.1 B BUILDING B - SECOND FLOOR PLAN A5.1C BUILDING B - THIRD FLOOR PLAN A5.2 BUILDING B - ELEVATIONS A5.3 BUILDING B - ROOF PLAN A6.1A BUILDING C - FIRST FLOOR PLAN A6.1 B BUILDING C - SECOND FLOOR PLAN A6.1C BUILDING C - THIRD FLOOR PLAN A6.2 BUILDING C - ELEVATIONS A6.3 BUILDING C - ROOF PLAN ELECTRICAL Sheet Number Sheet Name E1.00 SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN E1.01 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E1.02 LIGHT FIXTURES AND SCHEDULE REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 LU r I - a zw Q ° o cD oa z (DZ°IZm Za- _= O U w<.w a� _ r =.0 a Umw10C9 U +a U =c�u'�SeZ Z�X' ",F 5 U W � LL W paw0 H Q +- U > _ < �J _m V Vj � I o 0. 2, gw m H Y.1 {� T OU U w cn�a=gov Qwowc7¢¢ _ O {..L �L OOapZ Qz 4 ')awzw0 Uz Cj Lu ,9"000.0w O T Z I- H O O awpOuwz) -op C") r- Sao � O EE 2i Q Q N Q Z W U I-< o r U)0��°� � [L p?�O a E~ QO ocy)Q- z 3 ox W N T1.1 z O U rr c/) z O U oC O LL O z z w 0 U_ Q w U U) Q ° o cD oa z _= O U z a� _ r �o a z = o C/) O oQ o= z +- U > _ < �J _m oz Q 0Oz� c/)Q UO= 6C T ¢W WI - z�o� U w o3 i O - W W zLL Qz 4 Q Uz (n Lu Q Q Q O T Z I- H O O C") r- Sao � O EE 2i Q �Ocvc\j W = N Q , o Q = I-< o r YQ WLL!�C) QO ocy)Q- ox W N T1.1 z O U rr c/) z O U oC O LL O z z w 0 U_ Q w U U) U Y _ Q _ U z w z _ r ° C/) O o= �w �J _m c/)Q 6C 0 LL] 0C U \ O OC zLL U) o Q 0 C) C) U) °C O LU > z T1.1 z O U rr c/) z O U oC O LL O z z w 0 U_ Q w U U) KEISER AVE — — — — — - - — — — — — — — — — — — II II OASIS PLACE • AFFORDABLE 014K —rj-RJV Q I w HOUSING —�--�--�—� APARTMENT SITE JI I I T T 7 7 —L — L L L i F —F F_ I— Irm 1161,10mi Eel 7T. VI -1 3 r Orl-IK 1YrSr KENSINGTON PLACE KENSINGTON PLACE U KENTON PLACE — ol U 0 � KENWOOD PLACE O Y 12-14-2017 9:07am Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN\AFFORDABLE HOUSING -APARTMENT SITE\C.1 OVERALL NEIGHBORH00 PLAN.DWG • e Mr ME ME II I r-- F– – --1 I U W I w VI—IST -/ w ISI ISI I vl I I QI W I o OWEN PLACE OO I J 1 0 O I O �I of I I I o w I I I I I I Q I S I I S I I L I I °I I P�POE /cPLACE IOI IoI 01 �L J— i o OWEN PLACE o KENDAL PLACE U O Y KINCADE PLACE 0, F KINCADE PLACE U = ~z`)z�0, w - n Z w w o W ti W n KI TEP � IJ I I� I� I CE F -- z O �J�ZZw= Z(n�Q W mH W � 00UZzOm a_ _> �w Z 0 CD D w FZZ [[O 0n 1_0 KEATS PLACE KEATS PLACE Qi TWIN fif r KS FTl RK LU Ute= � U O=waZX> zw� or z , U .4_j n" ZNQW2-Zd 3 }WW 0H= O U i � 0 Z aW0O aavi U z Q C<a QQ oQo �--+ (� 0 ZKARLEIGH OZ<O7co IrDO NZ Y Q�Q W n a U z00 0� U U w O N Fa� N M 7 Y D 0 ao z LJO U CLS C/)LLi(D w c3 0 00 00 o N �- � 0 ^J L1. PLACE x Q U Y � r � Q a_ V = U Z w z cn O w Y T 1 0 KASSIDY PLACE �w �J VJ 7T. VI -1 3 r Orl-IK 1YrSr KENSINGTON PLACE KENSINGTON PLACE U KENTON PLACE — ol U 0 � KENWOOD PLACE O Y 12-14-2017 9:07am Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN\AFFORDABLE HOUSING -APARTMENT SITE\C.1 OVERALL NEIGHBORH00 PLAN.DWG • e Mr ME ME II I r-- F– – --1 I U W I w VI—IST -/ w ISI ISI I vl I I QI W I o OWEN PLACE OO I J 1 0 O I O �I of I I I o w I I I I I I Q I S I I S I I L I I °I I P�POE /cPLACE IOI IoI 01 �L J— i o OWEN PLACE o KENDAL PLACE U O Y J H z 0 U = ~z`)z�0, w - n Z w w o W ti W n KI TEP � IJ I I� I� I CE F -- z z �J�ZZw= Z(n�Q W mH W � 00UZzOm a_ KASEY PLACE z co )r O Y J H z 0 Oo v C4= ~z`)z�0, w - n Z w w o W ti W n w � IJ I I� I� I E> F -- O U) m N �J�ZZw= Z(n�Q W mH W � 00UZzOm a_ _> �w Z 0 CD D w FZZ [[O 0n 1_0 ww 0� (D ¢ Qi ZUWzwpZ=W ZEE .., LU Ute= � U O=waZX> zw� or z , U .4_j n" ZNQW2-Zd 3 }WW 0H= O U i � 0 Z aW0O aavi U z Q C<a QQ oQo �--+ (� Z OZ<O7co IrDO NZ Y Q�Q W n a U z00 0� U U w O N Fa� N M 7 Y D 0 ao z U CLS C/)LLi(D w c3 0 00 00 o N �- � 0 ^J L1. co W O x Q U Y � r � Q a_ V = U Z w z KINGWOOD ROAD x• KINGWOOD ROAD • �1 Q — • KAREN PLACELJ LJ LJ Ll LJ ' IU U 1 1 KAITL YN PLACE - • ROHNERT PARK EXPRESSWAY -----7---- — — — — — — �i � I I � II � IIiiii LEGEND: D SITE LOCATION ■■■� DAP BOUNDARY 4 0 100 200 400 SCALE: 1 "=200' REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/14/17 DRAWN BY ALK PROJECTS 19539.000 C.1 uw J H z 0 Oo v C4= ~z`)z�0, w - n Z w w o w W n O m W U[O W W w=wU 000 E> F -- O U) m N �J�ZZw= Z(n�Q W mH W � 00UZzOm a_ _> �w Z 0 CD D w FZZ [[O 0n 1_0 ww 0� (D ¢ Qi ZUWzwpZ=W ZEE .., LU Ute= � U O=waZX> zw� or z , U .4_j n" ZNQW2-Zd 3 }WW 0H= O U i � 0 Z aW0O aavi U z Q C<a QQ oQo �--+ (� Z OZ<O7co IrDO NZ Y Q�Q W n a U z00 0� C.1 0 z 0 O w O 000 cnU()�z Q ,z <� w—i O 100 co m a_ _> =�z Z 0 CD D w 0 z0 z z NoQ 0 c)¢ C.1 z 0 w 000 Q ,z <� 100 �o� =�z 0 z0 z NoQ 0 c)¢ 0 Qi LU Ute= � U zw� or z , U .4_j CD 0 ,LQ- i � aavi U z Q QQ oQo �--+ (� w(D NZ Y Q�Q z00 0� U U w O N Fa� N M 7 Y D 0 ao z U CLS C/)LLi(D w c3 0 00 00 o N �- � 0 ^J L1. co W O x Q U Y � r � Q a_ V = U Z w z cn O — T 1 0 �w �J VJ w or >O U — Z LL OC ILL} � U U Lu 0 (r p� W � a_ z D C.1 1A/1177rI A AIMC% ■ - -7 -- � •-mac+* � _..�;-► - � � — 7r 4y 77 - t , e# POO 12-14-2017 9:07am Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN\AFFORDABLE HOUSING—APARTMENT SITE\C.2 NATURAL RESROURCES EXHIBIT.DWG w mow ow o074r- - ROHNER T PARK EXPRESS WA Y sK At COPELAND CREEK 4 &I.Ia 44 oil 9 % 1 'I 149 �o 0o > U Z — V t xp=wO UH UmwxWW� I E>� d, co caV) �pzzw w <� 0)��a O¢�w - zZI-co U � vv 0 W UW Q �_ z o W c oco�zzzz O opwcnC7 W d� _ Z Z co LL ZpD[F=�C7F -0 >p LLJ _ *T Z a14i Qo cA D�WZ� Z F U2 O U am HdW OInx<J =Q C7 0 zz z_ Y 3 ZODYZ W Oz Ow cc: Lu � a_ —c o}axZ r akar . 1 O U ■ - -7 -- � •-mac+* � _..�;-► - � � — 7r 4y 77 - t , e# POO 12-14-2017 9:07am Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN\AFFORDABLE HOUSING—APARTMENT SITE\C.2 NATURAL RESROURCES EXHIBIT.DWG w mow ow o074r- - ROHNER T PARK EXPRESS WA Y sK At COPELAND CREEK 4 &I.Ia 44 oil 9 % 1 'I LEGEND: NATURAL RESOURCE LOCATIONS WITHIN UDSP LIMITS 0 100 200 400 iiiii SCALE: 1 "=200' REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/14/17 ALK PROJECT# 19539.000 �yo wHp Q gz,Jx0�w �o 0o > U Z — V t xp=wO UH UmwxWW� w E>� LEGEND: NATURAL RESOURCE LOCATIONS WITHIN UDSP LIMITS 0 100 200 400 iiiii SCALE: 1 "=200' REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/14/17 ALK PROJECT# 19539.000 �yo wHp Q gz,Jx0�w �o 0o > U Z — V xp=wO UH UmwxWW� w E>� 0"'°z co caV) �pzzw w <� 0)��a O¢�w - zZI-co U � vv 0 W UW Q �_ z o W c oco�zzzz O opwcnC7 W d� _ Z Z co LL ZpD[F=�C7F -0 >p LLJ _ *T Z a14i Qo cA D�WZ� Z F U2 O U am HdW OInx<J =Q C7 0 zz z_ Y 3 ZODYZ W Oz Ow cc: Lu � a_ o}axZ r caNo > C3}NQWtn,- zxD�D[wZ� O U �W's ¢w0o°-o0 Z R IL IrFr < =) OF - IL U C7N Z� 0 n DOZax z xxx O, �JOO LL C.2 z C L U z C c cc C LL C z LL U. L C G LL L U. z V O U Z — V w 0"'°z co O <� � W 0 � MJ W 0 cn Q Er 0 _ Z W 0� > 0F_ rr Z F_ D} L QU 0 zz z_ W 0 � cc: Lu � a_ O O Q owe H- W U z ccz O, LL o QQ i � U z c/)OQO Q �--.N U) W Co z Y Q F 0 0 z U)0 N Y�0 U u1=c2,c? F ­Q 0 CO C/)O < cl) F 0-1 << _ U U)w(D 00 o E5 Cz w (0 000 0 2 O 0- 4W2 J C.2 z C L U z C c cc C LL C z LL U. L C G LL L U. Q U V Y H- 0 U Z — Lu z z o Ir co O � W � MJ W cn Q Er 0 W 0� > 0F_ U Z F_ D} L QU W 0 � cc: Lu � a_ z D C.2 z C L U z C c cc C LL C z LL U. L C G LL L U. 12-14-2017 9:06am Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN\AFFORDABLE HOUSING—APARTMENT SITE\C.3—SITE PLAN.DWG F__ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _F - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — -- — -- KEISER AVENUE - ----------------------- L ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 —71 c C r c c I c I c I c I c I c I c I c K c c c c _96 9- g' c I c I c I c Ii-,- I -( 3 VAIST ol-14K NORTY 12-14-2017 9:29am Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN\AFFORDABLE HOUSING -APARTMENT SITE\C.4_PARKING PLAN.DWG c I c c, c cl CI CA c1 ccII c, c' cl C A c c c, c C 1 CA CI 1 c, C' CI C Cl C� c I 1 C' CI C 1 A C 1 C� c 1 I C' CA C' 1 __9A PARKING SUMMARY: PARKING REQUIRED PER CITY OF ROHNERT PARK 27 - 1 BEDROOM UNITS: 27 SPACES 141- 2 BEDROOM UNITS: 282 SPACES 50 - 3 BEDROOM UNITS: 125 SPACES GUEST PARKING(24$): 55 SPACES TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 489 TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED WITH 10% TRANSIT REDUCTION PER 17.16.040(B) OF ROHNERT PARK CITY CODE: 441 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED ONSITE PARKING: STANDARD SPACES: 326 COMPACT SPACES: 93 ACCESSIBLE SPACES: 24 TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 443 ADDITIONAL ON STREET PARKING PROVIDED: PARALLEL SPACES: 30 LEGEND: 0 PARKING STALL C COMPACT STALL Per Californio Building Code Chopter 11 B - Division 5 12' (Van) \5' g' �z�zC7�w WZFOL C N W = - W U� U�pJ�pWp O EOa>?LUi N NOWW C,0: Z ~cUnZZW2W P RKIN 'a I-- TYPICAL DOUBLE DISABLED PARKING STALLS 4 0 30 60 SCALE: 1 "=30' REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/14/17 DRAWN BY ALK PRO' ECT # 19539.000 r/ N, WO J F-:�o �z�zC7�w WZFOL �J N W = - W U� U�pJ�pWp O EOa>?LUi a NOWW C,0: Z ~cUnZZW2W mo 'a I-- W Er OUWOzU) m Q z U DO- E E W W � w O w ZUZZZZ w U_ ZmF =� �a } Z�O��2�1_ OU am <��J -Z -0 Ww�z2 =a c7 W�z C7n¢Lu- } O O uip s Z>tDWZF Q F_ U �W ZLL WOO �d¢¢=)(7~ � Z;E O =�7aHJ0 W u0 I- d CD Z_ Z J Q Q) Uz �J N }� O � W iui MJM W Q Q W Er U)W Q z w� �QU �w w O w UJ O N M a. <ao� U_ =� F-- — (� W �r o WJ�N (j m .. ^� I.. L * W 2 C.4 z O 0 W 0 0= Z 0 �o� = z 0 o°z Q oc)a 0W� Q a Mz? O. LL J 0 << Uwe az Q Q OQo ��Q azo O= QQo aQ F Z) O J Q U Y Ir Q w H Ir W z O Ir z c L U z c L 01 F- c U LL EE H 0c z w D LL V Q C G LL L V Uz �J — _ � W � MJM W Q W Er Q z LL� �QU w O w a. C.4 z O 0 W 0 0= Z 0 �o� = z 0 o°z Q oc)a 0W� Q a Mz? O. LL J 0 << Uwe az Q Q OQo ��Q azo O= QQo aQ F Z) O J Q U Y Ir Q w H Ir W z O Ir z c L U z c L 01 F- c U LL EE H 0c z w D LL V Q C G LL L V �------,F__ KEISER AVENUE --- - ------------------------------- --- ------------------------------------------ -------------------------- L ----------------------- 10 C c c c c c CI CI CI I I I CI CI CI C �J& � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 61� ____---__ _________— El 12-14-2017 9:29am Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN\AFFORDABLE HOUSING -APARTMENT SITE\C.5_TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION PLAN.DWG 0 9 R"YAN ROAD I ------------ VI-1-1k07 0AIK JVO)VTH 0 0 1 n cccc go 00 00 to 0 LEGEND: ❑ TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION NOTE: REFER TO LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURE PLANS FOR ENCLOSURE AND SCREENING DETAILS 4 0 30 60 NEEM SCALE: 1 "=30' 00, - — – – – – – o � o � O - WZFW = c� ,w ____---__ _________— El 12-14-2017 9:29am Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN\AFFORDABLE HOUSING -APARTMENT SITE\C.5_TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION PLAN.DWG 0 9 R"YAN ROAD I ------------ VI-1-1k07 0AIK JVO)VTH 0 0 1 n cccc go 00 00 to 0 LEGEND: ❑ TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION NOTE: REFER TO LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURE PLANS FOR ENCLOSURE AND SCREENING DETAILS 4 0 30 60 NEEM SCALE: 1 "=30' 00, - — – – – – – –––––––––––– – – – – –– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –– – – –– – – – – —--- - WZFW = c� ,w 2 REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/14/17 DRAWN BY ALK PROJECT# 19539.000 NMI.i c/)r/N, WO J F-:�o �z�z��w z 0 ° - WZFW = c� ,w 2 W n =-0 - W p U U m W 2 W W 00c� E> �JZZZ W= W Oaim O Z(n0W mH 0 O J Z_ Z O m U t— U U 2<S28882 W W U� � o p Op 2 Z Z Z Z d Z 0 zQa[���v� mF �a U } .w us, OU am F�w���J =a � Q zO�zW�Z W 2} d L. Z > +� U aWzx=z C7}NQWHO � O } uip Ws Z>tw<WZF QWOO� U i ZLL �dQQ�C7~ Q Q � U>� QzQ Q U) �O c') OQO U) W uo I- d � N z Y � � Q Qzo NMI.i z 0 NW I..L c� ,w 2 ZD 0 00c� Z Q O 0 U= t— C)Ow _ Z Z J �o 00(D W Qzz NMI.i z 0 c� ,w 00c� Z 0 _ Z �o 00(D Qzz o�a LU Q o +� U zw� Mz, } O 0QLL _ J > i � � Q Q � U>� QzQ Q U) OQO U) Lu N z Y � � Q Qzo N w� U Cn00N LLI =0 N I—<0 Y M U) 0 JzU) F— a g U(.00 (� U) LLi "'c�� oco o Q o d.WN x J Q U Y = U z w z _ o Ir c� 0 — _ W � J � m ��— VJ Q Er n W rr > 0F_ U Z DQ r NMI.i z C L U, z C L 01 C LL C z LL U, c Q C G LL L U, 12-14-2017 9:06am Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN\AFFORDABLE HOUSING—APARTMENT SITE\C.6_0PEN SPACE PLAN.DWG 12-14-2017 1:43pm Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\APARTMENT BASE\GP\P—GP-7—TITLE.DWG x 134.5 1.34.6 131 9 132.4 133.7 136.5 137.6 x 1 x x x x x x ISER AVENUE 134.5 x __ _ Lo - 132.9 w 133.5 o N 133.9 0 6 134.9 1.35 x 135.6 �' � o- x 136.7 37.4 0 x 138.5 x x 140_ r �._... _...- x r + r + r 2 r O - X o` c� T �w cD 205+0 206+00 �n 207+00 - -' ---__--------_---- --- - ,) --- 202+00� -_-- -203+0 rn -- ------ 4+ -- ---- --_ --_-------_---- - -_---------- - ------------------ ------------ -- --- - ----� -------ZO�OO ��� L'_ s� r -N 1= N.. O CT 200 + o c� ' CD O r N H O Cl) N H N '- N H '( X O U N H X N ~ X 139.3 x X X x 131.7 ---------------------- - -- -------------------------- ------ -- 13.8 x -- -- -I 7 5.5 -----x -------------------� x FG 136.9 FG 137.5+ I 136.4 136. I 30.7 I ❑ ° ° I 1 6.3 ❑ 3 30.6 I x I I =_ ° 1 2 = 1135. ❑ 2 13 XO __ 1 ` 6 I =_ ° x ° x =_ - x x i x 1 -.� I 1 1 1 1 6.51 11 .4 ti J 2 � i 3 x 139 °,° ` I , _ - W 134.9 � - l 3 0 � \ P D = 135.0± :::--:: ,y = 1 + 1-130. PAD = 133.8± -=- �� ' ���� - I - ■ \\�\,` FF = 134.8± \\\\ FF 136.0± FF - 138.1± ,'' loo `'� +FG 134.7\--------'��- x 4+FG 135.1 FG 135.8+ \---------14-,8--- +F 13 .3 +FG 136.1 FG 1 7 +FG 137.6 --------------- +FG .138.7 N C C C C xC C C C x C8 +FG 136.5 FG 136.9+• 1 C C V x 13 .9 x I I 0 [��I l x x 38.7 130.1 1 70.j x � 1 4.8 &d& / - 66x 6 x x 134.6 _ 6- Ko 1 6.1 + 1 5.1 134.8 °a� r °�° x �,° j FG 134.7 - 134.8 1.2% - G 18.5 l C x 0 x r x x 134 �_ 134.5 ♦ 136.2 135.9 T X x to x C 134.9 1 4. x 1 6.5 F1 ! C IJ4.9 1 5. x x 34. C .t, +FG 133.9 F 1 6.7+ 137. + d� C.,-----------------F� ------------ 3 1 0.6 C FG _134.9+ -F 134.9+ LI', _ �Iw�lw x \ j 1 2 x 13 +FG 134.5 FG 135.0+ ;+F 135.0 FG 135.,7+ � \ lox C 13 . / x G 13 .0+ x FG 1 8. + \ \ ❑ I ��� ---=---------------------- - 136.5 °\° 139. :: +F1 _5.5 N F 134.6 � •..- -134. ------::_, - FG 135.5+ x x M 6 I 1 I I C( ID � II I _ = ° ° PAD = 133. ± 34 °113 . PAD = 137.0± - 1 136.1 139.0 A F F= 134.9± x I I 5 �� ❑ _ T 1 �. I FF 138 0±; 1 9.6 - x x I '-x34.9 � II FG -1-34 . + _ � -. , ! � � + I- ----- - ----- \-FFG 138.)+- x 38 0+ � 1 F 134.9+ -------------- ----- 134.x'\.FG 135.5+ � PAD = 134.5- _ +- / FG 138. ++0- - ----- 13 129.2 a FG 134.5+ ' \ \ ` x FF = 135.5± 5.1 FG X35 ._5 x x FG 137.3+ x 1111 +FG 134.2 +\--FG 134.0+ FG 1 4.0 x _----��--------- FG 136.7+ ,+ FG 137.5 X TT�5. G 138 2 x + FG 137 2+ C 0 _ x x C 138.7 C x1 I x +F 134.10 9 �::: 35.9 C x 135.1 135.1 A"�V _ 136.2 c OOMMUNITY BLDG = - x FG 136.2+:::l�:: ° x 1 0. o x G 134 .-0+ .�., 7�`5 x x 35.7 FG61 .7+ 136. + FG , 13e$. + °rn 1 . % °� d: C x _�� I J .a _= o r c x 34........�r; C 129. c ' PAD m - 133.2± +F 134 . o ' 0'i .■'w:: x c FF = 134.2± ^� 135.8 ll--� A004 rui./ I �v FG 136.7+ '� 0 F 136.4 + C _ I I x 1 G 134.0+ 134.7 ___________ +FG 137.7 FG 136.5+ G c - r x G 135.5+ x 1 1 1 1 FG 133.8+ IF 'x \ 1 X9.8 13 . 1- 138.3 > 4+51 .14 \ \ FG 136 3+ TC 1 1 4 C 133.4+ ----------------FG 133.4+ ------I I 34 ° _FG 137. + -- -----------�G 137. +.- - I - - 1 _ I A A C x 129.1 I ❑ ❑ I I I I ❑ o °\° I == 3 x C T I 7 I I ° PAD = 134.5± ° 1 .�.2 j c i I .9 ai . FF = 135_ . 5+ i i = _ c I = ° PAD = 132.4± = I I + x 3 I ���� \ 136.1 �, C ` _ ---F 1 --------------- ---- +FG 135.5-- ` PAD = 136.0± , 37.6 FF 133 4± -FG 137 0+ NIL +FG 137.0- 5+161.14 134.8 i +FG 134 7 +FG 135 0 x FG 135 9+ FF = 137.0± '' °o x :TC 1 1.54 �------�------------------- -- - 'I . ' - - - - - - - - - - - x I C FG 133.4+ G 133.4+ F��� 1 .8 FG 134.9 ���� \ r Y'y y, C 134.8 +FG 13 .2 I x � , �. FG 133.5+ +FG 1133.7 34. l C Vii° x x 134. x APPROXIMATE LI IT (TYP. FG 136.0+ ! ,� � �xl 4. 6 . 4 137.2 129.6 C I C \° � °\° °\° 13 135.2 x 134.9 � C x x o o x 1 .0% x 135.4 °� FG 3, X+ +FG 131.4 r r r T I 34.7 � � 13 137.2 15+8 .39 ER 1 4. x 13 .7 x 129.2 . T 1 1.2 x 1 4. x I x 35.1 1 6. x TC 4 +F 1 1.2 + 34.8 +FG 133.8 FG 134.1+ +F 134.2 134. 1 5 x FG 135.0+ + x + j G 3 F 132.0 FG 135.1 FG 135.3 F� CD x j f: I - - 114 7 r j 134.4 CD x . M N 1 00 w 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 °� r L r o �� • N 6+00 N 7+00 00 134.9 w N w � ' 1 4. `� �, x 133.3 x � x134.3 x 30. l ,� + + 134.8 c co 134.4 - °, Ox YA 1 �I ROA 132.4 `° 135.3 ■ N r x M O Co.~ � OTFS: jl x x 134'7 133.4 1 ALL FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWN „'34.8 '�/l 7 i! ARE PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS AND SUBJECT TO FINAL DESIGN. 12-14-2017 1:42pm Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\APARTMENT BASE\GP\P-GP-8-APARTMENTS.DWG -N- 0 30 60 Moog SCALE: 1 "=30' REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/14/17 DRAWN BY JG PROJECT# 19539.000 �z N rn �o W J H 0uz z 0 Q �zC7'LLw � W n 2.6 H W o, 2 U U m w 2 w w C) E> Q w �J�ZZw2 W Oaim Oor 0 rn H�UZZHCCI U E-OpaoDO w W Ud�s ♦Y o p�ZZZwzZ z�zQSU) mw z K} D W Z V 2 N am Owl v LU +r Z Oa. Z W Z 0 cc (L U [L C7>-N¢WO ao- 92 uip W Y ZL��WZF Q O O O U iLLj w QQ U>� <Z< Q Z� �O =�7aHJ0 z< U) W� �IL N z Y � � Q Qzo �z z 0 Q Z � Z_ J C) W Q C) z 0 0 Lu °o(D C) 0 _ Z 0 o°(D Q�= oc)a N Owl v LU +r U zw� Mz, LLQ- iLLj QQ U>� <Z< Q U) z< U) Lu N z Y � � Q Qzo N w� N U U)00 LLI =0 N I-Qo� M U) 0 Jz`n woo o 'o�- 0^cz L.L a O X d W N J Q U Y C z U Z w z - - c/) O ac C/) 0 W W - Q _ 2 U) W (D J Z - m C/) Q Q W Er C�> 0 F- C) Z LL o Fn x \ KEISER AVENUEx 134.5 --------------------------------- T------ ----------------- -------------------------- ------------- -- -- - ---------- ----- - - --- ---- ---- - 132.9 133.5 133.9 134.6 134.9135 - x 135.6 x 136.7 X 37.4 x x - X - �< �E X __--- 205+00 206+00 - - 207+00 - _ _ ----_----- ---___ 200 201+00 - 202+00 203+07 4+ _ -- ----- - -- ---_-------_---- - -_----------------------------------- ------------ ------ --- = ------ -- x x x x 139.3 X x x x X Ilkx 131.7 115.5 135.7 .8 x 1 7 4 135.1 -I > X xj 3d . 7 ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ 1 ❑ 136. 1 6.3 ❑ 3 130.6 ❑ 135.1 ❑ 135.0 � ❑ x ❑ x 1 xx x ' 1111 6.5 1 2 x 1 ■ 1 ■ s ., L O ■ _ ■ i N 7ii ❑ 134.9 1130 � � , _ 3 4 CD h x 1 x x134.8 > N C C C C C xC C C C C Ci 4C8 B A.1 C C C C x 13.9 x I 1 .1 1 x x 38.7 Lo 130.1 7nX 114. 8 i1Nu13 134.6 x x 129.6 x 1+ I � '� sSM - - 2+00 1 - - s�°° �°° �- s " Ss - INS 5+00 �- - SSM - - - 6+• 0 _ _ _ 8 SS _ 7+00 - t SSM ow+00 - X - 1 6. � C ... ... ... ... � ... 134-8- ... �3. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ..� ... ... 0.. ... ... ... 3• ... ... � ... C x _ �... 611W x 611W x INS x 134.50 ® 136.2 611W it 9.7 C 13 . h NEW INS t x 001 G x 1 4. 1 .5 1 I C = J4.9 c 30 60 ;I I C B X 12."SD x 12"SD MH 12 SD B 12"SD c ' > 3 1 0.6 C 2„So �i�i N ���� x o B IO (11 1. C 17 x 134 8 1 4 X r) d I o x k"A s X 9. 1 CD 134. - - - x x T , - X 4.8 � EC E ( 12" ° ° 134.7 135.7 c 1 36.1 !t7.. : E I FY � ❑ x ❑ ❑ ❑ 34 9 x❑ 5 x ° 136. f 13� •1 �• x x ; x u 1 I x 134.9 j 1 x x x x 129.2 a cn r . o 0 134. 1 .8 `° s ' II X .M `" �,� ° 135. 1 5. C CX x xX C 138 C - 9 = _ 35.9 o C X 135.1 135.1 COMMUNITY BLDG �S 136.2 x 2 C x - ......" 135.1 x,........ x °' IJ6_2 CD C o w .� - - O 34' .....■..r; 129. C gg$ x ■ x C ' �T. 1. 4.7 90#C - 1 134.7 13 k C I x 4.8 .1 x 12"s 1 i B x ■ 12P. 8 B ,.. 13 . � � ' 12 SD 138.3 x C I STORM DRAIN TO BE EXTENDED X 1 5.4 cl ❑ :::; ::: C WITH FINAL DESIGN OF PASEO 34. - C I x -.,y. ■ 8 136. 129.1 � ° cy\❑ ❑ Ix � = 34 � ,11 x T C I 7 ❑ ° ° ❑ 1 5.2�L 1 ICD CX o C I j o ❑ x 1 6.1 + 1 !I , ° 135.9 C 'Y x I 37.6 CD 1 J. 3G�. 134. x N x T `y. t �i' i ?8.6 1cn 8 1 4. 34. j co x 134. X134. & & x x 4 137.2 2�. 6 CL --- - --- - --- - --- 6• W. C x .. ... �. _... ... 13 ...5., x 134.9 ... �.. 6, W... C x 1+ x 2+00 3+00 1+0G 5+00 6XOO 7+00 .4 � 8+00 9 00 ' C S MH _ _ � 81119s-- - - - - - SSMH - - - - 61 SS � - SSMH C I CO E EXI 18" 34.7 � X13 IN 25.b (+IFY) I 13 .7 x x II '� X X129.2 j sa X1 4. 4 x1 4. x 134. 1 5. 35.1 x x1 6. 3 .8 B 12 SD B 12 SD B B 0Vo 12 SD 2"SD x i C CST T E. 8 CD CD I 111,24 1 (VIERI Y) +134.6 136.6 f +00 _C 2+00 3+00 i 4+00 5+00 0 6+00 7+00 00 3 134.9 'RYAN �133.3 X 134.3 X 134.4 G ROAD 1 4 135.3 X I I X 0 X - 134.7 x 133.4 ------=-- 134.8 �------E-- ► � 1.34 7 } 1 x 134.7 I 32.5 NOTES: 1. PASEO DRAINAGE TO BE DETERMINED DURING FINAL DESIGN. 2. SERVICE -LINES TO EACH BUILDING TO BE DETERMINED DURING FINAL DESIGN. 12-14-2017 1:43pm Amanda Karchefski P:\19539\PLANNING\APARTMENT BASE\GP\P-GP-9-APARTMENTS.DWG REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/14/17 DRAWN BY JG PROJECT# 19539.000 �yo �o w ":11= �Zp �Z��W a� J z W x��wooU S op ILfr I- E ��R �U0 w 00pw� < ~ W 0z Oya W 0¢0} U Q U QC7UppFm dUUpw LLw UD[ �'UziN c "0'0 Z Z Z z d F ZN 7=0 `2c }Fw- ZQm o� ©_ m r a W 0 a J 2 C7¢ �alz0lwpwuz2EZCo- D CL fAp C7}n-2i¢w�z0 ZOCWOCW ZF 0 U �W ¢wO(��� �p¢JOOVJ C7U- Z� JO W Ln H d � Z a� J z I- J Lu J ryD z 0 0 Lu 0 Ir0 = z .00 <o� _ Z �o 0zzz o°Q pw� zw< U oz , U LLQ_ CD QQc? i � U z a � OQO .�, NZY W(0Q Q U7,00 0Z U NY Z w0Nc•) c U �< Qz� 1¢-0r� ag U �w�o � cU W N o LL O¢ O X J d LU N Q U Y V Q U w z z z rlr F � � z o U)0 0 0 = U Q w D J F_ 00 c/) J C/)a z cr p U LLQ rr oC >p L) 0 U LL z �F_ LL 0 D z a w F - z w U) U F_ cog a w U LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR: 1st LAND DEVELOPMENT PHASE - VAST OAK NORTH AT UNIVERSITY DISTRICT ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA DECEMBER 14, 2017 VICINITY MAP SITE MAP TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT KEISER AVENUE _„ AFFORDABLE HOUSING AREA COVER SHEET L-1.0 -, SITE 1P, o >'' PRELIMINARY OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1.1 T� it y "KEIS 'r s PRELIMINARY PLAY AREA ENLARGEMENT L-1.2 - J P', r. F -t, LANDSCAPE DETAILS / IMAGERY L-1.3 CITY HALL DR w , f+,�_ ROHNERT PARK FXp VAST OAKS W -- O'R AD RFss Z PROPERTIES PICNIC AREA DETAIL/ IMAGERY L-1.4 bVq y J UJ UD LLC GREEN ENTERPRISE DR PROPERTY Music z CENTER N SONOMA STATE TANK SITED — UNIVERSITY E. COTATI AVE CHESTER DR CURTIS DR m 101 � MAGNOLIA WAY ROBERTS RD y�GSF ALAN DR c 0�0 O 000 � W EUCALYPTUS AVE Y NTS PACIFIC Vast Oak North at University District vanderToolen • Associates www.vanderToolen.com WEST Development Napa Walnut Creek West Sacramento ARCHITECTURE VAST OAK NORTH AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS 430 East State Street, Suite 100 Cover Sheet , �, 855 Napa,5 A 700lnut Creek, k, CA W. stone Blvd. L�l Area Plan �������� _ -� 0 Way, Suite 240 Rd. Suite 100 Suite 115 � Eagle, ID 83616 iNapa, CA Walnut Creek, CA W. Sacramento, 94596 CA 95691 208.908.4879 R o h n e rt Park, California LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS fax: 707.224..224.6821 707 z99 tel: 925.274.131)5 tel: 9,6.244.3000 Scale: Not Applicable DECEMBER 14, 2017 Project No. 05217 fax Copyright 2017 vanderToolen Associates. The drawings or written materials contained herein constitute the original and unpublished work of the landscape architect. Reproduction, use or alteration in any form is strictly prohibited without the written consent of vanderToolen Associates. Ah mr PLAY AREA 1 AND PICNIC AREA Scale: 1 "=20'-0" uzver J./ Heel comm• an rrew PLAY STRUCTURE IMAGERY x x J x e PLAY AREA 2 AND PICNIC AREA Scale: I"=20' -O" PLAY STRUCTURE DETAIL PLAY STRUCTURE DETAIL Scale: N.T.S. Scale: N.T.S. Vast Oak North at University District vandeffoolen•Associates 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' WEST Development Preliminar Pla Area www..e"d.eT""le "m L-1 .2 /� VAST OAK NORTH AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS " w�.�"'w�' ARCHITECTURE fl , w,y.sww=ao 10°�"`""° ='al sls re&i" "•v.. cn w.m�i o.i,�cn w. sss,.nemu 430 East State Street, Suite 100 Area Plan Enlargement - 99s,9 94596 G95691 Eagle, ID 83616 zoasos.aszs Rohnert Park, California LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS "=o,==^==99 h,9==,.1�=�9'fi=<==� Scale: 1"=20'-0" DECEMBER 14, 2017 NORTH Project No. 05217 LaJW=L.69=1 Copyright 2017 vanderToolen Associates. The drawings or written materials contained herein constitute the original and unpublished work of the landscape architect. Reproduction, use or alteration in any form is strictly prohibited without the written consent of vanderToolen Associates. a e PLAY AREA 2 AND PICNIC AREA Scale: I"=20' -O" PLAY STRUCTURE DETAIL PLAY STRUCTURE DETAIL Scale: N.T.S. Scale: N.T.S. Vast Oak North at University District vandeffoolen•Associates 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' WEST Development Preliminar Pla Area www..e"d.eT""le "m L-1 .2 /� VAST OAK NORTH AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS " w�.�"'w�' ARCHITECTURE fl , w,y.sww=ao 10°�"`""° ='al sls re&i" "•v.. cn w.m�i o.i,�cn w. sss,.nemu 430 East State Street, Suite 100 Area Plan Enlargement - 99s,9 94596 G95691 Eagle, ID 83616 zoasos.aszs Rohnert Park, California LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS "=o,==^==99 h,9==,.1�=�9'fi=<==� Scale: 1"=20'-0" DECEMBER 14, 2017 NORTH Project No. 05217 LaJW=L.69=1 Copyright 2017 vanderToolen Associates. The drawings or written materials contained herein constitute the original and unpublished work of the landscape architect. Reproduction, use or alteration in any form is strictly prohibited without the written consent of vanderToolen Associates. O CONCRETE PAVING. O REINFORCING PER SOIL'S REPORT RECOMMENDATION. O 1/2" TOOLED RADIUS. O CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE, COMPACTION, & THICKNESS PER SOIL'S REPORT RECOMMENDATION. (� COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR ENGINEERED FILL. O6 1/4" WIDE X 3/4" DEEP TOOLED CONTROL JOINT (SEE PLANS). O7 3/8" WIDE FIBER FILLED EXPANSION JOINT W/ POLYSULFIDE SEALANT. SEALANT COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVING. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION. O8 FINISH GRADE. 2 BELOW TOP OF PAVING FOR PLANTING AREA. �9 THICKENED EDGE AT PLANTING AREA WHERE REQUIRED OR UNDER PEDESTALS. O1 TREE. �4 TREE ROOTBALL 2" DIAMETER LODGE POLE SET ON LIGHTLY PINE STAKE SET 30" INTO TAMPED SOIL. DO GRADE OR UNDISTURBED NOT PENETRATE SUBGRADE A MINIMUM OF ROOTBALL WITH 12" BELOW BOTTOM OF STAKES. ROOTBALL. PLACE STAKES O 3" DEEP WATERING PARALLEL TO PREVAILING BASIN. WINDS. © FINISH GRADE. 3 RECYCLED RUBBER TWIST O AMENDED BACKFILL. TIES KNOT AND ATTACH TO STAKE W/ ROOFING TACK. (4) 21 GRAM PLANT TABLETS - SEE 5 GENERAL PLANTING 2NOTES, SHEET L-1. NOTE: -SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANTING AILING WIND � PIT. _ �/ -FERLTILIZED TABS ARE NOT TO BE USED WITH CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANTS. TWICE ROOTBALL -DO NOT USE AMENDED SOIL DIAMETER RUBBER TWIST TIES PLAN FOR CALIFORNIA NATIVE ELEVATION WRAPPED IN A FIGURE TREES. "8" AROUND TRUNK SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1" CONCRETE PAVING n TREE STAKING ABOVE GRADE. SCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'-0" (B N.T.S. PLANT SPACING SCHEDULE: A = TRIANGULAR SPACING B= ROW SPACING* C=PERIMETER SET -BACK 611 5tt+ 4" 12" 10 1/2"± 10" 18" 16"± 12" 24" 21 "± 18" 36" 31 "± 24" * 0.866 X A PLANTING GRID: Z�%� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + B + + + + + + + + + + C + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +� + + + + + + + + + + I + + 4 4 4 + + + + + + + + + +�� O 1 GROUND COVER SPACING CHART L -J% N.T.S. LAURUS N. 'SARATOGA' TREE IMAGERY TWICE ROOTBALL DIAMETER SHRUB N.T.S. SHRUB - SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. O2 3" HIGH WATERING BASIN. 03 FINISH GRADE. O4 AMENDED BACKFILL. O5 SET ROOTBALL ON LIGHTLY TAMPED SUPPORT. O6 (2) 21 GRAM PLANT TABLETS. 3" DEPTH MULCH. COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR ENGINEERED FILL. NOTE: 1. FERTILIZER TABS ARE NOT TO BE USED WITH CALIFORNIA NATIVE SHRUBS. 2. DO NOT USE AMENDED SOIL FOR CALIFORNIA NATIVE SHRUBS. 1 PERMEABLE PAVING AT too' E.V.A. ON KEISE�RAVE. CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS LAGERSTROEMIA 'MUSKOGEE' LAG ERSTROEMIA 'TUSCARORA' PISTACIA CHINENSIS PYRUS CALLERYANA 'CHANTICLEER' QUERCUS RUBRA PACIFIC Vast Oak North at University District vanderToolen• Associates www.vanderTooIen.com 1NESTCTURE Development Landscape Details/ � — �Valley VAST OAK NORTH A P P O R D A B L E APARTMENTS , N558 Walnut Creek West Sacramento 430 East State Street, Suite 100 � �� sss app, A Wal nadCW. stone nto, Area Plan Imagery ������� � �/ Way, N��� �A Walnut Creek, d. lte ,CA W sa� ��mento Eagle, ID 83616 yfLll��ti 94596 9569, 208.908.4879 R o h n e rt Park, California LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS tel: 707.224.2299 tel: 925.274.1305 ted: 916.244.3000 fax: 707.224.6821 Scale: As Noted DECEMBER 14, 2017 Project No. 05217 Copyright 2017 vanderToolen Associates. The drawings or written materials contained herein constitute the original and unpublished work of the landscape architect. Reproduction, use or alteration in any form is strictly prohibited without the written consent of vanderToolen Associates. N T co T NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ARCHITECT WITH PERGOLA SHOP DRAWINGS PRIOR TO PERMITTING DESIGN - BUILD COMPONENTS 0 T N NOTE: AT 32 UNIT SITE THERE IS NO PICNIC TABLE OR PERGOLA - ONLY AT 66 UNIT SITE 0'-7 1/2" PICNIC AREA DETAIL 1 1 \J 1 V 1 V 1" LJ L_ L- \ 1 1 1 °/ %.J L_ L_ LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR SIZE AND SPECS DECORATIVE METAL OUTRIGGER, TYP. 30'-011 1'-611 co T 1 4" CONC. SLAB ON ROAD MIX ON GRADE SLOPE TO EDGE PROVIDE TURN DOWN CONT. FOOTINGS A.D.A. BBQ FIXTURE, PROVIDE ACCESS & CLEARNACE AS SHOWN TS POST BY PERGOLA MANUFACTURER SET IN REINFORCED CONC. FOOTING PER PLAN. DECORATIVE BEAM AND GIRDERS W/ 1"x1" PERP. PERGOLA SHADE SLATS Scale: N.T.S. i s 1 ,1 �,�. '.1� a _STT --�— _ _ _'� r ��^S� mom• ¢ :Til r' 7.7 _ 1 _ —___ — —� —� 1 �-e �r+°i_,., -'i; r �C°" .-+'•".ice � h, . Wiz_ � _ y . k _" air `�^. � -� • ..� _ r -slt,-. .Cd 7 ��rr vr's kr 1114 F' r�- PICNIC AREA IMAGERY r RA 0 PACIFIC Vast Oak North at University District vanderToolen• Associates www.vanderTooIe n.com WEST • Napa Walnut Greek West Sacramento ARCHITECTURE Development Picnic Area DetaII/ �55BodeaY °Stone Way, Suite 24x0 Rd. Suite 100 Suite 115 L�l 4 •'/ANapa, CA Walnut Creek, CA W. Sacramento,430 East State Street, Suite 100 Area Plan VAST OAK NORTH AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS Imagery94558 45g6 CA9s69, Eagle, ID 83616 208.908.4879 LANDSCAPE AIi 7tel: 925.274.1305 tel: 9,b.zaas000Rohnert Park, California lax: 707.224.6821 DECEMBER 14, 2017 Project No. 05217 Copyright 2017 vanderToolen Associates. The drawings or written materials contained herein constitute the original and unpublished work of the landscape architect. Reproduction, use or alteration in any form is strictly prohibited without the written consent of vanderToolen Associates. 17�cn17 n=nAnrnncKIr APPLICANT PACIFIC WEST COMMUNITIES, INC. CALEB ROOPE 430 E. STATE STREET EAGLE, IDAHO 83616 (208)461-0022 ARCHITECT PACIFIC WEST ARCHITECTURE DOUGLAS GIBSON, CALIFORNIA ARCHITECT C29792 _ 430 E. STATE STREET, SUITE 100 EAGLE, IDAHO 83616 (208)-461-0022 X3021 ACCESSIBILITY # OF UNITS PERCENTAGE ADAPTABLE UNITS (ALL GRND FLR. UNITS REQ.) 58 ACCESSIBLE UNITS (10% TOTAL) 22 10.04% SENSORY IMPAIRED UNITS (4% TOTAL) 9 4.1% UNIT MIX SUMMARY CONDITIONED SQ. FOOTAGES (21) 1 -BEDROOM A UNITS (21) x 568 S.F. = 11,928 S.F. (3) 1 -BEDROOM B UNITS (3) X 520 S.F. = 1,560 S.F. (3) 1 -BEDROOM C UNITS (3) X 529 S.F. = 1,587 S.F. (81) 2 -BEDROOM A UNITS (81) x 799 S.F. = 64,719 S.F. (60) 2 -BEDROOM B UNITS (60) x 761 S.F. = 45,660 S.F. (50) 3 -BEDROOM UNITS (50) x 1,077 S.F. = 53,850 S.F. (218) UNITS TOTAL 11,968 S.F. + 1,560 S.F. + 1,587 S.F. + 64,719 S.F. + 45,660 S.F. + 53,850 S.F. = 179,304 S.F. COMMUNITY AREA 3,087 S.F. LAUNDRY AND EXERCISE AREA (AT BLDG C) 1,077 S.F. TOTAL 183,468 S.F. FIRE SPRINKLER AUTOMATIC FULLY SPRINKLERED SYSTEM WITH CENTRAL CALL STATION, OFF-SITE MONITORING AND FPC'S AT EXTERIOR ACCESSIBLE FIRE SPRINKLER CLOSETS. SITE SIZE 352,159 S.F.± (8.08 NET ACRES* ±) SITE COVERAGE SQ. FT. PUBLIC OUTDOOR OPEN SPACE 97,953 PUBLIC INDOOR OPEN SPACE (COMMUNITY BUILDING) 1,538 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE MAIN FLOOR UNITS 7,100 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE UPPER FLOOR UNITS 9,555 TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED 116,146 TOTAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED 400 X 218 UNITS 87,200 NOTE: ALL NUMBERS PROVIDED ARE ESTIMATED FOR SITE COVERAGE AND ARE NET FROM BACK OF STREET SIDEWALK AND EAST PROPERTY LINE PARKING SUMMARY TOTAL REQUIRED BY CITY OF ROHNERT PARK: (27) 1-BDRM UNITS X 1 = 27 SPACES REQUIRED (141) 2-BDRM UNITS X 2 = 282 SPACES REQUIRED (50) 3-BDRM UNITS X 2.5 = 125 SPACES REQUIRED GUEST PARKING 218/ 4 = 55 SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 489 SPACES TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED WITH 10% TRANSIT REDUCTION PER 17.16.040(B) OF ROHNERT PARK CITY CODE: 441 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED: 443 SPACES (INCLUDING 24 ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND 14 FUTURE EVSE STATIONS WHICH INCLUDES 3 COMMON EVSE STATIONS AND 1 ACCESSIBLE EVSE STATION PER 2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE) 443 SPACES W/78 TANDEM OR 17.6% AND 94 COMPACT OR 21.2% BICYCLE PARKING 218 / 4 = 55 SPACES REQUIRED 72 SPACES PROVIDED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" (6) BUILDINGS (3) 1 -BEDROOM UNITS, (15) 2 -BEDROOM UNITS, & (6) 3 -BEDROOM UNITS MAXIMUM HEIGHT - 41'-3"± (3) STORIES 9,544 S.F. FOOTPRINT OCCUPANCY R-2 FULLY SPRIKLERED PER NFPA 13 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB (2) BUILDINGS (18) 2 -BEDROOM UNITS, & (6) 3 -BEDROOM UNITS MAXIMUM HEIGHT - 41'-4"± (3) STORIES 10,146 S.F. FOOTPRINT OCCUPANCY R-2 FULLY SPRIKLERED PER NFPA 13 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB (1) BUILDING (9) 1 -BEDROOM UNITS, (15) 2 -BEDROOM UNITS, & (2) 3 -BEDROOM UNITS MAXIMUM HEIGHT - 41'-4"± (3) STORIES 9,544 S.F. FOOTPRINT OCCUPANCY R-21 B FULLY SPRIKLERED PER NFPA 13 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB (1) BUILDING MAXIMUM HEIGHT - 28'-5"± (1) STORY 3,087 S.F. FOOTPRINT OCCUPANCY A-31 B FULLY SPRIKLERED PER NFPA 13 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT# PWH 17-2 LU O a � J Fzwzdmw W LL' �o=�o°= V In UmW2Ww0C �C oIO='Q ~ °00 U zwF w U1 z zWx w LL LuJQFM U ` w � r a J o ~ In LL m W I] W = LLonzzzz LL nF, >.0 ==z '� oamzcn 00o m3<� OU CL �:' C[ �aw�cn§=' =Q Fr zomzwoz OaWzx =z d o�a F - C.7 i -Na Wo O m W U 3:F002oU O W ow�¢?mir U co I aO0z =m ccz, O. a U o z O 0 W rr °00 �z .00 ==z 00o ozz a o�a W O W U Q a zw� ccz, O. _ o �Q— Q¢vi Q IW— Uz? a a Q .fir 0Q0 N z Y W LLjT Z (nom NY�z co U w 0 ccm F'QocrO < 9 4 Cn O QZC/)_ U �w�o ag C/) Ll W q N Mao X 'IT W N cz 0 J a U 0� Y Q C< U z W z - pC U) 0 z O � D U w O 0 WU)J � z � m O U C/) Q Ir 0� Q O W 0� 1 >p O - LL� Z � z DLLz } U 0 Q c/) 0 W O 0 W �_/� v J CC a_ z z W WEATHERED CEDAR DISTRESSED WOOD MONUMENT SIGN (1 OF 2) PER OWNER SPEC. (MIN. SIGN AREA 16 S.F.) NOTE: MOUNT SECOND SIGN TO OPPOSITE SIDE OF 4 X 4 P.T. POST TO CREATE A TWO SIDED SIGN, SEE SHEET A1.1 FOR LOCATION AND ORIENTATION ACCESSIBLE SIGN LOGO (MIN. 5% SIGN AREA), HIGH CONTRAST REINFORCED CONC. FOOTING NOTE: MONUMENT SIGNAGE TO BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. G.C. TO VERIFY MONUMENT SIGN DESIGN, LOCATION, AND PROJECT NAME W/ OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. G.C. \ RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING AND OBTAINING ANY SIGN PERMITS AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS. ALL LOGOS AND TEXT TO BE HIGH CONTRAST TO BACKGROUNDS. MONUMENT SIGN 1/2" = V-0" 2:12 SLOPE � o y UNIVERSITYT DI T -R1 S C APARTMENTS SITE ADDRESS INFORMATION OFFICE XXX-XXX-XXXX TTY 1-800-367-8939 0 CONC.CAP SLOPED TO ° DRAIN 8'-2" r' r1 r\ A I T BEVELED CAP, (2) 4x4 P.T. POST SECURED TO BASE. SEE TITLEBLOCK FOR PROJECT NAME, FONT TYPE AND SIZE BY OWNER METAL PLACARD BY OWNER, TEXT WILL SHOW OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER AND TTY TELEPHONE T NUMBER AS SHOWN C, FAIR HOUSING LOGO (MIN. 5% SIGN AREA), HIGH CONTRAST NATURAL STONE BASE "COUNTRY LEDGESTONE" STYLE OR EQUAL TO MATCH ENTRY ELEMENT BASE AT BUILDING. INSTALL OVER oc SCRATCH COAT CEMENT STUCCO W/ APPROVED ANCHORS ON a CONC. BASE AND FOUNDATION I III: r COATED METAL DRIP EDGE FLASHING Zuiw AT EAVE AND RAKE, WITH CONT. CLEAT COMPOSITE SHINGLES, TO MATCH BUILDINGS, =O O 0 WITH FELT UNDERLAYMENT F.OZ o', [L Z m COATED STEEL PURLINS, SEE STRUCTURAL FOR SIZE AND SPACING, WITH STEEL END CAPS F -1 FRT PLYWOOD SHEATHING NOTE: U COORDINATE SIZE OF METAL ROOF DECK, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ENCLOSURE WITH COATED STEEL BEAMS WITH END CAPS, SEE LOCAL STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TRASH HAULER TO COATED STEEL COLUMNS, CONFIRM SEE STRUCTURAL FOR SIZE ACCESSIBILITY. 8'-0" MIN. 4__j G.C. TO VERIFY MIN./MAX. 00 HEIGHT W/ LOCAL JURISDICTIOAL 000wozw ?0 0= AUTHORITIES & TRASH HAULER CMU SOLID #5 BARS VERTICAL 24" O.C. CENTERED 8" X 8" X 16" SPLIT -FACE CMU - TAN COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING, SOLID GROUTED. PROVIDESMOOTH FACE BLOCK AT INTERIOR SIDE OF ENCLOSURE X #5 BARS HORIZONTAL @ 48" O.C. AND TO TOP C? AND BOTTOM FINISH GRADE WHERE OCCURS DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN MESH WITH VINES (TYP. 3 SIDES) T.S. 4"x4"x.188 POST - W/PRESSED STEEL POST CAP, TYP. @ EA. PIVOT POINT AA SIDE OUTLINE OF ROOFABOVE 17-0" 6'-6" 4'-0"/ 44 P.T. WOOD POST @ EACH END OF SIGN SIMPSON 'ABU' POST BASE, ORIENTED AS SHOWN W 5/8" DIA x 8" EMBED HEADED ANCHOR BOLT STONE VENEER 12" CMU WALL SOLID GROUTED #4 BAR VERT. @ 24" O.C. & ALIGNED W/ ANCHOR BOLTS #4 BAR HORIZ. @ TOP & BOTTOM FINISH GRADE 1'8" WIDE CONC. FOOTING W/ (2) #4 BARS HORIZ. @ TOP & BOTTOM WITH 3" MIN. CONCRETE COVER STANDARD HOOK, ALTERNATE BENDS, WITH 3" MIN. CONCRETE COVER NO STEP, MATCH HEIGHT OF ADJACENT WALK ma STANDARD REBAR 112"\\ j HOOK, ALTERNATE DIRECTION HINGE STANDARD PIPE HINGE W/ 9/16" SOLID PIN M 5'-8" HIGH 16 GA. ° a 6" CONC. SLAB W/ CORRUGATED STEEL 6x6/10x10 WWM @ MID DEPTH ON SHEET METAL GATE 4" GRAVEL W/HEAVY DUTY THUMB C°LATCH (SELF LATCHING) AT °42" A.F.F. a 4'-6" 8'-0„ 4'-6.. co a Q 12 THICKENED SLAB EDGE AT FRONT 2'-0" (2) #4 BARS CONT. AT FOOTING A :��_ TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION A -A 3/4" = 1 '-0" 2" DIA. SCHED 40 PIPE (TYP.) 3/8" PLATE W/ (3) 3/4" DIA. HOLES (TYP.) 3/8" PLATE W/ (3) 3/4" DIA. HOLES (TYP.) 6" DIA. PLATE �7 BICYCLE RACK DETAIL 3/4 = 1v-011 V 6" DIA. TYP. 2'- 4 1/2" Iolo, of ELEVATION TRASH ENCLOSURE 1/411 = 1 '-0" COATING MATERIAL FINISH TO BE LONG WEARING, MILDEW AND ULTRAVIOLET RAY RESISTANT COATING MADE OF POLYESTER, POLYVINYL, THERMOPLASTIC OR TGIC POWER COATING. COATED IN THE FACTORY PRIOR TO DELIVERY. -1 TYP 1 / P CONSTRUCT 2 CONCRETE FOUNDATION WHERE jNECESSARYa,_ a a 30" MIN. END SECTION 30" MIN. 0 N KEY NOTES �- 1. 30 YEAR TYPE W COMPOSITE SHINGLE, TYP. 2. PAINTED HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE/ SHAKE STYLE SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. WHITE VINYL WINDOWS. SEE FLOOR PLANS, WINDOW SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE FLOOR PLANS, DOOR SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS, PAINT AS NOTED. 7. DOOR/WINDOW TRIM, PAINT AS NOTED. 8. PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTER. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR EXTENT. COLOR AS NOTED, DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH. 9. PAINTED WOOD OUTRIGGER. COLOR AS NOTED. 10. 2x HORZONTAL TRIM PAINTED, ALIGN TRIM AS SHOWN. 11. 4" VERTICAL TRIM, TYP. 12. 1x FINISH FASCIA, MDF OR EQUAL, SEE DETAILS. 13. METAL RAILING SYSTEM. COLOR AS NOTED. SEE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS. 14. ARCHITECTURAL GABLE END VENT, PAINT AS NOTED. SEE ROOF PLANS. 15. CULTURED STONE, SET IN MORTAR BED WITH FLASHING AND WEEP SCREED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 16. COLUMN, POST, AND BEAM, REFER TO BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS & DETAILS. 17. WOOD TRIM OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS. 18. PAINTED METAL HANDRAIL. MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME B): []� A❑ BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" KNOXVILLE GRAY HC - 160 BENJAMIN MOORE �D CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" ASHWOOD MOSS 1484 BENJAMIN MOORE [E. CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE �F CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOORE �G PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY �H TRIM PAINTED WHITE ,3) SIDE - USPS MAIL BUILDING `'' 1/4" = V-0" 3 ADA COMPLIANT BOXES, RECESS MOUNTED CONCRETE 0'_o" ,W 2 2 FRONT _ USPS MAIL BUILDING 1/4 =1 0 NOTE: SOFFIT (NOT SHOWN) COLOR TO MATCH WHITE A1.2 TRIM ALL VENT TERMINATIONS AND OTHER EXTERNAL UTILITY EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT WALL SURFACE. Zuiw .Q ¢ =O O 0 F.OZ o', [L Z m Q V Z_ � 0 � Za- F -1 U V =°dwa� WIZ U V u0i _ LL W 8" X 8" X =0 z0 LL rLu O¢u_O~~ 16" < 4__j SPLIT -FACE 00 2 000wozw ?0 0= �- © = CMU SOLID Jw L= J11 zF,D0-Uii5 Cc ccclowZo2 GROUTED Q 'z�-'ocr Zoo¢oZ c� Q >0 �c EE(j Z Z Q W U F Q W W Oo ��ZZo < 0-.—. Ol U) N aO 0w 0 O ❑ a co �O001 Zr O fY F�F0wm N0 � � �?�o F_ Q ,Q = ❑ D 6" CURB ❑ C/) V~ r^ (n J V cow LU � O = a0 � STANDARD REBAR 112"\\ j HOOK, ALTERNATE DIRECTION HINGE STANDARD PIPE HINGE W/ 9/16" SOLID PIN M 5'-8" HIGH 16 GA. ° a 6" CONC. SLAB W/ CORRUGATED STEEL 6x6/10x10 WWM @ MID DEPTH ON SHEET METAL GATE 4" GRAVEL W/HEAVY DUTY THUMB C°LATCH (SELF LATCHING) AT °42" A.F.F. a 4'-6" 8'-0„ 4'-6.. co a Q 12 THICKENED SLAB EDGE AT FRONT 2'-0" (2) #4 BARS CONT. AT FOOTING A :��_ TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION A -A 3/4" = 1 '-0" 2" DIA. SCHED 40 PIPE (TYP.) 3/8" PLATE W/ (3) 3/4" DIA. HOLES (TYP.) 3/8" PLATE W/ (3) 3/4" DIA. HOLES (TYP.) 6" DIA. PLATE �7 BICYCLE RACK DETAIL 3/4 = 1v-011 V 6" DIA. TYP. 2'- 4 1/2" Iolo, of ELEVATION TRASH ENCLOSURE 1/411 = 1 '-0" COATING MATERIAL FINISH TO BE LONG WEARING, MILDEW AND ULTRAVIOLET RAY RESISTANT COATING MADE OF POLYESTER, POLYVINYL, THERMOPLASTIC OR TGIC POWER COATING. COATED IN THE FACTORY PRIOR TO DELIVERY. -1 TYP 1 / P CONSTRUCT 2 CONCRETE FOUNDATION WHERE jNECESSARYa,_ a a 30" MIN. END SECTION 30" MIN. 0 N KEY NOTES �- 1. 30 YEAR TYPE W COMPOSITE SHINGLE, TYP. 2. PAINTED HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE/ SHAKE STYLE SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. WHITE VINYL WINDOWS. SEE FLOOR PLANS, WINDOW SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE FLOOR PLANS, DOOR SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS, PAINT AS NOTED. 7. DOOR/WINDOW TRIM, PAINT AS NOTED. 8. PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTER. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR EXTENT. COLOR AS NOTED, DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH. 9. PAINTED WOOD OUTRIGGER. COLOR AS NOTED. 10. 2x HORZONTAL TRIM PAINTED, ALIGN TRIM AS SHOWN. 11. 4" VERTICAL TRIM, TYP. 12. 1x FINISH FASCIA, MDF OR EQUAL, SEE DETAILS. 13. METAL RAILING SYSTEM. COLOR AS NOTED. SEE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS. 14. ARCHITECTURAL GABLE END VENT, PAINT AS NOTED. SEE ROOF PLANS. 15. CULTURED STONE, SET IN MORTAR BED WITH FLASHING AND WEEP SCREED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 16. COLUMN, POST, AND BEAM, REFER TO BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS & DETAILS. 17. WOOD TRIM OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS. 18. PAINTED METAL HANDRAIL. MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME B): []� A❑ BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" KNOXVILLE GRAY HC - 160 BENJAMIN MOORE �D CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" ASHWOOD MOSS 1484 BENJAMIN MOORE [E. CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE �F CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOORE �G PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY �H TRIM PAINTED WHITE ,3) SIDE - USPS MAIL BUILDING `'' 1/4" = V-0" 3 ADA COMPLIANT BOXES, RECESS MOUNTED CONCRETE 0'_o" ,W 2 2 FRONT _ USPS MAIL BUILDING 1/4 =1 0 NOTE: SOFFIT (NOT SHOWN) COLOR TO MATCH WHITE A1.2 TRIM ALL VENT TERMINATIONS AND OTHER EXTERNAL UTILITY EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT WALL SURFACE. FIRST FLOOR - USPS MAIL BUILDING 1/4" = V-0" T.O. CONCRETE REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT# PWH17-2 W Zuiw .Q ¢ =O O 0 F.OZ o', [L Z m Q V Z_ � 0 � Za- O U V =°dwa� WIZ U V u0i _ LL W =0 z0 LL rLu O¢u_O~~ Q < 4__j W 00 2 000wozw ?0 0= �- © = U Jw L= J11 zF,D0-Uii5 Cc ccclowZo2 FIRST FLOOR - USPS MAIL BUILDING 1/4" = V-0" T.O. CONCRETE REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT# PWH17-2 W Zuiw .Q ¢ =O O 0 F.OZ o', [L Z m Q V Z_ � 0 � Za- O U V =°dwa� WIZ U V u0i _ LL W =0 z0 LL rLu O¢u_O~~ Q < 4__j W 00 2 000wozw ?0 0= �- © = U Jw c.) Cc zF,D0-Uii5 Cc ccclowZo2 Qww� z0 Q 'z�-'ocr Zoo¢oZ c� Q >0 °aWz�o 0-000 EE(j Z Z Q W U F Q W W ��ZZo < 0-.—. Ol U) N aO U 0 O ❑ a co �O001 Zr O fY F�F0wm N0 �?�o F_ Q ,Q = U D �Q A1.2 z 0 U W z 0 U 0 U- 0 z rz� V V J W 0 U_ CQ G w U W .Q =O O 0 Q V Z_ � 0 � G O vz _= c/) =0 z0 cry 0 0 Q Z < 4__j W > _ oZ Q � MJ W U 0OZ� � ^ V J 00 UO= Cc r Qww� z0 i W o3 >0 WW Z LL Qz Q Uz U) Lu Q Q Q 0 O r M Zr O fY r_ 00 N0 (n c\1 OcIco W = N Q ,Q = U �Qo� �Q 0 C/) V~ r^ (n J V cow LU � O = a0 � cz W q � N cao X .,t W N A1.2 z 0 U W z 0 U 0 U- 0 z rz� V V J W 0 U_ CQ G w U W Q U Y Q G vz w c/) cry 0 W � MJ W � ^ V J Q Cc 0 Lu >0 _U Z LL W Q H H U Lu U) Ir Ir 0 O > fY Z A1.2 z 0 U W z 0 U 0 U- 0 z rz� V V J W 0 U_ CQ G w U W n N G OURIVI - D 1/411 = 1'-0" � 3 BDRM 1 1/4" = 1'-0" 10'- 7 1 /R" 2'- 4" 1 1 ' - R 1/21, 4'- 1 5/8" BDRM -A 1/411 = 1 1-011 2 BDRM - A 3' 1/4" = V-0" REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q Z W OOw W,.n0 W -H �z-Zazm z u nzo-w¢w oco L W 3J=� VJ = o Q W O H= P: - O z <jz3�z W= O"oF< zw V '' t ZpU."OL IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ -0Q?'H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}W-wOzzw20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN �n 0 ¢ O co �a�wwm <zFO Q ¢~ U_ LLw }U m W H O Q E 0 W 0� U A2.1 z O U D c/) ) z O U cC O U- 0 z z G LU 0 U_ Q LU _ U .Q °0 0 QY Z 0 _ � V 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I— z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz C)U) U LU LU Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- 0 oC r- N co N . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vcow w I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' w N cz A2.1 z O U D c/) ) z O U cC O U- 0 z z G LU 0 U_ Q LU _ U Q U Y Q V � vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A2.1 z O U D c/) ) z O U cC O U- 0 z z G LU 0 U_ Q LU _ U r Q 1 1 BDRM_ B 114 = 1-O 25'-11" 1 BDRM - C 1/4" = 1'-0" REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 r�� >- h !tel Q Z W W _ WOOW_ Hza ZmF z Z u rnzOCLw¢w �. =muWiNCgg V �� L W 3 J 2 s 1 m O¢WO1H I_ P:-Oit- z� l<jz3-z W= D'oowOzw UZpU."OL IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H p0W0aoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 ¢w�OW20 tILL" ❑ U)0¢¢�D d O 0 W W <zFO Q ¢~ A2.1 A z O U D c/) z O U O U- O z z G LU 0 N .Q z0 O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0 = C) LU �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v 0 2 Er p Q W W I- U w Ir 0 o3 i O - :-W zLL az -1--j U- < UZ U) wQ Q Q ` W r (y) Z I- � N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J (n Vcow w I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d- w N cz A2.1 A z O U D c/) z O U O U- O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0 = LU m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A2.1 A z O U D c/) z O U O U- O z z G LU 0 N ?7' R" LAUNDRY & MAINTENANCE ROOM 1/411 = 1'-0" REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u rnzoCLw¢w �. V =muWiN�9 CD LL 3J2 j2(A o Q W O ~ = P O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw '' t ZpU V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt ILL" t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A2.1 B z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � C/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz c/) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz U) w Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' W N cz A2.1 B z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H vz w z C/) cry O 0= �w m c/) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A2.1 B z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N BUILDING A COLOR SCHEME A - FRONT n ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" LIMESTONE BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR BUILDING A COLOR SCHEME A - REAR 2 ELEVATION 3/16 = 1 -0 B]CEMENTITOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 [C-1 CEMENTITOUS 7" CLAPBOARD SIDING ENDURING BRONZE SW 7055 © CEMENTITOUS 7" CLAPBOARD SIDING SAGE MOUNTAIN 1488 [—E]CEMENTITOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 [—F]CEMENTITOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 LC] 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PABCO PEWTER GRAY KEY NOTES C- 1. 30 YEAR TYPE W COMPOSITE SHINGLE, TYP. 2. PAINTED HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE/ SHAKE STYLE SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. WHITE VINYL WINDOWS. SEE FLOOR PLANS, WINDOW SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE FLOOR PLANS, DOOR SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS, PAINT AS NOTED. 7. DOOR/WINDOW TRIM, PAINT AS NOTED. 8. PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTER. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR EXTENT. COLOR AS NOTED, DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH. 9. PAINTED WOOD OUTRIGGER. COLOR AS NOTED. 10. 2x HORZONTAL TRIM PAINTED, ALIGN TRIM AS SHOWN. 11. 4" VERTICAL TRIM, TYP. 12. 1x FINISH FASCIA, MDF OR EQUAL, SEE DETAILS. 13. METAL RAILING SYSTEM. COLOR AS NOTED. SEE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS. 14. ARCHITECTURAL GABLE END VENT, PAINT AS NOTED. SEE ROOF PLANS. 15. CULTURED STONE, SET IN MORTAR BED WITH FLASHING AND WEEP SCREED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 16. COLUMN, POST, AND BEAM, REFER TO BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS & DETAILS. 17. WOOD TRIM OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS. 18. PAINTED METAL HANDRAIL. MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME A): []--* A❑. BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE [B CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 1C. CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" ENDURING BRONZE SW 7055 SHERWIN WILLIAMS u CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" SAGE MOUNTAIN 1488 BENJAMIN MOORE [E CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE [F. CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOORE U PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY [H] TRIM PAINTED WHITE ❑H TRIM VVI 11 1 L REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT# PWH17-2 W z °LuW .Q J} . w . zo 'o" �z'fLzm zX- Q YZ 0 _ � r V H =°,w�W U V w¢z =Lu,'� LL w L Z1n U r, oa �o Q Z cry F J O H Z J �3m 5o w 0 LIMESTONE BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR BUILDING A COLOR SCHEME A - REAR 2 ELEVATION 3/16 = 1 -0 B]CEMENTITOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 [C-1 CEMENTITOUS 7" CLAPBOARD SIDING ENDURING BRONZE SW 7055 © CEMENTITOUS 7" CLAPBOARD SIDING SAGE MOUNTAIN 1488 [—E]CEMENTITOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 [—F]CEMENTITOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 LC] 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PABCO PEWTER GRAY KEY NOTES C- 1. 30 YEAR TYPE W COMPOSITE SHINGLE, TYP. 2. PAINTED HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE/ SHAKE STYLE SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. WHITE VINYL WINDOWS. SEE FLOOR PLANS, WINDOW SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE FLOOR PLANS, DOOR SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS, PAINT AS NOTED. 7. DOOR/WINDOW TRIM, PAINT AS NOTED. 8. PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTER. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR EXTENT. COLOR AS NOTED, DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH. 9. PAINTED WOOD OUTRIGGER. COLOR AS NOTED. 10. 2x HORZONTAL TRIM PAINTED, ALIGN TRIM AS SHOWN. 11. 4" VERTICAL TRIM, TYP. 12. 1x FINISH FASCIA, MDF OR EQUAL, SEE DETAILS. 13. METAL RAILING SYSTEM. COLOR AS NOTED. SEE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS. 14. ARCHITECTURAL GABLE END VENT, PAINT AS NOTED. SEE ROOF PLANS. 15. CULTURED STONE, SET IN MORTAR BED WITH FLASHING AND WEEP SCREED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 16. COLUMN, POST, AND BEAM, REFER TO BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS & DETAILS. 17. WOOD TRIM OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS. 18. PAINTED METAL HANDRAIL. MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME A): []--* A❑. BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE [B CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 1C. CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" ENDURING BRONZE SW 7055 SHERWIN WILLIAMS u CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" SAGE MOUNTAIN 1488 BENJAMIN MOORE [E CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE [F. CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOORE U PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY [H] TRIM PAINTED WHITE ❑H TRIM VVI 11 1 L REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT# PWH17-2 W z °LuW .Q [1 z0 O 0 . zo 'o" �z'fLzm zX- Q YZ 0 _ � r V H =°,w�W U V w¢z =Lu,'� LL w L Z1n U L W r oa �o Q Z cry F J O H Z J �3m 5o w 0 _Z} m u = 't 0O<Mozw Ztg- mJOI- I— ©2 m 0oz CI) ¢WozNrQ v02 a �E-0zoz Q U o0o¢oZ UaWZLLO >- � i Z 2 W O O 2 Z Z O w zL <OU�QaQ 0 �Q iL NQ� U U) O0OULUp�wma]- Q Q Q 0 Zr � N z0 fY DZ�O ¢ �F_ . 0 D 3 Q = A2.2 z O U D rr c/) z O U O U- 0 z z G c W 0 U 1 W _ U .Q z0 O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � VLuH O vz z _= _ c/) �O� Q� = ZZ cry O 0 Q z 0 = U Lu �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 i O - :- w zL Qz �Q Uz U) LU Q Q Q 0 LL]r cy) Zr � N z0 fY r_ co . 0 (nN Q Ocvc) W = N 1 Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J (n Vcow w T o a0 N W q � 0 Sao x d' W N A2.2 z O U D rr c/) z O U O U- 0 z z G c W 0 U 1 W _ U Q U Y _ Q VLuH _ vz z z _ c/) T_ �D cry O 0 = Lu m CI) Q 0� 0 Lu c� O _U zL �Q 0 I- U Lu / ^ Ir Ir 0 > fY z A2.2 z O U D rr c/) z O U O U- 0 z z G c W 0 U 1 W _ U BUILDING B - FRONT ELEVATION (BUILDING C AND BUILDING A COLOR SCHEME B SIMILAR) 3/16" = 1'-0" 0 LIMESTONE BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR BUILDING B - REAR ELEVATION (BUILDING A COLOR SCHEME B SIMILAR) 3/16" = 1'-0" © CEMENTITOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 FC1 CEMENTITOUS 7" CLAPBOARD SIDING KNOXVILLE GRAY HC -160 FC] CEMENTITOUS 7" CLAPBOARD SIDING ASHWOOD MOSS 1484 [E-] CEMENTITOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING G RAYSTON E 1475 F -F] CEMENTITOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 030 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PABCO PEWTER GRAY KEYNOTES - 1. 30 YEAR TYPE 'A' COMPOSITE SHINGLE, TYP. 2. PAINTED HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE/ SHAKE STYLE SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. WHITE VINYL WINDOWS. SEE FLOOR PLANS, WINDOW SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE FLOOR PLANS, DOOR SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS, PAINT AS NOTED. REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT# PWH17-2 7. DOOR/WINDOW TRIM, PAINT AS NOTED. BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE Q U W ¢ ° Y rr CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY W .z..6" 8. PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTER. SEE ROOF PLAN Q V Z Z m FOR EXTENT. COLOR AS NOTED, DOWNSPOUT TO z: O 0 rr� O1w w V _ In CL W ¢ Z U MATCH. = u w' � ��-, LL w CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" KNOXVILLE GRAY HC- O U 9. PAINTED WOOD OUTRIGGER. COLOR AS NOTED. = 160 BENJAMIN MOORE Z ~_~ ■ WLD L �- ! ~ Q z o I<n 0_ Lu Q 5Z 2i Oz } U W �cr y� Lu 10. 2x HORZONTAL TRIM PAINTED, ALIGN TRIM AS 0 W = 0O<Mozw Zu-U¢JO,- ©_ SHOWN. 1484 BENJAMIN MOORE > d ��=QU Op zLL CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 ¢Wozlo1QIf 11. 4" VERTICAL TRIM, TYP. ¢ > 0 a o a ° z o EE �- V Ir z Q or, 12. lx FINISH FASCIA, MDF OR EQUAL, SEE DETAILS. � p a o o W° p ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOOREp U 13. METAL RAILING SYSTEM. COLOR AS NOTED. SEE OaEm 0000 --OD BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS. WW I- G � w a LL w m i Lu Lu z � c O O _ z-�~ TRIM PAINTED WHITE Q Li- LU Q 14. ARCHITECTURAL GABLE END VENT, PAINT AS NOTED. SEE ROOF PLANS. 15. CULTURED STONE, SET IN MORTAR BED WITH FLASHING AND WEEP SCREED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 16. COLUMN, POST, AND BEAM, REFER TO BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS & DETAILS. 17. WOOD TRIM OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS. 18. PAINTED METAL HANDRAIL. MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME B): []� A❑. BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE Q U Y rr CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY Q w Q V SW 7029 SHERWIN WILLIAMS vz z: O 0 V J = Q Y Z_ CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" KNOXVILLE GRAY HC- O 0 = 160 BENJAMIN MOORE Lu Q m W �cr [D. CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" ASHWOOD MOSS 0 = Oz ZO c 1484 BENJAMIN MOORE > O Op zLL CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 W � ¢ > 0 BENJAMIN MOORE V Ir z Q [FFF. CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S � p 0 OU O z 3: ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOOREp O = Q r WW I- G � PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY i Lu Lu z � c O O _ ❑H TRIM PAINTED WHITE Q Li- LU Q z Uz Lu Q Q Q ILL] Z I— � Oz O NOTE: coo Q00 N O Y SOFFIT (NOT SHOWN) COLOR TO MATCH WHITE � W O Q Q = TRIM U N ~QpCfl 2 YQ Q O) ALL VENT TERMINATIONS AND OTHER EXTERNAL J UTILITY EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE � LU ( Q O ADJACENT WALL SURFACE. Lu - No J `l! X cOap 4 w N Jl- TRIM WHITE A2.3 z O I— U D rr C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G W Lu 0 U_ Q W _ U W Q U Y rr Q w V H vz w V J = cry O 0 = Lu m W Q Cc 0 Lu c U > O zLL W � U- < 0 C)U) U Lu Ir 0 w\ / I� Z A2.3 z O I— U D rr C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G W Lu 0 U_ Q W _ U W VIEW FROM KEISER AVE LOOKING 1 SOUTHEAST 1/41' = 1'-0" VIEW FROM PROPOSED PARK LOOKING WEST 1/411 = 1'-0" REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > F- !Ll Q Z L W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u rnzo-w¢w �. V =muWiN,Lj L W 3 J 2 s 1 m OQO W~= �-O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H p�oaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0n0¢�O� �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A2m3A z O U D c/) z O U cC O u— O z z G Lu 0 N Q W _ U .Q °0 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) 00 v02 r i r Q W W I— U w Ir 0 o3 i O - :-W zLL az -1--j UZ U) wo Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— � N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vo Co w � O a 0 � Lu (5 OC) x �a0 d' W N cz A2m3A z O U D c/) z O U cC O u— O z z G Lu 0 N Q W _ U Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 Lu O _U zLL �Q 0 U w Lu U) Ir 0 O w > oC z A2m3A z O U D c/) z O U cC O u— O z z G Lu 0 N Q W _ U ©CEMENTITOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING G RAYSTON E 1475 COMMUNITY BLDG - ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" [-C] CEMENTITOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING MARBLEHEAD GOLD HC -11 [El 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PABCO PEWTER GRAY [FITRIM WHITE KEYNOTES CD - 1. 30 YEAR TYPE 'A' COMPOSITE SHINGLE, TYP. 2. PAINTED HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE/ SHAKE STYLE SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. WHITE VINYL WINDOWS. SEE FLOOR PLANS, WINDOW SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE FLOOR PLANS, DOOR SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS, PAINT AS NOTED. 7. DOOR/WINDOW TRIM, PAINT AS NOTED. 8. PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTER. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR EXTENT. COLOR AS NOTED, DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH. 9. PAINTED WOOD OUTRIGGER. COLOR AS NOTED. 10. 2x HORZONTAL TRIM PAINTED, ALIGN TRIM AS SHOWN. 11. 4" VERTICAL TRIM, TYP. 12. 1x FINISH FASCIA, MDF OR EQUAL, SEE DETAILS. 13. METAL RAILING SYSTEM. COLOR AS NOTED. SEE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS. 14. ARCHITECTURAL GABLE END VENT, PAINT AS NOTED. SEE ROOF PLANS. 15. CULTURED STONE, SET IN MORTAR BED WITH FLASHING AND WEEP SCREED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 16. COLUMN, POST, AND BEAM, REFER TO BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS & DETAILS. 17. WOOD TRIM OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS. 18. PAINTED METAL HANDRAIL. MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME C): • A. CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE C CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING MARBLEHEAD GOLD HC -11 BENJAMIN MOORE LC. PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY TRIM PAINTED WHITE NOTE: SOFFIT (NOT SHOWN) COLOR TO MATCH WHITE TRIM ALL VENT TERMINATIONS AND OTHER EXTERNAL UTILITY EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT WALL SURFACE. REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT# PWH17-2 W z 0zw .Q fi w'0 O 0 w F Z, [L Z m Q Y Z_ 0 r za- O V =°,Wwad ¢z U_ �^ V J �O � Q� D = z O LL Lu 0 .0 17 °¢oFz�Fz: � IT- (All � 4--1 Lu m u 2 W O.0owOzw -z I— © _ u _6 U 0� U> d= Q U U Q W W I— z�o� U ~°-�zo� z0OQoz C7 Q i 00- mOOU m (j zLL z Q W U F Q � Z Z O W W � Q 0 - <LL] Ol C)U) U Lu . N Q U 0 O ❑ a. O co p O Q U U 0 Zr � N z0 oC F�wm . 0 �?�0 Q F_ Q Q = U �Q A2.4 z O I— U D C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G W Lu 0 U_ Q LU U W .Q O 0 Q Y Z_ 0 V O vz _= �^ V J �O � Q� D = z O cry O oQ z <12� 4--1 Lu > _ oZ Q m 0 O z - W 00 v0= 0� r Q W W I— z�o� U w o3 i W - = Li -LU zLL Qz � U- < Uz C)U) U Lu Lu QQ Q 0 O ILLIr cy) Zr � N z0 oC r_ N . 0 Wco Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �QoQ �Q 0 Vco C) LU � O a 0 � cz w g 00 N 0 �a0 X 4 W N A2.4 z O I— U D C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G W Lu 0 U_ Q LU U W Q U Y _ Q w V H _ vz w z �^ V J D cry O Lu m W Q 0� 0 Lu cr O _U zLL W � U- < 0 C)U) U Lu Ir 0 O w > oC z A2.4 z O I— U D C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G W Lu 0 U_ Q LU U W 23'- 4 112" 9'- 5 1/2" A3.2 4 73'- 10" 38'- 0" d. a[00] a , ° d a a JANITOR °.,d ° - - -- °Q 4 d ° - c - WOMEN's a _ 4 4 17 °d a- ° j a d.a - 'ESRa. FIRST FLOOR - COMMUNITY BUILDING 3/16" = 1'-0" Lo co bo 3 A3.2 REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 z o <,Z, Wn WOOW-F- ,Z-Zazm z -'� Siou d W [[Z UQ W H xUC7 2 C7 fn U -jI Z I1101� P:-0 OZ <j�3�z 0 U O W U' Z LOU z0=JOF -� J Q W p�W (7 CCQ i- a = Z pz0aoz � UaWzLLO OOU z_ " W U , _ 2i = z WOO Q Yt IN, 70 0o=�0cf) cr � Z LU a O LL W M ::)?FO =F- 3. U_ LL LU Um }U m W H =Q E 0 W 0� U A3.1 z O U D c/) z O U cC O U- 0 z z G LU 0 U_ Q LU _ U .Q ° 0 c5 Q Y Z_ 0 0 vz _= Q c/) �: QJ = z 0 cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a � MJ W 0oz � ^ V ) 00 v02 r i r Q W W I- U w Ir 0 o3 i O - :-W zLL az -1--j UZ U) wo Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— � N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo� �Q D 0 cn V~ r^ J - (n Vo Co w � O a 0 � Lu (5 � N �a0 x d W N A3.1 z O U D c/) z O U cC O U- 0 z z G LU 0 U_ Q LU _ U Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w � MJ W � ^ V ) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL �Q 0 U LU w U) Ir 0 O w > oC z A3.1 z O U D c/) z O U cC O U- 0 z z G LU 0 U_ Q LU _ U 1 FRONT COMMUNITY BUILDING 8 = V-13" B.O. JOIST 91- 1 1 /8" T.O. CONCRETE 0' - 0" V REAR - COMMUNITY BUILDING 1/8" = 1'-0" B.O. JOIST 9'- 1 1/8" T.O. CONCRETE 0'-0" 2 RIGHT - COMMUNITY BLDG 1/811 = 1v-011 LEFT - COMMUNITY BUILDING 1/8" = 1'-0" B.O. JOISTAIL 91- 1 1/811 T.O. CONCRETE o' - o° �! B.O. JOIST 91- 11/8" T.O. CONCRET�� o' -o" KEY NOTES (�:)- 1. 30 YEAR TYPE 'A' COMPOSITE SHINGLE, TYP. 2. PAINTED HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE/ SHAKE STYLE SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. WHITE VINYL WINDOWS. SEE FLOOR PLANS, WINDOW SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE FLOOR PLANS, DOOR SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS, PAINT AS NOTED. 7. DOOR/WINDOW TRIM, PAINT AS NOTED. 8. PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTER. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR EXTENT. COLOR AS NOTED, DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH. 9. PAINTED WOOD OUTRIGGER. COLOR AS NOTED. 10. 2x HORZONTAL TRIM PAINTED, ALIGN TRIM AS SHOWN. 11. 4" VERTICAL TRIM, TYP. 12. 1x FINISH FASCIA, MDF OR EQUAL, SEE DETAILS. 13. METAL RAILING SYSTEM. COLOR AS NOTED. SEE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS. 14. ARCHITECTURAL GABLE END VENT, PAINT AS NOTED. SEE ROOF PLANS. 15. CULTURED STONE, SET IN MORTAR BED WITH FLASHING AND WEEP SCREED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 16. COLUMN, POST, AND BEAM, REFER TO BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS & DETAILS. 17. WOOD TRIM OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS. 18. PAINTED METAL HANDRAIL. MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME C): [-]� A❑. CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE B CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING MARBLEHEAD GOLD HC -11 BENJAMIN MOORE PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY LDD TRIM PAINTED WHITE NOTE: SOFFIT (NOT SHOWN) COLOR TO MATCH WHITE TRIM ALL VENT TERMINATIONS AND OTHER EXTERNAL UTILITY EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT WALL SURFACE. REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 til zo Q Z W Wwn= W 00 W—E' �z�azm z nzO�w¢w Um Sp C7 2 (7 CL/U) l-�(A _j IT' zI1101� P:-0 oz j ��3�z °ZW z06¢JOF- -� J=(/7 F-2 J Q W p�W (7 CCQ a 0Q Z zp�aoz U-WZLLO U) z_ Cc W U Z' Q H Q Oz W O Q Ww�(n❑ U)�Q ErO O �UD a0wm �?FO Q ¢~ � 3 U_ LL Lu U� }U mLu �o =Q EE � >- W O� U A3.2 0 O z z G W Lu 0 N .Q O 0 Q YZ 00 5� V O vz _= � ^ V J �O � Q� = z O cry O oQ z 4__j U Lu <> z 0z a � MJ W 0Oz� � ^ V J Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�9 U w o3 i O - :- w zLL Qz � U- < Uz (n w co a Q Q 0 O ILLIr _ Z � N z0 oC r_ . 0 W c\1 Ocvc� Lu = N Q Q = U �QoQ0 �Q O V~ r^ =)U) Vcow w T O J a0 cz w g oo N Na Sao X d w N A3.2 0 O z z G W Lu 0 N Q U Y Q w V H _ vz w Z_ � ^ V J cry O Lu � MJ W � ^ V J Q 0� 0 Lu O _U zLL W � U- < 0 C)U) U Lu Ir 0 O w > oC z A3.2 0 O z z G W Lu 0 N ROOF PLAN - COMMUNITY BUILDING 1/811 = 1'-011 REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzoCLw¢w �. V =mLL,-Cn CL ,T In LL LU zI j2(A o Q W O ~ = �-O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A3.4 z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz U) w Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' W N cz A3.4 z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A3.4 z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N 6 c - 92' - 5" 97-5" FIRST FLOOR - BUILDING A 1/8" = 1'-0" REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzo�w¢w �. =muWiN�Lj V L W 3 J 2 s i m OQWO~= P: -O�z l<jz3U)z W= o'oowOzw UZpU IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!O ZWo tILL" t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A4.1 A z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz U) w Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d- W N cz A4.1 A z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y Q vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A4.1 A z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N SECOND FLOOR - BUILDING A 1/811 = 1 1-011 REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzoCLw¢w �. V =mLL,-Cn CL ,T In LL LU zI j2(A o Q W O ~ = �-O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A4.1 B z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz U) w Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' W N cz A4.1 B z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A4.1 B z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N THIRD FLOOR - BUILDING A 1/811 = 1'-0" REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzoCLw¢w �. V =mLL,-Cn CL ,T In LL LU zI j2(A o Q W O ~ = �-O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A4.1 C z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz U) w Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' W N cz A4.1 C z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A4.1 C z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N FRONT - BLDG A 1 3/32" = 1'-0" RIGHT -BLDG A 3 3/32" = 1'-0" T.O. L3 PLATE 29'- 4 5/8" T.O. L3 GYP. C. 20' - 4 1 /2" T.O. L2 GYP. C 10' - 2 3/4" T.O. CONCRETE &-� 01 -oil `J LEFT - BLDG A 4 3/32" = V-0" T.O. L3 PLATE � 29'- 4 5/8" T.O. L3 GYP. C. � 20'- 4 1/2" �! T.O. L2 GYP. C 10' - 2 3/4" T.O. CONCRETE o' - o„ I T.O. L3 PLATE 29' - 4 5/8" -7710 T.O. L3 GYP. C. � 20'- 4 1/2" T.O. L2 GYP. C � 10' - 2 3/4" .O. CONCRETE 0'-0" REAR - BLDG A 3/32" = V-0" T.O. L3 PLATE 29' - 4 5/8" _ T.O. L3 GYP. C. 20'- 4 1 /2" _ T.O. L2 GYP. C 10'- 2 3/4" T.O. CONCRETE 0'-00" KEY NOTES 1. 30 YEAR TYPE W COMPOSITE SHINGLE, TYP. 2. PAINTED HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE/ SHAKE STYLE SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. WHITE VINYL WINDOWS. SEE FLOOR PLANS, WINDOW SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE FLOOR PLANS, DOOR SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS, PAINT AS NOTED. 7. DOOR/WINDOW TRIM, PAINT AS NOTED. 8. PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTER. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR EXTENT. COLOR AS NOTED, DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH. 9. PAINTED WOOD OUTRIGGER. COLOR AS NOTED. 10. 2x HORZONTAL TRIM PAINTED, ALIGN TRIM AS SHOWN. 11. 4" VERTICAL TRIM, TYP. 12. 1x FINISH FASCIA, MDF OR EQUAL, SEE DETAILS. 13. METAL RAILING SYSTEM. COLOR AS NOTED. SEE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS. 14. ARCHITECTURAL GABLE END VENT, PAINT AS NOTED. SEE ROOF PLANS. 15. CULTURED STONE, SET IN MORTAR BED WITH FLASHING AND WEEP SCREED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 16. COLUMN, POST, AND BEAM, REFER TO BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS & DETAILS. 17. WOOD TRIM OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS. 18. PAINTED METAL HANDRAIL. MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME A): -- BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE �B CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 SHERWIN WILLIAMS C. CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" ENDURING BRONZE SW 7055 SHERWIN WILLIAMS C CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" SAGE MOUNTAIN 1488 BENJAMIN MOORE E. CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE F. CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOORE C PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY EH. TRIM PAINTED WHITE MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME B): []� A❑. BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" KNOXVILLE GRAY HC - 160 BENJAMIN MOORE �D CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" ASHWOOD MOSS 1484 BENJAMIN MOORE �E CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE n CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOORE �G PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY �H TRIM PAINTED WHITE NOTE: SOFFIT (NOT SHOWN) COLOR TO MATCH WHITE TRIM ALL VENT TERMINATIONS AND OTHER EXTERNAL UTILITY EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT WALL SURFACE. REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 LLj > F- a zw .Q ¢N n= wOow_ QY Z 0 _ � Z z Hza zmF V 0 uw¢w z _= �� ^^ VJ �O � Q� �-• V =���,,�� �-, w 3�=�in U 4__j U L w o¢11°~;_ Q Z 0Oz� z ~ } U � ♦J V! T— 0 r m Lu V � ■ � �L W ' t O'oOw(7Z0 Z p U¢ O UO I— 2 V d= Q U U LL U aWo9d �QIf Iz (n a 0¢ZO�(� Z 0 O r cy) Zr � N z0 Oa�Z�0 EE . 0 op!3z}¢wOzZ¢ (n Ocvc) Lu = N Q Q = w I—Qo� ao¢0zzw¢ Yt 0o 0 cn ¢,NQZW U J (n Vo T0¢¢0D a 0 � J4 �a0 X d w N �a�Lwm �zFo a ~ ¢ � 3 A4.2 z O U D C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G V J Lu 0 U_ CQ G w U W .Q °0 0 QY Z 0 _ � V 0 U z _= �� ^^ VJ �O � Q� = z O cry O 0 Q z 4__j U W <> _ oz Q m 0Oz� W 0 v0 2 r i 0 r a w w l— z�o� U w 03 L - Lj- w Z LL Qz Q Iz (n w�° Q Q Q 0 O r cy) Zr � N z0 oC r_ co N . 0 (n Ocvc) Lu = N Q Q = U I—Qo� �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J (n Vo Co w � O a 0 � Lu q � N �a0 X d w N A4.2 z O U D C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G V J Lu 0 U_ CQ G w U W Q U Y _ Q V H _ U z w Z_ �� ^^ VJ cry O W m W Q 0� 0 Lu >p _U Z LL 0 Q H U w Lu U) Ir 0 O w > oC z A4.2 z O U D C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G V J Lu 0 U_ CQ G w U W ROOF PLAN - BLDG A 1/8" = 1'-0" REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzoCLw¢w �. V =mLL,-Cn CL ,T In LL LU zI j2(A o Q W O ~ = �-O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A4.4 z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � C/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 00z� c/) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz U) w Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— � N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' W N cz A4.4 z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H vz w z C/) cry O 0= �w m c/) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A4.4 z O U D z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N 1Agi'-R" FIRST FLOOR - BUILDING B 1/811 = 1'-01' REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzo�w¢w �. =muWiN�Lj V L W 3 J 2 s i m OQWO~= P: -O�z l<jz3U)z W= o'oowOzw UZpU IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!O ZWo tILL" t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A5mlA z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N I Q z00 0 QY Z 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) 00 v02 0� r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz C)U) U LU LU o Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I- � N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vo Co w � O a 0 � cz Lu (5 OC) x �a0 d- W N cz A5mlA z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A5mlA z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N 2—BEDROOM UNIT B 761 SF llllll �Mil 3 -BEDROOM 2 -BEDROOM UNIT A 2 -BEDROOM UNIT B 2—BEDROOM UNIT A SECOND FLOOR - BUILDING B 1/811 = 1'-0" II- 2 -BEDROOM UNIT B 2—BEDROOM UNIT A 3 -BEDROOM REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 ,' LLJ > �- Q z W Q 0�- EL' � wn - Woow- Q� o �5� �z-Zazm z O vz nzoCLw¢w _= c) �O � a) V= Cy LL, -,T O W 0= 3�=:icn U C) Lu o¢�°~� Q Z l� I- P:-Oit- z� z ~ o } U V! T— r m Lu u W 2 t ° O'oOWC7ZFW ZpU¢�O-- U(�2 I— Vd= �' Q U) -1--jUZ F- Q 0 U) a F- 0 Cr. (� r (� Z I— � N 0 z Oa�z 0 EE . 0 z}a-wOzZ.20 0 3: �Qo(.c) aQzzo ¢woO.2 � 0 cn V~ U J Z Un Vo T0¢¢oD a 0 � Lu (5 OC)N C:) OC) x d w N ma1�wm �zFO a Er� A5.1 B z O U D c/) z O U cC O u- 0 z z G Lu 0 U_ Q LL] _ U Q 0�- z Q� o �5� O vz _= c) �O � a) = z 0 cry O oQ z 0= C) �> 0z a m 0oz CI) 00 v02 r i r Q W W I— U w Ir 0 03 L O — U—z LU Z zLL U) Q -1--jUZ u- < 0 U) w o Q Q Q ` W r (� Z I— � N 0 oC r- co N . 0 U) Ocvc� LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Z Un Vo Co w � O a 0 � Lu (5 OC)N C:) OC) x d w N A5.1 B z O U D c/) z O U cC O u- 0 z z G Lu 0 U_ Q LL] _ U Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 Lu O _U zLL u- < 0 C)U) U Lu Ir 0 O w > oC z A5.1 B z O U D c/) z O U cC O u- 0 z z G Lu 0 U_ Q LL] _ U 1� THIRD FLOOR - BUILDING B 1/811 = 1'_O„ REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzoCLw¢w �. V =mLL,-Cn CL ,T In LL LU zI j2(A o Q W O ~ = �-O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A5mlC z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz U) w Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' W N cz A5mlC z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A5mlC z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N FRONT - BLDG B 1 3/32" = 1'-0" _ T.O. L3 PLATE 29'- 4 5/8" T.O. L3 GYP. C. 20' - 4 1 /2" T.O. L2 GYP. C � 10' - 2 3/4" T.O. CONCRETE �� 0'-0" 1 LEFT - BLDG BRIGHT - BLDG B 3/32" = 1'-0" 3/32" = V-0" REAR - BLDG B 3/32" = 1'-0" 3 PLATE � GYP. C. � 4 1/2" V GYP. C )' - 2 3/4" VCRETE � 0' - 0.. T.O. L3 P_LATE 29' - 4 5/8" T.O. L3 GYP. C. 20' - 4 1 /2" T.O. L2 GYP. C � 10' - 2 314" O. CONCRETE 0'-0" T.O. L3 PLATE 29'- 4 5/8" .O. L3 GY_P. C. � 20'- 4 1/2" F.O. L2 GYP. C t 10' - 2 3/4" D. CONCRETE 0'-0" KEY NOTES CD - 1. 30 YEAR TYPE'A' COMPOSITE SHINGLE, TYP. 2. PAINTED HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE/ SHAKE STYLE SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. WHITE VINYL WINDOWS. SEE FLOOR PLANS, WINDOW SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE FLOOR PLANS, DOOR SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS, PAINT AS NOTED. 7. DOOR/WINDOW TRIM, PAINT AS NOTED. 8. PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTER. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR EXTENT. COLOR AS NOTED, DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH. 9. PAINTED WOOD OUTRIGGER. COLOR AS NOTED. 10. 2x HORZONTAL TRIM PAINTED, ALIGN TRIM AS SHOWN. 11. 4" VERTICAL TRIM, TYP. 12. 1x FINISH FASCIA, MDF OR EQUAL, SEE DETAILS. 13. METAL RAILING SYSTEM. COLOR AS NOTED. SEE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS. 14. ARCHITECTURAL GABLE END VENT, PAINT AS NOTED. SEE ROOF PLANS. 15. CULTURED STONE, SET IN MORTAR BED WITH FLASHING AND WEEP SCREED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 16. COLUMN, POST, AND BEAM, REFER TO BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS & DETAILS. 17. WOOD TRIM OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS. 18. PAINTED METAL HANDRAIL. MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME A): [A. BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE [B. CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 SHERWIN WILLIAMS �C CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" ENDURING BRONZE SW 7055 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" SAGE MOUNTAIN 1488 BENJAMIN MOORE �E CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE L' - CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOORE �G PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY �H TRIM PAINTED WHITE MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME B): [-1--* A.. BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE B❑ CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 SHERWIN WILLIAMS �C CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" KNOXVILLE GRAY HC - 160 BENJAMIN MOORE ED] CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" ASHWOOD MOSS 1484 BENJAMIN MOORE �E:. CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE u CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOORE EG] PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY 0 TRIM PAINTED WHITE NOTE: SOFFIT (NOT SHOWN) COLOR TO MATCH WHITE TRIM ALL VENT TERMINATIONS AND OTHER EXTERNAL UTILITY EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT WALL SURFACE. REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 LLj > F- a zw .Q ¢N n= Oow_ Q YZ 00 5� za m H�w= V o U 6�w¢w _= a� r V Cn CL im. -V �'2'TF LLw 0 Q z _j I= U 4--1 L w < > _ oZ Q m U 0Oz� P:-O�-z-D- z ~ } U � ♦J V! T— CD r m Lu V ■ 2 W ' t O"o F< ZU Z p U¢ O UO H 2 V d= Q U U LL U D U- Q Uz (n w�° Za¢ZO� 0 O Q Zr � N z0 Oa�Z�� E . 0 z "0. 'o Q = LLJ I—QoQ0 a¢zzo g O 0 cn V~ r^ J =)(n Vo 0"ZU ¢2Oco t�n0o a o � Lu q � N x �O �a0 "twN cz 0wma�o zF a ¢~ � 3 A5.2 z O U D C/) z O U 0 1— O z rz� V V J Lu 0 U_ CQ G LU U W .Q °o 0 Q YZ 00 5� V o U z _= a� r � /1 ^ �: =z o cry O 0 Q z 4--1 Lu < > _ oZ Q m U 0Oz� W Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I— z�o� U w o3 i Q Li - LU- z Z LL Q D U- Q Uz (n w�° Q Q Q 0 O ILLIr Zr � N z0 oC r_ co . 0 (nN Q Ocvc� LU = N 1 Q = U I—QoQ0 �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J =)(n Vo Co w � O a o � Lu q � N x �a0 "twN cz A5.2 z O U D C/) z O U 0 1— O z rz� V V J Lu 0 U_ CQ G LU U W U Y Q V H _ U z w Z_ � /1 ^ cry O Lu m W Q 0� 0 Lu >p _U Z LL 0 D U- Q H U w Lu U) Ir 0 O w > oC z A5.2 z O U D C/) z O U 0 1— O z rz� V V J Lu 0 U_ CQ G LU U W ROOF PLAN - BLDG B 1/811 = 1'-0" REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzoCLw¢w �. V =mLL,-Cn CL ,T In LL LU zI j2(A o Q W O ~ = �-O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A5.3 z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz U) w Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' W N cz A5.3 z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A5.3 z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N FIRST FLOOR - BUILDING C 1/811 = 1'-0" NOTE: SEE BUILDING A FOR EXTERIOR WALL DIMENSIONS REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > F- !Ll Q z L W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzoCLw¢w �. V =mLL,-Cn CL ,T In co LL zI j2(A o Q W O ~ = �" �-O z (All2jz3Mz W= o'ooIOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A6mlA z O U D c/) z O U cC O u— O z z G Lu 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W zLL az -1--j u- < Uz U) w Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— � N 0 oC r- N . 0 (nco Q Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J (n V w cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' W N cz A6mlA z O U D c/) z O U cC O u— O z z G Lu 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 Lu O _U zLL u- < 0 C)U) U Lu Ir 0 O w > oC z A6mlA z O U D c/) z O U cC O u— O z z G Lu 0 N SECOND FLOOR - BUILDING C 1/811 = 1'-0" REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzoCLw¢w �. V =mLL,-Cn CL ,T In LL LU zI j2(A o Q W O ~ = �-O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A6.1 B z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz U) w Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' W N cz A6.1 B z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A6.1 B z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N 1 THIRD FLOOR - BUILDING C 1/8" = V-0" REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzoCLw¢w �. V =mLL,-Cn CL ,T In LL LU zI j2(A o Q W O ~ = �-O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A6mlC z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz C)U) U LU LU Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao N d WNv A6mlC z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A6mlC z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N ,- FRONT -BLDG C 1 3/32" = 1'-0" T.O. L3 PLATE 29'- 4 5/8" T.O. L3 GYP. C. 20'_ 4 1 /2" T.O. L2 GYP. C 10' - 2 3/4" T.O. CONCRETE g- o' - off "V RIGHT - BLDG C LEFT - BLDG C 3/32" = 1'-0" '--? 3/32" = V-0" REAR - BLDG C 3/32" = l' -O" T.O. L3 PLATE 29' - 4 5/8" T.O. L3 GYP. C. &:) 20' - 4 1/24' 71 T.O. L2 GY_P. C 10' - 2 3/4" T.O. CONCRETE o' - 0"� T.O. L3 _PLATE 29'- 4 5/8" T.O. L3 GYP. C. 20' - 4 1 /2" T.O. L2 GYP. C 10'-23/4" T.O. CONCRETE 0' - T.O. L3 PLATE 29'- 4 5/8" T.O. L3 GYP. C. 20' - 4 1 /2" 1 T.O. L2 G_YP. C t 10'- 2 3/4 T.O. CONCRETE � KEY NOTES -- i 1. 30 YEAR TYPE 'A' COMPOSITE SHINGLE, TYP. 2. PAINTED HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE/ SHAKE STYLE SIDING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. WHITE VINYL WINDOWS. SEE FLOOR PLANS, WINDOW SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE FLOOR PLANS, DOOR SCHEDULE, AND SPECIFICATIONS, PAINT AS NOTED. 7. DOOR/WINDOW TRIM, PAINT AS NOTED. 8. PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTER. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR EXTENT. COLOR AS NOTED, DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH. 9. PAINTED WOOD OUTRIGGER. COLOR AS NOTED. 10. 2x HORZONTAL TRIM PAINTED, ALIGN TRIM AS SHOWN. 11. 4" VERTICAL TRIM, TYP. 12. 1x FINISH FASCIA, MDF OR EQUAL, SEE DETAILS. 13. METAL RAILING SYSTEM. COLOR AS NOTED. SEE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS. 14. ARCHITECTURAL GABLE END VENT, PAINT AS NOTED. SEE ROOF PLANS. 15. CULTURED STONE, SET IN MORTAR BED WITH FLASHING AND WEEP SCREED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 16. COLUMN, POST, AND BEAM, REFER TO BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS & DETAILS. 17. WOOD TRIM OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS. 18. PAINTED METAL HANDRAIL. MATERIAL FINISHES (SCHEME B): BORAL BUCKS COUNTRY RANDOM ASHLAR LIMESTONE CEMENTITIOUS SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING AGREEABLE GRAY SW 7029 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" KNOXVILLE GRAY HC - 160 BENJAMIN MOORE FD.. CEMENTITIOUS CLAPBOARD SIDING 7" ASHWOOD MOSS 1484 BENJAMIN MOORE E0. CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING GRAYSTONE 1475 BENJAMIN MOORE F❑ CEMENTITIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING COLLECTOR'S ITEM AF -45 BENJAMIN MOORE �I PABCO 30 YEAR COMPOSITE SHINGLE PEWTER GRAY [H TRIM PAINTED WHITE NOTE: SOFFIT (NOT SHOWN) COLOR TO MATCH WHITE TRIM ALL VENT TERMINATIONS AND OTHER EXTERNAL UTILITY EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT WALL SURFACE. BUILDING C TO USE COLOR SCHEME B - SEE A2.3 FOR COLOR MATERIAL SAMPLES FOR THIS SCHEME REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 LLJ > F- a zw Q ¢N n= wOow_ Q Y Z 00 � Z Z Hza ZmF V O u D66�w¢w _= a� r _ �: Q� �-• V = � Lu L-, LL w 0 = 4--1 LL o¢�O~� Q Z U 0Oz� P:-O�-z- z ~ o } U � ♦J V! T— 0 r m Lu V�■ � �L W ' t O"o F< Z U Z p U¢ O L UO I— 2 V d= Q U U U �Q0 '<ZD FQ Uz U) a OL 0' gZ,0 ILLIr = cy) Zr [-- 0 O r_ N NO . 0 Z }a- W OO¢ Q ,Q = V"I �QoQ0 a¢zzo 3F'OOw. 0 0 cn ¢� N Q Z W U J =)(n Vo 0 CL n 0 ¢ ¢ 0 co a 0 � W q � N x 1:cc �a0 "t W N cz a0Lwm o a ¢F- A6.2 z O U D C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G W Lu 0 U_ CQ G LU _ U W Q °0 0 Q Y Z 00 � V O U z _= a� r _ �: Q� = z O cry O 0 Q z 0 = 4--1 Lu < > _ oZ Q m U 0Oz� W 0 00 2 r i 0 r Q W W I— z�o� U w 03 L Q O - Li- LU zLL Qz �Q0 Uz U) we Q Q Q 0 O ILLIr = cy) Zr [-- 0 oC r_ N NO . 0 Wco Ocvc) W = N Q ,Q = U �QoQ0 �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J =)(n Vo Co W � O a 0 � W q � N x �a0 "t W N cz A6.2 z O U D C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G W Lu 0 U_ CQ G LU _ U W U Y _ Q V H _ U z w z _ cry O 0 = Lu m W Q 0� 0 Lu O _U zLL W �Q0 C)U) U Lu Ir 0 O w > oC z A6.2 z O U D C/) z O U O U- 0 z z G W Lu 0 U_ CQ G LU _ U W 1 ROOF PLAN - BLDG C 1/811 = 1 1-01' REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 12/15/17 DRAWN BY BP PROJECT # PWH17-2 > LU �- LU Q z W W wn - WOOw-H ,z-Zazm z u nzoCLw¢w �. V =mLL,-Cn CL ,T In co LL LU zI j2(A o Q W O ~ = �-O z �jz3�z W= o'oowOzw V IV J LL Q W p�W CJ CCQ z0Q?�H pzoaoz UaWzLLO z}WwOzZ.20 op!3�°COZWo Yt IN, t0,Ft 0co �a�LLwm <zFO Q ¢~ A6.3 z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q z0O 0 Q YZ 0 _ � 0 vz _= Q � � c/) �O � QJ = z O cry O 0 Q z 0= C) �>_ 0z a m 0oz CI) Q v02 0� CD r Q W W I- z�o� U w o3 O :- W z zLL U) a U- < Uz C)U) U LU LU Q Q Q ` W r (y) Z I— [-- N 0 oC r- N co . 0 U) Ocvc) LU = N 1 Q Q = U �Qo(.c) �Q 0 cn V~ r^ J Un Vw cow ;I- o a0 Lu (5 � N x Sao d' W N cz A6.3 z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N Q U Y _ Q w H _ vz w c/) = cry O 0= �w m CI) Q 0� 0 LU O _U zLL U- < 0 C)U) U LU Ir 0 O w > oC z A6.3 z O U D c/) z O U cC O U— O z z G LU 0 N F�/v _'� OWN -0E i� OEM I I N I I I I C I mlm;,A im! I w� ;J +78 FC-1—cl C C C C C ��IlllllllTb��llllllllllllllllllllll��� vlwl �� IriW! AIIIm1\ MUM \iLiml W, : I�IE +78 C C C C C C C C -----------------------------+7 I C C �I I I I I I I C C C I C CEOCI I C C ' I C C C C I C C C I C ' ' I C C C_ C C C C C C C C C C C C C () 1 SITE 3ELECTRICAL NORTH 111 1 C C C C C I ' 0 C I LU C O O C Q z C cn W 1 .00 C I 14 C ' N m C U) Q C I �o W C 00(D �> Q C z� C' C I C I C A. FROM O NONL rNO NNNON K. ! NRW ! rOR a Fen roIR1Ne SOW Rt imam o NL L COIINIU071 ■ 181110E O OOOORRI RN N1. RMF, 1efNM aRl vRE NN Nr aIle aE unulN NNINN Nrt For urNo R a®1, a�1 NE aN NRwRN G OOIOCIaI III #ONDO7 UMRRRNO Vmm 1ONN 8n0 FO A ONOIOR O ReNN6 OODL 0. M CONNVCIOI ala FNNO RORRO O 7: RIOROFJC7 ORF maN7 R InOL merRynuv mirarr ANrt E NL IAOORRN aQ OOOVO Z E Mo O NODE fOD-U 5 011111110E LAW RUM NO ALL REMAIN OR LOOT VOW a 1u ..RN IR.N WN aw1. R no 1.6 a FUME Im FON Bd OODN A OOWR "0"1 N 11E ONYRIY YON6 O MINI L 9670/1. MUM W COMM OaO IIIR FUIPE LIMON WIN "OR /mi Lamm DOORS OR NRYL CONIROIOR FO A OORC IIOIPII® OOOIR 11018 1011OFR 1 RNE R\RAN FNRrt OE ON r ROY 1E OO: O1L = A PBBNR Alk IW 00 OF III REOE O 10 E MUD R ILS nrx r -r wt Plmr A waN NN rEr NN oOR R10IRRIF: K Vert FOOM II M CIII11141110 10 11107 FOOBIL' 11100119 l ► A FRN O 10 K SOOMmA, A ROAII FNI VRr K a NON NN 1E OOBIP $111=0101 N OON m PDNE W 111M >E ®N FR1E Plaveea L ALMEE11GN01110AL CLOCK K COMM m R 1NICLOO NN PIONOIL FO 11101. KM KEM NOM 1.1110 O RIE OWL #1 ON am El 0L LNIN11311' aR UMM 000100 A1N10 N ROD 10 VOW W Of IONOBf sw SLOW IOK L M IOE 00910) OIN1091 eCnDAF. CAPOORE OM' 100100 LORR MM RR UNIT San PLUI O OW LrAO NO O3aOR0a E'NG-T-IV UR IMG 440 East Corporate Dr., Ste. 103 Meridian ID 83642 ph 208-288-2181 fax 208-288-2182 project REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 8/03/17 DRAWN BY JJF PROJECT# PWH 17-2 LU O J u ++ `` �z�zC7¢w r O ¢ O O 20nH W �� V Uo0 W 2 L 1.1. . L1Q ® =C70oO �' J Z Z Z W W W '0L-' 3 r �JUZZ Om LU --1.—L W Qc�_oO�o [V] T ¢ _ ?L ¢ mW V ����z� ¢ z¢co'-r' Q W �Ou�QJ Sa R z0 O ¢ z O Z ¢ U ¢ D } d } O z Q 0¢ w Z 0 U < O F- O U ¢a��zt~—m¢ o ZD x ¢ n co 2 J z0 U LL.I O z 0 0 ~z LU U O O Q z �< cn 0 .00 = LU <o� m ==z U) Q m 0 �o W CC 00(D �> Q ozz z� OU Q O Q 0 w 3: U � _ a z w Cr - 0 � Q — Qu) �+ V ULj () 1 SITE 3PHOTOMETRIC NORTH �' NGINEER ING 440 East Corporate Dr., Ste. 103 Meridian ID 83642 ph 208-288-2181 fax 208-288-2182 project REVISIONS COPYRIGHT DATE 8/03/17 DRAWN BY JJF PROJECT# PWH17-2 W O � rz�zC7�w r U O P O O + `` 2 cnHwppU U o0 LL 2 W w CC = 0 0 p O LL Q W Wm Z Z Z 2 WL o��Q�ig: Ln r a? JO�OQ Z5cr LL a T Cr O V z O z Q W i V Z¢o r m w � � .r jyy W L.Lr Q W Orn QJ 2a Z D Z LUi 1 p Z Q p > a :Z3 CLy Z- Q Q W H O Q F- CC: H O = U �l o Cr p - H- Sm 11-ia H CE U E1.01 0 U U) 0 U 0 LL 0 z LU U) U Q 75 LU U Z 0 C) ~z W U 0 (.D co 0 o= O O � w m U) Q =2 Z cc r) rr w CC rr �> Q 00(-D zw D Z Z < ¢ 0U Q U LU 0 0 o� � `X U � _ ¢ ¢ z w CC Z , O ¢ — =3 ¢ ¢ vi V C) w ¢z¢ z F- O O C- o z pC Q ¢ i Q H 0 U) Qzo w ¢ ¢ 0 to U) O M0 N 0 o . U -i wCz C' I..L- W N E1.01 0 U U) 0 U 0 LL 0 z LU U) U Q 75 LU U ¢ U Y ¢ d W LU Z ~z 2 O Ir U co 0 o= � w m U) Q cc r) w CC �> Q zw < U U LU 0 U) pr W 0 o� � z z E1.01 0 U U) 0 U 0 LL 0 z LU U) U Q 75 LU U IA N mlb L/THON/A L/GHT/Ni nomboer LDN6-30/10-L06AR-LD DDB Notes FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS Series INTENDED USE -Typical applications include corridors,lobbies, conference moms and private offices. Lumens' CONSTRUCTION - Galvanized steel mounting/plaster frame; galvanized steel junction box with T ype A bottom -hinged accessavers and spring latches. Reflectors are retained by torsion springs. Voltage Vertically adjustable mounting brackets with commercial bar hangers provide 3-3/4" total adjustment. 27/ 2700K Two combination %"-374"and four knockouts for straight -through conduit runs. (apaciry:8(4in,cl L06 Downlight out). No. 12 AWG conductors, rated for 90'C. L D N 6 Accommodates 12"-24"joist spacing. LED Litepuff Passive cooling thermal management for 25°C standard; high ambient (400(1 option available. Light 10 10001umem, 30 3000 lumens engine and fireman, accessiblefrom above or belowceiling. Wit White Max ceiling thickness 1-1/2". 6" OPEN and WALLWASH LED OPTICS- LEDs are binned toa 3-stepSDCM; 80 CRI minimum. Non -I( LED light source concealed with diffusing optical lens. New Construction Downlight General illumination lighting with 1.0 SINN and 550(utoffto source and source image. LS Specular Self -flanged anodized reflectors in specular, semi -specular, or matte diffuse finishes. Alsoavailablein building entrances, multi -use facilities, apartment buildings, institutions, and black �k ...CTte Multi volt (120-277V, ELECTRICAL-Multi-volt(120-277V,50/60Hz)eldoLED 0-10V dimming drivers mounted to junction - IGHT LOCAlION- � O box,10%ort% minimum dimming level available. 3471 347V 70 OV dimming mai enancture equires atS0,00 ours. additional low -voltage wires to be Dulled. 70%lumen maintenan<eat50,000 hours. _ LISTINGS- Certified to US and Canadian safety standards. Damp location standard (wet location, Construction Covered ceiling optional). ENERGY STAR• mrfified product. ®� ' WARRANTY- 5 -year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at Slim, low -profile LED design wwwaaitvbrandscum/CustomerResources/Terms and anditionsasox _ `� Note:Adual performance may it asa result ofend-userenvironment and application. 1 If j All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditionsat 25°C. - Specifications subject to change without notice. High ambient option A+ Capable options Indicated EZl eldoLED I%0 -10V by this color background. TRW' White painted flange Lead fimeswill vary depending an options selected. (onmlt with your sales representative. Example: LDN635/15 L06AR LSS MVOLT EZ10 LUNG N mlb 40K 120 DDB Series PerformancePackage Series Color temperature Lumens' Aperture/Trim Color P1 Finish Voltage LUNG 6" round 27/ 2700K 05 5001umens 25 25001tromm L06 Downlight AN Clear ISS Semi -specular MVOU Multi -volt LED Litepuff 30/ 3000K 10 10001umem, 30 3000 lumens L16 Wallwash Wit White LD Mattedlffuse 120 1ZOV OPTICS 35/ 3500K 15 1500lumens 40 40001umens level pathway illumination including stairs. BRI Black LS Specular 277 277V building entrances, multi -use facilities, apartment buildings, institutions, 40/ 4000K 20 20001umens 50 5000lumens Lang -life LEDs, coupled with a high -efficiency driver, provide extended service life. Standard input= 35 LINEAR LED watts, 88 lumens per watt. FMLL is rated to deliver L70 performance at 50,000 hours. Fixture operatesat 3471 347V volts, 6014z.LISTIN _ LISTINGS Construction CSA certified to US and Canadian standards. Listed for damp locations. ENERGY STAR' certified. electrical wiring compartment. Driver Slim, low -profile LED design Options Integral LED electronic driver www.acuitybmnds.com/CustomerResources/Terms and conditions.asox with rugged one-piece, die-cast EZ10 eldoLED 10% DAN SF' Single (us, HAD- High ambient option Specifications subject to change without notice. EZl eldoLED I%0 -10V a TRW' White painted flange CP Chicago Plenum Surge Protection: styles incorporate both a small illumination. Optical assembly TRBV Blackpaintedflange WL Wet location includes impact -resistant Crosstour is protected with a Mounting: ELR Batter ack remote YP ( RPL - RELO(•-read luminaire mnnectorsenable a Y sits leand consistent P and 26W. The medium housing 9 requirements for full cutoff ELI Batterypack ■■Ir/ factoryi across allABIL fer compliance, Available in seven P owner coat aint. Super durable P P NP580EZ7 nLi ht•dimmin pack controls 9 9P drivers. forcomplete nomenclature. Availableonly in here o enclaure.An leonlhurricane in and RRLC12S. RUA, RRL, RRLoRRL RRLA, RRLB, RRLAf, _ electrical connections with the NPSBOEZER7 nLighr•dlmm]ngpackmntrols0-10VeldoLEDdrivemER ', USPOM US point ofmamfacture LEDs: supplied push -in connectors. Back Electrical controls fine res on emergencycircuit. Finish: box includes three half-inch, NPT LED driver is mounted to the New 1 Overall height vanes bawd on lumen acka enter to dimensional than onpage3. 9 D 9• Accessories:Orderosepamtemtolognumba 2 Notavailablewishfinishes. 3 Nola art,le with emergency options, 9 VD EAC ISSM 375 Compactinterru interruptible emergency AC Owers stem -0 9 Y D Y 4 t V l 20 on Y EAC ISSM 125 Cam dctinterru tible emergency AC Owers stem 5Availablewlthcler MR)O cwronly. GRA68JZ Oversized trimring with 8"outsidediameter' 6 Aad^SD"rarselL-diagnoni[aption (i.e. Et501 SCA6 Sloped ceiling adapter.RefertoTECH-SCpformoreoptions. 7Must specify voltage 120Vorznv. 8 1 inure height is 6.5' for all lumen packag es with H AO. DOWNLIGHTING LDN6 BE21 21" Era' Bell PicoEmitter® LED IUM LIGHTING kl-bel7eled_spec.pdf JOB TYPE P3 NOTES APPROVALS FEATURES Certifications • PicoEmitter•technology' • 0-1 OV dimming drivers standard • Available in 580nm 3000K, 4000K and 5000K • IP66 certified a UL K standard CCT LMO ■ Type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, R, L standard distributions aoxsmaeamerccrso°I, SPECIFICATIONS 19V., 4905 mm) APpmor. Welght = 461bs.EPA 0.8 fo, IA. See Configuration for Additional EPA, (533.4 mm) ORDERING CODE 28 BE21 4 E35 120E SK UV DB 1A ,1 Arm Side ML 0.8 5xWre P-isld4.gtiolL Driw Cunent Source Color Temperature' Voltages BL Black A30 120V Burton Photocell 2B ZAm SMe Mt. 1.6 BE21 1 Type I E35 350mA PicoEmitter 120L 120 LEDs 2K 580n0 UV 120-277V DB Dark Bronze A31 208V Button Photocell Y 3Y' 3Am Side ML 2.4 2 Type II 3K 3000K GT Graphite A32 240V Button Photocell 347347W 4SC 4Am Side MI. 2.8 Type 4K 000K LG Light Gray A33 27N Button Photocell 4 IV 548048OV' N 7 W Single Wall MI Na d Type IV SK OOOK PS Platinum Silver A34 480V Button Photocell 5 TypeV TT itanium WH White A35 347V Burson Photocell awAu,mr49aeww. aAi:saras.evrA R Type R Right CC Custom Color* L Type L, Left •Coach Ree m=use 4 SF 120,277,347UreVolb IS Polywnbonate NFONeighbor Friendly Wireless Pole Arm Pole Tenon Mount I"=}�I M. jryg Lens'- Optic, formerly WIR-RMI-10120-34N 1000'ran a Wika DF 208, 240,480UneVohs P .P try 9 PQ HAOU HA01L-TMI Pmt Top Crook available for Type RF mesh control system with HA02L HA02L-TM1, HA02L-TM2, RA02L-W Side Pole Crook III11V All others, nffloddim, motion, photo, HA02L-TM3, HA02L-TM4 consult factory GPSmeterin, up;bilfids. ng HA03L HAOX-TMI, HA03L-TM2, Pat Top Swept Cast Arm and metering capabilities. HA03L-TM3, HA03L-TM4 Motion HAUL HA11L-TM1, HA, IL-TM2, HA11L-W Side Pole Swept Cast Arm Round role Mounted HAUL -T 3 AlIL- M4 SCLR M,H T Oca n Senses to 16' Pa ry W HAl2L HA72L-TM HA72L-TM2 HA72L- Side Pole S -Sha U 1 W Ped P 5 L. care Pole Mounted HA72L-11113, HA72L-TM4 Can Arm C S k HAArm Occupancy Senseup to l6' HA74L HA14L-TMI, HA744TM2, HA74L-W Side Pole Neo.Classic Arm SCAR Routs role Mounted HA14L-TM3, HA74L-TM4 A L- 2 1 - Side Pole Arm w/ro Scroll H 31L HA31L-TMT HA31 TM HA3 L W Ocwpanry Senses 16'to 30' P SCH-SO' re Pole Mounted HA31L-TM3, HA314TM4 Occupancy sense l6' ro 30' HA33L HA33L-TM1, HA33L-TM2, HA33L-W Side Pole Ribbon Amt HA33L-TM3, HA33L-TM4 wOop Gusset HA35L HA35L-TM1 HA35L-W Side Pole Ribbon Arm wflop Brace HA37L HA37L-TM1 HA37L-W Side Pok Ribbon wrtap For Pole Spm Select: htlp:/h%w ..kimlighfing.coMrms pmducwaand-poles/ Braze Bottom 5.11 For Control Spm Select hthiltopsstcom4ndex.hunl HA38L HA38L-TM1 HA38L-W Side Pok Rihhanw/lop Brace, Bottom Gusset ' US Patent No. D674,965 S. Other patents pending. s 35OmA only. ' For custom optics and color temperature confgurationxcomad factory. s Use only when vandalism is anticipated to be high. Required only for Kim Lighting reserves the right to sTunle friendly. vandal protection in locations where fixtures can be reached by change specifications without notice. ' 347V & 480V cummuc may be supplied with step-down vanformer. unauthorized persons. 0 2017 KIM LIGHTING 1 17760 Rowland Street I City of Industry I CA 91748 HUBBELL I 1 P626,968.5666 I F626.369.2695 1 www.kimlighting.com I Rev. May 16 2017 — Lighting I_A L/THON/A L/GHT/NG® �nN9 Number OLLWD LED 40K 120 DDB Notes FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS Type WSJ INTENDED USE Provides years of maintenance -fee illumination for outdoor use in residential & commenial applications. Ideal for applications -In as lighting walkways and stairways for safety and security. Outdoor General Purpose CONSTRUCTION Cast -aluminum housing with(oraion-resistant paint in either dark bronze orwhim finish. 01 1 1A'D O o1 1 1A111 ADA compliant. L L VY « L L VY V OPTICS LED WALL CYLINDER LIGHT 4DOOK CO LEDs. Polycerbenate lens protects the LED from moisture, dirt and other Contaminants. LUMEN MAINTENANCE: The LED will deliver 70% of i8 initial lumens at 50,000 hour average LED life. See Lighting Facts label on page 2 for performance details. ELECTRICAL MVOLT driver operates on any line "liege from 120-277V Operating temperature d0°C to 40°C. IKVsurge protection standard. INSTALLATION Surface mounts to universal junction box (provided by others). LISTINGS UL Listed to U.S. and Canadian safety standards for wet locations. Tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79andLM-80 sgndaNs. _ WARRANTY - 5 -yea r li m iced warranty. (ompl etc warranty terms located at www.aaitvbrandxcom/CustomerResources/terms and conJUBns.aspx Actual performance may differ as result of end-userenvironment and application. Allvalues a,designr typicalvalues, measured under laboratory conditionsat 11 T Specifications Note: Specifications subject to change without notice. All dimensions are inches (centimeters) 3nne 3-f I/18 IgA1 IgA1 � film 4fiVt4 I11A1 (lim T T XT Forshortest lead times, configure products using bolded options. Example:OLLWD LED Jill 40K MVOLT DDB OLLWD LED N mlb 40K 120 DDB Series PerformancePackage Colortemperature(CCT) Voltage Type LPI OLLWDLED Downlight P1 40K 4000K MVOLT 12OV-277V DDB Darkbronze OLLWULED Up&downlight CONSTRUCTION 30827 2700K 120 120V' WH White xaa 1 Only available with OLLWU and in OD& DECORATIVE INDOOR & OUTDOOR OLLWD-OLLWU 0 L nmaiii A L/GHT/NG' N mlb L u m a r k r FMLL 30840 Width No. FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS 9 9" INTENDED USE Type LPI Provides an LED lighting platform to deliver general ambient lighting for surface -mount ceiling 30835 3500K applications. Light engine delivers long life and excellent color to ensure a quality, low -maintenance W P1 light installation. Decorative Indoor CONSTRUCTION 30827 2700K Metal parts are die formed from code -gauge steel. Diffuser is 100% textured durable white acrylic. a sealed and gasketed optical Continuous side flanges on fixture body provide light trap and continuous diffuser support to prevent LED Litepuff accidental opening and simplify maintenance. FFLED26N Finish: Five -stage Iron phosphate pretreatment assures superior paint adhesion and rust resistance. Crosstour Wall luminaire is ideal for wall/surface, inverted mount for Painted parts finished with high -gloss, high -reflectivity baked white polyester enamel (low V00. Linear Low Profile OPTICS Rectangular shaped LED floodlight designed to replace 70W Metal Halide. Patent Efficiency: 80 Thermal formed diffuser is of highly transmissive material to minimize lamp image and provides high- level pathway illumination including stairs. angle brightness control. One piece contemporary design wrap around diffuser soften appearance for angle Flus n �O�n� improved aesthetics. building entrances, multi -use facilities, apartment buildings, institutions, ELECTRICAL P1 Lang -life LEDs, coupled with a high -efficiency driver, provide extended service life. Standard input= 35 LINEAR LED watts, 88 lumens per watt. FMLL is rated to deliver L70 performance at 50,000 hours. Fixture operatesat volts, 6014z.LISTIN _ LISTINGS Construction CSA certified to US and Canadian standards. Listed for damp locations. ENERGY STAR' certified. electrical wiring compartment. WARRANTY Slim, low -profile LED design 5 -year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at Integral LED electronic driver www.acuitybmnds.com/CustomerResources/Terms and conditions.asox with rugged one-piece, die-cast NOTE: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. incorporates surge protection. 120 - All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at25°C. aluminum hinged removable door Specifications subject to change without notice. 277V 50/6OHz or 347V 6OHz models. Specifications Width: 9-1/4 (23.5) Length: 47-7/8 (121.7) Depth: 3-1/4 (8.3) Weight: 7,18 HIS All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless otherwise indirated. Forshonestlead times, configure products using bolded options. Example: FMLL 9 30840 Replacement parts P DFMLL9 1'x 4'whitescrylici iffuser Notes 1 Use with non -dimmable switches only. DECORATIVE INDOOR FMLL DESCRIPTION Project: L u m a r k Series' Width CRUColortemperiture FMLL 9 9" 30840 4000K XTOR1 B-120 Driver Info 30835 3500K COMMENTS W P1 30830 3000K construction, universal back Color Temp: 5000K 30827 2700K Replacement parts P DFMLL9 1'x 4'whitescrylici iffuser Notes 1 Use with non -dimmable switches only. DECORATIVE INDOOR FMLL DESCRIPTION Project: L u m a r k Y Q GR1 I t The patented Lumark Crosstour- LED Wall Pack Series of luminaries XTOR1 B-120 Driver Info provides an architectural style with super bright, energy efficient LEDs. COMMENTS W P1 The low -profile, rugged die-cast aluminum construction, universal back Color Temp: 5000K LLJ box, stainless steel hardware along with a sealed and gasketed optical COMMUNITY BLDG. PORCH AND MAILBOX HUT 24OV: 0.13A compartment make the Crosstour impervious to contaminants. The FFLED26N 277V: 0.11A Crosstour Wall luminaire is ideal for wall/surface, inverted mount for 120 Input Watts: 23W fagade/canopy illumination, post/bollard, site lighting, floodlight and low Rectangular shaped LED floodlight designed to replace 70W Metal Halide. Patent Efficiency: 80 LITHONIA level pathway illumination including stairs. Typical applications include facade lighting, sign lighting, LED landscape lighting and instant -cm security lighting. , building entrances, multi -use facilities, apartment buildings, institutions, Weight: 4.8166 P1 schools, stairways and loading docks test. LED Listings SPECIFICATION FEATURES Optical UL Listing: Construction Optical electrical wiring compartment. Ambient Temperature: Slim, low -profile LED design Silicone sealed optical LED Integral LED electronic driver Electrical with rugged one-piece, die-cast chamber incorporates a custom incorporates surge protection. 120 - This product is on the Design Lights Consortium (DLC) aluminum hinged removable door engineered mirrored anodized 277V 50/6OHz or 347V 6OHz models. a and back box. Matching housing reflector providing high -efficiency Thermal Management Housing: Surge Protection: styles incorporate both a small illumination. Optical assembly Finish RAS LED luminaires have been tested by an and medium design. The small includes impact -resistant Crosstour is protected with a Mounting: housing is available in 12W, 18W tempered glass and meets IESNA Super durable TGIC carbon See FFLED18/PC. FFLEDI8/PCS, FFLEDI8/PC2 or and 26W. The medium housing 9 requirements for full cutoff bronze or summit white polyester ■■Ir/ is available in the 38W model. compliance, Available in seven P owner coat aint. Super durable P P / Patented secure lock hinge feature allows for safe and easy tool -less lumen packages; 5000K, 4000K and 3000K CCT. n TGIC powder coat paint finishes withstand extreme climate _ electrical connections with the CJS conditions while providing optimal LEDs: supplied push -in connectors. Back Electrical color and gloss retention ofthe Finish: box includes three half-inch, NPT LED driver is mounted to the installed life. XTOR threaded conduitentry points. The die-cast housing for optimal heat Patents: CROSSTOUR LED universal back box supports both sinking. LED thermal management Warranty Polyester owner coat finish formulated without the y P use of VOC or toxic heavy metals. the small and medium forms and system incorporates both Five-year warranty. American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) mounts to standard 3-1/2" to 4" conduction and natural convection For use on Mobile Offshore Drilling Units (MODU) and Color Uniformity: round and octagonal, 4" square, to transfer heat rapidly away from RAB's range of CCT (Correlated Color Temperature) single gang and masonry junction the LED source. 12W, 18W, 26W APPLICATIONS: boxes. Ke hole gasket allows Y 9 and 38W series operate in -40"C to P E uivalent to 70W Metal Halide. Eq WALL /SURFACE for adaptation to junction box or 40•C [-40•F to 104 -Fl. High ambient P Rating: I9 POST / BOLLARD we,External fin design extracts 506C models available. Crosstour LOW LEVEL heat from the fixture surface. One. luminaires maintain greater than FLOODLIGHT piece silicone gasket seals door 89% of initial light output after INVERTED and back box. Minimum 5" wide 72,000 hours of operation. Three SITE LIGHTING pole for site lighting application. half-inch NPT threaded conduit Not recommended for car wash entry points allow for thru-branch applications. wiring. Back box is an authorized DIMENSIONS ESCUTCHEON PLATES uw,1IIN, 2M 6-374' 1171mm1 38W e" 1203mm1 ,p• 125amml Eii O#0 — J I I L 17-1/2" 1445mm] L—,2,18W,26wJ L,2w.,ew.nw w 5 -3/4"1146"'n) 3-5/8" 92mm 3[1W 38W 6-5B" 1168mm1 4" n02mml ]-1n" o e N rnm] X10^1254mm1� EARN F=wenng&rsmess WarldwiAe—di,signlights.mg ran CERTIFICATION DATA UU,UL Wet Location Listed LM79/UMBO ComP lion ROHS ComP liant ADA Compliers[ NOM Compliant Models IP661ngm,sed Protection Rated Tide 24 Cam nam P DasignLiehts Consortium00 Qualified• TECHNICAL DATA 40°C Maximum Ambient TamP erature External SuPPY 1 Wiring 90°C Minimum EPA Effattive Projected Arae (Sq. Ft.): XTORIB,XTOR2B,XTOMB=0.34 XTOR4B=0.45 SHIPPING DATA: Approzimate Net Weight: 3.7 -5.25 ths. 11.7 -2.4 kgs.] TD514013EN 2017.07.2512:21:59 BE21 21" Era' Bell PicoEmitterO LED IaM LIGH71NG k1-bel7eled-spec.pdf JOB TYPE P1 NOTES APPROVALS FEATURES Certifications • PicoEmittere'technology, in 0 -COV dimmingdrivers standard 11 • Available in 580nm 3000K, 4000K and 5000K • IP66 certified 0 aL BB standard CCT IIBIEB • Type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, R, L standard distributions s9oassivem r-ce" SPECIFICATIONS 195 090 5 msm m) Approx. Weight = 46 Its. EPA 0.8 for 1A. I 21 See Configuration for Additional EPAs. (533.4—) ORDERING CODE 1A BE21 4 E35 120E 5K UV DBi to 1 Arm Side W. 0.8 Egig" Distribution Drive Current Source ColorTemcersturee Vooes ltaBL Black A30 120V Button Photocell 2B 2 Arm Side Mt. 1.6 BE21 1 Type I E35 350mA PicoEmitter 120L 120 LEDs 2K 580nma UV 120 277V DB Dark Bronze A31 208V Button Photocell •j" 3Y' 3 Arm Side M1. 2.d 2 Type H 3K 3000K GT Graphite A32 240V Button Photocell ' 4K 4Nm Side Mt. Z.8 3 Type III 4K 4000K 347 347VLG Light Gray A33 27N Button Phaorell 4 Type lV 48048OV' N 1 W SirgleWall Mt Na SK SOOOK PS Platinum Silver A34 480V Button Photocell 5 TypeV TT iunium A35 347V Button Photocell •Aaaearwa4vawawFM6krMreaax R Type R. Right Will White L Type 4 Leh CC Custom Cola' •Cms sRepe m— SF 120, 277, 347 UneVolb LS Polycallonate NFONeighbor Riendly W'reless Pole Arm PoleTenan Mount Wall Mount WI OF 208, 240.480 One vote Lensss Opli4 photometry WIR-RMI-IO I20d47V, 1000'range, Wikape HA01L HA01L-TMI Postlop(rick available for Type RF mesh control system with HA02L HA02L-TMT, HA02L-TM2, HAOZL-W Side Pole Crook III/MALI others, off'o"'dim, motion. photo, HA02L-TM3, HA02L-7M4 consult lattary GPS locatron, alert,moles, ng HA03L HA03L-TM1, HA03L-TM2, Post Top Swept Cast Arm and metering apabilities. HA03L-TM3, HA03L-TM4 Mo10 HAUL HA11L-TMI, HAUL-TM2, HAUL.W Side Pole 5wept Cast Arm SCL•R Round Pole Mounted HAUL-TM3, HAI 1 L-TM4 0[a n Sensor to 6 Side Pole S -Sha U Da ry up HA1ZL NA72L-TML HAl2L-TM4 HA72L-W Ped p SCL-S Sq.. care Pole Mounted NA121•TM3 HAl2L-TM4 Cast Arm HAArm Ocapamy Sensor nprol6' HA14L HA14-TM1, HA14L-TM2, HA14L•W Side Pole Neo-Clasi[Am, SCH•R Round Pole Mounted HA74L-TM3, NA14L-TM4 Occupancy Sensor l6'to 30' HA31L HA31L-TMI, HA31L-TM2, HA31L-W Side Pole Arm w/ro PScroll SCH-S Sgmre Pok Manned NA31L-TM3, HA31 L-TM4 Oeupanry Smsar l6'ro30' HA33L HA33L-TM1, HA33L-TM2, HA33L.W Side Pole Ribbon An HA33L-TM3, HA33L-TM4 wrtop Gussm HA35L HA35L-TM1 HA35L-VV Side Pole Ribbon Arm vi/lop Brace HA37L HA37L-TM1 HA37L-W Side PoleRih6onwrtap Br Bottum Stoll Fe Pole m5elect:h UAvwwkimi htin .<o roducWarms and lest are k ttp 9 cl •lo _ Jao Fa Control Spec Selett:httplltryssLcoMMex.html HA38L HA38L-TMT HA38L-W Side Pokluster rtop Bnce, Bottom Gusset ' US Patent No. D674965 S. Other patents pending. s 35OmA only. D P 5 V ' Fe custom tics and color immature confi ura0o amatt factory. ' Use on when vandalism iz amici ted to be hi h. R aired cunt for cup Pel a,IY eq 9Pa 9 Y Kim Lighting reserves the right to s Turtle friendly. vandal protettion in locauons where fixture s can be reached by change specifications without notice. '347V& 480V currents may be supplied with step-down tmnformer. unauthonzed Denons. O 2017 KIM LIGHTING 1 17760 Rowland Street I City of Industry I CA 91748 --- ® HUBBELL 1 1 I P 626.968.5666 I F 626.369.2695 1 wwwAimlighting.com I Rev. May 16 2017 -- ugrating 0LWX1 LED OLWXI-LED-2OW-4OK-DDB LED Wall Luminaire r giglitz wrz Mpmt, facts r Introduction 4.63 As versatile as it is efficient, the OLWX1 is designed Specifications to replace up to 25OW metal halide while saving over 87% in energy costs. It combines multiple Width: 7-1/2" mounting options with the latest generation of nixed 8 O + LEDs for a wall pack luminaire that converts to a e" O Height: m mJ whole lot more. Whether you are mounting it to a Depth: 3recessed junction box, conduit/through wiring, as pA cockO Weight: S lbs Wei an up light, as a down light, or as a flood light — the 9 ru7y1 7-ln 3 L9g41 OLWX1 has you covered. Flush or backbox mount • EXAMPLE: OLWX1 LED 20W 50K OLWKI LED 0IVV%1 IED 13W 13 watts 40K 40WK(blank) MVOLT7 (blank) None (blank) Darkbronze 20W 20 warts 50K 5000K 120 12M PE 120V button photocell" 40W 40wans 347 347V NOTES Accessories 1Noa lablew h34N option. aenwadsNwuwa"i 2 MVWTdiver opera"sonanylinevohagefrom120-27N(SW60Hz1. CC.T.Slipfitter-sliel 3 SpecifylXNwl.n.,dm,gwithphotocell(PEoOon). DO IYK Yoke -,bel OLWKITHK Knuckle-sael `cATURES &SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The versanlilyof the OLWXI LED combines a leek, Iowlarofile wall pack design and high -o~ LEDs to ride an enc effcient lowmainterence LEDwall ack suitable for re to 2.`AVJ Pd rgy P Pia EDinip mmol halide[ Nraz. Available fleod light mpvmin accessores convert the OLWX1 LED intoes h -h '9 9 '9 h e(fident Bond light 9h OLWXI LED is ideal for anchor apPhosua,s wch sebuild.ng Perimeters, boding areas, driveways curd sign and bu ildirg flood lighting. CONSTRUCTION Rugged cert -aluminum housing with te-md dark bronze Polyester powder paint for lazting durability. Integral heat shies optimize thermal management through conductive and cenveaiva Doling. LEDs are pros— behind a 91—lens. Housing is sealed against moisture and enwmnmental contaminants RPM). OPTICS Hi h- douance LEDs behind clear lass fo maximum li ht u ut. Li ht en in wadable g pe g g tP g g azarea in 4000K and SOOOK CCT. See Lighting Facts label and photometry repor4 far specific fi—, pieformance. Essily ATMON Easiy moon s ro recessedjuncnan boxeswith the includedwall mount backer, or for surface andcond.itant -with theincluded'unot,nboxwithfi-1/2"th,.ded,.nd.it entry hubb,. Flood light en -ming accessories (sold separately) include knuckle, integral sli finer and oke mountin o ons. Each flood mount accesso c with aro v P Y 9 Pti ry o P iso vandal curd. Wminaire be wall or round mounted in downward or u curd orientation gu may 9 Pw LISTINGS UL Listed to U.5. and Canadiaafesta Canadian safety standards wet locations. for locations. Rated mum for -0 C mini ambient. Tested in accordance with IESNA LM -79 and LM -80 standards. D..ig,Ughts Consortium® (DLC) qualified Product. Not all ve,zienz of this product may be DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List e - confirm which versmns are ,,aped. WARRANTY Sear limited warrant. Comle,e wartanty rms —Ind a,. y y P to I Note: Aaual edormance maYdiffer asaresuIt of end-user environment anda l—i— All values are design or typicalvalues, meawred under laboratory condition— 25°C. Specifications wbiea w change without notice. ELECTRICAL Light engine consists oI 1 high -efficiency Chip On Board (COB) LED with integrated circuit board =red directly to the housing to maximize hsipon a eat disatind promN promote long life 3/100,000 h urs at urge racing. Food light m oming aa azPoonweesr ifnacclud—n1%dadrditiTHeDl62kV0sxuagned a minimum 2.5kV protection device. One LithoniaW • Co ern, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • nwwl�,hor, accts '. L/THON/A 4r s m L/GHT/NG 02m32(117 Acuity Brands Ughting, Inc. All rights reserved. BE21 21" Eras Bell PicoEmitter' LED IoM LIGHTNG kl_bel7eled-spec.pdf JOB TYPE P2 NOTES APPROVALS FEATURES Certifications • PicoEmitter•technolo ' ■ - 0 COV dimming drivers standard 9Y g • Available in 580nm 3000K, 4000K and 5000K • IP66 certified r O stanch d CCT IISiEB • Type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, R, L standard distributions 3earmwemmacm,°^, SPECIFICATIONS 195/tB" (490.5 mm) Approx. Weight= IS lbs. EPA 0.8 for 1A. 21"� See Configuration for Additional EPAs. (533A mm) ORDERING CODE 1A BE21 2 E35 120E 5K UV DB i 777 e MI. 0.8 fixture D sbibutlon on" Current 5931TCt Color Temomature7 Voted BL Black A30 120V Button Photocell e Mt. 1.6 BE21 1 Type I E35 350mA PicoEmitter 120L 120 LEDs 2K 580nm1 UV /20.277V DS Dark Bronze A31 208V Button Photocell e W. 2.4 2 Type II 3K 3000K GT Graphite A32 240V Button Photocell 347347v'e MI. 2.8 3 type III 4K4000K LG Light Grayp33 277V Button Photocell 4804BOV'SK SOOOK PS Platinum Silverll MI Na 4 Type IV A34 48W Button Photocell S Typev IT ionium A35 347V Burson Photocell •Are'udemm Wlaa6renabnzaww WH White R Type R, Right CC Custom Color* L Typel. Left •cersuxem,esmobse SF 120,277,347UmVolb IS Polycarbonate NFONeighbor Riendly Wireless Pole I Pole tenon Mount Wall M &19 OF 206, 240, 480 UneVONs Lenss" Optic photometry WIRAMHO 120.347V, 1000'range,W6cape HA01L HA01L-TMI Post Top Crook available for Type RF mesh control system with HA02L HA02L-TMI, HA02L-TM2, HA02L-W Side Pole Crook IIIIIVAll others, ori/oNdim, motion, photo, Hp021-TM3, HA02L-TM4 consult factory GPS location, alert,moeg HA03L HA03L-TM1, HAO3L-TM2, Position Swept Cast Arm d metering capabilities. s. HA03L-TM3, HA034TM4 MOCon • 1 1 - 1 - Side Pole Swe tCanArm HA71L HAIILTM HA7 LTM2 HA7 LW P SCL R Raabe Pole Mounted HA11L-TM3 NA71L-TM4 0[a n Senses to 16' pa W Side Pole S-shapedU ry HA72L HA72L-TMT NA72L-TM2 HA72L-W P SCl-S care Pole Moumed HA72L-TM.i HA724TM4 CastA m Sq NA Arm Occupancy Sense up to 76' HA14L NAt4L•TM7, HA74L-TM2, HA74L-W Side Pole Neo-classic Arm SCH-R Routs Pole Mounted 114741.4143, HA74L-TM4 Occupancy Sensor 16'to 30' NA31L HA31L-TMI, HA31 L-TM2, HA31L.W Side Pole Arm w/Top Scroll SCH-5 Sq.. Pole Mourned HA31L-TM3,HA31L-TM4 Occupancy Sense 16'to 30' HA33L HA33L-TMI, HA33L-TM2, HA33L-W Side Pole Ribbon Amt HA33L-TM3, HA33L-TM4 wrtap Gusset HA35L HA35L-TM1 HA35L-W Side Pole Ribbon Alm wrrcp Brace HA37L HA37L-TM1 HA37L-W Side Pole Ribbon wrlops Brac Bottom Scroll e For Pole SpecSelect:http:/Mww.kimlighNng.coMproductslarms andyolesl For Control Spm Select hnpJhryssi.comrmlex.html HA38L HA38L-TMT HA38L-W Side Pok Rbhonwnop Brace, Bottom Guam ' US Patent No. D674.965 S Otheratents pending. s 350mA only. P PQ . 9 Y 7 For custom optics and color tem arore confi uratlon contatt factory. ' Use onl when vandalism is amici aced to be hi h. Re aired on for x ptros Pm 9 ry Y P 9 q Y vandal razed pers in locations where Nxtures can be reached b Kim Lighting reserves the right to s Turtle Mendly. P Y change specifications without notice. ' 34N & 480V currents may be supplied with step-down tranformer. unauthorized persons. 0 2017 KIM LIGHTING 1 17760 Rowland Street I City of Industry I CA 91748 — - r °' HUBBELL 1 1 P 626.968.5666 I F 626.369.2695 1 www.kimlighting.com I Rev. May 16 2017 ---- Lighting FFLED18 Need help? Tech help line: (888) RAE -1000 Email: sales@rabweb.com Website: www,rabweb.com Copyright © 2014 RAS Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice Pagel of 2 r ------ I L ------ 4#5 VERTICAL REINFORCING - BAR EVENLY SPACED AROUND PERIMETER #4 REINFORCING AT 6" O.C. —� HORIZONTAL FINISHED GRADE — I—I — BASE OF 4500 PSI CONCRETE. EXPOSED PORTIONS TO HAVE SACK FINISH. FLUSH HANDHOLE AND COVER ASE COVER IASE PLATE " NONSHRINK GROUT "CHAMFER AROUND EDGE Project: Type: Y Q GR1 I t Prepared By: Date: LAMPS Driver Info LED Info COMMENTS Type: Cornets tCurren Watts: 18W WELD OR COMPRESSION FITTING 120V: 0.2A Color Temp: 5000K LLJ 208V: 0.15A Color Accuracy: 72 CRI COMMUNITY BLDG. PORCH AND MAILBOX HUT 24OV: 0.13A L70 Lifespan: 100000 FFLED26N 277V: 0.11A Lumens: 2310 120 Input Watts: 23W Efficacy: 103 LPW Rectangular shaped LED floodlight designed to replace 70W Metal Halide. Patent Efficiency: 80 LITHONIA Pending airflow technology ensures long LED and driver Irfespan. Use for building LED facade lighting, sign lighting, LED landscape lighting and instant -cm security lighting. , Color: Bronze Weight: 4.8166 P1 Technical Specifications 1A-BE21-4-E35-120L-5K-UV-DB LED Listings Airnow: Optical UL Listing: Airflow technology, heat sink for superior cooling. NEMA Type: Suilatole For Wet Locations.Suilableforground Ambient Temperature: NEMA Beam Spread of 7H x 6V mounting. 9 Suitable for use in 104° F (40° C) ambient Electrical DLC Listed: temperatures. Driver: This product is on the Design Lights Consortium (DLC) Cold Weather Starting: Constant Current Class 2, 100 - 27N, 50 - 60 Hz, 100 Qualified Products List and is eligible for rebates from DLC Member Utilities. Minimum starting temperature is -00° F (-40° C) - 27NAC 0.4 Amps. DLC Product Code: P0000170B Thermal Management Housing: Surge Protection: IESNA LM -79 & LM -80 Testing: Die-cast aluminum housing, lens frame and mounting 6kV RAS LED luminaires have been tested by an arm. Other independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM- Mounting: California Title 24: 79 and LM -80, and have received the Department of Energy "Lightng Facts" label. Heavy-duty mounting am with "O^ ring seal & See FFLED18/PC. FFLEDI8/PCS, FFLEDI8/PC2 or LED Characteristics stainless steel screw. FFLEDI8/PCS2 for a 2013 California Tfie 24 LED Reflector: compliant model. Lifespan: Semi -specular anodized aluminum. Warranty: 100,000 -hour LED rdespan based on IES LM -80 Gaskets: RAB warants that our LED oducts will be free from Pr results and TM -21 calculations. CJS defects in materials and workmanship for a period of LEDs: High-temperature silicone gaskets five (5) years from the dale of delivery to the end user, Mullichip, high -output. long -life LEDs Finish: including coverage of light output, color stability, driver Color Consistency: Formulated for high -durability and long lasting color. performance and fixture finish. 7 -step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent Green Technology: Patents: fixture -to -fixture color. Mercuryand UV het. ROHS com lion[ components. P Pe The FFLED design is protected b U.S. Pal. 0643 147 9 P Y Color Stability: Polyester owner coat finish formulated without the y P use of VOC or toxic heavy metals. Canada Pat. 67 798 China pending patent in Taiwan. 1 Mexico Pat. 36757 and pending patent in Taiwan. LED color temperature is warantied to shift no more U American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) than 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. //--�� L.L For use on Mobile Offshore Drilling Units (MODU) and Color Uniformity: shipping vessels. RAB's range of CCT (Correlated Color Temperature) Equivalency: followsthe guidelines of the American National Standard for SSL Products ANSI C78.377-2015. E uivalent to 70W Metal Halide. Eq Construction P Rating: I9 In ress Protection ratio of IP66 for dust and water 9 Need help? Tech help line: (888) RAE -1000 Email: sales@rabweb.com Website: www,rabweb.com Copyright © 2014 RAS Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice Pagel of 2 r ------ I L ------ 4#5 VERTICAL REINFORCING - BAR EVENLY SPACED AROUND PERIMETER #4 REINFORCING AT 6" O.C. —� HORIZONTAL FINISHED GRADE — I—I — BASE OF 4500 PSI CONCRETE. EXPOSED PORTIONS TO HAVE SACK FINISH. FLUSH HANDHOLE AND COVER ASE COVER IASE PLATE " NONSHRINK GROUT "CHAMFER AROUND EDGE —24" MIN. —I POLE BASE DETAIL GENERAL NOTES: 1. WHERE CONCRETE SLAB OR PAVING IS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH POLE BASE, THE BASE IS CONSTRAINED AND THE FOOTING EMBED MAY BE REDUCED AS NOTED. 2. COORDINATE STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. POLE BASE DETAIL KEYED NOTES: 1. PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL LOCKNUTS AND LOCKWASHERS. 2. PROVIDE ANCHOR BOLTS TO MATCH PATTERN AS PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER. 3. STUB 3/4"C-6" ABOVE POLE BASE. 1 POLE BASE DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. EXTERIOR LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE - RohnertPark Apts. Q U EXPOSED CONCRETE TO HAVE Y Q SACK FINISH. I t MANUFACTURER #4 BARE COPPER BOND FROM N LAMPS WATTS VOLTS BOLT TO REBAR WITH EXOTHERMIC COMMENTS A WELD OR COMPRESSION FITTING Q LED LLJ 120 RECESSED COMMUNITY BLDG. PORCH AND MAILBOX HUT — A RAB FFLED26N LED N Cn Z Z 1 O 1 � U 120 WALL MONUMENT SIGN LIGHT ILL - CV v n Z LITHONIA FMLL 30840 LED 3" MIN. 0- 120 FLUSH —24" MIN. —I POLE BASE DETAIL GENERAL NOTES: 1. WHERE CONCRETE SLAB OR PAVING IS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH POLE BASE, THE BASE IS CONSTRAINED AND THE FOOTING EMBED MAY BE REDUCED AS NOTED. 2. COORDINATE STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. POLE BASE DETAIL KEYED NOTES: 1. PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL LOCKNUTS AND LOCKWASHERS. 2. PROVIDE ANCHOR BOLTS TO MATCH PATTERN AS PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER. 3. STUB 3/4"C-6" ABOVE POLE BASE. 1 POLE BASE DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. EXTERIOR LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE - RohnertPark Apts. Q U Z Y Q 0 LUMINAIRE MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER LAMPS WATTS VOLTS MOUNTING COMMENTS A LITHONIA LDN6-30/10-LO6AR-LD LED 13 120 RECESSED COMMUNITY BLDG. PORCH AND MAILBOX HUT GR1 RAB FFLED26N LED 26 120 WALL MONUMENT SIGN LIGHT LP1 LITHONIA FMLL 30840 LED 36 120 FLUSH GARBAGE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES P1 KIM LIGHTING 1A-BE21-4-E35-120L-5K-UV-DB LED 128 120 DETAIL 1 /E1.02 SITE POLE LIGHTING P2 KIM LIGHTING 1A-BE21-2-E35-120L-5K-UV-DB LED 128 120 DETAIL 1 /E1.02 SITE POLE LIGHTING P3 KIM LIGHTING 2B-BE21-4-E35-12OL-5K W -DB (2)LED 256 120 DETAIL 1 /E1.02 SITE POLE LIGHTING WP1 LUMARK CROSSTOUR XT0R1 B-120Lm 12 120 WALL WALL PACKS WP2 LITHONIA OLWX1 LED 20W 40K LED 22 120 WALL BREEZEWAY LIGHTING WS1 LITHONIA OLLWD P1 40K 120 DDB LED 10 120 WALL BUILDING ENTRY COLUMNS ENGINEER ING 440 East Corporate Dr., Ste. 103 Meridian ID 83642 ph 208-288-2181 fax 208-288-2182 project REVISIONS F80/'YR0311IGHT DATE 7 JJF PWH 17-2 UJ I— H I`` UUSOWCOOS 2 f n H W LM C D U U m LL 2 LL w C C xaaxal RVB = C� 1= O ¢ F - 'nn,, z W I— w LU m l i r a O llueuxA F-¢ O H xa>, ¢C7UZO Z0�o LL W J — Q g U U r � trrr� CL ` a a U O W l ] r/ • VT ISO Z z Z ¢ i Z��p F(n C7 m W V/�b/ Z � 0 C/) Rr fe ¢w�0U3¢J¢ HLL W LLCnQ� 00 EUz or, CS}N¢ WO �Z Q Z D C O¢ W Z y- U O 2 O Z d2 J Z LL U t U w O Ir d Q U Z Y Q 0 ~z 2 O 0 W I— O 0 O_ I� Q LU � m U) p O cc 0 W cc > 0 zU— H ooF- � Z Z Q O U) U Q px3: U W , Q Q z w F_ ^+ CD Ll Q a a U^, U W a Z Q W �--r Z O O o z Q I- iC—) LU ¢ =p u<= ¢ ME I — (n (Yrs O CJS I- LU (.0 J Z C/3 Al w � U) LU� O00 O U QNCD �4-->coQoo� _ 00 U W J � N DO " //--�� L.L � LLI N .Cz U w O Ir d El .02 Q U Y Q F_ M W Z ~z 2 O U U) I— ,/ / O_ I� LU I— m U) Q cc 0 W cc > 0 zU— H f2 El .02 ,huf4rvtM! � qf, C.I 1.I PUKKA City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission Report DATE: February 8, 2018 ITEM NO: 8.4 AGENDA TITLE: PROJ17-0002 UDSP Bristol Development Area Plan REQUEST: Consideration of a Development Area Plan and Tentative Subdivision Map for development of a 6.2 acre property, creating 42 new housing units plus a 9814 square foot water quality detention parcel (APNS 045-235- 009,010,011,012) 45-235- 009,010,011,012) LOCATION: University District Specific Plan GP / ZONING: University District Specific Plan APPLICANT: Signature Homes RECOMMENDATION A public hearing notice was published for this project for February 8, 2018. Additional time is needed to finalize project Conditions of Approval, prior to Planning Commission consideration. Staff recommends that the public hearing be continued to a date certain of February 22, 2018. A,1PPROVALS: \IJ V� r� �M �✓. �w Jeffrey Beiswenger, PlanningmanagerL Page 1 Date