Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2018/07/12 Planning Commission Agenda Packet
City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission AGENDA Thursday, July 12, 2018 6:00 P.M. 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park To Any Member of Me Audience Desiring to Address lite Planning Commission: For public comment on items listed or not listed on the agenda, or on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time, you may do so upon recognition from the Chairperson. PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL (Adams Blanquie Borba Giudice�Haydon__) 4. DECLARATION OF ABSTENTION 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF POSTING OF AGENDA — Agenda has been posted in three public places: Community Center, Public Safety Building and City Hall. 6. PUBLIC COMMENT - Persons who wish to speak to the Commission regarding an item that is not on the agenda may do so at this time. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR - ADOPTION OF MINUTES 7.1 Approval of the Draft Minutes of the Special Planning Commission meeting of March 29, 2018 8. AGENDA ITEMS 8.1 STUDY SESSION - Presentation on the Station Avenue Project 8.2 PUBLIC HEARING (CONTINUED FROM THE JUNE 28, 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) — MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS - File No. PLMC18-0002 — City of Rohnert Park— Consideration of Resolution No. 2018-12 recommending to the City Council Municipal Code amendments to Title 17 of the City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code, Section 17.07.020 (N) Inclusionary Housing CEQA: No California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis is required for this ordinance. The proposed ordinance is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3), as adoption will not have an impact on the environment, and 15378(b)(4), which says that the creation of government funding mechanisms that do not involve a commitment to a particular project do not fall under the auspices of CEQA. 9. ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10. ITEMS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE STAFF 11. ADJOURNMENT Appeals of any decisions made tonight must be received by the Planning Division within 10 days and no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 23, 2018 NOTE: If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearing(s) described in this Agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Rohnert Park at, or prior to the public hearing(s). Disabled Accommodation: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting please call (707) 588-2236. Notification 72 hours in advance of the meeting will enable the city to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.35.104 AD Title III) CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA I, Kelsey Bracewell, Development Services Office Assistant for the City of Rohnert Park, declare that the foregoing notice and agenda for the July 12, 2018, Planning Commission Meeting of the City of Rohnert Park was posted and available for review on July 6, 2018, at Rohnert Park City Hall, 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California 94928. The agenda is available on the City of Rohnert Park's web site at wiv►va, city.org. Signed this 6th day of July, 2018 at Rohnert Park, California. City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission Report DATE: July 12, 2018 ITEM NO: 8.1 AGENDA TITLE: Study Session: Presentation on the Station Avenue Project LOCATION: 6400 State Farm Drive GP / ZONING: Mixed Use / Station Center Planned Development APPLICANT: David Bouquillon, Laulima Development RECOMMENDATION Receive presentation on the Station Avenue (Rohnert Station) project and provide feedback to applicant and staff. Laulima Development has applied for Final Development Plan approval as well as a tentative map for the former State Farm Campus and the City's Corporation Yard. The plan contemplates an urban, mixed-use project spread across 30 acres that would include a central square, 460 residential units, 130,000 square feet of retail, 120,000 square feet of office, and a 156 room hotel. BACKGROUND In early 2016, the City adopted its Central Rohnert Park Priority Development Area Plan (PDA Plan). At approximately the same time, the Planning Commission and City Council approved the Preliminary Development Plan for the Rohnert Crossings project proposed by SunCal for the former State Farm property. That plan called for 400 dwelling units with approximately 100,000 square feet of office and retail. In 2017, the City learned that SunCal had placed the property on the market. It was then purchased by Laulima Development in late 2017. Laulima has applied for a Final Development Plan and a tentative map for their project, Rohnert Station (although the name has recently changed to "Station Avenue"). The project description currently calls for 460 residential units, 130,000 square feet of retail, 120,000 square feet of office, and a 156 room hotel, all developed around a central plaza. Table 1 provides a Page 1 comparison of the approved PDA Plan uses and the Laulima proposal. Attachment 1 provides a comparative illustration of the "Station Center site" included in the PDA Plan and Laulima's proposed site plan. While the number of dwelling units and commercial square footages are higher, the proposal is generally consistent with the PDA Plan. The Final Development Plan process is intended to shape more of the details of the proposed project. The overall PDA Plan has sufficient land use capacity to accommodate the additional units and commercial area. The proposal also generally reflects concepts that were surfaced in Downtown Design Charrette held late in 2017 and the applicant is proposing to incorporate a Form -Based Code within its approvals. Table 1: Comparative Land Uses PDA Plan — Station Center Subarea Proposed Station Avenue Project 415 residential units (more were studied) 172,000 sqft of retail and service 65,000 sqft of office 460 residential units 130,000 sqft of retail plus 156 room hotel 120,000 sqft of office Downtown Charrette and Form -Based Code A multi -day downtown charrette was held November 6-9 in 2017 to focus on design concepts that could be included in a Form -Based Code (FBC) for the City's downtown area. As the Commission will recall, a FBC differs from a standard zoning code in that urban design elements (street locations and widths, sidewalk locations and widths, building setbacks etc.) are included in the code so that the City has more certainty about the final look of a development. The City has an FBC in place for the Sonoma Mountain Village Planned Development so the Downtown FBC would be the second FBC approved in the City. The project applicant participated in the downtown charrette, which had an important and positive influence on the project's design. The project's street grid, provision of parks and open space, and design of State Farm Drive and Rohnert Park Expressway are consistent with the plans developed during the charrette. One particularly significant new idea that was generated during the charrette was the slip -street concept. The applicant has incorporated the slip -street into the project design to provide a way for the project to positively interface in a more urban manner with Rohnert Park Expressway. To implement the conceptual design framework from the charrette, Staff is working with the applicant and our consultant Opticos to finalize a draft FBC overlay that will regulate the form and architecture of this project and which can be used to guide future redevelopment projects in the Downtown District Amenity Zone (DDAZ). FBCs are an important tool for establishing and maintaining neighborhoods with a strong sense of place. The FBC overlay would apply to the entire DDAZ, and as part of the process, the borders of the DDAZ will be adjusted so that the entire Station Avenue project site is included (see Attachment 2). The FBC will insure that over time as the rest of the downtown area develops, it will occur in an urban manner that is consistent with City's vision and compliments the Station Avenue project. Project Design Downtowns are a very specific development form that incentivizes walking, unique relationships between buildings, parking, and transit, specific relationships between buildings and the street, Page 2 complementary relationships between individual buildings, and defined public spaces with strong landscape and architectural elements. All of these elements combine to create a "sense of place" in a downtown. The current designs for the Station Avenue project are urban in nature and borrow from a variety of architectural traditions. The designs rely on high-quality materials, functional architecture, well -thought out landscape designs and place -making strategies, connections to parking and transit, and active programming of civic and community events around a central square to create a vibrant destination downtown. The proposed architecture incorporates variations in building heights and materials while maintaining a common architectural language. The planned buildings will echo traditional downtown development patterns while making them unique for Rohnert Park. Customized storefronts should create visual interest at the ground level for pedestrians. Contemporary construction methods and finishes on upper floors have the potential to insure a unified look for the development while also being cost-effective for the developer. Overall, the architectural style is best described as `urban contemporary'. The modern, urban architecture is being driven to a large degree by feedback from potential tenants, as well as the developer's own preferences. The City Council previewed the current architectural designs at its June 26, 2018 meeting. Program The applicant believes that bringing together a variety of uses in a high-quality urban environment is key for the success of this development. The latest trend in retail is "experiential," meaning the sense of place and the experience one has while in the environment are as important as what is being sold or marketed. The combination of a hotel, office, restaurant, retail, transit, and residential uses will create a critical mass for a vibrant downtown destination. The office uses will complement the residential and retail components of the project by allowing residents to live, work, and play onsite. The office population will also provide additional shoppers and diners during weekdays. The applicant is planning for a brewery to be located along the State Farm Drive frontage of the project, adjacent to the hotel, main parking garage, and retail core. Small breweries have increasingly become a common sight within downtowns and can be a draw for local residents and tourists alike. Station Square, planned in front of the large `station building,' is envisioned as a community hub with active programming like farmer's markets, festivals, and concerts. A neighborhood park is planned at the southern edge of the development along Enterprise Drive. Circulation The proposed design relies on three key circulation elements for success: 1) The existing road network around the project including Rohnert Park Expressway, State Farm Drive, and Enterprise Drive. Pending final results of the traffic study, improvements to all three of these streets are contemplated in conjunction with the project. Most notably is the addition of a slip -street with on -street parking along the Rohnert Park Expressway frontage, and the narrowing of State Farm Drive to two lanes with on -street parking in accordance with the PDA Plan. 2) The Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) station and pathway on the eastern frontage of the project. The project seeks to take advantage of the ability for residents, workers, and visitors to use this transit connection to the rest of Sonoma County, Marin County, and beyond to the greater Bay Area. An automobile connection from the slip - street directly in to the SMART station is also planned. Page 3 3) The project's proposed internal street grid. A semi -regular urban street grid will provide internal circulation, access to the surrounding transportation infrastructure, and ample space for on -street parking. Additionally, the project will add to the City's bike network along State Farm Drive, and along internal project streets. Overall, the project will emphasize the pedestrian experience by providing active and urban sidewalks, appropriately scaled lighting features, and plentiful landscaping. Parking Approximately 1,550 parking spaces are planned in association with the project. Beyond traditional parking, the project also anticipates significant numbers of people will use SMART and ride hailing services like Uber and Lyft to get to and from the project. Table 2 below is a summary of the current planned parking (adjustments are still be made to the total parking count as designs for street frontages, etc. are being finalized). Table 2: Planned Parking for the Station Avenue Project Type of Parking: Number of Spaces: Mixed Use Street Parking 192 Surface Lots 456 Structured Garages 458 Residential Garages 360 Residential Street Parking 90 TOTAL 1,556 Of those spaces planned as on -street parking, they are to be located along Rohnert Park Expressway's planned slip -street, portions of State Farm Drive (south of Venture), and on the internal streets of the project. 456 spaces are planned within scattered surface lots in the mixed use area of the project. Another 458 total spaces are planned in the two parking garages (one main garage adjacent to the hotel and a second smaller garage on the second level of Building F next to the central plaza). Approximately 360 individual residential garage spaces are planned for the townhomes and row homes. NEXT STEPS: Staff will continue to work with the applicant to finalize the Final Development Plan and supporting documents for the project, including the site plan and architectural designs. The project developer is working to have the majority of the project complete and ready for occupancy in the third quarter of 2020. This completion date is driving an efficient and streamlined approval process, with entitlements to be completed by the end of this summer or in early fall. Staff and the developer's team are working closely together to achieve the schedule goals, outlined in Table 3 below. Table 3: Tentative Entitlement Schedule for the Station Avenue Project Planning Commission: Study Session Parks Commission: Study Session July 2018 Page 4 Parks Commission: Park Dedication Recommendation August 2018 Planning Commission: Recommendation to City Council on Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Map, CEQA compliance document, Development Agreement, and Form -Based Code. City Council: Approval of Final Development Plan, Conditional Use September 2018 Permit, Tentative Map, CEQA compliance document, Development Agreement, and Form -Based Code Staff anticipates seeking the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation in early August and the Planning Commission's recommendation in late August, before going back to City Council in late summer or early fall for consideration of project approvals. This schedule is contingent on the results of environmental studies that are currently underway. In addition, the City and the developer are negotiating a Development Agreement that will define the various responsibilities relating to this project. The Planning Commission has the responsibility of reviewing and providing recommendations on the Development Agreement. Attachments 1. Site Plan Comparison — PDA Plan to the Proposed Development 2. Draft Regulating Plan of the proposed Downtown District Amenity Zone Form Based Code 3. Excerpts from the Draft Final Development Plan for Station Avenue APPROVALS: Zach Tufin�er, Planner III AICP, Planning Manager Page 5 �NY4MO Date �1 jvll Date Central Rohnert Park Priority Development Area Plan Figure 4.1: Priority Development Area Subareas and District I 1(111 i LEGEND r .rC��■ .:. � nwuuraa i =1 r F =1 r i 1 - t � 1 March 2016 Priority Development area city Umits SMART Rall Une and Station SMART MuIH-Use PaM Thangle Business Subarea City Center Subarea Central Commercial Subarea Station Center Subarea Creekside Neighborhood Subarea Downtown District f— 1 as FEET i 1 5 1 - P j f 1 .f.FSS PARK [ .. 1 F 1 � 1 e. 1 '- 1 f1 ? 1 j Triangle f Bsrsirbe�as � 1 1 � i 1 � 1 7j 1 r r ---.— ! liir�raai�cn arv.,.ar 1 r 4:fty Ctintr2r ---------------- Is t 1 1 a Station i� tion Location A fa.tl center �� rhYrFRr.:5s. 1 �Jk ----------------- -F. ��•- 1 I f s Source: AECOM, 2015 Page 42 f7l ti,—9"", L"', Chapter 4: Land Use Figure 4.6: Station Center Subarea Land Use Designations Source: AECOM, 2015 Centrai Ronner. P.-, P"Onty ce,t—, : Pae 4-15 i ----4orw 9W W SMART PLATFORM o' too' zoo' aoo' a - DEVELOPMENT PLAN Buildings B1, C1 & DI Ground Level: Retail Second Level: Office 3rd, 4th & 5th: Residential Building F1 Ground Level: Retail Second Level: Parking 3rd, 4th & 5th: Residential Building G1 Ground Level: Retail 2nd, 3rd & 4th Levels: Office Buildings A1, D2, D3, E7 & E2 Ground Level: Retail Building B2 Ground Level: Retail Second Level: Retail Building A2 Ground Level: Retail Building A3 Ground Level: Parking 2nd, 3rd & 4th: Parking Building A4 Ground Level- Hotel 2nd, 3rd, 4th & 5th: Hotel Buildings C2-C4 & F2 -F4 Three Levels: Row Houses Buildings H1 -H8, JI -J8, KI -K6 & 1-1-1-4 Three Levels: Townhouse Building D4 Ground Level: Residential Clubhouse Building DS Ground Level: Maintenance Building m m Hinebaugh Creek Trl Rohnert Park Expy Raleys Towne C Ln r+ r� Qj 3 O Hinebaugh Creek Trl Rohnert Park Ex pv Rohnert Park Expy Toyo n Ct Regulating Plan I"=100' Downtown District Zones i--I--I� Railroad Proposed Thoroughfare DDAZ Boundary FProposed Open Spaces Downtown Neighborhood Downtown Main Street Downtown Core Priority Retail Area Figure 17.06.720.A.4 (DDAZ Regulating Plan) Rohnert Park, California Final Draft for PC Meeting: July 5, 2018 0 100' 200' 0 is•� '!. f-.,_ Yrs:z ' feC' °�,.�� ~ STATION - "' �M u L R y 1 •err ( ", E � I � t '� `� � � ' � `�. ::.!� ,� Iy ►► 911 MMA M WOR r - i tea+ r - i �' '� • • � Y 3 41 . L YJ • •` � � --._-_ 11^1} �� �� �-„�•,�•�-fA �- �� . k` 'r Id ol .ir. t , �1b� t �, i _ _ ( .rte . i • t � ;� � �_ .�. ��.{ ••` ��-- , _ ;c� r _. is e -•k '� . � . �: � � _- +��r:�sr /,UNC71 a tI�NNElt I ” - - • - + Alt• � �t--• i/%//ice � ����� \�\ h owl I i r -- fir. f414. �r--�. _ _ _ tai �' _ ��+#I�� ~,�~ - - _` + ■ ' r _. _ _ _ _ - __- __ _ __ 4 - - _ _ - y_ . r-1 SMART PLATFORM a ---RW 71 'forking - Commercial }a~ i. a L1 rL2- i 0' 100' 200' 400' r K5 i,►5� iK2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN Buildings Bi, C1 & D1 Ground Level: Retail Second Level: Office 3rd, 4th & 5th: Residential Building F1 Ground Level: Retail Second Level: Parking 3rd, 4th & 5th: Residential Building G1 Ground Level: Retail 2nd, 3rd & 4th Levels: Office Buildings Al, 132, D3, El & E2 Ground Level: Retail Building B2 Ground Level: Retail Second Level: Retail Building A2 Ground Level: Retail Building A3 Ground Level: Parking 2nd, 3rd & 4th: Parking Building A4 Ground Level: Hotel 2nd, 3rd, 4th & 5th: Hotel Buildings C2-C4 & F2 -F4 Three Levels: Row Houses Buildings 1-11-1-18, J1 -J8, K1 -K6 & L1-L4 Three Levels: Townhouse Building D4 Ground Level: Residential Clubhouse Building D5 Ground Level: Maintenance Building 7, 7, 77 1 '"1 1W.111ALL611ii. 11" �iM�l n !d riM r•IN". lift huM6911, I "ism Ina no dly iij M A a a we r a lhsuAll I 1�4 11 11' `�4 Fr". I•I It -111 111`11 it .0000, IF__j lam a INNS v4,ftw AW* owwo 4--mms. - 7- MINING@ lin iftmi J=A" AHOMHO T 1.1 1 iON a " ,,WL.... NO 1-1- WINC -Ago— Elevations B1 and C1 milli 0101 low ell wn MEN milli' MINING@ lin iftmi J=A" AHOMHO T 1.1 1 iON a " ,,WL.... NO 1-1- WINC -Ago— Elevations B1 and C1 milli CAPE MIMMMI go ,Mimi _ apparel r cures ft ale. •ou■ F W r �a Au, 1� 1� 1MMM i iia i � lkiEt' � � • '. ■. . II �ILL— 11 '��1►. i 1■+u�i w 11 1 mmm ia- �.. = ioi�■ — Al. --- R...._ -�I-�J'(�}�.'-.'.���-�.�j�{'.-.,•'}�-jf I n 1 1 rI 111 1 ! 11 i. I I I F =1111 1111 ':.1111 1.111 �� 14 I��. I}�--J}'.-,-y{I-�{I ��L-,,j�'- jjI-..��I �I{.,;L..I{...�I �L11...1 X11 aa -r .r r rrr -rr I� I -r-w $=rte ar rai saga. a--a':i.aaa as-�r: asa aa- W1J M .-.4--H 1 Ole or k r !! IC �estllku AW C!R its.# Eli Elevations D1 and F1 CYCN— r FACADE MATERIAL SCHEDULE 1❑ 2❑ m F4-1 67 7❑ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CORTEN STEEL FACADE PANELS FIBER CEMENT FACADE PANELS SMOOTH METAL PANEL SIDING CORRUGATED METAL PANEL SIDING FIBER CEMENT FACADE PLANKS COMPOSITE WOOD/RICE PLANKS METAL SCREEN PAINTED ARCHITECTURAL STEEL FRAMING THIN CLAD LIMESTONEVENEER GLASS RAILING METAL RAILING METAL FRAMED CANOPY ALUMINUM FRAMING WINDOW WALL ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT ALUMINUM FRAMED WINDOW MASONRY VENEER BLOCK ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE PAINTED CONCRETE FIBER CEMENT LOUVER CABLE RAIL FIGURE S, BUILDING AS WEST ELEVATION FIGURE 4, BUILDING A9 NORTH ELEVATION LAULIMA DEVELOPMENT ROHNERT STATION BUIILDINGA3-CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS 15MAY 6 PAGE B FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FACADE MATERIAL SCHEDULE 1❑ CORTEN STEEL FACADE PANELS 20 FIBER CEMENT FACADE PANELS ® SMOOTH METAL PANEL SIDING ® CORRUGATED METAL PANEL SIDING S5 FIBER CEMENT FACADE PLANKS © COMPOSITE WOOD/RICE PLANKS 70 METAL SCREEN ® PAINTED ARCHITECTURAL STEEL FRAMING 9❑ THIN CLAD LIMESTONE VENEER 10 GLASS RAILING l l METAL RAILING 12 METAL FRAMED CANOPY Fl 3-1 ALUMINUM FRAMING WINDOW WALL 14 ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT Fl 5-1 ALUMINUM FRAMED WINDOW Fl 6-1 MASONRY VENEER BLOCK 17 ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE Fl 8-1 PAINTED CONCRETE F19-1 FIBER CEMENT LOUVER F20-1 CABLE RAIL FIGURE 8, BUILDING D2/3 WEST ELEVATION FIGURE 9, BUILDING D2/3 EAST ELEVATION FIGURE 11, BUILDING Al WEST ELEVATION FIGURE 10, BUILDING Al EAST ELEVATION FIGURE 12, BUILDING Al SOUTH ELEVATION LAULIMA DEVELOPMENT ROHNERT STATION BUIILDINGSAll &D2/3—CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS 15MAY 8 PAGE s FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FACADE MATERIAL SCHEDULE 1❑ Rl a F6 I FE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CORTEN STEEL FACADE PANELS FIBER CEMENT FACADE PANELS SMOOTH METAL PANEL SIDING CORRUGATED METAL PANEL SIDING FIBER CEMENT FACADE PLANKS COMPOSITE WOOD/RICE PLANKS METAL SCREEN PAINTED ARCHITECTURAL STEEL FRAMING THIN CLAD LIMESTONE VENEER GLASS RAILING METAL RAILING METAL FRAMED CANOPY ALUMINUM FRAMING WINDOW WALL ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT ALUMINUM FRAMED WINDOW MASONRY VENEER BLOCK ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE PAINTED CONCRETE FIBER CEMENT LOUVER CARLE RAI[ FIGURE 25, BUILDING G NORTH ELEVATION FIGURE 26, BUILDING G SOUTH ELEVATION LAULIMA DEVELOPMENT ROHNERT STATION FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FIGURE 27, BUILDING G WEST ELEVATION BUIILDING G1 — CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS ffice FFE: 146'_0" ffice FFE: 132'-0" Tice FFE:-118'-0"* etail FFE: 100'-0" iffice FFE: 146'-0"* office FFE: 132'_0" ffice FFE: 118'-0" etail FFE: 100'-0'L* 15 MAY 2018 PAGE 13 FACADE MATERIAL SCHEDULE 1❑ CORTEN STEEL FACADE PANELS ® FIBER CEMENT FACADE PANELS E] SMOOTH METAL PANEL SIDING ® CORRUGATED METAL PANEL SIDING 50 FIBER CEMENT FACADE PLANKS © COMPOSITE WOOD/RICE PLANKS 7❑ METAL SCREEN ® PAINTED ARCHITECTURAL STEEL FRAMING 9Q THIN CLAD LIMESTONE VENEER Fl 0-1 GLASS RAILING Fl -fl METAL RAILING Fl -21 METAL FRAMED CANOPY Fl -3-1 ALUMINUM FRAMING WINDOW WALL rl-4-1 ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT 15 ALUMINUM FRAMED WINDOW 16 MASONRY VENEER BLOCK [771 ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE 18 PAINTED CONCRETE 19 PAINTED METAL FRAME F2-01 CABLE RAIL F2-11 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Irl r rr �^ Iff, F FIGURE 30, ROW HOUSES SIDE ELEVATION FIGURE 28, ROW HOUSES 9 -UNIT CLUSTER FRONT ELEVATION FIGURE 29, ROW HOUSES 9 -UNIT CLUSTER REAR ELEVATION FIGURE 31, ROW HOUSES 3 -UNIT ELEVATION FIGURE 32, ROW HOUSES S -UNIT CLUSTER FRONT ELEVATION Floor: 122"-0" Floor: 1121-0" * door:_ 100',0" :Ivor: 122°-0' = loor: 112'_0' =Ivor: 100'-0" * LAU LI MA DEVELOPMENT RO H N ERT STATION ROW HOUSES -CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS 15 MAY 2018 PAGE 14 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FACADE MATERIAL SCHEDULE 117 CORTEN STEEL FACADE PANELS 0 FIBER CEMENT FACADE PANELS 0 SMOOTH METAL PANEL SIDING ® CORRUGATED METAL PANEL SIDING 5❑ FIBER CEMENT FACADE PLANKS © COMPOSITE WOOD/RICE PLANKS TJ METAL SCREEN ® PAINTED ARCHITECTURAL STEEL FRAMING 90 THIN CLAD LIMESTONE VENEER 10 GLASS RAILING rf-11 METAL RAILING 12 METAL FRAMED CANOPY [1-3-1 ALUMINUM FRAMING WINDOW WALL F14-1 ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT [T-51 ALUMINUM FRAMED WINDOW Fl -61 MASONRY VENEER BLOCK 17 ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE 18 PAINTED CONCRETE 19 PAINTED METAL FRAME 20 CABLE RAIL 21 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF F2 2-1 ASPHALT SHINGLES 23 1 LIMESTONE PLASTER 111111 11 11 111111 11 ill ii 11 _� �1 IA •s on AO 'ss ■r an rt as ■a _ )a R■ sA . •. t NNW 1i ii li 11 IiiIii 1an as 111 X111 it limill .. FIGURE 33, ROW HOUSES 7 -UNIT CLUSTER FRONT ELEVATION FIGURE 34, ROW HOUSES 6 -UNIT CLUSTER FRONT ELEVATION FIGURE 35, ROW HOUSES 4 -UNIT FRONT ELEVATION FIGURE 36, ROW HOUSES 5 -UNIT CLUSTER FRONT ELEVATION LAULIMA DEVELOPMENT ROHNERT STATION TOWNHOUSES—CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS 15 MAY 201 PAGE 155 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 r7r" .� is N AV flr Ql �� •�.. �..;' Otto 1 r•i �T--• i-_ 11• j, S�i.: ,.pp^^� '�:V I �'R�, °JI —' {: , 11 0 Ro P46- "I. I � r n $V bDSA ' � rpt I{ 4 s -• \ }��►- �� � i VIA fill 4 i �I#T +N*--' ti r n $V bDSA ' � rpt I{ 4 s -• \ }��►- �� � i VIA fill 4 �E PRIMARY PROJECT ENTRANCE MODIFIED PUBLIC ROUTES I .. LEFT -TURN LANE NEW LOCAL ACCESS LANE 4fA, ♦ l f ♦ ��Q♦ ♦ If If O♦ , ii 1 'f J, ♦ SMART PLATFORM GRAND STREET PUBLIC VEHICULAR CIRCULATION Rohnert Park Expressway: Rohnert Station Development proposes adding a shared -use local access eastbound lane for traffic, 450 park- ing and a possible link to the SMART parking. In addition, Hohnert Sta- tion Development proposes adding a new left -turn lane from South- bound RPX on to Quest Street. State Farm Drive: Rohnert Station Development proposes removing one lane of traffic and adding parallel parking and a bike lane. Enterprise Drive: Enterprise Drive will retain the center -turn lane. 1 ,. . T -J �r_� QUEST STREET ♦ ♦LLI I IJJ ♦ ♦ W W iU V1 4f z i rW jLj N ♦ _-r -- — -r y 1 - STATE FARM DRIVE FIGURE 52, PUBLIC ROUTE MODIFICATIONS LAULIMA DEVELOPMENT 0' 100 200' 400' RNV ENTERPRISE DRIVE STATE FARM DRIVE ROHNERT STATION FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ROHNERT PARK EXPRESSWAY F-1 FIGURE 53, PUBLIC ROUTE MODIFICATIONS PUBLIC VEHICULAR CIRCULATION 15 MAY 2018 PAGE 23 RIDE SERVICE LOCATIONS E - - - SECONDARY DRIVE AISLE (PRIVATE) F - - - SECONDARY DRIVE AISLE (PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE) - _ } PRIMARY DRIVE AISLE (PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE) SMART PLATFORM �4---I----------- 1 y------ 'fir ♦,�-_----_--G-_D-T--,t-----__ - - I--_--_-, r ?wm � ___� •I 1 I!t 1 I I I I i — --J A - I - ---- -J IS- I ,? CA (4 t I 1 1> < �! OUEST STREET 1 1 r—T—�1--- _ I r. 1; ;Z �..� ._.i--�I — Q� 1 -.W - - 1 Q L-=-- 1-- 1 L_J 1— ,' ✓ /--- STATE FARM DRIVE FIGURE 54, ON-SITE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION LAULIMA DEVELOPMENT ROHNERT STATION FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON-SITE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION Major on-site drive aisles will be constructed throughout the project site. Grand Street, Quest Street, Station Avenue, and Spirit Avenue will serve as these main thoroughfares connecting architecture and program. Parallel parking will occur asymmetrically on both sides of Quest Street and Grand Street. Angled parking will occur along Sta- tion Avenue, west of Quest Street, with the east portion providing parallel parking. This east portion of Station Avenue that cuts through Station Square will be curbless in order to make the space feel con- tinuous and enhance the overall pedestrian experience. Secondary drive aisles will be constructed throughout the project site connecting various retail and residential parking lots to major drive aisles. The drive aisles for retail will be interconnected with major drive lanes (i.e., Quest Street and Grand Street) allowing for shared and fexible use. Drive aisles serving residential will be private and limited in their connections to major site drive lanes, creating a sepa- rate experience between the two types of development. These pri- vate drive aisles will be secured by a 4' tall decorative fence and remote access gate. Ride service drop-off locations have been strategically placed throughout the site, responding to areas of high pedestrian use. Lo- cations include: along Station Avenue, Grand Street, and Quest Street adjacent to retail. BLOCK C PARKING COURTYARD - 120" FIGURE 55, COURTYARD SECTIONS ON-SITE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION 15 MAY 2018 PAGE 24 ''��# ,�r_." '.r•,� ';i r �'' � //fes �� •r;� `•� .,_ �l�a f f ra lk .41 i • - I r r-- q' ill � � + • .. LAULIMA DEVELOPMENT ROHNERT STATION PLACE MAKING 15 MAY 2018 PAGE 30 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FIGURE 58, STATION SQUARE FIGURE 59, STATION SQUARE - CONCEPTUAL RENDERING LAULIMA DEVELOPMENT THE SQUARE EVENT LAWN WITH STAGE RETAIL KIOSKS OUTDOOR CAFE SEATING COMMUNITY LIVING ROOM OUTDOOR LOUNGE SEATING FOUNTAIN FEATURE SELFIE SPOT RIDE SERVICE DROP-OFF/PICK UP FIGURE 60, KEY PLAN ROHNERT STATION FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN STATION SQUARE - CONCEPTUAL PLAN 15 MAY 2018 PAGE 32 City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission Report DATE: July 12, 2018 ITEM NO: 8.2 SUBJECT: PLMC18-0002 Amend Rohnert Park Municipal Code Title 17 Zoning to modify inclusionary housing requirements REQUEST: Approve Resolution 2018-12 Recommending City Council Amend Chapter 17.07.020.N — Footnotes: Inclusionary Housing APPLICANT: City of Rohnert Park Subiect Amend Municipal Code Title 17 - Zoning to amend the current inclusionary housing ordinance to only apply to `for sale' projects, allow an `in -lieu' fee option for projects of 50 units or less, and to create a limited exception for a defined geographical portion of the Priority Development Area. On June 26, 2018 the public hearing for this item was continued to the July 12, 2018 meeting. Summary This municipal code amendment accomplished a number of things currently identified in the City's General Plan: (1) Eliminates the inclusion of the inclusionary housing requirement for rental housing. This is in response to a recent Supreme Court case which left our ordinance inconsistent with state law. While the state law subsequently changed again, Council indicated its preference for a nexus fee on rental housing, rather than going back to an inclusionary requirement. (2) The amendments allow for an in -lieu fee option for projects of 50 units or less. It is more difficult for smaller developments to provide affordable housing on-site. This results in only a few units. This is also difficult for the city to administer. The 50 unit level was chosen as that is the same threshold for projects to qualify for an in -lieu fee for park dedication requirements. (3) Importantly, the proposal creates an exemption to the inclusionary requirement in a limited portion of the downtown. The City recognizes that the PDA area has a high percentage of affordable housing already, in line with the City's affordable housing goals. Page 1 Background On October 24, 2017, staff along with representatives from our fiscal consultant, Economic & Planning Systems (EPS), presented information, options, and recommendations to the City Council concerning inclusionary housing requirements, in -lieu fees, and other housing fees. The Council accepted staff's recommendation to establish an in -lieu fee level of $12,400 as an option for "for sale" projects of 50 units or less and to eliminate the inclusionary requirement for rental housing projects. Council also directed staff to look at options for a different inclusionary requirement for the downtown. On April 10, 2018, staff presented options to Council for different downtown inclusionary policies. The Council directed staff to develop a limited exception for housing projects in a defined geographical area within the Priority Development Area Plan (downtown Rohnert Park) from the inclusionary requirement for the purpose of incentivizing downtown development and because housing stock in that area is typically affordable without further regulatory requirements. Affordable housing, which is often equated with "workforce" housing, serves residents with "extremely low" up to "moderate" household incomes as outlined in Table 1. Table 1 - 2017 Household Income Levels Definitions (percentages are the ercent of area median household income or MHI) Persons in Household Extremely Low (30%) Very Low (50%) Low 80%) Median (100%) Moderate (120%) 1 $18,550 $30,850 $49,350 $61,700 $74,040 2 $21,200 $35,250 $56,400 $70,500 $84,600 3 $23,850 $39,650 $63,450 $79,300 $95,160 4 $26,450 $44,050 $70,500 $88,100 $105,720 5 $28,780 $47,600 $76,150 $95,200 $114,240 The state imposes affordable housing goals on local agencies through its regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) process, which the City is required to translate into the Housing Element of its General Plan. The City is making good progress on its RHNA goals for the period ending in 2022. We are on course to build more units at the very low and low levels than our RHNA obligations require. We are currently still short of the needed extremely low and moderate units, but the City is exploring other strategies to generate those units including partnering with the Housing Land Trust, or buying down planned affordable units in existing or planned elements. Figure 2 illustrates that near-term planned projects in the University District and Southeast Specific Plan Areas, together with a density bonus provided to the Avram House (Bella Creek) project, will allow the City to meets its state assigned allocations for the low and very low income categories. As illustrated, the current plans do not yet provide the City with a strategy for meeting its assigned allocations in the extremely low and moderate income categories. Page 2 Historically, the City funded its affordable housing initiatives through its redevelopment agency. Since the implementation of the redevelopment agency dissolution law in 2011, the City's primary tools for securing affordable housing have changed and now include: • The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 17.07.020.N), which requires that new housing developments of more than 5 units include affordable housing units within the development plan; • Development Agreements, which have included "affordable housing plans" that often go beyond the minimum requirements of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance; • The existing Affordable Housing Linkage Fee, which ensures that non-residential development contributes to the cost of affordable housing; and • Historic housing agency funds, which can only be used for housing benefitting persons with incomes under 60% of area MHI. In its simplest form, the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requires that at least 15% of all units in a new development of five or more units meet the affordability criteria outlined below. • For developers building "for sale" units: 50% affordable to low incomes and 50% affordable to moderate incomes. • For developers building rental units: 50% affordable to very low incomes and 50% affordable to low incomes. When the current ordinance was written, it was intended to be applicable to both new rental and new for -sale housing. Subsequent case law (Palmer/Sixth Street Properties LP v. City of Los Angeles) prohibited the City from imposing its inclusionary requirements on new rental housing. Because of the Palmer decision, certain apartment complexes such as Fiori Estates and the Reserve at Dowdell, were not subject to the City's ordinance and have been constructed without contributing to the City's housing allocations or objectives. Effective January 1, 2018, changes to state law clarified that inclusionary housing requirements can be imposed on rental projects. An ordinance enacted pursuant to this new law, AB 1505, that imposes rental housing affordability requirements, must provide for alternative means of compliance that include, but are not limited to, in -lieu fees, land dedication, off-site construction, or acquisition and rehabilitation of existing units. Proposal Downtown Inclusionary Policy: In order to develop an understanding of the appropriate inclusionary housing target for the downtown area, staff analyzed the existing and planned housing stock within the Central Rohnert Priority Development Area. Based on the land use and zoning designations, housing is allowed in the area bordered by Avram and Santa Alicia Drive to the south, Hinebaugh Creek to the north, Commerce Boulevard to the west and the SMART tracks to the east. This area includes 1,390 total existing housing units and an additional 835 planned housing units for a total of 2,225 units. The City has invested substantially in affordable housing in this area and currently there are 308 deed restricted affordable units in this area. In addition, the planned 90 -unit Avram House Apartment Complex at the southern edge of the PDA was granted a density bonus in exchange for 7 units at the very -low income level. When those 7 affordable units at Avram House are added to the existing 308 in the downtown area, the total is Page 3 315 affordable units in the PDA. Figure 3 illustrates the location of the existing and planned affordable units. Figure 3: Proposed Boundary of Downtown Area to Be Exempt from Inclusionary Requirement, with Current and Proposed Affordable Housing Units Assuming full buildout of the PDA, the existing affordable housing stock in the PDA equates to almost 15 percent of the total planned housing units, and would surpass that if any affordable housing projects or projects seeking density bonuses are constructed. Because of this, staff is recommending that no additional inclusionary requirements be imposed in this area. As noted above, this recommendation would not preclude developers from continuing to use the City's density bonus program. This recommendation is further supported by the fact that the majority of housing thus far developed in the downtown area has been rental housing, which the revised inclusionary ordinance would not apply to anyway (and has not been applied to for some time due to the previously discussed case law). As part of the direction to proceed with these changes to the ordinance, Council directed staff to negotiate for at least 15 affordable units to be included as part of the Rohnert Station project. These 15 units would bring the affordable housing stock in the PDA up to 15% of full buildout. Rental Housing Policy: The City's inclusionary housing ordinance currently requires that 7.5% of the units in a new rental project be affordable to low income earners (80% of MHI), and 7.5% of the units are to be affordable to very low income earners (50% of MHI). While the Palmer decision made these requirements unenforceable in 2009, changes to the statute on which Palmer was based now allow the City to apply these requirements. In October, Council declined to consider reinstating the rental inclusionary requirement at this time. Page 4 In April, Council directed staff to develop a nexus fee on rental projects, so that the City will have a housing policy that imposes an inclusionary requirement or in -lieu fee on "for sale" residential projects, a linkage fee on nonresidential projects, and a nexus fee on rental projects. Nexus fees are based on the concept of offsetting the impacts of additional market rate housing on the need for more affordable housing. Staff anticipates bringing that proposed nexus fee ordinance (proposed as part of Title 3 of the Municipal Code: Revenue and Finance) to Council with these inclusionary housing ordinance amendments. The recommended nexus fee for rental projects will likely be at a rate of approximately $3.23 per square foot. Possible Use of Housing Fee Funds: While staff believes that continued emphasis on inclusionary construction in large planned developments is the best way for the City to meet its allocations for new affordable housing, the City's Housing Element also outlines programmatic actions to preserve and rehabilitate existing affordable housing stock. The revenue collected from the proposed fee programs would provide the City with the funds to conduct these types of programs, as well as support new construction where appropriate. Unlike historic redevelopment or housing agency funds, fee revenue can be used to support programs for moderate income earners as well as extremely low, very low and low income earners. Staff Analysis The recommended code changes are consistent with City Council direction. The changes are part of a larger, comprehensive package to update the City's affordable housing policy. The exemption of the downtown area from the inclusionary housing policy will only have a minimal effect on the generation of new affordable housing units in the downtown area, but will reduce development costs in that area, further incentivizing the development of downtown Rohnert Park. In -lieu fees, coupled with the proposed nexus fee and the existing nonresidential linkage fee will provide a meaningful stream of revenue for affordable housing preservation. Staff will take a separate item to City Council that establishes the feel levels. Environmental Determination No California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis is required for this ordinance. The proposed ordinance is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3), as adoption will not have an impact on the environment, and 15378(b)(4), which says that the creation of government funding mechanisms that do not involve a commitment to a particular project do not fall under the auspices of CEQA. General Plan Consistency The proposed amendments would be consistent with the goals, policies and implementation measures contained in the General Plan Housing Elements: Policy HO -2.3 says that the City shall continue to ensure that an over -concentration of lower-income housing does not occur in one or more neighborhoods. The proposal would help to ensure that there is not an over - concentration of lower-income housing in the downtown area. Policy HO -3.3 says that the City shall continue to require below -market -rate housing to be included as part of residential ownership projects throughout the community. The proposed amendments would be consistent with this policy. Policy HO -3.5 says that the City shall avoid unnecessary costs to housing development, and Policy HO -3.8 says that the City shall strive to ensure affordability within the Central Rohnert Park PDA. The current proposal is consistent Page 5 with both of those policies. Eliminating the inclusionary policy for a small area of the new downtown reduces development costs in that area. At the same time, the in -lieu fee option for projects in the rest of the City, coupled with the proposed nexus fee and the existing nonresidential linkage fee will provide funding opportunities for affordable housing preservation in the downtown area. The proposed changes are also consistent with Programs HO -3.0 and HO -3.1) where staff was tasked conduct an in -lieu fee study for its inclusionary housing policy and adopt an in -lieu fee methodology and calculation. The proposed in -lieu fee level and calculation is proposed to accompany the recommended inclusionary policy changes if they are advanced to the City Council. Commensurately, these programs also directed the City to amend its inclusionary housing ordinance to remove the requirements for market rate rental projects. Findings The recommended findings to approve the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance are included in the attached resolution. Public Notification Since this is a change to the Municipal Code a public hearing is required before the Planning Commission and the City Council. This item has been duly noticed by publication in the Community Voice for amendments to the Municipal Code. On June 26, 2018 the Planning Commission continued the public hearing for this item to the July 12, 2018 meeting. Staff Recommendation Based on the analysis and findings of this report and the attached resolution, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by motion, adopt Resolution No. 2018-12 to recommend to the City Council these text amendments to Title 17 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code. Attachments: Planning Commission Resolution No. 2018-12 Exhibit A — RPMC Section 17.07.020.N — Footnotes: Inclusionary Housing APPROVALS: Jeff Bdi#enger, 4CP, Planning Manager Zach WrXger, Planner III Page 6 M1 Dat 7/1 4$ Date RESOLUTION NO. 2018-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDMENTS TO MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 17, ZONING TO MODIFY INCLUSIONARY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, the applicant, the City of Rohnert Park, filed Planning Application No. PLMC18-0002 proposing changes to the Rohnert Park Municipal Code ("RPMC") by amending Sections 17.07.020 — Footnotes; WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are in response to City Council direction from October 24, 2017 and April 10, 2018; WHEREAS, an inclusionary housing in -lieu fee study was prepared by Economic and Planning Systems, Inc.; WHEREAS, the proposed changes to Title 17 Zoning are consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation measures in the General Plan; WHEREAS, the proposed changes to Title 17 Zoning are attached hereto as Exhibit A; WHEREAS, pursuant to California State Law and the Rohnert Park Municipal Code, a public notice was published in the Community Voice for a minimum of 10 days prior to the first public hearing; WHEREAS, on June 28, 2018 the Planning Commission continued the public hearing on the proposal to July 12, 2018; WHEREAS, on July 12, 2018 the Planning Commission held a public hearing at which time interested persons had an opportunity testify either in support of or opposition to the proposal; and WHEREAS; the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in Planning Application No. PLMCI 8-0002 for the proposed amendments to Title 17 Zoning of the Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Rohnert Park makes the following findings, determinations and recommendations with respect to the proposed amendments to Sections 17.07.020.N — Footnotes: Inclusionary Housing based on the entire record of the proceeding, including the oral and written staff reports and all oral and written testimony and comments. Section 1. The above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings concerning Sections 17.07.020 — Footnotes of the Municipal Code: 1. That the proposed amendments to the Municipal Code are consistent with the General Plan 2020. Criteria Satisfied. The proposed amendments to the Municipal Code are consistent with the General Plan 2020 Goals and Policies of ensuring that there is not an over - concentration of affordable housing in one area (HO -2.3), avoiding unnecessary costs to housing development (HO -3.5), and ensuring affordability within the Central Rohnert Park Priority Development Area (HO -3.8). The proposed amendments are also consistent with Programs HO -3.0 and HO -3.13 which call for the development of an in -lieu fee and the amendment of the inclusionary housing ordinance to remove requirements for market rate rental projects. 2. That the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance will be beneficial to the public health, safety or welfare. Criteria Satisfied. The proposed amendments to the Municipal Code will provide for the health, safety and welfare of individuals living in Rohnert Park by continuing to provide mechanisms for the creation and funding of new affordable housing and the preservation of affordable housing. Section 3. Environmental Clearance No California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis is required for this ordinance. The proposed ordinance is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4), which says that the creation of government funding mechanisms that do not involve a commitment to a particular project do not fall under the auspices of CEQA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council adopt the Findings stated hereinabove and adopt this Amendment to the RPMC to amend Section 17.07.020 — Footnotes in the form provided in Exhibit A. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 12th day of July 2018 by the City of Rohnert Park Planning Commission by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ADAMS BLANQUIE BORBA GIUDICE HAYDON Attest: Susan Adams, Chairperson, Rohnert Park Planning Commission Susan Azevedo, Recording Secretary 17.07.020 - Footnotes. N. INCLUSIONARY HOUSING. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish a housing trust fund and an inclusionary requirement or an in -lieu fee on developers of ownership residential development projects. The fees will be used to defray the costs of providing affordable housing for very low-, low-, and moderate -income households in the city of Rohnert Park. The fees and inclusionary requirements required by this chapter do not replace other regulatory, development and processing fees or exactions, funding required pursuant to a development agreement or reimbursement agreement, assessments charged pursuant to special assessments or benefit assessment district proceedings, etc., unless so specified. 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words, phrases, and terms shall have the meanings set forth herein. Words not defined shall be given their common and ordinary meaning. "Affordable rent" means: (1) monthly rent plus a reasonable allowance for utilities that in aggregate do not exceed thirty percent of eighty percent of area median income for lower income households; and (2) monthly rent plus a reasonable allowance for utilities that in aggregate do not exceed thirty percent of fifty percent of area median income for very low-income households. In each case, the median income applicable to Sonoma County is as determined annually by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, adjusted for household size. Affordable rent shall be based on presumed occupancy levels of one person in a studio unit, two persons in a one -bedroom unit, three persons in a two-bedroom unit, and one additional person for each additional bedroom thereafter. "Affordable sales price" means the maximum purchase price that will be affordable to the specified target income household. A maximum purchase price shall be considered affordable only if the owner -occupied monthly housing payment is equal to or less than one -twelfth of thirty percent of income for the specified target income household. Affordable sales price shall be based upon presumed occupancy levels of one person in a studio unit, two persons in a one -bedroom unit, three persons in a two bedroom unit, and one additional person for each additional bedroom thereafter. "Affordable units" means those dwelling units which are required to be rented at affordable rents or purchased at an affordable sales price to specified households. "Annual household income" means the combined gross income for all adult persons living in a dwelling unit as calculated for the purpose of the Section 8 program under the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, or its successor. "Building permit" means a permit issued pursuant to Chapter 15.08 of Title 15 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code. "Building official" means the chief building official of the city of Rohnert Park, or the designee of such individual. "Concession" or "incentive" shall have the same meaning and applicability as set forth in Government Code Section 65915. Concessions and incentives may include, at the discretion of the city, any of the following: (1) a reduction in site development standards, or a modification of zoning requirements or architectural design requirements which exceed the minimum building standards approved by the State, including but not limited to minimum lot size, open space, yard, landscape maintenance, fencing, utility undergrounding, sidewalk, right-of-way dedication (not including curb -to -curb street width standards), parking and/or setback requirements; (2) approval of mixed use zoning in conjunction with the housing project if the non-residential uses will reduce the cost of the residential development and if the city determines that the non-residential uses are compatible with both the housing project and the existing or planned development in the area in which the housing project will be located; or (3) other regulatory incentives or concessions proposed by the developer which the developer shows will result in identifiable cost reductions, including but not limited to a waiver, reduction and/or reimbursement of taxes and fees which otherwise would be imposed on the project. "Construction costs" means the estimated cost per square foot of construction, as established by the building department of the city of Rohnert Park for use in the setting of regulatory fees and building permits, multiplied by the total square footage, minus the garage floor area, to be constructed. "Developer" means every person, firm, or corporation constructing, placing, or creating residential development directly or through the services of any employee, agent, independent contractor or otherwise. "Dwelling unit" shall have the meaning set forth in Chapter 17.04 of Title 17 of the city of Rohnert Park Municipal Code. "Housing fund" means the city of Rohnert Park affordable housing trust fund. "Housing in -lieu fee" or "in -lieu fee" means the fee established for ownership residential development projects. "Low-income households" means those households with incomes of up to eighty percent of median income. "Market rate units" means those dwelling units in a residential project which are not affordable units. "Median income" means the median income, adjusted for family size, applicable to Sonoma County as published annually pursuant to Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 6932 (or its successor provision) by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. "Moderate income households" means those households with incomes of up to one hundred twenty percent of median income. "Owner -occupied monthly housing payment" means the sum equal to the principal, interest, property taxes, homeowner's insurance and homeowner's association dues paid on an annual basis divided by twelve. "Residential development project" means a project for the construction or placement of any dwelling unit in a permanent location, or the subdivision of land which is planned, designed, or used for the following land use categories: a. Single-family residential: This category consists of single-family detached units and duplexes. b. Multi -family residential: This category consists of buildings containing three or more dwelling units and mobile home parks. "Very low-income households" means those households with incomes of up to fifty percent of median income. 3. Housing trust fund. a. There is hereby established the city of Rohnert Park affordable housing trust fund (the "housing fund"). Separate accounts within such housing fund may be created from time to time to avoid commingling as required by law or as deemed appropriate to further the purposes of the fund. b. The housing fund shall be administered by the city manager, or his/her designee, who shall have the authority to govern the housing fund consistent with this chapter, and to prescribe procedures for said purpose, subject to approval by the council, and payment for all expenditures must be in accordance with city purchasing and budgetary policies. Purposes and use of funds. (1) Monies deposited in the housing fund along with any interest earnings on such monies shall be used solely to increase and improve the supply of housing affordable to households of moderate-, low- and very low-income households; including, but not limited to: Acquisition of property and property rights; (ii) Cost of construction including costs associated with planning, administration, and design, as well as actual building or installation, as well as any other costs associated with the construction or financing of affordable housing; (iii) Reimbursement to the city for such costs if funds were advanced by the city from other sources; and (iv) Reimbursement of developers or property owners who have been required or permitted to install facilities which are beyond that which can be attributed to a specific development. Monies may also be used to cover reasonable administrative expenses not reimbursed through processing fees, including reasonable consultant and legal expenses related to the establishment and/or administration of the housing fund and reasonable expenses for administering the process of calculating, collecting, and accounting for inclusionary housing in -lieu fees and any deferred city fees authorized by this section. No portion of the housing fund may be diverted to other purposes by way of loan or otherwise. (2) Monies in the housing fund shall be used in accordance with the priorities identified in the Rohnert Park community development commission's five-year implementation plan, which must be consistent with the city's housing element, to construct, acquire, rehabilitate or subsidize very low-, low- and moderate -income housing and/or to assist other governmental entities, private organizations or individuals in the construction and rehabilitation of very low- low-, and moderate -income housing. Monies in the housing fund may be disbursed, hypothecated, collateralized or otherwise employed for these purposes from time to time as the city council determines is appropriate to accomplish the purposes of the housing fund. These uses include, but are not limited to, assistance to housing development corporations, equity participation loans, grants, pre -home ownership co -investment, pre -development loan funds, participation leases, or other public/private partnership arrangements. The housing fund monies may be extended for the benefit of rental or owner occupied housing or housing services. 4. Ownership residential development project: Inclusionary requirements. Inclusionary requirements. (1) In a for -sale project, at least fifteen percent of all new dwelling units in a residential development of five or more units shall be affordable, and shall be constructed and completed not later than the related market rate units. One half of the affordable units shall be affordable to low-income households and the remaining half shall be affordable to moderate -income households. (2) Notwithstanding the above, this section shall not apply to projects which fall into one or more of the following categories: (i) A residential development project located within the following portion of the Central Rohnert Park Priority Development Area: the area is bounded on the west by Commerce Boulevard, the south by Avram Avenue and Santa Alicia Drive, on the east by the SMART railroad tracks, and the north by Hinebaugh Creek. (ii) A residential development project to the extent it has received a vested right to proceed without payment of housing impact fees pursuant to state law. (iii) Building permits for residential development projects if compliance with this section for such project has already been satisfied including, but not limited to, building permits on newly created lots where the subdivider has built affordable units or otherwise satisfied this section. (iv) Any dwelling unit or residential development project which is damaged or destroyed by fire or natural catastrophes so long as the square footage and use of the building remains the same. (v) A residential development project subject to a development agreement that provides for alternative means of addressing the affordable housing requirements of this section, such as an alternative equivalent action. b. For fractions of required affordable units, the developer may elect, at his or her option, to construct the next higher whole number of affordable units, perform an equivalency action alternative which has received the approval of council pursuant to subsection 4.c, or pay the in -lieu fee specified in subsection 5 for such fraction. c. Alternative equivalent action. (1) A developer of a residential development project may propose to meet the requirements of subsection 4.a by an alternative equivalent action, subject to the review and approval by the city council. (2) An alternative equivalent action may include, but is not limited to, donation of vacant land suitable for housing to a non-profit housing developer, transfer of inclusionary unit credits, construction of affordable units on another site or enforcement of required rental/sales price restrictions on existing market -rate dwelling units consistent with this section, and development of second dwelling units. All applicants proposing the use of an alternative equivalent action shall show how the alternative will further affordable housing opportunities in the city to an equal or greater extent than compliance with the express requirements of subsection 4.a. (i) Land donation. An applicant may donate land to a non-profit housing developer in place of actual construction of required affordable units upon approval of the city council. The dedicated land must be appropriately zoned, buildable, free of toxic substances and contaminated soils. It must be large enough to accommodate the number of required affordable units as indicated by a conceptual development plan. The land that is donated shall include lots that are fully improved with infrastructure, adjacent utilities, and grading, and fees paid. (ii) Transfer of inclusionary unit credits. The requirements of this section may be satisfied by acquiring inclusionary unit credits that are transferable from one residential development project to another, upon approval of the city council and as set forth herein. The city council may approve issuance of a specified number of credit certificates for that number of affordable units provided by a particular residential development project in excess of the minimum number required for the project. Credit certificates shall be issued for specific income categories and may only be used to satisfy the requirements for affordable units within that same income category. If the holder of the credit certificates transfers any or all certificates to a developer of a residential development project, the parties shall report the transaction to the planning and community development director, who will document the transfer. When a credit certificate is applied to meet the affordable unit requirement of a particular project, it shall be recorded at the time of project approval, and the subject certificates must be returned to the community development director. (iii) Second dwelling units. Not more than fifty percent of the requirements of this section may be satisfied through the development of second dwelling units at a ratio of two second dwelling units counted as one affordable housing unit. All second units counted toward meeting the affordable unit requirement shall be subject to the provisions of Section 17.07.020.N.10 — Continued Affordability. Second dwelling units shall only be allowed for meeting the affordability requirements for very -low and low-income households. C. The city council's consideration of an alternative equivalent action shall follow the procedures outlined in subsection 6 An alternative equivalent action shall be considered on a case-by- case basis by the city council and may be approved at the city council's sole discretion, if the city council determines that such alternative will further affordable housing opportunities in the city to an equal or greater extent than compliance with the express requirements of subsection 4.a and that an over concentration of affordable housing in one area will not occur. 5. In -lieu housing fee. a. For fractions of required affordable units or in the case of a residential development project that is on less than one acre or proposes 50 units or less and is not, and has not been, part of a larger residential development project, a developer of a residential development project may propose to meet the requirements of subsection 4.a by submitting at the time of application for a discretionary or building permit, whichever comes first, a request to pay the in -lieu fee. b. Time of payment of in -lieu fee. Unless otherwise preempted by law, the housing in -lieu fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. c. Calculation of housing in -lieu fee. The housing in -lieu fee shall be based upon a quantified translation of the inclusionary housing requirement of fifteen percent (or ten percent if the project is located in the Central Rohnert Park Priority Development Area), wherein one-half of the affordable units which are required to be constructed shall be available at prices affordable to low-income households. The remaining one-half of the required affordable units shall be available at prices affordable to moderate -income households. d. The amounts and calculation of the housing in -lieu fee shall be established by resolution of the city council. The in -lieu fee shall be calculated to reflect the affordability gap between development costs and the value of the affordable units, based on income levels. The housing in -lieu fee required by this section may be satisfied either by cash payment or upon the recommendation of the city manager and approval of the city council, by an alternative equivalent action which will provide city with a value equal to or greater than the amount of the required in -lieu fee. 6. Affordable housing concessions or incentives. a. For residential development projects, which meet the requirements of Section 17.07.020.N.4.a the construction of affordable units, the city shall follow the procedures described below and provide concessions and/or incentives as described in Section 17.07.020.N.2. (1) If requested by the applicant, within ninety days of submittal by the developer of a written preliminary conceptual development proposal describing and specifying the number, type, location and size of the housing development, and identifying any requests for density bonus, additional incentives, concessions or waivers or modification of development or zoning standards, necessary to make construction feasible for the proposed development, including the affordable units, prior to the submittal of any formal application for a discretionary approval (e.g., general plan amendment, rezoning, use permit, tentative subdivision or parcel map or other permit or entitlement), the city council shall review the preliminary development proposal at a public hearing noticed in accordance with Rohnert Park Municipal Code and indicate conceptual approval or disapproval of the proposed development and any requests for additional affordable housing incentives, concessions or waivers or modification of development or zoning standards. Such preliminary approval or disapproval shall not bind the city council but rather shall be subject to the discretion of the city council to modify its preliminary recommendations based upon a full review of all pertinent project information, including any environmental impact report, presented at the public hearing on the application. An application for such a request shall be submitted to the planning and community development director. (2) Complete applications for a residential development project which include all required submittal documents and which include the construction of affordable units shall be processed by all city departments before other residential land use applications regardless of the original submittal date. (3) Payment of all city -required fees on affordable units shall be deferred for payment, but shall be made prior to, and as a condition of, release of utilities and issuance of a certificate of occupancy. b. The city council may consider, on a case-by-case basis, in its sole discretion the provision of the following additional concessions or incentives identified in Government Code Section 65915 which are consistent with state law and the housing element of the city of Rohnert Park general plan for projects which meet or exceed the requirements specified in subsection 17.07.020.N.4.a: (1) An additional density bonus or other incentives of equal financial value subject to the city council's review and approval. (2) Waiver or modification of city standards that have a direct impact on reducing total project costs while remaining consistent with the latest edition of the California Building Code. The developer shall be responsible for documenting that the waiver or modification is necessary for the feasibility of the residential development project and is consistent with all applicable provisions of the California Building Code. (3) Provision of direct financial assistance in the form of a loan or grant using trust fund or other appropriate available funds subject to the recommendation of the city manager. (4) Deferral of payment of all city -required fees on market rate units, but payment shall be made prior to, and as a condition of, release of utilities and issuance of a certificate of occupancy. c. The city council may consider, on a case by case basis, at its sole discretion, the provision of additional concessions or incentives consistent with state law and the housing element of the city of Rohnert Park general plan for residential development projects which provide at least fifteen percent of the total dwelling units as affordable units. 7. Requirements for owner -occupied affordable units. a. One-half of the affordable units which are required to be constructed in connection with the construction of market rate units intended for owner -occupancy shall be available at affordable sales prices to moderate -income households. If one-half of the affordable units required at an affordable sales price to moderate -income households are available at affordable sales prices to households whose annual household income does not exceed one hundred percent of median income, the developer shall be entitled to an additional density bonus of five percent for the proposed development. b. As an alternative to receiving an additional density bonus of five percent, a developer may submit a request for another incentive of a financial value equal to the density bonus. Such requests shall be considered on a case-by-case basis by the city council and shall be approved, at the council's sole discretion, if the council determines that such alternative incentive will further affordable housing opportunities. c. The remaining one-half of the required affordable units shall be available at affordable sales prices to low income households. Where the number of required affordable units is an odd number, the number of units affordable to moderate income households may be one greater than the number affordable to low income households. Basic requirements for affordable units Affordable units shall be comparable in number of bedrooms, exterior appearance and overall quality of construction to market rate units in the same residential project. Subject to the approval of the planning and community development director and city manager, square footage of affordable units and interior features in affordable units may not be the same as or equivalent to those in market rate units in the same residential project, so long as they are of good quality and are consistent with contemporary standards for new housing. Affordable units shall be dispersed throughout the residential project, or, subject to the approval of the planning and community development director and city manager, may be clustered within the residential project when this furthers affordable housing opportunities. 9. Continued affordability. a. Prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy or approval of the final inspection for affordable units, regulatory agreements, resale restrictions, deed restrictions, deeds of trust and/or other documents, all of which must be acceptable to the city manager and consistent with the requirements of this chapter, shall be recorded against parcels having such affordable units and shall be effective for a minimum of forty-five years with respect to each owner -occupied unit. b. Notwithstanding any other provision in this section: (1) the maximum sales price permitted on resale of an affordable unit intended for owner -occupancy shall not exceed the seller's purchase price, adjusted for the percentage increase in median income since the seller's purchase, plus the value of substantial structural or permanent fixed improvements to the property, plus the cost of reasonable seller's broker fee as determined by the city manager; (2) the resale restrictions shall provide that in the event of the sale of an affordable unit intended for owner -occupancy, the city shall have the right to purchase or assign its right to purchase such affordable unit at the maximum price which could be charged to an eligible household. c. No household shall be permitted to occupy an affordable unit, or purchase an affordable unit for owner -occupancy, unless the city or its designee has approved the household's eligibility, or has failed to make a determination of eligibility within the time or other limits provided by a regulatory agreement or resale restrictions if the city or its designee maintains a list of eligible households, households selected to occupy affordable units shall be selected first from that list to the extent provided in the regulatory agreement or resale restrictions. 10. Annual Monitoring and Transfer Fees. For each rental affordable unit existing as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the current owner may be required to pay an annual monitoring fee for the term of required affordability. Such fee shall be specified in the regulatory agreement(s) required hereunder. For each owner -occupied affordable unit provided under this section, the current owner may be required to pay a transfer fee for any change of ownership during the term of required affordability. Such fee shall be specified in the resale restrictions required by subsection 17.07.020.N.9. 11. Discretionary Permit Requirements. Every discretionary permit for a residential development project of five or more units approved after the effective date of this chapter shall contain a condition detailing the method of compliance with this chapter. Every final and parcel map shall bear a note indicating whether compliance with the requirements of this section must be met prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot created by such map. 12. Requirements for certificate of occupancy/final inspection. a. No temporary or permanent certificate of occupancy shall be issued, final inspection approved or release of utilities authorized for any new dwelling unit in a residential development project until the developer has satisfactorily completed the requirements hereunder, i.e., on-site construction of affordable units, alternative equivalent action(s) or payment of the housing in -lieu fee. b. No temporary or permanent certificate of occupancy shall be issued, final inspection approved or release of utilities authorized for a dwelling unit described as exempt from the requirements of this chapter in subsection 4.a above until the developer has made a showing acceptable to the city manager that such an exemption is appropriate. 13. Enforcement Provisions. a. It is unlawful, a public nuisance and a misdemeanor for any person to sell or rent an affordable unit at a price or rent exceeding the maximum allowed under this chapter or to a household not qualified under this chapter, and such person shall be subject to a five hundred dollar fine per month from the date of original noncompliance until the affordable unit is in compliance with this section. b. The Rohnert Park city attorney's office or the Sonoma County district attorney, as appropriate, shall be authorized to abate violations of this chapter and to enforce the provisions of this chapter and all implementing regulatory agreements and resale controls placed on affordable units by civil action, injunctive relief, and any other proceeding or method permitted by law. c. The remedies provided for herein shall be cumulative and not exclusive and shall not preclude the city from any other remedy or relief to which it otherwise would be entitled under law or equity. 14. Adjustment. a. A developer of any project subject to the requirements of this chapter may appeal to the city council for a reduction, adjustment, or waiver of the requirements based upon the absence of any reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee charged and the inclusionary requirement. b. A developer subject to the requirements of this chapter who has received an approved tentative subdivision or parcel map, use permit or similar discretionary approval and who submits a new or revised tentative subdivision or parcel map, use permit or similar discretionary approval for the same property may appeal for a reduction, adjustment or waiver of the requirements with respect to the number of lots or square footage of construction previously approved. c. Any such appeal shall be made in writing and filed with the city clerk not later than ten calendar days before the first public hearing on any discretionary approval or permit for the development, or if no such discretionary approval or permit is required, or if the action complained of occurs after the first public hearing on such permit or approval, the appeal shall be filed within ten calendar days after payment of the fees objected to. d. The appeal shall set forth in detail the factual and legal basis for the claim of waiver, reduction, or adjustment. The city council shall consider the appeal at the public hearing on the permit application or at a separate hearing within sixty calendar days after the filing of the appeal, whichever is later. The appellant shall bear the burden of presenting substantial evidence to support the appeal including comparable technical information to support appellant's position. e. No waiver shall be approved by the city council for a new tentative subdivision or parcel map, use permit or similar discretionary approval on property with an approved tentative subdivision or parcel map, use permit or similar discretionary permit unless the council finds that the new tentative subdivision or parcel map, use permit or similar discretionary approval is superior to the approved project both in its design and its mitigation of environmental impacts. The decision of the council shall be final. If a reduction, adjustment, or waiver is granted, any change in the project shall invalidate the waiver, adjustment, or reduction of the fee or inclusionary requirement.