2015/03/10 City Council Resolution 2015-043RESOLUTION NO. 2015-043
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE DESIGN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT RE: EASTSIDE TRUNK SEWER PHASE
III AND SNYDER LANE WIDENING PROJECT NO. 2014-01 WITH GHD INC.
WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park General Plan and Public Facilities Finance Plan
describe the Eastside Trunk Sewer and Snyder Lane Widening as infrastructure necessary to
support new development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park (City) has contracted with GHD Inc. (Consultant)
for studies, design, and construction management support of the Eastside Trunk Sewer since
2004; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park Municipal Code Title 3 Chapter 3.04 provides that the
City's purchasing functions shall be governed by the city's purchasing policy; and
WHEREAS, consistent with the Purchasing Policy Section 3.6.6(D), and in accordance with
City Council Resolution 2014-010 adopted on February 11, 2014, the City awarded the "Design
Professional Services Agreement Re: Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase III and Snyder Lane Widening
Project No. 2014-01" to Consultant in the amount of $377,485.00 on a sole source basis due to their
expertise and extensive knowledge of the Eastside Trunk Sewer; and
WHEREAS, because of changes to the project scope, most specifically the inclusion of
the Community Center Parking Lot overlay with the scope, on July 8, 2014 by City Council
Resolution 2014-076A, the City approved the First Amendment to the Design Professional
Services Agreement Re: Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase III and Snyder Lane Widening Project No.
2014-01" with Consultant in the amount of $ 117,392.00, bringing the total amount of the
contract to $494,880; and
WHEREAS, the City has requested additional modifications to Consultant's scope
including additional traffic counts at the Rancho Cotate High School entrance, additional overlay
on Snyder Lane between Southwest Boulevard and East Cotati Avenue, additional widening of
Snyder Lane between Medical Center Drive and San Francisco Drive and the inclusion of design
services during construction; and
WHEREAS, Consultant has provided a proposal for these additional services in the
amount of $546,408.00 bringing the total contract value to $1,041,288.00, which includes
$218,093 in additional design services and $328,315 in new design services during construction;
and
WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated this proposal and finds that the proposed costs
represent a reasonable proportion of the estimated construction costs; and
WHEREAS, the City's Finance Director has been authorized to make the appropriations
necessary to cover these additional contract services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert
Park that it does hereby authorize and approve the second amendment to the Design Professional
Services Agreement RE: Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase III and Snyder Lane Widening Project No.
2014-01 with GHD Inc.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed
to take all actions to effectuate this amendment for and on behalf of the City of Rohnert Park,
including execution, if necessary, in substantially similar form to the amendment attached hereto
as Exhibit "A," subject to minor modifications by the City Manager or City Attorney.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 10th day of March, 2015.
ATTEST:
oAnne M. Buergler, City Ark
Attachments: Exhibit A
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
1�
Amy O. Ahanotu, Mayor
CALLINAN: MC- MACKENZIE: M6 STAFFORD: N16 BELFORTE: PN E AHANOTU: P'f(Z'
AYES: NOES: ( O ) ABSENT: (J ) ABSTAIN
2015-043
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLTUION
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH GHD, INC. FOR THE EASTSIDE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE III,
AND SNYDER LANE WIDENING PROJECT NO. 2014-01
This Second Amendment to the Design Professional Services Agreement with GHD Inc. for the Eastside
Trunk Sewer Phase III and Snyder Lane Widening Project No. 2014-11 ("Second Amendment) between
the City of Rohnert Park ("City") and GHD, Inc., ("Consultant") is entered into as of the day of
, 2015, ("Effective Date"), by and between City and Consultant.
RECITALS
A. City and Consultant are parties to that certain Agreement entitled "Design Professional Services
Agreement Re: Eastside Trunk Sewer, Phase III, and Snyder Lane Widening Project No. 2014-
01 " dated February 11, 2014, and authorized through Resolution No. 2014-010 approved by the
City Council on February 11, 2014, for the amount of $377,485.00.
B. City and Consultant entered into a First Amendment to the Agreement dated July 8, 2014, and
authorized through Resolution No. 2014-076A, which increased value of the agreement by
$117,392 for a maximum of $494,880.00, primarily to cover increased design services associated
with adding the Community Center Parking Lot Overlay to the project.
C. City and Consultant now desire to enter into this Second Amendment to provide for additional
work as described below.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual promises, the parties hereby amend the
Agreement as follows:
1. Scope of Services. In addition to the services provided under the Agreement and the First
Amendment, Consultant shall provide additional design services, bid services and services during
construction as described in the attached Exhibit A.
2. Compensation. Consultant shall perform the services described in this Second Amendment for a total
not -to -exceed amount of $546,408.00, thus increasing the total not to exceed amount of the
Agreement to $1,041,288.00.
3. Agreement in Effect. Except as amended by the First and Second Amendments, the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.
4. Counterpart Signatures. This Second Amendment may be signed in multiple counterparts which,
when signed by all parties, shall constitute a binding agreement.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the date first written
above.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK:
By: /
Darrin Jenkins, City Manager (Date)
Per Resolution No. 2015- adopted by the Rohnert Park
City Council at its meeting of March 10, 2015
GHD, INC.:
By: /
Name: (Date)
Title:
By:
1 Updated: 2010-06-21
M:\WGPLAN\Dara Files -City Council\2015\3-1()-15\ESTS3-Snvder Lane Budget and Conlracls\bones\E07_ESTS3-Snyder_Resolution Exhibit A_Phase
III Design Amend 2_2015-03-10.docx
ATTEST: Name: (Date)
Title:
JoAnne M. Buergler, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
0)
Updated: 2010-06-21
M:\WGPLAN\Data Files - Cily Council\2015\3-10-15\ESTS3-Snvder Lane Budgel and C0n1rac1s\b0nes\E07_ESTS3-Snyder_Resolution Exhibit A_Phase
III Design Amend 2_2015-03-10.doex
EXHIBIT A to
Amendment 2
February 9, 2015
Ms. Mary Grace Pawson, PE
City Engineer
City of Rohnert Park
130 Avram Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
RE: Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase 3 and Snyder Lane Widening
Amendment 2 — Additional Services and Scope
Dear Mary Grace,
Ref: 8411099
GHD is pleased to submit the following proposed amendment for professional engineering services for
the Eastside Trunk Sewer (ESTS) Phase 3 and Snyder Lane Widening Project (the "Project"). This
proposal includes additional services and scope (project area) for the project's design phase that were
identified during project development and coordination with adjacent projects. The proposal is based on
our current understanding of the project from our work on this phase of the trunk sewer and road
widening, the project design criteria and specifications prepared for ESTS Phase 2, and recent
discussions with City staff.
Due to timing constraints for project construction, this proposal also includes bid and construction phase
services, which are also based on our current understanding of the project. Construction phase services
include engineering services (i.e., submittal and RFI review). Construction management and inspection is
not covered under this proposal.
Project Understanding
The Project is at the hub of extensive ongoing development and upcoming construction activity in this part
of the City. Because of this dynamic, the project has evolved during development to include additional
scope, additional tasks, and further engineering analysis to better coordinate with the other projects and
understand the ultimate project functionality.
For example, the project limits have expanded to the north and south, expanding the overall scope. The
timing of the project and synchronization with other projects (PG&E Rule 20, LID Development, etc.) have
required that some elements of the project be accelerated (tree removal, storm drain installation, PG&E
gas coordination), expanding overall tasks and coordination efforts. The City has also requested that
supplemental analysis be performed to better understand project operations (traffic counts and modeling).
In addition to the scope and services noted above, the steps have increased as well. Due to the
complexity of the project, the increasing scope of work, and the formal peer review process, a 100%
project submittal was included in the project delivery schedule prior to the 75% project submittal review.
These various items have been captured, as closely as possible under the following tasks and new tasks
to this contract are noted as "new task":
• Task 2 Environmental Compliance and Permitting
• Task 5 Supplemental Survey
GHD Inc. 2235 Mercury Way Suite 150 Santa Rosa CA 95407 USA
T 1 707 523 1010 F 1 707 527 8679 E santarosa@ghd corn W www ghd.com
• Task 6 Preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates
• Task 7 Project Management and QAQC
• Task 8 Outreach and Coordination
• Task 10 Supplemental Traffic Engineering (new task)
• Task 11 Bid Phase Support Services (new task)
• Task 12 Engineering Services During Construction (ESDC) (new task)
• Task 13 Tree Removal Package (new task)
A description of the project understanding for the NEW scope of work for Task 10, Supplemental Traffic
Engineering, Task 11 Bid Phase Support Services, and Task 12 ESDC are provided below. The
understanding of the original tasks still remains and is substantially the same; only the key augmentations
for those existing tasks are noted here.
Scope of Services
Task 2 Environmental Compliance and Permitting
Additional efforts include the following tasks:
• bat habitat assessment for removal of trees during a "non -window" tree removal operation
• update of the CEQA document for work on the west side of the bridge in Copeland Creek
Task 5 Supplemental Survey
Additional efforts include the following tasks:
• survey reference staking for placement of boxes/pads for Rule 20 (school parcel)
• update of the topo with additional information from UD
• additional survey for north transition
Task 6 Preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates
Additional efforts include the following tasks:
• preparation of 100% submittal package (between scoped 90% and final submittals); includes civil,
structural, electrical, traffic, hydraulic, landscape architecture, geotech, CAD,
• structural design of the west -side matching barrier and wingwalls at Copeland Creek
• overlay of the southbound lanes of Snyder between Southwest Blvd and East Cotati Ave
• additional design for northerly transition and active pedestrian crossing
• water services
Task 7 Project Management and QAQC
Additional efforts include the following tasks:
• management related to extensive coordination with adjacent projects
• management related to development and completion of additional scope of work items
• evaluation related to pre -purchase of materials and outreach to vendors
• management and QAQC of 100% submittal
Task 8 Outreach and Coordination
Additional efforts include the following tasks:
• Original scope of work for PG&E coordination included the Rule 20 undergrounding effort; it was
subsequently determined during the work on the Brookfield storm drain trunk in Snyder that
additional coordination with PG&E for gas distribution line relocation along Snyder Lane in
coordination with the project's gas crossing relocation was required. This triggered a gas conflict
review site -wide. Efforts also include introduction of a casing in our project to allow the gas
crossing to be done on the City's construction schedule.
• Original scope of work for PG&E coordination included the Rule 20 undergrounding;
subsequently it was determined that additional coordination with PG&E for unforeseen electrical
distribution work north of channel was required
• PG&E has had three points of contact for the Rule 20 project since the start. Additional
coordination meetings and time was required to walk the site and educate the point of contact
about the project scope, schedule and issues.
• additional coordination with school regarding easements (staking of easements)
Task 10 Supplemental Traffic Engineering
10.1 Traffic Counts
In order to verify the adequacy of the proposed intersection and access changes to Rancho Cotate High
School, new existing traffic counts will be collected, adapted to the revised access configuration, and
analyzed. Future volumes will be forecast based on the consolidated traffic data for the three eastside
specific plans based on new traffic data at the project intersections and driveways. GHD will collect new
peak hour traffic counts at 5 project specific locations, during three peak periods (am, midday, pm).
Including;
Snyder Lane at:
1. North Rancho Cotate High Driveway
2. Camino Corto
3. Drop-off Exit
4. Drop-off Entry
5. Southwest Blvd
10.2 Intersection Geometry and Control Evaluation
Following the collection of existing data, GHD will validate and redistribute the project traffic based on the
proposed design and access configuration. GHD will verify the adequacy of the various intersection
design elements, including the intersection phasing, geometry, and left -turn pocket lengths for existing
conditions.
Using the consolidated traffic report for the 3 eastside specific plans, traffic conditions will be forecast to
the cumulative future year (2040) to validate the intersection geometry and control design.
The findings of the evaluation will be presented in a technical memo along with the traffic counts.
Task 11 Bid Phase Support Services
11.1 Prepare Draft Staff Report
Prepare draft staff report (approx. 20 days prior to bid opening) for the City's use when awarding the
project.
11.2 Prepare Project Addenda
Prepare addenda (up to 2) using the City's addendum form and distribute to all known plan holders. The
City will post the addenda on the City website. See the fee estimate for the assumed level of effort for this
task.
11.3 Prepare Notice to Bid
3
Prepare advertisement for bids and submit Notice to Bidders to the local newspaper (Community Voice)
and the City's five local Trade Journals/Plan Check Houses approx. 30 calendar days prior to the bid
opening. Any costs charged by the Community Voice and/or the Trade Journals/Plan Check Houses will
be covered directly by the City (direct bill to the City; not included in GHD project fee estimate).
11.4 Bid Document Duplication and Distribution
Duplicate and distribute bid packages to local building exchanges and Contractors/sub-Contractors.
Maintain list of plan holders. Collect payment for bid packages to offset duplication costs.
The fee estimate associated with this scope of services includes an initial purchase of twelve (12) bid
packages (one spiral or screw bound bid document accompanied by one full-size (2204) paper plan set)
to use for distribution from GHD's office and/or distribution to builder's exchanges. Additional bid package
requests from plan holders will be handled on an on -demand basis (additional copy(ies) to be made
following request).
11.5 Attend Pre -Bid Meeting and Site Walk
Attend one pre-bid meeting at the City office and a site walk to field questions from interested parties.
GHD will prepare a written record of attendance and items discussed.
This scope of services assumes that the City will also attend the pre-bid meeting and site walk and be
available along with the GHD project team in attendance to answer questions from attendees.
Comments and questions received during the pre-bid meeting and site walk may form the basis for
sending out an addendum. This will be discussed by the City and GHD following the meeting.
11.6 Respond to Plan Holder Questions and RFI's
Respond to questions from plan holders and document the responses. Depending on the nature of the
questions received, responses may be verbal over the phone or incorporated into an addendum.
11.7 Prepare Conformed Construction Documents
Incorporate addenda into conformed set of plans and specifications. This scope of services only includes
CAD revision for noting "Conformed", or similar, on the plans.
The fee estimate for this task includes reproduction of four (4) complete conformed PS&E sets to be
retained by GHD for use during the construction phase by the design and CM teams, as well as two (2)
copies for the City and six (6) copies for the contractor.
Deliverables:
• Stamped/Signed full-size Conformed Plans (8 copies for City/Contractor)
• Stamped/Signed, Conformed Specifications with addenda (8 copies for City/Contractor)
• CD electronic copy of Conformed Plans and Specifications
11.8 Bid Result Tabulation
Attend public bid opening at the City office. Verify completeness of bid packages. Tabulate bid results and
provide letter of Recommendation of Award (staff report) to the City.
This scope of services assumes that the City will organize the bid opening and open the bids.
4
Deliverables: Bid Notice and advertisement; Addenda; Bid Tab; and Letter of Recommendation
of Award (staff report).
Task 12 Engineering Services During Construction (ESDC)
12.1 Attend Partnering/Pre-Construction Meeting
The project manager, lead project engineer, landscape lead and geotechnical lead will attend the
partnering/pre-construction meeting at City offices. It is assumed that this task will be completed in a
single day.
12.2 Review Contractor Submittals
GHD will provide review and comments for technical submittals required per the contract documents.
Submittals will be logged, checked for completeness, and issued for review by the City's representative,
and all review comments by GHD will be submitted directly to the City's representative using a standard
written format. In general, incomplete submittals will be immediately rejected. The budgeted amount of
labor for GHD is based on an average of 4 hours per submittal and a total of 75 submittals. For budgeting
purposes, approximately 33% of the submittals are assumed to require re -submittal and is an estimate
only.
The budgeted amount of labor for Jacobs is based on review of 8 original submittals and up to 4 related
resubmittals for a total of up to 12 submittal reviews. Quadriga's effort for landscape architecture includes
assistance on up to 10 submittals.
Actual requirements, including the time required for each submittal review, could vary. If the budgeted
effort may be exceeded, GHD will notify the City and provide a proposal for the revised estimated effort.
Note: Submittals are assumed to be packaged and coordinated per the Contract Documents (i.e.,
shoring, soil stabilization, and dewatering submitted together and coordinated; traffic, pedestrian, and
bicycle control submitted together and coordinated).
12.3 Review Contractor RFPs/RFC's
GHD will respond to formal Requests for Information (RFI's) and Requests for Clarification (RFC's) issued
by the City's representative. Routine RFI's/RFC's that do not relate to design intent are assumed to be
handled by the City's representative. All RFI's/RFC's sent to GHD will be logged, documented, and
communicated to GHD using a standard written format. The budgeted amount of labor is based on an
average of approximately 6 hours per RFI/RFC, plus administrative and clerical time, and 40 RFIs/RFCs
and is an estimate only.
The budgeted amount of labor for Jacobs is based on review of 4 geotechnical -related RFI's/RFC's.
Quadriga's effort for landscape architecture assistance assumes up to 4 RFI's/RFC's.
Actual requirements, including the time required for each RFI/RFC review, could vary. If the budgeted
effort may be exceeded, GHD will notify the City and provide a proposal for the revised estimated effort.
12.4 Construction Changes
GHD will review proposed construction change orders involving design intent and provide design services
to implement the change orders at the request of the City. It is assumed that proposed change orders will
be issued by the City's representative using a standard written format, and that GHD will respond directly
5
to the City's representative. The budgeted amount of labor is based on an average of 16 hours per
construction change order, plus administrative and clerical time, and a total of 8 change orders and is an
estimate only.
Actual requirements could vary, including the time required for each construction change. If the budgeted
effort may be exceeded, GHD will notify the City and provide a proposal for the revised estimated effort.
GHD will maintain a status log for change order requests on a daily basis as necessary.
12.5 Construction Meetings
GHD will attend various construction and progress meetings during the course of construction. GHD's
project manager and/or lead engineer will generally attend the meetings, with other staff attending when
appropriate. The budgeted amount of labor is based on attendance at 15 meetings and is an estimate
only.
GHD will also attend a punchlist walkthrough prior to substantial completion.
12.6 Construction Phase Consultation
GHD will provide consultation to the City and the City's representative during the Project. Work is
anticipated to include the following:
• Response to informal RFIs that do not necessitate a formal RFI process;
• Consultation for the implementation of mitigation and permit -related construction issues; and
• Consultation related to handling of potentially or known contaminated soil and/or groundwater.
12.7 Periodic Geotechnical Observations of Construction
Jacobs Associates (GHD subconsultant) will provide periodic observations of geotechnical -related
construction, including during start-up of key elements such as dewatering well construction, trenching,
soil stabilization, placement of foundation material, pipe bedding and embedment, CLSM, and trench
backfilling. During the site visits, Jacobs will observe and document the progress of work, conformance of
subsurface geotechnical conditions (soils and groundwater) as encountered by the contractor with those
described in the project geotechnical report(s), and conformance of contractor work with reviewed
submittals. The budget for this task is based on a 15 -month construction schedule, and includes making
up to six (6) site visits. Observations reports will serve as reporting documentation for the project; there is
no budget allowance to prepare a final summary report.
12.8 Prepare Record Drawings
GHD will incorporate as -built markups provided by the Contractor and provide the City with one set of
record drawings meeting the Section E requirements for "as -built" drawings.
12.9 Project Management and Coordination
GHD will coordinate with the City and the construction manager, including subconsultants, in providing
engineering support during the construction phase of the project. Effort will include: budget and schedule
tracking; project and contract oversight; coordination/communication with the City; and monthly progress
reports. The budget for this task is based on 8 hours per month during a 15 -month construction schedule,
plus administrative time.
C
This task does not include preparation/review of submittals, RFI/RFC's, and change order request logs.
Those, and other tasks, are included under the various other ESDC tasks above.
Task 13 Tree Removal Package
13.1 Tree Removal PS&E and Bid Phase Support
In order to meet the overall project schedule and complete the work in front of Rancho Cotate High
School, approximately 67 trees along the easterly project frontage required removal.
Work includes preparation of plans, specifications and estimate for removal of the trees. Services also
include coordination with the School District, bat habitat consultant, utilities, and City Staff. GHD to
provide bid phase services as an extention of staff: reach out to four contractors, solicit bids, respond to
bidder questions, hold pre-bid meeting, prepare notes, contact lumber mill for delivery pre -authorization,
and provide schedule coordination with stakeholders and City.
Subtasks included the following:
• preparation of the tree removal plans, specifications and estimate
• project management of tree removal process
• attend meetings
• bid phase support services
o contact contractors
o host pre-bid walk
o respond to contractor questions
Assumptions
• GHD will not be responsible for site safety at any construction site;
• GHD and its subconsultants should be named as additional insured under the contractor's liability
insurance; and
• Contractor and/or City will be responsible to provide the services of an independent testing
laboratory to perform all inspections, tests, and approvals of samples, materials, and equipment
required by the Bid Documents. Testing associated with alternate materials (e.g., import
aggregate used in lieu of CLSM) will also be the Contractor's responsibility.
Services Not Included
The following services are not included in the scope of work:
• Preparation of permit application documents. The Scope of Services assumes that the Contractor
will prepare and submit all permit applications and administer all permit requirements for the
project;
• Preparation of additional Bid Documents or Contract Documents for alternate bids or prices
requested by the City for the project or a portion thereof;
• Preparation of CEQA documentation;
• Public outreach;
• Construction staking, surveying, and testing;
• Construction observation and inspection services, including specialty inspections, other than
those services specifically included in the Scope of Services;
• Preparation of record drawings; and
VA
• Other services performed or furnished by GHD not otherwise provided herein for the Scope of
Services.
City Responsibilities
In addition to other responsibilities of the City as set forth in the Scope of Services, the City shall at its
expense:
• Attend the partnering/pre-construction meeting, and other job related meetings;
• Provide third -party construction management;
• Provide labor compliance as required by project funding, permit requirements, or other project
requirements not provided in GHD's Scope of Services;
• Provide certified appraiser and negotiate easements with various property owners if/as
necessary;
• Provide the services of an independent testing laboratory to perform all inspections, tests, and
approvals of samples, materials, and equipment required by the Bid Documents, or to evaluate
the performance of materials, equipment, and facilities of the District, prior to their incorporation
into the work with appropriate professional interpretation thereof; and
• Provide GHD with the findings and reports generated by the entities providing services to the
City.
Project Schedule
The project schedule has been updated throughout project development and discussed with City staff. At
this stage, it is anticipated that the next submittal, the 100%, will be made on February 19, 2015.
The UD Development has already started construction within the limits of this Project, and PG&E is
anticipated to start construction in March or April 2015. Our project is on track for start of construction in
June 2015, with a 15 -month construction duration.
Project Team
The following GHD/team personnel are assigned as project or technical leads for this project:
• Project Director — Matt Winkelman, PE
• Project Manager — Bill Silva, PE, QSD
• Lead Engineer — Steve Grupico, PE, LEED AP
• Landscape Architect — Bill Mastic (Quadriga)
• Geotechnical Engineer (Utilities)— Dru Nielson, PG, CEG (Jacobs Associates)
• Geotechnical Engineer (Roadway/Paving) — Eric Chase, PG (RGH)
Fee Estimate
The estimated fee for professional services for the Scope of Services (Tasks 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12)
is $546,408. The budget estimate is provided in the attached fee spreadsheet. In total, the bid and
construction phase budgets represent approximately 4.1 percent of the anticipated project construction
cost. Industry average is between 3-5 percent. A similar check for the design services: the total contract
for design, permitting, and coordination/project management is 8.7% of the construction cost. This is
within the 7-10% range typically held in the industry for design services alone. Given the complexity of
this project, the high level of coordination with the University District and High School, and the
coordination of the underground utilities district, the higher percentage would be anticipate.
Closing
Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding the scope of work. I can be
reached at (707) 523-1010. Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City of Rohnert Park.
Sincerely,
GHD Inc.
William Silva P.E.
Project Manager
(707) 523-1010
Attachment: Fee Estimate Spreadsheet
9
GHD
Project Name:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Job Number:
ATTACHMENT 1 - GHD PROJECT FEE ESTIMATING SHEET
Eastside Trunk Sewer Phase 3 and Snvder Lane Widenina - AMENDMENT 2 EXHIBIT B to
Bill Silva
Matt Winkelman
8411099
Amendment 2
Client: City of Rohnert Park
Date: February 9. 2015
'OTHER DIRECT COSTS include telephone, mileage, printing, photocopies and other miscellaneous direct expenses
2/10/2015 Page 1
LABOR COSTS
FEE'. COMPUTATION
Task /Item
LABOR CATEGORY a
RATE n
PD
$185
/Hr
QA/QC
$225
/Hr
Constr I
Review
$190
/Hr
Project
Manager
$210
IHr
Sr, Proj.
Engr.
$185
/Hr
Proj.
Engr.
$145
/Hr
Public
Outreach
$125
IHr
Snr
Traffic
$185
/Hr
Struct.
Eng
$155
/Hr
Staff Eng
II
$130
/Hr
Staff Eng
1
$115
/Hr
Senior
Geologist
$155
/Hr
San{or
Planner
$145
/Hr
Planner I
Scientist
$115
/Hr
LLS
$140
/Hr
P•Pcrson
Crew
$280
IHr
CAD
$125
/Hr
Adminf
Graphics
$100
IHr
TOTAL
HOURS
"OTHER
DIRECT
COSTS
SUB
Valerius I
Tatarian
Env/Bio
SUB
Counts
Unlimited
Traf Cts
SUBSUB
Jacobs
Associates
Geotech
RGH
(CM Contract)
SUS
Quadriga
LA
TOTAL FEE
TASK 2 Environmental compliance llance and Permlttln
2 1 Permitting - 13 at Habitat .AssassmenUMl upon Plari0c
2
1
1
1
1
16
30
1
1
8
56
5336
$5,5001
1
1 $12,826
2.2 Specification Review no chane _
0
Sol
I $0
2,3 CEQA Addendum new
401
70
161
126
$7561
1
L $16,206
SUBTOTAL TASK 2
01
01
01
21
01
0
0
01
01
01
01
01
561
1001
01
01
ul
241
182
$1,0921
$5.5001
$01
$0
$0
$0
$29,032
TASK 5 Supplemental Survey5
_
51 Supplemental Survey Efforts
I
1 41
1 10
241
81
161
1 62
$5641
1
1
1
1 $10.454
SUBTOTAL TASK 5
1 01
0
01
41
01
101
0
01
01
0
01
01
101
01
161
81
161
01
62
5564
$0
$0
$01
$0
$0
$10,454
TASK 6 Preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates
6 1 Prepare 75% PS&E no change)
p
$0
6.2 Prepare 00% PS&E
1 61
16
40
16
24
16
40
_ 12
170
$2,020
$1,900
$28.910
6,21 Prepare 100% PS&E new
201
24
1 4,
24
100
30
12
40
30
110
16
470
$3,820
$5,037
$81 747
63 Prepare Final PS&E
4
16
12
20
4
B
20
8
92
$1,552
$600
$16332
6.4 Submittal Review Meetings
1 2
1 2
2.
8
$48
- _
$150
$1.648
SUBTOTALTASK61
321
24
01
98
361
162
0
52
76
40
54
0
0
0
0
0
170'
36
740
$7,440
$0
$0
$n
$0
$7 fi87
-13,637
TASK 7 Project Mana emcni and OAOC
_
7 1 Project Management and QAOC 100%/new work/etc
41
0
11
50
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
.
8
86
$516
$200
$16-596
SUBTOTAL TASK 7
4
0
8
50
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0'
0
0
0
9
0
86
$516I
Sol_
$0
$0
$0
$2001
$16,596
TASK 8 Outreach and Coordination
0 1 Schnot District Coordinalloi
4
2
1
1
2
8$48
$1,378
8.2 PG&E and Utilities C=dinatien
- - -
3
32
16
12
1
64
$384
Y 1$734
B.3 Ad"acerit Owner Outronch
2
2
_
_
_ 4
_
$24
SUBTOTAL TASK 8
1 31
01
01
381
01
201
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
0
01
01
12
3
78
$4561
50
$0
$01
$0
$13.691
TASK 10 Supplemental Traffic Engineering new
-.$01
10.1 'traffic Counts
1
1
21
if
1 31
1
1
1
1
5
$301
1 $1,650
1_
$2.525
10.2 Inlarsection Geome4y and Control Evaluation
I
I
I
1 11
21
1 1411
1
1
1
1 2t
1 34
$2041
1
1
1
_1
1
1 $5.494
SUBTOTAL TASK 101
DI
01
01
11
01
4
0
17
_ 01
151
01
01
01
01
I
01
2
0
39
$2341,$0
$1,650
$0
$0
$0
$8,019
TASK 11 Bid Phase Support Services new
11 1 Prepare Draft Staff Report
3
3
_
1
7
$42
$1.372
11.2 Pr re P--ectAddenda
2'
16'
12
20
4
2
2
2
16
8
86
$516
$14.166
11.3 Pre re Nollca tp Btd
2
4
6
336
$1 036
11.4 Bid Document Du lication and Distribution
4
20
24
$2,544
_
$5.124
11.5 Attend Pre -Bid Meeting and Site Walk
4
4
4
12
$72
52.232.
11 6 Res and to Plan Holder Questions and RFI's
2
2
8
12
$72
$1,700
$2,400
SG. 122
11.7 Pre are Conformed Construction Documents
1
2'
iql
I
i
24
16
59
1
$10319
11 8 Bid Result Tabulation
1
1
1
1
8
12
_ _$2,754
$72
$2.037
SUBTOTAL TASK 111
11
41
21
301
221
641
01
41
21
21
01
01
il
21
01
01
401
44
218
$8,108
$01
So
$1,7001
$0
$2,400
$42,408
TASK 12 Engineering Services During Construction ESDC new
121 All and Partnwirt-IPre-ConstmotoonMae tr
6
6
6
18
$1013
$1,200
$4,548
12.2 Review Contractor Submittals (up to 75
36
40
70
320
16
24
75
581
$3.486
$5,500
$99.016
12.3 Rev iew.Contractor RFPs1RFC's (up to 40
10
10
20
60
100
_ _
24
20
40
284
$1,704
$6,500
$52,324
12.4 Construction Changes (uto 8
4
6
24
20
60
20
10.
144
$864
- -
$23,894
12.5 Construction Meetings In 15
30
20
45
_
_ a
103
$618
$3,900
$21,843
12 6 Construction Phase Consultation
4
40
30
50
4
4
4
16
4
156
$936
$4.800
$32,536
12 7 Periodic Geolechnical Observations of Construction
0
$0
$3.900
$3.900
12.8 Prepare Record Drawngs
16
120
136
$816
518.13E
12 9 Proiect Management and Coordination
12
1
1 1081
1
1 151
135
$8101
1
1 $2.5001
29,710
SUBTOTAL TASK 12
301
521
01
2681
2061
597
0
20
52
0
0
4
161
01
4
0
160
148
155_7
$9,342
$0
$0
$23,500
$0
$4,800
$285,907
TASK 13 Tree Removal Package new
13..1 Tree Removal PS&E and Bid Phase Su ort new
4
4
32
8
- 2
2
4
8
G4.
$384
$11,664
SUBTOTAL TASK 13
4
4
0
32
0
8
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
4
8..
64
$384
$0.
$0
$0
$0
$0
$11.664
Contingency
ConlIngency
I
I
1 01
$o
$D
CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
0
0
0-
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
i6
0
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
PROJECT TOTALS
74
84
10
523
268
869
0
93
90
57
56
4
73
104
20
8
412
2711.
3,024 $ 26,136
1 $ 5,500
1 $ 1,650
1 $ 25,200
1 $
$ 15,087
$ 546.408
'OTHER DIRECT COSTS include telephone, mileage, printing, photocopies and other miscellaneous direct expenses
2/10/2015 Page 1