2022/12/13 City Council Resolution 2022-112 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-112
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
ACCEPTING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FOR
FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2021 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2022
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section Government Code Section 66006,
the City of Rohnert Park is required to prepare an annual report regarding the use of development
impact fees within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year; and,
WHEREAS, staff has prepared a report that contains the information required by
Government Code Section 66000 et seq., a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated by this reference; and,
WHEREAS, no refunds of development impact fees were collected pursuant to
Government Code §66001(e), nor were there any allocations of unexpended revenues collected
pursuant to Government Code §66001(f); and
WHEREAS, this report has been made available to the public not less than fifteen (15)
days from the date of the next regularly scheduled public meeting, as the report has been
available for public review at the Clerk's office and on the City's website since November 28,
2022; and,
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 66001 (d) requires a local agency to make
specific findings with respect to any unexpended funds for the fifth fiscal year, and every fifth
year thereafter, following the first deposit into the account or fund; and,
WHEREAS, the Per Acre Development Fee Fund,No. 4200 contains unexpended funds
that have been held for a period of greater than five years, requiring findings to be made under
Government Code Section 66001(d):
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert
Park that the foregoing recitals are true and correct.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find and adopt as
follows:
1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66000 et seq., the City has conducted
an annual and five-year review of its development impact fees and capital
infrastructure programs and the Council has reviewed the Development Impact Fee
Report for the fiscal year 2021-22, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is hereby
accepted and adopted as the report required pursuant to Government Code section
66006(b).
2. In accordance with Government Code section 66001(d), the City Council makes the
following findings:
A. The Per Acre Development Fee, contained in Fund No. 4200, contains fees
initially collected for the purpose of expansion of the City's water system as
made necessary to serve new development and offset related city costs; the fee
shall provide for the expansion of the City's water system, including but not
limited to production, storage, and distribution facilities and necessary
engineering and planning studies. The City now intends to spend the
remaining fee funds on its Water Tank 9, a water storage facility that benefits
new development in the City.
B. New development places demands on existing infrastructure, including the
City's water service, and will inevitably require that the water service utility
be expanded to provide capacity to support the new development. The purpose
of this fee, when originally adopted, was to offset costs of expansions of the
City's water system, as required to serve such new development. Therefore,
the fee has a reasonable relationship to purpose for which it was charged.
C. Funds available in the Per Acre Development Fee Fund, which total
$17,468.26 will be used for the Water Storage Tank 9 Pad and Retaining Wall
project(CIP2102) to expand capacity in the City's system to serve new
development. This project is also funded through the Water Capacity Charge
fee, which now supersedes the Per Acre Development Fee Fund.
D. The City began funding the Water Tank 9 Pad and Retaining Wall
Improvements Project in Fiscal Year 20-21, funding for the project has been
secured, and work is anticipated to be complete in Fiscal Year 22-23.
3. The Council hereby approves, accepts and adopts the Development Impact Fee Report
for the fiscal year 2021-22, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and makes the findings set
forth in this resolution.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 13th day of December 2022.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
J ckte ,l r , Ma
ATTEST:
Sylvia Lopes Cttcv , City Clerk
Attachments: Exhibit A \
GIUDICE:ktr. HOLLINGSWORTHADAM STAFFORD: RODRIGUEZ: ELWARD:,�(J
AYES: ( ) NOES: ) ABSENT: (ABSTAIN: (
"its
Resolution 2022-112
2
1
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
Exhibit A
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT
Fiscal Year July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022
State Law (Government Code Section 66006), requires each local agency that imposes AB 1600
development impact fees to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those
fees. Further, it stipulates that fees imposed on new development have the proper nexus to any
project on which they are imposed. Further, Government Code (GC) Section 66001 requires that
for the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the account or fund, and every five years
thereafter, the local agency shall make findings related to purpose of the fee, relationship between
the fee and the purpose for which it is charged, and identify sources and amount of funding, among
other findings.
AB 1600 imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected.
The fees must be segregated from the General Fund and from other funds or accounts containing
fees collected for other improvements. Each fund must earn its own interest and be used for the
same purpose as the fee collected. Per AB 1600, each fee collected to mitigate a specific impact
has to be spent within five years of collection. If the fee is held beyond this time frame due to
specific circumstances or insufficient collection for the needed improvements, the City Council
must make specific findings to continue holding the fees. The AB 1600 annual report shall be
completed within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, and made available to the public
at least 15 days in advance of the public meeting at which the report is presented. The following
information must be contained in the report:
• A description of the type fee in the account or fund.
• The amount of the fee.
• The beginning and ending balances of each fund for which the impact fees were collected.
• The amount of fee collected and the corresponding interest earned.
• An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amounts
expensed on each such improvement including the total percentage of the cost of the public
improvement that was funded with the fees.
• An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement
will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to
complete financing on an incomplete public improvement.
• A description of any interfund transfer, loan or any refund made for each impact fee fund
including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended,
and in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of
interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
• The amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collect to complete financing on
incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made due to
administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenue exceeded the amount to be refunded.
This report uses the term ‘five-year test’ to examine whether revenues remain in a fund after the
fifth anniversary of the first deposit into a fund, and every 5 years thereafter. If five-year rolling
annual expenditures are greater than the beginning fund balance (five years earlier), than this report
designates that the five year test is met, requiring no further findings be made under GC Section
66006(d). All funds except Fund 4200 (per acre development fee) meet the five-year test. For
Fund 4200, this report identifies projects funded in FY22-23 to meet findings of reasonableness
required by GC § 66001(a).
PER ACRE DEVELOPMENT FEE (Fund No. 4200)
2
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
This fee was established per Resolution 79-08 and repealed by Resolution 2016-112, which
adopted the City’s Water Capacity Charge (see discussion under Fund No. 3436 later in this
report).
The fee provides for the expansion of the City’s water system, including but not limited to
production, storage, and distribution facilities and necessary engineering and planning studies. For
Fiscal Year 22-23, revenue remaining in this fund will be used for purposes of constructing that
Water Tank #9 project and the fund will then be closed.
No interfund loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations were made
pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: NA – No longer collected – Fee has been superceded by the Water Capacity
Charge.
Five year test not met
The table below illustrates the expenditures from the Per Acre Development Fee Fund in Fiscal
Year 2021-22 and the planned expenditures for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
Beginning Balance 7/1/21:17,398.65$
Adjustment to Fund Balance -$
Receipts -$
Interest 69.61$
Expenditures
Ending Balance 6/30/22:17,468.26$
Revenues Expenditures Adjustments Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2017-18 865,041.89$
FY 2017-18 7,175.94 40,713.84 - 831,503.99
FY 2018-19 5,236.01 812,882.16 - 23,857.84
FY 2019-20 367.56 - - 24,225.40
FY 2020-21 124.25 6,951.00 - 17,398.65
FY 2021-22 69.61 17,468.26
Totals 12,973.37$ 860,547.00$ -$ 17,468.26$
Result: Five year test not met in accordance with Government Code section 66001.
Five Year Test
Per Acre Development Fee Public Improvement Expenditures % of Project
Project #Project Name Expenditures Funded by Fee
FY 2021-22
Total FY21-22 Expenditures
FY 2022-23 CIP2102 Water Tank #9 17,468.26 1.09%
Total FY22-23 Budget 17,468.26
PER ACRE DEVELOPMENT FEE (Fund No. 4200)
3
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
Since the five year test has not been met for this fee, additional findings for this fees are provided
per GC Section 66001. The following information is presented with respect to the purpose and
anticipated future use of funds:
(1) Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
The fee provides for the expansion of the City’s water system, including but not
limited to production, storage, and distribution facilities and necessary engineering
and planning studies. The City intends to spend the remaining fee funds on its Water
Tank 9, a water storage facility that benefits new development in the City.
(2) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is
charged:
New development places demands on existing infrastructure, including the City’s
water service, and will inevitably require that the water service utility be expanded to
provide capacity to support the new development. The purpose of this fee, when
originally adopted, was to offset costs of expansions of the City’s water system, as
required to serve such new development. Therefore, the fee has a reasonable
relationship to purpose for which it was charged.
(3) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in
incomplete improvements
The Water Storage Tank 9 Pad and Retaining Wall Project has a total approved
capital improvement program budget of $1,717,486.26. Funding is anticipated to
come from the Per Acre Development Fee ($17,486.26) and the Water Capacity
Charge Fund ($1,700,000.00).
(4) Designate the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in paragraph (3) is
expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund
The City began funding the Water Tank 9 Pad and Retaining Wall Improvements
Project in Fiscal Year 20-21, the funding has been secured, and work is anticipated to
be complete in Fiscal Year 22-23.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING LINKAGE FEE (Fund No. 4225)
4
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
This fee was established per Resolution 2006-277. The fee serves as a mechanism for non-
residential development to offset the impacts created by new workers on the City’s affordable
housing stock. Fee revenue is used to assist in the construction of affordable housing or in the
implementation of housing programs that are outlined in the City’s adopted Housing Element. In
Fiscal Year 21-22, revenue from this fund was used for the Essential Homes for the Workforce
pilot project. In Fiscal Year 22-23, revenue from this fund will be used to support the construction
of the City’s 60-unit interim affordable housing project, Labath Landing.
No interfund transfers or loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations
were made pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: $0.69 per commercial square foot
$1.19 per retail square foot
$0.71 per industrial square foot
The table below illustrates the expenditures from the Affordable Housing Linkage fee in Fiscal
Year 2021-22 and the planned expenditures for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
Beginning Balance 7/1/21:166,417.13$
Adjustment to Fund Balance -$
Receipts 41,548.35$
Interest 660.45$
Expenditures 28,000.00$
Ending Balance 6/30/22:180,625.93$
Revenues Expenditures Adjustments Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2017-18 132,193.95$
FY 2017-18 60,600.68 - - 192,794.63
FY 2018-19 50,131.64 30,000.00 - 212,926.27
FY 2019-20 66,578.59 - - 279,504.86
FY 2020-21 990.47 114,078.20 - 166,417.13
FY 2021-22 42,208.80 28,000.00 180,625.93
Totals 220,510.18$ 172,078.20$ -$ 180,625.93$
Result: Five year test met in accordance with Government Code section 66001.
Five Year Test
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Improvement Expenditures % of Project
Project #Project Name Expenditures Funded by Fee
FY 2021-22 N/A Affordable Assistance 28,000.00 100.00%
Total FY 21-22 Expenditures 28,000.00
FY 2022-23 CIP2107 Homekey/Labath Landing 285,000.00 100.00%
Total FY 22-23 Budget 285,000.00
AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESIDENTIAL FEE (Fund No. 4230)
5
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
This fee was established by Resolution 2019-086 and requires developers of new residential
projects to pay a fee instead of building on-site inclusionary units in order to address the gap
between market prices of housing in the City and prices affordable to very low, low and moderate
income households. In Fiscal Year 21-22, revenue from this fund was used to support the
construction of the City’s 60-unit interim affordable housing project, Labath Landing. The revenue
for Fiscal Year 22-23 will continue to be used to support the Labath Landing project
No interfund loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations were made
pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: See Attachment 1
The table below illustrates the expenditures from the Affordable Housing Residential fee in
Fiscal Year 2021-22 and the planned expenditures for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
* The FY 2017-18 revenues in this Fund are for exaction fees pursuant to a Development Agreement between the City and Stadium
Development Partners LLC for a 12.32 acre parcel at Labath and Carlson Avenue.
Beginning Balance 7/1/21:353,256.13$
Adjustment to Fund Balance -$
Receipts 252,518.00$
Interest 2,129.27$
Expenditures 121,728.54$
Ending Balance 6/30/22:486,174.86$
Revenues Expenditures Adjustments Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2017-18 -$
FY 2017-18 50,054.22 - - 50,054.22
FY 2018-19 743.55 - - 50,797.77
FY 2019-20 781.72 1,626.00 - 49,953.49
FY 2020-21 303,302.64 - - 353,256.13
FY 2021-22 254,647.27 121,728.54 486,174.86
Totals 609,529.40$ 123,354.54$ -$ 486,174.86$
Result: Five year test met in accordance with Government Code section 66001.
Five Year Test
Affordable Housing Residential Fee Improvement Expenditures % of Project
Project #Project Name Expenditures Funded by Fee
FY 2021-22 CIP2107 Homekey/Labath Landing 121,728.54 100.00%
Total FY 21-22 Expenditures 121,728.54
FY 2022-23 CIP2107 Homekey/Labath Landing 463,521.46 100.00%
Total FY 22-23 Budget 463,521.46
TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION FEE (Fund No. 4215)
6
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
This fee was established per Resolution 79-185 for the construction of traffic signals at planned
intersections. This fee was repealed on July 13, 2004, when the City’s Public Facilities Fee was
established (see discussion under Fund Nos. 4254 and 4250 later in this report). In Fiscal Year
2021-22, the City used these fee revenues for design and engineering of a traffic flow improvement
project at the intersection of Southwest Boulevard and Commerce Boulevard. In Fiscal Year 2022-
23, the City will use the remaining revenue from this fund for the aforementioned project and then
close the fund.
No loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations were made pursuant to
subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: NA-No longer collected. Fee has been superceded by the Public Facilities
Fee.
The table below illustrates the expenditures from the Traffic Signalization Fee Fund in Fiscal
Year 2021-22 and the planned expenditures for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
Beginning Balance 7/1/21:396,712.34$
Adjustment to Fund Balance -$
Receipts
Interest 1,083.05$
Expenditures 385,799.44$
Ending Balance 6/30/22:11,995.95$
Revenues Expenditures Adjustments Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2017-18 1,071,299.73$
FY 2017-18 8,260.45 251,061.45 - 828,498.73
FY 2018-19 12,146.71 10,856.58 - 829,788.86
FY 2019-20 12,461.31 43,770.53 - 798,479.64
FY 2020-21 4,451.42 406,218.72 - 396,712.34
FY 2021-22 1,083.05 385,799.44 11,995.95
Totals 38,402.94$ 1,097,706.72$ -$ 11,995.95$
Result: Five year test met in accordance with Government Code section 66001.
Five Year Test
Traffic Signalization Fee Improvement Expenditures % of Project
Project #Project Name Expenditures Funded by Fee
FY 2021-22 2017-07 TR-84 Intersection Imp 385,799.44 31.92%
Total FY 21-22 Expenditures 385,799.44
FY 2022-23 2017-07 TR-84 Intersection Imp 11,995.95 31.92%
Total FY 22-23 Budget 11,995.95
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE (Fund No. 4254 & 4250)
7
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
This fee was established in 2004 and updated in 2008 and 2011. The most recent update was
approved by Resolution 2011-109. Fee revenue is to be used for; (a) the purposes described in the
City’s Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP); (b) for reimbursing the City for the development’s
fair share of those capital improvements, included in the PFFP and already constructed by the City;
or (c) for reimbursing developers who have constructed public facilities described in the PFFP.
The City annually uses fee revenue from this fund to make a portion of regular debt service
payments incurred by the City and the Santa Rosa Subregional System for expansions that serve
new development. In Fiscal Year 2021-22, the City used the fee revenues to fund the construction
of the Westside Public Safety Fire Station to meet new development service demands west of
Highway 101, the construction of intersection improvements on the east side of the City and
initiating design of Dowdell Avenue extension
In Fiscal Year 2022-23, the City will use these fee revenues for preliminary design of recycled
water expansion, continued work on the Copeland Creek Detention Basin and intersection
improvements to address traffic flow generated by new development.
No interfund loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations were made
pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: See Attachment 1
The tables below illustrate the expenditures from the Public Facilities Fee in Fiscal Year 2021-22
and the planned expenditures for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
Combined
Beginning Balance 7/1/21:8,741,602.93$
Adjustment to Fund Balance -$
Receipts 8,498,583.70$
Interest 43,963.35$
Expenditures 2,143,788.60$
Ending Balance 6/30/22:15,140,361.38$
Revenues Expenditures Adjustments Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2017-18 (11,740,236.24)$
FY 2017-18 10,349,058.99 2,854,501.43 - (4,245,678.68)
FY 2018-19 11,547,564.57 1,590,951.57 - 5,710,934.32
FY 2019-20 5,423,951.46 3,710,712.40 - 7,424,173.38
FY 2020-21 4,661,933.24 3,344,503.69 - 8,741,602.93
FY 2021-22 8,542,547.05 2,143,788.60 15,140,361.38
Totals 31,982,508.26$ 13,644,457.69$ -$ 15,140,361.38$
Result: Five year test met in accordance with Government Code section 66001.
Five Year Test
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE (Fund No. 4254 & 4250)
8
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
Public Facilities Fee Improvement Expenditures % of Project
Project #Project Name Expenditures Funded by Fee
FY 2021-22 N/A Reimb GF Dev Srvs Admin Costs 119,473.00 N/A
FY 2021-22 N/A Reimb GF Finance Admin Costs 139,934.00 N/A
FY 2021-22 N/A Subregional Waste Water Expansion 722,341.56 N/A
FY 2021-22 N/A 24.965% Debt Svcs Refunding Sewer 174,368.04 N/A
FY 2021-22 N/A Public Finance Fee Bank Charges 0.00 N/A
FY 2021-22 2004-13 Westside Public Safety Bldg 121,715.76 27.12%
FY 2021-22 2006-04 OF-39 Copeland Creek Detention 8,285.34 32.37%
FY 2021-22 2017-06 Snyder Lane Widening 0.00 100.00%
FY 2021-22 2017-07 Intersect Imprv - Comm Blvd SW Blvd 521,000.00 20.02%
FY 2021-22 2017-18 TR-35 Keiser Ave Reconstruction 249,261.09 96.01%
FY 2021-22 2018-28 Interceptor Outfall- P2 15,796.43 21.11%
FY 2021-22 2020-20 Dowdell Ave Extension 63,585.51 100.00%
FY 2021-22 2020-24 Habitat Mitigation & Monitoring Plan 7,907.45 100.00%
FY 2021-22 2022-01 Snyder Ln/Keiser Ave Intersection Impv 120.42 100.00%
Total FY 2020-21 Expenditures 2,143,788.60
FY 2022-23 N/A Reimb GF Dev Srvs Admin Costs 123,655.00 N/A
FY 2022-23 N/A Reimb GF Finance Admin Costs 144,832.00 N/A
FY 2022-23 N/A Subregional Waste Water Expansion 750,000.00 N/A
FY 2022-23 N/A 24.965% Debt Svcs Refunding Sewer 174,743.00 N/A
FY 2022-23 2004-13 Westside Public Safety Bldg 250,120.09 27.12%
FY 2022-23 2005-03 RW-01 Recycled Water Expansion 11,663.73 100.00%
FY 2022-23 2006-04 OF-39 Copeland Creek Detention 2,500,854.25 32.37%
FY 2022-23 2017-06 Snyder Lane Widening 97,000.47 100.00%
FY 2022-23 2017-18 TR-35 Keiser Ave Reconstruction 1,041,481.60 96.01%
FY 2022-23 2018-28 Interceptor Outfall- P2 192,655.36 21.11%
FY 2022-23 2020-20 Dowdell Ave Extension 705,975.97 100.00%
FY 2022-23 2020-24 Habitat Mitigation 32,092.55 100.00%
FY 2022-23 2022-01 Snyder Ln/Keiser Ave Intersection Impv 2,399,879.58 100.00%
Total FY 2022-23 Budget 8,424,953.60
COPELAND CREEK DRAINAGE FEE (Fund No. 4280)
9
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
This fee was established per Resolution 67-64 for improvements to the Copeland Creek watershed
to offset the impacts of new development. The fee has been superceded by the PF Fee Fund which
also includes improvements to offset the impacts of development in Copeland Creek. In Fiscal
Year 2022-23 the remaining fee revenue will be used to support the Copeland Creek Flood
Prevention project and then the fund will be closed.
No interfund transfers or loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations
were made pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: No longer collected. Fee has been superceded by the Public Facilities Fee.
The City had no expenditures in FY 2021-22 and the balance remaining is being designated to
the Copeland Creek Flood Prevention project in FY 2022-23.
Beginning Balance 7/1/21:2,273.89$
Adjustment to Fund Balance -$
Receipts -$
Interest 9.10$
Expenditures -$
Ending Balance 6/30/22:2,282.99$
Revenues Expenditures Adjustments Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2017-18 54,489.28$
FY 2017-18 1,157.35 30,000.00 - 25,646.63
FY 2018-19 861.28 25,702.00 - 805.91
FY 2019-20 1,453.73 - - 2,259.64
FY 2020-21 14.25 - - 2,273.89
FY 2021-22 9.10 - 2,282.99
Totals 3,495.71$ 55,702.00$ -$ 2,282.99$
Result: Five year test met in accordance with Government Code section 66001.
Five Year Test
Copeland Creek Drainage Fee Improvement Expenditures % of Project
Project #Project Name Expenditures Funded by Fee
FY 2021-22 2006-04 OF-39 Copeland Creek Flood 0.00 22.73%
Total FY 2021-22 Expenditures 0.00
FY 2022-23 2006-04 OF-39 Copeland Creek Flood 2282.99 22.73%
Total FY 2022-23 Budget 2282.99
WILFRED DOWDELL PUBLIC SAFETY MITIGATION FEE (Fund No. 4286)
10
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
This fee was established per Resolution 2014-129 and is intended to mitigate impacts to the City’s
public safety department as a result of development in the Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan Area.
Specifically the fee provides for the purchase of equipment needed to outfit the additional Public
Safety Officers required as a result of project development.
In Fiscal Year 2021-22 there were no fee revenues or expenditures.
No interfund loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations were made
pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: $1,895.02 per acre
Beginning Balance 7/1/21:-$
Adjustment to Fund Balance -$
Receipts -$
Interest -$
Expenditures -$
Ending Balance 6/30/22:-$
Revenues Expenditures Adjustments Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2017-18 13,178.81$
FY 2017-18 110.80 - - 13,289.61
FY 2018-19 180.17 - - 13,469.78
FY 2019-20 2.03 13,338.00 - 133.81
FY 2020-21 0.30 134.11 - (0.00)
FY 2021-22 - - - (0.00)
Totals 293.30$ 13,472.11$ -$ (0.00)$
Result: Five year test met in accordance with Government Code section 66001.
Five Year Test
WATER CAPACITY CHARGE FUND (Fund No. 3436)
11
OAK #4871-5964-3967 v1
This fee was established per Resolution 2016-112 and replaces the City’s “Per Acre Development
Fee” (Fund 4200), which was simultaneously repealed. The fee provides for expansion of the
City’s water system including production, storage and limited distribution facilities, along with the
planning and engineering studies necessary to complete these capital facilities.
In Fiscal Year 2021-22, the City used these fee revenues on water system upgrades and expansion
projects, including the construction of Water Tank #9, as well as the water system master plan,
which will help determine future projects.
No interfund transfers or loans were made from this fund. In addition, no refunds or allocations
were made pursuant to subdivision (e) and (f) of Government Code Section 66001.
Amount of Fee: See Attachment 1
The tables below illustrate the expenditures from the Water Capacity Charge Fee Fund in Fiscal
Year 2021-22 and the planned expenditures for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
Beginning Balance 7/1/21:843,648.07$
Adjustment to Fund Balance -$
Receipts 973,006.11$
Interest 5,239.25$
Expenditures 113,275.11$
Ending Balance 6/30/22:1,708,618.32$
Revenues Expenditures Adjustments Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance 2017-18 4,964,803.72$
FY 2017-18 2,644,676.09 842,227.39 - 6,767,252.42
FY 2018-19 748,482.42 3,577,160.04 - 3,938,574.80
FY 2019-20 704,798.64 3,742,756.56 - 900,616.88
FY 2020-21 731,433.75 788,402.56 - 843,648.07
FY 2021-22 978,245.36 113,275.11 1,708,618.32
Totals 5,807,636.26$ 9,063,821.66$ -$ 1,708,618.32$
Result: Five year test met in accordance with Government Code section 66001.
Five Year Test
Water Capacity Fee Improvement Expenditures % of Project
Project #Project Name Expenditures Funded by Fee
FY2021-22 2018-08 Water System Master Plan 160.14 100.00%
FY2021-22 2021-02 Water Tank #9 113,114.97 100.00%
Total FY 2020-21 Expenditures 113,275.11
FY 2022-23 2021-02 Water Tank #9 100,000.00 100.00%
Total FY 2022-23 Budget 100,000.00
Development Impact Fees
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
The Public Facilities Fee (PFF) is based on the Public Facilities Finance Plan, which determined the facilities needed to
serve new development built out in accordance with the City’s General Plan, and in turn, new developments’ fair share of
the costs of those facilities. The fair share of costs varies based on the land use class of the new development and the
location of the new development.
New residential development is subject to the Public Facilities Fee shown in Table 1: Residential Fees below. Fair
share costs for expansion of sewer, water, and public facilities are included in the fees shown below.
Table 1: Residential Fees
Land Use
Designation
Infill
East of
Hwy 101
Infill
West of
Hwy 101
Northeast
SPA
University
District
SPA
Southeast
SPA
SOMO
Village
PD
Northwest
SPA
Wilfred
Dowdell
SPA
Stadium
Lands
PD
Canon
Manor
SPA
Single
Family
Residential
(unit)
$23,726 $25,677 $36,807 $37,331 $33,792 $28,979 NA NA NA $26,582
Multi-
Family
Residential
(unit)
$15,313 $16,533 $22,898 $23,022 $21,868 $18,726 $16,999 NA $17,119 $17,357
Senior
Housing
(unit)
$14,503 $15,723 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Assisted
Living
(unit)
$12,612 $13,222 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
New non-residential development is subject to 3 components that together make up the total Public Facilities Fee for
such projects:
Table 2: PFF – Public Facilities. This component of the PFF pays for expanded transportation infrastructure
(i.e. new roads, traffic signals), public safety capacity and infrastructure (e.g. Westside Public Safety building),
and public works and community facilities. The fee is based on a rate determined by the land use and project
location, multiplied by each enclosed 1000 SF of project.
Table 3: PFF – Sewer. This component pays for the infrastructure needed to send additional sewerage to the
Laguna Treatment Plant. The fee is based on a rate determined by the land use and project location, multiplied
by the daily flow gallons expected to be generated by the new development, based on the number and type of
fixtures in the project.
Table 4: PFF – Drainage. This component pays for additional capacity of the drainage system needed to lessen
and treat runoff created by new impervious surfaces in new development. The fee is based on a rate determined
by the land use and project location, multiplied by 1000 SF of disturbed site area created by the project.
City of Rohnert Park
Development Impact Fees (continued)
Rev. 6/22/21 Page 2
Table 2: PFF - Public Facilities for Non-Residential Development
Fees Applied to Enclosed Thousand Square Feet (TSF)
Table 3: PFF – Sewer, for Non-Residential Development
Fees Applied to Gallons of Wastewater Generated (GAL)
Table 4: PFF – Drainage for Non-Residential Development
Fees Applied to Disturbed Site Area (TSF)
Land Use
Designation
Infill East
of Hwy
101
Infill West
of Hwy 101
Northeast
SPA
University
District
SPA
Southeast
SPA
SOMO
Village
PD
Northwest
SPA
Wilfred
Dowdell
SPA
Stadium
Lands PD
Canon
Manor
SPA
General
Office
(enclosed tsf)
$10,913 $12,658 NA $11,459 $11,459 $11,459 $12,658 $12,658 12,658 NA
Hotel/Motel
(enclosed tsf) $7,812 $8,706 NA $8,013 $8,013 $8,013 $8,453 $8,453 $8,453 NA
Retail
(enclosed tsf) $16,392 $17,501 NA $16,739 $16,739 $16,739 $17,501 $17,501 $17,501 NA
Light
Industrial
(enclosed tsf)
$3,514 $3,917 NA $3,639 $3,639 $3,639 $3,917 $3,917 $3,917 NA
Heavy
Industrial
(enclosed tsf)
$3,514 $3,917 NA $3,639 $3,639 $3,639 $3,917 $3,917 $3,917 NA
Warehouse
(tsf) $2,826 $3,230 NA $2,953 $2,953 $2,953 $3,230 $3,230 $3,230 NA
Land Use
Designation
Infill East of
Hwy
101
Infill West
of Hwy
101
Northeast
SPA
University
District
SPA
Southeast
SPA
SOMO
Village
PD
Northwest
SPA
Wilfred
Dowdell
SPA
Stadium
Lands
PD
Canon
Manor
SPA
General
Office $84.91 $84.91 NA $144.58 $140.53 $140.53 $84.91 $84.91 $84.91 $140.53
Hotel/Motel $84.91 $84.91 NA $144.58 $140.53 $140.53 $84.91 $84.91 $84.91 $140.53
Retail $84.91 $84.91 NA $144.58 $140.53 $140.53 $84.91 $84.91 $84.91 $140.53
Light
Industrial $84.91 $84.91 NA $144.58 $140.53 $140.53 $84.91 $84.91 $84.91 $140.53
Heavy
Industrial $84.91 $84.91 NA $144.58 $140.53 $140.53 $84.91 $84.91 $84.91 $140.53
Warehouse $84.91 $84.91 NA $144.58 $140.53 $140.53 $84.91 $84.91 $84.91 $140.53
Land Use
Designation
Infill East
of Hwy
101
Infill West
of Hwy
101
Northeast
SPA
University
District
SPA
Southeast
SPA
SOMO
Village PD
Northwest
SPA
Wilfred
Dowdell
SPA
Stadium
Lands PD
Canon
Manor
SPA
General
Office
(disturbed tsf)
NA NA NA $359.60 NA NA $327.27 $327.27 $327.27 NA
Hotel/Motel
(disturbed tsf) NA NA NA $359.60 NA NA $327.27 $327.27 $327.27 NA
Retail
(disturbed tsf) NA NA NA $359.60 NA NA $327.27 $327.27 $327.27 NA
Light
Industrial
(disturbed tsf)
NA NA NA $359.60 NA NA $327.27 $327.27 $327.27 NA
Heavy
Industrial
(disturbed tsf)
NA NA NA $359.60 NA NA $327.27 $327.27 $327.27 NA
Warehouse
(disturbed tsf) NA NA NA $359.60 NA NA $327.27 $327.27 $327.27 NA
City of Rohnert Park
Development Impact Fees (continued)
Rev. 6/22/21 Page 3
Public Facilities Fee Schedule Notes
1. See 2011 Update to the Public Facilities Finance Plan for detailed presentation of calculations. (Adopted by City
Council Resolution)
2. “Infill Development” is all development (new, remodel or reconstruction) outside of the defined Specific Plan
Areas or Planned Developments
3. Non-residential fees are calculated by summing the values from Tables 2, 3, and 4 for the type of land use
proposed.
4. “Mixed Use” fees are calculated by summing the fees calculated for each type of land use within the mixed use
proposal.
5. N/A or Not Applicable means that a particular fee component does not apply within the defined geographic area
because:
a. New development within that geographic does not create impacts to certain infrastructure systems; or
b. Approved Specific Plans do not include certain land use classes, hence fee components have not been
computed.
6. Enclosed Thousand Square Feet is calculated based on the gross floor area, as defined in Chapter 17.04 of the
Municipal Code including any patio area under a horizontal projection of the roof, the floor above or other
covering, when such area is used for activities integral to the commercial business.
7. Disturbed Thousand Square Feet is calculated based on the total area approved for grading on the property.
8. The Public Facilities Finance Fee is subject to adjustment by the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost
Index (ENR-CCI) for the San Francisco Bay Area on July 1st each year.
WATER CAPACITY CHARGES
The Water Capacity Charge (WCC), adopted in November 2016, funds water supply infrastructure needed by new
development. This fee replaced the “Per Acre Development Fee” and “Special Water Connection Fee” and is charged to
new residential and non-residential development. A Water Capacity Charge Analysis was conducted to determine the
improvements to be financed by the WCC, including buy-in to the City’s existing well field, a fair share allocation of the
Sonoma County Water Agency’s planned supply improvements, and new storage tanks required by the environmental
documents for the new development areas. Like the Public Facilities Fee, the fair share of costs varies based on the land
use class of the new development and the location of the new development. The Water Capacity Charge is subject to
ENR-CCI adjustment on July 1st each year.
Table 1: Water Capacity Charges – Residential
Land Use
Designation
Infill
East of
Hwy 101
Infill
West of
Hwy 101
Northeast
Specific
Plan
University
District
Specific
Plan
Southeast
Specific
Plan
Wilfred
Dowdell
Specific
Plan
Northwest
Specific
Plan
Stadium
Lands
Planned
Development
SOMO
Village
Planned
Development
Single
Family
Residential
(per unit)
$1,691.72 $1,691.72 $4,243.29 $6,179.28 $7,014.52 $1,691.72 $1,691.72 $1,691.72 $7,781.98
Multi-
Family
Residential
(per unit)
$859.29 $859.29 $2,155.31 $3,138.67 $3,562.92 $859.29 $5,453.37 $859.29 $3,952.72
Senior
Housing
(per unit)
$859.29 $859.29 $2,155.31 $3,138.67 $3,562.92 $859.29 $5,453.37 $859.29 $3,952.72
Assisted
Living
(per unit)
$859.29 $859.29 $2,155.31 $3,138.67 $3,562.92 $859.29 $5,453.37 $859.29 $3,952.72
City of Rohnert Park
Development Impact Fees (continued)
Rev. 6/22/21 Page 4
Table 2: Water Capacity Charges – Non-Residential
Land Use
Designation
Infill
East of
Hwy 101
Infill
West of
Hwy 101
Northeast
Specific
Plan
University
District
Specific
Plan
Southeast
Specific
Plan
Wilfred
Dowdell
Specific
Plan
Northwest
Specific
Plan
Stadium
Lands
Planned
Development
SOMO
Village
Planned
Development
Non
Residential
(per gpd) $7.28 $7.28 $18.26 $26.59 $30.18 $7.28 $43.42 $7.28 $33.49
AFFORDABLE HOUSING LINKAGE FEE
The linkage fee requirement applies to nonresidential development projects involving the construction of a new building,
construction of additional gross square footage to an existing building, and interior remodels that increase the
employment density, and changes in use that do not require interior remodels but increase the employee density of the
nonresidential development as determined by the Director of Community Development.
Non-residential land uses are divided into three classifications: commercial, retail, and industrial. The Director of
Community Development determines the land use classifications that best describe the nonresidential development. The
fees for those classifications are determined as follows:
Effective Date Commercial Fee Retail Fee Industrial Fee
July 1, 2008 $0.69/square foot $1.19/square foot $0.71/square foot
RENTAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEE
For residential rental housing projects, the Rental Affordable Housing Fee of $3.51 / square foot shall be paid prior to,
or at the time of, building permit issuance. The fee revenues shall be used in accordance with the Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance. (Note: This fee is subject to adjustment by the ENR-CCI San Francisco on July 1 each year.)
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN-LIEU FEE
For construction of new for-sale residential projects of fifty (50) or units or more, in-lieu of providing affordable housing
on site, $13,593.73 /unit shall be paid prior to, or at the time of, building permit issuance. The fee revenues shall be used
in accordance with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. (Note: This fee is subject to adjustment by the ENR-CCI San
Francisco on July 1 each year.)
GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE
The general plan maintenance fee is used to cover the costs of providing updates to the City’s General Plan and is
calculated as 0.5% of the total construction valuation of building permits for new construction and commercial and
industrial additions.
COPELAND CREEK DRAINAGE FEE
If the development occurs in the Copeland Creek Drainage District, the fee applies. The Copeland Creek Drainage Fee is
calculated at the rate of $630 per acre.
UNIVERSITY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT FEES
UDSP REGIONAL TRAFFIC FEE
For residential development within the University District Specific Plan, the UDSP Regional Traffic Fee in the amount
$3,500 per unit is due at the time of building permit issuance of a single family residence or other dwelling unit for each
market rate residential unit to mitigate the regional traffic impacts of the project.
City of Rohnert Park
Development Impact Fees (continued)
Rev. 6/22/21 Page 5
UDSP MAINTENANCE ANNUITY FEE
For residential development within the University District Specific Plan, the UDSP Maintenance Annuity Fee in the
amount of $13,779.36 per unit is due at the time of issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each Residential unit,
including all market rate and all affordable units, including single family and multi-family for-sale and rental units.
(Note: This fee is subject to CPI adjustment on May 22 each year.)
SOUTHEAST SPECIFIC PLAN (SESP) DEVELOPMENT FEES
SESP ONE-TIME MAINTENANCE FEE
For residential development within the Southeast Specific Plan, the SESP One-Time Maintenance Fee is due at the time
of building permit issuance for each market-rate residential unit, to partially offset the projected fiscal deficit to the
City’s general fund created by each Unit, in an amount shown in the table below. (Note: This fee is subject to CPI
adjustment on June 1st each year.)
Residential Unit Type Fee
Single-Family Detached, Conventional Lot $2,762.00 per unit
Single-Family Detached, Small Lot Market Rate $2,457.50 per unit
Single-Family Detached, Estate Lot $4,157.92 per unit
Single-Family Attached, Market Rate $1,639.52 per unit
Single-Family Attached (duplex/duet), Below Market Rate $1,415.03 per unit
SESP ADDITIONAL SERVICE PERSONNEL FEE
For residential development within the Southeast Specific Plan, the SESP Additional Service Personnel Fee in the
amount of $689.30 per residential unit is due at the time of building permit issuance for that unit, to offset the cost of
additional public safety personnel, such as police officers and fire-fighters to serve the Southeast Specific Plan. (Note:
Fee is subject to CPI adjustment on January 13 each year.)
SESP REGIONAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
For residential development within the Southeast Specific Plan, the SESP Regional Traffic Fee in the amount of
$4,054.64 per market-rate residential unit is due at the time of sale of the single-family residence or other dwelling
unit and out of the escrow account for the sale of that unit to mitigate the regional traffic impacts of the Southeast
Specific Plan. (Note: Fee is subject to CPI adjustment on January 13 each year.)
SESP VALLEY HOUSE DRIVE MITIGATION FEE
For residential development within the Southeast Specific Plan, the SESP Valley House Drive Mitigation Fee in the
amount of $1,000 per market-rate residential unit is due at the time of sale of the single-family residence or other
dwelling unit and out of the escrow account for the sale of that unit to mitigate a portion of the impacts from construction
traffic on collector roads.
WILFRED DOWDELL SPECIFIC PLAN (WDSP) DEVELOPMENT FEES
WILFRED DOWDELL SPECIFIC PLAN REIMBURSEMENT FEE
This fee applies to lots within the Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan Area for which Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan
Reimbursement Fee has not been paid. Contact the Building Division to determine if a parcel in question qualifies for
this fee. The fee is due at parcel map application or building permit issuance, whichever occurs first. The fee is
determined at the rate of $18,886.66 per acre. (Note: This fee is subject to adjustment as needed for the City to recover
costs to administer the Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan.)
City of Rohnert Park
Development Impact Fees (continued)
Rev. 6/22/21 Page 6
WDSP PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT MITIGATION FEE
This fee applies to lots within the Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan Area for which Wilfred Dowdell Specific Plan Public
Safety Equipment Mitigation Fee has not been paid. Contact the Building Division to determine if a parcel in question is
subject to this fee. The fee is determined at the rate of $2,117.29 per acre and is due at building permit issuance (Note:
This fee is subject to ENR-CCI adjustment on July 1 each year.)
SOMO VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT FEES
SOMO VILLAGE REGIONAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
For development within SOMO Village, the Regional Traffic Fee in the amount of $3,565 per unit is due at the time of
building permit issuance for each residential and/or commercial unit or building within the Project to mitigate the
regional traffic impacts of SOMO Village. (Note: This fee is subject to CPI adjustment on April 23 each year.)
SOMO VILLAGE CLIMATE ACTION PLAN FEE
For residential development within SOMO Village, the Climate Action Plan Fee in the amount of $271.26 per
residential unit is due at the time of building permit issuance for that unit, for the purpose of mitigating SMV/ SOMO’s
impacts on City's greenhouse gas production. (Note: This fee is subject to CPI adjustment on April 23 each year.)
SOMO VILLAGE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PERSONNEL FEE
For residential development within SOMO Village, the Additional Service Personnel Fee in the amount of $684.00 per
residential unit is due at the time of building permit issuance for that unit for the purpose of mitigating City's costs for
additional service personnel to serve SOMO Village. (Note: This fee is subject to CPI adjustment on April 23 each year.)
SOMO VILLAGE PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE / STREET REPAVING FEE
For residential development within SOMO Village, an initial payment of the Pavement Maintenance / Street Repaving
Fee in the amount of $218.56 per residential unit is due at the time of building permit issuance for that unit, for the
purpose of mitigating street maintenance and street pavement impacts of SOMO Village. Subsequent annual payments of
this fee are due not later than April 30 each year following the year of initial payment and continuing in perpetuity.
(Note: This fee is subject to CPI adjustment on April 23 each year.)
SOMO VILLAGE PUBLIC SERVICE PAYMENT
For residential development within SOMO Village, the Public Services Impact Fee in the amount of $1,135.66 per
residential unit is due at the time of building permit issuance for that unit, for the purpose of mitigating the additional
service costs of the City to serve SOMO Village. Subsequent annual payments of this fee are due not later than April 30
each year following the year of initial payment and continuing in perpetuity. (Note: This fee is subject to CPI adjustment
on April 23 each year.)