1992/09/22 City Council Minutes Joint Meeting with Community Development AgencyROHNERT PARK CITY COLMIL MINUTES
for the
JOINT ADJOURNED MEETING
CITY COUNCIL /CCR4 -NITY DEVELOPM Wr AGENCY
- BUDGET WORK SESSION -
September 22, 1992
The Council of the City of Rohnert Park and the Agency Nlambers
of the Community Development Agency of the City of Rohnert
Park met this date in a joint adjourned session commencing at
5:00 p.m. in the City Offices, 6750 Commerce Blvd., Rohnert
Park, California with Mayor /Chairperson Spiro presiding.
Call to Order Mayor /Chairperson Spiro called the adjourned joint meeting
session to order at approximately 5:00 p.m.
Roll Call Present: (5) Councilmembers /Agency Members Eck (arrived at
5:20 p.m.), Hollingsworth, Hopkins, Reilly and
Mayor /Chairperson Spiro
Absent: (0) None
Staff present for all or part of the meeting: City Manager
Netter, Assistant to the City Manager Leivo, Finance Director
Harrow and Director of Public Works /City Engineer Brust.
Mayor /Chairperson Spiro stated in compliance with State Law
(The Brown Act), anyone in the audience who wished to make a
comment may do so at this time. In most cases under
legislation of the Brown Act, the Council cannot handle an
item without agendizing. To ensure accurate recording,
"Speaker Cards" are provided at the entrance of the Chamber
and unscheduled public appearances are requested to fill out
the cards and present to recording secretary after speaking.
No one responded.
Items for discussion:
1. Review of City's General Fund and Utility Fund Operations
for Fiscal Year 1991 -92
City Manager Netter and Finance Director Harrow reviewed the
handout sheets and the staff report dated September 3rd, 1992
(of which copies are attached to original set of these
minutes) highlighting the results of Fiscal Year 1991 -92. In
su mmary, the General Fund Revenues were 112.54% of
budget, or $1.5 million more than anticipated. The General
Fund expenditures were 101.13% of budget, or $170,920 more
than anticipated. Staff reviewed each line item that
accounted for these budget to actual variations. City Manager
Netter discussed the reserves as of June 30, 1992 and
indicated that the General Fund Reserve is estimated to have
an ending balance of approximately $1.6 million, which still
meets the 10% criteria established by the City Council.
Rohnert Park City Council /CDA Joint Adj. Minutes (2) September 22, 1992
- BUDGET WORK SESSION -
City Manager Netter went on to discuss the Sports Center
operation and indicated that the operation has exceeded
expenses quite well over the past year as revenues are up
and expenses are down. For the entire operation for fiscal
year 1991 -92, including all administrative costs, the
operation exceeded expenses by $4,102 as compared to a $44,000
the previous year. W. Netter briefly outlined the Performing
Arts Center's twelve (12) month operation and indicated that
the Council had previously approved a down - sizing as the total
loss for the fiscal year was approximately $397,000. The
down- sizing for the upcoming fiscal year should curtail the
amount of loss. City Manager Netter and Finance Director
Mike Harrow briefly summarized the Utility Operations and
responded to various Council questions.
2. 1992 -93 Revised City Budget (including State impacts)
City Manager Netter and Finance Director Harrow discussed the
handout representing the 1992 -93 adjusted budget. This
document listed the General Fund unadjusted budget with the
proposed budget as submitted to Council with the 3rd column
showing the current and impacts after the State "hit ". In
summary, after the State "hit ", the General Fund operations
will be in a deficit position in the amount of $343,895. This
was represented by, and included, the State "hit" for approxi-
mately $200,000 from property taxes, an additional $25,000 of
the State cigarette taxes eliminated from city coffers, and
approximately $325,000 impact from reduction in Community
Development Agency property tax increments (payments back
to City).
Staff and the City Council discussed various options as
outlined on page 2 of the green sheet, of which a copy is
attached to the original set of these minutes. Staff outlined
various options but recommYmended that the $343,895 deficit be
balanced by (1) use of the 1992 -93 PERS surplus in the amount
of $323,319 (this amount would have been normally deposited
into the retired employees medical reserve), and the balance
of $20,576 to be taken from the reserve for self- insured
losses.
Councilman Eck indicated he would like to see an overall
reduction in travel and meetings for staff and officials, and
indicated that the medical benefits for management, officials
and other employees should be reviewed very carefully and
changes should be considered during the upcoming negotiations
with the employee groups. City Manager Netter indicated that
he has already had some previous thoughts on the matter and
there may be a possibility of establishing a "two- tier" system
for new employees hired after a certain date. These matters
will be discussed further during the upcoming negotiating
sessions beginning prior to the fiscal year 1993 -94. Council
also indicated that the City Manager should not authorize any
Rohnert Park City Council /CDA Joint Adj. Minutes (3) September 22, 1992
- BUDGET WORK SESSION -
capital expenditures that are not absolutely necessary, and
in addition, projects should be pared down wherever possible.
A motion was made by Councilman Hollingsworth, seconded by
Councilman Eck, to approve the City Nbnager's recommendation
in balancing the $343,895 deficit by the use of the PERS
surplus funds in the amount of $323,319 and the balance of
approximately $20,576 from the Reserve for Self- Insured
Losses, and carried unanimously.
3. Community Development Agency Budget 1992 -93
Executive Director Netter and Finance Director Harrow reviewed
the budget which included the State impacts. This item was
outlined in the pink sheet of which a copy is attached to the
original set of these minutes. The sheet showed that in the
General Fund, due to the recent State "hit ", the Comninity
Development Agency would have to pay $538,753 to the State.
Executive Director Netter indicated this "hit" most likely
will continue in future years and Agency Members might just as
well figure the Redevelopment Agencies will be a thing of
the past.
Executive Director Netter outlined the General Fund and the
Low to Nbderate Housing Fund accounts and informed the Agency
that the State "hit" of $538,753 is not allowed to be paid for
by the Low to Nbderate Housing funds. There is a provision in
the law that allows for a 50% loan of the new property tax
increments against the Low to Nbderate Housing funds, but this
amounts to only approximately $137,000. It is staff's
recommendation to pay this half a million dollars plus from
the project accounts. Executive Director Netter then turned
to page 3 of the pink sheets which outlines the projects
either in progress or planned for implementation. These
projects included finalizing the Public Safety Main Building,
$1,000,000; Alicia Park lights, $60,000; the Public Safety
West Animal Shelter, $1,000,000; the Rohnert Park Expressway
Interim Project Overpass, $1,020,000; and the Commerce
Boulevard Bike Path, $161,000.
Executive Director Netter indicated that the Public Safety
Main Building $1 million has already been spent and will be
used against the 10% retention. The Alicia Park lights
project has been completed for an expenditure of $60,000. The
three (3) projects that are on the drawing board that the
Agency my want to consider eliminating or reducing would be
the Public Safety Animal Shelter of $1 million, the Rohnert
Park Expressway Interim Project Overpass of $1,020,000, and
the Commerce Boulevard Bike Path of $161,000. Executive
Director Netter indicated that he was in support of all three
projects but, now that the State has this major "hit" this
year and will probably continue in future years, the two large
projects of the Animal Shelter and road project,
unfortunately, will have to be considered. W. Netter further
indicated his support of both projects but, if a priority
Rohnert Park City Council /CDA Joint Adj. Minutes (4) September 22, 1992
- BUDGET WORK SESSION -
Adjournment
would have to be drawn, in his opinion, the Rohnert Park
Expressway Overpass project is paramount. This project has
been discussed for years and has been referenced in various
completed EIR's. Mr. Netter has been working with Director of
Public Works Brust for over a year now trying to find a
solution that would assist traffic flows, but yet be a program
with minimum expenditure. Original on estimates on work to be
done on that project was as high as $4 million and,
now, a program has been set that would cost approximately
$1.1 million. Mr. Netter indicated very strongly that this
project should not be the project sacrificed due to the
State "hit ". He indicated that the Agency may want to
reconsider the Animal Shelter, not to eliminate it, but to
defer this project until future funding is obtained. In
addition, the Agency may want to consider alternatives such as
moving some portable facilities over to the site in order to
address additional office space, dog runs and other animal
facilities. Agency Member Hollingsworth suggested that some
type of an interim proposal may work which would include some
portables that the City owns that are currently located at the
High School site. Councilman. Reilly inquired about Cal -Trans
funding for the Expressway bridge widening and said he
attended a meeting whereby it was said that Cal -Trans had
surplus funds for projects. Director of Public Works Brust
addressed Cal -Trans and State funding and responded to further
Council questions. Discussion continued.
There was further discussion in regards to the Animal Shelter
and it was the consensus of the Agency to hold off on any
decision until after staff discusses the road project in more
detail and other alternatives that may be possible for the
Animal Shelter. It was the consensus of the Agency that a
committee of Vice Mayor Hollingsworth and Councilman Eck be
established to work with staff and meet with the Friends of
the Animals (FAIRE) to discuss alternatives for the Animal
Shelter. Executive Director Netter indicated that he would
attempt to call a meeting with the Council Committee and
representatives of FAIRE prior to the October 27th, 1992 City
Council meeting.
4. Other items for discussion - None
There being i
adjourned the
dinner prior
at 7:00 p.m.
o further business, Mayor /Chairperson Spiro
meeting at approximately 6:30 p.m. to break for
;o the regularly scheduled City Council meeting
Mayor /Chairperson
INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Joseph D. Netter
City Manager
FROM:
Michael L. Harrow
Finance Director
RE: Fiscal 1991/92 - Review of Actual DATE: September 3, 1992
Revenues and Expenditures to Budget
The results of operations for fiscal year 1991 -92 are hereby
presented. I have attached revenue and expenditure reports which
disclose the actual revenues and expenditures as compared to the
approved budget. Also attached are June 30, 1992 balances for the
various reserve funds.
General fund revenues were 112.54% of budget, or $1,532,288 more
that anticipated. Certain lines items that require additional
explanation are as follows:
1. Real property transfer tax was over budget by $39,927, or
32 %. This was due to the increase in the City's tax rate in August
1991.
2. Sales and use tax was $302,019, or 11 %, under budget. The
actual amount increased 16% over the prior year's receipts which is
above the county -wide growth rate of approximately -3.4 %. The
budgeted shortfall occurred due to the City receiving one less quarter
of sales tax receipts from the newly opened stores as well as a
general decline in the sales tax base from the prior year.
3. Business licenses were $132,127, or 43 %, over budget due to
business growth, the excellent enforcement effort by the Finance
Department and the increase in the fee structure effective 1/1/92.
4. Golf course revenues were $74,183, or 16 %, over budget due to
the lack of rain and therefore an extended playing season last winter
and also the increased non - resident rates that are in effect. Even
with the increased non - resident rates, our courses remain very
popular.
5. Grant income was $151,866 over budget. This was largely due
to the Tobacco Education Grant ($60,000) and the County of Sonoma
Grant (booking fee credit and transfer tax credit - $73,000) both were
unbudgeted.
6. Recreation revenues were $143,534 or 19 %, over budget due to
the addition of new programs and the continuing popularity of our fine
recreational programs and facilities.
7. Performing arts center revenues were $111,276, or 29 %, under
budget due to sluggish ticket sales.
8. Miscellaneous income was $1,338,246 over budget. This
category is a catch -all for revenues not budgeted elsewhere and
generally reflects unbudgeted items such as insurance recoveries, DUI
fines, hazardous material chargebacks, donations, sale of unused city
equipment, etc. 'During 1991 -92 the City received a refund for prior
P.E.R.S. payments (AB 702 refund) in the amount of $501,409. The
City's P.E.R.S. account had a surplus and received another refund for
$86,928.
General fund expenditures were 101.13% of budget, or $170,920
more than anticipated. Certain items that require additional
explanation are as follows:
1. Legal services was $76,750, or 211 %, over budget. Of this
amount, $72,000 was incurred in connection with the rent control
litigation.
2. Planning department was $53,508, or 33 %, over budget. This
overage was cause by expenditures for the current general plan update.
3. Public safety personnel was $211,540, or 4 %, over budget.
This was due to higher than expected fire call -outs which resulted in
additional costs as well as higher than expected overtime costs.
4. Animal Control & Shelter was $23,263, or 28% over budget.
This was due to higher than expect professional services and part -time
labor. A portion ($6,000) of the professional services overage was
paid for by spay- neuter deposits which had been forfeited. This
amount shows up as a revenue.
5. The Golf Courses were $28,958 over budget. This amount was
directly related to the Golf Course Corporations bonds being called on
7/1/92. This amount was funded in June 1992.
The final results for fiscal year 1991 -92 went according to the
budget. This is partly good news because there were no major negative
occurrences. The bad news is the 1991 -92 budget provided for reserve
reductions to fund operating expenses. In 1991 -92, the General Fund
Reserve contributed $950,000 to the General Fund. The Miscellaneous
Reserve (from CDA loan repayments) contributed $148,000 to the General
Fund and $138,000 to the Infrastructure Reserve which had a negative
balance at year end.
The major revenue and expense deviations are listed above. It
should be noted that the Community Development Agency made substantial
payments for prior years' administration fees charged by the General
Fund. This amounted to an actual cash payment from the Agency to the
City of approximately $953,000 which was $503,000 more than provided
for in the budget. At June 30, 1992, the Community Development Agency
still owes the City $135,090 for administration fees which are all
related to 1991 -92.
The General Fund Reserve currently has a balance of $1,611,012.
This amounts to approximately 11% of the 1992 -93 General Fund
expenses. The Reserve detail as of June 30, 1992 is provided for your
information.
Should you have any questions or wish to discuss these reports in
more detail, please contact me.
RESERVES
6/30/92
Balance
General Fund Reserve $1,611,012
Special Reserves:
Capital Improvements and
Infrastructure Maintenance 0
Wine Center /Tourist Facility 111,676
Self Insured Losses:
Property & Liability 23,000
Worker's Compensation 258,547
Retired Employee Medical Ins. 168,000
Miscellaneous Reserve
(From CDA Theatre (P.A.C.)Pmts) 232,053
Reserve for Dev. of Addit.
Recreational Facilities 382,092
Total Special Reserves $1,175,368
TOTAL ALL RESERVES $2,786,380
-13-
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK- 1991 /92 REVENUE REPORT
1991 -92 6/30/92 % OF $Over(Under)
REVENUES BUDGET BALANCE BUDGET Budget
Property Taxes
Property Taxes - Secured
Property Taxes - Unsecured
H.O.P.T.R.
Total Property Taxes
Other Taxes
Real Property Transfer Tax
Transient Occupancy Tax
Sales and Use Tax
Franchises
P.G. & E.
Multivision Cable TV
Total Other Taxes
Licenses and Permits
Business Licenses
Animal Licenses
Spay /Neuter Forfeits
Building Permits
''otal License & Permits
Fines, Forfeits & Penalties
Vehicle Code Fines
Other Court Fines
Total Fines, Forfeits & Pen.
Revenue Fr Use Of Money & Prop.
Investment Earnings
Rent: Golf Courses
Rent: Stadium
Rent: Billboard Land Lease
Rent -Land North of Big 4
CDA Land Lease(Theater)
Rent -Royal Coach Chevron
Rent - School Buildings
Rent /Royalties: Misc
Rent - Channel 22 Lot Rental
Total Rev Use of Money & Prop.
Revenue from Other Agencies
State Motor Vehicle In Lieu
Off Highway MV License Fee
State Trailer Coach in Lieu
State Cigarette Tax
Grants - General Fund
$2,150,000
70,000
55,000
$2,275,000
$125,000
800,000
2,650,000
225,000
200,000
$4,000,000
$310,000
28,000
0
250,000
$588,000
$80,000
500
$80,500
$1,400,000
450,000
3,000
6,900
2,400
20,000
5,000
119,500
2,000
0
$2,008,800
$1,370,000
700
22,000
50,000
7,000
$2,140,938
80,651
60,557
$2,282,146
$164,927
800,946
2,347,981
231,199
211,660
$3,756,713
$442,127
45,553
10,632
281,539
$779,851
$55,607
2,918
$58,525
1,356,419
524,183
2,854
8,325
2,600
20,000
5,824
90,200
318
9,384
$2,020,107
$1,268,032
644
21,893
24,710
158,866
99.58%
($9,062)
115.22%
10,651
110.10%
5,557
100.31%
$7,146
131.94%
100.12%
88.60%
102.76%
105.83%
93.92%
142.62%
162.69%
112.62%
132.63%
69.51%
583.60%
72.70%
96.89%
116.49%
95.13%
120.65%
108.33%
100.00%
116.48%
75.48%
15.90%
0.00%
100.56%
92.56%
92.00%
99.51%
49.42%
2269.51%
$39,927
946
(302,019)
6,199
11,660
($243,287)
$132,127
17,553
10,632
31,539
$191,851
($24,393)
2,418
($21,975)
($43,581)
74,183
(146)
1,425
200
0
824
(29,300)
(1,682)
9,384
$11,307
($101,968)
(56)
(107)
(25,290)
151,866
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK- 1991 /92 REVENUE REPORT
Charges for Current Services
Zoning & Subdivision Fees
Rent Appeals Board
Sale of Maps and Lists
Spec. Public Safety Svcs.
Animal Shelter Fees
Bingo Revenue
Engineering, Plan Checking
Sub -Total Chgs. For Curr Svc.
Recreation Related Income
Sports Center Income
Swimming Pools
Special Contract Classes
R.P. Community Cntr Rentals
Burton Ave Cntr Rentals
Recreation Programs
Senior Center
Total Recreation Income
Performing Arts Center
Assess. District Admin
Library Landscape Maint.
School Grounds Maint.
Total Charges Current Svcs.
Misc Income /Donations
Annexation Fees
TOTAL GF REVENUES
Utility Fund Operations
Water
Sewer
Garbage
Total Utility Fund
OTAL REVENUES
$15,000
5,000
1,500
12,000
15,000
15,000
20,000
$83,500
$255,400
161,200
90,000
51,500
15,000
162,200
19,200
$754,500
381,500
1,000
1,400
150,000
$1,371,900
$110,000
0
$12,214,900
$2,385,000
4,605,000
1,990,000
$8,980,000
$21,194,900
$13,723
44,107
1,326
14,905
16,534
13,407
16,185
$120,187
$316,906
207,039
90,797
71,251
16,322
164,845
30,874
$898,034
$270,224
4,000
1,908
150,000
$1,444,353
$1,448,246
188,200
$13,747,188
$2,432,475
4,529,100
2,103,540
$9,065,115
$22,812,303
91.49%
882.14%
88.40%
124.21%
110.23%
89.38%
80.93%
143.94%
124.08%
128.44%
100.89%
138.35%
108.81%
101.63%
160.80%
119.02%
70.83%
400.00%
136.29%
100.00%
105.28%
1316.59%
112.54%
101.99%
98.35%
105.71%
100.95%
107.63%
($1,277)
39,107
(174)
2,905
1,534
(1,593)
(3,815)
$36,687
$61,506
45,839
797
19,751
1,322
2,645
11,674
$143,534
(111,276)
3,000
508
0
$72,453
$1,338,246
188,200
$1,532,288
$47,475
(75,900)
113,540
$85,115
$1,617,403
1991 -92
6/30/92
% OF
$Over(Under)
REVENUES
BUDGET
BALANCE
BUDGET
Budget
Misc. Other Revenues
1,000
11,866
1186.60%
10,866
P.O.S.T. Reimbursements
20,000
7,212
36.06%
(12,788)
SB 90 Mandated Costs
10,000
4,569
45.69%
(5,431)
Other Financing Sources
300,000
------ - - - - --
271,255
----- - - - - --
90.42%
- - - - - --
(28,745)
Total Rev Other Agencies
$1,780,700
------ - - - - --
$1,769,047
----- - - - - --
99.35%
- - - - - --
---- - - - - --
($11,653)
---- - - - - --
Charges for Current Services
Zoning & Subdivision Fees
Rent Appeals Board
Sale of Maps and Lists
Spec. Public Safety Svcs.
Animal Shelter Fees
Bingo Revenue
Engineering, Plan Checking
Sub -Total Chgs. For Curr Svc.
Recreation Related Income
Sports Center Income
Swimming Pools
Special Contract Classes
R.P. Community Cntr Rentals
Burton Ave Cntr Rentals
Recreation Programs
Senior Center
Total Recreation Income
Performing Arts Center
Assess. District Admin
Library Landscape Maint.
School Grounds Maint.
Total Charges Current Svcs.
Misc Income /Donations
Annexation Fees
TOTAL GF REVENUES
Utility Fund Operations
Water
Sewer
Garbage
Total Utility Fund
OTAL REVENUES
$15,000
5,000
1,500
12,000
15,000
15,000
20,000
$83,500
$255,400
161,200
90,000
51,500
15,000
162,200
19,200
$754,500
381,500
1,000
1,400
150,000
$1,371,900
$110,000
0
$12,214,900
$2,385,000
4,605,000
1,990,000
$8,980,000
$21,194,900
$13,723
44,107
1,326
14,905
16,534
13,407
16,185
$120,187
$316,906
207,039
90,797
71,251
16,322
164,845
30,874
$898,034
$270,224
4,000
1,908
150,000
$1,444,353
$1,448,246
188,200
$13,747,188
$2,432,475
4,529,100
2,103,540
$9,065,115
$22,812,303
91.49%
882.14%
88.40%
124.21%
110.23%
89.38%
80.93%
143.94%
124.08%
128.44%
100.89%
138.35%
108.81%
101.63%
160.80%
119.02%
70.83%
400.00%
136.29%
100.00%
105.28%
1316.59%
112.54%
101.99%
98.35%
105.71%
100.95%
107.63%
($1,277)
39,107
(174)
2,905
1,534
(1,593)
(3,815)
$36,687
$61,506
45,839
797
19,751
1,322
2,645
11,674
$143,534
(111,276)
3,000
508
0
$72,453
$1,338,246
188,200
$1,532,288
$47,475
(75,900)
113,540
$85,115
$1,617,403
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK- 1991 /92 REVENUE REPORT
0
1991 -92
6/30/92
% OF
$Over(Under)
REVENUES
BUDGET
BALANCE
BUDGET
Budget
Jther Fund Revenues
Gas Tax
$1,437,000
$829,111
57.70%
($607,889)
Capital Outlay Fees
389,700
454,221
116.56%
64,521
Sewer Service Conn. Fees
1,360,000
1,654,563
121.66%
294,563
Water Conn. Fees
100,000
281,853
281.85%
181,853
Per Acre Development Fees
300,000
793,609
264.54%
493,609
Traffic Signals Fees
160,000
207,523
129.70%
47,523
Transp. Dev. Act (TDA)
238,983
216,229
90.48%
(22,754)
Capital Project Fund
0
145,885
-
145,885
Assessment Districts
0
34,261
-
34,261
Copeland Creek Drain. Fees
14,700
11,346
-
(3,354)
Total Other Funds
------ - - - - --
$4,000,383
----- - - - - --
$4,628,601
- - - - - --
115.70%
----- - - - - --
$628,218
- - - - --
TOTAL REVENUES
------ - - - - --
$25,195,283
----- - - - - --
$27,440,904
- - - - - --
108.91%
-----
$2,245,621
0
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK- 1991/92 EXPENDITURE REPORT
1991 -92 6/30/92 % OF (Over)Under
CATEGORY /DEPARTMENT BUDGET BALANCE BUDGET Budget
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
--------------- - - - --
City Council
City Manager
Finance & Accounting
Data Processing
Stores
Legal Services
Planning Dept. & Comm.
Personnel
Rent Appeals Board
Internal Audit
City Office Building
City Office Annex
General Gov't -Non Dept.
Non - Departmental- Benefits
Youth & Families Program
TOTAL GENERAL GOVT
PUBLIC SAFETY
-------------- - - - - --
Public Safety Personnel
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Animal Control & Shelter
Public Safety Bldg - Central
Public Safety Bldg -North
Public Safety Bldg -South
Civil Defense /Haz Mat
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY
PUBLIC WORKS
City Engineer
Inspection
General
Maint. of Trees & Parkways
Maintenance of Streets
Street Lighting
Traffic Signals
Storm Drains & Drainage
Weed Abatement
$58,845
333,675
685,925
137,740
71,575
36,400
162,625
170,945
30,800
89,655
42,000
18,000
1,073,275
79,400
101,515
$3,092,375
$5,080,990
677,550
260,500
83,860
48,000
26,900
17,500
18,200
$6,213,500
$301,950
277,635
1,534,580
161,400
130,000
204,000
65,000
5,210
3,200
$60,266
336,144
678,566
111,282
63,295
113,150
216,133
153,627
29,650
88,915
45,907
22,283
1,043,188
101,152
72,703
$3,136,261
$5,292,530
544,603
230,422
107,123
52,260
23,204
8,147
16,167
$6,274,456
$290,489
261,398
1,540,131
159,882
129,298
226,581
70,111
399
4,733
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS $2,682,975 $2,683,022
------ - - - - -- ---- - - - - --
102.41% ($1,421)
100.74%
(2,469)
98.93%
7,359
80.79%
26,458
88.43%
8,280
310.85%
(76,750)
132.90%
(53,508)
89.87%
17,318
96.27%
1,150
99.17%
740
109.30%
(3,907)
123.79%
(4,283)
97.20%
30,087
127.40%
(21,752)
71.62%
28,812
101.42% ($43,886)
104.16% ($211,540)
80.38% 132,947
88.45%
30,078
127.74%
(23,263)
108.88%
(4,260)
86.26%
3,696
46.55%
9,353
88.83%
2,033
- - - - -- -----
100.98%
- - - - --
($60,956)
96.20% $11,461
94.15%
16,237
100.36%
(5,551)
99.06%
1,518
99.46%
702
111.07%
(22,581)
107.86%
(5,111)
7.66%
4,811
147.91%
(1,533)
- - - - -- -----
100.00%
- - - - -- -----
- - - - --
($47)
- - - - --
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK- 1991/92 EXPENDITURE REPORT
GOLF COURSE
--------------- - - - --
Golf Course General
TOTAL GOLF COURSE
$3,000 $31,958
------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
$3,000 $31,958
------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
1065.27% ($28,958)
- - - - -- ----- - - - - --
1065.27% ($28,958)
- - - - -- ----- - - - - --
1991 -92
6/30/92
% OF
(Over)Under
CATEGORY /DEPARTMENT
BUDGET
BALANCE
BUDGET
Budget
PARKS AND RECREATION
--------------- - - - --
Park Maintenance General
$433,500
$445,731
102.82%
($12,231)
Alicia Park
35,700
30,433
85.25%
5,267
Benecia Park
20,900
18,000
86.12%
2,900
Caterpillar Park
6,500
5,451
83.86%
1,049
Colegio Park Area
23,700
17,874
75.42%
5,826
Dorotea Park
18,000
18,546
103.03%
(546)
Eagle Park
30,900
31,331
101.39%
(431)
Golis Park
32,400
35,679
110.12%
(3,279)
Honeybee Park
14,300
13,025
91.08%
1,275
Ladybug Park
15,500
13,358
86.18%
2,142
Sunrise Park
41,900
38,710
92.39%
3,190
Magnolia Park
8,300
592
7.13%
7,708
Roberts Lake Park
17,200
4,563
26.53%
12,637
Rainbow Park
12,600
11,813
93.75%
787
Recreation Commission
3,850
4,800
124.68%
(950)
Recreation Administration
367,765
361,888
98.40%
5,877
Contract Classes
63,000
66,091
104.91%
(3,091)
Recreation Programs
178,100
171,314
96.19%
6,786
Senior Citizen Center
129,465
130,560
100.85%
(1,095)
Senior Citizen Mini -Bus
19,500
20,248
103.84%
(748)
R.P. Community Stadium
48,100
43,375
90.18%
4,725
Alicia Pool
42,750
37,663
88.10%
5,087
Benecia Pool
46,500
43,599
93.76%
2,901
Ladybug Pool
31,900
31,561
98.94%
339
Honeybee Pool
65,800
100,641
152.95%
(34,841)
Sports Center
304,870
301,888
99.02%
2,982
Comm. Center Complex Gr.
22,100
25,031
113.26%
(2,931)
R.P. Community Center
87,350
102,770
117.65%
(15,420)
Burton Avenue Rec. Center
22,800
28,795
126.29%
(5,995)
YMCA /Soccer Bldg.
1,000
0
0.00%
1,000
Ladybug Recreation Bldg.
11,500
11,357
98.76%
143
Scout Hut
400
323
80.75%
77
School Grounds
110,000
107,701
97.91%
2,299
TOTAL PARKS AND REC.
------ - - - - --
$2,268,150
------ - - - - --
----- - - - - --
$2,274,711
----- - - - - --
- - - - --
100.29%
- - - - --
----- - - - - --
($6,561)
----- - - - - --
GOLF COURSE
--------------- - - - --
Golf Course General
TOTAL GOLF COURSE
$3,000 $31,958
------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
$3,000 $31,958
------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
1065.27% ($28,958)
- - - - -- ----- - - - - --
1065.27% ($28,958)
- - - - -- ----- - - - - --
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK- 1991/92 EXPENDITURE REPORT
1991 -92 6/30/92 % OF (Over)Under
CATEGORY /DEPARTMENT BUDGET BALANCE BUDGET Budget
OTHER
--------------- - - - --
Cultural Arts
Performing Arts Center
Library
Youth Advisory Commission
Tobacco Education Grant
Booking Fees /County
Prop Tax Admin Fee /County
Sexual Assault Exams
TOTAL OTHER
TOTAL GF EXPENDITURES
UTILITY OPERATION
--------------- - - - --
Water
Sewer
Garbage
TOTAL UTILITIES
'OTAL ALL DEPARTMENTS
$10,000
642,775
3,500
350
0
115,000
40,000
0
$811,625
$15,071,625
$2,480,550
5,370,666
1,990,000
$9,841,216
$24,912,841
$5,000
667,805
1,735
321
65,103
57,456
40,567
4,150
$842,137
$15,242,545
$2,161,594
5,128,904
2,068,642
$9,359,140
$24,601,685
50.00%
103.89%
49.57%
91.71%
49.96%
101.42%
$5,000
(25, 030)
1,765
29
(65,103)
57,544
(567)
(4,150)
103.76% ($30,512)
- - - - -- ----- - - - - --
101.13% ($170,920)
87.14%
$318,956
95.50%
241,762
103.95%
(78,642)
- - - - -- -----
95.10%
- - - - --
$482,076
- - - - -- -----
98.75%
- - - - -- -----
------ -----
- - - - --
$311,156
- - - - --
- - - - --
I mm�r�tnwo�ul�o
1�
Cnwolnotnmtnwtnor�-- owr`NrnLJI
i w
ter`
i� ii
fz
I mwovmovr�C��wN
i LO
wrn rornwwvmwmmr`orna�mor�
I Ln
ro�
1 LO II
W
1 -- NGlf1r -NrnOmw
lf)
(ern r`NNmwN�tn-- +VOaoNtnlflN
I m
Nw
I V II
11
}
I wwrnrnNf"7rnf-0 -+
't
Cn- Lo CO- +117Io(n�(310 LfINOOml7]
1 M
x M
I T 11
O
1 m m v m
1 rn
I — Ill V v + m •, ••
I N
cn
1 11
~
I
I al
I lYl
iR
I trt I I
}O1
iR
1
I#t
III
fY
I
I
I
i II
a1
I
I wvwwrnNmm.,��
1 0]
mmowmOmm nomoOowmN -'�
I —
;m
I OC111
=
I cmNmrnNm --•NOW
I M
00 OWID -Nm m MMMOMI-
I m
vS
1 N 11
I_
I OMM-- -rte 'TOM
I rn
ww 't w 0- N NLnvN CO
I rn
Cnm
I m 11
CZ, 0 lY
1 -� m N V' LD
I N
'T -+ 'T CO LO •-• v •-+ N •-+
I w
O7
I rn 11
E •-° C
I -
I N
1 07
fYw
1 0
}I
I
If
Ea
I
I
1 11
LI I
x
\xxxxxxx< \xx\z \x x X.11 X X
I x
\\
I X 11
[1
F-
I InNrnLL) 7'r- 0CriwttIf)
I Ul
CO00—LnCQLOW0;00N000CD00
I P;
Lo CO
1 lD I
w
W
1 o0Crlr- 0) CC' 'tCo(0 LC' —
I N
M (J" 0 M 'T Cn- 01N0w0W0LD0ITLn ' t
11-
0LD
1 m II
F-
\U
1 . . . . . . . . . . .
1 .
. . . . .4 . . . . . . . . . .
1
1 11
Ci
I rO0- U)-- U:'-- 1:0I.1(r,0
1 V
RJUiO(�N NOICO CO0Il0N0MEDN
1 UJ
M'�T
I W II
W
-1
1 -- •-- •OJVrn-tLOM. -•-t 01
1 R!
OCn Cn O7 -•- rnCD(r)I, �0m0 Nm
1 0
1 m
I 1 11
U
m
I — — .-.. -. .-• — — '.
I
.. CU r. �
i
I if
Ul
i
I
1
F-
I UJ- CTiCnlf]NNNm�tN
i V
0000t17NwFri q - —NOf-0 LO 0NCO0
1 Ul
0) N
1 i t
I N 11
Q
i f`wLf,UlLT RI CU r`7
i -t
'tN 00'twwoojm MONOM --N
1 0
OD 111
1 Oit
m ^NU)CU00 Nr-rn7G
1 m
- rn Ul I- Lf)Cnw7 NONV N — CO
1 07
'7m
I •-• If
LL
1
Ln
Cl.
1 ('Q w Cn rn N co Cn —,,T - •
I , r_
Cn_ w Ln o N N O LO U) Ul - w
i
U) •-•
I -r 11
I
F-
I V -t U) m
I —
If) CU Lf) nt V -+ CO
I
In
w
1
1
L
I it
a
1
i
1
f II
J
I
I
I
I II
CY Q
i
I
CZ
1 0ITUiNfJ,w0WrIT0
1 O7
wrno0l0"0—m00000WRIM 0 0
1 Lt,
N0
1 r 11
aw
1 007r- --01't U)NCUO
1 N
CnV 0000 NN 't NNmw - -•
1 0
r-
I Il II
CL
I NMWM --•N wow•-
1 0
OM U1-- IT NRI - Nrn(0 -
1 0)
O7
I O 11
}- Y.rn
=
I - R -
I ..
.. - ..
I -
1
a W rn
F-
1 0 m U) Ul
I N
U) --• m
I O7
..
-11
I -+ 11
W
ZO~
Z
O
I --•
1 #t
I N
I
*
I Of
#t
I #t II
=z
I
I it
O(E O
a m
Ul
1
LL W W
I
I
O::)z
1 0000000000010
000000000000000000010
001011
Z=)
1 0000000000010
W- +000000000 0000000
1 N
NO
I N II
}W'-,
JF-
L 000000000Om
I V
V'CTmm-- om0000 m000llo
107
q
1'7'11
f✓�
c
I I
I
. .. _ . . . .
-
�+W
OC'7
1 0UIQ,It NLO N fl- Lf,V •-+
I LO
LO f-- +Lf1LDNmNU) U)wEDUl LD
I U)
OV
I �t 11
U I7:
N m '� N
in N U, v LO -� CU
I --•
w
I w I1
LL
z O
Cm
I
I N
i m
i
I
1
I�
I
11
Intl
i 11
I
I
1
I If
I 11
w
Ld
w F}- w LnwIf)
W
} In U DE WUU UIUI
F-
Ln a
o w z Ln -. D C w
In
U)
J Li I Ul Ln (r
I tC J U o� Ul 3 fY = Ul
Ul
Ul
CJW W U
(I In (X In IInW m W CCYWUC
W
O
F- CJInU)Ul
EF- OWaW3 DEfYfY JWIflmm
fY
J7-
ZI- CWIrIWO
w- m -a -0 a ULn DU
z
-(C
In
WZMJCOJ
m
lL CJJJa \9jmIl JCLa
1-
F-J
Ul
Ln J CLW CJUr -+
W ••1-W
JCLLna\ O Y- .JJC 3
-
a J ilzLnuc7
3UlLLz
a CL I_ z (if a=, CCZZCL
0
LLD
J
C F- O W
Z
I W OaWOOOO
Z
00
= MZZ>-IiF -J
W
a
F-
Ul F- }WF -MOU z
� Ow
E- W -O -F- zUULnLn0
a
a J
UlCCU1W(7E•-+tn2Cin�
WF-
•- +w�F- wC)InJ =F- �UwCCCUIUi=
x
C
LL
WWF-3 aJWUIQF- I
CY -flol
- I U F- \a(aJ -U(rf ffWWM
W
- F-
O
DMMCSZ - -U F-fYa
a-
CY
ZZWUWJUZOZOO
JzJ•-
•wxiLWOCJDUmLLMZZOZO
J
OQ,
a
WWJC110cof ollIX
CwCCYDCLLIlLWwoC3LLzOOfYOa
C
C
7E011OWLLUaUMO
F- aUIL-
0CL0Mln =F- CLLa0•- •UUaUa
H
F-U
1-
w =
fY (
O x
F- w
O
f-
w
z
W
z
of Ni IA (A to tl
�U W
II
II
II
it
0A 0 0 0 O O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00000000000"000
Vf! OODD IA � (�S
II
0) II
II
II
tl
y N C 00(700 X00000000000.- 000000000000M000
v p (�� Op OQ i t
00 au 11
m u�i (`i h
(L V> 64
u
M N"' (QOOh00 M 00000. - 000000000000000000 fpOOat)Oc O O
u
N 0p di Op
N O f0 O tp et 0 000 N O M N N ii
(O O m N G
Z Cl) l
it
11
N a L 00 0 0 N
O� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D O N c
O _ (� tYj t7j
Ot n
'I7 — h h l
N 1 �; Z; it
II
N ONO�OOOOPP 000000000000 O0O 000
� h� N (0N (0 h M O h M u
III Q N
CL I
Vi :A II
M
�w O C O�(OOr -M t(! OM010o0(0(000NMOoN 00��tN0NOOh00CY)(.0 Cpp W h0 Oho f` O r I!
W Z &t lD 0) CA (0 .- C4 p� M OD O to (O h 0 (M to 0 � O — Op t� N N M c I
W Q
SD CO 04 NM fD v (O � 0) 0) hQ OD .- (D r II
�ivv
a C) it
X W > i0 64 O g y (O M � N (.j M N O to Mt ^ O O O (� N O ^ O N O f0 ~ N 0 c��t t` O v l
ZQN C UO o rti^ N oOP M `1 Vh'. N c0O v N N M N N O M l
S U' Q O 0 vv� vN " ~ U r M �� ONO N ( 11
Ozz �0g-o w % en n
��O LL�--m v is 4
W o0 00000 0 00 00 oo(n000000000o to
> s(spppgg OD� gs$ $ss g� ass r- h h
Ua. O
'a 04
NNtONNN OD — (D MME (S IN IA If,� (00 lDr 0) 00�(V (D It
F ?' g m fR MV► fR u� (V V " II
� � g C
N � � s s �SODOM08MOOM81) (O � N g O (N o (O N t0 — 0 h t0
1I1I1 I 1 16 _ N O CINI (0 too )
(O
m I
N N II
000 N Oh O M MMM NMO W 0000,4- (O rt RU) 0) M N V M M
0) > M(� pM YoM hN MN(00Mh MwhM NNh Nto ih M (0 O O II
;a OCL al M -rz q('a Mi-�: 8), N 0OOOM.h..h lhNM 9 ��T oDM` - 'O
c� N v V' h Cl) M LO N 00 M y N V hM.. (p O v I, r C( .- M .- (A .- M M (0 to N
69 d9 � .- .- v (D h N N IA II
LL
(OhCv vUN)) NM �hltAp 01A0(V IAMaOpOMN7NMOtN00 N(O cdf'hOM c+h7 (Op ((Dp p) it
MahON 8 c0�(010 bi $)�(O(n (nN N.0 (h0 (r -L In N mO(OM N 0 � 01
0 'IT 0 ( � i) } O ffi II
p M (A r to (O r N N N N N M II
cq 0- w w hw tl
ii
O(O (n �YhM N Mh 00 to (O MOIP)(O oOOMhNO(OOOD O(O M_NODNMh `7 F O 611
(V (A 00 (n N(O M (ONE V' 0000 to Mhh N V owet0 8 U lhA. II
M DOMNNtD (V (C ('q 04 (O co (O to (O �Np h0M 1D0� 0) (3) .-N
=0� (V c) OtN �t N N (p (V 't (O V 4- hN 00 .- 00 (MOMS II
[T- (O l0 .- N h O (O II
U w w H M
(a n
W
}} N
w �� w Fz Q c O
} N —w m UO S °� >> (n
0 � LLaa F-- -i ma -� w (L O W H
a zN N i0 W�aw �n 0 �o�zUU z LL (0
mc9zzQw z WHO m °wNa °1aia co c�U (<nz�Y�w��¢ZNZC9(nw o w g O
i)0 U))F - QZQ > >t' WWWOUE QzZmW�� }�O�ac=7z�OW29O� XW c9 F-
WN¢r(q(�J W QW�OZ�LLW�����QJW ~UJ�W��WF -��0- W F- O O
D of ®w W.J d'
Z_QJ_Ud'W ,J z� L x J_ZOUF -YUF-' W (n UUJ JU�jUn -F-IL (nOp�> J Q Q X
W�ZUZW O wncr Wf. R EOO W QJ >u1�SZUm2 W I��ZOF -OZO¢ Q F- Q
>o�QOF -� H n ¢¢ >�X0ILL00aww05(n �wau ci0������ F- w m F-
�¢LLLLCi?� O tx(naOwF- m0a.m()mF- ¢o? >uu.a >cn O w c)a¢a LL a F- 0 O v z
:VENUES:
ADMISSIONS
FUNDRAISING
FACILITY RENTALS
CONCESSIONS
INTEREST EARNED
MISCELLANEOUS
)TAL REVENUES
;PENDITURES:
SALARIES -FT EMPLOYEES
PART -TIME LABOR
OVERTIME
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
TRAINING & EDUCATION
OX OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POSTAGE
SPEC DEPT SUPPLIES
H EAT /L I (,HT /POWER
TELEPHONE
ADVERTISING /PUBLICITY
VEHICLE GAS &: OIL
CONCESSIONS
FACILITY R & M
VEHICLE R &. M
SPEC. DEPT EQUIP R &M
OFFICE EQUIP R &M
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ARTIST FEES
PRODUCTION
FUNDRAISING
PROMOTIONS
TRAVEL &. MEETINGS
)TAL EXPENDITURES
=T PROFIT (LOSS)
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
ADMINISTRATION DIVISION -DEPT. 6210
JUNE 1992
91 -92
BUDGET
$0
25,000
0
0
50,000
2,500
$77,500
;190,000
49,000
850
69,350
0
950
3,000
1,500
0
52,000
5 , 500
10,700
600
6,000
20,300
175
6,600
1 '000
10,000
5,700
0
0
2,000
900
0
$436,625
($359,125)
a c= a c a= a s
CURRENT
MONTH
$0
30
0
72
630
52
$784
17 6G-13
3,403
0
5 , 850
0
0
240
177
0
5,216
1,057
(774)
174
705
911
7
703
197
(139)
0
0
0
0
13
0
$35,403
($34,619)
YEAR -TO-
DATE
$0
3,616
0
975
25 , 237
4,6'13
$34,441
20'1 , 653
37,189
252
68,068
65
0
4,922
6,839
4,697
42,526
9,611
9 , 043
789
7,087
20,352
596
8,070
1,478
6,097
160
0
0
882
989
207
$431,578
($397,137)
s a s a a x a a a 3
12 MONTH
BUDGET
$0
25,000
0
0
50,000
2,500
$77,500
,1`10,0U0
49,000
850
69,850
0
950
3,000
1,500
0
52,000
5,500
10,700
600
6,000
20,300
175
6,600
1,000
10,000
5,700
0
0
2,000
900
0
$436,625
($359,125)
sassy =a:a ==
(OVER)
UNDER
12 MONTH
BUDGET
$0
21,384
0
(975)
24,763
(2,113)
43 , 059
($11,653)
11,811
592
1,782
(65)
950
(1,922)
(5,339)
(4,697)
9,474
(4, 111 )
1,657
( 1 , 087)
(52)
(42'1)
1 , 470)
(478)
3,903
5,540
0
0
1,118
(89)
(207)
$5 , 047
$38,012
s =ssacaa
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
PACIFIC ALLIANCE STAGE CO. DIVISION -DEPT. 6211
JUNE 1992
PENDITURES:
SALARIES -FT EMPLOYEES
0
$0
$0
$0
(OVER)
PART -TIME LABOR
0
686
4,198
0
UNDER
OVERTIME
91 -92
CURRENT
YEAR -TO-
12 MONTH
12 MONTH
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
.BUDGET
MONTH
DATE
BUDGET
BUDGET
VENUES:
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
ADMISSIONS
$68,000
($39)
$63,093
$68,000
$4,907
FUNDRAISING
0
0
200
0
(200)
FACILITY RENTALS
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSIONS
6,300
9
4,122
6,300
2,178
INTEREST EARNED
0
0
0
0
0
MISCELLANEOUS
0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - -
0
0
,TAL REVENUES
$74,300
($30)
--
$67,415
-- - - - - --
$74,300
-- - - - - --
$6,885
PENDITURES:
SALARIES -FT EMPLOYEES
0
$0
$0
$0
$(D
PART -TIME LABOR
0
686
4,198
0
(4,19?)
OVERTIME
0
0
0
0
0
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
0
10
61
i)
(6'1)
BOX OFFICE SUPPLIES
700
0
1,083
700
(383)
OFFICE SUPPLIES
0
0
0
0
0
'OSTAGE
0
0
0
0
0
:PEC DEPT SUPPLIES
1,650
156
168
1,650
1,432
HEAT /LIGHT /POWER
0
0
0
0
0
TELEPHONE
0
0
0
0
0
ADVERTISING; /PUBLICITY
21,500
6,829
18,551
21,500
2,949
VEHICLE GAS & OIL
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSIONS
0
0
0
0
0
FACILITY R& M
0
0
0
0
0
VEHICLE R& M
0
0
0
0
0
SPEC. DEPT EQUIP R &M
0
0
0
0
0
OFFICE EQUIP REM
0
0
0
0
0
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
0
0
7,670
0
(7,670)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
0
153
0
(153)
ARTIST FEES
41,480
545
48,430
41,480
(6,950)
PRODUCTION
7,000
(7)
12,838
7,000
(5,838)
FUNDRAISING
0
0
0
0
0
PROMOTIONS
0
0
0
0
0
>TAL EXPENDITURES
-- - - - - --
$72,330
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
$8,219
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
$93,152
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
$72,330
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
($20,822)
:T PROFIT (LOSS)
$1,970
asxsaxaaa
($8,249)($25,737)
oxsx =oa.
xxxaacxx
$1,970
oa =asaaa
-- - - - - --
$27,707
axxeaaxa
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
ROHNERT PARK SYMPHONY DIVISION -DEPT. 6212
JUNE 1992
(OVER)
PENDITURES:
SALARIES -FT EMPLOYEES
$0
$0
$0
$0
UNDER
PART -TIME LABOR
91 -92
CURRENT
YEAR -TO-
12 MONTH
12 MONTH
OVERTIME
BUDGET
MONTH
DATE
BUDGET
BUDGET
:VENUES:
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
ADMISSIONS
$53,000
$0
$40,264
$53,000
$12,736
FUNDRAISING
0
0
0
0
0
FACILITY RENTALS
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSIONS
4,900
0
1,068
4,900
3,832
INTEREST EARNED
0
0
0
0
0
MISCELLANEOUS
0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - -
0
0
�TAL REVENUES
$57,900
$0
--
$41,332
-- - - - - --
$57,900
-- - - - - --
$16,568
PENDITURES:
SALARIES -FT EMPLOYEES
$0
$0
$0
$0
$.0
PART -TIME LABOR
0
0
0
0
0
OVERTIME
0
0
0
0
0
'7MPLOYEE BENEFITS
0
0
0
0
0
OX OFFICE SUPPLIES
800
0
344
800
456
OFFICE SUPPLIES
0
0
0
0
0
POSTAGE
0
0
0
0
0
SPEC DEPT SUPPLIES
1,350
0
0
1,350
1,350
HEAT /LIGHT /POWER
0
0
0
0
0
TELEPHONE
0
0
0
0
0
ADVERTISING /PUBLICITY
8,100
1,617
11,607
8,100
(3,507)
VEHICLE GAS & OIL
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSIONS
0
0
0
0
0
FACILITY R& M
0
0
0
0
0
VEHICLE R& M
0
0
0
0
0
SPEC. DEPT EQUIP R &M
0
0
0
0
0
OFFICE EQUIP R &M
0
0
0
0
0
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
41,520
139
42,788
41,520
(1,268)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
0
0
0
0
ARTIST FEES
0
200
4,128
0
(4,128)
PRODUCTION
2,000
0
1,328
2,000
672
FUNDRAISING
0
0
800
0
(800)
PROMOTIONS
0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - - --
67
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - -
(67)
►TAL EXPENDITURES
$53,770
-- - - - - --
$1,956
-- - - - - --
$61,062
-- - - - - --
- --
$53,770
-- - - - - --
--------
($7,292)
!T PROFIT (LOSS)
$4,130
($1,956)($19,730)
$4,130
-- - - - - --
$23,860
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
NORTH COAST BALLET DIVISION -DEPT. 6213
JUNE 1992
(OVER)
UNDER
91 -92
CURRENT
YEAR -TO-
12 MONTH
12 MONTH
BUDGET
MONTH
DATE
BUDGET
BUDGET
VENUES:
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
4DMISSIONS
$58,000
$0
$49,086
$58,000
$8,914
FUNDRAISING
0
0
0
0
0
FACILITY RENTALS
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSION;
5,400
0
2,597
5,400
2,803
INTEREST EARNED
0
0
0
0
0
1ISCELLANEOLIS
0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - - --
0
--
0
TAL REVENUES
$63,400
$0
$51,683
- - - - --
63,400
-- - - - - --
$11,717
PENDITURES:
SALARIES-FT EMPLOYEES
$0
$0
$0
$0
10
FART -TIME LABOR
0
0
0
0
0
)VERTIME
0
0
0
0
0
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
0
0
0
0
0
PDX OFFICE SUPPLIES
350
0
401
350
(51)
7FICE SUPPLIES
0
0
0
0
0
POSTAGE
0
0
0
0
0
SPEC DEPT SUPPLIES
1,450
0
0
1,450
1,450
HEAT /LIGHT /POWER
0
0
0
0
0
TELEPHONE
0
0
0
0
0
ADVERTISING /PUBLICITY
9,700
2,842
15,978
9,700
(6,278)
VEHICLE GAS & OIL
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSIONS
0
0
0
0
0
FACILITY R &. M
0
0
0
0
0
VEHICLE R& M
0
0
0
0
0
SPEC. DEPT EQUIP R&M
0
0
0
0
0
OFFICE EQUIP R &M
0
0
0
0
0
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
36,200
5,278
39,866
36,200
(3,666)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
0
0
0
0
ARTIST FEES
0
0
0
0
0
PRODUCTION
5,000
972
4,598
5,000
402
FUNDRAISING
0
0
0
0
0
PROMOTIONS
0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - - --
87
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - - --
(87)
--
TAL EXPENDITURES
$52,700
-- - - - - --
$9,092
-- - - - - --
$60,930
-- - - - - --
$52,700
-- - - - - --
- - - - --
($8,230)
--
T PROFIT (LOSS)
$10,700
($9,092)
($9,247)
$10,700
- - - - --
$19,947
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
PRESENTATIONS DIVISION -DEPT. 6214
JUNE 1992
(OVER)
UNDER
CURRENT
YEAR -TO-
12 MONTH
12 MONTH
BUDGET
MONTH
DATE
BUDGET
BUDGET
:VENUES:
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
ADMISSIONS
$25,000
$312
$4,835
$25,000
$20,165
FUNDRAISING
0
0
0
0
0
FACILITY RENTALS
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSIONS
2,300
0
53
2,300
2,247
INTEREST EARNED
0
0
0
0
0
MISCELLANEOUS
0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - - --
0
0
0
►TAL REVENUES
$27,300
$312
-- - - - - --
$4,888
-- - - - - --
27,300
--------
$22,412
:PEN DITURES:
SALARIES -FT EMPLOYEES
$0
$0
$0
$O
$0
FART -TIME LABOR
0
0
0
0
0
OVERTIME
0
0
0
0
0
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
0
0
0
0
0
BOX OFFICE SUPPLIES
0
0
0
0
0
FFICE SUPPLIES
0
0
0
0
0
OSTAGE
0
0
0
0
0
SPEC DEPT SUPPLIES
800
0
0
800
800
HEAT /LIGHT /POWER
0
0
0
0
0
TELEPHONE
0
0
0
0
0
ADVERTISING /PUBLICITY
5,000
174
1,061
5,000
3,939
VEHICLE GAS & OIL
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSIONS
0
0
0
0
0
FACILITY R& M
0
0
0
0
0
VEHICLE R& M
0
0
0
0
0
SPEC. DEPT EQUIP R &M
0
0
0
0
0
OFFICE EQUIP R&M
0
0
0
0
0
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
0
0
0
0
0
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
0
0
0
0
ARTIST FEES
7,500
0
7,384
7,500
116
PRODUCTION
3,000
0
332
3,000
2,668
FUNDRAISING
0
0
0
0
0
PROMOTIONS
0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - - --
0
--
0
0
>TAL EXPENDITURES
$16,300
-- - - - - --
$174
-- - - - - --
- - - - --
$8,777
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
$16,300
--
-- - - - - --
$7,523
:T PROFIT (LOSS)
$11,000
$138
($3,8 89)
- - - - --
$11,000
-- - - - - --
$14,889
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
RENTALS DIVISION -DEPT. 6215
JUNE 1992
(OVER)
UNDER
91 -92
CURRENT
YEAR -TO-
12 MONTH
12 MONTH
BUDGET
MONTH
DATE
BUDGET
BUDGET
VENUES: --
- - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
ADMISSIONS
$0
1490
$5,642
$0
($5,642)
FUNDRAISING
0
0
0
0
0
FACILITY RENTALS
63,000
10,134
63,355
65,000
4,645
CONCESSIONS
0
521
1,469
0
(1,469)
INTEREST EARNED
0
0
0
0
0
MISCELLANEOUS
0
0
--
0
0
0
--
TAL REVENUES
- - - - --
$68,000
- - - - --
$11 ,255
-- - - - - --
$701,466
-- - - - - --
68,000
-- - - - - --
($2,466)
PENDITURES:
c >ALARIES -FT EMPLOYEES
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TO
FART -TIME LABOR
0
0
0
0
OVERTIME
0
0
0
0
0
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
0
0
0
0
0
BOX OFFICE SUPPLIES
200
0
788
200
(588)
OFFICE SUPPLIES
0
0
0
0
0
DSTAGE
0
Cl
0
0
0
SPEC DEPT SUPPLIES
300
0
0
300
300
HEAT /LIGHT /POWER
0
0
0
0
0
TELEPHONE
0
0
0
0
0
ADVERTISING; /PUBLICITY
0
0
0
0
0
VEHICLE GAS & OIL
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSIONS
0
0
0
0
0
FACILITY R& M
0
0
0
0
t]
VEHICLE R& M
0
0
0
0
0
SPEC. DEPT EQUIP R&M
0
0
0
0
0
OFFICE EQUIP R &M
0
0
0
0
0
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
10,000
1,C,11
11,505
10,000
(1,505)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
0
0
0
0
ARTIST FEES
0
0
0
0
0
PRODUCTION
0
12
12
0
(12)
FUNDRAISING
0
0
0
0
0
PROMOTIONS
0
- - - - --
0
-- - - - -
0
0
0
�TAL EXPENDITURES
--
$10,500
-- - - - - --
--
$1,623
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
$12,305
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
$10,500
-- - - - - --
($1,805)
:T PROFIT (LOSS)
$57,51)0
$9,632
$58,161
-- - - - - --
$57,500
-- - - - - --
($661)
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
CITY EVENTS DIVISION -DEPT. 6216
JUNE 1992
(OVER)
UNDER
91 -92
CURRENT
YEAR -TO-
12 MONTH
12 MONTH
BUDGET
MONTH
DATE
BUDGET
BUDGET
:VENUES:
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
ADMISSIONS
$12,000
$0
$0
$12,000
$12,000
FUNDRAISING
0
0
0
0
0
FACILITY RENTALS
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSIONS
1,100
0
0
1,100
1,100
INTEREST EARNED
0
0
0
0
0
MISCELLANEOUS
.0
-- - - - - --
0
-- - - - - --
0
0
0
iTAL REVENUES
$13,100
$0
-- - - - - --
$0
-- - - - - --
13,100
-- - - - - --
$13,100
PENDITURES:
SALARIES -FT EMPLOYEES
$0
$0
$0
$0
PART -TIME LABOR
0
0
0
0
0
OVERTIME
0
0
0
0
0
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
0
0
0
0
U
BOX OFFICE SUPPLIES
0
0
0
0
0
OFFICE SUPPLIES
0
0
0
0
0
POSTAGE
0
0
0
()
0
PEC DEPT SUPPLIES
550
(241)
0
550
550
NEAT /LIGHT /POWER
0
0
0
0
0
TELEPHONE
0
0
0
0
0
ADVERTISING /PUBLICITY
0
0
0
0
VEHICLE GAS OIL
0
0
0
0
0
0
CONCESSIONS
0
0
0
0
FACILITY R c:. M
0
0
0
0
0
0
VEHICLE R €< M
0
0
0
0
0
SPEC. DEPT EQUIP R &M
0
0
0
0
0
OFFICE EQUIP R&M
0
0
0
0
0
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
0
(2,363)
0
0
0
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
0
0
0
0
ARTIST FEES
0
0
0
0
0
PRODUCTION
0
0
0
0
0
FUNDRAISING
0
0
0
0
0
PROMOTIONS
0
-- - - - - --
(193)
-- - - - - --
0
0
0
TAL EXPENDITURES
$550
-- - - - - --
($3,597)
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
$0
-- - -
-- - - - - --
$550
-- - - - - --
$550
T PROFIT (LOSS)
$12,550
$3,597
- - --
$0
-- - - - - --
$12,550
-- - - - - --
$12,550
W. I
* I
W I
?f: I
'X. I
� I
.f QOa I
> -aw I
•X. F- I
h Z a I
>F 0Oa I
WWa} I
Z I
:K tC I
k Ul 1
:ft I
W I
C Y:aUO 1
0 WL-j O 1
'-I 1- =i I
I h'T- mI` - I
O sr 3 1
m h: 1
f- L- I
'L SI I
w u
1- Z >11 O I
2— * I
F- O * } I
Ul Z :41 a 0 1
W %+:WJO 1
W *.1- (C - I
O F- K 3 In I
U * - I
Z 0 +I L- I
.. E I
i
i+: 1
1 chM0 1
.K I
%K I
I
I
>fi I
I
>K I
I
N( F-
a I
a _ I
tL O `}t O I
CL 0.
w I- I
a0a a I
_ I
Z1- CNr1 U I
ocro W I
aam* o I
L- O ID * I
O * 1
cr -i I
> w >k I
NF- Z:k 1
U3L_* 1
tDOU wwo
I
1 N
ortjNo o mI,-- - - wonjtr'lt oNctiV tLUIO
I
I r�
q O
I
I
I ^II
I Ol II
NOMINWI I
I m
Or,- U) U]tD`7rf1U)U1<t•7O
OWNMM
1 O
m
1 7
1 Oil
LD LO (TI N M(0
1 tU
OITU) P- VN,�tM -tMQtm
MM - 'Itw
I TT
0Tt
I N
I CU II
N Co N Ql t,)J
I lD
0 - + N - lD N N 03 - +
r. U) V
1 V
-0
1 U)
I M 11
I', - "
I CV
-" V N (D
CA 07
107
N N
I N
I IT 11
O 0
1
4# U)
m
I-
-.0
I r0
1 — 11
Ul
I "
m
-p LL
I -
"
I "
I ift 11
o
LL CL U
Ia
I
-
I N
1 11
W
1 44
O
ai L
1 44
W at 7 a M all 0 aI 1.1 C -N 0 -N 0 0 C O
1 #c3
I If
- NU)tDOO
I
I N
OMWON - TONOOMWO -• 0000 -
I 7
'70
I CO
1 011
`t tD - m U7
I CO
0 In co O tD IfJ In O tki 117
In r- - IT
I N
CO 0
1 tD
1 (0 11
N NI' m -- CO
I M
O N V N r- N -1 '7 tD
`7 IN RI
I U)
r- N
i U)
I tD 11
44 " "
I "
" .. " " " "
v
"
"
ci omU1T- F- OLL.IUlr1lnWUaF -ZmU
m m
I It
In O N -+ N 't
ID to
1 0
U) rt
1 0
1 Ui I I
U7
I LO
tr# -• M IT
tD
I -t
m tD
I '4•
I N I I
N
C0
I tD
I IT II
I
00000010
OOOO0000OOOOOOOOOOOO10
I
orI0f011
1
I If
0000
1 0
000000000 0 0
O O O O 0 m
I m
0 0
1 m
I mil
0000
1 0
i
O If, WN000NN LID It
OOOOON
I U7
00
1 U)
I U7 II
00 0ID
I U)
CV mN L7 N-
mO- - IT) 17,
1 0
O0
1 O
I U) II
IT - C0
I N
nJ r.0 m T V
Qt tD -
1 O
- r.
I CO
1 m 11
N -
I (r)
tft UJ
I U)
--• CO
I V
I 44 11
44
I
I ##
1
I 4#
i
I II
I II
0-1 N0) In0LO
i
1
I U)
0-- M0LAJ 7U)OM00N -+-- 0CnU)00010
I
i
I I'-
N0
i
I
1 ,T
I II
I II
1 11
COU)NU) M
I r-
01TIMI-- .mrONUJ OJNOMMONV'm
I M
(n0
101
I Q, II
CryU7_r 7 M
I It
Otte- -N -pow 0 ONN—tCUm 0
1 111
(Q O
I W
I N I I
U)
1
0; Cn r` O -
m
I OD
m O
1 -
1 0 11
U) N 0') -
10)
N 11' V I-
- • m
I -r
IT N
I tD
I r- I I
N
I
tq UJ
�t
I
- r0
I -
I CO II
"
I
I ••
i "i
mil
N
I II
14f#
I
I Oft
I
1 11
I II
'I IT N -00
I
I
1 lD
LID 0`T0OJNU7O- 0M-- -00- 00CnOJ
I
i U)
1-0
I
1 CO
I II
i Ti 11
N CTI N 0) O
f f-
tL CO N 0 N CO U) O If)
I- LO Crn It
I CT)
QI C.
I CT)
I -+ I I
Ui U) m O Ul
I Ql
N - 07 tD N 07 N lip -+
l0 U) 0•t
I r-
0 U)
1 170
1 �t 11
44 " " -
1 -
" "" " ""
" _1
.
..
I
m Oj m
I Ui
-� '7 tD - N
N 0 N
I U)
-
N N
-•1
1 0
"11
1 0 11
0•I
I Cn
Cn
I 07
ITN
1 0
1 U) it
CO
I 07
I --• i t
I
I
I
i #t
I
I
I ift
I
I
I ## 11
I II
I II
0
m L
fl) 4J
-P •. C
C U 0
m L
� au
Ul E 0
41 0.-
a U +t
U
I I all
m •• C
•�UImUIC
.Jat..00
C•- U•.0
N4J L 4
W •0 at -+ N L
_I • -+ m E m N IL
Z ul c E c 0 -f
W at tU 0 W L 4
WaCLUaUO
D:
at
at
UI
m CTt
-
C
111 L
m0z
at
Cm
UI L Q
a
Q1 -C
C U a c IA Q[
W
a at
0 L C UI 0 +I at U
W a
[fl •.. a, 0 .-U C U •.,
rn
at +I VI U'I 3 • - 0 at N • - > Ul
C
C 17
at • � m -0 ai 0 -tJ C E .-. > L Cr, Ill
• �
0 C
3 LUWdi 0- a at 0a mLat C to
+J
-- 3
Ul
c m 3 at --, — Z a., .- '- -F, at m •- c _n
m
-p LL
In
at -a -0 — -C a L 0 ul -P 3 C In +1 In ro m
L
Ia
o
LL CL U
Ia
J
ID Ulw aE :34J Wa � Q W Ina -• m Q 0 )l+'
U m
W
a In tz a m In I D to C m C z_ tll W 7
O
ai L
Ul
W at 7 a M all 0 aI 1.1 C -N 0 -N 0 0 C O
L N
Z W
_
a E 01Un 4J CIn -- 7 0 a0 C.41 -- Q (1) -P
aC
W Z
tp D'- C ^Z a J 0 4J 0 U ID F- at U Ul - D -
m
at at
a O
+J F- F- •- N W L aj •- '0 ❑ E m III -+ - ai m
-F)
O CD
X U
0- I C U1A0 "a L14 •- 0- L N N N C1 4J
0
w Z
F- G -+j •- •- � -N N N (0 UI U -+ •- +' 4• > U •-
F-
ZLm1+0 •m- - 0)UN00) m7C0m111'0a
J
W m L4- 0 0- al 111 3 m m L CIE lT0 L L•- m m
2
ci omU1T- F- OLL.IUlr1lnWUaF -ZmU
F-
daF-
O
W
F-
� I
>f: I
:K00a I
a:W I
K CLr I
* i
k 1
>Y T- 1
k Z I
>I,0CL I
+ c O a I
F:WaW I
f.Za>- I
:+ 2 I
Ul 1
I
N W. I
Ol X I- I
I h: W I
C +:a'UO I
:•4rWC)O1
?_1N I
I 1:WMr- I
F w i
71i I
W 4
k i
W U +: I
I✓ Z
(I:
a: 0 1
w ww IC) I
W h:12N I
z_ } WUFl- I
`o f- ;+ Ln to I
U Z =+: — I
z t_i Y IL I
%f: I
>F: I
.k I
h, I
} CL 7 O I
?i, WF - O I
3 z nJ
k.WOf� i
i
>K
>K
a a * Z
(r- O >K O
a CL
F-
1-- z ch + a
a f
W — N >+: CC
Z1-M U
I2 to
oa'G>I< W
IL
IL O W K
O
'rW2%K
1-3Z>1
W — >K
U Ul IL k
^
Or- omoomm
I It
0-- "T 0IT0NOMlfltf)M000NOU
I —
GG
1 —
it
I r� II
O- OMMOOM
I W
O'gmmmw—o00'JtN 1
CoN
I In
Go
1 LO
1 OD II
MCnONCnO -0O
I m
ONwf,--M WU7MM —
0 I
I In
00
1 U)
I — 11
V Ul tD tP (r) lf) ui -
I OD
^ ^
Ui -T r, OD 'T N
('Q tD
I Ol
0
1 U) II
m I I
tD r + r- N —
I m
04 m --, m
m
I m
r- N
I m
I rn I I
- 0 - "t —
I CO
G
I -+
-t
I uD
I N 11
i II
I II
C m 3 -� •-� Z LY T 0) '.. In -- C T
M
4J LL
W
ai — -0 O- Q L Q W UI > 4) Ul Qi O)
L
N
—
I N
Cr)
I m
W Ul 7 +' to l<• UI — QI N 0 0 X -N
I m
111
44
I ift
I
O
a' L
I
W Qi m N 3 Qi 0 a 0 C 0 C O
I
I
^
0- MNNO1,-O
1
0 "tmroN0- 0 0 1f)M0000U)0
1 f,
OO
1 r�
^ II
I ID 'If
N In W O M G —
I On
O U7 -T COW •-• -+ U)
-•a
1 IT
00
1 `T
I U7 I I
TN0 — M M M
^
1 0
N CV
(D
1 0
GOO
I OD
I N 11
-•
—mm —NM
I -•
I V
^ ^
m
I
O
^
1,- CU
I
I M
I ^ I I
I U) II
I m
00
1 Ui
V
i m
I f- I i
I N
N
I N
I (r)
1 0 11
i #i
I
1
I
i
I
I i>:t
I
I
I I I
I II
I II
0000 1T000
i
I -t
O00000000OUDOOOOOO
I
1 LD
OO
I
1 0
I
^ II
1 N 11
OOOOCUOO
I t11
0000000 o0wo
0000
1 W
00
1 tD
I 'T 11
GOOONOO
I nJ
0000WRI T of -mo
OMM(ri
I ID
00
1 ul
I q 11
OU)GIllU-1ODO
i Pi
O In4— -t U)
MOi
i M
In0
1 0
1 N 11
0-0 OI ID ID
I -T
V tD N CD
LID
1 0
OD O7
1 f`-
I N 11
Cf1 r� - rti
1 1.0
4 t m
-+
I f-
In
I Cri
I r- 11
.. .
I ..
1 ^
I •.
I � II
>�
1 ift
I
I ift
i
1 i�3
I
1 II
I II
I
I
OminmNOtDO I Cn
-+ UD U) lD -•� v O1 1 CV
CU -+ Ci CU 1D G Ql I Cq
lnNUl- •+GCfJCO I �-+
r- NOD -»�IDm I rn
03 ID N r- I U)
I
I
0i-TIfiNC7immm l
O In N -+ -T OO m I -+
U)Nr- LO9)LDO 1 0
fq - - .. ..
. - - I
fu OD -t r�mnJN I r-
OD CU m 1 111
nJ I m
I sEt
i
I
1
1 T
I -4) UI
I C U L
I Qi L a
I E
I
Ul E C +'
I N 0D•- U
i a U +) • -
I QI @ L
I I I +) -N 4J
I N r+ IO 0 to
I
Ul to N+)U•-
I 4J (D •- ID to O
I C•- U•- 4-
I ai +) L 4) f0 0—
I WD Ill— E 0 L
I D .. N E 10 0 TO 01
I Z UI C E C C4)LL
I W Q1 Ql 0 Q( 0 •- U +)
I Da= aUaUlULn0
IW
I a:
1 I I it
I I I �• I I
or.-Moommoor-M,T000wo I -t --t LO 17r I In II
O r- -+ OJ 0 OD (r)
00 r- m
-•+ U) I ID
'T 0
1 0
1 N I I
OmO -tmnN
• -aCO0M
I Cn
Cnm
1 0',
1 W 11
O N Cn -+
nJ !n
1 Cr)
't T
i CO
I f` 11
m —
Cn
1 1.0
OD N
I N
1 m 11
t�
m
1 -T
V7
I
1 U) II
wa:
U, ... al 0 m E
cn
Qi +) Ul 3 L a L Ul > UI
C
I V
I u7
l U II
1 44
I
+�
1 *4
1
i II
I II
( I I II
�'�OCnr�- N07'T�,COOJNGOOm07O I �D �D�Yi I m I iU it
in r_n OD rn -. M — N CO
— r- IT I -7
T i m
1 nJ I — 11
CO CO — N CU — al
N nl 1 -T
T1
I co 1 (0 11
t4 _
I
.
I ^ 1 ^11
m
Ln I N
- OD
I -T I r.. II
U1
i Lf)
rt
1 O 1 (r) I I
-T
I -t
a U
I Ul I - II
Ti C 0)
I
1
I
X Q)
i I U II
I i II
I i 11
Ill
a cn
(z,
to L
a
C (o
a
a• s
a) 4J Ul
x
a U
Ti C 0)
W
X Q)
u L C L@ u
wa:
U, ... al 0 m E
cn
Qi +) Ul 3 L a L Ul > UI
C
C -0
LU• - a a a] 3 3Ua'E to
+�
3
Ln
C m 3 -� •-� Z LY T 0) '.. In -- C T
M
4J LL
W
ai — -0 O- Q L Q W UI > 4) Ul Qi O)
L
N
O
> @ W a- U a` Ui L --� 1D 7 a -•�
Qi
LO
W Ul 7 +' to l<• UI — QI N 0 0 X -N
a
U iD
W
a! to aZ Ul J_ -0 to L 4J --� M Ln C Z aI w �
O
a' L
ul
W Qi m N 3 Qi 0 a 0 C 0 C O
L al
Z W
_+ 11 E Cn+1•- Cln• -3 O) 0 0-P--0 M 4
CL
LJ
M J•- C a J 0 -N O 1- — U UI — JD —
M
O) N
a O
4J 1- 1- •- of 1 0 U M ID to H — 0) N
4j
O U
X U
0 H I CO ^(L •— 0) L N Qi QNO4J
0
W Z
I - 0 -N • -� -t-' Qf Ul • r -. U -, L .J 1+ > U . N
1--
H
ZLIO •it—QiU_aa)N_0C0M1AT0.
J
W M L CL Q, Ql D m 3 CL E 3 0 L L -- (1) m
2
UlT- hL)tLa LnLnLlUa1 -m:m6
LYa-1-
W
1•-
W.
Y0OCC
:kh.,T-
LYW
k
z
Oa
k E 0 CC
h:WCCw
;} ra}
Q
k. Ul
'X•
N k:
I `},WW
f:L'1(DQ
7 4; CC]O
i f:mDm
I f Ccmh-
F- C, } 2
CrJ 4, f!i
W
W
E %K
W f_7
F- u + W
UlZ 4c0 O
W >kT-J0
w i T
z h:CYUrl-
O}- :T- Ln
U z Ut --
z o r: LL
w:
X.
+: W
:LIO
+::L F- O
+: m m
%f•: CL
(t
>r:
k
y F- +:
a (I z
C O :+: O
aza 4:
O W :K F-
F-
a f -
WUN: 2
ZWLnAt U
2J \* Ln
O J O * w
(1 OCI D
U ` K
W LD �F
ow f
U -1 J Y:
D T-
F- U_ Z r<
�w-
Ua ILL *1
ODNOLD0
I G
0 -t GMr-
1 0 1
G II
r� CO CO -t
I I�t
4.4 r•- CO N
1 17 1
ift i I
M1.0Nf�
1 O
CO LD7
1 0 1
11
M cn 7 f-
I tD
O1 N Cn
I - 1
I tD I
II
I I
Q' 111
I tD
(- Qi
I iD I
i t
lrJ --�
I r•-
ui .-a
I r� 1
11
i
I I
it
Pi r•- Cri CD O
1-
G G 0 r- r`-
I IT I
Cn l I
LFJ f - L0 OJ
I tD
## N In f`-
I U7 I
Fil 11
nn. f^ M —
I W
CU
I r- 1
G 11
-
I I
- If
" (TI
I °'
O (0
1 CrJ I
N I I
I N
ii OD
I •T 1
N i l
N
I co
CU -
I "t I
(nJ II
I t
I
I ift 1
I 1
I I
## II
v it
II
OOGOO
1 0
0 0 0 0 'T
1 0 1
Oil
OGGG
I G
#t OD
## 11
O Ui O Ln
I O
I
If) U) 71
1 0 1
I I
Oit,Oin
I G
••
O NIII
I I
I G 1
II
I i
ID N
I f_n
91 m
1 M I
II
'D M
I rr
I'D nJ
1 tTi I
II
>..4
-•
I --
I
°-�
1 P. i
I I
i t
II
0 Wmril(0
I
1 G
WO:aGM
i i
I i
II
O i t
Ui It CrJ N O
I 'T
lZl Ui C OD O
I -t i
m i I
LO 0 91 f-
I Ui
Ln M C) M f`-
I iL I
Co 11
O O7 iL tD iD
1 Cn
G r- co
I CLi I
-t I I
Cn — IT ift IT
1 G
r} i CU
I Its I
CrJ I I
LID #i m to
I •--
OD RJ
I O 1
#1 I I
�
1 •�
I -• I
II
_"
N
-
I N I
II
I ##
i
14 I
I I
II
II
LD
NCnNNio
CU O1
CV
f0
I m
I +�
I E U
I W L
I •D Qi
I E
I N E
i N 0
I ff U
I
1 N
I IA f0 VI
I
4-' fD • ill
I C •. U
i UJ-N L+'
l W-0 N L
i D •- M E m fli
I Z IA C E CL
I W N N 0 QJ 4J
I D1111uaO
1w
I
v
J
C
Qi
G:
P
0
F-
U_
L1
v
IA LI 0
L fli N U
m IJI In C
�a, mm
fo U -- 0---
Ln fU X m
Ul > CWw
W Ut L 0
tY E UJ •-- +' L
O - Ln ril -0 at
I- f- IA QI '+
�- 1 - W G W
L C OU N
W ID 0 L N L
a0- UamF•-
X
W
Ln
w
m
Z
w
a
X
W
J
Q
F-
O
F-
11
Lfi II
M II
M II
N II
UJ Ii
L+3 I I
v 11
II
I I
lil
In
O
J
w
E
O
U
0 r-1 11 O Ui
I
I in
t
44 CV G O1 LO
1 07
O
r- Ui N
I O
cri
fil CO OD
I CU
LID
Ui oJ
I N
C'J
- N
1 `i
1 ?fi
v
J
C
Qi
G:
P
0
F-
U_
L1
v
IA LI 0
L fli N U
m IJI In C
�a, mm
fo U -- 0---
Ln fU X m
Ul > CWw
W Ut L 0
tY E UJ •-- +' L
O - Ln ril -0 at
I- f- IA QI '+
�- 1 - W G W
L C OU N
W ID 0 L N L
a0- UamF•-
X
W
Ln
w
m
Z
w
a
X
W
J
Q
F-
O
F-
11
Lfi II
M II
M II
N II
UJ Ii
L+3 I I
v 11
II
I I
lil
In
O
J
w
E
O
U
NOTE: 91 -92 Property Tax figures are Property Tax allocation figures (estimates by counties collected by the
Controllers Office); 1991-92 statewide actual revenues are not available yet. The data for New Cities and No
Property Tax Cities is not available. Redevelopment tax increment figures obtained from the Controllers Office.
I
PROPERTY TAX LOSS
REDEVELOPMENT LOSS
91 -92 Property
9% Property
90 -91 Total
Tax Increment
CITY
Tax Alloc.
Tax Loss
Tax Increment
Loss
SONOMA COUNTY
Cloverdale
$527,682
$47,491
$175,114
$27,966
Cotati
$309,874
$27,889
$640,183
$102,237
Healdsburg
$497,051
$44,735
$2,084,929
$332,963
Petaluma
$3,488,842
Y339'
$2,262,181
Rohnert Park
$2,160,523
'$194,44
$3,373,532
$538,753
Santa Rosa
$9,959,107
8 D
$1,462,030
$23314w�,
Sebastopol
$595,252
$53,573
$650,901
$103,949
Sonoma
$754,189
$67,877
$1,194,781
$190,807
Windsor
$0
$0
$0
STANISLAUS COUNTY
Ceres
$1,275,959
$114,836
$0
$0
Hughson
$94,522
$8,507
$0
$0
Modesto
$7,779,524
$700,157
$289,473
$46,229
Newman
$333,900
$30,051
$0
$0
Oakdale
$897,321
$80,759
$601,224
$96,015
Patterson
$366,256
$32,963
$0
$0
Riverbank
$644,019
$57,962
$0
$0
Turlock
$2,189,542
$197,059
$0
$0
Waterford
$129,372
$11,643
$0
$0
SUTTER COUNTY
Live Oak
$199,985
$17,999
$0
$0
Yuba City
$2,652,618
$238,736
$562,580
$89,844
TEHAMA COUNTY
Corning
$278,623
$25,076
$0
$0
Red Bluff
$874,909
$78,742
$0
$0
Tehama
$12,264
$1,104
$0
$0
TULARE COUNTY
Dinuba
$447,780
$40,300
$276,564
$44,167
Exeter
$342,443
$30,820
$0
$0
Farmersville
$111,108
$10,000
$68,230
$10,896
Lindsay
$306,882
$27,619
$187,781
$29,989
Porterville
$1,131,799
$101,862
$0
$0
Tulare
$1,706,899
$153,621
$940,285
$150,164
Visalia
$3,839,858
$345,587
$1,285,515
$205,297
Woodlake
$121,918
$10,973
$0
$0
TUOLUMNE COUNTY
Sonora
$322,274
$29,005
$0
$0
VENTURA COUNTY
Camarillo
$1,141,716
$102,754
$0
$0
Fillmore
$371,986
$33,479
$1,560,415
$249,198
Moorpark
$1,199,281
$107,935
$263,388
$42,063
Ojai
$698,090
$62,828
$469,295
$74,946
Oxnard
$12,113,290
$1,090,196
$3,682,238
$588,053
Port Hueneme
$892,022
$80,282
$2,414,199
$385,548
San Buenaventura
$10,242,730
$921,846
$783,438
$125,115
Santa Paula
$1,912,188
$172,097
$0
$0
Simi Valley
$1,618,501
$145,665
$5,614,371
$896,615
Thousand Oaks
$3,667,162
$330,045
$8,870,617
$1,416,638
POLO COUNTY
Davis
$4,564,211
$410,779
$940,438
$150,188
West Sacramento
$5,284,828
$475,635
$4,627,096
$738,947
Winters
$424,660
$38,219
$0
$0
Woodland
$4,924,585
$443,213
$292,657
$46,737
$0
YUBA COUNTY
S0
Marysville
$987,308
$88,858
$249,155
$39,790
Wheatland
$58,014
$5,221
$0
$0
TOTALS
$2,181,922,778
$196,373,050
$1,257,432,364
$200,811,949
NOTE: 91 -92 Property Tax figures are Property Tax allocation figures (estimates by counties collected by the
Controllers Office); 1991-92 statewide actual revenues are not available yet. The data for New Cities and No
Property Tax Cities is not available. Redevelopment tax increment figures obtained from the Controllers Office.
I
®■■MF
I■ ■t
„ IMMW
t t I■■E
-- ®■■R6
California Cities Work Together
r
League of California Cities
1400 K Street • Sacramento 95814 • (916) 444 -5790 1
city of 199
R081vor pgRlr
September 4, 1992
#32 -1992
BUDGET SIEGE ENDS EARLY IN THE MORNING ON SEPTEMBER 2,1992; CITIES, COUNTIES AND
SPECIAL DISTRICTS "CONTRIBUTE" $13 BILLION TO STATE BUDGET DEFICIT; THE MAIN BUDGET
BILL IS SIGNED BY THE GOVERNOR; SEVERAL BUDGET "TRAILER BILLS" REMAIN; DOES THE
NEXT BUDGET CRISES BEGIN WITH THE ADOPTION OF THE 1992 -93 BUDGET?
Early Tuesday morning the Legislature finally passed all of the budget related bills needed to place into effect the
1992 -93 state budget. The Governor signed the main budget bill immediately along with several essential budget
"trailer bills" -- a number of additional trailer bills are still under review.
In the final package, cities, counties and special districts were asked to take over $1.3 billion itt local tax dollars out
of community programs and give it to the state to help solve the state budget deficit. 77ie final figures for cuts to
local government are as follows:
Local Governments L Cuts
Counties $525 million
Cities $200 million
Special Districts $375 million:
Redevelopment Agencies $205 million
While the budget deficit battle itself was ugly and difficult for all involved the impact of the budget "on the streets"
of our communities will be even more devastating. 77tere is one fact which is crystal clear in this process --the state
cannot, even if it wanted to, micro - manage local governments. It is incapable of accurately reading the needs of
the community and the subtleties of delivering local services. Cuts of this magnitude do not have support among
local citizens. Will this undeniable fact sink in with legislative candidates when they nun for election this fall?
As you will note in our summary of the budget as it impacts cities, there are certain issues which need the immediate
attention of city officials. We are asking that you contact the Governor's office and ask fora veto or signature on
the appropriate bill. 71iis request is also being made for any non - budget proposals which were sent to the Governor's
desk during the last weeks of the legislative session.
City officials, once again, perforated above and beyond the call when responding to requests to contact Legislators
about a particular legislative proposal. This is especially true during the "end" of the budget process when it gets
considerably more difficult to track a particular proposal as it switches back and forth among several budget- related
vehicles. You made a difference in a very difficult budget year!
In conclusion, perhaps the most telling statement in all of this was made by a Legislator during the final budget
debate. To paraphrase, "the next budget crises begins with the adoption of the 1992 -93 budget." This is primarily
a reference to the one -time fires contained in the budget that will not be available new year to help close the
expected gap. It also raises a question about the state of the economy. Will there be enough of a recovery to ease
the budget pressures; or, are we looking at another 64 day staleniate? Only time can tell.
***************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES
1. INFORMATION City Losses From State Budget. SB 617 and SB 844 (No Designated
Authors). Budget "Trailer Bills" Take Local Government Revenues
To Balance The State Budget. Cities Lose Revenue From Property
Tax, Ciearette Tax. Trailer Coach In -Lieu Fees and Redeveionment.
SB 617 and SB 844 are the budget "trailer bills" that implement state budget actions to take over $1.3 billion from
local government (cities, counties, special districts, and redevelopment agencies). SB 617 was passed first and
SB 844 is a follow -up bill that changes provisions of SB 617 based on last minute negotiations (primarily
regarding redevelopment and special districts) to finally resolve differences between the Senate and the Assembly
on the local government package. As of the publication of this Legislative Bulletin, the Governor had not signed
either of these trailer bills, however, it is expected that he will be signing them soon. Together, these bills
contain the losses to cities resulting from state budget adoption. The following summarizes the provisions of
these bills that affect cities:
September 4, 1992
PROPERTY TAX
Approximately $1.1 billion in property tax revenues are shifted permanently from the tax base of cities, counties
and special districts to schools. This shift reduces the state funding for schools by the same amount. The losses
for each local government are $200 million to cities; $525 to counties; and $375 to special districts (city- governed
special districts are excluded).
For cities, the amount of property tax deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year (1991 -92) for every city will be
reduce by 9 %. In other words each city's property tax revenue in 1992 -93 will be reduced by an amount equal
to 9% of the property tax revenue they were allocated in 1991 -92. The county auditor will make this calculation
for each city in that county. Attached to this Bulletin is a preliminary estimate of the loss for each city. Please
note: these are only estimates, and are based upon information provided by the State Controller; the actual
amounts will be determined by the auditor of each county.
Five charter cities (Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, San Diego, and San Francisco) are authorized to utilize
some of their ports' "discretionary revenue" for reimbursement of municipal services provided to their ports, not
to exceed a cap of $4.0 million.
Until 1997 -98, the amount of property tax revenue shifted from any city or county will be reduced if that city or
county that has been "materially and substantially impacted" as a result of a federally declared disaster between
October 1, 1989 and the effective date of SB 844. To qualify, at least 20 percent of the cities, or cities and
unincorporated areas of the county representing 20 percent of the population within the county must have
suffered substantial damage, as certified by the Director of the Office of Emergency Services. The amount of
reduction in property tax losses are apportioned as a per- capita share of a $15.0 million capped amount. That
is -- qualifying disaster cities would have their property tax losses reduced by a per capita amount determined
by dividing $15.0 million by the population of all qualifying cities and counties. The State's Director of Finance
is required to determine this amount by October 1, 1992.
In addition, another $100 million in property tax is taken from cities and counties as a one -time per - capita
reduction in 1992 -93 that is a "roundabout" approach shifting $40 million from cities ($1.65 per capita) and $60
million from counties ($1.92 per capita). These amounts are to be offset by increasing Vehicle License Fee
revenues to cities and counties by a like amount (accomplished by reducing Department of Motor Vehicles'
administration charges against the VLF Fund).
REDEVELOPMENT
In addition to the general property tax reduction in SB 617, redevelopment agencies received a one -time cut of
$205 million. The provisions enacting this cut are contained in SB 844 which modifies the provisions relating to
redevelopment agencies found in SB 617. This cut will occur in the following manner:
1. The $205 million figure is approximately 16 percent of the total tax increment apportioned to cities
in the 1990 -91 fiscal year - the base year in law for calculating the loss. The 16 percent is then
multiplied by the redevelopment agency's 1990 -91 tax increment to calculate the dollar loss to each
agency. By October 1, 1992, the Director of the Department of Finance shall notify each agency and
each legislative body of the affected (city or county) of the amount determined to be the agency's share
of the payment.
2. In shifting the funds, a redevelopment agency can borrow up to 50 percent of the low and moderate
income housing set -aside funds, unless executed contracts exist that would be impaired if the agency
reduced the amount allocated to the Low and Moderate - Income Housing Fund. Any set -aside funds
used must be repaid by the year 2003.
4 September 4, 1992
3. This is a one -time shift, occurring only during the 1992 -93 fiscal year.
4. The payment of the agency's share of the $205 million must be made prior to May 10, 1993. It must
be paid to the county auditor who in turn will deposit the payment into the newly created Educational
Revenue Augmentation Fund created pursuant to Section 97.03 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
The Director of the Department of Finance shall also notify each county auditor of the amounts each
city in his or her county must pay into the Fund.
5. An agency may use any funds that are legally available and not legally obligated for other uses,
including, but not limited to, reserve funds, proceeds of land sales, proceeds of bonds or other
indebtedness, lease revenues, interest, and other earned income. No moneys in the low- and moderate -
income fund as of July 1, 1992, may be used for this purpose.
6. The obligations created by this new law, i.e., the payment to the Educational Revenue Augmentation
Fund, are declared to be an indebtedness of the redevelopment project to which they relate.
7. An agency may allocate less than the amount of the necessary payment, if the agency and the
legislative governing body have adopted a resolution by December 31, 1992 which is certified by the
agency's chief fiscal officer, listing the indebtedness of the agency. The resolution must certify and
demonstrate that the agency is unable to make the necessary payment.
8. If an agency is unable to allocate the full amount of the payment, the agency shall enter into an
agreement with the legislative body (of the affected city or county) by February 15, 1993, to fund the
payment of the difference between the full amount required by the payment and the amount available
for allocation by the agency. The agreement between the agency and the legislative body shall be
subject to the terms and conditions specified in a written agreement.
9. If the redevelopment agency fails to transmit the full amount of funds required for the payment by
May 15, 1993, the county auditor shall transfer any amount necessary to meet the payment from the
legislative body's property tax allocation.
Attached to this Bulletin is an estimate of the Tax increment loss in 1992 -93 based upon 1990 -91 tax increment
data provided by the state Controller, which includes "cash pass- throughs" as reported to the Controller by
redevelopment agencies. These are only estimates since the actual amounts will be determined by the state's
Department of Finance by Ocober 1, 1992.
TRAILER COACH /MOBILEHOME VEHICLE LICENSE FEES
Existing law provides that mobilehomes sold prior to July 1, 1980, are subject to Vehicle License Fees (VLF);
mobilehomes sold after that date are subject to the local property tax. Unlike the VLF on motor vehicles, the
mobilehome VLF is not guaranteed as a local government revenue by the California Constitution. The
Department of Motor Vehicles allocates the mobilehome VLF back.to the county where the mobilehome is
located for distribution by the county auditor to cities, counties, community college districts, and school districts.
Cities receive one -third of the mobilehome VLF for each mobilehome located in each city. In 1989 -90, the total
mobilehome VLF revenue to cities statewide was approximately $1.3 million.
SB 617 shifts all trailer coach and mobilehome VLF revenues to the state that would otherwise be received by
cities, counties, school districts and community colleges. The total local government revenue loss is $27 million,
of which cities will lose approximately $1.3 million.
September 4, 1992
CIGARETTE TAX
All of the remaining cigarette tax revenue currently received by cities is shifted to the state's General Fund (last
year 47% of city cigarette tax was shifted to the state). This represents a loss of approximately $25 million to
cities statewide. In addition, SB 617 specifically prohibits any local taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products,
thereby preempting cities from levying a local tax.
EXTENSION OF DEADLINES FOR ASSESSMENTS FEES AND CHARGES
SB 617 includes a provision that is intended to allow cities and other local agencies flexibility in enacting fees,
assessments and charges to replace lost property tax revenues. Otherwise the deadlines for such actions has
generally passed and the opportunities for such actions would have been lost.
SB 617 provides that, "notwithstanding any other provision of law, for the 1992 -93 fiscal year only, October 1,
1992, or any other date mutually agreed upon by the county auditor and the county, any city within the county,
or any special district, shall be the deadline for enactment of, or the conduct of a hearing or the receipt of data
with respect to, any assessment, fee, or charge levied or increased by the county, that city or special district,
pursuant to any existing authorization, for the sole purpose of replacing amounts of property tax revenues lost
as a result of an act of the Legislature enacted during the 1991 -92 Regular Session.. This subdivision shall only
apply to the receipt of data that is to be submitted to the county tax collector for the purposes of collecting a
new or increased assessment, fee, or charge pursuant to property tax bills issued for the 1992 -93 fiscal years."
PERS. CONTRIBUTION RATE
The overall budget bill contains language which permits PERS contracting agencies to use the rates calculated
by PERS for 1992 -93. These rates are substantially lower then the 1991 -92 rates, which would have to remain
in effect without this language.
2. NEUTRAL League Removes Opposition to Brown Act Bills SB 1538 (Kopp),
and AB 3476 (Burton).
After marathon negotiations and two conference committee hearings, the League has removed its opposition to
SB 1538. Both AB 3476 and SB 1538 are conformed to contain identical language. The outpouring of City
opposition to the bills as introduced allowed the League to keep up the pressure and obtain significant
amendments to both bills. We appreciate the many letters that were written on these bills. We also appreciate
the efforts made by cities to have Senator Calderon appointed to the Conference Committee. As a former City
Attorney, Senator Calderon understands the complexities of the Brown Act and was an advocate for reason in
the Conference Committee.
City Attorneys throughout California participated in reviewing the various bills and recommending amendments.
Their efforts have resulted in a bill which we believe can be implemented by local agencies. City Attorneys Mike
Jenkins, Betsy Strauss, Leland Dolley and Michael Dean attended numerous hearings and meetings at the
Legislature. We also thank the City Attorney's Legislative Committee Brown Act Subcommittee and the many
other City Attorneys who gave generously of their time and expertise.
A number of amendments have been made to the bills in response to our criticisms. In addition, the authors
offered language to correct the Roberts v. Palmdale case. The main issues of concern which were raised
throughout the negotiations have been amended as follows.
6 September 4, 1992
tP A
a � �
:3 w
Z rn w
004 rn m
0+ Ch
w r♦
0
H
H
V
N
m
Cr
r1
a)
m
m
A
w
m
V
O
Of
t~
$
a
a
h
44
W
H
b
0
$4
4 4
0
1
04
O
ta
•r1
a)
V
0
w
x
a
aa))
>a
H
O
C
H
W
a.
0
14
m
m
N
�
a
�
,4
-14 N
>
w
0
a
a
0
w
v
4 a
�
U
04
4)
0
.
O
b1 !
m
.SC
04
0
m
v
a
o+
M
ro
H
H
ro
M
`c
•q
0
0
aa))
a
w
•A
1
cmd
4J
4)
b
w
r.
>
W
m
O
0
15
.N
4
4)
rt
U
14
N
w
w
w
w
0
31
04
$
m
i
a)
41
41
a)
E
U
$
N
--
E
9
a
a
i
E1
�
V)
W
H
W
U
Z
0
O�
U
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
1 0
N
O
O
O
M I
U1
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
'0 1
t/!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I O
1 0
r-
0
0
0
0
0 I
O
O
O
O
0
h
d
O
1 O
1 0
N
O
O
O
O I
M
N
O
N
t0
0
i N
4-)
W I
I
,
Ln
O
.
O
,
H
N
.
O
.
d'
.
O
I .
1 4
I .
1 d
.
00
.
%0
O
.
U1
I
N i
.
U1
.
0�
.
M
.
O
,
,
d'
I .
1 M
0
1
O
W
0m
N
r1
I M
1 M
h
H
O
h
M 1
M
w
N
0
w
w
I h
ri
h
10
111
M
M
ri
1 01
1 0�
N
N
H
H
N 1
0
01
%r
k0
M
U)
1 O
14
$4
N
d'
H
ri
H
N
10
N
N
U
i
ri
I ri
1
ri
ri
QI
t7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
1 0
N
O
O
O
O I
N
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
i
Vl.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
1 0
h
0
0
0
0 1
r-
N
h
M
h
M
I N
1
O
O
O
O
0
h
H
O
1 h
1 h
N
O
O
O
O 1
00
I
U1
O
O
ri
N
O
Uf
O
I d
1 d
00
%0
O
U1
00 1
r1
U)
N
O
w
o
I M
a)
a)
1
O
t0
cv
cl,
W
0
M
H
1 Iq
1 d
h
ri
O
h
N I
h
d'
N
01
00
r-1
I W
0
M
h
%0
M
M
V
H
I N
1 N
N
N
ri
H
d 1
v
O
d
w
M
w
1 M
.0 1
1
I .
1
.
.
.
..
I .
0
0 I
i
N
d'
ri
r♦
ri
M
LO
N
N
H Ln
a
ri
1h
I H
1/i
I
ri
1h
_
Ul.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
1 0
N
O
O
O
O I
N
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
1
to
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
1 0
h
0
0
i
h
N
r-
M
h
M
I N
1~
.O
O
O
O
O
o
h
O
I
O
O
l h
N
O
O
O
0
d
N
N
N
I 00
0
I
a)
.
I
I
w
4J I
i
.
U1
.
O
,
O
.
ri
.
N
O
UI
0
1 e
00
O
1 W
00
k0
O
I
O
U)
N
O
k0
a%
I M
m
1
O
w
v
d'
w
0
M
H
1 %r
N
M
1 00
h
ri
O
(
tb
11
N
0
O
H
I w
i
.n I
M
h
t.0
M
M
g
H
I N
:0
9-1
1 v
N
N
H
1
O
O
v
w
.
M
w
I M
I
d
I
I
.
N
d
.
ri
.
H
ri
I .
1 N
—
—
I .
1 ri
I
I
.
N
.
M
.
%0
N
N
1 U)
0 1
I H
Ul.
I H
t1T
1
ri
t/f
1 ri
1/t
N
J
C7
N
m
Cr
r1
a)
A
w
m
V
O
Of
t~
$
a
a
h
44
W
H
b
0
$4
04
U`�'
ta
•r1
a)
0
w
x
a
aa))
>a
H
O
a
C
H
W
a.
0
14
m
m
N
�
a
�
,4
-14 N
>
w
0
a
a
0
w
v
m
�
04
4)
0
w
w
w
m
04
0
m
v
a
o+
M
ro
H
H
ro
M
`c
•q
0
I(d
aa))
a
w
(OA
EI
cmd
cd
4)
b
w
r.
W
v1 >,
O
m
15
.N
4
rt
N
w
w
w
w
$
W
a)
a)
41
a)
E
U
L7
a
E1
0
W
H
W
U
Z
U
w
al U
>
14 V
m +4
W�
m �s
a a
0 0
N H 0
43 $4
fdw
Ul 44
� O a
0 41 0
IO � W 4.)
$4 H
H H
ra
4J
0
4J
1
a
r1
w
m
4J
O
Of
t~
$
a
a
s~
44
H
b
0
-4
U`�'
ta
•r1
o N>
w
x
a
aa))
>a
H
O
C
H
a)
a)
0
W
m
N
�
a
�
,4
-14 N
>
w
0
a
a
0
w
0
0
0
0
w
w
w
w
m
04
a
v
a
o+
M
ro
H
H
ro
M
.7
•q
of
U
(OA
(d
cmd
v
4)
A
S
15
N
w
w
w
w
ra
4J
0
4J
1
a
r1
O
Of
0
W
H
b
ta
14
o N>
w
x
a
H
O
C
H
cq
3
W
m
�
,4
-14 N
w
0
a
a
w 0
ra
4J
0
4J
1
a
I
1i
4
A
U
x
O
O
41
4)
(d
to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O to t, O O O O m M
O M r•I d' m In w N r•t
.-I H
>+
O
O
O
O
1 0
I Ln
q
O
d'
%O
O
O
1 N
1 00 11
m
r♦
trl
O
1 0)
1 M 11
w
rq
O
N
Ln
I t-
I d' II
In
OA
0
v
1 t.
1 m It
�
v
to It
o
I M
I II
!V
I ri
I II
a
v
k i(
O
O
O
O
1 0
1 N II
N N r 01%
O
O
O
O
I N
1 Ln 11
r-I ON d H
d'
W
O
O
1 co
i ri 1'
O O to M
H
r
Ln
O
I 0
( N 11
H N r•I M
H
O
N
to
I to
I til- 11
H 00 00 N
0%
%0
d'
1 d
I 11
0 M N ( )
t M
I it
H
x
1 r-I
1 II
0
ur
.•.
.•
I
1 .•. it
a
$4
I
�
O
O
00
1 00 11
r-1
to
O
1
I o)
t tb 11
II II II
11 1-1 14
H
O
N
to
I io
I 00 II
(d A A
v
1 M
I rI II
N N N
Oi O% pi
ri ri ri
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O to t, O O O O m M
O M r•I d' m In w N r•t
.-I H
W
ss
O
rl
a
O
'd
b
a
O
U
a
$4
m
w
�
U
a
�
O
44
W
m
W
x
0
a
$4
0
x
w
4J
Em
�
O
o
o
EI
m
m
44)1
:3
.•
m
v1
tT
w
(d
0
14
to
an
0
+t
W
O
a
4J
a
W
'Cf
rA
to
$,t
$4
11
w
a
-4
a.)
O
O
H
t7f
I
O
to
-A
>i
>
r+
m
b�40
0(
oc
V
)
W
c
(d�
w
(d
1
W
tr
4)
4)
-4
w
(d
(d
ra
r 1
W
♦
M
0%
w
b
m
0
0
x
a
U
Ir
+)
w
w
O
E
M
w
to
0
U
U
-A
O
O
Of
a
a
41
W
N
t)
$4
a
w
•r+
a
(d
V
0
10
0
o
U
0%
to
w
a
.�
>(
m
04
0
a
a
$4
N
P4
�'
cd
b
U
w
b
$4
1.1
.r
4J
IT
>
>
q
0
(d
0
U
0
v
0
(d
0
0
4)
4)
4)
W
q
1t
$4
•04
'�
r4
43
s
4
IX
o4
•rl
w
w
+►
I
m
(d
0
$4
0
a
•rI
4)
•.I
w
w
In
to
v
m
m
•rt
w
to
-4
0
43
(d
(d
>
a
tr
3
to
U
14
C4
q
a)
w
10
•a
to
4-)
a
a
r 1
6
(d
(d
a
0
0
w
14
a
w
od
O
4)
11
U
-4
0
0
0
w
. f
m
w
41
$4
4)
w
0+
4J
m
H
H
u
�
m
a
U
m
to
0
a
a)
m
H
A
O
a
14
$4
H
m
(d
q
• 4
. 4
E
0
w
'Ci
'Cf
'CS
>
O
O
0
O
(n
E
•rt
4)
RC
-1
b
r-I
0
`
94
>
�
w
m
U
o+
a+
of
a
0
$4
14
u
€I
a
W
0
ra
w
w
N
w
w
w
w
O
w
w
w
(d
(d
(d
0
N
>
m>
0%
0)
4J
0
.0
-4
Q
0
4J
4J
a
4
-P
w
a
$4
$4
�
m
(d
(d
m
(d
(d
ro
U
U
U
�
q
w
w
w
to
w
0
a
a
a
w
w
a
a
a
•
a
O
0
a
Of
m
O
w
•rI
E
•a
E
-A
a
U
a
U
a
•rt
e
•rI
a
4
E
a
(�
•r+
w
w
w
14
SH7
WwwE(
n
o
0
Falwww99www
W
ss
O
rl
a
O
'd
b
a
O
U
a
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
1992 -93 Budget
RESERVES
Reserve for Dev. of Addit.
Recreational Facilities
Total Special Reserves
TOTAL ALL RESERVES
382,092
$1,175,368
$2,786,380
$96,266
($78,734)
382,092
$1,271,634
-------- - - - - --
$2,707,646
Motes:
(1) An amount equal to approximately 10% of medical insurance premiums
(2)Yearly principal payment from CDA for Theatre (P.A.C.) Loan 11
(original amount $4,500,000, bal. 6/30/93= $3,600,000) ;$300k due;not
(3)Yearly principal payment from CDA for Theatre (P.A.C.) Loan #2
(original amount $450,000, bal. 6/30/93= $390,000);$30,000 due;not pd
(4)Yearly principal payment from CDA for Theatre (P.A.C.) Loan #3
(original amount $510,000, bal. 6/30/93 = $442,000);$34,000 due;not pd
(5)Proposed Transfer to General Fund (if needed)
(6)P.E.R.S. surplus funds
`7)Payment of promotional fees to So. Co. Wineries Association
P.A.C.= Performing Arts Center
CDA = Community Development Agency of the City of Rohnert Park
-13-
7/1/92
Additions
6/30/93
Balance
(Deletions)
Balance
general Fund Reserve
$1,611,012
(175,000)
(5)
$1,436,012
Ipecial Reserves:
Capital Improvements and
Infrastructure Maintenance
0
0
Wine Center /Tourist Facility
111,676
(45,000)
(7)
66,676
Self Insured Losses:
Property & Liability
23,000
23,000
Worker's Compensation
258,547
258,547
Retired Employee Medical Ins.
168,000
50,000
(1)
541,319
323,319
(6)
Miscellaneous Reserve
0
(2)
;From CDA Theatre (P.A.C.)Pmts)
232,053
(232,0530)
(3)
0
0
(4)
Reserve for Dev. of Addit.
Recreational Facilities
Total Special Reserves
TOTAL ALL RESERVES
382,092
$1,175,368
$2,786,380
$96,266
($78,734)
382,092
$1,271,634
-------- - - - - --
$2,707,646
Motes:
(1) An amount equal to approximately 10% of medical insurance premiums
(2)Yearly principal payment from CDA for Theatre (P.A.C.) Loan 11
(original amount $4,500,000, bal. 6/30/93= $3,600,000) ;$300k due;not
(3)Yearly principal payment from CDA for Theatre (P.A.C.) Loan #2
(original amount $450,000, bal. 6/30/93= $390,000);$30,000 due;not pd
(4)Yearly principal payment from CDA for Theatre (P.A.C.) Loan #3
(original amount $510,000, bal. 6/30/93 = $442,000);$34,000 due;not pd
(5)Proposed Transfer to General Fund (if needed)
(6)P.E.R.S. surplus funds
`7)Payment of promotional fees to So. Co. Wineries Association
P.A.C.= Performing Arts Center
CDA = Community Development Agency of the City of Rohnert Park
-13-
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
1992 -93 Budget
1992 -93 Expenditures Compared to 1991 -92
1991 -92 1992 -93 $ INCREASE
TEGORY /DEPT. BUDGET BUDGET (DECREASE)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
City Council
City Manager
Finance & Accounting
Data Processing
Stores
Legal Services
Planning Dept. & Comm.
Personnel
Rent Appeals Board
Internal Audit
City Office Building
City office Annex
General Gov't -Non Dept.
Non -Dept. Benefits
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC SAFETY
Public Safety Personnel
Police Protection
Fire Protection -
Animal Control & Shelter
Public Safety Bldg. Central
Public Safety Bldg. Main
Public Safety Bldg. North
Public Safety Bldg. South
Civil Preparedness /Haz Mat
Youth & Family Services
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY
PUBLIC WORKS
City Engineer
Inspection
General
Maint. of Trees/ Parkways
Maintenance of Streets
Street Lighting
Traffic Signals
Storm Drains & Drainage
Weed Abatement
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
$58,845
$61,820
$2,975
333,675
360,155
26,480
685,925
736,850
50,925
137,740
130,015
(7,725)
71,575
66,485
(5,090)
36,400
61,400
25,000
162,625
200,510
37,885
170,945
175,235
4,290
30,800
30,800
0
89,655
97,060
7,405
42,000
.48,000
6,000
18,000
17,000
(1,000)
1,073,275
937,410
(135,865)
79,400
66,550
(12,850)
$2,990,860 $2,989,290 ($1,570)
$4,866,905
$5,230,535
$363,630
497,550
481,050
(16,500)
110,500
103,280
(7,220)
83,860
89,780
5,920
48,000
12,000
(36,000)
0
100,000
100,000
26,900
17,600
(9,300)
17,500
5,000
(12,500)
18,200
15,750
(2,450)
345,600
368,075
22,475
$6,015,015 $6,423,070 $408,055
----- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- ---- - - - - --
$301,950
277,635
1,534,580
161,400
130,000
204,000
65,000
5,210
3,200
$316,810
268,415
1,590,695
144,700
71,700
219,700
69,800
5,210
3,200
$14,860
(9,220)
56,115
(16,700)
(58,300)
15,700
4,800
0
0
$2,682,975 $2,690,230 $7,255
------ - - - - -- ------------------------
=VI:
%
CHANGE
5.06%
7.94%
7.42%
(5.61 %)
(7.11 %)
68.68%
23.30%
2.51%
0.00%
8.26%
14.29%
(5.56 %)
(12.66 %)
(16.18 %)
(0.05 %)
7.47%
(3.32 %)
(6.53 %)
7.06%
(75.00 %)
(34.57 %)
(71.43 %)
(13.46 %)
6.50%
6.78%
4.92%
(3.32 %)
3.66%
(10.35 %)
(44.85 %)
7.70%
7.38%
0.00%
0.00%
0.27%
-19-
1991 -92
1992 -93
$ INCREASE
%
ATEGORY /DEPT.
BUDGET
BUDGET
(DECREASE)
CHANGE
,ARKS & RECREATION
?ark Maintenance
$433,500
$473,715
$40,215
9.28%
Alicia Park
35,700
26,400
(9,300)
(26.05 %)
Benecia Park
20,900
19,600
(1,300)
(6.22 %)
Caterpillar Park
6,500
6,000
(500)
(7.69 %)
Colegio Park Area
23,700
18,500
(5,200)
(21.94 %)
Dorotea Park
18,000
19,700
1,700
9.44%
Eagle Park
30,900
22,000
(8,900)
(28.80 %)
Golis Park
32,400
30,600
(1,800)
(5.56 %)
Honeybee Park
14,300
13,550
(750)
(5.24 %)
Ladybug Park Area
15,500
14,600
(900)
(5.81 %)
Sunrise Park
41,900
32,400
(9,500)
(22.67 %)
"M" Park
8,300
27,900
19,600
236.14%
Roberts Lake Park
17,200
15,000
(2,200)
(12.79 %)
Rainbow Park
12,600
10,800
(1,800)
(14.29 %)
Recreation Commission
3,850
3,350
(500)
(12.99 %)
Recreation Admin.
367,765
393,965
26,200
7.12%
Contract Classes
63,000
631000
0
0.00%
- Recreation Programs
178,100
204,825
26,725
15.01%
Senior Citizen Center
129,465
131,450
1,985
1.53%
Senior Citizen Mini -Bus
19,500
5,500
(14,000)
(71.79 %)
R.P. Community Stadium
48,100
44,500
(3,600)
(7.48 %)
Alicia Pool
42,750
42,650
(100)
(0.23 %)
Benecia Pool
46,500
44,550
(1,950)
(4.19 %)
Ladybug Pool
31,900
29,400
(2,500)
(7.84 %)
Honeybee Pool
65,800
89,400
23,600
35.87%
Sports Center
304,870
321,065
16,195
5.31%
Comm. Center Compl. Gr.
22,100
27,000
4,900
22.17%
R.P. Community Center
87,350
93,300
5,950
6.81%
Burton Ave .Rec. Center
22,800
20,700
(2,100)
(9.21 %)
YMCA /Soccer Building
1,000
1,000
0
0.00%
Ladybug Rec. Bldg.
11,500
11,450
(50)
(0.43 %)
Scout Hut
400
400
0
0.00%
School Grounds Maint.
110,000
127,400
17,400
15.82%
-- - - - - --
DOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION
------ - - - - --
$2,268,150
------ - - - - --
-----------------------
$2,385,670
-----------------------
$117,520
5.18%
-- - - - - --
)THER
Golf Course General
$3,000
$3,000
$0
0.00%
Cultural Arts
10,000
10,000
0
0.00%
Performing Arts Center
642,775
443,810
(198,965)
(30.95 %)
Library
3,500
2,800
(700)
(20.00 %)
Youth Advisory Comm.
350
350
0
0.00%
Booking Fees /County
115,000
70,000
(45,000)
(39.13 %)
Prop Tax Admin Fee /County
40,000
40,000
0
0.00%
Sexual Assault Examinations
0
15,000
15,000
- --
)TAL OTHER
$814,625
$584,960
($229,665)
(28.19 %)
TOTAL ALL DEPARTMENTS -
$14,771,625
$15,073,220
$301,595.
2.04%
-19-
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
1992 -93 Budget
Community Promotion Detail
1900 -6710
-52-
Amount
Amount
Amount
Item Description
Requested
Proposed
Approved
City's Annual Report
$0
$0
$20,000
City's Newletters
2,000
2,000
2,000
Maps and Miscellaneous Printing
1,000
1,000
1,000
Sister Cities Relations Committee
2,000
2,000
2,000
RP Wine /Tourist Center (net of ground lease) 45,000
45,000
0
(Refer to page 52.1 for details)
RP Chamber of Commerce
39,500
39,500
39,500
So. Co. Visitor & Convention Bureau
125,480
0
0
Cultural Arts Council of Sonoma County
3,000
2,000
2,000
Young Woman of the Year
5,000
5,000
51000
RP Founders Days Committee
7,000
5,000
5,000
Rancho Cotate Awards Program
250
250
250
Various sports teams
8,000
4,000
4,000
Sonoma County Tennis Open (incl in above
- $500)
Social /Human Service Programs
Inter -Faith Shelter Network
6,000
TBD
6,000
Family Education Center
2,000
2,000
2,000
YWCA Battered Women Shelter
5,000
5,000
5,000
Family Services Agency
0
3,500
3,500
So. Co. Assoc. for Youth Dev.
15,000
5,000
0
California Parenting Institute
500
0
0
Other
Christmas Toy Distribution Program
500
500
500
SSU Athletic Association
1,500
TBD
1,500
Guanella Brothers Softball Team
10,000
TBD
71500
Wine Country Film Festival
500
TBD
500
TO BE DETERMINED
17,250
6,750
Total
$279,230
$139,000
$114,000
-52-
ti
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
1992 -93 CASH FLOW STATEMENT
General Low & Moderate
Fund Housing Fund
ash Balance, July 1, 1992
Low & Moderate Income Housing Fund $2,235,077
Improvement Project Fund $137,140 0
Bond Proceeds Fund 586,185 0
Interest earned cash 72,779 0
Cash from tax increment 503,625 0
1991 COP cash 2,451,008 0
NTICIPATED SOURCES OF CASH
Property Tax Increment
2,400,000
0
20% set -aside
(274,000)
274,000
Interest from investments
40,000
80,000
Interest from loan repayments
0
30,000
State grant (CHRP -O)
0
20,000
'MCC application fee
0
20,000
!otal Anticipated Sources of Cash
$5,916,737
$2,659,077
STICIPATED USES OF CASH
Contractual services:
County Rehab program administration
$0
$53,000
ACC program administration
0
27,000
Innovative Housing administration
0
23,500
Interfaith Shelter Network grant
0
6,000
Homeless Prevention Group grant
0
5,000
Administration fee -City general fund (see note)
325,000
20,000
Trustee fees /bond issues
8,000
0
County property tax admin fee
50,000
0
Fund Rehab loans
0
540,000
Fund NEH loans
0
250,000
Fund Innovative Housing loan
0
26,000
Fund Tower Apartments (Burbank) loan
0
300,000
GF loan interest payaments
358,720
0
Theatre land lease payment
20,000
0
Capital project expenditures (see attached)
2,653,701
0
Debt service pmts /1991 TARBS
1,560,270
0
Debt service pmts /1991 COPS
402,293
0
Payment to State
538,753
----- - - - - --
0
----- - - - - --
Cotal Anticipated Uses of Cash
$5,916,737
----- - - - - --
$1,250,500
----- - - - - --
:ash Balance, June 30, 1993, Estimated
$0
$1,408,577
!Tote:
Total amount due to City will be $631,500 from this fund.
Only $325,000 will be available for repayment in 1992 -93.
The balance will accrue and be repaid as CDA funds become available
... F.. a.....e •.cnrc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE
CITY OF ROHNERT PARR
1992 -93 CASH FLOW STATEMENT
93CASHDE.XLS
Total
Projects
Increment
General Fund
ash Balance, July 1, 1992
Improvement Project Fund
$137,140
$0
$137,140
Bond Proceeds Fund
586,185
0
586,185
Interest earned cash
39,815
32,964
72,779
Cash from tax increment
0
503,625
503,625
1991 COP cash
2,451,008
2,451,008
NTICIPATED SOURCES OF CASH
Property Tax Increment
0
2,400,000
2,400,000
20% set -aside
0
(274,000)
(274,000)
Interest from investments
0
----- - - - - --
40,000
----- - - - - --
40,000
----- - - - - --
otal Anticipated Sources of Cash
3,214,148
----- - - - - --
2,702,589
----- - - - - --
$5,916,737
----- - - - - --
,XICIPATED USES OF CASH
Contractual services:
Administration fee -City general fund
0
325,000
325,000
Trustee fees /bond issues
0
8,000
8,000
County property tax admin fee
0
50,000
50,000
GF loan interest payaments
0
358,720
358,720
Theatre land lease payment
0
20,000
20,000
Capital project expenditures (see attached)
2,653,701
0
2,653,701
Debt service pmts /1991 TARBS
0
1,560,270
1,560,270
Debt service pmts /1991 COPS
21,694
380,599
402,293
Payment to State
538,753
----- - - - - --
0
----- - - - - --
538,753
----- - - - - --
Dotal Anticipated Uses of Cash
3,214,148
----- - - - - --
2,702,589
----- - - - - --
$5,916,737
----- - - - - --
rash Balance, June 30, 1993, Estimated
0
0
$0
93CASHDE.XLS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK
REDEVELOPMENT FUND
1992 -93 BUDGET
Estimated Project Expenditures:
Public Safety Building (Main) $1,000,000
Alicia Park Lights 60,000
Public Safety West /Animal Shelter 1,000,000
RP Expressway (Interim project - overpass) 1,019,701
Commerce Blvd. Bike Path 161,000
Total $3,240,701
Recommended option:
Reduction in Animal Shelter /State budget crisis (587,000)
Total Project Expenditures $2,653,701
93PROJ.XLS