5-9 Principles And Practices Of Foam OperationsPrinciples and Practices of
Foam Operations
Foam Fire Streams
Initially used for industrial and airport fire
protection
Types of foam
Chemical
Mechanical
Foam Components
Foam concentrate
Raw foam liquid at rest in storage container
Foam proportioner
Device that introduces foam concentrate into the water
stream to make the foam solution
Foam solution
The mixture of foam concentrate and water
Foam
Completed product after air is introduced
Class A
For normal combustible materials
Biodegradable
Corrosive
Super cleaning ability
Used for
Maximum absorption
Vertical surfaces
Or when a combination of both are needed
Class B
For flammable liquids
Two types for Class B fuels
Hydrocarbon fuels
Petroleum based and float on water
Polar solvent fuels
Liquids that are miscible in water or fuels that
absorb water
Regular Protein Foams
Derived from naturally occurring sources of
protein
Rarely used today
Very good heat stability and resists burn back
Not as mobile or fluid on the fuel surface as
other types of low-expansion
Fluoroprotein Foam
A combination protein-based and synthetic-
based foam
Has fluorochemical surfactants similar to
those for AFFF
Provides strong "security blanket" for long-
term vapor suppression
Can be formulated to be alcohol resistant by
adding ammonia
AFFF
Nearly completely synthetic
Has an air-/vapor-excluding film
Fast-moving foam blanket that drains water,
releasing more film
Ability to "heal" when foam blanket is
disturbed
Alcohol-resistant AFFFs are available from
most foam manufacturers
FFFP
Fluoroprotein foam with aqueous film-
forming foam (AFFF) capabilities
High-expansion Foams
Special-purpose foams
Detergent based
Low water content
Minimize water damage
Used in concealed spaces
Used in fire-extinguishing systems
How Foam Works
Separating
Creates barrier between fuel and fire
Cooling
Lowers the temperature of the fuel and adjacent
surfaces
Suppressing
Prevents release of flammable vapors
Proportioning
Class A
Normally mixed at ratios of 0.2% to 1%
Class B
Mixed at 1%-3% for hydrocarbons
Mixed at 3%-6% for polar solvents
Proportioning Methods
Induction (eduction)
Uses the pressure energy in fire stream to induct
(draft) foam concentrate
Injection
Uses an external pump or head pressure to force
foam concentrate into the fire stream at the
correct ratio
Proportioning Methods
Batch mixing
Foam concentrate poured directly into a tank of
water
Most simple method
Premixing
Premeasured portions of water and foam
concentrate are mixed in a container
In-line Eductors
Most common
Works off of the Venturi principle
Operational Rules
Must control flow through the system
Pressure at outlet must not exceed 65%-70%
of eductor inlet pressure
Foam concentration is only correct at rated
eductor inlet pressures
Operational Rules
Thoroughly flush after each use
Metering valves must be set to match foam
concentrate and burning fuel
Inlet to the eductor must not be more than 6
feet above the surface of the foam concentrate
Foam Nozzle Eductors
Operate on the same principles as the in-line
eductor
Major disadvantage
Foam concentrate must be located near the nozzle
Self-educting Master Stream Foam Nozzles
For flows in excess of 350 gpm
Designed to operate at lower pressures
May be used with a jet ratio controller
Apparatus-mounted Low Energy Systems
Majority of systems can be used for Class A
and Class B concentrates
Installed In-line Eductors
Operate on the same principles as the portable
in-line eductor
Can be supplied by pick-up tubes out of 5-
gallon buckets or by on-board foam tanks
Around-the-pump Proportioners
One of the most common
Consists of a small return (bypass) water line
connected from the discharge side of the
pump back to the intake side of the pump
An in-line eductor is positioned on this bypass
line
Around-the-pump Proportioners
Valve just off the discharge controls flow of
water through the bypass line
When valve is open, small amount of water
discharged from pump is directed through the
bypass piping
Water passing through the eductor draws
concentrate into the bypass piping
Around-the-pump Proportioners
Resulting foam solution supplied back to the
intake side of the pump
It is then pumped to the discharge and into the
hoseline
Around-the-pump Proportioners
Major disadvantage of older types
Cannot take advantage of incoming pressure
Inlet pressures >10 psi will prevent concentrate
from entering the intake
Can only be used when operating from the
apparatus water tank
Bypass-type Balanced Pressure Proportioners
Foam concentrate line connected to each
pump discharge outlet
Supplies foam concentrate to outlet at same
pressure the fire pump is supplying water to
that discharge
Bypass-type Balanced Pressure Proportioners
Pump discharge are jointly monitored by a
hydraulic pressure control valve
Concentrate supplied is delivered by size of
stream, relating to the overall discharge outlet
size
Bypass-type Balanced Pressure Proportioners
Primary advantage
Can monitor demand and adjust accordingly
Disadvantage
Can cause agitation of the stream
Variable-flow Variable-rate Direct Injection Systems
Injects concentrate directly into the water
stream
Amount delivered into the stream is based on
flow, not pressure
Advantages
Primary -Accurately adjust to changes within its
design limits
Also used with high energy foam systems
Disadvantage
Must be installed within the piping before any
discharge manifolds
Variable-flow Variable-rate Direct Injection Systems
Variable-flow Demand-type Balanced Pressure Proportioners
Basically a Venturi-type system within the
water line
Advantages
Concentrate flow and pressure match demand
Does not recirculate the concentrate back to the
foam tank(s)
Does not require flushing after use
Variable-flow Demand-type Balanced Pressure Proportioners
Disadvantages
Discharge ratio controllers reduce discharge area
Pressure drops across discharges are greater than
on regular pumps
Batch Mixing
Simplest means
Amount mixed is based on tank size
Disadvantages
Contaminates the water tank and pump
Does not allow for continuous operation
High Energy Foam Systems
Compressed Air Foam Systems
Compressed air introduced into foam solution
before discharge into hoseline
Turbulence of air and solution in the
pipe/hoseline creates a finished foam
Used with Class A foams
High Energy Foam Systems
Advantages
Greater reach
Uniform, durable bubbles
Adheres to surfaces
Hoselines are lighter
Disadvantages
Expensive
Hose reaction can be erratic
Additional training is necessary
Foam Application Devices
Handline nozzles
Solid bore
Fog
Air-aspirating
Master stream foam nozzles
Medium/high-expansion foam generating
devices
Associated with total flooding applications
Foam Storage
Pails
Barrels
Apparatus tanks
Expansion Ratios
Low expansion
Up to 50:1
Medium expansion
50:1 to 300:1
High expansion
300:1 to around 1250:1
Operational
Symptom: Failure to generate foam or
generating poor quality foam
Possible cause
Failure to match eductor and nozzle flow
No foam is in the pick-up tube
Possible corrective action
Check manufacturer's recommendations and
specifications for eductor and nozzle
Operational
Possible cause
Air leaks at fittings that cause loss of suction
Possible corrective action
Inspect and tighten all fittings
Remove defective components from operation
Operational
Possible cause
Dirty or clogged foam passages from improper
cleaning
Possible corrective action
Clean all proportioning equipment components
after each use
Operational
Possible cause
Partially closed nozzle control that results in a
higher nozzle pressure
Possible corrective action
Open nozzle control completely
Operational
Possible cause
Too long a hose lay on the discharge side of the
eductor
Possible corrective action
Reduce hose lay to recommended length
Operational
Possible cause
Kinked hose
Possible corrective action
Unkink hose
Troubleshooting
Possible cause
Nozzle too far above eductor causing excessive
elevation pressure
Possible corrective action
Lower nozzle
Reposition hose configuration
Troubleshooting
Possible cause
Mixing different types of foam concentrates
Possible corrective action
Use foam only as recommended