Loading...
2025/01/28 City Council Agenda Packet,-p HN ERT Pq Rk 19 "'~ sz "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow. " �AL1 FO Rl31 P� ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL, ROHNERT PARK FINANCING AUTHORITY (RPFA), SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION JOINT REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, January 28, 2025 Open Session: 5:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBER 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The Rohnert Park City Council welcomes your attendance, interest and participation at its regular meetings scheduled on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Members of the public are encouraged to observe the meeting on Cable Channel 26, by visiting meeting central on our website https://www.rpcity.org/city_hall/city_council/meeting_central, or at our YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/CityofRohnertPark. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Provides an opportunity for public comment on items not listed on the agenda, or on agenda items if unable to comment at the scheduled time (limited to three minutes per appearance with a maximum allowance of 30 minutes allotted per comment period, with time limits subject to modification by the City Council in accordance with the adopted City Council Protocols). Please fill out a speaker card prior to speaking. Members of the public may also provide advanced comments by email at publiccomment@rpcity.org Comments are requested by 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting, but can be emailed until the close of the Agenda Item for which the comment is submitted. Email comments must identify the Agenda Item Number in the subject line of the email. The emails will not be read for the record but will be provided to Council. Please note that all a -mails sent to the City Council are considered to be public records and subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act. City Council/RPFA agendas and minutes may be viewed at the City's website: www.rpcity.org. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Council/RPFA may discuss and/or take action on any or all of the items listed on this agenda. If you challenge decisions of the City Council or the Rohnert Park Financing Authority of the City of Rohnert Park in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearing(s) described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Rohnert Park at, or prior to the public hearing(s). RIGHT TO APPEAL: Judicial review of any city administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5 may be had only if a petition is filed with the court no later than the deadlines specified in Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, which generally limits the time within which the decision may be challenged to the 90th day following the date that the decision becomes final. SIMULTANEOUS MEETING COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE (Government Code Section 54952.3): Members of the City Council receive no additional compensation as a result of convening this joint meeting of the City Council and the Rohnert Park Financing Authority. CITY COUNCIL GOALS: On May 14, 2024, the Rohnert Park City Council adopted the following multi -year broad goals (listed below in no particular order): 1. Long Term Financial Sustainability 3. Planning and Infrastructure 2. Community Quality of Life 4. Organization Well Being THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK WANTS TO CONNECT WITH YOU! Our cross -departmental communications team works together on media relations, social media, internal and external communications, stakeholder relations, the City's website, branding, media, and communications support to the City as a whole. Please visit rpcity.org/i_want_to/connect to stay connected and informed. 1. CITY COUNCIL/RPFA/SUCCESSOR AGENCY JOINT REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL (Elward Rodriguez Sanborn Giudice Adams 2. READING OF THE LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT The City of Rohnert Park acknowledges Indigenous Peoples as the traditional stewards of the land. Let it be acknowledged that the City of Rohnert Park is located within the traditional homelands of the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, comprised of Coast Miwok and Southern Pomo peoples. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. PRESENTATIONS 4.A Mayor's Proclamation: Proclaiming February 2025 as Black History Month in the City of Rohnert Park Item 4.A. 4.13 FY 2024-25 Budget Implementation and Project Update from Sonoma Water Assistant General Manager Brad Sherwood and Director of Engineering Kent Gylfe Item 4.13. PowerPoint Presentation 5. SSU STUDENT REPORT 5.A By AJ Franklin, Legislative Representative, Sonoma State University Associated Students, Inc. (SSU ASI) 6. DEPARTMENT HEAD BRIEFINGS 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item or on City business not listed on the Agenda may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes. Those wishing to address the Council should refer to Page I for information on how to submit public comments. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the Consent Calendar will be considered together by one or more action(s) of the City Council and/or the Rohnert Park Financing Authority and Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission, whichever is applicable, unless any Council Member or anyone else interested in a consent calendar item has a question about the item. Council Motion/Vote: (Elward Rodriguez Sanborn Giudice Adams 8.A Acceptance of Reports from Finance Department (This is not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)) Item 8.A.1 .City Bills/Demands for Payment dated December 31, 2024 through January 13, 2025 Item 8.A.2. Successor Agency Monthly Cash Report for November 2024 Item 8.A.3. City Monthly Cash Report for November 2024 8.13 Acceptance of Council Second Quarterly Expense Report FY24/25 (October, November and December 2024) (This is not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)) Item 8.13. 8.0 Approval of Minutes for City Council/RPFA/Successor Agency Joint Regular Meeting January 14, 2025 (This is not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)) Item 8.C. 8.13 Waive Second Reading of and Adopting Ordinance No. 986, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park Amending Chapters 1.16 (General Penalty), 1.24 (Nuisance Abatement), 1.25 (Administrative Citation Program), 1.26 (Administrative Hearings) and 1.27 (Collection Procedures) and adding a new Chapter 1.23 (Nuisance Defined) within Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code to Streamline the Administrative Citation and Nuisance Abatement Processes and Increasing Fines for Short -Term Rental Violations (Exempt Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15378) Item 8.D. 8.E Receive Progress Report on the Status of the Emergency Public Safety Antenna and Radio System Replacement Project (CIP2412), as required by the Public Contract Code and by Minute Order, Authorize the continuation of Resolution 2024-051 until the Emergency Action is Completed (This is not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)) Item 8.E. 8.F Adopt Resolution 2025-006 Approving the Measure H Funding Agreement Between the County of Sonoma and the City of Rohnert Park and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Same (This is not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)) Item 8.F. 9. REGULAR ITEMS 9.A Receive an Informational Presentation Regarding the City's Tree Inventory and Resource Analysis Report by Davey Resource Group (This is not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)) A. Staff Report B. Public Comments C. Council Discussion Item 9.A. Staff Report and Attachments Item 9.A. Presentation 9.13 Receive Informational Update on Capital Improvements Program (CIP); Discuss and Direct Staff on Planned FY 25-30 Projects; and Adopt a Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2024-25 (FY 2024-25) CIP Budget to Appropriate $1,003,000 from Public Facilities Fee Fund (Fund 4250) for Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements (CIP2201) Increase the Project Budget for CIP2201 from $2,400,000 to $3,403,000 (Exempt Under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines §§15306) A. Staff Report B. Public Comments C. Resolution for Adoption: Resolution 2025-007 Amending the Fiscal Year 2024-25 (FY 2024-25) CIP Budget to Appropriate $1,003,000 from Public Facilities Fee Fund (Fund 4250) for Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements (CIP2201) Increase the Project Budget for CIP2201 from $2,400,000 to $3,403,000 D. Council Motion/Roll Call Vote (Adams Elward Rodriguez Sanborn Giudice ) Item 9.13. Staff Report and Attachments Item 9.13. Presentation - Revised 1-28-2025 10. COMMITTEE / LIAISON / OTHER REPORTS This time is set aside to allow Council members serving on Council committees or on regional boards, commissions or committees to present a verbal report on the activities of the respective boards, commissions or committees on which they serve. Per Government Code Section 53232.3(d), Councilmembers shall provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the City. No action may be taken. 10.A City Standing Committees, Council Liaison Assignments, Outside Agency and Mayors & Councilmembers/City Selection Committee Appointments: 1. Elward 1. Homeless Coalition Board (1/22) 2. Rodriguez 1. Chamber Of Commerce Board of Directors (1/21) 3. Sanborn Zero Waste Sonoma (1/16) 2. Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Sustainability Agency (1/16) 4. Giudice 1. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District Building and Operating Committee, Finance -Auditing Committee & Governmental Affairs and Public Information Committee (1/23) 2. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District Board of Directors (1 /24) 5. Adams 1. 6. Reports Under Government Code Section 53232.3(d): o Rohnert Park Public Safety Officers Association (RPPSOA) Annual Crab Feed (1/25) All Attending 11. COMMUNICATIONS Copies of communications have been provided to Council for review prior to this meeting. Council Members desiring to read or discuss any communication may do so at this time. No action may be taken except to place a particular item on a future agenda for Council consideration. I LA Mayor's Report Regarding Rotary Peace Conference 2025 on January 24-26, 2025 12. ADDING AGENDA ITEMS TO A FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA At this time, any Councilmember may request the City Manager or Designee to add an item to a future agenda. Pursuant to the City Council Protocols, a concurrence of two Councilmembers is needed for the City Manager to consider the request. In accordance with the Brown Act, Councilmembers may only discuss whether the item should be placed on a subsequent agenda for deliberation and action. The City Manager will be responsible for placement of requested items on the agenda after evaluation of all requests for, among other things, time -sensitivity, and number of items already agendized. 13. PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item or on City business not listed on the Agenda may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes. Those wishing to address the Council should refer to Page I for information on how to submit public comments. 14. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: Time shown for any particular matter on the agenda is an estimate only. Matters may be considered earlier or later than the time indicated depending on the pace at which the meeting proceeds. If you wish to speak on an item under discussion by the Council which appears on this agenda, please refer to page 1 for more details on submitting a public comment. Any item raised by a member of the public which is not on the agenda and may require Council action shall be automatically referred to staff for investigation and disposition which may include placing on a future agenda. If the item is deemed to be an emergency or the need to take action arose after posting of the agenda within the meaning of Government Code Section 54954.2(b), Council is entitled to discuss the matter to determine if it is an emergency item under said Government Code and may take action thereon. AGENDA REPORTS & DOCUMENTS: A paper copy of all staff reports and documents subject to disclosure that relate to each item of business referred to on the agenda are available for public inspection at City Hall, 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California 94928. Electronic copies of all staff reports and documents subject to disclosure that relate to each item of business referred to on the agenda are available for public inspection on https://www.rpcity.org/city_hall/city_council/meeting_central. Any writings or documents subject to disclosure that are provided to all, or a majority of all, of the members of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda has been distributed will be made available for inspection at City Hall and on our website at the same time. Any writings or documents subject to disclosure that are provided to the City Council during the meeting will be made available for public inspection during meeting and on our website following the meeting. AMERICAN DISABILITY ACT ACCOMMODATION: Any member of the public who needs accommodations should email the ADA Coordinator at jcannon@rpcity.org or by calling 707-588-2221. Notification at least 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the ADA Coordinator to use her best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety in accordance with the City procedure for resolving reasonable accommodation requests. Information about reasonable accommodations is available on the City website at https://www.rpcity.org/city_hall/departments/human resources/a d a and accessibility resources . CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA 1, Sylvia Lopez Cuevas, City Clerk, for the City of Rohnert Park, declare that the foregoing agenda was posted and available for review on January 23, 2025, at Rohnert Park City Hall, 130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, California 94928. The agenda is also available on the City web site at www.rpcity.org. Executed this 23 day of January, 2025 at Rohnert Park, California. Sylvia Lopez Cuevas Office of the City Clerk ¢OYINER'f PARp, 2 prodamatt"011 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Proclaim FEBRUARY 2025 AS BLACK HISTORY MONTH IN THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Vbereag, Black History Month is celebrated every February in recognition of achievements by Black Americans and all people of African descent in the United States; and IVberea.5, Dr. Carter G. Woodson established the observance of Black History Week in 1926 to reveal and honor the contributions, achievements, and involvement of African Americans in the development of our nation; and Vberea.5, the observance of Black History Month seeks to emphasize the countless contributions made by African Americans in all aspects of our nation's fabric, including but not limited to, Education, Government, Civil Rights, History, Law, Science, Literature, Medicine, Music, and the Arts; and Vbereao, we honor and recognize the many contributions made by African Americans and African American Organizations. It is an opportunity to pay tribute to the numerous heroes of African American history who have inspired creativity and innovation for future generations. Black History Month also serves as a reminder of the importance of teaching the history of those who came before us; and 30berea.5, for generations, African Americans have courageously led the ongoing efforts to promote justice, fairness, and unity reminding us that while challenges persist, the collective power of diverse voices will continue to drive positive change for generations to come; and R)bereag, local Black residents and business owners have strengthened, enriched, and contributed to the economic development of the City of Rohnert Park. Their resilience, creativity, and commitment to progress have made Rohnert Park a more inclusive and vibrant place for all who call it home; and Vbereao, this Black History Month let us draw inspiration and courage from the heroes who came before us, as we continue the work toward full equality and representation. Qutu, Tljerefore, be it Pruclatmeb that I, Gerard Giudice, as Mayor and on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim February 2025 as Black History Month in the City of Rohnert Park. We value and recognize the contributions of our local black heroes in both Sonoma County and Rohnert Park. I encourage all of you to observe, recognize, and celebrate African Americans' culture, heritage, and contributions to our country, state, and city. Mulp aub 3 egularlp Prottatmeb this 28th day of January 2025. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Gerard Giudice, MAYOR Sonoma Water Clean. Reliable. Essential. Every Day. Water Transmission System Projects Rohnert Park City Council Meeting January 28, 2025 Kent Gylfe Director of Engineering kent.gylfe@scwa.ca.gov O © 0 ® sonomawater.org Personal Comments of Presenting Agency Lake Mendocino �� `• LAKE 'A. (D --_ _-_-_-_-_-_-\-\ MENDOCINO SONOMA Lake Sonoma _ Pacific Ocean v► River/Creek Wohler-Mirabel O Water Supply Facilities ���'��■ Aqueduct Water Agency Service Area County Boundaries Groundwater �. NAPA Windsor '•_Santa Rosa SONOMA MARIN )hnert Park .Cotati mp House To Aqueduct Turbine Pumps Lateral Intake Pipes Valley of the Moon Sonoma ;Petaluma f� �_i Novato an Pablo Bay Capital Improvement Projects 0&M Projects Planning Efforts Personal Comments of Presenting Agency 3 Occidental Rd Well #3 Drilling and Activation • Drilling project completed in April 2024 • Topside design delayed due to well development - advertised December 2024 • Substantial completion in October 2025 • Plan, permit, test and implement recharge components internally (2026) Santa Rosa Plain Wells Drought Resiliency Project awarded $6.9M State Drought Relief Grant Personal Comments of Presenting Agency I Sebastopol Rd Well Activation • Design completed and project advertised in Nov 2023 • Construction in progress with underground nearly complete • Electrical equipt. delivery anticipated Feb 2025 • Well conditioning and cycling Spring/Summer 2025 • ASR pilot study through Oct 2025 4 � Y C \ � LaC+fit InFlexT" Flow Control Valve (FCVT") US Pat..N 6,316,6al and 6,273,195 Personal Comments of Presenting Agency 5 Kastania Tank Recoat • Project Goals • Recoat interior/exterior of tank • Replace cathodic protection • Seismic analysis/retrofits • Modifications to tank appurtenances • Completed and back in service September 2024 • Fun fact - Kastania tank required roughly 6,850 gallons of paint to recoat - enough to paint an average 1500 ft2 home 250 times Personal Comments of Presenting Agency 6 i 4 E Kix TYPICAL FOOTING EXPANSION DETAIL sz t-in. = r-o- Santa Rosa/Cotati Aqueduct Cathodic Protection • Project split in 2 phases based on ease of R/W and permitting • Phase 1 • 11 total rectifier/anode well sites • 11 CP stations • Phase 2 — • 20 total rectifier/anode well sites • 39 CP stations • Significant coordination with PG&E • Phase 1 design progressing with target advertise Mar 2025 • Phase 2 design to follow with target construction 2026 4') 50 ARV 9 4 6` bo-nG �1 I 1 . f 4.ec• 1 o la 4S, Staa 320-52 s7P -Oct f C' :. C 76 :. .. ,. 5iA 41J6 .. _Ar,�'-y7 ,Fy,F... \ �801. +2ti ARV 4 ARV 6" ." P ., R�Rtifier soe #8 Sta 3('� - 787.05 ARV 6" er SIte 4145la 071 +40T. 4c...1 G S [,: U9 :![a S 2 ® - Renfier Site #13 Sta. 761+00 r;rl+J ,-'+oc fNecttie'Site#12Sta 713.80 _ y �' -. N [ • S l0 tl10 S[a. 6G?, P!) I It y' The rectifier drives corrosion cur. "simulate" the ano corroding. I,I oil 4. Personal Comments of Presenting Agency 8 Wilfred Booster Electrical Upgrade • Project includes • Replace electrical switchgear building and components • Add 2nd pump set and piping for reliability/resiliency • Capable of pumping north and south • Electrical switchgear prepurchase in June 2024 • Advertise scheduled for May 2025 Personal Comments of Presenting Agency 9 Designs in Progress • Bennett Valley Fault Crossing • Seismic resiliency pipeline project • 30% design complete with target advertise Summer 2025 • Treatment Modernization Upgrades • Preliminary feasibility completed Oct 2024 • Multi -phase, multi -year project with Phase 1 design kicking off • Wohler Demuth • Emergency storage facility • Design kicked off with target advertise Summer 2026 • Kawana-Ralphine-SBS Pipeline - Ph 1 • In process of finalizing scope with consultant for phase 1 design, environmental, and right- of-way • Next phase will utilize recent easement acquisition through Southeast Greenway Dam fill Tilted Older Fluvial ` � fleposits � ' Personal Comments of Presenting Agency 10 Tank Washout Inspections, Visual Inspections, and Condition Assessments • Washout Inspections • Ralphine 1, 2, 3 & 4 • Eldridge 1 • Sonoma 1&2 • Annadel 1 & 2 • Kawana 1 • Cotati 2 (in progress) • Kawana 2 (FY 25/26) • Eldridge 2 (FY 25/26) Personal Comments of Presenting Agency 10 - Year Water Storage Tank Maintenance Agreement FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24125 FY 25t26 FY 26127 FY 27/28 FY 29129"' T<<<!cs Irispecte€! 15 13 17 16 10 1a 16 Tanks drained & Cleaned 5 4 2 2 0 5 5 Coating Repairs (Internal & External) 3 6 2 2 0 0 0 Minor Structural Repairs 3 6 2 1 0 0 0 Cathodic Protection Upgrades 2 11 1 2 0 0 0 Regulatory & Safety U pSrides 6 2 2 0 0 0 E: cost = $1,146,900 $1,598,150 $1,429,457 $1,400,548 $340,348 $695,680 $515,681 12 Personal Comments of Presenting Agency WIND OR �r C olle cto r N o. 6 i,- CollectorNo.1 Collector No. 2 \ - Cellectnr No.3 CdIYCr ip�i•NO.S r r� Collector No. b �.. Forestvi Ile Booster •- yk4'- �- I''"•-.--,rr`"r'�, Fultan Meter Still • Occidental Rd Well , �6rN SANTA RASA Kawana Springs Boaster SEBASTOPOL _ Mine and Meter Sta Y Sonoma Booster No.1 Sebastopol Rd Well i" -- Sonoma Booster Not 3GlAt R. tH 54 Hea m Ave Meter Sta '�pygr ` Todd Rd Well. � 1•.y f� Kawana 5pYlnyS Los Guilmo, M3 @ HWL ' "•" 380 GMi � 3.P raG annedet e ti Yi ssler ��"7",'NERT PARE( f 11-•- _. - q� Dunbar Meter Ste cotnti •err-e Eldridge L1i/� 4aM .q MG 'Virq 422.5 N HW L a-1 MG Eldridge Booster k Ely Meter St,, >•R "I Ely Booster ly k• VALLEY OF THE MOON LEGEND WATER z DISTRICT SYSTEM COMPONENTS y CdlxMr we�i Q Booster Station �.. PETALUMA ' ■ 9oraee FacS'ty -y. 'I Sonoma • Pmtluceon Yib1 Corral Meter L' McNear Meter Stay -' "� - r8a'51, H L L--� .ry�rry+ NSONOMA � Ilnactivel - SCALE 3 5.3co 13 X3 Kastalnia `Kastanla Meter su 23000 --. 'Sw ESri HERE. Gerrm ht@rngP,�aan� Fart 12 mG /GBOH44a IGN, KatlaSAer NL, 01q npg S•' sbPP,m enSiradMap �M�" -' _ e�i�i1►�l��Il��lj DDW Sanitary Survey Inspection • Comprehensive Sanitary Survey Inspection conducted on September 24th & 25th • Attended by 10 DDW Staff members • Staff inspected Sonoma Water Operations Room, SCADA System, all six collector wells, disinfection and corrosion control facilities, all 18 storage tanks, Todd Road Well and two booster pump stations. • Deficiency findings: replace chlorine solution rotometer in Collector 6, minor rust and graffiti on five tanks, increase security on tank sites • No findings on: pumps, system management and operation, monitoring and reporting, operator compliance with state requirements U 4 Qe�ce 14 Personal Comments of Presenting Agency Sonoma Water Questions? O © 0 sonomawater.org 15 Personal Comments of Presenting Agency Item 8AI CITY BILLS/DEMANDS FOR PAYMENT January 28, 2025 Check Number: 600012633 - 600012868 Dated: December 31, 2024 - January 13, 2025 1.757,117,29 TOTAL $1, 757,117, 29 CITY BILLS DEMANDS FOR PAYMENT DATED DECEMBER 312024 THROUGH JANUARY 13 2025 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012633 12/31/2024 AD -VANTAGE MARKETING INC General Fund Postage & Shipping 498.00 600012633 12/31/2024 AD -VANTAGE MARKETING INC General Fund Communication Advertising 1,172.93 600012634 12/31/2024 HAROLD A. STEUBER INC Sewer Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 198.15 600012635 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 62.07 600012636 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 63.63 600012637 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 32.59 600012638 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 31.03 600012639 12/31/2024 AT&T Water Utility Fund Communication -Phone 64.32 600012640 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 32.64 600012641 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 94.75 600012642 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 46.21 600012643 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 63.69 600012644 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 63.69 600012645 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 391.89 600012646 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 63.69 600012647 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 156.89 600012648 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 60.30 600012649 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 63.69 600012650 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 92.50 600012651 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 32.62 600012652 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 1,459.87 600012653 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 312.26 600012654 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 93.19 600012655 12/31/2024 AT&T General Fund Communication -Phone 187.95 600012656 12/31/2024 BITWARDEN INC Information Technology ISF Software -Security 720.00 600012657 12/31/2024 BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION General Fund Deposits -Developer 83.45 600012657 12/31/2024 BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (83.45) 600012657 12/31/2024 BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 83.45 600012658 12/31/2024 BRELIE & RACE LABORATORIES INC Water Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 42.00 600012659 12/31/2024 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 634.40 600012659 12/31/2024 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 2,353.52 600012659 12/31/2024 BURKE WILLIAMS & 50RENSEN LLP CIP Government Capital Projects 766.48 600012660 12/31/2024 CALMAT CO Water Utility Fund Other Exp-Repair System 557.01 600012661 12/31/2024 CLUBCARE INC Sports Ctr Capitl Faciliy R5ry Repair & Maintenance 910.00 600012662 12/31/2024 COAR DESIGN GROUP CIP Government Non -Capital Projects 454.00 600012663 12/31/2024 COMCAST General Fund Communication -Phone 206.75 600012664 12/31/2024 COMCAST General Fund Communication -Phone 143.75 600012665 12/31/2024 COMCAST General Fund Communication -Phone 176.27 600012666 12/31/2024 COMCAST General Fund Contract -Outside Services 235.11 600012667 12/31/2024 COMCAST General Fund Communication -Phone 105.23 Page 1 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012668 12/31/2024 COMCAST General Fund Communication -Phone 16.36 600012669 12/31/2024 CSG CONSULTANTS INC General Fund Deposits -Developer 300.00 600012669 12/31/2024 CSG CONSULTANTS INC General Fund Deposits -Developer 700.00 600012669 12/31/2024 CSG CONSULTANTS INC General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (300.00) 600012669 12/31/2024 CSG CONSULTANTS INC General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (700.00) 600012669 12/31/2024 CSG CONSULTANTS INC General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 300.00 600012669 12/31/2024 CSG CONSULTANTS INC General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 700.00 600012670 12/31/2024 DEPT OF JUSTICE General Fund Recruitment 132.00 600012670 12/31/2024 DEPT OF JUSTICE General Fund Recruitment 32.00 600012670 12/31/2024 DEPT OF JUSTICE General Fund Recruitment 32.00 600012670 12/31/2024 DEPT OF JUSTICE General Fund Recruitment 192.00 600012670 12/31/2024 DEPT OF JUSTICE CIP Government Capital Projects 256.00 600012671 12/31/2024 DO POLYGRAPH INC General Fund Recruitment 500.00 600012.672 12/31/2024 DRAFTECH BLUEPRINTING INC CIP Government Capital Projects 5.50 600012673 12/31/2024 MICHAEL RUBIN Measure M Parks Other Exp-Special Events 68.99 600012674 12/31/2024 FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 175.75 600012675 12/31/2024 GHD INC CIP Government Capital Projects 2,032.20 600012676 12/31/2024 GRACE REID General fund Contract -Outside Services 595.00 600012677 12/31/2024 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS CIP Government Capital Projects 2,635.00 600012678 12/31/2024 HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPL Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 449.21 600012679 12/31/2024 HILDA TRABOULSI General fund Contract -Outside Services 600.00 600012690 12/31/2024 KBA DOC SOLUTIONS Information Technology ISF Contract -Outside Services 582.00 600012681 12/31/2024 MORRIS DISTRIBUTING Rohnert Park Foundation Other Exps-Concessions 695.90 600012681 12/31/2024 MORRIS DISTRIBUTING Rohnert Park Foundation Other Exps-Concessions 6.96 600012682 12/31/2024 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 752,60 600012682 12/31/2024 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 923.24 600012682 12/31/2024 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 1,223.47 600012682 12/31/2024 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Fuel 651.02 600012682 12/31/2024 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Fuel 1,009.65 600012682 12/31/2024 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Fuel 741.55 600012683 12/31/2024 JORDAN ODEN Water Utility Fund Travel and Training 138.86 600012684 12/31/2024 Lyn Cramer General Fund Othr Accrued Liab.-PrkRec Rfnd 80.48 600012685 12/31/2024 PETERSON MECHANICAL INC Facilities Internal Service Retention Payable 494.75 600012686 12/31/2024 REXEL USA INC Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 58.88 600012687 12/31/2024 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD CIP Government Capital Projects 727.00 600012688 12/31/2024 STOMMEL INC General Fund Othr Accrued Liab.-Sales Tax 0.06 600012688 12/31/2024 STOMMEL INC General Fund Capital Asset -Vehicles (0.06) 600012688 12/31/2024 STOMMEL INC General Fund Capital Asset -Vehicles 19,098.93 600012689 12/31/2024 TEAM GHILOTTI INC CIP Government Capital Projects 74,350.40 600012689 12/31/2024 TEAM GHILOTTI INC CIP Government Capital Projects 19,459.88 600012689 12/31/2024 TEAM GHILOTTI INC CIP Sewer Capital Projects 128,710.68 600012689 12/31/2024 TEAM GHILOTTI INC CIP Water Capital Projects 300,111.74 600012690 12/31/2024 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC CIP Government Non -Capital Projects 2,826.00 600012691 12/31/2024 TRIAD CONSULTING & SYSTEM DE5IGN GROUP CIP Government Capital Projects 522.50 600012692 12/31/2024 UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICAN INC Water Utility Fund Rental -Equipment 749.06 600012692 12/31/2024 UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICAN INC Water Utility Fund Rental -Equipment 216.81 600012692 12/31/2024 UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICAN INC Water Utility Fund Rental -Equipment 169.07 Page 2 of 13 CHECK NUMBER 600012692 600012693 600012694 600012695 600012695 600012696 600012697 600012698 600012699 600012699 600012699 600012699 600012699 600012699 600012699 600012699 600012699 600012699 600012699 600012700 600012701 600012702 600012703 600012703 600012703 600012703 600012704 600012705 600012706 600012706 600012707 600012707 600012707 600012707 600012708 600012708 600012708 600012708 600012708 600012708 600012708 600012708 600012708 600012708 600012708 600012708 600012708 CHECK DATE 12/31/2024 12/31/2024 12/31/2024 12/31/2024 12/31/2024 12/31/2024 12/31/2024 12/31/2024 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 O1/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 01/03/2025 VENDOR NAME UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICAN INC HD SUPPLY INC VESTIS GROUP INC WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANSPORTATION INC WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANSPORTATION INC WHEELER ZAMARONI WRA INC WYATT IRRIGATION CO KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC KBA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC HAROLD A. STEUBER INC 8 & L GLASS COMPANY ELLIS FLOORING INC EUREKA OXYGEN CO EUREKA OXYGEN CO EUREKA OXYGEN CO EUREKA OXYGEN CO FASTENAL FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC GRAINGER INC FUND Water Utility Fund Water Utility Fund Fleet Services iSF CIP Government CIP Government Water Utility Fund CIP Government Water Utility Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service CIP Government Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service General Fund General Fund Fleet Services ISF Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service Facilities Internal Service ACCOUNT Repair & Maintenance Repair & Maintenance Uniform Laundry Capital Projects Capital Projects Other Exp-Repair System Capital Projects Repair & Maintenance Lease -Equipment Lease -Equipment Lease -Equipment Lease -Equipment Lease -Equipment Lease -Equipment Lease -Equipment Lease -Equipment Lease -Equipment Lease -Equipment Lease -Equipment Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Non -Capital Projects Special Dept Expense Special Dept Expense Special Dept Expense Special Dept Expense Supplies -Janitorial Svs Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Maintenance -Janitorial Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Special Dept Expense Special Dept Expense Special Dept Expense Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Mai ntenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty Repair & Maintenance-Fclty AMOUNT 351.20 66.24 31.73 971,75 390.00 560.64 472.00 83.22 755.55 1,144, 84 40.81 2,423.42 2,004,35 399.19 263.71 399.19 495.52 399.19 399.19 131.95 1,075.00 1,296.19 290.15 290.15 290.15 290.15 710.99 302.12 520.00 726.25 49,68 19.86 9.96 4.21 253.28 74.76 52.37 (1,851.58) 8.63 173.97 441.55 520.92 1.94 2.82 39.23 45.62 340.40 Page 3 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012708 01/03/2025 GRAINGER INC Sewer Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 273.17 600012708 01/03/2025 GRAINGER INC Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 450.77 600012708 01/03/2025 GRAINGER INC Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 2.13 600012708 01/03/2025 GRAINGER INC Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 23.04 600012708 01/03/2025 GRAINGER INC Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 78.05 600012708 01/03/2025 GRAINGER INC Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 127.02 600012709 01/03/2025 GRAINGER INC Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 92.16 600012708 01/03/2025 GRAINGER INC Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 31.31 600012708 01/03/2025 GRAINGER INC Water Utility Fund Repair & Maintenance 268.74 600012709 01/03/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 9,063.29 600012709 01/03/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 7,180.80 600012709 01/03/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 9,995.22 600012710 01/03/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 5,410.98 600012711 01/03/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 68.43 600012712 01/03/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 68.93 600012713 01/03/2025 REDWING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT Facilities Internal Service Uniform -Purchase 1.03 600012714 01/03/2025 REDWOOD LOCK INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 131.40 600012715 01/03/2025 SHERWIN WILLIAMS Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 57.64 600012716 01/03/2025 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 64.20 600012716 01/03/7025 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 200.00 600012716 01/03/2025 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 82.04 600012716 01/03/2025 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 85.60 600012716 01/03/2025 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 150.00 600012717 01/07/2025 B & L GLASS COMPANY Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 260.43 600012718 01/07/2025 CYRACOM INTERNATIONAL INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 388.70 600012719 01/07/2025 DELTA FIRE & SECURITY INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 562.50 600012720 01/07/2025 FASTENAL Facilities Internal Service Maintenance -Janitorial 846.92 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 259.44 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 463.77 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 259.44 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 113.67 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 365.46 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 113.67 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 351.45 600012721 01/07/202S FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 767.50 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM 5ECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 602.50 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 355.00 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 520.00 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 520.00 600012721 01/07/2025 FIRST ALARM SECURITIES SERVICES Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 478.75 600012722 01/07/2025 FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 15.55 600012722 01/07/2025 FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 173.63 600012722 01/07/2025 FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 13.71 600012722 01/07/2025 FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 33.88 600012722 01/07/2025 FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 16.16 600012722 01/07/2025 FRIEDMAN'$ HOME IMPROVEMENT Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 161.10 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 103.54 Page 4 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Equipment, Small Office & Tool (380.41) 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Maintenance -Janitorial 97.49 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 929.15 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 929.15 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 232.89 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 278.46 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 559.08 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 249.63 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 415.03 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 469.06 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 104.96 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 567.54 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 75.30 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 73.54 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty (257.89) 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 1,555.13 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 590.02 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 81.94 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 117.51 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 515.79 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 140.92 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 80.32 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 118.88 600012723 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 146.47 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 61.49 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 23.60 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 72.02 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 5.45 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 24.87 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 31.94 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 53.67 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 11.04 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 6.25 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 44.35 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 11.88 600012724 01/07/2025 GRAINGER INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 19.97 600012725 01/07/2025 NORTHGATE COMPANY INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 780.00 600012725 01/07/2025 NORTHGATE COMPANY INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 2,110.00 600012726 01/07/2025 NORTHGATE5 IN MOTION INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 240.00 600012726 01/07/2025 NORTHGATES IN MOTION INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 240.00 600012727 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 2,122.04 600012727 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 2,122.05 600012727 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC Sewer Utility Fund Utility -Electric 11,192.48 600012727 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC Wafter Utility Fund Utility -Electric 43,936.43 600012728 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 2,648.78 600012728 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 262.28 600012728 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 2,894,44 Page 5 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012729 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 1,600.58 600012730 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 17,242.02 600012730 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 195.69 600012730 01/07/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Debt -Principal 5,456.87 600012731 01/07/2025 REDWOOD LOCK INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 227.38 600012731 01/07/2025 REDWOOD LOCK INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 18.62 600012731 01/07/2025 REDWOOD LOCK INC Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 62.25 600012732 01/07/2025 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR Facilities Internal Service Repair & Maintenance-Fclty 1,001.70 600012733 01/07/2025 SANTA ROSA DANCE THEATER General Fund Unearned-Refd Outside Evnt 10,803.00 600012733 01/07/2025 SANTA ROSA DANCE THEATER General Fund Program Revenue -Box Office (1,080.30) 600012734 01/09/2025 A&D TITUS TRUCKING INC Water Utility Fund Other Exp-Repair System 1,500.00 600012735 01/09/2025 ANDREW IVAR BOLANDER General Fund Other Exp-PAC Production 400.00 600012736 01/09/7025 BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM ANIMAL HEALTH USA INC General Fund Other Exp-Animal Clinic NonElg 882.88 600012737 01/09/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 6,555.12 600012738 01/09/2025 COMPLETE WELDERS SUPPLY General Fund Other Exp-First Aid Supplies 223.33 600012739 01/09/2025 BUTLER ANIMAL HEALTH HOLDING COMPANY LLC General Fund Other Exp-Animal Clinic NonElg 78.23 600012739 01/09/2025 BUTLER ANIMAL HEALTH HOLDING COMPANY LLC General Fund Other Exp-Animal Clinic NonElg 409.19 600012740 01/09/2025 CREAM'S TOWING INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 637.50 600012741 01/09/2025 CSG CONSULTANTS INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,631.50 600012742 01/09/2025 DAIOHS USA INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 78.73 600012742 01/09/2025 DAIOHS USA INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 67.48 600012742 01/09/2025 DAIOHS USA INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 78.73 600012743 01/09/2025 DANIEL HOEKSTRA Fleet Services ISE Contract -Outside Services 2,035.00 600012743 01/09/2025 DANIEL HOEKSTRA Fleet Services ISE Fleet Veh Repairs for Streets 627.50 600012744 01/09/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,083.41 600012745 01/09/2025 DEBORAH YACOBELLIS General Fund Contract -Outside Services 11,613.49 600012746 01/09/2025 FASTENAL Fleet Services ISE Special Dept Expense 23.38 600012747 01/09/2025 FRIEDMAN'S HOME IMPROVEMENT Sewer Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 293.82 600012748 01/09/2025 FRIZELLE-ENDS COMPANY General Fund Othr Accrued Liab.-Sales Tax (1.59) 600012748 01/09/2025 FRIZELLE-ENOS COMPANY General Fund Special Dept Expense 1.59 600012748 01/09/2025 FRIZELLE-ENDS COMPANY General Fund Special Dept Expense 345.70 600012749 01/09/2025 GOODWIN CONSULTING GROUP INC CFD Westside CFD Westside PrSaTxAdim 2,940.00 600012750 01/09/2025 GRAINGER INC General Fund Uniform - Purchase 92.02 600012750 01/09/2025 GRAINGER INC Sewer Utility Fund Repair & Maintenance 3.65 600012751 01/09/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Deposits -Developer 2,595.00 600012751 01/09/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Deposits -Developer 2,182.50 600012751 01/09/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (2,595.00) 600012751 01/09/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (2,182.50) 600012751 01/09/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 2,595.00 600012751 01/09/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 2,182.50 600012752 01/09/2025 HANSEL FORD INC Fleet Services ISF Fleet Veh Repairs for WTR 5.51 600012753 01/09/2025 REDACTED RETIREE General Fund Benefit Medical Reimb 522.37 600012754 01/09/2025 MARK PIPPIN Fleet Services ISF Special Dept Expense 236.52 600012755 01/09/2025 REDACTED RETIREE General Fund Benefit Medical Reimb 3,055.20 600012756 01/09/2025 JAY'S ENGRAVING & RUBBER General Fund Special Dept Expense 187.84 600012757 01/09/2025 REDACTED RETIREE General Fund Benefit Medical Reimb 1,286.40 600012758 01/09/2025 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES General Fund Dues & Subscriptions 400.00 Page 6 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012759 01/09/2025 REDACTED RETIREE General Fund Benefit Medical Reimb 391.90 600012760 01/09/2025 LUBRIVAN TRUCK SERVICES INC Fleet Services ISF Fleet Veh Repairs for Fire 1,983.83 600012761 01/09/2025 REDACTED RETIREE General Fund Benefit Medical Reimb 1,085,80 600012762 01/09/2025 SANTA ROSA AUTO PARTS Sewer Utility Fund Special Dept Expense 38.43 600012763 01/09/2025 NEON ONE General Fund Bank & Merchant Fees 2,545.85 600012764 01/09/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 718,98 600012764 01/09/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Fuel 292.18 600012764 01/09/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Fuel 891.25 600012764 01/09/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Fuel 273.84 600012764 01/09/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Fuel 1,014.40 600012765 01/09/2025 NORTHERN COAST OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,479.00 600012766 01/09/2025 ARON SHERMAN General Fund Tuition Reimbursement 1,000.00 600012767 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 11,443.68 600012768 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 1,240,38 600012768 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 463.36 600012768 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 1,695.50 600012768 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 14,544.76 600012768 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 2,954.99 600012768 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Debt -Principal 3,505.36 600012769 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 13,303.19 600012770 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 3,724.62 600012770 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 3,700.70 600012770 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC Sewer Utility Fund Utility -Electric 29,742.71 600012770 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC Water Utility Fund Utility -Electric 44,298.87 600012771 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 355.06 600012771 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 1,416.78 600012771 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 3,457.98 600012771 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 2,089.91 600012772 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 80.15 600012773 01/09/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Utility -Electric 6,021.15 600012774 01/09/2025 CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLC General Fund Special Dept Expense 173.02 600012775 01/09/2025 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC General Fund Staffing Temp Contract Srvs 1,709.44 600012775 01/09/2025 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC General Fund Staffing Temp Contract Srvs 1,469.05 600012775 01/09/2025 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC General Fund Staffing Temp Contract Srvs 2,164.04 600012775 01/09/2025 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC General Fund Staffing Temp Contract Srvs 2,270.73 600012775 01/09/2025 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,172.16 600012775 01/09/2025 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,452.38 600012775 01/09/2025 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,172.16 600012776 01/09/2025 SANTA ROSA UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL General Fund Uniform - Purchase 266.53 600012776 01/09/2025 SANTA ROSA UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL General Fund Uniform - Purchase 841.80 600012777 01/09/2025 SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 180.00 600012778 01/09/2025 TRANSUNION General Fund Contract -Outside Services 75.00 600012779 01/09/2025 TROPE GROUP INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 96.00 600012780 01/09/2025 TRUE NORTH LANDSCAPES, LLC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,665.00 600012780 01/09/2025 TRUE NORTH LANDSCAPES, LLC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,995.00 600012781 01/09/2025 TYLER BUSINESS FORMS General Fund Office Expense 210.71 600012782 01/09/2025 UCPNB General Fund Contract -Outside Services 3,500.00 Page 7 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012783 01/09/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Contract -Outside Services 14,720.00 600012784 01/09/2025 USBANK General Fund Othr Accrued Liah-P Card 8,415.42 600012785 01/09/2025 VCA ANIMAL CARE CENTER OF SONOMA COUNTY General Fund Other Exp-Animal Clinic NonElg 46.27 600012786 01/09/2025 VESTIS GROUP INC Fleet Services ISF Uniform Laundry (200.00) 600012786 01/09/202S VESTIS GROUP INC Fleet Services ISF Uniform Laundry 75.31 600012786 01/09/2025 VESTIS GROUP INC Fleet Services ISF Uniform Laundry 65.80 600012786 01/09/2025 VESTIS GROUP INC Fleet Services ISF Uniform Laundry 59.99 600012786 01/09/2025 VESTIS GROUP INC Fleet Services ISF Uniform Laundry 70.74 600012786 01/09/2025 VESTIS GROUP INC Fleet Services ISF Uniform Laundry 76.49 600012786 01/09/2025 VESTIS GROUP INC Fleet Services ISF Uniform Laundry 75.00 600012786 01/09/2025 VESTIS GROUP INC Fleet Services ISF Uniform Laundry 70.75 600012787 01/09/2025 GCP WW HOLDCO LLC General Fund Uniform - Purchase 300.00 600012788 01/13/2025 DIANE MICHELI General Fund Contract Services -Instructors 616.00 600012789 01/13/2025 PETALUMA COMMUNITY ACCESS General Fund Contract -Outside Services 510.00 600012790 01/10/2025 BRINK'S INC General Fund Bank & Merchant Fees 1,800.56 600012790 01/10/2025 BRINK'S INC Sewer Utility Fund Bank & Merchant Fees 146.56 600012790 01/10/2025 BRINK'S INC Water Utility Fund Bank & Merchant Fees 146.55 600012791 01/10/2025 4 LEAF INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,620.00 600012791 01/10/2025 4 LEAF INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 412.50 600012791 01/10/2025 4 LEAF INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 49S.00 600012791 01/10/2025 4 LEAF INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 412.50 600012791 01/10/2025 4 LEAF INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 2,970.00 600012792 01/10/2025 ABM SERVICES INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 3,04S.00 600012793 01/10/2025 ACCESS CIG LLC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 11.92 600012793 01/10/2025 ACCESS CIG LLC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 9.41 600012793 01/10/2025 ACCESS CIG LLC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 74.69 600012793 01/10/2025 ACCESS CIG LLC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 11.92 600012793 01/10/2025 ACCESS CIG LLC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 29.49 600012794 01/10/2025 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC Water Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,050.00 600012794 01/10/2025 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC Water Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 30.00 600012794 01/10/2025 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC Water Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 312.00 600012794 01/10/202S ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC Water Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 312.00 600012794 01/10/2025 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC Water Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 375.00 600012794 01/10/2025 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC Water Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 312.00 600012794 01/10/2025 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC Water Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 26.00 600012795 01/10/2025 NORFIN INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 945.00 600012796 01/10/2025 HAROLD A. STEUBER INC Sewer Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 9.00 600012797 01/10/2025 AT&T MOBILITY General Fund Communication -Phone 1,146,94 600012797 01/10/2025 AT&T MOBILITY Fleet Services ISF Communication -Phone 56.38 600012797 01/10/202S AT&T MOBILITY Sewer Utility Fund Communication -Phone 28.19 600012797 01/10/2025 AT&T MOBILITY Sewer Utility Fund Communication -Phone 98.38 600012797 01/10/2025 AT&T MOBILITY Water Utility Fund Communication -Phone 153.91 600012797 01/10/2025 AT&T MOBILITY Water Utility Fund Communication -Phone 28.19 600012798 01/10/2025 BADGER METER INC Water Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 33.00 600012799 01/10/2025 BKF ENGINEERS CIP Government Capital Projects 3,021.50 600012800 01/10/2025 BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION General Fund Deposits -Developer 2,269.67 600012800 01/10/2025 BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION General Fund Deposits -Developer 924.69 Page 8 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012800 01/10/2025 BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (2,269.67) 600012800 01/10/2025 BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (924.69) 600012800 01/10/2025 BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 2,269.67 600012800 01/10/2025 BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 924.69 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 978.12 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 1,045,72 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 2,304.64 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 139.36 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 364.52 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 4,802.20 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 112.32 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 1,407.12 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP General Fund Professional Legal Fees 89.44 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP Sewer Utility Fund Professional Legal Fees 855.92 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP Water Utility Fund Professional Legal Fees 1,480.96 600012801 01/10/2025 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP Water Utility Fund Professional Legal Fees 855.92 600012802 01/10/2025 CAPTIONS UNLIMITED OF N€VADA INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 337.50 600012803 01/10/2025 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA General Fund Contract -Outside Services 8,651.61 600012803 01/10/2025 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA General Fund Contract -Outside Services 9,352.93 600012803 01/10/2025 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA General Fund Contract -Outside Services 5,683.02 600012803 01/10/2025 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA General Fund Contract -Outside Services 10,293.95 600012803 01/10/2025 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA General Fund Contract -Outside Services 5,624.18 600012803 01/10/2025 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA General Fund Contract -Outside Services 6,030.22 600012803 01/10/2025 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA General Fund Contract -Outside Services 11,587.33 600012804 01/10/2025 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Water Utility Fund Communication -Phone 227.98 600012804 01/10/2025 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Recycled Water Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 37.99 600012805 01/10/2025 CITY OF SANTA ROSA Recycled Water Utility Fund Water Purchase 5,800.40 600012806 01/10/2025 CLEARSTAR INC General Fund Recruitment 79.33 600012807 01/10/2025 COAR DESIGN GROUP CIP Government Non -Capital Projects 908.00 600012807 01/10/2025 COAR DESIGN GROUP CIP Sewer Capital Projects 12,326.50 600012807 01/10/2025 COAR DESIGN GROUP CIP Water Capital Projects 12,326.50 600012808 01/10/202S COASTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 10,962.50 600012808 01/10/2025 COASTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING INC CIP Sewer Capital Projects 28,879,25 600012808 01/10/2025 COASTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING INC CIP Water Capital Projects 1,322.50 600012809 01/10/2025 BUTLER ANIMAL HEALTH HOLDING COMPANY LLC General Fund Other Exp-Animal Clinic NonElg 1,031.68 600012810 01/10/2025 DAIOHS USA INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 187.20 600012810 01/10/2025 DAIOHS USA INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 50.00 600012810 01/10/2025 DAIOHS USA INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 179.28 600012810 01/10/2025 DAIOHS USA INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 81.00 600012811 01/10/2025 DATA TICKET INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 644.54 600012812 01/10/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 2,694,78 600012812 01/10/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 5,086.42 600012812 01/10/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 4,724,23 600012812 01/10/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC Graton Mitigation Contract -Outside Services 2,874,43 600012812 01/10/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC Graton Mitigation Contract -Outside Services 5,425.52 600012812 01/10/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC Graton Mitigation Contract -Outside Services 5,039.17 600012812 01/10/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC Graton JEPA Wilfred Contract -Outside Services 419.19 Page 9 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012812 01/10/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC Graton JEPA Wilfred Contract -Outside Services 791.22 60GO12812 01/10/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC Graton JEPA Wilfred Contract -Outside Services 734.88 600012812 01/10/2025 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC CIP Government Non -Capital Projects 3,362.00 600012813 01/10/2025 DIAN BARKAN MSW LCSW General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,260.00 600012814 01/10/2025 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORP CIP Government Capital Asset -Equipment 26,322.44 600012814 01/10/2025 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORP CIF Government Capital Asset -Equipment 12,677.33 600012815 01/10/2025 DRAFTECH BLUEPRINTING INC General Fund Printing 120.41 600012816 01/10/2025 DUDEK General Fund Deposits -Developer 1,647.50 600012816 01/10/2025 DUDEK General Fund Deposits -Developer 4,676.25 600012816 01/10/2025 DUDEK General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (1,647.50) 600012816 01/10/2025 DUDEK General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (4,676.25) 600012816 01/10/2025 DUDEK General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 1,647.50 600012816 01/10/2025 DUDEK General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 4,676.25 600012817 01/10/2025 EUREKA OXYGEN CO General Fund Other Exp-Special Events 39.86 600012817 01/10/2025 EUREKA OXYGEN CO Sewer Utility Fund Contract -Outside Services 89.15 600012819 01/10/2025 EVELINE URQUHART General Fund Contract Services -Instructors 807.30 600012819 01/10/2025 FASTENAL Facilities Internal Service Special Dept Expense 302,04 600012820 01/10/2025 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION General Fund Postage & Shipping 18.78 600012821 01/10/2025 FRC INC CIP Government Non -Capital Projects 6,683,80 600012822 01/10/2025 GHD INC CIP Government Capital Projects 10,486.43 600012823 01/10/2025 GOODWIN CONSULTING GROUP INC CFD Southeast CFD Southeast PrSaTxAdim 3,598.75 600012824 01/10/2025 GRAINGER INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 169.23 600012824 01/10/2025 GRAINGER INC General Fund Special Dept Expense 169.23 600012825 01/10/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Deposits -Developer 1,567.50 600012825 01/10/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Deposits -Developer 1,650.00 600012825 01/10/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Deposits -Developer 2,187.50 600012825 01/10/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (1,567.50) 600012825 01/10/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (1,650,00) 600012825 01/10/202S GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (2,187.50) 600012825 01/10/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 1,567,50 600012825 01/10/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 1,650.00 600012825 01/10/2025 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 2,187,50 600012826 01/10/2025 HOMEFIRST OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY General Fund Contract -Outside Services 23,210,60 600012826 01/10/2025 HOMEFIRST OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY Homeless Contract -Outside Services 208,023.26 600012827 01/10/2025 JACOBSON FENCE CO INC CIP Government Non -Capital Projects 3,887.00 600012828 01/10/2025 JAKE WATERMAN General Fund Contract Services -Instructors 2,469,60 600012829 01/10/2025 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC CIP Government Capital Projects 3,300,00 600012830 01/10/2025 LEIGHTRONIX Information Technology ISF Software Lic. & Sbscrptn Maint 1,295.00 600012831 01/10/2025 MINTIER HARNISH CIP Government Non -Capital Projects 20,653.63 600012832 01/10/2025 MOVEMENT LAB-BERNADETTE ALVERIO General Fund Unearned-Refd Outside Evnt 24,724.00 600012832 01/10/2025 MOVEMENT LAB-BERNADETTE ALVERIO General Fund Rents -Facilities -PAC (8,198,75) 600012832 01/10/2025 MOVEMENT LAB-BERNADETTE ALVERIO General fund Program Revenue -Box Office (2,472.40) 600012833 01/10/2025 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC General Fund Other Exp-Structural Fire PPE 170.38 600012833 01/10/2025 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC General Fund Other Exp-Structural Fire PPE 15,075.44 600012834 01/10/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Diesel 211.83 600012834 01/10/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 743.07 600012834 01/10/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 429.44 Page 10 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012834 01/10/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 531.68 600012834 01/10/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 722.50 600012834 01/10/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 1,342.32 600012834 01/10/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 528.06 600012834 01/10/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Inventories - Unleaded 443.01 600012834 01/10/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Fuel 360.29 600012834 01/10/2025 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING LLC General Fund Fuel 770.15 600012835 01/10/2025 NORTHGATE COMPANY INC General Fund Repair & Maintenance 5,400.00 600012836 01/10/2025 OFFICE DEPOT General Fund Office Expense 8.57 600012836 01/10/2025 OFFICE DEPOT General Fund Office Expense 40.66 600012836 01/10/2025 OFFICE DEPOT General Fund Office Expense 6.77 600012836 01/10/2025 OFFICE DEPOT General Fund Office Expense 32.10 600012836 01/10/2025 OFFICE DEPOT General Fund Office Expense 8.57 600012836 01/10/2025 OFFICE DEPOT General Fund Office Expense 40.66 600012836 01/10/2025 OFFICE DEPOT General Fund Office Expense 21.22 600012836 01/10/2025 OFFICE DEPOT General Fund Office Expense 100.60 600012837 01/10/2025 ONE STEP GPS General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,026.00 600012838 01/10/2025 ANDREW SMITH General Fund Travel and Training 82.80 600012839 01/10/2025 DAVID VALENCIA ROBLEDO JR Sewer Utility Fund Tuition Reimbursement 37.50 600012839 01/10/2025 DAVID VALENCIA ROBLEDO JR Water Utility Fund Tuition Reimbursement 37.50 600012840 01/10/2025 JEFFREY PONIKVAR-DOLNEY Water Utility Fund Benefits -Vision 150.00 600012841 01/10/2025 Evangelina Saldana General Fund Othr Accrued Liab.-PrkRec Rfnd 100.00 600012842 01/10/2025 Mark Keenan General Fund Permit Building Plan Check 926.14 600012842 01/10/2025 Mark Keenan General Fund Permit Fire Plan Check 299.39 600012843 01/10/2025 Thor Cary Electric Inc. General Fund License Business Rev 35.00 600012843 01/10/2025 Thor Cary Electric Inc. General Fund Fee -Building Inspection 272.50 600012844 01/10/2025 PACE SUPPLY Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 161.28 600012844 01/10/2025 PACE SUPPLY Water Utility Fund Repair & Maintenance 115.24 600012844 01/10/2025 PACE SUPPLY Water Utility Fund Other Exp-Repair System 537.78 600012844 01/10/2025 PACE SUPPLY Water Utility Fund Other Exp-Repair System 477.41 600012844 01/10/2025 PACE SUPPLY Water Utility Fund Other Exp-Repair System 460.95 600012844 01/10/2025 PACE SUPPLY Water Utility Fund Other Exp-Repair System 1,382,15 600012844 01/10/2025 PACE SUPPLY Water Utility Fund Other Exp-Repair System 658.50 600012844 01/10/2025 PACE SUPPLY Water Utility Fund Other Exp-Repair System (37.28) 600012844 01/10/2025 PACE SUPPLY Water Utility Fund Other Exp-Repair System 1,863.90 600012845 01/10/2025 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC General Fund Non -Capital Projects 25.46 600012846 01/10/2025 REXEL USA INC Water Utility Fund Equipment, Small Office & Tool 77.74 600012847 01/10/2025 POWERPLAN Fleet Services ISF Fleet Veh Repairs for Parks 362.31 600012848 01/10/2025 POWERSCHOOL HOLDINGS LLC Information Technology ISF Contract -Outside Services 4,012.50 600012849 01/10/2025 REGIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES AUTHORITY General Fund Contract -Outside Services 188.40 600012850 01/10/2025 ROHNERT PARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE General Fund Special Dept Expense 105.00 600012851 01/10/2025 RP EXPRESS LLC Fleet Services ISF Repair & Maintenance 273.00 600012852 01/10/2025 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPMENT CO General Fund Other Exp-PS-Amory 19,813.10 600012853 01/10/2025 SANDI CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS CIP Water Capital Projects 935.00 600012854 01/10/2025 SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,867.69 600012854 01/10/2025 SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 827.47 600012854 01/10/2025 SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,435.19 Page 11 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012855 01/10/2025 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD CIP Government Capital Projects 1,658.00 600012856 01/10/2025 STEVEN GROVER AND ASSOCIATES CIP Government Capital Projects 17,780.00 600012857 01/10/2025 TEAM GHILOTTI INC Sewer Utility Fund Retention Payable 1,870.90 600012858 01/10/2025 TERRY SIMPSON General Fund Recruitment 1,910.90 600012859 01/10/2025 REDACTED RETIREE General Fund Benefit Medical Reimb 5,905.96 600012860 01/10/2025 TRI CITY FENCE CO INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 15,343.00 600012861 01/10/2025 UNSHELTERED FRIENDS OUTREACH General Fund Contract -Outside Services 3,000.00 600012861 01/10/2025 UNSHELTERED FRIENDS OUTREACH General Fund Contract -Outside Services 3,000.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Deposits -Developer 300.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Deposits -Developer 60.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Deposits -Developer 420.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Deposits -Developer 570.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Deposits -Developer 30.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Deposits -Developer 120.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Deposits -Developer 150.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (300.00) 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (60.00) 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (420.00) 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (570,00) 600012862 01/10/202S RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (30.00) 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (120.00) 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Other Rev -Developer Deposit (150.00) 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 300.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 60.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 420.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 570.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 30.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 120.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Developer Deposit Expense 150.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Contract -Outside Services 7,605.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Contract -Outside Services 21,394.50 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Contract -Outside Services 4,920.00 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Contract -Outside Services 1,209.85 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Contract -Outside Services 5,770.46 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Contract -Outside Services 3,431.70 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Contract -Outside Services 7,327,69 600012862 01/10/2025 RAYLEE GLASSER General Fund Contract -Outside Services 288.50 600012863 01/10/2025 US BANK General Fund Othr Accrued Liab-P Card 16,845.90 600012864 01/10/2025 VERSATERM PUBLIC SAFETY US INC General Fund Contract -Outside Services 9,162.00 600012865 01/10/2025 WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANSPORTATION INC CIP Government Capital Projects 4,939.25 600012865 01/10/2025 WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANSPORTATION INC CIP Government Capital Projects 5,545.75 60001286E 01/10/2025 WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANSPORTATION INC CIP Government Capital Projects 3,485.50 600012865 01/10/2025 WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANSPORTATION INC CIP Government Capital Projects 3,353.25 600012866 01/10/2025 REDACTED RETIREE General Fund Benefit Medical Reimb 1,235.87 600012867 01/10/2025 WERLE ENTERPRISE LLC NATIONAL PRINT & PROMO General Fund Special Dept Expense 54.21 600012867 01/10/2025 WERLE ENTERPRISE LLC NATIONAL PRINT & PROMO General Fund Office Expense 56.21 600012867 01/10/2025 WERLE ENTERPRISE LLC NATIONAL PRINT & PROMO General Fund Printing 61.75 Page 12 of 13 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME FUND ACCOUNT AMOUNT 600012868 01/10/2025 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES Successor Agency-CDC-ROPS Contract -Outside Services 500.00 1,757,117.29 Page 13 of 13 Item 8A2 REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CASH REPORT TO: The Chair and Members of the Community FROM: Betsy Howze, Finance Director Redevelopment Successor Agency of the City of Rohnert Park Marcela Piedra, City Manager CASH BALANCES AS OF November 30 2024 RPTTF Funds (i) Debt Service Reserve Fund (1999 TABS) (2) Debt Service Fund (2007R TABS) (1) Debt Service Fund (2018 A & B TABs) (1) Prepared By: Justin Rosales TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY CASH (1) Appropriated for debt service payments & ROPS obligations. (2) Required minimum debt service reserves. $ 2,149,057.65 1,084,818.88 1.01 2,448.80 $ 3,236,326.34 CASH DISTRIBUTION AS OF November 30, 2024 Checking Accounts: Interest Rate City Managed Pooled Rate 2.927% $ 2,149,057.65 $ 2,149,057.65 $ 2,149,057.65 CASH HELD BY FISCAL AGENTS: Investment Maturity Interest Source of Investment Institution Type Date Rate Par Value Market Value Valuation 1999 TAB'S: US Bank -Trustee 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Special Fund Blackrock Prov Tfund N/A 4,53% $ 0,24 $ 0.24 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Interest Fund Blackrock Prov Tfund Trees. Note N/A F53% 35,050,29 35,050,29 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds PrincipalFund: Blackrock Prov Tfund Trees. Note N/A 4.53% 72A2 72 42 Note (2) 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Reserve Fund: Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas. Note N/A 4.53% 1,049,695.93 1,049,695.93 Note (1) Total 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds Fund $1,084,818,64 $ 1,084,818.88 1,084,818.88 2007R TAB'S US Bank -Trustee 2007R Tax Allocation Bonds Interest Fund: Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas. Note N/A 4.26% $ 0.01 $ 001 Note (1) 2007R Tax Allocation Bonds Redemption Fund: Blackrock Prov Tfund Treas. Note N/A 4.28% 1.00 1.00 Note (1) Total 2007R Tax Allocation Bonds Fund $ 1.01 $ 1.01 1.01 2018A & 2018B TAB'S US Bank -Trustee 2018A Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Fund Interest Account First American Treasury Oblig Ftl Cl Treas. Note N/A 4.30 % $ 2018A Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Fund Principal Account Build America Mutual Assurance Co Treas. Note N/A 2018A Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Fund Reserve Sub Account Build America Mutual Assurance Co Treas. Note N/A 0.00 % Total 2018A&B Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Fund 8 TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY CASH 2447,80 $ 2,447.80 Note (1) Note (1) 1 00 1.00 Note (1) 244880 $ 2,448.80 2,448.80 $ 3,236,326.34 Investment Yield for November 30, 2024 3.465% INVESTMENT POLICY S, SUFFICIENT FUNDS DISCLOSURES The investments above are In compliance with the investment policy of the Redevelopment Successor Agency of the City of Rohnert Park as outlined in the City of Rohnert Park City Council Resolution #2021-144, adopted on December 14, 2021. Due to the dissolution of the redevelopment agencies by the State of California the funds to meet the agency's expenditures will by determined by the State Department of Finance. Note (1) The source of valuation for these investments is their respective monthly Union Bank Trust Statements. The Par Value and Market Value for these investments are typically the same as interest is paid or wired monthly. Note (2) Required minimum debt service reserves. City of Rohnert Park Cash Report As of November 30, 2024 To: The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council Marcela Piedra, City Manager Summary of General Fund Cash Total General Fund Cash Restricted (External) ................ Assigned ....................................................... Subtotal (not available to spend) ......__...—............................................. •... Unassigned Restricted Detail: ------------------- Refundable Deposits Senior Center Donations .................................................................... PARS Contribution Trust .................................................................... Housing Program Assigned Detail: Item 8 A3 From: Betsy Howze Finance Director Prepared By: Justin Rosales ......................................................................................................................... $ 30,346,238.66 .............................................................................. $ 1,348,382.97 ........................ ... 27,777,805.17 $ 29,126,188.14 1,220,050.52 ....................... $ 768,663.72 .......................... 100,000.00 ............................. I............................. 449,101.99 ........................... 30,617.26 382.97 Contingency Reserve ......................................................................................................................... $ 2,842,324.05 Operating Reserve ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9,663,903.37 Assigned Retirement Reserve ..................... .......... 4,077,690.60 City Facilities Reserve 65,453.00 Self -Insured Losses Reserve 1,764,301.31 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Infrastructure Reserve 9,077,690.60 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Retiree Health Savings Reserve 286,442.24 $ 27,777,805.17 Enterprise Fund Water Utility Operations Fund ................................................................................................................................................................. $ 10,826,562.20 Water Capacity Fund 2,464,515.07 Capital Preservation Water Fund .............................................................................................................................................................................._ 6,993,355.54 Water Capital Fund (287,133.09 ) ) Per Acre For Development Fee Fund ..........................-..................................................................................................................................._...................._ 17,530.00 ................... .....,......I........I................................................. Sewer Utility Operations Fund 18,315,451 86 Capital Preservation Sewer .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3,561,111.31.... Sewer Capital Fund .................................................................................................................................................................... ............................ 133,652.70 JEPA Deposit - Wastewater ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 520,277.05 Recycled Water Operation Funds 1,086,033.81 Recycled Water Capital Fund ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,327.05 Capital Preservation Recycled Water Fund 75,691.64 Refuse Utility Operations Fund 574,604.18 Golf Course Enterprise Fund 772,266.03 --- - - - --- --- --- --- -- ---.........- ......................................................................................................................................................................................................_... Total Enterprise Funds ..-- $ 45,055,245.35 1of3 City of Rohnert Park Cash Report Continued As of November 30, 2024 Internal Service Fund Cash Facilities Internal Service Fund (273,925.76) .-....... -.....I.....................I............................................ ..............................I.....................................................................................................................................................i6rnal Service Funds $ 8,938,372.02 Special Revenue Funds ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... AB2987/PEG Fees Fund $ 630,471.24 ........... ....................................................................................................................................................... I ............ . ................................................... . ............................. ..................................... General Plan Maintenance Fee Revenue Fund 391.737.65 Affordable Housingi nkage Fee Fund ................ .............................. ............................... ....................................................................................................... 14,062.40 .............................................. Affordable Housing Residential Fee Fund .......................................................................................................................................... I ................................................. ................... 72,863.31 ..................... ................. ........................... . ...... . . .......................... Homeless Fund ......... ............................................................................................................................... . ........................ . .... . ............................ 1,008,414.04 . .... . .......... ................... . . . ..... .... . ...................... . ................. Tree in Lieu Fund .P... ...... I ............................................................................................ . ...................... . .................. . . .... .................................... . ......... ............... . ............................ 58,017.12 Park in Lieu Fee Fund ............... I ..................................... .......................................................................................................................................................... .......................... ................... 787,850.36 . ..... I .............................................................. UDSP Maintenance Annuity Fund ..... ................................................................. ................................... I ................................ 4,355,778.05 I ......................................... .... ....... .............. ........................... Public Facilities Finance Fee Fund .............................................................................. ............................................................................................ 17,632,765.39 . ..................................... . ............................. . ......................... . ........ Public Facilities Finance Admin Fund . 189.856.47 SOMO Pavement Maintenance/I e"r*'v"'ic"*e' .... F, ... e .... e *F-u-r ... CFD SouthEast Fund ......................................................... 41,783.65 105,379.51 50 61 CFD Bristol Fund .... ............................................................................................................ I .................................. ............................................................... I .......... . ...................... 127,806.37 Westside LLD Fund ......Fee ......Fund ................................. ... ... ....Traffic -- ............................................................................... ................................. - ................................ . ............ . .. . ........... 74,148.00 SESP Regional ..................................................................................... . . . ... . . .. . . . ....... . .. . ..................................... ........ ............................ 1,343,016.41 .............. I ........................................ . .. . ................. SESP Valley House Mitigation Fund .......................... . . . ................ ........................................................................................ .............................................. '§ifdFA�trl I ........... ................... 334,648.97 I PS Personnel Fund I ... ................................................................................... ............................... ..... ... ......................... I .......................................................................................... . .......... . ........ ........................................................ 20,549.00 Rent Appeals Board Fund I ........................................... 246.717.44 Vehicle Abatement Fund ....................... SLESF Fund We' as ................... .. u ... r'e'* ..... M P ..............ark..... ..a ... r'k' s .... F-6 *n-d' 1 21 Refuse Road Impact Fee Fund 276.97 ..... . ................. . .............. . . . ............................................ ............... I ............... ................... ............... 1- ....... ............... ........ .... ........................................ . .......... ...................................... Gas Tax Funds: Sec. 2107 Maint/Const 3,222,857.40 ..... ..................... ..- ................................................................ ............................................... I .......... I ............................ ............................................................................. - 1 .. x Funds: Sec. 2031 RMRA 1.453.838.08 2 of 3 City of Rohnert Park Cash Report Continued As of November 30, 2024 Revenue Funds Senior Center Fund $ 251,455.33 ................................................... 140.851.12 Graton Mitigation Fund ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3,274,663.53 Graton Supplemental Fund ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I...................I....... 18,937,131.30 Casino Neighborhood Upgrade Work Force Housing ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,037,930.11 City of Rohnert Park Foundation ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3,117,337.27 Casino Public Safety Capital Contribution .........................................................................................................................................................................-............................................................. 38,215.69 6.6.2-Wilfred JEPA Fund ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,155,388.17 ................................................................................................ CRPUSD School Contribution Fund ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 165,974.25 Tribe Charity Fund 10.00 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Cal Home.Loan .Housing Project Fund......................................................................................................................................................................269.219:74... RDA Housing Project Fund .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-...................... 740,473.93 Total Special Revenue Funds $ 68,122,130.76 Capital Project Funds General Fund Infrastructure ........................................................................... City Capital Proiects Fund 2007 R Bond Proceeds Fund Total Capital Projects Funds Permanent Funds Arts Center Donations Fund Endowment Fund (1) Total Permanent Funds Trust & Aaencv Funds State Seized Assets Fund ....................................................................... _ ......... Total Trust & Agency Funds Total Cash All City Funds 761 1rr $ 338,960.01 ........................................................... 172,221.53 $ 511,181.54 $ 162,669,248.78 (1) Per the tat amendment to the Dorothy Spreckels 1999 Trust, Section 3.4.1; $500,000 is "to be held as an endowment fund. The income of the fund (but no part of the principal or appreciation thereof, realized or unrealized) shall be used for the general charitable purposes of the City of Rohnert Park's Dorothy Rohnert Spreckels Preforming Arts Center." September 1, 2017 Dorothy Spreckels Endowment funds were loaned to the Water Fund at 3% interest. 3 of 3 Item 8B City of Rohnert Park Council Members Expense Report by Quarter Fiscal Year 24/25 Account Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 YTD Total Budget Remaining Budget City Representation 63800 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 750.00 $ 750.00 City Representation 63810 - - - - 750.00 750.00 Rodriguez 63820 503.92 1,129.12 - - 1,633.04 4,000.00 2,366.96 Sanborn 63830 1,248.97 1,163.86 - 2,412.83 4,000.00 1,587.17 Giudice 63840 1,015.55 1,142.71 - - 2,158.26 4,000.00 1,841.74 Elward 63850 935.01 2,600.68 - - 3,535.69 4,000.00 464.31 Hollingsworth -Adams 63860 696.07 1,273.23 - 1,969.30 4,000.00 2,03Q70 Total $ 4,399.52 $ 7,309.60 $ - $ $ 11,709.12 $ 21,500.00 $ 9,790.88 * Note: Expenses are reported when paid not attended fi/II/Zo L5 City of Rohnert Park Council Members Quarterly Travel Expense 2nd QTR Quarter October 2024 - December 2024 Account Event Description Check Date Amount City Representation 63800 $ - City Representation 63810 - 5 - Rodriguez 63820 2024 Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo Per Diem _ 10/10/2024 $ 192.05 Champions for Children Registration 11/6/2024 75.00 iDia De Los Cien 11/6/2024 25.00 2024 California Summit 11/6/2024 550.00 Cancelled Flight League CA Cities Conference Refund 11/6/2024 (298.92) Lodging League of CA Cities 11/6/2024 555.41 Flight League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 17.25 Flight League CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 255.93 Flight League CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 188.48 Cancelled Flight NLC Conference Refund 12/6/2024 (566.95) COPE Dinner American Federation of Labor & North Bay Labor Council 12/6/2024 70.00 2024 Fall Economic Perspective 12/6/2024 65.87 $ 1,129.12 Sanborn 63830 Mileage reimbursement SRP GSA Mtg. 12/6/2024 $ 15.28 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 99.95 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 106.95 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 84.97 Travel League of CA Cities Conference Refund 11/6/2024 (41.72) Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 59.44 Lodging League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 833.12 2024 Fall Economic Prospective 12/6/2024 65.87 2024 Fall Economic Prospective Refund 12/6/2024 (60.00) $ 1,163.86 Giudice 63840 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 $ 99.95 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 106.95 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 84.97 Travel League of CA Cities Conference Refund 11/6/2024 (41.72) Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 59.44 Lodging League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 833.12 $ 1,142.71 Elward 63850 2024 Centennial City Summit Per Diem 11/12/2024 $ 381.80 "National Print & Promo Name Badge 11/12/2024 15.96 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 99.95 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 106.95 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 84.97 Travel League of CA Cities Conference Refund 11/6/2024 (41.72) Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 79.97 Lodging League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 833.12 Lodging 2024 Centennial City Summit 12/6/2024 1,039.66 Lodging 2024 Centennial City Summit 12/6/2024 0.02 $ 2,600.68 Hollingsworth -Adams 63860 2024 Sonoma County Employment of People with Disabilities Awards 11/6/2024 $ 40.00 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 99.95 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 106.95 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 84.97 Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 (41.72) Travel League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 79.96 Lodging League of CA Cities Conference 11/6/2024 833.12 COPE Dinner American Federation of Labor & North Bay Labor Council 12/6/2024 70.00 Note: Expenses are reported when paid not attended *Original invoice was reclassed after 1st Qtr p 1,U3.L3 $ 7,309.60 Item 8C MINUTES OF THE JOINT REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK City Council Rohnert Park Financing Authority Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission Tuesday, January 14, 2025 1. CITY COUNCIL/RPFA/SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CDC JOINT REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Mayor Adams called the joint regular meeting to order at 5:00 p.m., the notice for which being legally noticed on January 9, 2025. All Council Present: Gerard Giudice, Mayor Emily Sanborn, Vice Mayor Susan H. Adams, Councilmember Jackie Elward, Councilmember Samantha Rodriguez, Councilmember Staff present: City Manager Piedra, City Attorney Kenyon, Public Safety Director Mattos, Director of Human Resources Cannon, Director of Development Services Giudice, Director of Community Services Bagley, Finance Director Howze, Director of Public Works Garrett, Housing Manager Garcia, Finance Manager Ortega De Valencia, Senior Analyst E. Tacata, Code Compliance Manager Stephens, Information Systems Technician II Azevedo, and City Clerk Lopez Cuevas. 2. READING OF THE LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT Read by Mayor Giudice. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Led by Nolan Beauchamp. 4. PRESENTATIONS A. Presentation by Director of Public Safety Mattos: Swearing In and Introduction of Public Safety Officers Jesse Asher, Chanielle Beauchamp, Colby Culbertson, Anthony Fugazzi, Auston Grey, Brandon Haug, Thomas Izard, and Barret Wickenburg. Director of Public Safety Mattos administered the Oath of Office to the new officers and introduced them to the Council and the residents. 5. DEPARTMENT HEAD BRIEFING None. City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes for City Council January 14, 2025 RPFA/CDC Successor Agency Page 2 of 8 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jason Taormino, the new PG&E Government Relations Representative, introduced himself to the council and the residents. Peter Alexander spoke about fires and gardens. Michael McGon spoke about the need for school supplies. Jake Mackenzie spoke about his appointment as the City's Representative to the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Board of Trustees. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: Mayor Giudice stated he leases premises in SOMO Village and therefore has a potential financial conflict of interest on Item 7.J. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR TA Acceptance of Reports from Finance Department: Acceptance of Reports from Finance Department: 1. City Bills/Demands for Payment dated November 30, 2024 through December 30, 2024 2. Successor Agency Cash Report for October 2024 3. City Cash Report for October 2024 7.13 Approval of Minutes for City Council/RPFA/Successor Agency Joint Regular Meeting, December 10, 2024 TC Confirm Mayor's Letter Designating an Alternate Voting Representative at the Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association Board and City Selection Committee Meetings 7.1) Confirm Jake Mackenzie as the City's Representative to the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Board of Trustees for a Term to Expire December 31, 2028 TE Confirm the Appointment of Tramaine Austin -Dillon, Fanny Wing Ah Lam, and Tim Campbell to Serve on the Rohnert Park Planning Commission for Terms Expiring December 31, 2028 7.17 Receive a Report Regarding Recruitment Efforts to Fulfill One Vacancy on the Building Appeals Board for a Term expiring December 31, 2028 7.G Receive Progress Report on the Status of the Emergency Public Safety Antenna and Radio System Replacement Project (CIP2412), as required by the Public Contract Code and by Minute Order, authorize the continuation of Resolution 2024-051 until the emergency action is completed TH Adopt Resolution 2025-001 of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park as Successor Agency to the Former Community Development Commission of the City of Rohnert Park Approving the Annual Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) for the Period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026 (ROPS 25-26) Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the California Health and Safety Code 7.1 Adopt Resolution 2025-002 Accepting the Development Impact Fees Annual Report and Required Five -Year Findings for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024, Pursuant to AB 1600 TJ Adopt Resolution 2025-003 Authorizing and Approving a Public Facilities Fee Credit Agreement with SOMO Village, LLC and Finding the Action Exempt Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Section 15061(b)(3) City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes for City Council January 14, 2025 RPFA/CDC Successor Agency Page 3 of 8 7.K Adopt Resolution 2025-004 Authorizing City Manager to Execute Program Supplement No. F016 to Master Agreement Administering Agency -State Agreement for Federal Aid Projects No. 04-5379F15 for Hwy. 101 Bike/Ped Overcrossing at Copeland Creek (Federal Project No. CML-5379(027)), Accepting $3,350,000 Federal Funding Award, Appropriating $220,000 from Measure M Transportation Fund (Fund 4327) for CIP2202 and the Federal funding of $3,350,000, and Amending Project Budget for CIP2202 to $4,345,000 (CEQA Status: Exempt Under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines §§ 15306) 7.L. Receive a Report Regarding Appointments to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Mobile Home Rent Appeals Board, Parks and Recreation Commission, and the Senior Citizens Advisory Commission for Terms Expiring December 31, 2028 ACTION: Moved/seconded (Elward/Rodriguez) to approve the consent calendar. Vice Mayor Giudice will abstain from voting on Item 7.J. Motion carried by the following unanimous 5-0-0-0 voice vote: AYES: Elward, Rodriguez, Sanborn, Giudice, and Adams, NOES: None, ABSENT: None, ABSTAINS: None. Item 7.J. was adopted by the following 4-0-0-1 voice vote: AYES: Elward, Rodriguez, Sanborn, and Adams, NOES: None, ABSENT: None, ABSTAINS: Giudice. 8. REGULAR ITEMS: A. Receive an Informational Presentation on Recent Storm and Flood Events in the City, Discuss and Provide Direction Regarding Storm Drainage System Assessment and Flood Mitigation Strategies. Director of Public Works Garrett and Director of Public Safety Mattos presented this item. Recommended Action(s): Receive a presentation on storm and flood events and provide direction regarding studies of the City's storm drainage system. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Tracy Franco spoke about this item. Councilmember Adams left the dais at 6:23 p.m. and returned at 6:24 p.m. DIRECTION: By Consensus (none opposed), Council received the report and directed staff to move forward with their recommended action and further study the city's storm drainage system. Staff will return at a future council meeting to discuss adding a full-time employee to lead and manage the effort and other options for replacing tasks with this assignment. B. Receive an Informational Presentation, Discuss and Provide Direction to Staff Regarding the Rohnert Park Active Transportation Plan. Senior Analyst E. Tacata and Fehr & Peers Fehr Senior Planner Kelly Band presented this item. Recommended Action(s): Receive a presentation and provide direction on Rohnert Park Active Transportation Plan adoption. City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes for City Council January 14, 2025 RPFA/CDC Successor Agency Page 4 of 8 PUBLIC COMMENTS: Steve Keith and Eris Weaver spoke about this item. Council received the report. Mayor Giudice declared a recess at 7:02 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:10 p.m. C. Consider Adopting a Resolution Authorizing and Approving a Memorandum of Understanding for the Strategic Partnership between Sonoma State University, the City of Rohnert Park, and the City of Cotati. City Manager Piedra presented this item. Recommended Action(s): Adopt Resolution 2025-005 Authorizing and Approving a Memorandum of Understanding for the Strategic Partnership between Sonoma State. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Jeff Keating spoke about this item. ACTION: Moved/seconded (Rodriguez/Elward) to adopt Resolution 2025-005. Motion carried by the following unanimous 5-0-0-0 voice vote: AYES: Adams, Elward, Rodriguez, Sanborn, and Giudice NOES: None, ABSENT: None, ABSTAINS: None. D. Introduce by Title Only and Waive the First Reading of Ordinance No. 986 Amending Chapters 1.16 (General Penalty), 1.24 (Nuisance Abatement), 1.25 (Administrative Citation Program), 1.26 (Administrative Hearings) and 1.27 (Collection Procedures) and adding a new Chapter 1.23 (Nuisance Defined) within Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code to Streamline the Administrative Citation and Nuisance Abatement Processes and Increasing Fines for Short -Term Rental Violations. Director of Development Services Giudice presented this item. Also present was Housing Manager Garcia. Recommended Action(s): Introduce by Title Only and Waive the First Reading of Ordinance 986, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park Amending Chapters 1.16 (General Penalty), 1.24 (Nuisance Abatement), 1.25 (Administrative Citation Program), 1.26 (Administrative Hearings) and 1.27 (Collection Procedures) and adding a new Chapter 1.23 (Nuisance Defined) within Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code to Streamline the Administrative Citation and Nuisance Abatement Processes and Increasing Fines for Short -Term Rental Violations PUBLIC COMMENTS: Steve Keith spoke this item. ACTION: Moved/seconded (Elward/Rodriguez) to Introduce by Title Only and Waive the First Reading of Ordinance 986. Title read by Councilmember Rodriguez. Motion carried by the following unanimous 5-0-0-0 roll call vote: AYES: Adams, Elward, Rodriguez, Sanborn, and Giudice NOES: None, ABSENT: None, ABSTAINS: None. City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes for City Council January 14, 2025 RPFA/CDC Successor Agency Page 5 of 8 E. By Minute Order, (1) Form a Disaster Response Planning Ad Hoc Committee to Review Existing Emergency Plans, Policies, and Resources; (2) Dissolve the City's Education Committee; (3) Receive Report From Mayor on Mayor's Assignments of Councilmembers to City Council Liaison Positions, and Sub -Committees, including if formed, the Disaster Response Planning Ad Hoc Committee; and (4) Council Confirmation of Mayor's Nominations of Councilmembers and Staff to Outside Agencies. City Clerk Lopez Cuevas presented this item. Recommended Action(s): By Minute Order, (1) Form a Disaster Response Planning Ad Hoc Committee to Review Existing Emergency Plans, Policies, and Resources; (2) Dissolve the City's Education Committee; (3) Receive Report From Mayor on Mayor's Assignments of Councilmembers to City Council Liaison Positions, and Sub -Committees, including if formed, the Disaster Response Planning Ad Hoc Committee; and (4) Council Confirmation of Mayor's Nominations of Councilmembers and Staff to Outside Agencies. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. ACTION: Moved/seconded (Adams/Rodriguez), Council directed staff to form a Disaster Response Planning Ad Hoc Committee to work with the City Manager's Office to review existing emergency plans, policies, and resources and to identify strengths, gaps, and areas for improvement for 12 months. Motion carried by the following unanimous 5-0-0-0 voice vote: AYES: Adams, Elward, Rodriguez, Sanborn, and Giudice NOES: None, ABSENT: None, ABSTAINS: None. ACTION: Moved/seconded (Adams/Rodriguez), Council directed staff to Dissolve the City's Education Committee. Motion carried by the following unanimous 5-0-0-0 voice vote: AYES: Adams, Elward, Rodriguez, Sanborn, and Giudice NOES: None, ABSENT: None, ABSTAINS: None. Council received Report from Mayor Giudice on Mayor's Assignments of Councilmembers to City Council Liaison Positions, and Sub -Committees, including the newly formed Disaster Response Planning Ad Hoc Committee. ACTION: Moved/seconded (Adams/Rodriguez) to confirm Mayor's Nominations of Councilmembers and Staff to Outside Agencies. Motion carried by the following unanimous 5-0-0-0 voice vote: AYES: Adams, Elward, Rodriguez, Sanborn, and Giudice NOES: None, ABSENT: None, ABSTAINS: None. City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes for City Council January 14, 2025 RPFA/CDC Successor Agency Page 6 of 8 Standing Committees Mayor's Appointees 1. Economic Development Adams/Giudice 2. Waste and Recycling Sanborn/Elward 3 Water/Wastewater Issues (to include Creek Sanborn/Elward Master Plan Sub. Ad Hoc Committees [NOTE: May be formed from time to time for a Mayor's Appointees specific ur ose and limited duration 1 Foundation Ad Hoc Committee (Expires Jan Rodriguez/Adams 23, 2025 2 Disaster Response Planning Ad Hoc Giudice/Rodriguez Committee Liaison Assignments Mayor's Appointee Alternate 1 Chamber of Commerce (Board of Directors) Rodriguez Sanborn 2 Golf Course Oversight Committee Rodriguez Adams 3 Rohnert Park-Cotati Regional Library Adams Elward Advisory Board 4 Senior Citizens Advisory Commission Elward Sanborn Mayor's Appointee Outside Agency Appointments (with Council Alternate confirmation) 1 Association of Bay Area Government Adams Sanborn ABAG General Assembly Mayors and Council Members' Association of 2 Sonoma County Legislative Committee Giudice Sanborn (Mayors & Councilmembers 3 CaliforniafoIntergovernmental Risk Authority Jamie Cannon Marcela Piedra Sonoma County Transportation 4 Authority/Regional Climate Protection Giudice Elward Authority (SCTA/RCPA 5 Zero Waste Sonoma Sanborn Vanessa Garrett 6 Sonoma Clean Power (SCP) Elward Adams 7 Water Advisory Committee (WAC) to Sanborn Rodriguez Sonoma Water 8 Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Sustainability Sanborn Elward Agency GSA 9 Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District Giudice Rodriguez CRPUSD 2X2X2 City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes for City Council January 14, 2025 RPFA/CDC Successor Agency Page 7 of 8 C. Appointment of Representative from Rohnert Park and Cotati to the Board of the Sonoma County Homelessness Coalition (formerly Continuum of Care). City Clerk Lopez Cuevas presented this item. Recommended Action(s): Re -appoint Rohnert Park Councilmember Elward to the Board of the Sonoma County Homelessness Coalition (formerly Continuum of Care), and Cotati Mayor Sparks as the alternate. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. ACTION: Moved/seconded (Giudice/Adams) to appoint Councilmember Elward to the Board of the Sonoma County Homelessness Coalition, and Cotati Mayor Sparks as the alternate. Motion carried by the following unanimous 5-0-0-0 voice vote: AYES: Adams, Elward, Rodriguez, Sanborn, and Giudice NOES: None, ABSENT: None, ABSTAINS: None. 9. COMMITTEE / LIAISON/ OTHER REPORTS A. City Standing Committees, Council Liaison Assignments, Outside Agency and Mayors & Councilmembers/City Selection Committee Appointments and Reports Under Government Code Section 53232.3(d): • Councilmember Elward reported on the Homeless Coalition Board (11/27), Sonoma Clean Power Authority Board of Directors Meeting 12/5). • Councilmember Adams reported the Library Advisory Board (12/17) was canceled. • Councilmember Rodriguez reported on the Rohnert Park Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors Meeting (12/17). • Vice Mayor Sanborn reported on the Zero Waste Sonoma (11/21), Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Sustainability Agency (12/12) and the Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmembers Board of Directors Meeting (1/9/25). • Mayor Giudice provided a written report on the SCTA/RCPA Board of Directors (12/9) and reported on the Board of Directors Meeting Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District (12/20). The Sonoma County Transportation Authority/Sonoma County Regional Climate Protection Authority Board of Directors (1/13) was cancelled. • Reports Under Government Code Section 53232.3(d): Councilmember Rodriguez reported on the 2024 Economic Perspective (11/21) Rodriguez. Vice Mayor Sanborn and Mayor Giudice reported on the Chamber Noon Times (12/4) 10. COMMUNICATIONS Councilmember Rodriguez invited all to attend the following events: Rancho Cotati ASB fundraiser at Jersey Mike's (1/15), Sonoma County Museum Lunar NewYear (1/19), Coffee with a op (1/22), Redemption House Bay Area Human Trafficking Awareness Documentary at SSU (1/23), Sonoma Clean Power PG&E Bill Assistance at Senior Center (1/24) NAACP Freedom Gala and the RPPSOA Crab feed (1/25). City of Rohnert Park Joint Regular Meeting Minutes for City Council January 14, 2025 RPFA/CDC Successor Agency Page 8 of 8 11. ADDING AGENDA ITEMS TO A FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA None. 12. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 13. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Giudice adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Sylvia Lopez Cuevas, City Clerk Gerard Giudice, Mayor City of Rohnert Park City of Rohnert Park N F eT LI) �M1LIFARpti� ITEM NO. 8.D. Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Communityfor Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: January 28, 2025 Department: Development Services Submitted By: Alicia Giudice, Director of Development Services Prepared By: Eric Stephens, Code Compliance Manager & Jenna Garcia, Housing Manager Agenda Title: Waive the Second Reading of and Adopt Ordinance No. 986, an Ordinance Amending Chapters 1.16 (General Penalty), 1.24 (Nuisance Abatement), 1.25 (Administrative Citation Program), 1.26 (Administrative Hearings) and 1.27 (Collection Procedures) and adding a new Chapter 1.23 (Nuisance Defined) within Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code to Streamline the Administrative Citation and Nuisance Abatement Processes and Increasing Fines for Short -Term Rental Violations RECOMMENDED ACTION: Waive the Second Reading of and Adopt Ordinance No. 986, an ordinance amending Chapters 1.16 (General Penalty), 1.24 (Nuisance Abatement), 1.25 (Administrative Citation Program), 1.26 (Administrative Hearings) and 1.27 (Collection Procedures) and adding a new Chapter 1.23 (Nuisance Defined) within Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code to streamline the administrative citation and nuisance abatement processes and increasing fines for short-term rental violations. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: On January 14, 2025, the City Council held a public meeting and unanimously waived the first reading and introduced an ordinance amending the Rohnert Park Municipal Code Title 1 concerning the administrative citation and nuisance abatement processes and increasing fines for short-term rental violations. The code revisions in the ordinance can be categorized into three main areas: reorganization and clarification, process streamlining, and updates to align with state law. Reorganization and Clarification The revised Title 1 aims to enhance clarity, usability, and readability through the reorganization of key chapters. The proposed code outline includes: 1. Chapter 1.23: Nuisance Defined (New Chapter) oo Defines nuisances and includes definitions applicable to all code compliance enforcement tools oo Aims to reduce duplication and confusion between processes oo Introduces a couple new definitions and modifies some existing ones to enhance clarity and consistency in enforcement. 4930-6536-4232 v2 ITEM NO. 8.1). 2. Chapter 1.24: Administrative Citation Program (Currently Chapter 1.25) oo Moved ahead of the nuisance abatement process since the citation process is used more frequently oo Incorporates sections on administrative hearings and remedies for late or unpaid fines from current Chapters 1.26 and 1.27 0o Removes sections 1.24.050-1.24.100 relating to residential rental units and relocates them to Chapter 1.26 3. Chapter 1.25: Nuisance Abatement (Currently Chapter 1.24) oo Moved after the administrative citation program 0o Incorporates sections on nuisance abatement hearings and remedies from current Chapters 1.26 and 1.27 and relocates the collection procedures in Chapter 1.27 to the proposed Chapter 1.25 4. Chapter 1.26: Residential Rental Units (Currently within Chapter 1.24) 0o Created to house residential rental units code sections currently located in the middle of Chapter 1.24 oo Relocation aims to improve flow and coherence of the nuisance abatement chapter 0o No substantive changes proposed, only relocation and internal code reference updates The proposed ordinance also amends the current Chapter 1.27 to be "reserved" for future use, if necessary. Process Streamlining The revised Title 1 introduces changes to the Administrative Citation and Nuisance Abatement processes to improve efficiency in addressing nuisances. These changes are designed to ensure that violations are addressed in a fair, clear, and efficient manner while maintaining distinct processes for administrative citations and nuisance abatement. The current Administrative Citation process involves multiple notices prior to the citation notice, causing delays of over 40 days before the City can issue citations and collect fines for noncompliance. While City code compliance staff prioritize voluntary compliance and can extend the pre -citation notice period if progress is shown, it's crucial to have efficient tools for addressing violations. The proposed amendments to the administrative citation process will: oo Eliminate the 10-day preliminary notice period. oo Reduce the pre -citation notice period from 30 days to 15 days. 0o Clarify language about optional administrative citation appeal hearings, distinguishing them clearly from nuisance abatement appeal hearings. The current Nuisance Abatement process includes a preliminary notice before issuing a notice of violation and order to abate, which can delay addressing nuisances that pose serious health and safety risks. The proposed amendments eliminate the 10-day preliminary notice period. Additionally, the current code requires a hearing to confirm the nuisance. The proposed revisions remove that hearing requirement but still allow an appeal hearing if the offender contests the notice of violation. These 4930-6536-4232 v2 2 ITEM NO. 8.D. changes aim to reduce delays and improve efficiency while maintaining flexibility for compliance timelines tailored to specific cases. Updates to Align with State Law In 2021, California enacted SB 60, empowering local governments to impose fines for violations of short-term rental ordinances. Rohnert Park's current ordinance (17.07.020(KK)) prohibits short-term rentals citywide, with one exception: a single bedroom within a primary dwelling unit may be rented short-term with a permit from the City's planning division. Although illegal short-term rentals are not currently a widespread issue in Rohnert Park, staff recommends updating Title 1, Chapter 1.16 to incorporate the new state -authorized fines. This proactive measure will prepare the City for potential future challenges. Under the new state law, violations of Rohnert Park's short-term rental ordinance will incur the following fines: 1. First violation: Up to $1,500 2. Second violation within one year: Up to $3,000 3. Each additional violation within one year of the first: Up to $5,000 These updates provide the City with stronger enforcement tools if short-term rental violations become more prevalent. Please note that, due to the number of revisions and reorganization of code sections, a redlined version of the proposed amendments to Title 1 will not be included as an attachment to this staff report. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: The proposed action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed ordinance is not a "project" within the meaning of Section 15378 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it has no potential to result in physical changes to the environment, either directly or indirectly. If the ordinance is found to be a "project" within the meaning of section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, the amendments are exempt under section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. Finally, the fee provisions of the proposed ordinance do not constitute a project under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4), which says that the creation of government funding mechanisms that do not involve a commitment to a particular project do not fall under the auspices of CEQA. STRATEGIC PLAN AND COUNCIL GOALS/PRIORITIES ALIGNMENT: The proposed action is consistent with the City's goals to improve neighborhood quality, deliver high - quality services and enhance community well-being. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: None. Adopting the proposed amendments to Rohnert Park Municipal Code Chapters 1.16 (General Penalty), 1.24 (Nuisance Abatement), 1.25 (Administrative Citation Program), 1.26 (Administrative Hearings), and 1.27 (Collection Procedures) and adding a new chapter 1.23 (Nuisance Defined) is consistent with City Council's action to introduce the ordinance. 4930-6536-4232 v2 ITEM NO. 8.D. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: The proposed amendments to Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code have no direct impact on the City's General Fund. However, they enhance the City's ability to recover nuisance abatement costs through mechanisms such as liens and special assessments, ensuring that expenses incurred by the City are reimbursed and reducing the fiscal burden on public resources. Additionally, the amendments include updates to the fine and fee schedule in alignment with SB 60, which authorizes cities to increase penalties for short-term rental violations. Department Head Approval Date: N/A Finance Approval Date: N/A Human Resources Approval Date: N/A City Attorney Approval Date: 1/15/2025 City Manager Approval Date: 1/16/2025 Attachments: Ordinance 986, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park, California, Amending Chapters 1.16 (General Penalty), 1.24 (Nuisance Abatement), 1.25 (Administrative Citation Program), 1.26 (Administrative Hearings) and 1.27 (Collection Procedures) and adding a new Chapter 1.23 (Nuisance Defined) within Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code Rohnert Park Municipal Code Title 1 to streamline the administrative citation and nuisance abatement processes and increasing fines for short-term rental violations. a. Exhibit A — Amendments to RPMC Chapters 1.16 (General Penalty), 1.24 (Nuisance Abatement), 1.25 (Administrative Citation Program), 1.26 (Administrative Hearings), and 1.27 (Collection Procedures), and adding a new Chapter 1.23 (Nuisance Defined) — CLEAN 4930-6536-4232 v2 4 ORDINANCE NO.986 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 1.16 (GENERAL PENALTY); 1.24 (NUISANCE ABATEMENT); 1.25 (ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION PROGRAM); 1.26 (ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS); AND 1.27 (COLLECTION PROCEDURES) AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 1.23 (NUISANCE DEFINED) WITHIN TITLE 1 OF THE ROHNERT PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO STREAMLINE THE ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION AND NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROCESS AND INCREASING FINES FOR SHORT TERM RENTAL VIOLATIONS WHEREAS, the City of Rohnert Park has undertaken a comprehensive review of Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code (RPMC) related to tools used by the city code compliance staff; and WHEREAS, the current structure of Title 1 presents several challenges due to the placement of the administrative citation process, which is situated between two sections that describe the nuisance abatement process, and numerous cross-references between chapters make it difficult to distinguish between the two distinct processes, which leads to confusion among staff and the public; and WHEREAS, additionally, both the administrative citation and nuisance abatement processes involve lengthy pre -noticing requirements, which can impede staff s ability to address nuisances efficiently; and WHEREAS, in 2021, California enacted SB 60, empowering local governments to impose increased fines for violations of short-term rental ordinances; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments aim to reorganize key chapters, by reducing redundancies, streamlining compliance processes, and ensuring consistency with state laws including SB 60; and WHEREAS, at the February 14, 2023 City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to amend Title 1 to streamline the processes and improve clarity and readability for both staff and the public; and WHEREAS, the City's General Penalty provisions are currently set forth in Chapter 1.16 of Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City's rules and regulations for Nuisance Abatement are currently set forth in Chapter 1.24 of Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City's rules and regulations for Administrative Citations are currently set forth in Chapter 1.25 of Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City's rules and regulations for Administrative Hearings are currently set forth in Chapter 1.26 of Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City's rules and regulations for Collection Procedures are currently set forth in Chapter 1.27 of Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City desires to better consolidate and update its codes, and streamline compliance and abatement processes pertaining to nuisance conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park as follows: Section 1. Validity. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein. Section 2. Findings. The City Council finds: 1. That the proposed amendments to the Rohnert Park Municipal Code will contribute to the public health, safety and welfare, by reduce redundancies, streamline compliance processes, and ensure consistency with state laws including SB 60; 2. That this ordinance is enacted in compliance with Business and Professions Code Sections 22435.8 and pursuant to authority in Government Code Section 37100 to pass ordinances not in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the State or the United States; and 3. Enforcement of city ordinances is an essential government function and necessary to adequately protect the public health and safety. The proposed amendments to Rohnert Park Municipal Code chapters 1.16, 1.24, 1.25, 1.26 and 1.27 and new chapter 1.23 will ensure the continued prevention, detection, investigation and enforcement of violations of ordinances regulating public health, safety, and welfare, public works, business activities and consumer protection, building standards, land -use, and other municipal affairs in a manner consistent with applicable law. Section 3. Environmental Review. The City Council finds: 1. That adoption of this ordinance is not a "project" within the meaning of Section 15378 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it has no potential to result in physical changes to the environment, either directly or indirectly; and 2. If the ordinance is found to be a "project" within the meaning of Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, the amendments would be exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment; and 3. That the fee provisions of the proposed ordinance do not constitute a project under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), which says that the creation of government funding mechanisms that do not involve a commitment to a particular project do not fall under the auspices of CEQA. Section 4. Amendment. The City Council hereby amends the current Rohnert Park Municipal Code Chapters 1.16 (General Penalty), 1.24 (Nuisance Abatement), 1.25 (Administrative Citation Program), 1.26 (Administrative Hearings), and 1.27 (Collection Procedures) within Title 1 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code by repealing and replacing them with Chapters 1.16 (General Penalty), 1.24 (Administrative Citation Program), 1.25 (Nuisance Abatement), 1.26 (Residential Rental Units), 1.27 (Reserved) and adding a new chapter 1.23 (Nuisance Defined) to read in their entirety as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto. Ordinance No. 986 Page 2 of 3 All other chapters within Title I of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code not specifically identified herein shall remain unchanged. Section 5. Actions to Effectuate and Codification. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to take other actions on behalf of City, which are not expressly and specifically reserved for the City Council, to implement and effectuate this ordinance. The City Clerk is directed to codify this ordinance in a manner which best reflects the legislative intent of the City Council in enacting this ordinance. The City Clerk is directed to resolve any numbering conflicts accordingly. Section 6. Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effective no less than 30 days after its adoption, and shall be published or posted as required by law. Section 8. Publication. The City Clerk is directed to cause this ordinance to be published in the manner required by law. This Ordinance was introduced by the Council of the City of Rohnert Park on January 14, 2025 and DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED on this 28th of January, 2025, by the following Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Sylvia Lopez Cuevas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Gerard Giudice, Mayor Ordinance No. 986 Page 3 of 3 Title 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter 1.16 GENERAL PENALTY 1.16.010 Violations; misdemeanors and infractions; acts include causing, aiding and abetting. A. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of, or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this code or any ordinance of the city. Any person who violates or fails to comply with any provision of this code or any city ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor, unless the violation is specifically identified in this code as an infraction. For those violations specifically identified as misdemeanors in this code, an arresting officer may choose to issue a citation for an infraction rather than a misdemeanor in any one of the following instances: 1. The violator identifies himself or herself to the arresting officer, produces government -issued identification to the arresting officer and the arresting officer is able to verify the authenticity of such identification; or 2. The violator ceases or otherwise abates the violation after receiving notice of such violation; or 3. The violator has not previously been convicted of violating the same provision of this code within two years of the currently charged violation; or 4. There is no need to book the violator. C. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this code, any such violation constituting a misdemeanor under this code may, in the discretion of the attorney having prosecutorial functions, be charged and prosecuted as an infraction. D. Except in cases where a different punishment is specifically prescribed elsewhere in this code, every misdemeanor offense shall be punishable by imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months, or by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the court. E. An infraction is punishable by: A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation; A fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation of the same code provision within a twelve-month period; A fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for each additional violation of the same code provision within a twelve-month period. 4. An offense, which would otherwise be an infraction, is a misdemeanor if a person has been convicted of three or more violations of the same code provision within a twelve-month period. For the purpose of this subsection, a bail or bond forfeiture or plea of nolo contendere is considered a conviction of the offense charged. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 1 of 29 Notwithstanding subsection E above, an infraction of any local building and safety code enacted under Title 15 of this code is punishable by: 1. A fine not exceeding one hundred thirty dollars ($130) for a first violation; 2. A fine not exceeding seven hundred dollars ($700) for a second violation of the same code provision within a twelve-month period; 3. A fine not exceeding one thousand three hundred dollars ($1,300) for each additional violation of the same code provision within a twelve-month period; or 4. A fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars (2,500) for each additional violation of the same ordinance within two years of the first violation if the property is a commercial property that has an existing building at the time of the violation and the violation is due to failure by the owner to remove visible refuse or failure to prohibit unauthorized use of the property. 5. An offense, which would otherwise be an infraction, is a misdemeanor if a person has been convicted of three or more violations of the same code provision within a twelve-month period. For the purpose of this subsection, a bail or bond forfeiture or plea of nolo contendere is considered a conviction of the offense charged. G. Notwithstanding subsection E above, a violation of Section 17.07.020 (KK), relating to Short -Term Rentals that is an infraction is punishable by the following: A fine not exceeding one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for a first violation. A fine not exceeding three thousand dollars ($3,000) for a second violation of the same ordinance within one year. A fine not exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000) for each additional violation of the same ordinance within one year of the first violation. 4. For purposes of this subsection, "short-term rental' shall be defined as described in Section 17.04.030. For purposes of this subsection, the term "short-term rental' shall not include a commercially operated hotel, motel, bed and breakfast inn, or a time-share property as defined by subdivision (aa) of Section 11212 of the Business and Professions Code. The fine limits set by this subsection apply only to infractions that pose a threat to public health or safety. The fines described in this subsection shall not apply to a first-time offense of failure to obtain a permit or pay a business license fee. H. An infraction is not punishable by imprisonment. Fines for infractions shall be subject to reduction upon the submission of a hardship waiver and a showing by the responsible party that the responsible party has made a bona fide effort to comply after the first violation and that payment of the full amount of the fine would impose an undue financial burden on the responsible party. Whenever in this code any act or omission is made unlawful, it shall include maintaining, causing, permitting, aiding or abetting any such act or omission. Each such person shall be charged with a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which a violation of any provision of this code is committed, continued or permitted by such person, and shall, upon conviction, be punishable accordingly. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 2 of 29 1.16.020 Additional —Alternative remedy. In addition to or in lieu of the remedies provided in the preceding Section 1.16.010, General penalty, the city attorney may commence an action for abatement, including, but not limited to, an injunction thereof, in the manner required by law and shall take such other steps to obtain such relief as will abate or remove a violation and restrain an enjoin any person from violating any provisions of this code, or other applicable laws and rules and regulations. All costs, including attorney's fees, for the abatement of a violation of this code which constitutes a public nuisance is assessed against any property declared to be a public nuisance and the costs, including attorney's fees, shall be collected in the manner provided for by Government Code Section 38773.5. Chapter 1.23 NUISANCE DEFINED 1.23.010 Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of this chapter is to define public nuisances and the procedures the city of Rohnert Park may use to remedy the violations, including abatement. These procedures are vital for promoting the health, safety, economic, aesthetic and general welfare of the citizens of the city, and to protect neighborhoods against property -related nuisances, blight and deterioration by establishing requirements for all buildings, whether residential or non-residential, or structures of whatever kind, and establishing requirements for the maintenance of all land, whether improved or vacant. The city of Rohnert Park has a history and reputation for well -kept properties. Property values and the general welfare of the community are founded, in part, upon the appearance and maintenance of private properties. Owners and occupants of some properties within the city permit conditions to exist which are below the minimum conditions required by this chapter and therefore injurious and detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare of residents of the city and contribute substantially and increasingly to the deterioration of residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. Resolution and/or abatement of conditions that do not meet the standards required by the Rohnert Park Municipal Code (hereinafter, "code") will promote the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the city because maximum use and enjoyment of property in close proximity to other property depends upon maintenance of both properties. This chapter, as well as the three immediately following this one (Chapters 1.24, 1.25 and 1.26), shall apply to all buildings, structures and land within the city without regard to use, date of construction or alterations and are enforced uniformly. Chapters 1.24 and 1.25 establish procedures for enforcement of the code and to seek corrective action for, and/or abate any and all other public nuisances, whether property related or not, which the city has declared to be injurious to the public health, comfort, convenience, safety, welfare, prosperity, peace and quiet of the city and its inhabitants. There are three general remedies used for enforcement of code violations: A. Administrative citations, as described in Chapter 1.24, are utilized to impose fines on property owners or occupants to address violations of any section of this code. B. Nuisance abatement, as described in Chapter 1.25, is utilized for ongoing and/or significant violations which require formal city intervention to abate the violations. C. Summary abatement, as described in Section 1.25.160, is reserved for conditions or use of property that constitute an imminent or immediate danger to the health and safety of the public. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 3 of 29 The foregoing remedies provided in this chapter shall be cumulative and not exclusive. The city is empowered to take all necessary actions to ensure the standards outlined in this code are met and maintained. This chapter, as well as Chapters 1.24, 1.25 and 1.26, grant the city broad authority to enforce compliance through any available legal remedy necessary to address violations of any section of the code and protect the public's health, safety and welfare. 1.23.020 Definitions. A. "Administrative hearing" means a formal proceeding before an administrative hearing officer or appeal board, where evidence and arguments are presented to resolve disputes regarding code violations or enforcement actions. B. "Animal" means all nonhuman members of the animal kingdom, including domestic, wild, exotic and livestock species. C. "Building" and "structure" means anything which is built or constructed, or which is used or intended for sheltering any use or occupancy, and includes, but is not limited to, any house, garage, carport, duplex, apartment, condominium, mobile home, storage shed, any commercial establishment, warehouse, fence, wall, or other object affixed to or upon real property, or any assemblage of materials on the property of another for the purpose of human habitation. D. "Chronic nuisance" refers to any property on which multiple violations of the municipal code or other laws occur within one year, indicating a persistent pattern of disregard for public health, safety, and welfare. E. "City" means the area within the territorial city limits of the city of Rohnert Park and all territory outside the city over which the city has jurisdiction by virtue of any constitutional or charter provisions, or any ordinance or law. F. "City clerk" means the city clerk of the City of Rohnert Park or their designee. G. "City council" means the city council as the legislative body of the city. H. "City manager' means the city manager, the assistant city manager, or any person or persons designated by the city manager to act in their stead in connection with this chapter. I. "Code compliance officer' is synonymous with "code enforcement officer" and means any person designated by California Penal Code § 829.5, this code or by the city manager to enforce the provisions of this code. Such employees may be employed in any city department. J. "Compliance period" period of time provided by the compliance officer to the responsible party to correct code violations. K. "Debt" means money, property or other assets which are due or owing or alleged to be due or owing. L. "Debtor' means any person owing debt. M. "Decision maker' means the hearing officer or appeal board designated to preside over administrative hearings in accordance with Chapters 1.24 and 1.25. N. "Driveway" as defined in this chapter is a paved surface that leads to a residential garage or carport. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 4 of 29 O. "Durable surface" as defined in this chapter shall consist of concrete, asphalt, permanently fitted stone or masonry pavers, or other durable material as may be approved by the city. "Summary abatement" refers to immediate actions taken by the city to correct or remove any condition that poses an imminent threat to public health or safety. The summary abatement process is described in Section 1.25.160. Q. "Enforcement action" means either an administrative citation issued under Chapter 1.24 or a notice of violation and order to abate issued under Chapter 1.25, summary abatement under Chapter 1.25 or referral to the city attorney's office. "Fee" means a charge for services provided or a benefit conferred. "Fine" means a sum imposed as punishment for an offense. T. "Habitability standards" refer to the minimum requirements for a property to be considered safe, livable, and in compliance with this code and other applicable codes including but not limited to California Health and Safety Code 17920.3 and 17920.10, California Civil Code § 1941 and § 1941.1 Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 22, § 81088(a-e), and the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) as adopted herein. U. "Hazard" means any condition, circumstance, or substance that poses a present or potential risk to human health, safety, property, or the environment. This includes, but is not limited to, hazardous materials as defined in the California Health and Safety Code Section 25501(n), fire hazards as described in the California Fire Code (Title 24, Part 9), and natural hazards such as seismic and flood risks regulated under the California Building Code (Title 24, Part 2) and Government Code Sections 65302(g) and 8589.5 and other conditions determined by the Compliance Officer to pose a present or potential risk to human health, safety, property, or the environment, even if not explicitly listed herein. V. "Immediate hazard or threat" means a condition or situation that poses an immediate danger to the environment or to human health, life, or safety, or the declaration of an intention or the ability to cause harm, danger or risk to the safety of persons or property. This includes, but is not limited to, any hazards or other substances that, due to its quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or potential hazard to human health, safety, or the environment. W. "Inoperative vehicle" means any vehicle that cannot operate safely or legally upon the street or highways of the state and includes any vehicle that does not have current valid registration. With respect to a motor vehicle, in addition to the foregoing, inoperative vehicle means a vehicle that is not then capable of self -propulsion. X. "Motor vehicle" and "vehicle" shall have the same meanings as defined in California Vehicle Code Sections 415 and 670, as may be amended from time to time. Y. "Owner" and "property owner" as used in chapters 1.23, 1.24 and 1.25, and unless otherwise required by the context, shall mean the owner or owners of record of real property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll of Sonoma County, or as otherwise known to the city manager or their designee by virtue of more recent and reliable information. With regard to animals, an "owner" or "owner/guardian" means any person who keeps or has charge of or provides custody or care to an animal. This definition shall exclude veterinarians who are treating or caring for an animal in the regular practice of veterinary medicine as well as the owners or operators of an animal grooming business, kennel or pet shop while engaged in the EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 5 of 29 regular practice of such business. Use of the term "owner/guardian" in place of "owner" shall not imply or bestow any change in legal status or ownership of animals by the use of such term. Z. "Penalty" means the punishment imposed on a wrongdoer, usually in the form of imprisonment or a fine. AA. "Person" means any natural person, firm, association, business or organization, corporation, partnership, trust, estate, or any other legal entity recognized by law as the subject of legal rights or duties. BB. "Property" means any parcel of land which is identified in the secured roll of the Sonoma County assessor; all residential, commercial and other real property, including, but not limited to, front yards, side yards, backyards, driveways, walkways, alleys and sidewalks, and shall include any vehicle, object, vegetation, building or structure, whether fixed or moveable, located on such property. CC. "Public nuisance" means any act, condition or activity declared to be a nuisance by the provisions of this code, or under California Civil Code Sections 3479 and 3480, or at common law or in equity jurisprudence that is injurious to health, indecent, offensive to the senses, or obstructs the free use of property, interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property. In addition, a nuisance is hereby declared to include any violation of this code, and any condition of property that renders any property within the city of Rohnert Park harmful to property or persons who may occupy, go upon, or are proximal to such property. DD. "Responsible party" means any owner, occupant, lessor, lessee, manager, employer, licensee, or other person or entity having control over a building or structure, parcel of land, or place of business. A responsible party may be a property owner, either individually or concurrently with additional responsible parties. If the responsible party is a minor, the parents(s) or guardian(s) shall be deemed the responsible party. "Responsible party" may also be referred to as offender. EE. "Vehicle owner" shall have the same meaning as the legal owner and/or registered owner as those terms are defined in the California Vehicle Code Sections 370 and 505, as may be amended from time to time. FF. "Violation" means a breach of any provision of this code by any property owner or any responsible party, or the creation or maintenance of any public nuisance by such owner or responsible party. GG. "Visual blight" means any unreasonable or unlawful condition or use of premises or of a building exterior which by reason of its appearance from the public right-of-way or from neighboring premises, is detrimental to the surrounding area and the property of others, or is detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of individuals residing within the community. This includes, but is not limited to, abandoned or partially destroyed buildings, unpainted structures, broken or missing doors and windows, accumulation of litter or debris, and overgrown vegetation. It also includes conditions contributing to the decay or decline of neighborhoods, such as unsafe buildings, unmaintained properties, and other factors as outlined in California Health and Safety Code Section 33031. 1.23.030 Nuisances. It shall be unlawful and declared a public nuisance for any responsible party to maintain property in such a manner that allows any of the following conditions to exist thereon, which are deemed to be a public nuisance: EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 6 of 29 A. Any hazard, as defined in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, Title 15 of this code or Section 1.23.020; Refuse and/or waste matter which by reason of its location and character creates such a condition of deterioration that it constitutes visual blight, reduces the aesthetic appearance of the neighborhood, is offensive to the senses, or detrimentally affects property in the surrounding neighborhood or community; C. Polluted or stagnant water which, because of its nature or location, constitutes an unhealthy or unsafe condition; D. Maintenance of property that is so out of harmony or conformity with the maintenance standards of adjacent properties, or in such condition of deterioration or disrepair that it causes visual blight, including, but not limited to: Buildings or structures which are abandoned, partially destroyed, damaged, boarded up, dilapidated or left in a persistent state of partial construction. A "persistent state of partial construction" refers to any unfinished building where active construction is not occurring, or where the appearance or other conditions of such unfinished building or structure constitutes visual blight, or reduces the aesthetic appearance of the neighborhood, or is offensive to the senses, or is detrimental to nearby properties. Any building(s), structure(s) or property that are damaged, hazardous, broken, warped, dry rotted, blighted, infested, unsightly, unmaintained, decayed, defective, deteriorated, unsafe, dilapidated, in a state of disrepair, unsanitary, unfit for human habitation, in a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease or likely to cause injury to the health, safety or general welfare of those living, working, accessing or occupying within. Any building or portion thereof which is unpainted, or where the condition of existing paint has become so deteriorated as to permit substantial decay, checking, cracking, peeling, chalking, dry rot, warping, or termite infestation. 4. Buildings with missing doors, or windows containing broken glass or no glass at all where the window is a type which normally contains glass. Plywood or other materials used to cover such window space or doors, if permitted under this code, shall be painted in a color or colors compatible with the remainder of the building. 5. Building exteriors, walls, fences, gates, driveways, sidewalks, walkways, or alleys which for at least twenty-four consecutive hours are maintained in such condition as to become so defective, unsightly, or in such a condition of deterioration or disrepair that the same constitutes visual blight or reduces the aesthetic appearance of the neighborhood, is offensive to the senses, or is detrimental to nearby properties. 6. The accumulation, for twenty-four consecutive hours or more, of dirt, litter, or debris in vestibules, doorways, or the adjoining sidewalks, passages, or breezeways of a building. 7. Any appliance, tool, equipment, furniture, furnishing, or other item of personal property not normally kept outside including, but not limited to, any couch, love seat, sofa, sofa bed, recliner, hassock, upholstered chair, mattress, bed springs, box springs, bed frame, headboard, desk, dresser, bureau, cabinet, television, radio, stereo, stove, refrigerator, freezer, dishwasher, washing machine, dryer, shopping cart(s), sink, toilet, or similar items, whether or not any such item is broken or abandoned, resting or being stored on the premises stored either (a) so as to be visible from a public street, alley, or from any adjoining EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 7 of 29 property for at least twenty-four consecutive hours, or (b) so as otherwise to constitute a harborage for rodents or pests or a detriment to health, safety and welfare of nearby properties, the neighborhood or the city. Attractive nuisances dangerous to children and other persons, including, but not limited to, broken or neglected household appliances, equipment, machinery or vehicles; unfenced, abandoned, uncovered, unprotected, or otherwise unmaintained wells, swimming pools, spas, ponds, excavations or other openings; and open and accessible structures, whether vacant, abandoned or not. Construction or packing materials or supplies, including, but not limited to, lumber, drywall, roofing tile, cement, nails, pallets, plywood, scrap lumber, or other building materials, products, or supplies; electrical, irrigation, or plumbing supplies; provided, however, that a reasonable quantity of these materials and supplies is excluded from this definition during active construction authorized by a valid building permit upon the subject property. A project shall be deemed active if there is obvious change to the accumulation or to the project in any seven-day period. 10. Construction equipment or machinery of any type or description parked or stored on property for at least twenty-four consecutive hours where it is readily visible from a public street, alley, or adjoining property, except while active excavation, construction or demolition operations authorized by a valid building permit are in progress on the subject property or an adjoining property, or where the property is zoned for the storage of construction equipment or machinery. 11. An accumulation of aluminum cans, newspapers, plastic bottles, glass, cardboard or cardboard boxes, or an accumulation of other recyclable materials that has been stored in public view for at least twenty-four consecutive hours and is visible from a public street, alley or from any adjoining property. 12. Maintenance of land, the topography, geology or configuration of which, whether in a natural state or as a result of grading operations, excavation or fill, causes erosion, subsidence, or surface water drainage problems of such magnitude as to be injurious or potentially injurious to the public health, safety and welfare or to adjacent properties. 13. Maintenance of any structures, bins or containers used for the collection of donated objects or items on any public or private property, unless completely enclosed within a permitted building or otherwise permitted and approved by the city's development services department. 14. Maintenance of any signage which lacks a required permit, or is prohibited pursuant to Section 17.27.060 of this code. 15. Storage of any abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, inoperative, salvaged or disabled vehicle, vessel, equipment trailer, house trailer, camper, camper shell, boat, boat trailer, airplane or other mobile equipment, or parts thereof, stored or parked in front yards, side yards, backyards, driveways, sidewalks or walkways for at least twenty-four consecutive hours and visible from a public street or any adjoining property. 16. Parking a vehicle in any required front yard or side yard setback upon any residential property, except upon a driveway, within an approved garage or carport, or upon another durable surface in conformity with applicable requirements in this code, including Section 17.16.080 of this code; parking a vehicle on any commercial property except on a paved EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 8 of 29 surface, or upon an unimproved lot or parcel in any zone, or in violation of Chapter 17.16 of this code. 17. Firewood longer than thirty-six inches in length and greater than twenty-four inches in diameter; firewood shall only be maintained in stacks located within side or rear yard areas where such stacks maintain a minimum of eighteen inches clearance from the ground. 18. Trees, vegetation or landscaping allowed to remain upon the property for at least twenty-four consecutive hours that: a. Is dead, decayed, diseased, dry, overgrown, uncultivated, hazardous; b. Harbors or is likely to harbor such nuisances as trash or debris or infestations such as vermin, rats or insects; C. Is in a condition that causes visual blight, or reflects a lack of being maintained in an ongoing manner; d. Constitutes a fire or health hazard, or creates a threat to the public health or welfare; e. Is maintained with less than eight feet of vertical clearance from sidewalks and fourteen feet of vertical clearance from streets, or obscures official street or traffic signage; or f. Consists of thorn or spine -bearing vegetation immediately adjacent to sidewalks in residential areas. 19. Maintaining property in such a manner as to cause a hazard to the public by obscuring visibility of vehicular or pedestrian traffic at intersections, parkways, sidewalks and any other rights -of -way or blocks clear vision triangles required by Section 17.14.040 of this code. 20. The placement of clotheslines in front yards and the drying of laundry or washed articles on front porch stair railings, or the placement of washed articles on fences, hedges, or other supporting structures located in front yards for the purpose of drying them where the foregoing are visible from any public street, alley, or from any adjoining property. 21. Any wall, sign, fence, gate, hedge, or structure maintained in such a condition of deterioration or disrepair as to constitute a hazard to persons or property, constitute a visual blight, reduce the aesthetic appearance of the neighborhood, is offensive to the senses, or is detrimental to nearby properties. 22. Any property with pooled oil accumulation, oil flowing onto public rights -of -way or adjacent property, or excessive accumulations of grease or oil on paved surfaces, buildings, walls, or fences. 23. Any yard area, visible from a public street, alley or from any adjoining property, the non - maintenance of which causes excessive dust or discharge of material onto the public right-of- way or into the storm drain system; which contains the accumulation of debris, constitutes visual blight, reduces the aesthetic appearance of the neighborhood, is offensive to the senses, or is detrimental to nearby properties. This paragraph shall not be construed to require the use of water or the installation of drought -resistant vegetation to the tenant landscaping during any period in which a drought has been officially declared. 24. Any graffiti or markings, including paint, ink, chalk, dye, etchings, or similar marking substances, which remains on the exterior of any building or structure, wall, fence, pavement, window, vehicle, walkway or other object, the color of which significantly differs from the EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 9 of 29 original surface, for at least twenty-four consecutive hours and is visible from a public street, alley or any adjoining property. 25. The keeping, storing, depositing or accumulation on the premises of dirt, sand, gravel, concrete, or other similar materials that constitutes visual blight, reduces the aesthetic appearance of the neighborhood, is offensive to the senses, or is detrimental to nearby properties, except when used for active excavation, construction or demolition projects for which a valid building permit, if so required, has been obtained. 26. The storage or placement of any garbage can or refuse container where such can or container is visible from a public right-of-way, other than between the hours of six p.m. of the day preceding collection day and six a.m. of the day following collection day. Where no complying storage location exists, garbage cans and refuse containers may be allowed to be placed in a manner that is removed from, yet remaining visible to, the public right-of-way. 27. Failure to maintain required trash enclosures pursuant to Section 17.12.130 of this code for multiple family, commercial and industrial uses. 28. Maintaining trash enclosures in a manner that is unsightly or causes hazardous conditions. 29. Buildings, uses or conditions that: Violate any mandatory provisions of the building and construction code as adopted by the city in Title 15; Violate the California Health and Safety Code, including but not limited to Section 17920.3; C. Violate any mandatory provisions of the city's zoning code as contained in Title 17; or d. Violate any other provision of local, state or federal law relating to health, safety or environmental protection. 30. Any obstructions, impediments, or excavations that interfere with the ordinary use by the public of any public street, way or sidewalk except when and as permitted pursuant to this code or state law; 31. Maintenance of any insects, including, but not limited to bees, whether wild or domestic; hornets, or wasps on any property in such a manner as to pose a threat, disturbance, danger, or menace to any person or property of another. 32. Storage, keeping, operating or maintaining any equipment, machinery, vehicle, liquid or solid waste or any other device, which emits an objectionable odor or by reason of its dust, exhaust or fumes that creates a health or safety hazard to any person(s) or which causes discomfort or annoyance to reasonable persons of normal sensitivity, or otherwise violates Section 17.12.040 of this code. 33. Maintenance of any type of illumination which directly shines onto adjacent or proximal properties causing substantial diminution of the enjoyment or use of such adjacent or proximal property, or otherwise violates Section 17.12.050 of this code. 34. Violation of any provision of Chapter 6.04 of this code pertaining to animal regulations. 35. Violation of noise standards pursuant to Chapter 9.44 or Section 17.12.030 of this code. 36. Maintenance of any required off-street parking space in such condition as to preclude its intended purpose for the temporary parking of vehicles. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 10 of 29 37. Maintaining any condition on the property in such a manner as to otherwise constitute a public nuisance not specifically listed herein for a period in excess of twenty-four hours. E. Construction work or grading without obtaining required governmental approvals and permits, or construction work or grading that does not comply with conditions of approval in required approvals or permits, or construction work or grading that is outside of the scope of work authorized in such approvals or permits. Each and every day or portion thereof that a violation of this code occurs or continues shall constitute a new, separate and distinct violation. 1.23.040 General enforcement authority and Right of Entry. A. Any compliance officer has the authority and powers necessary to gain compliance with the provisions of this code. These powers include the power to issue citations, inspect public and private property and use whatever judicial and administrative remedies are available under the code and applicable State law. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, whenever a compliance officer charged with the enforcement of this code determines that a violation of any provision has occurred, the compliance officer shall have the authority to issue an administrative citation in accordance with Chapter 1.24 to any responsible party for the violation, subject to the limitations contained in this chapter. Compliance officers are authorized to enter upon any property or premises within the city to ascertain whether the property or premises is in compliance with the code, and to make any inspection as may be necessary in the performance of their enforcement duties. These inspections may include the taking of photographs, samples or other physical evidence, and the making of video and/or audio recordings. Whenever it is necessary to make an inspection of any premises to enforce the provisions of this code, and to the extent authorized by law, a compliance officer may enter on such premises as necessary to inspect the same or to perform any duty imposed by this chapter, subject to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and any other provisions of applicable law. C. Whenever practicable, the compliance officer shall contact the occupant of the premises prior to entry and inform the occupant of the reasons for such entry onto the premises. If the occupant is other than the owner, the compliance officer shall also, when appropriate, contact such owner. If entry is obstructed by the owner or occupant, the compliance officer shall have recourse to every remedy provided by law to secure peaceable entry, including seeking an administrative inspection warrant pursuant to the procedures provided by California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1822.50 through 1822.59, as may be amended from time to time, or the successor provisions thereto. D. When a compliance officer or their designated representative has obtained an inspection warrant or other remedy provided by law to secure entry, no owner or occupant shall fail to promptly permit entry thereon by the compliance officer or their designated representative for the purposes permitted by this code. E. The procedures established in this chapter and in other chapters of this code as means for addressing violations of this code shall be in addition to criminal, civil or other legal or equitable remedies established by law that may be pursued alternatively or concurrently to address violations of this code. The use of this chapter and other chapters of this code shall be at the sole discretion of the city. 1.23.050 Decision maker at appeal hearing. EXHIBIT ATOORDINANCE NO.986 Page 11 of 29 A. Where an enforcement action includes a violation which concerns or relates to the application of building standards published in the California Building Standards Code, housing standards under the State Housing Law, or any applicable rule or regulation adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to State Housing Law, including standards relating to the use, maintenance, and change of occupancy of buildings and structures and requirements governing alteration, additions, repair, demolition, and moving of such buildings and structures, a person requesting an administrative appeal hearing shall be entitled to have that violation considered before the building appeals board pursuant to Section 15.04.070. B. All violations not subject to consideration by the building appeals board as set forth in subsection A and which are appealed, shall be considered by an administrative hearing officer designated by the city manager or the city manager's designee to preside over the administrative appeal hearing, which may include, but is not limited to, a person, firm, or corporation. C. Independent Authority. The employment, performance evaluation, compensation and benefits of the administrative hearing officer shall not be directly or indirectly conditioned upon the amount of the administrative fines or penalties upheld, awarded, imposed, or assessed by the administrative hearing officer. D. The city manager, or their designee, is authorized to develop and implement policies and procedures relating to the qualifications, appointment and compensation of administrative hearing officers; the powers of administrative hearing officers, and all other matters relating to conducting administrative appeal hearings as provided in this code. E. Powers. The decision maker shall have the power to: 1. Conduct administrative appeal hearings as provided under the authority of this code; 2. Continue a hearing based on good cause shown by one of the parties to the hearing or upon their own independent determination that due process has not been adequately afforded to a responsible party; 3. Exercise continuing jurisdiction over the subject matter of an administrative enforcement hearing or administrative appeal hearing; 4. Rule upon the merits of an administrative appeal hearing upon consideration of the evidence submitted and issue administrative orders resolving the case; 5. Uphold, award, impose, assess, modify or deny a fine or penalty authorized under this code; 6. Assess administrative costs according to proof; 7. Set, increase, or decrease, according to proof, the amount of fine or penalty or the daily rate of such fine or penalty sought by the city to be awarded, imposed, or assessed in those cases where the fine or penalty is not fixed but is subject to a range as otherwise established by this code; 8. In those cases where the fine or penalty is not fixed but is subject to a range as otherwise established by this code, determine the date certain upon which the assessment of civil penalties shall begin; and, where the corrections are subsequently completed to the city's satisfaction, the date certain upon which the assessment of civil penalties shall end. If the violations have not been so corrected, the daily accrual of the penalties assessed shall continue until the violations are corrected or the legal maximum limit is reached; and EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 12 of 29 9. Where appropriate in administrative enforcement actions and as a condition of compliance in correcting the violation(s) at issue; require each responsible party to cease violating this code and to make all necessary corrections as specified by the city. 1.23.060 Service of notices and appeal hearing procedure. A. General service of administrative citations and notices. The administrative citation and all notices shall be served on the responsible party in accordance with this section. Except as otherwise required by law, administrative citations and all written notices required to be given under the provisions of this chapter, chapter 1.24 and chapter 1.25 may be served by one of the following methods: By personal delivery; b. To the property owner, by mailing a copy of the notice by first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to their address shown on the last equalized assessment roll available on the date the notice is prepared, and to other responsible parties at their address as known to the city or at the property address. Service by mail shall be deemed to have been completed at the time of deposit in the United States mail; or C. Posting of the notice at the address shown on the last equalized assessment roll available or another conspicuous place on or near the property. Service of notices when responsible party cannot be located. If the compliance officer is unable to locate the responsible party for the violation at the property where the violation exists, then the notice shall be mailed to the responsible party in the manner described in this section and posted in a conspicuous place on or near the property. Giving notice in the manner provided for in this section shall be conclusively deemed to be adequate notice, and the failure of any person to see, read, understand or otherwise receive any notice required under this chapter shall not affect the validity of any proceedings undertaken under this chapter. C. Notice of appeal hearing. If an appeal is filed with the City in a timely manner with the requisite fee being paid, a notice of an administrative appeal hearing shall contain, at a minimum, the following: a. Date and time of hearing. b. Location of hearing. C. Name of the decision maker. Nature of the hearing. D. The notice shall be sent a minimum of ten days prior to the hearing to the appellant and any other responsible party. The decision maker may for good cause shown continue an administrative appeal hearing to another date or time upon request of the compliance officer or the person who filed the appeal. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 13 of 29 Chapter 1.24 ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION PROGRAM 1.24.010 Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of this chapter is to set forth a clear process by which the city may issue administrative citations, in addition to any and all other legal remedies, to address violations of any section of this code. 1.24.020 Applicability. A. Enforcement of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code (hereinafter, "code") throughout the city is an important public service and is vital to the protection of the public's health, safety and quality of life. A comprehensive code enforcement system uses a combination of judicial and administrative remedies to gain compliance with code regulations. This chapter outlines precise regulations that can be effectively applied in judicial and administrative proceedings and further establishes uniform procedures for the proper application of administrative code enforcement remedies and administrative hearings to resolve administrative code enforcement cases and appeals. It is the purpose and intent of this code to afford due process of law to any person who is directly affected by an administrative enforcement action. Due process of law includes adequate notice of the violation and enforcement remedy chosen by the city, an adequate explanation of the reasons justifying the administrative enforcement action taken by the city, and an opportunity to participate in the appropriate administrative enforcement or appeal hearing. These procedures are also intended to establish a forum to efficiently, expeditiously and fairly resolve issues raised by any administrative enforcement action. C. The administrative citations provided for in this chapter are an additional enforcement remedy to all other legal remedies, criminal or civil, which may be pursued by the city, to address any violation of this code or other public nuisance. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed a waiver of any other enforcement remedies found within this code. 1.24.030 Definitions. Unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary, the terms used in this chapter shall have the same meaning as provided for in Chapter 1.23 of this code. 1.24.040 Pre -citation notices —Correction period and notice. A. When the code violation(s) pertain to building, plumbing, electrical, or other similar structural or zoning issues that do not create an immediate danger to health or safety, the offender shall have a minimum of fifteen calendar days to correct or otherwise remedy the code violation, unless a shorter period of time is deemed necessary by the city to prevent or remedy an immediate threat to the health and safety of the public or occupants of a structure, prior to the issuance of an administrative citation and the imposition of a fine. A correction period longer than fifteen calendar days may be granted if deemed necessary by the compliance officer. B. For all other violations not relating to building, plumbing, electrical, or other similar structural or zoning issues that do not create an immediate danger to health or safety, the offender shall have a reasonable time period, as determined by the compliance officer, to correct or otherwise remedy the code violation. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 14 of 29 C. Upon discovery of code violation(s), the compliance officer shall issue a pre -citation notice to the offender and/or property owner in accordance with the provisions for service of notices set forth in Section 1.23.060 of this code. D. To the extent the following information is reasonably available to the compliance officer, the pre - citation notice shall: 1. State the date the pre -citation notice is issued; 2. State the date the violation(s) were discovered by the compliance officer; 3. State the offender's name, date of birth, driver's license number or State -issued identification number, physical description, and current residential address and/or mailing address; 4. State the address or provide a definite physical description of the location where the violation(s) occurred; 5. Reference the code section(s) violated and describe how the offender violated the code section(s); 6. Describe the action(s) necessary to correct the violation(s) and state the final compliance date by which time the correction must be made; 7. Include a statement that a failure to correct the violation(s) within the specified compliance date may result in an administrative citation being issued, and the amount of the fine to be imposed; 8. Provide a statement that if the violator believes the notice to be in error, that contact should be made with the compliance officer issuing the pre -citation notice to discuss the matter. The compliance officer may refer any such discussion to a supervisor or department director; 9. Include the name and signature of the compliance officer. E. At the end of the compliance period, the compliance officer shall inspect the site of the code violation. If the offender does not adequately correct the code violation(s) within the compliance period, or if the same violation reoccurs within twelve months from the date the pre -citation notice is issued, the compliance officer may immediately issue the offender an administrative citation pursuant to Section 1.24.050. 1.24.050 Administrative citation procedures —Generally. A. Issuance of Administrative Citation. The compliance officer, upon discovering that any responsible party, as defined in Section 1.23.020(DD) of this code (hereinafter referred to as "offender"), has committed a code violation(s) and at the end of the compliance period, may issue an administrative citation to the offender in the manner described in this chapter. The administrative citation shall be issued in accordance with provisions for service of notices set forth in Section 1.23.060 of this code. Contents of the Administrative Citation. To the extent the following information is reasonably available to the compliance officer, the administrative citation shall be issued in a form approved by the city manager, or their designee, and shall include: 1. The date the administrative citation is issued; 2. The date the violation(s) were discovered by the compliance officer; EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 15 of 29 The offender's name, date of birth, driver's license number or State -issued identification number, physical description, and current residential address and/or mailing address; 4. The address or a definite physical description of the location where the violation(s) occurred; 5. The code section(s) violated and describe how the offender violated the code section(s); 6. The amount of fine imposed for the violation(s); 7. Explanation of how the offender must pay the fine, including the location and manner, as well as the time period by which the fine must be paid and the consequences of failure to pay the fine; 8. An order prohibiting the continuation or repeated occurrence of the violation described in the administrative citation; 9. The administrative citation appeal process and procedure for obtaining an administrative appeal hearing. Specifically, notice that the offender must make a written request in the form and manner described upon the administrative citation within fifteen calendar days from the date the administrative citation is issued and that the offender will be notified by mail of the date of the hearing; 10. Include a warning that a failure to pay the fine or request and appear at an administrative hearing shall result in the penalties described in Section 1.24.060, including a description of the penalties; and 11. The name and signature of the compliance officer. C. Each and every day or portion thereof that a violation of this code occurs or continues shall constitute a new, separate and distinct violation subject to administrative citation and administrative fines or fees in accordance with this chapter. D. Voided or cancelled administrative citations. Administrative citations, once issued, shall only be voided or cancelled under the specific circumstances provided for herein: The compliance officer makes a significant error in preparing the administrative citation, such as an incorrect date, incorrect offender information, incorrect violations cited, or incorrect fine amount; The administrative citation is voided or cancelled by the hearing officer as part of an administrative order resulting from a hearing held pursuant to Section 1.23.060. Any individual ordering or otherwise voiding or cancelling an administrative citation under any circumstances not specifically provided for herein is guilty of a misdemeanor. 1.24.060 Administrative fines and penalties. Administrative fines or penalties may be provided in the form of a fine or penalty resolution established by the city council for specific individual violations or categories of violation. Where an administrative fine or penalty has not been established by resolution of city council for a specific violation or category of violations, the applicable administrative fine or penalty shall be the maximum fine amounts for infractions set forth in subdivision (b) of Government Code Section 36900. A. Payment. If the offender does not make a timely request for an appeal hearing with the required deposit as set forth in Section 1.24.070, he or she must pay the full amount designated on the administrative citation within twenty-one calendar days from the date the citation is issued. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 16 of 29 Payments of administrative fines shall be made in the manner and form directed on the administrative citation. If no such direction is provided, administrative fines shall be sent to the city's finance department. Failure to timely pay fines shall subject the offender to late charges in Section 1.24.110 of this code. In addition, willful failure to pay fines that are due shall, after sixty days of delinquency, constitute a separate violation chargeable as a misdemeanor. No Waiver. Under no circumstances shall the payment of the fine designated in the administrative citation constitute a waiver of the offender's right to a hearing. Therefore, an offender may pay the fine within the fifteen -day appeal period and also obtain a hearing to protest the imposition of the fine, provided that the offender makes a timely request for an appeal hearing. C. Obligation to Correct Violation. Nothing in this code shall be interpreted to mean that because an offender has paid the fine that they are not required to correct the code violation(s). Failure to correct the code violations may result in additional administrative citations. D. Refund of Payments. Any administrative citation fine, fee or penalty paid pursuant to subsection A of this section shall be refunded in accordance with Section 1.24.100(C)(1) if it is determined, after an appeal hearing, that the person charged in the administrative citation was not responsible for the violation, that there was no violation as charged in the administrative citation, or a modification to the amount owed was made. 1.24.070 Request for administrative citation appeal hearing. A. The offender may make a written request for an administrative citation appeal hearing ("hearing"), in the manner provided for on the citation form, within fifteen calendar days from the mailing or personal service date of the administrative citation. The offender may contest an administrative citation on the grounds that the violation did not occur, that the violation was corrected prior to issuance of the citation, or that they are not the responsible party with regard to the violation. A deposit in the same amount as the fine designated on the administrative citation must accompany the request for hearing and be filed with the City Clerk within fifteen calendar days from the mailing or personal service date of the administrative citation. Incomplete requests shall not be accepted. Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver. The city manager or their designee may waive the requirement of an advance deposit and issue the advance deposit hardship waiver only if the cited party submits a sworn declaration, in the manner provided for on the citation form, together with any supporting evidence demonstrating the person's actual financial inability to deposit the full amount of the fine in advance of the hearing. 1.24.080 Manner of conducting administrative citation appeal hearing. A. An administrative citation appeal hearing ("hearing") shall occur at the time and place designated in the notice of hearing, which shall be served in accordance with Section 1.23.060 of this code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no hearing to contest an administrative citation shall be held unless the fine has been deposited in advance in accordance with Section 1.24.070(A) or an advance deposit hardship waiver has been obtained in accordance with Section 1.24.070(B). B. The decision maker shall hear and consider all relevant evidence, including, but not limited to, applicable staff reports, oral, physical and documentary evidence regarding the alleged violation. C. Admission of evidence and the conduct of the hearing shall be controlled by the decision maker in accordance with the fundamentals of due process. The decision maker may, among other things, EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 17 of 29 set reasonable limits on the length of the hearing; limit the number of witnesses to testify for each side where their testimony would be unduly burdensome or cumulative or repetitive in nature; limit or exclude any abusive, argumentative, repetitive or otherwise irrelevant testimony; and place reasonable limits on the right to cross-examine and present evidence. D. The compliance officer shall bear the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that violation(s) of the code exist, or, in the case of administrative citations, that the violation(s) existed at the time the administrative citation was issued. E. The administrative citation and any report submitted by the compliance officer to the decision maker shall constitute prima facie evidence of the respective facts contained in those documents. F. Oral evidence may be given under on oath or affirmation. G. The responsible party may be represented by anyone of their choice or may represent themselves. H. The hearing is intended to be informal in nature. Formal rules of the California Evidence Code and discovery shall not apply. I. Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any direct evidence. 1.24.090 Failure to attend hearing. The failure to appear at a scheduled hearing without prior notice and request for continuance shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing. A person's failure to appear at the administrative hearing shall be presumed an admission to the violation indicated in the enforcement action, and such person will forfeit any fine deposit submitted. 1.24.100 Administrative decision following hearing. A. Issuance of Administrative Decision. After considering all of the testimony and evidence submitted at the hearing, within ten calendar days after the conclusion of the hearing, the decision maker shall issue a written decision in the form of an administrative order upholding, modifying, or cancelling the administrative citation. The decision maker shall state in the administrative decision the reasons for that decision, including the factual findings and conclusions made by the decision maker. The decision of the decision maker shall be final. Service of Administrative Decision. The administrative decision shall be served in accordance with Section 1.23.060 of this code. Copies of the administrative decision shall be sent to the property owner, responsible party, compliance officer and the city clerk. C. Refunds and Payments of Fines. If the decision maker determines that the administrative citation should be canceled or modified, then the city shall promptly refund the fine deposit, or modified portion thereof. If the decision maker determines that the administrative citation should be upheld or amended, the decision maker shall determine the amount of fine to be imposed. Any fine deposit shall be retained to meet the amount imposed. In cases of an approved hardship waiver, or outstanding fines or penalties, the decision maker shall specify a date by which the fine or penalty is to be paid to the city. D. Limitations on Filing Judicial Action. The administrative decision shall include a statement that the person may seek judicial review of the administrative order by doing one of the following: EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 18 of 29 If the administrative order imposes fines pursuant to an administrative citation, by filing a petition for review with the superior court in Sonoma County in accordance with the timelines and procedures specified in Government Code Section 53069.4. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.4, the appealing party shall serve a copy of the appeal notice in person or by first class mail upon the city. Appeal notices shall be sent to the city clerk. If no appeal notice is timely filed, the decision shall be final; or If the administrative order imposes other obligations, including requirements for abatement, by filing a petition for a writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5. The administrative order shall state that judicial review must be filed no later than ninety days after the date of the decision in accordance with the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6, any action appealing the city's final decision and order shall be commenced within ninety calendar days of the date the decision becomes final. 1.24.110 Remedies and collections process for late, unpaid fines, fees and penalties. A. Liability for late charges. Any person who fails to pay the city any fine, fee or penalty imposed pursuant to the provisions of this code on or before the date that the fine, fee or penalty is due shall be liable for the payment of any applicable late payment charges as set forth in the administrative fees and fines schedule as may be adopted by the city council, or as may otherwise be provided for in this code. Debt to city. All unpaid fines, fees and penalties, and late charges assessed shall be a debt to the city and subject to all remedies for debt collection allowed by law. C. Collection process. Any person who fails to pay the city any fine, fee, or penalty imposed pursuant to the provisions of this code on or before the date that the fine, fee, or penalty is due is subject to the collection process provided in this code. Whenever a notice is required to be given under this chapter, such notice may be given pursuant to the methods listed in Section 1.23.060. 3. A first notice of debt owed will be given to the debtor to pay all amounts owed to the city by the date indicated in the notice. 4. A second notice of debt owed will be given to the debtor if the amount owed is not paid by the date set in the first notice. The amount owed in the second notice will be owed by the date indicated in the notice. 5. If the amount owed to the city is not received by the date indicated in the second notice, the debt will be collected by use of all available legal means. 6. Failure to receive any notice specified in this code does not affect the validity of proceedings conducted hereunder. 7. Nothing in this section shall be intended to prohibit the city from referring an outstanding debt to a collection agency or from proceeding with any other method of debt collection available to the city by law. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 19 of 29 Chapter 1.25 NUISANCE ABATEMENT 1.25.010 Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of this chapter is to establish procedures to abate any and all other public nuisances, whether property related or not, which the city has declared to be injurious to the public health, comfort, convenience, safety, welfare, prosperity, peace and quiet of the city and its inhabitants. 1.25.020 Applicability. A. Enforcement of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code (hereinafter, "code") throughout the city is an important public service and is vital to the protection of the public's health, safety and quality of life. A comprehensive code enforcement system uses a combination of judicial and administrative remedies to gain compliance with code regulations. This chapter outlines precise regulations that can be effectively applied in judicial and abatement proceedings and further establishes uniform procedures for the proper application of nuisance abatement hearings and remedies to resolve code enforcement cases and appeals. It is the purpose and intent of this code to afford due process of law to any person who is directly affected by nuisance abatement action. Due process of law includes adequate notice of the violation and enforcement remedy chosen by the city, an adequate explanation of the reasons justifying the nuisance abatement action taken by the city, and an opportunity to participate in the appropriate enforcement or appeal hearing. These procedures are also intended to establish a forum to efficiently, expeditiously and fairly resolve issues raised by any nuisance abatement action. C. The nuisance abatement process provided for in this chapter is an additional enforcement remedy to all other legal remedies, criminal or civil, which may be pursued by the city, to address any violation of this code or other public nuisance. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed a waiver of any other enforcement remedies found within this code. 1.25.030 Definitions. Unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary, the terms used in this chapter shall have the same meaning as provided for in Chapter 1.23 of this code. 1.25.040 Notice of violation and order to abate. A. Whenever a compliance officer charged with the enforcement of any provision of this chapter determines that a violation of a provision of the code exists, the compliance officer shall have the authority to cause the owner and any responsible party to be notified that a violation of this chapter has not been abated and ordering such parties to abate the nuisance within a date specified. The notice of violation and order to abate shall contain the following information: The names and addresses of the owner and responsible parties, if any, in violation of this chapter and the street address, legal description or other description of the premises where the violation is located; A statement specifying the condition(s) which constitute a nuisance and the specific code section(s) which have been violated; EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 20 of 29 A statement that the owner and responsible parties, if any, had been previously notified of the violation and requested to correct it, 4. A statement that the recipient has ten calendar days from the date of the notice to voluntarily abate the nuisance, or if the compliance officer determines that ten calendar days is insufficient to abate the nuisance a statement specifying a date certain by which the nuisance must be abated; 5. A statement that if the responsible party fails to abate the nuisance within the time prescribed in the notice the city will abate the nuisance at the expense of the responsible parties and the costs of such abatement may be charged against the premises as a lien or special assessment; 6. A statement informing the recipient of their right to contest the compliance officer's determination during the nuisance abatement hearing by presenting evidence explaining why the premises should not be declared a nuisance and abated at the expense of the parties and/or why the costs of such abatement should not become a charge against the premises; and 7. A statement advising the owner that if legal action is instituted by either the owner or city in any manner relating to the abatement of the nuisance, the prevailing party may seek recovery of its costs and attorneys' fees. 8. The name, signature and department of the citing compliance officer. C. A copy of the notice provided for in this section shall be served upon the owner of the premises, any occupants of the premises and any other responsible party in the manner provided for in Section 1.23.060. D. The person giving such notice shall file a copy thereof in the office of the compliance officer together with an affidavit or certificate stating the time and manner in which such notice was given. The failure of any owner or other party to receive such notice shall not affect in any manner the validity of any proceedings taken hereunder. 1.25.050 Abatement by owner. The owner or responsible party may, at their own expense, (a) abate the nuisance in the time and manner presented in the notice of violation and order to abate or written determination of the hearing officer, whichever is applicable, or (b) prior to the scheduled hearing, abate a declared nuisance in accordance with the provisions of the notice of violation and order to abate issued in accordance with Section 1.25.040, provided that all necessary permits are first obtained. If a compliance officer determines that the nuisance has been properly abated, then proceedings pursuant to this chapter may be terminated, provided, however, that the city may in its discretion, proceed with recovery of such abatement costs, including incidental expenses, incurred by the city for administration, code enforcement or abatement by the city, as it may have incurred prior to abatement by the owner. Nothing in this chapter shall relieve any owner or other responsible party of the obligation of obtaining any required permit to do any work incidental to such abatement. 1.25.060 Abatement by the city —Debt of owner. A. In all cases where the city has determined to proceed with abatement, upon the date set forth for abatement of the nuisance in the notice and order or determination of the hearing officer, whichever is applicable, the city shall acquire jurisdiction to abate said condition at the expense of the owner and/or responsible party as herein provided. The city is authorized to cause the EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 21 of 29 nuisance to be abated by city forces or by private contract. To that end, the persons authorized to abate the nuisance may enter upon private property in a manner consistent with the United States and California Constitutions. Upon the abatement of such condition or any portion thereof by the city, all the expenses thereof shall constitute a civil debt owing to the city jointly and severally by the owner and/or responsible parties. The debt shall be collectible in the same manner as any other civil debt owing to the city and may be made a special assessment or lien upon the property pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 1.25.150. 1.25.070 Request for appeal hearing. A. The owner or responsible party may make a written request for an appeal hearing to appeal a notice of violation and order to abate in the manner provided for on the notice of violation and order to abate, within fifteen calendar days from the mailing or personal service date of the notice of violation and order to abate. The written request for an appeal hearing must be accompanied by a deposit of the entire amount of the fine, if a fine was imposed. The provisions of 1.24.070(B) relating to Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver shall apply to an appeal of a notice of violation and order to abate. 1.25.080 Manner of conducting appeal hearing. A. An appeal hearing for the appeal of a notice of violation and order to abate shall occur at the time and place designated in the notice of hearing. The decision maker shall hear and consider all relevant evidence, including, but not limited to, applicable staff reports, oral, physical and documentary evidence regarding the alleged violation. C. Admission of evidence and the conduct of the hearing shall be controlled by the decision maker in accordance with the fundamentals of due process. The decision maker may, among other things, set reasonable limits on the length of the hearing; limit the number of witnesses to testify for each side where their testimony would be unduly burdensome or cumulative or repetitive in nature; limit or exclude any abusive, argumentative, repetitive or otherwise irrelevant testimony; and place reasonable limits on the right to cross-examine and present evidence. D. The compliance officer shall bear the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that violation(s) of the code exist. E. Any notice of violation, administrative citation or report submitted by the compliance officer to the decision maker shall constitute prima facie evidence of the respective facts contained in those documents. F. Oral evidence may be given under on oath or affirmation. G. The responsible party may be represented by anyone of their choice or may represent themselves. H. The hearing is intended to be informal in nature. Formal rules of the California Evidence Code and discovery shall not apply. I. Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any direct evidence. 1.25.090 Failure to attend hearing. The failure to appear at a scheduled hearing without prior notice and request for continuance shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing. A person's failure to appear at the administrative hearing EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 22 of 29 shall be presumed an admission to the violation indicated in the enforcement action, and such person will forfeit any fine or fee submitted. 1.25.100 Decision following hearing. A. Issuance of Decision. After considering all of the testimony and evidence submitted at the hearing, within ten calendar days after the conclusion of the hearing of the appeal of the notice of violation and order to abate, the decision maker shall issue a written decision in the form of an administrative order upholding, modifying, or cancelling the notice of violation and order to abate. The decision maker shall state in the administrative decision the reasons for that decision, including the factual findings and conclusions made by the decision maker. The decision of the decision maker shall be final. B. Service of Decision. The decision shall be served in accordance with Section 1.23.060 of this code. Copies of the decision shall be sent to the property owner, responsible party, compliance officer and the city clerk. C. Order to abate. If the decision maker upholds the notice of violation and order to abate the nuisance, then the decision shall provide a date for abatement of the violations at such time as the hearing officer deems reasonable. If the violation implicates a First Amendment right, the order shall also provide that the order to abate is suspended until the responsible party exhausts or fails to exhaust any applicable judicial remedies. The abatement order shall further state that if the nuisance is not abated within the time provided, the nuisance shall be abated by the city at the parties' expense and the expenses may be made a lien or special assessment against the property. D. If the decision maker determines that the existing nuisance is likely to recur after the abatement, the owner may be directed to take adequate precautions for a period of time not to exceed twelve months so that the nuisance will not recur. E. Refunds and Payments of any fine. 1. If the decision maker determines that the notice of violation should be canceled, then the city shall promptly refund any deposited fine. 2. If the decision maker determines that the notice of violation and order to abate should be upheld or amended, the decision maker shall determine the amount of fine to be imposed. Any fine deposit shall be retained to meet the amount imposed. F. Limitations on Filing Judicial Action. The abatement order shall include a statement that the person may seek judicial review of the abatement order by filing a petition for a writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5. The abatement order shall state that judicial review must be filed no later than ninety days after the date of the decision in accordance with the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 1.25.110 Abatement cost records. A. Where the compliance officer is required to cause the abatement of a public nuisance pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, they shall keep or cause to be kept an accounting of the cost incurred, including all time spent by city and contract personnel in addressing and abating the nuisance, incidental expenses of such abatement, and attorney fees if the city elects, at the initiation of the abatement proceedings, to seek recovery of its own attorney fees. Upon conclusion of such abatement, the compliance officer shall submit an itemized statement of costs to the city clerk. Costs of abatement shall begin to run from the date of the notice to abate, except EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 23 of 29 in cases of summary abatement, in which case costs of abatement shall begin to run from the date the enforcement officer became aware of the nuisance requiring summary abatement. The city may seek to recover attorney fees incurred for an abatement action and related proceedings in those individual actions or proceedings in which the city elects, at the initiation of that individual action or proceeding, to seek recovery of its own attorney fees. If the city elects to seek recovery of its own attorney fees, attorney fees may be recovered by the prevailing party in said action or proceeding. C. Time spent by city personnel shall, in addition to an employee's hourly rate of pay, include city's customary overhead expenses for provision of benefits and use of office space and related resources. Time spent by contract personnel shall be charged at actual cost to the city. D. The term "incidental expenses," as used in this section, includes, but is not limited to, the actual expenses of the city in the preparation of notices, specifications, and contracts, inspection of the work and costs of printing and mailings required by this chapter. "Attorney fees" shall include fees and expenses of outside counsel and time spent by the city attorney and his or her staff, calculated like other city personnel. 1.25.120 Hearing before city council —Report on costs. A. Upon receipt of the statement of costs, the city clerk shall set for hearing before the city council the matter of the report of costs. The city clerk shall cause notice to be given in the manner provided for in Section 1.23.060 to the owner of the property to which the same relates, any responsible party, and to any other interested persons who requests notice, at least ten days in advance of such hearing and shall provide a copy of the statement of costs. At the time and place fixed for receiving and considering the statement of costs and expenses of the abatement, the city council shall hear and pass upon the statement, together with any specific objections or protests raised by any of the persons liable to be assessed for the costs of abating such nuisance. The city council may make such revisions, corrections, or modifications to the statement as it may deem just or necessary. The hearing may be continued from time to time. C. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the city council shall adopt a resolution determining the costs of abatement. The city council may also require, by resolution, that the costs be a nuisance abatement lien or special assessment upon the subject property as provided for in Section 1.25.150 of this code. The decision of the city council shall be final and conclusive. 1.25.130 Treble costs of abatement. The city council provides that, upon entry of a second or subsequent civil or criminal judgment within a two-year period finding that an owner of property or a person is responsible for a condition requiring abatement, except for conditions abated pursuant to Section 17980 of the Health and Safety Code, a court may order the owner of property responsible for a condition that may be abated in accordance with this chapter to pay treble the costs of abatement pursuant to Government Code Section 38773.7. Additionally, as authorized under Health and Safety Code section 17980.7, a court may extend its jurisdiction and enforcement measures to ensure compliance with abatement orders for substandard housing conditions that pose significant risks to public health and safety and may, among other things, order imposition of penalties and/or order the owner to pay all reasonable and actual costs of enforcement, including attorney's fees or costs and all costs of prosecution. 1.25.140 Limitations on filing judicial action. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 24 of 29 Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6, any action appealing the city's final decision and order shall be commenced within ninety calendar days of the date the decision becomes final. 1.25.150 Nuisance abatement lien and special assessment procedures. A. Nuisance abatement lien. If the city makes the cost of abatement a lien against the property on which the nuisance is maintained, the city shall: Provide notice prior to the recordation of the lien to the owner of record of the parcel of land on which the nuisance is maintained, based on the last equalized assessment roll or the supplement roll, whichever is more current; and Follow the procedure for nuisance abatement liens set forth in Government Code Section 38773.1. Special assessment. If the city makes the abatement costs a special assessment against the property on which the nuisance is maintained, the city shall: Provide notice of the special assessment to the property owner by a method as listed in Section 1.23.060, if the property owner's identity can be determined from the county assessor's or county recorder's records, at the time of imposing the assessment, which notice shall specify that the property may be sold after three years by the tax collector for unpaid delinquent assessments; and The city shall follow the procedures set forth in Government Code Section 38773.5. C. Lien procedures. Whenever the amount of any fine, fee or penalty and/or cost imposed pursuant to this chapter in connection with real property has not been satisfied in full within the time periods set forth in this chapter and/or has not been successfully appealed, this obligation may constitute a lien against the real property on which the violation occurred as follows: The lien shall have no force and effect until recorded with the county recorder. Once recorded, the administrative order shall have the force and effect and priority of a judgment lien governed by the provisions of Section 697.340 of the Code of Civil Procedure and may be extended as provided in Sections 683.110 through 683.220, inclusive, of the Code of Civil Procedure. Interest shall accrue on the principal amount of the judgment remaining unsatisfied pursuant to law. 3. Prior to recording any such lien, the director of finance shall prepare and file with the city clerk a report stating the amounts due and owing. 4. The city clerk shall fix a time, date and place for hearing such report and any protests or objections thereto before the city council. Each protest or objection must contain a description of the property in which the protesting party is interested and the grounds of such protest or objection. Protests or objections shall be limited to the amount of the lien, not the underlying violation of this code. The city council, after the hearing, shall adopt a resolution confirming, discharging or modifying the amount of the lien. 5. The director of finance shall cause written notice to be served on the property owner no less than ten days prior to the time set for the hearing. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 25 of 29 6. Thirty days following the adoption of a resolution by the city council imposing a lien, the city clerk shall file the same judgment lien in the office of the county recorder of Sonoma County. The lien may carry such additional administrative charges as set forth by resolution of the city council. 7. Once payment in full is received by the city for outstanding fines, fees, penalties and costs, the director of finance shall either record a notice of satisfaction or provide the property owner with a notice of satisfaction so they may record this notice with the office of the county records. Such notice of satisfaction shall cancel the city's lien. 1.25.160 Summary abatement Whenever any condition on or use of property causes or constitutes or appears to cause or constitute an immediate hazard or threat, any compliance officer or their authorized representative shall have the authority to institute the following procedures: A. Notice. The code compliance officer shall attempt to make contact through a personal interview, or by telephone, with the owner or responsible party, if any, occupying or otherwise in real or apparent charge and control thereof. In the event contact is made, he or she shall notify such person or persons of the danger involved and require that such condition be immediately removed, repaired or isolated so as to preclude harm to any person or property. Abatement. In the event the code compliance officer is unable to make contact as hereinabove noted, or if the appropriate persons, after notification by the code compliance officer, do not take action as specified by such official, within twenty-four hours, or a lesser period if deemed necessary, then the code compliance officer may, with the approval of the city manager or their designee, and the City Attorney take all steps deemed necessary to remove or isolate such dangerous condition, or conditions, with the use of city forces or a contractor retained pursuant to the provisions of this code. The abatement shall include all actions necessary to secure the premises to prevent further occurrence of the nuisance. C. Summary abatement actions shall not be subject to the notice and hearing requirements of this chapter, and a compliance officer shall not be prohibited from summary abatement actions after initiation of proceedings pursuant to this chapter, if immediate action at any time becomes necessary to preserve or protect the public health or safety. Summary abatement shall be limited to those actions which are necessary to immediately remove the threat. D. The expense of summarily abating a nuisance shall be a charge against the persons creating, causing, committing or maintaining it. The city may make the expense of abatement of the nuisance a debt collectible in the same manner as any other civil debt owing to the city and may be made a special assessment or lien upon the property pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 1.25.150(A) or (B). Chapter 1.26: RESIDENTIAL RENTAL UNITS 1.26.010 Residential rental units. It is declared a public nuisance for any person or entity owning, leasing, renting, occupying, or having charge or possession of any residential dwelling, property or unit(s) in the city to maintain such residential rental dwelling, property or unit(s) in such a manner as to permit their tenant(s), any member of the tenant's household, their children, their guests, or their visitors while on the premises, to EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 26 of 29 create or permit a violation of Section 1.23.030 of this chapter, or to violate or permit the violation of any house rule or lease provision required pursuant to this chapter. A violation of Section 1.23.030 of this chapter, or of any house rule or lease provision required pursuant to this chapter shall include, but shall not be limited to, any criminal, drug -related or other activity on or near such premises that threatens the health, safety, or right of peaceful enjoyment of the premises of the other residents or adjacent property, wherein the owner fails to take all necessary action(s) or to make necessary expenditure(s) to correct the violation within thirty days of receiving notice of such violation. Such violation may, at the city's discretion, be abated pursuant to this chapter, and in addition, pursuant to the procedures for abatement which are conferred upon the city by the Code of Civil Procedure Section 731, Health and Safety Code Sections 11570-11579 and other lawful authority. Further, any person or entity owning, leasing out, renting out, occupying, or having charge or possession of any residential dwelling, property or unit(s) in the city shall jointly and severally be responsible for the administrative costs or any other costs of the city abating or causing the owner or other person responsible for the property to abate a violation of this chapter. Such costs may be recouped by the city pursuant to the provisions of this chapter or any other method provided by this code or other provisions of law or statute. 1.26.020 On -site residential manager. Any residential rental dwelling, property, or complex having sixteen or more rental units shall have an on -site resident manager available during normal business hours. 1.26.030 House rules. Each owner or manager of each residential rental dwelling, property or unit(s) shall comply with the following: A. Provide each tenant, pursuant to the compliance schedule required by Section 1.26.040 of this chapter, with a written agreement, in the form of a lease, rental agreement or, for any tenancy of less than one-year, other enforceable written contract, signed by the tenant and owner, or their agent, or their designee, which rental agreement shall include a copy of Section 1.23.030 of this chapter and house rules containing the following language: House Rules The tenant(s), all household members, children, guests, and visitors, shall refrain from activities that violate City codes, state codes or statutes, constitute a public nuisance, or disturb the peace. The tenant(s) acknowledge(s) responsibility for their actions and for the actions of household members, children, guests, or visitors while on the leased premises. The tenant(s), all household members, children, guests, or visitors are prohibited from engaging in any illegal activities on or near the leased premises, including, but not limited to: a. Any criminal or civil activity that threatens the health, safety, or right of peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other residents or adjacent property owners; or b. Any drug -related or criminal activity on or near the leased premises. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 27 of 29 4. By signing the lease to which these House Rules are attached, the tenant(s) are on notice that any disturbance, criminal activity, or violation of these House Rules attributable to any tenant(s), household members, children, guests, or visitors shall constitute a material lease violation and shall be cause for immediate termination of tenancy and eviction from the unit. The property manager will assign and control all parking and common areas to ensure that activities occurring there do not constitute a public nuisance, disturbance of the peace, disturbance of quiet enjoyment of the occupants of the property or neighboring properties, or a violation of any federal, state, or local law, including, but not limited to, fighting, littering, consumption of alcohol or of any illegal drug, narcotic or controlled substance, prostitution, brandishment of any weapon, urination, defecation, or intoxication. A copy of the signed lease agreements, or addenda containing the information required under this section, and house rules shall be kept in the office of the property manager. All lease agreements, rules and regulations shall be either in English or Spanish, according to the tenant(s) native language, or shall be explained to the tenant(s) by an interpreter signing an affidavit. C. A copy of the house rules in English and Spanish shall be posted in all common areas such as laundry rooms, lobbies, hallways, and community rooms. 1.26.040 Schedule. A. Each owner or manager of a residential dwelling, property or unit(s) which is rented or leased to, or occupied by, a residential tenant or tenants shall comply with the requirements of Section 1.26.030 of this chapter according to the following schedule: For each residential rental property, dwelling or unit(s) which is rented or leased to, or occupied by, a new tenant or tenants subsequent to the effective date of this chapter, the owner or manager shall require the incorporation of all the information required by Section 1.26.030 in a written lease or addendum at such time as the property, dwelling or unit(s) is rented or leased to, or occupied by, such new tenant or tenants. For each residential rental property, dwelling or unit(s) which is occupied pursuant to a written lease in effect as of the effective date of this chapter, the owner or manager shall not be required to incorporate the information required by Section 1.26.030 in a new lease or addendum until such time as the existing tenancy is terminated and the property, dwelling or unit(s) is rented or leased to, or occupied by, a new tenant or tenants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, for each such residential rental property, dwelling or unit which is rented, leased to or occupied by, an existing tenant or tenants pursuant to a written lease in effect as of the effective date of this chapter, the owner or manager shall provide each such existing tenant with a copy of the house rules within sixty days of the effective date of this chapter. For each residential rental property, dwelling or unit(s) which is occupied as of the effective date of this chapter on a month -to -month or other holdover basis, the owner or manager shall be required to incorporate the information required by Section 1.26.030 in a new lease or lease addendum within thirty days or the earlier of either: Notification to the existing tenant of any change in the terms or conditions of such month -to -month or other holdover tenancy, including, but not limited to any rent modification; or EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 28 of 29 b. One year subsequent to the effective date of the ordinance from which this chapter is derived. 1.26.050 Responsibility for property maintenance. A. Every owner of real property within the city is required to maintain such property in a manner so as not to violate the provisions of this chapter and such owner remains liable for violations thereof regardless of any contract or agreement with any third party regarding such property. Every occupant, lessee, tenant or holder of any interest in real property, other than the owner thereof, who had assumed responsibility for the maintenance of such property under terms of a written lease, rental agreement, or other contractual arrangement, and to the extent of that legal responsibility for maintenance, shall produce for inspection the document establishing such obligation. 1.26.060 Violation. Any person, firm, corporation or other entity, whether owner or responsible party of any premises, that violates the provisions of this chapter or any order issued pursuant to this chapter, shall be subject to any or all of the following: A. Such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, unless reduced to an infraction by the prosecutorial authority or enforcement officer in accordance with Section 1.16.010; B. Such person shall be prosecuted in a civil action brought by the city to enjoin any nuisance, violation of this chapter or violation of any other ordinance of the city; C. Such person shall be subject to summary or administrative abatement of the nuisance by the city and be subject to fees and costs imposed by the city pursuant to the summary or administrative abatement procedures set forth in this chapter or any other provisions of law and Every day that any such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the city council from authorizing the city attorney or other authorized legal representative to commence any available administrative, civil, or criminal proceeding; D. Such person shall be subject to the issuance of administrative citations pursuant to the city's administrative citation procedures as set forth in Chapter 1.24; and E. All remedies set forth in this chapter are cumulative and may be pursued alternatively or in combination with one another. Provisions of this chapter are to be supplementary and complementary to all of the city ordinances, state law and any law cognizable as common law or in equity, and nothing herein shall be read, interpreted or construed in any manner so as to limit any exercising right or power of the city to abate any and all nuisances. Chapter 1.27: RESERVED. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 986 Page 29 of 29 ITEM NO. 8.E. Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Communityfor Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: January 28, 2025 Department: Public Safety Submitted By: Tim Mattos, Director Prepared By: Aaron Johnson, Deputy Chief Agenda Title: Receive Progress Report on the Status of the Emergency Public Safety Antenna and Radio System Replacement Project (CIP2412), as required by the Public Contract Code and by Minute Order, authorize the continuation of Resolution 2024-051 until the emergency action is completed. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Receive Progress Report on the Status of the Emergency Public Safety Antenna and Radio System Replacement Project (CIP2412), as required by the Public Contract Code and 2. By Minute Order, authorize the continuation of Resolution 2024-051 until the emergency action is completed. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: On June 25, 2024, the Rohnert Park City Council adopted Resolution 2024-051 Declaring an Emergency Project Pursuant to Public Contract Code Sections 20168 and 22050, Amending the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 Capital Improvement Plan to Add the Public Safety Antenna and Radio System Replacement Project (CIP2412) with a project budget of $1,500,000.00, Approving a budget Amendment to Transfer $1,500,000.00 from Non -Departmental Operating Fund, Equipment Over $5,000 to the new CIP2412 Project, and award the Construction Contract to Dailey -Wells. The City Council is required to review the status of this emergency project at each regular meeting of the City Council and vote to authorize the continuation of Resolution 2024-051 until the emergency action is completed. Since the last communication, the County has reviewed the request with equipment specifications and determined the site will work. Staff are in the process of completing a lease agreement between the County and the City. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it does not qualify as a "project" pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15320, 15378 and 15061(b)(3), because it can be seen with certainty that ITEM NO. 7.G. there is no possibility the City's action would cause either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Public Safety Antenna and Radio System Replacement Project (CIP2412) involves replacement of existing equipment and is categorically exempt from the requirements CEQA pursuant CEQA Guidelines sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction without an increase in use), (14 Cal. Code Regis. §§ 15301, 15302). STRATEGIC PLAN AND COUNCIL PRIORITIES ALIGNMENT: Presenting this progress report is consistent with the City's values of communication and integrity and the City's strategic priority Goal C "Ensure the effective delivery of public services." OPTIONS CONSIDERED: 1. Receive Progress Report on the Status of the Emergency Public Safety Antenna and Radio System Replacement Project (CIP2412), as required by the Public Contract Code and by Minute Order, authorize the continuation of Resolution 2024-051 until the emergency action is completed. 2. No other options were considered as this action is required by law and by Council Resolution 2024-051. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this progress report. Department Head Approval Date: 01/16/2025 City Attorney Approval Date: N/A Finance Director Approval Date: N/A City Manager Approval Date: 1/19/24 Attachments: None. 2 N F eT LI) �M1LIFARpti� ITEM NO. 8.F. Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Communityfor Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: January 28, 2024 Department: Finance Department Submitted By: Betsy Howze, Finance Director Prepared By: Betsy Howze, Finance Director Agenda Title: Adopt a Resolution Approving the Measure H Funding Agreement Between the County of Sonoma and the City of Rohnert Park and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Same RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution approving the Measure H Funding Agreement Between the County of Sonoma and the City of Rohnert Park and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same. BACKGROUND: On March 5, 2024, the voters of Sonoma County approved Measure H, "The Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance", which added Article VIII to Chapter 12 of the Sonoma County Code ("Ordinance"). The Ordinance provides funding to achieve effective and efficient regional fire response services throughout Sonoma County by increasing the Sonoma County sales tax rate by'/2 percent. This increase brings the total City sales tax rate to 9.5%. As part of the oversight and administration of the Ordinance, Section 12-68(A) of the Ordinance requires a funding agreement between the County of Sonoma and recipients, including the City, before any tax proceeds are distributed. 1. Allocation of Funds. As provided in Section 12-66(D), the allocation percentage of funds generated by the Ordinance to be received by the City is five and one-half percent (5.5%). 2. Distribution of Funds. County shall distribute the sales tax proceeds to the City on a quarterly basis based on the following schedule: July — September proceeds will be distributed by the 10th of December; October — December proceeds will be distributed by the 1 Oth of March; January — March proceeds will be distributed by the 1 Oth of June; and April — June proceeds will be distributed by the 1 Oth of September. The first distribution of tax proceeds from County to City per the Ordinance and Agreement will be made by the 1 Oth of March 2025 for the October — December 2024 collection date. It is estimated that the City will receive approximately $2.6 million for FY 2024-25 with the final FY 24-25 distribution to be received by September 10, 2025. ITEM NO. 8.F. Permissible Use of Funds For the City of Rohnert Park, funds shall be allocated for programs and projects that do one of the following: 1. Wildfire Prevention, Preparedness, Response, and Vegetation Management. 2. Recruitment and Retention of Local Firefighters. 3. Update Essential Equipment and Facilities. 4. Transfer of Funds Among Designated Local Agencies or Other Entities. First year funds will be used to pay for 24-hour coverage for the shared Battalion Chief position approved by the Council as part of the FY 24-25 Budget. Remaining funds will be used to build reserves for any future economic downturns, and planned staffing. Staff will return to the Council for any other proposed expenditures for FY 24-25, and will prepare a budget for adoption for FY 25-26. Oversight Committee The Ordinance provides a provision that the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors shall establish an Oversight Committee consisting of eleven appointed members to provide transparency and ensure fiscal accountability. The Committee shall review the receipt and expenditures of the revenue from the transactions and use tax, including an annual report of each Agency's use of the tax. Any written report shall be a public record. All Committee members shall be independent County residents and shall be appointed as follows: The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors shall appoint six Committee members to sit on the Oversight Committee. Two of the Committee members will be selected from a list of names submitted by the Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association of Sonoma County. Two of the Committee members will be selected from a list of names submitted by the labor organizations responsible for collective bargaining on behalf of active -duty firefighters employed by local agencies which receive funding through this Ordinance. 2. The Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association will appoint three Committee members. One will be selected from a list of names nominated from the general public. 3. The Sonoma County Fire Districts Association will appoint two Committee members. One will be selected from a list of names submitted by the Sonoma County Taxpayers Association. Committee Members will serve a three-year term and are eligible to be reappointed by their appointing body. Subject to Sections 12-67(C) and 12-67(D) of the Ordinance, the Oversight Committee shall have the authority to audit the receipt and expenditures as set forth in the annual reports submitted by Recipients. Baseline Maintenance of Effort (MOE) As provided in Section 12-65, Ordinance proceeds shall not be used to supplant the City's historical general fund contribution for providing fire related services. The proportional allocation to determine maintenance of effort is City's baseline operating budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, which includes ad valorem property taxes, parcel taxes or any other taxes and/or fees in support of the operating cost for providing fire related services, but excludes limited term funds such as capital projects, grants, grant matches or other one-time revenues, which will be reported on the City's Annual Report in Exhibit A. 2 ITEM NO. 8.F. The Parties intend and agree to execute an Amendment to this Funding Agreement prior to the submission of the Annual Report, which sets forth City's proportional allocation. If the proportional allocation to City in any subsequent fiscal year is materially less than the FY 21/22 allocation, then the jurisdiction that provides funding shall be deemed to violate the maintenance of effort requirement. Baseline Personnel Funding For the purposes of Section 12-68(A) of the Ordinance, as provided in the operating budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, City's annual existing revenues used to fund existing personnel in order to establish the baseline for measuring compliance with the requirement that sales tax proceeds shall only be used to pay for additional personnel will be reported on the City's Annual Report in Exhibit A. The Parties intend and agree to execute an Amendment to this Funding Agreement prior to the submission of the Annual Report, which sets forth City's baseline personnel funding. 30-year limit on Bonded Indebtedness As provided in Sections 12-63 and 12-66(C), the City may issue limited tax bonds to finance any program or project in accordance with the Ordinance Expenditure Plan, as allowed by applicable law and as approved by their respective legislative body. The maximum bonded indebtedness shall not exceed the projected 30-year distribution of City's annual allocation and any costs associated with the issuance of such bonds shall be accounted for within the program category in which the bond proceeds are used. Reporting Requirements a. In order to ensure consistency in distribution, reporting, oversight, and administration of the funds generated by the Ordinance as set forth in Section 12-67(B) of the Ordinance, annual reports to the Oversight Committee shall be made by City not later than December 31St of each year in the form attached as Exhibit A to the proposed Funding Agreement. b. If the City receives funding as part of the Countywide Expenditures from the Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association ("SCFCA") pursuant to Section 12-66(C)(6) of the Ordinance, City shall prepare an annual report to be provided to SCFCA no later than September 30th to be included in the SCFCA's annual report to the Oversight Committee. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: This action is not a Project under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). STRATEGIC PLAN AND COUNCIL GOALS/PRIORITIES ALIGNMENT: The proposed action aligns with the City's strategic goals priorities of: oo Long Term Financial Sustainability. oo Community Quality of Life. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: 1. Recommended Option: Staff recommends that the Council authorize the City Manager to execute the funding agreement. The County will not release the Measure H funds to the City until a funding agreement is in place. 2. Alternative Not Recommended: Do not authorize the City Manager to execute the funding agreement, and the City's ability to receive Measure H funds will be delayed. ITEM NO. 8.F. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: As provided in the Ordinance Section 12-65, Maintenance of Effort Requirement, Ordinance proceeds shall not be used to supplant the City's historical general fund contribution for providing fire related services. The proportional allocation to determine maintenance of effort is the City's baseline operating budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, which includes ad valorem property taxes, parcel taxes or any other taxes and/or fees in support of the operating cost for providing fire related services but excluding limited term funds such as capital projects, grants, grant matches or other one-time revenues. This is a very complicated calculation for the City, and is still in progress. An error in the calculation could cause the City to over contribute the amount of required general funds to fire response services in future years, resulting in less flexibility in determining funding for other general fund programs. The Measure H Ordinance Funds will be held in a separate Special Revenue Fund to ensure that they are not co -mingled with General Funds, and the that the revenues and expenditures can be budgeted and tracked for reporting purposes, and review by the County Oversight Board. Based on estimates provided, it is estimated that for FY 2024-25 the City will received approximately $2.6M based on three quarters of sales tax activity, and approximately $3.4M for FY 2025-26. Department Head Approval Date: 01/12/25 City Attorney Approval Date: 01/13/25 City Manager Approval Date: 01/22/25 Attachments: 1. Measure H County Ordinance 2. Proposed City Resolution 3. Proposed Measure H Funding Agreement and Exhibit A to Measure H Funding Agreement The People of the County of Sonoma ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Title. This measure shall be known and may be cited as the "Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Initiative." SECTION 2. Findings. Like many counties in California, Sonoma County has faced major challenges in recent years when it comes to the critical funding needs facing fire services as we all prepare for future wildfire and winter storms impacts. The annual threat of both are now a reality that is not going away, and Sonoma County Fire Chiefs and Firefighters are concerned that the current County wide fire service delivery structure, funding, and system structure is not enough. While our county grows and public safety demands increase, the public we serve needs and expects prompt, efficient and effective emergency service everywhere at any time. Our specific concerns include that the system is not meeting National Fire Protection Agency standards in all parts of the county. Several service gaps exist, especially in the more rural areas where there are currently extended response times to critical medical emergencies and vehicle accident victims. There are also significant delays in getting an effective fire force on scene to keep small fires from becoming major incidents. Following the failure of Measure G on the March 2020 ballot, the Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association has invested significant resources into qualifying a new initiative for the March 2024 ballot. The new initiative was written by local firefighters and fire chiefs, who believe the measure addresses a critical need facing Sonoma County and reflects their knowledge of the challenges and needs for fire protection. All funds raised by this measure would be spent by Sonoma County fire agencies to provide fire protection and emergency response services. Strict financial accountability provisions and annual reporting will ensure all funds are spent properly. The Sonoma County Fire Prevention and Response Measure would create a regional plan based on population density, call volumes, station coverage, current service gaps, and special hazards to advance a comprehensive long-term strategy covering all jurisdictions. The Sonoma County Fire Prevention and Response Measure would levy a 1/2 cent sales tax that would generate $60 million annually to address funding challenges. The Measure would increase effective firefighting force available countywide using National Fire Protection Agency standards 1710/ 1720 and a key goal of 3 local firefighters per engine. The Measure would reduce the strain of responding outside of existing boundaries, reduce dependence on larger fire agencies and increase the overall Page 1 of 18 strength of the firefighting system, while improving recruitment and retention of firefighters countywide. The Measure would also increase capacity for local fire prevention efforts like vegetation management. The Sonoma County Fire Prevention and Response Measure would include fiscal accountability protections including representation from Fire Districts Association, Fire Chiefs Association, Taxpayers Association, Board of Supervisors Nominees, City Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association Nominees, Citizen at Large and Labor. A mandatory oversight committee would be required, and all measure funding would be required to stay local and no funding could be taken away by the State or reallocated for purposes other than those specified in this measure. SECTION 3. Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Initiative. Article VIII is added to Chapter 12 of the Sonoma County Code as follows: Article VIII — The Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance. Section 12-60. TITLE. This Ordinance shall be known, and may be cited, as the "Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance," and may hereinafter be referred to as the "Ordinance." The County of Sonoma hereinafter shall be called the "County." This Ordinance shall be applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County. Section 12-61. SEPARATE SECTION WITH TRUE AND IMPARTIAL STATEMENT OF FACTS IDENTIFYING THE TAX AND SPECIFIC LIMITATIONS ON HOW THE REVENUE CAN BE SPENT. If approved by a simple majority of County voters, this Ordinance enacts a retail transactions and use tax in Sonoma County at the rate of one half of a cent per dollar ($0.005) to be used only for the purposes set forth in section 12-66, including, but not limited to, wildfire prevention, preparedness, emergency response and vegetation management; recruitment and retention of local firefighters; updates to essential equipment and facilities; transfer of funds among designated local agencies or entities; implementation costs; and countywide expenditures. The Expenditure Plan set forth in section 12-66 is intended as a specific and legally binding and enforceable limitation on how the proceeds of the transactions and use tax imposed by this Ordinance may be spent. The revenues collected as a result of this tax may not be used for any purposes not specifically identified in this Ordinance. Section 12-62. IMPLEMENTATION OF IMPROVED AND ENHANCED LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION, PARAMEDIC SERVICES AND DISASTER RESPONSE Page 2 of 18 TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX ORDINANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. A. Effective Date; Operative Date. This chapter shall be effective ten (10) days after certification by the Board of Supervisors of the returns of the election indicating approval by a majority of the voters voting in the election of the measure enacting this chapter. The transactions (sales) and use tax imposed hereunder shall be operative the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than one hundred ten (110) days after the adoption of this chapter ("Operative Date"). The operative date for the transactions (sales) and use tax imposed hereunder shall be on October 1, 2024. B. Purpose. 1. This Ordinance is adopted to achieve the following and directs that the provisions hereof be interpreted in order to accomplish those purposes: a. To adopt a retail transactions and use tax ordinance within the County in the amount of one-half of a cent per dollar as provided herein for the specific purpose of generating funds to be deposited into the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account that may only be used for the purposes specified herein, including, but not limited to, wildfire prevention, preparedness, emergency response and vegetation management; recruitment and retention of local firefighters; updates to essential equipment and facilities; transfer of funds among designated local agencies or entities; implementation costs; and countywide expenditures. b. To impose a retail transactions and use tax in accordance with the provisions of Part 1.6 (commencing with section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code and section 7285.5 of Part 1.7 of Division 2 which authorizes the County to adopt this tax Ordinance provided that a majority of the electors voting on the measure vote to approve the imposition of the tax at an election called for that purpose. c. To adopt a retail transactions and use tax ordinance that incorporates provisions identical to those of the Sales and Use Tax Law of the State of California insofar as those provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements and limitations contained in Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. d. To adopt a retail transactions and use tax ordinance that imposes a tax and provides a measure therefor that can be administered and collected by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration in a manner that adapts itself as fully as practicable to, and requires the least possible deviation from, the existing statutory and administrative procedures followed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration in administering and collecting the California State Sales and Use Taxes. e. To adopt a retail transactions and use tax ordinance that can be administered in a manner that will be, to the greatest degree possible, consistent with the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, minimize the cost of collecting the transactions and use taxes, and at the same time, minimize the burden of record keeping Page 3 of 18 upon persons subject to taxation under the provisions of this Ordinance. f. To establish a local funding source for wildfire prevention, preparedness, emergency response and vegetation management, recruitment and retention of local firefighters, updates to essential equipment and facilities, transfer of funds among designated local agencies or entities, implementation costs, and countywide expenditures, provided by the County of Sonoma and the fire agencies throughout the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County, in accordance with section 12-66. g. To increase the appropriations limit for the County to ensure that the proceeds of the proposed special tax may be expended for their intended purposes. h. To authorize issuance of limited tax bonds to finance projects in accordance with section 12-63. C. Contract With State. Prior to the Operative Date, the County shall contract with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to perform all functions incident to the administration and operation of this transactions and use tax Ordinance; provided, that if the County shall not have contracted with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration prior to the Operative Date, it shall nevertheless so contract and in such a case the Operative Date shall be the first day of the first calendar quarter following the execution of such a contract. D. Transactions (Sales) Tax. For the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail, a tax is hereby imposed upon all retailers in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County at the rate of one half of one percent (1/2%) of the gross receipts of any retailer from the sale of all tangible personal property sold at retail in said territory on and after the operative date of this Ordinance. E. Use Tax. An excise tax is hereby imposed on the storage, use or other consumption in the County of tangible personal property purchased from any retailer on and after the operative date of this Ordinance for storage, use or other consumption in said territory at the rate of one half of one percent (1/2%) of the sales price of the property. The sales price shall include delivery charges when such charges are subject to state sales or use tax regardless of the place to which delivery is made. F. Deposit Into Special Account. The County Administrator, County Auditor - Controller -Tax Collector, and/or Finance Department shall establish an Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account and all retail transactions and use proceeds generated by this Ordinance shall be deposited by the County Administrator, County Auditor -Controller -Tax Collector, and/or Finance Department into the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account. Such proceeds shall only be used for the specific purposes and allocations identified in section 12-66. G. Place Of Sale. For the purposes of this Ordinance, all retail sales are consummated at the place of business of the retailer unless the tangible personal Page 4 of 18 property sold is delivered by the retailer or his agent to an out-of-state destination or to a common carrier for delivery to an out-of-state destination. The gross receipts from such sales shall include delivery charges, when such charges are subject to the state sales and use tax, regardless of the place to which delivery is made. In the event a retailer has no permanent place of business in the State or has more than one place of business, the place or places at which the retail sales are consummated shall be determined under rules and regulations to be prescribed and adopted by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. H. Adoption Of Provisions Of State Law. Except as otherwise provided in this Ordinance and except insofar as they are inconsistent with the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, all of the provisions of Part 1 (commencing with section 6001) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code are hereby adopted and made a part of this Ordinance as though fully set forth herein. I. Limitations On Adoption Of State Law And Collection Of Use Taxes. In adopting the provisions of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code: 1. Wherever the State of California is named or referred to as the taxing agency, the name of this County shall be substituted therefor. However, the substitution shall not be made when: a. The word "State" is used as a part of the title of the State Controller, State Treasurer, State Treasury, or the Constitution of the State of California; b. The result of that substitution would require action to be taken by or against this County or any agency, officer, or employee thereof rather than by or against the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, in performing the functions incident to the administration or operation of this Ordinance. c. In those sections, including, but not necessarily limited to sections referring to the exterior boundaries of the State of California, where the result of the substitution would be to: i. Provide an exemption from this tax with respect to certain sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property which would not otherwise be exempt from this tax while such sales, storage, use or other consumption remain subject to tax by the State under the provisions of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or; ii. Impose this tax with respect to certain sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property which would not be subject to tax by the state under the said provision of that code. d. In sections 6701, 6702 (except in the last sentence thereof), 6711, 6715, 6737, 6797 or 6828 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 2. The word "County' shall be substituted for the word "State" in the phrase "retailer engaged in business in this State" in section 6203 and in the definition of that phrase in section 6203. a. "A retailer engaged in business in the County" shall also include any retailer that, in the preceding calendar year or the current calendar year, has total combined sales of tangible personal property in this State Page 5 of 18 or for delivery in the State by the retailer and all persons related to the retailer that exceeds five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). For purposes of this section, a person is related to another person if both persons are related to each other pursuant to section 267(b) of Title 26 of the United States Code and the regulations thereunder. J. Permit Not Required. If a seller's permit has been issued to a retailer under section 6067 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, an additional transactor's permit shall not be required by this Ordinance. K. Exemptions And Exclusions. 1. There shall be excluded from the measure of the transactions tax and the use tax the amount of any sales tax or use tax imposed by the State of California or by any city, city and county, or county pursuant to the Bradley -Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law or the amount of any state -administered transactions or use tax. 2. There are exempted from the computation of the amount of transactions tax the gross receipts from: a. Sales of tangible personal property, other than fuel or petroleum products, to operators of aircraft to be used or consumed principally outside the County in which the sale is made and directly and exclusively in the use of such aircraft as common carriers of persons or property under the authority of the laws of this State, the United States, or any foreign government. b. Sales of property to be used outside the County which is shipped to a point outside the County, pursuant to the contract of sale, by delivery to such point by the retailer or his agent, or by delivery by the retailer to a carrier for shipment to a consignee at such point. For the purposes of this paragraph, delivery to a point outside the County shall be satisfied: i. With respect to vehicles (other than commercial vehicles) subject to registration pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with section 4000) of Division 3 of the Vehicle Code, aircraft licensed in compliance with section 21411 of the Public Utilities Code, and undocumented vessels registered under Division 3.5 (commencing with section 9840) of the Vehicle Code by registration to an out -of -County address and by a declaration under penalty of perjury, signed by the buyer, stating that such address is, in fact, his or her principal place of residence; and ii. With respect to commercial vehicles, by registration to a place of business out -of -County and declaration under penalty of perjury, signed by the buyer, that the vehicle will be operated from that address. c. The sale of tangible personal property if the seller is obligated to furnish the property for a fixed price pursuant to a contract entered into prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. d. A lease of tangible personal property which is a continuing sale of such property, for any period of time for which the lessor is obligated Page 6 of 18 to lease the property for an amount fixed by the lease prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. e. For the purposes of subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this section, the sale or lease of tangible personal property shall be deemed not to be obligated pursuant to a contract or lease for any period of time for which any party to the contract or lease has the unconditional right to terminate the contract or lease upon notice, whether or not such right is exercised. 3. There are exempted from the use tax imposed by this Ordinance, the storage, use or other consumption in this County of tangible personal property: a. The gross receipts from the sale of which have been subject to a transactions tax under any state -administered transactions and use tax ordinance. b. Other than fuel or petroleum products purchased by operators of aircraft and used or consumed by such operators directly and exclusively in the use of such aircraft as common carriers of persons or property for hire or compensation under a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued pursuant to the laws of this State, the United States, or any foreign government. This exemption is in addition to the exemptions provided in sections 6366 and 6366.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. c. If the purchaser is obligated to purchase the property for a fixed price pursuant to a contract entered into prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. d. If the possession of, or the exercise of any right or power over, the tangible personal property arises under a lease which is a continuing purchase of such property for any period of time for which the lessee is obligated to lease the property for an amount fixed by a lease prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. e. For the purposes of subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this section, storage, use, or other consumption, or possession of, or exercise of any right or power over, tangible personal property shall be deemed not to be obligated pursuant to a contract or lease for any period of time for which any party to the contract or lease has the unconditional right to terminate the contract or lease upon notice, whether or not such right is exercised. f. Except as provided in subparagraph (7), a retailer engaged in business in the County shall not be required to collect use tax from the purchaser of tangible personal property, unless the retailer ships or delivers the property into the County or participates within the County in making the sale of the property, including, but not limited to, soliciting or receiving the order, either directly or indirectly, at a place of business of the retailer in the County or through any representative, agent, canvasser, solicitor, subsidiary, or person in the County under the authority of the retailer. g. "A retailer engaged in business in the County" shall also include any retailer of any of the following: vehicles subject to registration pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with section 4000) of Division 3 of the Vehicle Code, aircraft licensed in compliance with section Page 7 of 18 21411 of the Public Utilities Code, or undocumented vessels registered under Division 3.5 (commencing with section 9840) of the Vehicle Code. That retailer shall be required to collect use tax from any purchaser who registers or licenses the vehicle, vessel, or aircraft at an address in the County. 4. Any person subject to use tax under this Ordinance may credit against that tax any transactions tax or reimbursement for transactions tax paid to a district imposing, or retailer liable for a transactions tax pursuant to Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code with respect to the sale to the person of the property the storage, use or other consumption of which is subject to the use tax. L. Amendments. All amendments subsequent to the effective date of this Ordinance to Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code relating to sales and use taxes and which are not inconsistent with Part 1.6 and Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and all amendments to Part 1.6 and Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, shall automatically become a part of this Ordinance, provided however, that no such amendment shall operate so as to affect the rate of tax imposed by this Ordinance. M. Enjoining Collection Forbidden. No injunction or writ of mandate or other legal or equitable process shall issue in any suit, action or proceeding in any court against the State or the County, or against any officer of the State or the County, to prevent or enjoin the collection under this Ordinance, or Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, of any tax or any amount of tax required to be collected. N. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4), adoption of this transaction and use tax Ordinance and Expenditure Plan is not a project subject to the requirements of CEQA. Prior to commencement of any project included in the Expenditure Plan, any necessary environmental review required by CEQA shall be completed. Estimated costs in the Expenditure Plan include the cost of such environmental review. Section 12-63. ESTABLISHMENT OF BONDING AUTHORITY. The cities and fire agencies are authorized to issue bonds for the purposes of advancing the commencement of or expediting the delivery of programs or projects in accordance with the Expenditure Plan set forth in section 12-66. Pursuant to Government Code sections 55800 et seq., or any successor statute, the cities and fire agencies may issue limited tax bonds, from time to time, secured by and payable from all or any portion of the transactions and use tax imposed by this Ordinance to finance any program or project in the Expenditure Plan. The maximum bonded indebtedness, including issuance costs, interest, reserve requirements, and bond insurance, if any, shall not exceed the total amount of the proceeds anticipated to be collected by the imposition of this transactions and use tax. All costs associated with the issuance of such bonds shall be accounted for within the program category in which the bond proceeds are used. The bonds may be issued any time throughout the duration of this tax. Nothing herein shall limit or restrict in any way the power and authority of the 9, County, the cities or any fire suppression agency to issue bonds, notes or other obligations, to enter into loan agreements, leases, reimbursement agreements, standby bond purchase agreements or derivative contracts or to engage in any other transaction under the Government Code or any other law. Section 12-64. APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT. The appropriations limit for the County shall be increased for the maximum period permitted by law (four years) to allow for the use of all proceeds raised by the special tax imposed by this Ordinance. Section 12-65. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT REQUIREMENT. The proceeds from this Ordinance shall not be used to supplant an agency's historical general fund(s) contribution originating from ad valorem property taxes, parcel taxes, or any other taxes and/or fees, in support of the operating (non -capital project or limited term expenses) cost for providing its fire related services. The baseline for maintenance of effort purposes will be set as the amount that each agency has for their baseline operating budget (not including limited term funds such as capital projects, grants, grant matches, or other one- time revenues) for fiscal year 2021-2022. If the proportional allocation provided to any agency is materially different than the same proportion allocated in fiscal year 2021-2022, then the jurisdiction, whether County, City of special district, which provides funding shall be deemed to not have upheld maintenance of effort, and will violate this section. Section 12-66. EXPENDITURE PLAN. A. Statement of Intent. The fundamental principle guiding this Expenditure Plan is to provide more efficient, effective, and sustainable emergency response, and wildfire prevention capabilities that protect the health and safety of the public in Sonoma County. To achieve this goal, a sub -committee of the Sonoma County Fire Chiefs developed a plan that looks beyond established boundaries to protect the public's safety. The ensuing Deployment Plan, which is the basis of this Expenditure Plan, was informed by NFPA 1710/ 1720 National Standards, as well an analysis of population density, call volumes, station coverage response times, special hazard areas, and local knowledge and was developed to provide a long- term framework for planning, funding, and implementing enhanced fire and wildfire capabilities within Sonoma County. The goals of this Expenditure Plan embody the lessons learned from the October 2017 fires (Tubbs, Nuns and Pocket fires), 2019 fires (Kincade fire), and 2020 fires (Walbridge and Glass fires) and several hundred years of experience of the local Fire Chiefs and firefighters that informed this Expenditure Plan. The Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association is in support of this Ordinance as it has been developed through the guidance and input of all Sonoma County fire agencies and will provide sustainable funding for effective and efficient regional fire response and preparedness services throughout Sonoma County. B. Purposes. The Expenditure Plan for the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Page 9 of 18 Ordinance (the "Ordinance") provides for investment into six program categories which include, but are not limited to: wildfire prevention, preparedness, emergency response and vegetation management; recruitment and retention of local firefighters; updates to essential equipment and facilities; transfer of funds among designated local agencies or entities; implementation costs; and countywide expenditures. The tax proceeds must be spent for the purposes authorized in this Expenditure Plan and may not be used for other purposes. The revenues collected from the tax shall be used only to supplement existing services and shall not be used to pay for existing operations. The percentage of tax being distributed to each Agency is set forth in section 12-66(D). C. Permissible Use of Funds. The revenues generated by the retail transactions and use tax imposed by this Ordinance shall be allocated by Sonoma County on a quarterly basis with additional independent oversight provided by the Oversight Committee described in section 12-67 to ensure expenditures are consistent with this section. Funds shall be allocated for programs and projects that do one of the following: 1. Wildfire Prevention, Preparedness, Response, and Vegetation Management. The addition of approximately 200 firefighters, which will provide for more efficient, effective, and sustainable fire response, paramedic services, and wildfire prevention and response capabilities that protect the health and safety of Sonoma County residents, business owners, and visitors. The sales tax will fund new regional fire inspectors and a county -wide vegetation management crew to provide enhanced vegetation management to prevent wildfire spread throughout the county. Local fire agencies' staff shall provide vegetation management services in their jurisdictions, including parcel inspections to ensure that property owners are complying with minimum vegetation management standards of the County of Sonoma's Abatement of Hazardous Vegetation and Combustible Material ordinance or relevant ordinance (that meets the minimum standards established by the County) within an agency's jurisdiction. The county -wide crew will perform vegetation management fire prevention services that will directly mitigate hazards, reduce fuels, reinforce evacuation routes, and construct fuel breaks. 2. Recruitment and Retention of Local Firefighters. As described above, the sales tax will provide support for approximately 200 additional firefighters throughout the county to protect the public's health and safety. The enhanced level of service will fund qualified firefighters and paramedics to provide wildfire suppression, emergency response, and vegetation management fire prevention services. In addition, the sales tax will go to certain fire agencies that have specific challenges recruiting and retaining full-time firefighters. 3. Update Essential Equipment and Facilities. The agencies that provide fire suppression services are authorized upon the approval of their respective legislative bodies, to use their allocation of tax proceeds to bond for the purpose of improving and/or replacing fire facilities, equipment and/or apparatus to increase the capacity of their respective fire suppression agencies to respond to the fire suppression and fire prevention needs of their respective communities including equipment and facilities upgrades, construction and/or acquisition. An agency with municipal fire Page 10 of 18 suppression services may issue limited tax bonds, from time to time, to finance any program or project in accordance with this Expenditure Plan as allowed by applicable law and as approved by their respective legislative body, and the maximum bonded indebtedness shall not exceed the projected 30-year distribution of their annual allocation. 4. Transfer of Funds Among Designated Local Agencies or Other Entities. Local Agencies which receive funds allocated from the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance shall be permitted to enter into an agreement with any other local agency or entity which is delivering products and/or services which accomplish the purposes of this Ordinance. 5. Implementation Costs. In addition to the purposes set forth above, Sonoma County is permitted to allocate funds raised by the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance to pay for expenses incurred after the effective date of the Ordinance which relate to the implementation of the tax, including payments necessary for the operation of the Oversight Committee and Measure reporting set forth in section 12- 67. These expenses shall be accounted for, and any amount in excess of the amount allocated to the County in section 12-66(D) shall be removed from the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account prior to distribution of funds to agencies, as set forth in section 12-66(D). 6. Countywide Expenditures. Revenue allocated to the Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association (SCFCA) may fund Countywide Fire Service expenses. The types of expenses to be funded include but are not limited to: REDCOM dispatch fees (Districts and Cities) and additional capacity to bring REDCOM to a Command Center lever of service; Lexipol fees; public and non-profit organizations that assist with Countywide vegetation management utilizing the adopted Community Wildfire Protection Plan; technologies to improve and enhanced fire protection and prevention, paramedic services, and disaster response; Red Flag and winter storm upstaffing; Countywide recruitment and training programs; SCFCA administrative support to ensure tax measure compliance; sustainability of current County funding agreements for service provision; and potential one-time gap funding to fire agencies as determined by the SCFCA. Each funding recipient shall be required to prepare an annual report that will be provided to the SCFCA no later than the last day of the third month following the end of the fiscal year to be included in the SCFCA's annual report to the Oversight Committee. D. Allocation of funds. The following entities will receive a percentage of Tax Allocated as follows: Entity Percentage of Tax City of Healdsburg 2.51 Page 11 of 18 City of Petaluma 7.19% City of Rohnert Park 5.50% City of Santa Rosa 14.40% City of Sebastopol 1.80% City of Sonoma 1.18% Cazadero Community Services District 1.14% Cloverdale Fire Protection District (including the City of Cloverdale) 2.78 Gold Ridge Fire Protection District 2.89% Graton Fire Protection District 1.06% Kenwood Fire Protection District 1.87% Monte Rio Fire Protection District 2.43% North Sonoma Coast Fire Protection District 2.39% Northern Sonoma County Fire Protection District 5.00% Occidental Community Services District 1.61 Rancho Adobe Fire Protection District (including the City of Cotati) 3.50% Schell -Vista Fire Protection District 1.20% Sonoma County Fire District (including the Town of Windsor) 6.61 Sonoma Valley Fire District 5.20% Timber Cove Fire Protection District 2.47% Community Service Area 40 (Bodega) 0.13% Page 12 of 18 Community Service Area 40 (Camp Meeker) 0.39% Community Service Area 40 (Fort Ross) 0.02% Community Service Area 40 (Lakeville) 1.97% Community Service Area 40 (Two Rock) 0.03% Community Service Area 40 (Valley Ford) 1.96% Community Service Area 40 (Wilmar) 2.28% Northern Sonoma County Fire Protection District - Fund and manage Countywide Vegetation 5.00% Management Crews County of Sonoma — Fire Prevention and Haz-Mat 0.42 Division County of Sonoma Auditor — Controller — Treasurer 1.00% — Tax Collector Administrative Fee Sonoma County Chiefs Association 14.07% E. Allocation of remaining funds. 1. With each quarterly distribution, the entirety of funds held within the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account should be allocated among entities, as set forth in section 12-66(D). 2. In the event any entity enumerated in section 12-66(D) consolidates with, or is annexed by, any other entity, the successor agency shall receive the funds allocated to the enumerated entity. 3. In the event that the entirety of funds from the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account cannot be distributed according to the schedule set forth in subdivision D of this section, all remaining funds shall be distributed to REDCOM. Section 12-67. INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AND PERFORMANCE AUDIT. A. Composition. The Board of Supervisors shall establish an Oversight Committee consisting of eleven appointed members to provide transparency and ensure fiscal accountability. The Committee shall review the receipt and expenditures of the revenue from the transactions and use tax, including an Page 13 of 18 annual report of each Agency's use of the tax. Any written report shall be a public record. 1. All Committee members shall be independent County residents. For the purposes of this section, and "independent County resident" shall not include active fire chiefs, active fire directors, County employees, or spouses to any such individuals. 2. The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors shall appoint six Committee members to sit on the Oversight Committee. Two of the Committee members will be selected from a list of names submitted by the Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association of Sonoma County. Two of the Committee members will be selected from a list of names submitted by the labor organizations responsible for collective bargaining on behalf of active duty firefighters employed by local agencies which receive funding through this Ordinance. 3. The Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association will appoint three Committee members. One will be selected from a list of names nominated from the general public. 4. The Sonoma County Fire Districts Association will appoint two Committee members. One will be selected from a list of names submitted by the Sonoma County Taxpayers Association. 5. Committee Members will serve a three-year term and are eligible to be reappointed by their appointing body. B. Annual Reports. The funds collected from the Ordinance shall be received and distributed by the County Auditor -Controller -Treasurer -Tax Collector. Each agency which receives any amount from the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account shall prepare and distribute to the Committee, no later than the last day of the sixth month following the end of the fiscal year, an annual report which includes the amount received from the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account and how it was allocated. Each such report shall include as an attachment the agency's most recent annual audit, annual budget, and/or other independent financial review, if available, to the Committee. The Committee shalf review all such reports on at least an annual basis. Each agency's Annual Report shall include the following information: 1. A detail of the prior fiscal year's activities related to the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account by providing a budget to actual report, balance sheet, and fund balance report. 2. A summary of the positions and start up, equipment and facilities that were funded with revenue from the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account. 3. The specific activities that support fire prevention, including vegetation management. Page 14 of 18 4. Update on the status of facility capital improvement projects that are funded with revenue from the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Account. 5. Demonstration of compliance with the requirements of this plan that the funds shall be used to pay for enhancing operations. 6. Anv material changes in the service needs within the agency's jurisdiction or countywide. 7. Any remaining funds from allocations provided in previous years, and an explanation for proposed use of such funds. C. Committee Authority. To preserve the integrity and independence of the oversight process, the Committee's responsibilities shall not include decision making on spending priorities, financing plans or tax rate projections or assumptions, and the Committee shall have no authority to direct, nor shall it direct, County staff or officials or fire agency staff or officials. D. Enforcement of Committee Authority. The Committee is authorized to recommend investigation into the misuse of public funds distributed under the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance to the California State Attorney General, Sonoma County District Attorney, or Sonoma County Grand Jury. Section 12-68. OVERSIGHT AND ADMINISTRATION. A. The implementation of this Ordinance will be the responsibility of the Oversight Committee who reports directly to the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors. The County is charged with a fiduciary duty in administering the tax proceeds in accordance with applicable laws and this Measure. Receipt of tax proceeds may be subject to appropriate terms and conditions, including, but not limited to, the right to require recipients to execute funding agreements and the right to audit recipient's use of the tax proceeds. Environmental reporting, review and approval procedures as provided for under the National Environmental Policy Act, and/or California Environmental Quality Act, or other applicable laws will be adhered to as a prerequisite to the implementation of any project. Actual tax proceeds may be higher or lower than estimated over the duration of this Measure. Funding agreements shall be required before any tax proceeds are distributed. Each funding agreement shall establish existing revenues used to fund existing personnel in order to establish the baseline for measuring compliance with the requirement that sales tax proceeds shall only be used to pay for additional personnel. The funding agreements will acknowledge that the Measure provides funding to achieve effective and efficient regional fire response services throughout Sonoma County. B. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration Costs Payment for the costs of contracting with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration for administration of the tax shall be the responsibility of the County. If the election is successful, the County shall be reimbursed for any fee charged by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration from the proceeds of the tax, and any amounts in excess of the allocation to the County set Page 15 of 18 forth in section 12-66(D) shall be deducted from the annual proceeds from the tax before quarterly distribution to the agencies and entities enumerated in section 12-66(D). C. The annual administrative cost borne by the County's Auditor and County Administrator staff, the Oversight Committee administrative costs and the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, to the extent such costs are in excess of the allocation provided to the County in section 12-66(D), will be deducted from the annual proceeds from the tax before quarterly distribution to the agencies and entities enumerated in section 12-66(D). Section 12-69. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. The County declares that it would have adopted each part of this Ordinance irrespective of the validity of any other part. SECTION 4. Effective Date and Operative Date. This chapter shall be effective ten (10) days after certification by the Board of Supervisors of the returns of the election indicating approval by a majority of the voters voting in the election of the measure enacting this chapter. The operative date for the transactions (sales) and use tax imposed hereunder shall be on October 1, 2024. SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this measure, or part thereof, or the applicability of any provision or part to any person or circumstances, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining provisions and parts shall not be affected, but shall remain in full force and effect, and to this end the provisions and parts of this measure are severable. The People of Sonoma County hereby declare that this measure, and each portion and part, would have been adopted irrespective of whether any one or more provisions or parts are found to be invalid or unconstitutional. The Sonoma County further declare their desire that this measure provide funding as described for wildfire prevention, preparedness, emergency response and vegetation management; recruitment and retention of local firefighters; updates to essential equipment and facilities; transfer of funds among designated local agencies or entities; implementation costs; and countywide expenditures; and that each of these vital County services are independently important of one another. SECTION 6. Conflicting Measures. This measure is intended to be comprehensive. It is the intent of the People of Sonoma County that, in the event this measure appears on the same ballot as one or more measures relating to the imposition of sales and use tax, the provisions of the other measure or measures shall be deemed in conflict with this Page 16 of 18 measure. In the event that this measure receives a greater number of affirmative votes, the provisions of this measure shall prevail in their entirety, and the provisions of the other measure or measures may be implemented only to the extent that those provisions are not in conflict with each provisions this measure. The provisions of a conflicting measure or measures shall be deemed in conflict with this measure if such conflicting measure or measures would, after accounting for this measure's sales and use tax imposition, impose a sales and/or use tax in excess of the limits placed on the imposition of such taxes in Sonoma County by the State of California. If this measure is approved by a majority of the voters, but does not receive a greater number of affirmative votes than any other measure or measures appearing on the same ballot regarding the imposition of sales and use tax set forth herein and/or for the purposes of funding fire protection and improvement, then this measure shall take effect to the extent not in conflict with said other measure or measures. SECTION 7. Liberal Constitution. This measure is an exercise of the initiative power reserved to the People of Sonoma County for funding wildfire prevention, preparedness, emergency response and vegetation management; recruitment and retention of local firefighters; updates to essential equipment and facilities; transfer of funds among designated local agencies or entities; implementation costs; and countywide expenditures; and shall be liberally construed to effectuate that purpose. SECTION 8. Municipal Affair. The People of Sonoma County hereby declare that, separately and together, the following purposes constitute municipal affairs: wildfire prevention, preparedness, emergency response and vegetation management; recruitment and retention of local firefighters; updates to essential equipment and facilities; transfer of funds among designated local agencies or entities; implementation costs; and countywide expenditures. The People of Sonoma County hereby further declare their desire for this measure to coexist with any similar tax measures adopted at the city, county or state levels. SECTION 9. Legal Defense. The People of the Sonoma County desire that this measure, if approved by a simple majority of voters, and thereafter challenged in court, be defended by the Sonoma County. The People of Sonoma County, by approving this measure by a simple majority of voters, hereby declare that the proponent(s) of this Act have a direct and personal stake in defending this measure from constitutional or statutory challenges to the measure's validity or implementation. In the event the Sonoma County fails to defend this measure, or the Sonoma County fails to appeal an adverse judgment against the constitutionality, statutory permissibility or implementation of this measure, in whole or in part, in any court of law, the measure's proponent(s) shall be entitled to assert his, her or their direct personal stake by defending the measure's validity and implementation in any court of law Page 17 of 18 and shall be empowered by the People of Sonoma County through this measure to act as agents of the People of Sonoma County, and Sonoma County shall indemnify the proponent(s) for reasonable fees, expenses and other losses incurred by the proponent(s), as agent(s) of Sonoma County, in defending the validity and/or implementation of the measure. The rate of indemnification shall be no more than the amount it would cost the Sonoma County to perform the defense itself. Page 18 of 18 RESOLUTION NO.2025-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK APPROVING THE MEASURE H FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SONOMA AND CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SAME WHEREAS, on March 5, 2024, the voters of the County of Sonoma ("County") approved Measure H, the Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Initiative, which added Article VIII to Chapter 12 of the County Code ("County Ordinance"); and WHEREAS, the County Ordinance enacts a retail transactions and use tax in the County at the rate of one half of a cent per dollar ($0.005); and WHEREAS, the operative date for the retail transactions and use tax is October 1, 2024; and WHEREAS, the County Ordinance allocates five and one half percent (5.5%) of the retail transactions and use tax collected in the County to the City of Rohnert Park ("City"); and WHEREAS, tax monies received under the County Ordinance may be used only to improve and enhance fire -related services, which include, but are not limited to, wildfire prevention, preparedness, emergency response, and vegetation management; recruitment and retention of local firefighters; updates to essential equipment and facilities; transfer of funds among designated local agencies or entities; implementation costs; and countywide expenditures; and WHEREAS, tax monies received under the County Ordinance may not be used to supplant the City's historical general fund contribution for providing fire related services; and WHEREAS, the County Ordinance requires, among other things, that the County enter into funding agreements with eligible recipient agencies, including the City, to ensure consistency in distributing funds, reporting, overseeing the use of funds, and administering the County Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City that it does hereby authorize and approve the Measure H Funding Agreement with the County, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. BE IT FURTHE RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the same for and on behalf of the City. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 28th day of January, 2025. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Gerard Giudice, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia Lopez Cuevas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A Adams: Elward: Rodriguez: Sanborn: Guidice: Ayes: ( ) Noes: ( ) Absent: ( ) Abstain: ( ) Resolution 2025-006 Page 2 of 2 MEASURE H FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SONOMA AND THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK This Agreement is made and entered into as of ("Effective Date") by and between the County of Sonoma ("County") and the City of Rohnert Park ("City") (collectively, "Parties"). RECITALS WHEREAS, on March 5, 2024, the voters of Sonoma County approved Measure H, "The Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance", which added Article VIII to Chapter 12 of the Sonoma County Code ("Ordinance"); and WHEREAS, the Ordinance provides funding to achieve effective and efficient regional fire response services throughout the County; and WHEREAS, the County is charged with a fiduciary duty in administrating the tax proceeds generated by the Ordinance and implementation of the Ordinance is the responsibility of an Oversight Committee which reports directly to the County Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, Section 12-61 of the Ordinance states: "The Expenditure Plan set forth in section 12-66 is intended as a specific and legally binding and enforceable limitation on how the proceeds of the transactions and use tax imposed by this Ordinance may be spent"; and WHEREAS, as part of the Ordinance Expenditure Plan, Section 12-66(D) provides allocation percentages for entities receiving funds generated by the Ordinance ("Recipients"); and WHEREAS, as part of independent Oversight Committee and performance audit, Section 12- 67(B) of the Ordinance requires Recipients to prepare and distribute to the Oversight Committee specific information in annual reports not later than December 3 1 " of each year; and WHEREAS, as part of the oversight and administration of the Ordinance, Section 12-68(A) of the Ordinance requires a funding agreement between the County and Recipients before any tax proceeds are distributed; and WHEREAS, Section 12-65 of the Ordinance requires that Ordinance proceeds shall not be used to supplant the City's historical proportional allocation to fire related services and establishes a baseline maintenance of effort requirement that shall not be violated; and WHEREAS, Section 12-68(A) of the Ordinance further requires that the funding agreement between the County and Recipients shall establish existing revenue used to fund existing personnel in order to establish the baseline for measuring compliance with the requirement that sales tax proceeds generated by the Ordinance shall only be used to pay for additional personnel; and WHEREAS, the County and Recipients desire to have a uniform agreement to ensure consistency in distribution, reporting, oversight, and administration of the funds generated by the Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the County and the City do hereby agree as follows: 1. The Parties agree to comply with the purpose, intent, use of fund limitations and specific implementation provisions of the Ordinance, which became operative October 1, 2024. 2. Allocation of Funds. As provided in Section 12-66(D), the allocation percentage of funds generated by the Ordinance to be received by the City is five and one-half percent (5.5%), to be used for the purposes set forth in Sections 12-66(B) and 12-66(C) of the Ordinance. As provided in Section 12-66(E), the successor of any enumerated entity in Section 12-66(D) shall receive the funds set forth in that section. 3. Distribution of Funds. The County shall distribute the sales tax proceeds to the City on a quarterly basis based on the following schedule: July — September proceeds will be distributed by the loth of December; October — December proceeds will be distributed by the 1 Oth of March; January — March proceeds will be distributed by the 1 Oth of June; and April — June proceeds will be distributed by the 1 Oth of September. The first distribution of tax proceeds from the County to the City per the Ordinance and this Agreement will be the by the 1 Oth of March 2025 for the October — December 2024 collection date. 4. Baseline maintenance of effort. As provided in Section 12-65, Ordinance proceeds shall not be used to supplant the City's historical general fund contribution for providing fire related services. The proportional allocation to determine maintenance of effort is the City's baseline operating budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, which includes ad valorem property taxes, parcel taxes or any other taxes and/or fees in support of the operating cost for providing fire related services, but excludes limited term funds such as capital projects, grants, grant matches or other one-time revenues, will be reported on the City's Annual Report in Exhibit A. The Parties intend and agree to execute an Amendment to this Funding Agreement prior to the submission of the Annual Report, which sets forth the City's proportional allocation. If the proportional allocation to the City in any subsequent fiscal year is materially less than the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 allocation, then the jurisdiction that provides funding shall be deemed to violate the maintenance of effort requirement. 5. Baseline personnel funding. For the purposes of Section 12-68(A) of the Ordinance, as provided in the operating budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, the City's annual existing 2 revenues used to fund existing personnel in order to establish the baseline for measuring compliance with the requirement that sales tax proceeds shall only be used to pay for additional personnel will be reported on the City's Annual Report in Exhibit A. The Parties intend and agree to execute an Amendment to this Funding Agreement prior to the submission of the Annual Report, which sets forth the City's baseline personnel funding. 6. 30-year limit on Bonded Indebtedness. As provided in Sections 12-63 and 12-66(C), the City may issue limited tax bonds to finance any program or project in accordance with the Ordinance Expenditure Plan, as allowed by applicable law and as approved by their respective legislative body. The maximum bonded indebtedness shall not exceed the projected 30-year distribution of the City's annual allocation and any costs associated with the issuance of such bonds shall be accounted for within the program category in which the bond proceeds are used. 7. Reporting Requirements. a. In order to ensure consistency in distribution, reporting, oversight, and administration of the funds generated by the Ordinance as set forth in Section 12- 67(B) of the Ordinance, annual reports to the Oversight Committee shall be made by the City not later than December 31st of each year in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. b. If the City receives funding as part of the Countywide Expenditures from the Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association ("SCFCA") pursuant to Section 12- 66(C)(6) of the Ordinance, the City shall prepare an annual report to be provided to SCFCA no later than September 30th to be included in the SCFCA's annual report to the Oversight Committee. 8. Appropriations Limit. As provided in Section 12-64 of the Ordinance, revenue generated by the Ordinance shall be attributed to the appropriations limit of the County, and not to the appropriations limit of any Recipients. 9. Records. The Parties shall retain all records regarding expenditures of funds generated by the Ordinance for a period of three (3) years from the date of the expenditure and make available as soon as practicable to each Party. 10. Audit authority of Oversight Committee. Subject to Sections 12-67(C) and 12-67(D) of the Ordinance, the Oversight Committee shall have the authority to audit the receipt and expenditures as set forth in the annual reports submitted by Recipients. 11. Over Allocation. If the County over allocates funds to the City for any reason, then the City agrees to return the amount of such over allocation to COUNTY to be re -allocated per Section 12-66(D). 12. County Costs. As provided in Section 12-66(C)(5), the Parties agree the County is authorized to allocate funds collected pursuant to the Ordinance to pay for expenses incurred which relate to the implementation of the tax, including payments necessary for the operation of the Oversight Committee and Ordinance reporting. The Parties further agree that any costs that exceed the County of Sonoma ACTTC Administrative Fee allocation as set forth in Section 12-66(D) shall be removed from the total tax proceeds prior to distribution of funds to all respective agencies. 13. Indemnification. The City shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officers, officials, and employees, from and against any and all demands, claims, actions, litigation or other proceedings, liability, damages and costs (including but not limited to attorney fees), that arise out of, pertain to or relate in whole or in part to the County's obligations under this agreement, excepting only matters that are based upon the County's gross negligence or willful misconduct. 14. Notices. Any notice which may be required under this Agreement shall be in writing, shall be effective when received, and shall be given by personal service, or by certified or register mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses set forth below, or to such addresses which may be specified in writing to the parties hereto. TO CITY: City of Rohnert Park Finance Director 130 Avram Avenue Rohnert Park, CA 94928 TO COUNTY: County of Sonoma Auditor -Controller -Treasurer -Tax Collector 585 Fiscal Drive, #100 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 15. Additional Acts and Documents. Each party agrees to do all such things and take all such actions, and to make, execute and deliver such other documents and instruments, as shall be reasonably requested to carry out the provisions, intent and purpose of this Agreement. 16. Integration. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No representations, warranties, inducements or oral agreements have been made by any of the Parties except as expressly set forth herein, or in other contemporaneous written agreements. 17. Amendment. This Agreement may not be changed, modified or rescinded except in writing, signed by all parties hereto, and any attempt at oral modification of this Agreement shall be void and of no effect. .19 18. Independent Agencies. The Parties renders their services under this Agreement as independent agencies. None of either Party's agents or employees shall be agents or employees of the other Party. 19. Assignment. The Agreement may not be assigned, transferred, hypothecated or pledged by any party without the express written consent of the other party. 20. Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successor(s), assignee(s) or transferee(s) of the County or the City as the case may be. This provision shall not be construed as an authorization to assign, transfer, hypothecate or pledge this Agreement other than as provided above. Notwithstanding the foregoing, per Section 12-66(E)(2) of the Ordinance, in the event any enumerated entity in Section 12-66(D) consolidates with or is annexed by another entity, the successor agency shall receive the funds allocated to the enumerated entity. 21. Severability. Should any part of this Agreement be determined to be unenforceable, invalid, or beyond the authority of either party to enter into or carry out, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement which shall continue in full force and effect; provided that, the remainder of this Agreement can, absent the excised portion, be reasonably interpreted to give effect to the intensions of the Parties. 22. Limitations. a. All obligations of the County under the terms of this Agreement are expressly subject to the County's continued authorization to collect and allocate the sales tax proceeds generated by the Ordinance. If for any reason the County's right to collect or expend such sales tax proceeds is terminated, suspended, or modified, in whole or in part, the County shall promptly notify the City, and the parties shall consult on a course of action. If, after twenty-five (25) business days, a course of action is not agreed upon by the parties, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated by mutual or joint consent; provided, that any future obligation to fund from the date of the notice shall be expressly limited by and subject to (i) the lawful ability of the County to expend sales tax proceeds for the purposes of the Agreement; and (ii) the availability, taking into consideration all the obligations of the County under all outstanding contracts, agreements to other obligations of COUNTY, of funds for such purposes. b. All obligations of the City under the terms of this Agreement are expressly subject to the City's continued authorization to receive and spend the sales tax proceeds generated by the Ordinance. If for any reason the City's right or ability to collect or expend such sales tax proceeds is terminated, suspended, or modified, in whole or in part, the City shall promptly notify the County, and the 5 parties shall consult on a course of action. If, after twenty-five (25) business days, a course of action is not agreed upon by the parties, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated by mutual or joint consent; provided, that any future obligation to fund from the date of the notice shall be expressly limited by and subject to (i) the lawful ability of the City to expend sales tax proceeds for the purposes of the Agreement; and (ii) the availability, taking into consideration all the obligations of the City under all outstanding contracts, agreements to other obligations of the City, of funds for such purposes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. COUNTY OF SONOMA Board of Supervisors, Chairperson ATTEST: By: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM FOR COUNTY: County Counsel CITY OF ROHNERT PARK By: Marcela Piedra, City Manager Sylvia Lopez Cuevas, City Clerk FOR CITY: Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney 2 EXHIBIT A ANNUAL REPORT TO MEASURE H OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Pursuant to the requirements of Sonoma County Code section 12-67(B), this is the annual report of the allocation of funds received by the reporting agency under the Sonoma County voter -approved Measure H, "The Improved and Enhanced Local Fire Protection, Paramedic Services and Disaster Response Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance" ("Ordinance"). Name of Agency receiving Measure H funds: Reporting period: FY 24-25 (4/26/24 to 6/30/25 (with April -June proceeds received 9/10/25)) 1. Detail of the activities related to the Ordinance this reporting period, based on attached budget to actual report, balance sheet, and fund balance report. 2. Summary of the positions and start up, equipment and facilities that were funded with revenue from the Ordinance. 3. The specific activities that support fire prevention, including vegetation management. 4. Update on the status of facility capital improvement projects that are funded with revenue from the Ordinance. 5. Demonstration of compliance with the requirement that revenue from the Ordinance shall be used for enhancing operations. Proportional budget allocation for fire related services: FY 21-22 $ ; FY 21-22 %; this reporting period: $ %. Personnel expenditures: FY 21-22 $ ; this reporting period $ 6. Any material changes in service needs within the agency's jurisdiction or countywide. 7. Any remaining funds from allocations provided in previous years, and an explanation for proposed use of such funds. 7 Required Attachments: Annual Budget Budget to Actual Report Balance Sheet Fund Balance Report Most recent annual audit and/or other independent financial review FY 21-22 budget documents showing baseline dollar figure for maintenance of effort and personnel expenditures. ITEM NO. 9.A. (00 Mission Statement "We Carefor Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Communityfor Today and Tomorrow. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: January 28, 2025 Department: Public Works Submitted By: Vanessa Garrett, Director of Public Works Prepared By: Amanda Bunte, Operations Manager — General Services Agenda Title: Receive an Informational Presentation Regarding the City's Tree Inventory and Resource Analysis Report by Davey Resource Group RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive an informational presentation regarding the Tree Inventory and Resource Analysis Report by Davey Resource Group. BACKGROUND: The City of Rohnert Park Draft 2040 General Plan was released on July 20, 2022 for public review. The Draft General Plan outlines the goals, policies, and programs the City will pursue looking forward to 2040 on a wide range of topics, such as Climate Change, Environmental Justice, and Community Development. Within the 2040 General Plan's Community Development Element, it identifies a need for the City to prepare and update every five years an Urban Forest Master Plan (Plan). Part of the Plan includes an inventory of the City's existing trees, identification of the types of trees appropriate to Rohnert Park's natural environment and mapped locations in the City that would benefit most from tree plantings with the goal of increasing the tree canopy substantially over the next General Plan life cycle. The City prepared a Request for Proposals on July 25, 2023 to solicit consultants to perform work that includes: oo Inventorying the existing tree and collecting data about their condition and maintenance needs. oo Mapping the existing locations. Analyze the collected data to identify trends, patterns, and key findings related to the city's urban tree canopy. Prepare a detailed report presenting the assessment results, including recommendations for tree management, preservation, and enhancement strategies. Prepare a prioritization and timeline schedule in conjunction with the City for trees that are dead, or beyond the point of being recovered. Three proposals were received and the selection committee selected Davey Resource Group. On November 141h, 2023 City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a Master Agreement with Davey Resource Group. 4895-3538-4453 v1 ITEM NO. 9.A. The Notice to Proceed was issued February 22, 2024 and the complete inventory and report were received in October 2024. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this item is to inform the Council of our Tree Inventory and Analysis Results. A copy of the complete report is Attachment 1. The tree inventory found that the City of Rohnert Park currently has 16,027 community trees. This is estimated to provide 513.4 acres of canopy cover, which is nearly 11.5% of all land cover. Of that, 178 unique tree species are represented; however 32% of all trees are Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood). The widely accepted rule that no species in an urban forest should exceed 10%. The inventory also found that 419 (2.6%) of the trees are recommended for removal. Annual benefits of the community trees include 1 million gallons of stormwater runoff diverted, 3.3 tons of air pollutants removed, and 151 tons of carbon sequestered. In order to address the priority deferred maintenance 1,241 trees (7.74%) need to be either removed or pruned. Recommended Maintenance #of Trees o of Trees Priority 1 Removal 85 0.53 Priority 1 Pruning 155 0.97 Priority 2 Removal 192 1.20 Priority 2 Pruning 667 4.16 Priority 3 Removal 142 0.89 Palm Prune 15 0.09 Large Tree Routine Prune 11,333 70.71 Small Tree Routine Prune 2,899 18.09 None 32 16,027 0.09 100% ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Presentation of a Tree Inventory and Management Analysis is not subject to the California Environmental Protection Act. This is not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) STRATEGIC PLAN AND COUNCIL PRIORITIES ALIGNMENT: The Urban Forest Resource Analysis and Management Strategies Report aligns with the following City Council multi -year broad goals and strategic plan priorities: 4895-3538-4453 v1 ITEM NO. 9.A. oo Planning and Infrastructure: Tree Inventory and Analysis Report assists in maintaining City's existing infrastructure in a safe and proactive manner so that the community can continue to benefit from beautiful trees and the urban forest. This data helps inform decisions for reaching our General Plan Canopy Cover Goal. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: None, this is for informational purposes. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: None. Department Head Approval Date: 01/13/2025 City Attorney Approval Date: N/A Finance Director Approval Date: N/A City Manager Approval Date: 01/15/2025 Attachments: 1. Urban Forest Resource Analysis and Management Strategies 2024 Report by Davey Resource Group 4895-3538-4453 v1 •ate ' yrr Rp,-Qniircp Rrn Rohnert Park, CA Community Tree Resource Analysis and Maintenance Report 2024 �avEr Prepared for: City of Rohnert Park Parks and Urban Forestry 130 Avram Ave. Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Prepared by: Davey Resource Group, Inc. 1 S00 North Mantua St. Resource Group Kent, OH 44240 www.davey.com/drg Acknowledgments This project is funded in part by CAL FIRE through the Urban and Community Forestry California Climate Investments grant program. While the specific reports and recommendations can be attributed to this study, the basis for its structure and written content come from the entire series of Municipal Forest Resource Analysis reports prepared and published by the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Center for Urban Forest Research, and credit should be given to those authors. The Municipal Forest Resource Analysis Reports are companions to the regional Tree Guides and i-Tree's Eco application developed by the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Center for Public Urban Forest Research. Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary...................................................................................................................................................................1 Structure................................................................................................................................................................................1 Maintenance........................................................................................................................................................................1 Benefits..................................................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................................3 ResourceStructure....................................................................................................................................................................5 SpeciesDiversity................................................................................................................................................................5 ImportanceValue..............................................................................................................................................................7 CanopyCover......................................................................................................................................................................8 StockingLevel.....................................................................................................................................................................8 RelativeAge Distribution................................................................................................................................................9 Tree Condition & Relative Performance................................................................................................................11 Relative Performance Index................................................................................................................................11 ReplacementValue........................................................................................................................................................13 ResourceBenefits...................................................................................................................................................................15 AirQuality..........................................................................................................................................................................15 Deposition, Interception, & Avoided Pollutants.........................................................................................16 Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reductions.............................................................................................................18 Stormwater Runoff Reductions.................................................................................................................................20 EnergySavings.................................................................................................................................................................22 Electricity & Natural Gas Reductions..............................................................................................................22 Aesthetic, Property Value, & Socioeconomic Benefits..................................................................................... 23 CalculatingTree Benefits.............................................................................................................................................23 Annual Benefits of Most Prevalent Species..........................................................................................................23 NetAnnual Benefits....................................................................................................................................................... 26 Pestand Pathogen Threats.................................................................................................................................................27 PestManagement..........................................................................................................................................................29 ResourceMaintenance Needs...........................................................................................................................................31 MaintenanceNeeds.......................................................................................................................................................31 PrimaryDefects...............................................................................................................................................................32 Clearence and Inspections..........................................................................................................................................33 Tree Inventory Management Plan................................................................................................................................... 35 Funding.............................................................................................................................................................................. 35 WorkPlan.......................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Summary of Work for Years 1 through 5...................................................................................................... 36 PlantingPlan....................................................................................................................................................................40 TreePlanting Strategies...............................................................................................................................................40 TreeMaintenance Strategies.....................................................................................................................................41 AppendixA: References.......................................................................................................................................................43 AppendixB: Methods...........................................................................................................................................................47 i-Tree Eco Model and Field Measurements..........................................................................................................47 Definitionsand Calculations.......................................................................................................................................47 RiskAssessment..............................................................................................................................................................48 AppendixC: Tables................................................................................................................................................................ SO Figures Figure 1: Quantified Annual Benefits from the Community Tree Resource.......................................................2 Figure 2: Species Diversity in Rohnert Park's Community Tree Resource...........................................................6 Figure 3: Community Tree Inventory Relative Age Distribution..............................................................................9 Figure 4: Relative Age Distribution of Rohnert Park's Top 10 Most Prevalent Species..............................10 Figure5: Tree Condition......................................................................................................................................................11 Figure 6: Annual Air Pollution Benefits..........................................................................................................................15 Figure 7: Top 5 Species for Air Pollution Removal Benefits...................................................................................17 Figure 8: Top 5 Species for Carbon Benefits................................................................................................................19 Figure 9: Trees Reduce Stormwater Runoff..................................................................................................................20 Figure 10: Top 5 Species for Stormwater Benefits.....................................................................................................21 Figure 11: Summary of Annual Benefits for Most Prevalent Species.................................................................24 Figure 12: Annual Environmental Benefits....................................................................................................................26 Tables Table 1: Population Summary of Rohnert Park's Most Prevalent Species (representing >1%)..................5 Table 2: Importance Value (IV) of Prevalent Species in Rohnert Park (Representing >1%).........................8 Table 3: Relative Performance Index of Most Prevalent Species.........................................................................12 Table4: Underused Species...............................................................................................................................................13 Table 5: Replacement Value for Most Prevalent Species........................................................................................14 Table 6: Annual Air Pollution Removal Benefits.........................................................................................................16 Table 7: Adverse Health Incidents Avoided Due to Changes in Pollutant Concentration Levels and EconomicValues.....................................................................................................................................................................16 Table 8: Annual Air Quality Benefits by Most Prevalent Species.........................................................................18 Table 9: Annual Carbon Sequestration Benefits by Most Prevalent Species...................................................19 Table 10: Stormwater Benefits by Most Prevalent Tree Species.......................................................................... 21 Table 11: Summary of Annual Benefits of Most Prevalent Species.................................................................... 25 Table 12: Pest & Pathogen Threats to Rohnert Park................................................................................................28 Table 13: Summary of Maintenance Tasks for Community Trees.......................................................................31 Table 14: Summary of Primary Defects of Community Trees................................................................................ 32 Table15: Clearence Required............................................................................................................................................33 Table 16: Further Inspection Required...........................................................................................................................33 Table 18: Quantifiable Benefits and Investments.......................................................................................................35 Table 17: 5-Year Work and Planting Plan..................................................................................................................... 38 Table 19: Likelihood of Failure Matrix............................................................................................................................49 Table20: Risk Rating Matrix...............................................................................................................................................49 Table 21: Botanical and Common Names..................................................................................................................... 50 Table 22: Importance Value (IV) for All Tree Species................................................................................................ 54 Table 23: Condition and RPI for All Tree Species....................................................................................................... 58 Table 24: Annual Benefits for All Species...................................................................................................................... 62 Table25: Replacement Value............................................................................................................................................ 67 Executive Summary Community trees are trees in the public rights -of -way, including trees along streets, in medians, and in parks. They provide numerous tangible and intangible benefits to residents, visitors, and neighboring communities. The city recognizes that trees are a valued resource, a critical component of the urban infrastructure, and a significant part of the community's identity. In 2024, the City of Rohnert Park contracted with Davey Resource Group, Inc. (DRG) to conduct an inventory of community trees. The tree inventory data was used in conjunction with i-Tree Eco benefit - cost modeling software to develop a detailed and quantified analysis of the current structure, function, benefits, and value of the community tree resource. This report details the results of that analysis. It is important to note that this analysis only includes public trees. Structure Structural analysis is the first step towards understanding the benefits provided by community trees as well as their management needs. Rohnert Park's community tree inventory includes 16,027 trees, and 963 vacant sites and stumps. Considering species composition, diversity, and age distribution. The following information characterizes Rohnert Park's existing community tree inventory: • 178 unique tree species are represented. The top three most prevalent species are: Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood, 32.61/o) Quercus agrifo(ia (coastal live oak, 7.0%), and P(atanus x hybrida (London planetree, 6.3%). These species account for 45.9% of the community tree resource. • 34.0% of trees are 8 inches in diameter (DBH') or less and 17.7% of trees are larger than 24 inches in diameter. • 93.3% of trees are in fair or better condition. • 419 (2.6%) trees are recommended for removal. • Community trees are estimated to provide 513.4 acres of canopy cover, which is nearly 11.5% of all land cover. • To date, Rohnert Park's community trees are storing 9,364 tons of carbon in woody and foliar biomass. • To replace Rohnert Park's 16,027 community trees with trees of equivalent size, species, and condition, would cost nearly $61.1 million. • Approximately 91.7% of trees are at risk to pests and pathogens, including polyphagous shot hole borer, sudden oak death, defoliating moths, and spotted lanternfly. • The stocking level of Rohnert Park's community tree resource is 94.3%. Maintenance Along with structural analysis the development of a proactive maintenance program can help address defects earlier and keep trees healthier while creating a more predictable workload and cost schedule. This predictability can help managers achieve their goals for the urban forest in the most ' DBH: Diameter at Breast Height. DBH represents the diameter of the tree when measured at 1.4 meters (4.5 feet) above ground (U.S.A. standard). Executive Summary efficient way possible. Based on maintenance needs described in the inventory, the following information characterizes Rohnert Park's existing community tree resource: • Annually, the City invests approximately $93,928 ($5.86/tree, $2.29/capita) in management. • 14,232 trees are recommended for routine pruning 155 trees are recommended for priority 1 prune • 667 trees are recommended for priority 2 prune 85 trees are recommended for priority 1 removal 334 trees are recommended for priority 2 and 3 removal • 507 trees are recommended for training pruning Benefits Many of the benefits from urban trees cannot be accurately quantified with current formulas and peer - reviewed consensus. Numerous studies indicate that urban trees provide a multitude of critical benefits to natural ecosystems, economies, and human health and welfare. Currently, i- Tree Eco is limited to quantifying the benefits from trees to air quality, stormwater runoff reduction, carbon sequestration, and energyz. Annually, community trees provide quantifiable benefits to Rohnert Park totaling $77,098. The average annual per tree benefit is $4.81. These benefits include: Carbon Sequestraion ($/yr•) $25,701 33.3% 4, mi Pollution Removal ($/yr•) $42,226 54.8% Avoided Runoff ($/yr•) $9,172 11.9% 1.0 million gallons of avoided stormwater Figure 1: Quantified Annual Benefits from the runoff, valued at $9,172, an average of Community Tree Resource $0.57 per tree. • 3.3 tons of air pollution removed, improving air quality, and reducing adverse health incidents for a value of $42,226, an average of $2.63 per tree. • 150.7 tons of carbon directly sequestered, valued at $25,701, an average of $1.60 per tree. z Energy benefits cannot be quantified for Newman's community trees as the inventory data does not include the cardinal direction and distance of each tree to the nearest dwelling. Executive Summary 2 Introduction Rohnert Park, California, is a charming community nestled in the heart of Sonoma County. Rohnert Park offers a blend of beauty, rich history, and agricultural heritage. Founded in 1888, a centrally located park was the focal point of the city and the community expanded around this park. Rohnert Park has grown from a modest settlement to a vibrant community while retaining its small-town charm. Today the city manages 16,027 public trees, whilst expanding the forestry department and services to better serve the community. Rohnert Park enjoys a Mediterranean climate with mild winters and hot, dry summers. During the summer months, temperatures average a high of 837 and a low of 507. In the winter, daily average temperatures hover around 61°F. The city receives about 12 inches of annual precipitation, primarily between November and April (Weatherspark, 2023). This climate makes Rohnert Park an ideal setting for outdoor activities and exploring the surrounding picturesque landscapes. Urban trees play an essential role in the community providing many benefits, tangible and intangible, to residents, visitors, and neighboring communities. Research demonstrates that healthy urban trees can improve the local environment and lessen the impact resulting from urbanization and industry (Center for Urban Forest Research, 2017). Trees improve air quality, reduce energy consumption, help manage stormwater, reduce erosion, provide critical habitat for wildlife, and promote a connection with nature. When taken together, the community forest contributes to a healthier, more livable, and prosperous Rohnert Park. The community tree inventory (public trees) was analyzed with i-Tree Eco benefit -cost modeling software (v6.0.35) to generate the data for this resource analysis. The software uses inventory data collected in the field along with local hourly air pollution and meteorological data to quantify urban forest structure, environmental effects, and value to the community. The program is a central computing engine that makes scientifically sound estimates of the effects of the urban forest using peer -reviewed equations to predict environmental and economic benefits. Aesthetic, human health, socio-economic, property value, and wildlife benefits are not calculated as part of this study although they are certainly part of the important benefits provided by Rohnert Park's community tree resource. This report provides an assessment of the structure and composition of the current community tree inventory, consisting of 16,027 trees. Where possible, it also quantifies the benefits derived from the tree resource. This baseline data can be used to make effective resource management decisions, develop policy, and set priorities. Ultimately, the results of the analysis allow the City of Rohnert Park to better understand, prioritize, and manage the community tree resource. This summary report provides the following information: • A description of the current structure and management needs of the community tree resource and an established baseline for future management decisions. • Quantifiable economic value of benefits from the community tree resource to air quality, stormwater runoff reduction, and carbon sequestration. • Data that may be used by resource managers in the pursuit of alternative funding sources, local assessment fees, legislative initiatives, and collaborative relationships with utility purveyors, non -governmental organizations, air quality districts, watershed managers, and federal and state agencies. 3 Introduction Work plans that will aid Rohnert Park in making steps to more proactively manage the community tree resource. Trees are of vital importance to the environmental, social, and economic well-being of the community. Introduction 4 Resource Structure A tree resource is more thoroughly understood through examination of its composition and structure. Consideration of stocking level, species diversity, canopy cover, age distribution, condition, and performance provide a foundation for planning and strategic management. Inferences based on this data can help managers understand the importance of individual trees and species populations to the overall forest as it exists today and provide a basis to plan for and project the future potential of the resource. Species Diversity Species diversity is calculated as the proportion of species representing the total community tree resource (Table 1, Figure 2). Rohnert Park's community tree resource includes a mix of 178 unique species (Appendix Q. Of these species, 45% are native to California and 62% are native to North America. The species diversity in Rohnert Park's community tree resource is slightly lower than the mean of 185 species reported from 18 California communities (Muller and Bornstein, 2010). Table 1: Population Summary of Rohnert Park's Most Prevalent Species (representing > 1 %) Sequoia sempervirens Quercus agrifolia Platanus x hybrida Pistacia chinensis Salix spp. Quercus rubra Pyrus colleryona Acer rubrum Ligustrum lucidum Liriodendron tulipifera Fraxinus angustifolia Liquidambar styraciflua Gleditsia triacanthos Logerstroemia indica Prunus cerasifera Platanus occidentalis Quercus lobata all other species 5,222 32.58 42 178 371 1,091 1,358 1,102 653 292 89 47 1127 7.03 168 392 270 210 55 23 5 3 1 0 1,011 6.31 109 167 300 264 114 47 8 2 0 0 947 5.91 688 175 73 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 671 4.19 33 109 198 207 76 35 9 5 0 0 481 3.00 273 49 84 53 15 6 1 0 0 0 454 2.83 26 157 106 105 53 7 0 0 0 0 446 2.78 345 49 22 14 10 5 1 0 0 0 354 2.21 37 121 72 92 26 6 0 0 0 0 350 2.18 225 69 17 30 9 0 0 0 0 0 319 1.99 5 62 76 116 51 7 2 0 0 0 295 1.84 9 58 115 81 27 5 0 0 0 0 242 1.51 0 46 96 85 15 0 0 0 0 0 238 1.48 154 64 19 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 173 1.08 40 71 37 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 162 1.01 0 11 37 87 23 1 2 0 0 1 161 1.00 56 44 12 14 20 9 0 1 3 2 3,374 21.05 590 760 585 543 290 211 135 60 33 25 Three species in the inventory are considered invasive according to California Invasive Species Advisory Committee, including, Eucalyptus globulus (blue gum eucalyptus) Triadica sebifera (Chinese tallow) and Schinus molle (California peppertree). Managers should monitor areas with existing stands and 5 Resource Structure 0 a u v a tA evaluate whether management strategies are necessary to prevent undesirable spread. New and replacement plantings should avoid species identified as invasive. Sequoia sempervirens Quercus agrifolia Platanus x hybrida Pistacia chinensis Salix - 4.2% Quercus rubra - 3.0% Pyrus calleryana - 2.8% Acer rubrum - 2.8% Ligustrum lucidum _ 2.2% Liriodendron tulipifera 2.2% Froxinus angustifolia 2.0% Liquidambarstyrociflua 1.8% Gleditsio triocanthos 1.5% Lagerstroemia indica 1.5% Prunus cerasifera 1.1% Platanus occidentalis 1.0% Quercus lobata 1.0% all other species - 7.0% 6.3 % 5.9% 21.1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% % of Pop. Figure 2: Species Diversity in Rohnert Park's Community Tree Resource 30% 32.6% 35% Maintaining diversity in an urban forest is important. Dominance of any single species or genus can have detrimental consequences in the event of drought, disease, pests, or other species - specific stressors that can severely impact a tree resource and the flow of benefits and costs over time. Catastrophic pests and diseases, such as polyphagous shot hole borer (Euwaiiacea nov. sp.), emerald ash borer (Agri(us p(anipennis), and sudden oak death (Phytophthora ramorum) are some examples of unexpected, devastating, and costly examples that highlight the importance of diversity and the balanced distribution of species and genera. Recognizing that all tree species have a potential vulnerability to pests and disease, urban forest managers have long followed a rule of thumb that no single species should represent greater than 10% of the total population and no single genus more than 20% (Santamour, 1990). In Rohnert Park's community tree population, Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood, 32.6%) exceeds this widely accepted rule at the species level. In Rohnert Park, no genera or family exceeds the recommendation. Managers should continue to strive for increased diversity to promote greater resiliency and reduce the risk of a significant loss in benefits should any species become a liability. Resource Structure 6 Importance Value To quantify the significance of any one species in Rohnert Park's community tree resource, an importance value (IV) is derived for each species. Importance values are particularly meaningful to urban forest managers because they indicate a reliance on the functional capacity (i.e., benefits) of a species. i-Tree Eco calculates importance value based on the sum of two values: percentage of total population and percentage of total leaf area. Importance value goes beyond tree numbers alone to suggest reliance on specific species based on the benefits they provide. The importance value can range from zero (which implies no reliance) to 200 (suggesting total reliance). A complete table, with importance values for all species, is included in Appendix C. To reiterate, research strongly suggests that no single species should dominate the composition of an urban forest. Because importance value goes beyond population numbers, it can help managers to better comprehend the resulting loss of benefits from a loss of any one species. When importance values are comparatively equal among the 10 to 15 most prevalent species, the risk of a significant reduction in benefits is reduced. Of course, suitability of the dominant species is another important consideration. Planting short-lived or poorly adapted species can result in short rotations and increased long-term management costs. Table 2 lists the importance values of the most prevalent species in Rohnert Park's community tree resource. These 17 species represent 79.0% of the overall population and 81.0% of the total leaf area for a combined importance value of 162.1. Rohnert Park relies most heavily on Sequoia sempervirens (Coast redwood, IV=91.0), followed by Quercus agrifolia (coast live oak, IV=12.4), and Platanus x hybrida (London planetree, IV=12.9). Together these three species represent 45.9% of the inventory and have a combined importance value of 116.3 (58.2% of the total). For some species, low importance values are primarily a function of species stature and/or age distribution. Immature trees and small -stature species frequently have lower importance values than their representation in the inventory might suggest. This is due to their relatively small leaf area and canopy coverage. For example, Prunus cerasifera (cherry plum), which represents 1.1% of the overall resource and 0.2% of overall leaf area, currently has an importance value of 1.3 (0.6% of IV). Most of the P. cerasifera population is less than 8 inches in diameter (64%) but due to the small stature of this species, the importance value is not likely to increase significantly over time. In contrast, Acer rubrum (red maple) represents 3.0% of the resource and 1.1 % of overall leaf area and has a current importance value of 4.1. However, 88% of the population of this medium/large stature species is currently under 8 inches in diameter. As A. rubrum trees mature and increase in canopy (leaf area), the importance value of the species is likely to increase significantly over time. Some species are more significant contributors to the urban forest than population numbers would suggest. For example, Eucalyptus nicholii (willow -leaved gimlet) represents less than 1% of the population and 2.7% of overall leaf area and has an importance value of 3.1. This is a great example of how large stature trees can have significant impacts on an urban forest with minimal representation. 7 Resource Structure Table 2: Importance Value (IV) of Prevalent Species in Rohnert Park (Representing > 1 %) Sequoia sempervirens 5,222 32.58 58.44 91.02 Quercus agrifolia 1,127 7.03 5.36 12.39 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 6.31 6.61 12.92 Pistacia chinensis 947 5.91 0.51 6.42 Salix spp. 671 4.19 1.97 6.16 Quercus rubra 481 3.00 1.13 4.13 Pyrus calleryana 454 2.83 1.09 3.93 Acer rubrum 446 2.78 0.42 3.20 Ligustrum lucidum 354 2.21 1.36 3.57 Liriodendron tulipifera 350 2.18 0.44 2.63 Fraxinus angustifolia 319 1.99 1.54 3.53 Liquidambar styraciflua 295 1.84 1.18 3.02 Gleditsia triacanthos 242 1.51 0.95 2.46 Lagerstroemia indica 238 1.48 0.09 1.57 Prunus cerasifera 173 1.08 0.19 1.27 Platanus occidentalis 162 1.01 1.08 2.09 Quercus lobata 161 1.00 0.78 1.78 all other species 3,374 21.05 16.86 37.91 Canopy Cover Rohnert Park covers an area of 4,480 acres (7.0 square miles). i-Tree Eco estimates that community trees provide approximately 513.4 canopy acres which accounts for nearly 11.5% of the total land area. Stocking Level Currently, Rohnert Park's community tree resource has 963 available planting sites, including 841 vacant sites and 122 stumps. Considering the tree inventory identified 16,027 existing trees and 963 available planting sites, there are 16,990 total planting sites for community trees. As a result, the estimated stocking level for Rohnert Park's community tree resource is currently 94.3%. Resource Structure 8 Relative Age Distribution Age distribution can be approximated by considering the DBH range of the overall inventory and of individual species. Trees with smaller diameters tend to be younger. It is important to note that palms do not increase in DBH over time and that height more accurately correlates to age. The distribution of individual tree ages within a tree population influences present and future costs as well as the flow of benefits. An ideally aged population allows managers to allocate annual maintenance costs uniformly over many years and assures continuity in overall tree canopy coverage and associated benefits. A desirable distribution has a high proportion of young trees to offset establishment and age -related mortality as the percentage of older trees declines over time (Richards, 1982/83). This ideal, albeit uneven, distribution suggests a large fraction of trees (-40%) should be young, with a DBH less than eight inches, while only 10% should be in the large diameter classes (>24 inches DBH). The age distribution of Rohnert Park's community tree resource shows a nearly ideal population distribution with slight under representation in age classes 0-4 inches and greater than 36 inches. A total of 34.0% of all trees are less than 8 inches in diameter and 17.7% are greater than 24 inches in diameter (Figure 3). 25% 20% Ideal Age Distribution Total Population 0-4 4-8 8-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42-48 48+ DBH Class (inches) Figure 3: Community Tree Inventory Relative Age Distribution Relative age distribution can also be evaluated for individual species. The 10 most prevalent community tree species are compared against the ideal distribution in Figure 4. Currently P(atanus x hybrida (London planetree) and Sa(ix spp. (willow species) most resemble an ideal age distribution, though are more heavily weighted in the 8-toll 8 inch DBH classes than the ideal. Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood) has significant representation in established and mature DBH ranges (>18 inches DBH) and relatively few smaller trees. While the age distribution of this species does not mirror the ideal age distribution, it still has a stable population. The age distribution of Pistacia chinensis (Chinese pistache), Quercus rubra (northern red oak), Liriodendron tulipifera (tulip tree) and Acer rubrum (red maple) show a high proportion of trees in smaller diameter classes (<8 inches DBH). While the age distribution of these species does not mirror the ideal age distribution, over time and with successional plantings, their populations may begin to mirror the ideal age distribution. 9 Resource Structure 80% 70% 60% 20% 10% 0% 80% 70% = 60% O 50% 3 C 40% a c 30% 20% 10% 0% Ideal Age Distribution Sequoia sempervirens Quercus agrifolia Platanus x hybrida Pistocia chinensis Salix spp. 0-4 4-8 8-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42-48 48+ DBH Class (inches) Ideal Age Distribution Quercus rubra Pyrus calleryana Acer rubrum Ligustrum lucidum Liriodendron tulipifera 0-4 4-8 8-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42-48 48+ DBH Class (inches) Figure 4: Relative Age Distribution of Rohnert Park's Top 10 Most Prevalent Species Analysis of the age distribution of prevalent species can help resource managers to understand and foresee maintenance activities and budgetary needs. In addition to informing managers of the economics of prevalent species, managers can use the age distribution to determine trends in plantings and adopt strategies for species selection in the years to come. Resource Structure 10 Tree Condition & Relative Performance Tree condition is an indication of how well trees managed and how well they are performing in the region and in each site -specific environment (e.g., street, median, parking lot, etc.). Condition ratings can help managers anticipate maintenance and funding needs. In addition, tree condition is an important factor for the calculation of resource benefits. A condition rating of good assumes that a tree has no major structural problems, no significant mechanical damage, and may have only minor aesthetic, insect, disease, or structural problems, and is in good health. When trees performing at their peak, as those rated as good or b the benefits they provide are maximized. are t Fair 41-60% 42.5 % Poor 21-40% 4.7 % Very Poor 6-20% air <1% Dead 0-5% 1.3 % Figure 5: Tree Condition Excellent 81-100% <1% Based on the inventory data (2024), community trees in Rohnert Park are in overall fair or better condition (93.3%). Approximately 4.7% of trees are in poor condition and 1.3% are dead (Figure 5). Relative Performance Index The relative performance index (RPI) is one way to further analyze the condition and suitability of a specific tree species. The RPI provides an urban forest manager with a detailed perspective on how different species perform compared to each other. The index compares the condition ratings of each tree species with the condition rating of every other tree species within the inventory. An RPI of 1.0 or better indicates that the species is performing as well or better than average. An RPI value below 1.0 indicates that the species is underperforming in comparison to the rest of the population. Among Rohnert Park's most prevalent tree species, 10 have an RPI of 1 or greater (Table 3). Pistacia chinensis (Chinese pistache) has the highest RPI at 1.06 whereas Solix spp. (willow species) has the lowest RPI of 0.87. The most abundant species, Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood) has an RPI of 1.03. The RPI can be a useful tool for urban forest managers as an indicator of environmental suitability for species selection. If a community has been planting two or more new species, the RPI can be used to compare their relative performance. If the RPI indicates that one is performing relatively poorly, managers may decide to reduce or even stop planting that species and subsequently save money on both planting stock and replacement costs. For example, Robinia pseudoacacia (black locust) has an RPI of 0.90 and Quercus ilex (holly oak) has an RPI of 1.08. The data indicates that both medium/large statured species have representation similar to an ideal age distribution. Between the two species, the RPI indicates that Q. ilex is performing better in Rohnert Park. The RPI enables managers to look at the performance of long-standing species as well. Established species with an RPI of 1.00 or greater have performed well over time. These top performers should be retained, and planted, as a healthy proportion of the overall population. It is important to keep in mind that, because RPI is based on condition at the time of the inventory, it may not reflect cosmetic or nuisance issues, especially seasonal issues that are not threatening the health or structure of the trees. 11 Resource Structure Table 3: Relative Performance Index of Most Prevalent Species Sequoia sempervirens 5,222 32.58 0.10 64.60 29.90 2.90 0.80 1.80 1.03 Quercus agrifolia 1,127 7.03 0.30 53.30 44.00 2.40 0.00 0.00 1.02 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 6.31 1.80 62.70 33.00 2.20 0.10 0.20 1.05 Pistacia chinensis 947 5.91 0.00 67.80 31.00 0.80 0.20 0.10 1.06 Salix spp. 671 4.19 0.00 9.50 70.60 17.30 0.70 1.80 0.87 Quercus rubra 481 3.00 0.40 54.10 40.70 3.10 0.60 1.00 1.01 Pyrus calleryana 454 2.83 0.00 21.60 73.80 4.20 0.20 0.20 0.94 Acer rubrum 446 2.78 0.00 63.50 33.90 1.80 0.40 0.40 1.04 Ligustrum lucidum 354 2.21 0.00 31.60 59.30 6.20 1.70 1.10 0.95 Liriodendron tulipifera 350 2.18 0.00 56.90 38.60 2.00 0.60 2.00 1.02 Fraxinus angustifolia 319 1.99 0.00 6.90 76.50 14.70 0.90 0.90 0.88 Liquidambar styraciflua 295 1.84 0.00 40.30 54.20 4.70 0.70 0.00 0.98 Gleditsia triacanthos 242 1.51 0.00 71.90 19.80 7.90 0.00 0.40 1.05 Lagerstroemia indica 238 1.48 0.40 54.20 39.50 2.50 1.70 1.70 1.01 Prunus cerasifera 173 1.08 0.00 24.90 63.60 10.40 0.60 0.60 0.93 Platanus occidentalis 162 1.01 0.00 24.10 75.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 Quercus lobata 161 1.00 0.60 60.90 33.50 4.30 0.00 0.60 1.03 all other species 3,374 21.05 0.09 36.13 53.26 7.47 0.77 2.29 0.95 An RPI value less than 1.00 may be indicative of a species that is not well -adapted to local conditions. Poorly adapted species are more likely to present increased safety and maintenance issues. Species with an RPI less than 1.00 should be carefully considered before being selected for future planting choices. However, prior to selecting or deselecting trees based on RPI alone, managers should consider the age distribution of the species, among other factors. A species that has an RPI of less than 1.00 but also has a significant number of trees in larger DBH classes, may simply be exhibiting signs of population senescence. For example, Pinus radiata (Monterey pine), has an RPI of 0.86. With a relatively large number of mature trees, (44.0% are larger than 24 inches in diameter) the low RPI is likely reflective of many of these trees reaching the end of their useful life. A complete table, with RPI values for all species, is included in Appendix C. RPI is also helpful for identifying underused species that are demonstrating reliable performance. Species with an RPI value greater than 1.00 and an established age distribution may indicate their suitability for the local environment. These species should receive consideration for additional planting. Currently there are no good examples close to an ideal age distribution. Managers can expand the current species pallet with select species projected to do well in the area and continue to monitor results. Liriodendron tulipifera (tulip tree) represents 2.2% of the population, has an RPI of 1.02, but is heavily represented by trees less than 8 inches in diameter. Although expected to do well in Rohnert Park, the current age distribution cannot substantiate the high RPI as there are not enough mature trees, resulting in a lack of evidence for long-term performance. Resource Structure 12 Table 4: Underused Species Quercus ilex 76 0.47 1.08 Quercus chrysolepis 20 0.12 1.10 Quercus suber 43 0.27 1.08 Quercus lobata 161 1.00 1.03 Cupressus sempervirens 48 0.30 1.08 Medium Broadleaf Deciduous Aesculus californica 21 0.13 1.00 RPI is most relevant when there is a moderately high representation of the species. In other words, if there is a single individual that has a high RPI (greater than 1.00) but is the only representative of the species at the site, additional trial plantings of the species can help test the accuracy of the RPI. It is important to use RPI as one of many factors for species selection. Species that have historically experienced major issues in Rohnert Park should be avoided and species with a proven track record should be favored. Replacement Value Replacement value accounts for the historical investment in trees over their lifetime and is a way of describing the value of a tree population (and/or average value per tree) at a given time. In other words, the value of a tree is equal to the cost of replacing the tree in its current state (Cullen, 2002). There are several methods available for obtaining a fair and reasonable perception of a tree's value (Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers, 2018; Watson, 2002). For this analysis, the replacement value reflects current population numbers and is based on the valuation procedures of the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers, which uses tree species, diameter, condition, and location information (Nowak et al 2002a; 2002b). To replace all 16,027 community trees in Rohnert Park with trees of equivalent size and condition would cost nearly $61.1 million, an average of $3,810 per tree (Table 5). Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood) has the highest replacement value of approximately $40.2 million and accounts for the greatest proportion of the overall replacement value (65.8%). This can be attributed to species representation in the inventory, the large stature, and well -established age distribution. The replacement value for Rohnert Park's community tree resource reflects the vital importance of these assets to the community. With proper care and maintenance, the value will continue to increase over time. It is important to recognize that replacement values are separate and distinct from the value of annual benefits produced by this resource and in some instances the replacement value of a tree may be greater than or less than the benefits that a particular tree may provide. 13 Resource Structure Table 5. Replacement Value for Most Prevalent Species Sequoia sempervirens 5,222 32.58 40,174,517 65.78 Quercus agrifolia 1,127 7.03 2,647,726 4.34 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 6.31 2,914,259 4.77 Pistacia chinensis 947 5.91 538,742 0.88 Salix spp. 671 4.19 1,030,634 1.69 Quercus rubra 481 3.00 583,094 0.95 Pyrus calleryana 454 2.83 805,412 1.32 Acer rubrum 446 2.78 340,659 0.56 Ligustrum lucidum 354 2.21 577,888 0.95 Liriodendron tulipifera 350 2.18 253,202 0.41 Fraxinus angustifolia 319 1.99 642,086 1.05 Liquidambar styraciflua 295 1.84 656,750 1.08 Gleditsia triacanthos 242 1.51 521,726 0.85 Lagerstroemia indica 238 1.48 148,906 0.24 Prunus cerasifera 173 1.08 169,779 0.28 Platanus occidentalis 162 1.01 474,379 0.78 Quercus lobata 161 1.00 454,821 0.74 all other species 3,374 21.05 8,135,955 13.32 Total 16,027 100% 61,070,537 100% Resource Structure 14 Resource Benefits Community trees continuously mitigate the effects of urbanization and development and protect and enhance the quality of life within the community. The amount and distribution of leaf surface area is the driving force behind the ability of the urban forest to produce benefits for the community (Clark et al, 1997). Healthy trees are vigorous, often producing more leaf surface area each year. Quantifiable benefits from the urban forest are based on the environmental functions trees perform. In addition to air quality benefits, trees slow down stormwater and remove pollutants, reducing the impact of stormwater as well as management costs for municipalities. Tree growth sequesters carbon in woody stems and roots. The economic value of these ecosystem functions is calculated in terms of both volume and cost savings. It is important to note that this assessment accounts for only a small part of all the benefits trees provide. Trees are known to contribute significantly to ecosystems, human health and welfare, and to have positive impacts on economies. Without formulas and peer -reviewed consensus, estimates of the dollar of the value of these benefits are not currently possible. Annual environmental benefits tend to increase with an increase in the number and size of healthy trees (Nowak et al, 2002). Through proper management, urban forest values can be increased over time as trees mature and with improved longevity and as stocking levels are increased. Climate, pests, and weather events can cause values to decrease if the amount of healthy tree cover declines. Excluding energy benefits, the community tree resource provides quantifiable annual environmental benefits valued at approximately $77,098 (Appendix B). Air Quality Urban trees improve air quality in five fundamen- ways: • Absorption of gaseous pollutants such as ozone (03), sulfur dioxide (S02), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) through leaf surfaces • Reduction of emissions from power generation by reducing energy consumption • Increase of oxygen levels through photosynthesis NO2 5117 <1% 12 7 1/0 • Transpiration of water and shade Figure 6. Annual Air Pollution Benefits provision, resulting in lower local air temperatures, thereby reducing ozone levels Interception of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PMio) Air pollutants are known to contribute adversely to human health. Trees decrease the amount of air pollutants in the atmosphere, which can reduce the incidence of numerous negative health effects (Table 6). Ozone is an air pollutant that is particularly harmful to human health. Rohnert Park's community trees reduce adverse health effects associated with ozone by 8 incidents annually, a value of $22,341 (Table 7). Ozone forms when nitrogen oxide from fuel combustion and volatile organic gases from evaporated petroleum products react in the presence of sunshine. In the absence of cooling effects provided by trees, higher temperatures contribute to ozone formation. In addition to 15 Resource Benefits consequences to human health, short-term increases in ozone concentrations are statistically associated with increased tree mortality for 95 large US cities (Bell et al, 2004). Table 6. Annual Air Pollution Removal Benefits Os 4,568.67 22,340.94 PM2.5 83.28 14,728.65 PM10• 1,403.13 4,908.22 NO2 249.68 117.26 CO 152.64 113.58 SO2 94.70 16.95 Table 7: Adverse Health Incidents Avoided Due to Changes in Pollutant Concentration Levels and Economic Values3 Acute Bronchitis 0.00 0.09 Acute Myocardial Infarction 0.00 33.25 Acute Respiratory Symptoms 0.06 2.02 5.75 491.48 0.68 66.90 0.01 0.28 Asthma Exacerbation 0.94 78.70 0.47 37.96 0.08 6.21 Chronic Bronchitis 0.00 143.32 Emergency Room Visits 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.12 Hospital Admissions 0.00 36.25 0.00 86.08 0.00 10.34 Hospital Admissions, 0.00 4.33 Cardiovascular Hospital Admissions, 0.00 2.83 Respiratory Lower Respiratory Symptoms 0.01 0.63 Mortality 0.00 21,570.69 0.00 14,416.91 School Loss Days 1.96 191.91 Upper Respiratory Symptoms 0.01 0.45 Work Loss Days 0.12 21.82 Deposition, Interception, & Avoided Pollutants Each year, 3.3 tons of nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, small particulate matter (PM2.5 and PMlo)4, and ozone are intercepted or absorbed by community trees, for a total value of $42,226. 3 Health effects are not analyzed for each pollutant. Blank values indicate that incidents and their associated values are note estimated for that pollutant and/or health effect (i-Tree Eco User Manual, 2021). 4 PM2.5 is particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (a subset of PMio). These microscopic particles are significant air pollutants and are generally more impactful on human health than PM,o (i-Tree Eco User Manual, 2019). Resource Benefits 16 As a population, Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood) is the greatest contributor to pollutant deposition and interception accounting for 58.4% of the benefit (Table 8). This is directly related to the species prevalence in the overall population and contributions to the overall leaf area (58.4%). The value of air pollutants removed by community trees is $42,226, an average of $2.63 per tree. Among prevalent species Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood $4.73/tree), Platanus occidentalis (American sycamore, $2.81/tree), and Platanus x hybrida (London planetree, $2.76/tree) remove the most pollutants on average per tree (Figure 7). Combined, these three species provide 70.4% of the annual benefit, a total of $29,731 annually. Trees produce oxygen during photosynthesis, and community trees in Rohnert Park produce an estimated 401.8 tons of oxygen annually. Additionally, trees contribute to energy savings by reducing air pollutant emissions (NO2, PM2.5, 5O2, and VOCs) that result from energy production. $5.00 $4.73 $4.00 a a + * $3.00 $2.81 $2.76 a oa $2.04 $2.04 $2.00 Q $1.00 $0.00 Sequoia sempervirens Platanus occidentalis Platanus x hybrida Quercus lobota Fraxinus angustifolia Species Figure 7: Top 5 Species for Air Pollution Removal Benefits While trees do a great deal to absorb air pollutants (especially ozone and particulate matter), they also negatively contribute to air pollution. Trees emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which also contribute to ozone and carbon monoxide formation. The i-Tree Eco analysis accounts for these VOC emissions in the air quality cumulative benefit. Trees in Rohnert Park are estimated to emit 6,374 pounds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (3,295 pounds of isoprene and 3,079 pounds of monoterpenes) annually. Emissions vary based on species characteristics (e.g., some genera such as oaks are high isoprene emitters) and amount of leaf biomass. The highest volume of VOC emissions is generated by Quercus agrifolia (coast live oak), accounting for approximately 30.2% of the overall emissions, due to their size (7.0% of overall leaf area) and species attributes. Regardless, the net air quality benefit of Q. agrifolia is positive. Air quality impacts of trees are complex, and the i-Tree Eco software models these interactions to help urban forest managers evaluate the true impact of urban trees on Rohnert Park's air quality. The cumulative and interactive effects of trees on climate, pollution removal, VOCs, and power plant emissions determine the net impact of trees on air pollution. Local urban forest management decisions also can help improve air quality by prioritizing tree species recognized for their ability to improve air quality and planting next to large traffic corridors. 17 Resource Benefits Table 8: Annual Air Quality Benefits by Most Prevalent Species Sequoia sempervirens 5,222 32.58 1.91 24,677.31 58.44 4.73 Quercus agrifolia 1,127 7.03 0.18 2,261.48 5.36 2.01 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 6.31 0.22 2,791.76 6.61 2.76 Pistacia chinensis 947 5.91 0.02 216.66 0.51 0.23 Salix spp. 671 4.19 0.06 831.37 1.97 1.24 Quercus rubra 481 3.00 0.04 476.09 1.13 0.99 Pyrus calleryana 454 2.83 0.04 461.70 1.09 1.02 Acer rubrum 446 2.78 0.01 177.53 0.42 0.40 Ligustrum lucidum 354 2.21 0.04 573.96 1.36 1.62 Liriodendron tulipifera 350 2.18 0.01 187.39 0.44 0.54 Fraxinus angustifolia 319 1.99 0.05 649.63 1.54 2.04 Liquidambar styraciflua 295 1.84 0.04 498.38 1.18 1.69 Gleditsia triacanthos 242 1.51 0.03 401.79 0.95 1.66 Lagerstroemia indica 238 1.48 0.00 36.70 0.09 0.15 Prunus cerasifera 173 1.08 0.01 81.80 0.19 0.47 Platanus occidentalis 162 1.01 0.04 455.70 1.08 2.81 Quercus lobata 161 1.00 0.03 328.82 0.78 2.04 all other species 3,374 21.05 0.47 71118 17.86 275 Total 16,027 100% 3.28 $42,226 100% Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reductions As environmental awareness continues to increase, conversations around global warming and the effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are increasing. As energy from the sun (sunlight) strikes the Earth's surface it is reflected into space as infrared radiation (heat). GHGs absorb some of this infrared radiation and trap heat in the atmosphere, modifying the temperature of the Earth's surface. Many chemical compounds in the Earth's atmosphere act as GHGs, including carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor, and human -made (gases/aerosols). As GHGs increase, the amount of energy radiated back into space is reduced, and more heat is trapped in the atmosphere. An increase in the average temperature of the Earth may result in changes in weather, sea levels, and land -use patterns, commonly referred to as "climate change" (NASA, 2020). Because urban trees use carbon as a building component for wood and foliar growth, they can help offset carbon emissions and should be recognized as a part of a community's solution for meeting carbon offset goals identified in climate action plans and other environmental policies. i-Tree tools can be used to estimate the GHG and carbon sequestration benefits of tree planting projects (California Air Resource Board, 2020). Urban trees reduce atmospheric CO2 in two ways: • Directly, through growth and the sequestration of CO2 in wood, foliar biomass, and soil • Indirectly, by lowering the demand for heating and air conditioning, thereby reducing the emissions associated with electric power generation and natural gas consumption. Resource Benefits 18 To date, Rohnert Park's community trees are estimated to be storing 9,364 tons of carbon (CO2) in woody and foliar biomass valued at nearly $1.6 million. Annually, the community tree resource directly sequesters an additional 150.7 tons of carbon valued at $25,701 with an average value of $1.60 per tree (Table 9). Among prevalent species, Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood, $2.54/tree), Gleditsia triacanthos (honeylocust, $2.06/tree), and Pyrus calleryona (Callery pear, $1.49/tree) provide the greatest annual per -tree benefits to atmospheric carbon removal, sequestering more than 84.7 tons of carbon annually (Figure 8). These three species account for 56.2% of overall carbon benefit and 36.9% of the overall population. $3.00 $2.54 $2.50 $2.06 $2.00 $1.49 $1.45 $1.50 $1.34 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 Sequoia sempervirens Gleditsia triacanthos Pyrus calleryana Quercus lobata Platanus occidentalis Species Figure 8. Top 5 Species for Carbon Benefits Table 9: Annual Carbon Sequestration Benefits by Most Prevalent Species Sequoia sempervirens 5,222 32.58 77.83 13,273.90 51.65 2.54 Quercus agrifolia 1,127 7.03 7.42 1,265.66 4.92 1.12 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 6.31 7.14 1,218.31 4.74 1.21 Pistacia chinensis 947 5.91 2.84 484.35 1.88 0.51 Salix spp. 671 4.19 4.64 791.82 3.08 1.18 Quercus rubra 481 3.00 2.17 370.40 1.44 0.77 Pyrus calleryana 454 2.83 3.98 678.35 2.64 1.49 Acer rubrum 446 2.78 1.87 318.44 1.24 0.71 Ligustrum lucidum 354 2.21 2.39 407.95 1.59 1.15 Liriodendron tulipifera 350 2.18 1.08 183.76 0.72 0.53 Fraxinus angustifolia 319 1.99 2.16 367.54 1.43 1.15 Liquidambar styraciflua 295 1.84 1.92 326.89 1.27 1.11 Gleditsia triacanthos 242 1.51 2.93 499.30 1.94 2.06 Lagerstroemia indica 238 1.48 0.63 107.81 0.42 0.45 Prunus cerasifera 173 1.08 0.77 132.00 0.51 0.76 Platanus occidentalis 162 1.01 1.28 217.65 0.85 1.34 Quercus lobata 161 1.00 1.37 233.08 0.91 1.45 all other species 3,374 21.05 28.3 4,823.41 18.77 1.43 Total 16,027 100% 150.69 $25,701 100%.0 19 Resource Benefits Stormwater Runoff Reductions Rainfall interception by trees reduces the amount of stormwater that enters collection and treatment facilities during large storm events (Figure 9) Trees intercept rainfall in their canopy, acting as mini reservoirs, controlling runoff at the source. Healthy urban trees reduce the amount of runoff and pollutant loading in receiving waters in three primary ways: • Leaves and branch surfaces intercept and store rainfall, thereby reducing runoff volumes and delaying the onset of peak flows Root growth and decomposition increase the capacity and rate of soil infiltration by rainfall and reduce overland flow Transpiration • Tree canopies reduce soil erosion and surface flows by diminishing the impact of raindrops on bare soil Rohnert Park's community tree resource is estimated to contribute to the avoidance of more than 1 million gallons of stormwater runoff annually through the interception of precipitation on the leaves and bark of trees for an average of 64.0 gallons per tree (Table 9). The total value of this benefit is $9,127 annually, an average of $0.57 per tree. Precipitation Canopy Interception & Evaporation Imppervious Y Surface Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood) Evapotranspiration provides 58.4% of the estimated total avoided runoff and provides the most per tree benefit of $1.03 (Table 10, Figure 10). Their age Infiltration Runoff' distribution and stature allow them to provide a larger benefit in comparison to other species. In contrast, Lagerstroemia indica (crape myrtle), Roots Take Up 5oil Moisture, which represents 1.5% of the population, Increasing Runoff Storage Potential reduces around 0.1% of the estimated total avoided runoff. This small stature species is limited in Figure 9: Trees Reduce Stormwater Runoff its ability to intercept Stormwater because 91.6% of the population is less than 8 inches DBH. As this species is a small stature tree and does not grow much bigger and benefits are not likely to grow significantly. Characteristics that contribute to greater stormwater capture include large leaves, broad or dense canopies, and furrowed bark. As trees grow, the benefits that they provide tend to grow as well. Some species provide more benefits than others, based on their architecture and leaf morphology. Other trees have characteristics that hinder their ability to be strong contributors to stormwater runoff reduction, including trees with smaller leaves and thinner canopy (i.e. less leaf surface area). Resource Benefits 20 $1.20 $1.09 $1.02 $1.00 $0.90 w $0.80 $0.69 $0.60 $0.48 tw $0.40 v a $0.20 $0.00 Fraxinus Fraxinus velutina Morus alba Fraxinus holotricha Platanus x hybrida angustifolia Species Figure 10. Top 5 Species for Stormwater Benefits Table 70. Stormwater Benefits by Most Prevalent Tree Species Sequoia 5,222 300.01 36,653,593 2,867,972 16,415,922 2,885,398 599,847 5,360.23 sempervirens Quercus agrifolia 1,127 27.49 3,359,018 262,827 1,504,392 264,424 54,971 491.22 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 33.94 4,146,643 324,455 1,857,143 326,427 67,861 606.41 Pistacia chinensis 947 2.63 321,806 25,180 144,126 25,333 5,266 47.06 Salix spp. 671 10.11 1,234,848 96,621 553,047 97,208 20,209 180.58 Quercus rubra 481 5.79 707,141 55,330 316,705 55,667 11,573 103.41 Pyrus calleryana 454 5.61 685,777 53,659 307,137 53,985 11,223 100.29 Acer rubrum 446 2.16 263,684 20,632 118,095 20,757 4,315 38.56 Ligustrum lucidum 354 6.98 852,511 66,705 381,811 67,110 13,952 124.67 Liriodendron tulipifera 350 2.28 278,333 21,778 124,656 21,911 4,555 40.7 Fraxinus angustifolia 319 7.9 964,905 75,499 432,149 75,958 15,791 141.11 Liquidambar styraciflua 295 6.06 740,257 57,922 331,536 58,274 12,115 108.26 Gleditsia triacanthos 242 4.88 596,779 46,695 267,277 46,979 9,766 87.27 Lagerstroemia indica 238 0.45 54,508 4,265 24,412 4,291 892 7.97 Prunus cerasifera 173 0.99 121,503 9,507 54,417 9,565 1,988 17.77 Platanus occidentalis 162 5.54 676,858 52,961 303,142 53,283 11,077 98.98 Quercus lobata 161 4 488,403 38,215 218,739 38,447 7,993 71.42 all other species 3,374 86.50 10,571,783 827,193 4,734,749 832,219 173,011 1,546 4,907,418 28,089,45740 21 Resource Benefits Energy Savings Trees modify climate and conserve energy in three principal ways: • Shading reduces the amount of radiant energy absorbed and stored by hardscape surfaces, thereby reducing the heat island effect • Transpiration converts moisture to water vapor, thereby cooling the air by using solar energy that would otherwise result in heating of the air • Reduction of wind speed plus the movement of outside air into interior spaces, and conductive heat loss where thermal conductivity is relatively high (e.g., glass windows) (Simpson, 1998) The heat island effect describes the increase in urban temperatures in relation to surrounding suburban and rural areas. Heat islands are associated with an increase in hardscape and impervious surfaces. Trees and other vegetation within an urbanized environment help reduce the heat island effect by lowering air temperatures 5°F (3°C) compared with outside of the green space (Chandler, 1965). On a larger scale, temperature differences of more than 9°F (5°C) have been observed between city centers without adequate canopy coverage and more vegetated suburban areas (Akbari et al, 1997). The relative importance of these effects depends upon the size and configuration of trees and other landscape elements (McPherson, 1993). Tree spacing, crown spread, and vertical distribution of leaf area each influence the transport of warm air and pollutants along streets and out of urban canyons. Trees reduce conductive heat loss from buildings by reducing air movement into buildings and against conductive surfaces (e.g., glass, metal siding). Trees can reduce wind speed and the resulting air infiltration by up to 50%, translating into potential annual heating savings of 25% (Heisler, 1986). Electricity & Natural Gas Reductions Energy reduction metrics are calculated using data on tree distance and direction from buildings. The annual energy reductions from Rohnert Park's community trees were not calculated because this data is not currently captured in the inventory database. However, trees in Rohnert Park contribute to electric and natural gas savings through shading and climate buffering effects. Resource Benefits 22 Aesthetic, Property Value, & Socioeconomic Benefits Trees provide beauty in the urban landscape, privacy and screening, improved human health, a sense of comfort and place, and habitat for urban wildlife. Research shows that trees promote better business by stimulating more frequent and extended shopping and a willingness to pay more for goods and parking (Wolf, 2007). In residential areas, the values of these benefits are captured as a percentage of the value of the property on which a tree stands. There is no current model for calculating the aesthetic benefits of an urban forest. Although, there are many indicators that suggest trees and tree canopy cover contribute significantly to quality of life and community well-being. It is important to acknowledge that this assessment does not account for all the benefits provided by the tree resource. Some benefits are intangible and/or difficult to quantify, such as: • Impacts on psychological and physical health and wellness • Increases in tourism revenue • Quality of life • Wildlife habitat • Socio-economic impacts • Increases in property values Empirical evidence of these benefits does exist (Wolf, 2007; Kaplan and Kaplan, 1989; Ulrich, 1986), but there is limited knowledge about the physical processes at work and the complex nature of interactions make quantification imprecise. Tree growth and mortality rates are highly variable. A true and full accounting of benefits and investments must consider variability among sites (e.g., tree species, growing conditions, maintenance practices), as well as variability in tree growth. In other words, trees are worth far more than what one can ever quantify! Calculating Tree Benefits While all these tree benefits are provided by the community forest, it can be useful to understand the contribution of just one tree. Individuals can calculate the benefits of individual trees to their property by using i-Tree Design (design.itreetools.org). Annual Benefits of Most Prevalent Species It is important to keep in mind that a benefits analysis provides a snapshot of the community tree inventory as it exists today. The calculated benefits are based on the size and condition of existing trees. To provide greater context for the overall per tree and per species benefits of the most prevalent tree species (Figure 10, Table 11), and to determine if these benefits are a true indicator of performance, the age distribution and stature of the species must also be considered (Table 1, Figure 4). The most prevalent tree species in Rohnert Park's community tree resource, Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood, 32.6%), is providing the highest annual benefit, a value of $43,311. The high annual benefit is attributable to its prevalence in the population, mature age distribution, and stature (Figure 11). Sequoia sempervirens is providing the highest per tree benefit, an average of $8.29 per tree. The third most prevalent tree species in Rohnert Park's community tree resource, Platanus x hybrida (London planetree, 6.3%) is providing a value of $4,616, which is attributable to its large stature and 23 Resource Benefits age distribution (Figure 11). Among the prevalent species, Lagerstroemia indica (crape myrtle) provides the least amount in annual benefits ($152.48) and the lowest per tree benefit (average of $0.64 per tree). The majority of L. indica measure less than 8 inches in diameter. Many of these trees are likely mature and the annual per tree benefits are unlikely to increase significantly over time. Sequoia sempervirens Quercus agrifolia ■ 4,018.36 Platanus x hybrida ■ 4,616.48 Salix ' 1,803.77 Pyrus calleryona I 1,240.34 Gleditsia triacanthos I 988.36 Pistacia chinensis I 748.07 Ligustrum lucidum I 1,106.58 v Quercus rubra I 949.90 u v a L^ Fraxinus angustifolia ' 1,158.28 Liquidombor styrociflua I 933.53 Acer rubrum I 534.53 Quercus lobata I 633.32 Platanus occidentalis 1772.33 Liriodendron tulipifera I 411.85 Prunus cerasifera 1231.57 Lagerstroemia indica I 152.48 43,311.44 Carbon Sequestration ($/yr.) Avoided Runoff ($/yr.) ■ Pollution Removal ($/yr.) all other species 13,487 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 $/Species Figure 11: Summary of Annual Benefits for Most Prevalent Species 50,000 Resource Benefits 24 Table 17: Summary of Annual Benefits of Most Prevalent Species Sequoia sempervirens 5,222 32.58 77.83 13,274 599,847 5,360.23 1.91 24,677.31 43,311.44 Quercus agrifolia 1,127 7.03 7.42 1,266 54,971 491.22 0.18 2,261.48 4,018.36 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 6.31 7.14 1,218 67,861 606.41 0.22 2,791.76 4,616.48 Pistacia chinensis 947 5.91 2.84 484 5,266 47.06 0.02 216.66 748.07 Salix spp. 671 4.19 4.64 792 20,209 180.58 0.06 831.37 1,803.77 Quercus rubra 481 3.00 2.17 370 11,573 103.41 0.04 476.09 949.90 Pyrus calleryana 454 2.83 3.98 678 11,223 100.29 0.04 461.70 1,240.34 Acer rubrum 446 2.78 1.87 318 4,315 38.56 0.01 177.53 534.53 Ligustrum lucidum 354 2.21 2.39 408 13,952 124.67 0.04 573.96 1,106.58 Liriodendron 350 1.08 184 4,555 40.70 0.01 187.39 411.85 tulipifera 218 Froxinus angustifolia 319 1.99 2.16 368 15,791 141.11 0.05 649.63 1,158.28 Liquidambar 295 1.92 327 12,115 108.26 0.04 498.38 933.53 styraciflua 1.84 Gleditsio triocanthos 242 1.51 2.93 499 9,766 87.27 0.03 401.79 988.36 Lagerstroemia indica 238 1.48 0.63 108 892 7.97 0.00 36.70 152.48 Prunus cerasifera 173 1.08 0.77 132 1,988 17.77 0.01 81.80 231.57 Platanus occidentalis 162 1.01 1.28 218 11,077 98.98 0.04 455.70 772.33 Quercus lobato 161 1.00 1.37 233 7,993 71.42 0.03 328.82 633.32 all other species 3,374 21.05 28.30 4,823 173,011 1,545.97 0.47 7,117.56 13,487 Total 16,027 100% 150.69 $25,70140 0• 25 Resource Benefits Net Annual Benefits Rohnert Park receives substantial benefits from their community tree resource; however, managers should Carbon Sequestraion understand and evaluate the investment required to ($/yr ) preserve the community tree resource along with $25,701 the benefits that it provides. A limitation of the 33.3% annual benefits summary is that i-Tree Eco does not fully account for all benefits provided by community tree resource. Many of the Pollution documented environmental and socioeconomic Removal ($/yr.) benefits provided by trees are intangible and not $42,226 able to be quantified using current methods 54.8% (University of Washington, 2018; University of Illinois, 2018). Avoided Runoff ($/yr•) $9,172 11.9 % Rohnert Park's community tree resource has a Figure 12: Annual Environmental Benefits beneficial effect on the environment, and annually contributes $77,098 in quantifiable benefits to the community (Figure 12). Individual components of the environmental benefits include improved air quality $42,226 (54.8%), carbon reduction of $25,701 (33.3%), and stormwater management for $9,172 (11.9%). Annually, community trees provide a total benefit of $77,098, a value of $4.81 per tree and $1.88 per capita. Resource Benefits 26 Pest and Pathogen Threats Management of pests and disease organisms can be a challenge in any urban forest. In some cases, a pest or disease can result in significant tree damage or loss and/or be costly to manage. Involvement in the global economy, close proximity to major ports, and a highly mobile human population increase the risk of an invasive pest or pathogen introduction into Rohnert Park. To further investigate the risk of pests and pathogens, i-Tree Eco identifies the susceptibility of tree populations to 37 emerging and existing pests and pathogens in the United States (Appendix B). According to the analysis, 14,689 (91.7%) of Rohnert Park's community trees are susceptible to the included pests and pathogens and the potential risk is estimated at $58.3 million. The pests and pathogens identified as most relevant to Rohnert Park are included in Table 12. Anticipating and monitoring for these threats is an important part of urban forest management. According to the analysis, the pests of greatest concern for Rohnert Park's community forest are threats oak species (Quercus spp.) and include sudden oak death and the polyphagous shot hole borer. Sudden oak death (caused by the pathogen Phytophthora ramorum) is documented in Sonoma County (California Oak Mortality Taskforce, 2020). In susceptible hosts, the pathogen can become systemic and girdle trees as quickly as one year after infection (Daugherty and Hung, 2020). Of Rohnert Park's community trees, 65.9% are at risk to sudden oak death. The polyphagous shot hole borer (Euwallacea nov. sp.) is involved in a disease called Fusarium dieback. The beetles introduce fungi, some of which are tree pathogens that disrupt the flow of water and nutrients. The damage causes cankers, branch dieback, and over time can kill the tree (Eskalen, 2018). The polyphagous shot hole borer has been detected in southern California, but this pest may have the potential to spread northward because of its large host range (consisting of more than 260 plant species) and ability to colonize healthy or stressed trees. An estimated 27% of trees in Rohnert Park are hosts to polyphagous shot hole borer, a susceptible replacement value of over $13.3 million. The spotted lanternfly (Lycorma dedcatula) is an invasive insect first documented in Pennsylvania in 2014 with more recent infestations in neighboring states. Spotted lanternfly is considered a nuisance pest due to the astounding populations it can reach and the negative impacts it can have on landscape tree plantings and economically important crops. This species uses its piercing -sucking mouthparts to feed on plant sap which results in wilting, reduced vigor, and honeydew formation that can promote the growth of sooty mold, and/or fungal mats (Penn State Extension, n.d.). Spotted lanternfly is a generalist feeder, with over 70 documented hosts. Although not present in California, spotted lanternfly is a potential threat to many species such as maple (Acer), walnut (Juglans), birch (Betula), willow (Salix), and apple (Malus). The host range of spotted lanternfly narrows in the adult stage when tree of heaven (Ailanthus) and grape (Vitis) are the preferred reproductive hosts. Defoliating moths, such as the winter moth (Operophtera brumata), are not yet present in California, but they threaten a range of tree hosts present in Rohnert Park (9.9% trees susceptible). During outbreaks, the feeding damage weakens the tree host, and renders it more vulnerable to other pests and diseases (Collins, 1996). Winter moth has the potential to cause an estimated $5.1 million in damages to Rohnert Park's community trees. 27 Pest and Pathogen Threats Sudden Oak Death Polyphagous Shot Hole Borer Spotted Lanternfly Winter Moth Asian Longhorned Beetle Oak Wilt Browntail Moth Goldspotted Oak Borer Large Aspen Tortrix Aspen Leafminer Forest Tent Caterpillar Emerald Ash Borer Southern Pine Beetle Pine Shoot Beetle Sirex Wood Wasp Thousand Canker Disease Butternut Canker Laurel Wilt Armillaria Root Disease Mediterranean Oak Borer Heterobasidion Root Disease Dutch Elm Disease Jack Pine Budworm Red Pine Scale Western Spruce Budworm Beech Bark Disease Black Stain Root Disease Dogwood Anthracnose Mountain Pine Beetle Spruce Beetle Spruce Budworm White Pine Blister Rust Douglas -fir Black Stain Root Disease Northern Spruce Engraver Pine Black Stain Root Disease Western Bark Beetle Western Pine Beetle Table 12: Pest & Pathogen Threats to Rohnert Park Phytophthora ramorum Euwallacea nov. sp. Lycorma delicatula Operophtera brumata Anoplophora glabripennis Ceratocystis fagacearum Euproctis chrysorrhoea Agrilus auroguttatus Choristoneura conflictana Phyllocnistis populiella Malacosoma disstria Agrilus planipennis Dendroctonus frontalis Tomicus piniperda Sirex noctilio Geosmithia morbida Sirococcus clavigignenti juglandacearum Raffaelea lauricola Armillaria spp. Xyleborus monographus Heterobasidion irregular%ccidentale Ophiostoma novo-ulmi Choristoneura pinus Matsucoccus resinosae Choristoneura occidentalis Neon ectria faginata Leptographium wageneri Discula destructiva Dendroctonus ponderosae Dendroctonus rufipennis Choristoneura fumiferana Cronartium ribicola Leptographium wageneri var. pseudotsugae Ips perturbatus Leptographium wageneri var. ponderosum Dryocoetes confusus Dendroctonus brevicomis 7,053 43,832,198 65.90 75.18 6,789 13,340,821 27.00 22.88 3,624 6,572,301 13.60 11.27 2,831 5,109,080 9.90 8.76 2,689 5,163,232 10.70 8.86 1,964 4,102,174 8.10 7.04 1,184 1,646,759 3.10 2.82 1,147 2,671,959 5.40 4.58 861 1,299,717 2.60 2.23 768 1,175,734 2.30 2.02 680 1,036,501 2.00 1.78 579 1,295,862 2.90 2.22 119 682,632 0.70 1.17 117 681,634 0.70 1.17 117 681,634 0.70 1.17 107 226,260 0.40 0.39 86 195,621 0.40 0.34 57 132,970 0.30 0.23 55 307,288 0.50 0.53 30 45,713 0.10 0.08 25 52,363 0.10 0.09 23 29,074 0.10 0.05 5 9,929 0.00 0.02 5 7,378 0.00 0.01 4 6,253 0.00 0.01 2 2,056 0.00 0.00 2 2,584 0.00 0.00 2 82 0.00 0.00 2 5,255 0.00 0.01 2 997 0.00 0.00 2 997 0.00 0.00 2 4,240 0.00 0.01 1 2,543 0.00 0.00 1 41 0.00 0.00 1 2,543 0.00 0.00 1 2,543 0.00 0.00 1 2,543 0.00 0.00 Pest and Pathogen Threats 28 Pest Management Although managers cannot foresee when a pest or pathogen may be introduced to the urban forest, being aware of potential threats is the first step in a preparedness program. Following Integrated Pest Management (IPM) protocol and best management practices when preparing for and addressing pests and diseases can help to minimize their economic, health, and environmental consequences (Wiseman and Raupp, 2016). Some management practices include: • Obtain current information on emergent pests and pathogens • Increase understanding of the biology of the pest and pathogen as well as the tree symptoms that indicate infestation/infection • Identify procedures and protocols that will be followed in the case of an introduced pest or pathogen • Complete training and licensing in the case of pesticide or fungicide use • Plant tree species that are resistant or tolerant to identified pest and pathogen threats • Choose healthy, vigorous nursery stock • Diversify plantings at the genus level, as many pests threaten several species within a genus • Prevent the movement of felled tree materials that may be harboring pests or pathogens such as untreated logs, firewood, and woodchip 29 Pest and Pathogen Threats Resource Maintenance Needs Appropriate and timely tree care can substantially increase the lifespan of a tree. When trees live longer, they provide greater benefits. As individual trees mature and aging trees are replaced, the overall value of the tree resource and the amount of benefits provided grow as well. However, this vital living resource is vulnerable to a host of stressors and requires ecologically sound and sustainable best management practices to ensure a continued flow of benefits for future generations. During the inventory process, maintenance needs, tree defects, and inspection needs were recorded for all community trees (Tables 13, 14, and 15). All community trees were given some type of maintenance task to manage the resource more proactively and better predict future funding needs. Maintenance Needs Trees needing some form of maintenance had specific treatments recommended. Trees in good condition with minimal defects were assigned large or small tree routine prune. The most common pruning treatment was for routine prune (small tree and large tree 18.1 % and 70.7% of the population, respectively). Other pruning treatments were prescribed in lesser proportions and include 3.2% of the population in need of training pruning and 5.2% in need priority pruning (Table 13). Trees with structural defects require priority maintenance or removal. A total of 2.6% trees recommended for removal in the community tree resource. The significance of this workload is better understood by considering the size distribution of these trees. Smaller trees are typically less costly to remove and are also likely a lower risk to public safety. Table 73: Summary of Maintenance Tasks for Community Trees Large Tree Routine Prune 11,333 70.71 Small Tree Routine Prune 2,899 18.09 Priority 2 Pruning 667 4.16 Training Prune 507 3.16 Priority 2 Removal 192 1.20 Priority 1 Pruning 155 0.97 Priority 3 Removal 142 0.89 Priority 1 Removal 85 0.53 None 32 0.20 Palm Prune 15 0.09 31 Resource Maintenance Needs Primary Defects The community tree population has various defects affecting the tree and subsequent maintenance need. Significant defects were recorded on a total of 63.9% of trees. The most common defects are poor structure (22.2%), dead /dying branches (8.1%), and improper branch attachments (5.1%) (Table 14). Trees with structural defects require priority maintenance or removal. Those trees in good condition with minimal defects could be assigned large or small tree routine prune. All community trees should be given some type of maintenance task to ensure trees are receiving routine and proactive maintenance. Table 14: Summary of Primary Defects of Community Trees None 5,781 36.07 Poor Structure 3,551 22.16 Dead /Dying Branches 2,534 15.81 Branch Attachment 817 5.10 Signs of Stress 774 4.83 Lean 636 3.97 Trunk Condition 373 2.33 Broken Limbs/Hangers 300 1.87 Other - See Notes 258 1.61 Root Decay/Damage 233 1.45 Cavity/Decay/Cankers 195 1.22 Pruning History 130 0.81 Pest/Biotic Problem 92 0.57 Stem Girdling 89 0.56 Mechanical Damage 83 0.52 Previous failure 73 0.46 Over -extended Branches 31 0.19 Stake/Tie Issue 23 0.14 Collar buried/Not visible 18 0.11 Fungal Fruiting Bodies 18 0.11 Cracks 10 0.06 Root Plate Lifting 8 0.05 Resource Maintenance Needs 32 Clearence and Inspections As trees grow their canopies expand and can cover street signs or block the view of a crosswalk. In Rohnert Park, 86.4% of community trees did not require clearance maintenance. Vehicle Clearence was recommended for 9.3% of trees and Pedestrian Clearance was recommended for 2.6% of trees (Table 15). Along with clearance needs, trees may need further inspection to assess risk posed to the public or property. While most trees did not require further inspection (97.3%), a subset were recommended for Level 2 Risk Assessment, Annual Inspection, or Insect/Disease Monitoring (Table 16). Of the 322 trees that are recommended for Level 2 Inspection 174 are also recommended for removal. See Appendix B for risk assessment methodology (Tables 19 and 20). Inspections and risk assessments are crucial to maintenance programs to proactively manage trees before costly failures occur and should be conducted annually. Trees should be selected specifically for the space available with characteristics favorable to an urban environment. Table IS: Clearence Required None 13,842 86.37 Vehicle 1,479 9.23 Pedestrian 413 2.58 Pedestrian and Vehicle 167 1.04 Street Lights/Traffic Signals 81 0.51 Signs 45 0.28 .0 00, Table 16. Further Inspection Required None 15,597 Level 2 Risk Assessment 322 Annual Inspection 85 Insect/Disease Monitoring 23 97.32 2.01 0.53 0.14 33 Resource Maintenance Needs Tree Inventory Management Plan The City of Rohnert Park's tree inventory is a dynamic resource that requires continued investment to maintain and realize its full potential. Trees are one of the few community assets that have the potential to increase in value with time and proper management. Adequate protection and planning, and appropriate and timely tree care can substantially increase lifespan and benefit yield. When trees live longer, they provide greater benefits. As individual trees mature, and failing trees are replaced, the overall value of the community forest and benefits grow as well. However, this vital living resource is vulnerable to a host of stressors and ecologically sound and sustainable best management practices are required to ensure a healthy and safe community forest and a continued flow of benefits for future generations. Funding Rohnert Park's urban forestry staff provided estimated investment costs. Current funding levels are not adequate to support the necessary staffing and resources needed for all maintenance activities. The total annual cost of managing the community tree resource in Rohnert Park is approximately $93,928. Based on budget information from 2023 and 2024, in total, 25% of the costs are attributed to tree removal and to young tree care. In addition, 20% of the costs are attributed to annual pruning and to administration work. The remaining costs address maintenance and tree inspections (Table 18). Table 17. Quantifiable Benefits and Investments Pruning 18,786 1.17 0.46 Removals 23,482 1.47 0.57 Young Tree Care 23,482 1.47 0.57 Tree Inspections 4,696 0.29 0.11 Administration 18,786 1.17 0.46 Maintenance/Miscellaneous 4,696 0.29 0.11 Work Plan Work plans and planting plans provide a roadmap of annual maintenance needs for the community tree resource and the estimated funds necessary. They document the current inventory needs and do not account for changes in priority needs or community direction. Staff will continue to schedule work based on the highest priority. In other words, if a tree is recommended for a routine prune during the initial inventory collection, but a service request and/or further inspection indicates a heightened maintenance need, the priority will be reassessed. Rohnert Park's work plan is based on the maintenance needs identified in the 2024 tree inventory of 16,027 community trees. Rohnert Park's work plan schedules all priority maintenance for community trees over a 5-year maintenance cycle (Table 17). Priority maintenance should be addressed first including all priority work not completed in the first 5 years, once completed, routine maintenance should be addressed in future cycles. It is important to note that annual inspections should be completed on all trees to reassess defects and priority needs. 35 Tree Inventory Management Plan The work plan is divided as follows: All priority 1 pruning and large priority 1 removals are addressed in year 1. Years 2 through 4 address priority 1 pruning and small priority 1 removals. Year 5 addressed priority 2 pruning and priority 2 and 3 removals. Maintenance activities are defined as: • Priority pruning includes trees that have branch issues that could impact public safety. • Priority removal includes trees that have various defects, disease or are dying and need to be removed. • Training pruning includes pruning of young or medium -aged trees to improve tree and branch architecture. • Routine maintenance includes trees (14,232) recommended for large and small routine pruning as well as those recommended for "trim, poorly structured" and trees with no specific maintenance recommendation. • Tree removal and stump grinding includes all trees recommended for removal (419) and stump grinding (122). Summary of Work for Years 7 through 5 Year 1- Work Plan • Priority Pruning: 100 • Priority Tree Removal: 65 • Stump Grinding: 80 • Tree Replacement: 40 • Training Prune: 60 Year 2- Work Plan • Priority Pruning: 100 • Priority Tree Removal: 65 • Stump Grinding: 80 • Tree Replacement: 40 • Training Prune: 60 Year 3- Work Plan • Priority Pruning: 100 • Priority Tree Removal: 65 • Stump Grinding: 40 • Tree Replacement: 40 • Training Prune: 60 Year 4- Work Plan • Priority Pruning: 100 Tree Inventory Management Plan 36 • Priority Tree Removal: 65 • Stump Grinding: 40 • Tree Replacement: 40 • Training Prune: 60 Year 5- Work Plan • Priority Pruning: 100 • Priority Tree Removal: 65 • Stump Grinding: 40 • Tree Replacement: 40 • Training Prune: 60 Excess Priority Work • Priority Pruning: 182 • Priority Tree Removal: 92 • Stump Grinding: 261 • Tree Replacement: 341 • Training Prune: 207 For maintenance projections, annual increases in cost are based on the anticipation of new tree planting and growth in the existing inventory as well as inflation. Actual costs for tree maintenance and planting may vary from the provided estimates. Some reasons that costs may fluctuate include: • Unforeseen events (e.g., storm damage, pests, or pathogens) • Changes in tree condition and/or priority needs • Increases to service costs (an annual increase of 5% was estimated) • Modifications to maintenance or planting schedules • Some locations may require extra or more frequent maintenance (e.g., clearance and safety pruning along bus routes and areas of town that have higher pedestrian traffic such as parks and greenbelts, and unidentified cycle busters) • Other unforeseen circumstances 37 Tree Inventory Management Plan Table 18: 5-Year Work and Planting Plan Costs for Each Activity Priority Work Year 1 Priority Work Year 2 Priority Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 All Work Maintenance Activity Diameter Cost/tree #ofTrees Total Cost/tree #ofTrees Total Cost Cost/treeEstimated of • #ofTrees Total Cost 0-3talCost $ - 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ - 0 $ 0 $ 4-6 $ 0 $ $ 1 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 1 $ 7-12 $ 0 $ $ 10 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 10 $ 13 - 18 $ 0 $ $ 43 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 50 $ 93 $ Priority Pruning 19 - 24 $ 28 $ $ 1 $ $ 0 $ - $ 86 $ $ 50 $ 165 $ 25 - 32 $ 26 $ $ 0 $ $ 80 $ - $ 14 $ $ 0 $ 120 $ 33 - 36 $ 18 $ $ 13 $ $ 20 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 51 $ 37 - 42 $ 8 $ $ 23 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 31 $ 43 + $ 20 $ $ 9 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 29 $ 0-3 $0 24 $0 $0 60 $0 $0 60 $0 $0 60 $0 $0 60 $0 264 $0 Training Pruning 4-6 $0 35 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 35 $0 7-12 $0 1 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 1 $0 Activity Total(s) i i i i0 0-3 $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ 4-6 $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ 7-12 $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ 13-18 $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ Routine Pruning 19 - 24 $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ 25 - 32 $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ 33-36 $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ 37-42 $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ 43+ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ Activity Total(s) i i i 0-3 $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ 4-6 $ 2 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 14 $ 16 $ 7-12 $ 0 $ $ 19 $ $ 3 $ - $ 65 $ $ 25 $ 112 $ 13-18 $ 21 $ $ 1 $ $ 56 $ - $ 0 $ $ 14 $ 92 $ Priority Tree Removal 19 - 24 $ 22 $ $ 22 $ $ 6 $ - $ 0 $ $ 5 $ 55 $ 25 - 32 $ 14 $ $ 17 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 5 $ 36 $ 33 - 36 $ 3 $ $ 6 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 9 $ 37-42 $ 3 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ - $ 0 $ $ 1 $ 4 $ 43+ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 0 $ $ 1 $ 1 $ 0 -18 $ 10 $ $ 52 $ $ 21 $ - $ 0 $ $ 34 $ 55 $ Stump Grinding & Removal �18 - 36 $ 67 $ $ 28 $ $ 10 $ - $ 40 $ $ 6 $ 56 $ 36+ $ 3 $ $ 0 $ $ 9 $ - $ 0 $ $ 0 $ 9 $ Activity Total(s) :i :i i :0 Replacement Trees Xgal. $ 40 $ - $ - 40 $ - $ - 40 $ - $ - 40 $ - $ - 40 $ - 200 $ - Tree Inventory Management Plan 38 Planting Plan The city has a goal to increase canopy cover by 12%. To counter loss of canopy due to removals, tree death, and disease, the city will need to plant trees and monitor progress. There are 841 vacant sites, 419 removals, and 122 stumps in Rohnert Park. The goal should be to replace trees with the largest statured tree possible for each site. Based on the current replacement rate of 40 trees a year (Table 17), it would take over 34 years to reach 100% stocking rate. It's important to note that this number does not consider trees lost due to weather, disease, or natural life cycle. Tree Planting Strategies Documenting current canopy levels can serve as a benchmark for measuring progress toward targeted goals. A continued commitment to community tree planting will support the health and welfare of the city and the community at large. Based on this analysis DRG recommends: • Increase tree coverage by 12% by 2035. o Based on species and DBH data in the community tree resource, i-Tree Eco estimates the resource currently provides 513.4 acres of tree canopy. An additional 61.6 acres of new canopy could meet the goal. o Replace trees that are removed and plant trees in available planting sites to increase the stocking level, ideally 100%. • Increase genus and species diversity in new and replacement tree plantings to increase resiliency in the urban forest and reduce reliance on the most prevalent species. • Identify an overall goal for the representation of native trees in the inventory. o Plant native trees in priority areas, such as naturalized areas as defined by the General Plan 2040, to improve diversity, increase benefits, and further distribute the age distribution of inventoried trees. o Prioritize planting California native species to replace trees that have previously been removed or identified as dying where appropriate. • Use the largest stature tree possible where space allows to optimize urban forest benefits. • Consider successional planting of important species, as determined by relative performance index (RPI) and the relative age distribution. • Implement right tree, right place principles during tree selection and planting. • Identify planter size, soil type, and available water/irrigation to select the best space and species possible. • Prepare planting plans that help the city track the stocking level and species diversity of the community tree resource. • Promote tree planting on private property and provide education on maintenance to help preserve existing private canopy. • Consider alternative revenue sources like corporate sponsorships to fund tree planting. • Prioritize creating new planting spaces in areas with lower canopy cover. Tree Inventory Management Plan 40 Tree Maintenance Strategies Urban forest managers can better anticipate future trends with an understanding of the composition and structure of the tree population. Managers can also anticipate challenges and devise plans to optimize efficiency and anticipate budgetary needs. Performance data from this analysis can be used to make determinations regarding species selection, distribution, and maintenance policies. Maintenance needs can be used to plan a proactive and forward -looking approach to the care of community trees. Updates should continue to be incorporated into the inventory as regular maintenance is performed, including changes in the diameter and condition of existing trees. Current and complete inventory data will help staff to track maintenance activities and tree health more efficiently and will provide a strong basis for making informed management decisions. Based on maintenance needs and population structure from this analysis, DRG recommends the following management actions: • Schedule and assign high -priority tree work so it can be completed as soon as possible. • Prioritize large priority pruning and removals. o Priority 1 work is recommended to be completed in 12 months. o Priority 2 work is recommended to be completed in 24 months. o Priority 3 work is less urgent and should be completed after priority 1 and 2 work. • Adress highest priority work requests as they were received. • Schedule routine maintenance for all inventoried trees to proactively manage Rohnert Park's tree resource. o Complete training pruning for young trees in their 2nd and 5th year. o Follow industry standards to complete routine maintenance work in 5-7 years. • Regularly inspect trees to identify and mitigate structural and age -related defects to manage risk and reduce the likelihood of tree and branch failure. • Monitor species with the potential to become invasive (e.g., Schinus molle [California peppertree], Triadica sebifera [Chinese tallow], Eucalyptus globulus [blue gum eucalyptus]) and implement management strategies as needed. • Monitor species performance (e.g., health, structure, longevity, pests, and disease resistance) and increase resilience in the urban forest by planting species that perform well in local and regional conditions, including introducing new species that indicate promising traits. • Species that are adequately represented by established age distributions but lack recent plantings should be considered for more frequent care. • Inventory updates should be incorporated as regular maintenance is performed, including updating the diameter and condition of existing trees. • Follow integrated pest management and best management practices when monitoring for and dealing with pests and diseases. • Maintain and update the inventory database to include new tree plantings, removals, as well as changes in diameter and condition. • Consider adding information on distance and orientation to the nearest structure/building so that energy benefits can be calculated in future analyses. • Seek additional funding where possible to proactively manage the urban forest. 41 Tree Inventory Management Plan OP AW 4 � { V Appendix A: References Akbari, H., D. Kurn, et al. 1997. Peak power and cooling energy savings of shade trees. Energy and Buildings 25:139-148. British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land, and Air Protection. 2005. Residential wood burning emissions in British Columbia. British Columbia Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. 2010. https://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.ciov/home.html California Air Resource Board. 2020. Urban and Community Forestry program Quantification Methodology. Retrieved from: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic//cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/caIfire ucf finalq m 012820.pdfifor California Invasive Species Advisory Committee. 2010. The California Invasive Species List. CA: Invasive Species Council of California. <http://www.iscc.ca.gov/docs/CaIifornialnvasiveSpeciesList.pdf> Center for Urban Forest Research. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/topics/urban forestry[ Clark JR, Matheny NP, Cross G, Wake V. 1997. A model of urban forest sustainability. Journal of Arboriculture 23 (1): 17-30. Collins, J. 1996. European Gypsy Moth. University of Kentucky Entomology Fact Sheet-425. Lexington, KY. Retrieved from https://entomology.ca.uky.edu/ef425 Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. 2018. Guide for Plant Appraisal. 10th Edition. International Society of Arboriculture. Cullen S. 2002. Tree Appraisal: Can Depreciation Factors Be Rated Greater than 100%? Journal of Arboriculture 28(3):153-158. [EIA] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2015; Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon. www3.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/EPAactivities/social-cost-carbon.pdf EPA. 2015. Social Cost of Carbon. https://www.epa.ciov/sites/production/files/201612/documents/social cost of carbon fact sheet.pdf Eskalen, A. 2018. Identifying Polyphagous and Kuroshio Shot Hole Borer in California. https://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/12df/8590.pdf Georgia Forestry Commission. 2009. Biomass Energy Conversion for Electricity and Pellets Worksheet. Dry Branch, GA: Georgia Forestry Commission Heisler, G.M. 1986. Energy Savings with Trees. J Arbor 12 (5): 113-125. Kaplan R., and Kaplan S. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Layton, M. 2004. 2005 Electricity Environmental Performance Report: Electricity Generation and Air Emissions. California Energy Commission. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005_energypolicy/documents/2004-11-15_workshop/2004-11-15_03- A LAYTON.PDF 43 Appendix A: References McPherson E.G. 1993. Evaluating the Cost -Effectiveness of Shade Trees for Demand -Side Management. Electricity Journal 6(9):57-65. McPherson, E.G. and J. R. Simpson 1999. Carbon dioxide reduction through urban forestry: guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-171. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research station 237 p. http://wcufre.ucNewman.edu/products/cufr_43.pdf McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Xiao, Q. 1999. Tree Guidelines for San Joaquin Valley Communities. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Center for Urban Forest Research. McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Crowell, A.M.N.; Xiao, Q. 2010. Northern California coast community tree guide: benefits, costs, and strategic planting. PSW-GTR-228. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW- GTR-228. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA. McPherson, EG., Xiao, XI, Maco, S.E., Van Der Zanden, A., Simpson, J.R., Bell, N., Peper, P.J. 2002 Western Washington and Oregon Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs and Strategic Planting. Center for Urban Forest Research Pacific Southwest Research Station. Fs.fed.us/psw Muller, R.N., and C. Bornstein. 2010. Maintaining the diversity of California's municipal forests Journal of Arboriculture 36.1: 18. NASA, 2020. What is the greenhouse effect? Earth Science Communications Team at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the California Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/19/what-is-the-greenhouse-effect/ Nowak, D.J., and D.E. Crane. 2000. The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) Model: quantifying urban forest structure and functions. In: Hansen, M., and T. Burk (Eds.) Integrated Tools for Natural Resources Inventories in the 21st Century. Proc. Of the IUFRO Conference. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-212. North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN. Pp. 714-720. See also httP://www.ufore.org. Nowak, D.J.; Crane, D.E.; Dwyer, J.F. 2002a. Compensatory value of urban trees in the United States. Journal of Arboriculture. 28(4): 194 — 199. Nowak, D.J.; Crane, D.E.; Stevens, J.C.; Ibarra, M. 2002b. Brooklyn's Urban Forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE- 290. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 107 p. Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers guidelines. For more information, see Nowak, Richards, N.A. 1982/83. Diversity and Stability in a Street Tree Population. Urban ecology. 7:159-171. Simpson JR. 1998. Urban Forest Impacts on Regional Space Condition Energy Use: Sacramento County Case Study. Journal of Arboriculture 24(4): 201-214. Ulrich, R.S. 1986. Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44. University of Illinois. 2018. Landscape and Human Health Laboratory. Retrieved from: http://lhhl.illinois.edu/research.htm University of Washington. 2018. Green Cities: Good Health. Retrieved from: http://depts.washington.edu/hhwb/ Appendix A: References 44 Vargas, K.E.; McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Gardner, S.L.; Xiao, Q. 2007a. Interior West community tree guide: benefits, costs, and strategic planting. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-205. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 105 p. Watson, G. 2002. Comparing formula methods of tree appraisal. Journal of Arboriculture, 28(1):11-18. Wolf, K.L. 2007. The environmental Psychology of Trees. International Council of Shopping Centers Research Review. 14, 3:39-43. Worrall, J.J. 2007. Chestnut Blight. Forest and Shade Tree Pathology. http://www.forestpathology.org/dis chestnut.html 45 Appendix A: References Appendix B: Methods i-Tree Eco Model and Field Measurements All field data was collected during the leaf -on season to properly assess tree canopies. The i-Tree Eco model uses inventory data, local hourly air pollution, and meteorological data to quantify the urban forest and its structure and benefits (Nowak & Crane, 2000), including: • Urban forest structure (e.g., genus composition, tree health, leaf area, etc.). • Amount of pollution removed hourly by the urban forest, and its associated percent air quality improvement throughout a year. Pollution removal is calculated for ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide and particulate matter (<2.5 microns). • Total carbon stored and net carbon annually sequestered by the urban forest. • Structural value of the forest as a replacement cost. • Potential impact of infestations by pests or pathogen. Definitions and Calculations Avoided surface water runoff value is calculated based on rainfall interception by vegetation, specifically the difference between annual runoff with and without vegetation. Although tree leaves, branches, and bark may intercept precipitation and thus mitigate surface runoff, only the precipitation intercepted by leaves is accounted for in this analysis. The U.S. value of avoided runoff, $0.009/gallon, is based on the U.S. Forest Service's Community Tree Guide Series (McPherson et al, 1999-2010; Peper et al, 2009; 2010; Vargas et al, 2007a-2008). Carbon emissions were calculated based on the total City carbon emissions from the 2010 US per capita carbon emissions (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, 2010) This value was multiplied by the population of Rohnert Park (40,971) to estimate total City carbon emissions. Carbon sequestration is removal of carbon from the air by plants. Carbon storage and carbon sequestration values are calculated based on $171 per short ton (EPA, 2015; Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, 2015). Carbon storage is the amount of carbon bound up in the above -ground and below -ground parts of woody vegetation. Carbon storage and carbon sequestration values are calculated based on $171 per ton (EPA, 2015; Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, 2015). Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) is the diameter of the tree measured 4'5" above grade. Household emissions average is based on average electricity kWh usage, natural gas Btu usage, fuel oil Btu usage, kerosene Btu usage, LPG Btu usage, and wood Btu usage per household in 2009 (EIA, 2013; EIA, 2014), CO2, SO2, and NO3 power plant emission per KwH (Leonardo Academy, 2011), CO emission per kWh assumes 1/3 of one percent of C emissions is CO (EIA, 2014), PM10 emission per kWh (Layton 2004), CO2, NO3, SO2, and CO emission per Btu for natural gas, propane and butane (average used to represent LPG), Fuel #4 and #6 (average used to represent fuel oil and kerosene) (Leonardo Academy, 2011), CO2 emissions per Btu of wood (EIA, 2014), CO, NO3 and SO2 emission per Btu based on total emissions and wood burning (tons) from (British Columbia Ministry, 2005; Georgia Forestry Commission, 2009). Leaf area was estimated using measurements of crown dimensions and percentage of crown canopy missing. 47 Appendix B: Methods Monetary values ($) are reported in US dollars throughout the report Ozone (03) is an air pollutant that is harmful to human health. Ozone forms when nitrogen oxide from fuel combustion and volatile organic gases from evaporated petroleum products react in the presence of sunshine. In the absence of cooling effects provided by trees, higher temperatures contribute to ozone (03) formation. Pollution removal is calculated based on the prices of $1,488 per ton (carbon monoxide), $9,780 per ton (ozone), $939 per ton (nitrogen dioxide), $358 per ton (sulfur dioxide), $353,713 per ton (particulate matter less than 2.5 microns), and $6,996 per ton (particulate matter less than 10 microns) (Nowak et al., 2014). Potential pest impacts were estimated based on tree inventory information from the study area combined with i-Tree Eco pest range maps. The input data included species, DBH, total height, height to crown base, crown width, percent canopy missing, and crown dieback. In the model, potential pest risk is based on pest range maps and the known pest host species that are likely to experience mortality. Pest range maps for 2012 from the Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) (Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, 2014) were used to determine the proximity of each pest to Sonoma County For the county, it was established whether the insect/disease occurs within the county, is within 250 miles of the county edge, is between 250 and 750 miles away, or is greater than 750 miles away. FHTET did not have pest range maps for Dutch elm disease and chestnut blight. The range of these pests was based on known occurrence and the host range, respectively (Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center; Worrall 2007). Due to the dates of some of these resources, pests may have encroached closer to the tree resource in recent years. Replacement value is based on the physical resource itself (e.g., the cost of having to replace a tree with a similar tree). Structural values were based on valuation procedures of the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers, which uses tree species, diameter, condition, and location information (Nowak et al 2002a; 2002b). Ton is equivalent to a U.S. short ton, or 2,000 pounds. Risk Assessment DRG evaluates risk and assigns a risk rating based on an assessment of the failure mode (i.e., branch, whole tree, codominant stem) with the most significant risk. The specified period for the risk assessment is one year. The risk part of this inventory and evaluation is to maintain compliance with the most recent standards and practices in the arboricultural industry. It is important to note that our inspections are "rapid assessments" and are meant to show a need for further study, and thus are not legally binding in any litigation. a. Likelihood of Failure. Identifies the most probable failure and rates the likelihood that structural defect(s) will result in failure based on observed current conditions. b. Likelihood of Impacting a Target. The rate of occupancy of targets within the target zone and any factors that could affect the failed tree as it falls towards the target. c. Consequences of Failure. The consequences of tree failure are based on the level of target and potential harm that may occur. Consequences can vary depending on the size of the defect, the distance of fall for the tree or limb, and any other factors that may protect a target from harm. Target values are subjective, but DRG staff try to assess them from our client's perspective. Appendix B: Methods 48 Occupancy Rates Constant: A target is present at nearly all times, 24 hrs/day, 7 days a week Frequent: The target zone is occupied for a large portion of a day or week. Occasional: The target zone is occupied by people or targets infrequently or irregularly. Rare: The target zone is not commonly used by people. Table 19: Likelihood of Failure Matrix LIKELIHOOD MATRIX Imminent Unlikely Somewhat Likely Very likely likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely DRG's urban foresters estimate the risk rating by combining the likelihood of tree failure impacting a target and the consequences of failure as seen in the matrices shown to the left. Risk ratings are Low, Moderate, High, and Extreme. A Low -Risk tree poses a low overall level of risk. A Moderate -Risk tree may pose some threat, particularly during storm events or unusual weather. A High -Risk tree presents a high likelihood of tree or tree part failure, even during normal weather conditions. An Extreme Risk tree always poses a significant risk and probability of failure. Table 20: Risk Rating Matrix RISK RATING MATRIX Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low Low Low 49 Appendix B: Methods Appendix C: Tables Table 21: Botanical and Common Names Sequoia sempervirens Coast redwood 5,222 32.58 Quercus agrifolia Coastal live oak 1,127 7.03 Platanus x hybrida London planetree 1,011 6.31 Pistacia chinensis Chinese pistache 947 5.91 Salix spp. Willow spp 671 4.19 Quercus rubra Northern red oak 481 3.00 Pyrus calleryana Callery pear 454 2.83 Acer rubrum Red maple 446 2.78 Ligustrum lucidum Glossy privet 354 2.21 Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip tree 350 2.18 Fraxinus angustifolia Narrow -leafed ash 319 1.99 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweetgu m 295 1.84 Gleditsia triacanthos Honeylocust 242 1.51 Lagerstroemia indica Common crapemyrtle 238 1.48 Prunus cerasifera Cherry plum 173 1.08 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore 162 1.01 Quercus lobata California white oak 161 1.00 Magnolia grandiflora Southern magnolia 143 0.89 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 132 0.82 Acersaccharinum Silver maple 125 0.78 Fraxinus americana White ash 118 0.74 Ginkgo biloba Ginkgo 110 0.69 Styphnolobium japonicum Pagoda tree 103 0.64 Juglans nigra Black walnut 86 0.54 Alnus rhombifolia White alder 85 0.53 Rhamnus alaternus Italian Buckthorn 83 0.52 Robinia pseudoacacia Black locust 80 0.50 Pinus radiata Monterey pine 77 0.48 Quercus ilex Holly oak 76 0.47 Sequoiadendron giganteum Giant sequoia 75 0.47 Eucalyptus nicholii Willow -leaved gimlet 71 0.44 Salixspp. babylonica Babylon weeping willow 59 0.37 Acer buergerianum Trident maple 57 0.36 Salix spp. lasiolepis Arroyo willow 54 0.34 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Sliver dollar eucalyptus 51 0.32 Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar 49 0.31 Celtis sinensis Chinese hackberry 49 0.31 Cupressus sempervirens Italian cypress 48 0.30 Fraxinus latifolia Oregon ash 47 0.29 Cercis canadensis Eastern redbud 46 0.29 Cinnamomum camphora Camphor tree 46 0.29 Appendix C: Tables 50 Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red gum eucalyptus 45 0.28 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 44 0.27 Juniperus chinensis Chinese juniper 43 0.27 Quercus suber Cork oak 43 0.27 Cedrus deodara Deodar cedar 42 0.26 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash 37 0.23 Malus sylvestris European crabapple 37 0.23 Salixspp. laevigata Red willow 37 0.23 Acer palmatum Japanese maple 36 0.22 Acer platanoides Norway maple 36 0.22 Searsia lancea African sumac 35 0.22 Ceratonia siliqua Carob 34 0.21 Prunus domestica Common plum 32 0.20 Acer negundo Boxelder 30 0.19 Populus nigra Black poplar 30 0.19 Cupressus macrocarpa Monterey cypress 29 0.18 Prunus serrulata Japanese flowering cherry 29 0.18 Cyclobalanopsis Evergreen Oak spp 28 0.17 Ma/us Apple spp 28 0.17 Platanus racemosa California sycamore 27 0.17 Quercus garryana Oregon white oak 26 0.16 Celtis australis European hackberry 24 0.15 Dodonaea viscosa Florida hopbush 24 0.15 Magnoliopsida Hardwood 22 0.14 Aesculus californica California buckeye 21 0.13 Koelreuteria paniculata Goldenrain tree 21 0.13 Ulmus pumila Siberian elm 21 0.13 Ligustrum japonicum Japanese privet 20 0.12 Quercus chrysolepis Canyon live oak 20 0.12 Ulmus parvifolia Chinese elm 20 0.12 Cercis canadensis v. texensis Western redbud 19 0.12 Juglans hindsii Hind walnut 19 0.12 Populus fremontii Fremont cottonwood 18 0.11 Populus nigra v. italica Lombardy poplar 18 0.11 Photinia serrulata Photinia 17 0.11 Acer tataricum Tatar maple 16 0.10 Maytenus boaria Mayten 15 0.09 Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood 14 0.09 Pinus pinea Italian stone pine 14 0.09 Populus alba White poplar 14 0.09 Eucalyptus sideroxylon Mugga ironbark 13 0.08 Juniperus virginiana Eastern red cedar 13 0.08 Photinia x fraseri Fraser photinia 13 0.08 Quercus imbricaria Shingle oak 13 0.08 51 Appendix C: Tables Juglans regia English walnut 12 0.07 Cotoneaster Cotoneaster spp 11 0.07 Fraxinus velutina Velvet ash 11 0.07 Oleo europaea Olive 11 0.07 Rhaphiolepis indica Indian hawthorn 11 0.07 Umbellularia californica California laurel 11 0.07 Acerxfreemanii Freeman maple 10 0.06 Carpinus betulus European hornbeam 10 0.06 Eriobotrya japonica Loquat tree 10 0.06 Cedrus atlantica Atlas cedar 9 0.06 Pinus halepensis Aleppo pine 9 0.06 Chamaecyparis False Cypress spp 8 0.05 Morus alba Tanoak 8 0.05 Notholithocarpus densiflorus White mulberry 8 0.05 Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf maple 7 0.04 Casuarina equisetifolia Australian pine 7 0.04 Hamamelis virginiana Witch hazel 7 0.04 Triadica sebifera Chinese tallowtree 7 0.04 Amelanchier Serviceberry spp 6 0.04 Crataegus phaenopyrum Washington hawthorn 6 0.04 Juniperus communis Common juniper 6 0.04 Phoenix canariensis Canary island date palm 6 0.04 Prunus avium Sweet cherry 6 0.04 Prunus ilicifolia Hollyleaf cherry 6 0.04 Quercus robur English oak 6 0.04 Thuja plicata Western red cedar 6 0.04 Acersaccharum Sugar maple 5 0.03 Alnus cordata Italian alder 5 0.03 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 5 0.03 Pyracantha Firethorn spp 5 0.03 Schinus molle California peppertree 5 0.03 Aesculus x cornea Red horsechestnut 4 0.02 Albizia julibrissin Persian silk tree 4 0.02 Eucalyptus calophylla Redgum 4 0.02 Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum eucalyptus 4 0.02 Nyssa sylvatica Black tupelo 4 0.02 Pinus thunbergii Japanese black pine 4 0.02 Prunus Plum spp 4 0.02 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 4 0.02 Xanthocyporis nootkatensis Nootka cypress 4 0.02 Acca sellowiana Feijoa 3 0.02 Betula pendula European white birch 3 0.02 Cussonia spicata Cabbage Tree 3 0.02 Fraxinus excelsior European ash 3 0.02 Appendix C: Tables 52 Grevillea robusta Silk oak 3 0.02 Laurus nobilis Bay laurel 3 0.02 Malus sieboldii ssp. sieboldii Japanese flowering crabapple 3 0.02 Quercus palustris Pin oak 3 0.02 Quercus wislizeni Interior live oak 3 0.02 Syagrus romanzoffiana Queen palm 3 0.02 Vitex agnus-castus Chaste tree 3 0.02 Callistemon citrinus Crimson bottlebrush 2 0.01 Celtis laevigata Sugarberry 2 0.01 Cornus kousa Smoke tree 2 0.01 Cotinus coggygria Kousa dogwood 2 0.01 Crataegus Hawthorn spp 2 0.01 Eucalyptus leucoxylon White ironbark 2 0.01 Fagus sylvatica European beech 2 0.01 Ficus carica Common fig 2 0.01 Juglans californica Southern California walnut 2 0.01 Pinus patula Mexican weeping pine 2 0.01 Pinus strobus Eastern white pine 2 0.01 Prunus salicina Chinese plum 2 0.01 Quercus virginiana Live oak 2 0.01 Salixspp. babylonica v. matsudana Common elderberry 2 0.01 Sambucus canadensis Corkscrew willow 2 0.01 Ulmus americana American elm 2 0.01 Ailanthus altissima Tree of heaven 1 0.01 Arbutus menziesii Pacific madrone 1 0.01 Bixa Bixa spp 1 0.01 Callistemon viminalis Weeping bottlebrush 1 0.01 Celtis occidentalis Northern hackberry 1 0.01 Cryptomeria japonica Japanese red cedar 1 0.01 Eucalyptus rudis Desert gum eucalyptus 1 0.01 Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 1 0.01 Morello californica Pacific bayberry 1 0.01 Parrotia persica Persian ironwood 1 0.01 Picea glauca Jack pine 1 0.01 Picea pungens White spruce 1 0.01 Pinus banksiana Ponderosa pine 1 0.01 Pinus ponderosa Blue spruce 1 0.01 Pinus resinosa Red pine 1 0.01 Pinus sylvestris Scots pine 1 0.01 Populus deltoides Eastern cottonwood 1 0.01 Prunus armeniaca Apricot 1 0.01 Prunus dulcis Sweet almond 1 0.01 Prunus persica Peach 1 0.01 Quercus acutissima Sawtooth oak 1 0.01 53 Appendix C: Tables Quercus coccinea Scarlet oak 1 0.01 Quercus velutina Black oak 1 0.01 Schinus terebinthifolia Brazilian peppertree 1 0.01 Trachycarpus fortunei Windmill palm 1 0.01 Tristanioosis laurina Water gum 1 0.01 Table 22: Importance Value (IV) for All Tree Species Sequoia sempervirens 5,222 32.58 58.44 91.02 Quercus agrifolia 1,127 7.03 5.36 12.39 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 6.31 6.61 12.92 Pistacia chinensis 947 5.91 0.51 6.42 Salix spp. 671 4.19 1.97 6.16 Quercus rubra 481 3.00 1.13 4.13 Pyrus calleryana 454 2.83 1.09 3.93 Acer rubrum 446 2.78 0.42 3.20 Ligustrum lucidum 354 2.21 1.36 3.57 Liriodendron tulipifera 350 2.18 0.44 2.63 Fraxinus angustifolia 319 1.99 1.54 3.53 Liquidambar styraciflua 295 1.84 1.18 3.02 Gleditsia triacanthos 242 1.51 0.95 2.46 Lagerstroemia indica 238 1.48 0.09 1.57 Prunus cerasifera 173 1.08 0.19 1.27 Platanus occidentalis 162 1.01 1.08 2.09 Quercus lobata 161 1.00 0.78 1.78 Magnolia grandiflora 143 0.89 0.39 1.28 Arbutus unedo 132 0.82 0.20 1.03 Acer saccharinum 125 0.78 0.67 1.45 Fraxinus americana 118 0.74 0.55 1.29 Ginkgo biloba 110 0.69 0.12 0.80 Styphnolobium japonicum 103 0.64 0.28 0.92 Juglans nigra 86 0.54 0.37 0.91 Alnus rhombifolia 85 0.53 0.21 0.74 Rhamnus alaternus 83 0.52 0.02 0.54 Robinia pseudoacacia 80 0.50 0.17 0.67 Pinus radiata 77 0.48 0.43 0.91 Quercus ilex 76 0.47 0.43 0.90 Sequoiadendron giganteum 75 0.47 0.67 1.13 Eucalyptus nicholii 71 0.44 2.70 3.14 Salix spp. babylonica 59 0.37 0.53 0.90 Acer buergerianum 57 0.36 0.05 0.41 Salix spp. lasiolepis 54 0.34 0.16 0.49 Appendix C: Tables 54 Eucalyptus polyanthemos 51 0.32 1.40 1.72 Calocedrus decurrens 49 0.31 0.49 0.80 Celtis sinensis 49 0.31 0.15 0.45 Cupressus sempervirens 48 0.30 0.08 0.38 Fraxinus latifolia 47 0.29 0.14 0.44 Cercis canadensis 46 0.29 0.02 0.30 Cinnamomum camphora 46 0.29 0.22 0.51 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 45 0.28 1.27 1.55 Fraxinus uhdei 44 0.27 0.41 0.68 Juniperus chinensis 43 0.27 0.15 0.42 Quercus suber 43 0.27 0.29 0.56 Cedrus deodara 42 0.26 0.16 0.43 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 37 0.23 0.25 0.48 Malus sylvestris 37 0.23 0.02 0.25 Salix spp. laevigata 37 0.23 0.17 0.40 Acer palmatum 36 0.22 0.03 0.26 Acer platanoides 36 0.22 0.02 0.24 Searsia lancea 35 0.22 0.05 0.27 Ceratonia siliqua 34 0.21 0.09 0.30 Prunus domestica 32 0.20 0.02 0.22 Acer negundo 30 0.19 0.06 0.24 Populus nigra 30 0.19 0.09 0.28 Cupressus macrocarpa 29 0.18 0.15 0.33 Prunus serrulata 29 0.18 0.01 0.19 Cyclobalanopsis 28 0.17 0.03 0.20 Ma/us 28 0.17 0.02 0.20 Platanus racemosa 27 0.17 0.31 0.48 Quercus garryana 26 0.16 0.04 0.20 Celtis Australis 24 0.15 0.03 0.18 Dodonaea viscosa 24 0.15 0.03 0.18 Magnoliopsida 22 0.14 0.00 0.14 Aesculus californica 21 0.13 0.10 0.24 Koelreuteria paniculata 21 0.13 0.05 0.18 Ulmus pumila 21 0.13 0.06 0.19 Ligustrum japonicum 20 0.12 0.02 0.14 Quercus chrysolepis 20 0.12 0.03 0.15 Ulmus parvifolia 20 0.12 0.03 0.15 Cercis canadensis v. texensis 19 0.12 0.01 0.13 Juglans hindsii 19 0.12 0.07 0.19 Populus fremontii 18 0.11 0.05 0.17 Populus nigra v. italica 18 0.11 0.12 0.24 Photinia serrulata 17 0.11 0.02 0.12 Acer tataricum 16 0.10 0.02 0.12 Maytenus boaria 15 0.09 0.05 0.14 Acacia melanoxylon 14 0.09 0.12 0.21 55 Appendix C: Tables Pinus pinea 14 0.09 0.16 0.24 Populus alba 14 0.09 0.17 0.26 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 13 0.08 0.44 0.53 Juniperus virginiana 13 0.08 0.03 0.12 Photinia x fraseri 13 0.08 0.02 0.10 Quercus imbricaria 13 0.08 0.01 0.09 Juglans regia 12 0.07 0.09 0.16 Cotoneaster 11 0.07 0.00 0.07 Fraxinus velutina 11 0.07 0.04 0.11 Oleo europaea 11 0.07 0.02 0.09 Rhaphiolepis indica 11 0.07 0.04 0.11 Umbellularia californica 11 0.07 0.03 0.10 Acer x freemanii 10 0.06 0.01 0.07 Carpinus betulus 10 0.06 0.03 0.09 Eriobotrya japonica 10 0.06 0.01 0.07 Cedrus atlantica 9 0.06 0.03 0.08 Pinus halepensis 9 0.06 0.05 0.11 Chamaecyparis 8 0.05 0.01 0.06 Morus alba 8 0.05 0.02 0.07 Notholithocarpus densiflorus 8 0.05 0.03 0.08 Acer macrophyllum 7 0.04 0.01 0.05 Casuarina equisetifolia 7 0.04 0.03 0.07 Hamamelis virginiana 7 0.04 0.03 0.07 Triadica sebifera 7 0.04 0.02 0.06 Amelanchier 6 0.04 0.01 0.04 Crataegus phaenopyrum 6 0.04 0.00 0.04 Juniperus communis 6 0.04 0.01 0.04 Phoenix canariensis 6 0.04 0.02 0.06 Prunus avium 6 0.04 0.01 0.04 Prunus ilicifolia 6 0.04 0.00 0.04 Quercus robur 6 0.04 0.03 0.07 Thuja plicata 6 0.04 0.02 0.06 Acer saccharum 5 0.03 0.00 0.04 Alnus cordata 5 0.03 0.03 0.06 Pinus canariensis 5 0.03 0.05 0.08 Pyracantha 5 0.03 0.00 0.04 Schinus molle 5 0.03 0.02 0.05 Aesculus x cornea 4 0.02 0.00 0.03 Albizia julibrissin 4 0.02 0.02 0.04 Eucalyptus calophylla 4 0.02 0.00 0.03 Eucalyptus globulus 4 0.02 0.12 0.14 Nyssa sylvatica 4 0.02 0.01 0.04 Pinus thunbergii 4 0.02 0.01 0.03 Prunus 4 0.02 0.00 0.03 Washingtonia robusta 4 0.02 0.01 0.04 Appendix C: Tables 56 Xanthocyparis nootkatensis 4 0.02 0.03 0.05 Acca sellowiana 3 0.02 0.00 0.02 Betula pendula 3 0.02 0.01 0.03 Cussonia spicata 3 0.02 0.00 0.02 Fraxinus excelsior 3 0.02 0.01 0.03 Grevillea robusta 3 0.02 0.01 0.03 Laurus nobilis 3 0.02 0.02 0.03 Malus sieboldii ssp. sieboldii 3 0.02 0.00 0.02 Quercus palustris 3 0.02 0.00 0.02 Quercus wislizeni 3 0.02 0.01 0.03 Syagrus romanzoffiana 3 0.02 0.00 0.02 Vitex agnus-castus 3 0.02 0.00 0.02 Callistemon citrinus 2 0.01 0.00 0.02 Celtis laevigata 2 0.01 0.02 0.03 Cornus kousa 2 0.01 0.00 0.01 Cotinus coggygria 2 0.01 0.00 0.01 Crataegus 2 0.01 0.00 0.01 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2 0.01 0.02 0.03 Fagus sylvatica 2 0.01 0.01 0.02 Ficus carica 2 0.01 0.00 0.01 Juglans californica 2 0.01 0.00 0.01 Pinus patula 2 0.01 0.01 0.02 Pinus strobus 2 0.01 0.01 0.02 Prunus salicina 2 0.01 0.00 0.01 Quercus virginiana 2 0.01 0.00 0.01 Salix spp. babylonica v. 2 0.01 0.01 0.02 matsudana Sambucus canadensis 2 0.01 0.00 0.01 Ulmus americana 2 0.01 0.01 0.02 Ailanthus altissima 1 0.01 0.01 0.02 Arbutus menziesii 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Bixa 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Callistemon viminalis 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Celtis occidentalis 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Cryptomeria japonica 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Eucalyptus rudis 1 0.01 0.03 0.04 Heteromeles arbutifolia 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Morello californica 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Parrotia persica 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Picea glauca 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Picea pungens 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Pinus banksiana 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Pinus ponderosa 1 0.01 0.01 0.01 Pinus resinosa 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Pinus sylvestris 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 57 Appendix C: Tables Populus deltoides 1 0.01 0.01 0.02 Prunus armeniaca 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Prunus dulcis 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Prunus persica 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Quercus acutissima 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Quercus coccinea 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Quercus velutina 1 0.01 0.01 0.01 Schinus terebinthifolia 1 0.01 0.01 0.02 Trachycarpus fortunei 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Tristaniopsis laurina 1 0.01 0.00 0.01 Table 23: Condition and RPI for All Tree Species Sequoia sempervirens 5,222 32.58 0.10 64.60 29.90 2.90 0.80 1.80 1.03 Quercus agrifolia 1,127 7.03 0.30 53.30 44.00 2.40 0.00 0.00 1.02 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 6.31 1.80 62.70 33.00 2.20 0.10 0.20 1.05 Pistacia chinensis 947 5.91 0.00 67.80 31.00 0.80 0.20 0.10 1.06 Salix spp. 671 4.19 0.00 9.50 70.60 17.30 0.70 1.80 0.87 Quercus rubra 481 3.00 0.40 54.10 40.70 3.10 0.60 1.00 1.01 Pyrus calleryana 454 2.83 0.00 21.60 73.80 4.20 0.20 0.20 0.94 Acer rubrum 446 2.78 0.00 63.50 33.90 1.80 0.40 0.40 1.04 Ligustrum lucidum 354 2.21 0.00 31.60 59.30 6.20 1.70 1.10 0.95 Liriodendron tulipifera 350 2.18 0.00 56.90 38.60 2.00 0.60 2.00 1.02 Fraxinus angustifolia 319 1.99 0.00 6.90 76.50 14.70 0.90 0.90 0.88 Liquidambar styraciflua 295 1.84 0.00 40.30 54.20 4.70 0.70 0.00 0.98 Gleditsia triacanthos 242 1.51 0.00 71.90 19.80 7.90 0.00 0.40 1.05 Lagerstroemia indica 238 1.48 0.40 54.20 39.50 2.50 1.70 1.70 1.01 Prunus cerasifera 173 1.08 0.00 24.90 63.60 10.40 0.60 0.60 0.93 Platanus occidentalis 162 1.01 0.00 24.10 75.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 Quercus lobata 161 1.00 0.60 60.90 33.50 4.30 0.00 0.60 1.03 Magnolia grandiflora 143 0.89 0.00 43.40 52.40 2.10 1.40 0.70 0.99 Arbutus unedo 132 0.82 2.30 65.90 27.30 2.30 1.50 0.80 1.05 Acer saccharinum 125 0.78 0.00 20.00 58.40 20.00 1.60 0.00 0.90 Fraxinus americana 118 0.74 0.00 25.40 69.50 5.10 0.00 0.00 0.95 Ginkgo biloba 110 0.69 0.00 81.80 18.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.09 Styphnolobium japonicum 103 0.64 0.00 15.50 64.10 19.40 0.00 1.00 0.89 Juglans nigra 86 0.54 0.00 15.10 61.60 17.40 2.30 3.50 0.87 Alnus rhombifolia 85 0.53 0.00 12.90 55.30 12.90 3.50 15.30 0.79 Rhamnus alaternus 83 0.52 0.00 2.40 79.50 10.80 1.20 6.00 0.84 Robinia pseudoacacia 80 0.50 0.00 23.80 51.30 23.80 0.00 1.30 0.90 Pinus radiata 77 0.48 0.00 20.80 58.40 10.40 1.30 9.10 0.86 Quercus ilex 76 0.47 0.00 77.60 19.70 2.60 0.00 0.00 1.08 Appendix C: Tables 58 Sequoiadendron giganteum 75 0.47 0.00 26.70 53.30 16.00 0.00 4.00 0.90 Eucalyptus nicholii 71 0.44 0.00 39.40 59.20 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.99 Salix spp. babylonica 59 0.37 0.00 1.70 91.50 3.40 1.70 1.70 0.88 Acer buergerianum 57 0.36 0.00 36.80 59.60 1.80 0.00 1.80 0.97 Salix spp. lasiolepis 54 0.34 0.00 29.60 57.40 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 Eucalyptus polyanthemos 51 0.32 0.00 13.70 80.40 5.90 0.00 0.00 0.93 Calocedrus decurrens 49 0.31 0.00 44.90 40.80 12.20 2.00 0.00 0.97 Celtis sinensis 49 0.31 0.00 61.20 32.70 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.02 Cupressus sempervirens 48 0.30 0.00 77.10 22.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 Fraxinus latifolia 47 0.29 0.00 19.10 72.30 4.30 2.10 2.10 0.92 Cercis canadensis 46 0.29 0.00 30.40 60.90 6.50 0.00 2.20 0.95 Cinnamomum camphora 46 0.29 0.00 73.90 19.60 6.50 0.00 0.00 1.06 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 45 0.28 0.00 8.90 66.70 22.20 0.00 2.20 0.86 Fraxinus uhdei 44 0.27 0.00 40.90 50.00 6.80 2.30 0.00 0.97 Juniperus chinensis 43 0.27 0.00 20.90 79.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 Quercus suber 43 0.27 0.00 76.70 23.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 Cedrus deodara 42 0.26 0.00 38.10 57.10 2.40 2.40 0.00 0.98 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 37 0.23 0.00 59.50 40.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 Malus sylvestris 37 0.23 0.00 48.60 45.90 5.40 0.00 0.00 1.00 Salix spp. laevigata 37 0.23 0.00 40.50 29.70 27.00 0.00 2.70 0.92 Acer palmatum 36 0.22 0.00 58.30 38.90 2.80 0.00 0.00 1.03 Acer platanoides 36 0.22 0.00 50.00 30.60 8.30 0.00 11.10 0.93 Searsia lancea 35 0.22 0.00 5.70 88.60 2.90 0.00 2.90 0.89 Ceratonia siliqua 34 0.21 0.00 26.50 55.90 14.70 0.00 2.90 0.91 Prunus domestica 32 0.20 0.00 0.00 84.40 12.50 0.00 3.10 0.86 Acer negundo 30 0.19 0.00 23.30 76.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 Populus nigra 30 0.19 0.00 13.30 80.00 3.30 3.30 0.00 0.91 Cupressus macrocarpa 29 0.18 0.00 41.40 44.80 10.30 0.00 3.40 0.95 Prunus serrulata 29 0.18 0.00 20.70 69.00 10.30 0.00 0.00 0.93 Cyclobalanopsis 28 0.17 0.00 71.40 28.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 Ma/us 28 0.17 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 Platanus racemosa 27 0.17 0.00 37.00 63.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 Quercus garryana 26 0.16 0.00 15.40 84.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 Celtis australis 24 0.15 0.00 54.20 37.50 8.30 0.00 0.00 1.01 Dodonaea viscosa 24 0.15 0.00 79.20 20.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.09 Magnoliopsida 22 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.23 Aesculus californica 21 0.13 0.00 42.90 57.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Koelreuteria paniculata 21 0.13 0.00 33.30 47.60 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 Ulmus pumila 21 0.13 0.00 23.80 76.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 Ligustrum japonicum 20 0.12 0.00 15.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 Quercus chrysolepis 20 0.12 0.00 85.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 Ulmus parvifolia 20 0.12 0.00 15.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 Cercis canadensis v. texensis 19 0.12 0.00 57.90 36.80 0.00 5.30 0.00 1.01 59 Appendix C: Tables Juglans hindsii 19 0.12 0.00 52.60 42.10 5.30 0.00 0.00 1.01 Populus fremontii 18 0.11 0.00 0.00 94.40 5.60 0.00 0.00 0.89 Populus nigra v. italica 18 0.11 0.00 27.80 61.10 5.60 5.60 0.00 0.93 Photinia serrulata 17 0.11 0.00 35.30 64.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 Acer tataricum 16 0.10 0.00 43.80 37.50 18.80 0.00 0.00 0.97 Maytenus boaria 15 0.09 0.00 20.00 66.70 13.30 0.00 0.00 0.92 Acacia melanoxylon 14 0.09 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Pinus pinea 14 0.09 0.00 14.30 85.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 Populus alba 14 0.09 0.00 42.90 57.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 13 0.08 0.00 7.70 92.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 Juniperus virginiana 13 0.08 0.00 38.50 61.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 Photinia x fraseri 13 0.08 0.00 30.80 69.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 Quercus imbricaria 13 0.08 0.00 7.70 92.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 Juglans regia 12 0.07 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Cotoneaster 11 0.07 0.00 81.80 9.10 0.00 0.00 9.10 1.03 Fraxinus velutina 11 0.07 0.00 0.00 81.80 18.20 0.00 0.00 0.87 Olea europaea 11 0.07 0.00 45.50 54.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 Rhaphiolepis indica 11 0.07 0.00 45.50 54.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 Umbellularia californica 11 0.07 0.00 9.10 90.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 Acerx freemanii 10 0.06 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Carpinus betulus 10 0.06 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Eriobotrya japonica 10 0.06 0.00 30.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 Cedrus atlantica 9 0.06 0.00 22.20 33.30 33.30 0.00 11.10 0.81 Pinus halepensis 9 0.06 0.00 22.20 66.70 11.10 0.00 0.00 0.93 Chamaecyparis 8 0.05 0.00 0.00 75.00 12.50 0.00 12.50 0.79 Morus alba 8 0.05 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 Notholithocarpus 8 0.05 0.00 0.00 62.50 25.00 12.50 0.00 0.79 densiflorus Acer macrophyllum 7 0.04 0.00 42.90 57.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Casuarina equisetifolia 7 0.04 0.00 14.30 71.40 14.30 0.00 0.00 0.91 Hamamelis virginiana 7 0.04 0.00 42.90 28.60 28.60 0.00 0.00 0.94 Triadica sebifera 7 0.04 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Amelanchier 6 0.04 0.00 83.30 16.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 Crataegus phaenopyrum 6 0.04 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Juniperus communis 6 0.04 0.00 66.70 33.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 Phoenix canariensis 6 0.04 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Prunus avium 6 0.04 0.00 83.30 0.00 16.70 0.00 0.00 1.06 Prunus ilicifolia 6 0.04 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.02 Quercus robur 6 0.04 0.00 33.30 50.00 16.70 0.00 0.00 0.95 Thuja plicata 6 0.04 0.00 0.00 16.70 50.00 33.30 0.00 0.64 Acer saccharum 5 0.03 0.00 60.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 Alnus cordata 5 0.03 0.00 60.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 Pinus canariensis 5 0.03 0.00 0.00 60.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 Pyracantha 5 0.03 0.00 40.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Appendix C: Tables 60 Schinus molle 5 0.03 0.00 80.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.09 Aesculus x carnea 4 0.02 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 Albizia julibrissin 4 0.02 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 Eucalyptus calophylla 4 0.02 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Eucalyptus globulus 4 0.02 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Nyssa sylvatica 4 0.02 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Pinus thunbergii 4 0.02 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 Prunus 4 0.02 0.00 0.00 50.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 0.68 Washingtonia robusta 4 0.02 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 Xanthocyparis nootkatensis 4 0.02 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 Acca sellowiana 3 0.02 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Betula pendula 3 0.02 0.00 33.30 66.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 Cussonia spicata 3 0.02 0.00 66.70 33.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 Fraxinus excelsior 3 0.02 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Grevillea robusta 3 0.02 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Laurus nobilis 3 0.02 0.00 66.70 33.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 Malus sieboldii ssp. sieboldii 3 0.02 0.00 33.30 66.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 Quercus palustris 3 0.02 0.00 33.30 66.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 Quercus wislizeni 3 0.02 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Syagrus romanzoffiana 3 0.02 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Vitex agnus-castus 3 0.02 0.00 33.30 66.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 Callistemon citrinus 2 0.01 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.02 Celtis laevigata 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Cornus kousa 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Cotinus coggygria 2 0.01 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.02 Crataegus 2 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Fagus sylvatica 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 Ficus carica 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Juglans californica 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Pinus patula 2 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Pinus strobus 2 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Prunus salicina 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Quercus virginiana 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Salix spp. babylonica v. 2 0.01 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.02 matsudana Sambucus canadensis 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Ulmus americana 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Ailanthus altissima 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Arbutus menziesii 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Bixa 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Callistemon viminalis 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Celtis occidentalis 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Cryptomeria japonica 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 61 Appendix C: Tables Eucalyptus rudis 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Heteromeles arbutifolia 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Morella californica 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Parrotia persica 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Picea glauca 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.45 Picea pungens 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Pinus banksiana 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Pinus ponderosa 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Pinus resinosa 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Pinus sylvestris 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Populus deltoides 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Prunus armeniaca 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Prunus dulcis 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Prunus persica 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Quercus acutissima 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Quercus coccinea 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Quercus velutina 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Schinus terebinthifolia 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Trachycarpus fortunei 1 0.01 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 Tristanionsis laurina 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 Table 24: Annual Benefits for All Species Sequoia sempervirens 5,222 32.58 77.83 13,274 599,847 5,360.23 1.91 24,677.31 43,311.44 Quercus agrifolia 1,127 7.03 7.42 1,266 54,971 491.22 0.18 2,261.48 4,018.36 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 6.31 7.14 1,218 67,861 606.41 0.22 2,791.76 4,616.48 Pistacia chinensis 947 5.91 2.84 484 5,266 47.06 0.02 216.66 748.07 Salix spp. 671 4.19 4.64 792 20,209 180.58 0.06 831.37 1,803.77 Quercus rubra 481 3.00 2.17 370 11,573 103.41 0.04 476.09 949.90 Pyrus calleryana 454 2.83 3.98 678 11,223 100.29 0.04 461.70 1,240.34 Acer rubrum 446 2.78 1.87 318 4,315 38.56 0.01 177.53 534.53 Ligustrum lucidum 354 2.21 2.39 408 13,952 124.67 0.04 573.96 1,106.58 Liriodendron tulipifera 350 2.18 1.08 184 4,555 40.70 0.01 187.39 411.85 Fraxinus angustifolia 319 1.99 2.16 368 15,791 141.11 0.05 649.63 1,158.28 Liquidambarstyraciflua 295 1.84 1.92 327 12,115 108.26 0.04 498.38 933.53 Gleditsia triacanthos 242 1.51 2.93 499 9,766 87.27 0.03 401.79 988.36 Lagerstroemia indica 238 1.48 0.63 108 892 7.97 0.00 36.70 152.48 Prunus cerasifera 173 1.08 0.77 132 1,988 17.77 0.01 81.80 231.57 Platanus occidentalis 162 1.01 1.28 218 11,077 98.98 0.04 455.70 772.33 Quercus lobata 161 1.00 1.37 233 7,993 71.42 0.03 328.82 633.32 Appendix C: Tables 62 Magnolia grandiflora 143 0.89 0.79 136 3,993 35.68 0.01 164.27 335.49 Arbutus unedo 132 0.82 0.46 78 2,104 18.80 0.01 86.57 183.09 Acer saccharinum 125 0.78 1.63 278 6,927 61.90 0.02 284.95 624.59 Fraxinus americana 118 0.74 1.03 175 5,646 50.45 0.02 232.27 457.54 Ginkgo biloba 110 0.69 0.08 14 1,184 10.58 0.00 48.71 73.01 Styphnolobium japonicum 103 0.64 1.49 254 2,858 25.54 0.01 117.59 397.42 Juglans nigra 86 0.54 1.06 181 3,836 34.28 0.01 157.82 373.50 Alnus rhombifolia 85 0.53 0.35 60 2,190 19.57 0.01 90.10 170.14 Rhamnus alaternus 83 0.52 0.25 43 241 2.15 0.00 9.92 54.85 Robinia pseudoacacia 80 0.50 0.69 117 1,720 15.37 0.01 70.78 203.17 Pinus radiata 77 0.48 0.81 138 4,370 39.05 0.01 179.79 356.73 Quercus ilex 76 0.47 0.76 129 4,415 39.45 0.01 181.62 350.17 Sequoiadendron giganteum 75 0.47 1.53 261 6,835 61.08 0.02 281.20 602.97 Eucalyptus nicholii 71 0.44 1.04 177 27,663 247.20 0.09 1,138.05 1,562.25 Salix spp. babylonica 59 0.37 0.61 104 5,416 48.40 0.02 222.83 375.59 Acer buergerianum 57 0.36 0.19 32 552 4.93 0.00 22.69 59.98 Salix spp. lasiolepis 54 0.34 0.49 84 1,618 14.46 0.01 66.57 164.94 Eucalyptus polyanthemos 51 0.32 1.34 228 14,370 128.41 0.05 591.16 947.33 Calocedrus decurrens 49 0.31 0.37 64 5,075 45.35 0.02 208.79 317.65 Celtis sinensis 49 0.31 0.07 12 1,506 13.46 0.00 61.97 87.07 Cupressus sempervirens 48 0.30 0.27 47 866 7.74 0.00 35.64 90.15 Fraxinus latifolia 47 0.29 0.24 40 1,456 13.01 0.00 59.91 113.35 Cercis conadensis 46 0.29 0.07 12 170 1.52 0.00 6.98 20.52 Cinnamomum camphora 46 0.29 0.87 149 2,241 20.03 0.01 92.19 261.22 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 45 0.28 1.62 277 13,026 116.40 0.04 535.86 929.12 Fraxinus uhdei 44 0.27 0.67 114 4,189 37.43 0.01 172.33 323.94 Juniperus chinensis 43 0.27 0.44 76 1,534 13.71 0.00 63.11 152.50 Quercus suber 43 0.27 0.32 54 2,978 26.61 0.01 122.53 202.99 Cedrus deodara 42 0.26 0.48 82 1,678 15.00 0.01 69.05 166.18 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 37 0.23 0.26 45 2,543 22.72 0.01 104.60 172.17 Malus sylvestris 37 0.23 0.16 27 239 2.14 0.00 9.85 38.66 Salix spp. laevigata 37 0.23 0.43 74 1,711 15.29 0.01 70.39 159.58 Acer palmatum 36 0.22 0.08 14 323 2.89 0.00 13.29 29.92 Acer platanoides 36 0.22 0.10 17 161 1.44 0.00 6.62 24.90 Searsia lancea 35 0.22 0.10 18 524 4.68 0.00 21.55 43.84 Ceratonia siliqua 34 0.21 0.17 28 938 8.38 0.00 38.57 75.26 Prunus domestica 32 0.20 0.12 20 158 1.41 0.00 6.49 28.30 Acer negundo 30 0.19 0.16 28 568 5.08 0.00 23.39 56.19 Populus nigra 30 0.19 0.25 42 947 8.46 0.00 38.94 89.47 Cupressus macrocarpa 29 0.18 0.06 9 1,493 13.34 0.00 61.43 84.21 Prunus serrulata 29 0.18 0.07 12 69 0.61 0.00 2.82 15.02 Cyclobalanopsis 28 0.17 0.11 18 269 2.41 0.00 11.08 31.43 63 Appendix C: Tables Ma/us 28 0.17 0.14 24 246 2.20 0.00 10.14 36.59 Platanus racemosa 27 0.17 0.20 34 3,219 28.76 0.01 132.42 194.75 Quercus garryana 26 0.16 0.09 15 412 3.68 0.00 16.94 35.18 Celtis australis 24 0.15 0.03 5 267 2.39 0.00 10.99 17.95 Dodonaea viscosa 24 0.15 0.19 32 319 2.85 0.00 13.11 48.07 Magnoliopsida 22 0.14 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Aesculus californica 21 0.13 0.06 10 1,071 9.57 0.00 44.07 63.64 Koelreuteria paniculata 21 0.13 0.08 14 498 4.45 0.00 20.50 38.86 Ulmus pumila 21 0.13 0.19 33 631 5.64 0.00 25.98 64.77 Ligustrum japonicum 20 0.12 0.08 13 183 1.64 0.00 7.53 22.14 Quercus chrysolepis 20 0.12 0.07 12 307 2.74 0.00 12.63 27.05 Ulmus parvifolia 20 0.12 0.14 23 288 2.58 0.00 11.86 37.57 Cercis conadensis v. texensis 19 0.12 0.04 6 71 0.63 0.00 2.91 9.88 Juglans hindsii 19 0.12 0.12 21 704 6.29 0.00 28.97 56.02 Populus fremontii 18 0.11 0.18 30 553 4.94 0.00 22.73 58.00 Populus nigra v. italica 18 0.11 0.21 37 1,266 11.31 0.00 52.07 99.98 Photinia serrulata 17 0.11 0.10 17 189 1.69 0.00 7.76 26.61 Acer tataricum 16 0.10 0.03 6 185 1.65 0.00 7.60 14.90 Maytenus boaria 15 0.09 0.17 29 485 4.33 0.00 19.94 52.90 Acacia melanoxylon 14 0.09 0.06 10 1,219 10.89 0.00 50.15 71.23 Pinus pinea 14 0.09 0.24 41 1,614 14.43 0.01 66.41 121.46 Populus alba 14 0.09 0.33 57 1,728 15.44 0.01 71.09 143.65 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 13 0.08 0.49 83 4,565 40.79 0.01 187.81 311.46 Juniperus virginiana 13 0.08 0.06 10 351 3.14 0.00 14.44 27.28 Photinia x fraseri 13 0.08 0.08 14 156 1.39 0.00 6.41 21.90 Quercus imbricaria 13 0.08 0.06 11 120 1.08 0.00 4.95 16.90 Juglans regia 12 0.07 0.19 32 917 8.19 0.00 37.72 77.47 Cotoneaster 11 0.07 0.03 5 41 0.36 0.00 1.67 6.80 Fraxinus velutina 11 0.07 0.08 13 418 3.74 0.00 17.20 34.42 Oleo europaea 11 0.07 0.04 7 190 1.70 0.00 7.81 16.11 Rhaphiolepis indica 11 0.07 0.20 34 441 3.94 0.00 18.14 56.01 Umbellularia californica 11 0.07 0.09 16 336 3.00 0.00 13.82 32.38 Acer x freemanii 10 0.06 0.04 7 123 1.09 0.00 5.04 13.00 Carpinus betulus 10 0.06 0.06 11 258 2.31 0.00 10.62 23.93 Eriobotrya japonica 10 0.06 0.06 10 93 0.83 0.00 3.83 14.19 Cedrus atlantica 9 0.06 0.07 13 296 2.65 0.00 12.19 27.46 Pinus halepensis 9 0.06 0.07 13 505 4.51 0.00 20.76 37.84 Chamaecyparis 8 0.05 0.04 7 132 1.18 0.00 5.43 13.67 Notholithocarpus densiflorus 8 0.05 0.04 7 265 2.36 0.00 10.89 20.74 Morus alba 8 0.05 0.08 13 182 1.63 0.00 7.50 22.48 Acer macrophyllum 7 0.04 0.03 5 79 0.71 0.00 3.26 8.92 Casuarina equisetifolia 7 0.04 0.30 52 273 2.44 0.00 11.22 65.44 Appendix C: Tables 64 Homamelis virginiana 7 0.04 0.02 4 301 2.69 0.00 12.38 19.13 Triadica sebifera 7 0.04 0.07 11 165 1.48 0.00 6.80 19.40 Amelanchier 6 0.04 0.01 1 72 0.64 0.00 2.97 4.92 Crataegus phaenopyrum 6 0.04 0.03 5 34 0.31 0.00 1.41 6.26 Juniperus communis 6 0.04 0.02 3 58 0.52 0.00 2.40 5.60 Phoenix canariensis 6 0.04 0.01 2 249 2.23 0.00 10.26 14.62 Prunus avium 6 0.04 0.03 4 51 0.46 0.00 2.11 7.01 Prunus ilicifolia 6 0.04 0.02 3 14 0.12 0.00 0.57 3.32 Quercus robur 6 0.04 0.06 11 319 2.85 0.00 13.13 26.70 Thuja plicata 6 0.04 0.01 2 194 1.74 0.00 7.99 11.42 Acer saccharum 5 0.03 0.01 1 42 0.37 0.00 1.72 3.55 Alnus cordata 5 0.03 0.03 6 288 2.58 0.00 11.87 19.99 Pinus canariensis 5 0.03 0.05 9 541 4.84 0.00 22.26 36.37 Pyracantha 5 0.03 0.01 2 49 0.44 0.00 2.02 4.63 Schinus molle 5 0.03 0.02 4 192 1.71 0.00 7.89 13.83 Aesculus x carnea 4 0.02 0.00 0 9 0.08 0.00 0.38 0.95 Albizia julibrissin 4 0.02 0.01 2 165 1.48 0.00 6.80 9.80 Eucalyptus calophylla 4 0.02 0.02 3 24 0.21 0.00 0.98 4.39 Eucalyptus globulus 4 0.02 0.14 24 1,192 10.65 0.00 49.04 83.92 Nyssa sylvatica 4 0.02 0.02 4 112 1.00 0.00 4.61 9.14 Pinus thunbergii 4 0.02 0.01 1 65 0.58 0.00 2.69 4.72 Prunus 4 0.02 0.01 2 44 0.39 0.00 1.80 4.60 Washingtonio robusta 4 0.02 0.01 2 141 1.26 0.00 5.82 8.61 Xanthocyparis nootkatensis 4 0.02 0.12 20 270 2.42 0.00 11.12 33.69 Acca sellowiana 3 0.02 0.01 1 10 0.09 0.00 0.40 1.40 Betula pendula 3 0.02 0.03 5 79 0.70 0.00 3.24 8.49 Cussonia spicata 3 0.02 0.00 0 34 0.30 0.00 1.40 2.02 Froxinus excelsior 3 0.02 0.03 5 150 1.34 0.00 6.18 12.69 Grevillea robusta 3 0.02 0.04 7 107 0.96 0.00 4.42 12.36 Laurus nobilis 3 0.02 0.08 14 157 1.40 0.00 6.46 21.62 Malus sieboldii ssp. sieboldii 3 0.02 0.01 1 12 0.11 0.00 0.51 2.02 Quercus palustris 3 0.02 0.02 3 48 0.43 0.00 1.99 5.31 Quercus wislizeni 3 0.02 0.02 4 139 1.24 0.00 5.73 11.06 Syagrus romanzoffiana 3 0.02 0.00 0 25 0.22 0.00 1.04 1.56 Vitex agnus-castus 3 0.02 0.01 1 8 0.07 0.00 0.33 1.63 Callistemon citrinus 2 0.01 0.02 3 42 0.38 0.00 1.74 5.28 Celtis laevigata 2 0.01 0.00 1 195 1.74 0.00 8.02 10.42 Cotinus coggygria 2 0.01 0.01 1 5 0.05 0.00 0.21 1.30 Corpus kousa 2 0.01 0.00 0 2 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.18 Crataegus 2 0.01 0.00 1 6 0.06 0.00 0.27 1.13 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2 0.01 0.06 10 207 1.85 0.00 8.50 20.65 Fagus sylvatica 2 0.01 0.01 1 54 0.48 0.00 2.20 3.95 65 Appendix C: Tables Ficus carica 2 0.01 0.01 2 19 0.17 0.00 0.77 2.66 Juglans californica 2 0.01 0.01 1 25 0.22 0.00 1.02 2.45 Pinus patula 2 0.01 0.02 3 105 0.94 0.00 4.33 8.13 Pinus strobus 2 0.01 0.01 2 58 0.52 0.00 2.41 4.63 Prunus salicina 2 0.01 0.00 1 4 0.03 0.00 0.15 0.70 Quercus virginiana 2 0.01 0.01 1 3 0.03 0.00 0.12 1.25 Sambucus canadensis 2 0.01 0.00 0 4 0.03 0.00 0.15 0.55 Salix spp. babylonica v. 2 0.02 3 63 0.56 0.00 2.58 6.35 matsudana 0.01 Ulmus americana 2 0.01 0.02 3 57 0.51 0.00 2.35 5.50 Ailanthus altissima 1 0.01 0.02 4 92 0.82 0.00 3.77 8.57 Arbutus menziesii 1 0.01 0.01 1 10 0.09 0.00 0.41 1.37 Bixa 1 0.01 0.00 0 6 0.05 0.00 0.23 0.59 Callistemon viminalis 1 0.01 0.00 0 3 0.02 0.00 0.11 0.54 Celtis occidentalis 1 0.01 0.00 0 5 0.04 0.00 0.19 0.36 Cryptomeria japonica 1 0.01 0.00 1 20 0.18 0.00 0.83 1.71 Eucalyptus rudis 1 0.01 0.00 0 295 2.64 0.00 12.14 15.03 Heteromeles arbutifolia 1 0.01 0.00 0 2 0.02 0.00 0.10 0.61 Morella californica 1 0.01 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.09 Parrotia persica 1 0.01 0.00 0 16 0.14 0.00 0.64 1.21 Pinus banksiana 1 0.01 0.00 0 4 0.04 0.00 0.17 0.55 Picea glauca 1 0.01 0.00 0 1 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.10 Pinus ponderosa 1 0.01 0.01 1 57 0.51 0.00 2.34 3.73 Picea pungens 1 0.01 0.00 0 7 0.06 0.00 0.27 0.64 Pinus resinosa 1 0.01 0.01 1 38 0.34 0.00 1.56 3.34 Pin us sylvestris 1 0.01 0.01 1 49 0.44 0.00 2.03 3.75 Populus deltoides 1 0.01 0.05 8 152 1.36 0.00 6.25 15.43 Prunus armeniaca 1 0.01 0.00 0 4 0.03 0.00 0.16 0.67 Prunus dulcis 1 0.01 0.01 1 20 0.17 0.00 0.80 2.26 Prunus persica 1 0.01 0.00 1 6 0.05 0.00 0.24 1.06 Quercus acutissima 1 0.01 0.01 1 15 0.13 0.00 0.61 1.95 Quercus coccinea 1 0.01 0.01 2 26 0.23 0.00 1.06 2.99 Quercus velutina 1 0.01 0.02 3 52 0.46 0.00 2.13 5.36 Schinus terebinthifolia 1 0.01 0.00 0 111 0.99 0.00 4.56 5.71 Trachycarpus fortunei 1 0.01 0.00 0 4 0.03 0.00 0.15 0.34 Tristaniopsis laurina 1 0.01 0.00 1 9 0.08 0.00 0.36 1.12 Total 16,027 00 0• Appendix C: Tables 66 Table 25. Replacement Value Sequoia sempervirens 5,222 32.58 40,174,517 65.78 Quercus agrifolia 1,127 7.03 2,647,726 4.34 Platanus x hybrida 1,011 6.31 2,914,259 4.77 Pistocia chinensis 947 5.91 538,742 0.88 Salix spp. 671 4.19 1,030,634 1.69 Quercus rubra 481 3.00 583,094 0.95 Pyrus calleryana 454 2.83 805,412 1.32 Acer rubrum 446 2.78 340,659 0.56 Ligustrum lucidum 354 2.21 577,888 0.95 Liriodendron tulipifera 350 2.18 253,202 0.41 Fraxinus angustifolia 319 1.99 642,086 1.05 Liquidambar styraciflua 295 1.84 656,750 1.08 Gleditsia triacanthos 242 1.51 521,726 0.85 Lagerstroemia indica 238 1.48 148,906 0.24 Prunus cerasifera 173 1.08 169,779 0.28 Platanus occidentalis 162 1.01 474,379 0.78 Quercus lobata 161 1.00 454,821 0.74 Magnolia grandiflora 143 0.89 248,963 0.41 Arbutus unedo 132 0.82 115,238 0.19 Acer saccharinum 125 0.78 371,206 0.61 Fraxinus americana 118 0.74 239,770 0.39 Ginkgo biloba 110 0.69 69,054 0.11 Styphnolobium japonicum 103 0.64 208,269 0.34 Juglans nigra 86 0.54 195,621 0.32 Alnus rhombifolia 85 0.53 109,472 0.18 Rhamnus alaternus 83 0.52 44,620 0.07 Robinia pseudoacacia 80 0.50 90,515 0.15 Pinus radiata 77 0.48 428,449 0.70 Quercus ilex 76 0.47 179,581 0.29 Sequoiadendron giganteum 75 0.47 485,061 0.79 Eucalyptus nicholii 71 0.44 735,381 1.20 Salixspp. babylonica 59 0.37 259,592 0.43 Acer buergerianum 57 0.36 37,101 0.06 Salix spp. lasiolepis 54 0.34 74,155 0.12 Eucalyptus polyanthemos 51 0.32 344,893 0.56 Calocedrus decurrens 49 0.31 288,779 0.47 Celtis sinensis 49 0.31 63,728 0.10 Cupressus sempervirens 48 0.30 90,809 0.15 Fraxinus latifolia 47 0.29 73,813 0.12 Cercis canadensis 46 0.29 17,216 0.03 Cinnamomum camphora 46 0.29 117,388 0.19 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 45 0.28 320,277 0.52 67 Appendix C: Tables Fraxinus uhdei 44 0.27 209,446 0.34 Juniperus chinensis 43 0.27 86,793 0.14 Quercus suber 43 0.27 135,388 0.22 Cedrus deodara 42 0.26 163,324 0.27 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 37 0.23 101,420 0.17 Malus sylvestris 37 0.23 34,964 0.06 Salix spp. laevigata 37 0.23 65,263 0.11 Acer palmatum 36 0.22 27,494 0.05 Acer platanoides 36 0.22 12,501 0.02 Searsia lancea 35 0.22 88,645 0.15 Ceratonia siliqua 34 0.21 56,027 0.09 Prunus domestica 32 0.20 19,877 0.03 Acer negundo 30 0.19 23,655 0.04 Populus nigra 30 0.19 38,169 0.06 Cupressus macrocarpa 29 0.18 160,458 0.26 Prunus serrulata 29 0.18 8,921 0.01 Cyclobalanopsis 28 0.17 21,836 0.04 Ma/us 28 0.17 30,054 0.05 Platanus racemosa 27 0.17 135,626 0.22 Quercus garryana 26 0.16 33,078 0.05 Celtis australis 24 0.15 20,441 0.03 Dodonaea viscosa 24 0.15 20,764 0.03 Magnoliopsida 22 0.14 0 0.00 Aesculus californica 21 0.13 30,299 0.05 Koelreuteria paniculata 21 0.13 18,487 0.03 Ulmus pumila 21 0.13 26,720 0.04 Ligustrum japonicum 20 0.12 12,168 0.02 Quercus chrysolepis 20 0.12 24,233 0.04 Ulmus parvifolia 20 0.12 23,671 0.04 Cercis canadensis v. texensis 19 0.12 7,058 0.01 Juglans hindsii 19 0.12 28,692 0.05 Populus fremontii 18 0.11 16,513 0.03 Populus nigra v. italica 18 0.11 30,926 0.05 Photinia serrulata 17 0.11 16,664 0.03 Acer tataricum 16 0.10 11,218 0.02 Maytenus boaria 15 0.09 31,876 0.05 Acacia melanoxylon 14 0.09 65,811 0.11 Pinus pinea 14 0.09 158,252 0.26 Populus alba 14 0.09 22,789 0.04 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 13 0.08 132,433 0.22 luniperus virginiana 13 0.08 24,054 0.04 Photinia x fraseri 13 0.08 12,789 0.02 Quercus imbricaria 13 0.08 13,392 0.02 Juglans regia 12 0.07 26,130 0.04 Appendix C: Tables 68 Cotoneaster 11 0.07 7,088 0.01 Fraxinus velutina 11 0.07 23,112 0.04 Oleo europaea 11 0.07 11,392 0.02 Rhaphiolepis indica 11 0.07 38,687 0.06 Umbellularia californica 11 0.07 15,582 0.03 Acer x freemanii 10 0.06 8,495 0.01 Carpinus betulus 10 0.06 12,416 0.02 Eriobotrya japonica 10 0.06 9,812 0.02 Cedrus atlantica 9 0.06 39,081 0.06 Pinus halepensis 9 0.06 42,234 0.07 Chamaecyparis 8 0.05 13,925 0.02 Notholithocarpus densiflorus 8 0.05 10,393 0.02 Morus alba 8 0.05 13,979 0.02 Acer macrophyllum 7 0.04 5,168 0.01 Casuarina equisetifolia 7 0.04 52,002 0.09 Hamamelis virginiana 7 0.04 7,789 0.01 Triadica sebifera 7 0.04 20,489 0.03 Amelanchier 6 0.04 4,124 0.01 Crataegus phaenopyrum 6 0.04 6,761 0.01 Juniperus communis 6 0.04 5,932 0.01 Phoenix canariensis 6 0.04 17,500 0.03 Prunus avium 6 0.04 5,111 0.01 Prunus ilicifolia 6 0.04 2,192 0.00 Quercus robur 6 0.04 13,990 0.02 Thuja plicata 6 0.04 18,509 0.03 Acer saccharum 5 0.03 2,891 0.00 Alnus cordata 5 0.03 10,936 0.02 Pinus canariensis 5 0.03 29,365 0.05 Pyracantha 5 0.03 4,890 0.01 Schinus molle 5 0.03 17,913 0.03 Aesculus x cornea 4 0.02 278 0.00 Albizia julibrissin 4 0.02 10,662 0.02 Eucalyptus calophylla 4 0.02 2,558 0.00 Eucalyptus globulus 4 0.02 31,055 0.05 Nyssa sylvatica 4 0.02 5,515 0.01 Pinus thunbergii 4 0.02 5,142 0.01 Prunus 4 0.02 2,975 0.00 Washingtonio robusta 4 0.02 1,183 0.00 Xanthocyparis nootkatensis 4 0.02 23,429 0.04 Acca sellowiana 3 0.02 1,052 0.00 Betula pendula 3 0.02 3,575 0.01 Cussonia spicata 3 0.02 1,958 0.00 Fraxinus excelsior 3 0.02 6,215 0.01 Grevillea robusta 3 0.02 6,781 0.01 69 Appendix C: Tables Laurus nobilis 3 0.02 10,538 0.02 Malus sieboldii ssp. sieboldii 3 0.02 2,185 0.00 Quercus palustris 3 0.02 2,465 0.00 Quercus wislizeni 3 0.02 7,488 0.01 Syagrus romanzoffiana 3 0.02 1,247 0.00 Vitex agnus-castus 3 0.02 1,287 0.00 Callistemon citrinus 2 0.01 2,593 0.00 Celtis laevigata 2 0.01 13,776 0.02 Cotinus coggygria 2 0.01 827 0.00 Cornus kousa 2 0.01 82 0.00 Crataegus 2 0.01 1,344 0.00 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2 0.01 6,016 0.01 Fagus sylvatica 2 0.01 2,056 0.00 Ficus carica 2 0.01 2,039 0.00 Juglans californica 2 0.01 1,947 0.00 Pinus patula 2 0.01 5,721 0.01 Pinus strobus 2 0.01 4,240 0.01 Prunus salicina 2 0.01 393 0.00 Quercus virginiana 2 0.01 391 0.00 Sambucus canadensis 2 0.01 1,191 0.00 Salix spp. babylonica v. 2 2,707 0.00 matsudana 0.01 Ulmus americana 2 0.01 2,354 0.00 Ailanthus altissima 1 0.01 3,953 0.01 Arbutus menziesii 1 0.01 867 0.00 Bixa 1 0.01 714 0.00 Callistemon viminalis 1 0.01 561 0.00 Celtis occidentalis 1 0.01 292 0.00 Cryptomeria japonica 1 0.01 1,212 0.00 Eucalyptus rudis 1 0.01 11,162 0.02 Heteromeles arbutifolia 1 0.01 561 0.00 Morello californica 1 0.01 105 0.00 Parrotia persica 1 0.01 937 0.00 Pinus banksiana 1 0.01 741 0.00 Picea glauca 1 0.01 41 0.00 Pinus ponderosa 1 0.01 2,543 0.00 Picea pungens 1 0.01 956 0.00 Pinus resinosa 1 0.01 2,236 0.00 Pinus sylvestris 1 0.01 2,713 0.00 Populus deltoides 1 0.01 3,523 0.01 Prunus armeniaca 1 0.01 292 0.00 Prunus dulcis 1 0.01 1,211 0.00 Prunus persica 1 0.01 835 0.00 Quercus acutissima 1 0.01 983 0.00 Appendix C: Tables 70 Quercus coccinea 1 0.01 2,039 0.00 Quercus velutina 1 0.01 3,506 0.01 Schinus terebinthifolia 1 0.01 8,356 0.01 Trachycarpus fortunei 1 0.01 388 0.00 Tristanioasis laurina 1 0.01 937 0.00 71 Appendix C: Tables Rohnert Pork's Community _Tree Resource _ _ •� Management Strategmies Presented by Anne Fenkner Davey Resource Group UTO VZO 9 1 to Community Tree Resource acture & Maintenance Maintenan position Needs Strategie Terminology Community trees (public trees) Public rights -of -way and medians (street trees) Parks Trees at city facilities Does not include private trees Residential Commercial / Industrial zones PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY ** 3 Yt'.. ��. � `7F s ut-I r'If t r: P-0 k a. 410 1 /n so mm f'i�:41v�- 1� n ~ _� � �� 7 i. r�o}' � 1, v �'•'!•-, ": , °�. .. Community Tree Resource 16,027 trees 9,364 tons of carbon stored $61.1 million to replace 513.4 acres of canopy cover 963 vacant sites & stumps PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY ** 5 Species Diversity a 'u a) CL LO Sequoia sempervirens Quercus agrifolia Platanus x hybrida Pistacia chinensis salix Quercus rubra Pyrus calleryana Acer rubrum Ligustrum lucidum Liriodendron tulipifera Fraxinus angustifolia Liquidambar styraciflua Gleditsia triacanthos Lagerstroemia indica Prunus cerasifera Platanus occidentalis Quercus lobata all other species PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY � 7.0% 6.3% 5.9% M 4.2% W 3.0% ■ 2.8% � 2.8% 2.2% 2.2% 2.0% 1. 8% M 1.5% ■ 1.5% ■ 1.1% ■ 1.0% ■ 1.0% 21.1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% of Population 32.6% 35% A Age Distribution 25% 20% 5% 0% Ideal Age Distribution Total Population m 0-4 4-8 8-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42-48 48+ DBH Class (inches) PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY 7 Annual Benefits 1 million gallons of stormwater runoff diverted 3.3 tons of air pollutants removed 151 tons sequestered carbon Carbon Sequestration $25,701 33.3% Pollution Removal $42,226 54.8% Avoided Runoff $9,1 72 11.9% PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY Tree Condition 93.3% in fair or better condition 4.7% in poor or worse condition Fair 41-60% 42.5% PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY * Poor21-40% 4. 7% Very Poor 6-20% <1% Dead 0-5% 1.3% Excellent 81-100% <1% 0 4 5anc, ds' S _ f T. 1 •� & �h_lqhq'% Y L� f ME jr AL,Oiia jpI PRE y, � , tV � �y -4• •w .tea - ' W . , rs t ,�• r ti �• 4, FL 4 x•+. Maintenance Identified Maintenance Category Routine Prune Priority 1 Prune Priority 2 Prune Priority 1 Removal Priority 2 Removal Priority 3 Removal Training Prune All Maintenance PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY ** Number of Trees 14,279 155 667 85 192 142 507 16,027 Priority Prune 822 5% Priority Removal 419 3% Training Prune 507 3% Maintenance Identified Cont. 2.7% require inspections 13.6% clearance pruning PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY ** 12 Current Annual Maintenance Investment Investments Pruning Removals Young Tree Care Tree Inspections Administration Maintenance/Miscellaneous All Maintenance Total $ 18,786 23,482 23,482 4,696 18,786 4,696 $93,928 PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY ** 13 Inventory Management Plan Schedules priority maintenance over 5 years Year Work Scheduled Year 1 Priority 1 prune and large priority 1 removals Years 2-4 Priority 1 prune and small priority 1 removals Year 5 Priority 2 prune and priority 2 and 3 removals Schedules planting, training prune &stump grind PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY El Summary of Work Years 1-5 120 100 :I M 20 0 Priority Prune Priority Tree Stump Grind Tree Removal Replacement Maintainence Type 60 ❑ Year 1 Training Prune ❑ Year 2 ❑ Year 3 ❑ Year 4 Year 5 PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY ** 15 Excess Priority Work Maintenance Priority Prune Priority Tree Removal Stump Grind Tree Replacement Training Prune Number of Trees 182 261 341 207 PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY ** UM Maintenance Strategies Tree planting Strategies City Goal: Increase tree coverage by 12% by 2035 Replace trees that are removed Plant all available sites to reach 100% stocking level Plant selection using "right tree, right place" guidelines Prioritize planting large statured and native trees Incorporate successional planting of important species PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY ** In Trey Planting Strategies Cont. Prioritize diverse species selection to increase resiliency Develop and execute planting plans Consider alternative funding sources Create new planting spaces Engage community to increase tree plantings on private property Provide tree care education to empower to community to care for trees on private property PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY ** IN Maintenance Strategies Address existing and new work as soon as possible Prioritize large priority pruning and removals Priority 1 work is recommended to be completed in 12 months Priority 2 work is recommended to be completed in 24 months Priority 3 work is less urgent and should be completed after priority 1 and 2 work Schedule routine maintenance for all community trees Pruning on a 5-year to 7-year cycle Training pruning for young trees Regularly inspect trees PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY 20 Maintenance Strategies Cont, Monitor species with the potential to become invasive Monitor species performance Update the inventory as maintenance occurs Consider adding additional information Follow integrated pest management and best management practices when monitoring for and dealing with pests and diseases Seek additional funding where possible to proactively manage the urban forest PERSONAL COMMENTS BY PRESENTING AGENCY ** 21 Questions? . DAMEY Resource Group I:Izl Q%hnv&9w& 22 N F eT LI) �M1LIFARpti� ITEM NO. 9.13. Mission Statement "We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Communityfor Today and Tomorrow." CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: January 28, 2025 Department Public Works Department Submitted By: Vanessa Garrett, Director of Public Works Prepared By: Eydie Tacata, Senior Public Works Analyst Agenda Title: Receive Informational Update on Capital Improvements Program (CIP); Discuss and Direct Staff on Planned FY 25-30 Projects; and Adopt a Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2024-25 (FY 2024-25) CIP Budget to Appropriate $1,003,000 from Public Facilities Fee Fund (Fund 4250) for Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements (CIP2201) Increase the Project Budget for CIP2201 from $2,400,000 to $3,403,000 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive informational update on Capital Improvements Program (CIP), adopt a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2024-25 (FY 2024-25) CIP Budget to appropriate $1,003,000 from Public Facilities Fee Fund (Fund 4250) for Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements (CIP2201) and increase the project budget for CIP2201 from $2,400,000 to $3,403,000. BACKGROUND: On June 25, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-053 approving the City's Operating Budget for FY 2024-25 and the FY 2024-25 CIP budget, which gave additional budget appropriations to seven (7) existing projects and carried over the budgets of the remaining capital projects, without appropriation of additional funds. Since that budget adoption, several CIP projects have been completed. Many are in -progress and a few will need budget amendments to increase the funds available to complete the projects. At this fiscal - year midpoint, staff wants to inform and prepare the Council for (1) anticipated CIP budget amendments that will likely be proposed in the current fiscal year and (2) consideration of the upcoming FY 2025-26 CIP budget and 5-Year CIP Plan. The discussion section below provides information for this purpose. A request for additional appropriations for the Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements (CIP2201) is also included in this City Council item. The additional appropriations will allow the project to be completed. DISCUSSION: With this item, City staff wants to achieve the following objectives: oo Provide an early draft of the FY 2025-26 CIP Budget and Five -Year CIP Program so the City Council is aware of the City's capital needs to address a variety of infrastructure projects OAK #4907-7886-6704 v1 ITEM NO. 9.13. oo Give the City Council an opportunity to discuss the projects recommended for FY 2025-26 funding as well as planned FY 2027-2030 projects. Staff will bring back formal proposals for prioritizing and funding those projects in the future for Council action oo Adjust appropriations for one project (CIP 2201 Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements) that can proceed in FY 2024-25, given a sufficient budget Five -Year CIP Plan Implements the General Plan, Other Plans, Various Agreements and City Council Priorities The City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi -year planning instrument that drives the evaluation, identification, and funding of capital infrastructure projects for renovation, repair, and new construction. Capital projects range from road maintenance or construction; public facilities renovations and building systems upgrades; rehabilitation of recreational assets such as courts, fields, and playgrounds; and repair or replacement of water and sewer lines. While the CIP includes broad categories of assets as described above and more, utilities (water and sewer) infrastructure is not included in this informational update. The utilities CIP will be presented at a later date with a discussion about water rates. The CIP advances the City's vision through capital projects that implement the City Council's Strategic Priorities, General Plan, and Specific Plans (e.g., University District Specific Plan), planned developments (e.g., SOMO Village), and Priority Development Areas (e.g., Central Rohnert Park Priority Development Area, which includes Downtown). These plans — and the environmental documents that support them — identify capital projects to support new residents and businesses and also mitigate environmental or other impacts of land use intensification or expansion. Other documents such as the Public Facilities Finance Plan, development agreements, and memoranda of understanding with neighboring jurisdictions list capital projects that the City is obligated to fund, build or maintain, and are also tied to the various plans mentioned above. Local or regional planning documents like the Local Road Safety Plan, Active Transportation Plan, Parks Master Plan, or Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to name a few, also identify capital projects that carry out policies and objectives of the City's General Plan. Finally, projects included in the CIP may also be listed in strategic implementation plans of voter -approved initiatives (e.g., sales taxes for transportation or fire prevention and emergency services), or in bond measures and redevelopment tax proceeds obligation plans. Any of the projects in the above -named and similar plans may be in the Five -Year CIP, but ideally, the CIP includes projects that align with the City Council's Strategic Priorities and are informed by assessments and studies that develop more detailed project concepts and estimated costs. The City has several documents in place to assist with planning efforts such as: oo Preventative Maintenance Plan for streets: Every two years the City assesses the condition of all streets in the City, and a work plan is developed for future road maintenance projects. oo Building Condition Assessment: The City completed an assessment of 62 city -owned facilities, and identified and prioritized deferred maintenance across all the facilities. 00 Pathway Maintenance Plan: The City has completed a condition assessment of its pathways. The assessment assists in prioritizing the pathways that should be replaced. Significant Capital and Major Maintenance Programs are Included for Consideration in Proposed 5-Year CIP Plan and FY 2025-26 CIP Budget OAK #4907-7886-6704 v1 2 ITEM NO. 9.13. The draft Five -Year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Budget: FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30 (Attachment A) lists existing and proposed capital projects, major maintenance projects/programs, and studies/assessments that inform CIP projects or programs. Shown on Attachment A are the following: oo Budgeted funding for projects already approved; oo Anticipated budget amendments for the remainder of the current fiscal year (FY 2024-25); oo Proposed project budgets in FY 2025-26 for existing and new projects; and oo "Planned" budgets in fiscal years FY 2026-27 through FY 2029-30. The 5-Year CIP incorporates projects that should be implemented in the planning timeframe. Staff also reviews available funding, prioritization criteria (e.g., critical safety needs, obligations via agreements, regulatory drivers, etc.), and foreseeable staff and outside resources available (e.g., consultant and contractors) to successfully deliver projects. The "planned" budget years (Years 2-5 of the 5-Year CIP) are not shown as fiscally -constrained; in other words, the estimated project budgets shown are what is needed to deliver the project and are not limited to actual funding available. This approach provides a more comprehensive picture of the challenge before the City to address deferred maintenance, expansion projects, and existing infrastructure preservation — sometimes competing for the same funding sources. Of note and described below are significant capital and major maintenance projects/programs included in the Five -Year CIP and not shown as fiscally -constrained. These are substantial in both scope and cost, requiring forward -looking budget planning as some of the funding is not yet secured. These are highlighted to increase the City Council's awareness of longer -term projects and initiatives that must be balanced with other immediate needs of the community. oo Pavement Preservation. One of the City's largest assets is the street network. Every two years, the City has a street condition assessment conducted which determines the "pavement condition index" (PCI) of the City's network and individual streets. The PCI scale is 0 — 100, with "100" being the condition of a new street. Street maintenance costs decrease exponentially when pavement is maintained at a minimum of "70" PCI. At the end of 2023, the City's street network PCI was rated "63" out of "100". While this PCI is still considered "Good" condition, the 2023 assessment concluded that without more aggressive preventative and rehabilitation projects, the pavement will start to degrade exponentially. The Five -Year CIP shows the budget levels necessary for projects to bring the PCI up to "68", including a proposed FY 2025-26 budget of over $9.9 million toward pavement preservation. The typical funding sources used by the City for pavement preservation are Gas Tax allocations and local sales tax proceeds restricted to transportation uses (i.e., Measure M Transportation and Measure DD, which is referred to as "GoSonoma"), as well as the General Fund and Casino mitigation funds. oo Building Condition Assessment Implementation. The Building Condition Assessment conducted in 2022 determined a total capital renewal cost of almost $49.7 million to address conditions at 62 City -owned facilities and structures. Of that $49.7 million cost, over $25.9 million is the cost to address Priority 1 projects that present conditions which require "immediate" action to: (a) correct a cited safety hazard; (b) stop accelerated deterioration; and/or (c) return a facility to operation. The types of funding sources used by the City for these types of projects include the General Fund, facilities fee revenues, Casino mitigation funds, bond monies, other special revenues, or sales tax proceeds (e.g., Measure M Parks). OAK #4907-7886-6704 v1 ITEM NO. 9.13. oo Casino Expansion Projects. The Five -Year CIP includes five (5) projects to mitigate the traffic impacts of the expansion of the Graton Casino. The total estimated cost of these projects is almost $41 million. The Second Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria provided just under $4 million of the needed amount. The remainder of the funding needed would need to come from the regular MOU annual contributions or other sources (e.g., the General Fund). oo Other Development -Driven Projects. The Copeland Creek Detention Basin ("Basin") is a long-standing project to provide flood management. The Basin is needed for the University District Specific Plan, pursuant to the Development Agreement between the City and the University District developers Vast Oak LP and University District LLC. However, the Basin would also benefit the wider community, as shown in the City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. The project's total estimated cost is $27 million. The current $3.45 million project budget, which will take the project through environmental documentation and design, is a combination of funds provided through the development agreement (i.e., Public Facilities Finance Fee advance), and approximately $800,000 of a $6 million FEMA grant awarded to the City in 2020. Obligation of the remaining $5.2 million in FEMA grant funds is anticipated; however, the remainder of the project funding would need to come from additional developer contribution, the City's General Fund, or future grants. It should be additionally noted that the Five -Year CIP does not include additional projects and programs that are managed by the CIP team at the Public Works Department, such as the Benicia Park Snack Bar Rehabilitation, Storm Drain System Assessment, Soundwall Replacement Assessment, traffic signals system administration, and land development review, for example. These projects are typically budgeted in the department's operational budget — and therefore are not shown in the CIP — but draw on the same staff resources to administer and deliver the projects. Proposed Projects for FY 2025-26 CIP Budget At a future meeting — typically at the same time as the City Operational Budget — the City Council will be asked to consider the adoption of the Five -Year CIP, which would include approval of the slate of projects, but not actual budget appropriations for FY 2026-27 through FY 2029-30 years. The City Council will also be asked to consider adopting the FY 2025-26 CIP Budget, which includes approving funding appropriations from identified funding sources and establishment of project budgets. OAK #4907-7886-6704 v1 4 ITEM NO. 9.13. The projects below are presently proposed for new/additional funding through the FY 2025-26 CIP: Current Project Proposed Resulting Project Project Budget FY 2025-26 Budget if Funding Approved Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park $2,818,598 $2,181,402 $5,000,000 2025 Pavement Preservation Project $900,000 $5,100,000 $6,000,000 Traffic Signals System Non -Routine $439,591* $250,000 $689,591 Maintenance ADA Transition Plan Implementation $140,000* $50,000 $190,000 $1,102,500 (there is Adrian Drive Safety Demonstration Project $0 partial Federal grant $1,102,500 funding of $840,000) 2026 Pavement Preservation Project $0 $4,797,200 $4,797,200 *Existing budget remaining to carryover to FY 2025-26. (Attachment A shows total project budget from inception to date, not the amount remaining These projects are recommended by City staff to meet immediate delivery timelines (e.g., the Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park project is now out to bid); pavement preservation is imperative (e.g., pavement projects need to be done in a timely fashion before a certain point of deterioration); compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act; commitment of a grant match; and continuance of an ongoing replacement program. Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements Budget Amendment This project is a third phase of the improvements of Keiser Avenue, which was completely reconstructed to provide circulation to the University District. The road work at the intersection of Keiser Avenue and Snyder Lane includes widening, new roadway median, asphalt concrete paving, new curb and gutter, new planter and sidewalk, and installation of two new traffic signals. Design and construction documents were completed in Summer 2024, including an updated engineer's estimate of $3,204,000. This estimate exceeds the current budget of $2,400,000 by $804,000. Including additional funds needed for construction management costs, a budget augmentation of $1,003,000 is needed to complete the project. City staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution to appropriate $1,003,000 from the Public Facilities Fee ("PFF") Fund (Fund 4250) for the project and also increase the project budget to $3,403,000, which is sufficient to deliver the project. The PFF Fund contains revenues from the development fee program created by the Public Facilities Finance Plan ("PFFP"). The PFFP implements the City's General Plan policies that call for new development to pay a "fair -share" of the costs of improvements required to serve new development. Consistent with California Government Code Section 66000 et. seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), the PFFP provides a fair share analysis and nexus for fees collected under the program, including the nexus for roadway and traffic signals improvements to maintain the levels of service outlined in the General Plan. The Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue intersection is one of fifteen locations identified by the PFFP to required additional capacity to be constructed to handle increased trip volume from new development, and for which PFF Fund monies can be used for such improvements. OAK #4907-7886-6704 v1 5 ITEM NO. 9.13. The City's CIP Program Benefits Local Contractors Staff has also performed an analysis on the amounts of contracts awarded to local subcontractors for major CIP projects since the last update presentation to City Council (July 2023).Table 1 shows the value of construction contracts over the last 1.5 years that have been awarded to local contractors compared to out -of -the -area contractors in Sonoma and Marin counties that were awarded through City Council: Table 1- Amount Awarded to Construction Contracts contractors in Sonoma and Percentage Awarded by City Council Marin Counties Staying Locally 19, 486, 402 15, 715, 832 81 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15306 and 15273(a)(4) because the Capital Improvement Plan is a budgetary document for future actions and a process for allocating and obtaining funds for capital projects, necessary to maintain service and is not a "project" under CEQA. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: The recommended action is consistent with the multi -year broad goals adopted by the Rohnert Park City Council in May 2024, and which include: (1) Long Term Financial Sustainability, (2) Community Quality of Life, (3) Planning and Infrastructure, and (4) Organization Well Being. OPTIONS CONSIDERED: Option 1 (Recommended Option): Receive the Project Status Informational Update, and approve the attached resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2024-25 (FY 2024-25) CIP Budget to appropriate $1,003,000 from Public Facilities Fee Fund (Fund 4250) for the Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements (CIP2201) and to increase the project budget for CIP2201 from $2,400,000 to $3,403,000. Option 2: Direct staff to make changes and come back for further consideration of the Five -Year CIP Plan and funding of Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements at a later date. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: There is no fiscal impact of receiving the informational item on the Five -Year CIP. The fiscal impact of the proposed budget amendment to appropriate new funds to CIP2201 and increase the project budget is a budgeted transfer out of $1,003,000 from Fund 4250 (reducing the fund balance in Fund 4250) into the Capital Projects Fund (Fund 7110) to cover the expenses of the CIP2201 project. There is no impact to the General Fund with this budget amendment. Department Head Approval Date: 01/14/2025 Finance Director Approval Date: 01/17/2025 City Attorney Approval Date: 01/14/2025 OAK #4907-7886-6704 v1 6 ITEM NO. 9.13. City Manager Approval Date: 01/21/2025 Attachments: 1. Draft Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Budget 2. Resolution Amending the FY 2024-25 CIP Budget to Appropriate $1,003,000 from Public Facilities Fee Fund (Fund 4250) and to Increase the Project Budget for Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements (CIP2201) from $2,400,000 to $3,403,000 OAK #4907-7886-6704 v1 7 DRAFT Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Budget (FY2025-26 through FY2029-30) I DRAFT Five -Year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Budget: FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30 Total Budget PRIOR YEARS AND FY 24-25 CIP BUDGET FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET (Actual through Prior years Bu ge inona FY 24+Budgeted approved budget amendments Projected Budget Projected FY25 +Planned through Adopted Budget since Amendments Amended Proposed Planned Planned Planned Planned Proj. FY 26-30 for FY 2024-25 CIP CIP# No. Project Name Funding Sources Projects FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 budget adoption FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2029-30 A. CITY FACILITIES AND RECREATION - EXPANSION/NEW Public Facilities Fee, State Grant (through SCWA), Copeland Creek Drainage rM Fee, FEMA BRIC Grant Copeland Creek Detention (Federal), Developer OF39 0604 Basin & Refugia Contribution $ 27,000,000 3,455,965 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 23,544,035 $ - $ Grant, General Fund, Infrastructure Reserve, Measure M Transportation, Trail to Crane Creek TDA Article 3 Allocation, PR-49 0719 Regional Park Park In -Lieu Fee $ 5,000,000 $ 2,818,598 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,181,402 $ - $ - $ - $ 2007R Bond Proceeds Repayment, General Fund, Casino Supplemental, Neighborhood Upgrade & Downtown Infrastructure Workforce Hsg, Rohnert OF-95 2226 (non -utilities portion) Park Foundation $ 10,200,000 $12,200,000 $ $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ FEMA Hazard Mitigation Autonomous Fire Watch Grant (Federal), OF-98 2304 System Infrastructure Reserve Fund $ 296,973 $ 236,973 $ $ $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ $ $ $ $ PR- Downtown Park 134 2401 Improvements Park In -Lieu Fee $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ General Fund (budget transfer from CIP2226 OF-102 2402 Corporation Yard Expansion Downtown Infrastructure) $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Station #4 (Southern Station) NEW Relocation Measure H $ 300,000 $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 300,000 Station #2 (Northern Station) NEW Remodel Measure H $ 300,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 300,000 B. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM - EXPANSION / NEW Snyder Lane Widening (San TR-027 1706 Francisco Dr to Keiser Ave) Public Facilities Fee $ 5,553,672 103,672 $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,450,000 $ $ $ Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue TR-143 2201 Intersection Improvements Public Facilities Fee $ 3,403,000 $ 2,400,000 $ $ $ 1,003,000 $ 1,003,000 $ $ - $ $ $ Public Facilities Fee, Sewer Keiser Avenue Utility Fund, Developer TR-035 1718 Reconstruction Ph. 2 Contribution $ 5,674,504 $ 5,674,504 $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ $ $ Dowdell Avenue Extension Phase 1 (Emergency Vehicle TR-130 2020 Access) Public Facilities Fee $ 7,540,597 $ 7,540,597 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Dowdell Avenue Extension Phase 2 (Business Park - Golf Course) Public Facilities Fee $ 5,816,180 $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ 600,000 $ $ 5,216,180 $ Infrastructure Reserve, Highway 101 CMAQ Grant (Federal), Gas Bicycle/Pedestrian Tax, Measure M TR-144 2202 Overcrossing Transportation $ 4,345,000 $ 775,0001 $ $ 3,570,000 $ $ 3,570,000 $ $ $ $ $ HSIP Grant (State), Gas Citywide Traffic Signal Tax, Infrastructure Reserve, TR-149 2225 Safety Improvements Measure M $ 2,262,600 $ 2,262,600 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ Printed 1/21/2025, 3:38 PM 1 of 5 DRAFT Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Budget (FY2025-26 through FY2029-30) I DRAFT Five -Year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Budget: FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30 Total Budget PRIOR YEARS AND FY 24-25 CIP BUDGET FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET (Actual through Prior years u ge inona FY 24+Budgeted approved budget amendments Projected Budget Projected FY25 +Planned through Adopted Budget since Amendments Amended Proposed Planned Planned Planned Planned Pmj. FY 26-30 for FY 2024-25 CIP CIP# No. Project Name Funding Sources Projects FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 budget adoption FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2029-30 TR-145 2203 Bikeshare Implementation Measure M $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ Golf Course Drive West Improvements (SB Ramp to Casino Supplemental, TR-1522407 Redwood Dr) (other funding TBD) $ 6,042,695 $ 1,328,279 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,714,416 $ $ Casino Supplemental, Hwy. 101 SB / Golf Course Casino One -Time Dr. Off -Ramp Intersection Contribution, (other funding TR-1532408 Improvements TBD) $ 6,883,884 $ 1,263,780 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,620,104 $ $ Hwy. 101 NB / Commerce Blvd. Off -Ramp Intersection Casino Supplemental, TR-1542409 Improvements (other funding TBD) $ 7,611,720 1 $ 1,397,400 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 6,214,320 $ $ Casino Supplemental, NEW NEW ATMS Improvements (other funding TBD) $ 3,105,000 $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ 3,105,000 $ Casino One -Time RPX / Redwood Drive Contribution, (other funding TR-1552410 Intersection Improvements TBD) $ 4,281,376 858,208 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,423,168 $ - $ Electric Vehicle Charging 2312 Stations RP Foundation $ 285,000 120,000 $ $ 165,000 $ $ 165,000 $ $ $ $ $ C. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM - PAVEMENT PRESERVATION and COMPLETE STREETS Central Rohnert Park PDA Gas Tax, Measure M TR-1062204 Complete Streets Transportation $ 1,872,000 $ 272,000 $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ 1,600,000 $ $ Gas Tax, SB1-RMRA, Measure M Transportation, 2021-22 VS Preventative Road Refuse Impact Fund, TR-137 2205 Maintenance (A&B Section) Infrastructure Reserve $ 1,113,595 $ 1,113,595 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TR- Southwest Blvd Complete Gas Tax, SB1-RMRA, 133/13 Streets (Roundabout to Measure M Transportation, 9 2023 Adrian) Infrastructure Reserve $ 4,351,325 $ 4,351,325 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Federal Grant, SB-1 RMRA, 2023-24 Various Streets Infrastructure Reserve, TR-141 2301 Pavement Management Casino Supplemental $ 2,106,273 $ 3,006,273 $ $ 900,000 $ $ 900,000 $ $ $ $ $ Gas Tax, SB1-RMRA, 2025 Pavement Preservation Measure M Transportation, 2508 Project Infrastructure Reserve $ 6,000,000 $ - $ $ 900,000 $ $ 900,000 $ 5,100,000 $ $ $ $ Gas Tax, SB1-RMRA, 2026 Pavement Preservation Measure M Transportation, Project Infrastructure Reserve $ 4,797,200 $ $ $ - $ $ - $ 4,797,200 $ $ $ $ Gas Tax, SB1-RMRA, 2027 Pavement Preservation Measure M Transportation, Project Infrastructure Reserve $ 6,407,600 $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ 6,407,600 $ $ $ Gas Tax, SB1-RMRA, 2028 Pavement Preservation Measure M Transportation, Project Infrastructure Reserve $ 5,452,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ 5,452,000 $ $ Gas Tax, SB1-RMRA, 2029 Pavement Preservation Measure M Transportation, Project Infrastructure Reserve $ 5,432,100 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ 5,432,100 $ Gas Tax, SB1-RMRA, Adrian Drive Safety Measure M Transportation, NEW Demonstration Project Infrastructure Reserve $ 1,102,500 $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,102,500 $ $ $ - $ Wilfred Avenue Pavement TR-138 Maintenance Wilfred JEPA $ 300,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ 300,000 D. NON -CAPITAL MAINTENANCE Printed 1/21/2025, 3:38 PM 2 of 5 DRAFT Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Budget (FY2025-26 through FY2029-30) I DRAFT Five -Year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Budget: FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30 Total Budget PRIOR YEARS AND FY 24-25 CIP BUDGET FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET (Actual through Prior years u ge inona FY 24+Budgeted approved budget amendments Projected Budget Projected FY25 +Planned through Adopted Budget since Amendments Amended Proposed Planned Planned Planned Planned Prof. FY 26-30 for FY 2024-25 CIP CIP# No. Project Name Funding Sources Projects FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 budget adoption FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2029-30 Infrastructure Reserve, Buildings Major Repairs (non- Neighborhood Upgrade & OF-78 1927 capital) Workforce Housing $ 440,074 $ 440,074 $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Signals System Non- Gas Ta), SB1-RMRA, TR-126 1928 Routine Maint Casino Supplemental $ 2,499,106 $ 999,106 $ 250,000 $ $ $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Infrastructure Reserve, Gas TR-146 2206 Pothole Repair Maintenance Tax $ 700,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ $ $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 PR- Parks Playground 126 2207 Equipment Replacement Measure M Parks $ 710,000 $ 70,000 $ 300,000 $ $ $ 300,000 $ $ 150,000 $ 20,000 $ 150,000 $ 20,000 PR- Park Electrical Replacement Infrastructure Reserve, 127 2208 Fund (non -routine) Measure M Parks $ 450,000 $ 300,000 $ 150,000 $ $ $ 150,000 $ $ $ $ $ E. FEASIBILITY STUDIES, ASSESSMENTS, FACILITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLANNING ADA Transition Plan Phase II OF-90 2211 - ROW Gas Tax, Measure M $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ PR- Parks Master Plan and 129 2212 Maintenance Plan Measure M Parks $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Local Road Safety Plan NEW Update Gas Tax, Measure M $ 200,000 $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 200,000 $ Park Assets Condition Assessment & Maintenance/Replacement NEW Plan Measure M Parks $ 250,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 250,000 $ $ F. OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE - PARKING LOTS, PATHS, SIDEWALKS, SYSTEMS Gas Tax, Rohnert Park Foundation, Infrastructure Reserve, Neighborhood Neighborhood Upgrades: Upgrade & Workforce OF-63 1722 Creek Path Replacements Housing $ 3,283,996 $ 3,283,996 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Gas Tax, Rohnert Park Foundation, Infrastructure Reserve, Neighborhood Upgrade & Workforce Creek Path Replacements Housing $ 2,600,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 Gas Tax, Rohnert Park Foundation, Infrastructure Reserve, Neighborhood Wooden Pole Streetlights Upgrade & Workforce OF-71 1826 Replacement Housing $ 1,355,000 1,355,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ Gas Tax, Rohnert Park Foundation, Infrastructure Reserve, Neighborhood Wooden Pole Streelights Upgrade & Workforce Replacement (Final Phase) Housing $ 150,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 150,000 1 $ $ $ Sidewalk Replacement Infrastructure Reserve, Gas OF-94 2303 Program Tax $ 1,400,000 $ 200,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 G. CITY FACILITIES & RECREATION - REHABILITATION / REPLACEMENT PR- Court Surfaces & Fencing - J$ J 106 Ladybug Rohnert Park Foundation $ 90,000 - $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ 20,000 $ 70,000 $ Printed 1/21/2025, 3:38 PM 3 of 5 DRAFT Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Budget (FY2025-26 through FY2029-30) I DRAFT Five -Year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Budget: FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30 Total Budget PRIOR YEARS AND FY 24-25 CIP BUDGET FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET (Actual through Prior years u ge inona FY 24+Budgeted approved budget amendments Projected Budget Projected FY25 +Planned through Adopted Budget since Amendments Amended Proposed Planned Planned Planned Planned Proj. FY 26-30 for FY 2024-25 CIP CIP# No. Project Name Funding Sources Projects FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 budget adoption FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2029-30 PR- 107 Court Surfaces - Rainbow Rohnert Park Foundation $ 65,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 20,000 $ 45,000 $ PR- Court Surfaces & Fencing - 108 Golis Rohnert Park Foundation $ 141,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 20,000 $ 121,000 $ ADA Transition Plan OF-72 1827 Implementation Infrastructure Reserve $ 390,000 $ 200,000 $ $ $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Infrastructure Reserve, Neighborhood Upgrade & PR- Ladybug Park Pool Buildings Workforce Hsg, Measure M 118 1924 Demolition Parks $ 260,000 $ 260,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ PR- Community Center Upgrades 119 1925 & Gas Line Replacement $ 204,676 $ 204,676 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ IT Access Control Information Technology OF-86 2103 Replacement Project Internal Services Fund $ 462,000 $ 127,000 $ 235,000 $ - $ - $ 235,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Building Condition Infrastructure Reserve, OF-100 2310 Assessment Implementation General Fund $ 14,426,826 $ 1,831,503 $ - $ 4,677 $ $ 4,677 $ $ $ 11,400,000 $ $1,200,000 ADA Transition Plan -ADA Lifts Repair at PAC, PR- Community Center, Gold Infrastructure Reserve, PAC 131 2217 Ridge MU Capital Facilities Fee $ 154,658 $ 64,658 $ $ $ Is $ $ 90,000 1 $ $ $ PR- Park Benches and Shade 132 2218 Structures Replacement Measure M Parks $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ Measure M Parks, GF PR- Sunrise Park Pickleball & M Infrastructure, Casino 133 2307 Park Tennis Courts Supplemental $ 3,002,712 $ 1,002,712 $ $ 2,000,000 $ $ 2,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ Library Building Systems Building Forward Library OF-103 2411 Replacements Grant, General Fund $ 1,955,468 $ 1,955,468 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ Public Safety Antenna and OF-104 2412 Radio System Replacement General Fund $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ City Hall Roof, HVAC & 2007R Bond Proceeds 2501 Lighting Controls Repayment ("Bond 3") $ 800,000 $ - $ $ 800,000 $ $ 800,000 $ $ $ $ $ Public Safety Main Rooftop 2007R Bond Proceeds 2502 Patio Replacement Repayment ("Bond 3") $ 500,000 $ $ $ 500,000 $ $ 500,000 $ $ $ $ $ Public Safety Main Battery 2503 Backup UPS General Fund $ 40,000 $ $ $ 40,000 $ $ 40,000 $ $ $ $ $ Public Safety Main Vehicle 2504 Gates General Fund $ 45,000 $ $ $ 45,000 $ $ 45,000 $ $ $ $ $ 6250 State Farm Drive 2505 Improvements General Fund $ 50,000 $ $ $ 50,000 $ $ 50,000 $ $ $ $ $ 2507 Holiday Lights Replacement GF Infrastructure $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ Boys & Girls Club Siding and NEW NEW Roof Replacement General Fund $ 100,000 $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 100,000 $ $ $ Printed 1/21/2025, 3:38 PM 4 of 5 DRAFT Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Budget (FY2025-26 through FY2029-30) I DRAFT Five -Year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Budget: FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30 Total Budget PRIOR YEARS AND FY 24-25 CIP BUDGET FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET (Actual through Prior years u ge inona FY 24+Budgeted ppro-d budget amendments Projected Budget Projected FY25 +Planned through Adopted Budget since Amendments Amended Proposed Planned Planned Planned Planned Pmj. FY 26-30 for FY 2024-25 CIP CIP# No. Project Name Funding Sources Projects FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 budget adoption FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2029-30 Corporation Yard Leak NEW NEW Repairs General Fund $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ $ $ TOTAL FUNDING EACH YEAR TO PROJECTS IN FUND 7110 $66,504,962 $ 1,035,000 $ 5,165,323 $ 1,003,000 $7,203,323 #######Ml $14,297,600 $ 63,298,043 $ 15,589,280 $3,170,000 Printed 1/21/2025, 3:38 PM 5 of 5 RESOLUTION NO.2025-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 (FY 2024-25) CIP BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE $1,003,000 FROM PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE FUND (FUND 4250) FOR SNYDER LANE/KEISER AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (CIP2201) INCREASE THE PROJECT BUDGET FOR CIP2201 FROM $2,400,000 TO $3,403,000 (CEQA STATUS: EXEMPT UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES §§ 15306) WHEREAS, projects in the Public Facilities Finance Plan are constructed to support new development, including the University District Specific Plan on the east side of Rohnert Park; and WHEREAS, the Keiser Avenue reconstruction, which includes improvements at the intersection of Keiser Avenue and Snyder Lane, is a project included in the Public Facilities Finance Plan; and WHEREAS, the Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements (CIP2201) ("Project") is the third phase of the Keiser Avenue reconstruction of which two phases are already completed; and WHEREAS, design and construction documents for the Project were completed in Summer 2024, including an updated engineer's estimate of $3,204,000 which exceeds the current project budget of $2,400,000 provided by City of Rohnert Park FY 2024-25 Capital Improvements Plan Budget; and WHEREAS, a total budget augmentation of $1,003,000 is requested for the Project, which includes the $840,000 shortfall between the existing budget and the engineer's estimate for construction, as well as additional funds needed for construction management; and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the Fiscal Year 2024-25 CIP Budget to provide a total project budget of $3,403,000 to deliver the Project; and WHEREAS, the Public Facilities Finance Fee Fund (Fund 4250) is the appropriate funding source for this project, as revenues in Fund 4250 are from impact fees collected from developers to construct infrastructure listed in the Public Facilities Finance Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park approves as follows: I. The above recitals are true and correct and material to this Resolution. 2. The Finance Director is hereby authorized to implement a budget amendment increasing the Project budget of the Snyder Lane/Keiser Avenue Intersection Improvements (CIP2201) from $2,400,000 to $3,403,000 with a new appropriation of $1,003,000 from the Public Facilities Finance Fee Fund (Fund 4250) to the CIP2022 budget; and related actions to implement the Project. DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED this 28th day of January, 2025. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK Gerard Guidice, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia Lopez Cuevas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michelle M. Kenyon, City Attorney Adams: Elward: Rodriguez: Sanborn: Guidice: Ayes: ( ) Noes: ( ) Absent: ( ) Abstain: ( ) Resolution 2025-007 Page 2 of 2 Avk City Projects Updat., Senior Public Works Analyst Eydie Tacata Public Works Director Vanessa Garrett Meet the team -*.Q FF VVEL.COMETO THE 2024 CIPAE AWARDS! , 1�6wwwlw Ir M Capital Improvement Program drivers Utility Studies Streets Preventative Maintenance Plan Building Condition Assessment Pathway Maintenance Plan Development Driven Improvements General Plan Master Plans (Parks, Transportation, etc) 3 Other project drivers (not in CIP) Unexpected facility repair B Park concession stand Leaking roofs Emergency projects Sewer Force Main Break Contracted projects operational Replacing failed facility infrastructure Contracting City-wide for any construction project W tac kg ro u n it <r Upp 38.03 ----� 43.UU 1+ Other duties Public Works review for land development applications Traffic Management System Administration Project Grants Awarded Grants Project Grantor Agency Amount Phase 1- Well and Tank Seismic Retrofit Project Federal- FEMA through Cal OES $ 290,191 Phase 2- Fire Watch Camera Installation Federal-FEMA through Cal OES $ 163,026 Phase 1- Detention Basin Federal-FEMA through Cal OES $ 427,507 Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing Federal-FHWA through Caltrans $ 3,2001000 Trail to Crane Creek Park Local- Ag and Open Space $ 1,300,000 Southwest Blvd State Funded through Caltrans $ 2,850,000 Grants Slated For Award- No Agreement Signed Yet Project Grantor Agency Amount Library Building Improvements CA State Library $ 1,300,000 PDA Improvements Locally Funded through SCTA $ 1,600,000 Safe Streets for All Federal -through SCTA $ 800,000 Phase 2- Well and Tank Seismic Retrofit Project Federal- FEMA through Cal OES $ 7,000,000 Phase 2- Detention Basin Federal-FEMA through Cal OES $ 5,500,000 Water Quality Improvements Federal- Army Corps of Engineers $ 10,000,000 Project highlights Completed projects in last year A&B Section utility upgrade project Lining oldest sewer lines in City Spot repairs as needed Water line replacements Over$6 million Southwest Blvd water line replacement $1 .7 million to replace aging water line prior to rehabilitating roadway Pavement Maintenance Project million investment in street maintenance Project highlights Completed projects in last year Replaced traffic signal infrastructure at all traffic signals in City Upgraded to accessibility compliant infrastructure Replaced controller and emergency preemption equipment Installed/ replaced battery backup equipment Replaced out of compliance traffic signal heads with compliant ones Fully grant funded! Project highlights In progress Southwest Blvd Complete Streets Estimated completion summer 2025 Partially grant funded Building Condition Assessment Implementation $1.2 million in design awarded Design will address $1 3 million in repairs from building condition assessment recommendations 9 Project highlights In progress Casino Expansion Traffic Projects Feasibility study in progress for effective options Conceptual designs for each intersection being d rafted Snyder Lane/ Keiser Traffic Signal PG&E almost complete with relocating poles Expected construction start date summer 2025 IN Project Highlights In progress rn RORNERT -PAR K- ++ ■ .T IQOt(Pd* BIKE a PEUtS I KlAk HIGHWAY 101 C ROSSI N G ROHNERT PARK HIGHWAY 101 BIKE & PEDESTRIAN CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY Highway 101 bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing Design and environmental work in progress Partially Grant funded ($3.75 million total; 80% grant) A&B section pavement maintenance Construction starting summer 2025 Roads listed on City website Well and tank upgrade project Roughly $10 million requested through CaIOES e laces City's two oldest water tanks/ several wells Construction Award Statistics Amount Awarded to Construction Contracts contractors in Sonoma and Percentage Awarded by City Council Marin Counties Staying Locally 19, 486, 402 15, 715, 832 81% 12 U I Current Project Proposed Resulting Project rojewormw FY 2025-26 Budget if Budget Funding Approved Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park 2025 Pavement Preservation Project Traffic Signals System Non -Routine Maintenance ADA Transition Plan Implementation Adrian Drive Safety Demonstration Project 2026 Pavement Preservation Project Pavement Maintenance THE CONCEPT OF PAVEMENT T P E EPV TI f CATCH STREETS BEFORE E THEY FAIL ,% 1100 F CIL VERY GOOD 70 � C GOOD 60 Ira 50 0 40 U 4a G 25 M CL Focus Budget Here Before Overlay is Required Focus Budget Horo Before Reconstruction Is Required 4 e 12 16 Pavement Age (Years) COST Localized Preventive Maintenance ;a S • Crack Seal m 0 Preventhre Treatments 3 • Slurry Seals 3 • Micro -Surfacing Z • Chip and Cape Seals m 4 Reconstructive Treatments $$ • Overlay M $$ 3 M • Full Depth Reclamation Z $$$$ $$$$ 20 14 Stiff Recommendation Discussion regarding 5-year CIP document Project list Funding Approve a budget amendment for the Keiser/ Snyder traffic signal project from PUP fund balance 15