Loading...
2005/04/18 Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Packet �-` CITY OF ROHNERT PARK PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION Monday, April 18, 2005 7:30 p.m. Rohnert Park City Offices 6750 Commerce Boulevard AGENDA 7:30 I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll CalL:__� � 0 Bird Black CiButler 0 Griffin Pf Hansen 0 Rogers Et/Stevens IV. Approval of Minutes March 21, 2005 Commission Meeting V. Report on the Posting of the Meeting Agenda VI. Unscheduled Public Appearances/Public Comment (Please fill out a Speaker Card prior to speaking) 7:45 VII. Old Business A. Recreation Element of Specific Plan Areas a. Answer to Questions Submitted to Planning Department b. Approval of Specific Plan Recreation and Park Elements B. Playground Equipment Replacement a. Priority of Renovations b. Public Input c. Presentation of Designs—May 16 C. Roberts Lake Dog Park VIII. New Business �,cp ©‘ er"'9 A. 2005-2006 Capital OA*Program B. 2005-06 Budget IX. Staff Reports A. Department Highlights—March Page 1 City of Rohnert Park Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda—April 18, 2005 X. Commission Committee Reports ^t A. Golf Course B. Parks Master Plan& Community Fields Citizen Advisory XI. Matters From/For Commissioners Adjournment to a regular meeting scheduled on Monday, May 16, 2005, in City Council Chambers at the Rohnert Park City Hall, 6750 Commerce Boulevard, at 7:30 p.m. DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this Parks &Recreation Commission meeting, please contact the Recreation Department at (707) 588-3456 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation. Please make sure the Recreation Director's office is notified as soon as possible ifyou have a visual impairment that requires the meeting materials to be produced in another format. Page 2 • iiik) McDonough Holland&Allen Pc R. Attorneys at Law Memorandum Gabrielle P.Whelan Attorney at Law Oakland Office 510.273.8780 tel 510.839,9104 lax gwhelan®mhalaw.corn DATE April 15,2005 TO Rohnert Park Parks &Recreation Commission FROM Gabrielle P.Whelan gij RE Parkland Dedication Requirements Ron Bendorff has asked that I provide you with the following summary of state Sacramento and local law regarding parkland dedication requirements. As you know,the state 555 Capitol Mall Quimby Act as well as the City's Municipal Code govern this issue. A summary of 9th FlpCA oor Sacramento thoseprovisions follows: 95814-4692 tel 916.444.3900 QuimbyAct moll free 800.403.3900 �� fax 916,444.8334 Oakland The "Quimby Act",located at Government Code section 66477, permits a city by 1901 Harrison Street ordinance to require the dedication of land or payment of a park fee instead,or both, 9th Floor forpark or recreational purposes as a condition to the roval of a tentative mapor Oakland CA P PP 94612-3501 parcel map. tel 510.273.8780 toll free 800.339.3030 fax 510.839.9104 Government code section 66477(b) sets forth the park acreage that can be 1!uha City required: 422 Century Park Drive Suite A Yucity c' ... [t]he dedication of land,or the payment of fees, or 95991-5729 both,shall not exceed the proportionate amount tel 530.674.9761 necessarytorovide three acres ofpark area per 1,000 fax 530:671.0990p persons ...,unless the amount of existing neighborhood www.mhalaw.com and community park area ... exceeds that limit,in which case the legislative body may adopt the calculated amount as a higher standard not to exceed five acres per 1,000 persons ..." The City of Rohnert Park has adopted this higher"five acres per 1,000 persons" standard. (Municipal Code section 16.30.030.) Section 66477(i) provides that improvements to dedicated parkland are to be" ... a credit against the payment of fees or dedication of land required by the ordinance." 819529v1 80078/0012 MalikMcDonough Holland&Allen Pc Attorneys at Law Rohnert Park Parks &Recreation Commission April 15, 2005 Page 2 Rohnert Park Municipal Code Chapter 16.30 of the Municipal code governs parkland dedication. Municipal Code section 16.30.040(B)sets forth the formula for determining the amount of land to be dedicated. Municipal Code section 16.30.040(C)requires that street improvements and fencing be provided contiguous to the dedicated parkland. Developers receive credit—if approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council at the time of tentative or parcel map approval --against required parkland dedication. (Municipal Code section 16.30.100.) I understand that the Parks and Recreation Commission is currently reviewing proposed parks for consistency with the city's General Plan. Thus, at this juncture, the Parks and Recreation Commission's determination should be limited to whether the proposed parks conform with the City's adopted General Plan. In connection with the approval of parcel and tentative maps,the Parks and Recreation Commission will have the opportunity to report to the City Council on the sufficiency of acreage and r1 improvements of proposed parks. (Municipal Code section 1630.110.) Please contact me at 707/588-2214 or"gwhelan@rpcity.org" if I can provide you with any additional information. cc: Ron Bendorff,Senior Planner 819529v1 80018/0012 Parkland Comparison s :agN a:x __� t'S ser *gt a: - x +v, "'* ,,.� iiiNg £ ire, - - ;AN `se -s� '. c E t :;a 'q�s `' `mss'` # t nN -*4ia*t, ' 3�x "rte'' 0 i 20.00 - "x' r� „„,Via, w r' �q: "+ ,• - , t ar '�t: r^ w` ', a "A- - k `i - - Sot- �� 'baa `r 7:t a g + Oxy. 't s`` � .yam x� 'j� � s 15.00 � r�. •Required Acres ami ' � � ■Offered Acres _ Q � � ', Vi- � iwl,:.."-51t:11;-,;, F10 00 - % i I. 3 .r �'f i amgym--_ t 4 " " _+ 9 T. ' - 'x 5 ''W' fiZ * x ;� < , _ • * x ,500 � ivmv , i b ' 3 Y 0.00 � ""- ,x=g „_ ` :' .. ;. ,1 ... _ 14,:ic-ti-,::,2.3,,oioit,,,_N::igvoxizitbt,-t-ztto-"Aiatm,:ttioatz.uqn-NA;_:: :.,r_::::-.:.-_f,..-_iz_=,:::::;: .-_---.:-. -r-, _: 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 �\ Housing Units INTEROFFICE MEMO Aox„ER:P!;t To: Parks and Recreation Commission '9 ` Subject: Questions Submitted to Planning re: Specific Plan Areas ,o.a� From: Guy Miller, Recreation Services Manager. Date: 4/12/04 Enclosed are questions submitted to Senior Planner Ron Bendorff concerning the three Specific Plan Areas currently being considered for evaluation by the Commission. These questions were submitted by Commissioners Black and Butler. Senior Planner Bendorff has responded to each question. Please review these questions and the responses to prepare for the discussion on the April 18 meeting. Senior Planner Bendorff will be in attendance at this meeting. r ' '� ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PARKS and RECREATIONAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLANS GENERAL • The General Plan defines 4 basic kinds of Open Space, Parks, and Public Facilities. One of these is spaces for outdoor recreation. It is my understanding that this Commission is only considering the proposed open space/parks for active use and credits for outdoor recreation. Is that correct?_If this is correct,then this Commission is not charged with considering the setbacks and adjacent spaces along the creeks (preservation of natural resources,flood hazards etc.) as meeting the requirements of the GP- correct? ANSWER: The Commission is only being asked to make a general consistency statement about the proposed park sites and their relationship to the General Plan. The question of credits cannot be considered now, as there are no park plans on the table, only the "conceptual"locations shown in the Specific Plans. Staffprovided the information regarding credits as an introduction to the process for the Commission's reference. The Commission is also not charged with considering creek setbacks as park sites as the General Plan does not provide for this. • Bike and Pedestrian Paths (see Figure 4.4-1 in GP) are mostly addressed in the "Transportation"section of the General Plan. If they are already required as transportation elements, should they also be eligible to fulfill Park and Recreation credits? If so,please explain. ANSWER: It is not unusual for there to be overlaps in a General Plan. For example,Policy OS-15, which is in the Open Space,Parks, and Public Facilities Element, specifically directs the City to "integrate citywide plans for bicycle and pedestrian paths with park plans"and Table 5.2-2 identifies the "University District Linear Park"and the "North Eastside Linear Park"as park sites that should be credited towards fulfilling each development's park needs Had the General Plan not identified these two linear parks as valid park sites, this would likely not be the case. It should also be understood that typically setbacks along the sides of major arterials such as Snyder Lane are 14 feet, rather than the 32 feet called for in the General Plan. • Developments are required to have setbacks from the roads and creek paths. The depth of the setbacks seems to vary by different Zoning Ordinances, fish& game requirements and within the GP. If minimum setbacks are already required along streets & creeks,why should those minimum requirements be applied to"Park &Recreational" credits? Can just park and recreational development of these setbacks (ex. Par courses, special bike paths (not along streets as alternative transportation),landscaping etc.) be given credit excluding the land? ANSWER: As noted above, creek setbacks are not being considered as fulfilling any park site needs, even if they do provide some recreational benefits. The linear park along Snyder Lane is the only street side setback acreage that is to be allowed credit as a park site, as the General Plan specifically allows this and to change this would require a General Plan Amendment It should also be understood that the Zoning Ordinance standards for developments do not speak to such roadway setbacks, only to setbacks required from a property line to a building on the site. • The Commission is asked to approve the space, placement and credits toward development of the P&R elements of each of the specific plans. How can we approve the credit toward development when we do not know what improvements will be made in each of these spaces? As P&R Commissioners, shouldn't we also be considering the improvements relative to the existing city facilities? ANSWER: We are not at that stage yet As noted above, the individual park site plans will be before the Commission in the future and recommendations regarding the awarding of improvement credits would be made at that time. Again, the Commission is only being asked to determine the proposed park sites'consistency with what the General Plan shows for development within the three Specific Plan Areas under review. • Wouldn't it be wise to delay a decision of what will be actually put into these recreational spaces until the actual needs of the city are determined by the newly formed Long Range Park Planning Ad Hoc Committee? ANSWER: No. It is Staffs understanding that the Ad Hoc Committee was not formed to reassess the General Plan as it relates to future park sites but to ---� determine how those park sites should be developed Again, that is a later stage in this process. • If it is determined by the Ad Hoc Parks Long Range Planning committee that what the city really needs is something that would be shared by the entire town, would it be possible for a developer to offer some financial resources outside of their specific plan development? Ex. Indoor pool at the Sports Center in lieu of some developed park land within their plan. ANSWER: It is possible, but we must consider what is on the table now, which is the proposed Specific Plan park sites and their consistency with the General Plan. This could be discussed when the Specific Plans begin to develop and we have specific park site plans and potential credits to consider. • Would it be possible to have the City Attorney present at our meeting to explain the extent to which the City can count or not count land proposed by developers for park dedication requirements? ANSWER: I will check with the Deputy City Attorney and request, at the least, a memo to the Commission which would address this question. • Aren't EIRS being prepared for each of these developments? Shouldn't the P&R Commission wait to review the EIR before making any fmal determinations? '1 ANSWER: The EIRs are not required to be approved for the Commission to determine whether or not the proposed park sites are consistent with the General Plan, nor would they provide much direction on this matter. They should be approved by the time that the individual park plans are submitted for City review, however NORTH EAST • According to the General Plan(pg. 3-11),under CD-7, is says, "Provide an approximately 32ft wide linear park/parkway(within the currently acquired right-of- way,which is not needed for street parking: see Chap. 4 Transportation) along the eastern edge of Snyder Lane as a neighborhood amenity and to provide primarily unobstructed views of the ridgeline. • Set back all development on the eastside at least 20ft. from the edge of the linear parkway...Etc... This seems to imply that the City(County?) already owns or otherwise has control of this "linear parkway". If the City already controls this property(or owns it) and if a minimum setback is required,why should we give Park and Recreational credit to the developer? Chap.4 regarding transportation along Snyder at this location describes the plans for pedestrian and bike paths within this parkway... If these paths are to be considered"recreational",why are they detailed under transportation? Were the setbacks/landscaped areas along the properties on the west side of Snyder given"Park/Rec. credits when they were built out? ANSWER: It is Staff's understanding that we do not control the east side of Snyder Lane at present and it is still within the County of Sonoma's jurisdiction,so this is an error in the General Plan text. Again, the General Plan directs that we credit this strip as parkland, so that would be consistent with the General Plan (and the purpose of this discussion is to determine that the park sites proposed in the Specific Plan Areas are consistent with the General Plan.) Bike paths are typically shown within both the park and transportation elements of a General Plan as they function as both recreational and transportation features of a city(Le. they are used for people who jog, bicycle, rollerblade, etc.for recreation and those who also rely on these paths to allow them to circulate from one area to another.) The properties on the west side of Snyder were already built when the General Plan was approved and Staff is not aware of any credits being given for their setbacks to be considered as `parklands"in the past. It should be understood that the east side strip will be wider than what is on the west side,so the General Plan allows for it to be considered a park site. Furthermore, the 20 foot setback mentioned is for any primary buildings on the individual lots to be developed to the east of the 32 foot linear park, so primary buildings are intended to be at least 52 feet away from the Snyder Lane roadway. • The plan shows a park of approx. 8 acres, yet the developer is only offering 4.5 or so. How will RP assure that the rest of the park eventually be acquired and developed as a park as needed? What if the property owner where the additional park area is shown doesn't develop with the other owners? ANSWER: The initial phase of the Northeast Specific Plan is only intended to include 559 units, with the eventual buildout to contain 1,063 units. Under State Law, the City must show a nexus(direct connection) between the dedication of parklands and a development's expected population. At the 2.62 persons/unit ratio used in the General Plan, the 559 initial units would generate a potential 1,464 residents. At a ratio of 5 acres/1000 residents, this population's parkland need would be an estimated 7.3 acres. The initial 4.5 acres of the central park site and the linear park shown in the General Plan, which is roughly 4.5 acres in size, would technically exceed the area's initial park site needs. In Staff's understanding, the other portion of the park site can only be required of the other "half'of the Northeast Plan when it develop& This will be further discussed prior to the approval of the Specific Plan and an appropriate approach developed This should not delay the Commission's determination of General Plan consistency, however. • Is moving the 4.5+ acres to be congruent w/the"Linear Parkway" (currently LDR)possible(as shown in GP-Fig.5.2-1)? This would give a more usable space of land for park development and it would also offer a less obstructed view of the ridgeline which is a fundamental element of the GP in that area. ANSWER: This can certainly be discussed with the Specific Plan proponent, if the Commission wishes this to be its recommendation. In Staffs opinion, locating it towards the center, as shown in the Draft Specific Plan is preferable, as it would be more accessible to a greater number of resident& It should be noted that the 32- foot linear park and the minimum 20 foot setback to the main building for any lot --� beyond this should preserve a reasonable view to the ridgeline. UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SPECIFIC PLAN • I was not part of the Commission when this plan was presented in November. I need more information about the plan before I can make any informed decisions regarding this site plan. Would it be possible to meet with the developer the next time he/she is in town? ANSWER: The developer's contact information was provided to Commissioner Black, as Staff was not sure when he would be in town for such a meeting. SOUTH EAST SPECIFIC PLAN • If the parks are also proposed to be used for storm water retention part of the year,should full credit be given for the park and not setup solely for park use? (This question may apply to other specific plans also) ANSWER: The proposed park is intended to include a detention area, which would hold water during a large storm event for a short period of time, as opposed to a retention basin that is designed to hold water for a longer period A detention area in a park is typically a large, slightly depressed area, such as a soccer field, in which storm water can accumulate during peak rains and then be filtered naturally into the ground. It is not intended to be a noticeable swale or a more conventional storage pons. This is an approach taken by other cities in their parks and it seems to be a good creative way of providing some storm water detention without having to build the aforementioned swales and ponds which can be less attractive and a waste of space for most of the year. Since the primary use of the detention area is for park purposes, it should be credited as parklands How does the land allocated for the new parks in the three specific plan areas compare to what's been allocated to existing city parks? ANSWER: To assess this, Staff looked at four existing parks in four distinct neighborhoods: Alicia Park, Golis Park, Lady Bug Park, and Magnolia Park The population of each park's surrounding neighborhood was estimated using each neighborhood's existing housing inventory and the General Plan's blanket ratio of 2.62 persons per unit to determine population. The park sites were then assessed based on that estimated population as follows: Alicia Park(4.8 acres in size) Housing inventory in "A"Section: 2003 units Population at 2.62 persons per unit = 5,248 residents Parkland need at 5 acres/1,000 residents = 26.24 acres, or 21.44 acres under need Existing ratio: 5 acres/5,456 residents Golis Park(12.54 acres in size) Housing inventory in "G"Section: 859 units Population at 2.62 persons per unit = 2,251 residents Parkland need at 5 acres/1,000 residents = 11.26 acres, or 1.28 acres over need Existing ratio: 5 acres/900 residents Lady Buz Park(5.0 acres in size) Housing inventory in "L"Section: 749 units Population at 2.62 persons per unit = 1,962 residents Parkland need at 5 acres/1,000 residents = 9.81 acres, or 4.81 acres under need Existing ratio: 5 acres/1,960 residents Mauinolia Park(18.17 acres in size) Housing inventory in "M"Section: 1,718 units Population at 2.62 persons per unit = 4,501 residents Parkland need at 5 acres/1,000 residents = 22.5 acres, or 4.33 acres under need Existing ratio: 5 acres/1,240 residents �-a SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS Northeast Plan (14.91 acres total) Proposed housing inventory: 1,063 units Population at 2.62 persons per unit = 2,785 residents Parkland need at 5 acres/1,000 residents = 13.93 acres, or.98 acres over need Proposed ratio: 5 acres/934 residents Southeast Plan (5.8 acres in size) Proposed housing inventory: 499 units Population at 2.62 persons per unit = 1,307 residents Parkland need at 5 acres/1,000 residents = 6.54 acres, or.74 acres under need Proposed ratio: 5 acres/1,127 residents University District(16.46 acres in size) Proposed housing inventory: 1,610 units Population at 2.62 persons per unit = 4,218 residents Parkland need at 5 acres/1,000 residents = 21.09 acres, or 4.63 acres under need Proposed ratio: 5 acres/1,281 residents As can be seen from the above analysis, the existing parks within the City do not strictly follow a set ratio of parkland acreage to residents and the proposed park sites within the Specific Plan Areas do more closely meet the 5 acres/1,000 residents ratio. Additional question from Commissioner Griffin: Since there is a required amount of acreage to be set aside for city parks, does staff feel that sufficient acreage is being allowed for each park in all three plans? In Staff's opinion, the park sites proposed in the three Specific Plan Areas are consistent with the City's General Plan. The details of what components would be in each site (e.g. playground equipment, landscaping, etc.) will be determined at a later stage, as well as the eligibility of the developers for any improvement, private open space, or other credits. 4/14/05 M-Hink., McDonough Holland&Allen ec IL Attorneys at Law Memorandum Gabrielle P.Whelan Attorney at Law Oakland Office 510.273.8780 tel 510.839,9104 fax • gwhelan@mhalaw.com DATE April 15, 2005 TO Rohnert Park Parks&Recreation Commission FROM Gabrielle P.Whelan RE Parkland Dedication,Requirements Ron Bendorff has asked that I provide you with the following summary of state Sacramento and local law regarding parkland dedication requirements. As you know,the state 555 Capitol Mall Quimby Act as well as the City's Municipal Code govern this issue. A summary of 9th Floor Sacramento CA those provisions follows: 95814-4692 tel 916.444.3900 Quimb Act toll free 800,403.3900 y ""\ fax 916.444.8334 Oakland The "Quimby Act",located at Government Code section 66477,permits a city by 1901 Harrison Street ordinance to require the dedication of land or payment of a park fee instead,or both, 9th Floc` forpark or recreational purposes as a condition to the approval of a tentative mapor Oakland ca PrP PP 94612-3501 parcel map. tel 510.273.8780 toll free 800.339.3030 fax 510.839.9104 Government code section 66477(b)sets forth the park acreage that can be Yuba Cityrequired: 422 Century Park Drive Suite A ... [tjhe dedication of land,or the payment of fees,or Yuba city CA P y 95991-5729 both,shall not exceed the proportionate amount tel 530.674.9761 necessary to provtde three acres of park area per 1,000fax 3 .671.0934 persons ...,unless the amount of existing neighborhood www.mhalaw.com and community park area ... exceeds that limit, in which case the legislative body may adopt the calculated amount as a higher standard not to exceed five acres per 1,000 persons ..." The City of Rohnert Park has adopted this higher"five acres per 1,000 persons" standard. (Municipal Code section 16.30.030.) Section 66477(i) provides that improvements to dedicated parkland are to be" ... a credit against the payment of fees or dedication of land required by the ordinance." 819529v1 80078/0012 McDonough Holland&Allen Pc Attorneys at Law Rohnert Park Parks &Recreation Commission April 15, 2005 Page 2 Rohnert Park Municipal Code Chapter 16.30 of the Municipal code governs parkland dedication. Municipal Code section 16.30.040(B) sets forth the formula for determining the amount of land to be dedicated. Municipal Code section 16.30.040(C)requires that street improvements and fencing be provided contiguous to the dedicated parkland. Developers receive credit—if approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council at the time of tentative or parcel map approval --against required parkland dedication. (Municipal Code section 16.30.100.) I understand that the Parks and Recreation Commission is currently reviewing proposed parks for consistency with the city's General Plan. Thus, at this juncture, the Parks and Recreation Commission's determination should be limited to whether the proposed parks conform with the City's adopted General Plan. In connection with the approval of parcel and tentative maps, the Parks and Recreation Commission will have the opportunity to report to the City Council on the sufficiency of acreage and improvements of proposed parks. (Municipal Code section 16.30.110.) Please contact me at 707/588-2214 or"gwhelan@rpcity.org" if I can provide you with any additional information. cc: Ron Bendorff,Senior Planner 819529v1 80078/0012 n CITY OF ROHNERT PARK PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN Rohnert Park has a growing future. People who come here will want and need places, parks and programs that foster growth and development of the total human being by providing for personal development,positive relationships, engagement with their community, and physical and psychological safety. The human assets of Rohnert Park are rich and diverse, and include the people who live, learn,work and play in the Friendly City. Three fundamental elements of a model for human growth and development are at the center of all Parks and Recreation activities in Rohnert Park. These elements are: 1. Promote Human Growth and Development by providing for Engagement, Safety, Relationships, and Personal Development 2. Protect the City's Green Infrastructure 3. Optimizing the Experience of Living through People, Parks and Programs. The Recreation Department uses this model as the foundation for program development and service delivery. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan serves as the"road map" for future parks and recreation services in Rohnert Park. The benefits of Parks and Recreation are numerous: BENEFITS OF PARKS AND RECREATION PERSONAL ENVIRONMENTAL • Recreation programs develop skills • Parks and recreation services in,art, crafts, sports, and other significantly contribute to the positive leisure activities quality of life • Parks and recreation facilities cool, • Trees remove carbon dioxide, calm, and bring people together produce oxygen, filter out pollution • Parks provide multitude of and conserve energy recreational experiences • Natural and open space areas and • Community Centers offer wellness interpretive information educate on programs promoting personal health environmental values and resources and fitness • Essential :green infrastructure" • Access to natural beauty reduces preserved through enhancement and stress protection of biodiversity and natural resources a ,- i SOCIAL ECONOMIC • After-school programs provide for • Well maintained parks, open space children and teens and recreation amenities enhance • Community buildings are gathering livability and increase property places and sources of civic values information • "Green infrastructure" is • • Programs celebrate diversity marketable and attracts both • Schools,businesses, community businesses and residents based organizations, and other • Multitude of programs and facilities public organizations are keeps people of all ages in the City collaborated with • Work and volunteer opportunities • Civic involvement possible through provided community meetings, volunteer • People visit throughout the region opportunities, and neighborhood and spend money here activities and events • Workers use outdoor spaces and • Volunteers,neighbors and recreation facilities for self renewal participants provide"eyes on"to and enhancing productivity enhance safety • Employment opportunities provided for youth • Recreation programs provide physical activity which reduces health costs The Rohnert Park General Plan(item OS-10) calls for the preparation of a Parks, Recreation, and Open Space(PROS)Master Plan as the implementing tool for General Plan park and recreation policies and proposals. The city should ensure that the plan includes phasing and priority acquisitions. As part of the Plan development, explore financing mechanisms, including methods for upfront acquisition and development of priority parklands and fields. The PROS Master Plan will cover several topics related to park and recreational open space, such as:precise location of parks and financial planning to improve undeveloped park land and trails, maintain existing facilities, develop new trails, and acquire land for new parks. The PROS Master will also establish standards and identify funding for both specific park facilities and City-owned, non park open space areas, such as street medians and open space buffers. ''1 GOALS FOR THE PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN The Parks and Recreation Master Plan should consider the many opportunities and challenges facing the city in times of growth. The primary goals should be to: • Demonstrate the many essential personal, social, environmental, and economic benefits provided by Parks and Recreation Services; • Establish policies to guide decision making by City staff and officials regarding Parks and Recreation Services; and • Chart the growth, direction, priorities and agenda for the development of new facilities and programs Objectives of these goals may include: • Explore acquisition of land for the Community Fields Park and make site development recommendations • Balance existing and proposed parks and facilities with ability to maintain these facilities to high standards • Explore new funding sources for parks and recreation services • Project future maintenance costs of existing and proposed park and recreation facilities • Evaluate recreational facilities proposed for Specific Plan Areas and incorporate these facilities and designs into a city-wide plan • Increase uses at facilities with declining use such as swimming pools and golf courses • Evaluate existing program contracts and consider submittal for competitive bid • Consider the affects of competing with private business and entities for delivering sports and fitness related programs • Keep the City's greenways and parks healthy and expanding • Bring more special events to Rohnert Park • Establish a large group picnic area • Establish a large community playground area • Meet users expectations for quality maintenance of safe, clean,usable parks • Provide additional miles of bikeways and trails • Make better access and use of the City's creek areas • Enhance the walkability of the city • Provide opportunities for public art and outdoor performance venues • Provide more ways to get public information about services with expanded outreach to at-risk and ethnic communities • Expand opportunities for volunteers and City-Community-School partnerships • Continue investments in priority services and access for persona with disabilities, seniors and youth • Improve safety at parks and recreation programs and venues • Develop and maintain new and improved neighborhood, community and regional parks • Incorporate urban plazas and pocket parks into infill areas where development densities are planned to increase • Build special interest facilities at new or existing parks (such as community gardens, skateboard and BMX parks, and dog parks) • Build new, expand or update existing Community Centers • Preserve more public open space with passive recreation uses • Rehabilitate infrastructure in the City's parks and recreation system to protect the capital investment • Provide additional safe and clean restrooms at parks and recreation facilities • Use technology for greater management efficiency and public access to information and department services • Protect and enhance natural resources • Develop and invest in employees dedicated to excellent public service RpHNERT pgRA. Recreation Department City of Rohnert Park 5401 Snyder Lane ,49 19 , 62 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 707-588-3456 FAX 707-588-3444 CALIFOIL' April 8, 2005 Dear PROS Committee Member, Our first Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Community Fields Citizens Advisory Committee meeting is behind us. Eight committee members were in attendance and the discussion was creative and productive. One of the first items of discussion was what do we do about the painfully long name of the committee. All in attendance agreed that adopting an acronym from Rohnert Park's General Plan, "PROS"or Parks, Recreation, and Open Space,made sense and was a lot easier on the tongue. Henceforth, you are all members of the PROS Committee. Most of the discussion at our first meeting centered on the scope of the committee's responsibility and the ability of the committee to produce a finished product. Sample plans were distributed and discussed. Many in attendance felt that the production of a professional quality, comprehensive, Parks and Recreation Master Plan was beyond the ability of the committee to produce with limited time and resources available. Some felt that the creation of a less detailed and more focused plan might be within the ability of the committee. The committee will request further clarification from the City Council. The make up of committee was discussed and it was agreed that a committee chair(or chairs) should be selected. It was also agreed on that any communication from the committee to City Council should be done through the committee chair(s). The selection of the chair will be made at the next meeting. Our next meeting will be Wednesday, April 13 at 7:30pm at the Community Center. An agenda is enclosed. Youi truly,• 7 Guy NIiIler Recreation Services Manager City of Rohnert Park Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Committee Wednesday, April 13, 2005, 7:30 pm Rohnert Park Community Center Meeting Room#1 AGENDA Appointed Committee Members Nick Aronis Lynne Morrow Michael Bird (P&R Commission) Cindy Peterson Daniel Blanquie Lee Rosichan Tim Danesi Chuck Rogers (P&R Commission) Thomas Hansen(P&R Commission) Linda Sanders Susan Adams(Plan. Commission) Pam Stafford(Plan. Commission) 1. Introduction of Committee Members 2. Committee structure a. Selection of Chair(s) 3. Introduction to Rohnert Park's Park System [Guy Miller] 4. Representative Park Use a. Magnolia Park—a year's use i. Schedule ii. Users iii. Maintenance Costs iv. Problems b. Additional types of facilities i. Baseball ii. Football iii. Swimming Pools iv. Community Centers v. Callinan Sports &Fitness Center vi. Dog Parks 5. Current/Future Projects a. CEP Program(Capital Improvement Program) b. Playground Renovations c. Rohnert Bark Park d. Burton Ave Recreation Center Renovation Phase II e. Community Center ADA Assessment f. Pending or Unfunded Grant Projects g. Specific Plan Areas h. Community Fields Park i. Southwest Public Safety Building 6. Discussion regarding scope of plan and City Council direction 7. Date/Time of next meeting AoxNERTPARN'— CAPITALPROGRAM IMPROVEMENT 19 —�`• 62 itn r' The Rohnert Park Capital Improvement CA lfFOANIA Program has identified six parks in which City of Rohnert Park new playground equipment is needed to meet current playground safety standards. Playground Equipment These improvements have been funded in Replacercent Program the 04-05 budget. d These parks include the following: Colegio Vista Park • Colegio Vista Park AMOUNT FUNDED.$80,000 :7' trf "'ova GENERAL COMMENTS ■ Civic Center Mini-Park •Located next El Camino HS(formerly 1', it 4 . Richard Crane School)and El Colegio , f� r 1 g;pg� ■ Sunrise Park School(Special Ed) ` s Park includes 2 soccer f elds and 2 f • Ladybug Parkbaseball fields r • Cielo Mini-park „e„, , e Park is well used by young families. - • Caterpillar Park ,,,,,,,,t,444,4jr:;,.43,,,:i,re,,ii ,.,, �; 1 Civic Center Mini-park Sunrise Park AMOUNT FUNDED:$40,000 ^ • �� GENERAL Amount Funded:COMMENTS$115,000 , `� GENERAL COMMENTS Located across from the :-1,44,:t.,,,,,er'1.--:11''''' + + Community Centerigt Located at corner of San Simeon and • Includes softball,soccer *„ r' Civic Center Drives '. fields,basketball court, •Park is shared with homeowners � r '' tennis courts. association of nearby condo � . ., ,�r,;. Park is heavily used. development. n' • Suggest new playground be -Playground is small and serves a limited .„,:-.4-..,r.::,...-*...., �.;. - �.. • moved to location of existing ' ,.. population. �"` £ tennis backboard. i ,...:- . Sunrise Park, cont. Ladybug Park Not enough room for new equipment at Amount Funded:$76,000.Originally funded for existing site due to new regulations .' $144,000.Funding for this amount is no longer ' , • Tennis wall is in bad shape and is a target ::_ f v available. '"t, at for graffiti.It is also rotting away. �' � , ,� „k t�.# t. GENERAL COMMENTS: • Propose to remove old equipment ��<<- ' 1' "^ Park is located nett to LaFiesta School I • Remove tennis wall 2 ' ` " x �. Park and adjacent school property include ' • Build new structure on site of tennis wall Mu Ladybug Pool,Ladybug Recreation Center, '" — Safe,fenced area for children * "''" -' baseball and soccer fields,and tennis courts. — Will be the only lighted playground in RP i City Council has expressed ar desire to move the ' d _ playground to an area of better visibility.It is �, r� f:, • Construct new picnic area where old play t .g .,k. currently located behind the Recreation Center structure was LaFiesta School has two playground structures y that have public access.Consideration of this ^" ;, " needs to be taken when designing this play 4.'j 2 Ladybug Park, cont. Cielo Mini-Park • Amount Funded:$120,000.This amount is ,« r funding both Cielo and Caterpillar park in the , e CIP. • It has been suggested to move this play area to a location south .1 .. GENERAL COMMENTS c " of the swimming pool adjacent to - - •• This mini-park is located off Cielo Circle the tennis courts.This will provide directly behind University Square Shopping ;; better light lines from the street. Center ` " -- • There is currently no play apparatus located in f this park. f `s'.< • There is an area with a concrete perimeter curb that looks as if it once contained a play r i. tat .,.«..,.«., ,.«. area. • The mini-park consists of a basketball court _` ` and a bench. Caterpillar Park Design Phase 4 Vie. • Amounted Funded:$120,000 combined with Cielo Mini-Park !Cr?' '' • We currently have design proposals for: GENERAL COMMENTS ; ■ Caterpillar Park • Located off Circle Drive. ' • Two separate playgrounds in this park. —2 Options • East area has a modern play structure. tliatsliN Ladybug Park • West area needs to be replaced. —2 options ■ Sunrise Park r, —3 options We will be exploring options for the other three parks I ,, Ott , in the near future. 3 Caterpillar Park Design Process • Preliminary design proposals • Preliminary discussions with Recreation and "`^''�.iiruP% ' 5 Parks Commission • Solicit neighborhood input through public " —, , '_ hearings or community meetings eexcou �\ U .ll ,) t ; • Selection of design by Parks and Recreation �J A _ We,MINE 7 Commission r - -T • Final Recommendation to City Council (` '�4.... `�' � �� Caterpillar park Sunrise Park Design Options •Option"A"and"B"consists of the same play structure but differentOPTION "A & B" shade structures over the sand play area.Option"A"has a 12'x12' shade structure,and Option"B"has O - • I • Located at proposed new site a lesser quality 8'x8'shade r m �=� structure. _ ' • Play structures are suitable for children -Cost of Option"A"is$54,000 ",d ages 2-5 and 5-12 -Cost of Option"B"is$42,000 �� ® Budget $120,000(includes Cielo I' m .°r c • Estimated cost: $96,000 - $110,000 Park) _ `� � _ • Budget: $115,000 4 Sunrise Park Sunrise Park Option B Option A - - i° l r �L 4r ("V\ors tigav Y 41117 J �.s y�mr�Fr. ar e� ) .� l �" �L 03 _ I aid+ \ IIMELIINJ ' Ft15' N-141;l, � ( " II �f;'fes ,311 ('r.' 'k - J ` Q�- r 7)\ .3q=Gamro VIWIIi .., / --j— Al.— 1" .•1• I- Sunrise Park Ladybug Park Option C(existing site) Option A •Due to limited space the options are ® 1—_ -, giliaalimited at the existing site. -- i , PS )Il� c •Option"A"consists of a large Spacenet '�,t,� • and swings. "O .� 74 Th "'•m" a L •There is room to include a large play ��e %S®� F-------€::::ystructure if the swings are not included. �♦� e g.�� This option is delineated in Option"B". �? ���"I� / ISM • Cost Option"A"=$32,000 w� \` ` ) Q S •Cost Option"B"=$69,000 ,.( . •Budget:$76,000 __ i pi-ill- -,. 5 Ladybug Park Thank You! Option B '`moo 1 � L_ itIM r1_ C c ....rte II `/ —,_ v_� ) o W 3's` `=7 --�n 1 m = Stay Tuned for More . . . 6 INTEROFFICE MEMO winker tike To: Carl Leivo, City Manager 9 r:^4,," CC: Parks and Recreation Commission, Sandy Lipitz (A41FO Rr0 Subject: Recreation Department Monthly Highlights From: Guy Miller, Recreation Services Manager Date: April 13, 2005 ADMINISTRATION •Our First Annual Recreation Celebration is being planned. This event showcases the many classes and activities the Recreation Department has to offer. The offerings include: Callinan Sports Center open house, the First Annual Clay Games (pottery), demonstrations from our contract instructors including belly dancing, basketry, martial arts, soccer, golf, and dog training. Entertainment including: the Community Band, Vintage Choir, line dancing, clowns, Senior Variety Show, theatrical performances, and the RP Chorale. There will be an art display and local author's book signing. Games,prizes,party jumps and food will be available for all. The entire event is free. Join us on May 7 from 10:00 am until 4:00 pm at the Community Center Campus,rain or shine! •Plans are being considered for the renovation of six playgrounds. Preliminary plans and cost estimates are being prepared. These playgrounds include Colegio Vista Park, Civic Center Mini-Park, Sunrise Park, Ladybug Park(renovation and relocation), Ciello mini-Park, and Caterpillar Park. These renovations were approved in the 2004-05 CIP Budget. Community meeting will be held for each park as plans are presented. •The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space(PROS) Committee held its first meeting on April 6. This committee is charged with creating a comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan for the city. The first meeting consisted of getting to know the committee and fact-finding. A Committee Chair will be appointed at the next meeting and an introduction to our parks system will be presented on April 13. •The Parks and Recreation Golf Course Oversight Committee met. The committee drafted a letter to the City Council with concerns about changes to the lease with CourseCo. •The Spring/Summer Activity Guide was published. Over one hundred different classes will be offered during the next few months. The Guide also has a comprehensive list of swimming pool activities and summer camp opportunities. YOUTH PROGRAMS •Swinging Spring Day Camp was held at Ladybug Recreation the week of March 28-April 1. We had over 30 campers enrolled, and they enjoyed sports, games, cooking projects,movies, arts & crafts and special events. •Youth Basketball concluded its nine-week session with a skills and awards ceremony on March 18. The kids competed in free throw contests and dribbling Page 1 of 3 relay races. All participants were given trophies, certificates and a special "Team Award." The participants are looking forward to being involved in future basketball programs through our Department. SENIOR PROGRAMS •Our Center has joined The Senior Network, Inc. The Senior Network, Inc (TSN), a communications organization dedicated to the development and distribution of information and education materials to mature Americans through an exclusive nationwide network of senior facilities. A board has been mounted in the hallway between the Drop in and the Activity Room. Valuable information will be posted on this board, and will be update monthly. •This was the month we scheduled a Casino trip to Thunder Valley. Thunder Valley is operated by the same group that will be operating the Casino in our community. The Casino was very impressive. We had a group of folks (48) looking forward to seeing this Casino for the first time. Profit was...$485.80. •The Used Clothing Sale was held Saturday, March 12th. We did not get a lot of clothing donations; however the profit after expenses was $196.50. •AARP Tax Service continued to offer free tax services at our Center. The volunteers collected an additional $594.00 in donations from folks who had their taxes prepared by this group. The AARP volunteers donated the money to the Senior Center. •Martha scheduled a Day Trip to San Francisco for a private tour of City Hall and lunch at the City Hall Café. Fourteen seniors signed up for the trip. Profit...$79.00. •We had our first new fund raiser created by, and staffed by our Fund Raiser Committee. The Ice Cream Social was held from 1:OOp.m to 3:OOp.m on Friday, March 25t. We had a good turn out, even though we did not realize it was Good Friday when the event was scheduled. Profit after expenses...$143.60. •We held a fund raiser to raffle off Brunch for two at Latitude. The winning ticket was drawn on the 3 Denise Wallace was our winner. She was thrilled. She said she has never won anything before. Profit...$116.00. •Another advertiser was added to our newsletter. Adobe Creek Funeral Home paid $150.00 to advertise. AQUATICS •Honeybee Pool is open for the season. Lap Swim, SCUBA, RCHS Swim Team, Piranha Swim Team, Masters are all being offered at this time. •We offered our Lifeguarding Course during Spring Break. The enrollment was quite low, which is potentially bad news for the staffing of the pools this summer. As of this time only about 2/3 of last year's staff have indicated they will return. We may experience a significant shortage of staff for this year. Page 2 of 3 CALLINAN SPORTS & FITNESS CENTER •Membership sales for March were$36,372. This is identical to the same month last year. YTD sales are$223,900 for 2005 compared to $209,700 in 2004. We feel the strong sales can be attributed to an improvement in the economy and the purchase of the new cardio equipment. •We were host to a Laguna High School basketball tournament. •Our Nautilus weight equipment is beginning to show signs of age. We had our first frame failure and had to replace a major part. Page 3 of 3 • INTER - OFFICE MEMO TO: Carl Leivo FROM: Vicki A. Wilkerson City Manager _ Recreation Supervisor RE: Senior Center Quarterly Report DATE: April 12, 2005 tMtt*ttt***tMifltfetlr**!tf******t**t***t**t*******t***t**t*************************tt*ttt The following is a re-cap of acitivites which have occurred at the Senior Center for the fourth quarter(January through March) of the fiscal year 2004-2005 Number of groups/activities: 2005 2004 Department (each counted once) 207 125 Non-department(counted each use) 169 173 Attendance: Department 17,341 17,261 Non-department 4,826 4,371 Total 22,167 21,632 Fees Collected: Senior Center Programs* $12,731.06 $8,112.50 Senior Center Rentals $6,169.26 $4,938.10 Total $18,800.31 $13,050.60 Registrations Processed:, 117 No#'s available Transportation: Sunshine Bus 263 161 Excursions 129 187 *Breakdown of Accounts: Classes $1,135.31 $1,211.40 Activities $5,689.46 $2,833.50 Excursions $1,158.00 $952.00 Donations $2,674.72 $1,008.80 Sunshine Bus $597.00 $552.75 Scholarship $3.00 $9.00 Newsletter Subscriptions $172.00 $170.50 Advertising $1,210.00 $375.00 Drop-In $188.30 $251.65 Craft Shoppe $448.00 $295.00 Miscellaneous $484.52 $416.80 Volunteer Hours: 05 Senior Center- 2,255 Craft Shoppe - 590 Dining Site - 403 04 1947 578.5 409 0 CO Ln O O M 0000 O IC) U) 000000t-- . ,-. 000N OOOO O t- t` <n O Ln O O N 0 COo oOLU ' N ' ' O OCMMCLnN O DNCOr LnU) t� V 4N 04 D (OCLVtVON, NCbLUm [rM LorNO co "t coN (O NLn ) mg e- N- M (OVON M N 0N N M N .2u9-t03(./3,E9-14- ER ER 69 ER ER ER ER ER ER 69 ER ER d E469-e36.36,369-W- -6 0 V C N- V' 0 0 e- 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 O O O O Ln d- N Ca) . M N O O CO 000000 000000 0000N .4- (.° O MCAt` OOCO 666464 OLt) COOU d0 C) N- NN- NN- (O N O N N (O O M (O N Ln Ln O O) CO .1t M O) t7 M d . r C) M Ln N (O 4t u' Ci d- C) CON V' M CDNt- ML N- U. M N V N CDCO - 004 (fl 4' C N. 4 N Ln CO N .- cO ) C 00 0) N N 0 LC N CO M O ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER 69 EA ER ER ER 69 ER EA p ER 69 ER ER ER ER ER w ` r+ LO (a a) >" S C M _O CO ,7) .;)- O CA N- t� vt O O e- O O e- >_ O N N ) 0 e- et '.t ` C ,� M N M COd0 (O ' V o ti N N ' LC Y O r' 'it >. o N La d W m O N V N DV ' M ) N 't N Ct- N Ln Ln O - m Ln C ,t ti h (O O CNWM0 CO W (CNM NNN MCO Ln O NMNNOjLNnM N ,- LnONr r M U) wClL O O it wNZ N .C) dnM OrN OM _ ONooOO W et A M O n O 0 Oaof - N MM p0) CNm � r e- rN OO (O wO C O O p a) " ZN of Ln Ln O .-- erMM 4- O O N e* MNM CO 00 tT (O O N N M Q O 01 N N e- N • O O CD N O O O N 00 O O O O O O O O Ln L p 0 0 0 O CO O O O 0 O O O O t- Ln N _C C Q O N O (O Ln Ln 4 O O . O . . Ln LA ..- O t ' CO O -tCS) 00 O m L[) O) O) an Ln v M M CA (O (� p -.11 ,- (0_ ,- m r Ln Ln N O t� 0 .4' 10MN m N 7 f\ r N - O Ct N, - O - o Q r- C O 0 EE6EEER EEEEEEEEEE0')-C9-69-69-69-69-69- .c0 fEEER ELN V OOO m OOOOOO Ooo O o O OOO LOON(Y E' O0 ,4- 00 ) 000 O O 0 N000 No (0 a t .1-76 0 O N N (O O Lf) M 666 " 6 O O yiii ,:rO N N ' N v CO Y Ua U "0 Cb rt 0) CA r L NMNe- e- .1: (O to O r N N Ln (A Or _LL O (O A (D Mr.-- C-- 0 N- t� O O ONLnU .LCMN .- O ,- e- t N CO NNM a--. H ER ER ER RERT ER69RERERm ER69ERERERR ERERRERERERR N C _ t O) , O t— O C m 2, .- �Y (O Ln N- O O a) O O O) C) E O m O r- t- O O O e- N 00 Ln M Ln L[) 7 Q O C C C') O L() N OO U r w O y..1 y 0 T' T- (fl (O M O) (O (O O 0 M M O O t• o O h a' C Ln N O Qt` N (O N- OCe- Np M (OLCO N OQm C O L .- M Cb )Nr- .- (O e- Cm00 NNC O O CN CC m- l9 c7 Z ii crn `'h R N CC 0 N L d v (p CO O (MON 0 O m m r v r " N- M O O ,t O O _} et (D M Ln l) (O N- co o .� O d. O d' ~ 0 O p .4. :, i\-A) (7) EmN `) M O N 0 �t E Z Z O O O LU M r 0 0 0 (O LU M N t- M 00t- 00r,- ' d O r CO MCO L_ r O N '68 St 7 Z o o CO o C OO O E * O •cC hE * -6 > O C c . 2 U co ^. ` U m h E L., C U m (0 •O C) - c Q) O (� U U p to to m y Z E O .�_ O co U) N _ 'D C tD ( C) m ', E ami E m (u o C)) - U ca (I) o U) � Q F= J E O LLQ m EU- 0 m � c J j � U rn Em o L c EgmEg .T - H o Y c cQ cam .6 -0r7) _I (0 L- ° a ci (n (o a o mct, -0 (3 c F- o .5 'E c m H rn c 0 E o c oto - omS R U m J (n iO +, : a. d m Cn M 1- Q m 2 J I- cc U Q U U U 0 LL o1 N- M.* O O O O O O N N 0 00000 0 0 0 00000 M M O 00000 O O O MO u-56 O0 f— (O a) 4 c1' LU N O ' V O 6) N tf) � O i _ c 'a O O O I� 6) N c- d- a) M N_ cN- Nc M N to NO O `- CO(O N t (D N OD to O N- M M M N M O N UN NN r N N M d 69-60Z-4 (A 69-U069(.0606400 EA d3 Efl(A 69(A(R (.9-64 0 U OOr O 00 00 ,1- 0 0 00000 00 hv. OO M O top OOto O O 00000 OU) ti) ) tcoo 00o6) N- 0 r ' N (O '�I r ,,- a) OW toN- 1.66 t` ..4- co LU C 0 M C0 (O O M 00 LO —4—W LI- 01 (O O) N M d' C) N 6) M O) M (6 (O f- r N- N d• Q N M M M M N V ' 6) 0O) N (46- e- 0 C 69 EA fR 69 69(A 69 69 ER 69 fR 69 EA 69(A 69 EA VY (A 69 0 L !a a) L tC = Tin6' 89 a0 ct 0 (0 (O a0 0 O I- r M 'o MNti MW t0 N U O O 03 1() N LO N. tof- to �t LU t(7 M d C _M 0. cO r r O LL L O N ZN O) N IX. 0 Nt(f CO. MN LoLN 00 MO0 Ocol 0) OOL � M MC) (6O o � N u0m ..0 .4 L. - - cm Cr e-- ace,Cp Z N h O 'o • u) O NQ) 0 1-6 ., ee,�r::�� 1..1.. ,.wa .��t�,„r ?. "�a_a ` ;:. �` a......- a$ a .,e . � .:: N �_:' _°.: •4 Y�.n');.. :3 t` O N7 0 0000 N N O 0 000 O 00 C to 00 , O O O O O "1—1. -co 0 ( 0 O op Y O CO O (O O 4 N rt 6) ' N r 0 O ' 6) O 6) ' 00 MO , o p O N C to O to CO NW ON f- CO N- to 6) to CUEfit (� p y 0 0 ' ti • 00 N 0 M mm r M N W -tm ��y N V N �- M C) C r LP) r N M N N O a V 1 y O r N h 69 EA(R 0 69 EA 6,0(A EA 69 69 EA • 69 69(A 69(A 69(R EA(ACO i L) O a CD O OO 7y O C O CD 00 O OO O CM 1:30 OOOOO OO a.'E NwNVPQCa .tt. ' N O) y O N- M 8 r 150-0- N O O M0 O (19 - LLO 6a - O ,..co - Oo CMto (Dt- LOW NU N L L N N (O Co' .0 -- O N Mt,: (VU E _ V69 6969(A(A62 EA69EAA / (A - (A9N O O E Z a) C O c) E 7 a) O ° .c c-7.) U w o0 M06 CO C O co N 7 f` r f- (O (O N OMI O M N to N f` ON- CC r 700 co 77 p) CO .:1- 'ct NN M M C C +, N 00 N 0) MM 0 -0 -t, o L y f6 O O Z M d U O r , M N N- .Cm M MO N O N- W M CA 6 O LO W M o _MLO M ~ N- LU o torr OCN N00 w3 10N : 0 LLZ ow C -0 J cii m o 2 h co O 00. O CO aa C OL O 0 'p O •- O f6 C i-E O O tp U L E * a) @ L C .(7) .E In O Q) +m. E E U o h E m to - (/) V) C) N U E L a) C = cl-_ 4) N O 7Oio YO m O �Omm OZaa LL — Q oaO NZ o3" YO a sCD (Yn YE a o o— ) aa . o 7 >' n n 3EN0,. 0a) Uo -o OL O . m0 O, 19 Cn 0 yCLU h N 'O Q .-- N N CC d� E N>- n ° _1 ,c U 0 0 0 O o J (a .O ('-6 'a C C) o F- , 0 6 4-) E °) E = ac) I-- o S a O d ~ t c C) 0 o- a.O 0 0 0 C)) = (a 0 0 0 O- O >- • M Uu) Q) F- ZZ Zoo Z < ODUIO F- * QQmI � 2O) � (1) 00