2006/05/30 City Council Agenda PacketCity of Rohnert Park* 6750 Commerce Boulevsrd*Rohnert Park, California 94928
Phone: (707)S -2227*FAX::(707)5882274*VMBe00ww:rpdtyocg:
ROINERT PARK CITY CO CII;
SPECIAL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
3:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING- Call to Order
Roll Coll (Breeze Flores Mackenzie Vdak-Martinez Smith
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
COUNCIL WILL MEET IN CLOSED SESSION PRIOR TO .THE
SCHEDULED SPECIAL MEETING TO CONSIDER:
Litigation. matters - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -ANTICIPATED LMGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of §54946.9 (1 potential case)
3:30 p.m.
Special Session - Reconvene
Mayor's Report on Closed iSession (G.C. 54957.1)
Unscheduled public appearances:
For public comment -on agenda items if unable to speak at the scheduled time, or items not listed
on the agenda (limited to 3-5 minutes per person, or allocation of time based on number of
speaker car&submitted; notld exceed a 30 minute'lotal time limit) [G.C.54954.3(a))
PLEASE`FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING-
BUDGET
PEAKING
BUDGET WORD SESSION: ---- --.
t. Budget Overview for FY 2006-07
Is Council discussion/direction/action
2. Department of Public Safety - FY 2006-07 Budget
Council discussion/direction/action
ADJOURNMENT no later than 5:00 p.m.
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other
person to assistyou while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City Offices at
707) 588-2227 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation by
the City. Please matte sure the City Manager's office is notified as soon as possible if you have a visual ,.
impairment requiring meeting materials'to be produced in another format (Braille; audiotape, etc.)
This agenda has been .posted in accordance with State Law, The Brown Act
1H-h:agen&a 053006 AGETibA-SPgCLAL RPCity Council
I
CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER CARD .-(D
Date:
Name.
Address:
Phone:
TOPIC:
Brief Summary of Comments:
13
See Reverse —>
Board
Ann Hancock, President
John Garn, Secretary
Elizabeth Carothers Herron,
Treasurer
Lawrence Jaffe, Director
Martha Kowalick, Director
BIG VISION, BOLD ACTION
Advisors
Jane Bender, Mayor,
City of Santa Rosa
Ernie Carpenter,
Former County Supervisor
Kimberly Clement, Attorney
Michael Friedenberg,
Real Estate Broker
Mike Sandler, Coordinator,
Community Gean Water Institute
Alan Strachan, Developer
Science and Technical Advisors
Fred Euphrat, Ph.D.
Dorothy Freidel, Ph.D.
Edward C. Myers, M.S.Ch.E.
Edwin Orrett, P.E.
John
SwYtinRosenblum,
P
Zeno Swtink, Ph.D.. WI L t t L
Alexandra von Meier, Ph.D.
Mathis Wackernagel, Ph.D.
Joel Woodhull, Ph.D.
The mission of the Climate Protection Campaign is to create a positi ve future for our children and all life by inspiring action
in response to the climate crisis We advance practical, science -based solutions for significant greenhouse gas reductions.
707 237-2696 • P.O. Box 529, Graton, CA 95444 www:climateprotectioncampaign.org
To be successful, a new business venture requires a strategic business plan. Similarly, for Sonoma
County to achieve',its'25% communitywide emission reduction goal set by all Sonoma cities and the
County last year,*a strategic business plan is required. Producing the Community Climate Action Plan
corresponds with Milestone Three of Cities for Climate Protection, the program Sonoma's nine cities
and the County, pledged by resolution to follow.
Milestones: 1. Inventory 2. Target 3. Plan 4. Implement 5. Track progress
Track One: Completed Completed
6,831 1,500 1.2%
Internal muni. operations 2003 2005
1.2%
Healdsburg 10,722
Track Two: Complete Completed We are here.
9,500 7.4%
Communitywide 2004 2005
6:3%
Santa Rosa 147,595
The Climate Protection Campaign proposes partnership with local governments and agencies to
continue Sonoma County's national leadership. Creating a Community Climate Action Plan will align
and mobilize the community to protect the climate, implement cost effective solutions for local
governments and the community as a whole, and inspire others around the nation.
To create the plan, the.Campaign proposes a public process that runs from July 1, 2006, to June 30,
2007. The proposed total budget is $128,000. Funds will go toward public outreach, identification and
convening of community representatives, and analyses of the technical, economic, policy, and
implementation solutions for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Partners Population I Amount Share
County of Sonoma 150,565 29,000 22.7%
Cloverdale 6,831 1,500 1.2%
Cotati 6,471 1,500 1.2%
Healdsburg 10,722 2,000 1.6%
Petaluma 54,548 9,500 7.4%
Rohnert Park 42,236 8,000 6:3%
Santa Rosa 147,595 29,000 22.7%
Sebastopol 7,774 1,500 1.2%
Sonoma City 9,128 1,500 1.2%
Windsor 22,744 4,500 3.5%
Water Agency 5,000 3.9%
SCTA 5,000 3.9%
SCWMA 5,000 3.9%
Private donors 25,000 19.5%
TOTAL 128,000
Figures from 2000 U.S. census data
2 Unincorporated area - -
To date, the Campaign has secured $20,000 from private donors for the Community Climate Action Plan.
Hauff, Jud
From: Smith, Tim
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 7:38 AM council: x
To: Donley, Steve Miscellaneous
CommunicationsCc: Hauff, Judy; Lidster, Beth 10,6
Subject: FW: AB32 support letters needed soon Agenda
Copy to:
Attachments: AB 32 Support Letter may 0706.doc I copy to:
AB 32 Support
Luer may 0706....
Let's place this matter on the agenda for May 23rd. Thanks, Tim
Original Message -----
From: An^ nHancoc.k [mailto:ahancock@pair.comj
Sent: -Sunday, May 67, 2006 10:16 PM
To: Gait Pardini-Plass; Bob Jehn; Janet Orchard; Mayor Mike McGuire; Tim Smith; Gary Plass; Jane Bender; Sam
Pierce; Sarah Gumey; Larry Bamett; Doug McKesson; Deb Fudge; Sam Salmon; Smith, Tim; Randy Poole; Kiergan
Pegg
Cc: David Glass; Pam Torliatt
Subject: AB32 support letters needed soon
Dear Gail, Bob, Janet, Mike, Gary, Tim, Vicki, Jane, Sam, Sarah, Lary, Doug, Deb, Sam, Tim, Randy, and Kiergan -
UNow is the time to show our Sonoma County climate protection muscle.
AZb-N
The State Legislatureis considering a milestone bill, AB32. You may have already received requests for support letters
from Assemblymembe Pavley, the bill's author, and ICLEI. So far, only Petaluma's letter has been received. Have any
of you already sent in a letter?
Below is the sample letter for your convenience, and below that is an(article about AB32.
LXAB 32 Is jointly authored by Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez and Assemblymember Pavley, author of AB1493, the bill
at required a 30% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions for automobiles and light-duty trucks.
32 complements and put into statute the climate protection executive order that Govemor Schwarzenegger signed last
ar.
Your support for climate protection has a huge impact. Sonoma County cities supported AB1493, and soon nine other
states will adopt Califomia's Clean Car standards. Your support for AB32 could have the same nationwide impact.
Let's make this another 100% show of support from Sonoma County.
For more information, please contact Adrienne Alvord @ Adrienne.Alvord c@asm.ca.gov.
Please let me know your response as well as anyway we can support you in sending in your letter.
Thank you.
Ann
DATE, 2006
The Honorable Fran Pavley
State Capitol, Room 3120
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: AB 32 (Pavley) — Support
Dear Assembly Member Pavley,
On behalf of XX, we are writing to express our support for AB 32.
Establishing concrete limits on the state's global warming pollution, and developing a mandatory reporting system to
track progress towards the limits, are essential to secure the state's economic prosperity, protect public health and the
environment.
California is the world's twelfth largest emitter of global warming pollution. Califomia's leadership could have a real
impact in curbing global warming, while giving the state a competitive advantage in the fast-growing clean energy
market.
Unless action is taken soon, experts say global warming is expected to threaten Califomia's economy and environment,
causing worse air quality, increased disease outbreaks and heat -related deaths in some areas, a rise in sea level, and a
loss of mountain snowpack and more frequent droughts that will increase the threat of water shortages and wildfire,
among other problems.
There are many actions California can take to tackle global warming.
Investments in pollution -cutting strategies such as energy efficiency, clean energy, cleaner cars and fuels, improved
transit, smart growth, and water conservation will enable the state to cut emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
Economists have found that meet this pollution limit will provide tens of thousands of new jobs and save families and
businesses billions of dollars by 2020. And by acting soon to limit global warming pollution, Califomia can provide a
clear market signal to spur innovation and drive new investments in clean, efficient solutions, creating new job
opportunities and enabling the state to lead the global market for advanced energy technologies.
XX commends you for your leadership In addressing global warming and securing Califomia's competitiveness in the
worldwide clean energy market.
Sincerely,
Bipartisan plans look to cut greenhouse gas; State could be the first to force industry to reduce emissions linked to global
warming.
hftp://edison.fp.factiva.com/viewarticle.asp?AN=162498
Chris Bowman and Edle Lau
895 words
10:41 am, 04/05/2006
The Sacramento Bee(Intemal Content)
April 4, 2006 -- California would become the first state to require power plants and other heavy industry to reduce
emissions linked to global warming under bipartisan plans released Monday.
Recommendations from Republican Gov. Amold Schwarzenegger's environmental advisers and a companion bill
introduced by Democratic legislators would require a 10 percent cut in current levels of climate -altering gases by 2020.
Ca'ifomia industries are leery of, if not outright opposed to, a mandatory emissions cap. The state Chamber of
Commerce argues that such action should be taken at the federal level rather than state by state.
Theproposals, applauded by environmentalists, would require power companies, fuel refineries, oil and gas miners,
cement manufacturers and owners of landfills to regularly report emissions of carbon dioxide, the principal "greenhouse
gas," so named because of its heat -trapping effect in the atmosphere.
The measures do not prescribe precisely how industries should make the cuts.
The governor's advisers recommended a cap -and -trade approach that would allow companies that more than meet the
ceilings on global warming pollution to sell emission credits to those that underperform.
Such an incentive -based strategy, combined with the energy savings from cleaner-buming engines, would ensure that
the targets would be met, said Alan C. Lloyd, chairman of the 18 -member Climate Action Team.
What's good for the environment has been good for the bottom line," said Lloyd, a former secretary of environmental
protection under Schwarzenegger.
The advisory group dropped an earlier recommendation that the state levy a tax on gasoline and diesel to finance
research into fossil fuel alternatives - an idea Schwarzenegger rejected.
The emissions cap is the strongest and most controversial of the advisory group's 48 recommendations, contained in a
1,300 -page report, available at www.climatechange.ca.gov
Terry Tamminen, the governor's special adviser on energy and the environment, called the strategies to combat global
warming the "boldest and most aggressive" of any state or nation.
Part of the reduction would come from measures already adopted, including California's pioneering taw requiring auto
manufacturers to cut carbon dioxide emissions. Automakers are seeking a court order blocking the law, and the Bush
administration is trying to pre-empt the restriction through proposed federal fuel economy standards.
Release of the climate action report was timed to coincide with introduction of legislation that would mandate a limit on
carbon dioxide emissions.
Assembly Bill 32 and the climate action report are designed to cant' out the first step of Schwarzenegger's pledge Iasi
June to set firm targets to reduce the state's contribution to climate change, beginning in 2010.
7owmeny scientists say some of the effects of global climate change already are occurring in California, including earlier
lts, shifts in wildlife habitat and more frequent episodes of extreme weather and wildfire.
Awareness on the issue is rising at all levels of government. Today, the Sacramento City Council is scheduled to
consider its own climate action plan, including uses of alternative fuels such as vegetable-based biodiesel and ethanol.
Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, D -Los Angeles, is championing A632, along with Assemblywoman Fran Pavle D
Agoura Hills, author of the 2004 landmark law that cut greenhouse emissions from passenger cars and trucks.
Generally, the bill would reduce emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020.
That's a 25 percent reduction over forecast levels, and 10 percent below the current 500 million metric tons a year.
Industries would be required to report greenhouse gas emissions to the state, a practice several businesses already do
voluntarily.
You have to set a cap so you mean what you say. It can't be voluntary,"
Pavley said.
Six years ago, the Legislature set up the California Climate Action Registry for businesses and government agencies to
inventory greenhouse gas emissions, with an eye toward reductions.
The registry opened in 2002 with 23 members. Today it has 72 members, many from businesses that would be required
to report their emissions under the proposed legislation.
The registry counts among its members nearly all the power companies in the state and the oil giants BP and Shell.
Nationwide, the petroleum industry has been moving since 1999 toward calculating its greenhouse gas emissions, said
John Felmy, chief economist for the American Petroleum Institute.
The institute wants to keep the registry voluntary.
You can have government review and oversight that can be really onerous,"
Felmy said.
Power generators are wary, too.
People in my industry are going to want some answers to questions of how much is this going to cost so they can tell
their customers," said GaryAckerman, executive director of the Western Power
3
Trading Forum.
We're supportive of environmental restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions, but i think Californians need to be aware
that there's no free lunch," said Ackerman, whose group represents buyers and sellers of wholesale power in 13 Western
states.
Tamminen and Lloyd, the governor's top environmental advisers, said companies in Silicon Valley and elsewhere have
captured significant savings by switching to more efficient power generators that emit less carbon dioxide..
They cited a UC Berkeley study released earlier this year predicting that the governor's greenhouse gas reduction target
could create more than 20,000 jobs and add $60 billion to the gross state product by 2020.
The Bee's Chris Bowman can be reached at (916) 321-1069 or cbowman@sacbee.com.
162498
Ann Hancock (707) 237-2696
Climate Protection Campaign
www.climateprotectioncampaign.org
P.O. Box 529 Graton, CA 95444 U.S.A.
Big vision, bold action
The mission of the Climate Protection Campaign is to create a positive future for our children and all life by inspiring
action in response to the climate crisis. We advance practical, science -based solutions for significant greenhouse gas
reductions.
Choose a caring real estate professional who supports the Campaign. Learn
more: www.coolagents.org
4
2006
The Honorable Fran Pavley
State Capitol, Room 3120
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: AB 32 (Pavlev) — SUnDort
Dear Assembly Member Pavley,
On behalf of 01 we are writing to express our support for AB 32. 'Establishing concrete
limits on the state's global warming pollution, and developing a mandatory reporting
system to track progress towards the limits, are essential to secure the state's economic
prosperity, protect public health and the environment.
California is the world's twelfth largest emitter of global warming pollution. California's
leadership could have a real impact in curbing global warming, while giving the state a
competitive advantage in the fast-growing clean energy market.
Unless action is taken soon, experts say global warming is expected 'to threaten
California's economy and environment, causing worse air quality, increased disease
outbreaks and heat -related deaths in some areas, a rise in sea level, and a loss of mountain
snowpack and more frequent droughts that will increase the threat of water shortages and
wildfire, among other problems.
There are many actions California can take to tackle global warming. Investments in
pollution -cutting strategies such as energy efficiency, clean energy, cleaner cars and
fuels, improved transit, smart growth, and water conservation will enable the state to cut
emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
Economists have found that meet this pollution limit will provide tens of thousands of
new jobs and save families and businesses billions of dollars by 2020. And by acting
soon to limit global warming pollution, California can provide a clear market signal to
spur innovation and drive new investments in clean, efficient solutions, creating new job
opportunities and enabling the state to lead the global.market for advanced energy
technologies.
commends you for your leadership in addressing global warming and securing
California's competitiveness in the worldwide clean energy market.
Sincerely,
IS
tq--,
WD 9 -K-
S ESS1 ON
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
2006-07 Budget
General Fund
GENERAL FUND CASH BAL 7/1/06
REVENUES:
Property Taxes
Taxes (Other Than Property)
Licenses and Permits
Fines
Interest and Rents
From Other Agencies
Charges for Current Services
Miscellaneous
TOTAL REVENUE
OTHER SOURCES/(USES) OF CASH:
From Gas Tax Fund
From Reserve for Self -Insured Losses
From Rent Appeals Board Fund
From Traffic Safety Fund
From FIGR (per MOU)
From Measure M Funds
From SLESF (AB 3229) Fund
From Sales of Surplus Assets
To General Fund Endowment Reserve
From Animal Shelter Donations
From CDC Housing Fund
From Vehicle Abatement Fund
From Measure M Transportation Fund
To Traffic Safety Fund
TOTAL NET SOURCES OF CASH
EXPENDITURES:
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works & Inspection
Parks and Recreation
Other
Sub -total
Exp. Charged To Water Operation
Exp. Charged To Sewer Operation
Exp: Charged To Community Dev. Commission/Housing
Exp. Charged To Community Dev. Commission/Projects
Exp. Charged to Refuse Enterprise Fund
TOTAL EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS
GENERAL FUND CASH BAL 6/30/06 - EST.
Approved
Budget
0
2,936,000
10, 894, 570
1,755,000
200,000
1,678,050
3,744,600
2,360,825
92,500_
23,661,545
306,000
360,000
20,000
52,000
500,000
460,000
100,000
3,606,833
893,935)
30,000
90,000
15,000
8,000
190,000)
28,125,443
7,318,526
17,157,457
3,344,929
3,177,584
1,268,947
32,267,443
1,579,800)
1,053,200)
733, 000)
566, 000)
210,000)
28,125,443
0
ofo
REVENUES
Property Taxes
Property Taxes -Secured
Property Taxes -Unsecured
H.O.P.T.R.
Total Property Taxes
Other Taxes
Real Property Transfer Tax
Sales and Use Tax
Sales Tax Compensation Fund
Transient Occupancy Tax
Franchises
P.G. & E.
C Cable TV
Refuse Franchise Fee
Total Other Taxes
Licenses and Permits
Business Licenses
Animal Licenses
Building Permits
Plan Check Fees
Total License & Permits
Fines, Forfeits & Penalties
Vehicle Code Fines
Parking Fines
Impound Fees
Other Court Fines
Total Fines, Forfeits & Pen.
Rev from Use of Money & Property
Investment Earnings
Rent: Golf Courses
Rent Other: Ch 22, Stadium
Rent: Billboard Land Lease
Winston Tires
Rent: Land N. of Big 4 Rents
Lease: Main Station Cell Towers,
CDC Land Leases
Rent: Royal Coach Chevron
YMCA Bldg Lease
Piranha Swimming
OADS
Rent: Alternative Ed. School
Rent: Rebuilding Together
Lease: Wellness Center
Total Rev Use of Money & Prop.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
2006-2007 Budget
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Budget
2005-06
2,567,000
165,000
50,000
2,782,000
Estimated Budget INCR/
6/30/2006 2006-07 DECR)
2,596,808 2,700,000 5%
175,917 183,000 11%
51,084 53,000 6%
2,823,809 2,936,000 6%
220,500 233,567 243,000 10%
5,591,250 5,797,194 5,750,000 3%
1,763,750 1,555,120 2,036,570 15%
1,415,000 1,562,697 1,610,000 14%
360,000
370,000
464, 000
10,184,500
500,000
55,000
315,000
185, 000
1,055,000
60,000
70,000
19,000
15,000
164,000
900,000
150,000
0
5,000
0
4,000
96,000
210,000
8,600
600
0
0
2,800
624
135,084
1,512,708
351,453
403,936
484,097
10,388,064
494,609
54,918
215,000
70,000
834,527
113,970
70,680
26,500
9,905
221,055
1,168,172
0
13,052
4,207
0
3,980
89,923
210,000
8,597
150
0
0
2,916
624
153,697
1,655,318
355,000
400,000
500,000
10,894,570
500,000
55,000
660,000
540,000
1,755,000
100,000
70,000
20,000
10,000
200,000
1,200,000
76,500
0
7,000
2,600
4,000
144,500
210,000
6,000
0
19,200
4,800
2,800
650
0
1,678,050
0%
0%
110%
192%
66%
67%
0%
5%
33%
22%
33%
49%
DIV/0!
40%
DIV/0!
0%
51%
0%
30%
100%
DIV/0!
DIV/0!
0%
100%
100%
11%
REVENUES
Rev from Other Agencies
State Motor Veh In Lieu
Property Tax in-leiu of VLF
Off High Motor Vehicle Lic.
Public. Safety Augment. Fund
Grants: General Fund
Misc. Other. Rev. (booking fees)
P.O.S.T. Reimbursements
SB 90 Mand Costs Reimb.
Lease Purchase Revenue
Total Rev Other Agencies
Charges for Current Services
Zoning & Subdivision Fees
General Plan Maintenance Fee
Sale of Maps, Etc.
Special Public Safety Serv.
Fire Company Inspection Fee
Vehicle Abatement Revenue
Animal Shelter Fees
Engineering Fees
Sub -Total Chgs. For Curr Svc.
Recreation Related Income
Sports Center
Swimming Pools
Special Contract Classes
R.P. Comm Cntr Rentals
Burton Ave Center Rentals
Ladybug Rec Building
Recreation Programs
Senior Center
Scout Hut
Total Recreation Income
Performing Arts Center
Assessment District Admin.
Library Landscape Maint.
Total Charges Current Services
Miscellaneous Income/Donations
Sale of land/buildings
Total General Fund Revenues
Total excluding One -Time Items
grants, leases, sale of property)
Budget
2005-06
336,000
1,896,000
1,000
220,000
783,000
45,000
65,000
9,000)
823,000
4,160,000
48,750
120, 000
1,500
40,000
10,000
26,000
60,000
150,000 .
456,250
414,300
207,000
130,000
60,500
22,000
7,300
230,000
46,600
800
1,118,500
670,600
0
8,000
2,253,350
88,800
0
Estimate
6/30/2006
249,511
2,513,300
1,600
230,798
49,804
0
22,706
0
818,624
3,886,343
31,808
29,131
20,040
50,828
139,654
27,497
52,459
76,897
428,314
387,444
190,012
100,959
53,983
13,620
5,933
181,548
61,634
630
995,763
473,478
0
7,896
1,905,451.
99,665
621,704
Budget % INCR/
2006-07 (DECR)
257,000
3,034,000
1,600
240,000
162,000
0
25,000
25,000
0
3,744,600
50,000
120,000
20,000
50,000
150,000
28,000
55,000
200,000
673,000
392,800
201,400
120,000
60,000
20,000
6,500
210,200
49,000
800
1,060,700
619,125
0
8,000
2,360,825
92,500
3,606,833
24%
N/A
60%
9%
100%
0%
62%
0%
100%
10%
3%
0%
1233%
25%
1400%
8%
8%
33%
48%
5%
3%
8%
1%
9%
11%
9%
5%
100%
5%
8%
0%
0%
5%
4%
DIV/0!
22,2 $22,435,936 __$
777,
268,378 2376
20,594,358 $20,945,864 $23,499,545
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
2006-2007 BUDGET
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
2005-06
CATEGORY/DEPT. BUDGET
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
City Council 106,334
City Administration 582,868
Finance & Accounting 1,266,765
Information Systems 435,119
Legal Services 300,000
Planning Dept. & Comm. 410,327
Human Resource 276,390
Rent Appeals Board 109,737
City Office Building 439,120
City Office Annex 64,600
General Gov't -Non Dept. 1,611,590
Retired Empl. Benefits 793,084
General Gov't -Non Dept.(T/O) 294,502
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 6,690,436
PUBLIC SAFETY
Police/Fire Personnel
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Fire Prevention
Animal Control
Animal Shelter
Public Safety Bldg. SW
Public Safety Bldg. Main
Public Safety Bldg. North
Public Safety Bldg. South
Civil Prepared ness/Haz. Mat
Youth & Family Services
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY
PUBLIC WORKS
City Engineer
Building
General
Maint. of Trees/ Parkways
Maintenance of Streets
Street Lighting
Traffic Signals
Storm Drains & Drainage
Weed Abatement
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
13,083,331
1,556,008
723,060
0
294,088
74,960
3,400
361,500
64,000
27,000
14,000
118,169
16,319,516
645,377
445,989
647,036
125,950
486,973
183,200
100,000
81,450
2,500
2,719,375
2006-07.
BUDGET
108,549
749,303
1,352,436
496,030
300,000
430,567
294,005
113,821
449,025
56,300
1,762,518
861,986
343,986
7,318,526
13,800,883
1,672,542
504,195
117,283
378,555
94,320
2,900
400,280
21,500
14,500
31,000
119,499
17,157,457
782,230
531,611
849,346
377,680
435,112
185,400
96,000
81,250
6,300
3,344,929
INCREASE
DECREASE)
2,215
166,435
85,671
60,911
0
20,240
17,615
4,084
9,905
8,300)
150,928
68,902
49,484
628,090
717,552
116,534
218,865)
117,283
84,467
19,360
500)
38,780
42,500)
12, 500)
17,000
1,330
837,941
136,853
85,622
201,410
251,730
51,861)
2,200
4,000)
200)
3,800
625,554
CHANGE
2.08%
28.55%
6.76%
14.00%
0.00%
4.93%
6.37%
3.72%
2.26%
12.85%)
9.37%
8.69%
16.80%
9.39%
5,48%
7.49%
30,27%)
DIV/0!
28.72%
25.83%
14.71%)
10.73%
66.41%)
46.30%)
121.43%
1.13%
5.13%
21.21%
19.20%
31.08%
199.87%
10.65%)
1.20%
4.00%)
0.25%)
152.00%
23.00%
CATEGORY/DEPT.
PARKS & RECREATION
Park Maintenance
Alicia Park
Benecia Park
Caterpillar Park
Colegio Park Area
Dorotea Park
Eagle Park
Golis Park
Honeybee Park
Ladybug Park Area
Sunrise Park
Magnolia Park
Roberts Lake Park
Rainbow Park
Recreation Commission
Recreation Admin.
Contract Classes
Recreation Programs
Senior Citizen Center
Senior Citizen Mini -Bus
Alicia Pool
Benecia Pool
Ladybug Pool
Honeybee Pool
Magnolia Pool
Sports Center
Comm. Center Compl. Gr.
R.P. Community Center
Burton Ave. Rec. Center
Benecia Youth Center
Ladybug Rec. Bldg.
Scout Hut
Library
School Grounds Maint.
TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION
OTHER
Golf Course General
Performing Arts Center
Booking Fees/County
Prop Tax Admin Fee/County
Sexual Assault Examinations
Federal Grants (Public Safety)
TOTALOTHER
TOTAL ALL DEPARTMENTS
2005-06
BUDGET
534,701
26,500
33,050
5,350
19,550
21,470
25,700
24,350
18,540
22,630
33,250
55,640
18,500
11,190
1,275
175,103
65,000
404,092
200,299
4,750
50,253
52,563
45,453
169,357
53,163
524,443
72,030
183,594
55,915
2,015
14,446
500
8,500
3,000
2,936,172
0
907,014
210,000
50,000
20,000
783,000
1,970,0.14
30,635,513
2006-07
BUDGET
516,413
27,600
38,205
51800
21,690
22,630
28,800
30,260
20,440
26,300
38,500
60,900
16,000
11,380
1,200
185,355
72,000
476,929
232,241
43,500
62,730
104,210
56,010
190,001
64,453
496,519
44,340
196,734
56,236
1,720
15,988
500
0,000
3,000
3,177,584
0
921,947
135,000
35,000
15,000
162,000
1,268,947
32,267,443
TOTAL EXCLUDING GRANTS $29,852,513 $32,105,443
INCREASE
DECREASE)
18,288)
1,100
5,155
450
2,140
1,160
3,100
5,910
1,900
3,670
5,250
5,260
2,500)
190
75)
10,252
7,000
72,837
31,942
38,750
12,477
51,647
10,557
20,644
11,290
27,924)
27,690)
13,140
321
295)
1,542
0
500
0
241.412
0
14,933
75,000)
15,000)
5,000)
621,000)
701,067)
1,631,930
2,252,930
CHANGE
3.42%)
4.15%
15.60%
8.41%
10.95%
5.40%
12.06%
24.27%
10.25%
16.22%
15.79%
9.45%
13.51%)
1.70%
5.88%)
5.85%
10.77%
18.02%
15.95%
815.79%
24.83%
98.26%
23.23%
12.19%
21.24%
5.32%)
38.44%)
7.16%
0.57°')
14.64%)
10.67%
0.00%
5.88%
0.00%
8.22%
0.00%
1.65%
35.71%
30.00%
25.00%
79.31%
35.59%)
5.33%
7.55%
CITY OF ROHNERT'PARK
2006-07 Budget
Recap of Operating Capital Expenditures and Equipment
Total General Government
PUBLIC SAFETY
2200 Police Protection
9510 Equipment
ID Card Printer
Universal AFIS Workstation
Other Equipment
9520 Office Equipment
Folding Machine
9530 Communications Equipment
5) Portable Radios
9610 Vehicles
3) Patrol Vehicles
Patrol Sergeant SUV Vehicle
PSA Truck
2) Dual Purpose Motorcycles
Detective Vehicle
Commander Vehicle
2) Motorcycles
9800 Other Equipment
15) Remington 870 Shotgun
6) 37mm bean bag guns
10) Glock model 22 handguns
Handheld Radar
8) AR -15 Rifles
2300 Fire Protection
9510. Equipment
Rescue Tools for new Engine 9982
Automatic External Defibrillators
4) TET Ball Intake Valves
Jaws of Life
Refurbish & Upgrade 9943
Refurbish 9982
2) Handheld Thermal imaging cameras
9511 FEMA Equipment
Refurbish Air Truck
4
0
R 5,000
40,000 (County Grant)
15,000 60,000 (JAG Award)
500 500
R 5,000 5,000
R 133,500
R 44,500
15,000 Vehicle Abatement)
20,000 replaces park patrol cont
R 25,000
R 23,000
R 52,000 313,000 (Traffic Safety)
8R 9,000
2,580
5,750
R 5,000
7,200 29,530 408,030
USAR 47,300
R 15,000
5,000
20,000
70,000
USAR 25,000
10,500 192,800
100,000 100,000 (FEMA Grant)
292,800
2310 Fire Prevention
9510 Equipment
Flatbed scanner
9610 Vehicles
Ford F150 Extended cab truck
2410 Animal Shelter
9510 Equipment
Centrifuge
2510 Main Station
9300 Building Improvements
Stand alone Air Handler HVAV (Dispatch)
9700 Office Furniture
File Cabinet - Lateral
Total Public Safety
CLIC WORKS
3300 Public Works General
9510 Equipment
Miscellaneous Shop Equipment
9610 Vehicles.
3/4 Ton Pick-up
2) 1/2 Ton Pick-up
3410 Trees & Parkways
9510 Equipment
Picnic Tables & Benches
9610 Vehicles
3/4 Ton Pick-up
Chipper Truck
3420 Streets & Bikepaths
9510 Equipment
Miscellaneous Equipment
Total Public Works
1,000 1,000
21,000 21,000 22,000
R 3,000 3,000 3,000
35,000 35,000
1,000 1,000
22,000 22,000
R 30,000
1R 24,000 54,000
R 5,000 5,000
R 30,000
R 62,000 92,000
36,000
97,000
8,900 8,900 (Measure M)
761,830
181,900
RECREATION
5200 Recreation Administration
9510 Equipment
Miscellaneous Equipment
5501 Senior Center
9300 Building Improvements
Kitchen
9700 Office Furniture
Desk
5502 Senior Center Mini Bus
9610 Vehicles
Van
5710 Alicia Pool
9510 Equipment
Pool Vac
5720 Benecia Pool
9510 Equipment
Pool Vac & Chemtrol
Slide
5730 Ladybug Pool
9510 Equipment
Pool Vac & Tarps
5740 Honeybee Pool
9510 Equipment
Pool Vac & Covers
5750 Magnolia Pool
9510 Equipment
Pool Vac
5810 Sports Center
9300 Building Improvements
Mirrors
9510 Equipment
Replace TV's
5830 Community Center
9510 Furniture and Fixtures
Stove
LCD Projector
4001 Park Maintenance
9510 Equipment
Miscellaneous Equipment
Miscellaneous Equipment
9610 Vehicles
2 x 4 Polaris Vehicle
Total Recreation
Total General Fund Capital Expenditures
1,000 1,000 1,000
12,000 12,000
4,000 4,000 16,000
40,000 40,000 '40,000
1,200 1,200 1,200
3,200
35,000 38,200 38,200
4,000 4,000 4,000
5,400 5,400 5,400
1,200 1,200 1,200
3,000 3,000
R 5,000 5,000 8,000
5,000
4,000 9,000 9,000
8,167
1,950 10, 117
R 12,000 12,000 22,117
146,117
1,089,847
Budgeted in 5313 - Non Routine Facility Maintenance
Department Description
1810 -City Hall Annex _ Unexpected Repairs
2410 -Animal Shelter Unexpected Repairs
Repaint 1/2 dog rooms
Replace kitchen counter
Repaint exterior trim
2500 - Public Safety Central Unexpected Repairs
2510 - Public Safety Main Unexpected Repairs
Roof repair
Repaint 2nd floor
pneumatic tube repair
Intercom System repair
Chiller controls (4)
Lift rent - to prevent nesting
2600 - Public Safety North Unexpected Repairs
2610 - Public Safety South Unexpected Repairs
3300 - Public Works Unexpected Repairs
3910 - Storm Drains Unexpected Repairs
4010 - Alicia Park Unexpected Repairs
5501 - Senior Center Unexpected Repairs
5720 - Benecia Pool Slide
5810 - Sports Center Unexpected Repairs
5830 - Community Center Unexpected Repairs
5840 - Burton Av. Rec Ctr. Unexpected Repairs
Amount Department Total
1,000 1,000
3,500
15,000
2,500
91000 30,000
1,000 1,000
5,000
4,000
60,000
10,000
600
8,000
2,000 89,600
3,000 3,000
5,000 5,000
1,000 1,000
71,250 71,250 no back-up
300 300
1,000 1,000
35,000 35,000
1,000 1,000
1,000 1,000
1,000 1,000
Total 241,150
West Coast
Insurance Services Corporation.
May 22, 2006
Ms. Sandy Lipitz
Finance Director
City of Rohnert Park
6750 Commerce Blvd.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
FT',2'
1
uoC e -F l cJork o s5(
RE: Group Dental and Vision Insurance Plans
Dear Sandy:
James T. West, CEBS, CLU
555 Fifth Street, Suite 230
Santa Rosa, CA 95401
707) 523-5993 direct
707) 526-2114 fax
RVt ncil:X
Miscellaneous
Communications
A endsto: y
Cop to:
S S/°6
Cvw
We have been reviewing the City's policies for Group Dental and Vision Coverage for City employees and their
families. The current carriers are Delta Dental of California (Delta) and Vision Service Plan (VSP). Both plans
are scheduled to renew on July
1s' 2006.
Delta actually has two plans in effect, whereas VSP has one plan, briefly described as follows.
Delta Dental has management employees covered under a self-insured arrangement, wherein the City of
Rohnert Park's costs are the dollar amount of claims paid by Delta, plus a 12% administration fee.
Delta Dental has non -management employees covered under an insured arrangement, wherein the City
of Rohnert Park's costs are currently $121.21 per month per employee, and are scheduled to increase an
additional 5% on July
is'
to $126.61 per month per employee.
VSP has all employees covered under an insured arrangement, wherein the City of Rohnert Park's costs
are currently $41.32 per month per employee.
Generally, employers of 100 employees or more can be covered more efficiently, and less expensively, using a
self-insured arrangement. The risk of large claims doesn't exist, since the dental plan's benefits are limited to a
fixed dollar amount per patient per year ($2,000/patient). Similarly, the vision plan's benefits are limited by
frequency, such as no more than two pairs of glasses per member per year, etc. Employers don't need to "buy
insurance" for these types of benefits, since the dollar amount of claims is relatively small and quite predictable.
There are additional reasons that employers choose not to buy insurance for this type of benefit, such as
avoiding these additional expenses:
Insured plans must build in a premium tax of 2.35% to the State of California;
Insurance agent commissions are included in insured plans, generally 5%;
Insurance companies include a "profit" or "reserve" of an additional 5%;
Insurance companies often include a "margin" of an additional 3%-5%.
The City of Rohnert Park can easily become self-insured by hiring the Delta and VSP claim departments to just
process your employees' claims, in the same manner as they do now under the insured plans, without any
changes in policy numbers, covered services, or claim services. In short, you can hire the "back office" of the
insurance company and eliminate most of the extra charges listed above_
DELTA DENTAL
Instead of paying insurance premiums, the City can choose to pay only the dollar amount of paid claims, plus a
nominal administration fee. In the case of Delta Dental, the administration fee will be $10.78/month/employee,
which equates to only 10% of estimated claims (Rohnert Park's current arrangement with management
employees has a charge of 12% of claims). We asked Delta Dental to project dental costs for the 2006-2007
plan year, and their analysis yielded the following figures:
Management & Non -management employees:
Dental Claims Projection $108.28
Administration Fee $ 10.78
Total Cost $119.06 per month per employee
This will produce a savings, since the Management Employees are currently being charged 12% for
administration, instead of the 10% listed above. Additionally, non -management employees are currently being
charged $121.21 and will be increased to $126.61 instead of the $119.06 above. We estimate the savings on the
dental plan to be approximately $20,000 per year.
VSP
Similarly, the City can choose to pay only the dollar amount of paid vision claims plus a nominal administration
fee. Currently, the City pays an "insured" premium of $41.32 per month per employee. However, claims have
averaged only $28.52 per month per employee over the last 12 months, which leaves "retention" (the an.ount
retained by VSP for administration/commissions/premium taxes/margin/etc) of $12.80 per month ($39,206 per
year on 257 employees), which is essentially shared by the broker and VSP.
Under the self-insured arrangement, you would pay only $5.23 per month for administration ($.50 of which is
paid to the broker) or $16,019 per year in total. The City would also pay the actual dollar amount of paid
claims, estimated by VSP to be $29.64 in the upcoming year, for a total cost of $34.87 per month per employee.
Hence, the City's savings will be $6.45 per month per employee ($41.32434.87), or approximately 16% which
is $19,892 annually from the vision plan alone.
Employees would notice no changes whatsoever in their benefits, since nothing changes, except the manner in
which the City of Rohnert Park is billed for the coverage.
1 hope this answers your questions, please advise if you need any additional clarification.
Respectfully,
James T. West
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
Total
Public Police/Fire Police
2006-2007 Budget
Safety Personnel. Protection
2100 2200
Employee Services
4101 Regular -Salaries-Sworn & CSO 7,786,110 7,481,448
Public
4110 Longevity Pay 229,93.7 224,301
Youth &
412X Fire Engineers, Capt. & EMT Pay 187,683 187,683
Safety Safety
41 XX Other Salaries 514,237 514,237 a
Protection
42XX Part -Time Salaries 36,000 12,000
Main North
4401 Overtime Salaries 956,000 936,000
2300 2310
45XX Other Salaries 533,136 533,136 b
2600 2610
4800 Training and Education 207,500 125,000 c
4961 Counseling 25,000 25,000
49XX Allocation of Employee Benefits 4,011,947 3,912,078
4999 Public Works Recharge 146,520 103,680
5,636
i
TOTAL 14,634,070 13,800,883 253,680
Supplies and Other Expenditures
i
5100 Office Supplies 27,800 24,000
5125 First Aid Supplies 15,200
55,000.
5130 Postage 9,900 7,500
5140 Books, Pamphlets & Periodicals 6,750
j
1,500
21,542
521X Special Departmental Supplies 273,125 144,000 d
5220 Heat, Light & Power 153,000
25,920
523X Telephone 98,880 2,000
5240 Advertising and Publications 100 100
5250 Uniform Expense 72,000 40,000 e
5260 Dues and Subscriptions 9,700
285,005
6,400
0
5270 Vehicle Supplies (Gas & Oil) 146,500
18,000
120,000
5310 Facility Maintenance/Routine 98,500
5313 Facility Maintenance/Non-Routine 128,600
600
5320 Vehicle Repairs & Maint. 84,500 52,000
5330 Special Dept. Equip. (R&M) 24,600 17,000 f
5340 Office Equip.. Supplies & Maint. 34,000 30,000
5350 Small Tools 2,500
2,000
5370 Equipment Rental 0
6101 Contractual Services 690,982
1,500
595,982 g
6103 Spay/Neuter Expense 14,000)
2,000
6110 Professional Services 10,500
48,600
7,500 h
6310 Equipment Leases 5,570
3,000
3,350
6315 Rent/Lease/Taxes 0
20,000 120,000
6600 Travel and Meetings 12,500 7,000
6710 Community Promotion 8,100
400
5,500 i
6910. Miscellaneous Other Charges 17;250
a
2,000 i
TOTAL 1,916,557 0 1,065,832
Other Expenditures
l
2,000 1,000 200
9XXX Capital Outlay Detail on
100
page 53 et sequentia 761,830
6,000
408,030
500
210-7100 Lease Debt Prin. Pmts. (pg. 26) 0
210-7200 Lease Debt Int. Pmts. (pg. 26) 0
21,000 o
TOTAL 761,830 0 408,030
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,312,457 13,800,883 1,727,542
30.000 p
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
2006-2007 Budget
Public Safety Expenditures
Public Public Public Public Emerg_ Youth &
Fire Fire Animal Animal Safety Safety Safety Safety Prep./ Family
Protection Prevention. Control Shelter Central Main North South Haz Mat Services
2300 2310 2400 2410 2500 2510 2600 2610 2700 2800
37,921 186,232 80,509
5,636
i
24,000
i
20,000
55,000. 8,000 1,500 1$I04ry
j
21,542 53,273 25,054 I
25,920 16,920 I
p
80,920 67,463 285,005 16,920 0 0 0 0 18,000 111,199
600 1,000 2,200
15,200
2,000 400
1,500 1,500 250 2,000
75,775 k 1,500 48,600 3,000 250
20,000 120,000 10,000 3,000 j
300 2,500 400 89,680 3,000 1,000
a
32,000 1 l
2,000 1,000 200 100
20,000 6,000 500 m 1
21,000 o 1,500 q 65.000 r 5,500 t 5,500 u
30.000 p 1,000 89;600 s 3,000 w 5,000 A
30,000 1,500 1,000
5,000 2,500 100
1.500 2,500
2,000 500 U
32,000. m 10,000 50,000 3,000 v
1
14,000)
1.000 2,000
900 1,320
2,000 500 2,000 1,000
1 !
1,500 1,000 100
10,000 n 5,000 250 i
D C) 230,475 27,820 93,550. 74,400 2.900 364,280 21,500 14,500 13,000 8,300
292,800 22,000 0 3.000 36,000 d
t I
292,800 22,000 0 3.000 0 36.000 0 0 0 0
iV1
21-
604-195 117.283 378,555 94-320 2_900 400-280 21_500 14_500 31.000 119-499
O
2006-2007 Budget
Notes to Expenditure Statements
a. Other salaries
Fire services overtime (4121) 140,000
Court time (4130) 65,300
Uniform Allowance (4128) 18,240
FTO/CTO Pay (4124) 33,040
P.O.S.T. Certification Pay (4127) 215,618
Detective Pay (4129) 18,132
Motorcycle Stipend (4132) 4,442
Fire Services Stipend (4133) 15,023
Canine Handler (4134) 4,442
b. Holiday Pay 5485,000
Educational Stipend 48,136
C. Special police & fire training held every week.
Also, P.O.S.T. reimbursable classes ($65,000) are
included here.
d. Ammunition, safety equipment, film & radio supplies, weapon
related eq., badges & ticket books, recording tapes, flares
miscellaneous items
e. City provides uniforms to officers required to wear them
f. Equipment repair and maintenance $17,000
g. Annual maint. LiveScan & printer $9,000
Blood Draws, SCNET contract, inve: 14,000
Imageware contract, document imag: 3,000
CAD/RMS on-going support/maintenai 508,197
Voiceprint on-going support/maint( 8,500
SCSO Bomb Team Contract 40,000
K-9 Training and Veterinarian 5,000
Miscellaneous contractual service: 8,285
1. Turn out gear, replacements and wildland fire
turnout gear
m. Contracts for automatic defibrillator, linens
extinguisher maintenance, hazardous materials
clean-up & haz mat physicals
n. Volunteer stipends and CSFA'dues for volunteers
o. Ongoing routine supplies and facility maintenance
p. Non -routine maintenance $3,500
Paint half the dog rooms 15,000
Replace kitchen counter 2,500
Paint exterior trim 9,000
30,000
q. Ongoing routine supplies and facility $1,500
r. Misc. main station building maintenanc $65.,000
s. Unanticipated facility maintenance $89,600
t. Ongoing routine supplies and facility $5,500
u. Ongoing routine supplies and facility $5,500
v. Annual OES contract with County of Sor $3,000
w. On-going fuel tank maintenance ' $3,000
h. Police sketches, central pathology, polygraph, K-9 Liability Fund
i. Neighborhood watch signs, sticker & other promotional
literature, film & video rentals.
j. Awards Program, Reserves & Explorers
k. Rescue equipment (USAR), ladders, axes, hoses, masks, etc.
May 26, 2006
Fc-R--
I3Lc,OC E7.— Council:
L430 a Miscellaneous
Sb`S-SStoN Communications to
0 iC S
CITY ADMINISTRATION Agenda-5/3p
Copy to:
MEMORANDUM copy to:
TO: Honorable Mayor Smith and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dan Schwarz, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Department of Public Safety — Budget Overview
Costs related to Expanding/Modifying Fire Services Division
At its March 28, 2006 meeting, the Council received a presentation from Lt. Dave
Fraser of the Public Safety Department providing a history of the Fire Services
Division and a review of current staffing and equipment levels, response times,
and service areas. Lt. Fraser also presented the Council with issues that the
Division anticipates will arise in the immediate and distant future, and offered a
general review of future needs for the Division. The Council requested that staff
expand the breadth of Lt. Fraser's discussion of alternatives for the Division to
address:
the cost of an expanded fire division versus a separate fire department;
the relationship of the Rohnert Park Fire Services Division to neighboring
fire protection jurisdictions; and
a the types of performance measures for fire protection services that the
Council might apply to make decisions about enhancements to the Fire
Services Division (such as improved response times, ISO ratings, etc).
Staff is finalizing its summary of the information collected to date and will present
it to the Council during the Budget workshop at the May 30, 2006 meeting. As
context for the discussion, Lt. Fraser's presentation is attached. Also attached
are two tables.
Table 1 uses the 4 agencies selected by Lt. Fraser to show a comparison of total
annual costs for key positions in fire departments. A cursory review of Table 1
indicates that Rohnert Park's annual costs for each position fall in line with the
comparison agencies — particularly Petaluma and Newark. It must be noted that
firefighters in the other agencies are strictly firefighters, while Rohnert Park
firefighters are classed as public safety officers and serve a dual role. Table 2
Costs related to Expanding/Modifying Fire Services Division
May 26, 2006
Page 2
uses Lt. Fraser's estimates for a fully staffed fire department to project the
maximum potential staffing costs to the City. (Note: staff limited its analysis to
specialized positions. Administrative support staff is not included in the
calculation.)
Lt. Fraser's presentation and the two tables will serve as the baseline for staff's
discussion at the May 30 meeting. Staff will provide additional detail about
staffing levels and costs, most notably for a transition to a full fire department, as
part of the discussion. Staff will also provide an overview of various performance
measures used to evaluate fire safety so that the Council may provide feedback
as to additional information it may wish to receive.
TABLE 1
Comparison of Fire Departments
Key Positions
Top of Range
Total Annual Cost - FY05-06
POSITION NEWARK ROCKLIN PETALUMA SANTA ROSA ROHNERT PARK
Firefighter 121,098 88,342 109,250 110,802 112,526
Fire Inspector 97,370 79,567 113,839 139,231 112,526
Engineer N/A 96,710 116,498 120,492 114,967
Captain 139,154 108,705 130,285 136,314 130,312
Fire Marshal 161,908 N/A 166,861 203,485 N/A
Battalion Chief 144,948 96,216 114,485 119,100 104,389
Chief 203,544 126,324 145,662 153,120 135,876
Total Annual Cost represents annual salary and benefits. Benefits include medical, dental, vision, life insurance, long-term disability, and miscellaneous benefits.
TABLE 2
RP Fire Department Staffing -- Recommended Levels
Estimated Personnel Costs
2 Stations - current
Annual Cost
FY05-06 Figures)
1 Chief 135,876
2 Battalion Chiefs 208,778
1 Fire Marshall* 166,861
8 Captains 1,042,494
8 Engineers 919,737
8 Firefighters 900,207
2 Fire Inspectors 225,052
30 Total Specialized Personnel 3,599,005
3 Stations - addition of westside station
Annual Cost
FY05-06 Figures)
1 Chief 135,876
3 Battalion Chiefs 313,168
1 Fire Marshall* 166,861
12 Captains 1,563,741
12 Engineers 1,379,605
12 Firefighters 1,350,310
2 Fire Inspectors 225,052
43 Total Specialized Personnel 5,134,613
RP does not have a salary for this category.
Staff used the annual cost for the City of Petaluma.
NOTE: Cost figures represents maximum possible cost, as all positions are at top of range.
Fire Services Division
Historical Perspectives-
Z) F7reSe/-iires Divoisioiiy995
mPrior tu10A5'three major fires had occurred
inRohnmtPark over the last three years.
The homes involved }nthese fires were total '
losses. Response time tuthese fires was et
best "poor".
e|ttook 12minutes hoget water onto afire
that occurred inRohnartPark in1AQ5. At this
fire afire hose burst, interrupting operations.
e In many cases annual fire safety inspections
in Rohnert Park had not been done. When
these were conducted, many of the
inspections were incomplete.
v. Fire division apparatus and equipment was
not maintained and tested annually as'per
industry standards (ISO, NFPA, etc.)
q Fire training was not continual or based on
accepted professional standards at that time.
Os 1 P"
Suppression Staf hg in 1994
Rohnert Paris has four fire stations. Until 1994,
bone were staffed on a 2417 basis. Public Safety
g dVolurdeer personnel responded to the stations
when a fire call was received and responded after
sufficient personnel had arrived.
r k Depending on the day of the week, and the time of
the call, it was not uncommon for at least 12
minutes to elapse before an engine would arrve on
scene. Even though a Public Safety Officer in a
patrol car would usually arrive within 3 minutes of a
call, the additional time waiting for an engine to
arrive allowed the fire to grow unchecked. The
incident then quickly exceeded the capabilities of
the agency and our personnel.
Staffing GI•owth
Measure ''M'', the Fire Services Benefit
Assessment District, was put in place in
1996. In it's original form, it would have
provided approximately $1.2 million dollars
per year to fund Fire services in the City of
Rohnert Park, or _98division personnel.
og Due to circumstances beyond the
Department's control, the Benefit
Assessment was reduced to approximately
360,000.00 per year, which pays for 6
division personnel.
f Staff rzg Growth
r. In 1995 the Department of Public Safety
started staffing 1 apparatus with PSO's on a
2417 basis. In keeping with the Public Safety
concept, the apparatus was staffed with 2
personnel, in 1 station.
fln 1996, Gadditional personnel were diverted
t' from the Police services side of Public Safety
and re -assigned to the Fire services side of `
Public Safety so that 2 apparatus could be
staffed 2417 with 2 personnel each.
Sta fang Growth, cont.
In 1996 we also added a Public Safety
ergeant to supervise this newly created
suppression division during the daytime
hours, 4 days a week.
I4ctions Taken
Additionally, the Department of Public Safety has
addressed apparatus and equipment needs and
mandates.
r All fire apparatus are annually pump tested and
certified.
All ladders are annually tested and certified.
Each length of fire hose is annually tested and
recorded. We also maintain an on-going
replacement program for all fire hose.
ix Safety equipment (wildland and structure
clothing, boots, etc.) has been updated and is
consistent with, or above, industry standard.
RTp`
34f Actions Takeir, coni
The Department of Public Safety made a commitment
to improve the quality and amount of training we
give our line personnel and supervisors. This
training includes, but is not limited to;
io ICS.100, 200, 300 and 400.
Fire Command iA/113, and 2A/2B for Supervisors.
a Driver/Operator 1 B
W"10 week State Fire Marshal certified academy for
new hires.
Wildland firefighting safety, survival and tactics.
ig Fire prevention 1Ail B.
T n.
Actions Taken, cont.
Automatic and Mutual Aid agreements
k'41
y veri`ma'de with our neighboring Fire
agencies.
a On-going joint training exercises with
Rincon Valley and Rancho Adobe Fire
Protection Districts.
We became more of an active participant
in the County -wide and State-wide mutual
aid systems.
C) Actions Taken, cont.
The Department of Public Safety recruited
and hired a full-time Fire Inspector.
Standardize our apparatus fleet and the
tools carried on them.
4 The Department of Public Safety has
changed it's mentality of fighting fires in a
defensive mode, to that of aggressive and
coordinated initial attack.
Current Operations
Nt
r
t Fire Division Staff
Total I ativ
Staff:—
i` 68 FTE
Total Fire Staff
Total Support 19.5 FTE
Staff
21 FTE
OFire Scheduling
v.24 / 7 City Coverage
Fire Apparatus Crews Kelly Shift tea hls.)
Fire Supervisors t+.o nr, a- i c 3vcck)
x(Administrative Response (Only if Available)
5 Ptd)
Volunteer Firefighters
n Auto -Aid Agreements
v, Mutual Aid Agreements
Off Duty Call Back Page
Fire Crews
Two 2 -Person Fire Crews*
2 Public Safety Officers per Apparatus
eAt least one is a Driver/operator
Additional Firefighteds
eFire Inspectorls (M -F, 7-5)
Aon -Duty Police Patrol Officerls
AVolunteer Firefighters
C-) Fire Supervision
Fire Grew Supervision
2 Public Safety Sergeants (Fire Captains)
t 4110 Schedule, Daytime Hours, 7 AM — 5 PM
a 1 Sergaanl On Duty Sunday - Wednesday
9 Sergeant On Duty Vlednesday _. Saturday
K Respond independent from fire apparatus
Cover medical calls when designated fire crew is
unavailable.
Fire Response
Initial RPDPS Response
P 2 Engines (2 Persons Each), 1 Supervisor
2 Police Patrol PSOs = 7 Personnel Total
k Minimum Response to Room & Contents
Fire
15 Personnel
Supplemental Response or Additional
Personnel needed
Supplemental Fire Response
s-: an riuw,-r w riy cc ncuaa -' ,a
a Negotiated, Documented Response Agreements between".
T, adjoining jurisdictions for automatic response to specified
incidents
A Standard Practice Throughout fndustry
o RPDPS has agreements with Rincon Valley FPD and
Rancho Adobe FPD to supply and receive assistance in
the, event of
Ttruxturefires -
a Water Flc:v Ala ms
x Vegetation Fires
I( Vehicle Accidenis;Ezir.ca'iers
A Hxy 101
A
t
i Station 1 iHOj
Station 3
wSlation q (Southern)
Staffed
dr{anclio Adobe
Station I
aF a610 Adobe
Station 2
xRincon Valley Station
F) Supplemental Fire Response
t-.' Mutual Aid
iRPDPS is a participant in the state-wide
master mutual aid agreement
4 Mutual Aid is a request by RPDPS for specific
resources from any available agency, county-
wide, state-wide or nation-wide, depending on
the nature and scope of the emergency
Coordinated/Dispatched by REDCOM
Supplemental Fire Response
k Mutual Aid, cont...
WResponse request for specified RPDPS
apparatus or single resource to any
jurisdiction, nationwide
nRequires 3 -person apparatus minimum
fxIf no Fire Supervisor or Fire Inspector is available
V person is drawn from Police Patrol resources
RPDPS can decline if there are insufficient
resources to commit to the request
Fire Fleet
9935
Acquired 1978 (28 Yrs.)
r 9983 _
Acquired 1980 (26 Yrs.) _ 1-17---
9960
91 Acquired 1989 (17 Yrs.) E
3k 9984
u'Acquired 1991 (15 Yrs.) '
ik 9950
Acquired 1994 (12 Yrs.)
Fire Flect
9943
k. Acquired 1994 (12 Yrs.)
9980
mAcquired 1098 (8 Yrs.)
9985 `New Standard'
Acquired 2005 (1 Yr.) 74 -
9946 w
Acquired 2006
X9915/9916
Acquired 2006
Fire Prevention Bureau
v Fire Inspectors
it Pubiir, Safety Officers
r Coordinate l Oversee Crew-sGectons
il Initiate / Handle New Cer,stici ec especlLcrs
U Plan Ci7eck
Vire Ravi Sp nk!erSt _r-= co;;a
46re Hazard Issues! En _ _c ' :,c
Systems
Code Entorcemen! -
aCover Fire. Suppression Va Andes
Court I Training I Sick I injury
I Respond to Fire Emergencies
Insjlection. Activities
Approximately 1600 Businesses
Annual Inspections
High Priority Inspections
Places of Assembly
FxSchools, Churches, Residential Care
i,High Hazards
Ea
ABulk Storage
AFabrication / Production
Fire Divisionnf
Calls.for Service
1,161% Medical Ads
a I I False Alarms
a I I setiice Calls
xlnvalld Assis!
t5laiion
coverage -
BAssist Police
Patrol
xEiert Smoke
RWater Leak
19795 Good Inten;
Calls
IdUntounded
nCancelied -
NfNTp
G" F
Response Tinres
zt Average Response Times -
U8Minutes for Fires
Approximately 4-5 t.1mutes East of H vy q01
9Approximately 7-8 Minutes West cf Hcy 101
r: 5 Minutes for Medicals'
vApproximatety3-4 Minute. East cf ri,vy ?of
ApproximatelyG-7fJlmufesN esto Hury.7Q1 e
A NEPA 9710 Standards
A 1 Minute from Dispatch to Enroute (turn -out time)
4 Minutes from Enroute to On Scene (travel 8me)
t S Minutes from Dispatch to Fire Attack (deployment)
NN,9ys
Current Challenges, Cont
At Sufficient Personnel for Call Type
A Resource Intensive Incidents
a Multiple Events
A, Ensure Presence of Incident Command
i! Minimum Staffing Requirements (NEPA [OSHA)
L 912 In 12 Out
xEnvironment Immediately Dangerous to Life % Health f0t ji}
a Rapid Intervention Crew (RIC)
sr 3 Person Minimum
Vacation / Sick / Comp Time Off Coverage
Future Growth
OFuture Considerations
Future Considerations
Existing City Expansion, Plans wr
t University Distnct
Pcoenlial for 500 Fomes
1500 Addf=.! Res.d11M
as Sonoma Mountairti iiage
A Po!en!ial for 20 O LIacA cr, H --Os
I = 5500 Addit-al Ree:dants _
A Casino / Mall Plan
x Westside CommerUal Bu fe Cut
v Southeast Specific
H Potential for HOTe,9
1500 Add to...iRe ,.e—a
A Northeast Plan
A Potential for 1000 Units
2600 Addt-al Residents ,
ryERT 4R
Future Consideratims, Cont.
Response Capabilities
Current Construction Trend
O?Live/Work Units `«
Build Up, Not Out
gAlley Style
ioHigher Density
Challenges
A Access
ham,
Exposure Control
Rescue
1 r 451 Alley Style Mousing
ii S t -ee W` T
Aller Sole Hottsinb
OLivellf ork Units
a.
R
pion -..
Future Considerations, cont.
g Training Needs
One training manager unable to meet training
mandates for both Police and Fire Divisions
New Standard Operating Procedures needs to be
developed, implemented and pracflced
Proficiency needs to be maintained s
at Fire Division Personnel -Daily trap ng $
a. Tram wAh o!heragecicsr" —41
V. D:113 We trairiing
K Must mainain POST mandateo t. rn ra (pe it^bla skilfsl
Patrol DivisionPersonnei Tvonth!y
I Core Pine Skilis
9 Block Training for fire evolutions
Q. ..
Future Considerations, coat
Supervision - Event(Project Driven
Y Need 24/7 Incident Commander
Daily Administrative Needs
i Suppress!on[Facifties1Scheei rg!Preco-r ems
47ragl4tg I Education I Safety aqd Xe;;nes5
ApparatusltJa r>fertance/Cornmc.^cac s w`
Engine Company
is Officer in charge (Each piece of apparatus]
Comparison Agencies
Organizational Charts (See handouts'
C0111j7QrZSOZIS
R.bert Pffik 42006 7 2 15 4 2 2516 4 _
Dk146 43650 13 3 51 12 3 3100 3 _ -
Ha1o1d 50000 725 2 25 6 3 3826 4
Rocitim ' 5W42. 20 3 45 3 3302 3 -
Lompoc 41650 25 2 25 21 3 2663 4- -
P.er lle 44445 15 2 50 8 -3- 3773 3
pea!um 58000 13 3 51 15 _ 53 7 7
Future Considerations, cont.
xGrowth Considerations
West Side Station
PiMeet service demands of west side build-
out
i Fire Prevention Bureau
Wnspection Supervisor (Sgt.) position
AGreater demand for pian checks:
inspections
Code enforcement issues
A Fire Division must grow with the City
Ft{ilt!T'1' Collsidel'Qtiollsf collie
Futures :: s nrtse Capabilities
a Division has evolved to a point where full self
staffing of 9 full alarm assignment is needed
Fire Officer, 1 Truck, 2 engines
Confinue to utilize "Public Safety" model
wField additional fire apparatus
A Fire can assist with patrol events as needed
Patrol personnel can assist with larger
Fire/EMS events
Flitlfl'L' CoilsldL'i'lliloliS, co11i
f Enhanced Services
1 prc3vd Response Times
Citizen Safety
Employee Safety
AISO Rating.- insurance rates will decrease
Confinue to leverage the Public Safety
concept and its built -in -efficiencies
Across Trained
r Speciaiized training - HazMat, Arson, USAR
ikinterchangable- flexible resources
Fl/tm-e Coltsidel'atioils, collt.
What is the Cost of being self-sufficient?
t,Current Costs for Fire Division (DPS)
r Personnel = $1.5 million
Operating = $403:000
4 Projected Future Costs -Comparison
Petaluma FD (Pop. 58,000)
Personnel = $3.9 million
e, Operating = $1.7 million
Costing out a Fire Dept
Vt Personnel Cost = $15 million
f 'A Operating Costs = $1.2 million
1 -Fire Chief
1 - Admin. Secty.
Le 3 - Battalion Chiefs
12 - Engine Capts.
12 - Engineers
a 12 - Firefighters
iR 1 - Deputy Fire Marshal
I -Admin. Clerk (Fire Prevenfion
it 2 - Fire Inspectors
0 The Future in No3v!!!
30-, Fire Division Priorities
Hire 2 Sergeants
xNeed 24 / 7 Incident Commanders
Need Deputy Fire Marshal -Fire Prevention
Bureau
Assist with administrative duties
AStart hiring process for (9) PSOs
Takes 24 months to hire and train new PSOs
nWill lose 6-8 PSOs next year -behind the hiring
curve
Future Rohnert Fire Dept.
mss.+..
O.pwfib AEkM ESE ct{trn.
kltnWl MdtewGni! BMIMm-ChM B.naonGM
Ada kiYUM CcpWn itck EM
FNa-. Ebuw - yMan S EnpFwrt Ew Mrt
fh koVccbr FlrcllOkM' ikMlphYt GEA
muck :- CpYFn011.FF Tmck .truck
CapVEnpIf FF CcptlEigM Fi
Costing out a Fire Dept
Vt Personnel Cost = $15 million
f 'A Operating Costs = $1.2 million
1 -Fire Chief
1 - Admin. Secty.
Le 3 - Battalion Chiefs
12 - Engine Capts.
12 - Engineers
a 12 - Firefighters
iR 1 - Deputy Fire Marshal
I -Admin. Clerk (Fire Prevenfion
it 2 - Fire Inspectors
0 The Future in No3v!!!
30-, Fire Division Priorities
Hire 2 Sergeants
xNeed 24 / 7 Incident Commanders
Need Deputy Fire Marshal -Fire Prevention
Bureau
Assist with administrative duties
AStart hiring process for (9) PSOs
Takes 24 months to hire and train new PSOs
nWill lose 6-8 PSOs next year -behind the hiring
curve
Additional C'oirsiderations
A Station -house supervision needed ,µ
eContinue to replace apparatus per
standards
Continue with specialized training
Need commitment to continue to fund Fire
Division to meet the challenges of
additional growth
io Need to be self-sufficient/prepared to
handle major events on our own
i w Services
Division
Committed to providing comprehensive,
efficient, and rapid response to anv
emergency!
FIRE DEPARTMENTS
TOP STEP
MONTHLY SALARY
POSITION NEWARK ROCKLIN PETALUMA SANTA ROSA i ffl. \ i FNEI
Firefighter $$,303 4,872 6,005 5,850 6,169
Fire Inspector $7,224 4,920 7,077 7,575 6,29. 2
Engineer N/A 5,412 6,453 6,438 6,323
Captain $9,549 6,186 7,304 7,398 7,278
Fire Marshal $12,054 N/A 9,542 11,425 N/A
Battalion Chief $12,054 8,019 9,540 9,925 9,395
4,1114 Z I1'd I "J'i d
2006 BUDGET:
2007 ORIGINAL
ESTIMATE:
CURRENT ESTIMATE
FOR 2007:
23.9
25.1
NOTE: Original estimate based
on 3% revenue growth rate
What Changed?
Property Tax, growing
at 6%
Sales Tax growing at
7%
Investment Earnings
increasing by 33%
MVLF increasing by
26%
PROPERTY TAX
4g iro td a p 1 dii
r
2006 2006 Est 2007
Budget Actual Bud.get
I7by-, ''
1'1 1 1 Z 7 i: ,
7,600,000
7,300,000
7,200,000
2006 0 6 Est 2007
Budget Actual Budget
1965®;®®®
195®®9®®®
194509000
193509000
193®®9®®6
2006 2006 Est . 2007
Budget Actual Budget
1 "1' ,1' Iw "1' 1;
IT$ 1 ;1' `I;
200,000
C
2006 1. ,1: ti. Est 2007
Budget Actual Budget
MVLF
2v500,001
21000900
195009001
2006 2006 2007
Budget Est. 'Budget
actual
Oki -z"I 4".4% 9' [$1-nI
2006 2006 2007
Budget Est. Budget
Actual
C111wil11111 111, IL L Pi 4 Z k dJ404 -;to] N J,
ZIll]ls `I. 1
TI 1„ 1 I
5]
2006 1, 1. •. 2007
udget Est. Budge
Actual
2006 BUDGET:
2007 ORIGINAL
ESTIMATE:
CURRENT ESTIMATE
FOR 2007:
26.4
NOTE: Original estimate based
on 3% expense growth rate
What Changed?
Salary &Benefits grew. by
7%)
CAD/RMS costs increased
by $273K
Property/Liability insurance
increased $215K
APS Energy Services Lease
85K
4 1z 14
COLA at 2.9%, except for police officers and
sergeants, plus step increases totalled $705K
Public.Safety P.O.S.T Stipend increase for
sworn officers ($125K)
PERS Increase ($290K) due to slight increase
in miscellaneous rate and higher persable pay
In District Stipend. ($90K)
He* alth, Vision& Dental ($39K)
Public Safety Overtime increasing $236K.to
936K
NEW POSITIONS
Public Works Mechanic
Fire Prevention Services Secretary
upgraded from hourly to full --time)
CAPITAL OUTLAY HIGHLIGHTS
3) replacement patrol
1) replacement Sergeant SUV ($44K)
1) PSA 1)
vehicle d replacement commander
vehicle 63K)
o (2) motorcycles $52K
firban search •
CAPITAL OUTLAY'HIGHTLIGHTS
3) pick-up trucks for Public Works
84K)
1-) Chipper Truck for Public Works
62K)
1) Senior
Reolacement slide for BPool
35K)
iA * 1111-
Projected General Fund deficit for 2005-06
much less than $1.9M anticipated.
Whys
MVLF came in $530K higher than budget
Interest earnings about $268K favorable due to higher
interest rates
TOT about $150K favorable due to increased
occupancy and higher hotel rates
Sales of surplus property not budgeted: Stadium
lands option $250K and KRCB land sale $356K
Kisco land sale $3:1 M and Vida Nueva Land
sale (Food Maxx site) $1.6M (to be paid in
three installments of $543K)
2.7M from sale of properties anticipated to be
used to balance General Fund, rest to go back
to General Fund. Endowment Reserve ($894K)
General .Fund Reserve will not be used.
FYOS-06 Budget Workshop
Public Safety
Fire Division Discussion
1- --- _ - -- -- - - . -
City of Rohnert Park - Fire Division Discussion
Comparison of Firefighter Salary and Mages Between RP and Neighboring Cities
First Step Top Step
Salary Benefits Total Salary Benefits Total
Rohnert Park 62,220.57 32,774.45 $94,995.02 75,513.21 37,012.62 $112,525.83
Petaluma 59,271.94 32,725.06 $91,997.00 1 72,060.66 37,198.62 $109,259.28
Santa Rosa 58,476.00 36,224.02 $94,700.02 70,200.00 40,601.76 $110,801.76
1
City of Rohnert Park - Fire Division Discussion
Comparison of Battalion Chief Salary and Wages
Between RP and Neighboring Cities
First Step
Salary . Benefits Total
Rohnert Park 85,886.76 40,966.65 $126,853.41
Petaluma 94,192.75 45,266.33 $1399459.08
Santa Rosa 91,860.00 49,389.04 $141,249.04
Top Step
Salary Benefits Total
104,389.20 46,973.84 $151,363.04
114,485.36 52,350.48 $166,835.84
119,100.00 59,560.46 $178,660.46
E
City of -Rohnert Park - Fire Division Discu'ssion
Sm Current Division 1 FTE
y
jx,.. r
c,
i,,,`,- meq. y.. stations FTE
f
LL stations 43 FTE
Recommendation s t o balance
NFPA and OSHA Standards.
3
City of Rohnert Park — Fire Division Discussion
taq
a i
IF S •
i I7 0 r w •. •e , • - I !•, ..
e
Minimum staffing of 4 personnel per engine or trucli
z 1 minute turn -out time
4 minutes first arrival
8 minutes full deployment
12
City of Rohnert Park - Fire Division Discussion
Nohnert Park DPS
Average Response Times
6 Minutes for Fires
Approximately 4-5 Minutes East of
Hwy. 101
Approximately 7-8 Minutes Test of
Hwy. 101
5 Minutes for Medicals
Approximately 3-4 Minutes East of
Hwy. 101
Approximately 6-7 Minutes West of
Hwy. 101 5
City Of ROhnert Park - Fire Division Discussion
Insurance Service Office (ISO) Rating System
Rohnert Park has a current ISO 4 rating, but DPS anticipates a
ISO 3 Rating when the next ratings are issued.
ISO Rate Schedule
City of Ronert Park — Fore Division Discussion
Current Fire Division — 2 staffed stations
FY05-06 Figures)
1 DPS Director (0.5) $96,536
1 Battalion Chief $1515363
2 Captains $2605624
14 Firefighters/Engineers $155755362
2 Fire Inspectors $ 225,052
20 Total Specialized Personnel $25308,937
7
City of Rohnert Park ® Fire Division Discussion
Fire Division Recommendation Applied to 2 Stations
n.
FV05-06 Figures)
1 DPS Director (0.5) 96,536
2 Battalion Chiefs 302,726
1 Fire Marshall 1669861
8 Captains 190429494
8 Engineers 9199737
8 Firefighters 9009207
2 Fire Inspectors 2259052
30 Total Specialized Personnel 396539613
n.
City of Rohnert Park - Fire Division Discussion
Fire Division Recommendation Applied to 3 Stations
FY05-06 Figures)
1 DPS Director (0.5)
3 Battalion Chiefs
1 Fire Marshall
12 Captains
12 Engineers
12 Firefighters
2 Fire Inspectors
43 Total Specialized Personnel
965536
454,089
166,861
1,563,741
1,379,605
1,350,310
225,052
5,236,195
0
City of Rohnert Park ® Fire Division Discussion
Fire Division Recommendation: separate Dept with 3 stations
FY05-06 Figures)
1 Chief
1 Asst. Chief
4 Battalion Chiefs
1 Fire Marshall
12 Captains
12 Engineers
15 Firefighters
2 Fire Inspectors
48 Total Specialized Personnel
193,073
175,000
605,452
166,861
195639741
1,379,605
1,687,887
225,052
5,996,672
t
Station 1 (HQ)
Unstaffed
Station 2 (Northern)
Staffed
Station 3 (Southwest)
Unstaffed
Station 4 (Southern)
Staffed
Rancho Adobe Station 1
Rancho Adobe Station 2
Rincon Valley Station 4
TABLE 1
Comparison of Fire Departments
Key Positions
Top of Range
Total Annual Cost - FY05-06
POSITION NEWARK ROCKLIN PETALUMA SANTA ROSA ROHNERT PARK
Firefighter 121,098 88,342 109,250 110,802 112,526
Fire Inspector 97,370 79,567 113,839 139,231 112,526
Engineer N/A 96,710 116,498 120,492 114,967
Captain 139,154 108,705 130,285 136,314 130,312
Fire Marshal 161,908 N/A 166,861 203,485 N/A
Battalion Chief. 144,948 96,216 114,485 119,100 151,363
Chief 203,544 1 126,324 145,662 153,120 193,073
Total Annual Cost represents annual salary and benefits. Benefits include medical, dental, vision, life insurance, long-term disability, and miscellaneous benefits.
Ely,
Comparison of. Fire Departments
Key Positions
Top of Range
Total Annual Cost - FY05-06
PSO
TABLE 2
RP Fire Department Staffing -- Recommended Levels
Estimated Personnel Costs
2 Stations - current
Annual Cost
FY05-06 Figures)
1 DPS Director (0.5) 96,536
2 Battalion Chiefs 302,726
1 Fire Marshall* 166,861
8 Captains 1,0427494
8 Engineers 919,737
8 Firefighters 900,207
2 Fire Inspectors 225,052
30 Total Specialized Personnel 3,653,613
3 Stations - addition of westside station
Annual Cost
FY05-06 Figures)
1 Chief 96,536
3 Battalion Chiefs 454,089
1 Fire Marshall* 166,861
12 Captains 1,563,741
12 Engineers 1,379,605
12 Firefighters 1,350,310
2 Fire Inspectors 225,052
43 Total Specialized Personnel 5,236,195
RP does not have a salary for this category.
Staff used the annual cost for the City of Petaluma.
NOTE: Cost figures represents maximum possible cost, as all positions are at top of range.
CONFIDENlik.-.
CLOSED
SESSION
E t.'-L }`.t ry' ' icy' k ^'`' Y ir',,,,.. ' 9s i-.r, sr a r`. {l"n.' a ., i "t
ihx1. .*§ct Ket de#t ,ypt•6 t:7`'Y+i r`w. :`a+s '%lsSDrL.t`€au r'..+,s„.ati,;?i i S.9 ,., . 4Q `'?;iv. k ri„,t?
.
"
.
927652v4 80078/0019
Memorandum
uounc»• X
rneci o- Miscellaneous
P Y q Communications p(j
J Agenda_ 3o pC(0 S e i
Copy to: Se-s'l ort
CoUv to: