Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1999/12/14 City Council Agenda Packet
f City of Rohnert Park • 6750 Commerce Boulevard • Rohnert Park, California 94928 ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL sr/ Community Development Commission /- ' "e kRohnert Park Financing Authority ' Rohnert Park District - * S\ CONCURRENT MEETINGS `� AGENDA !N.,,q,..,,:: N % WO/ Tuesday, December 14, 1999 -- 6:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION - COUNCIL WILL MEET IN CLOSED SESSION IN THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE PRIOR TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING TO CONSIDER: •Personnel matters(G.C. 54957) 7:00 p.m. REGULAR SESSION - Open Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call (Flores Mackenzie_ Spiro_Vidak-Martinez Reilly ) 1. Mayor's Report on Closed Session (G.C. 54957.1) 2. Approval of Minutes - November 23, 1999 concurrently for: • City Council • Community Development Commission • Rohnert Park Financing Authority 3. Approval of Bills/Demands for Payment concurrently for: • City of Rohnert Park/City Council • Community Development Commission 4. Adding non-agendaed items to agenda (if any) Non-agendaed items are added to the agenda for information only; no deliberation will occur and no action will be taken on any non-agendaed item discussed at this City Council meeting. 7:05 p.m. 5. YOUTH REPRESENTATIVE to the CITY COUNCIL from 1999-2000 Youth of the Year Program selections 1) Recognizing Youth Representatives: Senior Melissa Canning& Juniors Jackie Snyder and Daniel Cronin • Youth report/comments, if any 2) Other Youth comments, if any This time is signified on the Council meeting agenda to provide the opportunity for other youths of the community to ask questions, make announcements &/or share comments on other youth related matters 7:10 p.m. 6. SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATED STUDENTS,INC. REPRESENTATIVE • Recognizing SSU Associated Students, Inc. Representative Senior Brian Talbot • SSU Report/comments, if any Rohner(Park City Council Agenda (2) December 14, 1999 7:15 p.m. 7. SCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES: 1) Joe Perry, President-Elect, Christmas in April *Rohnert Park re. progress report 2) Herb Cody, Director, Sonoma County Martial Arts re. contribution to purchase a world globe for the children's section of the new library. For items to be listed on the agenda, written requests must be submitted to the City Manager's Office prior to finalization of meeting agendas, i.e. by noon on the Tuesdays preceding City Council meetings regularly scheduled on the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays of each month 7:25 p.m. 8. MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS Certificates of Recognition for Contributions to the New Library to: • O'DELL PRINTING for 2000 Brochures Supporting the Library/Float Project • YARDBIRDS for Building Materials to Support the Library/Float Project • COMMUNITY VOICE for Publicity Supporting the Library/Float Project • GROSSI FARMS for Hot Air Balloon to Support the Library/Float Project • BROWNIE TROOP 338 for Float Munchkins Supporting the Library/Float Project • ROHNERT PARK/COTATI FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY for Fund Raising and Booth Staff in Support of the Library/Float Project • SONOMA COUNTY MARTIAL ARTS for funds to purchase World Globe for the Children's Section of the New Library 7:30 p.m. 9. Unscheduled public appearances: For public comment on agenda items or other matters (limited to 3-5 minutes per appearance&a 30 minute total time limit,or allocation of time based on number of speaker cards submitted) NOTE: Time shown for any particular matter on the agenda is an estimate only. Matters may be considered earlier or later than the time indicated depending on the pace at which the meeting proceeds. If you wish to speak on an item under discussion by the Council which appears on this agenda, after receiving recognition from the Mayor,please walk to the rostrum and state your name and address for the record. -PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO SPEAKING- Any item raised by a member of the public which is not agendized and may require Council action shall be automatically referred to staff for investigation and disposition which may include placing on a future agenda. If the item is deemed to be an emergency or the need to take action arose after posting of the agenda within the meaning of Government Code Section 54954.2(b), Council is entitled to discuss the matter to determine if it is an emergency item under said Government Code and may take action thereon. DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability which requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this City Council meeting, please contact the City Offices at (707) 588-2200 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation by the City. Please make sure the City Manager's office is notified as soon as possible if you have a visual impairment requiring meeting materials to be produced in another format (Braille, audio-tape, etc.) ****************************************************************************** Action 7:45p.m. 10. CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the consent calendar will be considered in toto by one action of the Council unless any Councilmember or anyone else interested in any matter on the consent calendar has a question about same. A. Acknowledging City Manager/Clerk's report on posting of the meeting's agenda Rohnert Park City Council Agenda (3) December 14, 1999 B. Accepting Cash/Investments Reports for Months Ending August 31, 1999 and September 30,1999 concurrently for: • City of Rohnert Park/City Council • Community Development Commission • Rohnert Park Financing Authority C. Resolutions for Adoption: 99-251 Recognizing Lieutenant Nicole Aunapu, U.S.M.C., for Her Diverse and Extra-ordinary achievements 99-252 Award of Contract for Tree Maintenance and Pruning 99-253 Authorizing and Approving Agreement with University of San Francisco for MMCR Trainees Program for Providing Services to Youth and Family Services 99-254 Authorizing the City Manager to File Applications for Federal Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Funding for Overlays - 2000 and Committing the Necessary Local matching Funds 99-255 Endorsing Rohnert Park Boys & Girls Club Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application 99-256 Authorizing and Approving Expenditure for Certain Renovations of City's PAL Building Action************************************************************************* 7:50 p.m. 11. Planning and Zoning matter: • File No. 1865 - Five Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge -. Proposed project consists of a 6 foot wide bridge spanning Five Creek for a distance of approximately 100 feet to provide pedestrian and bicycle access between the "F" and "H" neighborhoods of the City, located at the east end of Fauna Avenue and the west end of Holly Avenue. 1) Staff report 2) PUBLIC HEARING 3) Council discussion/action • Resolution for consideration: 99-_ Calling for Sealed Proposals for Five Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge, Project No. 1989-20 Action 8:00 p.m. 12. Taxi Cab Service Application for Certificate of Public Convenience & Necessity ., 1) Staff report 2) PUBLIC HEARING 3) Council discussion/action Action 8:05 p.m.. 13. Presentation by Director of Public Safety • Y2K - Emergency Preparedness, Dec. 30 - Jan. 2, 2000 - Staffing & Costs • Council discussion/direction 8:10 p.m. 14. Recreational Vehicle Parking 1) City Attorney review of existing ordinance 2) Dept. of Public Safety report on enforcement strategy Rohnert Park City Council Agenda (4) December 14, 1999 GENERAL PLAN WORK SESSION Action 8:20 p.m. 15. Council Year 2000 Project—Matters related to the General Plan process, if any Procedure instituted by City Council-Any Councilmember may agendize items for action &/or discussion by generic title related to this project 1) General Plan Oversight Committee update (VVM/JM) 2eview of formats & timelines for March 7, 2000 UGB Measure •Last day to amend/withdraw measure, December 15, 1999 'Primary Argument deadline, December 20, 1999 •Rebuttal deadline (only if opposing arguments are filed, December 30, 1999 •Impartial/Fiscal Analysis due, December 31, 999 3) Consideration of Amended Language Submitting Urban Growth Boundary Measure i4) Staff/City Attorney report b) Council discussion/action 'Resolution for consideration ✓99-_ Amending the Text of UGB Question Presented in Resolution No. 99-249 Calling a Special Municipal Election, to be Held with the Consolidated Primary Election on March 7, 2000, to Submit to the Voters of the City an Ordinance making Amendments to the General Plan of the City of Rohnert Park Including Establishing a 20 Year Urban Growth Boundary 4) General Plan Review by City Council to identify, discuss and possibly change / item in General Plan (input from City Council and Planning Commission) �) Budget Augmentation 'Council discussion/approval 6) Other General Plan matters, if any Action 9:50 p.m. 16. Rohnert Park Housing Financing Authority matter: • Ratification of Resident Election approving the appointment of Patrick Reymond as Resident Representative for the Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park on the Housing Financing Authority Board Action 9:55 p.m. 17. Proposition 22 (Knight Initiative) March, 2000 General Election Ballot 14) City Attorney review 2) Maddy Hirshfield of"No on Knight-Proposition 22" letter requesting endorsement • Council discussion/direction CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION TO EXTEND MEETING PAST 10:00 P 11/Ag 10:00 p.m. 18. Council Committee &/or Other Reports: 1)Vthildren and Families First (Prop.10) Commission - Parents Speak Out mtg. (VVM) 2) Other, if any Rohnert Park City Council Agenda (5) December 14, 1999 10:05 p.m. 19..'Communications 10:10 p.m. 20. Matters from/for Council: 1) Consideration to cancel December 28th Council meeting due to holidays 2) Miscellaneous, if any 10:15 p.m. 21. City Manager's report: vr) Pedestrian Time in Crosswalks 40) Joint Meeting with SSU Executive Staff .3) Refuse Collection Rate Increase - Public Hearing, Jan. 25, 2000 ,l) Proposed Golf course Rate Increase (CPI) 5) Miscellaneous, if any 10:25 p.m. 22. City Attorney's report: 1) Any items from closed session 2) Other, if any Action 10:30 p.m. 23. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION matters: Burbank Housing Development Corporation letter request for reimbursement of costs for predevelopment work on scattered site proposal a) Staff report b) Commission discussion/direction 2) Other, if any Other unscheduled public appearances (limited to 5 minutes per appearance with an unrestricted total time limit) Adjournment no later than 10:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Thursday, December 16, 1999, at City Council Chambers, 6750 Commerce Blvd., Rohnert Park, Ca. for Mayor/Vice Mayor Rotation Ceremonial Meeting JH-h:agenda\121499ag * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * % * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTICE OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR HOLDING A CLOSED MEETING of the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF ROHNERT PARK December 14, 1999 LOCATION: City Manager's Office at City Hall, 6750 Commerce Blvd., Rohnert Park, Ca. TIME: 6:00 p.m. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54950 et.seq., the City Council will hold a closed session. More specific information regarding this meeting is provided as follows: •Personnel matters (G.C. 54957) Include names/titles of City staff&/or consultants in attendance 1. Labor Negotiations - Rohnert Park Peace Officers Assn. (RPPOA) & Dispatchers Update 2. Director of Public Safety Recruitment - Update 3. Housing Specialist Position - Recruitment 4. City Employee Vehicle Usage (JR) 5. City Manager's Annual Evaluation City Ma ager/City Clerk Attachment to: City of Rohnert Park City Council Agenda Dec. 14, 1999 JH-h:agida1121499ag Rolm rt Park, CA 94928--2486 a' Rohnert Park, CA 94928--2486 ?7 Linda Lamb 04S-ceuAt-ce ao''-to 33a Mai colm Jacobson (Ta.,rz. `49 5734 Dexter Circle 150 Walnut Circle Rohnert Park, cA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Grc01 ROIINFRT PARK CITY HALL CITY HALL 6750 Commerce Blvd. 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park, CA 94928--2486 Rohnert Park, CA 94928--2486 t44 4 ) Bill Odell Paula Young Odell Printing 6086 So. Diane Court 5460 State Farm Drive Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 ROHNERT 49cfrc0 PARK ?/75 "P`t CITY HALL CITY HALL 6750 Commerce Blvd. 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park, CA 94928--2486 Rohnert Park, CA 94928--2486 Herb Cody 5o.00 . ht ""� Mike Jones Sonoma County Martial Arts Yardbiom 5675 Redwood Drive 5300 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 co' city a 6,i S/ /,/� I7 . ROHNERT PARK 10 _ � CITY HALL CITY HALL 6750 Commerce Blvd. 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park, CA 94928--2486 Rohnert Park, CA 94928--2486 Howard Sowers ( s o - , c/o Grossi Farms 6652 Petaluma Hill Road Jud Snyder Penngrove, CA Community Voice 101 Golf Course Drive Rohnert Park, CA 94928 ¶ • ' ; • MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK November 23, 1999 The Members of the Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park met this date during the City Council meeting at approximately 9:40 p.m. in the City Offices, 6750 Commerce Boulevard, with Chairperson Reilly presiding. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Reilly called the Community Development • Commission to order at approximately 9:40 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: (5) Commission Members Flores, Mackenzie, Vidak-Martinez, Spiro and Chairperson Reilly 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Upon motion by Commission Member Vidak- Martinez, seconded by Commission Member Mackenzie, the minutes of the October 26, 1999 meeting were unanimously approved by a 5-0 vote. 3. APPROVAL OF B ILLS/DEMANDS FOR PAYMENT Upon motion by Commission Member Vidak-Martinez, seconded by Commission Member Mackenzie, bills in the amount of$50,859.00 were unanimously approved. 4. ACCEPTANCE OF CASH/INVESTMENTS REPORTS: • Fiscal Year End June 30, 1999-Final Report • Month End, July 31, 1999 Upon motion by Commission Member Flores, seconded by Commission Member Spiro, cash investment reports for Fiscal year End June 30, 1999-Final Report, and for the Month End, July 31, 1999 were unanimously approved. 5. ACKNOWLEDGING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY'S REPORT: The Executive Director/Secretary's report on posting of the agenda was acknowledged. 6. UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES: Chairperson Reilly stated that in compliance with State Law(the Brown Act), citizens wishing to make a comment may do so at this time. No one wished to speak. Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park Minutes (2) November 23, 1999 7. RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTION: Resolution Nos. 99-15 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO FILE WAIVERS OF FIRE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT REFUNDS FOR COMMISSION OWNED PROPERTIES Mayor Reilly read resolution title. City Manager Netter summarized the contents of the staff report on this item. Upon motion by Spiro, seconded by Flores, reading was waived and Resolution No. 99-15 was unanimously adopted, by a 5-0 vote. 99-16 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO CAST BALLOTS IN BEHALF OF ALL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, VOTING YES TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED FIRE SUPPRESSION BENEFIT ASSESSMENT RATE Chairperson Reilly read resolution title. City Manager Netter summarized the staff report on this item. Upon motion by Commission Member Mackenzie, seconded by Vice-Chairperson Vidak-Martinez, reading was waived, and Resolution No. 99-16 was unanimously adopted, by a 5-0 vote. 8. TAX ALLOCATION BONDS AND CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION PROJECT PRIORITIES 1) Review of Work Session Chairperson Reilly reported that Council looked at various projects and discussed various bonds. He noted that the Library construction was given the go-ahead, but that the City Hall was postponed, although supported by the majority of the Council. Chairperson Reilly stated that a lot of emphasis was on economic development projects, and that there are a lot of questions on what funds are available. Chairperson Reilly stated that staff would provide an update on the available funds by the end of January. Councilmember Mackenzie noted that a straw vote was taken on Staff proposals to develop an Economic Plan (copy attached to original set of minutes). Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park Minutes (3) November 23, 1999 Chairperson noted that the Council authorized staff to proceed with the development of an Economic Development Work Plan and come back before the Council on 2/8/2000. 9. MISCELLANEOUS STAFF REPORTS: There were none. 10. MATTERS FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS: There were none. 11. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, Chairperson Reilly adjourned the meeting at approximately 9:45 p.m. Teresa Taylor-King, Recorder James J. Reilly, Jr., Chairperson 112399cdcmn 1 Rohnert Park Financing Authority Minutes November 23, 1999 Members of the Rohnert Park Financing Authority of the City of Rohnert Park met this date immediately following the City Council meeting at approximately 10:55 p.m. in the City Offices, 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, with Chairperson James J. Reilly, presiding. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Reilly called the meeting to order at approximately 10:55 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present (5) Agency Members Flores, Mackenzie, Vidak-Martinez, Spiro and Chairperson Reilly Absent: (0) None Staff present for all or part of the meeting: Executive Director Netter, City Attorney Strauss and Assistant City Manager Leivo. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES-JULY 27, 1999 Upon motion by Agency Member Flores, seconded by Agency Member Mackenzie,the minutes of July 27, 1999 were unanimously approved as submitted. 3. ACCEPTANCE OF ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY CASH REPORTS: • Fiscal Year End,June 30, 1999 - Final Report • Month End,July 31, 1999 Agency Members concurred acceptance of the cash reports, with Agency Member Vidak-Martinez abstaining due to her absence from the last meeting. 4. ACKNOWLEDGING THE SECRETARY'S REPORT ON THE POSTING OF THE AGENDA Executive Director Netter acknowledged the posting of the meeting's agenda. 5. UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES: Chairperson Reilly stated that in compliance with State law(The Brown Act), citizens wishing to make comments may do so at this time. No one responded. 6. MISCELLANEOUS: None 7. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, Chairperson Reilly adjourned the meeting at approximately 11:00 p.m. Teresa Taylor-King, Recorder James J. Reilly, Jr., Chairperson 112399RPFAmn CITY OF ROHNERT PARK BILLS FOR APPROVAL V C c . December 14, 1999 7 G Hand Check Numbers 100465 Through 100471 $ 100,469.13 and Check Numbers 100603 Through 100611 Dated November 9, 1999 Through November 18, 1999 Computer Check Numbers 100612 Through 100819 1,041,756.05 Dated November 19, 1999 Hand Check Numbers 100820 126.00 Dated November 19, 1999 Computer Check Numbers 100824 Through 100897 131,614.75 Dated November 24, 1999 Dental Check Numbers 100913 Through 100958 11,555.40 Dated November 29, 1999 Hand Check Numbers 100821 Through 100823 76,196.21 and Check Numbers 100898 Through 100912 Dated November 23, 1999 Through November 24, 1999 Hand Check Numbers 100959 Through 100960 1,486.27 Dated December 1, 1999 Computer Check Numbers 100961 Through 101163 234,378.02 Dated December 3, 1999 SUB-TOTAL $ 1,597,581.83 ADDITIONAL BILLS FOR APPROVAL: Avila Enterprises Project No. 1998-4 Teen Center Building $ 8,385.00 Baechtel Hudis Inc. Project No. 1991-4 Rohnert Park Expressway Interchange 390.00 Benco Contracting&Engineering, Inc. Project No. 1991-4 Rohnert Park Expressway Interchange 181,016.93 Brelje&Race Project No. 1998-3 Water Storage Tanks- 1998 8,487.00 Fisher Friedman Associates Project No. 1999-3 City Hall 1,601.29 Ghilotti Bros.Construction,Inc. 52,283.24 Project No. 1998-6 Overlays- 1998 Ghilotti Construction Co. 33,060.67 Project No. 1994-7 Snyder Lane Bike Path Mid Valley Title&Escrow Co. Project No. 1991-4 Rohnert Park Expressway Interchange 9,527.21 Noll&Tam 7,231.18 Project No. 1999-4 Library Piazza Construction Project No. 1998-3 Water Storage Tanks- 1998 168,511.49 Project No. 1998-10 Public Safety Emergency Driveway 27,186.57 Vali Cooper&Associates Project No. 1991-4 Rohnert Park Expressway Interchange 18,520.71 SUB-TOTAL $ 516,201.29 TOTAL $ 2,113,783.12 l ; CITY OF ROHNERT PARK r BILLS FOR APPROVAL December 14, 1999, 1999 Hand Cheek Numbers 100465-100471; 100603-11 Dated November 9-18, 1999 $100,469.13 Computer Check Numbers 100612-100819 Dated November 19, 1999 $1,041,756.05 Hand Check Number 100820 Dated November 19, 1999 $126.00 Computer Check Numbers 100824-100897 Dated November 24, 1999 $131,614.75 Dental Check Numbers 100913-100958 Dated November 29, 1999 $11,555.40 Hand Check Numbers 100821-100823; 100898-912 Dated November 23 & 24, 1999 $76,196.21 Hand Check Numbers 100959 & 100960 Dated December 1, 1999 $1,486.27 Computer Check Numbers 100961-101163 Dated December 3, 1999 $234,378.02 TOTAL $1,597,581.83 .,,ID VA�UE S3FA3401 . 0.9. :_23. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DEMAND_ LI S.T DEMAND DATE 11/1�/1��� CHECV.: # VENDOR #/NAME CHECK TOTAL 00465 _0_04_6JL 00467 00468 _0_0469 00470 00471 Q0_6Jl3 00604 00605 00607 00608 00609 .0_06-10 00611 00616 0_061 J_ 00618 00619 J)_O��O 00621 00622 00623 00624 00625 006_2_6 00627 00628 00629 00630 00631 00632 00633 00634 00635 00636 00637 00638 00639 00640 _Q_0�41 00642 00643 _ ()0_6_4�. 00645 00646 00647 00648 00649 J) Q_(;_;i_9 10414 J 0.4.1-3_ 00323 00364 0.0324 00363 09254 0.259J __ 06592 00081 00_325. 00325 07414 1.0.25.4_ 05622 00245 02747 09568 07242 0j)680 10317 08769 00016 1 I 307 07847 ___ Q99Qj_. 07S01 08846 00551 09834 09379 05622 00029 11.267 09991 00695 01706 U _ _1_ S._=l -04916 05612 06?!:?.0 1 1 311 10269 10309 -------02364 02513 08831 09731 00084 04Q0_-;3_ WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK _\JA.S_HJ NGT.Ot-1 M_UJ_U_AL. _BAN� UNITED WAY SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTL. UNION REDW.O.OD CREDIT U_N_I_ON ROHNERT PARK PEACE OFFICERS CITY OF *ROHNERT PARK _Cit El!leLO.YMENT _D_EVELOPMENL DE:PJ ACTOR'S EQUITY ASSOCIATION CITY OF *SANTA ROSA KAISER FOUNDATIQN KAISER FOUNDATION CA TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL WENDY *MC GLOTHL[N WISELY_ MARLENE *AUSTIN 101 INTERNATIONAL, INC. ACTION PLU�BING _&_H�ATJNG_MNT LAURAL. *ADAMS, DVM AM PRINTING COMPANY PENNJS *�MANTITE AMATURO GROUP AMERICAN LINEN AMERICA� WAT�R WORKS A�$�. ANDERSON'S ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND __ Af_P..hlEP_ CQNC�-�T-�. ARDEN INDUSTRIES ASILOMAR CONFERENCE CENTER AS�Q OF BAY ARE;A G9V _ERNMJ::t-{TS AT&T EASYLINK SERVICES AT&T LANGUAGE LINE L.LC MAR�_E,NE *�U?T_I _ _N_ AUTOMATIC RAIN/ HORIZON BARCO PRODUCTS COMPAYN _ BAIHU_I:'. _ *BA_l�RO'-' BB&T, INC.BECKLEY-CARDY COMPANY f!E_NGQ __ CONIR�CT_IN� A_flll;) �NG�_ INC CANDACE it.BIRCHFIELD BNI BOOKS DI_�N_P. •B9NNIC! _ BRADMARK TECHNOLOGIES INC COREY •BUSCH THE *BUTLER COMPANY--. -·-----------BUTLER'S UNIFORMS CA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT CA FIRE ACADEMY ---- -------CA FIREFIGHTERS ASSO, STAT� CA GENERAL SERVICES DEPT CAL TEST _ _BN�l,.._YTI<;:_A._l:. LAJ;:l9_RATORY 4,177.36 _ .. 2 I 582. 4f:_, 233.25 641 .76 :l0,481.81 3,955.00 480.00 2e_,_a.1 9_. as _16.30 9,537.99 �o / 760 ._Q2 3,444.03 7.50 SJ> Q_, o o 832.40 630.76 6,772. 8_3 1,168.00 394.53 t�6.88 1,530.00 587.29 �S.00 635.69 23.31 ;J.4��-�o 60.39 100.00 177.00 3.96 46.00 1 , 6_6:4_._:4._o 105.83 1,327.96 50.00 800.83 141.90 _ 230, 92-4. 42 840.00 201.64 200.00 1,290.00 150.00 91 . 59 627.26 1,641.00 158.00 700.00 1,104.00 774.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF ROHNERT PARK BILLS FOR APPROVAL December 14, 1999 Hand Checks #2554-2555 Dated November 3-24, 1999 $39,343.57 TOTAL $39,373.57 ID VALUE S3FA3401 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK E 09 : 07 DEMAND LIST DEMAND DATE 11 /29/1999 CHECK # VENDOR #/NAME CHECK TOTAL 02554 06311 CHRISTMAS IN APRIL USA 48 . 00 02555 00563 RALEY ' S SUPERMARKET 70 . 92 02556 11338 NOLL & lAN 25, 438 . 06 02557 03102 MARY ' S PIZZA SHACK 106 . 59 02558 07353 PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICE CNIR . 3, 680 . 00 02559 02824 NORTH BAY TITLE COMPANY 10 , 000 . 00 Total Demand : 39 , 343 . 57 -<ft,„,,a i2l,Y/99 e.,_-. e..„..._._ 14,5- L- : Youth of the Year Report- December 14 Representatives: Melissa Canning Jackie Snyder Daniel Cronin December 1-15: Canned Food Drive. Tomorrgw is the last day for students to bring cans in. ASB will be collecting the last round of cans from classrooms during 4th period, and tallying the points to determine the winner. So far the contest is between Mr. Ken Tone and Mrs. Dawn Mawhinney, who have been saving all of their cans through the �, "collecting-rounds" until tomorrow. The ASB room is full of barrels and boxes of cans, ���\y all of which have been collected during the 2 week duration. December 15: Minimum Day. There will be a faculty meeting held after school gets out to determine what type of scheduling should be used next year. There are 3 or 4 different options for the teachers to vote from. December 13-17: Spirit Week. There are different days this week for the students to show their spirit. In having spirit week, it is hopeful that students will get excited for winter break, and for the rally which is on friday. December 17: Winter Dance. It has been in the bulletin for the past couple weeks, so we are hoping for a successful outcome. Dajuri, December 20-January 3: Winter Break January 18-20: Finals week. Many teachers have already began the preperation for their classes' finals, while students are beginning to stress over them. ikevn uidev Ls weet4viu., cam' `Ntle I2-ohn eve- Pcuidc. Swl wl buk) is h.c 'a& Son CoY Q,KaN L671Sh.t,pS al Sot,t ,L) isa. ja-nlOY Cat..-e . -n,S 6 (01/WS 't f i-hods smm. rr 6� -l -v,mt 20�'" w��c ii -�eMuxxs '�,/Iu},, • + \ SW M Oates S ))*ki 05A"1/4•0 Oft(i WOS kikA-01,\ . ) • . C pu.ha ,ryufv9,9.0(s cure voeto me lb w�-ta, hioi c u ex sW UTLQ,1"5. \Ak atsa lug lb sus OV-V VW-C1 +s'• . had su o t a gut ao A -P& k 1 ry uc h mcye pnta- wo u2d mat@ w (49 Christmas in April * Rohnert Park Good evening, ladies and gentlemen of the Council. I am Joe Perry, President of the Board of Directors for the recently organized Christmas in April * Rohnert Park program. As you know, Christmas in April * Rohnert Park is a non-profit, non-denominational organization that works with the community to rehabilitate the houses of low-income homeowners, particularly the elderly and disabled, so that they can continue to live in warmth, safety and independence. The Rebuild Day in Rohnert Park will take place on April 15th 2000. Christmas in April * Rohnert Park relies on community donations of time, money, and materials. ✓ The Board of Directors has been meeting each Monday evening at 6:30 PM since November 8t. ✓ We have completed and approved the by-laws, articles of incorporation and application for 501(c)(3) IRS non-profit status. ✓ A"living timetable" has been developed and approved, the timetable outlines critical timing and the order of work. ✓ A proposed three-year budget has been approved by the Board. ✓ In addition to donations, fund raising ideas are being explored. Some of the ideas include co-participation in an established golf tournament; a 50`s/60's dance combined with a spaghetti feed and silent auction, our goal is to raise over $10,000.00, in the next 6 months. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the City Council and the City of Rohnert Park for your support of this worthwhile project, and to wish you a Happy Holiday. On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to invite each and every one of you to participate in the rehabilitation of the selected homes. For additional information contact Marlyn Keller at 588-2233 or Joe Perry at 584-4146. Again thank you for your support! INTRACOMPANY MEMORANDUM DATE: November 23, 1999 TO: Joseph D. Netter, City Manager FROM: Marlyn Keller,Housing& Rent Con rol SUBJECT: Scheduled Public Appearance Dec. 14, 1999 City Council Meeting Council: 1. 1t *7 Miscellaneain. Co Ag:dam=11 X lzaiVi`it'S ' Speaker: Joe Perry, President-elect of Copy to: r , 8175 Davis Lane cojy to: — Penngrove, CA 94951 Phone: (707) 795-1520 • Topic: As the elected President of the recently organized Christmas in April * Rohnert Park, Mr. Perry would like to present a progress report of activities to the City Council and thank them for their support. He will be happy to answer any question they may have regarding the organization's plans for the upcoming April event. SONOMA COUNTY MARTIAL ARTS CENTERS Council: , X Date By � c Miscellaneous Date: December 5, 1999 �`0 `�EO� Communications j 1241ctr, Agenda 4,71h47 05, y ai s` f(3 Copy to: T Copy to: To: Mayor Reilly, City Councilmembers, City Staff Re: Library Donation For: Presentation December 14, 1999 Dear Mayor Reilly, On behalf of Sonoma County Martial Arts Centers, I would like to present a check for $500 to purchase a globe for the children's section of our new library. It is a pleasure to make this donation supporting a much needed new library for our community. Best Regards, Herb Cody, Director of Sonoma County Martial Arts Commit , X Dale :BY Mieoefleneous Cobs • Agenda 12hq 199 >C 12Mq93 Copy to: STEERING COMMITTEE FOR A NEW LIBRARY copy to: 5732 Dexter Cir-Rohnert Park, CA 94928 November 28, 1999 James Reilly, Mayor Dear Mayor Reilly, As a follow up to the phone message I sent to you last week, I wanted to discuss the possibility of recognizing the businesses who helped make the the library project float (for Founder's Day) so successful. John DellOsso and I made a presentation at a recent Cotati Chamber of Commerce meeting to lend support to the library project. We thanked the Cotati Businesses for supporting the Float/Library project. The Cotati Mayor(Mr. Berkemeir) decided to publicly recognize the businesses at the next Cotati Council Meeting to help support the library project. I realized that we may have been remiss to not have suggested this to you as well for our Rohnert Park businesses. At our library steering committee meeting this past week, it was recommended that I contact you with the names of these businesses, and (briefly) how they helped. The six businesses are: Odell Printing, Jim Stauft(2000 brochures), Yardbirds, Mike Jones( building materials for the float), The Community Voice, Mr. Snyder(publicity), Grossi Farms, Ed Grossi (Hot Air Balloon), Brownie Troop 338, Linda Lamb(float munchkins), Rohnert Park-Cotati Friends Of The Library, Paula Young(fund-raising/booth staff). Thank you for considering this matter,and for your continued support of this important community project. Sincerely, L. Conde' VED 0 2 911* !.`L. A.... Y' •'•k'! 'Y'}',' ''v, ','{'; .',}'{ .•,#'r! ':i :Y'' 'Y.k'f ",..; r'...4,'A' ,'.#':.: r.t'..: '.#': ,'.# i , i1 I I I. I.' '•1 I ��Y • •Ilk 4- '1(0 i 49 w a I ` ' 1 ‘ P4 ›.- .,. i ... . ge • 44/ ilik, \ 0.." Ilk 4 .14 ct .0:4) 0 4- r• ralCLI o v e '� q l ` ,I I.68.:, W - 1 imi Z:3 1...e.).") 0 i •,.., ♦'`• \ O !• ti, 161110) a o �&) I: ::I ♦raj• N .:..• ••; � ›o› 0•4105 L ftp) CL 1 ..1 I 144 \O ,.....,..y.......:: . . . I . • is.,‘‘.0 I. � ,1 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM tvt.4„1--- To: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Michael L. Harrow City Manager Netter City Engineer Gaffney Finance Director City Attorney Flitner Assistant City Manager Leivo Accountant/Auditor Raymond Accounting Supervisor Lipitz Management Analyst Fogle Date: November 10, 1999 CASH BALANCES AS OF AUGUST 31, 1999 General Fund ($1,806,556.37) Payroll Account 0.00 Traffic Safety Fund 28,057.67 Motor Vehicle License Fees 341,048.47 R.E.M.I.F. (40,906.94) ($1,478,357.17) Special Water Connection Fee Fund 959,374.42 Per Acre For Development Fee Fund 1,895,886.01 Water/Wastewater Fee Fund(Dev. Imp. Fund) 12,898.44 Sewer Service Connection Fee Fund 6,214,835.38 Water/Wastewater Fee Fund(Spec. Sewer Conn. Fund) 12,898.44 Water Utility Fund 2,284,133.98 Sewer Utility Fund 1,919,017.19 Garbage Utility Fund 65,478.85 Garbage Utility Fund-Commercial Set-aside Fund 428,255.81 General Fund-Refundable Deposits 124,010.75 Utility Fund-Refundable Deposits 88,747.76 Improvement Project Fund 1,909,984.53 Gas Tax Fund: Sec. 2107 Maint./Const. $408,321.06 Sec. 2107.5 Engineering 6,000.00 Sec. 2106 Const./Maint. 1,071,634.57 Sec. 2105 289,693.43 SB 140 28,607.83 1,804,256.89 Transportation Development Act(TDA) Fund 4,000.00 Capital Outlay Fund 654,817.40 I.S.T.E.A. Fund 0.00 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Fund 21,910.81 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLESF) Fund 87,473.92 Fire Benefit Assessment(Measure M) Fund 29,140.82 Annexation Fees Fund 49,840.00 Rent Appeals Board Fund 60,160.63 Copeland Creek Drainage Facilities Fund 59,306.40 Debt Service Fund 0.00 Traffic Signals Fund 1,125,349.32 Vehicle Abatement Fund 37,000.00 Performing Arts Center Endowment Fund 1,617,396.00 Dental Self-Insurance Fund 3,956.75 Petty Cash 3,500.00 General Fund Reserve 1,916,865.00 Reserve For Self-Insured Losses 1,779,107.00 Reserve For Retired Employee Medical 895,500.00 Reserve For Infrastructure Maintenance 568,472.00 Reserve For P.E.R.S. Costs-Public Safety Employees 148,384.94 Reserve For P.E.R.S. Costs-Miscellaneous Employees 446,070.25 Reserve for Dev. of Add] Rec. Facilities 331,257.00 Cash With Leasing Company/Municipal Leasing 241,468.94 Miscellaneous Reserve(CDA Loan Principal Repayment) 203,495.11 Reserve For Housing Programs 506,904.00 Reserve For Active Employee Medical 306,733.00 Sub-Total Operating Cash 27,339,530.57 Special Enforcement Unit-South 23,041.68 Cash with Fiscal Agent (Earned Interest Fund) 27,118.70 Cash with Fiscal Agent (Refunding Dist 1983-10A) 0.00 Cash with Fiscal Agent (1993 Consolidated Refunding District) 499,860.04 Sub-Total City Cash 27,889,550.99 Employee Deferred Compensation(City is Trustee): Deferred Compensation- Washington Mutual 457 Plan 2,000,976.03 Deferred Compensation- ICMA 401(a) Plan 1,636,884.38 Deferred Compensation- ICMA 457 Plan-Full Time Employees 7,770,434.40 Deferred Compensation- Washington Mutual-Part Time Employees Plan 158,966.81 Total Employee Deferred Compensation 11,567,261.62 TOTAL CASH $39,456,812.61 CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Petty Cash $3,500.00 Payroll Checking Account-Exchange Bank 0.00 General Checking Account-Exchange Bank 0.750% (696,875.88) Utility Checking Account-Exchange Bank © 0.750% 2,245.27 Recreation Checking Account-Exchange Bank © 0.750% 7,481.44 Subtotal of Petty Cash and Checking Accounts (683,649.17) Investment Accounts-See Schedule of Investments Attached 28,304,612.52 Cash With Leasing Company/Municipal Leasing: Fidelity Investments c 5.040% 241,468.94 Cash With Fiscal Agent (Earned Interest Fund) c 5.513% 27,118.70 Subtotal of Cash With Fiscal Agent 268,587.64 Employee Deferred Compensation(CitY is Trustee): Deferred Compensation-Washington Mutual 457 Plan 2,000,976.03 Deferred Compensation-ICMA 401(a) Plan 1,636,884.38 Deferred Compensation-ICMA 457 Plan-Full Time Employees 7,770,434.40 Deferred Compensation-Washington Mutual-Part-Time Employees Plan 158,966.81 Total Employee Deferred Compensation 11,567,261.62 Total Cash Distribution $39,456,812.61 Investment Yield for AUGUST 1999 5.734% INVESTMENT POLICY&SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution#99-60, adopted March 23, 1999. The City currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six months. • CITY OF ROHNERT PARK-SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS-AUGUST 31, 1999 Source of Investment Maturity Interest Par Value of Curr. Mkt.Val. Investment Investment Institution Type Date Rate Investment Of Investment Valuation Exchange Bank Savings Passbook Svgs N/A @ 2.000% $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Note (1) Georgetown Bank&Trust Cert.of Deposit 09/13/99 @ 6.276% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Pullman Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 09/16/99 © 5.860% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Farmers & Merchants Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/17/99 @ 6.260% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Merit Bank(Svgs Bk Kent) Cert.of Deposit 09/17/99 @ 6.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Commercial Pacific Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/20/99 @ 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Natl. Bank of Manitowoc Cert.of Deposit 09/22/99 @ 6.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Bank of Beverly Hills Cert.of Deposit 10/18/99 @ 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Capital Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/24/99 © 5.920% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Capital Bank Cert.of Deposit 11/03/99 @ 6.210% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Natl. Bank in Brookings Cert.of Deposit 11/15/99 © 5.951% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Advanta Financial Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/02/99 © 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Hamilton Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/21/99 © 5.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Eaton Federal Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/27/99 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Advanta National Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/26/00 @ 6.400% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) MBNA America Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/28/00 @ 6.350% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Deposit National Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/28/00 @ 6.300% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Providian National Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/28/00 @ 6.300% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Bank of Mt. Vernon Cert.of Deposit 03/06/00 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank N.D. Cert.of Deposit 03/06/00 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Ocwen Federal Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/06/00 @ 6.450% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Insouth Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/20/00 @ 6.450% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Merrick Bank Corporation Cert.of Deposit 03/20/00 © 5.710% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Atlantic Bank&Trust Cert.of Deposit 03/27/00 @ 6.050% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Atlantic Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/03/00 @ 6.050% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Central Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/10/00 © 6.660% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) International Bank of Miami Cert.of Deposit 04/26/00 © 5.300% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) National Republic Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/30/00 © 6.910% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) United Credit National Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/01/00 © 5.600% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) lntercredit Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/12/00 @ 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Southern Pacific Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/12/00 © 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) CreditAmerica Savings Cert.of Deposit 06/17/00 @ 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Upstate National Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/25/00 @ 5.970% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Nevada Cert.of Deposit 06/29/00 @ 6.010% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Gulf Coast Bank&Trust Cert.of Deposit 07/17/00 @ 6.290% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Citizens Fed. Svgs. Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/28/00 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Franklin Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/28/00 @ 5.950% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Approved Federal Svgs. & Loan Cert.of Deposit 09/01/00 © 5.901% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Crescent Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/26/00 @ 6.420% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Metropolitan Bank&Trust Cert.of Deposit 09/28/00 @ 5.901% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Michigan Heritage Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/08/00 @ 6.410% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Argo Federal Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/21/00 @ 5.370% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Superior Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/13/01 © 5.370% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First State Bank of Colorado Cert.of Deposit 01/27/01 @ 5.400% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Jefferson Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 02/05/01 @ 6.160% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Premier Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/11/01 © 6.150% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Redwood Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/11/01 © 6.100% 500,000.00 500,000.00 Note (1) Family Federal Savings Cert.of Deposit 03/12/01 @ 6.630% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Mid America Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/06/01 © 5.810% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Family Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/14/01 @ 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Liberty Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/15/01 @ 5.460% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Farmers Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/28/01 © 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Eaton Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/28/01 @ 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cole Taylor Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/06/01 @ 5.520% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Golden Security Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/11/01 © 6.100% 90,000.00 90,000.00 Note (1) Provident Bank of Maryland Cert.of Deposit 05/13/01 @ 5.510% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Citizens State Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 @ 6.140% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Financial Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 © 6.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Chevy Chase Fed. Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 @ 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Mountain West Bank of Helena Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 © 5.507% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Saratoga National Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/04/01 @ 6.200% 300,000.00 300,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Michigan Cert.of Deposit 06/12/01 @ 6.200% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) NAB Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/12/01 @ 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Valencia National Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/24/01 @ 5.350% 300,000.00 300,000.00 Note (1) First Bank of Brunswick Cert.of Deposit 07/31/01 @ 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Amcore Bank N.A. Cert.of Deposit 08/04/01 @ 6.210% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Enterprise Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/05/01 © 6.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First America Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 08/06/01 @ 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cornbelt Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 08/06/01 @ 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Milwaukee Western Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/10/01 @ 6.400% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Bay Financial Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/13/01 @ 6.070% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Community First Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/13/01 © 6.050% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) American Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/01/01 @ 5.900% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Associates National Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/17/01 © 5.750% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Treasury Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/18/01 @ 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Citizens Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/21/01 @ 5.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Parkvale Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/16/01 © 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Feliciana Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/23/01 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Republic Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/26/01 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) State Bank&Trust Cert.of Deposit 10/30/01 @ 5.450% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Advanta National Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/13/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Greene County Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/01/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Capital One Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/02/02 @ 5.540% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) M&T Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/03/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Great Southern Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/16/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Commerce National Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/17/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FNB Southwest Cert.of Deposit 03/26/02 @ 5.560% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Oakwood Deposit Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/08/02 @ 5.600% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Bank of Arkansas Cert.of Deposit 04/26/02 @ 5.500% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Landmark Community Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/21/02 @ 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) BankFirst N.A. Cert.of Deposit 06/15/02 @ 6.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Houston Community Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/14/02 @ 6.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cross Country Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/25/02 @ 6.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Natl. Bk. of the Rockies Cert.of Deposit 08/08/02 @ 6.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Union Bank of the West Cert.of Deposit 09/04/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 09/09/02 @ 5.715% 500,000.00 489,530.00 Note (2) Provident Bank of Ohio Cert.of Deposit 12/18/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Pendleton Federal Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/11/03 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. Cert.of Deposit 02/09/03 @ 5.500% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) East Stroudsburg Savings Cert.of Deposit 02/25/03 @ 5.550% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 04/07/03 @ 6.000% 1,000,000.00 979,690.00 Note (2) Commerce National Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/14/03 @ 5.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) International Finance Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/21/03 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) San Jose National Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/04/03 @ 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) National Penn Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/21/03 @ 5.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Capital One Federal Svgs Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/19/03 @ 6.250% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Shelby County Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/28/03 @ 6.320% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Nations Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/03/03 @ 5.500% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Credicard National Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/19/03 @ 6.300% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 10/29/03 @ 6.020% 1,000,000.00 974,380.00 Note (2) Keybank USA Cert.of Deposit 11/05/03 @ 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 11/18/03 @ 6.000% 500,000.00 486,720.00 Note (2) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 01/05/04 @ 6.000% 1,000,000.00 972,190.00 Note (2) Alfalfa County Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/11/04 @ 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 01/20/04 @ 6.060% 500,000.00 486,720.00 Note (2) Heritage Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/26/04 @ 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Klamath First Federal S&L Cert.of Deposit 02/16/04 @ 5.540% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FNMA Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 02/19/04 @ 6.000% 500,000.00 483,405.00 Note (1) The Bank of Sharon Cert.of Deposit 02/26/04 @ 5.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Hartford Carlisle Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/03/04 @ 5.750% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Pacific State Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/22/04 @ 5.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FNMA Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 04/26/04 @ 6.020% 500,000.00 483,037.50 Note (2) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 05/10/04 @ 6.135% 498,828.13 486,565.00 Note (2) First National Bank of Keystone Cert.of Deposit 05/11/04 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Med. Term Step-up Note Medium Term Note 06/01/04 @ 5.750% 500,000.00 486,700.00 Note (1) Park Avenue Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/04/04 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Marin Cert.of Deposit 06/28/04 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Chicago Cert.of Deposit 08/11/04 @ 6.750% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Med. Term Note Cert.of Deposit 08/17/04 @ 7.050% 500,000.00 497,030.00 Note (1) Bank One Cert.of Deposit 08/19/04 @ 6.620% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) State of Calif.-LAIF Pooled Investments N/A @ 5.178% 8,200,000.00 8,200,000.00 Note (3) Sonoma Co.lnvestmt. Pool Pooled Investments N/A @ 5.130% 96,92V.35 96,924.35 Note (4) Subtotal $27,804,752.48 $27,631,891.85 1983-10 Ref.Dist.Res.-So.Co. @ 5.080% 0.00 0.00 Note (5) 1993 Consol.Ref.Dist.-So.Co. @ 5.080% 499,860.04 499,860.04 Note (5) Totals $28,304,612.52 $28,131,751.89 Note (1) These are investments in Certificates of Deposit. Current Market Value and Par Value are typically equal. Note (2) Gilford Securities current market values as of August 31, 1999 are presented. Note (3) These are funds invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund, State of California. Current Market Value and Par Value are typically equal. Interest is received quarterly and the Par Value remains the same. Note (4) These are funds invested in the Sonoma County Investment Pool. Current Market Value and Par Value are typically equal. Interest is received quarterly and the Par Value remains the same. Note (5) These funds are being held by Sonoma County acting as a Fiscal Agent for the City of Rohnert Park. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Summary of Revenue & Expenditures As Of August 31, 1999 Balance @ Current Fiscal Year Balance @ Project No. and Description 30-Jun-99 Revenue Expenditures 31-Aug-99 1977-04 Transport Avenue Ext.A.D. 29,487.98 0.00 0.00 29,487.98 1978-01 SnyderLn/Hinebaugh Cr A.D. 23,319.67 0.00 0.00 23,319.67 1979-05 Classic Ct. Assess.Dist. 8,387.21 0.00 0.00 8,387.21 1979-10 Laguna Verde Assess.Dist. 11,122.68 0.00 0.00 11,122.68 1983-10 Professional Ctr Dr.A.D. 18,048.39 0.00 0.00 18,048.39 1991-04 RPX/101 0/Cross-Phase II 119,560.78 0.00 302,044.85 (182,484.07) 1993-06 Street Lighting Acquisition (375,403.00) 0.00 0.00 (375,403.00) 1994-07 Snyder Lane Bikepath (161,639.72) 0.00 284.00 (161,923.72) 1994-08 M Park-Phase II 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1995-07 Rubberized RR Crossing 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 1996-01 RPX Interchng. Improvmts. 0.00 0.00 2,272.00 (2,272.00) 1997-06 Toilet Replacemt Program 248,472.88 0.00 44,529.09 203,943.79 1997-08 Sewer Ill Repairs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-03 Water Storage Tanks (3) 0.00 1,419,546.00 4,956.60 1,414,589.40 1998-04 PAL Building Acquisition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-05 Commerce/Laguna Bikepath (1,278.00) 0.00 0.00 (1,278.00) 1998-06 Overlays-1998 435,759.95 0.00 0.00 435,759.95 1998-07 Copeland Crk. Bikepath Redo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-08 PAL Building Remodel 0.00 0.00 776.29 (776.29) 1998-09 Sidewalk Access Ramps (270.00) 0.00 0.00 (270.00) 1998-10 Emergency Driveway-P/S 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-02 Medical Ctr. Site Improvements (4,087.25) 0.00 (212.75) (3,874.50) 1999-03 City Hall 0.00 0.00 5,292.45 (5,292.45) 1999-05 G.I.S. Basemap 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-06 PS Water Imps/99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-09 M Pool 0.00 0.00 12,750.00 (12,750.00) 1999-10 Snyder Lane Widening 0.00 0.00 923.00 (923.00) Sub-total $501,481.57 $1,419,546.00 $373,615.53 $1,547,412.04 Add: Temporary Funding From Sewer Connection Fee Fund(Council Authorized) For Purchase of Street Light System(Project 1993-06) $375,403.00 Accounts Receivable (Reimbursement due Project 1996-06) (12,830.51) Total Improvement Project Fund $1,909,984.53 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Recap of Project Expenditures As of August 31, 1999 Est. Total Current Mo. Fiscal Year Expenditures Project Project No. and Description: Expenditures Expenditures Total Expenditures 1977-04 Transport Ave Ext. A.D. 0.00 0.00 1,275,422.74 1,305,000 1978-01 SnyderLn/HinebaughCr A.D. 0.00 0.00 572,379.87 595,700 1979-05 Classic Court Assess. Dist. 0.00 0.00 157,194.99 165,600 1979-10 Laguna Verde Assess. Dist. 0.00 0.00 1,521,881.45 1,533,000 1983-10 Professional Center Drive 0.00 0.00 530,849.06 548,900 1991-04 RPX/101 0/Cross-Phase II 281,778.05 302,044.85 837,119.12 1,885,000 1993-06 Street Lighting Acquisition 0.00 0.00 0.00 750,900 1994-07 Snyder Ln. Bikepath 284.00 284.00 319,448.20 350,000 1994-08 M Park-Phase II 0.00 0.00 346,451.61 185,000 1995-07 Rubberized RR Crossing 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000 1996-01 RPX lnterchng. Improvmts. 2,272.00 2,272.00 14,003.25 700,000 1997-06 Toilet Replacement Prog. 13,184.33 44,529.09 1,071,686.15 1,100,000 1997-08 Sewer I/I Repairs 0.00 0.00 4,213.50 30,000 1998-03 Water Storage Tanks(3) 4,956.60 4,956.60 99,183.85 1,450,000 1998-04 PAL Building Acquisition 0.00 0.00 784,803.78 800,000 1998-05 Commerce/Laguna Bikepath 0.00 0.00 1,278.00 50,000 1998-06 0ver1ays-1998 0.00 0.00 13,758.50 1,000,000 1998-07 Copeland Crk. Bikepath Redo 0.00 0.00 12,649.00 50,000 1998-08 PAL Building Remodel 741.27 776.29 16,642.86 40,000 1998-09 Sidewalk Access Ramps 0.00 0.00 270.00 200,000 1998-10 Emergency Driveway-P/S 0.00 0.00 4,391.00 70,500 1999-02 Medical Ctr. Site Improvement; (212.75) (212.75) 3,874.50 15,000 1999-03 City Hall 5,118.96 5,292.45 5,292.45 4,700,000 1999-05 G.I.S. Basemap 0.00 0.00 5,023.98 7,000 1999-06 PS Water Imps/99 0.00 0.00 12,175.00 15,000 1999-09 M Pool 12,750.00 12,750.00 12,750.00 700,000 1999-10 Snyder Ln. Widening 923.00 923.00 923.00 10,000 TOTALS $321,795.46 $373,615.53 $7,623,665.86 $18,316,600 CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Summary of Revenue and Expenditures As of August 31, 1999 Balance @ Current Fiscal Year Balance @ CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND: 30-Jun-99 Revenue Expenditures 31-Aug-99 Neighborhoods A & B $31,950.00 $0.00 $0.00 $31,950.00 Colegio Vista Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ladybug Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area West of Freeway 41,520.00 0.00 0.00 41,520.00 Eagle Park Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dorotea Park Area 991.63 0.00 0.00 991.63 Sunrise Park Area 6,440.00 0.00 0.00 6,440.00 Mt.Shadows/Coleman Valley 37,622.00 0.00 0.00 37,622.00 Rohnert Foothills (Area G) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S.of E.Cotati Ave.(M Section) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Foothills 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R Section 10,440.23 0.00 0.00 10,440.23 Community Facilities 505,845.78 0.00 0.00 505,845.78 Open Space 23,307.76 0.00 0.00 23,307.76 Subtotal $658,117.40 $0.00 $0.00 $658,117.40 Less: Accounts Receivable (Re: 4H of Sonoma Co. Deferred Fees) (3,300.00) Total Capital Outlay Fund $654,817.40 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM lY --- - To: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Mic ael L. Harrow City Manager Netter City Engineer Gaffney Finance Director City Attorney Flitner Assistant City Manager Leivo Accountant/Auditor Raymond Accounting Supervisor Lipitz Management Analyst Fogle Date: December 1, 1999 CASH BALANCES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 General Fund ($2,761,023.26) Payroll Account 0.00 Traffic Safety Fund 41,685.41 Motor Vehicle License Fees 497,124.69 R.E.M.I.F. (41,019.26) ($2,263,232.42) Special Water Connection Fee Fund 959,374.42 Per Acre For Development Fee Fund 1,895,886.01 Water/Wastewater Fee Fund(Dev. Imp. Fund) 12,898.44 Sewer Service Connection Fee Fund 6,202,682.38 Water/Wastewater Fee Fund(Spec. Sewer Conn. Fund) 12,898.44 Water Utility Fund 2,261,863.54 Sewer Utility Fund 2,445,615.84 Garbage Utility Fund 81,696.97 Garbage Utility Fund-Commercial Set-aside Fund 447,800.07 General Fund-Refundable Deposits 113,407.22 Utility Fund-Refundable Deposits 89,934.45 Improvement Project Fund 1,560,235.24 Gas Tax Fund: Sec. 2107 Maint./Const. $436,550.61 Sec. 2107.5 Engineering 6,000.00 Sec. 2106 Const./Maint. 1,089,124.89 Sec. 2105 310,733.14 SB 140 28,607.83 1,871,016.47 Transportation Development Act(TDA) Fund 4,000.00 Capital Outlay Fund 654,817.40 I.S.T.E.A. Fund 0.00 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Fund 5,924.00 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLESF) Fund 176,408.92 Fire Benefit Assessment(Measure M) Fund 29,140.82 Annexation Fees Fund 49,840.00 Rent Appeals Board Fund 60,160.63 Copeland Creek Drainage Facilities Fund 59,306.40 Debt Service Fund 0.00 Traffic Signals Fund 1,125,349.32 Vehicle Abatement Fund 53,767.55 Performing Arts Center Endowment Fund 1,617,396.00 Dental Self-Insurance Fund (1,466.70) Petty Cash 3,475.00 General Fund Reserve 1,916,865.00 Reserve For Self-Insured Losses 1,779,107.00 Reserve For Retired Employee Medical 895,500.00 Reserve For Infrastructure Maintenance 568,472.00 Reserve For P.E.R.S. Costs-Public Safety Employees 166,046.04 Reserve For P.E.R.S. Costs-Miscellaneous Employees 490,231.95 Reserve for Dev. of Add! Rec. Facilities 331,257.00 Cash With Leasing Company/Municipal Leasing 241,083.65 Miscellaneous Reserve(CDA Loan Principal Repayment) 203,495.11 Reserve For Housing Programs 506,904.00 Reserve For Active Employee Medical 306,733.00 Sub-Total Operating Cash 26,935,891.16 Special Enforcement Unit-South 21,593.57 Cash with Fiscal Agent (Earned Interest Fund) 27,118.70 Cash with Fiscal Agent (Refunding Dist 1983-10A) 0.00 Cash with Fiscal Agent (1993 Consolidated Refunding District) 499,860.04 Sub-Total City Cash 27,484,463.47 Employee Deferred Compensation(City is Trustee): Deterred Compensation- Washington Mutual 457 Plan 2,009,445.75 Deferred Compensation- ICMA 401(a) Plan 1,642,568.54 Deferred Compensation- ICMA 457 Plan-Full Time Employees 7,805,473.30 Deferred Compensation- Washington Mutual-Part Time Employees Plan 164,733.09 Total Employee Deferred Compensation 11,622,220.68 TOTAL CASH $39,106,684.15 CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 Petty Cash $3,475.00 Payroll Checking Account-Exchange Bank 0.00 General Checking Account-Exchange Bank @ 0.750% (460,252.56) Utility Checking Account-Exchange Bank @ 0.750% 3,080.69 Recreation Checking Account-Exchange Bank © 0.750% 2,345.47 Subtotal of Petty Cash and Checking Accounts (451,351.40) Investment Accounts-See Schedule of Investments Attached 27,667,612.52 Cash With Leasing Company/Municipal Leasing: Fidelity Investments @ 5.040% 241,083.65 Cash With Fiscal Agent (Earned Interest Fund) © 5.513% 27,118.70 Subtotal of Cash With Fiscal Agent 268,202.35 Employee Deferred Compensation(City is Trustee): 'Deferred Compensation-Washington Mutual 457 Plan 2,009,445.75 Deferred Compensation-ICMA 401(a) Plan 1,642,568.54 Deferred Compensation-ICMA 457 Plan-Full Time Employees 7,805,473.30 Deferred Compensation-Washington Mutual-Part-Time Employees Plan 164,733.09 Total Employee Deferred Compensation 11,622,220.68 Total Cash Distribution $39,106,684.15 Investment Yield for SEPTEMBER 1999 5.702% INVESTMENT POLICY&SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #99-60, adopted March 23, 1999. The City currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six months. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK-SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS-SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 source of Investment Maturity Interest Par Value of Curr. Mkt. Val. Investment Investment Institution Type Date Rate Investment Of Investment Valuation Exchange Bank Savings Passbook Svgs N/A © 2.000% $381,000.00 $381,000.00 Note (1) First Bank of Beverly Hills Cert.of Deposit 10/18/99 © 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Capital Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/24/99 © 5.920% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Capital Bank Cert.of Deposit 11/03/99 @ 6.210% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Natl. Bank in Brookings Cert.of Deposit 11/15/99 © 5.951% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Advanta Financial Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/02/99 © 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Hamilton Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/21/99 © 5.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Eaton Federal Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/27/99 © 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Advanta National Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/26/00 @ 6.400% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) MBNA America Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/28/00 © 6.350% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Deposit National Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/28/00 © 6.300% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Providian National Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/28/00 @ 6.300% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Bank of Mt. Vernon Cert.of Deposit 03/06/00 © 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank N.D. Cert.of Deposit 03/06/00 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Ocwen Federal Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/06/00 © 6.450% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Insouth Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/20/00 @ 6.450% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Merrick Bank Corporation Cert.of Deposit 03/20/00 © 5.710% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Atlantic Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 03/27/00 © 6.050% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Atlantic Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/03/00 © 6.050% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Central Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/10/00 @ 6.660% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) International Bank of Miami Cert.of Deposit 04/26/00 @ 5.300% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) National Republic Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/30/00 © 6.910% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) United Credit National Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/01/00 @ 5.600% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Intercredit Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/12/00 @ 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Southern Pacific Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/12/00 @ 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) CreditAmerica Savings Cert.of Deposit 06/17/00 © 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Upstate National Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/25/00 © 5.970% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Nevada Cert.of Deposit 06/29/00 © 6.010% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Gulf Coast Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 07/17/00 @ 6.290% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Citizens Fed. Svgs. Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/28/00 © 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Franklin Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/28/00 © 5.950% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Approved Federal Svgs. & Loan Cert.of Deposit 09/01/00 © 5.901% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Pullman Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 09/16/00 @ 5.860% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Crescent Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/26/00 © 6.420% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Metropolitan Bank & Trust Cert.of Deposit 09/28/00 @ 5.901% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Michigan Heritage Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/08/00 @ 6.410% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Argo Federal Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 12/21/00 @ 5.370% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Superior Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/13/01 © 5.370% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First State Bank of Colorado Cert.of Deposit 01/27/01 © 5.400% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Jefferson Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 02/05/01 © 6.160% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Premier Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/11/01 © 6.150% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Redwood Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/11/01 © 6.100% 500,000.00 500,000.00 Note (1) Family Federal Savings Cert.of Deposit 03/12/01 @ 6.630% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Mid America Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/06/01 @ 5.810% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Family Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/14/01 © 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Liberty Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/15/01 @ 5.460% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Farmers Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/28/01 @ 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Eaton Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/28/01 © 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cole Taylor Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/06/01 © 5.520% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Golden Security Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/11/01 © 6.100% 90,000.00 90,000.00 Note (1) Provident Bank of Maryland Cert.of Deposit 05/13/01 © 5.510% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Citizens State Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 © 6.140% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Financial Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 © 6.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Chevy Chase Fed. Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 © 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Mountain West Bank of Helena Cert.of Deposit 05/28/01 @ 5.507% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Saratoga National Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/04/01 © 6.200% 300,000.00 300,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Michigan Cert.of Deposit 06/12/01 © 6.200% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) NAB Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/12/01 © 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Valencia National Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/24/01 © 5.350% 300,000.00 300,000.00 Note (1) First Bank of Brunswick Cert.of Deposit 07/31/01 © 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Amcore Bank N.A. Cert.of Deposit 08/04/01 © 6.210% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Enterprise Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/05/01 © 6.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First America Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 08/06/01 © 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cornbelt Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 08/06/01 © 6.000% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Milwaukee Western Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/10/01 © 6.400% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Bay Financial Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/13/01 @ 6.070% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Community First Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/13/01 @ 6.050% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) American Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/01/01 © 5.900% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Associates National Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/17/01 © 5.750% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Georgetown Bank & Trust Cert.of Deposit 09/17/01 @ 6.450% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Treasury Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/18/01 © 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Citizens Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/21/01 © 5.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Parkvale Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/16/01 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Feliciana Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/23/01 © 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Republic Bank Cert.of Deposit 10/26/01 © 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) State Bank &Trust Cert.of Deposit 10/30/01 @ 5.450% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Advanta National Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/13/02 © 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Greene County Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/01/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Capital One Bank Cert.of Deposit 02/02/02 © 5.540% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) M&T Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/03/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Great Southern Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/16/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Commerce National Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/17/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FNB Southwest Cert.of Deposit 03/26/02 @ 5.560% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Oakwood Deposit Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/08/02 @ 5.600% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Bank of Arkansas Cert.of Deposit 04/26/02 @ 5.500% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Landmark Community Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/21/02 @ 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) BankFirst N.A. Cert.of Deposit 06/15/02 @ 6.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Houston Community Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/14/02 © 6.250% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cross Country Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/25/02 @ 6.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First Natl. Bk. of the Rockies Cert.of Deposit 08/08/02 @ 6.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Union Bank of the West Cert.of Deposit 09/04/02 @ 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 09/09/02 @ 5.715% 500,000.00 491,720.00 Note (2) Pocahontas Federal S&L Cert.of Deposit 09/09/02 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (2) Fidelity Federal Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 09/16/02 © 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (2) Provident Bank of Ohio Cert.of Deposit 12/18/02 © 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Pendleton Federal Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/11/03 © 5.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. Cert.of Deposit 02/09/03 @ 5.500% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) East Stroudsburg Savings Cert.of Deposit 02/25/03 @ 5.550% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 04/07/03 @ 6.000% 1,000,000.00 984,060.00 Note (2) Commerce National Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/14/03 @ 5.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) International Finance Bank Cert.of Deposit 04/21/03 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) San Jose National Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/04/03 @ 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) National Penn Bank Cert.of Deposit 05/21/03 @ 5.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Capital One Federal Svgs Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/19/03 @ 6.250% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Shelby County Bank Cert.of Deposit 07/28/03 @ 6.320% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Nations Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/03/03 @ 5.500% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Credicard National Bank Cert.of Deposit 08/19/03 @ 6.300% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 10/29/03 @ 6.020% 1,000,000.00 979,380.00 Note (2) Keybank USA Cert.of Deposit 11/05/03 © 5.700% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 11/18/03 © 6.000% 500,000.00 486,720.00 Note (2) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 01/05/04 @ 6.000% 1,000,000.00 977,190.00 Note (2) Alfalfa County Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/11/04 @ 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 01/20/04 @ 6.060% 500,000.00 489,220.00 Note (2) Heritage Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 01/26/04 © 5.550% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Klamath First Federal S&L Cert.of Deposit 02/16/04 @ 5.540% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FNMA Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 02/19/04 @ 6.000% 500,000.00 487,075.00 Note (1) The Bank of Sharon Cert.of Deposit 02/26/04 @ 5.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Hartford Carlisle Savings Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/03/04 © 5.750% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Pacific State Bank Cert.of Deposit 03/22/04 @ 5.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) FNMA Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 04/26/04 © 6.020% 500,000.00 486,825.00 Note (2) FHLMC Medium Term Note Medium Term Note 05/10/04 @ 6.135% 498,828.13 489,220.00 Note (2) FHLB Med. Term Step-up Note Medium Term Note 06/01/04 © 5.750% 500,000.00 486,030.00 Note (1) Park Avenue Bank Cert.of Deposit 06/04/04 © 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Marin Cert.of Deposit 06/28/04 @ 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) First National Bank of Chicago Cert.of Deposit 08/11/04 © 6.750% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) FHLB Med. Term Note Cert.of Deposit 08/17/04 @ 7.050% 500,000.00 498,440.00 Note (1) Bank One Cert.of Deposit 08/19/04 @ 6.620% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Bank USA Cert.of Deposit 09/21/04 @ 6.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) State of Calif.-LAIF Pooled Investments N/A @ 5.178% 7,400,000.00 7,400,000.00 Note (3) Sonoma Co.Investmt. Pool Pooled Investments N/A @ 5.130% 96,924.35 96,924.35 Note (4) Subtotal $27,167,752.48 $27,024,804.35 1983-10 Ref.Dist.Res.-So.Co. © 5.080% 0.00 0.00 Note (5) 1993 Consol.Ref.Dist.-So.Co. © 5.080% 499,860.04 499,860.04 Note (5) Totals $27,667,612.52 $27,524,664.39 Note (1) These are investments in Certificates of Deposit. Current Market Value and Par Value are typically equal. Note (2) Gilford Securities current market values as of September 30, 1999 are presented. Note (3) These are funds invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund, State of California. Current Market Value and Par Value are typically equal. Interest is received quarterly and the Par Value remains the same. Note (4) These are funds invested in the Sonoma County Investment Pool. Current Market Value and Par Value are typically equal. Interest is received quarterly and the Par Value remains the same. Note (5) These funds are being held by Sonoma County acting as a Fiscal Agent for the City of Rohnert Park. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Summary of Revenue & Expenditures As Of September 30, 1999 Balance @ Current Fiscal Year Balance @ Project No. and Description 30-Jun-99 Revenue Expenditures 30-Sep-99 1977-04 Transport Avenue Ext.A.D. 29,487.98 0.00 0.00 29,487.98 1978-01 SnyderLn/Hinebaugh Cr A.D. 23,319.67 0.00 0.00 23,319.67 1979-05 Classic Ct. Assess.Dist. 8,387.21 0.00 0.00 8,387.21 1979-10 Laguna Verde Assess.Dist. 11,122.68 0.00 0.00 11,122.68 1983-10 Professional Ctr Dr.A.D. 18,048.39 0.00 0.00 18,048.39 1991-04 RPX/101 0/Cross-Phase II 119,560.78 0.00 466,456.92 (346,896.14) 1993-06 Street Lighting Acquisition (375,403.00) 0.00 0.00 (375,403.00) 1994-07 Snyder Lane Bikepath (161,639.72) 0.00 284.00 (161,923.72) 1994-08 M Park-Phase II 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1995-07 Rubberized RR Crossing 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 1996-01 RPX Interchng. Improvmts. 0.00 0.00 2,272.00 (2,272.00) 1997-06 Toilet Replacemt Program 248,472.88 0.00 52:139.09 196,333.79 1997-08 Sewer Ill Repairs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-03 Water Storage Tanks (3) 0.00 1,419,546.00 4,956.60 1,414,589.40 1998-04 PAL Building Acquisition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-05 Commerce/Laguna Bikepath (1,278.00) 0.00 0.00 (1,278.00) 1998-06 Overlays-1998 435,759.95 0.00 136,959.95 298,800.00 1998-07 Copeland Crk. Bikepath Redo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998-08 PAL Building Remodel 0.00 0.00 2,669.47 (2,669.47) 1998-09 Sidewalk Access Ramps (270.00) 0.00 0.00 (270.00) 1998-10 Emergency Driveway-P/S 0.00 0.00 22,585.68 (22,585.68) 1999-02 Medical Ctr. Site Improvements (4,087.25) 0.00 (212.75) (3,874.50) 1999-03 City Hall 0.00 0.00 10,955.86 (10,955.86) 1999-05 G.I.S. Basemap 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-06 PS Water Imps/99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-09 M Pool 0.00 0.00 23,375.00 (23,375.00) 1999-10 Snyder Lane Widening 0.00 0.00 923.00 (923.00) Sub-total $501,481.57 $1,419,546.00 $723,364.82 $1,197,662.75 Add: Temporary Funding From Sewer Connection Fee Fund(Council Authorized) For Purchase of Street Light System(Project 1993-06) $375,403.00 Accounts Receivable (Reimbursement due Project 1996-06) (12,830.51) Total Improvement Project Fund $1,560,235.24 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Recap of Project Expenditures As of September 30, 1999 Est. Total Current Mo. Fiscal Year Expenditures Project Project No. and Description: Expenditures Expenditures Total Expenditures 1977-04 Transport Ave Ext. A.D. 0.00 0.00 1,275,422.74 1,305,000 1978-01 SnyderLn/HinebaughCr A.D. 0.00 0.00 572,379.87 595,700 1979-05 Classic Court Assess. Dist. 0.00 0.00 157,194.99 165,600 1979-10 Laguna Verde Assess. Dist. 0.00 0.00 1,521,881.45 1,533,000 1983-10 Professional Center Drive 0.00 0.00 530,849.06 548,900 1991-04 RPX/101 0/Cross-Phase II 164,412.07 466,456.92 1,001,531.19 1,885,000 1993-06 Street Lighting Acquisition 0.00 0.00 0.00 750,900 1994-07 Snyder Ln. Bikepath 0.00 284.00 319,448.20 350,000 1994-08 M Park-Phase II 0.00 0.00 346,451.61 185,000 1995-07 Rubberized RR Crossing 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000 1996-01 RPX lnterchng. Improvmts. 0.00 2,272.00 14,003.25 700,000 1997-06 Toilet Replacement Prog. 7,610.00 52,139.09 1,079,296.15 1,100,000 1997-08 Sewer I/I Repairs 0.00 0.00 4,213.50 30,000 1998-03 Water Storage Tanks(3) 0.00 4,956.60 99,183.85 1,450,000 1998-04 PAL Building Acquisition 0.00 0.00 784,803.78 800,000 1998-05 Commerce/Laguna Bikepath 0.00 0.00 1,278.00 50,000 1998-06 Overlays-1998 136,959.95 136,959.95 150,718.45 1,000,000 1998-07 Copeland Crk. Bikepath Redo 0.00 0.00 12,649.00 50,000 1998-08 PAL Building Remodel 1,893.18 2,669.47 18,536.04 40,000 1998-09 Sidewalk Access Ramps 0.00 0.00 270.00 200,000 1998-10 Emergency Driveway-P/S 22,585.68 22,585.68 26,976.68 70,500 1999-02 Medical Ctr. Site Improvement! 0.00 (212.75) 3,874.50 15,000 1999-03 City Hall 5,663.41 10,955.86 10,955.86 4,700,000 1999-05 G.I.S. Basemap 0.00 0.00 5,023.98 7,000 1999-06 PS Water Imps/99 0.00 0.00 12,175.00 15,000 1999-09 M Pool 10,625.00 23,375.00 23,375.00 700,000 1999-10 Snyder Ln. Widening 0.00 923.00 923.00 10,000 TOTALS $349,749.29 $723,364.82 $7,973,415.15 $18,316,600 CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Summary of Revenue and Expenditures As of September 30, 1999 Balance @ Current Fiscal Year Balance @ CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND: 30-Jun-99 Revenue Expenditures 30-Sep-99 Neighborhoods A & B $31,950.00 $0.00 $0.00 $31,950.00 Colegio Vista Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ladybug Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area West of Freeway 41,520.00 0.00 0.00 41,520.00 Eagle Park Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dorotea Park Area 991.63 0.00 0.00 991.63 Sunrise Park Area 6,440.00 0.00 0.00 6,440.00 Mt.Shadows/Coleman Valley 37,622.00 0.00 0.00 37,622.00 Rohnert Foothills (Area G) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S.of E.Cotati Ave.(M Section) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Foothills 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R Section 10,440.23 0.00 0.00 10,440.23 Community Facilities 505,845.78 0.00 0.00 505,845.78 Open Space 23,307.76 0.00 0.00 23,307.76 Subtotal $658,117.40 $0.00 $0.00 $658,117.40 Less: Accounts Receivable (Re: 4H of Sonoma Co. Deferred Fees) (3,300.00) Total Capital Outlay Fund $654,817.40 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM 71/7V Michael L. Harrow TO: The Chairman and Members of the Community FROM: Treasurer Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park Executive Director Netter City Engineer Gaffney Asst. to the Exec. Dir. Leivo City Attorney Strauss Accountant/Auditor Raymond Accounting Supervisor Lipitz Management Analyst Fogle DATE: November 12, 1999 CASH BALANCES AS OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Improvement Project Fund ($24,409.75) 81,830.40 Cash From Property Tax Increment Low& Moderate Income Housing Fund 2,074,770.25 0.25 ,28 Cash With Fiscal Agent-97% 07 Loan Fund 1,7 Innovative Housing Rent Fund 241.90 .5 8, 50.75 , 1 45, Interest From Bond Proceeds 5 Refundable Deposits-Innovative Housing Rents 141396.2 Interest From Increment 184.58 5 Debt Service Fund (1991 TARB) Debt Service Reserve Fund (1991 TARB) 1,065,878.94 Lease Payment Fund (1991 RCOP) 344.38 Redevelopment Fund (1999 TABs) 10,578,507.02 Debt Service Reserve Fund (1999 TABs) 920,413.18 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CASH $15,188,336.67 CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Checking Accounts: Interest Rate Exchange Bank Checking Account 0.75% $32,170.94 Housing Rehabilitation Checking AMC Exchange Bank 0.75% 36,352.76 Subtotal-Checking Accounts $68,523.70 Investment Accounts: Investment Maturity Interest Source of Investment Institution Type Date Rate Par Value Market Value Valuation Exchange Bank Passbook N/A 2.020% 352,364.34 352,364.34 Note (1) Credit America Savings Cert.of Dep. 12/13/99 6.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Providian National Bank Cert.of Dep. 03/16/00 5.920% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Valencia National Bank Cert.of Dep. 06/23/00 5.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Franklin Thrift & Loan Cert.of Dep. 07/10/00 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Key Bank USA Cert.of Dep. 05/04/02 5.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cross Country Bank Cert.of Dep. 10/01/02 6.800% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Capital One Fed. Svgs. Cert.of Dep. 06/19/03 6.250% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Hartford Carlisle Svgs. Cert.of Dep. 03/09/04 5.750% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) First Nat. Bk. Of Keystone Cert.of Dep. 05/12/04 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) State of Calif.-LAIF Pooled Invs. N/A 5.180% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 Note (1) Sonoma Co Invsmt Pool Pooled lnvs. N/A 5.130% 15,439.63 15,439.63 Note (1) 2,262,803.97 2,262,803.97 2,262,803.97 CASH HELD BY FISCAL AGENTS: Investment Maturity Interest Investment Institution Type Date Rate Par Value Market Value Exchange Bk-97% Ln Fd Trust Acct. N/A 5.024% 291,680.90 291,680.90 Note (1) 291,680.90 First Trust-1991 TARB's: Interest Fund: Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund N/A 5.170% 183.05 183.05 Note (1) Tax Allocation Principal Fund: Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund N/A 5.170% 1.53 1.53 Note (1) Tax Allocation Refunding Reserve Fund: FHLMC MIT Note M/T Note 11/25/08 6.430% 1,000,000.00 945,600.00 Note (2) Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund N/A 5.170% 65,878.94 65,878.94 Note (1) 1,066,063.52 Total 1991 TARB Reserve and Interest Fund 1,066,063.52 1,011,663.52_ 1994 Lease Payment Fund: Pacific Horizon Treasury Fund 5.170% 344.38 344.38 Note (1) COP Lease Payment Fund: Pacific Horizon Treasury Fund 5.170% 0.00 0.00 Note (1) Total 1991 C.O.P. Funded Interest 344.38 344.38 344.38 Us Bank-Trustee-1999 TABs: 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Redevelopment Fund: First Amer. Treas. Note Treas. Note N/A 5.178% 5,565,214.88 5,565,214.88 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note MIT Note 03/22/01 5.400% 1,000,000.00 988,800.00 Note (2) FNMA MIT Note M/T Note 06/12/00 5.300% 705,578.13 698,950.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note MIT Note 08/18/00 5.400% 704,156.25 696,990.00 Note (2) FNMA MIT Note MIT Note 10/16/00 5.400% 792,125.00 786,720.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note MIT Note 02/22/01 5.500% 800,000.00 790,560.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 04/12/01 5.440% 1,000,000.00 989,200.00 Note (2) First Amer. Treas. Note Treas. Note N/A 4.300% 11,432.76 11,432.76 Note (2) 10,578,507.02 Total 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Redevelopment Fund: 10,578,507.02 10,527,867.64 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Reserve Fund: FNMA MIT Note M/T Note 2/25/02 5.700% 890,000.00 871,844.00 Note (2) First Amer. Treas. Note Treas. Note N/A 4.400% 930,413.18 0,413.18 900,253.18 Note (2) 920,413.18 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CASH $15,188,336.67 Investment Yield for AUGUST 1999 5.323% INVESTMENT POLICY & SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy of the Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #99-60, adopted on March 23, 1999. The Commission currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six months. Note (1) The source of valuation for these investments is their respective monthly statements. The Par Value and Market Value for these investments are typically the same as interest is paid or wired monthly. Note(2) The source of valuation for this investment is the August 31, 1999 US Bank Trust Statement. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 Summary of Revenue and Expeditures As of August 31, 1999 ACTIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PROJECTS: Balance @ Current Fiscal Year Balance @ Project No. and Description 30-Jun-99 Revenue Expenditures 31-Aug-99 1991-01 Commerce Bl. Bikepath $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1991-04 RPX/101 Overcrossing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-03 City Hall Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999-04 Library (19,827.50) 0.00 4,582.25 (24,409.75) Totals ($19,827.50) $0.00 $4,582.25 ($24,409.75) Add: Accounts Payable-Proj. 99-04 $19,827.50 0.00 $0.00 ($24,409.75) PROJECTS SINCE INCEPTION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: Est. Total Current Mo. Fiscal Year Expenditures Project Project No. and Description: Expenditures Expenditures Total Expenditures 1 C:30-04 Performing Arts Center Closed Closed 7,343,365.73 7,343,366 1984-21 Expressway Extension Closed Closed 1,297,481.39 1,297,482 1986-25 Seed Farm Drive Extens Closed Closed 30,867.66 30,868 1987-15 Roberts Lake Road Closed Closed 1,547,369.43 1,547,369 1988-15 Swim Center Closed Closed 144,688.38 144,689 1988-18 Public Safety Building Closed Closed 7,184,580.56 7,185,000 1988-23 Senior Center Closed Closed 851,620.35 851,621 1989-12 RP Expwy Widening Closed Closed 308,383.61 308,384 1990-02 R.P.J.H. Gym/Bldg Closed Closed 750,000.00 750,000 1990-05 A Park Lights Closed Closed 93,897.69 93,898 1990-14 Animal Shelter Closed Closed 1,393,699.43 1,393,700 1991-01 Commerce BI. Bikepath 0.00 0.00 120,476.95 161,000 1991-04 RPX/101 Overcrossing 0.00 0.00 374,340.99 375,000 1992-01 SW Blvd Landscaping Closed Closed 11,803.35 11,804 1999-03 City Hall Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,700,000 1999-04 Library 4,582.25 4,582.25 8,166.29 4,000,000 Totals $4,582.25 $4,582.25 $21,460,741.81 $30,194,181 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: The Chairman and Members of the Community FROM: Michael L. Harrow Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park Treasurer Executive Director Netter City Engineer Gaffney Asst. to the Exec. Dir. Leivo City Attorney Strauss Accountant/Auditor Raymond Accounting Supervisor Lipitz Management Analyst Fogle DATE: December 7, 1999 CASH BALANCES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 Improvement Project Fund $0.00 Cash From Property Tax Increment 81,830.40 Low& Moderate Income Housing Fund 2,081,429.41 Cash With Fiscal Agent-97% Loan Fund 291,680.90 Innovative Housing Rent Fund 5,241.51 Interest From Bond Proceeds 48,650.75 Refundable Deposits-Innovative Housing Rents 3,396.26 Interest From Increment 141,872.83 Debt Service Fund (1991 TARB) 364.80 Debt Service Reserve Fund (1991 TARB) 1,066,127.59 Lease Payment Fund (1991 RCOP) 345.63 Redevelopment Fund (1999 TABs) 10,520,480.18 Debt Service Reserve Fund (1999 TABs) 920,451.61 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CASH $15,161,871.87 CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 Checking Accounts: Interest Rate Exchange Bank Checking Account 0.75% $25,628.77 Housing Rehabilitation Checking A\C Exchange Bank 0.75% 36,352.76 Subtotal-Checking Accounts $61,981.53 Investment Accounts: Investment Maturity Interest Source of Investment Institution Type Date Rate Par Value Market Value Valuation Exchange Bank Passbook N/A 2.020% 390,000.00 390,000.00 Note (1) Credit America Savings Cert.of Dep. 12/13/99 6.750% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Providian National Bank Cert.of Dep. 03/16/00 5.920% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Valencia National Bank Cert.of Dep. 06/23/00 5.200% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Franklin Thrift & Loan Cert.of Dep. 07/10/00 6.100% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Key Bank USA Cert.of Dep. 05/04/02 5.650% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) Cross Country Bank Cert.of Dep. 10/01/02 6.800% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Capital One Fed. Svgs. Cert.of Dep. 06/19/03 6.250% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) Hartford Carlisle Svgs. Cert.of Dep. 03/09/04 5.750% 100,000.00 100,000.00 Note (1) First Nat. Bk. Of Keystone Cert.of Dep. 05/12/04 6.500% 99,000.00 99,000.00 Note (1) State of Calif.-LAIF Pooled lnvs. N/A 5.180% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 Note (1) Sonoma Co Invsmt Pool Pooled lnvs. N/A 5.130% 15,439.63 15,439.63 Note (1) 2,300,439.63 2,300,439.63 2,300,439.63 CASH HELD BY FISCAL AGENTS: Investment Maturity Interest Investment Institution Type Date Rate Par Value Market Value Exchange Bk-97% Ln Fd Trust Acct. N/A 5.024% 291,680.90 291,680.90 Note (1) 291,680.90 First Trust-1991 TARB's: Interest Fund: Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund N/A 5.170% 363.27 363.27 Note (1) Tax Allocation Principal Fund: Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund N/A 5.170% 1.53 1.53 Note (1) Tax Allocation Refunding Reserve Fund: FHLMC M/T Note M/T Note 11/25/08 6.430% 1,000,000.00 945,600.00 Note (2) Fidelity Money Fund Mutual Fund N/A 5.170% 66,127.59 66,127.59 Note (1) Total 1991 TARB Reserve and Interest Fund 1,066,492.39 1,012,092.39 1,066,492.39 1994 Lease Payment Fund: Pacific Horizon Treasury Fund 5.170% 345.63 345.63 Note (1) COP Lease Payment Fund: Pacific Horizon Treasury Fund 5.170% 0.00 0.00 Note (1) Total 1991 C.O.P. Funded Interest 345.63 345.63 345.63 US Bank-Trustee-1999 TABs: 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Redevelopment Fund: First Amer. Treas. Note Treas. Note N/A 5.178% 5,507,145.02 5,507,145.02 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 03/22/01 5.400% 1,000,000.00 988,800.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 06/12/00 5.300% 705,578.13 698,950.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 08/18/00 5.400% 704,156.25 696,990.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 10/16/00 5.400% 792,125.00 786,720.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 02/22/01 5.500% 800,000.00 790,560.00 Note (2) FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 04/12/01 5.440% 1,000,000.00 989,200.00 Note (2) First Amer. Treas. Note Treas. Note N/A 4.300% 11,475.78 11,475.78 Note (2) Total 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Redevelopment Fund: 10,520,480.18 10,469,840.80 10,520,480.18 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Reserve Fund: FNMA M/T Note M/T Note 2/25/02 5.700% 890,000.00 871,844.00 Note (2) First Amer. Treas. Note Treas. Note N/A 4.400% 30,451.61 30,451.61 Note (2) 920,451.61 902,295.61 920,451.61 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CASH $15,161,871.87 Investment Yield for SEPTEMBER 1999 5.318% INVESTMENT POLICY&SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy of the Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #99-60, adopted on March 23, 1999. The Commission currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six months. Note (1) The source of valuation for these investments is their respective monthly statements. The Par Value and Market Value for these investments are typically the same as interest is paid or wired monthly. Note(2) The source of valuation for this investment is the September 30, 1999 US Bank Trust Statement. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 Summary of Revenue and Expeditures As of September 30, 1999 ACTIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PROJECTS: Balance @ Current Fiscal Year Balance @ Project No. and Description 30-Jun-99 Revenue Expenditures 30-Sep-99 1999-04 Library ($19,827.50) $0.00 $66,189.84 ($86,017.34) 1999-04 Library Funding(Bonds) 5,000,000.00 33,312.97 0.00 5,033,312.97 Other CDC Projects(TBD) 5,536,298.45 36,886.10 0.00 5,573,184.55 Totals 10,516,470.95 $70,199.07 $66,189.84 $10,520,480.18 Add: Accounts Payable-Proj.#1999-04 19,827.50 0.00 $10,536,298.45 $10,520,480.18 PROJECTS SINCE INCEPTION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: Total Current Mo. Fiscal Year Expenditures Project Project No. and Description: Expenditures Expenditures Total Expenditures 1980-04 Performing Arts Center Closed Closed 7,343,365.73 $7,343,366 1984-21 Expressway Extension Closed Closed 1,297,481.39 1,297,482 1986-25 Seed Farm Drive Extension Closed Closed 30,867.66 30,868 1987-15 Roberts Lake Road Closed Closed 1,547,369.43 1,547,370 1988-15 Swim Center Closed Closed 144,688.38 144,689 1988-18 Public Safety Building Closed Closed 7,184,580.56 7,185,000 1988-23 Senior Center Closed Closed 851,620.35 851,621 1989-12 RP Expwy Widening Closed Closed 308,383.61 308,384 1990-02 R.P.J.H. Gym/Bldg Closed Closed 750,000.00 750,000 1990-05 A Park Lights Closed Closed 93,897.69 93,898 1990-14 Animal Shelter Closed Closed 1,393,699.43 1,393,700 1991-01 Commerce Bl. Bikepath Closed Closed 120,476.95 161,000 1991-04 RPX/101 Overcrossing Closed Closed 374,340.99 375,000 1992-01 SW Blvd Landscaping Closed Closed 11,803.35 11,804 1999-04 Library 61,607.59 66,189.84 89,601.38 5,000,000 Totals $61,607.59 $66,189.84 $21,542,176.90 $26,494,182 ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM Michael L. Harrow TO: The Chairman and Board Members of the FROM: Authority Treasurer Rohnert Park Financing Authority Executive Director Netter City Engineer Gaffney Management Analyst Fogle City &Authority Attorney Strauss Accountant/Auditor Raymond Accounting Supervisor Lipitz DATE: November 12, 1999 CASH BALANCES AS OF AUGUST 31, 1999 1999 C.O.P.'s-Capital Facilities Project: .29 77 Capital Project Fund-1999 C.O.P.'s $4,777,236.29 of Issuance Fund-1999 C.O.P.'s 1,236236, 5.26 11 . 9 Lease Payment Fund-1999 C.O.P.'s 1999 C.O.P.'s-Master Equipment Lease Program: ,041.26 104,046 .2 Debt Service Fund-1999 Master Equipment Lease 10 Debt Service Reserve Fund-1999 Master Equipment Lease 1,295,306.65 Capital Project Fund-1999 Master Equipment Lease TOTAL ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY CASH $6,389,996.35 CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF AUGUST 31, 1999 CASH HELD BY FISCAL AGENTS: Maturity Interest Source of Investment Institution Date Rate Par Value Market Value Valuation Trust Accounts at US Bank: 1999 C.O.P.'s Capital Facilities Project Funds: 1999 C.O.P.'s Lease Payment Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $9,067.15 $9,067.15 Note (1) Total $9,067.15 $9,067.15 $9,067.15 1999 C.O.P.'s Capital Project Fund: Local Agency Investment Fund N/A 5.136% $1,500,000.00 $1,500,000.00 Note (1) First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $371,580.03 $371,580.03 Note (1) FHLB Bond 04/14/00 5.500% 402,312.50 399,360.00 Note (2) FHLB Bond 07/14/00 5.500% 603,984.38 598,140.00 Note (2) FNMA Medium Term Note 06/12/00 5.650% 705,578.13 698,950.00 Note (2) FNMA Medium Term Note 10/16/00 4.450% 396,062.50 393,360.00 Note (2) FNMA Medium Term Note 12/15/00 4.870% 797,718.75 788,560.00 Note (2) Total $4,777,236.29 $4,768,084.33 4,777,236.29 1999 C.O.P.'s Costs of Issuance Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.250% $21,115.46 $21,115.46 Note (1) 21,115.46 1999 Master Equipment Lease Funds: 1999 Master Equipment Lease-Lease Payment Funds: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $104,041.26 $104,041.26 Note (1) 104,041.26 1999 Master Equipment Lease-Reserve Funds: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $183,229.54 $183,229.54 Note (1) 183,229.54 1999 Master Equipment Lease-Capital Project Funds: 1999 Series A-3 Year Equipment Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $118,527.21 $118,527.21 Note (1) 118,527.21 19.99 Series A-5 Year Equipment Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $1,152,673.58 $1,152,673.58 Note (1) 1,152,673.58 1999 Master Equipment Lease-Costs of Issuance Funds: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $24,105.86 $24,105.86 Note (1) 24,105.86 TOTAL ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY CASH $6,389,996.35 Investment Yield for AUGUST 1999 4.945% INVESTMENT POLICY& SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #99-60, adopted on March 23, 1999. The Authority currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six months. Note(1) The source of valuation for this investment is the August 31, 1999 US Bank Trust Statement. However, the Par Valu and Market Value are typically the same as interest is credited monthly. Note(2) The source of valuation for this investment is the August 31, 1999 US Bank Trust Statement. ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM )/i4 TO: The Chairman and Board Members of the FROM: Michael L. Harrow Rohnert Park Financing Authority Authority Treasurer Executive Director Netter City Engineer Gaffney Management Analyst Fogle City &Authority Attorney Strauss Accountant/Auditor Raymond Accounting Supervisor Lipitz DATE: December 3, 1999 CASH BALANCES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 1999 C.O.P.'s-Capital Facilities Project: Capital Project Fund-1999 C.O.P.'s $4,778,634.68 Costs of Issuance Fund-1999 C.O.P.'s 21,194.93 Lease Payment Fund-1999 C.O.P.'s 9,101.27 1999 C.O.P.'s-Master Equipment Lease Program: Debt Service Fund-1999 Master Equipment Lease 104,135.94 Debt Service Reserve Fund-1999 Master Equipment Lease 184,600.24 Capital Project Fund-1999 Master Equipment Lease 1,300,240.93 TOTAL ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY CASH $6,397,907.99 CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 • CASH HELD BY FISCAL AGENTS: Maturity Interest Source of Investment Institution Date Rate Par Value Market Value Valuation Trust Accounts at US Bank: 1999 C.O.P.'s Capital Facilities Project Funds: 1999 C.O.P.'s Lease Payment Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $9,101.27 $9,101.27 Note (1) Total $9,101.27 $9,101.27 $9,101.27 1999 C.O.P.'s Capital Project Fund: Local Agency Investment Fund N/A 5.136% $1,500,000.00 $1,500,000.00 Note (1) First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $372,978.42 $372,978.42 Note (1) FHLB Bond 04/14/00 5.500% 402,312.50 399,760.00 Note (2) FHLB Bond 07/14/00 5.500% 603,984.38 598,680.00 Note (2) FNMA Medium Term Note 06/12/00 5.650% 705,578.13 700,000.00 Note (2) FNMA Medium Term Note 10/16/00 4.450% 396,062.50 394,160.00 Note (2) FNMA Medium Term Note 12/15/00 4.870% 797,718.75 790,080.00 Note (2) Total $4,778,634.68 $4,755,658.42 4,778,634.68 1999 C.O.P.'s Costs of Issuance Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.250% $21,194.93 $21,194.93 Note (1) 21,194.93 1999 Master Equipment Lease Funds: 1999 Master Equipment Lease-Lease Payment Funds: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $104,135.94 $104,135.94 Note (1) 104,135.94 1999 Master Equipment Lease-Reserve Funds: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $184,600.24 $184,600.24 Note (1) 184,600.24 1999 Master Equipment Lease-Capital Project Funds: 1999 Series A-3 Year Equipment Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $118,973.28 $118,973.28 Note (1) 118,973.28 1999 Series A-5 Year Equipment Fund: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $1,157,071.08 $1,157,071.08 Note (1) 1,157,071.08 1999 Master Equipment Lease-Costs of Issuance Funds: First American Treas Obligations N/A 4.400% $24,196.57 $24,196.57 Note (1) 24,196.57 TOTAL ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY CASH $6,397,907.99 Investment Yield for SEPTEMBER 1999 4.945% INVESTMENT POLICY&SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES The investments above are in compliance with the investment policy of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #99-60, adopted on March 23, 1999. The Authority currently has sufficient idle funds to meet it's expenditure requirements for the next six months. Note(1) The source of valuation for this investment is the September 30, 1999 US Bank Trust Statement. However, the Par Value and Market Value are typically the same as interest is credited and paid monthly. Note(2) The source of valuation for this investment is the September 30, 1999 US Bank Trust Statement. 4j kallilliii7 4. RESOLUTION N0.99 251 4 111 '-''c A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ilk RECOGNIZING LIEUTENANT NICOLE AUNAPU, U.S.M.C. OR HER DIVERSE AND EXTRAORDINARY ACHIEVEMENTS r' EA ,'' .;e • —apu graduated with honors 1995 from Rancho Cotate High School; and M WHEREAS, Nicole recently graduated with a degree in Mechanical Engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland. There, she was honored with the U.S. Naval Academy Alumni ilkAssociation Award to midshipmen who best combine outstanding leadership, professionalism, academic distinction and athletic achievement; and HEREAS, Lieutenant Aunapu was further honored as Top Female Athlete and named GTE National Academic All-American for Women's Soccer and, as Navy's Team Captain and Trident Scholar, she closed out her career as one of the most decorated players in Patriot League history; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Aunapu currently attends graduate school at Stanford University where she is working on her Master's Degree in Thermodynamics. She has been selected for Marine Air and plans to attend flight school after graduation from Stanford; and WHEREAS, Nicole has proven her second-to-none leadership abilities time after time through an impressive list of examples ranging from Team Organizer of Toys-for-Tots Charity Drive to NCAA Woman of the Year for Maryland. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park recognizes, honors and salutes Lieutenant Nicole Aunapu for her diverse accomplishments and for the role model that she continues to set for youth. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 1999. ;(11 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK W.4n;':I:,: r•r� i. / i' K i ii 1CL3l�\ Mayor ATTEST: `\ I ,. , j. 1 City Clerk comu��ww /�� 50 ENTERPRISE DRIVE �sep r�. ROHNERT PARK,CA 94928 BANK`R 0 (707)586-4500 BUS. X 7- 0171POLLEY POLLEY (707)586-4518 FAX & MADSEN //,- /q''” RECEIVED fee, NOV 2 21999 CITY OF ,rJ� ROHNERT PARK Ur16...,_ /(611W S - PI" 61_1g----J ,'mac 14d/ - r 'Z/7----- .___/ , ,w / F7i,,,A, / f , Th ______ r /1,17 GP-- ' D v. /_1,W 119 714-0/00 ' fi .YII-- (s kA,J v i 'c-4 - ) q5-66 i5-- 31 - a 4/2 16'4" j"-t-c_ii- iC2I 9 9S'9s1 4/1 //yy IU:LU AM rident Main Paget 1 1'' rii !TRIDENT April 16, 1999 r , ' r ' T ' , F i ij „,Rti, Midn. 1/C Nicole Aunapu excels as a Trident Scholars while also serving as company commander and as captain of the women's varsity soccer team. She is one of 11 midshipmen participating in the Trident Scholar program. (USNA photo) Trident Scholars continue academic legacy By Martha Thorn Trident Feature editor ' Twelve graduating midshipmen have been engaged in independent research and study the past year. Now they are sharing the results of their efforts with their shipmates, faculty and staff. Yesterday Midns. 1/C Bryan D. Rex, Nicholas G. Osburn, James B. Solomon and James E. Coleman Jr. presented their work as part of the Trident Scholar Conference. Today Midns. 1/C John W. Waterston, Joshua T. Wood, James A. Schroeder, Corey A. Poorman, Jeremy J. Bruch, Kevin D. Simmons, Britt W. Boughey and Nicole V. Aunapu will continue the conference with a series of detailed presentations about their research. Established in 1963, the academy's Trident Scholar Program allows the most capable midshipmen from the graduating class to stretch beyond the classroom. Under the guidance of one or more faculty advisors, they embark on an academic program that focuses on research and a related thesis. These future officers submit proposals for their research projects during their junior year and are selected on the basis of those proposals and oral interviews to become Trident Scholars. This year's Trident Scholars have researched many topics. One midshipman investigated a method for detecting gearbox failure in a CH-46 helicopter, and another mathematically modeled a methane burner. Also, one firstie reviewed a proposal to create a 1960s NATO multilateral nuclear fleet and a shipmate looked at the Chesapeake Bay estuary. http://www.dcmilitary.com/navy/trident/apr16/tri_a41699.html Page 1 c Trident Main Page 4/17/99 10:20 AP "In higher education, we're becoming increasingly aware that students do not necessarily learn in the same way," said William C. Miller, the academic dean and provost. "The Trident Scholars, all in the top 10 percent academically, have a unique opportunity to learn by doing." Encouraged to take an interdisciplinary approach to their projects, they have spanned such diverse disciplines as physics, mathematics, electrical engineering and history. Trident Scholars culminate a year's worth of work with a final written report and the conference. During a dinner which will be held tomorrow, this year's Trident Scholars and those selected for next year will join their advisors, sponsors, members of the Trident committee and invited guests for a critical discussion of the entire spectrum of Naval Academy research. In assisting the Trident Scholars, Miller said faculty involvement is voluntary and in addition to their other duties. "But they gladly participate because they realize the importance of offering midshipmen this experience," he said. "Our faculty are key in the 36-year success story of the Trident Scholar program." Miller said that in the future, the Naval Academy hopes to broaden the Trident Scholar model by giving students in certain courses the chance to do hands-on research. "This is just more fun. Students who are having fun will do a better job." During Commissioning Week the most outstanding Trident Scholars will receive the Office of Naval Intelligence Harry E. Ward Prize. Editor's note: Academic Dean and Provost William C. Miller opens today's conference presentations at 9 a.m. in Rickover Hall, room 103. The last presentation begins at 3:30 p.m. To see the complete schedule, visit the website www.usna.edu/TridentProgram. [ Home I Branch I Archives I Trident ] Last updated: 4.16.99 webmaster@gazette.net http://www.dcmilitary.com/navy/trident/apr16/tri_a41699.html Page 2 of Navy's Nicole Aunapu Named Women's Soccer Patriot League Schol... 10/26/99 11 :05 PM 114 itiV y , N't jyt THEEs:NE .t,. — , a OFFICIAL W B S I i E OF NAVY ATHLE . i _ • ., ` Navy' s Nicole Aunapu j - Named Women ' s Soccer feittitt M�S StICet Patriot League ,,'t"E ' ' I~'� Scholar Athlete Of The VOttEllAtt - ; iEnOtitatal5ittitlif j Year :' IFA1ER£W.I 3 itX.. -P,�eTENNIS . >E11 1nAtMt ' BETHLEHEM, Pa. - Midshipmen senior soccer player Nicole mr•iit Aunapu (Penngrove, Calif./Rancho Cotate) was one of eight Patriot League student-athletes, including five of whom were pith s gums Ct!t3P4titr named Player of the Year in their respective sport, to be named f,:. Mks!ssi , Patriot League Scholar-Athlete for the 1998 fall athletic season 141E1l1'TRACK 1 the league office announced Friday morning. i, mt .s G'tlRI RsTrc "Nicole is a t E ' CREW perfect example .1r.� " , of what a f,4 �9tllf'F i tart cREv ,t 1, f , student-athlete K *0 -$ stands for," said ' ,,, , f4 wit .i 4 Carin Gabarra. .- i< mit. AL "She not only + ' excels on the ,ty ;s 1* l�4tt SK11 soccer field, but $ i, .. her leadership as p ;w. s, ' limim / ',!,- team captain this ;'". `, ' ' '` year was second ; ' " ` E . •: ' ,; -il to none. She's a ,y phenomenal L ,, hifo student and is a � Trident Scholar ' 1 x' Misarber of here at the ,� ,. , lid' p+ T*t al tibill ' �.�� � Academy. I m �. ,� �,�; Ih happy she was `" '' ' hN } • recognized by the . - • { Athletic Training Patriot League. . R '' She deserved it." a' Men's Gymnastics y .: , For the second Navy Sports Camps yearrow, in a Aunapu was selected as the http://www.navysports.com/Feature+Story/Womens+Soccer/1998/12/18/pat_schath121898.html Page 1 of 2 • Nvy's Nicole Aunapu Named Women's Soccer Patriot League Schol... 10/26/99 11 :05 PM Patriot League's Nicole Aunapu (Navy Sports Information Women's Soccer Photo) Scholar-Athlete. A mechanical engineering major { t at the Naval Academy who boasts a 3.87 GPA, Aunapu closed out her career as one of the most decorated women's soccer players in Patriot League history. The Navy team captain and a Trident Scholar, she became just the sixth player in league history to earn First-Team All-Patriot League honors four times. She was also named Patriot League Defensive Player of the Year for the second-consecutive season by the league's head coaches. In addition to her Patriot League honors, she earned National Soccer Coaches Association of America All-Mid-Atlantic Region honors for the fourth year in a row and was named Soccer Buzz Second-Team All-Mid-Atlantic Region. Navy's top defender, Aunapu had the responsibility of marking the opposition's top scorer and anchored the Mids' defensive unit which set a school record with 14 shutouts this season and was third in the nation E ? for shutouts per game (0.67). The Midshipmen defense ranked eighth in the nation with their 0.56 goals against average and allowed a league-low 12 goals. In order to be eligible for the scholar-athlete award, a student-athlete must be at least a sophomore and carry a cumulative grade-point average of 3.20 or better. He or she must be a starter or key reserve on his or her team. The winners are selected by a panel of athletic administrators comprised of the t ! Patriot League Executive Director, Associate Director and the seven Sports Information Directors. The recipients are eligible for '. the League's Scholar-Athlete of the Year honors awarded at the tconclusion of the academic calendar. I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I i ;,,; 4;:-,-.1 MN . iri., • ,. ....., :,.,:.. ,,,..,*„.. Nicole d Auriapu Navy Scholar Athlete Scholer:�t. a person who studies to It was one of the toughest tasks for ,. acquire knowledge.Athlete:n.a per- Aunapu,but something she's always want- .. - son who engages in athletics.A leader ed to do.It also gave her the opportunity to .• ``'*1.``" on and off the soccer field, senior improve upon her leadership skills. ,. . „ defender Nicole Aunapu is what Navy head "1 think leadership style changes through '••• 1. . Asi • women's soccer coach Carin Gabarra describes experiences you have and what you can •,• +,,,�. ry as "the epitome of what a scholar-athlete take from other people." �k4.31113/: 3 �' X should be."Aunapu's leadership on the soccer Some of her leadership skills she attrib Y field and her outstanding academic achieve- utes to Gabarra. to _ . . ments are exactly what Gabarra hopes Auna- "Coach Gabarra is one of the best coach- ,• .t pu will pass on to the underclassmen as the es I've ever had,"said Aunapu."I've learned . y team captain.Being named team captain ful- a lot of things from her that are outside of ;—..„\ . fills a goal she has strived for since her plebe soccer—her modesty,her composure,the ,-,_, year.Aunapu tells a story of a former teammate, way she handles different situations." Kate Standifer,who was a senior captain when - Aunapu typifies Gabarra's ideal scholar- _ Aunapu was a freshman. athlete. •_ "I remember one night Kate and I switched "Nicole is a dedicated role model," l jackets on the bus.I had her jacket on with three Gabarra said."She leads by example.She • i stripes and she had on my little plebe jacket and comes to practice early to improve her a we took a picture,"recalled Aunapu.I've always skills and isn't afraid to ask for help." Aunapu was elected team captain by her kept that picture with me.I thought to myself Aunapu's discipline and success on and teammates for the 1998 season. at that moment, 'One day I could have the off the field speak for themselves.The mid- three stripes and be captain and do what Kate fielder is a three-time All-Mid-Atlantic First to go into the Marines,go to flight school and has done for me.'" Team honoree and has also garnered First- eventually be a Naval Flight Officer, flying And true enough,her dedication and hard Team All-Patriot League recognition three Prowlers or F-18s. work in and out of the classroom has paid off as times. Last season, she was named Patriot Her goals and achievements have not come she guides the 1998 Navy women's soccer team. League Defensive Player of the Year. without determination and hard work,however. "Her leadership is second-to-none,"Gabar- Off the soccer field,Aunapu's resume is She was enrolled in 21 hours last fall and 22 ra said. . also quite impressive.She is a three-year Patri- hours last spring. She sacrificed a lot and Although Gabarra praises Aunapu's lead- of League honor roll student and earned found herself in a continuous schedule of ership,it's been one of the biggest challenges GTE/CoSIDA (College Sports Information studying all night,going to class and playing to date for the Penn Grove,Calif.,native. Directors of America) District II Academic soccer.But the hard work has paid dividends. "Not everyone gets a leadership challenge,' All-America status,A mechanical engineering '1 got good grades and got the Trident Aunapu said."You have to put yourself in that major,she is among the top in her class and is Scholarship,so this year is different,"she said. situation." a Trident Scholar. "I'm able to spend more time with soccer and Indeed,Aunapu jumped into a leadership In addition to her two classes this term,she more time with my team.The past few years role last year as a plebe detailer.As a plebe spends the majority of her time at the aerospace have been spent on things for me—getting detailer, Aunapu was a squad leader during lab doing her own wind tunnel research.Her good grades,getting the scholarship-but now Plebe Summer, manning her own group of study involves improving the efficiency of a I have the opportunity to help others." • freshmen. gas turbine engine.With graduation in sight.she As the 1998 Navy women's soccer captain, "It was one of the most challenging things has aspirations of going on to graduate school. Aunapu will have plenty of opportunities to Ive done since I've been here,"said Aunapu."I She has her sights set on England's presti- change the lives of people around her through often asked myself,'How do I teach them and gious Cambridge University and wants to pur- her leadership and courage on and off the soc— how do I instill the pride and discipline they sue further research into thermodynamics and cer field. Nicole Aunapu exemplifies a true should have and still get them to respect me?'" heat transfer.After graduate school she plans Navy scholar-athlete. UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY 4 ,1 NICOLE AUNAPU, 2 LT. UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS. Nicole Aunapu from Penngrove, a 1995 graduate of Rancho Cotate High School, recently graduated with honors (Top 10) from the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, where she was honored with the U.S. Naval Academy Alumni Association Award to the midshipmen who best exemplifies the ideals and traditions of the naval service and who best combines outstanding leadership, professionalism, academic distinction and athletic achievement. Nicole was awarded the honor of Top Female Athlete and was named GTE National Academic All-American for Women's Soccer. As Navy's Team Captain she closed out her career as one of the most decorated players in the Patriot League history. Nicole, a Trident Scholar, graduated with a degree in Mechanical Engineering. She has been selected for Marine Air. Before starting flight school she will attend graduate school at Stanford University. Aunapu Named 1998-99 Patriot League Female Scholar-Athlete of the... 6/7/99 2:36 PM i' THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF NAVY ATHLE .... _... . . . . i 11111=111111111 ' ; Aunapu Named 1998-99 1 ,., last - Patriot League Female '. ti Scholar-Athlete Hof the 1 1i ,ij �8 . Year j il+l+}r11-t , r 1 yj "a''"f BETHLEHEM,Pa. -- Navy women's soccer standout Nicole ` 11it"�t; - { Aunapu(Penngrove, Calif./Rancho Cotate)added to her lengthy trrel;"', ` 4a list of accomplishments for the 1998-99 season,as she garnered ,' rerts4 tr.ii`i'4 1998-99 Patriot League Female Scholar-Athlete-of-the-Year ta. ++t'►-+ ' recognition Thursday morning. IAunapu,who last ball was selected as the Patriot League rtea 1 t` Women's Soccer Scholar-Athlete of the Year,was named to the ,=''"ti p GTE Academic All-America Women's Fall/Winter At-Large First i ``i '�'', Team as selected by the College Sports Information Directors of 4dir`' r t 1 America(CoSIDA)in April. Tril .v Aunapu,a mechanical engineering major and a Trident Scholar, L '' u boasted a 3.86 grade-point average and ranked amongthe top10 • ll •=' -4 in her graduation class. In addition to earning national Acadeic ( i` 11'11 i All-America honors,she was also named Second-Team NSCAA .,- „_ ,,,, (National Soccer Coaches Association of America) If tot i Scholar-Athlete All-America in January. Not only was she a top student at the Naval Academy,Aunapu is `"4 ' ,,r-TrN; I was also one of the top women's soccer players in the region, i t , I , and closed out her career as one of the most decorated players in ' k ''�'f N �yx,,.r ,,,1a1 i P striot League history. Navy's team captain,she became just the I i sixth player in league history to garner First-Team All-Patriot League honors four times. She was also named Patriot League 41"61"4 f ' Defensive Player of the Year for the second-consecutive season ' *1Ni C." by the league's head coaches. In addition to her Patriot League 1 honors,she earned NSCAA All-Mid-Atlantic Region honors for i. the fourth year in a row and was named Soccer Buzz i Athletic Trailing I Second-Team All-Mid-Atlantic Region. Navy's top defender, i ; Aunapu had the responsibility of marking the opposition's lop tvicn's Oyrrutastics 1 scorer and anchored the Mids'defensive unit which set a school record with 14 shutouts this season and was third in the nation I Navy Sports Caitlin1 for shutouts per game(0.67).The Midshipmen defense ranked eighth in the nation with their 0.56 goals against average and allowed a league-low 12 goals. I ' She also received the Vice Admiral William P.Lawrence Sword 1 for Women,presented to that woman of the graduating class who I has personally excelled in women's athletics during her years of i varsity competition at the Academy. She,too, was honored with j . the U.S. Naval Academy Alumni Association Award,presented to the midshipmen who best exemplifies the ideals and traditions • • of the naval service and who best combines outstanding leadership, professionalism,academic distinction and athletic i achievement.Aunapu will continue her academic endeavors i ; attending graduate school at Stanford University next fall. i j • • C copyright 1998 The Total College Sports Network,llost Communications,and Total I vSports. r i1 All rights reserved world wide. __ No portion of this site may be reproduced or duplicated without the express written permission. il�ll f�� Tile Total College Sports Network,'lost Communications.and Total Sports take no responsibility for any third-party material appearing in any section of this site. . Rob Blanck,9/3/99 6:33 AM,Fwd: Navy's Aunapu Named '99 Maryland Woman 3 Navy's Aunapu Among the 1999 NCAA Woman of the Year State Winners INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. - Former Navy women's soccer standout Nicole Aunapu was among the 51 state-level winners (including the District of Columbia) of the 1999 Woman of the Year Award announced Thursday afternoon by the NCAA. The NCAA Woman of the Year Award honors outstanding female student-athletes from NCAA institutions who have excelled in the collegiate environment beyond their athletic pursuits with academic achievements and community involvement. "To be completely honest, I was shocked and excited all at once," said Aunapu, who is currently attending graduate school at Stanford. "To be among the state of Maryland's top athletes was an honor, but winning such an award is really humbling." The 51 state winners were chosen from more than 300 nominations and break down to 28 student-athletes from Division I, 12 student-athletes from Division II and 11 student-athletes from Division II. The field of 51 will be narrowed down to 10 finalists later this month and the NCAA Committee on Women's Athletics will select the NCAA Woman of the Year from among the finalists. Last spring, Aunapu became Navy's first female student-athlete to earn GTE Academic All-America recognition as presented by the College Sports Information Directors of America (CoSIDA) since the Naval Academy elevated its women's programs to Division I status. In addition to her national academic recognition, she was also named the Patriot League's Women's Soccer Scholar-Athlete of the Year for the second year in a row. Aunapu closed out her career last fall as one of the most decorated women's soccer players in Patriot League history. Navy's team captain and a Trident Scholar, she became just the sixth player in league history to garner First-Team All-Patriot League honors four times. She was also named Patriot League Defensive Player of the Year for the second-consecutive season by the league's head coaches. In addition to her Patriot League honors, she earned NSCAA All-Mid-Atlantic Region honors for the fourth year in a row and was named Soccer Buzz Second-Team All-Mi! d-Atlantic Region. Navy's top defender, Aunapu had the responsibility of marking the opposition's top scorer and anchored the Mids' defensive unit which set a school record with 14 shutouts this season and was third in the nation for shutouts per game (0.67). The Midshipmen defense ranked eighth in the nation with their 0.56 goals against average and allowed a league-low 12 goals. All 51 state winners have been be invited to the 1999 NCAA Woman of the Year Awards Dinner October 24 in Indianapolis, Ind., where the NCAA Woman of the Year winner will be announced. "It'll be a great experience to be around so many talented student-athletes in Indianapolis at the awards banquet," said Aunapu. "I really Printed for Howard and Vicki Aunapu <fadmoo@sonic.net> 3 • Rob Blanck,9/3/99 6:33 AM,Fwd: Navy's Aunapu Named '99 Maryland Woman 4 am honored and thrilled to be in the company of all the student-athletes recognized." G-o N-a-v-y Stacie Michaud U.S. Naval Academy Asst. Sports Information Director Ph. (410) 293-4517, ext. 136 (410) 280-0768-home Fax (410) 269-6779 Printed for Howard and Vicki Aunapu <fadmoo@sonic.net> 4 NICOLE VICTORIA AUNAPU Distinguished Midshipmen Graduate - Top Ten Immediate Scholarships To Civilian Universities Mechanical Engineering Stanford University Marine Corps Burke Program /Graduate Education Program Marine Corps Special Education Program & Advanced Degree Program Trident Scholar 1998-1999 Independent Research Project Leadership and Professional Award-Plaque The National Society, United States Daughters of 1812 Midshipmen of the graduation class who stands highest in Order of Merit among those to be commissioned in the U.S. Marine Corps. Academic Award-Watch National Society United States Daughters of 1812 Midshipmen of the graduating class who achieves the greatest increase in cumulative quality point rating while a general engineering major among those completing a general engineering major. Special Awards Vice Admiral William P Lawrence Sword for Women Presented by the Naval Academy Athletic Assoc. to that woman of the graduating class who is considered by the Association's Athletic Council to have personally excelled in women's athletics during her years of varsity competition. U. S. Naval Academy Alumni Association Award A check for $2,000 to the Midshipmen who bests exemplifies the ideals and traditions of the naval service and who best combines outstanding leadership, professionalism, academic -distinction and athletic achievement. NICOLE AUNAPU NICOLE AUNAPU named the 1999 NCAA WOMEN OF THE YEAR for Maryland. The most prestigious award one can receive as an amateur athlete. Nicole will also be featured on the side of about 7 City of Annapolis buses. The buses feature Navy Athletics with a larger than life size picture of Nicole jumping to head a ball. (along with David Robinson, Roger Staubach, and Vanessa Melofchik (women's bball, '98)). The AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS awarded NICOLE AUNAPU first place for Regional, Best Technical and Oral Presentation. List honors or awards earned since you enrolled in college: Captain of the Women's Varsity Soccer Team All-tournament team-Layfatte Tournament (Soccer) Two time second place in the Patriot League (Soccer) Three time recipient of All-Regional Mid Atlantic Third Team Honors (Soccer) All-Regional Mid Atlantic Second Team Honors (Soccer) Four time recipient of First Team All-Patriot League Honors (Soccer) Two time recipient of Defensive Player of the Year- Patriot League (Soccer) Two time Patriot League Soccer Scholar Athlete of the Year (Soccer) Patriot League Scholar Athlete of the Yeaqr Most Valuable Player Navy Women's Varsity soccer (Soccer) Named four times to the Patriot League Fall Academic Honor Roll (Soccer) Named two times to the Soccer Buzz All Mid-Atlantic Regional Second Team (Soccer) Selected to GTE Academic All-American Women's District II Fall/Winter First Team (Soccer) Selected to the GTE Academic All-America First Team Selected to be featured on Elite Feet-Soccer Buzz Four time recipient of Varsity Letter - Women's Soccer Recipient of N star for beating army in soccer 11 th Company Plebe of the Month 2nd Battalion Plebe of the Month Plebe 11 th Company Commander Summer Seminar Squad Leader Outstanding Squad Leader award - summer seminar First in platoon drill Regimental Sergeant Major - summer seminar Recipient of command qualification pin Recipient of summer seminar pin Recipient of plebe detail pin Seven time honoree of the Superintendent List } • i I l Chosen to be a two time member of the Naval Academy's Rhodes/Marshall Preparation Program Plebe Detail Squad Leader 6th Company Midshipman of the quarter 6th Company First Sergeant 6th Company Commander Winner of Trident Scholarship for Academic Year 1998-1999 Toys-For-Tots Charity Drive - Captain/Team Organizer Giving from the Heart of the Brigade Charity Drive Giving Tree Adopt a Highway CPR Course Instructor Pi Tau Sigma - Vice President. Golden Key National Honor Society Tau Beta Pi Phi Kappa Phi Semper Fi Society Scuba Club Company Log representative Graduation Awards Distinguished Midshipmen Graduate - Top Ten Top Female Athelete Top Midshipmen Marine that graduated highest in the class Academic All-America Award NCAA Woman of the Year - Maryland 4 ' } CITY OF ROHNERT PARK RESOL. NO. 99-252 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Department: 3410-6101 ***City Clerk Use Only*** Meeting Date Held Until Submitted By: Angie Smith 12/14/99 Purchasing Assistant II Item No. Agenda Title: Award of Contract for Date of Action: Tree Maintenance and Pruning Work Deadline Date for Council Action: Requested Council Action: Pass Resolution Awarding the Contract for Tree Maintenance and Pruning Work. Summary: The following bids were received for Tree Maintenance and Pruning Work: Contractor Name Cost Per Hour/Man Stump Grinding VWest Coast Arborists, Inc $43.00 $75.00 Anaheim, California Atlas Tree Surgery $48.00 $48.00/$65.00 Santa Rosa, California Sandborn Tree Service $50.00 $70.00/$90.00 Sebastopol, California Batt's Tip Top Service $52.00 $100.00 Santa Rosa, California Due to the fact that the lowest bidder, West Coast Arborists, is located in Southern California, staff requested a meeting in Rohnert Park with their representatives. The meeting was held on November 30, 1999. West Coast Arborists has contracts with 70 municipalities in California, including two in Northern California, the City of Sacramento and the City of Monterey. Their presentation was professional, and the City's Arborist followed up with a tour of the City's trees. Therefore, it is staffs recommendation to Award the Contract for Tree Maintenance and Pruning Work to lowest most responsible bidder, West Coast Arborists of Anaheim, California. CIT MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: onsent Item ( )Regular Item pproval ( )Public Hearing Require ( ) of Recommended ( ) Submitted with Comment ( )Policy Deter nation by Council 9 () City Com nts: J , I >yrti City Mana is Signature: Date: ?IffCity Clerk Use Only Council Action (If Other than Requested) Vote: RESOLUTION NO. 99-252 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR TREE MAINTENANCE AND PRUNING WORK WHEREAS, proposals were solicited by the City Council for Tree Maintenance and Pruning Work; and WHEREAS, four proposals were received by the City Manager and reviewed with the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Rohnert Park hereby award the contract for the aforementioned Tree Maintenance and Pruning Work to the lowest most responsible bidders, compatibility and other factors considered, to wit: Contractor Name Cost Per Hour/Man Stump Grinding Cost West Coast Arborists, Inc. $43.00 $75.00 Anaheim, California BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to handle all details and execute any documents relative to said contracts. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 1999. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk CITY OF ROHNERT PARK RESOL. NO. 99-253 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Department: Public Safety ***City Clerk Use Only*** Youth& Family Services Meeting Date Held Until Submitted By: Kathy Vander Vennet Dec. 14, 1999 Diversion Counselor Item No. Agenda Title: Contract with University of San Francisco Date of Action: Deadline Date for: Council Action: Requested Council Action: Adopt resolution authorizing and approving contract agreement with University of San Francisco for services provided to Youth and Family Services and naming the City Manager as executor of this agreement. Summary: For the past 15 years, Youth and Family Services has worked collaboratively with the University of San Francisco's School of Education as a field experience for students pursuing a Master's degree in this program. Pursuant to that end, the university and this agency have had a contract on file. With the retirement of Dr. James Park, a new contract was necessary. These `trainees" and "interns" provide a valuable service to the youth and families or our community providing free counseling to them. It is a "win-win" situation as the families receive the help they have asked for and the students are able to learn first hand by working with clients. CITY M AGER'S RECOMMENDATION: onsent Item () Regular Time . 'pproval ( )Pub is earing Required ()Not Recommended - `'ubmitted with Comment --�� [AAA e c� ��el II 4eC0341v"(4.de.r e �''v . () Policy Determination by Council a ( )City Comments: g City Manager's Signature: der' Date: 2 jh-c:lshellslcouncil agenda transmittal City Clerk Use Only Council Action Vote: RESOLUTION NO. 99-253 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO FOR MFCC TRAINEESHIP AGENCY CONTRACT BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rohnert Park that that MFCC (Marriage, Family, and Child Counselling) Traineeship Agency Contract Agreement by and between the University of San Francisco, an educational institution, and the City of Rohnert Park, a municipal corporation, be and the same is hereby accepted and approved for certain services provided to Youth and Family Services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute same for and on behalf of the City of Rohnert Park. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 1999. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Counseling Psychology Program School of Education UNIVERSITY of 213c Fulton Street SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco.CA 94117-1080 TEL 415 422-6868 MFCC TRAINEESHIP AGENCY CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF EDUCATION COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY MARRIAGE, FAMILY, AND CHILD COUNSELING PROGRAM AND THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 199 _, by and between the UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, hereinafter called the "University" and hereinafter called the "Agency." WITNESSETH: The University has approved a Counseling Program with emphasis in Marriage, Family, & Child Counseling which requires field experience and the use of the Agency's facilities for required learning experiences which may be obtained by participating in the program and providing services to and for the Agency in a manner which is mutually beneficial to students and the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, and stipulations hereinafter expressed and in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties hereto agree as follows: THE AGENCY SHALL: A. Permit each student who is designated by the University pursuant to paragraph II.A below to receive counseling with emphasis in Marriage and Family Therapy oriented field experience at the Agency, assign each student to a qualified Field Supervisor who meets the University's requirements (See Appendix 1); and shall furnish and permit students and University instructors free access to appropriate Agency facilities for such field experience. B. The Agency agrees to allocate clinical experience equally among students from USF and other Universities. The Agency further agrees that it will ensure that USF students are afforded the quality clinical experiences necessary for advancement in the individual student's program and significant professional growth. No preferential treatment shall be given to any student which would deny USF students the same qualitative and quantitative clinical experience. 3,98 usf/mfcc traineeship form page 1 Jesuit Education Since 1855 C. Maintain the Agency facilities used for the field experience in such a manner that said facilities shall be available to the students and Traineeship course instructor when needed. This includes a conference-type space suitable for small groups as may be needed, and as may be available. D. Assure that Agency staff is adequate in number and quality to insure student clinical training and continuous management of the student program in cooperation with the University. E. Have the right, after consultation with the University, to refuse to accept for further field experience any of the University's students who in the Agency's judgment are not participating satisfactorily in said program. F. Notify the University's Field Consultant and Traineeship course instructors, in advance, of any change in the Agency's personnel appointments which may affect the student field experience program. G. Have sole responsibility for patient/client care and student clinical training. H. Comply with the Student Traineeship Requirements for USF Students in the Marriage, Family and Child Counseling Program (see Appendix 1). I. Inform Agency Supervisors assigned to USF Students (trainees) of the provisions of this MFCC Traineeship Agency Contract and to monitor Agency Supervisors' compliance with this contract. J. Provide a 12-month fieldwork experience as part of the student trainee's USF Traineeship requirement. II. THE UNIVERSITY SHALL: A. Designate the students who are enrolled in the Counseling Program with emphasis in Marriage, Family, and Child Counseling of the University, to be assigned for field experience at the Agency, in such numbers as are mutually agreed to by both parties. Specific terms of the field experience shall be indicated by a specific Student Traineeship Contract(see Appendix 3) for each student. B. Be responsible only for academic instruction and shall not supervise clinical care. C. Require every student to conform to all applicable Agency and University policies, procedures, regulations, requirements and restrictions specified by representatives of the University and Agency. (Attach any such Agency policies, procedures, regulations, requirements, and restrictions.) D. In consultation and coordination with the Agency's representatives, plan for the field experience to be provided to students under this agreement. E. In consultation and coordination with the Agency's administrative staff arrange for periodic conferences between appropriate representatives of the University and Agency to evaluate the Traineeship/fieldwork program provided under this Agreement. usf/mfcc traineeship form page 2 F. Assign a faculty member as a Traineeship course instructor responsible for monitoring the professional development and performance of students enrolled in the Counseling Program. G. Maintain records on individual students to monitor the professional development and performance of students enrolled in the Counseling Program. H. Comply with the Student Traineeship Requirements (see Appendix 1). III. FINANCIAL PROVISIONS A. Hold Harmless and Indemnification Agency and University agree to protect, hold harmless, indemnify and defend each other(including its officers, officials, employees, students and volunteers) from any and all liability (including reasonable attorneys fees) resulting from injury to or death sustained by any person (including officers, officials, employees, students and volunteers) or damage to property of any kind, which is in any way connected with the performance of this agreement, except that said hold harmless and indemnification shall not be applicable to liability arising from the sole negligence or the sole willful misconduct of the Agency or the University. B. Agency and University Insurance Agency and University agree to each keep in full force and effect, during the term of this Agreement, insurance to meet their respective obligations and liabilities under this Agreement and such insurance shall include but not be limited to the following: Commercial General Liability and Auto Liability with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $3,000,000 in the aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, endorsed to name the other party to the contract as additional insured. Medical Professional Liability with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $3,000,000 in the aggregate. Workers' Compensation coverage with statutory limits, and Employers Liability coverage with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $3,000,000 in the aggregate. Each insurance policy required above shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, or canceled by either party, except after sixty (60) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the other party to the contract. Agency and University shall each cause to be issued to the other evidence of such insurance prior to the commencement of the Agreement and annually thereafter. Please attach evidence of insurance policy to contract. usf/mfcc traineeship form page 3 C. STUDENT INSURANCE Student participants shall procure and maintain at their own expense during the term of the field experience: Professional Liability insurance to a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $3,000,000 in the aggregate. Agency shall be responsible for obtaining evidence of such insurance and providing University a copy of such evidence. Accident/Illness insurance. University shall be responsible for obtaining evidence of such insurance and providing Agency a copy of such evidence. D. STUDENT STATUS. Under this Agreement, volunteer students shall not be entitled to any monetary remuneration or compensation from either the Agency or the University for services performed by them within the course of the field experience program. Students who do receive compensation must do so with an awareness of and in compliance with the Board of Behavioral Sciences laws and regulations pertaining to payment of trainees. Students are not employees of either the Agency or University, regardless of the nature and extent of the acts performed by the students. The payment of compensation does not in itself create an employee/employer relationship between the student and either the Agency or the University. Therefore, neither the Agency nor the University assumes any liability under any law on account of any act of any student performing, receiving training or traveling pursuant to this agreement. E. STATUS OF UNIVERSITY AND AGENCY. It is expressly understood and agreed that this agreement is not intended and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association between the University, and Agency, both, rather it is an agreement by and between independent contractors, these being University and Agency. IV. DISPUTES A. In the event that a dispute occurs between parties with regard to the rights or duties created by this Agreement, or in the event of a breach of this agreement by either party, the parties hereto agree to meet and confer in good faith in an effort to resolve the dispute or issue. In the event that the parties are not able to informally resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days after the dispute has arisen, the parties agree to decide whether to attempt to settle the dispute through arbitration or litigation. In order to send a dispute to arbitration, both parties must agree in writing that this is their chosen method of resolving the dispute in question. usf/mfcc traineeship form page 4 V. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Termination. Termination of this agreement shall be effective as of the date first written above and shall continue in effect for an indefinite period, subject to termination by either party with a thirty (30) day written notice. This Agreement may at any time be altered, changed or amended by mutual agreement of the parties in writing. B. Applicable Law. The terms and conditions of this agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. C. Severability. In the event that any term or provision of this agreement shall to any extent be held by a court of proper jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the remainder of this agreement shall not be affected thereby, and the remaining terms and provisions shall, to the extent permitted by law, be deemed amended and given such interpretation as to achieve the intent of this agreement. D. Confidentiality. Both parties shall protect the confidentiality of each others records and information, and shall not disclose confidential information without the prior written consent of the other party. The University agrees to comply with Agency policy and procedure related to patient confidentiality. E. Term of Agreement. This agreement shall commence on 199 and shall be automatically renewed annually, except that it may be terminated by either party after giving the other party thirty (30) days advance written notice without cause; provided further, however, that any such termination by the Agency shall not be effective, at the election of the University, as to any student who at the date of mailing of the notice by the Agency was participating in the program until the student has completed the program for the then current academic year. F. "Agency" is a (check one): VGovernment entity Non-profit and Charitable Corporation (possess copy of 501(c)(3) tax exempt letter from IRS) School, College, or University Licensed Health Facility as defined by Health and Safety Code Sections 1250, 1250.2, and 1250.3 (possess copy of license from Department of Health Services) usf/mfcc traineeship form page 5 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by and on behalf of the parties hereto, the day and year first above written. UNIVERSITY: AGENCY: (print: name, address, phone) UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117-1080 Phone # By: By: Provost Date Agency Director* Date * please check information required in 2 places on previous page Dean, School of Education Date Coordinator, Date USF/MFCC Program Mailing Address: MFCC Program USF School of Education 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco CA 94117-1.080. usf/mfcc traineeship form page 6 VanderVennet, Kathy From: Strauss, Betsy Sent: Thursday, September 23, 1999 3:17 PM To: VanderVennet, Kathy Subject: Contract with USF Hi Kathy. Here are my suggestions on the contract with USF: 1. Change Paragraph IG to read: "Have sole responsibility for supervision of patient/client care and student clinical training." 2. Paragraph IIIA: Mutual Hold Harmless and Indemnification Agency and University agree that Agency shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless University, its officers and personnel, from any and all claims for injuries or damage to persons or property which result from the negligent or willful acts or omissions of Agency, or its officers, agents and/or personnel. Agency and University further agree that University shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Agency, its officers, members, and personnel, from any and all claims for injuries or damages to persons and/or property which result from the negligent or willful acts or omissions of Agency, or its officers, agents and/or personnel. 3. Add new Paragraph IIIB: Comparative Negligence In the event of the concurrent negligence of the Agency, its officers, members, agents and/or personnel, and University, its officers, agents and/or personnel, then the liability for any and all claims for injuries or damages to persons and/or property which arise out of this Agreement shall be apportioned under the established California theory of comparative negligence and as it may be modified. 4. Change Paragraph IIIB to IIIC: Agency and University Insurance The City does not maintain Medical Professional Liability Insurance. In addition, the City is a member of the Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund, a joint powers agency, created pursuant to Government Code § 6500. The City is self-insured to $5,000, and is covered by the REMIF self-insured limit to $500,000 per occurrence. Excess coverage to $14,500,000 in excess of$500,000 per occurrence (depending upon the type of occurrence and subject to specified sublimits or exclusions) is provided through self-insurance and re-insurance as a member of the California Joint Powers Rish Management Authority. Therefore, I would suggest informing the University that(a) the City does not carry Medical Professional Liability Insurance; and (b)the City satisfies the other insurance requirements in Paragraph IIIC through self-insurance through its membership in the Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund and through self-insurance and re-insurance through REMIF'S membership in the California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority. I hope this is clear. Please let me know if you have any questions. • •t II CITY OF ROHNERT PARK RESOL. NO. 99-254 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Department: Engineering Division City Clerk Use Only Meeting Date Held Until Submitted By: Joseph Gaffney 12/14/99 _/ /_ City Engineer Agenda Item No. Agenda Item No. Agenda Title: Resolution Approving Date of Council Action: _/_/_ Application for Federal Transportation Funds Deadline Date for Council Action: / / Summary: The City has applied for Federal transportation funds under the TEA-21 legislation. The funds will provide $400,000 toward the overlay and reconstruction of various city streets. The City will be required to commit $60,000 in local matching funds. When the funding becomes available, construction can be completed in 2001. CI MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: ›eionsent Item () Regular Item Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required ( of Recommended () Submitted with Comment () Policy Determination by Council () City Comments: ti City Manager's Signature: Of ,1 � , Al Date: q 1 e' (Cit�• Clerk Use Only) Council Action (If Other than Requested) Vote: RESOLUTION NO. 99 - 254 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE APPLICATIONS FOR FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUNDING FOR OVERLAYS-2000 AND COMMITTING THE NECESSARY LOCAL MATCHING FUNDS WHEREAS, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21s`Century(TEA 21) (Public Law 105-178, June 9. 1998) and the TEA 21 Restoration Act(Public Law 105-206, July 22, 1998)continue the Surface Transportation Program(23 U.S.C. s 133)and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) (23 U.S.C. s 149); and WHEREAS,pursuant to TEA 21, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, eligible project sponsors wishing to receive Surface Transportation Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program grants for a project shall submit applications first with the appropriate metropolitan transportation planning organization (MPO),for review and inclusion in the MPO's Transportation Improvement Program(TIP); and WHEREAS,the Metropolitan Transportation Commission(MTC)is the MPO for the San Francisco Bay region; and WHEREAS,the City of Rohnert Park is an eligible project sponsor for Surface Transportation Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funds;and WHEREAS,the City of Rohnert Park wishes to submit a grant application to MTC for funds from the Surface Transportation Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program in fiscal year 1999/00 for the following project: OVERLAYS-2000 WHEREAS,MTC requires as part of the applications, a resolution stating the following: 1) the commitment of necessary local matching funds of at least 11.5%; and 2) that the sponsor understands that the Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funding is fixed at the programmed amount. and therefore any cost increases cannot be expected to be funded with Surface Transportation Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funds; and 3) the assurance of the sponsor to complete the projects as described in the application, and if approved, as programmed in MTC's TIP. 4) that the sponsor understands that funds must be obligated by September 30, 2001,or the project may be removed from the program. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to execute and file applications for funding under the Surface Transportation Program or the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program of TEA 21 in the amount of$400,000 for Overlays-2000; and Resolution No. 99-254 (Page 2 of 2) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Rohnert Park.by adopting this resolution does hereby state that: 1) The City of Rohnert Park will provide$60,000(15.00%)in local matching funds; and 2) The City of Rohnert Park understands that the Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funding for the project is fixed at$400,000, and that any cost increases must be funded by the City of Rohnert Park from local matching funds, and that the City of Rohnert Park does not expect any cost increases to be funded with Surface Transportation Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funds: and 3) The Overlays-2000 project will be built as described in this resolution and, if approved. as programmed in Metropolitan Transportation Commission(MTC)Transportation Improvement Program(TIP). 4) The program funds are expected to be obligated by September 30, 2001. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED.that a copy of this resolution will be transmitted to the MTC in conjunction with the filing of the application; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that the MTC is requested to support the application for the projects described in the resolution and to program the projects. if approved.in MTC's TIP. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 1999. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk '1 RESOLUTION NO. 99-255 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ENDORSING THE ROHNERT PARK BOYS' AND GIRLS' CLUB COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the Boys' and Girls' Club of Rohnert Park was initiated to assist young people in our community by providing afterschool and summer activities to help keep youth off the streets; and WHEREAS, the vast majority of these youth come from low income families; and WHEREAS, application was in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000), and seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) was received for the past fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the Sonoma County Community Development Commission (SCCDC) is taking applications for grants for FY 1999-2000 and the Boys' & Girls' Club is applying for such a grant in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000), which will be used to help provide services; and WHEREAS, one of the requirements of applying for a grant from SCCDC is endorsement from the communities in which the grantee serves. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it commends the Boys' and Girls' Club for its diligent work in helping youth from predominately low income families. • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park that it wholeheartedly endorses application by the Boys' and Girls' Club to SCCDC for the requested $ o o,5 in grant funds. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 1999. ATTEST: CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Deputy City Clerk Mayor BOYS &GIRLS CLUB of Rohnert Park Mailing Address P.O. Box 2426 Rohnert Park, CA 94927 9 December 1999 Club Site 435 Southwest Blvd. Rohnert Park, CA (707) 795-0139 (707) 795-0228 FAX Joe Netter. City Manager City Hall 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park. CA 94928 Dear Mr. Netter. This letter is to clarify what I need from the City Council. I am submitting a grant for $15,000 to the Sonoma County Community Development Commission for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. These funds will be used to cover 10% of the total program costs for our Intervention Programs for Lower- Income Youth. These programs include: the "Power Hour" homework room, computer lab, individual tutoring, reading program, sports programs, art programs. game room. and character and leadership development. CDBG has been a lona time supporter of the Boys & Girls Club of Rohnert Park. This year we are operating with a CDBG contract for $7,500. I need a resolution from the City Council sayinc that the Boys & Girls Club provides a prioritized service in the community and that the Council supports the application for funding to CDBG. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you for your continued work for the Club. Sinc ely�. ?G& Miclne e ocha Executive Director I. RESOLUTION NO. 99-256 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING FUNDING FOR CERTAIN RENNOVATIONS AT THE CITY'S PAL BUILDING BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rohnert Park that funding in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), is approved for certain renovations to the City owned PAL Building. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to administer approval of said funding for and on behalf of the City of Rohnert Park. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 14`h day of December, 1999. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk • ' s 1��E'`'� Council: X Date By 'i`. R Miscellaneous �t r; z '� / ) r Communications . `/t Agenda J � !J• { CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Copy to: se. 1;,' RECREATION DEPARTMENT Copy to: MEMORANDUMkb _ `)'X o'`) j CI\ OC)- f OCTOBER 25, 1999 /40y n'pF NFtiT p, TO: JOE NETTER, CITY MANAGER FROM: TIM BARRY, RECREATION DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PAL BUILDING PROGRAM PROPOSAL ' Since my September 3rd memo to you describing program concepts and costs for the PAL Building, I asked John Hartnett and Amanda Houseman to meet with teens at the site, get oc their input, and mi y_our concept on the facility, since we don't have the n dmg for such complete renovations of the building. They did this, and formulated a program proposal in the form of the attached report. In addition, I met on site with Gary Tatman, and have received a preliminary estimate of less rigorous renovation costs from Dales Property Service, and included it in this report. Remodeling Costs: The new preliminary cost estimate for minimum renovat" including bathroom reconstruction, floor buffing and heating modifications $ 25,000 The floor will remain a buffed cement, and no ceiling tiles will be installed. Students will do the clean up, painting and decorating. They will decide on elements of the interior environment, with appropriate guidance by a Department staff liaison. Program Costs: The goal of this program is to provide positive activities for sigh school aged youth (although middle school youth could be served with additional funding and schedufing'times) in a desirable, self-managed environment. There will be an advisory group of teens that will administer the program, coordinate student volunteers and be assisted by paid staff to implement and supervise activities. We can provide different levels of service for different annual costs: r, r r {1\' Option Schedule Staffing Supplies Total `J \_O,"pt on A: Drop-ii>` ` nbnth prog. M-W-F $ 3,978 $ 600 $ 4,578 3-6 p.m. Drop-in 1 yr. prog. Same $ 7,956 $ 1,200 $ 9,156 • • Option Schedule Staffing Supplies Total Option B: ✓ C•Spec. Events..) 6 month prog. 2 per mo. $ 2,448 $ 300 7$ 2,748 24 S . � penis y 1 yr rog. Same $ 4,896 $ 600 -'$ 5,496 ".` Start-Up Costs: In addition, there will be 1st year costs of$ 7,050 in equipment such as tables, chairs, pool and ping pong tables, furniture, refrigerator, karioke machine, etc. Most of these items would be purchased used, and some could be donated to reduce the cost. Operating Costs: Lastly, there will be operating costs for the building. Unfortunately, we don't have any data on annual operating costs when PAL ran it, and our schedule of use would probably be quite different than when they had the building. I estimate janitorial and utilities to be $ 7,000 for a year. Revenues: We anticipate $ 5,160 in revenue for 6 months, and $ 10,320 in revenues for a 1 yr. program. Recommendation: Please review the attached material. We recommend going forward with an allocation of$ 25,000 for renovations, and funding for programming at whatever level with which you are comfortable. The highest service level proposed would constitute a three-day per week drop-in program for high school students plus two special events per month. The cost for this would be $ 17,876 for the remainder of this fiscal year (6 months), including one time start up equipment costs of$ 7,050 and maintenance costs,to be offset by $ 5,160 in revenues. The cost of the following year's program would be $ 21,652 for f/y 00-01, to be offset by $10,320 in revenues. To test the waters more slowly, a less expensive approach would be the two special events per month concept only, which would cut programming costs nearly in half. Please give me a call if you have any questions. • TB/s attachment cc: John Hartnett, Recreation Services Manager Amanda Houseman,Recreation Coordinator Bill Stephens,Public Works Manager I ' / G ,e5o ; Council: -. Date u' ()/(`t/f / �XP�'` Miscellaneous ��r ' "9 Communications 111111111111. /We'o J �' �I CITY OF ROHNERT P A ' A,ends I i q ♦• RECREATION DEPARTME 'Copy to: ` tiQ cop to: 1111111111.m_ MEMORANDUM `o NOVEMBER 24, 1999 TO: JOE NETTER, CITY MANAGER FROM: TIM BARRY, RECREATION DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PAL BUILDING PROGRAM PROPOSAL On Thursday, November 18, John Hartnett, Amanda Houseman, Jennifer Kruska and I met at the PAL building with several members of the "Youth of the Year" group and a few teen representatives from the original core group to discuss the Teen Center proposal, as outlined in the report reviewed by Council on November 9. Staff provided a review on the background of the building and how it might be used to serve teens on a temporary basis. The group was given a tour of the facility and discussion centered around how the teens might want to design the lay out to best serve their needs for a weekday drop-in and weekend event program. All essential elements of the preliminary proposal were shared with the group including: start-up budget; revenue goals; program elements; staff supervision; teen volunteers; policies and procedures and a planning committee. The teen group was very supportive of the concept and understood that this idea was a key element in filling the needs of local youth, based on the results of the "Youth Summit". They clearly understood that this program will need to be driven by what they desire in the way of programs. They will need to take ownership of the program and develop committees, design rules and regulations and provide on-going volunteer support, supplemented by recreation staff supervision. In addition, they will need to comply with all City policies and procedures. ,In terms of initiating a program, it was explained that monies will need to be approved by the Council and the first order of business will be to install bathrooms and sand the cement floor. During the next three months, a youth committee and staff could meet to develop sub-committees to plan and set up all the necessary elements to get the program off the ground. It was suggested that late February or early March might work as a target date to open the new Teen Center. Five of the teens present volunteered to be on the youth committee. The Youth of the Year members indicated that they would spread the word among their peers to encourage others to step forth as volunteers. Staff are very excited about the possibility of initiating this program. We feel it will serve as a good pilot project to "test the waters" in terms of serving the youth of our community, and with their help, it will certainly do just that. TB/JH/j h CITY OF ROHNERT PARK♦6750 Commerce Blvd.♦Rohnert Park, Ca. 94928♦Phone 588-2226♦FAX 588-2263 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK City Clerk Use Only Council Action Vote: DIRECTION to PROCEED per staff recommendation 11/15/99 ATTN: Tim Barry,Recreation Director RE: PAL BUILDING PROGRAM PROPOSAL for a DROP IN TEEN LOCATION The City Council indicated direction to proceed with the above item at its meeting of November 9, 1999, as recommended by staff, regarding the concept of using the PAL building as a drop in teen location (staff report attached). This included agreement for Recreation Director Barry & designated staff, along with City Manager Netter and Councilmember Mackenzie, to meet with the current High School Youth of the Year Program Representatives for further review of this proposal. Considerations are to include use of this location for a 1-year drop in teen program and emphasis stressed on the sense of ownership and responsibility of the Youth. Thank you. Judy Hau 1.ec.v�eputy City Clerk cc: Troy Dettling,Admin.Assist.to the City Manager - FOR CALENDAR SCHEDULING Michael Harrow,Finance Director John Hartnett,Recreation Services Manager Amanda Housman,Recreation Coordinator Bill Stephens, Public Works Manager FILE-PAL Building Proposals. FILE-Future Council Agenda Items,when available FILE-City Mgr's Council Agenda Chron File jh/c:council agenda action lr'e: J!v i CITY OF ROHNERT PARK COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Department: Engineering City Clerk Use Only Meeting Date Held Until Submitted By: Joseph Gaffney 12/14/99 _/_/_ City Engineer Agenda Item No. Agenda Item No. Agenda Title: Call for Sealed Proposals Date of Council Action: _/_/_ Project: Five Creeks Pedestrian/Bike Bridge Deadline Date for Project No. 1989-20 Council Action: / / Summary: The City's consultant, Baechtel Hudis Associates, has prepared plans for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle bridge across Five Creek. This bridge will provide safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian access between the "F" and "H"neighborhoods. The bridge shall be 6' wide and span approximately 100 feet. The Bicycle Master Plan adopted in 1995 designates a bridge at this location to complete the bicycle circulation plan for these neighborhoods. This project is categorically exempt from CEQA and consistent with the City's General Plan. This project is being sponsored by the City's Bicycle Committee and alternative transportation advocates. Bids will be opened on Tuesday, February 15, 2000, and referred to Council at its meeting on February 22, 2000. Construction should be completed by the Summer 2000. The estimated cost of the bike path is $80,000. Financing will be through the City's transportation capital funds. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: () Consent Item ( egular Item ( ) Approval ( ) Public Hearing Required ( )Not Recommended O ,Submitted with Comment ( Policy Determination by Council () City Comments: OP City Manager's Signature: q(kA)4 Date: ( `� (City Clerk Use Only) Council Action (If Other than Requested) Vote: RESOLUTION NO. 99- RESOLUTION CALLING FOR SEALED PROPOSALS FIVE CREEKS PEDESTRIAN/BIKE BRIDGE PROJECT NO. 1989-20 WHEREAS, the City Council has previously authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle bridge across Five Creek. NOW, THEREFORE, sealed proposals or bids for the installation of said improvements are hereby solicited and the City Manager is hereby directed to publish once a week for two weeks in the Community Voice a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for the installation of said improvements, referring to the plans and specifications on file in the City offices, the first publication of which shall be at least 14 days prior to the time fixed for opening bids. Said sealed proposals or bids shall be delivered to the City Manager of said City on or before 2:00 p.m. on the 14th day of February, 2000, said time being not less than 14 days from the time of first publication of said notice. Bids will be publicly opened, examined, and declared on said day and hour, and referred to Council at its meeting at 6:00 p.m. on February 22, 2000. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 1999. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Council: X Date By Miscellaneous F o k: Communications 1ugL/ /1£4R146--� Agendas,, 4 /94 s� /2/115 --1-3Project Summary Report Copy to: 7""'f -Copy to: Five Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridle Project Description: The proposed project consists of a 6 foot wide bridge spanning Five Creek for a distance of approximately 100 feet. The bridge will provide pedestrian and bicycle access between the "F" and "H" neighborhoods of the City. The proposed project is located at the east end of Fauna Avenue and the west end of Holly Avenue, as shown in Figure 1. Project Purpose: Currently there is no safe and convenient access between the "F" and "I-I" neighborhoods for pedestrians and bicycles. The Bicycle Master plan adopted in 1995 designates a bridge at this location to complete the Class III bike route circulation plan for these neighborhoods. This project is being advocated by the City's Bicycle Committee. Project Financing: Financing will be through capital outlay funds of the City of Rohnert Park. -- ', i ---)4 IV I VELL MI • V • VII * -----' 111111111111 111111W . Pfa"*‘4IP / rj illiNVillir44 f IN 0%, 14, •%Ait ,♦0 ' • ♦♦' PROPOSED ♦ ,� ' ' BRIDGE ♦ •..'' ♦♦' , ,♦♦♦' COl1 COURSE ,♦' if ! 0 tik• iii we . " P i Figure 1 Council: X Date By Miscellaneous Netter, Joseph Pb/;G , earl n A �Q� From: ted_shimkowski@agilent.com Copy to: Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 11:49 AM Copy to: To: Jnetter©rpcity.org Subject: Proposed Bridge at Five Creek Hello Mr. Netter, 12/2/99 I am sending you this letter to express my extreme dissatisfaction with the recent late notice of a proposed bridge over Five Creek. As a resident who lives only 200 yards from this proposed bridge, I am very angry that proper notifications were not sent to residents that live near this area. Ten years ago, I was the person who presented a signed petition indicating the local neighbors did NOT want a bridge at this location. Currently, the creek acts as a natural deterrent to any undesirables who want to casually wander our neighborhood. Because of this, the residents can quickly recognize anyone who does or does not belong in our neighborhood. I'm at a loss to understand why the city council must keep resurrecting projects that have been overwhelmingly turned down by the local neighborhood just because of a special interest group. If some means of casual crossing is necessary, then a simple concrete ford at the bottom of the channel would be sufficient and save the city's limited budget for other more pressing projects. Again, I urge you to recommend this project be permanently dropped from the city plan and I plan on attending the City Council meeting on Dec. 14 to reinforce this point. Respectfully, Ted & Dianna Shimkowski 614 Holly Ave. Rohnert Park Council: X Date By Miscellaneous r ;g. ,J Communications X iz•/t't? d�-- Netter, Joseph Pe,b/, eor --� Agenda/Z/',//yQ From: wayne/nancy thush [wayneandnancyt@prodigy. et i' r Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 1:48 PM Copy to: To: RP City Hall Copy to: Subject: Five Creek Bridge I live at 4400 Hollingsworth Ct here in RP and have just been advised that, without notifying any of the nearby residents, the Planning Commission has approved a bridge to span Five Creek at the west end of Holly St. This has a major, negative impact on me and all my neighbors. We do not want anything built there until we are notified of any plans & until we have input as to what, if anything, should go there. We pretty much like our neighborhood the way it is now. I cannot attend a City Council meeting on Dec 14th, SO PLEASE PUT A HALT TO NONSENSE NOW so we can have some input. M. Wayne Thush 586-8321 Proof of Publication of CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park will be holding a PUBLIC HEARING: WHERE: Council Chambers at the City Offices, 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park,CA 94928, WHEFtc December 14, 1999, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter Is reached PURPOSE: To solicit input regarding the construction of a bicycle/pedelfr ah bridge pro- posed between "F" and "H" Neighborhoods. The proposed facility Is a segment In the city's Approved Master Bike Way Plan. Related documents are avail- able for review at City Hall upon request. All persons Interested in this matter should appear at the December 14,1999 City Council meeting. Written statements may be submitted in advance for presentation to the commis- sion as part of the public hearing. NOTE: tf you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the pub- lic hearing described In this notice, or In written correspon- dence delivered to the city of Rohnert Park at,or prior,to,the public hearing. Questions regarding this mat- ter should be directed to: City Engineer Joe Gaffney (707)588-2240 Dated: November 29,1999 Planning File No.1865 322542-Pub.Dec.2,1999 1t1. • • Ulrich&Loretta Kuster Harry&Rose Sheehan Thomas Hakel 316 Firethorn Dr 322 Firethorn Dr 328 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Jerry&Irma Wilmot Elvie&Mary Bailey Iii Lexie Hartmaun&Martin Slavich 336 Firethorn Dr 342 Firethorn Dr 350 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Donald Albert&Cindy Clark Springer Mark&Patricia Eileen Davis Jacinto&Magdalena Gurjao 279 Fauna Ave 267 Fauna Ave 263 Fauna Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Robert&Sandra Tradewell Larry&Barbara Pickard Sheryl Ann Hoefling 259 Fauna Ave 255 Fauna Ave 251 Fauna Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Leonard&Trish Luna Craig&Janet Sanders Richard&Doris Endreszl 247 Fauna Ave 243 Fauna Ave 239 Fauna Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Charles&Lois Wells Nita Kruger Steven&Cynthia Fields 235 Fauna Ave 555 Calle De La Mesa 4495 Filbert Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Novato,CA 94949 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 William&Terri Palladino King Milan&Katty Mt Kangrga Azhar Ayub&Cherie Duran Khan Sr. 4491 Filbert Ct 4490 Filbert Ct 4494 Filbert Ct Rohnert Park. CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Edward J452315 Pedrani Philip&Deborah Lamaison Choi In Sung& Sung lin 4498 Filbert Ct 349 Firethorn Dr 341 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 David&Lisa Mcclelland Edgar&Karen Howard Paula Mace 325 Firethorn Dr 305 Firethorn Dr 245 Fairview Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Petaluma,CA 94952 William&Mary Jane Borah Jr. Jeffrey&Sandra Stone Roy&Martha Bie 291 Firethorn Dr 281 Firethorn Dr 275 Fauna Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Louis P449810 Padilla Christopher Owen Scott Charles&Nicole Terja Miller 252 Fig Ct 260 Fig Ct 261 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 • John&Kimberly Siebert Paul&Carolyn Ryzanych Mark Mcdonnell 253 Firethorn Dr 245 Firethorn Dr PO Box 3155 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 San Rafael, CA 94912 Harlan&Ingrid Mohn Rita Livar Daniel &Elisa Snow 235 Firethorn Dr 229 Firethorn Dr 3307 13Th St Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Clearlake, CA 95422 Chen-Cheng&Chin-Feng Kung William&Lynda Fagan Timothy Midboe 219 Firethorn Dr 211 Firethorn Dr 200 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Jerry&Linda Andersen Margaretha Johanna Kugler Gerald Martin&Mary Margaret Garies 208 Firethorn Dr 214 Firethorn Dr 220 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 William&Shirley Watkins Jacques&Patricia Lafitte Terri Silveira 226 Firethorn Dr 230 Firethorn Dr 234 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Betty Ann Comer Kenneth&Irene Carlson Ted August&Constance Power Heinse 238 Firethorn Dr 242 Firethorn Dr 250 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Rohnert Park.CA 94928 Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Joseph Aujay Robert G484437&Michele Eads Jack&Laura Penna Burkman 258 Firethorn Dr 264 Firethorn Dr 266 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Howard&Deanna Johnson Chu&Ying Chang Michael Farmer 276 Firethorn Dr 280 Firethorn Dr 288 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Brian&Christine Smith Michelle Wingert-Garris Larry Thomas&Rosalie Lucille Roudebusl 296 Firethorn Dr 300 Firethorn Dr 308 Firethorn Dr Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Leo Magers Kevin Hunter Robert&Jacqueline Corbett 223 Fauna Ave 219 Fauna Ave Family Trust Corbett Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 930 Montgomery St#500 San Francisco, CA 94133 Gene&Patricia Poon Jr. Eric Richard George Raymond Bolger 211 Fauna Ave 207 Fauna Ave 426 Luff Ln Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park. CA 94928 Redwood City, CA 94065 Kenneth&Diane Gembrin Nicolas&Kathleen Sidjakov Richard&Jennifer Schultz 204 Fauna Ave 208 Fauna Ave 212 Fauna Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Lawrence&Bonnie Ragan Sonoma Valley Investments Paul Louis Cadinha 216 Fauna Ave PO Box 1361 224 Fauna Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Sonoma, CA 95476 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Bahram Darakshan Thomas&Barbara Turner Arthur Clark&Arthur Clark 228 Fauna Ave 232 Fauna Ave 263 Fig Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Gregory&Polly Phillips Miguel Lopez Clarence Frost 255 Fig Ct 247 Fig Ct 920 Bayberry Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 ,Sebastopol, CA 95472 John&Sharon Gallagher William&Beverly Labone Sr. Cynthia Enquist 231 Fig Ct 225 Fig Ct 219 Fig Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park. CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Richard&Susan Gerbec Gregory Dodge Vennet John&Kathleen Vander 211 Fig Ct 205 Fig Ct 210 Fig Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park. CA 94928 Steve&Kathleen Barker Richard Echavarria James&Barbara Galaudet 216 Fig Ct 220 Fig Ct 224 Fig Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Paul O'Leary Joe Yoshikawa Paul O'Leary 231 Fig Ct 236 Fig Ct 231 Fig Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 r Philip Murikres Rick&Shirley Dempsey Michel Rantissi '4447 Hollingsworth Cir 4449 Hollingsworth Cir 4451 Hollingsworth Cir Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 M Sneh Lala James&Melinda Murray Charles&Yolanda Kitchen 4453 Hollingsworth Cir 4455 Hollingsworth Cir 4457 Hollingsworth Cir Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Elizabeth Maki Martin&Diane Hoch Raymond&Loretta Ballard 169 Pauahilani Way 4461 Hollingsworth Cir 4463 Hollingsworth Cir Kailua,HI 96734 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Petronila Garcia Constantine&Nelli Koltzoff John Olson Mellberg 4465 Hollingsworth Cir 4468 Hollingsworth Cir 4464 Hollingsworth Cir Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Montanya Marianne Dela Randall Dean&Nancy Ann Alban Irwin Lezzeni 4460 Hollingsworth Cir 4454 Hollingsworth Cir 4450 Hollingsworth Cir Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Thelma Williamsen Jeffrey&Mary Davis Thomas&Beverly Casey PO Box 1814 629 Holly Ave 38392 County Road 77 Rohnert Park, CA 94927 Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Lake George, CO 80827 Shirley Gee Bruce N490212 Peterson Mario&Donna Llamas 4472 Hollingsworth Cir 4431 Hickory Way 2237 Shannon Dr Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Steven Kane Leffler&Janice Brown Julio&Diana Perdomo PO Box 421 4438 Hollingsworth Cir 4428 Hollingsworth Cir Graton, CA 95444 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Herbert&Jackie Peck J Michael&Barabara Freitas Wayne&Shirley Geide 4424 Hollingsworth Cir 4420 Hollingsworth Cir 615 Holly Ave Rolmert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Roy&Charlotte Bradley Santokh&Sheila Singh Vasco&Renata Ciardella 9049 East Rd 231 Fauna Ave 227 Fauna Ave Redwood Valley, CA 95470 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Jay&Joan Ward David&Joette Brazell John&Marilyn Richardson 711 Holly Ave 721 Holly Ave 731 Holly Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Claudine Mary Fagan John&Beverly Purpus Steven Beretta 741 Holly Ave 751 Holly Ave 761 Holly Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 City Of Rohnert Park Michael&Victoria Hopkins Timothy&Janice Little 6750 Commerce Blvd 662 Holly Ave 650 Holly Ave Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park. CA 94928 Henry Spaugh&Kimberly Shayne Hilsman Ronald Dennis&Susan Glenda Broome Theodore&Dianna Shimkowski 638 Holly Ave 624 Holly Ave 614 Holly Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 William&Rebecca Jurewicz Robert&Mafalda Mendoza M Wayne&Nancy Anne Thush 4408 Hollingsworth Cir 4404 Hollingsworth Cir 4400 Hollingsworth Cir Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Marion&Fairy Adams David&Ruth Mochel Susan Line 4403 Hollingsworth Cir 4405 Hollingsworth Cir 4407 Hollingsworth Cir Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Russell&Nadine Vezzali Siegfried&Dee Urban Mark&Marcia Kostielney 4411 Hollingsworth Cir 4419 Hollingsworth Cir 4423 Hollingsworth Cir Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Abdolreza& Amy Tabrizi Lloyd&Diane Mccoy Randy& Donna Blankenbaker PO Box 2065 4431 Hollingsworth Cir 4433 Hollingsworth Cir San Mateo, CA 94401 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Richard Hayden Corbett R J&Gloria Jones 0 E&Bobbie Dehnert 4435 Hollingsworth Cir 4437 Hollingsworth Cir 1216 Eleanor Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 • Jo Anne Meyer Richard&Jeanette Dotka Kelly&Colete Owens 4441 Hollingsworth Cir 4443 Hollingsworth Cir 4445 Hollingsworth Cir Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Jonah Raskin Curtis&Debbie Lynn Bassignani David&Mary Hanson 1801 E Cotati Ave 4150 Heather Ln 4100 Heather Ln Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Sebastopol, CA 95472 Sebastopol, CA 95472 Jeffrey&Virginia Westerberg Robert& Sharon Stark Sam&Jane Lima 760 Holly Ave 750 Holly Ave 4220 Hermosa Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park. CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Kenneth&Marianne Lew Charles&Jeanne Klingbeil Eddie&Alison Yoshikawa 4216 Hermosa Ct 4212 Hermosa Ct 4208 Hermosa Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Jinunie& Sherlyn Rogers Mark&Lorraine Lee Haun Theodore Cooper 4204 Hermosa Ct 4203 Hermosa Ct PO Box 473 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park. CA 94928 Kentfield, CA 94914 Michael&Karen Lobao J Antonio&Bertha Lomeli Calvin&Jessie Sam 4209 Hermosa Ct 4213 Hermosa Ct 4219 Hermosa Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Philip&Malia Spratt Jeffrey Michael&Christina Knepper Lily Krulevitch 4308 Heather Ln 4304 Heather Ln 8 Lone Oak Ct Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Petaluma, CA 94952 • Donna Norris Lenore Huck Vondina Farrell 4301 Heather Ln 4305 Heather Ln 690 Holly Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Razieh Yousefi Alma Alice Floyd Timothy Smith 825 Alameda 670 Holly Ave 4467 Hollingsworth Cir Belmont, CA 94002 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Anthony&Barbara Sunseri Michael&Deborah Padia Henry&Carol Ho 4469 Hollingsworth Cir 4471 Hollingsworth Cir 4473 Hollingsworth Cir Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rose Dutto William&Joanne Thomas David&Merrie Bringhurst 689 Holly Ave 701 Holly Ave 705 Holly Ave Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 . Roy Si Martha Bie City Of Rohnert Park City Of Rohnert Park 275 Fauna Ave 6750 Commerce Blvd 6750 Commerce Blvd Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 MISCELLANEOUS � RECEIVED COMMUNICATIONS DEC 1 3 199 9 AGENDA/ • _ Dear CityCouncil ' - ` rr OF ! ��;and i Man. R�,HNER? PARK C�'YTO: JG �} ��� 'Ore-yc(Q A atM2•0 I am writing t.. : . - - • - iropose. bicycle/ pedestrian buddge across Five Creek that you have on your December 14, 1999 agenda. It has recently come to our attention by a neighbor, and just a few days ago a letter from the city explaining this proposal. We have not been given 30 days notice or any public notice prior to it coming up for a vote before the city council. This is unfair to the residents of this neighborhood to vote on something that will alter our neighborhood access and environment drastically. We asked that you either vote against the proposition to build a bridge, or in the least, give the neighborhood at least thirty days in which to respond. Because of the holiday season and many community events this time of year, it is difficult for residents to give up family, school, and community events to attend this City Council meeting, or to adequately prepare a defense argument against the building of this proposed bridge. Several of our neighbors are in the process of obtaining signatures on a petition to stop construction or a yes vote on this proposal. Approximately ten years ago a similar proposal came to our attention, when the city wished to build a vehicle bridge across the creek. We obtained a signature from every resident in both the "H" and the "F" sections that this would immediately affect. It was decided then by the city to not pursue a bridge across the creek. What was decided was a small concrete three foot or smaller walk way for pedestrians. Nothing more nothing less for just the immediate neighbors use. Now without our knowledge or approval something similar has been proposed by the Bicycle Committee. How many people are on this committee, and how much state money do they have to spend? Should this Bicycle Committee be allowed to determine a neighborhood's access and configuration that will alter it's safety and ambiance? I contend that a minor group of bicyclists should not have this advantage. Let us look at the pros and cons of such a construction project. Pros 1. A undetermined number of bicyclists, motorcyclists, and pedestrians will have access from Fauna to Holly Ave. along a nice scenic neighborhood route. In addition they will have access to Santa Rosa Ave. and Snyder Ave. via this route. Whoops, this second point should be in my negative or con column! Cons 1. Attractive nuisance- a. This may promote a gathering spot for juvenile who are unchaperoned and in a secluded area as seen in Jud Snyder's picture in the voice. b. this will promote easy access to all homes backing up to the golf course for possible criminal behavior. c. This project will promote children using the bridge for use of there skateboards, bicycles and other transportation modes such as roller blades. If they are in an unsupervised user friendly area and become injured, then telephones and greater access by ambulances will be needed. d. The more attractive the area, the more it will be used. The less attractive it is, the better we parents can convince our children to stay away from it, especially when they are greeted by mud in the winter there. e. My oldest son has found Playboy magazines, alcoholic beverage containers there a few years back, and now my sons say that it is a spot where they have seen drugs being purchased! Do we want to promote more people using this creek? f. We have three known drug dealers in our neighborhood, and I have spotted many undesirable looking youths and adults walking through the creek to these drug dealers homes. Do we want to make access easier for them? 2. City Interests- a. In order to build and maintain the bridge, the current 6' cyclone fence and gate will have to be removed, which will allow greater access that is currently restricted by the gate. b. This project will bring more traffic from a commercial area, to a residential area. c. Holly Ave. is a narrower street than Fauna Ave., and any bridge and through traffic will be affected by the size difference. d. The city put up a sign on Holly into the circle area that says "Not a Through Street'. Doesn't this show the willingness of the city to keep this area as a minor traffic area and not promote more traffic through both sides of the creeks areas? ( Incidentally, great Police and Fire emergency equipment access is not needed here as evidenced by the Fire departments quick response to a house fire on Hickory Way from the Country Club Fire Station and "M" section station, from Country Club Dr. to Fairway north to Holly then on around to Hickory. This is the quickest route. If there is a need for emergency vehicles in "F" section, then it would be quickest to dispatch along Country Club, west on Fairway and around to Fauna, etc.) 3. Other Interested Parties- a. This will promote access to Mountain Shadows Golf course fairways which is privately owned or by the city, and will promote after hours unsupervised use of the course, it's walkways and property. Which if an injury occurs on this property, will be open for litigation as partial liability. b. This bridge will block access to the creek area for the water agency to clear out debris, overgrowth, and garbage which could obstruct the natural flow of water to empty the areas drains to prevent flooding. c. This will give people access to state water ways which are strictly managed by the state water department, and any alteration or obstruction will be greatly objected to by them. 4. Criminal Activity- a. This gives bicyclists and pedestrians easy access to the back yards of many peoples homes which could result in criminal behavior. b. Mr. MacKenzie, do you remember what happed to your bike when it was stolen and Leff Brown witnessed it's seizure and subsequent flight along a creek path on Hillview? Won't this give vandals more opportunity to seize other property from our neighborhood? I propose, if there is any money to be spent state, city, or otherwise that it be used to improve the existing bicycle lanes near Creekside Middle School and Mountain Shadows Middle School. On December 7th a Creekside student had his leg broken by a car on Snyder Lane. There have been at least five bicycle accidents involving students and cars along Snyder that I am aware of. There have also been numerous accidents involving Mountain Shadow students and cars. Last week a El Camino student was hit by a car near Mountain Shadows. Clearly these areas require further commitment on the city's part to promote safety of our pedestrians, bicyclists, and students along our busy thoroughfares! If any money is spent to develop bicycle paths on Rohnert Park, then it should be where it is the most needed. Clearly Snyder Lane and Southwest Blvd. with it's increased traffic, needs more attention to safe bike paths then in our small neighborhood creek area. Please use these funds where it will do the most good for our city and not for just a few! I would appreciate a response before the December 14th Council meeting as a number of my neighbors and I plan on attending the meeting and would like to know the cities and Councils attentions prior, so that we know if we may have another month to seek legal council and more neighborhood residents to voice their concerns. After hearing these concerns, why would anyone vote to build a pedestrian bridge on Five Creek? Thank you so much for your kind attention in this manner. I look forward to hearing from you soon. I know we can come to an agreement that benefits the neighborhood and all of the cities residents in this tight financial time. Sincerely, Janice Brown 4438 Hollingsworth Circle Rohnert Park, CA. 94928 707-584-9706 ec: J� ry 5 Here as an individual resident of neighborhood and also unofficial spokesperson for some other neighborhood residents. f : ?le yLIe hvoiso Some other residents may want to speak for themselves. I'm here specifically to: Discuss then Five Creek bicycle bridge project, AND To ask Council to postpone taking action on it tonight. The main reason for myself and other neighborhood residents being here tonight is because it is the ONLY opportunity given to us to comment on it. City staff will say we had opportunity to speak before Planning Commission a couple of weeks ago, but nobody from the neighborhood showed up. The simple reason for that is...no one knew about it! Unlike something as simple as a garage conversion, where neighbors within 300 feet are notified by mail in case they have an objection, that did not happen here. No notices were mailed! As a result, only one to speak about project before the Plan Comm was a member of the Bicycle Advisory Comm....projexct advocates for the bridge. Problem is, if anyone had bothered asking, they would have found prevailing attitude in neighborhood would be for a BRICK WALL, not a BRIDGE!! Many reasons why neighbors don't want bridge. More relevant question from our standpoint is: why is bridge necessary at all if no one in neighborhood wants it!. Differences need to be discussed openly. I went to BAC last night (only opportunity). Somewhere between Bridge and a Brick Wall, there is a compromise. We need time to find out what everyone can live with. Partial comments of Dave Mochel, 12/14/99 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Department: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ***City Clerk Use Only*** Meetin Date Held Until Submitted By: Sergeant Don McNair /2,//y P9 Item o. Agenda Title: Taxicab Application by Malcolm Jacobson Date of Action: Deadline Date for: Council Action: Requested Council Action: Information Summary: I have reviewed the application submitted by Malcolm Jacobson. There are several applications and procedures that need to be completed before final approval: 1. Adherence to all requirements of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code sections 5.20.010 through 5.20.180.. Special attention to section 5.20.130(Drug and alcohol testing). 2. Completion of the Public Safety "Taxi Driver" application. 3. Completion of the Public Safety"Taxicab" application and inspection of each vehicle by this department. 4. Completion of the Department of Justice background fingerprint card and the return of the background information from DOJ. 5. Drivers license check. 6. Review and adherence to all applicable California Vehide Codes covering "Taxicabs". After Successfully completing the above process,the application will be reviewed by the Director of Public Safety. CITYpAGER'S RECOMMENDATION• ()Consent Item (t'egular Time (r proval (Public Hearing Required ()Not Recommended NOTE: The Application for Certificate presented at this time&the public ( ) Submitted with Comment hearing represent the initial preliminary procedures stipulated in the Muni Code, ()Policy Determination by Council PRIOR to submittal of the actual Application for Permit to the Dept.of Public Safety,which would then include completion of above-reviewed procedures ( )City Comments: RFFnaF granting rio.l up troval City Manager's Signature: 99)//4<adt? Date: /2/it2/ ? jh- shells\coundl agenda transmittal rk- City Clerk Use Only Council Action Vote: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park will be holding a PUBLIC HEARING. WHERE: Council Chambers at the City Offices 6750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park, California WHEN: Tuesday, December 14, 1999, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter is reached. PURPOSE: To solicit input regarding consideration of an application from Malcolm D. Jacobson, an individual, for Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for a Taxi Cab service for the City of Rohnert Park. Representatives of this proposal will be available to respond to questions. Related documents are available for review at City Hall upon request. All persons interested in this matter should appear at the regular City Council meeting. Written statements may be submitted in advance for presentation to the Council as part of the public hearing. NOTE: If you challenge the approval of this application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Rohnert Park at, or prior to, the public hearing. Questions regarding this matter should be directed to: City Manager Joseph D. Netter(707) 588-2226, or Deputy City Clerk Judy Hauff(707) 588-2227. Joseph D. Netter Dated: December 1, 1999 City Manager 1,4rPOST: City Hall - Department of Public Safety - Recreation Department - Library(via Fax 584-8561) FAXED TO: COMMUNITY VOICE - Attn: Cathy Gore for Legals - 935-8304 - Please publish in the Wednesday, December 8, 1999 edition of the Community Voice, and provide the City tW p qv((f Manager's Office with a confirmation of this publication. `WWWW , .V 1.1` -Attn: Jud Snyder,Editor-584-2233 -For your information. PRESS DEMOCRAT - Attn: Carol Loveland, Legals - 521-5307 - Please publish in the Saturday, December 4, 1999 edition 1`` ,r' gg44( for compliance with 10-day public hearing notice requirement,and provide the City Manager's 4Qt`v t V Office with a confirmation of this publication. 1 CI `� Attn: Jim Sweeney,Reporter-521-5239-For your information. cc: City Councilmembers Thank you. Joseph D. Netter, City Manager Troy C. Dealing,Admin.Assistant to the City Manager Judy Hauff, Deputy City Clerk Betsy Strauss, City Attorney-FOR VEHICLES CODES (Direct Phone: 588-2216) Joseph G. Gaffney, City Engineer Wendie Schulenburg,Planning Director Patrick E. Rooney,Public Safety Director Donald McNair,Public Safety Sergeant -w/REQUEST BY COPY OF THIS NOTICE FOR E-MAIL STATUS REPORT ON CURRENT TAXI SVCS. IN ROHNERT PARK for the 12/14/99 Council meeting packets to be distributed 12/9/99. Sandy Lipitz,Accounting Supervisor-FOR BUSINESS LICENSE PROCEDURES&REQUIREMENTS Caroline Gabriel,Purchasing Supervisor-FOR INSURANCE PROCEDURES&REQUIREMENTS Malcolm D. Jacobson, 150 Walnut Circle,Rohnert Park, CA 94928 1i JH-h:phnotice 121499-Taxi Cab Permit Application-Jacobson • CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY APPLICATION NAME & ADDRESS: DATE: 0/5/77t / 9 G4.I..N4 j)' J/�G Li�j:>OXJ PHONE: ✓ g `" / 7 =111111111111111111111111111 Oril Date Ica 111111 MN MIN EN 9'/ cute 11111111/r 2. Number of vehicles proposed to be operated under this permit: 3. Number of vehicles presently being operated, if any: — 4. Make, type, year of manufacture and passenger seating capacity for each vehicle proposed to be operated for which a permit is being requested: r}/, QL Irv' ,,q 7"/01,,1-,s 5. Describe the proposed color scheme, insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of the taxicab to be used: &i4'5 Gel/7-4 /f,e . ,�t��/ / E'alCJ/✓�/�J /rj P C9G/ Try 1.x.)€)(7 4/`) 6. Any further facts which you believe tend to prove that public convenience �and necessity require the granting of a permit:45- s"724 re,�' �� '� /_} j,d2,4. 7. Proposed rates to be charged: (;., • %/4' ,v���e °s(i 77? / ,IC 72/)°) Please return this Application with $25.00 Filing Fee made payable to City of Rohnert Park to: City Clerk 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Date: 11/23/99 To: Judy From: Beth We received an Application for Public Convenience & Necessity from Malcolm Jacobson on November 15. 1999. We have 10-30 days for Council to hold a Public Hearing. The 12/14 Council Meeting is 29 days after we received the application, so it has to be Agendized then. The Notice of Public Hearing must be in the paper Saturday, December 4. (10 days before the Hearing) 11-35/1210 MALCOLM D JACOBSON 2 150 WALNUT CIR !�G ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 Date��rG T Pay to of the t' �J�9�r�i � $[45.7 .._ ,. Order �it9 `F`� Dollars 15�: IR sank of America Rohnert Park Branch 1106 6545 Hunter Drive • Rohnert Park,GA 94928 (707) 542-4433 For �J�P I: L21.0003S131:0372lItLLO621110L44011' Malcolm D. Jacobson 150 Walnut Circle �� ��� Rohnert Park, Ca. /q7 (707)586-9735 TO: Rohnert Park City Clerk, City Manager,And All City Council Members. Re: Application For Certificate Of Public Convenience And Necessity. I would like to begin a Taxi Cab service for the city of Rohnert Park. The name of this service would be Rohnert Park Taxi. The color scheme of the Taxi service would be white cars with blue lettering outlined in gold. I am requesting a permit to operate two Taxicabs at the start up of this service and to add three more as business increases. I would also like a conditional permit to operate up to a total of ten Taxicabs.These conditions being: (1) A good report from the Chief of Police as to how this service is run at the time of application of each additional permit. (2) That I can show the need for additional permits based on records. (3) That all rules and regulations have met or exceeded those set forth by All persons concerned. The make,model, and year of these Taxicabs(2) will be provided upon notice that a certificate of public convenience and necessity may be issued.They will be based on rules and regulations set forth by the city council and the Chief of Police. The current rates being charged in Santa Rosa are $2.00 at beginning of each trip and $2.00 per mile thereafter. I would like to set my rates at $2.00 at the beginning of each trip and $1.80 per. mile. With my rates set at this amount it is equal to a 20% discount for all seniors and students without them having to ask for it. Listed below are several reasons why there is an urgent need for this service. (1)The person who misses their bus and can't wait to get a Taxi from Santa Rosa. (2)The waitress that works until 11:P.M and has to have her spouse that has to get up at 4 A.M to pick her up. (3)The person who gets off the Santa Rosa Airporter and needs a Taxi to get to where he or she is going. (4)For the person who drops their car off to be repaired and the only other alternative is to rent a car for a couple of days. (5)For the senior citizen that is afraid to drive but does it anyway so they can buy their groceries for a week. (6)For the person in the bar that decides to drive because he could not get a Taxi. I believe these are valid reasons to issue a certificate of convenience and necessity. Santa Rosa taxicabs do not want to come to Rohnert Park to pick up a senior citizen to drive them a mile to a clinic or a market. Malcolm D. Jacobson 150 Walnut Circle Rohnert Park, Ca. 94928 (707)586-9735 5 . 16 . 070 of a misdemeanor , and upon conviction thereof , shall be sub- ject to a fine of not less than one hundred dollars and not more than five hundred dollars , or by imprisonment in the jail of the county for a term of not more than six months , or by both such fine and imprisonment . Any violation of the provisions of this chapter or any of the terms and conditions of any dance or dance hall permit by a permittee hereunder is deemed to be disorderly and im- proper conduct and is grounds for revocation of the permit without further notice , provided , however , that upon request the chief of police shall hold a public hearing within five days of the revocation as to whether such revocation of the permit shall remain in force. Any revocation of a permit is subject to appeal to the city council as provided in Sec- tion 5. 16 .040 . (Ord. 112 §7 , 1969) . Chapter 5 . 20 VEHICLES FOR HIRE* Sections : 5 . 20 .010 Purpose and intent. 5 . 20 .020 Definitions . 5 . 20 .030 Certificate of public convenience and neces- sity--Required--Application . 5 . 20 .040 Certificate--Hearing--When held--Notice. 5 . 20 .050 Certificate--Hearing--Findings . 5 . 20 .060 Existing taxicab and public transportation service. 5 . 20 .070 Insurance . 5 . 20 . 080 Sale or transfer of business . 5 . 20 .090 Transfer of vehicle. 5 . 20 .100 Cancellation and suspension of certificate . 5 . 20 . 110 Business license. 5 . 20 . 120 Inspection and maintenance of vehicles . 5 . 20 .130 Operating regulations . 5 . 20 . 140 Driver's qualifications . 5 . 20 .150 Stands . 5 . 20 . 160 Rates . 5 . 20 . 180 Penalty for violations . * For statutory provisions authorizing local authorities to license and regulate vehicles for hire , see Veh . Code §616501, 21100 and 21112 ; for financial responsi- bility laws concerning vehicles for hire , see Veh . Code §§16500--16503. 4111 87 5 . 20 . 010--5 . 20 . 030 10 5 . 20 .010 Purpose and intent . The full and sole purpose of this chapter is one of regulation for the public good and under no circumstances whatsoever shall any certificate of convenience and necessity , license or permit provided for herein constitute or be deemed to be a property right or right of livelihood vested in the holder of any such certificate , permit or license. (Ord. 50 §15 , 1964) . 5 . 20 .020 Definitions . The following words and phrases when used in this chapter shall have the meanings set forth in this section: A. Owner means any and/or every person who in any man- ner has the proprietary use , ownership , or control of any passenger-carrying motor propelled vehicle. B . Person includes any person, firm or corporation. C . Public transportation vehicles means every motor propelled vehicle not otherwise defined in this section used in the business of transporting passengers over the streets of the city irrespective of whether or not any fee, compensa- tion, or consideration is paid for such transportation, ex- cepting any transportation system operating over a fixed route under a certification of public convenience and neces- sity issued by the Public Utilities Commission. D. Taxicab means any motor propelled vehicle used for the transportation of passengers who direct the route to be S travelled over the streets and not operated over a fixed route for compensation including vehicles commonly known as limou- sines and sight-seeing buses . (Ord. 50 §l , 1964) . 5 . 20 . 030 Certificate of public convenience and neces- sity--Required--Application. A. It is unlawful for any per- son to engage in the business of operating or causing to be operated any taxicab or public transportation vehicle for hire in the city without first having obtained from the city council a certificate of public convenience and necessity. B . All persons applying for such certificate shall file with the council a certified application which should contain the following information: 1 . Name and address of persons making application; 2 . Number of vehicles proposed to be operated under the permit requested; 3. Number of vehicles presently being operated, if any ; 4 . The make , type , year of manufacture , and passenger seating capacity for each vehicle proposed to be operated for which a permit will be requested ; 5 . The description of the proposed color scheme , insignia, or other distinguishable characteristics of the taxicab to be used ; 6 . Any further facts which the applicant believes tend to prove that public convenience and necessity require . the granting of a permit; 7 . Proposed rates to be charged. (Ord. 50 §2 , 1964) . 88 5 . 20 . 040--5 . 20 . 060 11 5 .20 . 040 Certificate--Hearing--When held--Notice . Upon receipt of any application referred to hereinabove , the city clerk shall set a time not less than ten, nor more than thir- ty days thereafter, for the hearing of the application before the city council and notice shall be given to the applicant by mail of the time so set at least five days before the date of such hearing. A notice shall be published once in a news- paper of general circulation in the city at least ten days prior to the hearing. _app-1 a- - s Ra o the city_ clerk the sum of twenty-five dollars as and for a filingfee. (Ord. 5 .20 . 050 Certificate--Hearing--Findings . No certificate of public convenience and necessity shall be granted until the council shall , after the hearing , declare by resolution that the public convenience and necessity require the proposed service and that the following conditions exist: A. That the applicant is financially responsible , and that the applicant is of good moral character , or that the of- ficers of the applicant are of good moral character ; B . That the persons holding permits or licenses for the operation of motor vehicles for hire are under the experienced and efficient management earning a fair and reasonable return of their capital devoted to such service ; C . That the applicant has complied with the provisions . of all city , state and federal laws applicable to the proposed operation; D. That the additional service will not result in a greater hazard to the public, and will not create traffic con- gestion or parking problems ; E. If the council finds from its investigation and hear- ing that the public convenience and necessity justify the creating of an additional certificate and the granting of per- mits requested thereunder, it shall notify the applicant of its findings . Within sixty days thereafter the applicant shall furnish to the city manager any and all additional information which may be required, and if the city manager then finds the vehicles proposed to be used by the applicant meet the require- ments of this chapter , he shall thereupon issue to the appli- cant a certificate of public convenience and necessity. F. If the city council finds from such investigation and hearing the public convenience and necessity does not justify the granting of an additional certificate , it shall forthwith notify the applicant of the finding. (Ord. 50 §4 , 1964) . 5 . 20 .060 Existing taxicab and public transportation ser- vice . Every owner operating a licensed taxicab or taxicabs or public transportation vehicle for hire prior to the effec- tive date of the ordinance codified in this chapter shall be 41/0 89 5. 20 . 070--5 . 20 .080 11 presumed , to the absence of any contrary evidence presented to the council , to have provided prima facie evidence of pub- lic convenience and necessity for the licensing of the taxicab or public transportation vehicles for hire in operation, and the city council, upon application received not later than fifteen days after the effective date of the ordinance codi- fied in this chapter , shall grant a certificate of public convenience and necessity to such owners for the number of taxicabs or public transportation vehicles held by such owner on the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chap- ter. (Ord. 50 §5 , 1964) . 5 .20 .070 Insurance . No certificate of public convenience and necessity shall be issued or continued in operation unless *-1.7-- there is in full force and effect and covering each vehicle classified hereunder a policy of insurance in such form as the council of the city shall deem proper, executed by an insurance company approved by the council , which policy shall insure the public against any loss or damage that may result from the operation of said vehicle and provided further that the policy of insurance shall provide for maximum recovery of not less than the following schedule : A. For injury or death of any one person in any one . accident , five hundred thousand dollars; B . For injury or death of two or more persons in any one accident , one million dollars; C. For injury or destruction of property in any one acci- dent, one hundred thousand dollars . Such person may , in lieu of the aforesaid policy of lia- bility insurance , file with the city clerk of the city a bond in such form and in such amount as is approved by the council of said city . Said sum shall be in an amount reasonably neces- sary for the protection and safety of the public. In determining the insurance requirements herein speci- fied , the city shall credit any bonds or cash posted with the state of California for such purposes , provided the bonds or cash posted fulfills all the requirements of this section. (Ord. 394 §1, 1981: Ord. 274 §1 , 1975; Ord. 50 §6 , 1964) . 5 . 20 .080 Sale or transfer of business . If an owner to whom a certificate of convenience and necessity has been is- sued desires to sell or transfer his business , the intended buyer must make application to the city for a certificate of convenience and necessity as required by this chapter. The seller and holder of the certificate must file an affidavit of intention to surrender and cancel the existing certificates and licenses conditionally upon and concurrently with consum- • mation of sale and issuance of new certificates and licenses in the name of the buyer . 90 (Rohnert Park 4/82) 5 . 20 . 090--5 . 20 . 120 /0 If the buyer applicant meets the requirements as set forth in this chapter for the issuance of a certificate of convenience and necessity , the city shall issue a new certif- icate to the buyer and concurrently therewith shall cancel the seller's certificate. (Ord. 50 §7 , 1964) . 5 . 20 .090 Transfer of vehicle . In the event an owner sells or transfers title to a taxicab or vehicle for which a license has been issued , or in the event the vehicle has been destroyed, the owner is entitled as a matter of right to have a new license issued for the taxicab or vehicle replacing the one so sold or transferred upon proper application to the city clerk within forty-five days after such sale, transfer or destruction. If a vehicle is withdrawn from service for a period of forty-five days without written permission being first se- cured from the city manager, the license for such vehicle shall be automatically cancelled and the certificate shall be reduced by one or more , as the case may be . (Ord. 50 §8 , 1964) . 5 . 20 . 100 Cancellation and suspension of certificate . A certificate issued under the provisions of this chapter may be revoked or s nded by the city council if the holder 110 thereof has : A. Violated any of the provisions of this chapter; B . Discontinued operations for a period of five days , or more ; C. Has violated any ordinances of the city , or of the state of California , or of the United States , the violations of which reflect unfavorably on the fitness of the holder to offer public transportation . Before suspension or revocation, the holder of the certi- ficate shall be given reasonable notice of the proposed ac- tion to be taken and shall have an opportunity to be heard by the city council. (Ord. 50 §9 , 1964) . 5 . 20 . 110 Business license . No person shall be entitled to receive a business license to operate a vehicle of the class herein defined without first having received a certif- icate of public convenience and necessity as set forth here- in. (Ord. 50 §10 , 1964) . 5 . 20 . 120 Inspection and maintenance of vehicles . All vehicles for which a certificate of public convenience and necessity has been issued hereunder shall be under the super- vision and control of the chief of police and no owner or driver shall operate, or permit to be operated, any vehicle 4110 91 5.20.130--5.20.140 ' in the city while said equipment used therein is defective, unsafe, or in any unsani- tary condition, and every such vehicle shall be at all times subject to the inspection of any police officer of the city. The chief of police is authorized and directed to suspend without previous no- tice, any vehicle operating pursuant to this chapter whenever an owner or driver vio- lates any of the sections of this chapter. Any owner may appeal such decision in writ- ing to the city council who shall, after due notice to the owner, conduct a hearing and determine the matter and its decision therein shall become final. The city council may order a continued suspension of such license until such time as the vehicle shall be restored to a safe or sanitary condition. An owner or driver knowingly permitting any condition prohibited by this sec- tion shall be subject to the penalty provided herein for violation of this chapter. (Ord. 50§11, 1964). 5.20.130 Operating regulations.A. Any driver employed to transport passengers to a definite point shall take the most direct route that will take the passengers to their destination safely and ex- peditiously. B. Every taxicab shall be equipped with a meter which shall be approved by the chief of police. The meter shall at all times accurately show the fee to be charged. PC. If requested, every driver shall give a receipt upon a payment of the cor- rect fare. D. It is unlawful for any person except where credit is extended to refuse to pay the lawful fare affixed herein for the use of any vehicle covered by this chapter. E. It is unlawful for any driver to refuse when the vehicle is in service and not otherwise engaged to transport any person who presents himself, or is presented for carriage, in a sober and orderly manner and for a lawful purpose. F. It shall be a ground for the revocation of a driver's permit issued, pur- suant to this chapter, for any driver to charge a passenger a fare greater than that to which he is entitled under the provisions of this chapter. It is unlawful for the owner or driver of any vehicle under the chapter to conduct his business from any place other than the established place of business set forth in the certificate of convenience and necessity. (Ord. 50 §12, 1964). 5.20.140 Driver's qualifications. It is unlawful for any person to operate or drive a vehicle for hire in the city without first having complied with the following re- quirements: 1111 92 (Rohnert Park 2/96) 5.20.140 A. The prospective driver shall test negative for each of the controlled sub- stances specified in Part 40 (commencing with Section 40.1) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations before the driver is employed. 1. Each prospective driver shall test negative for the controlled sub- stances specified in Part 40 (commencing with Section 40.1) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations and for alcohol as a condition of employment and as a condition of driver's permit renewal no less infrequently than every two years. A negative test for alcohol means an alcohol screening test showing a breath alcohol of less than 0.02 percent. 2. Procedures shall be substantially as in Part 40 (commencing with Section 40.1) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, except that the driver shall show a valid California driver's license at the time and place of testing, and except as provided otherwise in this section. Requirements for rehabilitation and for return-to- duty and followup testing and other requirements, except as provided otherwise in this section, shall be substantially as in Part 382 (commencing with Section 382.101) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 3. A test in one jurisdiction shall be accepted as meeting the same requirement in any other jurisdiction. Any negative test result shall be accepted for one year as meeting a requirement for periodic permit renewal testing or any other periodic testing in that jurisdiction or any other jurisdiction, if the driver has not tested positive subsequent to a negative result. However, an earlier negative result . shall not be accepted as meeting the pre-employment testing requirement for any subsequent employment, or any testing requirements under the program other than periodic testing. 4. In the case of a self-employed independent driver, the test results shall be reported directly to the chief of police of the city of Rohnert Park who shall no- tify the taxicab leasing company of record, if any, of positive results. In all other cases, the results shall be reported directly to the employing transportation operator, who shall be required to notify the chief of police of the city of Rohnert Park of positive results. 5. All tests results are confidential and shall not be released without the consent of the driver, except as authorized or required by law. 6. Self-employed independent drivers shall be responsible for compli- ance with, and shall pay all costs of, this program with regard to themselves. Em- ploying transportation operators shall be responsible for compliance with, and shall pay all costs of, this program with respect to their employees and potential employees, except that an operator may require employees who test positive to pay the costs of re- habilitation and of return-to-duty and followup testing. 93 (Rohnert Park 2/96) 5.20.150 7. Upon the request of a driver applying for a permit, the city of Rohnert Park shall give the driver a list of the consortia certified pursuant to Part 382 (commencing with Section 382.101) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations that the city of Rohnert Park knows offer tests in or near the jurisdiction. 8. No evidence derived from a positive test result pursuant to the pro- gram shall be admissible in a criminal prosecution concerning unlawful possession, sale or distribution of controlled substances. B. No individual shall be employed or offered employment as a taxicab driver nor shall the individual applicant be issued a driver's permit in the city of Rohnert Park until and unless he or she has complied with all of the requirements of this section. C. The driver's permit shall state the name, address and telephone of the employer. D. The employer shall notify the chief of police of the city of Rohnert Park upon termination of the driver's employment. The driver's permit shall be returned to the chief of police and shall become void upon termination. E. The chief of police may refuse to issue a driver's permit, or may revoke a permit for any of the following reasons: 11) 1. The applicant is under twenty-one years of age; 2. The applicant has not resided in the county of Sonoma for thirty days prior to filing the application; 3. The applicant does not possess a valid chauffeur's license issued by the state of California; 4. The applicant is convicted or has been convicted of reckless driving or a crime involving moral turpitude, or of driving while under the influence of intox- icating liquor or narcotics. F. The city may charge a reasonable fee commensurate with the cost of con- ducting any tests or investigations of the prospective driver or licensee to cover the cost of the program. (Ord. 610 §2, 1995: Ord. 274§2, 1975: Ord. 50§13, 1964). 5.20.150 Stands. Council may by resolution locate and designate taxicab or vehicle for hire stands, and said stands shall be appropriately designated. The chief of police shall recommend, in writing, to the council for their approval, the location of such stands. 10 94 (Rohnert Park 2/96) 5.20.160--5.20.170 Before any designation of private stands is made, the written consent thereto must be obtained of the tenant of the ground floor fronting space where such stand is to be located, or in the event the ground floor is not occupied, the written consent thereto of the owner of the building or land must first be obtained. Open stands may be authorized and designated by action of the city council to be open to any vehicle for hire for which a certificate has been duly issued. The city council may designate stands for specific vehicles for hire and shall state which vehi- cles and which owners are entitled to use those stands. It is unlawful for the owner or operator of any other vehicle for hire, other than the permittee, to use a stand des- ignated specifically to such individual. (Ord. 50 §14, 1964). 5.20.160 Rates. Each owner and driver operating in the city shall have posted in each vehicle the rates to be charged for carrying passengers from point to point, or on a time basis. The city council of the city may from time to time adopt rates by resolution after conducting a hearing thereon, and said resolution shall become of the same force and effect as though incorporated in this chapter. Each owner and driver operating in the city shall charge according to the schedule of rates as provided in such resolutions and it shall be unlawful to charge at any rate other than those set forth therein. (Ord. 50 §17, 1964). 5.20.170 Penalty for violations. In addition to the provisions of this chapter providing for revocation, suspension, or change of certificates, licenses or permits, as S the case may be, any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be subject to a fine of not more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than six months or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 50 §16, 1964). • 941 (Rohnert Park 2/96) r -itIET't "< 11/171G1g t�s Memorandum Co, to: EMZEI DATE: December 7, 1999 TO: Joe Netter, City Manager FROM: Patrick Rooney, Director of Public Safet BY: Robert Cassel, Commander RE: Preparations for Operation during period December 30, 1999 to January 2, 2000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The two city department that have key response and operation responsibility at all times are the Public Safety and Public Works Departments. As a result of extensive planning and information sharing these two departments have developed a response plan for the period of the"millenium change." Public Safety will be increasing staffing in throuonout the department beginning with a 100% increase in staffing on Thursday, December 30`�, Friday and December 315t Saturday, January 1s`a 75% increased staffing pattern will be in place and on Sunday, January 2nd a 25% increased staffing pattern will be used. On Monday, January 3`d there will be two additional officers on duty during the day shift(7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). Public Works will have"Holiday staffing" in place on December 31st until 6:00 p.m. Beginning at 6:00 p.m. special staffing will provide one supervisor and five maintenance workers. This staffing will be continued until 6:00 p.m. Saturday, January 1st. Both department will have the ability to recall additional workers if conditions warrant. HISTORICAL INFORMATION Beginning in early 1999 staff began planning for the period of December 1999 through January 2000. Several issues were identified as critical. These were all operational issues as opposed to the technological issues that were the focus of much of the media and sensationalism. The planning group led by Lieutenant John Thompson and Public Works Manager Bill Stephens identified that the needs for an operational plan to address any actual events that occurred during this time frame. Information that was available at that time and during the most of the planning period reflected high potential for crowd control, system failure and system recovery needs. As time has progressed the technological needs have been addressed at other levels (corporate, county, state and federal). The resulting need for planning reflected only immediate response needs to our citizens and to support our neighboring communities. CURRENT INFORMATION The number of high concentration events has decreased and the scale of them has changed. Although there may be large events in major metropolitan areas (San Francisco, San Jose, Los Angeles) large scale events in our proximity have diminished. The exception being Fist Night in Santa Rosa. Since First Night is a family oriented, non-alcoholic event the potential for significant problems is considered to be reduced. On technological fronts, concerns regarding electricity, gas, water, phone and other"essential" services have been tested, evaluated and the systems have either been determined to be Y2K compliant or adequate backups are in place to operate the systems for acceptable periods of time to implement solutions specific to the problems. However, some specific potentials for concern still exist. These include citizen created problems such as a large number of people checking their phones shortly after midnight and causing excessive demand for service and citizen driven over-reaction causing stockpiling of supplies, fuels and resources and finally, the occurrence of crimes of opportunity based around the event. To address these specific potential problems the planning team has identified additional staffing plans and has implemented them. Attached please find the specific plans from the two departments and a graphical display and plan for specific Public Safety deployment will be presented at the City Council meeting on December 14, 1999. 2 MEMORANDUM DATE: December TO: �atrick E. Rooney, Director FRO5_, Thomas R. Bullard, Police Services Commander RE: e Y2K Staff Report and Estimated Overtime Costs Attached is the staff report written by Sergeant Dan Murray discussing preparations and staffing plans during the Y2K weekend celebration. This report addresses the agency's plan with regard to staffing of police and fire services, patrol assignments, and areas of concern within our city, as well as commitments to have personnel ready for HazMat incidents, officer involved critical incidents, and mutual aid requests from the Sonoma County Sheriffs Department. Although there will be considerable employee overtime hours during this holiday event, management has very closely analyzed the needs of the agency and the city to ensure adequate protection and services will be provided to our citizens. We have made significant cuts and adjustments to ensure we are not overstaffed and are not being irresponsible with the amount of money expended on overtime hours. The estimate cost of overtime to the city is $29,323.84. The breakdown of these hours is: Lieutenant 53.12 x 40 hours 2,124.80 Sergeant 43.85 x 80 hours 3,508.00 PSO 39.00 x 500 hours 19,500.00 Dispatcher 30.41 x 54 hours 1,642.14 CSO 27.20 x 40 hours 1,088.00 Property 38.52 x 15 hours 577.00 ID 37.61 x 10 hours 376.10 Records 25.35 x 20 hours 507.00 Total 29,323.84 To: Thomas Bullard/ Commander From: John P. Thompson/LieutenanC�' By: Dan R. Murray/ Sergeant Subject: Y2K Staffing Date: December 7, 1999 Summary: This plan has been developed to provide service to our community in conjunction with all law enforcement agencies in Sonoma County. We have increased staffing in the patrol and fire divisions as well as the animal shelter and records division. All members of this organization have been advised that there would be no requested time off from the 27t1i of December through the 2nd of January. This department will be prepared to provide maximum service to the community. History: The following staffing recommendations were developed after planning meetings with law enforcement agencies from Sonoma County, department staff meetings, and with other city departments. This agency has made a commitment to provide personnel ready to respond for Haz-Mat Incidents, Officer Involved Critical Incidents, and Mutual Aid requests from the Sheriff's Department. Planned events in this time period that could impact this department's staffing: 1- Rohnert Park-Dec.31 s1 - Jan.l st" a) Double Tree Hotel—no event planned b) Community Center— 12/31-1/1 New Years Eve event 300 people (little impact). 2- Santa Rosa—Dec.31s1- Jan. 1s1 - a) Family event Downtown - Dec, 31'1 (1s1 Night— 50,000 people expected). b) Event at the Fairgrounds—Jan 1 s1 (20,000 people expected). 3- Lake County Dec. 31s1—Jan 1s` - a) Konocti —Thousands expected at large party. b) Fairgrounds—Thousands expected at large party. 4- Bay area Dec 28h—Jan 3rd - a) Law enforcement - if requested. b) Hazardous Material Team— if requested The Department of Public Safety pledges to respond to community needs with professional personnel 1 committed to safeguarding the health of our community. This goal will be accomplished through community involvement, education and innovation. Recommendations: This plan is to increase staffing on Thursday, December 30, 1999 and Friday, December 31, 1999; all uniformed personnel will work in patrol providing maximum service to the community. On Saturday, January 1, 2000 staffing will be at seventy five percent above normal. On Sunday, January 2, 2000 staffing will be at twenty five percent above normal. Selected personnel will be available to respond immediately upon request depending on the type of incident involved. The following is the recommendation to provide the proper staffing for this community and our commitment to assist outside agencies: 1. All members of the organization have been advised there would be no routine time off from the 27th of December, 1999 to January 2nd, 2000. The Rohnert Park Public Safety Officers Association has been appraised of this need and there is an understanding about this seven-day period. 2. A third fire engine will be staffed From December 30t to January lst, from 0700- 0200. 3. Detectives, Magnet, DARE, SRO, and COPPS Officers along with Fire Division personnel will work uniform patrol (refer to the attached schedule for times). 4. Dispatch will be staffed with four dispatchers and a supervisor during the critical hours of 1600-0400 hours. 5. Four Community Service Officers will be on duty Thursday, December 30t, 31S', and January 1 S`, two during the hours of 0700-1700 and two during the hours of 1600- 0200. 6. 'Records Personnel will be used as follows; One clerk to work on Saturday, January 1, 2000 to process reports. One typist on Saturday, January 1, 2000, to transcribe reports. The front counter will be staffed on January 1st from 0800-1700 hours. 7. Our Identification Technician will be on duty from 0700-1700 hours Thursday, December 30 and Friday December 31. 8. The Property Clerk will be on duty from 0700-1700 hours Friday, December 31, 1999 and half day Saturday, January 1 St. 9. Command staff(Lieutenants and above) will be on duty and the Mobil Command Vehicle will be staged at the Main Station. 10. All Reserves and PSA's will be utilized when they are able to report for duty. 11. Sgt. Saldanha and Detective Shields will assist with all officer involved critical incident investigations that occur in the North County. Detective Mitchell will assist The Department of Public Safety pledges to respond to community needs with professional personnel 2 committed to safeguarding the health of our community. This goal will be accomplished through community involvement, education and innovation. with all officer involved critical incident investigations that occur in the South County. 12. Two teams of trained personnel have been identified to respond to Haz-Mat incidents in this city and to assist in the county (1 Sgt. 3 PSO's). 13. Two teams of trained personnel have been identified to respond for crowd control in this city and any mutual aid request. (1 Sgt. Three PSO's). 14. Fire personnel who are not on their normal tour will be assigned to patrol from 0700 to 0200 hours or staffing a third engine, in two shifts. (Refer to the attached schedule). 15. The Three COPPS Officers will work uniform patrol from 1100-2100 and 1600-0200 hours. 16. Seven Public Works employees will be on duty for a 24 hour period in 12 hour shifts from 1800-0600 and 0600 to 1800 hours, beginning Friday, December 31, 1999 to Saturday, January 1, 2000. 17. Training Sergeant Lynd will be assigned to Communications 1800-0400 hrs. on December 30 and December 31, 1999. 18. DARE and SRO Officers will work patrol 1600-0200 hours. 19. Crime Prevention Officer Hoagland has been assigned to CSO patrol duties 0700- 1700 hrs. 20. CSO Brannen and CSO Prescott have been assigned to CSO patrol duties 0700-1700 hrs. 21. CSO Littler and Barrow have been assigned to CSO patrol duties 1600-0200 hrs. December 30th to January 1``. 22. Patrol Lt. Thompson has been assigned to Patrol Watch Commander 1600-0200 hrs. December 31g. 23. Admin Sgt. Murray has been assigned to patrol 1600-0200 hrs. December 30th and 31g. 24. Information Services Lt. Frazer has been assigned to patrol 0700-1700 hrs. December 30th and 315' 25. Fire Services Lt. Giesige has been assigned to patrol 0700-1700 hrs. December 30th and 31g. The Department of Public Safety pledges to respond to community needs with professional personnel 3 committed to safeguarding the health of our community. This goal will be accomplished through community involvement, education and innovation. 26. Suuport Services Lt. Kramer has been assigned to patrol 1600-0200 hrs. December 30 and 31st. 27. Comdr. Cassel will be available. 28. Comdr. Bullard will be available. 29. Staffing returns to normal on Monday, January 3, 2000. Attachments: Memo from Sergeant Sweeney Sonoma County Mutual Aid Plan Y2K plan from Santa Rosa Police Department Patrol Schedule and areas of responsibility The Department of Public Safety pledges to respond to community needs with professional personnel 4 committed to safeguarding the health of our community. This goal will be accomplished through community involvement, education and innovation. AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY Thursday December 306I- Dayshift 0700-1700 Sergeant—Sweeney/McNair/Saldanha Jones Beat One Sta.2-Pelton/Reinhold Schwanke Beat Two Sta.4-Fry/Amato Mathis Beat Three 3ra Eng. Lamison/Stager (0700-1700) G. Fahy Beat-One-business areas-Foot Patrol. 3rd Eng. Garretson/Anglin Lawrence/Coats Beat-Two-business areas-Foot Patrol. (1600-0200) Anderson/Adams Beat-Three-business areas-Foot Patrol. Sgt.Welch. 1600-0200 Shields Investigations in uniform Mitchell Investigations in uniform Hac-Mat Team A Dayton Investigations in uniform Sgt. Welch Seyler Investigations in uniform PSO Reinhold PSO Lamison Hoagland Beat One Brannen Beat Two Team B Littler Beat Three Sgt. Marty PSO Vincent Cover Units 1100-2100 hrs. PSO Goldy PSO Ferronato Archibald/Becker Beat One Cover Stubblebine/Corcoran Beat Two Cover Justice/Brown Beat Three Cover Tactical Team A P. Fahy/Taylor Cover-West Side of city Sgt.Rosengren Vincent Traffic PSO P.Fahy PSO Taylor Swing Shift 1600-0200 hrs. PSO Ferry(30t/31st) PSO Luscombe-Alternate Sergeant—Rosengren/Guidet/Murray/Welch/ Team B - Lynd(1800-0400-Dispatch) Sgt.Murray Horton/Bates Beat One PSO Robinson Kennedy/Latorre Beat Two PSO Moore Marquez/Mawson Beat Three PSO Strouse Ferry/Kofler Cover North of RPX PSO Amato Adam Cover South of RPX Prescott South Barrow North Critical Incident Team Sgt. Saldanha Cover Units 1900-0500 hrs. Det. Shields (North County) Robinson/Wagner Commercial areas Det. Mitchell Grave Shift 2100-0700 hrs. (South County) Sergeant Marty Strouse Traffic Moore/Gilson Beat One Luscombe/Nicks/ Beat Two Ferronato/Alban Beat Three AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY December 31st Friday Sta.2-Coats/Adams Dayshift 0700-1700 hrs. Sta.4-Lamaison/Stager e/Frazer 3'" Eng.Pelton/Reinhold Lieutenants—Giesige/ (0700-1700) Sergeants—Sweeney/McNair/Saldanha 3"Eng.Latorre/Horton Anderson Beat One (1600-0200) G. Fahy/Fry Beat Two Sgt. Welch Lawrence/Amato Beat Three Jones Beat One industrial area—foot patrol Schwanke/Shields Beat Two industrial area—foot patrol Mathis/Mitchell Beat Three industrial area—foot patrol Hoagland/Brannen Littler Cover 1100-2100 hrs. Justice Cover North of RPX Becker/Archibald Cover South of RPX Dayton/Seyler Cover industrial in uniform in unmarked vehicle(Banks-Parking Lots of Cinemas etc...). Swings 1600-0200 hrs. Lieutenants—Thompson/Kramer Sergeants—Guidet/Welch/Murray/Rosengren 1900-0500/Lynd-1800-0400 Dispatch Bates/Taylor Beat One Adam/P.Fahy Beat Two Mawson/Marquez Beat Three Kennedy/Garretson Cover Beat Two Commercial-east side Fenry/Kofler Cover Utech/Goldy Unmarked-plain clothes. Prescott South of RPX Barrrow North of RPX DUI—Check Point 2100-0200hrs. Stubblebine/Corcoran Anglin/Vincent Brown/Nicks Strouse Cover 1900-0500 hrs. Robinson/Wagner Cover Graves—2100-0700 hrs. Sergeant Marty Moore/Gilson Beat One Luscombe/Johnson Beat Two Ferronato/Alban Beat Three Strouse/Nicks Cover AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY SATURDAY,JANUARY 1, 2000 DAYSHIFT 0700-1700 HOURS Sergeant Sweeney Anderson Beat One G.Fahy Beat Two Lawrence Beat Three Sta.2-Pelton/Reinhold PSO Cover—Commercial North of RPX Sta.4-Fry/Amato PSO Cover—Commercial South of RPX Third Eng. Prescott 0900-1900 (0700-1700) Justice Cover 1100-2100 hours Third Eng. (1600-0200) SWING SHIFT 1600-0200 HRS Sergeants: Guidetl Rosengren Bates Beat One Adam Beat Two Mawson Beat Three PSO Cover—Commercial North of RPX PSO Cover—Commercial South of RPX CSO Barrow CSO Robinson Cover 1900-0500 hours GRAVE SHIFT 2100-0700 HRS Sergeant: Marty Moore Beat One Luscombe Beat Two Ferronato/Alban Beat Three PSO Cover—Commercial North of RPX PSO Cover—Commercial South of RPX AEARS OF RESPONSIBILITY SUNDAY JANUARY 2, 2000 DAYSHIFT—0700-1700 HRS Sergeant: Sweeney Sta.2-Coats/Adams Anderson Beat One Sta.4-Lamison/Stager G. Fahy Beat Two Lawrence Beat Three PSO Cover CSO COVERSHIFT 1100-2100 Justice SWINGSHIFT 1600-0200 Sergeant: Guidet Bates Beat One Adam Beat Two Mawson Beat Three PSO Cover COVERSHIFT 1900-0500 Robinson GRAVESHIFT 2100-0700 Moore Beat One Luscombe Beat Two Ferronato Beat Three PSO Cover MEMORANDUM To: Joe Netter, City Manager From: Bill Stephens, Public Works Manager Date: December 7, 1999 Subject: Public Works Staffing Regarding Y2K period The Public Works information regarding Y2K staffing will be as follows: • Friday, 12/31/99- Normal holiday staffing would be 1 person on call. Actual will be 1 person on call until 10:00 a.m., then three people on duty until 6:00 p.m. They will have assigned duties, such as litter patrol, park cleanup, etc. • The Public Works Manager will report to the Public Works Corporation Yard at about 3:00 p.m. Monitoring of Y2K activities in New Zealand, Australia, and Asia will begin as soon as information is available. • At 6:00 p.m. two maintenance supervisors and five maintenance workers will report for duty. They will be available as needed for vandalism repair, cleanup, water system operations, sewer system operations, and support for Public Safety. Their shift is scheduled to end at 6:00 a.m., although early release is possible. • Saturday, 1/1/00 - One supervisor and five maintenance workers will report at 6:00 a.m. Their assignments will include street and facility cleanup, vandalism repair,water system operations, and sewer system checks. The shift for this group is scheduled to end at 6:00 p.m., however, they may be released earlier if not required. Vacations for Public Works staff have been severely restricted between 12/27/99 and 1/6/00, ensuring staff availability should an emergency develop. As we discussed in our combined Y2K preparation meeting, fuel facilities will be topped off in the coming weeks, and selected water tank sites have been fitted with fire tanker compatible water connections. 3 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park, California 94928 MEMORANDUM comma X Date By Miscellaneous Connnunications Agenda IV ILi 99 x IgJ 9 6 Copy to: December 8, 1999 Copy to: TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Betsy Strauss RE: Rohnert Park Municipal Code §§ 17.08.110 and 17.34.320: Abandoned Vehicles and On-Street Parking of Recreational Vehicles The City Council asked this office to review the above-referenced sections of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code to determine their compliance with State law. The purpose of this memo is to set forth the results of that review. Section 17.08.110: Inoperative Motor Vehicles --Storage and Repair This section of the Municipal Code has two parts. The first part prohibits storage or repair of an unused, dismantled or inoperative motor vehicle, boat, trailer, trailer coach, airplane, or similar equipment in any front or side yard in any residential district. The second part allows an operative motor vehicle, boat, trailer, trailer coach or other similar equipment that is being regularly used by the resident, to be parked in an area, approved by the city, which has a permanent parking pad provided for such use. The subject matter of the first part of this section is covered by state law. The subject matter of the second part of this section is not covered by state law. The first part of this section is not in compliance with state law. The State Vehicle Code authorizes a city to adopt an ordinance establishing procedures for the abatement and removal, as public nuisances, of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, on inoperative vehicles.' Such an ordinance must contain all of the following provisions: 1 Vehicle Code § 22660. Although Section 17.08.110 does not provide for the abatement and removal of abandoned vehicles, the City's recently adopted nuisance abatement ordinance in conjunction with Section 17.08.110 is not in compliance with the State Vehicle Code. (707) 588-2214lbstrauss@rpcity.org —2 — December 8, 1999 • The requirement that notice be given to the DMV within five days after the date of removal; • Making the ordinance inapplicable to (1) a vehicle that is completely enclosed within a building where it is not visible from the street or other public or private property; or (2) a vehicle that is stored or parked in a lawful manner on private property in connection with the business of a licensed dismantler, licensed vehicle dealer, or a junkyard; • The requirement that not less than a 10-day notice of intention to abate and remove the vehicle thereof as a public nuisance be issued (under some circumstances notice is not required); • The 10-day notice must contain a statement of the hearing rights of the owner of the property on which the vehicle is located and of the owner of the vehicle; • The requirement that a public hearing be held before the City Council upon request of the owner of the vehicle or the property owner; • The requirement that after a vehicle has been removed, it shall not be reconstructed or made operable; • A provision authorizing the owner of the land on which the vehicle is located to appear in person at the hearing or present a sworn written statement denying responsibility for the presence of the vehicle on the land.2 A "wrecked" vehicle is one which is "destroyed, disabled, seriously damaged, crashed or ruined." A "dismantled" vehicle is one which is "in pieces." An "inoperative" vehicle is one which is not mechanically operable for the purpose for which it was originally constructed. Recommendation: Either (1) adopt an ordinance prohibiting the abatement and removal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative vehicles; or (2) adopt an ordinance as authorized by the State Vehicle Code allowing for the abatement and removal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative vehicles. Section 17.34.230: Parking of certain vehicles prohibited - Exceptions This section contains two prohibits. First, it prohibits parking a vehicle which exceeds 4 tons gross unladen vehicle weight or which is more than 25 feet in length or which exceeds eight feet in height on any residential street unless the vehicle can be screened from public view. Second, it prohibits parking a vehicle with those same characteristics on any lot in a residential district unless the vehicle can be screened from public view. Campers, camping and travel trailers and motor homes are exempt from these prohibitions. The subject matter of the first part of this section is covered by state law. The subject matter of the second part of this section is not covered by state law. The first part of this section is not in compliance with state law. 2 Vehicle Code §22661 3 City of Costa Mesa v. Soffer(1994) 11 Cal.App.4th 378,387 footnote 9. 3 — December 8, 1999 The State Vehicle Code allows a city (1) to prohibit or restrict parking between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. and (2) to prohibit or restrict parking of commercial vehicles which exceed 5 tons or more. a The ordinance restricting parking between 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. may provide for a system of permits for the purpose of exempting from the prohibition handicapped persons, residents, and guests of residents of residential areas. Section 10.40.230 of the Municipal Code prohibits parking for longer than 30 minutes between 2 a.m. and 4 a.m. with an exemption for a physician making house calls. Section 10.40.230 is in compliance with the Vehicle Code. The Vehicle Code is preemptive of local authority. This means that a city may not enact an ordinance on any matter covered by the Vehicle Code unless it is expressly authorized. Therefore, Section 17.32.230 as it relates to on-street parking of 4 ton vehicles is not authorized by the Vehicle Code. Recommendation: Adopt an ordinance amending Section 17.34.230 to bring it into conformance with the State Vehicle Code. Review Section 10.40.230 to determine whether any amendments are needed. I hope this memo provides the information the City Council needs to evaluate this subject. Please let me know if you have any questions. c: Joe Netter Pat Rooney Wendie Schulenburg 4 Vehicle Code § 22507.5 ( . FROM:SONOMA CO REG OF VOTER TO: 707 793 7274 SEP 16, 1999 8:29AM 14079 P.05 'onncil: X Date By Z, Miscellaneous Communications ONSOLIDATED PRIMARY ELECTION Agenda (-204.(gi )< oti(9c, ; March 7, 20) opyo 1 py to: Dates To Remember November 15, 1999 to December 10, 1999 E - 113 to E - 88 Period for filing nomination documents for all candidates for the Consolidated Primary Election. Nomination forms for federal, state and county offices may be obtained from the Registrar of Voters office. Candidates must either pay a nonrefundable filing fee or submit sufficient face-value signatures-in-lieu or any combination thereof, prior to the issuance of nomination documents. NOTE: JUDICIAL CANDIDATES are • not required to provide a residential address on any of their nomination documents. E.C. §§8020, 8041 , 8061, 8100, 8105-6 ffø' ° f' VAeaf K�e s December 10, 1999. E - 88 Consolidation Deadline - Last day for any district, other than school districts, to request consolidation and/or placement of a measure on the official ballot for March 7, 2000. E.C. §§10400 et seq, Ed.0 §5342 �► December 10, 1999 E - 88 Notice of election and notice to submit arguments. If there are measures to appear on the ballot, the Registrar of Voters office will send notices to newspapers by this date. g E.C. §9163 December 11, 1999- E - 87 Measure Assignment - The Registrar of Voters office will determine the order of measures to appear on the official ballot. E.C. §§13115-6 • December 11, 1999 thru December 15, 1999 E - 87 to E - 83 Extension Period for filing nomination papers for State Constitutional, Legislative, Judicial, State Insurance Commissioner and local candidates, OTHER THAN THE INCUMBENT. Extensions do not apply where there is no incumbent to be elected or if the incumbent has been term limited. E.C. §§8022(b), 8024, 8204 December 16, 1999 E - 82 Randomized alphabet drawing. Secretary of State and county elections official to conduct the randomized alphabet drawing to determine the order of candidates' names on the official ballot. E.C. §§13112 (B)(l) • FROM:SONOMA CO REG OF DOTER To: 707 793 7274 SEP 16, 1999 8:30AM 4079 P.06 - CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY ELECTION March 7, 2000 Dates To Remember g..\\o't U'�ea sire, December 20, 1999 E - 78 Last day to submit arguments in favor of or arguments against any measure to appear on the ballot for the March 7, 2000 Consolidated Primary Election. If an argument in favor of and an argument against the measure is submitted, the Registrar of Voters office will send copies of the opposing arguments to the authors of the primary arguments and they may submit rebuttal arguments, if desired. Primary arguments may not exceed 300 words in length. NOTE: There is a 10-day public review period following the final date for submission of arguments. E.C. §9163 7 December 30, 1999 E - 68 Last day to submit rebuttal arguments in favor of or against any measure on the June ballot, Rebuttal arguments may not exceed 250 words in length. NOTE: There is a 10-day public review period following the final date for submission of rebuttal arguments. E.C. §9167 December 31, 1999 E - 67 Impartial and/or Fiscal Analysis due to be filed in the office of the Registrar of Voters office no later than 5:00 pm on this date. NOTE: There is a 10- day public review period following the final date for submission of the impartial analysis. E.C. §§9160, 9500 January 10, 2000 February 14, 2000 E - 57 to h; - 14 Tiling period for Statements of Write-in Candidacy and Nomination Papers for any office appearing on the ballot in the Primary election. E.C. §§8601, 8604 January 27, 2000 E - 40 Counties to mail sample ballots to voters including notice of polling place. E.C. §§13303-4 February 7, 2000 E - 29 Registration Closes - Last day to register or re-register to vote in the March 7, 2000 Consolidated Primary Election. E.C. §2102, 2107 Absentee balloting opens - Voters may vote by mail or in person in the Registrar of Voters office. E.C. §3001 et seq CONTEST ID# • CITY CLERK CITY OF ELECTION DATE: MEASURE LETTER DESIGNATION: (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) STATEMENT OF ACCURACY The undersigned author(s) of the (select one of the following) ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ❑ REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ❑ ARGUMENT AGAINST ❑ REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST ❑ (300 words) (250 words) ballot measure at the election Letter Name of election for the being held on 20 Jurisdiction Date of election hereby state that such argument is true and correct to the best of his/her/their knowledge and belief. 1 . 2. Signature and date Signature and date Print/type name as you want it to appear on argument Print/type name as you want it to appear on argument Title to appear below name on argument (optional) Title to appear below name on argument (optional) 3. 4. Signature and date Signature and date Print/type name as you want it to appear on argument Print/type name as you want it to appear on argument Title to appear below name on argument (optional) Title to appear below name on argument (optional) 5. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: Signature and date Print/type name as you want it to appear on argument Name and phone number Title to appear below name on argument (optional) Address OPTIONAL TITLES SHOULD NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) WORDS A ballot argument or rebuttal argument shall not be accepted unless accompanied by the name or names of the person(s) submitting it, or, if submitted on behalf of an organization, the name of the organization and the name of at least one of its principal officers. No more than five signatures shall appear with any argument submitted. Arguments may be changed or withdrawn by their proponents until and including the date fixed by the election official for filing. There is a 10 calendar day review period prior to submitting arguments for printing. E.C. 9283, 9295 Text of arguments/rebuttal arguments should either be typewritten (see reverse side of this form) on the reverse side of this form, or a typewritten or computer generated statement may be attached to this form. Statements are electronically scanned for typesetting, therefore handwritten arguments will not be accepted for filing. ALL ARGUMENTS/REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY THIS FORM SIGNED BY THE AUTHOR(Sl. CONTEST ID# All arguments/rebuttals will be printed in a uniform style, in block paragraph form. Words to be printed in boldface type or all capital letters cannot be accommodated, nor can indentations, circles, stars, dots, bullets, underlines, lists or enumerations Lists or enumerations will be wrapped as a single blocked paragraph. Single line paragraphs are not permitted Alt arguments/rebuttals should be checked by the author for spelling and punctuation, as the department will not edit any material contained therein. ARGUMENT/REBUTTAL MAY BE TYPED OR COMPUTER GENERATED ALL AUTHORS MUST SIGN ON THE REVERSE SIDE Rev. 7/97 BALLOT ARGUMENTS GENERAL INFORMATION 1 . A ballot argument for any county, district or school district measure shall not exceed 300 words in length. E.C. 9162, 9315, 9501 Exception: Ballot arguments to reorganize a school or community college district shall not exceed 500 words. Ed. Code Sec 35758 2. No more than five signatures shall appear with any argument. E.C. 9164, 9501 3. No rebuttal argument shall exceed 250 words in length. E.C. 9167, 9317, 9504 4. Each argument/rebuttal argument shall be accompanied by a statement, to be signed by each author declaring that the argument/rebuttal argument is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief. E.C. 9600 5. Whenever any ballot arguments/rebuttal arguments are submitted, such arguments/rebuttal arguments may be withdrawn by the authors at any time prior to and including the final date fixed for filing arguments/ rebuttal arguments. E.C. 9601 CAMPAIGN STATEMENT FILING REQUIREMENTS California's Political Reform Act was adopted by voter initiative in 1974 and has been periodically amended by legislation and initiatives. The Act requires that campaign disclosure reports provide the public with the identity of contributors and the amounts they give and the amount and purpose of expenditures made by officeholders, candidates, and committees. Proponents and all committees primarily formed to support or oppose a ballot measure in any election must comply with the campaign statement filing requirements if the committee receives contributions or makes independent expenditures that total $1 ,000 or more. Monetary penalties may be assessed for failure to file required statements. Call the Campaign Reporting Section of the City Clerk's office or the Fair Political Practices Commission at 916-322-5662 if you have questions relating to filing requirements or need campaign statement forms. WORD COUNTING GUIDELINES (E.C. Section 9) The guidelines below are used by the Registrar of Voters Office for counting words. 1. The name and office title at the TOP of the form are not counted -- only the text. 2. Punctuation marks are not counted. 3. Each word is counted as one word except as specified below: a) Geographical Names are counted as one (1) word. EXAMPLES: "City and County of San Francisco" "City of Santa Rosa" b) Abbreviations - each abbreviation for a word, phrase, or expression is counted as one (1) word. (i.e., S.R.J.C., etc., CPA are counted as ONE word). c) Hyphenated Words - found in any generally available dictionary are counted as one (1) word. d) Dates - consisting of a combination of words and numbers are counted as two (2) words. (i.e. June 2, 1994 is counted as two words). e) Dates - consisting of only digits are counted as one (1) word. (i.e. 6/2/94 is counted as one word). f) Digital Numbers - are counted as one (1) word (i.e. 100 is counted as one word); g) Written Numbers - are counted as one (1) word EACH (i.e. one hundred is counted as two (2) words). h) Telephone Numbers - are counted as one word. i) Internet Web Site Addresses - are counted as one word. 4. PLEASE PROOFREAD YOUR ARGUMENT/REBUTTAL. This office will not be responsible for the accurate printing of any re-formatted argument/rebuttal, nor will we correct any misspellings, grammar or punctuation. Words in ALL CAPITALS, bold, italics, underlines, ***stars***, ...dots..., lists or enumerations, etc. are prohibited. Lists or enumerations will be wrapped as a single, blocked paragraph. Single line paragraphs are not permitted. Although we prefer that arguments/rebuttals be submitted on our form, we do accept statements which are typewritten (or computer generated) and attached to our form; however, it is extremely important that all pertinent information be included. • CITY OF ROHNERT PARK OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park, California 94928 Council: X Date By MEMORANDUM - Miscellaneous Communications ><R:Agenda l 1 ]� X 1zl9/q to Copy to: December 9, 1999 C opy to: CC : s S� �X T:s6s-6Yv3 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members . Debra.R45so ' J.C So, ea..aClec/io.(S FROM: Betsy Strauss Vic/L. Hi�� • RE: UGB Ballot Measure: Form of Question M �• , " y 4 On November 23, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution 99-249 submitting the UG: Measure to the voters on the March, 2000 ballot. Resolution 99-249 stated that the following question would be submitted to the voters: "Shall Ordinance No. be adopted to amend the General Plan of the City of Rohnert Park to establish a 20 year Urban Growth Boundary?" There has been some opinion voiced, since the adoption of Resolution 99-249, that the question should include more information about the UGB Measure. Vice-Mayor Vicki Vidak-Martinez and Council Member Jake Mackenzie agree that the form of the question should be changed to provide the voters with more information. The purpose of this memo is to present the City Council with several options and recommend that the attached resolution be adopted to change the form of the question. Alternative Questions The underlined material indicates changes from Question No. 1: 1. Shall the voters of Rohnert Park amend the General Plan to add a 20 year Urban Growth Boundary to prevent urban sprawl, preserve agricultural land and open space, and control the amount and rate of growth?" 2. Shall the voters of Rohnert Park amend the General Plan to add a 20 year Urban Growth Boundary to prevent urban sprawl, protect and enhance community separators, preserve agricultural land and open space, and control the amount and rate of growth?"' 1 A member of the public suggested that the underlined language be included. The City Council may wish to consider whether the UGB line, which encroaches into an existing community separator, protects and enhances community separators. (707) 588-2214Ibstrauss@rpcity.org — 2 — December 9, 1999 • 3. Shall the voters of Rohnert Park amend the General Plan to add a 20 year Urban Growth Boundary to prevent urban sprawl, protect and enhance community separators, preserve agricultural land and open space, and control the amount and rate of growth conform to the city's new General Plan and be spread evenly over the 20 year period and that no change can be made to the Urban Growth Boundary measure unless approved by voters?" 4. Shall the voters of Rohnert Park amend the General Plan to add a 20 year Urban Growth Boundary to protect what is unique about Rohnert Park by preventing urban sprawl, preserving agricultural land and open space, and controlling the amount and rate of growth ?" r.- the voters of Rohnert Park amend the General Plan to add a 20 year Urban 4' Growth Boundary to protect what is unique about Rohnert Park by preventing urban sprawl, preserving agricultural land and open space, and promoting efficient and • orderly growth patterns?" The attached resolution would amend Resolution 99-249 and will be completed with the form of the question chosen by the City Council. Thank you for your attention. Please let me know if you have any questions. RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 99-249 RELATING TO THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY BALLOT MEASURE WHEREAS,the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 99-249 calling a special municipal election to be held with the consolidated primary election on March 7, 2000, to submit to the voters of the City an ordinance making amendments to the general plan of the City of Rohnert Park including establishing a 20 year urban growth boundary; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 99-249 submitted the following question to the registered voters of the City of Rohnert Park: "Shall Ordinance No. be adopted to amend the General Plan of the City of Rohnert Park to establish a 20 year Urban Growth Boundary?"; and WHEREAS,the City Council wishes to change the form of the question submitted to the voters of the City of Rohnert Park in order to provide the voters with more information about the Urban Growth Boundary in the text of the question. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park as follows: 1. The first resolve clause of Resolution No. 99-249 is hereby amended to change the text of the question to be submitted to the registered voters of the City of Rohnert Park. 2. The following question shall be submitted to the registered voters of the City of Rohnert Park at the special municipal election called on March 7, 2000: 3. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors,the County Clerk and the elections department of the County of Sonoma. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED by the Rohnert Park City Council this 14a' day of December, 1999. ATTEST: CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DEPUTY CITY CLERK MAYOR Memo To: Joe Netter and General Plan Advisory Committee From: Vicki Hill Date: November 30, 1999 RE: General Plan Budget Items As reported to the Committee on several occasions, there is a need to modify the General Plan budget to accommodate out-of-scope work that has occurred and that will be needed in the next several months. Background The original scope of work for the General Plan (approved by the City Council in January 1999) anticipated a schedule ending in December 1999. The extension of time, as well as expansion of work tasks has resulted in increased costs that were not included in the original budget. Budget augmentation is now needed for the contracts for Dyett and Bhatia, Crane Transportation Group, and myself. These proposed contract amendments are outlined below. The original budget is attached as Exhibit A. The total budget of$389,473 includes a project contingency amount of$32,000. As described below, a portion of this contingency amount ($15,387.96) was incorporated into the Dyett and Bhatia contract. Approximately $16,612 remains in the contingency fund (approved by the City Council in January 1999). Budget Modification Summary The following amounts are requested to complete the General Plan/EIR process. Details of these requests are provided in the following sections of this memo. Dyett and Bhatia: $30,370 (including optional tasks) Crane Transportation Group $ 8,650 Plus Amount to be Determined (see below) Vicki Hill $15 000 TOTAL: 54,020 PLUS AMOUNT TO BE DETERMINED Remaining contingency funds ($16,612) can be applied to this budget modification request, but additional funds need to be authorized to cover the full amount. Dyett and Bhatia Contract The Dyett and Bhatia contract budget for the project was $300,000. This amount does not directly correspond to Exhibit A because: 1) some General Plan and EIR work was performed in 1997 under Dyett and Bhatia's original contract—the budget under that original contract was not fully expended, therefore the budget identified in Exhibit A was added to a residual sum in this original contract amount; and 2) when the contract was amended in January 1999, a contingency amount of 15,387.96 was added to round out the contract to $300,000. 1 , 1 �,� `fLdi' This $300,000 budget is nearly exhausted. As of November 1, 1999, a total of $298,737.19 had been billed. Cost overruns have occurred as a result of: expanded work effort related to developing the preferred land use plan; extended schedule and corresponding additional meetings; and expanded work tasks to include preparation of all new General Plan text; and preparation of the Community Design element (which was not in the original work scope). The contingency amount in the contract has been expended on these extra work efforts, but the contingency is not sufficient to cover all out-of-scope tasks as described below. Preferred Plan Effort. Developing the preferred land use plan extended to June rather than April 1999. A tremendous amount of time was expended on developing and modifying alternatives, analyzing these alternatives, preparing land use plan maps, and revising the land use plan program. Additional Meetings. The Dyett and Bhatia work scope included attendance at 25 meetings. Because of the extended schedule and work effort on the General Plan, as of November 1, 1999, 35 meetings were attended. It is anticipated that an additional 10 meetings and hearings may be necessary prior to March 2000 (including meetings attended in November 1999). General Plan Text. The work program anticipated that text from previous draft elements could be used. It has turned out that virtually all of the elements have had to be drafted from scratch because the land use direction of the Draft General Plan is substantially different from previous land use planning efforts. Additional costs were imposed due to the need to produce multiple iterations of text, as well as deal with growth management issues in extensive detail. Also, the public nature of the Committee deliberations and the need to review and respond to public comments has entailed additional efforts. Community Design Element. At the direction of the Committee, a Community Design Element was prepared. This optional element was not included in the original work scope ($13,700). Requested Budget Modification: A total of$30,370 is requested to augment Dyett and Bhatia's budget to cover out-of-scope tasks already performed and anticipated through February 2000. This request is broken down as follows: Prepgat on of Final General Plan 5 1 0 Optional Desktop Publishing $10,500 Optional Web/CD-ROM version of Plan L$ 7,00J 1 A itional Meetings(10 @ $575/mtg) $ 5,750 Additional Maps/Materials $ 2,000 Total: $30,370* Vl s1/1 4i&1 r.s —> g Sop 2 *NOTE: Eliminating the two optional tasks above would reduce the budget augmentation by $17,500. The budget does not include costs that could result if the Council decides to make major changes to the Plan upon completion of hearings. Crane Transportation Contract Crane Transportation Group has billed the full amount allowable under their current contract with the City($14,300). Cost Overruns. Cost overruns have occurred during EIR preparation for the following reasons: • Changes in alternatives and preferred land use plan that required adjustment to the model; • Changes to text and tables due to the City's decision to require LOS C as the acceptable level of service. • Assistance to Dyett and Bhatia in determining fuel consumption levels. (This assistance was requested after CTG provided air quality information they were contracted to provide.) Ongoing Consultation. Consultation has been required with City and County staff, in regard to traffic concerns and issues. Also, attendance at several agency meetings has been required and more consultation will be necessary as we work out the traffic issues. Response to Comments. The original contract provided 8 hours for response to comments. Given the traffic concerns that have been expressed and the need to respond to these concerns, a substantial effort will be needed to prepare appropriate responses. This level of effort cannot be determined until the City decides what additional modeling and analysis (if any) is necessary to address EIR comments. Requested Budget Modification: Cost Overruns $2,990. Ongoing Consultation $5,660 Response to Comments T Total (without RTC): $8,650. Vicki Hill Contract My budget of$46,200 (based on an eleven-month process), was exhausted as of November 1999. Added costs are associated with the extensive work effort required on the EIR and General Plan prior to its release in October and for project coordination tasks for the remainder of the General Plan process(December, January, and February). Requested Budget Modification: ($15,000) 3 General Plan Revision - Cost Summary Table Consultant/Component Cost Dyett and Bhatia - General Plan Tasks (Exhibit A) General Plan (Part A Work Tasks) $102,740 Direct Costs (large scale color maps) 3,050 Meetings (total of 25) 16,925 Total: 122,715 Optional Fiscal Model &Evaluation (Mundie &Associates) 23,000 Optional Fiscal Model &Evaluation Support(D and B) 1,500 Optional Desktop Publishing(DTP) for General Plan 10,500 Optional Web/CD-ROM (provided DTP is done) 7,000 Options Total: 42,000 D & B Total: 164,715 Rick Brown/The Results Group - Public Participation/Facilitation (Exhibit B) Public Participation- all tasks 83,000 Vicki Hill Project Coordination (1.75 days/wk for 11 months) _ 46,200 Other Direct Costs* Meeting Expenses (notices, handouts, food) 10,000 Document Production (reports, draft and final plan) 20,000 Work Plan Total (including options) $323,915 Dyett and Bhatia- Additional General Plan EIR Costs (Attachment 3) Revised Project Description, Updated Setting, and Revised 9,500 Alternatives Analysis Wetlands Mapping (if needed) 5,000 General Plan Revision and Additional EIR Total 338,415 Contingency Amount (10 % of Work Plan Total) 32,000 -- *Note: Document production costs are based on the following estimates: 500 copies Fact Sheets/Issue Summaries and Data Feedback Report, 300 copies Alternatives, 50 copies Alternatives Report, 25 copies Preferred Plan, 20 copies Preferred Plan Report, 200 copies Draft and Final General Plan. Consultant Costs Expended to Date on Current General Plan Process* Dyett and Bhatia $5,377. Rick Brown 8,544. Vicki Hill 5,137. Total: $19,058. * Costs incurred between September 8 and December 31, 1998 during initial start-up of the General Plan revision process. These costs are not included in the work plan budget shown in the Cost Summary Table. Total General Plan Revision Budget Work Plan, Optional Tasks, Additional EIR Costs, Contingency, and $389,473 Costs Expended to Date ' COMMUNITY DEVet:OPMENT COMMISSIOtittifIHE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT Department: Executive Director's Office City Clerk Use Only Meeting Date Held Until Submitted By: Carl Eric Leivo 12/14/99 /_/_ Assistant City Manager Item Number Item Number Agenda Title: December 1, 1999 Election of Housing Financing Authority Resident Board Member Date of Action: _/ / Deadline Date for Commission Action: / / Requested City Council Action: Motion to approve the appointment of Patrick Reymond as Resident Representative for the Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park on the Housing Financing Authority Board. Summary: An election was held in the Clubhouse of the Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park, 607 Redwood Drive, Rohnert Park, California on December 1, 1999, from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Ballots were counted by City Staff and Resident Manager with two witnesses in attendance. A total of twenty-five (25) votes were cast, twenty-two in favor of Patrick Reymond to sit on the Housing Financing Authority Board for a 2-year term. EXECUTIVE 91RECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION: ( )Consent Item ( egular Item (vrApproval ( )Public Hearing Required ( )Not Recommended ( )Submitted with Comment ( olicy Determination by Commission ( )Comments: Executive Director's Signature: 0 [1`APV/1Date:, 4 v G -==(City Clerk Use Only) Commission Action(If Other than Requested) Vote: \\PINNAC LE\MXFLLER$\HFA-R ohnertPark\Elect9 9.121SR99 1 2 1 4.doc a City of Council: X -Dote BY NOV 1 11999 ROHNERT Miscellaneous . ` // Communications X H112,�'14 $' .� Ad CITY OF 3 L n 6041 Agenda Pre 1e 1 l . ; X ROHNERT PARK s 3 Copy to: t' ivn 1 r copy to: M.W4 I h r X' ( _ . �' FLrE : Coti...►�:ss,c,vs�Pe�d� Aetrm s f u,-. Fact Sheet for City Council Appointments to ' `�-- ` ,, Commissions. Boards, or Committees DATE: City Council _ NAME:,41/2%« /1epo'€; r-,c Residence Telephone #: 767 - SS-�G-yz James J. Reilly,Jr. Mayor Address: /5:5-rnA6/2 i67 1Z SE Business Telephone #: S /3-2� Vicki Vidak- Employer:/fJ9J/-2we- -7/1..4%Ls Address: Z/51Q L m2 Martinez Vice Mayor Type of Business:S/1/ae c/1W<'cr S Armando F. Flores Specific work performed: SA/e Jake Mackenzie �4`') Linda Spiro Year graduated from high school: 9 Va Degrees: /2 Councilmembers Are you a current registered voter in Rohnert Park? Comes CI No Year you became a Rohnert Park resident: /9 ' Joseph D. Netter Ajt�/C/�cu 6�r' Z !i(/�,7AZonc�r.7 1�.9r��Li City Manager List activities in cllubs,// __associations, etc.: "-/ X es.,eYPi�L� .47 S'So c-,z rr fr c<J TO WHICH BODY DO YOU PREFER APPOINTMENT? (Commission, Board or Committee) HOUSING FINANCING AUTHORITY BOARD Indicate reasons for your interest in appointment: - ,4ivve «'di A f'-n -4t-',- ,e7-- f4 C /Z.A /LIDS/cr�,77/s A S'Soe"/04L.0s•-) 60! SGetCir S /t/ce Cf _.,- !/__ ---1E, 1g;v-r�S G/1), h 7H'S yoP''�CL� PP://,' �/ (-d/t . iegg t� / ,Q!/�v�fi`z /mile Z;e�t 7-- �/-;e / 4s 7-'e/Z-��1�Y'/ai 1 -- Please provide any additional information, qualifications, and/or references if you so desire. You may use other side of this form. (Form approved by City Council-3/5/75) / c� 1I& Si ature PLEASE RETURN TO CLUB HOUSE OFFICE 6750 Commerce Boulevard • Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486 • (707) 588-2226 • Fax (707) 588-2274 Council: x Date 1,By, Miscellaneous Communications �m. 1 041g9 1L/9/t £B CITY OF ROHNERT ►l�bela OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNIop toe 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park,California 94928 MEMORANDUM November 29, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Betsy Straus"' RE: Proposition 2: March, 2000 Ballot At the City Council meeting of November 23, 1999, the City Council requested additional information on Proposition 22, an initiative measure appearing on the March, 2000 general election ballot. Proposition 22 is referred to as the "Knight Initiative" in reference to State Senator Pete Knight. The initiative contains two sections: Section 1: This Act may be cited as the "California Defense of Marriage Act." Section 2: Section 308.5 is added to the Family Code to read: Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. As you are aware, the State Attorney General is given the responsibility of writing a title and summary for each statewide ballot measure. The summary of the measure has not yet been written. However, the title (on the ballot) will be "Limits on Marriage Initiative." The State law now provides in Family Code 300: "Marriage is a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between a man and a woman, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary. Consent alone does not constitute marriage. Consent must be followed by the issuance of a license and solemnization as authorized by this division...." Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information. c: Maddy Hirschfield Joe Netter (707) 588-2214 I bstrauss@rpcity.org No on Knight-Sonoma County P.O Box 8218 ♦ Santa Rosa, CA 94507 Phone 707-544-8773♦ Fax 707-569-0972 ♦ Email 11 . • i • si - a) - • • ma COUNCIL: November 6, 1999 RECEIVED MISCELLANEOUS q4 Mayor Jim ReillyOMMUNICATIONS _ , 6750 Commerce Blvd. NOV� - 8 1999 AGENDA I .)3 tic( / , Rohnert Park, CA 9492 CITY OF COPY T0: U ROHNERT PARK COPY TO: Dear Mayor Reilly: e•I5 a-f,ve.. - /r's, I am writing to request the written endorsement of the Rohnert Park City Council for the campaign to defeat the Knight Initiative-Proposition 22, on the ballot in March, 2000. I and other fair-minded Californians are working very hard against this unfair, divisive, and intrusive piece of legislation. The Knight Initiative targets one sector of our population and threatens their rights and responsibilities, it increases the rhetoric of hate and intolerance toward gay and lesbian Californians and their families, and introduces government intrusion into private lives and choices. The Knight Initiative claims it will outlaw same-sex marriage and protect the "traditional family" while same-sex marriage is already illegal in the state of California. Currently the divorce rate is 50%. Issues such as spousal abuse and child abuse exist at alarming rates. These and many other social and economic issues we currently face pose real threats to the so called "traditional family" — much more so than two people in a loving relationship. That being said, one has to wonder why we're spending our time, energy and resources making something illegal, that is in fact already so. Passage of this law will not strengthen one single Californian family and in fact threatens many committed families currently living here. Its passage would only stand to cost California taxpayers a great deal of unnecessary money being tied up in the court system like so many other divisive initiatives before it. The No on Knight=erop_22 Campaign is.supported by a host of fair-minded legislators 116 dp notnecessarily support_sam_e-sex marriage such as two candidates for United States President, Al Gore and Bill Bradley as well as Republican Congressman Tom Campbell. People from all walks of life are coming together against the Knight Initiative- Prop 22 because they realize it's not a "gay' issue or even a "marriage" issue but rather an issue for all those who care about fairness and equality. No matter how one feels about marriage, one thing we all can agree upon is that the Knight Initiative-Prop 22 is not good for California. The No on Knight-Prop 22 Campaign also has the full support of U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein, Congress Members Mike Thompson and Lynn Woolsey, Senators John Burton and Wesley Chesbro, and Assembly Members Virginia Strom- Martin, Pat Wiggins, and Kerry Mazzoni. Literally every state and federal elected official in both Sonoma and Marin Counties has endorsed the No on Knight Campaign. Please join them and many other fair-minded Californians in our fight to defeat an initiative that will only hurt California and divide its citizens. We must stand together and stop fanning the flames of hatred and intolerance and keep discrimination from being written into California law. I humbly request and welcome the opportunity to come before the council to present this issue and discuss it further. Please feel free to call me at my home at 707-829-5656. Thank you so much for your time and for all you do in the interest of the citizens of Rohnert Park. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, 4,6, Maddy irshfield Head of Public Relations & Outreach cc: Council Members: Flores, Mackenzie, Spiro, &Vidak-Martinez L U U) O coo C U o co CV 0 U) a p O) a) c) � U 1' � �" o - n- c o a - o 0 10a cF (° ai o ono a) Z 0) � N > Q co N N o 0 N < I v W Y E a 0 o W U Q c 0 o• cz 111 U cc ill W cc x � ao F x •ti,] CC r ' L • ALcd L VLl ►✓l @ r1/23/99 Co-,-.-e G iv/.4 guncil: X Date By � • Miscellaneous 2...got ,-.0'4, `�',,`� - Communications Parent S eakout ,,% Agenda _ `i p )py to: C— 9i' >py to: Would.you like to have your voice-heard :gin-a :major planning.process - 'for how .soma County's Prop. 10 Funds. bnd be sl nt to meet the local_needs of young children? - once and Speak Outs Please come to.-a Parent°Speakout in your local arm -, and tell us what you think is-important`for'children. l e need to hear-your voice: Spanish Language: i a station Piro Food Will Be Served. Times & Places December 2, 1999 — 7:00 - 9:00 Richard Crane Elementary School Child Care Provided. 1290 Southwest Boulevard Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Prop 10 funds are generated by an additional 50 cents per pack on cigarettes passed by California voters last year. These funds will be used to help promote programs for children from birth to five years old. Parent Speakouts are sponsored by the Community Advisory Committee of the SONOMA COUNTY CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST (PROP. 10) COMMISSION. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL 707-591-0170. • • Digannos, Padres zQuisiera I d. Expresar su opinion en un proceso importante acerca de como se debe usar los fondos de la Proposition 10 alocados al Condado de Sonoma para mejor satisfacer las necesidades de ninos locales? s 3' g•Ven a -di anon! g ;Porfavor de venir a una junta de Digannos, Padres ' en su-area local para decirnos que piensa es lo mas importante para los ninos ;Necesitamos oir su voz! interpretacion en espaitoi Sirviran bocaditos - Habra cuidado Para los ninos • i .,. M w '^•��TG.v�^�'yrF�.a.r'1' �Cy'N,K� 2 deciembre 1999, 7:00 a 9:00 p.m. Escuela Elementaria Richard Crane 1290 Southwest Boulevard Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Los fondos de 1a Proposition 10 se originan de un impuesto adicional de 50 centavos por paquete de cigarros que pasaron los votantes de California el ano pasado. Estoas fondos se usaran para promocionar programas para ninos de recien nacidos hasta los cinco anos. Las juntas de DiGANNOS, Padres estan patrocinados por el Comite de Consejo de la Comunidad (Community Advisory Committee) de la COMISION PARA NINOS Y FAMILIAS PRIMER() (Prop. 10) DEL CONDADO DE SONOMA. Para mr s information, hable a 707-591-0170 •i `City of R O H N E R T December 6 1999COUNCIL: K VA- MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS Ms. Barbara Graves AGENDA Sonoma County Children and Families First COPY TO: 1030 Center Drive, Suite C COPY TO: Santa Rosa, CA 95403 ` City Council James J. Reilly,Jr. Dear Barbara: Mayor Thank you for sending staff to conduct Rohnert Park's Parent Speakout meeting Vicki Vidak- Martinez December 2, 1999. They did a great job and their presence was much appreciated Vice Mayor by everyone. Twenty-three people attended the meeting, including the City Armando F. Flores Manager, a School Board Trustee, the City's Recreation Director, a Recreation Jake Mackenzie Commissioner, and several staff from local non-profit organizations. We had Linda Spiro Headstart parents, parents of children with disabilities, and parents who responded Councilmembers to our local publicity efforts. It was a great mix of folks. Joseph D. Netter Ideas and resources were shared, as well as some sobering and tearful personal City Manager stories. Our goal was to bring the community together to respond to the request for input from the Children and Families First Commission. I'm glad the under- privileged were included in this process because it gave others a chance to hear directly their hopes and concerns which may result in local services better attuned to their needs. As you know, this Speakout occurred as a result of community cooperation and the desire of local residents to share in the County's outreach efforts. The meeting room and child care facility was provided by the Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District. The City of Rohnert Park provided two thousand flyers which were distributed by the City, School District, and the Early Learning Institute, which even had people distributing flyers in front of local grocery stores. The Early Learning Institute sent press releases to local media, arranged for child care, and secured donations of refreshments from local businesses. County Health Services provided facilitation and gift certificates for parent participants. This was a partnership effort all of us can be proud of. Again, thank you for your assistance. We look forward to working with you in the future. Sinc ely, \ Vicki Vidak-Martinez Oh if 6.. leo( Vice-Mayor /►_ � �,.(�y�Q'� VVM:tcd . " ";0 cc: Supervisor Mike Reilly 6750 Commerce Boulevard • Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486 • (707) 588-2226 • Fax (707) 588-2274 City of ROHNERT K December 2, 1999 r s Children and Families First Commission Attn: Mike Reilly, Chairman 575 Administration Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95403 City Council James J. Reilly,Jr. Dear Chairman Reilly: Mayor Vicki Vidak- Congratulations on the progress made by the Commission and its Community Martinez Advisory Committees toward completion of our Sonoma County Strategic Plan. Vice Mayor Recently we have become concerned that our city may be getting less recognition Armando F.Flores than it deserves. With 40,000 residents and the second largest school district in Jake Mackenzie Sonoma County, Rohnert Park accounts for a significant portion of county Linda Spiro Councilmembers population. Add in our neighbor, the City of Cotati, and our combined population increases to about 50,000. Joseph D. Netter We believe that the cities of Rohnert.Park and Cotati should receive consideration City Manager commensurate with the size and needs of our population. Our citizens should have the same opportunities to participate in Commission activities as those of other areas. We sincerely hope that our community will be accorded the same attention and support extended to other Sonoma County cities. The Rohnert Park City Council reviewed these comments at its meeting of November 23, 1999. To insure a better future for our children, Rohnert Park looks forward to working cooperatively with the Commission. Best wishes, CITY OF ROHNERT PARK ames J. Re>t , Jr. Mayor cc: City of Cotati Councilmembers City of Rohnert Park Councilmembers Joseph D. Netter, City Manager Michael Harrow,Finance Director Tim Smith, Board of Supervisors/County of Sonoma Mike Kerns, Board of Supervisors/County of Sonoma Michelle Rogers, Executive Director/Early Learning Institute FILE - Sonoma County Children&Families First (Prop. 10) Commission JH-h:Council Agenda Action/112399 Children-Families First(Prop.10)Commission 6750 Commerce Boulevard • Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486 • (707) 588-2226 • Fax (707) 588-2274 ai Netter, Joseph I y �` l �S I / From: Stephens, Bill Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 12:07 PM To: Netter, Joseph Subject: Pedestrian Time in Crosswalks Joe - I checked with Joe Gaffney regarding the time that pedestrians have to cross the street. He forwarded the following information: The standard timing for a pedestrian crossing signal, per the Caltrans Traffic Manual is: • 4 to 7 seconds of green "Walk." The determinantion is made based on the expected volume of pedestrians that will be waiting at the beginning of the cycle. • The timing of the flashing "Don't Walk" is based on the width of the street. I measure the distance from the curb to the lane line for the far right lane, and divide by 4 feet per second. The ped still has the 5 seconds of yellow and 1 second of all-red to make it to the far sidewalk before the opposing phase goes green. We occasionally get complaints, mostly from seniors, about the flashing red "Don't Walk" coming on before they are all the way across the street. This is an educational problem, not a design issue. In cases before, after I have explained to the caller that it's OK to continue walking during the flashing "Don't Walk,"they have understood and are satisfied. I have never seen the countdown timers on the ped signals in Reno (I was just there early this month), and I would strongly advise against installing a device that is not approved by the State of California. Ditto with the double buttons. Since ped buttons are a high maintenance item on a signal, a failed button will lead to unused ped crossing time, and, hence, wasted intersection cycle time. One interesting bit of information from Joe G. is that pedestrians need to be able to transit the area at about 4 feet per second, or risk not making it across before the opposite traffic light turns green for vehicles. This is actually a fairly slow pace. Joe suggests that the countdown timers used in Reno and the idea for double buttons are not approved by the State of California. It looks like the only option would be to increase the intersection cycle time which would increase traffic problems. Thanks, Bill Council: X Date By Miscellaneous Communications Agenda 12J1�{�°1`1 , ,1-2-)'I fi [.B Copy to: Copy to: _ • • 1 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK '-`1 F S K tCEI V EI) 707-585-6700 'O'`---CCCNNN" e,cm,'i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING , D "�� - 3 1999 on Proposed Refuse Collection Rate Increase /,4 t C/ CITY of ` „ -/t Date of Public Hearing:T?ar,r. Tuesday,January 25,2000 1 U� //�`/"�� Time: At or after 6:00 PM U / G� Place: City Council Chambers,City Hall /f��)`LI3l/ 6750 Commerce Boulevard,Rohnert Park /Ui Subject Proposed 4.84%Refuse Collection Rate Increase This notice was sent to all City of Rohnert Park refuse collection customers and to all owners of property which receive City refuse collection service. At•the public hearing on January 25,2000,the City Council will consider a proposed increase in refuse collection rates of 4.84%, A ��� effective March 1,2000 for residential customers and February 1,2000 for commercial customers. The increase is due to an approved formula I I"1 that is part of a negotiated contract with Empire Waste Management that is as follows for 2000: Component Component Rate Council: X Date By Weighting Increase Increase Miscellaneous Consumer Price Index 55% 4.1% 2.26% Communications Disposal(County landfill 25% 10.3% 2.58% Agenda(a..j(t.(CM ? . ( Ip9 US charges) 2000 Rate Increase Amount 4.84% Copy to: Copy to: The following is a comparison of the current and proposed refuse collection rates. Residential rates are composed of automated 35,60 or 90 gallon containers,90 gallon automated yard waste containers and 3 recycling bins. Commercial rates are either automated 35,60 or 90 gallon containers or large bins ranging from 1 1/2 yards to 6 yards with varying frequency of pickup service. Customer Impact(monthly)of a 4.84%Refuse Collection Rate Increase: Current Current Monthly Amt. Amount of Bi-Monthly Monthly With 4.84% Monthly Charges Charges Increase Increase Residential: 90 gallon automated $38.10 $19.05 $19.95 $0.90 60 gallon automated $24.80 $12.40 $13.00 0.60 35 gallon automated $19.10 $ 9.55 $10.00 0.45 Additional 90 gallon $38.10 $19.05 $19.95 0.90 Extra garbage(35 and 60 gal) $3.50/Pick up $ 3.65 0.15 Putting garbage in yard waste $3.50/Pick up $ 3.65 0.15 container Commercial: 90 gallon $38.10 $19.05 $19.95 0.90 60 gallon $24.80 $12.40 $13.00 0.60 35 gallon $19.10 $ 9.55 $10.00 0.45 Mobile Home Parks: Family $19.10 $ 9.55 $10.00 0.45 Adults only $15.70 $ 7.85 $ 8.20 0.35 Commercial bin service: 1-1/2 yards 1 per week 180.10 $90.05 $94.40 4.35 2 yards 1 per week 235.90 117.95 123.65 5.70 3 yards 1 per week 338.50 169.25 177.40 8.15 2 per week 499.80 249.90 262.00 12.10 4 per week 819.60 409.80 429.60 19.80 5 per week 981.00 490.50 514.20 23.70 6 per week 1,145.40 572.70 600.40 27.70 4 yards 1 per week 400.50 200.25 209.95 9.70 2 per week 617.70 308.85 323.80 14.95 3 per week 819.60 409.80 429.60 19.80 4 per week 1,033.90 516.95 541.95 25.00 5 per week 1,241.80 620.90 650.95 30.05 6 per week 1,443.50 721.75 756.65 34.90 6 yards I per week 465.80 232.90 244.15 11.25 2 per week 773.10 386.55 405.25 18.70 3 per week 1,009.00 504.50 528.90 24.40 4 per week 1,282.20 641.10 672.10 31.00 5 per week 1,552.10 776.05 813.60 37.55 6 per week 1,825.40 912.70 956.85 44.15 All owners of property receiving City refuse collection,all City refuse collection customers, and interested persons are invited to attend the public hearing and be heard on the proposed increase in refuse collection rates. Owners of property receiving City refuse collection services may protest the changes in writing,filed with the City Clerk before or during the public hearing. The protest must be signed by the property owner and must include the assessor's parcel number(s)or street address(es)of the property(ies). The mailing address is City Clerk,PO Box 1489,Rohnert Park,CA 94927. Before the hearing,protests may be delivered to the City Clerk's office. A listing of the proposed changes will be published in the Community Voice on Wednesday,December 17, 1999. Copies of the changes are also available at the City Clerk's Office,6750 Commerce Boulevard,Rohnert Park,CA 94928. For questions regarding refuse collection rates, call(707)585-6700. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Council: X Date By Finance Department Miecellaneons 5-.1 IvE ' P.O. Box 1489 Communications 1999 Rohnert Park, California 94928 Agenda i;./L,fA6.-/ ) i.=rf/ t'- \;V Telephone (707) 585-6700 Copy to: (;1 (1* Copy to: 'FtCrN.NEP'T PP+RK December 3, 1999 Mr. Tom Terra Mountain Shadows Golf Resort 100 Golf Course Drive Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Re: COLA Adjustment for "Resident" Rates for 2000 Dear Tom: It's time again for the annual COLA adjustment to the "resident" rates charged at the Mountain Shadows Golf Courses. Attached to this letter is a copy of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for the year ending August 31 , 1999. Please note that the "Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, All Items Index" increased by 4.50% for the year ending August 31, 1999. Your lease agreement with the City allows for an annual adjustment of 75% of the cost of living increase, but not to exceed 5% per year. Thus, based on the aforementioned cost of living information, "resident" rates may be increased by 3.38% (i.e. 4.50% X .75 = 3.38%). Attached is a summary of the 2000 rates based on the calculations provided for in the lease agreement. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Wishing you and your staff the best for this holiday season. Very truly yours, CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Michael L. Harrow Finance Director/City Treasurer /c: City Manager Netter MOUNTAIN SHADOWS GOLF RESORT CALCULATION OF 2000 RATES PER LEASE AGREEMENT CPI Increase : 4 . 50% (See attached) Increase allowed per agreement : 4 . 50% X . 75 = 3 . 38% DAILY RATES 1999 2000 1999 2000 RATES RATES RATES RATES NORTH NORTH SOUTH SOUTH WEEKDAYS $9 . 45 $9 . 75 $6 . 65 $6 . 90 Twilight 3 : 00 p.m. (Apr - Oct) 6 . 65 6 . 90 6 . 65 6 . 90 1 : 00 p.m. (Nov - Mar) 6 . 65 6 . 90 6 . 65 6 . 90 WEEKENDS (includes holidays) 13 . 55 14 . 00 10 . 70 11 . 05 Twilight 3 : 00 p.m. (Apr - Oct) 6 . 65 6 . 90 6 . 65 6 . 90 1 : 00 p.m. (Nov - Mar) 6 . 65 6 . 90 6 . 65 6 . 90 SENIOR CITIZENS (62 and older) 7 . 95 8 . 20 5 .40 5 . 60 9-hole rate (Apr - Mar) 4 . 15 4 . 30 4 . 15 4 . 30 ANNUAL PLAYING PASSES 1999 Rates 2000 Rates Single Unlimited - both courses $825 . 75 $853 . 50 Additional family member 192 . 30 198 . 80 Single Unlimited - weekday only 575 . 65 595 . 10 Additional family member 137 .30 142 . 00 Weekday only South Course 450 . 35 465 . 60 CART RATES Motorized Carts (18 holes) 19 . 00 19 . 65 ( 9 holes) 9 .45 9 . 75 Private Carts Use fee-daily fee 9 .20 9 . 50 Calendar Year Rate 446 . 60 461 . 70 Calendar Year Senior Rate 306 . 25 316 . 60 OTHER RATES Range Balls - small bucket 2 . 05 2 .10 - large bucket 3 . 25 3 . 35 . „ DVat-MU Vf Lr(DV1\ J4(111 Jl IL..) 4.4 LJ) <J/ J-`!J0i 1G-VJ-:7.7 1V VJd rGCJ,@ VJ of • O O Q u-i to N CO N N N- co N- C? 4 to - C1 co r)on co fD 4 CO N OD N C 00 O t-'m LC,r 4n O CJ LC. 4 r- N r O CD00 OODC7r` CD 46 un co co T(0c Nti (C Nr` Ct I() NCM4U74 4 Crir ,- N NC')C.i 1 N-1 Li- < n00 r- CC O)66 rrCJM m4444 U)U) (D .- r Qn r r . . . . . r r- r . 2il as • D u- m(D 4D to 7 CO1 O rti un r n CO(D COCA r CO c0 CO (Dr C_ 4 n U1 CD 00 OD u7 J- 4 U')cc, -- ui c5(D N t` 4'r. Cn m6m or r.jCrj 4 <ilii C) C"i C. r r Nmr.j • ?ry= CD CD rrNNCI CO ea 444 4')U7 (D Z r r r r z Q f-u_ r 0 r 0 4 N 01 r CD D CO (O O L()N CC1 on t` m 4 cn -S un N r CO CO o Gi CV M(fiJ CV r` Om OD < Crl v CT• 40 CC) DO n- c NCV clri on sirnonr6 - 66c W r Q CDC) r r r- N N m CO 4 4 4 U7 Ul D(D i , , y u) = r-r- ti ' (t '' r, x O V',T U W N O r C (C)(AD CD n 4 Ul(D Cr. CV PI 1, 4 co r 4 ti 41 I- 4 M OD r C7 ti r C' NI CO N C -- C)co on .- r- •Cv v i i c Lb �LO O un 6 O Lb 'co -6 0.i ti 4' M1 Ci C7 C)C) 4'Ci V un Ci -L 1 e'i un 6 C'i .- r r CV V' C.i 'C) .. > N.- CC C) C' O O O r- r- CJ N M m V 444 U) U) (D ;C ' r G -, 3 m CJCJ C co m O S OD (D CI) v 5 > CV r 4 rs. r CO O CO CD NIA 'CZ b 0 (D Ci OD 6 un C-Ci se: 4) .f -e lA C7 r .- - N C i• . v r (N CV CI r . . . . . .C) r r I)J 2. 6 a.,' u O r- 'I'' CD r 0", CD Onr.,- co CD CO r_ CC CO Cc. CD CD co in -4- i V(T1 Um CDC) r O co CD D CDLn .a r- M �'rk 4 N N. C 0.) 1� U N m r- CO Or 4 C^� N C'7 (p 76 tom- 'J to N- C' C cr C) r `O f- r- •'C (D C7 r•)r' 4 U ni r-i r• r (V r'j M CV c a Q r, 00 cn on C)OO r- r- N N •:1 m v O 4 U) (i)IA co N r r `u G C r r S ixs i o •Q w u .' 4 r- C.1) Ol oD 4 r O m (0 C7 r- 4 CO CO JC C1 CD 4C' r- 1 L1. 0 'n U w L6 N r-: v f� on 6 V -S a u, o 6 .- r CJ N C1 '7 0 r- (NI � � r � �r) LC)111 H (h :CO I L Z r LLi OJT 1 G'zi a. • 1G ` • ,.+ Q m� 1LO CO CO m4OO (.D MC1(AOC Cl CD Orm Or r-O;V O N4 C rIl' 11.1N C74 cn cn cc. r- NJUn IAM C) trn i'� Z' O 1 (- CJNC' C4T7 cr m G 6 4 CD N m M `- Q �6 6 {A(D O C 4"i '2 LC C N-N N m V (i) M M N N C.j r- r,j C6 r J .J _ �' C r r r r - rr- rrrr,c Ps 1M r r J 4 O V.. 00 a; n •- 4 (D Cn 0)cr (e Ps CO r•_ r c )- nt�4m c4rUDm 4lA ps... OO -J 'u 4Uim Cj6 N r- r NN I "3 - .-CV CDOeletet C'1ti ...1 O CV LO CD -D r T N CO 4 Ill lf) t 1 �. C L) u I CC CZ Z io Th . tU C. CC c w Nm r- '^ rUD?1 O00(D Ps CD C7 Ot`CO C)O1sm'' co CO IA t un on on r- 4IAr rN (D CV Ps CV Ps Cr • a V Ll' U z O O M OD on f� r 4 6 un J La O 4'un T N f� CD:= U•1 O O r 1A 4 C.j•,j R ur < 4 or C`I r CV CV N C7 4 8 z-- -4 Ps OD CO an01CDCD rr . Non m V 444 U1Ul CO r r..r- 't u n Q ' r r ) l Op -0 D' mtv r-, an [T7 co r U6rO O ([,pO NfTiM CO CT 4 O'1O N.lC) .r�i u ^i co l^ !',j m 4 ' et et Umj{A . :f,Cl ('l C7 !'"1 O CV fV CV ex C r- > OD C b G c v 4„ . J ^ ts CD CO CO N. et CO CO U N COOO CO4 cnti CO CO!V O is CO CDC_' ,- ,- 4CO C' -.1- CD N. ,.0 (JD N. CJ4 O C O h Cr co 6R DCV r-- O) mt�v •T C 6sr un6 CDOOIC co rCT r- ur4 rJ 4 CM Unet on si on 6(V - m CJ un IU W .4 Ci' r. COOT. CA00 Or .-NN CO co 44T lA tll CO D, r r I 1) U 'J r r r r - r co y .4 S cocnLOCD is CO OD DC7 Ps CV Iv IA ri ll' 4C1 xMM ND �" cC '-� T T 4 V C'7L)fD p((pp . ;U 4 lr.m <M .^Jr (V r-CO I CJ CO Q 4' 'R IC)If1 iZ os, 'm 1 O 0 CO r CO C) CO• IC' 4 un m 4 0 C) N U7 r UO O CO 4J O CO N.I?' 4 0 tom- CO r 0 D 0) r co C1 CP 4 N CD CO 47 O O CO I r, l.L CD CO C) LC D C) ,- C.j,--CV co c oh m M?CD O U)�tinCO n [Tj N un un (") r lf� ,t v on ^'] - (ti -r^ on CD ,�,, CD t` CO 7 CI O O r r r N N CO On 4 4 4 117 ttt..�� r r 0 007 Z CO Ian cr. 0 4 CV CD CD (0 4 m LC)CO00 D m A O m N IA r ' C C IQ Q r t`(V ti ((A� cc r')0 CO p'Q 4) (J? -r M co CV C) Cs] .-CV O G N. • rrN MC"i444 Ill1A L 1'� r r D CO p N 1 R t7e r 1 X i r,) 0. Q cnO Nm4to CO NCOCTO NC74U) CDt'OVCI, co Nm4L: Dti CD CO CD CVCIC• 4'1 (0 Ps CDcn r- co OO cc Cc 00 (A CD CDCO CO O? CD 71 01 CO CO 01 Cl an CT1, co oo co OO OD CO O)CO C)COC)C) cr. C) J) T Cl 0)C 01 CO CJ cn a, O) an Oi C) 71 C7 On CD cn C1 T 7. on on cn C)cl C1 CT on O)cn cn on on on on C)cnT T(T (T.' O: ?i on on C1 C1 i cc C } rr rr .- r rrrr r - • rrrr 0C"''''- N J • 1011J) BURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION I , I ' 3432-A Mendocino Avenue • Santa Rosa,CA 95403 • (707)526-9782 • Fax(707)526-9811 November 11, 1999 t ECFjV ED Joe Netter, City Manager City of Rohnert Park NO(/ 1 5 7999 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park CA 94928 O Oily OF HNER7 PARK Dear Joe: I would like to thank you again for meeting with me on October 29th to discuss the status of Burbank's proposed affordable family rental development and our reimbursement request. At that time I mentioned that several other possibilities for rental housing development might be available and that the situation with regard to the parcels we were seeking to assemble in the East Cotati Avenue/Camino Colegio area was still uncertain. At this point the new possibilities I suggested are not available to us. One owner has indicated a desire to hold their property, and the other apparently has a project underway. There remains some uncertainty on our previously proposed sites; however, two sites have been sold to other buyers and a third has been offered at a price higher than we believe is justifiable by any comparable sales within Sonoma County. We are not optimistic about the prospect of any new affordable multi-family housing in Rohnert Park until annexation can occur, but we will pursue any new leads which may appear. We will keep you apprised of any change in status. Additionally we plan to investigate the possibility of acquisition and preservation of any older HUD financed properties in Rohnert Park, which may be in danger of being lost as affordable housing stock. With regard to our request for reimbursement from the Rohnert Park Community Development Commission of costs for predevelopment work on the scattered site proposal, we propose to reduce our previously submitted reimbursement request by the amount of our own administrative costs ($18,312)and seek reimbursement of only out-of-pocket costs($24,065). While most of these costs are unique to the sites we proposed, a portion of the architectural design will be transferable to a new site in the future. Additionally, we propose to secure this outlay within the subordinate debt of a future project, so that they would be repayable to the Community Development Commission. If this arrangement seems workable to you, we will forward a revised reimbursement request. We appreciate the City's consideration of this request. Please contact me or Nick Stewart if further information or discussion would be useful. 137 Yours truly, )fie Miseellasems Coannusiadium Agenda 1 4/fit 7C iz{9J24 545 Copy to: Copy to: John Lowry A Non-Profit Organization Serving Sonoma County COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS 12/14/99 FROM SUBJECT FILE Communications Distributed with Packet Delivery Scheduled Public Appearances [AGENDA] Joe Perry,President-elect Progress Report for Christmas in April*Rohnert Park Herb Cody,Director of So. Co.Martial Arts Presentation of Library Donation 1. P. Stutrud/Resident Parking Tickets-Inconsistent Enforcement P. Stutrud Corresp. 2. A.Kennedy/Sr.Citizens Advisory Corn. Indoor Pool @ Rec Center&Expansion of Senior Center Sr Cit Adv Cmsn Corrsp 3. O.Del Grosso/Merrill Lynch Christmas Calls Event for Seniors, Sat. 12/4 7am-3pm Sr Cit Adv Cmsn Corrsp 4. G. Casellas/U.S. Census Monitoring Public Attitudes toward Census[Original Report in CM's office] Census 2000 5. Local Government Commission Reports Volume 19,No. 11, November, 1999 Local Government Cmsn 6. U.S. Conference of Mayors Petition to End Hunger in America US Conf.Of Mayors 7. U.S. Conference of Mayors Mayors'Campaign Against Breast Cancer US Conf.Of Mayors 8. Shirley J.Manary/Resident Response to Proposed Hillsboro Settlement Hillsboro Settlement 9. ABAG Regional Housing Needs Determination 1999-2006 10. Art Krulevitch/Resident Request for Dog Park Reminder Corresp. Residents 11. Redwood Empire Food Bank Hunger in Sonoma County[Original Report in CM's office] Corresp. Misc. 12. So.Co. Children&Families 1st Cmsn. Technical Resource Committee Meeting, 12/7/99, 10am-Ipm So.Co. Children&Families 1st Cmsn 13. League of CA Cities Increase Legislative Effectiveness; 5%Dues Increase LCC General 14. Ted&Dianna Shimkowski and M. Wayne Thush/Residents Five Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge[AGENDA] Five Creek Bridge 15. Fact Sheet for Council Appointment Lawrence Esparza: Rent Appeals Board Rent Appeals Board Cmsn 16. SCTA Agenda for 12/13/99 Meeting,3:15 pm, Santa Rosa SCTA 17. Dianne Steinhauser,Dist. Div. Chief Funding Consideration for RP Exprswy. Park&Ride Lot Planning Dept.Misc. 18. Donna McKenna/Rancho Cotate Varsity Volleyball Coach Request for Plaques for 1999 Championship Team Corresp.Misc. **Ori,inals Previousl Distributed to Council Communications Distributed at Council Meeting 19. Sonoma/Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART)** Agenda for 12/15/99 Meeting,2:00 pm_(Previously faxed) SMART 20. Resident letters: [see AGENDA] Public Hearing re:Proposed Five-Creek Bridge Five Creek Bridge Ted&Dianna Shimkowski** M. Wayne Thush** Janice Brown 21. S.Manary/Resident Ordinance#494—Green Book Ord. #494 **Originals Previously Distributed to Council COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS 12/14/99 FROM SUBJECT FILE Communications Distributed with Packet Delivery Scheduled Public Appearances [AGENDA] Joe Perry,President-elect Progress Report for Christmas in April*Rohnert Park Herb Cody,Director of So. Co. Martial Arts Presentation of Library Donation 1. P. Stutrud/Resident Parking Tickets-Inconsistent Enforcement P. Stutrud Corresp. 2. A.Kennedy/Sr.Citizens Advisory Corn. Indoor Pool-@ Rec Center&Expansion of Senior Center Sr Cit Adv Cmsn Corrsp 3. O.Del Grosso/Merrill Lynch Christmas Calls Event for Seniors, Sat. 12/4 7am-3pm Sr Cit Adv Cmsn Corrsp 4. G. Casellas/U.S. Census Monitoring Public Attitudes toward Census[Original Report in CM's office] Census 2000 5. Local Government Commission Reports Volume 19,No. 11, November, 1999 Local Government Cmsn 6. U.S.Conference of Mayors Petition to End Hunger in America US Conf. Of Mayors 7. U.S. Conference of Mayors Mayors'Campaign Against Breast Cancer US Conf.Of Mayors 8. Shirley J.Manary/Resident Response to Proposed Hillsboro Settlement Hillsboro Settlement 9. ABAG Regional Housing Needs Determination 1999-2006 10. Art Krulevitch/Resident Request for Dog Park Reminder Corresp.Residents 11. Redwood Empire Food Bank Hunger in Sonoma County[Original Report in CM's office] Corresp. Misc. 12. So.Co. Children&Families 1st Cmsn. Technical Resource Committee Meeting, 12/7/99, loam-lpm So.Co. Children&Families 1st Cmsn 13. League of CA Cities Increase Legislative Effectiveness;5%Dues Increase LCC General 14. Ted&Dianna Shimkowski and M. Wayne Thush/Residents Five Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge[AGENDA] Five Creek Bridge 15. Fact Sheet for Council Appointment Lawrence Esparza: Rent Appeals Board Rent Appeals Board Cmsn 16. SCTA Agenda for 12/13/99 Meeting,3:15 pm, Santa Rosa SCTA 17. Dianne Steinhauser,Dist. Div. Chief Funding Consideration for RP Exprswy. Park&Ride Lot Planning Dept.Misc. 18. Donna McKenna/Rancho Cotate Varsity Volleyball Coach Request for Plaques for 1999 Championship Team Corresp.Misc. **Ori inals Previousl Distributed to Council Communications Distributed at Council Meeting 19. Sonoma/Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART)** Agenda for 12/15/99 Meeting,2:00 pm(Previously faxed) SMART 20. Resident letters: [see AGENDA] Public Hearing re: Proposed Five-Creek Bridge Five Creek Bridge Ted&Dianna Shimkowski** M.Wayne Thush** Janice Brown 21. S.Manary/Resident Ordinance#494—Green Book Ord.#494 **Originals Previously Distributed to Council • From:Paul D.Stutrud To: Date:11/29/99 Time:05:13:02 Page 1 of 2 Paul D. Stutrud COUNCIL: P. O. Box 2205 MISCELLANEOUS Rohnert Park CA 94927 COMMUNICATIONS r4. 29 November 1999 AGEND COPY TO: v�/�,�,i!�L� �1 IVF�J City Manager Joe Netter COPY T0: Mayor Jim Reilly and the City Counc �`� 4 9`1 City of Rohnert Park ��,� C ' �,, 8750 Commerce Boulevard `^l w�'`� RO T * RK Rohnert Park CA 94928 4 via fax and mail RE: Parking tickets -- inconsistent enforcement Dear Mr. Netter and Council Members: On 18 November 1999, I came home to discover that earlier in the day a Rohnert Park Public Safety officer had put a ticket under the windshield of my pickup truck parked on my driveway with the notation: Motor Vehicle Violation -- 17.08.100 RPMC "subject to citeltow. no storage of inoperable/unused vehicle in front or sideyard" A couple of years ago I received a similar citation, at which time I responded with a letter to the City Council that included a substantial list of similar"violators" including a Public Safety Officer, obtained in a walk down Country Club Drive from Golf Course Drive to the Expressway. In the last week, I made similar walks down Country Club Drive, as well as several other streets in 'D', 'F', 'G' and 'H' and will again note that there are a very substantial number of violations (according to what I am being cited for and in reflection of the discussions by the City Council). I will again note that there were several instances where "violating" vehicles were parked in the vicinity of Public Safety Officer's homes Among the "violations" I noted on Country Club Drive, were a camp trailer with no wheels, a camper shell sitting on cement pier-blocks, and a number of inoperable vehicles that I noted that were there from the last time I wrote a letter to the city council. I called Officer Barrow about the "warning notice" I received and made mentioned of the many so-called violations and asked her why she happened to tag my truck. She said she had received a complaint about a boat on a trailer parked across the street from my house and that she "noticed' my pickup truck. My next door neighbor happens to be a Public Safety Officer and I have had no complaints from him nor from the man who owned the boat on the trailer. As it happens the boat was parked on the street for a month. When he and I discussed our warning tickets, he acknowledged that he knew he shouldn't be parking on the street but he couldn't understand why a citation was written for my pickup truck. , From:Paul D.Stutrud To: Date:11/20/99 Time:05:14:13 Page 2 of 2 I will also note that there have been other homes along Hudis Street that have had large commercial trucks. large camp trailers, a horse trailer, other boats on trailers parked for several days or longer. Around the corner from my home on Hudis is another Public Safety Officer who parks a large trailer next to his house and it too is often parked on the street for more than a day. Further down the street another Public Safety Officer used to have a very large boat on a trailer parked for weeks at a time that belonged to her son-in-law (another Public Safety Officer, no longer with the department). During my precinct walking, I saw many examples of blatant violations and heard many complaints by neighbors about certain city officials who had large Winnebago-type vehicles parked for long periods of time in front of their homes, along with trailers or boats and yet nothing was ever done. I heard complaints about boats that have been sitting in driveways, or next to driveways for years. Cars sitting on jack stands with no wheels, sometimes even on the street. could recite many more examples but the point of this discussion is the apparent discriminatory enforcement of the City's ordinance. If Public Safety is not going to enforce the ordinance street-by-street and consistently then the ordinance should be changed or deleted. If my pickup truck is going to be subject to being towed, while there exists other similar violations within the same block and through out the city, I am going to take legal action, including formal complaints against every violation I see. I think the better solution is through the city council and a review of the Ordinance, the Vehicle Codes, the CC&R s of all sections of Rohnert Park and the establishment of a "friendly" policy that allows neighbors to decide if they have objections. Yours truly, Paul D. Stutrud COUNCIL: \17 e A MISCELLANEOUS IAJ 2cr) COMMUNICATIONS y� t� Ann Kennedy AGENDA President COPY TO: � Rohnert Park Senior Citizens Advisory Commission COPY 10: Rohnert Park Senior Center 6800 Hunter Drive, Suite A Rohnert Park, CA. 94928 November 22, 1999 Mayor James J. Reilly Jr. and The Rohnert Park City Council Rohnert Park City Hall 6750 Commerce Boulevard Rohnert Park, CA. 94928-2486 Dear Mayor Reilly and City Council Members: At the November 18, 1999 meeting of the Rohnert Park Senior Citizens Advisory Commission the following issues were discussed: 1. A covered and heated swimming pool, to be constructed at the Rohnert Park Recreation Center. 2. Expansion of the Rohnert Park Senior Center into the areas now occupied by other Rohnert Park City Agencies. The Commission believes that both of the above projects will contribute to the well being of the seniors and other citizens of Rohnert Park. A covered and heated swimming pool will enable those individuals who require water therapy but are unable to tolerate the colder outdoor pools to participate in these city activities. It would also would allow year round swimming for all members of the community. The addition of a pool at the Rohnert Park Recreation Center would enhance the current gym, exercises and weight room facilities. Expansion of the Senior Center is needed to accommodate the larger number of active seniors now living in Rohnert Park. The additional space would allow the Senior Center to expand their programs and services to better meet Rohnert Park Seniors' needs. The Rohnert Park Senior Citizens Advisory Commission would appreciate your consideration and support regarding these issues. Sincerely, Ann Kennedy -C(61�-' c „0,* ecolk CC: Joseph Netter, Rohnert Park City Manager John Hartnett, Rohnert Park Recreation Services Manager ,�A Merrill Lynch Orissa Del Grosso CFM ciVA\ Financial Consultant 0 '\9 99 Private Client Group 90 South"E" Street . Santa Rosa,CA 95404 O''Nc ARK 707 575-6331 800 937-0795 FAX 707 575-6361 James J.Reilly,Jr.,Joseph Netter and The City Council City of Rohnert Park 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park,CA 94927 November 24, 1999 Dear Mayor Reilly,Manager Netter and The City Council: Twenty years ago,Merrill Lynch started a holiday tradition: We invited local senior citizens into our branch offices so they could use our telephones,free of charge,to call their loved ones around the world. This year,on Saturday,December 4,from 7 am to,3 pm,Merrill Lynch will once again open its doors at 90 So. E Street to the senior citizens of Sonoma County. We expect over 150 seniors to join us and share in the food,decorations and holiday cheer. This is the ninth year the Santa Rosa Office has sponsored the Christmas Calls event,and we invite you to become part of the tradition. We would be greatly honored if you would drop by and extend your holiday greetings. If you have any questions please call me at 575-6331. You can RSVP by filling out the section below. ely, Si0��w nssai .2..tz,e ,d.,0-s...4-4 Del Grosso Coordinator,Christmas Calls 1999 RSVP.... Yes,I would be happy to stop by and join you for this community event! No,I will be unable to join you for this event. You may fax this to 707-575-6361 or Mail it to: Merrill Lynch/Attn: Orissa M.Kruse 90 So. E Street COUNCIL: Santa Rosa,CA 95404 MISCELLANEOUS 1 'AXED COMMUNICATIONS �`' . ` AGENDA COPY TO: + ICOPYTO: U.S. CENSUS MONITORING November 16, 1999 f C1�E BOARD - PRESIDENTIAL MEMBERS 9 1999 4700 Silver Hill Road Suite 1250-3 Suitland,MD 20746 Hon. Jim Reilly Mayor of Rohnert Park rCa+�N T I'P1/4Ri( Phone:(301)457-9900 Fax:(301)457-9901 6750 Commerce Road Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Gilbert F.Casellas Co-Chair Dear Mayor Reilly: Everett M.Ehrlich Lorraine Green Enclosed please find a copy of our new bipartisan nationwide survey about public attitudes toward the census. While the results show relatively low awareness of Census 2000, it indicates that the Census Bureau's $167 Mark Johnson million ad campaign is on target and should effectively motivate people to Executive Director participate. In addition, we are providing the Monitoring Board's most recent joint report to Congress in which the Board unanimously endorses the Bureau's advertising initiative. We hope you find the materials to be useful. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Atkel; Gilbert F. Casellas Presidential Co-Chair U.S. Census Monitoring Board Enclosures COUNCIL:._ �� MW$` ' 614 COMMUNICATIONS �� AGENDA COPY TO: I COPY TO: 111 +' �'� � a LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMIS ION ' o rri 0 o z m o C r r v z v CTD cv w Volume 19, No. 11 November 1999 WC.) iz • ENCOURAGING HEALTHIER Speakers noted that you should fins ,r, an ! HABITS someone the audience trusts to relay th / 11 message.When buying a car,a relative' The majority of Americans agree that it lemon often counts for more than the is important to eat five servings of fruit car's rating in Consumer Reports. In and vegetables each day, but still they addition, role models are important. A don't. This being the case, what does a few people typically adopt innovative program need to do in order to be suc- ideas and behaviors first, and, in time, cessful at promoting recycling,reducing the innovations spread to the entire group. the use of aerosol sprays, or even in- creasing the number of people who vote? To learn about all the behavior change Two workshops titled, "Beyond Bro- principles presented at the work- chures," were held by the LGC on shops,you can order Beyond Brochures: November 9 and 10 in Northern and Strategies for Increasing Program Ef- Southern California to explain behavior fectiveness, There are a limited number change principles — drawn from mul- of copies available.Contact Karen Cole tiple research studies — and show at the LGC publications office, (916) participants how to use them. 448-1198. One of the many interesting facts shared • WHAT'S NEW AT THE LGC? at the workshops: individuals who agree to small requests are more likely to agree LGC matches developers and local gov- to a bigger one later. For example, 76 ernments: For several years now LGC percent of people who were asked to put staff have been receiving requests from a large unsightly sign on their front lawn members who have a Smart Growth about driving safely had previously project and want someone to develop or agreed to displaying a small one in their build it. At the same time, we occasion- window. Of those who weren't ask to ally receive phone calls from developers display a small sign, only 17 percent who want to know where there are op- agreed to the big one. portunities for building such projects.In light of a demonstrated need, we have Feedback helps maintain behavior moved ahead to set up a matchmaking change. For example, utility companies program. Developers of successful who try to get customers to conserve projects will be asked to pay a small fee electricity are more successful if they let to cover the cost of this program. For people know if current use has gone more information, contact Judy Corbett down compared to a year ago. or Linda Cloud at the LGC office or look on our website, www.lgc.org. Social feedback is useful. A large sign was posted at an expressway exit show- A requestforyoure-mail address: From ing the speed limit and the percentage of time to time, we send time-sensitive drivers who were not speeding on the information or resource materials to our previous day.When the sign was posted, members via e-mail. If you would like the number of speeding drivers dropped your name added to this distribution list, by more than 50 percent. A simple sign please call Crystal Jackson (916) 448- posting the speed limit alone had no 1198 or e-mail at members@lgc.org. effect. Printed on recycled paper,of course • WETLANDS GRANTS and general plan amendment process, AVAILABLE the successes of this project include inter jurisdictional cooperation and the cre- The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and ation of permanent urban limit lines.To the North American Wetlands Conser- protect and acquire agricultural land,the vation Council are inviting proposals for specific plan uses mitigation programs matching funds of up to $50,000 for that result in permanent protection of modest wetland conservation activities, agricultural properties, agricultural and especially projects conducted by new conservation easements, land tracts and grantees and partners who may be un- transfer of development rights.The spe- able to compete in the regular grants cific plan also formulates development program.For information,contact Keith standards and guidelines for rural transi- Morehouse at (703) 358-1784. The ap- tion areas. plication deadline is December 5. Councilmember Tom Pico City of Pleasanton ■ NEWS OF OUR MEMBERS The City of Culver City completed a Faced with a need for more apartment visioning effort in 1990 which led to the units, the City of Tulare in 1996 ap- reconstruction of their downtown, the pointed a Multiple Family Residential revitalization of commercial strips and Citizen's Committee to determine where the enhancement of the school system. in the City such housing should be built They are now kicking off a new strategic and to upgrade the quality of the hous- planning and visioning effort in which ing. their goal is to hear from 25 percent of their residents (at least 25,000 people). In the past, the siting of apartments in Communication will occur through corn- Tulare had been an after-thought with munity meetings, questionnaires, web such housing often sited near less desir- surveys, and cable station call-ins. This able land uses.In addition,the quality of input will allow the city to set priorities the apartments and their management and lay the groundwork for the next was often inadequate. To address these decade. problems,the Committee first identified CAO Mark Winogrond a list of fourteen criteria for siting apart- Culver City ments within the city, then toured the city and identified potential sites for fu- Inspired by a downtown revitalization ture construction. plan prepared for the City of Placerville by urban designer Michael Freedman, To assure higher quality,the Committee the City of Placerville's downtown mer- established mandatory conditions to fa- chants and property owners are moving cilitate and improve final products in- ahead with the establishment of a"Busi- cluding on-site managers for largercom- ness Improvement Area" and a plexes and storage facilities. The City "Business Improvement District." The Council agreed,at the Committee's sug- City is looking forward to re-establish- gestion,to require a conditional use per- ing its historic and economic center and mit of all multiple family units so that to again being the focal point of El Dorado neighbors will have an opportunity to County and Sierra "Gold Country." voice their opinions and get involved in Councilmember Kathi Lishman helping to produce the final design. City of Placerville Councilmember Nettie Washington City of Tulare New Members: We warmly welcome Councilmember Sandy The Cities of Livermore and Pleasanton IIIIII111111'111'IIIII Baldonado of the City of have worked with Alameda County for IP Claremont to the LGC! over 12 years to preserve and enhance IIII ■�■•" the South Livermore Valley as a valu- able agricultural, economic and natural resource — while also enabling limited LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION urban development.Using a specific plan 1414 K.St. •Suite 250•Sacramento,CA 95814.916-448-1198 LivablePlaces Update November 1999 Emerging Trends in Community Planning and Design 1999 Ahwahnee Award Winners illustrated model project write ups with Announced:A select committee made up of details on each of these efforts.They can be UC Dean of the College of Environmental ordered from the Local Government Design Harrison Fraker;Landscape Architect Commission's Center for Livable Communi- Ken Kay;Anthony Lettieri,the President of ties at a cost of$12 for the entire set of nine. the California Chapter of the American To place an order,call Karen at Planning Association;Brian Scott,President (916)448-1198.A summary of some of the of Livable Oregon;the Executive Director of project winners follows. the Northern California Non-Profit Housing Association Dianne Spaulding;Planning Suburban Town Creates A Main Street: Consultant Steve Tracy;American Institute of The city of Brea California,grew up as a post- Architects'California Chapter President war,auto-oriented suburban community with- Steve Winkel;and LGC Center Director Paul out a downtown.In the 1990's,however,city Zykofsky spent a very intense day and leaders took on the challenging task of creating evening reviewing almost 100 entries in this a heart in this city where there wasn't one.This year's competition.The quality of the entries effort so impressed the Ahwahnee Awards was outstanding,making the judges'job judges that one exdaimed"it's fantastic to see a extremely difficult.However,after much city take this kind of initiative to transform their agonizing and hair-pulling,eight projects community." were selected for awards. In the beginning,the city actively engaged In the category of built projects the Portland, business people and citizens in visioning a Oregon region took the lead.Orenco Sta- new 25-acre downtown.They organized tion—a transit-oriented neighborhood of "walks"of citizens through the potential 1,800 homes in the town of Hillsboro—and downtown site to elicit an understanding of Belmont Dairy in Portland's Sunnyside the area and its potential;and they held a neighborhood—an abandoned milk process- series of"Downtown Idea Fairs,"an interac- ing plant that was converted into a mixed- tive process that encouraged community use center—were selected for awards.In the members to articulate their aspirations for a category of plans,the award winners were new city center. the city of Brea,California's plan to create a downtown in a suburban community and A creative solution emerged from this effort: Playa Vista—a 1,000 acre new town on the the transformation of the blank back side of former Hughes Aircraft site near the Los an existing shopping center.Their plan was Angeles airport.A video produced by the to line the wall with new retail uses that face Association of Bay Area Governments pro- outward from the older center to create one viding background on problems of growth side of the new main street.Realizing that the and potential solutions,Hometown Blues,was safety and vitality of a downtown is greatly selected as a winner in the category of corn- enhanced by making it a 24-hour environ- munity programs.The California Main Street ment,the city planned 86 units of housing, Program,an effort which has helped numer- including apartments over retail uses.To. ous commercial districts in California come ensure evening activity,they added a 22 alive,was the other winner in this category. screen theater. In the category of government policies,the winners were Oregon's statewide Transpor- • '`.' ' ,> tation and Growth Management Program, <i ;.-ever t_ initiated by the state in 1992 to assure more �i i " "" • livable Oregon communities and San Rafael a, e�' .'y+ n ; California's highly successful plan to revital tt t„ti' T '4 "'" � ize their historic downtown.Finally,a model t rtd• , ;. 1 , a, ' for growth without sprawl developed by 1 1,t , ,„/` local designers,the City of Santa Fe and 1,000 Friends of New Mexico walked away with the award for the most outstanding effort in area's new Main Street the category of regional planning. Public spaces,an essential element of a good downtown,are being created.The plan The Local Government Commission's Center provides for the development of a series of for Livable Communities has produced pedestrian-oriented urban plazas linked by tree-lined streets which will eventually lead which previously served as a truck n inte- to a regional network. nance yard.A third phase is expected to be initiated in the year 2000. New civic elements are being provided in the area including the refurbished city clock and The project is in an excellent location—near a new police annex.Street furniture,public a major transit route and within walking and signage,and artwork are also being added. bicycling distance of commercial services, employment,parks and schools.Its design is To avoid the sea of parking common in subur- exemplary.The building's original high ban downtowns,the city has implemented a ceilings with exposed trusses were retained, shared parking strategy and has planned two with skylights and large windows allowing new public parking structures.Surface parking generous natural light into the open living areas are limited to the street and small parking spaces.Rooftop gardens are provided which lots located behind buildings. offer semi-private patio space adjacent to second floor units and public gathering Realizing that a successful downtown cannot places for residents.The traditional architec- be located on a street where there is speeding ture of the original building was preserved traffic,city leaders sited the new downtown and enhanced.Finally,energy and environ- on a secondary street,one block removed mental standards were used in the renova- from the intersection of two,high-volume tion and construction. arterials.Connectivity to other parts of the city is a part of the plan,which provides for linkages to nearby areas. ' ' "' , The first step in building the plan was the . I I • massive demolition of existing poorly de- r " + . r OOP r a Ill signed and built structures in the area.How- I as ` 64 ever,once the buildings were demolished, ArtI,: •. the recession hit and the land sat vacant— `_ r "nr* ._I° '" making some residents fearful that a good �9► .} plan had gone astray.However,the city's Belmont Dairy Townhouses leadership held firm and now success is assured. Although this project is of a fairly high den- sity,area neighborhood associations strongly Projects and plans have been submitted for supported it.There are several reasons for 95%of the parcels in the redevelopment this.The development eliminated a neighbor- district,encouraged by a fast-track permit- hood eyesore.The historic architecture of the ting process.Brea's creative,steady leader- project upgrades the neighborhood and fits ship and engaged citizenry has created an in with the surrounding wood frame,cedar excellent model for other,auto-oriented shingled homes.And finally,the develop- suburban communities to follow.For more ment provides area residents with a specialty information contact Chris Kelley or Susan grocery store and a community room which Georgino in Brea's planning division and is available to neighborhood residents. redevelopment agency(714)990-7600. • This project received some public sector From Milk Processing Plant to Mixed-Use assistance including loans provided by the Center: What do you do with an old,indus- City of Portland and the State of Oregon,low trial facility in the heart of a neighborhood?If income housing tax credits,and related you are among the creative people of Port- financing.For more information,contact the land,you turn it into a beautiful mixed-use developer,Belmont Limited Partnership, center made up of retail and residential uses. (503)242-0084. Judges of the Ahwahnee Awards observed, "This is a wonderful project." Award-Winning Video Available: One of the Ahwahnee Award winners is an excellent The first phase of the reuse project used video produced by the Association of Bay 40,000 square feet of the original building, Area Governments(ABAG).Judges felt the and added an additional 100,000 square feet video offered appealing solutions to accom- to create a fully-leased project with a spe- modate future growth in a positive way. cialty grocery store,66 affordable apartments, Copies are available for$10 including post- and 19 market-rate lofts.The second phase age and handling.To order one,call Laura added 30 rowhouses on an adjacent site Stuchinsky of ABAG at(510)464-7900. Livable Places Update is published monthly and is a project of the Local Government Commission's Center for Livable Communities. For subscription information call us at'S(916)448-1198. If you have news from your area to include in future issues,please send it to: LPU, 1414 K Street,Suite 250, Sacramento, CA 95814. P4BCOrv1 THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS Q i • 1620 EYE STREET,NORTHWEST WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 ' * • ; TELEPHONE(202)293-7330 • FAX(202)293-2352 TDD(202)293-9445 * .4tr URL:www.usmayors.org/uscm President: • WELLINGTON E.WEBB Mayor of Denver ('� Vice President: S} 1999 H.BRENT COLES � (J Mayor of Boise Past Presidents: VICTOR ASHE 1-`'�J�F Mayor of Knoxville G November 17, 1999 DEEDEE CORRADINI T�h;11Y' Mayor of Salt Lake City FiCI�..NER RICHARD M.DALEY Mayor of Chicago PAUL HELMKE Mayor of Fort Wayne JOSEPH P.RILEY JR. Mayor of Charleston,SC 'hustees: DENNIS W.ARCHER Mayor of Detroit Dear Mayor: CHARLES E.BOX Mayor of Rockford LEE R.CLANCEY Mayor of Cedar Rapids JAMESy r of Hempstead GARNER Mawr Enclosed you will find a brochure describing efforts to petition the PATRICK HENRY HAYS Mayor of North Little Rock SHARPE JAMES citizens of your city to help end hunger in America. The Alan Shawn Mayor of Newark,NJ PATRICK McMANUSJ. Mayor of Lynn Feinstein Foundation will award $70,000 - 10 cities with the greatest THOMAS M.MENINO RIMayor of MUL BostonS percentage of signers from the local population will receive $5,000 and 20 Mayor of Palatine MEYERA E.OBERNDORF runner-up cities will each receive $1,000 - to support local hunger Mayor of Virginia Beach JAMES P.PERRON Mayor of Elkhart programs. M SUSAN SAVAGE Mayor of'Rilsa DAVID W.SMITH Mayor of Newark,CA MARC" Etosirch ,Chair We hope you will participate in this petition drive and return all Mayor of New Orleans SUSAN J.M.BAUMAN signatures to us by February 29, 2000. Mayor of Madison SHARON SAYLES BELTON Mayor of Minneapolis J.CHRISTIAN BOLLWAGE Mayor of Elizabeth Sincerely, B.BOST Mayor of Irvington LEE P.BROWN Mayor of Houston WILLIE L.BROWN,JR. Mayor ofSan Francisco SILA M.CALDERON ild;110.11'11. 4C•sillCINIC•416.011...111116 Mayor of San Juan SAM KATHRYN CAMPANA Mayor of Scottsdale VINCENT A.CIANCI,JR. Mayor of Providence NORMAN COLEMAN Mayor of St.Paul HAL J DAUB J. Thomas Cochran Mayor of Omaha BRIAN EBERSOLE • Mayor of Tacoma Executive Director ELIZABETH G.FLORES Mayor of Laredo JOSEPH P.GANIM Mayor of Bridgeport SUSAN GOLDING Mayor of San Diego JEFF GRIFFIN Mayor of Reno MICHAEL A.GUIDO Mayor of Dearborn WILLIAM A. OHNSON, R. Mayor of ester, SCOTT L.KING Mayor of Gary RONALD KIRK Mayor of Dallas DANNEL P.MALLOY Mayor Stamford COUNCIL: JIM MARSHALL Mayor of Macon PATRICK Mc CRORY /� (s Mayor of Charlotte-, - r,IS Cfl I it{+f1FflIS DAVID W.MOORE Mayor of -- ` �� ARLENE J.MULDER COMMUNICATION'S Mayor of Arlington Heights — • BEVERLY O'NEILL Mayor of Long Beach AGENDA DOUGLAS PALMER Mayor of'Ilrnton DONALD L.PLUSQUELLIC COPY T0: Mayor of Akron EDWARD RENDELL Mayor of Philadelphia COPY TO: KURT L.SCHMOKE Mayor of Baltimore Executive Director. J.THOMAS COCHRAN . it T-vrv-d• MAYORS AND THE ALAN SI ALAN SHAWN FEINSTEIN F FEINSTEIN FOUNDATION T DATION THE UNITED STA STATES CONFERENCE OF H MAYORS AND THE ALAN SI ALAN SHAWN FEINSTEIN F FOUNDATION THE UNITED UNITED STATES CONFEREE CONFERENCE OF MAYORS i MAYORS AND THE ALAN SI ALAN SHAWN SHAWN FEIN SHAWN FEINSTEIN FOUND FEINSTEIN FOUNDATION T DATION THE UNITED STAT UNITED STATES CONFEREE CONFERENCE OF MAYORS MAYORS AND THE ALAN S THE ALAN SHAWN SHAWN SHAWN FEINSTEIN FOUND FOUNDATION THE UNITED UNITED STATES CONFERS, CONFERENCE OF MAYORS A AND THE ALAN SHAWN SH SHAWN SHAWN FEINSTEIN FEINSTEIN FOUNDATION TI DATION THE UNITED STATI UNITED STATES CONFEREN CONFERENCE OF MAYORS) AND THE ALAN SHAWN FEI FEINSTEIN FOUNDATION 1 FEINSTEIN FOUNDATION T THE UNITED STATES CONF CONFERENCE OF MAYORS MAYORS AND THE ALAN S! SHAWN FEINSTEIN FOUND FOUNDATION THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF M CONFERENCE OF MAYORS MAYORS AND THE ALAN S ALAI) SHAWN FEINSTEIN F FEINSTEIN FOUNDATION 1 TION THE UNITED STATES STATES CONFERENCE OF T OF MAYORS AND THE ALAP ALAN SHAWN FEINSTEIN Fi FOUNDATION THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF M MAYORS AND THE ALAN S ALAN SHAWN FEINSTEIN I FEINSTEIN FOUNDATION 1 TION THE UNITED STATES STATES CONFERENCE OF M MAYORS AND THE ALAN SF SHAWN FEINSTEIN FOUND FOUNDATION THE UNITED UNITED STATES CONFEREA CONFERENCE OF MAYORS MAYORS AND THE ALAN SI- SHAWN FEINSTEIN FOUND) RATION THE UNITED STATI STATES CONFERENCE OF M MAYORS AND THE ALAN S ALAN SHAWN FEINSTEIN f FEINSTEIN FOUNDATION 1 TION THE UNITED STATES STATES CONFERENCE OF h OF MAYORS AND THE ALAI ALAN SHAWN FEINSTEIN F FEINSTEIN FOUNDATION 1 TION THE UNITED STATES STATES CONFERENCE OF M OF MAYORS AND THE ALAI ALAN SHAWN FEINSTEIN FI FOUNDATION THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF M. MAYORS AND THE ALAN SI-i SHAWN FEINSTEIN FOUND) DATION THE UNITED STATE STATES CONFERENCE OF M. MAYORS AND THE ALAN Sh SHAWN FEINSTEIN FOUND) DATION THE UNITED STATI STATES CONFERENCE OF M MAYORS AND THE ALAN SF SHAWN FEINSTEIN FOUND) DATION THE UNITED STATE STATES CONFERENCE OF M Dear Mayor Rhode Island philanthropist Alan Shawn Feinstein is offering $70,000 in a drive to obtain signatures to a petition calling on Congress to end hunger in America. The ten cities to secure the most signatories by February 29, 2000, with a minimum of I % of their population, will each receive a donation from him of $5,000 to support their local hunger programs. The twenty runner-up cities will each receive $1,000. The awards will be announced in March 2000. In issuing the challenge, Feinstein says: "To have 30 million people experiencing or in danger of hunger in the greatest country in the world is a disgrace. The government must do more, by strengthening the Federal nutrition safety net and aiding local public/private partnerships. The more signers we get, the stronger we can drive the point home:' Cities and their citizens calling on our government to make a commitment to end hunger in America is a major step to wiping out domestic hunger early in the next century. join us in meeting the Feinstein challenge and in making our voices heard. Make as many copies of the following petition as you can use, and get as many signers as you can. Anyone of any age in your city can sign. (No duplicate signers please.) WeRinpui Webb President Mayor of Denver Peter Clavelle Chair, Task Force Hunger and Homelessness fi- J. Thomas Cochran Executive Director The U.S. Conference of Mayors THE U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS and THE ALAN SHAWN FEINSTEIN FOUNDATION: Petition to End Hunger in America • The ten cities with the greatest percentage of signers from their local population by February 29, 2000 will each receive a donation from the Alan Shawn Feinstein Foundation of $5,000 to support local hunger programs. • The twenty runner-up cities will each receive $1,000. • To be eligible for participation, a city must collect petitions (signatures) of at least one percent (1% percent) of its population. • Each city should send to the Conference of Mayors all of their signed petitions the last week of February 2000. Send them to: The U.S. Conference of Mayors Attn: Eugene T. Lowe, Assistant Executive Director 1620 Eye Street, N.W., 4th Floor Washington, DC 20006 Questions regarding the Petition should be directed to Eugene T. Lowe, Assistant Executive Director, at 202-861-6710. Please put your best efforts behind this drive — not only to win some of the Feinstein money, but also because the more signatures we get, the more help we will likely get from the federal government for our cities. We, the undersigned, ask the President and Congress to make a commit- ment to end hunger in America. To have 35 million people in our country going hungry, or unsure of when they will eat next, is a national disgrace. Hunger threatens our moral fabric and our future productivity. We call upon leaders, on a bipartisan basis, to exercise moral authority to end the shame and blight on our nation. Name (Print) Signature 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Alan Shawn Feinsteir City/Town State THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 1620 EYE STREET,NORTHWEST * * * • * 1 WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 ` •* ' ' 293-7330TELEPHONE(202) RECEIVED FAX(202)93-2352 ,,. .�, k4tt,, " 0w TDD(202)293-9445 `7 * S� NOV 3 0 1999 URL:www.usmayors.org/uscm President: WELLINGTON E.WEBB Mayor of Denver CITY OF November 18, 1999 Vice President: H.BRENT COLES ROHNERT PARK Mayor of Boise Past Presidents: VICTOR ASHE Mayor of Knoxville DEEDEE CORRADINI Dear Mayor: Mayor of Salt Lake City Y RICHARD M.DALEY Mayor of Chicago PAUL HELMKE Mayor of Fort Wayne JOSEPH P.RILEY The Mayors' Campaign Against Breast Cancer is now in its third year. The Mayor of Charleston, eston,SC Trustees: Campaign, which is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and DENNIS W.ARCHER Mayor of Detroit Prevention (CDC) under a five-year Cooperative Agreement with the CHARLES E.BOX Mayor of Rockford LEE R.CLANCEY Conference of Mayors, encourages women, particularly those who are Mayor of Cedar Rapids JAMES MayorofHeNmpstead medically underserved, to seek mammography, for early detection saves lives. PATRICKLitlMayo of HENRY e Rock A brochure about the Campaign is enclosed. SHARPE JAMES Mayor of Newark,NJ PATRICK J.MCMANUS Mayor ofM.ynn THOMAS M.MENINO The emphasis of the Campaign in its third year is on outreach and service Mayor of Boston RITA L. f as Mayorr o of Palatine delivery, especially for uninsured or underinsured women and priority MEYERA E.OBERNDORF Mayor of virnia Beach populations. Later in the year the Conference will document local activities in JAMES P.PERRON Mayor of Elkhart M.SUSAN SAVAGE support of the Campaign in an edition of Best Practices, the third such volume Mayor of"'Lisa DAVID W SMITH to be devoted to breast cancer awareness. Other materials will be sent to Mayor of Newark,CA Advisory Board: Campaign members throughout the year, and there will be opportunities for the • MARC H.MORtAL,Chair Mayor of New Orleans SUSAN J.M.BAUMAN exchange of information in forums and at special events held in conjunction Mayor of Madison SHARON SAYLES BELTON with the Winter and Annual Meetings. Mayor of Minneapolis J.CHRISTIAN Mayor of AGE Elizabeth SARA B.BOST Ma.or of Irvington P.LEE BROWNIf you are one of the 285 Mayors who have joined the Mayors' Campaign Mayor of Houston WILLIE L.BROWN,JR. Against Breast Cancer your membership is much appreciated. If you have not Mayor of San Francisco SRA M. Mayor San Juan already joined you are cordially invited to do so, and for your convenience a SAM KATHRYN CAMPANA Mayor of Scottsdale response card is attached to the enclosed brochure. If you need more VINCENT A.CIANCI,JR. C vi dence NORMANO information about the Mayors' Campaign please call Richard C. Johnson, Mayor of St.Paul HALJ.DAUB Director of Health Programs, at 202-861-6753. .,Mayor of Omaha BRIAN EBERSOLE Mayor of'Eacoma ELIZABETH G.FLORES Mayor of Laredo Sincerely, JOSEPH P.GANIM Mayor of Bridgeport SUSAN GOLDING Mayor of San Diego JEFF GRIFFIN Mayor of Reno /� MICHAEL A.GUIDO �461KA Mayor of Dearborn WILLIAM A.)OHNSON, R. Mayr of Rochester, J. T mas Cochran SCOTT L.KING Mayor of Gary RONALD KIRK Exec five Director Mayor of Dallas DANNEL P.MALLOY Mayor of Stamford JIM MARSHALL Mayor of Macon Enclosure PATRICK Mc CRORY Mayor of Charlotte DAVID W.MOORE I n!1!!a,1/•ll . Mayor of Beaumont ARLENE J.MULDER - -- --- -- -- —� Mayor of Arlington Heights MISCELLANEOUS q0\ BEVERLY O'NEILL Mayor of Long Beach DOUGLASyor of Long llenton Mayor COMMUNICATIONS 2 Maor DONALD L.PLUSQUELLIC Mayor of Akron EDWARD RENDELL AGENDA Mayor of Philadelphia — KURT L.SCHMOKE Mayor of Baltimore COPY TO: Executive utive Director: J.THOMAS COCHRAN COPY TO: • oi.■ . ..ra "r 114 , _. . , . , . _, , n , ro c C Y. 3 r R .. n kC 0 o vr . r, o C. Grc , u ro CS. O C. J r. n V `C - zmr > � m� 1 zm D.-0 � = —i y n H •= '= = y C =na' m� - 1 �—I CA C1 C Q O C../O C7 _ n 04 SD N C DJ N Fi V {J/�+��Jam( j D z rn J > -D �, mtn -� 3 :: ., ° H z 1/,rye rn LLn i Imo^ 3 0 ,N N �Cra�N �I V 1 F a ( '- ' 7 ' ' 11..•f=L: '2.' il.'di >n 0E0 ya,--) .......„ CD od �� Dn D r -, U zrn J _ Der, _ � zrn � � = u 2m ?.� -< CAD p n> dommilliiiil Iv% � o CI) ISfir iiiii. a %I t0 � �h I n z 0 — \ J �j�DC� mt-r �� m .Gm �.> `< z > v • m� -4 J zo-45 �m a �a 3 c',N , da C7d mv-E ,r . --- -, (y c. N 2^ d R p d— d a Cf =d arc., � (.rla3 a v."y'aoay •=m n 0 m_n o o cF•o o m o-o � LI 5'`oo Hili! CD Q c)Li v'-m A- trd'S a �qo• n,f cMu1Lffi1Q4j am _ y ii/WM�`'... - c.0 . a' Oo• mc __^LflhI! W1llk V =d -? C �•- IJ) • �7 m _�� ix, 3 oa aoo ��=c' �� a o m=-,=,-. C�[-a Jam' m o o'-a o m f3p pC-3.. c) f m a �,o .Sr « Ol O O y O ` 7 C.cq tD j ' nD z �= m� � m y (_)D z O + _ y vl w3 o_I_,..,=, -•a-o g^o o d . 3 g, F c-,� .-�,- r c., d,Cy, = c CO fD= - °3 n C 1 , d-O d --d�-p- •• • • •aC.CO_!v CD 3=\` to s‹c.3=� m�o =n CO <-.9 -3d ._ �• =_ Q2,8�m bc2d��=-, o a m m , 2 c o o•m ,� H o=N S.n 'O K N=.• co �h'O N y- .-N.d 3 in �' pp ff�,f =d CI OS f`j nr=+=N•Gny n __ �d c o o =-, =y o o.tm}_3 y�Q m'�*va 7 d m o m m �m m 3 a O c d ' O .'...- . < 0 O C,C-'� a.d 2 =a T a C n' -N.O 2'O•�_1 .-- j:FUt = o .ao" o `o '� =o3da4y� : a ,=CrO1111 d: =•. ..v.,eo d iflflJ o .o d h:^�cmc 113 3._*`*�: --"='ems u.``o'o ot.-o a a �� a a .o CD Co `omc' ova=`�c J+' 3? �o.h-).20--- <•'c�-. Rio yo.,!'gi•crm =m���dlaco e'-� -' H3� A • CO A ="". 1 "., d d'DO st ..«H 341.o. Us; =, 3.c ci..aG= lV�� o, �. cotZi a ^o aTRI Q'o`-c,--I w -er-C c� •-4 =as IT C.7 N N—I imIiigji° . ,ar".'. ,,, d d.o ^•y n= ei' •N°3`1 !- - u ......•e'Rd _=c0 6ii =ro=or,.N. V a'i p,n r .���=.ccC1 3 d,=,, �. .•,c`'_,in..N n�"0 u''°�C3 0.. N N c Ci Ci 3 m m�....2, -• .n. m or -04. •E•p ,, .=..y,f ,.p c--.�. n CY Da n cD LAd�..� 'a (p O d N d �..�.Y[9 p� r� -.,may 2 N !D C =O B.,. 3 cD CO d y=or d d o CD a�i=\. d,y D V=0 0 p CD d /lNr.I!ftliI; tD !-t1-UF .ff ft-U; _.. t Cf,rLd Da C>�p =._. ='Q Y'n c N 1.02 -d; ^�i. ('*C N cCi),d•., Co CO CD d= .�/ = O?'cOo a�o d•c oc=.., = rL y o c-.c,o N c�.a d_3N-•=. c,«,_,. �a /�00-073't�T✓� �3<'_^'- d. o ad.,,d c c3 =a co 0 =Oo- a m=.a y'r"`r� dNmo=a ,„ n`imo�,» o3 Co o Oa _ /1o'j'(�tltj<° N o_-o ow. n avp pdp"'4`^- 3 ag°.o• cl f9 N T W zm '�.V \ - �� d lD f9 d .N=t= =i C ' ,,_, r. r--L . . Call to loin ,' 'ayors' Campaign Against Breast Cancer I want to join The Mayors'Campaign Against Breast Cancer to establish or expand coalitions,initiatives,and/or other activi- ties for early detection and control of this disease Mayor t k 5 city ___ state — CrN C t My staff contact person will be: name: RI n title ANC;F(2' 1 , agency: ' mailing address:_- city— — — state zip phone: fax: My city maybe contacted by other cities for information about our programs. 0 Yes 0 No RECEIVED 301 Rio Vista Lane Rohnert Park, CA 94928 NOV 2 9 1999 November 26, 1999 COUNCIL: DIY OF ■ AOHI4ERT F MISCELLANEOUS Mayor James Reilly COMMUNICATIONS 4351 Gloria Court AGENDA Rohnert Park, CA 94928 COPY TO: j? '�, Dear mayor Reilly: COPY TO: ■ In the minutes from the Rent Board meeting of 11/11/99, City Attorney Strauss stated that you and Mr. Flores want to hear from residents regarding the proposed Hillsboro settlement. This letter is in response to that request. The City of Rohnert Park is guilty of conspiring with the attorney for the mobilehome parks, David Spangenberg, to deny the residents of these parks their Civil Rights under the United States Constitution. Specifically, the City of Rohnert Park is guilty of denying the mobilehome park residents their right to due process under the Fifth Amendment. This happened in the summer of 1993 when I had taken this case to the Sonoma County District Attorney, and the District Attorney was going to prosecute both the park owners and the City of Rohnert Park for the gross extortion that existed because of the actions of both the City of Rohnert Park and the park owners. At that time, City Attorney John Flitner went to the D. A. and begged and pleaded for him to drop the case. The District Attorney did drop the case. The mobilehome residents of this city have been denied due process in a criminal case because of the City Attorney's action. The mobilehome owners have been subjected to unreasonable seizures of their property upon the sale of their mobilehnmes, a violation of the Fourth Amendment. This illegal siezure of property could not have happened without the conspiracy and cooperation of the City of Rohnert Park. Upon the sale of a mobilehome, the title company is required by law to write to the park owner and ask if there is any unpaid rent. The park owners have been claiming this illegally accumulated "Unpaid Rent" as due upon the sale of the property. Some have put the amount in escrow. However, it is my understanding that Va1Tey Village has illegally received over $100,000.00 from this practice. Conservatively speaking, there is at least one million dollars of money illegally seized from mobilehome owners by this practice. In 1993 I had my mobilehome sold and went through an extortion attempt by the park owner. I took my case before the Rent Board on June 15, 1993, #T93-02. I claimed it was illegal for Las Casitas to get an annual general adjustment because they were in violation of the ordinance. Specifically, putting that accumulated "Unpaid Rent" on my rent bill is illegal under the ordinance: "Civil Remedies, Any landlord who demands, receives, accepts, or retains any payment of rent in excess of the maximum lawful rent, in violation of the provisions of this chapter or any rule, regulation or order hereunder promulgated, shall be liable as hereinafter provided to the homeowner/resident from whom such excessive payment is demanded, accepted, received or retained, for reasonable attorney's fees and costs, as determined by the court, plus damages in an amount not to exceed five hundred dollars or three times the amount by which the payment or payments demanded , accepted, received or retained exceeds maximum lawful rent, or whichever is greater. (Ord. 607, 1995: Ord. 494 Sec. 11, 1987)" (Definition: "demand," Law, "the asking or seeking for what is due or claimed as due.") Mayor Reilly letter -2- I brought this matter before the Rent Board because the ordinance states under Powers and Duties that "The board is empowered to settle civil claims under section 11, and seek injunctive relief under section 12." The city would never enforce these parts of the ordinance. MORE CONSPIRACY! John Flitner ruled that the "Unpaid Rent" on my bill wasn't rent, and therefore, it wasn't the city's business. THAT'S NOT WHAT THE ORDINANCE SAYS, AND TEAT'S NOT WHAT THE D.A. SAID! It is rent. The landlord cannot collect it upon the sale of a mobilehome without calling it "rent." It is not "damages" because no judgment has declared it as "damages." On June 15, 1993 when park attorney David Spangenberg stood before the rent board and asked what he should put on the rent bills if he couldn't put "Unpaid Rent," John Flitner had the nerve to tell Spangenberg publically to put on our rent bills, "Warning! Rent control may be hazardous to your health! ." I documented this, too. The City of Rohnert Park is guilty of this conspiracy to deny mobilehome residents their Civil Rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments under the RICO ACT, in short racketeering. For many years this city has been aware of what is going concerning accumulated "Unpaid Rent." I have made this situation a matter of public record by writing you over and over again. You knew you had a crook in your employ the might Mayor Art Hollingsworth said, "There has been a charge I don't know what to say - except get rid of counsel." I documented that, too. That was when I had written you that John Flitner had failed to bring into court the sixty pages of documentary proof that Valley Village had broken the Green Book contract. CONSPIRACY? YOU BET! I'M TALKING VERY SERIOUS CRIMINAL CHARGES HERE. I MEAN BEHIND BARS! I got a copy of the records from the Rent Board office, and on Las Casitas letterheads this park is illegally carrying S302,000.00 of Accumulated Rent" on their books. '"rr.- Reilly, you have twice told us at City Council meetings that the parks other than Rancho Grande refuse to settle, and you have said you intend to settle with Rancho Grande and wash your hands of the rest. I am assured by Bob Fleak who was in the courtroom at the Ninth Circuit that each of three judges asked David Spangenberg who has been the attorney of record for all the parks from the very beginning what damages he was asking of the other parks. Each time to each of those three judges Spangenberg answered that he was not asking for any damages from the other parks. AND NOW THOSE OTHER PARKS ARE REFUSING TO SETTLE? Now, Mayor Reilly, do you really think we mobilehome owners are going to sit still for what the City of Rohnert Park and Spangenberg and the park owners are trying to pull on us? THE JIG IS UP! WE'VE ONLY BEGUN TO FIGHT. I'LL SEE THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS IN JAIL WHERE THEY BELONG. Very truly yours, -°'�'Shirley_ J1-4-jL161-9 ?anarI �J� V Phone: 664-9231 cc: via certified/return receipt to City Council cc: regular mail to: Bob Fleak Jean Phillips John Sime Others hr ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS Representing City and County Governments of the San Francisco Bay A?i.CEI\JEL ABAG NOV 2. 9199 MEMO Date: November 24, 1999 CITY of 4OHNERT PART' To: City and Town Mayors COUNCIL: County Board of Supervisors Chairs and Preside s MISCELLANEOUS Regional Housing Needs Determination Contacts INERMEINEMIIIIIIIIM ;,"' t AGENDA Cc: City, Town and County Managers and Administrkfo1Y 10: IF I> Community Development and Planning Directors'COPY 10: (, From: Eugene Leong, Executive Director Ui tiz K Alex Amoroso, Senior Planner ; j. 2'‘tit". 6'4 Re: Regional Housing Needs Determination 1999 2006 Release of Preliminary Numbers This memo and attachment serves as official transmittal of the Regional Housing Needs Distribution (RHND) responsibilities for each Bay Area jurisdiction. The RHND process is a State mandate, devised to address the need for and planning of housing across a range of affordability and in all communities throughout the State. Each jurisdiction within the Bay Area(101 cities, 9 counties) is given a share of the anticipated regional housing need. The Bay Area's regional housing need is specified by the California State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), and finalized through negotiations with ABAG. The timeframe for the current RHND process is June 30, 1999 through December 31, 2006 (a seven and a half year planning period). Following extensive discussion at their November 18th meeting, the ABAG Executive Board approved the release of preliminary numbers for the RHND. Attached to this memo, you will find a table that shows the housing need responsibility that ABAG has identified for your jurisdiction, as well as other jurisdictions in your county. As required by law, this table further delineates each jurisdiction's housing need responsibility by income category. This official release of the RIND numbers initiates a 90-day review period,which begins on December 1, 1999. Each jurisdiction has the opportunity to evaluate its identified need and the distribution of that need across income categories. ABAG will evaluate and respond to all comments received from Bay Area jurisdictions. The final day for comments to be received by ABAG is February 29, 2000. Mailing Address: P.O.Box 2050 Oakland,California 94604-205C (510)464-7900 Fax:(510)464-7970 info@abag.ca.gov Location: Joseph P.Bort MetroCenter 101 Eighth Street Oakland,California 94607-4756 Following this 90-day review by the jurisdictions, a 60-day review period begins for ABAG. The ABAG review period will begin on March 1, 2000. ABAG's response to jurisdictional comments must be complete by April 28, 2000. At the end of the 90-day and 60-day time periods noted above, the ABAG Executive Board will be asked to adopt a final set of RHND numbers for each jurisdiction. After adoption of the numbers, an appeals process will be available to jurisdictions. The ABAG Executive Board will define the appeals process, and the resulting procedures will be made available to all jurisdictions. ABAG is currently setting dates, places and times for several RHND informational meetings around the region. Notification of these meetings will be available on the ABAG web-site in early December. We are tentatively planning for these meetings to take place in early January. Staff will be available at these meetings to answer questions related to this process, the methodology and other general questions. Jurisdiction specific questions, comments and concerns should be directed to: ABAG Alex Amoroso, Senior Planner P.O. Box 2050 Oakland, CA 94604-2050 510.464.7955 AlexA@abag.ca.gov RHND information is available for review and download on the abagOnline web-site at: www.abag.ca.gov/planning/housingneeds/index.htm The RHND Information packet includes: • A distribution of numbers to all Bay Area Jurisdictions. • A description of the methodology used to distribute the RHND numbers to each community. • State Housing Element Law 65580-65589.8 regulations pertaining to this RHND process. • A schedule/calendar of dates and timeframes for this process. • Executive Board RHND PowerPoint Presentation,November 18, 1999. N.. RED S D ETE RMI NATI N S 1999-2006 Housing Element Period x.... 6 • '* ".• . ' •,. • 41e ‘' lit 4r-* - ASSOCIATON OF tof , BAY AREA - . • ' -. . _ 4..., • ' .1.' , . k -. GOVERNMENTS te, _ ...g .• ,, • • * lit^4. * IlhArk 4 . .:,. ...* . _ • _ - :' •• "14 — :,..., `4•,-;•-• _,- ,, -414.4,1-.,_ •_, , 1 . Itt, -::,,- .--.•:•0.,.. , a.3-='"It, zj Sib t_,- 11..';; , -:,- P` 4.1111111111"" •gebi 't. ---r-,--.....3 ii---- -,.. ., ..to,.-IS ki k TION REVIEW -• '-i .--,. . - t - • losi SA N F RAN CI SCO , ., ,,... , . ,, , ,.., _, -70ecember 1, 1999 .14--*4 ,P:i'll4i.i ' ' k‘ •• '... fittk. il:, BAY AREA . -..,., , ..• .... . . . . , . .. •,. - • . . • .. ; ..t,. , • • ,. , . . :11410€4 I ousing Needs .,, Association of -..: 0 ABAGBay Area Governments HCD Regional Housing Need 4 ABAG Regional Housing Needs Determination Construction Need Distributed By Income Category 230,743 1999-2006 Housing Element Period Sonoma County 20.6% 11.6% 25.9% 41.9% Jurisdiction Regional Allocation of Very Low Low Moderate Above Average Yearly HCD Units Moderate Need CLOVERDALE 412 93 . • ��52 124 144 55' 22 5°k .,_:.: 125%. -- 30.0°l0.":. . . 35.0% COTATI 482 96 55 140 191 64 20.0% 1 1.4% 29.1% 39.5% HEALDSBURG 592 116 83 176:' :218 ° .. 79 , >E.• 19 6% .� , ,.13 9% 29 7%;- 36,8%. PETALUMA 596 108 67 162 260 79 18.1% 1 1.2% 27.1% 43.7% ROHNERT PARK 879 vAt At � '15."YZs 245 ; 352 -� r. M> :.. ° 18: 13�1 e, 27 9%% TA. 40�1% , - SANTA ROSA 5,464 1,101 712 1,502 2,150 729 20.2% 13.0% 27.5% 39.3% SEBASTOPOL �157` _.; 20 .. 43 61�.; 2= 212% 13.0% 27.3% 38.61:0 SONOMA 578 124 78 157 219 77 21.4% 13.5% 27.2% 37.9% 't 2 W. Myna. 9 `3-E 3",4a°'&4 -.'"E' .wy�. WINDSOR 3;471 :930 s1,41,8 ') , " Unincorporated 1 1 2,522 2,186 2,969 5,364 1,739 19.3% 16.8% 22.8% 41.1 Total-Incoriiorated 12,632 C 2,561 1,582 3,480 5,017 1,684 3,768 6,449 10,381 3 423 ma County Total . 25,672 , SI • ' It \ , ' ,. it ': C\l, 1\,, 3,. •Iteg ;e:- a ousing Needs ABAG Associat f ion a '4,4E) Bay Area Regional Housing Needs jurisdictional Review Numbers Governments i d s ` './ N -4 \ A , .,---- \ ,, tsi . ,) '1, .,‘ )- . •'' _ c-, \.x 'j<____ _.4 -_ J T ._ ,,, J -- 1 a .0.-) ,,_ , Y 1 y t _ ,, , ,-.-4).7_: ..= _ ,. _ , (.....) \\ _ ,......s,.,„: co ,.....• ----' i - ,..) co t - b-mo o -ti o> 2-.v)T. 'o o - -a ra eecp ° 000.2s .g . '3u0o = 2,2EF, .et z -8 ‘...-z 0•Ei 4 ,.... c° .C" y 3a°e 0 aaM ° w= "v•2 o 6 Q. ,.0 0 Ow y yai vai p F,A d L. O C C o j� un (O aoi •' ° ;off cod. cs ., Cnwo LA LA 7 CI m a y a, ob a, d � .+ i. ° 00E In d 3 0 �r//�� boo'° •00000042.4.: ,Mac C7qz�'d � o� , o 4 OD 1P.'1' J FO, >+Fri mi y 4 g'iai e0 bQ Q ° G oppd � w °'� a 0.0 >.a fA a >.H a H lip 0 c:14 ..).,::: ,_. = ,- e • y o Ao �_a)oaG OD o a a . o a b2; tp� p 0 .0 2 ,t 2 . 1.-1 � o.d e , o .0 'o Hti aa)i bp�p� o °tea›. a▪ 6 V O O s y > oA a'A cp= ° . a.) ° NA tom., a, p O ..� b ° t&,.doti 'a '' °' ar a, 'lac° > oa. Oo _ >'e= oao=o Wo �oo°: oaopaid °'b ad° a�i ° O a' d . a� o °400a> a'ioo fil, rgb Edawls W ~rA ° ▪ cri O d o F,q C6 e'' y I°, T y b tom.., ►� p 0 04 . c0~ I.+, ?C cC ° ", V Z 1.-4 Q00 y .0 o. .y�.6 5b O,�a •• a)c+ b d � qd a� a • m� ,o ,oa � j F. b o �`' a, . 00 AN bUa) °w ur 1111111 al .. Q °oo ° n . 1At � on$ ab 41.. A as .� aS o v l'W C.) ¢; , Non aiS O tW�.0 � > —Q y .°« LPZ , ' W ^ ° c" Q CI' 0 45 cp 'a a) ,'-' U5 Oay204U4 SOD3 wa ro RECEIVE. 411.4) DEC - 2 1999 REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD B CITY OF Building Partnerships to Provide Solutions to un4}J NCIL' E ROHNERT PART( I "-' MISCELLAN OUS U ' , November 23, 1999 COMMUNICATIONS `�1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS _` Laurence Sterling AGENDA ■ P Pesdenf Vineyards COPY TO: ■ Ken Kushner Dear City of Rohnert Park City Council: COPY TO: ■ FISH of Santa Rosa Vice President Teresa McManus As I am sure you are aware, the Redwood Empire Food Bank and the KFTY/TV50 University of California Cooperative Extension have just released a report Vice President on hunger in Sonoma County. This report, Hunger in Sonoma County, is Mary Ann Breidenich O.P Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital the result of extensive surveys of families and individuals receiving food Treasurer from community agencies throughout the county. Sharon Rhodes American Red Cross Secretary Enclosed you will find a copy of the Hunger report. We felt that the Rob Anderson complete report would be of interest to you. Key findings of the report Bank of America include: Heather Brandeburg Health Plan of the Redwoods ➢ 40% of all recipients are children Paul St.Vincent De Paul > 18% of these children are going to bed hungry according to their Don Burns parents Randal Nutritionals > 44% of parents go without food so their children can eat Joe Dietzen > 8% of all recipients are seniors National Bank P of the Redwoods > 31% of households receiving food are working families Linda Garcia ➢ 35% of all recipients are putting off medical care because they U.C.Cooperative Extension cannot afford it Lucy Hensley ➢ Local food assistance programs are serving23,000 people on a Senior Gleaners P g P P Bruce Kelm monthly basis Merrill Lynch Bill Moore The study compares the current findings with those of the first local PG&E(Retired) hunger report published in 1986. It also includes recommendations Bill McWhinney regarding what can be done in order to further alleviate hunger in our Kaiser Aluminum(Retired) community. Sharon Malm Read Catholic Charities Rev.Anthony Ross If you have any questions or would like more information, please call me Diocese of Santa Rosa or Jean Larson, Development Manager, at 523-7900. We welcome your Paul Schroth comments. Senior Gleaners Shana White Sincerely, Hewlett-Packard Executive Director Michael Flood Michael Flood Executive Director 3320 Industrial Drive, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 A Chad*Portion Telephone (707) 523-7900 Facsimile (707) 523-7901 NATIONAL FOOD BANK NETWORK r) c, CD cD . r6199C,Th n C r r Ft; Meeting Notices — Please Post Ea� C µ0,NN Sonoma County z N Children and Families First Commission Sonoma County's Proposition 10 Commission Date: December 15, 1999 Time: 5:30 to 8:30 p.m. Location: Dept. of Health Services Rotunda g 2� 3313 Chanate Rd., Santa Rosa The Commission's agenda will include the following items for discussion and possible action: ➢ Strategic planning process, including presentation of priorities from the Community Advisory Committee, and comments on priorities by the Technical Resource Committee ➢ Implementation activities update, including planning budget revisions and staffing projections ➢ Report on Children and Families State Commission activities, including report back from Nov. 22 local commissions meeting in Sacramento Technical Resource Committee Date: December 7, 1999 Time: 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. Location: Dept. of Health Services Rotunda 3313 Chanate Rd., Santa Rosa Final agendas will be posted at the Board of Supervisors (575 Administration Drive, Suite 100A, Santa Rosa) and at the Department of Health Services, Prevention and Planning Division (1030 Center Drive, Santa Rosa) 72 hours prior to the meetings. Please contact the Prevention and Planning Division to request a copy of agendas or materials in advance of the meeting. For information: Casey Morrigan, MPH Division of Prevention and Planning 1030 Center Drive, Suite C, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Ph. 707-565-6653 Fax 707-565-6619 Visit the Commission's Website at www.sonoma-county.org FAX E C�u h !a13/99 C Sonoma County Children and Families First 1030 Center Dr., Suite C, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 • 707-565-6680 December 1999 volume 6 E-mail: children@sonoma-county.org PLANNING PROCESS NEARS COMPLETION r- �� The Community Advisory Committee(CAC)is in the final stages of developing its priority recommendations for the Commission's consideration. The Committee's ad hoc task groups . ' 1 ` ,• (Child Care and Education, Child Welfare,Health, and Parent Support and Education) presented their preliminary recommendations to the CAC and the Commission in mid- November. During the latter part of the month each ad hoc task group will complete its deliberations,based on received from the Commission, CAC and the Technical Resource Committee. Ad hocs will then present their recommendations to the CAC which will finalize its prioritized list of recommendations for the Commission. All Ir Ad Hoc members are encouraged to contact chairs to confirm Ad Hoc Meeting schedules. All CAC and Commission meetings are open to the public. S COMMISSION TO HOLD PUBLIC PARENTS SPEAK OUT - HEARINGS ON DRAFT PLAN S) During the month of November, the Community While exact times and locations have yet to be Advisory Committee(CAC) sponsored seven Parent .... finalized, the Sonoma County CFFC gave the go Speakouts. The public was invited to Speakouts in ahead to schedule a series of 5 public hearings on its Cloverdale, Guerneville, Petaluma, and Sonoma. The draft strategic plan. Planned for February 5 through remaining three were held at the Head Start program in February 12, the hearings will take place at locations the South Park area of Santa Rosa, the Women's 0 throughout the county. During the hearings the Recovery program at the Drug and Alcohol Alternatives Commission will review the draft plan and hear Center(DAAC), and with a teen mothers support comments and suggestions from members of the program. Two additional Speakouts are planned for Npublic. Information on the public hearings can be December with Head Start parents in Petaluma and in obtained by contacting the Division of Prevention and Rohnert Park. . Planning at 565-6680 or by visiting the Commission's .M.. web site at www.sonoma-county.org. At the Speakouts, parents were asked to identify the things they most need to raise safe, healthy and -, successful children. Here are some of the things they PROP 10 RECALL MAKES BALLOT ; told us: physical safety in parks; California State Secretary of State Bill Jones i n safe housing; 6 : • announced on October 27 that a recall initiative 1,- compassion and respect from medical professionals; entitled, "Repeal of Additional Tobacco Surtax 1 n geographic access to play opportunities and parent Enacted by Proposition 10, "qualified for the March i education; 7,2000 primary election ballot. This initiative would 1 n site-based, quality child care; completely do away with Proposition 10 and the 1 n respite child care; California Children and Families Act and eliminate 1 safe, convenient, child friendly transportation; the approximately$5 million a year Sonoma County 1 i parent education on normal child development; A will receive under the Act to provide early 14 �. 4, I n and basic needs assistance. childhood development services to _N i Sonoma County children 0 to 5 years '''z: 4.Nil i 1 of age. For more information on the j !!►/ i Information from the Speakouts is being used by the recall initiative, visit www.wwlc.org. 7; 1 CAC to develop its recommendation for the i 1 ' I Commission's Strategic Plan. +'0 .�0`.t/ .•r 7 t .�•0.Z TO•0•4.�i ei*i�1 . �i i i i <<! t 4 4 ! t i t / ! ! 1 t t d t 4 1 ! ! 1 1 ! t t ! t ! t t 4 4 ! 1 4 t t t i IT t i i ; f From the staf of The Prop. 10 Commission, have a healthy and safe holiday! {� e..--- ... l d ,i Ti ;'4 'b •i 4 i d;�� ; Th Tl�i w Ti 4 i i 4�k i i t 4 �'i t t t l ! t t ! t t l t ! ! ! 4 / t ! ! ! I t 4 4 / t ! t t ! t t t l / t l t t t t t . . YEiaS �� C:EIVEE League of California Cities 711 rho [timed California(hies If c 1400 K Street 4. I898-1998 41.. -�' 1999 Sacramento,CA 95814 COUNCIL: 916.658.8200 9rWNG To ILTIN"() MISCELLANEOUS FAX 916.658.8240 Better Cities—A (letter Life PO,HNERT PA.R14 www.cacities.org COMMUNICATIONS k( AGENDA COPY TO: `( �" 5 e)‹ November 29, 1999 COPY TO: 1 )k- *1 (4-- /Pr' 6147't 31)111 UR) I To: Mayors and City Managers C. Lei vo T. Barry From: John Ferraro, League President L. Braun President, Los Angeles City Council J . Gaffney M. Grice M. Harrow Subject: League Board Acts to Increase Legislative Effectiveness; P. Robbi ns Dues will increase by 5% P. Rooney W. Schulenburg Increase legislative effectiveness through lobbying, research and technology. B. Stephens In recognition of cities' strong desires for increased legislative effectiveness, the board of directors adopted a work program and spending plan to bolster this critical program area. The plan is to focus on three major areas of activity which will work together to increase the influence cities and the League exert on legislative deliberations. These areas are lobbying, research and technology. (For details, see the attached summary of new or enhanced programs.) Strategic plan will guide future changes in League services. The board will conduct a strategic planning process in 2000 to ensure that League services and policies are well conceived and properly targeted to strengthen cities and the League in the twenty-first century. One objective of this process will be to identify "stuff to stop" and ways to stretch your dues dollars. City officials will have an opportunity to participate in the strategic planning process directly and through their representatives on the board of directors. One-year budget bridges transition. The board adopted a one-year budget for the year 2000. This departs from the policy of having two-year budgets. The one-year format will allow the board to assess the effectiveness of changes made in emphasis and staffing levels, and to implement the strategic plan with a new two-year budget next year. Expanded legislative program requires a dues increase. Two key things are needed-from-cities.to-achieve the goal of increased legislative effectiveness. First,.actiye participation by city officials is essential in the development of major statewide policies, and in grassroots lobbying efforts on key bills. Second, the ambitious work plan for 2000 requires an increased financial commitment. To address this second need, the budget approved by the lioard includes a five percent dues increase. About the.League Dues. ---•- League dues follow a sliding,scale based upon city population. With the intent of being as accurate and fair as possible, the League bylaws provide that, for membership dues purposes, "the population-of each city shall be the population determined by the State Controller in making the most recent allocation of subventions to cities." This ensures dues are consistent with a city's ability to pay. For dues to keep pace with inflation, the board must increase dues. This is because the dues formula does not provide for automatic revenue growth by taking into account changes in the cost of living or increased economic activity, as city revenue sources do. The five percent dues increase in 2000 is needed to allow the League to undertake this expanded work program to achieve increased legislative effectiveness. League bylaws allow cities the opportunity to ratify the board's action to increase dues through action of the regional divisions. This ratification process will occur during the next 60 days, and dues statements will be sent to all cities following the divisions' actions. Committee will review League bylaws and dues. A committee of the board will review the League's bylaws and organizational policies during the coming year. The committee's charge is to consider a wide variety of issues, including the dues schedule and structure. Recommendations for change will be presented to the board and ultimately to the membership for consideration prior to the 2000 annual conference. In conclusion: The year 2000 is a time of transition for the League: a new millennium, a new executive director, and a new opportunity to address some troublesome and complex issues affecting the future of home rule and the fiscal integrity of city governments. Through the League, all city officials have the opportunity to help shape solutions to the issues of greatest importance to our cities and the state of California. Our organization is strong. It is financially sound. It includes participation from every city in California. More than ever, it is important for cities to act energetically, in unison, and with renewed focus to amplify our voice in legislative matters. This plan will move us forward in a significant way. g:\mss\member\rid\budg001\dueslet2.doc 2 THE 2000 LEAGUE BUDGET: INCREASING THE LEAGUE'S LEGISLATIVE EFFECTIVENESS • The League board of directors adopted an ambitious budget to guide League services and finances in 2000. The board's overall objective is to increase legislative effectiveness through changes in three major areas of activity. Lobbying—The League will make the biggest expansion of lobbying efforts ever by: • Hiring one new lobbyist, the first such increase in over a decade. • Adding two new legislative research positions. These researchers will allow the League to conduct focused research on issues of immediate legislative importance and mobilize the membership for timely grassroots efforts. • Undertaking a major project to assess and improve the systems and strategies used for grassroots lobbying. • Fostering a closer relationship with constituency groups, which will help with educational programs, involvement with policy development and legislative issues. • Retaining flexibility to engage contract lobbyists to work with key legislators on priority issues, if the need arises. Research—In 2000, the League will expand the amount and quality of research undertaken to support policy positions adopted by city officials by: • Hiring two new legislative researchers, as mentioned above. • Funding a major research report on the fiscal condition of California cities to support our telling the"city story"about the impact of state decisions on local services. • Providing core funding for the Institute for Local Self Government to undertake major research projects like the"Takings"project and other comparable projects. Technology—The League will become a leader in the effective and practical application of technology to further the interests of cities by: • Developing an information technology strategic plan for the League with assistance from city IT experts. • Investing in technology that will increase the effectiveness and timeliness of communications and legislative and grassroots activities. • Substantially expanding the use of CITYLINK 2000, the League's Internet website. • Creating a new on-line service for city attorneys containing a searchable database of publications and information, links to other relevant sites, etc. If successful, this effort will lead to similar services for other professional departments of the League. After the service is in place, subscription fees by users should cover the costs of maintaining the service. g:\mss\member\rid\budg00I\dueslet2.doc 3 GENERAL FUND REVENUES Corporate Partners Interest/Other Contracts 2% 5 10% Exposition 7% Dues 46% Conferences and Institutes 30% GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES Board/Executive Legal Services Administration 3% 11% Customer Services 18% Education 37% Communications Policy Developments% Lobbying 6 17% G:VNSs\MEMBER\RID\BUDG001\PROGBDOO.XLS 4 1999 AND 2000 DUES SCHEDULES (Represents a 5% increase) For cities having a population of: 1999 Dues 2000 Dues 1 to 500 . . . $ 34 $ 35 501 to 600 . . . 90 94 601 to 700 . . . 181 190 701 to 800 . . . 198 208 801 to 900 . . . 237 248 901 to 1,000 . . . 290 304 1,001 to 1,250 . . . 453 476 1,251 to 1,500 . . . 560 588 1,501 to 1,750 . . . 666 699 1,751 to 2,000 . . . 793 832 2,001 to 2,250 . . . 845 887 2,251 to 2,550 . . . 935 982 2,501 to 2,750 . . . 989 1,039 2,751 to 3,000 . . . 1,078 1,132 3,001 to 4,000 . . . 1,207 1,267 4,001 to 5,000 . . . 1,439 1,511 5,001 to 7,500 . . . 1,873 1,966 7,501 to 10,000 . . . 2,162 2,271 10,001 to 15,000 . . . 2,610 2,741 15,001 to 20,000 . . . 3,006 3,156 20,001 to 25,000 . . . 3,763 3,951 25,001 to 30,000 . . . 4,519 4,745 30,001 to 40,000 . . . 5,562 5,840 40,001 to 50 Q00 . . . 6,767 (-7,105 _ `50,001 to 60,000 . . . 7,795 8,185 60,001 to 70,000 . . . 8,567 8,995 70,001 to 80,000 . . . 8,998 9,448 80,001 to 90,000 . . . 9,592 10,072 90,001 to 100,000 . . . 10,509 11,035 100,001 to 125,000 . . . 11,985 12,584 125,001 to 150,000 . . . 13,192 13,851 150,001 to 200,000 . . . 14,993 15,743 200,001 to 500,000 15,744 16,531 Plus 751 789 per each full 10,000 of population over 200,001 Over 500,000 38,217 40,128 Plus 694 729 per each full 10,000 of population over 500,001 In no event shall the annual dues for any city exceed $50,000, and no city's dues shall increase by more than $5,000 per year. g:\mss\mem ber\rid\budg989\d ues9899.xIs 5 Council: I X w Date By Miscellaneous r a R : �/ Continua • x a .If at Netter, Joseph Pu % Agenda/nook—� Ag From: ted_shimkowski©agilent.com O Copy to: Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 11:49 AM Copy to: To: Jnetter@rpcity.org Subject: Proposed Bridge at Five Creek Hello Mr. Netter, 12/2/99 I am sending you this letter to express my extreme dissatisfaction with the recent late notice of a proposed bridge over Five Creek. As a resident who lives only 200 yards from this proposed bridge, I am very angry that proper notifications were not sent to residents that live near this area. Ten years ago, I was the person who presented a signed petition indicating the local neighbors did NOT want a bridge at this location. Currently, the creek acts as a natural deterrent to any undesirables who want to casually wander our neighborhood. Because of this, the residents can quickly recognize anyone who does or does not belong in our neighborhood. I'm at a loss to understand why the city council must keep resurrecting projects that have been overwhelmingly turned down by the local neighborhood just because of a special interest group. If some means of casual crossing is necessary, then a simple concrete ford at the bottom of the channel would be sufficient and save the city's limited budget for other more pressing projects. Again, I urge you to recommend this project be permanently dropped from the city plan and I plan on attending the City Council meeting on Dec. 14 to reinforce this point. Respectfully, Ted & Dianna Shimkowski 614 Holly Ave. Rohnert Park Council: X Date By Miscellaneous Netter, Joseph Communications < z.mo.t 6� 4b�p igy.f —� Agenda 42 *9 J From: wayne/nancy thush [wayneandnancyt@rodigy. et Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 1:48 PM Copy to: To: RP City Hall Copy to: Subject: Five Creek Bridge I live at 4400 Hollingsworth Ct here in RP and have just been advised that, without notifying any of the nearby residents, the Planning Commission has approved a bridge to span Five Creek at the west end of Holly St. This has a major, negative impact on me and all my neighbors. We do not want anything built there until we are notified of any plans & until we have input as to what, if anything, should go there. We pretty much like our neighborhood the way it is now. I cannot attend a City Council meeting on Dec 14th, SO PLEASE PUT A HALT TO NONSENSE NOW so we can have some input. M.Wayne Thush 586-8321 U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of the Census Council: , X Date By City of Miscellaneous R O H N E R T Larry Esparta Communications X l2/g194 a.� ' Administrative Manager ` ,s Agenda hl • Phone:(707)527-0122 'a'T,a` Fax:(707)527-0435 Copy to: 0-f= �( /,� 1$�a .• Copy to: /11 K jX= � y.; Scrota Rosa Local Census Office l �, r 585 W.College Ave.,Suite A c. ,�` cL -c Santa Rosa,CA 95401 ` - ;,,y� ) Census 2000 r` F., 4 Email:SE2728AMA@ccmail.census.gov 4:,, Fact Sheet for City Council Appointments to Commissions, Boards, or Committees City Council Tames J. Reilly,Jr. DATE: /2.- 6 -' Mayor NAME: L A RE'IQ C E Esoar z II Residence Telephone#: ! 8`% - S 2 ? Vicki Vidak- Address: y Li V t e O! C:1 IC. R, Pk,C Business Telephone#: Z 7- O 12 . Martinez Vice Mayor Employer: ?S , O>✓irr ki`r M CJ,,, trtc c Address: 5?S Lj. 0�1 lac z i V c Armando F. Flores Type of Business: RU(.'F A(., (4-t4•1 C F ZU.S SA?)---)9 '1k,DS )4 1 CA 9 E i O/ Jake Mackenzie Linda Spiro Specific work performed: hel M +AJ,‘,;YtA-rio,..) M 4",4-0 i .". Councilmembers Year graduated from high school: 19 7 ' Degrees: 5Sv c-17"'L `/-r¢r(._ Are you a current registered voter in Rohnert Park? 3-Yes Q No Joseph D.Netter Year you became a Rohnert Park resident: 1 9 'L{ City Manager List activities in clubs,associations, etc.: \-�tspa"..-)t c. C(1.-11,,,. L - , .e Cam,,, ..4 4,1_ ( c c. r Ste__ci__4 CO„.. ; - TO WHICH BODY DO YOU PREFER APPOINTMENT? (Commission, Board or Committee) Q ,.....1-z Q..)-;col 30 4 Indicate reasons for your interest in appointment: C�4)c z"rz. '--U1� tn., a V Fcr,, t'r 1 LT f'J/-�7.'.Lass, -.-) .-,4` W-c �i Cn-1-4-ru I 1 s 5.}Sfy- , / / i : /� 1 i"`' 14 v>�c 101 'r A,n.,-? r fJ/- .k w,lU ,ni XL...T to J r „...v c.Z i J.F-c.?s+,sfi' -(4 -t;. Please provide any additional information, qualifications, and/or references if you so desire. You may use other side of this form. 177 7 ft 1 vl c.t Pars+du_t- c'c - !-..,...1 c 1,apT4„ m f rtts Goid,„, S% £ 444,4);It hoavtt o,.,,,A.1 1,25 Jq ra j..r , /Kic t a rovedCouncil -3 7 --' (Form7 _ pp byCity 1ty /5/ 5). S. ature 6750 Commerce Boulevard • Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486 • (707) 588-2226 • Fax (707) 588-2274 SONOMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY i' N\° AGENDA • CO C // 19g� December 13, 1999 ��� �il�y9'�FOei\�Nti�EA� Permit and Resource Management Department 1p. 2550 Ventura Avenue Planning Commission Hearing Room 14 � r Santa Rosa, California //4. Directors ITEM , 2-149 Sharon Wright,Chair I. Public Comment • r. SANTA ROSA Mike Cale,V.Chair II. Consent Item —ACTION SONOMA COUNTS Phyllis Carter A. Minutes of the November 8,1999 Meeting sorrow, orchard Cuilinen III. Closed Session —Contract negotiations with Executive Director Rob IV. Reports - INFORMATION/ACTION C LOVERDALE IIDALC David Keller A. Executive Committee Report, Closed Session Report (Chair Wright) P[TALuw B. NCRA Report (Director Jehn) 'eke Mackenzie C. SCTA Staff Report ROMNlRT PMR Mike Reilly 1. SCTA Administrative Issues (Suzanne Wilford, Executive Director) SONO MA COUNTY 2. MTC Activities (Suzanne Wilford, Executive Director) Laity Robinson 2. CAC Report (Bob Anderson, Chair) SEBASTOPOL Sam 3. TAC Report (Allan Tilton, Chair) rh"Ds°" 4. Legislation (Suzanne Wilford, Executive Director) Tim Smith SONOMA COUNTY V. Update on Caltrans Projects— DISCUSSION/ACTION 'u ZI•°rich A. Wilfred to Route 12 Project B. Route 12 to Steele Lane C. Rohnert Park Expressway VI. Cycle Two Federal Funding Process— DISCUSSION/ACTION A. Scoring Criteria B. Call for Projects VII. March 2000 Ballot Measures— DISCUSSION/ACTION SCTA Staff VIII. Vision 2020 Final Draft— DISCUAAION/ACTION Suzanne Wilford E,,rc,.m E DIRECTOR IX. Countywide Transportation Plan Update— DISCUSSION/ACTION Sonoma County Transportaiton Authority X. Rohnert Park General Plan Update— DISCUSSION/ACTION 2550 Ventura Avenue Santa Rosa CA 95403 Phone:527-1943 Fax:527-1103 XI. Authority Member Comments XII. Adjournment—ACTION The next SCTA meeting will be held on January 10, 2000 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-MINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P O BOX 23660 OAKLAND,CA 94623-0660 (510)286-4444 }, TDD(510)286-4454 RECEIVED {T 1ED tl� � ,aa DEC = 6 1999 December 1, 1999 CITY T PARS HpHNER. COUNCIL: 1111 Ms. Suzanne Wilford MISCELLANEOUS Executive Director COMMUNICATIONS ,: Sonoma County Transportation Authority j AGEND m • . ` 2550 Ventura Avenue ;,; Xr _ � oq �Yp Santa Rosa, California 95403 It 6 ° ),T I.. Dear Ms. Wilford: f /LL7 Thank you for your letter dated November 16, 1999 requesting that the Rohnert Park]ia4-6 Expressway park & ride lot and southbound loop project (EA 130211 be considered for funding from the unused portion orthe Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) funds from TEA-21. Presently, Caltrans District 4 is in the process of submitting this project as a candidate for this CMAQ funding under the State Highway Operation and Protection Program/Traffic Operations Program Strategic Plan (SHOPP/TOPS) for fiscal year 2002/2003 for the funding shortfall. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Saaid Fakharzadeh at (510) 286-6011 or Robert Gong at(510) 286-5667. Sincerely, HA Y.YAHATA Dis 'ct Di ector By D A E STEINHAUSER District Division Chief Division of Design East cc: Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey Senate Pro Tern John Burton Assembly Member Kerry Mazzoni Council Member Jake Mackenzie, Rohnert Park Joe Gaffney, Rohnert Park Craig Goldblatt, MTC RN '� COTATI-ROHNERT PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT C ]t1EI-,.' COUNCIL: MISCELLANEOUS 111 DEC _ 7 1999COMMUNICATIONS FPI December 6, 1999 CITY OF AGENDA AO :40HNiERT PARK COPY TO: P`. Members of the City Council COPY TO: II 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Ilitio v 56414, the CityCouncil, phipm16.404,14,4' ke(411 f 01 editi Dear Members of As you may be aware the Rancho Cotate Varsity Volleyball team just won the championship in the North Bay League. The team also took second place in North Coast Section, qualifying for the state championship series. We did lose in the first round of state but had a / fabulous season. In years past, the City Council generously purchased - team photo plaques for each member of the team as well as the coach, athletic director and principal of the high school. We had championships in '81, '82, '83, '84, '86 and '88 but then we experienced a "dry spell" for ten years. In 1998 we won another championship but I had forgotten about the beautiful plaques. Well, this year I remembered! So, I'm here again to ask your help in honoring the girls of the 1999 Championship volleyball team. I have enclosed a flyer of the plaque that you have purchased for us in the past. The Neff Company gave me a quote of $26.00 per plaque ($390.00 total). Fifteen plaques would provide recognition to those girls who have brought honor, pride and spirit to our school and community. Thank you for your consideration in purchasing these plaques for the Rancho Cotate Varsity Volleyball team and staff. Please feel free to contact me if need be (525-74759 29#). Sincerely, c L2C-t,rL-K-eL_, . Donna McKenna Varsity Volleyball Coach RANCHO COTATE HIGH SCHOOL 5450 Snyder Lane ■ Rohnert Park,CA 94928 • Phone(707)792-4750 ■ Fax(707)792-4758 ■ Guidance 792-4768 ! Attendance 792-4761 <1: . .. • 6 I L Q�t r j3 1111 y if vt ' i R ,a g , . to -zR dz)ts -)ves ., Z ,5t4 .1 . ' • )4 ''F,2 .. "" . I Eli ' ,“ " ..' v;.. 1- 3 r (jxa : ,)4. 5.ggy, t ,e s ZC03ib es !I_{i1,1 s . �x ' GF.: f. i.$CO ).0-. . -,,*0 tc.•) r 4. 1 = 3 a 'fir• t=-1 '. K'ac °: E t-f. t '.tj4" it Efja ' iitt ;r a F. s1f $ �«' s `� 'Mk; ;ITL i J C 1. a112 -' , '.--40.--_,A....gt)-- ,...40-41 e--, , 1 {{ r ::: 6‹ • •'• .4-,, as.. ✓"(;:1 pt;F § • t ""--.exe.R-.,c e _ _ '`�• ;.. _ •SS.: }k tt ' f . co a $ 3 , : :s A.-. 1't�t •� ; • 4. � ' $ x. 0' ' R< --aaas:.�ca'zata�i ._ $ ,r, .�.. t?ska s> m-.4 ,tkkoxr : l' •gr• Jg i ip-4 a.. f c ,* fi�xe,.` .�a } �' .Iya ` " p1 `. {WS .g n"''� Y a ? 1�K $ _ g e 4�`' to, ps lii:tea i�t n ass eit .4 j lt' • !•r`.qit , r t•i X "-,' +�+ <t t. 4: 3 S,J*al: a .. :t 1+, ,= 43--•-, G ; 3� b }ate �zi $. t# G - , v.,:=,-,. acxaa s fansn 5� ~$A 3R s'pF ': a IL i.,i. i� . 6 • . ....INN ; ,. f ,-Alc:. p �+—. tasnJsstaaelS:: a£,. sb ° .. b SMART (SONOMA/MARIN AREA RAIL TRANSIT) COMMISSION a. .... AGENDA RECEIVED c - December 15, 1999 DEC j I999 'v 0-i-A-14 6 1 13/g9 R 2:00 PM Ciro°OF ROHNERT PARK Petaluma Community Center 320 North McDowell Boulevard, Petaluma I. Call To Order II. Minutes of the October 6, 1999 SMART Meeting — DISCUSSION/ACTION III. Public Comments on Items Not on the Agenda IV. Working Paper#5 Selecting a Preferred Alternative — DISCUSSION/ACTION V. Other Issues - DISCUSSION VI. Next Steps - DISCUSSION VII. Adjournment—ACTION The Sonoma/Marin Rail Implementation Plan is sponsored by: Marin County * Metropolitan Transportation Commission Sonoma County Transportation Authority * Federal Transit Administration LuuN L: ' MISCELLANEOUS '� t3'� 4 COMMUNICATIONS ��. AGENDA COPY TO: COPY TO: ,UUIUVIL. • MISCELLANEOUS � RECEIVED COMMUNICATIONS m y.i+ DEC 131999 AGENDA/ CITY OF Dear City Council ,., :vele and i Man. • -s TO. OHNERT PARK 'Y � . I am writing t�� •: - - - propose• Bicycle/ pedestrian bridge across Five Creek that you have on your December 14, 1999 agenda. It has recently come to our attention by a neighbor, and just a few days ago a letter from the city explaining this proposal. We have not been given 30 days notice or any public notice prior to it coming up for a vote before the city council. This is unfair to the residents of this neighborhood to vote on something that will alter our neighborhood access and environment drastically. We asked that you either vote against the proposition to build a bridge, or in the least, give the neighborhood at least thirty days in which to respond. Because of the holiday season and many community events this time of year, it is difficult for residents to give up family, school, and community events to attend this City Council meeting, or to adequately prepare a defense argument against the building of this proposed bridge. Several of our neighbors are in the process of obtaining signatures on a petition to stop construction or a yes vote on this proposal. Approximately ten years ago a similar proposal came to our attention, when the city wished to build a vehicle bridge across the creek. We obtained a signature from every resident in both the "H" and the "F" sections that this would immediately affect. It was decided then by the city to not pursue a bridge across the creek. What was decided was a small concrete three foot or smaller walk way for pedestrians. Nothing more nothing less for just the immediate neighbors use. Now without our knowledge or approval something similar has been proposed by the Bicycle Committee. How many people are on this committee, and how much state money do they have to spend? Should this Bicycle Committee be allowed to determine a neighborhood's access and configuration that will alter it's safety and ambiance? I contend that a minor group of bicyclists should not have this advantage. Let us look at the pros and cons of such a construction project. Pros 1. A undetermined number of bicyclists, motorcyclists, and pedestrians will have access from Fauna to Holly Ave. along a nice scenic neighborhood route. In addition they will have access to Santa Rosa Ave. and Snyder Ave. via this route. Whoops, this second point should be in my negative or con column! Cons 1. Attractive nuisance- a. This may promote a gathering spot for juvenile who are unchaperoned and in a secluded area as seen in Jud Snyder's picture in the voice. b. this will promote easy access to all homes backing up to the golf course for possible criminal behavior. c. This project will promote children using the bridge for use of there skateboards, bicycles and other transportation modes such as roller blades. If they are in an unsupervised user friendly area and become injured, then telephones and greater access by ambulances will be needed. d. The more attractive the area, the more it will be used. The less attractive it is, the better we parents can convince our children to stay away from it, especially when they are greeted by mud in the winter there. e. My oldest son has found Playboy magazines, alcoholic beverage containers there a few years back, and now my sons say that it is a spot where they have seen drugs being purchased! Do we want to promote more people using this creek? f. We have three known drug dealers in our neighborhood, and I have spotted many undesirable looking youths and adults walking through the creek to these drug dealers homes. Do we want to make access easier for them? 2. City Interests- a. In order to build and maintain the bridge, the current 6' cyclone fence and gate will have to be removed, which will allow greater access that is currently restricted by the gate. b. This project will bring more traffic from a commercial area, to a residential area. c. Holly Ave. is a narrower street than Fauna Ave., and any bridge and through traffic will be affected by the size difference. d. The city put up a sign on Holly into the circle area that says "Not a Through Street'. Doesn't this show the willingness of the city to keep this area as a minor traffic area and not promote more traffic through both sides of the creeks areas? ( Incidentally, great Police and Fire emergency equipment access is not needed here as evidenced by the Fire departments quick response to a house fire on Hickory Way from the Country Club Fire Station and "M" section station, from Country Club Dr. to Fairway north to Holly then on around to Hickory. This is the quickest route. If there is a need for emergency vehicles in "F" section, then it would be quickest to dispatch along Country Club, west on Fairway and around to Fauna, etc.) 3. Other Interested Parties- a. This will promote access to Mountain Shadows Golf course fairways which is privately owned or by the city, and will promote after hours unsupervised use of the course, it's walkways and property. Which if an injury occurs on this property, will be open for litigation as partial liability. b. This bridge will block access to the creek area for the water agency to clear out debris, overgrowth, and garbage which could obstruct the natural flow of water to empty the areas drains to prevent flooding. c. This will give people access to state water ways which are strictly managed by the state water department, and any alteration or obstruction will be greatly objected to by them. 4. Criminal Activity- a. This gives bicyclists and pedestrians easy access to the back yards of many peoples homes which could result in criminal behavior. b. Mr. MacKenzie, do you remember what happed to your bike when it was stolen and Leff Brown witnessed it's seizure and subsequent flight along a creek path on Hillview? Won't this give vandals more opportunity to seize other property from our neighborhood? I propose, if there is any money to be spent state, city, or otherwise that it be used to improve the existing bicycle lanes near Creekside Middle School and Mountain Shadows Middle School. On December 7th a Creekside student had his leg broken by a car on Snyder Lane. There have been at least five bicycle accidents involving students and cars along Snyder that I am aware of. There have also been numerous accidents involving Mountain Shadow students and cars. Last week a El Camino student was hit by a car near Mountain Shadows. Clearly these areas require further commitment on the city's part to promote safety of our pedestrians, bicyclists, and students along our busy thoroughfares! If any money is spent to develop bicycle paths on Rohnert Park, then it should be where it is the most needed. Clearly Snyder Lane and Southwest Blvd. with it's increased traffic, needs more attention to safe bike paths then in our small neighborhood creek area. Please use these funds where it will do the most good for our city and not for just a few! I would appreciate a response before the December 14th Council meeting as a number of my neighbors and I plan on attending the meeting and would like to know the cities and Councils attentions prior, so that we know if we may have another month to seek legal council and more neighborhood residents to voice their concerns. After hearing these concerns, why would anyone vote to build a pedestrian bridge on Five Creek? Thank you so much for your kind attention in this manner. I look forward to hearing from you soon. I know we can come to an agreement that benefits the neighborhood and all of the cities residents in this tight financial time. Sincerely, Janice Brown 4438 Hollingsworth Circle Rohnert Park, CA. 94928 707-584-9706 COUNCIL: MISCELLANEOUS yak er) COMMUNICATIONS X 301 Rio Vista Lane AGENDA Q 199` Rohnert Park, CA 94928 December 10, 1999 I COPY TO: "?Y TQ: CITY OF BO9NERT PARK Rent Appeals Board City of Rohnert Park 6750 Commerce Blvd. Rohnert Park, CA Gentlemen: Rack in 1985, you in city government tried to shove a monstrosity called the "Green Book" down our throats. Do you remember what happened? We put Ordinance #494 on the ballot and took away your power to change that ordinance. Now, you come up with changes to Ordinance #494 that make it much worse than the "Green Book" ever was, and the "Green Book" was a park-owner's dream. Do you suppose we will vomit up those proposed changes to Ordinance #494 and go back to the polls? Don't bet against it. Very truly yours, U 0 Shirley J. ��1anary certified/return receipt cc: Rohnert Park City Council via certified/return receipt CERTIFIED s angry 301 Rio Vista Ln U.S. POSTAGE Rohnert Park,CA 9 928-3932 Z 273 704 22 7 PR I ijanROHNERT PHRK.Ci 9-1928 UN/TEDS7tTES DEC 10. 'go i;7:5 sE7T,T AMOUNT MAIL 0000 $2.98 0 20070-22 Rent Appeals Board City of Rohnert Park 6750 Commerce Bvd. Rohnert Park, CA 94923