2007/05/21 Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Packet �pKNERT PIRA
DEPARTMENT -
ROHNERT PARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA
Monday May 21, 2007
6:30 p.m.
6750 Commerce Blvd., Rohnert Park
To any member of the audience desiring to address the Parks and Recreation Commission:
If you wish to speak on an item under discussion by the Parks and Recreation Commission, you may do so upon recognition
from the Chairperson.
After receiving recognition from the Chairperson, please walk to the rostrum located in the front and center of the room and
state your name and address for the record before making your presentation.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
• Roll Call:
Armerding IVfAronis [7f Bird [2/Black Griffin
• Approval of Minutes—April 16, 2007
• Acknowledgment of Recreation Department staff's report on the posting of the
meeting's agenda.
Agenda has been posted in three public places: Community Center, Public Safety
Building and City Hall, and on the City's Website.
• Unscheduled Public Appearances for public comments on items not listed on the
agenda, or on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time.
Item Topic
e:
Item#1 Park Dedication Ordinance: Action Item
Commission is asked to make comments on proposed Park Dedication Ordinance Amendments.
Comments will be passed on to City Council for the May 22 meeting.
Item#2 Park Regulation Ordinance:Action if needed
Commission is asked to review the draft Park Regulation Ordinance as it relates to the enforcement
of posted and non-posted park regulations.
Item#3 Skate Park Committee Report: Action Item
The Commission is asked to comment on and approve the Statement of Purpose prepared by the
Skate Park Committee.
Item#4 Consideration of Park Play Equipment for Replacement: Action item
The Commission is asked for a recommendation for park playground equipment replacement.The
State of California Jobs Housing Balance Program provides a grant of$208,518 for the replacement
of playground equipment at city parks.The funds must be encumbered by June 30, 2007.
Page 1 of 2
Rohnert Park Parks and Recreation Commission
May 21,2007
Item#5
Committee 1. Park Audit
Reports 2. Dog Park Monitor Program
3. Others
Matters from
Staff
Matters to/from
Commissioners
Adjournment. Next meeting: June 18, 2007 6:30 p.m.
Disabled Accommodation:
If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this Planning Commission Meeting,please contact the
City Offices at (707) 588-2236 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to insure arrangements for accommodation by the City. Please make sure the
Planning Department is notified as soon as possible if you have a visual impairment that requires the meeting materials be produced in another format
(Braille,audio-tape,etc.).
Page 2 of 2
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: 5/21/07
TO: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: RON BENDORFF,DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RE: REVISIONS TO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PARKLAND
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
Parkland dedications and reservations are currently referred to the Parks and Recreation
Commission ("PRC') only if there is a subdivision map review associated with the project.
This is a somewhat backwards approach in that Specific Plan areas or Planned Development
Districts may include park sites, and these plans may be approved by the City Council
without the PRC having a chance to conceptually review those park sites until the later
subdivision map stage,at which time it may be too late to provide meaningful input.
Staff has prepared amendments to the Municipal Code to address this inconsistency and to
give the PRC greater input into the planning process. The PRC received a briefing on the
amendments at its meeting of September 18,2006. In the interim,the Planning Commission
reviewed the proposed amendments on April 26, 2007 and recommended their adoption by
the City Council, which will consider them on May 22, 2007. Given that the amendments
are moving forward, Staff has prepared this memo to ensure that the PRC is aware of these
amendments.
Attached to this memo are the sections of the Municipal Code that are proposed to be
amended, showing the deleted language by strikethrough and the added language in
boldface. The following is an overview of the proposed amendments for the PRC's
reference:
Subsection 16.14.020.D.2: Specifies that land to be dedicated as parkland is to be in net
acres so that public rights-of-way are not included in the dedication calculation. (Note: This
is in response to direction from the PRC given in 2006.)
Subsection 16.14.020.J: Clarifies that credits for park and recreation improvements must
first be reviewed by the PRC.,which then makes a recommendation to the City Council.
Subsection 16.14.020.K Adds a requirement that preliminary and final development plan
and specific plan applications that include park sites must first be reviewed by the PRC,
which makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. The
amendment also clarifies that at the tentative map stage, the PRCs recommendation would
pertain to the size, layout, and configuration of the proposed park site(s), the desirability of
giving credits for park improvements, the preferred improvements to be considered, and
conformance with any applicable PRC standards,with the specific park improvements to be
considered at the final map stage.
MEMO TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
REVISIONS TO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PARK DEDICATIONS AND RESERVATIONS
Note: Currently the PRC is charged with making "recommendations to the city council, the
city manager and the recreation director regarding policies, rules and regulations relating to
the conduct of recreation centers, recreation, and public and community recreation within
the city... " (Section 2.32.040 of the Municipal Code) This section further states that "[t]he
commission shall have such other powers and duties as assigned to it by the city council."
Since it is important that the PRC's recommendation be provided to the Planning
Commission prior to its action on a development plan or a specific plan, the Council's
approval of these proposed amendments would constitute such an assignment of "other
powers and duties."
Subsection 17.06.250.B: Adds a requirement that a Final Development Plan for a Planned
Development District that includes changes to the parkland dedication plan approved at the
Preliminary Development Plan stage must be brought back before the PRC for supplemental
review and,if necessary,a supplemental recommendation to the Planning Commission.
Subsection 17.06.350.A: Adds a requirement that a Preliminary Specific Plan application be
brought before the PRC for review of any proposed parkland dedication, with the PRCs
recommendation forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council.
Subsection 17.06.370.B(1)(m): Clarifies the information that would be useful to the PRC
in a Specific Plan application that includes parkland dedication.
Subsection 17.06.380: Adds a requirement that the PRC report on the proposed parkland
dedication to the Planning Commission so that thisinformation factors into the approval of
a Specific Plan.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to call me at
(707) 588-2231.
Attachment
Page 2
Chapter 16.14 DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS
16.14.020 Park dedication.
D. Standards and Formula for Dedication of Land.
2. The amount of land to be dedicated shall be five acres of park for each one thousand
persons. This acreage shall be in net acres and shall not include any public rights-of-
way within or adjacent to the proposed park site. Unless there is evidence to the
contrary, the following criteria shall be used to estimate population: For single family
homes, the average population per dwelling unit is three and two-tenths persons per
dwelling unit; for multiple family homes, the average population per dwelling unit is two
persons per dwelling unit.
J. Credit for Park and Recreation Improvements. If the subdivider provides park and
recreation improvements to the dedicated land (other than improvements required by
subsection (E)(3)of this section)the value of the improvements shall be credited is a
credit against the required payment of fees or dedication of land required by this section.
To qualify for credit under this subsection, the subdivider must first obtain a
recommendation approval-from the parks and recreation commission and approval from
the city council for the precise improvements to be installed. Such improvements must be
commission's standards, and receive approval of cost and design by the city council.
K. Procedure.
1. Preliminary and final development plan and specific plan.
a. Parks and recreation commission recommendation. At the time of application for
a preliminary or final development plan or specific plan, the parks and
recommendation shall review and make a report to the planning commission
regarding the sizes, layout, and configuration of any proposed park dedication. The
parks and recreation commission's recommendation shall be based upon the
following:
(i) Conformance of the size, layout and configuration of any proposed parkland with
the city's general plan and city's zoning ordinance; and
(ii) Conformance with any applicable parks and recreation commission standards.
b. Planning commission and city council review. The planning commission and city
council shall review the proposed size, layout, and configuration of any proposed
park dedication and accept, reject, or modify the recommendation of the parks and
recreation commission.
2. Tentative map.
a. Parks and recreation commission recommendation. The parks and recreation
commission shall review each application for a tentative map and make a
recommendation to the planning commission,which shall include, but not be
limited to, the following:
(i) conformance of the size, layout, and configuration of any proposed parkland with
the city's general plan, any applicable specific plans, and the city's zoning
ordinance;
(ii)the desirability of giving credits for park improvements;
(iii) its preferred improvements for the proposed park; and
(iv) conformance of the proposed dedication with any applicable parks and
recreation commission standards.
b. Planning commission review. The planning commission shall forward the
recommendation of the parks and recreation commission to the city council for
review.
c. City council review. The city council shall review proposed parkland dedications
in conjunction with tentative map review in accordance with Chapter 16.10 of this
Code for major subdivisions and Chapter 16.12 of this Code for minor subdivisions.
At the time of approval of a tentative map, the city council shall determine whether
to require a dedication of land, payment of an in lieu fee, or a combination of both
and condition the tentative map accordingly. The city council shall consider the
recommendation of the parks and recreation commission,which shall include those
items listed in (2)(a) above as well as the following:
(i)The amount of land or fee or both to be required; and
(ii)the location and configuration of the dedicated land or proposed use of in-lieu
fees.
d. Time for dedication or payment.
(i) The subdivider shall dedicate the land required for dedication upon approval of
the final map.
(ii)The subdivider shall pay the required in-lieu fees after approval of the final map
and upon issuance of building permits.
3. Final Map.
a. Parks and recreation commission review. The parks and recreation commission
shall review and make a recommendation to the city engineer regarding the specific
improvements proposed to satisfy a tentative map condition related to parkland
dedication. The parks and recreation commission's recommendation shall be based
upon the following:
(i)the city's need for the specific improvements proposed;
(ii)the compatibility of the specific improvements proposed with existing city
improvements; and
(iii) conformance with any applicable parks and recreation commission standards.
1. Ccneral. When a developer submits a tentative map to the city, the submittal shall
c. The location of the dedicated land or proposed use of in lieu fees.
2. The subdivider shall pay-the required in lieu fees after approval of the final map and
L. Use of Land and Fees.
1. The land, fees, or combination of both may be used only for the purpose of developing
new or rehabilitating existing neighborhood or recreational facilities to serve the
subdivision.
2. Fees and interest collected under this section shall be committed within five years after
the payment of the fees or the issuance of building permits on one-half the lots created by
the subdivision, whichever occurs later.
M. Exemptions. This section does not apply to:
1. Subdivisions containing less than five parcels and not used for residential purposes.
However, the city shall place the following condition on the parcel map:
"If, within four years, a building permit is requested for construction of a residential
structure on one or more of the parcels, the owner of each such parcel is required to pay a
park fee in the amount set forth by city council resolution before the permit is issued."
2. Commercial or industrial subdivisions or condominium projects or stock cooperatives
which consist of the subdivision of airspace in an existing apartment building which is more
than five years old when no new dwelling units are added.
Article VII. Planned Development Zoning District
17.06.250 Procedure.
A. Preliminary Development Plan. In establishing a P-D district, a preliminary development
plan shall be prepared for the proposed P-D zoning district. -•: •. .. -:
planning commission approval.
1. Parks and recreation commission recommendation. The preliminary development
plan shall be submitted to the parks and recreation commission for a
recommendation with regards to any proposed parkland dedication. The
recommendation of the parks and recreation commission to the planning
commission shall be based upon the criteria listed in section 16.14.020(K)(1)(a) of
this code.
2. Planning Commission Approval. The planning commission will hold a public hearing
to consider the preliminary development plan, the recommendation of the parks and
recreation commission with regard to any dedicated parkland, and to determine
whether the land uses proposed and their interrelationships are generally acceptable and
consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan. The commission shall
indicate conceptual approval or disapproval of the preliminary development plan. Such
conceptual approval shall not bind the planning commission to approval of the final
development plan, which shall be subject to environmental analysis and public hearings.
B. Final Development Plan. Once a preliminary development plan has been approved by
the planning commission, a final development plan to rezone the property to P-D district
may be submitted to the city. If subdivision within the district is necessary, then a tentative
map may also be applied for at this time.
1. Parks and recreation commission review. If any changes to dedicated parkland
have been proposed since preliminary development plan approval, staff will
schedule a public hearing before the parks and recreation commission after receipt
of a complete application. The recommendation of the parks and recreation
commission to the planning commission shall be based upon the criteria listed in
section 16.14.020(K)(1)(a) of this Code.
2. Planning Commisison Approval. Ffollowing appropriate environmental review of the
plan, the planning commission shall consider the application for a final development
plan at a public hearing. After the hearing, the planning commission shall forward
any new recommendation of the parks and recreation commission with regard to
any dedicated parkland. The planning At this h wring the commission will also make a
recommendation to the city council based on a review of the environmental impacts of the
plan, the appropriateness and interrelationship of the proposed uses, any effects on traffic
circulation due to development of the plan, the quality of the suggested site plan design,
consistency with the general plan and any applicable specific plan, and other details of the
proposed district. A favorable recommendation must include the findings listed in this title
for a final development plan (see Section 17.06.260).
3. City Council Approval. At its-the city council's public hearing, the council it may
decide to approve or deny the final development plan or return the matter to the planning
commission for further evaluation. If the application for a final development plan is
approved, the property shall be rezoned as a P-D zoning district and so indicated on the
zoning map for the city.
C. A use permit shall be required prior to the construction of any phase of an approved P-
D zoning district. A use permit for any or all phases of the development may be processed
concurrently with the final development plan. It is the intent of the use permit to further
clarify the details of the development phase being considered and to ensure that each
component complies with the established provisions of the district.The use permit is
intended to refine the final development plan and implement the conditions of approval
attached to the final development plan. Use permit approval shall be required prior to final
map recordation for all projects within a P-D zoning district.
The planning commission may grant a use permit, provided that the proposed
development phase is in substantial conformance with any approved final development
plan for that property and the conditions thereof. In approving a use permit for a phase of
the P-D zoning district the planning commission may add conditions of approval, which are
consistent with the intent and provisions of an approved P-D zoning district and help to
implement that district. For P-D zoning districts containing commercial and/or industrial
components, a Master Use Permit may be approved which will generally or specifically
describe those tenants that may utilize those components.
Article VIII. Specific Plan Zoning District
17.06.350 Preliminary application--Review procedure.
A. Within thirty days of submittal, the planning and community development director, or
designee, shall respond in writing to the applicant regarding the completeness of the
preliminary application. Following initial application review, the planning and community
development director may require other documentation and information deemed
appropriate he or she deems necessary for the parks and recreation commission and
planning commission to make a recommendation to the city council regarding
conformance with the general plan.
B. Parks and recreation commission report. The application shall be submitted to
the parks and recreation commission for a report with regards to any proposed
parkland dedication. The report of the parks and recreation commission to the
planning commission shall include the criteria listed in section 16.14.020(K)(1)(a) of
this Code.
BC. Planning Commission and City Council Public Hearings. Once the preliminary
Notices. The planning commission and city council will each hold a public hearing to
receive public input on the preliminary plan. Additional public meetings and workshops
may be required if necessary to determine general plan conformance may be required as
determined by the planning and community development director.
GD. Following completion of the public meetings, but not more than ninety days following
the determination that the preliminary application is complete, the planning and community
development director or designee will inferm provide the applicant(s) and all property
owners within the SP district : - -••-• - - _ -•. - _ •••_ - - _ _ --
- - - - -•- -••••- __ •-- - _ . with a copy of the staff report and any
adopted resolutions.
GE. Preliminary application review shall not constitute any representation on the part of the
city that a specific plan will be prepared or approved for the property or that any other
application pending or otherwise will be approved. (Ord. 695§ 3, 2003)
F. Final Development Plan. Once a preliminary development plan has been
approved by the planning commission, a final development plan to rezone the
property to P-D district may be submitted to the city. If subdivision within the
district is necessary, then a tentative map may also be applied for at this time. Once
the application has been deemed complete by staff, a public hearing before the
planning commission shall be scheduled following appropriate environmental
review of the plan. The planning commission shall make any new recommendations
to the city council based on a review of the environmental impacts of the plan,the
appropriateness and interrelationship of the proposed uses, any effects on traffic
circulation due to development of the plan, the quality of the suggested site plan
design, consistency with the general plan and any applicable specific plan, and
other details of the proposed district. A favorable recommendation must include
the findings listed in this title for a final development plan (see Section 17.06.260).
At its public hearing, the city council may approve or deny the final development
plan or return the matter to the planning commission for further evaluation. If
approved,the property shall be rezoned as a P-D zoning district and so indicated on
the zoning map for the city.
17.06.360 Application--Request for development agreement.
A specific plan application may include a request that the city enter into a development
agreement with the property owner(s)or applicant for development within the specific
plan area. To the extent practicable, the development agreement application shall be
processed concurrently with the specific plan application. Provisions of this chapter may
be varied if expressly authorized through approval of a development agreement.
17.06.370 Application--Submittal.
A. Applications for a specific plan or specific plan amendment shall contain the following:
1. Completed planning application form and required fee and attachments.
2. Two copies of a preliminary title report dated within the last six months.
3. A master copy of a draft specific plan or proposed revisions to an adopted specific plan
in the case of an amendment, both in print and electronic format, if available. Additional
copies of the draft documents shall be submitted for public review purposes, as
determined by the planning and community development director.
4. A comparison of the standards and provisions of the specific plan to the standards and
provisions of the zoning ordinance.
B. The draft specific plan shall include the following, subject to the satisfaction of the
planning and community development director:
1. Text and tables providing:
a. A general description of the proposed development, including a legal description of the
property in the district.
b. A statement of the relationship of the specific plan to the general plan.
c. A boundary survey map of the area within the specific plan and a calculation of the
gross land area within the district.
d. Definitions of the land use designations (including density ranges and, in the case of
residential designation, sample product types) shown on the specific plan graphics (as
required by subsection 2 of this section).
e. A land use program in table format setting forth, by area and in total, the minimum and
maximum total dwelling units, the minimum and maximum nonresidential square footage,
and the minimum acreage for open space, public uses, and any other uses for the district
at buildout.
f. A description of each land use sub-area in terms of uses and compatibility, and the
zoning district regulations that shall apply to that sub-area to the extend not otherwise
specified in the specific plan.
g. A public facilities financing plan that explains how streets, water, wastewater, solid
waste, and parks, all meeting city standards, will be provided to the project including
quantitative data, such as population, housing units, land use acreage, engineering
calculations for projected water consumption and wastewater generation, and other data
sufficient to illustrate phasing of development and potential impact on public service
requirements. The plan must demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the city manager, that
completion of all necessary infrastructure and public facility improvements concurrently
with completion of the specific plan is economically, physically, and legally feasible. The
city manager shall base the determination of completeness by reviewing the following
components:
(1) Identification of public improvements required to complete each phase of the project
as well as the entire project in accordance with the general plan and city standards.
(2) Detailed cost analysis of required public improvements.
(3) Method of financing required public improvements.
(4) Implementation and phasing schedule correlated with project buildout.
(5) Plan for receiving approval of all regulatory agencies including proposed timeline for
submittal and approvals.
(6) Evidence of ability to complete improvements in a satisfactory and timely manner.
(Note: Pursuant to general plan policies GM-10, GM-11, and GM-12, a public facilities
plan that provides for the project's fair share of the financing for the necessary public
facilities, but does not provide for the completion of the public facilities prior to completion
of the development due to lack of contribution by other responsible parties, will be
deemed complete but will not be sufficient to receive approval as part of a specific plan
unless either one or both of the following exceptions apply:
(i)A statement of public policy considerations is adopted by the city council to allow
certain required public facilities to be deferred for a specific time period. The statement of
public policy considerations shall include findings that specific and offsetting community
goals and objectives are achieved by the project that balance not meeting the goal of
providing necessary public facilities concurrently with development. A time period shall be
specified in which the improvements must be completed. Such findings shall be
supported by substantial evidence in the record of the public hearing.
(ii) For projects subject to a development agreement, the city council may grant an
exception for streets/highways/intersections only, if it can be demonstrated that although
adequate street/highway/intersections are unable to be provided for the development at
the time occupancy is projected, such facilities will be provided within two years of the
time occupancy is projected. The determination that such facilities will be provided within
two years of the time occupancy is projected shall be based upon the approved public
facilities financing plans submitted by other projects that contribute to the need for the
street/highway/intersection improvement.).
h. Description of proposed water supply(Note: information will be used toward
determining the adequacy of water supply consistent with general plan policies PF-11
and PF-14, relating to water supply.).
i. If based on the preliminary biological assessment and mapping submitted as part of the
preliminary application, surveys are required, a complete site-specific biological
assessment of wetlands, habitat areas, and creeksides by a qualified biologist and a
proposed program for conservation/mitigation to the extent feasible. The biological
assessment shall include a survey, conducted in accordance with established California
Department of Fish and Game guidelines, for potential candidate, sensitive, or special
status species identified in the general plan (e.g., the California tiger salamander), other
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, both in breeding habitat and adjacent upland
estivation habitat, with appropriate mitigation, including avoidance and minimization
measures.
If a survey has not been completed at the time of application submittal, it shall be
completed prior to completion of a draft environmental impact report. A specific plan
application shall not be considered complete until any required surveys are complete,
except as may be modified pursuant to subsection 17.06.370C.
If surveys are determined not to be required, documentation for this determination
prepared by a city-approved biologist shall be submitted.
j. Proposed program for conservation of the natural resources along creeks and
standards for the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources where
applicable.
k. A preliminary traffic study prepared by a qualified traffic/transportation planner or
engineer and reasonable mitigation measures to mitigate traffic impacts resulting from
the development.
1. An affordable housing program showing how the proposed development will comply
with the city's inclusionary housing requirement, if applicable.
m. Other plans and programs, as may be necessary, to address general plan and city
requirements regarding traffic, natural resource conservation and management, parks
and open space (including a description of the acreage, layout, and configuration of
proposed parkland dedication), hydrology, drainage and storm water runoff.
2. Graphics showing generally:
a. Land use designations for each distinct use in the SP district(each such designated
area is hereinafter referred to as a "land use area")and in adjacent areas outside the
district.
b. Public circulation system (including street standards and cross sections, pedestrian
paths and bikeways, and linkages to adjacent properties, where appropriate).
c. Public buildings, schools, open space, and park.
d. A Preliminary Public Infrastructure Plan including the proposed location and capacity of
major infrastructure components, including wells, sewerage, water, drainage, solid waste
disposal, energy and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area
covered by the draft specific plan.
e. A map showing the natural resources as well as the opportunities and constraints of
the district(e.g., wetlands, creeks, view corridors).
f. Diagram of how the development within the area covered by the specific plan is to be
phased.
3. Standards and criteria by which development will be phased.
4. Standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources.
5. A topographic map and, if applicable, a general grading concept plan for the property,
shown at contour intervals not to exceed two feet for natural slopes over two percent or
less. For natural slopes of two percent or more, contour intervals shall not exceed five
feet.
6. Development standards, including, but not limited to, the following:
a. permitted uses,
b. conditionally permitted uses,
c. site coverage,
d.floor-area ratios,
e. setbacks,
f. building heights,
g. accessory structures,
h. private and public outdoor areas, including open space and parks,
i. parking, and
j. fencing.
7. Design guidelines, including, but not limited to, the following:
a. site guidelines.
(i) streetscape,
(ii) parking,
(iii) pedestrian connections,
(iv) landscape and street tree palette, and
(v) lighting;
b. building guidelines.
(i) porches and entries,
(ii) scale,
(iii)architectural character,
(iv) materials/colors,
(v) landscaping, and
(vi) signage.
8.A program of implementation measures, including regulations, programs, public works
projects, and financing mechanisms necessary to carry out the specific plan. In cases
where the application for a specific plan is not joined by all property owners in the district,
the implementation program may address any additional information or procedures
required for development of those properties, and may establish mechanisms for the
allocation of specific plan fees and public facility and infrastructure costs among property
owners within the district.
9. Any other information required by state law or the general plan to be included in a
specific plan.
10. Any other subjects that, in the judgement of the planning commission or city council,
are relevant to the application and are necessary and desirable for implementation of the
general plan.
C. If the property within a proposed specific plan district is owned by more than one
owner and not all owners join in the application, the planning and community
development director may modify the requirements for a draft specific plan to require, on
a site-specific basis, less detailed information regarding property owned by persons not
joining in the application.
'17.06.380 Specific Plan Approval procedure.
A. Parks and recreation commission report. Upon receipt of a complete
application, the parks and recreation commission shall consider the application at
a public hearing and report on the proposed acreage, layout, and configuration of
parkland dedication and report to the planning commission on the project's
compliance with the city's general plan requirements and any other city policies for
parkland dedication.
AB. Planning Commission Review. Following completion of environmental
documentation as required by the California Environmental Quality Act, a public hearing
shall be scheduled before the planning commission.
1. Notice. At least ten days prior to the planning commission hearing, the planning
and community development director shall cause to be mailed a notice to the applicant
and to all owners within the existing or proposed SP district and within three hundred feet
of the boundaries of the district as shown on the latest equalized property tax
assessment rolel, publish a notice to be published in a newspaper of general circulation
i
wthrz,.n the city, and post a a notice to be posted in at least three public places in the city.
In addition to the above noticing requirements and at least ten days prior to the date of
development director. The sign(s)shall be removed within seven calendar days of the
hearing.
82. Recommendation. The planning commission shall forward the report of the parks
and recreation commission to the city council and indicate by resolution, with
recommended findings (see Section 17.06.390), whether the specific plan or specific plan
amendment is recommended to the city council for approval, approval in modified form,
or disapproval. Following the planning commission's recommendation, the planning and
community development director shall forward said recommendation to the city clerk for
scheduling before the city council.
C. City Council Review. The city council shall conduct a public hearing on the specific
plan or the specific plan amendment.
1. Notice. At least ten days prior to the hearing, the deputy city clerk or planning and
community development director shall cause to be mailed a notice to the applicant and all
owners of property within three hundred feet of the boundaries of the proposed district as
shown on the latest equalized property tax assessment rolel, publish a notice to be
published-in a newspaper of general circulation,withi.,z,,,n-the ty, and post a notice to be
posted in at least three public places in the city.
B2. Approval. Approval of the specific plan or specific plan amendment shall be by
resolution. The city council may approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove any
proposed specific plan or specific plan amendment.
If the city council approves the specific plan with modifications, the applicant(o)shall
be responsible for the reprinting of the approved specific plan with all city council
approved changes and amendments. A master copy, both in print and electronic form,
and a certain number of copies, as determined by the planning and community
development director, shall be provided to the city within thirty days of the city council's
aotiee-approviag approval of the specific plan.
v01INERT Poi(
CITY ADMINISTRATION
L95.
?'Gz MEMORANDUM
CALI FORN,P
May 16, 2007
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Dan Schwarz, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Proposed Park Rule Amendments to the Municipal Code
At its March 19, 2007 meeting, the Commission provided staff with direction as to
amendments to the Municipal Code it would like to recommend to the City
Council. Staff has completed its review of these amendments and requests
further direction from the Commission. Staff consulted the City Attorney's Office
regarding the policies and concepts supporting these proposals. If it is the
direction of the Commission, staff will work with the City Attorney to draft an
ordinance that will be presented the Commission at its June meeting.
Dog Regulations
Dogs must be immediately removed from the dog park at the first sign of
aggression toward people or other dogs.
Staff is concerned that "sign of aggression" is subjective. Staff is not familiar
with a standard for this term that could serve as the regulation's basis. Does
the Commission have more definitive actions it wishes to identify as
prohibited? Also, should the rule be drafted to apply to dogs in any city park?
Recommendation : Provide direction to staff.
Owners must dispose of their dog's waste in trash receptacles immediately.
Disposal of animal waste is already required. Municipal Code Section
6.04.090 states:
A. No owner or person otherwise having an animal in his care, charge, control, custody
or possession, except a disabled person using an assistance dog, shall permit or
allow any animal to do any of the following:
Park Rules
May 16, 2007
Page 2
1. Defecate on any public street or other public property without immediately
cleaning or removing the excrement to a proper receptacle.
2. Defecate on any private property other than that of its owner without the consent
of the owner, lessee or other person in control of the private property.
B. Any person owning or otherwise having an animal in his care, charge, control,
custody or possession on any public street or other public property shall carry a tool
or device to be used for cleaning or removing animal excrement. This tool or device
shall be presented to the animal control officer upon demand. (Ord. 738 § 1 (part),
2005)
Recommendation: Direct staff to post this rule in appropriate locations.
Dogs must be licensed, current on vaccinations, and wearing ID at all times.
Staff proposes that this rule be applied to all parks, rather than only to dog
parks. Staff notes that a dog must have current vaccinations to possess a
valid license. Staff proposes adding an item to the list of rules enumerated in
Municipal Code 9.62.010 to read that it is unlawful "to be in custody or control
of a dog that does not exhibit a valid license."
Recommendation: Direct staff to include its proposed language in an
ordinance amending the Municipal Code.
All dogs six months and older must be spayed or neutered to use the dog parks.
Staff proposes that this rule be applied to all parks, rather than only to dog
parks. Staff proposes adding an item to the list of rules enumerated in
Municipal Code 9.62.010 to read that it is unlawful "to be in custody, control,
or otherwise responsible for an off-leash or unconfined dog over six months of
age that has not been spayed or neutered."
Recommendation: Direct staff to include its proposed language in an
ordinance amending the Municipal Code.
Tennis Court Regulations
It is unlawful to engage in any activity other than tennis on the tennis courts
without written permission from the Recreation Department. This includes the
use of soccer, softball, or baseballs, bicycles, skates, skateboards, animals, or
food or drink.
Staff proposes adding the first sentence to the list of rules enumerated in
Municipal Code 9.62.010. It is not necessary to codify a list of examples.
Park Rules
May 16, 2007
Page 3
The Commission may want to create a more general rule about food and
drink. An item could be added to the list of rules enumerated in Municipal
Code 9.62.010 stating that it is unlawful "to possess food or drink in any city
recreation facility where there are signs posted prohibiting such items."
Recommendation: Direct staff to include its proposed language concerning
tennis courts in an ordinance amending the Municipal Code. Direct staff to
includes its proposed language concerning food and drink in an ordinance
amending the Municipal Code.
Swimming Pool Regulations
It is unlawful to disobey the lifeguard's directions or displayed swimming pool
regulations.
This item should be added to the list of rules enumerated in Municipal Code
9.62.010. Staff proposes amending the language to read that it is unlawful "to
disregard or disobey the directives of a lifeguard, city staff member, or posted
rules while at a city swimming pool."
Recommendation: Direct staff to include its proposed language in an
ordinance amending the Municipal Code.
Field Reservations
Teams and leagues with a valid field reservation permit issued by the Recreation
Department have priority over drop-in teams. Teams and individuals who do not
posses a permit must yield the field use to those who do.
This item should be added to the list of rules enumerated in Municipal Code
9.62.010. Staff proposes amending the language to read that it is unlawful "to
deny or otherwise interfere with the use of a field or facility by an organization
or individual with a valid reservation permit issued by the Recreation
Department."
Recommendation: Direct staff to include its proposed language in an
ordinance amending the Municipal Code.
Park Rules
May 16, 2007
Page 4
Weapons
Amend current prohibition to add underlined portions. It is unlawful "to carry any
firearms, airguns, paintball markers, slingshots, or any other weapons."
Staff proposes amending the language to read that it is unlawful "to carry any
weapon, including, but not limited to, firearms, airguns, paintball markers, or
slingshots.
Recommendation: Direct staff to amend Municipal Code 9.62.010(G)
accordingly.
Rohnert Park Municipal Code
9.62.010 Unlawful acts in public parks.
It shall be unlawful for any person, entity, firm or corporation to do or commit any of the
acts enumerated below in any city park:
A. To damage,by any means whatsoever, any public property planted, placed,
located or otherwise situated in a public park.
B. To cut or remove any wood, turf, grass, soil,rock, sand or gravel or any found
object, whether above or below ground.
C. To release any livestock of any kind on park property with the exception of dogs
which shall be permitted pursuant to posted regulations or if under leash.
D. To distribute any handbills or circulars, or to post,place or erect any bills, notice,
paper or advertising device of any kind.
E. To sell or offer for sale any merchandise, article or thing whatsoever without
written permission from the city. Such permit shall be carried by the vendor at all
times that he is selling within a city park.
F. To wilfully tamper with or damage any water or gas pipes,hydrant, stopcock,
sewer, basin or other construction in any park.
G. To carry any firearms, airgun or slingshot.
H. To make or kindle a fire except in picnic stoves or other fixtures provided for that
purpose, or to camp, except in places designated as such by official action of the
city.
I. To ride or drive any horse or other animal or any motorized vehicle, cycle or
scooter elsewhere other than on the roads or drives provided for such
1. purpose, or to drive a motor vehicle in an erratic or hazardous manner on any park
roads, paths or parking area.
J. To indulge in riotous, threatening or indecent conduct, or abusive, threatening,
profane or indecent language.
K. To enter,remain, stay or loiter in the swimming pools in the public parks or the
enclosures surrounding said pools at any time when the pools are not open to the
public with a lifeguard on duty.
L. To play or engage in model airplane flying, driving of golf balls, archery,hardball
or any similar games of a hazardous nature except at such places as shall be
especially set apart for such purposes.
M. To throw or place on or in any park any paper,rubbish, garbage or refuse matter
of any kind, unless in a receptacle designed for the purpose,but no person shall
deposit household rubbish and garbage in any city park, rubbish or garbage
receptacles.
N. To possess any beverage container made of glass or to bring, carry, or transport
any beverage container made of glass into a city park. (Ord. 475 § 1, 1987; Ord.
452 § 1, 1985)
RP Municipal Code Chapter 6.02.070
G. "Dangerous animal" means an animal, except a dog assisting a public safety officer engaged
in law enforcement duties, which demonstrates any or all of the following behavior:
1. An unprovoked attack that results in serious injury to, or the death of, any person when such
person is acting lawfully;
2. An unprovoked attack that results in the death of another animal or livestock when the animal
or livestock is off the property of the owner of the attacking animal;
3. A second unprovoked attack within a thirty-six-month period on a person that requires a
defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury when the person is acting lawfully;
4. A second unprovoked attack within a thirty-six-month period on another animal or livestock that
results in serious injury when the animal or livestock is off the property of the owner of the
attacking animal;
5. A second unprovoked attack within a thirty-six-month period on any
Proposed Code for Parks: "Aggressive Behavior
Definition" as adapted from RP Municipal Code
Chapter 6.02.070 Section G.
Dogs must be immediately removed from the park at
the first sign of an unprovoked attack on any person
or another animal that causes injury or causes a
defensive action to prevent serious injury.
DRAFT
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
SKATEBOARD PARK COMMITTEE
BACKGROUND
Rohnert Park is famous for the multitude of sports activities available in its public parks but it is
one of the few cities in Sonoma County without its own skate park. At the same time, inline
skating and skateboarding is a fast-growing sport in the community and numerous citizens have
made known their desire to fill this void through personal appearances, surveys and petitions. As
a result, the Parks &Recreation Commission formed a sub-committee on 16 April 2007. The
Committee has drawn up the following statement to guide its work.
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The Committee will investigate the possibility and desirability of locating a high quality skate
facility in the City of Rohnert Park which will serve a broad range of the city's inline skaters and
skateboarders so as to promote safe and healthy sports activities for the youth of our town.
RECOMMENDATION
At the end of its investigation, the Committee will report to the Parks & Recreation Commission
with recommendations as to the following:
• Appropriate locations
• Recommended size
• General design criteria
• Funding sources
• Other issues
R0 1NERT p
CITY ADMINISTRATION
Ig!_ `-"sz MEMORANDUM
C71LIF0 RN°P
May 21, 2007
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Dan Schwarz, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Skate Park Committee Report
I have reviewed the draft "Statement of Purpose" on the Commission's May 21 ,
2007 agenda. I applaud the Commissioners for taking up this challenging issue
and devoting the necessary time to research it. At this evening's meeting, to
avoid any misunderstanding by the public, I think it would be helpful if the
Commission notes that there is an established skate park development plan.
The established plan is for a skate park to be built in the Northeast Specific Plan
Area at the development group's expense. Any recommendation advanced by
the Commission to the City Council for an alternative site and financing plan
would be analyzed by staff in comparison to the established plan.
Also, the Commission should be aware that staff is engaged in discussions with
developers about the Northeast Specific Plan Area. The Commission should
make every effort to advance any alternatives in the next 2-3 months. This
timetable should ensure that there is sufficient time for staff to review these
alternatives and seek direction from Council as to whether the Northeast Specific
Plan Area park plans should be changed.
•
R°t{NERT PARk
INTEROFFICE MEMO
�,t,� 62
From: Guy Miller, Recreation Services ManagerC l
TiEPARTMENT
To: Parks & Recreation Commission
Date: 5/17/07
Subject:Playground Renovations
The city has been awarded a grant of$208,518.00 for the "Replacement of fall
surfaces and unsafe or non-ADA compliant playground equipment at the city
parks". This grant is through the Workforce Housing Reward Program of the
California Department of Housing and Community Development. All projects for
this grant must be identified and encumbered no later than June 30, 2007 and all
funds must be requested by May 30, 2009.
This grant will fund Phase Two of the playground replacement program. Phase
One included the replacement of playground equipment at Ladybug, Caterpillar,
and Sunrise Parks. The Commission is asked at this time to select playgrounds
to be considered for renovation/replacement based on the inspections during the
2006-07 Park Audit, 2000 Playground Safety Audit, and city staff input.
Staff recommends Benicia Park, Colegio Vista Park East, and Honeybee Park as
potential sites. This is based on the age of the facilities, structural integrity, safety
violations, and usage patterns of the parks. Public Works forces have agreed that
these playgrounds should have top priority.
Benicia Park: This playground is used heavily weeknights and weekends. Its
close proximity to the baseball field provides a location for younger children to
participate in a safe environment while their older siblings play baseball. There
are numerous unresolved safety violations and a slide and a tire swing have
been removed. The perimeter fencing has also been removed due to vandalism.
Colegio Vista Park East: This playground was scheduled for replacement under
Phase I but was removed from the project due to funding constraints. It is located
in an active park with two soccer fields and two baseball fields. The slide has
been removed to clear safety violations but there are still many remaining. The
climbing structure has been damaged and poses a safety hazard.
Honeybee Park: This is one of the last remaining wooden play structures in the
city. The playground is heavily used due to its proximity to Honeybee Pool. A tire
swing has been removed and the wood is rapidly deteriorating at the base.
Numerous safety violations still exist. A poured-in-place or rubber tile fall surface
should be considered for this playground to prevent fall material from spreading
into the pool area.
Staff is requesting authorization to issue Requests for Proposals on these three
playgrounds. Playground designs will be solicited and selected based on design,
cost, and public input. Additionally, staff is requesting a portion of the grant be set
aside to fund repairs to several other playgrounds not selected for replacement.
The details of this will be presented at a future meeting.
Attached is a summary of the unresolved playground violations and general
safety requirements.
2000 PLAYAGROUND AUDIT VIOLATIONS SUMMARY
EXISTING VIOLATIONS
PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY
PLAYGROUND 1 2 3 NOTES
Alicia Park 1 0 3
Alicia Park Tot Lot
Benicia Park 13 0 6 Slide&tire swing removed
Benicia Park by B & G Club 1 0 3
Burton Mini Park 1 0 1
Carlita Mini Park 1 0 2
Caterpillar Park East 0 0 0 New equipment
Caterpillar Park West 3 0 2 Merry Go Round and swings removed
Civic Center Mini Park 2 0 3
Colegio Vista Park East 17 3 3 Slide removed
Colegio Vista West 5 0 2 Merry Go Round removed
Dorotea Park North 6 0 4 Seahorse &dolphin rockers removed
Dorotea Park South 5 1 2 Seesaw and tube slide removed
Eagle Park North 5 2 3 Spring rocker removed
Golis Park North 11 4 4
Golis Park South 15 1 8
Honeybee Park East 9 0 3
Honeybee Park West 24 2 4
Lacrosse Park 9 0 2 Slide and spring seesaw removed
Ladybug Park 0 0 0 New equipment
Lydia Park 7 2 2
Magnolia Park 34 1 2 Spring rocker, arch climber removed
Rainbow Park 24 5 3
Sunrise Park East n/a n/a n/a Scheduled for removal
Sunrise Park West 7 0 2 Wrong swing was removed
•
Examples of Priority Ratings Based on Potential to Cause Serious Injury:
Priority 1
• Swinging wheelchair platforms in an unsecured and unsupervised setting
• Merry-go-rounds (whirls) with open platform seating
• Exposed concrete footers
• Asphalt surfacing within fall zone of play equipment
• Ten foot high free standing slide without a transition platform
• Metal animal swings
• Severely worn S-hooks
• Handholds used for supporting users weight turn and move when in use
• Swings are attached to composite play structure
• Entanglement hazards at the top of slides
• Entrapment openings between metal rungs or wood members on the roof of a log
cabin climbing structure
Priority 2
• Broken bench on picnic table board
• Broken swing chain
• Worn and cracked rubber belt swing seat
• Surfacing containment barrier creates a trip hazard
• There are one belt and one bucket swing in the same swing bay
• Loose hardware
Priority 3
• Litter and debris scattered throughout the playground
• Surfacing material can be found scattered on the playground perimeter walkways
• Lack of trash receptacles
• A shady area is not provided
• Users cannot get to the playground via an accessible route
• There is no regulatory or information signage for the play area
• The pre-school tube slide diameter is 20" instead of the 23" minimum.
• Metal equipment is showing rust and paint is chipping and worn off in several areas
• Several bolts protrude below decks and platforms between 3 and 4 threads, but pass
the protrusion test gauge
• Wood components with excessive dislodgable wood treatment
Playground equipment—
■ Expected life of play equipment is 15-17 years maximum.
• Most warranties given by manufacture are 15 years.
• If a manufacturer of play equipment goes out of business and is not sold. The agency
that has equipment still in place is liable for all injuries.
Surface Material—
Since 75%of injuries are from falls to surface or onto other equipment, protective-
surfacing depths must be maintained. During my inspections I found a few concrete bases
for equipment exposed with bolts protruding upwards. At some playgrounds surface
material is adequate but needs to be raked to maintain depth under play areas. Some sand
surfaces are very compacted and should be rototilled. (Depth requirements for different
surface materials are attached).
Swings—
■ Swing structures are not to be attached to any play structures. Children running
around play structure can run into the path of a swing and become injured. Also
children can be on play structure and grab at swing chains, or can climb from play
structure onto the top of swing structure and fall. To be in compliance structure
should be removed. If this is not feasible remove closest swing to play structure and
leave farthest swing from structure.
• 3 swings in one bay are not allowed; if 2 children are swinging on the 2 outside
swings and a child runs to center swing it will be possible they would be struck trying
to cross the swing path.
• Swing spacing is important so swings will not collide with adjacent swings or support
structure. (Swing spacing dimension sheet is attached).
■ Swing seat heights from surface material after material has been leveled is a
minimum of 16" for strap seats and 24" for infant bucket seats measuring from
bottom of seat while occupied to surface material. It is recommended that infant seats
be 30" from surface to prevent older children from entering seat and becoming stuck.
• Swing chains,pivot points, "S"hooks and seats need to be closely monitored to
prevent injuries. "S"hooks must be closed to prevent more than a 0.04" gap or
closed enough to not omit a dime. Gaps larger than 0.04"are an entanglement
hazard. "S" hooks should never be reused when replacing swing seats. When
installing"S"hooks to swing seat always have top of opening to "S"hook facing
downwards towards occupant. This will aid in the prevention of entanglements. ("S"
hook examples are attached).
Play Use Zones—
Every play structure or individual piece of equipment has a play use zone under and
around the equipment. The use zone is intended to provide a safe area by separating play
equipment. (Examples of use zones are attached).
2
Protrusions—
Protrusions have the potential for serious injury or death to the user. There is a risk of
clothing entanglement,puncture of the temple, eye socket or cause internal injuries.
Protrusions can be found at all heights of play equipment and are checked with gauges.
Several protrusions were found on Spring Rockers at handles and foot pegs. Also, bolts
with more than 2 threads showing are a hazard. (See examples of and test for protrusions
and entanglement hazards).
Head Entrapments—
A head entrapment hazard is located by first seeing if a torso probe can pass threw and
opening(Torso probe measurement is 3.5 inches x 6.2 inches). If torso probe can pass
threw that means there is a chance a child's body will pass threw opening so the head
must also be able to. (Head probe is 9 inches in diameter). If head probe will not pass
threw opening we have a head entrapment hazard. Head entrapments can be found
between ladder rungs, steps, stairways, guardrails,protective barriers, platforms,
handgrips, hand rail, between platforms and equipment, and under merry-go-rounds.
Head entrapments are most common when children are 2-5 years old and when child
enters opening feet first. Note: A child that has his head entrapped can die in 2 to 3
minutes with only 3 pounds of pressure on neck.
A child was killed playing on play equipment that was in compliance. His head was
entrapped because he was wearing a bike helmet and hung himself.
Platforms—
When you have platforms that have head entrapments then platforms must be adjusted or
if not possible then protective infill must be added. If there are no head entrapments and
spacing is at proper distance between platforms you must install protective infill between
platform 48" and higher. (See deck diagram attached).
Protective Barriers and Guardrails—
Preschool-age children 2-5 years - for platforms over 20 inches but not over 30 inches
high guardrails are acceptable but a full protective barrier may be preferable for this age
group since it affords a greater degree of protection from falls. Protective barriers should
always be used for platforms over 30 inches above protective surfacing.
School-age children 5-12 years—for platforms 30 inches but not over 48"high
guardrails are acceptable, any platform over 48"high should always have a protective
barrier.
Dome Windows—
Dome windows when installed new are very strong but as they age they can become
brittle and can be broken by impact from a child's fist or foot. Check windows closely
when inspection. Windows are very flammable and can burn if ignited.
Prepared by Michael Bracewell Inspector #5986-0803
3
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
A j4iiiitr. 3
•
9,„�\ P 7�✓ /✓
"s}r •
trzi; !C.:Ili r
Track Slide
• Handle is missing. PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• If handle is reinstalled bottom of handle must be 84" or less from surface
material. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
Platforms (Northside of Track Slide)
• Coating is showing wear on edges. PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Between 2nd and 3`d platform head entrapment. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Between 3`d and 4th platform needs protective infill. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
--"'yam-
4x
`g NEMmourio
iP+ �..�_ ..
Step Ladder From Surface to Platform
• One rung and space is more than 12". PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
<,10 i
4 S1(1 ; 10,
' --
_ L
1 ;}
.
Banister Slide
• Space between platform and slide top support. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
r „...,, , ® ;..
,..,,,... „.„7,..„„, ,,
,,74 . .,,,,,,..„,„ , ., i _
.;_ 6..,.,„ ,,,, ..„,...„ r• s,
Arch Climber
• There is a gap between platform and first top bar 3". PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Arch climber rungs are space 13 `/2"— 15"not evenly space. PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Arch climber and double slide use zones are overlapping. A child could fall from
Slide to arch climber or climb from arch to slide. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
_cove" 11A5 51-E moveP
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lie. #5986-by0803
Children 5-12 years of age
9*-•
• w4,4
.->"
Double Wave Slide
• Gap between platform and bottom of slide entrance head entrapment.
PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by n Action taken
• Slide supports under wave, flat brackets very rusty. PRIORITY 2
Date of repair Completed by nn Action taken
• Slide exit to low to ground its 2".PRIORITY 2
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
R 'w oYEb
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
/ .
Chain Climber
• Space between top of chain climber and platform head entrapment. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Coating on chain cracking pinch hazard. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Chain net climber and double slide use zones are overlapping. A child could fall
off slide onto net climber or climb from net climber to slide. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
•
/ ' ��r :
a C d7Y'
Sliding Pole
• Pole is not 18" away from platform. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Pole should be 60" high from top of platform. PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
I �� "�' � � E@F Ec Iy ' 'EEC.
Corkscrew Climber
• You can shake climber it is loose. Very Hazardous. Replace rivet. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
t
Platforms on Northeast Side of Structure
• Between 2nd and top platform need infill. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Rung ladder head entrapment. Rungs are not spaced properly PRIORITY 1.
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Broken bracket that holds rung in place. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Broken bracket for hand grip at lower platform rung ladder. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
Overhead Ladder
• Protrusion on end of bar by platform. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Rung spacing for turning ladder ranges one end 9" other end 23". PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
_Fs"
t4
it
Platforms at end of Overhead Ladder (southeast)
• Top platform is over 30"high. Need guardrail 2 sides. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
( .-..
Swings
• Three swings in bay. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Swing zone overlaps play structure zone. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
Swings Cont.
• "S"hooks installed strong direction and have gaps more than 0.04". PRIORITY
1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
jam+ `'rt
•
a
Tire Swing
• Structure still in place tire has been removed. Remove structure. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Surface material
• Fine sand.
Benica Park Inspected on 10/4/00 by
Kid Builders, Iron Mountain Forge Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
Playground Signs
• Signs should be posted explaining name of park, rules, ages of children 5-12 yrs.
etc. PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Play structure should have legs marked to show surface material depth.
PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
—1
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
•r
terv,-;
•
10' Metal Slide Free Standing
• Handrail should go all the way down to first step. PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
,Sc )E N,I S (%V.) bakl'x (El>
1
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
10' Metal Slide Free Standing Cont.
• Step handrail head entrapment. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
ErLityveD
• Steps head entrapment, should be 12"to each step it is 8 '/2",towards top is closed
to make tread depth 5" should be 8". PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
ac---mvvet)
• Protective barrier at top of slide is not even a guardrail. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
(Zbv oro
• Gap between slide platform and slide. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Slide exit zone of needs to be 14', it is 12 ''/z'. PRIORITY 2
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
ittrov
• 10' slide, sand depth only 3" deep needs to be 12" deep. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
0UE'l>
2
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
*14"1.61'i 4.1 jaTA1514
,e-wcittroP r":1113 SF*:
Arch Climber
• Head entrapments between rungs. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Protrusion under by platform and side rails. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
f..
32" Wide Slide
• Sides of slide are 2 1/2 " high should be 4". PRIORITY 2
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
3
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
4
Platforms
• Head entrapments between all platform steps—6. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Hand grips to enter platform head entrapments— 15. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Between 4th, 5th, 6th platforms need infill head entrapments. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
4
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
Yy
, 4r „ fit' '4 it
Tube Slide
• Head entrapments at entrance—enclose around outside of tube. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Tube cracked at exit. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
'rr-ogio lir 1 wilrA i
l
Fireman's Pole
• Is 21”away form platform should be no more than 20"max. away. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
r,,
5
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
Fireman's Pole Cont.
• Pole should be 60" form platform to top—it is 36". PRIORITY 2
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Concrete showing at bottom of pole. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed b Action taken
IuC,.
I I tilb
rr
Protective barriers
• Head entrapments. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• End of pipe has cap that has hole. Hazard. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
6
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
Protective barriers Cont.
• Some protective caps are broken and have sharp edges. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
:1 II
-m _°
�16.�z = 1
4
Window Dome
• Very discolored can not see threw it,brittle?PRIORITY 2
Date of repair . Completed by Action taken
7
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
'��,
•
Spiral Slide
• Top dome has 2 holes at entrance to slide. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
A/o w f n.c(LC 1.1s t¢/9 2 A &16-&5
• Dome's rubber head protector is cracked and hard. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Missing bolt holding dome down. PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
8
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
I
Free Standing Swin2 Set— 2 bays
• Remove one swing per bay. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Replace chain more than V2 worn. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Metal bent under seat. Hazard. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
CLX
• "S"hooks more than 0.04" gap. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Pivot area worn or bolt for pivot worn(check). PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
9
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
4r z
41111*
t
Free Standing Infant Swine Set—2 bays, bucket seats 5
• "S" hooks more than 0.04" gaps. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
CUA.
• Remove one swing where there are 3 in bay. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
CC-6)141-61)
• Space all swings properly. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
10
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
Horizontal Ladder
• Rung ladder spacing more than 12". PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Height of horizontal ladder is 90"max. height should be 84". PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
1% / � t
f I
Dome Climber
• Entanglement hazards at all connections of pipe (diamond plate circles).
PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
11
Colegio Vista East Inspected on 10/18/00 by
Miracle Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Gametime
Children 5-12 years of age
Surface Material
• Fine sand.
• Play structure sand depths in some places 0", need 9". PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
R CAC- b /Wool F5172_
• Infant swings need 9". PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Concrete showing at bottom of fire pole 0" of sand. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Playground Signs
• Signs should be posted explaining name of park, rules, ages of children 5-12
years, etc. PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Play structure should have legs marked to show surface material depth.
PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
12
Honeybee Park(West) Audit completed 9/21/00 by
Wooden Play Structure Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
•yy.
1 1
,n
Swings
• "S"hooks facing wrong way. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
C CCJS-
• Three swings at bay. Remove one. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Cc.~>
1
Honeybee Park(West) Audit completed 9/21/00 by
Wooden Play Structure Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
Swings Cont.
• Swing structure is attached to another(remove swings). They cannot be attached
to any other structure. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Swings are crossing use zone of spiral slide (very dangerous). PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Note—clevis pins should not be mounted how they have been. Do not use them if
gap is more than 0.04" pinch point. We have been using them on swings.
PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Remove swings and structure. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
2
Honeybee Park(West) Audit completed 9/21/00 by
Wooden Play Structure Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
. m
Tire Swing
• Tire swing has already been removed. Remove structure. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
1
, , ., i ....17.,77:". ' '
_„, -,,,,..„ ....., ,,,,..„...„.
Guardrails
• All guardrails are head entrapments. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
3
Honeybee Park(West) Audit completed 9/21/00 by
Wooden Play Structure Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
Guardrails Cont.
• Spaces between a lot of 6"x 6"posts are head entrapments. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Platforms Slide
• Space between platform levels head entrapment. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• 4 x 6 boards redwood S4S are showing dry rot and some severely split.
PRIROITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Ladder needs one more rung. Install rungs starting 12" from platform down.
PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
4
Honeybee Park(West) Audit completed 9/21/00 by
Wooden Play Structure Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
Platforms Slide Cont.
• Round inset stainless nut protectors are loose tighten nuts we have pinch and
entanglement hazards. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
CCC r&6tj
• Hand grips up stairs to slide platform loose. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Protrusion on bolt. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Bolts
• Check all bolts, several have become loose in wood because of wood shrinkage.
PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
5
Honeybee Park(West) Audit completed 9/21/00 by
Wooden Play Structure Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
a 3
Spiral Slide
• Guardrail needs to be protective barrier. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Gap on top of spiral slide needs to be rounded cap more than 30°. PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Slide exit zone is dangerous it is sharing with swing zone. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Slide 6 X 6 posts below surface are showing sings of dry rot. (some areas 2"
deep). PRIORITY 2
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
6
Honeybee Park(West) Audit completed 9/21/00 by
Wooden Play Structure Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
Spiral Slide Cont.
• Bolt protrusions under slide (bolt threads). PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Sharp edge on outside edge towards bottom of slide. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• 9 1" I , /
# . .
_z
Straight Slide
• Gap between slide and platform. PRIORITY 2
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Slide platform guardrail spacing is not safe head entrapment. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
7
Honeybee Park(West) Audit completed 9/21/00 by
Wooden Play Structure Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
Straight Slide Cont.
• Space between post and platform by slide less than 5/8"pinch point.
PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Slide guardrail needs enclosure like guardrail to keep kids from climbing outside
slide. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Platform showing rot(very rough edges). PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Protrusions on bolts. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
8
Honeybee Park(West) Audit completed 9/21/00 by
Wooden Play Structure Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
t.1'f 1. w FT r
;"/;','-:. ..;,..-0 Mr', -i:,,,
"k t FAR ix i rlil , :-‘ `,
s
Arch Climber
• Spacing between rungs in 14". Required to be 12". PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• At top of arch between to rung and platform head entrapment(should be level
with platform). PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Head entrapment between 6"x 6"posts top of platform. PRIORITY 1
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
Surface Material
• Fine sand.
9
Honeybee Park(West) Audit completed 9/21/00 by
Wooden Play Structure Mike Bracewell Lic. #5986-0803
Children 5-12 years of age
Playground Signs
• Signs should be posted explaining name of park, rules, ages of children 5-12
years, etc. PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
• Play structure should have legs marked to show surface material depth.
PRIORITY 3
Date of repair Completed by Action taken
10